UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
  Washington, D.C. 20549
 
POST EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT NO. 2
to
FORM SB-2
on
FORM S-1
 
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter) 
 
Delaware
8742
20-0653570
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(Primary Standard Industrial
(IRS Employer
Incorporation or Organization)
Classification Code Number)
Identification No.)
 
Pharma-Bio Serv Building, Industrial Zone Lot 14, Barrio Higuillar, Dorado, Puerto Rico 00646
(Address and telephone number of Principal Executive Offices and principal place of business)
 
Ms. Elizabeth Plaza, Chief Executive Officer
Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc.
373 Mendez Vigo, Suite 110, Dorado, Puerto Rico 00646
Telephone: (787) 278-2709
Fax: (787) 796-5168
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
 
Please send a copy of all communications to:
 
Michael Francis, Esq.
Akerman Senterfitt
One Southeast Third Ave., 25 th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131-1714
Telephone: (305) 374-5600
Fax: (305) 374-5095
 
Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
 
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. x
 
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 

 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
 
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
 
 
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company x
 
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
 
Title of each class of
securities to be registered
 
Amount to be
registered
 
Proposed
maximum
offering price
per unit (1)
 
Proposed
maximum
aggregate offering
price (1)
 
Amount of
registration fee
 
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(2)
   
12,973,050
 
$
2.00
 
$
25,946,100
 
$
796.55
 
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share(3)
   
7,999,400
 
$
2.00
 
$
10,999,175
 
$
337.67
 
 
                   
$
1,134.22
 

*
Previously paid.
(1)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(a) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on the maximum proposed initial offering price of $2.00 for the 12,973,050 outstanding shares of common stock and the 7,999,400 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of common stock purchase warrants.
(2)
Represents 12,973,050 outstanding shares of common stock.
(3)
Represents 3,999,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $1.10 per share and 3,999,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $1.65 per share.
 
The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(a), may determine.
 

 
EXPLANATORY NOTE

THIS FILING DOES NOT INVOLVE THE REGISTRATION OF ANY NEW SHARES OF COMMON STOCK. RATHER, THIS FILING UPDATES THE REGISTRATION OF THE COMMON STOCK ORIGINALLY REGISTERED ON FORM SB-2 (FILE NO. 333-132847), DECLARED EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 8, 2006, AS AMENDED ON POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM SB-2, DECLARED EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2007.
 
iii

 
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
 
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED JUNE 26, 2008
 
PROSPECTUS
20,972,450 Shares
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Common Stock
OTC Bulletin Board Trading Symbol: PBSV
 
The selling stockholders may offer and sell from time to time up to an aggregate of 20,972,450 shares of our common stock that they own or that they may acquire from us upon exercise of warrants. For information concerning the selling stockholders and the manner in which they may offer and sell shares of our common stock, see “Selling Stockholders” and “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus.
 
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling stockholders of their shares of common stock other than the exercise price of the warrants if and when the warrants are exercised.
 
On June 25, 2008, the last reported sale price for our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board was $0.45 per share.
 
Investing in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase our common stock only if you can afford to lose your entire investment. See “Risk Factors,” which begins on page 4.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined whether this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
The selling stockholders have not engaged any underwriter in connection with the sale of their shares of common stock. The selling stockholders may sell their shares of common stock in the public market based on the market price at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may also sell their shares in transactions that are not in the public market in the manner set forth under “Plan of Distribution.”
 
The date of this Prospectus is June 26, 2008.
 

 
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you with information concerning us, except for the information contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the front cover page of this prospectus, regardless when the time of delivery of this prospectus or the sale of any common stock. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
Page
 
Prospectus Summary
   
1
 
The Offering
   
3
 
Summary of Financial Information
   
3
 
Risk Factors
   
4
 
Forward-Looking Statements
   
12
 
Use of Proceeds
   
12
 
Selling Stockholders
   
12
 
Plan of Distribution
   
15
 
Market for Common Stock and Stockholder Matters
   
17
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
   
18
 
Business
   
26
 
Management
   
30
 
Principal Stockholders
   
36
 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
   
38
 
Description of Capital Stock
   
39
 
Experts
   
41
 
Legal Matters
   
41
 
How to Get More Information
   
41
 
Financial Statements
   
F-1
 
 

 
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
 
This summary does not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read the entire prospectus, including the Risk Factors and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus before making an investment decision.
 
Our Business
 
We are a Puerto Rico based company established by Elizabeth Plaza as a sole proprietorship in 1993 and incorporated in 1997 to offer consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry. We have successfully grown our business operation by providing quality, value-added consulting services to the major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies principally in Puerto Rico and the United States of America.
 
Our mission is to become world leader in validation, regulatory compliance and technical support services, helping our clients meet the challenges of regulatory enforcement and globalization.
 
We assist our clients in complying with government regulations by offering a full range of consulting services in the areas relating to compliance with the regulations of the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and matters relating to the introduction of new pharmaceutical products, regulatory compliance, project management, technology transfers, validation, and training services. We provide value-added consulting services as outsourcing solutions to our customers in the pharmaceutical, chemical (bulk manufacturing), biotechnology and medical devices industries in Puerto Rico, United States of America and Europe.

In addition, in 2008 we launched in Puerto Rico our new microbiological testing facility incorporating the latest technology and test methodologies meeting pharmacopeia industry standards and regulations. We intend to offer microbiological testing and related services to our core industries already serviced as well as the cosmetic and food industries.

Our engineering and life science professionals include former quality assurance managers or directors from pharmaceutical companies, and experienced and well-trained professionals with bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees in health sciences and engineering. Our objective is to offer a flexible, common sense and cost effective approach to meet our clients’ resources needs, and meet their global strategies.
 
Organization; Reverse Acquisition
 
Pharm-Bio Serv, Inc. (“Pharma-Bio”) is a Delaware corporation, organized in 2004 under the name Lawrence Consulting Group, Inc. The corporate name was changed to Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. in February 2006. Our executive offices are located at Pharma-Bio Serv Building, Industrial Zone Lot 14, Barrio Higuillar, Dorado, Puerto Rico 00646, (787) 278-2709. Our website is www.pharmabioserv.com. Information on our website or any other website is not part of this prospectus.

On January 25, 2006, pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger among us, Plaza Acquisition Corp., Pharma-Bio Serv PR, Inc. (then known as Plaza Consulting Group, Inc. and referred to as “Pharma-PR”), and Elizabeth Plaza, the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR, Plaza Acquisition Corp. was merged into Pharma-PR, with the result that Pharma-PR became our wholly-owned subsidiary and our sole business became the business of Pharma-PR. The acquisition of Pharma-PR was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, with Pharma-PR being the accounting acquiring party. The accounting rules for reverse acquisitions require that beginning with the date of the merger, January 25, 2006, our balance sheet includes the assets and liabilities of Pharma-PR and our equity accounts were recapitalized to reflect the net equity of Pharma-Bio. In addition, our historical operating results will be the operating results of Pharma-PR. This transaction is referred to in this prospectus as the reverse acquisition.
 
References to “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words refer to Pharma-Bio, commencing with the acquisition of Pharma-PR and the consummation of the private placement which occurred contemporaneously with the acquisition.
 
1

 
Stock Distribution
 
On January 24, 2006, Pharma-Bio effected a share distribution with respect to our common stock pursuant to which we issued one additional share of common stock for each share of common stock outstanding on the record date, January 24, 2006. All share and per share information in this prospectus retroactively reflects such stock distribution.
 
Sale of Securities to the Selling Stockholders
 
On January 25, 2006, contemporaneously with the consummation of the acquisition of Pharma-PR, we sold, in a private placement, 47 units, each unit consisting of 25,000 shares of series A preferred stock, warrants to purchase 85,100 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share and warrants to purchase 85,100 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share. In the private placement, we issued an aggregate of 1,175,000 shares of series A preferred stock, warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share, and warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share, to 43 accredited investors. The warrants issued to the investors in the private placement are sometimes referred to as the “investor warrants”.
 
We paid brokerage commissions of 10% of the gross purchase price and an aggregate non-accountable expense allowance of 3% of the gross purchase price with respect to the units sold. In certain cases, the broker waived the commission and non-accountable expense allowance, and the investor paid the purchase price less the commission and non-accountable expense allowance. The purchase price for the 47 units sold was $11,750,000. Broker-dealers waived commission and non-accountable expense allowance with respect to $628,750, we paid commissions and non-accountable expense allowances totaling $898,750, and we issued to the brokers in the private placement warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,439,892 shares of common stock. These warrants, which constitute compensation to the brokers, have an exercise price of $.7344 per share and a term of three years.
 
The certificate of designation setting forth the rights of the holders of the series A preferred stock provides that at such time as our certificate of incorporation is amended to increase the authorized capital stock to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 50,000,000 shares of common stock, the series A preferred stock is automatically converted into common stock at the conversion ratio of 13.616 shares of common stock for each share of series A preferred stock. The warrants provide that they become exercisable upon the filing of such an amendment to our certificate of incorporation. On April 25, 2006, we amended and restated our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized capital stock to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 50,000,000 shares of common stock, at which time all of the outstanding shares of series A preferred stock were automatically converted into a total of 15,998,800 shares of common stock and the warrants became exercisable. The subscription agreement pursuant to which the series A preferred stock and warrants were issued required us to file a registration statement within 60 days after the effective date of the merger between Pharma-PR and Plaza Acquisition Corp., which was March 26, 2006. If we failed to file the registration statement by that date, we were required to issue .0003 shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued upon conversion of the series A preferred stock for each day we are late. Since we filed the registration statement three days late, we issued 14,401 shares of common stock to the former holders of the series A preferred stock.
 
The warrants issued in the private placement expire five years from the closing date and are callable by us if the closing price of the common stock is at least twice the exercise price of the warrants for twenty (20) consecutive trading days. 
 
2

 
THE OFFERING
 
Common Stock Offered:
The selling stockholders are offering a total of 20,972,450 shares of common stock, of which 12,973,050 shares are outstanding and 7,999,400 shares are issuable upon exercise of warrants
 
 
Outstanding Shares of Common Stock:
19,615,539 shares1,2
 
 
Common Stock to be Outstanding
After Exercise of Investor Warrants:
27,614,939 shares1
 
 
 
Use of Proceeds:
We will receive no proceeds from the sale of any shares by the selling stockholders. In the event that any selling stockholders exercise their warrants, we would receive the exercise price. If all warrants are exercised, we would receive approximately $11.0 million, all of which, if and when received, would be used for working capital and other corporate purposes.
 

(1)
As of June 20, 2008. Does not include a total of 8,056,392 shares of common stock, of which 2,500,000 shares are reserved for options, stock grants or other equity-based incentives under our 2005 long-term incentive plan, 5,539,892 shares are reserved for outstanding warrants other than the warrants held by the selling stockholders, and 16,500 shares are reserved for issuance as stock grants to employees.
(2)
As of June 20, 2008. Does not include the 7,999,400 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants held by the selling stockholders.
 
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
The following information as of October 31, 2007 and for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 has been derived from our audited financial statements, which appear elsewhere in this prospectus. The following information as of April 30, 2008 and for the six months ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 has been derived from our unaudited financial statements, which appear elsewhere in this prospectus.
 
Statement of Operations Information:
 
 
 
Consolidated
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
 
Six Months Ended April 30,
 
Year Ended October 31,
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
2007
 
2006
 
Revenues
 
$
7,302
 
$
7,755
 
$
16,205
 
$
14,184
 
Gross profit
 
$
2,720
 
$
3,160
 
$
6,824
 
$
6,068
 
Income before income taxes
 
$
1,143
 
$
1,489
 
$
3,337
 
$
3,495
 
Net income 1
 
$
628
 
$
847
 
$
1,901
 
$
2,335
 
Basic earnings per common share
 
$
0.03
 
$
0.04
 
$
0.10
 
$
0.22
 
Diluted earnings per common share
 
$
0.03
 
$
0.04
 
$
0.09
 
$
0.13
 
 

(1)
Prior to the reverse acquisition Pharma-PR was treated as an N Corporation under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, which is similar to an S Corporation under the United States Internal Revenue Code. As a result, Pharma-PR did not pay any income tax through January 25, 2006. Since January 25, 2006, Pharma-PR has been subject to income tax in Puerto Rico at statutory rates ranging from 39% to 41.5%. If Pharma-PR had not been treated as an N Corporation during a portion of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, net income for the year ended in October 31, 2006 would have been approximately $1,977,000, or $0.19 per share (basic) and $0.11 per share (diluted).
 
3

   
Consolidated Balance Sheet Information (in thousands):
 
 
 
April 30,
2008
 
October 31,
2007
 
Working capital
 
$
1,314
 
$
3,863
 
Total assets
   
7,415
   
9,563
 
Total liabilities
   
4,558
   
7,396
 
Retained earnings
   
2,674
   
2,046
 
Stockholders’ equity
   
2,857
   
2,167
 

RISK FACTORS
 
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In determining whether to purchase our securities, you should carefully consider all of the material risks described below, together with the other information contained in this prospectus before making a decision to purchase our securities. You should only purchase our securities if you can afford to suffer the loss of your entire investment.

Risks That Relate to our Business
 
Because our business is concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry in Puerto Rico, any changes in that industry could impair our ability to generate business.

Since most of our business is performed in Puerto Rico for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies, our ability to generate revenue and profit would be impaired by factors in Puerto Rico for example changes in taxes, regulatory, political or economic conditions which discourage these businesses from operating in Puerto Rico and changes in U.S. government regulations which affect the need for services such as those provided by Pharma-PR.

Since our business is dependent to the development and enhancement of patented pharmaceutical products or processes by our clients, the failure of our clients to obtain and maintain patents could impair our business.

Companies in the pharmaceutical industry are highly dependent on their ability to obtain and maintain patents for their products or processes. We are aware of some pharmaceutical companies with operations in Puerto Rico whose patents rights may expire in the near future. The inability to obtain new patents and the expiration of active patents may reduce the need for our services and thereby impair our ability to operate profitably.

Because our business is dependent upon a small number of clients, the loss of a major client could impair our ability to operate profitably.

Our business has been dependent upon a small number of clients. During the six months ended in April 30, 2008 and 2007, and the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006, a very small number of clients accounted for a disproportionately large percentage of our revenue. For the six-month periods ended in April 30, 2008 and 2007, four customers accounted for approximately 65% of our revenue, in both periods. For the year ended October 31, 2007, five customers accounted for approximately 66.7% of revenue. For the year ended October 31, 2006, four customers accounted for approximately 73.0% of revenue. The loss of, or significant reduction in, the scope of work performed for any major customer could impair our ability to operate profitably. We cannot assure we will not sustain significant decreases in revenue from our major customers or that we will be able to replace any decline in revenue.
 
4

 
We may be unable to pass on increased labor costs to our clients.

The principal components of our cost of revenues are employee compensation (salaries, wages, taxes and benefits) and expenses relating to the performance of the services. We face increasing labor costs which we seek to pass on to our customers through increases in our rates. To remain competitive, we may not be able to pass these cost increases to our clients, and, to the extent that we are not able to pass these increases to our clients, our gross margin will be reduced.

Our cash requirements include payments due from reverse merger transaction.

Pursuant to the merger agreement, we are still required to make a final payment of $2.75 million per our reverse merger agreement due on January 25, 2009. This payment is not contingent upon our earnings, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization or any other financial criteria. We may not have resources, other than from our operations, from which to make the payment and, even if we do have the available cash, our growth may be impaired if we use our cash for that purpose.

Because the pharmaceutical industry is subject to government regulations, changes in government regulations relating to this industry may affect the need for our services.

Because government regulations affect all aspects of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing industries, including regulations relating to the testing and manufacturing of pharmaceutical products and the disposal of materials which are or may be considered toxic, any change in government regulations could have a profound effect upon not only these companies but companies, such as ours, that provide services to these industries. If we are not able to adapt and provide necessary services to meet the requirements of these companies in response to changes in government regulations, our ability to generate business may be impaired.

The willingness of companies in the pharmaceutical and related industries to conduct business in Puerto Rico could significantly impair our business by reducing the need for our services.

Since our business is conducted mainly in Puerto Rico, our ability to generate revenues and income is dependent upon the willingness of our clients and potential clients to maintain or increase their operations in Puerto Rico. Our clients may consider factors such as tax benefits, Puerto Rico’s economy, cost of doing business and other economic factors.

Changes in tax benefits may affect the willingness of companies to continue or expand their operations in Puerto Rico.

Until 1996, the Internal Revenue Code provided certain tax benefits to pharmaceutical companies operating in Puerto Rico by enabling their Puerto Rico operations to operate free from federal income taxes. Partly as a result of the tax benefits, numerous pharmaceutical companies established facilities in Puerto Rico. In 1996, this tax benefit was eliminated, although companies that had facilities in Puerto Rico could continue to receive these benefits for ten years, at which time the benefits were set to expire. In order to promote business activities in Puerto Rico, the Puerto Rico government enacted in May 2008 a tax incentive law (“Act 73”). Among others, Act 73 provides tax exemption from various taxes, including income tax, and investment credits for activities similar to those of our customers and our Company. The change in the tax laws may affect favorably or unfavorably the willingness of pharmaceutical companies to continue or to expand their Puerto Rico operations. To the extent that pharmaceutical companies choose to develop and manufacture products outside of Puerto Rico, our ability to generate new business may be impaired.
 
Puerto Rico’s economy, including its 2006 governmental financial crisis, may affect the willingness of businesses to commence or expand operations in Puerto Rico.

As a result of Puerto Rico’s 2006 governmental financial crisis, which resulted in the temporary closing of government offices, businesses may be reluctant to commence or expand their operations in Puerto Rico. Further, since Puerto Rico’s economy is petroleum-based, the high price of oil, combined with Puerto Rico’s high level of debt, may make Puerto Rico a less attractive place to expand existing operations or commence new business activities. To the extent that companies in the pharmaceutical and related industries decide not to commence new operations or not to expand their existing operations in Puerto Rico, the market for our services may decline.
 
5

 
Other factors, including economic factors, may affect the decision of businesses to continue or expand their operations in Puerto Rico.

Companies in the pharmaceutical and related industries for which we perform service are subject to economic pressures which affect their global operations and which may influence the decision to reduce or increase the scope of their operations in Puerto Rico. These companies consider a wide range of factors in making such a decision, and may be influences by a need to consolidate operations, to reduce expenses, to increase their business in geographical regions where there are large customer bases, to tax, regulatory and political considerations and many other factors. We can not assure you that our customers and potential customers will not make extensive reductions or terminate their operations in Puerto Rico entirely, which could significantly impair our ability to generate revenue.

If we are unable to protect our clients’ intellectual property, our ability to generate business will be impaired.

Our services either require us to develop intellectual property for clients or provide our personnel with access to our clients’ intellectual property. Because of the highly competitive nature of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing industries and the sensitivity of our clients’ intellectual property rights, our ability to generate business would be impaired if we fail to protect those rights. Although all of our employees and contractors are required to sign non-disclosure agreements, any disclosure of a client’s intellectual property by an employee or contractor may subject us to litigation and may impair our ability to generate business either from the affected client or other potential clients. In addition, we are required to enter into confidentiality agreements and our failure to protect the confidential information of our clients may impair our business relationship.

We may be subject to liability if our services or solutions for our clients infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others.

It is possible that in performing services for our clients, we may inadvertently infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. In such event, the owner of the intellectual property may commence litigation seeking damages and an injunction against both us and our client, and the client may bring a claim against us. Any infringement litigation would be costly, regardless of whether we ultimately prevail. Even if we prevail, we will incur significant expenses and our reputation would be hurt, which would affect our ability to generate business and the terms on which we would be engaged, if at all.
 
We may be held liable for the actions of our employees or contractors when on assignment.

We may be exposed to liability for actions taken by our employees or contractors while on assignment, such as damages caused by their errors, misuse of client proprietary information or theft of client property. Due to the nature of our assignments, we cannot assure you that we will not be exposed to liability as a result of our employees or contractors being on assignment.

To the extent that we perform services pursuant to fixed-price or incentive-based contracts, our cost of services may exceed our revenue on the contract.

Some of our revenue is derived from fixed price contracts. Our costs of services may exceed revenue of these contracts if we do not accurately estimate the time and complexity of an engagement. Further, we are seeking contracts by which our compensation is based on specified performance objectives, such as the realization of cost savings, quality improvements or other performance objectives. Our failure to achieve these objectives would reduce our revenue and could impair our ability to operate profitably.
 
6

 
Our profit margin is largely a function of the rates we are able to charge and collect for our services and the utilization rate of our professionals. Accordingly, if we are not able to maintain our pricing for our services or an appropriate utilization rate for our professionals without corresponding cost reductions, our profit margin and profitability will suffer. The rates we are able to charge for our services are affected by a number of factors, including:

 
·
Our clients’ perception of our ability to add value through our services;

 
·
Our ability to complete projects on time;

 
·
Pricing policies of competitors;

 
·
Our ability to accurately estimate, attain and sustain engagement revenues, margins and cash flows over increasingly longer contract periods; and

 
·
General economic and political conditions.

Our utilization rates are also affected by a number of factors, including:

 
·
Seasonal trends, primarily as a result of our hiring cycle;

 
·
Our ability to move employees and contractors from completed projects to new engagements; and

 
·
Our ability to manage attrition of our employees and contractors.

Because most of our contracts may be terminated on little or no advance notice, our failure to generate new business could impair our ability to operate profitably.

Subject to cancellation fees, most of our contracts can be terminated by our clients with short notice. Our clients typically retain us on a non-exclusive, engagement-by-engagement basis, and the client may terminate, cancel or delay any engagement or the project for which we are engaged, at any time and on short notice. As a result, we need to develop new business on an ongoing basis. Since our operations are heavily concentrated on companies operating in Puerto Rico and, to a lesser extent, Puerto Rico businesses that operate elsewhere, the termination, cancellation, expiration or delay of contracts could have a significant impact on our ability to operate profitably.
 
Because of the competitive nature of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing consulting market, we may not be able to compete effectively if we cannot efficiently respond to changes in the structure of the market and developments in technology.

Because of recent consolidations in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing consulting business, we are faced with an increasing number of larger companies that offer a wider range of services and have better access to capital than we have. We believe that larger and better-capitalized competitors have enhanced abilities to compete for both clients and skilled professionals. In addition, one or more of our competitors may develop and implement methodologies that result in superior productivity and price reductions without adversely affecting their profit margins. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete effectively in an increasingly competitive market.
 
7

 
Because we are dependent upon our management, our ability to develop our business may be impaired if we are not able to engage skilled personnel.

Our success to date has depended in large part on the skills and efforts of Elizabeth Plaza, our president, chief executive officer and founder. The loss of the services of Ms. Plaza could have a material adverse effect on the development and success of our business. We entered into a new employment agreement with Ms. Plaza, to continue under her current position and responsibilities through January 1, 2010, and as a consultant thereafter.  Although we have a contract with Ms. Plaza, this agreement does not guarantee that she will continue to be employed by us. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to attract and retain additional qualified management and technical personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and we compete for qualified personnel with numerous other employers, including consulting firms, some of which have greater resources than we have, as well as pharmaceutical companies, most of which have significantly greater financial and other resources than we do. We may experience increased costs in order to retain and attract skilled employees. Our failure to attract additional personnel or to retain the services of key personnel and independent contractors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate profitably.

We may not be able to continue to grow unless we consummate acquisitions or enter markets outside of Puerto Rico.

An important part of our growth strategy is (i) to acquire other businesses which can increase the range of services and products that we can offer and (ii) to establish offices in locales where we do not presently operate, either by acquisition or by internal growth. If we fail to make any acquisitions or otherwise expand our business, our future growth may be limited. We have recently entered into the Irish market through a newly formed 80%-owned subsidiary. The success of the operation is dependent, among others, on such factors as regulatory, tax, political or economic conditions, our abilities to penetrate the market, hire qualified personnel in a timely manner, obtain and maintain reasonable labor costs, generate service revenue volume and profitable margins.

If we identify a proposed acquisition, we may require substantial cash to fund the cost of the acquisition.

Any acquisitions we make may be made with cash or our securities or a combination of cash and securities. To the extent that we require cash, we may have to borrow the funds or sell equity securities. We have no commitments from any financing source and we may not be able to raise any cash necessary to complete an acquisition. If we seek to expand our business internally, we will incur significant start-up expenses without any assurance of our ability to penetrate the market.

The issuance of securities, whether in connection with an acquisition or otherwise, may result in significant dilution to our stockholders.

If we are required to issue securities either as payment of all or a portion of the purchase price of an acquisition or in order to obtain financing for the acquisition or for other corporate purposes could result in dilution to our stockholders. The amount of such dilution will be dependent upon the terms on which we issue securities. The issuance of securities at a price which is less than the exercise price of warrants or the conversion price of securities could result in additional dilution if we are required to reduce the exercise price or conversion price of the then outstanding options or warrants or other convertible securities.
 
8

 
If we make any acquisitions, they may disrupt or have a negative impact on our business.

If we make acquisitions or establish operations in locales outside of Puerto Rico, we could have difficulty integrating the acquired companies’ personnel and operations with our own. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired business may not be willing to work for us. We cannot predict the effect an expansion may have on our core business. Regardless of whether we are successful in making an acquisition, the negotiations could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses. In addition to the risks described above, acquisitions are accompanied by a number of inherent risks, including, without limitation, the following:

 
·
the difficulty of integrating acquired products, services or operations;

 
·
the potential disruption of the ongoing businesses and distraction of our management and the management of acquired companies;

 
·
the potential loss of contracts from clients of acquired companies.

 
·
the difficulty of maintaining profitability due to increased labor and expenses from acquired company.

 
·
difficulties in complying with regulations in other countries that relate to both the pharmaceutical or other industries to which we provide services as well as our own operations;
 
 
·
difficulties in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;

 
·
the potential impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of any integration of new management personnel;

 
·
the potential inability or failure to achieve additional sales and enhance our customer base through cross-marketing of the products to new and existing customers;

 
·
the effect of any government regulations which relate to the business acquired;

 
·
potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired businesses or product lines, or the need to spend significant amounts to retool, reposition or modify the marketing and sales of acquired products or the defense of any litigation, whether of not successful, resulting from actions of the acquired company prior to our acquisition;

 
·
difficulties in disposing of the excess or idle facilities of an acquired company or business and expenses in maintaining such facilities; and

 
·
potential expenses under the labor, environmental and other laws of other countries.

Our business could be severely impaired if and to the extent that we are unable to succeed in addressing any of these risks or other problems encountered in connection with an acquisition, many of which cannot be presently identified. Further, the commencement of business in other countries may be subject to significant risks in areas which we are not able to prepare for in advance.
 
9

 
Our quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability will vary from quarter to quarter, which may result in increased volatility of our stock price.

Our quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the past and are likely to vary significantly from quarter to quarter, making them difficult to predict. This may lead to volatility in our share price. The factors that are likely to cause these variations are:

 
·
Seasonality, including number of workdays and holiday and summer vacations;

 
·
The business decisions of clients regarding the use of our services;

 
·
Periodic differences between clients’ estimated and actual levels of business activity associated with ongoing engagements, including the delay, reduction in scope and cancellation of projects;

 
·
The stage of completion of existing projects and/or their termination;

 
·
Our ability to move employees quickly from completed projects to new engagements and our ability to replace completed contracts with new contracts with the same clients or other clients;

 
·
The introduction of new services by us or our competitors;
 
 
·
Changes in pricing policies by us or our competitors;

 
·
Our ability to manage costs, including personnel compensation, support-services and severance costs;

 
·
Acquisition and integration costs related to possible acquisitions of other businesses;

 
·
Changes in estimates, accruals and payments of variable compensation to our employees or contractors; and

 
·
Global economic and political conditions and related risks, including acts of terrorism.

Because of our cash requirements, we may be unable to pay dividends.

Except for payments to Elizabeth Plaza during the period when she was our sole stockholder, including $8.0 million paid in the year ended October 31, 2007, we have not paid any dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future under the merger agreement. We intend to retain any earnings to finance the growth of our business and to pay the deferred payment of $2.75 million owed to Elizabeth Plaza and we may never pay cash dividends.

Risks Concerning our Securities

Because there is a limited market in our common stock, stockholders may have difficulty in selling our common stock and our common stock may be subject to significant price swings.

There is a very limited market for our common stock. Since trading commenced in December 2006, there has been little activity in our common stock and on some days there is no trading in our common stock. Because of the limited market for our common stock, the purchase or sale of a relatively small number of shares may have an exaggerated effect on the market price for our common stock. We cannot assure stockholders that they will be able to sell common stock or, that if they are able to sell their shares, that they will be able to sell the shares in any significant quantity at the quoted price.
 
10

 
The exercise of outstanding options and warrants may have a dilutive effect on the price of our common stock.

To the extent that outstanding stock options and warrants are exercised, dilution to our stockholders will occur. Moreover, the terms upon which we will be able to obtain additional equity capital may be adversely affected, since the holders of the outstanding options and warrants can be expected to exercise them at a time when we would, in all likelihood, be able to obtain any needed capital on terms more favorable to us than the exercise terms provided by the outstanding options and warrants.

Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the Commission and others, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets. Because we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with such compliance any sooner than necessary, we have not yet adopted all of these measures. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations. Furthermore, commencing with our current fiscal year, which ends October 31, 2008, we will be required to have a more formal and documented internal control structure in place. We may incur significant expenses during the year to enable us to take steps that are necessary in order to establish such requirements.
 
11

 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations. In light of the important factors that can materially affect results, including those set forth in this paragraph and below, the inclusion of forward-looking information herein should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved. The Company may be unable to expand its customer base and to replace customers upon the completion of contracts, and may encounter competitive, technological, financial and business challenges making it more difficult than expected to continue to develop and market its services; the market may not accept the Company's existing and future services; changes relating to the business of our clients; tax, economic, industry trends and other factors relating to Puerto Rico; our ability to retain existing key management personnel; our ability to make acquisitions and other material adverse changes affecting our operations or business. Assumptions relating to budgeting, marketing, and other management decisions are subjective in many respects and thus susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause us to alter our marketing and other budgets, which may in turn affect our financial position and results of operations. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak solely as of the date of this prospectus, and the forward looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the material contained in "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contained in this prospectus. We assume no responsibility to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

USE OF PROCEEDS
 
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling stockholders of their common stock. If the selling stockholders exercise any warrants, we will receive the amount of the exercise price. The maximum total exercise price is approximately $11 million, which we would receive only if all of the warrants were exercised at their present exercise price. Any proceeds which we receive from the exercise of the warrants will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.
 
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
 
Except indicated, the following table sets forth the names of the selling stockholders, the number of shares of common stock owned beneficially by the selling stockholders as of June 20, 2008, the number of shares of our common stock that may be offered by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus, and the number of shares owned by the selling stockholders after completion of the offering. Except for San Juan Holdings, Inc. and LDP Family Partnership, no selling stockholder will own more than 1% of our outstanding common stock after the sale of shares owned by such selling stockholder. After completion of the sale of the shares owned by San Juan Holdings and offered by this prospectus, San Juan Holdings would beneficially own 3,811,324 shares of common stock, representing 19.4% of our outstanding common stock, assuming no warrants are exercised by the selling stockholders, and 13.8% of the common stock, assuming all of the warrants held by the selling stockholders are exercised. After completion of the sale of shares owned by LDP Family Partnership and offered by this prospectus, LDP Family Partnership will beneficially own 1,164,554 shares, representing 5.94% of our outstanding common stock, assuming no warrants are exercised by the selling stockholders and 4.22% of our common stock, assuming all of the warrants held by the selling stockholders are exercised. The table and the other information contained under the captions “Selling Stockholders” and “Plan of Distribution” has been prepared based upon information furnished to us by or on behalf of the selling stockholders. The number of shares included in this “Selling Stockholders” table does not match the number of shares registered in this Post-Effective Amendment because as of the date of this Prospectus we have not received confirmation of beneficial ownership from each of the selling stockholders.
 
12


Name
 
Shares 
Beneficially
Owned
 
Shares
Being  Sold
 
Shares owned
after offering
 
Venturetek LP (1)
   
4,697,990
   
4,697,990
   
 
Barron Partners LP(2)
   
3,899,174
   
3,899,174
   
 
Fame Associates(3)
   
1,532,719
   
1,532,719
   
 
Pentland U.S.A. Inc.(4)
   
1,532,619
   
1,532,619
   
 
   
4,811,443
   
1,000,119
   
3,811,324
 
LDP Family Partnership LP (6)
   
2,323,393
   
1,158,839
   
1,164,554
 
Ruki Renov (7)
   
884,873
   
880,873
   
4,000
 
Lakeside Partners LLC (8)*
   
564,248
   
564,248
   
 
Esther Stahler (9)*
   
577,591
   
571,591
   
6,000
 
Academia Nuestra Senora de la Providencia (10)
   
510,906
   
510,906
   
 
Fernando Lopez
   
510,906
   
510,906
   
 
Harry Edelson*
   
510,906
   
510,906
   
 
Juan H. Vidal
   
340,706
   
340,706
   
 
KEMA Advisors, Inc. (11)
   
510,906
   
340,706
   
170,200
 
Manuel Matienzo
   
510,906
   
510,906
   
 
Melvyn I. Weiss*
   
510,906
   
510,906
   
 
SDS Capital Group SPC, Ltd.*
   
428,606
   
428,606
   
 
Wilfredo Ortiz
   
510,906
   
510,906
   
 
Brinkley Capital Limited (12)*
   
357,634
   
357,634
   
 
Albert Milstein*
   
255,453
   
255,453
   
 
David Jordon*
   
229,908
   
229,908
   
 
Heller Capital Investments, LLC (13)*
   
68,080
   
68,080
   
 
Jay Fialkoff
   
188,080
   
187,880
   
200
 
Stephen Wien*
   
189,363
   
189,363
   
 
Arthur Falcone*
   
153,272
   
153,272
   
 
Edward Falcone*
   
153,272
   
153,272
   
 
Silverman & Roberts 44 Pipe LLC (14) *
   
153,272
   
153,272
   
 
Nahum Gabriel Shar*
   
127,727
   
127,727
   
 
Richard Molinsky*
   
102,181
   
102,181
   
 
Alan and Hanna Bresler, JT TEN WROS*
   
47,591
   
47,591
   
 
Ben Greszes*
   
51,091
   
51,091
   
 
Hendeles Grandchildren Trust #2 dated 12/23/93 (15)*
   
17,020
   
17,020
   
 
Hendeles Grandchildren Trust dated 1/1/89 (15)*
   
34,091
   
34,091
   
 
Hendeles Living Trust(15)*
   
51,091
   
51,091
   
 
Herschel Kulefsky*
   
51,091
   
51,091
   
 
Jay J. Kestenbaum*
   
36,091
   
36,091
   
 
Nathan Eisen*
   
41,091
   
41,091
   
 
Ari Renov
   
48,327
   
46,327
   
2,000
 
Eli Renov
   
48,327
   
46,327
   
2,000
 
Jill Renov
   
47,327
   
46,327
   
1,000
 
Kenneth Renov
   
48,327
   
46,327
   
2,000
 
Tani Renov (16)
   
50,327
   
46,327
   
4,000
 
Tova Katz (17)
   
46,327
   
39,327
   
7,000
 
 
* Information is as of July 31, 2007.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)
Mr. David Selengut, the manager of TaurusMax LLC, which is the general partner of Venturetek, LP. has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Venturetek. The shares beneficially owned by Venturetek do not include 200 shares of common stock held by Mr. Selengut and 200 shares held by Mr. Selengut’s wife. Mr. Selengut disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by his wife.
 
(2)
Mr. Andrew B. Worden, president of the general partner of Barron Partners, has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Barron Partners.
 
13


(3)
Abraham H. Fruchthandler and FBE Limited, are the sole general partners of Fame Associates, and Mr. Fruchthandler is the sole general partner of FBE Limited. Accordingly, Mr. Fruchthandler has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Fame Associates.
 
(4)
Pentland U.S.A., Inc. is owned by Pentland Brands, which is controlled by Stephen Rubin, who has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Pentland U.S.A.
 
(5)
Messrs. Ramon Dominguez and Addison M. Levi III have voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by San Juan Holdings, Inc.
 
(6)
Laya Perlysky, as general partner, has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by LDP Family Partnership LP. The number of shares beneficially owned by LDP Family Partnership (a) includes 1,164,554 shares owned by Krovim LLC, of which Dov Perlysky, the husband of Laya Perlysky, is the managing member of the manager. Ms. Perlysky and LDP Family Partnership disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares and warrants held by Krovim LLC.
 
(7)
Includes a total of 2,000 shares held by Ms. Renov as custodian for her two minor children. Ms. Renov disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
(8)
Jamie Stahler, as the managing member, has the voting and dispositive power of over shares beneficially owned by of Lakeside Partners, LLC. The shares beneficially owned by Lakeside Partners do not include 2,000 shares held by Mr. Stahler.
 
(9)
Includes a total of 4,000 shares held by Ms. Stahler as custodian for her four minor children. Ms. Stahler disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
(10)
Baudilio Merino, as president, has the voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Academia Nuestra Senora de la Providencia.
 
(11)
Kirk Michel, as managing director, has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by KEMA Advisors, Inc.
 
(12)
Comercio e Industria Multiformas Ltda., whose majority shareholder is Emanuel Wolff, has the voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Brinkley Capital Limited.
 
(13)
Ron Heller, as the controlling partner, has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Heller Capital Investments, LLC.
 
(14)
Marc Roberts, as the controlling party, has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Silverman & Roberts 44 Pipe LLC.
 
(15)
Moise Hendeles, as trustee, has voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Hendeles Grandchildren Trust #2 dated 12/23/93, Hendeles Grandchildren Trust dated 1/1/89 and Hendeles Living Trust.
 
(16)
Includes 2,000 shares held by Mr. Renov’s wife. Mr. Renov disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
(17)
Includes a total of 3,000 shares held by Ms. Katz as custodian for her three minor children and 2,000 shares held by her husband. Ms. Katz disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
14

 
None of the selling stockholders has, or within the past three years has had, any position, office or material relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates except as follows:

In consideration for investment banking services rendered by San Juan Holdings, as advisor to Plaza and Elizabeth Plaza, we issued to San Juan Holdings 600,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The services rendered by San Juan Holdings included advice to Pharma-PR and to Ms. Plaza, and negotiation with us on behalf of Pharma-PR and Ms. Plaza, as to the structure of the transaction and the consideration payable to Ms. Plaza for her stock in Pharma-PR, including the amount paid at closing, the equity to be issued to Ms. Plaza and the amount, timing and conditions of the deferred payment. In connection with the January 2006 private placement in which we issued the shares of series A preferred stock to the selling stockholders, we paid RD Capital Group, an affiliate of San Juan Holdings, $195,000 for commissions and non-accountable expense allowance and we issued to RD Capital Group warrants to purchase 275,724 shares of common stock. RD Capital Group waived its commission and non-accountable expense allowance on the securities purchased by San Juan Holdings, and, as a result, the purchase price of the securities purchased by San Juan Holdings was $652,500 rather than $750,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.7344 per share and a term of three years, and the holders of the warrants have piggyback registration rights commencing six months after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
 
Dov Perlysky is a director and, prior to the acquisition of Pharma-PR, Mr. Perlysky was the sole director and our sole executive officer.
 
Kirk Michel is a director. Mr. Michel was elected as a director at the time of the closing of the acquisition of Pharma-PR.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
 
The selling stockholders and any of their pledgees, donees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions or by gift. These sales may be made at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may sell their shares of common stock in the public market based on the market price at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. Subject to the foregoing, the selling stockholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling or otherwise transferring shares:
 
 
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
 
 
block trades in which a broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
 
 
sales to a broker-dealer as principal and the resale by the broker-dealer of the shares for its account;
 
 
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
 
 
privately negotiated transactions, including gifts;
 
 
covering short sales made after the date of this prospectus;
 
 
pursuant to an arrangement or agreement with a broker-dealer to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
 
 
a combination of any such methods of sale; and
 
 
any other method of sale permitted pursuant to applicable law.
 
The selling stockholders may also sell shares pursuant to Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act, if available, rather than pursuant to this prospectus.

15

 
Broker-dealers engaged by the selling stockholders may arrange for other brokers dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. The selling stockholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.
 
A selling stockholder may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares or common stock or warrant owned by them and, if the selling stockholder defaults in the performance of the secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus, or under an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.
 
In connection with the sale of our common stock or interests therein, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions which may in turn engage in short sales of our common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The selling stockholders may, after the date of this prospectus, also sell shares of our common stock short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge their common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The selling stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or the creation of one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).
 
The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.
 
In the event of a transfer by a selling stockholder of the warrants or the common stock other than a transfer pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 of the SEC, we may be required to amend or supplement this prospectus in order to name the transferee as a selling stockholder.
 
The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. The selling stockholders have informed us that they do not have any agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the common stock.
 
Because the selling stockholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act. Federal securities laws, including Regulation M, may restrict the timing of purchases and sales of our common stock by the selling stockholders and any other persons who are involved in the distribution of the shares of common stock pursuant to this prospectus. To our knowledge, none of the selling stockholders have an agreement or understanding with any broker-dealer with respect to the sale of their shares except as set forth below.
 
One of the selling stockholders, San Juan Holdings, is an affiliate of RD Capital Group, a broker-dealer, and may sell shares through RD Capital Group. Two other stockholders are employees, but not affiliates of broker-dealers. David Jordan is an employee of Axiom Capital, and Wilfredo Ortiz is an employee of RD Capital Group. Although they do not have a ownership or control relationship with, and are not officers, directors or partners of, the broker-dealers, they may, nonetheless, be deemed affiliates of the broker-dealers. Selling stockholders who are broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers will be deemed underwriters in connection with their sales. The selling stockholders who are affiliates and employees of broker-dealers purchased their shares in the ordinary course and, at the time of purchasing the securities they had no agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities.
 
We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
 
16

 
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol PBSV since December 4, 2006. The table below presents the closing high and low closing bid prices for our common stock for each quarter from December 2006 through April 30, 2008. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
 
Quarter Ending
 
High Bid
 
Low Bid
 
January 31, 2007 (commencing December 4, 2006)
 
$
1.68
 
$
0.49
 
April 30, 2007
   
1.05
   
0.52
 
July 31, 2007
   
0.67
   
0.43
 
October 31, 2007
   
1.15
   
0.56
 
January 31, 2008
   
0.99
   
0.51
 
April 30, 2008
   
0.72
   
0.42
 

On June 25, 2008, the closing price of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board was $0.45 per share.

Prior to the reverse acquisition, we were taxed as an N Corporation under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, which is similar to that of an S Corporation under the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, all of our income was taxed to our then sole stockholder, Elizabeth Plaza. Other than the distributions to Ms. Plaza which were made during the period that we were an N Corporation, we did not pay dividends on our common stock. We plan to retain future earnings, if any, for use in our business. We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which our securities may be issued as of April 30, 2008.

Plan Category
 
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options
and warrants
 
Weighted-average exercise
price per share of
     outstanding options and     
warrants
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
   
1,506,772
 
$
0.7333
   
993,228
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
   
3,939,892
 
$
0.3065
   
16,500
 
 
The securities issuable pursuant to the equity plan that was approved by stockholders is the 2005 long-term incentive plan, which was approved by stockholders in April 2006, as amended, and approved by stockholders in April 2007.

The equity compensation plans not approved by security holders are (i) warrants to purchase 1,439,892 which were issued to brokers in connection with the January 2006 private placement, (ii) warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock issued to San Juan Holdings for services relating to the acquisition of Plaza, and (iii) approximately 16,500 shares of common stock issuable to employees.

17


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements. For a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ from results discussed in the forward-looking statements, see “Forward Looking Statements.”

We are a validation and compliance consulting service firm with a base in Puerto Rico, servicing the Puerto Rico and, to a lesser extent, the United States and other markets. The validation and compliance consulting service market in Puerto Rico and the United States consists of local validation and compliance consulting firms, United States dedicated validation and compliance consulting firms and large publicly traded and private domestic and foreign engineering and consulting firms. We provide a broad range of compliance and validation consulting services. We market our services to pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology and medical devices and allied products companies in Puerto Rico, the United States and Europe through their Puerto Rico operations. Our staff includes more than 145 experienced engineering and life science professionals, and includes former quality assurance managers or directors, and experienced and well-trained professionals with bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees in health sciences and engineering.

Our revenue is derived from time and materials contracts (representing approximately 90% of total revenues), where the clients are charged for the time, materials and expenses incurred on a particular project, and to a lesser extent (approximately 10% of total revenues) from fixed-fee contracts or from “not to exceed” contracts, which are generally short-term contracts, in which the value of the contract to us cannot exceed a stated amount. For time and materials contracts, our revenue is principally a function of the number of its compliance and validation professional employees and the number of hours billed per professional. To the extent that our revenue is based on fixed-fee or “not to exceed” contracts, our ability to operate profitably is dependent upon our ability to estimate accurately the costs that we will incur on a project and to the management and monitoring of the project progress. If we underestimate our costs on any contract, we would sustain a loss on the contract.

Although our business is affected by seasonal factors such as vacation and holiday work policies, we do not believe that our business is seasonal. However, because our business is based on performing services under contracts which relate to specific projects, there may be a lag between the completion of one project and the commencement of the following project. This lag may cause some decline in revenues and a related decline in gross margin.

The principal components of our costs of revenue are employee compensation (salaries, wages, taxes and benefits) and expenses relating to the performance of the services. We face increasing labor costs which we seek to pass on to our customers through increases in our rates. However, there is often a delay between the increase in our costs and the increases in our billing rate, which may result in a reduced gross margin during that period. Although we have been successful in the past in being able to increase our billing rates to reflect our increased labor costs, we cannot give any assurance that we will continue to be able to do so.

We believe the most significant factors to achieving future business growth are our ability to (a) continue to provide quality value-added validation and compliance services to our clients; (b) recruit and retain highly educated and experienced validation and compliance professionals; (c) further expand our products and services to address the expanding compliance needs of the clients; and (d) expand our market presence into the United States, Latin America and Europe in order to respond to the international validation and compliance demands of our clients. Since our business is conducted mainly in Puerto Rico, our business may be affected to the extent that the Puerto Rico’s current economic problems affect the decision of our customers and potential customers to locate in Puerto Rico or to continue or expand their existing operations.

Recently, some of our clients, mostly triggered by worldwide operations consolidation, have reduced or discontinued some or all of their Puerto Rico operations. Our strategy to penetrate the United States market has been successful in gaining new customers and revenues, and has also partially offset the Puerto Rico market decline in revenues during the six months ended April 30, 2008 by approximately $1.5million, for a total net revenue decrease in that period of approximately $0.4 million. In order to maintain volume in the Puerto Rico market we are constantly ensuring that we are price competitive and have adjusted our pricing and gross margin structure accordingly. This strategy has affected our net gross margin by decreasing it by approximately 3.4 percentage points over the six month ended in April 30, 2008 when compared to the same period last year. In order to mitigate our gross margin decline we started to implement cost containment measures during the quarter ended April 30, 2008.

We have plans during our third quarter of 2008 to refocus our Puerto Rico operations strategy and reduce its overhead costs accordingly. In addition, we will continue pursuing new markets as part of our growth strategy.
 
We have a well-established and consistent relationship with the major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies in Puerto Rico and the United States which provides us access to affiliated companies in other markets. We see opportunities in markets that could yield profitable margins using our professional consulting force and also provide new services such as those performed by our new microbiological testing laboratory facility.

As part of our growth strategy and our plans to enter new markets, we have invested in our infrastructure to support our expansion plans. This investment includes facilities, systems and, the strengthening of our executive staff to support our new laboratory facility, our market expansions in the United States, and most recently, Europe. In addition, we will invest a total of approximately $1.4 million in equipment and improvements for the new microbiological testing lab which is scheduled to open during our fiscal year 2008. As of April 30, 2008, we have invested approximately $1.2 million and have budgeted the balance for the remainder of our fiscal year 2008. Our new microbiological testing facility will incorporate the latest technology and test methodologies meeting pharmacopoeia industry standards and regulations. We will offer microbiological testing and related services to our core industries already serviced as well as the cosmetic and food industries.

Although few customers represent a significant source of revenue, our functions are not a continuous process, accordingly, the client base for which our services are typically rendered, on a project-by-project basis, changes regularly. For the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, four customers accounted for approximately 65% of revenue, in both periods. For the year ended October 31, 2007, five customers accounted for approximately 66.7% of revenue. For the year ended October 31, 2006, four customers accounted for approximately 73.0% of revenue. The loss of or significant reduction in the scope of work performed for any major customer could impair our ability to operate profitably.

On August 2007, Pharma-PR filed in Puerto Rico an application for tax exemption under Act 135 of December 2, 1997. The exemption, if granted, may provide relief on various Puerto Rico taxes, including income tax, mostly for our new microbiological testing facility. The application obtained the favorable endorsement from the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, but still needs final approval from the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury and the Puerto Rico Department of State. In May 2008 a new tax incentive law (“Act 73”) was enacted. The Company plans to convert the application for tax exemption or grant under the old Act 135 to the new Act 73. If granted, the Company will be exempt from various taxes, including income tax, in additional operating activities.

18


On January 9, 2006, we acquired, for $300,000, from the individual who was our executive vice president and chief operating officer during February and March 2006, certain assets of Integrated Validation Service, a United States-based business that performs consulting services for the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. These assets include a client list and the validation compliance service business that was operated by that individual. The purchase price was paid in three installments during fiscal year 2006, each in the amount of $100,000. We also hired nine former employees of the business. This acquisition was made pursuant to our strategy to expand our operations beyond Puerto Rico with a view to lessening our dependence upon a small number of Puerto Rico pharmaceutical companies. Revenues from our United States operations for the six months ended in April 30, 2008 and 2007 were approximately $1,991,000 and $533,000, respectively, and for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $2,322,000 and $678,000, respectively.

On January 25, 2006, we acquired Pharma-PR in a transaction which was accounted for as a reverse acquisition, with Pharma-PR being deemed the accounting acquirer. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, we paid Elizabeth Plaza, the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR, $10,000,000 plus 1,150,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, Ms. Plaza was to receive three payments, each in the amount of $2,750,000, payable on January 25, 2007, 2008 and 2009. As of April 30, 2008, only the payment of $2.75 million due January 2009 remains outstanding. In 2006 we also paid Ms. Plaza $88,161 because Pharma-PR’s net tangible book value exceeded $5,500,000 and $125,227 to reimburse Ms. Plaza for taxes which she paid personally on our income during the period December 1, 2005 to January 24, 2006. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

As a result of the reverse acquisition that closed on January 25, 2006, Pharma-PR is treated as the accounting acquirer and the results of operations for periods prior to January 25, 2006 reflect only the operations of Pharma-PR.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. We believe the following are the critical accounting policies that impact the consolidated financial statements.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments (excluding obligations under capital leases and amounts due to affiliate): cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, are considered reasonable estimates of fair value due to their short-term nature. Management believes, based on current rates, that the fair value of its obligations under capital leases and amounts due to affiliate approximates the carrying amount.

19


Revenue Recognition

Revenue is primarily derived from: (1) time and materials contracts (representing approximately 90% of total revenues), which is recognized by applying the proportional performance model, whereby revenue is recognized as performance occurs, and (2) short-term fixed-fee contracts or "not to exceed" contracts (approximately 10% of total revenues), which revenue is recognized similarly, except that certain milestones also have to be reached before revenue is recognized. If the Company determines that a fixed-fee or “not to exceed” contract will result in a loss, the Company recognizes the estimated loss in the period in which such determination is made.

Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include investments in a money market obligations trust that is registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at their estimated realizable value. Accounts are deemed past due when payment has not been received within the stated time period. The Company's policy is to review individual past due amounts periodically and write off amounts for which all collection efforts are deemed to have been exhausted. Due to the nature of the Company’s customers, bad debts are accounted for using the direct write-off method whereby an expense is recognized only when a specific account is determined to be uncollectible. The effect of using this method approximates that of the allowance method.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires an asset and liability approach method of accounting for income taxes. This method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements. The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Property and equipment

Owned property and equipment, and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Equipment and vehicles under capital leases are stated at the lower of fair market value or net present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the leases.

Depreciation and amortization of owned assets are provided for, when placed in service, in amount sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives, using straight-line basis. Assets under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized, over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or lease term. Major renewals and betterments that extend the life of the assets are capitalized, while expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred.

The Company evaluates for impairment its long-lived assets to be held and used, and long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Based on management estimates, no impairment of the operating properties was present.

Intangible assets

Definite-lived intangible assets, such as customer lists and covenants not to compete, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.

20


Stock-based Compensation

Effective November 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) using the modified prospective method, which results in the provisions of SFAS 123R being applied to the consolidated financial statements on a prospective basis. Under the modified prospective recognition method, restatement of consolidated income from prior periods is not required, and accordingly, the Company has not provided such restatements. Under the modified prospective provisions of SFAS 123R, compensation expense is recorded for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that were outstanding on November 1, 2006 and all subsequent awards. SFAS 123R requires that all stock-based compensation expense be recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of awards that will be forfeited. The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at grant date. SFAS 123R also amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”, to require that excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation be reflected as cash flows from financing activities rather than cash flows from operating activities. The Company does not recognize such cash flow from financing activities since there has been no tax benefit related to the stock-based compensation.

Income Per Share of Common Stock

Basic income per share of common stock is calculated dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted income per share includes the dilution of common stock equivalents.

The diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding were calculated using the treasury stock method for the respective periods.

Foreign Operations

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is its local currency. The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation effect for subsidiaries using a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar is included as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income.

The Company’s intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables that the Company considers to be of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income, while gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from those international subsidiaries for which the Company anticipates settlement in the foreseeable future are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The net gains and losses recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income were not significant for the periods presented.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the April 30, 2007 and October 31, 2006 consolidated financial statements to conform them to the April 30, 2008 and October 31, 2007 consolidated financial statements presentation. Such reclassifications do not have a material effect on net income as previously reported.

21


New Accounting Pronouncements

1. In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R requires: the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be measured at fair value as of the acquisition date; liabilities related to contingent consideration to be remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting period; and acquisition-related costs to be expensed as these are incurred. SFAS 141R also requires additional disclosures of information surrounding a business combination. The provisions of SFAS 141R are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and apply to business combinations that are completed on or after the date of adoption. The Company has not yet adopted this pronouncement, but expects that the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions the Company completes after the effective date, if any.

2. In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This Statement applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited.

Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

3. In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASB’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”.

Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

4. In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 “Fair Value Measurement”. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this Statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The provisions of this Statement should be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this Statement is initially applied, except for certain exceptions stated in the Statement.

The implementation of this Statement had no significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

5. In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The application of this standard had no significant effect on the Company's results of operations or its financial condition.
 
6. Other recently issued FASB Statements or Interpretations, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins, and AICPA Emerging Issue Task Force Consensuses have either been implemented or are not applicable to the Company.

22

 
Results of Operations

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 compared to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.

The following table sets forth our statements of operations for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006, (dollars in thousands) and as a percentage of revenue: 
 
 
 
Years Ended October 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
2006
 
Revenues
 
$
16,205
   
100.0
%
$
14,184
   
100.0
%
Cost of revenues
   
9,381
   
57.9
%
 
8,116
   
57.2
%
Gross profit
   
6,824
   
42.1
%
 
6,068
   
42.8
%
Selling, general and administrative costs
   
3,176
   
19.6
%
 
2,226
   
15.7
%
Interest expense
   
392
   
2.4
%
 
393
   
2.8
%
Interest income
   
107
   
0.7
%
 
49
   
0.3
%
Loss on disposition of property
   
26
   
0.2
%
 
4
   
0.0
%
Income before income taxes
   
3,337
   
20.6
%
 
3,495
   
24.6
%
Income taxes expense (1)
   
1,436
   
8.9
%
 
1,160
   
8.2
%
Net income (1)
   
1,901
   
11.7
%
 
2,335
   
16.4
%
 

(1)
We were treated as an N Corporation under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, which is similar to an S Corporation under the Internal Revenue Code, prior to the reverse acquisition. As a result, we did not pay any income tax through January 25, 2006. Subsequently, we have been subject to income tax in Puerto Rico. If we had not been treated as an N Corporation during a portion of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, our income before income taxes would have been taxed at rates ranging from 39% to 41.5%. The following table shows the income before income taxes, pro forma income taxes and pro forma net income in dollars (dollars in thousands) and as a percentage of revenue:

 
 
Years Ended October 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
2006
 
Income before income taxes (actual for 2007 and 2006)
 
$
3,337
   
20.6
%
$
3,495
   
24.6
%
Income tax expense (2007 actual , 2006 pro-forma)
   
1,436
   
8.9
%
 
1,518
   
10.7
%
Net income (2007 actual , 2006 pro-forma)
 
$
1,901
   
11.7
%
$
1,977
   
13.9
%
 
Revenues . Revenues for the year ended October 31, 2007 were $16.2 million, an increase of $2 million, or 14%, from the revenue of $14.2 million in the prior year. The increase is mainly attributable to a project in the United States market which generated $1.6 million and other projects attributable to the Puerto Rico market.

Cost of revenues; gross margin . Our gross margin decreased from 42.8% to 42.1% during the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year. The decrease of 0.7 percentage points is mainly attributable to the value of the options granted to our employees and consultants which impacted our professional personnel benefits for an amount of approximately 0.4 percentage points of revenues.
 
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses . Total expenses were approximately $3.2 million during the year ended October 31, 2007, an increase of approximately $950,000, or 42.7%, from the prior year. Such increase resulted mainly from expenses related to the expansion of our executive staff with the resulting increase in executive compensation, the increase in the monthly lease payments of our main resources facility, and development expenses incurred for our new microbiology laboratory. In addition, during fiscal 2006, from November 1, 2005 through January 24, 2006, when we completed the reverse acquisition, we were taxed as an N Corporation under the Puerto Rico Code, with the result that all of our taxable income was taxed directly to Ms. Plaza, as the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR. During this period, we did not accrue any compensation to Ms. Plaza.

Interest Expense . We have been recognizing imputed interest expense incurred in connection with the long-term obligations to Ms. Plaza which originated as a result of the reverse acquisition. This expense will decrease as annual payments are made.

Income Tax Expense . The increase in the income tax expense results from a change in our tax status. We became a regular corporation taxpayer effective January 25, 2006. Prior to that, we were covered under the provisions of Subchapter N of Subtitle A of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code which are similar to Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code in that our taxable income was taxed to the stockholders. The statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico is 39%, but adjusted to 41.5% for 2006 and 2007.

23


Net Income . As a result of the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and the taxation of our net income for the entire year ended 2007, our net income for the year ended October 2007 decreased to approximately $1,901,000, or $0.10 per share (basic) and $0.09 per share (diluted), a decline of approximately $434,000, or 18.6%, from net income of $2,335,000, or $0.22 per share (basic) and $0.13 per share (diluted), for the year ended October 2006.

In fiscal year 2006 the basic and diluted income per share were also affected by the nature of the securities issued in our private placement that was completed contemporaneously with the reverse acquisition in January 2006. At that time, we issued shares of series A preferred stock which were convertible into 15,998,800 shares of common stock. The series A preferred stock was automatically converted into the 15,998,800 shares on April 25, 2006, when we increased our authorized capital stock. As a result, the shares of common stock that were issued upon conversion of the series A preferred stock are included in determining diluted earnings per share from January 25, 2006 until April 24, 2006 and in determining basic earnings per share thereafter.
  
Six months ended April 30, 2008 compared to Six months ended April 30, 2007.

The following table sets forth our statements of operations for the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, (dollars in thousands) and as a percentage of revenue:
 
   
 
 Six months ended April 30,  
 
   
 
2008  
 
2007   
 
Revenues
 
$
7,302
   
100.0
%
$
7,755
   
100.0
%
Cost of revenues
   
4,582
   
62.7
%
 
4,595
   
59.3
%
Gross profit  
   
2,720
   
37.3
%
 
3,160
   
40.7
%
Selling, general and administrative costs  
   
1,502
   
20.6
%
 
1,475
   
19.0
%
Interest expense  
   
133
   
1.8
%
 
214
   
2.8
%
Interest income  
   
58
   
0.8
%
 
44
   
0.6
%
Loss on disposition of property
   
-
   
0.0
%
 
26
   
0.3
%
Income before income taxes  
   
1,143
   
15.7
%
 
1,489
   
19.2
%
Income taxes expense  
   
515
   
7.1
%
 
642
   
8.3
%
Net income  
   
628
   
8.6
%
 
847
   
10.9
%

Revenues. For the six-month period ended April 30, 2008 service revenues were $7.3 million, a net decrease of approximately $0.4 million or 5.8% from the comparable six-month period last year. Decrease in Puerto Rico market service revenues by approximately $1.9 million was partially offset by gains in the United States market of approximately $1.5 million.

Service revenue gains in the United States market are attributable to the company’s strategy to enter in new markets. This strategy has partially offset the service revenue loss sustained in the Puerto Rico market. Decreases in the Puerto Rico market service revenue are mostly due to closing and decrease in operations of some pharmaceutical plants located in Puerto Rico, triggered by operations consolidation.

 Cost of revenues; gross margin. The gross margin decreased by 3.4 percentage points in the six-month period ending April 30,2008, when compared to the same period last year. The net gross margin reduction is mainly attributable to our strategy to maintain volume in the Puerto Rico market by keeping its pricing competitiveness.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and Administrative expenses were approximately $1,502,000 for the six months ended in April 30, 2008. These expenses represent an increase of $27,000 for the six months ended in April 30, 2008, as compared to the same period last year. Expense containment measures implemented in the quarter ended April 30, 2008, geared to offset the Puerto Rico market revenue decline, have favorably affected the quarter ended April 30, 2008 by $102,000 and the trend for the six-months ended April 30, 2008.
 
Interest Expense. We have been recognizing imputed interest expense incurred in connection with the long-term obligations originated pursuant to a plan and agreement of merger dated January 25, 2006 for the acquisition of Pharma-PR. This expense decreases as annual payments are made. The last installment under the plan and agreement of merger is due January 25, 2009.

Income Taxes Expense. For the current fiscal year we are no longer subject to a 2.5% additional special tax imposed by the Puerto Rico Act No. 41 of August 1, 2005. Therefore, for fiscal year 2008 our statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico has decreased to 39% from 41.5% last year. The decrease on income taxes expense is attributable to this factor and the decrease of income before income tax.

24


Net Income. Our net income for the six months ended in April 30, 2008 was approximately $628,000, a decline to last year comparable period for approximately $219,000, or 26%.

For the six-month period ended in April 30, 2008 earnings per common share (basic and diluted) was $0.03, while last year comparable six-month period was $0.04 (basic and diluted).

Our net income was affected by the decrease in gross margin, cost containment measures in selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by the favorable variances in interest expense, interest income and statutory tax rate
  
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including planned capital expenditures. For the six months ended April 30, 2008 we have generated cash flow from operations of approximately $1 million and working capital of approximately $1.3 million, notwithstanding within the same period we have invested in a laboratory facility approximately $ 1 million, and have made a payment of $2.75 million pursuant the 2006 Pharma-PR acquisition agreement. Under the agreement, a final payment of $2.75 million is due on January 25, 2009.

We are pursuing possible opportunities of expanding our operations beyond Puerto Rico, and in furtherance of this plan, we have set up facilities in Ireland to offer our services to companies in the pharmaceutical and related industries in Ireland. To the extent that we are able to expand our operations, either by acquisition or by the establishment of operations in a new locale, we will incur additional overhead, and there may be a delay between the period we commence operations and our generation of cash flow from operations. Present cash outlays for our Ireland operation have not been significant.

Our primary cash needs consist of payment of compensation to our professional staff, overhead expenses, statutory taxes, and payments pursuant to the Agreement terms for the acquisition of Pharma-PR.

Management believes that based on current levels of operations and anticipated growth and cash flows from operations, the collectability of high quality customer receivables will be sufficient to fund anticipated expenses and satisfy other possible long-term contractual commitments, including our obligations to pay the installments due pursuant to the agreement relating to the acquisition of Pharma-PR, for the next twelve months.

While uncertainties relating to competition, the industries and geographical regions served by us and other regulatory matters exist within the consulting services industry, management is not aware of any trends or events likely to have a material adverse effect on liquidity or its financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Pharma-Bio was not involved in any significant off-balance sheet arrangement during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 or during the six months ended April 30, 2008.

25


BUSINESS

We offer consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry. Our engineering and life science professionals include former quality professionals from pharmaceutical companies, and experienced and well-trained professionals with bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees in health sciences and engineering. Our objective is to offer a flexible, common sense and cost effective approach to meet our clients’ needs, strategies and budget objectives.

We have established quality systems for our employees which include:
 
 
·
Training Programs - including a Current Good Manufacturing Practices exam prior to recruitment and quarterly refreshers;
 
 
·
Recruitment Full Training Program - including employee manual, dress code, time sheets and good projects management and control procedures, job descriptions, and firm operating and administration procedures;
 
 
·
Safety Program - including OSHA and health (medical surveillance, certificate of good health, drug screening, background checks including conduct certificates, alcohol and smoke free policy); and
 
 
·
Code of Ethics - A code of ethics and business conduct is used and enforced as one of the most significant company controls on personal behavior.

In addition, we have implemented procedures to respond to client complaints and customer satisfaction survey procedures. As part of our employee performance appraisal annual process, our clients receive an evaluation form for employee project performance feedback, including compliance with our code of ethics.

In January 2006, we acquired certain assets for a purchase price of $300,000. The acquired assets include a client list and a validation compliance service business in the United States market. The purchase price was paid during fiscal year 2006 in three installments of $100,000. We have also hired nine former employees of that business.

In September 2007, we entered into the Ireland market through the formation of an 80%- owned subsidiary. We intend to provide the Ireland market the same services we are currently providing in the Puerto Rico and United States markets.

26


Business Strategy and Objectives

We are actively pursuing new markets as part of our growth strategy. We have a well-established and consistent relationship with the major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies in Puerto Rico and United States which provides us access to affiliated companies in other markets. We see opportunities in markets that could yield profitable margins using our professional consulting force and also provide new services such as those performed by our new microbiological testing laboratory facility.

As part of our growing strategy and our plans to globalize and enter in new markets, we have invested on our infrastructure to support our expansion plans. We expect to invest approximately $1.4 million in equipment and improvements for a new microbiological testing lab which is scheduled to open in 2008. As of April 30, 2008 we have invested approximately $1.1 million and we will be investing the balance during the year ended October 31, 2008. In addition, in fiscal year 2007 we strengthened our executive staff to support our new laboratory facility, our market expansions in the United States, and most recently, Europe. We have also moved our headquarters to new facilities that will house our microbiology testing laboratory, our new customer-specialized training facilities, and our operational and administrative offices.

Our business strategy is based on a commitment to provide premium quality and professional consulting services and reliable customer service to our customer base. Our business strategy and objectives are as follow:
 
 
·
Continue growth in consulting services in each technical service, quality assurance, regulatory compliance, validation, engineering, laboratory testing and manufacturing departments by achieving greater market penetration from our marketing and sales efforts;
 
 
·
Continue to enhance our technical consulting services through an increase in professional staff through internal growth and acquisitions that provides the best solutions to our customers’ needs;
 
 
·
Motivate our professionals and support staff by implementing a compensation program which includes both individual performance and overall company performance as elements of compensation;
 
 
·
Create a pleasant corporate culture and emphasize operational quality safety and timely service;
 
 
·
Continue to maintain our reputation as a trustworthy and highly ethical partner; and
 
 
·
Efficiently manage our operating and financial costs and expenses.

Technical Consulting Services

We have established a reputation as a premier technical consulting services firm to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing industries in Puerto Rico. These services include regulatory compliance, validation, technology transfer, engineering, safety and environmental, training, project management and process support. We have approximately 25 clients that are among the largest pharmaceutical, chemical manufacturing, medical device and biotechnology companies in Puerto Rico. We are actively participating in exhibitions, conferences, conventions and seminars as either exhibitors, sponsors or conference speakers.

Marketing

We conduct our marketing activities primarily within the local Puerto Rico as well as the United States and other marketplaces. We actively utilize our project managers and leaders who are currently managing consulting service contracts at various client locations to also market consulting services to their existing and past client relationships. Our senior management is also actively involved in the marketing process, especially in marketing to major accounts. Our senior management and staff also concentrate on developing new business opportunities and focus on the larger customer accounts (by number of professionals or dollar volume) and responding to prospective customers’ requests for proposals.

27


Principal Customers

Three customers accounted for 10% or more of our revenue during the six months ended April 30, 2008 and the year ended October 31, 2007, while in the six months ended April 30, 2007 two customers and in the year ended October 31, 2006 four accounted for more than 10% of our revenue. In spite of the fact that just a few customers represent a significant source of revenue, our functions are not a continuous process, accordingly, the client base for which our services are typically rendered, on a project-by-project basis, changes regularly.

Subsequent to October 31, 2007 one of the major customers, which represented 23% of the Company’s 2007 revenues, announced its plans to close its Puerto Rico operations during 2008. As of April 30, 2008, the outstanding balance of this customer represented 0.5% of total accounts receivable. Management considers the amount to be fully collectible.

Competition

We are engaged in a highly competitive and fragmented industry. Some of our competitors are, on an overall basis, larger than us or are subsidiaries of larger companies, and therefore may possess greater resources than us. Furthermore, because the technical professional aspects of our business do not usually require large amounts of capital, there is relative ease of market entry for a new entrant possessing acceptable professional qualifications. Accordingly, we compete with regional, national, and international firms. Within the Puerto Rico, United States and Ireland markets, certain competitors, including local competitors, may possess greater resources than we do as well as better access to clients and potential clients.

Our competitors for validation and compliance consulting services consist of large public and private companies such as Fluor Corporation, Foster Wheeler Corp., Siemens, Skanska Pharmaceutical, and Washington Group International, as well as smaller validation companies located in Puerto Rico, mainland United States and Ireland.  Although we are the largest validation consulting firm in Puerto Rico, as measured by number of professionals dedicated to providing validation and compliance consulting services in Puerto Rico, these companies, which offer consulting services similar to those we offer, have significantly more resources than we have and may have relationships with pharmaceutical, biotechnology and chemical manufacturing companies in the United States or in other parts of the world.

Competition for validation and consulting services is based primarily on reputation, track record, experience, quality of service and price. We believe that we enjoy significant competitive advantages over other consulting service firms because of our historical market share within Puerto Rico (15 years), brand name, reputation and track record with many of the major pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies which have presence in the markets we are pursuing.

Because of recent consolidations in the pharmaceutical consulting business in Puerto Rico, we are faced with an increasing number of larger companies that offer a wider range of services than we do and which also have better access to capital. We believe that larger and better-capitalized competitors have enhanced abilities to compete for both clients and skilled professionals. In addition, one or more of our competitors may develop and implement methodologies that result in affecting their, and thus, potentially, our profit.

The market of qualified and/or experienced professionals that are capable of providing technical consulting services is very competitive and consists primarily of our competitors as well as companies in the pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology and medical device industries who are our clients and potential clients. In seeking qualified personnel we market our name recognition in the Puerto Rico market, our reputation with our client, salary and benefits, quality training and a low turnover of qualified employees.

28


Intellectual Property Rights

We have no proprietary software or products. We rely on non-disclosure agreements with our employees to protect the proprietary software and other proprietary information of our clients. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could harm our business.

Personnel

We currently employ 14 administrative and technical staff employees and approximately 145 technical personnel who provide consulting services to our clients. Most of our technical personnel are employees, although we do engage independent consultants on a contract basis. In general, when we subcontract independent consultants, it is for specific projects where we do not expect to require their services on a long-term basis. If we see a longer term requirement, we may replace the independent consultants with our own employees, or extend the contracts to the independent contractor as the need and availability dictates. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be good. Our subsidiary, Pharma-PR, was recognized and awarded by Hewitt Associates, 8 th place as one of the “Puerto Rico 20 best employers” in 2006.

Properties

In February 2007, we entered into an agreement for our new main resource facilities with Plaza Professional Center, Inc., a company controlled by Elizabeth Plaza. These facilities will house our microbiology testing laboratory to open in 2008, our new customer-specialized training facilities and, our operational and administrative offices. The agreement is for a five year term, with initial monthly payments of $18,750, which will increase by 5% annually. The new agreement also requires the payment of utilities, property taxes, insurance and a portion of expenses incurred by the affiliate in connection with the maintenance of common areas. The agreement provides a five year renewal option.

We also lease office space in Limerick, Pennsylvania. The lease was renewed on July 31, 2007 for a term of three years at a monthly rental of $1,050 during the first year, $1,100 during the second year, and $1,150 for the third year. The agreement may be terminated earlier by giving a prior 90 days written notice.

Our Ireland start-up office facilities are located in Cork, Ireland. Currently, the facilities are under a month-to-month lease with monthly payments of approximately $750.

We believe that our present facilities, including our new facility in Puerto Rico, are adequate to meet our needs and that, if we require additional space, it is available on commercially reasonable terms.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be a party to legal proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

29


MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our directors and executive officers.
 
Name
 
Age
 
Position
Elizabeth Plaza
 
44
 
President, Chairman of the Board and Director
Nélida Plaza
 
40
 
Vice President and Secretary
Pedro J. Lasanta
 
48
 
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance and Administration
Dov Perlysky (2)
 
45
 
Director
Kirk Michel (1) (2)
 
53
 
Director
Howard Spindel (1)
 
63
 
Director
Irving Wiesen (1) (2)
 
52
 
Director
 

1
Member of the audit and compensation committees.
2
Member of the mergers and acquisition committee.
 
Elizabeth Plaza has been president and sole director of Pharma-PR since 1997, when the Company was incorporated after operating as a sole proprietorship since 1993, and she has been our president and chief executive officer since January 25, 2006. Ms. Plaza holds a B.S. in Pharmaceutical Sciences, magna cum laude, from the School of Pharmacy of the University of Puerto Rico. She was a 40 under 40 Caribbean Business Award recipient in 2002, the 2003 recipient of Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur of the Year Award in Health Science, one of the 2003 recipients of the Puerto Rico Powerful Business Women Award, elected as Puerto Rico Manufacturers Association 2004 (Metropolitan-West Region) Executive of the Year and Puerto Rico 2008 Executive of the Year. Ms. Plaza is a licensed pharmacist.

Nélida Plaza has been vice president of operations of Pharma-PR since January 2004 and has been our vice president and secretary since January 25, 2006. In July 2000, Ms. Plaza joined Pharma-PR as a project management consultant. Prior thereto, she was a unit operations leader and safety manager at E.I. DuPont De Nemours where she was involved with the development, support and audit of environmental, safety and occupational health programs. Ms. Plaza holds a M.S. in Environmental Management from the University of Houston in Clear Lake and a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico. Nélida Plaza was recognized by Casiano Communications as one of the 40 under 40 distinguished executives in Puerto Rico.

Pedro J. Lasanta has been our chief financial officer and vice president - finance and administration since November 2007. Mr. Lasanta is a certified public accountant. From 2006 until October 2007, Mr. Lasanta was in private practice as an accountant, tax and business counselor. From 1999 until 2006, Mr. Lasanta was the Chief Financial Officer for Pearle Vision Center PR, Inc. In the past, Mr. Lasanta was also an audit manager for Ernst & Young, formerly Arthur Young & Company He is a cum laude graduate in business administration (accounting) from the University of Puerto Rico.

30


Dov Perlysky had been our president, has been a director since 2004 and has been the managing member of Nesher, LLC a private investment firm since 2000. On January 25, 2006, in connection with the reverse acquisition, Mr. Perlysky resigned as president and became a consultant to us. From 1998 until 2002, Mr. Perlysky was a vice president in the private client group of Laidlaw Global Securities, a registered broker-dealer. He received his B.S. in Mathematics and Computer Science from the University of Illinois in 1985 and a Masters in Management from the JL Kellogg Graduate School of Northwestern University in 1991. Mr. Perlysky is a director of Engex, Inc., a closed-end mutual fund and he is also a director for Highlands State Bank.

Kirk Michel, a director since January 25, 2006, has been a managing director of KEMA Advisors, Inc., a boutique financial advisory firm located in Hillsborough, North Carolina since 2002. KEMA Advisors provides financial advisory services to middle market companies and governmental agencies. From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Michel was the co-founder and a managing director of Bahia Group Holdings, LLC which provided corporate finance, public finance and merger and acquisition services to middle market companies and governmental agencies. Mr. Michel holds a M.B.A. degree from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business and a B.A. in Economics from Northwestern University.

Howard Spindel, a director since January 25, 2006, has been a consultant with Integrated Management Solutions, a securities industry consulting and recruitment firm which he founded, since 1985. In this capacity, he has also acted as a financial and operations principal, general securities principal, registered representative and options principal for several broker-dealers during this period. He is also a director of Engex, Inc., a closed-end mutual fund. Mr. Spindel received a B.S. in accounting from Hunter College.

Irving Wiesen, a director since January 25, 2006, has practiced as an attorney specializing in food and drug law and regulation in the pharmaceutical and medical device industries for more than twenty-five years. For more than the past five years he has been of counsel to the New York law firms, Ullman, Shapiro and Ullman, LLP and Cohen, Tauber, Spievack & Wagner. Prior to that, Mr. Wiesen was a partner in the New York food and drug law firm, Bass & Ullman, and also served as division counsel of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Wiesen represents pharmaceutical, medical device and biotechnology companies in all aspects of FDA regulation, corporate practice and compliance, litigation and allied commercial transactions. Mr. Wiesen received his J.D. degree from the New York University School of Law and holds an M.A. in English Literature from Columbia University and a B.A., cum laude, from Yeshiva University.

Elizabeth Plaza and Nélida Plaza are sisters. There is no other family relationship among our officers and directors.

Board Committees

The board of directors has three committees, the audit committee, the compensation committee and the mergers and acquisition committee. Kirk Michel, Howard Spindel and Irving Wiesen, each of whom is an independent director, are the members of the audit and compensation committees. Mr. Spindel is the audit committee financial expert. Dov Perlysky, Kirk Michel and Irving Wiesen are the members of the mergers and acquisition committee. The mergers and acquisition committee was formed to assist us with our business strategy and objectives as they relate to acquisitions discussed above.

31


Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all its senior management and directors.

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

Set forth below is information for our Chief Executive Officer and the only other officer whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007.

Name and Principal Position
 
Fiscal Year
 
Salary
 
Bonus
 
           Option          
Awards ($)(1)
 
All Other
Compensation
 
Total
 
Elizabeth Plaza, President and
Chief Executive Officer
   
2007
2006
 
$
250,000
173,378
   
 
$
 
$
24,828
34,423
 
$
274,828
207,801
 
Nélida Plaza, Vice President
   
2007
2006
   
150,000
130,120
   
   
6,481
   
11,592
17,094
   
168,073
147,214
 
 
(1)
Amount shown do not reflect compensation received by the officers. Instead, the amounts shown are the compensation costs recognized by us for option grants as determined upon our adoption of FAS 123R in Fiscal 2007.

Prior to the reverse acquisition, Pharma-PR, which was then wholly owned by Elizabeth Plaza, had granted Nélida Plaza an option to purchase 500 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $138.19 per share. At the consummation of the reverse merger in January 2006, we granted Ms. Nélida Plaza options to purchase 131,455 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.7344 per share, the fair market value on the date of grant, of which an option to purchase 94,083 shares of our common stock was issued to replace options granted prior to the reverse acquisition.

No bonuses were paid to any of the officers and no stock or other equity compensation was provided to any of the officers during the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006.

Other compensation for Elizabeth Plaza in fiscal year 2007 and 2006 includes Ms. Plaza’s automobile allowance pursuant her employment agreement. In addition, in fiscal year 2006, other compensation also includes personal expenses incurred prior to January 25, 2006 when she was the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR.

Other compensation paid to Nélida Plaza includes the following:
 
 
 
Years Ended October 31,
 
Description
 
 2007
 
 2006
 
Housing
 
$
 
$
4,428
 
Life insurance
   
   
2,005
 
Automobile allowance, including lease payment
   
11,592
   
10,660
 
 
 
$
11,592
 
$
17,093
 

Payments for housing and life insurance were discontinued after December 31, 2005.

32


Prior to the reverse acquisition, Pharma-PR was taxed as a Subchapter N corporation under the Puerto Rico tax law, which is similar to treatment as an S Corporation under the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, Elizabeth Plaza was taxed on Pharma-PR’s income. Up to December 2005, we did not pay Elizabeth Plaza any salary. We made distributions to Ms. Plaza in the amount of $834,000 for the year ended October 31, 2006 and approximately $8.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2005.

As a result of our acquisition of Pharma-PR, Pharma-PR’s status as a Subchapter N corporation terminated on January 25, 2006, the date of our acquisition of Pharma-PR. Ms. Plaza is responsible for any taxes which are payable as a result of the Pharma-PR’s loss of its Subchapter N status under the Puerto Rico tax laws. However, we, and not Ms. Plaza, are responsible for any taxes on the Pharma-PR’s taxable income during the period from the December 1, 2005 to January 24, 2006, which amounted to $125,227, and was paid on June 15, 2006 .

Employment Agreements

On January 25, 2006, we entered into employment agreements with Elizabeth Plaza and Nélida Plaza. Our agreement with Elizabeth Plaza, recently extended to January 1, 2010, provides that Ms. Plaza will serve as our president and chief executive officer for which she will receive a salary at the annual rate of $250,000. The Company will also provide Ms. Plaza with an automobile allowance at the annual rate of $24,828, discretionary bonuses and stock options or other equity-based incentives as shall be determined by our compensation committee, except that her bonus shall not be less than 4% or more than 50% of her salary. If we terminate Ms. Plaza’s employment other than for cause or as a result of her death or disability, we are required to pay Ms. Plaza the balance of her compensation for her employment terms and her consulting term and other benefits, including a pro rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to her, and her obligations under her non-competition provision terminate. Since the bonus is discretionary, with a minimum bonus of 4% of Ms. Plaza’s salary, unless the compensation committee shall have provided for a greater bonus prior to the termination of Ms. Plaza’s employment without cause, Ms. Plaza would not be entitled to a bonus greater than $10,000, which is 4% of $250,000, the amount of the bonus to be based on the remaining employment term. Upon termination of the agreement Ms. Plaza will serve as a consultant under terms to be negotiated.

Our agreement with Nélida Plaza provides that Ms. Plaza will serve as vice president for a term of three years for which she will receive annual compensation at the annual rate of $150,000. She is also entitled to bonus compensation as is determined by the compensation committee, not to exceed 50% of her salary. We also agreed to make the lease payments on the automobile she currently leases. Such payments are at the annual rate of approximately $11,592. If we terminate Ms. Plaza’s employment other than for cause or as a result of her death or disability, we are required to pay Ms. Plaza her compensation for the balance of the term and other benefits, including a pro rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to her, and her obligations under her non-competition provision terminate. Since Ms. Plaza’s employment contract provides for a discretionary bonus, unless the compensation committee shall have provided for a bonus to Ms. Plaza prior to the termination of her employment without cause, Ms. Plaza would not be entitled to any bonus payment.

The employment agreements with both Elizabeth Plaza and Nélida Plaza provide that during the term of the agreement and for two years thereafter, the executive will not, directly or indirectly engage in a competing business or solicit any customer or seek to persuade any customer to reduce the amount of business it does with us or seek to persuade any employee to leave our employ.

On November 5, 2007 we entered into an employment agreement with Pedro Lasanta, our chief financial officer, pursuant to which we pay Mr. Lasanta an annual salary of $100,000 plus a monthly car allowance of $500. The agreement has a one-year term, which we may extend subject to the approval of the president and chief executive officer and the audit committee. Mr. Lasanta’s employment agreement has a non-competition provision pursuant to which he agrees that during the term of the agreement and for one year thereafter, Mr. Lasanta will not, directly or indirectly, engage in a competing business or solicit any customer or seek to persuade any customer to reduce the amount of business it does with us or seek to persuade any employee to leave our employ.

33


2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan

In October 2005, our board of directors adopted, and in April 2006, our stockholders approved, the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, covering 2,500,000 shares of common stock. The 2005 plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified options, stock grants, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based incentives to employees, including officers, and consultants. The 2005 Plan is to be administered by a committee of independent directors. In the absence of a committee, the plan is administered by the board of directors. Independent directors are not eligible for discretionary options. However, each newly elected independent director receives at the time of his or her election, a five-year option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at the market price on the date of his or her election. In addition, the plan provided for the annual grant of an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock on the first trading day of January of each year, commencing January 2007; however, on April 19, 2007, the stockholders amended the plan to increase the number of options granted to its independent directors annually from 5,000 to 10,000 shares of common stock. On April 19, 2007, the stockholders also amended the plan to provide for a grant to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock at the market price to each advisory board member on the date of his or her election and a grant of 5,000 options to each of them annually. The options to directors have a term of five years and become exercisable cumulatively as to 50% of the shares subject to the option six months from the date of grant and, as to the remaining 50%, 18 months from the date of grant. Pursuant to this provision, on January 25, 2006, options to purchase 25,000 shares at $0.7344 per share, being the fair market value on the date of grant, were automatically granted to Messrs. Kirk Michel, Howard Spindel and Irving Wiesen.  As authorized under the 2005 Plan, we made automatic options grants to our independent directors on January 3, 2007 and January 2, 2008 in the amount of 5,000 and 10,000 options to each independent director, respectively. The exercise price of the options granted on January 3, 2007 and January 2, 2008 was $.75 per share and $0.74 per share, respectively. Except for the price, these option grants have the same terms as the options granted to our independent directors on January 26, 2006.

Options intended to be incentive stock options must be granted at an exercise price per share which is not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and may have a term which is not longer than ten years. If the option holder holds 10% of our common stock, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant and the term of the option cannot exceed five years. As of April 30, 2008, there were outstanding options to purchase 1,506,772 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of approximately $0.7333 per share.

Option holders do not recognize taxable income upon the grant of either incentive or non-qualified stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. When employees exercise incentive stock options, they will not recognize taxable income upon exercise of the option, although the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise is included in income for purposes of computing their alternative minimum tax liability, if any. If certain holding period requirements are met, their gain or loss on a subsequent sale of the stock will be taxed at capital gain rates. Generally, long-term capital gains rates will apply to their full gain at the time of the sale of the stock, provided that they do not dispose of the stock made within two years from the date of grant of the option or within one year after your acquisition of such stock, and the option is exercised while they are employed by us or within three months of the termination of their employment or one year in the event of death or disability, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Employees who are residents of Puerto Rico are subject to the Puerto Rico Code, which may be different from tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code.

34

 
In general, upon the exercise a non-qualified option, the option holder will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price of the option and the fair market value of the shares on the date he or she exercises the option. Subject to certain limitations, we may deduct that amount as an expense for federal income tax purposes. In general, when the holders of shares issued on exercise of a nonqualified stock option sell their shares, any profit or loss is short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending upon the holding period for the shares and their basis in the shares will be the fair market value on the date of exercise.

Director Compensation

We do not pay any cash fees to our directors. Pursuant to our 2005 Plan, each independent director receives an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock on the date of his or her election, and, on the first trading day of January in each year thereafter, the independent director receives an option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Prior to April 2007, the automatic option grant to each independent director had been 5,000 options per year. Mr. Michel, Spindel and Wiesen are considered "independent directors."

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of independent directors for the year ended October 31, 2007.

 
Name
 
Fees Earned
or Paid
in Cash
 
Option
Awards (1)
 
Total
 
Kirk Michel
   
-
 
$
7,325
 
$
7,325
 
Howard Spindel
   
-
 
$
7,325
 
$
7,325
 
Irving Wiesen
   
-
 
$
7,325
 
$
7,325
 
 

(1) Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the directors. Instead, the amounts shown are the compensation costs recognized by us in fiscal year 2007 for option grants that were made to directors as determined pursuant to FAS 123R. The assumptions used to calculate the value of option awards are set forth under Note J of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Prospectus. During the year ended October 31, 2007, each independent director was granted options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock.

The option grants represent the automatic option grants of 5,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.75 per share which each independent director received on January 2, 2007 and an option grant of 5,000 shares on April 19, 2007 at an exercise price of $0.65 per share, which was approved by the Company's shareholders at its Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 19, 2007. These options have a term of five years from the grant date and an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The options are exercisable as to 50% of the shares subject to the option six months from the date of grant and as to the remaining 50% 18 months from the date of grant.

35


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table provides information as to shares of common stock beneficially owned as of June 20, 2008 by:
 
 
each director;
 
each officer named in the summary compensation table;
 
each person owning of record or known by us, based on information provided to us by the persons named below, to own beneficially at least 5% of our common stock; and
 
all directors and executive officers as a group.

Except as otherwise indicated each person has the sole power to vote and dispose of all shares of common stock listed opposite his name. Each person is deemed to own beneficially shares of common stock which are issuable upon exercise or conversion of currently convertible securities which are exercisable or convertible within 60 days of June 20, 2008. The beneficial ownership of each person named is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under these rules, a person is deemed to beneficially own the total number of shares of common stock which he or she owns plus the number of shares of common stock which are issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable securities. The percentage ownership of each person is the percentage that the number of shares beneficially owned by that person bears to the sum of (a) the outstanding common stock plus (b) the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise or conversion of those currently convertible securities that are owned by that stockholder.
 
 
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
 
Percentage
 
Elizabeth Plaza(1)
   
1,150,000
   
5.86
%
Dov Perlysky(2)
   
2,232,393
   
11.38
%
Kirk Michel(3)
   
540,906
   
2.73
%
Howard Spindel(4)
   
30,000
   
*
 
Irving Wiesen(4)
   
30,000
   
*
 
All officers and directors as a group (five individuals owning stock)(5)
   
2,915,460
   
14.07
%
San Juan Holdings, Inc.(6)
   
4,811,443
   
21.08
%
Venturetek LP(7)
   
4,697,990
   
22.18
%
Barron Partners LP(8)
   
3,899,174
   
18.59
%
 

*
Less than 1%.
 
(1)
Ms. Plaza's address is Sardinera Beach Building, Suite 2 Marginal Costa de Oro, Dorado, Puerto Rico 00646.
 
(2)
The shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Perlysky represent 1,164,554 shares of common stock owned by Krovim, LLC. Mr. Perlysky is the manager of Nesher, LLC, which is the manager of Krovim. Mr. Perlysky disclaims beneficial interest in the shares owned by Krovim. Shares owned by Mr. Perlysky includes 1,158,839 shares owned by LDP Family Partnership. Mr. Perlysky’s wife is general partner of LDP Family Partnership and Mr. Perlysky disclaims beneficial ownership in the securities owned by it. Mr. Perlysky's address is P.O.Box 339, Lawrence, NY 11559.
 
(3)
The shares of common stock beneficially owned by Mr. Michel consist of 30,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options, 340,706 shares of common stock owned by KEMA Advisors, of which Mr. Michel is managing director, and 170,200 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants held by KEMA Advisors.

36

 
(4)
The shares of common stock owned by each of Mr. Spindel and Mr. Wiesen represent shares issuable upon exercise of options.
 
(5)
Includes 90,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 170,200 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants.
 
(6)
Includes 3,211,324 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. Messrs. Ramon Dominguez and Addison M. Levi III have voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by San Juan Holdings, Inc. The mailing address for San Juan Holdings, Inc. is 255 Ponce de Leon Ave., Hato Rey, PR 00917.

(7)
Mr. David Selengut, the manager of TaurusMax LLC, which is the general partner of Venturetek, LP. has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Venturetek. The shares beneficially owned by Venturetek do not include 200 shares of common stock held by Mr. Selengut and 200 shares held by Mr. Selengut’s wife. Mr. Selengut disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by his wife. The mailing address for Venuretek, LP is 370 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

(8)
Mr. Andrew B. Worden, president of the general partner of Barron Partners, has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned by Barron Partners. The mailing address for Baron Partners LP is 730 fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10019.

37


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

On January 25, 2006, we acquired Pharma-PR from Elizabeth Plaza, as the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR. At the closing, we paid Ms. Plaza $10,000,000 and issued to Ms. Plaza 1,150,000 shares of common stock. In addition, pursuant to agreement Ms. Plaza was entitled to three payments, each in the amount of $2,750,000, on January 25, 2007, 2008 and 2009. As of April 30, 2008, we have made two of the payments to Ms. Plaza. As a condition to closing, Pharma-PR was required to have a net tangible book value of not less than $5,500,000, of which at least $2,000,000 was to be in cash, as of November 30, 2005, with the excess to be paid to Ms. Plaza. The amount due to Ms. Plaza under this provision was $88,161 and was paid on June 15, 2006. Pursuant to the merger agreement, we were required to reimburse Ms. Plaza for income tax which she paid on our income from December 1, 2005 until January 24, 2006. This amounted to $125,227 and was paid on June 15, 2006.

San Juan Holdings represented Pharma-PR and Elizabeth Plaza in connection with the reverse acquisition. For such services, we issued 600,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.06 per share, to San Juan Holdings. In our private placement of series A preferred stock and warrants, San Juan Holdings purchased three units. The purchase price for the three units was $750,000. The broker, which is an affiliate of San Juan Holdings, waived the commission and the non-accountable expense allowance with respect to such sales, and as a result, San Juan Holdings purchased the three units for a net payment of $652,500. The three units were comprised of 75,000 shares of series A preferred stock and warrants to purchase 510,600 shares of common stock. The shares of series A preferred stock became converted into 1,021,200 shares of common stock. We also issued 919 shares of common stock to San Juan Holdings as a result of our failure to filing the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part in a timely manner. We also paid an affiliate of San Juan Holdings a broker’s commission and non-accountable expense allowance of $195,000 for sales made to other purchasers in the private placement, and we issued to the affiliate three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 275,724 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.7344 per share.

KEMA Advisors, Inc., of which Kirk Michel, a director, is managing director, purchased one unit, consisting of 25,000 shares of series A preferred stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 170,200 shares of common stock for $250,000. The shares of series A preferred stock became converted into 340,400 shares of common stock. We also issued 306 shares of common stock to KEMA Advisors for our failure to file the registration statement in a timely manner.

38


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Our authorized capitalization consists of 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share.

Common Stock

Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and are entitled to share in such dividends as the board of directors, in its discretion, may declare from funds legally available. In the event of liquidation, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate ratably in the assets remaining after payment of liabilities.

Our directors are elected by a plurality vote. Because holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, holders or a single holder of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock present and voting at an annual stockholders meeting at which a quorum is present can elect all of our directors. Our stockholders have no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for or purchase additional shares of any class of stock or of any other securities.

The transfer agent for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Preferred Stock

The board of directors is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, which may be issued in series from time to time with such designations, rights, preferences and limitations as the board of directors may declare by resolution. The rights, preferences and limitations of separate series of preferred stock may differ with respect to such matters as may be determined by the board of directors, including, without limitation, the rate of dividends, method and nature of payment of dividends, terms of redemption, amounts payable on liquidation, sinking fund provisions (if any), conversion rights (if any) and voting rights. The potential exists, therefore, that additional shares of preferred stock might be issued which would grant dividend preferences and liquidation preferences to preferred stockholders over common stockholders. Unless the nature of a particular transaction and applicable statute require such approval, the board of directors has the authority to issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval. The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control without any further action by stockholders.

39

 
Investor Warrants

In connection with our January 2006 private placement, we issued warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share and warrants to purchase an additional 3,999,700 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.65 per shares. These warrants have a term which expires five years from the closing date and are callable by us if the closing price of our common stock is at least twice the exercise price of the warrants for 20 consecutive trading days. The warrants became exercisable when we filed our restated certificate of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

Other Warrants

As of April 30, 2008, warrants to purchase 249,600 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share were outstanding. These warrants are exercisable until January 16, 2014, and the holders have cashless exercise rights. The holders of these warrants have the same registration rights as are granted to Elizabeth Plaza with respect to the 1,150,000 shares of common stock issued to her pursuant to the merger agreement.

At the closing of the acquisition of Plaza we issued to San Juan Holdings warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.06 per shares. The warrants are exercisable until January 16, 2014. San Juan Holding has the same registration rights as are granted to Elizabeth Plaza with respect to the 1,150,000 shares of common stock issued to her pursuant to the merger agreement.

Broker-Dealer Warrants

At the closing of the reverse acquisition we issued to broker-dealers who assisted us in our January 2006 private placement, three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,439,892 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.7344 per shares. The holders of the warrants have piggyback registration rights for the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, which will include a standard underwriters’ right to exclude shares, commencing six months after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

Delaware Law Provisions

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law statute. Section 203 prohibits a publicly-held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. A “business combination” includes mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within the prior three years did own, 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock.

Our certificate of incorporation contains certain provisions permitted under Delaware General Corporation Law relating to the liability of directors. The provisions eliminate a director’s liability for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty, except in certain circumstances where such liability may not be eliminated under applicable law. Further, our certificate of incorporation contains provisions to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware General Corporation Law.

40

 
EXPERTS

The financial statements for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006, included in this prospectus to the extent and for the periods indicated in their reports, have been audited by Horwath Vélez & Co. PSC, independent registered public accountants, and are included herein in reliance upon the authority of such firms as experts in accounting and auditing in giving such reports.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of common stock offered through this prospectus will be passed on by Akerman Senterfitt.

HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarter and periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission using the Commission’s EDGAR system. You may inspect these documents and copy information from them at the Commission’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. The address of such site is http//www.sec.gov.

We have filed a registration statement with the Commission relating to the offering of the shares. The registration statement contains information which is not included in this prospectus. You may inspect or copy the registration statement at the Commission’s public reference facilities or its website.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any person to provide you with any information that is different.

41

 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
 
Page
Audited Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on October 31, 2007 financial statements - Horwath Vélez & Co., PSC
 
F-2
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2007
 
F-3
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006
 
F-4
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006
 
F-5
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006
 
F-7
 
 
 
Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements
 
F-8
 
 
 
Unaudited Financial Statements for the six months ended April 30, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30,, 2008
 
F-22
 
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Six-Month Periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007
 
F-23
 
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007
 
F-24
 
 
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Six-Month Period ended April 30, 2008
 
F-25
 
 
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the Six-Month Periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007
 
F-26
 
F-1

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc.
Dorado, Puerto Rico
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. as of October 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended October 31, 2007. Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc as of October 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended October 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
S/HORWATH VÉLEZ & CO, PSC
San Juan, Puerto Rico
 
January 28, 2008
Puerto Rico Society of Certified Public Accountants
Stamp number 2298338 was
Affixed to the original of this report+
 
F-2

 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheet
October 31, 2007
 
ASSETS:
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
4,792,366
 
Accounts receivable
   
3,559,279
 
Other
   
276,506
 
Total current assets
   
8,628,151
 
 
       
Property and equipment
   
799,851
 
Other assets, mainly intangible assets
   
134,686
 
Total Assets
 
$
9,562,688
 
 
       
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
       
Current liabilities
       
Current portion-obligations under capital leases
 
$
41,987
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
1,592,389
 
Due to affiliate - current
   
2,706,892
 
Income taxes payable
   
423,703
 
Total current liabilities
   
4,764,971
 
Due to affiliate
   
2,530,873
 
Other long-term liabilities
   
99,661
 
Total liabilities
   
7,395,505
 
         
Stockholders' equity:
       
Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; none outstanding
   
-
 
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 19,615,539 shares
   
1,961
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
115,404
 
Retained earnings
   
2,046,264
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
   
3,554
 
Total stockholders' equity
   
2,167,183
 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
 
$
9,562,688
 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
F-3

 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC. 
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Years Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006

 
 
Years ended October 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
2006
 
REVENUES
 
$
16,204,851
 
$
14,184,445
 
 
                    
COST OF REVENUES
   
9,380,916
   
8,116,207
 
 
             
GROSS PROFIT
   
6,823,935
   
6,068,238
 
 
               
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
   
3,176,140
   
2,225,714
 
 
   
 
   
  
 
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
   
3,647,795
   
3,842,524
 
 
   
         
   
     
 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
   
      
   
       
 
Interest expense
   
(392,171
)
 
(392,742
)
Interest income
   
107,505
   
49,050
 
Loss on disposition of property and equipment
   
(25,660
)
 
(3,664
)
         
   
(310,326
)
 
(347,356
)
 
             
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX
   
3,337,469
   
3,495,168
 
 
             
INCOME TAX
   
1,436,302
   
1,159,828
 
 
             
NET INCOME
 
$
1,901,167
 
$
2,335,340
 
 
             
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
$
0.10
 
$
0.22
 
 
             
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
$
0.09
 
$
0.13
 
 
             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC
   
19,391,063
   
10,508,938
 
 
             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED
   
22,166,182
   
17,880,265
 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
F-4

 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006

 
 
Years ended October 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
2006
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
 
 
Net income for the year
 
$
1,901,167
 
$
2,335,340
 
Loss on disposition of property and equipment
   
25,660
   
3,664
 
Stock-based compensation
   
115,404
   
-
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
208,225
   
194,977
 
Imputed interest expense
   
382,804
   
379,961
 
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
   
2,245,364
   
(870,275
)
Decrease (increase) in other assets
   
188,298
   
(468,084
)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
   
561,794
   
(17,725
)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
   
5,628,716
   
1,557,858
 
 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
             
Purchases of property and equipment
   
(322,512
)
 
(104,922
)
Cash acquired as part of the Pharma-PR acquisition
   
-
   
28,943
 
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
   
(322,512
)
 
(75,979
)
 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
             
Net proceeds from the sale of preferred stock      
   
-
   
10,000,000
 
Payment for purchase of Pharma-PR stock
   
-
   
(9,900,000
)
Payment for non-compete covenant
   
-
   
(100,000
)
Payments on capital lease obligations
   
(38,873
)
 
(35,459
)
Payments to affiliate
   
(2,750,000
)
 
(213,388
)
Distributions to stockholder
   
-
   
(749,554
)
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
   
(2,788,873
)
 
(998,401
)
 
             
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
   
2,517,331
   
483,478
 
 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
   
2,275,035
   
1,791,557
 
 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
 
$
4,792,366
 
$
2,275,035
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
F-5

 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - (Continued)
For the Years Ended October 31, 2007 and 2006

  
 
Years ended October 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
2006
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
  
 
  
 
Cash Paid for:
 
 
 
 
 
Income tax
 
$
1,134,301
 
$
1,038,126
 
Interest
 
$
513,076
 
$
12,781
 
 
   
   
 
SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   
   
 
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock
 
$
-
 
$
1,483
 
Conversion of cashless exercise warrants to shares of common stock
 
$
130
 
$
-
 
Application of down payment to acquisition price of property and equipment
 
$
-
 
$
37,655
 
Income tax withheld by clients but used as a credit in the income tax return of a stockholder (non-cash distribution)
 
$
-
 
$
84,561
 
Disposed partially depreciated property and equipment with accumulated depreciation of $68,962
 
$
94,962
 
$
-
 
Accounts payable incurred for project in process
 
$
246,502
 
$
-
 
Debt incurred in the acquisition of certain assets from another company
 
$
-
 
$
200,000
 
Debt payable to affiliate originated in the acquisition of Pharma-PR, net of $1,025,000 imputed interest
 
$
-
 
$
7,225,000
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
F-6

 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2007 AND 2006
 
   
Common Stock
 
Preferred Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
 
Retained
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
     
   
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Earnings
 
Income
 
Total
 
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 31, 2005 (PHARMA-PR -ONLY)
   
50,000
 
$
1,000
   
-
 
$
-
 
$
-
 
$
5,979,569
 
$
-
 
$
5,980,569
 
 
                     
 
                         
RECLASSIFICATION OF $0.02 COMMON STOCK
   
(50,000
)
 
(1,000
)
 
-
   
-
   
1,000
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
ISSUANCE OF $0.0001 COMMON STOCK IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION OF EQUITY
   
275,900
   
28
   
-
   
-
   
20,947
   
-
   
-
   
20,975
 
 
                     
 
                         
TWO-FOR-ONE SHARE DISTRIBUTION
   
275,900
   
28
   
-
   
   
(28
)
 
-
   
-
   
-
 
 
                       
 
                         
ISSUANCE OF $0.0001 COMMON STOCK
   
1,750,000
   
174
   
-
   
-
   
844,385
   
-
   
-
   
844,559
 
 
                     
 
                         
ISSUANCE OF $0.0001 PREFERRED STOCK
   
-
   
-
   
1,175,000
   
118
   
10,171,383
   
-
   
-
   
10,171,501
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
ISSUANCE OF STOCK WARRANTS TO PURCHASE 2,500,000  SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AT $0.06
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,686,000
   
(1,686,000
)
 
-
   
-
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
ISSUANCE OF STOCK WARRANTS TO PURCHASE 1,600,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AT $0.06
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
800
   
(800
)
 
-
   
-
 
 
                     
 
                         
CAPITAL PAYMENT
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(12,724,487
)
 
(5,647,284
)
 
-
   
(18,371,771
)
 
                     
 
                         
CONVERSION OF PREFERRED STOCK TO COMMON STOCK
   
15,998,800
   
1,600
   
(1,175,000
)
 
(118
)
 
-
   
(1,482
)
 
-
   
-
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
ADDITIONAL SHARES FROM CONVERSION OF PREFERRED STOCK TO COMMON STOCK
   
14,401
   
1
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(1
)
 
-
   
-
 
 
                     
 
                         
NET INCOME
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
2,335,340
   
-
   
2,335,340
 
  
                     
 
                         
DISTRIBUTIONS
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(834,115
)
 
-
   
(834,115
)
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 31, 2006 (CONSOLIDATED)
   
18,315,001
   
1,831
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
145,227
   
-
   
147,058
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
CASHLESS CONVERSION OF WARRANTS TO SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
   
1,300,538
   
130
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(130
)
 
-
   
-
 
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
 
 
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
115,404
   
-
   
-
   
115,404
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
NET INCOME
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
1,901,167
   
-
   
1,901,167
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
3,554
   
3,554
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
                        
 
                        
3,554
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
1,904,721
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 31, 2007 (CONSOLIDATED)
   
19,615,539
 
$
1,961
   
-
 
$
-
 
$
115,404
 
$
2,046,264
 
$
3,554
 
$
2,167,183
 
 
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 
 
F-7

 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2007 AND 2006
 
NOTE A - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (“Pharma-Bio”) is a Delaware corporation organized on January 14, 2004. Pharma-Bio is the parent company of Pharma-Bio Serv PR, Inc. (“Pharma-PR”), which was formerly Plaza Consulting Group, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation, and Pharma-Bio Serv Validation & Compliance Limited (“Pharma-IR”) an Irish corporation. Pharma-Bio, Pharma-PR and Pharma-IR are collectively referred to as the “Company.” The Company operates in Puerto Rico, the United States and soon in Ireland under the name of Pharma Serv and is engaged in providing technical compliance consulting services primarily to the pharmaceutical, chemical, medical device and biotechnology industries.
 
On January 25, 2006, Pharma-Bio acquired Pharma-PR in a transaction which is accounted for as a reverse acquisition. Although Pharma-Bio is the company that made the acquisition, for accounting purposes, Pharma-PR is treated as the acquiring company. As a result, the financial statements reflect the results of operations and cash flows of Pharma-PR prior to January 25, 2006 and the combined operations of Pharma-Bio and Pharma-PR from and after January 25, 2006.
 
Pharma-IR is a majority owned subsidiary, which was organized in Ireland in September 2007. As of October 31, 2007, this subsidiary was in development stage and incurred organization expenses of approximately $39,800. During 2008, it is management’s intention to change the current corporate structure of this majority own subsidiary but this is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s future operations or its financial position.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. 

REVERSE ACQUISITION
 
On January 25, 2006, pursuant to a plan and agreement of merger (the "Plaza Agreement") dated as of October 31, 2005, among Pharma-Bio, Plaza Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pharma-Bio ("Acquisition Company"), Pharma-PR and Elizabeth Plaza, the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR, Pharma-Bio acquired Pharma-PR. The acquisition was effected by the merger of Acquisition Company into Pharma-PR. Pursuant to the Plaza Agreement, Ms. Plaza, as the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR, received at the closing $10,000,000 plus 1,150,000 shares of Pharma-Bio's common stock. In addition, the Plaza Agreement provides for us to make three annual payments to Ms. Plaza, each in the amount of $2,750,000, payable on January 25, 2007, 2008 and 2009. See Note H with respect to payments made and obligations due to related parties.
 
At the closing, all of the present officers and directors of Pharma-Bio resigned from their respective positions, except that Mr. Dov Perlysky, who was president and a director of Pharma-Bio, resigned as an officer, but continued as a director. At the closing, Pharma-Bio elected four directors, including Ms. Plaza. The other three are independent directors.
 
Pharma-Bio raised the funds necessary to make the $10,000,000 payment due to Ms. Plaza through the private placement of units consisting of shares of a series A preferred stock and warrants to purchase 7,999,400 common stock. The series A preferred stock was automatically converted into 15,998,800 shares of common stock upon an increase in Pharma-Bio's authorized common stock. See Note C.
 
The acquisition of Pharma-PR and the private placement resulted in a change of control of Pharma-Bio. As a result of the reverse acquisition accounting treatment, Pharma-PR is deemed to be the acquiring company for accounting purposes. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition because former owners of Pharma-PR, together with the purchasers in the private placement who purchased the series A preferred stock and warrants in connection with the acquisition of Pharma-PR, gained control of Pharma-Bio. Effective on the acquisition date, Pharma-Bio's balance sheet includes the assets and liabilities of Pharma-PR and its equity accounts have been recapitalized to reflect the equity of Pharma-Bio.
 
F-8

 
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments (excluding obligations under capital leases and amounts due to affiliate): cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, are considered reasonable estimates of fair value due to the short-term nature. Management believes, based on current rates, that the fair value of its obligations under capital leases and amounts due to affiliate approximates the carrying amount.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Revenue is primarily derived from: (1) time and materials contracts (representing approximately 90% of total revenues), which is recognized by applying the proportional performance model, whereby revenue is recognized as performance occurs, and (2) short-term fixed-fee contracts or "not to exceed" contracts (approximately 10% of total revenues), which revenue is recognized similarly, except that certain milestones also have to be reached before revenue is recognized. If the Company determines that a fixed-fee or “not to exceed” contract will result in a loss, the Company recognizes the estimated loss in the period in which such determination is made.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are recorded at their estimated realizable value. Accounts are deemed past due when payment has not been received within the stated time period. The Company's policy is to review individual past due amounts periodically and write off amounts for which all collection efforts are deemed to have been exhausted. Due to the nature of the Company’s customers, bad debts are accounted for using the direct write-off method whereby an expense is recognized only when a specific account is determined to be uncollectible. The effect of using this method approximates that of the allowance method.
 
F-9

 
Income Taxes
 
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires an asset and liability approach method of accounting for income taxes. This method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements. The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Pharma-PR, from its inception until January 24, 2006, was covered under the provisions of Subchapter N of Subtitle A of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code (the "Puerto Rico Code"), which is similar to Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code in that its taxable income is taxed to the stockholders and therefore there is no income tax liability for that period. As a result of the completion of the reverse acquisition, Pharma-PR and Pharma-Bio are no longer eligible for treatment as a Subchapter N corporation. See Note G.
 
Although Ms. Plaza was responsible for the taxes on the Pharma-PR's taxable income for the period from December 1, 2005 to January 24, 2006, pursuant to the Plaza Agreement, the Company agreed to reimburse Ms. Plaza for the income taxes applicable to said taxable income. The reimbursement amounts to $125,227 and was paid on June 15, 2006.
 
Property and equipment
 
Owned property and equipment, and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Equipment and vehicles under capital leases are stated at the lower of fair market value or net present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the leases.
 
Depreciation of owned assets, and amortization of assets under capital leases and leasehold improvements, are provided using the straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or lease term. Major renewals and betterments that extend the life of the assets are capitalized, while expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred.
 
The Company evaluates for impairment its long-lived assets to be held and used, and long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
 
Intangible assets
 
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as customer lists and covenants not to compete, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
 
Stock-based Compensation
 
Effective November 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) using the modified prospective method, which results in the provisions of SFAS 123R being applied to the consolidated financial statements on a prospective basis. Under the modified prospective recognition method, restatement of consolidated income from prior periods is not required, and accordingly, the Company has not provided such restatements. Under the modified prospective provisions of SFAS 123R, compensation expense is recorded for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that were outstanding on November 1, 2006 and all subsequent awards. SFAS 123R requires that all stock-based compensation expense be recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of awards that will be forfeited. The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at grant date. SFAS 123R also amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”, to require that excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation be reflected as cash flows from financing activities rather than cash flows from operating activities. The Company does not recognize such cash flow from financing activities since there has been no tax benefit related to the stock-based compensation.
 
F-10

 
Income Per Share of Common Stock
 
Basic income per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted income per share includes the dilution of common stock equivalents. Pursuant to reverse acquisition accounting treatment, for the year ended October 31, 2006, the weighted average number of shares outstanding in the computation of basic income per share was derived by weighting (i) for the period prior to the reverse acquisition transaction, the number of shares outstanding represented the 1,150,000 shares received by the former stockholder of Pharma-PR and the shares 600,000 shares received by San Juan Holdings, Inc., and (ii) for the period after the transaction, the number of shares outstanding represented the shares of Pharma-Bio that are outstanding. Diluted income per share includes the dilution of common equivalents. Accordingly, the series A preferred stock was deemed outstanding from the date of issuance until April 25, 2006, when the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware and the shares of series A preferred stock were automatically converted into common stock. The warrants were deemed to be outstanding from the date of issuance to the end of the reporting period, except for stock warrants issued to the investment banker for Pharma-PR as a result of the reverse acquisition, which were deemed to be outstanding through all periods prior to the reverse acquisition.
 
The weighted average shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted) were calculated using the treasury stock method for the respective periods.

Foreign Operations

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is its local currency. The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation effect for subsidiaries using a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar is included as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income.

The Company’s intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables that the Company considers to be of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income, while gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from those international subsidiaries for which the Company anticipates settlement in the foreseeable future are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The net gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statements of operations were not significant for the periods presented.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the October 31, 2006 consolidated financial statements to conform to the October 31, 2007 consolidated financial statements presentation. Such reclassifications do not have an effect on net earnings as previously reported.
 
F-11

 
NOTE B - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

1. In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This Statement applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited.

Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

2. In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASB’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”.
 
Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

3. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 157 “Fair Value Measurement”. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this Statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The provisions of this Statement should be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this Statement is initially applied, except for certain exceptions stated in the Statement.
 
The implementation of this Statement will have no significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
4. In June 2006, The FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Earlier application of the provisions of this Interpretation is encouraged if the enterprise has not yet issued financial statements, including interim financial statements, in the period this Interpretation is adopted. Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any effect on the Company's results of operations or its financial condition.

5. Other recently issued FASB Statements or Interpretations, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins, and AICPA Emerging Issue Task Force Consensuses have either been implemented or are not applicable to the Company.
 
F-12

 
NOTE C - CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS

On January 24, 2006, Pharma-Bio effected a two-for-one share distribution with respect to its common stock pursuant to which Pharma-Bio issued one share of common stock for each share outstanding on the record date, January 24, 2006. All share and per share information in these financial statements give retroactive effect to this share distribution.
 
On January 25, 2006, contemporaneously with the consummation of the acquisition, Pharma-Bio sold, in a private placement, 47 units, each unit consisting of 25,000 shares of series A preferred stock, warrants to purchase 85,100 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share and warrants to purchase 85,100 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share. In the private placement, Pharma-Bio issued an aggregate of 1,175,000 shares of series A preferred stock (which were convertible into an aggregate of 15,998,800 shares of common stock), warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share, and warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share, to 42 accredited investors. Pharma-Bio paid brokerage commissions of 10% of the gross purchase price and an aggregate non-accountable expense allowance of 3% of the gross purchase price with respect to the units sold. In certain cases, the broker waived the commission and non-accountable expense allowance, and the investor paid the purchase price less the commission and non-accountable expense allowance. The purchase price for the 47 units sold was $11,750,000. Broker-dealers waived commission and non-accountable expense allowance with respect to $628,750, Pharma-Bio paid commissions and non-accountable expense allowances totaling $898,750, and Pharma-Bio issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,439,892 shares of common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.7344 per share and a term of three years. As of October 31, 2007, the warrants disclosed herein were still outstanding.
 
Each share of series A preferred stock was automatically converted into 13.616 shares of common stock, or an aggregate of 15,998,800 shares of common stock upon the filing on April 25, 2006, of a restated certificate of incorporation which increased the authorized capital stock to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 50,000,000 shares of common stock.
 
The subscription agreement pursuant to which the series A preferred stock and warrants were issued required Pharma-Bio to file a registration statement within 60 days after the effective date of the merger between Pharma-PR and Plaza Acquisition Corp. The effective date of the merger was January 25, 2006, therefore, the 60-day term expired on March 26, 2006. Since Pharma-Bio failed to file the registration statement by that date, Pharma-Bio was required to issue .0003 shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued upon conversion of the series A preferred stock for each day of delay. Pharma-Bio was three days late, therefore, 14,401 shares of common stock were issued to the former holders of the series A preferred stock.
 
The warrants issued in the private placement expire five years from the closing date and are callable by Pharma-Bio if the closing price of the common stock is at least twice the exercise price of the warrants for twenty consecutive trading days.
 
In January 2004, Pharma-Bio issued warrants to purchase 1,600,000 shares at $0.06 per share. The warrants may also be converted into shares of common stock on a cashless basis under certain conditions, but on a reduced number of shares. The warrants expire on January 16, 2014. In January 2007, warrants to purchase a total of 1,350,400 shares of common stock were converted to 1,300,538 shares of common stock pursuant to the cashless exercise provisions. As of October 31, 2007, warrants to purchase 249,600 shares remain outstanding.
 
F-13

 
NOTE D - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
The balance of property and equipment at October 31, 2007 consists of:
 
 
 
Useful life
(years)
 
Amount
 
Vehicles under capital leases
   
5
 
$
221,434
 
Leasehold improvements
   
5
   
19,279
 
Computers
   
3
   
185,491
 
Equipment
   
3-5
   
119,672
 
Furniture and fixtures
   
10
   
68,509
 
Projects in progress
   
-
   
508,399
 
Total
   
    
   
1,122,784
 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
   
    
   
(322,933
)
Property and equipment, net
   
    
 
$
799,851
 
 
NOTE E - OTHER ASSETS
 
At October 31, 2007, non-current other assets include the following:

Intangible assets:
 
 
 
Covenant not to compete, net of accumulated amortization of $38,333
 
$
61,667
 
Customer-related intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $91,667
   
58,333
 
Other assets
   
14,686
 
 
 
$
134,686
 
 
Covenant not to compete represents the portion of the payment made in connection with the purchase of the Pharma-PR stock that was allocated to a non-competition covenant. Under this agreement, the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR agreed not to compete with the Company for a period of five years. This amount is amortized on the straight-line method over the five-year term of the non-competition covenant.
 
Customer-related intangible assets consist mainly of a customer list which Pharma-PR acquired along with other assets from a business which performs in the United States consulting services similar to those performed by the Company in Puerto Rico. The value of the customer list is being amortized on the straight-line method over its estimated useful life of three years.
 
The amortization expense for the years ended on October 31, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $70,000 and $60,000, respectively.

NOTE F - LINE-OF-CREDIT

The Company has available an unsecured line-of-credit with a financial institution, which provides for borrowings up to $250,000. This line of credit is used as working capital whenever the Company’s bank account cannot meet its daily cash requirements. Interest on advances obtained from this line-of-credit will be paid at 2% over the bank’s prevailing prime rate. During the year ended October 31, 2007 the line-of-credit was not used.
 
F-14

 
NOTE G - INCOME TAXES
 
As substantially all operations are being carried by the Puerto Rico subsidiary, the Company's taxable income is subject to the Puerto Rico income to a maximum of a 39% rate provided by the 1994 Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as amended. However, on August 1, 2005, Puerto Rico Act No. 41 was approved, which imposes an additional 2.5% special tax to all corporations and partnerships having a net taxable income over $20,000. The Act was effective for taxable years commencing after December 31, 2004 and ending on or before December 31, 2006; however, on November 10, 2006, Puerto Rico Act No. 244 was approved to impose the additional 2.5% special tax to taxable years commencing after December 31, 2004 and before January 1, 2007. Therefore, the Company's maximum effective tax rate was 41.5% for its fiscal years ending on October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, and thereafter will be 39%.
 
The operations carried out in the United States by the Company’s subsidiary are taxed in the United States. With certain limitations, the Company receives a credit on its Puerto Rico tax for the federal income tax paid. Also, upon distribution of earnings by the Puerto Rican subsidiary to its parent those dividends are taxed at the federal level, however, the parent is able to receive a credit for the taxes paid by the subsidiary on its operations in Puerto Rico, to the extent of the federal taxes that result from those earnings (determined at rates which are normally lower than in Puerto Rico). As a result, the income tax expense of the Company, under its present corporate structure, would normally be the Puerto Rico taxes on operations in Puerto Rico, plus 10% withholding in Puerto Rico from dividends paid to the Puerto Rican subsidiary’s parent, plus federal taxes on operations in the United States.

As of October 31, 2007 the Company has not recognized deferred income taxes on $2,099,583 of undistributed earnings of its Puerto Rican subsidiary, since such earnings are considered to be reinvested indefinitely. If the earnings were distributed in the form of dividends, the Company would be subject to a $209,958 tollgate tax.

The income tax expense is computed at statutory rates applied to income calculated in accordance with the accounting practices described herein and as shown in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.
 
The reasons for the difference between the provision for income tax applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico were as follows:
 
  
 
Years ended October 31,
 
 
 
2007
 
2006
 
Theoretical income tax expense by application of statutory rates to the book pre-tax income
 
$
1,401,569
 
$
1,450,495
 
Permanent Differences:
   
  
   
  
 
 
   
  
   
   
 
Effect of income subject to taxation under Subchapter N (taxable income taxed to stockholders)
   
  
   
(358,037
)
 
   
  
   
  
 
Other permanent differences
   
34,733
   
67,370
 
 
   
   
 
Income tax expense
 
$
1,436,302
 
$
1,159,828
 
 
Because Pharma-PR was treated as an N Corporation under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code through January 24, 2006, its income was taxed to its stockholder during that period, and Pharma-PR did not pay income tax. Had income tax been paid at the statutory rate, Pharma-PR’s net income would have been $1,977,303, or $0.19 per share (basic) and $0.11 per share (diluted), for the year ended October 31, 2006.
 
F-15

 
NOTE H - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS; DUE TO AFFILIATE

On January 25, 2006, pursuant to the Plaza Agreement, Elizabeth Plaza, as the sole stockholder of Pharma-PR and affiliate of Pharma-PR, received at the closing $10,000,000 plus 1,150,000 shares of Pharma-Bio's common stock. In addition, the Company agreed to pay Ms. Plaza three payments of $2,750,000, including imputed interest determined in accordance with Section 1274 of the Internal Revenue Code, on January 25, 2007, 2008, and 2009. In January 2007, Elizabeth Plaza agreed to accept the first installment of $2,750,000 in two payments, one of $2,500,000 in January 2007 and the second of $250,000 in February 2007. The October 31, 2007 outstanding payments are due as follows:

Twelve months ending October 31,
2008
 
$
2,750,000
 
2009
   
2,750,000
 
Total payments
   
5,500,000
 
Less: imputed interest  
   
(262,235
)
Present value of minimum payments
   
5,237,765
 
Current portion
   
(2,706,892
)
Long-term portion
 
$
2,530,873
 
 
As a condition to closing, Pharma-PR was required to have a net tangible book value of not less than $5,500,000, of which at least $2,000,000 was in cash, as of November 30, 2005. Subject to the requirement that Plaza have at least $2,000,000 in cash as of November 30, 2005, the purchase price was to be adjusted upward or downward depending on the net tangible book value, determined as provided in the Plaza Agreement. This provision resulted in an additional payment to Ms. Plaza in the amount of $88,161, which was paid during the third quarter of 2006.
 
The Plaza Agreement also provides that Pharma-PR, rather than Ms. Plaza, is responsible for the income tax from December 1, 2005 through the closing date, which was January 25, 2006. Because of the status of Plaza as an N Corporation under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, Pharma-PR's net income from December 1, 2005 to January 24, 2006 was taxed to Ms. Plaza. The income tax payable by Ms. Plaza for Pharma-PR's taxable income for that period amounted to $125,227. Pharma-PR reimbursed Ms. Plaza the $125,227 during the third quarter of 2006. The $88,161 payment described in the preceding paragraph and the $125,227 payment described in this paragraph are treated as additional payments on account of the purchase price of Pharma-PR stock from Mrs. Plaza.
 
Pursuant to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, the Company's clients are required to withhold a percentage of its fees (usually 3%, but sometimes 7%) as withheld income tax and remit such amount to the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury. Such payment is treated as a payment on account to the Company's income tax obligations. Prior to January 25, 2006, Pharma-PR was an N Corporation, and the Company's taxable income was taxed to Ms. Plaza, as sole stockholder. Accordingly, such withheld taxes were treated as a distribution to Ms. Plaza, as the Company's sole stockholder since Ms. Plaza was the person entitled to take the credit for the income tax withheld by the Company's clients in her personal income tax return. The amounts withheld prior to January 25, 2006 are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as non-cash distributions.
 
San Juan Holdings represented Pharma-PR and Elizabeth Plaza in connection with the reverse acquisition. For such services, Pharma-Bio issued 600,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.06 per share, to San Juan Holdings. In Pharma-Bio's private placement of series A preferred stock and warrants, San Juan Holdings purchased three units. The purchase price for the three units was $750,000. The broker, which is an affiliate of San Juan Holdings, waived the commission and non-accountable expense allowance with respect to such sales, and as a result, San Juan Holdings purchased the three units for a net payment of $652,500. Pharma-Bio also paid an affiliate of San Juan Holdings a broker's commission and non-accountable expense allowance of $195,000 for sales made to other purchasers in the private placement, and Pharma-Bio issued to the affiliate three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 275,724 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.7344 per share. As of October 31, 2007, warrants to purchase the 2,500,000 shares remained outstanding.
 
F-16

 
NOTE I - COMMITMENTS
 
1. Contracts
 
On January 25, 2006, the Company entered into employment agreements with Elizabeth Plaza and Nelida Plaza. The agreement with Elizabeth Plaza, as extended to December 31, 2008 provides that Ms. Plaza will serve as president and chief executive officer of the Company, for which she will receive a salary at the annual rate of $250,000. The Company will also provide Ms. Plaza with an automobile allowance at the annual rate of $24,828, discretionary bonuses and stock options or other equity-based incentives as shall be determined by the compensation committee's board of directors, except that her bonus shall not be less than 4% nor more than 50% of her salary. If the Company terminates Ms. Plaza's employment other than for cause or as a result of her death or disability, the Company is required to pay Ms. Plaza the balance of her compensation for her employment terms and her consulting term and other benefits, including a pro rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to her, and her obligations under her non-competition provision terminate. Upon termination of the agreement Ms. Plaza will serve as a consultant under terms to be negotiated.
 
The Company's agreement with Nelida Plaza provides that Ms. Plaza will serve as vice president for a term of three years for which she will receive annual compensation at the annual rate of $150,000. She is also entitled to such bonus compensation as is determined by the compensation committee, not to exceed 50% of her salary. The Company also agreed to make the lease payments on the automobile she currently leases. Such payments are at the annual rate of approximately $11,600. If the Company terminates Ms. Plaza's employment other than for cause or as a result of her death or disability, the Company is required to pay Ms. Plaza the balance of her compensation for her employment terms and her consulting term and other benefits, including a pro rata portion of the bonus that would have been paid to her, and her obligations under her non-competition provision, terminate. 

2. Lease commitments
 
Capitalized lease obligations - As of October 31, 2007, the Company leases vehicles under non-cancelable capital leases with a cost of $221,434 (accumulated depreciation of $111,147). Amortization expense for these assets amounted to $44,286 and $44,805 in the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The following is a schedule, by year, of future minimum lease payments under the capitalized leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments at October 31, 2007:


Twelve months ending October 31,
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
2008
 
$
48,240
 
2009
   
71,240
 
2010
   
32,239
 
Total future minimum lease payments
   
151,719
 
Less: Amount of imputed interest
   
( 10,071
)
Present value of future minimum lease payments
   
141,648
 
Current portion of obligation under capital leases
   
(41,987
)
Long-term portion
 
$
99,661
 
 
F-17

 
Operating facilities - The Company conducts its administrative operations in office facilities which are leased under three different rental agreements with the following terms:
 
Description
 
Monthly Rent
 
Commitment Term
Headquarter offices and laboratory testing facilities
 
$
18,750
 
Ending in January 2012, with one five year renewal option
Cork office facilities 
 
 750
 
Month-to-month 
Limerick office space
 
$
1,050
 
Ending in July 2010

The first lease listed in the table is with an affiliate of the chief executive officer. In February 2007, the Company and the affiliate rescinded a former lease agreement and entered into a new agreement for the new headquarters and laboratory testing facilities. The monthly payments under the new lease agreement, which amount to $18,750, will increase by 5% annually. The new agreement also requires the payment of utilities, property taxes, insurance and a portion of expenses incurred by the affiliate in connection with the maintenance of common areas. The Company paid a monthly rental of $3,200 for its former office facilities.

In June 2006, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office facilities in Limerick, Pennsylvania, at a monthly rental of $1,000. The original lease term expired on July 31, 2007; however, the lease agreement was renewed for an additional term of three years at monthly rental of $1,050 during the first year, $1,100 during the second year, and $1,150 during the third year of the lease renewal term.

Minimum future rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of October 31, 2007 are:
 
  
 
Amount
 
2008
 
$
246,188
 
2009
   
258,459
 
2010
   
267,715
 
2011
   
270,233
 
2012
   
68,372
 
Total minimum lease payments
 
$
1,110,967
 

The Company leases certain apartments as dwellings for employees. The leases are under short-term lease agreements and usually are cancelable upon 30-day notification. Rent expense during the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 was $251,231 and $98,936, respectively.

NOTE J - STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
 
In October 2005, the Company's board of directors adopted, and on April 25, 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved, the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, covering 2,500,000 shares of common stock. The 2005 plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified options, stock grants, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based incentives to employees, including officers, and consultants. The 2005 plan is to be administered by a committee of independent directors. In the absence of a committee, the plan is administered by the board of directors. Independent directors are not eligible for discretionary options. However, each newly elected independent director receives at the time of his or her election, a five-year option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at the market price on the date of his or her election. In addition, the plan provides for the annual grant of an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock on the first trading day of January of each year, commencing January 2007. The options to directors have a term of five years and become exercisable cumulatively as to 50% of the shares subject to the option six months from the date of grant and, as to the remaining 50%, 18 months from the date of grant. Pursuant to this provision, on January 25, 2006, options to purchase 25,000 shares at $0.7344 per share, being the fair market value on the date of grant, were automatically granted to each of the three independent directors. Options intended to be incentive stock options must be granted at an exercise price per share which is not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and may have a term which is not longer than ten years. If the option holder holds at least 10% of our common stock, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant and the term of the option cannot exceed five years.
 
F-18


Pursuant to the Plaza Agreement, all outstanding options issued by Pharma-PR were terminated, and the Company granted incentive stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,400,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.7344 per share to the holders of such terminated Pharma-PR options pursuant to the Company's 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Of the total options to purchase 1,400,000 shares of common stock, options to purchase 776,186 shares of common stock were granted to 18 employees whose options to purchase Pharma-PR common stock were cancelled. The options to purchase the remaining 623,814 shares of common stock were granted to both the 18 former holders of Pharma-PR options and 23 additional Pharma-PR employees. The Company subsequently granted options to purchase other 473,724 shares to employees and independent directors. The new options have an exercise price of $0.7344, a term of five years and are exercisable in installments. As of October 31, 2006, there were approximately 1,348,090 outstanding options, since some options expired because of certain employment terminations.
 
As of November 1, 2006 there were outstanding options to acquire 1,348,090 shares of common stock, of which options, with a weighted-average exercise price of $0.7344, to acquire 228,320 shares terminated unexercised. In January 2007, the Company granted options to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock to each of its three independent directors and an option to purchase 50,000 shares to its new general manager. In February 2007, the Company also granted an option to purchase 35,000 shares to an independent contractor, of which an option to purchase 14,585 shares subsequently became vested and the option to purchase the remaining 20,414 shares was forfeited. No options were exercised or expired during the year ended October 31, 2007. As of October 31, 2007, there were outstanding options to purchase 1,199,355 shares. The weighted average of the remaining contractual life of the outstanding stock options is 3 years and the weighted average exercise price is $0.7496.

As of October 31, 2007 there were 75,000 vested stock options with a weighted average value and exercise price of $0.60 and $0.7344, respectively. The remaining contractual term for these vested stock options is 3 years.

The following table presents the stock-based compensation included in the Company’s consolidated statement of income and the effect on earnings per share for the year ended October 31, 2007:

Stock-based compensation expense:
 
 
 
Cost of services
 
$
60,990
 
Selling, general and administrative
   
54,414
 
Stock-based compensation before tax
   
115,404
 
Income tax benefit
   
 
Net stock-based compensation expense
 
$
115,404
 
 
   
 
Effect on earnings per share:
   
 
Basic earnings per share
 
$
(0.006
)
Diluted earnings per share
 
$
(0.005
)
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R and SAB 107, the Company followed APB 25, and compensation cost related to employee stock options was generally not recognized because options were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the fair market value at the date of grant. Had compensation cost for the stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards for the year ended October 31, 2006, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, the effect on Company’s net income and earnings per share would not have been significant.

The fair value of each stock option granted prior to November 1, 2006 was estimated at $0.60. For purposes of valuing the options, since there was no public market for the common stock, the underlying common stock was valued at $0.7344, which is the price paid by the private placement investors in January 2006, which was the most recent sale of securities by the Company.
 
F-19


The fair value of each stock option granted on or after November 1, 2006 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions (expected volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price):

Expected dividend yield
   
0.0
%
Expected stock price volatility
   
10
%
Risk free interest rate
   
4.7
%
Expected life of options
   
2.65 years
 
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted during the year ended October 31, 2007
 
$
0.1506
 

Pursuant to the Plaza Agreement, Pharma-Bio agreed that it would issue 100 shares of common stock to each of Pharma-PR's eligible employees. Such shares will not be issued until Pharma-Bio is eligible to use a Form S-8 registration statement in connection with the issuance of such shares. Approximately 16,500 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to this program.
 
On December 20, 2007, subsequent to our fiscal year end herein reported, in accordance with the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company awarded 240,000 stock options to certain employees and executives. See Note M.

NOTE K - CONCENTRATION OF RISKS
 
Cash and cash equivalents

The Company maintains our cash deposits in a FDIC insured bank and in a money market obligations trust registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The deposit balances frequently exceed federally insured limits; however, no losses have been experienced on these accounts.
 
Accounts receivable and revenues

Management deems all its accounts receivables to be fully collectible, and, as such, does not maintain any allowances for uncollectible receivables.
 
The Company's revenues, and the related receivables, are concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry in Puerto Rico and United States of America. Although few customers represent a significant source of revenue, our functions are not a continuous process, accordingly, the client base for which our services are typically rendered, on a project-by-project basis, changes regularly.

The Company provides a substantial portion of its services to various customers, which account 10% or more of our revenues. During one or both years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006, revenues over 10% for services provided to these customers represent 67% and 73% of total revenues, respectively. Individually, these customers represent total revenues of 23%, 22%, 10%, 7% and 5% in 2007; and 30%, 12%, 0%, 21% and 10% in 2006, respectively. At October 31, 2007 amounts due from these customers represent 29% of total accounts receivable balance.

Subsequent to October 31, 2007 one of the major customers, which represented 23% of the Company’s 2007 revenues, announced its plans to close its Puerto Rico operations during 2008. As of October 31, 2007, the outstanding balance of this customer represented 5% of total accounts receivable. Management considers the amount to be fully collectible. Although past performance is no indication of future performance, in the past, in the ordinary course of business, the Company has been successful substituting customer losses by adding new customers or projects to its base.
 
F-20

 
NOTE L - RETIREMENT PLAN
 
Pharma-PR has a qualified profit sharing plan in accordance with the provision of Section l165(a)(3)(A) of the Puerto Rico Code, for employees who meet certain age and service period requirements. The Company makes contributions to this plan as required by the provisions of the plan document. Contributions for the years ended October 31, 2007 and 2006 were $69,595 and $40,439, respectively.
   
NOTE M - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On December 20, 2007, in accordance with the Company’s 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee granted a total of 240,000 stock option awards to employees and executives.
 
F-21


PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)
April 30, 2008 

ASSETS:
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
2,359,668
 
Accounts receivable
   
3,234,395
 
Other
   
173,564
 
Total current assets
   
5,767,627
 
 
   
 
Property and equipment
   
1,550,670
 
Other assets, mainly intangible assets
   
96,586
 
Total assets
 
$
7,414,883
 
 
   
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
   
 
Current liabilities
   
 
Current portion-obligations under capital leases
 
$
49,377
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
1,220,811
 
Due to affiliate
   
2,616,930
 
Income taxes payable
   
566,580
 
Total current liabilities
   
4,453,698
 
Long-term liabilities
   
103,984
 
Total liabilities
   
4,557,682
 
 
   
 
Stockholders' equity:
   
 
Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; none outstanding
   
-
 
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 19,615,539 shares
   
1,961
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
190,422
 
Retained earnings
   
2,674,171
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   
(9,353
)
Total stockholders' equity
   
2,857,201
 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
7,414,883
 
 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
F-22


PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
For the Six-Month Periods Ended April 30,, 2008 and 2007

 
 
Six months ended April 30,
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
REVENUES
 
$
7,302,096
 
$
7,755,138
 
 
             
COST OF REVENUES
   
4,581,876
   
4,595,451
 
 
             
GROSS PROFIT
   
2,720,220
   
3,159,687
 
 
             
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
   
1,501,924
   
1,474,550
 
 
   
   
 
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
   
1,218,296
   
1,685,137
 
 
   
   
 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
   
   
 
Interest expense
   
(133,318
)
 
(213,802
)
Interest income
   
57,872
   
43,754
 
Loss on disposition of property and equipment
   
-
   
(25,661
)
 
   
(75,446
)
 
(195,709
)
 
             
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
   
1,142,850
   
1,489,428
 
 
             
INCOME TAXES
   
514,943
   
641,700
 
 
             
NET INCOME
 
$
627,907
 
$
847,728
 
 
   
   
 
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
$
0.03
 
$
0.04
 
 
             
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
 
$
0.03
 
$
0.04
 
 
             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING – BASIC
   
19,615,539
   
19,162,866
 
 
             
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING – DILUTED
   
22,114,006
   
21,897,862
 
 
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
F-23


PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Six-Month Periods Ended April 30, 2008 and 2007

 
 
Six months ended April 30,
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
Net income
 
$
627,907
 
$
847,728
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
   
   
 
Loss on disposition of property and equipment
   
-
   
25,661
 
Stock-based compensation
   
75,018
   
65,374
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
103,699
   
107,657
 
Imputed interest expense
   
129,166
   
208,729
 
Decrease in accounts receivable
   
326,314
   
1,784,616
 
Decrease in other assets
   
96,784
   
249,536
 
(Decrease) increase in liabilities
   
(395,346
)
 
532,323
 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
   
963,541
   
3,821,624
 
 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
             
Acquisition of property and equipment
   
(624,257
)
 
(18,080
)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
   
(624,257
)
 
(18,080
)
 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
             
Payments on obligations under capital lease
   
(21,982
)
 
(19,048
)
Payments to affiliate
   
(2,750,000
)
 
(2,750,000
)
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
   
(2,771,982
)
 
(2,769,048
)
 
             
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
   
(2,432,698
)
 
1,034,496
 
 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
   
4,792,366
   
2,275,035
 
 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
 
$
2,359,668
 
$
3,309,531
 
 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
   
   
 
Cash paid during the period for:
             
Income taxes
 
$
372,067
 
$
150,000
 
Interest
 
$
349,285
 
$
508,781
 
 
             
SUPPLEMENTARY SCHEDULES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   
   
 
Accounts payable incurred in projects in process
 
$
161,518
 
$
-
 
Income tax withheld by clients to be used as a credit in the Company’s income tax return
 
$
-
 
$
53,573
 
Obligation under capital lease incurred for the acquisition of a vehicle
 
$
33,695
 
$
-
 
Conversion of cashless exercise warrants to shares of common stock
 
$
-
 
$
130
 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-24


PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)
For the Six-Month Period Ended April 30, 2008

 
 
 
 
 
 
Additional
 
 
 
Accumulated Other
 
 
 
 
 
Common Stock
 
Preferred Stock
 
Paid-in
 
Retained
 
Comprehensive
 
 
 
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Capital
 
Earnings
 
Income (Loss)
 
Total
 
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 31, 2007
   
19,615,539
 
$
1,961
   
-
 
$
-
 
$
115,404
 
$
2,046,264
 
$
3,554
 
$
2,167,183
 
 
                                                 
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
75,018
   
-
   
-
   
75,018
 
 
     
 
   
 
   
   
 
   
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
NET INCOME
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
627,907
   
-
   
627,907
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
-
   
(12,907
)
 
(12,907
)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
                                             
(12,907
)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
615,000
 
 
                                                 
BALANCE AT APRIL 30, 2008
   
19,615,539
 
$
1,961
   
-
 
$
-
 
$
190,422
 
$
2,674,171
 
$
(9,353
)
$
2,857,201
 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-25


PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
For the Six-Month Periods Ended April 30, 2008 and 2007

NOTE A - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ORGANIZATION

Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. (“Pharma-Bio”) is a Delaware corporation organized on January 14, 2004. Pharma-Bio is the parent company of Pharma-Bio Serv PR, Inc. (“Pharma-PR”), a Puerto Rico corporation, and Pharma-Bio Serv Validation & Compliance Limited (“Pharma-IR”), a majority owned Irish corporation. Pharma-Bio, Pharma-PR and Pharma-IR are collectively referred to as the “Company.” The Company operates in Puerto Rico, the United States and in Ireland under the name of Pharma-Bio Serv and is engaged in providing technical compliance consulting services primarily to the pharmaceutical, chemical, medical device and biotechnology industries.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the six-month periods ended on April 30, 2008 and 2007 presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Regulation S-B pertaining to interim financial statements and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals which, in the opinion of management, are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. 

Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying value of the Company's financial instruments (excluding obligations under capital leases and amounts due to affiliate): cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, are considered reasonable estimates of fair value due to their short-term nature. Management believes, based on current rates, that the fair value of its obligations under capital leases and amounts due to affiliate approximates the carrying amount.
 
F-26


Revenue Recognition
 
Revenue is primarily derived from: (1) time and materials contracts (representing approximately 90% of total revenues), which is recognized by applying the proportional performance model, whereby revenue is recognized as performance occurs, and (2) short-term fixed-fee contracts or "not to exceed" contracts (approximately 10% of total revenues), which revenue is recognized similarly, except that certain milestones also have to be reached before revenue is recognized. If the Company determines that a fixed-fee or “not to exceed” contract will result in a loss, the Company recognizes the estimated loss in the period in which such determination is made.
 
Cash Equivalents
 
For purposes of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include investments in a money market obligations trust that is registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable
 
Accounts receivable are recorded at their estimated realizable value. Accounts are deemed past due when payment has not been received within the stated time period. The Company's policy is to review individual past due amounts periodically and write off amounts for which all collection efforts are deemed to have been exhausted. Due to the nature of the Company’s customers, bad debts are accounted for using the direct write-off method whereby an expense is recognized only when a specific account is determined to be uncollectible. The effect of using this method approximates that of the allowance method.

Income Taxes
 
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires an asset and liability approach method of accounting for income taxes. This method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements. The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Property and equipment
 
Owned property and equipment, and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Equipment and vehicles under capital leases are stated at the lower of fair market value or net present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the leases.
 
Depreciation and amortization of owned assets are provided for, when placed in service, in amount sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives, using straight-line basis. Assets under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized, over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or lease term. Major renewals and betterments that extend the life of the assets are capitalized, while expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed when incurred.
 
The Company evaluates for impairment its long-lived assets to be held and used, and long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Based on management estimates, no impairment of the operating properties was present.

Intangible assets

Definite-lived intangible assets, such as customer lists and covenants not to compete, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets. 
 
F-27

 
Stock-based Compensation
 
Effective November 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) using the modified prospective method, which results in the provisions of SFAS 123R being applied to the consolidated financial statements on a prospective basis. Under the modified prospective recognition method, restatement of consolidated income from prior periods is not required, and accordingly, the Company has not provided such restatements. Under the modified prospective provisions of SFAS 123R, compensation expense is recorded for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that were outstanding on November 1, 2006 and all subsequent awards. SFAS 123R requires that all stock-based compensation expense be recognized in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of awards that will be forfeited. The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at grant date. SFAS 123R also amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”, to require that excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation be reflected as cash flows from financing activities rather than cash flows from operating activities. The Company does not recognize such cash flow from financing activities since there has been no tax benefit related to the stock-based compensation.

Income Per Share of Common Stock
 
Basic income per share of common stock is calculated dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted income per share includes the dilution of common stock equivalents.
 
The diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding were calculated using the treasury stock method for the respective periods.

Foreign Operations

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is its local currency. The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation effect for subsidiaries using a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar is included as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income.

The Company’s intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables that the Company considers to be of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income, while gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from those international subsidiaries for which the Company anticipates settlement in the foreseeable future are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The net gains and losses recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income were not significant for the periods presented.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the April 30, 2007 interim condensed consolidated financial statements to conform them to the April 30, 2008 interim condensed consolidated financial statements presentation. Such reclassifications do not have a material effect on net income as previously reported.

F-28


NOTE B - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

1. In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R requires: the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be measured at fair value as of the acquisition date; liabilities related to contingent consideration to be remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting period; and acquisition-related costs to be expensed as these are incurred. SFAS 141R also requires additional disclosures of information surrounding a business combination. The provisions of SFAS 141R are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and apply to business combinations that are completed on or after the date of adoption. The Company has not yet adopted this pronouncement, but expects that the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions the Company completes after the effective date, if any.

2. In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This Statement applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited.

Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

3. In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This Statement is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASB’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”.
 
Management does not expect that the application of this standard will have any significant effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

4. In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 “Fair Value Measurement”. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practice. The changes to current practice resulting from the application of this Statement relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The provisions of this Statement should be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this Statement is initially applied, except for certain exceptions stated in the Statement.
 
The implementation of this Statement had no significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
F-29


5. In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The application of this standard had no significant effect on the Company's results of operations or its financial condition.

6. Other recently issued FASB Statements or Interpretations, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins, and AICPA Emerging Issue Task Force Consensuses have either been implemented or are not applicable to the Company.
 
NOTE C - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
The balance of property and equipment at April 30, 2008 consists of the following:

 
 
Useful life
(years)
 
Amount
 
Vehicles under capital leases    
   
5
 
$
255,129
 
Leasehold improvements   
   
5
   
19,279
 
Computers   
   
3
   
212,862
 
Equipment   
   
3-5
   
124,402
 
Furniture and fixtures   
   
10
   
68,509
 
Projects in progress   
   
-
   
1,262,121
 
Total   
         
1,942,302
 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization   
         
(391,632
)
Property and equipment, net   
       
$
1,550,670
 
 
NOTE D - OTHER ASSETS
 
At April 30, 2008, non-current other assets include the following:
 
Intangible assets: 
 
 
 
 
Covenant not to compete, net of accumulated amortization of $48,333 
 
$
51,667
 
Customer-related intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $116,667 
 
 
33,333
 
Other assets 
 
 
11,586
 
   
 
$
96,586
 

Covenant not to compete represents the portion of the payment made in connection with the purchase of the Pharma-PR stock that was allocated to a non-competition covenant. Under this agreement, the then sole stockholder of Pharma-PR agreed not to compete with the Company for a period of five years. This amount is amortized on the straight-line method over the five-year term of the non-competition covenant.
 
Customer-related intangible assets consist mainly of a customer list which Pharma-PR acquired along with other assets from a business which performs in the United States consulting services similar to those performed by the Company in Puerto Rico. The value of the customer list is being amortized on the straight-line method over its estimated useful life of three years.

Intangible assets amortization expense for each of the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $35,000.
 
F-30


NOTE E - LINE-OF-CREDIT

The Company has available an unsecured line-of-credit with a financial institution, which provides for borrowings up to $250,000. This line of credit may be used as working capital whenever the Company’s bank account cannot meet its daily cash requirements. Interest on advances obtained from this line-of-credit will be paid at 2% over the bank’s prevailing prime rate. During the six-months period ended April 30, 2008 the line-of-credit was not used.

NOTE F - INCOME TAXES
 
As substantially all operations are being carried on by the Puerto Rico subsidiary, the Company's taxable income is subject to the Puerto Rico income tax at a maximum tax rate of 39% as provided by the 1994 Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as amended. However, for the year ended October 31, 2007, the Company was subject to an additional 2.5% special tax as imposed to corporations and partnerships by Puerto Rico Act No. 41of August 2005, as amended by Act No. 244 of November 2006.
 
The operations carried out in the United States by the Company’s subsidiary are taxed in the United States. With certain limitations, the Company receives a credit on its Puerto Rico tax for the federal income tax paid. Also, upon distribution of earnings by the Puerto Rican subsidiary to its parent those dividends are taxed at the federal level, however, the parent is able to receive a credit for the taxes paid by the subsidiary on its operations in Puerto Rico, to the extent of the federal taxes that result from those earnings (determined at rates which are normally lower than in Puerto Rico). As a result, the income tax expense of the Company, under its present corporate structure, would normally be the Puerto Rico taxes on operations in Puerto Rico, plus 10% withholding in Puerto Rico from dividends paid to the Puerto Rican subsidiary’s parent, plus federal taxes on operations in the United States.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.

As of April 30, 2008, the Company has not recognized deferred income taxes on $2,849,444 of undistributed earnings of its Puerto Rican subsidiary, since such earnings are considered to be reinvested indefinitely. If the earnings were distributed in the form of dividends, the Company would be subject to a $284,944 tollgate tax.

The reasons for the difference between the provision for income tax applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico were as follows:
 
   
Six months
ended April 30,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
Theoretical income tax expense by application of statutory rates to the book pre-tax income
 
$
493,278
 
$
618,113
 
Permanent differences, net
   
21,665
   
23,587
 
Income tax expense
 
$
514,943
 
$
641,700
 
 
F-31


NOTE G - DUE TO AFFILIATE

Pursuant to a plan and agreement of merger dated January 25, 2006, the Company agreed to pay its then sole stockholder of Pharma-PR three installments of $2,750,000 on January 25, 2007, 2008 and 2009, including imputed interest determined in accordance with Section 1274 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of April 30, 2008 two installments were paid.

Outstanding installment as of April 30, 2008:

Installment due January 25, 2009 
 
$
2,750,000
 
Less: imputed interest 
   
(133,070
)
Present value of minimum payment, due within one year 
 
$
2,616,930
 
 
NOTE H - LEASE COMMITMENTS
 
Capitalized lease obligations - As of April 30, 2008, the Company leases vehicles under non-cancelable capital leases with a cost of $255,129 (accumulated depreciation of $134,976). Amortization expense for these assets amounted to $23,828 and $22,144 in the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The following is a schedule, by year, of future minimum lease payments under the capitalized leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments at April 30, 2008:
 
Twelve months ending April 30,  
 
Amount
 
2009  
 
$
56,294
 
2010  
   
78,028
 
2011 
   
17,439
 
2012 
   
8,054
 
2013 
   
6,042
 
Total future minimum lease payments  
   
165,857
 
Less: Amount of imputed interest  
   
( 12,496
)
Present value of future minimum lease payments  
   
153,361
 
Current portion of obligation under capital leases 
   
(49,377
)
Long-term portion  
 
$
103,984
 

Operating facilities - The Company conducts its administrative operations in office facilities which are leased under three different rental agreements.

In February 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with an affiliate of the chief executive officer for the new headquarters and laboratory testing facilities in Dorado, Puerto Rico. The lease agreement is for a term of five years with monthly rental payments of $18,750, $19,687, $20,672, $21,705 and $22,791 for each of the years under the lease. The lease agreement ends in January 2012 and provides a five year-renewal option. The agreement also requires the payment of utilities, property taxes, insurance and a portion of expenses incurred by the affiliate in connection with the maintenance of common areas. Through January 2007, a different smaller facility was leased from the same entity.
 
In August 2007, the Company renewed its lease agreement for office facilities in Limerick, Pennsylvania. The lease agreement was renewed for a term of three years with monthly rental payments of $1,050, $1,100, and $1,150; for each of the years under the lease which ends in July 2010.
 
F-32


The Company maintains office facilities in Cork, Ireland. The facilities are under a month-to-month lease with monthly payments of approximately $750.

The Company leases certain apartments as dwellings for employees. The leases are under short-term lease agreements and usually are cancelable upon 30-day notification.

Minimum future rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of April 30, 2008 are:
 
   
 
Amount
 
2009 
 
$
252,253
 
2010 
   
264,813
 
2011 
   
267,171
 
2012 
   
205,117
 
Total minimum lease payments  
 
$
989,354
 

Rent expense during the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 was $189,249 and $89,063, respectively.

NOTE I - STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
 
In October 2005, the Company's board of directors adopted, and on April 25, 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved, the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, covering 2,500,000 shares of common stock. The 2005 plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified options, stock grants, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based incentives to employees, including officers, and consultants. The 2005 plan is to be administered by a committee of independent directors. In the absence of a committee, the plan is administered by the board of directors. Options intended to be incentive stock options must be granted at an exercise price per share which is not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and may have a term which is not longer than ten years. If the option holder holds at least 10% of the Company’s common stock, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant and the term of the option cannot exceed five years.

Effective November 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No.123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”). The Company recognizes stock-based compensation based on the fair value of the awards. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of awards that will be forfeited.

The following table presents the stock-based compensation included in the Company’s consolidated statement of income and the effect on earnings per share:  
 
 
 
Six-months ended
 
 
 
April 30,
 
 
 
 2008
 
2007
 
Stock-based compensation expense:
           
Cost of services
 
$
30,588
 
$
42,090
 
Selling, general and administrative
   
44,430
   
23,284
 
 
   
   
 
Stock-based compensation before tax
   
75,018
   
65,374
 
Income tax benefit
   
   
 
 
   
   
 
Net stock-based compensation expense
 
$
75,018
 
$
65,374
 
 
 During the six-month period ended in April 30 2008, in accordance with the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company awarded stock options to certain employees, executives and directors to purchase an aggregate of 370,000 shares of common stock.
 
F-33


NOTE J – WARRANTS
 
At April 30, 2008 the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 12,188,892 shares of the Company’s common stock at prices ranging from $0.06 to $1.65 per share. The warrants became exercisable at various dates commencing in 2004 and expire at various dates through 2014.
 
NOTE K – EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following data show the amounts used in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the six-month periods ended in April 30, 2008 and 2007.
 
 
 
Six months ended 
April 30,
 
 
 
2008
 
2007
 
Net income available to common equity holders – used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share
 
$
627,907
 
$
847,728
 
 
             
Weighted average number of common shares – used to compute basic earnings per share
   
19,615,539
   
19,162,866
 
Effect of warrants to purchase common stock
   
2,497,167
   
2,734,996
 
Effect of options to purchase common stock
   
1,300
   
-
 
 
             
Weighted average number of shares – used to compute dilute earnings per share
   
22,114,006
   
21,897,862
 
 
Warrants for 9,439,292 for the purchase of shares of common stock for the six-month periods ended in April 30, 2008 and 2007, were not included in computing diluted earning per share because, their effects were antidilutive. In addition, options for the purchase of common stock in the amount of 1,266,772 and 1,143,090 for the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were not included in computing diluted earning per share because their effects were antidilutive.
 
NOTE L - CONCENTRATION OF RISKS
 
Cash and cash equivalents

The Company maintains cash deposits in a FDIC insured bank and in a money market obligations trust, registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The bank deposit balances frequently exceed federally insured limits. The money market fund is not insured. No losses have been experienced on these accounts.
 
F-34

 
Accounts receivable and revenues

Management deems all its accounts receivables to be fully collectible, and, as such, does not maintain any allowances for uncollectible receivables.
 
The Company's revenues, and the related receivables, are concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry in Puerto Rico and the United States of America. Although few customers represent a significant source of revenue, our functions are not a continuous process, accordingly, the client base for which our services are typically rendered, on a project-by-project basis, changes regularly.

The Company provides a substantial portion of its services to four customers, which account 10% or more of our revenues in the six month periods ended April 30, 2008 or 2007. For the six-month period ended April 30, 2008 revenues from these customers were 28%, 26%, 11% and 0%, or a total of 65%, as compared to the same period last year for 3%, 25%, 6% and 31%, or a total of 65%, respectively. At April 30, 2008 amounts due from these customers represent 51% of total accounts receivable balance.
 
NOTE M - RETIREMENT PLAN
 
Pharma-PR has a qualified profit sharing plan in accordance with the provision of Section l165(a)(3)(A) of the Puerto Rico Code, for employees who meet certain age and service period requirements. The Company makes contributions to this plan as required by the provisions of the plan document. Contributions for the six-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007 were $30,630 and $28,554, respectively.
 
F-35


Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

The estimated expenses of the registration, all of which will be paid by us, are as follows:

Item
 
Amount
 
SEC filing fee
 
$
1,134.22
 
Printing and filing
   
5,000.00
Legal expenses, including blue sky
   
25,000.00
 
Accounting expenses
   
4,000.00
Miscellaneous
   
1,000.00
Total
 
$
36,134.22
 

*
Estimated.
Previously paid.
  
Item 14. Indemnification of Officers and Directors 
 
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation may indemnify directors and officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement in connection with various actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, a derivative action, if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if they had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. A similar standard is applicable in the case of derivative actions, except that indemnification only extends to expenses including attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of such actions, and the statute requires court approval before there can be any indemnification where the person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the corporation. The statute provides that it is not exclusive of other indemnification that may be granted by a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws, agreement, a vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
 
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended from time to time, each person that such section grants us the power to indemnify.
 
The Delaware General Corporation Law permits a corporation to provide in its certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders; acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; payments of unlawful dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions, or any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
 
Our certificate of incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, none of our directors will be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director.
 
Each selling stockholder and the Company have agreed to mutual indemnification provisions with respect to certain liabilities incurred in connection with this offering as the result of claims made under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or state law.
 
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or controlling persons of the Company, pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Company in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered hereunder, the Company will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
 


Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
 
1. On January 25, 2006, contemporaneously with the consummation of the acquisition, the Company sold, in a private placement, 47 units, each unit consisting of 25,000 shares of series A preferred stock, warrants to purchase 85,100 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share and warrants to purchase 85,100 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share. In the private placement, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,175,000 shares of series A preferred stock (which were convertible into an aggregate of 15,998,800 shares of common stock), warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share, and warrants to purchase 3,999,700 shares of common stock at $1.65 per share, to 42 accredited investors. The Company paid brokerage commissions of 10% of the gross purchase price and an aggregate non-accountable expense allowance of 3% of the gross purchase price with respect to the units sold. In certain cases, the broker waived the commission and non-accountable expense allowance, and the investor paid the purchase price less the commission and non-accountable expense allowance. The purchase price for the 47 units sold was $11,750,000. Broker-dealers waived commission and non-accountable expense allowance with respect to $628,750, the Company paid commissions and non-accountable expense allowances totaling $898,750, and the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,439,892 shares of common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.7344 per share and a term of three years. As of October 31, 2007, the warrants disclosed herein were still outstanding.
 
Each share of series A preferred stock was automatically converted into 13.616 shares of common stock, or an aggregate of 15,998,800 shares of common stock upon the filing on April 25, 2006, of a restated certificate of incorporation which increased the authorized capital stock to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 50,000,000 shares of common stock.
 
The subscription agreement pursuant to which the series A preferred stock and warrants were issued required the Company to file a registration statement within 60 days after the effective date of the merger between the Company and Plaza Acquisition Corp. The effective date of the merger was January 25, 2006, therefore, the 60-day term expired on March 26, 2006. Since the Company failed to file the registration statement by that date, the Company was required to issue .0003 shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued upon conversion of the series A preferred stock for each day of delay. The Company was three days late, therefore, 14,401 shares of common stock were issued to the former holders of the series A preferred stock.
 
The warrants issued in the private placement expire five years from the closing date and are callable by the Company if the closing price of the common stock is at least twice the exercise price of the warrants for twenty consecutive trading days.   The securities were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506.
 
2. In January 2006, the Company granted 1,400,000 options to purchase common stock to key employees. No shares have been issued pursuant to the plan. The options were granted pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as amended, as issuances not involving a public offering. No consideration was received for the grant of the options and no options may be exercised until and unless a registration statement on Form S-8 has been filed with the SEC. The shares issuable upon exercise of the options will be registered pursuant to the Securities Act on a Form S-8.
 
The Company believes that all of the above transactions were transactions not involving any public offering within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as amended, since (a) each of the transactions involved the offering of such securities to a substantially limited number of persons; (b) each person took the securities as an investment for his/her/its own account and not with a view to distribution; (c) each person had access to information equivalent to that which would be included in a registration statement on the applicable form under the Securities Act, as amended; (d) each person had knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to understand the merits and risk of the investment; therefore no registration statement needed to be in effect prior to such issuances.
 


Item 16. Exhibits
 
Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
3.1
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation 1
3.2
 
By-laws 2
3.3
 
Amendment to the By-laws, dated June 3, 2008 8
4.1
 
Form of warrant issued to Investors in January 2006 private placement 3
4.2
 
Form of warrant held by initial warrant holders 3
4.3
 
Form of warrant held by San Juan Holdings 3
4.4
 
Form of warrants issued to broker-dealers in January 2006 private placement 3
5.1
 
Opinion of Akerman Senterfitt.*
10.1
 
Form of subscription agreement for January 2006 private placement 3
10.2
 
Registration rights provisions for the subscription agreement relating to January 2006 private placement 3
10.3
 
Registration rights provisions for Elizabeth Plaza and San Juan Holdings, Inc. 3
10.4
 
Employment Agreement dated January 2, 2008 between the Registrant and Elizabeth Plaza 7
10.5
 
Employment Agreement Amendment dated June 9, 2008 between the Registrant and Elizabeth Plaza*
10.6
 
Employment Agreement dated December 4, 2007 between the Registrant and Juan P. Gutierrez 7
10.7
 
Employment agreement dated January 25, 2006, between the Registrant and Nélida Plaza 3
10.8
 
2005 Long-term Incentive Plan 3
10.9
 
Registration rights provisions for the subscription agreement 3
10.10
 
Lease dated March 16, 2004 between Plaza Professional Center, Inc. and the Registrant 4
10.11
 
Lease dated November 1, 2004 between Plaza Professional Center, Inc. and the Registrant 4
10.12
 
Employment Agreement dated March 24, 2006 between the Registrant and Manuel O. Morera 5
10.13
 
Agreement dated May 4, 2006 between Schering-Plough Products, LLC. and Plaza Consulting Group, Inc. 4
10.14
 
Agreement dated January 17, 2006 between Lilly del Caribe, Inc. and Plaza Consulting Group, Inc. 4
10.15
 
Agreement effective as of November 1, 2005 between SB Pharmco Puerto Rico Inc. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline 4
21.1
 
List of Subsidiaries 7
23.1
 
Consent of Horwath Velez & Co, PSC*
24.1
 
Power of Attorney 9
 

*      Filed herewith
1
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the Commission on May 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
2
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s registration statement of Form 10-SB, which was filed with the Commission on September 24, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
3
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the Commission on January 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
4
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s registration statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-132847, which was declared effective by the Commission on November 8, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
5
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the Commission on April 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
6
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB, which was filed with the Commission on February 2, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
7
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB, which was filed with the Commission on January 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
8
Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K, which was filed with the Commission on June 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
9
Previously filed with the Company's Registration Statement, File No. 333-132847 on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on March 30, 2006.
 


Item 17. Undertakings
 
The undersigned Company hereby undertakes:
 
(1) To file, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:
 
(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
 
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a twenty percent (20%) change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement;
 
(iii) Include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.
 
(2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, the Company will treat each such post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of such securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering.
 
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
 
(4) For determining liability of the undersigned Company under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned Company undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned Company pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned Company will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
 
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned Company relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
 
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned Company or used or referred to by the undersigned Company;
 
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned Company or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned Company; and
 
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned Company to the purchaser.
 
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.
 
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Company in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Company will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
 


SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment to this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Dorado, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on this  26th day of June, 2008.
 
 
PHARMA-BIO SERV, INC.
   
 
By:
/s/ ELIZABETH PLAZA
 
Name:   Elizabeth Plaza
Title:     President and CEO
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Post-Effective Amendment to this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
s/ Elizabeth Plaza*
 
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
 
June 26, 2008
Elizabeth Plaza.
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/ Pedro J. Lasanta
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
June 26, 2008
Pedro J. Lasanta
 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/ Kirk Michel*
 
Director
 
June 26, 2008
Kirk Michel
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/ Dov Perlysky*
 
Director
 
June 26, 2008
Dov Perlysky
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/ Howard Spindel*
 
Director
 
June 26, 2008
Howard Spindel
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
s/ Irving Wiesen*
 
Director
 
June 26, 2008
Irving Wiesen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*By: s/ Elizabeth Plaza
 
 
 
 
Elizabeth Plaza, attorney-in-fact