e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR
THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission File No. 001-33861
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
11-2153962 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2929 California Street, Torrance, California
|
|
90503 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
Zip Code |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (310) 212-7910
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o |
|
Accelerated filer
þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
There were 12,070,555 shares of Common Stock outstanding at August 4, 2008.
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC.
GLOSSARY
The following terms are frequently used in the text of this report and have the meanings indicated
below.
Used Core An alternator or starter which has been used in the operation of a vehicle. The Used
Core is an original equipment (OE) alternator or starter installed by the vehicle manufacturer
and subsequently removed for replacement. Used Cores contain salvageable parts which are an
important raw material in the remanufacturing process. We obtain most Used Cores by providing
credits to our customers for Used Cores returned to us under our core exchange program. Our
customers receive these Used Cores from consumers who deliver a Used Core to obtain credit from our
customers upon the purchase of a newly remanufactured alternator or starter. If sufficient Used
Cores cannot be obtained from our customers, we will purchase Used Cores from core brokers, who are
in the business of buying and selling Used Cores. The Used Cores purchased from core brokers or
returned to us by our customers under the core exchange program, and which have been physically
received by us, are part of our raw material or work in process inventory included in long-term
core inventory.
Remanufactured Core The Used Core underlying an alternator or starter that has gone through the
remanufacturing process and through that process has become part of a newly remanufactured
alternator or starter. The remanufacturing process takes a Used Core, breaks it down into its
component parts, replaces those components that cannot be reused and reassembles the salvageable
components of the Used Core and additional new components into a remanufactured alternator or
starter. Remanufactured Cores are included in our on-hand finished goods inventory and in the
remanufactured finished good product held for sale at customer locations. Used Cores returned by
consumers to our customers but not yet returned to us continue to be classified as Remanufactured
Cores until we physically receive these Used Cores. All Remanufactured Cores are included in our
long-term core inventory or in our long-term core inventory deposit.
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
354,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,935,000 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
9,396,000 |
|
|
|
2,789,000 |
|
Inventory net |
|
|
34,455,000 |
|
|
|
32,707,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,738,000 |
|
|
|
5,657,000 |
|
Inventory unreturned |
|
|
4,270,000 |
|
|
|
4,124,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,842,000 |
|
|
|
1,608,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
56,450,000 |
|
|
|
49,193,000 |
|
Plant and equipment net |
|
|
16,257,000 |
|
|
|
15,996,000 |
|
Long-term core inventory |
|
|
54,585,000 |
|
|
|
50,808,000 |
|
Long-term core inventory deposit |
|
|
22,687,000 |
|
|
|
22,477,000 |
|
Long-term accounts receivable |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
767,000 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,345,000 |
|
|
|
1,357,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
329,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
1,673,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
372,000 |
|
|
|
810,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
153,758,000 |
|
|
$ |
141,408,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
28,934,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,401,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
787,000 |
|
|
|
2,200,000 |
|
Accrued salaries and wages |
|
|
3,745,000 |
|
|
|
3,396,000 |
|
Accrued workers compensation claims |
|
|
2,339,000 |
|
|
|
2,042,000 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
2,211,000 |
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
10,745,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
133,000 |
|
|
|
133,000 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
448,000 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
1,723,000 |
|
|
|
1,711,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
51,118,000 |
|
|
|
43,096,000 |
|
Deferred income, less current portion |
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
Deferred core revenue |
|
|
3,706,000 |
|
|
|
2,927,000 |
|
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback |
|
|
1,210,000 |
|
|
|
1,340,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
543,000 |
|
|
|
265,000 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
2,423,000 |
|
|
|
2,565,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
59,089,000 |
|
|
|
50,315,000 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A junior participating preferred stock; par value $.01 per share,
20,000 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; par value $.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
12,070,555 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
121,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
92,892,000 |
|
|
|
92,663,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital-warrant |
|
|
1,879,000 |
|
|
|
1,879,000 |
|
Shareholder note receivable |
|
|
(682,000 |
) |
|
|
(682,000 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(216,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,248,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
94,669,000 |
|
|
|
91,093,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
153,758,000 |
|
|
$ |
141,408,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
4
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
32,705,000 |
|
|
$ |
35,441,000 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
21,225,000 |
|
|
|
25,241,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
11,480,000 |
|
|
|
10,200,000 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,202,000 |
|
|
|
4,788,000 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,012,000 |
|
|
|
929,000 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
462,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
5,676,000 |
|
|
|
5,992,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,804,000 |
|
|
|
4,208,000 |
|
Other
expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
832,000 |
|
|
|
1,657,000 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
4,986,000 |
|
|
|
2,565,000 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,954,000 |
|
|
|
973,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,032,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
12,070,555 |
|
|
|
9,904,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
12,193,667 |
|
|
|
10,186,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
5
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,032,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
762,000 |
|
|
|
608,000 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred gain on sale-leaseback |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
Provision for inventory reserves |
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
514,000 |
|
Provision for customer payment discrepencies |
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
178,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(138,000 |
) |
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
229,000 |
|
|
|
278,000 |
|
Impact of tax benefit on APIC pool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,000 |
) |
Changes in current assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,979,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,564,000 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(558,000 |
) |
|
|
4,721,000 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378,000 |
|
Inventory unreturned |
|
|
(146,000 |
) |
|
|
950,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(221,000 |
) |
|
|
435,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
441,000 |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(4,529,000 |
) |
|
|
(17,183,000 |
) |
Income tax payable |
|
|
1,846,000 |
|
|
|
(182,000 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
(33,000 |
) |
|
|
(33,000 |
) |
Deferred core revenue |
|
|
779,000 |
|
|
|
283,000 |
|
Long-term accounts receivable |
|
|
707,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term core inventory |
|
|
(2,283,000 |
) |
|
|
(523,000 |
) |
Long-term core inventory deposits |
|
|
(210,000 |
) |
|
|
(183,000 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(320,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(7,342,000 |
) |
|
|
(11,773,000 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(532,000 |
) |
|
|
(595,000 |
) |
Purchase of business assets, net |
|
|
(4,164,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in short term investments |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,708,000 |
) |
|
|
(622,000 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
14,445,000 |
|
|
|
14,400,000 |
|
Repayments under line of credit |
|
|
(3,700,000 |
) |
|
|
(37,200,000 |
) |
Net payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(445,000 |
) |
|
|
(382,000 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
Excess tax benefit from employee stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,000 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,061,000 |
|
Stock issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,947,000 |
) |
Impact of tax benefit on APIC pool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
10,300,000 |
|
|
|
14,065,000 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
169,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,581,000 |
) |
|
|
1,700,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of period |
|
|
1,935,000 |
|
|
|
349,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents End of period |
|
$ |
354,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,049,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
762,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,730,000 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
(386,000 |
) |
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquired under capital lease |
|
$ |
315,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Holdback on purchase of business assets |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.
6
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009. This report should be read in conjunction with
the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2008, which are included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 16, 2008.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a consistent basis with,
and there have been no material changes to, the accounting policies described in Note B to the
consolidated financial statements that are presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, except as discussed in Note 14 below.
Certain items in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 have been
reclassified to conform to fiscal 2009 classifications.
1. Company Background and Organization
Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or MPA) remanufacture and
distribute alternators and starters for imported and domestic cars and light trucks. These
replacement parts are sold for use on vehicles after initial vehicle purchase. These automotive
parts are sold to automotive retail chain stores and warehouse distributors throughout the United
States and Canada and to a major U.S. automobile manufacturer.
The Company obtains used alternators and starters, commonly known as Used Cores, primarily from its
customers (retailers) as trade-ins. It also purchases Used Cores from vendors (core brokers). The
retailers grant credit to the consumer when the used part is returned to them, and the Company in
turn provides a credit to the retailer upon return to the Company. These Used Cores are an
essential material needed for the remanufacturing operations. The Company has remanufacturing,
warehousing and shipping/receiving operations for alternators and starters in Mexico, California,
Singapore and Malaysia. In addition, the Company utilizes third party warehouse distribution
centers in Fairfield, New Jersey and Springfield, Oregon.
In September 2007, the Company exercised its right to cancel the lease of its Torrance, California
facility with respect to approximately 80,000 square feet currently utilized for core receipt,
storage and packing. This cancellation was effective May 31, 2008. The Company transitioned these
functions to its facilities in Mexico.
The Company operates in one business segment pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of Enterprise and Related Information.
2. Acquisition
On May 16, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Automotive Importing
Manufacturing, Inc. (AIM), specifically its operation which produced new and remanufactured
alternators and starters for imported and domestic passenger vehicles. These products are sold
under Talon, Xtreme and other brand names. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to a signed
definitive purchase agreement, dated April 24, 2008.
The Company believes the acquisition of AIM expands its customer base and product line, including
the addition of business in heavy duty alternator and starter applications. Pro forma information
is not presented as the assets and results of operations of AIM and the purchase price were not
significant to the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
7
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table reflects the preliminary allocation of the purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration and acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
$ |
3,727,000 |
|
Purchase price hold back |
|
|
500,000 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,664,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Allocation: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
|
$ |
(221,000 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
2,853,000 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
212,000 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,441,000 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
50,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
329,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
4,664,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The definitive purchase agreement was amended on May 16, 2008. The amendment provided for an
additional contingent consideration of up to $400,000 to AIM if the net sales to certain customers
exceed an agreed upon dollar threshold during the period June 1, 2008 to May 31, 2009. Any
subsequent payment under this arrangement would increase the total purchase price and would be
allocated to goodwill.
The results of operations of the certain assets acquired from AIM are included in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations from the date of acquisition.
3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for goodwill under the guidance set forth in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), which specifies that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles
should not be amortized. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or more
frequently if events or circumstances occur that would indicate a reduction in fair value of the
Company. The Companys intangible assets other than goodwill are finite-lived and amortized on a
straight-line basis over their respective useful lives and are analyzed for impairment under the
guidance set forth in SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets
(SFAS No. 144) when and if indicators of impairment exist. The following is a summary of the
Companys intangible assets as of June 30, 2008 which resulted from the acquisition of AIM during
the period. The Company had no goodwill or intangible assets at March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
7 years |
|
$ |
212,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
7 years |
|
|
1,441,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
5 years |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,703,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
329,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
8
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $30,000 during the three months ended June
30, 2008. The aggregate estimated amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 remaining nine months |
|
|
$ |
185,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
504,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
1,673,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accounts Receivable Net
Included in Accounts receivable net are significant offset accounts related to customer
allowances earned, customer payment discrepancies, in-transit and estimated future unit returns,
estimated future credits to be provided for Used Cores returned by the customers and potential bad
debts. Due to the forward looking nature and the different aging periods of certain estimated
offset accounts, they may not, at any point in time, directly relate to the balances in the open
trade accounts receivable.
Accounts receivable net is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Accounts receivable trade |
|
$ |
34,778,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,740,000 |
|
Allowance for bad debts |
|
|
(24,000 |
) |
|
|
(18,000 |
) |
Customer allowances earned |
|
|
(2,945,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,178,000 |
) |
Customer payment discrepancies |
|
|
(497,000 |
) |
|
|
(492,000 |
) |
Customer finished goods returns accruals |
|
|
(8,813,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,977,000 |
) |
Customer core returns accruals |
|
|
(13,103,000 |
) |
|
|
(12,286,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: total accounts receivable offset accounts |
|
|
(25,382,000 |
) |
|
|
(22,951,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable net |
|
$ |
9,396,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,789,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty Returns
The Company allows its customers to return goods to the Company that their end-user customers have
returned to them, whether the returned item is or is not defective (warranty returns). The Company
accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty returns based on a historical analysis of the level
of this type of return as a percentage of total units sales. The warranty return accrual is
included under the customer finished goods returns accruals in the above table.
Change in the Companys warranty return accrual is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(2,824,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,455,000 |
) |
Charged to expenses |
|
|
7,963,000 |
|
|
|
5,837,000 |
|
Amounts processed |
|
|
(7,478,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,043,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
(3,309,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,249,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
5. Inventory
Non-core inventory, Inventory unreturned, Long-term core inventory, Long-term core inventory
deposit is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-core inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
10,878,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,406,000 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
97,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
25,710,000 |
|
|
|
23,206,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,685,000 |
|
|
|
34,767,000 |
|
Less allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
(2,230,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,060,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
34,455,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,707,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory unreturned |
|
$ |
4,270,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term core inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used cores held at companys facilities |
|
$ |
10,886,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,630,000 |
|
Used cores expected to be returned by customers |
|
|
3,507,000 |
|
|
|
2,255,000 |
|
Remanufactured goods held in finished goods |
|
|
17,662,000 |
|
|
|
15,407,000 |
|
Remanufactured cores held at customers locations |
|
|
23,230,000 |
|
|
|
21,218,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,285,000 |
|
|
|
51,510,000 |
|
Less allowance for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
(700,000 |
) |
|
|
(702,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
54,585,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,808,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term core inventory deposit |
|
$ |
22,687,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,477,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Major Customers
The Companys five largest customers accounted for the following total percentage of net sales and
accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Sales |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Customer A |
|
|
|
46% |
|
|
|
57% |
|
Customer B |
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
6% |
|
Customer C |
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
8% |
|
Customer D |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
|
13% |
|
Customer E |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Customer A |
|
|
|
16% |
|
|
|
19% |
|
Customer B |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
24% |
|
Customer C |
|
|
|
31% |
|
|
|
31% |
|
Customer D |
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
5% |
|
Customer E |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
11% |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, one supplier provided approximately 23% of the raw
materials purchased. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, two suppliers provided
approximately 18% and 17% of the
10
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
raw materials purchased, respectively. No other supplier accounted
for more than 10% of the Companys raw materials purchases for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 or
2007.
7. Line of Credit; Factoring Agreements
On October 24, 2007, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with its bank. Under the Credit Agreement, the bank continues to provide the Company
with a revolving loan (the Revolving Loan) of up to $35,000,000, including obligations under
outstanding letters of credit, which may not exceed $7,000,000. In January 2008, the Company
entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement with its bank. This amendment extended the
expiration date of the credit facility to October 1, 2009.
In May 2008, the Companys Credit Agreement was further amended to allow the Company, among other
things, to borrow up to $15,000,000 under the Revolving Loan for the purpose of consummating
certain permitted acquisitions. The aggregate consideration paid for any single permitted
acquisition may not exceed $7,500,000, and the aggregate consideration paid for all permitted
acquisitions made during the term of the Credit Agreement may not exceed $20,000,000. Pursuant to
the terms of this amendment, the Company may continue to use the entire available amount under the
Revolving Loan for working capital and general corporate purposes.
The bank holds a security interest in substantially all of the Companys assets. At June 30, 2008,
the balance of the Revolving Loan was $10,745,000. There was no outstanding balance on the
Revolving Loan at March 31, 2008. Additionally, the Company had reserved $3,001,000 of the
Revolving Loan for standby letters of credit for workers compensation insurance as of June 30,
2008. As of June 30, 2008, $21,254,000 was available under the Revolving Loan.
The Credit Agreement, among other things, continues to require the Company to maintain certain
financial covenants, including cash flow, fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio and a
number of restrictive covenants, including limits on capital expenditures and operating leases,
prohibitions against additional indebtedness, payment of dividends, pledge of assets and loans to
officers and/or affiliates. In addition, it is an event of default under the loan agreement if
Selwyn Joffe is no longer the Companys CEO.
The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of June
30, 2008.
Under two separate agreements executed on July 30, 2004 and August 21, 2003 with two customers and
their respective banks, the Company may sell those customers receivables to those banks at a
discount to be agreed upon at the time the receivables are sold. These discount arrangements have
allowed the Company to accelerate collection of customer receivables aggregating $16,406,000 and
$21,397,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, by an average of 310
days and 281 days, respectively. On an annualized basis, the weighted average discount rate on the
receivables sold to the banks during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was 4.5% and
6.5%, respectively. The amount of the discount on these receivables, $609,000 and $1,184,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was recorded as interest expense. In
May 2008, one of these customers elected to suspend the use of its receivable discount program, but
has advised the Company that it may be in a position to re-open the use of this program sometime in
the future.
8. Stock Options and Share-Based Payments
The Company adopted FAS No. 123(R), effective April 1, 2006, using the modified prospective
adoption method. The Company did not modify the terms of any previously granted options in
anticipation of the adoption of FAS No. 123(R). The Company recognized stock-based compensation
expense of $229,000 and $278,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company granted 50,000 stock options during the three months ended June 30, 2008. No stock
options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
At June 30, 2008, there was $399,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense from stock-based
compensation granted under the plans, which is related to non-vested shares. The compensation
expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.1 years.
11
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
9. Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share includes the
effect, if any, from the potential exercise or conversion of securities, such as stock options and
warrants, which would result in the issuance of incremental shares of common stock.
The following presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,032,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares |
|
|
12,070,555 |
|
|
|
9,904,076 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants |
|
|
123,112 |
|
|
|
282,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
12,193,667 |
|
|
|
10,186,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of dilutive options and warrants excludes 995,606 options and 546,283 warrants with
exercise prices ranging from $7.27 to $18.37 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
17,375 options and 546,283 warrants with exercise prices ranging from $13.65 to $19.13 per share
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 all of which were anti-dilutive.
On July 22, 2008, the Company acquired 108,534 shares of its common stock which had been pledged by
Mr. Marks (see Note 12).
10. Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS No. 130) established standards for the
reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose
financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period
resulting from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The
Companys total comprehensive income consists of net income, unrealized gain on short-term
investments and foreign currency translation adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,032,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,000 |
|
Unrealized gain on short-term investments |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
309,000 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income |
|
$ |
3,347,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,762,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
11. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 reflects income tax rates
higher than the federal statutory rates primarily due to state income taxes, which was partially
offset by the benefit of lower statutory tax rates in foreign taxing jurisdictions. At March 31,
2008, the Company no longer had any federal net operating loss carry forward. As a result, the
Companys cash flow will be impacted by its future tax payments.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and
various state and foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The 2004 through 2007
tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal and most state tax authorities. There
are currently no Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examinations taking place or scheduled. The
specific timing of when the resolution of each tax position will be reached is uncertain.
12. Litigation
In December 2003, the SEC and the United States Attorneys Office brought actions against Richard
Marks, the Companys former President and Chief Operating Officer. (Mr. Marks is also the son of
Mel Marks, the Companys founder, largest shareholder and member of its Board of Directors.) Mr.
Marks ultimately pled guilty to several criminal charges in June 2005.
In June 2006, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with Mr. Marks.
Under this agreement (which was unanimously approved by a Special Committee of the Board of
Directors consisting of Messrs. Borneo, Gay and Siegel), Mr. Marks agreed to pay the Company
$682,000 as partial reimbursement of the legal fees and costs the Company had advanced pursuant its
pre-existing indemnification agreements with Mr. Marks. This amount was due on January 15, 2008. In
June 2006, the Company recorded a shareholder note receivable for the $682,000 Mr. Marks owes the
Company. The note is classified in shareholders equity as it is collateralized by the Companys
common stock. Mr. Marks also agreed to pay interest at the prime rate plus one percent on June 15,
2007 (paid on June 22, 2007) and January 15, 2008 (paid on January 22, 2008). Mr. Marks pledged
80,000 shares of the Companys common stock that he owns to secure this obligation. If at any time
the market price of the stock pledged by Mr. Marks was less than 125% of Mr. Marks obligation, he
was required to pledge additional stock to maintain not less than the 125% coverage level. Under
the terms of an amendment to the agreement with Mr. Marks that was effective January 15, 2008, the
Company agreed to extend the due date of Mr. Marks obligation to pay $682,000 from January 15,
2008 to July 15, 2008. This amendment was unanimously approved by the Special Committee of the
Board of Directors that had approved the original Settlement Agreement. Mr. Marks agreed to pledge
an additional 31,500 shares of the Companys common stock that he owns to secure this obligation
and any additional shares necessary to maintain no less than a 140% coverage level. Mr. Marks also
agreed to pay interest at the prime rate plus three percent during the extension period. In March
2008 and May 2008, Mr. Marks pledged an additional 20,528 and 33,492 shares, respectively, to
maintain the necessary coverage level of 140%.
On July 22, 2008, the Company acquired 108,534 shares of its common stock which had been pledged by
Mr. Marks in satisfaction of the $682,000 shareholder note receivable plus interest accrued from
January 15, 2008 through July 22, 2008, and the remaining shares pledged as collateral were
released to Mr. Marks.
The Company is subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of business. Management
does not believe that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its
financial position or future results of operations.
13. Customs Duties
The Company received a request for information dated April 16, 2007 from the U.S. Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) concerning the Companys importation of products remanufactured at
the Companys Malaysian facilities. In response to the CBPs request, the Company began an internal
review, with the assistance of customs counsel, of its custom duties procedures. During this review
process, the Company identified a potential exposure related to the omission of certain cost
elements in the appraised value of used alternators and starters, which were remanufactured in
Malaysia and returned to the United States since June 2002.
13
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The Company provided a prior disclosure letter dated June 5, 2007 to the customs authorities in
order to obtain more time to complete its internal review process. This prior disclosure letter
also provides the Company the opportunity to self report any underpayment of customs duties in
prior years which could reduce financial penalties, if any, imposed by the CBP. Based on the
review conducted by the Company, it was determined that it was probable the CBP would make a claim
for additional duties, fees and interest on the value of remanufactured units shipped back to the
Company from Malaysia. Therefore, an accrual for $1,836,000 was recorded as of March 31, 2008,
representing the estimated maximum value of the probable claim.
On February 7, 2008, the Company responded to the CBP with the results of its internal review for
products shipped back to the Company during the period from June 5, 2002 to March 31, 2007. In
connection with this response, the Company paid approximately $278,000 to the CBP, which included
the payment of duties, fees, and interest on the value of certain components that were used in the
remanufacture of the products shipped back to the Company. On May 6, 2008, the Company paid an
additional $126,000 to the CBP covering duties, fees and interest on the value of certain
components that were used in the remanufacture of the products shipped back to the Company during
the period from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008. These payments reduced the accrued liability
recorded in connection with the claim.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company received notification from the CBP stating
that the prior disclosure had been reviewed and determined to be valid, therefore, no further
penalties are likely to be assessed and the review was closed regarding remanufactured units
shipped back to the Company from Malaysia. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the
accrual of $1,307,000 was reversed, reducing cost of goods sold.
14. New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also
established a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with the accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value
measurement. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
However, a FASB Staff Position issued in February 2008, delayed the effectiveness of SFAS No. 157
for one year, but only as applied to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The adoption
of SFAS No. 157 on April 1, 2008 did not have an impact on the Companys financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
The hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as
of the measurement date. The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is
based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement. The three levels are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is based upon unobservable inputs that are significant to the
fair value measurement.
|
14
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Companys short-term investments, deferred
compensation and financial instruments by the above SFAS No. 157 categories as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
395,000 |
|
|
$ |
395,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
349,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
349,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys short-term investments, which fund its deferred compensation liabilities, consist of
investments in mutual funds. These investments are classified as Level 1 as the shares of these
mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable the Company to obtain pricing
information on an ongoing basis.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are primarily measured based on the foreign
currency spot and forward rates quoted by the banks or foreign currency dealers.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure at fair
value certain financial instruments and other items that are not currently required to be measured
at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on April 1, 2008 and elected not to measure any additional financial
instruments or other items at fair value.
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)).
SFAS No. 141(R) applies to any transaction or other event that meets the definition of a business
combination. Where applicable, SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer recognizes and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, non-controlling
interest in the acquiree and goodwill or gain from a bargain purchase. In addition, SFAS No. 141(R)
determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. Also in December 2007, the FASB issued
Statement No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160).
This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 are required to be
adopted simultaneously and are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 with earlier adoption being prohibited. The Company does not currently have
any non-controlling interests in its subsidiaries. Both SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 are
adopted prospectively, therefore they do not have any current impact.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 changes
the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB
Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
guidance in SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161
encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 161.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Principles
(SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 outlines the order of authority for the sources of accounting
principles. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 162
to have any impact on its consolidated financial statements and required disclosures.
15
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis presents factors that we believe are relevant to an
assessment and understanding of our consolidated financial position and results of operations. This
financial and business analysis should be read in conjunction with our March 31, 2008 audited
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on June 16,
2008.
Disclosure Regarding Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to our future performance that
involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to differ materially
from those projected in such statements. These factors include, but are not limited to:
concentration of sales to certain customers, changes in our relationship with any of our customers,
including the increasing customer pressure for lower prices and more favorable payment and other
terms, our ability to renew the contract with our largest customer that is scheduled to expire in
August 2008 and the terms of any such renewal or to continue our relationship with this customer on
an otherwise equally satisfactory basis, the increasing demands on our working capital, including
the significant strain on working capital associated with large Remanufactured Core inventory
purchases from customers of the type we have increasingly made, our ability to obtain any
additional financing we may seek or require, our ability to achieve positive cash flows from
operations, potential future changes in our previously reported results as a result of the
identification and correction of errors in our accounting policies or procedures or the material
weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting, lower revenues than anticipated from
new and existing contracts, our failure to meet the financial covenants or the other obligations
set forth in our bank credit agreement and the banks refusal to waive any such defaults, any
meaningful difference between projected production needs and ultimate sales to our customers,
increases in interest rates, changes in the financial condition of any of our major customers, the
impact of high gasoline prices, the potential for changes in consumer spending, consumer
preferences and general economic conditions, increased competition in the automotive parts
industry, including increased competition from Chinese and other offshore manufacturers, difficulty
in obtaining Used Cores and component parts or increases in the costs of those parts, political or
economic instability in any of the foreign countries where we conduct operations, unforeseen
increases in operating costs and other factors discussed herein and in our other filings with the
SEC.
16
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Acquisition
On May 16, 2008, we completed the acquisition of certain assets of Automotive Importing
Manufacturing, Inc. (AIM), specifically its operation which produced new and remanufactured
alternators and starters for imported and domestic passenger vehicles. These products are sold
under Talon, Xtreme and other brand names. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to a signed
definitive purchase agreement, dated April 24, 2008.
We believe the acquisition of AIM expands our customer base and product line, including the
addition of business in heavy duty alternator and starter applications. Pro forma information is
not presented as the assets and results of operations of AIM and the purchase price were not
significant to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The following table reflects the preliminary allocation of the purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration and acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
$ |
3,727,000 |
|
Purchase price hold back |
|
|
500,000 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,664,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Allocation: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances |
|
$ |
(221,000 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
2,853,000 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
212,000 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,441,000 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
50,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
329,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
4,664,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The definitive purchase agreement was amended on May 16, 2008. The amendment provided for an
additional contingent consideration of up to $400,000 to AIM if the net sales to certain customers
exceed an agreed upon dollar threshold during the period June 1, 2008 to May 31, 2009. Any
subsequent payment under this arrangement would increase the total purchase price and would be
allocated to goodwill.
The results of operations of the certain assets acquired from AIM are included in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations from the date of acquisition.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
The following table summarizes certain key operating data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
Cash flow from operations |
|
$ |
(7,342,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,773,000 |
) |
Finished goods turnover (annualized) (1) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Annualized return on equity (2) |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized finished goods turnover for the fiscal quarter is calculated by multiplying cost
of sales for the quarter by 4 and dividing the result by the average between beginning and
ending non-core finished goods |
17
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
inventory values, for the fiscal quarter. We believe this
provides a useful measure of our ability to turn production into revenues. |
|
(2) |
|
Annualized return on equity is computed as net income for the fiscal quarter multiplied by 4
and dividing the result by beginning shareholders equity. Annualized return on equity
measures our ability to invest shareholders funds profitably. |
Following is our unaudited results of operations, reflected as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Interest expense net of interest income |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased by $2,736,000 or 7.7%, to
$32,705,000 compared to net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2007 of $35,441,000, reflecting the impact of customer purchasing and return patterns. The
rotating electrical aftermarket has been positively impacted by the increased age of automobiles on
the road and has been negatively impacted by increased gas prices and other economic factors, which
result in lower aggregate miles driven.
Cost of Goods Sold/Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales decreased during
the three months ended June 30, 2008 to 64.9% from 71.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2007,
resulting in a corresponding increase in our gross profit of 6.3%, to 35.1% for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 from 28.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in the gross
profit percentage, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, was primarily due to the
reversal of $1,307,000 related to the customs duties accrual and the lower per unit manufacturing
costs resulting from the transition of a majority of remanufacturing operations from the United
States to our Mexico and Malaysia facilities.
General and Administrative. Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June
30, 2008 were $4,202,000, which represents a decrease of $586,000, or 12.2%, from general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2007 of $4,788,000. This decrease was
primarily due to the following: (i) $276,000 of decreased severance and other related expenses,
(ii) $414,000 of decreased audit and other professional services fees, (iii) $90,000 of increased
gain recorded due to the changes in the net effect of the foreign exchange contracts, and (iv)
$154,000 decrease in bad debt expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2007 which primarily resulted from the forced closure of one of our smaller
customers in the prior year. These decreases in general and administrative expenses were partially
offset by an increase of $345,000 at our offshore facilities primarily due to the shift of
remanufacturing operations.
Sales and Marketing. Our sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008
increased $83,000 or 8.9%, to $1,012,000 from $929,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
This increase was due primarily to an increase in travel related expenses and consulting fees.
Research and Development. Our research and development expenses increased by $187,000, or 68.0%, to
$462,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $275,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2007. The increase was primarily related to our new heavy duty initiative and an increase in
compensation and travel related expenses.
18
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Interest Expense. Our interest expense, net of interest income, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 was $818,000. This represents a decrease of $825,000 over interest expense, net of interest
income, of $1,643,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease was primarily
attributable to a lower balance of receivables being factored during the three months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Interest expense, net of interest
income, also decreased as a result of a decrease in the average outstanding balance on our line of
credit for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007,
and the decrease in short-term interest rates.
Income Tax. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized income tax expense of
$1,954,000 compared to $973,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Income tax expense for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 reflects income tax rates higher than the federal
statutory rates primarily due to state income taxes, which was partially offset by the benefit of
lower statutory tax rates in foreign taxing jurisdictions. At March 31, 2008, we no longer had any
federal net operating loss carry forward. As a result, our cash flow will be impacted by our future
tax payments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
At June 30, 2008, we had working capital of $5,332,000, a ratio of current assets to current
liabilities of 1.1:1, and cash of $354,000, compared to working capital of $6,097,000, a ratio of
current assets to current liabilities of 1.1:1, and cash of $1,935,000 at March 31, 2008. The
change in working capital from March 31, 2008 is primarily the result of increased short-term
borrowings under our line of credit, which was partially used to pay down our accounts payable
balances, acquire certain assets of AIM and to offset the loss of cash resources due to our
inability to factor certain customer accounts receivable.
We have financed our operations through the use of our Credit Agreement and the receivable discount
programs we had with two of our customers. In May 2008, one of these customers elected to suspend
the use of its receivable discount program, but has advised us that it may be in a position to
re-open the use of this program sometime in the future. We cannot provide assurance that the
program will continue or that a similar program with another customer will be established.
We believe amounts available under our Credit Agreement and our cash and short term investments on
hand are sufficient to satisfy our expected future working capital needs, capital lease commitments
and capital expenditure obligations over the next year.
Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities was $7,342,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to $11,773,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The most significant changes in
operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2007 was an increase in net income attributable in part to a reduction in costs from the
shift of remanufacturing operations to our Mexican and Malaysian facilities; an increase in our
long-term core inventory due to increased levels of Remanufactured Cores held for sale at our
customers locations; the loss of cash resources due to our inability to factor certain customer
accounts receivable; and a less significant reduction in our accounts payable and accrued
liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 30,
2007, as the proceeds from our private placement were used to pay down our accounts payable
balances of $17,183,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Additionally, as of March 31, 2008, we had no remaining net operating loss carry forwards. As net
operating loss carry forwards for tax purposes are no longer available, we anticipate that our
future cash flow will be impacted by our future tax payments.
Net cash used in investing activities was $4,708,000 and $622,000 during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The change primarily resulted from the acquisition of
certain assets of AIM of $4,664,000, less the $500,000 holdback, and capital expenditures during
the period of $532,000. The capital expenditures primarily related to IT equipment and improvements
at our Torrance, California location.
19
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Net cash provided by financing activities was $10,300,000, and $14,065,000, during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we
borrowed amounts under our line of credit to finance the acquisition of certain assets of AIM, to
pay down our accounts payable balances, and to offset the loss of cash resources due to our
inability to factor certain customer accounts receivable. In May 2007, we completed a private
placement of our common stock and warrants, which was substantially used to pay down borrowings
under the line of credit and accounts payable balances.
Capital Resources
Line of Credit
On October 24, 2007, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with our bank. Under the Credit Agreement, the bank continues to provide us with a
revolving loan (the Revolving Loan) of up to $35,000,000, including obligations under outstanding
letters of credit, which may not exceed $7,000,000. In January 2008, we entered into an amendment
to the Credit Agreement with our bank. This amendment extended the expiration date of our credit
facility to October 1, 2009.
In May 2008, our Credit Agreement was further amended to allow us, among other things, to borrow up
to $15,000,000 under the Revolving Loan for the purpose of consummating certain permitted
acquisitions. The aggregate consideration paid for any single permitted acquisition may not exceed
$7,500,000, and the aggregate consideration paid for all permitted acquisitions made during the
term of the Credit Agreement may not exceed $20,000,000. Pursuant to the terms of this amendment,
we may continue to use the entire available amount under the Revolving Loan for working capital and
general corporate purposes.
The bank holds a security interest in substantially all of our assets. At June 30, 2008, the
balance of the Revolving Loan was $10,745,000. There was no outstanding balance on the Revolving
Loan at March 31, 2008. Additionally, we had reserved $3,001,000 of the Revolving Loan for standby
letters of credit for workers compensation insurance as of June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008,
$21,254,000 was available under the Revolving Loan.
The Credit Agreement (as amended), among other things, continues to require us to maintain certain
financial covenants, including cash flow, fixed charge coverage ratio and leverage ratio and
includes a number of restrictive covenants, including limits on capital expenditures and operating
leases, prohibitions against additional indebtedness, payment of dividends, pledge of assets and
loans to officers and/or affiliates. In addition, it is an event of default under the loan
agreement if Selwyn Joffe is no longer our CEO.
We were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2008.
Borrowings under the Revolving Loan bear interest at a base rate per annum plus an applicable
margin which fluctuates as noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio as of the End of the Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
Greater Than or |
|
|
|
|
Base Interest Rate Selected by us |
|
Equal to 1.50 to 1.00 |
|
|
Less Than 1.50 to 1.00 |
|
Banks Reference Rate, plus |
|
0.0% per year |
|
-0.25% per year |
Banks LIBOR Rate, plus |
|
2.0% per year |
|
1.75% per year |
Our ability to comply in future periods with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement, as
amended, will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be
subject to economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control and will be substantially dependent on the selling prices and demand for our
products, customer demands for marketing allowances and other concessions, raw material costs, and
our ability to successfully implement our overall business strategy, including acquisitions. If a
violation of any of the covenants occurs in the future, we would attempt to obtain a waiver or an
amendment from our bank. No assurance can be given that we would be successful in this regard.
Receivable Discount Program
Our liquidity has been positively impacted by receivable discount programs we have established with
two of our customers and their respective banks. Under this program, we have the option to sell
those customers receivables to
20
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
those banks at a discount to be agreed upon at the time the
receivables are sold. The discount under this program averaged 4.5% during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and has allowed us to accelerate collection of receivables aggregating $16,406,000 by
an average of 310 days. While this arrangement has reduced our working capital needs, there can be
no assurance that it will continue in the future. These programs resulted in interest costs of
$609,000 in during the three months ended June 30, 2008. These interest costs would increase if
interest rates rise, if utilization of this discounting arrangement expands and if the discount
period is extended to reflect more favorable payment terms to customers. In May 2008, one of these
customers elected to suspend the use of its receivable discount program, but has advised us that it
may be in a position to re-open the use of this program sometime in the future. We cannot provide
assurance that the program will continue or that a similar program with another customer will be
established.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2008, we had no off-balance sheet financing or other arrangements with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships (such as entities often referred to as structured finance or
special purpose entities) established for purposes of facilitating off-balance sheet financing or
other debt arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Capital Expenditures and Commitments
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were $847,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008, including the
capital expenditures acquired under capital leases. A significant portion of these expenditures
relate to IT equipment and improvements at our Torrance, California location. The amount and timing
of future capital expenditures may vary depending on the final build-out schedule for the Mexico
production and logistics facility. We expect our fiscal 2009 capital expenditure to be in the range
of $2.5 million to $3.5 million. We expect to use our working capital and incur additional capital
lease obligations to finance these capital expenditures.
Customs Duties
We received a request for information dated April 16, 2007 from the U.S. Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection, or CBP, concerning the importation of products remanufactured at our
Malaysian facilities. In response to the CBPs request, we began an internal review, with the
assistance of customs counsel, of our custom duties procedures. During this review process, we
identified a potential exposure related to the omission of certain cost elements in the appraised
value of used alternators and starters, which were remanufactured in Malaysia and returned to the
United States since June 2002.
We also provided a prior disclosure letter dated June 5, 2007 to the customs authorities in order
to obtain more time to complete our internal review process. This prior disclosure letter also
provides us the opportunity to self report any underpayment of customs duties in prior years which
could reduce financial penalties, if any, imposed by the CBP. Based on our review, we determined
that it was probable the CBP would make a claim for additional duties, fees and interest on the
value of remanufactured units shipped back to us from Malaysia. Therefore, we recorded an accrual
for $1,836,000 as of March 31, 2008, representing the estimated maximum value of the probable
claim.
On February 7, 2008, we responded to the CBP with the results of our internal review for products
shipped back to the us during the period from June 5, 2002 to March 31, 2007. In connection with
this response, we paid approximately $278,000 to the CBP, which included the payment of duties,
fees, and interest on the value of certain components that were used in the remanufacture of the
products shipped back to us. On May 6, 2008, we paid an additional $126,000 to the CBP covering
duties, fees and interest on the value of certain components that were used in the remanufacture of
the products shipped back to us during the period from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008. These
payments reduced the accrued liability recorded in connection with the claim.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we received notification from the CBP stating that the
prior disclosure had been reviewed and determined to be valid, therefore, no further penalties are
likely to be assessed and the review was closed regarding remanufactured units shipped back to us
from Malaysia. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the accrual of $1,307,000 was
reversed, reducing cost of goods sold.
21
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Litigation
In December 2003, the SEC and the United States Attorneys Office brought actions against Richard
Marks, our former President and Chief Operating Officer. (Mr. Marks is also the son of Mel Marks,
our founder, largest shareholder and member of our Board of Directors.) Mr. Marks ultimately pled
guilty to several criminal charges in June 2005.
In June 2006, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with Mr. Marks. Under this
agreement (which was unanimously approved by a Special Committee of the Board of Directors
consisting of Messrs. Borneo, Gay and Siegel), Mr. Marks agreed to pay us $682,000 as partial
reimbursement of the legal fees and costs we had advanced pursuant our pre-existing indemnification
agreements with Mr. Marks. This amount was due on January 15, 2008. In June 2006, we recorded a
shareholder note receivable for the $682,000 Mr. Marks owes us. The note is classified in
shareholders equity as it is collateralized by our common stock. Mr. Marks also agreed to pay
interest at the prime rate plus one percent on June 15, 2007 (paid on June 22, 2007) and January
15, 2008 (paid on January 22, 2008). Mr. Marks pledged 80,000 shares of our common stock that he
owns to secure this obligation. If at any time the market price of the stock pledged by Mr. Marks
was less than 125% of Mr. Marks obligation, he was required to pledge additional stock to maintain
not less than the 125% coverage level. Under the terms of an amendment to the agreement with Mr.
Marks that was effective January 15, 2008, we agreed to extend the due date of Mr. Marks
obligation to pay $682,000 from January 15, 2008 to July 15, 2008. This amendment was unanimously
approved by the Special Committee of the Board of Directors that had approved the original
Settlement Agreement. Mr. Marks agreed to pledge an additional 31,500 shares of our common stock
that he owns to secure this obligation and any additional shares necessary to maintain no less than
a 140% coverage level. Mr. Marks also agreed to pay interest at the prime rate plus three percent
during the extension period. In March 2008 and May 2008, Mr. Marks pledged an additional 20,528 and
33,492 shares, respectively, to maintain the necessary coverage level of 140%.
On July 22, 2008, we acquired 108,534 shares of our common stock which had been pledged by Mr.
Marks in satisfaction of the $682,000 shareholder note receivable plus interest accrued from
January 15, 2008 through July 22, 2008, and the remaining shares pledged as collateral were
released to Mr. Marks.
We are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of business. Management does not
believe that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial
position or future results of operations.
Related Party Transactions
Our related party transactions primarily consist of employment and director agreements and stock
option agreements. Except as noted in the Litigation discussion above, our related party
transactions have not changed since March 31, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates that are
presented in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008, except as
discussed below.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also
established a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value
measurement. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. However, a FASB Staff Position issued in February 2008, delayed
the effectiveness of SFAS No. 157 for one year, but only as applied to nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 on April 1, 2008 did not have an impact on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
22
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
The hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as
of the measurement date. The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is
based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement. The three levels are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuation is based upon unobservable inputs that are significant to the
fair value measurement. |
The following table summarizes the valuation of our short-term investments and financial
instruments by the above SFAS No. 157 categories as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
Using Inputs Considered as |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
395,000 |
|
|
$ |
395,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
|
349,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
349,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our short-term investments, which fund our deferred compensation liabilities, consist of
investments in mutual funds. These investments are classified as Level 1 as the shares of these
mutual funds trade with sufficient frequency and volume to enable us to obtain pricing information
on an ongoing basis.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are primarily measured based on the foreign
currency spot and forward rates quoted by the banks or foreign currency dealers.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure at fair
value certain financial instruments and other items that are not currently required to be measured
at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We
adopted SFAS No. 159 on April 1, 2008 and elected not to measure any additional financial
instruments or other items at fair value.
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)).
SFAS No. 141(R) applies to any transaction or other event that meets the definition of a business
combination. Where applicable, SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer recognizes and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, non-controlling
interest in the acquiree and goodwill or gain from a bargain purchase. In addition, SFAS No. 141(R)
determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. Also in December 2007, the FASB issued
Statement No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160).
This Statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 are required to be
adopted simultaneously and are effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 with earlier adoption
being prohibited. We do not currently have any non-controlling interests in our subsidiaries. Both
SFAS No. 141(R) and SFAS No. 160 are adopted prospectively, therefore they do not have any current
impact.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 changes
the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures
23
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB
Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The
guidance in SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS No. 161
encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption.
We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 161.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Principles
(SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 outlines the order of authority for the sources of accounting
principles. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not expect SFAS No. 162 to have any
impact on our consolidated financial statements and required disclosures.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as
of March 31, 2008, which was filed on June 16, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act),
under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the 1934 Act, as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and to provide
reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving
their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our disclosure
controls and procedures will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter
how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, there have not been any changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Limitation on Payment of DividendsThe Credit Agreement prohibits the declaration or payment of any
dividends other than dividends payable in the capital stock of the Company.
24
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Certification of Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
25
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA, INC
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ David Lee
|
|
|
|
David Lee |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 11, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Kevin Daly
|
|
|
|
Kevin Daly |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
26