China
Eastern Airlines Corporation Limited
(Registrant)
|
||
|
|
|
Date February 26, 2008 | By: |
/s/
Li
Fenghua
|
Name: Li Fenghua |
||
Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Reference
is made to the announcement published by the Company dated 21
January 2008
in respect of the investment and cooperation proposal of China
National
Aviation Corporation (Group) Limited (“CNAC”)
(such proposal is hereinafter referred to as the “CNAC
Proposal”).
With
respect to the CNAC Proposal, the board of directors of the Company
(the
“Board”)
has conducted careful and thorough discussions, and has also
sought the
advice of legal adviser, Chen & Co. Law Firm, and financial adviser,
Shenyin & Wanguo Securities Co., Ltd. The Board has decided that it
will not give further consideration to the CNAC Proposal. The
Company will
continue its efforts in introducing strategic investors so as
to improve
and strengthen its core business in the aviation transport industry.
|
1. |
The
whole process in which CNAC made its proposal to the Company,
and the mode
of communication adopted by CNAC, have failed to demonstrate
to the
Company that CNAC has sincere intentions to cooperate with the
Company.
CNAC has also failed to demonstrate that it has conducted in-depth
and
thorough planning in relation to its proposed cooperation with
the
Company. In the absence of sincerity and planning on the part
of CNAC and
mutual trust between CNAC and the Company, it would be difficult
to
establish the foundation of cooperation between the two companies,
and
accordingly, it --would also be difficult for the synergy from
such
cooperation as described in the CNAC Proposal to
materialize.
|
2. |
The
Board has given due consideration to the analysis made and the
risks
pointed out by its legal adviser, that is: the CNAC Proposal
does not have
the effect of a legally binding offer, and there is a high level
of
uncertainty associated with such proposal due to legal and regulatory
approval issues.
|
3. |
The
Board has also given due consideration to the analysis prepared
by its
financial adviser as follows: the Company’s primary objectives of
introducing a strategic investor are to gain access to world-class
management know-how, to improve its management, operation efficiency
and
profitability, and to enhance its competitiveness in the international
aviation market, so as to protect the long-term benefits of all
its
shareholders, but CNAC and/or the relevant parties it represents
would not
be able to help the Company to achieve these primary objectives.
|
(i) |
The
CNAC Proposal is unclear as to the specific terms of the proposed
cooperation between CNAC and China Eastern Airlines Corporation
Limited
(“CEA”).
It is also unclear as to the identity of the implementing party
of such
proposed cooperation. The CNAC Proposal does not have the effect
of a
legally binding offer under contract law, is not legally binding
on CNAC,
and can be withdrawn or amended at any time by CNAC at will.
|
(ii) |
The
implementation of the CNAC Proposal may face many legal and regulatory
obstacles, and accordingly, there is a high level of uncertainty
with
respect to the CNAC Proposal. These obstacles include but are
not limited
to the following:
|
(a) |
The
CNAC Proposal has gone beyond the scope of the current policies
in China,
and therefore needs special approval by relevant PRC governmental
authorities. There is a high level of uncertainty as to whether
such
special approval can be obtained.
|
(b) |
The
implementation of the business cooperation between Air China
Limited
(“Air
China”)
and CEA referred to in the CNAC Proposal may have to be subject
to the
approval of the shareholders of Air China and CEA in their respective
shareholders’ meetings. As such cooperation may be regarded as connected
transactions, CNAC and its controlling shareholder, China National
Aviation Holding Company (“CNAHC”),
would be required to abstain from voting on the resolutions to
approve
such connected transactions during the respective shareholders’ meetings
of Air China and CEA. Accordingly, it is also uncertain whether
the
implementation of the CNAC Proposal and the business cooperation
would win
the respective approvals of the shareholders of Air China and
CEA.
|
(c) |
The
CNAC Proposal may lead to the issue of competition between Air
China and
CEA, both being listed companies, and CNAC has not proposed any
effective
solutions to it.
|
(d) |
The
CNAC Proposal may give rise to anti-trust scrutiny and other
issues.
|
(i) |
CEA’s
primary objectives of introducing a strategic investor are to
gain access
to world-class management know-how and to improve its management,
operation efficiency and profitability for the protection of
the long-term
benefits of all its shareholders. Singapore Airlines Limited
(“SIA”),
being the most profitable airline in the world and ranked the
highest in
terms of customer satisfaction in Asia, has demonstrated its
superior
strengths in many areas including management, branding, product
design,
service process management, route planning and profit management.
The
cooperation between CEA and SIA will be superior to the cooperation
between CEA and CNAC in many aspects including complementary
routes, cost
control and other synergies, and more beneficial to CEA in terms
of
enhancing its core strengths and ability to compete in the international
aviation market. In other words, the CNAC Proposal will not help
CEA to
achieve its primary objectives of introducing a strategic investor.
|
(ii) |
Owing
to an overlap in the market and targeted customer base, Air China
is one
of the major competitors of CEA. Currently, CNAC and its controlling
shareholder, CNAHC, hold in aggregate more than 50 per cent of
the shares
in Air China, and CNAC has clearly stated its intention to become
a major
shareholder of CEA. Under the CNAC Proposal, after the purchase
by CNAC of
CEA’s H-shares, CNAC as a shareholder of CEA would be in competition
with
CEA, and such competition would be in contravention of the current
requirement of governmental authorities (including the China
Securities
Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”))
which stipulates that shareholders of a listed company should
avoid
competing with the listed company. Given that there is no effective
solution proposed by CNAC to resolve this issue, CEA should not,
for the
purposes of protecting the long-term interests of the shareholders
of CEA,
accept the CNAC Proposal, issue new H-shares to CNAC and thereby
enable
CNAC as a CEA shareholder to compete with CEA.
|
(iii) |
Under
the applicable laws and regulations, the CNAC Proposal will need
to be
approved by the relevant PRC governmental authorities, including
but not
limited to the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration
Commission, the CSRC and the General Administration of Civil
Aviation of
China. The cooperation between CNAC and its related parties on
the one
hand, and CEA and China Eastern Air Holding Company on the other
hand,
would also involve many rounds of discussions and negotiations
between the
parties. Judging from the fact that it has taken CEA and SIA
two years to
prepare their cooperation proposal, the implementation of the
CNAC
Proposal would require a long period of time and is subject to
a high
level of uncertainty. The delay and the uncertainty will make
it
impossible for CEA to meet its imminent development needs and
may cause
CEA to miss valuable opportunities for development. This will
severely
affect the future operations and development of CEA, and harm
the
short-term and long-term interests of its
shareholders.
|
Li
Fenghua
|
(Chairman,
Non-executive Director)
|
Li
Jun
|
(Vice
Chairman, Non-executive Director)
|
Cao
Jianxiong
|
(President,
Executive Director)
|
Luo
Chaogeng
|
(Non-executive
Director)
|
Luo
Zhuping
|
(Executive
Director)
|
Hu
Honggao
|
(Independent
Non-executive Director)
|
Peter
Lok
|
(Independent
Non-executive Director)
|
Wu
Baiwang
|
(Independent
Non-executive Director)
|
Zhou
Ruijin
|
(Independent
Non-executive Director)
|
Xie
Rong
|
(Independent
Non-executive Director)
|