e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended: September 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 1-34033
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-1532464 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
11001 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(952) 912-3444
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last
business day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $264,853,102
based on a closing price of $10.56 per common share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Shares of common stock outstanding as of November 17, 2011: 25,641,647
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III hereto.
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements as that term
is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
The words believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, target, may, will, expect, plan,
project, should, or continue or the negative thereof or other expressions, which are
predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters,
identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on information available to us as
of the time of such statements and relate to, among other things, expectations of the business
environment in which we operate, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the
market and statements regarding our mission and vision. Forward-looking statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Our future operating results and performance trends may be affected by a number of factors,
including, without limitation, those described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K. Those
risk factors, and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified from time to time in our
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q and our registration statements, could cause our actual future results to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors
set forth in our various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and of changes in
general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and/or exchange rates and changes in the
assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements.
General Background and Product Offerings
Digi International Inc. (Digi, we, our or us) was incorporated in 1985 as a Minnesota
corporation. We were reorganized as a Delaware corporation in 1989 in conjunction with our initial
public offering. Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
DGII. Our World Headquarters is located at 11001 Bren Road East, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343. Our
telephone number is (952) 912-3444.
We are a leading provider of machine to machine (M2M) networking products and solutions that enable
the connection, monitoring and control of local or remote physical assets by electronic means.
These networking products and solutions connect communication hardware to a physical asset so that
information about the assets status and performance can be sent to a computer system and used to
improve or automate one or more processes. Increasingly these products and solutions are deployed
via wireless networks. This is because the business or institution seeking to monitor or control a
remote physical asset may not have access to the site where it is located or may not have
economical access to a wired network. Our hardware products have been the historical foundation of
our business. In 2009, we introduced a cloud-based internet platform (iDigi®) which our customers
can utilize to monitor and control electronic devices.
Our products are deployed by a wide range of businesses and institutions. We focus a significant
amount of our development, sales and marketing efforts on four vertical markets that represent
significant opportunities to expand our business: energy monitoring and management, fleet vehicle
tracking, medical monitoring and reporting and storage tank monitoring and control.
3
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
Our hardware product net sales represented 95.5%, 96.7% and 97.0% of our total net sales in fiscal
2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our non-product revenue, which represented 4.5%, 3.3% and 3.0%
of our total net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily includes wireless
product design and development services. We also have revenues from cloud-based services,
post-contract customer support, fees associated with technical support, training, royalties and the
sale of software licenses.
Our suite of products and solutions primarily includes:
|
|
|
Embedded and non-embedded hardware products and related software solutions which have
been the historical foundation of our business. We report our results based on these two
product categories (including services and software offerings, which are included in our
embedded product category because they do not represent a significant portion of our
overall sales at this time): |
|
|
|
An embedded product is incorporated by a product developer into an electronic device
such as a utility meter, an environmental sensor or a medical instrument to provide
processing power and wired or wireless connectivity to the device. In order to be
properly integrated into the device our product normally requires some custom hardware
and/or software development. Examples of embedded products include: modules, single
board computers, chips and software and development tools. |
|
|
|
A non-embedded product is connected externally to a device or larger system to
provide network connectivity or port expansion. Our non-embedded products often require
no additional hardware development, but often are designed to permit the addition of
customized software. Non-embedded products provide an economical way to network-enable
previously deployed electronic devices. Examples of non-embedded products include:
cellular products, console servers, serial cards, serial servers, USB connected products
and wireless communication adaptors. |
|
|
|
Wireless product design and development services to provide customers turn-key wireless
networking products that can use a wide range of wireless technology platforms. These
services are reported under our embedded product category. |
|
|
|
The iDigi® M2M cloud-based service. iDigi® enables customers to connect enterprise
applications to remote electronic devices. This allows for devices to be monitored and
controlled remotely and lets customers easily collect, interpret and utilize data from many
devices to operate their businesses more efficiently. iDigi® sales are reported under our
embedded product category. |
For more in-depth descriptions of our primary hardware product sets, please refer to the heading
Listing of Principal Products at the end of Part I. Item 1. of this report on Form 10-K.
Our corporate website address is www.digi.com. In the About Us Investor Relations section of our
website, we make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports
on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports available free of charge as soon as reasonably
practicable after these reports are filed with or furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). Each of these documents can also be obtained free of charge
(except for a reasonable charge for duplicating exhibits to our reports on Form 10-K, 10-Q or 8-K)
in print by any stockholder who requests them from our investor relations personnel. The Investor
Relations email address is ir@digi.com and its mailing address is: Investor
4
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
Relations Administrator, Digi International Inc., 11001 Bren Road East, Minnetonka, Minnesota
55343. These reports can also be accessed via the SEC website, www.sec.gov, or via the
SECs Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information
concerning the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report or any other report we
file with or furnish to the SEC.
Industry and Marketplace Conditions
Long-Term Growth Prospects
We believe the marketplace for M2M networking products and applications is poised for significant
long-term growth. We also believe our company is well positioned to capitalize on this potential
growth given the depth of our experience and expertise in developing M2M networking products and
solutions. We expect there to be significant growth opportunities for our historical hardware
business. We expect hardware that supports wireless networking connections to be the focal point
of this growth. Further, for us to fully participate in the overall growth of M2M networking
solutions, we will need to focus a considerable amount of our resources on the development and sale
of software applications and solutions. We expect the M2M networking marketplace will attract a
wide range of competitors, many of whom likely will have significantly more resources and
operational scale than us.
We believe M2M networking is poised for significant long-term growth for two primary reasons:
|
|
|
The cost of connecting devices, sensors, machines, or other assets has dropped
dramatically over the past several years; and |
|
|
|
Businesses and institutions want and need to operate more efficiently and productively
in a competitive global marketplace. |
With tens of billions of electronic devices deployed around the world, we believe the capacity of
organizations to conduct more efficient operations by gathering and analyzing data is immense. The
willingness of organizations to deploy networking products and applications to capture and analyze
that data will depend on how efficiently these networking solutions can be deployed and maintained.
We therefore believe a critical element in our ability to grow our business will be whether we can
continue to effectively develop and market M2M networking products and solutions at price points
that can provide customers with demonstrable return on their investment.
Short-Term Impacts of Global Macro-Economic Conditions
While we believe the long-term prospects for M2M networking are strong, we also feel this
marketplace is susceptible to downturns in general economic conditions. Sales cycles for
networking equipment and solutions can be long and require significant expenditures from customers.
In turn, the willingness of customers to make purchases in times of economic or regulatory
uncertainty can be compromised. For instance, in the recent period of economic volatility we have
noticed that energy utilities have delayed deployment of networking solutions that might upgrade
the ability to manage energy usage. Similarly, we believe the regulatory uncertainty that
surrounds the medical industry could also result in deployment delays of networking solutions, some
or all of which may involve our products and solutions.
5
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
Strategy
Long-Term Goal
Our long-term goal is to be the leading global provider of wireless M2M networking products and
end-to-end solutions that enable electronic devices to be provisioned, maintained, monitored,
analyzed and managed remotely. We consider end-to-end capabilities to require the following
components:
|
|
|
design services which develops the customers need into a hardware design suitable for
the task; |
|
|
|
the production of prototypes testing and certification (if required) to ready the device
for market; |
|
|
|
assistance in connecting the devices to the customers application, or, if needed,
develop an application for the customer; and |
|
|
|
production and support of the final product. |
To achieve this goal we intend to:
|
|
|
continue to develop, manufacture and market a wide range of hardware products that have
been the historical backbone of our business since its inception; and |
|
|
|
expand and enhance our deployment of software applications and cloud-based platform
solutions that enable electronic devices to interface with business applications. |
Current Business Initiatives
We are particularly focused on the following strategic business initiatives, each of which is
designed to advance our long-term goal:
|
1. |
|
Continued delivery of products and solutions to the following four vertical markets
that we believe promise extensive growth opportunities: energy, fleet, medical and tank
monitoring; |
|
2. |
|
The enhanced development of software applications, services and our iDigi® cloud-based
platform and a migration of sales and marketing efforts towards end-to-end solutions as
opposed to sales of hardware products alone; and |
|
3. |
|
The further expansion of strategic relationships with leading manufacturers,
application providers and systems integrators. |
Vertical Sales Markets. We are focused on further expanding our sales in the energy,
fleet, medical and tank monitoring vertical markets. We believe each of these markets possesses
the potential for significant long-term growth. We believe our sales growth in these areas may
come from internal initiatives to expand our product offerings through research and development,
through added sales and marketing resources or from acquisitions of new businesses, products or
sales channels that are related to our current product and solutions offerings.
|
|
|
Energy Our solutions provide connectivity, control and support of devices in the
energy industry to improve its efficiency, security and reliability. Our products are
deployed in applications that include renewable energy sources and utilities such as gas, water and
electric. Migrating to IP-based network communications can be a challenge for utility
companies, due to compatibility issues between field equipment and the applications
available to monitor and manage them. Our solutions enable companies to network-enable
existing products in the field without replacing hardware or rewriting existing application
software. Among other uses, our products are deployed in Automated Meter Reading (AMR),
Automated Meter Intelligence (AMI), Energy Management Services, Distribution Automation and
other smart energy applications. Using our gateways and modules and the iDigi® platform, end users of energy also can be actively
engaged with energy producers through devices in their homes or offices such as meters and
in-home displays. |
6
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
|
|
|
Fleet Our solutions improve efficiency, reduce costs and meet government regulations
for connecting, tracking, monitoring and managing fleets of vehicles and containers. We
provide equipment and applications primarily focused on long-haul trucking, but extending
to other areas of public and private fleets, including taxis, public transit, emergency
service vehicles, heavy equipment and others. Applications also include container
tracking, logistical tracking, stolen vehicle recovery, and recording driver behavior
metrics. |
|
|
|
Medical Our solutions provide a way to enable medical equipment and devices to
receive, monitor, control and report patient information quickly, easily, and accurately.
They utilize the hospitals existing Ethernet or wireless network and improve patient care
and reduce operating costs. |
|
|
|
Tank We provide solutions for remote monitoring and control of storage tanks that
contain liquids, solids and gases. Tank monitoring can reduce supply chain costs by
insuring tank-stored inputs to various processes are available and of necessary quality.
Our solutions utilize our wired and wireless communication gateways, ZigBee modules and
adapters to enable the transmission of data. The iDigi® platform also provides management,
messaging and storage services to connect tanks with customized tank management software
applications. |
Enhanced Development and Sales of Services and the iDigi® Platform. Historically our
hardware devices were utilized by customers with specific device connectivity needs often using
wired as opposed to wireless connections. Over time, more and more of our customers have sought
broader based wireless solutions that link numerous devices in various locations to software
applications that enable them to monitor, control and analyze device performance remotely. In turn
we have evolved our capacity to deliver these solutions.
We believe the business potential associated with delivering end-to-end wireless solutions is
significant. Through the use of our iDigi® platform, we can derive recurring revenue streams that
are not normally associated with sales of hardware. If we want to remain a leader in M2M
networking solutions, we believe we must continue to evolve our capabilities to develop and sell
software applications as well as our iDigi® cloud-based networking platform.
While we are pleased with our progress our evolution into a company that sells both hardware and
software solutions and related services presents challenges. For instance, sales of end-to-end
solutions often involve more interactions with different functions and individuals within our
customers organizations than sales of our hardware products. The product development demands and
customer support requirements also are different. In order to evolve our business to meet these
challenges, we likely will expend more research and development resources on this initiative
relative to the level of sales these solutions presently represent in our business. We also may
find it appropriate to acquire businesses, solution sets or sales channels in an effort to expand
our capabilities and accelerate our growth.
Further Expansion of Strategic Relationships. We have established relationships with many
of the worlds largest equipment vendors. We have strategic sales relationships with leading
vendors, allowing them to ship our products and services as component parts of their overall
solutions. These vendors include, among others, Comverge, Inc., Xata and Itron. Many of the
worlds leading telecommunications companies and Internet service providers also rely on our
products, including AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp., Verizon Communications Inc. and Siemens AG.
7
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
As the marketplace for M2M connectivity solutions continues to expand, we believe there will be
more opportunities for us to expand the number of strategic relationships we maintain with
equipment vendors, telecommunications service providers and systems integrators and to broaden
their scope. Like many of our customers, our strategic partners are also seeking to deploy more
intelligent network enabled devices and broader based end-to-end solutions to service their
customers and end users. We therefore intend to focus more of our sales resources to further
leverage our evolving expertise to provide a greater breadth of product and solutions offerings to
our existing and potential strategic sales relationships.
Acquisitions
We have completed several acquisitions in the past five fiscal years that are consistent with our
corporate strategy.
|
|
|
In April 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), a leader in the European
wireless router market. Sarian designs and develops advanced wireless/cellular IP-based
routing equipment for mission critical applications. Sarian developed its own
comprehensive IP-based operating system and software and can offer customers technical
excellence, flexibility and rapid customization. Sarian had a strong customer base in ATM
connectivity, retail and payment systems connectivity, remote monitoring telemetry, lottery
terminal connectivity and wireless backup of wired broadband connections. |
|
|
|
In July 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), a leading design
services organization. Spectrum is a wholly owned subsidiary of Digi International Inc.
Spectrum focuses on solving a customers wireless development challenges. Spectrums
engineers have extensive experience in wireless technologies such as Global System for
Mobile communication (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Global Positioning System
(GPS), Wi-Fi and proprietary radio frequency (RF) as well as Application Specific
Integrated Circuit (ASIC) design, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) integration,
embedded software and complete turn-key product development which allows them to address
virtually any wireless development need. |
|
|
|
In June 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private
Limited (MobiApps), a developer of M2M communications technology focusing on satellite,
cellular and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps has locations in India,
Singapore and in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreements, we
acquired the U.S. assets located in Herndon, Virginia. In addition, we established two
subsidiaries, Digi Wireless Singapore Pte. Ltd. and Digi m2m Solutions India Private
Limited, which acquired the assets of MobiApps affiliate companies, located in Singapore
and India, respectively. |
Sales Channels
We sell our products through a global network of distributors, systems integrators, value added
resellers (VARs) and to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
Distributors
Our larger distributors, based on sales we make to them, include Synnex, Arrow Electronics,
Inc./NuHorizons, Ingram Micro, Tech Data Corporation, Future Electronics, Miel, Atlantik Elektronik
GmbH, and Express Systems & Peripherals. We also maintain relationships with many other
distributors in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Asia and Latin America. Additionally, we maintain strong
relationships with catalog distributors such as CDW, Insight, Digi-Key and Mouser Electronics.
8
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
Strategic Sales Relationships and Partnerships
We maintain strategic alliances with other industry leaders to develop and market technology
solutions. These include many major communications hardware and software vendors, operating system
suppliers, computer hardware manufacturers, cellular carriers and Smart Grid vendors. Among
others, key partners include: VMware, Ember, Freescale, Qualcomm, Ericsson, Itron, AT&T, Sprint,
Verizon, Bell Mobility, Rogers and several other cellular carriers worldwide. Furthermore, we
maintain a worldwide network of authorized developers that extends our reach into certain other
technology applications and geographical regions.
Our customer base includes some of the worlds largest equipment vendors. We have strategic sales
relationships with leading vendors, allowing them to ship our products and services as component
parts of their overall solutions. These vendors include, among others, Comverge, Inc., Xata and
Itron. Many of the worlds leading telecommunications companies and Internet service providers
also rely on our products, including AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp., Verizon Communications Inc.
and Siemens AG.
No single customer comprised more than 10% of our net sales for any of the years ended September
30, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Competition
We compete in the communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid technological
advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product
introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the
basis of existing and planned product features, service and software application capabilities,
company reputation, brand recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and
reliability, product development capabilities, price and availability. While we have no
competitors that carry a comparable range of products, we do have various competitors based on
specific products. We believe both as the marketplace for M2M connectivity products and solutions
continues to expand and grow and as we continue to expand our product and service offerings, it is
likely we will encounter increased competition; potentially from parties who have significantly
more resources than we possess.
Manufacturing Operations
Our manufacturing operations are conducted through a combination of internal manufacturing and
external subcontractors specializing in various parts of the manufacturing process. We rely on
third party foundries for our semiconductor devices (ASICs). This approach allows us to reduce our
fixed costs, maintain production flexibility and optimize our profits.
Our products are manufactured to our designs with standard and semi-custom components. Most of
these components are available from multiple vendors. We have several single-sourced supplier
relationships, either because alternative sources are not available or because the relationship is
advantageous to us. If these suppliers are unable to provide a timely and reliable supply of
components, we could experience manufacturing delays that could adversely affect our consolidated
results of operations.
In July 2011 we announced a restructuring of our manufacturing operations in Breisach, Germany.
The restructuring reduced our manufacturing footprint by consolidating prototype functions and
centralized outsourced production control in our Eden Prairie, Minnesota production facility. The
consolidation was driven by our strategy of driving efficiency improvements and enhancing customer
service globally through more centralized operations.
9
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
On October 26, 2011, we announced that flooding in Thailand had impacted the operations of our
contract manufacturer located near Bangkok, Thailand. The main manufacturing facility is currently
closed, although efforts are underway to restore operations at the contract manufacturers back-up
facility, which has not currently been impacted by flooding and is also located in Bangkok. In
addition, we are working on reallocating production normally done in Thailand to our U.S.
manufacturing facility, as well as other contract manufacturers we currently use. We presently
anticipate that the Thailand flooding and the resulting impact on our subcontract manufacturer in
Thailand will decrease revenue in a range of approximately $2 million to $6 million for the first
fiscal quarter of 2012, and gross margin will decrease by approximately two percentage points in
the first fiscal quarter of 2012. We expect that the impact of the Thailand flooding for the full
fiscal year 2012 will have a minimal impact on revenue, and the impact to gross margin will be
approximately one percentage point. We expect that earnings per diluted share for fiscal 2012 will
be reduced by approximately $0.07 due to the revenue and gross margin impact previously described. At this time
the situation in Thailand continues to evolve and we can offer no assurance that the impact our
operations and financial results will not be different than the present expectations we have
outlined above.
Seasonality
In general, our business is not considered to be highly seasonal, although our first fiscal quarter
revenue is often less than other quarters due to holidays and fewer shipping days.
Working Capital
We fund our business operations through a combination of cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities and cash generated from operations. We believe that our current financial resources,
cash generated from operations, and our capacity for debt and/or equity financing will be
sufficient to fund our business operations for the next twelve months and beyond.
Research & Development and Intellectual Property Rights
During fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, our research and development expenditures were $31.6
million, $27.8 million and $26.4 million, respectively. As we expand our capabilities with respect
to software applications and our iDigi® cloud-based platform, we expect to spend a disproportionate
amount of our research and development resources on these initiatives relative to the percent of
sales they generate for our company at present.
Due to rapidly changing technology in the communications technology industry, we believe that our
success depends primarily upon the product development skills of our personnel, and the ability to
integrate acquired technologies with organically developed technologies. We have incurred
in-process research and development charges in connection with our past acquisitions, which were
expensed upon consummation of the acquisitions. Effective October 1, 2009 in-process research and
development costs are capitalized according to new authoritative guidance issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) related to business combinations. Such acquired in-process
research and development charges will be disclosed separately and will be incremental to our
research and development expenditures discussed above. Since this new guidance was effective, we
have not completed any acquisitions.
Our proprietary rights and technology are protected by a combination of copyrights, trademarks,
trade secrets and patents.
10
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
We have established common law and registered trademark rights on a family of marks for a number of
our products. Our products are sold under the Digi, Rabbit, iDigi®, Digi m-Trak and Spectrum
brands. We believe that the Digi and Rabbit brands have established strong identities with our
targeted customer base and our customers associate the Digi brand with reliability and the Rabbit
brand with ease of integration. Many of our customers choose us because they are building a very
complex system solution and they want the highest level in product reliability. In the core module
and semiconductor application environments, we believe ease of integration is a powerful brand
identity.
Our patents are applicable to specific technologies and currently are valid for varying periods of
time based on the date of patent application or patent grant in the U.S. and the legal term of
patents in the various foreign countries where patent protection is obtained. We believe our
intellectual property has significant value and is an important factor in the marketing of our
company and products.
Backlog
Backlog as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $36.4 million and $26.8 million, respectively. Most
of the backlog at September 30, 2011 is expected to be shipped in fiscal 2012. Our backlog
increase as of September 30, 2011 as compared to September 30, 2010 primarily is due to an increase
in wireless customer orders. Backlog as of any particular date is not necessarily indicative of
our future sales trends.
Employees
We had 691 employees on September 30, 2011. We consider our relations with our employees to be
good.
Geographic Areas and Currency Risks
Our customers are located throughout North America, Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA), Asia and
Latin America. We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions
being denominated in Euros, British Pounds, Japanese Yen and Indian Rupee and foreign currency
translation risk as the financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy
to reduce foreign currency risk.
During 2011, we had approximately $85.5 million of net sales related to foreign customers including
export sales, of which $28.8 million was denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro
and British Pound. During both 2010 and 2009, we had approximately $75.2 million of net sales to
foreign customers including export sales, of which $27.6 million and $33.4 million, respectively,
were denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro and British Pound. In future periods,
we expect a significant portion of sales will continue to be made in Euros and British Pounds.
Financial information about geographic areas appears in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements in this Form 10-K.
LISTING OF PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS
Embedded Networking Products
Modules Developing a device around a chip or microprocessor involves a high level of complexity.
A module is a group of components that are set up to work together, eliminating much of that
complexity. An embedded module may provide somewhat less flexibility than a chip, but is much
easier to implement into a product design. A number of these modules can be connected directly to
iDigi®, enabling remote management and remote application connectivity.
11
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
LISTING OF PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
Our modules can be divided into two categories: processor modules and communications modules.
Processor modules provide customers with a networked platform for use as the main processor in an
embedded system and the flexibility to add in custom features and functionality, as this ensures a
quick time to market development cycle for a network-enabled device. These modules are targeted as
the core processors for products such as access control systems, Smart Energy devices,
Point-of-Sale (POS) systems, Radio Frequency ID (RFID) readers, medical devices and instrumentation
and networked displays. Communication modules are ideal for network-enabling and web-enabling a
device. They enable customers who wish to easily accommodate both wired and wireless functionality
in one product design. These modules make it very easy to add most any type of connectivity,
especially wireless connectivity. Typically with a communication module, there is another
processor performing the central processing. Adding wired or wireless network communication to a
device allows companies to manage that device over a network or by electronic means.
Integrated Circuits (Chips) A chip (or microprocessor) provides the brains and processing
power of an intelligent electronic device or communication sub-system. Some of our higher volume
customers choose to purchase chips and build their own products. Chips are low cost but require
the highest level of development expertise. Building a solution from the chip level offers a low
cost of the end design, but the level of complexity in product development can increase risk and
prolong time to market.
Our chips are the building blocks for many of our embedded and non-embedded products. By using our
own microprocessors we can ensure complete hardware/software compatibility for product designs for
certain of our products. We no longer develop new chips and now use Commercial Off the Shelf
(COTS) technology from companies such as Freescale and Ember for our new products, as we do not
have a core competency in the semi-conductor business and we believe that it is more effective to
partner with companies who can provide this expertise.
Software and Development Tools Coupled with the chips and modules are a variety of development
tools and associated software to make application development easy. We provide software and tools
for a variety of operating environments and developer skill sets. These include Linux® and
Microsoft® Windows® Embedded CE as well as our own Net+OS, Dynamic C and Python based iDigi® Dia.
Single Board Computers Single-board computers (SBCs) are complete systems on a single circuit
board. They are essentially a programmable box product without the enclosure everything is on
the board and ready to be embedded into a larger system. They offer the same benefits as the
processor modules, but eliminate the need for additional interface circuitry because they include
all of the key device interface components on one circuit board.
Satellite Communication Devices Our acquisition of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited (MobiApps)
in June 2009 added satellite communication products that provide worldwide satellite data
transmit/receive capabilities for customers involved in satellite-based tracking and industrial
remote communications. Operating over the ORBCOMM low-earth orbit satellite network, these
products can significantly improve asset utilization by allowing clients to monitor, track and
manage their fixed and mobile assets around the world. In fiscal 2011, we added the support of the
Iridium satellite network to some of our gateway products.
12
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
LISTING OF PRINCIPLE PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
Non-Embedded Networking Products
Cellular Products:
|
|
Routers Cellular routers provide connectivity for devices over a cellular data network.
They can be used as a cost effective alternative to landlines for primary or backup
connectivity for hard to reach sites and devices. We introduced the first intelligent
high-speed cellular router in 2005 to address the growing need for customers to connect
remote sites and devices. These products have been certified by the major wireless providers
in North America and abroad, including AT&T®, Verizon Wireless®, Sprint®, Bell Mobility and
Rogers. All of our cellular products include a unique remote management platform that
provides secure management of devices across remote networks and can all use iDigi® for
remote management. In addition, application connectivity, management and customization is
enabled via the iDigi® platform for many of these products. |
|
|
Gateways A gateway aggregates local wireless data traffic and transports it over a
cellular or other Internet Protocol (IP)-based network, usually back to a central application
or database. Our gateway products enable devices or groups of devices to be networked in
locations where there is no existing network or where access to a network is prohibited.
These gateways can work in conjunction with our wireless adapters and wireless embedded
modules to enable customers to monitor and manage remote devices in a non-intrusive and
economical way. All of our gateway products are linked with iDigi® for secure management of
devices across remote networks, application connectivity and customization. |
Wireless Communication Adapters Our wireless communication adapters are small box products that
utilize a variety of wireless protocols for PC-to-device or device-to-device connectivity, often in
locations where deploying a wired network is not possible either because of cost, disruption or
impracticality. By supporting ZigBee®, Wi-Fi® and proprietary RF technologies, we can meet most
customer application requirements, such as serial cable replacement, Ethernet cable replacement,
mesh networking, low cost/low power remote monitoring, simple I/O control functions, environmental
sensors and long distance connectivity. In conjunction with one of our gateways, wireless
communication adapters plug into iDigi® for remote management, application connectivity and
customization.
Serial Servers Serial Servers (also known as device servers and terminal servers) add wired or
wireless network connectivity to a serial device. They transfer data between a serial port and an
Ethernet network, turning a previously isolated device with a serial port into a fully
collaborative network component. We believe that serial servers will remain an important product
category as Ethernet based serial connections continue to extend beyond their current applications
into many new markets such as building automation, healthcare, process control, and secure console
port management on servers, routers, switches and other network equipment. Many of our serial
servers can also leverage iDigi® for application connectivity, remote management and customization.
Console Servers Console servers, or console management servers, provide access to the serial
ports of network equipment such as servers, routers or switches. Our intelligent console servers
enable customers to access, monitor or manage their network devices across multiple sites, both
remotely over the network or via their console ports even during network outages. These console
servers provide advanced auditing and logging capabilities that complement regulatory compliance
efforts such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
13
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
BUSINESS (CONTINUED) |
LISTING OF PRINCIPLE PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
USB Connected Products The Universal Serial Bus (USB) is a plug-and-play interface between a
computer and peripheral devices. In recent years, many serial ports on PCs have been replaced with
USB ports, due in large part to the usability and cost effectiveness of USB devices. We have one
of the most comprehensive and advanced USB port expansion product lines in the industry. Our
USB-to-serial converters enable customers to expand a single USB port into multiple serial ports to
connect legacy peripheral devices. The product line also includes USB hubs that add additional USB
or powered USB ports, which are often used in retail environments, and a network-enabled hub that
connects USB devices over an IP network, which is an industry first.
Serial Cards A serial card plugs into the expansion slot of a computer to provide serial ports
for device connectivity. We are a global leader in this category and offer one of the most
extensive serial card product families. Our products support a wide range of operating systems,
port densities, bus types, expansion options and applications. As Ethernet connections extend
beyond current applications, the serial card products are gradually transitioning to
network-attached and/or USB-attached devices. We have strengthened our product offering to meet
customer needs and fully support this mature product line while working to seamlessly transition
customers to newer technologies.
14
Multiple risk factors exist which could have a material effect on our operations, results of
operations, profitability, financial position, liquidity, capital resources and common stock.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our dependence on new product development and the rapid technological change that characterizes our
industry makes us susceptible to loss of market share resulting from competitors product
introductions and similar risks.
The M2M networking industry is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry
standards, frequent new product introductions, short product life cycles in certain instances and
rapidly changing customer requirements. The introduction of products embodying new technologies
and the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable.
Our future success will depend on our ability to enhance our existing products, to introduce new
products to meet changing customer requirements and emerging technologies, and to demonstrate the
performance advantages and cost-effectiveness of our products over competing products. Failure by
us to modify our products to support new alternative technologies or failure to achieve widespread
customer acceptance of such modified products could cause us to lose market share and cause our
revenues to decline.
We may experience delays in developing and marketing product enhancements or new products that
respond to technological change, evolving industry standards and changing customer requirements.
There can be no assurance that we will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the
successful development, introduction, and marketing of these products or product enhancements, or
that our new products and product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the
marketplace and achieve any significant or sustainable degree of market acceptance in existing or
additional markets. In addition, the future introductions or announcements of products by us or
one of our competitors embodying new technologies or changes in industry standards or customer
requirements could render our then-existing products obsolete or unmarketable. This risk may
become more pronounced as new competitors enter the marketplace, especially if these competitors
have more resources than us to develop new products and technologies. There can be no assurance
that the introduction or announcement of new product offerings by us or one or more of our
competitors will not cause customers to defer their purchase of our existing products, which could
cause our revenues to decline.
We intend to continue to devote significant resources to our research and development, which, if
not successful, could cause a decline in our revenues and harm our business.
We intend to continue to devote significant resources to research and development in the coming
years to enhance and develop additional products. For the fiscal years ended 2011, 2010 and 2009,
our research and development expenses comprised 15.5%, 15.2% and 15.9% respectively, of our net
sales. If we are unable to develop new products, applications and services as a result of our
research and development efforts, or if the products, applications and services we develop are not
successful, our business could be harmed. Even if we develop new products, applications and
services that are accepted by our target markets, the net revenues from these products,
applications and services may not be sufficient to justify our investment in research and
development.
15
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
Many of our products, applications and services have been developed through a combination of
internally developed technologies and acquired technologies. Our ability to continue to develop
new products, applications and services is partially dependent on finding and acquiring new
technologies in the marketplace. Even if we identify new technologies that we believe would be
complementary to our internally developed technologies, we may not be successful in acquiring those
technologies or we may not be able to acquire the technologies at a price that is acceptable to us.
A substantial portion of our recent development efforts have been directed toward the development
of new products targeted to manufacturers of intelligent, network-enabled devices and other
embedded systems in various markets, including markets in which networking solutions for embedded
systems have not historically been sold, such as markets for industrial automation equipment and
medical equipment. In addition, we expect to devote a disproportionate amount of our research and
development resources to the development of software applications and our iDigi® cloud-based
platform relative to the amount of sales those solutions produce for our business presently. Our
financial performance is dependent upon the development of the intelligent device and software
solutions markets that we are targeting, the increasing adoption of these technologies and our
ability to compete successfully and sell our products and solutions.
Certain of our products are sold into mature markets, which could limit our ability to continue to
generate revenue from these products.
Certain of our products are sold into mature markets that are characterized by a trend of declining
demand. These products provide asynchronous and synchronous data transmissions via add-on cards.
As the overall market for these products decreases due to the adoption of new technologies, we
expect that our revenues from these products will continue to decline. As a result, our future
prospects depend in part on our ability to acquire or develop and successfully market additional
products that address growth markets.
Our failure to manage product transitions effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and profitability.
From time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products, capabilities, or technologies
that may replace or shorten the life cycles of our existing products. Announcements of currently
planned or other new products may cause customers to defer or stop purchasing our products until
new products become available. Furthermore, the introduction of new or enhanced products requires
us to manage the transition from older product inventories and ensure that adequate supplies of new
products can be delivered to meet customer demand. Our failure to manage transitions from older
products effectively could result in inventory obsolescence and have a material adverse effect on
our revenues and profitability.
Our failure to compete successfully in our highly competitive market could result in reduced prices
and loss of market share.
The market in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological advances and evolving
industry standards. The market can be affected significantly by new product introductions and
marketing activities of industry participants. Certain of our competitors and potential
competitors may have greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing, and personnel
resources than us. In addition, the amount of competition we face in the marketplace may change
and grow as the market for M2M networking solutions grows and new entrants enter the marketplace.
Present and future competitors may be able to identify new markets and develop products more
quickly, which are superior to those developed by us. They may also
adapt new technologies faster, devote greater resources to research and development, promote
products more aggressively, and price products more competitively than us. Competition may also
intensify or we may no longer be able to compete effectively in the markets in which we compete.
16
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
Our consolidated operating results and financial condition may be adversely impacted by worldwide
economic conditions and credit tightening.
If worldwide economic conditions experience a significant downturn, these conditions may make it
difficult or impossible for our customers and suppliers to accurately forecast and plan future
business activities, which may cause them to slow or suspend spending on products and services.
Our customers may find it difficult to gain sufficient credit in a timely manner, which could
result in an impairment of their ability to place orders with us or to make timely payments to us
for previous purchases. If this occurs, our revenue may be reduced, thereby having a negative
impact on our results of operations. In addition, we may be forced to increase our allowance for
doubtful accounts and our days sales outstanding may increase, which would have a negative impact
on our cash position, liquidity and financial condition. We cannot predict the timing or the
duration of an economic downturn in the economy.
Our inability to obtain the appropriate telecommunications or satellite carrier certifications or
approvals from governmental regulatory bodies could impede our ability to grow revenues in our
wireless products.
The sale of our wireless products in certain geographical markets is sometimes dependent on the
ability to gain telecommunications or satellite carrier certifications and/or approvals by certain
governmental bodies. Failure to obtain these approvals, or delays in receiving the approvals,
could impact our ability to enter our targeted markets or to compete effectively or at all in these
markets and could have an adverse impact on our revenues.
Our participation in a services and solutions model, using cloud-based services, presents execution
and competitive risks.
We are deploying a services and solutions model using our own internally developed hosted services
and cloud-based platform, software, and supporting products. We are employing significant human
and financial resources to develop and deploy this cloud-based platform. While we believe our
wireless, device networking and connectivity expertise, investments in infrastructure, and our
innovative environment provide us with a strong foundation to compete, it is uncertain whether our
strategies will attract the users or generate the revenue required to be successful. Because this
is a relatively new solution in the marketplace, we expect we may encounter competition from other
solutions providers, many of whom may have more significant resources than us with which to
compete. Whether we are successful in this new business model depends on a number of factors,
including:
|
|
|
our ability to effectively put in place and continuously evolve the infrastructure to
deploy our solution; |
|
|
|
the features and functionality of our platform relative to any competing platforms as
well as our ability to effectively market our platform; |
|
|
|
competing effectively in our targeted application markets, including energy, tank
monitoring, fleet management and medical; and |
|
|
|
deploying complete end-to-end solutions that meet the needs of the marketplace generally
as well as the particular requirements of our customers more effectively and efficiently
than competitive solutions. |
17
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
We are dependent on wireless communication networks owned and controlled by others.
Our revenues could decline if we are unable to deliver continued access to satellite and digital
cellular wireless carriers that we depend on to provide sufficient network capacity, reliability
and security to our customers. Our financial condition could be impacted if our wireless carriers
were to increase the prices of their services, or to suffer operational or technical failures.
We do not have any large scale customers that represent more than 10% of our sales and our sales
are subject to fluctuations based on the level of significant one time purchases.
No single customer has represented more than 10% of our sales in any of the last three fiscal
years. In addition, many of our customers make significant one time purchases which are not
repeated. As a result our sales may be subject to significant fluctuations based on whether we are
able to close significant sales opportunities. Our failure to complete one or a series of
significant sales opportunities in a particular fiscal period could have a material adverse effect
on our revenues for that period.
The long and variable sales cycle for certain of our products makes it more difficult for us to
predict our operating results and manage our business.
The sale of our products typically involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of
capital and other resources by potential customers and end users, as well as delays frequently
associated with end users internal procedures to deploy new technologies within their products and
to test and accept new technologies. For these and other reasons, the sales cycle associated with
certain of our products is typically lengthy and is subject to a number of significant risks, such
as end users internal purchasing reviews, that are beyond our control. Because of the lengthy
sales cycle and the large size of certain customer orders, if orders forecasted for a specific
customer are not realized or delayed, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We depend on manufacturing relationships and on limited-source suppliers, and any disruptions in
these relationships may cause damage to our customer relationships.
We procure all parts and certain services involved in the production of our products and
subcontract most of our product manufacturing to outside firms that specialize in such services.
Although most of the components of our products are available from multiple vendors, we have
several single-source supplier relationships, either because alternative sources are not available
or because the relationship is advantageous to us. There can be no assurance that our suppliers
will be able to meet our future requirements for products and components in a timely fashion. In
addition, the availability of many of these components to us is dependent in part on our ability to
provide our suppliers with accurate forecasts of our future requirements. Delays or lost sales
could be caused by other factors beyond our control, including late deliveries by vendors of
components. If we are required to identify alternative suppliers for any of our required
components, qualification and pre-production periods could be lengthy and may cause an increase in
component costs and delays in providing products to customers. Any extended interruption in the
supply of any of the key components currently obtained from limited sources could disrupt our
operations and have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships and profitability. As
an example, on October 26, 2011, we announced that flooding in Thailand had impacted the operations
of our contract manufacturer located near Bangkok, Thailand. As a result of lost production, we
announced that our operations and financial results would be impacted by this natural disaster.
18
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
The impact of natural disasters could negatively impact our supply chain and customers resulting in
an adverse impact to our revenues and profitability.
Certain of our components and other materials used in producing our products are from regions
susceptible to natural disasters as most recently seen in Japan and Thailand. For instance, on
October 26, 2011, we announced that flooding in Thailand had impacted the operations of our
contract manufacturer located near Bangkok, Thailand. As a result of lost production, we announced
that our operations and financial results would be impacted by this natural disaster. If we are
unable to procure these materials, we could experience a disruption to our supply chain that would
hinder our ability to produce our products in a timely manner, or cause us to seek other sources of
supply, which may be more costly or which we may not be able to procure on a timely basis. We also
risk damage to any tooling, equipment or inventory at the suppliers facilities. In addition, our
customers may not follow their normal purchasing patterns or temporarily cease purchasing from us
due to impacts to their businesses in the region, creating unexpected fluctuations or decreases in
our revenues and profitability. Natural disasters in other parts of the world on which our
operations are reliant also could have material adverse impacts on our business.
Our use of suppliers in Southeast Asia involves risks that could negatively impact us.
We purchase printed circuit boards from suppliers in Southeast Asia. Product delivery times may be
extended due to the distances involved, requiring more lead time in ordering. In addition, ocean
freight delays may occur as a result of labor problems, weather delays or expediting and customs
issues. Any extended delay in receipt of the component parts could eliminate anticipated cost
savings and have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships and profitability.
Our ability to compete could be jeopardized if we are unable to protect our intellectual property
rights.
Our ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary rights and technology. Our proprietary
rights and technology are protected by a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and
patents.
We enter into confidentiality agreements with all employees, and sometimes with our customers and
potential customers, and limit access to the distribution of our proprietary information. There
can be no assurance that the steps taken by us in this regard will be adequate to prevent the
misappropriation of our technology. Our pending patent applications may be denied and any patents,
once issued, may be circumvented by our competitors. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that
others will not develop technologies that are superior to our technologies. Despite our efforts to
protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or
to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States.
There can be no assurance that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States
or abroad will be adequate or that competing companies will not independently develop similar
technology. Our failure to adequately protect our proprietary rights could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position and result in loss of revenue.
19
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
From time to time, we are subject to claims and litigation regarding intellectual property rights
or other claims, which could seriously harm us and require us to incur significant costs.
The communications technology industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and
other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we receive notification of a third-party
claim that our products infringe other intellectual property rights. Any litigation to determine
the validity of third-party infringement claims, whether or not determined in our favor or settled
by us, may be costly and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel
from productive tasks, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our
business and service the needs of our customers. There can be no assurance that any infringement
claims by third parties, if proven to have merit, will not materially adversely affect our business
or financial condition. In the event of an adverse ruling in any such matter, we may be required
to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, discontinue
the use of certain processes or be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property
rights of the third party claiming infringement. There can be no assurance that a license would be
available on reasonable terms or at all. Any limitations on our ability to market our products, or
delays and costs associated with redesigning our products or payments of license fees to third
parties, or any failure by us to develop or license a substitute technology on commercially
reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We face risks associated with our international operations and expansion that could impair our
ability to grow our revenues abroad.
We believe that our future growth is dependent in part upon our ability to increase sales in
international markets. These sales are subject to a variety of risks, including fluctuations in
currency exchange rates, tariffs, import restrictions and other trade barriers, unexpected changes
in regulatory requirements, longer accounts receivable payment cycles, potentially adverse tax
consequences, and export license requirements. In addition, we are subject to the risks inherent
in conducting business internationally, including political and economic instability and unexpected
changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. There can be no assurance that one or more of these
factors will not have a material adverse effect on our business strategy and financial condition.
Foreign currency exchange rates may adversely affect our results.
We are exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates on our costs and revenue. Because our financial statements are denominated in U.S.
Dollars and approximately 38% of our revenues are denominated in a currency other than U.S.
Dollars, such as Euros, British Pounds, Indian Rupee and Yen, our sales and earnings may be
adversely impacted if the U.S. dollar strengthens significantly against these foreign currencies.
The loss of key personnel could prevent us from executing our business strategy.
Our business and prospects depend to a significant degree upon the continuing contributions of our
executive officers and key technical and other personnel. Competition for such personnel is
intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining
qualified personnel. Failure to attract and retain key personnel could result in our failure to
execute our business strategy.
20
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
Any acquisitions we have made or will make could disrupt our business and seriously harm our
financial condition.
We will continue to consider acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies.
In the event of any future acquisitions, we could issue stock that would dilute our current
stockholders percentage ownership, incur debt, assume liabilities, or incur large and immediate
write-offs.
Our operation of any acquired business may also involve numerous risks, including but not limited
to:
|
|
problems combining the purchased operations, technologies, or products; |
|
|
|
unanticipated costs; |
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from our core business; |
|
|
|
difficulties integrating businesses in different countries and cultures; |
|
|
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; |
|
|
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and |
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the purchased organization. |
We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products,
technologies, or personnel that we have acquired or that we might acquire in the future and any
failure to do so could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, from time to time, we may enter into
negotiations for a proposed acquisition, but be unable or unwilling to consummate the acquisition
under consideration. This could cause significant diversion of managements attention and
out-of-pocket expenses for us. We could also be exposed to litigation as a result of an
unconsummated acquisition, including claims that we failed to negotiate in good faith or
misappropriated confidential information.
Our failure to comply effectively with the requirements of applicable environmental legislation and
regulation could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Production and marketing of products in certain states and countries may subject us to
environmental and other regulations. In addition, certain states and countries may pass new
regulations requiring our products to meet certain requirements to use environmentally friendly
components. The European Union has issued two directives relating to chemical substances in
electronic products. The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE) makes
producers of certain electrical and electronic equipment financially responsible for collection,
reuse, recycling, treatment and disposal of equipment placed in the European Union market. The
Restrictions of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) bans the use of certain hazardous materials
in electric and electrical equipment which are put on the market in the European Union. In the
future, China and other countries including the United States are expected to adopt further
environmental compliance programs. If we fail to comply with these regulations, we may not be able
to sell our products in jurisdictions where these regulations apply, which could have a material
adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Our failure to comply effectively with regulatory laws pertaining to our foreign operations could
have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
We are required to comply with U.S. government export regulations in the sale of our products to
foreign customers, including requirements to properly classify and screen our products against a
denied parties list prior to shipment. We are also required to comply with the provisions of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and all other anti-corruption laws, such as the UK
Anti-Bribery Act, of all other countries in which we do business, directly or indirectly, including
compliance with the anti-bribery prohibitions and the accounting and
recordkeeping requirements of this law. Violations of the FCPA could trigger sanctions, including
ineligibility for U.S. government insurance and financing, as well as large fines. Failure to
comply with the aforementioned regulations could also deter us from selling our products in
international jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and
profitability.
21
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
Negative conditions in the global credit markets may impair a portion of our investment portfolio.
Our investment portfolio consists of certificates of deposit, commercial paper, money market funds,
corporate bonds and government municipal bonds. These marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale and are carried at fair market value. Some of our investments could experience
reduced liquidity and could result in an impairment charge should the impairment be considered as
other-than-temporary. This loss would be recorded in our consolidated statement of operations,
which could materially adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
Unanticipated changes in our tax rates could affect our future results.
Our future effective tax rates could be favorably or unfavorably affected by unanticipated changes
in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of
our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or our interpretation of such
laws. In addition, we may be subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal
Revenue Service and other U.S. and international tax authorities. We regularly assess the
potential outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have an
effect on our consolidated operating results and financial condition.
We may have additional tax liabilities.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions. Significant
judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes, including our
reserves for uncertain tax positions. In the ordinary course of business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We regularly are
under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final
determination of tax audits could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions
and accruals. The results of an audit could have a material effect on our financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
If our stock price declines, we may need to recognize an impairment of our goodwill.
If the price of our common stock declines and reduces our market value, we could have an impairment
of our goodwill. Our value is dependent upon continued future growth in demand for our products
and solutions. If such growth does not materialize or our forecasts are significantly reduced, our
market value may decline and impair our goodwill. We perform our annual goodwill impairment
assessment on our one reporting unit at June 30 each year.
22
|
|
|
ITEM 1A. |
|
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED) |
The price of our common stock has been volatile and could continue to fluctuate in the future.
The market price of our common stock, like that of many other high-technology companies, has
fluctuated significantly and is likely to continue to fluctuate in the future. During fiscal year
2011, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market ranged from $9.32 to
$15.04 per share. Our closing sale price on November 17, 2011 was $10.53 per share. Announcements
by us or others regarding the receipt of
customer orders, quarterly variations in operating results, acquisitions or divestitures,
additional equity or debt financings, results of customer field trials, scientific discoveries,
technological innovations, litigation, product developments, patent or proprietary rights,
government regulation and general market conditions and risks may have a significant impact on the
market price of our common stock.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter documents have an
anti-takeover effect.
There exist certain mechanisms under the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter documents
that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control. For instance, under Delaware law, we are
prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with interested stockholders for a period
of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder unless certain requirements are met, and majority stockholder approval is required for
certain business combination transactions with interested parties.
Our Certificate of Incorporation contains a fair price provision requiring majority stockholder
approval for certain business combination transactions with interested parties, and this provision
may not be changed without the vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock.
Other mechanisms in our charter documents may also delay, defer or prevent a change of control.
For instance, our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors has authority
to issue series of our preferred stock with such voting rights and other powers as the Board of
Directors may determine. Furthermore, we have a classified board of directors, which means that
our directors are divided into three classes that are elected to three-year terms on a staggered
basis. Since the three-year terms of each class overlap the terms of the other classes of
directors, the entire board of directors cannot be replaced in any one year. Under Delaware law,
directors serving on a classified board may not be removed by shareholders except for cause. Also,
pursuant to the terms of our shareholder rights plan, each outstanding share of common stock has
one attached right. The rights will cause substantial dilution of the ownership of a person or
group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by the Board of Directors and may have the
effect of deterring hostile takeover attempts. The effect of these anti-takeover provisions may be
to deter business combination transactions not approved by our Board of Directors, including
acquisitions that may offer a premium over the market price to some or all stockholders.
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
23
The following table contains a listing of our current property locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership or |
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
Lease |
Location of |
|
|
|
Square |
|
|
Expiration |
Property |
|
Use of Facility |
|
Footage |
|
|
Date |
Minnetonka, MN
(Corporate headquarters)
|
|
Research & development, sales, sales support,
marketing and administration
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eden Prairie, MN
|
|
Manufacturing and warehousing
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
Engineering services
|
|
|
16,837 |
|
|
November 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waltham, MA
|
|
Research & development, sales and sales support
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
October 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing
and administration
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
March 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davis, CA
|
|
Sales, sales support, research & development
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindon, UT
|
|
Sales, marketing, research & development
and administration
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
December 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herndon, VA
|
|
Sales, marketing and tech support
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
October 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hong Kong, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
February 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beijing, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
November 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
June 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dortmund, Germany
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing and
administration
|
|
|
21,485 |
|
|
March 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breisach, Germany
|
|
Sales, marketing, research & development, manufacturing,
warehousing and administration
|
|
|
8,748 |
|
|
July 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuilly sur Seine, France
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
January 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ilkley, UK
|
|
Sales, sales support, research & development and marketing
and administration
|
|
|
5,475 |
|
|
October 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logrono, Spain
|
|
Sales, research & development and administration
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
January 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
November 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bangalore, India
|
|
Sales, research & development and administration
|
|
|
9,189 |
|
|
July 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
June 2014 |
In addition to the above locations, we perform research and development activities in various
other locations in the United States and sales activities in various other locations in Europe and
Asia which are not deemed to be principal locations and which are not listed above. We believe
that our facilities are adequate for our needs. In February 2008, we sold our facility in
Dortmund, Germany and leased back approximately 40% of the property for a period of five years,
with a renewal option for an additional five years. As a result of the restructuring of our
Breisach, Germany location, the manufacturing, warehousing and administration functions at this
location are scheduled to cease at the end of December 2011.
24
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the initial
public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other public
companies. We acquired NetSilicon on February 13, 2002. The complaint names us as a defendant
along with NetSilicon, certain of its officers and certain underwriters involved in NetSilicons
IPO, among numerous others, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO prospectus and
registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained material
misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters in
allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the claims
against the NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation vigorously.
Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed from the
lawsuit, without prejudice, on October 9, 2002.
As previously disclosed, the parties advised the District Court on February 25, 2009 that they had
reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation in its entirety. A stipulation of
settlement was filed with the District Court on April 2, 2009. On June 9, 2009, the District Court
preliminarily approved the proposed global settlement. Notice was provided to the class, and a
settlement fairness hearing, at which members of the class had an opportunity to object to the
proposed settlement, was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued
an order granting final approval to the settlement. Ten appeals initially were filed objecting to
the definition of the settlement class and fairness of the settlement. Five of those appeals were
dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2010. On May 17, 2011, the Court of Appeals dismissed four
of the remaining appeals and remanded the final appeal to the District Court to determine whether
the appellant has standing to object to the settlement. On August 25, 2011, the District Court
ruled that the last remaining objector lacks standing to object to the settlement. That objector
has appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals, and the plaintiffs have moved to dismiss that
appeal.
Under the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us,
and we would bear no financial liability beyond our deductible of $250,000 per claim. While there
can be no guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our
liability insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the
applicable deductible per claim. As of September 30, 2011, we have an accrued liability for the
anticipated settlement of $300,000, which we believe is adequate and reflects the amount of loss
that is probable, and a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000. This $50,000
represents the anticipated settlement of $300,000 less our $250,000 deductible. In the event we
should have losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, the losses could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
Patent Infringement Litigation
On March 16, 2011, MOSAID Technologies Incorporated filed a complaint naming us as defendants in
federal court in the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint included allegations against us and
32 other companies pertaining to the infringement of six patents by products compliant with various
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standards for implementing wireless local area
network computer communications in certain frequency bands. On September 30, 2011 we reached a
settlement involving a royalty-bearing license agreement for future sales of licensed products sold
during the term of the agreement. We do not expect this license agreement to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On January 18, 2011, Advanced Processor Technologies LLC filed a complaint naming us as a
defendant in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint included
allegations against us and eight other companies pertaining to the infringement of two patents
by products containing data processors with memory management units. On October 17, 2011, we
settled the lawsuit for $0.2 million which was recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2011 (see Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements).
25
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED) |
On May 11, 2010, SIPCO, LLC filed a complaint naming us as a defendant in federal court in the
Eastern District of Texas. This claim subsequently has been moved to the Northern District of
Georgia. The complaint included allegations against us and five other companies pertaining to the
infringement of SIPCOs patents by wireless mesh networking and multi-port networking products.
The complaint seeks monetary and non-monetary relief. We cannot predict the outcome of these
matters or estimate a range of loss at this time or whether it will have a materially adverse
impact on our business prospects and our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or
cash flow.
In addition to the matters discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims. Our
management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Stock Listing
Our Common Stock trades under the symbol DGII on the NASDAQ Global Select Market tier of the NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC. On November 17, 2011, the number of holders of our Common Stock was
approximately 9,179, consisting of 165 record holders.
High and low sale prices for each quarter during the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, as
reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, were as follows:
Stock Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
High |
|
$ |
11.62 |
|
|
$ |
12.42 |
|
|
$ |
13.43 |
|
|
$ |
15.39 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
|
$ |
9.41 |
|
|
$ |
10.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
High |
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
$ |
12.32 |
|
|
$ |
11.48 |
|
|
$ |
9.55 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
6.99 |
|
|
$ |
8.87 |
|
|
$ |
7.86 |
|
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
Dividend Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. Our Board of Directors presently intends to
retain all earnings for use in our business, except for periodic stock repurchases, and does not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
26
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES (CONTINUED) |
Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
On July 23, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized an additional 500,000 shares of our common
stock for repurchase under our previously announced stock repurchase program. The total number of
shares authorized to be repurchased is 1,500,000 shares. We did not repurchase any of our equity
securities in the fourth quarter or fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. Of the 1,500,000 shares
authorized to be repurchased, 135,638 shares remained available for repurchase at September 30,
2011.
Performance Evaluation
The graph below compares the total cumulative stockholders return on our Common Stock for the
period from the close of the Nasdaq Stock Market U.S. Companies on September 30, 2006 to
September 30, 2011, the last day of fiscal 2011, with the total cumulative return on the CRSP Total
Return Index for the Nasdaq Stock Market U.S. Companies (the CRSP Index) and the CRSP Index
for Nasdaq Telecommunications Stocks (the Peer Index) over the same period. We have determined
that our line of business is mostly comparable to those companies in the Peer Index. The index
level for the graph and table was set to $100 on September 30, 2006, for our Common Stock, the CRSP
Index and the Peer Index and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY06 |
|
|
FY07 |
|
|
FY08 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY11 |
|
Digi International Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
105.48 |
|
|
|
75.56 |
|
|
|
63.11 |
|
|
|
70.30 |
|
|
|
81.48 |
|
CRSP Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
118.37 |
|
|
|
93.33 |
|
|
|
95.07 |
|
|
|
107.44 |
|
|
|
112.25 |
|
Peer Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
117.24 |
|
|
|
81.31 |
|
|
|
81.12 |
|
|
|
103.20 |
|
|
|
107.49 |
|
27
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
(In thousands except per common share amounts and number of employees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales (1) |
|
$ |
204,160 |
|
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
106,588 |
|
|
$ |
92,209 |
|
|
$ |
81,265 |
|
|
$ |
97,869 |
|
|
$ |
91,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
39,549 |
|
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
33,499 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
24,176 |
|
General and administrative (2) |
|
|
18,206 |
|
|
|
17,889 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
17,037 |
|
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
20,328 |
|
Total other (expense) income, net (3) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
16,515 |
|
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
Income tax provision (4) |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share, basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data as of September 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (total current assets less
total current liabilities) |
|
$ |
142,748 |
|
|
$ |
122,105 |
|
|
$ |
106,121 |
|
|
$ |
112,236 |
|
|
$ |
115,703 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
283,895 |
|
|
$ |
266,965 |
|
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
$ |
271,416 |
|
|
$ |
251,826 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
$ |
260,716 |
|
|
$ |
240,556 |
|
|
$ |
229,586 |
|
|
$ |
231,934 |
|
|
$ |
222,905 |
|
Book value per common share (stockholders equity
divided by outstanding shares) |
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
|
$ |
9.59 |
|
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
|
$ |
9.14 |
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
Number of employees as of September 30 |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Acquisitions provided the following net sales during the year of acquisition: MobiApps in
fiscal 2009 of $0.4 million, Sarian and Spectrum in fiscal 2008 of $6.5 million and MaxStream in
fiscal 2006 of $3.2 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in general and administration expense in fiscal 2010 is investigation and remediation
expenses of $1.4 million ($0.9 million after tax). |
|
(3) |
|
Included in total other (expense) income, net is an other-than-temporary impairment charge of
$1.0 million ($0.7 million after tax) recorded during fiscal 2008 on an investment in a bond issued
by Lehman Brothers. |
|
(4) |
|
In fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded net discrete tax benefits of $0.7 million, $2.3
million and $1.2 million, respectively (see Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). In
fiscal 2008 we reversed income tax reserves of $0.5 million primarily due to the statutory closing
of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and the filing of a prior year tax return and
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns for fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2007, we
reversed income tax reserves of $4.3 million due to the closing of a German tax audit and the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and other discrete tax benefits for
fiscal 2007. |
28
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of machine to machine (M2M) networking products and solutions that enable
the connection, monitoring and control of local or remote physical assets by electronic means.
These networking products and solutions connect communication hardware to a physical asset so that
information about that assets status and performance can be sent to a computer system and used to
improve or automate one or more processes. Increasingly these products and solutions are deployed
via wireless networks. Our hardware products have been the historical foundation of our business.
In 2009, we introduced a cloud-based internet platform (iDigi®) which our customers can utilize to
monitor and control electronic devices. Our products are deployed by a wide range of businesses
and institutions.
We have a single operating and reporting segment. Our revenues consist of products that are in
non-embedded and embedded product categories. Non-embedded products are connected externally to a
device or larger system to provide wired or wireless network connectivity or port expansion, while
embedded products are used by a product developer to build an electronic device in which the
product provides processing power, wired Ethernet, or wireless network connectivity to that device.
The products included in the non-embedded product category include cellular products, wireless
communication adapters, console and serial servers, USB connected products and serial cards. The
products included in the embedded product category include modules, single-board computers, chips,
software and development tools, design services and satellite communication products.
We utilize many financial, operational, and other metrics to evaluate both our financial condition
and our financial performance. Below we highlight the results of those financial metrics that we
feel are most important in these evaluations:
|
|
|
Net Sales were approximately $204 Million. Our net sales were $204.2 million in fiscal
2011, and increased by 11.8% compared to net sales of approximately $182.5 million in
fiscal 2010. Wireless product net sales increased by $18.3 million, providing the majority
of the $21.7 million increase in revenue from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011. |
|
|
|
Gross Profit was approximately $107 Million. Gross profit increased by 15.6% in fiscal
2011 to $106.6 million compared to $92.2 million in fiscal 2010. Our gross margin
increased as a percentage of net sales to 52.2% in fiscal 2011 from 50.5% in fiscal 2010.
We focused on cost reduction initiatives that allowed us to reduce the cost of our products
and increase gross profit through purchasing and manufacturing efficiencies during the
fiscal year. Favorable customer and product mix, as well as a decrease in the amortization
of purchased and core technology as certain intangibles were fully amortized, also
contributed to this increase. We expect to continue to focus on gross margin as we
implement our global strategy of consolidation and production centers to drive more
efficiency improvements and enhance customer service. |
|
|
|
Operating Expenses Decreased as a Percentage of Net Sales in Fiscal 2011 from Fiscal
2010. Operating expenses were $89.6 million or 43.9% of net sales in fiscal 2011 versus
$82.3 million or 45.0% of net sales in fiscal 2010. The increase in total operating
expenses was largely compensation-related and resulted from a net increase in headcount of
43 people as well as higher non-sales incentive compensation expenses. We also invested in
our iDigi® cloud-based platform during fiscal 2011 as we worked to evolve our business
model. Despite these increases, operating expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased
during fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010. |
29
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
Net Income in Fiscal 2011 was $11.0 Million. Our net income increased by $2.1 million
to $11.0 million in fiscal 2011, or 23.2%, over net income of $8.9 million in fiscal 2010.
We leveraged the increase in net sales, combined with cost reduction initiatives and lower
operating expenses as a percent of net sales to improve our profitability. |
|
|
|
Our Balance Sheet and Cash from Operations are Strong. Our current ratio was 8.3 to 1
in fiscal 2011 compared to 6.7 to 1 in fiscal 2010. Cash from operations was $21.8 million
in fiscal 2011 compared to $16.1 million in fiscal 2010. |
We accomplished a number of key initiatives in fiscal 2011 and also faced significant challenges
relative to our business.
Accomplishments
|
|
|
We increased revenue and earnings per diluted share in fiscal 2011 compared to the prior
fiscal year and maintained a strong balance sheet and cash flows which we believe provides
a solid foundation for growing our business. |
|
|
|
We reduced our manufacturing costs for future periods by consolidating our Breisach,
Germany operations with our U.S. production facility. |
|
|
|
We invested significantly in the development of the iDigi® Device Cloud platform and
enhanced our capability to develop customized software applications that leverage iDigi®,
which expands our ability to provide end-to-end solutions to our customers. We finished
fiscal 2011 with over 3,500 companies using the iDigi® Device Cloud. |
Challenges
|
|
|
The global economic environment was volatile in fiscal 2011. We monitor our bookings,
backlog and anticipated shipments on a weekly basis which allows us to stay abreast of
rapidly changing economic conditions as we forecast our revenue. |
|
|
|
The strengthening of foreign currencies, particularly the Euro and the British Pound,
created net foreign currency losses due to balances held abroad in non-functional
currencies such as the U.S. dollar. We put in place natural hedging and other strategies to
minimize this exposure. |
|
|
|
Since certain of our components and other materials are purchased from regions
susceptible to natural disasters as most recently seen in Japan and Thailand, we faced
challenges in procuring certain components and other materials used in manufacturing. We
believe the impact to our business in fiscal 2011 from the Japan natural disaster was
minimal, and we addressed this primarily through the purchase of additional safety stock
for component parts normally sourced from that region. As previously announced, the recent
flooding in Thailand has affected the operations of one of our contract manufacturers and
this will impact our operations and financial results during fiscal 2012. |
30
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
We believe we are approaching the inflection point in the wireless M2M market, and that
we are uniquely positioned for growth as we are able to provide customers with complete
networking solutions. The development of a cloud-based platform is a critical component of
our overall solution and go-to-market strategy, and we focused significant human capital
and financial resources on this initiative, while also managing our other strategic
objectives. |
In order to continue to improve our financial and operational performance, address the growth of
our business and meet our goal of becoming the leading global provider of wireless M2M networking
products and end-to-end solutions, we believe we must focus on the following key priorities:
|
|
|
Continue delivery of products and solutions to the following four vertical markets that
we believe promise extensive growth opportunities: energy, fleet, medical and tank; |
|
|
|
Enhance our capacity to develop software applications and our iDigi® cloud-based
platform and migrate our sales and marketing efforts towards end-to-end solutions as
opposed to sales of hardware products alone; and |
|
|
|
Further expand our strategic relationships with leading equipment manufacturers,
application providers and systems integrators. |
31
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected information from our Consolidated Statements of Operations,
expressed as a percentage of net sales and as a percentage of change from year-to-year for the
years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
compared |
|
|
compared |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
to 2010 |
|
|
to 2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
204,160 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of
purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
|
|
94,702 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
86,266 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
80,470 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
106,588 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
92,209 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
81,265 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
39,549 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
18,206 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
17,889 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
132.9 |
|
|
|
(124.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
89,551 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
82,256 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
78,195 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
17,037 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
224.2 |
|
Total other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(192.2 |
) |
|
|
(53.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
16,515 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
145.7 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
248.3 |
|
|
|
693.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,019 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
119.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
Net sales were $204.2 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $182.5 million in fiscal 2010, an increase
of $21.7 million or 11.8%, primarily due to a $26.6 million increase in the net sales of modules,
cellular products, engineering design services, serial servers, chips and iDigi® services. This
was partially offset by a $4.9 million decrease in net sales of serial cards, USB devices, wireless
communication adaptors and satellite-related products. The increase in net sales in fiscal 2011
compared to fiscal 2010 is primarily driven by increased unit volume as a result of increased
customer sales, many of which were wireless and in our targeted vertical markets. We did not
experience a material change in revenue due to pricing during fiscal 2011.
Net sales were $182.5 million in fiscal 2010 compared to $165.9 million in fiscal 2009, an increase
of $16.6 million or 10.0%, primarily due to an increase of $21.9 million in the net sales of
modules, cellular products, serial servers, wireless communication adaptors, USB products,
engineering design services and satellite-related products. This was partially offset by a
decrease of $5.3 million in net sales due to large sales of a discontinued chip set in fiscal 2009.
The increase in net sales in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 is primarily driven by increased
volume. We did not experience a material change in revenue due to pricing during fiscal 2010.
Fluctuation in foreign currency rates compared to the prior years rates had a favorable impact on
net sales of $0.9 million in fiscal 2011 and unfavorable impacts on net sales of $0.3 million and
$5.9 million in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
32
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
Net Sales by Product Category
The following table presents our revenue by embedded and non-embedded categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-embedded |
|
$ |
108.5 |
|
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
|
$ |
91.2 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
Embedded |
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
204.2 |
|
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Embedded
Non-embedded products net sales increased $8.4 million, or 8.3%, in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal
2010 due primarily to increases in cellular products and serial servers. This was partially offset
by decreases in sales of serial cards, wireless communication adaptors and USB connected products.
USB connected products have decreased due to softening of the retail sector for retail
point-of-sale related USB applications in fiscal 2011. Increased sales to customers in the medical
and fleet vertical markets contributed to the increase in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.
Non-embedded products net sales increased $8.9 million, or 9.7%, in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009. The increase was mostly due to an increase in net sales of cellular products, serial
servers, wireless communication adaptors and USB products.
Embedded
Embedded products net sales increased $13.3 million, or 16.2%, in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal
2010 due mostly to increases of net sales of modules, engineering design services and chips.
Increased sales to customers in the medical vertical market contributed to the increase in fiscal
2011 compared to fiscal 2010.
Embedded products net sales increased $7.7 million, or 10.4%, in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009. The increase was primarily due to a $13.0 million increase in net sales of modules and
satellite-related products, partially offset by a decrease of $5.3 million primarily related to
large sales of a discontinued chip set in fiscal 2009.
Net Sales by Wireless and Wired Categories
The following table presents our revenue by wireless and wired categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Wireless |
|
$ |
84.7 |
|
|
$ |
66.4 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Wired |
|
|
119.5 |
|
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
109.7 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
66.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
204.2 |
|
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless products net sales have increased by 27.6% in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 and
18.0% in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 as a result of our continued investment and focus on
wireless M2M products and solutions. As is the trend with respect to the use of telecommunications
generally, we anticipate that our sales of wireless products will continue to grow proportionately
faster than our sales of wired products.
33
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
Net Sales by Geographic Area
Our revenue by geographic location of our customers is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
118.7 |
|
|
$ |
107.3 |
|
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
|
54.7 |
% |
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
47.7 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
Asian countries |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
204.2 |
|
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America net sales in fiscal 2011 increased $11.4 million due to an increase of $6.3
million of embedded products, of which $2.7 million is related to engineering design services, and
$5.1 million of non-embedded products. The North American sales for fiscal 2011 increased over the
prior fiscal year primarily as a result of larger customer sales, many of which were wireless and
in our targeted vertical markets. Net sales in fiscal 2010 for North America increased $16.6
million due to an increase in embedded products of $4.8 million and non-embedded products of $11.8
million.
Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) net sales increased $4.4 million in fiscal 2011 over
fiscal 2010 mostly due to large customer deals. The strengthening of the Euro and British Pound
contributed $0.7 million to the increase in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010. Net sales in EMEA
decreased $8.3 million from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 as fiscal 2009 included large sales of a
discontinued chip set and a large sale to a legacy customer.
Asian countries revenue increased by $4.3 million in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 mostly
related to Radio Frequency (RF) modules in the embedded product grouping. Revenue for the Asian
countries increased $7.1 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 due to an increase of $4.1
million for embedded products and $3.0 million for non-embedded products. Also in fiscal 2010, we
recorded a full year of net sales related to our acquisition of MobiApps compared to three months
of net sales in fiscal 2009.
Latin America revenue increased by $1.6 million in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 primarily
due to non-embedded cellular products. Revenue for Latin America increased $1.2 million in fiscal
2010 compared to fiscal 2009 due to an increase of $0.8 million for embedded products and $0.4
million for non-embedded products.
Net Sales by Distribution Channel
The following table presents our revenue by distribution channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Direct / OEM channel |
|
$ |
73.3 |
|
|
$ |
66.2 |
|
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
47.3 |
% |
Distributors channel |
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
|
116.3 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total company |
|
$ |
204.2 |
|
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales in the Direct/OEM channel increased $7.1 million, or 10.8% compared to net sales in
fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2011, net sales in the Distributors channel increased by $14.6 million,
or 12.4% compared to net sales in fiscal 2010. Increased customer sales in our targeted vertical
markets contributed to the increase in both
the Distributors channel and the Direct/OEM channel. International sales growth also contributed
to the increase in Distributors channel sales.
34
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
During fiscal 2010, net sales in the Distributors channel increased by $28.9 million, or 33%
compared to net sales in fiscal 2009. Net sales in fiscal 2010 in the Direct / OEM channel
decreased by $12.3 million, or 15.7% compared to the prior fiscal year. The increase in net sales
in the Distributors channel compared to the Direct / OEM channel primarily is due to fulfillment of
customer orders for wireless products.
Our distribution channel strategy is evolving to support the vertical markets on which were
focused as well as to support distribution of our wireless products.
GROSS PROFIT
2011 Compared to 2010
Gross profit was $106.6 million and $92.2 million in fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, an
increase of $14.4 million, or 15.6%. The gross margin for fiscal 2011 was 52.2% compared to 50.5%
in fiscal 2010. Gross margin increased 1.7 percentage points primarily due to product cost
reduction initiatives that allowed us to reduce the cost of our products and increase gross profit
through purchasing and manufacturing efficiencies during the fiscal year. Favorable customer and
product mix, as well as a decrease in the amortization of purchased and core technology as certain
intangibles were fully amortized, also contributed to the increase in gross profit during fiscal
2011. Amortization of purchased and core technology was $2.9 million or 1.4% of net sales in
fiscal 2011 as compared to $4.1 million or 2.2% of net sales in fiscal 2010.
2010 compared to 2009
Gross profit was $92.2 million and $81.3 million in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase
of $10.9 million, or 13.5%. The gross margin for fiscal 2010 was 50.5% compared to 49.0% in fiscal
2009. Gross margin increased 2.1 percentage points primarily due to a reduction of costs as a
result of the business restructuring in fiscal 2009 and other cost reduction initiatives and also
increased 0.3 percentage points related to a reduction in amortization of purchased and core
technology as some technology is fully amortized. This was partially offset by a 0.9 percentage
points decrease in gross margin due to unfavorable product mix primarily related to cellular and
certain embedded products. Amortization of purchased and core technology was $4.1 million or 2.2%
of net sales in fiscal 2010 as compared to $4.2 million or 2.5% of net sales in fiscal 2009.
OPERATING EXPENSES
2011 Compared to 2010
Operating expenses were $89.6 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $7.3 million or 8.9%, compared
to $82.3 million in fiscal 2010 mostly due to increased compensation-related expenses of $5.9
million, including salaries and incentive compensation, as we fully reinstated our non-sales
incentive program for fiscal 2011 and increased headcount by 43 employees, primarily in sales,
marketing and research and development. We also invested in our iDigi® platform during fiscal 2011
as we worked to evolve our business to include cloud-based solutions.
Sales and marketing expenses were $39.6 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $2.6 million or
6.9%, compared to $37.0 million in fiscal 2010. Sales and marketing expenses increased by $2.0
million for compensation-
related expenses due to increased headcount and full reinstatement of our non-sales incentive
program and $0.6 million for outside services, travel and entertainment and miscellaneous other
sales and marketing expenses.
35
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OPERATING EXPENSES (CONTINUED)
Research and development expenses were $31.6 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $3.8 million or
13.7%, compared to $27.8 million in fiscal 2010. Research and development expenses increased by
$2.6 million for compensation-related expenses due to increased headcount and full reinstatement of
our non-sales incentive program, $0.8 million for other research and development expenses mostly
related to the investment in our iDigi® cloud-based platform and $0.4 million for professional
services and contract labor.
General and administrative expenses were $18.2 million in fiscal 2011, an increase of $0.3 million
or 1.8%, compared to $17.9 million in fiscal 2010. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was due to increases of $1.3 million for compensation-related expenses mostly related to a
full reinstatement of our non-sales incentive program and $0.2 million related to a litigation
settlement discussed in Notes 16 and 18 to our consolidated financial statements. This partially
was offset by a reduction of $1.2 million in professional fees related to internal investigation
and remediation actions we took related to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act incurred in
fiscal 2010.
2010 Compared to 2009
Operating expenses were $82.3 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $4.1 million or 5.2%, compared
to $78.2 million in fiscal 2009. Compensation-related expenses, including salaries, incentive
compensation, commissions and stock-based compensation increased $1.8 million as we fully restored
the sales commission program and partially reinstated our non-sales incentive compensation program
for fiscal 2010. We also incurred professional fees of $1.4 million related to the internal
investigation and remediation actions we took related to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as
well as incremental ongoing expenses related to the fiscal 2009 MobiApps acquisition of $1.6
million.
Sales and marketing expenses were $37.0 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $1.7 million or
4.8%, compared to $35.3 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was due to an increase of $1.0
million in commission expense, $0.4 million in incremental expenses for MobiApps and $0.3 million
of other various sales and marketing expenses.
Research and development expenses were $27.8 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $1.4 million or
5.5%, compared to $26.4 million in fiscal 2009. The increase was due to an increase of $0.9
million in professional services, contract labor and certification testing, $0.7 million in
incremental expenses for MobiApps, and $0.4 million of compensation-related expenses, offset by a
net reduction of $0.6 million of expense primarily related to a development project that was
completed in fiscal 2009.
General and administrative expenses were $17.9 million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $3.4 million
or 22.9%, compared to $14.5 million in fiscal 2009. General and administrative expenses increased
by $2.0 million due to increased professional fees which includes $1.4 million of investigation and
remediation fees. In addition, the incremental expenses for MobiApps increased general and
administrative expenses by $0.5 million, compensation-related expenses increased by $0.3 million
and other miscellaneous general and administrative expenses increased by $0.6 million.
36
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
RESTRUCTURING
2011 Restructuring
On July 21, 2011, we announced a restructuring of our manufacturing operations in Breisach,
Germany. The restructuring reduced our manufacturing footprint by consolidating prototype and
production functions and centralizing outsourced production control in our Eden Prairie, Minnesota
production facility. The consolidation was driven by our strategy of driving efficiency
improvements and enhancing customer service globally through more centralized operations. We will
continue to maintain sales and research and development activities at the leased facility in
Breisach, Germany. As a result of these initiatives, we expect the total charge to be $0.6 million
on a pre-tax basis, which consists of $0.5 million for employee termination costs for 25 employees
and $0.1 million for asset write-downs. We recorded a charge of $0.2 million in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2011, and expect to record charges of $0.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012
and $0.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The payments are expected to be completed
in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We expect to cease manufacturing in Breisach by the end of
December 2011 and the majority of the manufacturing positions will be vacated by the end of
December 2011.
2009 Restructuring
On April 23, 2009 we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless
products and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring
included the closing of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation
and consolidation of the manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minnetonka,
Minnesota headquarters. We paid a lease cancellation fee for one of the leased facilities in
Davis and had vacated the facility as of September 30, 2009. We continue to maintain
non-manufacturing activities at the remaining leased facility in Davis, California. As a
result of these initiatives, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 we recorded a $2.0
million charge, which consisted of $1.8 million for employee termination costs for 86
positions and $0.2 million for contract termination fees and other relocation costs.
All 86 positions were vacated as of September 30, 2009. The employee termination costs
included severance and the associated costs of continued medical benefits and outplacement
services. The other restructuring expenses included contract termination fees for non-renewal
of lease terms relating to one of the facilities in Davis, California and relocation expenses
for employees.
During fiscal 2010, we recorded an additional $0.1 million for an additional six months of
continued medical benefits as a result of new healthcare legislation passed in December 2009
related to the aforementioned restructuring. Also during fiscal 2010 we reversed $0.5 million
of the restructuring accrual since costs associated with continued medical benefits and
relocation were lower than expected. During fiscal 2011, we paid a small amount of employee
termination costs and reversed the remaining restructuring accrual.
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME, NET
2011 Compared to 2010
Other (expense) income, net was $0.5 million of expense in fiscal 2011, a decrease of $1.1 million
compared to $0.6 million of income in fiscal 2010. The majority of this was due to $0.7 million of
foreign currency net transaction losses in fiscal 2011 compared to foreign currency net transaction
gains of $0.3 million in fiscal 2010. We realized interest income on marketable securities and
cash and cash equivalents of $0.3 million in fiscal 2011 compared to $0.4 million in fiscal 2010.
Our average investment balance increased from $69.0 million in fiscal 2010 to $85.9 million in
fiscal 2011, but our interest income was less than in the prior fiscal year since we earned an
average interest rate of 0.3% in fiscal 2011 compared to 0.5% in fiscal 2010.
37
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME, NET (CONTINUED)
2010 Compared to 2009
Total other income, net was $0.6 million in fiscal 2010, a decrease of $0.6 million compared to
$1.2 million in fiscal 2009. We realized interest income on marketable securities and cash and
cash equivalents of $0.4 million in fiscal 2010 compared to $1.4 million in fiscal 2009. Although
our average investment balance during fiscal 2010 was $69.0 million compared to $57.6 million in
fiscal 2009, the decrease in interest income was primarily due to a lower than average interest
rate as we earned an average interest rate of 0.5% during fiscal 2010 compared to 2.4% during
fiscal 2009. Interest expense was $0.1 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to $0.3 million in
fiscal 2009 as we made one of the deferred payments during fiscal 2010 for the Spectrum
acquisition. Other income, net also increased $0.3 million related to a net increase in foreign
currency transaction gains in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009.
INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was 33.3%, 15.0% and 4.6% for fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Our effective tax rate will vary based on a variety of factors, including overall
profitability, the geographical mix of income before taxes and related statutory tax rate in each
jurisdiction, and discrete events, such as settlements of audits.
During fiscal 2011, we recorded a tax benefit of $0.7 million primarily related to the release of
income tax reserves due to the expiration of the statutes of limitations from various
jurisdictions, primarily foreign. The enactment of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance
Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 provided for the extension of the research and
development tax credit that allowed us to record a benefit for tax credits earned during the last
three quarters of fiscal 2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The aforementioned income tax
benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other discrete tax benefits reduced
our effective tax rate by 4 percentage points in fiscal 2011.
During fiscal 2010, we reversed $2.3 million in income tax reserves associated primarily with the
closing of prior tax years through statute expiration and the conclusion of a federal tax audit.
While the statutes of limitations have not expired, U.S. federal income tax returns for the periods
ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 have been audited by and settled with the Internal
Revenue Service. The aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax
reserves and other discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 22 percentage points in
fiscal 2010.
During fiscal 2009, we reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and settlement of prior liabilities
under amnesty programs. We recorded an additional current discrete tax benefit of $0.5 million
resulting from the enactment on October 3, 2008 of the retroactive extension of the research and
development tax credit for activity from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008. We also recorded
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2007 and 2008. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 27 percentage points in fiscal 2009.
38
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On October 26, 2011, we announced that the flooding in Thailand has impacted the operations of our
contract manufacturer located near Bangkok, Thailand. The main manufacturing facility is currently
closed, although efforts are underway to restore operations at the contract manufacturers back-up
facility, which has not
currently been impacted by flooding and is also located in Bangkok. In addition, we are working on
reallocating production normally done in Thailand to our U.S. manufacturing facility, as well as
other contract manufacturers we currently use. We presently anticipate that the Thailand flooding
and the resulting impact on our subcontract manufacturer in Thailand will decrease revenue in a
range of approximately $2 million to $6 million for the first fiscal quarter of 2012, and gross
margin will decrease by approximately two percentage points in the first fiscal quarter of 2012.
We expect that the impact of the Thailand flooding for the full fiscal year 2012 will have a
minimal impact on revenue, and the impact to gross margin will be approximately one percentage
point. We expect that earnings per diluted share for fiscal 2012 will be reduced by approximately $0.07 due to
the revenue and gross margin impact previously described.
INFLATION
Management believes that during fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, inflation has not had a material
effect on our operations or on our consolidated financial position.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our operations principally with funds generated from operations. We held cash,
cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $106.2 million, $87.6 million and $70.7
million at September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our working capital was $142.7
million, $122.1 million and $106.1 million at September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Absent a disruption in our business, we expect our working capital to continue to increase.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow Highlights (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
21,839 |
|
|
$ |
16,095 |
|
|
$ |
15,686 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(22,399 |
) |
|
|
(15,167 |
) |
|
|
25,286 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
(5,427 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
|
$ |
2,509 |
|
|
$ |
34,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $21.8 million during fiscal 2011 compared
to $16.1 million in fiscal 2010, a net increase of $5.7 million. This net increase was due to
an increase in net income of $2.1 million, deferred income taxes of $2.4 million, inventory
obsolescence of $1.1 million, net increases in working capital of $1.0 million and other
non-cash items of $0.4 million. This was offset by net decreases in amortization expense of
$1.3 million. Changes in working capital increased cash flows by $1.0 million due to a $3.8
million increase in accounts receivable as the increase in accounts receivable in fiscal 2011
was less than the increase in fiscal 2010 and a $1.5 million increase in inventories as
inventories have declined in fiscal 2011. This was offset by a $2.7 million net decrease in
accounts payable and $1.6 million in other assets and accrued expenses.
39
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
Net cash provided by operating activities was $16.1 million during fiscal 2010 compared to
$15.7 million during fiscal 2009, a net increase of $0.4 million. This net increase is due to
an increase in net income of $4.9 million and a net increase of $0.2 million of other non-cash
items, offset by a decrease of $1.0 million for changes in deferred income tax benefits and a
$3.7 million decrease due to changes in working capital. Changes in working capital decreased
cash flows by $3.7 million primarily due to an $11.9 million decrease in accounts receivable
as the receivables balance increased due to higher revenue in September 2010 than in September
2009. Inventory levels were approximately the same at September 30, 2010 and 2009, however
inventories decreased $3.6 million at September 30, 2009 compared to 2008. This was offset by
a net increase of $6.0 million related to changes in accounts payable and a net increase of
$5.8 million related to changes in other assets and accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities was $22.4 million in fiscal 2011 as compared to $15.2 million
in fiscal 2010, a net increase of $7.2 million. We used an additional $7.4 million of cash for net
purchases of marketable securities in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010, offset by $0.2 million
fewer capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010.
Net cash used by investing activities was $15.2 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to net cash
provided by investing activities of $25.3 million during fiscal 2009, a net decrease of $40.5
million. Net purchases of marketable securities in fiscal 2010 offset by net settlements of
marketable securities in fiscal 2009 resulted in a net decrease of $41.3 million. We used cash of
$3.0 million for a deferred payment related to the Spectrum acquisition in fiscal 2010. In fiscal
2009 we spent $3.0 million related to the acquisition of the assets of MobiApps and reduced our
capital expenditures by $0.8 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $4.6 million in fiscal 2011 as compared to $2.6
million in fiscal 2010, an increase of $2.0 million, resulting from additional exercises of stock
options and employee stock purchase plan transactions.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $2.6 million in fiscal 2010 as compared to net cash
used in financing activities of $5.4 million in fiscal 2009, a net increase of $8.0 million. We
spent $6.6 million related to treasury stock repurchases in fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2010 compared
to fiscal 2009, we received an additional $1.1 million in proceeds from the exercise of stock
options and employee stock purchase plan transactions and spent $0.3 million less in capital lease
payments.
We expect positive cash flows from operations and believe that our current cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities balances, cash generated from operations and our ability to secure debt
and/or equity financing will be sufficient to fund our business operations and capital expenditures
for the next twelve months and beyond.
The following summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by fiscal period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
7,563 |
|
|
$ |
2,759 |
|
|
$ |
3,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
The operating lease agreements included above primarily relate to office space. The table above
does not include possible payments for uncertain tax positions. Our reserve for uncertain tax
positions, including accrued interest and penalties, was $2.6 million as of September 30, 2011.
Due to the nature of the underlying liabilities and the extended time often needed to resolve
income tax uncertainties, we cannot make reliable estimates of the amount or timing of future cash
payments that may be required to settle these liabilities.
The above table also does not include our obligation for royalties under a license agreement that
we entered into September 30, 2011 as a result of the patent litigation settlement with MOSAID
Technologies Incorporated. The royalties are calculated based on future sales of licensed products
identified in the settlement agreement and we cannot make reliable estimates of the amount of cash
payments.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions being
denominated in Euros, British Pounds, Japanese Yen and Indian Rupees and foreign currency
translation risk as the financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy
to reduce foreign currency risk.
During 2011, we had approximately $85.5 million of net sales related to foreign customers including
export sales, of which $28.8 million was denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro
and British Pound. During both 2010 and 2009, we had approximately $75.2 million of net sales to
foreign customers including export sales, of which $27.6 million and $33.4 million, respectively,
were denominated in foreign currency, predominantly the Euro and British Pound. In future periods,
we expect a significant portion of sales will continue to be made in Euros and British Pounds.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment.
This guidance provides an update on how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. This revised
guidance allows companies an option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of
goodwill impairment. Under the revised guidance, a company is permitted to first assess
qualitative factors to determine whether goodwill impairment exists prior to performing analyses
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. If, based on the qualitative
assessment, a company concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting
unit exceeds its carrying value, quantitative testing for impairment is not necessary. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We have elected to early adopt this update to be
effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011 and we do not expect that the adoption of
this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This guidance eliminates the option to report other
comprehensive income and its components in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity.
Rather it requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders equity be presented in either a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
This guidance also requires us to present on the face of the financial statements any
reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net
income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance beginning with
our fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no effect on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations, as it will only impact how certain
information related to other comprehensive income is presented in our consolidated financial
statements.
41
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS (CONTINUED)
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements
(Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in
U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This guidance changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements
in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements
to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This guidance is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance beginning with our fiscal quarter
ending March 31, 2012. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities and the values of purchased assets and assumed liabilities in acquisitions. We
base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies impact our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of embedded and non-embedded products to our
distributors and Direct (end-user) / OEM customers, and to a small extent from the sale of
professional and engineering services, fees associated with technical support, training, software
licenses and royalties. We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is
reasonably assured and there are no post-delivery obligations other than warranty.
Under these criteria, product revenue is generally is recognized upon shipment of product to
customers, including Direct (end-user)/OEM and distributors. Sales to authorized domestic
distributors and Direct / OEMs are made with certain rights of return and price adjustment
provisions. Estimated reserves for future returns and pricing adjustments are established by us
based on an analysis of historical patterns of returns and price adjustments as well as an analysis
of authorized returns compared to received returns, current on-hand inventory at distributors, and
distribution sales for the current period. Estimated reserves for future returns and price
adjustments are charged against revenues in the same period as the corresponding sales are
recorded. Material differences between the historical trends used to determine estimated reserves
and actual returns and pricing adjustments could result in a material change to our consolidated
results of operations or financial position. We have applied consistent methodologies for
estimating reserves for future returns and pricing adjustments for all
years presented. The reserve for future returns and pricing adjustments was $1.3 million at
September 30, 2011 and $1.1 million at September 30, 2010.
42
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
Our non-product revenue represented 4.5%, 3.3% and 3.0% of net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The majority of the non-product revenue was from professional and engineering
services and represented 4.2%, 2.9% and 2.7% of net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We also had revenue from cloud-based services, post-contract customer support, fees
associated with technical support, training, royalties and the sale of software licenses. Our
software development tools and development boards often include multiple elements, including
hardware, software licenses, post-contract customer support, limited training and basic hardware
design review. Our customers purchase these products and services during their product development
process in which they use the tools to build network connectivity into the devices they are
manufacturing. Revenue for professional and engineering services and training is recognized upon
performance. Revenue from software licenses is recognized when earned. Revenues from contracts
with multiple element arrangements are recognized as each element is earned based on the relative
fair value of each element provided the delivered elements have value to customers on a standalone
basis. Amounts allocated to each element are based on its vendor specific objective evidence, such
as the sales price for the product or service when it is sold separately. Revenue from cloud-based
services is earned in two ways: a) web-based management fees are considered to be earned on a
monthly basis consistent with a monthly contractual commitment, and b) transaction fees that are
billed to the customer at the larger of the minimum price or the number of transactions times the
stated fee and are considered earned as the transactions occur.
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
We regularly monitor and evaluate the realizable value of our marketable securities. When
assessing marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider several
factors. These factors include: how significant the decline in value is as a percentage of the
original cost, how long the market value of the investment has been less than its original cost,
the underlying factors contributing to a decline in the prices of securities in a single asset
class, the performance of the issuers stock price in relation to the stock price of its
competitors within the industry, expected market volatility, analyst recommendations, the views of
external investment managers, any news or financial information that has been released specific to
the investee and the outlook for the overall industry in which the issuer operates. If events and
circumstances indicate that a decline in the value of these securities has occurred and is
other-than-temporary, we would record a charge to other income (expense).
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, which reflects the estimate of losses that may
result from the inability of some of our customers to make required payments. The estimate for the
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on known circumstances regarding collectability of
customer accounts and historical collections experience. If the financial condition of one or more
of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required. Material differences between the historical trends used to estimate
the allowance for doubtful accounts and actual collection experience could result in a material
change to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. The allowance for doubtful
accounts was $0.3 million at September 30, 2011 and $0.5 million at September 30, 2010.
43
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. We reduce the carrying value of our inventories for estimated excess
and obsolete inventories equal to
the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated realizable value based upon
assumptions about future product demand and market conditions. Once the new cost basis is
established, the value is not increased with any changes in circumstances that would indicate an
increase in value after the remeasurement. If actual product demand or market conditions are less
favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required that
could result in a material change to our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
We have applied consistent methodologies for the net realizable value of inventories.
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. At June 30, 2011, our market capitalization
exceeded the carrying value of our reporting unit by 28.6%; therefore, there was no indication of
goodwill impairment. There were no triggering events to indicate goodwill impairment at September 30, 2011.
INCOME TAXES
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income, and other complex issues, may require an extended period of time to
resolve and could result in adjustments to our income tax balances that are material to our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
We have unrecognized tax benefits of $2.6 million classified as a long-term liability as we do not
expect significant payments to occur over the next 12 months. The total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits that if recognized would affect our effective tax rate is $2.0 million. We recognize
interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
WARRANTIES
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from one to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to repair or replace products we deem defective due to material or
workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is
recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the
estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty
incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty accrual.
The product warranty accrual was $0.9 million at both September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
44
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We do not use
derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate risk.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions being
denominated in Euros, British Pounds, Japanese Yen or Indian Rupees and foreign currency
translation risk as the financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy,
although we employ natural hedging of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies to
reduce our foreign currency risk.
The table below compares the average monthly exchange rates of the Euro, British Pound, Japanese
Yen and Indian Rupee to the U.S. Dollar:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve months ended September 30, |
|
|
% increase |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(decrease) |
|
Euro |
|
|
1.3955 |
|
|
|
1.3574 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
British Pound |
|
|
1.6064 |
|
|
|
1.5596 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Japanese Yen |
|
|
0.0123 |
|
|
|
0.0112 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Indian Rupee |
|
|
0.0221 |
|
|
|
0.0217 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
A 10.0% change from the 2011 average exchange rate for the Euro, British Pound, Yen and Rupee
to the U.S. Dollar would have resulted in a 1.4% increase or decrease in annual net sales and a
2.0% increase or decrease in stockholders equity. The above analysis does not take into
consideration any pricing adjustments we may make in response to changes in the exchange rate.
CREDIT RISK
We have some exposure to credit risk related to our accounts receivable portfolio. Exposure to
credit risk is controlled through regular monitoring of customer financial status, credit limits
and collaboration with sales management on customer contacts to facilitate payment.
Investments are made in accordance with our investment policy and consist of certificates of
deposit, commercial paper, money market funds, corporate bonds and government municipal bonds. We
may have some credit exposure related to the fair value of our securities, which could change based
on changes in market conditions. If market conditions deteriorate or, if these securities
experience credit rating downgrades, we may incur impairment charges for securities in our
investment portfolio. We also may have credit exposure should there be further market disruptions
resulting from U.S. Federal Government credit downgrades.
45
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Digi International Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of operations, of cash flows and of stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss)
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Digi International Inc. and its
subsidiaries at September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2011 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our
opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to
express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
46
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 23, 2011
47
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
204,160 |
|
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
|
|
94,702 |
|
|
|
86,266 |
|
|
|
80,470 |
|
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
4,073 |
|
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
106,588 |
|
|
|
92,209 |
|
|
|
81,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
39,549 |
|
|
|
37,010 |
|
|
|
35,304 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
31,642 |
|
|
|
27,825 |
|
|
|
26,381 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
18,206 |
|
|
|
17,889 |
|
|
|
14,557 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
89,551 |
|
|
|
82,256 |
|
|
|
78,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
17,037 |
|
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
Other (expense) income |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
16,515 |
|
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, basic |
|
|
25,312 |
|
|
|
24,865 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, diluted |
|
|
25,819 |
|
|
|
25,154 |
|
|
|
25,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
48
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
54,684 |
|
|
$ |
50,943 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
51,524 |
|
|
|
36,634 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
26,433 |
|
|
|
24,090 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
23,986 |
|
|
|
26,550 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
3,344 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
162,234 |
|
|
|
143,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, long-term |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net |
|
|
15,370 |
|
|
|
16,396 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
|
14,360 |
|
|
|
19,851 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
86,012 |
|
|
|
86,210 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Other |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
283,895 |
|
|
$ |
266,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,492 |
|
|
$ |
7,449 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
7,758 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
Deferred payment on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,236 |
|
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
19,486 |
|
|
|
21,597 |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
23,179 |
|
|
|
26,409 |
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Notes 15 & 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
29,100,577 and 28,666,311 shares issued |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
194,580 |
|
|
|
185,427 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
102,668 |
|
|
|
91,649 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(10,457 |
) |
|
|
(9,589 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,471,930 and 3,584,215 shares |
|
|
(26,366 |
) |
|
|
(27,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
260,716 |
|
|
|
240,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
283,895 |
|
|
$ |
266,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
49
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, equipment and improvements |
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
6,171 |
|
|
|
7,484 |
|
|
|
7,476 |
|
Bad debt/product return provision (benefit), net |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
Inventory obsolescence |
|
|
1,935 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(796 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(3,656 |
) |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
Restructuring |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,756 |
) |
|
|
(6,525 |
) |
|
|
5,384 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
2,695 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
(4,561 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
3,187 |
|
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
21,839 |
|
|
$ |
16,095 |
|
|
$ |
15,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(61,506 |
) |
|
|
(38,538 |
) |
|
|
(30,489 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
44,843 |
|
|
|
29,335 |
|
|
|
62,624 |
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired, including deferred payments |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,986 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Purchase of property, equipment, improvements and certain
other intangible assets |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(2,975 |
) |
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(22,399 |
) |
|
|
(15,167 |
) |
|
|
25,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Proceeds from stock option plan transactions |
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan transactions |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
(5,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
34,258 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
50,943 |
|
|
|
48,434 |
|
|
|
14,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
54,684 |
|
|
$ |
50,943 |
|
|
$ |
48,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
Income taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
7,065 |
|
|
$ |
6,479 |
|
|
$ |
3,944 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
50
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED) |
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
For the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
28,336 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
$ |
(22,691 |
) |
|
$ |
177,614 |
|
|
$ |
78,625 |
|
|
$ |
(1,897 |
) |
|
$ |
231,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
Net unrealized (loss) gain on
investments
(net of related tax effect of $2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Reclassification of gain into net income
(net of related tax effect of $3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
28,409 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
$ |
(28,161 |
) |
|
$ |
181,282 |
|
|
$ |
82,708 |
|
|
$ |
(6,527 |
) |
|
$ |
229,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,941 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,074 |
) |
|
|
(3,074 |
) |
Net unrealized (loss) gain on
investments
(net of related tax effect of ($22)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Reclassification of gain into net income
(net of related tax effect of $14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894 |
|
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2010 |
|
|
28,666 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
|
3,584 |
|
|
$ |
(27,218 |
) |
|
$ |
185,427 |
|
|
$ |
91,649 |
|
|
$ |
(9,589 |
) |
|
$ |
240,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,019 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
(770 |
) |
Net unrealized (loss) gain on
investments
(net of related tax effect of $66) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
Reclassification of loss into net income
(net of related tax effect of ($4)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990 |
|
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
29,101 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
$ |
(26,366 |
) |
|
$ |
194,580 |
|
|
$ |
102,668 |
|
|
$ |
(10,457 |
) |
|
$ |
260,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BUSINESS DESCRIPTION
We are a leading provider of machine to machine (M2M) networking products and solutions that enable
the connection, monitoring and control of local or remote physical assets by electronic means. Our
products are deployed by a wide range of businesses and institutions. We focus a significant
amount of our development, sales and marketing efforts on four vertical markets that represent
significant opportunities to expand our business: energy monitoring and management, fleet vehicle
tracking, medical monitoring and reporting and storage tank monitoring and control.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents consist of money market accounts and other highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due
to the short maturities of these investments.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds
and government municipal bonds. All marketable securities are accounted for as
available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as
a separate component of stockholders equity. We obtain quoted market prices and trading
activity for each security, where available, review the financial solvency of each security
issuer and obtain other relevant information to estimate the fair value for each security in
our investment portfolio.
We regularly monitor and evaluate the value of our marketable securities. When assessing
marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider several factors.
These factors include: how significant the decline in value is as a percentage of the original
cost, how long the market value of the investment has been less than its original cost, the
underlying factors contributing to a decline in the prices of securities in a single asset class,
the performance of the issuers stock price in relation to the stock price of its competitors
within the industry, expected market volatility, analyst recommendations, the views of external
investment managers, any news or financial information that has been released specific to the
investee and the outlook for the overall industry in which the issuer operates. If events and
circumstances indicate that a decline in the value of a security has occurred and is
other-than-temporary, we would record a charge to other income (expense).
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect, which is net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. The following factors are considered when determining the collectability of
specific customer accounts: customer creditworthiness, past transaction history with the customer,
and changes in customer payment terms or practices. In addition, overall historical collection
experience, current economic industry trends, and a review
of the current status of trade accounts receivable are considered when determining the required
allowance for doubtful accounts. Based on our assessment, we provide for estimated uncollectible
amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to our allowance for doubtful accounts. Balances
that remain outstanding after we have used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a
charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to accounts receivable.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. Appropriate consideration is given to deterioration, obsolescence and
other factors in evaluating fair market value.
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS, NET
Property, equipment and improvements are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided by charges to operations using the straight-line method over the estimated
asset useful lives. Furniture and fixtures and other equipment are depreciated over a period of
three to seven years. Building improvements and buildings are depreciated over ten and thirty-nine
years, respectively. Equipment under capital lease is depreciated over the lesser of the lease
term or its depreciable life.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while major
renewals and betterments are capitalized. The assets and related accumulated depreciation accounts
are adjusted for asset retirements and disposals with the resulting gain or loss included in
operations.
IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Purchased proven technology, license agreements, covenants not to compete and other identifiable
intangible assets are recorded at fair value when acquired in a business acquisition, or at cost
when not purchased in a business acquisition. Purchased in-process research and development costs
(IPR&D) were previously expensed upon consummation of the related business acquisition. Effective
October 1, 2009 in-process research and development costs are capitalized according to
authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to business combinations. Since this new guidance
was effective, we have not completed any acquisitions. All other identifiable intangible assets
are amortized on either a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three to
thirteen years or based on the pattern in which the asset is consumed. Useful lives for
identifiable intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based on the periods of
time from which we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable intangible assets. Amortization
of purchased and core technology is presented as a separate component of cost of sales in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization of all other acquired identifiable intangible
assets is charged to operating expense as a component of general and administrative expense.
Identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment annually, at a minimum, or whenever
events or circumstances indicate that undiscounted expected future cash flows are not sufficient to
recover the carrying value amount. We measure impairment loss by utilizing an undiscounted cash
flow valuation technique using fair values indicated by the income approach. Impairment losses, if
any, would be recorded in the period the impairment is identified. No impairments were identified
during fiscal years 2011, 2010 or 2009.
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. At June 30, 2011, our market capitalization
exceeded the carrying value of our reporting unit by 28.6%; therefore, there was no indication of
goodwill impairment. There were no triggering events to indicate goodwill impairment at September 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2010, our market capitalization was below the carrying value of our reporting unit.
However, our market capitalization plus our estimated control premium of 35% resulted in a fair
value in excess of our carrying value and therefore no impairment was indicated. In order for our
carrying value to equal fair value, we would have required approximately a 14% control premium. At
September 30, 2010, our market capitalization, which is an indicator of fair value, continued to be
below the carrying value of our reporting unit; however, including the control premium there
continued to be no indication of goodwill impairment at September 30, 2010. In order for our
carrying value to equal fair value, we would have required approximately a 1% control premium. The
control premium represents the amount an investor would pay over and above market capitalization in
order to obtain a controlling interest in a company. The estimated control premium was determined
by a review of premiums paid for similar companies over the past five years.
The control premium used in our annual goodwill assessment at June 30, 2010 and our further
evaluation of goodwill at September 30, 2010 was based on a control premium study that was
performed in fiscal 2009, resulting in a range of control premium of 25 percent to 35 percent. We
concluded that the high end of the range of control premiums best represented the amount an
investor would pay, over and above market capitalization, in order to obtain a controlling interest
given the economic conditions at that time. Based on our industry knowledge and discussions with
an independent third party valuation firm in June 2010, we concluded that the control premium study
performed in the previous year remained valid and the 35 percent control premium continued to apply
to our fiscal 2010 annual goodwill assessment. In order to compute the above control premium,
three methodologies were used, including (1) analyzing individual transactions within our industry,
(2) analyzing industry-wide data, and (3) analyzing global transaction data. Individual
transactions in the Communication Equipment and Computer & Peripherals industries were used to find
transactions of target companies that operated in similar markets and shared similar operating
characteristics with Digi. Transaction screening criteria included selection of transactions with
the following characteristics:
|
|
|
At least 50 percent of a target companys equity sought by an acquirer, |
|
|
|
Target company considered operating (not in bankruptcy), |
|
|
|
Target company had publicly traded stock outstanding at the transaction date, and |
|
|
|
Transactions announced between June 30, 2006 and the valuation date. |
In analyzing industry-wide data, transactions in three industries were identified that encompassed
the products offered by us: Office Equipment and Computer Hardware, Communications, and Computer,
Supplies and Services. Finally, control premiums were considered for both domestic and
international transactions.
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
GOODWILL (CONTINUED)
We have defined the criteria that will result in additional interim goodwill impairment
testing. If these criteria are met, we will undertake an analysis to determine whether a
goodwill impairment has occurred, which could have a material effect on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations. The evaluation of asset impairment may require
us to make assumptions about future cash flows and revenues. These assumptions require
significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed or estimated amounts. If
these estimates and assumptions change, we may be required to recognize impairment losses in
the future.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to revenue
recognition.
Revenue recognized for product sales was 95.5%, 96.7% and 97.0% in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably
assured and there are no post-delivery obligations, other than warranty. Under these criteria,
product revenue generally is recognized upon shipment of product to customers, including Direct
(end-user) / OEMs and distributors. Sales to authorized domestic distributors and Direct / OEMs
are made with certain rights of return and price adjustment provisions. Estimated reserves for
future returns and pricing adjustments are established by us based on an analysis of historical
patterns of returns and price adjustments as well as an analysis of authorized returns compared to
received returns, current on-hand inventory at distributors, and distribution sales for the current
period. Estimated reserves for future returns and price adjustments are charged against revenues
in the same period as the corresponding sales are recorded.
Our
non-product revenue represented 4.5%, 3.3% and 3.0% of net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The majority of the non-product revenue was from professional and engineering
services and represented 4.2%, 2.9% and 2.7% of net sales in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We also had revenue from cloud-based services, post-contract customer support, fees
associated with technical support, training, royalties and the sale of software licenses. Our
software development tools and development boards often include multiple elements, including
hardware, software licenses, post-contract customer support, limited training and basic hardware
design review. Our customers purchase these products and services during their product development
process in which they use the tools to build network connectivity into the devices they are
manufacturing. Revenue for professional and engineering services and training is recognized upon
performance. Revenue from software licenses is recognized when earned. Revenues from contracts
with multiple element arrangements are recognized as each element is earned based on the relative
fair value of each element provided the delivered elements have value to customers on a standalone
basis. Amounts allocated to each element are based on its vendor specific objective evidence, such
as the sales price for the product or service when it is sold separately. Revenue from cloud-based
services is earned in two ways: a) web-based management fees are considered to be earned on a
monthly basis consistent with a monthly contractual commitment, and b) transaction fees that are
billed to the customer at the larger of the minimum price or the number of transactions times the
stated fee and are considered earned as the transactions occur.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. Research and development costs include
compensation, allocation of corporate costs, depreciation, utilities, professional services and
prototypes. Software development costs are expensed as incurred until the point that technological
feasibility and proven marketability of the product are established. To date, the time period
between the establishment of technological feasibility and completion of software development has
been short, and no significant development costs have been incurred during that period.
Accordingly, we have not capitalized any software development costs to date.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year
end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. Income tax expense is equal to the tax payable
for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities and also
changes in income tax reserves.
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during
the period. Our only potentially dilutive common shares are those that result from dilutive common
stock options and shares purchased through the employee stock purchase plan.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the net income per
common share calculations (in thousands, except per common share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common
share weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
25,312 |
|
|
|
24,865 |
|
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per common
share adjusted weighted average shares |
|
|
25,819 |
|
|
|
25,154 |
|
|
|
25,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the treasury stock method to calculate the weighted-average shares used in the diluted
earnings per share computation. Under the treasury stock method, the proceeds from exercise of an
option, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that we have not yet
recognized, and the amount of estimated tax
benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when the option is exercised are
assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period.
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Stock options to purchase 1,831,713, 2,493,261 and 3,109,829 common shares at September 30, 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common
share because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common
shares and, therefore, their effect would be antidilutive.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost of employee services received in exchange
for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. This cost
must be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide the service
(usually the vesting period).
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Financial position and results of operations of our international subsidiaries are measured using
local currencies as the functional currency, except for our Singapore location which uses the U.S.
Dollar as its local currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated at the
exchange rates in effect at the end of each reporting period. Statements of operations accounts
are translated at the weighted average rates of exchange prevailing during each reporting period.
Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing currency exchange rates from period to
period are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders equity.
Gains and losses on foreign currency exchange transactions, as well as translation gains or losses
on transactions denominated in currencies other than an entitys functional currency are reflected
in the statement of operations. Net transaction gains and losses are recorded to other income
(expense) and amounted to expense of $0.7 million in fiscal 2011 and income of $0.3 million and
$0.1 million for fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. We have not implemented a formal hedging
strategy, although we employ natural hedging of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies to reduce our foreign currency risk.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Our comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income, foreign currency translation
adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, which are
charged or credited to the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account in stockholders
equity.
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment.
This guidance provides an update on how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. This revised
guidance allows companies an option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of
goodwill impairment. Under the revised guidance, a company is permitted to first assess
qualitative factors to determine whether goodwill impairment exists prior to performing analyses
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. If, based on the qualitative
assessment, a company concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting
unit exceeds its carrying value, quantitative testing for impairment is not necessary. This
guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. We have elected to early adopt this update to be
effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011 and we do not expect that the adoption of
this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This guidance eliminates the option to report other
comprehensive income and its components in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity.
Rather it requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders equity be presented in either a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
This guidance also requires us to present on the face of the financial statements any
reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net
income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance beginning with our fiscal quarter
ending December 31, 2012. The adoption of this guidance will have no effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations, as it will only impact how certain information related
to other comprehensive income is presented in our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements
(Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in
U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This guidance changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements
in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements
to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This guidance is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this guidance beginning with our fiscal quarter
ending March 31, 2012. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
2. ACQUISITIONS
MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
On June 8, 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
(MobiApps), a developer of machine-to-machine (M2M) communications technology focusing on
satellite, cellular, and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps has locations in India,
Singapore and in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreements, we acquired the
U.S. assets located in Herndon, Virginia. In addition, we established Digi Wireless Singapore Pte.
Ltd. and Digi m2m Solutions India Private Limited, which acquired the assets of MobiApps affiliate
companies, located in Singapore and India, respectively. The acquisition was a cash transaction
for $3.0 million. At September 30, 2010, it was determined that certain performance milestones
were not achieved; therefore the contingent payment of $0.5 million was not payable.
We have determined that the MobiApps acquisition is not material to our consolidated results of
operations or financial position. Therefore, pro forma financial information is not presented.
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc.
On July 23, 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Digi International Inc. Prior to the acquisition, Spectrum was a privately held
Minneapolis-based corporation and performed wireless design services. The acquisition was a cash
merger for $10.0 million of which $4.0 million was paid on the acquisition date, $3.0 million was
paid in January 2010, and the remaining $3.0 million was paid in July 2011.
We determined that the Spectrum acquisition was not material to our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition. Therefore, pro forma financial information is not presented.
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Identifiable Intangible Assets, net
Amortized identifiable intangible assets, net as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 are comprised of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011 |
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Purchased and core technology |
|
$ |
46,412 |
|
|
$ |
(41,716 |
) |
|
$ |
4,696 |
|
|
$ |
46,484 |
|
|
$ |
(38,917 |
) |
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
License agreements |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
(2,610 |
) |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
|
10,341 |
|
|
|
(7,505 |
) |
|
|
2,836 |
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
(6,522 |
) |
|
|
3,231 |
|
Customer maintenance contracts |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(674 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
17,437 |
|
|
|
(10,865 |
) |
|
|
6,572 |
|
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
(9,096 |
) |
|
|
8,385 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
(770 |
) |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78,766 |
|
|
$ |
(64,406 |
) |
|
$ |
14,360 |
|
|
$ |
78,297 |
|
|
$ |
(58,446 |
) |
|
$ |
19,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Total |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
6,171 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
7,484 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
7,476 |
|
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Total |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
4,594 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
3,527 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
2016 |
|
$ |
658 |
|
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET (CONTINUED)
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance, October 1 |
|
$ |
86,210 |
|
|
$ |
86,558 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, September 30 |
|
$ |
86,012 |
|
|
$ |
86,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
We have a single operating and reporting segment. Our revenues consist of products that are in
non-embedded and embedded product categories. Non-embedded products are connected externally to a
device or larger system to provide wired or wireless network connectivity or port expansion, while
embedded products are used by a product developer to build an electronic device in which the
product provides processing power, wired Ethernet, or wireless network connectivity to that device.
The products included in the non-embedded product category include cellular products, wireless
communication adapters, console and serial servers, USB connected products and serial cards. The
products included in the embedded product category include modules, single-board computers, chips,
software and development tools, design services and satellite communication products.
The following table provides revenue by product categories (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Non-embedded |
|
$ |
108,435 |
|
|
$ |
100,146 |
|
|
$ |
91,262 |
|
Embedded |
|
|
95,725 |
|
|
|
82,402 |
|
|
|
74,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
204,160 |
|
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information in the following table provides revenue by the geographic location of the
customer for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
118,654 |
|
|
$ |
107,347 |
|
|
$ |
90,708 |
|
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
|
|
52,125 |
|
|
|
47,698 |
|
|
|
56,018 |
|
Asia countries |
|
|
26,939 |
|
|
|
22,742 |
|
|
|
15,578 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
6,442 |
|
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
204,160 |
|
|
$ |
182,548 |
|
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS (CONTINUED)
Net property, equipment and improvements by geographic location are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
14,169 |
|
|
$ |
15,015 |
|
|
$ |
15,324 |
|
International, primarily Europe |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net property, equipment and
improvements |
|
$ |
15,370 |
|
|
$ |
16,396 |
|
|
$ |
16,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.S. export sales comprised 37.5%, 34.1% and 32.5% of net sales for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We had one customer whose accounts receivable balance comprised 10.2% of total accounts receivable
at September 30, 2009 for which multiple payments were in transit and received within three
business days of September 30, 2009. No single customer exceeded 10% of accounts receivable or
sales for any other period presented.
5. SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, (in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
26,772 |
|
|
$ |
24,639 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,433 |
|
|
$ |
24,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
18,960 |
|
|
$ |
21,678 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,986 |
|
|
$ |
26,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
10,522 |
|
|
|
10,522 |
|
Improvements |
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
13,753 |
|
|
|
12,625 |
|
Purchased software |
|
|
11,801 |
|
|
|
11,157 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
3,035 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,827 |
|
|
|
42,894 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,457 |
|
|
|
26,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,370 |
|
|
$ |
16,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Our marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate bonds and
government municipal bonds.
We analyze our available-for-sale marketable securities for impairment on an ongoing basis. We
consider factors such as the length of time and extent to which the securities have been in an
unrealized loss position and the trend of any unrealized losses. We also consider whether an
unrealized loss is a temporary loss or an other-than-temporary loss such as: (a) whether we have
the intent to sell the security, (b) whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to
sell the security before its anticipated recovery, or (c) permanent impairment due to bankruptcy or
insolvency.
In order to estimate the fair value for each security in our investment portfolio, where available,
we obtain quoted market prices and trading activity for each security. We also review the
financial solvency of each security issuer and obtain other relevant information from our
investment advisor. As of September 30, 2011, 54 of our securities were trading below our
amortized cost basis. We determined each decline in value to be temporary based upon the above
described factors. We expect to realize the fair value of these securities, plus accrued interest,
either at the time of maturity or when the security is sold. All of our current holdings are
classified as available-for-sale marketable securities and are recorded at fair value on our
consolidated balance sheet with the unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss.
Our marketable securities at September 30, 2011 were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses (2) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
22,694 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(144 |
) |
|
$ |
22,568 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
4,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4,995 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
8,766 |
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
15,200 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
15,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable securities |
|
|
51,667 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
51,524 |
|
Non-current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
53,280 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(174 |
) |
|
$ |
53,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $478. |
|
(2) |
|
The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2011
was $43,755. |
Our marketable securities at September 30, 2010 were comprised of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses (2) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
26,163 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
26,161 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
5,463 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable
securities |
|
$ |
36,627 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
36,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $451. |
|
(2) |
|
The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2010
was $18,909. |
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. This
standard also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value. This standard
maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring
that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market
participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from
independent sources. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based upon the best information
available in the circumstances. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The hierarchy is broken down into the following three levels:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that
are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and their fair values are
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar
techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
Level 3 also may include certain investment securities for which there is limited market
activity or a decrease in the observability of market pricing for the investments, such
that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. |
Fair value is applied to financial assets such as our marketable securities, which are classified
and accounted for as available-for-sale. These items are stated at fair value at each reporting
period using the above guidance.
The following tables provide information by level for financial assets that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011 Using: |
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
Quoted price in |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
value at |
|
|
active markets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
30,474 |
|
|
$ |
30,474 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
24,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
4,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
8,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
15,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
83,601 |
|
|
$ |
30,474 |
|
|
$ |
53,127 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 using: |
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
Quoted price in |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
value at |
|
|
active markets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
29,416 |
|
|
$ |
29,416 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
26,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
66,050 |
|
|
$ |
29,416 |
|
|
$ |
36,634 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents are measured at fair value using quoted market prices in active markets for
identical assets. We value our Level 2 assets using inputs that are based on market indices of
similar assets within an active market. There were no transfers in to or out of our Level 2
financial assets during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011.
We have no financial assets valued with Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2011 nor have we
purchased or sold any Level 3 financial assets during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011.
The use of different assumptions, applying different judgment to matters that are inherently
subjective and changes in future market conditions could result in different estimates of fair
value of our securities, currently and in the future. If market conditions deteriorate, we may
incur impairment charges for securities in our investment portfolio.
8. PRODUCT WARRANTY OBLIGATION
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from one to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to repair or replace products we deem defective with regard to
material or workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related
revenue is recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied
to the estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical
warranty incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty
accrual. The following table summarizes the activity associated with the product warranty accrual
for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
Balance at |
|
|
Warranties |
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
Balance at |
|
year |
|
October 1, |
|
|
issued |
|
|
made |
|
|
September 30, |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
(821 |
) |
|
$ |
941 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
(831 |
) |
|
$ |
877 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
(856 |
) |
|
$ |
970 |
|
We are not responsible and do not warrant that customer software versions created by original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers based upon our software source code will function in a
particular way, conform
to any specifications, or are fit for any particular purpose and we do not indemnify these
customers from any third-party liability as it relates to or arises from any customization or
modifications made by the OEM customer.
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. RESTRUCTURING
2011 Restructuring
On July 21, 2011, we announced a restructuring of our manufacturing operations in Breisach,
Germany. The restructuring reduced our manufacturing footprint by consolidating prototype and
production functions and centralizing outsourced production control in our Eden Prairie, Minnesota
production facility. The consolidation was driven by our strategy of driving efficiency
improvements and enhancing customer service globally through more centralized operations. We will
continue to maintain sales and research and development activities at the leased facility in
Breisach, Germany. As a result of these initiatives, we expect the total charge to be $0.6 million
on a pre-tax basis, which consists of $0.5 million for employee termination costs for 25 employees
and $0.1 million for asset write-downs. We recorded a charge of $0.2 million in the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2011, and expect to record charges of $0.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012
and $0.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. The payments are expected to be completed
in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We expect to cease manufacturing in Breisach by the end of
December 2011 and the majority of the manufacturing positions will be vacated by the end of
December 2011.
A summary of the restructuring charges and other activity within the restructuring accrual is
listed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Costs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
$ |
148 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
Foreign currency fluctutation |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Restructuring
On April 23, 2009, we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless products
and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring included the closing
of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation and consolidation of the
manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minnetonka, Minnesota headquarters. We paid a
lease cancellation fee for one of the leased facilities in Davis and had vacated the facility as of
the end of fiscal 2009. We continue to maintain non-manufacturing activities at the remaining
leased facility in Davis, California. As a result of these initiatives, during the third quarter
of fiscal 2009 we recorded a $2.0 million charge, which consisted of $1.8 million for employee
termination costs for 86 positions and $0.2 million for contract termination fees and other
relocation costs.
All of the 86 positions were vacated in fiscal 2009. The employee termination costs included
severance and the associated costs of continued medical benefits and outplacement services. The
other restructuring expenses included contract termination fees for non-renewal of lease terms
relating to one of the facilities in Davis, California and relocation expenses for employees.
65
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. RESTRUCTURING (RESTRUCTURING)
A summary of the restructuring charges and other activity within the restructuring accrual is
listed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination Costs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
Reversal |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Reversal |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2010, we recorded an additional $0.1 million for an additional six months
of continued medical benefits as a result of new healthcare legislation passed in December
2009 related to the aforementioned restructuring. Also during fiscal 2010 we reversed $0.5
million of the restructuring accrual since costs associated with continued medical benefits
and relocation were lower than expected. During fiscal 2011, we paid a small amount of
employee termination costs and reversed the remaining restructuring accrual.
10. INCOME TAXES
The components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
10,173 |
|
|
$ |
7,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
International |
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,515 |
|
|
$ |
10,519 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the income tax provision are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
State |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(3,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,829 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The net deferred tax asset at September 30 consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
2,610 |
|
|
$ |
3,344 |
|
Non-current deferred tax asset |
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
Current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Non-current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
5,431 |
|
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncollectible accounts and other reserves |
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
Compensation costs |
|
|
6,106 |
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
(5,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
5,431 |
|
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, we have tax credit carryforwards in a foreign jurisdiction of $0.2
million, the majority of which will expire in 2015.
We have concluded that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized
based on future projected taxable income and the anticipated future reversal of deferred tax
liabilities. The amount of the deferred tax assets actually realized, however, could vary if there
are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or
changes in the amounts of future taxable income. If our future taxable income projections are not
realized, a valuation allowance may be required, and would be reflected as income tax expense at
the time that any such change in future taxable income is determined. Our valuation allowance as
of September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively. During the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded an additional valuation allowance of $0.3 million for our India
and Singapore subsidiaries net operating losses, based on a lack of historical earnings and an
uncertainty about future taxable income.
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to our effective income tax rate for
the years ended September 30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Statutory income tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefits |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Utilization of tax credits |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
Manufacturing deduction |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
Foreign tax rate differential |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Research and development credit related to prior years |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
Adjustment of tax contingency reserves |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
Foreign true-up to return |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Domestic true-up to return |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Non-deductible stock-based compensation |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Valuation reserve |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
All of our unrecognized tax benefits are classified as a long-term liability as we do not expect
significant payments or receipts to occur over the next 12 months. A reconciliation of the
beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of fiscal year |
|
$ |
2,265 |
|
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
Increases related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year income tax positions |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Current year income tax positions |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
Decreases related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,740 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Expiration of the statute of limitations |
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of fiscal year |
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
|
$ |
2,265 |
|
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would affect the effective
tax rate is $2.0 million.
We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. During
fiscal years 2011 and 2010 we recorded an immaterial benefit and in fiscal year 2009 we recorded an
immaterial expense for interest and penalties related to income tax matters in the provision for
income taxes. As of both September 30, 2011 and 2010 we have accrued interest and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.6 million included in long-term income taxes payable on
our consolidated balance sheet.
We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly decrease over the next 12 months due to the lapse of the applicable foreign statute
of limitations. We estimate the range of this change to be between $0.2 million and $0.4 million
in taxes, penalties and interest.
During fiscal 2011, we recorded a tax benefit of $0.7 million primarily related to the release of
income tax reserves due to the expiration of the statutes of limitations from various
jurisdictions, primarily foreign. The enactment of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance
Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 provided for the extension of the research and
development tax credit that allowed us to record a benefit for tax credits earned during the last
three quarters of fiscal 2010 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The aforementioned income tax
benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other discrete tax benefits reduced
our effective tax rate by 4 percentage points in fiscal 2011.
During fiscal 2010, we reversed $2.3 million in income tax reserves associated primarily with the
closing of prior tax years through statute expiration and the conclusion of a federal tax audit.
While the statutes of limitations have not expired, U.S. federal income tax returns for the periods
ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008 have been audited by and settled with the Internal
Revenue Service. The aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax
reserves and other discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 22 percentage points in
fiscal 2010.
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
During fiscal 2009, we reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and settlement of prior liabilities
under amnesty programs. We recorded an additional current discrete tax benefit of $0.5 million
resulting from the enactment on October 3, 2008 of the retroactive extension of the research and
development tax credit for activity from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008. We also recorded
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2007 and 2008. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 27 percentage points in fiscal 2009.
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income, and other complex issues, may require an extended period of time to
resolve and may result in adjustments to our income tax balances in those years that are material
to our consolidated financial position and results of operations. We are no longer subject to
income tax examination for taxable years prior to fiscal 2009 and 2007 in the case of U.S. federal
and non-U.S. income tax authorities, respectively, and for tax years generally before fiscal 2007,
in the case of state taxing authorities, consisting primarily of Minnesota and California.
At September 30, 2011, we have approximately $11.9 million of accumulated undistributed earnings of
controlled foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely as of such date
pursuant to authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
and corporate joint ventures. Accordingly, no deferred tax has been provided on such earnings. If
the applicable earnings were remitted to us, the earnings would be taxed at the U.S. federal tax
rate.
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based awards are granted under the terms of the 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan as amended and
restated as of December 4, 2009 (the Omnibus Plan), as well as our Stock Option Plan as amended and
restated as of November 27, 2006 (the Stock Option Plan) and Non-Officer Stock Option Plan as
amended and restated as of November 27, 2006 (the Non-Officer Plan), both of which expired during
the first quarter of fiscal 2007 (the Plans). Additional awards cannot be made under the Stock
Option Plan or the Non-Officer Plan. The authority to grant options under the Omnibus Plan and set
other terms and conditions rests with the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Stock Option Plan and the Non-Officer Plan include non-statutory stock options (NSOs) and the
Stock Option Plan also includes incentive stock options (ISOs) to employees and others who provide
services to us, including consultants, advisers and directors. Options granted under these plans
generally vest over a four year service period and will expire if unexercised after ten years from
the date of grant. Share awards vest upon continued employment. The exercise price for ISOs and
non-employee director options granted under the Stock Option Plan was set at the fair market value
of our common stock based on the closing price on the date of grant. The exercise price for NSOs
granted under the Stock Option Plan or the Non-Officer Plan was set by the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors and was set to the exercise price based on the closing price on the date
of grant.
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
The Omnibus Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 5,750,000 common shares in connection with awards
of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance units or stock awards.
Eligible participants include our employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors.
Awards may be granted under the Omnibus Plan until December 4, 2019 as an authorization to issue an
additional 2,500,000 common shares was ratified on January 25, 2010 at the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Options under the Omnibus Plan can be granted as either ISOs or NSOs. The exercise
price shall be determined by our Compensation Committee but shall not be less than the fair market
value of our common stock based on the closing price on the date of grant.
We recorded cash received from the exercise of stock options of $2.9 million, $1.7 million and $0.4
million during fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation were $0.8 million during fiscal 2011 and immaterial during fiscal years
2010 and 2009. Upon exercise, we issue new shares of stock. The Plans have provisions allowing
employees to elect to pay their withholding obligation through share reduction. No employees
elected to pay income tax withholding obligations through share reduction during fiscal years 2011,
2010 or 2009.
Also, we sponsor an Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended and restated as of December 4, 2009 and
November 27, 2006 (the Purchase Plan), covering all domestic employees with at least 90 days of
continuous service and who are customarily employed at least 20 hours per week. The Purchase Plan
allows eligible participants the right to purchase common stock on a quarterly basis at the lower
of 85% of the market price at the beginning or end of each three-month offering period. The
Purchase Plan was ratified on January 25, 2010 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to increase
the number of shares reserved for future purchases to the Purchase Plan by 250,000 shares bringing
the total number of shares to 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock that may be purchased under the
plan. Employee contributions to the Purchase Plan were $1.0 million in the fiscal year ending
2011, $0.9 million in fiscal 2010 and $1.0 million in the fiscal year ended 2009. Pursuant to the
Purchase Plan, 112,285, 124,087, and 145,316 common shares were issued to employees during the
fiscal years ended 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Shares are issued under the Purchase Plan
from treasury stock. As of September 30, 2011, 315,157 common shares were available for future
issuances under the Purchase Plan.
Stock-based compensation expense is included in the consolidated results of operations as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation before income taxes |
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation after income taxes |
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
2,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory was immaterial as of September
30, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
70
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
A summary of options and common shares reserved for grant under the Plans and Assumed Plans are as
follows (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
for Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,537 |
|
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
$ |
10.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
(1,196 |
) |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
8.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
6,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on our
closing stock price of $11.00 as of September 30, 2011, which would have been received by the
option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. |
The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock
exceeds its exercise price. The total intrinsic value of all options exercised during each of the
twelve months ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2.4 million, $0.6 million and $0.2
million, respectively.
The table below shows the weighted average fair value, which was determined based upon the fair
value of each option on the grant date utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the
related assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fair value of options granted (in thousands) |
|
$ |
4,948 |
|
|
$ |
3,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
Weighted average per option grant date fair value |
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
Assumptions used for option grants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
1.58% 2.14 |
% |
|
|
1.86% 2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.57% 2.41 |
% |
Expected term |
|
5.25 years |
|
|
4.5 5 years |
|
|
4.5 5 years |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
41% 44 |
% |
|
|
43% 45 |
% |
|
|
41% 45 |
% |
Weighted average volatility |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
The fair value of each option award granted during the periods presented was estimated using
the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the table above.
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of our stock. We use historical data
to estimate option exercise and employee termination information within the valuation model;
separate groups of grantees that have similar historical exercise behaviors are considered
separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the
vesting period and historical information and represents the period of time that options granted
are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate used is the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond rate
in effect at the time of the grant whose maturity equals the expected term of the option.
71
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
A summary of our non-vested options as of September 30, 2011 and changes during the twelve months
then ended is presented below (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Fair Value per |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Common Share |
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeiture rates. The pre-vesting forfeiture
rate used in fiscal 2011 was 2.0%. As of September 30, 2011 the total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements, net of expected forfeitures, was
$5.8 million and the related weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is
approximately 2.8 years.
At September 30, 2011, the weighted average exercise price and remaining life of the stock options
are as follows (in thousands, except remaining life and exercise price):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
Range of |
|
Options |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Average |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
( In Years) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$2.19 $8.00 |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
$ |
6.03 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
$ |
6.02 |
|
$8.01 $9.00 |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
7.67 |
|
|
$ |
8.22 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
$ |
8.26 |
|
$9.01 $10.00 |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.69 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
$10.01 $11.00 |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
$ |
10.67 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
$ |
10.61 |
|
$11.01 $13.00 |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
|
|
$ |
12.47 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
$ |
12.52 |
|
$13.01 $15.00 |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
$ |
13.96 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
$ |
13.87 |
|
$15.01 $16.88 |
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
$ |
15.29 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
$ |
15.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.19 $16.88 |
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
$ |
10.70 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of shares vested was $3.7 million in fiscal 2011, $2.9 million in fiscal
2010 and $3.2 million in fiscal 2009.
12. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE
On July 23, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized an additional 500,000 shares of our common
stock for repurchase under our previously announced stock repurchase program bringing the total
number of shares authorized to 1,500,000 shares. During fiscal 2008, we began to repurchase our
common stock and purchased 471,200 shares for $5.1 million. During fiscal 2009, we purchased an
additional 893,162 shares for $6.6
million. We did not repurchase any of our stock during fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2011. As of
September 30, 2011, 135,638 shares remain available for repurchase.
72
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
13. SHARE RIGHTS PLAN
Under our share rights plan, each right entitles its holder to buy one one-hundredth of a share of
a Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $60, subject to adjustment.
The rights are not exercisable until a specified distribution date as defined in the Share Rights
Agreement. The Rights will expire on June 30, 2018, unless extended or earlier redeemed or
exchanged by us as defined in the Share Rights Agreement.
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We currently have a savings and profit sharing plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the Code), whereby eligible employees may contribute up to 25% of their pre-tax
earnings, not to exceed amounts allowed under the Code.
We provide a match of 100% on the first 3% of each employees bi-weekly contribution and a 50%
match on the next 2% of each employees bi-weekly contribution. In addition, we may make
contributions to the plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. We provided
matching contributions of $1.3 million, $1.1 million and $1.2 million in the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
15. COMMITMENTS
We have entered into various operating lease agreements for office facilities and equipment, the
last of which expires in fiscal 2017. The office facility leases generally require us to pay a
pro-rata share of the lessors operating expenses. Certain operating leases contain escalation
clauses and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The following schedule reflects future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating
leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
2,759 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,977 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,232 |
|
2015 |
|
|
898 |
|
2016 |
|
|
555 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments required |
|
$ |
7,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following schedule shows the composition of total rental expense for all operating leases
for the years ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Rentals |
|
$ |
3,275 |
|
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
Less: sublease rentals |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,258 |
|
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. CONTINGENCIES
Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the initial
public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other public
companies. We acquired NetSilicon on February 13, 2002. The complaint names us as a defendant
along with NetSilicon, certain of its officers and certain underwriters involved in NetSilicons
IPO, among numerous others, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO prospectus and
registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained material
misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters in
allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the claims
against the NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation vigorously.
Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed from the
lawsuit, without prejudice, on October 9, 2002.
As previously disclosed, the parties advised the District Court on February 25, 2009 that they had
reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation in its entirety. A stipulation of
settlement was filed with the District Court on April 2, 2009. On June 9, 2009, the District Court
preliminarily approved the proposed global settlement. Notice was provided to the class, and a
settlement fairness hearing, at which members of the class had an opportunity to object to the
proposed settlement, was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued
an order granting final approval to the settlement. Ten appeals initially were filed objecting to
the definition of the settlement class and fairness of the settlement. Five of those appeals were
dismissed with prejudice on October 6, 2010. On May 17, 2011, the Court of Appeals dismissed four
of the remaining appeals and remanded the final appeal to the District Court to determine whether
the appellant has standing to object to the settlement. On August 25, 2011, the District Court
ruled that the last remaining objector lacks standing to object to the settlement. That objector
has appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals, and the plaintiffs have moved to dismiss that
appeal.
Under the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us,
and we would bear no financial liability beyond our deductible of $250,000 per claim. While there
can be no guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our
liability insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the
applicable deductible per claim. As of September 30, 2011, we have an accrued liability for the
anticipated settlement of $300,000, which we believe is adequate and reflects the amount of loss
that is probable, and a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000. This $50,000
represents the anticipated settlement of $300,000 less our $250,000 deductible. In the event we
should have losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, the losses could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
Patent Infringement Lawsuits
On March 16, 2011, MOSAID Technologies Incorporated filed a complaint naming us as defendants in
federal court in the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint included allegations against us and
32 other companies pertaining to the infringement of six patents by products compliant with various
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standards for implementing wireless local area
network computer communications in certain frequency bands. On September 30, 2011 we reached a
settlement involving a royalty-bearing license agreement for future sales of licensed products sold
during the term of the agreement. We do not expect this license agreement to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
On January 18, 2011, Advanced Processor Technologies LLC filed a complaint naming us as a
defendant in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint included
allegations against us and eight other companies pertaining to the infringement of two patents
by products containing data processors with
memory management units. On October 17, 2011, we settled the lawsuit for $0.2 million which
was recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 (see Note 18 to our consolidated
financial statements).
74
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
On May 11, 2010, SIPCO, LLC filed a complaint naming us as a defendant in federal court in the
Eastern District of Texas. This claim subsequently has been moved to the Northern District of
Georgia. The complaint included allegations against us and five other companies pertaining to the
infringement of SIPCOs patents by wireless mesh networking and multi-port networking products.
The complaint seeks monetary and non-monetary relief. We cannot predict the outcome of these
matters or estimate a range of loss at this time or whether it will have a materially adverse
impact on our business prospects and our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or
cash flow.
In addition to the matters discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims. Our
management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
17. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
48,334 |
|
|
$ |
49,716 |
|
|
$ |
54,274 |
|
|
$ |
51,836 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
24,666 |
|
|
|
25,651 |
|
|
|
28,755 |
|
|
|
27,516 |
|
Net income (1)(2) |
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
3,615 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
42,968 |
|
|
$ |
45,076 |
|
|
$ |
47,238 |
|
|
$ |
47,266 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21,713 |
|
|
|
22,748 |
|
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
|
24,030 |
|
Net income (1)(2)(3) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2011 and 2010, we recorded discrete income tax benefits of $0.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively. We recorded
$0.6 million in the first quarter and $0.1 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 resulting from the reversal of previously
established income tax reserves from various jurisdictions, primarily foreign, for the expiration of statute of limitations and from
the enactment of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 providing for the
extension of the research and development tax credit. Discrete income tax benefits for fiscal 2010 were recorded of
$0.1 million in the first quarter and $2.2 million in the third quarter related to the reversal of tax reserves primarily due to the
closure of prior tax years through statute expiration and audit. |
|
(2) |
|
We reversed a business restructuring accrual of $0.1 million ($0.0 million after tax) in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and
recorded a restructuring charge of $0.2 million ($0.1 million after tax) during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. We reversed
a business restructuring accrual of $0.4 million ($0.2 million after tax) in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and $0.1 million
($0.1 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
We incurred investigation expenses of $1.1 million ($0.7 million after tax) in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and $0.3 million
($0.2 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. |
75
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 17, 2011, we settled the lawsuit with Advanced Processor Technologies LLC, who filed a
patent infringement lawsuit against us in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas on January
18, 2011. The lawsuit included allegations against Digi and eight other companies pertaining to
the infringement of two patents by products containing data processors with memory management
units. The settlement amounted to $0.2 million which was recorded during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2011 in general and administrative expense.
On October 26, 2011, we announced that the flooding in Thailand has impacted the operations of our
contract manufacturer located near Bangkok, Thailand. The main manufacturing facility is currently
closed, although efforts are underway to restore operations at the contract manufacturers back-up
facility, which has not currently been impacted by flooding and is also located in Bangkok. In
addition, we are working on reallocating production normally done in Thailand to our U.S.
manufacturing facility, as well as other contract manufacturers we currently use.
76
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and acting principal
financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this
evaluation, the principal executive officer and acting principal financial officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,
2011 using the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment,
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
September 30, 2011. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in Item 8 of this report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with
the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None
77
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information appearing under the headings Proposal
No. 1 Election of Directors and Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders and Management
in our Proxy Statement for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders we
will file with the SEC (the Proxy Statement).
Executive Officers of the Registrant
As of the date of filing this Form 10-K, the following individuals were executive officers of the
Registrant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
|
Position |
Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven E. Snyder
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence A. Kraft
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joel K. Young
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of Research and Development
and Chief Technical Officer |
Mr. Dunsmore joined our company in October 1999 as President and Chief Executive Officer and a
member of the Board of Directors and was elected Chairman of the Board in May 2000. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Dunsmore was Vice President of Access for Lucent Microelectronics, a
telecommunications company now known as Agere Systems Inc., since June 1999. From October 1998 to
June 1999, he acted as an independent consultant to various high technology companies. From
February 1998 to October 1998, Mr. Dunsmore was Chief Executive Officer of NetFax, Inc., a
telecommunications company. From October 1995 to February 1998, he held executive management
positions at US Robotics and then at 3COM after 3COM acquired US Robotics in June 1997. Prior to
that, Mr. Dunsmore held various marketing management positions at AT&T Paradyne Corporation from
May 1983 to October 1995. Mr. Dunsmore is also a director of Analysts International Corporation.
Mr. Snyder joined our company in November 2010 as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Snyder most recently served as Chief Financial Officer at
Gearworks, Inc. from November 2008 to September 2009. In August 2009, Gearworks, Inc. merged with
Xora, Inc. From January 2003 to June 2008, he served as an officer at Xiotech Corporation, a
privately held data storage company. He served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
manufacturing from his hiring in October 2007 and as the General Manager of the storage solutions
group from October 2007 to June 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Snyder served as Chief Financial Officer
at several companies, including Ancor Communications, Inc., then a publicly traded developer and
manufacturer of fiber channel switching products for data center networks which was acquired by
QLogic Corporation in 2000. Mr. Snyder also spent ten years at Cray Research, Inc. in
progressively responsible financial roles. Earlier roles include seven years in various financial
positions at Control Data Corporation and two years with KPMG Peat Marwick.
Mr. Kraft joined our company as Vice President of Americas Sales and Marketing in February 2003 and
was named Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing in November 2005. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Kraft was Vice President of Marketing for Advanced Switching Communications (ASC),
a provider of broadband access platforms, from June 1999 to February 2002. From July 1998 to
October 1998, Mr. Kraft was Vice President of Marketing for NetFax, Inc., a telecommunications
company. Mr. Kraft also previously held
the positions of Manager of Product Marketing at 3COM/U.S. Robotics, Vice President of Marketing
for ISDN Systems Corporation, and Group Products Manager for the Internet access program at Sprint
Corporation.
78
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (CONTINUED) |
Mr. Young joined our company in July 2000 as Vice President of Engineering and was named Vice
President of Research and Development and Chief Technical Officer in November 2005. In October
2006, Mr. Young was named Senior Vice President of Research and Development and Chief Technical
Officer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Young served as a Vice President for Transcrypt International, a
provider of encryption products, in various engineering, sales and marketing positions from
February 1996 to June 2000. Before that, he held various engineering and management positions at
AT&T and AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1986 to 1996.
Code of Ethics
We have in place a code of ethics within the meaning of Rule 406 of Regulation S-K, which is
applicable to our senior financial management, including specifically our principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and controller. A copy of this code of ethics is included as
an exhibit to this report. We intend to satisfy our disclosure obligations regarding any amendment
to, or a waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our website
at www.digi.com. We also have a code of conduct that applies to all directors, officers and
employees, a copy of which is available through our website (www.digi.com) under the About us
Investor Relations Corporate Governance caption.
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information appearing under the heading
Compensation of Directors, Executive Compensation, the information regarding compensation
committee interlocks and insider participation under the heading Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors on our Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information appearing under the headings Security
Ownership of Principal Stockholders and Management and Equity Compensation Plan Information in
our Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information regarding director independence under
the heading Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors and the information regarding related person
transactions under the heading Related Person Transaction Approval Policy on our Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
Incorporated into this item by reference is the information under Proposal No. 4 Ratification
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in our Proxy Statement.
79
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
|
(a) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules of the Company (filed as part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K) |
|
1. |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2011, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011, 2010
and 2009 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
2. |
|
Schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
3. |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2(a) |
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2008 among Digi
International Limited, a subsidiary of Digi International Inc.,
and all of the shareholders of Sarian Systems Limited (excluding
schedules and exhibits which the Registrant agrees to furnish
supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request) (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
3(a) |
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
3(b) |
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
4(a) |
|
|
Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the
Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
4(b) |
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations,
Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Shares (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(a) |
|
|
English Language Summary of Sale and Leaseback Agreement dated
February 18, 2008 between Digi International GmbH and Deutsche
Structured Finance GmbH & Co. Alphard KG (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(b) |
|
|
Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated
as of November 27, 2006* (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(b)(i) |
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (for
grants under Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan)* (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(c) |
|
|
Digi International Inc. Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, as Amended
and Restated as of November 27, 2006 (9) |
80
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(d) |
|
|
Digi International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated
as of December 4, 2009* (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e) |
|
|
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of
December 4, 2009* (11) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)(i) |
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (for grants under
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan before
January 26, 2010)* (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)(ii)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement (amended form for
grants under Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan on or after
January 26, 2010 provided Addendum 1A applies only to certain
grants made on and after November 22, 2011).* |
|
|
|
|
|
10(f) |
|
|
Form
of indemnification agreement with directors and officers of the
Company* (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(g) |
|
|
Agreement
between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft, dated February 4,
2003* (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(g)(i) |
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft dated July 30,
2007* (15) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(h) |
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Joseph T. Dunsmore dated September
27, 2006* (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(i) |
|
|
Agreement
between the Company and Joel K. Young dated July 30, 2007* (17) |
|
|
|
|
|
10(j) |
|
|
Offer Letter Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2010 between the Company and
Steven E. Snyder* (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Powers of Attorney |
|
|
|
|
|
31(a) |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
31(b) |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit
to this Form 10-K. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 1993 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Companys Form 8-K dated January 18, 2011 (File
no. 1-34033). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed on April 25, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A
filed on April 25, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
81
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED) |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 8-K dated September 13, 2004
(File no. 0-17972). |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2010 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2010 (File no. 1-34033). |
82
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, on November 29, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on
November 29, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Steven E. Snyder
|
|
|
|
Steven E. Snyder |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
*
|
|
|
|
Guy C. Jackson |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
*
|
|
|
|
Kenneth E. Millard |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
*
|
|
|
|
Ahmed Nawaz |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
*
|
|
|
|
William N. Priesmeyer |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
*
|
|
|
|
Bradley J. Williams |
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this document on behalf of
each of the above named directors of the Registrant pursuant to Powers of Attorney duly
executed by such persons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
|
Attorney-in-fact |
|
83
Schedule
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
(Decrease) to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
beginning |
|
|
costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
end of |
|
Description |
|
of period |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
period |
|
|
|
|
Valuation account doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
114 |
(1) |
|
$ |
339 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
(1) |
|
$ |
549 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
72 |
(1) |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
|
|
Reserve for future returns and pricing adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
|
$ |
5,156 |
|
|
$ |
4,982 |
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
4,916 |
|
|
$ |
4,868 |
|
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,067 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollectible accounts charged against allowance, net of recoveries |
84
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Method of Filing |
2(a)
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2008 among Digi International Limited, a subsidiary of Digi International Inc., and all of the shareholders of Sarian Systems Limited
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4(a)
|
|
Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4(b)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
English Language Summary of Sale and Leaseback Agreement dated February 18, 2008 between Digi International GmbH and Deutsche Structured Finance GmbH & Co. Alphard KG
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated as of November 27, 2006
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(b)(i)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, as Amended and Restated as of November 27, 2006
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(d)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated as of December 4, 2009
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)
|
|
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan, as amended and restated as of December 4, 2009
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)(i)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)(ii)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
10(f)
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement with directors and officers of the Company
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(g)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft, dated February 4, 2003
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(g)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft dated July 30, 2007
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(h)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Joseph T. Dunsmore dated September 27, 2006
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
85
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Method of Filing |
10(i)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Joel K. Young dated July 30, 2007
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(j)
|
|
Offer Letter Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2010 between the Company and Steven E. Snyder
|
|
Incorporation by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
Electronically |
86