UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB/A
(Mark One)
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
/ / TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File No. 000-22847
AMEN Properties, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant in Its Charter)
Delaware 54-1831588
------------------------------- ---------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
303 West Wall St. Suite 2300
Midland, TX 79701
---------------------------------------- --------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
432-684-3821
------------
Issuer's telephone number, including area code
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
Common Stock $0.01 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None
----
Title of each class
Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. / /
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB /X/
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes / / No /X/
The issuer's revenues from operations for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006 were $15,056,800.
1
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates, based on the
closing price at which the stock was sold at February 15, 2007 was approximately
$13.05 million.
Check whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes / / No / /
The total number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of
February 15, 2007 was 2,290,589.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): Yes No X
------- ------
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Exhibits to certain of the Company's filings are incorporated by reference as
Exhibits to this Report as set forth in Part III, Item 13.
Portions of the Company's definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual
shareholders meeting, to be filed on or before April 30, 2007, are incorporated
by reference in Part III.
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information in this annual report on Form 10-KSB may contain
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21e of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of
historical fact are "forward-looking statements" for purposes of these
provisions, including any projections of earnings, revenues, cash flow or other
financial items, any statements of the plans and objectives of management for
future operations, any statements concerning proposed new products or services,
any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, and any
statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases,
"forward-looking statements" can be identified by the use of terminology such as
"may," "will," "expects," "believes," "plans," "anticipates," "estimates,"
"potential," or "continue," or the negative thereof or other comparable
terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
"forward-looking statements" are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such
expectations or any of our "forward-looking statements" will prove to be
correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or
assumed in our "forward-looking statements." Our financial condition and
results, as well as any other "forward-looking statements," are subject to
inherent risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those risk
factors summarized in Item 6, "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation."
Background
The Company was originally incorporated as DIDAX Inc. in January 1997 and
through the end of December 31, 2002 operated under the name Crosswalk.com, Inc.
and consisted primarily of the operation of crosswalk.com(TM) and a direct mail
advertising service. During the last quarter of 2002, the Company sold
substantially all of the assets used, required, useful, or otherwise relating to
the operations of both businesses. The Company then changed its name to Amen
Properties, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "AMEN" or "the Company") effective
February 3, 2003. Following shareholder approval of a new business plan in 2002,
the Company initially acquired an approximate 64.86% limited partnership
interest in TCTB Partnership Partners, Ltd. ("TCTB") and in early 2004 the
Company acquired an additional 6.485533% interest in TCTB giving the Company a
total of 71.348013% limited partnership interest in TCTB. Effective September
27, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to distribute assets with and
among the partners of TCTB and contemporaneous with the distribution of the
properties, the Company along with the General Partner and the other limited
Partners of TCTB collectively agreed to sell and sold 75% of their undivided
interest in the Properties. The Company continues to have significant
involvement in the operations of the properties and currently has a remaining
ownership interest of 18.017% in the properties. In July of 2004, the Company
funded its newly created wholly owned subsidiary, W Power and Light, L.P. ("W
Power"). The creation of W Power has allowed the Company to enter a new market
2
created when the Texas legislature adopted the Texas Electric Choice Plan, which
significantly changed the regulatory structure governing electric utilities in
the State of Texas. On May 18, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of
Priority Power Management, Ltd. and Priority Power Dallas, Ltd. effective April
1, 2006. Priority Power Management, Ltd and Priority Power Dallas Ltd.'s primary
business involves retail electricity demand aggregation in Texas, and energy
management and consulting in 22 states inluding Texas, California, Illinois, New
York, and New Jersey.
Under the 2002 business plan, we have attempted to grow our business through
selective acquisitions of cash-generating assets in three distinct arenas that
have historically generated large amounts of ordinary income - commercial real
estate in secondary stagnant markets, commercial real estate in out of favor
growth markets and oil and gas royalties. While we have focused on these areas,
we have also considered and evaluated opportunities to acquire other properties
and businesses that have a consistent and stable cash flow history. During 2004
we extended the 2002 business plan to include our new electricity retail
business, W Power, and our intent is to accumulate these assets to generate
income and create shareholder value. During 2006, through the acquisition of
Priority Power Management, Ltd and Priority Power Mangement Dallas, Ltd., the
Company was able to obtain a complimentary business to our entry into the retail
electricity markets through W Power and obtain a wholly owned subsidiary with a
history of stable cash flow.
In initiating the 2002 business plan the Company, in October 2002, formed NEMA
Properties LLC ("NEMA"), a Nevada limited liability company 100% owned by AMEN;
AMEN Delaware LP ("Delaware"), a Delaware limited partnership owned 99% by NEMA
as the sole limited partner and 1% by AMEN, as the sole general partner; and
AMEN Minerals LP ("Minerals"), a Delaware limited partnership, owned 99% by NEMA
as the sole limited partner and 1% by AMEN, as the sole general partner. On July
30, 2004, the Company formed W Power and Light LP ("W Power"), a Delaware
limited partnership owned 99% by NEMA as the sole limited partner and 1% by
AMEN, as the sole general partner. On May 18, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of
Priority Power Management, Ltd. and Priority Power Management Dallas, Ltd.
(collectively "Priority Power") effective April 1, 2006. Priority Power is owned
1% by AMEN, as the sole general partner, and 99% by NEMA, as the sole limited
Partner. It is the Company's intent for Delaware to own all our real estate
assets, for Minerals to own our oil and gas royalty investments, W Power to hold
our retail electricity provider services, and Priority Power to hold our
electricity and natural gas consulting, aggregation, and management services
assets. As used herein, the terms "Company" and "AMEN" and references to "we"
and "our" refer to all of AMEN Properties, Inc., NEMA, Delaware, Minerals, and W
Power and Priority Power unless the context otherwise requires.
The Company makes available, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC"). These reports may also be obtained directly from the SEC via an
Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) and at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
The Company will also provide to any person, free of charge, a copy of the
Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics upon request made to the Company
at 303 West Wall St., Suite 2300, Midland, Texas 79701, attn: Mr. Kris Oliver.
Status of Business Plan
The Company implemented the 2002 business plan in October 2002 by acquiring an
approximate 64.9% limited partnership interest in TCTB. Effective January 1,
2004, the Company acquired an additional 6.485533% limited partnership interest
in TCTB giving the Company a total of 71.348013% limited partnership interest in
TCTB. Effective September 27, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to
distribute assets with and among the partners of TCTB. The assets consisted of
two secondary office market properties in Midland, Texas. Collectively referred
to as "the Properties" (See Item 2 below for further description of the
Properties). Contemporaneous with the distribution of the Properties, the
Company along with the General Partner and the other limited Partners of TCTB
collectively agreed to sell and sold 75% of their undivided interest in the
Properties. The Company continues to have significant involvement in the
operations of the Properties and currently has a remaining ownership interest of
18.017% in the Properties. TCTB continues to hold record title to the undivided
25% interest in the Properties beneficially owned by the Partners of TCTB
("Selling Partners"), including the Company's 18.017% ownership, which was not
included in the sale to the Buyers. After the sale, TCTB, the Selling and the
Buyers, as all of the owners of the Properties, entered into a Management
Agreement with TCTB Management Group, LLC ("Management") dated September 29,
2006 relating to the management of the Properties. The Management Agreement is
effective until August 31, 2007 unless earlier terminated in accordance with its
terms. The owners of Management are the Selling Partners (including the Company)
and the Buyers in the same percentages as their proportionate ownership of the
Properties. Mr. Jon Morgan, President and CEO of the Company, is the managing
member of Management.
3
In July of 2004, the Company funded its newly created wholly owned subsidiary, W
Power. It should be noted that the formation and funding of W Power signified an
expansion from the Company's prior business focus. This change of focus contains
significantly more risk than the incremental asset based model we were pursuing
that resulted in limited opportunities. Though the Company may consider
opportunities to acquire cash flow generating assets, the Company is currently
focusing its efforts on the retail electricity market in Texas through W Power
as a Retail Electric Provider ("REP") to compete in the Texas market. The
creation of W Power has allowed the Company to enter a new market created when
the Texas legislature adopted the Texas Electric Choice Plan, which
significantly changed the regulatory structure governing electric utilities in
Texas. In September 2004, the Public Utility Commission of Texas ("PUCT")
awarded W Power a license to begin commercial REP operations in Texas and in
November 2004 W Power received its certification from the Electric Reliability
Council of Texas ("ERCOT"). As a REP, W Power sells electricity and provides the
related billing, customer service, collection and remittance services to
residential, commercial, and industrial customers. W Power offers its customers
low electricity rates, flexible payment and pricing choices, simple terms and
responsive customer service. The Texas regulatory structure and legislation
permits independent REPs (companies unaffiliated with an incumbent utility in a
particualar geographic area), such as W Power, to procure and sell electricity
at unregulated prices and pay the local transmission and distribution utilities
a regulated tariff rate for delivering electricity to the customers. Though we
have not abandoned the 2002 business model, our focus is to support W Power for
the immediate future.
The Company's newly acquired subsidiary, Priority Power, has current or previous
business activities in 22 states including Texas. These activities include but
are not limited to electricity load aggregation, natural gas and electricity
procurement, energy risk management, and energy consulting in both regulated and
deregulated domestic markets. It should be noted that while Priority Power is
complimentary to the Company's movement into the deregulated retail electricity
market in Texas through W Power and leverages the significant market expertise
existing elsewhere in the Company, it also signifies an expansion in our
business focus which entails significantly more risk than the original 2002
Business Plan.
In July of 2006, Priority Power launched commercial operations of
ChooseEnergy.com--an online internet marketplace for residential and small
commercial electricity consumers whereby they can compare a number of REP's and
choose the provider that best meets their needs. During 2006, approximately
2,000 residential and 80 commercial customers used ChooseEnergy.com to select a
new retail electricity provider.
Management continues to assess opportunities to add value for our shareholders
whether under the 2002 business plan or extension of the principles of that
plan. We are committed to remaining patient with the development of W Power. W
Power's performance will depend on its ability to attract and maintain a strong
customer base, manage overhead costs, implement efficient controls and
procedures, and have sufficient collateral to meet its credit requirements made
by its generators, power marketers, ERCOT, and other electricity providers. We
believe that W Power is positioned to meet these requirements and is capable of
strong growth in the future, subject to the inherent risks and limitations
associated with a new REP company.
During the period in which the Company operated under the name Crosswalk.com,
the Company generated a net operating loss ("NOL") in excess of $30 million. In
an attempt to preserve the tax benefits of this NOL we operate in a restrictive
paradigm that does not allow access to traditional equity sources. Our intention
is to preserve our NOL, but certain issues outside our control may occur which
could jeopardize this position. If an opportunity that would require an
expansion of our equity base presents itself, we would welcome sacrificing our
NOL if the value added exceeded the present value we have assigned to the NOL.
If our capital does become limited, we intend to make acquisitions through
limited partnerships in a structure whereby AMEN would be the general
partner/manager, while property asset specific equity providers would be the
limited partners. However, we do not currently have any agreements or
arrangements relating to such financing and no assurances can be made that such
financing will be available on terms acceptable to us.
4
Impact of Government Regulation and Environmental Laws
In relation to the Company entering the retail electricity market in Texas, the
State of Texas began deregulation of the wholesale electricity market in 1995
with Senate Bill 373. This enabled independent power generators to establish
operations in Texas alongside those of the regulated utilities and gain access
to the transmission capabilities of the electricity power grid. This foundation,
coupled with the passing of Senate Bill 7 in 1999, has enabled an integrated
marketplace linking generators, energy delivery companies, retail electric
providers, and an independent grid operator, ERCOT, to offer choices to end-use
electricity customers. There are currently five major markets open to
competition as defined by ERCOT based on service areas in Texas covered by
formerly integrated utilities.
Effective January 1, 2002, retail customers of independent operating utilities
in the ERCOT region of Texas were allowed to choose a REP. A REP serves end-use
customers by purchasing its electricity from competing power producers in the
wholesale market, receiving delivery services from the regulated transmission
and distribution service providers (formerly the integrated utilities) and
performing basic customer service functions including billing, collections and
handling customer service requests.
As part of the Texas Senate Bill 7, the formerly integrated utilities were
essentially split apart into three businesses: 1) unregulated wholesale
businesses for power generation, 2) regulated transmission and distribution
service providers ("TDSPs") and 3) unregulated REPs. The REPs that were formed
by the formerly integrated utilities are referred to as "Affiliated REPs". These
Affiliated REPs are subject to restrictions on their ability to compete on price
in their own markets (the areas previously serviced by the integrated utility)
to foster competition through price discounts from competitors. The two largest
Affiliated REPs in Texas are TXU Energy and Reliant Energy, serving Dallas/Fort
Worth and Houston areas, respectively. The other Affiliated REPs include First
Choice an affiliate of Texas New Mexico Power, American Electric Power/Central
Power and Light, and American Electric Power/West Texas Utilities.
Effective January 1, 2002, all customers previously with the integrated utility,
whose annual electricity demand was under a megawatt (most small commercial and
residential customers), were transferred to Affiliated REPs to be served on a
month-to-month rate, known as the "Price-To-Beat" until such time that these
customers choose to be served by an independent REP. The "Price-To-Beat" rate,
set by the PUCT, was to serve as the benchmark, allowing independent REPs such
as W Power the flexibility to set their own prices to customers in each market.
The "Price-To-Beat" rule requires the Affiliated REPs to charge a regulated,
fixed rate in their respective incumbent markets until certain conditions are
met. For small commercial consumers, Affiliated REPs were required to only
charge the "Price-To-Beat" rate until either 40% of the load in their incumbent
market has been lost to other REPs or until January 1, 2005. All of the
affiliated REPs met the 40% threshold for small commercial consumers prior to
January 1, 2005. For both small commercial consumers and residential consumers,
Affiliated REPs are restricted from charging a rate that is higher than the
"Price-To-Beat" in their incumbent market until after January 1, 2007, without
the approval of the PUCT.
Three critical elements that we believe are essential to have a successful
retail electricity market are present in Texas. First, the wholesale energy
market is competitive, thereby enabling retailers to purchase supply at
competitive prices using bilateral agreements. Second, a common framework for
operating throughout Texas has been established to enable retailers to
effectuate switching, billing, service orders and other necessary transactions
with ERCOT (as a clearinghouse) and with the transmission and distribution
service providers. Third, a regulatory framework has been established that
encourages competition by enabling the Affiliated REP to adjust the
"Price-To-Beat" based on the movement in natural gas or purchased power prices.
This unique "Price-To-Beat" mechanism ensures that the retail margins in the
market can be preserved if commodity costs increase.
5
With regard to investments in oil and gas royalties, the production,
transportation and sale of natural gas from underlying properties are subject to
federal and state governmental regulation, including regulation and tariffs
charged by pipelines, taxes, the prevention of waste, the conservation of gas,
pollution controls and various other matters. The Federal Government and each
state have governmental power to impose measures that could increase the cost of
oil and gas properties. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") has
jurisdiction with respect to various aspects of gas operations including the
marketing and production of gas. The Natural Gas Act and the Natural Gas Policy
Act (collectively, the "Acts") mandate federal regulation of the interstate
transportation of gas. Numerous concerns regarding the interpretation and
implementation of several provisions of the Acts have led to lawsuits and
administrative proceedings to challenge the validity of the Acts. The FERC is
also considering various policies and proposals that may affect the marketing of
gas under new and existing contracts. Accordingly, we are unable to predict the
impact of any such governmental regulation.
In the past, Congress has been very active in the area of gas regulation. Due to
legislative action, previously applicable incremental pricing requirements and
gas use restraints have been repealed. However, it is not feasible to predict
with certainty, what proposals, if any, might actually be enacted by Congress or
other legislative bodies and what effect, if any, such proposals might have on
the oil and gas properties that may be considered for acquisition.
Under various environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of
real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous
or toxic substances, including asbestos-containing materials that are located on
or under the property. Specific asbestos remediation took place in the Bank of
America Tower (as defined herein) prior to the Company's ownership.
Environmental laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator
knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of those substances. In connection
with our ownership and operation of properties, we may be liable for these
costs, which could be substantial. Also, our ability to arrange for financing
secured by that real property might be adversely affected because of the
presence of hazardous or toxic substances or the failure to properly remediate
any contamination. In addition, we may be subject to claims by third parties
based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination at or
emanating from our properties.
In addition, under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), all public
accommodations are required to meet certain federal requirements related to
physical access and use by disabled persons. While we believe that the
Properties comply in all material respects with these physical requirements or
would be eligible for applicable exemptions from material requirements because
of adaptive assistance provided, a determination that we are not in compliance
with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to
private litigants. Any required modifications to comply with the ADA would most
likely result in unplanned cash expenditures that could impact our ability to
meet our financial objectives.
Operations
Our management consists of Jon Morgan, Chief Executive Officer, Kevin Yung,
Chief Operating Officer, and (effective March 7, 2007) Kris Oliver, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary. Currently, Kris Oliver is the brother
of the Company's former Chief Executive Officer (who resigned effective March 7,
2007) and current Chairman of the Board, Eric Oliver. Kris Oliver is replacing
the Company's former Chief Financial Officer (who resigned June 1, 2006) and
current Interim Chief Financial Officer, John James. Currently, Kris Oliver is
the only full time employee at the corporate level of AMEN Properties, Inc. TCTB
has five full time employees who assist in the day-to-day operations of the
Properties. W Power currently has four full time and 4 part-time employees, and
Priority Power has 8 full time and 4 part-time employees.
W Power provides electricity and energy services to retail and wholesale
customers in the State of Texas. W Power provides energy products and services
to approximately 2,000 retail electricity customers ranging from residential and
small business customers to large commercial, industrial and
governmental/institutional customers. During 2006, W Power delivered
approximately 78,690 Megawatt Hours ("MWhrs") of electricity to its retail
customers, and 34,192 MWhrs of electricity to its un-affiliated wholesale
customers. Our business operations consist primarily of providing retail
electricity to retail customers and providing wholesale energy as a qualified
scheduling entity ("QSE") or power marketer to competitive retail electricity
providers.
Priority Power provides electricity aggregation services in Texas, and either is
or has performed electricity and natural gas procurement, energy risk
management, and energy consulting in an additional 21 states. Priority Power
currently manages approximately 3,500,000 MWhrs of electricity and 22 bcf
(billion cubic feet) of physical and financial natural gas annually for its
approximately 800 customers. Additionally, ChooseEnergy.com provided retail
electricity brokering services to an additional 2,000 residential and 80
commercial customers during 2006.
6
The Properties are operated by TCTB Management, LLC an in-house management team
which oversees all operations of both the Bank of America Tower and the Century
Plaza Tower. Management currently has a team of four maintenance workers, who
assist and oversee in the Properties repairs and daily maintenance. Management
employs a property manager who is responsible for the accounting functions of
the Properties, letting of space and corresponding with the tenants and the
building maintenance crew for any tenant complaints. Due to the close proximity
of the Properties to one another management has been able to utilize the
in-house maintenance crew and the property manager in each of the Properties.
Retail Electricity
W Power is responsible for its customer's account initiation and termination as
well as energy supply management, scheduling, billing/remittance processing, and
customer service. ERCOT oversees all aspects of the Texas power grid, and all
retail electric providers must be certified by ERCOT to operate in the Texas
markets. ERCOT was founded in 1970 to oversee the Texas power grid and under
deregulation ERCOT serves as the Independent System Operator of the power grid
in Texas and enables retail providers, generators, transmission and distribution
service providers, and ultimately customers, to operate in a deregulated
marketplace in Texas. ERCOT is continuously performing five major processes to
support the retail provider:
o Customer Registration
o Market Operations
o Power Operations
o Load Profiling, Date Acquisition and Aggregation
o Settlements, Billing and Financial Transfer
ERCOT is responsible for establishing and managing market operating procedures
and protocols, and developing and managing electronic transactions by and
between the power generators, the retail electric providers, and the
transmission and distribution company. These transactions include customer
switching and registration, meter reading, regulated tariff delivery, invoicing,
and financial market settlement.
W Power performs all customer registration, switching, and termination of
service directly with ERCOT, facilitated by a third-party electronic data
interchange provider who insures the electronic transactions are compliant with
then-current ERCOT protocols. W Power uses proprietary software developed and
owned by a third-party provider to initiate ERCOT electronic transactions,
capture data sent directly or indirectly by ERCOT or the delivery companies,
initiate billing, track and manage receivables, and provide general customer
information system functions for managerial reporting and decision making.
Our customer service function is performed internally with customer service
representatives able to provide service via the telephone, fax and email. W
Power performs all steps of monthly customer billing and remittance.
Wholesale Energy
W Power is a registered Power Marketer in Texas. A power marketer is an entity
that owns electric energy in Texas for the purpose of selling the electric
energy at wholesale prices but does not own generation, transmission, or
distribution facilities and does not have a certificated service area. W Power,
as a power marketer and an ERCOT QSE, acquires wholesale electric energy for
resale to itself and other REPs in the Texas market. W Power buys 100% of its
energy for its retail operations from its wholesale operations. W Power's
wholesale energy operations group is currently selling wholesale electricity to
W Power as well as one other REP. Sales to this external REP are not governed by
a contractual agreement, but rather a daily transaction subject to W Power being
prepaid prior to assignment of the purchased electricity.
7
Electricity Aggregation and Energy Management and Consulting
Priority Power is one of the largest electricity aggregators in Texas. Through
its exclusive end-use customer contracts, Priority Power aggregates hundreds of
customers and thousands of physical account locations and determines when to
enter the market on behalf of its clients in order to procure electricity for a
pre-determined period of time. Priority Power performs various levels of
customer service for its clients, and interfaces directly with the retail
electricity providers and transmission and distribution service providers on
their behalf. Additionally, they perform electricity and natural gas supply
procurement, tariff analysis, energy risk management, demand side management,
and energy information services and billing audits for its clients.
Online Electricity Brokering
ChooseEnergy.com is a service owned and managed by Priority Power. Its primary
business is to provide competitive electricity pricing alternatives for
residential and small commercial electricity consumers. These customers
typically do not desire the level of energy management and consulting that the
larger Priority Power commercial and industrial customers require.
ChooseEnergy.com has contracts with various retail electricity providers to whom
it provides online access to post and change electricity contracts and pricing
terms. End-use consumers select a retail electricity provider through the
internet at the ChooseEnergy.com website. Currently, ChooseEnergy.com provides
these services only in Texas. ChooseEnergy receives payment directly from the
retail electricity providers upon successful registration and switching of a
retail electric customer.
Marketing and Sales
W Power customers are acquired through outside sales channels of electricity
aggregators and brokers, as well as referrals from existing customers and
relationship marketing. These channels provide a cost-effective means of
customer acquisition in the commercial and residential markets. The outside
sales channels typically have an exclusive agreement with an end-use customer to
assist with the selection of a REP. W Power competes aggressively to attract
quality customers through these channels. W Power has made a conscious decision
not to initiate a large-scale marketing plan, or develop a significant internal
sales and marketing organization consistent with its controlled growth strategy.
Priority Power clients are acquired through targeted sales calls, word of mouth
referrals, industry trade association endorsements, and relationship marketing.
ChooseEnergy.com uses traditional newspaper, radio, and television advertising,
as well as paid internet search advertising to attract customers.
Electricity Supply
W Power is certified by ERCOT to engage in both retail and wholesale marketing
activities. We serve as our own QSE which involves the procurement, scheduling,
and financial settlement of energy for our retail customer portfolio. Currently,
W Power anticipates purchasing power from any and all wholesale power generation
companies based on competitive purchase price offerings. Scheduling and market
settlements are facilitated through ERCOT, while bilateral energy purchases and
payments are negotiated in the open market. W Power may enter into forward
transactions for the delivery of fixed energy volumes for a specified term, and
possibly, use shorter term (typically month-ahead) swaps in which W Power
purchases natural gas and delivers it to an electricity producer or marketer in
exchange for electricity when it believes that market conditions are
appropriate. These gas-for-power swaps may reduce the working capital and
collateral requirements to the benefit of W Power.
We forecast our energy demand and purchase electricity through an experienced
team of in-house professionals. The energy consumption forecast for our customer
portfolio is based on historical load data, anticipated weather conditions,
customer acquisition and attrition rates, and ERCOT projected load profile
models. We continuously monitor and update our supply positions based on our
retail demand forecasts and market conditions. Our objective is to maintain a
balanced supply/demand book to limit commodity price risk exposure. W Power does
not plan to engage in speculative trading.
8
Energy Supply Management and Consulting
Priority Power is a registered aggregator in Texas. In this role, it maintains
relationships with retail electric providers and natural gas marketers and
producers. Priority Power negotiates price, contract terms and conditions, and
service levels with energy providers on behalf of their end-use consuming
clients. Through power-of-attorney clauses, Priority Power executes binding
energy supply contracts for many of its aggregation clients.
Competition
For the Company's retail electric provider, W Power, the competitors broadly
fall in two categories. The first category consists of the Affiliated REPs who
are the incumbent suppliers to their respective "Price-To-Beat" customers
(residential and small commercial) in specific geographic locations. As noted
above in Item 1 under "Impact of Government Regulation and Environmental Laws",
the ability for the Affiliated REPs to compete on price in their incumbent
markets is dictated by specific rules. However, in all cases, the Affiliated
REPs enjoy the highest levels of brand recognition and familiarity, requiring
competitive REPs, including W Power, to convince customers to switch their
service away from the Affiliated REPs. The Affiliated REPs include: TXU Energy,
Reliant Energy, First Choice Power, WTU Retail Energy, and CPL Retail Energy.
The latter two Affiliated REPs are owned by Direct Energy, a unit of Centrica
PLC. Outside of their incumbent markets, these Affiliated REPs compete in the
same regulatory environment as does W Power.
The second category of competitors is independent REPs and includes but is not
limited to, Green Mountain Energy, Cirro Energy, Strategic Energy, Constellation
Energy, Tractebel Energy Services, and Champion Energy. Some of the REPs choose
to compete only in the small commercial segment, while others compete in the
residential, small commercial, and industrial segments. The sizes of these REPs
vary as do their approaches to the market.
While the Affiliated REPs have substantial size, substantial resources, and are
adept at guiding the regulatory process in their favor, we believe that the
independent REPs provide the greatest competitive threat to W Power. Retail
profit margins in the Texas market have declined as wholesale prices of energy
have climbed. Price competition in certain market segments has increased due to
a number of new REPs, such as W Power, entering the market. In select cases we
believe there are REPs selling below the prevailing market cost in order to
acquire certain customers.
The Company believes its energy supply management and consulting
business--Priority Power--is currently one of the largest electricity
aggregators in Texas. Competitors include Lower Power Bill, PoCo Energy Group,
Teague Energy Services, Cogdill Energy Consultants, Summit Energy, Power
Brokers, and other registered and non-registered entities. The Company believes
Priority Power is the only registered aggregator to continually use aggregation
successfully for the benefit of its clients within Texas. Some of these
competitors have significantly more market share than Priority Power in states
outside of Texas.
The Company's commercial real estate business competes with a number of other
companies in providing leases to prospective tenants and in re-letting space to
current tenants upon expiration of their respective leases. If our tenants
decide not to renew or extend their leases upon expiration, we may not be able
to re-let the space. Even if the tenants do renew or we can re-let the space,
the terms of renewal or re-letting, including the cost of required renovations,
may be less favorable than current lease terms or than expectations for the
space. We may be unable to promptly renew the leases or re-let this space, or
the rental rates upon renewal or re-letting may be significantly lower than
expected rates.
Christian Statement of Faith; the Company's Policy
Article XIII of our Bylaws provides that AMEN Properties, Inc. is a "religious
corporation." Our policy is generally to include among our officers and
directors unconditionally, and among our employees where a bona fide occupation
qualification exists, only persons who, upon request, subscribe to the Company's
Christian Statement of Faith as follows:
9
1. We believe that there is one God, eternally existing in three persons: the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
2. We believe that the Bible is God's written revelation to man and that it is
verbally inspired, authoritative, and without error in the original
manuscripts.
3. We believe in the deity of Jesus Christ, His virgin birth, sinless life,
miracles, and death on the cross to provide for our redemption, bodily
resurrection and ascension into heaven, present ministry of intercession
for us, and His return to earth in power and glory.
4. We believe in the personality and deity of the Holy Spirit, that He
performs the miracle of the new birth in an unbeliever and indwells
believers, enabling them to live a godly life.
5. We believe that man was created in the image of God, but because of sin,
was alienated from God. That alienation can be removed only by accepting
through faith, God's gift of salvation which was made possible by Christ's
death.
In order to implement the Christian Statement of Faith, we intend generally to
act in accordance with the following policy, as stated in our Bylaws: "The
Corporation shall:
1. Actively seek to market the services of the Corporation to those persons,
entities, and agencies, which are actively involved in propagating a
pattern of beliefs and actions consistent with the tenets of the Statement
of Faith. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit marketing such
services to other persons, entities, or agencies except as specifically set
forth in the prohibitions or corporate action set forth below.
2. To the extent permitted by law, expend from the revenues of the Corporation
such sums as are deemed prudent by the Board of Directors to support,
encourage, or sustain persons or entities which in the judgment of the
Board of Directors are expected to make significant efforts to propagate
the Gospel of Jesus Christ in any manner not in conflict with the Statement
of Faith. Such expenditures may be made without regard to the tax status or
nonprofit status of the recipient. It is expected that the expenditures
paid out under the provisions of this paragraph shall approximate ten
percent (10%) of the amount that would otherwise be the net profits of the
Corporation for the accounting period.
The Corporation shall not:
1. Take any position publicly or privately that denies or conflicts with the
tenets of the Statement of Faith.
2. Elect, qualify or permit to serve in office as a director or officer to the
Corporation any person who has not without reservation subscribed to the
Statement of Faith as being true, accurate and correct or who having so
subscribed has either publicly or privately recanted from a particular of
the Statement of Faith or who has publicly made statements or taken actions
without repentance which the Board of Directors finds to be in clear
conflict with the Statement of Faith.
3. Hire or continue to employ any employee in any position in which, in the
sole discretion of the Corporation, subscription to the Statement of Faith
is a bona-fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the
normal operations of the Corporation's activities, where such employee
refuses, upon request, to subscribe to the Statement of Faith or having so
subscribed has either publicly or privately recanted from any particular of
the Statement of Faith or has publicly made statements or taken actions
without repentance which the Board of Directors finds to be in clear
conflict with the Statement of Faith. Because the Scriptures teach that bad
company corrupts good morals and that a little leaven affects the whole
lump, it is important to the Corporation's purposes that it be protected
from the influence of persons not in agreement with the Statement of Faith
at every level of employment.
4. Permit any party to utilize the name, goodwill, trade marks, or trade names
of the Corporation in any course of action or dealings which the
Corporation itself is herein prohibited from taking."
"In addition to any other appropriate legend, prior to its issuance each and
every share certificate to be issued by this Corporation shall be inscribed with
a legend that states:
`This Corporation is a religious corporation. All shares of this
Corporation are subject to the terms as set forth in the BYLAWS of the
corporation which restricts the amendment or deletion of that section of
the BYLAWS which prescribes a corporate Statement of Faith in the LORD
JESUS CHRIST and directs or prohibits certain corporate actions on the
basis of the Statement of Faith.'"
10
The Bylaws also state:
"No amendment to this Article XIII and no other superseding or
conflicting provision of these BYLAWS, the ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION,
or any shareholder agreement shall be adopted unless the result of the
count of votes approving the amendment is 90% affirmative without
dissension and a minimum of two-thirds of the shares outstanding are
represented and voting. Such vote must be made at an actual special
meeting of the shareholders called by written notice delivered to each
shareholder not less than 10 nor more than 60 days prior to the date of
the meeting. Time is of the essence as to this notice provision and no
extension of the time of the meeting or adjournment of the meeting to a
date outside the notice period shall be permitted except upon the
affirmative vote of not less than 70 percent of the shares then issued
and outstanding."
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
Real Estate Investment Policy
While we have not abandoned our 2002 business plan, in the near term we will
continue intend to prioritize our focus on the capital requirements of W Power
and Priority Power in order to sustain their growth. While this remains our
focus, we will continue to entertain unsolicited opportunities in real estate
and oil and gas.
Description of Real Estate and Operating Data
Prior to September 29, 2006 the Properties were owned by TCTB and managed and
operated by TCTB Company, Inc., as general partner of TCTB. AMEN initially
acquired 64.9% of the limited partnership interest of TCTB in 2002 and an
additional 6.485% effective January 1, 2004. The Properties consist of
commercial real estate in Midland, Texas.
The Company entered into an agreement to distribute assets with an effective
date of September 27, 2006, by and among the partners of TCTB. The Properties
constituted substantially all of the assets of TCTB prior to the transactions
described herein and were subject to a lien to secure a promissory note (the
"Note") payable to Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A. The partners of TCTB agreed that
it was in their best interest to distribute undivided interests in the
Properties to the partners according to the sharing ratios of the Partnership in
connection with the sale of interests in the Properties described below. The
Bank agreed to allow TCTB to distribute the Properties to the partners of TCTB
in exchange for the payoff of the Note.
Contemporaneous with the distribution of the Properties, the Company along with
the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB collectively agreed
to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest in the Properties to
Hampshire Plaza Garage, LLC and S.E.S. Investments, Ltd., unaffiliated third
party purchasers for a privately negotiated price of $9.0 million. A separate
Purchase Agreement was executed between the Buyers and TCTB as nominee for the
Selling Partners dated September 29, 2006. While beneficial title to the
Properties resided with each partner of TCTB, subsequent and pursuant to the
Agreement to Distribute Assets, the Selling Partners agreed that TCTB would
continue to hold record title to their interests in the Properties and then
transfer record title to an undivided 75% interest in the Properties directly to
Buyers in order to facilitate the closing of the Purchase Agreement which
occurred on September 29, 2006. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, TCTB, the
Selling Partners and Buyers agreed to indemnify each other against, and hold
each other harmless from all liabilities arising out of ownership, operations or
maintenance of the Properties for their respective periods of ownership.
TCTB held record title to the undivided 25% interest in the Properties
beneficially owned by the Selling Partners, including the Company's remaining
18.017% that was not included in the sale to Buyers through March 1, 2007.
Effective March 1, 2007 the Company contributed its remaining 18.017% ownership
in the Bank of America Tower and the Century Plaza Tower to HPG Acquisition,
LLC; a Texas Limited Liability Company. After the sale, TCTB, the Selling
Partners and the Buyers, as all of the owners of the Properties, entered into a
Management Agreement with TCTB Management Group, LLC ("Management") dated
September 29, 2006 relating to the management of the Properties. The Management
Agreement is effective until August 31, 2007 unless earlier terminated in
11
accordance with its terms. The owners of Management are the Selling Partners
(including the Company) and the Buyers in the same percentages as their
proportionate ownership of the Properties. Mr. Jon Morgan, President and CEO of
the Company, is the managing member of Management.
Mr. Morgan and his affiliate were among the Selling Partners and the sale of
their undivided interest in the Properties resulted in Mr. Morgan receiving a
net check in the amount of $79,317. Mr. Morgan is also an owner and officer of
the General Partner of TCTB, and took actions in such capacity in connection
with this transaction in addition to acting as an officer of the Company. As an
owner of such General Partner, Mr. Morgan indirectly received an additional
$5,300 from the sale of the General Partner's interest in the Properties.
The average lease term is 4 years and the major tenant is Bank of America. The
Bank of America Tower, where the Company's headquarters are located, was
completed in 1977 and encompasses 329,178 rentable square feet and is
approximately 84.29% occupied. It also includes a 17-lane drive through bank and
a 900 space-parking garage. The Bank of America Tower has a total of three
tenants who account for ten percent or more of the rentable space, consisting of
the bank, Pioneer Natural Resources, Inc., a public oil and gas company, and a
privately held oil and gas company. The general provisions of the leases require
TCTB to provide each tenant useable office space for a monthly fee and to
provide the maintenance, utilities, janitorial and security expenses.
Additionally, the lease agreement allows for the determination of the
incremental increases of the building operations to be passed through to the
tenants. The average annual net rental per occupied square foot was $8.94 for
the year ended December 31, 2006. Century Plaza Tower was purchased on July 30,
2004 by TCTB at a negotiated price of $436,500. Century Plaza Tower was built in
1979 and renovated in 1990. It is a twelve story high rise with 99,422 rentable
square feet and is approximately 46.99% occupied. The majority of the tenants
are on a month to month lease and the Century Plaza Tower currently has one
major tenant occupying approximately 10% of the occupied rentable square feet.
The average annual net rental per occupied square foot was $5.82 for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The Company's subsidiary, W Power, occupies the first
floor of Century Plaza Tower. A limited investment in capital improvements on
the Midland buildings in 2007 is estimated to be approximately $300,000 and
these expenditures are expected to be mainly associated with tenant improvements
and/or build outs. The Bank of America Tower and Century Plaza Tower are mainly
held for income generating capabilities. In May of 2002, the Bank of America
Tower under went an appraisal performed by the Real Estate Research Corporation.
In that appraisal, the Bank of America Tower was indicated to be in average
condition. It is management's opinion that the Century Plaza Tower is also in
average condition. The typical tenants, other than the Bank of America, are
independent oil and gas producers and financial service providers.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning lease expirations,
excluding month to month leases and assuming no renewals for each Property:
Bank of America Tower
Percentage
Number of of Total Percentage of
Lease Leases Square Feet Annualized Square Feet Total Annualized
Expiration Expiring Expiring Gross Base Rent Expiring Gross Base Rent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 14 37,866 $ 2,260,759 14.66% 37.70%
2008 7 59,389 1,416,753 22.99% 23.63%
2009 5 17,284 1,370,838 6.69% 22.86%
2010 16 111,092 768,265 43.01% 12.81%
2011 4 22,695 127,677 8.79% 2.13%
2012 6 9,957 52,512 3.86% .87%
2013 - - - - -
2014 - - - - -
2015 - - - - -
2016 - - - - -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 52 258,283 $ 5,996,804 100.0% 100.0%
===================================================================================
12
Century Plaza Tower
Percentage
Number of of Total Percentage of
Lease Leases Square Feet Annualized Square Feet Total Annualized
Expiration Expiring Expiring Gross Base Rent Expiring Gross Base Rent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 5 8,717 $ 52,791 66.35% 52.52%
2008 2 1,771 27,093 13.48% 26.95%
2009 1 2,649 20,632 20.17% 20.53%
2010 - - - - -
2011 - - - - -
2012 - - - - -
2013 - - - - -
2014 - - - - -
2015 - - - - -
2016 - - - - -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 8 13,137 $ 100,516 100.0% 100.0%
===================================================================================
The federal tax basis for the two properties is $6,386,475. Of this amount,
$4,063,742 is related to the buildings that will be depreciated, for tax
purposes, over 39 years using the straight-line method; $803,901 has been
allocated to the parking garages that will be depreciated, for tax purposes,
using the 150% declining balance method over 15 years; $104,138 has been
allocated to partitions and flooring which will be depreciated, for tax
purposes, using the 200% declining balance over 5 years; $378,006 has been
allocated to building improvements and other assets and will be depreciated, for
tax purposes, using the 200% declining balance over 7 and 5 years; $926,239 has
been allocated to tenant improvements and will depreciated, for tax purposes,
using the 200% declining balance over the life of the lease or over 39 years
using the straight-line method; and $110,449 has been allocated to land that
will not be depreciated.
The Properties are subject to an annual realty tax rate of approximately
3.19105%. For the year ending December 31, 2006 the annual realty tax was
$143,300 and $11,700 for the Bank of America Tower and the Century Plaza Tower,
respectively
As stated above, we recognize that we compete with many companies in providing
leases to prospective tenants and in re-letting space to current tenants upon
expiration of their respective leases. If our tenants decide not to renew or
extend their leases upon expiration, we may not be able to re-let the space.
Because of competitive offerings, even if the tenants do renew or we can re-let
the space, the terms of renewal or re-letting, including the cost of required
renovations, may be less favorable than current lease terms or than expectations
for the space.
In the opinion of management, the Properties are properly insured from loss
related to comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, and rental loss.
Though we believe to the best of our ability that policy specifications and
insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate, there may be
however, certain types of losses, including lease and other contract claims,
acts of war, acts of terror and acts of God that generally may not be insured.
Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could
lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in the Properties, as well
as anticipated future revenue. Though we believe that we maintain insurance
policies with carriers with sufficient assets and capital to cover all insured
perils, there may be however, failures or receiverships of carriers providing
insurance on the Properties. If this occurs, we could be essentially without
coverage for perils and losses.
13
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market Information
From January 1 to December 31, 2006, AMEN Properties, Inc.'s common stock traded
on the NASDAQ Stock Market ("NASDAQ") under the symbol "AMEN".
The following table sets forth the ranges of high and low sales prices of our
common stock for each quarter within the last two fiscal years as reported on
the NASDAQ.
High Low
-------- -------
First Quarter 2005: $ 7.49 $ 3.91
Second Quarter 2005: $ 6.59 $ 3.97
Third Quarter 2005: $ 8.04 $ 5.64
Fourth Quarter 2005: $ 6.75 $ 5.50
First Quarter 2006: $ 6.11 $ 4.50
Second Quarter 2006: $ 8.40 $ 3.80
Third Quarter 2006: $ 7.75 $ 5.42
Fourth Quarter 2006: $ 6.90 $ 5.00
January 1, 2007 through March 15, 2007 $ 9.00 $ 5.10
At March 15, 2007, the closing price for our common stock, as reported by NASDAQ
Small Cap, was $5.50 per share. There are approximately 149 holders of record of
our common stock, as of March 15, 2007. A number of such holders of record are
brokers and other institutions holding shares of common stock in "street name"
for more than one beneficial owner. The Company's transfer agent and registrar
is the American Stock Transfer and Trust Company. We have not paid and do not
currently intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future. Under the terms of the loan agreement between the Company and Western
National Bank, the Company is required to obtain consent in writing from Western
National Bank before the Company shall declare or pay any dividends.
14
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table is provided in compliance with Item 201(d) of Regulation
S-B:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan category Number of Weighted-average Number of securities remaining
securities to exercise price of available for future issuance under
be issued outstanding equity compensation plans (excluding
upon options, warrants securities reflected in column (a))
exercise of and rights
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) (b) (c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity compensation
plans approved by 291,491 $12.29 455,555
security holders
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity compensation
plans not approved None None None
security holders
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 291,491 $12.29 455,555
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
Company's audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes
presented in Item 7.
Overview
AMEN Properties, Inc., (the "Company") is a real estate and energy company
engaged in owning and managing real estate, oil and gas royalties, and energy
related business properties. The Company is a holding company and conducts its
operations through AMEN Delaware, LP ("Delaware"); AMEN Minerals, LP
("Minerals"), W Power and Light, LP ("W Power") and Priority Power Management,
Ltd ("Priority Power") each being a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As
of December 31, 2006, the Company, through Delaware's investment in a real
estate joint venture, has a commercial real estate portfolio consisting of an
ownership of approximately 18% in two office properties located in Midland,
Texas comprising an aggregate of approximately 428,560 square feet of gross
leasable area. The Company's present oil and gas royalty holdings are through
Minerals, which owns two oil and gas royalty properties, one in Nowata County,
Oklahoma and the other in Hemphill County, Texas. The Company is engaged in the
retail electricity market as a retail electric provider serving both retail and
wholesale customers within the state of Texas through W Power. Effective April
1, 2006, AMEN Properties acquired 100% of Priority Power Management, Ltd. a
Texas limited partnership, and Priority Power Management, Dallas, Ltd. a Texas
limited partnership, (collectively referred to as "Priority Power"). Priority
Power is primarily involved in providing energy management services and the
Company believes that Priority Power's business is complimentary to the retail
electricity provider business conducted by the Company's subsidiary W Power.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and
contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our
assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities where that
information is available from other sources. Certain estimates are particularly
sensitive due to their significance to the financial statements. Actual results
may differ significantly from management's estimates.
15
We believe that the most significant accounting policies that involve the use of
estimates and assumptions as to future uncertainties and, therefore, may result
in actual amounts that differ from estimates are the following:
- Impairments,
- Business combinations,
- Revenue recognition,
- Gain recognition on sale of real estate assets,
- Consolidation of variable interest entities,
- Allowance for doubtful accounts and
- Stock options
Impairments
Real estate and leasehold improvements are classified as long-lived assets held
for sale or long-lived assets to be held and used. In accordance with SFAS No.
144, we record assets held for sale at the lower of carrying value or sales
price less costs to sell. For assets classified as held and used, these assets
are tested for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the estimated carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized when expected undiscounted future cash flows from a Property is less
than the carrying value of the Property. Our estimates of cash flows of the
Properties requires us to make assumptions related to future rental rates,
occupancies, operating expenses, the ability of our tenants to perform pursuant
to their lease obligations and proceeds to be generated from the eventual sale
of our Properties. Any changes in estimated future cash flows due to changes in
our plans or views of market and economic conditions could result in recognition
of additional impairment losses.
If events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of an investment
accounted for using the equity method has declined below its carrying value and
we consider the decline to be "other than temporary," the investment is written
down to fair value and an impairment loss is recognized. The evaluation of
impairment for an investment would be based on a number of factors, including
financial condition and operating results for the investment, inability to
remain in compliance with provisions of any related debt agreements, and
recognition of impairments by other investors. Impairment recognition would
negatively impact the recorded value of our investment and reduce net income.
Business Combinations
We allocate the purchase price of acquired businesses to tangible and identified
intangible assets acquired based on their fair values in accordance with SFAS
No. 141, "Business Combinations." We initially record the allocation based on a
preliminary purchase price allocation with adjustments recorded within one year
of the acquisition.
In making estimates of fair value for purposes of allocating purchase price,
management utilizes sources, including, but not limited to, independent value
consulting services, independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection
with financing the respective business, and other market data. Management also
considers information obtained about each business as a result of its
pre-acquisition due diligence in estimating the fair value of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired.
16
The aggregate value of the tangible assets acquired is measured based on the sum
of (i) the value of the property and (ii) the present value of the amortized
in-place tenant improvement allowances over the remaining term of each lease.
Management's estimates of the value of the property are made using models
similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by
management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs such as real
estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses and estimates of lost
rentals during the expected lease-up period assuming current market conditions.
The value of the property is then allocated among building, land, site
improvements, and equipment. The value of tenant improvements is separately
estimated due to the different depreciable lives.
The aggregate value of intangible assets acquired is measured based on the
difference between (i) the purchase price and (ii) the value of the tangible
assets acquired as defined above. This value is then allocated among
above-market and below-market in-place lease values, costs to execute similar
leases (including leasing commissions, legal expenses and other related
expenses), in-place lease values and customer relationship values.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties are
calculated based on the present value (using a market interest rate which
reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference
between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases
and (ii) management's estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding
in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable
term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of
the below-market fixed rate renewal option, if any, for below-market leases. We
perform this analysis on a lease by lease basis. The capitalized above-market
lease values are amortized as a reduction to rental income over the remaining
non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market
lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term
plus the term of the below-market fixed rate renewal option, if any, of the
respective leases.
Management estimates costs to execute leases similar to those acquired at the
property at acquisition based on current market conditions. These costs are
recorded based on the present value of the amortized in-place leasing costs on a
lease by lease basis over the remaining term of each lease.
The in-place lease values and customer relationship values are based on
management's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each customer's lease
and our overall relationship with that respective customer. Characteristics
considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and
extent of our existing business relationships with the customer, growth
prospects for developing new business with the customer, the customer's credit
quality, and the expectation of lease renewals, among other factors. The
in-place lease value and customer relationship value are both amortized to
expense over the initial term of the respective leases and projected renewal
periods, but in no event does the amortization period for the intangible assets
exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.
Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place
lease value and the customer relationship value and above-market and
below-market lease values would be charged to expense.
Revenue Recognition
The Company records electricity sales under the accrual method and these
revenues are recognized upon delivery of electricity to the customers' meters.
Electric services not billed by month-end are accrued based upon estimated
deliveries to customers as tracked and recorded by the Electric Reliability
Council of Texas ("ERCOT") multiplied by the Company's average billing rate per
kilowatt hour ("kwh") in effect at the time.
The flow technique of revenue calculation relies upon ERCOT settlement
statements to determine the estimated revenue for a given month. Supply
delivered to our customers for the month, measured on a daily basis, provides
the basis for revenues. ERCOT provides net electricity delivered data in three
frames. Initial daily settlements become available approximately 17 days after
the day being settled. Approximately 45 days after the day being settled, a
resettlement is provided to adjust the initial settlement to the actual supply
delivered based on subsequent comparison of prior forecasts to actual meter
reads processed. A final resettlement is provided approximately 180 days after
power is delivered, marking the last routine settlement adjustment to the power
deliveries for that day.
17
Sales represent the total proceeds from energy sales, including pass through
charges from the TDSPs billed to the customer at cost. Cost of goods and
services ("COGS") include electric power purchased, sales commissions, and pass
through charges from the TDSPs in the areas serviced by the Company. TDSP
charges are costs for metering services and maintenance of the electric grid.
TDSP charges are determined by regulated tariffs established by the Public
Utility Commission of Texas ("PUCT").
Bilateral wholesale costs are incurred through contractual arrangements with
wholesale power suppliers for firm delivery of power at a fixed volume and fixed
price. The Company is typically invoiced for these wholesale volumes at the end
of each calendar month for the volumes purchased for delivery during the month,
with payment due 10 to 20 days after the end of the month.
Balancing/ancillary costs are based on the aggregate customer load and are
determined by ERCOT through a multiple step settlement process. Balancing
costs/revenues are related to the differential between supply provided by the
Company through its bilateral wholesale supply and the supply required to serve
the Company's customer load. The Company endeavors to minimize the amount of
balancing/ancillary costs through its load forecasting and forward purchasing
programs.
The Company's gross revenues for energy management services provided to our
customers are recognized upon delivery and include estimated aggregation fees
and other services delivered but not billed by the end of the period.
Accrued unbilled aggregation revenues are based on our estimates of customer
electricity usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the
independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Volume
estimates are based on average daily volumes, estimated customer usage and
applicable customer aggregation rates. Unbilled aggregation revenues are
calculated by multiplying volume estimates by our estimated rates by customer.
Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage and rates are known and billed.
Leases with tenants are accounted for as operating leases. Minimum annual
rentals are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective
leases.
Gain Recognition on Sale of Real Estate Assets
We perform evaluations of each real estate sale to determine if full gain
recognition is appropriate in accordance with SFAS No. 66, "Accounting for Sales
of Real Estate". The application of SFAS No. 66 can be complex and requires us
to make assumptions including an assessment of whether the risks and rewards of
ownership have been transferred, the extent of the purchaser's investment in the
property being sold, whether our receivables, if any, related to the sale are
collectible and are subject to subordination, and the degree of our continuing
involvement with the real estate asset after the sale. If full gain recognition
is not appropriate, we account for the sale under an appropriate deferral
method.
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
We perform evaluations of each of our investment partnerships, real estate
partnerships and joint ventures to determine if the associated entities
constitute a Variable Interest Entity, or VIE, as defined under Interpretations
46 and 46R, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," or FIN 46 and 46R,
respectively. In general, a VIE is an entity that has (i) an insufficient amount
of equity for the entity to carry on its principal operations, without
additional subordinated financial support from other parties, (ii) a group of
equity owners that are unable to make decisions about the entity's activities,
or (iii) equity that does not absorb the entity's losses or receive the benefits
of the entity. If any one of these characteristics is present, the entity is
subject to FIN 46R's variable interests consolidation model.
Quantifying the variability of VIEs is complex and subjective, requiring
consideration and estimates of a significant number of possible future outcomes
as well as the probability of each outcome occurring. The results of each
possible outcome are allocated to the parties holding interests in the VIE and,
based on the allocation, a calculation is performed to determine which party, if
any, has a majority of the potential negative outcomes (expected losses) or a
majority of the potential positive outcomes (expected residual returns). That
party, if any, is the VIE's primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate
the VIE. Calculating expected losses and expected residual returns requires
modeling potential future results of the entity, assigning probabilities to each
potential outcome, and allocating those potential outcomes to the VIE's interest
holders. If our estimates of possible outcomes and probabilities are incorrect,
it could result in the inappropriate consolidation or deconsolidation of the
VIE.
18
For entities that do not constitute VIEs, we consider other GAAP, as required,
determining (i) consolidation of the entity if our ownership interests comprise
a majority of its outstanding voting stock or otherwise control the entity, or
(ii) application of the equity method of accounting if we do not have direct or
indirect control of the entity, with the initial investment carried at costs and
subsequently adjusted for our share of net income or less and cash contributions
and distributions to and from these entities.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our accounts receivable balance is reduced by an allowance for amounts that may
become uncollectible in the future. Our receivable balance is composed primarily
of rents and operating cost recoveries due from its tenants; billed and unbilled
customer retail electricity usage flowed for a given period and billed and
unbilled customer management fees based on electricity usage flowed for a given
period. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed at least quarterly for
adequacy by reviewing such factors as the credit quality of our tenants and
customers, any delinquency in payment, historical trends and current economic
conditions. If the assumptions regarding our ability to collect accounts
receivable prove incorrect, we could experience write-offs in excess of the
allowance for doubtful accounts, which would result in a decrease in net income.
The Company estimated the allowance for doubtful accounts related to W Power's
billed account receivables to be approximately 0.2% percent of W Power's retail
electricity billed revenue for the period ended December 31, 2006. Due to the
limited historical data, the Company regularly reviews the accounts receivable
and accordingly makes adjustments in estimating the allowance for doubtful
accounts. Priority Power's trade accounts receivable arise from aggregation fees
and other management services. An allowance for uncollectible accounts
receivable is provided for amounts not expected to be collectible. At December
31, 2006, no allowance was provided for Priority Power's accounts receivable due
to the limited captured historical data related to the estimated aggregation
fees and other services delivered but not billed by the end of the period. As of
December 31, 2006 the Company considers Priority Power's accounts receivable to
be fully collectible; accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts is
required.
Stock Options
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS
No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. In December 2004, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 123(R) effective for small
business issuers after December 15, 2005. The new Statement requires mandatory
reporting of all stock-based compensation awards on a fair value basis of
accounting. Generally, companies are required to calculate the fair value of all
stock awards and amortize that fair value as compensation expense over the
vesting period of the awards.
Results of Operations Full Year 2006 Compared to Full Year 2005
Market share for W Power in 2006 was lower than Management's initial
expectations during its founding in 2004. Consistent with Management's previous
discussion of undertaking a deliberate and controlled growth strategy after the
extreme price volatility in energy markets during 2005, W Power did not grow its
market share appreciably during 2006. W Power focused on growth in segments
which provided an opportunity for relatively larger gross profit margins or
reduced exposure to wholesale price volatility. Additionally, W Power did not
compete aggressively on price when it appeared other REPs were selling at or
below prevailing market prices. W Power was successful in its efforts to improve
its profitability throughout 2006, which was also its first full year of
operations coming out of a startup mode during 2005. In addition, W Power was
successful in providing wholesale energy procurement services which reduced
market price volatility risk, but also increased counterparty credit
concentration risk. Management is pleased with the controlled growth strategy of
W Power and its ability to achieve profitability for the entire fiscal year of
2006. We are still concerned with reduced generating capacity reserve margins in
Texas and believe a continued environment of extreme price volatility during the
coming years is likely. Management believes W Power will continue to pursue its
controlled and deliberate growth strategy in an effort not to exceed its credit
capacity and market risk tolerance.
19
W Power continues to be challenged by higher and volatile commodity energy
prices which increase the amount of capital requirements to hedge forward its
electricity purchases using the Company's available cash and credit facilities.
Additionally, contracting with customers for longer terms at current prices
increases the risk associated with bad debt, particularly if prices were to
decline sharply.
We continue to believe the largest risks facing W Power are managing its growth
wisely and maintaining sufficient credit availability to support that growth.
Even with continued deliberate limiting of its growth, the Company's business
model leads management to expect earnings from operations, before income tax,
depreciation and amortization, to be positive for 2007, just as with 2006.
The Company's newly acquired subsidiary, Priority Power, generated approximately
$933,000 of net income for the nine months ended December 31, 2006. Management
believes that Priority Power is well positioned for growth through expansion and
acquisitions, which may occur during 2007and beyond. In addition, Management
expects earnings from operations before income tax, depreciation and
amortization to be positive for 2007.
Overview
--------
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company showed net income of
$2,161,158 or $.94 per share as compared to a net loss of $704,562, or $.32 per
share for the same period ended December 31, 2005, for a change of approximately
$2,866,000. This change is primarily due to the Company's distribution and
simultaneous sale of approximately 74% its undivided interest in the Bank of
America Tower and Century Plaza buildings on September 27, 2006. This
transaction resulted in a gain of approximately $1,405,000. On May 25, 2006 the
Company completed the acquisition of 100% of Priority Power Management,
effective April 1, 2006. For the nine months ended December 31, 2006, Priority
Power Management generated approximately $933,000 of net income. Additionally, W
Power generated approximately $528,000 in net income for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as compared to a net loss of approximately $351,000 for the
period ending December 31, 2005.
Revenues
--------
The Company's consolidated revenues were $15,056,800 for the period ending
December 31, 2006, compared to $10,180,892 for the period ending December 31,
2005. This significant increase was due primarily to the Company completing the
acquisition of 100% of Priority Power Management, effective April 1, 2006.
Additionally, W Power generated revenue of approximately $10,490,000 and
$7,172,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for an
increase of approximately $3,318,000. This increase is mainly due to W Power
having a full year of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to W Power beginning operations in the early part of 2005.
The Company's rental revenue from TCTB decreased for the period ending December
31, 2006 over the same period ending December 31, 2005 by approximately $
590,000. This decrease is mainly due to the Company entering into an Agreement
to Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd and
contemporaneous with the distribution of the Properties, the Company along with
the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB collectively agreed
to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest in the Properties.
The Company continues to have significant involvement in the operations of the
real estate. The Company began accounting for its remaining 18.017% ownership in
the real estate using the equity method of accounting during the third quarter
of 2006. Further discussion of the Company's real estate properties can be found
in Item 2.
Operating expenses
------------------
Total operating expenses for the period ending December 31, 2006 and 2005 were
$13,689,993 and $10,182,561, respectively. The increase of approximately
$3,507,000 in operating expense is mainly related to the Company's acquisition
of Priority Power Management effect April 1, 2006 and an increase in W Power's
cost of goods and services. W Power's increase in cost of goods and services is
mainly related to W Power having a full twelve months of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2006 as compared to W Power beginning operations in the early
part of the year ended December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2006, the Company
accrued the corporate tithing, as required by the Company's by-laws. The accrued
20
tithing was approximately $240,000 or 10% of the Company's net profits for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Management expects to pay the tithing during the
second and third quarter of 2007. Additionally, the Company experienced a
decrease in the building operating expenses mainly due to the Company entering
into an Agreement to Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB
Partners, Ltd and contemporaneously with the distribution of the Properties, the
Company along with the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB
collectively agreed to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest
in the Properties. The Company continues to have significant involvement in the
operations of the real estate and began accounting for its remaining 18.017%
ownership in the real estate using the equity method of accounting during the
third quarter of 2006. Further discussion of the Company's real estate
properties can be found in Item 2.
W Power's cost of goods and services were approximately $9,421,000 and 6,923,619
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively or 89.8% and 96.5%
of retail electricity sales for the period ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. W Power's gross profit was approximately $1,069,000 and $248,000
for the period ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively or 10.2% and 3.5%
of retail electricity sales for the period ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The increase of approximately 6.7% is mainly due to a decrease in
the levels of wholesale electricity and natural gas price escalation and
volatility during the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Rental property operations and depreciation expense experienced a decrease of
approximately $290,000 and $61,000, respectively, for the year ended December
31, 2006 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in the
property operations and depreciation is attributable to the Company entering
into an Agreement to Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB
Partners, Ltd and contemporaneous with the distribution of the Properties, the
Company along with the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB
collectively agreed to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest
in the Properties. The Company continues to have significant involvement in the
operations of the real estate. The Company began accounting for its remaining
18.017% ownership in the real estate using the equity method of accounting
during the third quarter of 2006. Further discussion of the Company's real
estate properties can be found in Item 2.
For the year ended December 31, 2006 general and administrative costs increased
approximately $1,120,000 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. This
increase is primarily associated with Company's acquisition of Priority Power
Management, Ltd. effective April 1, 2006. General and administrative expense
associated with Priority Power Management, Ltd. amounted to approximately
$991,000. Additionally, W Power and the Company's corporate office experienced a
combined increase of approximately $128,000 in general and administrative
expense mainly related to payroll expense.
Other (expense) income
----------------------
For the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended December 31,
2005 the Company incurred an increase of approximately $1,466,000 in other
income (expense). The increase is mainly related to the Company entering into an
Agreement to Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd
and contemporaneously with the distribution of the Properties, the Company along
with the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB collectively
agreed to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest in the
Properties. The sale of approximately 75% of the Company's undivided interest in
the properties resulted in a gain of approximately $1,405,000. The Company
continues to have significant involvement in the operations of the real estate
and began accounting for its remaining 18.017% ownership in the real estate
using the equity method of accounting during the third quarter of 2006. Further
discussion of the Company's real estate properties can be found in Item 2.
Additionally, interest income was $227,996 and $71,017 for or the year ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase of approximately $157,000
is related to the interest the Company received on the restricted deposits with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. totaling approximately $2,197,000 collateralizing
outstanding Letters of Credit (See Note E to the financial statements for
further explanation).
Minority interest
-----------------
Minority interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was
$60,248 and $91,341, respectively, and reflects the minority interest owners of
TCTB. The decrease in minority interest is related to Company entering into an
Agreement to Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd
and contemporaneously with the distribution of the Properties, the Company along
with the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB collectively
agreed to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest in the
Properties. The Company continues to have significant involvement in the
operations of the real estate and began accounting for its remaining 18.017%
ownership in the real estate using the equity method of accounting during the
third quarter of 2006. Further discussion of the Company's real estate
properties can be found in Item 2.
21
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities
--------------------
During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities was $744,836 and $(459,984), respectively. The net
increase of approximately $1,205,000 provided by operating activities is mainly
associated with the Company's acquisition of Priority Power Management effect
April 1, 2006. W Power generated net income of approximately $528,000 and
Priority Power Management generated net income for the nine months ended
December 31, 2006 of approximately $933,000.
Investing activities
--------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $7,788,413 and
($1,971,773) for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for a
net increase of approximately $9,760,000. Effective September 27, 2006, the
Company entered into an Agreement to Distribute Assets with and among the
partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd. and contemporaneously with the distribution of
the Properties, the Company along with the General Partner and the other Limited
Partners of TCTB collectively agreed to sell and sold 75% of their collective
undivided interest in the Properties. The Company received approximately
$6,400,000 in sales proceeds from the Company's sale of 74% of its interest in
the distributed properties. The distributed assets constituted substantially all
of the assets of TCTB and were subject to a lien to secure a promissory note
payable to Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A. The partners of TCTB agreed that it was
in their best interest to distribute undivided interests in the assets to the
partners according to the sharing ratios of the Partnership. The Bank agreed to
allow TCTB to distribute the assets to the partners of TCTB in exchange for the
payoff of the note. Prior to the distribution the Company had the $2,100,000
certificate of deposit applied against the outstanding note with Wells Fargo
Bank, Texas N.A. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2006, the
Company completed the acquisition of 100% of Priority Power Management, Ltd.
This acquisition resulted in the Company receiving a net increase in cash of
approximately $283,000 and incurring a non-cash related note payable in the
amount of $3,230,051. A non-cash distribution related to the asset distribution
of TCTB amounted to $369,250 and was a reduction in minority interests.
Financing activities
--------------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities was ($6,180,469) and
$388,285 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for a net
change of approximately $6,569,000. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the
Company paid approximately $6,506,000 in principal payments on the Company's
outstanding notes (see Note M to the financial statements for further
explanation). During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company received
approximately $337,000 in net proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants
issued on February 3, 2005, to the accredited investors in the private placement
under Regulation D for the new Series C Preferred Stock. Additionally, during
the year ended December 31, 2006, minority interest distributions were
approximately $36,500 and minority interest contributions were approximately
$25,000. Minority interest distributions and contributions were related to the
minority interest owners in TCTB.
Net operating loss
------------------
Currently, the Company has a net operating tax loss ("NOL") carry forward in
excess of $30 million. This NOL is primarily related to the Company's operations
prior to the Company presenting the 2002 business plan to shareholders.
Management believes the present value of this NOL is in between $2.5 to $5
million and has been diligent in its efforts to ensure its preservation for
eventual use. The Company believes that the utilization, without limitation, of
the Company's NOL will be determined by the ability of management to limit the
issue of new equity due to IRC Section 382 restrictions. However, if an
opportunity presents itself that would be more valuable to the shareholders than
the approximate $2.5 to $5 million present value we have assigned the NOL we
will strongly consider pursuing the deal and would consider issuing equity to do
so.
22
Working capital
---------------
At December 31, 2006, the Company had working capital and investments of
$4,139,147 comprised of cash of $4,457,208, accounts receivable of $1,373,356
other current assets of $25,626 less current liabilities of $1,717,043. On
February 28, 2005, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Western
National Bank, Midland, Texas. The loan agreement is a Revolving Line of Credit
in an amount of $5,000,000. Under the loan agreement the Bank may, but is not
obligated to, advance more than $2,500,000 subject to a borrowing base equal to
the lesser amount of: (a) $5,000,000 or (b) seventy-five percent (75%) of the
eligible customer receivables of the Company and its subsidiary W Power. The
loan agreement is secured by a security agreement covering all of the accounts
receivable of W Power. In addition, the loan agreement is guaranteed by
purchasers of the Company's Series C Preferred Stock on March 1, 2005 whose
guarantees are partially secured by letters of credit. As of March 23, 2006 the
Company has not utilized the loan agreement with Western National Bank and
believes that its utilization plus cash flow from operations will be sufficient
to meet the Company's anticipated needs over the next twelve months. See the
discussion below in 2007 Outlook for further detail of expected cash flow. There
can be no assurance that current working capital arrangements will be sufficient
to meet the Company's needs or that additional financing will be available to
the Company or that such financing will be available with acceptable terms.
2007 OUTLOOK
The following information is presented based upon the Company's knowledge of our
current operations and pro forma projections for W Power, Priority Power and the
Company's real estate operations.
Anticipated operations for W Power - The Company's projections for W Power in
2007 anticipate capital requirements of approximately $4,000,000 to finance
electricity procurement, business development activities, and capital
requirements. The Company's business model leads management to expect earnings
from operations, before income tax, depreciation and amortization, to be
positive for 2007. The Company believes that it has positioned itself to meet
the expected capital requirements of W Power with (1) existing available cash,
and (2) the ability to secure borrowings under a working capital-type loan
agreement as put in place in 2005/2006 with Western National Bank, Midland,
Texas. Under that loan agreement, the Bank may, but is not obligated, to advance
more than $2,500,000. Borrowings under the loan agreement are subject to a
borrowing base equal to the lesser amount of $5,000,000 or seventy-five (75%) of
the eligible customer receivables of the Company and its subsidiary W Power.
While the Company believes it will allow the current agreement to expire during
2007 without renewal, we also believe we can successfully replace or renew that
agreement at such time as deemed necessary to fund the projected capital
requirements for W Power. The Company believes its sources of funding will be
adequate to meet W Power's 2007 needs so long as commodity prices remain at or
below their current price levels, W Power exercises a controlled growth
strategy, and the existing retail and wholesale customer bases remain largely
unchanged. However, if new circumstances or unforeseen events occur the Company
may not be able to meet its capital requirements from its current sources, or
may be unable to secure a new working capital loan.
W Power anticipates gross billings during 2007 for both retail and wholesale
electricity of approximately $12,000,000. Cash expenditures for general and
administrative costs related to W Power operations are estimated to be $800,000.
Regulated tariff charges for delivery of the retail electricity are estimated to
be $1,000,000 and commodity and ancillary costs associated with procuring
wholesale energy are expected to be about $10,000,000. If electricity prices
steeply decline W Power could accelerate its growth, while a steady increase in
prices could contribute to W Power deliberately constraining its growth further
and perhaps even losing some or all its profitability.
Priority Power - Priority Power anticipates gross billings during 2007 of
approximately $2,500,000 from its aggregation and energy management services.
General and administrative expense for its associated operations are expected to
be $1,300,000.
Current real estate operations - Based primarily upon historical performance of
the real estate operations in Midland Texas, the Company anticipates operating
results from the Company's real estate operations in 2007 to produce
approximately $175,000 in positive cash flow from operations, net to AMEN's
18.017% ownership. As discussed above, the Company continues to have significant
involvement in the operations of the real estate and began accounting for its
remaining 18.017% ownership in the real estate using the equity method of
accounting during the third quarter of 2006.
23
Regarding anticipated cash outflows in 2007 for the corporate expenses, we are
estimating total cost to maintain our public company status to be approximately
$250,000 annually, which includes NASDAQ fees, audit fees, legal expenses,
public filing fees, directors and officers insurance and costs related to the
annual shareholders meeting. Because the majority of our officers have agreed
not to take a salary, our corporate general and administrative cash outlays are
expected to be $225,000. This amount is mainly cash outlays for salary and
benefits for our Chief Financial Officer.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain information in this section may contain "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of Section 21e of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact are
"forward-looking statements" for purposes of these provisions, including, but
not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenues or other financial items,
any statements of the plans and objectives of management for future operations,
any statements concerning proposed new products or services, any statements
regarding future economic conditions or performance, and any statement of
assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, "forward-looking
statements" can be identified by the use of terminology such as "may," "will,"
"expects," "believes," "plans," "anticipates," "estimates," "potential," or
"continue," or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although
the Company believes that the expectations reflected in its forward-looking
statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations or
any of its "forward-looking statements" will prove to be correct, and actual
results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the Company's
"forward-looking statements." Our financial condition and results, as well as
any other "forward-looking statements," are subject to inherent risks and
uncertainties, including but not limited to those risk factors summarized below.
Risk Factors
Lack of Operating History
In recent years, the Company has substantially changed its business plan. As a
result, the Company's operating history under its current business plan is
limited. In addition, one of the Company's subsidiaries is a recent start-up
electricity retail business with approximately two years of operating history.
Such limited operating history of the Company and its subsidiaries may not
provide sufficient information for Purchasers to base an evaluation of likely
performance.
Dependence On Key Personnel
The Company depends to a large extent on the services of its executive officers
and the officers and managers of its subsidiaries. Particularly, the Company's
subsidiaries of W Power and Priority Power are both heavily dependent upon the
knowledge and expertise of the respective President and senior managers. The
loss of the services of any of those persons could have a material adverse
effect on the Company and its subsidiaries.
Competition
The Company and its subsidiaries encounter substantial competition in acquiring
rental property and oil and gas royalties, leasing rental space, and securing
trained personnel. Most competitors have substantially larger financial
resources, staffs and facilities than the Company and its subsidiaries, and the
Company and its subsidiaries may be at a significant disadvantage in many
competitive situations. See also "Reliance Upon New Business - The Retail
Electricity Market is Highly Competitive."
24
Adverse Market Conditions
The economic performance and value of the Company's properties are subject to
all of the risks associated with owning and operating real estate, including
o changes in the national, regional and local economic climate
o the attractiveness of our properties to tenants
o the ability of tenants to pay rent
o competition from other available properties
o changes in market rental rates
o the need to periodically pay for costs to repair, renovate and re-let
space
o changes in operating costs, including costs for maintenance, insurance
and real estate taxes
o changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those
governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes
Failure By Tenants To Make Rental Payments
The performance of the Company's real estate investments will depend on our
ability to collect rent from tenants. At any time our tenants may experience a
change in business conditions or a downturn in their business that may
significantly weaken their financial condition. As a result, our tenants may
delay a number of lease commencements, decline to extend or renew a number of
leases upon expiration, fail to make rental payments when due under a number of
leases, close a number of offices or declare bankruptcy. Any of these actions
could result in the termination of the tenants' leases and the loss of rental
income.
Acquisitions Of Properties May Not Yield Expected Returns
Newly acquired properties may fail to perform as expected. Management may
underestimate the costs necessary to bring acquired properties up to standards
established for their intended market position. In addition, we may not achieve
expected cost savings and planned operating efficiencies. Acquired properties
may not perform as well as we anticipate due to various factors, including
changes in macro-economic conditions and the demand for office space or oil and
gas royalties. As the Company grows, we have to invest further in overhead to
assimilate and manage a portfolio of potentially unrelated properties.
We may face significant competition for acquisitions of properties, which may
increase the costs of acquisitions. We may compete for acquisitions of, and
investments in, properties with an indeterminate number of investors, including
investors with access to significant capital such as domestic and foreign
corporations and financial institutions, publicly traded and privately held
REITs, private institutional investment funds, investment banking firms, life
insurance companies and pension funds. This competition may increase prices for
the types of properties in which we invest. In addition, the cost and
availability of capital necessary to increase our asset base and revenue
generating capability is difficult to predict and in and of itself may be a
barrier to pursuing future acquisitions.
The Company's Asset Investments Are Illiquid
Real estate property investments and oil and gas royalties generally cannot be
disposed of quickly. The Company's recent start-up electricity retail business
and newly acquired energy management subsidiary, Priority Power are illiquid.
Therefore, we may not be able to vary our mix of assets or achieve potentially
required liquidity in response to economic or other conditions promptly or on
favorable terms.
Some Potential Losses May Not Be Covered By Insurance
The Company carries insurance on our properties that we consider appropriate and
consistent with industry practices. Though we plan to assure to the best of our
ability that policy specifications and insured limits of these policies are
adequate and appropriate, there may be however, certain types of losses,
including lease and other contract claims, acts of war, acts of terror and acts
of God that generally may not be insured. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in
excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we
have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the
property. If that happened, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any
mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. Though we
plan to maintain insurance policies with carriers with sufficient assets and
capital to cover all insured perils, there may be however, failures or
receiverships of carriers providing insurance to the Company. If this occurs,
the Company could be essentially without coverage for perils and losses.
25
Ability To Service Long-Term Debt
Certain of the Company's activities are subject to risks normally associated
with debt financing. The timing and amount of cash flows could be insufficient
to meet required payments of principal and interest. We may not be able to
refinance acquired debt, which in virtually all cases requires substantial
principal payments at maturity, and, even if we can, refinancing might not be
available on favorable terms. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be
refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions,
including new equity capital, cash flow may not be sufficient in all years to
repay all maturing debt. Prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time
of refinancing, including the possible reluctance of lenders to make commercial
real estate loans, may result in higher interest rates and increased interest
expenses.
Potential Environmental Liabilities
Under various environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of
real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous
or toxic substances, including asbestos-containing materials that are located on
or under the property. Specific asbestos remediation has taken place in certain
of our rental buildings. Environmental laws often impose liability whether the
owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of those
substances. In connection with our ownership and operation of properties, we may
be liable for these costs, which could be substantial. Also, our ability to
arrange for financing secured by that real property might be adversely affected
because of the presence of hazardous or toxic substances or the failure to
properly remediate any contamination. In addition, we may be subject to claims
by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental
contamination at or emanating from our properties.
Non-Compliance With The Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Under the ADA, all public accommodations are required to meet certain federal
requirements related to physical access and use by disabled persons. While we
believe our properties comply in all material respects with these physical
requirements or would be eligible for applicable exemptions from material
requirements because of adaptive assistance provided, a determination that we
are not in compliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an
award of damages to private litigants. If we were required to make modifications
to comply with the ADA, our ability to meet financial obligations could be
adversely affected.
Potential Adverse Effects On Our Net Operating Loss ("NOL")
There are significant limitations of utilization of the NOL under applicable tax
law as it relates to a change in ownership among five-percent (5%) owners
exceeding fifty percent (50%), and a business continuity test. If we are unable
to meet these standards, utilization of the NOL could be limited or reduced to
zero.
Volatility Of Oil And Gas Prices
Anticipated results from our oil and gas royalty investments are substantially
dependent on prices of oil and gas. Prices for oil and gas are subject to large
fluctuations in response to relative minor changes in the supply of, and demand
for, oil and gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors beyond
our control. These factors include weather conditions, the economy, actions of
the government regulation, political stability in the Middle East and elsewhere,
the foreign supply of oil and gas, the price of foreign imports and the
availability of alternate fuel sources. Any substantial extended decline in the
price of oil and gas could have an adverse impact on our revenue generating
capability.
26
Uncertainty Of Estimated Oil and Gas Reserves
Estimates of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves are based upon a
number of variable factors and assumptions, which are speculative and not under
our control. Actual production and reserve data used to value future
acquisitions will be estimates only and will be subject to uncertainties.
Estimated quantities of oil and natural gas may differ considerably from amounts
actually recovered and thus future cash flows could be impaired or accelerated
beyond management's expectations.
Availability of Capital Resources
Currently, the Company's capital resources are expected to be limited to the
borrowings under its credit facility with Western National Bank and the net
income from operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries. In the event our
current capital resources are insufficient to fund our operations and capital
expenditures, the Company may be forced to seek other sources of financing,
including without limitation, incurrence of debt and issuances of additional
equity securities. There can be no assurance that such financing will be
available on terms acceptable to the Company or on any terms. If additional
financing is not available, it will have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
Reliance Upon New and Recently Acquired Businesses
The Company's recently (2004) formed Subsidiary, W Power and Light, LP, operates
in the electricity retail business and the Company's new acquired Subsidiary,
Priority Power Management, Ltd, operates in the electricity load aggregation,
natural gas and electricity procurement, energy risk management, and energy
consulting markets. In addition to the general risks discussed above, this new
business is subject to additional risks including those discussed below.
The Retail Electricity Market Is Highly Competitive.
The market for retail electricity customers is very competitive. In certain
markets, our principal competitors include the local regulated electric utility
or its non-regulated affiliate. In other markets, we face competition from
independent electric providers, independent power producers and wholesale power
providers. In most cases, our competitors have the advantage of long-standing
relationships with customers, longer operating histories and/or larger and
better capital resources. As a result, it may not be profitable for us to enter
into some markets and our ability to increase market share may be hindered.
In general, we compete on the basis of price, our commercial and marketing
skills relative to other market participants, service and our financial
position. Other factors affecting our competitive position include our ability
to obtain electricity for resale and related transportation/transmission
services. Since many of our energy customers, suppliers and transporters require
financial guarantees and other assurances regarding contract performance, our
access to letters of credit, surety bonds and other forms of credit support is
another factor affecting our ability to compete in the market.
Our Business Is Subject to Market Risks.
Unlike a traditional regulated electric utility, we are not guaranteed a rate of
return on our capital investments. Our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices
for wholesale and retail electricity in our markets and the impact of regulatory
decisions on prices charged to our customers. Market prices may fluctuate
substantially over relatively short periods of time, potentially adversely
affecting our business. Changes in market prices for electricity may result from
the following factors among others:
o weather conditions;
o seasonality;
o demand for energy commodities;
o general economic conditions;
o forced or unscheduled interruptions in electricity available;
o disruption of electricity transmission or transportation,
infrastructure or other constraints or inefficiencies;
27
o financial position of market participants;
o changes in market liquidity;
o natural disasters, wars, embargoes, acts of terrorism and other
catastrophic events; and
o governmental regulation and legislation.
Dependence Upon Third Party Providers.
The Company does not own any generating resources to supply electricity for our
retail business in this market. As a result, we must purchase all of the
generation capacity necessary to supply our retail energy business from third
parties. In addition, we depend on power transmission and distribution
facilities owned and operated by utilities and others to deliver energy products
to our customers. If transmission or distribution is inadequate or disrupted,
our ability to sell and deliver our products may be hindered. Any infrastructure
failure that interrupts or impairs delivery of electricity could have an adverse
effect on our business.
We are dependent on the transmission and distribution utilities for reading our
customers' energy meters. We also rely on the local transmission and
distribution utility or, in some cases, the independent system operator, to
provide us with our customers' information regarding energy usage; and we may be
limited in our ability to confirm the accuracy of the information. If we receive
incorrect or untimely information from the transmission and distribution
utilities, we could have difficulty properly billing our customers and
collecting amounts owed to us. Failure to receive correct and timely information
could have an adverse effect on our business.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company's revenues are derived principally from uncollateralized customer
electricity billings and rents from tenants. The concentration of credit risk in
a limited number of industries may affect its overall exposure to credit risk
because customers and tenants may be similarly affected by changes in economic
and other conditions.
Regulation of Electricity Retail Business.
The Company's electricity retail business operates in a regulatory environment
that is undergoing significant changes as a result of varying restructuring
initiatives at both the state and federal levels. We cannot predict the future
direction of these initiatives or the ultimate effect that this changing
regulatory environment will have on our business. Moreover, existing regulations
may be revised or reinterpreted and new laws and regulations may be adopted or
become applicable to our facilities or our commercial activities. Such future
changes in laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on our business.
Regulators, regional transmission organizations and independent system operators
have imposed and may continue to impose price limitations, bidding rules and
other mechanisms in an attempt to address price volatility and other issues in
power markets. If the trend toward competitive restructuring of the power market
is reversed, discontinued or delayed, our business growth prospects and
financial results could be adversely affected.
Reliance on ERCOT.
ERCOT is responsible for handling, scheduling and settlement for all electricity
supply volumes in the ERCOT Region. ERCOT plays a vital role in the collection
and dissemination of metering data from the transmission and distribution
utilities to the retail electric providers. We and other retail electric
providers schedule volumes based on forecasts, which are based, in part, on
information supplied by ERCOT. To the extent that these amounts are not accurate
or timely, we could have incorrectly estimated our scheduled volumes and supply
costs.
In the event of a default by a retail electric provider of its payment
obligations to ERCOT, the portion of the obligation that is unrecoverable by
ERCOT is assumed by the remaining market participants in proportion to each
participant's load ratio share. We would pay a portion of the amount owed to
ERCOT should such a default occur if ERCOT is not successful in recovering such
amount. The default of a retail electric provider in its obligations to ERCOT
could have an adverse effect on our business.
28
Our Strategic Plans May Not Be Successful.
The Company's retail energy business operates in the deregulated segments of the
electric power industry. The successes of our long-term strategic plans are
predicated upon the continuation of the trend toward greater competitive markets
in this industry. If the trend towards competitive restructuring of the electric
power industry is reversed, discontinued or delayed, our business could be
adversely affected.
Non-Performance By Counterparties.
Our operations are exposed to the risk that counterparties who owe us money or
commodities and services will not perform their obligations. When such parties
fail to perform their obligations, we might be forced to replace the underlying
commitment at then-current market prices. In this event, we could incur reduced
operating results or losses.
Energy Aggregation, Supply Procurement, and Consulting Services are Highly
Competitive and Relationship Driven
There are many registered and non-registered electricity aggregators in Texas.
Priority Power relies primarily on its relationships with various key decision
makers within client organizations to assure contract renewals. If new decision
makers with relationships external to Priority Power become responsible for
consultant selection, Priority Power could lose significant amounts of business.
Additionally, competitors with lower fees may lure away clients through lower
fee structures, expanded service offerings, or superior supply management
capabilities.
Concentration of Oil and Gas Customers
Priority Power has a significant concentration of customers within the oil and
natural gas industry. If that industry experiences a significant reduction in
the domestic price of energy, clients could choose not to renew aggregation and
consulting services contracts in a cost-cutting effort.
Contract and Transaction Execution Risk
Priority Power manages large volumes of energy on behalf of its clients. Through
miscommunication, incorrect data, and human error, there can be hundreds of
thousands of dollars of incremental energy expense incurred by clients. While
contractual arrangements may limit the actual monetary liability of Priority
Power for such events, the monetary damages can still be significant.
Reduction of Retail Electric Providers
Priority Power depends largely on its ability to solicit and secure alternative
pricing proposals from REPs on behalf of its clients. If REPs choose not to
participate in price solicitation, or the number of REPs diminishes such that
there are only a few well-known REPs in the market, clients may be less willing
to outsource their energy procurement needs.
Increased Retail Price Transparency
As the marketplace becomes more transparent to all end-use customers, there may
be less interest from clients in paying aggregators, brokers, and supply
management consultants to solicit pricing on their behalf.
THE FOREGOING SUMMARY OF CERTAIN CONSIDERATIONS AND RISKS DO NOT PURPORT TO BE A
COMPLETE EXPLANATION OF THE RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY.
PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD READ SEC FILINGS AND OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY
THE COMPANY BEFORE DETERMINING TO INVEST IN THE COMPANY.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Financial Statements prepared in accordance with Item 310(a) of Regulation
S-B are included in this report commencing on page 37.
29
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company has carried out an evaluation under the supervision of management,
including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the interim Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the
Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, and have reported to the Audit Committee of the
Company's Board of Directors that, management has identified certain
deficiencies in the disclosure controls and procedures. The deficiencies noted
were (a) a lack of documented control procedures (b) the lack of segregation of
duties and (c) insufficient supervision of the Company's accounting personnel.
The Company believes such deficiencies are primarily attributable to the Company
currently having only one full time employee at the corporate level. Management
believes that the deficiencies noted above do not materially interfere with the
Company's timely disclosure of information required to be disclosed by the
Company in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act 1934, as
amended, because accounting personnel and a member of management have first-hand
knowledge of the daily transactions of the Company and that first-hand knowledge
enables such personnel to accumulate and communicate such information to the
Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Therefore the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
There have not been any changes in the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures during the period covered by this report that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting.
ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III
Information Incorporated by Reference
The information required by Item 9 - Directors and Executive Officers,
Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance With Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act.; Item 10 - Executive Compensation; Item 11 - Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders
Matters (other than information concerning securities authorized for issuance
under equity compensation plans); Item 12 - Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions; and Director Independence; and Item 14 - Principal Accountant Fees
and Services, is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement,
which will be filed with the SEC no later than April 30, 2007. For information
concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans,
see "Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters - Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans" in Part II of this Form
10-KSB
30
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
------------- --------------------
3.1+ Certificate of Incorporation and Certificates of Amendments
thereto of DIDAX INC.
3.1(a)+ Certificate of Correction regarding Certificate of Incorporation
3.1(b)** Certificate of Amendment thereto of DIDAX INC.
3.2+++ Certificate of Amendment thereto of Crosswalk.com, Inc.
3.3+ Bylaws and amendments thereto of the Company
3.4 ~ Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock
3.4(a) ~~ Amended Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock
3.5 ~~ Certification of Designation for Series B Preferred Stock
3.6*** Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated
May 26, 2004
3.7@ Certificate of Designation for Series C Preferred Stock
4.1@ Form of Warrant Certificate dated March 1, 2005
10.1// Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Blue Hill Media,
Inc. dated December 13, 2002
10.2+ Form of Stock Option Agreement
10.3+ 1997 Stock Option Plan
10.4* 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended April 6, 1998
10.5* 1998 Stock Option Plan
10.6** 1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended February 26, 1999
10.7## 1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended March 3, 2000
10.8++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and A. Scott Dufford
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.9++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and John R. Norwood
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.10++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and J.M. Mineral and
Land Co. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.11++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Jon M. Morgan
Pension Plan for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29,
2000
10.12++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Stallings
Properties, Ltd. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29,
2000
10.13++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and John D. Bergman
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.14++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Julia Jones
Family Trust for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29,
2000
31
10.15++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dodge Jones
Foundation for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.16++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Soft Op, L.P.
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.17++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Lighthouse
Partners, L.P. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29,
2000
10.18++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Ray McGlothlin,
Jr. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.19++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Gary J. Lamb for
Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.20++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Frosty Gilliam,
Jr. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.21++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Bruce Edgington
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.22++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dodge Jones
Foundation for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.23++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Earl E. Gjelde
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.24++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Jon M. Morgan
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.25++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Soft Op, L.P.
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.26++ Annex to the Stock Purchase Agreement for Series A Preferred
Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.27# Agreement to Suspend Dividends and Consent of the Holders of
Series A Preferred Stock of Amen Properties, Inc. dated May 30,
2003.
10.28# Agreement to Suspend Dividends and Consent of Holders of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Amen Properties, Inc. dated May
30, 2003.
10.29^ Consent, Waiver and Amendment of the holders of Series A
Preferred Stock dated January 2005 (identical copy executed by
each holder)
10.30^ Consent, Waiver and Amendment of the holders of Series B
Preferred Stock dated January 2005 (identical copy executed by
each holder)
10.31++ Annex to the Stock Purchase Agreement for Series B Preferred
Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.35// Lease Agreement between TCTB Partners, Ltd. and Bank of America,
N.A. dated September 30, 2003.
10.36// Lease Agreement between TCTB Partners, Ltd. and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. dated April 4, 2000.
10.38### Employment and Noncompetition Agreement between the Company and
Kevin Yung dated as of July 1, 2004
32
10.41@ Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and certain
investors dated January 18, 2005, as amended by a First Amendment
dated January 28, 2005 and a Second Amendment dated February 28,
2005
10.42@ Loan Agreement between Amen Properties, Inc. and Western National
Bank
10.43@ Western National Bank Revolving Line of Credit Note
10.44 Employment Agreement between Priority Power Management, Ltd and
John Bick (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 1, 2006).
10.45 Employment Agreement between Priority Power Management, Ltd and
Padraig Ennis (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 1, 2006).
10.46 Securities Purchase Agreement among Amen Properties, Inc. and
NEMA Properties, LLC, Priority Power Management, Ltd. and
Priority Power Management Dallas, Ltd. and their respective
partners dated as of May 18, 2006, including the forms of
promissory note and assignment delivered at closing (incorporated
by reference to the Company's Form 8-K Current Report filed on
May 24, 2006).
10.47 Agreement to Distribute Assets among TCTB Partners, Ltd and its
partners dated as of September 27, 2006 (Incorporated by
reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2006)
10.48 Purchase Agreement between TCTB Partners, Ltd as nominee for
certain partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd and Hampshire Plaza
Garage, LLC and S.E.S. Investments, Ltd. dated as of September
29, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 5, 2006)
10.48 Management Agreement between the Company and TCTB Management
Group, LLC. dated as of September 29, 2006 (Incorporated by
reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2006)
11 Statement of computation of earnings per share
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed
herewith)
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 USC
ss.1350.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC
ss.1350.
99.1 Press release regarding December 31, 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB
+ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24,
1997, SEC File No. 333-25937
++ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2002, amended July 25,
2002 and August 14, 2002.
+++ Filed as an Appendix to the Company's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2003.
* Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 2, 1998, SEC File No. 333-25937
33
** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000.
*** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2004.
# Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2003.
## Filed as an Appendix to the Company's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000.
### Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004
~ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1,
2000, SEC File No. 333-49126
~~ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2002, SEC file No.
333-85636
// Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2003.
@ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2005.
34
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AMEN Properties, Inc.
May 22, 2008 By: /s/ Jon M. Morgan
---------------------------------------
Jon M. Morgan,
Chief Executive Officer
May 22, 2008 By: /s/ Kris L. Oliver
----------------------------------------
Kris L. Oliver,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
May 22, 2008 By: /s/ Kevin Yung
---------------------------------------
Chief Operating Officer
May 22, 2008 By: /s/ Eric L. Oliver
---------------------------------------
Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors
May 22, 2008 By: /s/ Bruce Edgington
---------------------------------------
Director
35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 37
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 38
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 39
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 40
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 43
36
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
-------------------------------------------------------
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Midland, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AMEN Properties,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AMEN
Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
JOHNSON MILLER & CO., CPA's PC
Midland, Texas
March 29, 2007
37
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
ASSETS
2006 2005
------------- -------------
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents (note A3) $ 4,457,208 2,104,428
Accounts receivable (notes A6 and A17), net of allowance of $ 38,470
and $40,933 in 2006 and 2005, respectively
Trade receivables, net 1,373,356 1,263,398
Related parties - 37,147
------------- -------------
Total accounts receivable, net 1,373,356 1,300,545
Current portion of note receivable - 50,000
Other current assets 25,626 198,239
------------- -------------
Total current assets 5,856,190 3,653,212
RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS (notes C and E) 2,197,000 3,655,264
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (notes A7, A8, C and F) 146,041 8,103,659
INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURE (notes, A9, C and G) 1,730,185 -
ROYALTY INTERESTS (notes A7 and H) 129,778 136,618
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS (notes A4 and I) 62,350 62,350
OTHER ASSETS
Goodwill (note B) 2,916,085 -
Deferred costs - 30,692
Deposits and other assets 61,057 10,531
------------- -------------
Total other assets 2,977,142 41,223
------------- -------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 13,098,686 15,652,326
============= =============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 595,289 1,149,127
Accrued liabilities (note J) 603,951 421,641
Deferred revenue (note A13) 30,785 50,649
Accrued interest payable 61,024 76,112
Current portion of long-term obligations (note M) 132,307 259,009
Current portion of related-party obligations (note M) 293,687 -
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities 1,717,043 1,956,538
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS, less current portion (note C, M and N)
Financial institutions and other creditors 845,921 6,336,172
Related parties obligations, less current portion 1,877,734 879,738
------------- -------------
2,723,655 7,215,910
MINORITY INTEREST (notes A15) 23,453 343,996
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (notes A20, K and O) - -
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (notes P and Q)
Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized;
80,000 Series "A" shares issued and outstanding, convertible into
a total of 616,447 shares of common stock at the option of the holders (note A16) 80 80
80,000 Series "B" shares issued and outstanding, convertible into
a total of 233,317 shares of common stock at the option of the holders (note A16) 80 80
125,000 Series "C" shares issued and outstanding, convertible into
a total of 500,000 shares of common stock at the option of the holder (note A16) 125 125
Common stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 2,290,589 and
2,206,215 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005 22,906 22,063
Additional paid-in capital 44,970,100 44,633,448
Accumulated deficit (36,358,756) (38,519,914)
Accumulated other comprehensive income - -
------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity 8,634,535 6,135,882
------------- -------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 13,098,686 15,652,326
============= =============
38
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31,
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Operating revenue
Rental revenue $ 2,418,702 3,008,669
Energy management fees 2,148,051 -
Retail electricity revenue 10,490,047 7,172,223
------------- -------------
Total operating revenue 15,056,800 10,180,892
------------- -------------
Operating expense
Cost of goods and services 9,421,434 6,923,619
Rental property operations 1,652,483 1,941,620
General and administrative 2,049,156 929,653
Depreciation, amortization and depletion 326,791 387,669
Corporate tithing 240,129 -
------------- -------------
Total operating expenses 13,689,993 10,182,561
------------- -------------
Income (loss) from operations 1,366,807 (1,669)
------------- -------------
Other income (expense)
Interest income 227,996 71,017
Interest expense (755,228) (552,567)
Gain on sale of interest in real estate (note C) 1,405,495 -
Impairment of note receivable - (186,555)
Income from real estate joint venture 42,947 -
Other income (66,611) 56,553
------------- -------------
Total other income (expense) 854,599 (611,552)
------------- -------------
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest 2,221,406 (613,221)
Income taxes (notes A12 and K) - -
Minority interest (60,248) (91,341)
------------- -------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 2,161,158 (704,562)
============= =============
Net income (loss) per common share (basic) $ .94 (.32)
============= =============
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted) $ .56 (.32)
============= =============
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic 2,290,589 2,203,073
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted 3,830,078 2,203,073
39
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
Accumulated
Other
Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Common Comprehensive
------------------- ---------------------- Paid-in Stock Accumulated Income Total
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Warrants Deficit (Loss) Equity
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 2004 160,000 $ 160 2,201,356 $ 22,014 42,481,507 127,660 (37,815,352) - 4,815,989
Preferred C stock issuance 125,000 125 - - 1,999,875 - - - 2,000,000
Common stock issued
pursuant to stock options
exercised - - 4,859 49 24,406 - - - 24,455
Expiration of stock
warrants - - - - 127,660 (127,660) - - -
Other comprehensive income - - - - - - - - -
Net (loss) - - - - - - (704,562) - (704,562)
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------- ----------
Total comprehensive
income - - - - - - (704,562) - (704,562)
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 2005 285,000 285 2,206,215 22,063 44,633,448 - (38,519,914) - 6,135,882
Common stock issued
pursuant to common stock
warrants exercised - - 84,374 843 336,652 - - - 337,495
Other comprehensive income - - - - - - - - -
Net income - - - - - - 2,161,158 - 2,161,158
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------- ----------
Total comprehensive
income - - - - - - 2,161,158 - 2,161,158
---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 2006 285,000 $ 285 2,290,589 $ 22,906 44,970,100 - (36,358,756) - 8,634,535
========== ======= ========== ========= =========== ========= ============ ============= ==========
40
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31,
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 2,161,158 (704,562)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
(used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and depletion 326,791 387,669
Impairment of note receivable - 186,555
Gain on sale of investments (1,405,495) -
Minority interest 60,248 91,341
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 357,574 (1,177,677)
Decrease in allowance for doubtful accounts (2,463) (50,133)
Other assets 154,363 (120,840)
Real estate investment (42,947) -
Deferred costs 30,692 21,665
Accounts payable (614,035) 1,034,023
Accrued and other liabilities (187,495) (108,547)
Deferred revenue (93,555) (19,478)
------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities 744,836 (459,984)
------------- -------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (402,704) (490,978)
Restricted cash equivalents (641,736) 61,469
Proceeds from sale of interest in real estate (note C) 6,399,701 -
Sales and maturity of investments 2,100,000 -
Purchase of investments - (1,555,264)
Net cash acquired in acquisition of limited
partnership interest (note B) 283,152 -
Repayments of notes receivable 50,000 13,000
------------- -------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 7,788,413 (1,971,773)
------------- -------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of notes payable (6,506,423) (1,636,170)
Net proceeds from issuance of common and preferred stock - 2,024,455
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
pursuant to common stock warrants exercised 337,495 -
Minority interest distributions (36,536) -
Minority interest contributions 24,995 -
------------- -------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (6,180,469) 388,285
------------- -------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,352,780 (2,043,472)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 2,104,428 4,147,900
------------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 4,457,208 2,104,428
============= =============
41
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
Years ended December 31,
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Cash paid during the year for:
------------------------------
Interest $ 663,511 454,791
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
--------------------------------------------
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company acquired 100%
Of Priority Power Management, Ltd. and
Assumed a note payable to sellers (see note B). $ 3,230,051 -
On September 27, 2006, the Company distributed certain
net assets to minority interest owners (see note C). $ 369,250 -
42
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE A - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1. Organization
Effective October 2002, AMEN formed NEMA Properties, LLC ("NEMA"), a Nevada
limited liability company; AMEN Minerals, LP ("Minerals"), a Delaware limited
partnership; and AMEN Delaware, LP ("Delaware"), a Delaware limited partnership,
to pursue acquisitions as authorized by stockholders on September 19, 2002. AMEN
Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries is a self-administered and self-managed
Delaware corporation. Effective July 2004, AMEN Properties, Inc. and
Subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively referred to as the "Company") formed W
Power and Light, LP ("W Power"), a Delaware limited partnership to enter into
the retail electricity market in Texas. Effective April 1, 2006, AMEN Properties
acquired 100% of Priority Power Management, Ltd. a Texas limited partnership,
and Priority Power Management, Dallas, Ltd. a Texas limited partnership,
(collectively referred to as "Priority Power"). Priority Power is primarily
involved in providing energy management services and the Company believes that
Priority Power's business is complimentary to the retail electricity provider
business conducted by the Company's subsidiary W Power.
The Company's business purpose is to acquire investments in commercial real
estate, oil and gas royalties, retail electricity operations and stabilized cash
flowing businesses or assets. As of December 31, 2006, the Company, through
Delaware's investment in a real estate joint venture, has a commercial real
estate portfolio consisting of an ownership of approximately 18% in two office
properties located in Midland, Texas comprising an aggregate of approximately
428,560 square feet of gross leasable area. Through its investment in Minerals,
AMEN has acquired an investment interest in an oil and gas royalty trust and
other oil and gas royalties. Through the Company's investment in W Power, Amen
entered the retail electricity market in the state of Texas. On April 1, 2006,
the Company, through it's investment in Priority Power, began aggregating
electric consumers and negotiating power prices on their behalf with retail
electric providers. The real estate operations of the Company are primarily
conducted through Delaware of which AMEN is the sole general partner; the retail
electricity operations are primarily conducted through W Power of which Amen is
the sole general partner; the aggregation of electric consumers is primarily
conducted through Priority Power of which Amen is the sole general partner.
2. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its majority-owned/controlled subsidiaries and affiliates. Inter-company
balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those estimates and assumptions affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the
consolidated financial statements, and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
43
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
3. Cash Equivalents
The Company considers cash on hand, cash on deposit in banks, money market
mutual funds and highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of
three months or less to be a cash equivalent.
4. Investments
The Company invests in U.S. government bonds and treasury notes, municipal
bonds, certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and other securities.
Investments with original maturities greater than three months but less than
twelve months from the balance sheet date are short-term investments. Those
investments with original maturities greater than twelve months from the balance
sheet date are long-term investments.
The Company's marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale as of
the balance sheet date, and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and
losses, net of tax, recorded in stockholders' equity. Realized gains or losses
and permanent declines in value, if any, on available-for-sale investments are
reported in other income or expense as incurred.
5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, investments, accounts
receivable, notes receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value
because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of
the fixed rate debt, based upon current interest rates for similar debt
instruments with similar payment terms and expected payoff dates, would be
approximately $3,625,000 as of December 31, 2006. Disclosure about fair value of
financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management
as of December 31, 2006.
6. Accounts Receivable
Management regularly reviews accounts receivable and estimates the necessary
amounts to be recorded as an allowance for doubtful accounts.
W Power's unbilled revenue is accrued based on the estimated amount of unbilled
power delivered to customers using the average customer billing rates. Unbilled
revenue also includes accruals for estimated Transmission and Distribution
Service Provider ("TDSP") charges and monthly service charges applicable to the
estimated usage for the period.
The Company estimated the allowance for doubtful accounts related to W Power's
billed accounts receivable to be approximately .2% percent of W Power's retail
electricity billed revenue. Due to the limited historical data, the Company
regularly reviews the accounts receivable and accordingly makes adjustments in
estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Priority Power trade accounts receivable arise from aggregation fees and other
management services. An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided, when
considered necessary by management, for estimated amounts not expected to be
collectible. No allowance was provided or deemed necessary at December 31, 2006.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, accounts receivable consisted of the following:
44
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Tenant receivables $ - 160,534
Billed electricity receivables 438,592 655,141
Unbilled electricity receivables 518,045 525,803
Aggregation fees 449,544 -
Other receivables 5,645 -
Allowance for doubtful accounts (38,470) (40,933)
------------- -------------
Accounts receivable, net $ 1,373,356 1,300,545
============= =============
7. Depreciation, Amortization and Depletion
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is determined
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives ranging from
three to 36.5 years. Royalty acquisitions are stated at cost. Depletion is
determined using the units-of-production method based on the estimated oil and
gas reserves.
8. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of
its long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles by monitoring and evaluating
changes in circumstances that may indicate that the carrying amount of the asset
may not be recoverable. Examples of events or changes in circumstances that
indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount of an asset should be
assessed include but are not limited to the following: a significant decrease in
the market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in
which an asset is used or a significant physical change in an asset, a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that
could affect the value of an asset or an adverse action or assessment by a
regulator, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount
originally expected to acquire or construct an asset, and/or a current period
operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow
losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses
associated with an asset used for the purpose of producing revenue.
The Company considers historical performance and anticipated future results in
its evaluation of potential impairment. Accordingly, when indicators or
impairments are present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of these
assets in reaction to the operating performance of the business and future
discounted and nondiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of these
assets. Impairment losses are recognized when the sum of expected future cash
flows are less than the assets' carrying value.
9. Investment in Real Estate Joint Venture
As discussed in Note C to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
sold a significant interest in certain real estate and contributed its retained
18.017% undivided ownership interest in the real estate to a joint venture in
which the Company has significant continuing involvement.
The Company's investment in real estate joint venture is recorded at its
remaining net cost, adjusted for its 18.017% joint venture share of earnings
(loss) using the equity method of accounting, and joint venture cash
contributions and distributions.
45
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
10. Goodwill
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". SFAS No. 142
requires that goodwill and other intangible assets with investment lives no
longer be amortized. The intangible assets are tested for impairment annually.
If there is impairment, the amount will be expensed and the intangible assets
will be written down accordingly.
11. Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to account
for its stock-based compensation. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board issued SFAS 123(R) effective for small business issuers after
December 15, 2005. The new Statement requires mandatory reporting of all
stock-based compensation awards on a fair value basis of accounting. Generally,
companies are required to calculate the fair value of all stock awards and
amortize that fair value as compensation expense over the vesting period of the
awards.
12. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes". Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting
and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax
rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to
reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred
tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. For the period ended December
31, 2006, no income tax expense has been incurred due to the utilization of the
Company's net operating losses.
13. Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue consists of prepaid aggregation fees. Deferred revenue is
amortized over the life of the aggregation contract for prepaid aggregation
fees.
14. Corporate Tithing
The Company shall, to the extent permitted by law, expend from the revenues of
the Company such sums as are deemed prudent by the Board of Directors to
support, encourage, or sustain persons or entities which in the judgement of the
Board of Directors are expected to make significant efforts to propagate the
Gospel of Jesus Christ in any manner not in conflict with the Statement of
Faith. Such expenditures may be made without regard to the tax status or
nonprofit status of the recipient. It is expected that the expenditures paid out
under the provisions of this policy shall approximate ten percent (10%) of the
amount that would otherwise be the net profits of the Company for the accounting
period.
15. Minority Interest
Minority interest represents the interest of unit holders of TCTB, other than
the Company, in the net earnings and net equity of TCTB. The unit holder
minority interest is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the ownership
at that time. The unit holder minority interest in TCTB was approximately 28.7%
at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
46
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
16. Contingently Convertible Securities
The Company has outstanding Series A Preferred Stock ("Series A"),
Series B Preferred Stock ("Series B") and Series C Preferred Stock
("Series C") whose terms enable the holder, under certain conditions,
to convert such securities into 1,349,764 shares of the Company's
Common Stock as shown in the following table.
Number of Number of
Series Shares Purchase Price Conversion Rate Common Shares
------ ------ -------------- --------------- ------
A 80,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3.2444 616,447
B 50,000 500,000 3.2444 154,111
B 10,000 100,000 3.424 29,206
B 20,000 200,000 4.000 50,000
C 125,000 2,000,000 4.000 500,000
Conversion of Series A, Series B and Series C is at the option of the holder
thereof, at any time and from time to time, into such number of fully paid and
nonassessable shares of Common Stock as is determined by dividing the original
Series A, Series B and Series C issue price by the conversion price in effect at
the time of conversion. The contingently convertible securities have not been
included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for any periods in
which their effect is antidilutive.
17. Revenue Recognition
The Company records electricity sales under the accrual method and these
revenues are recognized upon delivery of electricity to the customers' meters.
Electric services not billed by month-end are accrued based upon estimated
deliveries to customers as tracked and recorded by the Electric Reliability
Council of Texas ("ERCOT") multiplied by the Company's average billing rate per
kilowatt hour ("kwh") in effect at the time ("the flow technique").
The flow technique of revenue calculation relies upon ERCOT settlement
statements to determine the estimated revenue for a given month. Supply
delivered to our customers for the month, measured on a daily basis, provides
the basis for revenues. ERCOT provides net electricity delivered data in three
phases. Initial daily settlements become available approximately 17 days after
the settlement date. Approximately 45 days after the settlement date, a
resettlement is provided to adjust the initial settlement to the actual supply
delivered based on subsequent comparison of prior forecasts to actual meter
reads processed. A final resettlement is provided approximately 180 days after
power is delivered, marking the last routine settlement adjustment to the power
deliveries for that day.
Sales represent the total proceeds from energy sales, including pass through
charges from the TDSPs billed to the customer at cost. Cost of goods and
services ("COGS") include electric power purchased, sales commissions, and pass
through charges from the TDSPs in the areas serviced by the Company. TDSP
charges are costs for metering services and maintenance of the electric grid.
TDSP charges are determined by regulated tariffs established by the Public
Utility Commission of Texas ("PUCT").
Bilateral wholesale costs are incurred through contractual arrangements with
wholesale power suppliers for firm delivery of power at a fixed volume and fixed
price. The Company is typically invoiced for these wholesale volumes at the end
of each calendar month for the volumes purchased for delivery during the month,
with payment due 10 to 20 days after the end of the month.
47
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Balancing/ancillary costs are based on the aggregate customer load and are
determined by ERCOT through a multiple step settlement process. Balancing
costs/revenues are related to the differential between supply provided by the
Company through its bilateral wholesale supply and the supply required to serve
the Company's customer load. The Company endeavors to minimize the amount of
balancing/ancillary costs through its load forecasting and forward purchasing
programs.
The Company's gross revenues for aggregation and other services to our customers
are recognized upon delivery and include estimated aggregation fees and other
services delivered but not billed by the end of the period.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company recorded unbilled revenue of $206,100 for
aggregation fees. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on our estimates of
customer usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the
independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Volume
estimates are based on average daily volumes, estimated customer usage and
applicable customer aggregation rates. Unbilled revenues are calculated by
multiplying volume estimates by our estimated rates by customer. Estimated
amounts are adjusted when actual usage and rates are known and billed.
18. Advertising Expense
All advertising costs are expensed when incurred. Advertising expenses were
approximately $91,125 and $7,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
19. Income (Loss) Per Share
Income (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average common shares
and common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. The Series A,
Series B and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for any periods in which their effect
is antidilutive.
20. Environmental
The Company is subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws
and regulations. These laws regulate asbestos in buildings that require the
Company to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal of the
asbestos at the buildings.
Environmental costs that relate to current operations are expensed or
capitalized as appropriate. Costs are expensed when they relate to an existing
condition caused by past operations and will not contribute to current or future
revenue generation. Liabilities related to environmental assessments and/or
remedial efforts are accrued when property or services are provided or can be
reasonably estimated.
21. New Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This
Statement amends FASB Statement No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, and No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. This Statement resolves
issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, "Application of
Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets." The
provisions of this Statement shall be effective for financial instruments
acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006.
48
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of
Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement amends
FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. The provisions
of this Statement shall be effective as of the beginning of an entity's first
fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. The provisions of this Statement shall be
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employer's Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment to FASB
Statement No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R. This Statement improves financial reporting
by requiring an employer to recognize the over funded or under funded status of
a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an
asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize
changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
comprehensive income of a business entity or changes in unrestricted net assets
of a no-for-profit organization. An employer with publicly traded equity
securities shall initially apply the requirement to recognize the funded status
of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements as of the end of the fiscal
year ending after December 15, 2006. An Employer without publicly traded equity
securities shall initially apply the requirements as of the end of the fiscal
year ending after June 15, 2007.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to
improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to
mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and
liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value
measurement, which is consistent with the Board's long-term measurement
objectives for accounting for financial instruments. The provisions of this
Statement shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity's
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007; this Statement should not
be applied retrospectively to fiscal years beginning prior to the effective
date, except as permitted in paragraph 30 for early adoption.
Management does not believe the new pronouncements will have a material impact
on its financial statements.
49
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE B - BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On May 25, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of Priority Power
Management, effective April 1, 2006, for an aggregate consideration of
$3,730,051. Priority Power is primarily involved in providing energy management
services and the Company believes that Priority Power's business is
complimentary to the retail electricity provider business conducted by the
Company's subsidiary W Power. The acquisition resulted in the Company allocating
$2,916,085 of the purchase price to goodwill. This allocation is principally the
result of the purchase price being based on a business valuation of Priority
Power for the period ended December 31, 2005. The acquisition consisted of
$500,000 of cash paid and promissory notes totaling $3,230,051 payable to the
selling partners of Priority Power. This acquisition has been accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting and Priority Power's results of
operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 have been included in the
Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period then ended. The
purchase price has been allocated based on the estimated fair values of 100% of
the acquired partnership interests at the acquisition date as follows:
Goodwill $ 2,916,085
Fair value of fixed assets acquired 96,467
Fair value of other current assets acquired 460,201
Fair value of liabilities assumed (525,854)
Note payable to sellers (3,230,051)
-------------
Net cash acquired for the acquisition (283,152)
Less: total cash acquired 783,152
-------------
Net cash paid $ 500,000
=============
The total amount of goodwill expected to be deducted for tax purposes for the
tax year ending December 31, 2006 is $145,804.
The following summary compares the Company's operating results for the year
ended December 31, 2006 as reported, to a pro forma of those results prepared on
the assumption that the purchase had taken place on January 1, 2006.
As
Reported Proforma
------------- -------------
Revenues $ 15,056,800 15,705,804
============= =============
Net income $ 2,161,158 2,451,884
============= =============
Income per common share (basic) $ .94 1.07
============= =============
Income per common share (diluted) $ .56 .64
============= =============
Weighted average number of common shares
Outstanding - basis 2,290,589 2,290,589
============= =============
Weighted average number of common shares
Outstanding - diluted 3,830,078 3,830,078
============= =============
50
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE C - DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
Effective September 27, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement to
Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd. The assets
consisted of the following: the twenty-four-story Bank of America Tower, where
the Company's headquarters are located, which was completed in 1977 and
encompasses 329,178 rentable square feet and a 900 space-parking garage; the
related Bank of America 12-lane drive through banking facility; and the twelve
story Century Plaza Tower which was built in 1979 (renovated in 1990) and has
99,422 rentable square feet. The Properties constituted substantially all of the
assets of TCTB prior to the transactions described herein and were subject to a
lien to secure a promissory note payable to Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A. The
partners of TCTB agreed that it was in their best interest to distribute
undivided interests in the assets to the partners according to the sharing
ratios of the Partnership in connection with the sale of interests, described
below, in the assets. The Bank agreed to allow TCTB to distribute the assets to
the partners of TCTB in exchange for the payoff of the note as described below.
The asset distribution to the TCTB minority interest partners resulted in an
approximate $369,000 reduction in minority interest.
Contemporaneous with the distribution of the Properties, the Company along with
the General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB collectively agreed
to sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest in the Properties to
Hampshire Plaza Garage, LLC and S.E.S. Investments, Ltd., unaffiliated third
party purchasers for a privately negotiated price of $9.0 million. This resulted
in the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Amen Delaware, LP, selling
approximately 74% of its undivided interest in the distributed assets for
approximately $6.4 million (net proceeds of approximately $3,570,500) with a
gain on the sale of approximately $1,405,500. The sale of approximately 74% of
the Company's original 71.348% interest in the assets resulted in the Company
retaining approximately 18.017% in an investment in a real estate joint venture
aggregating $1,687,238.
A separate Purchase Agreement was executed between Buyers and TCTB as nominee
for the Selling Partners dated September 29, 2006. While beneficial title to the
Properties resided with each partner of TCTB, subsequent and pursuant to the
Agreement to Distribute Assets, the Selling Partners agreed that TCTB would
continue to hold record title to their interests in the Properties and then
transfer record title to an undivided 75% interest in the Properties directly to
Buyers in order to facilitate the closing of the Purchase Agreement which
occurred on September 29, 2006. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, TCTB, the
Selling Partners and Buyers agreed to indemnify each other against, and hold
each other harmless from all liabilities arising out of ownership, operations or
maintenance of the Properties for their respective periods of ownership
In connection with the Agreement to Distribute Assets the restricted $2.1
million certificate of deposit that secured the Note was applied to the
outstanding balance of the Note resulting in the Note balance of approximately
$3.7 million being distributed to the partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd.,
approximately $2.6 million net to the Company. The Note was subsequently paid in
full on October 2, 2006 through the application of approximately $3.9 million of
the $9.0 million sales proceeds under the Purchase Agreement received on October
2, 2006. The remaining $5.0 million of the sales proceeds (after closing costs)
were paid to the Selling Partners in accordance with their respective interests
in the Properties (approximately $3.5 million to the Company). On October 3,
2006 the Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the sale to pay the
remaining balance (approximately $1.7 million) on certain promissory notes
entered into by the Company in connection with its acquisition of partnership
interests in TCTB (including approximately $266,000 to Mr. Jon Morgan, President
and COO of the Company, and approximately $410,000 to an affiliate of Mr. Eric
Oliver, Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company. The Company plans to use
the remaining net proceeds from the sale (i) for potential real estate
acquisition or redevelopment opportunities, (ii) to fund potential capital
requirements of its electricity business subsidiaries, W Power and Light, LP and
Priority Power Management, LP, (iii) for potential purchases of oil and gas
mineral and royalty interests, and (iv) for general working capital.
51
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE D - CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
The Company maintains cash balances at four financial institutions, which at
times may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2006 and 2005 the
Company had approximately $3,514,000 and 1,475,000, respectively, of uninsured
cash and cash equivalents. The Company has not experienced any losses in such
accounts and believes that it is not exposed to any significant credit risks on
such accounts.
W Power and Priority Power's revenues are derived principally from
uncollateralized customer electricity billings and TCTB's revenues are derived
principally from uncollateralized rents from tenants. The concentration of
credit risk in a limited number of industries affects its overall exposure to
credit risk because customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic
and other conditions.
NOTE E - RESTRICTED CASH EQUIVALENTS
For the period ending December 31, 2005 the Company held a $2,100,000
certificate of deposit with a financial institution with an annual yield of
4.00% and a maturity date of December 28, 2006. The certificate of deposit
collateralized the term note with a financial institution (see note M) and was
restricted. The certificate of deposit is recorded at cost, which approximates
market value. The certificate is non-negotiable and non-transferable, and may
incur substantial penalties for withdrawal prior to maturity. Effective
September 27, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement to Distribute Assets
with and among the partners of TCTB in exchange for the payoff of the TCTB Note.
In connection with the Agreement to Distribute Assets the restricted $2.1
million certificate of deposit that secured the TCTB Note was applied to the
outstanding balance of the Note as of September 27, 2006. The Company incurred
approximately $20,500 in penalties for withdrawal prior to maturity.
On October 18, 2005, the Company entered into a continuing agreement for
commercial and standby letters of credit (the "Letters of Credit") with JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., Houston, Texas, ("JPMC"). Under the agreement JPMC may, but is
not obligated to, issue one or more standby or commercial letters of credit on
behalf of W Power. The Letters of Credit are generally required in the normal
course of business operations to support the Company's obligations to
collateralize certain obligations to electric power providers, TDSPs, and ERCOT.
Currently the Letters of Credit bear an interest rate of seven-tenths of one
percent (0.70%) payable quarterly in advance. In order to support the Letters of
Credit, the Company, JPMC and JP Morgan Securities Inc. maintain a tri-party
control agreement that creates a security interest in favor of Chase in a
certain Money Market Fund the Company maintains with JPMC. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, the Company had deposits with JPMC totaling $2,197,000 and $1,555,264,
respectively, collateralizing outstanding Letters of Credit.
52
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE F - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consisted of the following at December
31, 2006 and 2005:
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Buildings $ - 8,467,365
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 238,367 141,998
Tenant improvements - 583,099
Land - 158,998
------------- -------------
- 9,351,460
Less: accumulated depreciation (92,326) (1,247,801)
------------- -------------
$ 146,041 8,103,659
============= =============
Depreciation expense for 2006 and 2005 was $319,951 and $373,917,
respectively. Included in the $319,951 of the 2006 depreciation expense is
224,068 of depreciation related to the buildings sold on September 29, 2006
(see note C).
NOTE G - INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURE
Effective September 27, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement to
Distribute Assets with and among the partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd.
Contemporaneous with the distribution of the assets, the Company along with the
General Partner and the other Limited Partners of TCTB collectively agreed to
sell and sold 75% of their collective undivided interest in the assets. The sale
of the Company's undivided interest in the assets resulted in the Company
retaining approximate 18.017% undivided interest in the assets (see note C).
At December 31, 2006, investment in real estate joint venture consisted of the
following:
Real estate investment $ 1,687,238
Joint venture earnings 42,947
------------
$ 1,730,185
NOTE H - ROYALTY INTERESTS
The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Amen Minerals, LP, currently
owns two separate royalty interests, one in the state of Texas and one in the
state of Oklahoma. The total consideration paid by the Company for the royalty
interests was $162,854. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, revenues and expenses are recognized on an accrual
basis. Royalty income is generally received one to two months following the
month of production and the Company uses estimates to accrue royalty income for
the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Depletion expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $6,840 and
$13,752, respectively, and accumulated depletion was $33,076 and $26,236,
respectively.
53
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE I - LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS
Securities available-for-sale in the accompanying balance sheet at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 totaled $62,350. The aggregate market value,
cost basis, and unrealized gains and losses of securities
available-for-sale, by major security type are as follows:
Gross
Market Cost Unrealized
Value Basis Losses
--------- ------ -----------
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
Other securities $ 62,350 62,350 -
========= ====== ===========
NOTE J - ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at December 31:
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Accrued TDSP charges $ 127,495 123,655
Accrued sales tax 89,143 -
Accrued corporate tithing 240,129 -
Accrued officer bonuses 100,885 -
Accrued property taxes - 185,988
Other liabilities 46,299 111,998
------------- -------------
$ 603,951 421,641
============= =============
NOTE K - INCOME TAXES
There was no income tax expense or benefit to report for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. A reconciliation of income taxes at
the statutory rate to the Company's effective rate is as follows for
the years ended December 31:
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Expected expense (benefit) computed at
the expected statutory rate $ 762,000 (229,000)
Less valuation allowance - 229,000
Utilization of net operating loss (762,000) -
------------- -------------
Income taxes $ - -
============= =============
54
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carry-forward $ 10,042,124 10,518,400
Investment basis 184,925 -
Start-up costs 29,329 39,994
Other 130,865 -
------------- -------------
Gross deferred tax assets 10,387,243 10,558,394
------------- -------------
Deferred tax liabilities
Property, plant and equipment (374,619) (123,281)
Other - (13,917)
------------- -------------
Gross deferred tax liabilities (374,619) (137,198)
------------- -------------
Valuation allowance (10,012,624) (10,421,196)
------------- ------------
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets $ - -
============= =============
As of December 31, 2006, the Company has net operating loss carry-forwards
totaling approximately $29,535,658 for federal and state income tax purposes
expiring in 2012 through 2026.
NOTE L - OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company's business activities are mainly comprised of three reportable
segments, real estate operations, a retail electricity provider ("REP"), and
retail electricity aggregation services.
The commercial real estate portfolio consists of the Company's investment in a
real estate joint venture (see notes C and G), consisting of an ownership of
approximately 18% in two office properties located in Midland, Texas comprising
an aggregate of approximately 428,560 square feet of gross leasable area.
The Company entered the retail electricity market in the state of Texas in July
2004. The retail electricity operations are primarily conducted through W Power
of which the Company is the sole general partner. The REP segment sells
electricity and provides the related billing, customer service, collection and
remittance services to both residential and commercial customers.
On April 1, 2006, the Company, through it's investment in Priority Power, began
aggregating electric consumers and negotiating power prices on their behalf with
retail electric providers. The aggregation of electric consumers is primarily
conducted through Priority Power of which Amen is the sole general partner.
Each segment's accounting policies are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies and the following tables reflect
totals for year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
55
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
December 31, 2006:
Energy Inter-Company
Real Estate Management Other and Transaction Consolidated
REP Operations Services Corporate Eliminations Total
---------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Revenues from external
customers $ 10,490,047 $ 2,418,702 $ 2,148,051 $ - $ - $ 15,056,800
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Revenues from other
operating segments $ 802,856 $ 31,196 $ 35,066 $ - $ (869,118) $ -
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Depreciation,
amortization and
depletion $ 14,936 $ 281,830 $ 1,765 $ 28,260 $ - $ 326,791
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Interest expense $ 15,037 $ 553,827 $ - $ 186,364 $ - $ 755,228
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Segment net income (loss) $ 527,890 $ 210,277 $ 933,186 $ 698,497 $ (208,692) $ 2,161,158
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Segment assets $ 3,950,610 $ 81,174 $ 1,310,965 $ 8,115,366 $ (359,429) $ 13,098,686
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Goodwill $ - $ - $ 2,916,085 $ - $ - $ 2,916,085
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Expenditures for segment
assets $ 10,306 $ 381,495 $ 14,496 $ 2,255 $ - $ 408,552
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
December 31, 2005:
Energy Inter-Company
Real Estate Management Other and Transaction Consolidated
REP Operations Services Corporate Eliminations Total
---------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------
Revenues from external
customers $ 7,172,223 $ 3,008,669 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,180,892
================ =============== =============== ============== ============== ===============
Revenues from other
operating segments $ 820,710 $ 23,275 $ - $ - $ (843,985) $ -
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Depreciation,
amortization and
depletion $ 9,717 $ 362,162 $ - $ 15,790 $ - $ 387,669
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Interest expense $ 86,601 $ 550,982 $ - $ - $ (85,016) $ 552,567
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Segment net income (loss) $ (350,799) $ 318,796 $ - $ (587,537) $ (85,022) $ (704,562)
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Segment assets $ 3,159,563 $ 7,480,267 $ - $ 5,500,160 $ (487,664) $ 15,652,326
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
Expenditures for segment
assets $ 32,662 $ 451,510 $ - $ 6,807 $ - $ 490,979
================ =============== =============== =============== ============== ===============
NOTE M - LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
On June 5, 2002, TCTB entered into a loan agreement (the "TCTB Note") with a
financial institution for a term note of $6,800,000. The term note bears
interest at a fixed rate per annum of 7.23%. TCTB was making monthly payments of
principal and interest in the amount of $53,663 for the term note until maturity
of the note on May 31, 2009. The loan agreement was secured by substantially all
of the assets of TCTB. As discussed in note C, on October 2, 2006, the TCTB Note
was paid in full.
56
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Delaware entered into nine promissory notes (the "Delaware Notes"), certain of
which are with related parties, in an aggregate amount of $2,789,087, to
purchase the 64.9% ownership interest in TCTB on October 1, 2002. The notes were
payable in annual payments of principal and interest beginning April 1, 2005
with a final maturity of May 31, 2009. Due to the distribution and sale of the
assets of TCTB (see note C) in late September 2006, the Company elected to forgo
the payment as described above and paid the remaining balance of the principal
balance along with the entire accrued interest balance during October 2006.
Delaware entered into a promissory note (the "Hexagon Note") on February 18,
2004, effective January 1, 2004 in the amount of $250,778 to purchase an
additional 6.485% ownership interest in TCTB. The note was payable in quarterly
installments of principal and interest beginning on March 1, 2004 with a final
maturity of January 1, 2010. Due to the distribution and sale of the assets of
TCTB (see note C) in late September 2006, the Company elected to pay the
remaining balance of the principal balance along with the accrued interest
balance during October 2006.
On February 28, 2005 the Company entered into a loan agreement (the "WNB Note")
with Western National Bank, Midland, Texas. The Note is a certain Revolving Line
of Credit in an amount of $5,000,000. Under the Note, the Bank may, but is not
obligated to advance more than $2,500,000. Borrowings under the Note are subject
to a borrowing base equal to the lesser amount of: (a) $5,000,000 or (b)
seventy-five percent (75%) of the eligible customer receivables of the Company
and its subsidiary W Power. The Note bears a variable interest rate equal to the
Prime Rate, defined as the prime rate in the money rate table of The Wall Street
Journal, a Dow Jones publication, as of each business day (8.25% at December 31,
2006). Interest is computed on the unpaid principal balance of the Note and is
due and payable as it accrues monthly, commencing March 31, 2005, and thereafter
on the last day of each and every succeeding month until maturity, March 31,
2008, when the entire amount of the Note, principal and accrued, unpaid
interest, shall be due and payable. The Note is secured by a security agreement
to all of the accounts receivable of W Power. In addition, the Note is
guaranteed by certain accredited investors which guarantees are partially
secured by letters of credit (see Note P). The loan agreement also contains
other customary conditions and events of default, the failure to comply with, or
occurrence of, would prevent any further borrowings and would generally require
the repayment of any outstanding borrowings along with accrued interest under
the loan agreement. The proceeds from the Note are intended to be used to fund
potential capital requirements in order to facilitate the growth of the
Company's retail electric provider subsidiary, W Power, and for general
corporate purposes.
On March 3, 2006 TCTB entered into a loan agreement with a financial institution
for a revolving line of credit note (the "Line of Credit") of $300,000. The line
of credit bears interest at a variable rate per annum equal to the Prime Rate,
currently 8.25% as of September 30, 2006. The proceeds from the Note are
intended to be used to fund potential tenant lease improvements provided for in
new tenant lease agreements at TCTB. The loan agreement is secured by
substantially all of the assets of TCTB. As of December 31, 2006, TCTB has not
utilized the line of credit.
NEMA entered into twenty-two promissory notes (the "NEMA Notes") on May 18,
2006, effective April 1, 2006 totaling $3,230,051 to purchase 100% ownership
interest in Priority Power Management, Ltd, a Texas limited partnership, and
Priority Power Management Dallas, Ltd, a Texas limited partnership (see note B).
The notes are due in quarterly installments of $142,985 beginning on September
30, 2006 with a final maturity of December 31, 2013. The term notes bear
interest at a fixed rate per annum of 7.75%.
57
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Long-term obligations consisted of the following at December 31, 2006
and 2005:
2006 2005
------------- -----------
NEMA Notes $ 3,149,649 $ -
TCTB Note - 5,905,034
Delaware Notes - 1,394,543
Hexagon Note - 175,342
WNB note - -
------------- -----------
3,149,649 7,474,919
Less related party portion (2,171,421) (879,738)
Less current portion (132,307) (259,009)
------------- -----------
$ 845,921 6,336,172
============== ===========
Related party portion of long-term obligations consisted of the
following at December 31, 2006 and 2005:
2006 2005
------------- -----------
NEMA Notes $ 2,171,421 -
TCTB Note - -
Delaware Notes - 879,738
Hexagon Note - -
-------------- ------------
2,171,421 879,738
Less current portion (293,687) -
-------------- ------------
$ 1,877,734 879,738
============== ============
Annual maturities of long-term obligations at December 31, 2006 are as
follows:
2007 $ 132,307
2008 115,376
2009 124,580
2010 134,520
2011 145,252
2012 and thereafter 326,193
------------
$ 978,228
Annual maturities of related party portion of long-term obligations at
December 31, 2006 are as follows:
2007 $ 293,687
2008 256,105
2009 276,538
2010 298,600
2011 322,423
2012 and thereafter 724,068
------------
$ 2,171,421
58
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
NOTE N - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, related parties leased office space of
approximately 32,000 square feet. The rental income received from these
related parties that is included in the real estate operations of the
Company was approximately $349,978 and $348,600 during the period then
ended, respectively.
The Company closed the sale and issuance of 125,000 shares of Series C
Preferred Stock and 250,000 Warrants (see note P) pursuant to a
Purchase Agreement, as amended by the Second Amendment on March 1, 2005
between the Company and certain accredited investors, including the
Company's President and Chief Operating Officer, Jon M. Morgan, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer, Eric Oliver and Bruce Edgington, one
of the Company's Directors.
The following table reflects the Series C issuance to the Company's
officers and directors.
Number of Preferred C
Preferred C Common Stock Voting Purchase
Shares Equivalent Equivalent Price
--------------- ----------------- ---------------- -------------
Eric Oliver 14,063 56,252 52,877 $ 225,008
Jon M. Morgan 14,062 56,248 52,873 224,992
Bruce Edgington 3,125 12,500 11,750 50,000
--------------- ----------------- ---------------- -------------
Total 31,250 125,000 117,500 $ 500,000
=============== ================= ================ =============
The following table reflects the issuance of Warrants to the Company's
Officers and Directors.
Number of Common Stock
Warrants Equivalent
--------------- -----------------
Eric Oliver 28,126 28,126
Jon M. Morgan 28,124 28,124
Bruce Edgington 6,250 6,250
--------------- -----------------
Total 62,500 62,500
=============== =================
On May 18, 2006, Jon M. Morgan and Bruce Edgington exercised their
outstanding warrants (described above) for a total exercise price of
$112,496 and $25,000, respectively. Mr. Morgan received 28,124 shares
of common stock and Mr. Edgington received 6,250 shares of common stock
upon the exercise of their stock warrants.
On May 25, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of all of the
outstanding partnership interests in Priority Power pursuant to a
Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and its
subsidiary, NEMA and the partners of Priority Power dated May 18,
2006. The total purchase price was $3,730,051, comprised of (i)
$500,000 in cash, and (ii) promissory notes with the aggregate
principal amount of $3,230,051 (see note M) from the Company and
NEMA and payable to the sellers. There are several business
relationships among Priority Power, its partners, the Company and
its subsidiaries, and their respective affiliates. The Company's
retail electricity provider subsidiary, W Power, has contractual
relationships with Priority Power with respect to providing
electricity to less than 0.2% of Priority Power's clients and the
Company believes W Power will not provide energy to any Priority
Power clients in the future. Additionally certain of the selling
partners of Priority Power are customers of W Power none of which
are considered significant customers. In addition, certain of the
selling partners of Priority Power are also five percent or more
stockholders of the Company or affiliates of stockholders of the
Company, including an affiliate of Jon M. Morgan, the President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric L. Oliver,
the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Jon M.
Morgan is a fifty percent owner of Anthem Oil and Gas, Inc which
was a selling limited partner of Priority Power. Mr. Morgan also
owned a one third interest in the selling general partner of
Priority Power Management, Ltd. Eric L. Oliver owned a
thirty-seven and a half percent interest in a selling limited
partner of Priority Power, Oakdale Ventures, Ltd.
59
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
The following table reflects the portion of the Company's long-term
debt payable to related parties as of December 31, 2006:
Total
-----------------
Eric Oliver, CEO $ 23,382
Jon M. Morgan , COO 553,091
5% Shareholders 1,301,261
-----------------
Total $ 1,877,734
=================
NOTE O - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits which arise primarily in
the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management that
the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will
not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position of the Company.
Power Purchase Contracts
Certain contracts to purchase electricity provide for capacity
payments to ensure availability and provide for adjustments based on
the actual power taken under the contracts. Expected annual future
capacity payments under existing agreements are estimated as follows
as of December 31, 2006:
60
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
2007 $ 1,225,563
2008 148,960
-------------
Total $ 1,374,523
=============
NOTE P - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
On February 3, 2005, the Company finalized an agreement involving a
private placement under Regulation D for the new Series C Preferred
Stock and common stock purchase warrants (the "Warrants") to accredited
investors (the "Purchase Agreement"). The Company closed the sale and
issuance of 125,000 Series C Preferred Stock and 250,000 Warrants
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, as amended by the Second Amendment
(the "Amended Purchase Agreement"), on March 1, 2005. The purchase
price consisted of a total of $2 million in cash and limited guaranties
from the investors in favor of Western National Bank covering the
credit facility described in Note M. No underwriting discounts or
commissions were paid in connection with this issuance. Certain facts
related to the exemption from registration of the issuance of the
securities under securities law are set forth in the Amended Purchase
Agreement as representations of the investors, including without
limitation their investment intent, their status as accredited
investors, the information provided to them, the restricted nature of
the securities, and similar matters.
The Series C ranks equally to the Company's outstanding Series A and
the outstanding Series B and prior to the Common Stock, par value $.01
per share, of the Company (the "Common Stock") upon liquidation of the
Company. The Series A, Series B, Series C and the Common Stock are
equal as to the payment of dividends. Each share of Series C is
convertible into four shares of Common Stock, for a total of 500,000
shares, subject to adjustment pursuant to anti-dilution provisions. The
Warrants are exercisable into a total of 250,000 shares of Common Stock
at an initial exercise price of $4.00 (also subject to adjustment
pursuant to anti-dilution provisions), and expire three years from the
date of issuance.
On July 29, 2005, the Company issued 4,859 shares of common stock for
$24,455 upon the exercise of certain stock options covering 341 and
4,518 shares with a strike price of $3.88 and $5.12, respectively.
On May 18, 2006, the Company issued 84,374 shares of common stock for
$337,495 upon the exercise of certain stock warrants (described above)
covering 84,374 shares with a strike price of $4.00.
NOTE Q - STOCK OPTION PLAN
Since the inception of the Company, various options have been granted
by the Board of Directors to founders, directors, employees,
consultants and ministry partners. In February 1997, the Company
authorized 67,100 additional shares of common stock to underlie
additional options reserved for key employees and for future
compensation to members of the Board of Directors. The Board of
Directors also adopted and the Stockholders approved, the 1997
Stock Option Plan ("1997 Plan"), which provides for the granting
of either qualified or non-qualified options to purchase an
aggregate of up to 514,484 shares of common stock, inclusive of
the 67,100 shares mentioned above, and any and all options or
warrants granted in prior years by the Company. As of December
31, 2006, all options available under the 1997 Plan have been
granted: 62,579 options have been exercised, and 178,110 options
are outstanding which are fully vested and range in price from
$3.50 to $61.36.
61
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
The 1998 Stock Option Plan ("1998 Plan") was approved by the Board of
Directors in April 1998, with approved amendment in May 2000. The 1998
Plan gives the Company the authority to issue 300,000 options to
purchase AMEN common stock. If any stock options granted under the 1998
Plan terminate, expire or are canceled, new stock options may
thereafter be granted covering such shares. In addition, any shares
purchased under the 1998 Plan subsequently repurchased by the Company,
if management elects, pursuant to the terms hereof may again be granted
under the 1998 Plan. The shares issued upon exercise of stock options
under the 1998 Plan may, in whole or in part, be either authorized but
unissued shares, or issued shares reacquired by the Company. As of
December 31, 2006, 4,859 options have been exercised and 113,381
options are outstanding and are fully vested and range in price from
$1.98 to $45.50.
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
For the year ended December 31, 2006 the Company did not issue any
stock options. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the following
assumptions were used: dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rates
based on the Treasury bond yield at the date of grant for three- to
five-year bonds, depending on the expected term; volatility range
approximating 50.9% to 51.1% depending on the grant date; and an
expected term of ten years.
The table below summarizes the stock option activity for the years
ending 2006 and 2005:
Weighted
Options Average
Options Outstanding Outstanding Price
--------------------------------- -------------- ---------------
Outstanding December 31, 2004 454,993 $ 13.05
Options exercised (4,859) 3.88
Options forfeited (54,481) 14.07
Options issued 37,950 5.97
--------------
Outstanding December 31, 2005 433,603 14.06
Options exercised - -
Options forfeited (142,112) 17.70
Options issued - -
--------------
Outstanding December 31, 2006 291,491 $ 12.29
==============
62
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
At December 31, 2006 the 291,491 outstanding options are fully vested
and exercisable. They range in price from $1.98 to $61.36 and have a
weighted average contractual maturity of 3.73 years. For the year ended
December 31, 2006 the Company did not issue any stock options. The
weighted average grant date fair value for equity options issued during
the year ending December 31, 2005 was $3.97 per share. Had compensation
expense been determined based on the fair value of the options at the
grant dates consistent with the method of accounting under SFAS No. 123
for the year ending December 31, 2005, the Company's net income and net
income per share for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 would
have been decreased to the proforma amounts indicated below:
2006 2005
------------- -------------
Net income (loss) from continuing operations,
as reported $ 2,161,158 (704,562)
Deduct: Total stock-based
employee compensation
expense determined
under fair value based
method - (150,842)
-------------- -------------
Net income (loss), pro forma $ 2,161,158 (855,404)
============= =============
As reported:
Net income (loss) - basic $ .94 (.32)
============= =============
Net income (loss) - diluted $ .56 (.32)
============= =============
Pro forma:
Net income (loss) - basic $ .94 (.39)
============= =============
Net income (loss) - diluted $ .56 (.39)
============= =============
NOTE R - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 27, 2007 the Company contributed its remaining 18.017% ownership in the
Bank of America Tower and the Century Plaza Tower to HPG Acquisition, LLC; a
Texas Limited Liability Company, along with $478,461 for a limited partnership
interest of approximately 18%.
63
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
2006
Quarter ended
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 Total
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------
Rental revenue
Rental revenue $ 751,605 832,969 834,128 - 2,418,702
Energy management fees - 676,806 809,217 662,028 2,148,051
Retail electricity revenue 3,168,707 3,391,948 1,956,012 1,973,380 10,490,047
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Total operating revenue 3,920,312 4,901,723 3,599,357 2,635,408 15,056,800
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Operating expense
Cost of goods and services 2,820,418 3,063,743 1,934,621 1,602,652 9,421,434
Rental property operations 478,386 542,797 631,300 - 1,652,483
General and administrative 236,692 497,041 539,056 776,367 2,049,156
Depreciation, amortization and depletion 102,276 105,059 112,022 7,434 326,791
Corporate tithing - - 209,266 30,863 240,129
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Total operating expense 3,637,772 4,208,640 3,426,265 2,417,316 13,689,993
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income from operations 282,540 693,083 173,092 218,092 1,366,807
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Other (expense) income
Interest income 49,701 59,115 61,023 58,157 227,996
Interest expense (140,662) (206,205) (343,344) (65,017) (755,228)
Gain on sale of interest in real estate - - 1,405,495 - 1,405,495
Income from real estate joint venture - - - 42,947 42,947
Other income (expense) 22,945 (112,997) (133) 23,574 (66,611)
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Total other income (expense) (68,016) (260,087) 1,123,041 59,661 854,599
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Income before income taxes and minority
interest 214,524 432,996 1,296,133 277,753 2,221,406
Income taxes - - - - -
Minority interest (21,870) (34,839) (3,547) 8 (60,248)
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
NET INCOME $ 192,654 398,157 1,292,586 277,761 2,161,158
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Net income per common share - (basic) $ .09 .18 .56 .11 .94
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Net income per common share - (diluted) $ .05 .11 .36 .07 .56
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic 2,206,215 2,246,084 2,290,589 2,290,589 2,290,589
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - diluted 3,555,979 3,595,848 3,640,353 3,830,078 3,830,078
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
64
AMEN Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Condensed consolidated statements of operations - Quarterly (Unaudited)
For the year ending December 31, 2005:
2005
Quarter ended
March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 Total
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------
Rental revenue
Rental revenue $ 670,182 672,137 894,749 771,601 3,008,669
Retail electricity revenue 310,789 1,125,596 2,545,563 3,190,275 7,172,223
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Total operating revenue 980,971 1,797,733 3,440,312 3,961,876 10,180,892
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Operating expense
Cost of goods and services 277,688 1,143,727 2,453,362 3,048,842 6,923,619
Rental property operations 407,622 452,447 554,428 527,123 1,941,620
General and administrative 206,986 223,579 329,312 169,776 929,653
Depreciation, amortization and depletion 91,835 104,671 106,284 84,879 387,669
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Total operating expense 984,131 1,924,424 3,443,386 3,830,620 10,182,561
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
(Loss) income from operations (3,160) (126,691) (3,074) 131,256 (1,669)
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Other (expense) income
Interest income 11,844 15,693 14,037 29,443 71,017
Interest expense (114,346) (148,149) (130,748) (159,324) (552,567)
Other income (expense) (17,164) 43,578 11,218 (167,634) (130,002)
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Total other income (expense) (119,666) (88,878) (105,493) (297,515) (611,552)
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
Loss before income taxes and minority
interest (122,826) (215,569) (108,567) (166,259) (613,221)
Income taxes - - - - -
Minority interest (40,824) 4,231 (41,899) (12,849) (91,341)
------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------
NET LOSS $ (163,650) (211,338) (150,466) (179,108) (704,562)
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Net loss per common share - (basic) $ (.07) (.10) (.07) (.08) (.32)
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Net loss per common share - (diluted) $ (.07) (.10) (.07) (.08) (.32)
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic 2,201,356 2,201,356 2,203,310 2,203,073 2,203,073
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - diluted 2,201,356 2,201,356 2,203,310 2,203,073 2,203,073
============= ============== ============= ============== =============
65
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
-------- --------------------
3.1+ Certificate of Incorporation and Certificates of Amendments
thereto of DIDAX INC.
3.1(a)+ Certificate of Correction regarding Certificate of Incorporation
3.1(b)** Certificate of Amendment thereto of DIDAX INC.
3.2+++ Certificate of Amendment thereto of Crosswalk.com, Inc.
3.3+ Bylaws and amendments thereto of the Company
3.4 ~ Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock
3.4(a) ~~ Amended Certificate of Designation for Series A Preferred Stock
3.5 ~~ Certification of Designation for Series B Preferred Stock
3.6*** Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated
May 26, 2004
3.7@ Certificate of Designation for Series C Preferred Stock
4.1@ Form of Warrant Certificate dated March 1, 2005
10.1// Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and Blue Hill Media,
Inc. dated December 13, 2002
10.2+ Form of Stock Option Agreement
10.3+ 1997 Stock Option Plan
10.4* 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended April 6, 1998
10.5* 1998 Stock Option Plan
10.6** 1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended February 26, 1999
10.7## 1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended March 3, 2000
10.8++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and A. Scott Dufford
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.9++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and John R. Norwood
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.10++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and J.M. Mineral and
Land Co. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September
29, 2000
10.11++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Jon M. Morgan
Pension Plan for Series A Preferred Stock dated
September 29, 2000
10.12++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Stallings
Properties, Ltd. for Series A Preferred Stock dated
September 29, 2000
66
10.13++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and John D. Bergman
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.14++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Julia Jones
Family Trust for Series A Preferred Stock dated September
29, 2000
10.15++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dodge Jones
Foundation for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.16++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Soft Op, L.P.
for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.17++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Lighthouse
Partners, L.P. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September
29, 2000
10.18++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Ray McGlothlin,
Jr. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.19++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Gary J. Lamb for
Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.20++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Frosty Gilliam,
Jr. for Series A Preferred Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.21++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Bruce Edgington
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.22++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Dodge Jones
Foundation for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.23++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Earl E. Gjelde
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.24++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Jon M. Morgan
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.25++ Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Soft Op, L.P.
for Series B Preferred Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.26++ Annex to the Stock Purchase Agreement for Series A Preferred
Stock dated September 29, 2000
10.27# Agreement to Suspend Dividends and Consent of the Holders of
Series A Preferred Stock of Amen Properties, Inc. dated May 30,
2003.
10.28# Agreement to Suspend Dividends and Consent of Holders of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Amen Properties, Inc. dated May
30, 2003.
10.29^ Consent, Waiver and Amendment of the holders of Series A
Preferred Stock dated January 2005 (identical copy executed by
each holder)
10.30^ Consent, Waiver and Amendment of the holders of Series B
Preferred Stock dated January 2005 (identical copy executed by
each holder)
10.31++ Annex to the Stock Purchase Agreement for Series B Preferred
Stock dated December 31, 2001
10.35// Lease Agreement between TCTB Partners, Ltd. and Bank of America,
N.A. dated September 30, 2003.
10.36// Lease Agreement between TCTB Partners, Ltd. and Pioneer Natural
Resources USA, Inc. dated April 4, 2000.
67
10.38### Employment and Noncompetition Agreement between the Company and
Kevin Yung dated as of July 1, 2004
10.41@ Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and certain
investors dated January 18, 2005, as amended by a First Amendment
dated January 28, 2005 and a Second Amendment dated February 28,
2005
10.42@ Loan Agreement between Amen Properties, Inc. and Western National
Bank
10.43@ Western National Bank Revolving Line of Credit Note
10.44 Employment Agreement between Priority Power Management, Ltd and
John Bick (Incorporated by reference to the Company's
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 1, 2006).
10.45 Employment Agreement between Priority Power Management, Ltd and
Padraig Ennis (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 1, 2006).
10.46 Securities Purchase Agreement among Amen Properties, Inc. and
NEMA Properties, LLC, Priority Power Management, Ltd. and
Priority Power Management Dallas, Ltd. and their respective
partners dated as of May 18, 2006, including the forms of
promissory note and assignment delivered at closing (incorporated
by reference to the Company's Form 8-K Current Report
filed on May 24, 2006).
10.47 Agreement to Distribute Assets among TCTB Partners, Ltd and its
partners dated as of September 27, 2006 (Incorporated
by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2006)
10.48 Purchase Agreement between TCTB Partners, Ltd as nominee for
certain partners of TCTB Partners, Ltd and Hampshire Plaza
Garage, LLC and S.E.S. Investments, Ltd. dated as of September
29, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 5, 2006)
10.48 Management Agreement between the Company and TCTB Management
Group, LLC. dated as of September 29, 2006 (Incorporated by
reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2006)
11 Statement of computation of earnings per share
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed
herewith)
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 USC
ss.1350.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC
ss.1350.
99.1 Press release regarding December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form
10-KSB
+ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24,
1997, SEC File No. 333-25937
++ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2002, amended July 25,
2002 and August 14, 2002.
68
+++ Filed as an Appendix to the Company's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2003.
* Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement Post
Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 2, 1998, SEC File No. 333-25937
** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000.
*** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 10, 2004.
# Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2003.
## Filed as an Appendix to the Company's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000.
### Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004
~ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1,
2000, SEC File No. 333-49126
~~ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2002, SEC file No.
333-85636
// Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2003.
@ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2005.
69