UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2007
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-51928
CPI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
75-3142681
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
811 Hansen
Way
Palo Alto, California 94303-1110
(650) 846-2900
(Address of
Principal Executive Offices and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated filer x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding for each of the registrants classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date: 16,314,032 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, at April 30, 2007.
CPI
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
and subsidiaries
INDEX
2
CPI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
and subsidiaries
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, readers can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential or continue, the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected, expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risk factors include, without limitation, competition in our end markets; our significant amount of debt; changes or reductions in the U.S. defense budget; U.S. government contracts laws and regulations; changes in technology; the impact of unexpected costs; inability to obtain raw materials and components; and currency fluctuations. All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this report that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing risk factors and other cautionary statements included herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.
The information in this report is not a complete description of our business or the risks and uncertainties associated with an investment in our securities. You should carefully consider the various risks and uncertainties that impact our business and the other information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC before you decide to invest in our securities or to maintain or increase your investment.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data unaudited)
|
|
March 30, |
|
September 29, |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
27,605 |
|
$ |
30,153 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
1,937 |
|
1,746 |
|
||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
47,293 |
|
43,628 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
56,910 |
|
54,031 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
11,560 |
|
11,520 |
|
||
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
3,658 |
|
3,080 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
148,963 |
|
144,158 |
|
||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
65,978 |
|
63,851 |
|
||
Deferred debt issue costs, net |
|
8,917 |
|
9,644 |
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
74,268 |
|
75,489 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
147,271 |
|
147,489 |
|
||
Other long-term assets |
|
558 |
|
1,128 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
445,955 |
|
$ |
441,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
20,629 |
|
19,101 |
|
||
Accrued expenses |
|
23,312 |
|
23,269 |
|
||
Product warranty |
|
5,525 |
|
5,958 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
6,050 |
|
10,693 |
|
||
Advance payments from customers |
|
6,017 |
|
6,310 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
61,533 |
|
67,045 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
29,613 |
|
29,933 |
|
||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
241,808 |
|
245,067 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
60 |
|
41 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
333,014 |
|
342,086 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 90,000,000 shares authorized; 4,275,566 shares issued and outstanding) authorized; 16,291,889 and 16,049,577 shares issued and outstanding) |
|
163 |
|
160 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
67,371 |
|
65,295 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
273 |
|
679 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
45,134 |
|
33,539 |
|
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
112,941 |
|
99,673 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
445,955 |
|
$ |
441,759 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except share and
per share data unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||||
Sales |
|
$ |
88,444 |
|
$ |
86,929 |
|
$ |
172,167 |
|
$ |
169,308 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
60,739 |
|
61,185 |
|
117,881 |
|
118,356 |
|
||||
Gross profit |
|
27,705 |
|
25,744 |
|
54,286 |
|
50,952 |
|
||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Research and development |
|
2,352 |
|
1,941 |
|
4,243 |
|
3,851 |
|
||||
Selling and marketing |
|
4,799 |
|
4,680 |
|
9,628 |
|
9,704 |
|
||||
General and administrative |
|
5,846 |
|
4,676 |
|
10,250 |
|
11,978 |
|
||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
546 |
|
546 |
|
1,094 |
|
1,094 |
|
||||
Net loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
40 |
|
143 |
|
58 |
|
208 |
|
||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
13,583 |
|
11,986 |
|
25,273 |
|
26,835 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
14,122 |
|
13,758 |
|
29,013 |
|
24,117 |
|
||||
Interest expense, net |
|
5,275 |
|
6,400 |
|
10,614 |
|
12,464 |
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
8,847 |
|
7,358 |
|
18,399 |
|
11,653 |
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
3,087 |
|
3,013 |
|
6,804 |
|
5,093 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,760 |
|
$ |
4,345 |
|
$ |
11,595 |
|
$ |
6,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net unrealized loss on cash flow hedges |
|
(17 |
) |
(306 |
) |
(406 |
) |
(489 |
) |
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
5,743 |
|
$ |
4,039 |
|
$ |
11,189 |
|
$ |
6,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share - Basic |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Earnings per share - Diluted |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Shares used to compute earnings per share - Basic |
|
16,253,522 |
|
13,078,954 |
|
16,161,149 |
|
13,078,954 |
|
||||
Shares used to compute earnings per share - Diluted |
|
17,730,318 |
|
14,784,947 |
|
17,646,457 |
|
14,776,514 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands unaudited)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
6,299 |
|
$ |
(4,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenses relating to sale of San Carlos property |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(5,347 |
) |
(5,817 |
) |
||
Capitalized expenses relating to potential business acquisition |
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(5,466 |
) |
(5,821 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
||
Repayments of debt |
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees |
|
398 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
542 |
|
|
|
||
Payment of IPO financing costs |
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
||
Stockholder distribution payments |
|
|
|
(17,000 |
) |
||
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises |
|
679 |
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(3,381 |
) |
(8,374 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(2,548 |
) |
(18,710 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
30,153 |
|
26,511 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
27,605 |
|
$ |
7,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
10,707 |
|
$ |
12,378 |
|
Cash paid for taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
10,495 |
|
$ |
4,607 |
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(All tabular dollar amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)
Unless the context otherwise requires, CPI International means CPI International, Inc., and CPI means Communications & Power Industries, Inc. CPI is a direct subsidiary of CPI International. CPI International is a holding company with no operations of its own. The term the Company refers to CPI International and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated results and financial position of CPI International, which is controlled by affiliates of The Cypress Group (Cypress). CPI International, through its wholly owned subsidiary, CPI, develops, manufactures, and distributes microwave and power grid Vacuum Electron Devices (VEDs), microwave amplifiers, modulators and various other power supply equipment and devices. The Company has two reportable segments, VED and satcom equipment.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include those of the Company and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany balances, transactions, and stockholdings have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Companys fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period that ends on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2007 comprises the 52-week period ending September 28, 2007 and fiscal year 2006 comprised the 52-week period ended September 29, 2006. All period references are to the Companys fiscal periods unless otherwise indicated. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 29, 2006.
On May 3, 2006, the Company completed the initial public offering of its common stock (see Note 4 for further disclosure).
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $0.1 million and $0.5 million at March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively.
Inventories: The following table provides details of inventories, net of reserves:
|
March 30, |
|
September 29, |
|
|||
Raw material and parts |
|
$ |
37,058 |
|
$ |
35,160 |
|
Work in process |
|
12,375 |
|
10,481 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
7,477 |
|
8,390 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
56,910 |
|
$ |
54,031 |
|
7
Reserve for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventory: The following table summarizes the activity related to reserves for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventory:
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,822 |
|
$ |
8,655 |
|
Inventory provision, charged to cost of sales |
|
540 |
|
473 |
|
||
Inventory write-offs |
|
(218 |
) |
(151 |
) |
||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
9,144 |
|
$ |
8,977 |
|
Reserve for loss contracts and cost in excess of market inventory: The following table summarizes the activity related to reserves for loss contracts and cost in excess of market inventory:
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
Provision for loss contracts and cost in excess of market inventory, charged to cost of sales |
|
49 |
|
652 |
|
||
Credit to cost of sales upon revenue recognition |
|
(453 |
) |
(629 |
) |
||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
Product Warranty: The following table summarizes the activity related to product warranty:
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
||
Beginning accrued warranty |
|
$ |
5,958 |
|
$ |
6,359 |
|
Accruals for product warranty, charged to cost of sales |
|
2,374 |
|
2,738 |
|
||
Cost of warranty claims |
|
(2,807 |
) |
(2,679 |
) |
||
Ending accrued warranty |
|
$ |
5,525 |
|
$ |
6,418 |
|
8
Intangible Assets: The following tables present the details of the Companys total acquisition-related intangible assets:
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
September 29, 2006 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net |
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net |
|
||||||
VED Core Technology |
|
$ |
30,700 |
|
$ |
(1,965 |
) |
$ |
28,735 |
|
$ |
30,700 |
|
$ |
(1,659 |
) |
$ |
29,041 |
|
VED Application Technology |
|
19,800 |
|
(2,526 |
) |
17,274 |
|
19,800 |
|
(2,130 |
) |
17,670 |
|
||||||
X-ray Generator and Satcom ApplicationTechnology |
|
8,000 |
|
(1,708 |
) |
6,292 |
|
8,000 |
|
(1,441 |
) |
6,559 |
|
||||||
Customer backlog |
|
17,450 |
|
(17,450 |
) |
|
|
17,450 |
|
(17,450 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Land lease |
|
11,810 |
|
(833 |
) |
10,977 |
|
11,810 |
|
(706 |
) |
11,104 |
|
||||||
Tradename |
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
||||||
Customer list and programs |
|
5,700 |
|
(565 |
) |
5,135 |
|
5,700 |
|
(451 |
) |
5,249 |
|
||||||
Noncompete agreement |
|
110 |
|
(55 |
) |
55 |
|
110 |
|
(44 |
) |
66 |
|
||||||
|
|
$ |
99,370 |
|
$ |
(25,102 |
) |
$ |
74,268 |
|
$ |
99,370 |
|
$ |
(23,881 |
) |
$ |
75,489 |
|
The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangibles as of March 30, 2007, excluding the Companys unamortized tradename, is as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
2007 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
2008 |
|
2,446 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2,446 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2,424 |
|
|
2011 |
|
2,424 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
57,505 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,468 |
|
Goodwill: The following table presents goodwill by reportable segment at March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006:
|
March 30, |
|
September 29, |
|
|||
VED |
|
$ |
133,440 |
|
$ |
133,637 |
|
Satcom Equipment |
|
13,831 |
|
13,852 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
147,271 |
|
$ |
147,489 |
|
The decrease in goodwill from September 29, 2006 to March 30, 2007 was due to an adjustment for tax benefits realized from the exercise of fully vested stock options that were acquired in a business combination.
9
Long-term debt comprises the following:
|
March 30, |
|
September 29, |
|
|||
Term loan, expiring 2010 |
|
$ |
37,500 |
|
$ |
42,500 |
|
8% Senior subordinated notes, due 2012 |
|
125,000 |
|
125,000 |
|
||
Floating rate senior notes, due 2015, net of issue discount of $692 and $719 |
|
79,308 |
|
79,281 |
|
||
|
|
241,808 |
|
246,781 |
|
||
Less: Current portion |
|
|
|
1,714 |
|
||
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
241,808 |
|
$ |
245,067 |
|
Senior Credit Facility and Term Loan of CPI: In fiscal year 2004, CPI entered into a $130.0 million credit agreement, which was amended and restated on November 29, 2004, and further amended on February 16, 2005, April 13, 2005, and December 15, 2005 (the Senior Credit Facility). The Senior Credit Facility consists of a $40.0 million revolving commitment, with a sub-facility of $15.0 million for letters of credit and $5.0 million for swingline loans (Revolver), which expires on January 23, 2010, and a $90.0 million term loan (Term Loan), which expires on July 23, 2010. As of March 30, 2007, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolver and $37.5 million outstanding under the Term Loan, after taking into account a $5.0 million Term Loan repayment in December 2006 using available operating cash. The $5.0 million Term Loan repayment included a $1.7 million ECF (as defined below) payment, and an optional prepayment of $3.3 million. In December 2005, CPI borrowed $10.0 million on the Term Loan to pay a dividend to CPI International. CPI International used the proceeds of that dividend to pay a portion of the special cash dividend of $17.0 million to its stockholders. Upon certain specified conditions, including compliance on a pro forma basis with the covenants in the Senior Credit Facility, CPI may seek commitments for a new class of term loans, not to exceed $65.0 million. The Senior Credit Facility is guaranteed by CPI International and all of CPIs domestic subsidiaries and is secured by substantially all of their assets.
Any borrowings under the Revolver would currently bear interest at a rate equal to, at CPIs option, LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, or the Alternate Base Rate (ABR) plus 1.75% per annum. Available borrowings under the Revolver are reduced by any amounts secured through letters of credit; at March 30, 2007, the Company had letters of credit commitments for $3.8 million. The Term Loan borrowings currently bear interest at a rate equal to, at CPIs option, LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum or the ABR plus 1.25% per annum, payable quarterly. The ABR is the greater of (a) the Prime Rate and (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%. In addition to customary fronting and administrative fees under the Senior Credit Facility, CPI pays letter of credit participation fees equal to the applicable Revolver LIBOR margin per annum on the average daily amount of the letter of credit exposure, and a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused amount of revolving commitment. As of March 30, 2007 (1) the Term Loan borrowing consisted of one tranche of $5.5 million and one tranche of $32.0 million with interest payable on April 12, 2007 and April 23, 2007, each at 7.6% per annum, and (2) a Revolving commitment of $3.8 million for letter of credit exposure, with letter of credit participation fees and fronting fees payable quarterly at a combined interest rate of 3.0% per annum.
10
The Senior Credit Facility requires 1.0% of the original Term Loan amount to be repaid annually in quarterly installments of 0.25% beginning June 30, 2004 and continuing for five years, with the remainder due in equal quarterly installments thereafter. CPI is required to prepay its outstanding loans, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, with net cash proceeds received from certain events, including, without limitation (1) all such proceeds received from certain asset sales by CPI International, CPI or any of CPIs subsidiaries, (2) all such proceeds received from issuances of debt (other than certain specified permitted debt) or preferred stock by CPI International, CPI or any of CPIs subsidiaries, (3) all such proceeds paid to CPI International, CPI or any of CPIs subsidiaries from casualty and condemnation events in excess of amounts applied to replace, restore or reinvest in any properties for which proceeds were paid within a specified period and (4) 50% of such proceeds received from issuances of common equity by, or equity contributions to, CPI International.
CPI is also required to make an annual prepayment within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year based on a calculation of Excess Cash Flow, as defined in the Senior Credit Facility (ECF), multiplied by a factor of 25%, 50% or 75% depending on the leverage ratio at the end of the fiscal year, less optional prepayments made during the fiscal year. On December 30, 2004, CPI made an ECF payment of $3.9 million. The ECF payment was applied pro rata, in accordance with the provisions of the Senior Credit Facility, against the remaining scheduled installments of Term Loan principal due up to, but not including, the September 30, 2009 scheduled principal installment. The Company made an ECF payment of $1.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2006 in December 2006 and there is no expected ECF payment due for fiscal year 2007, primarily because of the $3.3 million optional prepayment that was made in December 2006.
CPI can make optional prepayments on the outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty, except for customary breakage costs with respect to LIBOR loans. In March 2005, CPI made an optional prepayment of $5.7 million; in May 2006, CPI made additional optional prepayments of $47.5 million in the aggregate using proceeds from the initial public offering of CPI Internationals common stock (the IPO); and in December 2006, CPI made an additional prepayment of $3.3 million. The optional prepayments were applied pro rata, in accordance with the provisions of the Senior Credit Facility, against the remaining scheduled installments of Term Loan principal due up to June 30, 2009, with the balance applied to scheduled installment amounts on or after September 30, 2009, in direct order of maturity.
The Senior Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of CPI International, CPI and CPIs domestic subsidiaries to: sell assets; engage in mergers and acquisitions; pay dividends and distributions or repurchase their capital stock; incur additional indebtedness or issue equity interests; make investments and loans; create liens or further negative pledges on assets; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; amend agreements or make prepayments relating to subordinated indebtedness; and amend or waive provisions of charter documents in a manner materially adverse to the lenders. CPI and CPIs subsidiaries must comply with: a minimum interest coverage ratio; a maximum total leverage ratio; a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio; and a maximum capital expenditures limitation, each calculated on a consolidated basis for CPI and CPIs subsidiaries. CPI International must also comply with a minimum interest coverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio, each calculated on a consolidated basis for CPI International and its subsidiaries. As of March 30, 2007, CPI and CPI International were in compliance with all Senior Credit Facility financial covenants.
11
Subject in certain cases to applicable notice provisions and grace periods, events of default under the Senior Credit Facility include, among other things: failure to make payments when due; breaches of representations and warranties in the documents governing the Senior Credit Facility; non-compliance by CPI International, CPI and/or CPIs subsidiaries with certain covenants; failure by CPI International, CPI and/or CPIs subsidiaries to pay certain other indebtedness or to observe any other covenants or agreements that would allow acceleration of such indebtedness, collectively in excess of $5.0 million at any time; events of bankruptcy or insolvency of CPI International, CPI and/or CPIs subsidiaries; certain uninsured and unstayed judgments of $5.0 million or more against CPI International; impairment of the security interests in the collateral or the guarantees under the Senior Credit Facility; and a change in control, as defined in the documents governing the Senior Credit Facility.
8% Senior subordinated notes of CPI: In connection with a business combination on January 23, 2004, CPI issued $125.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 8% Senior Subordinated Notes (the 8% Notes). The 8% Notes have no sinking fund requirements.
The 8% Notes bear interest at the rate of 8.0% per year, payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The 8% Notes will mature on February 1, 2012. The 8% Notes are unsecured obligations, jointly and severally guaranteed by CPI International and each of CPIs domestic subsidiaries. The payment of all obligations relating to the 8% Notes are subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full in cash or cash equivalents of all senior debt (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) of CPI, including debt under the Senior Credit Facility. Each guarantee of the 8% Notes is and will be subordinated to guarantor senior debt (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) on the same basis as the 8% Notes are subordinated to CPIs senior debt.
At any time or from time to time on or after February 1, 2008, CPI, at its option, may redeem the 8% Notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on February 1 of the years indicated below:
Year |
|
Optional |
|
2008 |
|
104 |
% |
2009 |
|
102 |
% |
2010 and thereafter |
|
100 |
% |
At any time on or prior to February 1, 2008, the 8% Notes may also be redeemed or purchased (by CPI or any other person) in whole but not in part, at CPIs option, upon the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8% Notes, plus a make-whole premium (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) to the redemption price on February 1, 2008, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, the date of redemption or purchase. Upon a change of control, CPI may be required to purchase all or any part of the 8% Notes for a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of purchase.
12
The indenture governing the 8% Notes contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of CPI and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) to incur additional indebtedness, sell assets, consolidate or merge with or into other companies, pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, issue capital stock of their subsidiaries, incur liens and enter into certain types of transactions with their affiliates.
Events of default under the indenture governing the 8% Notes include: failure to make payments on the 8% Notes when due; failure to comply with covenants in the indenture governing the 8% Notes; a default under certain other indebtedness of CPI or any of its restricted subsidiaries that is caused by a failure to make payments on such indebtedness or that results in the acceleration of the maturity of such indebtedness; the existence of certain final judgments or orders against CPI or any of the restricted subsidiaries; and the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy events.
Floating rate senior notes of CPI International: On February 22, 2005, CPI International issued $80.0 million in principal amount of its Floating Rate Senior Notes (FR Notes). The FR Notes were issued at a 1% discount. The proceeds from the issuance of FR Notes were used to make a distribution to stockholders of CPI International of approximately $75.8 million and to pay fees and expenses of approximately $3.5 million associated with the issuance of FR Notes. The FR Notes have no sinking fund requirements.
The FR Notes require interest payments at an annual interest rate, reset at the beginning of each semi-annual period, equal to the then six-month LIBOR plus 5.75%, payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year. The interest rate on the semi-annual interest payment due August 1, 2007 is approximately 11.15% per annum. CPI International may, at its option, elect to pay interest through the issuance of additional FR Notes for any interest payment date on or before February 1, 2010. If CPI International elects to pay interest through the issuance of additional FR Notes, the annual interest rate on the FR Notes will increase by an additional 1% step-up, with the step-up increasing by an additional 1% for each interest payment made through the issuance of additional FR Notes (up to a maximum of 4%). The FR Notes will mature on February 1, 2015.
The FR Notes are general unsecured obligations of CPI International. The FR Notes are not guaranteed by any of CPI Internationals subsidiaries but are structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of CPI Internationals subsidiaries. The FR Notes are senior in right of payment to CPI Internationals existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated to the FR Notes.
Because CPI International is a holding company with no operations of its own, CPI International relies on distributions from CPI to satisfy its obligations under the FR Notes. The Senior Credit Facility and the indenture governing the 8% Notes restrict CPIs ability to make distributions to CPI International. The Senior Credit Facility prohibits CPI from making distributions to CPI International unless there is no default under the Senior Credit Facility and CPI International and CPI satisfy certain leverage ratios. The indenture governing the 8% Notes prohibits CPI from making distributions to CPI International unless, among other things, there is no default under the indenture and the amount of the proposed dividend plus all previous Restricted Payments (as defined in the indenture governing the 8% Notes) does not exceed a specified amount.
13
At any time or from time to time CPI International, at its option, may redeem the Notes in whole or in part at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on February 1 of the years indicated below:
Year |
|
Optional |
|
2007 |
|
103 |
% |
2008 |
|
102 |
% |
2009 |
|
101 |
% |
2010 and thereafter |
|
100 |
% |
Upon a change of control, as defined in the indenture governing the FR Notes, CPI International may be required to purchase all or any part of the outstanding FR Notes for a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of purchase.
The indenture governing the FR Notes contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of CPI International and its restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the indenture governing the FR Notes) to incur additional indebtedness, sell assets, consolidate or merge with or into other companies, pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness, make certain investments, issue capital stock of their subsidiaries, incur liens and enter into certain types of transactions with their affiliates.
Events of default under the indenture governing the FR Notes include: failure to make payments on the FR Notes when due; failure to comply with covenants in the indenture governing the FR Notes; a default under certain other indebtedness of CPI International or any of its restricted subsidiaries that is caused by a failure to make payments on such indebtedness or that results in the acceleration of the maturity of such indebtedness; the existence of certain final judgments or orders against CPI International or any of the restricted subsidiaries; and the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy events.
Debt Maturities: As of March 30, 2007, maturities on long-term debt were as follows:
Fiscal Year |
|
Term Loan |
|
Floating Rate |
|
8% Senior |
|
Total |
|
||||
2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2010 |
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
||||
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Thereafter |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
125,000 |
|
205,000 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
37,500 |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
$ |
242,500 |
|
14
Common and Preferred Stock: On April 7, 2006, the Company amended and restated its certificate of incorporation to provide for 90,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. The holder of each share of common stock has the right to one vote. The board of directors has the authority to issue the undesignated preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. As of March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
On April 7, 2006, in connection with the amendment and restatement of its certificate of incorporation, the Company also effected a 3.059-to-1 stock split of its outstanding shares of common stock as of such date. All share and per share amounts in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively restated to reflect this stock split.
On May 3, 2006, the Company completed the IPO of its common stock. The Company sold 2,941,200 shares of common stock and the selling stockholders sold 4,117,670 shares, at an initial public offering price to the public of $18.00 per share, resulting in proceeds to the Company of approximately $47.3 million, net of IPO transaction costs of approximately $5.6 million. The Company used the net proceeds to repay $47.3 million of the Term Loan under the Senior Credit Facility.
The Company has four stock plans: the 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2006 ESPP), the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan) and the 2000 Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Plan).
2006 Plan: The 2006 Plan provides for an aggregate of up to 1,400,000 shares of CPI Internationals common stock to be available for awards, plus the number of shares subject to awards granted under the 2004 Plan and the 2000 Plan that are forfeited, expire or are cancelled after the effective date of the 2006 Plan. All of the Companys employees (including officers), directors, and consultants are eligible for awards under the 2006 Plan. The 2006 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (Compensation Committee) and awards may consist of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, other stock unit awards, performance awards, dividend equivalents or any combination of the foregoing. The exercise price for stock options generally cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.
2006 ESPP: The 2006 ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discounted price. An aggregate of 760,000 shares of common stock is reserved for issuance under this plan. The stock purchase plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Employees participating in the plan may purchase stock for their accounts according to a price formula set by the Compensation Committee, as administrator, before the applicable offering period, which cannot exceed 24 months. The price per share will equal a fixed percentage (which may not be lower than 85%) of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the last day of the purchase period in the offering, or the lower of (1) a fixed percentage (not to be less than 85%) of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of commencement of participation in the offering and (2) a fixed percentage (not to be less than 85%) of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of purchase. The initial 2006 ESPP offering
15
period began on July 1, 2006; the participants purchase price for CPI International, Inc. common stock will be 85% of the closing market price on the last trading day of each quarter.
2004 Plan: No further options are available for issuance under the 2004 Plan. The Company issued both time and performance stock option awards under the 2004 Plan. All stock option grants under the 2004 Plan were issued at exercise prices equal to or greater than the estimated market price of the Companys common stock at option grant date.
2000 Plan: No further options are available for issuance under the 2000 Plan. In accordance with the terms of the stock option agreements, the unvested stock options outstanding under the 2000 Plan became fully vested in February 2004 in connection with a business combination. The 2000 Plan option holders were offered the opportunity to either roll over their stock options from the predecessor company into options to purchase common stock of CPI International or exercise their stock options. Management elected to roll over options to purchase 912,613 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.20 to $0.74 per share.
Stock Options: A summary of the Companys stock option activity as of March 30, 2007, and changes during the six months then ended is presented below:
|
Number of |
|
Weighted- |
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
|
|||
Outstanding at September 29, 2006 |
|
3,163,057 |
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
291,000 |
|
14.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Exercised |
|
(206,949 |
) |
2.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Forfeited |
|
(31,141 |
) |
10.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding at March 30, 2007 |
|
3,215,967 |
|
$ |
5.47 |
|
7.05 |
|
$ |
44,232 |
|
Vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2007 |
|
3,188,743 |
|
$ |
5.41 |
|
7.04 |
|
$ |
44,028 |
|
Exercisable at March 30, 2007 |
|
2,308,489 |
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
6.48 |
|
$ |
37,448 |
|
The grant date fair value of awards granted during the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model, assuming no expected dividends and the following ranges of assumptions:
Expected term (in years) |
|
5.99 6.25 |
Expected volatility |
|
49.33% |
Risk-free rate |
|
4.56% 4.73% |
Grant date fair value |
|
$7.66 $9.07 |
16
Since the Companys common stock has not been publicly traded for a sufficient time period, the expected volatility is based on expected volatilities of similar companies that have a longer history of being publicly traded. The expected life of options granted is based on the simplified method for plain vanilla options in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The risk-free rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant.
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements during the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was $0.5 million. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $2.7 million during the first six months of fiscal year 2007. There were no options granted or exercised during the first six months of fiscal year 2006.
As of March 30, 2007, there was approximately $4.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 2.4 years.
Restricted Stock Awards: There were 11,466 and 9,999 shares of restricted stock granted to directors outstanding as of March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, respectively. The restricted stock awards vest over periods of one to three years and have a 10 year contractual life.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested restricted stock awards as of March 30, 2007, and changes during the six months then ended is presented below:
|
Number of |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
||
Nonvested at September 29, 2006 |
|
9,999 |
|
$ |
18.00 |
|
Granted |
|
7,022 |
|
17.09 |
|
|
Vested |
|
(5,555 |
) |
18.00 |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 30, 2007 |
|
11,466 |
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
As of March 30, 2007, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.6 years.
Share-Based Compensation Cost: There was no unrecognized compensation cost relating to stock options outstanding at the beginning of fiscal year 2006 and no stock options were granted during the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Therefore, there was no share-based compensation cost in the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Total share-based compensation cost for the Companys stock plans in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 comprise the following:
17
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||
Share-based compensation cost recognized in the income statement by caption: |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
102 |
|
Research and development |
|
26 |
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
51 |
|
|
General and administrative |
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
Share-based compensation cost capitalized in inventory |
|
$ |
107 |
|
Share-based compensation cost remaining in inventory at end of period |
|
$ |
36 |
|
Share-based compensation expense by type of award: |
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
435 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge the foreign currency exposure associated with forecasted manufacturing costs in Canada. As of March 30, 2007, CPI had outstanding forward contract commitments to purchase Canadian dollars for an aggregate U.S. notional amount of $21.5 million; the last forward contract expires on December 17, 2007. At March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts was a net liability of $0.2 million and an asset of $0.1 million, respectively, and the unrealized (loss) gain was $(0.1) million and $8 thousand, net of related tax expense, respectively.
The Companys foreign currency forward contracts are designated as a cash flow hedge and are considered highly effective, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The unrealized gains and losses from foreign exchange forward contracts are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, and the Company anticipates recognizing the entire unrealized loss in operating earnings within the next twelve months. Changes in the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, and are immediately recognized in General and Administrative in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The time value was not material for first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006. If the transaction being hedged fails to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is ineffective, then the Company promptly recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. No ineffective amounts were recognized due to anticipated transactions failing to occur in the first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006. Realized gains and losses from foreign currency forward contracts are recognized in cost of sales and general and administrative in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Net income in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 includes a recognized loss from foreign currency forward contracts of $0.1 million. Net income in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 includes a recognized gain from foreign currency forward contracts of $1.0 million.
18
In April 2005, the Company expanded its use of derivatives to hedge the interest rate exposure associated with the FR Notes. On April 15, 2005, the Company entered into an $80 million interest rate swap contract (the Swap) to receive variable rate 6-month LIBOR interest and pay 4.15% fixed rate interest, which when combined with the 5.75% margin, results in a fixed rate of 9.9% on the FR Notes through January 31, 2008. The Swap interest payments are made semi-annually, beginning with the first payment on February 1, 2006. The Swap matures on January 31, 2008. In fiscal year 2005, the Company deposited $1.0 million as collateral for the Swap; the amount of collateral fluctuates based on the fair value of the Swap. In fiscal year 2006, the Company received a $0.5 million refund of the Swap collateral. The Swap collateral remaining is reported as Prepaid and Other Current Assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 30, 2007, and as Other Long-term Assets as of September 29, 2006. The unrealized gains and losses from the Swap are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The ineffective portion of the Swap was not significant, and the interest rate swap gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. At March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, the fair value of the Swap was an asset of $0.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and the unrealized gain, net of related tax expense, was $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
The Companys effective tax rate was approximately 37% and 44% for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 and 2006, respectively. The lower effective income tax rate in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was primarily due to a change in filing position that was made in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 as a result of foreign income tax planning activities, discrete tax benefits related to prior year foreign tax filings and lower effective income tax rates in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 in certain foreign jurisdictions primarily due to decreases in the Canadian statutory tax rates. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 included a $0.3 million charge attributable to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 consisting of $0.5 million to correct the overstatement of tax benefits recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 for stock-based compensation expense that is not deductible for income tax purposes in a foreign tax jurisdiction, offset by reversal of a $0.2 million tax contingency reserve that was no longer required. Without the correction to the overstatement of tax benefits, the Companys effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 would have been approximately 41%.
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and dilutive potential common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Potential common equivalent shares consist of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method.
19
The following table is a reconciliation of the shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic |
|
16,253,522 |
|
13,078,954 |
|
16,161,149 |
|
13,078,954 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock awards |
|
1,476,796 |
|
1,705,993 |
|
1,485,308 |
|
1,697,560 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted |
|
17,730,318 |
|
14,784,947 |
|
17,646,457 |
|
14,776,514 |
|
As further discussed in Note 4, on April 7, 2006, in connection with the amendment and restatement of its certificate of incorporation, the Company effected a 3.059-to-1 split of its outstanding shares of common stock as of such date. All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect this stock split.
The Companys reportable segments are VED and satcom equipment. The VED segment develops, manufactures and distributes high power/high frequency microwave and radio frequency signal components. The satcom equipment segment manufactures and supplies high power amplifiers and networks for satellite communication uplink and industrial applications. Segment information reported below is consistent with the manner in which it is reviewed and evaluated by the Companys chief operating decision maker, its chief executive officer, and is based on the nature of the Companys operations and products offered to customers.
Summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable segments is shown in the following tables:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||||
Sales from external customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
VED |
|
$ |
72,216 |
|
$ |
69,597 |
|
$ |
139,191 |
|
$ |
132,793 |
|
Satcom equipment |
|
16,228 |
|
17,332 |
|
32,976 |
|
36,515 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
88,444 |
|
$ |
86,929 |
|
$ |
172,167 |
|
$ |
169,308 |
|
Intersegment product transfers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
VED |
|
$ |
4,582 |
|
$ |
6,476 |
|
$ |
9,705 |
|
$ |
12,684 |
|
Satcom equipment |
|
9 |
|
2 |
|
9 |
|
2 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
4,591 |
|
$ |
6,478 |
|
$ |
9,714 |
|
$ |
12,686 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
VED |
|
$ |
17,932 |
|
$ |
17,396 |
|
$ |
35,516 |
|
$ |
33,461 |
|
Satcom equipment |
|
1,121 |
|
1,961 |
|
2,618 |
|
4,852 |
|
||||
Other |
|
(2,743 |
) |
(3,304 |
) |
(4,739 |
) |
(9,745 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
16,310 |
|
$ |
16,053 |
|
$ |
33,395 |
|
$ |
28,568 |
|
20
Amounts not reported as VED or satcom equipment are reported as other. Other consists primarily of corporate operating expenses and certain other expenses that are managed by the corporate organization, such as business combination-related expenses, share-based compensation expense, and certain non-recurring or unusual expenses. The first six months of fiscal year 2006 included non-recurring expenses for a special bonus of $3.25 million and expenses of $2.5 million related to the relocation of the Companys Eimac operations from its former San Carlos, California facility to its nearby Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California facilities. The special bonus was paid to employees and directors (other than directors who are employees or affiliates of Cypress) to reward them for the increase in Company value.
EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, the Company believes that GAAP-based financial information for leveraged businesses such as the Companys business should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand the Companys financial performance in connection with their analysis of the Companys business:
· EBITDA is a component of the measures used by the Companys board of directors and management team to evaluate the Companys operating performance;
· the Senior Credit Facility contains covenants that require the Company to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and the Companys management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;
· EBITDA is a component of the measures used by the Companys management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;
· EBITDA facilitates comparisons between the Companys operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the Companys management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors results and the Companys industry in general; and
· the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by the Company of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.
Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, the Companys measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although the Company uses EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of its business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate the Companys business. When analyzing the Companys performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.
21
The following table reconciles net income to EBITDA:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,760 |
|
$ |
4,345 |
|
$ |
11,595 |
|
$ |
6,560 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,188 |
|
2,295 |
|
4,382 |
|
4,451 |
|
||||
Interest expense, net |
|
5,275 |
|
6,400 |
|
10,614 |
|
12,464 |
|
||||
Income tax expense |
|
3,087 |
|
3,013 |
|
6,804 |
|
5,093 |
|
||||
EBITDA |
|
$ |
16,310 |
|
$ |
16,053 |
|
$ |
33,395 |
|
$ |
28,568 |
|
Geographic sales by customer location were as follows for external customers:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
||||
United States |
|
$ |
52,577 |
|
$ |
57,207 |
|
$ |
102,081 |
|
$ |
108,207 |
|
All foreign countries |
|
35,867 |
|
29,722 |
|
70,086 |
|
61,101 |
|
||||
Total sales |
|
$ |
88,444 |
|
$ |
86,929 |
|
$ |
172,167 |
|
$ |
169,308 |
|
Net property, plant and equipment by geographic area was as follows:
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
September 29, 2006 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Property, |
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Property, |
|
||||||
United States |
|
$ |
66,154 |
|
$ |
(13,995 |
) |
$ |
52,159 |
|
$ |
64,527 |
|
$ |
(11,221 |
) |
$ |
53,306 |
|
Canada |
|
15,534 |
|
(1,763 |
) |
13,771 |
|
11,915 |
|
(1,440 |
) |
10,475 |
|
||||||
Other |
|
175 |
|
(127 |
) |
48 |
|
177 |
|
(107 |
) |
70 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
81,863 |
|
$ |
(15,885 |
) |
$ |
65,978 |
|
$ |
76,619 |
|
$ |
(12,768 |
) |
$ |
63,851 |
|
The United States Government is the only customer that accounted for 10% or more of the Companys consolidated sales in the first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006. Direct sales to the United States Government were $29.0 million and $27.8 million for first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer represented 14% of consolidated accounts receivable as of March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006.
There were no individual foreign countries with sales greater than 10% of total sales for the periods presented.
In February 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the land and close its facilities located in San Carlos, California to consolidate the Companys Eimac operations into the Companys existing facility in nearby Palo Alto, California. In September 2006, the sale was completed. The aggregate sales proceeds were $24.8 million, of which $11.3 million was received in September 2006 and $13.5 million was received as advance payments in fiscal 2004. The Company had total selling costs of
22
$1.3 million related to the sale of the San Carlos property. The aggregate sales proceeds of $24.8 million less the related selling costs of $1.3 million, offset by the land and buildings net book value of approximately $23.5 million, resulted in no gain or loss on the sale.
In December 2005, the Board of Directors declared and paid a special cash dividend to stockholders of $17.0 million. This dividend was paid using (a) the $10.0 million in net proceeds obtained from the additional borrowing under the Senior Credit Facility in connection with the December 2005 amendment thereto, and (b) available cash.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation 48, Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties (FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as more-likely-than-not to be sustained by the taxing authority. The recently issued literature also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. FIN 48 also includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Any differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company will be required to adopt FIN 48 in fiscal year 2008 and is currently in the process of determining the impact, if any, of adopting the provisions of FIN 48 on its financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under other accounting pronouncements that permit or require fair value measurements, changes the methods used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In particular, disclosures are required to provide information on: the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities; the inputs used to develop measurements; and the effect of certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets). SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption, as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year, is also permitted, provided interim financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 157 in fiscal year 2008 and is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. Under SFAS No. 158, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs or credits that have not yet been recognized through earnings as net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 is effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 and shall not be applied retrospectively. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 158 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
23
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 provides guidance on how prior year misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. SAB No. 108 does not change the guidance in SAB No. 99, Materiality, when evaluating the materiality of misstatements. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. Upon initial application, SAB No. 108 permits a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. The Company will be required to adopt SAB No. 108 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and believes at this time that the adoption of SAB No. 108 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to provide opportunities to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
On January 23, 2004, CPI issued $125.0 million of 8% Notes that are guaranteed by CPI International and all of CPIs domestic subsidiaries. Separate financial statements of the guarantors are not presented because (i) the guarantors are wholly-owned and have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 8% Notes on a joint and several basis and (ii) the Companys management has determined that such separate financial statements are not material to investors. Instead, presented below are the consolidating financial statements of: (a) the parent or CPI International, (b) the issuer, CPI, (c) the guarantor subsidiaries (all of the domestic subsidiaries), (d) the non-guarantor subsidiaries, (e) the consolidating elimination entries, and (f) the consolidated totals. The accompanying consolidating financial information should be read in connection with the condensed consolidated financial statements of CPI International.
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for based on the equity method. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries, intercompany balances, intercompany transactions and intercompany sales.
24
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of March 30, 2007
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
516 |
|
$ |
25,113 |
|
$ |
508 |
|
$ |
1,468 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
27,605 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
777 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
24,103 |
|
8,048 |
|
15,142 |
|
|
|
47,293 |
|
||||||
Inventories |
|
|
|
38,825 |
|
2,539 |
|
16,197 |
|
(651 |
) |
56,910 |
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
10,954 |
|
3 |
|
865 |
|
(262 |
) |
11,560 |
|
||||||
Intercompany receivable |
|
|
|
27,631 |
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
(29,586 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
1,239 |
|
1,622 |
|
331 |
|
729 |
|
(263 |
) |
3,658 |
|
||||||
Total current assets |
|
1,755 |
|
128,248 |
|
14,544 |
|
35,178 |
|
(30,762 |
) |
148,963 |
|
||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
49,327 |
|
2,845 |
|
13,806 |
|
|
|
65,978 |
|
||||||
Deferred debt issue costs, net |
|
3,010 |
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,917 |
|
||||||
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
59,107 |
|
6,590 |
|
8,571 |
|
|
|
74,268 |
|
||||||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
93,160 |
|
5,848 |
|
48,263 |
|
|
|
147,271 |
|
||||||
Other long-term assets |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558 |
|
||||||
Intercompany notes receivable |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
219,037 |
|
61,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
(280,826 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
223,802 |
|
$ |
399,131 |
|
$ |
29,827 |
|
$ |
105,818 |
|
$ |
(312,623 |
) |
$ |
445,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
192 |
|
$ |
12,535 |
|
$ |
554 |
|
$ |
7,348 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
20,629 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
1,320 |
|
16,239 |
|
702 |
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
23,312 |
|
||||||
Product warranty |
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
225 |
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
5,525 |
|
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
5,934 |
|
(263 |
) |
6,050 |
|
||||||
Advance payments from customers |
|
|
|
2,865 |
|
1,519 |
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
6,017 |
|
||||||
Intercompany payable |
|
28,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
(29,586 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Total current liabilities |
|
30,170 |
|
34,798 |
|
3,379 |
|
23,297 |
|
(30,111 |
) |
61,533 |
|
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
23,813 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
29,613 |
|
||||||
Intercompany notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
79,308 |
|
162,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,808 |
|
||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
||||||
Total liabilities |
|
109,478 |
|
221,171 |
|
3,379 |
|
30,132 |
|
(31,146 |
) |
333,014 |
|
||||||
Common stock |
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
||||||
Parent investment |
|
|
|
120,610 |
|
22,228 |
|
57,632 |
|
(200,470 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
67,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,371 |
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
273 |
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
249 |
|
273 |
|
||||||
Retained earnings |
|
46,517 |
|
57,504 |
|
4,220 |
|
18,149 |
|
(81,256 |
) |
45,134 |
|
||||||
Net stockholders equity |
|
114,324 |
|
177,960 |
|
26,448 |
|
75,686 |
|
(281,477 |
) |
112,941 |
|
||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
223,802 |
|
$ |
399,131 |
|
$ |
29,827 |
|
$ |
105,818 |
|
$ |
(312,623 |
) |
$ |
445,955 |
|
25
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of September 29, 2006
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
139 |
|
$ |
28,299 |
|
$ |
290 |
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30,153 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
941 |
|
805 |
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
22,642 |
|
7,132 |
|
13,854 |
|
|
|
43,628 |
|
||||||
Inventories |
|
|
|
34,659 |
|
2,215 |
|
18,540 |
|
(1,383 |
) |
54,031 |
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
10,703 |
|
3 |
|
814 |
|
|
|
11,520 |
|
||||||
Intercompany receivable |
|
|
|
27,988 |
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
(30,736 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
887 |
|
1,238 |
|
165 |
|
790 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
||||||
Total current assets |
|
1,026 |
|
125,529 |
|
13,494 |
|
36,228 |
|
(32,119 |
) |
144,158 |
|
||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
50,344 |
|
2,982 |
|
10,525 |
|
|
|
63,851 |
|
||||||
Deferred debt issue costs, net |
|
3,123 |
|
6,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,644 |
|
||||||
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
59,901 |
|
6,715 |
|
8,873 |
|
|
|
75,489 |
|
||||||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
93,378 |
|
5,848 |
|
48,263 |
|
|
|
147,489 |
|
||||||
Other long-term assets |
|
731 |
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
||||||
Intercompany notes receivable |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
204,778 |
|
55,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
(260,025 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
209,658 |
|
$ |
392,352 |
|
$ |
29,039 |
|
$ |
103,889 |
|
$ |
(293,179 |
) |
$ |
441,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
199 |
|
9,667 |
|
490 |
|
8,745 |
|
|
|
19,101 |
|
||||||
Accrued expenses |
|
1,298 |
|
16,130 |
|
921 |
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
23,269 |
|
||||||
Product warranty |
|
|
|
3,506 |
|
204 |
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
5,958 |
|
||||||
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
4,778 |
|
204 |
|
5,711 |
|
|
|
10,693 |
|
||||||
Advance payments from customers |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
909 |
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
6,310 |
|
||||||
Intercompany payable |
|
27,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
(30,736 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Total current liabilities |
|
29,241 |
|
39,246 |
|
2,728 |
|
26,566 |
|
(30,736 |
) |
67,045 |
|
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
447 |
|
23,578 |
|
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
29,933 |
|
||||||
Intercompany notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
79,281 |
|
165,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,067 |
|
||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
||||||
Total liabilities |
|
108,969 |
|
228,651 |
|
2,728 |
|
33,509 |
|
(31,771 |
) |
342,086 |
|
||||||
Common stock |
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
||||||
Parent investment |
|
|
|
120,705 |
|
22,228 |
|
57,536 |
|
(200,469 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
65,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,295 |
|
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
679 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
15 |
|
679 |
|
||||||
Retained earnings |
|
34,555 |
|
42,988 |
|
4,083 |
|
12,867 |
|
(60,954 |
) |
33,539 |
|
||||||
Net stockholders equity |
|
100,689 |
|
163,701 |
|
26,311 |
|
70,380 |
|
(261,408 |
) |
99,673 |
|
||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
209,658 |
|
$ |
392,352 |
|
$ |
29,039 |
|
$ |
103,889 |
|
$ |
(293,179 |
) |
$ |
441,759 |
|
26
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Quarter Ended March 30, 2007
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
56,666 |
|
$ |
16,351 |
|
$ |
34,143 |
|
$ |
(18,716 |
) |
$ |
88,444 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
40,211 |
|
13,642 |
|
26,255 |
|
(19,369 |
) |
60,739 |
|
||||||
Gross profit |
|
|
|
16,455 |
|
2,709 |
|
7,888 |
|
653 |
|
27,705 |
|
||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Research and development |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
||||||
Selling and marketing |
|
|
|
2,015 |
|
869 |
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
4,799 |
|
||||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
4,402 |
|
515 |
|
929 |
|
|
|
5,846 |
|
||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
|
|
334 |
|
62 |
|
150 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
||||||
Net loss on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
1,446 |
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
13,583 |
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
8,785 |
|
1,263 |
|
3,421 |
|
653 |
|
14,122 |
|
||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
|
2,072 |
|
3,328 |
|
(9 |
) |
(116 |
) |
|
|
5,275 |
|
||||||
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
(2,072 |
) |
5,457 |
|
1,272 |
|
3,537 |
|
653 |
|
8,847 |
|
||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
(787 |
) |
2,650 |
|
356 |
|
868 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
||||||
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
7,045 |
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
(11,283 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,760 |
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
$ |
916 |
|
$ |
2,669 |
|
$ |
(10,630 |
) |
$ |
5,760 |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
56,580 |
|
$ |
16,101 |
|
$ |
34,148 |
|
$ |
(19,900 |
) |
$ |
86,929 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
42,238 |
|
13,241 |
|
25,797 |
|
(20,091 |
) |
61,185 |
|
||||||
Gross profit |
|
|
|
14,342 |
|
2,860 |
|
8,351 |
|
191 |
|
25,744 |
|
||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Research and development |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
||||||
Selling and marketing |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
974 |
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
4,680 |
|
||||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
435 |
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
4,676 |
|
||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
|
|
334 |
|
62 |
|
150 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
||||||
Net loss on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
5,036 |
|
1,471 |
|
5,479 |
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
9,306 |
|
1,389 |
|
2,872 |
|
191 |
|
13,758 |
|
||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
|
2,052 |
|
4,339 |
|
(4 |
) |
13 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
||||||
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
(2,052 |
) |
4,967 |
|
1,393 |
|
2,859 |
|
191 |
|
7,358 |
|
||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
(821 |
) |
2,539 |
|
390 |
|
905 |
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
||||||
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
5,576 |
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,724 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,345 |
|
$ |
5,576 |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
$ |
(8,533 |
) |
$ |
4,345 |
|
27
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended March 30, 2007
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
108,031 |
|
$ |
30,931 |
|
$ |
68,686 |
|
$ |
(35,481 |
) |
$ |
172,167 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
75,706 |
|
25,707 |
|
52,681 |
|
(36,213 |
) |
117,881 |
|
||||||
Gross profit |
|
|
|
32,325 |
|
5,224 |
|
16,005 |
|
732 |
|
54,286 |
|
||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Research and development |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
||||||
Selling and marketing |
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
1,698 |
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
9,628 |
|
||||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
8,093 |
|
722 |
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
|
|
668 |
|
125 |
|
301 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
||||||
Net loss on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
14,307 |
|
2,545 |
|
8,421 |
|
|
|
25,273 |
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
18,018 |
|
2,679 |
|
7,584 |
|
732 |
|
29,013 |
|
||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
|
4,120 |
|
6,619 |
|
(15 |
) |
(110 |
) |
|
|
10,614 |
|
||||||
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
(4,120 |
) |
11,399 |
|
2,694 |
|
7,694 |
|
732 |
|
18,399 |
|
||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
(1,566 |
) |
5,221 |
|
737 |
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
||||||
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
14,149 |
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
(22,120 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
11,595 |
|
$ |
14,149 |
|
$ |
1,957 |
|
$ |
5,282 |
|
$ |
(21,388 |
) |
$ |
11,595 |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
108,583 |
|
$ |
29,042 |
|
$ |
68,956 |
|
$ |
(37,273 |
) |
$ |
169,308 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
80,526 |
|
23,942 |
|
51,266 |
|
(37,378 |
) |
118,356 |
|
||||||
Gross profit |
|
|
|
28,057 |
|
5,100 |
|
17,690 |
|
105 |
|
50,952 |
|
||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Research and development |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
3,851 |
|
||||||
Selling and marketing |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
1,843 |
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
9,704 |
|
||||||
General and administrative |
|
|
|
6,570 |
|
734 |
|
4,674 |
|
|
|
11,978 |
|
||||||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
|
|
668 |
|
125 |
|
301 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
||||||
Net loss on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
13,194 |
|
2,702 |
|
10,939 |
|
|
|
26,835 |
|
||||||
Operating income |
|
|
|
14,863 |
|
2,398 |
|
6,751 |
|
105 |
|
24,117 |
|
||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
|
4,100 |
|
8,346 |
|
(9 |
) |
27 |
|
|
|
12,464 |
|
||||||
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
(4,100 |
) |
6,517 |
|
2,407 |
|
6,724 |
|
105 |
|
11,653 |
|
||||||
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
(1,640 |
) |
3,779 |
|
696 |
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
||||||
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
9,020 |
|
6,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
(15,302 |
) |
|
|
||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
6,560 |
|
$ |
9,020 |
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
$ |
4,466 |
|
$ |
(15,197 |
) |
$ |
6,560 |
|
28
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended March 30, 2007
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(563 |
) |
$ |
2,888 |
|
$ |
239 |
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6,299 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(3,692 |
) |
|
|
(5,347 |
) |
||||||
Capitalized expenses relating to potential business acquisition |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
(1,753 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(3,692 |
) |
|
|
(5,466 |
) |
||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Repayments of debt |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees |
|
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398 |
|
||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542 |
|
||||||
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
940 |
|
(4,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,381 |
) |
||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
377 |
|
(3,186 |
) |
218 |
|
43 |
|
|
|
(2,548 |
) |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
139 |
|
28,299 |
|
290 |
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
30,153 |
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
516 |
|
$ |
25,113 |
|
$ |
508 |
|
$ |
1,468 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
27,605 |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Parent |
|
Issuer |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(2,116 |
) |
$ |
(4,158 |
) |
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(4,515 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Expenses relating to sale of San Carlos property |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
||||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
(5,009 |
) |
(79 |
) |
(729 |
) |
|
|
(5,817 |
) |
||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
(5,013 |
) |
(79 |
) |
(729 |
) |
|
|
(5,821 |
) |
||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
||||||
Payment of IPO financiing costs |
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
||||||
Stockholder distribution payments |
|
(17,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,000 |
) |
||||||
Intercompany dividends |
|
20,459 |
|
(20,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
2,085 |
|
(10,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,374 |
) |
||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(31 |
) |
(19,630 |
) |
(57 |
) |
1,008 |
|
|
|
(18,710 |
) |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
33 |
|
25,528 |
|
323 |
|
627 |
|
|
|
26,511 |
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
5,898 |
|
$ |
266 |
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
7,801 |
|
29
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our fiscal years are the 52- or 53-week periods that end on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2007 comprises the 52-week period ending September 28, 2007 and fiscal year 2006 comprised the 52-week period ended September 29, 2006. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, of CPI International, Inc.
Overview
CPI International, Inc., headquartered in Palo Alto, California, is the parent company of Communications & Power Industries, Inc., a leading provider of microwave, radio frequency, power and control solutions for critical defense, communications, medical, scientific and other applications. Communications & Power Industries, Inc. develops, manufactures and distributes products used to generate, amplify and transmit high-power/high-frequency microwave and radio frequency signals and/or provide power and control for various applications. End-use applications of these systems include the transmission of radar signals for navigation and location; transmission of deception signals for electronic countermeasures; transmission and amplification of voice, data and video signals for broadcasting, Internet and other types of communications; providing power and control for medical diagnostic imaging; and generating microwave energy for radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer and for various industrial and scientific applications.
Unless the context otherwise requires, CPI International means CPI International, Inc., and CPI means Communications & Power Industries, Inc. CPI is a direct subsidiary of CPI International. CPI International is a holding company with no operations of its own. The terms we, us, our and the Company refer to CPI International and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Eimac Relocation
We began the relocation of our Eimac operations (Eimac) from our former San Carlos, California facility to our nearby Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California facilities during fiscal year 2005. On June 1, 2006, we made organizational changes and consolidated the operating activities of Eimac into our Microwave Power Products division, which also operates in our Palo Alto facility. The integration of Eimac into our Palo Alto operations was completed in January 2007.
As part of this relocation, Eimac experienced planned manufacturing disruptions stemming from the decommissioning of our production equipment in San Carlos and the required reconfiguration, installation and testing of that equipment prior to production readiness in Palo Alto. During fiscal year 2005, in anticipation of these planned disruptions, customers accelerated the placement of orders with Eimac. This order acceleration in fiscal year 2005, and the subsequent acceleration of product shipments, caused a reduction of customers demand requirements from Eimac during the first half of fiscal year 2006, particularly in our medical, communications and industrial markets.
The Eimac relocation negatively impacted Eimac orders and sales for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2007. During the first six months of fiscal year 2006, we incurred move related expenses and Eimac experienced unfavorable overhead absorption and manufacturing variances due to the reduction in sales volume and relocation disruptions. By the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, orders and sales rates for Eimac had recovered to near their historical levels.
30
Orders
We sell our products into six end markets: radar, electronic warfare, medical, communications, industrial and scientific.
Our customer sales contracts are recorded as orders when we accept written customer purchase orders or contracts. Customer purchase orders with an undefined delivery schedule, or blanket purchase orders, are not reported as orders until the delivery date is determined. Our government sales contracts are not reported as orders until we have been notified that the contract has been funded. Total orders for a fiscal period represent the total dollar amount of customer orders recorded by us during the fiscal period, reduced by the dollar amount of any order cancellations or terminations during the fiscal period.
Our orders by market for the first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
% of Orders |
|
Amount |
|
% of Orders |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Radar |
|
$ |
66.7 |
|
36 |
% |
$ |
64.3 |
|
37 |
% |
$ |
2.4 |
|
4 |
% |
Electronic Warfare |
|
9.6 |
|
5 |
|
9.7 |
|
6 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|||
Medical |
|
36.8 |
|
20 |
|
33.7 |
|
20 |
|
3.1 |
|
9 |
|
|||
Communications |
|
54.6 |
|
30 |
|
52.1 |
|
30 |
|
2.5 |
|
5 |
|
|||
Industrial |
|
10.6 |
|
6 |
|
9.7 |
|
6 |
|
0.9 |
|
9 |
|
|||
Scientific |
|
5.9 |
|
3 |
|
2.6 |
|
1 |
|
3.3 |
|
127 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
184.2 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
172.1 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
12.1 |
|
7 |
% |
Explanations for the order increase or decrease by market for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006 are as follows:
· Radar and Electronic Warfare: The majority of our sales in the radar and electronic warfare markets are for products for domestic and international defense and government end uses. Orders in these markets are characterized by many smaller orders in the $0.5 million to $3.0 million range by product or program. On a combined basis, orders for the radar and electronic warfare markets increased from an aggregate of $74.0 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to an aggregate of $76.3 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2007. This approximate 3% overall increase in orders for these markets on a combined basis is consistent with our expectations of overall low single digit percentage average long-term annual growth in these markets taken on a combined basis.
· Medical: The increase in medical orders from the first six months of fiscal year 2006 to the first six months of fiscal year 2007 resulted from continued increases in orders for our magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) products due to growth in the number of MRI systems on which we have products, increases in orders for products used in radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer and increases in orders for our x-ray generators due to growth in the overall market and our share of this market. These increases were partially offset by a period-over-period decrease due to a change in the timing of booking orders for x-ray generators for a large customer. Previously, we booked orders for x-ray generators for
31
this customer on a quarterly basis, but as of September 2006, we began to book orders for this customer on an annual basis. As a result of this timing change, orders for x-ray generators for this customer decreased $1.4 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The annual order we booked in September 2006 was the largest order we had ever received from this customer for our medical imaging products.
· Communications: The increase in communications orders was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million increase in orders to mostly foreign customers for newer types of amplifiers used for news gathering and mobile applications. In addition, the first six months of fiscal year 2007, in comparison to the first six months of fiscal year 2006, included a $1.4 million increase in orders for our traditional amplifiers for U.S. and foreign broadcast network applications, as well as foreign direct-to-home broadcast applications. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in orders for our newer types of amplifiers for certain programs for North American direct-to-home broadcast and military satellite communications applications, due to the timing of orders for these programs.
· Industrial: Orders in the industrial market, one of our smallest markets, are cyclical and generally reflect the performance of the overall economy. The increase in industrial orders was primarily attributable to the timing of orders for products used in the dielectric heating, instrumentation and semiconductor markets.
· Scientific: Orders in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period. The increase in scientific orders was primarily the result of orders for products for the Spallation Neutron Source at Oakridge National Laboratory.
Incoming order levels fluctuate significantly on a quarterly or annual basis, and a particular quarters or years order rate may not be indicative of future order levels. In addition, our sales are highly dependent upon manufacturing scheduling and performance and, accordingly, it is not possible to accurately predict when orders will be recognized as sales.
Backlog
As of March 30, 2007, we had an order backlog of $200.7 million compared to an order backlog of $197.7 million as of March 31, 2006. Backlog represents the cumulative balance, at a given point in time, of recorded customer sales orders that have not yet been shipped or recognized as sales. Backlog is increased when an order is received, and backlog is decreased when we recognize sales. We believe backlog and orders information is helpful to investors because this information may be indicative of future sales results. Although backlog consists of firm orders for which goods and services are yet to be provided, customers can, and sometimes do, terminate or modify these orders. However, historically the amount of modifications and terminations has not been material compared to total contract volume.
Results of Operations
We derive our revenue primarily from the sale of microwave and radio frequency products, including high-power microwave amplifiers, satellite communications amplifiers, medical x-ray imaging subsystems, and other related products. Our products generally have selling prices ranging from $2,000 to $100,000, with certain limited products priced up to $1,000,000.
Cost of goods sold generally includes costs for raw materials, manufacturing costs, including allocation of overhead and other indirect costs, charges for reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, warranty claims and losses on fixed price contracts. Operating expenses generally consist of research and development, selling and marketing and general and administrative expenses.
32
Quarter Ended March 30, 2007 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
The following table sets forth our historical results of operations for each of the periods indicated (dollars in millions):
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
% of Sales |
|
Amount |
|
% of Sales |
|
||
Sales |
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
86.9 |
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
60.7 |
|
68.7 |
|
61.2 |
|
70.4 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
27.7 |
|
31.3 |
|
25.7 |
|
29.6 |
|
||
Research and development |
|
2.4 |
|
2.7 |
|
1.9 |
|
2.2 |
|
||
Selling and marketing |
|
4.8 |
|
5.4 |
|
4.7 |
|
5.4 |
|
||
General and administrative |
|
5.8 |
|
6.6 |
|
4.7 |
|
5.4 |
|
||
Amortization of acquisition- related intangibles |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
||
Net loss on disposition of assets |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Operating income |
|
14.1 |
|
16.0 |
|
13.8 |
|
15.9 |
|
||
Interest expense, net |
|
5.3 |
|
6.0 |
|
6.4 |
|
7.4 |
|
||
Income before taxes |
|
8.8 |
|
10.0 |
|
7.4 |
|
8.5 |
|
||
Income tax expense |
|
3.1 |
|
3.5 |
|
3.0 |
|
3.5 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
6.6 |
% |
$ |
4.3 |
|
5.0 |
% |
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EBITDA (a) |
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
18.4 |
% |
$ |
16.1 |
|
18.5 |
% |
Note: Totals may not equal the sum of the component line items due to independent rounding. Percentages are calculated based on rounded dollar amounts presented.
(a) EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:
· EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;
· our senior credit facilities contain covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;
· EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;
· EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors results and our industry in general; and
· the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.
Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to
33
operate our business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.
For a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income, see Note 9 of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Sales: Our sales by market for the second quarter of fiscal years 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
% of Sales |
|
Amount |
|
% of Sales |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Radar |
|
$ |
29.2 |
|
33 |
% |
$ |
30.3 |
|
35 |
% |
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
(4 |
)% |
Electronic Warfare |
|
7.1 |
|
8 |
|
7.3 |
|
8 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|||
Medical |
|
17.0 |
|
19 |
|
14.1 |
|
16 |
|
2.9 |
|
21 |
|
|||
Communications |
|
27.0 |
|
31 |
|
28.6 |
|
33 |
|
(1.6 |
) |
(6 |
) |
|||
Industrial |
|
6.4 |
|
7 |
|
5.3 |
|
6 |
|
1.1 |
|
21 |
|
|||
Scientific |
|
1.7 |
|
2 |
|
1.3 |
|
2 |
|
0.4 |
|
31 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
86.9 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
1.5 |
|
2 |
% |
Sales for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 of $88.4 million were $1.5 million, or 2%, higher than sales of $86.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Explanations for the sales increase or decrease by market are as follows:
· Radar and Electronic Warfare: The majority of our sales in the radar and electronic warfare markets are for products for domestic and international defense and government end uses. On a combined basis, sales for these two markets decreased approximately 3%, due primarily to the timing of orders and sales for certain radar programs. Management believes that, on a combined basis, these markets will experience low single digit percentage average long-term annual growth.
· Medical: The 21% increase in sales of our medical imaging and radiation therapy products was due to increased sales of our products used in x-ray imaging, MRI and in radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, sales of x-ray generators to U.S. and foreign customers increased $1.1 million, including an increase of $0.8 million in sales of x-ray generators for linear accelerators for the treatment of cancer, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Shipments of our medical imaging products used in MRI also increased in comparison to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 due to an increase in sales of replacement products, or spares, resulting from growth in the number of MRI systems on which we have products. Sales of products used in radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer increased $0.7 million.
· Communications: The decrease in sales in the communications market was primarily the result of the cyclical nature of the direct-to-home broadcast applications market. Shipments of our traditional satellite communications amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications were $3.1 million lower in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 than in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Shipments of traditional amplifiers to an Indian government agency for a one-time application totaling $0.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 were not expected to, and did not, repeat during the second
34
quarter of fiscal year 2007. In addition, shipments to a foreign customer for a communications system decreased $0.6 million. These decreases were partially offset by a $3.2 million increase in shipments of our newer satellite communications products to U.S. and foreign customers, including increases in shipments of newer types of amplifiers that are also used in U.S. and foreign direct-to-home broadcast applications, U.S. military satellite communications applications and foreign satellite news gathering or mobile applications.
· Industrial: The increase in industrial sales was primarily due to increased demand for power supplies for the semiconductor market and vacuum electron devices for the dielectric heating and instrumentation markets. In addition, the timing of shipments for a foreign military aircraft test system positively impacted sales in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007.
· Scientific: Sales in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period. The primary contributor to the increase in scientific sales was an increase in product sales for various accelerator and fusion applications.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $27.7 million, or 31.3% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 as compared to $25.7 million, or 29.6% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The second quarter of fiscal year 2006 included non-recurring expenses of approximately $2.3 million for move-related expenses, including unfavorable overhead absorption and manufacturing variances, for Eimac. The second quarter of fiscal year 2007, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, was favorably impacted by higher sales and a favorable mix of products with higher gross margins and was unfavorably impacted by approximately $1.1 million due to increases in our Canadian denominated manufacturing expenses resulting from the expiration of favorable foreign currency hedge contracts in March 2006.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $2.4 million, or 2.7% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, a $0.5 million increase from $1.9 million, or 2.2% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to additional investment in the development of new medical diagnostic imaging products and vacuum electron device products for radar, electronic warfare and satellite communication markets.
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses were $4.8 million, or 5.4% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, a $0.1 million increase from the $4.7 million, or 5.4% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Selling and marketing expenses as a percent of sales for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 were similar to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $5.8 million, or 6.6% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, a $1.1 million increase from the $4.7 million, or 5.4% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 was primarily due to incremental expenses associated with meeting the compliance requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and additional expenses as a result of becoming a publicly traded company in April 2006. In addition, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 includes $0.3 million for expenses associated with the evaluation of certain potential acquisition candidates and $0.2 million for stock-based compensation expenses. The second quarter of fiscal year 2006 did not include any acquisition-related expenses or stock-based compensation expense.
35
Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles consists of purchase accounting charges for technology and other intangible assets. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles was $0.5 million for both the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 and the second quarter of fiscal year 2006.
Interest Expense, net (Interest Expense). Interest Expense of $5.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 was $1.1 million lower than interest expense of $6.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The reduction in interest expense in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to the lower debt levels resulting from term loan prepayments of $5.0 million in December 2006, and $47.5 million in May 2006 using the proceeds from the IPO of our common stock.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded an income tax provision of $3.1 million and $3.0 million for the second quarter of fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our effective tax rate was approximately 35% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 as compared to approximately 41% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The lower effective income tax rate in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 is primarily due to a change in filing position that was implemented in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 as a result of foreign income tax planning activities, discrete tax benefits related to prior year foreign tax filings and lower effective income tax rates in fiscal year 2007 in certain foreign jurisdictions, including Canada.
Net Income. Net income was $5.8 million, or 6.6% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 as compared to $4.3 million, or 5.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The increase in net income in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 was due primarily to lower interest expense, the absence of move-related expenses and the impact of a lower effective tax rate in the current quarter; offset by increases in our Canadian dollar denominated expenses in the current quarter resulting from the expiration of favorable foreign currency hedge contracts in March 2006, and higher acquisition-related and public company expenses such as for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance in fiscal year 2007.
EBITDA. EBITDA was $16.3 million, or 18.4% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 as compared to $16.1 million, or 18.5% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. The increase in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 was primarily due to the absence of move-related expenses of $2.7 million, including unfavorable overhead absorption and manufacturing variances for the Eimac relocation, higher sales and a favorable mix of products with higher gross margins in the current quarter; offset by increases of $1.4 million in our Canadian dollar denominated expenses in the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 due to the expiration of favorable foreign currency hedge contracts in March 2006, and higher acquisition-related and public company expenses such as for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance in fiscal year 2007.
36
Six Months Ended March 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2006
The following table sets forth our historical results of operations for each of the periods indicated (dollars in millions):
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
% of Sales |
|
Amount |
|
% of Sales |
|
||
Sales |
|
$ |
172.2 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
169.3 |
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales (a) |
|
117.9 |
|
68.5 |
|
118.4 |
|
69.9 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
54.3 |
|
31.5 |
|
51.0 |
|
30.1 |
|
||
Research and development |
|
4.2 |
|
2.4 |
|
3.9 |
|
2.3 |
|
||
Selling and marketing (a) |
|
9.6 |
|
5.6 |
|
9.7 |
|
5.7 |
|
||
General and administrative (a) |
|
10.3 |
|
6.0 |
|
12.0 |
|
7.1 |
|
||
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles |
|
1.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.6 |
|
||
Net loss on disposition of assets |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Operating income |
|
29.0 |
|
16.8 |
|
24.1 |
|
14.2 |
|
||
Interest expense, net |
|
10.6 |
|
6.2 |
|
12.5 |
|
7.4 |
|
||
Income before taxes |
|
18.4 |
|
10.7 |
|
11.7 |
|
6.9 |
|
||
Income tax expense |
|
6.8 |
|
3.9 |
|
5.1 |
|
3.0 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
6.7 |
% |
$ |
6.6 |
|
3.9 |
% |
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EBITDA (b) |
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
19.4 |
% |
$ |
28.6 |
|
16.9 |
% |
Note: Totals may not equal the sum of the component line items due to independent rounding. Percentages are calculated based on rounded dollar amounts presented.
(a) The six months ended March 31, 2006 includes a special bonus expense (see Special Bonus below) of $3.25 million, allocated as follows: $0.3 million to cost of sales, $0.2 million to selling and marketing and $2.75 million to general and administrative.
(b) EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:
· EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;
· our senior credit facilities contain covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;
· EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;
· EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors results and our industry in general; and
· the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.
Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business,
37
the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate our business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.
For a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income, see Note 9 of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Sales: Our sales by market for the first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
March 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
% of Orders |
|
Amount |
|
% of Orders |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Radar |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
33 |
% |
$ |
58.0 |
|
34 |
% |
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
(1 |
)% |
Electronic Warfare |
|
12.9 |
|
7 |
|
13.0 |
|
8 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|||
Medical |
|
34.1 |
|
20 |
|
27.3 |
|
16 |
|
6.8 |
|
25 |
|
|||
Communications |
|
53.1 |
|
31 |
|
58.7 |
|
35 |
|
(5.6 |
) |
(10 |
) |
|||
Industrial |
|
11.4 |
|
7 |
|
9.7 |
|
6 |
|
1.7 |
|
18 |
|
|||
Scientific |
|
3.3 |
|
2 |
|
2.6 |
|
1 |
|
0.7 |
|
27 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
172.2 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
169.3 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
2.9 |
|
2 |
% |
Sales for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 of $172.2 million were $2.9 million, or 2%, higher than sales of $169.3 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Explanations for the sales increase or decrease by market are as follows:
· Radar and Electronic Warfare: The majority of our sales in the radar and electronic warfare markets are for products for domestic and international defense and government end uses. On a combined basis, sales for these two markets decreased slightly, totaling an aggregate of $71.0 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2006, as compared to an aggregate of $70.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. The slight decline in combined sales was due primarily to the timing of orders and sales for certain radar programs. Management believes that, on a combined basis, these markets will experience low-to-mid single digit percentage average long-term annual growth.
· Medical: The 25% increase in sales of our medical imaging and radiation therapy products was primarily due to increased sales of our products used in MRI and in x-ray imaging. In the first six months of fiscal year 2007, as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006, sales of products used in MRI increased $2.3 million due to an increase in sales of replacement products, or spares, resulting from to growth in the number of MRI systems on which we have products. Sales of x-ray generators to U.S. and foreign customers increased $3.6 million, including a $2.0 million increase in sales of x-ray generators for the treatment of cancer.
· Communications: The decrease in sales in the communications market was primarily the result of the cyclical nature of the direct-to-home broadcast applications market. Shipments of traditional satellite communications amplifiers for North American direct-to-home broadcast applications were $9.2 million lower in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 than in the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Shipments of $1.3 million in satellite communications amplifiers to an Indian government agency for a one-time application in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 did not recur in the first six months
38
of fiscal year 2007. In addition, shipments for U.S. and foreign military communications programs decreased $1.1 million and shipments to a foreign customer decreased $0.8 million; these decreases were due to purchases made for these programs in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 that have provided these programs with sufficient stores of our products for the time being. These decreases were partially offset by a $6.8 million increase in shipments of our newer satellite communications products to U.S. and foreign customers for various programs, including foreign satellite news gathering or mobile applications, direct-to-home broadcast applications and military satellite communications applications. These newer satellite communications products for the direct-to-home broadcast and military satellite communications applications were for the 30 gigahertz frequency band, or Ka-band, which is projected to be one of the major new satellite communications growth areas for both commercial and military applications.
· Industrial: The increase in industrial sales was primarily due to increased demand for power supplies for the semiconductor market and for vacuum electron devices for the dielectric heating and instrumentation markets.
· Scientific: Sales in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period. The increase in sales in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 in comparison to the first six months of fiscal year 2006 was due to increased activity on a variety of scientific programs.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $54.3 million, or 31.5% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 as compared to $51.0 million, or 30.1% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The first six months of fiscal year 2006 included non-recurring expenses of approximately $3.8 million for move-related expenses, including unfavorable overhead absorption and manufacturing variances, for Eimac. The first six months of fiscal year 2007, as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006, were favorably impacted by higher sales and a favorable mix of products with higher gross margins and were unfavorably impacted by approximately $2.2 million due to increases in our Canadian denominated manufacturing expenses resulting from the expiration of favorable foreign currency hedge contracts in March 2006 and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 compared to the first six months of 2006.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $4.2 million, or 2.4% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2007, a $0.3 million increase from $3.9 million, or 2.3% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to additional investment in the growth of medical diagnostic imaging products and VED products for radar, electronic warfare and satellite communication markets. Total spending on research and development, including company-sponsored amounts charged to research and development, and customer-sponsored amounts charged to cost of sales, increased from $7.0 million, or 4.1% of sales, to $7.5 million, or 4.4% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal years 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expenses were $9.6 million, or 5.6% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2007, a $0.1 million decrease from the $9.7 million, or 5.7% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Selling and marketing expenses for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 included $0.2 million of the special bonus, discussed below.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $10.3 million, or 6.0% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2007, a $1.7 million decrease from the $12.0 million, or 7.1% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The first six months of fiscal year 2006
39
included $2.75 million of the special bonus, discussed below, and relocation expenses of $0.3 million for Eimac. The first six months of fiscal year 2007 includes incremental expenses associated with meeting the compliance requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and additional expenses as a result of becoming a publicly traded company in April 2006. In addition, general and administrative expenses for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 includes $0.5 million for expenses associated with the evaluation of certain potential acquisition candidates and $0.3 million for stock-based compensation expenses. The first six months of fiscal year 2006 did not include any acquisition-related expenses or stock-based compensation expense.
Special Bonus. On December 15, 2005, our board of directors approved the payment of $3.25 million in special, one-time bonuses to our employees and directors (other than directors who are employees or affiliates of The Cypress Group) to reward them for the increase in company value. The special bonus was not paid pursuant to our management incentive plan, our 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan or any of our other formal compensation plans. The bonus amount was not determined based on a formula, but was instead an amount determined by our board of directors to be reasonable compensation for the increase in company value. The special bonus was charged to the condensed consolidated statement of operations in the same lines as cash compensation paid to the same employees and directors, as follows: $2.75 million to General and administrative, $0.3 million to Cost of sales, and $0.2 million to Selling and marketing.
Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles consists of purchase accounting charges for technology and other intangible assets. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles was $1.1 million for both the first six months of fiscal year 2007 and the first six months of fiscal year 2006.
Interest Expense, net (Interest Expense). Interest Expense of $10.6 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was $1.9 million lower than interest expense of $12.5 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The reduction in interest expense for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to the lower debt levels resulting from term loan prepayments of $5.0 million in December 2006, and $47.5 million in May 2006 using proceeds from the IPO of our common stock.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded an income tax provision of $6.8 million and $5.1 million for the first six months of fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate was approximately 37% for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 as compared to approximately 44% for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The lower effective income tax rate in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 is primarily due to a change in filing position that was implemented in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 as a result of foreign income tax planning activities, discrete tax benefits related to prior year foreign tax filings and lower effective income tax rates in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 in certain foreign jurisdictions, including Canada.
Income tax expense for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 included $0.3 million of charges attributable to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, consisting of $0.5 million to correct the overstatement of tax benefits recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 for stock-based compensation expense that is not deductible for income tax purposes in a foreign tax jurisdiction, offset by reversal of a $0.2 million tax contingency reserve that was no longer required. Without the correction to the overstatement of tax benefits, the Companys effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 would have been approximately 41%.
40
Net Income. Net income was $11.6 million, or 6.7% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 as compared to $6.6 million, or 3.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The increase in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was primarily due to the absence in fiscal year 2007 of non-recurring expenses for the special bonus and move-related expenses, lower interest expense, higher sales and a favorable mix of products with higher gross margins in fiscal year 2007, and the impact of a lower effective tax rate; offset by increases in our Canadian denominated expenses resulting from the expiration of favorable foreign currency hedge contracts in March 2006, stock-based compensation expenses in fiscal year 2007, and higher acquisition-related and public company expenses such as for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance in fiscal year 2007.
EBITDA. EBITDA was $33.4 million, or 19.4% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 as compared to $28.6 million, or 16.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal year 2006. The increase in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 was primarily due to the absence in fiscal year 2007 of non-recurring expenses for the special bonus of $3.25 million and move-related expenses of $4.5 million, including unfavorable overhead absorption and manufacturing variances for the Eimac relocation, higher sales and a favorable mix of products with higher gross margins in fiscal year 2007; offset by increases in our Canadian denominated expenses of $2.1 million resulting from the expiration of favorable foreign currency hedge contracts in March 2006, stock-based compensation expenses in fiscal year 2007 of $0.5 million, and higher acquisition-related and public company expenses such as for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance in fiscal year 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our liquidity is affected by many factors, some of which are based on normal ongoing operations of our business and others that are related to uncertainties in the markets in which we compete and other global economic factors. We have historically financed, and intend to continue to finance, our capital and working capital requirements, including debt service and internal growth, through a combination of cash flows from our operations and borrowings under our senior credit facilities. Our primary uses of cash are cost of sales, operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditures.
As of March 30, 2007, we had $242.5 million in total principal amount of debt outstanding, compared to $247.5 million as of September 29, 2006. In addition, as of March 30, 2007, we had borrowing availability of $36.2 million under the revolver under our senior credit facilities. As of March 30, 2007, we had cash and equivalents of $27.6 million compared to $30.2 million as of September 29, 2006. Cash balances in excess of operating requirements are invested daily in overnight U.S. Government securities.
We believe that we have the financial resources to meet our business requirements for the next twelve months, including capital expenditures and working capital requirements, and to comply with the financial covenants in the documents governing our debt.
Historical Operating, Investing and Financing Activities
Operating Activities.
Operating activities provided cash of $6.3 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2007, which was attributable to net income of $11.6 million and depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges of $5.4 million, partially offset by $10.7 million for cash used for working capital. The primary uses of cash for working capital in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 were for reduction in income taxes payable of $4.6 million due primarily to income tax payments from the taxable gain on the sale of our San Carlos property in fiscal year 2006, and increases in accounts receivable of $3.7 million and inventories of $2.9 million due to the timing of customer shipments.
41
Operating activities used cash of $4.5 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2006, which was attributable to $15.7 million for cash used for working capital, partially offset by cash provided by net income of $6.6 million and depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges of $4.6 million. The primary uses of cash for working capital in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 were for increases in accounts receivable of $7.2 million and inventory of $2.5 million due to the timing of customer shipments and decreases in advance payments from customers of $5.2 million.
Investing Activities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $5.5 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 and $5.8 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2006; the primary investing activity was for capital expenditures. Capital expenditures in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 included $3.5 million for a building expansion project for our Canadian manufacturing facility. Capital expenditures for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 included $4.0 million to purchase capital equipment, building and land lease improvements related to the consolidation of Eimac into our Palo Alto facility, and $0.2 million for the building expansion project for our Canadian manufacturing facility.
Our continuing operations typically do not have large recurring capital expenditure requirements. Capital expenditures are generally made to replace existing assets, increase productivity, facilitate cost reductions or meet regulatory requirements. In fiscal year 2007, ongoing capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $4.5 million, excluding expenditures of approximately $4.5 million for completion of the Canadian facility expansion, of which $3.5 million was incurred in the first six months of fiscal year 2007.
Financing Activities.
Net cash used in financing activities was $3.4 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2007, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $8.4 million for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. Financing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2007 consisted primarily of a $5.0 million term loan repayment in December 2006 using available operating cash; partially offset by proceeds of $0.5 million from the exercise of stock options and $0.4 million from the purchase of shares under our employee stock purchase plan, and $0.7 million of excess tax benefits from stock option exercises. The $5.0 million term loan repayment included a $1.7 million required annual ECF prepayment, described below, for fiscal year 2006 and an optional prepayment of $3.3 million.
For the first six months of fiscal year 2006, CPI used the $10 million proceeds of the additional term loan borrowing to pay a dividend to CPI International Inc. to fund a portion of a special cash dividend of $17 million paid by CPI International, Inc. to the holders of its common stock on December 15, 2005. The remainder of the dividend was financed from cash on hand.
Our senior credit facilities require an annual prepayment to be made within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year based on a calculation of excess cash flow, as defined in the senior credit facilities (ECF), multiplied by a factor of 25%, 50% or 75% depending on the leverage ratio at the end of the fiscal year, less any optional prepayments made during the fiscal year. There was no ECF payment due for fiscal year 2005, and therefore, no ECF cash payment was made in the first six months of fiscal year 2006.
42
Recently Released Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation 48, Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties (FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as more-likely-than-not to be sustained by the taxing authority. The recently issued literature also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. FIN 48 also includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Any differences between the amounts recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts reported after adoption will be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the beginning balance of retained earnings. We will be required to adopt FIN 48 in fiscal year 2008, and we are currently in the process of determining the impact, if any, of adopting the provisions of FIN 48 on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under other accounting pronouncements that permit or require fair value measurements, changes the methods used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In particular, disclosures are required to provide information on: the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities; the inputs used to develop measurements; and the effect of certain of the measurements on earnings (or changes in net assets). SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption, as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year is also permitted, provided interim financial statements have not yet been issued. We will be required to adopt SFAS No. 157 in fiscal year 2008, and we are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheet. Under SFAS No. 158, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs or credits that have not yet been recognized through earnings as net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 is effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 and shall not be applied retrospectively. We will be required to adopt SFAS No. 158 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, and we are currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB No. 108). SAB No. 108 provides guidance on how prior year misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify misstatements using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. SAB No. 108 does not change the guidance in SAB No. 99, Materiality, when evaluating the materiality of misstatements. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. Upon initial application, SAB No. 108 permits a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. We will be required to adopt SAB No. 108 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, and we believe at this time that the adoption of SAB No. 108 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
43
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to provide opportunities to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that this statement will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of significant accounting policies. The preparation of these financial statements and application of these policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. However, we are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would result in materially different results from current estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies are the most significant to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most subjective and complex judgments. These matters, and the judgments and uncertainties affecting them, are also essential to understanding our reported and future operating results.
Revenue recognition
We generally recognize revenue upon shipment of product, following receipt of written purchase orders, when the price is fixed or determinable, title has transferred and collectibility is reasonably assured. Approximately 1% of our sales for our fiscal years 2004 through 2006 are based on the percentage of completion method of accounting where the sales value is determined on the basis of costs incurred and estimates of costs at completion, which require management estimates of future costs. Changes in estimated costs at completion over time could have a material impact on our operating results.
Inventory reserves
We assess the valuation of inventory and periodically write down the value for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based upon actual usage and estimates about future demand. The excess balance determined by this analysis becomes the basis for our excess inventory charge. Management personnel play a key role in our excess inventory review process by providing updated sales forecasts, managing product rollovers and working with manufacturing to maximize recovery of excess inventory. If our estimates regarding demand are inaccurate or changes in technology affect demand for certain products in an unforeseen manner, we may incur losses or gains in excess of our established markdown reserve that could be material.
Management also reviews the carrying value of inventory for lower of cost or market on an individual product or contract basis. A loss reserve is charged to cost of sales if the estimated product cost or the contract cost at completion is in excess of net realizable value (selling price less estimated cost of disposal). If the actual contract cost at completion is different than originally estimated, then a loss or gain provision adjustment would be recorded that could have a material impact on our operating results.
44
Product warranty
Our products are generally warranted for a variety of periods, typically one to three years or a predetermined product usage life. A provision for estimated future costs of repair, replacement or customer accommodations is reflected in the consolidated financial statements included in this report. We assess the adequacy of our preexisting warranty liabilities and adjust the balance based on actual experience and changes in future expectations. The determination of product warranty reserves requires us to make estimates of product return rates and expected cost to repair or replace the products under warranty. If actual repair and replacement costs differ significantly from our estimates, then adjustments to recognize additional cost of sales may be required.
Recoverability of long-lived assets
We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives be tested for impairment at least annually. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We amortize identifiable intangible assets on a straight-line basis over their useful lives of up to 50 years.
We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level (our five divisions) based on a two-step approach. First, the carrying amount of the reporting unit is compared to the fair value as estimated by the future net discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the reporting unit. To the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step is performed, wherein the reporting units assets and liabilities are valued. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated as the fair value of the reporting unit in excess of the fair value of all non-goodwill assets and liabilities allocated to the reporting unit. To the extent the reporting units carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, impairment exists and must be recognized. This process requires the use of discounted cash flow models that utilize estimates of future revenue and expenses as well as the selection of appropriate discount rates. There is inherent uncertainty in these estimates, and changes in these factors over time could result in an impairment charge.
At March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets, net was $222 million and $223 million, respectively. As of March 30, 2007, no significant changes in the underlying business assumptions or circumstances that drive the impairment analysis led us to believe that goodwill might have been impaired. We will continue to evaluate the need for impairment if changes in circumstances or available information indicate that impairment may have occurred, and at least annually in the fourth quarter.
At March 30, 2007 and September 29, 2006, the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment was $66 million and $64 million, respectively. We assess the recoverability of property, plant and equipment to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets. If such assets are considered impaired, then the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. This process requires the use of cash flow models that utilize estimates of future revenue and expenses. There is inherent uncertainty in these estimates, and changes in these factors over time could result in an impairment charge.
45
A prolonged general economic downturn and, specifically, a prolonged downturn in the defense, communications or medical markets, or technological changes, as well as other market factors could intensify competitive pricing pressure, create an imbalance of industry supply and demand, or otherwise diminish volumes or profits. Such events, combined with changes in interest rates, could adversely affect our estimates of future net cash flows to be generated by our long-lived assets. Consequently, it is possible that our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected by additional impairment charges related to the recoverability of our long-lived assets.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
At the beginning of fiscal year 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment, for our existing stock option plans under the prospective method. Under the prospective method, only new awards (or awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the effective date) are accounted for under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Previously, we applied the intrinsic-value method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Under the intrinsic-value method, compensation expense was recorded only if the market price of the stock exceeded the stock option exercise price at the measurement date. We will continue to account for stock option awards outstanding at September 30, 2005 using the intrinsic-value method of measuring equity share options unless such options are modified.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable and requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility and estimated option life.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, prior to becoming a public entity in April 2006, we used the minimum value method to determine a calculated value, rather than a fair value, of share awards. Under the minimum value method, stock price volatility was assumed to be zero. The estimated fair value (or calculated value, as applicable) of our stock-based awards, less expected forfeitures, is amortized over the awards vesting period on a straight-line basis for awards granted after the adoption of SFAS No. 123R and on a graded vesting basis for awards granted prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. Since our common stock has not been publicly traded for a sufficient time period, the expected volatility is based on expected volatilities of similar companies that have a longer history of being publicly traded. The expected life of options granted is based on the simplified method for plain vanilla options in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. The risk-free rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant. For the six months ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006, we recognized $0.5 million and zero in stock-based compensation expense, respectively.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We do not use market risk sensitive instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest rate risk: Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term debt and our investment in overnight government securities.
We have variable rate debt that comprises $80.0 million in floating rate senior notes due in 2015 and a $37.5 million term loan under our senior credit facilities, due in 2010. Our variable rate debt is subject to changes in the prime rate and the LIBOR rate. We entered into an interest rate swap contract (the Swap) with a notional amount of $80.0 million to effectively convert the floating rate senior notes to a fixed rate of 9.9% through the Swap maturity date in January 2008. We also have $125.0 million of fixed rate 8% Notes. At March 30, 2007, the fair value of the unrealized gain on the Swap was $0.4 million, net of tax.
46
Foreign currency exchange risk: Although the majority of our revenue and expense activities are transacted in U.S. dollars, we do transact business in foreign countries. Our primary foreign currency cash flows are in Canada and several European countries. In an effort to reduce our foreign currency exposure to Canadian dollar denominated expenses, we enter into Canadian dollar forward contracts to hedge the Canadian dollar denominated costs for our manufacturing operation in Canada. As of March 30, 2007, we had entered into Canadian dollar forward contracts for approximately $24.6 million (Canadian dollars), or 67% of estimated Canadian dollar denominated expenses through December 2007, at an average rate of approximately $0.87 U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar. We estimate the impact of a one cent change in the U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar exchange rate (without giving effect to our Canadian dollar forward contracts) to be approximately $0.5 million annually to operating income or approximately 1.9 cents to basic earnings per share and 1.7 cents to diluted earnings per share.
Net income in the first six months of fiscal year 2007 includes a recognized loss from foreign currency forward contracts of $0.1 million. Net income in the first six months of fiscal year 2006 includes a recognized gain from foreign currency forward contracts of $1.0 million. At March 30, 2007, the fair value of the unrealized loss on Canadian dollar forward contracts was $0.1 million, net of tax.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated for use in this report. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
47
None.
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2006 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At an Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on February 8, 2007, the following proposals were presented for a vote of the stockholders of the Company:
Proposal No. 1: The election of two directors to serve for a three-year term ending at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Nominee |
|
For Votes |
|
Withheld Votes |
|
Jeffrey P. Hughes |
|
14,665,684 |
|
1,041,726 |
|
Stephen R. Larson |
|
15,684,466 |
|
22,944 |
|
The term of office for the following directors continued after the Annual Meeting: O. Joe Caldarelli, Michael F. Finley, Michael Targoff and William P. Rutledge.
Proposal No. 2: The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2007.
Votes |
|
Shares |
|
% of Shares Voted |
|
% of Outstanding Shares |
|
For |
|
15,413,918 |
|
98.13 |
% |
95.84 |
% |
Against |
|
293,217 |
|
1.87 |
% |
1.82 |
% |
Abstain |
|
275 |
|
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
None.
48
No. |
|
Description |
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CPI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Dated: May 14, 2007 |
|
/s/ O. Joe Caldarelli |
|
|
O. Joe Caldarelli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 14, 2007 |
|
/s/ Joel A. Littman |
|
|
Joel A. Littman |
50