vvc_10q.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
[_]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from __________________ to __________________
Commission
file number: 1-15467
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
INDIANA
|
|
35-2086905
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
One
Vectren Square, Evansville, IN
47708
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. x
Yes □
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer □ Accelerated
filer x
Non-accelerated
filer □ (Do not check if a
smaller reporting
company) Smaller
reporting company □
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
□
Yes x No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock- Without
Par Value
|
76,357,338
|
April 30,
2008
|
Class
|
Number of Shares
|
Date
|
Access
to Information
Vectren
Corporation makes available all SEC filings and recent annual reports free of
charge, including those of its wholly owned subsidiaries, through its website at
www.vectren.com, or by request, directed to Investor Relations at the mailing
address, phone number, or email address that follows:
Mailing
Address:
One
Vectren Square
Evansville,
Indiana 47708
|
|
Phone
Number:
(812)
491-4000
|
|
Investor
Relations Contact:
Steven
M. Schein
Vice
President, Investor Relations
sschein@vectren.com
|
Definitions
AFUDC: allowance
for funds used during construction
|
MMBTU: millions
of British thermal units
|
APB: Accounting
Principles Board
|
MW: megawatts
|
EITF: Emerging
Issues Task Force
|
MWh
/ GWh: megawatt hours / thousands of megawatt hours (gigawatt
hours)
|
FASB: Financial
Accounting Standards Board
|
NOx: nitrogen
oxide
|
FERC: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
|
OCC: Ohio
Office of the Consumer Counselor
|
IDEM: Indiana
Department of Environmental Management
|
OUCC: Indiana
Office of the Utility Consumer Counselor
|
IURC: Indiana
Utility Regulatory Commission
|
PUCO: Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio
|
MCF
/ BCF: thousands / billions of cubic feet
|
SFAS: Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards
|
MDth
/ MMDth: thousands / millions of dekatherms
|
USEPA: United
States Environmental Protection Agency
|
MISO:
Midwest Independent System Operator
|
Throughput: combined
gas sales and gas transportation
volumes
|
Item
Number
|
|
Page
Number
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
1
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Vectren
Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
1
|
|
|
1A
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
VECTREN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited – In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
& cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
Accounts
receivable - less reserves of $5.0 &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.7,
respectively
|
|
|
250.4 |
|
|
|
189.4 |
|
Accrued
unbilled revenues
|
|
|
128.7 |
|
|
|
168.2 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
160.9 |
|
Prepayments
& other current assets
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
160.5 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
521.1 |
|
|
|
699.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
Plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
cost
|
|
|
4,108.6 |
|
|
|
4,062.9 |
|
Less: accumulated
depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
1,546.2 |
|
|
|
1,523.2 |
|
Net
utility plant
|
|
|
2,562.4 |
|
|
|
2,539.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
209.9 |
|
|
|
208.8 |
|
Other
investments
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
Nonutility
property - net
|
|
|
329.1 |
|
|
|
320.3 |
|
Goodwill
- net
|
|
|
238.0 |
|
|
|
238.0 |
|
Regulatory
assets
|
|
|
169.3 |
|
|
|
175.3 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$ |
4,150.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,296.4 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
VECTREN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited – In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
|
$ |
187.4 |
|
Accounts
payable to affiliated companies
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
Refundable
fuel & natural gas costs
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
247.1 |
|
|
|
171.8 |
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
305.1 |
|
|
|
557.0 |
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
773.0 |
|
|
|
1,027.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
Debt - Net of Current Maturities &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Subject to Tender
|
|
|
1,329.1 |
|
|
|
1,245.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Income Taxes & Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
308.9 |
|
|
|
318.1 |
|
Regulatory
liabilities
|
|
|
309.4 |
|
|
|
307.2 |
|
Deferred
credits & other liabilities
|
|
|
164.1 |
|
|
|
164.2 |
|
Total
deferred credits & other liabilities
|
|
|
782.4 |
|
|
|
789.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
Interest in Subsidiary
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
& Contingencies (Notes 7, 11, 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock (no par value) – issued & outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.4
and 76.3, respectively
|
|
|
532.7 |
|
|
|
532.7 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
726.2 |
|
|
|
688.5 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Total
common shareholders' equity
|
|
|
1,265.1 |
|
|
|
1,233.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
$ |
4,150.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,296.4 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
VECTREN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited – In millions, except per
share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
utility
|
|
$ |
633.6 |
|
|
$ |
584.1 |
|
Electric
utility
|
|
|
127.2 |
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
Nonutility
revenues
|
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
Total
operating revenues
|
|
|
902.1 |
|
|
|
834.0 |
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of gas sold
|
|
|
462.0 |
|
|
|
424.5 |
|
Cost
of fuel & purchased power
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
Cost
of nonutility revenues
|
|
|
95.3 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
Other
operating
|
|
|
115.8 |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
Depreciation
& amortization
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
793.3 |
|
|
|
738.4 |
|
OPERATING
INCOME
|
|
|
108.8 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
OTHER
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
Other
income – net
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Total
other income
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
|
DILUTED
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
DILUTED
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDENDS
DECLARED PER SHARE OF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON
STOCK
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
VECTREN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited – In
millions)
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash from operating activities:
|
|
Depreciation
& amortization
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Deferred
income taxes & investment tax credits
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Equity
in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
Provision
for uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Expense
portion of pension & postretirement periodic benefit
cost
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Other
non-cash charges - net
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Changes
in working capital accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable & accrued unbilled revenues
|
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
96.8 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
Recoverable/refundable
fuel & natural gas costs
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
Prepayments
& other current assets
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
69.5 |
|
Accounts
payable, including to affiliated companies
|
|
|
(74.4 |
) |
|
|
(95.3 |
) |
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
Unconsolidated
affiliate dividends
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Changes
in noncurrent assets
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Changes
in noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Net
cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
288.4 |
|
|
|
215.2 |
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
171.5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Stock
option exercises & other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Requirements
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
on common stock
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
Retirement
of long-term debt
|
|
|
(103.2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net
change in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(251.9 |
) |
|
|
(192.3 |
) |
Net
cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
(208.3 |
) |
|
|
(210.3 |
) |
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated
affiliate distributions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Other
collections
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
Requirements
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures, excluding AFUDC equity
|
|
|
(69.6 |
) |
|
|
(67.2 |
) |
Unconsolidated
affiliate investments
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other
investments
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net
cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(75.5 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
Net
change in cash & cash equivalents
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
Cash
& cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
Cash
& cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.
VECTREN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1.
|
Organization
and Nature of Operations
|
Vectren
Corporation (the Company or Vectren), an Indiana corporation, is an energy
holding company headquartered in Evansville, Indiana. The Company’s
wholly owned subsidiary, Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. (Utility Holdings),
serves as the intermediate holding company for three operating public
utilities: Indiana Gas Company, Inc. (Indiana Gas or Vectren North),
Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO or Vectren South), and the
Ohio operations (VEDO or Vectren Ohio). Utility Holdings also has
other assets that provide information technology and other services to the three
utilities. Utility Holdings’ consolidated operations are collectively
referred to as the Utility Group. Both Vectren and Utility Holdings
are holding companies as defined by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy
Act). Vectren was incorporated under the laws of Indiana on June 10,
1999.
Indiana
Gas provides energy delivery services to over 569,000 natural gas customers
located in central and southern Indiana. SIGECO provides energy
delivery services to over 141,000 electric customers and approximately 112,000
gas customers located near Evansville in southwestern Indiana. SIGECO
also owns and operates electric generation to serve its electric customers and
optimizes those assets in the wholesale power market. Indiana Gas and
SIGECO generally do business as Vectren Energy Delivery of
Indiana. The Ohio operations provide energy delivery services to
approximately 319,000 natural gas customers located near Dayton in west central
Ohio. The Ohio operations are owned as a tenancy in common by Vectren
Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. (VEDO), a wholly owned subsidiary of Utility
Holdings (53 percent ownership), and Indiana Gas (47 percent
ownership). The Ohio operations generally do business as Vectren
Energy Delivery of Ohio.
The
Company, through Vectren Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises), is involved in
nonutility activities in three primary business areas: Energy
Marketing and Services, Coal Mining and Energy Infrastructure
Services. Energy Marketing and Services markets and supplies natural
gas and provides energy management services. Coal Mining mines and
sells coal. Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground
construction and repair services and performance contracting and renewable
energy services. Enterprises also has other businesses that invest in
energy-related opportunities and services, real estate, and leveraged leases,
among other investments. These operations are collectively referred
to as the Nonutility Group. Enterprises
supports the Company’s regulated utilities pursuant to service contracts by
providing natural gas supply services, coal, infrastructure services, and other
services.
The
interim consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report have
been prepared by the Company, without audit, as provided in the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States have been omitted as provided in such rules and
regulations. The Company believes that the information in this report
reflects all adjustments necessary to fairly state the results of the interim
periods reported. These consolidated condensed financial statements
and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited
annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007,
filed February 20, 2008, on Form 10-K. Because of the seasonal nature
of the Company’s utility operations, the results shown on a quarterly basis are
not necessarily indicative of annual results.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Comprehensive
income consists of the following:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
Comprehensive
loss of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Cash
flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains(losses)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Reclassifications
to net income
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
57.7 |
|
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
Other
comprehensive income of unconsolidated affiliates is the Company’s portion of
ProLiance Holdings, LLC’s accumulated other comprehensive income related to
their use of cash flow hedges, including commodity contracts, and the Company’s
portion of Haddington Energy Partners, LP’s accumulated other comprehensive
income related to its unrealized gains and losses of “available for sale
securities,” as defined by SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities.”
Basic
earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per share assumes the conversion of stock
options into common shares and settlement in shares of an equity forward
contract (see Note 10), using the treasury stock method, as well as the
conversion of restricted shares using the contingently issuable shares
method, to the extent the effect would be dilutive.
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions, except per share data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted EPS - Net income
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic EPS - Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common
shares outstanding
|
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
|
Equity
forward dilution effect
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Conversion
of stock options and lifting of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions
on issued restricted stock
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Denominator
for diluted EPS - Adjusted weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
shares outstanding and assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
conversions
outstanding
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, all options were
dilutive. However, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
effect of the equity forward was antidilutive and was excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share.
5.
|
Excise
and Utility Receipts Taxes
|
Excise
taxes and a portion of utility receipts taxes are included in rates charged to
customers. Accordingly, the Company records these taxes received as a
component of operating revenues, which totaled $19.3 million and $18.0 million
at March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Expenses associated with
excise and utility receipts taxes are recorded as a component of Taxes other than income
taxes.
6.
|
Retirement
Plans & Other Postretirement
Benefits
|
The
Company maintains three qualified defined benefit pension plans, a nonqualified
supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), and three other postretirement
benefit plans. The qualified pension plans and the SERP are
aggregated under the heading “Pension Benefits.” Other postretirement
benefit plans are aggregated under the heading “Other Benefits.”
Net Periodic Benefit
Cost
A summary
of the components of net periodic benefit cost follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
Pension
Benefits
|
|
|
Other
Benefits
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Amortization
of transitional obligation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Amortization
of actuarial loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Employer Contributions to
Qualified Pension Plans
Currently,
the Company expects to contribute approximately $10.2 million to its pension
plan trusts for 2008. Through March 31, 2008, contributions of $4.9
million have been made to the pension plan trusts.
Measurement Date Provisions
of SFAS 158
SFAS No.
158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (SFAS 158),
requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of
its year-end balance sheet. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 158,
Vectren had a September 30 measurement date. The effects of adopting
SFAS 158 were calculated using a measurement of plan assets and benefit
obligations as of September 30, 2007 and a 15-month projection of periodic cost
to December 31, 2008. The Company recorded three months of that cost
totaling $2.7 million, or $1.7 million after tax, to retained earnings on
January 1, 2008. Related adjustments to Accumulated other comprehensive
income and Regulatory
assets were not material.
7.
|
Transactions
with ProLiance Holdings, LLC
|
ProLiance
Holdings, LLC (ProLiance), a nonutility energy marketing
affiliate of Vectren and Citizens Gas and Coke Utility (Citizens Gas), provides
services to a broad range of municipalities, utilities, industrial operations,
schools, and healthcare institutions located throughout the Midwest and
Southeast United States. ProLiance’s customers include Vectren’s
Indiana utilities and nonutility gas supply operations as well as Citizens
Gas. ProLiance’s primary businesses include gas marketing, gas
portfolio optimization, and other portfolio and energy management
services. Consistent with its ownership percentage, Vectren is
allocated 61 percent of ProLiance’s profits and losses; however, governance and
voting rights remain at 50 percent for each member; and therefore, the Company
accounts for its investment in ProLiance using the equity method of
accounting.
Transactions with
ProLiance
The
Company, including its retail gas supply operations, contracted for
approximately 84 percent and 80 percent of its natural gas purchases through
ProLiance during the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Purchases from ProLiance for resale and for injections
into storage for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 totaled $289.4
million and $272.8 million, respectively. Amounts owed to ProLiance
at March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, for those purchases were $81.8 million
and $81.5 million, respectively, and are included in Accounts payable to affiliated
companies. Amounts charged by ProLiance for gas supply
services are established by supply agreements with each utility.
Summarized Financial
Information
Summarized
financial information related to ProLiance is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Summarized
statement of income information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
809.6 |
|
|
$ |
768.5 |
|
Margin
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
ProLiance's
earnings
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of March 31,
|
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Summarized
balance sheet information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
$ |
574.7 |
|
|
$ |
684.3 |
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
323.0 |
|
|
|
436.9 |
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Equity
|
|
|
290.6 |
|
|
|
288.3 |
|
Vectren’s
share of ProLiance’s operating results, which are included in Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates, were $14.4 million and $27.0 million at March 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Vectren’s share of ProLiance’s earnings, after
income taxes and allocated interest expense, was $7.8 million and $15.2 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. ProLiance’s operating results met certain thresholds
described in Regulation S-X, paragraph 3.09, as promulgated by the
SEC.
Regulatory
Matter
ProLiance
self-reported to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the
Commission) in October 2007 possible non-compliance with the Commission’s
capacity release policies. ProLiance has taken corrective actions to
assure that current and future transactions are compliant. ProLiance is
committed to full regulatory compliance and is cooperating fully with the FERC
regarding these issues. ProLiance is unable to predict the outcome of any
FERC action.
Pace
Carbon Synfuels, LP (Pace Carbon) is a Delaware limited partnership formed to
develop, own, and operate four projects to produce and sell coal-based synthetic
fuel (synfuel) utilizing Covol technology. The Company has an 8.3 percent
interest in Pace Carbon which is accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. The Internal Revenue Code provided for manufacturers, such as
Pace Carbon, to receive a tax credit for every ton of synthetic fuel sold.
In addition, Vectren Fuels, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary involved in coal
mining, received processing fees from synfuel producers unrelated to Pace Carbon
for a portion of its coal production. Synfuel-related results include
equity method losses totaling $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007. In total synfuel-related results inclusive of the equity method
losses, the related tax benefits, tax credits, and other activity were earnings
of $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The tax
law authorizing synfuel related credits and fees expired on December 31,
2007. Synfuel
operations ceased coincidental with the expiration of the tax law and Pace
Carbon has no future operating plans.
9.
|
Debt
Offering in 2008 and Transactions Involving Auction Rate
Securities
|
Utility Holdings Debt
Issuance
In March
2008, Utility Holdings issued at par $125 million in 6.25 percent senior
unsecured notes due April 1, 2039 (2039 Notes). The 2039 Notes are
guaranteed by Utility Holdings’ three utilities: SIGECO, Indiana Gas,
and VEDO. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and
several.
The 2039
Notes have no sinking fund requirements, and interest payments are due
monthly. The notes may be called by Utility Holdings, in whole or in
part, at any time on or after April 1, 2013, at 100 percent of principal amount
plus accrued interest. During 2007, Utility Holdings entered into
several interest rate hedges with an $80 million notional
amount. Upon issuance of the notes, these instruments were settled
resulting in the payment of approximately $9.6 million, which was recorded as a
Regulatory asset
pursuant to existing regulatory orders. The value paid is being
amortized as an increase to interest expense over the life of the
issue. The proceeds from the sale of the 2039 Notes, settlement of
the hedging arrangements, and payments of issuance costs totaled approximately
$111.1 million.
Auction Rate Mode
Securities
In
February 2008, SIGECO provided notice to the current holders of approximately
$103 million of tax-exempt auction rate mode long-term debt of its plans to
convert that debt from its current auction rate mode into a daily interest rate
mode. In March 2008, the debt was tendered at 100 percent of the principal
amount plus accrued interest. During March 2008, SIGECO remarketed
approximately $61.8 million of these investments at interest rates that are
fixed to maturity, receiving proceeds, net of issuance costs, of approximately
$60.3 million. The terms are $22.6 million at 5.15 percent due in
2023, $22.2 million at 5.35 percent due in 2030 and $17.0 million at 5.45
percent due in 2041. The remaining $41.2 million continues to be held
in treasury and is expected to be remarketed at some future
date.
10.
|
Common
Stock Offering in 2007
|
In
February 2007, the Company sold 4.6 million authorized but previously unissued
shares of its common stock to a group of underwriters in an SEC-registered
primary offering at a price of $28.33 per share. The transaction
generated proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, of
approximately $125.7 million. The Company executed an equity forward
sale agreement (equity forward) in connection with the offering, and therefore,
did not receive proceeds at the time of the equity offering.
The
Company will receive an amount equal to the net proceeds from that sale, subject
to certain adjustments defined in the equity forward, upon full share settlement
of the equity forward. Those adjustments defined in the equity
forward include 1) daily increases in the forward sale price based on a floating
interest factor equal to the federal funds rate, less a 35 basis point
fixed spread, and 2) structured quarterly decreases to the forward sale price
that align with expected Company dividend payments.
Except in
specified circumstances or events that would require share settlement, the
Company may elect to settle the equity forward in shares or in
cash. If the Company elects to settle in shares, the maximum number
of shares deliverable by the Company is 4.6 million shares. Proceeds
received or paid when the equity forward is settled will be recorded in Common Shareholders' Equity,
even if settled in cash. The equity forward must be settled prior to
February 28, 2009.
If the
equity forward had been settled by delivery of shares at March 31, 2008, the
Company would have received approximately $126 million for the 4.6 million
shares. If the Company had elected to settle the equity forward in
cash at March 31, 2008, the Company estimates it would have received
approximately $0.6 million, assuming that the trailing three month average of
Vectren’s stock price approximates the equity forward’s unwind
price. The federal funds rate was 3.0 percent at March 31,
2008. The Company currently anticipates settling the equity forward
by delivering shares.
11.
|
Commitments
& Contingencies
|
Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business. In the opinion of management, there are no legal
proceedings pending against the Company that are likely to have a material
adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Guarantees & Product
Warranties
Vectren
issues guarantees to third parties on behalf of its unconsolidated
affiliates. Such guarantees allow those affiliates to execute
transactions on more favorable terms than the affiliate could obtain without
such a guarantee. Guarantees may include posted letters of credit,
leasing guarantees, and performance guarantees. As of March 31, 2008,
guarantees issued and outstanding on behalf of unconsolidated affiliates
approximated $3 million. The Company has accrued no liabilities for
these guarantees as they relate to guarantees executed prior to the adoption of
FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others.”
In 2006,
the Company issued a guarantee with an approximate $5 million maximum risk
related to the residual value of an operating lease that expires in
2011. As of March 31, 2008, Vectren Corporation has a liability
representing the fair value of that guarantee of approximately $0.1
million. Liabilities accrued for, and activity related to, product
warranties are not significant.
12.
|
Environmental
Matters
|
Clean Air/Climate
Change
In March
of 2005 USEPA finalized two new air emission reduction regulations. The
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) is an allowance cap and trade program requiring
further reductions in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions
from coal-burning power plants. The Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) is an
allowance cap and trade program requiring further reductions in mercury
emissions from coal-burning power plants. Both sets of regulations require
emission reductions in two phases. The first phase deadline for both rules
is 2010 (2009 for NOx under CAIR), and the second phase deadline for compliance
with the emission reductions required under CAIR is 2015, while the second phase
deadline for compliance with the emission reduction requirements of CAMR is
2018. However, on February 8, 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia vacated the federal CAMR regulations. At this
time it is uncertain how this decision will affect Indiana’s recently finalized
CAMR implementation program.
To comply
with Indiana’s implementation plan of the Clean Air Act of 1990 and to further
comply with CAIR and CAMR of 2005, SIGECO has received authority from the IURC
to invest in clean coal technology. Using this authorization, SIGECO has
invested approximately $307 million in pollution control equipment, including
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems and fabric filters. SCR
technology is the most effective method of reducing NOx emissions where high
removal efficiencies are required and fabric filters control particulate matter
emissions. These investments were included in rate base for purposes
of determining new base rates that went into effect on August 15, 2007.
Prior to being included in base rates, return on investments made and recovery
of related operating expenses were recovered through a rider
mechanism.
Further,
the IURC granted SIGECO authority to invest in an SO2 scrubber
at its generating facility that is jointly owned with ALCOA (the Company’s
portion is 150 MW). The
order, as updated with an increased spending level, allows SIGECO to recover an
approximate 8 percent return on up to $92 million, excluding AFUDC, in capital
investments through a rider mechanism which is updated every six months for
actual costs incurred. The Company may file periodic updates with the
IURC requesting modification to the spending authority. As of March 31,
2008, the Company has invested approximately $62 million in this
project. The Company expects the SO2 scrubber
will be operational in 2009. At that time, operating expenses
including depreciation expense associated with the scrubber will also be
recovered through a rider mechanism.
Once the
SO2
scrubber is operational, SIGECO’s coal fired generating fleet will be 100
percent scrubbed for SO2 and 90
percent controlled for NOx, and mercury emissions will be reduced to meet the
CAMR
mercury
reduction standards described in the original 2005 emission reduction
regulations. The use of SCR technology positions the Company to be in
compliance with the CAIR deadlines specifying reductions in NOx emissions by
2009 and further reductions by 2015. SIGECO's investments in
scrubber, SCR and fabric filter technology should position it to comply
with reasonable mercury reduction requirements should CAMR regulations be
further modified.
If
legislation requiring reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases or
legislation mandating energy from renewable sources is adopted, such regulation
could substantially affect both the costs and operating characteristics of the
Company’s fossil fuel generating plants and nonutility coal mining
operations. At this time and in the absence of final legislation,
compliance costs and other effects associated with reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions or obtaining renewable energy sources remain
uncertain.
SIGECO is
studying renewable energy alternatives, and on April 9, 2007, filed a green
power rider in order to allow customers to purchase green power and to obtain
approval of a contract to purchase 30 MW of power generated by wind
energy. The wind contract has been approved by the
IURC. Future filings with the IURC with regard to new generation
and/or further environmental compliance plans will include evaluation of
potential carbon requirements.
Environmental Remediation
Efforts
In the
past, Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and others operated facilities for the manufacture of
gas. Given the availability of natural gas transported by pipelines,
these facilities have not been operated for many years. Under
currently applicable environmental laws and regulations, those that operated
these facilities may now be required to take remedial action if certain
contaminants are found above the regulatory thresholds at these
sites.
Indiana
Gas identified the existence, location, and certain general characteristics of
26 gas manufacturing and storage sites for which it may have some remedial
responsibility. Indiana Gas completed a remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at one of the sites under an agreed
order between Indiana Gas and the IDEM, and a Record of Decision was issued by
the IDEM in January 2000. Indiana Gas submitted the remainder of the
sites to the IDEM's Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) and is
currently conducting some level of remedial activities, including groundwater
monitoring at certain sites, where deemed appropriate, and will continue
remedial activities at the sites as appropriate and necessary.
Indiana
Gas accrued the estimated costs for further investigation, remediation,
groundwater monitoring, and related costs for the sites. While the
total costs that may be incurred in connection with addressing these sites
cannot be determined at this time, Indiana Gas has recorded costs that it
reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $21 million.
The
estimated accrued costs are limited to Indiana Gas’ share of the remediation
efforts. Indiana Gas has arrangements in place for 19 of the 26 sites
with other potentially responsible parties (PRP), which serve to limit Indiana
Gas’ share of response costs at these 19 sites to between 20 percent and 50
percent. With respect to insurance coverage, Indiana Gas has received
and recorded settlements from all known insurance carriers under insurance
policies in effect when these plants were in operation in an aggregate amount
approximating $20 million.
In
October 2002, SIGECO received a formal information request letter from the IDEM
regarding five manufactured gas plants that it owned and/or operated and were
not enrolled in the IDEM’s VRP. In October 2003, SIGECO filed
applications to enter four of the manufactured gas plant sites in IDEM's
VRP. The remaining site is currently being addressed in the VRP by
another Indiana utility. SIGECO added those four sites into the
renewal of the global Voluntary Remediation Agreement that Indiana Gas has in
place with IDEM for its manufactured gas plant sites. That renewal
was approved by the IDEM in February 2004. SIGECO is also named in a
lawsuit filed in federal district court in May 2007, involving another site
subject to potential environmental remediation efforts.
SIGECO
has filed a declaratory judgment action against its insurance carriers seeking a
judgment finding its carriers liable under the policies for coverage of further
investigation and any necessary remediation costs that SIGECO may accrue under
the VRP program and/or related to the site subject to the May 2007
lawsuit. While the total costs that may be incurred in connection
with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this time, SIGECO has
recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $8
million. With respect to insurance coverage, SIGECO has received and
recorded settlements from insurance carriers under insurance policies in effect
when these sites were in operation in an aggregate amount approximating the
costs it expects to incur.
Environmental
remediation costs related to Indiana Gas’ and SIGECO’s manufactured gas plants
and other sites have had no material impact on results of operations or
financial condition since costs recorded to date approximate PRP and insurance
settlement recoveries. While the Company’s utilities have recorded
all costs which they presently expect to incur in connection with activities at
these sites, it is possible that future events may require some level of
additional remedial activities which are not presently foreseen and those costs
may not be subject to PRP or insurance recovery.
13.
|
Rate
& Regulatory Matters
|
Vectren North (Indiana Gas
Company, Inc.) Gas Base Rate Order Received
On
February 13, 2008, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved
the settlement agreement reached in its Vectren North gas rate case. The
order provided for a base rate increase of $16.3 million and an ROE of 10.2
percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.8 percent on rate base of
approximately $793 million. The order also provides for the
recovery of $10.6 million of costs through separate cost recovery mechanisms
rather than base rates.
Further,
additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital
replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates
earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases. The accounting
treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds
used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after
the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates. To
qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $20 million
and the treatment cannot extend beyond four years on each project.
With this
order, the Company has in place for its North gas territory weather
normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas
cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing
gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity management
expense.
Vectren Energy Delivery of
Ohio, Inc. (VEDO) Gas Base Rate Case Filing
In
November 2007, the Company filed with the PUCO a request for an increase in its
base rates and charges for VEDO’s distribution business in its 17-county service
area in west central Ohio. The filing indicates that an increase in
base rates of approximately $27 million is necessary to cover the ongoing cost
of operating, maintaining and expanding the approximately 5,200-mile
distribution system used to serve 318,000 customers.
In
addition, the Company is seeking to increase the level of the monthly service
charge as well as extending the lost margin recovery mechanism currently in
place to be able to encourage customer conservation and is also seeking approval
of expanded conservation-oriented programs, such as rebate offerings on
high-efficiency natural gas appliances for existing and new home construction,
to help customers lower their natural gas bills. The Company is also
seeking approval of a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement
program.
The
Company anticipates an order from the PUCO in late 2008.
Vectren South (SIGECO)
Electric Base Rate Order Received
On August
15, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren
South electric rate case. The settlement agreement provides for an
approximate $60.8 million electric rate increase to cover the Company’s cost of
system growth, maintenance, safety and reliability. The settlement
provides for, among other things: recovery of ongoing costs and deferred costs
associated with the MISO; operations and maintenance (O&M) expense increases
related to managing the aging workforce, including the development of expanded
apprenticeship programs and the creation of defined training programs to ensure
proper knowledge transfer, safety and system stability; increased O&M
expense necessary to maintain and improve system reliability; benefit to
customers from the sale of wholesale power by Vectren’s sharing equally with
customers any profit earned above or below $10.5 million of wholesale power
margin; recovery of and return on the investment in past demand side management
programs to help encourage conservation during peak load periods; timely
recovery of the Company’s investment in certain new electric transmission
projects that benefit the MISO infrastructure; an overall rate of return of 7.32
percent on rate base of approximately $1,044 million and an allowed return on
equity (ROE) of 10.4 percent.
Vectren South (SIGECO) Gas
Base Rate Order Received
On August
1, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren
South gas rate case. The order provided for a base rate increase of $5.1
million and an ROE of 10.15 percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.20
percent on rate base of approximately $122 million. The settlement
also provides for the recovery of $2.6 million of costs through separate cost
recovery mechanisms rather than base rates.
Further,
additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital
replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates
earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases. The accounting
treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds
used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after
the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates. To
qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $3 million
and the treatment cannot extend beyond three years on each project.
With this
order, the Company now has in place for its South gas territory weather
normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas
cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing
gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity
expense.
Ohio Lost Margin
Recovery/Conservation Filings
In 2005,
the Company filed conservation programs and conservation adjustment trackers in
Ohio designed to help customers conserve energy and reduce their annual gas
bills. The proposed programs allow the recovery of costs promoting
the conservation of natural gas through conservation trackers that work in
tandem with a lost margin recovery mechanism. These mechanisms are
designed to allow the recovery of the distribution portion of rates from
residential and commercial customers based on the level of customer revenues
established in VEDO’s last general rate case.
In June
2007, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approved a settlement that
provides for the implementation of a lost margin recovery mechanism and a
related conservation program for VEDO. This order confirms the
guidance the PUCO previously provided in a September 2006
decision. The conservation program, as outlined in the September 2006
PUCO order and as affirmed in this order, provides for a two year, $2 million
total conservation program to be paid by the Company, as well as a sales
reconciliation rider intended to be a recovery mechanism for the difference
between the weather normalized revenues actually collected by the Company and
the revenues approved by the PUCO in the Company’s most recent rate
case. Approximately 60 percent of the Company’s Ohio customers are
eligible for the conservation programs. The Ohio Consumer Counselor
(OCC) and another intervener requested a rehearing of the June 2007 order and
the PUCO granted that request in order to have additional time to consider the
merits of the request. In accordance with accounting authorization
previously provided by the PUCO, the Company began recognizing the impact of the
September 2006 order on October 1, 2006, and has recognized cumulative revenues
of $5.6 million. The OCC appealed the PUCO’s accounting authorization
to the Ohio Supreme Court, but that appeal has been dismissed as premature
pending the PUCO’s consideration of issues raised in the OCC’s request for
rehearing. Since October 1, 2006, the Company has been ratably
accruing its $2 million commitment.
MISO
Since
February 2002 and with the IURC’s approval, the Company has been a member of the
Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), a FERC approved regional
transmission organization. The MISO serves the electrical transmission
needs of much of the Midwest and maintains operational control over the
Company’s electric transmission facilities as well as that of other Midwest
utilities.
Since
April 1, 2005, the Company has been an active participant in the MISO energy
markets, biddings its owned generation into the Day Ahead and Real Time markets
and procuring power for its retail customers at Locational Marginal Pricing
(LMP) as determined by the MISO market. The Company is typically in a net
sales position with MISO and is only occasionally in a net purchase
position. Net positions are determined on an hourly basis. When the
Company is a net seller such net revenues are included in Electric Utility revenues and
when the Company is a net purchaser such net purchases are included in Cost of fuel and purchased
power. The Company also receives transmission revenue that
results from other members’ use of the Company’s transmission
system. These revenues are also included in Electric Utility
revenues. Generally, costs charged by the MISO are recovered
via base rates or tracking mechanisms.
As a
result of MISO’s operational control over much of the Midwestern electric
transmission grid, including SIGECO’s transmission facilities, SIGECO’s
continued ability to import power, when necessary, and export power to the
wholesale market has been, and may continue to be, impacted. Given the
nature of MISO’s policies regarding use of transmission facilities, as well as
ongoing FERC initiatives, and a pending Day 3 market, where MISO plans to
provide bid-based regulation and contingency operating reserve markets, it is
difficult to predict near term operational impacts. In March 2008,
MISO announced that the Day 3 ancillary services market would begin in September
2008. The Company has asked the IURC to approve its participation in
Day 3 and to approve recovery of costs associated therewith.
The need
to expend capital for improvements to the transmission system, both to SIGECO’s
facilities as well as to those facilities of adjacent utilities, over the next
several years is expected to be significant. The Company will timely
recover its investment in certain new electric transmission projects that
benefit the MISO infrastructure at a FERC approved rate of return.
14.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
SFAS 157
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS
157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements; however, the standard will impact how
other fair value based GAAP is applied. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FSP FAS 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008. The Company adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008,
except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
as described in FSP FAS 157-2. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 did
not materially impact Vectren’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact
the application of SFAS 157 to its nonfinancial assets and liabilities will have
on its consolidated financial statements.
Vectren
measures certain financial instruments, primarily derivatives, at fair value on
a recurring basis. SFAS 157 defines a hierarchy for disclosing fair value
measurements based primarily on the level of public data used in determining
fair value. Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 inputs include inputs other than
Level 1 inputs that are directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3 inputs
include unobservable inputs using estimates and assumptions developed in-house,
which reflect what a market participant would use to determine fair value.
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities was determined using the
following inputs at March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value at
|
|
As
of March 31, 2008
|
|
December
31,
|
In
millions
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Level
1
|
|
Level
2
|
|
Level
3
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
assets/(liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated gas
supply contracts
|
$ 0.3
|
|
$ 0.3
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
Interest rate
related contracts
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(8.9)
|
Synfuel
related contracts
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
22.8
|
Other
|
0.9
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
0.9
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments and
other current assets
|
$ 1.2
|
|
$ 0.3
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 0.9
|
|
$ 25.4
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
8.9
|
Derivatives
classified as “other” and which are valued using level 3 valuation inputs, are
held by a cost-based and rate regulated utility. Gains and losses
associated with marking the instruments to market are recorded as a regulatory
asset or liability until recovered from ratepayers.
SFAS 159
Also on
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The Company did not choose to apply the option provided in
SFAS 159 to any of its eligible items; therefore, its adoption did not have any
impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of
operations.
15.
|
Impacts
of Recently Issued Accounting
Standards
|
SFAS 141 (Revised
2007)
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer of an entity (1) recognizes and measures the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree (2) recognizes and measures acquired goodwill or a bargain purchase
gain and (3) determines what information to disclose in its financial statements
in order to enable users to assess the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R applies to all transactions or other
events in which one entity acquires control of one or more businesses and
applies to all business entities. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to
business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt
SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009, and because the provisions of this standard are
applied prospectively, the impact to the Company cannot be determined until the
transactions occur.
SFAS 160
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS
160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that
require that the ownership percentages in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented separately from
the parent’s equity in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet; the
amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the
noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated income statement; that changes in the parent’s ownership
interest while it retains control over its subsidiary be accounted for
consistently; that when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained
noncontrolling equity investment be initially measured at fair value; and that
sufficient disclosure is made to clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160
applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except
for non-profit entities. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 31, 2008. Early adoption is not
permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, and is
currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its financial
statements and results of operations.
SFAS 161
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS
161). SFAS 161 enhances the current disclosures under SFAS 133 and
requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms
of underlying risk and accounting designation in order to better convey the
purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to
manage. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about
(a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and
its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. Tabular disclosure of fair value amounts and gains and
losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items is
required. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
adoption encouraged. The Company will adopt SFAS 161 on January 1,
2009 and is currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its
financial statements and results of operations.
The
Company segregates its operations into three groups: 1) Utility Group, 2)
Nonutility Group, and 3) Corporate and Other.
The
Utility Group is comprised of Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc.’s operations, which
consist of the Company’s regulated operations and other operations that provide
information technology and other support services to those regulated
operations. The Company segregates its regulated operations into a
Gas Utility Services operating segment and an Electric Utility Services
operating segment. The Gas Utility Services segment provides natural
gas distribution and transportation services to nearly two-thirds of Indiana and
to west central Ohio. The Electric Utility Services segment provides
electric distribution services primarily to southwestern Indiana, and includes
the Company’s power generating and wholesale marketing
operations. The Company manages its regulated operations as separated
between Energy Delivery, which includes the gas and electric transmission and
distribution functions, and Power Supply, which includes the power generating
and asset optimization operations. In total, regulated operations
supply natural gas and /or electricity to over one million
customers. In total, the Utility Group has three operating segments
as defined by SFAS 131 “Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information” (SFAS 131).
The
Nonutility Group is comprised of one operating segment as defined by SFAS 131
that includes various subsidiaries and affiliates investing in energy marketing
and services, coal mining, and energy infrastructure services, among other
energy-related opportunities.
Corporate
and Other includes unallocated corporate expenses such as advertising and
charitable contributions, among other activities, that benefit the Company’s
other operating segments. Net income is the measure of profitability
used by management for all operations. Information related to the
Company’s business segments is summarized below:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
Utility Services
|
|
$ |
633.6 |
|
|
$ |
584.1 |
|
Electric
Utility Services
|
|
|
127.2 |
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
Other
Operations
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
Total
Utility Group
|
|
|
761.4 |
|
|
|
692.6 |
|
Nonutility
Group
|
|
|
169.7 |
|
|
|
169.3 |
|
Corporate
& Other Group
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
Consolidated
Revenues
|
|
$ |
902.1 |
|
|
$ |
834.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability
Measure - Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
Utility Services
|
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
Electric
Utility Services
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Other
Operations
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Utility
Group Net Income
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
Nonutility
Group Net Income
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Corporate
& Other Group Net Income
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Consolidated
Net Income
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utility
Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
Utility Services
|
|
$ |
1,987.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,049.1 |
|
Electric
Utility Services
|
|
|
1,376.3 |
|
|
|
1,369.2 |
|
Other
Operations
|
|
|
236.0 |
|
|
|
245.7 |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(65.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
Total
Utility Group
|
|
$ |
3,534.4 |
|
|
|
3,643.7 |
|
Nonutility
Group
|
|
|
633.1 |
|
|
|
704.1 |
|
Corporate
& Other
|
|
|
439.1 |
|
|
|
407.0 |
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(456.6 |
) |
|
|
(458.3 |
) |
Consolidated
Assets
|
|
$ |
4,150.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,296.4 |
|
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
Description of the
Business
Vectren
Corporation (the Company or Vectren), an Indiana corporation, is an energy
holding company headquartered in Evansville, Indiana. The Company’s
wholly owned subsidiary, Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. (Utility Holdings),
serves as the intermediate holding company for three operating public
utilities: Indiana Gas Company, Inc. (Indiana Gas or Vectren North),
Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company (SIGECO or Vectren South), and the
Ohio operations (VEDO or Vectren Ohio). Utility Holdings also has
other assets that provide information technology and other services to the three
utilities. Utility Holdings’ consolidated operations are collectively
referred to as the Utility Group. Both Vectren and Utility Holdings
are holding companies as defined by the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Energy
Act). Vectren was incorporated under the laws of Indiana on June 10,
1999.
Indiana
Gas provides energy delivery services to over 569,000 natural gas customers
located in central and southern Indiana. SIGECO provides energy
delivery services to over 141,000 electric customers and approximately 112,000
gas customers located near Evansville in southwestern Indiana. SIGECO
also owns and operates electric generation to serve its electric customers and
optimizes those assets in the wholesale power market. Indiana Gas and
SIGECO generally do business as Vectren Energy Delivery of
Indiana. The Ohio operations provide energy delivery services to
approximately 319,000 natural gas customers located near Dayton in west central
Ohio. The Ohio operations are owned as a tenancy in common by Vectren
Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc. (VEDO), a wholly owned subsidiary of Utility
Holdings (53 percent ownership), and Indiana Gas (47 percent
ownership). The Ohio operations generally do business as Vectren
Energy Delivery of Ohio.
The
Company, through Vectren Enterprises, Inc. (Enterprises), is involved in
nonutility activities in three primary business areas: Energy
Marketing and Services, Coal Mining and Energy Infrastructure
Services. Energy Marketing and Services markets and supplies natural
gas and provides energy management services. Coal Mining mines and
sells coal. Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground
construction and repair services and performance contracting and renewable
energy services. Enterprises also has other businesses that invest in
energy-related opportunities and services, real estate, and leveraged leases,
among other investments. These operations are collectively referred
to as the Nonutility Group. Enterprises
supports the Company’s regulated utilities pursuant to service contracts by
providing natural gas supply services, coal, infrastructure services, and other
services.
In this
discussion and analysis, the Company analyzes contributions to consolidated
earnings from its Utility Group and Nonutility Group separately since each
operate independently requiring distinct competencies and business strategies,
offers different energy and energy related products and services, and
experiences different opportunities and risks. Nonutility Group
operations are discussed below as primary operations, other operations, and
synfuel-related results. Primary nonutility operations denote areas
of management’s forward looking focus. Tax laws authorizing tax
credits for the production of certain synthetic fuels expired on December 31,
2007, and should not have a material impact on future results.
Per
share earnings contributions of the Utility Group, Nonutility Group, and
Corporate and Other are presented. Such per share amounts are based
on the earnings contribution of each group included in Vectren’s
consolidated results divided by Vectren’s basic average shares outstanding
during the period. The earnings per share of the groups do not
represent a direct legal interest in the assets and liabilities allocated
to the groups, but rather represent a direct equity interest in Vectren
Corporation's assets and liabilities as a
whole.
|
The
Utility Group generates revenue primarily from the delivery of natural gas and
electric service to its customers. The primary source of cash flow for the
Utility Group results from the collection of customer bills and the payment for
goods and services procured for the delivery of gas and electric services.
The activities of and revenues and cash flows generated by the Nonutility Group
are closely linked to the utility industry, and the results of those operations
are generally impacted by factors similar to those impacting the overall utility
industry. In addition, there are other operations, referred to herein
as Corporate and Other, that include unallocated corporate expenses such as
advertising and charitable contributions, among other activities.
The Company has in place a disclosure
committee that consists of senior management as well as financial
management. The committee is actively involved in the preparation and
review of the Company’s SEC filings.
Executive Summary of
Consolidated Results of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as
well as the Company’s 2007 annual report filed on Form
10-K.
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions, except per share data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
Attributed
to:
|
Utility
Group
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
Nonutility
Group
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
Corporate
& other
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Attributed
to:
|
Utility
Group
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Nonutility Group
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Corporate & other
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Results
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, net income was $64.0 million, or $0.84 per
share, compared to $70.1 million, or $0.92 per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. While utility results increased
significantly year over year primarily as a result of the implementation
of base rate increases, results reflect decreased earnings from nonutility
operations, primarily Energy Marketing and Services and Coal Mining and are
reflective of the end of Synfuel-related activities.
Utility
Group
In 2008,
the Utility Group’s earnings were $58.0 million compared to $50.9 million in
2007, an increase of $7.1 million or $0.09 per share. The increase
resulted primarily from the impact of regulatory initiatives, including base
rate increases in the Indiana service territories, and increased earnings from
the sale of wholesale power. The increase was offset somewhat by
higher operating costs related to increasing maintenance and reliability costs
contemplated in the base rate cases.
In the
Company’s electric and Ohio natural gas service territories which are not
protected by weather normalization mechanisms, management estimates the impact
of weather on margin experienced during the first quarter of 2008 to be $0.8
million favorable compared to 30-year normal temperatures. In 2007,
management estimated the margin impact of warmer-than-normal weather to be $0.6
million unfavorable. Year over year, the $1.4 million favorable
margin impact increased earnings approximately $0.01 per share.
Nonutility
Group
The
Nonutility Group’s year to date 2008 earnings were $6.3 million compared to
$19.0 million in 2007. In 2007, the last year of synfuel operations,
synfuel-related results generated earnings of $3.4 million, or $0.04 per share
for the three months ended March 31, 2007. All other Nonutility
Group results decreased $9.3 million, or
$0.13 per share, as compared to last year’s results. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower ProLiance Holdings, LLC (ProLiance) and Coal
Mining earnings.
Dividends
Dividends
declared for the three months ended March 31, 2008, were $0.325 per share
compared to $0.315 per share for the same period in 2007.
Detailed
Discussion of Results of Operations
Following
is a more detailed discussion of the results of operations of the Company’s
Utility and Nonutility operations. The detailed results of operations
for these operations are presented and analyzed before the reclassification and
elimination of certain intersegment transactions necessary to consolidate those
results into the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
Results of Operations of the
Utility Group
The
Utility Group is comprised of Utility Holdings’ operations. The
operations of the Utility Group consist of the Company’s regulated operations
and other operations that provide information technology and other support
services to those regulated operations. The Company segregates its
regulated operations into a Gas Utility Services operating segment and an
Electric Utility Services operating segment. The Gas Utility Services
segment includes the operations of Indiana Gas, the Ohio operations, and
SIGECO’s natural gas distribution business and provides natural gas distribution
and transportation services to nearly two-thirds of Indiana and to west central
Ohio. The Electric Utility Services segment includes the operations
of SIGECO’s electric transmission and distribution services, which provides
electric distribution services primarily to southwestern Indiana, and the
Company’s power generating and asset optimization operations. In
total, these regulated operations supply natural gas and/or electricity to over
one million customers. Utility operating results before certain
intersegment eliminations and reclassifications for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007 follow:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions, except per share data)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
OPERATING
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
utility
|
|
$ |
633.6 |
|
|
$ |
584.1 |
|
Electric
utility
|
|
|
127.2 |
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
Other
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Total
operating revenues
|
|
|
761.4 |
|
|
|
692.6 |
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of gas sold
|
|
|
462.0 |
|
|
|
424.5 |
|
Cost
of fuel & purchased power
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
Other
operating
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
67.2 |
|
Depreciation
& amortization
|
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
Taxes
other than income taxes
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
648.9 |
|
|
|
595.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
INCOME
|
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME - NET
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME
|
|
$ |
58.0 |
|
|
$ |
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTION
TO VECTREN BASIC EPS
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Significant
Fluctuations
Utility Group
Margin
Throughout
this discussion, the terms Gas Utility margin and Electric Utility margin are
used. Gas Utility margin is calculated as Gas Utility revenues less the
Cost of gas
sold. Electric Utility margin is calculated as Electric Utility revenues
less Cost of fuel &
purchased power. These measures exclude Other operating expenses,
Depreciation and amortization, and Taxes other than income
taxes, which are included in the calculation of operating
income. The Company believes Gas Utility and Electric Utility margins
are better indicators of relative contribution than revenues since gas prices
and fuel costs can be volatile and are generally collected on a
dollar-for-dollar basis from customers.
Sales of
natural gas and electricity to residential and commercial customers are seasonal
and are impacted by weather. Trends in average use among natural gas
residential and commercial customers have tended to decline in recent years as
more efficient appliances and furnaces are installed and the price of natural
gas has increased. Normal temperature adjustment (NTA) and lost margin
recovery mechanisms largely mitigate the effect on Gas Utility margin that would
otherwise be caused by variations in volumes sold due to weather and changing
consumption patterns. Indiana Gas’ territory has both an NTA since 2005
and lost margin recovery since December 2006. SIGECO’s natural gas
territory has an NTA since 2005, and lost margin recovery began when new base
rates went into effect August 1, 2007. The Ohio service territory has lost
margin recovery since October 2006, but does not have an NTA mechanism.
SIGECO’s electric service territory does not have an NTA mechanism but has
recovery of past demand side management costs.
Gas and
electric margin generated from sales to large customers (generally industrial
and other contract customers) is primarily impacted by overall economic
conditions. Margin is also impacted by the collection of state mandated
taxes, which fluctuate with gas and fuel costs, as well as other tracked
expenses. Expenses subject to tracking mechanisms include Ohio bad
debts and percent of income payment plan expenses, Indiana gas pipeline
integrity management costs, and costs to fund Indiana energy efficiency
programs. Certain operating costs associated with operating
environmental compliance equipment were also tracked prior to their recovery in
base rates that went into effect on August 15, 2007. The latest
Indiana service territory rate cases, implemented in 2007 and 2008 also provide
for the tracking of MISO revenues and costs, as well as the gas cost component
of bad debt expense and unaccounted for gas. Unaccounted for gas is
also tracked in the Ohio service territory. Electric generating asset
optimization activities are primarily affected by market conditions, the level
of excess generating capacity, and electric transmission availability.
Following is a discussion and analysis of margin generated from regulated
utility operations.
Gas
Utility Margin (Gas Utility revenues less Cost of gas sold)
Gas
Utility margin and throughput by customer type follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
utility revenues
|
|
$ |
633.6 |
|
|
$ |
584.1 |
|
Cost
of gas sold
|
|
|
462.0 |
|
|
|
424.5 |
|
Total
gas utility margin
|
|
$ |
171.6 |
|
|
$ |
159.6 |
|
Margin
attributed to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
& commercial customers
|
|
$ |
150.9 |
|
|
$ |
140.3 |
|
Industrial
customers
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Sold
& transported volumes in MMDth attributed to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
& commercial customers
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
Industrial
customers
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Total
sold & transported volumes
|
|
|
86.5 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
For the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, gas utility margins were $171.6 million, an
increase of $12.0 million over the prior year. Margin increases
associated with the Vectren North base rate increase, effective February 14,
2008, were $2.7 million. Margin increases associated with the Vectren
South base rate increase, effective August 1, 2007, were $2.6
million. Year to date 2008, Ohio weather was 3 percent colder than
the prior year and resulted in an estimated increase in margin of approximately
$1.2 million compared to 2007. Operating costs, including revenue and
usage taxes recovered dollar-for-dollar in margin, increased gas margin $3.4
million year over year. The remaining increase is related primarily
to lost margin recovery mechanisms. The average cost per dekatherm of
gas purchased for the three months ended March 31, 2008, was $9.44 compared to
$8.85 in 2007.
Electric
Utility Margin (Electric Utility revenues less Cost of fuel & purchased
power)
Electric
Utility margin by revenue type follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
utility revenues
|
|
$ |
127.2 |
|
|
$ |
108.1 |
|
Cost
of fuel & purchased power
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
Total
electric utility margin
|
|
$ |
81.2 |
|
|
$ |
67.5 |
|
Margin
attributed to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
& commercial customers
|
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
Industrial
customers
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Municipal
& other customers
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Subtotal:
retail & firm wholesale
|
|
$ |
73.1 |
|
|
$ |
61.4 |
|
Wholesale
Power Marketing
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
volumes sold in GWh attributed to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
& commercial customers
|
|
|
715.2 |
|
|
|
697.9 |
|
Industrial
customers
|
|
|
600.7 |
|
|
|
627.0 |
|
Municipal
& other
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
135.1 |
|
Total
retail & firm wholesale volumes sold
|
|
|
1,352.5 |
|
|
|
1,460.0 |
|
Retail
Margin
Electric
retail and firm wholesale utility margins were $73.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, an increase over the prior year of $11.7
million. The base rate increase that went into effect on August 15,
2007, produced incremental margin of $13.1 million. Management
estimates the year over year increases in usage by residential and commercial
customers due to weather to be $0.2 million. Offsetting these
increases is the expiration of certain firm wholesale municipal contracts which
generated margin of $2.2 million in 2007. The remaining increase is
primarily attributable to pricing, including $0.7 million in recovery of
pollution control investments and other items.
Margin
from Wholesale Power Marketing Activity
Periodically,
generation capacity is in excess of that needed to serve native
load. The Company markets and sells this unutilized generating and
transmission capacity to optimize the return on its owned assets. On
an annual basis, a majority of the margin generated from these activities is
associated with wholesale off-system sales into the MISO Day Ahead
market.
Following
is a reconciliation of Wholesale Power Marketing
activity:
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Off-system
sales
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
Transmission
system sales
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Total
Wholesale Power Marketing
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
Wholesale
power marketing margins were $8.1 million for the first quarter of 2008, an
increase of $2.0 million over the prior year. Certain firm wholesale
municipal contracts have been allowed to expire and the associated volumes are
being used to meet retail peak reserve requirements. The increase in
wholesale power marketing margins is due to the increase in off peak volumes
available for sale off system and an increase in wholesale
prices. Off-system sales totaled 461.3 GWh in 2008, compared to 260.5
GWh in 2007.
Utility Group Operating
Expenses
Other
Operating Expenses
For
the three months ended March 31, 2008, other operating expenses were $74.0
million, an increase of $6.8 million, compared to 2007. Costs
resulting from increased maintenance and other activities contemplated in rate
cases, including amortization of prior deferred costs, totaled $5.0 million in
2008. Pass-through costs that are recovered in utility margin
increased $2.1 million year over year.
Depreciation
& Amortization
Depreciation
expense was $40.7 million for the quarter, an increase of $1.5 million compared
to 2007. The increase relates to the addition of plant and the
amortization
in 2008
associated with prior electric demand side management costs pursuant to the
August 15,
2007 electric base rate order.
Taxes
Other Than Income Taxes
Taxes
other than income taxes were $26.2 million for the quarter, an increase of $2.0
million compared to the prior year quarter. The increase is primarily
attributable to $1.5 million in additional utility receipts, excise, and usage
taxes as a result of volatility. In 2008, property taxes increased
due to increased plant in service.
Other
Income-Net
Other-net reflects income of $2.0
million for the quarter, a decrease of $0.7 million compared to the prior year
quarter. The decrease is primarily attributable to $0.4 million in
lower capitalization of funds used during construction.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense was $20.8 million for the quarter, an increase of $1.4 million compared
to the prior year quarter. The increase reflects higher average short
term debt balances and the impact of long term financing transactions completed
during the first quarter, including the issuance of $125 million in senior
unsecured notes at 6.25 percent due in 2039 and the short-term refinancing of
approximately $103 million of auction rate mode debt. Of that amount,
$62 million was remarketed in March 2008 at fixed interest rates and the
remaining $41 million will be remarketed at a future date. The impact
of declining short-term interest rates helped offset these
increases.
Income
Taxes
In 2008,
federal and state income taxes were $35.7 million for the quarter, an increase
of $6.4 million compared to the prior year quarter. The higher taxes
are primarily due to higher pretax income.
Environmental
Matters
Clean Air/Climate
Change
In March
of 2005 USEPA finalized two new air emission reduction regulations. The
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) is an allowance cap and trade program requiring
further reductions in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions
from coal-burning power plants. The Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) is an
allowance cap and trade program requiring further reductions in mercury
emissions from coal-burning power plants. Both sets of regulations require
emission reductions in two phases. The first phase deadline for both rules
is 2010 (2009 for NOx under CAIR), and the second phase deadline for compliance
with the emission reductions required under CAIR is 2015, while the second phase
deadline for compliance with the emission reduction requirements of CAMR is
2018. However, on February 8, 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia vacated the federal CAMR regulations. At this
time it is uncertain how this decision will affect Indiana’s recently finalized
CAMR implementation program.
To comply
with Indiana’s implementation plan of the Clean Air Act of 1990 and to further
comply with CAIR and CAMR of 2005, SIGECO has received authority from the IURC
to invest in clean coal technology. Using this authorization, SIGECO has
invested approximately $307 million in pollution control equipment, including
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems and fabric filters. SCR
technology is the most effective method of reducing NOx emissions where high
removal efficiencies are required and fabric filters control particulate matter
emissions. These investments were included in rate base for purposes
of determining new base rates that went into effect on August 15, 2007.
Prior to being included in base rates, return on investments made and recovery
of related operating expenses were recovered through a rider
mechanism.
Further,
the IURC granted SIGECO authority to invest in an SO2 scrubber
at its generating facility that is jointly owned with ALCOA (the Company’s
portion is 150 MW). The
order, as updated with an increased spending level, allows SIGECO to recover an
approximate 8 percent return on up to $92 million, excluding AFUDC, in capital
investments through a rider mechanism which is updated every six months for
actual costs incurred. The Company may file periodic updates with the
IURC requesting modification to the spending authority. As of March 31,
2008, the Company has invested approximately $62 million in this
project. The Company expects the SO2 scrubber
will be operational in 2009. At that time, operating expenses
including depreciation expense associated with the scrubber will also be
recovered through a rider mechanism.
Once the
SO2
scrubber is operational, SIGECO’s coal fired generating fleet will be 100
percent scrubbed for SO2 and 90
percent controlled for NOx, and mercury emissions will be reduced to meet the
CAMR mercury reduction standards described in the original 2005 emission
reduction regulations. The use of SCR technology positions the
Company to be in compliance with the CAIR deadlines specifying reductions in NOx
emissions by 2009 and further reductions by 2015. SIGECO's
investments in scrubber, SCR and fabric filter technology should position it to
comply with reasonable mercury reduction requirements should CAMR regulations be
further modified.
If
legislation requiring reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases or
legislation mandating energy from renewable sources is adopted, such regulation
could substantially affect both the costs and operating characteristics of the
Company’s fossil fuel generating plants and nonutility coal mining
operations. At this time and in the absence of final legislation,
compliance costs and other effects associated with reductions in greenhouse gas
emissions or obtaining renewable energy sources remain
uncertain.
SIGECO is
studying renewable energy alternatives, and on April 9, 2007, filed a green
power rider in order to allow customers to purchase green power and to obtain
approval of a contract to purchase 30 MW of power generated by wind
energy. The wind contract has been approved. Future
filings with the IURC with regard to new generation and/or further environmental
compliance plans will include evaluation of potential carbon
requirements.
Manufactured Gas
Plants
In the
past, Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and others operated facilities for the manufacture of
gas. Given the availability of natural gas transported by pipelines,
these facilities have not been operated for many years. Under
currently applicable environmental laws and regulations, those that operated
these facilities may now be required to take remedial action if certain
contaminants are found above the regulatory thresholds at these
sites.
Indiana
Gas identified the existence, location, and certain general characteristics of
26 gas manufacturing and storage sites for which it may have some remedial
responsibility. Indiana Gas completed a remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at one of the sites under an agreed
order between Indiana Gas and the IDEM, and a Record of Decision was issued by
the IDEM in January 2000. Indiana Gas submitted the remainder of the
sites to the IDEM's Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) and is
currently conducting some level of remedial activities, including groundwater
monitoring at certain sites, where deemed appropriate, and will continue
remedial activities at the sites as appropriate and necessary.
Indiana
Gas accrued the estimated costs for further investigation, remediation,
groundwater monitoring, and related costs for the sites. While the
total costs that may be incurred in connection with addressing these sites
cannot be determined at this time, Indiana Gas has recorded costs that it
reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $21 million.
The
estimated accrued costs are limited to Indiana Gas’ share of the remediation
efforts. Indiana Gas has arrangements in place for 19 of the 26 sites
with other potentially responsible parties (PRP), which serve to limit Indiana
Gas’ share of response costs at these 19 sites to between 20 percent and 50
percent. With respect to insurance coverage, Indiana Gas has received
and recorded settlements from all known insurance carriers under insurance
policies in effect when these plants were in operation in an aggregate amount
approximating $20 million.
In
October 2002, SIGECO received a formal information request letter from the IDEM
regarding five manufactured gas plants that it owned and/or operated and were
not enrolled in the IDEM’s VRP. In October 2003, SIGECO filed
applications to enter four of the manufactured gas plant sites in IDEM's
VRP. The remaining site is currently being addressed in the VRP by
another Indiana utility. SIGECO added those four sites into the
renewal of the global Voluntary Remediation Agreement that Indiana Gas has in
place with IDEM for its manufactured gas plant sites. That renewal
was approved by the IDEM in February 2004. SIGECO is also named in a
lawsuit filed in federal district court in May 2007, involving another site
subject to potential environmental remediation efforts.
SIGECO
has filed a declaratory judgment action against its insurance carriers seeking a
judgment finding its carriers liable under the policies for coverage of further
investigation and any necessary remediation costs that SIGECO may accrue under
the VRP program and/or related to the site subject to the May 2007
lawsuit. While the total costs that may be incurred in connection
with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this time, SIGECO has
recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur totaling approximately $8
million. With respect to insurance coverage, SIGECO has received and
recorded settlements from insurance carriers under insurance policies in effect
when these sites were in operation in an aggregate amount approximating the
costs it expects to incur.
Environmental
remediation costs related to Indiana Gas’ and SIGECO’s manufactured gas plants
and other sites have had no material impact on results of operations or
financial condition since costs recorded to date approximate PRP and insurance
settlement recoveries. While the Company’s utilities have recorded
all costs which they presently expect to incur in connection with activities at
these sites, it is possible that future events may require some level of
additional remedial activities which are not presently foreseen and those costs
may not be subject to PRP or insurance recovery.
Rate and Regulatory
Matters
Vectren North (Indiana Gas
Company, Inc.) Gas Base Rate Order Received
On
February 13, 2008, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved
the settlement agreement reached in its Vectren North gas rate case. The
order provided for a base rate increase of $16.3 million and an ROE of 10.2
percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.8 percent on rate base of
approximately $793 million. The order also provides for the recovery
of $10.6 million of costs through separate cost recovery mechanisms rather than
base rates.
Further,
additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital
replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates
earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases. The accounting
treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds
used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after
the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates. To
qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $20 million
and the treatment cannot extend beyond four years on each project.
With this
order, the Company has in place for its North gas territory weather
normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas
cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing
gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity management
expense.
Vectren Energy Delivery of
Ohio, Inc. (VEDO) Gas Base Rate Case Filing
In
November 2007, the Company filed with the PUCO a request for an increase in its
base rates and charges for VEDO’s distribution business in its 17-county service
area in west central Ohio. The filing indicates that an increase in
base rates of approximately $27 million is necessary to cover the ongoing cost
of operating, maintaining and expanding the approximately 5,200-mile
distribution system used to serve 318,000 customers.
In
addition, the Company is seeking to increase the level of the monthly service
charge as well as extending the lost margin recovery mechanism currently in
place to be able to encourage customer conservation and is also seeking approval
of expanded conservation-oriented programs, such as rebate offerings on
high-efficiency natural gas appliances for existing and new home construction,
to help customers lower their natural gas bills. The Company is also
seeking approval of a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital replacement
program.
The
Company anticipates an order from the PUCO in late 2008.
Vectren South (SIGECO)
Electric Base Rate Order Received
On August
15, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren
South electric rate case. The settlement agreement provides for an
approximate $60.8 million electric rate increase to cover the Company’s cost of
system growth, maintenance, safety and reliability. The settlement
provides for, among other things: recovery of ongoing costs and deferred costs
associated with the MISO; operations and maintenance (O&M) expense increases
related to managing the aging workforce, including the development of expanded
apprenticeship programs and the creation of defined training programs to ensure
proper knowledge transfer, safety and system stability; increased O&M
expense necessary to maintain and improve system reliability; benefit to
customers from the sale of wholesale power by Vectren’s sharing equally with
customers any profit earned above or below $10.5 million of wholesale power
margin; recovery of and return on the investment in past demand side management
programs to help encourage conservation during peak load periods; timely
recovery of the Company’s investment in certain new electric transmission
projects that benefit the MISO infrastructure; an overall rate of return of 7.32
percent on rate base of approximately $1,044 million and an allowed return on
equity (ROE) of 10.4 percent. The increase in Electric Utility margin as a
result of this order totaled $17.9 million in 2007.
Vectren South (SIGECO) Gas
Base Rate Order Received
On August
1, 2007, the Company received an order from the IURC which approved its Vectren
South gas rate case. The order provided for a base rate increase of $5.1
million and an ROE of 10.15 percent, with an overall rate of return of 7.20
percent on rate base of approximately $122 million. The settlement
also provides for the recovery of $2.6 million of costs through separate cost
recovery mechanisms rather than base rates.
Further,
additional expenditures for a multi-year bare steel and cast iron capital
replacement program will be afforded certain accounting treatment that mitigates
earnings attrition from the investment between rate cases. The accounting
treatment allows for the continuation of the accrual for allowance for funds
used during construction (AFUDC) and the deferral of depreciation expense after
the projects go in service but before they are included in base rates. To
qualify for this treatment, the annual expenditures are limited to $3 million
and the treatment cannot extend beyond three years on each project.
With this
order, the Company now has in place for its South gas territory weather
normalization, a conservation and lost margin recovery tariff, tracking of gas
cost expense related to bad debts and unaccounted for gas through the existing
gas cost adjustment mechanism, and tracking of pipeline integrity
expense.
Ohio Lost Margin
Recovery/Conservation Filings
In 2005,
the Company filed conservation programs and conservation adjustment trackers in
Ohio designed to help customers conserve energy and reduce their annual gas
bills. The proposed programs allow the recovery of costs promoting
the conservation of natural gas through conservation trackers that work in
tandem with a lost margin recovery mechanism. These mechanisms are
designed to allow the recovery of the distribution portion of rates from
residential and commercial customers based on the level of customer revenues
established in VEDO’s last general rate case.
In June
2007, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approved a settlement that
provides for the implementation of a lost margin recovery mechanism and a
related conservation program for VEDO. This order confirms the
guidance the PUCO previously provided in a September 2006
decision. The conservation program, as outlined in the September 2006
PUCO order and as affirmed in this order, provides for a two year, $2 million
total conservation program to be paid by the Company, as well as a sales
reconciliation rider intended to be a recovery mechanism for the difference
between the weather normalized revenues actually collected by the Company and
the revenues approved by the PUCO in the Company’s most recent rate
case. Approximately 60 percent of the Company’s Ohio customers are
eligible for the conservation programs. The Ohio Consumer Counselor
(OCC) and another intervener requested a rehearing of the June 2007 order and
the PUCO granted that request in order to have additional time to consider the
merits of the request. In accordance with accounting authorization
previously provided by the PUCO, the Company began recognizing the impact of the
September 2006 order on October 1, 2006, and has recognized cumulative revenues
of $5.6 million. The OCC appealed the PUCO’s accounting authorization
to the Ohio Supreme Court, but that appeal has been dismissed as premature
pending the PUCO’s consideration of issues raised in the OCC’s request for
rehearing. Since October 1, 2006, the Company has been ratably
accruing its $2 million commitment.
MISO
Since
February 2002 and with the IURC’s approval, the Company has been a member of the
Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), a FERC approved regional
transmission organization. The MISO serves the electrical transmission
needs of much of the Midwest and maintains operational control over the
Company’s electric transmission facilities as well as that of other Midwest
utilities.
Since
April 1, 2005, the Company has been an active participant in the MISO energy
markets, biddings its owned generation into the Day Ahead and Real Time markets
and procuring power for its retail customers at Locational Marginal Pricing
(LMP) as determined by the MISO market. The Company is typically in a net
sales position with MISO and is only occasionally in a net purchase
position. Net positions are determined on an hourly basis. When the
Company is a net seller such net revenues are included in Electric Utility revenues and
when the Company is a net purchaser such net purchases are included in Cost of fuel and purchased
power. The Company also receives transmission revenue that
results from other members’ use of the Company’s transmission
system. These revenues are also included in Electric Utility
revenues. Generally, costs charged by the MISO are recovered
via base rates or tracking mechanisms.
As a
result of MISO’s operational control over much of the Midwestern electric
transmission grid, including SIGECO’s transmission facilities, SIGECO’s
continued ability to import power, when necessary, and export power to the
wholesale market has been, and may continue to be, impacted. Given the
nature of MISO’s policies regarding use of transmission facilities, as well as
ongoing FERC initiatives, and a pending Day 3 market, where MISO plans to
provide bid-based regulation and contingency operating reserve markets, it is
difficult to predict near term operational impacts. In March 2008,
MISO announced that the Day 3 ancillary services market would begin in September
2008. The Company has asked the IURC to approve its participation in
Day 3 and to approve recovery of costs associated therewith.
The need
to expend capital for improvements to the transmission system, both to SIGECO’s
facilities as well as to those facilities of adjacent utilities, over the next
several years is expected to be significant. The Company will timely
recover its investment in certain new electric transmission projects that
benefit the MISO infrastructure at a FERC approved rate of return.
Results of Operations of the
Nonutility Group
The
Nonutility Group operates in three primary business areas: Energy Marketing and
Services, Coal Mining, and Energy Infrastructure Services. Energy
Marketing and Services markets and supplies natural gas and provides energy
management services. Coal Mining mines and sells
coal. Energy Infrastructure Services provides underground
construction and repair and provides performance contracting and renewable
energy services. There are also other businesses that invest in
energy-related opportunities and services, real estate, and leveraged leases,
among other investments. The Nonutility Group supports the Company’s
regulated utilities pursuant to service contracts by providing natural gas
supply services, coal, infrastructure services, and other
services. Nonutility Group earnings for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and 2007, follow:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
(In
millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTION
TO VECTREN BASIC EPS
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCOME ATTRIBUTED TO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Marketing & Services
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
Mining
Operations
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Energy
Infrastructure
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Other
Businesses
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Synfuel-related
results
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Primary
nonutility operations contributed earnings of $4.9 million in the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, as compared to $15.3 million in 2007. Primary
nonutility operations include Energy Marketing and Services companies, Coal
Mining operations, and Energy Infrastructure Services
companies.
Energy
Marketing and Services
Energy
Marketing and Services is comprised of the Company’s gas marketing operations,
energy management services, and retail gas supply operations. Net
income, inclusive of holding company costs, generated by Energy Marketing and
Services for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, was $9.0 million compared to
$15.7 million in 2007.
ProLiance
ProLiance,
a nonutility energy marketing affiliate of Vectren and Citizens Gas and Coke
Utility (Citizens Gas), provides services to a broad range of municipalities,
utilities, industrial operations, schools, and healthcare institutions located
throughout the Midwest and Southeast United States. ProLiance’s
customers include Vectren’s Indiana utilities and nonutility gas supply
operations and Citizens Gas. ProLiance’s primary businesses include
gas marketing, gas portfolio optimization, and other portfolio and energy
management services. Consistent with its ownership percentage,
Vectren is allocated 61 percent of ProLiance’s profits and losses; however,
governance and voting rights remain at 50 percent for each member; and therefore
the Company accounts for its investment in ProLiance using the equity method of
accounting. Vectren received regulatory approval on April 25, 2006,
from the IURC for ProLiance to continue to provide natural gas supply services
to the Company’s Indiana utilities through March 2011.
ProLiance’s
earnings contribution totaled $7.8 million in 2008 compared to $15.2 million in
2007. In 2008, recent lower volatility in the wholesale natural gas
markets has more than offset the effect of increased storage
capacity. ProLiance’s storage capacity was 40 BCF in 2008 compared to
35 BCF in March 2007 and 40 BCF at December 31, 2007. Firm storage
capacity will increase to 47 Bcf by the end of 2008. The Company
expects that ProLiance’s results may be further impacted in 2008 due to the
more recent lower price volatility.
Regulatory
Matter
ProLiance
self-reported to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the
Commission) in October 2007 possible non-compliance with the Commission’s
capacity release policies. ProLiance has taken corrective actions to
assure that current and future transactions are compliant. ProLiance is
committed to full regulatory compliance and is cooperating fully with the FERC
regarding these issues. ProLiance is unable to predict the outcome of any
FERC action.
Vectren
Source
Vectren
Retail, LLC (d/b/a Vectren Source), a wholly owned subsidiary, provides natural
gas and other related products and services to customers opting for choice among
energy providers. Vectren Source earned $2.0 million in 2008 compared
to $0.7 million in 2007. The increase in earnings is primarily due to
colder weather and more favorable pricing. Vectren Source’s customer
count at March 31, 2008 was approximately 157,000 as compared to 147,000 at
March 31, 2007.
Coal
Mining Operations
Coal
Mining Operations mine and sell coal to the Company’s utility operations and to
third parties through its wholly owned subsidiary Vectren Fuels, Inc.
(Fuels).
Coal
Mining operations, inclusive of holding company costs, incurred a loss of
approximately $0.9 million in 2008 compared to earnings of $1.6 million in
2007. The decline in earnings is primarily due to lost
production and increased costs somewhat offset by increased
prices Revised Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)
guidelines regarding roof structure necessitated redeploying one continuous
miner and nearly doubled the expense in securing the roof
structure. As a result, yield at the Prosperity mine was down 8
percent and costs per ton increased over 20 percent. Further, the
increased cost of diesel fuel has negatively impacted Coal Mining operations
results. However, while increased costs may continue, the Company expects that
earnings from mining operations will improve over first quarter results due
primarily to expected improvement in
production levels.
In April
2006, Fuels announced plans to open two new underground mines near Vincennes,
Indiana. Construction continues at the new underground mines, and the
box-cut was started in February. Production is expected to begin in
early 2009, with the second mine opening the following year. Reserves
at the two mines are estimated at 80 million tons of recoverable number-five
coal at 11,200 BTU (British thermal units) and 6-pound sulfur
dioxide. Management estimates a $125 million investment to access the
reserves. Once in production, the two new mines are expected to
produce 5 million tons of coal per year. Through March 31, 2008, the
Company has made investments totaling $25.7 million in the new
mines.
Energy
Infrastructure Services
Energy
Infrastructure Services provides underground construction and repair to utility
infrastructure through Miller Pipeline Corporation (Miller) and energy
performance contracting and renewable energy services through Energy Systems
Group, LLC (ESG). Inclusive of holding company costs, Energy
Infrastructure’s operations incurred a seasonal loss of $3.2 million in 2008
compared to a loss of $2.0 million in 2007.
Miller’s
year to date seasonal loss was $1.7 million in both 2008 and
2007. ESG’s loss in 2008 was $1.1 million compared to a loss of $0.3
million in 2007. The higher loss was primarily due to lower beginning
backlog and the timing of projects that have been awarded but not yet
released. At March 31, 2008, ESG’s backlog was $43 million compared
to $52 million at December 31, 2007.
Impact of Recently Issued
Accounting Guidance
SFAS
157
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(SFAS 157), except as it applies to those nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities. FSP FAS 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least
annually). This FSP deferred the effective date of Statement 157 for
those items to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair
value measurements; however, the standard impacts how other fair value based
GAAP is applied. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. Disclosures impacted by SFAS 157 are included in Note 15
to the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of the
remaining components of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2009 is also not expected to be
material on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
SFAS
159
Also on
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The Company did not choose to apply the option provided in
SFAS 159 to any of its eligible items; therefore, its adoption did not have any
impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of
operations.
SFAS
141 (Revised 2007)
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" (SFAS
141R). SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer of an entity (1) recognizes and measures the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree (2) recognizes and measures acquired goodwill or a bargain purchase
gain and (3) determines what information to disclose in its financial statements
in order to enable users to assess the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141R applies to all transactions or other
events in which one entity acquires control of one or more businesses and
applies to all business entities. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to
business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will
adopt SFAS 141R on January 1, 2009, and because the provisions of this standard
are applied prospectively, the impact to the Company cannot be determined until
the transactions occur.
SFAS
160
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB No. 51"(SFAS
160). SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that
require that the ownership percentages in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented separately from
the parent’s equity in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet; the
amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the
noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of
the consolidated income statement; that changes in the parent’s ownership
interest while it retains control over its subsidiary be accounted for
consistently; that when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained
noncontrolling equity investment be initially measured at fair value; and that
sufficient disclosure is made to clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160
applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except
for non-profit entities. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 31, 2008. Early adoption is not
permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, and is
currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its financial
statements and results of operations.
SFAS
161
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities – an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS
161). SFAS 161 enhances the current disclosures under SFAS 133 and
requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms
of underlying risk and accounting designation in order to better convey the
purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to
manage. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about
(a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and
its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. Tabular disclosure of fair value amounts and gains and
losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items is
required. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
adoption encouraged. The Company will adopt SFAS 161 on January 1,
2009 and is currently assessing the impact this statement will have on its
financial statements and results of operations.
Financial
Condition
Within
Vectren’s consolidated group, Utility Holdings funds the short-term and
long-term financing needs of the Utility Group operations, and Vectren Capital
Corp (Vectren Capital) funds short-term and long-term financing needs of the
Nonutility Group and corporate operations. Vectren Corporation
guarantees Vectren Capital’s debt, but does not guarantee Utility Holdings’
debt. Vectren Capital’s long-term and short-term obligations
outstanding at March 31, 2008, totaled $183 million and $169 million,
respectively. Utility Holdings’ outstanding long-term and short-term
borrowing arrangements are jointly and severally guaranteed by Indiana Gas,
SIGECO, and VEDO. Utility Holdings’ long-term and short-term
obligations outstanding at March 31, 2008, totaled $825 million and $136
million, respectively. Additionally, prior to Utility Holdings’
formation, Indiana Gas and SIGECO funded their operations separately, and
therefore, have long-term debt outstanding funded solely by their
operations.
The
Company’s common stock dividends are primarily funded by utility
operations. Nonutility operations have demonstrated profitability and
the ability to generate cash flows. These cash flows are primarily
reinvested in other nonutility ventures, but are also used to fund a portion of
the Company’s dividends, and from time to time may be reinvested in utility
operations or used for corporate expenses.
The
credit ratings of the senior unsecured debt of Utility Holdings and Indiana Gas,
at March 31, 2008, are A-/Baa1 as rated by Standard and Poor's Ratings Services
(Standard and Poor’s) and Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s),
respectively. The credit ratings on SIGECO's secured debt are
A/A3. Utility Holdings’ commercial paper has a credit rating of
A-2/P-2. The current outlook of both Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s
is stable. These ratings and outlooks have not changed since December
31, 2007. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or
hold securities. The rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at
any time, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other
rating. Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s lowest level investment grade
rating is BBB- and Baa3, respectively.
The
Company’s consolidated equity capitalization objective is 45-55 percent of
long-term capitalization. This objective may have varied, and will
vary, depending on particular business opportunities, capital spending
requirements, execution of long-term financing plans and seasonal factors that
affect the Company’s operations. The Company’s equity component was
49 percent and 50 percent of long-term capitalization at March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Long-term capitalization includes
long-term debt, including current maturities and debt subject to tender, as well
as common shareholders’ equity.
The
Company expects the majority of its capital expenditures, investments, and debt
security redemptions to be provided by internally generated
funds. However, due to increased levels of forecasted capital
expenditures and expected growth in nonutility operations, the Company may
require additional permanent financing. The Company expects to settle
an equity forward contract within the next twelve months and recently issued new
long-term debt as more fully described below. As of March 31, 2008,
the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants.
Sources
& Uses of Liquidity
Operating Cash
Flow
The
Company's primary source of liquidity to fund working capital requirements has
been cash generated from operations, which totaled $288.4 million in 2008,
compared to $215.2 million in 2007, an increase of $73.2 million
The
increase was primarily a result of changes in working capital
accounts. Net income before non-cash charges of $119.3 million
increased $16.2 million, compared to $103.1 million in 2007. Working
capital changes generated cash of $168.2 million in 2008 compared to cash
generated of $110.4 million in 2007.
Financing Cash
Flow
Although
working capital requirements are generally funded by cash flow from operations,
the Company uses short-term borrowings to supplement working capital needs when
accounts receivable balances are at their highest and gas storage is
refilled. Additionally, short-term borrowings are required for
capital projects and investments until they are financed on a long-term
basis.
Cash flow
required for financing activities reflects the impact of recently executed
long-term financing, increases in common stock dividends over the periods
presented, and changes in short term borrowings. Financing activities
are generally flat with net activity approximating $200 million in cash
requirements in both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007. In 2008, Utility Holdings issued $125 million of senior
unsecured securities and used those proceeds to refinance certain capital
projects originally financed with short-term borrowings. Also, during
the first quarter of 2008, the Company mitigated its exposure to auction rate
debt markets. These transactions are more fully described
below.
VUHI
Debt Issuance
In March
2008, Utility Holdings issued $125 million in 6.25 percent senior unsecured
notes due April 1, 2039 (2039 Notes) at par. The 2039 Notes are
guaranteed by Utility Holdings’ three public utilities: SIGECO,
Indiana Gas, and VEDO. These guarantees are full and unconditional
and joint and several.
The 2039
Notes have no sinking fund requirements, and interest payments are due
monthly. The notes may be called by Utility Holdings, in whole or in
part, at any time on or after April 1, 2013, at 100 percent of principal amount
plus accrued interest. During 2007, Utility Holdings entered into
several interest rate hedges with an $80 million notional
amount. Upon issuance of the notes, these instruments were settled
resulting in the payment of approximately $9.6 million, which was recorded as a
Regulatory asset
pursuant to existing regulatory orders. The value paid is being
amortized as an increase to interest expense over the life of the
issue. The proceeds from the sale of the 2039 Notes, settlement of
the hedging arrangements, and payments of issuance costs totaled approximately
$111.1 million.
Auction
Rate Mode Securities
In
February 2008, SIGECO provided notice to the current holders of approximately
$103 million of tax-exempt auction rate mode long-term debt of its plans to
convert that debt from its current auction rate mode into a daily interest rate
mode. In March 2008, the debt was tendered at 100 percent of the principal
amount plus accrued interest and is shown as a retirement of debt in the
consolidated statement of cash flows. During March 2008, SIGECO
remarketed approximately $61.8 million of these investments at interest rates
that are fixed to maturity, receiving proceeds, net of issuance costs, of
approximately $60.3 million. The terms are $22.6 million at 5.15
percent due in 2023, $22.2 million at 5.35 percent due in 2030 and $17.0 million
at 5.45 percent due in 2041. The remaining $41.2 million continues to
be held in treasury and is expected to be remarketed at some future
date.
Investing Cash
Flow
Cash flow
required for investing activities was $75.5 million in 2008 and $20.8 million in
2007. Capital expenditures are the primary component of investing
activities and totaled $69.6 million in 2008, compared to $67.2 million in
2007. The quarter ended March 31, 2008 includes higher levels of
expenditures for coal mine development. Investing cash flow in 2007
includes the receipt of $44.9 million in proceeds from the sale of
SIGECOM.
Available
Sources of Liquidity
Short-term Borrowing
Arrangements
At March
31, 2008, the Company has $780 million of short-term borrowing capacity,
including $520 million for the Utility Group and $260 million for the wholly
owned Nonutility Group and corporate operations, of which approximately $384
million is available for the Utility Group operations and approximately $91
million is available for the wholly owned Nonutility Group and corporate
operations.
Common Stock Offering in
2007
In
February 2007, the Company sold 4.6 million authorized but previously unissued
shares of its common stock to a group of underwriters in an SEC-registered
primary offering at a price of $28.33 per share. The transaction
generated proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, of
approximately $125.7 million. The Company executed an equity forward
sale agreement (equity forward) in connection with the offering, and therefore,
did not receive proceeds at the time of the equity offering.
The
Company will receive an amount equal to the net proceeds from that sale, subject
to certain adjustments defined in the equity forward, upon full share settlement
of the equity forward. Those adjustments defined in the equity
forward include 1) daily increases in the forward sale price based on a floating
interest factor equal to the federal funds rate, less a 35 basis point
fixed spread, and 2) structured quarterly decreases to the forward sale price
that align with expected Company dividend payments.
Except in
specified circumstances or events that would require share settlement, the
Company may elect to settle the equity forward in shares or in
cash. If the Company elects to settle in shares, the maximum number
of shares deliverable by the Company is 4.6 million shares. Proceeds
received or paid when the equity forward is settled will be recorded in Common Shareholders' Equity,
even if settled in cash. The equity forward must be settled prior to
February 28, 2009.
If the
equity forward had been settled by delivery of shares at March 31, 2008, the
Company would have received approximately $126 million for the 4.6 million
shares. If the Company had elected to settle the equity forward in
cash at March 31, 2008, the Company estimates it would have received
approximately $0.6 million, assuming the trailing three month average of
Vectren’s stock price approximates the equity forward’s unwind
price. The federal funds rate was 3.0 percent at March 31,
2008. The Company currently anticipates settling the equity forward
by delivering shares.
New Share
Issues
The
Company may periodically issue new common shares to satisfy the dividend
reinvestment plan, stock option plan and other employee benefit plan
requirements. New issuances added additional liquidity of $5.8
million in 2007.
Potential
Uses of Liquidity
Planned Capital Expenditures
& Investments
Investments
in total company capital expenditures and nonutility unconsolidated affiliates
for the remainder of 2008 are estimated to approximate $350
million.
Other Guarantees and Letters
of Credit
In the
normal course of business, Vectren issues guarantees to third parties on behalf
of its unconsolidated affiliates. Such guarantees allow those
affiliates to execute transactions on more favorable terms than the affiliate
could obtain without such a guarantee. Guarantees may include posted
letters of credit, leasing guarantees, and performance guarantees. As
of March 31, 2008, guarantees issued and outstanding on behalf of unconsolidated
affiliates approximated $3 million.
The
Company has accrued no liabilities for these guarantees as they relate to
guarantees executed prior to the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 45,
“Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.”
In 2006,
the Company issued a guarantee with an approximate $5.0 million maximum risk
related to the residual value of an operating lease that expires in
2011. As of March 31, 2008, Vectren Corporation has a liability
representing the fair value of that guarantee of approximately $0.1
million. Liabilities accrued for, and activity related to, product
warranties are not significant. Through December 31, 2007, the
Company has not been called upon to satisfy any obligations pursuant to its
guarantees.
Forward-Looking
Information
A
“safe harbor” for forward-looking statements is provided by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act of 1995). The
Reform Act of 1995 was adopted to encourage such forward-looking statements
without the threat of litigation, provided those statements are identified as
forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements
identifying important factors that could cause the actual results to differ
materially from those projected in the statement. Certain matters
described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and
Financial Condition are forward-looking statements. Such statements
are based on management’s beliefs, as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to management. When used in this
filing, the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “endeavor”, “estimate”, “expect”,
“objective”, “projection”, “forecast”, “goal” and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition to any
assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such
forward-looking statements, factors that could cause the Company’s actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking
statements include, among others, the following:
·
|
Factors
affecting utility operations such as unusual weather conditions;
catastrophic weather-related damage; unusual maintenance or repairs;
unanticipated changes to fossil fuel costs; unanticipated changes to gas
transportation and storage costs, or availability due to higher demand,
shortages, transportation problems or other developments; environmental or
pipeline incidents; transmission or distribution incidents; unanticipated
changes to electric energy supply costs, or availability due to demand,
shortages, transmission problems or other developments; or electric
transmission or gas pipeline system
constraints.
|
·
|
Increased
competition in the energy industry, including the effects of industry
restructuring and unbundling.
|
·
|
Regulatory
factors such as unanticipated changes in rate-setting policies or
procedures, recovery of investments and costs made under traditional
regulation, and the frequency and timing of rate
increases.
|
·
|
Financial,
regulatory or accounting principles or policies imposed by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board; the Securities and Exchange Commission; the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; state public utility commissions;
state entities which regulate electric and natural gas transmission and
distribution, natural gas gathering and processing, electric power supply;
and similar entities with regulatory
oversight.
|
·
|
Economic
conditions including the effects of an economic downturn, inflation rates,
commodity prices, and monetary
fluctuations.
|
·
|
Increased
natural gas commodity prices and the potential impact on customer
consumption, uncollectible accounts expense, unaccounted for gas and
interest expense.
|
·
|
Changing
market conditions and a variety of other factors associated with physical
energy and financial trading activities including, but not limited to,
price, basis, credit, liquidity, volatility, capacity, interest rate, and
warranty risks.
|
·
|
The
performance of projects undertaken by the Company’s nonutility businesses
and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities,
including but not limited to, the realization of synfuel income tax
credits and the Company’s coal mining, gas marketing, and energy
infrastructure strategies.
|
·
|
Direct
or indirect effects on the Company’s business, financial condition,
liquidity and results of operations resulting from changes in credit
ratings, changes in interest rates, and/or changes in market perceptions
of the utility industry and other energy-related
industries.
|
·
|
Employee
or contractor workforce factors including changes in key executives,
collective bargaining agreements with union employees, aging workforce
issues, or work stoppages.
|
·
|
Legal
and regulatory delays and other obstacles associated with mergers,
acquisitions and investments in joint
ventures.
|
·
|
Costs,
fines, penalties and other effects of legal and administrative
proceedings, settlements, investigations, claims, including, but not
limited to, such matters involving compliance with state and federal laws
and interpretations of these laws.
|
·
|
Changes
in federal, state or local legislative requirements, such as changes in
tax laws or rates, environmental laws, including laws governing greenhouse
gases, mandates of sources of renewable energy, and other
regulations.
|
The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in actual results,
changes in assumptions, or other factors affecting such statements.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
The
Company is exposed to various business risks associated with commodity prices,
interest rates, and counter-party credit. These financial exposures
are monitored and managed by the Company as an integral part of its overall risk
management program. The Company’s risk management program includes,
among other things, the use of derivatives. The Company may also
execute derivative contracts in the normal course of operations while buying and
selling commodities to be used in operations and optimizing its generation
assets.
The
Company has in place a risk management committee that consists of senior
management as well as financial and operational management. The
committee is actively involved in identifying risks as well as reviewing and
authorizing risk mitigation strategies.
These
risks are not significantly different from the information set forth in Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in the
Vectren 2007 Form 10-K and is therefore not presented herein.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Changes in Internal Controls
over Financial Reporting
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, there have been no changes to the Company’s
internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Conclusion Regarding the
Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
March 31, 2008, the Company conducted an evaluation under the supervision and
with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the effectiveness and the design and operation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31,
2007, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is:
1)
|
recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SEC’s rules and forms,
and
|
|
2)
|
accumulated
and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The
Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of
business. In the opinion of management, there are no legal
proceedings pending against the Company that are likely to have a material
adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows. See the notes to the consolidated financial statements
regarding commitments and contingencies, environmental matters, rate and
regulatory matters. The consolidated condensed financial statements
are included in Part 1 Item 1.
The
Company’s risk factors have not materially changed from the information set
forth in Item 1A Risk Factors included in the Vectren 2007 Form 10-K and are
therefore not presented herein.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
Periodically,
the Company purchases shares from the open market to satisfy share requirements
associated with the Company’s share-based compensation plans. The
following chart contains information regarding open market purchases made by the
Company to satisfy share-based compensation requirements during the quarter
ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Number of
|
|
Maximum
Number
|
|
|
Number
of
|
|
|
|
Shares
Purchased as
|
|
of
Shares That May
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Average
Price
|
|
Part
of Publicly
|
|
Be
Purchased Under
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Paid
Per Share
|
|
Announced
Plans
|
|
These
Plans
|
January
1-31
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
February 1-28
|
|
4,320
|
|
$ 27.10
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
March
1-31
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Exhibits
and Certifications
4.1
|
Sixth
Supplemental Indenture, dated March 10, 2008, among Vectren Utility
Holdings, Inc., Indiana Gas
Company,
Inc., Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Company, Vectren Energy Delivery
of Ohio, Inc., and U.S.
Bank
Trust National Association (Filed and designated in Form 8-K, dated March
12, 2008, File No.
1-15467,
as Exhibit 4.1)
|
31.1 Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002- Chief Executive
Officer
31.2 Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002- Chief Financial
Officer
32
|
Certification
Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of
2002
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
VECTREN
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May
2, 2008
|
|
/s/Jerome A. Benkert,
Jr.
|
|
|
|
Jerome
A. Benkert, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/M. Susan
Hardwick
|
|
|
|
M.
Susan Hardwick
|
|
|
|
Vice
President, Controller and Assistant Treasurer
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|