vvc_10q.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

OR

[_]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

Commission file number:   1-15467

VECTREN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Vectren Logo
INDIANA
 
35-2086905
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
 
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

One Vectren Square, Evansville, IN 47708
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

812-491-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large accelerated filer                                                                                                                                          Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                                         Smaller reporting company




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes    x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock- Without Par Value
76,357,338
April 30, 2008
Class
Number of Shares
Date



Access to Information

Vectren Corporation makes available all SEC filings and recent annual reports free of charge, including those of its wholly owned subsidiaries, through its website at www.vectren.com, or by request, directed to Investor Relations at the mailing address, phone number, or email address that follows:


Mailing Address:
One Vectren Square
Evansville, Indiana  47708
 
Phone Number:
(812) 491-4000
 
Investor Relations Contact:
Steven M. Schein
Vice President, Investor Relations
sschein@vectren.com



Definitions


AFUDC:  allowance for funds used during construction
 
MMBTU:  millions of British thermal units
APB:  Accounting Principles Board
 
MW:  megawatts
EITF:  Emerging Issues Task Force
 
MWh / GWh:  megawatt hours / thousands of megawatt hours (gigawatt hours)
FASB:  Financial Accounting Standards Board
 
NOx:  nitrogen oxide
 
FERC:  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 
OCC:  Ohio Office of the Consumer Counselor
IDEM:  Indiana Department of Environmental Management
 
OUCC:  Indiana Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor
IURC:  Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission
 
PUCO:  Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
MCF / BCF:  thousands / billions of cubic feet
 
SFAS:  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
MDth / MMDth: thousands / millions of dekatherms
 
USEPA:  United States Environmental Protection Agency
MISO: Midwest Independent System Operator
Throughput:  combined gas sales and gas transportation volumes


-2-



Table of Contents


Item
Number
 
Page
Number
 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
1
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 
Vectren Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
 
 
 
 
 
2
3
4
     
 
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
1
1A
2
6
 


-3-


PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VECTREN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited – In millions)
 
             
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
             
ASSETS
           
             
Current Assets
           
Cash & cash equivalents
  $ 25.2     $ 20.6  
Accounts receivable - less reserves of $5.0 &
               
$3.7, respectively
    250.4       189.4  
Accrued unbilled revenues
    128.7       168.2  
Inventories
    64.1       160.9  
Prepayments & other current assets
    52.7       160.5  
Total current assets
    521.1       699.6  
                 
Utility Plant
               
     Original cost
    4,108.6       4,062.9  
     Less:  accumulated depreciation & amortization
    1,546.2       1,523.2  
Net utility plant
    2,562.4       2,539.7  
                 
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
    209.9       208.8  
Other investments
    82.7       77.0  
Nonutility property - net
    329.1       320.3  
Goodwill - net
    238.0       238.0  
Regulatory assets
    169.3       175.3  
Other assets
    37.5       37.7  
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 4,150.0     $ 4,296.4  











The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

-4-


VECTREN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited – In millions)


             
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
             
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
           
             
Current Liabilities
           
Accounts payable
  $ 114.9     $ 187.4  
Accounts payable to affiliated companies
    81.8       83.7  
Refundable fuel & natural gas costs
    23.8       27.2  
Accrued liabilities
    247.1       171.8  
Short-term borrowings
    305.1       557.0  
Current maturities of long-term debt
    0.3       0.3  
Total current liabilities
    773.0       1,027.4  
                 
                 
Long-term Debt - Net of Current Maturities &
               
Debt Subject to Tender
    1,329.1       1,245.4  
                 
Deferred Income Taxes & Other Liabilities
               
Deferred income taxes
    308.9       318.1  
Regulatory liabilities
    309.4       307.2  
Deferred credits & other liabilities
    164.1       164.2  
Total deferred credits & other liabilities
    782.4       789.5  
                 
Minority Interest in Subsidiary
    0.4       0.4  
                 
Commitments & Contingencies (Notes 7, 11, 12)
               
                 
Common Shareholders' Equity
               
Common stock (no par value) – issued & outstanding
               
76.4 and 76.3, respectively
    532.7       532.7  
Retained earnings
    726.2       688.5  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    6.2       12.5  
Total common shareholders' equity
    1,265.1       1,233.7  
 
               
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
  $ 4,150.0     $ 4,296.4  







The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

-5-


VECTREN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited – In millions, except per share data)


             
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
OPERATING REVENUES
           
Gas utility
  $ 633.6     $ 584.1  
Electric utility
    127.2       108.1  
Nonutility revenues
    141.3       141.8  
Total operating revenues
    902.1       834.0  
OPERATING EXPENSES
               
Cost of gas sold
    462.0       424.5  
Cost of fuel & purchased power
    46.0       40.6  
Cost of nonutility revenues
    95.3       96.4  
Other operating
    115.8       106.5  
Depreciation & amortization
    47.4       45.7  
Taxes other than income taxes
    26.8       24.7  
Total operating expenses
    793.3       738.4  
OPERATING INCOME
    108.8       95.6  
OTHER INCOME
               
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
    14.0       22.2  
Other income – net
    3.0       7.4  
Total other income
    17.0       29.6  
                 
INTEREST EXPENSE
    25.3       25.0  
                 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    100.5       100.2  
                 
INCOME TAXES
    36.5       30.1  
                 
NET INCOME
  $ 64.0     $ 70.1  
                 
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
    76.0       75.8  
DILUTED COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
    76.5       76.5  
                 
EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK:
               
BASIC
  $ 0.84     $ 0.92  
DILUTED
  $ 0.84     $ 0.92  
                 
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE OF
               
COMMON STOCK
  $ 0.33     $ 0.32  



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

-6-


VECTREN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited – In millions)
 
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
       
Net income
  $ 64.0     $ 70.1  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash from operating activities:
 
Depreciation & amortization
    47.4       45.7  
Deferred income taxes & investment tax credits
    12.7       1.5  
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
    (14.0 )     (22.2 )
Provision for uncollectible accounts
    5.3       5.4  
Expense portion of pension & postretirement periodic benefit cost
    1.9       2.4  
Other non-cash charges - net
    2.0       0.2  
Changes in working capital accounts:
               
Accounts receivable & accrued unbilled revenues
    (26.8 )     (11.8 )
Inventories
    96.8       84.5  
Recoverable/refundable fuel & natural gas costs
    (3.4 )     5.5  
Prepayments & other current assets
    91.7       69.5  
Accounts payable, including to affiliated companies
    (74.4 )     (95.3 )
Accrued liabilities
    84.3       58.0  
Unconsolidated affiliate dividends
    2.9       6.8  
Changes in noncurrent assets
    5.9       4.3  
Changes in noncurrent liabilities
    (7.9 )     (9.4 )
Net cash flows from operating activities
    288.4       215.2  
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
         
Proceeds from:
               
Long-term debt, net of issuance costs
    171.5       -  
Stock option exercises & other
    -       5.9  
Requirements for:
               
Dividends on common stock
    (24.7 )     (23.9 )
Retirement of long-term debt
    (103.2 )     -  
Net change in short-term borrowings
    (251.9 )     (192.3 )
Net cash flows from financing activities
    (208.3 )     (210.3 )
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
         
Proceeds from:
               
Unconsolidated affiliate distributions
    -       10.7  
Other collections
    1.9       35.8  
Requirements for:
               
Capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC equity
    (69.6 )     (67.2 )
Unconsolidated affiliate investments
    (0.1 )     (0.1 )
Other investments
    (7.7 )     -  
Net cash flows from investing activities
    (75.5 )     (20.8 )
Net change in cash & cash equivalents
    4.6       (15.9 )
Cash & cash equivalents at beginning of period
    20.6       32.8  
Cash & cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 25.2     $ 16.9  
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

-7-


VECTREN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1.    
Organization and Nature of Operations

Vectren Corporation (the Company or Vectren), an Indiana corporation, is an energy holding company headquartered in Evansville, Indiana.  The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. (Utility Holdings), serves as the intermediate holding company for three operating public utilities:  Indiana Gas Company, Inc. (Indiana Gas or Vectren North), Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO or Vectren South), and the Ohio operations (VEDO or Vectren Ohio).  Utility Holdings also has other assets that provide information technology and other services to the three utilities.  Utility Holdings’ consolidated operations are collectively referred to as the Utility Group.  Both Vectren and Utility Holdings are holding companies as defined by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy Act).  Vectren was incorporated under the laws of Indiana on June 10, 1999.

Indiana Gas provides energy delivery services to over 569,000 natural gas customers located in central and southern Indiana.  SIGECO provides energy delivery services to over 141,000 electric customers and approximately 112,000 gas customers located near Evansville in southwestern Indiana.  SIGECO also owns and operates electric generation to serve its electric customers and optimizes those assets in the wholesale power market.  Indiana Gas and SIGECO generally do business as Vectren Energy Delivery of Indiana.  The Ohio operations provide energy delivery services to approximately 319,000 natural gas customers located near Dayton in west central Ohio.  The Ohio operations are owned as a tenancy in common by Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. (VEDO), a wholly owned subsidiary of Utility Holdings (53 percent ownership), and Indiana Gas (47 percent ownership).  The Ohio operations generally do business as Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio.

The Company, through Vectren Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises), is involved in nonutility activities in three primary business areas:  Energy Marketing and Services, Coal Mining and Energy Infrastructure Services.  Energy Marketing and Services markets and supplies natural gas and provides energy management services.  Coal Mining mines and sells coal.  Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground construction and repair services and performance contracting and renewable energy services.  Enterprises also has other businesses that invest in energy-related opportunities and services, real estate, and leveraged leases, among other investments.  These operations are collectively referred to as the Nonutility Group.  Enterprises supports the Company’s regulated utilities pursuant to service contracts by providing natural gas supply services, coal, infrastructure services, and other services.

2.    
Basis of Presentation

The interim consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report have been prepared by the Company, without audit, as provided in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been omitted as provided in such rules and regulations.  The Company believes that the information in this report reflects all adjustments necessary to fairly state the results of the interim periods reported.  These consolidated condensed financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed February 20, 2008, on Form 10-K.  Because of the seasonal nature of the Company’s utility operations, the results shown on a quarterly basis are not necessarily indicative of annual results.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

-8-


3.    
Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of the following:
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Net income
  $ 64.0     $ 70.1  
Comprehensive loss of unconsolidated affiliates
    (10.1 )     (6.5 )
Cash flow hedges
               
Unrealized gains(losses)
    -       0.1  
Reclassifications to net income
    (0.2 )     0.3  
Income tax benefit
    4.0       2.5  
Total comprehensive income
  $ 57.7     $ 66.5  
 
Other comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliates is the Company’s portion of ProLiance Holdings, LLC’s accumulated other comprehensive income related to their use of cash flow hedges, including commodity contracts, and the Company’s portion of Haddington Energy Partners, LP’s accumulated other comprehensive income related to its unrealized gains and losses of “available for sale securities,” as defined by SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.”

4.    
Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings per share assumes the conversion of stock options into common shares and settlement in shares of an equity forward contract (see Note 10), using the treasury stock method, as well as the conversion of restricted shares using the contingently issuable shares method,  to the extent the effect would be dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
             
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
2008
   
2007
 
             
Numerator:
           
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS - Net income
  $ 64.0     $ 70.1  
                 
Denominator:
               
Denominator for basic EPS - Weighted average
               
common shares outstanding
    76.0       75.8  
Equity forward dilution effect
    -       0.1  
Conversion of stock options and lifting of
               
restrictions on issued restricted stock
    0.5       0.6  
Denominator for diluted EPS - Adjusted weighted
               
average shares outstanding and assumed
               
conversions outstanding
    76.5       76.5  
                 
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.84     $ 0.92  
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.84     $ 0.92  
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, all options were dilutive.  However, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, the effect of the equity forward was antidilutive and was excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

-9-



5.    
Excise and Utility Receipts Taxes

Excise taxes and a portion of utility receipts taxes are included in rates charged to customers.  Accordingly, the Company records these taxes received as a component of operating revenues, which totaled $19.3 million and $18.0 million at March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  Expenses associated with excise and utility receipts taxes are recorded as a component of Taxes other than income taxes.

6.    
Retirement Plans & Other Postretirement Benefits

The Company maintains three qualified defined benefit pension plans, a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), and three other postretirement benefit plans.  The qualified pension plans and the SERP are aggregated under the heading “Pension Benefits.”  Other postretirement benefit plans are aggregated under the heading “Other Benefits.”

Net Periodic Benefit Cost
A summary of the components of net periodic benefit cost follows:
                         
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
   
Pension Benefits
   
Other Benefits
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
Service cost
  $ 1.5     $ 1.4     $ 0.1     $ 0.1  
Interest cost
    3.8       3.7       1.0       1.0  
Expected return on plan assets
    (4.1 )     (3.6 )     (0.1 )     (0.1 )
Amortization of prior service cost
    0.4       0.4       (0.2 )     (0.2 )
Amortization of transitional obligation
    -       -       0.3       0.3  
Amortization of actuarial loss
    -       0.4       -       -  
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 1.6     $ 2.3     $ 1.1     $ 1.1  

Employer Contributions to Qualified Pension Plans
Currently, the Company expects to contribute approximately $10.2 million to its pension plan trusts for 2008.  Through March 31, 2008, contributions of $4.9 million have been made to the pension plan trusts.

Measurement Date Provisions of SFAS 158
SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (SFAS 158), requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end balance sheet.  Prior to the adoption of SFAS 158, Vectren had a September 30 measurement date.  The effects of adopting SFAS 158 were calculated using a measurement of plan assets and benefit obligations as of September 30, 2007 and a 15-month projection of periodic cost to December 31, 2008.  The Company recorded three months of that cost totaling $2.7 million, or $1.7 million after tax, to retained earnings on January 1, 2008.  Related adjustments to Accumulated other comprehensive income and Regulatory assets were not material.
 
7.  
Transactions with ProLiance Holdings, LLC

ProLiance Holdings, LLC (ProLiance), a nonutility energy marketing affiliate of Vectren and Citizens Gas and Coke Utility (Citizens Gas), provides services to a broad range of municipalities, utilities, industrial operations, schools, and healthcare institutions located throughout the Midwest and Southeast United States.  ProLiance’s customers include Vectren’s Indiana utilities and nonutility gas supply operations as well as Citizens Gas.  ProLiance’s primary businesses include gas marketing, gas portfolio optimization, and other portfolio and energy management services.  Consistent with its ownership percentage, Vectren is allocated 61 percent of ProLiance’s profits and losses; however, governance and voting rights remain at 50 percent for each member; and therefore, the Company accounts for its investment in ProLiance using the equity method of accounting.

-10-

Transactions with ProLiance
The Company, including its retail gas supply operations, contracted for approximately 84 percent and 80 percent of its natural gas purchases through ProLiance during the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  Purchases from ProLiance for resale and for injections into storage for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 totaled $289.4 million and $272.8 million, respectively.  Amounts owed to ProLiance at March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, for those purchases were $81.8 million and $81.5 million, respectively, and are included in Accounts payable to affiliated companies.  Amounts charged by ProLiance for gas supply services are established by supply agreements with each utility.

Summarized Financial Information
Summarized financial information related to ProLiance is presented below:
             
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Summarized statement of income information:
           
Revenues
  $ 809.6     $ 768.5  
Margin
    31.0       50.1  
Operating income
    23.3       42.9  
ProLiance's earnings
    23.6       44.3  

             
   
As of March 31,
   
As of December 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Summarized balance sheet information:
           
Current assets
  $ 574.7     $ 684.3  
Noncurrent assets
    42.9       45.2  
Current liabilities
    323.0       436.9  
Noncurrent liabilities
    4.0       4.3  
Equity
    290.6       288.3  
 
Vectren’s share of ProLiance’s operating results, which are included in Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, were $14.4 million and $27.0 million at March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  Vectren’s share of ProLiance’s earnings, after income taxes and allocated interest expense, was $7.8 million and $15.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  ProLiance’s operating results met certain thresholds described in Regulation S-X, paragraph 3.09, as promulgated by the SEC.

Regulatory Matter
ProLiance self-reported to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) in October 2007 possible non-compliance with the Commission’s capacity release policies.  ProLiance has taken corrective actions to assure that current and future transactions are compliant.  ProLiance is committed to full regulatory compliance and is cooperating fully with the FERC regarding these issues.  ProLiance is unable to predict the outcome of any FERC action.

8.    
Synfuel Activity

Pace Carbon Synfuels, LP (Pace Carbon) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to develop, own, and operate four projects to produce and sell coal-based synthetic fuel (synfuel) utilizing Covol technology.  The Company has an 8.3 percent interest in Pace Carbon which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.  The Internal Revenue Code provided for manufacturers, such as Pace Carbon, to receive a tax credit for every ton of synthetic fuel sold.  In addition, Vectren Fuels, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary involved in coal mining, received processing fees from synfuel producers unrelated to Pace Carbon for a portion of its coal production.  Synfuel-related results include equity method losses totaling $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.  In total synfuel-related results inclusive of the equity method losses, the related tax benefits, tax credits, and other activity were earnings of $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.  The tax law authorizing synfuel related credits and fees expired on December 31, 2007.  Synfuel operations ceased coincidental with the expiration of the tax law and Pace Carbon has no future operating plans.

-11-

9.    
Debt Offering in 2008 and Transactions Involving Auction Rate Securities

Utility Holdings Debt Issuance
In March 2008, Utility Holdings issued at par $125 million in 6.25 percent senior unsecured notes due April 1, 2039 (2039 Notes).  The 2039 Notes are guaranteed by Utility Holdings’ three utilities:  SIGECO, Indiana Gas, and VEDO.  These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several.

The 2039 Notes have no sinking fund requirements, and interest payments are due monthly.  The notes may be called by Utility Holdings, in whole or in part, at any time on or after April 1, 2013, at 100 percent of principal amount plus accrued interest.  During 2007, Utility Holdings entered into several interest rate hedges with an $80 million notional amount.  Upon issuance of the notes, these instruments were settled resulting in the payment of approximately $9.6 million, which was recorded as a Regulatory asset pursuant to existing regulatory orders.  The value paid is being amortized as an increase to interest expense over the life of the issue.  The proceeds from the sale of the 2039 Notes, settlement of the hedging arrangements, and payments of issuance costs totaled approximately $111.1 million.

Auction Rate Mode Securities
In February 2008, SIGECO provided notice to the current holders of approximately $103 million of tax-exempt auction rate mode long-term debt of its plans to convert that debt from its current auction rate mode into a daily interest rate mode.  In March 2008, the debt was tendered at 100 percent of the principal amount plus accrued interest.  During March 2008, SIGECO remarketed approximately $61.8 million of these investments at interest rates that are fixed to maturity, receiving proceeds, net of issuance costs, of approximately $60.3 million.  The terms are $22.6 million at 5.15 percent due in 2023, $22.2 million at 5.35 percent due in 2030 and $17.0 million at 5.45 percent due in 2041.  The remaining $41.2 million continues to be held in treasury and is expected to be remarketed at some future date.

10.  
Common Stock Offering in 2007

In February 2007, the Company sold 4.6 million authorized but previously unissued shares of its common stock to a group of underwriters in an SEC-registered primary offering at a price of $28.33 per share.  The transaction generated proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, of approximately $125.7 million.  The Company executed an equity forward sale agreement (equity forward) in connection with the offering, and therefore, did not receive proceeds at the time of the equity offering.

The Company will receive an amount equal to the net proceeds from that sale, subject to certain adjustments defined in the equity forward, upon full share settlement of the equity forward.  Those adjustments defined in the equity forward include 1) daily increases in the forward sale price based on a floating interest factor equal to the federal funds rate, less a 35 basis point fixed spread, and 2) structured quarterly decreases to the forward sale price that align with expected Company dividend payments.

Except in specified circumstances or events that would require share settlement, the Company may elect to settle the equity forward in shares or in cash.  If the Company elects to settle in shares, the maximum number of shares deliverable by the Company is 4.6 million shares.  Proceeds received or paid when the equity forward is settled will be recorded in Common Shareholders' Equity, even if settled in cash.  The equity forward must be settled prior to February 28, 2009.

If the equity forward had been settled by delivery of shares at March 31, 2008, the Company would have received approximately $126 million for the 4.6 million shares.  If the Company had elected to settle the equity forward in cash at March 31, 2008, the Company estimates it would have received approximately $0.6 million, assuming that the trailing three month average of Vectren’s stock price approximates the equity forward’s unwind price.  The federal funds rate was 3.0 percent at March 31, 2008.  The Company currently anticipates settling the equity forward by delivering shares.

-12-



11.  
Commitments & Contingencies

Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of management, there are no legal proceedings pending against the Company that are likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Guarantees & Product Warranties
Vectren issues guarantees to third parties on behalf of its unconsolidated affiliates.  Such guarantees allow those affiliates to execute transactions on more favorable terms than the affiliate could obtain without such a guarantee.  Guarantees may include posted letters of credit, leasing guarantees, and performance guarantees.  As of March 31, 2008, guarantees issued and outstanding on behalf of unconsolidated affiliates approximated $3 million.  The Company has accrued no liabilities for these guarantees as they relate to guarantees executed prior to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.”

In 2006, the Company issued a guarantee with an approximate $5 million maximum risk related to the residual value of an operating lease that expires in 2011.  As of March 31, 2008, Vectren Corporation has a liability representing the fair value of that guarantee of approximately $0.1 million.  Liabilities accrued for, and activity related to, product warranties are not significant.

12.  
Environmental Matters

Clean Air/Climate Change
In March of 2005 USEPA finalized two new air emission reduction regulations.  The Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) is an allowance cap and trade program requiring further reductions in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions from coal-burning power plants.  The Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) is an allowance cap and trade program requiring further reductions in mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants.  Both sets of regulations require emission reductions in two phases.  The first phase deadline for both rules is 2010 (2009 for NOx under CAIR), and the second phase deadline for compliance with the emission reductions required under CAIR is 2015, while the second phase deadline for compliance with the emission reduction requirements of CAMR is 2018.  However, on February 8, 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the federal CAMR regulations.  At this time it is uncertain how this decision will affect Indiana’s recently finalized CAMR implementation program.

To comply with Indiana’s implementation plan of the Clean Air Act of 1990 and to further comply with CAIR and CAMR of 2005, SIGECO has received authority from the IURC to invest in clean coal technology.  Using this authorization, SIGECO has invested approximately $307 million in pollution control equipment, including Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems and fabric filters.  SCR technology is the most effective method of reducing NOx emissions where high removal efficiencies are required and fabric filters control particulate matter emissions.  These investments were included in rate base for purposes of determining new base rates that went into effect on August 15, 2007.  Prior to being included in base rates, return on investments made and recovery of related operating expenses were recovered through a rider mechanism.

Further, the IURC granted SIGECO authority to invest in an SO2 scrubber at its generating facility that is jointly owned with ALCOA (the Company’s portion is 150 MW).  The order, as updated with an increased spending level, allows SIGECO to recover an approximate 8 percent return on up to $92 million, excluding AFUDC, in capital investments through a rider mechanism which is updated every six months for actual costs incurred.  The Company may file periodic updates with the IURC requesting modification to the spending authority.  As of March 31, 2008, the Company has invested approximately $62 million in this project.  The Company expects the SO2 scrubber will be operational in 2009.  At that time, operating expenses including depreciation expense associated with the scrubber will also be recovered through a rider mechanism.

Once the SO2 scrubber is operational, SIGECO’s coal fired generating fleet will be 100 percent scrubbed for SO2 and 90 percent controlled for NOx, and mercury emissions will be reduced to meet the CAMR
 
-13-

mercury reduction standards described in the original 2005 emission reduction regulations.  The use of SCR technology positions the Company to be in compliance with the CAIR deadlines specifying reductions in NOx emissions by 2009 and further reductions by 2015.  SIGECO's investments in scrubber, SCR and fabric filter technology should position it to comply with reasonable mercury reduction requirements should CAMR regulations be further modified.

If legislation requiring reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases or legislation mandating energy from renewable sources is adopted, such regulation could substantially affect both the costs and operating characteristics of the Company’s fossil fuel generating plants and nonutility coal mining operations.  At this time and in the absence of final legislation, compliance costs and other effects associated with reductions in greenhouse gas emissions or obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain. 

SIGECO is studying renewable energy alternatives, and on April 9, 2007, filed a green power rider in order to allow customers to purchase green power and to obtain approval of a contract to purchase 30 MW of power generated by wind energy.  The wind contract has been approved by the IURC.  Future filings with the IURC with regard to new generation and/or further environmental compliance plans will include evaluation of potential carbon requirements.

Environmental Remediation Efforts
In the past, Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and others operated facilities for the manufacture of gas.  Given the availability of natural gas transported by pipelines, these facilities have not been operated for many years.  Under currently applicable environmental laws and regulations, those that operated these facilities may now be required to take remedial action if certain contaminants are found above the regulatory thresholds at these sites.

Indiana Gas identified the existence, location, and certain general characteristics of 26 gas manufacturing and storage sites for which it may have some remedial responsibility.  Indiana Gas completed a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at one of the sites under an agreed order between Indiana Gas and the IDEM, and a Record of Decision was issued by the IDEM in January 2000.  Indiana Gas submitted the remainder of the sites to the IDEM's Voluntary Remediation Program  (VRP) and is currently conducting some level of remedial activities, including groundwater monitoring at certain sites, where deemed appropriate, and will continue remedial activities at the sites as appropriate and necessary.

Indiana Gas accrued the estimated costs for further investigation, remediation, groundwater monitoring, and related costs for the sites.  While the total costs that may be incurred in connection with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this time, Indiana Gas has recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $21 million.

The estimated accrued costs are limited to Indiana Gas’ share of the remediation efforts.  Indiana Gas has arrangements in place for 19 of the 26 sites with other potentially responsible parties (PRP), which serve to limit Indiana Gas’ share of response costs at these 19 sites to between 20 percent and 50 percent.  With respect to insurance coverage, Indiana Gas has received and recorded settlements from all known insurance carriers under insurance policies in effect when these plants were in operation in an aggregate amount approximating $20 million.

In October 2002, SIGECO received a formal information request letter from the IDEM regarding five manufactured gas plants that it owned and/or operated and were not enrolled in the IDEM’s VRP.  In October 2003, SIGECO filed applications to enter four of the manufactured gas plant sites in IDEM's VRP.  The remaining site is currently being addressed in the VRP by another Indiana utility.  SIGECO added those four sites into the renewal of the global Voluntary Remediation Agreement that Indiana Gas has in place with IDEM for its manufactured gas plant sites.  That renewal was approved by the IDEM in February 2004.  SIGECO is also named in a lawsuit filed in federal district court in May 2007, involving another site subject to potential environmental remediation efforts.

SIGECO has filed a declaratory judgment action against its insurance carriers seeking a judgment finding its carriers liable under the policies for coverage of further investigation and any necessary remediation costs that SIGECO may accrue under the VRP program and/or related to the site subject to the May 2007 lawsuit.  While the total costs that may be incurred in connection with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this time, SIGECO has recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $8 million.  With respect to insurance coverage, SIGECO has received and recorded settlements from insurance carriers under insurance policies in effect when these sites were in operation in an aggregate amount approximating the costs it expects to incur.

-14-

Environmental remediation costs related to Indiana Gas’ and SIGECO’s manufactured gas plants and other sites have had no material impact on results of operations or financial condition since costs recorded to date approximate PRP and insurance settlement recoveries.  While the Company’s utilities have recorded all costs which they presently expect to incur in connection with activities at these sites, it is possible that future events may require some level of additional remedial activities which are not presently foreseen and those costs may not be subject to PRP or insurance recovery.

13.  
Rate & Regulatory Matters

Vectren North (Indiana Gas Company, Inc.) Gas Base Rate Order Received
On February 13, 2008, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved the settlement agreement reached in its Vectren North gas rate case.  The order provided for a base rate increase of $16.3 million and an ROE of 10.2 percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.8 percent on rate base of approximately $793 million.  The order also provides for the recovery of $10.6 million of costs through separate cost recovery mechanisms rather than base rates.

Further, additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases.  The accounting treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates.  To qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $20 million and the treatment cannot extend beyond four years on each project.

With this order, the Company has in place for its North gas territory weather normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity management expense. 

Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. (VEDO) Gas Base Rate Case Filing
In November 2007, the Company filed with the PUCO a request for an increase in its base rates and charges for VEDO’s distribution business in its 17-county service area in west central Ohio.  The filing indicates that an increase in base rates of approximately $27 million is necessary to cover the ongoing cost of operating, maintaining and expanding the approximately 5,200-mile distribution system used to serve 318,000 customers.

In addition, the Company is seeking to increase the level of the monthly service charge as well as extending the lost margin recovery mechanism currently in place to be able to encourage customer conservation and is also seeking approval of expanded conservation-oriented programs, such as rebate offerings on high-efficiency natural gas appliances for existing and new home construction, to help customers lower their natural gas bills.  The Company is also seeking approval of a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement program.

The Company anticipates an order from the PUCO in late 2008.

Vectren South (SIGECO) Electric Base Rate Order Received
On August 15, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren South electric rate case.  The settlement agreement provides for an approximate $60.8 million electric rate increase to cover the Company’s cost of system growth, maintenance, safety and reliability.  The settlement provides for, among other things: recovery of ongoing costs and deferred costs associated with the MISO; operations and maintenance (O&M) expense increases related to managing the aging workforce, including the development of expanded apprenticeship programs and the creation of defined training programs to ensure proper knowledge transfer, safety and system stability; increased O&M expense necessary to maintain and improve system reliability; benefit to customers from the sale of wholesale power by Vectren’s sharing equally with customers any profit earned above or below $10.5 million of wholesale power margin; recovery of and return on the investment in past demand side management programs to help encourage conservation during peak load periods; timely recovery of the Company’s investment in certain new electric transmission projects that benefit the MISO infrastructure; an overall rate of return of 7.32 percent on rate base of approximately $1,044 million and an allowed return on equity (ROE) of 10.4 percent.

-15-

Vectren South (SIGECO) Gas Base Rate Order Received
On August 1, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren South gas rate case.  The order provided for a base rate increase of $5.1 million and an ROE of 10.15 percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.20 percent on rate base of approximately $122 million.  The settlement also provides for the recovery of $2.6 million of costs through separate cost recovery mechanisms rather than base rates.

Further, additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases.  The accounting treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates.  To qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $3 million and the treatment cannot extend beyond three years on each project.

With this order, the Company now has in place for its South gas territory weather normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity expense. 

Ohio Lost Margin Recovery/Conservation Filings
In 2005, the Company filed conservation programs and conservation adjustment trackers in Ohio designed to help customers conserve energy and reduce their annual gas bills.  The proposed programs allow the recovery of costs promoting the conservation of natural gas through conservation trackers that work in tandem with a lost margin recovery mechanism.  These mechanisms are designed to allow the recovery of the distribution portion of rates from residential and commercial customers based on the level of customer revenues established in VEDO’s last general rate case.

In June 2007, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approved a settlement that provides for the implementation of a lost margin recovery mechanism and a related conservation program for VEDO.  This order confirms the guidance the PUCO previously provided in a September 2006 decision.  The conservation program, as outlined in the September 2006 PUCO order and as affirmed in this order, provides for a two year, $2 million total conservation program to be paid by the Company, as well as a sales reconciliation rider intended to be a recovery mechanism for the difference between the weather normalized revenues actually collected by the Company and the revenues approved by the PUCO in the Company’s most recent rate case.  Approximately 60 percent of the Company’s Ohio customers are eligible for the conservation programs.  The Ohio Consumer Counselor (OCC) and another intervener requested a rehearing of the June 2007 order and the PUCO granted that request in order to have additional time to consider the merits of the request.  In accordance with accounting authorization previously provided by the PUCO, the Company began recognizing the impact of the September 2006 order on October 1, 2006, and has recognized cumulative revenues of $5.6 million.  The OCC appealed the PUCO’s accounting authorization to the Ohio Supreme Court, but that appeal has been dismissed as premature pending the PUCO’s consideration of issues raised in the OCC’s request for rehearing.  Since October 1, 2006, the Company has been ratably accruing its $2 million commitment.

MISO
Since February 2002 and with the IURC’s approval, the Company has been a member of the Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), a FERC approved regional transmission organization.  The MISO serves the electrical transmission needs of much of the Midwest and maintains operational control over the Company’s electric transmission facilities as well as that of other Midwest utilities.  

Since April 1, 2005, the Company has been an active participant in the MISO energy markets, biddings its owned generation into the Day Ahead and Real Time markets and procuring power for its retail customers at Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) as determined by the MISO market.  The Company is typically in a net sales position with MISO and is only occasionally in a net purchase position.  Net positions are determined on an hourly basis.  When the Company is a net seller such net revenues are included in Electric Utility revenues and when the Company is a net purchaser such net purchases are included in Cost of fuel and purchased power.  The Company also receives transmission revenue that results from other members’ use of the Company’s transmission system.  These revenues are also included in Electric Utility revenues.  Generally, costs charged by the MISO are recovered via base rates or tracking mechanisms.

-16-

As a result of MISO’s operational control over much of the Midwestern electric transmission grid, including SIGECO’s transmission facilities, SIGECO’s continued ability to import power, when necessary, and export power to the wholesale market has been, and may continue to be, impacted.  Given the nature of MISO’s policies regarding use of transmission facilities, as well as ongoing FERC initiatives, and a pending Day 3 market, where MISO plans to provide bid-based regulation and contingency operating reserve markets, it is difficult to predict near term operational impacts.  In March 2008, MISO announced that the Day 3 ancillary services market would begin in September 2008.  The Company has asked the IURC to approve its participation in Day 3 and to approve recovery of costs associated therewith.

The need to expend capital for improvements to the transmission system, both to SIGECO’s facilities as well as to those facilities of adjacent utilities, over the next several years is expected to be significant.  The Company will timely recover its investment in certain new electric transmission projects that benefit the MISO infrastructure at a FERC approved rate of return.

14.  
Fair Value Measurements

SFAS 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements; however, the standard will impact how other fair value based GAAP is applied.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.  The Company  adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities as described in FSP FAS 157-2.  The partial adoption of SFAS 157 did not materially impact Vectren’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the application of SFAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Vectren measures certain financial instruments, primarily derivatives, at fair value on a recurring basis.  SFAS 157 defines a hierarchy for disclosing fair value measurements based primarily on the level of public data used in determining fair value.  Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs include inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 inputs include unobservable inputs using estimates and assumptions developed in-house, which reflect what a market participant would use to determine fair value.  The fair value of financial assets and liabilities was determined using the following inputs at March 31, 2008:
                   
                 
Fair value at
 
As of March 31, 2008
 
December 31,
In millions
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
2007
                   
Derivative assets/(liabilities):
                 
    Regulated gas supply contracts
 $          0.3
 
 $      0.3
 
 $       -
 
 $       -
 
 $              -
    Interest rate related contracts
              -
 
          -
 
          -
 
          -
 
              (8.9)
    Synfuel related contracts
              -
 
          -
 
          -
 
          -
 
              22.8
    Other
             0.9
 
          -
 
          -
 
         0.9
 
               2.6
                   
Included in:
                 
    Prepayments and other current assets
 $          1.2
 
 $      0.3
 
 $       -
 
 $      0.9
 
 $           25.4
    Accrued liabilities
              -
 
          -
 
          -
 
          -
 
               8.9
 
-17-

Derivatives classified as “other” and which are valued using level 3 valuation inputs, are held by a cost-based and rate regulated utility.  Gains and losses associated with marking the instruments to market are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability until recovered from ratepayers.

SFAS 159
Also on January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159).  SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The Company did not choose to apply the option provided in SFAS 159 to any of its eligible items; therefore, its adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of operations.

15.  
Impacts of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

SFAS 141 (Revised 2007)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141R).  SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of an entity (1) recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree (2) recognizes and measures acquired goodwill or a bargain purchase gain and (3) determines what information to disclose in its financial statements in order to enable users to assess the nature and financial effects of the business combination.  SFAS 141R applies to all transactions or other events in which one entity acquires control of one or more businesses and applies to all business entities.  SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009, and because the provisions of this standard are applied prospectively, the impact to the Company cannot be determined until the transactions occur.

SFAS 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS 160).  SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require that the ownership percentages in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented separately from the parent’s equity in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet; the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated income statement; that changes in the parent’s ownership interest while it retains control over its subsidiary be accounted for consistently; that when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment be initially measured at fair value; and that sufficient disclosure is made to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the noncontrolling owners.  SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except for non-profit entities.  SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008.  Early adoption is not permitted.  The Company will adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, and is currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its financial statements and results of operations.

SFAS 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161).  SFAS 161 enhances the current disclosures under SFAS 133 and requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation in order to better convey the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to manage.  Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  Tabular disclosure of fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items is required.  SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged.  The Company will adopt SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009 and is currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its financial statements and results of operations.

-18-



16.  
Segment Reporting

The Company segregates its operations into three groups: 1) Utility Group, 2) Nonutility Group, and 3) Corporate and Other.

The Utility Group is comprised of Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc.’s operations, which consist of the Company’s regulated operations and other operations that provide information technology and other support services to those regulated operations.  The Company segregates its regulated operations into a Gas Utility Services operating segment and an Electric Utility Services operating segment.  The Gas Utility Services segment provides natural gas distribution and transportation services to nearly two-thirds of Indiana and to west central Ohio.  The Electric Utility Services segment provides electric distribution services primarily to southwestern Indiana, and includes the Company’s power generating and wholesale marketing operations.  The Company manages its regulated operations as separated between Energy Delivery, which includes the gas and electric transmission and distribution functions, and Power Supply, which includes the power generating and asset optimization operations.  In total, regulated operations supply natural gas and /or electricity to over one million customers.  In total, the Utility Group has three operating segments as defined by SFAS 131 “Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (SFAS 131).

The Nonutility Group is comprised of one operating segment as defined by SFAS 131 that includes various subsidiaries and affiliates investing in energy marketing and services, coal mining, and energy infrastructure services, among other energy-related opportunities.  
 
Corporate and Other includes unallocated corporate expenses such as advertising and charitable contributions, among other activities, that benefit the Company’s other operating segments.  Net income is the measure of profitability used by management for all operations.  Information related to the Company’s business segments is summarized below:

   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Revenues
           
Utility Group
           
Gas Utility Services
  $ 633.6     $ 584.1  
Electric Utility Services
    127.2       108.1  
Other Operations
    11.7       9.7  
Eliminations
    (11.1 )     (9.3 )
Total Utility Group
    761.4       692.6  
Nonutility Group
    169.7       169.3  
Corporate & Other Group
    -       -  
Eliminations       (29.0      (27.9
Consolidated Revenues
  $ 902.1     $ 834.0  
                 
                 
Profitability Measure - Net Income
               
Gas Utility Services
  $ 42.3     $ 37.9  
Electric Utility Services
    12.6       10.7  
Other Operations
    3.1       2.3  
Utility Group Net Income
    58.0       50.9  
Nonutility Group Net Income
    6.3       19.0  
Corporate & Other Group Net Income
    (0.3 )     0.2  
Consolidated Net Income
  $ 64.0     $ 70.1  

-19-

   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Assets
           
Utility Group
           
Gas Utility Services
  $ 1,987.5     $ 2,049.1  
Electric Utility Services
    1,376.3       1,369.2  
Other Operations
    236.0       245.7  
Eliminations
    (65.4 )     (20.3 )
Total Utility Group
  $ 3,534.4       3,643.7  
Nonutility Group
    633.1       704.1  
Corporate & Other
    439.1       407.0  
Eliminations
    (456.6 )     (458.3 )
Consolidated Assets
  $ 4,150.0     $ 4,296.4  


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Description of the Business

Vectren Corporation (the Company or Vectren), an Indiana corporation, is an energy holding company headquartered in Evansville, Indiana.  The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. (Utility Holdings), serves as the intermediate holding company for three operating public utilities:  Indiana Gas Company, Inc. (Indiana Gas or Vectren North), Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO or Vectren South), and the Ohio operations (VEDO or Vectren Ohio).  Utility Holdings also has other assets that provide information technology and other services to the three utilities.  Utility Holdings’ consolidated operations are collectively referred to as the Utility Group.  Both Vectren and Utility Holdings are holding companies as defined by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy Act).  Vectren was incorporated under the laws of Indiana on June 10, 1999.

Indiana Gas provides energy delivery services to over 569,000 natural gas customers located in central and southern Indiana.  SIGECO provides energy delivery services to over 141,000 electric customers and approximately 112,000 gas customers located near Evansville in southwestern Indiana.  SIGECO also owns and operates electric generation to serve its electric customers and optimizes those assets in the wholesale power market.  Indiana Gas and SIGECO generally do business as Vectren Energy Delivery of Indiana.  The Ohio operations provide energy delivery services to approximately 319,000 natural gas customers located near Dayton in west central Ohio.  The Ohio operations are owned as a tenancy in common by Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. (VEDO), a wholly owned subsidiary of Utility Holdings (53 percent ownership), and Indiana Gas (47 percent ownership).  The Ohio operations generally do business as Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio.

The Company, through Vectren Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises), is involved in nonutility activities in three primary business areas:  Energy Marketing and Services, Coal Mining and Energy Infrastructure Services.  Energy Marketing and Services markets and supplies natural gas and provides energy management services.  Coal Mining mines and sells coal.  Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground construction and repair services and performance contracting and renewable energy services.  Enterprises also has other businesses that invest in energy-related opportunities and services, real estate, and leveraged leases, among other investments.  These operations are collectively referred to as the Nonutility Group.  Enterprises supports the Company’s regulated utilities pursuant to service contracts by providing natural gas supply services, coal, infrastructure services, and other services.

In this discussion and analysis, the Company analyzes contributions to consolidated earnings from its Utility Group and Nonutility Group separately since each operate independently requiring distinct competencies and business strategies, offers different energy and energy related products and services, and experiences different opportunities and risks.  Nonutility Group operations are discussed below as primary operations, other operations, and synfuel-related results.  Primary nonutility operations denote areas of management’s forward looking focus.  Tax laws authorizing tax credits for the production of certain synthetic fuels expired on December 31, 2007, and should not have a material impact on future results.

Per share earnings contributions of the Utility Group, Nonutility Group, and Corporate and Other are presented.  Such per share amounts are based on the earnings contribution of each group included in Vectren’s consolidated results divided by Vectren’s basic average shares outstanding during the period.  The earnings per share of the groups do not represent a direct legal interest in the assets and liabilities allocated to the groups, but rather represent a direct equity interest in Vectren Corporation's assets and liabilities as a whole.

The Utility Group generates revenue primarily from the delivery of natural gas and electric service to its customers.  The primary source of cash flow for the Utility Group results from the collection of customer bills and the payment for goods and services procured for the delivery of gas and electric services.  The activities of and revenues and cash flows generated by the Nonutility Group are closely linked to the utility industry, and the results of those operations are generally impacted by factors similar to those impacting the overall utility industry.  In addition, there are other operations, referred to herein as Corporate and Other, that include unallocated corporate expenses such as advertising and charitable contributions, among other activities.

-21-

The Company has in place a disclosure committee that consists of senior management as well as financial management.  The committee is actively involved in the preparation and review of the Company’s SEC filings.

Executive Summary of Consolidated Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as well as the Company’s 2007 annual report filed on Form 10-K.

     
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Net income
    $ 64.0     $ 70.1  
Attributed to:
Utility Group
    58.0       50.9  
 
Nonutility Group
    6.3       19.0  
 
Corporate & other
    (0.3 )     0.2  
                   
                   
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.84     $ 0.92  
Attributed to:
Utility Group
    0.76       0.67  
                            Nonutility Group
    0.08       0.25  
                    Corporate & other
    -       -  

Results

For the three months ended March 31, 2008, net income was $64.0 million, or $0.84 per share, compared to $70.1 million, or $0.92 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007.  While utility results increased  significantly year over year primarily as a result of the implementation of base rate increases, results reflect decreased earnings from nonutility operations, primarily Energy Marketing and Services and Coal Mining and are reflective of the end of Synfuel-related activities.

Utility Group

In 2008, the Utility Group’s earnings were $58.0 million compared to $50.9 million in 2007, an increase of $7.1 million or $0.09 per share.  The increase resulted primarily from the impact of regulatory initiatives, including base rate increases in the Indiana service territories, and increased earnings from the sale of wholesale power.  The increase was offset somewhat by higher operating costs related to increasing maintenance and reliability costs contemplated in the base rate cases.

In the Company’s electric and Ohio natural gas service territories which are not protected by weather normalization mechanisms, management estimates the impact of weather on margin experienced during the first quarter of 2008 to be $0.8 million favorable compared to 30-year normal temperatures.  In 2007, management estimated the margin impact of warmer-than-normal weather to be $0.6 million unfavorable.  Year over year, the $1.4 million favorable margin impact increased earnings approximately $0.01 per share.

Nonutility Group

The Nonutility Group’s year to date 2008 earnings were $6.3 million compared to $19.0 million in 2007.  In 2007, the last year of synfuel operations, synfuel-related results generated earnings of $3.4 million, or $0.04 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007.   All other Nonutility Group results decreased $9.3 million, or $0.13 per share, as compared to last year’s results.  The decrease was primarily attributable to lower ProLiance Holdings, LLC (ProLiance) and Coal Mining earnings.
-22-

Dividends

Dividends declared for the three months ended March 31, 2008, were $0.325 per share compared to $0.315 per share for the same period in 2007.

Detailed Discussion of Results of Operations

Following is a more detailed discussion of the results of operations of the Company’s Utility and Nonutility operations.  The detailed results of operations for these operations are presented and analyzed before the reclassification and elimination of certain intersegment transactions necessary to consolidate those results into the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.


-23-


Results of Operations of the Utility Group

The Utility Group is comprised of Utility Holdings’ operations.  The operations of the Utility Group consist of the Company’s regulated operations and other operations that provide information technology and other support services to those regulated operations.  The Company segregates its regulated operations into a Gas Utility Services operating segment and an Electric Utility Services operating segment.  The Gas Utility Services segment includes the operations of Indiana Gas, the Ohio operations, and SIGECO’s natural gas distribution business and provides natural gas distribution and transportation services to nearly two-thirds of Indiana and to west central Ohio.  The Electric Utility Services segment includes the operations of SIGECO’s electric transmission and distribution services, which provides electric distribution services primarily to southwestern Indiana, and the Company’s power generating and asset optimization operations.  In total, these regulated operations supply natural gas and/or electricity to over one million customers.  Utility operating results before certain intersegment eliminations and reclassifications for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 follow:

   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
2008
   
2007
 
OPERATING REVENUES
           
Gas utility
  $ 633.6     $ 584.1  
Electric utility
    127.2       108.1  
Other
    0.6       0.4  
Total operating revenues
    761.4       692.6  
OPERATING EXPENSES
               
Cost of gas sold
    462.0       424.5  
Cost of fuel & purchased power
    46.0       40.6  
Other operating
    74.0       67.2  
Depreciation & amortization
    40.7       39.2  
Taxes other than income taxes
    26.2       24.2  
Total operating expenses
    648.9       595.7  
                 
OPERATING INCOME
    112.5       96.9  
                 
OTHER INCOME - NET
    2.0       2.7  
                 
INTEREST EXPENSE
    20.8       19.4  
                 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    93.7       80.2  
                 
INCOME TAXES
    35.7       29.3  
                 
NET INCOME
  $ 58.0     $ 50.9  
 
               
CONTRIBUTION TO VECTREN BASIC EPS
  $ 0.76     $ 0.67  

Significant Fluctuations

Utility Group Margin

Throughout this discussion, the terms Gas Utility margin and Electric Utility margin are used.  Gas Utility margin is calculated as Gas Utility revenues less the Cost of gas sold.  Electric Utility margin is calculated as Electric Utility revenues less Cost of fuel & purchased power.  These measures exclude Other operating expenses, Depreciation and amortization, and Taxes other than income taxes, which are included in the calculation of operating income.  The Company believes Gas Utility and Electric Utility margins are better indicators of relative contribution than revenues since gas prices and fuel costs can be volatile and are generally collected on a dollar-for-dollar basis from customers.

Sales of natural gas and electricity to residential and commercial customers are seasonal and are impacted by weather.  Trends in average use among natural gas residential and commercial customers have tended to decline in recent years as more efficient appliances and furnaces are installed and the price of natural gas has increased.  Normal temperature adjustment (NTA) and lost margin recovery mechanisms largely mitigate the effect on Gas Utility margin that would otherwise be caused by variations in volumes sold due to weather and changing consumption patterns.  Indiana Gas’ territory has both an NTA since 2005 and lost margin recovery since December 2006.  SIGECO’s natural gas territory has an NTA since 2005, and lost margin recovery began when new base rates went into effect August 1, 2007.  The Ohio service territory has lost margin recovery since October 2006, but does not have an NTA mechanism.  SIGECO’s electric service territory does not have an NTA mechanism but has recovery of past demand side management costs. 

-24-

Gas and electric margin generated from sales to large customers (generally industrial and other contract customers) is primarily impacted by overall economic conditions.  Margin is also impacted by the collection of state mandated taxes, which fluctuate with gas and fuel costs, as well as other tracked expenses.  Expenses subject to tracking mechanisms include Ohio bad debts and percent of income payment plan expenses, Indiana gas pipeline integrity management costs, and costs to fund Indiana energy efficiency programs.  Certain operating costs associated with operating environmental compliance equipment were also tracked prior to their recovery in base rates that went into effect on August 15, 2007.  The latest Indiana service territory rate cases, implemented in 2007 and 2008 also provide for the tracking of MISO revenues and costs, as well as the gas cost component of bad debt expense and unaccounted for gas.  Unaccounted for gas is also tracked in the Ohio service territory.  Electric generating asset optimization activities are primarily affected by market conditions, the level of excess generating capacity, and electric transmission availability.  Following is a discussion and analysis of margin generated from regulated utility operations.

Gas Utility Margin (Gas Utility revenues less Cost of gas sold)
Gas Utility margin and throughput by customer type follows:
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
             
Gas utility revenues
  $ 633.6     $ 584.1  
Cost of gas sold
    462.0       424.5  
Total gas utility margin
  $ 171.6     $ 159.6  
Margin attributed to:
               
Residential & commercial customers
  $ 150.9     $ 140.3  
Industrial customers
    16.7       15.7  
Other
    4.0       3.6  
Sold & transported volumes in MMDth attributed to:
         
Residential & commercial customers
    57.8       54.8  
Industrial customers
    28.7       26.4  
Total sold & transported volumes
    86.5       81.2  

For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, gas utility margins were $171.6 million, an increase of $12.0 million over the prior year.  Margin increases associated with the Vectren North base rate increase, effective February 14, 2008, were $2.7 million.  Margin increases associated with the Vectren South base rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, were $2.6 million.  Year to date 2008, Ohio weather was 3 percent colder than the prior year and resulted in an estimated increase in margin of approximately $1.2 million compared to 2007.  Operating costs, including revenue and usage taxes recovered dollar-for-dollar in margin, increased gas margin $3.4 million year over year.  The remaining increase is related primarily to lost margin recovery mechanisms.  The average cost per dekatherm of gas purchased for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was $9.44 compared to $8.85 in 2007.


-25-


Electric Utility Margin (Electric Utility revenues less Cost of fuel & purchased power)
Electric Utility margin by revenue type follows:
   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
             
Electric utility revenues
  $ 127.2     $ 108.1  
Cost of fuel & purchased power
    46.0       40.6  
Total electric utility margin
  $ 81.2     $ 67.5  
Margin attributed to:
               
Residential & commercial customers
  $ 49.9     $ 39.8  
Industrial customers
    18.7       16.5  
Municipal & other customers
    4.5       5.1  
Subtotal: retail & firm wholesale
  $ 73.1     $ 61.4  
Wholesale Power Marketing
  $ 8.1     $ 6.1  
                 
Electric volumes sold in GWh attributed to:
               
Residential & commercial customers
    715.2       697.9  
Industrial customers
    600.7       627.0  
Municipal & other
    36.6       135.1  
Total retail & firm wholesale volumes sold
    1,352.5       1,460.0  

Retail Margin
Electric retail and firm wholesale utility margins were $73.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase over the prior year of $11.7 million.  The base rate increase that went into effect on August 15, 2007, produced incremental margin of $13.1 million.  Management estimates the year over year increases in usage by residential and commercial customers due to weather to be $0.2 million.  Offsetting these increases is the expiration of certain firm wholesale municipal contracts which generated margin of $2.2 million in 2007.  The remaining increase is primarily attributable to pricing, including $0.7 million in recovery of pollution control investments and other items.

Margin from Wholesale Power Marketing Activity
Periodically, generation capacity is in excess of that needed to serve native load.  The Company markets and sells this unutilized generating and transmission capacity to optimize the return on its owned assets.  On an annual basis, a majority of the margin generated from these activities is associated with wholesale off-system sales into the MISO Day Ahead market.
 
Following is a reconciliation of Wholesale Power Marketing activity:

   
Three months ended March 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2008
   
2007
 
Off-system sales
  $ 7.2     $ 5.3  
Transmission system sales
    0.9       0.8  
Total Wholesale Power Marketing
  $ 8.1     $ 6.1  

Wholesale power marketing margins were $8.1 million for the first quarter of 2008, an increase of $2.0 million over the prior year.  Certain firm wholesale municipal contracts have been allowed to expire and the associated volumes are being used to meet retail peak reserve requirements.  The increase in wholesale power marketing margins is due to the increase in off peak volumes available for sale off system and an increase in wholesale prices.  Off-system sales totaled 461.3 GWh in 2008, compared to 260.5 GWh in 2007.
 
Utility Group Operating Expenses

Other Operating Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, other operating expenses were $74.0 million, an increase of $6.8 million, compared to 2007.  Costs resulting from increased maintenance and other activities contemplated in rate cases, including amortization of prior deferred costs, totaled $5.0 million in 2008.  Pass-through costs that are recovered in utility margin increased $2.1 million year over year.  

-26-

Depreciation & Amortization
Depreciation expense was $40.7 million for the quarter, an increase of $1.5 million compared to 2007.  The increase relates to the addition of plant and the amortization
in 2008 associated with prior electric demand side management costs pursuant to the August 15, 2007 electric base rate order.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes other than income taxes were $26.2 million for the quarter, an increase of $2.0 million compared to the prior year quarter.  The increase is primarily attributable to $1.5 million in additional utility receipts, excise, and usage taxes as a result of volatility.  In 2008, property taxes increased due to increased plant in service.

Other Income-Net

Other-net reflects income of $2.0 million for the quarter, a decrease of $0.7 million compared to the prior year quarter.  The decrease is primarily attributable to $0.4 million in lower capitalization of funds used during construction.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $20.8 million for the quarter, an increase of $1.4 million compared to the prior year quarter.  The increase reflects higher average short term debt balances and the impact of long term financing transactions completed during the first quarter, including the issuance of $125 million in senior unsecured notes at 6.25 percent due in 2039 and the short-term refinancing of approximately $103 million of auction rate mode debt.  Of that amount, $62 million was remarketed in March 2008 at fixed interest rates and the remaining $41 million will be remarketed at a future date.  The impact of declining short-term interest rates helped offset these increases.

Income Taxes

In 2008, federal and state income taxes were $35.7 million for the quarter, an increase of $6.4 million compared to the prior year quarter.  The higher taxes are primarily due to higher pretax income.

Environmental Matters

Clean Air/Climate Change

In March of 2005 USEPA finalized two new air emission reduction regulations.  The Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) is an allowance cap and trade program requiring further reductions in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions from coal-burning power plants.  The Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) is an allowance cap and trade program requiring further reductions in mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants.  Both sets of regulations require emission reductions in two phases.  The first phase deadline for both rules is 2010 (2009 for NOx under CAIR), and the second phase deadline for compliance with the emission reductions required under CAIR is 2015, while the second phase deadline for compliance with the emission reduction requirements of CAMR is 2018.  However, on February 8, 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the federal CAMR regulations.  At this time it is uncertain how this decision will affect Indiana’s recently finalized CAMR implementation program.

To comply with Indiana’s implementation plan of the Clean Air Act of 1990 and to further comply with CAIR and CAMR of 2005, SIGECO has received authority from the IURC to invest in clean coal technology.  Using this authorization, SIGECO has invested approximately $307 million in pollution control equipment, including Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems and fabric filters.  SCR technology is the most effective method of reducing NOx emissions where high removal efficiencies are required and fabric filters control particulate matter emissions.  These investments were included in rate base for purposes of determining new base rates that went into effect on August 15, 2007.  Prior to being included in base rates, return on investments made and recovery of related operating expenses were recovered through a rider mechanism.

-27-

Further, the IURC granted SIGECO authority to invest in an SO2 scrubber at its generating facility that is jointly owned with ALCOA (the Company’s portion is 150 MW).  The order, as updated with an increased spending level, allows SIGECO to recover an approximate 8 percent return on up to $92 million, excluding AFUDC, in capital investments through a rider mechanism which is updated every six months for actual costs incurred.  The Company may file periodic updates with the IURC requesting modification to the spending authority.  As of March 31, 2008, the Company has invested approximately $62 million in this project.  The Company expects the SO2 scrubber will be operational in 2009.  At that time, operating expenses including depreciation expense associated with the scrubber will also be recovered through a rider mechanism.

Once the SO2 scrubber is operational, SIGECO’s coal fired generating fleet will be 100 percent scrubbed for SO2 and 90 percent controlled for NOx, and mercury emissions will be reduced to meet the CAMR mercury reduction standards described in the original 2005 emission reduction regulations.  The use of SCR technology positions the Company to be in compliance with the CAIR deadlines specifying reductions in NOx emissions by 2009 and further reductions by 2015.  SIGECO's investments in scrubber, SCR and fabric filter technology should position it to comply with reasonable mercury reduction requirements should CAMR regulations be further modified.

If legislation requiring reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases or legislation mandating energy from renewable sources is adopted, such regulation could substantially affect both the costs and operating characteristics of the Company’s fossil fuel generating plants and nonutility coal mining operations.  At this time and in the absence of final legislation, compliance costs and other effects associated with reductions in greenhouse gas emissions or obtaining renewable energy sources remain uncertain. 

SIGECO is studying renewable energy alternatives, and on April 9, 2007, filed a green power rider in order to allow customers to purchase green power and to obtain approval of a contract to purchase 30 MW of power generated by wind energy.  The wind contract has been approved.  Future filings with the IURC with regard to new generation and/or further environmental compliance plans will include evaluation of potential carbon requirements.

Manufactured Gas Plants

In the past, Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and others operated facilities for the manufacture of gas.  Given the availability of natural gas transported by pipelines, these facilities have not been operated for many years.  Under currently applicable environmental laws and regulations, those that operated these facilities may now be required to take remedial action if certain contaminants are found above the regulatory thresholds at these sites.

Indiana Gas identified the existence, location, and certain general characteristics of 26 gas manufacturing and storage sites for which it may have some remedial responsibility.  Indiana Gas completed a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at one of the sites under an agreed order between Indiana Gas and the IDEM, and a Record of Decision was issued by the IDEM in January 2000.  Indiana Gas submitted the remainder of the sites to the IDEM's Voluntary Remediation Program  (VRP) and is currently conducting some level of remedial activities, including groundwater monitoring at certain sites, where deemed appropriate, and will continue remedial activities at the sites as appropriate and necessary.

Indiana Gas accrued the estimated costs for further investigation, remediation, groundwater monitoring, and related costs for the sites.  While the total costs that may be incurred in connection with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this time, Indiana Gas has recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $21 million.

The estimated accrued costs are limited to Indiana Gas’ share of the remediation efforts.  Indiana Gas has arrangements in place for 19 of the 26 sites with other potentially responsible parties (PRP), which serve to limit Indiana Gas’ share of response costs at these 19 sites to between 20 percent and 50 percent.  With respect to insurance coverage, Indiana Gas has received and recorded settlements from all known insurance carriers under insurance policies in effect when these plants were in operation in an aggregate amount approximating $20 million.

In October 2002, SIGECO received a formal information request letter from the IDEM regarding five manufactured gas plants that it owned and/or operated and were not enrolled in the IDEM’s VRP.  In October 2003, SIGECO filed applications to enter four of the manufactured gas plant sites in IDEM's VRP.  The remaining site is currently being addressed in the VRP by another Indiana utility.  SIGECO added those four sites into the renewal of the global Voluntary Remediation Agreement that Indiana Gas has in place with IDEM for its manufactured gas plant sites.  That renewal was approved by the IDEM in February 2004.  SIGECO is also named in a lawsuit filed in federal district court in May 2007, involving another site subject to potential environmental remediation efforts.

-28-

SIGECO has filed a declaratory judgment action against its insurance carriers seeking a judgment finding its carriers liable under the policies for coverage of further investigation and any necessary remediation costs that SIGECO may accrue under the VRP program and/or related to the site subject to the May 2007 lawsuit.  While the total costs that may be incurred in connection with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this time, SIGECO has recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $8 million.  With respect to insurance coverage, SIGECO has received and recorded settlements from insurance carriers under insurance policies in effect when these sites were in operation in an aggregate amount approximating the costs it expects to incur.

Environmental remediation costs related to Indiana Gas’ and SIGECO’s manufactured gas plants and other sites have had no material impact on results of operations or financial condition since costs recorded to date approximate PRP and insurance settlement recoveries.  While the Company’s utilities have recorded all costs which they presently expect to incur in connection with activities at these sites, it is possible that future events may require some level of additional remedial activities which are not presently foreseen and those costs may not be subject to PRP or insurance recovery.

Rate and Regulatory Matters

Vectren North (Indiana Gas Company, Inc.) Gas Base Rate Order Received

On February 13, 2008, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved the settlement agreement reached in its Vectren North gas rate case.  The order provided for a base rate increase of $16.3 million and an ROE of 10.2 percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.8 percent on rate base of approximately $793 million.  The order also provides for the recovery of $10.6 million of costs through separate cost recovery mechanisms rather than base rates.

Further, additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases.  The accounting treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates.  To qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $20 million and the treatment cannot extend beyond four years on each project.

With this order, the Company has in place for its North gas territory weather normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity management expense. 

Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. (VEDO) Gas Base Rate Case Filing

In November 2007, the Company filed with the PUCO a request for an increase in its base rates and charges for VEDO’s distribution business in its 17-county service area in west central Ohio.  The filing indicates that an increase in base rates of approximately $27 million is necessary to cover the ongoing cost of operating, maintaining and expanding the approximately 5,200-mile distribution system used to serve 318,000 customers.

In addition, the Company is seeking to increase the level of the monthly service charge as well as extending the lost margin recovery mechanism currently in place to be able to encourage customer conservation and is also seeking approval of expanded conservation-oriented programs, such as rebate offerings on high-efficiency natural gas appliances for existing and new home construction, to help customers lower their natural gas bills.  The Company is also seeking approval of a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement program.

The Company anticipates an order from the PUCO in late 2008.

-29-



Vectren South (SIGECO) Electric Base Rate Order Received

On August 15, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren South electric rate case.  The settlement agreement provides for an approximate $60.8 million electric rate increase to cover the Company’s cost of system growth, maintenance, safety and reliability.  The settlement provides for, among other things: recovery of ongoing costs and deferred costs associated with the MISO; operations and maintenance (O&M) expense increases related to managing the aging workforce, including the development of expanded apprenticeship programs and the creation of defined training programs to ensure proper knowledge transfer, safety and system stability; increased O&M expense necessary to maintain and improve system reliability; benefit to customers from the sale of wholesale power by Vectren’s sharing equally with customers any profit earned above or below $10.5 million of wholesale power margin; recovery of and return on the investment in past demand side management programs to help encourage conservation during peak load periods; timely recovery of the Company’s investment in certain new electric transmission projects that benefit the MISO infrastructure; an overall rate of return of 7.32 percent on rate base of approximately $1,044 million and an allowed return on equity (ROE) of 10.4 percent.  The increase in Electric Utility margin as a result of this order totaled $17.9 million in 2007.

Vectren South (SIGECO) Gas Base Rate Order Received

On August 1, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren South gas rate case.  The order provided for a base rate increase of $5.1 million and an ROE of 10.15 percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.20 percent on rate base of approximately $122 million.  The settlement also provides for the recovery of $2.6 million of costs through separate cost recovery mechanisms rather than base rates.

Further, additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases.  The accounting treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates.  To qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $3 million and the treatment cannot extend beyond three years on each project.

With this order, the Company now has in place for its South gas territory weather normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity expense. 

Ohio Lost Margin Recovery/Conservation Filings

In 2005, the Company filed conservation programs and conservation adjustment trackers in Ohio designed to help customers conserve energy and reduce their annual gas bills.  The proposed programs allow the recovery of costs promoting the conservation of natural gas through conservation trackers that work in tandem with a lost margin recovery mechanism.  These mechanisms are designed to allow the recovery of the distribution portion of rates from residential and commercial customers based on the level of customer revenues established in VEDO’s last general rate case.

In June 2007, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approved a settlement that provides for the implementation of a lost margin recovery mechanism and a related conservation program for VEDO.  This order confirms the guidance the PUCO previously provided in a September 2006 decision.  The conservation program, as outlined in the September 2006 PUCO order and as affirmed in this order, provides for a two year, $2 million total conservation program to be paid by the Company, as well as a sales reconciliation rider intended to be a recovery mechanism for the difference between the weather normalized revenues actually collected by the Company and the revenues approved by the PUCO in the Company’s most recent rate case.  Approximately 60 percent of the Company’s Ohio customers are eligible for the conservation programs.  The Ohio Consumer Counselor (OCC) and another intervener requested a rehearing of the June 2007 order and the PUCO granted that request in order to have additional time to consider the merits of the request.  In accordance with accounting authorization previously provided by the PUCO, the Company began recognizing the impact of the September 2006 order on October 1, 2006, and has recognized cumulative revenues of $5.6 million.  The OCC appealed the PUCO’s accounting authorization to the Ohio Supreme Court, but that appeal has been dismissed as premature pending the PUCO’s consideration of issues raised in the OCC’s request for rehearing.  Since October 1, 2006, the Company has been ratably accruing its $2 million commitment.

-30-

MISO

Since February 2002 and with the IURC’s approval, the Company has been a member of the Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), a FERC approved regional transmission organization.  The MISO serves the electrical transmission needs of much of the Midwest and maintains operational control over the Company’s electric transmission facilities as well as that of other Midwest utilities.  

Since April 1, 2005, the Company has been an active participant in the MISO energy markets, biddings its owned generation into the Day Ahead and Real Time markets and procuring power for its retail customers at Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) as determined by the MISO market.  The Company is typically in a net sales position with MISO and is only occasionally in a net purchase position.  Net positions are determined on an hourly basis.  When the Company is a net seller such net revenues are included in Electric Utility revenues and when the Company is a net purchaser such net purchases are included in Cost of fuel and purchased power.  The Company also receives transmission revenue that results from other members’ use of the Company’s transmission system.  These revenues are also included in Electric Utility revenues.  Generally, costs charged by the MISO are recovered via base rates or tracking mechanisms.

As a result of MISO’s operational control over much of the Midwestern electric transmission grid, including SIGECO’s transmission facilities, SIGECO’s continued ability to import power, when necessary, and export power to the wholesale market has been, and may continue to be, impacted.  Given the nature of MISO’s policies regarding use of transmission facilities, as well as ongoing FERC initiatives, and a pending Day 3 market, where MISO plans to provide bid-based regulation and contingency operating reserve markets, it is difficult to predict near term operational impacts.  In March 2008, MISO announced that the Day 3 ancillary services market would begin in September 2008.  The Company has asked the IURC to approve its participation in Day 3 and to approve recovery of costs associated therewith.

The need to expend capital for improvements to the transmission system, both to SIGECO’s facilities as well as to those facilities of adjacent utilities, over the next several years is expected to be significant.  The Company will timely recover its investment in certain new electric transmission projects that benefit the MISO infrastructure at a FERC approved rate of return.


-31-


Results of Operations of the Nonutility Group

The Nonutility Group operates in three primary business areas: Energy Marketing and Services, Coal Mining, and Energy Infrastructure Services.  Energy Marketing and Services markets and supplies natural gas and provides energy management services.  Coal Mining mines and sells coal.  Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground construction and repair and provides performance contracting and renewable energy services.  There are also other businesses that invest in energy-related opportunities and services, real estate, and leveraged leases, among other investments.  The Nonutility Group supports the Company’s regulated utilities pursuant to service contracts by providing natural gas supply services, coal, infrastructure services, and other services.  Nonutility Group earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, follow:

   
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
(In millions, except per share amounts)
 
2008
   
2007
 
             
NET INCOME
  $ 6.3     $ 19.0  
                 
CONTRIBUTION TO VECTREN BASIC EPS
  $ 0.08     $ 0.25  
                 
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTED TO:
               
Energy Marketing & Services
  $ 9.0     $ 15.7  
Mining Operations
    (0.9 )     1.6  
Energy Infrastructure
    (3.2 )     (2.0 )
Other Businesses
    1.4       0.3  
Synfuel-related results
    -       3.4  
 
Primary nonutility operations contributed earnings of $4.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as compared to $15.3 million in 2007.  Primary nonutility operations include Energy Marketing and Services companies, Coal Mining operations, and Energy Infrastructure Services companies.

Energy Marketing and Services

Energy Marketing and Services is comprised of the Company’s gas marketing operations, energy management services, and retail gas supply operations.  Net income, inclusive of holding company costs, generated by Energy Marketing and Services for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, was $9.0 million compared to $15.7 million in 2007.

ProLiance

ProLiance, a nonutility energy marketing affiliate of Vectren and Citizens Gas and Coke Utility (Citizens Gas), provides services to a broad range of municipalities, utilities, industrial operations, schools, and healthcare institutions located throughout the Midwest and Southeast United States.  ProLiance’s customers include Vectren’s Indiana utilities and nonutility gas supply operations and Citizens Gas.  ProLiance’s primary businesses include gas marketing, gas portfolio optimization, and other portfolio and energy management services.  Consistent with its ownership percentage, Vectren is allocated 61 percent of ProLiance’s profits and losses; however, governance and voting rights remain at 50 percent for each member; and therefore the Company accounts for its investment in ProLiance using the equity method of accounting.  Vectren received regulatory approval on April 25, 2006, from the IURC for ProLiance to continue to provide natural gas supply services to the Company’s Indiana utilities through March 2011.

ProLiance’s earnings contribution totaled $7.8 million in 2008 compared to $15.2 million in 2007.  In 2008, recent lower volatility in the wholesale natural gas markets has more than offset the effect of increased storage capacity.  ProLiance’s storage capacity was 40 BCF in 2008 compared to 35 BCF in March 2007 and 40 BCF at December 31, 2007.  Firm storage capacity will increase to 47 Bcf by the end of 2008.  The Company expects that ProLiance’s results may be further impacted in 2008 due to the more recent lower price volatility. 
 
Regulatory Matter

ProLiance self-reported to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) in October 2007 possible non-compliance with the Commission’s capacity release policies.  ProLiance has taken corrective actions to assure that current and future transactions are compliant.  ProLiance is committed to full regulatory compliance and is cooperating fully with the FERC regarding these issues.  ProLiance is unable to predict the outcome of any FERC action.

-32-

Vectren Source

Vectren Retail, LLC (d/b/a Vectren Source), a wholly owned subsidiary, provides natural gas and other related products and services to customers opting for choice among energy providers.  Vectren Source earned $2.0 million in 2008 compared to $0.7 million in 2007.  The increase in earnings is primarily due to colder weather and more favorable pricing.  Vectren Source’s customer count at March 31, 2008 was approximately 157,000 as compared to 147,000 at March 31, 2007.

Coal Mining Operations

Coal Mining Operations mine and sell coal to the Company’s utility operations and to third parties through its wholly owned subsidiary Vectren Fuels, Inc. (Fuels).

Coal Mining operations, inclusive of holding company costs, incurred a loss of approximately $0.9 million in 2008 compared to earnings of $1.6 million in 2007.  The decline in earnings is primarily due  to lost production and increased costs somewhat offset by increased prices  Revised Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) guidelines regarding roof structure necessitated redeploying one continuous miner and nearly doubled the expense in securing the roof structure.  As a result, yield at the Prosperity mine was down 8 percent and costs per ton increased over 20 percent.  Further, the increased cost of diesel fuel has negatively impacted Coal Mining operations results. However, while increased costs may continue, the Company expects that earnings from mining operations will improve over first quarter results due primarily to expected improvement in production levels.

In April 2006, Fuels announced plans to open two new underground mines near Vincennes, Indiana.  Construction continues at the new underground mines, and the box-cut was started in February.  Production is expected to begin in early 2009, with the second mine opening the following year.  Reserves at the two mines are estimated at 80 million tons of recoverable number-five coal at 11,200 BTU (British thermal units) and 6-pound sulfur dioxide.  Management estimates a $125 million investment to access the reserves.  Once in production, the two new mines are expected to produce 5 million tons of coal per year.  Through March 31, 2008, the Company has made investments totaling $25.7 million in the new mines.

Energy Infrastructure Services

Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground construction and repair to utility infrastructure through Miller Pipeline Corporation (Miller) and energy performance contracting and renewable energy services through Energy Systems Group, LLC (ESG).  Inclusive of holding company costs, Energy Infrastructure’s operations incurred a seasonal loss of $3.2 million in 2008 compared to a loss of $2.0 million in 2007.

Miller’s year to date seasonal loss was $1.7 million in both 2008 and 2007.  ESG’s loss in 2008 was $1.1 million compared to a loss of $0.3 million in 2007.  The higher loss was primarily due to lower beginning backlog and the timing of projects that have been awarded but not yet released.  At March 31, 2008, ESG’s backlog was $43 million compared to $52 million at December 31, 2007.



-33-


Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

SFAS 157

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157), except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities.  FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually).  This FSP deferred the effective date of Statement 157 for those items to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.

SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  This statement does not require any new fair value measurements; however, the standard impacts how other fair value based GAAP is applied.  The partial adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  Disclosures impacted by SFAS 157 are included in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.  The adoption of the remaining components of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2009 is also not expected to be material on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

SFAS 159

Also on January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159).  SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The Company did not choose to apply the option provided in SFAS 159 to any of its eligible items; therefore, its adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of operations.

SFAS 141 (Revised 2007)

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" (SFAS 141R).  SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of an entity (1) recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree (2) recognizes and measures acquired goodwill or a bargain purchase gain and (3) determines what information to disclose in its financial statements in order to enable users to assess the nature and financial effects of the business combination.  SFAS 141R applies to all transactions or other events in which one entity acquires control of one or more businesses and applies to all business entities.  SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.  Early adoption is not permitted.  The Company will adopt SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009, and because the provisions of this standard are applied prospectively, the impact to the Company cannot be determined until the transactions occur.

SFAS 160

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB No. 51"(SFAS 160).  SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require that the ownership percentages in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented separately from the parent’s equity in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet; the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated income statement; that changes in the parent’s ownership interest while it retains control over its subsidiary be accounted for consistently; that when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment be initially measured at fair value; and that sufficient disclosure is made to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the noncontrolling owners.  SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except for non-profit entities.  SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008.  Early adoption is not permitted.  The Company will adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, and is currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its financial statements and results of operations.


-34-


SFAS 161

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161).  SFAS 161 enhances the current disclosures under SFAS 133 and requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation in order to better convey the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to manage.  Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  Tabular disclosure of fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items is required.  SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged.  The Company will adopt SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009 and is currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its financial statements and results of operations.

Financial Condition

Within Vectren’s consolidated group, Utility Holdings funds the short-term and long-term financing needs of the Utility Group operations, and Vectren Capital Corp (Vectren Capital) funds short-term and long-term financing needs of the Nonutility Group and corporate operations.  Vectren Corporation guarantees Vectren Capital’s debt, but does not guarantee Utility Holdings’ debt.  Vectren Capital’s long-term and short-term obligations outstanding at March 31, 2008, totaled $183 million and $169 million, respectively.  Utility Holdings’ outstanding long-term and short-term borrowing arrangements are jointly and severally guaranteed by Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and VEDO.  Utility Holdings’ long-term and short-term obligations outstanding at March 31, 2008, totaled $825 million and $136 million, respectively.  Additionally, prior to Utility Holdings’ formation, Indiana Gas and SIGECO funded their operations separately, and therefore, have long-term debt outstanding funded solely by their operations.

The Company’s common stock dividends are primarily funded by utility operations.  Nonutility operations have demonstrated profitability and the ability to generate cash flows.  These cash flows are primarily reinvested in other nonutility ventures, but are also used to fund a portion of the Company’s dividends, and from time to time may be reinvested in utility operations or used for corporate expenses.

The credit ratings of the senior unsecured debt of Utility Holdings and Indiana Gas, at March 31, 2008, are A-/Baa1 as rated by Standard and Poor's Ratings Services (Standard and Poor’s) and Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), respectively.  The credit ratings on SIGECO's secured debt are A/A3.  Utility Holdings’ commercial paper has a credit rating of A-2/P-2.  The current outlook of both Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s is stable.  These ratings and outlooks have not changed since December 31, 2007.  A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities.  The rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.  Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s lowest level investment grade rating is BBB- and Baa3, respectively.

The Company’s consolidated equity capitalization objective is 45-55 percent of long-term capitalization.  This objective may have varied, and will vary, depending on particular business opportunities, capital spending requirements, execution of long-term financing plans and seasonal factors that affect the Company’s operations.  The Company’s equity component was 49 percent and 50 percent of long-term capitalization at March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.  Long-term capitalization includes long-term debt, including current maturities and debt subject to tender, as well as common shareholders’ equity.

The Company expects the majority of its capital expenditures, investments, and debt security redemptions to be provided by internally generated funds.  However, due to increased levels of forecasted capital expenditures and expected growth in nonutility operations, the Company may require additional permanent financing.  The Company expects to settle an equity forward contract within the next twelve months and recently issued new long-term debt as more fully described below.  As of March 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.

-35-

Sources & Uses of Liquidity

Operating Cash Flow

The Company's primary source of liquidity to fund working capital requirements has been cash generated from operations, which totaled $288.4 million in 2008, compared to $215.2 million in 2007, an increase of $73.2 million

The increase was primarily a result of changes in working capital accounts.  Net income before non-cash charges of $119.3 million increased $16.2 million, compared to $103.1 million in 2007.  Working capital changes generated cash of $168.2 million in 2008 compared to cash generated of $110.4 million in 2007.

Financing Cash Flow

Although working capital requirements are generally funded by cash flow from operations, the Company uses short-term borrowings to supplement working capital needs when accounts receivable balances are at their highest and gas storage is refilled.  Additionally, short-term borrowings are required for capital projects and investments until they are financed on a long-term basis.

Cash flow required for financing activities reflects the impact of recently executed long-term financing, increases in common stock dividends over the periods presented, and changes in short term borrowings.  Financing activities are generally flat with net activity approximating $200 million in cash requirements in both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.  In 2008, Utility Holdings issued $125 million of senior unsecured securities and used those proceeds to refinance certain capital projects originally financed with short-term borrowings.  Also, during the first quarter of 2008, the Company mitigated its exposure to auction rate debt markets.  These transactions are more fully described below.

VUHI Debt Issuance
In March 2008, Utility Holdings issued $125 million in 6.25 percent senior unsecured notes due April 1, 2039 (2039 Notes) at par.  The 2039 Notes are guaranteed by Utility Holdings’ three public utilities:  SIGECO, Indiana Gas, and VEDO.  These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several.

The 2039 Notes have no sinking fund requirements, and interest payments are due monthly.  The notes may be called by Utility Holdings, in whole or in part, at any time on or after April 1, 2013, at 100 percent of principal amount plus accrued interest.  During 2007, Utility Holdings entered into several interest rate hedges with an $80 million notional amount.  Upon issuance of the notes, these instruments were settled resulting in the payment of approximately $9.6 million, which was recorded as a Regulatory asset pursuant to existing regulatory orders.  The value paid is being amortized as an increase to interest expense over the life of the issue.  The proceeds from the sale of the 2039 Notes, settlement of the hedging arrangements, and payments of issuance costs totaled approximately $111.1 million.

Auction Rate Mode Securities
In February 2008, SIGECO provided notice to the current holders of approximately $103 million of tax-exempt auction rate mode long-term debt of its plans to convert that debt from its current auction rate mode into a daily interest rate mode.  In March 2008, the debt was tendered at 100 percent of the principal amount plus accrued interest and is shown as a retirement of debt in the consolidated statement of cash flows.  During March 2008, SIGECO remarketed approximately $61.8 million of these investments at interest rates that are fixed to maturity, receiving proceeds, net of issuance costs, of approximately $60.3 million.  The terms are $22.6 million at 5.15 percent due in 2023, $22.2 million at 5.35 percent due in 2030 and $17.0 million at 5.45 percent due in 2041.  The remaining $41.2 million continues to be held in treasury and is expected to be remarketed at some future date.

Investing Cash Flow

Cash flow required for investing activities was $75.5 million in 2008 and $20.8 million in 2007.  Capital expenditures are the primary component of investing activities and totaled $69.6 million in 2008, compared to $67.2 million in 2007.  The quarter ended March 31, 2008 includes higher levels of expenditures for coal mine development.  Investing cash flow in 2007 includes the receipt of $44.9 million in proceeds from the sale of SIGECOM.

-36-

Available Sources of Liquidity

Short-term Borrowing Arrangements

At March 31, 2008, the Company has $780 million of short-term borrowing capacity, including $520 million for the Utility Group and $260 million for the wholly owned Nonutility Group and corporate operations, of which approximately $384 million is available for the Utility Group operations and approximately $91 million is available for the wholly owned Nonutility Group and corporate operations.

Common Stock Offering in 2007

In February 2007, the Company sold 4.6 million authorized but previously unissued shares of its common stock to a group of underwriters in an SEC-registered primary offering at a price of $28.33 per share.  The transaction generated proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, of approximately $125.7 million.  The Company executed an equity forward sale agreement (equity forward) in connection with the offering, and therefore, did not receive proceeds at the time of the equity offering.

The Company will receive an amount equal to the net proceeds from that sale, subject to certain adjustments defined in the equity forward, upon full share settlement of the equity forward.  Those adjustments defined in the equity forward include 1) daily increases in the forward sale price based on a floating interest factor equal to the federal funds rate, less a 35 basis point fixed spread, and 2) structured quarterly decreases to the forward sale price that align with expected Company dividend payments.

Except in specified circumstances or events that would require share settlement, the Company may elect to settle the equity forward in shares or in cash.  If the Company elects to settle in shares, the maximum number of shares deliverable by the Company is 4.6 million shares.  Proceeds received or paid when the equity forward is settled will be recorded in Common Shareholders' Equity, even if settled in cash.  The equity forward must be settled prior to February 28, 2009.

If the equity forward had been settled by delivery of shares at March 31, 2008, the Company would have received approximately $126 million for the 4.6 million shares.  If the Company had elected to settle the equity forward in cash at March 31, 2008, the Company estimates it would have received approximately $0.6 million, assuming the trailing three month average of Vectren’s stock price approximates the equity forward’s unwind price.  The federal funds rate was 3.0 percent at March 31, 2008.  The Company currently anticipates settling the equity forward by delivering shares.

New Share Issues

The Company may periodically issue new common shares to satisfy the dividend reinvestment plan, stock option plan and other employee benefit plan requirements.  New issuances added additional liquidity of $5.8 million in 2007.

Potential Uses of Liquidity

Planned Capital Expenditures & Investments

Investments in total company capital expenditures and nonutility unconsolidated affiliates for the remainder of 2008 are estimated to approximate $350 million.

Other Guarantees and Letters of Credit
 
In the normal course of business, Vectren issues guarantees to third parties on behalf of its unconsolidated affiliates.  Such guarantees allow those affiliates to execute transactions on more favorable terms than the affiliate could obtain without such a guarantee.  Guarantees may include posted letters of credit, leasing guarantees, and performance guarantees.  As of March 31, 2008, guarantees issued and outstanding on behalf of unconsolidated affiliates approximated $3 million.  
-37-

The Company has accrued no liabilities for these guarantees as they relate to guarantees executed prior to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.”
 
In 2006, the Company issued a guarantee with an approximate $5.0 million maximum risk related to the residual value of an operating lease that expires in 2011.  As of March 31, 2008, Vectren Corporation has a liability representing the fair value of that guarantee of approximately $0.1 million.  Liabilities accrued for, and activity related to, product warranties are not significant.  Through December 31, 2007, the Company has not been called upon to satisfy any obligations pursuant to its guarantees.

-38-


Forward-Looking Information
A “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements is provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act of 1995).  The Reform Act of 1995 was adopted to encourage such forward-looking statements without the threat of litigation, provided those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected in the statement.  Certain matters described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition are forward-looking statements.  Such statements are based on management’s beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management.  When used in this filing, the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “endeavor”, “estimate”, “expect”, “objective”, “projection”, “forecast”, “goal” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements, factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

·  
Factors affecting utility operations such as unusual weather conditions; catastrophic weather-related damage; unusual maintenance or repairs; unanticipated changes to fossil fuel costs; unanticipated changes to gas transportation and storage costs, or availability due to higher demand, shortages, transportation problems or other developments; environmental or pipeline incidents; transmission or distribution incidents; unanticipated changes to electric energy supply costs, or availability due to demand, shortages, transmission problems or other developments; or electric transmission or gas pipeline system constraints.
·  
Increased competition in the energy industry, including the effects of industry restructuring and unbundling.
·  
Regulatory factors such as unanticipated changes in rate-setting policies or procedures, recovery of investments and costs made under traditional regulation, and the frequency and timing of rate increases.
·  
Financial, regulatory or accounting principles or policies imposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board; the Securities and Exchange Commission; the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; state public utility commissions; state entities which regulate electric and natural gas transmission and distribution, natural gas gathering and processing, electric power supply; and similar entities with regulatory oversight.
·  
Economic conditions including the effects of an economic downturn, inflation rates, commodity prices, and monetary fluctuations.
·  
Increased natural gas commodity prices and the potential impact on customer consumption, uncollectible accounts expense, unaccounted for gas and interest expense.
·  
Changing market conditions and a variety of other factors associated with physical energy and financial trading activities including, but not limited to, price, basis, credit, liquidity, volatility, capacity, interest rate, and warranty risks.
·  
The performance of projects undertaken by the Company’s nonutility businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities, including but not limited to, the realization of synfuel income tax credits and the Company’s coal mining, gas marketing, and energy infrastructure strategies.
·  
Direct or indirect effects on the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations resulting from changes in credit ratings, changes in interest rates, and/or changes in market perceptions of the utility industry and other energy-related industries.
·  
Employee or contractor workforce factors including changes in key executives, collective bargaining agreements with union employees, aging workforce issues, or work stoppages.
·  
Legal and regulatory delays and other obstacles associated with mergers, acquisitions and investments in joint ventures.
·  
Costs, fines, penalties and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations, claims, including, but not limited to, such matters involving compliance with state and federal laws and interpretations of these laws.
·  
Changes in federal, state or local legislative requirements, such as changes in tax laws or rates, environmental laws, including laws governing greenhouse gases, mandates of sources of renewable energy, and other regulations.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in actual results, changes in assumptions, or other factors affecting such statements.

-39-

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to various business risks associated with commodity prices, interest rates, and counter-party credit.  These financial exposures are monitored and managed by the Company as an integral part of its overall risk management program.  The Company’s risk management program includes, among other things, the use of derivatives.  The Company may also execute derivative contracts in the normal course of operations while buying and selling commodities to be used in operations and optimizing its generation assets.

The Company has in place a risk management committee that consists of senior management as well as financial and operational management.  The committee is actively involved in identifying risks as well as reviewing and authorizing risk mitigation strategies.

These risks are not significantly different from the information set forth in Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in the Vectren 2007 Form 10-K and is therefore not presented herein.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, there have been no changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 31, 2008, the Company conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness and the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2007, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is:
1)  
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and
 
   2)
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of management, there are no legal proceedings pending against the Company that are likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.  See the notes to the consolidated financial statements regarding commitments and contingencies, environmental matters, rate and regulatory matters.  The consolidated condensed financial statements are included in Part 1 Item 1.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

The Company’s risk factors have not materially changed from the information set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors included in the Vectren 2007 Form 10-K and are therefore not presented herein.


-40-


ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Periodically, the Company purchases shares from the open market to satisfy share requirements associated with the Company’s share-based compensation plans.  The following chart contains information regarding open market purchases made by the Company to satisfy share-based compensation requirements during the quarter ended March 31, 2008.

           
Total Number of
 
Maximum Number
   
Number of
     
Shares Purchased as
 
of Shares That May
   
Shares
 
Average Price
 
Part of Publicly
 
Be Purchased Under
Period
 
Purchased
 
Paid Per Share
 
Announced Plans
 
These Plans
  January 1-31
 
               -
 
                  -
 
                            -
 
                          -
    February 1-28
 
          4,320
 
 $           27.10
 
                            -
 
                          -
March 1-31
 
               -
 
                  -
 
                            -
 
                          -

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

Exhibits and Certifications

4.1
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 10, 2008, among Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc., Indiana Gas
Company, Inc., Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company, Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc., and U.S.
Bank Trust National Association (Filed and designated in Form 8-K, dated March 12, 2008, File No.
1-15467, as Exhibit 4.1)
 
31.1     Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002- Chief Executive Officer

31.2     Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002- Chief Financial Officer

32
Certification Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

-41-



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



     
   VECTREN CORPORATION     
 
     
       Registrant
 
       
       
       
       
 
May 2, 2008
 
/s/Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.                                                 
     
Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.
     
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
     
(Principal Financial Officer)
       
       
       
     
/s/M. Susan Hardwick                                                       
     
M. Susan Hardwick
     
Vice President, Controller and Assistant Treasurer
     
(Principal Accounting Officer)