sv4za
As filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 14, 2011
Registration No. 333-177187
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
ARISTOTLE HOLDING,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
5912
|
|
45-2884094
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
c/o Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
St. Louis, Missouri
63121
(314) 996-0900
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Keith J. Ebling, Esq.
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
St. Louis, Missouri
63121
(314) 996-0900
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Lou R. Kling
Howard L. Ellin
Kenneth M. Wolff
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Four Times Square
New York, New York 10036
(212) 735-3000
|
|
Thomas M. Moriarty, General
Counsel, Secretary and
President, Global
Pharmaceutical Strategies
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
(201) 269-3400
|
|
James C. Morphy
Matthew G. Hurd
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
(212) 558-4000
|
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable
after this Registration Statement becomes effective and upon
completion of the mergers described in the enclosed joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such dates as
the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
Information
contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These
securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted
prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective.
This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of any offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of
these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer,
solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or
qualification under the securities laws of any such
jurisdiction.
|
PRELIMINARY SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION DATED NOVEMBER 14, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts, Inc.
|
|
|
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. AND MEDCO HEALTH
SOLUTIONS, INC.
MERGER PROPOSAL YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
November 14,
2011
Dear Stockholders:
Express Scripts, Inc. (Express Scripts) and Medco
Health Solutions, Inc. (Medco) have entered into a
merger agreement providing for the combination of Express
Scripts and Medco under a new holding company named Aristotle
Holding, Inc. The mergers will combine the expertise of two
complementary pharmacy benefit managers to accelerate efforts to
lower the cost of prescription drugs and improve the quality of
care for Americans. George Paz will serve as chairman and CEO of
the combined organization. The board of directors of the
combined company will consist of the current members of the
board of directors of Express Scripts and two current
independent Medco board members.
Upon completion of the mergers, Express Scripts stockholders
will receive one share of common stock of Aristotle Holding,
Inc. for each share of Express Scripts common stock. For each
share of Medco common stock, Medco stockholders will receive
(i) $28.80 in cash, without interest, and
(ii) 0.81 shares of common stock of Aristotle Holding,
Inc. We anticipate that Express Scripts stockholders will hold
approximately 59%, and Medco stockholders will hold
approximately 41%, of the shares of Aristotle Holding,
Inc.s common stock issued and outstanding immediately
after the consummation of the mergers. Aristotle Holding, Inc.
intends to apply to list its common stock on the NASDAQ under
the symbol ESRX, subject to official notice of
issuance and, following consummation of the mergers, we
anticipate that Aristotle Holding, Inc. will change its name to
Express Scripts Holding Company.
Completion of the mergers requires, among other things, the
separate approvals of both Express Scripts stockholders and
Medco stockholders. To obtain these required approvals, Express
Scripts will hold a special meeting of Express Scripts
stockholders on December 21, 2011 and Medco will hold a
special meeting of Medco stockholders on December 21, 2011.
EXPRESS SCRIPTS AND MEDCOS BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE
PROPOSALS TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
Information about the special meetings, the mergers and the
other business to be considered by Express Scripts stockholders
and Medco stockholders is contained in this document and the
documents incorporated by reference, which we urge you to read
carefully. In particular, see Risk Factors beginning
on page 37.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to
attend the special meeting of Express Scripts stockholders or
the special meeting of Medco stockholders, as applicable, please
submit a proxy to vote your shares as soon as possible to make
sure your shares are represented at the applicable special
meeting. Your failure to vote will have the same effect as
voting against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
|
|
|
[SIGNATURE]
|
|
[SIGNATURE]
|
George Paz
|
|
David B. Snow, Jr.
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
|
Express Scripts, Inc.
|
|
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities
to be issued in connection with the mergers or determined if the
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated
November 14, 2011, and is first being mailed or otherwise
delivered to stockholders of Express Scripts and stockholders of
Medco on or about November 18, 2011.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates
by reference important business and financial information about
Express Scripts and Medco from documents that are not included
in or delivered with the joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
information is available to you without charge upon your written
or oral request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by
reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus by requesting
them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at
the following addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
Saint Louis, Missouri, 63121
Attention: Investor Relations
(314) 810-3115
www.express-scripts.com (Investor Information
tab)
|
|
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail Stop F3-3
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
Attention: Investor Relations
(201) 269-4279
www.medcohealth.com (Investors tab)
|
In addition, if you have questions about the mergers or the
special meetings, or if you need to obtain copies of the
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, proxy cards,
election forms or other documents incorporated by reference in
the joint proxy statement/prospectus, you may contact the
appropriate contact listed below. You will not be charged for
any of the documents you request.
|
|
|
If you are an Express Scripts stockholder:
MacKenzie Partners Inc.
105 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
(800) 322-2885
(call toll free)
(212) 929-5500
(call collect)
E-mail:
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
|
|
If you are a Medco stockholder:
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10005
(800) 967-4612 (call toll free) or
(212) 269-5550 (call collect)
E-mail: medco@dfking.com
|
If you would like to request documents, please do so by
December 19, 2011, in order to receive them before the
special meetings.
For a more detailed description of the information incorporated
by reference in the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus and how you may obtain it, see Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 208
of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
One Express Way
Saint Louis, Missouri 63121
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
December 21,
2011
The board of directors of Express Scripts, Inc. has called for a
special meeting of the stockholders of Express Scripts, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Express Scripts), to be held
at the principal executive offices of Express Scripts, One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121, on December 21,
2011 at 7:30 a.m., Central time, to consider and vote upon the
following matters:
1. to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
July 20, 2011, as amended on November 7, 2011 and as
it may be amended from time to time (the merger
agreement), by and among Express Scripts, Medco Health
Solutions, Inc. (Medco), Aristotle Holding, Inc.
(New Express Scripts), Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc.,
and Plato Merger Sub, Inc; and
2. to approve the adjournment of the special meeting (if it
is necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement).
THE EXPRESS SCRIPTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT EXPRESS SCRIPTS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR EACH
PROPOSAL.
The record date for the determination of the stockholders
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Express Scripts
special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the
Express Scripts special meeting, was the close of business on
November 4, 2011. At least ten days prior to the meeting, a
complete list of stockholders of record as of November 4,
2011 will be available for inspection by any stockholder for any
purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours,
at the office of the Secretary of the Company at One Express
Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121. As a stockholder of record,
you are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person.
Regardless of whether you expect to be present at the meeting,
please either complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card
and mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope, or vote
electronically via the Internet or telephone as described in
greater detail in the proxy statement and on the enclosed proxy
card. Returning the enclosed proxy card, or voting
electronically or telephonically, will not affect your right to
vote in person if you attend the meeting. You should NOT send
certificates representing Express Scripts common stock with the
proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Keith J. Ebling
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary
One Express Way
Saint Louis, Missouri 63121
November 14, 2011
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE YOUR
SHARES PROMPTLY, WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE
SPECIAL MEETING. YOU CAN FIND INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOTING ON
THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MERGERS
OR THE SPECIAL MEETING PLEASE CONTACT EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.,
ATTENTION: INVESTOR RELATIONS, ONE EXPRESS WAY, SAINT LOUIS,
MISSOURI 63121,
(314) 810-3115.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT VOTING YOUR SHARES, PLEASE FOLLOW
THE CONTACT INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARD.
MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS,
INC.
100 Parsons Pond Drive
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
December 21,
2011
The board of directors of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. has
called for a special meeting of the stockholders of Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Medco), to
be held at the Woodcliff Lake Hilton, 200 Tice Boulevard,
Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07677 on December 21, 2011 at
9:00 a.m., Eastern time, to consider and vote upon the following
matters:
1. to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
July 20, 2011, as amended on November 7, 2011 and as
it may be amended from time to time (the merger
agreement), by and among Express Scripts, Inc., Medco,
Aristotle Holding, Inc., Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., and Plato
Merger Sub, Inc;
2. to approve the adjournment of the special meeting (if it
is necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger
agreement); and
3. to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, certain
compensation arrangements for Medcos named executive
officers in connection with the mergers contemplated by the
merger agreement.
THE MEDCO BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT
MEDCO STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR EACH PROPOSAL.
Holders of Medco common stock of record at the close of business
on November 4, 2011 are entitled to vote at the Medco
special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the Medco
special meeting. At least ten days prior to the meeting, a
complete list of stockholders of record as of November 4
will be available for inspection by any stockholder for any
purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours,
at the office of the Secretary of Medco at 100 Parsons Pond
Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417. As a stockholder of
record, you are cordially invited to attend the meeting in
person. Regardless of whether you expect to be present at the
meeting, please either complete, sign and date the enclosed
proxy card and mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope, or
vote electronically via the Internet or telephone as described
in greater detail in the proxy statement and on the enclosed
proxy card. Returning the enclosed proxy card, or voting
electronically or telephonically, will not affect your right to
vote in person if you attend the meeting. You should NOT send
certificates representing Medco common stock with the proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Thomas M. Moriarty
General Counsel, Secretary and President,
Global Pharmaceutical Strategies
November 14, 2011
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE YOUR
SHARES PROMPTLY, WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE
SPECIAL MEETING. YOU CAN FIND INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOTING ON
THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MERGERS
OR THE SPECIAL MEETING PLEASE CONTACT MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS,
INC., ATTENTION: INVESTOR RELATIONS, 100 PARSONS POND DRIVE,
FRANKLIN LAKES, NEW JERSEY 07471,
(201) 269-3400.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT VOTING YOUR SHARES, PLEASE FOLLOW
THE CONTACT INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARD.
JOINT
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX A
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger as amended by
Amendment No. 1
|
|
A-1
|
ANNEX B
|
|
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC
|
|
B-1
|
ANNEX C
|
|
Opinion of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
|
|
C-1
|
ANNEX D
|
|
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
D-1
|
ANNEX E
|
|
Opinion of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
E-1
|
ANNEX F
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Aristotle Holding, Inc.
|
|
F-1
|
ANNEX G
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Aristotle Holding,
Inc.
|
|
G-1
|
ANNEX H
|
|
Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware
|
|
H-1
|
iv
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGERS AND THE SPECIAL MEETINGS
The following questions and answers are intended to address
briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the mergers and
the special meetings. These questions and answers may not
address all questions that may be important to you as a
stockholder. To better understand these matters, and for a
description of the legal terms governing the mergers, you should
carefully read this entire joint proxy statement/prospectus,
including the annexes, as well as the documents that have been
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 208. All references in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Express
Scripts refer to Express Scripts, Inc., a Delaware
corporation; all references in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to Medco refer to Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation; all references in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus to New Express
Scripts refer to Aristotle Holding, Inc. (which we
anticipate will change its name to Express Scripts Holding
Company following consummation of the mergers), a Delaware
corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Express
Scripts; all references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
to Express Scripts Merger Sub refer to Aristotle
Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts; all references in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus to Medco Merger Sub
refer to Plato Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts; all
references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the
Merger Subs refer to the Express Scripts Merger Sub
and the Medco Merger Sub, collectively; unless otherwise
indicated or as the context requires, all references in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus to we refer to
Express Scripts and Medco; and all references to the
merger agreement refer to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of July 20, 2011, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 7,
2011 (which we refer to as the first amendment to the merger
agreement), and as it may be amended from time to time, by and
among Express Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts, Express
Scripts Merger Sub and Medco Merger Sub, a copy of which is
attached as Annex A to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
About the
Mergers
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus? |
|
A: |
|
Express Scripts and Medco have entered into the merger agreement
providing for the combination of Express Scripts and Medco under
a new holding company named Aristotle Holding, Inc. (which we
refer to as New Express Scripts). Pursuant to the merger
agreement, Medco Merger Sub will be merged with and into Medco,
and Express Scripts Merger Sub will be merged with and into
Express Scripts. As a result, Medco and Express Scripts will
each become wholly owned subsidiaries of New Express Scripts. As
a result of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, former Medco and Express Scripts stockholders will
own stock in New Express Scripts, which is expected to be listed
for trading on the NASDAQ. We refer to these mergers as the
Medco merger and the Express Scripts merger, respectively, and
together as the mergers. |
|
|
|
Medco is holding a special meeting of stockholders, which we
refer to as the Medco special meeting, in order to obtain the
stockholder approval necessary to adopt the merger agreement,
which we refer to as the Medco stockholder approval. Medco
stockholders will also be asked to approve the adjournment of
the Medco special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement) and to approve, by non-binding,
advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers. |
|
|
|
Express Scripts is holding a special meeting of stockholders,
which we refer to as the Express Scripts special meeting, in
order to obtain the stockholder approval necessary to adopt the
merger agreement. We refer to this approval as the Express
Scripts stockholder approval. Express Scripts stockholders will
also be asked to approve the adjournment of the Express Scripts
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement). |
|
|
|
We will be unable to complete the mergers unless both the
Express Scripts stockholder approval and the Medco stockholder
approval are obtained at the respective special meetings. |
1
|
|
|
|
|
We have included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
important information about the mergers, the merger agreement (a
copy of which is attached as Annex A) and the Express
Scripts and Medco special meetings. You should read this
information carefully and in its entirety. The enclosed voting
materials allow you to vote your shares without attending the
applicable special meeting. Your vote is very important and we
encourage you to submit your proxy as soon as possible. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Medco stockholders receive in the Medco merger? |
|
A: |
|
Upon completion of the Medco merger, each share of common stock
of Medco, par value $0.01 per share, which we refer to as Medco
common stock, will be converted into (i) the right to
receive $28.80 in cash, without interest and
(ii) 0.81 shares of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable New Express Scripts common stock, par value $0.01
per share, which we refer to collectively as the Medco merger
consideration. Shares of Medco common stock held in a Medco
employee benefit plan will be converted into the Medco merger
consideration. However, shares held by Medco as treasury stock
or that are owned by Medco, Medco Merger Sub or any wholly owned
subsidiary of Medco and shares with respect to which appraisal
rights are properly exercised and not withdrawn, which we
collectively refer to as the Medco excluded shares, will not
receive the Medco merger consideration. Shares held by Medco as
treasury stock or that are owned by Medco, Medco Merger Sub or
any wholly owned subsidiary of Medco will be canceled. |
|
|
|
Medco stockholders will not receive any fractional shares of New
Express Scripts common stock in the Medco merger. Instead of
receiving any fractional shares, each holder of Medco common
stock will be paid an amount in cash, without interest, rounded
down to the nearest cent, equal to the product of (i) the
amount of the fractional share interest in a share of New
Express Scripts common stock to which such holder would
otherwise be entitled (rounded to three decimal places) and
(ii) an amount equal to the average of the closing sale
prices of Express Scripts common stock on the NASDAQ Stock
Market, which we refer to as the NASDAQ, for each of the 15
consecutive trading days ending with the fourth complete trading
day prior to the date on which the closing of the mergers takes
place, which we refer to as the closing date. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Express Scripts stockholders receive in the Express
Scripts merger? |
|
A: |
|
Upon completion of the Express Scripts merger, each share of
common stock of Express Scripts, par value $0.01 per share,
which we refer to as Express Scripts common stock, will be
converted into one share of New Express Scripts common stock,
which we refer to as the Express Scripts merger consideration.
Shares held by Express Scripts as treasury stock or that are
owned by Express Scripts, Express Scripts Merger Sub or any
other wholly owned subsidiary of Express Scripts, which we refer
to as the Express Scripts excluded shares, will not receive the
Express Scripts merger consideration and will be canceled. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my share certificates now for the
exchange? |
|
A: |
|
Medco Stockholders: No. Medco stockholders should
keep any share certificates they hold at this time. After the
mergers are completed, Medco stockholders holding Medco share
certificates will receive from New Express Scripts
exchange agent a letter of transmittal and instructions on how
to obtain the Medco merger consideration. |
|
|
|
Express Scripts Stockholders: No. Express Scripts
stockholders should keep any Express Scripts share certificates
they hold both now and after the mergers are completed. As of
the effective time of the Express Scripts merger, holders of
Express Scripts common stock will be deemed to have received
shares of New Express Scripts common stock (without the
requirement to surrender any certificate previously representing
shares of Express Scripts common stock or the issuance of new
certificates representing New Express Scripts common stock). |
|
Q: |
|
What equity stake will former Medco stockholders and Express
Scripts stockholders hold in New Express Scripts? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Upon completion of the mergers, it is anticipated that Express
Scripts stockholders, on the one hand, and Medco stockholders,
on the other hand, will hold approximately 59% and 41%,
respectively, of the shares |
2
|
|
|
|
|
of common stock of New Express Scripts issued and outstanding
immediately after the consummation of the mergers. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I calculate the value of the Medco merger
consideration? |
|
A: |
|
Because New Express Scripts will issue a fixed number of shares
of New Express Scripts common stock in exchange for each share
of Medco common stock, the value of the Medco merger
consideration that Medco stockholders will receive in the Medco
merger for each share of Medco common stock will depend on the
price per share of Express Scripts common stock at the time the
merger is completed. That price will not be known at the time of
the Medco special meetings and may be greater or less than the
current price of Express Scripts common stock or the price of
Express Scripts common stock at the time of the special meetings. |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the closing price of $52.54 per share of Express
Scripts common stock on the NASDAQ on July 20, 2011, the
date of the execution of the merger agreement and the last
trading day before the public announcement of the merger
agreement, the Medco merger consideration represented
approximately $71.36 per share of Medco common stock, a premium
of 27.9% over the closing price of $55.78 per share of Medco
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, which we refer to
as the NYSE, on July 20, 2011. Based on the closing price
of $47.02 per share of Express Scripts common stock on the
NASDAQ on November 10, 2011, the latest practicable date before
the printing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the Medco
merger consideration represented approximately $66.89 per share
of Medco common stock. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I calculate the value of the Express Scripts merger
consideration? |
|
A: |
|
Because New Express Scripts will issue a fixed number of shares
of New Express Scripts common stock in exchange for each share
of Express Scripts common stock, the value of the Express
Scripts merger consideration that Express Scripts stockholders
will receive in the Express Scripts merger for each share of
Express Scripts common stock will depend on the price per share
of Express Scripts common stock at the time the merger is
completed. That price will not be known at the time of the
Express Scripts special meetings and may be greater or less than
the current price or the price at the time of the special
meetings. |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the closing price of $52.54 per share of Express
Scripts common stock on the NASDAQ on July 20, 2011, the
date of the execution of the merger agreement and the last
trading day before the public announcement of the merger
agreement, the Express Scripts merger consideration represented
$52.54 per share of Express Scripts common stock. Based on the
closing price of $47.02 per share of Express Scripts common
stock on the NASDAQ on November 10, 2011, the latest practicable
date before the printing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the Express Scripts merger consideration
represented approximately $47.02 per share of Express Scripts
common stock. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What conditions must be satisfied to complete the mergers? |
|
A: |
|
Express Scripts and Medco are not required to complete the
merger unless a number of conditions are satisfied or waived.
These conditions include, among others: (i) receipt of both
the Express Scripts stockholder approval and Medco stockholder
approval; (ii) that the shares of New Express Scripts
common stock have been approved for listing on the NASDAQ,
subject to official notice of issuance; (iii) absence of
any injunctions, orders or laws that would prohibit, restrain or
make illegal the mergers; (iv) effectiveness of the
registration statement on
Form S-4,
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, and
the absence of any stop order; and (v) receipt of certain
regulatory approvals and the completion of certain regulatory
filings, including expiration or termination of the waiting
period (and any extensions thereof) under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder, which we refer to as the HSR
Act, and unless they are not received prior to the fifth
business day prior to the outside date, without giving any
effect to any extension thereof, certain approvals from, and
filings with, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services and certain state insurance departments relating to
Express Scripts and Medcos insurance company
subsidiaries. Additionally, Express Scripts is not required to
complete the mergers unless (i) there are no legal
proceedings commenced by a governmental entity seeking an order
that would prohibit, restrain or make illegal the consummation
of the mergers under U.S. antitrust laws; (ii) there are no
motions by a governmental entity |
3
|
|
|
|
|
pending in a United States Court of Appeals, seeking an
expedited appeal of the matters set forth in clause (i)
that have been granted; (iii) no request for any such
expedited appeal by a governmental entity has been made; and
(iv) all deadlines to make any request referred to in
clause (iii) have passed, except in the cases of
clauses (iii) and (iv), to the extent any such request or
petition has been subsequently denied; provided that the
conditions summarized in clauses (iii) and (iv) will
cease to be conditions from and after the 5th business day
preceding the outside date (as the outside date may be extended
pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement) (as more fully
described in the section titled Termination of
the Merger Agreement). |
|
|
|
|
|
For a more complete summary of the conditions that must be
satisfied or waived prior to completion of the mergers, see
The Merger Agreement Conditions to the
Merger beginning on page 174. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Express Scripts Special Meeting: Holders of a
majority in voting power of the Express Scripts common stock
issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Express
Scripts special meeting, present in person or represented by
proxy, constitutes a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, a
majority of the Express Scripts stockholders, present in person
or represented by proxy, will have power to adjourn the special
meeting. As of the record date for the Express Scripts special
meeting, 242,745,155 shares of Express Scripts common stock
would be required to achieve a quorum. |
|
|
|
|
|
Medco Special Meeting: Holders of one-third of
the outstanding shares of Medco common stock entitled to vote at
the Medco special meeting, present in person or represented by
proxy, constitutes a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, the
chairman of the meeting or a majority of the Medco stockholders,
present in person or represented by proxy, will have the power
to adjourn the special meeting. As of the record date for the
Medco special meeting, 129,050,938 shares of Medco common
stock would be required to achieve a quorum. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve each Medco proposal? |
|
A: |
|
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement by Medco
stockholders: Adopting the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of Medco common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Accordingly, a Medco stockholders failure to submit a
proxy card or to vote in person at the special meeting, an
abstention from voting, or the failure of a Medco stockholder
who holds his or her shares in street name through a
broker or other nominee to give voting instructions to such
broker or other nominee, which we refer to as a broker non-vote,
will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Proposal to Adjourn the Medco Special Meeting by Medco
stockholders: Approving the adjournment of the
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement) requires the affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the shares of Medco common stock present, in
person or represented by proxy, at the special meeting and
entitled to vote on the adjournment proposal. Accordingly,
abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn the special meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal Regarding Certain Medco Merger-Related
Executive Compensation Arrangements: In
accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (as amended), which we refer to as the Exchange Act,
Medco is providing stockholders with the opportunity to approve,
by non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation payments for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers, as reported in the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Advisory Vote on
Merger-Related Compensation for Medco Named Executive
Officers beginning on page 182. Approving this
merger-related executive compensation requires the affirmative
vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Medco common
stock present, in person or represented by proxy, at the special
meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal to approve such
merger-related compensation. Accordingly, abstentions will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal
to approve the merger-related executive |
4
|
|
|
|
|
compensation, while broker non-votes and shares not in
attendance at the special meeting will have no effect on the
outcome of any vote to approve the merger-related executive
compensation. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve each Express Scripts
proposal? |
|
A: |
|
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement by Express Scripts
stockholders: Adopting the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of Express Scripts common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote. Accordingly, an Express Scripts stockholders
failure to submit a proxy card or to vote in person at the
special meeting, an abstention from voting, or the failure of an
Express Scripts stockholder who holds his or her shares in
street name through a broker or other nominee to
give voting instructions to such broker or other nominee, will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal
to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Proposal to Adjourn the Express Scripts Special Meeting by
Express Scripts Stockholders: Approving the
adjournment of the special meeting (if it is necessary or
appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement) requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Express Scripts common stock present, in person or represented
by proxy, at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the
adjournment proposal, regardless of whether a quorum is present.
Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn the special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the recommendations of the Medco board of
directors? |
|
A: |
|
The Medco board of directors, which we refer to as the Medco
board, has unanimously (i) approved the merger agreement
and consummation of the Medco merger upon the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the merger agreement, the
Medco merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Medco and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the merger
agreement be submitted to Medco stockholders for adoption at the
Medco special meeting, (iv) recommended that Medcos
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and (v) declared
that the merger agreement is advisable. |
|
|
|
The Medco board unanimously recommends that Medco
stockholders vote: |
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement;
FOR the proposal to approve the adjournment of
the special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement); and
FOR the proposal to approve, by non-binding,
advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
See The Mergers Recommendation of the Medco
Board; Medcos Reasons for the Merger beginning on
page 86. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the recommendations of the Express Scripts board of
directors? |
|
A: |
|
The Express Scripts board has unanimously (i) approved the
merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement upon the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the Express Scripts
merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, Express
Scripts and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the
merger agreement be submitted to Express Scripts stockholders
for adoption, (iv) recommended that Express Scripts
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and (v) declared
that the merger agreement is advisable. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
The Express Scripts board unanimously recommends that Express
Scripts stockholders vote: |
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement;
and
FOR the proposal to approve the adjournment of
the special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement).
|
|
|
|
|
See The Mergers Recommendation of the Express
Scripts Board; Express Scripts Reasons for the
Mergers beginning on page 105. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the mergers to be completed? |
|
A: |
|
Express Scripts and Medco are working to complete the mergers as
quickly as possible, and we anticipate that they will be
completed in the first half of 2012. However, the mergers are
subject to various regulatory approvals and other conditions
which are described in more detail in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and it is possible that factors outside
the control of both companies could result in the mergers being
completed at a later time, or not at all. |
|
Q: |
|
What are my U.S. Federal income tax consequences as a result
of the mergers? |
|
A: |
|
It is anticipated that the Express Scripts merger and the Medco
merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange described in
Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, which we refer to as the Code. It is a condition to
Medcos obligation to complete the Medco merger that Medco
receive a written opinion of its counsel, Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, which we refer to as Sullivan &
Cromwell, to the effect that the Express Scripts merger and the
Medco merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange
described in Section 351 of the Code. It is a condition to
Express Scripts obligation to complete the Express Scripts
merger that New Express Scripts receive an opinion of its
counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
which we refer to as Skadden, to the effect that the Express
Scripts merger and the Medco merger, taken together, will
qualify as an exchange described in Section 351 of the
Code. If the Express Scripts merger and the Medco merger, taken
together, qualify as an exchange described in Section 351,
then: |
|
|
|
U.S. holders (as defined in the section entitled
The Mergers Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences) of Express Scripts common stock will not
recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a
result of the exchange of Express Scripts common stock for New
Express Scripts common stock; and
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders of Medco common stock generally will
recognize gain, but not loss, on the exchange of Medco common
stock for a combination of New Express Scripts common stock and
cash (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional
shares) equal to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
the excess of (i) the sum of the fair market
value of New Express Scripts common stock received in the Medco
merger and the amount of cash received in the Medco merger over
(ii) the stockholders tax basis in the Medco common
stock surrendered in the Medco merger, and
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash received by such stockholder in
the Medco merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are strongly urged to consult with a tax advisor to
determine the particular U.S. federal, state or local or foreign
income or other tax consequences of the mergers to you. See
The Mergers Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences on page 141. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are Medco stockholders entitled to appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
Under Delaware law, holders of shares of Medco common stock that
meet certain requirements will have the right to obtain payment
in cash for the fair value of their shares of Medco common
stock, as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, rather
than the Medco merger consideration. To exercise appraisal
rights, Medco stockholders must strictly follow the procedures
prescribed by Delaware law. These procedures are summarized
under the section entitled The Mergers
Appraisal Rights beginning |
6
|
|
|
|
|
on page 145. In addition, the text of the applicable
appraisal rights provisions of Delaware law is included as
Annex H to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are Express Scripts stockholders entitled to appraisal
rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. Under Delaware law, holders of shares of Express
Scripts common stock will not have the right to obtain payment
in cash for the fair value of their shares of Express Scripts
common stock, as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery,
rather than the Express Scripts merger consideration. |
|
Q: |
|
If the mergers are completed, when can I expect to receive
the Medco merger consideration for my shares of Medco common
stock? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Certificated Shares: As soon as reasonably
practicable after the effective time of the Medco merger, New
Express Scripts will cause an exchange agent to mail to each
holder of certificated shares of Medco common stock a form of
letter of transmittal and instructions for use in effecting the
exchange of Medco common stock for the Medco merger
consideration. After receiving the proper documentation from a
holder of Medco common stock, the exchange agent will deliver to
such holder the cash and New Express Scripts common stock to
which such holder is entitled under the merger agreement. More
information on the documentation a holder of Medco common stock
is required to deliver to the exchange agent may be found under
the section entitled The Mergers Conversion of
Shares; Exchange of Certificates; No Fractional Shares
beginning on page 137. |
|
|
|
|
|
Book Entry Shares: Each holder of record of
one or more book entry shares of Medco common stock whose shares
will be converted into the right to receive the Medco merger
consideration will automatically, upon the effective time of the
Medco merger, be entitled to receive, and New Express Scripts
will cause the exchange agent to deliver to such holder as
promptly as practicable after the effective time, the cash and
New Express Scripts common stock to which such holder is
entitled under the merger agreement. Holders of book entry
shares will not be required to deliver a certificate or an
executed letter of transmittal to the exchange agent in order to
receive the Medco merger consideration. |
|
Q: |
|
If the mergers are completed, when can I expect to receive
the New Express Scripts common stock for my shares of Express
Scripts common stock? |
|
|
|
|
|
The conversion of shares of Express Scripts common stock into
shares of New Express Scripts common stock will occur
automatically at the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger. As of the effective time of the Express Scripts merger,
holders of Express Scripts common stock will be deemed to have
received shares of New Express Scripts common stock (without the
requirement to surrender any certificate previously representing
shares of Express Scripts common stock or the issuance of new
certificates representing New Express Scripts common stock).
Additional information may be found under the section entitled
The Mergers Conversion of Shares; Exchange of
Certificates; No Fractional Shares beginning on
page 137. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I sell my shares of Medco common stock or
Express Scripts common stock before the applicable special
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The record dates for the Medco special meeting, which we refer
to as the Medco record date, and for the Express Scripts special
meeting, which we refer to as the Express Scripts record date,
are earlier than the date of the special meetings and the date
that the mergers are expected to be completed. If you transfer
your shares after the applicable record date, but before the
applicable special meeting, unless the transferee requests a
proxy, you will retain your right to vote at such special
meeting, but will have transferred the right to receive the
Medco merger consideration or the Express Scripts merger
consideration, as applicable, in the mergers. In order to
receive the Medco merger consideration or the Express Scripts
merger consideration, as applicable, you must hold your shares
through completion of the mergers. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I sell my shares of Medco common stock or
Express Scripts common stock after the applicable special
meeting, but before the applicable effective time? |
|
A: |
|
If you transfer your shares after the applicable special
meeting, but before the applicable effective time, you will have
transferred the right to receive Medco merger consideration or
Express Scripts merger |
7
|
|
|
|
|
consideration, as applicable, in the mergers. In order to
receive the Medco merger consideration or the Express Scripts
merger consideration, you must hold your shares of Medco or
Express Scripts, as applicable. through completion of the
mergers. |
About the
Special Meetings
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where will the Medco and Express Scripts special
meetings be held? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Medco: The Medco special meeting will be held
at the Woodcliff Lake Hilton, 200 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff
Lake, New Jersey 07677 on December 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.,
Eastern time, unless the special meeting is adjourned or
postponed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts: The Express Scripts special
meeting will be held at the principal executive offices of
Express Scripts, One Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121 on
December 21, 2011, at 7:30 a.m., Central time, unless the
special meeting is adjourned or postponed. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the Medco and Express Scripts
special meetings? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Medco Special Meeting: Medco has fixed
November 4, 2011 as the Medco record date. If you were a
Medco stockholder at the close of business on the Medco record
date, you are entitled to vote on matters that come before the
Medco special meeting. However, a Medco stockholder may only
vote his or her shares if he or she is present in person or is
represented by proxy at the Medco special meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts Special Meeting: Express
Scripts has fixed November 4, 2011 as the Express Scripts
record date. If you were an Express Scripts stockholder at the
close of business on the Express Scripts record date, you are
entitled to vote on matters that come before the Express Scripts
special meeting. However, an Express Scripts stockholder may
only vote his or her shares if he or she is present in person or
is represented by proxy at the Express Scripts special meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How many votes do I have? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Medco: Medco stockholders are entitled to one
vote at the Medco special meeting for each share of Medco common
stock held of record as of the Medco record date. As of the
close of business on the Medco record date, there were
387,152,813 outstanding shares of Medco common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts: Express Scripts stockholders
are entitled to one vote at the Express Scripts special meeting
for each share of Express Scripts common stock held of record as
of the Express Scripts record date. As of the close of business
on the Express Scripts record date, there were 485,490,309
outstanding shares of Express Scripts common stock. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I hold shares in both Express Scripts and Medco? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a stockholder of both Express Scripts and Medco, you
will receive two separate packages of proxy materials. A vote as
a Medco stockholder for the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement will not constitute a vote as an Express Scripts
stockholder for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, or
vice versa. THEREFORE, PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN ALL
PROXY CARDS THAT YOU RECEIVE, WHETHER FROM EXPRESS SCRIPTS OR
MEDCO, OR SUBMIT A PROXY AS BOTH AN EXPRESS SCRIPTS AND MEDCO
STOCKHOLDER OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE. |
|
Q: |
|
My shares are held in street name by my broker.
Will my broker automatically vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or
by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the
beneficial holder of the shares held for you in what
is known as street name. If this is the case, this
joint proxy statement/prospectus has been forwarded to you by
your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, or its agent. As the
beneficial holder, you have the right to direct your broker,
bank or other nominee as to how to vote your shares. If you do
not provide voting instructions to your broker on a particular
proposal on which your broker does not have discretionary
authority to vote, your shares will not be voted on that
proposal. This is called a broker non-vote. |
8
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that (i) under the DGCL, broker non-votes will
be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence
of a quorum at the Express Scripts special meeting and the Medco
special meeting and (ii) under the current rules of the
NYSE and the NASDAQ, brokers do not have discretionary authority
to vote on either of the Express Scripts proposals or on any of
the Medco proposals. To the extent that there are any broker
non-votes, a broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement but will have no effect on the other proposals. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
Read and consider the information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus carefully, and then please vote your shares
as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at
your special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
You can vote in person by completing a ballot at the special
meeting, or you can vote by proxy before the special meeting.
Even if you plan to attend your companys special meeting,
we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy as soon as
possible. After carefully reading and considering the
information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
please submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet in
accordance with the instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy
card, or mark, sign and date the proxy card, and return it in
the enclosed postage-paid envelope as soon as possible so that
your shares may be voted at your companys special meeting.
For detailed information, see The Express Scripts Special
Meeting How to Vote beginning on page 73
and The Medco Special Meeting How to
Vote beginning on page 68. YOUR VOTE IS VERY
IMPORTANT. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
As a participant in a Medco or Express Scripts 401(k) plan or
employee stock purchase plan, how do I vote shares held in my
plan account? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a participant in the Express Scripts Inc. Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, you should have received separate proxy
voting instruction cards from the plan trustees and you have the
right to provide voting directions to the plan trustee by
submitting your voting instruction card for those shares of
Express Scripts common stock that are held by the plan and
allocated to your plan account. |
|
|
|
Participants in the Medco Health Solutions, Inc. 401(k) Savings
Plan will receive separate voting instruction cards covering
their shares held in the plan. The plan trustee will not vote
shares of Medco common stock for which no voting instructions
are received from plan participants. Shares of Medco common
stock purchased through a Medco employee stock purchase plan,
including the employee stock purchase program previously
maintained for employees of Accredo Health, Incorporated under
the Accredo Health, Incorporated 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
are held in brokerage accounts and are treated the same as other
beneficially owned shares. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy by
telephone or over the Internet or submitted my completed proxy
card? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote by revoking your proxy at any time
before it is voted at the Medco or Express Scripts special
meeting, as applicable. You can do this in one of four ways:
(1) submit a proxy again by telephone or over the Internet
prior to midnight on the night before the special meeting;
(2) sign another proxy card with a later date and return it
prior to midnight on the night before the special meeting;
(3) attend the applicable special meeting and complete a
ballot; or (4) send a written notice of revocation to the
secretary of Medco or Express Scripts, as applicable, so that it
is received prior to midnight on the night before the special
meeting. |
|
|
|
If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must
follow directions received from your broker to change your vote. |
9
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What should stockholders do if they receive more than one set
of voting materials for a special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
You may receive more than one set of voting materials for a
special meeting, including multiple copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or voting
instruction cards. Please complete, sign, date and return each
proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive. For
example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage
account, you will receive a separate voting instruction card for
each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a
holder of record and your shares are registered in more than one
name, you will receive more than one proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
Who should I call if I have questions about the proxy
materials or voting procedures? |
|
A: |
|
If you have questions about the merger, or if you need
assistance in submitting your proxy or voting your shares or
need additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact the proxy
solicitation agent for the company in which you hold shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you are a Medco stockholder, you should contact D.F.
King & Co., Inc., the proxy solicitation agent for
Medco, by mail at 48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY
10005 by telephone at
(800) 967-4612
(toll free) or
(212) 269-5550
(collect), or by email at medco@dfking.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you are an Express Scripts stockholder, you should contact
MacKenzie Partners Inc., the proxy solicitation agent for
Express Scripts, by mail at 105 Madison Avenue, New York, NY
10016, by telephone at
(800) 322-2885
(toll free) or
(212) 929-5500
(collect), or by
e-mail at
proxy@mackenziepartners.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a
bank or other nominee, you should contact your broker, bank or
other nominee for additional information. |
10
SUMMARY
The following summary highlights selected information from
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all of
the information that may be important to you. Accordingly,
stockholders are encouraged to carefully read this entire joint
proxy statement/prospectus, its annexes and the documents
referred to or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Each item in this summary includes a page
reference directing you to a more complete description of that
item. Please see the section entitled Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 208.
Information
about the Companies (Page 64)
Express
Scripts, Inc.
Express Scripts, Inc., which we refer to as Express Scripts, was
incorporated in Missouri in September 1986, and reincorporated
in Delaware in March 1992. Express Scripts provides integrated
pharmacy benefit management services including network-pharmacy
claims processing, home delivery services, specialty benefit
management, benefit-design consultation, drug-utilization
review, formulary management, and medical and drug data analysis
services. Express Scripts also distributes a full range of
biopharmaceutical products and provides extensive
cost-management and patient-care services. Express Scripts
principal executive offices are located at One Express Way,
Saint Louis, Missouri, 63121. Express Scripts telephone
number is
(314) 996-0900
and its web site is www.express-scripts.com.
Medco
Health Solutions, Inc.
The predecessor entity to Medco Health Solutions, Inc. was
originally incorporated in June 1983 and operated as a publicly
traded company from 1984 until its acquisition by
Merck & Co., Inc. in 1993. After its spin-off from
Merck & Co., Inc., Medco Health Solutions, Inc., which
we refer to as Medco, became an independent publicly traded
company on August 19, 2003. Medco provides pharmacy benefit
management services, including comprehensive management of
prescription claims, benefit-design consultation, clinical
management services, clinical and specialty pharmacy services
and research support. Medcos principal executive offices
are located at 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Franklin Lakes, New
Jersey 07417. Medcos telephone number is
(201) 269-3400
and its web site is www.medcohealth.com.
Aristotle
Holding, Inc.
Aristotle Holding, Inc., which we refer to as New Express
Scripts, is a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of Express Scripts. Aristotle Holding, Inc. was
organized on July 15, 2011, solely for the purpose of
effecting the mergers and, following consummation of the
mergers, we anticipate that Aristotle Holding, Inc. will change
its name to Express Scripts Holding Company.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Plato Merger Sub, Inc. will be
merged with and into Medco, and Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc. will
be merged with and into Express Scripts. As a result, Medco and
Express Scripts will each become wholly owned subsidiaries of
New Express Scripts. As a result of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, New Express Scripts will
become a publicly traded corporation, and former Medco and
Express Scripts stockholders will own stock in New Express
Scripts. New Express Scripts has not carried on any activities
other than in connection with the mergers. New Express
Scripts principal executive offices are located at One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121.
Aristotle
Merger Sub, Inc.
Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., which we refer to as Express Scripts
Merger Sub, is a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of New Express Scripts. Express Scripts Merger Sub
was organized on July 15, 2011, solely for the purpose of
effecting the mergers. Express Scripts Merger Sub will be merged
with and into Express Scripts and, as a result, Express Scripts
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts. It
has not carried on any activities other than in connection with
the mergers. Express Scripts Merger Subs principal
executive offices are located at One Express Way, Saint Louis,
Missouri 63121.
11
Plato
Merger Sub, Inc.
Plato Merger Sub, Inc., which we refer to Medco Merger Sub, is a
Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of New
Express Scripts. Medco Merger Sub was organized on July 15,
2011, solely for the purpose of effecting the mergers. Medco
Merger Sub will be merged with and into Medco and, as a result,
Medco will become a wholly owned subsidiary of New Express
Scripts. It has not carried on any activities other than in
connection with the mergers. Medco Merger Subs principal
executive offices are located at One Express Way, Saint Louis,
Missouri 63121.
The
Mergers
Express Scripts and Medco have entered into the merger agreement
providing for the combination of Express Scripts and Medco under
a new holding company, New Express Scripts. As a result of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, former Medco
stockholders and Express Scripts stockholders will own stock in
New Express Scripts, which is expected to be listed for trading
on the NASDAQ. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Medco Merger
Sub will be merged with and into Medco, and Express Scripts
Merger Sub will be merged with and into Express Scripts. As a
result, Medco and Express Scripts will each become wholly owned
subsidiaries of New Express Scripts.
12
The organization of Express Scripts, Medco and New Express
Scripts before and after the mergers is illustrated on the
following page.
13
Merger
Consideration Received by Medco Stockholders
(Page 154)
As a result of the Medco merger, each outstanding share of Medco
common stock, other than Medco excluded shares, will be
converted into (i) the right to receive $28.80 in cash,
without interest and (ii) 0.81 shares of validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable of New Express Scripts
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, which we refer to as
New Express Scripts common stock. Medco stockholders will not
receive any fractional shares of New Express Scripts common
stock pursuant to the Medco merger. Instead of receiving any
fractional shares, each holder of Medco common stock will be
paid an amount in cash, without interest, rounded down to the
nearest cent, equal to the product of (A) the amount of the
fractional share interest in a share of New Express Scripts
common stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled
(rounded to three decimal places) and (B) an amount equal
to the average of the closing sale prices of Express Scripts
common stock on the NASDAQ for each of the 15 consecutive
trading days ending with the fourth complete trading day prior
to the closing date. A description of the New Express Scripts
common stock to be issued in connection with the Medco merger is
set forth under the section entitled Description of New
Express Scripts Capital Stock beginning on page 187.
Merger
Consideration Received by Express Scripts Stockholders
(Page 154)
As a result of the Express Scripts merger, each outstanding
share of Express Scripts common stock, other than Express
Scripts excluded shares, will be converted into one share of New
Express Scripts common stock (without the requirement to
surrender any certificate previously representing any shares of
Express Scripts common stock or the issuance of new certificates
representing New Express Scripts common stock). A description of
the New Express Scripts common stock to be issued in connection
with the Express Scripts merger is set forth in the section
entitled Description of New Express Scripts Capital
Stock beginning on page 187.
Total New
Express Scripts Shares to be Issued
Based on the number of shares of Medco common stock outstanding
as of November 4, 2011 and the number of shares of Express
Scripts common stock outstanding as of November 4, 2011,
the latest practicable date before the printing of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, and assuming no Medco stock options
or Express Scripts stock options are exercised between
November 4, 2011 and the effective times of the mergers,
the total number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock
will be approximately 799,084,088.
Comparative
Per Share Market Price and Dividend Information
(Page 36)
Express Scripts common stock is listed on the NASDAQ under the
symbol ESRX. Medco common stock is listed on the
NYSE under the symbol MHS. The following table shows
the closing prices of Express Scripts common stock and Medco
common stock as reported on July 20, 2011, the last trading
day before the merger agreement was publicly announced, and on
November 10, 2011, the last practicable trading day before
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This table
also shows the value of the Medco merger consideration per share
of Medco common stock, which was calculated by adding
(i) the cash portion of the Medco merger consideration, or
$28.80, and (ii) the closing price of Express Scripts
common stock as of the specified date multiplied by the exchange
ratio of 0.81.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medco
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
|
Value Per Share of
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Medco Common Stock
|
|
|
July 20, 2011
|
|
$
|
55.78
|
|
|
$
|
52.54
|
|
|
$
|
71.36
|
|
November 10, 2011
|
|
$
|
56.87
|
|
|
$
|
47.02
|
|
|
$
|
66.89
|
|
The market prices of Express Scripts common stock and Medco
common stock will fluctuate prior to the consummation of the
mergers. You should obtain current market quotations for the
shares.
Neither Medco nor Express Scripts currently pays a quarterly
dividend on its common stock. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, during the period before the effective times of the
mergers, Medco is prohibited from paying any dividends on its
common stock and Express Scripts is prohibited from paying any
14
dividend on its common stock, unless Medco or Express Scripts
has received written consent from the other party.
Medco
Special Meeting (Page 65)
Date,
Time and Place
A special meeting of the stockholders of Medco will be held at
the Woodcliff Lake Hilton, 200 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake,
New Jersey 07677 on December 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.,
Eastern time, unless the special meeting is adjourned or
postponed.
Purpose
of the Special Meeting
At the special meeting, Medco stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Medco special
meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit additional
proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger
agreement); and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, certain
compensation arrangements for Medcos named executive
officers in connection with the mergers contemplated by the
merger agreement.
|
Record
Date; Shares Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of shares of Medco common stock at the
close of business on the Medco record date (November 4,
2011) will be entitled to vote shares held at that date at the
Medco special meeting or any adjournments or postponements
thereof. Each outstanding share of Medco common stock entitles
its holder to cast one vote.
As of the Medco record date, there were 387,152,813 shares
of Medco common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the
Medco special meeting.
Vote
Required
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement by Medco
stockholders: Adopting the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of Medco common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Accordingly, a Medco stockholders failure to submit a
proxy card or to vote in person at the special meeting, an
abstention from voting, or the failure of a Medco stockholder
who holds his or her shares in street name through a
broker or other nominee to give voting instructions to such
broker or other nominee, will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement.
Proposal to Adjourn the Medco Special Meeting by Medco
stockholders: Approving the adjournment of the
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement) requires the affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the shares of Medco common stock present, in
person or represented by proxy, at the special meeting and
entitled to vote on the adjournment proposal. Accordingly,
abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn the special meeting.
Proposal Regarding Certain Medco Merger-Related
Executive Compensation Arrangements: In
accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, Medco is
providing stockholders with the opportunity to approve, by
non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation payments for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers, as reported in the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Advisory Vote on
Merger-related Compensation for Medco Named Executive
Officers beginning on page 182. Approving this
merger-related executive compensation requires the affirmative
vote of holders of a majority of
15
the shares of Medco common stock present, in person or
represented by proxy, at the special meeting and entitled to
vote on the proposal to approve such merger-related
compensation. Accordingly, abstentions will have the same
effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal to approve the
merger-related executive compensation, while broker non-votes
and shares not in attendance at the special meeting will have no
effect on the outcome of any vote to approve the merger-related
executive compensation.
Express
Scripts Special Meeting (Page 70)
Date,
Time and Place
A special meeting of the stockholders of Express Scripts will be
held at the principal executive offices of Express Scripts, One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121 on December 21,
2011, at 7:30 a.m., Central time, unless the special meeting is
adjourned or postponed.
Purposes
of the Special Meeting
At the special meeting, Express Scripts stockholders will be
asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the special meeting (if
it is necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if
there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement)
|
Record
Date; Shares Entitled to Vote
Holders of Express Scripts common stock as of the close of
business on the Express Scripts record date (November 4, 2011)
are entitled to vote at the special meeting or any adjournment
or postponement thereof. Each share of Express Scripts common
stock is entitled to one vote. As of the Express Scripts record
date, 485,490,309 shares of Express Scripts common stock
were outstanding.
Vote
Required
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement by Express Scripts
stockholders: Adopting the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of Express Scripts common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote. Accordingly, an Express Scripts
stockholders failure to submit a proxy card or to vote in
person at the special meeting, an abstention from voting, or the
failure of an Express Scripts stockholder who holds his or her
shares in street name through a broker or other
nominee to give voting instructions to such broker or other
nominee, will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
Proposal to Adjourn the Express Scripts Special Meeting by
Express Scripts stockholders: Approving the
adjournment of the special meeting (if it is necessary or
appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement) requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Express Scripts common stock present, in person or represented
by proxy, at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the
adjournment proposal, regardless of whether a quorum is present.
Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn the special meeting.
Recommendation
of the Medco Board (Page 86)
The Medco board has unanimously (i) approved the merger
agreement and consummation of the Medco merger upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the merger agreement, the
Medco merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Medco and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the merger
agreement be submitted to Medco stockholders for adoption at the
Medco special meeting, (iv) recommended
16
that Medcos stockholders adopt the merger agreement and
(v) declared that the merger agreement is advisable. In
addition, on November 7, 2011, the Medco board approved the
first amendment to the merger agreement and recommended that
Medcos stockholders adopt the merger agreement as so
amended.
THE MEDCO
BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT MEDCO STOCKHOLDERS
VOTE:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER
AGREEMENT;
|
|
|
|
FOR THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING (IF IT IS NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO
SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES TO
ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT); AND
|
|
|
|
FOR THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE, BY NON-BINDING,
ADVISORY VOTE, CERTAIN COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR
MEDCOS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MERGERS CONTEMPLATED BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
|
We refer to the recommendation that Medco stockholders vote
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement as the Medco recommendation. See The
Mergers Recommendation of the Medco board;
Medcos Reasons for the Merger beginning on
page 86.
Recommendation
of the Express Scripts Board (Page 105)
The Express Scripts board has unanimously (i) approved the
merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement upon the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the Express Scripts
merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, Express
Scripts and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the
merger agreement be submitted to Express Scripts stockholders
for adoption, (iv) recommended that Express Scripts
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and (v) declared
that the merger agreement is advisable.
THE EXPRESS SCRIPTS BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT EXPRESS
SCRIPTS STOCKHOLDERS VOTE:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER
AGREEMENT; AND
|
|
|
|
FOR THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING (IF IT IS NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO
SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES TO
ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT).
|
We refer to the recommendation that Express Scripts stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement as the Express Scripts recommendation. See The
Mergers Recommendation of the Express Scripts Board;
Express Scripts Reasons for the Mergers beginning on
page 105.
Opinions
of Financial Advisors to Medco (Page 90)
Opinion
of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
On July 20, 2011, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which we
refer to as J.P. Morgan, rendered its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing on the same day, to the Medco
board that, as of such date and subject to the various factors,
procedures, assumptions, qualifications and limitations set
forth in its written opinion, the Medco merger consideration to
be paid in the Medco merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of Medcos common stock.
The full text of J.P. Morgans written opinion
dated July 20, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated herein by reference. The summary of
J.P. Morgans opinion set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus under the caption titled Opinions of
Financial Advisors to Medco Opinion of
J.P. Morgan beginning on page 90 is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
17
Medcos stockholders are urged to read the opinion in
its entirety. J.P. Morgan provided its opinion for the
information of the Medco board (in its capacity as such) in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
J.P. Morgans written opinion addresses only the
fairness of the Medco merger consideration to be paid to the
holders of Medcos common stock in the Medco merger, and
does not address any other matter. J.P. Morgans
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any of
Medcos stockholders as to how such stockholder should vote
with respect to the transactions contemplated in the merger
agreement or any other matter. The Medco merger consideration to
be paid to the holders of Medcos common stock in the Medco
merger was determined in negotiations between Medco and Express
Scripts, and the decision to approve and recommend the
transactions contemplated in the merger agreement was made
independently by the Medco board. J.P. Morgans
opinion and financial analyses were among the many factors
considered by the Medco board in its evaluation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and should not
be viewed as determinative of the views of the Medco board or
management with respect to the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement or the Medco merger consideration.
J.P. Morgan and Lazard are collectively referred to herein
as Medcos financial advisors.
Opinion
of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
On July 20, 2011, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC,
which we refer to as Lazard, rendered its oral opinion to the
Medco board of directors, subsequently confirmed in writing,
that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the
assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations
set forth therein, the per share merger consideration to be paid
to holders of Medco common stock (other than shares of Medco
common stock held in treasury by Medco or owned by Medco, Medco
Merger Sub or any other wholly owned subsidiary of Medco, or
holders who are entitled to and properly demand an appraisal of
their shares of Medco common stock) in the mergers was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders.
The full text of Lazards written opinion, dated
July 20, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and
limitations on the review undertaken by Lazard in connection
with its opinion is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex C and is incorporated into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. We encourage
you to read Lazards opinion, and the section titled
Opinions of Financial Advisors to Medco
Opinion of Lazard beginning on page 97, carefully and
in their entirety. Lazards opinion was directed to
Medcos board of directors for the information and
assistance of the Medco board of directors in connection with
its evaluation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and only addressed the fairness, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of Medco common stock of the per
share merger consideration to be paid to certain holders of
Medco common stock in the mergers as of the date of
Lazards opinion. Lazards opinion did not address any
other aspect of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and was not intended to and does not constitute a
recommendation to any holder of Medco common stock as to how
such holder should vote or act with respect to the mergers or
any matter relating thereto.
Opinions
of Financial Advisors to Express Scripts
(Page 109)
Opinion
of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
In connection with the mergers, Express Scripts financial
advisor, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, which we refer to
as Credit Suisse, delivered an opinion, dated July 20,
2011, to the Express Scripts board as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view and as of the date of such opinion, to
Express Scripts of the Medco merger consideration. The full text
of Credit Suisses written opinion is attached to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex D and sets forth,
among other things, the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the scope of review
undertaken. Credit Suisses opinion was provided to the
Express Scripts board (in its capacity as such) for its
information in connection with its evaluation of the Medco
merger consideration and did not address any other aspect of the
proposed mergers, including the relative merits of the mergers
as compared to alternative transactions or strategies that might
be available to Express Scripts or the underlying business
decision of Express
18
Scripts to proceed with the mergers. The opinion does not
constitute advice or a recommendation to any stockholder as to
how such stockholder should vote or act on any matter relating
to the proposed mergers or otherwise.
Opinion
of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., which we refer to as Citigroup,
was retained to act as financial advisor to Express Scripts in
connection with the proposed transaction. In connection with
this engagement, Express Scripts requested Citigroup to evaluate
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
consideration to be issued and paid in the Medco merger by
Express Scripts as of the date of Citigroups opinion. On
July 20, 2011, at a meeting of the Express Scripts board,
Citigroup rendered to the Express Scripts board an oral opinion,
which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated
July 20, 2011, to the effect that, as of that date and
based on and subject to the matters, considerations and
limitations set forth in the opinion, Citigroups work and
other factors it deemed relevant, each as described in greater
detail in the section titled The Mergers
Opinions of Financial Advisors to Express Scripts, the
consideration to be issued and paid by Express Scripts in the
Medco merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Express Scripts. Citigroups opinion, the issuance of which
was approved by Citigroups authorized internal committee,
was provided to the Express Scripts board in connection with its
evaluation of the proposed Medco merger and was limited to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date of the
opinion, to Express Scripts of the consideration to be issued
and paid by Express Scripts in the Medco merger.
Citigroups opinion does not address any other aspects
or implications of the mergers and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed
mergers. The summary of Citigroups opinion is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. We
encourage you to read the full text of Citigroups written
opinion, which is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex E and sets forth, among other
things, the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters
considered and limitations on the scope of review undertaken.
Credit Suisse and Citigroup are collectively referred to herein
as Express Scripts financial advisors.
Interests
of Officers and Directors in the Mergers
(Page 131)
Certain of Medcos and Express Scripts executive
officers and directors have financial interests in the mergers
that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of
Medcos and Express Scripts stockholders. The members
of the Medco board and the Express Scripts board were aware of
and considered these interests, among other matters, in
evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and the mergers
and in recommending to Medco and Express Scripts stockholders
that the merger agreement be adopted. These interests are
described in more detail in the section of this document
entitled The Mergers Interests of Officers and
Directors in the Merger beginning on page 131.
Governmental
and Regulatory Approvals (Page 139)
Express Scripts and Medco are not required to complete the
merger unless a number of regulatory conditions are satisfied or
waived. These conditions include: (i) absence of any
injunctions, orders or laws that would prohibit, restrain or
make illegal the mergers and (ii) receipt of certain
regulatory approvals and the completion of certain regulatory
filings, including expiration or termination of the waiting
period (and any extensions thereof) under the HSR Act, and
unless they are not received prior to the fifth business day
prior to the outside date, without giving any effect to any
extension thereof, certain approvals from, and filings with, the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain
state insurance departments relating to Express Scripts
and Medcos insurance company subsidiaries. Additionally,
Express Scripts is not required to complete the mergers unless
(i) there are no legal proceedings commenced by a
governmental entity seeking an order that would prohibit,
restrain or make illegal the consummation of the mergers under
U.S. antitrust laws; (ii) there are no motions by a
governmental entity pending in a United States Court of Appeals,
seeking an expedited appeal of the matters set forth in
clause (i) that has been granted; (iii) no request for
any such expedited appeal by a governmental entity has been
made; and (iv) all deadlines to make any request referred
19
to in clause (iii) have passed, except in the cases of
clauses (iii) and (iv), to the extent any such request or
petition has been subsequently denied; provided that the
conditions summarized in clauses (iii) and (iv) will
cease to be conditions from and after the 5th business day
preceding the outside date (as it may be extended) (as more
fully described in the section titled
Termination of the Merger Agreement).
Each of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and Medco have
agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions necessary, proper or advisable to comply
promptly with all legal requirements which may be imposed on
such party or its subsidiaries with respect to the mergers, to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
as promptly as practicable and to obtain (and to cooperate with
the other party to obtain) any consent, authorization, order or
approval of, or any exemption by, any governmental entity or any
other third party which is required in connection with the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and to comply
with the terms and conditions of any such consent,
authorization, order or approval. These approvals include
approval under, or notices pursuant to, the HSR Act and certain
approvals from, and filings with, the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain state
insurance departments relating to Express Scripts and
Medcos insurance company subsidiaries.
Medco and Express Scripts have also agreed that in no event will
Express Scripts or New Express Scripts or their subsidiaries or
affiliates be required to (nor will Medco and its subsidiaries
be permitted to unless directed by Express Scripts),
(i) divest, license, hold separate or otherwise dispose of,
or allow a third party to utilize, any portion of its or their
respective businesses, assets or contracts (subject to certain
exceptions listed below) or (ii) take any other action that
may be required or requested by any governmental entity in
connection with obtaining the consents, authorizations, orders
or approvals contemplated by the merger agreement that would
have an adverse impact, in any material respect, on the business
of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts, Medco or their
respective subsidiaries. However, Express Scripts has agreed,
conditioned on the closing, to the extent necessary to ensure
satisfaction of certain conditions to the closing of the
mergers, on or prior to the outside date (as it may be
extended), to:
|
|
|
|
|
the divestiture or disposition of one mail order dispensing
facility of Express Scripts, Medco or any of their respective
subsidiaries; provided that it is not the Express Scripts
facility located in St. Louis, Missouri;
|
|
|
|
the divestiture or disposition of the property, plant and
equipment associated with specialty pharmacy dispensing or
infusion facilities of Express Scripts, Medco or any of their
respective subsidiaries having a net book value not in excess of
$30 million in the aggregate; provided that it not include
the property, plant or equipment at the Express Scripts facility
located in Indianapolis, Indiana; and
|
|
|
|
the divestiture, disposition, termination, expiration,
assignment, delegation, novation or transfer of contracts of
Express Scripts, Medco or their respective subsidiaries which
generated, collectively, EBITDA not in excess of
$115 million during the most recently available 12 calendar
month period ending on the applicable date of such agreement;
provided, that in the case of pharmacy benefits management
customer contracts, the aggregate annual number of adjusted
prescription drug claims subject to this obligation will not
exceed 35 million (where adjusted prescription drug
claims means (x) retail prescription drug claims,
plus the product of (y)(i) mail prescription drug claims
multiplied by (ii) three, such calculation to be performed
using claims made during the preceding 12 calendar month period)
and EBITDA means EBITDA as calculated by Express
Scripts in a manner consistent with the methodology utilized in
the earnings releases Express Scripts has publicly filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the
SEC).
|
While the parties have agreed, under certain circumstances, to
take the actions set forth in the paragraph above pursuant to
the merger agreement, the parties may also elect to take other
actions. Express Scripts, after prior consultation with Medco to
the extent practicable, shall have the principal responsibility
for devising and implementing the strategy for obtaining any
necessary antitrust or competition clearances, and shall take
the lead in all meetings and communications with any
governmental entity in connection with obtaining any necessary
antitrust or competition clearances. The parties have also
agreed that, as between Express Scripts and Medco, Express
Scripts will determine the manner in which any of the actions
specified in the three bullet points above will be implemented.
20
Under the HSR Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, the Medco merger may not be consummated until the
expiration of a 30-calendar-day waiting period following the
parties filing of their respective HSR Act notification
forms or the earlier termination of that waiting period. If the
U.S. Department of Justice, which we refer to as the DOJ,
or the Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the FTC,
issues a Request for Additional Information and Documentary
Material, which we refer to as a second request, prior to the
expiration of the initial waiting period, the parties must
observe a second
30-day
waiting period, which would begin to run only after both parties
have substantially complied with the request for additional
information, unless the waiting period is terminated earlier.
Express Scripts and Medco each filed the required HSR
notification and report forms on August 3, 2011, commencing
the initial 30-calendar-day waiting period. As previously
disclosed by each of Medco and Express Scripts in their
respective current reports on
Form 8-K,
filed September 6, 2011, on September 2, 2011, Express
Scripts and Medco each received a second request from the FTC in
connection with the FTCs review of the Medco merger. A
second request was anticipated by the parties at the time of
signing of the merger agreement. Issuance of the second request
extends the waiting period under the HSR Act until 30 days
after both parties have substantially complied with the
requests, unless the waiting period is terminated sooner by the
FTC. Express Scripts and Medco have been cooperating with the
FTC staff since shortly after the announcement of the mergers
and intend to continue to work cooperatively with the FTC staff
in the review of the Medco merger. Express Scripts and Medco
intend to respond to the second request as promptly as
practicable.
At any time before or after the mergers are completed, either
the DOJ, the FTC or U.S. state attorneys general could take
action under the antitrust laws in opposition to the mergers,
including seeking to enjoin completion of the mergers, condition
completion of the mergers upon the divestiture of assets of
Express Scripts, Medco or their subsidiaries or impose
restrictions on New Express Scripts post-merger
operations. Private parties may also seek to take legal action
under the antitrust laws under some circumstances.
Express Scripts and Medco have been making the necessary
notifications and filings with both state and federal
regulators, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services and certain state insurance departments, to obtain the
consents, authorizations and approvals contemplated by the
merger agreement.
Express Scripts and Medco are not aware of any material
governmental approvals or actions that are required for
completion of the mergers other than those described above. It
is presently contemplated that if any such additional
governmental approvals or actions are required, those approvals
or actions will be sought.
Express Scripts and Medco cannot assure you that all of the
regulatory approvals described above will be obtained and, if
obtained, Express Scripts and Medco cannot assure you as to the
timing of any approvals, the ability to obtain the approvals on
satisfactory terms or the absence of any litigation challenging
such approvals.
Description
of Financing (Page 184)
Upon completion of the Medco merger, Medco stockholders will
receive cash consideration of approximately $11.1 billion
in the aggregate. The consummation of the mergers is not subject
to Express Scripts ability to obtain financing. However,
Express Scripts intends to obtain financing for a portion of the
cash component of the Medco merger consideration.
On August 5, 2011, Express Scripts entered into a
$14.0 billion unsecured bridge facility, which we refer to
as the bridge facility, the terms of which are set forth in a
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 5, 2011, which we
refer to as the bridge credit agreement, among Express Scripts,
New Express Scripts, the lenders named therein, Citibank, N.A.,
as syndication agent, and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands
Branch, which we refer to as CS, as administrative agent. Prior
to the consummation of the Express Scripts merger, Express
Scripts is the borrower under the bridge facility. New Express
Scripts will assume the role, rights and obligations of Express
Scripts and become the borrower under the bridge credit
agreement upon consummation of the Express Scripts merger. The
bridge facility will be available for Express Scripts to pay a
portion of the cash consideration in accordance with the merger
agreement, to repay any existing indebtedness that will
21
become due or otherwise default upon consummation of the
mergers and to pay related fees and expenses. On August 29,
2011, Express Scripts entered into a five-year $4.0 billion
term loan facility, which we refer to as the term facility, and
a five-year $1.5 billion revolving loan facility, which we
refer to as the revolving facility and, together with the term
facility, as the permanent facility, the terms of which are set
forth in a Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2011,
which we refer to as the term/revolving credit agreement, among
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts, the lenders named therein,
Citibank, N.A., as syndication agent, and CS, as administrative
agent. Prior to the consummation of the Express Scripts merger,
Express Scripts is the borrower under the permanent facility.
New Express Scripts will assume the role, rights and obligations
of Express Scripts and become the borrower under the
term/revolving credit agreement upon consummation of the Express
Scripts merger. The term facility will be available for Express
Scripts to pay a portion of the cash consideration in accordance
with the merger agreement, to repay any existing indebtedness
that will become due or otherwise default upon consummation of
the mergers and to pay related fees and expenses. The revolving
facility will be available for working capital needs and general
corporate purposes. Upon entry into the term facility, the
commitments under the bridge facility were automatically reduced
by $4.0 billion. For a more complete description of Express
Scripts debt financing for the mergers, see the section
entitled Description of Financing beginning on
page 184.
Express Scripts intends to borrow $4.0 billion under the
term facility in connection with the mergers. The balance of the
financing in connection with the mergers could take any of
several forms or any combination of them, including but not
limited to the following: (i) Express Scripts may draw
funds under the bridge facility; (ii) Express Scripts may
issue senior notes in the public
and/or
private capital markets; and (iii) Express Scripts may use
cash on hand. When any senior notes are issued, the commitments
under the bridge facility will automatically reduce in an amount
equal to the aggregate principal amount of such senior notes.
In connection with the completion of the mergers, New Express
Scripts will guarantee the existing indebtedness of Express
Scripts and Medco. New Express Scripts pro forma
consolidated indebtedness as of September 30, 2011, after
giving effect to the mergers, would be approximately
$19.8 billion.
No
Solicitation (Page 164)
Subject to certain exceptions, each of Express Scripts and Medco
has agreed to not solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage, or
take any other action designed to facilitate, any inquiries or
the making of any proposal which constitutes, or may reasonably
be expected to lead to, any takeover proposal (as defined in the
merger agreement) from any third party, or engage in any
discussions or negotiations regarding any takeover proposal.
Notwithstanding these restrictions, the merger agreement
provides that, prior to obtaining stockholder approval to adopt
the merger agreement, under specific circumstances, each of
Express Scripts and Medco may provide information to, and engage
in discussions and negotiations with, third parties in response
to an unsolicited acquisition proposal that constitutes or which
is reasonably expected to lead to a superior proposal (as
defined in the merger agreement) if the Medco board or the
Express Scripts board, as applicable, determines in good faith,
after consultation with outside legal counsel, that a failure to
take such action with respect to the takeover proposal would be
inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to its stockholders under
applicable law.
Restrictions
on Recommendation Withdrawal (Page 166)
The merger agreement generally restricts the ability of each of
the Express Scripts and Medco boards of directors from
withdrawing its recommendation that its stockholders adopt the
merger agreement. However, each of the Express Scripts board and
the Medco board may withdraw its recommendation (i) in
circumstances not involving or relating to a takeover proposal,
if such board concludes in good faith, after consultation with
its outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action
would be inconsistent with the exercise of its fiduciary duties
to its stockholders under applicable laws; or (ii) in
response to a superior proposal, if such board of directors
concludes that a failure to change its recommendation would be
inconsistent with the exercise of its fiduciary duties to its
stockholders under applicable laws and, if requested by the
other party, its representatives shall have negotiated in good
faith with the other party for six business days (and in the
case of any material amendment or modification to such superior
proposal, for a period expiring upon the later to
22
occur of three business days and the end of such six business
day period) regarding any revisions to the terms of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement proposed by
the other party in response to such superior proposal. Each of
Medco and Express Scripts, as the case may be, have the
contractual right to the benefit of the matching rights
described in the foregoing sentence no more than one time with
respect to a takeover proposal, including any material
amendments or modifications thereof.
Conditions
to Completion of the Mergers (Page 174)
Conditions
to Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and
Medcos Obligations to Complete the Mergers
The obligations of Express Scripts, Express Scripts Merger Sub
and New Express Scripts to consummate the Express Scripts merger
and of Medco, Medco Merger Sub and New Express Scripts to
consummate the Medco merger are subject to the satisfaction or
waiver, to the extent permitted, of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Medco has obtained the Medco stockholder approval, and Express
Scripts has obtained the Express Scripts stockholder approval;
|
|
|
|
the shares of New Express Scripts common stock issuable pursuant
to the merger agreement have been approved for listing on the
NASDAQ subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any order which prohibits, restrains or makes
illegal the consummation of the mergers;
|
|
|
|
effectiveness of the registration statement for the New Express
Scripts common stock being issued in the mergers and the absence
of any stop order suspending such effectiveness; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of certain regulatory approvals and the completion of
certain regulatory filings, including expiration or termination
of the waiting period under the HSR Act (and any extensions
thereof) and, unless they are not received prior to the fifth
business day prior to the outside date, without giving effect to
any extension thereof, certain approvals from, and filings with,
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and
certain state insurance departments relating to Express
Scripts and Medcos insurance company subsidiaries.
|
Conditions
to Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the
Merger Subs Obligation to Complete the
Mergers
The obligations of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and
Express Scripts Merger Sub to consummate the Express Scripts
merger and of New Express Scripts and Medco Merger Sub to
consummate the Medco merger are subject to the satisfaction or
waiver, to the extent permitted, of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Medcos representations and warranties are true and correct
as of the date of the merger agreement and the closing date,
subject to certain materiality or material adverse
effect qualifications described in the merger agreement,
and Express Scripts has received a certificate from officers of
Medco to that effect;
|
|
|
|
Medco has performed in all material respects all of its
obligations under the merger agreement, and Express Scripts has
received a certificate from officers of Medco to that effect;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by New Express Scripts of a tax opinion from Skadden
to the effect that the Express Scripts merger and the Medco
merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange described in
Section 351 of the Code; and
|
|
|
|
the (i) absence of any legal proceedings commenced by a
governmental entity seeking an order that would prohibit,
restrain or make illegal the consummation of the mergers under
U.S. antitrust laws; (ii) the absence of any motions
by a governmental entity pending in a United States Court of
Appeals, seeking an expedited appeal of the matters set forth in
clause (i) that have been granted; (iii) the absence
of any request for any such expedited appeal by a governmental
entity; and (iv) all deadlines to make any request referred
to in clause (iii) have passed without any request for such
expedited appeal having been made or filed by any governmental
entity, except in the cases of clauses (iii) and (iv), to
the extent any such request or petition has been subsequently
denied; provided that the conditions
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
summarized in clauses (iii) and (iv) will cease to be
conditions from and after the fifth business day preceding the
outside date (as it may be extended) (as more fully described in
the section titled Termination of the Merger
Agreement).
|
Conditions
to Medcos Obligation to Complete the Mergers
The obligation of Medco to consummate the Medco merger is
subject to the satisfaction or waiver, to the extent permitted,
of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
New Express Scripts, Express Scripts and the Merger
Subs representations and warranties are true and correct
as of the date of the merger agreement and the closing date,
subject to certain materiality or material adverse
effect qualifications described in the merger agreement,
and Medco has received a certificate from officers of Express
Scripts to that effect;
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts has performed in all material respects all of
its obligations under the merger agreement, and Medco has
received a certificate from officers of Express Scripts to that
effect; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt by Medco of a tax opinion from Sullivan &
Cromwell to the effect that the Express Scripts merger and the
Medco merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange
described in Section 351 of the Code.
|
Closing
(Page 153)
Under the terms of the merger agreement, the closing of the
mergers will occur as soon as practicable (but in any event,
within three business days) after satisfaction or waiver of the
conditions set forth in the merger agreement. We refer to the
date on which the closing occurs as the closing date. However,
neither Express Scripts nor Medco is obligated to effect the
closing prior to the third business day following the final day
of a marketing period (described below in the section titled
The Merger Agreement Marketing Period)
or such earlier date as Express Scripts may request on two
business days written notice to Medco.
Termination
(Page 176)
The merger agreement may be terminated and the mergers may be
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger, whether before or after the Medco stockholder approval
and/or the
Express Scripts stockholder approval:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
by either of Medco or Express Scripts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if any governmental entity has issued an order permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the mergers and
such order has become final and non-appealable.
|
|
|
|
if the mergers have not been consummated by April 20, 2012,
which we refer to as the outside date; provided, that if the
conditions relating to (i) the absence of any order of a
governmental entity prohibiting the mergers, (ii) obtaining
the required governmental consents and (iii) the absence of
legal proceedings seeking to prohibit the mergers have not been
satisfied (or deemed satisfied) or waived by the fifth business
day prior to April 20, 2012, either Express Scripts or
Medco may extend the outside date from time to time to a date
not later than July 20, 2012, and if such conditions have
not been satisfied (or deemed satisfied) or waived by the fifth
business day prior to July 20, 2012, either Express Scripts
or Medco may extend the outside date from time to time to a date
not later than October 22, 2012. This right of termination
is not available to a party if its action or failure to act
constitutes a material breach or violation of its covenants,
agreements or other obligations under the merger agreement and
such material breach or violation is the principal cause of, or
directly resulted in, (x) the failure to satisfy the
conditions to the obligations of the terminating party to
consummate the merger prior to the outside date (as it may be
extended) or (y) the failure of the closing to occur by the
outside date (as it may be extended).
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
if the Express Scripts stockholder approval has not been
obtained upon a vote taken at the duly convened Express Scripts
special meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of such
meeting.
|
|
|
|
if the Medco stockholder approval has not been obtained upon a
vote taken at the duly convened Medco special meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of such meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (i) the Express Scripts board or any committee thereof
makes, prior to the Express Scripts special meeting, an adverse
recommendation change (as summarized in the section entitled
The Mergers No Solicitation beginning on
page 164); (ii) the Express Scripts board or any
committee fails to include the Express Scripts recommendation in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus; (iii) a tender offer
or exchange offer is commenced and the Express Scripts board
fails to recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or
exchange offer by Express Scripts stockholders; (iv) the
Express Scripts board or any committee refuses to affirm
publicly the Express Scripts recommendation following any
reasonable written request by Medco; or (v) the Express
Scripts board formally resolves to take or publicly announces an
intention to take any of the foregoing summarized actions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder
approval, if Express Scripts is in willful breach of its
obligation to make and not withdraw the Express Scripts
recommendation or its non-solicitation obligations (for purposes
of the merger agreement, willful breach means
(i) with respect to any breach of a representation or
warranty contained in the merger agreement, a material breach of
such representation or warranty that has been made with the
knowledge of the breaching party, (ii) with respect to any
breaches or failures to perform any of the covenants or other
agreements contained in the merger agreement, a material breach,
or failure to perform, that is a consequence of an act or
omission undertaken by the breaching party with the knowledge
that the taking of, or failure to take, such act would, or would
be reasonably expected to, cause a material breach of the merger
agreement and (iii) the failure by any party to consummate
the mergers after all of the conditions to the mergers have been
satisfied or waived (by the party entitled to waive any such
applicable conditions));
|
|
|
|
if Express Scripts breaches or fails to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth
in the merger agreement, and such breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a closing condition
regarding the accuracy of Express Scripts representations
and warranties or Express Scripts compliance with its
covenants and agreements and (ii) is incapable of being
cured by Express Scripts by the outside date (as it may be
extended); or
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Medco stockholder approval, so that
Medco may enter into a definitive agreement providing for a
superior proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (i) the Medco board or any committee thereof makes,
prior to the Medco special meeting, an adverse recommendation
change; (ii) the Medco board or any committee fails to
include the Medco recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus; (iii) a tender offer or exchange
offer is commenced and the Medco board fails to recommend
against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by
Medco stockholders; (iv) the Medco board or any committee
refuses to affirm publicly the Medco recommendation following
any reasonable written request by Express Scripts; or
(v) the Medco board formally resolves to take or publicly
announces an intention to take any of the foregoing summarized
actions;
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Medco stockholder approval, if Medco
is in willful breach of its obligation to make and not withdraw
the Medco recommendation or its non-solicitation obligations;
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
if Medco breaches or fails to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth
in the merger agreement, and such breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a closing condition
regarding the accuracy of Medcos representations and
warranties or Medcos compliance with its covenants and
agreements and (ii) is incapable of being cured by Medco by
the outside date (as it may be extended); or
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder
approval, so that Express Scripts may enter into a definitive
agreement providing for a superior proposal.
|
Termination
Fees; Expenses (Page 178)
All fees and expenses incurred by the parties are to be paid
solely by the party that has incurred such fees and expenses
except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the parties have agreed to share equally (i) the filing fee
under the HSR Act and any fees for similar filings under foreign
laws, (ii) the expenses in connection with printing and
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus, (iii) all
SEC filing fees paid or payable relating to the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
in the event that the merger agreement is terminated due to a
failure to obtain the Express Scripts stockholder approval at
the Express Scripts special meeting, or any adjournment or
postponement thereof, Express Scripts will pay to Medco all
documented, out of pocket expenses of Medco (including financing
expenses) not to exceed $225 million; and
|
|
|
|
in the event that the merger agreement is terminated due to a
failure to obtain the Medco stockholder approval at the Medco
special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof,
Medco will pay to Express Scripts all documented, out of pocket
expenses of Express Scripts (including financing expenses) not
to exceed $225 million.
|
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for
Express Scripts and provides that Medco will pay Express Scripts
a cash termination fee of $650 million, which we refer to
as the termination fee, under specified circumstances, including
if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Express Scripts, or could
have been terminated by Express Scripts because: (i) the
Medco board or any committee thereof makes, prior to the Medco
special meeting, an adverse recommendation change, (ii) the
Medco board or any committee fails to include the Medco
recommendation in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
(iii) a tender offer or exchange offer is commenced and the
Medco board fails to recommend against acceptance of such tender
offer or exchange offer by Medco stockholders, (iv) the
Medco board or any committee refuses to affirm publicly the
Medco recommendation following any reasonable written request by
Express Scripts or (v) or the Medco board formally resolves
to take or publicly announces an intention to take any of the
foregoing summarized actions; provided that for each of the
foregoing clauses (i)-(v), in the event that there was no
takeover proposal outstanding with respect to Medco at the time
of the event giving rise to Express Scripts right to
terminate the merger agreement, the termination fee will be
$950 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Express Scripts, or at the
time of termination could have been terminated by Express
Scripts because, prior to the receipt of the Medco stockholder
approval, Medco is in willful breach of its obligation to make
and not withdraw the Medco recommendation or its
non-solicitation obligations; or
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Medco prior to the receipt
of the Medco stockholder approval, so that Medco may enter into
a definitive agreement providing for a superior proposal.
|
26
The merger agreement provides that Medco will pay Express
Scripts $227.5 million of the termination fee plus Express
Scripts documented, out of pocket expenses up to
$100 million if the merger agreement is, or could have
been, terminated as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to consummate the mergers prior to the outside date
(as it may be extended), and a takeover proposal (substituting
40% for 15% in the definition of
takeover proposal in the merger agreement) for Medco
is publicly disclosed prior to the date of termination and the
vote seeking the Medco stockholder approval had not been taken
prior to the seventh business day prior to the outside date (as
it may be extended); or
|
|
|
|
a failure to obtain the Medco stockholder approval at the Medco
special meeting, and a takeover proposal (substituting
40% for 15% in the definition of
takeover proposal) is publicly disclosed prior to
the date of the Medco special meeting.
|
If, within one year of a termination described in either of the
previous two bullets, Medco enters into a definitive agreement
providing for, or otherwise consummates, a takeover proposal
(substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of takeover proposal in the merger
agreement), then Medco will pay to Express Scripts the full
amount of the termination fee less any amount of the termination
fee and any expenses previously paid.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Express
Scripts expenses or the full amount of the termination fee
be paid more than once, nor shall Express Scripts be paid an
aggregate amount pursuant to the expense reimbursement and
termination fee provisions of the merger agreement in excess of
the full amount of the termination fee.
The merger agreement also contains reciprocal termination rights
for Medco, specifically that Express Scripts will pay Medco the
termination fee under specified circumstances, including if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Medco, or could have been
terminated by Medco because: (i) the Express Scripts board
or any committee thereof makes, prior to the Express Scripts
special meeting, an adverse recommendation change, (ii) the
Express Scripts board or any committee fails to include the
Express Scripts recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, (iii) a tender offer or exchange
offer is commenced and the Express Scripts board fails to
recommend against acceptance of such tender offer or offer by
Express Scripts stockholders, (iv) the Express Scripts
board or any committee refuses to affirm publicly the Express
Scripts recommendation following any reasonable written request
by Medco or (v) or the Express Scripts board formally
resolves to take or publicly announces an intention to take any
of the foregoing summarized actions; provided that for each of
the foregoing clauses (i) - (v), in the event that there was no
takeover proposal outstanding with respect to Express Scripts at
the time of the event giving rise to Medcos right to
terminate the merger agreement, the termination fee will be
$950 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Medco, or at the time of
termination could have been terminated by Medco because, prior
to the receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder approval,
Express Scripts is in willful breach of its obligation to make
and not withdraw the Express Scripts recommendation or its
non-solicitation obligations; or
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Express Scripts prior to
the receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder approval, so that
Express Scripts may enter into a definitive agreement providing
for a superior proposal.
|
The merger agreement provides that Express Scripts will pay
Medco $227.5 million of the termination fee plus
Medcos documented,
out-of-pocket
expenses up to $100 million if the merger agreement is, or
could have been, terminated as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to consummate the mergers prior to the outside date
(as it may be extended), and a takeover proposal (substituting
40% for 15% in the definition of
takeover proposal in the merger agreement) for
Express Scripts is publicly disclosed prior to the date of
termination and the vote
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
seeking the Express Scripts stockholder approval had not been
taken prior to the seventh business day prior to the outside
date (as it may be extended); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to obtain the Express Scripts stockholder approval at
the Express Scripts special meeting, and a takeover proposal
(substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of takeover proposal) is publicly
disclosed prior to the date of the Express Scripts special
meeting.
|
If, within one year of a termination described in either of the
two previous bullets, Express Scripts enters into a definitive
agreement providing for, or otherwise consummates, a takeover
proposal (substituting 40% for 15% in
the definition of takeover proposal), then Express
Scripts will pay to Medco the full amount of the termination fee
less any amount of the termination fee and any expenses
previously paid.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Medcos
expenses or the full amount of the termination fee be paid more
than once, nor shall Medco be paid an aggregate amount pursuant
to the expense reimbursement and termination fee provisions of
the merger agreement in excess of the full amount of the
termination fee.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
(Page 141)
It is anticipated that the Express Scripts merger and the Medco
merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange described in
Section 351 of the Code. It is a condition to Medcos
obligation to complete the Medco merger that Medco receive a
written opinion of its counsel, Sullivan & Cromwell,
to the effect that the Express Scripts merger and the Medco
merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange described in
Section 351 of the Code. It is a condition to Express
Scripts obligation to complete the Express Scripts merger
that New Express Scripts receive an opinion of its counsel,
Skadden, to the effect that the Express Scripts merger and the
Medco merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange
described in Section 351 of the Code. If the Express
Scripts merger and the Medco merger, taken together, qualify as
an exchange described in Section 351, then:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders (as defined in the section entitled The
Mergers Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences beginning on page 141) of Express
Scripts common stock will not recognize gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the
exchange of Express Scripts common stock for New Express Scripts
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders of Medco common stock generally will recognize
gain, but not loss, on the exchange of Medco common stock for a
combination of New Express Scripts common stock and cash
(excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional shares)
equal to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the excess of (i) the sum of the fair market value of New
Express Scripts common stock received in the Medco merger and
the amount of cash received in the Medco merger over
(ii) the stockholders tax basis in the Medco common
stock surrendered in the Medco merger, and
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash received by such stockholder in the Medco
merger.
|
You are strongly urged to consult with a tax advisor to
determine the particular U.S. federal, state or local or
foreign income or other tax consequences of the mergers to you.
See The Mergers Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences on page 141.
Appraisal
Rights (Page 145)
Under Delaware law, holders of shares of Medco common stock that
meet certain requirements will have the right to obtain payment
in cash for the fair value of their shares of Medco common
stock, as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, rather
than the Medco merger consideration. To exercise appraisal
rights, Medco stockholders must strictly follow the procedures
prescribed by Delaware law. These procedures are summarized
under the section entitled The Mergers
Appraisal Rights beginning on page 145. In addition,
the text of the applicable appraisal rights provisions of
Delaware law is included as Annex H to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
28
Under Delaware law, holders of shares of Express Scripts common
stock will not have the right to obtain payment in cash for the
fair value of their shares of Express Scripts common stock, as
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, rather than the
Express Scripts merger consideration.
Listing
of New Express Scripts Common Stock on the NASDAQ
(Page 149)
New Express Scripts common stock received by Medco stockholders
in the Medco merger and Express Scripts stockholders in the
Express Scripts merger is expected to be listed on the NASDAQ
under the symbol ESRX. After completion of the
mergers, Medco common stock will no longer be listed or traded
on the NYSE.
Comparison
of Stockholder Rights (Page 192)
As a result of the mergers, the holders of Medco common stock
and Express Scripts common stock will become holders of New
Express Scripts common stock. Following the mergers, Medco
stockholders and Express Scripts stockholders will have
different rights as stockholders of New Express Scripts than
they had as stockholders of Medco and Express Scripts due to the
different provisions of the governing documents of Medco,
Express Scripts and New Express Scripts. For additional
information comparing the rights of stockholders of Medco,
Express Scripts and New Express Scripts, see Comparison of
Stockholder Rights beginning on page 192.
Litigation
Relating to the Mergers (Page 149)
Since the announcement by the parties on July 21, 2011 that
they had entered into the merger agreement, lawsuits have been
filed by purported stockholders of Medco challenging the
mergers. The complaints in the actions name as defendants Medco
and/or
various members of the Medco board as well as Express Scripts,
New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs.
The plaintiffs in the purported class action complaints
generally allege, among other things, that (i) the members
of the Medco board breached their fiduciary duties to Medco and
its stockholders by authorizing the mergers and
(ii) Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger
Subs aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by
Medco and its directors. The plaintiffs seek, among other
things, to enjoin the defendants from consummating the mergers
on the
agreed-upon
terms, and unspecified compensatory damages, together with the
costs and disbursements of the action. Further detail concerning
these lawsuits are set forth under the section entitled
The Mergers Litigation Relating to the
Mergers beginning on page 149.
29
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF EXPRESS
SCRIPTS
The following data, insofar as it relates to each of the years
2006-2010,
has been derived from annual financial statements, including the
consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009
and the related consolidated statements of income and of cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010 and notes thereto which are incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The data
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 has
been derived from unaudited financial statements which are also
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and which in the opinion of management,
include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for
the unaudited interim periods. The information set forth below
is only a summary and is not necessarily indicative of the
results of future operations of Express Scripts or the combined
company, and you should read the following information together
with Express Scripts audited consolidated financial
statements, the notes related thereto and the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in Express
Scripts Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, and Express
Scripts unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements, the notes related thereto and the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in Express
Scripts Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, which
are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. For more information, see the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 208.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009(1)
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2007(3)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(4)
|
|
$
|
34,026.9
|
|
|
$
|
33,679.0
|
|
|
$
|
44,973.2
|
|
|
$
|
24,722.3
|
|
|
$
|
21,941.2
|
|
|
$
|
21,788.9
|
|
|
$
|
21,532.1
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
|
985.4
|
|
|
|
875.0
|
|
|
|
1,204.6
|
|
|
|
826.6
|
|
|
|
775.9
|
|
|
|
598.0
|
|
|
|
473.1
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
985.4
|
|
|
|
851.6
|
|
|
|
1,181.2
|
|
|
|
827.6
|
|
|
|
776.1
|
|
|
|
567.8
|
|
|
|
474.4
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued operations
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
Discontinuing operations(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued operations
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
Discontinuing operations(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
|
Common stock dividends declared
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
506.1
|
|
|
|
541.9
|
|
|
|
538.5
|
|
|
|
527.0
|
|
|
|
497.8
|
|
|
|
520.8
|
|
|
|
559.2
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
510.3
|
|
|
|
547.5
|
|
|
|
544.0
|
|
|
|
532.2
|
|
|
|
503.6
|
|
|
|
528.0
|
|
|
|
568.0
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
10,871.7
|
|
|
$
|
10,194.7
|
|
|
$
|
10,557.8
|
|
|
$
|
11,931.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,509.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,256.4
|
|
|
$
|
5,108.1
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
999.9
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1,340.1
|
|
|
|
420.0
|
|
|
|
260.1
|
|
|
|
180.1
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,989.3
|
|
|
|
2,493.4
|
|
|
|
2,493.7
|
|
|
|
2,492.5
|
|
|
|
1,340.3
|
|
|
|
1,760.3
|
|
|
|
1,270.4
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
2,164.7
|
|
|
|
3,220.0
|
|
|
|
3,606.6
|
|
|
|
3,551.8
|
|
|
|
1,078.2
|
|
|
|
696.4
|
|
|
|
1,124.9
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the acquisition of certain subsidiaries of WellPoint
that provide pharmacy benefit management services
(NextRx) effective December 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes the acquisition of the Pharmacy Services Division of
MSC Medical Services Company (MSC)
effective July 22, 2008. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes the acquisition of ConnectYourCare (CYC)
effective October 10, 2007. |
30
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes retail pharmacy co-payments of $4,374.0 and $4,688.4
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively and $6,181.4, $3,132.1, $3,153.6, $3,554.5, and
$4,012.7 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively. We changed our accounting policy
for member co-payments during the third quarter of 2008 to
include member co-payments to retail pharmacies in revenue and
cost of revenue. The table reflects the change in our accounting
policy for all periods presented. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Earnings per share and weighted average shares outstanding have
been restated to reflect the
two-for-one
stock splits effective June 8, 2010 and June 22, 2007,
respectively. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Primarily consists of the results of operations from the
discontinued operations of Phoenix Marketing Group line of
business (PMG) and Infusion Pharmacy
(IP), which were classified as a discontinued
operation in the second quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter
of 2007, respectively. |
31
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF MEDCO
The following data, insofar as it relates to each of the years
2006-2010,
has been derived from annual financial statements, including the
consolidated balance sheets at December 25, 2010 and
December 26, 2009 and the related consolidated statements
of income and of cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 25, 2010 and notes thereto which are
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy/prospectus. The
data for the nine months ended September 24, 2011 and
September 25, 2010 has been derived from unaudited
financial statements which are incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy/prospectus and which in the opinion of management,
include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for
the unaudited interim periods. The information set forth below
is only a summary and is not necessarily indicative of the
results of future operations of Medco or the combined company,
and you should read the following information together with
Medcos audited consolidated financial statements, the
notes related thereto and the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in
Medcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 25, 2010, and Medcos
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the notes
related thereto and the section entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations contained in Medcos Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 24, 2011, which
are incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. For more information, see the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 208.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Fiscal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
As of and for the Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
September 24,
|
|
|
September 25,
|
|
|
December 25,
|
|
|
December 26,
|
|
|
December 27,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010(1)
|
|
|
2010(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2007(3)
|
|
|
2006(4)
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(5)
|
|
$
|
51,075.1
|
|
|
$
|
49,038.2
|
|
|
$
|
65,968.3
|
|
|
$
|
59,804.2
|
|
|
$
|
51,258.0
|
|
|
$
|
44,506.2
|
|
|
$
|
42,543.7
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,031.3
|
|
|
|
1,048.9
|
|
|
|
1,427.3
|
|
|
|
1,280.3
|
|
|
|
1,102.9
|
|
|
|
912.0
|
|
|
|
630.2
|
|
Basic earnings per share:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.33
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.66
|
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
Diluted earnings per share:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
$
|
2.28
|
|
|
$
|
3.16
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
Common stock dividends declared
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
397.0
|
|
|
|
450.2
|
|
|
|
443.0
|
|
|
|
481.1
|
|
|
|
508.6
|
|
|
|
550.2
|
|
|
|
594.5
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
404.7
|
|
|
|
459.3
|
|
|
|
451.8
|
|
|
|
490.0
|
|
|
|
518.6
|
|
|
|
560.9
|
|
|
|
603.3
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
15,863.6
|
|
|
$
|
16,570.2
|
|
|
$
|
17,097.3
|
|
|
$
|
17,915.5
|
|
|
$
|
17,010.9
|
|
|
$
|
16,217.9
|
|
|
$
|
14,388.1
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
|
|
600.0
|
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,000.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,002.2
|
|
|
|
5,004.8
|
|
|
|
5,003.6
|
|
|
|
4,000.1
|
|
|
|
4,002.9
|
|
|
|
2,894.4
|
|
|
|
866.4
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
3,550.4
|
|
|
|
4,454.0
|
|
|
|
3,986.8
|
|
|
|
6,387.2
|
|
|
|
5,957.9
|
|
|
|
6,875.3
|
|
|
|
7,503.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The consolidated data for 2010 includes the operating results of
United BioSource Corporation (UBC) commencing on the
September 16, 2010 acquisition date. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The consolidated data for 2008 includes the operating results of
Europa Apotheek Venlo B.V. (Europa Apotheek)
commencing on the April 28, 2008 acquisition date. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The consolidated data for 2007 includes the operating results of
PolyMedica Corporation (PolyMedica) and Critical
Care Systems, Inc. (Critical Care) commencing on the
October 31, 2007 and November 14, 2007 acquisition
dates, respectively. |
32
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The consolidated data for 2006 includes a pre-tax legal
settlements charge of $162.6 million recorded in the first
quarter of 2006, with a $99.9 million after-tax effect, or
$0.17 per diluted share on a split-adjusted basis (see note
(6) below). |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Includes retail co-payments of $6,908 and $6,966 in the first
nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively and
$9,241 million for 2010, $8,661 million for 2009,
$7,666 million for 2008, $7,553 million for 2007, and
$7,394 million for 2006. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Common share and per share amounts have been retrospectively
adjusted for the two-for-one stock split, which became effective
on January 24, 2008. |
33
SELECTED
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma statements of operations data
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 reflect the mergers of Medco by
Express Scripts as if they had occurred on the first day of each
period presented. The following unaudited pro forma balance
sheet data at September 30, 2011 reflect the mergers as if
they had occurred on September 30, 2011. Such pro forma
financial data is based on the historical financial statements
of Express Scripts and Medco and gives effect to the mergers of
Medco by Express Scripts under the acquisition method of
accounting for business combinations. The unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial information presented below and
throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus for the year
ended December 31, 2010 and as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 includes historical consolidated
financial information of Medco that has been derived from
Medcos historical consolidated financial statements for
the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010 and as of and for
the nine-month period ended September 24, 2011. As a
result, the pro forma financial information is based on certain
assumptions and adjustments as discussed in the section titled
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements, including assumptions relating to the
allocation of the consideration paid for the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed of Medco based on preliminary estimates of
their fair value. The following should be read in connection
with the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to
exchange entitled Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements, and other information included in or
incorporated by reference into this document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
84,853.3
|
|
|
$
|
110,675.3
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
1,290.1
|
|
|
|
1,504.2
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
827.7
|
|
|
|
897.3
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
838.1
|
|
|
|
910.0
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
224.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
52,657.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
18,759.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
17,555.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
Presented below are Express Scripts and Medcos
historical per share data for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31,
2010 and unaudited pro forma combined per share data for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended
December 31, 2010. This information should be read together
with the consolidated financial statements and related notes of
Express Scripts and Medco that are incorporated by reference in
this document and with the unaudited pro forma combined
financial data included under the Selected Unaudited Pro
Forma Combined Financial Information section of this
document. The pro forma information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of
the operating results or financial position that would have
occurred if the mergers had been completed as of the beginning
of the periods presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of
the future operating results or financial position of the
combined company. The historical book value per share is
computed by dividing total stockholders equity (deficit)
by the number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end
of the period. The pro forma earnings per share of the combined
company is computed by dividing the pro forma net income by the
pro forma weighted average number of shares outstanding. The pro
forma book value per share of the combined company is computed
by dividing total pro forma stockholders equity by the pro
forma number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of
the period. The Medco unaudited pro forma equivalent per share
financial information is computed by multiplying the Express
Scripts unaudited pro forma combined per share amounts by the
exchange ratio (0.81 shares of Express Scripts common stock
for each share of Medco common stock).
Neither Express Scripts nor Medco has paid dividends on common
stock during 2011 or 2010, and neither entity has any current
intention of doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Nine Month Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
2010 (Express
|
|
|
|
(Express Scripts)
|
|
|
Scripts) and
|
|
|
|
and September 24,
|
|
|
December 25,
|
|
|
|
2011 (Medco)
|
|
|
2010 (Medco)
|
|
|
Express Scripts historical data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
4.45
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
|
Medco historical data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
|
9.71
|
|
Express Scripts unaudited pro forma equivalent data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
21.95
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Medco unaudited pro forma equivalent data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
17.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE MARKET PRICE DATA AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Express Scripts common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the
symbol ESRX. Medco common stock is traded on the
NYSE under the symbol MHS. The following table sets
forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices
per share of Express Scripts common stock and Medco common stock
on the NASDAQ and NYSE, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock(1)
|
|
|
Medco Common Stock
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
58.77
|
|
|
$
|
50.91
|
|
|
$
|
65.39
|
|
|
$
|
51.80
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
60.89
|
|
|
|
52.27
|
|
|
|
64.92
|
|
|
|
53.11
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
57.47
|
|
|
|
37.06
|
|
|
|
66.38
|
|
|
|
47.78
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through November 10, 2011)
|
|
|
48.39
|
|
|
|
34.47
|
|
|
|
58.12
|
|
|
|
44.60
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
51.62
|
|
|
|
41.38
|
|
|
|
66.94
|
|
|
|
58.96
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
54.00
|
|
|
|
37.75
|
|
|
|
65.35
|
|
|
|
53.46
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
49.69
|
|
|
|
41.55
|
|
|
|
57.82
|
|
|
|
43.45
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
55.68
|
|
|
|
47.23
|
|
|
|
64.24
|
|
|
|
50.36
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
29.82
|
|
|
|
21.38
|
|
|
|
48.95
|
|
|
|
36.46
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
34.71
|
|
|
|
22.53
|
|
|
|
48.00
|
|
|
|
37.93
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
39.91
|
|
|
|
31.80
|
|
|
|
56.82
|
|
|
|
44.53
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
44.94
|
|
|
|
37.50
|
|
|
|
66.00
|
|
|
|
53.11
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prices of Express Scripts common stock adjusted to reflect
two-for-one
stock split effective June 8, 2010. |
Neither Express Scripts nor Medco has paid dividends on common
stock during 2011 or 2010, and neither entity has any current
intention of doing so.
36
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included in, or
incorporated by reference in, and found in the Annexes attached
to, this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters
addressed in Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 63, you
should carefully consider the risks described below before
deciding how to vote. You should also read and consider the risk
factors associated with each of the businesses of Express
Scripts and Medco because these risk factors may affect the
operations and financial results of the combined company. These
risk factors may be found under Part I, Item 1A in
each of Express Scripts Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Medcos
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 25, 2010 and Part II,
Item 1A in each of Express Scripts Quarterly Reports
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011
and Medcos Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 24, 2011 and June 25,
2011, each of which is on file with the SEC and all of which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Furthermore, you should read and consider the other information
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents
incorporated by reference herein. See Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 208 for the
location of information incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Additional risks and uncertainties
not presently known to Express Scripts or Medco or that are not
currently believed to be important also may adversely affect the
mergers and New Express Scripts following the mergers.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Mergers
Medco
and Express Scripts stockholders cannot be sure of the market
value of the shares of New Express Scripts common stock to be
issued upon completion of the mergers.
Express Scripts stockholders and Medco stockholders will receive
a fixed number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock in
the mergers rather than a number of shares with a particular
fixed market value. The market values of Express Scripts common
stock and Medco common stock at the time of the mergers may vary
significantly from their prices on the date the merger agreement
was executed, the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
or the date on which Express Scripts stockholders and Medco
stockholders vote on the mergers. Because the respective merger
consideration exchange ratios will not be adjusted to reflect
any changes in the market prices of Express Scripts common stock
or Medco common stock, the market value of the New Express
Scripts common stock issued in the mergers and the Express
Scripts common stock and Medco common stock surrendered in the
mergers may be higher or lower than the values of these shares
on earlier dates. 100% of the Express Scripts merger
consideration to be received by Express Scripts stockholders
will be New Express Scripts common stock. The percentage of the
value of the Medco merger consideration to be received by Medco
stockholders that is comprised of New Express Scripts common
stock may fluctuate, but was 60% on July 20, 2011, the last
full trading day prior to the announcement of the mergers, and
was approximately 57% on November 10, 2011, the latest
practicable date before the printing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Changes in the market prices of Express Scripts common stock and
Medco common stock may result from a variety of factors that are
beyond the control of Express Scripts or Medco, including
changes in their businesses, operations and prospects,
regulatory considerations, governmental actions, and legal
proceedings and developments. Market assessments of the benefits
of the mergers, the likelihood that the mergers will be
completed, the terms and mix of acquisition financing, and
general and industry-specific market and economic conditions may
also have an effect on the market price of Express Scripts
common stock and Medco common stock. Changes in market prices of
Medco common stock and Express Scripts common stock may also be
caused by fluctuations and developments affecting domestic and
global securities markets. Neither Express Scripts nor Medco is
permitted to terminate the merger agreement solely because of
changes in the market price of either partys respective
common stock.
In addition, it is anticipated that the mergers may not be
completed until a significant period of time has passed after
the special meetings. As a result, the market values of Express
Scripts common stock
and/or the
Medco common stock may vary significantly from the date of the
special meetings to the date of the
37
completion of the mergers. You are urged to obtain
up-to-date
prices for Express Scripts common stock and the Medco common
stock. There is no assurance that the mergers will be completed,
that there will not be a delay in the completion of the mergers
or that all or any of the anticipated benefits of the mergers
will be obtained. See Comparative Per Share Market Price
and Dividend Information for ranges of historic prices of
Express Scripts common stock and Medco common stock.
Obtaining
required regulatory approvals may prevent or delay completion of
the mergers or reduce the anticipated benefits of the mergers or
may require changes to the structure or terms of the
mergers.
Consummation of the mergers is conditioned upon, among other
things, the expiration or termination of the waiting period (and
any extensions thereof) applicable to the mergers under the HSR
Act. At any time before or after the mergers are consummated,
any of the DOJ, the FTC or U.S. state attorneys general
could take action under the antitrust laws in opposition to the
mergers, including seeking to enjoin completion of the mergers,
condition completion of the mergers upon the divestiture of
assets of Express Scripts, Medco or their subsidiaries or impose
restrictions on New Express Scripts post-merger
operations. These could negatively affect the results of
operations and financial condition of the combined company
following completion of the mergers. Any such requirements or
restrictions may prevent or delay completion of the mergers or
may reduce the anticipated benefits of the mergers, which could
also have a material adverse effect on the combined
companys business and cash flows, financial condition and
results of operations. Additionally, Express Scripts has agreed
to take certain actions, conditioned on the closing, and may
take other actions that Express Scripts determines in its sole
discretion to take, to the extent necessary to ensure
satisfaction, on or prior to the outside date (as it may be
extended), of certain conditions to the closing of the mergers
relating to regulatory approvals as further described in the
section titled The Mergers Governmental and
Regulatory Approvals beginning on page 139. Certain
of these actions may be taken after receipt of the approval of
the stockholders of each of Medco and Express Scripts and it is
not currently contemplated that any such stockholder approval
would be resolicited in the event that any of these actions are
taken after the special meetings.
Consummation of the mergers is also conditioned upon the receipt
of certain approvals from, and making filings with, the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain state
insurance departments relating to Express Scripts and
Medcos insurance company subsidiaries. The condition
relating to the receipt of certain approvals from, and making
filings with, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services and certain state insurance departments is deemed to be
satisfied, if it is not earlier satisfied, on the fifth business
day prior to the outside date, without giving effect to any
extension thereof. No assurance can be given that the required
regulatory approvals will be obtained or that the required
conditions to closing will be satisfied, and, even if all such
approvals are obtained and the conditions are satisfied, no
assurance can be given as to the terms, conditions and timing of
the approvals. See The Merger Agreement
Conditions to Completion of the Mergers for a discussion
of the conditions to the consummation of the mergers and
The Mergers Regulatory Approvals for a
discussion of the regulatory approvals required in connection
with the consummation of the mergers.
Failure
to successfully combine the businesses of Express Scripts and
Medco in the expected time frame may adversely affect New
Express Scripts future results.
The success of the mergers will depend, in part, on New Express
Scripts ability to realize the anticipated benefits from
combining the businesses of Express Scripts and Medco as further
described in the section titled The Mergers
Recommendation of the Express Scripts Board; Express
Scripts Reasons for the Mergers beginning on
page 105 and The Mergers Recommendation
of the Medco Board; Medcos Reasons for the Merger
beginning on page 86. To realize these anticipated
benefits, the businesses of Express Scripts and Medco must be
successfully combined. Historically, Express Scripts and Medco
have been independent companies, and they will continue to be
operated as such until the completion of the mergers. The
management of New Express Scripts may face significant
challenges in consolidating the functions of Medco and Express
Scripts, integrating the technologies, organizations,
procedures, policies and operations, as well as addressing the
different business cultures at the two companies, and retaining
key personnel. If the combined company is not successfully
integrated, the anticipated benefits of the mergers may not be
realized fully or at
38
all or may take longer to realize than expected. The integration
may also be complex and time consuming, and require substantial
resources and effort. The integration process and other
disruptions resulting from the mergers may also disrupt each
companys ongoing businesses
and/or
adversely affect our relationships with employees, regulators
and others with whom we have business or other dealings.
Express
Scripts and Medco will be subject to business uncertainties and
contractual restrictions while the mergers are
pending.
Uncertainty about the effect of the mergers on employees and
customers may have an adverse effect on Medco or Express Scripts
and consequently on the combined company. These uncertainties
may impair Medcos ability to retain and motivate key
personnel and could cause customers and others that deal with
Medco to defer entering into contracts with Medco or making
other decisions concerning Medco or seek to change existing
business relationships with Medco. Certain of Medcos
customer contracts contain change of control restrictions that
may give rise to a right of termination or cancellation in
connection with the mergers. In addition, if key employees
depart because of uncertainty about their future roles and the
potential complexities of the mergers, Medcos and Express
Scripts business could be harmed. In addition, the merger
agreement restricts Express Scripts and Medco from making
certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions until
the mergers occur without the consent of the other party. These
restrictions may prevent Express Scripts and Medco from pursuing
attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the
completion of the mergers. See the section entitled The
Merger Agreement Covenants and Agreements
beginning on page 161 for a description of the restrictive
covenants applicable to Express Scripts and Medco.
The
merger agreement limits Express Scripts and Medcos
ability to pursue alternatives to the mergers.
Each of Express Scripts and Medco has agreed that it will not
solicit, initiate, knowingly encourage or facilitate inquiries
or proposals or engage in discussions or negotiations regarding
takeover proposals, subject to limited exceptions, including
that a party may take certain actions in the event it receives
an unsolicited takeover proposal that constitutes a superior
proposal or is reasonably expected to lead to a superior
proposal, and the partys board of directors determines in
good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel,
that a failure to take action with respect to such takeover
proposal would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties. Each
party has also agreed that its board of directors will not
change its recommendation to its stockholders or approve any
alternative agreement, subject to limited exceptions, including
that, at any time prior to the applicable stockholder or member
approval, the applicable board of directors may make a change in
recommendation (i) in circumstances not involving or
relating to a takeover proposal, if such board concludes in good
faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that
the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with the
exercise of its fiduciary duties to its stockholders under
applicable laws; or (ii) in response to a superior
proposal, if such board of directors concludes that a failure to
change its recommendation would be inconsistent with the
exercise of its fiduciary duties to its stockholders under
applicable laws and, if requested by the other party, its
representatives shall have negotiated in good faith with the
other party for six business days (and in the case of any
material amendment or modification to such superior proposal,
for a period expiring upon the later to occur of three business
days and the end of such six business day period) regarding any
revisions to the terms of the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement proposed by the other party in response to such
superior proposal. The merger agreement also requires each party
to call, give notice of and hold a meeting of its stockholders
for the purposes of obtaining the applicable stockholder
approval. This special meeting requirement does not apply to a
party in the event that the merger agreement is terminated in
accordance with its terms. See The Merger
Agreement Stockholders Meeting and Duty to
Recommend. In addition, under specified circumstances,
Express Scripts or Medco may be required to pay a termination
fee of $950 million, $650 million or
$227.5 million (depending on the specific circumstances) if
the merger is not consummated. Express Scripts or Medco may also
be required to reimburse the other party for its expenses, up to
a maximum amount of either $225 million or
$100 million (depending on the specific circumstances), in
connection with the termination of the merger agreement. See the
section entitled The Merger Agreement
Termination Fees; Expenses beginning on page 178 for
a description of the circumstances under which such termination
fees and expense reimbursements are payable. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in no event shall either partys expenses or the
full amount
39
of the termination fee be paid to such party more than once,
nor shall either party be paid an aggregate amount pursuant to
the expense reimbursement and termination fee provisions of the
merger agreement in excess of the full amount of the termination
fee. In addition, upon adoption of the merger agreement by the
Express Scripts stockholders or the Medco stockholders at either
companys special meeting, the right of such adopting party
to terminate the merger agreement in response to a superior
proposal is eliminated. These provisions might discourage a
potential competing acquiror that might have an interest in
acquiring all or a significant part of Express Scripts or Medco
from considering or proposing an acquisition, even if it were
prepared to pay consideration with a higher price per share than
that proposed in the mergers, or might result in a potential
competing acquiror proposing to pay a lower price per share to
acquire Express Scripts or Medco than it might otherwise have
been willing to pay.
Certain
directors and executive officers of Express Scripts and Medco
may have interests in the mergers that are different from, or in
addition to or in conflict with, yours.
Executive officers of Express Scripts and Medco negotiated the
terms of the merger agreement and the boards of Express Scripts
and Medco approved the merger agreement and unanimously
recommend that you vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement. These directors and executive officers may
have interests in the mergers that are different from, or in
addition to or in conflict with, yours. These interests include
the continued employment of certain executive officers of
Express Scripts and Medco by New Express Scripts, the continued
positions of certain directors of Express Scripts and Medco as
directors of New Express Scripts, and the indemnification of
former Medco directors and Express Scripts and Medco officers by
New Express Scripts and the surviving corporations. With respect
to Medco directors and executive officers, these interests also
include the treatment in the Medco merger of employment
agreements,
change-of-control
severance agreements, restricted stock units, deferred stock
units, options and other rights held by these directors and
executive officers. You should be aware of these interests when
you consider your board of directors recommendation that
you vote in favor of the mergers. For a discussion of the
interests of directors and executive officers in the mergers,
see The Mergers Interests of Officers and
Directors in the Mergers.
The
shares of New Express Scripts common stock to be received by
Medco stockholders and Express Scripts stockholders as a result
of the mergers will have different rights from shares of Medco
common stock and Express Scripts common stock.
Following completion of the mergers, Medco stockholders and
Express Scripts stockholders will no longer be stockholders of
Medco and Express Scripts but will instead be stockholders of
New Express Scripts. There will be important differences between
your current rights as a Medco stockholder or Express Scripts
stockholder and your rights as a New Express Scripts
stockholder. See Comparison of Stockholder Rights
for a discussion of the different rights associated with Express
Scripts common stock and Medco common stock.
Both
Express Scripts stockholders and Medco stockholders will have a
reduced ownership and voting interest after the mergers and will
exercise less influence over management.
After the completion of the mergers, the Express Scripts
stockholders and Medco stockholders will own a smaller
percentage of New Express Scripts than they currently own of
Express Scripts and Medco, respectively. Upon completion of the
mergers, it is anticipated that Express Scripts stockholders, on
the one hand, and Medco stockholders, on the other hand, will
hold approximately 59% and 41%, respectively, of the shares of
common stock of New Express Scripts issued and outstanding
immediately after the consummation of the mergers. Consequently,
Express Scripts stockholders, as a group, and Medco
stockholders, as a group, will each have reduced ownership and
voting power in the combined company compared to their ownership
and voting power in Express Scripts and Medco, respectively. In
particular, Medco stockholders, as a group, will have less than
a majority of the ownership and voting power of New Express
Scripts and, therefore, will be able to exercise less collective
influence over the management and policies of New Express
Scripts than they currently exercise over the management and
policies of Medco.
40
Failure
to complete the mergers could negatively impact the stock
prices, businesses and financial results of Express Scripts and
Medco.
If the mergers are not completed, the ongoing businesses of
Express Scripts and Medco may be adversely affected and Express
Scripts and Medco will be subject to several risks and
consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Medco may be required, under certain circumstances, to pay
Express Scripts a termination fee of $950 million,
$650 million or $227.5 million (depending on the
specific circumstances). Medco may also be required, under
certain circumstances, to pay the out of pocket expenses of
Express Scripts up to a maximum amount of either
$100 million or $225 million (depending on the
specific circumstances) under the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Express
Scripts expenses or the full amount of the termination fee
be paid more than once, nor shall Express Scripts be paid an
aggregate amount pursuant to the expense reimbursement and
termination fee provisions of the merger agreement in excess of
the full amount of the termination fee;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts may be required, under certain circumstances, to
pay Medco a termination fee of $950 million,
$650 million or $227.5 million (depending on the
specific circumstances). Express Scripts may also be required,
under certain circumstances, to pay the out of pocket expenses
of Medco up to a maximum amount of either $100 million or
$225 million (depending on the specific circumstances).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Medcos
expenses or the full amount of the termination fee be paid more
than once, nor shall Medco be paid an aggregate amount pursuant
to the expense reimbursement and termination fee provisions of
the merger agreement in excess of the full amount of the
termination fee;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medco and Express Scripts will be required to pay certain costs
relating to the mergers, whether or not the mergers are
completed, such as significant fees and expenses relating to
financing arrangements and legal, accounting, financial advisor
and printing fees;
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts may be required to pay significant fees and
expenses relating to financing arrangements, whether or not the
mergers are completed, which may include investment banking fees
and commissions, commitment fees, early termination or
redemption premiums, interest on debt financing between the date
of incurrence and the date of repayment, professional fees and
other costs and expenses;
|
|
|
|
under the merger agreement, each of Express Scripts and Medco is
subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of its business
prior to completing the mergers which may adversely affect its
ability to execute certain of its business strategies; and
|
|
|
|
matters relating to the mergers may require substantial
commitments of time and resources by Express Scripts and Medco
management, which could otherwise have been devoted to other
opportunities that may have been beneficial to Express Scripts
and Medco as independent companies, as the case may be.
|
In addition, if the mergers are not completed, Express Scripts
and/or Medco
may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and
from their respective customers and employees. Express Scripts
and Medco also could be subject to litigation related to a
failure to complete the mergers or to enforce their respective
obligations under the merger agreement. If the mergers are not
consummated, Express Scripts and Medco cannot assure their
respective stockholders that the risks described will not
materially affect the business, financial results and stock
prices of Express Scripts
and/or Medco.
Express
Scripts inability to satisfy and comply with conditions
under its existing financing arrangements or raise additional or
replacement financing could delay or prevent the completion of
the mergers.
New Express Scripts, Express Scripts and the Merger
Subs obligations under the merger agreement are not
subject to any conditions regarding their ability to finance, or
obtain financing, for the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, and they are obligated under the merger
agreement to have sufficient funds available to satisfy their
obligations under the merger agreement.
41
In addition to cash on hand, Express Scripts must raise a
substantial amount of capital from third party sources to
finance the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
This financing may take any of several forms or any combination
of them, including but not limited to the following:
(i) Express Scripts may draw funds under the bridge
facility; (ii) Express Scripts may issue senior notes in
the public
and/or
private capital markets which would reduce availability of the
bridge facility; and (iii) Express Scripts intends to
borrow $4.0 billion under the term facility. See
Description of Financing beginning on page 184.
The bridge credit agreement and the term/revolving credit
agreement contain customary conditions to funding and require
Express Scripts to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage
ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.5
to 1.0. There is a risk that these conditions or covenants will
not be satisfied or complied with, as applicable, on a timely
basis or at all. There is also a risk that one or more members
of the lending syndicate will default on its obligations to
provide its committed portion of the financing (and the
commitments of any defaulting syndicate member cannot be
replaced on a timely basis). There are a number of risks and
uncertainties associated with the execution of a capital markets
financing, particularly in light of recent volatility in the
capital markets and economic factors affecting U.S. and
global economies. All of these risks are magnified given the
scale of financing required to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. Any failure of Express
Scripts to satisfy and comply with conditions under its existing
financing arrangements or raise additional or replacement
financing could delay or impede the closing of the mergers.
Following
consummation of the mergers, the credit rating of Express
Scripts and/or Medco could be downgraded, which may increase its
borrowing costs and could give rise to an obligation to redeem
existing indebtedness.
We currently anticipate that following the closing of the
mergers, all eligible domestic subsidiaries of New Express
Scripts will guarantee the indebtedness of New Express Scripts.
By virtue of the transaction structure whereby Medco and Express
Scripts will become wholly owned subsidiaries of New Express
Scripts, absent further action, this would result in incremental
debt at both Express Scripts (and its consolidated guarantor
subsidiaries) and Medco (and its consolidated guarantor
subsidiaries). New Express Scripts also expects to add its
guarantee to the existing Express Scripts debt and Medco debt,
such that substantially all outstanding indebtedness of New
Express Scripts, Express Scripts and Medco would, as a credit
matter, have the benefit of the earnings and credit support of
the combined company. New Express Scripts will by reason of the
debt incurred to finance the Medco merger consideration have
considerably higher aggregate levels of indebtedness than
Express Scripts and Medco currently have in the aggregate, and
there can be no assurance that the credit ratings of the
existing Express Scripts debt or Medco debt will not be subject
to a downgrade below investment grade. On July 21, 2011,
Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and Standard &
Poors Rating Services assigned credit ratings of Baa3 and
BBB+, respectively, to Express Scripts. On July 25, 2011,
Fitch Ratings assigned a credit rating of BBB to Express
Scripts. On July 25, 2011, Fitch Ratings assigned a credit
rating of BBB to Medco.
In the event that the notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$4.0 billion issued by Express Scripts under the indenture
dated June 9, 2009, which we refer to as the Express
indenture, receive a below investment grade rating from each of
Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and Standard &
Poors Rating Services and such downgrade constitutes a
below investment grade rating event (as defined in
the Express indenture) during the period continuing until
60 days after consummation of the mergers (subject to
extension if the rating of the notes is under publicly announced
consideration for possible downgrade by either of such rating
agencies), each holder of the notes would have the right to
require Express Scripts to repurchase all or part of such
holders notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount of the notes repurchased, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the notes repurchased,
to the date of purchase and Express Scripts would likely be
required to refinance such indebtedness. Additionally, in the
event that the notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$2.5 billion issued by Medco under the indenture dated
March 18, 2008, which we refer to as the Medco indenture,
are rated below their investment grade rating by each of
Moodys Investors Service, Inc., Fitch Ratings and
Standard & Poors Rating Services and such
downgrade constitutes a below investment grade rating
event (as defined in the Medco indenture) on the
60th day
42
(subject to extension if the rating of the notes is under
publicly announced consideration for possible downgrade by any
such rating agency) following the Medco merger, then Medco would
be required to offer to repurchase its notes at a repurchase
price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes
repurchased, plus accrued but unpaid interest. Any such
obligation to offer to repurchase outstanding Express Scripts or
Medco indebtedness, or both, could necessitate obtaining
significant amounts of refinancing capital. No assurance can be
given as to the terms or availability of refinancing capital.
Any such obligation could have an adverse effect on New Express
Scripts financial condition. Moreover, if a ratings
downgrade were to occur or New Express Scripts fails to obtain
an investment grade rating, even if such event does not give
rise to a redemption obligation, the combined company could
experience higher borrowing costs in the future and more
restrictive covenants which would reduce profitability and
diminish operational flexibility.
Express
Scripts, Medco and New Express Scripts will incur significant
transaction and merger-related transition costs in connection
with the mergers.
Express Scripts and Medco expect that they and New Express
Scripts will incur significant, non-recurring costs in
connection with consummating the mergers and integrating the
operations of the two companies. Express Scripts and Medco may
incur additional costs to maintain employee morale and to retain
key employees. Express Scripts and Medco will also incur
significant fees and expenses relating to financing arrangements
and legal, accounting and other transaction fees and other costs
associated with the mergers. Some of these costs are payable
regardless of whether the mergers are completed. Moreover, under
specified circumstances, Express Scripts or Medco may be
required to pay a termination fee of $950 million,
$650 million or $227.5 million (depending on the
specific circumstances) if the merger is not consummated.
Express Scripts or Medco may also be required to reimburse the
other party for its expenses, up to a maximum amount of either
$225 million or $100 million (depending on the
specific circumstances), in connection with the termination of
the merger agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event
shall either partys expenses or the full amount of the
termination fee be paid to such party more than once, nor shall
either party be paid an aggregate amount pursuant to the expense
reimbursement and termination fee provisions of the merger
agreement in excess of the full amount of the termination fee.
See The Merger Agreement Termination Fees;
Expenses beginning on page 178.
The
unaudited pro forma financial information included in this
document may not be indicative of what New Express Scripts
actual financial position or results of operations would have
been.
The unaudited pro forma financial information in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus is presented for illustrative
purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what New
Express Scripts actual financial position or results of
operations would have been had the mergers been completed on the
dates indicated. The unaudited pro forma financial information
reflects adjustments, which are based upon preliminary
estimates, to allocate the purchase price to Medcos net
assets. The purchase price allocation reflected in this document
is preliminary, and final allocation of the purchase price will
be based upon the actual purchase price and the fair value of
the assets and liabilities of Medco as of the date of the
completion of the mergers. In addition, subsequent to the
closing date, there may be further refinements of the purchase
price allocation as additional information becomes available.
Accordingly, the final purchase accounting adjustments may
differ materially from the pro forma adjustments reflected in
this document. See Express Scripts and Medco Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information for more
information.
Several
lawsuits have been filed against Medco, members of the Medco
board, Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs
challenging the mergers, and an adverse ruling in such lawsuits
may prevent the mergers from becoming effective or from becoming
effective within the expected timeframe.
Medco, members of the Medco board, Express Scripts, New Express
Scripts and the Merger Subs are named as defendants in lawsuits
brought by and on behalf of Medco stockholders challenging the
mergers, seeking, among other things, to enjoin the defendants
from completing the mergers on the
agreed-upon
terms. See The Mergers Litigation Relating to
the Mergers for more information about these lawsuits.
43
One of the conditions to the closing of the mergers is that no
order has been enforced, enacted or issued or is applicable to
the mergers or other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement by any governmental entity which prohibits, restrains
or makes illegal the consummation of the mergers or other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. As such, if
the plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction
prohibiting the defendants from completing the mergers on the
agreed upon terms, then such injunction may prevent the mergers
from becoming effective, or from becoming effective within the
expected timeframe.
Express
Scripts, Medco and, subsequently, the combined company must
continue to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other
key employees, which may be difficult in light of uncertainty
regarding the mergers, and failure to do so could negatively
affect the combined company.
For the mergers to be successful, during the period before the
merger is completed, both Express Scripts and Medco must
continue to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other
key employees. Moreover, the combined company must be successful
at retaining and motivating key employees following the
completion of the mergers. Experienced employees in the
industries in which Express Scripts and Medco operate are in
high demand and competition for their talents can be intense.
Employees of both Express Scripts and Medco may experience
uncertainty about their future role with the combined company
until, or even after, strategies with regard to the combined
company are announced or executed. The potential distractions of
the mergers may adversely affect the ability of Express Scripts,
Medco or, following completion of the mergers, the combined
company, to retain, motivate and recruit executives and other
key employees and keep them focused on applicable strategies and
goals. A failure by Express Scripts, Medco or, following the
completion of the mergers, the combined company, to attract,
retain and motivate executives and other key employees during
the period prior to or after the completion of the mergers could
have a negative impact on the business of Express Scripts, Medco
or the combined company.
Risk
Factors Relating to New Express Scripts after Completion of the
Mergers
New
Express Scripts will face intense competition in the pharmacy
benefits management business.
New Express Scripts will operate in a very competitive industry,
and competition could compress its margins and impair its
ability to attract and retain clients. New Express Scripts
failure to differentiate its products and services in the
marketplace could magnify the impact of the competitive
environment.
New Express Scripts will operate in an industry that is subject
to significant market pressures brought about by customer
demands, legislative and regulatory activity and other market
factors. Competition in the marketplace has caused many pharmacy
benefit management companies, which we refer to as PBMs, to
reduce the prices charged to clients for core services and share
a larger portion of rebates, formulary fees and related revenues
received from pharmaceutical manufacturers with clients. This
combination of lower pricing and increased revenue sharing, as
well as increased demand for enhanced service offerings and
higher service levels, puts pressure on operating margins, which
have historically been offset by a variety of positive trends
including lower drug purchasing costs, increased generic usage,
drug price inflation and increased rebates. New Express
Scripts failure or inability to maintain these positive
trends, or identify and implement new ways to mitigate pricing
pressures, could negatively impact its ability to attract or
retain clients, or negatively impact its margins.
We believe the entities that will become the combined
companys clients upon closing are well informed and
organized and can easily move between New Express Scripts and
its competitors. These factors together with the impact of the
competitive marketplace may make it difficult for New Express
Scripts to retain existing clients, sell to new clients and
cross-sell additional services to clients, which could
materially adversely affect New Express Scripts business
and financial results. This requires New Express Scripts to
differentiate its business offerings by innovating and
delivering products and services that demonstrate value to New
Express Scripts clients, particularly in response to
market changes from public policy. Further, the reputational
impact of a service-related event, or New Express Scripts
failure to innovate and deliver products
44
and services that demonstrate value to its clients, may affect
New Express Scripts ability to retain or grow profitable
clients which could have a material adverse effect on its
financial results.
Government
regulatory efforts, including efforts to reduce healthcare costs
and alter healthcare financing practices, could lead to a
decreased demand for New Express Scripts services or to
reduced profitability.
During the past several years, the U.S. healthcare industry
has been subject to an increase in governmental regulation at
both the federal and state levels. Future governmental
regulation could, directly or indirectly, have adverse
consequences on the business and operations of New Express
Scripts which are impossible to predict at present. Efforts to
control healthcare costs, including prescription drug costs, are
underway at the federal and state government levels. There have
also been a number of recent proposals and enactments by the
federal government and various states to reduce Medicare
Part D and Medicaid reimbursement levels in response to
budget problems. We expect other similar proposals in the
future. Government efforts to reduce healthcare costs and alter
healthcare financing practices could lead to a decreased demand
for New Express Scripts services or to reduced
profitability.
Adverse
economic conditions could adversely affect New Express
Scripts earnings and New Express Scripts results of
operations.
The continuing, prolonged recessionary U.S. economic
environment may continue to impact demand for, and utilization
under, certain of New Express Scripts products and
services, and New Express Scripts profitability with
respect to such products and services. Adverse economic
conditions have caused and could continue to cause employers to
stop offering prescription benefit coverage as an employee
benefit or elect to offer this coverage on a voluntary,
employee-funded basis, or with higher member co-pays, as a means
to reduce their operating costs. Together with higher
unemployment and significant employment layoffs and downsizings,
these conditions could lead to a loss of members and cause a
reduction in utilization for New Express Scripts services.
In addition, continued difficult economic conditions have caused
and could continue to cause members to be unwilling or unable to
spend the money necessary to have prescriptions filled or
refilled as prescribed, which trend is exacerbated when plan
sponsors move to plan designs with higher member co-pays.
Further, lower volumes result in diseconomies of scale which
reduce New Express Scripts profitability under certain
products and services. As a result, New Express Scripts
volumes, earnings, profitability and cash flows may decline.
Express
Scripts and Medco are involved in arrangements with third
parties that may restrict Express Scripts and
Medcos, and subsequently New Express Scripts,
ability to sell, market, promote and develop products in certain
markets.
Express Scripts and Medco are each party to numerous
co-promotion, development, licensing and other agreements and
arrangements with third parties, some of which may contain
provisions limiting Express Scripts or Medcos
ability to sell, market, promote
and/or
develop products in specified markets. Following the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, products previously marketed by either Express
Scripts or Medco may become subject to these restrictions by
virtue of the combination of the two companies under New Express
Scripts. If it is determined that any of New Express
Scripts products are subject to these restrictions, New
Express Scripts may be required to divest, license or otherwise
cease marketing these products in various geographic
territories, potentially worldwide, and may or may not be
entitled to retain passive revenue in connection with actions
taken to comply with any such restriction. In the event any
product captured by these restrictions as a result of the
mergers contributes significantly to sales, the divesture of
rights to market the product could have an adverse effect on New
Express Scripts business, cash flows, results of
operations, financial position and prospects.
45
New
Express Scripts will have considerably higher levels of
indebtedness than Express Scripts and Medco currently have,
which will likely result in higher relative debt service costs
and less cash flow from operations available to fund growth,
stock repurchases and other corporate purposes.
The indebtedness of Express Scripts and Medco was approximately
$4.0 billion for Express Scripts as of September 30,
2011 and approximately $5.0 billion for Medco as of
September 24, 2011. Although the financing mix for the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement has not yet
been determined, assuming such transactions are funded with
$14.0 billion of new indebtedness, the combined company
would have had pro forma indebtedness as of September 30,
2011, of approximately $19.8 billion.
Upon completion of the mergers, New Express Scripts will have
incurred acquisition debt financing of up to $14.0 billion.
On August 5, 2011, Express Scripts entered into a
$14.0 billion unsecured bridge term loan facility. Prior to
the consummation of the Express Scripts merger, Express Scripts
is the borrower under the bridge facility. New Express Scripts
will assume the role, rights and obligations of Express Scripts
and become the borrower under the bridge credit agreement upon
consummation of the Express Scripts merger. The bridge facility
will be available for Express Scripts to pay a portion of the
cash consideration in accordance with the merger agreement, to
repay any existing indebtedness that will become due or
otherwise default upon consummation of the mergers, and to pay
related fees and expenses. On August 29, 2011, Express
Scripts entered into a $5.5 billion permanent facility
consisting of a five-year $4.0 billion term loan facility
and a five-year $1.5 billion revolving loan facility. Prior
to the consummation of the Express Scripts merger, Express
Scripts is the borrower under the permanent facility. New
Express Scripts will assume the role, rights and obligations of
Express Scripts and become the borrower under the term/revolving
credit agreement upon consummation of the Express Scripts
merger. The term facility will be available for Express Scripts
to pay a portion of the cash consideration in accordance with
the merger agreement, to repay any existing indebtedness that
will become due or otherwise default upon consummation of the
mergers and to pay related fees and expenses. The revolving
facility will be available for working capital needs and general
corporate purposes. Upon entry into the term facility, the
commitments under the bridge facility were automatically reduced
by $4.0 billion.
This level of indebtedness will:
|
|
|
|
|
require New Express Scripts to dedicate a greater percentage
(compared with Medco and Express Scripts on a stand-alone basis)
of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt,
thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund capital
expenditures, pursue other acquisitions or investments in new
technologies, make stock repurchases, pay dividends and for
general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
increase New Express Scripts vulnerability to general
adverse economic conditions, including increases in interest
rates if the borrowings bear interest at variable rates or if
such indebtedness is refinanced at a time when interest rates
are higher; and
|
|
|
|
limit New Express Scripts flexibility in planning for, or
reacting to, changes in or challenges relating to its business
and industry.
|
The covenants to which Express Scripts or New Express Scripts
has agreed or may agree in connection with the financing, and
New Express Scripts potential indebtedness and higher
debt-to-equity
ratio in comparison to that of Express Scripts or Medco on a
recent historical basis, may have the effect, among other
things, of restricting New Express Scripts financial and
operating flexibility to respond to changing business and
economic conditions, creating competitive disadvantages compared
to other competitors with lower debt levels and increasing
borrowing costs.
The
market price for shares of New Express Scripts common stock may
be affected by factors different from those affecting the market
price for shares of Medco common stock and Express Scripts
common stock.
Upon completion of the Medco merger, holders of Medco common
stock and Express Scripts common stock will become holders of
New Express Scripts common stock. Express Scripts business
differs from that
46
of Medco, and accordingly the results of operations of the
combined company will be affected by factors different from
those currently affecting the results of operations of Medco and
Express Scripts. For a discussion of the businesses of Express
Scripts and Medco and of certain factors to consider in
connection with those businesses, see the documents incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
referred to under the section entitled Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 208.
Government
investigations involving Express Scripts or Medco, or New
Express Scripts after completion of the mergers, could lead to
the commencement of civil and/or criminal proceedings involving
the imposition of substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or
administrative remedies, including exclusion from government
reimbursement programs, which could give rise to other
investigations or litigation by government entities or private
parties.
We cannot predict whether future or pending investigations to
which Express Scripts or Medco, or New Express Scripts after
completion of the mergers, may become subject would lead to a
judgment or settlement involving a significant monetary award or
restrictions on its operations. The pricing, sales and marketing
programs and arrangements and related business practices of
Express Scripts, Medco and other participants in the health care
industry are under increasing scrutiny from federal and state
regulatory, investigative, prosecutorial and administrative
entities. These entities include the Department of Justice and
its U.S. Attorneys Offices, the Office of Inspector
General of the Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA,
the Federal Trade Commission and various state Attorneys General
offices. Many of the health care laws under which certain of
these governmental entities operate, including the federal and
state anti-kickback statutes and statutory and common law false
claims laws, have been construed broadly by the courts and
permit the government entities to exercise significant
discretion. In the event that any of those governmental entities
believes that wrongdoing has occurred, one or more of them could
institute civil or criminal proceedings which, if resolved
unfavorably, could subject Express Scripts or Medco, or New
Express Scripts after completion of the mergers, to substantial
fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies,
including exclusion from government reimbursement programs. In
addition, an adverse outcome to a government investigation could
prompt other government entities to commence investigations of
Express Scripts or Medco, or, after completion of the mergers,
New Express Scripts, or cause those entities or private parties
to bring civil claims against it. We also cannot predict whether
any investigations will affect marketing practices or sales. Any
such result could have a material adverse impact on Express
Scripts or Medcos, or New Express Scripts
after completion of the mergers, results of operations, cash
flows, financial condition or business.
Regardless of the merits or outcomes of any investigation,
government investigations are costly, divert managements
attention from our business and may result in substantial damage
to our reputation. For additional information about these
investigations, see the respective reports of Medco and Express
Scripts described under Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 208.
Pending
and future litigation or other proceedings could subject New
Express Scripts to significant monetary damages or penalties
and/or require New Express Scripts to change its business
practices, either of which could have a material adverse effect
on the business operations and future financial results or
condition of New Express Scripts.
New Express Scripts will be subject to risks relating to
litigation, regulatory proceedings and other similar actions in
connection with its business operations, including the
dispensing of pharmaceutical products by its home delivery
pharmacies, services rendered in connection with its disease
management offerings and its pharmaceutical services operations.
Following the mergers, New Express Scripts could be liable for
those proceedings pending against Express Scripts or Medco as
disclosed in Express Scripts Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Medcos
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 25, 2010 and in each of Express
Scripts Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and June 30,
2011 and Medcos Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 24, 2011 and June 25,
2011, each of which is on file with the SEC and all of which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
If one or more of these proceedings has an unfavorable outcome,
New Express Scripts cannot provide any assurance that it would
not have a material
47
adverse effect on its business and financial results, including
its ability to attract and retain clients as a result of the
negative reputational impact of such an outcome. Further, while
certain costs are covered by insurance, New Express Scripts may
incur uninsured costs that are material to its financial
performance in the defense of such proceedings.
There
are other legal matters in which adverse outcomes could
negatively affect New Express Scripts results of
operations, cash flows, financial condition or
business.
Unfavorable outcomes in other pending litigation matters, or in
future litigation, including litigation concerning product
pricing, securities law violations, product liability claims,
matters relating to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (which we refer to as ERISA), patent and
intellectual property disputes, and antitrust matters could
preclude the commercialization of products, negatively affect
the profitability of existing products and subject New Express
Scripts to substantial fines, penalties and injunctive or
administrative remedies, including exclusion from government
reimbursement programs. Any such result could materially and
adversely affect New Express Scripts results of
operations, cash flows, financial condition or business.
Further, aggressive plaintiffs counsel often file litigation on
a wide variety of allegations whenever there is media attention
or negative discussion about the efficacy or safety of a product
and whenever the stock price is volatile; even when the
allegations are groundless, we may need to expend considerable
funds and other resources to respond to such litigation. For
further information on material legal matters facing Express
Scripts and Medco see the reports described under Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on page 208.
Changes
in laws and regulations could adversely affect our business and
the business of New Express Scripts.
All aspects of our respective businesses, and consequently the
business of New Express Scripts, including pharmacy benefits
management, manufacturing, marketing, pricing, sales, litigation
and intellectual property rights are, or in the case of New
Express Scripts, will be, subject to extensive legislation and
regulation. Changes in applicable federal and state laws and
agency regulations, as well as the laws and regulations of
foreign jurisdictions, could have a material adverse effect on
our respective businesses, and consequently the business of New
Express Scripts.
Additional
Risks Relating to Express Scripts, Medco and New Express Scripts
after the mergers.
Express Scripts and Medcos businesses are, and will
continue to be, subject to the risks described in
(i) Part I, Item 1A in Express Scripts
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010,
(ii) Part I, Item 1A in Medcos Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 25, 2010,
(iii) Part II, Item 1A in Express Scripts
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 30, 2011 and June 30,
2011, (iv) Part II, Item 1A in Medcos
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended September 24, 2011 and June 25,
2011 and (v) Exhibit 99.1 to Medcos Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 21, 2011, in each case, as filed with the SEC
and incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 208 for the location of
information incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
48
EXPRESS
SCRIPTS AND MEDCO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
presented below is derived from the historical financial
statements of Express Scripts and Medco, adjusted to give effect
to the mergers. For a summary of the mergers, see the section of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled The
Mergers.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
for the year ended December 31, 2010 give effect to the
mergers as if they had occurred on the first day of the earliest
period presented. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
balance sheet gives effect to the mergers as if they had
occurred on September 30, 2011.
The pro forma adjustments are preliminary and have been made
solely for informational purposes. The actual results reported
by the combined company in periods following the mergers may
differ significantly from that reflected in these pro forma
financial statements for a number of reasons, including but not
limited to cost savings from operating efficiencies, synergies
and the impact of the incremental costs incurred in integrating
the two companies. As a result, the pro forma information is not
intended to represent and is not necessarily indicative of what
the combined companys financial condition or results of
operations would have been had the mergers been completed on the
applicable dates of this pro forma financial information. In
addition, the pro forma financial information does not purport
to project the future financial condition and results of
operations of the combined company.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
is based upon the historical financial statements of Express
Scripts and Medco. The pro forma financial statements are based
on various assumptions, including assumptions relating to the
consideration paid and the allocation thereof to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed from Medco based on preliminary
estimates of fair value. The pro forma assumptions and
adjustments are described in the accompanying notes presented on
the following pages. Pro forma adjustments are those that are
directly attributable to the transaction, are factually
supportable and, with respect to the unaudited pro forma
statement of operations, are expected to have a continuing
impact on the consolidated results. The final purchase price and
the allocation thereof will differ from that reflected in the
pro forma financial statements after final valuation procedures
are performed and amounts are finalized following the completion
of the mergers.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
does not reflect any cost savings from operating efficiencies,
synergies or other restructurings that could result from the
mergers.
49
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Scripts
|
|
|
Medco
|
|
|
for Consistent
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
September 24, 2011
|
|
|
Presentation(1)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,062.6
|
|
|
$
|
161.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,000
|
.0
|
)(A)
|
|
$
|
224.1
|
|
Restricted cash and investments
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
1,770.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,270.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,041.2
|
|
Manufacturer accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859.8
|
|
|
|
(1,859.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,410.7
|
|
|
|
(2,410.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
340.2
|
|
|
|
788.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128.3
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
266.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311.9
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
.7
|
)(B)
|
|
|
134.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,306.4
|
|
|
|
5,562.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,003
|
.7
|
)
|
|
|
7,864.7
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
388.8
|
|
|
|
1,027.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
1,415.9
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,485.4
|
|
|
|
6,957.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,318
|
.6
|
(D)
|
|
|
29,761.7
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,665.8
|
|
|
|
2,214.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,618
|
.3
|
(D)
|
|
|
13,498.5
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
102.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
.4
|
)(B)
|
|
|
116.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,871.7
|
|
|
$
|
15,863.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,921
|
.8
|
|
|
$
|
52,657.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims and rebates payable
|
|
$
|
2,710.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,156.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,866.9
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
744.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750.6
|
|
Claims and other accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,960.5
|
|
|
|
(2,960.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client rebates and guarantees payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,201.8
|
|
|
|
(2,201.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
688.6
|
|
|
|
940.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,628.6
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
999.9
|
|
|
|
2,000.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
.0
|
) (B)
|
|
|
999.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
5,143.7
|
|
|
|
8,138.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
.0
|
)
|
|
|
11,282.4
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,989.3
|
|
|
|
3,002.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,768
|
.1
|
(B)
|
|
|
18,759.6
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
972.2
|
|
|
|
(972.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
574.0
|
|
|
|
200.1
|
|
|
|
972.2
|
|
|
|
3,313
|
.3
|
(E)
|
|
|
5,059.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
8,707.0
|
|
|
|
12,313.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,081
|
.4
|
|
|
|
35,101.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
.1
|
)(F)
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,422.5
|
|
|
|
8,760.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,778
|
.9
|
(F)
|
|
|
17,961.4
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
(31.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.6
|
(F)
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
6,355.2
|
|
|
|
7,668.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,819
|
.9
|
)(F)
|
|
|
6,203.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,800.2
|
|
|
|
16,403.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,012
|
.5
|
)
|
|
|
24,191.0
|
|
Common stock in treasury at cost
|
|
|
(6,635.5
|
)
|
|
|
(12,852.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,852
|
.9
|
(F)
|
|
|
(6,635.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,164.7
|
|
|
|
3,550.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,840
|
.4
|
|
|
|
17,555.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
10,871.7
|
|
|
$
|
15,863.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,921
|
.8
|
|
|
$
|
52,657.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 1 Basis of Presentation for
explanation of reclassifications. |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements
50
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Scripts
|
|
|
Medco
|
|
|
for Consistent
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
September 24, 2011
|
|
|
Presentation(1)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
34,026.9
|
|
|
$
|
51,075.1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(248.7
|
)(G)
|
|
$
|
84,853.3
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
31,661.5
|
|
|
|
47,732.4
|
|
|
|
(76.9
|
)
|
|
|
(248.7
|
)(G)
|
|
|
79,068.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,365.4
|
|
|
|
3,342.7
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,785.0
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
628.6
|
|
|
|
1,263.0
|
|
|
|
296.5
|
|
|
|
894.4
|
(H)
|
|
|
3,082.5
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219.6
|
|
|
|
(219.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,736.8
|
|
|
|
1,860.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(894.4
|
)
|
|
|
2,702.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other income (expense)
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(184.3
|
)
|
|
|
(156.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280.9
|
)(I)
|
|
|
(621.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176.5
|
)
|
|
|
(158.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280.9
|
)
|
|
|
(615.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,560.3
|
|
|
|
1,702.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,175.3
|
)
|
|
|
2,087.0
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
574.9
|
|
|
|
670.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(448.7
|
)(J)
|
|
|
796.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
985.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,031.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(726.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,290.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
506.1
|
|
|
|
397.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75.4
|
)(K)
|
|
|
827.7
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
510.3
|
|
|
|
404.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76.9
|
)(K)
|
|
|
838.1
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
$
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 1 Basis of Presentation for
explanation of reclassifications. |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements
51
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Scripts
|
|
|
Medco
|
|
|
for Consistent
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 25, 2010
|
|
|
Presentation(1)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
44,973.2
|
|
|
$
|
65,968.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(266.2
|
)(G)
|
|
$
|
110,675.3
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
42,015.0
|
|
|
|
61,633.2
|
|
|
|
(101.5
|
)
|
|
|
(266.2
|
)(G)
|
|
|
103,280.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,958.2
|
|
|
|
4,335.1
|
|
|
|
101.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,394.8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
887.3
|
|
|
|
1,550.4
|
|
|
|
388.9
|
|
|
|
1,352.5
|
(H)
|
|
|
4,179.1
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287.4
|
|
|
|
(287.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,070.9
|
|
|
|
2,497.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,352.5
|
)
|
|
|
3,215.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other income
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(167.1
|
)
|
|
|
(172.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465.5
|
)(I)
|
|
|
(805.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162.2
|
)
|
|
|
(163.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(465.5
|
)
|
|
|
(790.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,908.7
|
|
|
|
2,334.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,818.0
|
)
|
|
|
2,424.9
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
704.1
|
|
|
|
906.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(690.3
|
)(J)
|
|
|
920.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1,204.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,427.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,127.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,504.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
538.5
|
|
|
|
443.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84.2
|
)(K)
|
|
|
897.3
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
544.0
|
|
|
|
451.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85.8
|
)(K)
|
|
|
910.0
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.21
|
|
|
$
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 1 Basis of Presentation for
explanation of reclassifications. |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements
52
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements
|
|
Note 1
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and was
based on the historical audited financial statements of Express
Scripts and Medco for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
December 25, 2010, respectively, and unaudited financial
statements of Express Scripts and Medco as of and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and September 24,
2011, respectively. Certain reclassifications have been made to
the historical financial statements of Medco to conform to
Express Scripts presentation, including the presentation
of claims and rebates payable as a separate line item from
accounts payable and condensing Medcos receivable balances
into one line item. Additionally, Medcos product revenues
and service revenues have been combined into a single line item
and amortization of intangibles has been included in selling,
general and administrative expenses to conform to Express
Scripts presentation. Finally, the following adjustments
have been made to cost of revenues and selling, general and
administrative expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Reclassify bad debt
expense(1)
|
|
$
|
(100.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(130.5
|
)
|
Reclassify labor and benefits
expense(2)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
Allocation of IT related
expenses(3)
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustment to cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
(76.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassify bad debt
expense(1)
|
|
$
|
100.4
|
|
|
$
|
130.5
|
|
Reclassify labor and benefits
expense(2)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
Allocation of IT related
expenses(3)
|
|
|
(32.2
|
)
|
|
|
(40.6
|
)
|
Medco historical amortization of
intangibles(4)
|
|
|
219.6
|
|
|
|
287.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustment to selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
296.5
|
|
|
$
|
388.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Bad debt expense recorded by Medco has been reclassified from
cost of revenues to selling, general and administrative expenses
for consistent presentation in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Medco allocates a portion of the labor and benefits expenses for
certain employees who manage its relationships with retail
pharmacies and pharmaceutical manufacturers to cost of revenues.
The allocated amount of these labor and benefits expenses has
been reclassified to selling, general and administrative expense
for consistent presentation in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Adjustments have been made to allocate a portion of Medcos
pharmacy technology expenses from selling, general and
administrative expense to cost of revenues for consistent
presentation in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
statements of operations. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Amortization of intangibles, presented as a separate line item
in Medcos historical financial statements, has been
condensed into selling, general and administrative expense for
consistent presentation in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations. |
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2011 give effect to the
proposed mergers as if they had occurred on the first day of the
earliest period presented. The unaudited condensed combined
balance sheet as of September 30, 2011 gives effect to the
mergers as if they had occurred on September 30, 2011.
The acquisition method of accounting is based on authoritative
guidance for business combinations and uses the fair value
concepts defined in authoritative guidance. We prepared the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
using the acquisition method of accounting under these existing
U.S. GAAP standards.
53
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
The authoritative guidance for business combinations requires,
among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed
be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date if
fair value can reasonably be estimated. If the fair value of an
asset or liability that arises from a contingency cannot be
determined, the asset or liability is recognized if it is
probable that an asset existed or a liability has been incurred
at the acquisition date and the amount of such asset or
liability can be reasonably determined. In addition, the
guidance establishes that the consideration transferred be
measured at the closing date of the acquisition at the
then-current market price. As the purchase price includes shares
to be issued for consideration in the mergers, this will likely
result in an equity component that is different from the amount
assumed in these unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
The authoritative guidance for fair value defines the term
fair value, sets forth the valuation requirements
for any asset or liability measured at fair value, expands
related disclosure requirements and specifies a hierarchy of
valuation techniques based on the nature of inputs used to
develop the fair value measures. Fair value is defined in the
guidance as the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. This
is an exit price concept for the valuation of the asset or
liability. In addition, market participants are assumed to be
buyers and sellers in the principal (or the most advantageous)
market for the asset or liability. Fair value measurements for
an asset assume the highest and best use by these market
participants. As a result of these standards, we may be required
to record assets that we do not intend to use or sell (defensive
assets)
and/or to
value assets at fair value measurements that do not reflect
Express Scripts intended use of those assets. Many of
these fair value measurements can be highly subjective and it is
also possible that other professionals, applying reasonable
judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and
support a range of alternative estimated amounts.
The pro forma adjustments described below have been developed
based on assumptions and estimates, including assumptions
relating to the consideration to be paid and the allocation
thereof to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from
Medco based on preliminary estimates of fair value. The final
purchase price and the allocation thereof will differ from that
reflected in the pro forma condensed combined financial
statements after final valuation procedures are performed and
amounts are finalized following the completion of the mergers.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not purport
to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations
or the consolidated financial position of New Express Scripts
would have been had the mergers occurred on the dates assumed,
nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated
results of operations or financial position.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
do not reflect any cost savings from operating efficiencies,
synergies or other restructurings that could result from the
mergers. Additionally, no adjustments were made to reflect
termination costs to be incurred in connection with the mergers,
as such costs are not currently factually supportable.
Express Scripts has been determined to be the acquirer under the
acquisition method of accounting based on various
considerations. Upon closing of the mergers, Express Scripts
stockholders are expected to own approximately 59% of New
Express Scripts and Medco stockholders are expected to own
approximately 41%. Additionally, New Express Scripts will
transfer cash and issue common stock as the merger consideration
to Medco stockholders. Further, the Board of Directors and
senior management of New Express Scripts will be comprised
primarily of current Express Scripts board members and senior
management, respectively.
Express Scripts performed a preliminary review of Medcos
accounting policies, based primarily on publicly available
information, to determine whether any adjustments were necessary
to ensure comparability in the pro forma combined financial
statements. At this time, Express Scripts is not aware of any
differences that would have a material impact on the pro forma
combined financial statements. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements do not reflect any differences in
accounting policies. Upon completion of the mergers, or as more
information becomes available, Express Scripts will perform a
more
54
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
detailed review of Medcos accounting policies. As a result
of that review, differences may be identified between the
accounting policies of the two companies that, when conformed,
could have a material impact on the combined financial
statements.
Note 2
Preliminary Purchase Price
The total consideration for the transaction is
$26.7 billion, composed of $66.89 per share in cash and New
Express Scripts stock (valued based on the closing price
of Express Scripts stock on November 10, 2011), including
$28.80 in cash and 0.81 shares for each Medco share
outstanding. The purchase price for the business combination is
estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Purchase Price Including Debt Assumed (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash to be paid to Medco
stockholders(1)
|
|
$
|
11,141.9
|
|
Value of shares of New Express Scripts common stock to be issued
to Medco
stockholders(2)
|
|
|
14,734.5
|
|
Value of New Express Scripts restricted stock units to be issued
to holders of Medco restricted stock
units(3)
|
|
|
215.0
|
|
Value of New Express Scripts stock options to be issued to
holders of Medco stock
options(3)(4)
|
|
|
593.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration to be transferred
|
|
|
26,684.4
|
|
Debt assumed
|
|
|
5,380.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
32,064.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equals Medco outstanding shares as of September 24, 2011
multiplied by $28.80 per share. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Equals Medco outstanding shares as of September 24, 2011
multiplied by the exchange ratio of 0.81, multiplied by the
Express Scripts closing share price at November 10, 2011 of
$47.02. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the fair
value of replacement awards attributable to precombination
service is recorded as part of the consideration transferred in
the mergers, while the fair value of replacement awards
attributable to postcombination service is recorded separately
from the business combination and recognized as compensation
cost in the post-acquisition period over the remaining service
period. The portion of Medco stock options attributable to
precombination and postcombination service is estimated based on
the ratio of vested to unvested stock options and the average
vesting period. These postcombination compensation costs have
been recorded as adjustments to the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2011. See Note 4 Unaudited
Pro Forma Adjustments (H) for adjustment amounts.
Various estimates were used in this calculation, including
average remaining vesting period. These estimates could differ
significantly from actual amounts calculated at the date of the
mergers, and such differences could have a material impact on
the total purchase price. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The fair value of the New Express Scripts equivalent stock
options was estimated as of November 10, 2011 using the
Black-Scholes valuation model utilizing various assumptions. The
expected volatility of the New Express Scripts common stock
price is based on the average historical volatility over the
expected term based on daily closing stock prices of Express
Scripts common stock. The expected term of the option is based
on Medco historical employee stock option exercise behavior as
well as the remaining contractual exercise term. The stock price
volatility and expected term are based on Express Scripts
best estimates at this time, both of which impact the fair value
of the option calculated under the Black-Scholes methodology
and, ultimately, the total consideration that will be recorded
at the effective time of the mergers. These estimates are
subject to change with market conditions and other
circumstances, and these changes may have a material impact on
the fair value of stock options used to calculate the total
purchase price. |
55
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
Since the Express Scripts stock price at the November 10,
2011 measurement date used for purposes of these unaudited
condensed combined pro forma financial statements exceeds the
average stock price for the 15 days prior to and including
such measurement date, which is used to calculate the exchange
ratio, excess fair value of $109.9 million is recorded for
the replacement stock options. For the purposes of the unaudited
condensed combined pro forma statements of operations, this
excess fair value has been amortized over the remaining vesting
period of the stock options resulting in additional compensation
expense of $67.2 million and $22.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively. Express Scripts will
recalculate the fair values of the Medco stock options and the
converted options as of the closing date to determine the excess
fair value amounts, if any, to be recorded as compensation
expense by New Express Scripts.
Medcos stock incentive plan includes a provision for the
acceleration of vesting of awards granted under the Medco stock
incentive plan in certain circumstances involving termination in
connection with a change in control. No adjustments have been
made to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements as a result of this provision, as Express Scripts
cannot currently predict the nature and extent of terminations
to be made in connection with the mergers.
The portion of the purchase price to be paid in shares of New
Express Scripts common stock is valued based on the number of
Medco shares outstanding immediately prior to the mergers and
the Express Scripts share price on that date. A 10% difference
in Express Scripts stock price would change the purchase
price by approximately $1.6 billion with a corresponding
change to goodwill. Additionally, a 10% change in the number of
Medco shares outstanding would change the purchase price by
approximately $2.6 billion, with a corresponding change to
goodwill. The actual purchase price will fluctuate with the
price of Express Scripts common stock until the effective
date of the acquisition and the final valuation could differ
significantly from the current estimate.
|
|
Note 3
|
Preliminary
Purchase Price Allocation
|
The combined company will allocate the purchase price paid by
Express Scripts to the fair value of the Medco assets acquired
and liabilities assumed. The pro forma purchase price allocation
below has been developed based on preliminary estimates of fair
value using the historical financial statements of Medco as of
September 24, 2011. In addition, the allocation of the
purchase price to acquired intangible assets is based on
preliminary fair value estimates and is subject to final
management analysis, with the assistance of third party
valuation advisors, at the completion of the mergers. Once
Express Scripts and its third party valuation advisors have full
access to the specifics of Medcos intangible assets,
additional insight will be gained that could impact:
(i) the estimated total value assigned to intangible
assets, (ii) the estimated allocation of value between
finite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets
and/or
(iii) the estimated weighted-average useful life of each
category of intangible assets. The estimated intangible asset
values and their useful lives could be impacted by a variety of
factors that may become known to us only upon access to
additional information
and/or by
changes in such factors that may occur prior to the effective
time of the mergers.
The estimated intangible assets are comprised of customer
contracts with an estimated useful life of 10 years and
trade names with an estimated useful life of 5 years, which
is consistent with the estimated benefit period. Since Express
Scripts has limited information at this time to value all of the
intangible assets, the estimated fair values were based
primarily on current estimates of Medcos expected future
cash flows for all customer contracts and trade names. Express
Scripts expects that the estimated value assigned to
Medcos customer contracts is likely to change as access is
gained by Express Scripts to the specifics of Medcos
customer contracts and as life and renewal assumptions are
refined. Additional intangible asset classes may be identified
as the valuation process continues, however such items are
currently not expected to be material to the overall purchase
price allocation. A 10% change in the amount allocated to
identifiable intangible assets would increase or decrease annual
amortization expense by $140.0 million. The residual amount
of the purchase price after preliminary allocation to
identifiable intangibles has been allocated to goodwill. The
56
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
actual amounts recorded when the mergers are complete may differ
materially from the pro forma amounts presented below (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
5,558.3
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,027.1
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
91.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tangible assets acquired
|
|
|
6,676.4
|
|
Value assigned to intangible assets acquired
|
|
|
11,700.0
|
|
Liabilities assumed, excluding debt
|
|
|
(7,274.6
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability related to acquired intangible assets and
replacement stock awards included in the purchase price
|
|
|
(3,313.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired in excess of liabilities assumed
|
|
|
7,788.5
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
24,276.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
|
32,064.8
|
|
Less debt assumed
|
|
|
(5,380.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total payments to Medco stockholders
|
|
$
|
26,684.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4
|
Unaudited
Pro Forma Adjustments
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance
Sheet
(A) Sources
and Uses
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of funds:
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts cash on hand at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,000.0
|
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
4,000.0
|
|
Additional debt financing
|
|
|
8,426.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources of funds
|
|
$
|
13,426.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of funds:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments to Medco stockholders
|
|
$
|
11,141.9
|
|
Payment of Medco 2012 term loan and revolving credit facility
|
|
|
2,000.0
|
|
Express Scripts transaction
costs(1)
|
|
|
151.7
|
|
New debt issuance
costs(2)
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total use of funds
|
|
$
|
13,426.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the
transactions costs are expensed as they are incurred. |
In connection with the mergers, on August 5, 2011, Express
Scripts entered into the $14.0 billion unsecured bridge
facility. On the effective date of the bridge facility and prior
to the consummation of the Express Scripts merger, Express
Scripts will be the borrower under the bridge facility. New
Express Scripts will assume the role, rights and obligations of
Express Scripts and become the borrower under the bridge
facility upon consummation of the Express Scripts merger. The
bridge facility will be available for Express Scripts or New
Express Scripts to pay a portion of the cash consideration in
accordance with the merger
57
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
agreement, to repay any existing indebtedness that will become
due or otherwise default upon consummation of the mergers, and
to pay related fees and expenses.
In connection with the mergers, on August 29, 2011, Express
Scripts entered into a $5.5 billion permanent facility
consisting of the five-year $4.0 billion unsecured term
loan facility and the five-year $1.5 billion unsecured
revolving loan facility. On the effective date of the permanent
facility and prior to the consummation of the Express Scripts
merger, Express Scripts will be the borrower under the permanent
facility. New Express Scripts will assume the role, rights and
obligations of Express Scripts and become the borrower under the
term/revolving credit agreement upon consummation of the Express
Scripts merger. The term loan facility will be available for
Express Scripts to pay a portion of the cash consideration in
accordance with the merger agreement, to repay any existing
indebtedness that will become due or otherwise default upon
consummation of the mergers and to pay related fees and
expenses. The revolving loan facility will be available for
working capital needs and general corporate purposes. Upon entry
into the term loan facility, the commitments under the bridge
facility were automatically reduced by $4.0 billion. Upon
funding of the term loan facility, the $1.5 billion
revolving loan facility will replace Express Scripts
current $750 million revolving credit facility.
In the period leading up to the closing of the mergers, Express
Scripts may pursue other financing opportunities to replace all
or portions of the bridge facility, or, in the event that
Express Scripts draws upon the bridge facility, Express Scripts
may refinance all or a portion of the bridge facility at a later
date. The proceeds from these borrowings may be used to pay a
portion of the cash consideration to be paid in the mergers and
to pay related fees and expenses.
Express Scripts intends to borrow $4.0 billion under the
term loan facility in connection with the mergers. The balance
of the financing in connection with the mergers could take any
of several forms or any combination of them, including but not
limited to the following: (i) Express Scripts may draw up
to $10.0 billion under the bridge facility, reduced by the
amount of proceeds from any senior notes offerings;
(ii) Express Scripts may issue senior notes in the public
and/or
private capital markets; and (iii) Express Scripts may use
cash on hand. When any senior notes are issued, the commitments
under the bridge facility will automatically reduce in an amount
equal to the aggregate principal amount of such senior notes.
Amounts borrowed for funding the mergers may differ
significantly from the amounts assumed in the sources of funds
table above.
(B) Debt
Upon close of the mergers, Express Scripts intends to settle
Medcos $2.0 billion of current debt outstanding under
its unsecured credit agreements.
The adjustment to long-term debt is comprised of the following
items (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Financing incurred in connection with the mergers
|
|
$
|
12,426.3
|
|
Adjust Medco pre-merger fixed rate debt to fair value
|
|
|
341.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to long-term debt
|
|
$
|
12,768.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of Medcos senior notes were estimated
based on observable relevant market information.
Additionally, deferred financing fees of $3.7 million and
$11.4 million relating to pre-merger Medco debt have been
eliminated from Prepaid expenses and other current assets and
Other assets, respectively, in connection with the adjustment of
Medcos debt to fair value.
(C) Property
and equipment, net
Based on the preliminary fair value assessment, the carrying
value of Medcos property and equipment at
September 24, 2011 approximates fair value. As such, the
carrying value of Medcos property and equipment was used
in the preliminary purchase price allocation, and no adjustments
were made to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet. Adjustments may be required when additional information
is
58
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
obtained and a more detailed review is performed over the fair
value of property and equipment. The actual amounts recorded
when the mergers are completed may differ materially from the
current book value of property and equipment.
(D) Goodwill
and other intangible assets
The net adjustment to goodwill includes the elimination of Medco
pre-merger goodwill balances and is calculated as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price allocation to goodwill (Note 3)
|
|
$
|
24,276.3
|
|
Elimination of pre-merger Medco goodwill
|
|
|
(6,957.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to goodwill
|
|
$
|
17,318.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net adjustment to other intangible assets, net, is
calculated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
New intangibles recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
Value assigned to intangible assets
acquired(1)
|
|
$
|
11,700.0
|
|
Debt issuance
costs(2)
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
Elimination of Medco pre-merger other intangibles
|
|
|
(2,214.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to other intangible assets
|
|
$
|
9,618.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the preliminary valuation, intangible assets acquired
is comprised of $9.4 billion of customer contracts and
$2.3 billion of trade names. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
These represent deferred financing fees incurred in connection
with the bridge facility, the term loan facility and the
revolving loan facility. Amounts incurred in connection with the
bridge facility are being amortized over nine months, and
amounts incurred in relation to the term loan facility and the
revolving loan facility are being amortized over the five year
term of such facilities. Estimated amounts to be incurred in
connection with the other proposed financing transaction are
being amortized over an estimated weighted average period of
11.1 years. This amortization period may differ materially
from the estimates used for the purposes of these unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements. See Note
(I) below for a sensitivity analysis of the impact
of our assumptions to interest expense. |
See Note 3 for the estimated purchase price allocation. The
final valuation could differ significantly from the current
estimate. The pro forma purchase price allocation is preliminary
as the mergers have not yet been completed. The pro forma
presentation assumes that the historical values of Medcos
tangible assets and liabilities approximate fair value.
Additionally, the allocation of the purchase price to acquired
intangible assets is preliminary and subject to the final
outcome of managements analysis to be conducted, with the
assistance of valuation advisors, upon the completion of the
mergers. The residual amount of the purchase price has been
allocated to goodwill. The actual amounts recorded when the
mergers are completed may differ materially from the pro forma
amounts presented herein.
(E) Deferred
taxes
The adjustment reflects an increase of $3,621.8 million in
deferred tax liabilities associated with the recording of new
identifiable intangible assets for the combined company. This
amount was calculated using a tax rate of 38.18%, which
represents Express Scripts and Medcos estimated
blended rate for the first nine months of 2011, which
approximates the relevant statutory rate. This was offset by an
additional adjustment of $308.5 million associated with the
portion of replacement stock options and restricted stock units
allocated to the purchase price. The actual amounts recorded for
deferred taxes may differ materially from the pro forma amounts
presented herein.
59
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
(F) Equity
The historical stockholders equity of Medco will be
eliminated upon the completion of the mergers. The total
stockholders equity of the combined company will be
increased over the pre-merger Express Scripts amounts by the
value of the common stock issued in connection with the purchase
price. New Express Scripts will be issuing approximately
$15.5 billion of stock as part of the purchase price
consideration. The calculation below estimates the number of
shares issued to be 313.4 million using a share price of
$47.02 (Express Scripts closing share price on
November 10, 2011), and the number of replacement stock
options and restricted stock units to be 50.1 million. The
number of shares issued is dependent on the number of Medco
shares, restricted shares and options outstanding on the date of
the mergers. See the calculation of the pro forma adjustments to
common stock and additional paid-in capital below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock in
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury at
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Elimination of pre-merger Medco equity balances
|
|
$
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,760.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
(7,668.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,852.9
|
|
Impact of shares to be issued to Medco stockholders
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
15,538.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated transaction fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pro forma adjustment
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,778.9
|
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
(7,819.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,852.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statements of
Operations
(G) Revenues
and Cost of revenues
Adjustments have been included in the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statements of operations to eliminate
revenues and cost of revenues from transactions between Express
Scripts and Medco. Express Scripts and Medcos pharmacies
may be included in the pharmacy networks of the other respective
company in order to fulfill members prescriptions for
certain drugs that are under limited or exclusive distribution
contracts with manufacturers.
(H) Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Intangible asset
amortization(1)
|
|
$
|
830.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,112.6
|
|
Post combination stock compensation expense (Note 2)
|
|
|
85.7
|
|
|
|
241.3
|
|
Elimination of non-recurring charges directly attributable to
the transaction
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of amortization of prior service costs and actuarial
gain/loss related to pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans(2)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustment to selling, general and administrative
|
|
$
|
894.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,352.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of the effective time of the mergers, identifiable intangible
assets are required to be measured at fair value and these
acquired assets could include assets that are not intended to be
used or sold or that are intended to be used in a manner other
than their highest and best use. For purposes of these unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial statements, it is assumed
that all assets will be used and that all assets will be used in
a manner that represents the highest and best use of those
assets. Adjustments have been included in the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined statements of operations to record the
estimated net increase in amortization expense for other
intangible assets. The incremental additional expense |
60
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
was calculated on a straight-line basis using a preliminary
estimated useful life of 10 years for customer contracts
and 5 years for trade names to amortize the preliminary
estimated value of $11.7 billion assigned to identifiable
intangible assets. Express Scripts is still considering a
modified pattern of benefit method of amortization over
10 years for customer contracts. A modified pattern of
benefit method of amortization would result in a greater portion
of the expense recorded in the first 5 years to better
reflect the expected cash flows under the mergers, resulting in
greater amortization expense during the early years. Further
assessments will also be performed regarding the appropriate
amortization method for trade names and any other definite-lived
intangible assets identified. A determination will be made as
Express Scripts is able to perform a more detailed review of
Medcos records. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In January 2011, Medco amended its postretirement healthcare
benefit plan, discontinuing the benefit for all active
non-retirement eligible employees. Medco had previously reduced
and capped the benefit through a 2003 plan amendment, the effect
of which resulted in a prior service credit reflected as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in
stockholders equity. As this amount is being eliminated on
the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet in
connection with the elimination of Medcos pre-merger
equity, adjustments have been made to eliminate the
corresponding amortization of pension and postretirement prior
service costs and actuarial gains and losses from selling,
general and administrative expenses. |
(I) Interest
Expense
For the purposes of the unaudited condensed combined pro forma
financial statements, Express Scripts is assumed to partially
fund the mergers through drawing $4.0 billion under the
term loan facility and up to $10.0 billion under the bridge
facility, reduced in proportion to the gross proceeds from any
senior notes offerings. The adjustment included in the unaudited
pro forma condensed combined statements of operations reflects
the additional interest expense using an estimated weighted
average interest rate of 4.17% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 3.93% for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010. For purposes of estimating the weighted
average interest rate, we have made certain assumptions
regarding a proposed financing transaction. The actual weighted
average interest rate may differ from the estimated rate due to
changes in market conditions or differences between the actual
terms of any debt financing and our assumptions. The estimated
interest rates for the bridge facility and the term loan
facility were calculated using the prime rate plus a margin of
0.50%, based on our consolidated leverage ratio as of
September 30, 2011. The interest rate for the bridge
facility also assumes that the margin will increase by 0.25% on
the 90th day after the funding date and by an additional 0.25%
every 90 days thereafter, per the terms of the bridge
financing credit agreement. Adjustments have also been made for
the historical interest expense related to Medcos
$2.0 billion of debt outstanding under its unsecured credit
agreements that will be repaid at the closing of the mergers.
61
Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
The adjustment to interest expense reflects the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Interest expense on financing incurred in connection with the
mergers assuming a weighted average interest rate of 4.17% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 3.93% for the
year ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
388.2
|
|
|
$
|
487.7
|
|
Amortization associated with increase in pre-merger Medco debt
to fair value, amortized over the remaining life of each
obligation
|
|
|
(56.5
|
)
|
|
|
(79.4
|
)
|
Eliminate write-off of bridge facility deferred financing fees
upon entry into term loan facility
|
|
|
(26.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminate amortization of bridge facility deferred financing
costs recorded in the nine months ended September 30,
2011(1)
|
|
|
(15.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs recorded in connection
with financing assumed in connection with the mergers (See
(B) above)
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
Historical interest cost debt to be repaid
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to interest expense
|
|
$
|
280.9
|
|
|
$
|
465.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of
1/8%
increase in weighted average interest rates
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount is being eliminated since the deferred financing
fees incurred in connection with the bridge facility are being
amortized over nine months. As such, the entire amount of
amortization is assumed to occur in the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010. |
The pro forma combined income tax provision has been adjusted
for the tax effect of adjustments to income before income taxes
at the estimated blended effective rate for the periods
presented as the effective rate approximates the statutory rate
for the periods presented. The effective tax rate of the
combined company could be significantly different depending on
post-acquisition activities.
|
|
(K)
|
Basic
and diluted shares
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined basic and diluted
earnings per share calculations are based on the combined basic
and diluted weighted-average shares. The historical basic and
diluted weighted average shares of Medco are assumed to be
replaced by the shares expected to be issued by New Express
Scripts at an exchange ratio of 0.81 per Medco share.
62
CAUTIONARY
NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This material may include forward-looking statements, both with
respect to us and our industry, that reflect our current views
with respect to future events and financial performance.
Statements that include the words expect,
intend, plan, believe,
project, anticipate, will,
may, would and similar statements of a
future or forward-looking nature may be used to identify
forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements
address matters that involve risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there are or will be
important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in such statements and,
therefore, you should not place undue reliance on any such
statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not
limited to, the following:
STANDARD
OPERATING FACTORS
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to remain profitable in a very competitive
marketplace is dependent upon our ability to attract and retain
clients while maintaining our margins, to differentiate our
products and services from others in the marketplace, and to
develop and cross sell new products and services to our existing
clients;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our failure to anticipate and appropriately adapt to changes in
the rapidly changing health care industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in applicable laws or regulations, or their
interpretation or enforcement, or the enactment of new laws or
regulations, which apply to our business practices (past,
present or future) or require us to spend significant resources
in order to comply;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to the healthcare industry designed to manage healthcare
costs or alter healthcare financing practices;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes relating to our participation in Medicare Part D,
the loss of Medicare Part D eligible members, or our
failure to otherwise execute on our strategies related to
Medicare Part D;
|
|
|
|
|
|
A failure in the security or stability of our technology
infrastructure, or the infrastructure of one or more of our key
vendors, or a significant failure or disruption in service
within our operations or the operations of such vendors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our failure to effectively execute on strategic transactions, or
to integrate or achieve anticipated benefits from any acquired
businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The termination, or an unfavorable modification, of our
relationship with one or more key pharmacy providers, or
significant changes within the pharmacy provider marketplace;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The termination, or an unfavorable modification, of our
relationship with one or more key pharmaceutical manufacturers,
or the significant reduction in payments made or discounts
provided by pharmaceutical manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in industry pricing benchmarks;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results in pending and future litigation or other proceedings
which would subject us to significant monetary damages or
penalties
and/or
require us to change our business practices, or the costs
incurred in connection with such proceedings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our failure to execute on, or other issues arising under,
certain key client contracts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of our debt service obligations on the availability
of funds for other business purposes, and the terms and our
required compliance with covenants relating to our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our failure to attract and retain talented employees, or to
manage succession and retention for our Chief Executive Officer
or other key executives;
|
63
TRANSACTION-RELATED
FACTORS
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty as to whether Express Scripts and Medco will be able
to consummate the mergers on the terms set forth in the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ability to obtain governmental approvals of the mergers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty as to the market value of Express Scripts merger
consideration and the stock component of the Medco merger
consideration;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the mergers,
including as a result of a delay in completing the mergers or a
delay or difficulty in integrating the businesses of Express
Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty as to the long-term value of New Express Scripts
common shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations on the ability of Express Scripts and New Express
Scripts to incur new debt in connection with the mergers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected amount and timing of cost savings and operating
synergies; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Failure to receive the approval of the stockholders of either
Express Scripts or Medco for the mergers.
|
The foregoing review of important factors should not be
construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with
the other cautionary statements that are included herein and
elsewhere, including the risk factors included in Express
Scripts most recent reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and the risk factors included in Medcos most recent
reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and other documents of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and
Medco on file with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements made
in this material are qualified in their entirety by these
cautionary statements, and there can be no assurance that the
actual results or developments anticipated by us will be
realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have
the expected consequences to, or effects on, us or our business
or operations. Except to the extent required by applicable law,
we undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE COMPANIES
Express
Scripts, Inc.
Express Scripts, Inc. was incorporated in Missouri in September
1986, and reincorporated in Delaware in March 1992. Express
Scripts provides integrated pharmacy benefit management services
including network-pharmacy claims processing, home delivery
services, specialty benefit management, benefit-design
consultation, drug-utilization review, formulary management, and
medical and drug data analysis services. Express Scripts also
distributes a full range of biopharmaceutical products and
provides extensive cost-management and patient-care services.
Express Scripts principal executive offices are located at
One Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63121. Express
Scripts telephone number is
(314) 996-0900
and its web site is www.express-scripts.com.
Medco
Health Solutions, Inc.
The predecessor entity to Medco Health Solutions, Inc. was
originally incorporated in June 1983 and operated as a publicly
traded company from 1984 until its acquisition by
Merck & Co., Inc. in 1993. After its spin-off from
Merck & Co., Inc., Medco Health Solutions, Inc. became
an independent publicly traded company on August 19, 2003.
Medco provides pharmacy benefit management services, including
64
comprehensive management of prescription claims, benefit-design
consultation, clinical management services, clinical and
specialty pharmacy services and research support. Medcos
principal executive offices are located at 100 Parsons Pond
Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417. Medcos telephone
number is
(201) 269-3400
and its web site is www.medcohealth.com.
Aristotle
Holding, Inc.
Aristotle Holding, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Express Scripts. Aristotle Holding,
Inc. was organized on July 15, 2011, solely for the purpose
of effecting the mergers and, following consummation of the
mergers, we anticipate that Aristotle Holding, Inc. will change
its name to Express Scripts Holding Company.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Plato Merger Sub, Inc. will be
merged with and into Medco, and Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc. will
be merged with and into Express Scripts. As a result, Medco and
Express Scripts will each become wholly owned subsidiaries of
New Express Scripts. As a result of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, New Express Scripts will
become a publicly traded corporation, and former Medco and
Express Scripts stockholders will own stock in New Express
Scripts. New Express Scripts has not carried on any activities
other than in connection with the mergers. New Express
Scripts principal executive offices are located at One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121.
Aristotle
Merger Sub, Inc.
Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts. Express
Scripts Merger Sub was organized on July 15, 2011, solely
for the purpose of effecting the mergers. Express Scripts Merger
Sub will be merged with and into Express Scripts and, as a
result, Express Scripts will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
New Express Scripts. It has not carried on any activities other
than in connection with the mergers. Express Scripts Merger
Subs principal executive offices are located at One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121.
Plato
Merger Sub, Inc.
Plato Merger Sub, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts. Medco Merger Sub
was organized on July 15, 2011, solely for the purpose of
effecting the mergers. Medco Merger Sub will be merged with and
into Medco and, as a result, Medco will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of New Express Scripts. It has not carried on any
activities other than in connection with the mergers. Medco
Merger Subs principal executive offices are located at One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121.
THE MEDCO
SPECIAL MEETING
This section contains information about the special meeting of
Medco stockholders that has been called to consider and adopt
the merger agreement, to approve the adjournment of the Medco
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement) and to approve, by non-binding advisory
vote, certain compensation arrangements for Medcos named
executive officers in connection with the mergers.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to the
stockholders of Medco in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the Medco board for use at the Medco special meeting.
Medco is first mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
accompanying proxy card to its stockholders on or about
November 18, 2011.
Date,
Time and Place
A special meeting of the stockholders of Medco will be held at
the Woodcliff Lake Hilton, 200 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff, New
Jersey 07677 on December 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern
time, unless the special meeting is adjourned or postponed.
65
Purpose
At the special meeting, Medco stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to adopt the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Medco special
meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit additional
proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger
agreement); and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, certain
compensation arrangements for Medcos named executive
officers in connection with the mergers contemplated by the
merger agreement.
|
Recommendation
of the Medco Board
The Medco board has unanimously (i) approved the merger
agreement and consummation of the Medco merger upon the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the merger agreement, the
Medco merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Medco and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the merger
agreement be submitted to Medco stockholders for adoption at the
Medco special meeting, (iv) recommended that Medcos
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and (v) declared
that the merger agreement is advisable.
The Medco board unanimously recommends that Medco
stockholders vote:
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement;
FOR the proposal to approve the adjournment of
the special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement); and
FOR the proposal to approve, by non-binding
advisory vote, certain compensation arrangements for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers contemplated by the merger agreement.
See The Mergers Recommendation of the Medco
board; Medcos Reasons for the Merger beginning on
page 86.
Medco stockholders should carefully read this joint proxy
statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed
information concerning the merger agreement, the proposed
transactions and certain compensation arrangements for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers. In addition, Medco stockholders are directed to the
merger agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Record
Date; Shares Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of shares of Medco common stock at the
close of business on the Medco record date (November 4,
2011) will be entitled to vote shares held at that date at the
Medco special meeting or any adjournments or postponements
thereof. Each outstanding share of Medco common stock entitles
its holder to cast one vote.
As of the Medco record date, there were 387,152,813 shares
of Medco common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding
and entitled to vote at the Medco special meeting.
Quorum
The presence, in person or represented by proxy, of holders of
one-third of the Medco common stock issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Medco special meeting constitutes a
quorum. In the absence of a quorum, the chairman of the special
meeting or the holders of a majority of the Medco common stock
issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special
meeting, present in person or represented by proxy,
66
will have power to adjourn the special meeting. As of the
record date for the Medco special meeting,
129,050,938 shares of Medco common stock will be required
to achieve a quorum.
Holders of shares of Medco common stock present in person at the
Medco special meeting but not voting, and shares of Medco common
stock for which Medco has received proxies indicating that their
holders have abstained, will be counted as present at the Medco
special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is
established.
Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of
shares that are held in street name for their clients, the
beneficial owners of the shares, brokers have discretion to vote
these shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters.
The adoption of the merger agreement is not considered a routine
matter. Accordingly, brokers will not have discretionary voting
authority to vote your shares on that matter at the Medco
special meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when brokers do not
have discretionary voting authority and have not received
instructions from the beneficial owners of the shares on a
particular non-routine matter. A broker will not be permitted to
vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement without
instruction from the beneficial owner of the shares of Medco
common stock held by that broker. Accordingly, shares of Medco
common stock beneficially owned that have been designated on
proxy cards by the broker, bank or nominee as not voted on the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement (broker non-vote) will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Broker non-votes, if
any, will be counted for purposes of determining whether a
quorum exists at the special meeting. If you hold shares of
Medco stock through a broker, bank or other organization with
custody of your shares, follow the voting instructions you
receive from that organization.
Vote
Required
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement by Medco
stockholders: Adopting the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of Medco common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Accordingly, a Medco stockholders failure to submit a
proxy card or to vote in person at the special meeting, an
abstention from voting, or the failure of a Medco stockholder
who holds his or her shares in street name through a
broker or other nominee to give voting instructions to such
broker or other nominee, will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement.
Proposal to Adjourn the Medco Special Meeting by Medco
stockholders: Approving the adjournment of the
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement) requires the affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the shares of Medco common stock present, in
person or represented by proxy, at the special meeting and
entitled to vote on the adjournment proposal. Accordingly,
abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn the special meeting.
Proposal Regarding Certain Medco Merger-related
Executive Compensation Arrangements: In
accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, Medco is
providing stockholders with the opportunity to approve, by
non-binding, advisory vote, certain compensation payments for
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
mergers, as reported in the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Advisory Vote on
Merger-related Compensation for Medco Named Executive
Officers beginning on page 182. Approving this
merger-related executive compensation requires the affirmative
vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Medco common
stock present, in person or represented by proxy, at the special
meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal to approve such
merger-related compensation. Accordingly, abstentions will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal
to approve the merger-related executive compensation, while
broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the special
meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote to
approve the merger-related executive compensation.
67
Voting by
Medcos Directors and Executive Officers
As of the Medco record date, Medcos directors and
executive officers and certain of their affiliates beneficially
owned 5,802,509 shares of Medco common stock entitled to
vote at the Medco special meeting. This represents approximately
1.5% in voting power of the outstanding shares of Medco common
stock entitled to be cast at the Medco special meeting. Each
Medco director and executive officer and certain of their
affiliates has indicated his or her present intention to vote,
or cause to be voted, the shares of Medco common stock owned by
him or her for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. As of
the Medco record date, Medco did not beneficially own any shares
of Medco common stock.
How to
Vote
Stockholders may vote using any of the following methods:
By
telephone or on the Internet
You can vote by calling the toll-free telephone number on your
proxy card. Please have your proxy card handy when you call.
Easy-to-follow
voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that
your instructions have been properly recorded.
The website for Internet voting is www.proxyvote.com. Please
have your proxy card handy when you go online. As with telephone
voting, you can confirm that your instructions have been
properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you also can
request electronic delivery of future proxy materials.
Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of
record will be available 24 hours a day beginning on or
about November 18, 2011, and will close at 11:59 p.m.
Eastern time on December 20, 2011. The availability of
telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners will depend
on the voting processes of your broker, bank or other holder of
record. Therefore, Medco recommends that you follow the voting
instructions in the materials you receive.
If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to
return your proxy card.
By
mail
If you received your special meeting materials by mail, you may
complete, sign and date the proxy card or voting instruction
card and return it in the prepaid envelope. If you are a
stockholder of record and you return your signed proxy card but
do not indicate your voting preferences, the persons named in
the proxy card will vote the shares represented by that proxy as
recommended by the Medco board.
In
person at the special meeting
All Medco stockholders as of the Medco record date may vote in
person at the special meeting. You may also be represented by
another person at the Medco special meeting by executing a
proper proxy designating that person. If you are a beneficial
owner of Medco shares, you must obtain a legal proxy from your
broker, bank or other holder of record and present it to the
inspectors of election with your ballot to be able to vote at
the special meeting.
By
granting a proxy or submitting voting instructions
You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held in street
name, by submitting voting instructions to your bank, broker or
other holder of record.
Voting of
Proxies
If you vote by Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing,
dating and mailing your proxy card or voting instruction card,
your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign, date and return
your proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote or do
not indicate that you wish to abstain, your shares will be voted
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
68
agreement, FOR the proposal to adjourn the
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement) and FOR the proposal to
approve, by non-binding advisory vote, certain compensation
arrangements for Medcos named executive officers in
connection with the mergers, and in the discretion of the
proxyholders on any other matter that may properly come before
the meeting at the discretion of the Medco board.
Revoking
Your Proxy
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at
any time before it is voted at the Medco special meeting. To do
this, you must:
|
|
|
|
|
enter a new vote by telephone, over the Internet, or by signing
and returning another proxy card at a later date;
|
|
|
|
provide written notice of the revocation to our Corporate
Secretary or deliver another duly executed proxy or voter
instruction form dated subsequent to the date thereof to the
addressee named in the proxy or voter instruction form; or
|
|
|
|
attend the Medco special meeting and vote in person.
|
If your shares are held in street name, you must
contact your broker or nominee to revoke and vote your proxy.
Attending
the Special Meeting
Only Medco stockholders of record, or beneficial owners of Medco
common stock, as of the record date, may attend the special
meeting in person. You will need an admission ticket or proof of
ownership to enter the special meeting. An admission ticket is
attached to your proxy card if you hold shares directly in your
name as a stockholder of record. If you plan to attend the Medco
special meeting, please vote your proxy, but keep the admission
ticket and bring it with you to the special meeting.
If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker,
bank or other holder of record, you must present proof of your
ownership of Medco common stock, such as a bank or brokerage
account statement, to be admitted to the special meeting. Please
note that if you plan to attend the special meeting in person
and would like to vote there, you will need to bring a legal
proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record as
explained above. If your shares are held beneficially and you
would rather have an admission ticket, you can obtain one in
advance by mailing a written request, along with proof of your
ownership of Medco common stock, to:
Investor Relations Department
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail Stop F3-3
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
Stockholders also must present a form of photo identification,
such as a drivers license, in order to be admitted to the
special meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, large bags
or packages will be permitted in the special meeting.
Confidential
Voting
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify
individual Medco stockholders are handled in a manner that
protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed
either within Medco or to third parties, except: (i) as
necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (ii) to
allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote
and (iii) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.
Occasionally, stockholders provide written comments on their
proxy cards. All comments received are then forwarded to
Medcos management.
69
Stockholders
Sharing an Address
Medco has adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called
householding. Under this procedure, beneficial
stockholders who have the same address and last name and who do
not participate in electronic delivery or Internet access of
proxy materials will receive only one copy of stockholder
documents unless one or more of these stockholders notifies
Medco that they wish to continue receiving individual copies.
This procedure is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save
significant printing and processing costs, as well as natural
resources. Each stockholder who participates in householding
will continue to receive a separate proxy card. Your consent to
householding is perpetual unless you withhold or revoke it. You
may revoke your consent at any time by contacting Broadridge
Financial Solutions, Inc., either by calling toll-free at
(800) 542-1061,
or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York
11717. You will be removed from the householding program within
30 days of receipt of your response, after which you will
receive an individual copy of the stockholder documents.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Medco is soliciting proxies for the Medco special meeting from
Medco stockholders. Medco has also retained D.F.
King & Co., Inc. to solicit proxies for the special
meeting from Medco stockholders for a fee of approximately
$15,000, plus reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. Medco will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies
from Medco stockholders, except that Medco and Express Scripts
will share equally the expenses incurred in connection with the
printing and mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and filing all soliciting materials with the SEC. In addition to
this mailing, Medcos directors, officers and employees
(who will not receive any additional compensation for such
services) may solicit proxies. Solicitation of proxies will be
undertaken through the mail, in person, by telephone, the
Internet and videoconference.
Medco may also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries for their expenses for forwarding proxy
and solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of Medco
common stock and in obtaining voting instructions from such
beneficial owners.
Other
Business
There are no other matters that the Medco board intends to
present, or has reason to believe others will present, at the
Medco special meeting. If you have returned your signed and
completed proxy card and other matters are properly presented
for voting at the special meeting, the proxy committee appointed
by the Medco board (the persons named in your proxy card if you
are a stockholder of record) will have the discretion to vote on
those matters for you. For additional information on how
business can be brought before a meeting, see Bylaw 2.10 of
Medcos bylaws.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card or have
questions regarding Medcos special meeting, please contact
D.F. King & Co., Inc., the proxy solicitation agent
for Medco, by mail at 48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor, New York,
NY 10005, by telephone at
(800) 967-4612
(toll free) or
(212) 269-5500
(collect), or by
e-mail at
medco@dfking.com.
THE
EXPRESS SCRIPTS SPECIAL MEETING
This section contains information about the special meeting of
Express Scripts stockholders that has been called to consider
and adopt the merger agreement and to approve the adjournment of
the Express Scripts special meeting (if it is necessary or
appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement).
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to the
stockholders of Express Scripts in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Express Scripts board for use at
the Express Scripts special meeting. Express Scripts is first
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying
proxy card to its stockholders on or about November 18,
2011.
70
Date,
Time and Place
A special meeting of the stockholders of Express Scripts will be
held at the principal executive offices of Express Scripts, One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121 on December 21,
2011, at 7:30 a.m., Central time, unless the special
meeting is adjourned or postponed.
Purpose
At the special meeting, Express Scripts stockholders will be
asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to adopt the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Express Scripts
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement).
|
Had the transaction been structured as a direct acquisition of
Medco by Express Scripts, Express Scripts stockholders would
have been required to vote to authorize the issuance of shares
of Express Scripts. In the holding company structure
contemplated by the merger agreement, the shares will instead be
issued by New Express Scripts.
Recommendation
of the Express Scripts Board
The Express Scripts board has unanimously (i) approved the
merger agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement upon the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the Express Scripts
merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of, Express
Scripts and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the
merger agreement be submitted to Express Scripts stockholders
for adoption, (iv) recommended that Express Scripts
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and (v) declared
that the merger agreement is advisable.
The Express Scripts board unanimously recommends that Express
Scripts stockholders vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement;
and
|
|
|
|
FOR the proposal to approve the adjournment of
the special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to
solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to
adopt the merger agreement).
|
See The Mergers Recommendation of the Express
Scripts Board; Express Scripts Reasons for the
Mergers beginning on page 105.
Express Scripts stockholders should carefully read this joint
proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety for more detailed
information concerning the merger agreement and the proposed
transactions. In addition, Express Scripts stockholders are
directed to the merger agreement, which is attached as
Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Record
Date; Shares Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of shares of Express Scripts common stock
at the close of business on the Express Scripts record date
(November 4, 2011) will be entitled to vote shares held at
that date at the Express Scripts special meeting or any
adjournments or postponements thereof. Each outstanding share of
Express Scripts common stock entitles its holder to cast one
vote.
As of the Express Scripts record date, there were
485,490,309 shares of Express Scripts common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, outstanding and entitled to vote at the
Express Scripts special meeting.
71
Quorum
Holders of a majority in voting power of the Express Scripts
common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the
Express Scripts special meeting, present in person or
represented by proxy, constitute a quorum. In the absence of a
quorum a majority of the Express Scripts stockholders, present
in person or represented by proxy will have power to adjourn the
special meeting. As of the record date for the Express Scripts
special meeting, 242,745,155 shares of Express Scripts
common stock will be required to achieve a quorum.
Holders of shares of Express Scripts common stock present in
person at the Express Scripts special meeting but not voting,
and shares of Express Scripts common stock for which Express
Scripts has received proxies indicating that their holders have
abstained, will be counted as present at the Express Scripts
special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is
established.
Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of
shares that are held in street name for their clients, the
beneficial owners of the shares, brokers have discretion to vote
these shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters.
The adoption of the merger agreement is not considered a routine
matter. Accordingly, brokers will not have discretionary voting
authority to vote your shares on that matter at the Express
Scripts special meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when brokers
do not have discretionary voting authority and have not received
instructions from the beneficial owners of the shares. A broker
will not be permitted to vote on the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement without instruction from the beneficial owner
of the shares of Express Scripts common stock held by that
broker. Accordingly, shares of Express Scripts common stock
beneficially owned that have been designated on proxy cards by
the broker, bank or nominee as not voted (broker non-vote) will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Broker non-votes, if
any, will be counted for purposes of determining whether a
quorum exists at the special meeting.
Vote
Required
Proposal to Adopt the Merger Agreement by Express Scripts
stockholders: Adopting the merger agreement
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of Express Scripts common stock outstanding and entitled
to vote. Accordingly, an Express Scripts stockholders
failure to submit a proxy card or to vote in person at the
special meeting, an abstention from voting, or the failure of an
Express Scripts stockholder who holds his or her shares in
street name through a broker or other nominee to
give voting instructions to such broker or other nominee, will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal
to adopt the merger agreement.
Proposal to Adjourn the Express Scripts Special Meeting by
Express Scripts stockholders: Approving the
adjournment of the special meeting by stockholders (if it is
necessary or appropriate to solicit additional proxies if there
are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement) requires
the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Express Scripts common stock present in person or represented by
proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the
adjournment proposal, regardless of whether a quorum is present.
Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal to adjourn the special meeting,
while broker non-votes and shares not in attendance at the
special meeting will have no effect on the outcome of any vote
to adjourn the special meeting.
Voting by
Express Scripts Directors and Executive Officers
As of the Express Scripts record date, Express Scripts
directors and executive officers and certain of their affiliates
beneficially owned 3,677,764 shares of Express Scripts
common stock entitled to vote at the Express Scripts special
meeting. This represents approximately less than 1% in voting
power of the outstanding shares of Express Scripts common stock
entitled to be cast at the Express Scripts special meeting. Each
Express Scripts director and executive officer and certain of
their affiliates has indicated his or her present intention to
vote, or cause to be voted, the shares of Express Scripts common
stock owned by him or her for the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement. As of the Express Scripts record date, Express
Scripts did not beneficially own any shares of Express Scripts
common stock.
72
How to
Vote
If you are a stockholder of record (that is, if your shares of
Express Scripts common stock are registered in your name with
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, Express
Scripts transfer agent), there are four ways you can vote:
|
|
|
|
|
By attending the special meeting and voting in person by ballot;
|
|
|
|
By visiting the Internet at www.proxyvote.com;
|
|
|
|
By calling toll-free (within the U.S. or Canada)
1-800-690-6903; or
|
|
|
|
By completing, dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy
card in the accompanying prepaid reply envelope.
|
Telephone and Internet voting facilities for stockholders of
record will be available 24 hours a day beginning on or
about November 18, 2011 and will close at 11:59 p.m.
(Eastern time) on December 20, 2011. Submitting a proxy over the
Internet or by telephone is convenient, saves on postage and
mailing costs and is recorded immediately, minimizing risk that
postal delays may cause votes to arrive late and therefore not
be counted. Stockholders who attend the Express Scripts special
meeting may vote in person, and any previously submitted proxies
will be superseded by the vote cast at the Express Scripts
special meeting.
Shares that are held in a brokerage account in the name of the
broker are said to be held in street name.
Stockholders who hold their shares in street name
will need to obtain a voting instruction card from the
institution that holds their shares and must follow the voting
instructions given by that institution. Stockholders who hold
shares in street name and wish to vote at the
Express Scripts special meeting must obtain a legal proxy form
from the institution that holds their shares and bring that
proxy to the Express Scripts special meeting.
Voting of
Proxies
If you vote by Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing,
dating and mailing your proxy card or voting instruction card,
your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign, date and return
your proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote or do
not indicate that you wish to abstain, your shares will be voted
FOR the proposal to adopt the merger
agreement and FOR the proposal to adjourn the
special meeting (if it is necessary or appropriate to solicit
additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt
the merger agreement).
Revoking
Your Proxy
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at
any time before it is voted at the Express Scripts special
meeting. To do this, you must:
|
|
|
|
|
enter a new vote by telephone, over the Internet, or by signing
and returning another proxy card at a later date;
|
|
|
|
provide written notice of the revocation to our Corporate
Secretary or deliver another duly executed proxy or voter
instruction form dated subsequent to the date thereof to the
addressee named in the proxy or voter instruction form; or
|
|
|
|
attend the Express Scripts special meeting and vote in person.
|
If your shares are held in street name, you must
contact your broker or nominee to revoke and vote your proxy.
Attending
the Special Meeting
All Express Scripts stockholders as of the close of business on
the record date may attend the Express Scripts special meeting
but must have an admission ticket. If you are a stockholder of
record, the ticket attached to the proxy card will admit you and
one guest. If you are a beneficial owner of Express Scripts
shares, you may
73
request a ticket by writing to the Office of the Secretary, One
Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121 or by faxing your
request to 866-230-8345. You must provide evidence of your
ownership of shares with your ticket request, which you can
obtain from your broker, bank or nominee. Express Scripts
encourages you or your broker to fax your ticket request and
proof of ownership in order to avoid any mail delays. No
cameras, recording equipment, large bags or packages will be
permitted in the special meeting.
Confidential
Voting
As a matter of policy, Express Scripts keeps confidential
proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual
stockholders. Such documents are available for examination only
by the inspector of election and certain of Express
Scripts employees and Express Scripts transfer agent
and proxy solicitor who are associated with processing proxy
cards and tabulating the vote. The vote of any stockholder is
not disclosed except in a contested proxy solicitation or as may
be necessary to meet legal requirements.
Stockholders
Sharing an Address
Express Scripts may send a single set of stockholder documents
to any household at which two or more stockholders reside. This
process is called householding. This reduces the
volume of duplicate information received at your household and
helps us to reduce costs. Your materials may be householded
based on your prior express or implied consent. If your
materials have been householded and you wish to receive separate
copies of these documents, or if you are receiving duplicate
copies of these documents and wish to have the information
householded, you may write or call our Investor Relations
department at the following address or phone number: Express
Scripts, Inc., One Express Way, Saint Louis, Missouri 63121,
Investor Relations, telephone number
(314) 810-3123.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Express Scripts is soliciting proxies for the Express Scripts
special meeting from Express Scripts stockholders. Express
Scripts has also retained MacKenzie Partners Inc. to solicit
proxies for the special meeting from Express Scripts
stockholders for a fee of $50,000 plus reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. Express Scripts will bear the entire cost of
soliciting proxies from Express Scripts stockholders, except
that Express Scripts and Medco will share equally the expenses
incurred in connection with the printing and mailing of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and filing all soliciting
materials with the SEC. In addition to this mailing, Express
Scripts directors, officers and employees (who will not
receive any additional compensation for such services) may
solicit proxies. Solicitation of proxies will be undertaken
through the mail, in person, by telephone, the Internet and
videoconference.
Express Scripts will reimburse brokerage houses and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding proxy and solicitation materials to the
beneficial owners of Express Scripts common stock.
Other
Business
The Express Scripts board is not aware of any other business to
be acted upon at the special meeting. For additional information
on how business can be brought before a meeting, see Bylaw 1.12
of Express Scripts bylaws.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card or have
questions regarding Express Scripts special meeting,
please contact MacKenzie Partners Inc. by mail at 105 Madison
Avenue, New York, NY 10016, by telephone at
(800) 322-2885
(toll free) or
(212) 929-5500
(collect), or by email at proxy@mackenziepartners.com.
74
THE
MERGERS
General
On July 20, 2011, the Medco board and the Express Scripts
board each approved the merger agreement, attached hereto as
Annex A which provides for two separate mergers involving
Express Scripts and Medco, respectively. First, the merger
agreement provides for Express Scripts Merger Sub, a wholly
owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts, to merge with and into
Express Scripts, with Express Scripts surviving the merger as a
wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts. Second,
immediately following the consummation of the Express Scripts
merger, the merger agreement provides for the merger of Medco
Merger Sub, another wholly owned subsidiary of New Express
Scripts, with and into Medco, with Medco surviving the merger as
a wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts. As a result of
the mergers, both of the surviving entities of the Express
Scripts merger and the Medco merger will become wholly owned
subsidiaries of New Express Scripts, which will be a publicly
traded corporation. On November 7, 2011, Express Scripts,
New Express Scripts, Medco and the Merger Subs entered into the
first amendment to the merger agreement. You are encouraged to
read the merger agreement and the first amendment to the merger
agreement in their entirety because they are the legal documents
that govern the mergers.
At the effective time of the Medco merger, each share of Medco
common stock (other than Medco excluded shares) will be
converted into (i) the right to receive $28.80 in cash,
without interest and (ii) 0.81 shares of validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable of New Express Scripts
common stock. At the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger, each outstanding share of Express Scripts common stock
(other than Express Scripts excluded shares) will be converted
into one share of New Express Scripts common stock.
Background
of the Mergers
The management and boards of directors of Express Scripts and
Medco have regularly reviewed their respective companies
results of operations and competitive positions in the
industries in which they respectively operate as well as the
strategic options of their respective businesses in light of
economic and regulatory conditions, among other things,
including whether the continued execution of their respective
strategies as stand-alone companies or the possible sale to, or
a combination with, a third party offers the best avenue to
enhance stockholder value.
From time to time, these reviews of strategic options have led
representatives of Medco and Express Scripts to consider and
discuss the possibility of a business combination involving
Express Scripts and Medco. In 2006, representatives of Express
Scripts and representatives of Medco held preliminary
discussions regarding a potential business combination
transaction involving the companies. In connection with such
discussions, Express Scripts and Medco entered into a mutual
confidentiality agreement in November 2006. This confidentiality
agreement expired in accordance with its terms in November 2009.
Following these 2006 meetings, representatives of the two
companies occasionally contacted each other to discuss whether
the parties should re-explore a potential business combination;
however, such preliminary discussions regarding any such
business combination did not proceed further.
In connection with Medco senior managements and board of
directors ongoing review of Medcos strategic
direction, the evolving competitive landscape, and the need to
respond proactively to healthcare reform initiatives, beginning
in early February 2011, the Medco board determined to undertake
a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives to Medcos
stand-alone business plan. The strategic review was conducted
over the course of nine meetings of the Medco board and the
Mergers and Acquisitions Committee of the Medco board, which we
refer to as the Medco M&A committee, held between
February 1, 2011 and July 20, 2011. As part of the
strategic review, the Medco board and the Medco M&A
committee, assisted by Medcos senior management team and
Medcos financial advisors, J.P. Morgan Securities
LLC, which we refer to as J.P. Morgan, and Lazard
Frères & Co. LLC, which we refer to as Lazard,
and Medcos legal advisors, reviewed (among other things)
competition in the pharmacy benefit management sector generally,
the status of relationships with key Medco customers, valuation
trends for Medco and its competitors and the potential strategic
actions that Medco and Medcos competitors could be
expected to pursue in the near-, medium- and
75
long-term future, including potential business combinations and
other potential strategic transactions. The Medco board and the
Medco M&A committee, assisted by Medcos senior
management and J.P. Morgan and Lazard, and Medcos
legal advisors, reviewed and analyzed a number of potential
internal strategic measures and external strategic transactions
that were potentially available to Medco, as well as
Medcos stand-alone business plan and evolving changes and
potential changes in the pharmacy benefits management industry,
and considered the feasibility and potential benefits and risks
of each such possible measure or transaction, including any
regulatory risks that could be associated therewith. In
particular, the Medco board and the Medco M&A committee
considered the possibility of acquiring certain other companies,
combining Medco with certain other companies and potential joint
venture transactions with certain other companies. In connection
with their review of transactions in which Medco could be
combined with other companies, the Medco board and the Medco
M&A committee considered, with their financial and legal
advisors, the likelihood that such companies would have an
interest in such a transaction, the regulatory aspects of such a
transaction and the potential synergies and other factors
affecting the consideration that such other parties could be
prepared to pay. In particular, the Medco M&A committee and
Medcos management and its financial and antitrust advisors
conducted financial and antitrust analyses of potential business
combination transactions between Medco and each of CVS Caremark
and United Healthcare. The Medco board and the Medco M&A
committee also discussed the current state of capital markets,
interest rates and the potential reception by the equity markets
in response to further consolidation that could be caused by
some of the strategic transactions considered.
Throughout the strategic review process, senior management of
Medco kept the Medco board and the Medco M&A committee
apprised of the status of the negotiations between United
Healthcare and Medco regarding the renewal of Medcos
contract to provide pharmacy benefits management services to
United Healthcare or other strategic business arrangements, and
the Medco board and the Medco M&A committee considered
throughout the strategic review process the likelihood that such
negotiations would lead to a mutually satisfactory agreement.
Discussions with respect to a renewal of the United Healthcare
contract or an alternative arrangement took place with United
Healthcare before the merger agreement was executed.
Over the course of the strategic review, the analysis conducted
by the Medco board and the Medco M&A committee of all
feasible alternatives led to the conclusion that the option that
offered the best strategic alternative for delivering value to
Medcos stockholders was a combination of Medco with
Express Scripts. Among the reasons for this were
managements expectation that the merger with Express
Scripts had the potential to deliver over $1 billion in annual
synergies, the improbability of any other third party in the
pharmacy benefits management industry having the financial
resources to offer a more attractive alternative to Medco than a
potential combination with Express Scripts, and the fact that
Medcos standalone plan and all feasible acquisitions of
third-parties by Medco appeared to have less potential to
deliver synergies, premium and accretion value to Medcos
stockholders than a combination with Express Scripts. The Medco
board and the Medco M&A committee also considered the risks
to Medco of potential transactions that could occur in the near-
and medium-term between Express Scripts and other parties in the
pharmacy benefits management industry, including the risks to
Medcos position with respect to its current and potential
future customers and suppliers. At a June 8, 2011 meeting
of the Medco M&A committee, it was the opinion of the Medco
M&A committee that it was then the appropriate time to
initiate contact with Express Scripts regarding a potential
transaction and, accordingly, the Medco M&A committee
determined to discuss this matter with the full Medco board.
At a Medco board meeting held on June 9, 2011, the Medco
board, after detailed review and discussion of the status and
results of Medcos strategic review, authorized
Medcos chief executive officer, Mr. David B.
Snow, Jr., to contact Express Scripts chief executive
officer, Mr. George Paz, to discuss the possibility of a
business combination transaction between Express Scripts and
Medco.
On June 10, 2011, Mr. Snow telephoned Mr. Paz to
discuss the possibility of a business combination transaction.
Mr. Paz indicated that Express Scripts would be interested
in having further discussions regarding a potential transaction.
During this preliminary discussion between Mr. Paz and
Mr. Snow, the specific pricing terms and proposed structure
terms of any potential transaction were not discussed but the
parties discussed that the potential transaction would take the
form of an acquisition of Medco by Express Scripts.
Mr. Snow
76
and Mr. Paz agreed that the general counsel of Express
Scripts, Mr. Keith Ebling, and the general counsel of
Medco, Mr. Thomas Moriarty, should discuss the initial
process for Medco and Express Scripts to consider the potential
transaction. Later that day, Mr. Moriarty telephoned
Mr. Ebling to discuss the initial process by which Medco
and Express Scripts could evaluate the potential transaction,
including the need to analyze the regulatory considerations
relevant to a business combination and the need for a mutual
confidentiality agreement. Subsequent to this discussion,
Mr. Ebling informed representatives of Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, outside counsel to Express
Scripts, which we refer to as Skadden, that Express Scripts had
been approached by Medco and Express Scripts management
was considering a potential transaction involving Medco.
On June 11, 2011, Mr. Moriarty delivered a draft
mutual confidentiality agreement to Mr. Ebling. In the days
following this delivery, representatives of management of each
company, including Messrs. Ebling and Moriarty, as well as
Skadden, acting on behalf of Express Scripts, and
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, outside counsel to Medco,
which we refer to as Sullivan & Cromwell, acting on
behalf of Medco, negotiated the terms of such mutual
confidentiality agreement to permit the parties to determine
whether they wished to proceed towards a transaction. During the
course of these discussions, the companies determined that the
standstill provisions included in the initial draft of the
mutual confidentiality agreement would best be addressed at a
later date, but, in any event, prior to either company making
available any significant, business-related confidential
information. Messrs. Ebling and Moriarty also discussed the
need for the parties respective antitrust legal advisors
to discuss their analyses regarding the potential transaction.
The mutual confidentiality agreement was executed by the
companies on June 14, 2011.
On June 15, 2011, Messrs. Snow, Paz, Moriarty and
Ebling met at the offices of Dechert LLP, which we refer to as
Dechert, antitrust counsel to Medco, in Washington, D.C.
and discussed each partys interest in a transaction and
the general manner in which such discussions should proceed. At
such meeting, the parties agreed to make certain materials
available through an online data room and to make other,
potentially competitively sensitive materials available pursuant
to a customary clean-room arrangement. Following
this discussion, Messrs. Moriarty and Ebling and
representatives of Dechert and Skadden had discussions regarding
the potential transaction, including the regulatory approval
process and the filings that would be involved in connection
with any potential business combination. Representatives of
Dechert and Skadden continued to confer throughout the
negotiation of the potential transaction.
During this period, Mr. Paz made individual telephone calls
to the members of the Express Scripts board and briefed each on
the fact that Express Scripts had been approached by Medco. In
the course of these discussions, Mr. Paz indicated to the
directors that Express Scripts management would keep the
Express Scripts board apprised of the progress of discussions
with Medco, as well as of other strategic initiatives as they
may develop. Members of the Express Scripts board informed
Mr. Paz that management of Express Scripts should continue
to explore the potential transaction with Medco. Mr. Paz
also informed certain members of Express Scripts senior
staff of the potential business combination involving Medco
throughout this period.
During the period beginning on June 21, 2011 and extending
through the date of the execution of the merger agreement, the
parties conducted business due diligence investigations with
respect to each others business, legal, regulatory,
technology and other matters and held discussions concerning
their respective businesses and prospects and the potential
synergies and commercial benefits that could result from the
potential transaction. In addition, during that period, a number
of meetings of the Express Scripts board and its senior
management, and of the Medco board, the Medco M&A committee
and the Medco senior management, were held, as more fully
described throughout this section.
On June 22, 2011, members of Medcos and Express
Scripts senior management teams, including
Mr. Richard Rubino, the chief financial officer of Medco,
Mr. Jeffrey Hall, the chief financial officer of Express
Scripts, and Messrs. Ebling and Moriarty, discussed by
telephone the potential transaction. In addition,
Messrs. Moriarty and Ebling discussed the need for a mutual
standstill and exclusivity agreement as a condition to
Medcos provision of additional due diligence information
to Express Scripts in response to Express Scripts requests.
77
In late June 2011, Express Scripts contacted Credit Suisse to
discuss Credit Suisses ability to act as Express
Scripts financial advisor in connection with the potential
transaction and to develop a proposal with respect to the
financing of any such transaction, including making a
determination as to whether any additional financing sources
would be required in connection with such financing
arrangements. Express Scripts selected Credit Suisse because of
Credit Suisses qualifications, experience, reputation and
familiarity with Express Scripts, its business and industry,
evidenced by Credit Suisses providing prior investment
banking and other financial services to Express Scripts
unrelated to the potential transaction including, among other
engagements, acting as (i) joint book-running manager for a
$1.5 billion senior notes offering, a $2.5 billion
senior notes offering and an approximately $1.6 billion
common stock offering of Express Scripts, (ii) financial
advisor to Express Scripts in connection with Express
Scripts $4.675 billion acquisition of the NextRx
pharmacy benefit management services business of WellPoint, Inc.
and lead arranger for a related bridge term loan financing
undertaken by Express Scripts in connection therewith,
(iii) joint lead arranger and joint book-running manager
for, or administrative agent for and lender under, an existing
$750 million revolving credit facility of Express Scripts
and (iv) financial advisor to Express Scripts and co-dealer
manager in connection with the Express Scripts exchange offer
for Caremark Rx, Inc.
On June 28 and 29, 2011, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the
Express Scripts board, members of Express Scripts senior
management discussed with the Express Scripts board the
potential business combination involving Medco, including the
possible next steps relating thereto. The Express Scripts board
discussed at length the benefits and drawbacks of pursuing the
proposed transaction, including potential synergies which, in
the opinion of senior management, could be achieved through the
potential transaction, as well as the regulatory approvals
required to consummate the potential transaction. After
discussion, the Express Scripts board directed management to
move forward with discussions with Medco regarding a potential
transaction. Following the meeting, representatives of Express
Scripts management directed Skadden to prepare a draft
merger agreement relating to the proposed transaction.
On June 30, 2011, members of senior management of Medco and
Express Scripts, including Messrs. Rubino, Hall and Ebling
met in person in Columbus, Ohio to discuss, among other things,
the parties views on valuation generally, including the
possibility of premiums in the range of 20% to 30% of the
then-current market price of Medcos common stock, the
terms of a mutual standstill and exclusivity agreement and other
key transaction matters.
Also on June 30, 2011, the Medco M&A committee met
telephonically to review the status of discussions between the
parties concerning the potential transaction. Members of senior
management were in attendance and updated the Medco M&A
committee concerning the status of the discussions, including
with respect to the views on price, premium and estimated
synergies that had been expressed by Express Scripts to members
of Medco senior management. The Medco M&A committee also
discussed with management the status of negotiations with
Express Scripts regarding the entry into a mutual standstill and
exclusivity agreement. The Medco M&A committee also
discussed managements expectations regarding synergies and
certain transaction terms, including the mix of stock and cash
consideration, and the likelihood of any third parties being
prepared to offer a more attractive alternative. Following such
discussions, the Medco M&A committee authorized management
to proceed with negotiating and entering into a mutual
standstill and exclusivity agreement with Express Scripts in
order to continue due diligence and discussions with Express
Scripts regarding the potential transaction. Additionally, on
June 30, 2011, Skadden, acting on behalf of Express
Scripts, provided Sullivan & Cromwell, acting on
behalf of Medco, with a draft of such mutual standstill and
exclusivity agreement.
Express Scripts views with respect to valuation and the
appropriate mix of consideration were based, among other
factors, on a desire to include a significant cash component in
the consideration to be paid to Medco stockholders, resulting in
Express Scripts current stockholders maintaining a
majority of the equity holdings in New Express Scripts, the
ability of New Express Scripts to maintain an investment grade
rating and the optimization of the financing arrangements
available to Express Scripts and New Express Scripts in the
financial markets.
On July 1, 2011, Messrs. Rubino and Hall discussed by
telephone the potential synergies that could result from the
potential transaction, and the valuation and potential Medco
merger consideration. On the same date,
78
Messrs. Ebling and Moriarty telephonically discussed the
terms of a proposed standstill and exclusivity agreement between
Express Scripts and Medco.
From July 1 through July 4, 2011, Mr. Ebling and
Mr. Moriarty discussed by telephone on several occasions
the terms of a mutual standstill and exclusivity agreement. In
addition, Sullivan & Cromwell and Skadden had
discussions regarding the terms of the mutual standstill and
exclusivity agreement during that period.
During the week of July 4 to July 9, 2011, the parties
continued to discuss, via telephone conversations and email
exchanges, among other things, the due diligence process, the
parties respective financial positions and operations, the
possible benefits and risks of a combination and the course of
action for further analysis of potential synergies that could
result from the potential transaction.
On July 5, 2011, members of Express Scripts and
Medcos senior management, including Messrs. Hall,
Ebling, Rubino and Moriarty, met in Short Hills, New Jersey to
further discuss the businesses of the companies, the basis of
Express Scripts valuation of Medco common stock, the
appropriate mix of stock and cash consideration to be paid in
connection with the mergers, the regulatory approvals required
to consummate the mergers and the overall timeline for
proceeding with the potential transaction. Immediately preceding
this meeting, Express Scripts and Medco entered into the mutual
exclusivity and standstill agreement, pursuant to which each
party agreed not to solicit third party proposals from, or
provide confidential information to, certain third parties with
respect to mergers or acquisitions of its capital stock over a
certain threshold until August 15, 2011. In addition, the
mutual standstill and exclusivity agreement prohibited each of
Medco and Express Scripts and certain of their representatives
from acquiring or offering to acquire the others
securities or material assets or seeking to influence, change or
control the others management, board of directors,
governing instruments or policies until the earlier of
March 31, 2012 or the occurrence of certain change of
control transactions with respect to either party. The
limitations on acquiring ownership of the other partys
securities as well as the restrictions on soliciting third party
proposals contained in the mutual standstill and exclusivity
agreement terminated under certain circumstances specified
therein. Prior to the execution of the standstill and
exclusivity agreement, limited confidential material was made
available between the companies. Also, on July 5, 2011,
Express Scripts retained Holland & Knight LLP, which
we refer to as Holland & Knight, as its legal counsel
for certain health-care and insurance regulatory aspects of the
proposed transaction.
Antitrust counsel for each of Medco and Express Scripts executed
a written collective interest agreement on July 5, 2011
with respect to the exchange of confidential information.
From July 5 to July 12, 2011, members of senior management
of Medco and Express Scripts and their legal advisors discussed
on a number of occasions the establishment of, and the detailed
access procedures in connection with, a clean room
for the exchange and confidential analysis of certain sensitive
business data. During the period between July 5, 2011 and
July 12, 2011, members of senior management of each of
Express Scripts and Medco had numerous discussions regarding the
potential pricing of the proposed transaction. At the
July 5, 2011 meeting, Medco initially proposed a per share
price of $75.00 in a combination of stock and cash
consideration, based upon the combined company achieving
synergies of approximately $1 billion. After initial
discussions, the parties agreed to proceed with further
negotiation on the basis of an initial price range which valued
Medco common stock between $70.00 and $75.00 per share, subject
to Express Scripts satisfactory confirmation of its due
diligence investigations. On July 8, 2011, the parties
executed a clean room confidentiality agreement detailing the
terms, conditions and procedures for the clean room process. As
part of the clean room process, Express Scripts and Medco
jointly retained a third-party consultant to assist with their
analysis of certain business data based on certain sample data
selected by Express Scripts and Medco and provided in the clean
room. The third party-consultants activities were limited
to the performance of mathematical calculations based on such
data and based upon a methodology mutually determined by Express
Scripts and Medco.
On July 8, 2011, the Medco board met telephonically to
discuss the status and progress of the potential transaction.
Together with senior management and Medcos external
financial and legal advisors, the Medco board reviewed the
chronology of events since the previous Medco board meeting and
the various workstreams
79
engaged in the proposed transaction, including the due
diligence review, the clean room process, regulatory analysis,
and the discussions with Express Scripts regarding synergies,
valuation, pricing and premium. Representatives of
J.P. Morgan and Lazard discussed with the Medco board
preliminary financial analyses of a potential transaction with
Express Scripts assuming indicative prices, mixes of stock and
cash consideration, synergies and capital structures. Among
other things, the Medco board considered and discussed with its
financial advisors the proposed leverage (debt to EBITDA) ratio
for the combined company, the accretion to Medco stockholders at
indicative prices and at different ratios of stock and cash
consideration, value creation sensitivities pertaining to the
New Express Scripts stock in light of the fact that Medco
stockholders would become New Express Scripts stockholders
following the mergers, and the value creation sensitivities
relative to synergies, price-to-earnings multiples and other
variables. In addition, representatives of Sullivan &
Cromwell discussed with the Medco board its fiduciary duties and
reviewed the process that the Medco board had undertaken to
review strategic alternatives. Representatives of Dechert
reviewed with the Medco board the process undertaken and
information exchanged to date with respect to antitrust matters.
Medco and Express Scripts also activated their virtual datarooms
for the other party to view on this date.
On July 8, 2011, at a special meeting of the Express
Scripts board, members of Express Scripts senior
management discussed with the Express Scripts board the
potential business combination involving Medco, including
possible next steps relating thereto. The Express Scripts
management also provided the Express Scripts board with an
update regarding the potential timeline to signing a definitive
agreement relating to the proposed transaction, the process for
conducting due diligence on Medco and proposed financing for the
potential transaction. In addition, the Express Scripts board
and management team discussed the regulatory approvals which
would be required to consummate the potential transaction.
On July 10, 2011, Express Scripts, through Skadden,
delivered an initial draft of the merger agreement to Medco,
through Sullivan & Cromwell. While the parties had
previously had preliminarily discussions about the appropriate
mix of consideration that would result in Medco stockholders
ultimately receiving 60% of the consideration in the Medco
merger as New Express Scripts stock and 40% of such
consideration as cash, the initial draft merger agreement did
not propose specific allocations for this mix. However, the
initial draft merger agreement did raise the possibility that
Express Scripts would have the ability to elect, in its sole
discretion, to modify the relative mix of stock and cash
consideration to be received by the Medco stockholders upon the
consummation of the proposed transaction at any time prior to
such consummation, both prior to and following a vote on the
merger agreement by Medco and Express Scripts stockholders. In
addition, the initial draft merger agreement contained a ratings
condition with respect to the obligations of Express Scripts to
consummate the mergers and contemplated the creation of a
holding company which would be the ultimate parent company of
each of Express Scripts and Medco following the mergers.
From July 10, 2011 until execution of definitive
documentation on July 20, 2011, the companies and their
respective advisors exchanged numerous drafts of the merger
agreement and engaged in negotiations and discussions regarding
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement. Significant
areas of negotiation included the scope and degree of
reciprocity of representations and warranties and interim
operating covenants, the conditions to closing, the degree of
conditionality associated with Express Scripts proposed
financing of the cash portion of the Medco merger consideration,
the scope of the parties obligations in connection with
obtaining regulatory approvals, including antitrust approvals,
the terms upon which Medco and Express Scripts could consider an
alternative acquisition proposal and the process for dealing
with any such proposal and the amount and triggers for the
reimbursement of expenses and the payment of termination fees,
which were reciprocal. The parties discussed extensively whether
Medco and Express Scripts would be permitted to terminate the
merger agreement to accept a superior proposal or would be
required to submit the merger agreement to a vote of its
stockholders, even if it received such a proposal. The parties
also discussed various employee benefit and other employee- and
compensation-related provisions of the merger agreement.
Concurrent with these discussions, representatives of management
of each of the companies, Skadden, Holland & Knight,
Sullivan & Cromwell, Dechert and the companies
respective other representatives continued to have numerous
discussions in person and by teleconference to review and
discuss, among other things, due diligence, valuation, the
companies respective financial information including
financial projections and related assumptions,
80
the results of the synergy analysis, Express Scripts
proposed financing for the potential transaction, antitrust and
other regulatory considerations, the terms of the merger
agreement and the timeline for the potential transaction.
On July 11, 2011, representatives of Express Scripts met
telephonically with representatives of Standard &
Poors Rating Services to discuss the indicative credit
rating of the combined company which would likely result from
the proposed transaction.
On July 11, 2011, Express Scripts contacted Citigroup to
discuss Citigroups ability to act, with Credit Suisse, as
Express Scripts financial advisor in connection with the
potential transaction and to develop a proposal with respect to
the financing of any such transaction. Representatives of
Express Scripts management and Citigroup discussed
Citigroups ability to deliver a fairness opinion on the
contemplated timetable and Citigroup gave Express Scripts
assurances that the contemplated timetable provided Citigroup
with sufficient time to conduct its analysis and deliver an
informed opinion. Express Scripts contacted Citigroup because of
Citigroups familiarity with Express Scripts, its business
and industry, evidenced by Citigroups prior investment
banking and other financial services to Express Scripts
unrelated to the potential transaction including, among other
engagements, having acted as (i) Express Scripts
financial advisor in connection with its acquisition of
WellPoint Inc.s NextRx subsidiaries announced in April
2009, including, in connection therewith, serving as joint
bookrunner on Express Scripts 5.25% Senior Notes due
2012 (aggregate principal amount $1.0 billion),
6.250% Senior Notes due 2014 (aggregate principal amount
$1.0 billion) and 7.250% Senior Notes due 2019
(aggregate principal amount $500.0 million), and joint
bookrunner on Express Scripts $1.6 billion follow-on
offering of shares of Express Scripts common stock;
(ii) joint lead arranger and syndication agent, and a
participant in, Express Scripts $750.0 million
revolving credit facility; (iii) joint bookrunner with
respect to Express Scripts 3.125% Senior Notes due
2016 (aggregate principal amount $1.5 billion) and
(iv) financial advisor to Express Scripts and co-dealer
manager in connection with Express Scripts exchange offer
for Caremark Rx, Inc. Express Scripts and Citigroup executed an
engagement letter on July 20, 2011. In addition, Express
Scripts management believed that Express Scripts would
require a second lead financing source, in addition to Credit
Suisse, given the amount of contemplated financing and that it
would be beneficial to have that second lead financing source
also act as a financial advisor in connection with the potential
transaction.
From July 10, 2011 through July 13, 2011,
representatives of Medco, Sullivan & Cromwell and
Dechert reviewed and revised the initial draft of the merger
agreement. On July 13, 2011, Medco delivered a revised
draft of the merger agreement, including changes with respect to
the termination rights of the parties, the various
representations and warranties included in the merger agreement,
and eliminating the
force-the-vote
provision that Express Scripts had proposed and replacing it
with a right for either party to terminate the merger agreement
(and concurrently pay a termination fee) in favor of entering
into a definitive agreement relating to, or consummating, a
superior proposal. The revised Medco draft also provided for an
agreement from Express Scripts to use its best efforts to obtain
regulatory approval for the proposed transaction, provided for
specific performance of Express Scripts financing
obligations and eliminated the credit ratings condition.
Furthermore, the revised Medco draft eliminated the ability of
Express Scripts to elect to modify the relative mix of stock and
cash consideration to be received by the Medco stockholders upon
the consummation of the proposed transaction at any time prior
to such consummation.
During the period from July 10, 2011 to July 20, 2011,
Express Scripts negotiated a debt commitment letter with Credit
Suisse AG (in its capacity as a financing source to Express
Scripts), Credit Suisse (in its capacity as arranger of
financing for Express Scripts), and Citibank, N.A. (in its
capacity as a financing source to Express Scripts and as
arranger of financing for Express Scripts) for a bridge loan
facility to Express Scripts to finance the cash portion of the
consideration payable in the proposed transaction.
On July 13, 2011, representatives of Express Scripts met in
person with representatives of Moodys Investors Service to
discuss the indicative credit rating of the combined company
which would likely result from the proposed transaction.
From July 13, 2011 through July 16, 2011, Express
Scripts and Skadden reviewed and revised the draft merger
agreement.
81
On July 14, 2011, results of the third-party
consultants calculations were provided to Medco and
Express Scripts.
On July 15, 2011, the Express Scripts board met
telephonically to deliberate further on the proposed
transaction, with representatives of senior management, Skadden
and Credit Suisse also present. At the meeting, representatives
of senior management presented a strategic and financial
overview of the proposed transaction and reviewed potential
financing strategies for the proposed transaction.
Representatives of senior management also provided an overview
of the preliminary terms of the merger agreement, the outcome of
the diligence investigations conducted thus far and responded to
questions from directors. The Express Scripts board also
discussed with senior management the likelihood of the combined
company maintaining an investment grade credit rating and the
risks associated therewith and ways to mitigate such risks.
Representatives of Skadden discussed in detail the Express
Scripts boards fiduciary duties and responsibilities and
the standards that the Express Scripts board should consider in
evaluating the proposed transaction. Representatives of Skadden
also provided an overview of the current terms of the merger
agreement and responded to questions and comments from
directors. The Express Scripts board also discussed with Credit
Suisse, among other things, financial aspects of the proposed
transaction and the current industry landscape.
On July 15, 2011, the Medco board met telephonically.
Together with management and Medcos external financial and
legal advisors, the Medco board reviewed the developments that
had taken place since the last Medco board meeting, the status
of negotiations with United Healthcare for a renewal and/or
restructuring of the United Healthcare contract, the proposed
terms of the Express Scripts transaction and the significant
issues that remained to be negotiated. In particular, the Medco
board reviewed the status of discussions regarding closing
conditionality, financing matters and transaction structure and
the reciprocal conditions and rights regarding termination. The
Medco board emphasized providing the maximum degree of
certainty, including regulatory certainty, regarding the closing
of the proposed transaction that could reasonably be obtained.
The Medco board also discussed the due diligence that each of
Medco and Express Scripts had performed on the other up to that
point, the number of board seats in a combined company that
former Medco directors should occupy and the status of valuation
discussions with Express Scripts. Following detailed discussion,
the Medco board directed management to continue discussions and
to seek transaction terms and conditions offering greater
closing certainty than had been reflected in Express
Scripts previous proposals.
On July 16, 2011 and July 17, 2011, representatives of
Express Scripts, Medco, Skadden and Sullivan &
Cromwell met in person at the New York offices of Skadden to
continue to negotiate the terms of the merger agreement and on
the 18th, 19th and 20th of July 2011, the parties had numerous
telephone calls to continue to negotiate the terms of the merger
agreement telephonically. During these meetings and calls, the
parties discussed several possible transaction structures.
Representatives of Express Scripts informed Medco that Express
Scripts preferred the holding company structure for a number of
reasons, including the operational flexibility it would provide
the combined company, and the parties agreed to this structure.
Furthermore, based on Express Scripts conversations with
Moodys Investors Service and Standard and Poors
Rating Services, Express Scripts determined that
eliminating the credit ratings condition was an acceptable risk,
provided that the mix of consideration to be received by Medco
stockholders be fixed at 60% stock of New Express Scripts and
40% cash. At Medcos insistence, the parties also agreed to
mutual termination rights upon entering into a superior proposal
with a third party, in the place of a mutual force the vote
provision that would have required both parties to submit the
merger agreement proposal to a vote of their respective
stockholders even in the event that a competing proposal had
been made prior to the date of the stockholder meeting. In
return for such agreement, Express Scripts insisted that it have
a meaningful period of time to match a superior proposal made by
a third party, including the time necessary to raise any
additional financing. During the course of these discussions,
representatives of Medco proposed that the board of directors of
the combined entity include two or three directors currently
serving on the Medco board. During this period, the parties also
discussed certain actions that each party would agree to take in
connection with obtaining required regulatory approvals from the
applicable governmental authorities.
Over the course of the negotiations with Express Scripts, the
Medco board and Medcos senior management considered the
appropriateness of the 60%/40% mix of stock and cash
consideration in light of the following factors: the fact that
the cash portion would provide a measure of value certainty and
the fact that the stock portion would provide Medco stockholders
with an opportunity to participate in any value creation as a
result of the
82
transaction; the fact that Express Scripts expected to finance
a significant portion of the cash consideration and the impact
of potential changes in conditions in the financing markets;
senior managements view, based on discussions with Express
Scripts, of various alternate structures for the transaction;
that Express Scripts did not articulate a willingness to
significantly alter the mix of stock and cash portion of the
consideration from a 60%/40% ratio; and the tax implications to
Medco stockholders of various mixes of consideration.
Throughout the weekend of July 16, 2011 and into the week
beginning July 17, Medco and Express Scripts conducted
numerous due diligence conference calls regarding one
anothers businesses, including discussions regarding
outstanding legal actions involving Medco and Express Scripts
and, on July 17 and 18, 2011, due diligence calls with each of
their respective auditors and advisors.
On July 18, 2011, the full Express Scripts board met
telephonically with representatives of senior management,
Skadden, Credit Suisse, and Citigroup also present.
Representatives of senior management and Skadden provided the
Express Scripts board with an update regarding the negotiation
of a definitive merger agreement and responded to questions and
comments from the Express Scripts board. Senior management also
provided an overview of its financial analysis of the proposed
transaction and reviewed the status of discussions around the
various financing strategies available to fund the proposed
transaction. The Express Scripts board also discussed the
potential benefits that the proposed transaction would provide
to Express Scripts stockholders, communications strategy and the
challenges that could be encountered in connection with
obtaining regulatory approval for the proposed transaction.
Credit Suisse and Citigroup then each discussed with the Express
Scripts board financial matters relating to the proposed
transaction and various financing strategies under discussion.
The Express Scripts board also continued its discussion from the
July 15 meeting regarding the proposed corporate, regulatory and
governance structure of the combined entity that would result
from the proposed transaction, including the steps required, if
necessary, by the merger agreement to obtain the regulatory
approvals in order to consummate the proposed transaction.
Following these discussions, the Express Scripts board
authorized management to agree that the combined entitys
board of directors would include two independent directors
currently serving on the Medco board. Although the merger
agreement provides for two of Medcos independent directors
to join the New Express Scripts board, there were no discussions
between Medco and Express Scripts regarding any specific
directors or the continued future employment with New Express
Scripts of any specific executive officers prior to the
execution of the merger agreement.
On July 18, 2011, Messrs. Snow, Paz, Rubino and Hall
negotiated the Medco merger consideration in the amount of
$28.80 in cash and 0.81 shares of New Express Scripts
common stock per share of Medco common stock and, given that the
ownership interest of the Medco stockholders following
completion of the proposed transaction would be approximately
40%, discussed Medcos proposal to include two or three
independent members of the Medco board on the board of directors
of New Express Scripts following the consummation of the
proposed transaction.
On July 18, 2011, Skadden, acting on behalf of Express
Scripts, provided to Sullivan & Cromwell, acting on
behalf of Medco, a draft debt commitment letter from Credit
Suisse and Citibank, N.A. for a $14 billion
364-day
bridge term loan credit facility to finance the cash component
of the Medco merger consideration to be paid to Medcos
stockholders. Medco and its external legal and financial
advisors provided comments on the draft debt commitment letter.
On July 19, 2011, the full Express Scripts board held a
meeting in person with representatives of senior management,
Skadden, Credit Suisse, and Citigroup also present. Skadden
provided the Express Scripts board members with an update
regarding the final negotiations of a definitive merger
agreement and made a presentation with respect to the
directors fiduciary duties. Representatives of Skadden
also reviewed the regulatory approvals required by the proposed
transaction and the commitments that would be made by the
parties under the proposed merger agreement to obtain such
approvals. Senior management briefed the Express Scripts board
on discussions with ratings agencies regarding the indicative
ratings of the combined companys indebtedness, as well as
updating the Express Scripts board with respect to senior
managements financial analysis of the proposed transaction
and the various financing strategies available to fund the
proposed transaction. Credit Suisse and Citigroup each updated
the Express Scripts board as to certain financial terms of the
proposed transaction based on the most recent negotiations of a
definitive merger agreement and financing
83
strategies available to fund the proposed transaction. The
Express Scripts board also discussed the benefits that the
proposed transaction could provide, the challenges that would be
encountered in combining the cultures and operations of the
companies, the legal status of the combined entities and the
regulatory approvals required to consummate the mergers.
On July 19, 2011, the Medco board met telephonically to
discuss the status and progress of the proposed transaction with
Express Scripts. Together with management and Medcos
external financial and legal advisors, the Medco board reviewed
the developments that had taken place since the last Medco board
meeting, including the progress that had been made in
negotiations with Express Scripts. Representatives of
Sullivan & Cromwell described the material terms of
the proposed transaction and the merger agreement and the status
of the issues remaining to be agreed upon, which the Medco board
discussed in detail. In addition, representatives of Dechert
discussed the antitrust provisions in the merger agreement, the
reasons for such provisions and their related antitrust
analysis. Representatives of senior management then updated the
Medco board on the discussion on price and presented the
proposed Medco merger consideration of $28.80 in cash and
0.81 shares of New Express Scripts common stock per share
of Medco common stock. The Medco board and representatives of
J.P. Morgan and Lazard discussed the joint financial
analyses of J.P. Morgan and Lazard, a preliminary analysis
of the Medco merger consideration and the effects that changes
in the stock price of Express Scripts could have on the Medco
merger consideration following signing of the merger agreement,
and a preliminary analysis of the premium represented by the
Medco merger consideration. The Medco board, along with its
legal and financial advisors, also reviewed and discussed
(i) the various strategic alternatives (including
Medcos stand-alone plan) that the Medco board had
considered up to that point, including the likelihood of any
third parties having an interest in offering, or being prepared
to offer, a more attractive alternative to a transaction with
Express Scripts, (ii) the relative advantages and
disadvantages of a transaction with Express Scripts in
comparison to such strategic alternatives and (iii) the
business and strategic risks and opportunities associated with
the various alternatives, including any regulatory risks
associated therewith. As a result of such discussions, the Medco
board determined that the proposed transaction with Express
Scripts offered greater value to Medcos stockholders than
the other strategic alternatives considered. The Medco board
also discussed, together with J.P. Morgan, Lazard and
Sullivan & Cromwell, Express Scripts proposed
financing for the proposed transaction, including Express
Scripts financing commitments, the likelihood that Express
Scripts would be able to maintain an investment grade rating in
connection with the financing, the absence of a financing
condition to the consummation of the proposed transaction, the
alternatives that would be available to Express Scripts if debt
financing was not available and the effects that such
alternatives would have on Medco stockholders. In addition,
representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell discussed with
the Medco board its fiduciary duties and reviewed the process
that the Medco board had undertaken to fulfill its fiduciary
duties, as well as the provisions of the merger agreement
permitting the Medco board to enter into a superior proposal and
the related reciprocal termination provisions and fees. The
Medco board continued to emphasize providing the maximum degree
of certainty, including regulatory certainty, regarding the
closing of the proposed transaction that could reasonably be
obtained.
On July 19, 2011 and July 20, 2011, Express Scripts,
Medco and their respective representatives continued to
negotiate the terms of a definitive merger agreement. The
parties agreed that each party would, in certain circumstances,
be responsible for paying the other party a termination fee in
the amount of $950 million or, in other circumstances,
$332.5 million and, in certain circumstances, be
responsible for reimbursing the other partys expenses in
an amount of up to either $225 million or
$100 million, which would be the parties exclusive
remedy, except in certain specified circumstances, in each case,
as described more fully below under The Merger
Agreement Termination Fees; Expenses beginning
on page 178. In addition, during the course of July 19 and
July 20, Express Scripts and Medco agreed to certain
actions that each party would agree to take in connection with
obtaining applicable regulatory approvals to the consummation of
the mergers. The parties also compromised on a number of
additional provisions in the merger agreement including in
relation to the parties respective obligations in connection
with financing the proposed mergers and the termination rights
and fees which may be payable in connection therewith.
On July 20, 2011, the full Express Scripts board held a
telephonic meeting, at which representatives of senior
management, Skadden, Credit Suisse and Citigroup were in
attendance. Senior management provided an
84
update with respect to negotiations with Medco, and updated the
Express Scripts board regarding senior managements
financial review of the proposed transaction and the
contemplated financing. Express Scripts general counsel
and representatives from Skadden then summarized the terms of
the merger agreement and the remaining open items to be
finalized with Medco. Credit Suisse and Citigroup reviewed with
the Express Scripts board their respective financial analysis of
the Medco merger consideration to be issued and paid by New
Express Scripts and rendered to the Express Scripts board an
oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated
July 20, 2011, to the effect that, as of that date and
based on and subject to the matters, considerations and
limitations described in the opinion and the work performed by
such firm and other factors it deemed relevant, the Medco merger
consideration to be issued and paid by New Express Scripts was
fair, from a financial point of view, to Express Scripts. The
Express Scripts board also considered the factors described
under Recommendation of the Express Scripts Board; Express
Scripts Reasons for the Mergers beginning on
page 105, as well as regulatory approval risks, the process
of SEC review, the financing requirements of the proposed
transaction and the various risks, such as non-consummation of
the mergers and the failure of achieving the contemplated
synergies, arising in connection with the proposed transaction.
Following such deliberations, the Express Scripts board
unanimously approved the proposed transaction on the terms set
forth in the draft merger agreement, determined that the
transactions contemplated thereby are fair to, advisable and in
the best interests of Express Scripts and resolved to recommend
that Express Scripts stockholders vote to adopt the merger
agreement. The Express Scripts board then instructed
senior management to finalize the transaction documents and
enter into the merger agreement consistent with its instructions.
On July 20, 2011, the Medco board met in person at
Medcos headquarters in Franklin Lakes, New Jersey to
discuss the terms of the proposed transaction and the merger
agreement and the developments since the previous day. Together
with management and Medcos external financial and legal
advisors, the Medco board reviewed the results of senior
managements financial and legal due diligence analysis and
the terms of the proposed transaction. Medcos general
counsel and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell
updated the Medco board on the negotiations with Express Scripts
since the previous Medco board meeting and reviewed with the
Medco board the material terms of the merger agreement.
Representatives of Dechert then discussed the antitrust
regulatory analysis that they performed in connection with the
proposed transaction and the related terms of the merger
agreement. Members of senior management and senior internal
legal counsel reviewed with the Medco board the results of their
due diligence analysis of Express Scripts. In addition, senior
management reviewed with the Medco board the compensation
provisions of the merger agreement. Representatives of each of
J.P. Morgan and Lazard discussed their financial analyses
of the Medco merger consideration. Following discussion,
(i) representatives of J.P. Morgan rendered the oral
opinion of J.P. Morgan, which was subsequently confirmed in
writing on the same day, that, as of July 20, 2011, and
subject to the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications
and limitations set forth in the written opinion, the Medco
merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view,
to Medcos stockholders and (ii) representatives of
Lazard stated the opinion of Lazard, which was subsequently
confirmed in writing, that, as of July 20, 2011, and
subject to the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications
and limitations set forth in the written opinion, the Medco
merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view,
to Medcos stockholders (with no opinion expressed as to
Medco subsidiaries and certain other Medco-affiliated holders
and holders who are entitled to and properly demand an appraisal
of their shares of Medco common stock). The J.P. Morgan and
Lazard opinions are more fully described under the
section Opinions of the Financial Advisors to
Medco beginning on page 90. Following extensive
discussion of all of the foregoing by the Medco board, the Medco
board approved the merger agreement and the consummation of the
Medco merger upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Medco merger, determined that the terms of the
merger agreement, the Medco merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, and in the
best interests of, Medco and its stockholders, directed that the
merger agreement be submitted to the stockholders of Medco for
adoption, recommended that Medcos stockholders adopt the
merger agreement and declared that the merger agreement is
advisable.
After execution of the debt commitment letter, a copy of which
was provided to Medco and its financial and legal advisors, each
of Express Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts and the Merger
Subs executed and delivered the merger agreement, effective as
of July 20, 2011. On the morning of July 21, 2011,
Express Scripts and Medco issued a joint press release
announcing the transaction.
85
Following the announcement by the parties that they had entered
into the merger agreement on July 21, 2011, certain
putative stockholder class action lawsuits were filed by
purported stockholders of Medco challenging the mergers. The
complaints in the actions name as defendants Medco
and/or
various members of the Medco board as well as Express Scripts,
New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs. Medco and Express
Scripts continue to deny that they engaged in any of the
wrongdoing alleged in the complaints; however, to avoid the risk
that the litigation might delay or otherwise adversely affect
the consummation of the merger and to minimize the expense of
defending such actions, on November 7, 2011, Express
Scripts and Medco entered into a memorandum of understanding
with plaintiffs to settle the stockholder litigation pending in
the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
and the Delaware Court of Chancery regarding the mergers.
Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, Express Scripts and
Medco entered into the first amendment to the merger agreement
and agreed to hold the special meetings of their respective
stockholders to vote on the proposed mergers on such date or
dates as determined by Medco and Express Scripts, but in no
event prior to December 21, 2011. Express Scripts and Medco
also agreed to include certain additional disclosures concerning
the merger agreement in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
On November 7, 2011, the Medco board determined that the
memorandum of understanding, the settlement of the stockholders
litigation on the terms contemplated by the memorandum of
understanding, and the proposed amendments to the merger
agreement were in the best interests of Medco and unanimously
voted to approve the memorandum of understanding and the first
amendment to the merger agreement and recommended that
Medcos stockholders adopt the merger agreement as so
amended. On November 7, 2011, the Express Scripts board
concluded that the memorandum of understanding and the proposed
amendments to the merger agreement were in the best interests of
Express Scripts and its stockholders, and unanimously voted to
approve and authorize the memorandum of understanding and first
amendment to the merger agreement. On November 7, 2011,
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts, the Merger Subs and Medco
executed the first amendment to the merger agreement, in order
to effect the terms contemplated by the memorandum of
understanding.
Recommendation
of the Medco Board; Medcos Reasons for the
Merger
At its meeting held on July 20, 2011, the Medco board
unanimously (i) approved the merger agreement and
consummation of the Medco merger upon the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(ii) determined that the terms of the merger agreement, the
Medco merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement are fair to, and in the best interests of,
Medco and its stockholders, (iii) directed that the merger
agreement be submitted to Medco stockholders for adoption at the
Medco special meeting, (iv) recommended that Medcos
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and (v) declared
that the merger agreement is advisable. In addition, on November
7, 2011, the Medco board approved the first amendment to the
merger agreement and recommended that Medcos stockholders
adopt the merger agreement as so amended.
ACCORDINGLY, THE MEDCO BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT
MEDCO STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO
ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT, FOR THE PROPOSAL TO
APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING (IF IT IS
NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE
ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT) AND
FOR THE PROPOSAL TO APPROVE, BY NON-BINDING
ADVISORY VOTE, CERTAIN COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR
MEDCOS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE
MERGERS CONTEMPLATED BY THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
The Medco board consulted with Medcos outside financial
and legal advisors and senior management at various times and
considered a number of factors, including the following
principal factors that the Medco board and the Medco M&A
committee believe support such declarations, approvals,
resolutions and recommendations:
|
|
|
|
|
the Medco boards knowledge of Medcos business,
financial condition, results of operations, on both historical
and prospective bases, and its understanding of Express
Scripts business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects;
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
the current industry, economic and market conditions and the
risks for Medco on a stand-alone basis in a consolidating,
competitive industry;
|
|
|
|
the need to be proactive in responding to current and
contemplated healthcare reform initiatives;
|
|
|
|
the facts that the cost savings synergies anticipated to result
from the combination of Medcos and Express Scripts
businesses are expected to be at least $1 billion, that the
combined company is estimated to be able to deliver more than
$4 billion of annual cash from operations, and that the
0.81 fixed exchange ratio provides Medco stockholders with
participation in the earnings of the combined company, which
will be enhanced as synergies and other efficiencies arising
from the mergers are realized over time and the combined company
pursues and capitalizes on strategic opportunities that can be
achieved with its substantial cash flows;
|
|
|
|
the Medco boards evaluation, over the course of nine
(9) telephonic and in person meetings from February 1,
2011 to July 20, 2011, of all feasible alternatives to a
sale to Express Scripts, including senior managements
stand-alone plan and potential business combinations and joint
ventures with other parties, which alternatives the Medco board
evaluated with the assistance of its antitrust legal advisors
and its financial advisors, J.P. Morgan and Lazard, and
determined were likely to be less favorable to Medcos
stockholders than the transaction with Express Scripts, given
the potential risks, rewards and uncertainties associated with
those alternatives;
|
|
|
|
input from the Medco M&A committee, which consisted of five
(5) independent directors and met, along with Medcos
financial and legal advisors, in person or telephonically, five
(5) times between April 4, 2011 and June 30, 2011;
|
|
|
|
the value of the Medco merger consideration, which, based on the
$52.54 per share closing price for Express Scripts common stock
on July 20, 2011, represented a notional value of $71.36
per share of Medco common stock and represented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 28% premium to the closing price per share for Medco common
stock on July 20, 2011;
|
|
|
|
a 29% premium to the average closing price for Medco common
stock on the NYSE for the one (1) month preceding
July 20, 2011;
|
|
|
|
a 22% premium to the average closing price for Medco common
stock on the NYSE for the three (3) months preceding
July 20, 2011; and
|
|
|
|
a 21% premium to the average closing price for Medco common
stock on the NYSE for the six (6) months preceding
July 20, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Medco common stock has been trading at a lower
price-to-earnings
multiple than some of its peers, including Express Scripts, and
the likelihood that such discount would make it challenging for
Medco to compete with Express Scripts and other third parties in
acquisitions of potential target companies in the pharmacy
benefit management industry;
|
|
|
|
the probability that it could take a considerable period of time
before the trading price of the Medco common stock on a
stand-alone basis would reach and sustain at least the $71.36
notional value of the per share Medco merger consideration, as
adjusted for present value;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the $28.80 per share of cash consideration
provides Medco stockholders with a degree of value certainty
with respect to that portion of the Medco merger consideration;
|
|
|
|
the continued participation of Medco stockholders in a combined
company that will be able to provide an attractive mix of
services to customers via increased mail order penetration and
greater utilization of generics and the expectation that the
combined company will capitalize on a diversified customer base
covering the spectrum from large managed care organizations to
small- to medium-sized employers and the complementary strengths
of Express Scripts and Medco in clinical, specialty pharmacy
services, research, the behavioral sciences, pharmacy
technology, and overall patient care;
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts and Medcos records of successfully
integrating past acquisitions without sacrificing growth;
|
|
|
|
the analyses of J.P. Morgan and the oral opinion of
J.P. Morgan, rendered on July 20, 2011 and
subsequently confirmed in writing on the same day, to the Medco
board that, as of July 20, 2011 and subject to the
assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations
set forth in the written opinion, the Medco merger consideration
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Medcos
stockholders. See Opinions of Financial
Advisors to Medco, below;
|
|
|
|
the analyses of Lazard and the opinion of Lazard, rendered on
July 20, 2011 and subsequently confirmed in writing, to the
Medco board that, subject to the assumptions, procedures,
factors, qualifications and limitations set forth in the written
opinion, the Medco merger consideration was fair, from a
financial point of view, to Medcos stockholders (with no
opinion expressed as to Medco subsidiaries and certain other
Medco-affiliated holders). See Opinions of
Financial Advisors to Medco, below;
|
|
|
|
the likelihood that the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will be consummated, based on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the closing conditions to the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the fact that the obligations of
Express Scripts under the merger agreement are not subject to a
financing condition;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Express Scripts had obtained committed debt
financing for the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement with limited conditions to financing from reputable
financing sources and the obligation of Express Scripts pursuant
to the merger agreement to use its reasonable best efforts to
obtain the debt financing; and
|
|
|
|
the commitments made by Express Scripts in the merger agreement
with respect to obtaining regulatory clearances, including with
respect to the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, and the absence of other
significant required regulatory approvals necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Medco boards view, after consultation with its legal
counsel, concerning the likelihood that regulatory approvals and
clearances necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement would be obtained;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and the course
of negotiations of the merger agreement, including, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Medco board, under certain circumstances, to
change, qualify, withhold, withdraw or modify its recommendation
to stockholders concerning the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Medco board to terminate the merger agreement
to enter into a superior proposal, subject to certain conditions
(including certain rights of Express Scripts to have an
opportunity to match the superior proposal) and the payment of
the termination fee, as described under The Merger
Agreement Termination Fees; Expenses beginning
on page 178; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the rights of Medco stockholders who are entitled to demand and
properly demand appraisal of their shares pursuant to, and who
comply in all respects with, Section 262 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law to receive payment of the fair
value of such shares.
|
The Medco board also weighed the factors described above against
the following factors and risks that generally weighed against
entering into the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that because a substantial portion of the Medco merger
consideration is New Express Scripts stock and the exchange
ratio is fixed, Medco stockholders will be adversely affected by
any decrease in
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
the sale price of Express Scripts common stock between the
announcement and the completion of the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of Medcos business prior
to the completion of the proposed merger, which may delay or
prevent Medco from undertaking business opportunities that may
arise or other actions it would otherwise take with respect to
the operations of Medco pending completion of the proposed
merger;
|
|
|
|
the difficulty inherent in integrating diverse businesses and
the risk that the cost savings, synergies and other benefits
expected to be obtained in the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement might not be fully realized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the termination fee to be paid to Express Scripts
under the circumstances specified in the merger agreement, which
as a percentage of the equity value of Medco is within a
customary range for similar transactions, may discourage other
parties that might otherwise have an interest in a business
combination with, or an acquisition of, Medco (see the section
entitled The Merger Agreement Termination
Fees; Expenses beginning on page 178 of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger agreement placing limitations on the
ability of Medco to solicit alternative business combination
transactions and to provide confidential due diligence
information to, or engage in discussions with, a third party
interested in pursuing an alternative business combination
transaction (see the section entitled The Merger
Agreement No Solicitation beginning on
page 164 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of time it could take to complete the mergers,
including the fact that completion of the mergers depends on
factors outside of Medcos control;
|
|
|
|
the possibility of significant costs and delays resulting from
seeking regulatory approvals necessary to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the
possibility of non-consummation of such transactions if such
approvals are not obtained, and the potential negative impacts
on Medco, its business and its stock price in the event that
such approvals are not obtained;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that if the proposed merger is not completed, Medco
will be required to pay its own expenses associated with the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and
may be required to reimburse certain of Express Scripts
expenses
and/or pay
the termination fee under certain circumstances, as described
under The Merger Agreement Termination Fees;
Expenses beginning on page 178; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risks described in the section entitled Cautionary
Note Concerning Forward-Looking Information beginning on
page 63 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
In considering the recommendation of the Medco board with
respect to the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, you
should be aware that certain of Medcos directors and
executive officers may have interests in the merger that are
different from, or in addition to, yours. The Medco board was
aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in
evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, and in recommending that the merger
agreement be adopted by Medcos stockholders. See the
section entitled The Mergers Interests of
Officers and Directors in the Mergers beginning on
page 131.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Medco board in reaching its conclusions and
recommendations is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes
the material factors considered by the Medco board. In view of
the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, and the complexity of these matters, the
Medco board did not find it practicable to, and did not attempt
to, quantify, rank or assign any relative or specific weights to
the various factors considered in reaching its determination and
making its recommendation. In addition, individual directors may
have given different weights to different factors. The Medco
board considered all of the foregoing factors as a whole and
based its recommendation on the totality of the information
presented.
89
Opinions
of Financial Advisors to Medco
Opinion
of J.P. Morgan
Medco retained J.P. Morgan as its co-financial advisor to
advise Medco in connection with the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement and to discuss whether the per share Medco
merger consideration to be paid to holders of Medcos
common stock in the Medco merger was fair, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of Medcos common stock. At
the meeting of Medcos board of directors on July 20,
2011, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion, subsequently
confirmed in writing on the same day, to Medcos board of
directors that, as of such date and based upon and subject to
the various factors, procedures, assumptions, qualifications and
limitations set forth in its written opinion, the Medco merger
consideration to be paid to the holders of Medcos common
stock in the Medco merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to such stockholders.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan,
dated July 20, 2011, which sets forth, among other things,
the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered
and limitations on the review undertaken in rendering its
opinion, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex B. The summary of J.P. Morgans opinion set
forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
Medcos stockholders should read J.P. Morgans
opinion carefully and in its entirety. J.P. Morgan provided
its opinion for the information of Medcos board of
directors (in its capacity as such) in connection with and for
the purposes of its evaluation of the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement. J.P. Morgans written opinion
addresses only the fairness of the Medco merger consideration to
be paid to the holders of Medcos common stock in the Medco
merger, and does not address any other matter. The issuance of
the J.P. Morgan opinion was approved by a fairness opinion
committee of J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgans opinion
does not constitute a recommendation to any of Medcos
stockholders as to how such stockholder should vote with respect
to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or any
other matter. The Medco merger consideration to be paid to the
holders of Medcos common stock in the Medco merger was
determined in negotiations between Medco and Express Scripts,
and the decision to approve and recommend the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement was made independently by
Medcos board of directors. J.P. Morgans opinion
and financial analyses were among the many factors considered by
Medcos board of directors in its evaluation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and should not
be viewed as determinative of the views of Medcos board of
directors or management with respect to the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement or the Medco merger
consideration.
In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated July 19, 2011 of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning Medco and Express Scripts and the
industries in which they operate;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement with the publicly available
financial terms of certain transactions involving companies
J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and the consideration paid for
such companies;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of Medco and
Express Scripts with publicly available information concerning
certain other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and
reviewed the current and historical market prices of
Medcos common stock and of Express Scripts common
stock and certain publicly traded securities of such other
companies;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by or at the direction of the managements of Medco and
Express Scripts relating to their respective businesses (with
internal financial analyses and forecasts with respect to
Express Scripts from 2015 through 2021 being provided by
Medcos management based on guidance provided by Express
Scripts management), as well as the estimated amount and
timing of the cost savings and related expenses and synergies
expected to result
|
90
from the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
which we refer to in this section as the synergies (for more
information see the section entitled The
Mergers Certain Financial Forecasts beginning
on page 124); and
|
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as J.P. Morgan deemed
appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.
|
In addition, J.P. Morgan also held discussions with certain
members of the management of Medco and Express Scripts with
respect to certain aspects of the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, and the past and current business
operations of Medco and Express Scripts, the financial condition
and future prospects and operations of Medco, Express Scripts
and New Express Scripts, the effects of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement on the financial condition
and future prospects of Medco, Express Scripts and New Express
Scripts, and certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed
necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.
In giving its opinion, J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed
the accuracy and completeness of all information that was
publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with
J.P. Morgan by Medco and Express Scripts or otherwise
reviewed by or for J.P. Morgan, and J.P. Morgan did
not independently verify (nor did J.P. Morgan assume
responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any
such information or its accuracy or completeness.
J.P. Morgan did not conduct and was not provided with any
valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor did
J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency, of Medco or Express
Scripts or New Express Scripts under any state or federal laws
relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In
relying on financial analyses and forecasts provided to
J.P. Morgan, or derived therefrom, including the synergies,
J.P. Morgan assumed that they had been reasonably prepared
based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of Medco, Express
Scripts and New Express Scripts to which such analyses or
forecasts relate. J.P. Morgan expressed no view as to such
analyses or forecasts (including the synergies) or the
assumptions on which they were based, and J.P. Morgan has
assumed, with Medco managements approval, that the
synergies will be achieved at the times and in amounts projected
in all respects material to J.P. Morgans analysis.
J.P. Morgan also assumed that the Medco merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will
qualify as a tax free reorganization for United States federal
income tax purposes, and will be consummated as described in the
merger agreement, and that the definitive merger agreement will
not differ in any material respects from the draft thereof
furnished to J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan also assumed
that the representations and warranties made by Medco and
Express Scripts (including Express Scripts subsidiaries
that are parties to the merger agreement) in the merger
agreement and related agreements are and will be true and
correct in all respects material to J.P. Morgans
analysis. J.P. Morgan also noted that it was not authorized
to and did not solicit any expressions of interest from any
other parties with respect to the sale of all or any part of
Medco or any other alternative transaction. J.P. Morgan is
not a legal, regulatory or tax expert and has relied on the
assessments made by Medco and its advisors with respect to such
issues. J.P. Morgan further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement will be obtained without any adverse
effect on Medco, Express Scripts or New Express Scripts or on
the contemplated benefits of the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement.
J.P. Morgans opinion is necessarily based on economic,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of such
opinion. Subsequent developments may affect
J.P. Morgans opinion and J.P. Morgan does not
have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion
(including with respect to Express Scripts revised 2011
guidance, as such term is defined below).
J.P. Morgans opinion is limited to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, of the Medco merger consideration to
be paid to the holders of Medcos common stock in the Medco
merger, and J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the
fairness of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement to, or any consideration paid in connection therewith
to, the holders of any other class of securities, creditors or
other constituencies of Medco or as to the underlying decision
by Medco to engage in the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement. Furthermore, J.P. Morgan expressed no
opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation
to any officers, directors, or employees of any party to the
transactions contemplated by
91
the merger agreement, or any class of such persons relative to
the Medco merger consideration to be paid to the holders of
Medcos common stock in the Medco merger or with respect to
the fairness of any such compensation. J.P. Morgan has
expressed no opinion as to the price at which Medcos
common stock, Express Scripts common stock or New Express
Scripts common stock will trade at any future time.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methods
in reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the
material financial analyses undertaken by J.P. Morgan in
connection with rendering its opinion and delivered to
Medcos board of directors at its meeting on July 20,
2011. The financial analyses summarized below include
information presented in tabular format. In order to fully
understand J.P. Morgans financial analyses, the
tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The
tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses. Considering the data described below without
considering the full narrative description of the financial
analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying
the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of
J.P. Morgans financial analyses.
Public
Trading Analysis
Using publicly available information, including published equity
research analysts estimates (and for Medco also certain
internal management estimates), of cash earnings per share, or
Cash EPS, defined as earnings excluding tax-affected intangible
amortization expense and non-recurring charges per share, for
calendar year 2012 (which we refer to in this section as CY12)
and calendar year 2013 (which we refer to in this section as
CY13), J.P. Morgan compared selected financial and
operating data of Medco with publicly available information
(and, for Express Scripts also certain internal management
estimates, as directed by Medcos management), of selected
publicly traded companies chosen because they are companies that
for purposes of J.P. Morgans analyses may be
considered similar to Medco. The companies reviewed by
J.P. Morgan for the public trading analysis are set forth
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Medco*
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts*
|
|
|
|
CVS Caremark*
|
|
|
|
SXC Health Solutions
|
|
|
|
Catalyst Health Solutions
|
None of the other selected companies are identical or directly
comparable to Medco. However, these other companies were
selected, among other reasons, because they may be considered
similar, for purposes of these analyses, to Medco based on their
significant exposure to the pharmacy benefits management
industry in the United States. J.P. Morgan identified the
companies indicated with an * as primary selected
companies for the purposes of the analyses.
For each of the selected companies, J.P. Morgan calculated
the multiple of the stock price of its common equity divided by
the Cash EPS, which is referred to as the Cash Price/Earnings,
or Cash P/E, multiple. J.P. Morgan also analyzed the same
trading multiples for each of Medco and Express Scripts.
The low and high Cash P/E multiples of the analyzed companies
for CY12 estimated Cash EPS ranged from 11.4x to 29.3x (with
multiples of primary selected companies ranging from 11.4x to
13.2x) and CY13 estimated Cash EPS ranged from 9.9x to 25.8x
(with multiples of primary selected companies ranging from 9.9x
to 11.2x). Based on the results of this analysis
J.P. Morgan selected a Cash P/E multiple reference range of
(a) 11.5x to 14.0x for calendar year 2012, and
(b) 10.0x to 12.0x for calendar year 2013 and applied such
multiple reference ranges to Cash EPS estimates for 2012 and
2013, for Medco (which exclude the United
92
Healthcare contract) as provided by Medcos management, and
obtained the following ranges of implied equity values for Medco:
Public
Trading Analysis Implied Equity Values for Medco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
CY12E Cash P/E
|
|
$
|
50.25
|
|
|
$
|
61.25
|
|
CY13E Cash P/E
|
|
$
|
51.25
|
|
|
$
|
61.50
|
|
The ranges of implied equity values for Medco were compared to
an implied transaction value of $72.00 based on an average
closing price for Express Scripts common stock of $53.34
for the 10 trading days period ending July 18, 2011, which
is referred to as the
Ten-Day
Average Implied Transaction Value, and an implied transaction
value of $70.69 based on Express Scripts common stock spot
closing price of $51.72 as of July 18, 2011, which is
referred to as the Spot Price Implied Transaction Value.
Precedent
Transaction Analysis
Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan examined
the following selected transactions involving businesses chosen
because they are companies that, for purposes of
J.P. Morgans analyses, may be considered similar to
Medcos business. For each of the selected transactions,
J.P. Morgan calculated the firm value (determined as market
value, plus total debt, preferred stock, and minority interest,
less cash and cash equivalents, which we refer to in this
section as FV) as a multiple of the target companys
forward 12 months estimated earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, or Forward EBITDA, which
is referred to as FV/Forward EBITDA multiple. J.P. Morgan
identified those transactions indicated with a * as
primary precedent transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Transactions
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Transaction Multiple
|
|
Catalyst/WHI
|
|
March 9, 2011
|
|
13.1x
|
Express Scripts/WellPoint NextRx*
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
10.4x
|
Express Scripts/Caremark*
|
|
December 18, 2006
|
|
11.5x
|
CVS/Caremark*
|
|
November 1, 2006
|
|
11.2x
|
Caremark/AdvancePCS*
|
|
September 2, 2003
|
|
12.1x
|
Express Scripts/NPA
|
|
April 12, 2002
|
|
9.9x
|
J.P. Morgans analysis resulted in FV/Forward EBITDA
multiples for such transactions ranging from a low of 9.9x to a
high of 13.1x, with a median of 11.3x (with the primary
precedent transactions ranging from 10.4x to 12.1x). Based on
the results of this analysis, J.P. Morgan selected a
FV/Forward EBITDA multiple reference range of 10.0x to 12.0x,
and applied such multiple reference range to Medcos
one-year Forward EBITDA (which excludes the United Healthcare
contract) as provided to J.P. Morgan by Medcos
management. This analysis resulted in the following range of
implied equity value for Medcos common stock, as compared
to the
Ten-Day
Implied Transaction Value of $72.00 and Spot Price Implied
Transaction Value of $70.69.
Precedent
Transactions Implied Equity Value Range for Medco
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
J.P. Morgan performed a discounted cash flow analysis for the
purpose of determining the fully diluted implied equity value
per share of Medcos common stock. A discounted cash flow
analysis is a method of evaluating an asset using estimates of
the future unlevered after-tax free cash flows generated by this
asset and taking into consideration the time value of money with
respect to those future cash flows by calculating their
93
present value. The unlevered after-tax free
cash flows refers to a calculation of the future cash
flows of an asset without including in such calculation any debt
servicing costs. Present value refers to the current
value of one or more future cash payments from the asset, which
is referred to as that assets cash flows, and is obtained
by discounting those cash flows back to the present.
Terminal value refers to the capitalized value of
all cash flows from an asset for periods beyond the final
forecast period. In performing this analysis, J.P. Morgan
used the unlevered after-tax free cash flows that Medco is
projected to generate during fiscal years 2011 through 2021
provided by Medcos management. Such unlevered after-tax
free cash flows treated stock-based compensation as a cash
expense.
J.P. Morgan calculated the present value of the unlevered
after-tax free cash flows that Medco is expected to generate
during fiscal years 2011 through 2021. J.P. Morgan also
calculated a range of terminal values for Medco at the end of
the ten-year period ending 2021 by applying a perpetual growth
rate ranging from 0.5% to 1.5% to the unlevered after-tax free
cash flows of Medco during the final year of the ten-year
period. The unlevered after-tax free cash flows and the range of
terminal values were discounted to present value using a range
of discount rates from 7.5% to 9.0%, which were chosen by
J.P. Morgan based on an analysis of the estimated weighted
average cost of capital of Medco, which included, among other
things, an analysis of the companies listed under the
Public Trading Analysis described above.
The discounted cash flow analysis resulted in the following
range of implied equity values per share as compared to
Ten-Day
Implied Transaction Value of $72.00 and Spot Price Implied
Transaction Value of $70.69.
DCF
Implied Equity Value Range for Medco
Historical
Trading Range
For reference purposes only and not as a component of its
fairness analysis, J.P. Morgan presented to Medcos
board of directors the 52-week trading range of Medcos
common stock, which was $43.48 to $65.30 and compared that to
the Ten-Day
Implied Transaction Value of $72.00 and Spot Price Implied
Transaction Value of $70.69.
Analyst
Price Targets
J.P. Morgan also reviewed certain price targets of 21 public
analysts for Medco and noted for reference purposes only and not
as a component of its fairness analysis that the range of such
price targets was $53.00 to $77.00 with a median of $68.00, as
compared to the
Ten-Day
Implied Transaction Value of $72.00 and Spot Price Implied
Transaction Value of $70.69.
Relative
Implied Value Analyses
In order to assist in evaluating the exchange ratio to be used
for the stock component of the Medco merger consideration,
J.P. Morgan analyzed Medcos implied equity value net
of the $28.80 in cash to be paid as the cash component of the
Medco merger consideration, and performed a series of relative
implied exchange ratio analyses for each of the:
(a) 52-Week volume weighted average price, or VWAP, Range
Analysis, (b) Public Trading Analysis for Cash P/E 2012,
(c) Public Trading Analysis for Cash P/E 2013 and
(d) Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. In order to perform such
analyses, as directed by Medcos management,
J.P. Morgan reviewed the comparable information for Express
Scripts, on a standalone basis for each of the analyses listed
in clauses (a) through (d), using the same methods as
described above for Medco, and utilized the same 11.5x to 14.0x
Cash P/E multiple reference range for 2012, 10.0x to 12.0x Cash
P/E multiple reference range for 2013, and the same 7.5% to 9.0%
range of discount rates (which were chosen by J.P. Morgan
based on an analysis of the estimated weighted average cost of
capital of Express Scripts, which included, among other things,
an analysis of the companies listed under the Public
Trading Analysis
94
described above) and 0.5% to 1.5% range of terminal value growth
rates for the discounted cash flow analysis. In each case, as
directed by Medcos management, J.P. Morgan applied
such selected (i) Cash P/E reference ranges for 2012 and
2013 to estimates provided by Express Scripts management,
(ii) discount rates to estimates through 2014 provided by
Express Scripts management and estimates from 2015 through
2021 provided by Medcos management based on guidance from
Express Scripts management and (iii) terminal value
growth rates to that estimate for 2021, and, in each case,
obtained ranges of implied equity values for each of those
analyses for Express Scripts, which J.P. Morgan then
compared on a
low-to-low
and a
high-to-high
basis to the corresponding ranges of implied equity values for
Medco. Such comparisons resulted in ranges of implied exchange
ratios of Medcos common stock, net of the cash component
of the Medco merger consideration, to Express Scripts
common stock that are set forth below, in each case, as compared
to the 0.810x exchange ratio constituting the stock component of
the Medco merger consideration:
Relative
Implied Exchange Ratios Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Adjusted Implied Exchange Ratios
|
|
Analysis
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
52-Week VWAP Range
|
|
|
0.35x
|
|
|
|
0.64x
|
|
Public Trading Cash P/E 2012
|
|
|
0.47x
|
|
|
|
0.58x
|
|
Public Trading Cash P/E 2013
|
|
|
0.48x
|
|
|
|
0.58x
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow
|
|
|
0.57x
|
|
|
|
0.72x
|
|
J.P. Morgan noted that the 52-Week VWAP Range Analysis is not a
valuation methodology and that such analysis was presented
merely for reference purposes.
In addition, J.P. Morgan also compared Medcos common
stock price, net of the cash component of the Medco merger
consideration to be paid in the Medco merger, to Express
Scripts common stock price over certain historical trading
periods. The analysis for the periods set forth below resulted
in the following implied exchange ratios, as compared to the
implied exchange ratio of 0.810x provided for in the merger
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Adjusted Implied
|
|
Time Period
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
1-day
closing price
|
|
|
0.484x
|
|
1-day VWAP
|
|
|
0.483x
|
|
1-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.486x
|
|
2-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.493x
|
|
3-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.496x
|
|
4-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.491x
|
|
12-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.529x
|
|
26-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.532x
|
|
52-week VWAP
|
|
|
0.513x
|
|
2-year VWAP
|
|
|
0.590x
|
|
J.P. Morgan noted that a historical exchange ratio analysis is
not a valuation methodology and that such analysis was presented
merely for reference purposes.
Illustrative
Potential Hypothetical Value Creation Analysis
J.P. Morgan prepared an illustrative potential hypothetical
value creation analysis that compared the equity value implied
for each share of Medcos common stock based on the
discounted cash flow analysis to the potential pro forma implied
equity value of the combined company taking into account the
expected synergies. The pro forma combined company implied
equity value per share was equal to: (1) the sum of
(a) the mid-point of the discounted cash flow implied
equity value of Medco, (b) the mid-point of the discounted
cash flow implied equity value of Express Scripts,
(c) $6.7 billion, the implied present value of the
95
synergies (net of the cost to achieve such synergies) as
projected by the management of Medco, discounted using an 8.25%
discount rate (the midpoint of the range of discount rates used
in the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis as described above) and a
0.0% perpetuity growth rate (which was intended to reflect the
constant nature of the annual synergy projection provided to
J.P. Morgan by the management of Medco), and net of an estimated
$246 million of transaction-related expenses assumed to be
incurred contemporaneously with the closing, as projected by the
management of Medco, less (d) the aggregate cash component
of the Medco merger consideration to be paid to holders of
Medcos common stock in the Medco merger; divided by
(2) the pro forma diluted number of shares of the combined
company common stock. J.P. Morgan noted that there can be
no assurance that the synergies, estimated cost to achieve such
synergies or estimated transaction-related expenses will not be
substantially greater or less than the estimates by Medcos
management described above. The illustrative potential
hypothetical value creation analysis at the exchange ratio of
0.810 provided for in the merger agreement yielded illustrative
potential hypothetical value creation to the holders of Medco
common stock of approximately 17.5% based on the aggregate
approximate 40% pro forma ownership of the Medco stockholders in
the combined company.
J.P. Morgan noted that an illustrative potential hypothetical
value creation analysis is not a valuation methodology and such
analysis was presented merely for informational purposes.
The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses
does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or
data presented by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily
susceptible to partial analysis or summary description.
J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing summary and its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses or focusing
on information in tabular format, without considering all of its
analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the
processes underlying the analyses and its opinion. As a result,
ranges of valuation resulting from any particular analysis or
combination of analyses described above were merely utilized to
create points of reference for analytical purposes and should
not be taken to be the view of J.P. Morgan with respect to
the actual value of Medco or Express Scripts. In arriving at its
fairness determination, J.P. Morgan did not attribute any
particular weight to any analyses or factors considered by it
and did not form an opinion as to whether any individual
analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered in
isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion. Rather,
J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors and
analyses performed in determining its opinion. Analyses based
upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain, as
they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the
control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly,
forecasts and analyses used or made by J.P. Morgan are not
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those
analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgans analyses are not and
do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the
prices at which businesses actually could be bought or sold.
None of the selected companies reviewed as described in the
above summary is identical to Medco or Express Scripts, and none
of the other selected transactions reviewed was identical to the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. However, the
companies selected were chosen because they are publicly traded
companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of
J.P. Morgans analysis, may be considered similar to
those of Medco and Express Scripts. The transactions selected
were similarly chosen because their participants, size and other
factors, for purposes of J.P. Morgans analysis, may
be considered similar to the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement. The analyses necessarily involve complex
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial
and operational characteristics of the companies involved and
other factors that could affect the companies compared to Medco
and the transactions compared to the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement.
As a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan
and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was
selected on the basis of such experience and its familiarity
with Medco to advise Medco in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and to deliver a fairness
opinion to Medcos board of directors addressing only the
fairness of the Medco merger consideration to the holders of
Medcos common stock in the Medco merger as of the date of
such opinion.
96
For services rendered in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement (including the delivery of
its opinion), Medco has agreed to pay J.P. Morgan a fee for
its services based on a percentage formula of the total
transaction value which will be determined upon consummation,
but which is expected to be approximately $35 million based
on the closing price of Express Scripts stock as of
November 10, 2011, $5 million of which was payable
upon the execution of an initial definitive transaction
agreement and the balance of which is contingent upon the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. In addition, Medco has agreed to reimburse
J.P. Morgan for its reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with its services, including the reasonable fees and
disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify J.P. Morgan
against certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under
the federal securities laws.
During the two years preceding the date of this letter,
J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have had commercial or
investment banking relationships with Medco and Express Scripts,
for which J.P. Morgan and such affiliates have received
customary compensation. Such material services for which
J.P. Morgan has received compensation have primarily
included providing treasury and securities services to Medco,
acting as a joint bookrunner on Express Scripts
$1,400,000,000 common stock offering in June 2009, acting as a
joint bookrunner on Express Scripts $2,500,000,000 bond
offering in June 2009, acting as Express Scripts financial
advisor in connection with its acquisition of WellPoint
Inc.s NextRx subsidiaries NextRx, LLC, NextRx, Inc. and
NextRx Services, Inc., in June 2009 and acting as a joint
bookrunner on Express Scripts $1,500,000,000 bond offering
in April 2011. The aggregate compensation received by
J.P. Morgan and its affiliates from Express Scripts during
the last two years for such commercial or investment banking
relationships with Express Scripts was approximately
$43 million. In the ordinary course of its business,
J.P. Morgan and its affiliates may actively trade the debt
and equity securities of Medco, Express Scripts or New Express
Scripts for the account of J.P. Morgan or for the accounts
of customers and, accordingly, J.P. Morgan may at any time
hold long or short positions in such securities.
Opinion
of Lazard
On July 20, 2011, Lazard rendered its oral opinion to the
Medco board of directors, subsequently confirmed in writing,
that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the
assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations
set forth therein, the per share merger consideration to be paid
to holders of Medco common stock (other than shares of Medco
common stock held in treasury by Medco or owned by Medco, Medco
Merger Sub or any other wholly owned subsidiary of Medco, or
holders who are entitled to and properly demand an appraisal of
their shares of Medco common stock) in the mergers was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders.
The full text of Lazards written opinion, dated
July 20, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and
limitations on the review undertaken by Lazard in connection
with its opinion is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex C and is incorporated into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. The
description of Lazards opinion set forth in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of Lazards written opinion
attached as Annex C. We encourage you to read Lazards
opinion and this section carefully and in their entirety.
Lazards opinion was directed to the Medco board of
directors for the information and assistance of Medcos
board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and only
addressed the fairness, from a financial point of view, to
holders of Medco common stock (other than shares of Medco common
stock held in treasury by Medco or owned by Medco, Medco Merger
Sub or any other wholly owned subsidiary of Medco, or holders
who are entitled to and properly demand an appraisal of their
shares of Medco common stock) of the per share merger
consideration to be paid to such holders in the mergers as of
the date of Lazards opinion. Medco did not request Lazard
to consider, and Lazards opinion did not address, the
relative merits of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement as compared to any other transaction or business
strategy in which Medco might engage or the merits of the
underlying decision by Medco to engage in the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. In connection with
Lazards engagement, it was not authorized to, and it did
not, solicit indications of interest from third parties
regarding a potential
97
transaction with Medco. Lazards opinion was not
intended to and does not constitute a recommendation to any
holder of Medco common stock as to how such holder should vote
or act with respect to the mergers or any matter relating
thereto. Lazards opinion was necessarily based on
economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on,
and the information made available to Lazard as of, the date of
Lazards opinion. Lazard assumed no responsibility for
updating or revising its opinion based on circumstances or
events occurring after the date of Lazards opinion
(including with respect to Express Scripts revised 2011
guidance, as such term is defined below). Lazards opinion
did not express any opinion as to the prices at which shares of
Medco common stock or Express Scripts common stock may trade at
any time subsequent to the announcement of the mergers.
The following is a summary of Lazards opinion. We
encourage you to read Lazards written opinion carefully in
its entirety.
In connection with its opinion, Lazard:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the financial terms and conditions of a draft, dated
July 19, 2011, of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed certain publicly available historical business and
financial information relating to Medco and Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed various financial forecasts and other data provided to
Lazard by Medco relating to the business of Medco, various
financial forecasts and other data provided to Lazard by Express
Scripts and Medco relating to the business of Express Scripts
and certain publicly available financial forecasts and other
data relating to the business of Express Scripts and Medco (for
more information see the section entitled The
Mergers Certain Financial Forecasts beginning
on page 124;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held discussions with members of the senior managements of Medco
and Express Scripts with respect to the businesses and prospects
of Medco and Express Scripts, respectively and reviewed the
projected synergies and other benefits, including the amount and
timing thereof, anticipated by the management of Medco and
Express Scripts to be realized from the mergers;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed public information with respect to certain other
companies in lines of business Lazard believes to be generally
relevant in evaluating the businesses of Medco and Express
Scripts, respectively;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the financial terms of certain business combinations
involving companies in lines of business Lazard believes to be
generally relevant in evaluating the business of Medco;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed historical stock prices and trading volumes of Medco
common stock and Express Scripts common stock;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed the potential pro forma financial impact of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement on Express
Scripts based on the financial forecasts referred to above
relating to Medco and Express Scripts; and
|
|
|
|
Conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as Lazard deemed appropriate.
|
Lazard assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of
the foregoing information, without independent verification of
such information. Lazard has not conducted any independent
valuation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Medco or Express Scripts or
concerning the solvency or fair value of Medco or Express
Scripts, and Lazard has not been furnished with any such
valuation or appraisal. At the Medco boards direction, for
purposes of its analyses, Lazard utilized financial forecasts
with respect to Express Scripts for the period from 2011 through
2014 that were provided by management of Express Scripts and for
the period after 2014 that were provided by Medco based upon
discussions with management of Express Scripts. With respect to
all of the financial forecasts utilized in its analyses,
including those related to projected synergies anticipated by
the managements of Medco and Express Scripts to be realized from
the mergers, Lazard assumed, with the consent of Medco, that
they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments as to the future
financial performance of Medco and Express Scripts,
respectively, and such synergies. With respect to the synergies
and
98
financial benefits anticipated by the managements of Medco and
Express Scripts to be realized from the mergers, Lazard assumed,
with the consent of Medco, that the estimates of the amounts and
timing of such synergies and financial benefits are reasonable
and that such financial benefits will be realized substantially
in accordance with such estimates in all material respects
relevant to Lazards analysis. Lazard assumed no
responsibility for and expressed no view as to any such
forecasts or the assumptions on which they are based.
In rendering its opinion, Lazard assumed, with the consent of
Medco, that the mergers will be consummated on the terms
described in the July 19, 2011 draft of the merger
agreement, without any waiver or modification of any material
terms or conditions. Representatives of Medco advised Lazard,
and Lazard assumed, that the merger agreement, when executed,
would conform to the draft reviewed by Lazard in all material
respects. Lazard also assumed, with the consent of Medco, that
obtaining the necessary governmental, regulatory or third-party
approvals and consents for the mergers will not have an adverse
effect on Medco, Express Scripts or the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. Lazard further assumed,
with the consent of Medco, that the mergers will qualify for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as an exchange within the
meaning of Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. Lazard did not express any opinion as to any
tax or other consequences that might result from the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, nor did its
opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting
matters, as to which Lazard understood that Medco obtained such
advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals.
Lazard expressed no view or opinion as to any terms or other
aspects (other than the Medco merger consideration to the extent
expressly specified herein) of the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, including, without limitation, the form or
structure of the mergers, or any agreements or arrangements
entered into in connection with, or contemplated by, the merger
agreement. In addition, Lazard expressed no view or opinion as
to the fairness of the amount or nature of, or any other aspects
relating to, the compensation to any officers, directors or
employees of any parties to the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, or class of such persons, relative to the
Medco merger consideration or otherwise.
The following is a brief summary of the material financial
analyses and reviews that Lazard deemed appropriate in
connection with rendering its opinion. The brief summary of
Lazards analyses and reviews provided below is not a
complete description of the analyses and reviews underlying
Lazards opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is
a complex process involving various determinations as to the
most appropriate and relevant methods of analysis and review and
the application of those methods to particular circumstances,
and, therefore, is not readily susceptible to summary
description. Considering selected portions of the analyses and
reviews or the summary set forth below, without considering the
analyses and reviews as a whole, could create an incomplete or
misleading view of the analyses and reviews underlying
Lazards opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Lazard considered the results of all
of its analyses and reviews and did not attribute any particular
weight to any factor, analysis or review considered by it;
rather, Lazard made its determination as to fairness on the
basis of its experience and professional judgment after
considering the results of all of its analyses and reviews.
For purposes of its analyses and reviews, Lazard considered
industry performance, general business, economic, market and
financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond
the control of Medco and Express Scripts. No company, business
or transaction used in Lazards analyses and reviews as a
comparison is identical to Medco, Express Scripts, or the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and an
evaluation of the results of those analyses and reviews is not
entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses and reviews involve
complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and
operating characteristics and other factors that could affect
the acquisition, public trading or other values of the
companies, businesses or transactions used in Lazards
analyses and reviews. The estimates contained in Lazards
analyses and reviews and the ranges of valuations resulting from
any particular analysis or review are not necessarily indicative
of actual values or predictive of future results or values,
which may be significantly more or less favorable than those
suggested by Lazards analyses and reviews. In addition,
analyses and reviews relating to the value of companies,
businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to
reflect the prices at which companies, businesses or securities
actually may be sold. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and
the results derived from, Lazards analyses and reviews are
inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
99
The summary of the analyses and reviews provided below
includes information presented in tabular format. In order to
fully understand Lazards analyses and reviews, the tables
must be read together with the full text of each summary. The
tables alone do not constitute a complete description of
Lazards analyses and reviews. Considering the data in the
tables below without considering the full description of the
analyses and reviews, including the methodologies and
assumptions underlying the analyses and reviews, could create a
misleading or incomplete view of Lazards analyses and
reviews.
Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative
information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is
based on market data as it existed on or before July 20,
2011 and is not necessarily indicative of current market
conditions.
Lazard calculated an implied per share merger consideration of
$72.00 based on (i) the fixed exchange ratio of 0.810x and
the average daily closing prices of Express Scripts common stock
for the
10-day
period ending July 18, 2011 and (ii) the $28.80 per
share in cash.
Medco
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Based on the projections provided by Medco management (as
discussed above), Lazard performed a discounted cash flow
analysis of Medco to calculate the estimated present value of
the unlevered free cash flows (i.e., Adjusted EBIT (earnings
before interest and taxes) less taxes, capital expenditures, and
change in working capital plus depreciation and amortization)
that Medco could generate during the fiscal years 2011 through
2021. Lazard also calculated estimated terminal values for Medco
by applying a perpetual growth rate range of 0.5% to 1.50%. The
unlevered free cash flows and terminal values were discounted to
present value using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 9.0%.
The discount rates applicable to Medco were based, among other
things, on Lazards judgment of the estimated range of
weighted average cost of capital based on an analysis of
selected comparable companies, which are included under the
caption Medco Selected Comparable Companies Analysis
below. Lazards discounted cash flow analysis treated
stock-based compensation as a cash expense. Lazard primarily
focused on the larger pharmacy benefit managers, given their
greater operational comparability to Medco, relative to smaller
pharmacy benefit managers, HMOs and other healthcare service
companies also considered in this analysis. This analysis
resulted in an implied per share equity reference range for
Medco on a standalone basis of $62.00 to $80.00, as compared to
the per share merger consideration of $72.00.
Medco
Selected Comparable Companies Analysis
Lazard reviewed and analyzed selected public companies that it
viewed as reasonably comparable to Medco. In performing these
analyses, Lazard reviewed and analyzed certain publicly
available financial information, implied multiples and market
trading data relating to the selected comparable companies and
compared such information to the corresponding information for
Medco. Specifically, Lazard compared Medco to the following
public companies:
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts*
|
|
|
|
CVS Caremark Corp.
|
|
|
|
Catalyst Health
|
|
|
|
SXC Health Solutions Corp.
|
|
|
|
McKesson Corp.
|
|
|
|
Cardinal Health, Inc.
|
|
|
|
AmeriSourceBergen Corp.
|
|
|
|
Omnicare, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Health Management Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc.
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
WellPoint, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Aetna Inc.
|
|
|
|
CIGNA Corp.
|
|
|
|
Humana Inc.
|
|
|
|
Coventry Health Care, Inc.
|
Although none of the selected companies is directly comparable
to Medco, the companies included are publicly traded companies
with operations
and/or other
criteria, such as lines of business, markets, business risks and
size and scale of business, which for purposes of analysis
Lazard considered similar to Medco. While the HMOs and other
healthcare services companies were included due to their similar
market dynamics to Medco, the larger pharmacy benefit manager
comparables are more operationally comparable to Medco. Based on
the foregoing analysis, Lazard, in its professional judgment,
considered the comparable denoted by an asterisk above to be the
core comparable. Lazard reviewed, among other things, the price
to earnings per share (which we refer to in this section as EPS)
multiple (which we refer to in this section as the P/E multiple)
for 2012 and 2013.
Based on the results of the foregoing analysis with respect to
the core comparables and Lazards professional judgment,
Lazard applied P/E multiples of 12.0x to 13.5x to the 2012 EPS
provided by Medco management (as discussed above) and multiples
of 10.0x to 11.5x to the 2013 EPS provided by Medco management
(as discussed above). The results of the foregoing analysis
implied an equity value per share range for Medco of $51.00 to
$59.00, as compared to the per share merger consideration of
$72.00.
Medco
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis
Lazard reviewed and analyzed certain publicly available
financial information of target companies in selected precedent
merger and acquisition transactions involving companies it
viewed as relevant. In performing these analyses, Lazard
analyzed certain financial information and transaction multiples
relating to the target companies involved in the selected
transactions and compared such information to the corresponding
information for Medco.
Lazard noted that, due to the size of the proposed transaction
with Express Scripts and the lines of business of Medco, there
are few relevant precedent transactions to analyze. Although
none of the selected precedent transactions or the companies
party to such transactions is directly comparable to the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or to Medco,
all of the transactions were chosen because they involve
transactions that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered
similar to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
and/or
involve targets that, for purposes of analysis, may be
considered similar to Medco. The transactions reviewed were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Enterprise Value/NTM EBITDA
|
|
|
April 13, 2009
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
NextRx*
|
|
|
10.4x
|
|
March 11, 2007
|
|
UnitedHealth
|
|
Sierra Health Services
|
|
|
12.5x
|
|
March 7, 2007
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Caremark *
|
|
|
11.4x
|
|
March 8, 2007
|
|
CVS
|
|
Caremark *
|
|
|
11.2x
|
|
September 27, 2005
|
|
WellPoint
|
|
WellChoice
|
|
|
12.7x
|
|
July 6, 2005
|
|
UnitedHealth
|
|
Pacificare
|
|
|
11.6x
|
|
For each of the transactions, Lazard calculated, to the extent
information was publicly available, enterprise value as a
multiple of EBITDA for the next twelve months based on the
transactions announcement date. Lazard also noted that the
precedent transactions denoted by an asterisk above were
considered to be core precedents and had a median
multiple of 11.2x. The results of the core
precedents analyses were a range of multiples from 10.4x
to 11.4x.
Based on Lazards analysis of the core
precedents, as noted above, and Lazards professional
judgment, Lazard applied multiples of 10.5x to 11.5x to the next
twelve months EBITDA provided by Medco
101
management (as discussed above) to calculate an implied equity
value per share range for Medco of $63.00 to $70.00, as compared
to the per share merger consideration of $72.00. Additionally,
based on the foregoing analyses with respect to the selected
precedent transactions group and Lazards professional
judgment (including, without limitation, the size of the range
obtained), Lazard applied multiples of 10.0x to 13.0x to the
next twelve months EBITDA provided by the Medco management (as
discussed above) to calculate an implied equity value per share
range for Medco of $59.00 to $81.00, as compared to the per
share merger consideration of $72.00.
Other
Analyses
The analyses and data relating to Medco described below were
presented to the Medco board of directors for informational
purposes.
Medco
Historical Trading Analysis
Lazard reviewed historical data with regard to the closing
prices of Medco common stock for the 52-week period to and
including July 18, 2011. During this period, the closing
price of shares of Medco common stock ranged from a low of
$43.48 to a high of $65.30 per share, as compared to the per
share merger consideration of $72.00.
Analyst
Price Targets Analysis
Lazard reviewed 15 Wall Street research equity analyst per share
target prices for Medco common stock as of July 18, 2011,
which target prices were released by analysts between
May 27, 2011 and July 8, 2011. The range of these
target prices was $53.00 to $77.00, as compared to the per share
merger consideration of $72.00.
Present
Value of Hypothetical Future Stock Prices Analysis
Lazard performed an illustrative analysis of the implied present
values of the future stock price of Medco, which is designed to
provide an indication of the present value of a theoretical
future value of a companys equity as a function of such
companys estimated future EPS. For this analysis, Lazard
calculated a range of implied share prices for the Medco common
stock by discounting to June 30, 2011 the estimated
theoretical future share prices of the Medco common stock for
the fiscal years 2013 and 2014. Lazard first calculated the
theoretical equity value of Medco for the fiscal years 2013 and
2014 by applying forward 2012 multiples of 12.3x to 13.1x (an
illustrative range based on the implied 2012 P/E multiples for
Medco and Express Scripts, as well as the blended multiple) to
the 2013 and 2014 EPS provided by Medco management (as discussed
above). Lazard then calculated the resulting range of implied
per share equity values for the fiscal years 2013 and 2014 and
discounted that range to June 30, 2011 using an equity
discount rate of 9.0%. The results of the foregoing analysis
implied an equity value per share range for Medco of $58.00 to
$69.50, as compared to the per share merger consideration of
$72.00.
Premiums
Paid Analysis
Lazard performed a premiums paid analysis based on premiums paid
in U.S. merger and acquisition transactions since
January 1, 2006 involving U.S. target companies with a
transaction value in excess of $10 billion. This criteria
yielded a data set of 29 transactions, of which seven
transactions involved healthcare targets.
The implied premiums in this analysis were calculated by
comparing the per share acquisition price to the target
companys (i) closing share price one trading day
prior to announcement, (ii) closing share price five
trading days prior to announcement and (iii) closing share
price for twenty trading days prior to announcement. The 75th
percentile of premiums for the transactions represented premiums
of 33.8%, 31.4% and 38.9%, respectively, to the one trading day,
five trading day and 20 trading day periods ending immediately
prior to the announcement date of the transaction and that the
25th percentile of all the transactions represented
102
premiums of 18.7%, 16.5% and 17.5%, respectively, to the one
trading day, five trading day and 20 trading day periods ending
immediately prior to the announcement date of the transaction.
Based on the foregoing analyses and Lazards professional
judgment (including, without limitation, the size of the range
obtained), Lazard applied such 25th percentile and
75th percentile to the Medco common stock closing prices
for the one trading day, five trading day and 20 trading day
periods ending July 18, 2011 to calculate an implied equity
value per share range for Medco of $64.00 to $73.50, as compared
to the per share merger consideration of $72.00.
In addition to performing valuation analysis of Medcos
equity value per share, Lazard performed valuation analysis of
Express Scripts equity value per share, to evaluate the
form of consideration to be received by Medco stockholders
pursuant to the mergers. The following paragraphs summarize this
Express Scripts valuation analysis.
Express
Scripts Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Based on the projections provided by Medco and Express Scripts
management (as discussed above), Lazard performed a discounted
cash flow analysis of Express Scripts to calculate the estimated
present value of the unlevered free cash flows (i.e., Adjusted
EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) less taxes, capital
expenditures, and change in working capital plus depreciation
and amortization) that Express Scripts could generate during the
fiscal years 2011 through 2021. Lazard also calculated estimated
terminal values for Express Scripts by applying a perpetual
growth rate range of 0.5% to 1.50%. The unlevered free cash
flows and terminal values were discounted to present value using
discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 9.0%. The discount rates
applicable to Express Scripts were based, among other things, on
Lazards judgment of the estimated range of weighted
average cost of capital based on an analysis of the selected
comparable companies discussed above in the Medco
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Lazard primarily focused on
the larger pharmacy benefit managers, given their greater
operational comparability to Express Scripts, relative to
smaller pharmacy benefit managers, HMOs and other
healthcare services companies also considered in this analysis.
This analysis resulted in an implied per share equity reference
range for Express Scripts on a standalone basis of $59.50 to
$74.50, as compared to the $51.72 price per Express Scripts
common share as of July 18, 2011.
Express
Scripts Selected Comparable Companies Analysis
Based on an analysis of the selected comparable companies
discussed above in the Medco Selected Comparable Companies
Analysis, including Medco as a core comparable company,
and Lazards professional judgment, Lazard applied P/E
multiples of 12.0x to 13.5x to the Express Scripts 2012 EPS that
was provided by Medco and Express Scripts management (as
discussed above) and P/E multiples of 10.0x to 11.5x to the 2013
EPS that was provided by Medco and Express Scripts management
(as discussed above). This analysis resulted in an implied per
share equity reference range for Express Scripts on a standalone
basis of $47.00 to $54.00, as compared to the $51.72 price per
Express Scripts common share as of July 18, 2011.
Analyst
Price Targets Analysis
Lazard reviewed 19 Wall Street research equity analyst per share
target prices for Express Scripts common stock as of
July 18, 2011, which target prices were released by
analysts between April 26, 2011 and June 30, 2011. The
range of these target prices was $53.00 to $72.00, as compared
to the $51.72 price per Express Scripts common share as of
July 18, 2011.
Present
Value of Hypothetical Future Stock Prices Analysis
Lazard performed an illustrative analysis of the implied present
values of the future stock price of Express Scripts, which is
designed to provide an indication of the present value of a
theoretical future value of a companys equity as a
function of such companys estimated future EPS. For this
analysis, Lazard calculated a range of implied share prices for
the Express Scripts common stock by discounting to June 30,
2011 the estimated theoretical future share prices of the
Express Scripts common stock for the fiscal years 2013 and 2014.
Lazard first calculated the theoretical equity value of Express
Scripts for the fiscal years 2013 and 2014
103
by applying forward 2012 P/E multiples of 12.3x to 13.1x (an
illustrative range based on the implied 2012 P/E multiples for
Medco and Express Scripts, as well as the blended multiple) to
the 2013 and 2014 EPS projections provided by Medco management
and Express Scripts management (as discussed above). Lazard then
calculated the resulting range of implied per share equity
values for the fiscal years 2013 and 2014 and discounted that
range to June 30, 2011 using an equity discount rate of
9.0%. This analysis resulted in an implied per share equity
reference range for Express Scripts on a standalone basis of
$53.50 to $61.00, as compared to the $51.72 price per Express
Scripts common share as of July 18, 2011.
Pro Forma
Merger Analysis
Lazard analyzed the potential pro forma financial effects of the
merger on Express Scripts estimated EPS for its fiscal
years 2012 through 2014 using various financial forecasts and
other data provided to Lazard by Medco and Express Scripts with
respect to their respective businesses, as well as publicly
available financial forecasts and other data relating to the
business of Medco. For purposes of this analysis, Lazard
assumed, among other things, pre-tax synergies to be realized
from the mergers of $500 million in 2012, $800 million in 2013,
and peak synergies of $1 billion in 2014, as provided by Medco
and Express Scripts management (as discussed above). Lazard
noted that the mergers are expected to be accretive to Express
Scripts estimated EPS for each of the fiscal years 2012
through 2014.
Illustrative
Potential Value Creation Analysis
For informational purposes, Lazard performed an illustrative
value creation analysis which compared the standalone equity
value per share of Medco to the potential pro forma equity value
per share (reflecting Medcos pro forma ownership), which
includes the effect of after-tax net synergies. Lazard performed
this analysis using two methodologies: DCF-based value creation
analysis and pro forma trading analysis. In the DCF-based value
creation analysis, Lazard compared the midpoint of the
standalone DCF equity value per share for Medco to the total
equity value per share implied by (i) $28.80 per share in
cash consideration plus (ii) the implied midpoint equity
value per share of the combined company. The implied equity
value per share of the combined company was derived based on
(a) the sum of the midpoint standalone equity values of
each of Medco and Express Scripts and the midpoint after-tax net
present value of synergies (discounted using discount rates
ranging from 8.0% to 9.0% and a perpetual growth rate range of
0.5% to 1.50%), minus the aggregate cash consideration paid out
to Medco stockholders and estimated transaction-related
expenses, divided by (b) the pro forma shares outstanding.
This analysis implied approximately 21% value creation to
Medcos stockholders.
In the pro forma illustrative trading analysis, Lazard compared
the current trading price of Medco to the total equity value per
share implied by (i) $28.80 per share in cash consideration
plus (ii) the implied equity value per share of the
combined company. The implied equity value per share of the
combined company was derived based on 2012 combined company EPS
multiplied by a range of pro forma 2012 P/E multiples that
included the current trading multiples of Medco and Express
Scripts, as well as a blended 2012 P/E multiple. This pro forma
trading analysis implied a range of value creation to Medco
stockholders of approximately 36% to 63%.
Lazard did not express any opinion as to the actual prices at
which shares of the common stock of the combined company may
trade.
Miscellaneous
Lazard prepared these analyses solely for purposes of, and the
analyses were delivered to the Medco board of directors in
connection with, the provision of its opinion to the Medco board
of directors as to the fairness from a financial point of view
of the per share merger consideration to be paid to the holders
of Medco common stock (except for certain holders identified in
Lazards opinion) pursuant to the merger agreement. These
analyses do not purport to be appraisals nor do they necessarily
reflect or purport to reflect the prices at which businesses or
securities actually may be sold or the prices at which any
securities have traded or may trade at anytime in the future.
Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are not
104
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these
analyses. Because these analyses are inherently subject to
uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond
the control of the parties or their respective advisors, neither
Lazard nor any other person assumes responsibility if future
results are materially different from those forecast.
Lazard, as part of its investment banking business, is
continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, leveraged buyouts, and
valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes. In the
ordinary course of their respective businesses, Lazard
Frères & Co. LLC and LFCM Holdings LLC (an entity
indirectly owned in large part by managing directors of Lazard
Frères & Co. LLC) and their respective
affiliates may actively trade securities of Medco, Express
Scripts and certain of their respective affiliates for their own
accounts and for the accounts of their customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities, and may also trade and hold securities on
behalf of Medco, Express Scripts and certain of their respective
affiliates. Lazard in the past has provided and in the future
may provide certain investment banking services to Medco and
certain of its affiliates, for which Lazard has received and may
receive compensation. During the past two years, Lazard has
provided advisory services to Medco in connection with its 2010
acquisition of United BioSource, for which it received an
aggregate fee of $2 million. Lazard has not been engaged by
Express Scripts in the past two years. The issuance of
Lazards opinion was approved by the Opinion Committee of
Lazard.
In connection with Lazards services as financial advisor
to the Medco board of directors and pursuant to the terms of the
Lazard engagement letter dated July 7, 2011, Medco agreed
to pay Lazard an aggregate fee based on a percentage formula of
the aggregate consideration to be paid in the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. The aggregate fee will be
determined upon consummation of the mergers. As of
November 14, 2011, such fee is estimated to be
approximately $35 million calculated based on the closing
price of Express Scripts common shares as of
November 10, 2011. $5 million of Lazards
aggregate fee was payable to Lazard upon execution of the merger
agreement and the remainder of Lazards aggregate fee is
payable upon consummation of the mergers. Medco also agreed to
pay Lazard 1% of any
break-up,
termination, topping or similar fee that Medco may receive in
connection with the mergers, provided that such amount shall not
exceed the amount of Lazards aggregate fee described
above. In addition, Medco also agreed to reimburse Lazard for
its reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the
engagement and to indemnify Lazard and certain related parties
against certain liabilities under certain circumstances that may
arise out of the rendering of its advice, including certain
liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws.
The type and amount of consideration payable pursuant to the
merger agreement was determined through arms-length
negotiations between Medco and Express Scripts, rather than by
any financial advisor, and was approved by the Medco board of
directors. Lazard did not recommend any specific merger
consideration to the Medco board of directors or to Medco or
that any given merger consideration constituted the only
appropriate consideration for the mergers. The decision to enter
into the merger agreement was solely that of the Medco board of
directors. As described above, the opinion of Lazard was one of
many factors taken into consideration by the Medco board of
directors in making the determination to approve the merger
agreement. Consequently, the analyses described above should not
be viewed as determinative of the opinion of the Medco board of
directors with respect to the Medco merger consideration.
Lazard is an internationally recognized investment banking firm
providing a full range of financial advisory and other services.
Medco selected Lazard as a financial advisor because of its
qualifications, expertise and reputation in investment banking
and mergers and acquisitions, as well as its familiarity with
the business of Medco.
Recommendation
of the Express Scripts Board; Express Scripts Reasons for
the Mergers
At a meeting held on July 20, 2011, the Express Scripts
board unanimously approved the merger agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in the merger agreement, determined that the terms of the
Express Scripts merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement are fair to, and in the best
105
interests of, Express Scripts and its stockholders, directed
that the merger agreement be submitted to Express Scripts
stockholders for adoption, recommended that Express Scripts
stockholders adopt the merger agreement and declared that the
merger agreement is advisable. ACCORDINGLY, THE EXPRESS
SCRIPTS BOARD, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT EXPRESS SCRIPTS
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE
MERGER AGREEMENT AND FOR THE PROPOSAL TO
APPROVE THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING (IF IT IS
NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL PROXIES IF THERE
ARE NOT SUFFICIENT VOTES TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT).
As described above under Background of the
Merger, the Express Scripts board, in evaluating the
mergers and the merger agreement, consulted with Express
Scripts management and legal and financial advisors and,
in reaching its decision at its meeting on July 20, 2011 to
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, considered a variety of factors weighing positively and
negatively in connection with the mergers. In light of the
number and wide variety of factors considered in connection with
its evaluation of the transaction, the Express Scripts board did
not consider it practicable to, and did not attempt to, quantify
or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors it
considered in reaching its determination. The Express Scripts
board viewed its position as being based on all of the
information available and the factors presented to and
considered by it. In addition, individual directors may have
given different weight to different factors. This explanation of
Express Scripts reasons for the mergers and all other
information presented in this section is forward-looking in
nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors
discussed under Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements.
The reasons in favor of the mergers considered by the Express
Scripts board include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the strategic and transformative nature of the transaction,
which will combine Express Scripts and Medcos
respective businesses to create a new company which will be one
of the leading enterprises for pharmacy benefit management, with
pro forma combined revenues of over $110 billion;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, because Express Scripts stockholders would hold
approximately 59% of the New Express Scripts common stock upon
completion of the mergers, Express Scripts stockholders would
have the opportunity to participate in the future performance of
the combined company;
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the combined company would be led by a strong, experienced
management team with a demonstrated record of integrating
acquisitions, including most recently the acquisition of
WellPoints PBM business;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the combined company would have a strong balance
sheet and the ability to generate substantial cash flow to
finance future expansion as well as to invest in improving and
adding new technology, services and products for
customers; and
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts view of the likelihood that the required
regulatory approvals would be obtained, notwithstanding the
length of time that obtaining such approvals may require,
without a material adverse impact on the respective businesses
of Express Scripts, Medco or New Express Scripts.
|
The Express Scripts board also considered the following
additional factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the review and analysis of Express Scripts and
Medcos businesses, historical financial performance and
condition, operations, properties, assets, regulatory issues,
competitive positions, prospects and management, including the
results of the business, financial, accounting and legal due
diligence investigations of Medco;
|
|
|
|
the current and prospective economic and competitive environment
facing the pharmacy benefit management industry and Express
Scripts;
|
|
|
|
the strong strategic fit between Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
the historical market prices, volatility and trading information
with respect to Medco common stock and Express Scripts common
stock;
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
the terms of the proposed financing for the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the combined company to service and pay down any
indebtedness incurred in connection with the mergers;
|
|
|
|
the views of Express Scripts management and financial
advisors as to the likelihood that Express Scripts will be able
to obtain the necessary financing and that the full proceeds of
the financing will be available to Express Scripts, in each case
subject to the terms of the debt commitment letter;
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including
(i) the nature and scope of the closing conditions, as well
as the likelihood of satisfaction of these conditions, and
(ii) the circumstances under which a termination fee is
payable by Medco and the size of the termination fees payable by
Medco;
|
|
|
|
that because the exchange ratio under the merger agreement is
fixed (i.e., it will not be adjusted for fluctuations in the
market price of Express Scripts common stock or Medco common
stock), Express Scripts has certainty as to the number of shares
of New Express Scripts common stock to be issued;
|
|
|
|
that because the exchange ratio under the merger agreement is
fixed, the value of the equity consideration payable to Express
Scripts stockholders in the mergers could change between the
signing of the merger agreement and the completion of the
mergers as a result of, among other things: (1) a change in
the value of the respective businesses of Express Scripts and
Medco, (2) the amount of cash generated by Express Scripts
and Medco prior to closing, (3) the amount of revenue
synergies and cost savings anticipated to be obtained as a
result of the mergers, (4) changes in the equity markets,
(5) changes in the financial markets, including changes in
borrowing costs and (6) changes in the regulatory
environment and the political outlook insofar they effect market
perspectives on regulatory initiatives;
|
|
|
|
the separate opinions and financial presentations of Credit
Suisse and Citigroup, each dated July 20, 2011, to the
Express Scripts board as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view and as of the date of the opinion, to Express Scripts of
the Medco merger consideration to be issued and paid by New
Express Scripts, as more fully described below (see The
Mergers Opinions of Financial Advisors to Express
Scripts);
|
|
|
|
that the mergers would provide for significant opportunities for
cost saving by eliminating duplicative activities, including
consolidating corporate governance, reducing public company
costs, reducing procurement expenses, reducing labor expenses
and realizing synergies between the businesses of Medco and
Express Scripts, while at the same time realizing significant
revenue growth opportunities, thereby driving meaningful and
long-term stockholder value; the Express Scripts board reviewed
potential net transaction synergies anticipated to result from
the combination of Medcos and Express Scripts
businesses, including potential synergies as initially estimated
by Express Scripts management of approximately
$1.1 billion, referred to as the initial estimated
synergies, as well as a revised and more conservative estimate
discussed by such management with the Express Scripts board at
its July 20, 2011 meeting of approximately
$1.0 billion, referred to as the revised estimated
synergies. The Express Scripts board considered the fact that
the discounted cash flow analyses of Medco, which was one of a
number of financial analyses performed and reviewed at the
July 20, 2011 board meeting by Credit Suisse and Citigroup
in connection with their respective opinions, incorporated the
initial estimated synergies of $1.1 billion that had been
provided by Express Scripts management to Express
Scripts financial advisors at the time of preparation of
such analyses. Following Express Scripts managements
discussion at the July 20, 2011 board meeting of the
revised estimated synergies of $1.0 billion, each of Credit
Suisse and Citigroup discussed with the Express Scripts board
its belief that had it used the revised estimated synergies as
part of its discounted cash flow analysis of Medco, such change
would not have, subject to the assumptions, matters considered
and limitations described therein, altered its opinion and,
thereafter, Credit Suisse memorialized its discussion by
providing the Express Scripts board with a discounted cash flow
analysis of Medco incorporating the revised estimated synergies
(for a discussion of the financial analyses and opinions of
Express Scripts financial advisors, see the section
entitled The Mergers Opinions of Financial
Advisors to Express Scripts);
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
the anticipation that the portion of the consideration to be
received by Express Scripts stockholders in the Express Scripts
merger in the form of shares of New Express Scripts common stock
will be tax-free to Express Scripts stockholders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes (see The
Mergers Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences ); and
|
|
|
|
the potential impact of pending legislation and potential
regulatory changes.
|
The Express Scripts board also considered the following
potentially negative factors associated with the mergers:
|
|
|
|
|
the dilution associated with the shares that New Express Scripts
could be required to issue under the mergers;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the mergers might not be consummated in a timely
manner or that the closing of the mergers might not occur
despite the companies efforts, including by reason of a
failure to obtain the approval of either of the Express Scripts
stockholder or the Medco stockholders, the failure by Express
Scripts to obtain financing or the failure of the parties to
obtain the applicable regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
|
the potential length of the regulatory approval process and the
period of time during which Express Scripts may be subject to
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that regulatory or governmental authorities
might seek to impose conditions or divestitures on or otherwise
prevent or delay the mergers, including the risk that they might
seek an injunction in Federal court
and/or
commence an administrative proceeding seeking to prevent the
parties from completing the transaction;
|
|
|
|
the risks and costs to Express Scripts if the mergers are not
completed, including the potential diversion of management and
employee attention, potential employee attrition and the
potential effect on business and customer relationships;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits of the mergers may not be
fully or partially realized, recognizing the many potential
management and regulatory challenges associated with
successfully combining the businesses of Express Scripts and
Medco, including the potential for client losses and the
possibility that anticipated cost savings from the mergers may
not be realized;
|
|
|
|
the risk of diverting management focus and resources from other
strategic opportunities and from operational matters, and
potential disruption associated with the mergers and integrating
the companies;
|
|
|
|
the risk that certain key employees of Express Scripts or Medco
might not choose to remain with the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the potential challenges and difficulties relating to
integrating the operations of Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of Express Scripts
business prior to the completion of the mergers, requiring
Express Scripts to conduct its business in the ordinary course,
subject to specific limitations, which may delay or prevent
Express Scripts from undertaking business opportunities that may
arise pending completion of the mergers;
|
|
|
|
the limitations imposed in the merger agreement on the
solicitation or consideration by Express Scripts of alternative
business combinations;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Express Scripts may be required to pay Medco,
under certain circumstances, a termination fee of up to
$950 million and expense reimbursement of up to
$225 million if the merger agreement were to be terminated
(see The Merger Agreement Termination);
|
|
|
|
Medcos right to terminate to enter into a transaction
representing a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
the various contingent liabilities, including pending legal
proceedings, to which Medco is subject;
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
that some officers and directors of Express Scripts have
interests in the mergers that may be different from, in addition
to or in conflict with the interests of Express Scripts
stockholders (see The Mergers Interests of
Express Scripts Officers and Directors in the Transaction);
|
|
|
|
the risk that the additional debt incurred in connection with
the mergers could have a negative impact on Express
Scripts ratings and operational flexibility;
|
|
|
|
in light of turbulence in the credit markets, the possibility
that the financing for the transaction may not be available and
that Express Scripts could be liable for damages under the
merger agreement if it failed to consummate the merger agreement
when it would otherwise be required to do so;
|
|
|
|
the fees and expenses associated with completing the
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
various other risks associated with the mergers and the business
of Express Scripts, Medco and the combined company described
under Risk Factors.
|
The Express Scripts board believed and continues to believe that
these potential risks and drawbacks are greatly outweighed by
the potential benefits that the Express Scripts board expects
Express Scripts to achieve as a result of the proposed mergers.
The Express Scripts board realized that there can be no
assurance about future results, including results considered or
expected as disclosed in the foregoing reasons.
The foregoing discussion addresses the material information and
factors that the Express Scripts board reviewed in its
consideration of the mergers.
Opinions
of Financial Advisors to Express Scripts
Opinion
of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Express Scripts retained Credit Suisse as its financial advisor
in connection with the mergers. On July 20, 2011, at a
meeting of the Express Scripts board held to evaluate the
proposed mergers, Credit Suisse delivered to the Express Scripts
board its oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written
opinion dated July 20, 2011, to the effect that, as of that
date and based on and subject to various assumptions, matters
considered and limitations described in such opinion, the Medco
merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view,
to Express Scripts.
The full text of Credit Suisses written opinion, dated
July 20, 2011, to the Express Scripts board, which sets
forth, among other things, the procedures followed, assumptions
made, matters considered and limitations on the scope of review
undertaken, is attached as Annex D hereto and is
incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference in its entirety. The description of the opinion set
forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion.
Credit Suisses opinion was provided to the Express Scripts
board (in its capacity as such) for its information in
connection with its evaluation of the Medco merger consideration
and did not address any other aspect of the proposed mergers,
including the relative merits of the mergers as compared to
alternative transactions or strategies that might be available
to Express Scripts or the underlying business decision of
Express Scripts to proceed with the mergers. The opinion does
not constitute advice or a recommendation to any stockholder as
to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matter
relating to the proposed mergers or otherwise.
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other information relating to Express Scripts
and Medco provided to or discussed with Credit Suisse by Express
Scripts and Medco, including financial forecasts relating to
Express Scripts and relating to Medco prepared by the respective
managements of Express Scripts and Medco (as adjusted, in the
case of Medco, by Express Scripts management);
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
met with the managements of Express Scripts and Medco to discuss
the respective businesses and prospects of Express Scripts and
Medco;
|
|
|
|
considered certain financial and stock market data of Express
Scripts and Medco, and Credit Suisse compared that data with
similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses
Credit Suisse deemed similar to that of Express Scripts and
Medco;
|
|
|
|
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other business combinations and transactions
which have been effected or announced; and
|
|
|
|
considered such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
which Credit Suisse deemed relevant.
|
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not
independently verify any of the foregoing information and Credit
Suisse assumed and relied upon such information being complete
and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the
financial forecasts for Express Scripts and Medco that Credit
Suisse utilized in its analyses, the managements of Express
Scripts and Medco advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse
assumed, that such forecasts (including, in the case of Medco,
adjustments to such forecasts by Express Scripts
management) were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the
best currently available estimates and judgments of the
managements of Express Scripts and Medco, as the case may be, as
to the future financial performance of Express Scripts and the
future financial performance of Medco. With respect to estimates
provided to Credit Suisse by Express Scripts management
regarding cost savings and synergies anticipated to result from
the mergers, Express Scripts management advised Credit
Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, that such estimates were
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of Express Scripts
management and that such cost savings and synergies would be
realized in the amounts and at the times indicated by such
estimates.
Credit Suisse also assumed with Express Scripts consent
that, for federal income tax purposes, the Express Scripts
merger and the Medco merger, taken together, would qualify as an
exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of
the Code. In addition, Credit Suisse relied upon, with Express
Scripts consent and without independent verification, the
assessments of Express Scripts management as to
(i) business trends and prospects for, and governmental and
regulatory policies and matters affecting, the pharmacy benefit
management, specialty pharmacy and broader healthcare industry
and the potential impact thereof on Express Scripts, Medco or
the contemplated benefits of the mergers and
(ii) Medcos relationships, including, without
limitation, material agreements, with clients, pharmacy
providers, pharmaceutical manufacturers and other suppliers and
Express Scripts ability to integrate the businesses and
operations of Express Scripts and Medco. Credit Suisse assumed,
with Express Scripts consent, that there would be no
developments with respect to any such matters that would be
material to Credit Suisses analyses or opinion.
Credit Suisse further assumed, with Express Scripts
consent, that, in the course of obtaining any regulatory or
third party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with
the mergers, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition,
including any divestiture requirements, would be imposed that
would have an adverse effect on Express Scripts, Medco or the
contemplated benefits of the mergers and that the mergers would
be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger
agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of any
material term, condition or agreement. In addition, Credit
Suisse was not requested to, and did not, make an independent
evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent
or otherwise) of Express Scripts or Medco, nor was Credit Suisse
furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals.
Credit Suisses opinion addressed only the fairness, from a
financial point of view and as of the date of its opinion, to
Express Scripts of the Medco merger consideration and did not
address any other aspect or implication of the mergers,
including, without limitation, the form or structure of the
Medco merger consideration or the mergers (or tax or accounting
consequences) or any agreement, arrangement or understanding
entered into in connection with the mergers or otherwise. Credit
Suisses opinion also did not address the fairness of the
amount or nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any
compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any
party to the mergers, or class of such persons, relative to the
Medco
110
merger consideration or otherwise. The issuance of Credit
Suisses opinion was approved by Credit Suisses
authorized internal committee.
Credit Suisses opinion was necessarily based upon
information made available to it as of the date of its opinion
and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they
existed and could be evaluated on that date. Credit Suisse did
not express any opinion as to what the value of shares of New
Express Scripts common stock actually would be when issued
pursuant to the mergers or the prices at which shares of Express
Scripts common stock, Medco common stock or New Express Scripts
common stock would trade at any time. Except as described in
this summary, the Express Scripts board imposed no other
limitations on Credit Suisse with respect to the investigations
made or procedures followed in rendering its opinion.
In preparing its opinion to the Express Scripts board, Credit
Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative
analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit
Suisses analyses described below is not a complete
description of the analyses underlying Credit Suisses
opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process involving various determinations as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the
application of those methods to the particular circumstances
and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to
partial analysis or summary description. Credit Suisse arrived
at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses
undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in
isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or
method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information
presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses
and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes
underlying its analyses and opinion.
In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond Express Scripts
control. No company, transaction or business used in Credit
Suisses analyses is identical to Express Scripts, Medco or
the proposed mergers, and an evaluation of the results of those
analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses
involve complex considerations and judgments concerning
financial and operating characteristics and other factors that
could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of
the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed. The
estimates contained in Credit Suisses analyses and the
ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are
not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of
future results or values, which may be significantly more or
less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In
addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or
securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold or
acquired. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results
derived from, Credit Suisses analyses are inherently
subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisse was not requested to, and it did not, recommend
the specific consideration payable in the proposed mergers,
which Medco merger consideration was determined through
negotiations between Express Scripts and Medco, and the decision
to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the
Express Scripts board. Credit Suisses opinion and
financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by
the Express Scripts board in its evaluation of the proposed
mergers and should not be viewed as determinative of the views
of Express Scripts board or management with respect to the
mergers or the Medco merger consideration.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
provided to the Express Scripts board in connection with Credit
Suisses opinion. The financial analyses summarized
below include information presented in tabular format. In order
to fully understand Credit Suisses financial analyses, the
tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The
tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below
without considering the full narrative description of the
financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions
underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete
view of Credit Suisses financial analyses. For
purposes of the financial analyses summarized below, the term
implied Medco merger consideration refers to the
total implied value of the Medco merger consideration of $70.80
per share calculated as the sum of (i) the $28.80 per share
cash consideration to be paid in the Medco merger plus
(ii) the $42.00 per share implied value of the stock
consideration to be paid in the Medco merger based on the
111
Medco merger exchange ratio of 0.81 and Express Scripts
closing stock price of $51.85 per share on July 19, 2011.
Medco
Financial Analyses
Medco Selected Companies Analysis. Credit
Suisse reviewed certain financial and stock market information
of Medco and the following four selected publicly traded
companies, including Express Scripts, with operations in whole
or in part in the pharmacy benefit management industry, which is
the industry in which Medco primarily operates:
|
|
|
|
|
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
CVS Corporation
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
SXC Health Solutions Corp.
|
Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, enterprise values of
the selected companies, calculated as equity values based on
closing stock prices on July 19, 2011, plus debt, less cash
and other adjustments, as a multiple of calendar years 2011,
2012 and, to the extent publicly available, 2013 estimated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
which we refer to as EBITDA. Credit Suisse also reviewed equity
values of the selected companies, based on closing stock prices
on July 19, 2011, as a multiple of calendar years 2011,
2012 and 2013 estimated cash earnings per share, which we refer
to as cash EPS. Credit Suisse then applied ranges derived from
the selected companies of selected multiples of calendar years
2011, 2012 and 2013 estimated EBITDA of 8.5x to 10.5x, 8.0x to
9.5x and 7.0x to 8.5x, respectively, and selected multiples of
calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013 estimated cash EPS of 13.0x
to 16.5x, 11.0x to 13.5x and 9.5x to 12.0x, respectively, to
corresponding data of Medco. Financial data of the selected
companies were based on publicly available research
analysts consensus estimates, public filings and other
publicly available information. Financial data of Medco were
based on public filings and internal estimates of Medcos
management as adjusted by Express Scripts management. This
analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share
reference range for Medco as compared to the implied Medco
merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
|
|
Implied Medco
|
Reference Range
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
$51.00 $64.00
|
|
$
|
70.80
|
|
112
Medco Selected Transactions Analysis. Credit
Suisse reviewed certain financial information of the following
15 selected transactions involving companies with operations in
whole or in part in the pharmacy benefit management industry,
which is the industry in which Medco primarily operates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
|
3/9/11
|
|
|
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc. (unit
of Walgreen Co.)
|
|
8/4/10
|
|
|
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
FutureScripts, LLC (unit of Independence
Blue Cross, Inc.)
|
|
4/13/09
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
NextRx (business of Wellpoint, Inc.)
|
|
6/13/08
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Pharmacy Services Division of Medical
Services Company
|
|
4/8/08
|
|
|
HealthExtras, Inc.
|
|
HospiScript Services, LLC
|
|
2/26/08
|
|
|
SXC Health Solutions Corp.
|
|
National Medical Health Card Systems,
Inc.
|
|
11/1/06
|
|
|
CVS Corporation
|
|
Caremark Rx, Inc.
|
|
9/2/03
|
|
|
Caremark Rx, Inc.
|
|
AdvancePCS
|
|
2/6/02
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
National Prescription Administrators,
Inc.
|
|
7/12/00
|
|
|
Advance Paradigm, Inc.
|
|
PCS Health Systems, Inc. (unit of Rite
Aid Corporation)
|
|
5/4/00
|
|
|
Merck & Co., Inc.
|
|
ProVantage Health Services, Inc. (unit
of ShopKo Stores, Inc.)
|
|
3/1/99
|
|
|
Advance Paradigm, Inc.
|
|
Foundation Health Pharmaceutical
Services, Inc.
|
|
2/9/99
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Diversified Pharmaceutical Services,
Inc. (unit of SmithKline Beecham Corporation)
|
|
11/17/98
|
|
|
Rite Aid Corporation
|
|
PCS Health Systems, Inc. (unit of Eli
Lilly and Company)
|
|
2/20/98
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
ValueRx (unit of Columbia / HCA
Healthcare Corporation)
|
Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, transaction values,
calculated as the purchase prices paid for the target companies
in the selected transactions plus debt, less cash and other
adjustments, both before and after giving effect to the
estimated present value of anticipated tax benefits of the
relevant transaction if publicly disclosed by the acquiror, as a
multiple of, to the extent publicly available, the target
companies latest 12 months EBITDA. The overall low,
mean, median and high latest 12 months EBITDA multiples observed
for the selected transactions were 6.0x, 12.3x, 12.2x and 19.1x,
respectively. In calculating an implied per share reference
range for Medco, Credit Suisse applied a range of selected
multiples of latest 12 months EBITDA derived from the
selected transactions of 10.0x to 14.0x to Medcos EBITDA
for the latest 12 months ended March 31, 2011.
Financial data of the selected transactions were based on
publicly available information, including press releases, public
filings and research analysts estimates. Financial data of
Medco were based on public filings as of March 31, 2011.
This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per
share reference range for Medco, as compared to the implied
Medco merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
|
|
Implied Medco
|
Reference Range
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
$61.00 $89.00
|
|
$
|
70.80
|
|
Medco Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Credit
Suisse performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Medco to
calculate the estimated present value of the standalone
unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Medco was forecasted
to generate during the second half of the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2011 through the full fiscal year ending
December 31, 2016 based on internal estimates of
Medcos management as adjusted by Express Scripts
management (with stock-based compensation treated as a cash
expense). Credit Suisse calculated terminal values for Medco by
applying to Medcos estimated EBITDA for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2016 a range of terminal value EBITDA
multiples of 9.0x to 11.0x. The present value (as of
June 30, 2011) of the cash flows and terminal values
was then calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to
10.0%. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied
per share reference range for
113
Medco (excluding the estimated present value of potential
synergies anticipated by Express Scripts management to
result from the mergers), as compared to the implied Medco
merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
|
|
|
Reference Range
|
|
Implied Medco
|
(Excluding Synergies)
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
$64.00 $83.00
|
|
$
|
70.80
|
|
Based on internal estimates of Express Scripts management,
including such managements initial estimates of potential
net transaction synergies and revised estimates of potential net
transaction synergies, and using discount rates ranging from
8.0% to 10.0%, Credit Suisse then calculated the estimated
present value of (a) potential synergies anticipated by
Express Scripts management to result from the mergers
during the first four fiscal years following the completion of
the mergers and (b) terminal values of potential synergies
calculated by applying a range of terminal value multiples of
9.0x to 11.0x to the estimated fully realized annual pre-tax
synergies anticipated by Express Scripts management to
result from the mergers. Credit Suisse then added the calculated
range of incremental estimated present value attributable to
potential synergies to the approximate implied per share
reference range for Medco derived from the discounted cash flow
analysis of Medco described above. This analysis indicated the
following approximate implied per share reference ranges for
Medco (inclusive of the present value of each of the initial
estimated synergies and revised estimated synergies), as
compared to the implied Medco merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share Reference Range (Including Synergies)
|
|
Implied Medco
|
Initial Estimated Synergies
|
|
Revised Estimated Synergies
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
$85.00 $110.00
|
|
$
|
84.00 $108.00
|
|
|
$
|
70.80
|
|
Express
Scripts Financial Analyses
Express Scripts Selected Companies
Analysis. Credit Suisse reviewed certain
financial and stock market information of Express Scripts and
the following four selected publicly traded companies, including
Medco, with operations in whole or in part in the pharmacy
benefit management industry, which is the industry in which
Express Scripts primarily operates:
|
|
|
|
|
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
|
CVS Corporation
|
|
|
|
Medco
|
|
|
|
SXC Health Solutions Corp.
|
Credit Suisse reviewed, among other things, enterprise values of
the selected companies as a multiple of calendar years 2011,
2012 and, to the extent publicly available, 2013 estimated
EBITDA. Credit Suisse also reviewed equity values of the
selected companies as a multiple of calendar years 2011, 2012
and 2013 estimated cash EPS. Credit Suisse then applied ranges
derived from the selected companies of selected multiples of
calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013 estimated EBITDA of 8.5x to
10.5x, 8.0x to 9.5x and 7.0x to 8.5x, respectively, and selected
multiples of calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013 estimated cash
EPS of 13.0x to 16.5x, 11.0x to 13.5x and 9.5x to 12.0x,
respectively, to corresponding data of Express Scripts.
Financial data of the selected companies were based on publicly
available research analysts consensus estimates, public
filings and other publicly available information. Financial data
of Express Scripts were based on public filings and internal
estimates of Express Scripts management. This analysis
indicated the following approximate implied per share reference
range for Express Scripts, as compared to the closing stock
price of Express Scripts on July 19, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
|
|
Express Scripts Closing
|
Reference Range
|
|
Stock Price on July 19, 2011
|
|
$44.00 $55.00
|
|
$
|
51.85
|
|
Express Scripts Discounted Cash Flow
Analysis. Credit Suisse performed a discounted
cash flow analysis of Express Scripts to calculate the estimated
present value of (a) the standalone unlevered, after-tax
114
free cash flows that Express Scripts was forecasted to generate
during the second half of the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2011 through the full fiscal year ending
December 31, 2016 based on internal estimates of Express
Scripts management (with stock-based compensation treated
as a cash expense) and (b) potential tax benefits
anticipated by Express Scripts management to result from
Express Scripts completed acquisition of the NextRx
pharmacy benefit management services business of WellPoint, Inc.
Credit Suisse calculated terminal values for Express Scripts by
applying to Express Scripts estimated EBITDA for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 a range of terminal
value EBITDA multiples of 9.0x to 11.0x. The present value (as
of June 30, 2011) of the cash flows, tax benefits and
terminal values was then calculated using discount rates ranging
from 8.0% to 10.0%. This analysis indicated the following
approximate implied per share reference range for Express
Scripts, as compared to the closing stock price of Express
Scripts on July 19, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
|
|
Express Scripts Closing
|
Reference Range
|
|
Stock Price on July 19, 2011
|
|
$67.00 $85.00
|
|
$
|
51.85
|
|
Implied
Exchange Ratio Analysis
Using the implied per share reference ranges for Express Scripts
and Medco indicated in the respective selected companies
analyses and discounted cash flow analyses of Express Scripts
and Medco described above, Credit Suisse calculated ranges of
implied exchange ratios of Express Scripts common stock to Medco
common stock. For purposes of this calculation, the implied per
share reference ranges for Medco were adjusted downward by the
amount of the $28.80 per share cash consideration to be paid in
the Medco merger and, in the case of the discounted cash flow
analyses of Express Scripts and Medco, Credit Suisse calculated
implied exchange ratio references ranges both excluding and
including the estimated present value of potential synergies as
described above in Medco Discounted Cash Flow
Analysis. When included, synergies were allocated between
Express Scripts and Medco to reflect the pro forma equity
ownership split of stockholders of Express Scripts and Medco
immediately upon consummation of the mergers. This implied
exchange ratio analysis indicated the following implied exchange
ratio reference ranges, as compared to the stock consideration
exchange ratio provided for the Medco merger:
Implied
Exchange Ratio Reference Range Based on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash
|
|
Discounted Cash
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash
|
|
Flow Analysis
|
|
Flow Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
Flow Analysis
|
|
(Including Initial
|
|
(Including Revised
|
|
Medco Merger
|
Selected
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Stock Consideration
|
Companies Analysis
|
|
Synergies)
|
|
Synergies)
|
|
Synergies)
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
0.4155 0.8123
|
|
0.4153 0.8167
|
|
0.5638 1.0538
|
|
0.5528 1.0356
|
|
0.81
|
Other
Information
Credit Suisse also noted for the Express Scripts board certain
additional factors that were not considered part of Credit
Suisses financial analyses with respect to its opinion but
were referenced for informational purposes, including, among
other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
illustrative discounted cash flow analyses of each of Medco and
Express Scripts based on estimates from publicly available Wall
Street research analyst reports, which indicated a range of
illustrative per share values for Medco, both excluding and
including the estimated present value of potential synergies
anticipated by Express Scripts management to result from
the mergers, of approximately $64.00 to $82.00 (excluding
synergies), $85.00 to $108.00 (including initial estimated
synergies) and $83.00 to $106.00 (including revised estimated
synergies) and a range of illustrative per share values for
Express Scripts of approximately $66.00 to $85.00;
|
|
|
|
one-year forward per share price targets for Medco common stock
and Express Scripts common stock in publicly available Wall
Street research analyst reports, which indicated low and high
per share price
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
targets for Medco of $53.00 to $77.00 and low and high per share
price targets for Express Scripts of $53.00 to $71.00;
|
|
|
|
|
|
illustrative exchange ratios of Express Scripts common stock to
Medco common stock based on the respective low and high per
share price targets for Express Scripts and Medco described
above (adjusted downward, in the case of Medco, by the amount of
the $28.80 per share cash consideration to be paid in the Medco
merger), which indicated a range of illustrative exchange ratios
of approximately 0.3408 to 0.9094;
|
|
|
|
historical trading prices of Medco common stock and Express
Scripts common stock during the 52-week period ended
July 19, 2011, which reflected low and high per share
prices for Medco during such period of approximately $43.00 to
$65.00 and low and high per share prices for Express Scripts
during such period of approximately $42.00 to $61.00; and
|
|
|
|
premiums paid in selected transactions generally, and premiums
paid in selected transactions specifically in the healthcare
industry, with transaction values of $1 billion or more and
$10 billion or more announced between January 1, 2005
and July 19, 2011, which, after applying a selected range
of premiums derived from the closing stock prices of the target
companies in such transactions
one-day,
one-week and one-month prior to public announcement of the
relevant transactions of approximately 24% to 32%, 24% to 34%
and 26% to 40%, respectively, to Medcos closing stock
price on July 19, 2011 indicated an implied per share
reference range for Medco of approximately $68.00 to $79.00.
|
Miscellaneous
Express Scripts selected Credit Suisse to act as its financial
advisor in connection with the mergers based on Credit
Suisses qualifications, experience, reputation and
familiarity with Express Scripts. Credit Suisse is an
internationally recognized investment banking firm and is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities
in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
Express Scripts has agreed to pay Credit Suisse for its
financial advisory services to Express Scripts in connection
with the proposed mergers an aggregate fee of up to
$35 million, of which $3.75 million was payable upon
delivery of Credit Suisses opinion, $21.25 million is
contingent upon completion of the mergers and up to an
additional $10 million may be payable in the sole
discretion of Express Scripts upon consummation of the mergers.
Credit Suisse and certain of its affiliates expect to provide or
arrange financing for the mergers, including acting as joint
lead arranger and administrative agent of the $14.0 billion
bridge facility, $4.0 billion term loan and
$1.5 billion revolving credit facility, for which services
Credit Suisse and certain of its affiliates currently expect to
receive aggregate fees of approximately $33 million, and
Credit Suisse and certain of its affiliates expect to receive
additional compensation in the event that Express Scripts
executes a capital markets transaction in connection with such
financing. In addition, Express Scripts has agreed to reimburse
Credit Suisse for its expenses, including fees and expenses of
legal counsel, and to indemnify Credit Suisse and related
parties for certain liabilities and other items, including
liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of or
related to its engagement. Credit Suisse and its affiliates in
the past have provided and currently are providing investment
banking and other financial services to Express Scripts
unrelated to the mergers, for which services Credit Suisse and
its affiliates have received and will receive compensation
including, during the two-year period prior to delivery of
Credit Suisses opinion, aggregate fees of approximately
$38 million for acting as (i) joint book-running
manager for a $1.5 billion senior notes offering, a
$2.5 billion senior notes offering and an approximately
$1.6 billion common stock offering of Express Scripts,
(ii) financial advisor to Express Scripts in connection
with Express Scripts $4.675 billion acquisition of
the NextRx pharmacy benefit management services business of
WellPoint, Inc. and lead arranger for a related bridge term loan
financing undertaken by Express Scripts and (iii) joint
lead arranger and joint book-running manager for, or
administrative agent for and lender under, an existing
$750 million revolving credit facility of Express Scripts.
Credit Suisse is a full service securities firm engaged in
securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing
investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary
116
course of business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may
acquire, hold or sell, for Credit Suisses and its
affiliates own accounts and the accounts of customers, equity,
debt and other securities and financial instruments (including
bank loans and other obligations) of Express Scripts, Medco and
their respective affiliates and any other company that may be
involved in the mergers, as well as provide investment banking
and other financial services to such companies. In addition,
Credit Suisse and its affiliates maintain commercial (including
customer) relationships with Express Scripts.
Opinion
of Citigroup
Express Scripts has retained Citigroup as its financial advisor
to advise the Express Scripts board in connection with the
mergers.
In connection with Citigroups engagement, Express Scripts
requested Citigroup to evaluate the fairness, from a financial
point of view, of the Medco merger consideration to be issued
and paid in the Medco merger by Express Scripts as of the date
of Citigroups opinion. On July 20, 2011, at a meeting
of the Express Scripts board, Citigroup rendered to the Express
Scripts board an oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery
of a written opinion dated July 20, 2011, to the effect
that, as of that date and based on and subject to the matters,
considerations and limitations set forth in the opinion,
Citigroups work described below and other factors it
deemed relevant, the Medco merger consideration to be issued and
paid by Express Scripts was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Express Scripts.
The full text of Citigroups written opinion, dated
July 20, 2011, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by Citigroup in rendering
its opinion, is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex E and is incorporated into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference in its
entirety. The summary of Citigroups opinion set forth
below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text
of the opinion. You are urged to read the opinion carefully and
in its entirety. Citigroups opinion, the issuance of which
was approved by Citigroups authorized internal committee,
was provided to the Express Scripts board in connection with its
evaluation of the proposed mergers and was limited to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date of the
opinion, to Express Scripts of the Medco merger consideration to
be issued and paid by Express Scripts. Citigroups opinion
does not address any other aspects or implications of the
mergers and does not constitute a recommendation to any
stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any
matters relating to the proposed mergers. Citigroups
opinion does not address the underlying business decision of
Express Scripts to effect the mergers, the relative merits of
the mergers as compared to any alternative business strategies
that might exist for Express Scripts or the effect of any other
transaction in which Express Scripts may engage. The following
is a summary of Citigroups opinion and the methodology
that Citigroup used to render its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Citigroup, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
held discussions with certain senior officers, directors and
other representatives and advisors of Express Scripts and
certain senior officers and other representatives and advisors
of Medco concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of
Express Scripts and Medco and the effects of the mergers on the
financial condition and future prospects of Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
examined certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
examined certain financial forecasts and other information and
data relating to Express Scripts and Medco (certain of which
information relating to Medco was adjusted by Express
Scripts management, and Citigroup was instructed by
Express Scripts to use such information as adjusted for purposes
of its analysis), respectively, which were provided to or
discussed with Citigroup by the respective managements of
Express Scripts and Medco, including information relating to the
potential strategic implications and operational benefits
(including the amount, timing and achievability thereof)
anticipated by
|
117
the management of Express Scripts (with input from the
management of Medco) to result from the mergers, which are
further described in the section entitled The
Mergers Certain Financial Forecasts beginning
on page 124;
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms of the mergers as set forth in the
merger agreement in relation to, among other things, current and
historical market prices of Express Scripts common stock and
Medcos common stock, the historical and projected earnings
and other operating data of Express Scripts and Medco and the
capitalization and financial condition of Express Scripts and
Medco;
|
|
|
|
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other transactions which Citigroup considered
relevant in evaluating the mergers;
|
|
|
|
analyzed certain financial, stock market and other publicly
available information relating to the businesses of other
companies whose operations Citigroup considered relevant in
evaluating those of Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
evaluated certain potential pro forma financial effects of the
mergers on Express Scripts based on the information provided to
Citigroup by the management of Express Scripts; and
|
|
|
|
conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered
such other information and financial, economic and market
criteria as Citigroup deemed appropriate in arriving at its
opinion.
|
In rendering its opinion, Citigroup assumed and relied, without
independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of
all financial and other information and data publicly available
or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with
Citigroup and upon the assurances of the managements of Express
Scripts and Medco that they were not aware of any relevant
information that was omitted or that remained undisclosed to
Citigroup. With respect to the financial forecasts and other
information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or
discussed with Citigroup, relating to Express Scripts and Medco,
respectively, and in the case of certain pro forma financial
effects of, and strategic implications and operating benefits
resulting from, the mergers, Citigroup was advised by the
management of Express Scripts that such forecasts and other
information and data were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the management of Express Scripts as to the future financial
performance of Express Scripts and Medco, such strategic
implications and operational benefits (including the amount,
timing and achievability thereof) anticipated to result from the
mergers and the other matters covered thereby, and Citigroup
assumed, with Express Scripts consent, that the financial
results (including such potential strategic implications and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the mergers)
reflected in such forecasts and other information and data would
be realized in the amounts and at the time anticipated.
Citigroup did not make, and it was not provided with, an
independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Medco and Citigroup did not make
any physical inspection of the properties or assets of Medco.
Citigroup assumed, with Express Scripts consent, that the
mergers will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the
merger agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of
any material term, condition or agreement, and that, in the
course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third-party
approvals, consents and releases for the merger, no delay,
limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would
have an adverse effect on Express Scripts, Medco or the
contemplated benefits of the merger. Citigroup also assumed that
the representations and warranties made by Express Scripts and
Medco in the merger agreement were and will be true and correct
in all respects material to its analysis. Finally, with the
consent of Express Scripts, Citigroup relied upon the advice
Express Scripts received from its legal, regulatory, accounting
and tax advisors as to all legal, regulatory, accounting and tax
matters relating to the mergers and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
Citigroups opinion is limited to the fairness as of
July 20, 2011, from a financial point of view, to Express
Scripts of the Medco merger consideration to be issued and paid
by Express Scripts in connection with the Medco merger,
considered in the aggregate, and Citigroup did not express any
opinion as to the fairness of the mergers to the holders of any
particular class of securities, creditors or other
constituencies of Express Scripts or Medco. Citigroup expressed
no opinion as to what the value of Express Scripts common stock
actually will be when issued pursuant to the mergers or the
price at which Express Scripts common
118
stock will trade at any time. Furthermore, Citigroup expressed
no view as to, and its opinion did not address, the underlying
business decision of Express Scripts to effect the mergers, the
relative merits of the mergers as compared to any alternative
business strategies that might exist for Express Scripts or the
effect of any other transaction in which Express Scripts might
engage. Citigroups opinion was necessarily based upon
information available to it, and financial, stock market and
other conditions existing, as of July 20, 2011. Citigroup
informed the Express Scripts board that subsequent developments
may affect its opinion and that Citigroup did not have any
obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
In preparing its opinion, Citigroup performed a variety of
financial, comparative and other analyses, including those
described below. The summary of these analyses is not a complete
description of the analyses underlying Citigroups opinion.
The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex analytical
process involving various determinations as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the
application of those methods to the particular circumstances
and, therefore, a financial opinion is not readily susceptible
to summary description. Citigroup arrived at its ultimate
opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it
and assessed as a whole, and does not draw, in isolation,
conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of
analysis for purposes of its opinion. Accordingly, Citigroup
believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and
that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing
on information presented in tabular format, without considering
all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the
processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In its analyses, Citigroup considered industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters existing as of the date of its opinion, many of
which are beyond the control of Express Scripts and Medco. No
company, business or transaction used in those analyses as a
comparison is identical or directly comparable to Express
Scripts, Medco or the mergers, and an evaluation of those
analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses
involve complex considerations and judgments concerning
financial and operating characteristics and other factors that
could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of
the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed.
The estimates contained in Citigroups analyses and the
valuation ranges resulting from any particular analysis are not
necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future
results or values, which may be significantly more or less
favorable than those suggested by its analyses. In addition,
analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do
not necessarily purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold.
Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived
from, Citigroups analyses are inherently subject to
substantial uncertainty.
The type and amount of consideration payable in the mergers was
determined through negotiations between Express Scripts and
Medco, and the decision to enter into the mergers was solely
that of the Express Scripts board. Citigroup was not requested
to, and Citigroup did not, participate in the negotiation or
structuring of the mergers. Citigroups opinion was only
one of many factors considered by the Express Scripts board in
its evaluation of the mergers and should not be viewed as
determinative of the views of the Express Scripts board or
Express Scripts management with respect to the mergers or the
Medco merger consideration or the Express Scripts merger
consideration.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
presented to the Express Scripts board in connection with the
delivery of Citigroups opinion. The financial analyses
summarized below include information presented in tabular
format. In order to fully understand Citigroups financial
analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each
summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete
description of the financial analyses. Considering the data
below without considering the full narrative description of the
financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions
underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete
view of Citigroups financial analyses.
Valuation
Analyses of Medco
In connection with Citigroups financial analysis
summarized below, Citigroup reviewed the financial forecasts and
other information and data relating to Medco which were prepared
by Medcos management and
119
adjusted by Express Scripts management, which we refer to
as the Medco adjusted management case and which is described in
the section entitled The Mergers Certain
Financial Forecasts on page 124. Citigroup was
instructed by Express Scripts management to use the Medco
adjusted management case for purposes of its analysis and
rendering its opinion.
Historical Trading Analysis. Citigroup
reviewed the daily closing prices per share of Medcos
common stock to derive a 52-week trading range for Medco for the
period ended July 18, 2011. Citigroup observed that the
52-week trading range for Medcos common stock for such
period was $43.48 to $65.30 per share and the closing price per
share of Medcos common stock on July 18, 2011 was
$53.82. Citigroup noted that the Medco merger consideration was
above the 52-week trading range of Medcos common stock.
Discounted Research Price Targets. Citigroup
compared the Medco merger consideration to the
12-month
price per share targets for Medcos common stock of
twenty-one Wall Street research analysts, as of July 18,
2011, found in publicly available equity research on Medco. As
of that date, the twenty-one research analysts that covered
Medco published price per share targets for Medcos common
stock between $53.00 and $75.00. Citigroup then discounted these
price targets using Medcos cost of equity of 9.7%, which
was calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model, resulting
in a per share target range of $48.95 to $69.69. Citigroup noted
that the Medco merger consideration was within the range of
research price targets and was above the range of price targets
after being discounted for Medcos cost of equity.
Premia Paid Analysis. Citigroup reviewed
publicly available data relating to transactions involving
U.S. healthcare services public targets with transaction
value in excess of $1.0 billion announced since 2001.
Citigroup reviewed the implied premia paid in these transactions
over the closing stock prices of the target companies in such
transactions one trading day prior to public announcement of the
relevant transaction based on information publicly available at
that time. Citigroup observed the interdecile range of premia
among the selected transactions of 13.6% (for transactions in
the 10th percentile) to 50.4% (for transactions in the
90th percentile). Citigroup applied such selected premia to
the closing price of Medcos common stock on July 18,
2011 of $53.82 per share. This analysis indicated the following
implied per share equity value reference range for Medco, as
compared to the Medco merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Per Share Equity Reference Range
|
|
Medco Merger
|
for Medcos Common Stock
|
|
Consideration
|
|
$61.14 $80.93
|
|
$
|
70.69
|
|
Citigroup also considered the premia paid in two other public
pharmacy benefit manager transactions, the acquisition of
Advance PCS Inc. by Caremark RX, Inc. and the acquisition of
Caremark RX, Inc. by CVS Corporation and noted that the
premia paid in those transactions exceeded the premium paid to
Medco by Express Scripts.
Selected Company Trading Analysis. Citigroup
reviewed financial and stock market information and derived
certain trading multiples for each of Medco, Express Scripts and
another publicly traded company that operates in the pharmacy
benefit management industry, Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.,
and compared the derived multiples to the Medco adjusted
management case 2011 EBITDA (calculated as earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of
$2,632 million, as well as consensus Wall Street research
estimates of Medcos 2011 EBITDA of $2,661 million.
Each of these estimated Medco EBITDA calculations were adjusted
on a historical pro forma basis for anticipated client losses in
2012 and the anticipated loss of the United Health contract in
2013.
The trading multiples considered by Citigroup in the course of
this analysis were:
|
|
|
|
|
firm value as a multiple of estimated EBITDA for each of the
following periods, Last Twelve Months (LTM), calendar years 2011
and 2012; and
|
|
|
|
stock price per share as a multiple of estimated earnings per
share, for each of calendar years 2011 and 2012.
|
Financial information and data for Medco, Express Scripts and
the comparable company were based on information available in
company filings, press releases, Wall Street research and, with
respect to Catalyst
120
Health Solutions, Inc., certain company conference call
transcripts, as well estimates provided by Express Scripts
management for Express Scripts and the Medco adjusted management
case, which case was further adjusted on a historical pro forma
basis for anticipated client losses in 2012 and the anticipated
loss of the United Health contract in 2013. Financial data for
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. was based on publicly available
estimates, adjusted pro forma for the full year effect of
acquisition of Walgreens Health Initiatives. The results of this
analysis were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value/EBITDA
|
|
Price/Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
LTM
|
|
2011E
|
|
2012E
|
|
2011E
|
|
2012E
|
|
Median
|
|
|
11.1
|
x
|
|
|
10.3
|
x
|
|
|
8.8
|
x
|
|
|
16.2
|
x
|
|
|
13.2
|
x
|
Mean
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Based on the comparable company metrics analyzed, Citigroup then
selected a Firm Value/2011E EBITDA multiple range of 9.9x to
12.4x (representing the entire range of comparable companies
multiples) and applied it to the various estimates of
Medcos 2011 EBITDA, as described below. This analysis
indicated a $51.14 to $66.23 per share equity value reference
range for Medcos common stock, using the Medco adjusted
management case estimate of 2011 EBITDA, which was adjusted on a
historical pro forma basis for anticipated client losses in 2012
and the anticipated loss of the United Health contract in 2013,
and a $51.81 to $67.08 per share equity value reference range
for Medcos common stock using Wall Street consensus
research estimates of Medcos 2011 adjusted EBITDA, which
was adjusted on a historical pro forma basis for anticipated
client losses in 2012 and the anticipated loss of the United
Health contract in 2013, in each case as compared to the Medco
merger consideration of $70.69 per share.
Selected Precedent Transaction Analysis. Using
public filings and publicly available information, and
additional information from Express Scripts management,
Citigroup reviewed financial data for the following five
selected transactions. These transactions were selected because,
as is the case with the proposed transaction, they involved the
acquisition of pharmacy benefit management companies that
Citigroup deemed relevant to the proposed transaction based on
their general compatibility for the last 10 years and based
on Citigroups experience with mergers and acquisitions.
Citigroup chose such transactions based on, among other things,
the similarity of the applicable target or acquiring companies
in the transactions to Medco or Express Scripts, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Firm Value
|
|
Firm Value / Standalone Target LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2011
|
|
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Walgreen Health Initiatives. Inc.
|
|
$525
|
|
|
12.4
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2009
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
WellPoint Inc.s NextRx subsidiaries
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
12.7
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2006
|
|
CVS Corporation
|
|
Caremark RX, Inc.
|
|
27,715
|
|
|
15.5
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2003
|
|
Caremark RX, Inc.
|
|
AdvancePCS Inc.
|
|
5,662
|
|
|
13.7
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2002
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
National Prescription Administrators, Inc.
|
|
450
|
|
|
12.2
|
x
|
Citigroup reviewed, among other things, firm value in each
transaction as multiples of the LTM EBITDA for each target. This
analysis implied firm value multiples of LTM adjusted EBITDA
ranging from 12.2x to 15.5x, with a mean and a median multiple
of 13.3x and 12.7x, respectively.
Citigroup applied this range of multiples to the Medco adjusted
management case LTM adjusted EBITDA, which case was adjusted on
a historical pro forma basis for anticipated client losses in
2012 and the anticipated loss of the United Health contract in
2013, of $2,547 million. This analysis indicated the
following per share equity reference range for Medco as compared
to the per share Medco merger consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity Value Reference
|
|
Medco Merger
|
Range for Medco
|
|
Consideration
|
|
$62.64 $82.07
|
|
$
|
70.69
|
|
Citigroup noted that the proposed Medco merger consideration was
in line with the implied equity value range per Medco share
yielded by Citigroups selected precedent transaction
analysis. Financial data for the selected precedent transactions
were based upon public filings, Express Scripts
management, publicly available information at the time of
announcement of the final terms of each transaction, and
financial data for Medco were based upon the Medco adjusted
management case, which case was further adjusted on a historical
pro forma basis for anticipated client losses in 2012 and the
anticipated loss of the United Health contract in 2013.
121
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. In order to
estimate the value of Medcos stock, Citigroup performed a
discounted cash flow analysis of Medco. Citigroup performed a
discounted cash flow analysis to calculate the present value of
the standalone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flow that Medco
could generate from June 30, 2011 through December 31,
2015. Stock-based compensation expenses were treated as a cash
expense for purposes of determining such unlevered, after-tax
cash flow. This analysis was conducted based on the Medco as
adjusted management case, and was performed both with and
without the synergies, of approximately $1.1 billion,
estimated to result from the mergers by Express Scripts
management.
Citigroup calculated a range of estimated terminal values by
applying a range of LTM EBITDA terminal value multiples of 10.4x
to 11.1x, representing a range of Express Scripts and
Medcos multiples of Firm Value/LTM EBITDA, to the Medco
adjusted management case estimated fiscal year 2015 terminal
EBITDA. The estimate of LTM EBITDA from the Medco adjusted
management case was further adjusted on a historical pro forma
basis for anticipated client losses in 2012 and the anticipated
loss of the United Health contract in 2013, which amount, as so
adjusted, was used to compute Medcos multiple of Firm
Value/LTM EBITDA. The unlevered, after-tax free cash flows and
terminal values were discounted to present value as of
June 30, 2011 using discount rates ranging from 7.63% to
9.09%, which range was derived taking into consideration, among
other things, the estimated weighted average cost of capital for
Medco based in part on Capital Asset Pricing Model using
selected public company market data.
Based on this analysis, Citigroup then calculated the following
implied per share equity reference range, both without and with
synergies, for Medcos common stock, as compared to the per
share Medco merger consideration to be paid in connection with
the Medco merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Range for Medcos
|
|
Per Share Medco Merger
|
Case
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Consideration
|
|
Without Synergies
|
|
|
$75.72 $84.20
|
|
|
$
|
70.69
|
|
With Synergies
|
|
|
$91.40 $102.72
|
|
|
$
|
70.69
|
|
Valuation
Analyses of Express Scripts
Historical Trading Analysis. Citigroup
reviewed the daily closing prices per share of Express Scripts
common stock to derive a 52-week trading range for Express
Scripts for the period ended July 18, 2011. Citigroup
observed that the 52-week trading range for Express Scripts
common stock for such period was $42.12 to $60.66 per share.
Discounted Research Price Targets. Citigroup
reviewed the
12-month
price per share targets for Express Scripts common stock of
twenty-one Wall Street analysts, as of July 18, 2011, found
in publicly available equity research from FactSet on Express
Scripts. As of that date, the twenty-one research analysts that
covered Express Scripts published price per share targets for
Express Scripts common stock between $53.00 and $72.00.
Citigroup then discounted these price targets using Express
Scripts cost of equity of 8.9%, which was calculated using the
Capital Asset Pricing Model, resulting in a per share target
range of $49.24 to $67.39.
Selected Company Trading Analysis. Citigroup
reviewed financial and stock market information and derived
certain trading multiples for each of Express Scripts, Medco and
another publicly traded company that operates in the pharmacy
benefit management industry, Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.,
and compared the derived multiples to Express Scripts
management estimated 2011 EBITDA of $2,896.0 million, as
well as consensus Wall Street research estimates of Express
Scripts 2011 EBITDA of $2,867.0 million.
The trading multiples considered by Citigroup in the course of
this analysis were:
|
|
|
|
|
firm value as a multiple of estimated EBITDA for each of the
following periods, LTM, calendar years 2011 and 2012; and
|
|
|
|
stock price per share as a multiple of estimated earnings per
share, for each of calendar years 2011 and 2012.
|
122
Financial information and data for Express Scripts, Medco and
the comparable company were based on information available in
company filings, press releases, Wall Street research, and, with
respect to Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc., certain company
conference call transcripts, as well estimates provided by
Express Scripts management for Express Scripts and the
Medco adjusted management case, which case was further adjusted
on a historical pro forma basis for anticipated client losses in
2012 and the anticipated loss of the United Health contract in
2013. Financial data for Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. was
based on publicly available estimates, adjusted pro forma for
the full year impact of acquisition of Walgreens Health
Initiatives. The results of this analysis were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firm Value/EBITDA
|
|
Price/Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
LTM
|
|
2011E
|
|
2012E
|
|
2011E
|
|
2012E
|
|
Median
|
|
|
11.1
|
x
|
|
|
10.3
|
x
|
|
|
8.8
|
x
|
|
|
16.2
|
x
|
|
|
13.2
|
x
|
Mean
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Based on the comparable company metrics analyzed, Citigroup then
selected a Firm Value/2011E EBITDA multiple range of 9.9x to
12.4x (representing the entire range of comparable companies
multiples) and applied it to the various estimates of Express
Scripts 2011 EBITDA, as described below. This analysis
indicated a $50.37 to $63.59 per share equity value reference
range for Express Scripts common stock, using Express
Scripts management estimate of 2011 EBITDA, and a $49.84
to $62.93 per share equity value reference range for Express
Scripts common stock using Wall Street consensus research
estimates of Express Scripts 2011 EBITDA, in each case, as
compared to the closing price of Express Scripts common stock of
$51.72 on July 18, 2011.
Relative
Valuation Analyses of Express Scripts and Medco
Citigroup also considered in its analysis the relative values of
Express Scripts and Medco. The comparison of relative values
included a comparison of historical stock price performance, of
Express Scripts and Medco, over the past five-year and one -year
periods, and relative discounted cash flow valuations of Express
Scripts and Medco.
Citigroup conducted relative discounted cash flow valuations of
Express Scripts and Medco (excluding any potential synergies)
and computed the discounts which Express Scripts and
Medcos trading values, as of July 18, 2011, bear to
their respective discounted cash flow valuations.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis of Medco. The
discounted cash flow analysis for Medco is described above.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis of Express
Scripts. Citigroup performed a discounted cash
flow analysis to calculate the present value of the standalone,
unlevered, after tax free cash flow that Express Scripts could
generate from June 30, 2011 through December 31, 2015.
Stock-based compensation expenses were treated as a cash expense
for purposes of determining such unlevered, after-tax free cash
flow. This analysis was conducted based on internal estimates
provided by Express Scripts management as described in the
section entitled The Mergers Certain Financial
Forecasts on page 124.
Citigroup calculated a range of estimated terminal values by
applying a range of LTM EBITDA terminal value multiples of 10.4x
to 11.1x, representing a range of Express Scripts and
Medcos multiples of Firm Value/LTM EBITDA, to Express
Scripts estimated fiscal year 2015 terminal EBITDA. The
estimate of LTM EBITDA from the Medco adjusted management case
was further adjusted on a historical pro forma basis for
anticipated client losses in 2012 and the anticipated loss of
the United Health contract in 2013, which amount, as so
adjusted, was used to compute Medcos multiple of Firm
Value/LTM EBITDA. The unlevered, after-tax free cash flows and
terminal values were discounted to present value as of
June 30, 2011 using discount rates ranging from 7.48% to
8.84%, which range was derived taking into consideration, among
other things, the estimated weighted average cost of capital for
Express Scripts using selected public company market data. This
analysis for Express Scripts was conducted based on internal
estimates provided by Express Scripts management.
123
Miscellaneous
Under the terms of Citigroups engagement, Express Scripts
has agreed to pay Citigroup for its financial advisory services
in connection with the mergers an aggregate fee of approximately
$15 million, $3.75 million of which was payable upon
delivery by Citigroup of the opinion and the remainder of which
is payable upon consummation of the mergers. Subject to certain
limitations, Express Scripts also has agreed to reimburse
Citigroup for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred by
Citigroup in performing its services, including reasonable fees
and expenses of its legal counsel, and to indemnify Citigroup
and related persons against liabilities, including liabilities
under the federal securities laws, arising out of its
engagement. An affiliate of Citigroup engaged in the commercial
lending business expects to provide or arrange financing for the
mergers, including acting as joint lead arranger and syndication
agent of the $14.0 billion bridge facility,
$4.0 billion term loan and $1.5 billion revolving
credit facility, for which services such affiliate currently
expects to receive aggregate fees of approximately
$33 million, and such affiliate expects to receive
additional compensation in the event that Express Scripts
executes a capital markets transaction in connection with such
financing. For a more complete description of Express
Scripts debt financing for the mergers, see the section
entitled Description of Financing beginning on
page 184.
Citigroup and its affiliates in the past have provided, and
currently provide, services to Express Scripts and its
affiliates unrelated to the proposed mergers, for which services
Citigroup and its affiliates have received and expect to receive
compensation, including, having acted as Express Scripts
financial advisor in connection with (i) its acquisition of
WellPoint Inc.s NextRx subsidiaries announced in April
2009, including, in connection therewith, serving as joint
bookrunner on Express Scripts 5.25% Senior Notes due
2012 (aggregate principal amount $1.0 billion),
6.250% Senior Notes due 2014 (aggregate principal amount
$1.0 billion) and 7.250% Senior Notes due 2019
(aggregate principal amount $500.0 million), and joint
bookrunner on Express Scripts $1.6 billion follow-on
offering of shares of Express Scripts common stock;
(ii) joint lead arranger and syndication agent, and a
participant in, Express Scripts $750.0 million
revolving credit facility; and (iii) joint bookrunner with
respect to Express Scripts 3.125% Senior Notes due
2016 (aggregate principal amount $1.5 billion). Since
January 1, 2010, Citigroup and its affiliates have received
aggregate fees of approximately $1.4 million for investment
banking services provided to Express Scripts and its affiliates,
excluding any fees payable in connection with the pending
mergers. Citigroup and its affiliates also in the past have
provided, and currently provide, services to Medco and its
affiliates unrelated to the proposed merger, for which services
Citigroup and its affiliates have received and expect to receive
compensation, including, without limitation, serving as
co-syndication agent and a participant in Medcos
$3.0 billion Senior Unsecured Credit Facility maturing in
April 2012; and as a participant in Medcos
$600.0 million,
364-day
renewable accounts receivable financing facility. In the
ordinary course of its business, Citigroup and its affiliates
may actively trade or hold the securities of Express Scripts and
Medco for its own account or for the account of its customers
and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position
in such securities. In addition, Citigroup and its affiliates
may maintain relationships with Express Scripts, Medco and their
respective affiliates.
Express Scripts selected Citigroup to provide certain
financial advisory services in connection with the mergers based
on Citigroups reputation and experience. Citigroup is an
internationally recognized investment banking firm which
regularly engages in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other
purposes. The issuance of Citigroups opinion was
authorized by Citigroups fairness opinion committee.
Certain
Financial Forecasts
Medco
Summary Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information
Medco does not as a matter of course make public long-term
projections as to future revenues, earnings or other results due
to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, in connection with the
review of the mergers, Medco management prepared unaudited
prospective
124
financial information for Medco on a stand-alone basis, without
giving effect to the mergers and as if the mergers had not been
contemplated by Medco. Medco is electing to provide the summary
unaudited prospective financial information in this section of
the joint proxy statement/prospectus to provide the stockholders
of Medco and Express Scripts access to certain non-public
unaudited prospective financial information that was made
available to the Medco board and the Express Scripts board for
purposes of considering and evaluating the mergers. The
unaudited prospective financial information was also provided to
the financial advisors of each of Medco and Express Scripts.
(See also the sections entitled The Mergers
Opinions of Financial Advisors to Medco and The
Mergers Opinions of Financial Advisors to Express
Scripts beginning on page 109). The unaudited
prospective financial information was not prepared with a view
toward public disclosure and the inclusion of summary unaudited
prospective financial information below should not be regarded
as an indication that any of Medco, Express Scripts or any other
recipient of this information considered, or now considers, it
to be necessarily predictive of actual future results. None of
Medco, Express Scripts, New Express Scripts or their respective
affiliates assumes any responsibility to stockholders for the
accuracy of this information.
The Medco unaudited prospective financial information was, in
general, prepared solely for internal use and is subjective in
many respects and thus subject to interpretation. While
presented with numeric specificity, the unaudited prospective
financial information reflects numerous estimates and
assumptions made by the management of Medco with respect to
industry performance and competition, general business,
economic, market and financial conditions and matters specific
to Medcos business, all of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond Medcos control. As a result,
there can be no assurance that the unaudited prospective
financial information will be realized or that actual results
will not be significantly higher or lower than estimated. Since
the unaudited prospective financial information covers multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less predictive
with each successive year. Stockholders are urged to review
Medcos most recent SEC filings for a description of risk
factors with respect to Medcos business. See also
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page 63 and Where You
Can Find More Information beginning on page 208 and
Risk Factors beginning on page 37. The
unaudited prospective financial information was not prepared
with a view toward complying with U.S. GAAP, the published
guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective
financial information.
The Medco prospective financial information included in this
section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus has been
prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Medcos
management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has neither examined,
compiled nor performed any procedures with respect to the
accompanying prospective financial information and, accordingly,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any
other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reports incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus relate to Medcos and
Express Scripts respective historical financial
information. They do not extend to the unaudited prospective
financial information and should not be read to do so.
The Medco management forecasts were prepared based on Medco as a
stand alone company. Such forecasts do not take into account the
mergers, including the impact of negotiating or executing the
transaction, the expenses that may be incurred in connection
with consummating the mergers, the potential synergies that may
be achieved by the combined company as a result of the mergers,
the effect of any business or strategic decision or action that
has been or will be taken as a result of the merger agreement
having been executed, or the effect of any business or strategic
decisions or actions which would likely have been taken if the
merger agreement had not been executed but which were instead
altered, accelerated, postponed or not taken in anticipation of
the mergers.
125
The following table presents summary selected unaudited Medco
prospective financial information for the fiscal years ending
2011 through 2014 prepared by Medco management in connection
with its evaluation of the mergers along with actual financial
results for 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medco Management Forecasts (Stand-Alone, Pre-Merger Basis)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
$
|
65,968.3
|
|
|
$
|
68,951.4
|
|
|
$
|
58,931.4
|
|
|
$
|
56,901.2
|
|
|
$
|
56,607.6
|
|
EBITDA(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
2,974.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,112.8
|
|
|
$
|
3,408.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,492.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,967.7
|
|
Net Income(1)
|
|
$
|
1,427.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,473.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,626.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,654.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,944.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts presented in the table above for 2011 represent a
forecast for operating results, and do not include any
merger-related expenses or other potential one-time costs of a
non-operating nature. The amounts presented in the table above
for 2012 through 2014 are tantamount to Medcos internal
operating plan, and also exclude any merger-related or other
one-time costs. Additionally, for 2012 through 2014, the amounts
presented in the table above should be viewed as the high end of
a performance range that Medco would normally use in providing
guidance to investors. |
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of the table above, EBITDA means
earnings before taxes, depreciation and amortization, net
interest and other income (expense); or alternatively calculated
as operating income plus depreciation and amortization. |
No assurances can be given that these assumptions will
accurately reflect future conditions. In addition, although
presented with numerical specificity, the above unaudited
prospective financial information reflects numerous assumptions
and estimates as to future events made by Medcos
management at the time the unaudited prospective financial
information was prepared. The above unaudited prospective
financial information does not give effect to the mergers.
Express Scripts stockholders and Medco stockholders are urged to
review Express Scripts and Medcos most recent SEC
filings for a description of the reported results of operations,
financial condition and capital resources during 2010 of each of
Express Scripts and Medco, respectively.
Readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned
not to rely on the unaudited prospective financial information
set forth above. No representation or warranty is or has been
made to stockholders by Medco, Express Scripts, New Express
Scripts or any person regarding the information included in the
unaudited prospective financial information described herein or
the ultimate performance of Medco, Express Scripts or New
Express Scripts compared to the information included in the
above prospective financial information. The inclusion of
unaudited prospective financial information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication
that such prospective financial information will be necessarily
predictive of actual future events nor construed as financial
guidance, and they should not be relied on as such.
MEDCO DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE
PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES
EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE
OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE
ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
Express
Scripts Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information
Express Scripts does not as a matter of course make public
long-term projections as to future revenues, earnings or other
results due to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the
underlying assumptions and estimates. However, in connection
with the review of the mergers, Express Scripts management
prepared unaudited prospective financial information. This
unaudited financial information included Revenue, EBITDA, Net
Income, EPS (each such term, as defined below) and cash flow
from operations for Express Scripts. This unaudited prospective
financial information was prepared in June 2011, in connection
with Express Scripts evaluation of the mergers, treating
Express Scripts on a stand-alone basis, without giving effect to
the mergers
126
and as if the mergers had not been contemplated by Express
Scripts, which information we refer to as the Express Scripts
management forecasts. Express Scripts is electing to provide
such information in this section of the joint proxy
statement/prospectus to the stockholders of Express Scripts and
Medco, because such forecasts were made available to the Express
Scripts board and the Medco board for purposes of considering
and evaluating the mergers. This unaudited prospective financial
information was also provided to the financial advisors of each
of Express Scripts and Medco. (See also the sections entitled
The Mergers Opinions of Financial Advisors to
Medco and The Mergers Opinions of
Financial Advisors to Express Scripts beginning on
pages 90 and 109, respectively). We refer to the Express
Scripts management forecasts, together with the certain
information set forth below regarding the original 2011 guidance
(as such term is defined below) and the revised 2011 guidance
(as such term is defined below), as the Express Scripts
unaudited prospective financial information. The Express Scripts
unaudited prospective financial information was not prepared
with a view toward public disclosure. The inclusion of the
Express Scripts unaudited prospective financial information
below should not be regarded as an indication that Express
Scripts, Medco or any other recipient of this information either
previously considered, or currently considers, such information
to be necessarily predictive of actual future results. None of
Express Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts or their respective
affiliates assumes any responsibility to stockholders for the
accuracy of this information.
The Express Scripts unaudited prospective financial information
is subjective in many respects and thus subject to
interpretation. While presented with numeric specificity, the
Express Scripts unaudited prospective financial information
reflects numerous estimates and assumptions made by the
management of Express Scripts with respect to industry
performance and competition, general business, economic, market
and financial conditions and matters specific to Express
Scripts business, all of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond Express Scripts or New
Express Scripts control. As a result, there can be no
assurance that the Express Scripts unaudited prospective
financial information will be realized or that actual results
will not be significantly higher or lower than estimated.
Portions of the Express Scripts unaudited prospective financial
information cover multiple years. Such information by its nature
becomes less predictive with each successive year. Express
Scripts stockholders and Medco stockholders are urged to review
Express Scripts and Medcos most recent SEC filings
for a description of risk factors with respect to Express
Scripts business and Medcos business, respectively,
and a description of the reported results of operations,
financial condition and capital resources during 2010 of each of
Express Scripts and Medco, respectively. See also
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page 63, Where You Can
Find More Information beginning on page 208 and
Risk Factors beginning on page 37. The Express
Scripts unaudited prospective financial information was not
prepared with a view toward complying with U.S. GAAP, the
published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the
guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of
prospective financial information.
The Express Scripts unaudited prospective financial information
included below has been prepared by, and is the responsibility
of, Express Scripts management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
has neither examined, compiled nor performed any procedures with
respect to the accompanying prospective financial information
and, accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an
opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reports incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus relate to Express
Scripts and Medcos respective historical financial
information. They do not extend to the Express Scripts unaudited
prospective financial information and should not be read to do
so.
The Express Scripts management forecasts were prepared based on
Express Scripts as a standalone company. Such forecasts do not
take into account the mergers, including the impact of
negotiating or executing the transaction, the expenses that may
be incurred in connection with consummating the mergers, the
potential synergies that may be achieved by the combined company
as a result of the mergers, the effect of any business or
strategic decision or action that has been or will be taken as a
result of the merger agreement having been executed, or the
effect of any business or strategic decisions or actions which
would likely have been taken if the merger agreement had not
been executed but which were instead altered, accelerated,
postponed or not taken in anticipation of the mergers. In
addition, though the Express Scripts management forecasts were
prepared with the assumption that Express Scripts contract
with Walgreens would continue in effect, Express
127
Scripts does not believe that the termination of that contract
would have a material impact on the forecasts set forth herein.
The following table presents summary selected unaudited
forecasts for the fiscal years ending 2011 through 2014 prepared
by Express Scripts management in June 2011 in connection
with its evaluation of the mergers along with actual financial
results for 2010. Additionally, certain prospective unaudited
financial information for the fiscal years ending 2015 and 2016
was extrapolated based on Express Scripts 2010 results and
management projections for the fiscal years ending 2011 through
2014 in June 2011 for use in connection with Express
Scripts financial advisors respective opinions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts Management Forecasts (Stand-Alone, Pre-Merger
Basis, Prepared in June 2011)
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Revenue(1)
|
|
$
|
45,057.2
|
|
|
$
|
45,477.4
|
|
|
$
|
46,546.2
|
|
|
$
|
48,132.7
|
|
|
$
|
51,227.7
|
|
Adj. EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
2,408.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,896.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,353.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,747.8
|
|
|
$
|
4,055.4
|
|
Adj. Net Income(1)
|
|
$
|
1,360.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,625.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,906.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,146.8
|
|
|
$
|
2,351.5
|
|
Cash Flow from Operations
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
2,250.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,375.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,515.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,650.0
|
|
EPS(2)
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
3.21
|
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
|
$
|
4.71
|
|
|
$
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We calculated Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Net Income, in each
case, as adjusted to exclude certain charges recorded each year,
such as integration related costs and amortization of intangible
assets, as these charges are not considered an indicator of
ongoing company performance. |
|
(2) |
|
EPS is adjusted earnings per share. |
In October 2011, Express Scripts, in connection with reviewing
the financial guidance initially provided in October 2010 for
the 2011 fiscal year (which was reaffirmed in July 2011), which
we refer to as the original 2011 guidance, we revisited certain
of the assumptions underlying the original 2011 guidance and the
Express Scripts management forecasts. Such assumptions
underlying the original 2011 guidance and the Express Scripts
management forecasts reflected the belief of Express
Scripts management that the previously anticipated
improvements in the U.S. economy would lead to improvements
in utilization and organic growth of claims during the second
half of 2011. In particular, the original 2011 guidance
contemplated that the annual aggregate growth in claims with
respect to fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010
resulting from utilization increases and organic growth would be
approximately 3.5%, offset by various factors, as compared to
general historical increases in utilization in the range of 3%
to 5% per year. In addition, in the original 2011 guidance,
total adjusted claims (as defined below) for 2011 were estimated
to be in the range of 750 to 780 million. The original 2011
guidance also contemplated that adjusted EBITDA per claim (as
defined below) would be in the range of $3.70 to $3.90. At
mid-year, while it was becoming more apparent that economic
conditions might not be improving as anticipated, Express
Scripts still believed that some level of improvement in the
economy, together with new client starts in the second half of
the year, would mitigate the impact of lower than expected
utilization and organic growth. Based on this and other key
factors Express Scripts provided its management forecasts to
Medco and its financial advisors, and was ultimately able to
reiterate its original 2011 guidance for EPS. Express Scripts
now believes that it is more likely than not that these
improvements in the economy, and thus the accompanying increase
in claims volume, will not materialize during 2011. In addition,
Express Scripts believes that due to a variety of factors,
including certain previously unanticipated expenses, such as
expenditures on projects which were accelerated in 2011 in order
to create capacity for integration projects related to the
mergers, investments to support clients and members as they
transfer away from Walgreens pharmacies, and increased
spending required in order to comply with new regulatory
guidance, as well as competitive pressures, growth in adjusted
EBITDA per claim will be less than originally anticipated for
2011.
As a result, Express Scripts now anticipates that total adjusted
claims for 2011 will likely be below the range of 750 to
780 million contemplated in the original 2011 guidance.
Additionally, Express Scripts now expects that fiscal year 2011
adjusted EBITDA per claim will be in a range of $3.55 and $3.70.
128
As a result of such review, on October 6, 2011, Express Scripts
announced revised guidance, which we refer to as the revised
2011 guidance, including that it expected its adjusted earnings
per share (as defined below) to be in a range of $2.95 to $3.05,
approximately 6% below the range of $3.15 to $3.25 provided in
the original 2011 guidance, and that it continued to expect that
its cash flow from operations will be in the range of $2.2 to
$2.4 billion, excluding and transaction related fees and
expenses incurred in connection with the mergers.
As a result of the foregoing change in assumptions, Express
Scripts now believes that the modifications made to the original
2011 guidance described above would reduce the amounts of
Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income and cash flow from
operations for 2011 as set forth in the Express Scripts
management forecasts prepared in June 2011 to ranges of $44 to
$48 billion, $2.6 to $2.8 billion, $1.4 to
$1.6 billion and $2.2 to $2.4 billion, respectively,
excluding transaction related fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the mergers where applicable.
Furthermore, to the extent that weakness in the
U.S. economy and overall competitive pressure persists,
Express Scripts expects that the trends described above will
have a continuing negative impact on Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA,
Net Income and cash flow from operations in 2012 and,
potentially, in subsequent fiscal years.
For the purposes of the above:
EBITDA means earnings before taxes,
depreciation and amortization, net interest and other income
(expense); or alternatively calculated as operating income plus
depreciation and amortization.
Adjusted earnings per share means earnings
per share, excluding: (i) amortization of legacy intangible
assets of approximately $0.04, (ii) amortization of
NextRx-related intangible assets of approximately $0.15,
(iii) non-recurring expenses related to the Medco
transaction and (iv) other non-recurring items.
Adjusted EBITDA per claim means adjusted
EBITDA per adjusted claim. Adjusted claims reflect
home delivery claims multiplied by three, as home delivery
claims typically cover a time period three times longer than
retail claims.
Adjusted Net Income means net income,
excluding: (i) amortization of legacy intangible assets of
approximately $34 million, (ii) amortization of
NextRx-related intangible assets of approximately
$120 million, (iii) non-recurring expenses related to
the Medco transaction and (iv) other non-recurring items.
Express Scripts calculated Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Net
Income, in each case, as adjusted to exclude certain charges
recorded each year, such as integration-related costs and
amortization of intangible assets, as these charges are not
considered an indicator of ongoing company performance.
Readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned
not to rely on the unaudited prospective financial information
set forth above. No representation or warranty is or has been
made to stockholders by Express Scripts, Medco, New Express
Scripts or any person regarding the information included in the
Express Scripts unaudited prospective financial information
described herein or the ultimate performance of Express Scripts,
Medco or New Express Scripts compared to the information
included in the above prospective financial information. The
inclusion of unaudited prospective financial information in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an
indication that such prospective financial information will be
necessarily predictive of actual future events nor construed as
financial guidance, and they should not be relied on as such.
NEITHER EXPRESS SCRIPTS NOR NEW EXPRESS SCRIPTS INTENDS TO
UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE EXPRESS SCRIPTS PROSPECTIVE
FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING AFTER
THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF FUTURE
EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE ASSUMPTIONS
UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION ARE NO LONGER
APPROPRIATE.
129
Medco
Adjusted Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information
Express Scripts does not as a matter of course make public
long-term projections as to future revenues, earnings or other
results which it may prepare in connection with Express
Scripts consideration of a potential business transaction
due to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, in connection with the
review of the mergers, Express Scripts management made certain
adjustments to the Medco management projected financial
information in 2014, which we refer to as the adjusted Medco
forecasts. Express Scripts is electing to provide such
information in this section of the joint proxy
statement/prospectus to the stockholders of Express Scripts and
Medco because such forecasts were made available to the Express
Scripts board for purposes of considering and evaluating the
mergers. The adjusted Medco forecasts were also provided to the
financial advisors of Express Scripts. (See also the section
entitled The Mergers Opinions of Financial
Advisors to Express Scripts beginning on page 109.)
The adjusted Medco forecasts were not prepared with a view
toward public disclosure. The inclusion of the adjusted Medco
forecasts below should not be regarded as an indication that
Express Scripts, Medco or any other recipient of this
information either previously considered, or currently
considers, such information to be necessarily predictive of
actual future results. None of Express Scripts, Medco, New
Express Scripts or their respective affiliates assumes any
responsibility to stockholders for the accuracy of this
information.
The adjusted Medco forecasts are subjective in many respects and
thus subject to interpretation. The adjusted Medco forecasts
reflect numerous estimates and assumptions with respect to
industry performance and competition, general business,
economic, market and financial conditions and matters specific
to Medcos business, all of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond Express Scripts, Medcos
or New Express Scripts control. As a result, there can be
no assurance that the adjusted Medco forecasts will be realized
or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower
than estimated. Express Scripts stockholders and Medco
stockholders are urged to review Express Scripts and
Medcos most recent SEC filings for a description of risk
factors with respect to Express Scripts business and
Medcos business, respectively, and a description of the
reported results of operations, financial condition and capital
resources during 2010 of each of Express Scripts and Medco,
respectively. See also Cautionary Note Concerning
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 63,
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 208 and Risk Factors beginning on
page 37. The adjusted Medco forecasts were not prepared
with a view toward complying with U.S. GAAP, the published
guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective
financial information.
The adjusted Medco forecasts included below have been prepared
by, and are the responsibility of, Express Scripts
management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has neither examined,
compiled nor performed any procedures with respect to the
accompanying prospective financial information and, accordingly,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any
other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP reports incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus relate to Express
Scripts and Medcos respective historical financial
information. They do not extend to the adjusted Medco forecasts
and should not be read to do so.
The adjusted Medco forecasts were prepared based on Medco as a
standalone company. Such forecasts do not take into account the
mergers, including the impact of negotiating or executing the
transaction, the expenses that may be incurred in connection
with consummating the mergers, the potential synergies that may
be achieved by the combined company as a result of the mergers,
the effect of any business or strategic decision or action that
has been or will be taken as a result of the merger agreement
having been executed, or the effect of any business or strategic
decisions or actions which would likely have been taken if the
merger agreement had not been executed but which were instead
altered, accelerated, postponed or not taken in anticipation of
the mergers.
Express Scripts management made certain adjustments to the
Medco management projected financial information in 2014 due to
a variety of factors. The adjustments reduced Medcos
estimated EBITDA by approximately $400 million in the
aggregate for 2014. Differences in key assumptions that led to
these adjustments include an expectation by Express Scripts
management that prescription volume will be lower than
130
that projected by Medco, margin expansion will be less than
expected by Medco and certain dis-economies of scale due to
lower prescription volume will be experienced by Medco in 2014.
In aggregate, these differences in assumptions reduce
Medcos projected EBITDA in 2014 by approximately 10%.
Express Scripts management did not consult Medco management in
making such adjustments.
Readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned
not to rely on the adjusted Medco forecasts described above. No
representation or warranty is or has been made to stockholders
by Express Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts or any person
regarding the information included in the Medco adjusted
forecasts described herein or the ultimate performance of Medco,
Express Scripts or New Express Scripts compared to the
information included in the above prospective financial
information. The inclusion of the adjusted Medco forecasts in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded as
an indication that such prospective financial information will
be necessarily predictive of actual future events nor construed
as financial guidance, and they should not be relied on as such.
NEITHER EXPRESS SCRIPTS NOR NEW EXPRESS SCRIPTS INTENDS TO
UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ADJUSTED MEDCO
FORECASTS TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN
MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE
EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH
PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE.
Interests
of Officers and Directors in the Mergers
Interests
of Medco Executive Officers and Directors in the
Mergers
In considering the recommendation of the Medco board that you
vote to adopt the merger agreement, you should be aware that
Medcos executive officers and directors have interests in
the Medco merger that are different from, or in addition to, the
interests of Medcos stockholders generally. The Medco
board was aware of these potentially differing interests and
considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision
to adopt the merger agreement and approve the Medco merger and
to recommend that you vote in favor of adopting the merger
agreement.
Stock
Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
Upon the completion of the Medco merger, (a) each
outstanding option to purchase Medco common stock will be
converted into an equivalent option to purchase Express Scripts
common stock on the same terms and conditions applicable to the
corresponding Medco stock option immediately before the Medco
merger, (b) each restricted stock unit award to acquire
Medco common stock, which we refer to as a RSU, will be
converted into an equivalent restricted stock unit award to
acquire New Express Scripts common stock on the same terms and
conditions applicable to the corresponding RSU immediately
before the Medco merger and (c) each deferred restricted
stock unit award to acquire Medco common stock, which we refer
to as a DSU, will be converted into an equivalent deferred
restricted stock unit award to acquire Express Scripts common
stock on the same terms and conditions applicable to the
corresponding DSU immediately before the Medco merger. As
described further in the section titled The Merger
Agreement Treatment of Medco Stock Options and Other
Stock-Based Awards beginning at page 155, the
outstanding options, RSUs and DSUs will be converted into New
Express Scripts awards based on the stock award exchange
ratio, which is equal to the sum of (i) 0.81 and
(ii) the quotient obtained by dividing (1) $28.80 (the
cash component of the Medco merger consideration) by (2) an
amount equal to the average of the closing prices of Express
Scripts common stock on the NASDAQ for each of the 15
consecutive trading days ending with the fourth complete trading
day prior to the completion of the Medco merger.
Pursuant to the terms of the equity compensation awards, if
within two years following the completion of the Medco merger,
an executives employment is involuntarily terminated by
Medco or Express Scripts for any reason other than for
cause (as defined in the Medco 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan) or by the executive officer for good reason
(as defined in Mr. Snows employment agreement or the
CIC Severance Plan (as defined below)), then all of such
executive officers outstanding equity awards which have
not vested will immediately
131
vest and become exercisable (if applicable) with the full
remaining term to exercise and all restrictions on such equity
awards will immediately lapse.
Based upon equity compensation holdings as of October 31,
2011, the number of unvested stock options to purchase Medco
common stock held by the executive officers and the non-employee
directors are as follows: Mr. Snow, 1,164,269, with a
weighted-average exercise price of $59.05; Mr. Klepper,
322,859, with a weighted-average exercise price of $59.15;
Mr. Rubino, 220,215, with a weighted-average exercise price
of $59.69; Mr. Moriarty, 209,539, with a weighted-average
exercise price of $59.29; Mr. Wentworth, 193,852, with a
weighted-average exercise price of $58.63; the 11 other
executive officers (as a group), 1,170,451, with a
weighted-average exercise price of $58.88; and the eight
non-employee directors (as a group), 52,800, with a
weighted-average exercise price of $63.41.
Based upon equity compensation holdings as of October 31,
2011, the number of unvested RSUs to acquire Medco common stock
held by the executive officers and the non-employee directors
are as follows: Mr. Snow, 121,270; Mr. Klepper,
71,645; Mr. Rubino, 47,450; Mr. Moriarty, 46,655;
Mr. Wentworth, 45,105; the 11 other executive officers (as
a group), 333,365; and the eight non-employee directors (as a
group), 8,000.
Certain of Medcos executive officers and directors hold
deferred DSUs, which, pursuant to previously entered deferral
elections, will pay-out upon or following the completion of the
Medco merger. Based upon equity compensation holdings as of
October 31, 2011, the number of DSUs held by the executive
officers and the non-employee directors that would pay out upon
or following the completion of the Medco merger are as follows:
Mr. Snow, 102,044; Mr. Klepper, 50,000;
Mr. Rubino, 0; Mr. Moriarty, 7,988;
Mr. Wentworth, 35,400; the 11 other executive officers (as
a group), 125,648; and the eight non-employee directors (as a
group), 151,700.
Employment
Agreement with David B. Snow, Jr.
Medco previously entered into an employment agreement with its
chief executive officer, David B. Snow, Jr. The employment
agreement provides Mr. Snow with certain severance
protections in the event of a termination of employment in
connection with a change in control of Medco, which includes
completion of the Medco merger.
If Mr. Snows employment is terminated by Medco or New
Express Scripts without cause or if he terminates
his employment for good reason, in either case
within one year after the completion of the Medco merger
(referred to herein as a qualifying termination),
Mr. Snow is entitled to receive a lump sum cash severance
payment equal to three times the sum of (x) his current
base salary and (y) the last annual bonus he received prior
to such termination. Additionally, in the event of such a
termination, Medco or New Express Scripts would be obligated to
provide Mr. Snow (and his spouse and eligible dependents)
with 12 months of COBRA continuation coverage paid by Medco
or New Express Scripts. Payment of the cash severance and other
benefits upon such a qualifying termination is conditioned upon
Mr. Snow executing a general release of claims in favor of
Medco and complying with ongoing confidentiality covenants, as
well as non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that
apply for a period of two years after Mr. Snows
employment terminates.
Cause is defined in Mr. Snows employment
agreement and is generally limited to acts of personal
dishonesty or misrepresentation, willful and deliberate
violations of obligations under the employment agreement, gross
neglect or gross misconduct in carrying out duties or resulting
in material economic harm to Medco, or the conviction of, or
plea of nolo contendere by, Mr. Snow to a felony.
Good Reason is defined in the employment agreement
and generally arises if Medco or New Express Scripts takes any
action that results in a substantial and material diminution in
Mr. Snows compensation, position, authority, duties
or responsibilities, or relocates Mr. Snow without his
consent.
Mr. Snows employment agreement further provides that
if the payments and benefits provided to Mr. Snow under his
employment agreement, or any other plan or agreement would
constitute an excess parachute payment for purposes
of Section 280G of the Code, then Mr. Snow will have
his payments and benefits reduced to the highest amount that
could be paid without triggering Section 280G of the Code,
if such a reduction would result in Mr. Snow receiving a
greater benefit on an after-tax basis.
132
Based on Mr. Snows compensation levels as of
October 31, 2011, the amount of cash severance that would
be payable to Mr. Snow upon a qualifying termination is
approximately $12,600,000 and the estimated value of the COBRA
continuation benefits paid by Medco or New Express Scripts that
he would receive is $21,671.
Change in
Control Executive Severance Plan
Each of Messrs. Klepper, Rubino, Moriarty, Wentworth and
the other executive officers (other than Mr. Snow) is a
participant in the 2006 Change in Control Executive Severance
Plan, which we refer to as the CIC Severance Plan. The CIC
Severance Plan provides for certain severance protections if the
executive is terminated by Medco or Express Scripts without
cause or if the executive terminates his or her
employment for good reason, in either case within
two years following the completion of the Medco merger, referred
to herein as a qualifying termination. In the event
of a qualifying termination, each executive is entitled to
receive cash severance equal to the sum of (1) two times
the sum of (x) his or her current base salary and
(y) the last annual bonus he or she received prior to such
termination and (2) a pro-rated bonus for the year of the
executives termination of employment, paid in installments
in accordance with Medcos normal payroll practices.
Additionally, in the event of a qualifying termination, each
executive (and his or her spouse and eligible dependents) shall
be provided up to 12 months of active health and welfare
benefit continuation, at a cost applicable to similarly situated
active Medco employees. Payment of the cash severance and other
benefits upon an executives qualifying termination is
conditioned upon the executive executing a general release of
claims in favor of Medco and complying with non-competition and
non-solicitation provisions that apply for a period of two years
after the executives employment terminates.
Cause is defined in the CIC Severance Plan and is
generally limited to acts of willful misconduct or willful
failure to perform duties, gross negligence, or conviction of,
or entering a plea to, a felony or crime involving dishonesty.
Good Reason is also defined in the CIC Severance
Plan and generally covers situations in which the
executives duties, responsibilities or pay opportunity has
been significantly reduced, or where Medco or Express Scripts
relocates the executive without his or her consent.
The CIC Severance Plan further provides that if the payments and
benefits provided to an executive under the CIC Severance Plan
or any other plan or agreement would constitute an excess
parachute payment for purposes of Section 280G of the
Code, the executive shall have his or her payments and benefits
reduced to the highest amount that could be paid without
triggering Section 280G of the Code.
Based on the executives compensation levels as of
October 31, 2011, the amount of cash severance that would
be payable upon a qualifying termination are as follows:
Mr. Klepper, $5,642,867 (plus an estimated $12,704 of
benefits continuation); Mr. Rubino, $3,658,067 (plus an
estimated $17,337 of benefits continuation); Mr. Moriarty,
$3,217,333 (plus an estimated $16,781 of benefits continuation);
Mr. Wentworth, $2,795,633 (plus an estimated $14,388 of
benefits continuation); and the 11 other executive officers (as
a group), $23,219,633 (plus an estimated $166,017 of benefits
continuation).
Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors
Medco sponsors a deferred compensation plan to provide
non-employee directors with an opportunity to defer receipt of
their cash compensation. Only one director, Dr. Wilson, has
deferred director fees under this plan. Upon completion of the
Medco merger, each director who is a participant in the deferred
compensation plan will receive, within 90 days following
the Medco merger, a single lump sum cash payment equal to the
unpaid balance of his or her deferral account under the plan,
valued as of the last day of the month in which the Medco merger
is completed. As of October 31, 2011, Dr. Wilson would
have received an aggregate lump sum cash payment of $91,296.87
in respect of her deferred cash compensation under the deferred
compensation plan for non-employee directors.
133
Compensation
Actions between Signing of Merger Agreement and Completion of
Merger
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Medco may take certain
compensation actions prior to the completion of the Medco merger
that will affect its executive officers and directors. Medco may
make stock option and RSU grants to its executive officers and
directors in respect of 2011 performance. Medco may also pay out
bonus amounts for 2011 performance, based on maximum funding.
Further, if the Medco merger completion date occurs in 2012,
Medco may pay a pro rata portion of bonus amounts for 2012 on
the Medco merger completion date. Medco may also grant regularly
scheduled merit-based pay increases in respect of 2011
performance.
Continuing
Services as Director for New Express Scripts Board
The New Express Scripts board after the mergers will include two
individuals who, as of immediately prior to the closing of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, serve as
independent directors of Medco. The two individuals who are then
independent directors of Medco will be designated as New Express
Scripts board members by Express Scripts before consummation of
the mergers. It is currently expected that the compensation to
be paid to directors of New Express Scripts will be
substantially similar to the compensation paid to Express
Scripts directors immediately prior to the effective time of the
Express Scripts merger. For a discussion of the New Express
Scripts board, see The Mergers New Express
Scripts Board of Directors and Management after the
Mergers.
Indemnification
and Insurance
Under the terms of the merger agreement, New Express Scripts
agreed that it will, following the effective times of the
mergers, indemnify, defend, hold harmless and advance expenses
to the present and former directors of Medco, as well as the
employees of Medco who are fiduciaries of Medcos benefits
plans, against any costs, expenses, losses or liabilities
arising out of matters existing or occurring at or prior to the
effective times of the mergers, including the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement. Additionally, prior to the
effective time of the Medco merger, Medco may purchase
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary liability insurance with a claims period of no more
than six years from and after the effective time of the Medco
merger and benefits and levels of coverage not materially more
favorable than Medcos existing policies for matters
existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the
Medco merger; provided, that the cost of such policies may not
exceed a specified amount. If such policies are obtained, New
Express Scripts will, and will cause Medco after the Medco
merger to, maintain such policies. If such policies have not
been obtained as of the effective time of the Medco merger, New
Express Scripts will, and will cause the Medco surviving
corporation to, maintain, for six years after the effective
times of the mergers, directors and officers
liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance that is
not materially less favorable to the current and former
directors and officers of Medco than Medcos existing
policy. For a discussion of these interests, see The
Merger Agreement Indemnification and Insurance.
Interests
of Express Scripts Directors and Executive Officers in the
Mergers
In considering the recommendation of the Express Scripts board
with respect to the proposal to adopt the merger agreement,
Express Scripts stockholders should be aware that executive
officers and directors of Express Scripts have certain interests
in the mergers that may be different from, or in addition to,
the interests of Express Scripts stockholders generally. These
interests include the following:
Continuing
Services as Director for New Express Scripts Board
The New Express Scripts board after the mergers will include
each of the directors from the current Express Scripts board.
The Express Scripts board presently consists of eleven
directors, including Express Scripts Chief Executive
Officer. It is currently expected that the compensation to be
paid to outside directors of New Express Scripts will be
substantially similar to the compensation paid to Express
Scripts directors immediately prior to the effective time of the
Express Scripts merger. For a discussion of the New Express
134
Scripts board, see The Mergers New Express
Scripts Board of Directors and Management after the
Mergers.
Stock
Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
Under the Express Scripts long-term incentive plans, the mergers
will not constitute a change in control for Express
Scripts. Therefore, the outstanding Express Scripts stock
options, restricted stock awards and performance share awards do
not become exercisable
and/or the
vesting restrictions do not lapse by virtue of the Express
Scripts merger. The outstanding Express Scripts stock options,
restricted stock awards and performance share awards will
generally be converted from a right to acquire Express Scripts
common stock into a right to acquire New Express Scripts common
stock, on substantially the same terms and conditions (including
vesting schedule and per share exercise price) as applied to
such Express Scripts award immediately prior to the effective
time of the Express Scripts merger. For a discussion of the
conversion of the awards, see The Merger
Agreement Treatment of Express Scripts Stock Options
and Other Stock-Based Awards.
Continuing
Employment with New Express Scripts
Under the merger agreement, upon completion of the mergers, the
officers of Express Scripts immediately before the effective
time of the Express Scripts merger will be the officers of New
Express Scripts. It is currently expected that the executive
officers of Express Scripts will continue their employment with
New Express Scripts following the effective time of the Express
Scripts merger on substantially similar terms and conditions as
those terms and conditions in existence immediately prior to the
effective time of the Express Scripts merger.
Indemnification
and Insurance
Under the merger agreement, New Express Scripts has agreed,
following the effective times of the mergers, to indemnify and
exculpate (and advance expenses to), each present and former
director and officer of Express Scripts and its subsidiaries and
each of their employees who serves as a fiduciary of an Express
Scripts benefit plan against any costs or expenses arising out
of matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective
times of the mergers, including the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement. New Express Scripts has also agreed to
continue all rights to exculpation or indemnification provided
for in the organizational documents of Express Scripts in favor
of the current or former directors or officers of Express
Scripts. Further, New Express Scripts has agreed, subject to
certain limitations, to cause the surviving corporations in the
Express Scripts merger and Medco merger to maintain, for six
years after the effective times of the mergers, directors
and officers liability insurance and fiduciary liability
insurance that is not materially less favorable to the current
and former directors and officers than such partys
existing policy. For a discussion of these interests, see
The Merger Agreement Indemnification and
Insurance.
New
Express Scripts Board of Directors and Management after
the Mergers
Board
of Directors
Under the merger agreement, upon completion of the mergers, the
New Express Scripts board will be comprised of all of the
individuals who are directors of Express Scripts immediately
prior to closing the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and two individuals who are then independent directors
of Medco. The two individuals who are then independent directors
of Medco will be designated by Express Scripts before
consummation of the mergers. As of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, no determination has been made as to the
identity of the two Medco directors who will be appointed to the
New Express Scripts board.
The Express Scripts board presently consists of eleven members.
Following consummation of the mergers, the current Express
Scripts directors will constitute eleven of thirteen members of
the New Express Scripts board. Assuming that the mergers are
consummated prior to New Express Scripts 2012 annual
stockholders meeting, the initial term of these directors will
end with New Express Scripts annual stockholders meeting
in 2012. Thereafter, the directors will serve for one-year terms.
135
New Express Scripts directors that have been designated as of
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and their ages
as of September 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Director and
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Designee of:
|
|
Gary G. Benanav
|
|
65
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Maura C. Breen
|
|
55
|
|
Express Scripts
|
William J. DeLaney
|
|
55
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Nicholas J. LaHowchic
|
|
64
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Thomas P. Mac Mahon
|
|
64
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Frank Mergenthaler
|
|
50
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Woodrow A. Myers Jr., M.D.
|
|
57
|
|
Express Scripts
|
John O. Parker, Jr.
|
|
67
|
|
Express Scripts
|
George Paz, Chairman
|
|
56
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Samuel K. Skinner
|
|
73
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Seymour Sternberg
|
|
68
|
|
Express Scripts
|
Biographical information for the current directors of Express
Scripts (other than Mr. DeLaney) is contained in Express
Scripts proxy statement for its 2011 annual meeting of
stockholders and is incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Biographical information for
Mr. DeLaney is set forth below.
William J. DeLaney, 55, was elected a director of Express
Scripts in September 2011. He has been a director of Sysco since
January 2009 and began serving as Syscos Chief Executive
Officer in March 2009. Mr. DeLaney joined Sysco Food
Services of Syracuse in 1996 and was promoted to the role of
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective
July 1, 2007.
Relevant Areas of Expertise, Experience and Qualifications:
Mr. DeLaney earned a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from the University of Notre Dame, and a Master of
Business Administration degree from the Wharton Graduate
Division of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. DeLaney
brings experience to our board in the areas of leadership and
management development, corporate strategy and development,
finance and accounting and distribution and supply chain
management.
Committees
of the New Express Scripts Board of Directors
Upon completion of the mergers, it is expected that the New
Express Scripts board will have the following four committees:
Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Compliance Committee
and Corporate Governance Committee. Each committee will be
composed entirely of directors deemed to be, in the judgment of
the Express Scripts board, independent in accordance with
listing standards of The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the
directors of Express Scripts serve on the committees specified
in the table below. It is expected that, following consummation
of the mergers, the directors of New Express Scripts will serve
on the same committees that they served on as directors of
Express Scripts immediately prior to the effective time of the
Express Scripts merger.
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Gary G. Benanav
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Maura C. Breen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. DeLaney
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas J. LaHowchic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Mac Mahon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Frank Mergenthaler
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodrow A. Myers Jr., M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
John O. Parker, Jr.
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George Paz, Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel K. Skinner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seymour Sternberg
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Management
Under the merger agreement, upon completion of the mergers, the
officers of Express Scripts immediately before the effective
time of the Express Scripts merger will be the officers of New
Express Scripts. Members of New Express Scripts senior
management that have been designated as of the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and their ages as of
September 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
George Paz
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
|
Jeffrey Hall
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Patrick McNamee
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
|
Ed Ignaczak
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing
|
Keith Ebling
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Information on the members of the senior management team of New
Express Scripts who will also serve as directors of New Express
Scripts is provided above under Board of
Directors.
Compensation
of Directors and Other Management
New Express Scripts has not yet paid any compensation to its
directors, executive officers or other managers. It is currently
expected that the compensation to be paid to directors,
executive officers or other managers of New Express Scripts will
be substantially similar to the compensation paid to Express
Scripts directors, executive officers or other managers
immediately prior to the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger.
Information concerning the compensation paid to, and the
employment agreements with, the Chief Executive Officer and the
other four most highly compensated executive officers of Express
Scripts for the 2010 fiscal year is contained in Express
Scripts proxy statement for its 2011 annual meeting of
stockholders and is incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Information concerning the
compensation paid to, and the employment agreements with, the
Chief Executive Officer and the other four most highly
compensated executive officers of Medco for the 2010 fiscal year
is contained in Medcos proxy statement for its 2011 annual
meeting of stockholders and is incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Conversion
of Shares; Exchange of Certificates; No Fractional
Shares
Conversion
and Exchange of Medco Common Stock
The conversion of shares of Medco common stock, other than the
Medco excluded shares, into (i) the right to receive $28.80
in cash, without interest and (ii) 0.81 shares of
validly issued, fully paid and
137
non-assessable
New Express Scripts common stock will occur automatically at the
effective time of the Medco merger. As soon as reasonably
practicable after the effective time of the Medco merger, New
Express Scripts exchange agent will mail to each holder of
record of a certificate whose shares of Medco common stock were
converted into the right to receive the Medco merger
consideration, a letter of transmittal. The letter of
transmittal will specify that delivery shall be effected, and
risk of loss and title to the certificates will pass, only upon
delivery of the certificates to the exchange agent. The letter
of transmittal will be accompanied by instructions for
surrendering the certificates in exchange for the Medco merger
consideration, including New Express Scripts common stock (which
will be issued in non-certificated book entry form unless a
physical certificate is requested), the cash portion of the
Medco merger consideration, any dividends or distributions
payable pursuant to the merger agreement and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares of New Express Scripts common stock. No
interest will be paid or will accrue on any cash payable upon
surrender of a certificate. Medco stockholders should not
return stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card.
After the effective time of the Medco merger, shares of Medco
common stock will no longer be outstanding and cease to exist,
until surrendered, and each certificate that previously
represented shares of Medco common stock will represent only the
right to receive the Medco merger consideration as described
above.
Until holders of certificates previously representing Medco
common stock have surrendered their certificates to the exchange
agent for exchange, those holders will not receive dividends or
distributions, if any, on the shares of New Express Scripts
common stock into which those shares have been converted with a
record date after the effective time of the Medco merger.
Subject to applicable law, when holders surrender their
certificates, they will receive any dividends on shares of New
Express Scripts common stock with a record date after the
effective time of the Medco merger and a payment date on or
prior to the date of surrender, without interest.
Any holder of book entry shares of Medco common stock will not
be required to deliver a certificate or an executed letter of
transmittal to the exchange agent to receive the Medco merger
consideration that such holder is entitled to receive pursuant
to the merger agreement.
In lieu thereof, each holder of record of one or more book entry
shares whose shares of Medco common stock will be converted into
the right to receive the Medco merger consideration shall
automatically, upon the effective time of the Medco merger (or,
at any later time at which such book entry share shall be so
converted), be entitled to receive, and New Express Scripts
shall cause the exchange agent to pay and deliver as promptly as
practicable after the effective time of the Medco merger, the
Medco merger consideration, including New Express Scripts common
stock (which will be issued in non-certificated book entry form
unless a physical certificate is requested), the cash portion of
the Medco merger consideration, any dividends or distributions
payable pursuant to the merger agreement and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares of New Express Scripts common stock. The book
entry shares of Medco common stock held by such holder will be
canceled.
Medco stockholders will not receive any fractional shares of New
Express Scripts common stock pursuant to the Medco merger.
Instead of receiving any fractional shares, each holder of Medco
common stock will be paid an amount in cash, without interest,
rounded down to the nearest cent, equal to the product of
(i) the amount of the fractional share interest in a share
of New Express Scripts common stock to which such holder would
otherwise be entitled (rounded to three decimal places) and
(ii) an amount equal to the average of the closing sale
prices of Express Scripts common stock on the NASDAQ for each of
the 15 consecutive trading days ending with the fourth complete
trading day prior to the closing date.
New Express Scripts will be entitled to deduct and withhold from
the Medco merger consideration otherwise payable to any holder
of Medco common stock any amounts required to be deducted and
withheld under the Code, or under any provision of state, local
or foreign tax law.
138
Conversion
of Express Scripts Common Stock
The conversion of shares of Express Scripts common stock into
shares of New Express Scripts common stock will occur
automatically at the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger. All of the shares of Express Scripts common stock
converted into New Express Scripts common stock pursuant to the
Express Scripts merger will cease to be outstanding and will
cease to exist. As of the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger, holders of Express Scripts common stock will be deemed
to have received shares of New Express Scripts common stock
(without the requirement to surrender any certificate previously
representing shares of Express Scripts common stock or issuance
of new certificates representing New Express Scripts common
stock). Each certificate representing shares of Express Scripts
common stock prior to the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger will be deemed to automatically represent an equivalent
number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock.
Governmental
and Regulatory Approvals
Each of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and Medco has
agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain (and to
cooperate with the other party to obtain) any consent,
authorization, order or approval of, or any exemption by, any
governmental entity and any other third party which is required
in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, and to comply with the terms and conditions of any
such consent, authorization, order or approval. These approvals
include approval under, or notices pursuant to, the HSR Act and,
until the fifth business day prior to the outside date, without
giving effect to any extension thereof, certain approvals from,
and making filings with, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services and certain state insurance departments
relating to Express Scripts and Medcos insurance
company subsidiaries. Subject to the terms and conditions of the
merger agreement, Express Scripts and Medco have also agreed
(i) to use reasonable best efforts to supply any additional
information that may be requested pursuant to the HSR Act as
promptly as practicable and to take all other actions consistent
with their obligations to use reasonable best efforts to obtain
governmental approvals necessary to cause the expiration or
termination of the applicable waiting periods (and any
extensions thereof) under the HSR Act and (ii) not to
acquire another business or effect any transaction that would
materially impair or delay the closing of the mergers beyond the
outside date (as it may be extended) or could increase the
likelihood of a failure to satisfy the condition that no order
prohibiting the mergers has been issued by a governmental entity
restraining or making illegal the consummation of the mergers or
the condition that the applicable antitrust waiting periods have
expired or have been terminated and the applicable governmental
approvals have been received.
Express Scripts and Medco have been making the necessary
notifications and filings with both state and federal
regulators, including the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services and certain state insurance departments, to
obtain the consents, authorizations and approvals contemplated
by the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the parties obligations summarized above,
Medco and Express Scripts have also agreed that in no event will
Express Scripts or New Express Scripts or their subsidiaries or
affiliates be required to (nor may Medco and its subsidiaries be
permitted to agree (unless directed by Express Scripts) to)
(i) divest, license, hold separate or otherwise dispose of,
or allow a third party to utilize, any portion of its or their
respective businesses, assets or contracts or (ii) take any
other action that may be required or requested by any
governmental entity in connection with obtaining the consents,
authorizations, orders or approvals contemplated by the merger
agreement that would have an adverse impact, in any material
respect, on the business of Express Scripts, New Express
Scripts, Medco or their respective subsidiaries. However,
Express Scripts has agreed, conditioned on the closing, to the
extent necessary to ensure satisfaction, on or prior to the
outside date (as it may be extended), of certain conditions to
the closing of the mergers relating to regulatory approvals to:
|
|
|
|
|
the divestiture or disposition of one mail order dispensing
facility of Express Scripts, Medco or any of their respective
subsidiaries (provided that it is not the Express Scripts
facility located in St. Louis, Missouri);
|
|
|
|
the divestiture or disposition of the property, plant and
equipment associated with specialty pharmacy dispensing or
infusion facilities of Express Scripts, Medco or any of their
respective subsidiaries having
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
a net book value not in excess of $30 million in the
aggregate (provided that it not include the property, plant or
equipment at the Express Scripts facility located in
Indianapolis, Indiana); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the divestiture, disposition, termination, expiration,
assignment, delegation, novation or other transfer of contracts
of Express Scripts, Medco or their respective subsidiaries which
generated, collectively, EBITDA not in excess of
$115 million during the most recently available 12 calendar
month period ending on the applicable date of such agreement;
provided, that in the case of pharmacy benefits management
customer contracts, the aggregate annual number of adjusted
prescription drug claims subject to the foregoing obligation
will not exceed 35 million.
|
While the parties have agreed, under certain circumstances, to
take the actions set forth in the paragraph above pursuant to
the merger agreement, the parties may also elect to take other
actions. Express Scripts, after prior consultation with Medco to
the extent practicable, shall have the principal responsibility
for devising and implementing the strategy for obtaining any
necessary antitrust or competition clearances, and shall take
the lead in all meetings and communications with any
governmental entity in connection with obtaining any necessary
antitrust or competition clearances. The parties have also
agreed that, as between Express Scripts and Medco, Express
Scripts will determine the manner in which any of the actions
specified in the three bullet points above will be implemented.
The parties have also agreed to use reasonable best efforts to
take all actions proper or advisable to consummate, as soon as
practicable after the date of the merger agreement, the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including
using reasonable best efforts to lift or rescind any injunction
or restraining order or other order adversely affecting the
ability of the parties to consummate such transactions and using
reasonable best efforts to defend any litigation seeking to
enjoin, prevent or delay the consummation of such transactions
or seeking material damages.
U.S.
Antitrust Filing
Under the HSR Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, certain transactions, including the Medco merger,
may not be consummated unless certain waiting period
requirements have expired or been terminated. The HSR Act
provides that each party must file a pre-merger notification
with the Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the FTC,
and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, which
we refer to as the DOJ. A transaction notifiable under the HSR
Act may not be completed until the expiration of a
30-calendar-day waiting period following the parties
filing of their respective HSR Act notification forms or the
early termination of that waiting period. If the DOJ or the FTC
issues a Request for Additional Information and Documentary
Material prior to the expiration of the initial waiting period,
the parties must observe a second
30-day
waiting period, which would begin to run only after both parties
have substantially complied with the request for additional
information, unless the waiting period is terminated earlier.
Express Scripts and Medco each filed its required HSR
notification and report forms with respect to the Medco merger
on August 3, 2011, commencing the initial 30-calendar-day
waiting period. On September 2, 2011, Express Scripts and
Medco each received a second request from the FTC in connection
with the FTCs review of the Medco merger. A second request
was anticipated by the parties at the time of signing of the
merger agreement. Issuance of the second request extends the
waiting period under the HSR Act until 30 days after both
parties have substantially complied with the requests, unless
the waiting period is terminated sooner by the FTC. Express
Scripts and Medco have been cooperating with the FTC staff since
shortly after the announcement of the mergers and intend to
continue to work cooperatively with the FTC staff in the review
of the Medco merger. Express Scripts and Medco intend to respond
to the second request as promptly as practicable.
At any time before or after the mergers are completed, either
the DOJ or the FTC could take action under the antitrust laws in
opposition to the mergers, including seeking to enjoin
completion of the mergers, condition completion of the mergers
upon the divestiture of assets of Express Scripts, Medco or
their subsidiaries or impose restrictions on New Express
Scripts post-merger operations. In addition,
U.S. state attorneys general could take action under the
antitrust laws as they deem necessary or desirable in the public
interest, including, without limitation, seeking to enjoin the
completion of the mergers or permitting
140
completion subject to regulatory concessions or conditions.
Private parties may also seek to take legal action under the
antitrust laws under some circumstances.
Other
Governmental Approvals
Express Scripts and Medco are not aware of any material
governmental approvals or actions that are required for
completion of the mergers other than those described in the
section entitled Governmental and Regulatory
Approvals. It is presently contemplated that if any such
additional governmental approvals or actions are required, those
approvals or actions will be sought. There can be no assurance,
however, that any additional approvals or actions will be
obtained.
Timing
Express Scripts and Medco cannot assure you that all of the
regulatory approvals described above will be obtained and, if
obtained, Express Scripts and Medco cannot assure you as to the
timing of any approvals, the ability to obtain the approvals on
satisfactory terms or the absence of any litigation challenging
such approvals. Express Scripts and Medco also cannot assure you
that the DOJ, the FTC or any state attorney general will not
attempt to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds, and, if
such a challenge is made, Express Scripts and Medco cannot
assure you as to its result.
Merger
Expenses, Fees and Costs
All fees and expenses incurred by Express Scripts and Medco in
connection with the merger agreement and the related
transactions will be paid by the party incurring those fees or
expenses, except that the parties agreed to share equally the
filing fees under the HSR Act and any fees for similar filings
under foreign laws, the expenses in connection with printing and
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and all SEC
filing fees paid or payable to the SEC relating to the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Under
specified circumstances, Express Scripts or Medco may be
required to pay a termination fee of $950 million,
$650 million or $227.5 million (depending on the
specific circumstances) if the merger is not consummated.
Express Scripts or Medco may also be required to reimburse the
other party for its expenses, up to a maximum amount of either
$225 million or $100 million (depending on the
specific circumstances), in connection with the termination of
the merger agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event
shall Express Scripts or Medco, as applicable, reimburse the
other partys expenses or pay the other party the full
amount of the termination fee more than once, nor shall either
party pay the other party an aggregate amount in excess of the
full amount of the termination fee pursuant to the expense
reimbursement and termination fee provisions of the merger
agreement. See The Merger Agreement
Termination Fees; Expenses beginning on page 178.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the mergers applicable to holders of
Express Scripts common stock and Medco common stock. This
discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury regulations,
judicial authorities, published positions of the Internal
Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, and other
applicable authorities, all as currently in effect and all of
which are subject to change or differing interpretations
(possibly with retroactive effect). This discussion is limited
to U.S. holders (as defined below) that hold their shares
of Express Scripts common stock or Medco common stock as capital
assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This
discussion does not address all of the tax consequences that may
be relevant to a particular stockholder or to stockholders that
are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income
tax laws, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
stockholders that are not U.S. holders;
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark to market method
of accounting;
|
|
|
|
persons who own more than 5% of the outstanding stock of Express
Scripts or Medco;
|
|
|
|
persons that hold Express Scripts common stock or Medco common
stock as part of a straddle, hedge, constructive sale or
conversion transaction; and
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders who acquired their shares of Express Scripts
common stock or Medco common stock through the exercise of an
employee stock option or otherwise as compensation.
|
If a partnership or other entity taxed as a partnership holds
Express Scripts common stock or Medco common stock, the tax
treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partnerships and partners in such a partnership
should consult their tax advisors about the tax consequences of
the mergers to them.
This discussion does not address the tax consequences of the
mergers under state, local or foreign tax laws. No assurance can
be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would
not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences
set forth below.
All holders are urged to consult with their tax advisors as
to the tax consequences of the mergers in their particular
circumstances, including the applicability and effect of the
alternative minimum tax and any state, local, foreign or other
tax laws.
For purposes of this section, the term
U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of Express
Scripts common stock or Medco common stock, as applicable, that
for U.S. federal income tax purposes is:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States or any State or the
District of Columbia;
|
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its
income regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust, the substantial decisions of which are controlled by
one or more U.S. persons and which is subject to the
primary supervision of a U.S. court, or a trust that
validly has elected under applicable Treasury regulations to be
treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
|
Tax
Consequences of the Mergers Generally
Express Scripts and Medco intend that the Express Scripts merger
and the Medco merger, taken together, be treated as an exchange
described in Section 351 of the Code. It is a condition to
Medcos obligation to complete the Medco merger that Medco
receive a written opinion of its counsel, Sullivan &
Cromwell, to the effect that the Express Scripts merger and the
Medco merger, taken together, will qualify as an exchange
described in Section 351 of the Code. It is a condition to
Express Scripts obligation to complete the Express Scripts
merger that New Express Scripts receive an opinion of its
counsel, Skadden, to the effect that the Express Scripts merger
and the Medco merger, taken together, will qualify as an
exchange described in Section 351 of the Code. In rendering
these opinions, counsel will require and rely upon
representations contained in letters and certificates to be
received from Express Scripts and Medco. If the letters or
certificates are incorrect, the conclusions reached in the tax
opinions could be jeopardized. In addition, the opinions will be
subject to certain qualifications and limitations as set forth
in the opinions. Neither Express Scripts nor Medco intends to
waive this opinion condition to its obligation to consummate the
merger. If either Express Scripts or Medco waives this opinion
condition after the registration statement of which this proxy
statement/prospectus is a part is declared effective by the SEC,
and the change in tax consequences is material, Express Scripts
and Medco will recirculate an updated version of this proxy
statement/prospectus and resolicit proxies from their respective
stockholders.
142
None of the tax opinions given in connection with the mergers
will be binding on the IRS. Neither Express Scripts nor Medco
will request any ruling from the IRS as to the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the mergers. Consequently, no
assurance can be given that the IRS will not assert, or that a
court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of those set
forth below. In addition, if any of the representations or
assumptions upon which those opinions are based is inconsistent
with the actual facts, the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the mergers could be adversely affected.
Tax
Consequences to Medco Stockholders
Based upon the facts and representations contained in the
representation letters received from Express Scripts and Medco
described above under Tax Consequences of the Mergers
Generally, in the opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell, the
Express Scripts merger and the Medco merger, taken together,
will qualify as an exchange described in Section 351 of the
Code and as a result:
Subject to the discussion below regarding Section 304 of
the Code, a U.S. holder of Medco common stock generally
will recognize gain, but not loss, on the exchange of Medco
common stock for New Express Scripts common stock and cash
(excluding any cash received in lieu of fractional shares) equal
to the lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
the excess of (i) the sum of the fair market value of New
Express Scripts common stock received and the amount of cash
received in the Medco merger over (ii) the
U.S. holders tax basis in the Medco common stock
surrendered in the Medco merger, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash received by such U.S. holder in the
Medco merger.
|
For this purpose, a U.S. holder must calculate gain or loss
separately for each identifiable block of shares of Medco common
stock that is surrendered in the exchange, and the
U.S. holder may not offset a loss recognized on one block
of the shares against gain recognized on another block of the
shares. Subject to the discussion below regarding
Section 304 of the Code, any gain recognized by such
U.S. holder will generally be treated as capital gain and
will be long-term capital gain if the holding period for shares
of the Medco common stock that are surrendered in the exchange
is more than one year as of the effective time of the Medco
merger. The aggregate tax basis of the New Express Scripts
common stock received by a U.S. holder (including
fractional shares deemed received and redeemed as described
below) will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the shares
of Medco common stock surrendered in the exchange, decreased by
the amount of cash received, and increased by the amount of gain
recognized. A U.S. holders holding period for the New
Express Scripts common stock received in the Medco merger will
include the holding period of the shares of Medco common stock
surrendered in exchange therefor.
Cash received in lieu of fractional shares. A
U.S. holder that receives cash in lieu of a fractional
share of New Express Scripts common stock in the Medco merger
will generally be treated as having received such fractional
share and then as having received such cash in redemption of
such fractional share interest. A U.S. holder generally
will recognize gain or loss measured by the difference between
the amount of cash received and the portion of the basis of the
shares of New Express Scripts common stock allocable to such
fractional interest. Such gain or loss generally will constitute
capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss
if the U.S. holders holding period in the Express
Scripts common stock exchanged therefor was greater than one
year as of the date of the exchange.
Application of Section 304 of the
Code. The results to Medco stockholders described
above may be altered if Section 304 of the Code applies to
the Medco merger. Section 304 of the Code will apply to the
Medco merger if the Medco stockholders, in the aggregate, own
stock of New Express Scripts possessing 50% or more of the total
combined voting power or 50% or more of the total combined value
of all classes of stock of New Express Scripts, taking into
account certain constructive ownership rules under the Code and,
in the case of a Medco stockholder who also owns Express Scripts
common stock, taking into account any New Express Scripts common
stock received by such Medco stockholder in the Express Scripts
merger. If Section 304 of the Code were to apply to the
Medco merger, U.S. holders of Medco common stock who do not
actually or constructively own any shares of Express Scripts
common stock at the effective time of the
143
Medco merger will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and the portion
of such U.S. holders tax basis in its Medco common
stock that is exchanged for such cash. U.S. holders of
Medco common stock who actually or constructively own shares of
Express Scripts common stock should consult their own tax
advisors as to the amount and character of any income in the
event that Section 304 of the Code applies to the Medco
merger.
Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting. Payments of cash to a U.S. holder
of Medco common stock in the Medco merger may, under certain
circumstances, be subject to information reporting and backup
withholding, unless the holder provides proof of an applicable
exemption or furnishes its taxpayer identification number, and
otherwise complies with all applicable requirements of the
backup withholding rules. Any amounts withheld from payments to
a holder under the backup withholding rules are not additional
tax and will be allowed as a refund or credit against the
holders U.S. federal income tax liability, provided
the required information is furnished to the IRS.
Tax
Consequences to Express Scripts Stockholders
Based upon the facts and representations contained in the
representation letters received from Express Scripts and Medco
described above under Tax Consequences of the Mergers
Generally, in the opinion of Skadden, the Express Scripts
merger and the Medco merger, taken together, will qualify as an
exchange described in Section 351 of the Code and as a
result:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. holder of Express Scripts common stock will not
recognize gain or loss upon the exchange of its Express Scripts
common stock for New Express Scripts common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the aggregate tax basis of the New Express Scripts common stock
the U.S. holder of Express Scripts common stock receives
will be equal to the aggregate tax basis of the Express Scripts
common stock exchanged therefor, and the holding period of the
New Express Scripts common stock will include the
U.S. holders holding period of the Express Scripts
common stock surrendered in exchange therefor.
|
Reporting
Requirements
U.S. holders of Express Scripts common stock or Medco
common stock who receive New Express Scripts common stock and,
upon consummation of the mergers, own New Express Scripts common
stock representing at least 5% of the total combined voting
power or value of the total outstanding New Express Scripts
common stock, are required to attach to their tax returns for
the year in which the mergers are consummated, and maintain a
permanent record of, a complete statement of all the facts
relating to the exchange of stock in connection with the mergers
containing the information listed in Treasury regulations
section 1.351-3.
The facts to be disclosed by a U.S. holder include the
aggregate fair market value of, and the U.S. holders
basis in, the Express Scripts common stock or the Medco common
stock, as applicable, exchanged pursuant to the mergers.
Accounting
Treatment of the Mergers
The mergers of Medco by Express Scripts will be accounted for
using the acquisition method of accounting based on
authoritative guidance for business combinations under
U.S. GAAP. In determining the acquirer for accounting
purposes, Express Scripts considered the factors required under
U.S. GAAP. Express Scripts will be considered the acquirer
of Medco for accounting purposes. The total purchase price will
be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from
Medco based on their fair values as of the date of the
completion of the mergers and the excess, if any, being
allocated to specific identifiable intangibles acquired or
goodwill. Reported financial condition and results of operations
of Express Scripts issued after completion of the mergers will
reflect Medcos balances and results after completion of
the mergers, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect
the historical financial position or results of operations of
Medco. Following the completion of the mergers, the earnings of
the combined company will reflect acquisition accounting
adjustments, including increased amortization expense for
acquired intangible assets.
144
Appraisal
Rights
Medco
Stockholders
In connection with the Medco merger, record holders of Medco
common stock who comply with the procedures established by
Section 262 of the DGCL, which we refer to in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus as Section 262, summarized below
will be entitled to appraisal rights if the Medco merger is
completed. Under Section 262, as a result of completion of
the Medco merger, holders of shares of Medco common stock with
respect to which appraisal rights are properly demanded and
perfected and not withdrawn or lost are entitled, in lieu of
receiving the Medco merger consideration, to have the fair
value of their shares at the effective time of the Medco
merger (exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the mergers) judicially
determined and paid to them in cash together with a fair rate of
interest, if any, unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its
discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, by
complying with the provisions of Section 262. The
fair value of your shares of Medco common stock as
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery may be worth more
or less than, or the same as, the Medco merger consideration of
(i) $28.80 in cash, without interest and
(ii) 0.81 shares of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable New Express Scripts common stock per share of
Medco common stock that you are otherwise entitled to receive
under the terms of the merger agreement. These rights are known
as dissenters rights. The Medco stockholders who elect to
exercise dissenters rights must not vote in favor of the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement and must comply with the
provisions of Section 262, in order to perfect their
rights. Strict compliance with the statutory procedures in
Section 262 is required. Failure to follow precisely any
of the statutory requirements will result in the loss of your
dissenters rights.
This section is intended as a brief summary of the material
provisions of the Delaware statutory procedures that a
stockholder must follow in order to seek and perfect dissenters
rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement of
all applicable requirements, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to Section 262, the full text of which is
attached as Annex H to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The following summary does not constitute
any legal or other advice, nor does it constitute a
recommendation that stockholders exercise their dissenters
rights under Section 262.
Section 262 requires that where a merger agreement is to be
submitted for adoption at a meeting of stockholders, the
stockholders be notified that dissenters rights will be
available not less than 20 days before the meeting to vote
on the Medco merger. A copy of Section 262 must be included
with such notice. This joint proxy statement/prospectus
constitutes Medcos notice to its stockholders that
dissenters rights are available in connection with the Medco
merger, in compliance with the requirements of Section 262.
If you wish to consider exercising your dissenters rights, you
should carefully review the text of Section 262 contained
in Annex H. Failure to comply timely and properly with the
requirements of Section 262 will result in the loss of your
dissenters rights under the DGCL.
If you elect to demand appraisal of your shares of Medco common
stock, you must satisfy each of the following conditions: You
must deliver to Medco a written demand for appraisal of your
shares of Medco common stock before the vote is taken to approve
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, which must
reasonably inform Medco of the identity of the holder of record
of shares of Medco common stock who intends to demand appraisal
of his, her or its shares of Medco common stock; and you must
not vote or submit a proxy in favor of the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement.
If you fail to comply with either of these conditions and the
Medco merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive
payment for your shares of Medco common stock as provided for in
the merger agreement, but you will have no dissenters rights
with respect to your shares of Medco common stock. A holder of
shares of Medco common stock wishing to exercise dissenters
rights must hold the shares of Medco common stock of record on
the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must
continue to hold the shares of Medco common stock of record
through the effective time of the Medco merger, because
dissenters rights will be lost if the shares of Medco common
stock are transferred prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger. Voting against or failing to vote for the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement by itself does not constitute a
demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262. A
proxy that is submitted and does not contain voting instructions
will, unless properly revoked, be voted in favor of the proposal
to adopt the merger agreement,
145
and it will constitute a waiver of the stockholders right
of appraisal and will nullify any previously delivered written
demand for appraisal. Therefore, a Medco stockholder who submits
a proxy and who wishes to exercise dissenters rights must either
submit a proxy containing instructions to vote against the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement or abstain from voting on
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and
separate from any proxy or vote on the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement.
All demands for appraisal should be addressed to Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail Stop F3-16,
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417, Attention: General Counsel, and must
be delivered before the vote is taken to approve the proposal to
adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting, and should be
executed by, or on behalf of, the record holder of the shares of
Medco common stock. The demand must reasonably inform Medco of
the identity of the stockholder and the intention of the
stockholder to demand appraisal of his, her or its shares of
Medco common stock.
To be effective, a demand for appraisal by a stockholder of
Medco common stock must be made by, or in the name of, the
record stockholder. The demand cannot be made by the beneficial
owner if he or she does not also hold the shares of Medco common
stock of record. The beneficial holder must, in such cases, have
the registered owner, such as a bank, brokerage firm or other
nominee, submit the required demand in respect of those shares
of Medco common stock. If you hold your shares of Medco
common stock through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee and
you wish to exercise dissenters rights, you should consult with
your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to determine the
appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal
by the nominee.
If shares of Medco common stock are owned of record in a
fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian,
execution of a demand for appraisal should be made in that
capacity. If the shares of Medco common stock are owned of
record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy
in common, the demand should be executed by or for all joint
owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for
two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal
for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify
the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that,
in executing the demand, he or she is acting as agent for the
record owner. A record owner, such as a bank, brokerage firm or
other nominee, who holds shares of Medco common stock as a
nominee for others, may exercise his or her right of appraisal
with respect to the shares of Medco common stock held for one or
more beneficial owners, while not exercising this right for
other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should
state the number of shares of Medco common stock as to which
appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares of Medco common
stock is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to
cover all shares of Medco common stock held in the name of the
record owner.
Within 10 days after the effective time of the Medco
merger, the surviving corporation in the Medco merger must give
written notice that the Medco merger has become effective to
each of Medcos stockholders who has properly filed a
written demand for appraisal and who did not vote in favor of
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. At any time within
60 days after the effective time of the Medco merger, any
Medco stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding
or joined a proceeding as a named party may withdraw the demand
and accept the payment specified by the merger agreement for
that stockholders shares of Medco common stock by
delivering to the surviving corporation a written withdrawal of
the demand for appraisal. However, any such attempt to withdraw
the demand made more than 60 days after the effective time
of the Medco merger will require written approval of the
surviving corporation. No appraisal proceeding in the Delaware
Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any Medco stockholder
without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, with
such approval conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems
just; provided, however, that this provision shall not affect
the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal
proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to
withdraw such stockholders demand for appraisal and accept
the consideration offered pursuant to the merger agreement
within 60 days after the effective time of the Medco
merger. If the surviving corporation does not approve a request
to withdraw a demand for appraisal when that approval is
required, or if the Delaware Court of Chancery does not approve
the dismissal of an appraisal proceeding, the stockholder will
be entitled to receive only the appraised value
146
determined in any such appraisal proceeding, which value could
be less than, equal to or more than the consideration offered
pursuant to the merger agreement.
Within 120 days after the effective time of the Medco
merger, but not thereafter, either the surviving corporation or
any Medco stockholder who has complied with the requirements of
Section 262 and is entitled to dissenters rights under
Section 262 may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing
a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a
determination of the fair value of the shares of Medco common
stock held by all Medco stockholders entitled to appraisal. Upon
the filing of the petition by a Medco stockholder, service of a
copy of such petition shall be made upon the surviving
corporation. The surviving corporation has no obligation to file
such a petition, and holders should not assume that the
surviving corporation will file a petition. Accordingly, the
failure of a Medco stockholder to file such a petition within
the period specified could nullify the stockholders
previous written demand for appraisal. In addition, within
120 days after the effective time of the Medco merger, any
Medco stockholder who has properly filed a written demand for
appraisal and who did not vote in favor of the merger agreement,
upon written request, will be entitled to receive from the
surviving corporation, a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares of Medco common stock not voted in favor of the
merger agreement and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such
shares. The statement must be mailed within 10 days after
such written request has been received by the surviving
corporation. A person who is the beneficial owner of shares of
Medco common stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee
on behalf of such person may, in such persons own name,
file a petition for appraisal or request from the surviving
corporation such statement.
If a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a Medco stockholder
and a copy of the petition is delivered to the surviving
corporation, then the surviving corporation will be obligated,
within 20 days after receiving service of a copy of the
petition, to file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly
verified list containing the names and addresses of all
stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares of
Medco common stock and with whom agreements as to the value of
their shares of Medco common stock have not been reached. After
notice to stockholders who have demanded appraisal, if such
notice is ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the
Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing
upon the petition and to determine those stockholders who have
complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to
the dissenters rights provided by Section 262. The Delaware
Court of Chancery may require stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares of Medco common stock to submit their
stock certificates to the Register in Chancery for notation of
the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any
stockholder fails to comply with that direction, the Delaware
Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to that
stockholder. Where proceedings are not dismissed, the appraisal
proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of
the Delaware Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically
governing appraisal proceedings.
After determination of the stockholders entitled to appraisal of
their shares of Medco common stock, the Delaware Court of
Chancery will appraise the shares of Medco common stock,
determining their fair value as of the effective time of the
Medco merger after taking into account all relevant factors
exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the mergers, together with
interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be
the fair value. When the value is determined, the Delaware Court
of Chancery will direct the payment of such value upon surrender
by those stockholders of the certificates representing their
shares of Medco common stock. Unless the Court in its discretion
determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the
effective date of the Medco merger through the date of payment
of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue
at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any
surcharge) as established from time to time during the period
between the effective time of the Medco merger and the date of
payment of the judgment.
You should be aware that an investment banking opinion as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration
payable in a sale transaction, such as the merger, is not an
opinion as to, and does not otherwise address, fair value under
Section 262. Although Medco believes that the Medco
merger consideration provided for Medco stockholders in the
merger agreement is fair, no representation is made as to the
outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the
Delaware Court of Chancery
147
and Medco stockholders should recognize that such an
appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or
lower than, or the same as, the Medco merger consideration
provided for Medco stockholders in the merger agreement.
Moreover, Medco does not anticipate offering more than the
Medco merger consideration provided for Medco stockholders in
the merger agreement to any Medco stockholder exercising
dissenters rights, and Medco reserves the right to assert, in
any appraisal proceeding, that, for purposes of
Section 262, the fair value of a share of Medco
common stock is less than the Medco merger consideration
provided for Medco stockholders in the merger agreement. In
determining fair value, the Delaware Court is
required to take into account all relevant factors. In
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court
discussed the factors that could be considered in determining
fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that proof
of value by any techniques or methods which are generally
considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise
admissible in court should be considered and that
[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all
relevant factors involving the value of a company. The
Delaware Supreme Court has stated that in making this
determination of fair value the court must consider market
value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of
the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as
of the date of the merger which throw any light on future
prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 provides
that fair value is to be exclusive of any element of value
arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the
merger. In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor,
Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion
is a narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known
elements of value, but which rather applies only to the
speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment
or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court
construed Section 262 to mean that elements of future
value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known
or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the
product of speculation, may be considered.
Costs of the appraisal proceeding (which do not include
attorneys fees or the fees and expenses of experts) may be
determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and imposed upon
the surviving corporation and the Medco stockholders
participating in the appraisal proceeding by the Delaware Court
of Chancery, as it deems equitable in the circumstances. Each
dissenting stockholder is responsible for his or her
attorneys and expert witness fees, although, upon the
application of a Medco stockholder, the Delaware Court of
Chancery may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by
any Medco stockholder in connection with the appraisal
proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys fees and the fees and expenses of experts used
in the appraisal proceeding, to be charged pro rata against the
value of all shares of Medco common stock entitled to appraisal.
Any stockholder who demanded dissenters rights will not, after
the effective time of the Medco merger, be entitled to vote
shares of Medco common stock subject to that demand for any
purpose or to receive payments of dividends or any other
distribution with respect to those shares of Medco common stock,
other than with respect to payment as of a record date prior to
the effective time of the Medco merger. However, if no petition
for appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective
time of the Medco merger, or if the Medco stockholder otherwise
fails to perfect, successfully withdraws or loses such
holders right to appraisal, then the right of that
stockholder to appraisal will cease and that stockholder will be
entitled to receive the Medco merger consideration of
(i) $28.80 in cash, without interest and
(ii) 0.81 shares of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable New Express Scripts common stock for each of his,
her or its shares of Medco common stock pursuant to the merger
agreement.
In view of the complexity of Section 262 of the DGCL,
Medcos stockholders who may wish to pursue dissenters
rights should consult their legal and financial advisors.
Express
Scripts Stockholders
Express Scripts stockholders are not entitled to an appraisal by
a Delaware court of the fair value of such stockholders
shares of Express Scripts common stock under Section 262 of
the DGCL.
Certain
Contracts Between Express Scripts and Medco
Express Scripts and Medco are party to a number of commercial
arrangements with one another, which are not material,
individually or in the aggregate, to either company.
148
Restrictions
on Sales of Shares by Certain Affiliates
The shares of New Express Scripts common stock to be issued in
connection with the mergers will be registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (which we refer to as the
Securities Act) and will be freely transferable under the
Securities Act, except for shares of New Express Scripts common
stock issued to any person who is deemed to be an
affiliate of Express Scripts or Medco at the time of
the applicable special meeting. Persons who may be deemed to be
affiliates include individuals or entities that control, are
controlled by, or are under the common control of either Express
Scripts or Medco and may include our executive officers and
directors, as well as our significant stockholders. Affiliates
may not sell their shares of New Express Scripts common stock
acquired in connection with the mergers except pursuant to:
|
|
|
|
|
an effective registration statement under the Securities Act
covering the resale of those shares;
|
|
|
|
an exemption under paragraph (d) of Rule 145 under the
Securities Act; or
|
|
|
|
any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act.
|
This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not cover resales of
New Express Scripts common stock by affiliates of Express
Scripts, Medco or New Express Scripts.
Listing
of New Express Scripts Common Stock on the NASDAQ
Express Scripts has agreed to use its reasonable efforts to
cause the shares of New Express Scripts common stock to be
issued in connection with the mergers and shares of New Express
Scripts to be reserved upon exercise of options to purchase New
Express Scripts to be listed on the NASDAQ, subject to official
notice of issuance, prior to the respective effective times of
the mergers. Additionally, the effectiveness of the registration
statement for the New Express Scripts common stock is a
condition to the completion of the mergers. It is expected that
following the merger, New Express Scripts common stock will
trade on the NASDAQ under the symbol ESRX.
Delisting
and Deregistration of Medco Common Stock
If the Medco merger is completed, the Medco common stock will be
delisted from the NYSE and will no longer be registered under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer
to as the Exchange Act.
Litigation
Relating to the Mergers
Since the announcement by the parties that they had entered into
the merger agreement on July 21, 2011, twenty-two lawsuits
have been filed by purported stockholders of Medco challenging
the mergers. The complaints in the actions name as defendants
Medco and/or
various members of the Medco board as well as Express Scripts,
New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs. Descriptions of such
lawsuits that have been filed as of November 11, 2011 are
set forth below.
The plaintiffs in the purported class action complaints
generally allege, among other things, that (i) the members
of the Medco board breached their fiduciary duties to Medco and
its stockholders by authorizing the mergers and
(ii) Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger
Subs aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by
Medco and its directors. The plaintiffs seek, among other
things, to enjoin the defendants from consummating the mergers
on the
agreed-upon
terms, and unspecified compensatory damages, together with the
costs and disbursements of the action.
Among other things, the complaints allege that the price and
process leading up to the mergers was unfair. In particular,
plaintiffs allege that:
|
|
|
|
|
The terms of the mergers are not the result of an auction
process or active market check, and were arrived at without a
full and thorough investigation of strategic alternatives;
|
|
|
|
The price of the Medco merger consideration is inadequate and
undervalues Medco and its future growth prospects;
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Snow and other senior Medco executives cannot evaluate
the proposed mergers impartially because they stand to receive
change in control payments upon consummation of the
mergers; and
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement contains preclusive deal protection devices
that restrain Medcos ability to solicit or engage in
negotiations with third parties regarding a proposal to acquire
all or a significant interest in Medco, as well as a termination
fee that deters potential bidders from coming forward.
|
Following the filing of the Form S-4 relating to the
mergers on October 6, 2011, several plaintiffs amended
their complaints to include allegations that disclosures made in
the Form S-4 failed to disclose all material facts about
the process leading up to the mergers.
Delaware
Court of Chancery
As of November 11, 2011, ten complaints have been filed in
the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, captioned as
follows: Chevedden v. Snow, et al., C.A.
No. 6694-CS;
Colanino v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
C.A.
No. 6708-CS;
Knisley v. Snow, et al., C.A.
No. 6710-CS;
Heimowitz v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
C.A.
No. 6711-CS;
Waber v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 6716-CS;
U.F.C.W. Local 1776 & Participating Emp. Pension
Fund v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 6720-CS;
Westchester Putnman Counties Heavy & Highway
Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds v. Medco Health Solutions,
Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 6723-CS;
Labourers Pension Fund of Cent. & E. Cana. v.
Snow, et al., C.A.
No. 6725-CS;
Johnson v. Medco Health Solutzions, Inc., et al.,
C.A.
No. 6726-CS;
and Schoenwald v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et
al., C.A.
No. 6727-CS.
Defendants filed answers to all of the complaints in these
actions, and requests for discovery have been served by
plaintiffs in the Chevedden, Heimowitz,
U.F.C.W., and Schoenwald actions.
On August 9, 2011, the Delaware Court of Chancery
consolidated the ten actions pending before the Court as In
re Medco Health Solutions, Inc. Shareholders Litigation,
Consol., C.A.
No. 6720-CS
, which we refer to as the Delaware action.
On August 23, 2011, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered
an order certifying a class of Medco stockholders consisting of
all record holders and beneficial owners of Medco common stock,
together with their successors and assigns, during the period
commencing on the date on which the Medco board approved the
Medco merger, and ending at the effective time of the Medco
merger. The Court of Chancery appointed plaintiffs
Labourers Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada,
Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers
Local 60 Benefit Fund and U.F.C.W. Local 1776 &
Participating Employers Pension Fund as co-lead plaintiffs and
class representatives, the law firms of Robbins Geller
Rudman & Dowd LLP and Labaton Sucharow LLP as co-lead
counsel for the class, the law firm of Bouchard
Margules & Friedlander, P.A. as liaison counsel for
the class, and the law firms of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP,
Harwood Feffer LLP, Federman & Sherwood, Saxena White
P.A., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP,
Faruqi & Faruqi LLP and Fish &
Richardson, P.C. as members of the plaintiffs
executive committee.
New
Jersey Federal District Court
As of November 11, 2011, seven complaints have been filed
in the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey, captioned as follows: Nadoff v. Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04248-WJM-MF;
Louisiana Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys. v. Medco
Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04211-DMC-MF;
Puerto Rico Govt Emps. & Judiciary Ret. Sys.
Admin. v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04259-DMC-MF;
Sollins v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04307-DMC-MF;
United Food & Commercial Workers Local 23 &
Emprs Pension Fund v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc.,
et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04328-DMC-MF;
Oppenheim Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH v. Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04322-DMC-MF;
and Intl Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Pension
Fund v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. 2:11-cv-04412-DMC-MF.
On August 1, 2011, plaintiff in the Louisiana Mun.
Police Emps. Ret. Sys. action filed an application for
expedited discovery, and on August 3, 2011, Magistrate
Judge Falk held a teleconference with the parties regarding the
application for expedited discovery. On August 5, 2011,
plaintiff in the Louisiana Mun. Police
150
Emps. Ret. Sys. action filed an Amended Complaint,
which contains substantially the same allegations as
plaintiffs original complaint.
On August 8, 2011, defendants filed in the Louisiana
Mun. Police Emps. Ret. Sys. action a Motion to Dismiss
the Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(1), a Motion to Stay in favor of the Delaware
Action, and an opposition to plaintiffs application for
expedited discovery. Express Scripts also filed a motion to
dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
On August 17, 2011, the District Court consolidated the
actions pending before it as In re: Medco/Express Scripts Merger
Litigation,
No. 11-4211
(DMC)(MF), and appointed Carrela, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein,
Brody & Agnello; Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A.;
and Bernstein Litiowitz Berger & Grossman LLP as
Interim Lead Counsel, and Motley Rice LLC; Pomerantz Haudek
Grossman & Gross; Brower Piven, A Professional
Corporation; and Barrack, Rodos & Bacine as
Plaintiffs Executive Committee. We refer to this action as
the district court action.
On August 18, 2011, plaintiffs in the district court action
filed a motion for class certification, seeking certification of
the same class of Medco stockholders that has since been
certified by the Court of Chancery in the Delaware action.
Defendants filed their answering brief in opposition to
plaintiffs motion on September 6, 2011. Plaintiffs
filed their reply brief on September 13, 2011.
On September 19, 2011, the District Court issued an order
denying defendants Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and Motion to
Stay in favor of the Delaware Action. On September 23,
2011, Express Scripts filed a Motion to Certify the District
Courts September 19, 2011 order for interlocutory
appeal, and a motion to stay proceedings pending appeal. The
parties are currently briefing those motions.
Superior
Court of New Jersey
As of November 11, 2011, five complaints have been filed in
the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, captioned as
follows: Levinson v. Snow, et al.,
No. C-215-11;
Kramer v. Snow, et al.,
No. C-217-11;
Snider v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. C-220-11;
Prongay v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. C-232-11;
and Lasker v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., et al.,
No. C-246-11.
On July 27, 2011, plaintiffs in the Levinson and
Kramer actions filed a Motion for Consolidation of
Related Cases and Appointment of Interim Class Counsel.
On August 10, 2011, plaintiffs in the Levinson and
Kramer actions filed a Motion for Expedited Proceedings.
On August 11, 2011, Express Scripts filed in the
Levinson and Kramer actions an Opposition to
plaintiffs Motion for Consolidation of Related Cases and
Appointment of Lead Counsel and a Cross-Motion to Dismiss or
Stay the Action in Favor of the Delaware action.
On August 26, 2011, the Court entered a stipulated order
staying all of the Superior Court actions in favor of the
Delaware action.
Memorandum
of Understanding
The complaints in the foregoing actions name as defendants Medco
and/or various members of the Medco board as well as Express
Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs. Medco and
Express Scripts continue to deny that they engaged in any of the
wrongdoing alleged in the complaints; however, to avoid the risk
that the litigation might delay or otherwise adversely affect
the consummation of the mergers and to minimize the expense of
defending such actions, on November 7, 2011, Express
Scripts and Medco entered into a memorandum of understanding
with plaintiffs to settle the stockholder litigation pending in
the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
and the Delaware Court of Chancery regarding the proposed
mergers. Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, Express
Scripts and Medco entered into the first amendment to the merger
agreement and agreed to hold the special meetings of their
respective stockholders to vote on the proposed mergers on such
date or dates as determined by Medco and Express Scripts, but in
no event prior to December 21, 2011. Express Scripts and
Medco also agreed to include certain
151
additional disclosures concerning the merger agreement and the
mergers, which we refer to as the supplemental disclosures, in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Subject to completion of
confirmatory discovery on the supplemental disclosures by
counsel to the plaintiffs, the memorandum of understanding
contemplates that the parties will enter into a stipulation of
settlement. The stipulation of settlement will be subject to
customary conditions, including court approval following notice
to Medcos shareholders. In the event that the parties
enter into a stipulation of settlement, a hearing will be
scheduled at which the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey will consider the fairness,
reasonableness, and adequacy of the settlement. If the
settlement is approved by the court, it will resolve and release
all claims in all actions that were or could have been brought
challenging any aspect of the mergers, the merger agreement, and
any disclosure made in connection therewith (but excluding
claims for appraisal under Delaware law). In addition, in
connection with the settlement, the parties contemplate that
plaintiffs counsel will file a petition in the court for
an award of attorneys fees and expenses to be paid by
Medco or its successor. Medco or its successor will pay or
cause to be paid any attorneys fees and expenses awarded
by the court. However, final court approval of the settlement is
not contingent on an agreement for attorneys fees and
expenses. The settlement will not affect the merger
consideration. There can be no assurance that the parties will
ultimately enter into a stipulation of settlement or that the
court will approve the settlement even if the parties were to
enter into such stipulation. In such event, the proposed
settlement as contemplated by the memorandum of understanding
may be terminated.
152
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms and conditions
of the merger agreement. This summary may not contain all the
information about the merger agreement that is important to you.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
merger agreement and the first amendment to the merger agreement
attached as Annex A to, and incorporated by reference into,
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to
read the merger agreement and the first amendment to the merger
agreement in their entirety because they are the legal documents
that govern the mergers.
Explanatory Note Regarding the Merger Agreement and the
Summary of the Merger Agreement: Representations, Warranties and
Covenants in the Merger Agreement Are Not Intended to Function
or Be Relied on as Public Disclosures
The merger agreement and the summary of its terms in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus have been included to provide
information about the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement. The terms and information in the merger agreement are
not intended to provide any other public disclosure of factual
information about Express Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts
and the Merger Subs or any of their respective subsidiaries or
affiliates. The representations, warranties and covenants
contained in the merger agreement are made by Express Scripts,
Medco, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs only for the
purposes of the merger agreement and were qualified and subject
to certain limitations and exceptions agreed to by Express
Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs in
connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement.
In particular, in your review of the representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement and described in
this summary, it is important to bear in mind that the
representations and warranties were made solely for the benefit
of the parties to the merger agreement and were negotiated for
the purpose of allocating contractual risk among the parties to
the merger agreement rather than to establish matters as facts.
The representations and warranties may also be subject to a
contractual standard of materiality or material adverse effect
different from those generally applicable to stockholders and
reports and documents filed with the SEC and in some cases may
be qualified by disclosures made by one party to the other,
which are not necessarily reflected in the merger agreement.
Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the
representations and warranties, which do not purport to be
accurate as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, may have changed since the date of the
merger agreement, and subsequent developments or new information
qualifying a representation or warranty may have been included
in or incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
For the foregoing reasons, the representations, warranties and
covenants or any descriptions of those provisions should not be
read alone or relied upon as characterizations of the actual
state of facts or condition of Express Scripts, Medco, New
Express Scripts or any of their respective subsidiaries or
affiliates. Instead, such provisions or descriptions should be
read only in conjunction with the other information provided
elsewhere in this document or incorporated by reference into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Structure
of the Mergers
The merger agreement provides, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions thereof, for two separate mergers involving Express
Scripts and Medco, respectively. First, Express Scripts Merger
Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts, will
merge with and into Express Scripts, with Express Scripts
surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of New Express
Scripts. Second, immediately following the consummation of the
Express Scripts merger, the merger agreement provides for the
merger of Medco Merger Sub, another wholly owned subsidiary of
New Express Scripts, with and into Medco, with Medco surviving
the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts.
As a result of the mergers, both of the surviving entities of
the Express Scripts merger and the Medco merger will become
wholly owned subsidiaries of New Express Scripts, which is
expected to be listed for trading on the NASDAQ.
Closing
Unless another time and place is agreed to by Express Scripts
and Medco, the closing will occur as soon as practicable (but in
any event, within three business days) after satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions set
153
forth in the merger agreement (except for any conditions that
by their nature can only be satisfied on the closing date, but
subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions);
provided, however, that notwithstanding the satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
neither Express Scripts nor Medco are obligated to effect the
closing prior to the third business day following the final day
of the marketing period (described below under
Marketing Period) or such earlier date
as Express Scripts may request on two business days
written notice to Medco. However, a failure to commence the
marketing period is not a condition to the parties
obligations to effect the closing if it would cause the closing
to occur after the fourth business day prior to the outside date
(as it may be extended). For a description of the conditions to
the closing of the mergers, see the section entitled
Conditions to the Mergers beginning on
page 174.
Marketing
Period
The marketing period referred to above is the first
period of 20 consecutive calendar days after the date of the
merger agreement throughout which the conditions to Express
Scripts obligation to consummate the mergers have been
satisfied (except for any conditions that by their nature can
only be satisfied on the closing date, but subject to the
satisfaction of such conditions or waiver by the party entitled
to waive such conditions) and nothing has occurred that would
cause any of the conditions to Express Scripts obligations
to consummate the mergers to fail to be satisfied assuming the
closing were to be scheduled for any time during such 20
calendar day period. If the marketing period has not been
completed (i) prior to December 19, 2011, the
marketing period will commence no earlier than January 3,
2012, (ii) prior to August 20, 2012, the marketing
period will commence no earlier than September 3, 2012 and
(iii) prior to December 24, 2012, the marketing period
will commence no earlier than January 2, 2013; provided,
that November
23-27, 2011
and November
21-25, 2012
are not considered calendar days for purposes of the definition
of marketing period but a period including such days
is considered a consecutive period for such purposes. Regardless
of whether or not the marketing period has commenced, the
marketing period will not extend beyond the fourth business day
prior to the outside date (as it may be extended).
Effective
Times
The mergers will become effective at the time at which the
applicable certificate of merger has been duly filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such other
time agreed upon by the parties and specified in the applicable
certificate of merger. The certificates of merger for both the
Express Scripts merger and the Medco merger will be filed on the
closing date, and the merger agreement provides that the filing
of the certificate of merger for the Express Scripts merger will
occur immediately prior to the filing of the certificate of
merger for the Medco merger.
Merger
Consideration Received by Express Scripts Stockholders
At the effective time of the Express Scripts merger, each
outstanding share of Express Scripts common stock, other than
Express Scripts excluded shares, will be converted into one
share of New Express Scripts common stock (without the
requirement for the surrender of any certificate previously
representing any shares of Express Scripts common stock or
issuance of new certificates representing New Express Scripts
common stock).
Merger
Consideration Received by Medco Stockholders
At the effective time of the Medco merger, each outstanding
share of Medco common stock, other than Medco excluded shares,
will be converted into: (i) the right to receive $28.80 in
cash, without interest and (ii) 0.81 shares of validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable of New Express Scripts
common stock; provided, that Medco stockholders will not receive
any fractional shares of New Express Scripts common stock
pursuant to the Medco merger. Instead of receiving any
fractional shares, each holder of Medco common stock will be
paid an amount in cash, without interest, rounded down to the
nearest cent, equal to the product of (A) the amount of the
fractional share interest in a share of New Express Scripts
common stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled
(rounded to three decimal places) and (B) an amount equal
to the
154
average of the closing sale prices of the Express Scripts common
stock on the NASDAQ for each of the 15 consecutive trading days
ending with the fourth complete trading day prior to the closing
date.
Treatment
of Medco Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
Medco
Stock Options
Each Medco stock option that is outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco merger,
whether or not vested or exercisable, will be assumed by New
Express Scripts and will be converted into a stock option to
acquire New Express Scripts common stock, which we refer to as a
New Express Scripts stock option, entitling its holder to
receive, upon exercise, a number of whole shares of New Express
Scripts common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share)
equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Medco
common stock subject to such Medco stock option and
(ii) the sum of (A) 0.81 and (B) the quotient
obtained by dividing (1) $28.80 by (2) an amount equal
to the average of the closing sale prices of Express Scripts
common stock on the NASDAQ for each of the 15 consecutive
trading days ending with the fourth complete trading day prior
to the closing date. We refer to the sum described in
clause (ii) above as the stock award exchange ratio. The
New Express Scripts stock option will have an exercise price per
share (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) equal to the
quotient obtained by dividing (x) the exercise price per
share of Medco common stock of such Medco stock option by
(y) the stock award exchange ratio. The exercise price and
the number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock subject
to the New Express Scripts stock option will be determined in a
manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of
the Code, and, in the case of Medco stock options that are
intended to qualify as incentive stock options within the
meaning of Section 422 of the Code, consistent with the
requirements of Section 424 of the Code.
Each such New Express Scripts stock option will continue to be
subject to the same terms and conditions that applied to the
Medco stock option immediately prior to the effective time of
the Medco merger (but, taking into account any changes to such
Medco stock option provided for in the Medco stock plans or
award agreements or by reason of the merger agreement).
The right to acquire shares of Medco common stock under the
Medco Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which we refer to as the
Medco ESPP, is not treated as a Medco stock option for purposes
of the merger agreement. Instead, each individual participating
in the offering period in progress as of the closing date, which
we refer to as the final offering, will receive a notice of the
mergers no later than 20 days prior to the closing date,
will have an opportunity to terminate his or her outstanding
purchase rights under the Medco ESPP and the final offering will
end no later than the 10th business day prior to the closing
date. Each Medco ESPP participants accumulated
contributions under the Medco ESPP will be used to purchase
shares of Medco common stock in accordance with the terms of the
Medco ESPP as of the end of the final offering and the
applicable purchase price for Medco common stock as set forth in
the Medco ESPP will not be decreased below the levels set forth
in the Medco ESPP as of the date of the merger agreement. The
Medco ESPP will terminate immediately following the end of the
final offering and no further rights will be granted or
exercised under the Medco ESPP.
Medco
Restricted Stock Units
Each Medco restricted stock unit award that is outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco merger that
is not vested will be assumed by New Express Scripts and will be
converted into a restricted stock unit award, which we refer to
as a New Express Scripts restricted stock unit, for the number
of shares of New Express Scripts common stock equal to the
product of (i) the number of shares of Medco common stock
underlying such Medco restricted stock unit multiplied by
(ii) the stock award exchange ratio. Each such New Express
Scripts restricted stock unit will continue to be subject to the
same terms and conditions as applied to the Medco restricted
stock unit immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger (but, taking into account any changes to such Medco
restricted stock unit provided for in the Medco stock plans and
award agreements or by reason of the merger agreement).
Each vested Medco restricted stock unit that has not been
settled and is subject to a deferral election, which we refer to
as a Medco deferred stock unit, will be assumed by New Express
Scripts and will be
155
converted into a deferred stock unit, which we refer to as a New
Express Scripts deferred stock unit, entitling its holder to
receive a number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock
equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Medco
common stock subject to such Medco deferred stock unit
multiplied by (ii) the stock award exchange ratio. Each
such New Express Scripts deferred stock unit will continue to be
subject to the same terms and conditions that applied to the
Medco deferred stock unit immediately prior to the effective
time of the Medco merger (but, taking into account any changes
to such Medco deferred stock unit provided for in the Medco
stock plans and award agreements or by reason of the merger
agreement).
Medco
Performance Stock Units
Each performance stock unit award granted that is outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco merger,
whether or not vested, will be assumed by New Express Scripts
and will be converted into a performance share unit award, which
we refer to as a New Express Scripts performance share unit, to
acquire the number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock
equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of Medco
common stock underlying such Medco performance stock unit
multiplied by (ii) the stock award exchange ratio. Each
such New Express Scripts performance share unit will continue to
have, and will be subject to, the same terms and conditions as
applied to the Medco performance stock unit immediately prior to
the effective time of the Medco merger (but, taking into account
any changes to such Medco performance stock unit award provided
for in the Medco stock plans and award agreements or by reason
of the merger agreement); provided, that if, after the effective
time of the Medco merger, the performance program is
discontinued or the performance metrics applicable to such Medco
performance stock units otherwise cease to be measurable on the
same terms as immediately prior to the effective time of the
Medco merger, then such Medco performance stock units will be
valued based on target performance, and will be paid out at the
time, and subject to any applicable payment conditions,
prescribed by the terms in effect for such Medco performance
stock units immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger. Additionally, Medco performance stock units will be
subject to any payment delays required by Section 409A of
the Code.
Treatment
of Express Scripts Stock Options and Other Stock-Based
Awards
Express
Scripts Stock Options
Each Express Scripts stock option and Express Scripts stock
appreciation right outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time of the Express Scripts merger, whether or not
vested or exercisable, will cease to represent a right to
acquire Express Scripts common stock and will be converted into
New Express Scripts stock options or New Express Scripts stock
appreciation rights, as the case may be, on substantially the
same terms and conditions (including vesting schedule and per
share exercise price) as applied to such Express Scripts stock
option or Express Scripts stock appreciation right immediately
prior to the effective time of the Express Scripts merger.
Express
Scripts Restricted Stock Awards
Each share of Express Scripts restricted stock and each Express
Scripts restricted stock unit that is outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the Express Scripts merger,
whether or not vested, will cease to represent a share of
Express Scripts restricted stock or Express Scripts restricted
stock unit, as applicable, and will be converted automatically
into New Express Scripts restricted stock or a New Express
Scripts restricted stock unit, as applicable, on substantially
the same terms and conditions (including vesting schedule) as
applied to such Express Scripts restricted stock or such
restricted stock unit immediately prior to the effective time of
the Express Scripts merger.
Express
Scripts Performance Share Awards
Each Express Scripts performance share award will cease to
represent a share of Express Scripts common stock and will be
converted automatically into a New Express Scripts performance
share award on
156
substantially the same terms and conditions as applied to such
Express Scripts performance award immediately prior to the
effective time of the Express Scripts merger.
Conversion
of Shares; Exchange of Certificates; No Fractional
Shares
Conversion
and Exchange of Medco Common Stock
The conversion of shares of Medco common stock, other than the
Medco excluded shares, into (i) the right to receive $28.80
in cash, without interest and (ii) 0.81 shares of
validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable New Express
Scripts common stock will occur automatically at the effective
time of the Medco merger. As soon as reasonably practicable
after the effective time of the Medco merger, New Express
Scripts exchange agent will mail to each holder of record
of a certificate whose shares of Medco common stock were
converted into the right to receive the Medco merger
consideration, a letter of transmittal. The letter of
transmittal will specify that delivery shall be effected, and
risk of loss and title to the certificates will pass, only upon
delivery of the certificates to the exchange agent. The letter
of transmittal will be accompanied by instructions for
surrendering the certificates in exchange for the Medco merger
consideration, including New Express Scripts common stock (which
will be issued in non-certificated book entry form unless a
physical certificate is requested), the cash portion of the
Medco merger consideration, any dividends or distributions
payable pursuant to the merger agreement and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares of New Express Scripts common stock. No
interest will be paid or will accrue on any cash payable upon
surrender of a certificate. Medco stockholders should not
return stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card.
After the effective time of the Medco merger, shares of Medco
common stock will no longer be outstanding and cease to exist,
until surrendered, and each certificate that previously
represented shares of Medco common stock will represent only the
right to receive the Medco merger consideration as described
above.
Until holders of certificates previously representing Medco
common stock have surrendered their certificates to the exchange
agent for exchange, those holders will not receive dividends or
distributions on the shares of New Express Scripts common stock
into which those shares have been converted with a record date
after the effective time of the Medco merger. Subject to
applicable law, when holders surrender their certificates, they
will receive any dividends on shares of New Express Scripts
common stock with a record date after the effective time of the
Medco merger and a payment date on or prior to the date of
surrender, without interest.
Any holder of book entry shares will not be required to deliver
a certificate or an executed letter of transmittal to the
exchange agent to receive the Medco merger consideration that
such holder is entitled to receive pursuant to the merger
agreement.
In lieu thereof, each holder of record of one or more book entry
shares whose shares of Medco common stock will be converted into
the right to receive the Medco merger consideration shall
automatically, upon the effective time of the Medco merger (or,
at any later time at which such book entry share shall be so
converted), be entitled to receive, and New Express Scripts
shall cause the exchange agent to pay and deliver as promptly as
practicable after the effective time of the Medco merger, the
Medco merger consideration, including New Express Scripts common
stock (which will be issued in non-certificated book entry form
unless a physical certificate is requested), the cash portion of
the Medco merger consideration, any dividends or distributions
payable pursuant to the merger agreement and cash in lieu of any
fractional shares of New Express Scripts common stock. The book
entry shares of Medco common stock held by such holder will be
canceled.
Medco stockholders will not receive any fractional shares of New
Express Scripts common stock pursuant to the Medco merger.
Instead of receiving any fractional shares, each holder of Medco
common stock will be paid an amount in cash, without interest,
rounded down to the nearest cent, equal to the product of
(i) the amount of the fractional share interest in a share
of New Express Scripts common stock to which such holder would
otherwise be entitled (rounded to three decimal places) and
(ii) an amount equal to the average of the
157
closing sale prices of Express Scripts common stock on the
NASDAQ for each of the 15 consecutive trading days ending with
the fourth complete trading day prior to the closing date.
New Express Scripts will be entitled to deduct and withhold from
the Medco merger consideration otherwise payable to any holder
of Medco common stock any amounts required to be deducted and
withheld under the Code, or under any provision of state, local
or foreign tax law.
Conversion
of Express Scripts Common Stock
The conversion of shares of Express Scripts common stock into
shares of New Express Scripts common stock will occur
automatically at the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger. All of the shares of Express Scripts common stock
converted into New Express Scripts common stock pursuant to the
Express Scripts merger will cease to be outstanding and will
cease to exist. As of the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger, holders of Express Scripts common stock will be deemed
to have received shares of New Express Scripts common stock
(without the requirement to surrender any certificate previously
representing shares of Express Scripts common stock or issuance
of new certificates representing New Express Scripts common
stock). Each certificate representing shares of Express Scripts
common stock prior to the effective time of the Express Scripts
merger will be deemed to automatically represent an equivalent
number of shares of New Express Scripts common stock.
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains a number of representations and
warranties made by the parties thereto that are subject in some
cases to exceptions and qualifications (including exceptions
that do not result in, and would not reasonably be expected to
have, a material adverse effect). See also the
definition of material adverse effect beginning on
page 160 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The
representations and warranties in the merger agreement relate
to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the due organization, valid existence, good standing and
qualification to do business, the corporate power and authority
of such party and, in the case of Medco, its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the capitalization of such party, including the number of shares
of common stock, stock options and other stock-based awards
outstanding and the ownership of the capital stock of each of
its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
corporate authorization of the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the valid
and binding nature of the merger agreement as to such party;
|
|
|
|
the unanimous approval and recommendation by such partys
board of directors of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and the inapplicability of
anti-takeover laws;
|
|
|
|
the consents and approvals required from governmental entities
in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any conflicts with such partys
organizational documents, applicable laws, governmental orders
or certain contracts as a result of such party entering into the
merger agreement, complying with its terms or consummating the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the proper filing or furnishing of required documents with the
SEC since January 1, 2009; the accuracy of information
contained in such documents; the compliance of the consolidated
financial statements contained in such documents with the rules
and regulations of the SEC applicable thereto and with
U.S. GAAP;
|
|
|
|
such partys compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002; the absence of certain investigations relating to
accounting practices; such partys disclosure controls and
procedures relating to financial reporting; the absence of
certain undisclosed liabilities; the statutory financial
statements of certain of such partys insurance company
subsidiaries;
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
such partys conduct of its businesses in the ordinary
course and the absence of a material adverse effect (as
described below) since the end of such partys last fiscal
year;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of information supplied by such party in connection
with this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the associated
registration statement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain legal proceedings, investigations and
governmental orders;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws and governmental orders since
January 1, 2008; compliance with the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act of 1977 and the absence of any investigations by
governmental entities related to the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act of 1977 since January 1, 2008;
|
|
|
|
the possession of and compliance with required permits necessary
for the conduct of such partys business; compliance with
applicable health care laws; the absence of certain allegations
of violations of health care laws since January 1, 2008;
the absence of certain penalties, convictions or legal
proceedings relating to certain federal programs and laws since
January 1, 2008; compliance with healthcare information
laws;
|
|
|
|
compliance with certain laws and guidance relating to the
operation of pharmacies and the labeling of prescription drugs
and the absence of sanctions by governmental entities related to
such activities; compliance by certain of such partys
insurance subsidiaries with the reporting requirements
promulgated by governmental entities; the receipt of applicable
approvals from governmental entities for policy forms and
certificates and compliance with laws applicable to such forms
and certificates; the performance by certain of such
partys insurance subsidiaries of their obligations under
certain insurance agreements; the filing of or receipt of
approvals from governmental entities for premium rates, ratings
plans and policy terms of certain of such partys insurance
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
compliance by certain of such partys insurance
subsidiaries with applicable laws since January 1, 2008;
the absence of certain charges or investigations by state
insurance regulatory authorities or orders by governmental
entities relating to such insurance subsidiaries; the
authorization of such insurance subsidiaries by certain state
insurance regulatory authorities;
|
|
|
|
the absence of certain changes relating to such partys
benefits plans;
|
|
|
|
ERISA matters; certain
non-U.S. benefit
plans; certain compensation, severance and termination pay
related to the execution of the merger agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
employment and labor matters, including matters relating to
collective bargaining agreements, agreements with works councils
and labor practices;
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental laws since January 1, 2008;
the absence of certain environmental claims or conditions that
could result in such claims; matters relating to materials of
environmental concern;
|
|
|
|
real property;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
insurance policies with respect to such partys business
and assets;
|
|
|
|
brokers and financial advisors fees related to the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
the ability to make additional representations necessary to
obtain certain opinions of tax counsel.
|
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have
also, jointly and severally, made certain representations and
warranties relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
the capitalization of the Merger Subs and New Express Scripts;
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
financing, the validity of the debt commitment letter and the
sufficiency of the funds to be provided under the debt
commitment letters; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of the opinions from Express Scripts financial
advisors.
|
Medco has also made certain representations and warranties
relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
the validity of, enforceability of and compliance with, certain
material contracts; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of the opinions from Medcos financial advisors.
|
Certain of the representations and warranties made by the
parties are qualified as to materiality or
material adverse effect. For purposes of the merger
agreement, material adverse effect, when used in
reference to Express Scripts or Medco, means any event, change,
effect, development, state of facts, condition, circumstances or
occurrence (including any development arising after the date of
the merger agreement in any legal proceeding) that, individually
or in the aggregate, has or would be reasonably expected to
have, a material adverse effect on the business, results of
operations, assets, liabilities or financial condition of the
referenced party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, except
to the extent such material adverse effect results from:
|
|
|
|
|
any changes in general United States or global economic
conditions, except in the event that such changes in conditions
have greater adverse materially disproportionate effect on such
party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the
adverse effect such changes have on others operating in the
industries in which such party and any of its subsidiaries
operate;
|
|
|
|
any changes in conditions generally affecting any of the
industries in which such party and its subsidiaries operate,
except in the event that such changes in conditions have a
greater adverse materially disproportionate effect on such party
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the adverse
effect such changes have on others operating in such industries;
|
|
|
|
any decline in the market price or trading volume of the common
stock of such party (it being understood that the facts or
occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such decline may
be taken into account in determining whether there has been or
would be a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
any regulatory, legislative or political conditions or
securities, credit, financial or other capital markets
conditions, in each case in the United States or any foreign
jurisdiction, except in the event that such conditions have a
greater adverse materially disproportionate effect on such party
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the adverse
effect such changes have on others operating in the industries
in which such party and any of its subsidiaries operate;
|
|
|
|
any failure, in and of itself, by such party to meet any
internal or published projections, forecasts, estimates or
predictions in respect of revenues, earnings or other financial
or operating metrics for any period (it being understood that
the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such
failure may be taken into account in determining whether there
has been or would be a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the public
announcement or pendency of the mergers or any of the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
impact thereof on the relationships, contractual or otherwise,
of such party or any of its subsidiaries with customers,
suppliers or partners;
|
|
|
|
any change in applicable law, regulation or U.S. GAAP (or
authoritative interpretations thereof);
|
|
|
|
any geopolitical conditions, the outbreak or escalation of
hostilities, any acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any
escalation or worsening of any such acts of war, sabotage or
terrorism threatened or underway as of the date of the merger
agreement, except in the event that such conditions or events
have a greater adverse materially disproportionate effect on
such and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the
adverse effect such changes have on others operating in the
industries in which such party and any of its subsidiaries
operate; or
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
any action required to be taken pursuant to or in accordance
with the merger agreement or taken at the request of the other
party.
|
The representations and warranties of each of the parties to the
merger agreement will expire upon the effective times of the
mergers.
Covenants
and Agreements
Conduct
of Business by Medco
Medco has agreed that, prior to the completion of the Medco
merger, unless Express Scripts gives its prior written consent
or as otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by the
merger agreement, it will and will cause its subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past
practice; and
|
|
|
|
use reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve intact its
business organization, (ii) maintain in effect all
necessary foreign, federal, state and local licenses, permits,
consents, franchises, approvals and authorizations and
(iii) maintain satisfactory relationships with its
customers, lenders, suppliers and others having material
business relationships with it and with governmental entities
with jurisdiction over health care related matters.
|
Medco has also agreed that, prior to the completion of the Medco
merger, unless Express Scripts gives its prior written consent,
or as otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by the
merger agreement, it will not and will not permit any of its
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend Medcos charter or by-laws or other similar
organizational documents (whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
|
|
|
|
issue, sell, grant, dispose of, pledge or otherwise encumber, or
authorize or propose the issuance, sale, disposition or pledge
or other encumbrance of (A) any additional shares of
Medcos capital stock or any securities or rights
convertible into, exchangeable for, or evidencing the right to
subscribe for any shares of its capital stock, or any rights,
warrants, options, calls, restricted stock units, commitments or
any other agreements to acquire any shares of its capital stock
or any securities or rights convertible into, exchangeable for,
or evidencing the right to subscribe for any shares of the
capital stock of Medco or any of its subsidiaries, or
(B) any other securities in respect of, in lieu of, or in
substitution for, any shares of capital stock or options of
Medco or any of its subsidiaries outstanding on the date of the
merger agreement, other than the (i) issuance of shares of
Medco common stock pursuant to the exercise of Medco stock
options, vesting of Medco restricted stock units and Medco
performance stock units and vesting, exercise or settlement of
Medco deferred stock units under the Medco benefit plans in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and
(ii) grant of any options or rights under the Medco benefit
plans after the date of the merger agreement to purchase or
acquire shares of Medco common stock in an amount not in excess
of 11,300,000 shares to directors and employees, and to
executive officers in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice (in addition, if the closing date occurs on
or after April 1, 2012, Medco is permitted to make
(x) annual grants to directors and (y) grants pursuant
to the terms of its collective bargaining agreements in effect
as of the date of the merger agreement or as entered into in
compliance with the terms of the merger agreement);
|
|
|
|
accelerate the vesting of any Medco stock options, Medco
restricted stock units, Medco performance stock units or Medco
deferred stock units, except as may be required pursuant to the
terms of the merger agreement or such Medco benefit plans in
effect on the date of the merger agreement; redeem, purchase or
otherwise acquire, or propose to redeem, purchase or otherwise
acquire, any of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Medco
or any of its subsidiaries (other than pursuant to the Medco
benefit plans); split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any
shares of its capital stock or declare, set aside for payment or
pay any dividend, or make any other actual, constructive or
deemed distribution, in respect of any shares of its capital
stock or otherwise make any payments to its stockholders in
their capacity as such;
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
other than borrowings under Medcos credit facilities and
other lines of credit in existence on the date of the merger
agreement and any renewals, refinancings or extensions of
certain specified credit facilities and lines of credit that are
effected on substantially the same terms and in principal
amounts not in excess of such debt refinanced in effect on the
date of the merger agreement, incur any new indebtedness for
borrowed money or modify in any material respect the terms of
any existing indebtedness for borrowed money or assume,
guarantee or endorse or otherwise become responsible for any
such indebtedness of any person other than a wholly owned
subsidiary, make any loans or advances to any person other than
a wholly owned subsidiary or issue or sell any debt securities
or calls, options, warrants, or other rights to acquire any debt
securities of Medco or its subsidiaries or enter into any
keep well or contract to maintain any financial
statement condition of another person other than an affiliate or
enter into any agreement having the economic effect of the
foregoing, other than the incurrence of unsecured indebtedness
or similar obligations less than $75 million individually
and $300 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
redeem, repurchase, prepay, defease or cancel any indebtedness
for borrowed money, other than as required in accordance with
its terms or in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice;
|
|
|
|
sell, transfer, license or otherwise dispose of by any means, or
agree to do any of the foregoing with respect to, any of its
material properties, assets, operations, product lines or
businesses except for sales, transfers or dispositions by any
means, and agreements for any of the foregoing, in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, pursuant to
contracts in force on the date of the merger agreement,
dispositions of obsolete or worthless assets or transfers among
Medco and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
make any acquisition of, or investment in, a business, by
purchase of stock, securities or assets, merger or
consolidation, or contributions to capital, in any such case
outside the ordinary course of business, other than transactions
among Medco and any of its subsidiaries or pursuant to contracts
in effect as of the date of the merger agreement with a value or
purchase price in excess of $60 million, individually, or
$250 million in the aggregate, or that is or would have any
reasonable possibility of preventing or delaying the closing
beyond the outside date (as it may be extended) or could
increase the likelihood of a failure to satisfy the condition
that no order prohibiting the mergers has been issued by a
governmental entity or the condition that the applicable
antitrust waiting periods have expired or have been terminated
and the applicable governmental approvals have been received;
|
|
|
|
enter into a new line of business directly or indirectly;
|
|
|
|
make or authorize any payment of, accrual or commitment for,
capital expenditures in any 12 month period in excess of
$50 million in the aggregate more than the amount
previously budgeted for such period;
|
|
|
|
enter into, modify, amend, continue, cancel, renew or terminate
any contract or waive, release or assign any material rights or
claims thereunder, which would reasonably be expected to prevent
or materially delay or impair the ability of Medco and its
subsidiaries to consummate the mergers, or materially impair the
ability of Medco and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to
conduct their business in ordinary course consistent with past
practice;
|
|
|
|
extend, renew or enter into any contracts containing non-compete
or exclusivity provisions that would materially restrict or
limit the operations of Medco and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole; provided, that, no such non-compete or exclusivity
limitations will apply to the affiliates of Medco except in the
case of extensions and renewals to existing contracts on the
same terms;
|
|
|
|
except as required under existing plans and arrangements as of
the date of the merger agreement or by applicable law, grant or
increase any severance or termination pay or supplemental
retirement or post-employment benefit to (or materially amend
any existing arrangement with) any director or executive
officer; increase benefits payable under any existing severance
or termination pay policies or employment agreements; enter into
or materially amend certain agreements with any director or
executive officer; establish, adopt or materially amend any
material bonus, profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement,
deferred compensation, compensation, stock option, restricted
stock or other benefit plan or
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
arrangement covering any director, officer, consultant or
employee; increase, grant or award any compensation, bonus or
other benefits payable to any director or executive officer,
except for merit-based pay increases for 2012 (and, to the
extent based on salary, any corresponding increases in annual
bonus or long term incentive opportunities) granted in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and as
otherwise permitted under the merger agreement; enter into any
third-party contract with respect to a Medco benefit plan having
a term of greater than one year and providing for payments by
Medco having an estimated value of greater than $2,000,000,
other than a contract that is terminable on less than
180 days notice without penalty, a financial renewal, in
the ordinary course of business, of a contract existing as of
the date of the merger agreement, or a contract that does not
increase Medcos annual costs by more than 6% over the cost
of an analogous contract existing on the date of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
execute, adopt, amend or terminate any collective bargaining
contract, except in the ordinary course of business and except
for any action which involves the implementation of a new, or
new participation in, a defined benefit pension plan, retiree
medical plan, multiemployer pension or welfare plan or severance
plan or program;
|
|
|
|
settle, or offer or propose to settle any litigation or other
legal proceeding or dispute for an amount in excess of
$50 million or which would include any non-monetary relief
that would materially affect Medco, its subsidiaries or its
affiliates after the closing date;
|
|
|
|
except as required or permitted by U.S. GAAP or as advised
by Medcos regular public independent accountant, make any
change in financial accounting methods, principles or practices
materially affecting the reported consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations of Medco;
|
|
|
|
authorize or adopt, or publicly propose, a plan or agreement of
complete or partial liquidation or dissolution of Medco or any
of its material subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
outside the ordinary course of Medcos administration of
its tax matters, adopt or change any material method of tax
accounting, make or change any material tax election or file any
amended material tax return;
|
|
|
|
subject to Medcos obligations to use reasonable best
efforts to obtain any consent, authorization, order or approval
of, or any exemption by, any governmental entity which is
required, take any action (or omit to take any action) if such
action (or omission), at the time of such action (or omission),
would reasonably be expected to result in any of the conditions
to the mergers not being satisfied; or
|
|
|
|
agree, resolve or commit to take any of the foregoing summarized
actions.
|
Conduct
of Business by Express Scripts
Express Scripts and New Express Scripts have agreed that, prior
to the completion of the Express Scripts merger, unless Medco
gives its prior written consent or as otherwise expressly
contemplated or permitted by the merger agreement, Express
Scripts and New Express Scripts will, and will cause their
respective subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past
practice; and
|
|
|
|
use reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve intact its
present business organization, (ii) maintain in effect all
necessary foreign, federal, state and local licenses, permits,
consents, franchises, approvals and authorizations,
(iii) keep available the services of its directors,
executive officers and key employees and (iv) maintain
satisfactory relationships with its customers, lenders,
suppliers and others having material business relationships with
it and with governmental entities with jurisdiction over health
care related matters.
|
163
Express Scripts and New Express Scripts have also agreed that,
prior to the completion of the Medco merger, unless Medco gives
its prior written consent, or as expressly contemplated or
permitted by the merger agreement, Express Scripts and New
Express Scripts will not and will not permit any of their
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
amend Express Scripts, New Express Scripts or the
Merger Subs certificates of incorporation, by-laws or
other similar organizational documents (whether by merger,
consolidation or otherwise) in a manner that would adversely
affect the consummation of the mergers or affect the holders of
Medco common stock whose shares may be converted into New
Express Scripts common stock at the effective time of the
Express Scripts merger in a manner different than holders of New
Express Scripts common stock prior to the effective time of the
Express Scripts merger;
|
|
|
|
split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any shares of its
capital stock or declare, set aside for payment or pay any
dividend or distribution, or make any other actual, constructive
or deemed distribution, in respect of any shares of its capital
stock or otherwise make any payments or distributions to its
stockholders in their capacity as such, other than any purchases
made by any Express Scripts benefit plan or trusts for the
benefit of employees of Express Scripts or its employees, in
each case, in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice;
|
|
|
|
enter into any agreement to acquire another business or effect
any transaction that would have any reasonable possibility of
preventing or delaying the closing beyond the outside date (as
it may be extended) or could increase the likelihood of a
failure to satisfy the condition that no order prohibiting the
mergers has been issued by a governmental entity or the
condition that the applicable antitrust waiting periods have
expired or have been terminated and the applicable governmental
approvals have been received;
|
|
|
|
enter into, modify, amend, continue, cancel, renew or terminate
any contract or waive, release or assign any material rights or
claims thereunder, which if so entered into, modified, amended,
terminated, waived, released or assigned would reasonably be
expected to prevent or materially delay or impair the ability of
Express Scripts and its subsidiaries to consummate the mergers
and other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, or
materially impair the ability of Express Scripts and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to conduct their business in
ordinary course consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
except as required or permitted by U.S. GAAP or as advised
by Express Scripts regular public independent accountant,
make any change in financial accounting methods, principles or
practices materially affecting the reported consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations of Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
authorize or adopt, or publicly propose, a plan or agreement of
complete or partial liquidation or dissolution of New Express
Scripts, Express Scripts or any of Express Scripts
material subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
outside the ordinary course of Express Scripts
administration of its tax matters, adopt or change any material
method of tax accounting, make or change any material tax
election or file any amended material tax return;
|
|
|
|
subject to Express Scripts obligations to use reasonable
best efforts to obtain any consent, authorization, order or
approval of, or any exemption by, any governmental entity which
is required, take any action (or omit to take any action) if
such action (or omission), at the time of such action (or
omission), would reasonably be expected to result in any of the
conditions to the mergers not being satisfied; or
|
|
|
|
agree, resolve or commit to take any of the foregoing summarized
actions.
|
No
Solicitation
Each of Medco and Express Scripts has agreed to immediately
cease any discussions or negotiations with any parties that may
have been ongoing with respect to a takeover proposal (as
defined below) and to seek to have returned to the other party
any confidential information that has been provided in any such
discussions or negotiations.
164
Until the earlier of the effective time of the Medco merger or
the date of termination of the merger agreement, each of Medco
and Express Scripts has agreed not to, nor permit any of its
subsidiaries to, nor authorize or permit any of its officers,
directors or employees or any affiliate, investment banker,
financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other representative
retained by it or any of its subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage (including by way of
furnishing information which has not been previously publicly
disclosed), or take any other action designed to facilitate, any
inquiries or the making of any proposal which constitutes, or
may reasonably be expected to lead to, any takeover
proposal; or
|
|
|
|
engage in any discussions or negotiations regarding any takeover
proposal.
|
However, (x) either party may ascertain facts from the
party making such takeover proposal for the purpose of the Medco
board or the Express Scripts board, as applicable, informing
itself about the takeover proposal and the party that made it
and (y) if, prior to obtaining the Medco stockholder
approval (in the case of Medco) or the Express Scripts
stockholder approval (in the case of Express Scripts), following
the receipt of a superior proposal (as defined below) or a
proposal which is reasonably expected to lead to a superior
proposal that in either case was not, directly or indirectly,
solicited, initiated or knowingly encouraged in violation of the
non-solicitation provision described above, the Medco board or
the Express Scripts board, as applicable, determines in good
faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that a
failure to take action with respect to such takeover proposal,
as applicable, would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties
to Medco stockholders or Express Scripts stockholders, as
applicable, under applicable law, Medco or Express Scripts may
in response to such takeover proposal, as applicable, and
subject to compliance with the notification requirements with
respect to any takeover proposal described below:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish information with respect to Medco or Express Scripts, as
applicable, to the party making the takeover proposal pursuant
to a confidentiality agreement that contains provisions not less
favorable to Medco or Express Scripts, as the case may be, than
those contained in the confidentiality agreement between the
parties (excluding certain provisions subsequently added) and
that in any event does not prohibit or restrain the making of a
takeover proposal and, with respect to competitively sensitive
information pursuant to a customary clean-room
arrangement; provided that (1) such confidentiality
agreement may not include any provision calling for an exclusive
right to negotiate with Medco or Express Scripts, as applicable,
and (2) Medco advises Express Scripts or Express Scripts
advises Medco, as applicable, of all nonpublic information
delivered to such person substantially concurrently with its
delivery to the requesting party; and
|
|
|
|
engage in discussions or negotiations with such party regarding
such takeover proposal.
|
Each of Medco and Express Scripts has agreed not to waive or
fail to enforce any provision of any confidentiality or
standstill agreement to which it is a party relating to a
potential or actual takeover proposal.
For purposes of the merger agreement, takeover
proposal means any inquiry, proposal or offer, or a
statement made publicly or to Medco or Express Scripts, as the
case may be, of an intention to make a proposal or offer, from
any person (other than Medco, Express Scripts, New Express
Scripts or their subsidiaries) relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 15% or more of
the consolidated assets (including equity interests in
subsidiaries) of Medco or Express Scripts and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, or 15% or more of any class of equity
securities of Medco or Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
any tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would
result in any person beneficially owning 15% or more of any
class of equity securities of Medco or Express Scripts; or
|
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
recapitalization, extraordinary dividend or self tender offer,
liquidation, dissolution, or similar transaction involving Medco
or Express Scripts or any of their subsidiaries;
|
in each case, other than the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement.
165
For purposes of the merger agreement, superior
proposal means a bona fide written takeover proposal from
any person (other than Medco, Express Scripts and their
subsidiaries) providing for:
|
|
|
|
|
the direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 50% or more of
the consolidated assets (including equity interests in
subsidiaries) of Medco or Express Scripts and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, or 50% or more of any class of equity
securities or voting power of Medco or Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
any tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would
result in any person beneficially owning 50% or more of any
class of equity securities or voting power of Medco or Express
Scripts; or
|
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving Medco or Express Scripts or any of their
subsidiaries;
|
in each case, other than the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement and for which the third-party has demonstrated
that the financing for such offer is fully committed or is
reasonably likely to be obtained, in each case as determined by
the Medco board or the Express Scripts board in its good faith
judgment (after receiving the advice of independent financial
advisors and outside counsel) and which the Medco board or the
Express Scripts board, as applicable, has determined in its good
faith judgment is reasonably likely to be consummated in
accordance with its terms, and, if consummated, would result in
a transaction more favorable to its stockholders from a
financial point of view than the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the merger agreement, but
subject to the non-solicitation obligations described in this
section, prior to receipt of the Medco stockholder approval, the
Medco board may, or, prior to receipt of the Express Scripts
stockholder approval, the Express Scripts board may, in response
to any takeover proposal, (i) withhold, withdraw or modify
or qualify its recommendation, or propose publicly to take any
of the foregoing actions, in a manner adverse to the other
party, the approval, determination of advisability, or
recommendation by the Medco board or the Express Scripts board,
or any committees thereof, as applicable, of the merger
agreement, the mergers and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, (ii) make any other public
statement in connection with the Medco stockholder meeting or
Express Scripts stockholder meeting, as applicable, by or on
behalf of such board that would reasonably be expected to have
the same effect or (iii) approve, determine to be
advisable, or recommend, or propose publicly to approve,
determine to be advisable, or recommend, any takeover proposal
(we collectively refer to clauses (i)-(iii) as an adverse
recommendation change), and terminate the merger agreement in
order to enter into a binding agreement providing for a superior
proposal, if:
|
|
|
|
|
the Medco board or the Express Scripts board, as applicable,
concludes in good faith, after consultation with its outside
financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such takeover
proposal constitutes a superior proposal;
|
|
|
|
such board concludes in good faith, after consultation with its
outside legal counsel, that the failure to make an adverse
recommendation change would be inconsistent with the exercise of
its fiduciary duties to its stockholders under applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
the board effecting the recommendation change, or seeking to
terminate the merger agreement, provides the other party six
business days prior written notice of its intention to
take such action, which notice will include certain information
with respect to such superior proposal as summarized below, as
well as a copy of such takeover proposal;
|
|
|
|
during the six business days following such written notice (or
such shorter period as specified below), the board effecting the
recommendation change and, if requested by the other party, its
representatives have negotiated in good faith with the other
party regarding any revisions to the terms of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement that are proposed by the
other party in response to such superior proposal; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the end of the six business day period described in the
foregoing bullet point, the Medco board or the Express Scripts
board, as applicable, concludes in good faith, after
consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial
advisors (and taking into account any adjustment or modification
of the terms of the merger agreement to which the other party
has agreed in writing), that the takeover
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
proposal continues to be a superior proposal and that the
failure to make an adverse recommendation change would be
inconsistent with the exercise by such board of its fiduciary
duties to its stockholders under applicable laws.
|
Any material amendment or modification to any superior proposal
will be deemed to be a new takeover proposal for purposes of the
non-solicitation obligations summarized in this section;
provided, however, that the notice period and the period during
which the board effecting the recommendation change and its
representatives are required to negotiate in good faith with the
other party regarding any revisions to the terms of the
transactions proposed by the other party in response to such new
takeover proposal pursuant to the previous bullet point will
expire on the later to occur of (i) three business days
after the board effecting the recommendation change provides
written notice of such new takeover proposal to the other party
and (ii) the end of the original six business day period
described above. Each of Medco and Express Scripts, as the case
may be, will be entitled to the benefit of the rights described
in the third and fourth bullets points immediately above no more
than one time with respect to a takeover proposal, including any
material amendments or modifications thereof.
The Medco board or the Express Scripts board, as applicable, may
also effect an adverse recommendation change in circumstances
not involving or relating to a takeover proposal if (and only
if) such board concludes in good faith, after consultation with
its outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action
would be inconsistent with the exercise of its fiduciary duties
to its stockholders under applicable laws.
Additionally, each of Medco and Express Scripts has agreed to
promptly, and in any event no later than
24-hours
after receiving any takeover proposal, advise the other party
orally or in writing of any request for confidential information
in connection with a takeover proposal or of any takeover
proposal, the material terms and conditions of such request or
takeover proposal and the identity of the person making such
request or takeover proposal and will keep the other party
promptly advised of all changes to the material terms of any
takeover proposal. Each of Medco and Express Scripts has agreed
that subject to restrictions under laws applicable to Medco or
Express and their subsidiaries, it will, prior to or concurrent
with the time it is provided to any third parties, provide to
the other party any non-public information concerning Medco or
Express Scripts and their subsidiaries that Medco or Express
Scripts provided to any third party in connection with any
takeover proposal which was not previously provided to the other
party.
Nothing contained in the merger agreement will prohibit the
Medco board or the Express Scripts board from (i) taking
and disclosing to their stockholders a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act or making a statement
contemplated by Item 1012(a) of
Regulation M-A
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act, (ii) making any
disclosure to their stockholders if the Medco board or Express
Scripts board determines in good faith, after consultation with
its outside counsel, that the failure to make such disclosure
would be inconsistent with its duties to the stockholders of
Medco or Express Scripts under applicable laws; or
(iii) making accurate disclosure to their stockholders of
factual information regarding the business, financial condition
or results of operations of Express Scripts or Medco or the fact
that a takeover proposal has been made, the identity of the
party making such proposal or the material terms of such
proposal (and such disclosure will not be deemed to be an
adverse recommendation change), so long as (A) any such
disclosure includes the Express Scripts recommendation or the
Medco recommendation, as applicable, without any modification or
qualification thereof or continues the prior recommendation of
the Express Scripts board or Medco board, as the case may be,
and (B) does not contain an express adverse recommendation
change (without giving effect to clause (ii) of the
definition of adverse recommendation change set forth above) or
any other statements by or on behalf of the board of such party
which would reasonably be expected to have the same effect as an
adverse recommendation change.
Stockholder
Meetings and Duty to Recommend
The merger agreement requires each of Medco and Express Scripts
to, as soon as practicable following effectiveness of the
Form S-4,
duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its
stockholders for the purpose of seeking stockholder approval of
the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement. If the applicable partys board has not
made an adverse recommendation change, such party will
167
recommend that its stockholders adopt the merger agreement,
include such recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and use its reasonable best efforts to
(i) solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the
adoption of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and (ii) take all
other action necessary or advisable to secure stockholder
approval. Except as expressly permitted under the
non-solicitation provisions described above, neither the Medco
board nor the Express Scripts board, or any committees thereof,
may make an adverse recommendation change. The parties have
agreed that notwithstanding any adverse recommendation change,
unless the merger agreement is terminated in accordance with its
terms, the obligations of the parties under the merger agreement
will continue in full force and effect.
Reasonable
Best Efforts
Each of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and Medco has
agreed to, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries to, use
reasonable best efforts (i) to take, or cause to be taken,
all actions necessary, proper or advisable to comply promptly
with all legal requirements which may be imposed on such party
or its subsidiaries with respect to the mergers and, subject to
the conditions to the mergers, to consummate the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement as promptly as practicable
and (ii) to obtain (and to cooperate with the other party
to obtain) any consent, authorization, order or approval of, or
any exemption by, any governmental entity and any other third
party which is required to be obtained by Medco, New Express
Scripts or Express Scripts or any of their respective
subsidiaries in connection with the mergers and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and to comply
with the terms and conditions of any such consent,
authorization, order or approval. These approvals include
approval under, or notices pursuant to, the HSR Act and certain
approvals from, and making filings with, the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain state
insurance departments relating to Express Scripts and
Medcos insurance company subsidiaries.
Each of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and Medco has
agreed to use reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all actions necessary, proper or advisable to consummate
and make effective, as soon as practicable after the date of the
merger agreement, the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including using reasonable best efforts to lift or
rescind any injunction or restraining order or other order
adversely affecting the ability of the parties to consummate
such transactions and using reasonable best efforts to defend
any litigation seeking to enjoin, prevent or delay the
consummation of such transactions or seeking material damages.
Governmental
Approvals
Medco and Express Scripts each filed a Notification and Report
Form pursuant to the HSR Act with respect to the Medco merger on
August 3, 2011. Each of Medco and Express Scripts has
agreed to (i) supply as promptly as practicable any
additional information and documentary material that may be
requested pursuant to the HSR Act and use its reasonable best
efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all other actions
consistent with its obligations to use reasonable best efforts
to obtain any consent, authorization, order or approval of, or
any exemption by, any governmental entity necessary to cause the
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods
under the HSR Act (including any extensions thereof) as soon as
practicable and (ii) use its reasonable best efforts to
(A) take all action reasonably necessary to ensure that no
state takeover statute or similar law is or becomes applicable
to any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
and (B) if any state takeover statute or similar law
becomes applicable to any of such transactions, take all action
reasonable to enable such transactions to be consummated as
promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by the merger
agreement and otherwise minimize the effect of such law on such
transactions.
Additionally, each of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and
Medco has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to
(i) cooperate in all respects with each other in connection
with any filing or submission with a governmental entity in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and in connection with any investigation or other
inquiry by or before a governmental entity relating to such
transactions, including any governmental inquiry, investigation
or proceeding initiated by a private party and
168
(ii) keep the other party informed in all material respects
and on a reasonably timely basis of any communication received
by such party from, or given by such party to, the Federal Trade
Commission, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice
or any other governmental entity and of any communication
received or given by a private party in connection with any
governmental inquiry, investigation or proceeding, in each case
regarding any of such transactions.
The parties to the merger agreement have agreed that each party
will have the right to review in advance, and to the extent
practicable each will consult the other on, all the information
relating to the other parties and their respective subsidiaries
that appears in any filing made with, or written materials
submitted to, any third party
and/or any
governmental entity in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
The parties have agreed that in no event will Express Scripts or
New Express Scripts or their subsidiaries or affiliates be
required to agree to (nor will Medco and its subsidiaries be
permitted to agree unless Express Scripts so directs them (and
they will, if Express Scripts so directs, agree to, so long as
such agreements are conditioned upon the closing))
(i) divest, license, hold separate or otherwise dispose of,
or allow a third party to utilize, any portion of its or their
respective businesses, assets or contracts or (ii) take any
other action that may be required or requested by any
governmental entity in connection with obtaining the consents,
authorizations, orders or approvals contemplated by the merger
agreement that would have an adverse impact, in any material
respect, on the business of Express Scripts, New Express
Scripts, Medco or their respective subsidiaries. However,
Express Scripts has agreed, conditioned on the closing of the
mergers, to the extent necessary to ensure satisfaction of
certain conditions to the closing relating to regulatory
approvals on or prior to the outside date (as it may be
extended), to:
|
|
|
|
|
the divestiture or disposition of one mail order dispensing
facility of Express Scripts, Medco or any of their respective
subsidiaries, provided that it is not the Express Scripts
facility located in St. Louis, Missouri;
|
|
|
|
the divestiture or disposition of the property, plant and
equipment associated with specialty pharmacy dispensing or
infusion facilities of Express Scripts, Medco or any of their
respective subsidiaries having a net book value not in excess of
$30 million in the aggregate, provided that it not include
the property, plant or equipment at the Express Scripts facility
located in Indianapolis, Indiana; and
|
|
|
|
the divestiture, disposition, termination, expiration,
assignment, delegation, novation or transfer of contracts of
Express Scripts, Medco or their respective subsidiaries which
generated, collectively, EBITDA not in excess of
$115 million during the most recently available 12 calendar
month period ending on the applicable date of such agreement;
provided, that in the case of pharmacy benefits management
customer contracts of Express Scripts, Medco or their respective
subsidiaries, the aggregate annual number of adjusted
prescription drug claims subject to the foregoing obligation
will not exceed 35 million.
|
While the parties have agreed, under certain circumstances, to
take the actions set forth in the paragraph above pursuant to
the merger agreement, the parties may also elect to take other
actions. Express Scripts, after prior consultation with Medco to
the extent practicable, shall have the principal responsibility
for devising and implementing the strategy for obtaining any
necessary antitrust or competition clearances, and shall take
the lead in all meetings and communications with any
governmental entity in connection with obtaining any necessary
antitrust or competition clearances. The parties have also
agreed that, as between Express Scripts and Medco, the
determination of how any of the actions specified in the three
bullet points above will be implemented will be made by Express
Scripts.
Employee
Benefits
From the effective time of the Medco merger through
December 31, 2012, Express Scripts has agreed to provide
(i) to each employee of Medco and its subsidiaries, which
we refer to as a covered employee, base salary, target bonus
opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities that are, in
each case, no less than the base salary, target bonus
opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities (other than
opportunities under an
169
employee stock purchase plan) applicable to each such covered
employee immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger and (ii) employee benefits (other than severance
benefits and benefits under an employee stock purchase plan)
that are no less favorable, in the aggregate, than the employee
benefits provided to covered employees immediately prior to the
effective time of the Medco merger. From the effective time of
the Medco merger and continuing through the first anniversary of
the effective time of the Medco merger, Express Scripts will
provide severance benefits to each covered employee that are
equal to the severance benefits provided to covered employees
under Medco benefit plans immediately prior to the effective
time of the Medco merger.
Following the consummation of the mergers, New Express Scripts
will, or will cause Express Scripts and its affiliates and any
successors thereto to, assume, honor, fulfill and discharge
Medcos and its subsidiaries obligations under
certain specified employee benefit plans and agreements.
As of the effective times of the mergers, Express Scripts has
agreed to cause its and Medcos third party insurance
providers or third party administrators to waive all limitations
as to any pre-existing condition or waiting periods in its
applicable welfare plans with respect to participation and
coverage requirements applicable to the covered employees under
any welfare plans that such employees may be eligible to
participate in after such effective times, other than
limitations or waiting periods that are already in effect with
respect to such employees and that have not been satisfied under
any comparable employee benefit plan. In addition, covered
employees will be eligible to participate in the Express Scripts
Employee Stock Purchase Plan on the same terms and conditions as
similarly situated employees of New Express Scripts, Express
Scripts and their respective affiliates. Express Scripts has
also agreed that New Express Scripts will, and will cause
Express Scripts and Medco to, give covered employees full credit
for purposes of eligibility, vesting and level of benefits
(including for purposes of paid time off, severance and
short-term disability benefits, but not for benefit accrual
purposes under any defined benefit pension plan) under any
employee benefit and compensation plans or arrangements
maintained by New Express Scripts or any of its affiliates for
such covered employees service with Express Scripts, Medco
or any of their respective affiliates.
The parties have agreed that Medco will (i) finally and
conclusively determine, in good faith, the amounts earned, based
on maximum funding, under the Medco Annual Incentive Plan and
Medco Executive Annual Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the
bonus plans, in respect of the 2011 fiscal year, and pay such
bonus amounts in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, but no later than the closing date and
(ii) in consultation with Express Scripts, establish annual
bonus targets, maximums and performance award levels,
performance measures and eligibility and participation
requirements for the 2012 fiscal year under the bonus plans, in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice.
If the closing date occurs on or after January 1, 2012, the
parties have agreed that Medco, in consultation with Express
Scripts, (i) will be permitted to fully fund 2012
incentive pools under the bonus plans based on the most recent
forecast available at that time, pro rata through the closing
date and (ii) pay out such 2012 bonus amounts to eligible
employees upon the closing date. For the balance of the 2012
calendar year following the closing date, New Express Scripts
will, or will cause Express Scripts or its affiliates to,
provide bonus opportunities under a new program, based on the
eligibility and participation requirements in effect under the
bonus plans immediately prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger, and based on performance metrics and funding to be
determined by New Express Scripts.
New Express Scripts has also acknowledged that a change in
control, change of control or term of similar
import will occur upon the effective time of the Medco merger
for the purposes of each Medco benefit plan.
Financing
New Express Scripts, Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have
agreed that they will have sufficient funds available to satisfy
all of their respective obligations under the merger agreement
at the time when they are otherwise obligated to consummate the
mergers.
Unless, and to the extent, Express Scripts, New Express Scripts
or the Merger Subs have sufficient cash from other sources
available to satisfy their obligations under the merger
agreement, Express Scripts, New
170
Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have agreed to use
reasonable best efforts to arrange the financing for the merger
on the terms and conditions described in the debt commitment
letter and will not permit any amendment or modification to be
made to, any replacement of all or any portion of any facilities
(or commitments thereof) described in, or any waiver of any
provision or remedy under, the debt commitment letter, if such
amendment, modification, replacement or waiver:
|
|
|
|
|
reduces the aggregate amount of the financing; or
|
|
|
|
imposes new or additional conditions or otherwise expands,
amends or modifies any of the conditions to the receipt of any
portion of the financing in a manner that would or would
reasonably be expected to (i) delay or prevent the closing,
(ii) make the funding of the financing materially less
likely to occur or (iii) adversely impact the ability of
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts or the Merger Subs to
enforce their rights against other parties to the debt
commitment letter or the definitive agreements with respect to
the financing, in any material respect.
|
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs may
amend, supplement, modify or replace the debt commitment letter
(i) to add or replace lenders, lead arrangers, bookrunners,
syndication agents or similar entities, (ii) to increase
the amount of indebtedness and (iii) to replace all or a
portion of the facility committed under the debt commitment
letter with one or more new facilities, which we refer to as a
replacement facility, in a manner not materially less beneficial
to Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs,
provided that any amendments, modifications or replacements of
any replacement facility will be subject to the same limitations
that apply to the debt commitment letter as described above.
Unless, and to the extent, Express Scripts, New Express Scripts
or the Merger Subs have sufficient cash from other sources
available to satisfy their obligations under the merger
agreement, each of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts or the
Merger Subs have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain in effect the debt commitment letter until the mergers
are consummated;
|
|
|
|
negotiate and enter into definitive agreements with respect to
the financing for the mergers on the terms and conditions
contained in the debt commitment letter or on other terms not
materially less favorable to Express Scripts, New Express
Scripts and the Merger Subs, in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
timely satisfy all conditions to funding in the debt commitment
letter that are within its control and consummate the financing
for the mergers at or prior to the closing;
|
|
|
|
enforce their rights under the debt commitment letter in the
event of a breach or other failure to fund the financing
required to consummate the mergers on the closing date by the
lenders; and
|
|
|
|
comply in all material respects with its covenants and other
obligations under the debt commitment letter.
|
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have
agreed to give Medco reasonably prompt notice: (i) of any
material breach or default by any party to the debt commitment
letter or definitive document related to the financing;
(ii) of the receipt of any written notice from any
financing source regarding any breach, default, termination or
repudiation by any party to the debt commitment letter or any
definitive document related to the financing and (iii) if
for any reason Express Scripts, New Express Scripts or the
Merger Subs believe that they will not be able to obtain all or
any portion of the financing required to consummate the mergers.
Express Scripts has agreed to promptly notify Medco of the
receipt of any notice from any lender withdrawing, terminating
or reducing the aggregate amount of financing contemplated by
the debt commitment letter. Express Scripts, New Express Scripts
and the Merger Subs have agreed to use their reasonable best
efforts to complete the financing to the extent necessary to
consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Unless, and to the extent, Express Scripts, New Express Scripts
or the Merger Subs have sufficient cash from other sources
available to satisfy their obligations under the merger
agreement, if any portion of the financing for the mergers
becomes unavailable on the terms and conditions contemplated in
the debt commitment letter, Express Scripts, New Express Scripts
and the Merger Subs have agreed to use their
171
respective reasonable best efforts to arrange alternative debt
financing in an amount sufficient to consummate the mergers.
However, Express Scripts is not required to obtain financing
which includes terms and conditions materially less favorable to
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs,
relative to those terms and conditions being replaced.
Medco has agreed to, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries
to, and has agreed to use reasonable best efforts to cause its
and their representatives to, provide all reasonable cooperation
requested by Express Scripts in connection with (i) the
arrangement of financing for the mergers and (ii) any
refinancing of existing indebtedness of Express Scripts,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
promptly providing the financing sources with all financial
information regarding Medco and its subsidiaries required to be
delivered pursuant to certain provisions in the debt commitment
letter or other information as is reasonably requested by
Express Scripts or the financing sources or their respective
agents to prepare customary bank information memoranda, lender
presentations, offering memoranda, private placement memoranda,
registration statements and prospectuses under the Securities
Act;
|
|
|
|
participating in a reasonable number of meetings, due diligence
sessions, presentations, road shows, drafting
sessions and sessions with the rating agencies;
|
|
|
|
reasonably cooperating with the financing sources and
their respective agents due diligence, to the extent not
unreasonably interfering with the business of Medco;
|
|
|
|
reasonably cooperating with the marketing efforts for any
portion of such financing and or refinancing;
|
|
|
|
reasonably cooperating with Express Scripts preparation of
bank information memoranda, prospectuses and similar documents,
rating agency presentations, road show presentations and written
offering materials, to the extent information contained therein
related to the business of Medco and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
using reasonable best efforts to cause its certified independent
auditors to provide (A) consent to SEC filings and offering
memoranda that include or incorporate Medcos consolidated
financial information and their reports thereon, auditors
reports and comfort letters in customary form and (B) other
documentation (including reasonable assistance in the
preparation of pro forma financial statements by New Express
Scripts
and/or
Express Scripts) with assumptions underlying the pro forma
adjustments being the responsibility of Express Scripts
and/or New
Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
subject to the actual occurrence of closing, providing customary
certificates, legal opinions of internal counsel or other
customary closing documents as may be reasonably requested by
New Express Scripts
and/or
Express Scripts or the financing sources;
|
|
|
|
subject to the actual occurrence of closing, entering into one
or more credit or other agreements on terms satisfactory to
Express Scripts in connection with the financing immediately
prior to (but not effective until) the effective times of the
mergers;
|
|
|
|
subject to the actual occurrence of closing, taking all actions
reasonably necessary in connection with the pay off of existing
indebtedness of Medco and its subsidiaries on the closing date
and the release of related liens on the closing date; and
|
|
|
|
subject to the actual occurrence of closing, executing and
delivering any pledge and security documents or other definitive
financing documents reasonably requested by New Express Scripts
and/or
Express Scripts or the financing sources; provided, however,
that no obligation of Medco or any of its subsidiaries under any
such agreement or instrument will be effective until the
effective times of the mergers and, none of Medco or any of its
subsidiaries will be responsible for any cost, commitment or
other similar fee or incur any other liability in connection
with the financing or any refinancing prior to the effective
times of the mergers.
|
Express Scripts has agreed to keep confidential all non-public
or confidential information provided by Medco or any of its
representatives in connection with the financing, except Express
Scripts and New Express
172
Scripts may disclose such information to potential financing
sources and to rating agencies during the syndication and
marketing periods, subject to customary confidentiality
undertaking by such potential financing sources.
Express Scripts and New Express Scripts have agreed to promptly
indemnify and exculpate Medco, its subsidiaries and their
respective representatives against any liabilities incurred in
connection with claims asserted by financing sources in
connection with the arrangement of the financing or refinancing,
including any information used in connection such financing or
refinancing (other than information relating to Medco or its
subsidiaries provided to Express Scripts in writing on behalf of
Medco, its subsidiaries or its and their representatives
expressly for use in connection with the financing or
refinancing).
Indemnification
and Insurance
After the effective times of the mergers, New Express Scripts
has agreed to, and has agreed to cause Medco and Express Scripts
to, indemnify, defend, hold harmless and advance expenses to
(provided the person to whom expenses are advances provides an
undertaking to repay the advance if it is ultimately determined
that such person is not entitled to indemnification), each
present and former director and officer of Medco, Express
Scripts and their respective subsidiaries and each of their
employees who serves as a fiduciary of a Medco benefit plan or
Express Scripts benefit plan against any costs, expenses, losses
or liabilities arising out of matters existing or occurring at
or prior to the effective times of the mergers, including the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
New Express Scripts has also agreed to continue all rights to
exculpation, indemnification or advancement of expenses arising
from acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective times of
the mergers provided for in the certificates of incorporation,
by-laws or other organizational documents of Express Scripts and
Medco in favor of the current or former directors or officers of
Express Scripts or Medco or any of their respective subsidiaries
and each of their respective employees who serves as a fiduciary
of a Medco benefit plan or an Express Scripts benefit plan.
For six years after the mergers, New Express Scripts will cause
Medco and Express Scripts to, and the surviving corporations
will, maintain in effect the exculpation, indemnification and
advancement of expenses provisions of the applicable
partys certificate of incorporation and by-laws or similar
organization documents in effect as of the date of the merger
agreement or in any contract of the applicable party or its
subsidiaries with any of their directors, officers or employees
in effect on the date of the merger agreement, and will not
amend, repeal or modify such provisions in any manner that would
adversely affect the rights of any individuals who are entitled
to such rights.
Prior to the effective time of the Medco merger, Medco may
purchase directors and officers liability insurance
and fiduciary liability insurance with a claims period of no
more than six years from and after the effective time of the
Medco merger and benefits and levels of coverage not materially
more favorable than Medcos existing policies for matters
existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the
Medco merger; provided, that the cost of such policies may not
exceed a specified amount. If such policies are obtained, New
Express Scripts will, and will cause Medco after the Medco
merger to, maintain such policies. If such policies have not
been obtained as of the effective time of the Medco merger, New
Express Scripts will, and will cause the surviving corporations
to, maintain, for six years after the effective times of the
mergers, directors and officers liability insurance
and fiduciary liability insurance that is not materially less
favorable to the current and former directors and officers of
Medco and Express Scripts than each partys existing
policy. New Express Scripts will not be obligated to pay an
annual premium in an amount greater than 300% of Medcos
policy in existence on the date of the merger agreement. The
parties agreed that in the event such coverage is unavailable,
New Express Scripts and the surviving corporations will be
obligated to obtain the best available coverage.
173
Conditions
to the Merger
Conditions
to Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and
Medcos Obligations to Complete the Merger
The obligations of Express Scripts, Express Scripts Merger Sub
and New Express Scripts to consummate the Express Scripts merger
and of Medco, Medco Merger Sub and New Express Scripts to
consummate the Medco merger are subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of various conditions (which may be waived, to the extent
permitted by law, by Express Scripts or New Express Scripts, as
the case may be, on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, and
Medco) that include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Medco has obtained the Medco stockholder approval, and Express
Scripts has obtained the Express Scripts stockholder approval;
|
|
|
|
the shares of New Express Scripts common stock issuable to
Medcos stockholders and Express Scripts stockholders
pursuant to the merger agreement have been approved for listing
on the NASDAQ subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
no order has been promulgated, entered, enforced, enacted or
issued or is applicable to the mergers or other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement by any governmental entity
which prohibits, restrains or makes illegal the consummation of
the mergers or other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and continues in effect;
|
|
|
|
effectiveness of the registration statement for the New Express
Scripts common stock being issued in the mergers (of which this
joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part) and the absence
of any stop order suspending such effectiveness; and
|
|
|
|
(i) the waiting period (and any extensions thereof) under
the HSR Act applicable to the mergers has expired or been
terminated, certain approvals from the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain state
insurance departments relating to Express Scripts and
Medcos insurance company subsidiaries have been obtained
and are in effect, and (ii) all material filings with the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain
state insurance departments relating to Express Scripts
and Medcos insurance company subsidiaries have been made.
We refer collectively to the matters addressed in the foregoing
clauses (i) and (ii) as the required governmental
consents. This condition shall be deemed to be satisfied,
insofar as the approvals from and filings with the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services and certain state
insurance departments are concerned, if not earlier satisfied,
on the fifth business day prior to the outside date, without
giving effect to any extension thereof.
|
Conditions
to Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the
Merger Subs Obligation to Complete the
Merger
The obligations of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and
Express Scripts Merger Sub to consummate the Express Scripts
merger and of New Express Scripts and Medco Merger Sub to
consummate the Medco merger are subject to the satisfaction on
or prior to the closing date of the following conditions (which
may be waived in whole or in part by Express Scripts or New
Express Scripts, as the case may be, on behalf of itself and
such other entities):
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Medco set forth in the
merger agreement with respect to (i) the due organization
of Medco and its subsidiaries (but, with respect to Medcos
subsidiaries, solely with respect to those subsidiaries which
are material to the business of Medco and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole), (ii) capitalization of Medco and its
subsidiaries (except to the extent that any inaccuracies would
be immaterial, in the aggregate), (iii) due authorization,
(iv) the absence of any conflicts with Medcos or its
subsidiaries organizational documents, (v) the
absence of a Medco material adverse effect since
December 25, 2010 and (vi) the opinions of
Medcos financial advisors, in each case, are true and
correct in all respects as of the date of the merger agreement
and as of the closing date as though made on or as of such date
(or, in the case of representations and warranties that address
matters only as of a particular date, as of such date);
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
all other representations and warranties of Medco set forth in
the merger agreement are true and correct in all respects
(without giving effect to any materiality or Medco material
adverse effect qualifier in such representation or warranty), as
of the date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date
(or, in the case of representations and warranties that address
matters only as of a particular date, as of such date), except
to the extent that breaches of such representations or
warranties, individually or in the aggregate, have not had, and
would not reasonably be expected to have a Medco material
adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have
received a certificate validly executed and signed on behalf of
Medco by its chief executive officer and chief financial officer
certifying that the two conditions above have been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
Medco has performed or complied with all of the obligations,
agreements and covenants (other than certain notification
obligations) required by the merger agreement to be performed or
complied with by it in all material respects and Express
Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have received a
certificate validly executed and signed on behalf of Medco by
its chief executive officer and chief financial officer
certifying that this condition has been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
New Express Scripts has received the opinion of Skadden, in form
and substance reasonably satisfactory to New Express Scripts,
dated as of the closing date to the effect that the receipt by
the holders of the shares of Express Scripts common stock of New
Express Scripts common stock in exchange for Express Scripts
common stock pursuant to the Express Scripts merger, taken
together with the receipt by the holders of the shares of Medco
common stock of the New Express Scripts common stock in exchange
for Medco common stock pursuant to the Medco merger, will
qualify for federal income tax purposes as an
exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of
the Code; and
|
|
|
|
there is (i) no legal proceeding pending in a United States
District Court commenced by a governmental entity seeking an
order that would prohibit, restrain or make illegal the
consummation of the mergers or the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement under the
U.S. antitrust laws, (ii) no motion of a governmental
entity pending in a United States Court of Appeals, seeking on
an expedited basis, appeal, review, rehearing or
reconsideration, which we refer to as an expedited appeal, of
the matters set forth in clause (i) that has been granted
by such United States Court of Appeals, (iii) no request or
petition for an expedited appeal that has been made or filed by
any governmental entity and (iv) all deadlines for the
making or filing of any such request or petition that may be
specified by any statute, regulation, court order or guideline
have passed without any request or petition for such expedited
appeal having been made or filed by such governmental entity,
except, in the case of clauses (iii) and (iv), to the
extent any such request or petition has been subsequently
denied; provided, that, from and after the fifth business day
preceding the outside date (as it may be extended),
clauses (iii) and (iv) cease to be conditions for any
purpose.
|
Conditions
to Medcos Obligation to Complete the Merger
The obligation of Medco to consummate the Medco merger is
subject to the satisfaction on or prior to the closing date of
the following conditions (which may be waived in whole or in
part by Medco):
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Express Scripts set forth
in the merger agreement with respect to (i) the due
organization of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the
Merger Subs, (ii) capitalization of Express Scripts and its
subsidiaries (except to the extent that any inaccuracies would
be immaterial, in the aggregate), (iii) due authorization,
(iv) the absence of any conflicts with Express
Scripts or its subsidiaries organizational
documents, (v) the absence of an Express Scripts material
adverse effect since December 25, 2010 and (vi) the
opinions of Express Scripts financial advisors, in each
case, are true and correct in all respects as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the closing date as though made on or
as of such date (or, in the case of representations and
warranties that address matters only as of a particular date, as
of such date);
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
all other representations and warranties of Express Scripts, New
Express Scripts and the Merger Subs set forth in the merger
agreement are true and correct in all respects (without giving
effect to any materiality or Express Scripts material adverse
effect qualifier in such representation or warranty), as of the
date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date as
though made on or as of such date (or, in the case of
representations and warranties that address matters only as of a
particular date, as of such date), except to the extent that
breaches of such representations or warranties, individually or
in the aggregate, have not had, and would not reasonably be
expected to have an Express Scripts material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
Medco has received a certificate validly executed and signed on
behalf of Express Scripts by its chief executive officer and
chief financial officer certifying that the two conditions above
have been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs have
performed or complied with, as applicable, all of the
obligations, agreements and covenants (other than certain
notification obligations) required by the merger agreement to be
performed or complied with by each of them in all material
respects and Medco has received a certificate validly executed
and signed on behalf of Express Scripts by its chief executive
officer and chief financial officer certifying that this
condition has been satisfied; and
|
|
|
|
Medco has received the opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell,
counsel to Medco, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory
to Medco, dated as of the closing date to the effect that the
receipt by the holders of the shares of Medco common stock of
New Express Scripts common stock in exchange for Medco common
stock pursuant to the Medco merger, taken together with the
receipt by the holders of the shares of Express Scripts common
stock of New Express Scripts common stock in exchange for
Express Scripts common stock pursuant to the Express Scripts
merger, will qualify for federal income tax purposes as an
exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of
the Code.
|
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated and the mergers may be
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the Medco
merger, whether before or after the Medco stockholder approval
and/or the
Express Scripts stockholder approval:
|
|
|
|
|
by the mutual written consent of Express Scripts and Medco;
|
|
|
|
by either of Medco or Express Scripts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued
an order permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the mergers and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement and such order has become final and
non-appealable.
|
|
|
|
if the mergers and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement have not been consummated by April 20,
2012; provided, however, that if the conditions relating to
(i) the absence of any order of a governmental entity
prohibiting the mergers, (ii) obtaining the required
governmental consents and (iii) the absence of legal
proceedings seeking to prohibit the mergers have not been
satisfied (or deemed satisfied) or waived by all parties
entitled to the benefit of such condition by the fifth business
day prior to April 20, 2012, either Express Scripts or
Medco may, by written notice delivered to the other party,
extend the outside date from time to time to a date not later
than July 20, 2012, and if such conditions have not been
satisfied (or deemed satisfied) or waived by all parties
entitled to the benefit of such condition by the fifth business
day prior to July 20, 2012, either Express Scripts or Medco
may, by written notice delivered to the other, extend the
outside date from time to time to a date not later than
October 22, 2012. This right of termination is not
available to a party if its action or failure to act constitutes
a material breach or violation of its covenants, agreements or
other obligations under the merger agreement and such material
breach or violation is the principal cause of or directly
resulted in (x) the failure to satisfy the conditions to
the obligations of the terminating party to consummate the
merger prior to the outside date (as it may be extended) or
(y) the failure of the closing to occur by the outside date
(as it may be extended).
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
if the Express Scripts stockholder approval has not been
obtained upon a vote taken at the duly convened Express Scripts
special meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of such
meeting.
|
|
|
|
if the Medco stockholder approval has not been obtained upon a
vote taken at the duly convened Medco special meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of such meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (i) the Express Scripts board or any committee thereof
makes, prior to the Express Scripts special meeting, an adverse
recommendation change, (ii) the Express Scripts board or
any committee fails to include the Express Scripts
recommendation in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
(iii) a tender offer or exchange offer is commenced and the
Express Scripts board fails to recommend against acceptance of
such tender offer or exchange offer by Express Scripts
stockholders (including by taking any position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2
of the Exchange Act other than recommending rejection of such
tender offer or exchange offer) within 10 business days of the
commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer,
(iv) the Express Scripts board or any committee refuses to
affirm publicly the Express Scripts recommendation following any
reasonable written request by Medco to provide such
reaffirmation (including in the event of a takeover proposal
(other than pursuant to a commenced tender offer or exchange
offer) having been publicly disclosed) prior to the earlier of
(x) 10 calendar days following such request and
(y) five business days prior to the Express Scripts special
meeting (provided, in the case of clause (y), that if such
request is made less than eight business days prior to such
meeting, then, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Express
Scripts board or any committee shall have four business days to
respond to such request for reaffirmation); provided, that a
request for affirmation may only be made if there are events or
developments that in the reasonable judgment of Medco call into
question whether the Express Scripts stockholder approval will
be obtained or (v) the Express Scripts board formally
resolves to take or publicly announces an intention to take any
of the foregoing summarized actions; provided, that the right to
terminate pursuant to clauses (i) through (v) which
arises following the commencement or announcement of a takeover
proposal will expire if not exercised prior to the
10th business day following the date on which the right to
terminate under these circumstances first arose; provided,
further, that the foregoing proviso does not apply for purposes
of the termination fee and expense reimbursement provisions of
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder
approval, if Express Scripts is in willful breach of its
obligation to make and not withdraw the Express Scripts
recommendation or its non-solicitation obligations;
|
|
|
|
if Express Scripts breaches or fails to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth
in the merger agreement, and such breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a closing condition
regarding the accuracy of Express Scripts representations
and warranties or Express Scripts compliance with its
covenants and agreements and (ii) is incapable of being
cured by Express Scripts by the outside date (as it may be
extended); or
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Medco stockholder approval, so that
Medco may enter into a definitive agreement providing for a
superior proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (i) the Medco board or any committee thereof makes,
prior to the Medco special meeting, an adverse recommendation
change, (ii) the Medco board or any committee fails to
include the Medco recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, (iii) a tender offer or exchange
offer is commenced and the Medco board fails to recommend
against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by
Medco stockholders (including, for these purposes, by taking any
position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2
of the Exchange Act other than recommending rejection of such
tender offer or exchange offer) within 10 business days of the
commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer,
(iv) the Medco board or any committee refuses to affirm
publicly the Medco recommendation following any reasonable
written request by Express Scripts to provide such
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
reaffirmation (including in the event of a takeover proposal
(other than pursuant to a commenced tender offer or exchange
offer) having been publicly disclosed) prior to the earlier of
(x) 10 calendar days following such request and
(y) five business days prior to the Medco special meeting
(provided, in the case of clause (y), that if such request is
made less than eight business days prior to such meeting, then,
notwithstanding the foregoing, the Medco board or any committee
shall have four business days to respond to such request for
reaffirmation); provided, that a request for affirmation may
only be made if there are events or developments that in the
reasonable judgment of Medco call into question whether the
Express Scripts stockholder approval will be obtained or
(v) the Medco board formally resolves to take or publicly
announces an intention to take any of the foregoing summarized
actions; provided, that the right to terminate the merger
agreement pursuant to clauses (i) through (v) which
arises following the commencement or announcement of a takeover
proposal will expire if not exercised prior to the
10th business day following the date on which a right to
terminate under these circumstances first arose; provided,
further, that the foregoing proviso does not apply for purposes
of the termination fee and expense reimbursement provisions of
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Medco stockholder approval, if Medco
is in willful breach of its obligation to make and not withdraw
the Medco recommendation or its non-solicitation obligations;
|
|
|
|
if Medco breaches or fails to perform any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set forth
in the merger agreement, and such breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a closing condition
regarding the accuracy of Medcos representations and
warranties or Medcos compliance with its covenants and
agreements and (ii) is incapable of being cured by Medco by
the outside date (as it may be extended); or
|
|
|
|
prior to the receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder
approval, so that Express Scripts may enter into a definitive
agreement providing for a superior proposal.
|
Effect of
Termination
If the merger agreement is terminated as described in
Termination above, the merger agreement
will be void and have no effect, without any liability or
obligation on the part of any party, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
no termination will affect the obligations of the parties
contained in the confidentiality agreement;
|
|
|
|
no termination will relieve any party from liability for any
fraud, willful breach of a representation or warranty or willful
breach of any covenant or other agreement contained in the
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
certain other provisions of the merger agreement, including
(i) provisions with respect to the ability of Express
Scripts and Medco to pursue damages against the other party for
a willful breach of the merger agreement and
(ii) provisions with respect to the allocation of fees and
expenses, including, if applicable, the termination fees and
expense reimbursements described below, will survive termination.
|
Termination
Fees; Expenses
All fees and expenses incurred by the parties are to be paid
solely by the party that has incurred such fees and expenses
except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the parties have agreed to share equally (i) the filing fee
under the HSR Act and any fees for similar filings under foreign
laws, (ii) the expenses in connection with printing and
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus, (iii) all
SEC filing fees paid or payable relating to the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
in the event that the merger agreement is terminated due to a
failure to obtain the Express Scripts stockholder approval at
the Express Scripts special meeting, or any adjournment or
postponement thereof, Express Scripts will pay to Medco, by wire
transfer of same day funds on the date of such termination, all
documented, out of pocket expenses of Medco (including financing
expenses) not to exceed $225 million; and
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
in the event that the merger agreement is terminated due to a
failure to obtain the Medco stockholder approval at the Medco
special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof,
Medco will pay to Express Scripts, by wire transfer of same day
funds on the date of such termination, all documented, out of
pocket expenses of Express Scripts (including financing
expenses) not to exceed $225 million.
|
The merger agreement contains certain termination rights for
Express Scripts and provides that Medco will pay Express Scripts
a cash termination fee of $650 million by wire transfer of
same-day
funds on the date of termination of the merger agreement under
specified circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Express Scripts, or at the
time of termination could have been terminated by Express
Scripts for: (i) an adverse recommendation change made by
the Medco board or any committee thereof prior to the Medco
special meeting, (ii) a failure by Medco to include the
Medco recommendation in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
(iii) a failure by the Medco board to recommend against
acceptance by its stockholders of a tender offer or exchange
offer, (iv) a failure by the Medco board to affirm the
Medco recommendation upon any reasonable written request by
Express Scripts or (v) or a formal resolution by the Medco
board to take or a public announcement of an intention to take
any of the foregoing summarized actions; provided that for each
of the foregoing clauses (i)-(v), in the event that there was no
takeover proposal outstanding with respect to Medco at the time
of the event giving rise to Express Scripts right to
terminate the merger agreement, the termination fee will be $950
million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Express Scripts, or at the
time of termination could have been terminated by Express
Scripts, for Medcos willful breach of its obligation to
make and not withdraw the Medco recommendation or its
non-solicitation obligations; or
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Medco prior to receipt of
the Medco stockholder approval, so that Medco may enter into a
definitive agreement providing for a superior proposal.
|
The merger agreement provides that Medco will pay Express
Scripts $227.5 million of the termination fee plus Express
Scripts documented, out of pocket expenses (including
financing expenses) not to exceed $100 million by wire
transfer of
same-day
funds on the date of termination of the merger agreement if the
merger agreement is, or at the time of termination could have
been terminated, as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to consummate the mergers prior to the outside date
(as it may be extended) and a takeover proposal (substituting
40% for 15% in the definition of
takeover proposal) for Medco is publicly disclosed
prior to the date of termination and the vote seeking the Medco
stockholder approval had not been taken prior to the seventh
business day prior to the outside date (as it may be
extended); or
|
|
|
|
a failure to obtain the Medco stockholder approval at the Medco
special meeting and a takeover proposal (substituting
40% for 15% in the definition of
takeover proposal) is publicly disclosed prior to
the date of the Medco special meeting.
|
If, within one year of a termination described in either of the
two previous bullets, Medco enters into a definitive agreement
providing for, or otherwise consummates, a takeover proposal
(substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of takeover proposal), then Medco will
pay to Express Scripts the full amount of the termination fee
less any amount of the termination fee and any expenses
previously paid upon the earlier of the public announcement of
Medcos entry into any such agreement or the consummation
of any such transaction.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Express
Scripts expenses or the full amount of the termination fee
be paid more than once, nor shall Express Scripts be paid an
aggregate amount pursuant to the expense reimbursement and
termination fee provisions of the merger agreement in excess of
the full amount of the termination fee.
179
The merger agreement also contains certain termination rights
for Medco and provides that Express Scripts will pay Medco the
termination fee by wire transfer of
same-day
funds on the date of termination of the merger agreement under
specified circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Medco, or at the time of
termination could have been terminated by Medco for: (i) an
adverse recommendation change made by the Express Scripts board
or any committee thereof prior to the Express Scripts special
meeting, (ii) a failure by Express Scripts to include the
Express Scripts recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, (iii) a failure by the Express
Scripts board to recommend against acceptance by its
stockholders of a tender offer or exchange offer, (iv) a
failure by the Express Scripts board to affirm the Express
Scripts recommendation upon a reasonable request by Medco or
(v) or a formal resolution by the Express Scripts board to
take or a public announcement of an intention to take any of the
foregoing summarized actions; provided that for each of the
foregoing clauses (i) - (v), in the event that there was no
takeover proposal outstanding with respect to Express Scripts at
the time of the event giving rise to Medcos right to
terminate the merger agreement, the termination fee will be $950
million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Medco, or at the time of
termination could have been terminated by Medco for Express
Scripts willful breach of its obligation to make and not
withdraw the Express Scripts recommendation or its
non-solicitation obligations; or
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement is terminated by Express Scripts prior to
receipt of the Express Scripts stockholder approval, so that
Express Scripts may enter into a definitive agreement providing
for a superior proposal.
|
The merger agreement provides that Express Scripts will pay
Medco $227.5 million of the termination fee plus
Medcos documented, out of pocket expenses (including
financing expenses) not to exceed $100 million by wire
transfer of
same-day
funds on the date of termination of the merger agreement if the
merger agreement is, or at the time of termination could have
been terminated, as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
a failure to consummate the mergers prior to the outside date
(as it may be extended) and a takeover proposal (substituting
40% for 15% in the definition of
takeover proposal) for Express Scripts is publicly
disclosed prior to the date of termination and the vote seeking
the Express Scripts stockholder approval had not been taken
prior to the seventh business day prior to the outside date (as
it may be extended); or
|
|
|
|
a failure to obtain the Express Scripts stockholder approval at
the Express Scripts special meeting and a takeover proposal
(substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of takeover proposal) is publicly
disclosed prior to the date of the Express Scripts special
meeting.
|
If, within one year of a termination described in either of the
two previous bullets, Express Scripts enters into a definitive
agreement providing for, or otherwise consummates, a takeover
proposal (substituting 40% for 15% in
the definition of takeover proposal), then Express
Scripts will pay to Medco the full amount of the termination fee
less any amount of the termination fee and any expenses
previously paid upon the earlier of the public announcement of
Express Scripts entry into any such agreement or the
consummation of any such transaction.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Medcos
expenses or the full amount of the termination fee be paid more
than once, nor shall Medco be paid an aggregate amount pursuant
to the expense reimbursement and termination fee provisions of
the merger agreement in excess of the full amount of the
termination fee.
The parties have agreed that other than with respect to claims
for fraud or willful breaches of any representation, warranty,
covenant or other agreement set forth in the merger agreement,
(i) if any termination fee is paid to a party, such payment
will be the sole and exclusive remedy of such party, its
subsidiaries, stockholders, affiliates, officers, directors,
employees and representatives against the other party or any of
its representatives or affiliates for, (ii) in no event
will the party being paid any termination fee or any other such
person seek to recover any other money damages or seek any other
remedy based on a claim in law or equity
180
with respect to, (A) any loss suffered as a result of the
failure of the mergers to be consummated, (B) the
termination of the merger agreement, (C) any liabilities or
obligations arising under the merger agreement, or (D) any
claims or actions arising out of or relating to any breach,
termination or failure of or under the merger agreement, and
(iii) upon payment of such termination fee, no party nor
any affiliates or representatives of any party shall have any
further liability or obligation to the other party relating to
or arising out of the merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated thereby.
Amendment
and Waiver
Amendment
The merger agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented in
any and all respects by a written agreement of the parties with
respect to any of the terms contained in the merger agreement,
either before or after the vote of the stockholders of Medco or
Express Scripts; provided, however, that no amendment may be
made following the adoption of the merger agreement by the
Express Scripts or Medco stockholders unless, to the extent
required, approved by the stockholders; and provided further
that no amendment may be made to the merger agreement that would
adversely affect the rights of the financing sources without the
consent of the financing sources.
Waiver
At any time prior to the effective times of the mergers the
parties may:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other parties;
|
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties
contained in the merger agreement or in any document delivered
pursuant to the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
subject to the provisos in the amendment provisions described
above, waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions
contained in the merger agreement.
|
Any agreement on the part of a party to any such extension or
waiver will be valid only if set forth in an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of such party.
Specific
Performance; Third-Party Beneficiaries
Specific
Performance
The parties are entitled to an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of the merger agreement or to enforce
specifically the performance of the terms and provisions of the
merger agreement (including the obligations of the parties to
consummate the mergers and the obligation of Express Scripts,
New Express Scripts and the Merger Subs to pay, and the affected
partys stockholders right to receive, the merger
consideration payable to them pursuant to the mergers, subject
in each case to the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or
any court of the United States located in the State of Delaware,
in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at
law or in equity. The parties have agreed that Express Scripts
will not be required to litigate against its financing sources,
but the parties have agreed that this provision and certain
covenants with respect to the financing of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement shall not be interpreted or
applied in such a way as to eliminate or otherwise mitigate the
obligations of New Express Scripts, Express Scripts or the
Merger Subs to satisfy their respective obligations to fund the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
181
Third-Party
Beneficiaries
The merger agreement is not intended to confer upon any person
other than the parties thereto any rights or remedies, except:
|
|
|
|
|
for the provisions of the merger agreement relating to
indemnification and exculpation from liability for the directors
and officers of Medco, Express Scripts and their subsidiaries,
and each of their employees who serves as a fiduciary of a Medco
benefit plan or Express Scripts benefit plan;
|
|
|
|
for the financing sources, with respect to the provisions of the
merger agreement which make the termination fee the sole and
exclusive remedy of the parties and the jurisdiction provisions
and the waiver of jury trial provisions; and
|
|
|
|
that following the effective time of the Medco merger, the
provisions of the merger agreement relating to the payment of
the Medco merger consideration are enforceable by stockholders
of Medco to the extent necessary to receive the Medco merger
consideration to which such holder is entitled.
|
ADVISORY
VOTE ON MERGER-RELATED COMPENSATION FOR MEDCO NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Golden
Parachute Compensation
This section sets forth the information required by
Item 402(t) of
Regulation S-K
regarding the compensation for each named executive officer of
Medco that is based on or otherwise relates to the Medco merger.
This compensation is referred to as golden parachute
compensation by the applicable SEC disclosure rules, and in this
section we use such term to describe the merger-related
compensation payable to our named executive officers. The
golden parachute compensation payable to these
individuals is subject to a non-binding advisory vote of
Medcos stockholders, as described below in this section.
Upon completion of the Medco merger, all outstanding Medco
equity compensation awards will be converted into an equivalent
equity award with respect to New Express Scripts common stock.
None of the outstanding equity awards will vest upon the
completion of the Medco merger. The terms of the outstanding
equity awards provide for double-trigger vesting
(i.e., vesting is triggered upon the termination of an
executives employment by Medco or Express Scripts without
cause or by the named executive officer for
good reason, in each case within two years following
completion of the Medco merger).
Each named executive officer of Medco is also entitled to
certain double-trigger severance payments and
benefits upon a termination of employment by Medco or Express
Scripts without cause or a resignation by the named
executive officer for good reason (in either case, a
qualifying termination) as described in the section
titled The Mergers Interests of Officers and
Directors in the Mergers. For Mr. Snow, under his
employment agreement, a qualifying termination must occur within
one year following the Medco merger, and for the other named
executive officers, under the CIC Severance Plan, a qualifying
termination must occur within two years following the Medco
merger. Provision of these severance payments and benefits is
conditioned upon the named executive officer executing a general
release of claims in favor of Medco and in each case complying
with non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that apply
for a period of two years after the executives employment
terminates.
Assuming that the Medco merger was completed and the employment
of each of the named executive officers was terminated on
October 31, 2011 (the last practicable date prior to filing
this joint proxy statement/prospectus), each named executive
officer would receive approximately the amounts set forth in the
table below, based on a $55.76 share price of Express
Scripts common stock, which is the average closing market price
of Express Scripts common stock over the first five
business days following the July 21, 2011 public
announcement of the merger agreement. This equates to $73.97 per
Medco share based on the 0.81 exchange ratio plus the $28.80
cash per share merger consideration. The amounts reported below
are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not
actually occur, including assumptions described in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, and do not reflect certain
compensation actions occurring before completion of the
182
Medco merger (such as the grant of stock options and RSUs in
respect of 2011 performance and payment of 2011 bonuses). As a
result, the actual amounts, if any, to be received by a named
executive officer may materially differ from the amounts set
forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden Parachute Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites/
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash ($)(1)
|
|
|
Equity ($)(2)
|
|
|
Pension/NQDC(3)($)
|
|
|
Benefits ($)(3)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Other ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
David B. Snow, Jr.
|
|
$
|
12,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,340,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,962,600
|
|
Kenneth O. Klepper
|
|
$
|
5,642,867
|
|
|
$
|
10,084,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,739,669
|
|
Richard J. Rubino
|
|
$
|
3,658,067
|
|
|
$
|
6,653,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,329,203
|
|
Thomas M. Moriarty
|
|
$
|
3,217,333
|
|
|
$
|
6,526,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,760,388
|
|
Timothy C. Wentworth
|
|
$
|
2,795,633
|
|
|
$
|
6,310,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,120,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash severance includes pro-rata bonus as of October 31, 2011,
other than for David B. Snow, Jr. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Equity assumes change in control value of stock options and
restricted stock units at $73.97 stock price. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes company and employee cost of benefits for David B.
Snow, Jr. per employment agreement. All others include company
cost only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-the-money
|
|
|
Aggregate Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
RSUs that would
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
that would Vest(1)
|
|
|
Vest(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
David B. Snow, Jr.
|
|
$
|
17,370,587
|
|
|
$
|
8,970,342
|
|
|
$
|
26,340,929
|
|
Kenneth O. Klepper
|
|
$
|
4,784,517
|
|
|
$
|
5,299,581
|
|
|
$
|
10,084,098
|
|
Richard J. Rubino
|
|
$
|
3,143,923
|
|
|
$
|
3,509,877
|
|
|
$
|
6,653,800
|
|
Thomas M. Moriarty
|
|
$
|
3,075,204
|
|
|
$
|
3,451,070
|
|
|
$
|
6,526,274
|
|
Timothy C. Wentworth
|
|
$
|
2,974,062
|
|
|
$
|
3,336,417
|
|
|
$
|
6,310,479
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Aggregate Value of in the money stock options and
restricted stock units that would vest at change in control
assumes $73.97 stock price. |
Merger-Related
Compensation Proposal
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 and
Rule 14a-21(c)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Medco is seeking
non-binding, advisory stockholder approval of the compensation
of Medcos named executive officers that is based on or
otherwise relates to the Medco merger as disclosed above in this
section. The proposal gives Medcos stockholders the
opportunity to express their views on the merger-related
compensation of Medcos named executive officers.
Accordingly, Medco is requesting stockholders to adopt the
following resolution, on a non-binding, advisory basis:
RESOLVED, that the compensation that may be paid or become
payable to Medcos named executive officers, in connection
with the Medco merger, and the agreements or understandings
pursuant to which such compensation may be paid or become
payable, in each case as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t)
of
Regulation S-K
in Advisory Vote on Merger-Related Compensation for Medco
Named Executive Officers Golden Parachute
Compensation, are hereby APPROVED.
Vote
Required and Medco Board Recommendation
The vote on this proposal is a vote separate and apart from the
vote to adopt the merger agreement. Accordingly, you may vote
not to approve this proposal on merger-related executive
compensation and vote to adopt the merger agreement and vice
versa. Because the vote is advisory in nature, it will not be
binding on
183
Medco, regardless of whether the merger agreement is adopted.
Approval of the non-binding, advisory proposal with respect to
the compensation that may be received by Medcos named
executive officers in connection with the Medco merger is not a
condition to completion of the Medco merger, and failure to
approve this advisory matter will have no effect on the vote to
adopt the merger agreement. Because the merger-related executive
compensation to be paid in connection with the Medco merger is
based on contractual arrangements with the named executives,
such compensation will be payable, regardless of the outcome of
this advisory vote, if the merger agreement is adopted (subject
only to the contractual conditions applicable thereto).
The advisory vote on the compensation that may be received by
Medcos named executive officers in connection with the
Medco merger will be approved if a majority of the votes cast on
such proposal vote FOR such proposal.
THE MEDCO BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
FOR THE APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS,
OF THE COMPENSATION THAT MAY BE RECEIVED BY MEDCOS NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MEDCO MERGER.
DESCRIPTION
OF FINANCING
Overview
Consummation of the mergers is not subject to Express
Scripts ability to obtain financing. However, Express
Scripts expects to obtain financing for a portion of the cash
component of the Medco merger consideration.
Express Scripts financing in connection with the mergers
could take any of several forms or any combination of them,
including but not limited to the following: (i) Express
Scripts may draw funds under the bridge facility;
(ii) Express Scripts may issue senior notes in the public
and/or
private capital markets; (iii) Express Scripts intends to
borrow $4.0 billion under the term facility and
(iv) Express Scripts may use cash on hand. When any senior
notes are issued, the commitments under the bridge facility will
automatically reduce in an amount equal to the aggregate
principal amount of such senior notes.
Bridge
Facility
Pursuant to the terms of the bridge credit agreement, the
proceeds of the bridge facility will be used solely to pay a
portion of the cash consideration in accordance with the merger
agreement, to repay any existing indebtedness that will become
due or otherwise default upon consummation of the mergers, and
to pay related fees and expenses.
The loans under the bridge facility will mature on the date that
is 364 days after the funding date; nonetheless, subject to
certain conditions, Express Scripts may elect to extend the
maturity date of 50% of the aggregate outstanding principal
amount of loans under the bridge facility to a date that is not
later than three months following the original maturity date.
The commitments to provide the financing under the bridge
facility will terminate upon the earliest to occur of
(i) 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on April 20,
2012, which date may be extended on up to two occasions for up
to an additional six months in total if the outside date is
extended in accordance with the merger agreement, (ii) the
consummation of the mergers, (iii) the date that the merger
agreement is terminated or expires or pursuit of the mergers is
abandoned or (iv) the funding of the bridge facility. The
bridge credit agreement contains certain customary conditions to
funding.
The description of the bridge credit agreement is qualified in
its entirety by the copy thereof which is attached as
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Express Scripts on August 9, 2011 and is
incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference.
184
Interest
Rate
Borrowings under the bridge facility will bear interest, at
Express Scripts option, at a rate equal to either
(a) the highest of (i) the rate of interest announced
from time to time by Credit Suisse as its prime rate,
(ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% and
(iii) the three-month adjusted London interbank offered
rate plus 1.0%, in each case plus the applicable margin or
(b) the rate (adjusted for any statutory reserve
requirements for eurocurrency liabilities) for deposits in
dollars for a period equal to the applicable interest period
referenced by the British Bankers Association Interest
Settlement Rates plus the applicable margin. The applicable
margin for borrowings under the bridge facility may change
depending on Express Scripts consolidated leverage ratio.
Prepayments
and Redemptions
Subject to certain exceptions, prior to the funding date, the
commitments under the bridge facility will be permanently
reduced with (a) the net cash proceeds of certain equity
issuances and (b) the net cash proceeds received from the
incurrence of certain indebtedness for borrowed money.
Subject to certain exceptions, after the funding date, the
outstanding loans under the bridge facility shall be prepaid
with (a) the net cash proceeds of the sale or other
disposition of any property or assets outside the ordinary
course of business, (b) the net cash proceeds of certain
issuances of equity interest and (c) the net cash proceeds
received from the incurrence of certain indebtedness for
borrowed money.
Upon entry into the term facility, the commitments under the
bridge facility were automatically reduced by $4.0 billion.
On the date on which any senior notes are issued, the
commitments under the bridge facility shall be permanently
reduced by the aggregate principal amount of such senior notes.
Commitments under the bridge facility may be reduced in whole or
in part at the election of Express Scripts without premium or
penalty. Following the funding date, loans under the bridge
facility may be prepaid in whole or in part at the election of
Express Scripts without premium or penalty, subject to the
payment by Express Scripts of any breakage costs in the case of
the prepayment of loans bearing interest with reference to the
adjusted eurodollar rate other than on the last day of the
related interest period.
Guarantee
On and after the funding date, all obligations under the bridge
facility will be jointly and severally guaranteed by each
existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic
subsidiary of New Express Scripts, subject to exceptions for
certain exempt subsidiaries.
Covenants
and Events of Default
The bridge credit agreement contains a number of covenants that,
subject to certain exceptions, contain:
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on non-guarantor subsidiary indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
limitations on liens;
|
|
|
|
in the event Express Scripts fails to maintain investment grade
ratings, limitations on restricted junior payments;
|
|
|
|
limitations on fundamental changes;
|
|
|
|
limitations on changing the fiscal year of Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
limitations on sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
limitations on changes in nature of business; and
|
|
|
|
limitations on transactions with affiliates.
|
In addition, the bridge credit agreement requires Express
Scripts to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.5
to 1.0 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.5 to 1.0.
185
The bridge credit agreement also contains certain customary
events of default, including those relating to non-payment,
breach of covenants, cross-default, bankruptcy and change of
control.
Permanent
Facility
Pursuant to the terms of the term/revolving credit agreement,
(a) the proceeds of the term facility will be used solely
to pay a portion of the cash consideration in accordance with
the merger agreement, to repay any existing indebtedness that
will become due or otherwise default upon consummation of the
mergers, and to pay related fees and expenses and (b) the
proceeds of the revolving facility will be used for working
capital needs and general corporate purposes.
The term facility and the revolving facility will both mature on
August 29, 2016.
The commitments to provide the financing under the term facility
will terminate upon the earliest to occur of
(i) 5:00 p.m. (New York City time) on April 20,
2012, which date may be extended on up to two occasions for up
to an additional six months in total if the outside date is
extended in accordance with the merger agreement (ii) the
consummation of the mergers, (iii) the date that the merger
agreement is terminated, or expires or pursuit of the mergers is
abandoned and (iv) the funding of the term facility. The
commitments to provide the financing under the revolving
facility will terminate on August 29, 2016. The
term/revolving credit agreement contains certain customary
conditions to funding.
The description of the term/revolving credit agreement is
qualified in its entirety by the copy thereof which is attached
as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K
filed by Express Scripts on August 30, 2011 and is
incorporated in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference.
Interest
Rate
Borrowings under the term facility and the revolving facility
will bear interest, at Express Scripts option, at a rate
equal to either (a) the highest of (i) the rate of
interest announced from time to time by Credit Suisse as its
prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%
and (iii) the three-month adjusted London interbank offered
rate plus 1.0%, in each case plus the applicable margin or
(b) the rate (adjusted for any statutory reserve
requirements for eurocurrency liabilities) for deposits in
dollars for a period equal to the applicable interest period
referenced by the British Bankers Association Interest
Settlement Rates plus the applicable margin. The applicable
margin for borrowings under the term facility and the revolving
facility may change depending on Express Scripts
consolidated leverage ratio.
Prepayments
Loans and commitments under the permanent facility may be
prepaid or reduced in whole or in part at the election of
Express Scripts without premium or penalty, subject to the
payment by Express Scripts of any breakage costs in the case of
the prepayment of loans bearing interest with reference to the
adjusted eurodollar rate other than on the last day of the
related interest period.
Guarantee
On and after the funding date, all obligations under the
permanent facility will be jointly and severally guaranteed by
each existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic
subsidiary of New Express Scripts, subject to exceptions for
certain exempt subsidiaries.
Covenants
and Events of Default
The term/revolving credit agreement contains a number of
covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, contain:
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on non-guarantor subsidiary indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
limitations on liens;
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on fundamental changes;
|
|
|
|
limitations on changing the fiscal year of Express Scripts;
|
|
|
|
limitations on sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
limitations on changes in nature of business; and
|
|
|
|
limitations on transactions with affiliates.
|
In addition, the term/revolving credit agreement requires
Express Scripts to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage
ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.5
to 1.0.
The term/revolving credit agreement also contains certain
customary events of default, including those relating to
non-payment, breach of covenants, cross-default, bankruptcy and
change of control.
DESCRIPTION
OF NEW EXPRESS SCRIPTS CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a summary of the material terms of New
Express Scripts capital stock as of the effective times of
the mergers and is not complete. You should also refer to
(1) New Express Scripts amended and restated
certificate of incorporation, which we refer to as the New
Express Scripts certificate of incorporation, which will be in
effect as of the effective times of the mergers and a form of
which is included as Annex F to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference,
(2) New Express Scripts amended and restated bylaws,
which we refer to as the New Express Scripts bylaws, which will
be in effect as of the effective times of the mergers and a form
of which is included as Annex G to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference and
(3) the applicable provisions of the DGCL. The following
summary should be read in conjunction with the section entitled
Comparison of Stockholder Rights beginning on
page 192.
Common
Stock
As of the effective times of the mergers, New Express Scripts
will be authorized to issue up to 2,985,000,000 shares of
common stock. Immediately following the mergers, New Express
Scripts expects there to be approximately
799,084,088 million shares of common stock of New Express
Scripts issued and outstanding.
Holders of New Express Scripts common stock will be entitled to
receive dividends when, as and if declared by New Express
Scripts board of directors out of funds legally available
for payment.
Subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of any series of
preferred stock if and when issued and subject to applicable
law, each holder of New Express Scripts common stock will be
entitled to one vote per share and all voting rights will be
vested in the New Express Scripts common stock. Holders of
shares of New Express Scripts common stock will have
noncumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of
more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of directors
can elect 100% of the directors and the holders of the remaining
shares will not be able to elect any directors.
In the event of a voluntary or involuntary liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of New Express Scripts, the holders of
New Express Scripts common stock will be entitled to share
equally in any of the assets available for distribution after
New Express Scripts has paid in full all of its debts and after
the holders of all series of New Express Scripts
outstanding preferred stock, if any, have received their
liquidation preferences in full.
The shares of New Express Scripts common stock to be issued at
the effective time of the Medco merger will be validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable. Holders of shares of New Express
Scripts common stock will not be entitled to preemptive rights.
Shares of New Express Scripts common stock will not be
convertible into shares of any other class of capital stock.
187
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company will be
the transfer agent for the New Express Scripts common stock. New
Express Scripts may from time to time after the consummation of
the mergers engage another transfer agent for its stock as
business circumstances warrant.
Blank
Check Preferred Stock
Under the New Express Scripts certificate of incorporation,
without further stockholder action, the New Express Scripts
board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of
preferred stock in one or more series, to fix the number of
shares of any such series, and to fix the designation of any
such series as well as the powers, preferences, and rights and
the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of the
preferred stock and to increase or decrease the number of shares
of any such series (but not below the number of shares of such
series then outstanding).
CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF MEDCO COMMON STOCK
The following tables set forth, as of October 31, 2011
(except as otherwise noted), information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of the outstanding shares of Medco common
stock for:
|
|
|
|
|
Each of Medcos directors and named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Each of Medcos directors and executive officers as a
group; and
|
|
|
|
Each person or group of affiliated persons whom Medco knows to
beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding
shares of Medco common stock.
|
The following table gives effect to the shares of Medco common
stock issuable within 60 days of October 31, 2011 upon
the exercise of all options and other rights beneficially owned
by the indicated stockholders on that date. Beneficial ownership
is determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act and includes voting and investment power
with respect to shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons
named in the table directly own the shares and have sole voting
and sole investment power with
188
respect to all shares beneficially owned. Unless otherwise
indicated, the address for those listed below is
c/o Medco
Health Solutions, Inc., 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Franklin Lakes,
New Jersey 07417.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name
|
|
Position Held
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
Howard W. Barker, Jr.(2)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
John L. Cassis(3)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
74,900
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Michael Goldstein(4)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
68,506
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Charles M. Lillis(5)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
105,300
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Myrtle S. Potter(6)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
William L. Roper(7)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
28,365
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
David D. Stevens(8)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
36,600
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Blenda J. Wilson(9)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
69,050
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
David B. Snow, Jr.(10)
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2,450,854
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Kenneth O. Klepper(11)
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
561,863
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Richard J. Rubino(12)
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
206,923
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Thomas M. Moriarty(13)
|
|
General Counsel, Secretary and President, Global Pharmaceutical
Strategies
|
|
|
173,844
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Timothy C. Wentworth(14)
|
|
Group President, Employer & Key Accounts
|
|
|
174,435
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group
|
|
|
|
|
5,802,461
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Represents less than 1% of outstanding shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
1. |
|
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of
October 31, 2011 was 387,107,721. |
|
|
|
2. |
|
Mr. Barkers beneficially owned stock includes 30,300
restricted stock units fully vested but deferred until
retirement and 38,000 options that are fully vested and
exercisable. |
|
|
|
3. |
|
Mr. Cassis beneficially owned stock includes 28,900
restricted stock units fully vested but deferred until
retirement and 46,000 options that are fully vested and
exercisable. |
|
|
|
4. |
|
Mr. Goldsteins beneficially owned stock includes
10,706 shares owned outright, 27,800 restricted stock units
fully vested but deferred until retirement and 30,000 options
that are fully vested and exercisable. |
|
|
|
5. |
|
Mr. Lillis beneficially owned stock includes
3,500 shares owned outright, 23,800 restricted stock units
fully vested but deferred until retirement and 78,000 options
that are fully vested and exercisable. |
|
|
|
6. |
|
Ms. Potters beneficially owned stock includes 4,100
restricted stock units fully vested but deferred until
retirement and 24,200 options that are fully vested and
exercisable. |
|
|
|
7. |
|
Dr. Ropers beneficially owned stock includes
65 shares owned outright, 4,100 restricted stock units
fully vested but deferred until retirement and 24,200 options
that are fully vested and exercisable. |
|
|
|
8. |
|
Mr. Stevens beneficially owned stock includes
1,700 shares owned outright, 4,900 restricted stock units
vested but deferred until retirement and 30,000 options that are
currently exercisable. |
|
|
|
9. |
|
Dr. Wilsons beneficially owned stock includes
2,500 shares owned outright, 27,800 restricted stock units
fully vested but deferred until retirement and 38,750 options
that are fully vested and exercisable. |
|
|
|
10. |
|
Mr. Snows beneficially owned stock includes
220,754 shares owned individually and in a trust, 102,044
fully vested restricted stock units that Mr. Snow has
elected to defer receipt of until six months after his
termination of employment, and 2,128,056 options that are
currently exercisable. |
189
|
|
|
11. |
|
Mr. Kleppers beneficially owned stock includes
81,447 shares owned outright, 50,000 fully vested
restricted stock units that Mr. Klepper has elected to
defer receipt of until six months after his termination of
employment, and 430,416 options that are currently exercisable. |
|
|
|
12. |
|
Mr. Rubinos beneficially owned stock includes
30,949 shares owned outright, 9,569 shares held in
Medcos 401(k) Plan, and 166,405 options that are
currently exercisable. |
|
|
|
13. |
|
Mr. Moriartys beneficially owned stock includes
14,224 shares owned outright, 7,988 fully vested restricted
stock units that Mr. Moriarty has elected to defer receipt
of until February 25, 2016, 4,502 shares held in
Medcos 401(k) Plan, and 147,130 options that are currently
exercisable. |
|
|
|
14. |
|
Mr. Wentworths beneficially owned stock includes
15,340 shares owned outright, 35,400 vested restricted
stock units that Mr. Wentworth has elected to defer receipt
of until six months after his termination of employment,
6,662 shares held in Medcos 401(k) Plan, and 117,033
options that are currently exercisable. |
The following table gives information about each person or group
of affiliated persons whom Medco knows to be the beneficial
owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares
of Medco common stock as of the dates set forth below, based on
information filed by that entity with the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Common
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding(1)
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.(2)
|
|
|
26,468,496
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares of Medco common stock outstanding as of
October 31, 2011 was 387,107,721. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on its report on Schedule 13G, as filed
February 7, 2011. |
CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF EXPRESS SCRIPTS COMMON STOCK
The following table contains certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of Express Scripts common stock as of
September 12, 2011 (unless otherwise noted) for:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by Express Scripts to own beneficially more
than five percent of the outstanding shares of Express Scripts
common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of Express Scripts directors and named executive
officers; and
|
|
|
|
all of Express Scripts current executive officers and
directors as a group.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, each of the persons or entities
listed below exercises sole voting and investment power over the
shares that each of them beneficially owns. The business address
for each of
190
Express Scripts directors and officers listed below is
c/o Express
Scripts, Inc., One Express Way, St. Louis, MO 63121.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Issuable
|
|
|
Other Stock
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
|
Directly or
|
|
|
within 60
|
|
|
within 60
|
|
|
-Based
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Name
|
|
Indirectly
|
|
|
days
|
|
|
days(1)
|
|
|
Holdings(2)
|
|
|
Owned(3)
|
|
|
George Paz
|
|
|
1,932,689
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
66,370
|
|
|
|
1,999,059
|
|
Gary G. Benanav
|
|
|
85,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
85,980
|
|
Maura C. Breen
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
William J. DeLaney
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Nicholas J. LaHowchic
|
|
|
71,486
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
71,486
|
|
Thomas P. Mac Mahon
|
|
|
75,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
75,980
|
|
Frank Mergenthaler
|
|
|
16,656
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,656
|
|
Woodrow A. Myers
|
|
|
34,802
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34,802
|
|
John O. Parker, Jr.
|
|
|
69,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
69,980
|
|
Samuel K. Skinner
|
|
|
85,980
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
85,980
|
|
Seymour Sternberg
|
|
|
77,672
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
77,672
|
|
Jeffrey Hall
|
|
|
298,953
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
298,953
|
|
Keith Ebling
|
|
|
366,905
|
|
|
|
7,502
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
375,555
|
|
Edward Ignaczak
|
|
|
152,041
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
155,498
|
|
Patrick McNamee
|
|
|
335,232
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
336,425
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (16 persons)
|
|
|
3,677,764
|
|
|
|
7,502
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
72,318
|
|
|
|
3,758,732
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares that may be acquired within 60 days of
November 4, 2011 upon the lapse of restrictions on
restricted stock units (RSUs). |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes phantom shares representing fully-vested investments in
the Company Stock fund under the EDCP, as to which no voting or
investment power exists. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The total beneficial ownership for any individual, and total for
the directors and executive officers as a group is less than 1%,
based on 485,490,309 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding on November 4, 2011. |
The following table sets forth information as to each person or
entity known to Express Scripts to be the beneficial owner of
more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Express
Scripts common stock as of November 4, 2011 (percent of
Express Scripts common stock outstanding based on shares
outstanding on November 4, 2011).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name and Mailing Address
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
New York Life Insurance Company; NYLIFE, LLC(1)
|
|
|
33,291,200
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
51 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(2)
|
|
|
29,785,336
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The information with respect to the beneficial ownership of
these shares is based on an amendment to Schedule 13G filed
February 24, 2011. Such filing reports that the beneficial
owner, New York Life Insurance Company, or New York
Life, shares voting and dispositive power with respect to
all of the shares reported, and that NYLIFE LLC, or
NYLife, a subsidiary of New York Life, owns
33,291,200 of such shares. In August 2001, NYLife entered into a
ten-year forward sale contract with respect to up to |
191
|
|
|
|
|
36,000,000 of the shares of common stock, and, in June 2007,
entered into a forward sale contract with respect to up to
5,600,000 of such 36,000,000 shares of common stock, which
will settle concurrently with the 2001 contract. The aggregate
number of shares deliverable under such forward sale contracts
is limited to 36,000,000. Absent the occurrence of certain
accelerating events, New York Life or NYLife, as applicable,
retains the right to vote the shares subject to such forward
sale contracts, but is subject to restrictions on the transfer
of such shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Information is based on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 9, 2011 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price
Associates). The filing indicates that as of December 31,
2010, Price Associates had sole voting power for
8,890,964 shares, and sole dispositive power for
29,785,336 shares. |
COMPARISON
OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
This section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus describes
the material differences between the rights of Express Scripts
stockholders, Medco stockholders and New Express Scripts
stockholders.
The rights of Express Scripts stockholders are currently
governed by the DGCL and the amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and third amended and restated bylaws of Express
Scripts, which we refer to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws of Express Scripts. The rights of Medco stockholders are
currently governed by the DGCL, and the amended and restated
certificate of incorporation of Medco, and the amended and
restated bylaws of Medco, which we refer to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws of Medco. Upon completion of the mergers, the rights of
Express Scripts stockholders and Medco stockholders who become
stockholders of New Express Scripts in the mergers will be
governed by the DGCL and the certificate of incorporation and
bylaws of New Express Scripts.
This section does not include a complete description of all
differences among the rights of Express Scripts stockholders,
Medco stockholders and New Express Scripts stockholders, nor
does it include a complete description of the specific rights of
these stockholders. Furthermore, the identification of some of
the differences in the rights of these stockholders as material
is not intended to indicate that other differences do not exist.
You are urged to read carefully the relevant provisions of the
DGCL, as well as the certificates of incorporation and bylaws of
Express Scripts, New Express Scripts and Medco. Copies of the
certificates of incorporation and bylaws of Express Scripts and
Medco are filed as exhibits to the reports of Express Scripts
and Medco incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 208. Forms of the
certificates of incorporation and bylaws of New Express Scripts
are included as Annex F and Annex G, respectively, to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
Authorized Capital
|
|
The aggregate number of shares which Express Scripts has the
authority to issue is (i) 1,000,000,000 shares of Express
Scripts common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and (ii)
5,000,000 shares of Express Scripts preferred stock, par
value $0.01 per share. The board of directors is authorized to
issue the preferred stock in one or more series, to fix the
number of shares of any such series, and
|
|
The aggregate number of shares which Medco has the authority to
issue (i) 2,000,000,000 shares of Medco common stock, par
value of $0.01 and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of Medco
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share issued in one or more
series from time to time. The board of directors is expressly
authorized to fix by resolution the designations and the powers,
preferences and rights, and the
|
|
The aggregate number of shares which New Express Scripts has the
authority to issue is (i) 2,985,000,000 shares of New
Express Scripts common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and
(ii) 15,000,000 shares of New Express Scripts preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share. The board of directors is
authorized to issue the preferred stock in one or more series,
to fix the number of shares of any
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
to fix the designation of any such series as well as the
powers, preferences, and rights and the qualifications,
limitations, or restrictions of the preferred stock. As of the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, no shares of
Express Scripts preferred stock are outstanding.
|
|
qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the shares of
each series of preferred stock and issue preferred stock in one
or more series from time to time. As of the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, no shares of preferred stock are
outstanding.
|
|
such series, and to fix the designation of any such series as
well as the powers, preferences, and rights and the
qualifications, limitations, or restrictions of the preferred
stock. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
no shares of New Express Scripts preferred stock are
outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Rights
|
|
Except as otherwise provided by applicable law or in the
certificate of incorporation or in a preferred stock
designation, the holders of Express Scripts common stock will
have the exclusive right to vote for the election of directors
and for all other purposes.
|
|
The bylaws of Medco provide that, unless otherwise provided in
the certificate of incorporation, each stockholder entitled to
vote at any meeting of stockholders shall be entitled to one
vote for each share of stock held by such stockholder which has
voting power upon the matter in question.
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and Election of Directors
|
|
The Express Scripts board must consist of no less than seven and
no more than fifteen directors. The number of directors is
determined from time to time by resolution of a majority of the
entire board of directors then in office, subject to the rights
of the holders of any series of preferred stock. No decrease in
the number of directors will shorten the term of any incumbent
director. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors are
elected to hold office until the next annual meeting and until
the election and qualification of their respective
successors.
|
|
The Medco board must consist of no less than three and no more
than fifteen directors. The authorized number of directors may
be fixed from time to time by resolutions duly adopted by the
board of directors. No decrease in the number of directors will
shorten the term of any incumbent director.
Each director is elected by the vote of the majority of the
votes cast with respect to that directors election at any
meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is
present, provided that directors are elected by a plurality of
the votes cast at any meeting of stockholders
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
Unless the election is contested, each director is elected by
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or
against the director at any meeting for the election of
directors at which a quorum is present. In a contested election,
directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a
meeting of stockholders by the holders of shares entitled to
vote in the election. An election is considered contested if
there are more nominees for election than positions on the board
of directors to be filled by election at the meeting, as
determined by the secretary of Express Scripts (i) following the
close of the applicable notice of nomination period under the
bylaws, if any, or (ii) if later, reasonably promptly following
the determination by any court or other tribunal of competent
jurisdiction that one or more notice(s) of nomination were
timely filed in accordance with the bylaws.
|
|
at which a quorum is present for which (A) the secretary of
Medco receives a notice that a stockholder intends to nominate a
person (or persons) for election to the board of directors and
(B) such proposed nomination has not been withdrawn by such
stockholder prior to the fifth calendar day prior to the date
that Medco first mails its notice of meeting for such meeting to
stockholders. If directors are to be elected by a plurality of
the votes cast, stockholders are not permitted to vote against a
nominee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vacancies on the Board of Directors and Removal of
Directors
|
|
The bylaws of Express Scripts provide that, subject to the
rights of any holders of any series of preferred stock, if any,
newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the
number of directors and vacancies occurring in the board of
directors for any reason may be filled for the unexpired term by
a vote of a majority
|
|
The certificate of incorporation provides that, subject to the
rights, if any, of the holders of preferred stock, newly created
directorships resulting from any increase in the number of
directors, and any vacancies on the board of directors, are
filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors
then in office.
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
of the directors then in office, even if less than a quorum
exists.
Directors may be removed, either with or without cause, by vote
of the holders of a majority of the stock having voting power
and entitled to vote thereon.
|
|
A director elected in accordance with the preceding sentence
will hold office for the remainder of the one-year term and
until such directors successor shall have been duly
elected and qualified, or until his or her death, resignation,
retirement, disqualification, or removal.
The bylaws of Medco provide that, subject to the rights, if
any, of the holders of preferred stock, newly created
directorships resulting from any increase in the number of
directors, and any vacancies on the board of directors, will be
filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors
then in office, even if less than a quorum, or by a sole
remaining director in office. Any director elected in accordance
with the preceding sentence will hold office for the remainder
of the one-year term, or if applicable, the remainder of the
full term of the class of directors, in which the new
directorship was created or the vacancy occurred, and until such
directors successor shall have been duly elected and
qualified, or until his or her death, resignation, retirement,
disqualification, or removal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendments to Certificates of Incorporation
|
|
Under Section 242 of the DGCL, unless the certificate of
incorporation requires a
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
greater vote, a proposed amendment to the certificate of
incorporation must be approved by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the voting power of the outstanding stock entitled
to vote thereon and a majority of the outstanding stock of each
class entitled to vote as a class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendments
to Bylaws
|
|
The Express Scripts bylaws may be amended, repealed or adopted
by a majority of the entire board of directors. The bylaws may
also be amended, repealed or adopted by the vote of the holders
of a majority of the voting power of the stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.
|
|
The Medco certificate of incorporation provides that the board
of directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal
any bylaws of Medco by resolutions duly adopted by a majority of
the directors then in office.
The Medco certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that
Medco stockholders may adopt additional bylaws and may amend or
repeal any bylaw whether or not adopted by them, at a meeting
duly called for that purpose, by the affirmative vote of the
holders of not less than fifty percent of the voting power of
all outstanding shares of capital stock of Medco entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors, considered for such
purposes as a single class.
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified Board
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Voting
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Call Special Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
Special meetings of Express Scripts stockholders may be called
by the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, or by
resolution of the board
|
|
The Medco certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that,
subject to the rights, if any, of the holders of preferred
stock, special meetings of stockholders may be
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
of directors and will be called by the secretary upon the
written request of the holders of record representing not less
than thirty-five percent of the voting power of all capital
stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote on the matter
or matters to be brought before the proposed special meeting.
|
|
called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the
president, the chief executive officer of the corporation or a
majority of the board of directors, and shall be called by the
secretary of Medco upon the written request of the holders of
record of not less than forty percent of the voting power of all
outstanding shares of Medco common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice Required for Stockholder Nominations and other
Proposals
|
|
Nominations: A stockholders notice must be
delivered to, or mailed to and received by, the Secretary at the
principal executive offices of Express Scripts (i) in the case
of an annual meeting, no less than 90 days or more than
120 days in advance of the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting; provided, that if (A) no
annual meeting was held in the previous year or (B) the date of
the annual meeting has been advanced by more than 30 days
or delayed by more than 60 days from the date of the
previous years meeting, notice by the stockholder to be
timely must be received no earlier than the opening of business
on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and no later
than the close of business of the 90th day prior to such
annual meeting or, if later, the 10th day following the day
on which public disclosure of the date of the meeting is first
made or (ii) in the event of a special meeting of
|
|
Nominations and Other Proposals: A stockholders
notice must be delivered to the secretary at the principal
executive offices of Medco no later than the close of business
on the 90th calendar day and no earlier than the close of
business on the 120th calendar day prior to the first
anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting;
provided, that if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30
calendar days before or more than 60 calendar days after such
anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be
so delivered no earlier than the close of business on the
120th calendar day prior to such annual meeting and no
later than the close of business on later of the
90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting or the
10th calendar day following the calendar day on which
public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by
Medco. In the case of a special meeting called by the
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
stockholders at which the board of directors gives notice that
directors are to be elected, no earlier than the opening of
business on the 120th day prior to such meeting and no
later than the close of business on the 90th day prior to
such special meeting, or if later, the 10th day following
the day on which public disclosure of the date of the meeting
and of the nominees proposed by the board of directors to be
elected at the meeting was made.
Other Proposals:
A stockholders notice must be delivered to, or mailed to
and received by, the secretary at the principal executive
offices of Express Scripts not less than 90 days nor more
than 120 days in advance of the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting; provided, that if (i) no
annual meeting was held in the previous year or (ii) the date of
the annual meeting has been advanced by more than 30 days
or delayed by more than 60 days from the date of the
previous years meeting, notice by the stockholder to be
timely must be received no earlier than the opening of business
on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and no later
than the close of business on the later of the 90th day
prior to such annual meeting or, if later, the 10th day
following the day on
|
|
board of directors for the purpose of electing one or more
directors, a stockholder must deliver notice of nomination of a
director to the secretary at the principal executive offices of
Medco no later than the close of business on the
10th calendar day following the day on which public
announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by Medco.
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
which public disclosure of the date of the meeting is first
made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and
Officers
|
|
The Express Scripts certificate of incorporation provides that a
person who is or was a director of Express Scripts is not
personally liable to Express Scripts or its stockholders for
monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty in such
capacity, except for (i) any breach of the directors duty
of loyalty to Express Scripts or its stockholders; (ii) acts or
omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) unlawful
payments of dividends, certain stock repurchases or redemptions;
or (iv) any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit.
|
|
The Medco certificate of incorporation provides that no director
is personally liable to Medco or its stockholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to
the extent that such exemption from liability or limitation
thereof is not permitted under the DGCL, as currently in effect
or as it may later be amended. If the DGCL is amended to
authorize further eliminating or limiting the personal liability
of directors, then the liability of a director will be
eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the
DGCL, as so amended. Section 102 of the DGCL provides that a
corporation may include in its certificate of incorporation a
provision eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a
director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. However, the
provision may not eliminate or limit the liability of a director
for; (i) a breach of the duty of loyalty; (ii) acts or omissions
not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law; (iii) unlawful payments of dividends,
certain stock repurchases or redemptions; or (iv)
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
|
|
The Express Scripts bylaws provide that Express Scripts will
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, by reason of the fact that he or she is or was or
has agreed to serve at the request of Express Scripts as a
director or officer of Express Scripts, or is or was serving or
has agreed to serve at the request of Express Scripts as a
director or officer (which includes a trustee or similar
capacity) of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, or by reason
of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in such
capacity, only if such person acted in good faith and in a
manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of Express Scripts and, with respect to any
criminal action, suit or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The indemnification
includes expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in
|
|
The bylaws provide that Medco will, to the fullest extent
permitted by the DGCL (as it exists on the date of adoption of
the bylaws or as it may be amended, but with respect to any
amendment, only to the extent that such amendment provides for
broader indemnification), indemnify and hold harmless each
person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a
party to or is involved in any action, suit, or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by
reason of the fact that such person or a person of whom such
person is the legal representative is or was a director or
officer of Medco or is or was serving at the request of Medco as
a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or
of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise,
including service with respect to employee benefit plans
maintained or sponsored by Medco, whether the basis of such
proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a
director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity
while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent;
provided, however, that Medco shall indemnify any such
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the indemnitee
or on his or her behalf in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding and any appeal therefrom.
Such indemnification shall include the right to be advanced
expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred by a director
or officer in defending a threatened or pending civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative action, suit or proceedings
subject to the receipt of an undertaking by the director or
officer to repay such amount if it is ultimately determined that
he or she is not entitled to be indemnified.
Additionally, Express Scripts may elect to indemnify any person
who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was or has agreed to
serve at the request of Express Scripts as an employee or agent
of Express Scripts or is or was serving or has agreed to serve
at the request of Express Scripts as an employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee
benefit plan or other enterprise, or by
|
|
person seeking indemnification in connection with a proceeding
(or part thereof) initiated by such person only if such
proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Medco board
of directors. The indemnification extends to all expense,
liability and loss (including attorneys fees, judgments,
fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid or to be
paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such
person in connection therewith, and such indemnification
continues in effect whether or not such person has ceased to be
a director, officer, employee or agent of Medco.
Such indemnification includes the right to be paid expenses
incurred in defending any proceeding in advance of its final
disposition, provided, that if required by the DGCL, the payment
of such expenses shall only be made upon the receipt of an
undertaking by the director or officer to repay such amount if
it is ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to be
indemnified.
Section 145 of the DGCL provides that, subject to certain
limitations in the case of derivative suits brought by a
corporations stockholders in its name, a corporation may
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in
such capacity.
|
|
indemnify any person who is made a party to any third- party
action, suit or proceeding on account of being a director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation (or was serving at
the request of the corporation in such capacity for another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise) against expenses, including attorneys fees,
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the action,
suit or proceeding through, among other things, a majority vote
of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the
suit or proceeding, if the person: (i) acted in good faith and
in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation; and (ii) in a
criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or
her conduct was unlawful.
Section 145 of the DGCL also permits indemnification by a
corporation under similar circumstances for expenses (including
attorney fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such persons
in connection with the defense or settlement of a derivative
action or suit, except that no indemnification may be made in
respect of any
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
claim, issue or matter as to which the person is adjudged to be
liable to the corporation unless the Delaware Court of Chancery
or the court in which the action or suit was brought determines
upon application that the person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for the expenses which the court deems to
be proper.
To the extent a director, officer, employee or agent is
successful in the defense of such an action, suit or proceeding,
the corporation is required by Section 145 of the DGCL to
indemnify such person for reasonable expenses incurred thereby.
Expenses (including attorney fees) incurred by such persons in
defending any action, suit or proceeding may be paid in advance
of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding,
provided that if required by the DGCL, the payment of such
expenses shall only be made upon receipt of an undertaking by or
on behalf of that person to repay the amount if it is ultimately
determined that that person is not entitled to be so
indemnified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Anti- Takeover Statutes
|
|
Express Scripts has elected not to be governed by Section 203 of
the DGCL, which generally prohibits business
combinations, including mergers, sales and leases of
assets,
|
|
Medcos certificate of incorporation does not opt out of
the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL, which generally
prohibits business combinations, including mergers,
sales and leases
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
issuances of securities and similar transactions by a
corporation or a subsidiary with an interested stockholder who
beneficially owns 15% or more of a corporations voting
stock within three years after the person or entity becomes an
interested stockholder, unless: (i) the board of directors of
the target corporation has approved, before the acquisition
time, either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder; (ii)
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the person
becoming an interested stockholder, the person owns at least 85%
of the corporations voting stock (excluding shares owned
by directors who are officers and shares owned by employee stock
plans in which participants do not have the right to determine
confidentially whether shares will be tendered in a tender or
exchange offer); or (iii) after the person or entity becomes an
interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by
the board of directors and authorized by the vote of at least 66
2/3 % of
the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested
stockholder at an annual or special meeting.
|
|
of assets, issuances of securities and similar transactions by
a corporation or a subsidiary with an interested stockholder who
beneficially owns 15% or more of a corporations voting
stock, within three years after the person or entity becomes an
interested stockholder, unless: (i) the board of directors of
the target corporation has approved, before the acquisition
date, either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder; (ii)
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the person
becoming an interested stockholder, the person owns at least 85%
of the corporations voting stock (excluding shares owned
by directors who are officers and shares owned by employee stock
plans in which participants do not have the right to determine
confidentially whether shares will be tendered in a tender or
exchange offer); or (iii) after the person or entity becomes an
interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by
the board of directors and authorized by the vote of at least 66
2/3 % of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the
interested stockholder at an annual or special meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions Involving Officers or Directors
|
|
Section 143 of the DGCL provides that a corporation may lend
|
|
Medcos bylaws provide that no contracts or transactions
between
|
|
Same as for Express Scripts
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
money to, or guarantee any obligation incurred by, its officers
or directors if, in the judgment of the board of directors, the
loan or guarantee may reasonably be expected to benefit the
corporation. Section 144 of the DGCL provides that any other
contract or transaction between the corporation and one or more
of its directors or officers is neither void nor voidable solely
because the interested director or officer was present,
participates or votes at the board or board committee meeting
that authorizes the contract or transaction, if either: (i) the
directors or officers interest is made known to the
disinterested directors or the stockholders of the corporation,
who thereafter approve the transaction in good faith; or (ii)
the contract or transaction is fair to the corporation as of the
time it is approved or ratified by either the board of
directors, a committee thereof, or the stockholders.
|
|
Medco and one or more of its directors or officers, or between
Medco and any other corporation, partnership, association or
other organization in which one or more of its directors or
officers are directors or officers, or have a financial
interest, will be void or voidable solely for this reason, or
solely because the director or officer is present at or
participates in the meeting of the board of directors or
committee thereof which authorizes the contract or transaction,
or solely because his or her or their votes are counted for such
purposes, if: (i) the material facts as to the officers or
directors relationship or interest and as to the contract
or transaction are disclosed or are known to the board of
directors or committee, and the board of directors or committee
in good faith authorizes the contract or transaction by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested directors,
even though less than a quorum; or (ii) the material facts as to
the officers or directors relationship or interest
and as to the contract or transaction are disclosed or are known
to the stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the contract
or transaction is specifically approved in good faith by vote of
the stockholders; or (iii) the contract or transaction is fair
as to Medco as of the time it is authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express Scripts
|
|
Medco
|
|
New Express Scripts
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved or ratified by the board of directors, a committee
thereof, or the stockholders. Common or interested directors may
be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting
of the board of directors or of a committee which authorizes the
contract or transaction.
|
|
|
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Medco and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
(which is included in Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting) incorporated in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference to
Medcos Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 25, 2010 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report, which contains an
explanatory paragraph on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting due to the exclusion of certain
elements of the internal control over financial reporting of the
United BioSource Corporation business of the Registrant acquired
as of December 25, 2010, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The financial statements incorporated in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus by reference to Express Scripts
Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 25, 2011 and
the financial statement schedules and managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting (which is included in Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting)
incorporated in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Express
Scripts for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, counsel to
Express Scripts and New Express Scripts, will pass upon the
validity of the New Express Scripts common stock offered by this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
It is a condition to the completion of the mergers that Express
Scripts receive an opinion from Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP, counsel to Express Scripts, to the
effect that the mergers will constitute exchanges to which
Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code applies, and that
Medco receive an opinion from Sullivan & Cromwell,
counsel to Medco, to the effect that the mergers will constitute
exchanges to which Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code
applies. Please see the sections entitled Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Mergers and
The Mergers Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences.
206
FUTURE
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Advance
Notice Requirements for Medco Stockholder Submission of
Nominations and Proposals
Pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, some
stockholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in
Medcos 2012 proxy statement. These stockholder proposals
must be submitted, along with proof of ownership of Medco common
stock in accordance with
Rule 14a-8(b)(2),
to Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail
Stop F3-16, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417, Attention:
Corporate Secretary. Failure to deliver a proposal by these
means may result in it not being deemed timely received. Medco
must receive all submissions no later than December 1, 2011.
Stockholders wishing to nominate persons for election as
directors or to introduce an item of business at an annual
meeting of stockholders (other than pursuant to
Rule 14a-8)
must follow the procedures set forth in Medcos Amended and
Restated Bylaws. These procedures provide that nominations for
director nominees
and/or an
item of business to be introduced at an annual meeting of
stockholders must be submitted in writing to the Corporate
Secretary at Medcos principal executive offices listed
above. Medco must receive the notice of your intention to
introduce a nomination or to propose an item of business at
Medcos 2012 annual meeting not earlier than the close of
business (5:00 p.m. Eastern time) on January 25, 2012
and not later than the close of business on February 24,
2012. In the event that the date of the 2012 annual meeting is
more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after
the anniversary date of the 2011 annual meeting, the notice must
be delivered to the Medco Corporate Secretary not earlier than
the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 2012
annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the
later of (i) the 90th day prior to the 2012 annual
meeting or (ii) the tenth calendar day following the day on
which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first
made by Medco. For any other meeting, the nomination must be
received by the tenth calendar day following the date on which
public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by
Medco.
The stockholders submission must be made by a registered
stockholder on his or her behalf or on behalf of the beneficial
owner of the shares, and must include information specified in
Medcos Amended and Restated Bylaws concerning the proposal
or nominee, as the case may be, and information as to the
stockholders ownership of Medco common stock. Medco will
not entertain any proposals or nominations at the 2012 Annual
Meeting that do not meet these requirements. If the stockholder
does not also comply with the requirements of
Rule 14a-4(c)(2)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which
among other things require him to represent in writing to Medco
that he intends to deliver a proxy statement and card to a
specified percentage of Medcos shares, Medco may exercise
discretionary voting authority under proxies that Medco solicits
to vote in accordance with Medcos best judgment on any
such stockholder proposal or nomination. Medcos Amended
and Restated Bylaws are available on the Medco website at
www.medcohealth.com/investor or from Medcos Investor
Relations Department via mail at 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail
Stop F3-3, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey or via telephone at
(201) 269-4279.
Medco strongly encourages any stockholder interested in
submitting a proposal to contact Medcos Corporate
Secretary in advance of the above deadlines to discuss the
proposal, and stockholders may want to consult knowledgeable
counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of applicable
securities laws and Medcos Amended and Restated Bylaws.
The Corporate Secretary can be reached at Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., 100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail Stop F3-16,
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417, Attention: Corporate
Secretary. Submitting a stockholder proposal does not guarantee
that Medco will include it in Medcos Proxy Statement. The
chairman of the Annual Meeting may refuse to allow the
transaction of any business, or to acknowledge the nomination of
any person, not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures.
Advance
Notice Requirements for Express Scripts Stockholder Submission
of Nominations and Proposals
In accordance with Express Scripts bylaws, a stockholder
who, at any annual meeting of Express Scripts stockholders,
intends to nominate a person for election as director or present
a proposal must so notify Express Scripts Corporate
Secretary, in writing, describing such nominee(s) or proposal
and providing information
207
concerning such stockholder and the underlying beneficial owner,
if any, including, among other things, such information as name,
address, occupation, shares, rights to acquire shares and other
derivative securities or short interest held, and any relevant
understandings or arrangements between the stockholder and
beneficial owner, if any, and the reasons for and interest of
such stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, in the proposal.
Generally, to be timely, such notice must be received by Express
Scripts Corporate Secretary not less than 90 days nor
more than 120 days in advance of the first anniversary of
the preceding years annual meeting, provided that in the
event that no annual meeting was held the previous year or the
date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than
30 days from the date of the previous years meeting,
or in the event of a special meeting of stockholders called to
elect directors, not later than the close of business on the
tenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the
meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the
meeting was made, whichever occurs first. For Express
Scripts annual meeting to be held in 2012, any such notice
must be received by Express Scripts at its principal executive
offices between January 5, 2012 and February 4, 2012
to be considered timely for purposes of the 2012 annual meeting.
Any person interested in offering such a nomination or proposal
should request a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions from
Express Scripts Corporate Secretary. These time periods
also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes
of rules adopted by the SEC relating to the exercise of
discretionary voting authority, and are separate from and in
addition to the SECs requirements that a stockholder must
meet in order to have a proposal included in Express
Scripts proxy statement.
Express Scripts bylaws also set out specific eligibility
requirements that nominees for director must satisfy, which
require nominees to:
|
|
|
|
|
complete and return a written questionnaire with respect to the
background and qualification of the nominees and the background
of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is
being made; and
|
|
|
|
provide a written representation and agreement that the nominee:
|
|
|
|
will abide by the advance resignation requirements of Express
Scripts bylaws in connection with director elections;
|
|
|
|
is not and will not become a party to (1) any agreement,
arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any
commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such
prospective nominee, if elected as a director, will act or vote
on any issue or question (a Voting Commitment) that
has not been disclosed to us or (2) any Voting Commitment
that could limit or interfere with the nominees ability to
comply, if elected as a director, with the nominees
fiduciary duties under applicable law;
|
|
|
|
is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement
or understanding with any person or entity other than us with
respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or
indemnification in connection with service or action as a
director that has not been disclosed therein; and
|
|
|
|
would be in compliance if elected as a director and will comply
with all of Express Scripts applicable corporate
governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock
ownership and trading policies and guidelines.
|
Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2012
annual meeting must be received by Express Scripts at its
principal executive office no later than November 22, 2011,
in order to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement and
proxy relating to that meeting. Upon receipt of any proposal,
Express Scripts will determine whether to include such proposal
in accordance with regulations governing the solicitation of
proxies.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Express Scripts and Medco file annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
You may read and copy any reports, statements or other
information filed by Express Scripts and Medco at the SECs
Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of
the Public Reference
208
Room. You can also inspect reports, proxy statements and other
information about Express Scripts and Medco at the offices of
the NYSE, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the
Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed
rates, or from commercial document retrieval services.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy
statements and other information, including those filed by
Express Scripts and Medco, at www.sec.gov. You may also
access the SEC filings and obtain other information about
Express Scripts and Medco through the websites maintained by
Express Scripts and Medco, which are www.express-scripts.com
and www.medcohealth.com, respectively. The
information contained in those websites is not incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The SEC allows Express Scripts and Medco to incorporate by
reference information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, which means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to other documents filed
separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by
reference is deemed to be part of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, except for any information superseded by
information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the
documents set forth below that Express Scripts (Commission file
number
000-20199)
and Medco (Commission file number
001-31312)
have previously filed with the SEC. These documents contain
important information about the companies and their financial
condition.
|
|
|
Express Scripts Filings with the SEC
|
|
Period and/or Filing Date
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010, as filed February 16, 2011*
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed April 25, 2011; Filed July 29, 2011 Filed October 25,
2011
|
|
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
|
|
Filed March 21, 2011
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed February 22, 2011; Filed March 8, 2011; Filed April 5,
2011; Filed May 10, 2011; Filed June 2, 2011; Filed July 5,
2011; Filed July 21, 2011; the first and third Form 8-Ks filed
July 22, 2011; Filed August 9, 2011; Filed August 30, 2011; the
first and second Form 8-Ks filed September 2, 2011; Filed
September 20, 2011; the first and second Form 8-Ks filed
October 6, 2011; the second Form 8-K filed
October 25, 2011; and Filed November 8, 2011.
|
|
|
|
The description of Express Scripts common stock set forth in a
registration statement filed pursuant to Section 12 of the
Exchange Act and any amendment or report filed for the purpose
of updating those descriptions.
|
|
|
* Other than the financial statements and Managements
Discussion and Analysis on Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, which have been superseded by the financial
statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2011
209
|
|
|
Medco Filings with the SEC
|
|
Period and/or Filing Date
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 25, 2010, as filed February 22, 2011
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
|
|
Filed April 28, 2011; Filed July 26, 2011; Filed
October 26, 2011
|
|
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
|
|
Filed April 8, 2011
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed January 3, 2011; Filed February 7, 2011; Filed March 18,
2011; Filed May 11, 2011; Filed May 26, 2011; Filed May 27,
2011; the second
Form 8-K
filed July 21, 2011; Filed July 22, 2011; Filed July 26,
2011; Filed July 29, 2011; Filed August 1, 2011; Filed August 2,
2011; Filed August 8, 2011; Filed August 10, 2011; Filed August
15, 2011; Filed August 19, 2011; Filed August 29, 2011; Filed
September 2, 2011; Filed September 6, 2011; Filed September 9,
2011; Filed September 20, 2011; Filed September 21, 2011; Filed
September 22, 2011; Filed September 26, 2011; Filed
November 7, 2011; and Filed November 8, 2011.
|
All documents filed by Express Scripts and Medco pursuant to
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the date of
the special meetings shall also be deemed to be incorporated
herein by reference.
You may also obtain copies of any document incorporated in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, without charge, by requesting
them in writing, by telephone or by
e-mail from
the appropriate company at the following addresses:
|
|
|
Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
Saint Louis, Missouri, 63121
Attention: Investor Relations
(314) 810-3115
www.express-scripts.com (Investor Information
tab)
|
|
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive, Mail Stop F3-3
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
Attention: Investor Relations
(201) 269-4279
www.medcohealth.com (Investors tab)
|
None of Express Scripts, New Express Scripts or Medco has
authorized anyone to give any information or make any
representation about the mergers or the special meetings that is
different from, or in addition to, that contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or in any of the materials that are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Therefore, if anyone does give you
information of this sort, you should not rely on it. If you are
in a jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or
solicitations of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities
offered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus are unlawful,
or if you are a person to whom it is unlawful to direct these
types of activities, then the offer presented in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus does not extend to you. The
information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
speaks only as of the date of this document unless the
information specifically indicates that another date applies.
210
Annex A
EXECUTION
COPY
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and among
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.,
MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.,
ARISTOTLE HOLDING, INC.,
ARISTOTLE MERGER SUB, INC.
and
PLATO MERGER SUB, INC.
Dated as of July 20, 2011
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
ARTICLE I
THE MERGERS
|
|
Section 1.1
|
|
|
The Aristotle Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
Section 1.2
|
|
|
The Plato Merger
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
Section 1.3
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
Section 1.4
|
|
|
Effective Times
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
Section 1.5
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
Section 1.6
|
|
|
Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporations
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
EFFECT ON THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT CORPORATIONS;
EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
|
|
Section 2.1
|
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock of Aristotle and Aristotle Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
Section 2.2
|
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock of Plato and Plato Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
Section 2.3
|
|
|
Effect on Parent Capital Stock
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
Section 2.4
|
|
|
Certain Adjustments
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
Section 2.5
|
|
|
Fractional Shares
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
Section 2.6
|
|
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
Section 2.7
|
|
|
Exchange of Plato Certificates
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
Section 2.8
|
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
Section 2.9
|
|
|
Plato Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
Section 2.10
|
|
|
Aristotle Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PLATO
|
|
Section 3.1
|
|
|
Corporate Organization
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 3.2
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
Section 3.3
|
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability; State
Takeover Statutes
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
Section 3.4
|
|
|
Consents and Approvals; No Conflicts
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
Section 3.5
|
|
|
SEC Documents; Financial Statements; Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
Section 3.6
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 3.7
|
|
|
Information Supplied
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 3.8
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
Section 3.9
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 3.10
|
|
|
Regulatory Compliance
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
Section 3.11
|
|
|
Absence of Changes in Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 3.12
|
|
|
ERISA Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
Section 3.13
|
|
|
Employee and Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
Section 3.14
|
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
Section 3.15
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 3.16
|
|
|
Tax Returns and Tax Payments
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
Section 3.17
|
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
Section 3.18
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
Section 3.19
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 3.20
|
|
|
Brokers Fees
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 3.21
|
|
|
Opinions of Financial Advisors
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 3.22
|
|
|
Certain Additional Representations
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
Section 3.23
|
|
|
No Other Representations or Warranties
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF
ARISTOTLE, PARENT, AND THE MERGER SUBS
|
|
Section 4.1
|
|
|
Corporate Organization
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 4.2
|
|
|
Capitalization of Parent and Merger Subs
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
Section 4.3
|
|
|
Aristotle Capitalization
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
Section 4.4
|
|
|
Authority; Execution and Delivery; Enforceability; State
Takeover Statutes
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 4.5
|
|
|
Consents and Approvals; No Conflicts
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
Section 4.6
|
|
|
SEC Documents; Financial Statements; Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
Section 4.7
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
Section 4.8
|
|
|
Information Supplied
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 4.9
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 4.10
|
|
|
Compliance with Laws
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 4.11
|
|
|
Regulatory Compliance
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
|
Section 4.12
|
|
|
Absence of Changes in Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 4.13
|
|
|
ERISA Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
Section 4.14
|
|
|
Employee and Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
Section 4.15
|
|
|
Environmental Matters
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
Section 4.16
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
Section 4.17
|
|
|
Tax Returns and Tax Payments
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
Section 4.18
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
Section 4.19
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
Section 4.20
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
Section 4.21
|
|
|
Brokers Fees
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
Section 4.22
|
|
|
Opinions of Financial Advisors
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
Section 4.23
|
|
|
Certain Additional Representations
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
Section 4.24
|
|
|
No Other Representations or Warranties
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS
|
|
Section 5.1
|
|
|
Plato Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Plato Effective Time
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
|
Section 5.2
|
|
|
Aristotle Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Plato Effective Time
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
Section 5.3
|
|
|
Preparation of the
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meetings
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
Section 5.4
|
|
|
No Solicitation; No-Shop
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
Section 5.5
|
|
|
Publicity
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
Section 5.6
|
|
|
Notification of Certain Matters
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
Section 5.7
|
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
Section 5.8
|
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
Section 5.9
|
|
|
Indemnification
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
Section 5.10
|
|
|
Control of Operations
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
Section 5.11
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
Section 5.12
|
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-56
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Section 5.13
|
|
|
Additional Agreements
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
|
Section 5.14
|
|
|
Stock Exchange Listing
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
|
Section 5.15
|
|
|
Section 16 Matters
|
|
|
A-57
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
|
|
Section 6.1
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Each Party
|
|
|
A-58
|
|
|
Section 6.2
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Aristotle, Parent and the Merger
Subs to Effect the Aristotle Merger
|
|
|
A-58
|
|
|
Section 6.3
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Plato to Effect the Plato Merger
|
|
|
A-59
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
|
|
Section 7.1
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
|
Section 7.2
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-62
|
|
|
Section 7.3
|
|
|
Termination Fee; Expenses
|
|
|
A-62
|
|
|
Section 7.4
|
|
|
Procedure for Termination or Amendment
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
Section 8.1
|
|
|
Amendment and Modification
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
|
Section 8.2
|
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
|
Section 8.3
|
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
Section 8.4
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
Section 8.5
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
Section 8.6
|
|
|
Entire Agreement; Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
Section 8.7
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
|
Section 8.8
|
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
|
Section 8.9
|
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
|
Section 8.10
|
|
|
Headings; Interpretation
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
|
Section 8.11
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-67
|
|
|
Section 8.12
|
|
|
Enforcement; Exclusive Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-67
|
|
|
Section 8.13
|
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
|
|
A-68
|
|
|
Section 8.14
|
|
|
Joint Obligations
|
|
|
A-68
|
|
|
Section 8.15
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
A-68
|
|
Exhibit A Form of Aristotle Surviving Corporation
Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
|
A-74
|
|
Exhibit B Form of Plato Surviving Corporation
Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
|
A-76
|
|
Exhibit C Form of Parent Charter and Bylaws
|
|
|
A-78
|
|
A-iii
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Abatement Period
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Affiliate
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Alternative Financing
|
|
|
1.1(e)
|
|
Antitrust Counsel Only Material
|
|
|
1.1(d)
|
|
Applicable SAP
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Appraisal Shares
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Aristotle
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Aristotle Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
5.3(c)
|
|
Aristotle Benefit Plan
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Aristotle Board
|
|
|
4.4(b)
|
|
Aristotle Business Personnel
|
|
|
4.14(a)
|
|
Aristotle Capital Stock
|
|
|
4.3(a)
|
|
Aristotle Certificate
|
|
|
2.1(d)
|
|
Aristotle Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
1.4(a)
|
|
Aristotle Common Stock
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Aristotle Disclosure Letter
|
|
|
IV
|
|
Aristotle Effective Time
|
|
|
1.4(b)
|
|
Aristotle Expenses
|
|
|
7.3(c)
|
|
Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Aristotle Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
IV
|
|
Aristotle Material Intellectual Property
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Aristotle Merger
|
|
|
1.1(a)
|
|
Aristotle Merger Consideration
|
|
|
2.1(b)
|
|
Aristotle Merger Sub
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Aristotle Performance Share Award
|
|
|
2.10(a)
|
|
Aristotle Preferred Stock
|
|
|
4.3(a)
|
|
Aristotle Recommendation
|
|
|
4.4(b)
|
|
Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
|
2.10(a)
|
|
Aristotle SAR
|
|
|
2.10(a)
|
|
Aristotle SEC Documents
|
|
|
4.6(a)
|
|
Aristotle SEC Financial Statements
|
|
|
4.6(c)
|
|
Aristotle Stock Option
|
|
|
2.10(a)
|
|
Aristotle Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
4.4(c)
|
|
Aristotle Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
5.3(c)
|
|
Aristotle Subsidiary Insurance Agreements
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Aristotle Subsidiary SAP Statements
|
|
|
4.6(h)
|
|
Aristotle Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
1.1(a)
|
|
Bonus Plans
|
|
|
5.12(d)
|
|
Business Day
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Cash Portion Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
2.9(a)
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Commitment Letter
|
|
|
1.1(e), 4.20
|
|
A-iv
|
|
|
|
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Consents
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
3.4(b)
|
|
Covered Employee
|
|
|
5.12(a)
|
|
Definitive Agreements
|
|
|
1.1(a)
|
|
DGCL
|
|
|
1.4(a)
|
|
Effective Times
|
|
|
1.4(b)
|
|
Environmental Claim
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
2.7(a)
|
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
|
2.7(a)
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
2.2(e)(i)
|
|
Expedited Appeal
|
|
|
6.2(d)
|
|
Filings
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Final Offering
|
|
|
2.9(e)
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
1.1(e), 4.20
|
|
Financing Sources
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
|
|
|
3.9(b)
|
|
Form S-4
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Health Care Laws
|
|
|
3.10(a)
|
|
Healthcare Information Laws
|
|
|
3.10(d)
|
|
Healthcare Regulatory Approvals
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
HSR Act
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Indemnitee
|
|
|
5.9(a)
|
|
Indemnitees
|
|
|
5.9(a)
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Joint Proxy Statement
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Knowledge
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
known
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Laws
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Liens
|
|
|
3.2(b)
|
|
Marketing Period
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
3.17(b)(3)
|
|
Materials of Environmental Concern
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Merger Subs
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Mergers
|
|
|
1.2(a)
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Non-US Aristotle Benefit Plans
|
|
|
4.13(e)
|
|
Non-US Plato Benefit Plans
|
|
|
3.12(e)
|
|
NYSE
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
A-v
|
|
|
|
|
Order
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Outside Date
|
|
|
7.1(b)(i)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Parent Common Stock
|
|
|
2.2(b)
|
|
Parent DSU
|
|
|
2.9(d)
|
|
Parent PSU
|
|
|
2.9(c)
|
|
Parent RSU
|
|
|
2.9(b)
|
|
Parent SAR
|
|
|
2.10(a)
|
|
Parent Stock Option
|
|
|
2.9(a)
|
|
Per Share Cash Amount
|
|
|
2.2(e)(i)
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
Permitted Lien
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Person
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Plato
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Plato Adverse Recommendation Change
|
|
|
5.3(b)
|
|
Plato Benefit Plan
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
Plato Board
|
|
|
3.3(b)
|
|
Plato Book-Entry Shares
|
|
|
2.2(c)
|
|
Plato Business Personnel
|
|
|
3.13(a)
|
|
Plato By-laws
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Plato Capital Stock
|
|
|
3.2(a)
|
|
Plato Certificate
|
|
|
2.2(c)
|
|
Plato Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
1.4(a)
|
|
Plato Charter
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Plato Common Stock
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Plato Disclosure Letter
|
|
|
III
|
|
Plato DSUs
|
|
|
2.9(d)
|
|
Plato Effective Time
|
|
|
1.4(b)
|
|
Plato ESPP
|
|
|
2.9(e)
|
|
Plato Expenses
|
|
|
7.3(b)
|
|
Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Plato Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
III
|
|
Plato Material Intellectual Property
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Plato Merger
|
|
|
1.2(a)
|
|
Plato Merger Consideration
|
|
|
2.2(c)
|
|
Plato Merger Sub
|
|
|
Preamble
|
|
Plato Preferred Stock
|
|
|
3.2(a)
|
|
Plato PSU
|
|
|
2.9(c)
|
|
Plato Recommendation
|
|
|
3.3(b)
|
|
Plato RSU
|
|
|
2.9(b)
|
|
Plato SEC Documents
|
|
|
3.5(a)
|
|
Plato SEC Financial Statements
|
|
|
3.5(c)
|
|
Plato Stock Option
|
|
|
2.9(a)
|
|
Plato Stock Plans
|
|
|
2.9(a)
|
|
Plato Stockholder Approval
|
|
|
3.3(c)
|
|
A-vi
|
|
|
|
|
Plato Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
5.3(b)
|
|
Plato Subsidiary Insurance Agreements
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Plato Subsidiary SAP Statements
|
|
|
3.5(h)
|
|
Plato Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
1.2(a)
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
Proceeding
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Public Statement
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Refinancing Sources
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Refinancing Transaction
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Regulatory Action
|
|
|
5.8(e)
|
|
Release
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Replacement Facility
|
|
|
5.11(b)
|
|
Representatives
|
|
|
5.7(d)
|
|
Required Governmental Consents
|
|
|
6.1(e)
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
3.5(d)
|
|
SEC
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Section 203
|
|
|
3.3(b)
|
|
Section 262
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
|
3.4(a)
|
|
Stock Award Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
2.9(a)
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
|
5.4(f)(ii)
|
|
Surviving Corporations
|
|
|
1.2(a)
|
|
Takeover Laws
|
|
|
3.3(b)
|
|
Takeover Proposal
|
|
|
5.4(f)(i)
|
|
Tax Return
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
1.2(a)
|
|
Willful Breach
|
|
|
8.15(a)
|
|
A-vii
EXECUTION
COPY
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of July 20, 2011
(this Agreement), by and among EXPRESS
SCRIPTS, INC., a Delaware corporation
(Aristotle), MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., a
Delaware corporation (Plato), ARISTOTLE
HOLDING, INC., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
Subsidiary of Aristotle (Parent), ARISTOTLE
MERGER SUB, INC., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
Subsidiary of Parent (Aristotle Merger Sub)
and PLATO MERGER SUB, INC., a Delaware corporation and wholly
owned Subsidiary of Parent (Plato Merger Sub
and, together with Aristotle Merger Sub, the Merger
Subs).
W I T N E S
S E T H:
WHEREAS, in anticipation of the Mergers, Aristotle has formed
(i) Parent, (ii) Aristotle Merger Sub and
(iii) Plato Merger Sub;
WHEREAS, (i) each of Aristotle, Parent and Aristotle Merger
Sub desire, following the satisfaction or waiver of the
conditions set forth in Article VI, to effect the Aristotle
Merger upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement
whereby Aristotle Merger Sub shall be merged with and into
Aristotle, with Aristotle as the surviving entity in the
Aristotle Merger and Aristotle Surviving Corporation becoming a
wholly owned subsidiary of Parent and (ii) immediately
following consummation of the Aristotle Merger, each of Plato,
Parent and Plato Merger Sub desire, following the satisfaction
or waiver of the conditions set forth in Article VI, to
effect the Plato Merger upon the terms and conditions set forth
in this Agreement, whereby Plato Merger Sub shall be merged with
and into Plato, with Plato as the surviving entity in the Plato
Merger, and Plato Surviving Corporation becoming a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent;
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of each of Aristotle, Plato,
Parent, Aristotle Merger Sub and Plato Merger Sub have each
determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of
their respective companies and stockholders to consummate the
Mergers and the Transactions (as defined below) on the terms and
conditions set forth herein;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Plato has, subject to
Sections 5.3(b) and 5.4, unanimously resolved to recommend
the adoption of this Agreement by the Plato stockholders;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Aristotle has, subject to
Sections 5.3(c) and 5.4, unanimously resolved to recommend
the adoption of this Agreement by the Aristotle stockholders;
WHEREAS, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it is
intended that the Aristotle Merger and the Plato Merger taken
together shall qualify as an exchange within the meaning of
Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code); and
WHEREAS, Aristotle, Plato, Parent, Aristotle Merger Sub and
Plato Merger Sub desire to make certain representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Mergers and also to prescribe various conditions to the Mergers.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Aristotle,
Plato, Parent and the Merger Subs agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE
MERGERS
Section 1.1 The
Aristotle Merger.
(a) At the Aristotle Effective Time, Aristotle Merger Sub
shall be merged with and into Aristotle (the Aristotle
Merger) in accordance with the DGCL, and upon the
terms set forth in this Agreement, whereupon
the separate existence of Aristotle Merger Sub shall cease and
Aristotle shall continue as the surviving corporation (the
Aristotle Surviving Corporation). As a result
of the Aristotle Merger, the Aristotle Surviving Corporation
shall become a wholly owned Subsidiary of Parent.
(b) From and after the Aristotle Effective Time, the
Aristotle Surviving Corporation shall possess all the rights,
powers, privileges and franchises and be subject to all of the
obligations, liabilities and duties of Aristotle and Aristotle
Merger Sub, all as provided under the DGCL.
Section 1.2 The
Plato Merger.
(a) At the Plato Effective Time, Plato Merger Sub shall be
merged with and into Plato (the Plato Merger
and, together with the Aristotle Merger, the
Mergers) in accordance with the DGCL, and
upon the terms set forth in this Agreement, whereupon the
separate existence of Plato Merger Sub shall cease and Plato
shall continue as the surviving corporation (the Plato
Surviving Corporation and, together with the Aristotle
Surviving Corporation, the Surviving
Corporations). As a result of the Plato Merger, the
Plato Surviving Corporation shall become a wholly owned
Subsidiary of Parent. The Mergers and other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement are referred to herein as the
Transactions. References herein to
Aristotle or Plato with respect to the
period from and after the Aristotle Effective Time or the Plato
Effective Time, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be
references to the Aristotle Surviving Corporation or the Plato
Surviving Corporation, as the case may be.
(b) From and after the Plato Effective Time, the Plato
Surviving Corporation shall possess all the rights, powers,
privileges and franchises and be subject to all of the
obligations, liabilities and duties of Plato and Plato Merger
Sub, all as provided under the DGCL.
Section 1.3 Closing. The
closing of the Mergers (the Closing)
shall take place at the offices of Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP, Four Times Square, New York, New
York, 10036 at 9:00 a.m. local time, as soon as practicable
(but, subject to the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted
hereunder, waiver of the applicable conditions set forth in
Article VI, in any event, within three (3) Business
Days) after satisfaction or, to the extent permitted hereunder,
waiver of all applicable conditions set forth in Article VI
(except for any conditions that by their nature can only be
satisfied on the Closing Date, but subject to the satisfaction
of such conditions or waiver by the party entitled to waive such
conditions) or at such other time and place as Aristotle and
Plato shall agree; provided, however, that
notwithstanding the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted
hereunder, waiver of all applicable conditions set forth in
Article VI, neither Parent nor Aristotle shall be obligated
to effect the Closing prior to the third (3rd) Business Day
following the final day of the Marketing Period or such earlier
date as Aristotle shall request on two (2) Business
Days prior written notice to Plato (but, subject in such
case, to the satisfaction or, to the extent permitted hereunder,
waiver of all applicable conditions set forth in Article VI
(except for any conditions that by their nature can only be
satisfied on the Closing Date, but subject to the satisfaction
of such conditions or waiver by the party entitled to waive such
conditions)). The date and time on which the Closing occurs is
referred to herein as the Closing Date.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the failure of the Marketing
Period to have commenced or to have been completed shall not
constitute a condition to the parties obligations to
effect the Closing if it would cause Closing to occur after the
fourth Business Day prior to the Outside Date, as it may be
extended pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(ii).
Section 1.4 Effective
Times.
(a) On the Closing Date, each of the following filings
shall be made substantially concurrently with the other:
(i) Aristotle shall file a certificate of merger (the
Aristotle Certificate of Merger), in
accordance with Section 251 of the Delaware General
Corporate Law (the DGCL), with the
Delaware Secretary of State and make all other filings or
recordings required by the DGCL in connection with the Aristotle
Merger and (ii) Plato shall file a certificate of merger
(the Plato Certificate of Merger) with the
Delaware Secretary of State in accordance with the relevant
provisions of the DGCL and shall make all other filings or
recordings required by the DGCL in connection with the Plato
Merger.
(b) (i) The Aristotle Merger shall become effective at
such time as the Aristotle Certificate of Merger is duly filed
with the Delaware Secretary of State or at such other time as
Plato and Aristotle shall agree and
A-2
specify in the Aristotle Certificate of Merger (such time as the
Aristotle Merger becomes effective being the Aristotle
Effective Time) and (ii) immediately following
consummation of the Aristotle Merger, the Plato Merger shall
become effective at such time as the Plato Certificate of Merger
is duly filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, or at such
other time as Parent and Plato shall agree and specify in the
Plato Certificate of Merger (such time as the Plato Merger
becomes effective being the Plato Effective
Time, and such time as the Mergers become effective
being the Effective Times).
Section 1.5 Certificate
of Incorporation and By-laws.
(a) At the Aristotle Effective Time, the certificate of
incorporation of the Aristotle Surviving Corporation shall be
amended and restated pursuant to the Aristotle Merger in its
entirety as forth on Exhibit A, until thereafter changed or
amended as provided therein or by applicable law. The name of
the Aristotle Surviving Corporation immediately after the
Aristotle Effective Time shall be Express Scripts,
Inc..
(b) At the Plato Effective Time, the certificate of
incorporation of Plato Surviving Corporation shall be amended
and restated pursuant to the Plato Merger in its entirety as set
forth on Exhibit B. The name of the Plato Surviving
Corporation immediately after the Plato Effective Time shall be
Medco Health Solutions, Inc..
(c) At the Plato Effective Time, the by-laws of the Plato
Surviving Corporation shall be amended and restated pursuant to
the Plato Merger to be identical to the by-laws of the Plato
Merger Sub, except that such by-laws shall be amended to contain
provisions concerning exculpation, indemnification and
advancement of expenses identical to those in Platos
by-laws as of the date of this Agreement. At the Aristotle
Effective Time, the by-laws of Aristotle Surviving Corporation
shall be amended and restated pursuant to the Aristotle Merger
to be identical to the bylaws of the Aristotle Merger Sub.
(d) Each of the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of
Parent at the Aristotle Effective Time shall be in the form set
forth in Exhibit C attached hereto, and the name of Parent
immediately after such time shall be Express Scripts
Holding Company.
Section 1.6 Directors
and Officers of the Surviving Corporations.
(a) From and after the Plato Effective Time, until
successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified in
accordance with applicable law, (i) the directors of Plato
Merger Sub at the Plato Effective Time shall be the directors of
the Plato Surviving Corporation and (ii) the officers of
Plato at the Plato Effective Time shall be the officers of the
Plato Surviving Corporation, except as set forth on
Schedule 1.6(a) hereto, as may be updated by Aristotle by
written notice to Plato prior to the Plato Effective Time.
(b) From and after the Aristotle Effective Time, until
successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified in
accordance with applicable law, (i) the directors of
Aristotle Merger Sub at the Aristotle Effective Time shall be
the directors of the Aristotle Surviving Corporation and
(ii) the officers of Aristotle at the Aristotle Effective
Time shall be the officers of the Aristotle Surviving
Corporation.
(c) Until successors are duly elected or appointed and
qualified in accordance with applicable law, (a) the
directors of Aristotle immediately before the Aristotle
Effective Time shall be the directors of Parent immediately
after the Aristotle Effective Time, except that two independent
directors of Plato, designated by Aristotle prior to the
Aristotle Effective Time, shall be appointed directors of Parent
immediately following the Effective Times and (b) the
officers of Aristotle immediately before the Aristotle Effective
Time shall be the officers of Parent immediately after the
Aristotle Effective Time.
ARTICLE II
EFFECT ON
THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT CORPORATIONS;
EXCHANGE
OF CERTIFICATES
Section 2.1 Effect
on Capital Stock of Aristotle and Aristotle Merger
Sub. At the Aristotle Effective Time, by
virtue of the Aristotle Merger and without any action on the
part of Aristotle, Parent, Aristotle
A-3
Merger Sub or any holder of any shares of Aristotle common
stock, $0.01 par value per share (Aristotle Common
Stock):
(a) All shares of Aristotle Common Stock that are held by
Aristotle as treasury stock or that are owned by Aristotle,
Aristotle Merger Sub or any other wholly owned Subsidiary of
Aristotle immediately prior to the Aristotle Effective Time
shall cease to be outstanding and shall be cancelled and retired
and shall cease to exist, and no consideration shall be
delivered in exchange therefor.
(b) Subject to Sections 2.1(a), 2.4 and 2.10, each
share of Aristotle Common Stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Aristotle Effective Time shall be
converted into one fully paid and nonassessable share of Parent
Common Stock (the Aristotle Merger
Consideration).
(c) Each share of Aristotle Merger Sub common stock issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the Aristotle Effective
Time shall be converted into one share of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share, of Aristotle Surviving Corporation.
(d) All of the shares of Aristotle Common Stock converted
into Parent Common Stock pursuant to this Section 2.1 shall
cease to be outstanding and shall cease to exist and, as of the
Aristotle Effective Time, the holders of Aristotle Common Stock
shall be deemed to have received shares of Parent Common Stock
(without the requirement for the surrender of any certificate
previously representing any such shares of Aristotle Common
Stock or issuance of new certificates representing Parent Common
Stock), with each certificate representing shares of Aristotle
Common Stock (an Aristotle Certificate) prior
to the Aristotle Effective Time being deemed to represent
automatically an equivalent number of shares of Parent Common
Stock.
Section 2.2 Effect
on Capital Stock of Plato and Plato Merger
Sub. At the Plato Effective Time, by virtue
of the Plato Merger and without any action on the part of Plato,
Parent, Plato Merger Sub or any holder of any shares of Plato
common stock, $0.01 par value per share (Plato
Common Stock):
(a) All shares of Plato Common Stock that are held by Plato
as treasury stock or that are owned by Plato, Plato Merger Sub
or any wholly owned Subsidiary of Plato immediately prior to the
Plato Effective Time shall cease to be outstanding and shall be
cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no
consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor.
(b) Subject to Sections 2.2(a), 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, each
share of Plato Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the Plato Effective Time (including any shares of Plato
Common Stock held in a Plato Benefit Plan or related trust)
shall be converted into and shall thereafter represent the
following consideration: (i) the right to receive an amount
in cash equal to the Per Share Cash Amount and (ii) that
number of validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share of Parent
(Parent Common Stock) in an amount equal to
the Exchange Ratio.
(c) The shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued, and
cash payable, upon the conversion of shares of Plato Common
Stock pursuant to this Section 2.2 and cash in lieu of
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock as contemplated by
Section 2.5 are referred to collectively as Plato
Merger Consideration. As of the Plato Effective Time,
all such shares of Plato Common Stock shall cease to be
outstanding and shall cease to exist, and each holder of a
certificate representing any such shares of Plato Common Stock
(a Plato Certificate) or shares of
Plato Common Stock held in book entry form (Plato
Book-Entry Shares) shall cease to have any rights with
respect thereto, except the right to receive, in accordance with
Section 2.2(b), the Plato Merger Consideration and any
other amounts herein provided, upon surrender of such Plato
Certificate, without interest.
(d) Each share of Plato Merger Sub common stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time shall
be converted into one share of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of the Plato Surviving Corporation.
(e) For purposes of this Agreement:
(i) Per Share Cash Amount
means $28.80.
(ii) Exchange Ratio means
0.81.
A-4
Section 2.3 Effect
on Parent Capital Stock. At the Aristotle
Effective Time, each share of capital stock of Parent issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Aristotle Effective Time
shall remain outstanding. Immediately following the Aristotle
Effective Time, shares of capital stock of Parent owned by
Aristotle Surviving Corporation shall be surrendered to Parent
without payment therefor.
Section 2.4 Certain
Adjustments. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, if, from the date of this Agreement
until the Effective Times, the outstanding shares of Parent
Common Stock, Aristotle Common Stock or Plato Common Stock shall
have been changed into a different number of shares or a
different class by reason of any reclassification, stock split
(including a reverse stock split), recapitalization,
split-up,
combination, exchange of shares, readjustment, or other similar
transaction, or a stock dividend or stock distribution thereon
shall be declared with a record date within said period, the
Plato Merger Consideration and the Exchange Ratio and any other
similarly dependent items, as the case may be, shall be
equitably adjusted to provide the holders of Aristotle Common
Stock and Plato Common Stock the same economic effect as
contemplated by this Agreement prior to such event.
Section 2.5 Fractional
Shares. No certificates or scrip representing
fractional shares of Parent Common Stock shall be issued upon
the conversion of Plato Common Stock pursuant to
Section 2.2, and such fractional share interests shall not
entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any rights of a holder
of Parent Common Stock. All fractional shares to which a single
record holder of Plato Common Stock would be otherwise entitled
to receive shall be aggregated and calculations shall be rounded
to three decimal places. In lieu of any such fractional shares,
each holder of Plato Common Stock who would otherwise be
entitled to such fractional shares shall be entitled to an
amount in cash, without interest, rounded down to the nearest
cent, equal to the product of (A) the amount of the
fractional share interest in a share of Parent Common Stock to
which such holder is entitled under Section 2.2(b) (or
would be entitled but for this Section 2.5) and (B) an
amount equal to the average of the closing sale prices of the
Aristotle Common Stock on the NASDAQ for each of the fifteen
(15) consecutive trading days ending with the fourth (4th)
complete trading day prior to the Closing Date. As soon as
practicable after the determination of the amount of cash, if
any, to be paid to holders of Plato Common Stock in lieu of any
fractional share interests in Parent Common Stock, the Exchange
Agent shall make available such amounts, without interest, to
the holders of Plato Common Stock entitled to receive such cash.
Section 2.6 Dissenting
Shares. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, shares (Appraisal
Shares) of Plato Common Stock that are outstanding
immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time and that are held
by any Person who is entitled to demand and properly demands
appraisal of such Appraisal Shares pursuant to, and who complies
in all respects with, Section 262 of the DGCL
(Section 262) shall not be converted
into Plato Merger Consideration as provided in Section 2.2,
but rather the holders of Appraisal Shares shall be entitled to
payment by the Plato Surviving Corporation of the fair
value of such Appraisal Shares in accordance with
Section 262; provided, however, that if any
such holder shall fail to perfect or otherwise shall waive,
withdraw or lose the right to appraisal under Section 262,
then the right of such holder to be paid the fair value of such
holders Appraisal Shares shall cease and such Appraisal
Shares shall be deemed to have been converted as of the Plato
Effective Time into, and to have become exchangeable solely for
the right to receive, Plato Merger Consideration as provided in
Section 2.2(b). Plato shall serve prompt notice to
Aristotle of any demands received by Plato for appraisal of any
shares of Plato Common Stock, and Aristotle shall have the right
to participate in all negotiations and Proceedings with respect
to such demands. Prior to the Plato Effective Time, Plato shall
not, without the prior written consent of Aristotle, make any
payment with respect to, or settle or offer to settle, any such
demands, or agree to do any of the foregoing.
Section 2.7 Exchange
of Plato Certificates.
(a) Prior to the Plato Effective Time, Parent shall deposit
with a nationally recognized financial institution designated by
Parent and reasonably acceptable to Plato (the Exchange
Agent), it being agreed by the parties that the
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company is
acceptable, for the benefit of the holders of shares of Plato
Common Stock, for exchange in accordance with this
Article II, through the Exchange Agent, subject to
Section 2.7(b)(ii), certificates representing the full
number of shares of Parent Common Stock issuable
A-5
pursuant to Section 2.2 in exchange for outstanding shares
of Plato Common Stock. Prior to the Plato Effective Time,
Aristotle shall provide or shall cause to be provided to the
Exchange Agent all of the cash necessary to pay the cash portion
of the Plato Merger Consideration, and Parent shall, after the
Plato Effective Time on the appropriate payment date, if
applicable, provide or cause to be provided to the Exchange
Agent any dividends or other distributions payable on such
shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to Section 2.7(c)
(such shares of Parent Common Stock and cash provided to the
Exchange Agent, together with any dividends or other
distributions with respect thereto, being hereinafter referred
to as the Exchange Fund). For the
purposes of such initial deposit, Aristotle shall assume that
there will not be any fractional shares of Parent Common Stock.
Parent shall make available to the Exchange Agent, for addition
to the Exchange Fund, from time to time as needed, cash
sufficient to pay cash in lieu of fractional shares in
accordance with Section 2.5. Parent shall cause the
Exchange Agent to deliver the Parent Common Stock and cash
contemplated to be issued pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.5
out of the Exchange Fund. The Exchange Fund shall not be used
for any other purpose.
(b) Exchange Procedures.
(i) Plato Certificates. Parent
shall instruct the Exchange Agent to mail, as soon as reasonably
practicable after the Plato Effective Time, to each holder of
record of a Plato Certificate whose shares were converted into
the Parent Common Stock portion of Plato Merger Consideration
and the right to receive the cash portion of the Plato Merger
Consideration pursuant to Sections 2.2(b) and 2.5,
(i) a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that
delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
Plato Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the Plato
Certificates to the Exchange Agent and shall be in customary
form and have such other provisions as are reasonably
satisfactory to both of Plato and Aristotle) and
(ii) instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the
Plato Certificates in exchange for Plato Merger Consideration.
Upon surrender of a Plato Certificate for cancellation to the
Exchange Agent or to such other agent or agents as may be
appointed by Parent, together with such letter of transmittal,
duly executed, and such other documents as may reasonably be
required by the Exchange Agent, the holder of such Plato
Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor,
and Parent shall cause the Exchange Agent to pay and deliver in
exchange thereof as promptly as practicable (A) the Per
Share Cash Amount, (B) the number of whole shares of Parent
Common Stock (which shall be in non-certificated book entry form
unless a physical certificate is requested) representing, in the
aggregate, the whole number of shares that such holder has the
right to receive pursuant to Section 2.2(b)(ii) (after
taking into account all shares of Plato Common Stock then held
by such holder), (C) any dividends or other distributions
payable pursuant to Section 2.7(c)(i) and (D) cash in
lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock payable
pursuant to Section 2.5, and the Plato Certificate so
surrendered shall forthwith be cancelled. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of Plato Common Stock that is not
registered in the transfer records of Plato, payment may be made
and shares may be issued to a Person other than the Person in
whose name the Plato Certificate so surrendered is registered,
if such Plato Certificate shall be properly endorsed or
otherwise be in proper form for transfer and the Person
requesting such payment shall pay any transfer or other taxes
required by reason of the payment to a Person other than the
registered holder of such Plato Certificate or establish to the
satisfaction of Parent that such tax has been paid or is not
applicable. Subject to Section 2.6, until surrendered as
contemplated by this Section 2.7, each Plato Certificate
shall be deemed at any time after the Plato Effective Time to
represent only the Parent Common Stock portion of the Plato
Merger Consideration and the right to receive upon such
surrender the cash portion of the Plato Merger Consideration, in
each case, into which the shares of Plato Common Stock
theretofore represented by such Plato Certificate have been
converted pursuant to Section 2.2(b), dividends or other
distributions payable pursuant to Section 2.7(c)(i) and
cash in lieu of any fractional shares payable pursuant to
Section 2.5. No interest shall be paid or accrue on any
cash payable upon surrender of any Plato Certificate.
(ii) Book-Entry
Shares. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained in this Agreement, any holder of Plato
Book-Entry Shares shall not be required to deliver a Plato
Certificate or an executed letter of transmittal to the Exchange
Agent to receive the Plato Merger Consideration that such holder
is entitled to receive pursuant to this Article II. In lieu
thereof, each holder of record of one or more Plato Book-Entry
Shares whose shares of Plato Common Stock were converted into
the right to receive the Plato Merger Consideration and any
dividends or other distributions payable pursuant to
Section 2.7(c)(ii) shall
A-6
automatically upon the Plato Effective Time (or, at any later
time at which such Plato Book-Entry Shares shall be so
converted) be entitled to receive, and Parent shall cause the
Exchange Agent to pay and deliver as promptly as practicable
after the Plato Effective Time, in respect of each share of
Plato Common Stock (A) the Per Share Cash Amount,
(B) the number or shares of Parent Common Stock (which
shall be in uncertificated book-entry form unless a physical
certificate is requested by such holder of record) representing,
in the aggregate, the whole number of shares that such holder
has the right to receive pursuant to Section 2.7(b),
(C) any dividends or distributions payable pursuant to
Section 2.7(c)(ii) and (D) cash in lieu of any
fractional shares payable pursuant to Section 2.5, and the
Plato Book-Entry Shares of such holder shall forthwith be
canceled.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares
(i) Plato Certificates. No
dividends or other distributions with respect to Parent Common
Stock with a record date after the Plato Effective Time shall be
paid to the holder of any certificate formerly representing
Plato Common Stock, and no cash payment in lieu of fractional
shares shall be paid to any such holder pursuant to
Section 2.5, until the surrender of such Plato Certificate
in accordance with this Article II. Subject to applicable
Law, following surrender of any such Plato Certificate, there
shall be paid to the holder of the shares of Parent Common Stock
issued in exchange therefor, without interest, (i) at the
time of such surrender, the amount of any cash payable in lieu
of a fractional share of Parent Common Stock to which such
holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.5 and the amount
of dividends or other distributions with a record date after the
Plato Effective Time theretofore paid with respect to such whole
shares of Parent Common Stock and (ii) at the appropriate
payment date, the amount of dividends or other distributions
with a record date after the Plato Effective Time but prior to
such surrender and a payment date subsequent to such surrender
payable with respect to shares of Parent Common Stock.
(ii) Book-Entry Shares. Holders of
Plato Book-Entry Shares who are entitled to receive shares of
Parent Common Stock under this Article II shall be paid
(A) at the time of payment and delivery of such Parent
Common Stock by the Exchange Agent under Section 2.7(b),
the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record
date after the Plato Effective Time theretofore paid with
respect to such shares of Parent Common Stock, and the amount of
any cash payable in lieu of a fractional share of Parent Common
Stock to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Section 2.5 and (B) at the appropriate payment date,
the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record
date after the Plato Effective Time but prior to the time of
such payment and delivery by the Exchange Agent under
Section 2.7(b) and a payment date subsequent to the time of
such payment and delivery by the Exchange Agent under
Section 2.7(b) payable with respect to shares of Parent
Common Stock.
(d) The Plato Merger Consideration issued (and paid) in
accordance with the terms of this Article II upon the
surrender of the Plato Certificates (or, automatically, in the
case of the Plato Book-Entry Shares) shall be deemed to have
been issued (and paid) in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to such shares of Plato Common Stock (other than the
right to receive the payments and deliveries contemplated by
this Article II). After the Plato Effective Time there
shall be no further registration of transfers on the stock
transfer books of Plato Surviving Corporation of shares of Plato
Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the
Plato Effective Time. If, after the Plato Effective Time, any
Plato Certificates formerly representing shares of Plato Common
Stock are presented to the Plato Surviving Corporation or the
Exchange Agent for any reason, they shall be cancelled and
exchanged as provided in this Article II.
(e) Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains
undistributed to the holders of Plato Common Stock for six
(6) months after the Plato Effective Time shall be
delivered to Parent, upon demand, and any holder of Plato Common
Stock who has not theretofore complied with this Article II
shall thereafter look only to Parent for payment of its claim
for the Plato Merger Consideration and any dividends or
distributions with respect to Parent Common Stock as
contemplated by Section 2.7(c).
(f) None of Aristotle, Parent, the Merger Subs, Plato or
the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any Person in respect of
any shares of Parent Common Stock (or dividends or distributions
with respect thereto) or cash from the Exchange Fund (including
any amounts delivered to Aristotle in accordance with
Section 2.2(e)) properly delivered to a public official
pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar Law.
A-7
(g) In the event any Plato Certificate shall have been
lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of
that fact by the Person claiming such Plato Certificate to be
lost, stolen or destroyed and, to the extent customarily
required by Parent or Aristotle, the posting by such Person of a
bond in reasonable amount as indemnity against any claim that
may be made against it with respect to such Plato Certificate,
the Exchange Agent will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen
or destroyed Plato Certificate the shares of Parent Common Stock
and the cash, unpaid dividends or other distributions that would
be payable or deliverable in respect thereof pursuant to this
Agreement had such lost, stolen or destroyed Plato Certificate
been surrendered as provided in this Article II.
(h) The Exchange Agent shall invest any cash included in
the Exchange Fund, as directed by Parent, on a daily basis. Any
interest and other income resulting from such investments shall
be paid to Parent; provided that no such investment or
losses thereon shall affect the Plato Merger Consideration
payable to holders of Plato Common Stock entitled to receive
such consideration, including cash in lieu of fractional
interests, and Parent shall promptly cause to be provided
additional funds to the Exchange Agent for the benefit of
holders of shares of Plato Common Stock entitled to receive such
consideration in the amount of any such losses or if for any
reason such funds are unavailable for payment to the holders of
shares of Plato Common Stock.
(i) Parent shall be entitled to deduct and withhold from
the consideration otherwise payable to any holder of Plato
Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement such amounts as may be
required to be deducted and withheld with respect to the making
of such payment under the Code, or under any provision of state,
local or foreign tax Law. Any amount properly deducted or
withheld pursuant to this Section 2.7(i) shall be treated
as having been paid to the holder of Plato Common Stock in
respect of which such deduction or withholding was made. In the
case of any amounts properly withheld from any payments not
consisting entirely of cash, Parent shall be treated as though
it withheld an appropriate amount of Parent Common Stock
otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to any holder of
Plato Common Stock, sold such Parent Common Stock for an amount
of cash equal to its fair market value at the time of such
deemed sale and paid such cash proceeds to the holder of Plato
Common Stock in respect of which such deduction or withholding
was made. Parent shall pay, or shall cause to be paid, all
amounts so deducted or withheld to the appropriate taxing
authority within the period required under applicable Law.
(j) Each Aristotle Certificate immediately prior to the
Aristotle Effective Time shall, from and after the Aristotle
Effective Time, represent shares of Parent Common Stock
constituting the Aristotle Merger Consideration. At the
Aristotle Effective Time, the Exchange Agent shall exchange by
book entry transfer all uncertificated shares of Aristotle
Common Stock (excluding any shares of Aristotle Common Stock to
be canceled pursuant to Section 2.1(a)) for shares of
Parent Common Stock constituting the Aristotle Merger
Consideration; provided, however, that if an
exchange of Aristotle Certificates for new certificates is
required by Law or applicable rule or regulation, or is desired
at any time by Parent, in its sole discretion, Parent shall
arrange for such exchange on a
one-for-one-share
basis. For the avoidance of doubt, from and after the Aristotle
Effective Time, the holders of such Aristotle Certificates which
have been exchanged for certificates of Parent Common Stock, as
well as those shares of Aristotle Common Stock exchanged by book
entry pursuant to this Section 2.7(j), shall be entitled to
receive dividends and distributions made with respect to shares
of Parent Common Stock.
Section 2.8 Further
Assurances. At and after the Effective Times,
the officers and directors of Parent, the Aristotle Surviving
Corporation or the Plato Surviving Corporation, as applicable,
shall be authorized to execute and deliver, in the name and on
behalf of the Aristotle Surviving Corporation, Aristotle Merger
Sub or Aristotle, or the Plato Surviving Corporation, Plato
Merger Sub or Plato, any deeds, bills of sale, assignments or
assurances and to take and do, in the name and on behalf of the
Aristotle Surviving Corporation, Aristotle Merger Sub or
Aristotle, or the Plato Surviving Corporation, Plato Merger Sub
or Plato, any other actions and things necessary to vest,
perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in Parent, the
Aristotle Surviving Corporation or the Plato Surviving
Corporation any and all right, title and interest in, to and
under any of the rights, properties or assets acquired or to be
acquired by Parent, the Aristotle Surviving Corporation or the
Plato Surviving Corporation, as applicable, as a result of, or
in connection with, the Transactions, including the Mergers.
A-8
Section 2.9 Plato
Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards.
(a) As of the Plato Effective Time, each option to acquire
shares of Plato Common Stock (a Plato Stock
Option) granted under the Plato 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended, the Accredo 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the
Accredo 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Accredo Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (the Plato
Stock Plans) that is outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time, whether or not
then vested or exercisable, shall be assumed by Parent and shall
be converted into a stock option (a Parent Stock
Option) to acquire Parent Common Stock in accordance
with this Section 2.9. Each such Parent Stock Option as so
assumed and converted shall continue to have, and shall be
subject to, the same terms and conditions as applied to the
Plato Stock Option immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time
(but, taking into account any changes thereto provided for in
the Plato Stock Plans, in any award agreement or in such Plato
Stock Option by reason of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby). As of the Plato Effective Time, each such
Parent Stock Option as so assumed and converted shall be for
that number of whole shares of Parent Common Stock (rounded down
to the nearest whole share) equal to the product of (i) the
number of shares of Plato Common Stock subject to such Plato
Stock Option and (ii) the Stock Award Exchange Ratio, at an
exercise price per share of Parent Common Stock (rounded up to
the nearest whole cent) equal to the quotient obtained by
dividing (x) the exercise price per share of Plato Common
Stock of such Plato Stock Option by (y) the Stock Award
Exchange Ratio; provided, that the exercise price and the
number of shares of Parent Common Stock subject to the Parent
Stock Option shall be determined in a manner consistent with the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code, and, in the case
of Plato Stock Options that are intended to qualify as incentive
stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the
Code, consistent with the requirements of Section 424 of
the Code. For purposes of this Agreement, Stock Award
Exchange Ratio means the sum of the Exchange Ratio and
the Cash Portion Exchange Ratio. The Cash Portion
Exchange Ratio means the quotient obtained by dividing
(1) the Per Share Cash Amount and (2) an amount equal
to the average of the closing sale prices of the Aristotle
Common Stock on the NASDAQ for each of the fifteen
(15) consecutive trading days ending with the fourth (4th)
complete trading day prior to the Closing Date.
(b) As of the Plato Effective Time, each restricted stock
unit award granted under the Plato Stock Plans (Plato
RSU) that is outstanding immediately prior to the
Plato Effective Time that is not then vested shall be assumed by
Parent and shall be converted into a restricted stock unit award
(a Parent RSU) to acquire Parent Common
Stock in accordance with this Section 2.9. Each such Parent
RSU as so assumed and converted shall continue to have, and
shall be subject to, the same terms and conditions as applied to
the Plato RSU immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time
(but, taking into account any changes thereto provided for in
the Plato Stock Plans, in any award agreement or in such Plato
RSU by reason of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby). As of the Plato Effective Time, each such Parent RSU as
so assumed and converted shall be for that number of shares of
Parent Common Stock equal to the product of (i) the number
of shares of Plato Common Stock underlying to such Plato RSU
multiplied by (ii) the Stock Award Exchange Ratio.
(c) As of the Plato Effective Time, each performance stock
unit award granted under the Plato Stock Plans (Plato
PSU) that is outstanding immediately prior to the
Plato Effective Time, whether or not then vested, shall be
assumed by Parent and shall be converted into a performance
share unit award (a Parent PSU) to acquire
Parent Common Stock in accordance with this Section 2.9.
Each such Parent PSU as so assumed and converted shall continue
to have, and shall be subject to, the same terms and conditions
as applied to the Plato PSU immediately prior to the Plato
Effective Time (but, taking into account any changes thereto
provided for in the Plato Stock Plans, in any award agreement or
in such Plato PSU by reason of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby); provided, that if,
after the Plato Effective Time, the Agile program is
discontinued or the performance metrics applicable to such Plato
PSU otherwise cease to be measurable on the same terms as
immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time, then such Plato
PSU shall be valued based on target performance, and shall be
paid out at the time, and subject to any applicable payment
conditions, prescribed by the terms in effect for such Plato PSU
immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time; provided,
further, that such Plato PSUs shall be subject to any
payment delays required by Section 409A of the Code. As of
the Plato Effective Time, each such Parent PSU as so assumed and
converted shall be for that
A-9
number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the product of
(i) the number of shares of Plato Common Stock underlying
to such Plato PSU multiplied by (ii) the Stock Award
Exchange Ratio.
(d) As of the Plato Effective Time, each vested Plato RSU
that has not been settled and is subject to a deferral election
(the Plato DSUs), shall be assumed by Parent
and shall be converted into the right to acquire Parent Common
Stock (a Parent DSU), in accordance with this
Section 2.9. Each such Parent DSU as so assumed and
converted shall continue to have, and shall be subject to, the
same terms and conditions as applied to the Plato DSU
immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time (but, taking into
account any changes thereto provided for in the Plato Stock
Plans, in any award agreement or in such Plato DSU by reason of
this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby). As of
the Plato Effective Time, each such Parent DSU as so assumed and
converted shall be for that number of shares of Parent Common
Stock equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of
Plato Common Stock subject to such Plato DSU multiplied by
(ii) the Stock Award Exchange Ratio.
(e) The right to acquire shares of Plato Common Stock under
the Plato Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plato
ESPP) is not a Plato Stock Option for purposes of this
Agreement. Prior to the Closing Date, the Plato Board (or, if
appropriate, any committee administering the Plato ESPP) shall
adopt such resolutions or take such other actions as may be
required to provide that, with respect to the Plato ESPP:
(i) each individual participating in the offering period
(as defined in the Plato ESPP) in progress as of, the Closing
Date (the Final Offering) shall receive
notice of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement no
later than twenty (20) days prior to the Closing Date and
shall have an opportunity to terminate his or her outstanding
purchase rights under the ESPP; (ii) the Final Offering
shall end on no later than the tenth (10th) Business Day prior
to the Closing Date; (iii) each Plato ESPP
participants accumulated contributions under the ESPP
shall be used to purchase shares of Plato Common Stock in
accordance with the terms of the Plato ESPP as of the end of the
Final Offering; (iv) the applicable purchase price for
Plato Common Stock as set forth in the Plato ESPP shall not be
decreased below the levels set forth in the Plato ESPP as of the
date of this Agreement and (v) the Plato ESPP shall
terminate immediately following the end of the Final Offering
and no further rights shall be granted or exercised under the
Plato ESPP thereafter.
(f) Not later than the Closing Date, Aristotle shall, or
shall cause Parent to, deliver to the holders of Plato Stock
Options, Plato RSUs, Plato PSUs and any Plato DSUs any required
notices setting forth such holders rights pursuant to the
relevant Plato Stock Plans and award documents and stating that
such Plato Stock Options, Plato RSUs, Plato PSUs and any Plato
DSUs have been assumed by Parent and shall continue in effect on
the same terms and conditions (subject to the adjustments
required by this Section 2.9 after giving effect to the
Mergers and the terms of the relevant Plato Stock Plans).
(g) Prior to the Plato Effective Time, Plato shall take all
necessary action for the adjustment of Plato Stock Options,
Plato RSUs, Plato PSUs and any Plato DSUs under this
Section 2.9. Aristotle shall, or shall cause Parent to,
reserve for future issuance a number of shares of Parent Common
Stock at least equal to the number of shares of Parent Common
Stock that will be subject to Parent Stock Options, Parent RSUs,
Parent PSUs and Parent DSUs as a result of the actions
contemplated by this Section 2.9. Not later than the
Closing Date, Aristotle shall, or shall cause Parent to, file an
effective registration statement on
Form S-8
(or other applicable form) with respect to the shares of Parent
Common Stock subject to such Parent Stock Options, Parent RSUs,
Parent PSUs and Parent DSUs shall distribute a prospectus
relating to such
Form S-8,
and Aristotle shall, or shall cause Parent to, use reasonable
best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such registration
statement or registration statements (and maintain the current
status of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein) for
so long as such Parent Stock Options, Parent RSUs, Parent PSUs
and Parent DSUs remain outstanding.
Section 2.10 Aristotle
Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards.
(a) As of the Aristotle Effective Time, (i) each stock
option and stock appreciation right outstanding under any stock
option or compensation plan or arrangement of Aristotle (each,
an Aristotle Stock Option and
Aristotle SAR, respectively) that is
outstanding immediately prior to the Aristotle Effective Time,
whether or not then vested or exercisable, shall cease to
represent a right to acquire Aristotle Common Stock and shall be
converted automatically into Parent Stock Options or Parent
Stock Appreciation Rights (each, a
A-10
Parent SAR), as the case may be, on
substantially the same terms and conditions including vesting
schedule and per share exercise price) as applied to such
Aristotle Stock Option or Aristotle SAR immediately prior to the
Aristotle Effective Time, (ii) each share of Aristotle
restricted stock and each restricted stock unit of Aristotle
(Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards) that is
outstanding under any stock option or compensation plan,
agreement or arrangement of Aristotle immediately prior to the
Aristotle Effective Time, whether or not then vested, shall
cease to represent a share of Aristotle restricted stock or an
Aristotle restricted stock unit and shall be converted
automatically into a Parent Restricted Stock Award, on
substantially the same terms and conditions (including vesting
schedule) as applied to such Aristotle restricted stock or
restricted stock unit immediately prior to the Aristotle
Effective Time and (iii) each Aristotle performance share
award (Aristotle Performance Share Award)
shall cease to represent a share of Aristotle Common Stock and
shall be converted automatically into a Parent Performance Share
Award on substantially the same terms and conditions as applied
to such Aristotle performance award immediately prior to the
Aristotle Effective Time.
(b) Not later than the Closing Date, Parent shall deliver
to the holders of Aristotle Stock Options, Aristotle SARs,
Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards and Aristotle Performance
Share Awards any required notices setting forth such
holders rights pursuant to the relevant Aristotle Stock
Plans and award documents and stating that such Aristotle Stock
Options, Aristotle SARs, Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards and
Aristotle Performance Share Awards have been assumed by Parent
and shall continue in effect on the same terms and conditions
(subject to the adjustments required by this Section 2.10
after giving effect to the Mergers and the terms of the relevant
Aristotle Stock Plans).
(c) Prior to the Aristotle Effective Time, Aristotle shall
take all necessary action for the adjustment of Aristotle Stock
Options, Aristotle SARs, Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards and
Aristotle Performance Share Awards under this Section 2.10.
Parent shall reserve for future issuance a number of shares of
Parent Common Stock at least equal to the number of shares of
Parent Common Stock that will be subject to Aristotle Stock
Options, Aristotle SARs, Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards and
Aristotle Performance Share Awards as a result of the actions
contemplated by this Section 2.10. Not later than the
Closing Date, Parent shall file an effective registration
statement on
Form S-8
(or other applicable form) with respect to the shares of Parent
Common Stock subject to such Parent Stock Options, Parent SAR,
Parent Restricted Stock Awards and Parent Performance Share
Awards and shall distribute a prospectus relating to such
Form S-8,
and Parent shall use reasonable best efforts to maintain the
effectiveness of such registration statement or registration
statements (and maintain the current status of the prospectus or
prospectuses contained therein) for so long as such Parent Stock
Options, Parent SAR, Parent Restricted Stock Awards and Parent
Performance Share Awards remain outstanding.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF PLATO
Except as disclosed in (a) the disclosure letter delivered
by Plato to Aristotle and Parent (the Plato Disclosure
Letter) prior to the execution of this Agreement (with
specific reference to the section of this Agreement to which the
information stated in such disclosure relates; provided
that (i) disclosure in any section of such Plato Disclosure
Letter shall be deemed to be disclosed with respect to any other
section of this Agreement only to the extent that it is
reasonably apparent on the face of the Plato Disclosure Letter
that such disclosure is applicable to such other section
notwithstanding the omission of a reference or cross reference
thereto and (ii) the mere inclusion of an item in such
Plato Disclosure Letter as an exception to a representation or
warranty shall not be deemed an admission that such item
represents a material exception or material fact, event or
circumstance or that such item has had, would have or would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Plato and its Subsidiaries (a Plato Material
Adverse Effect)) or (b) the Plato SEC Documents
filed with the SEC after January 1, 2011 and prior to
July 15, 2011, the relevance of such disclosure being
reasonably apparent on its face, but excluding (x) any
disclosure contained in any such Plato SEC Documents under the
heading Risk Factors or Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements or similar heading
and any other disclosures contained or referenced therein of
information, factors or risks that are predictive, cautionary or
forward looking; (y) Plato SEC Financial Statements (other
A-11
than the notes thereto); and (z) all exhibits and schedules
thereto and documents incorporated by reference therein;
provided, however, that the disclosures in the
Plato SEC Documents shall not be deemed to qualify any
representation or warranties made in Sections 3.1, 3.2,
3.3, 3.4, 3.5(b), 3.5(c), 3.5(d), 3.6, 3.20 or 3.21, Plato
represents and warrants to Aristotle, Parent, and the Merger
Subs as follows:
Section 3.1 Corporate
Organization. Each of Plato and its
Subsidiaries (as defined below) is a corporation or other entity
duly organized, validly existing and, to the extent applicable,
in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its
organization and has the requisite corporate or other entity
power and authority to own or lease all of its properties and
assets and to carry on its business as it is now being
conducted. Each of Plato and its Subsidiaries is duly licensed
or qualified to do business in each jurisdiction in which the
nature of the business conducted by it or the character or
location of the properties and assets owned or leased by it
makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except where
the failure to be so licensed or qualified is not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably likely to have a Plato Material
Adverse Effect. The copies of the Certificate of Incorporation
and By-laws of Plato (the Plato Charter and
Plato By-laws), as most recently filed with
the Plato SEC Documents, are true, complete and correct copies
of such documents as in effect as of the date of this Agreement.
Section 3.2 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Plato consists of
2,000,000,000 shares of Plato Common Stock and
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share (the Plato Preferred Stock, and
together with Plato Common Stock, the Plato Capital
Stock). As of July 19, 2011, there were
(i) 671,151,664 shares of Plato Common Stock and no
shares of Plato Preferred Stock issued and outstanding,
(ii) 60,139,546 shares of Plato Common Stock reserved
for issuance pursuant to the Plato Stock Plans, including
(A) 30,343,734 shares of Plato Common Stock issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding Plato Stock Options (whether or
not presently exercisable), (B) 4,471,601 shares of
Plato Common Stock issuable upon vesting of outstanding Plato
RSUs, (C) 214,100 shares of Plato Common Stock
issuable upon vesting of outstanding Plato PSUs,
(D) 706,065 shares of Plato Common Stock issuable
pursuant to Plato DSUs and (E) 4,490,926 shares of
Plato Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options under the
Plato ESPP, and (iii) 285,620,728 shares of Plato
Common Stock are owned by Plato as treasury stock. Except as set
forth above, no shares of capital stock or other equity
securities of Plato are issued, reserved for issuance or
outstanding, except for shares of capital stock of Plato issued
after the date set forth in the previous sentence, pursuant to
the exercise of options under the Plato ESPP outstanding as of
the date set forth in the previous sentence. All of the issued
and outstanding shares of Plato Common Stock have been, and any
shares of Plato Common Stock issued upon the exercise of Plato
Stock Options or upon the exercise of options under the Plato
ESPP, Plato Common Stock issued pursuant to the exercise or
vesting of any Plato DSUs, or the vesting of any Plato RSUs or
Plato PSUs will be, duly authorized and validly issued and are
or will be fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive
rights. Except as set forth above or in Section 3.2(a) of
the Plato Disclosure Letter, as of the Plato Effective Time,
there will not be any outstanding securities, options, warrants,
calls, rights, commitments, agreements, derivative contracts,
forward sale contracts or undertakings of any kind to which
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries is a party, or by which Plato
or any of its Subsidiaries is bound, obligating Plato or any of
its Subsidiaries to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of capital stock or
other voting securities of Plato or of any Subsidiary of Plato
or obligating Plato or any Subsidiary of Plato to issue, grant,
extend or enter into any such security, option, warrant, call,
right, commitment, agreement, derivative contract, forward sale
contract or undertaking, or obligating Plato to make any payment
based on or resulting from the value or price of the Plato
Common Stock or of any such security, option, warrant, call,
right, commitment, agreement, derivative contract, forward sale
contract or undertaking. Except for acquisitions, or deemed
acquisitions, of Plato Common Stock or other equity securities
of Plato in connection with (i) the payment of the exercise
price of Plato Stock Options with Plato Common Stock (including
in connection with net exercises),
(ii) required tax withholding in connection with the
exercise of Plato Stock Options, vesting of Plato RSUs and Plato
PSUs and vesting, exercise or settlement of Plato DSUs and
(iii) forfeitures of Plato Stock Options, Plato RSUs, Plato
PSUs and Plato DSUs, there are no outstanding contractual
obligations of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of Plato Capital Stock or
the capital stock of any of its Subsidiaries, other than
pursuant to the Plato
A-12
Benefit Plans. There are no bonds, debentures, notes or other
indebtedness of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries having the
right to vote (or convertible into, or exchangeable for,
securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which
stockholders of Plato may vote.
(b) Plato owns, directly or indirectly, all of the issued
and outstanding shares of capital stock of each of its
Subsidiaries, free and clear of any liens, charges,
encumbrances, adverse rights or claims and security interests
whatsoever, excluding restrictions imposed by securities laws
(Liens), except, in the case of any
Subsidiary of Plato which is not material to the business of
Plato and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse Effect, and all of such
shares are duly authorized and validly issued and are fully
paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights, except as
would not have a material effect on the operation of
Platos and its Subsidiaries businesses. Neither
Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any voting
Contract with respect to the voting of any of its securities.
(c) Except as set forth on Section 3.2(c) of the Plato
Disclosure Letter, neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries
directly or indirectly owns as of the date of this Agreement 5%
or more of the capital stock, membership interests, partnership
interests, joint venture interests and other equity interests
in, or any interest convertible or exchangeable or exercisable
for 5% or more of the equity or similar interests in any Person
(other than a Plato Subsidiary).
Section 3.3 Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability; State Takeover
Statutes.
(a) Plato has full corporate power and authority to execute
and deliver this Agreement, to perform and comply with each of
its obligations under this Agreement and, subject to the receipt
of Plato Stockholder Approval, to consummate the Transactions
applicable to Plato, including the Plato Merger. The execution
and delivery by Plato of this Agreement, the performance and
compliance by Plato with each of its obligations herein and the
consummation by Plato of the Transactions applicable to Plato
have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on
the part of Plato, subject, in the case of the Plato Merger, to
receipt of the Plato Stockholder Approval. Plato has duly
executed and delivered this Agreement and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by Aristotle, Parent and
the Merger Subs of this Agreement, this Agreement constitutes
its legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it
in accordance with its terms, except as limited by Laws
affecting the enforcement of creditors rights generally,
by general equitable principles or by the discretion of any
Governmental Entity before which any Proceeding seeking
enforcement may be brought.
(b) The Board of Directors of Plato (the Plato
Board), at a meeting duly called and held, unanimously
adopted resolutions (i) approving this Agreement and the
consummation of the Plato Merger upon the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in this Agreement,
(ii) determining that the terms of the Agreement, the Plato
Merger and the other Transactions are fair to, and in the best
interests of, Plato and its stockholders, (iii) directing
that this Agreement be submitted to the stockholders of Plato
for adoption, (iv) recommending that Platos
stockholders adopt this Agreement (the Plato
Recommendation) and (v) declaring that this
Agreement is advisable. Assuming that on the date of this
Agreement neither Aristotle nor any of its
affiliates or associates is an
interested stockholder of Plato (each term, as
defined in DGCL Section 203), such resolutions are
sufficient to render inapplicable to this Agreement and the
Plato Merger the restrictions of Section 203 of the DGCL
(Section 203). No other business
combination, control share acquisition,
fair price, moratorium or other
anti-takeover Laws (collectively, Takeover
Laws) apply to this Agreement or the Plato Merger.
(c) Assuming that on the date of this Agreement neither
Aristotle nor any of its affiliates or
associates is an interested stockholder
of Plato (each term, as defined in DGCL Section 203), the
only vote of holders of any class or series of Plato Capital
Stock necessary to adopt this Agreement and to approve the Plato
Merger is the adoption of this Agreement by the holders of a
majority of the shares of Plato Common Stock outstanding and
entitled to vote thereon (the Plato Stockholder
Approval). The affirmative vote of the holders of
Plato Capital Stock is not necessary to consummate any
Transaction other than the Plato Merger.
A-13
Section 3.4 Consents
and Approvals; No Conflicts.
(a) Except for (i) the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) of the
preliminary Joint Proxy Statement, the Joint Proxy Statement and
the
Form S-4,
(ii) the filing of the Plato Certificate of Merger with the
Secretary of State pursuant to the DGCL, (iii) the Plato
Stockholder Approval, (iv) actions required by applicable
governmental bodies or agencies such as Food and Drug
Administration, Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of
Health and Human Services, CMS and state Medicaid agencies
(Medicare/Medicaid), Office of Personnel Management, state
boards of pharmacy and governmental controlled substances,
federal and state insurance and other federal and state
Governmental Entities with jurisdiction over the dispensing or
distribution of pharmaceutical products or over the provision of
health care items or services, Medicare Part D prescription
drug plans, pharmacy benefit management services, durable
medical equipment, insurance and risk sharing arrangements and
products and services and third-party administrator approvals,
in each case, to the extent applicable (the Healthcare
Regulatory Approvals), (v) filings, permits,
authorizations, consents, notice to and approvals as may be
required under, and other applicable requirements of,
(A) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), (B) the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act),
(C) notice pursuant to the rules and regulations of the New
York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), and
(D) the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the HSR
Act), and any foreign antitrust or competition Laws,
and (vi) such other consent, approval, waiver, license,
permit, franchise, authorization or Order
(Consents) of, or registration, declaration,
notice, report, submission or other filing
(Filings) with, any Governmental Entity (as
defined below), the failure of which to obtain or make has not
had and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse Effect or
materially impair the ability of Plato to perform its
obligations hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions, no Consents of, or
Filings with, any federal, state or local court, administrative
or regulatory agency or commission or other governmental
authority or instrumentality, domestic or foreign (each a
Governmental Entity) are necessary for the
consummation by Plato of the Transactions.
(b) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
Plato nor the consummation by Plato of the Transactions, nor
compliance by Plato with any of the terms or provisions hereof,
will (i) conflict with or violate any provision of the
Plato Charter or Plato By-laws or any of the similar
organizational documents of any of its Subsidiaries or
(ii) assuming that the authorizations, consents and
approvals referred to in Section 3.4(a) and the Plato
Stockholder Approval are duly obtained in accordance with the
DGCL, (x) violate any (1) Law or (2) Order, in
either case, applicable to Plato or any of its Subsidiaries or
any of their respective properties or assets, or
(y) violate, conflict with, result in the loss of any
material benefit under, constitute a default (or an event which,
with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a
default) under, result in the termination of or a right of
termination or cancellation under, accelerate the performance
required by, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of
the respective properties or assets of Plato or any of its
Subsidiaries under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions
of any note, bond, debenture, mortgage, indenture, deed of
trust, license, lease, agreement or other contract, agreement,
commitment instrument or obligation (each, including all
amendments thereto, a Contract) to which
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries is a party, or by which they or
any of their respective properties or assets may be bound or
affected, except, in the case of the foregoing clauses (x)(1)
and (y), as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Plato to perform its
obligations hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions. The foregoing
representation does not take into account, and no representation
or warranty set forth in the foregoing Section 3.4(b) is
made concerning, the effect of any Order applicable to, or
Contract (other than this Agreement) of, Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries.
Section 3.5 SEC
Documents; Financial Statements; Undisclosed Liabilities.
(a) Plato has filed or furnished all reports, schedules,
forms, statements, registration statements, prospectuses and
other documents required to be filed or furnished by Plato with
the SEC under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act since
January 1, 2009 (the Plato SEC
Documents). None of the Plato Subsidiaries or any
Plato Affiliate is required to make any filings with the SEC.
A-14
(b) As of its respective filing date, and, if amended, as
of the date of the last amendment prior to the date of this
Agreement, each Plato SEC Document (other than the Plato SEC
Financial Statements) complied in all material respects with the
requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, as the
case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
promulgated thereunder applicable to such Plato SEC Document
(other than the Plato SEC Financial Statements) and did not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(c) The consolidated financial statements of Plato included
in the Plato SEC Documents (including, in each case, any notes
or schedules thereto) and all related compilations, reviews and
other reports issued by Platos accountants with respect
thereto (the Plato SEC Financial Statements),
comply as to form in all material respects with applicable
accounting requirements and the published rules and regulations
of the SEC with respect thereto. The Plato SEC Financial
Statements fairly present, in all material respects, the
financial condition and the results of operations, cash flows
and changes in stockholders equity of Plato (on a
consolidated basis) as of the respective dates of and for the
periods referred to in the Plato SEC Financial Statements, and
were prepared in accordance with GAAP (except as otherwise noted
therein) applied on a consistent basis during the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto),
subject, in the case of interim Plato SEC Financial Statements,
to normal year-end adjustments (which are not material in
significance or amount) and the absence of notes. The books and
records of Plato and the Plato Subsidiaries are accurate and
complete, have been maintained in accordance with sound business
practices and accurately present and reflect in all material
respects all of the transactions and actions therein described
and the Plato SEC Financial Statements have been prepared, in
all material respects, in accordance with such books and
records. At the Closing, all such books and records will be in
the possession of Plato or the applicable Plato Subsidiary. No
financial statements of any Person other than Plato and the
Plato Subsidiaries are required by GAAP to be included in the
consolidated financial statements of Plato. Except as required
by GAAP, Plato has not, between December 25, 2010 and the
date of this Agreement, made or adopted any material change in
its accounting methods, practices or policies in effect on
December 25, 2010.
(d) Plato is in compliance in all material respects with
(i) the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and the related rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder or under the Exchange Act (the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and (ii) the
applicable listing and corporate governance rules and
regulations of the NYSE.
(e) Plato has made available to Aristotle true and complete
copies of all material written comment letters from the staff of
the SEC received since January 1, 2008 relating to the
Plato SEC Documents and all written responses of Plato thereto
other than with respect to requests for confidential treatment
or which are otherwise publicly available on the SECs
EDGAR system. There are no outstanding or unresolved comments in
comment letters received from the SEC staff with respect to any
Plato SEC Documents and none of the Plato SEC Documents (other
than confidential treatment requests) is the subject of ongoing
SEC review. There are no internal investigations, any SEC
inquiries or investigations or other governmental inquiries or
investigations, to the Knowledge of Plato, pending or
threatened, in each case regarding any accounting practices of
Plato.
(f) Plato has established and maintains disclosure controls
and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (as
such terms are defined in paragraphs (e) and (f),
respectively, of
Rule 13a-15
and paragraph (e) of
Rule 15d-15
under the Exchange Act) as required by
Rules 13a-15
and 15d-15
under the Exchange Act. Platos disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that all information (both
financial and non-financial) required to be disclosed by Plato
in the reports that it files or furnishes under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that
all such information is accumulated and communicated to
Platos management as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure and to make the certifications
required pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Platos management has completed an
assessment of the effectiveness of Platos disclosure
controls and procedures and, to the extent required by
applicable Law, presented in any applicable Plato SEC Document
that is a report on
Form 10-K
or
Form 10-Q,
or any amendment thereto, its conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by such report or amendment based
on such evaluation. Based on Platos
A-15
managements most recently completed evaluation of
Platos internal control over financial reporting,
(i) Plato had no significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses in the design or operation of its internal control
over financial reporting that would reasonably be expected to
adversely affect Platos ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information and (ii) Plato
does not have Knowledge of any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in Platos internal control over financial
reporting.
(g) Plato and the Plato Subsidiaries do not have any
liabilities or obligations of any nature (whether absolute or
contingent, asserted or unasserted, known or unknown, primary or
secondary, direct or indirect, and whether or not accrued),
except (i) that, individually or in the aggregate, have not
had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect, (ii) as disclosed, reflected or
reserved against in the most recent audited balance sheet
included in the Plato SEC Financial Statements or the notes
thereto, (iii) for liabilities and obligations incurred in
the ordinary course of business since the date of the most
recent audited balance sheet included in the Plato SEC Financial
Statements, and (iv) for liabilities and obligations
arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the Mergers
or the Transactions.
(h) Statutory Financial Statements of
Subsidiaries. Plato has previously delivered
or made available to Aristotle true, complete and correct copies
of the statutory financial statements of each Plato Insurance
Company Subsidiary, as filed with the applicable domestic
regulators for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010
and for each subsequent quarterly period, together with all
exhibits and schedules thereto (the Plato Subsidiary
SAP Statements). The Plato Subsidiary SAP Statements
fairly present, in all material respects, the respective
statutory financial conditions of each of the Plato Insurance
Company Subsidiaries at the respective dates thereof, and the
statutory results of operations for the periods then ended in
accordance with Applicable SAP applied on a consistent basis
throughout the periods indicated and consistent with each other,
except as otherwise specifically noted therein.
Section 3.6 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since
December 25, 2010, (a) Plato and its
Subsidiaries have conducted their businesses in all material
respects only in the ordinary course and in a manner consistent
with past practice and (b) there has not been any event
that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would
reasonably be expected to have a Plato Material Adverse Effect.
Since December 25, 2010 through the date of this Agreement,
neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken any action
that would have constituted a breach of, or required
Aristotles consent pursuant to, Section 5.1 hereof
had the covenants therein applied since December 25, 2010.
Section 3.7 Information
Supplied. None of the information supplied or
to be supplied by Plato for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in (i) the registration statement on
Form S-4
to be filed with the SEC by Parent in connection with the
Mergers (the
Form S-4)
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC, and at any time it is amended or
supplemented or at the time it becomes effective under the
Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, and
(ii) the Joint Proxy Statement will, at the date it or any
amendment or supplement is mailed to holders of the shares of
Plato Common Stock and Aristotle Common Stock and at the time of
the Plato Stockholders Meeting and at the time of the Aristotle
Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they
are made, not misleading (except that no representation or
warranty is made by Plato to such portions thereof that relate
expressly to Aristotle, Parent, the Merger Subs or any of their
Subsidiaries or to statements made therein based on information
supplied by or on behalf of Aristotle, Parent or Merger Subs for
inclusion or incorporation by reference therein). The Joint
Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material respects
with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
Section 3.8 Legal
Proceedings. There are no Proceedings
pending, or to the Knowledge of Plato, threatened against Plato
or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective assets,
rights or properties or any of the officers or directors of
Plato, except, in each case, for those that, individually or in
the aggregate, have not had, and would not reasonably be
expected to have, a Plato Material Adverse Effect. Neither Plato
nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of their respective
properties, rights or assets is or are subject to any Order,
except
A-16
for those that, individually or in the aggregate, have not had,
and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Plato Material
Adverse Effect.
Section 3.9 Compliance
with Laws.
(a) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect, (i) Plato and its Subsidiaries are in compliance
and since January 1, 2008 have been in compliance with all
Laws and Orders applicable to Plato, any Plato Subsidiary or any
assets owned or used by any of them, and (ii) neither Plato
nor any Plato Subsidiary has received any written communication
during the past two (2) years from a Governmental Entity
that alleges that Plato or a Plato Subsidiary is not in
compliance with any Law.
(b) Plato and its Subsidiaries (i) are in compliance
and since January 1, 2008 have been in compliance in all
material respects with the United States Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act of 1977 (the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act) and any other United States and foreign Laws
concerning corrupting payments; (ii) since January 1,
2008, have not been investigated by any Governmental Entity with
respect to, or been given notice by a Governmental Entity of,
any violation by Plato of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or
any other United States or foreign Laws concerning
corrupting payments; and (iii) since January 1, 2008,
have an operational and effective Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act/anti-corruption compliance program that includes, at a
minimum, policies, procedures and training intended to enhance
awareness of and compliance by Plato or such Plato Subsidiary
with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and any other applicable
United States or foreign Laws concerning corrupting payments.
(c) Plato and its Subsidiaries have in effect privacy
compliance and data security programs that include assigned
staff, policies, procedures and training to enhance awareness of
and compliance by Plato and the Plato Subsidiaries with relevant
United States and applicable foreign Laws concerning privacy and
data security.
Section 3.10 Regulatory
Compliance. Plato and each of its
Subsidiaries have all required governmental licenses, permits,
certificates, approvals, billing and authorizations
(Permits) necessary for the conduct of their
business and the use of their properties and assets, as
presently conducted and used and each of the Permits is valid,
subsisting and in full force and effect, except where the
failure to have or maintain such Permit would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Plato to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions.
The operation of the business of Plato and its Subsidiaries as
currently conducted is not, and has not been since
January 1, 2008, in violation of, nor is Plato or its
Subsidiaries in default or violation under, any Permit, and, to
the Knowledge of Plato, no event has occurred which, with notice
or the lapse of time or both, would constitute a default or
violation of any material terms, condition or provision of any
Permit, except where such default or violation of such Permit
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse Effect. There are no actions
pending or, to the Knowledge of Plato, threatened, that seek the
revocation, cancellation or adverse modification of any Permit,
except where such revocation, cancellation or adverse
modification would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Plato to perform its
obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions. Since January 1,
2008, neither Plato nor its Subsidiaries have received or been
subject to any written notice, charge, claim or assertion, or,
to the Knowledge of Plato, any other notice, charge, claim or
assertion, in each case alleging any violations of Permits, nor
to the Knowledge of Plato, has any such notice, charge, claim or
assertion been threatened, except where the receipt of such
notice, charge, claim or assertion would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Plato to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions.
(a) Plato and each of its Subsidiaries are in compliance
with, to the extent applicable, (i) all rules and
regulations of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, including any
guidance interpreting such rules and regulations, the Federal
Employee Health Benefit Program, and any other federal health
care program; (ii) all federal laws, rules, regulations and
applicable guidance relating to health care fraud and abuse,
including,
A-17
without limitation: (A) the Anti-Kickback Law,
42 U.S.C. §
1320a-7b,
42 C.F.R. § 1001.952, (B) the federal false
coding statute, 42 U.S.C. §
1320a-7a,
(C) the federal physician self-referral prohibition,
42 U.S.C. § 1395nn, 42 C.F.R. § 411.351
et seq., and (D) the false claims act, 31 U.S.C.
§ 3729 et seq.; (iii) any and all state laws relating
to health care fraud and abuse; (iv) state laws relating to
Medicaid or any other state health care or health insurance
programs; (v) federal or state laws related to billing or
claims for reimbursement submitted to any third party payor;
(vi) any other federal or state laws relating to
fraudulent, abusive or unlawful practices connected with the
provision of health care items or services provided to a
beneficiary of any state, federal or other governmental health
care or health insurance program or any private payor; and
(vii) any and all federal and state laws relating to
insurance, third party administrator, utilization review and
risk sharing products, services and arrangements and the like
(collectively, (i) (vii), Health Care
Laws), except where any failure to be in compliance
with any of the Health Care Laws would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Plato to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions. No
third-party payment program has imposed a fine, penalty or other
sanction on Plato or its Subsidiaries and none of Plato or its
Subsidiaries has been excluded or suspended from participation
in any such program, except as would not reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Since January 1, 2008, (i) neither Plato nor
any of its Subsidiaries has received or been subject to any
written notice, charge, claim or assertion alleging any
violation of the Health Care Laws, and to the Knowledge of
Plato, no action alleging any violation of any Health Care Law
by Plato or its Subsidiaries is currently threatened against
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries, except where such notice,
charge, claim, assertion or action would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Plato to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions and
(ii) neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries has settled,
or agreed to settle, any actions brought by any Governmental
Entity for a violation of Health Care Laws, except where such
settlement or action would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Plato to perform its
obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions.
(c) To the Knowledge of Plato, since January 1, 2008,
neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor any director or
executive officer of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries, with
respect to actions taken on behalf of Plato or its Subsidiaries,
(i) has been assessed a civil money penalty under
Section 1128A of the Social Security Act or any regulations
promulgated thereunder, (ii) has been excluded from
participation in any federal health care program or state health
care program (as such terms are defined by the Social Security
Act), (iii) has been convicted of any criminal offense
relating to the delivery of any item or service under a federal
health care program relating to the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, prescription, or dispensing of a prescription drug
or a controlled substance, (iv) has been disbarred or
disqualified from participation in regulated activities for any
violation or alleged violation of any Health Care Laws,
(v) has been listed on the General Services Administration
List of Parties Excluded from Federal Programs or (vi) is a
party to or subject to any Proceeding concerning any of the
matters described above in clauses (i) through (iii).
(d) Plato and each of its Subsidiaries are in compliance
with all applicable Laws with respect to matters relating to
patient or individual health care or personal information,
including, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104 191, as amended, and any rules
or regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the
Healthcare Information Laws), except
for failures to comply with any of the foregoing that would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse Effect.
(e) Plato and each of its Subsidiaries (i) are in
compliance with all Laws and any other applicable guidance
relating to the operation of pharmacies, the repackaging of drug
products, the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs or
controlled substances, and the dispensing of prescription drugs
or controlled substances, (ii) are in compliance with all
Laws and any other applicable guidance relating to the labeling,
packaging, advertising, or adulteration of prescription drugs or
controlled substances and (iii) are not subject to any
sanction or other adverse action by any Governmental Entity for
the matters described above in
A-18
clauses (i) and (ii), except for such failures to comply or
such sanctions described in clauses (i) through
(iii) that would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Plato to perform its
obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions.
(f) Each Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary has filed with
the appropriate Governmental Entities, including state health
and insurance regulatory authorities and any applicable federal
regulatory authorities, all material reports, statements,
documents, registrations, filings or submissions required to be
filed by them. As of its respective filing date, and, if
amended, as of the date of the last amendment prior to the date
of this Agreement, each such registration, filing and submission
complied in all material respects with applicable Law, and no
material deficiencies have been asserted by any Governmental
Entity with respect to such registrations, filings or
submissions that have not been cured.
(g) All policy forms and certificates used by Plato and any
of its Subsidiaries, the forms of all policies and certificates
on which Plato Subsidiary Insurance Agreements were written and
all amendments, endorsements and riders thereto, and all
applications, brochures and marketing materials pertaining
thereto have been approved by all applicable Governmental
Entities or filed with and not objected to by such Governmental
Entities within the period provided by applicable Law for
objection, to the extent required by Law, and comply with all
requirements of Law, except where the failure to obtain such
approval or the failure to comply would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect. Plato and each of its Plato Insurance
Company Subsidiaries have, separately and in the aggregate,
performed their obligations with respect to the Plato Subsidiary
Insurance Agreements, as applicable, in accordance with the
terms of the Plato Subsidiary Insurance Agreements in all
material respects.
(h) All premium rates, rating plans and policy terms
established or used by Plato or any Plato Insurance Company
Subsidiary that are required to be filed with
and/or
approved by Governmental Entities have been so filed
and/or
approved in all material respects and the premiums charged
conform in all material respects to the premiums so filed
and/or
approved and comply in all material respects with the insurance
Laws applicable thereto.
(i) Insurance Laws. Except as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse Effect, (i) each Plato
Insurance Company Subsidiary (including the business, marketing,
operations, sales and issuances of Plato Subsidiary Insurance
Agreements conducted by or through agents or otherwise) is, and
since January 1, 2008 has been, in compliance with
applicable Laws and (ii) no Plato Insurance Company
Subsidiary has received any written communication during the
past two (2) years from a Governmental Entity that alleges
that a Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary is not in compliance
with any Law. There is no pending or, to the Knowledge of Plato,
threatened charge by any state insurance regulatory authority
that any Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary has allegedly
violated, nor is there any pending or, to the Knowledge of
Plato, threatened investigation or enforcement proceeding by any
state insurance regulatory authority with respect to possible
violations by any Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary of, any
applicable insurance Laws, except where such charge,
investigation or enforcement proceeding would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Plato to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions.
Each Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary has been duly authorized
by the relevant state insurance regulatory authorities to issue
the policies
and/or
contracts of insurance that it is currently writing and in the
states in which it conducts its business, except where the
failure to be so duly authorized would not reasonably be
expected to have a Plato Material Adverse Effect or materially
impair the ability of Plato to perform its obligation hereunder
or prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the
Transactions. None of the Plato Insurance Company Subsidiaries
is subject to any Order or decree of any insurance regulatory
authority which (i) would, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Plato Material
Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of Plato to
perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay
the consummation of any of the Transactions, (ii) relates
to material marketing, sales, trade or underwriting practices
(other than routine correspondence) from and after
January 1, 2008 or (iii) seeks the revocation or
suspension of any material Permit issued pursuant to applicable
insurance Law.
A-19
Section 3.11 Absence
of Changes in Benefit Plans. Except as set
forth on Schedule 3.11 of the Plato Disclosure Letter, from
December 25, 2010 to the date of this Agreement, there has
not occurred other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as specifically set forth in
Platos most recent Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed with the SEC any (a) increase in the compensation
(including bonus opportunities) of any of its directors or
executive officers, (b) grant of any severance or
termination pay to any of its executive officers, (c) grant
of equity awards to any director or executive officer,
(d) entry into or amendment of any employment, consulting,
change in control, retention or severance agreement or
arrangement with any executive officers or
(e) establishment, adoption, entry into, freeze or
amendment in any respect or termination of any Plato Benefit
Plan or any action to accelerate entitlement to material
compensation or benefits under any Plato Benefit Plan or
otherwise for, in each case, the benefit of any director or
executive officer. As used in this Agreement,
Plato Benefit Plan means any employee
benefit plan including any employee benefit plan, as
defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) and
each stock grant, stock purchase, stock option, severance,
employment,
change-in-control,
fringe benefit, loan, bonus, incentive, sabbatical, medical,
dental, vision, disability, cafeteria benefit, dependent care,
welfare benefit, life insurance or accident insurance,
retirement, supplemental retirement, deferred compensation or
other compensation or benefit plan, agreement, program, policy
or other arrangement, whether or not subject to ERISA,
maintained, entered into or contributed to by Plato or any of
its ERISA Affiliates, or to which Plato or any of its ERISA
Affiliates is a party, whether written or oral, for the benefit
of any present or former employee, consultant or director of
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries (including their dependents or
beneficiaries) or with respect to which Plato or any of its
ERISA Affiliates has any liability (contingent or otherwise) ),
other than any schemes or arrangements mandated by a government
outside of the United States.
Section 3.12 ERISA
Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments.
(a) Schedule 3.12(a) of the Plato Disclosure Letter
sets forth a true, correct and complete list of each material
Plato Benefit Plan (as defined herein). Plato has made available
to Aristotle true, complete and correct copies of (i) each
material Plato Benefit Plan and all material amendments thereto
(or, in the case of any material unwritten Plato Benefit Plan, a
description thereof), (ii) with respect to each material
Plato Benefit Plan, to the extent applicable, for the two
(2) most recent plan years (A) the annual report on
Form 5500 and attached schedules and, if applicable
(B) actuarial valuation reports, (iii) the most recent
summary plan description for each material Plato Benefit Plan
(or other written explanation provided to employees in the case
of a material Plato Benefit Plan for which such summary plan
description is not required) and (iv) each trust agreement
and group annuity contract relating to any material Plato
Benefit Plan.
(b) No material liability under Title IV of ERISA has
been incurred by Plato or any of its ERISA Affiliates which has
not been satisfied in full and no event has occurred and, to the
Knowledge of Plato, no condition exists that could reasonably be
likely to result in Plato or any of its ERISA Affiliates
incurring a material liability under Title IV of ERISA. No
Plato Benefit Plan is a defined benefit pension plan or is
subject to Section 302 or Title IV of ERISA or
Section 412 of the Code. No Plato Benefit Plan is a
multiemployer plan within the meaning of Section 3(37) of
ERISA or a multiple employer welfare arrangement as defined in
Section 3(40) or ERISA.
(c) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect, each Plato Benefit Plan that is intended to be qualified
under Section 401(a) of the Code is so qualified and the
plan as currently in effect has received a favorable
determination or opinion letter to that effect from the Internal
Revenue Service and Plato is not aware of any reason why any
such determination letter should be revoked or not be reissued.
Plato has made available to Aristotle copies of the most recent
Internal Revenue Service determination or opinion letters with
respect to each such material Plato Benefit Plan. Each Plato
Benefit Plan has been maintained in compliance with its terms
and with the requirements prescribed by any and all statutes,
orders, rules and regulations, including ERISA and the Code,
which are applicable to such Plato Benefit Plan with such
exceptions as would not be reasonably expected, individually or
in the aggregate, to have a Plato Material Adverse Effect. There
are no pending or, to the Knowledge of Plato, threatened
Proceedings against any Plato Benefit Plan, any fiduciary
thereof, Plato or any Subsidiary that could reasonably be,
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect.
A-20
To the Knowledge of Plato, none of Plato, any of its
Subsidiaries, any officer of Plato or of any Subsidiary or any
of the Plato Benefit Plans which are subject to ERISA, including
the Plato Benefit Plans, any trusts created thereunder or any
trustee or administrator thereof, has engaged in a
prohibited transaction (as such term is defined in
Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code) or
any other breach of fiduciary responsibility that could subject
Plato, any Subsidiary or any officer of Plato or of any
Subsidiary to any tax or penalty on prohibited transactions
imposed by such Section 4975 of the Code or to any material
liability under Section 502(i) or 502(1) of ERISA.
(d) Except in connection with any Non-US Plato Benefit Plan
(as defined below), there is no material current or projected
liability in respect of post-employment or post-retirement
health or medical or life insurance benefits for retired, former
or current employees of Plato or its Subsidiaries, except as
required to avoid excise tax under Section 4980B of the
Code.
(e) With respect to Plato Benefit Plans that are subject to
or governed by the Laws of any jurisdiction other than the
United States (the Non-US Plato Benefit
Plans), except as would not reasonably be, expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect, (i) all amounts required to be reserved under each
book reserved Non-US Plato Benefit Plan have been so reserved in
accordance with GAAP and (ii) each Non-US Plato Benefit
Plan required to be registered with a Governmental Entity has
been registered, has been maintained in good standing with the
appropriate Governmental Entities, has been maintained and
operated in all respects in accordance with its terms and is in
compliance with all applicable Laws.
(f) Except as otherwise contemplated under this Agreement
or except pursuant to the terms of the Plato Benefit Plans which
are publicly filed with the SEC as of the date of this
Agreement, neither the execution nor delivery of this Agreement
nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
shall, whether alone or in combination with any other event,
result in (i) the accelerated vesting or payment of, or any
(x) increase in (for any executive officer or director), or
(y) material increase in (for any non-executive officer
employee), any compensation to any present or former executive
officer, director or non-executive officer employee,
respectively, of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries or
(ii) the entitlement of any present or former executive
officer or director of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries to
severance or termination pay or benefits, or of any present or
former non-executive officer employee of Plato or any of its
Subsidiaries to material severance or termination pay or
benefits. Schedule 3.12(f) of the Plato Disclosure Letter
sets forth a list of each of the participants in the Plato 2006
Executive Change in Control Severance Plan and the Plato 2006
Executive Severance Plan.
(g) Plato has delivered to Aristotle a report, prepared by
an outside accounting firm based on information provided to such
accounting firm by Plato, that sets forth certain amounts
payable to the then current executive officers of Plato in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
No Plato Benefit Plan provides for the
gross-up of
any Taxes payable by any individual.
Section 3.13 Employee
and Labor Matters.
(a) Except as listed in Section 3.13(a) of the Plato
Disclosure Letter, (A) neither Plato nor any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any collective bargaining
agreement, agreement with any works council, or labor contract,
(B) no labor union, labor organization, works council, or
group of employees of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries has made
a pending demand for recognition or certification, and
(C) there are no representation or certification
proceedings or petitions seeking a representation proceeding
presently pending or threatened in writing to be brought or
filed with the National Labor Relations Board or any other labor
relations tribunal or authority. Neither Plato nor any
Subsidiary has engaged in any unfair labor practice with respect
to any individuals employed by or otherwise performing services
for Plato or any of its Subsidiaries (the Plato
Business Personnel), and there is no unfair labor
practice complaint or grievance or other administrative or
judicial complaint, action or investigation pending or, to the
Knowledge of Plato, threatened in writing against Plato or any
of its Subsidiaries by the National Labor Relations Board or any
other Governmental Entity with respect to the Plato Business
Personnel. There is no labor strike, dispute, lockout, slowdown
or stoppage pending or, to the Knowledge of Plato, threatened
against or affecting Plato or any
A-21
Subsidiary which is reasonably likely to materially interfere
with the respective business activities of Plato or any
Subsidiary.
(b) Neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries are required
to provide notice to any work council or similar representative
body prior to the execution of this Agreement.
(c) Plato and its Subsidiaries are and have been in
compliance with all collective bargaining agreements, agreements
with any works council, or labor contracts to or by which Plato
or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or bound and with all
applicable Laws respecting employment and employment practices,
including, without limitation, all Laws respecting terms and
conditions of employment, health and safety, wages and hours,
child labor, immigration, employment discrimination, disability
rights or benefits, equal opportunity, plant closures and
layoffs, affirmative action, workers compensation, labor
relations and unemployment insurance, except for noncompliance
as would not reasonably be, expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse Effect.
(d) To the Knowledge of Plato, no employee of Plato or any
of its Subsidiaries at the level of Senior Vice President or
higher is in any respect in violation of any term of any
employment agreement, nondisclosure agreement, common law
nondisclosure obligation, fiduciary duty, noncompetition
agreement, restrictive covenant or other obligation to a former
employer of any such employee relating (A) to the right of
any such employee to be employed by Plato or its Subsidiaries or
(B) to the knowledge or use of trade secrets or proprietary
information, except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect.
Section 3.14 Environmental
Matters.
(a) Since January 1, 2008, Plato and each of its
Subsidiaries has been in material compliance with all
Environmental Laws, which compliance includes, but is not
limited to, the possession of all material Permits and other
material governmental authorizations required under all
Environmental Laws, and compliance with the terms and conditions
thereof. Since January 1, 2008, neither Plato or any of its
Subsidiaries have received any communication (written or oral),
that alleges Plato or its Subsidiaries is not in such material
compliance. All material Permits and other material governmental
authorizations currently held by Plato and its Subsidiaries
pursuant to all Environmental Laws are identified in
Section 3.14(a) of the Plato Disclosure Letter.
(b) There is no Environmental Claim pending or, to the
Knowledge of Plato, threatened against Plato or its
Subsidiaries, or to the Knowledge of Plato against any person or
entity whose liability for any Environmental Claim Plato has
retained or assumed either contractually or by operation of law.
(c) To the Knowledge of Plato, there are no conditions or
incidents, including, without limitation, the Release of any
Material of Environmental Concern, that could reasonably be
expected to result in any material Environmental Claim against
Plato or its Subsidiaries, or against any person or entity whose
liability for any Environmental Claim Plato has retained or
assumed either contractually or by operation of law, or
otherwise result in any material costs or liabilities to Plato
or its Subsidiaries under Environmental Law.
(d) Without in any way limiting the generality of the
foregoing, to the Knowledge of Plato, and except as in material
compliance with Environmental Laws, none of the real property
owned by Plato or its Subsidiaries or to the Knowledge of Plato,
any leased property, contains any underground storage tanks;
asbestos; toxic molds, deed restrictions or other engineering
controls due to environmental conditions, polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs); underground injection wells; or waste
management units, radioactive materials; or septic tanks or
waste disposal pits or lagoons in which process wastewater or
any Materials of Environmental Concern have been discharged or
disposed;
(e) Neither Plato nor its Subsidiaries, is required by any
Environmental Law or by virtue of the transactions set forth
herein and contemplated hereby, or as a condition to the
effectiveness of any transactions contemplated hereby,
(i) to perform a site assessment for Materials of
Environmental Concern, (ii) to remove or remediate
Materials of Environmental Concern, (iii) to give notice to
or receive approval from any governmental authority including
pursuant to the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act
(N.J.S.A. 13:1K-6
A-22
et seq.), or (iv) to record or deliver to any person or
entity any disclosure document or statement pertaining to
environmental matters.
(f) Plato and its Subsidiaries have provided to Aristotle
all material environmental site assessments, reports, results of
investigations and audits in the possession, custody, or control
of Plato pertaining to (A) environmental condition of the
real properties and operations of Plato and its Subsidiaries,
and (B) compliance (or noncompliance) by Plato with any
Environmental Laws.
(g) Notwithstanding any other representation or warranty in
this Article III, the representations and warranties in
this Section 3.14 together with the representations and
warranties in Sections 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6, constitute the
sole representations and warranties relating to any
Environmental Law, Environmental Claim or Release of any
Material of Environmental Concern.
Section 3.15 Properties. Except
for those matters that, individually or in the aggregate, have
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a Plato
Material Adverse Effect: (A) Plato and each of its
Subsidiaries has good, valid and marketable title to, or valid
leasehold or sublease interests or other comparable contract
rights in or relating to all real property of Plato and its
Subsidiaries free and clear of all Liens, except for Permitted
Liens and minor defects in title, recorded easements,
restrictive covenants and similar encumbrances of record;
(B) Plato and each of its Subsidiaries has complied with
the terms of all leases of real property of Plato and its
Subsidiaries and all such leases are in full force and effect,
enforceable in accordance with their terms against Plato or any
Subsidiary party thereto and, to the Knowledge of Plato, the
counterparties thereto; and (C) neither Plato nor any of
its Subsidiaries has received or provided any written notice of
any event or occurrence that has resulted or would reasonably be
expected to result (with or without the giving of notice, the
lapse of time or both) in a default with respect to any such
lease.
Section 3.16 Tax
Returns and Tax Payments. Except as disclosed
in Section 3.16 of the Plato Disclosure Letter,
(a) Plato and its Subsidiaries have timely filed (or, as to
Subsidiaries, Plato has filed on behalf of such Subsidiaries)
all Tax Returns required to be filed by it, other than Tax
Returns the failure of which to file would not reasonably be
expected to have a Plato Material Adverse Effect, and all such
Tax Returns are true, correct and complete in all material
respects;
(b) Plato and its Subsidiaries have paid (or, as to
Subsidiaries, Plato has paid on behalf of such Subsidiaries) all
Taxes (as defined below) shown to be due on such Tax Returns or
has provided (or, as to Subsidiaries, Plato has made provision
on behalf of such Subsidiaries) reserves in its financial
statements for any Taxes that have not been paid, whether or not
shown as being due on any Tax Returns;
(c) Neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries has granted
any request that remains in effect for waivers of the time to
assess any Taxes of any material amount;
(d) No claim for unpaid Taxes has been asserted against
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries in writing by a Tax authority,
which, if resolved in a manner unfavorable to Plato or any of
its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, would reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect;
(e) There are no Liens for Taxes upon the assets of Plato
or any Subsidiary, except for Permitted Liens;
(f) No audit of any material Tax Return of Plato or any of
its Subsidiaries is being conducted by a Tax authority;
(g) Neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
material liability for Taxes of any Person (other than Plato and
its Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any comparable provision of state, local or foreign law);
(h) None of Plato or its Subsidiaries has been a party to
any listed transaction within the meaning of
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(2);
A-23
(i) In the last five (5) years, none of Plato or its
Subsidiaries has distributed stock of another person or has had
its stock distributed by another person, in a transaction that
was purported or intended to be governed in whole or in part by
Section 355 of the Code; and
(j) Neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken or
agreed to take any action that would prevent the Plato Merger
and the Aristotle Merger, taken together, from qualifying as an
exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of
the Code.
Section 3.17 Material
Contracts.
(a) All Contracts required to be filed as exhibits to the
Plato SEC Documents have been so filed in a timely manner.
Section 3.17(a) of the Plato Disclosure Letter sets forth a
true and complete list, as of the date hereof, of each of the
following contracts (other than Plato Benefit Plans) to which
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which Plato or
any of its Subsidiaries or any of their assets or businesses are
bound (and any amendments, supplements and modifications
thereto):
(1) any Contract that is a material contract
(as such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the Exchange Act other than any such Contract that is not
required to be filed under clause (iii)(C) thereof);
(2) any Contract that materially limits the ability of
Plato or Plato and its any Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to
compete or provide services in any line of business or with any
Person or in any geographic area or market segment or to engage
in any type of business (including any license, collaboration,
agency or distribution agreements);
(3) any Contract required to be disclosed pursuant to
Item 404 of
Regulation S-K
of the Exchange Act;
(4) any Contract or series of related Contracts relating to
indebtedness for borrowed money (i) in excess of
$100 million or (ii) that becomes due and payable as a
result of the Transactions;
(5) any material license, sublicense, option or other
Contract relating to Plato Material Intellectual Property;
(6) any Contract that provides for any standstill, most
favored nation provision or equivalent preferential pricing
terms, exclusivity or similar obligations to which Plato or any
Plato Subsidiary is subject which is material to Plato and its
Subsidiaries taken as a whole;
(7) any Contract with the Platos top 10 suppliers
(including purchasing agreements, group purchasing agreements,
and excluding any Contract described by clauses (8) and
(9) below and excluding work orders, statements of work,
purchase orders and similar contracts) ) (measured by dollar
volume of purchases of Plato during the twelve (12) months
ended June 30, 2011);
(8) the top 20 customer Contracts of Plato (measured by
dollar volume of drug spend by the customer during the twelve
(12) months ended June 30, 2011);
(9) the top 10 Contracts with network pharmacy providers
and PSAOs (measured by dollar volume of amounts paid by Plato to
provider or PSAO or PSAO affiliated provider during the time
period beginning July 10, 2010 and ending July 8,
2011);
(10) any Contract with any of Platos top 10
pharmaceutical manufacturers concerning rebate and
administrative fee arrangements and purchase discounts (measured
by rebate/administrative fee and purchase discount revenue
received by Plato during the twelve (12) months ended
June 30, 2011);
(11) any Contract with any of Platos top 10
pharmaceutical manufacturers relating to specialty
pharmaceutical products (measured by dollar volume of purchases
of Plato, combined with any applicable service fees paid to
Plato thereunder during the twelve (12) months ended
June 30, 2011);
(12) any purchase, sale or supply contract that contains
volume requirements or commitments, exclusive or preferred
purchasing arrangements or promotional requirements;
A-24
(13) any Contract for any joint venture, partnership or
similar arrangement, or any contract involving a sharing of
revenues, profits, losses, costs, or liabilities by Plato or any
Subsidiary with any other Person involving a potential combined
commitment or payment by Plato and any Subsidiary in excess of
$50 million annually.
(b) Plato has heretofore made available to Aristotle, or
pursuant to customary clean-room arrangements,
Aristotles applicable non-employee Representatives, true,
correct and complete copies of the following Material Contracts
other than for the redaction of commercially sensitive
information in, including of the identity of counterparties:
(1) 5 of the top 10 Contracts with Platos customers
(measured by dollar volume of drug spend by the customer during
the twelve (12) months ended June 30, 2011);
(2) 5 of the top 10 Contracts with Platos network
pharmacy providers and PSAOs (measured by dollar volume of
amounts paid by Plato to provider or PSAO and PSAO affiliated
providers during the twelve (12) months ended June 30,
2011);
(3) Contracts relating to 5 of the top 10 non-specialty
pharmaceutical products with Platos pharmaceutical
non-specialty manufacturers (measured by Total Average Wholesale
Price received by Plato during the quarter ended
March 26, 2011);
(4) Excerpts of the most favored nation provisions or
non-compete provisions or similar obligations with Platos
customers to which Plato or any Plato Subsidiary is subject
which are material to Plato or Plato and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole; and
(5) Contracts relating to 5 of the top 10 specialty
pharmaceutical products with Platos pharmaceutical
manufacturers concerning rebate and administrative fee
arrangements and purchase discounts (measured by Total Average
Wholesale Price received by Plato during the quarter ended
March 26, 2011).
(c) All Contracts set forth or required to be set forth in
Section 3.17(a) and 3.17(b) of the Plato Disclosure Letter
or filed or required to be filed as exhibits to the Plato SEC
Documents (the Material Contracts) are valid,
binding and in full force and effect and are enforceable by
Plato or the applicable Subsidiary in accordance with their
terms, except as limited by Laws affecting the enforcement of
creditors rights generally, by general equitable
principles or by the discretion of any Governmental Entity
before which any Proceeding seeking enforcement may be brought
and except for such failures to be valid, binding and in full
force and effect or enforceable that would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Plato
Material Adverse Effect. Plato, or the applicable Subsidiary,
has performed all obligations required to be performed by it
under the Material Contracts, and it is not (with or without
notice or lapse of time, or both) in breach or default in any
material respect thereunder and, to the Knowledge of Plato, no
other party to any contract is (with or without notice or lapse
of time, or both) in breach or default in any material respect
thereunder. Since December 25, 2010, neither Plato
nor any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice of any
actual, alleged, possible or potential violation of, or failure
to comply with, any material term or requirement of any Material
Contract. Neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries has received
any written notice of the intention of any party to cancel,
terminate, materially change the scope of rights under or fail
to renew any Material Contract.
Section 3.18 Intellectual
Property.
(a) Section 3.18(a) of the Plato Disclosure Letter
sets forth a true and complete list of all Plato Material
Intellectual Property currently registered or subject to a
pending application for registration in the name of Plato or any
of its Subsidiaries. To the Knowledge of Plato, Plato or one of
its Subsidiaries is the owner of such Plato Material
Intellectual Property.
(b) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Plato Material Adverse
Effect (A) to the Knowledge of Plato, Plato and its
Subsidiaries own, license or have the right to use all
Intellectual Property used in the operation of their businesses
as currently conducted, free and clear of all Liens other than
Permitted Liens; (B) no Proceedings or Orders are pending
or, to the Knowledge of Plato,
A-25
have been threatened in writing (including cease and desist
letters or requests for a license) since January 1, 2009
against Plato or its Subsidiaries (1) alleging
infringement, misappropriation or other violation of any
Intellectual Property owned by any other Person or
(2) contesting the validity of any Plato Material
Intellectual Property owned by Plato or any of its Subsidiaries;
(C) to the Knowledge of Plato, the operation of Plato and
its Subsidiaries businesses as currently conducted does
not infringe, misappropriate, or otherwise violate the
Intellectual Property of any other Person and, to the Knowledge
of Plato, no Person is infringing, misappropriating, or
otherwise violating any Plato Material Intellectual Property
owned by Plato or any of its Subsidiaries; (D) all
registrations and applications for registered Plato Material
Intellectual Property owned by Plato or any of its Subsidiaries
are subsisting and unexpired, have not been abandoned or
canceled and to the Knowledge of Plato, are valid and
enforceable; (E) Plato and its Subsidiaries take
commercially reasonable actions to protect the confidentiality
of the Plato Material Intellectual Property consisting of trade
secrets and other proprietary confidential information; and
(F) Plato and its Subsidiaries take commercially reasonable
actions to maintain and protect the integrity, security and
operation (security) of their software,
networks, databases, systems and websites
(systems) (and all information transmitted
thereby or stored therein), and since January 1, 2009 there
have been no violations of such security nor other unauthorized
access to information transmitted by such systems as to which
Plato or any of its Subsidiaries was required by applicable Law
or their respective privacy policies to notify any other Person.
Section 3.19 Insurance. All
material insurance policies (Policies) with
respect to the business and assets of Plato and its Subsidiaries
are in full force and effect. Neither Plato nor any of its
Subsidiaries is in material breach or default, and neither Plato
nor any of its Subsidiaries have taken any action or failed to
take any action which, with notice or the lapse of time, would
constitute such a breach or default, or permit termination or
modification of any of the Policies. With respect to each of the
legal proceedings set forth in the Plato SEC Documents, no such
insurer has informed Plato or any of its Subsidiaries of any
denial of coverage. Plato and its Subsidiaries have not received
any written notice of cancellation of any of the Policies. All
appropriate insurers under the Policies have been timely
notified of all potentially insurable material losses known to
Plato and pending litigation, and all appropriate actions have
been taken to timely file all claims in respect of such
insurable matters.
Section 3.20 Brokers
Fees. Except for the financial advisors
fees set forth in Section 3.20 of the Plato Disclosure
Letter, neither Plato nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of
their respective officers or directors on behalf of Plato or
such Subsidiaries has employed any financial advisor, broker or
finder or incurred any liability for any financial advisory fee,
brokers fees, commissions or finders fees in
connection with any of the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 3.21 Opinions
of Financial Advisors. The Plato financial
advisors have delivered to the Plato Board their opinions in
writing or orally, in which case, such opinions will be
subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of the
date thereof based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth therein, the Plato Merger Consideration to
be received by the holders of the shares of Plato Common Stock
pursuant to the Agreement is fair to such holders from a
financial point of view.
Section 3.22 Certain
Additional Representations. Plato has
consulted Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, counsel to Plato,
and believes that it will be able to give representations
reasonably necessary for tax counsel to Aristotle and tax
counsel to Plato to be able to render the opinions referred to
in Sections 6.2(c) and 6.3(c).
Section 3.23 No
Other Representations or Warranties. Except
for the representations and warranties expressly contained in
this Article III, neither Plato nor any of its Affiliates
nor any Person acting on any of their behalf makes any other
express or any implied representations or warranties with
respect to (i) Plato or any of its Subsidiaries, any of
their businesses, operations, assets, liabilities, condition
(financial or otherwise) or prospects or any other matter
relating to Plato or its Subsidiaries or (ii) the accuracy
or completeness of any documentation, forecasts or other
information provided by Plato, any Affiliate of Plato or any
Person acting on any of their behalf to Aristotle or Parent, any
Affiliate of Aristotle or any Person acting on any of their
behalf.
A-26
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF
ARISTOTLE,
PARENT, AND THE MERGER SUBS
Except as disclosed in (a) the disclosure letter delivered
by the Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs to Plato (the
Aristotle Disclosure Letter) prior to the
execution of this Agreement (with specific reference to the
section of this Agreement to which the information stated in
such disclosure relates; provided that
(i) disclosure in any section of such Aristotle Disclosure
Letter shall be deemed to be disclosed with respect to any other
section of this Agreement only to the extent that it is
reasonably apparent on the face of the Aristotle Disclosure
Letter that such disclosure is applicable to such other section
notwithstanding the omission of a reference or cross-reference
thereto and (ii) the mere inclusion of an item in such
Aristotle Disclosure Letter as an exception to a representation
or warranty shall not be deemed an admission that such item
represents a material exception or material fact, event or
circumstance or that such item has had, would have or would
reasonably be expected to have Material Adverse Effect on
Aristotle and its Subsidiaries (an Aristotle Material
Adverse Effect)) or (b) the Aristotle SEC
Documents filed with the SEC after January 1, 2011 and
prior to July 15, 2011, the relevance of such disclosure
being reasonably apparent on its face, but excluding
(x) any disclosure contained in any such Aristotle SEC
Documents under the heading Risk Factors or
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
or similar heading and any other disclosures contained or
referenced therein of information, factors or risks that are
predictive, cautionary or forward looking, (y) Aristotle
SEC Financial Statements (other than the notes thereto) and
(z) all exhibits and schedules thereto and documents
incorporated by reference therein; provided,
however, that the disclosures in the Aristotle SEC
Documents shall not be deemed to qualify any representation or
warranties made in Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6,
4.7, 4.21 and 4.22, Aristotle, Parent, and the Merger Subs
jointly and severally represent and warrant to Plato as follows:
Section 4.1 Corporate
Organization. Aristotle is a corporation,
Parent is a corporation and each Merger Sub is a corporation,
and each is duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has the
requisite corporate power and authority to own or lease all of
its properties and assets and to carry on its business as it is
now being conducted. Each of Aristotle, Parent and each Merger
Sub is duly licensed or qualified to do business in each
jurisdiction in which the nature of the business conducted by it
or the character or location of the properties and assets owned
or leased by it makes such licensing or qualification necessary,
except where the failure to be so licensed or qualified is not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably likely to have an
Aristotle Material Adverse Effect. The copies of the Certificate
of Incorporation and By-laws of Aristotle, as most recently
filed with the Aristotle SEC Documents and of Parent, Aristotle
Merger Sub and Plato Merger Sub, are true, complete and correct
copies of such documents as in effect as of the date of this
Agreement.
Section 4.2 Capitalization
of Parent and Merger Subs.
(a) Since their respective dates of incorporation, none of
Parent or either Merger Sub has carried on any business or
conducted any operations other than the execution of this
Agreement, the performance of its obligations hereunder and
thereunder and matters ancillary thereto.
(b) The authorized capital stock of Parent consists of
100 shares of Parent Common Stock, of which 100 are issued
and outstanding. All of the outstanding shares of Parent Common
Stock have been validly issued, are fully paid and nonassessable
and are owned directly by Aristotle free and clear of any Lien.
The authorized capital stock of Aristotle Merger Sub consists of
100 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
all of which have been validly issued, are fully paid and
nonassessable and are owned directly by Parent free and clear of
any Lien. The authorized capital stock of Plato Merger Sub
consists of 100 shares of common stock, $0.01 par
value per share, all of which have been validly issued, are
fully paid and nonassessable and are owned directly by Parent
free and clear of any Lien. All shares of Parent Common Stock
issued pursuant to Article II shall be duly authorized and
validly issued and free of preemptive rights.
A-27
Section 4.3 Aristotle
Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Aristotle consists of
1,000,000,000 shares of Aristotle Common Stock, and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value
per share (Aristotle Preferred Stock, and
together with the Aristotle Common Stock, the Aristotle
Capital Stock). As of June 30, 2011 there were
(i) 690,577,000 shares of Aristotle Common Stock, and
no shares of Aristotle Preferred Stock, issued,
(ii) 488,205,000 shares of Aristotle Common Stock
outstanding and (iii) 13,919,869 shares of Aristotle
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock
options or stock appreciation rights, vesting of restricted
stock units or vesting of performance shares to acquire shares
of Aristotle Common Stock (whether or not presently vested or
exercisable). Except as set forth above, and for shares of
Aristotle Common Stock reserved for issuance under Aristotle
equity plans, as of June 30, 2011, no shares of capital
stock or other equity securities of Aristotle are issued,
reserved for issuance or outstanding, except for shares of
capital stock of Aristotle issued, after the date set forth in
this sentence, pursuant to the exercise of options under the any
Aristotle stock plan outstanding as of the date set forth in
this sentence. All of the issued and outstanding shares of
Aristotle Common Stock have been, and any shares of Aristotle
Common Stock issued upon the exercise of options to acquire
Aristotle Common Stock or Aristotle SARs or the vesting of
Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards or Aristotle Performance Share
Awards will be, duly authorized and validly issued and are or
will be, fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive
rights. Except as set forth above or in Section 4.3(a) of
the Aristotle Disclosure Letter, as of June 30, 2011, there
were not any outstanding securities, options, warrants, calls,
rights, commitments, agreements, derivative contracts, forward
sale contracts or undertakings of any kind to which Aristotle or
any of its Subsidiaries is a party, or by which Aristotle or any
of its Subsidiaries is bound, obligating Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be issued,
delivered or sold, additional shares of capital stock or other
voting securities of Aristotle or of any Subsidiary of Aristotle
or obligating Aristotle or any Subsidiary of Aristotle to issue,
grant, extend or enter into any such security, option, warrant,
call, right, commitment, agreement, derivative contract, forward
sale contract or undertaking, or obligating Aristotle to make
any payment based on or resulting from the value or price of the
Aristotle Common Stock or of any such security, option, warrant,
call, right, commitment, agreement, derivative contract, forward
sale contract or undertaking. Except for acquisitions, or deemed
acquisitions of Aristotle Common Stock or other equity
securities of Aristotle in connection with (i) the payment
of the exercise price of Aristotle Stock Options with Aristotle
Common Stock (including in connection with net
exercises), (ii) required tax withholding in connection
with the exercise of Aristotle Stock Options and vesting of
Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards and (iii) forfeitures of
Aristotle Stock Options or Aristotle Restricted Stock Awards,
there are no outstanding contractual obligations of Aristotle or
any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem, or otherwise
acquire any shares of Aristotle Capital Stock or the capital
stock of any of its Subsidiaries, other than pursuant to the
Aristotle Benefit Plans. There are no bonds, debentures, notes
or other indebtedness of Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries
having the right to vote (or convertible into, or exchange for,
securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which
stockholders of Aristotle may vote.
(b) Aristotle owns, directly or indirectly, all of the
issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of each of its
Subsidiaries, free and clear of any Liens, except, in the case
of any Subsidiary of Aristotle which is not material to the
business of Aristotle and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect, and all of such
shares are duly authorized and validly issued and are fully
paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights, except as
would not have a material effect on the operation of
Aristotles and its Subsidiaries businesses. Neither
Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any voting
Contract with respect to the voting of any of its securities.
(c) Except as set forth on Section 4.3(c) of the
Aristotle Disclosure Letter, neither Aristotle nor any of its
Subsidiaries directly or indirectly owns as of the date of this
Agreement 5% or more of the capital stock, membership interests,
partnership interests, joint venture interests and other equity
interests in, or any interest convertible or exchangeable or
exercisable for 5% or more of the equity or similar interests in
any Person (other than an Aristotle Subsidiary).
A-28
Section 4.4 Authority;
Execution and Delivery; Enforceability; State Takeover
Statutes.
(a) Each of Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs has full
corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this
Agreement, to perform and comply with each of its obligations
under this Agreement and, subject to the receipt of Aristotle
Stockholder Approval, to consummate the Transactions, including
the Mergers. The execution and delivery by each of Aristotle,
Parent and the Merger Subs of this Agreement, the performance
and compliance by Aristotle, Parent and Merger Subs with each of
its obligations herein and the consummation by it of the
Transactions have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of Aristotle, Parent and the Merger
Subs, subject (i) in the case of the Aristotle Merger, to
receipt of the Aristotle Stockholder Approval and (ii) in
the case of the Mergers, to the approvals of Parent, as sole
stockholder of each of the Merger Sub, which will each be
obtained by written consent immediately after the execution
hereof. Each of Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs has duly
executed and delivered this Agreement and, assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by Plato of this
Agreement, this Agreement constitutes its legal, valid and
binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with
its terms, except as limited by Laws affecting the enforcement
of creditors rights generally, by general equitable
principles or by the discretion of any Governmental Entity
before which any Proceeding seeking enforcement may be brought.
None of Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs nor any of their
affiliates or associates is, as of the
date of this Agreement, nor at any time during the last three
(3) years has been, an interested stockholder
of Plato as defined in DGCL Section 203.
(b) Each of the Board of Directors of Aristotle (the
Aristotle Board) and the Board of Directors
of Parent, at a meeting duly called and held, unanimously
adopted resolutions (i) approving this Agreement and the
consummation of the Transactions upon the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in this Agreement,
(ii) determining that the terms of the Aristotle Merger and
the other Transactions are fair to, and in the best interests
of, Aristotle and its stockholders, (iii) directing that
this Agreement be submitted to the stockholders of Aristotle for
adoption, (iv) recommending that its stockholders adopt
this Agreement (the Aristotle
Recommendation) and (v) declaring that this
Agreement is advisable. Such resolutions are sufficient to
render inapplicable to this Agreement and the Aristotle Merger
the provisions of Section 203. No other Takeover Laws apply
to this Agreement or the Aristotle Merger.
(c) Assuming that on the date of this Agreement neither
Plato nor any of its affiliates or
associates is an interested stockholder
of Aristotle (each term, as defined in DGCL Section 203),
the only vote of holders of any class or series of Aristotle
Capital Stock necessary to adopt this Agreement is the adoption
of this Agreement by the holders of a majority of the shares of
Aristotle Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon
at the Aristotle Stockholders Meeting (in either case, the
Aristotle Stockholder Approval). The
Aristotle Stockholder Approval is the only vote of the holders
of Aristotle Capital Stock necessary to consummate the
Transactions.
Section 4.5 Consents
and Approvals; No Conflicts.
(a) Except for (i) the filing with the SEC of the
preliminary Joint Proxy Statement, the Joint Proxy Statement and
the
Form S-4,
(ii) the filing of the Aristotle Certificate of Merger with
the Secretary of State pursuant to the DGCL, (iii) the
Aristotle Stockholder Approval, (iv) actions required by
applicable Healthcare Regulatory Approvals, (v) filings,
permits, authorizations, consents, notice to and approvals as
may be required under, and other applicable requirements of,
(A) the Exchange Act, (B) the Securities Act,
(C) the rules and regulations of NASDAQ, and (D) the
HSR Act, and any foreign antitrust or competition Laws, and
(vi) such other Consents or other Filings with, any
Governmental Entity the failure of which to obtain or make has
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Aristotle to perform
its obligations hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions, no Consents of, or
Filings with, any Governmental Entity are necessary for the
consummation by Aristotle of the Transactions.
(b) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
Aristotle nor the consummation by Aristotle of the Transactions
nor compliance by Aristotle with any of the terms or provisions
hereof, will (i) conflict with or violate any provision of
the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Aristotle or any
of the similar organizational documents of any of its
Subsidiaries or (ii) assuming that the authorizations,
consents and
A-29
approvals referred to in Section 4.4(a) and the Aristotle
Stockholder Approval are duly obtained in accordance with the
DGCL, (x) violate any (1) Law or (2) Order, in
either case, applicable to Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries
or any of their respective properties or assets, or
(y) violate, conflict with, result in the loss of any
material benefit under, constitute a default (or an event which,
with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a
default) under, result in the termination of or a right of
termination or cancellation under, accelerate the performance
required by, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of
the respective properties or assets of Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions
of any Contract to which Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries is
a party, or by which they or any of their respective properties
or assets may be bound or affected, except, in the case of the
foregoing clauses (x)(1) and (y), as would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Aristotle to perform its obligations hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions.
The foregoing representation does not take into account, and no
representation or warranty set forth in the foregoing
Section 4.5(b) is made concerning, the effect of any Order
applicable to, or Contract (other than this Agreement) of, Plato
or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 4.6 SEC
Documents; Financial Statements; Undisclosed Liabilities.
(a) Aristotle has filed or furnished all reports,
schedules, forms, statements, registration statements,
prospectuses and other documents required to be filed or
furnished by Aristotle with the SEC under the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act since January 1, 2009 (the
Aristotle SEC Documents). None of the
Aristotle Subsidiaries or any Aristotle Affiliate is required to
make any filings with the SEC.
(b) As of its respective filing date, and, if amended, as
of the date of the last amendment prior to the date of this
Agreement, each Aristotle SEC Document (other than the Aristotle
SEC Financial Statements) complied in all material respects with
the requirements of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act, as
the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
promulgated thereunder applicable to such Aristotle SEC Document
(other than the Aristotle SEC Financial Statements) did not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
(c) The consolidated financial statements of Aristotle
included in the Aristotle SEC Documents (including, in each
case, any notes or schedules thereto) and all related
compilations, reviews and other reports issued by
Aristotles accountants with respect thereto (the
Aristotle SEC Financial Statements), comply
as to form in all material respects with applicable accounting
requirements and the published rules and regulations of the SEC
with respect thereto. The Aristotle SEC Financial Statements
fairly present, in all material respects, the financial
condition and the results of operations, cash flows and changes
in stockholders equity of Aristotle (on a consolidated
basis) as of the respective dates of and for the periods
referred to in the Aristotle SEC Financial Statements, and were
prepared in accordance with GAAP (except as otherwise noted
therein) applied on a consistent basis during the periods
involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto),
subject, in the case of interim Aristotle SEC Financial
Statements, to normal year-end adjustments (which are not
material in significance or amount) and the absence of notes.
The books and records of Aristotle and the Aristotle
Subsidiaries are accurate and complete, have been maintained in
accordance with sound business practices and accurately present
and reflect in all material respects all of the transactions and
actions therein described and the Aristotle SEC Financial
Statements have been prepared, in all material respects, in
accordance with such books and records. At the Closing, all such
books and records will be in the possession of Aristotle or the
applicable Aristotle Subsidiary. No financial statements of any
Person other than Aristotle and the Aristotle Subsidiaries are
required by GAAP to be included in the consolidated financial
statements of Aristotle. Except as required by GAAP, Aristotle
has not, between December 31, 2010 and the date of this
Agreement, made or adopted any material change in its accounting
methods, practices or policies in effect on
December 31, 2010.
(d) Aristotle is in compliance in all material respects
with (i) the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and (ii) the applicable listing and corporate
governance rules and regulations of NASDAQ.
(e) Aristotle has made available to Plato true and complete
copies of all material written comment letters from the staff of
the SEC received since January 1, 2008 relating to the
Aristotle SEC Documents and all
A-30
written responses of Aristotle thereto other than with respect
to requests for confidential treatment or which are otherwise
publicly available on the SECs EDGAR system. There are no
outstanding or unresolved comments in comment letters received
from the SEC staff with respect to any Aristotle SEC Documents
and none of the Aristotle SEC Documents (other than confidential
treatment requests) is the subject of ongoing SEC review. There
are no internal investigations, any SEC inquiries or
investigations or other governmental inquiries or
investigations, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, pending or
threatened, in each case regarding any accounting practices of
Aristotle.
(f) Aristotle has established and maintains disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting (as such terms are defined in paragraphs (e) and
(f), respectively, of
Rule 13a-15
and paragraph (e) of
Rule 15d-15
under the Exchange Act) as required by
Rules 13a-15
and 15d-15
under the Exchange Act. Aristotles disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that all information (both
financial and non-financial) required to be disclosed by
Aristotle in the reports that it files or furnishes under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
SEC, and that all such information is accumulated and
communicated to Aristotles management as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make
the certifications required pursuant to Sections 302 and
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Aristotles management has
completed an assessment of the effectiveness of Aristotles
disclosure controls and procedures and, to the extent required
by applicable Law, presented in any applicable Aristotle SEC
Document that is a report on
Form 10-K
or
Form 10-Q,
or any amendment thereto, its conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by such report or amendment based
on such evaluation. Based on Aristotles managements
most recently completed evaluation of Aristotles internal
control over financial reporting, (i) Aristotle had no
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or
operation of its internal control over financial reporting that
would reasonably be expected to adversely affect
Aristotles ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information and (ii) Aristotle does not
have Knowledge of any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in Aristotles internal control over financial
reporting.
(g) Aristotle and the Aristotle Subsidiaries do not have
any liabilities or obligations of any nature (whether absolute
or contingent, asserted or unasserted, known or unknown, primary
or secondary, direct or indirect, and whether or not accrued),
except (i) that, individually or in the aggregate, have not
had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, an Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect, (ii) as disclosed, reflected or
reserved against in the most recent audited balance sheet
included in the Aristotle SEC Financial Statements or the notes
thereto, (iii) for liabilities and obligations incurred in
the ordinary course of business since the date of the most
recent audited balance sheet included in the Aristotle SEC
Financial Statements and (iv) for liabilities and
obligations arising out of or in connection with this Agreement,
the Mergers or the Transactions. As of the date of this
Agreement, Parent has no liabilities other than the obligations
set forth in this Agreement and its obligations under the
Commitment Letter.
(h) Statutory Financial Statements of
Subsidiaries. Aristotle has previously
delivered or made available to Plato true, complete and correct
copies of the statutory financial statements of each Aristotle
Insurance Company Subsidiary, as filed with the applicable
domestic regulators for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2010 and for each subsequent quarterly period, together with
all exhibits and schedules thereto (the Aristotle
Subsidiary SAP Statements). The Aristotle Subsidiary
SAP Statements fairly present, in all material respects, the
respective statutory financial conditions of each of the
Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiaries at the respective dates
thereof, and the statutory results of operations for the periods
then ended in accordance with Applicable SAP applied on a
consistent basis throughout the periods indicated and consistent
with each other, except as otherwise specifically noted therein.
Section 4.7 Absence
of Certain Changes or Events. Since
December 31, 2010, (a) Aristotle and its
Subsidiaries have conducted their businesses in all material
respects only in the ordinary course and in a manner consistent
with past practice and (b) there has not been any event
that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would
reasonably be expected to have an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect. Since December 31, 2010 through the date of this
Agreement, neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries has
taken any action that
A-31
would have constituted a breach of, or required Platos
consent pursuant to, Section 5.2 had the covenants therein
applied since December 31, 2010.
Section 4.8 Information
Supplied. None of the information supplied or
to be supplied by Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs for
inclusion or incorporation by reference in (i) the
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC, and at any time it is amended or
supplemented or at the time it becomes effective under the
Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein
or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, and
(ii) the Joint Proxy Statement will, at the date it or any
amendment or supplement is mailed to holders of the shares of
Aristotle Common Stock and Plato Common Stock and at the time of
the Aristotle Stockholders Meeting and at the time of the Plato
Stockholders Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they
are made, not misleading (except that no representation or
warranty is made by Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs to such
portions thereof that relate expressly to Plato and its
Subsidiaries or to statements made therein based on information
supplied by or on behalf of Plato for inclusion or incorporation
by reference therein). The Joint Proxy Statement will comply as
to form in all material respects with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
Section 4.9 Legal
Proceedings. There are no Proceedings
pending, or to the Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened against
Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective
assets, rights or properties or any of the officers or directors
of Aristotle, except, in each case, for those that, individually
or in the aggregate, have not had, and would not reasonably be
expected to have, an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect. Neither
Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of their
respective properties, rights or assets is or are subject to any
Order, except for those that, individually or in the aggregate,
have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, an
Aristotle Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.10 Compliance
with Laws.
(a) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect, (i) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries are in
compliance and since January 1, 2008, have been in
compliance with all Laws and Orders applicable to Aristotle, any
Aristotle Subsidiary or any assets owned or used by any of them,
and (ii) neither Aristotle nor any Aristotle Subsidiary has
received any written communication during the past two
(2) years from a Governmental Entity that alleges that
Aristotle or an Aristotle Subsidiary is not in compliance with
any Law.
(b) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries (i) are in
compliance and since January 1, 2008 have been in
compliance in all material respects with the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and any other United States and foreign Laws
concerning corrupting payments; (ii) since January 1,
2008, have not been investigated by any Governmental Entity with
respect to, or been given notice by a Governmental Entity of,
any violation by Aristotle of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
or any other United States or foreign Laws concerning corrupting
payments; and (iii) since January 1, 2008 have an
operational and effective Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act/anti-corruption compliance program that includes, at a
minimum, policies, procedures and training intended to enhance
awareness of and compliance by Aristotle or such Aristotle
Subsidiary with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and any other
applicable United States or foreign Laws concerning corrupting
payments.
(c) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries have in effect privacy
compliance and data security programs that include assigned
staff, policies, procedures and training to enhance awareness of
and compliance by Aristotle and the Aristotle Subsidiaries with
relevant United States and applicable foreign Laws concerning
privacy and data security.
Section 4.11 Regulatory
Compliance. Aristotle and each of its
Subsidiaries have all required Permits necessary for the conduct
of their business and the use of their properties and assets, as
presently conducted and used and each of the Permits is valid,
subsisting and in full force and effect, except where the
failure to have or maintain such Permit would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Aristotle to perform its obligation
A-32
hereunder or prevent or materially delay the consummation of any
of the Transactions. The operation of the business of Aristotle
and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted is not, and has not
been since January 1, 2008, in violation of, nor is
Aristotle or its Subsidiaries in default or violation under, any
Permit, and, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, no event has
occurred which, with notice or the lapse of time or both, would
constitute a default or violation of any material terms,
condition or provision of any Permit, except where such default
or violation of such Permit would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Aristotle Material
Adverse Effect. There are no actions pending or, to the
Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened, that seek the revocation,
cancellation or adverse modification of any Permit, except where
such revocation, cancellation or adverse modification would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Aristotle Material Adverse Effect or materially
impair the ability of Aristotle to perform its obligation
hereunder or prevent or materially delay the consummation of any
of the Transactions. Since January 1, 2008, neither
Aristotle nor its Subsidiaries have received or been subject to
any written notice, charge, claim or assertion, or, to the
Knowledge of Aristotle, any other notice, charge, claim,
assertion or action, in each case alleging any violations of
Permits, nor to the Knowledge of Aristotle, has any such notice,
charge, claim or assertion been threatened, except where the
receipt of such notice, charge, claim or assertion would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Aristotle Material Adverse Effect or materially
impair the ability of Aristotle to perform its obligation
hereunder or prevent or materially delay the consummation of any
of the Transactions.
(a) Aristotle and each of its Subsidiaries are in
compliance with, to the extent applicable, all Health Care Laws,
except where any failure to be in compliance with any of the
Health Care Laws would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Aristotle to perform
its obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions. No third-party payment
program has imposed a fine, penalty or other sanction on
Aristotle or its Subsidiaries and none of Aristotle or its
Subsidiaries has been excluded or suspended from participation
in any such program, except as would not reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Since January 1, 2008, (i) neither Aristotle
nor any of its Subsidiaries has received or been subject to any
written notice, charge, claim or assertion alleging any
violation of the Health Care Laws, and to the Knowledge of
Aristotle, no action alleging any violation of any Health Care
Law by Aristotle or its Subsidiaries is currently threatened
against Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries, except where such
notice, charge, claim or assertion would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Aristotle to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions;
and (ii) neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries has
settled, or agreed to settle, any actions brought by any
Governmental Entity for a violation of the Health Care Laws,
except where such settlement or action would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Aristotle to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions.
(c) To the Knowledge of Aristotle, since January 1,
2008, neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries, nor any
director or executive officer of Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries, with respect to actions taken on behalf of
Aristotle or its Subsidiaries, (i) has been assessed a
civil money penalty under Section 1128A of the Social
Security Act or any regulations promulgated thereunder,
(ii) has been excluded from participation in any federal
health care program or state health care program (as such terms
are defined by the Social Security Act), (iii) has been
convicted of any criminal offense relating to the delivery of
any item or service under a federal health care program relating
to the unlawful manufacture, distribution, prescription, or
dispensing of a prescription drug or a controlled substance,
(iv) has been disbarred or disqualified from participation
in regulated activities for any violation or alleged violation
of any Health Care Laws, (v) has been listed on the General
Services Administration List of Parties Excluded from Federal
Programs or (vi) is a party to or subject to any Proceeding
concerning any of the matters described above in
clauses (i) through (iii).
A-33
(d) Aristotle and each of its Subsidiaries are in
compliance with all applicable Healthcare Information Laws,
except for failures to comply with any of the foregoing that
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect.
(e) Aristotle and each of its Subsidiaries (i) are in
compliance with all Laws and any other applicable guidance
relating to the operation of pharmacies, the repackaging of drug
products, the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs or
controlled substances, and the dispensing of prescription drugs
or controlled substances, (ii) are in compliance with all
Laws and any other applicable guidance relating to the labeling,
packaging, advertising, or adulteration of prescription drugs or
controlled substances and (iii) are not subject to any
sanction or other adverse action by any Governmental Entity for
the matters described above in clauses (i) and (ii), except
for such failures to comply or such sanctions described in
clauses (i) through (iii) that would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the ability of
Aristotle to perform its obligation hereunder or prevent or
materially delay the consummation of any of the Transactions.
(f) Each Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary has filed
with the appropriate Governmental Entities, including state
health and insurance regulatory authorities and any applicable
federal regulatory authorities, all material reports,
statements, documents, registrations, filings or submissions
required to be filed by them. As of its respective filing date,
and, if amended, as of the date of the last amendment prior to
the date of this Agreement, each such registration, filing and
submission complied in all material respects with applicable
Law, and no material deficiencies have been asserted by any
Governmental Entity with respect to such registrations, filings
or submissions that have not been cured.
(g) All policy forms and certificates used by Aristotle and
any of its Subsidiaries, the forms of all policies and
certificates on which Aristotle Subsidiary Insurance Agreements
were written and all amendments, endorsements and riders
thereto, and all applications, brochures and marketing materials
pertaining thereto have been approved by all applicable
Governmental Entities or filed with and not objected to by such
Governmental Entities within the period provided by applicable
Law for objection, to the extent required by Law, and comply
with all requirements of Law, except where the failure to obtain
such approval or the failure to comply would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect. Aristotle and each of its Aristotle
Insurance Company Subsidiaries have, separately and in the
aggregate, performed their obligations with respect to the
Aristotle Subsidiary Insurance Agreements, as applicable, in
accordance with the terms of the Aristotle Subsidiary Insurance
Agreements in all material respects.
(h) All premium rates, rating plans and policy terms
established or used by Aristotle or any Aristotle Insurance
Company Subsidiary that are required to be filed with
and/or
approved by Governmental Entities have been so filed
and/or
approved in all material respects and the premiums charged
conform in all material respects to the premiums so filed
and/or
approved and comply in all material respects with the insurance
Laws applicable thereto.
(i) Insurance Laws. Except as
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect, (i) each
of the Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiaries (including the
business, marketing, operations, sales and issuances of
Aristotle Subsidiary Insurance Agreements conducted by or
through agents or otherwise) is, and since January 1, 2008
has been, in compliance with applicable Laws and (ii) no
Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary has received any written
communication during the past two (2) years from a
Governmental Entity that alleges that an Aristotle Insurance
Company Subsidiary is not in compliance with any Law. There is
no pending or, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened charge
by any state insurance regulatory authority that any Aristotle
Insurance Company Subsidiary has allegedly violated, nor is
there any pending or, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened
investigation or enforcement proceeding by any state insurance
regulatory authority with respect to possible violations by any
Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary of, any applicable
insurance Laws, except where such charge, investigation or
enforcement proceeding would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect or materially impair the ability of Aristotle to perform
its obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions.
A-34
Each of the Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiaries has been
duly authorized by the relevant state insurance regulatory
authorities to issue the policies
and/or
contracts of insurance that it is currently writing and in the
states in which it conducts its business, except where the
failure to be so duly authorized would not reasonably be
expected to have an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect or
materially impair the ability of Aristotle to perform its
obligation hereunder or prevent or materially delay the
consummation of any of the Transactions. None of the Aristotle
Insurance Company Subsidiaries is subject to any Order or decree
of any insurance regulatory authority which (i) would,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have
an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect or materially impair the
ability of Aristotle to perform its obligation hereunder or
prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the
Transactions, (ii) relates to material marketing, sales,
trade or underwriting practices (other than routine
correspondence) from and after January 1, 2008 or
(iii) seeks the revocation or suspension of any material
Permit issued pursuant to applicable insurance Law.
Section 4.12 Absence
of Changes in Benefit Plans. From
December 31, 2010 to the date of this Agreement, there has
not occurred other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as specifically set forth in
Aristotles most recent Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed with the SEC any (a) increase in
the compensation (including bonus opportunities) of any of its
directors or executive officers, (b) grant of any severance
or termination pay to any of its executive officers,
(c) grant of equity awards to any director or executive
officer, (d) entry into or amendment of any employment,
consulting, change in control, retention or severance agreement
or arrangement with any executive officers or
(e) establishment, adoption, entry into, freeze or
amendment in any material respect or termination of any
Aristotle Benefit Plan or any action to accelerate entitlement
to compensation or benefits under any Aristotle Benefit Plan or
otherwise for, in each case, the benefit of any director or
executive officer. As used in this Agreement,
Aristotle Benefit Plan means any
employee benefit plan including any employee benefit
plan, as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA and each
stock grant, stock purchase, stock option, severance,
employment,
change-in-control,
fringe benefit, loan, bonus, incentive, sabbatical, medical,
dental, vision, disability, cafeteria benefit, dependent care,
welfare benefit, life insurance or accident insurance,
retirement, supplemental retirement, deferred compensation or
other compensation or benefit plan, agreement, program, policy
or other arrangement, whether or not subject to ERISA,
maintained, entered into or contributed to by Aristotle or any
of its ERISA Affiliates, or to which Aristotle or any of its
ERISA Affiliates is a party, whether written or oral, for the
benefit of any present or former employee, consultant or
director of Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries (including
their dependents or beneficiaries) or with respect to which
Aristotle or any of its ERISA Affiliates has any liability
(contingent or otherwise), other than any schemes or
arrangements mandated by a government outside of the United
States.
Section 4.13 ERISA
Compliance; Excess Parachute Payments.
(a) Schedule 4.13(a) to the Aristotle Disclosure
Letter sets forth a true, correct and complete list of each
material Aristotle Benefit Plan (as defined herein).
(b) No material liability under Title IV of ERISA has
been incurred by Aristotle or any of its ERISA Affiliates which
has not been satisfied in full and no event has occurred and, to
the Knowledge of Aristotle, no condition exists that could
reasonably be likely to result in Aristotle or any of its ERISA
Affiliates incurring a material liability under Title IV of
ERISA. No Aristotle Benefit Plan is a defined benefit pension
plan or is subject to Section 302 or Title IV of ERISA
or Section 412 of the Code. No Aristotle Benefit Plan is a
multiemployer plan within the meaning of Section 3(37) of
ERISA or a multiple employer welfare arrangement as defined in
Section 3(40) or ERISA.
(c) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect, each Aristotle Benefit Plan that is intended to be
qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code is so qualified
and the plan as currently in effect has received a favorable
determination or opinion letter to that effect from the Internal
Revenue Service and Aristotle is not aware of any reason why any
such determination or opinion letter should be revoked or not be
reissued. Each Aristotle Benefit Plan has been maintained in
compliance with its terms and with the requirements prescribed
by any and all statutes, orders, rules and regulations,
including ERISA and the Code, which are applicable to such
Aristotle Benefit Plan with such exceptions as would not be
reasonably expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have
an Aristotle
A-35
Material Adverse Effect. There are no pending or, to the
Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened Proceedings against any
Aristotle Benefit Plan, any fiduciary thereof, Aristotle or any
Subsidiary that could reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect. To the Knowledge of Aristotle, none of Aristotle, any of
its Subsidiaries, any officer of Aristotle or of any Subsidiary
or any of the Aristotle Benefit Plans which are subject to
ERISA, including the Aristotle Benefit Plans, any trusts created
thereunder or any trustee or administrator thereof, has engaged
in a prohibited transaction (as such term is defined
in Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code)
or any other breach of fiduciary responsibility that could
subject Aristotle, any Subsidiary or any officer of Aristotle or
of any Subsidiary to any tax or penalty on prohibited
transactions imposed by such Section 4975 of the Code or to
any material liability under Section 502(i) or 502(1) of
ERISA.
(d) Except in connection with any Non-US Aristotle Benefit
Plan (as defined below), there is no material current or
projected liability in respect of post-employment or
post-retirement health or medical or life insurance benefits for
retired, former or current employees of Aristotle or its
Subsidiaries, except as required to avoid excise tax under
Section 4980B of the Code.
(e) With respect to Aristotle Benefit Plans that are
subject to or governed by the Laws of any jurisdiction other
than the United States (the Non-US Aristotle
Benefit Plans), except as would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle
Material Adverse Effect, (i) all amounts required to be
reserved under each book reserved Non-US Aristotle Benefit Plan
have been so reserved in accordance with GAAP and (ii) each
Non-US Aristotle Benefit Plan required to be registered with a
Governmental Entity has been registered, has been maintained in
good standing with the appropriate Governmental Entities, has
been maintained and operated in all respects in accordance with
its terms and is in compliance with all applicable Laws.
(f) Except as otherwise contemplated under this Agreement
or except pursuant to the terms of the Aristotle Benefit Plans
which are publicly filed with the SEC as of the date of this
Agreement, neither the execution nor delivery of this Agreement
nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
shall, whether alone or in combination with any other event,
result in (i) the accelerated vesting or payment of, or any
increase in, any compensation to any present or former executive
officer or director of Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries or
(ii) the entitlement of any present or former executive
officer or director of Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries to
severance or termination pay or benefits.
(g) No Aristotle Benefit Plan provides for the
gross-up of
any Taxes payable by any individual.
Section 4.14 Employee
and Labor Matters.
(a) Except as listed in Section 4.14(a) of the
Aristotle Disclosure Letter, (A) neither Aristotle nor any
of its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any collective
bargaining agreement, agreement with any works council, or labor
contract, (B) no labor union, labor organization, works
council, or group of employees of Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries has made a pending demand for recognition or
certification, and (C) there are no representation or
certification proceedings or petitions seeking a representation
proceeding presently pending or threatened in writing to be
brought or filed with the National Labor Relations Board or any
other labor relations tribunal or authority. Neither Aristotle
nor any Subsidiary has engaged in any unfair labor practice with
respect to any individuals employed by or otherwise performing
services for Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries (the
Aristotle Business Personnel), and there is
no unfair labor practice complaint or grievance or other
administrative or judicial complaint, action or investigation
pending or, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened in writing
against Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries by the National
Labor Relations Board or any other Governmental Entity with
respect to the Aristotle Business Personnel. There is no labor
strike, dispute, lockout, slowdown or stoppage pending or, to
the Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened against or affecting
Aristotle or any Subsidiary which is reasonably likely to
materially interfere with the respective business activities of
Aristotle or any Subsidiary.
(b) Neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries are
required to provide notice to any work council or similar
representative body prior to the execution of this Agreement.
A-36
(c) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries are and have been in
compliance with all collective bargaining agreements, agreements
with any works council, or labor contracts to which Aristotle or
any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by and with all
applicable Laws respecting employment and employment practices
including, without limitation, all Laws respecting terms and
conditions of employment, health and safety, wages and hours,
child labor, immigration, employment discrimination, disability
rights or benefits, equal opportunity, plant closures and
layoffs, affirmative action, workers compensation, labor
relations and unemployment insurance, except for noncompliance
as would not reasonably be, expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect.
(d) To the Knowledge of Aristotle, no employee of Aristotle
or any of its Subsidiaries at the level of Senior Vice President
or higher is in any respect in violation of any term of any
employment agreement, nondisclosure agreement, common law
nondisclosure obligation, fiduciary duty, noncompetition
agreement, restrictive covenant or other obligation to a former
employer of any such employee relating (A) to the right of
any such employee to be employed by Aristotle or its
Subsidiaries or (B) to the knowledge or use of trade
secrets or proprietary information, except as would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Aristotle Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.15 Environmental
Matters.
(a) Since January 1, 2008, Aristotle and each of its
Subsidiaries has been in material compliance with all
Environmental Laws, which compliance includes, but is not
limited to, the possession of all material Permits and other
material governmental authorizations required under all
Environmental Laws, and compliance with the terms and conditions
thereof. Since January 1, 2008, neither Aristotle or any of
its Subsidiaries have received any communication (written or
oral), that alleges Aristotle or its Subsidiaries is not in such
material compliance. All material Permits and other material
governmental authorizations currently held by Aristotle and its
Subsidiaries pursuant to all Environmental Laws are identified
in Section 4.15(a) of the Aristotle Disclosure Letter.
(b) There is no Environmental Claim pending or, to the
Knowledge of Aristotle, threatened against Aristotle or its
Subsidiaries, or to the Knowledge of Plato against any person or
entity whose liability for any Environmental Claim Aristotle has
retained or assumed either contractually or by operation of law.
(c) To the Knowledge of Aristotle, there are no conditions
or incidents, including, without limitation, the Release of any
Material of Environmental Concern, that could reasonably be
expected to result in any material Environmental Claim against
Aristotle or its Subsidiaries, or against any person or entity
whose liability for any Environmental Claim Aristotle has
retained or assumed either contractually or by operation of law,
or otherwise result in any material costs or liabilities to
Aristotle or its Subsidiaries under Environmental Law.
(d) Without in any way limiting the generality of the
foregoing, to the Knowledge of Aristotle and except as in
material compliance with Environmental Laws, none of the real
property owned by Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries or to the
Knowledge of Aristotle, any leased property, contains any
underground storage tanks; asbestos; toxic molds, deed
restrictions or other engineering controls due to environmental
conditions, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); underground
injection wells; or waste management units; radioactive
materials; or septic tanks or waste disposal pits or lagoons in
which process wastewater or any Materials of Environmental
Concern have been discharged or disposed;
(e) Neither Aristotle nor its Subsidiaries, is required by
any Environmental Law or by virtue of the transactions set forth
herein and contemplated hereby, or as a condition to the
effectiveness of any transactions contemplated hereby,
(i) to perform a site assessment for Materials of
Environmental Concern or (ii) to remove or remediate
Materials of Environmental Concern or (iii) to record or
deliver to any person or entity any disclosure document or
statement pertaining to environmental matters.
(f) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries have provided to Plato
all material environmental site assessments, reports, results of
investigations and audits in the possession, custody, or control
of Aristotle pertaining to (A) environmental condition of
the real properties and operations of Aristotle and its
Subsidiaries, and (B) compliance (or noncompliance) by
Aristotle with any Environmental Laws.
A-37
(g) Notwithstanding any other representation or warranty in
this Article IV, the representations and warranties in this
Section 4.15, together with the representations and
warranties in Sections 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7, constitute the
sole representations and warranties relating to any
Environmental Law, Environmental Claim or Release of any
Material of Environmental Concern.
Section 4.16 Properties. Except
for those matters that, individually or in the aggregate, have
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have an
Aristotle Material Adverse Effect: (A) Aristotle and each
of its Subsidiaries has good, valid and marketable title to, or
valid leasehold or sublease interests or other comparable
contract rights in or relating to all real property of Aristotle
and its Subsidiaries free and clear of all Liens, except for
Permitted Liens and minor defects in title, recorded easements,
restrictive covenants and similar encumbrances of record;
(B) Aristotle and each of its Subsidiaries has complied
with the terms of all leases of real property of Aristotle and
its Subsidiaries and all such leases are in full force and
effect, enforceable in accordance with their terms against
Aristotle or any Subsidiary party thereto and, to the Knowledge
of Aristotle, the counterparties thereto; and (C) neither
Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries has received or provided
any written notice of any event or occurrence that has resulted
or would reasonably be expected to result (with or without the
giving of notice, the lapse of time or both) in a default with
respect to any such lease.
Section 4.17 Tax
Returns and Tax Payments. Except as disclosed
in Section 4.17 of the Aristotle Disclosure Letter,
(a) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries have timely filed (or,
as to Subsidiaries, Aristotle has filed on behalf of such
Subsidiaries) all Tax Returns required to be filed by it, other
than Tax Returns the failure of which to file would not
reasonably be expected to have an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect, and all such Tax Returns are true, correct and complete
in all material respects;
(b) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries have paid (or, as to
Subsidiaries, Aristotle has paid on behalf of such Subsidiaries)
all Taxes (as defined below) shown to be due on such Tax Returns
or has provided (or, as to Subsidiaries, Aristotle has made
provision on behalf of such Subsidiaries) reserves in its
financial statements for any Taxes that have not been paid,
whether or not shown as being due on any Tax Returns;
(c) Neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries has
granted any request that remains in effect for waivers of the
time to assess any Taxes of any material amount;
(d) No claim for unpaid Taxes has been asserted against
Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries in writing by a Tax
authority, which, if resolved in a manner unfavorable to
Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse Effect;
(e) There are no Liens for Taxes upon the assets of
Aristotle or any Subsidiary, except for Permitted Liens;
(f) No audit of any material Tax Return of Aristotle or any
of its Subsidiaries is being conducted by a Tax authority;
(g) Neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
material liability for Taxes of any Person (other than Aristotle
and its Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any comparable provision of state, local or foreign law);
(h) None of Aristotle or its Subsidiaries has been a party
to any listed transaction within the meaning of
Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(2);
(i) In the last five (5) years, none of Aristotle or
its Subsidiaries has distributed stock of another person or has
had its stock distributed by another person, in a transaction
that was purported or intended to be governed in whole or in
part by Section 355 of the Code; and
(j) Neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries has taken
or agreed to take any action that would prevent the Aristotle
Merger and the Plato Merger, taken together, from qualifying as
an exchange within the meaning of Section 351
of the Code.
A-38
Section 4.18 Intellectual
Property.
(a) Section 4.18(a) of the Aristotle Disclosure Letter
sets forth a true and complete list of all Aristotle Material
Intellectual Property currently registered or subject to a
pending application for registration in the name of Aristotle or
any of its Subsidiaries. To the Knowledge of Aristotle,
Aristotle or one of its Subsidiaries is the owner of such
Aristotle Material Intellectual Property.
(b) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an Aristotle Material Adverse
Effect (A) to the Knowledge of Aristotle, Aristotle and its
Subsidiaries own, license or have the right to use all
Intellectual Property used in the operation of their businesses
as currently conducted, free and clear of all Liens other than
Permitted Liens; (B) no Proceedings or Orders are pending
or, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, have been threatened in
writing (including cease and desist letters or requests for a
license) since January 1, 2009 against Aristotle or its
Subsidiaries (1) alleging infringement, misappropriation or
other violation of any Intellectual Property owned by any other
Person or (2) contesting the validity of any Aristotle
Material Intellectual Property owned by Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries; (C) to the Knowledge of Aristotle, the
operation of Aristotle and its Subsidiaries businesses as
currently conducted does not infringe, misappropriate, or
otherwise violate the Intellectual Property of any other Person
and, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, no Person is infringing,
misappropriating, or otherwise violating any Aristotle Material
Intellectual Property owned by Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries; (D) all registrations and applications for
registered Aristotle Material Intellectual Property owned by
Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries are subsisting and
unexpired, have not been abandoned or canceled and to the
Knowledge of Aristotle, are valid and enforceable;
(E) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries take commercially
reasonable actions to protect the confidentiality of the
Aristotle Material Intellectual Property consisting of trade
secrets and other proprietary confidential information; and
(F) Aristotle and its Subsidiaries take commercially
reasonable actions to maintain and protect the integrity,
security and operation (security) of their software,
networks, databases, systems and websites (systems)
(and all information transmitted thereby or stored therein), and
since January 1, 2009 there have been no violations of such
security nor other unauthorized access to information
transmitted by such systems as to which Aristotle or any of its
Subsidiaries was required by applicable Law or their respective
privacy policies to notify any other Person.
Section 4.19 Insurance. All
material Policies with respect to the business and assets of
Aristotle and its Subsidiaries are in full force and effect.
Neither Aristotle nor any of its Subsidiaries is in material
breach or default, and neither Aristotle nor any of its
Subsidiaries has taken any action or failed to take any action
which, with notice or the lapse of time, would constitute such a
breach or default, or permit termination or modification of any
of the Policies. With respect to each of the legal proceedings
set forth in the Aristotle SEC Documents, no such insurer has
informed Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries of any denial of
coverage. Aristotle and its Subsidiaries have not received any
written notice of cancellation of any of the Policies. All
appropriate insurers under the Policies have been timely
notified of all potentially insurable material losses known to
Aristotle and pending litigation, and all appropriate actions
have been taken to timely file all claims in respect of such
insurable matters.
Section 4.20 Financing. Aristotle
has delivered to Plato true and complete fully executed copies
of the commitment letter, dated as of July 20, 2011, among
Aristotle, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.,
including all exhibits, schedules, annexes and amendments to
such letter in effect as of the date of this Agreement (the
Commitment Letter), pursuant to which and
subject to the terms and conditions thereof each of the parties
thereto (other than Aristotle) have severally committed to lend
the amounts set forth therein (the provision of such funds as
set forth therein, but subject to the provisions of
Section 5.11, the Financing) for the
purposes set forth in such Commitment Letter. The Commitment
Letter has not been amended, restated or otherwise modified or
waived prior to the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
and the respective commitments contained in the Commitment
Letter have not been withdrawn, rescinded, amended, restated or
otherwise modified in any respect prior to the execution and
delivery of this Agreement. As of the execution and delivery of
this Agreement, the Commitment Letter is in full force and
effect and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation
of each of Aristotle and, to the Knowledge of Aristotle, the
other parties thereto. There are no conditions precedent or
contingencies (including pursuant to any flex
provisions) related to the funding of
A-39
the full amount of the Financing pursuant to the Commitment
Letter, other than as expressly set forth in the Commitment
Letter. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Commitment
Letter, assuming the accuracy of the Platos
representations and warranties contained in Article III and
assuming compliance by Plato in all material respects with its
covenants contained in Section 5.1, the net proceeds
contemplated from the Financing, together with other financial
resources of Aristotle and the Merger Subs, including cash on
hand and marketable securities of Aristotle and the Merger Subs,
and of Plato and Platos Subsidiaries on the Closing Date,
will, in the aggregate, be sufficient for the satisfaction of
all of Aristotles obligations under this Agreement,
including the payment of any amounts required to be paid
pursuant to Article II and all fees and expenses reasonably
expected to be incurred in connection herewith. As of the date
of this Agreement, (i) (assuming the accuracy of Platos
representations and warranties contained in Article III
hereof) no event has occurred which would constitute a breach or
default (or an event which with notice or lapse of time or both
would constitute a default) on the part of Aristotle or its
Affiliates under the Commitment Letter or, to the Knowledge of
Aristotle, any other party to the Commitment Letter, and
(ii) subject to the satisfaction of the conditions
contained in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 hereof, Aristotle does
not have any reason to believe that any of the conditions to the
Financing will not be satisfied or that the Financing or any
other funds necessary for the satisfaction of all of
Aristotles and its Affiliates obligations under this
Agreement and of all fees and expenses reasonably expected to be
incurred in connection herewith will not be available to
Aristotle on the Closing Date. Except for fee letters with
respect to fees and related arrangements with respect to the
Financing, of which Aristotle has delivered a true, correct and
complete copy to Plato prior to the date hereof (other than with
respect to fee information, but which fee information do not
relate to the amounts or conditionality of, or contain any
conditions precedent to, the funding of the Financing), as of
the date hereof there are no side letters or other agreements,
Contracts or arrangements related to the funding of the full
amount of the Financing other than as expressly set forth in the
Commitment Letter and delivered to Plato prior to the date
hereof. Aristotle has fully paid all commitment fees or other
fees required to be paid on or prior to the date of this
Agreement in connection with the Financing.
Section 4.21 Brokers
Fees. Except for the financial advisors
fees set forth in Section 4.21 of the Aristotle Disclosure
Letter, neither Aristotle nor any of its officers or directors,
nor Parent nor the Merger Subs nor any of their officers, on
behalf of Aristotle, Parent, or the Merger Subs, has employed
any financial advisor, broker or finder in a manner that would
result in any liability of Plato for any brokers fees,
commissions or finders fees in connection with any of the
transactions contemplated hereby or that would result in any
reduction of the consideration payable to the stockholders of
Plato.
Section 4.22 Opinions
of Financial Advisors. The Aristotle
financial advisors have delivered to the Aristotle Board their
respective opinions in writing or orally, in which case, such
opinions will be confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of
the date thereof and based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth therein, the Plato Merger Consideration to
be issued and paid in the Plato Merger is fair to Aristotle from
a financial point of view.
Section 4.23 Certain
Additional Representations. Aristotle has
consulted Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP,
counsel to Aristotle, and believes that it will be able to give
representations reasonably necessary for tax counsel to
Aristotle and tax counsel to Plato to be able to render the
opinions referred to in Sections 6.2(c) and 6.3(c).
Section 4.24 No
Other Representations or Warranties. Except
for the representations and warranties expressly contained in
this Article IV, neither Aristotle nor any of its
Affiliates nor any Person acting on any of their behalf makes
any other express or any implied representations or warranties
with respect to (i) Aristotle or any of its Subsidiaries,
any of their businesses, operations, assets, liabilities,
condition (financial or otherwise) or prospects or any other
matter relating to Aristotle or its Subsidiaries or
(ii) the accuracy or completeness of any documentation,
forecasts or other information provided by Aristotle, any
Affiliate of Aristotle or any Person acting on any of their
behalf to Plato or Parent, any Affiliate of Aristotle or any
Person acting on any of their behalf.
A-40
ARTICLE V
COVENANTS
Section 5.1 Plato
Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Plato Effective
Time. Except as expressly contemplated or
permitted by this Agreement, during the period from the date of
this Agreement to the Plato Effective Time, unless Aristotle
otherwise agrees in writing, Plato shall, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries to, conduct its business in the ordinary course
consistent with past practice and use reasonable best efforts to
(i) preserve intact its present business organization,
(ii) maintain in effect all necessary foreign, federal,
state and local licenses, Permits, consents, franchises,
approvals and authorizations and (iii) maintain
satisfactory relationships with its customers, lenders,
suppliers and others having material business relationships with
it and with Governmental Entities with jurisdiction over health
care related matters. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, and except as set forth in Section 5.1 of the
Plato Disclosure Letter, as expressly contemplated or permitted
by this Agreement, during the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Plato Effective Time, Plato shall not, and
shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, without the prior
written consent of Aristotle in each instance:
(a) amend the Plato Charter or Plato By-laws or other
similar organizational documents (whether by merger,
consolidation or otherwise);
(b) (i) issue, sell, grant, dispose of, pledge or
otherwise encumber, or authorize or propose the issuance, sale,
disposition or pledge or other encumbrance of (A) any
additional shares of its capital stock or any securities or
rights convertible into, exchangeable for, or evidencing the
right to subscribe for any shares of its capital stock, or any
rights, warrants, options, calls, restricted stock units (RSUs),
commitments or any other agreements of any character to purchase
or acquire any shares of its capital stock or any securities or
rights convertible into, exchangeable for, or evidencing the
right to subscribe for, any shares of capital stock of Plato or
any of its Subsidiaries, or (B) any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of, or in substitution for, any shares of
capital stock or options of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries
outstanding on the date hereof, other than, in the case of
clauses (A) and (B), the (x) issuance of shares of
Plato Common Stock pursuant to the exercise of Plato Stock
Options, vesting of Plato RSUs and Plato PSUs and vesting,
exercise or settlement of Plato DSUs under the Plato Benefit
Plans in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice and (y) grant of any options or rights under the
Plato Benefit Plans after the date of this Agreement to purchase
or acquire shares of Plato Common Stock in an amount not in
excess of 11,300,000 shares to directors and employees, and
executive officers in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice (in addition, if the Closing Date occurs on
or after April 1, 2012, Plato shall be permitted to
make (A) annual grants to directors and (B) grants
pursuant to the terms of its collective bargaining agreements in
effect as of the date of this Agreement or as entered into in
compliance with Section 5.1(k) below); (ii) accelerate
the vesting of any Plato Stock Options, Plato RSUs, Plato PSUs
or Plato DSUs, except as may be required pursuant to the terms
of this Agreement or such Plato Benefit Plans as in effect on
the date hereof; (iii) redeem, purchase or otherwise
acquire, or propose to redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire,
any of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Plato or any
of its Subsidiaries (other than pursuant to the Plato Benefit
Plans); (iv) split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any
shares of its capital stock or (v) declare, set aside for
payment or pay any dividend, or make any other actual,
constructive or deemed distribution, in respect of any shares of
its capital stock or otherwise make any payments to its
stockholders in their capacity as such;
(c) (i) other than borrowings under Platos
credit facilities and other lines of credit in existence on the
date of this Agreement and any renewals, refinancings or
extensions of the credit facilities and lines of credit set
forth on Section 5.1(c) of the Plato Disclosure Letter that
are effected on substantially the same terms (including,
covenants and provisions regarding the effect of a change of
control and with maturity dates and mandatory prepayments or
redemptions no earlier than the maturity date or any mandatory
prepayment or redemption applicable to the debt being refinanced
or replaced) and in principal amounts not in excess, of such
debt refinanced in effect on the date of this Agreement, incur
any new indebtedness for borrowed money or modify in any
material respect the terms of any existing indebtedness for
borrowed money or assume, guarantee or endorse or otherwise
become responsible for any such
A-41
indebtedness of any Person other than a wholly owned Subsidiary,
make any loans or advances to any Person other than a wholly
owned Subsidiary or issue or sell any debt securities or calls,
options, warrants, or other rights to acquire any debt
securities of Plato or its Subsidiaries, enter into any
keep well or Contract to maintain any financial
statement condition of another Person other than an Affiliate or
enter into any arrangement (including any capital lease) having
the economic effect of the foregoing other than the incurrence
of unsecured indebtedness or similar obligations less than
$75 million individually and $300 million in the
aggregate which are repayable at any time without a prepayment
penalty, in which case, such unsecured indebtedness shall not
have financial or other covenants any more onerous than those
set forth in the existing publicly traded indebtedness of Plato;
provided that no indebtedness incurred by Plato or its
Subsidiaries shall have any voting rights associated therewith
and any amendment or modification to any such indebtedness shall
be subject to the limitations above or (ii) redeem,
repurchase, prepay, defease or cancel any indebtedness for
borrowed money, other than (1) as required in accordance
with its terms or (2) in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
(d) sell, transfer, license or otherwise dispose of by any
means, or agree to sell, transfer, license or otherwise dispose
of by any means, any of its material properties, assets,
operations, product lines or businesses (including Intellectual
Property) except for sales, transfers or dispositions by any
means, and agreements for any of the foregoing, (A) in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
(B) pursuant to contracts in force on the date of this
Agreement, (C) dispositions of obsolete or worthless assets
or (D) transfers among Plato and its Subsidiaries;
(e) make any acquisition of, or investment in, a business,
by purchase of stock, securities or assets, merger or
consolidation, or contributions to capital, in any such case
outside the ordinary course of business (other than such
transactions among Plato and any of its Subsidiaries or pursuant
to Contracts in effect as of the date of this Agreement) with a
value or purchase price in excess of $60 million,
individually, or $250 million in the aggregate when taken
with all other such ordinary course acquisitions or investments,
or, in any case, that is or would have any reasonable
possibility of preventing or delaying the Closing beyond the
Outside Date (as the same may be extended) or could increase the
likelihood of a failure to satisfy the conditions set forth in
Sections 6.1(c) or 6.1(e);
(f) enter into a new line of business directly or
indirectly;
(g) make or authorize any payment of, accrual or commitment
for, capital expenditures in any twelve (12) month period
in excess of $50 million in the aggregate more than the
amount listed on the budget previously made available to
Aristotle for such period;
(h) enter into, modify, amend, continue, cancel, renew or
terminate any contract or waive, release or assign any material
rights or claims thereunder, which if so entered into, modified,
amended, terminated, waived, released or assigned would
reasonably be expected to (1) prevent or materially delay
or impair the ability of Plato and its Subsidiaries to
consummate the Mergers, or (2) materially impair the
ability of Plato and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to
conduct their business in ordinary course consistent with past
practice;
(i) extend, renew or enter into any Contracts containing
non-compete or exclusivity provisions that would materially
restrict or limit the operations of Plato and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole; provided, that, no such non-compete or
exclusivity limitations shall apply to the Affiliates of Plato
except in the case of extensions and renewals to existing
Contracts on the same terms;
(j) except as required under existing plans and
arrangements as of the date of this Agreement or as required by
applicable Law, (i) grant or increase any severance or
termination pay or supplemental retirement or post-employment
benefit to (or materially amend any existing arrangement with)
any director or executive officer, (ii) increase benefits
payable under any existing severance or termination pay policies
or employment agreements, (iii) enter into any employment,
consulting, indemnification, severance, termination, deferred
compensation or other similar agreement (or materially amend any
such existing agreement) with any director or executive officer,
(iv) establish, adopt or materially amend any
A-42
material bonus, profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement,
deferred compensation, compensation, stock option, restricted
stock or other benefit plan or arrangement covering any
director, officer, consultant or employee, (v) increase,
grant or award any compensation, bonus or other benefits payable
to any director or executive officer, except (1) for
merit-based pay increases for 2012 (and, to the extent based on
salary, any corresponding increases in annual bonus or long-term
incentive opportunities) granted in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice and (2) as permitted
by Section 5.1(b) or Section 5.12 or (vi) enter
into any third-party Contract with respect to a Plato Benefit
Plan (including, without limitation, contracts for the provision
of services to such Plato Benefit Plan, including benefits
administration) having a term of greater than one (1) year
and providing for payments by Plato having a value, estimated as
of the date of such Contract, of greater than $2,000,000, other
than (1) a Contract that is terminable on less than
180 days notice without penalty, (2) a financial
renewal, in the ordinary course of business, of a Contract
existing as of the date of this Agreement, or (3) a
Contract that does not increase Platos annual costs by
more than 6% over the cost of an analogous Contract existing as
of the date hereof;
(k) except in the ordinary course of business and except
for any such action which involves the implementation of a new,
or new participation in, a defined benefit pension plan, retiree
medical plan, multiemployer pension or welfare plan or severance
plan or program, execute, adopt, amend or terminate any
collective bargaining Contract;
(l) settle, or offer or propose to settle any litigation or
other Proceeding or dispute (i) for an amount in excess of
$50 million or (ii) which would include any
non-monetary relief that would materially affect Plato, its
Subsidiaries or its Affiliates from and after the Closing Date;
(m) except as required or permitted by GAAP or as advised
by Platos regular public independent accountant, make any
change in financial accounting methods, principles or practices
materially affecting the reported consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations of Plato;
(n) authorize or adopt, or publicly propose, a plan or
agreement of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution of
Plato or any of its material Subsidiaries;
(o) outside the ordinary course of Platos
administration of its Tax matters, adopt or change any material
method of Tax accounting, make or change any material Tax
election or file any amended material Tax Return;
(p) Subject to Section 5.8, take any action (or omit
to take any action) if such action (or omission), at the time of
such action (or omission), would reasonably be expected to
result in any of the conditions to the Mergers set forth in
Article VI not being satisfied; or
(q) agree, resolve or commit to take any of the actions
prohibited by this Section 5.1.
Section 5.2 Aristotle
Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Plato Effective
Time. Except as expressly contemplated or
permitted by this Agreement, during the period from the date of
this Agreement to the Plato Effective Time, unless Plato
otherwise agrees in writing, Aristotle and Parent shall, and
shall cause their respective Subsidiaries to conduct its
business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice
and use reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve intact its
present business organization, (ii) maintain in effect all
necessary foreign, federal, state and local licenses, Permits,
consents, franchises, approvals and authorizations,
(iii) keep available the services of its directors,
executive officers and key employees and (iv) maintain
satisfactory relationships with its customers, lenders,
suppliers and others having material business relationships with
it and with Governmental Entities with jurisdiction over health
care related matters. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, and except as set forth in Section 5.2 of the
Aristotle Disclosure Letter, as expressly contemplated or
permitted by this Agreement, during the period from the date of
this Agreement to the Plato Effective Time, Aristotle and Parent
shall not, and shall not permit any of their respective
Subsidiaries to, without the prior written consent of Plato in
each instance:
(a) Subject to Section 1.5, amend Aristotles,
Parents or the Merger Subs certificates of
incorporation, by-laws or other similar organizational documents
(whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise) in a manner that
would adversely affect the consummation of the Mergers or affect
the holders of Plato
A-43
Common Stock whose shares may be converted into Parent Common
Stock at the Aristotle Effective Time in a manner different than
holders of Parent Common Stock prior to the Aristotle Effective
Time;
(b) (i) split, combine, subdivide or reclassify any
shares of its capital stock or (ii) declare, set aside for
payment or pay any dividend or distribution, or make any other
actual, constructive or deemed distribution, in respect of any
shares of its capital stock or otherwise make any payments or
distributions to its stockholders in their capacity as such;
provided, that, the foregoing shall not prohibit any
purchases made by any Aristotle Benefit Plan or trusts for the
benefit of employees of Aristotle or its employees, in each
case, in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(c) enter into any agreement to acquire another business or
effect any transaction that, at the time thereof, would have any
reasonable possibility of preventing or delaying the Closing
beyond the Outside Date (as the same may be extended) or could
increase the likelihood of a failure to satisfy the conditions
set forth in Sections 6.1(c) or 6.1(e);
(d) enter into, modify, amend, continue, cancel, renew or
terminate any contract or waive, release or assign any material
rights or claims thereunder, which if so entered into, modified,
amended, terminated, waived, released or assigned would
reasonably be expected to (1) prevent or materially delay
or impair the ability of Aristotle and its Subsidiaries to
consummate the Mergers and other Transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, or (2) materially impair the ability of
Aristotle and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to conduct
their business in ordinary course consistent with past practice;
(e) except as required or permitted by GAAP or as advised
by Aristotles regular public independent accountant, make
any change in financial accounting methods, principles or
practices materially affecting the reported consolidated assets,
liabilities or results of operations of Aristotle;
(f) authorize or adopt, or publicly propose, a plan or
agreement of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution of
Parent, Aristotle or any of Aristotles material
Subsidiaries ;
(g) outside the ordinary course of Aristotles
administration of its Tax matters, adopt or change any material
method of Tax accounting, make or change any material Tax
election or file any amended material Tax Return;
(h) subject to Section 5.8, take any action (or omit
to take any action) if such action (or omission), at the time of
such action (or omission), would reasonably be expected to
result in any of the conditions to the Mergers set forth in
Article VI not being satisfied; or
(i) agree, resolve or commit to take any of the actions
prohibited by this Section 5.2.
Section 5.3 Preparation
of the
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meetings.
(a) As promptly as practicable after the execution of this
Agreement, (i) Aristotle and Plato shall jointly prepare
and Aristotle and Plato, as applicable, shall file with the SEC
the Joint Proxy Statement to be sent to the stockholders of
Aristotle relating to the Aristotle Stockholders Meeting
and to the stockholders of Plato relating to the Plato
Stockholders Meeting and (ii) Parent and Aristotle
shall prepare (with Platos reasonable cooperation) and
file with the SEC the
Form S-4,
in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a
prospectus, in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of the Parent Common Stock to be issued in
(A) the Plato Merger and (B) the Aristotle Merger.
Each of Aristotle and Parent shall use its reasonable best
efforts to have the
Form S-4
declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as
practicable after such filing (including by responding to
comments of the SEC), and, prior to the effective date of the
Form S-4,
Aristotle and Parent shall take all action reasonably required
(other than qualifying to do business in any jurisdiction in
which it is not now so qualified or filing a general consent to
service of process in any such jurisdiction) to be taken under
any applicable state securities Laws in connection with the
issuance of Parent Common Stock. Plato shall furnish all
information as may be reasonably requested by Aristotle and
Plato in connection with any such action and the preparation,
filing and distribution of the
Form S-4
and the Joint Proxy Statement. As promptly as practicable after
the
Form S-4
shall have become effective, each of Aristotle and Plato shall
use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy
Statement to be mailed to its respective stockholders. No filing
of, or amendment or supplement to, the
Form S-4
will be made by Parent,
A-44
and no filing of, or amendment or supplement to, the Joint Proxy
Statement will be made by Parent, Aristotle or Plato, in each
case without providing the other party with a reasonable
opportunity to review and comment thereon. If at any time prior
to the Plato Effective Time any information relating to Parent,
Aristotle or Plato, or any of their respective Affiliates,
directors or officers, should be discovered by Aristotle, Parent
or Plato which should be set forth in an amendment or supplement
to either the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement, so that either such document would
not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they are made, not
misleading, the party that discovers such information shall
promptly notify the other parties hereto and an appropriate
amendment or supplement describing such information shall be
promptly filed with the SEC and, to the extent required by Law,
disseminated to the stockholders of Aristotle and Plato. Each
party shall notify the other promptly of the time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, of the issuance of any stop order or
suspension of the qualification of the Parent Common Stock
issuable in connection with the Mergers for offering or sale in
any jurisdiction, or of the receipt of any comments from the SEC
or the staff of the SEC and of any request by the SEC or the
staff of the SEC for amendments or supplements to the Joint
Proxy Statement or the
Form S-4
or for additional information and shall supply each other with
copies of all correspondence between it or any of its
Representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or its staff, on
the other hand, with respect to the Joint Proxy Statement, the
Form S-4
or the Mergers.
(b) Plato shall, as soon as practicable following
effectiveness of the
Form S-4,
duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its
stockholders (the Plato Stockholders Meeting)
for the purpose of seeking the Plato Stockholder Approval. If
the Plato Board has not made a Plato Adverse Recommendation
Change, Plato shall, through the Plato Board, make the Plato
Recommendation, include such Plato Recommendation in the Joint
Proxy Statement, and use its reasonable best efforts to
(i) solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the
adoption of this Agreement and the Transactions, including the
Plato Merger and (ii) take all other action necessary or
advisable to secure the Plato Stockholder Approval. Except as
expressly permitted in Sections 5.4(b) and 5.4(d), neither
the Plato Board nor any committee thereof shall
(i) withhold, withdraw or modify or qualify, or propose
publicly to withhold, withdraw or modify or qualify, in a manner
adverse to Aristotle, the approval, determination of
advisability, or recommendation by such Board of Directors or
such committee of this Agreement, the Mergers, and the other
Transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) make any other
public statement in connection with the Plato Stockholders
Meeting by or on behalf of such Board of Directors that would
reasonably be expected to have the same effect or
(iii) approve, determine to be advisable, or recommend, or
propose publicly to approve, determine to be advisable, or
recommend, any Takeover Proposal ((i), (ii) and
(iii) being referred to as a Plato Adverse
Recommendation Change). Notwithstanding any Plato
Adverse Recommendation Change, unless this Agreement is
terminated in accordance with its terms, the obligations of the
parties hereunder shall continue in full force and effect.
(c) Aristotle shall, as soon as practicable following
effectiveness of the
Form S-4,
duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its
stockholders (the Aristotle Stockholders
Meeting) for the purpose of seeking the Aristotle
Stockholder Approval. If the Aristotle Board has not made an
Aristotle Adverse Recommendation Change, Aristotle shall,
through the Aristotle Board, make the Aristotle Recommendation,
include such Aristotle Recommendation in the Joint Proxy
Statement, and use its reasonable best efforts to
(i) solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the
adoption of this Agreement and the Transactions, including the
Aristotle Merger and (ii) take all other action necessary
or advisable to secure the Aristotle Stockholder Approval.
Except as expressly permitted in Sections 5.4(b) and
5.4(d), neither the Aristotle Board nor any committee thereof
shall (i) withhold, withdraw or modify or qualify, or
propose publicly to withhold, withdraw or modify or qualify, in
a manner adverse to Plato, the approval, determination of
advisability, or recommendation by such Board of Directors or
such committee of this Agreement, the Mergers, and the other
Transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) make any other
public statement in connection with the Aristotle Stockholders
Meeting by or on behalf of such Board of Directors that would
reasonably be expected to have the same effect or
(iii) approve, determine to be advisable, or recommend, or
propose publicly to approve, determine to be advisable, or
recommend, any Takeover Proposal ((i), (ii) and
(iii) being referred to as a Aristotle Adverse
Recommendation Change). Notwithstanding any Aristotle
Adverse Recommendation Change, unless this Agreement is
terminated in accordance with its terms, the obligations of the
parties hereunder shall continue in full force and effect.
A-45
Section 5.4 No
Solicitation; No-Shop.
(a) Each of Plato and Aristotle shall immediately cease any
discussions or negotiations with any parties that may be ongoing
with respect to a Takeover Proposal (as hereinafter defined) and
shall seek to have returned to Plato or Aristotle any
confidential information that has been provided in any such
discussions or negotiations. From the date hereof until the
earlier of the Plato Effective Time or the date of termination
of this Agreement in accordance with Article VII, each of
Plato and Aristotle shall not, nor shall it permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, nor shall it authorize or permit any of its
officers, directors or employees or any Affiliate, investment
banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other
representative retained by it or any of its Subsidiaries to,
directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly
encourage (including by way of furnishing information which has
not been previously publicly disseminated), or take any other
action designed to facilitate, any inquiries or the making of
any proposal which constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to
lead to, any Takeover Proposal, (ii) engage in any
discussions or negotiations regarding any Takeover Proposal;
provided, however, that (x) such party may
ascertain facts from the party making such Takeover Proposal for
the sole purpose of the Plato Board or the Aristotle Board, as
applicable, informing itself about the Takeover Proposal and the
party that made it and (y) if, prior to obtaining Plato
Stockholder Approval (in the case of Plato) or the Aristotle
Stockholder Approval (in the case of Aristotle), following the
receipt of a Superior Proposal (as hereinafter defined) or a
proposal which is reasonably expected to lead to a Superior
Proposal that in either case was not, directly or indirectly,
solicited, initiated or knowingly encouraged in violation of
sub-clause (i)
above, the Plato Board or the Aristotle Board, as applicable,
determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal
counsel, that a failure to take action with respect to such
Takeover Proposal, as applicable, would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties to Platos stockholders or
Aristotles stockholders, as applicable, under applicable
law, Plato or Aristotle may, in response to such Takeover
Proposal, as applicable, and subject to compliance with
Section 5.4(c), (A) furnish information with respect
to Plato or Aristotle, as applicable, to the party making such
Takeover Proposal pursuant to a confidentiality agreement that
contains provisions not less favorable to Plato or Aristotle, as
the case may be, than those contained in the Confidentiality
Agreement (excluding those provisions added by that certain
letter agreement, dated as of July 5, 2011, between
Aristotle and Plato) and that in any event does not prohibit or
restrain the making of a Takeover Proposal and, with respect to
competitively sensitive information, pursuant to a customary
clean-room arrangement; provided that
(1) such confidentiality agreement may not include any
provision calling for an exclusive right to negotiate with Plato
or Aristotle, as applicable, and (2) Plato advises
Aristotle or Aristotle advises Plato, as applicable, of all such
nonpublic information delivered to such person substantially
concurrently with its delivery to the requesting party), and
(B) engage in discussions or negotiations with such party
regarding such Takeover Proposal. Each of Plato and Aristotle
agrees not to waive or fail to enforce any provision of any
confidentiality or standstill agreement to which it is a party
relating to a potential or actual Takeover Proposal.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
including Section 5.3 but subject to compliance with this
Section 5.4, prior to receipt of the Plato Stockholder
Approval, the Plato Board may, or, prior to receipt of the
Aristotle Stockholder Approval, the Aristotle Board may, in
response to any Takeover Proposal, effect a Plato Adverse
Recommendation Change or Aristotle Adverse Recommendation
Change, as applicable, and subject to compliance with this
Section 5.4(b) and Sections 7.3(h), as applicable,
terminate this Agreement in order to enter into a binding
agreement providing for a Superior Proposal, if (i) the
Plato Board or the Aristotle Board concludes in good faith,
after consultation with Platos or Aristotles outside
financial advisors and outside legal counsel, that such Takeover
Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal; (ii) the Plato
Board or the Aristotle Board concludes in good faith, after
consultation with Platos or Aristotles outside legal
counsel, that the failure to make a Plato Adverse Recommendation
Change or Aristotle Adverse Recommendation Change would be
inconsistent with the exercise of its fiduciary duties to the
stockholders of Plato or Aristotle under applicable Laws;
(iii) the board affecting the recommendation change, or
seeking to terminate the Agreement as provided above, provides
the other party six (6) Business Days prior written notice
of its intention to take such action, which notice shall include
the information with respect to such Superior Proposal that is
specified in Section 5.4(c), as well as a copy of such
Takeover Proposal (it being agreed that neither the delivery of
such notice by a party hereto nor any public announcement
thereof that such party determines that is it required to make
under applicable Law shall constitute an Adverse Recommendation
Change by such
A-46
party unless and until such party shall have failed at or prior
to the end of the period referred to in (iv) below (and,
upon the occurrence of such failure, such notice and such public
announcement shall constitute an Adverse Recommendation Change)
to publicly announce that it (A) was recommending the
Transactions and (B) has determined that such other
Takeover Proposal (taking into account in (A) any
modifications or adjustments made to the Transactions and agreed
to by the parties hereto and in (B) any modifications or
adjustments made to such other Takeover Proposal) is not a
Superior Proposal and has publicly rejected such Takeover
Proposal; (iv) during the six (6) Business Days
following such written notice (or such shorter period as is
specified below), the board effecting the recommendation change
and, if requested by other party, its Representatives have
negotiated in good faith with the other party regarding any
revisions to the terms of the Transactions proposed by the other
party in response to such Superior Proposal; and (v) at the
end of the six (6) Business Day period described in the
foregoing clause (iv), the Plato Board or Aristotle Board
concludes in good faith, after consultation with Platos or
Aristotles outside legal counsel and financial advisors
(and taking into account any adjustment or modification of the
terms of this Agreement to which the other party has agreed in
writing), that the Takeover Proposal continues to be a Superior
Proposal and that the failure to make a Plato Adverse
Recommendation Change or Aristotle Adverse Recommendation Change
would be inconsistent with the exercise by the Plato Board or
Aristotle Board of its fiduciary duties to the stockholders of
Plato or Aristotle under applicable Laws. Any material amendment
or modification to any Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a
new Takeover Proposal for purposes of this Section 5.4;
provided, however, that the notice period and the
period during which the board effecting the recommendation
change and its Representatives are required to negotiate in good
faith with the other party regarding any revisions to the terms
of the Transactions proposed by the other party in response to
such new Takeover Proposal pursuant to clause (v) above
shall expire on the later to occur of (x) three
(3) Business Days after the board effecting the
recommendation change provides written notice of such new
Takeover Proposal to the other party and (y) the end of the
original six (6) Business Day period described in
clause (v) above.
(c) In addition to the obligations of Plato and Aristotle
set forth in Sections 5.4(a) and 5.4(b) Plato or Aristotle
shall promptly, and in any event no later than
24-hours
after it receives any Takeover Proposal, advise the other party
orally and in writing of any request for confidential
information in connection with a Takeover Proposal or of any
Takeover Proposal, the material terms and conditions of such
request or Takeover Proposal and the identity of the person
making such request or Takeover Proposal and shall keep the
other party promptly advised of all changes to the material
terms of any Takeover Proposal. Each of Plato and Aristotle
agrees that subject to applicable restrictions under Laws
applicable to Plato or Aristotle and their Subsidiaries, it
shall, prior to or concurrent with the time it is provided to
any third parties, provide to the other party any non-public
information concerning Plato or Aristotle and their Subsidiaries
that Plato or Aristotle provided to any third party in
connection with any Takeover Proposal which was not previously
provided to the other party.
(d) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit or restrict
the Plato Board or Aristotle Board, in circumstances not
involving or relating to a Takeover Proposal, from effecting a
Plato Adverse Recommendation Change or Aristotle Adverse
Recommendation Change if (and only if) the Plato Board or the
Aristotle Board, as applicable concludes in good faith, after
consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to
take such action would be inconsistent with the exercise of its
fiduciary duties to the stockholders of Plato or Aristotle under
applicable Laws.
(e) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall prohibit the
Aristotle Board or the Plato Board from (i) taking and
disclosing to their stockholders of a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act or making a statement
contemplated by Item 1012(a) of
Regulation M-A
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act, (ii) making any
disclosure to their stockholders if the Plato Board or Aristotle
Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its
outside counsel, that the failure to make such disclosure would
be inconsistent with its duties to the stockholders of Plato or
Aristotle under applicable Laws; or (iii) making accurate
disclosure to their stockholders of factual information
regarding the business, financial condition or results of
operations of Aristotle or Plato or the fact that a Takeover
Proposal has been made, the identity of the party making such
proposal or the material terms of such proposal (and such
disclosure shall not be deemed to be an Aristotle Adverse
Recommendation Change or a Plato Adverse
A-47
Recommendation Change, as applicable), so long as (A) any
such disclosure includes the Aristotle Recommendation or the
Plato Recommendation, as applicable, without any modification or
qualification thereof or continues the prior recommendation of
the Aristotle Board or Plato Board, as the case may be, and
(B) does not contain either an express Aristotle Adverse
Recommendation Change (without giving effect to clause (ii)
of the definition thereof) or an express Plato Adverse
Recommendation Change (without giving effect to clause (ii)
of the definition thereof), as applicable, or any other
statements by or on behalf of the Board of Directors of such
party which would reasonably be expected to have the same effect
as an Adverse Recommendation Change.
(f) For purposes of this Agreement:
(i) Takeover Proposal means any
inquiry, proposal or offer, or a statement made publicly or to
Plato or Aristotle, as the case may be, of an intention to make
a proposal or offer, from any Person (other than Plato,
Aristotle, Parent and their Subsidiaries) relating to any direct
or indirect acquisition or purchase of 15% or more of the
consolidated assets (including equity interests in Subsidiaries)
of Plato or Aristotle and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
15% or more of any class of equity securities of Plato or
Aristotle, any tender offer or exchange offer that if
consummated would result in any person beneficially owning 15%
or more of any class of equity securities of Plato or Aristotle,
or any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business
combination, recapitalization, extraordinary dividend or self
tender offer, liquidation, dissolution, or similar transaction
involving Plato or Aristotle or any of their Subsidiaries, other
than the Transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(ii) Superior Proposal means a
bona fide written Takeover Proposal from any Person (other than
Plato, Aristotle and their Subsidiaries) providing for the
direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 50% or more of the
consolidated assets (including equity interests in Subsidiaries)
of Plato or Aristotle and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
50% or more of any class of equity securities or voting power of
Plato or Aristotle, any tender offer or exchange offer that if
consummated would result in any Person beneficially owning 50%
or more of any class of equity securities or voting power of
Plato or Aristotle, or any merger, consolidation, share
exchange, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation,
dissolution or similar transaction involving Plato or Aristotle
or any of their Subsidiaries (other than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement) for which the third party has
demonstrated that the financing for such offer is fully
committed or is reasonably likely to be obtained, in each case
as determined by the Plato Board or the Aristotle Board in its
good faith judgment (after receiving the advice of independent
financial advisors and outside counsel) and which the Plato
Board or Aristotle Board, as applicable, has determined in its
good faith judgment is reasonably likely to be consummated in
accordance with its terms, and, if consummated, would result in
a transaction more favorable to its stockholders from a
financial point of view than the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
Section 5.5 Publicity. The
initial press release with respect to the execution of this
Agreement shall be a joint press release reasonably acceptable
to Aristotle and Plato. Thereafter, Aristotle (unless the
Aristotle Board has made an Aristotle Adverse Recommendation
Change) and Plato (unless the Plato Board has made a Plato
Adverse Recommendation Change) will use their respective
reasonable best efforts to consult with the other party before
(a) participating in any media interviews,
(b) engaging in meetings or calls with analysts,
institutional investors or other similar Persons and
(c) providing any statements which are public or are
reasonably likely to become public, in any such case to the
extent relating to the Transactions (a Public
Statement). In addition, unless the Aristotle Board
has made an Aristotle Adverse Recommendation Change or the Plato
Board has made a Plato Adverse Recommendation Change, Aristotle
and Plato agree to cause their respective directors and
executives officers to refrain from taking any position in any
such Public Statement that is (x) contrary to the positions
previously taken by Plato and Aristotle with respect to this
Agreement and the Transactions, including the Mergers, or
(y) reasonably likely to have a significant, adverse impact
on the ability of the parties hereto to consummate the
Transactions.
Section 5.6 Notification
of Certain Matters. Either party shall give
prompt notice to the other party if any of the following occur
after the date of this Agreement: (i) receipt of any notice
or other communication in writing from any Person alleging that
the consent or approval of such third party is or may be
required in
A-48
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
(ii) receipt of any notice or other communication from any
Governmental Entity, the NYSE or NASDAQ (or any other securities
market) in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement; or (iii) such party becoming aware of the
occurrence of an event that could materially prevent or delay
the consummation of the Transactions or that would reasonably be
expected to result in any of the conditions to the Mergers set
forth in Article VI not being satisfied; provided,
however, that the delivery of any notice pursuant to this
Section 5.6 shall not limit or otherwise affect the
remedies of Plato, Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs
available hereunder and no information delivered pursuant to
this Section 5.6 shall update any section of the Plato
Disclosure Letter or the Aristotle Disclosure Letter.
Section 5.7 Access
to Information.
(a) Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable Laws
relating to the exchange of information, each party shall and
shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to, afford to the officers,
employees, accountants, counsel and other Representatives of the
other party, during normal business hours during the period
prior to the Effective Times, reasonable access (including for
the purpose of coordinating transition planning with employees,
but not for purposes of conducting environmental site
assessments) to all its and its Subsidiaries properties,
books, contracts, commitments and records, and to its and its
Subsidiaries officers, employees, accountants, counsel and
other Representatives and, during such period, each party shall,
and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, promptly make available to
the other party, subject, in the case of competitively sensitive
information, to any customary clean-room
arrangements agreed between the parties, (i) a copy of each
report, schedule, registration statement and other document
filed or received by it during such period pursuant to the
requirements of federal securities laws and (ii) all other
information concerning its business, properties and personnel as
the other party may reasonably request.
(b) No investigation by any of the parties or their
respective Representatives shall affect the representations,
warranties, covenants or agreements of any other party set forth
herein.
(c) This Section 5.7 shall not require either party or
any of its Subsidiaries to permit any access, or to disclose any
information, that in the reasonable, good faith judgment (after
consultation with counsel, which may be in-house counsel) of
such party would reasonably be expected to result in
(i) any violation of any material contract or Law to which
such party is a party or is subject or cause any privilege
(including attorney-client privilege) which such party or any of
its Subsidiaries would be entitled to assert to be undermined
with respect to such information and such undermining of such
privilege could in such partys good faith judgment (after
consultation with counsel, which may be in-house counsel)
adversely affect in any material respect such partys
position in any pending or, what such party believes in good
faith (after consultation with counsel, which may be in-house
counsel) could be, future litigation or (ii) if such party
or any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and the other party
or any of its Subsidiaries, on the other hand, are adverse
parties in a litigation, such information being reasonably
pertinent thereto; provided, that, in the cases of clause
(i), the parties hereto shall cooperate in seeking to find a way
to allow disclosure of such information to the extent doing so
(1) would not (in the good faith belief of the disclosing
party (after consultation with counsel, which may be in-house
counsel)) reasonably be likely to result in the violation of any
such material contract or Law or reasonably be likely to cause
such privilege to be undermined with respect to such information
or (2) could reasonably (in the good faith belief of the
disclosing party (after consultation with counsel which may be
in-house counsel)) be managed through the use of customary
clean-room arrangements pursuant to which
non-employee Representatives of the non-disclosing party shall
be provided access to such information; provided,
further, that the disclosing party shall (x) notify
the other party that such disclosures are reasonably likely to
violate the disclosing partys or its Subsidiaries
obligations under any such material contract or Law or are
reasonably likely to cause such privilege to be undermined,
(y) communicate to the other party in reasonable detail
(A) the facts giving rise to such notification and
(B) the subject matter of such information (to the extent
it is able to do so in accordance with the foregoing proviso)
and (z) in the case where such disclosures are reasonably
likely to violate such disclosing partys or its
Subsidiaries obligations under any material contract, use
reasonable commercial efforts to seek consent from the
applicable third party to any such material contract with
respect to the disclosures prohibited thereby (to the extent not
otherwise expressly prohibited by the terms of such contract).
A-49
(d) The information provided pursuant to Section 5.7
shall be used solely for the purpose of the Transactions
contemplated hereby, and unless and until the Mergers are
consummated, such information shall be kept confidential by the
recipient thereof in accordance with, and shall otherwise abide
by and be subject to the terms and conditions of the
Confidentiality Agreement, except that the information provided
pursuant to Section 5.7 or portions thereof may be
disclosed to affiliates directors, officers, members,
employees, agents, Financing Sources and advisors of Aristotle
or Plato (collectively, the Representatives)
who (i) need to know such information for the purpose of
the transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) shall be advised
by Aristotle or Plato, as the case may be, of this provision,
(iii) agree to hold the information provided pursuant to
Section 5.7 as confidential and (iv) agree with
Aristotle or Plato to be bound by the provisions hereof. If this
Agreement is terminated, Aristotle and Plato shall and shall
cause each of their Representatives to, return or destroy (and
certify destruction of) all information provided pursuant to
Section 5.7.
Section 5.8 Reasonable
Best Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each of Aristotle, Parent and Plato shall, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries to use reasonable best efforts (i) to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions necessary, proper or advisable to
comply promptly with all legal requirements which may be imposed
on such party or its Subsidiaries with respect to the Mergers
and, subject to the conditions set forth in Article VI
hereof, to consummate the Transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including the Mergers, as promptly as practicable and
(ii) to obtain (and to cooperate with the other party to
obtain) any consent, authorization, order or approval of, or any
exemption by, any Governmental Entity and any other third party
which is required to be obtained by Plato, Parent or Aristotle
or any of their respective Subsidiaries in connection with the
Mergers and the other Transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and to comply with the terms and conditions of any
such consent, authorization, order or approval.
(b) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each of Aristotle, Parent and Plato shall use reasonable best
efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do,
or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable
to consummate and make effective, as soon as practicable after
the date of this Agreement, the Transactions contemplated
hereby, including using reasonable best efforts to lift or
rescind any injunction or restraining order or other order
adversely affecting the ability of the parties to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby and using reasonable best
efforts to defend any litigation seeking to enjoin, prevent or
delay the consummation of the Transactions contemplated hereby
or seeking material damages.
(c) In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing,
(i) each party hereto agrees to make an appropriate filing
of a Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR Act with
respect to the Transactions as promptly as practicable and in
any event within ten (10) Business Days of the date hereof,
unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, and to supply as
promptly as practicable any additional information and
documentary material that may be requested pursuant to the HSR
Act and use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all other actions consistent with this Section 5.8
necessary to cause the expiration or termination of the
applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act (including any
extensions thereof) as soon as practicable and (ii) each of
Plato and Aristotle shall each use its reasonable best efforts
to (x) take all action reasonably necessary to ensure that
no state takeover statute or similar Law is or becomes
applicable to any of the Transactions and (y) if any state
takeover statute or similar Law becomes applicable to any of the
Transactions, take all action reasonable to enable the
Transactions to be consummated as promptly as practicable on the
terms contemplated by this Agreement and otherwise minimize the
effect of such Law on the Transactions.
(d) Each of the parties hereto shall use its reasonable
best efforts to (i) cooperate in all respects with each
other in connection with any filing or submission with a
Governmental Entity in connection with the Transactions and in
connection with any investigation or other inquiry by or before
a Governmental Entity relating to the Transactions, including
any governmental inquiry, investigation or proceeding initiated
by a private party, and (ii) keep the other party informed
in all material respects and on a reasonably timely basis of any
communication received by such party from, or given by such
party to, the Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division
of the Department of Justice or any other Governmental Entity
and of any communication received or given by a private party in
connection with any governmental inquiry, investigation or
A-50
proceeding, in each case regarding any of the Transactions.
Subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of
information, Aristotle or Parent shall have the right to direct
all matters with any Governmental Entity consistent with its
obligations hereunder; provided that each of the parties
hereto shall have the right to review in advance, and to the
extent practicable each will consult the other on, all the
information relating to the other parties and their respective
Subsidiaries, as the case may be, that appears in any filing
made with, or written materials submitted to, any third party
and/or any
Governmental Entity in connection with any governmental inquiry,
investigation or proceeding with respect to the Transactions.
Subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of
information, each party shall have the right to attend or be
promptly and fully informed following material conferences and
meetings between the other party and regulators concerning the
Transactions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
in this Agreement, Aristotle, after prior consultation with
Plato to the extent practicable, shall have the principal
responsibility for devising and implementing the strategy for
obtaining any necessary antitrust or competition clearances,
including in connection with the determination of any Regulatory
Actions, and shall take the lead in all meetings and
communications with any Governmental Entity in connection with
obtaining any necessary antitrust or competition clearances.
Aristotle and Plato may, as each deems advisable and necessary,
reasonably designate any competitively sensitive material
provided to the other under this Section 5.8(d) as
Antitrust Counsel Only Material. Such
materials and the information contained therein shall be given
only to the outside antitrust counsel of the recipient and will
not be disclosed by such outside counsel to employees, officers
or directors of the recipient unless express permission is
obtained in advance from the source of the materials (Plato or
Aristotle, as the case may be) or its legal counsel.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 5.8(d), materials provided to the other party or
its outside counsel may be redacted to remove references
concerning the valuation, pricing and other competitively
sensitive terms from an antitrust perspective in the Contracts
of Plato, Aristotle and their respective Subsidiaries.
(e) Notwithstanding Sections 5.8(a), 5.8(b) 5.8(c) and
5.8(d) or any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary,
in no event shall Aristotle or Parent or their Subsidiaries or
Affiliates be required to agree to (nor shall Plato and its
Subsidiaries be permitted to agree unless Aristotle so directs
them (and they shall, if Aristotle so directs, agree to, so long
as such agreements are conditioned upon the Closing))
(i) divest, license, hold separate or otherwise dispose of,
or allow a third party to utilize, any portion of its or their
respective businesses, assets or Contracts or (ii) take any
other action that may be required or requested by any
Governmental Entity in connection with obtaining the consents,
authorizations, orders or approvals contemplated by this
Section 5.8 that would have an adverse impact, in any
material respect, on the business of Aristotle, Parent, Plato or
their respective Subsidiaries (each a Regulatory
Action); provided, however, that,
Aristotle shall agree, consistent with the terms hereof,
conditioned on the Closing, to the extent necessary to ensure
satisfaction of the conditions set forth in
Sections 6.1(c), 6.1(e) and 6.2(d) on or prior to the
Outside Date (as the same may be extended) to (1) the
divestiture or disposition of one mail order dispensing facility
of Aristotle, Plato or any of their respective Subsidiaries,
provided it shall not be the Aristotle facility located in
St. Louis, Missouri, (2) the divestiture or
disposition of property, plant and equipment associated with
specialty pharmacy dispensing or infusion facilities of
Aristotle, Plato or any of their respective Subsidiaries having
a net book value not in excess of $30 million in the
aggregate, provided it shall not include any property, plant or
equipment at the Aristotle facility located in Indianapolis,
Indiana, (3) the divestiture, disposition, termination,
expiration, assignment, delegation, novation or transfer of
Contracts of Aristotle, Plato or their respective Subsidiaries
which generated, collectively, EBITDA not in excess of
$115 million during the most recently available twelve
(12) calendar month period ending on the applicable date of
such agreement relating to such divestiture, disposition,
termination, expiration, assignment, delegation, novation or
transfer; provided, however, with respect to this subclause (3),
in no event shall, in the case of pharmacy benefits management
customer Contracts of Aristotle, Plato or their respective
Subsidiaries, the aggregate annual number of adjusted
prescription drug claims subject to the foregoing obligation
exceed 35 million (where adjusted prescription drug
claims means (x) retail prescription drug claims,
plus the product of (y)(i) mail prescription drug claims
multiplied by (ii) three (3), such calculation to be
performed using claims made during the preceding twelve
(12) calendar month period); provided, further, as between
Aristotle and Plato, the determination of how any of the actions
specified in (1)-(3) above will be implemented shall be made by
A-51
Aristotle. For purposes of this Section 5.8,
EBITDA means EBITDA as calculated by Aristotle in a
manner consistent with the methodology utilized in the earnings
releases Aristotle has publicly filed with SEC.
Section 5.9 Indemnification.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Parent shall (and
shall cause Plato and Aristotle to) indemnify, defend and hold
harmless, to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law
(and shall advance expenses as incurred to the fullest extent
permitted under applicable law, provided the Person to whom
expenses are advanced provides an undertaking to repay such
advances if it is ultimately determined that such Person is not
entitled to be indemnified hereunder), each present and former
director and officer of Plato, Aristotle and their respective
Subsidiaries and each of their employees who serves as a
fiduciary of a Plato Benefit Plan or Aristotle Benefit Plan, as
the case may be, (in each case, when acting in such capacity)
(each, an Indemnitee and, collectively, the
Indemnitees) against any costs or expenses
(including reasonable attorneys fees), judgments,
settlements, fines, losses, claims, damages or liabilities
incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding
or investigation, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, arising out of or pertaining to matters existing
or occurring at or prior to the Effective Times, including the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Parent agrees that all rights to exculpation,
indemnification or advancement of expenses arising from,
relating to, or otherwise in respect of, acts or omissions
occurring prior to the Effective Times (including in connection
with this Agreement or the transactions or actions contemplated
hereby) now existing in favor of the current or former directors
or officers of Aristotle or Plato or any of their respective
Subsidiaries and each of their respective employees who serves
as a fiduciary of a Plato Benefit Plan or an Aristotle Benefit
Plan as provided in their respective certificates of
incorporation, by-laws or other organizational documents shall
survive the Mergers and shall continue in full force and effect
in accordance with their terms. For a period of no less than six
(6) years from the Effective Times, Parent shall cause
Aristotle and Plato to, and the Aristotle Surviving Corporation
and Plato Surviving Corporation shall, maintain in effect the
exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses
provisions of the applicable partys certificate of
incorporation and by-laws or similar organization documents in
effect as of the date of this Agreement or in any Contract of
the applicable party or its respective Subsidiaries with any of
their respective directors, officers or employees in effect as
of the date of this Agreement, and shall not amend, repeal or
otherwise modify any such provisions in any manner that would
adversely affect the rights thereunder of any individuals who
immediately before the Effective Times were current or former
directors, officers or employees of Aristotle or Plato or their
respective Subsidiaries; provided, however, that
all rights to exculpation, indemnification and advancement of
expenses in respect of any Proceeding pending or asserted or any
claim made within such period shall continue until the final
disposition of such Proceeding.
(c) In the event that either Parent or the applicable
Surviving Corporation or any of its successors or assigns
(i) consolidates with or merges into any other person and
is not the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such
consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers or conveys all or
substantially all of its properties and assets to any person,
then, and in each case, Parent shall, and shall cause the
applicable Surviving Corporation to, cause proper provision to
be made so that such successor or assign shall expressly assume
the obligations set forth in this Section 5.9.
(d) Prior to the Plato Effective Time, Plato may obtain and
fully pay for tail insurance policies with a claims
period of no more than six (6) years from and after the
Plato Effective Time from an insurance carrier with the same or
better credit rating as Platos current insurance carrier
with respect to directors and officers liability
insurance and fiduciary liability insurance with benefits and
levels of coverage not materially more favorable than
Platos existing policies with respect to matters existing
or occurring at or prior to the Plato Effective Time (including
with respect to acts and omissions occurring in connection with
this Agreement or the transactions or actions contemplated
hereby) and, if such policies have been obtained, Parent shall,
and shall cause the Plato Surviving Corporation to maintain such
policies in full force and effect after the Plato Effective
Time; provided, however, that in no event shall
Parent, Plato or Plato Surviving Corporation expend for such
tail policies a premium amount greater than the
product of the cost of the annual premium of Platos policy
in existence as of the date of this Agreement multipled by the
number of years covered by such
A-52
tail policy. Parent shall cause each of the
Aristotle Surviving Corporation and if, as of the Plato
Effective Time, Plato shall not have obtained the
tail policies described in the previous sentence,
the Plato Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, to provide
the current and former directors and officers of Plato and
Aristotle with an insurance and indemnification policy (from an
insurance carrier or insurance carriers with the same or better
credit rating as the current insurers) that provides
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary liability insurance for events, acts and omissions
occurring at or prior to the Effective Times for an aggregate
period of no less than six (6) years from the Effective
Times that is not materially less favorable than each
partys existing policy or, if such coverage is
unavailable, the best available coverage; provided,
however, that in no event shall Parent or Plato Surviving
Corporation be required to expend for such policies an annual
premium amount greater than 300% of Platos policy in
existence as of the date of this Agreement.
(e) The provisions of this Section 5.9 are
(i) intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be
enforceable by, each Indemnitee, his or her heirs and his or her
representatives and (ii) in addition to, and not in
substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or
contribution that any such individual may have under the
applicable partys certificate of incorporation and by-laws
or similar organization documents in effect as of the date of
this Agreement or in any Contract of the applicable party or its
respective Subsidiaries in effect as of the date of this
Agreement. The obligations of Parent and Plato under this
Section 5.9 shall not be terminated or modified in such a
manner as to adversely affect the rights of any Indemnitee to
whom this Section 5.9 applies unless (x) such
termination or modification is required by applicable Law or
(y) the affected Indemnitee shall have consented in writing
to such termination or modification (it being expressly agreed
that the Indemnitees to whom this Section 5.9 applies shall
be third party beneficiaries of this Section 5.9).
(f) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, shall be
construed to or shall release, waive or impair any rights to
directors and officers insurance claims under any
policy that is or has been in existence with respect to
Aristotle or Plato or any of their respective Subsidiaries for
any of their respective directors, officers or other employees,
it being understood and agreed that the indemnification provided
for in this Section 5.9 is not prior to or in substitution
for any such claims under such policies.
Section 5.10 Control
of Operations. Without limiting
Section 5.1, notwithstanding anything else in this
Agreement that may be deemed to the contrary, nothing in this
Agreement shall, directly or indirectly, give any party control
over any other partys operations, business or
decision-making before the Effective Times, and control over all
such matters shall remain in the hands of the relevant party,
subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Section 5.11 Financing.
(a) Parents, Aristotles and Merger Subs
obligations hereunder are not subject to any conditions
regarding Parents, Aristotles, Merger Subs or
any other persons ability to finance, or obtain financing
for, the Transactions; provided that the foregoing shall not
otherwise limit the provisions of Sections 6.1 or 6.2. When
otherwise obligated to consummate the Transactions in accordance
with Section 1.3, Parent, Aristotle and the Merger Subs
shall have sufficient funds available to, and shall, satisfy all
of their respective obligations under this Agreement, including
payment of any amounts required to be paid pursuant to
Article II and all fees and expenses incurred in connection
herewith.
(b) Unless, and to the extent, Aristotle, Parent or the
Merger Subs have sufficient cash from other sources (including
by reason of a capital market or other financing transaction)
available to satisfy their obligations under this Agreement,
from and after the execution of this Agreement, Aristotle,
Parent and the Merger Subs shall use their respective reasonable
best efforts to arrange the Financing on the terms and
conditions described in the Commitment Letter and shall not
permit any amendment or modification to be made to, any
replacement of all or any portion of any facilities (or
commitments thereof) described in, or any waiver of any
provision or remedy under, the Commitment Letter, if such
amendment, modification, replacement or waiver (i) reduces
the aggregate amount of the Financing (including by changing the
amount of fees to be paid or original issue discount except by
operation of the market flex provisions) or
(ii) imposes new or additional conditions or otherwise
expands, amends or modifies any of the conditions to the receipt
of any portion of the Financing in a manner that would or would
reasonably be expected to (A) delay or prevent the Closing
or the
A-53
Closing Date or (B) make the funding of the Financing (or
satisfaction of the conditions to obtaining the Financing)
materially less likely to occur or (C) adversely impact the
ability of Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs, as applicable,
to enforce their rights against other parties to the Commitment
Letter or the Definitive Agreements, in any material respect,
including any right to seek specific performance of the
Commitment Letter or the Definitive Agreements. Subject to the
limitations set out in the first sentence of this
Section 5.11(b), Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs may
amend, supplement, modify or replace the Commitment Letter as in
effect at the date hereof (x) to add or replace lenders,
lead arrangers, bookrunners, syndication agents or similar
entities who had not executed the Commitment Letter as of the
date of this Agreement, (y) to increase the amount of
indebtedness and (z) to replace all or a portion of the
facility committed under the Commitment Letter as in effect as
of the date hereof with one or more new facilities under such
Commitment Letter or under any new commitment letter or facility
(any such new commitment or facility, a Replacement
Facility) in a manner not materially less beneficial
to Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs (as determined in the
reasonable judgment of Aristotle), provided that any amendments,
modifications or replacements of any Replacement Facility shall
be subject to the same limitations that apply to the Commitment
Letter as set forth in the first sentence of this
Section 5.11(b). For purposes of this Agreement,
(1) the term Financing shall be deemed
to include the financing contemplated by the Commitment Letter
as permitted to be amended, modified or replaced pursuant to
this Section 5.11 (including any Replacement Facility, any
Alternative Financing and, in the case of Section 5.11(f),
any offering of debt or equity securities the proceeds of which
are intended to be used to satisfy the obligations under this
Agreement), and (2) the term Commitment
Letter shall be deemed to include the Commitment
Letter as may be permitted to be amended, modified or replaced
pursuant to this Section 5.11, any Replacement Facility,
and any commitment letters with respect to the Alternative
Financing and any related fee letters (it being understood that
any Replacement Facility or Alternative Financing shall be
subject to the terms herein that apply to Commitment Letter.
(c) Unless, and to the extent, Aristotle, Parent or the
Merger Subs have sufficient cash from other sources (including
by reason of a capital market or other financing transaction)
available to satisfy their obligations under this Agreement,
each of Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs shall use their
reasonable best efforts to (i) maintain in effect the
Commitment Letter pursuant to its terms (except for amendments
not prohibited by Section 5.11(b)) until the Transactions
are consummated, (ii) negotiate and enter into definitive
agreements with respect to the Financing on the terms and
conditions (including any applicable market flex
provisions) contained in the Commitment Letter
(Definitive Agreements) or on other terms not
materially less favorable to Aristotle, Parent and the Merger
Subs, in the aggregate, than the terms and conditions (including
any applicable market flex provisions) contained in
the Commitment Letter, (iii) satisfy on a timely basis (or
obtain the waiver of) all conditions to funding in the
Commitment Letter that are within its control and consummate the
Financing at or prior to the Closing in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Commitment Letter at or prior to the
Closing, (iv) subject to Section 8.12, enforce their
rights under the Commitment Letter in the event of a breach or
other failure to fund the Financing required to consummate the
Transactions on the Closing Date by the lenders and other
Persons providing Financing, and (v) comply in all material
respects with its covenants and other obligations under the
Commitment Letter (or obtain the waiver thereof).
(d) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs shall give Plato
reasonably prompt notice: (i) of any material breach or
default by any party to the Commitment Letter or definitive
document related to the Financing of which they become aware;
(ii) of the receipt of any written notice or other written
communication from any Financing Source with respect to any
breach, default, termination or repudiation by any party to the
Commitment Letter or any definitive document related to the
Financing of any provisions of the Commitment Letter or any
definitive document related to the Financing and (iii) if
for any reason Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs believe in
good faith that they will not be able to obtain all or any
portion of the Financing required to consummate the
Transactions. Aristotle, Parent and Merger Subs shall use their
reasonable best efforts to complete the Financing to the extent
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby on
the Closing Date.
A-54
(e) Unless, and to the extent, Aristotle, Parent or the
Merger Subs have sufficient cash from other sources (including
by reason of a capital market or other financing transaction)
available to satisfy their obligations under this Agreement, in
the event any portion of the Financing becomes unavailable on
the terms and conditions contemplated in the Commitment Letter,
Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs shall use their respective
reasonable best efforts to, as promptly as practicable, arrange
alternative debt financing from the same or alternative sources
in an amount sufficient to consummate the Transactions,
including the Mergers (the Alternative
Financing) following the occurrence of such event;
provided however, that Aristotle shall not be
required to obtain financing which includes terms and conditions
materially less favorable (taking into account any market
flex provision) to Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs,
in each case relative to those in the Financing being replaced.
Aristotle shall promptly notify Plato of the receipt of any
written notice from any lender named in the Commitment Letter to
withdraw, terminate or reduce the aggregate amount of Financing
contemplated by, the Commitment Letter. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, no provision of this Section 5.11(e) or any
other provision of this Agreement shall release Parent,
Aristotle, or the Merger Subsidiaries from their obligations
pursuant to Sections 5.11(a).
(f) Plato shall, shall cause its Subsidiaries to, and shall
use reasonable best efforts to cause its and their
Representatives to provide, on a timely basis, all reasonable
cooperation requested by Aristotle in connection with
(X) the arrangement of Financing to be incurred in
connection with the Transactions and (Y) Refinancing
Transactions, including, in the case of both (X) and (Y),
(i) promptly providing the Financing Sources
and/or
Refinancing Sources and their respective agents with all
financial information regarding Plato and its Subsidiaries
required to be delivered pursuant to Sections 2 and 3 of
Exhibit B of the Commitment Letter or other information as
may be reasonably requested by Aristotle, the Financing Sources
or Refinancing Sources or their respective agents to prepare
customary bank information memoranda, lender presentations,
offering memoranda, private placement memoranda (including under
Rule 144A under the Securities Act), registration
statements and prospectuses under the Securities Act in
connection with such Financing
and/or
Refinancing Transaction; (ii) participating (including by
making members of senior management with appropriate seniority
and expertise available to participate) in a reasonable number
of meetings, due diligence sessions, presentations, road
shows, drafting sessions and sessions with the rating
agencies in connection with the Financing and Refinancing
Transactions; (iii) reasonably cooperating with the
Financing Sources
and/or
Refinancing Sources and their respective agents due
diligence, to the extent not unreasonably interfering with the
business of Plato, including access to documentation reasonably
requested by persons in connection with capital markets
transactions; (iv) reasonably cooperating with the
marketing efforts for any portion of the Financing and
Refinancing Transactions, including using its reasonable best
efforts to ensure that any syndication effort benefits from any
existing banking relationship; (v) reasonably cooperating
with Aristotles preparation of bank information memoranda,
prospectuses and similar documents, rating agency presentations,
road show presentations and written offering materials used to
complete such Financing or Refinancing Transaction, to the
extent information contained therein relates to the business of
Plato and its Subsidiaries; (vi) using reasonable best
efforts to cause its certified independent auditors to provide
(A) consent to SEC filings and offering memoranda that
include or incorporate Platos consolidated financial
information (with such changes as Plato and its auditors deem
necessary or appropriate) and their reports thereon, in each
case, to the extent such consent is required, auditors reports
and comfort letters with respect to financial information
relating to Plato and its Subsidiaries in customary form and
(B) other documentation (including reasonable assistance in
the preparation of pro forma financial statements by Parent
and/or
Aristotle, to the extent such other documentation is required);
provided that it is understood that assumptions underlying the
pro forma adjustments to be made are the responsibility of
Parent
and/or
Aristotle; (vii) providing customary certificates, legal
opinions of internal counsel or other customary closing
documents as may be reasonably requested by Parent
and/or
Aristotle or their respective Financing Sources or Refinancing
Sources (viii) entering into one or more credit or other
agreements on terms satisfactory to Aristotle in connection with
the Financing immediately prior to (but not effective until) the
Effective Times; (ix) taking all actions reasonably
necessary in connection with the pay off of existing
indebtedness of Plato and its Subsidiaries on the Closing Date
and the release of related Liens on the Closing Date (including
any necessary prepayment of Platos existing indebtedness),
in each case of clauses (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x),
conditional upon the actual occurrence of the Closing; and
(x) executing and delivering any pledge and security
documents or other definitive financing
A-55
documents reasonably requested by Parent
and/or
Aristotle or their respective Financing Sources; provided,
however, that no obligation of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries
under any such agreement or instrument shall be effective until
the Effective Time and, none of Plato or any of its Subsidiaries
shall be responsible for any cost, commitment or other similar
fee or incur any other liability in connection with the
Financing or any Refinancing Transaction prior to the Effective
Time. All non-public or other confidential information provided
by Plato or any of its Representatives pursuant to this
Section 5.11 shall be kept confidential in accordance with
the Confidentiality Agreement, except that Aristotle and Parent
shall be permitted to disclose such information to potential
financing sources and to rating agencies during the syndication
and marketing of the Financing or Refinancing Transactions
subject to customary confidentiality undertakings by such
potential financing sources. Aristotle and Parent shall promptly
indemnify and hold harmless Plato, its Subsidiaries and their
respective Representatives from and against any and all
liabilities, losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses, interest,
awards, judgments and penalties suffered or incurred by any of
them in connection with the claims asserted by Financing Sources
or Refinancing Sources in connection with the arrangement of the
Financing or Refinancing Transactions and any information used
in connection therewith (other than information relating to
Plato or its Subsidiaries provided to Aristotle in writing on or
behalf of Plato, its Subsidiaries or its and their
Representatives expressly for use in connection with the
Financing or Refinancing Transactions); the foregoing
indemnification shall survive termination of this Agreement. For
purposes of Section 6.2(b), but not Section 7.2, the
obligations of Plato as set forth in the foregoing
Section 5.11(f)(vi)(A) shall be deemed to exclude the
phrase using reasonable best efforts.
Section 5.12 Employee
Benefit Plans.
(a) For a period beginning at the Plato Effective Time and
continuing through December 31, 2012, Aristotle shall
provide, or shall cause Parent to provide, (i) to each
employee of Plato and its Subsidiaries (each such employee, a
Covered Employee), base salary, target bonus
opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities (including
the 2012 bonuses paid and long-term incentives granted in
2013) that are, in each case, no less than the base salary,
target bonus opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities
(other than opportunities under an employee stock purchase plan)
applicable to each such Covered Employee immediately prior to
the Plato Effective Time and (ii) employee benefits (other
than severance benefits and benefits under an employee stock
purchase plan) that are no less favorable, in the aggregate,
than the employee benefits provided to Covered Employees
immediately prior to the Plato Effective Time. For a period
beginning at the Plato Effective Time and continuing through the
first anniversary thereof, Aristotle shall, or shall cause
Parent to, provide severance benefits to each Covered Employee
that are equal to the severance benefits provided to Covered
Employees under Plato Benefit Plans immediately prior to the
Plato Effective Time.
(b) Following the Effective Times, Parent shall, or shall
cause Aristotle and its Affiliates and any successors thereto
to, assume, honor, fulfill and discharge Platos and its
Subsidiaries obligations under the agreements listed on
Schedule 5.12(b) of the Plato Disclosure Letter as set
forth thereon.
(c) As of the Effective Times, Parent shall cause its and
Aristotles and Platos third party insurance
providers or third party administrators to waive all limitations
as to any pre-existing condition or waiting periods in its
applicable welfare plans with respect to participation and
coverage requirements applicable to the Covered Employees under
any welfare plans that such employees may be eligible to
participate in after the Effective Times, other than limitations
or waiting periods that are already in effect with respect to
such employees and that have not been satisfied as of the
Effective Times under any comparable employee benefit plan. In
addition, while giving effect to Section 5.12(a) and
5.12(b), as of the Effective Times, the Covered Employees shall
be eligible to participate in the Aristotle Employee Stock
Purchase Plan on the same terms and conditions as similarly
situated employees of Parent, Aristotle and their respective
Affiliates, and Parent shall, and shall cause Aristotle and
Plato to, give Covered Employees full credit for purposes of
eligibility, vesting and level of benefits (including for
purposes of paid-time off, severance and short-term disability
benefits, but not for benefit accrual purposes under any defined
benefit pension plan) under any employee benefit and
compensation plans or arrangements maintained by Parent or any
of its Affiliates for such Covered Employees service with
Aristotle, Plato or any of their respective Affiliates to the
same extent that such service was credited for purposes of any
comparable employee benefit plan immediately prior to the
Effective
A-56
Times and in no event shall service prior to the Effective Times
be required to be taken into account if such service credit
would result in the duplication of benefits with respect to the
same period.
(d) Plato shall be permitted to (1) finally and
conclusively determine, in good faith, the amounts earned, based
on maximum funding, under the Plato Annual Incentive Plan and
Plato Executive Annual Incentive Plan (collectively, the
Bonus Plans) in respect of the 2011 fiscal
year, and pay such bonus amounts in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, but no later than the
Closing Date and (2) upon notice to and in consultation
with Aristotle, establish annual bonus targets, maximums and
performance award levels, performance measures and eligibility
and participation requirements for the 2012 fiscal year under
the Bonus Plans, in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice. If the Closing Date occurs on or after
January 1, 2012, upon notice to and in consultation with
Aristotle, (x) Plato shall be permitted to fully
fund 2012 incentive pools under the Bonus Plans based on
the most recent forecast available at that time, pro rata for
the portion of the year (based on calendar days) elapsed between
January 1, 2012 and the Closing Date and (y) pay out
such 2012 bonus amounts to eligible employees upon the Closing
Date. For the balance of the 2012 calendar year following the
Closing Date, Parent shall, or shall cause Aristotle or its
Affiliates to, provide bonus opportunities under a new program,
based on the eligibility and participation requirements in
effect under the Bonus Plans immediately prior to the Plato
Effective Time, based on performance metrics and funding to be
determined by Parent.
(e) Parent hereby acknowledges that a change in
control, change of control or term of similar
import within the meaning of each Plato Benefit Plan will occur
upon the Plato Effective Time.
(f) At Aristotles request, Plato shall provide
periodic updates with respect to the negotiation, execution,
adoption, amendment or termination of any collective bargaining
Contract.
(g) No provision of this Section 5.12 shall be
construed as a limitation on the right of Parent, or to cause
Aristotle, Plato and their respective Affiliates to, amend or
terminate any specific Plato Benefit Plan or Aristotle Benefit
Plan that Plato or Aristotle would otherwise have under the
terms of such Plato Benefit Plan or Aristotle Benefit Plan, or
shall any provision of this Section 5.12 be construed to
require the continuation of the employment of any particular
Covered Employee. The provisions of this Section 5.12 are
solely for the benefit of the parties to this Agreement, and no
current or former director, officer, employee or independent
contractor or any other person shall be a third-party
beneficiary of this Section 5.12 of this Agreement, and
nothing herein shall be construed as an amendment to any Plato
Benefit Plan or Aristotle Benefit Plan or other compensation or
benefit plan or arrangement for any purpose.
Section 5.13 Additional
Agreements. In case at any time after the
Effective Times any further action is necessary or desirable to
carry out the purposes of this Agreement or to vest Parent with
full title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals,
immunities and franchises of any of the parties to the Mergers,
the proper officers and directors of each party to this
Agreement and their respective Subsidiaries shall take all such
necessary action as may be reasonably requested by, and at the
sole expense of, Aristotle.
Section 5.14 Stock
Exchange Listing. Parent and Aristotle shall
use their reasonable efforts to cause the shares of Parent
Common Stock to be issued in connection with the Mergers and
shares of Parent Common Stock to be reserved upon exercise of
options to purchase Parent Common Stock to be listed on NASDAQ,
subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the respective
Effective Times.
Section 5.15 Section 16
Matters. Prior to the Effective Times,
Aristotle and Plato shall take all such steps as may be required
to cause any dispositions of Aristotle Common Stock or Plato
Common Stock (including derivative securities with respect to
Aristotle Common Stock or Plato Common Stock) or acquisitions of
Parent Common Stock (including derivative securities with
respect to Parent Common Stock) resulting from the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement by each individual who is subject
to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act with respect to Aristotle and Plato or will become
subject to such reporting requirements with respect to Parent,
to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act.
A-57
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS
TO THE MERGER
Section 6.1 Conditions
to Obligations of Each Party. The obligations
of Aristotle, Aristotle Merger Sub and Parent to consummate the
Aristotle Merger and of Plato, Plato Merger Sub and Parent to
consummate the Plato Merger are subject to the satisfaction, at
or prior to the Closing, of the following conditions (which may
be waived, in whole or in part, to the extent permitted by Law,
by Aristotle or Parent, as the case may be, on behalf of itself
and its Subsidiaries, and Plato):
(a) Stockholder Approval. Plato
shall have obtained the Plato Stockholder Approval, and
Aristotle shall have obtained the Aristotle Stockholder Approval.
(b) NASDAQ Listing. The shares of
Parent Common Stock issuable to Plato and Aristotles
stockholders pursuant to this Agreement shall have been approved
for listing on the NASDAQ, subject to official notice of
issuance.
(c) Statutes and Injunctions. No
Order shall have been promulgated, entered, enforced, enacted or
issued or shall be applicable to the Mergers or other
Transactions by any Governmental Entity which prohibits,
restrains or makes illegal the consummation of the Mergers or
other Transactions and shall continue in effect.
(d) Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall
not be the subject of any stop order.
(e) Governmental
Consents. (i) The waiting period (and
any extensions thereof) under the HSR Act applicable to the
Mergers shall have expired or been terminated, any approval from
Governmental Entities set forth on Schedule 6.1(e)(i) shall
have been obtained and shall be in effect, or, with respect to
waiting periods, shall have expired or been terminated, and
(ii) all material filings with any Governmental Entity set
forth on Schedule 6.1(e)(ii) required for the consummation
of the Mergers and the other Transactions contemplated hereby
shall have been made (collectively, the matters addressed in
clauses (i) and (ii), the Required Governmental
Consents). This condition shall be deemed to be
satisfied, insofar as the items set forth on
Schedule 6.1(e)(i) and Schedule 6.1(e)(ii) are
concerned, if not earlier satisfied, on the fifth (5th) Business
Day prior to the Outside Date (without giving effect to any
extension thereof); provided, that, nothing in the foregoing
shall limit any of the other conditions set forth in this
Article VI.
Section 6.2 Conditions
to Obligations of Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs to
Effect the Aristotle Merger. The obligations
of Aristotle, Parent and Aristotle Merger Sub to consummate the
Aristotle Merger and of Parent and Plato Merger Sub to
consummate the Plato Merger are subject to the satisfaction on
or prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions (which
may be waived in whole or in part by Aristotle or Parent, as the
case may be, on behalf of itself and such other entities):
(a) The representations and warranties of Plato set forth
in this Agreement (except those representations and warranties
set forth in the proviso below) shall be true and correct in all
respects (without giving effect to any materiality or Plato
Material Adverse Effect qualifier therein), as of the date of
this Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though made on or
as of such date (or, in the case of representations and
warranties that address matters only as of a particular date, as
of such date), except to the extent that breaches thereof,
individually or in the aggregate, have not had, and would not
reasonably be expected to have a Plato Material Adverse Effect;
provided, that the representations and warranties of
Plato set forth in the (A) first sentence of
Section 3.1 (but, with respect to Platos
Subsidiaries, solely with respect to those Subsidiaries which
are material to the business of Plato and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole), (B) Section 3.2(a),
(C) Section 3.3, (D) Section 3.4(b)(i),
(E) Section 3.6(b) and (F) Section 3.21
shall be true and correct in all respects (except, with respect
to Section 3.2(a), to the extent that such inaccuracies
would be immaterial, in the aggregate) as of the date of this
Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though made on or as of
such date (or, in the case of representations and warranties
that address matters only as of a particular date, as of such
date). Aristotle, Parent and the
A-58
Merger Subs shall have received a certificate validly executed
and signed on behalf of Plato by its chief executive officer and
chief financial officer certifying that this condition has been
satisfied.
(b) Plato shall have performed or complied with all of the
obligations, agreements and covenants (other than those set
forth in Section 5.6) required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by it in all material respects and
Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs shall have received a
certificate validly executed and signed on behalf of Plato by
its chief executive officer and chief financial officer
certifying that this condition has been satisfied.
(c) Parent shall have received the opinion of Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, counsel to Parent, in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Parent, on the
basis of certain facts, representations and assumptions set
forth in such opinion, dated the Closing Date to the effect that
the receipt by the holders of the shares of Aristotle Common
Stock of Parent Common Stock in exchange for Aristotle Common
Stock pursuant to the Aristotle Merger, taken together with the
receipt by the holders of the shares of Plato Common Stock of
the Parent Common Stock in exchange for Plato Common Stock
pursuant to the Plato Merger will qualify for federal income tax
purposes as an exchange within the meaning of
Section 351 of the Code. In rendering such opinion, such
counsel shall be entitled to receive and rely upon
representations of officers of Aristotle, Parent, Plato and the
Merger Subs as to such matters as such counsel may reasonably
request.
(d) There shall be (i) no Proceeding pending in a
United States District Court commenced by a Governmental Entity
seeking an Order that would prohibit, restrain or make illegal
the consummation of the Mergers or the other Transactions under
the U.S. antitrust laws, (ii) no motion of a
Governmental Entity pending in a United States Court of Appeals,
seeking on an expedited basis, appeal, review, rehearing or
reconsideration (each, an Expedited Appeal)
of the matters set forth in clause (i) that has been
granted by such United States Court of Appeals, (iii) no
request or petition for an Expedited Appeal that has been made
or filed by any Governmental Entity and (iv) all deadlines
for the making or filing of any such request or petition that
may be specified by any statute, regulation, court order or
guideline shall have passed without any request or petition for
such Expedited Appeal having been made or filed by such
Governmental Entity, except, in the case of (iii) and (iv),
to the extent any such request or petition shall have been
subsequently denied; provided, that, from and after the fifth
(5th) Business Day preceding the Outside Date (as the same may
be extended), clauses (iii) and (iv) shall cease to be
effective for any purpose, including for purposes of this
Article VI and Article VII.
Section 6.3 Conditions
to Obligations of Plato to Effect the Plato
Merger. The obligation of Plato to consummate
the Plato Merger is subject to the satisfaction on or prior to
the Closing Date of the following conditions (which may be
waived in whole or in part by Plato):
(a) The representations and warranties of Aristotle, Parent
and the Merger Subs set forth in this Agreement (except those
representations and warranties set forth in the proviso below)
shall be true and correct in all respects (without giving effect
to any materiality or Aristotle Material Adverse Effect
qualifier therein), as of the date of this Agreement and as of
the Closing Date as though made on or as of such date (or, in
the case of representations and warranties that address matters
only as of a particular date, as of such date), except to the
extent that breaches thereof, individually or in the aggregate,
have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have an
Aristotle Material Adverse Effect; provided, that the
representations and warranties of Aristotle set forth in
(A) the first sentences of Section 4.1 (but, with
respect to Aristotles Subsidiaries, solely with respect to
those Subsidiaries which are material to the business of
Aristotle and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole),
(B) Section 4.3(a), (C) Section 4.4,
(D) Section 4.5(b)(i), (E) Section 4.7(b)
and (F) Section 4.22 shall be true and correct in all
respects (except, with respect to Section 4.3(a), to the
extent that such inaccuracies would be immaterial, in the
aggregate) as of the date of this Agreement and as of the
Closing Date as though made on or as of such date (or, in the
case of representations and warranties that address matters only
as of a particular date, as of such date). Plato shall have
received a certificate validly executed and signed on behalf of
Aristotle by its chief executive officer and chief financial
officer certifying that this condition has been satisfied.
A-59
(b) Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs shall have
performed or complied with, as applicable, all of the
obligations, agreements and covenants (other than those set
forth in Section 5.6) required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by each of them in all material
respects and Plato shall have received a certificate validly
executed and signed on behalf of Aristotle by its chief
executive officer and chief financial officer certifying that
this condition has been satisfied.
(c) Plato shall have received the opinion of
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, counsel to Plato, in form and
substance reasonably satisfactory to Plato, on the basis of
certain facts, representations and assumptions set forth in such
opinion, dated the Closing Date to the effect that the receipt
by the holders of the shares of Plato Common Stock of Parent
Common Stock in exchange for Plato Common Stock pursuant to the
Plato Merger, taken together with the receipt by the holders of
the shares of Aristotle Common Stock of Parent Common Stock in
exchange for Aristotle Common Stock pursuant to the Aristotle
Merger, will qualify for federal income tax purposes as an
exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of
the Code. In rendering such opinion, such counsel shall be
entitled to receive and rely upon representations of officers of
Aristotle, Parent, Plato and the Merger Subs as to such matters
as such counsel may reasonably request.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
Section 7.1 Termination. Anything
herein or elsewhere to the contrary notwithstanding, this
Agreement may be terminated and the Mergers contemplated herein
may be abandoned at any time prior to the Plato Effective Time,
whether before or after the Plato Stockholder Approval
and/or the
Aristotle Stockholder Approval:
(a) By the mutual written consent of Aristotle and Plato.
(b) By either of Plato or Aristotle:
(i) if any Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction
shall have issued an Order permanently restraining, enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the Transactions and such Order shall have
become final and non-appealable;
(ii) if the Transactions shall not have been consummated by
April 20, 2012 (the Outside Date);
provided, however, that if the conditions set
forth in Section 6.1(c), Section 6.1(e) or
Section 6.2(d) shall not have been satisfied or duly waived
by all parties entitled to the benefit of such condition by the
fifth (5th) Business Day prior to April 20, 2012, either
Aristotle or Plato may, by written notice delivered to the other
party, extend the Outside Date from time to time to a date not
later than July 20, 2012, and if the conditions set forth
in Section 6.1(c), Section 6.1(e) or
Section 6.2(d) have not been satisfied or duly waived by
all parties entitled to the benefit of such condition by the
fifth (5th) Business Day prior to such date, either Aristotle or
Plato may, by written notice delivered to the other, extend the
Outside Date from time to time to a date not later than
October 22, 2012; provided, further, that the
right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1(b)(ii) shall not be available to Plato or
Aristotle if its action or failure to act constitutes a material
breach or violation of any of its covenants, agreements or other
obligations hereunder and such material breach or violation has
been the principal cause of or directly resulted in (1) the
failure to satisfy the conditions to the obligations of the
terminating party to consummate the Merger set forth in
Article VI prior to the Outside Date (as the same may be
extended) or (2) the failure of the Closing to occur by the
Outside Date (as the same may be extended);
(iii) if the Aristotle Stockholder Approval shall not have
been obtained upon a vote taken thereon at the Aristotle
Stockholders Meeting duly convened therefor or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof; or
A-60
(iv) if the Plato Stockholder Approval shall not have been
obtained upon a vote taken thereon at the Plato Stockholders
Meeting duly convened therefor or at any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
(c) By Plato:
(i) if (A) the Aristotle Board or any committee makes,
prior to the Aristotle Stockholders Meeting, an Aristotle
Adverse Recommendation Change, (B) the Aristotle Board or
any committee thereof shall have failed to include the Aristotle
Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement distributed to
stockholders, (C) a tender offer or exchange offer is
commenced and the Aristotle Board shall have failed to recommend
against acceptance of such tender offer or exchange offer by its
stockholders (including, for these purposes, by taking any
position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2
of the Exchange Act other than recommending rejection of such
tender offer or exchange offer) within ten (10) Business
Days of the commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer,
(D) the Aristotle Board or any committee thereof shall have
refused to affirm publicly the Aristotle Recommendation
following any reasonable written request by Plato to provide
such reaffirmation (including in the event of a Takeover
Proposal (other than pursuant to a commenced tender offer or
exchange offer) having been publicly disclosed) prior to the
earlier of (x) ten (10) calendar days following such
request and (y) five (5) Business Days prior to the
Aristotle Stockholder Meeting (provided, in the case of clause
(y), that if such request is made less than eight
(8) Business Days prior to such meeting, then,
notwithstanding the foregoing, the Aristotle Board or any
committee thereof shall have four (4) Business Days to
respond to such request for reaffirmation), it being further
agreed that no such request for such affirmation shall be made
unless there are events or developments that in the reasonable
judgment of Plato call into question whether the Aristotle
Stockholder Approval will be obtained or (E) the Aristotle
Board formally resolves to take or publicly announces an
intention to take any of the foregoing actions; provided,
that the right to terminate pursuant to foregoing
clauses (A) through (E) which arises following the
commencement or announcement of a Takeover Proposal shall expire
if not exercised prior to the tenth (10th) Business Day
following the date on which the right to terminate under this
Section 7.1(c)(i) first arose; provided,
further, that the foregoing proviso shall not apply for
purposes of Section 7.3;
(ii) prior to the receipt of the Aristotle Stockholder
Approval, if Aristotle shall be in Willful Breach of its
obligations pursuant to the first three sentences of
Section 5.3(c) or Section 5.4;
(iii) if Aristotle shall have breached or failed to perform
any of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
set forth in this Agreement, which breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a condition set forth
in Sections 6.3(a) or 6.3(b) and (ii) is incapable of
being cured by Aristotle by the Outside Date (as the same may be
extended); or
(iv) prior to the receipt of the Plato Stockholder
Approval, so that Plato may enter into a definitive agreement
providing for a Superior Proposal.
(d) By Aristotle:
(i) if (A) the Plato Board or any committee makes,
prior to the Plato Stockholders Meeting, a Plato Adverse
Recommendation Change, (B) the Plato Board or any committee
thereof shall have failed to include the Plato Recommendation in
the Joint Proxy Statement distributed to stockholders,
(C) a tender offer or exchange offer is commenced and the
Plato Board shall have failed to recommend against acceptance of
such tender offer or exchange offer by its stockholders
(including, for these purposes, by taking any position
contemplated by
Rule 14e-2
of the Exchange Act other than recommending rejection of such
tender offer or exchange offer) within ten (10) Business
Days of the commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer,
(D) the Plato Board or any committee thereof shall have
refused to affirm publicly the Plato Recommendation following
any reasonable written request by Aristotle to provide such
reaffirmation (including in the event of a Takeover Proposal
(other than pursuant to a commenced tender offer or exchange
offer) having been publicly disclosed) prior to the earlier of
(x) ten (10) calendar days following such request and
(y) five
A-61
(5) Business Days prior to the Plato Stockholder Meeting
(provided, in the case of clause (y), that if such request is
made less than eight (8) Business Days prior to such
meeting, then, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plato Board or
any committee thereof shall have four (4) Business Days to
respond to such request for reaffirmation), it being further
agreed that no such request for such affirmation shall be made
unless there are events or developments that in the reasonable
judgment of Aristotle calls into question whether the Plato
Stockholder Approval will be obtained or (E) the Plato
Board formally resolves to take or publicly announces an
intention to take any of the foregoing actions; provided,
that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to foregoing
clauses (A) through (E) which arises following the
commencement or announcement of a Takeover Proposal shall expire
if not exercised prior to the tenth (10th) Business Day
following the date on which a right to terminate under this
Section 7.1(d)(i) first arose; provided,
further, that the foregoing proviso shall not apply for
purposes of Section 7.3.
(ii) prior to the receipt of the Plato Stockholder
Approval, if Plato shall be in Willful Breach of its obligations
pursuant to the first three sentences of Sections 5.3(b);
or Section 5.4; or
(iii) if Plato shall have breached or failed to perform any
of its representations, warranties, covenants or agreements set
forth in this Agreement, which breach or failure to perform
(i) would give rise to the failure of a condition set forth
in Sections 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) and (ii) is incapable of
being cured by Plato by the Outside Date (as the same may be
extended); or
(iv) prior to the receipt of the Aristotle Stockholder
Approval, so that Aristotle may enter into a definitive
agreement providing for a Superior Proposal.
Section 7.2 Effect
of Termination. In the event of the
termination of this Agreement by either Aristotle or Plato as
provided in Section 7.1, written notice thereof shall
forthwith be given by the terminating Party to the other Party
specifying the provision hereof pursuant to which such
termination is made. In the event of the termination of this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, this Agreement shall be
terminated and this Agreement shall forthwith become void and
have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the part
of Aristotle, Parent, the Merger Subs or Plato, other than this
Section 7.2, Section 7.3 and Article VIII, which
provisions shall survive such termination; provided,
however, that nothing in this Section 7.2 shall
relieve any party from liability for any fraud, Willful Breach
of a representation or warranty or Willful Breach of any
covenant or other agreement contained in this Agreement. No
termination of this Agreement shall affect the obligations of
the parties contained in the Confidentiality Agreement, all of
which obligations shall survive the termination of this
Agreement in accordance with their terms.
Section 7.3 Termination
Fee; Expenses.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Sections 7.3
and except for (i) the filing fee under the HSR Act and any
fees for similar filings or notices under foreign laws or
regulations, (ii) the expenses in connection with printing
and mailing the Joint Proxy Statement required in connection
with the actions specified in Section 5.3(a) and the
Form S-4,
(iii) all SEC filing fees relating to the Transactions
contemplated herein (which fees and expenses shall be borne, in
each case, equally by Aristotle and Plato), all fees and
expenses incurred by the parties hereto shall be borne solely by
the party that has incurred such fees and expenses.
(b) In the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Section 7.1(b)(iii), then Aristotle shall pay to Plato
on the date of such termination, all documented, out of pocket
expenses (including financing expenses) not to exceed
$225,000,000, in the aggregate (Plato
Expenses), payable by wire transfer of same day funds.
(c) In the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant
to Section 7.1(b)(iv), then Plato shall pay to Aristotle on
the date of such termination, all documented, out of pocket
expenses (including financing expenses) not to exceed
$225,000,000, in the aggregate (Aristotle
Expenses), payable by wire transfer of same day funds.
(d) In the event that (A) this Agreement is, or, at
the time of a termination of this Agreement, could have been,
terminated pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(ii) or
Section 7.1(b)(iii), and (B) a Takeover Proposal
(substituting
A-62
40% for 15% in the definition of
Takeover Proposal) for Aristotle (whether or not
modified after it was first made) is publicly disclosed,
announced or otherwise made public (in each case, other than by
Plato) (1) in the case of Section 7.1(b)(ii), prior to
the date of termination and the vote seeking the Aristotle
Stockholder Approval at the Aristotle Stockholder Meeting had
not been taken prior to the seventh (7th) Business Day prior to
the Outside Date (as the same may be extended) and (2) in
the case of Section 7.1(b)(iii), prior to the date of the
Aristotle Stockholder Meeting, then Aristotle shall pay to
Plato, on the date of termination, 35% of the Termination Fee
plus the Plato Expenses (for purposes of this
Section 7.3(d), not to exceed $100,000,000) payable by wire
transfer of same day funds, on the date of such termination, and
(C) if, within one (1) year following such
termination, Aristotle enters into a definitive agreement
providing for, or otherwise consummates, a Takeover Proposal
(substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of Takeover Proposal), then Aristotle
shall pay to Plato the Termination Fee less any amount of the
Termination Fee and any Plato Expenses previously paid, by wire
transfer of same day funds, upon the earlier of the public
announcement of Aristotles entry into any such agreement
or the consummation of any such transaction. In the event such a
Takeover Proposal (substituting 40% for 15% in the definition of
Takeover Proposal) is consummated prior to the
termination of this Agreement, then Aristotle shall promptly pay
to Plato the Termination Fee.
(e) In the event that (A) this Agreement is, or, at
the time of a termination of this Agreement, could have been,
terminated pursuant to Section 7.1(b)(ii) or
Section 7.1(b)(iv) and (B) a Takeover Proposal
(substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of Takeover Proposal) for Plato (whether
or not modified after it was first made) is publicly disclosed,
announced or otherwise made public (in each case, other than by
Aristotle) (1) in the case of Section 7.1(b)(ii),
prior to the date of termination and the vote seeking the Plato
Stockholder Approval at the Plato Stockholder Meeting had not
been taken prior to the seventh (7th) Business Day prior to the
Outside Date (as the same may be extended) and (2) in the
case of Section 7.1(b)(iv), prior to the date of the Plato
Stockholder Meeting, then Plato shall pay to Aristotle on the
date of termination, 35% of the Termination Fee plus the
Aristotle Expenses (for purposes of this Section 7.3(e),
not to exceed $100,000,000), payable by wire transfer of same
day funds, on the date of such termination, and (C) if,
within one (1) year following such termination, Plato
enters into a definitive agreement providing for, or otherwise
consummates, a Takeover Proposal (substituting 40%
for 15% in the definition of Takeover
Proposal), then Plato shall pay to Aristotle the
Termination Fee less any amount of the Termination Fee and any
Aristotle Expenses previously paid, by wire transfer of same day
funds, by wire transfer of same day funds, upon the earlier of
the public announcement of Platos entry into any such
agreement or the consummation of any such transaction. In the
event such a Takeover Proposal (substituting 40% for 15% in the
definition of Takeover Proposal) is consummated
prior to the termination of this Agreement, then Plato shall
promptly pay to Aristotle the Termination Fee.
(f) In the event this Agreement is, or, at the time of a
termination of this Agreement, could have been, terminated by
Plato pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(i) or Aristotle pursuant
to Section 7.1(d)(i), then the terminating party (or the
party which could have terminated pursuant to
Sections 7.1(c)(i) or 7.1(d)(i)) shall be paid by the other
party, on the date of termination, the Termination Fee, payable
by wire transfer of same day funds.
(g) In the event this Agreement (i) in the case of
Plato, is, or could have been, terminated by Plato pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(ii) on the date of termination, Aristotle
shall pay Plato on the date of termination, the Termination Fee,
payable by wire transfer of same day funds or (ii) in the
case of Aristotle, is, or could have been, terminated by
Aristotle pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(ii) on the date of
termination, then Plato shall pay Aristotle on the date of
termination, the Termination Fee, payable by wire transfer of
same day funds.
(h) In the event this Agreement is terminated by Plato
pursuant to Section 7.1(c)(iv) or Aristotle pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(iv), then the terminating party shall pay
the other party, on the date of termination, the Termination
Fee, payable by wire transfer of same day funds.
(i) The parties acknowledge that the agreements contained
in this Section 7.3 are an integral part of the
Transactions contemplated by this Agreement and that, without
these agreements, the parties would not enter into this
Agreement. The payments contemplated hereby shall be paid
pursuant to this Section 7.3 regardless of any alleged
breach by the payee of its obligations hereunder,
provided, that no payment made by either
A-63
party pursuant to this Section 7.3 shall operate or be
construed as a waiver by the party of any breach of this
Agreement by the other party or of any rights of the party in
respect thereof. The Termination Fee, if paid, shall be credited
against any damages recovered by the payee arising from a breach
of this Agreement by the payor. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in this Agreement, in no event (i) shall Aristotle
Expenses or Plato Expenses, as the case may be, or the full
amount of the Termination Fee be paid more than once or
(ii) shall anyone be paid an aggregate amount pursuant to
Section 7.3(a) through (h) in excess of the full
amount of the Termination Fee.
(j) Each party agrees that notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary (other than with respect to claims
for, or arising out of or in connection with, fraud or Willful
Breaches of any representation, warranty, covenant or other
agreement, as provided in Section 7.2), (A) in the
event that any Termination Fee is paid to a party in accordance
with this Section 7.3, the payment of such Termination Fee
shall be the sole and exclusive remedy of such party, its
Subsidiaries, stockholders, Affiliates, officers, directors,
employees and Representatives against the other party or any of
its Representatives or Affiliates for, (B) in no event will
the party being paid any Termination Fee or any other such
person seek to recover any other money damages or seek any other
remedy based on a claim in law or equity with respect to,
(1) any loss suffered, directly or indirectly, as a result
of the failure of the Mergers to be consummated, (2) the
termination of this Agreement, (3) any liabilities or
obligations arising under this Agreement, or (4) any claims
or actions arising out of or relating to any breach, termination
or failure of or under this Agreement, and (C) upon payment
of any Termination Fee in accordance with this Section 7.3,
no party nor any Affiliates or Representatives of any party
shall have any further liability or obligation to the other
party relating to or arising out of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 7.4 Procedure
for Termination or Amendment. A termination
of this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1 or an amendment
or waiver of this Agreement pursuant to Sections 8.1 or 8.2
shall, in order to be effective, require, in the case of Plato,
Aristotle, Parent and the Merger Subs, action by their
respective Boards of Directors or a duly authorized committee
thereof. Termination of this Agreement prior to the Effective
Times shall not require the approval of the stockholders or
either Plato or Aristotle.
ARTICLE VIII
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 8.1 Amendment
and Modification. Subject to applicable Law,
this Agreement may be amended, modified and supplemented in any
and all respects, whether before or after any vote of the
stockholders of Plato or Aristotle contemplated hereby, by
written agreement of the parties hereto at any time prior to the
Closing Date with respect to any of the terms contained herein;
provided, however, that no amendment, modification
or supplement of this Agreement shall be made following the
adoption of this Agreement by the Aristotle or Plato
stockholders unless, to the extent required, approved by the
stockholders; and provided further that no amendment,
modification or supplement shall be made to this Agreement that
would adversely affect the rights of the Financing Sources as
set forth in Sections 7.3(j), 8.6, 8.12(b) and 8.13 without
the consent of the Financing Sources.
Section 8.2 Extension;
Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective
Times, the parties may (a) extend the time for the
performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other
parties, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations
and warranties contained in this Agreement or in any document
delivered pursuant to this Agreement or (c) subject to the
proviso of Section 8.1, waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained in this Agreement. Except as
required by applicable Law, no waiver of this Agreement shall
require the approval of the stockholders of either Aristotle or
Plato. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such
extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an
instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party. The
failure of any party to this Agreement to assert any of its
rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a
waiver of such rights, nor shall any single or partial exercise
by any party to this Agreement of any of its rights under this
Agreement preclude any other or further exercise of such rights
or any other rights under this Agreement.
A-64
Section 8.3 Nonsurvival
of Representations and Warranties. None of
the representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any
schedule, instrument or other document delivered pursuant to
this Agreement shall survive the Effective Times.
Section 8.4 Notices. All
notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing
and shall be deemed given if delivered personally, facsimile
transmission (which is confirmed) or sent by an overnight
courier service, such as Federal Express, to the parties at the
following addresses (or at such other address for a party as
shall be specified by like notice):
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
if to Aristotle, Parent or the Merger Subs, to:
|
Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
St. Louis, MO 63121
Attention: Keith J. Ebling, Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Telephone No:
(314) 996-0900
Facsimile:
(866) 230-8345
with a copy to:
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
4 Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Attention: Lou R. Kling
Howard
L. Ellin
Kenneth
M. Wolff
Telephone No.:
(212) 735-3000
Facsimile:
(212) 735-2000
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
Attention: Thomas M. Moriarty, General Counsel, Secretary and
President,
Global Pharmaceutical Strategies
Telephone No:
(201) 269-3400
Facsimile:
(201) 269-1109
with a copy to:
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Attention: James C. Morphy
Matthew
G. Hurd
Telephone No.:
(212) 558-4000
Facsimile:
(212) 558-3588
Section 8.5 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of
which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall
become effective when two or more counterparts have been signed
by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties
(including by facsimile or via portable document format (.pdf)),
it being understood that all parties need not sign the same
counterpart.
Section 8.6 Entire
Agreement; Third Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement (including the Exhibits hereto and the documents and
the instruments referred to herein), the Confidentiality
Agreement and any agreements entered into contemporaneously
herewith: (a) constitutes the entire agreement and
supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both written
and oral, among the parties with respect to the subject
A-65
matter hereof (although any provisions of the Confidentiality
Agreement conflicting with this Agreement shall be governed by
this Agreement), and (b) except for (i) as provided in
Section 5.9 and (ii) solely with respect to the
Financing Sources, Sections 7.3(j), 8.12(b) and 8.13, are
not intended to confer upon any Person other than the parties
hereto any rights or remedies. Notwithstanding clause (b)
of the immediately preceding sentence, following the Plato
Effective Time the provisions of Article II are enforceable
by stockholders of Plato to the extent necessary to receive the
consideration to which such holder is entitled pursuant to
Article II. Section 5.9 is intended for the benefit
of, and shall be enforceable by, the Indemnified Parties.
Sections 7.3(j), 8.12(b) and 8.13 are intended for the
benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, the Financing Sources.
The Letter Agreement between Aristotle and Plato, dated
July 5, 2011, and all obligations thereunder (other than
the restrictions set forth therein with respect to acquisition
of the beneficial ownership of securities of a party thereto and
the provisions relating to the termination of restrictions set
forth therein, all of which shall continue in effect) shall
abate and be of no effect unless and until this Agreement has
been terminated in accordance with its terms (such period, the
Abatement Period), in which event, the terms
of such Letter Agreement shall only apply with respect to
actions taken from and after such termination; provided, that,
notwithstanding the foregoing, any proposal, including a
Takeover Proposal, tender offer or exchange offer that was made
during the Abatement Period by any party hereto shall
automatically be withdrawn at the conclusion of the Abatement
Period unless the other party hereto otherwise consents.
Section 8.7 Severability. If
any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Agreement
is held by a court of competent jurisdiction or other authority
to be invalid, void, unenforceable or against its regulatory
policy, the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and
restrictions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated
so long as the economic and legal substance of the transactions
contemplated hereby, taken as a whole, are not affected in a
manner materially adverse to any party hereto.
Section 8.8 Specific
Performance. The parties agree that
irreparable damage would occur if any provision of this
Agreement were not performed in accordance with the terms hereof
(and, more specifically, that irreparable damage would likewise
occur if the Mergers were not consummated and the affected
partys stockholders did not receive the aggregate Merger
Consideration payable to them in accordance with the terms but
subject to the conditions of this Agreement), and, accordingly,
that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce
specifically the performance of the terms and provisions hereof
(including the obligation of Aristotle, Parent and the Merger
Subs to consummate the Mergers, the obligation of Plato to
consummate the Plato Merger and the obligation of Aristotle,
Parent and Merger Subs to pay, and the affected partys
stockholders right to receive, the aggregate Merger
Consideration payable to them pursuant to the Mergers, subject
in each case to the terms and conditions of this Agreement) in
the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any court of
the United States located in the State of Delaware, in addition
to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in
equity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge
and agree that in no event shall Aristotle be required to
litigate against its Financing Sources; provided,
however, that the parties further acknowledge and agree
that this provision and the agreements set forth in
subsections (b) through (e) of Section 5.11 shall
not be interpreted or applied in such a way as to eliminate or
otherwise mitigate the obligations of Parent, Aristotle or the
Merger Subs to satisfy their respective obligations to fund the
Transactions.
Section 8.9 Assignment. Neither
this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto
(whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior
written consent of the other parties, except that each of the
Merger Subs may assign, in its sole discretion, any or all of
its rights, interests and obligations hereunder to any entity
that is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by Aristotle;
provided, that, no such assignment shall be permitted hereunder
if such assignment would reasonably be expected to
(i) materially prevent or delay the consummation of the
Transactions or (ii) result in any of the conditions to the
Mergers set forth in Article VI not being satisfied. This
Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and
assigns.
Section 8.10 Headings;
Interpretation. The descriptive headings used
herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and are
not intended to be part of or to affect the meaning or
interpretation of this
A-66
Agreement. Include, includes, and
including shall be deemed to be followed by
without limitation whether or not they are in fact
followed by such words or words of like import. The words
hereof, herein and hereunder
and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall
refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement. References to this
Agreement shall include the Aristotle Disclosure Letter
and the Plato Disclosure Letter. The word will shall
be construed to have the same meaning and effect as the word
shall. The words made available,
delivered or provided or terms of
similar import, when used in the representations (including any
attendant definitions) shall mean, in the case of Aristotle,
made available to Aristotle and its representatives prior to the
date of this Agreement in the MerrillCorp DataSite under the
title Project Prometheus or delivered to Aristotle
and, in the case of Plato, made available to Plato and its
representatives prior to the date of this Agreement in the
Intralinks DataSite under the title Project
Prometheus or delivered to Plato. All terms defined in
this Agreement shall have the defined meanings when used in any
certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant hereto
unless otherwise defined therein. All Exhibits and Schedules
annexed hereto or referred to herein, and the Plato Disclosure
Letter and the Aristotle Disclosure Letter, are hereby
incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement as if set
forth in full herein; provided, however, that the
fact that any item of information is disclosed in either the
Plato Disclosure Letter or the Aristotle Disclosure Letter to
this Agreement shall not be construed to mean that such
information is required to be disclosed by this Agreement. The
definitions contained in this Agreement are applicable to the
singular as well as the plural forms of such terms and to the
masculine as well as to the feminine and neuter genders of such
term. Any Contract, instrument or Law defined or referred to
herein means such Contract, instrument or Law as from time to
time amended, modified or supplemented, including (in the case
of Contracts or instruments) by waiver or consent and (in the
case of Laws) by succession of comparable successor Laws and
references to all attachments thereto and instruments
incorporated therein. References to a person are also to its
permitted successors and assigns. This Agreement is the product
of negotiations by the parties having the assistance of counsel
and other advisers. It is the intention of the parties that this
Agreement not be construed more strictly with regard to one
party than with regard to the others.
Section 8.11 Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware
without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of law
thereof or of any other jurisdiction.
Section 8.12 Enforcement;
Exclusive Jurisdiction.
(a) The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur
and that the parties would not have any adequate remedy at law
in the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were
not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties
shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms
and provisions of this Agreement in the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware or any court of the United States located in
the State of Delaware without proof of actual damages or
otherwise (and each party hereby waives any requirement for the
securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy),
this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are
entitled at law or in equity. In addition, each of the parties
hereto (a) consents to submit itself, and hereby submits
itself, to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery of
the State of Delaware and any court of the United States located
in the State of Delaware, in the event any dispute arises out of
this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, (b) agrees that it will not attempt to deny or
defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for
leave from any such court, and agrees not to plead or claim any
objection to the laying of venue in any such court or that any
judicial proceeding in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum, (c) agrees that it will not bring any
action relating to this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than the Court
of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if under applicable law
exclusive jurisdiction is vested in the Federal courts, any
court of the United States located in the State of Delaware and
(d) consents to service of process being made through the
notice procedures set forth in Section 8.4.
(b) Notwithstanding anything contrary in this Agreement,
each of the parties hereto agrees that it will not bring or
support any action, cause of action, claim, cross-claim or
third-party claim of any kind or description,
A-67
whether in law or in equity, whether in contract or in tort or
otherwise, against the Financing Sources in any way relating to
this Agreement or any of the Transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including but not limited to any dispute arising out
of or relating in any way to the Commitment Letter or the
performance thereof, in any forum other than the Supreme Court
of the State of New York, County of New York, or, if under
applicable law exclusive jurisdiction is vested in the Federal
courts, the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (and appellate courts thereof). The parties
hereto further agree that all of the provisions of
Section 8.13 relating to waiver of jury trial shall apply
to any action, cause of action, claim, cross-claim or third
party-claim referenced in this Section 8.12(b).
Section 8.13 WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO (ON
BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES) HEREBY KNOWINGLY,
INTENTIONALLY AND VOLUNTARILY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL
RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF
OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED
HEREBY.
Section 8.14 Joint
Obligations. Any covenant, agreement or
obligation of Aristotle hereunder shall be deemed to be and
shall constitute a covenant, agreement and obligation of and by
Parent to cause Aristotle and the Merger Subs to perform and
discharge such covenant, agreement or obligation. Any covenant,
agreement or obligation of Parent hereunder shall be deemed to
be and shall constitute a covenant, agreement and obligation of
and by Aristotle to cause Parent and the Merger Subs to perform
and discharge such covenant, agreement or obligation. Aristotle
and Parent shall be jointly and severally liable for the failure
by either of them to perform and discharge any of their
respective covenants, agreements or obligations hereunder.
Section 8.15 Definitions.
(a) As used in this Agreement, the following terms and
those set forth in the Index of Defined Terms, when used in this
Agreement, and the Exhibits, Schedules, and other documents
delivered in connection herewith, shall have the meanings
specified in this Section 8.14 or on the corresponding page
number of the Index of Defined Terms:
An Affiliate of any Person means
another Person that directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such first Person. control has the
meaning specified in Rule 405 under the Securities Act.
Applicable SAP means statutory
accounting principles applicable to the Plato Insurance Company
Subsidiaries or the Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiaries, as
the case may be.
Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary
means each of Express Scripts Insurance Company, a Subsidiary of
Aristotle which is an insurance company domiciled in Arizona and
Express Reinsurance Company, a Subsidiary of Aristotle which is
an insurance company domiciled in Missouri.
Aristotle Material Intellectual
Property means any Intellectual Property the
unavailability of which would be materially detrimental to
Aristotle and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Aristotle Subsidiary Insurance
Agreements means (a) all of the insurance
agreements written by an Insurance Company Subsidiary reflected
in the Aristotle Disclosure Letter, (b) all other insurance
agreements written by Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary on
the same forms as those insurance contracts or policy forms
reflected in the Aristotle Disclosure Letter written by an
Aristotle Insurance Company Subsidiary between the date of this
Agreement and the Closing Date, and (c) renewals thereof
and individual certificates issued thereunder and all
supplements, endorsements, enhancement letters, riders and
ancillary agreements in connection therewith.
Business Day means a day except a
Saturday, a Sunday or other day on which the SEC or commercial
banks in the County of New York are authorized or required by
Law to be closed.
A-68
Confidentiality Agreement means the
confidentiality agreement dated June 14, 2011 between Plato
and Aristotle, as amended by that Letter Agreement, dated
July 5, 2011, and as the same may be further amended,
supplemented or otherwise modified by the parties.
Environmental Claim means any claim,
action, cause of action, suit, proceeding, investigation, order,
demand or notice (written or oral) by any Person or entity
alleging actual or potential liability (including, without
limitation, actual or potential liability for investigatory
costs, cleanup costs, governmental response costs, natural
resources damages, property damages, personal injuries,
attorneys fees or penalties) arising out of, based on,
resulting from or relating to the presence, or Release into the
environment, of, or exposure to, any Materials of Environmental
Concern at any location, now or in the past but shall not
include any claims relating to products liability.
Environmental Laws means all federal,
state, local and foreign laws, regulations, ordinances,
requirements of governmental authorities, and common law
relating to pollution, exposure to Materials of Environmental
Concern, or to the protection of the environment (including,
without limitation, ambient air, surface water, ground water,
land surface or subsurface strata, and natural resources),
including, without limitation, laws and regulations relating to
(i) emissions, discharges, releases or threatened releases
of, or exposure to, Materials of Environmental Concern,
(ii) the manufacture, processing, distribution, use,
treatment, generation, storage, containment (whether above
ground or underground), disposal, transport or handling of
Materials of Environmental Concern, (iii) recordkeeping,
notification, disclosure and reporting requirements regarding
Materials of Environmental Concern, (iv) endangered or
threatened species of fish, wildlife and plant and the
management or use of natural resources, or (v) the
preservation of the environment or mitigation of adverse effects
on the environment but shall not include any claims relating to
products liability.
Financing Sources means the entities
that have committed to provide or otherwise entered into
agreements in connection with the financing or other financings
in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby,
together with their affiliates, and including the parties to the
Commitment Letter and any joinder agreements or credit
agreements (including the definitive agreements relating
thereto).
GAAP means generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States.
Intellectual Property means all
intellectual property rights, including patent and the invention
and discoveries therein; processes, formulae, know-how and other
trade secrets or proprietary confidential information;
copyrights and copyrightable works (including copyrights in
software, databases, applications, code, systems, networks,
website content, documentation and related items); trademarks,
service marks, trade names, logos, trade dress and other source
indicators, and the goodwill of the business appurtenant
thereto; and Internet domain names.
Joint Proxy Statement means a proxy
statement relating to the adoption and approval of this
Agreement by Platos stockholders and by Aristotles
stockholders.
Knowledge and
known means the actual knowledge,
including such knowledge as would have resulted from reasonable
inquiry, of the executive officers of Plato or Aristotle, as the
case may be.
Laws means, any United States,
federal, state or local or any foreign law (in each case,
statutory, common or otherwise), constitution, treaty,
convention, ordinance, code, rule, statute, regulation (domestic
or foreign) or other similar requirement enacted, issued,
adopted, promulgated, entered into or applied by a Governmental
Entity.
Marketing Period means the first
period of 20 consecutive calendar days after the date of this
Agreement throughout which the conditions set forth in
Sections 6.1 and 6.2 have been satisfied (except for any
conditions that by their nature can only be satisfied on the
Closing Date, but subject to the satisfaction of such conditions
or waiver by the party entitled to waive such conditions) and
nothing has occurred and no state of facts exists that would
cause any of the conditions set forth in Sections 6.1 and
6.2 to fail to be satisfied assuming the Closing were to be
scheduled for any time during such 20 calendar day period;
provided that if the Marketing Period has not been completed
(i) prior to December 19, 2011,
A-69
the Marketing Period shall commence no earlier than
January 3, 2012, (ii) prior to August 20, 2012,
the Marketing Period shall commence no earlier than
September 3, 2012 and (iii) prior to December 24,
2012, the Marketing Period shall commence no earlier than
January 2, 2013; provided, further, that November
23-27, 2011
and November
21-25 , 2012
shall not be considered calendar days for purposes of the
definition of Marketing Period but a period
including such days shall be considered a consecutive period for
purposes of the definition of Marketing Period;
provided, further, that, whether or not commenced, in no event
shall the Marketing Period extend beyond the fourth Business Day
prior to the Outside Date, as it may be extended pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(ii).
Material Adverse Effect means, with
respect to Plato, on the one hand, or Aristotle, on the other
hand, any event, change, effect, development, state of facts,
condition, circumstances or occurrence (including any
development arising after the date of this Agreement in any
Proceeding) that, individually or in the aggregate, has or would
be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the
business, results of operations, assets, liabilities or
financial condition of such party and its Subsidiaries, taken as
a whole, except to the extent such material adverse effect
results from (A) any changes in general United States or
global economic conditions, except in the event that such
changes in conditions have greater adverse materially
disproportionate effect on such party and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, relative to the adverse effect such changes
have on others operating in the industries in which such party
and any of its Subsidiaries operate, (B) any changes in
conditions generally affecting any of the industries in which
such party and its Subsidiaries operate, except in the event
that such changes in conditions have a greater adverse
materially disproportionate effect on such party and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the adverse effect
such changes have on others operating in such industries,
(C) any decline in the market price or trading volume of
the common stock of such party (it being understood that the
facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such
decline may be taken into account in determining whether there
has been or would be a Material Adverse Effect), (D) any
regulatory, legislative or political conditions or securities,
credit, financial or other capital markets conditions, in each
case in the United States or any foreign jurisdiction, except in
the event that such conditions have a greater adverse materially
disproportionate effect on such party and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, relative to the adverse effect such changes
have on others operating in the industries in which such party
and any of its Subsidiaries operate, (E) any failure, in
and of itself, by such party to meet any internal or published
projections, forecasts, estimates or predictions in respect of
revenues, earnings or other financial or operating metrics for
any period (it being understood that the facts or occurrences
giving rise to or contributing to such failure may be taken into
account in determining whether there has been or would be a
Material Adverse Effect), (F) the execution and delivery of
this Agreement or the public announcement or pendency of the
Mergers or any of the other Transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including the impact thereof on the relationships,
contractual or otherwise, of such party or any of its
Subsidiaries with customers, suppliers or partners, other than
for purposes of Sections 3.4, 4.5, 6.2(a) (insofar as it
relates to Section 3.4) and 6.3(a) (insofar as it relates
to Section 4.5), (G) any change in applicable law,
regulation or GAAP (or authoritative interpretations thereof),
(H) any geopolitical conditions, the outbreak or escalation
of hostilities, any acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any
escalation or worsening of any such acts of war, sabotage or
terrorism threatened or underway as of the date of this
Agreement, except in the event that such conditions or events
have a greater adverse materially disproportionate effect on
such party and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
the adverse effect such changes have on others operating in the
industries in which such party and any of its Subsidiaries
operate or (I) any action required to be taken pursuant to
or in accordance with this Agreement or taken at the request of
the other party.
Materials of Environmental Concern
means chemicals, pollutants, contaminants, wastes, toxic or
hazardous substances, materials or wastes, petroleum and
petroleum products, greenhouse gases, asbestos or
asbestos-containing materials or products, polychlorinated
biphenyls, lead or lead-based paints or materials, radon,
fungus, mold, mycotoxins or other substances regulated due to a
potential adverse effect on human health or the environment.
NASDAQ means The NASDAQ Stock Market.
A-70
Order means any order, writ,
injunction, decree, judgment, award, injunction, settlement or
stipulation issued, promulgated, made, rendered or entered into
by or with any Governmental Entity (in each case, whether
temporary, preliminary or permanent.
Permitted Lien means (i) any
Liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or which are being
contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and with
respect to which adequate reserves have been taken,
(ii) carriers, warehousemens, mechanics,
materialmens, repairmens or other similar liens,
(iii) pledges or deposits in connection with workers
compensation, unemployment insurance and other social security
legislation, (iv) gaps in the chain of title evident from
the records of the relevant Government Entity maintaining such
records, easements,
rights-of-way,
covenants, restrictions and other encumbrances of record as of
the date hereof, (v) easements,
rights-of-way,
covenants, restrictions and other encumbrances incurred in the
ordinary course of business that, in the aggregate, are not
material in amount and that do not, in any case, materially
detract from the value or the use of the property subject
thereto, (vi) statutory landlords liens and liens
granted to landlords under any lease, (vii) any purchase
money security interests, equipment leases or similar financing
arrangements, and (viii) any Liens securing obligations
under $250,000.
Person means any individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company,
association, trust or other entity or organization, including a
government or political subdivision or an agency or
instrumentality thereof.
Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary
means each of Medco Containment Life Insurance Company, a
Subsidiary of Plato which is an insurance company domiciled in
Pennsylvania, and Medco Containment Insurance Company of New
York, a Subsidiary of Plato domiciled in New York.
Plato Material Intellectual Property
means any Intellectual Property the unavailability of which
would be materially detrimental to Plato and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole.
Plato Subsidiary Insurance Agreements
means (a) all of the insurance agreements written by a
Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary reflected in the Plato
Disclosure Letter, (b) all other insurance agreements
written by Plato Insurance Company Subsidiary on the same forms
as those insurance contracts or policy forms reflected in the
Plato Disclosure Letter written by a Plato Insurance Company
Subsidiary between the date of this Agreement and the Closing
Date, and (c) renewals thereof and individual certificates
issued thereunder and all supplements, endorsements, enhancement
letters, riders and ancillary agreements in connection therewith.
Proceeding means any suit, action,
proceeding, arbitration, mediation, audit, hearing, inquiry or,
to the Knowledge of the Person in question, investigation (in
each case, whether civil, criminal, administrative,
investigative, formal or informal) commenced, brought, conducted
or heard by or before, or otherwise involving, any Governmental
Entity.
Refinancing Sources means any entities
that have committed to provide or otherwise entered into
agreements in connection with any Refinancing Transactions.
Refinancing Transaction means any
financing effected in connection with refinancing existing
indebtedness of Aristotle (including accrued but unpaid
interest, penalties and fees) upon its stated maturity,
acceleration or mandatory redemption.
Release means disposing, discharging,
injecting, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, leaching,
dumping, emitting, escaping or emptying into or upon the indoor
or outdoor environmental including without limitations any soil,
sediment, subsurface strata, surface water, groundwater, ambient
air, the atmosphere or any other media.
Subsidiary when used with respect to
any party means any corporation, partnership or other
organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated,
(i) of which at least a majority of the securities or other
interests having by their terms voting power to elect a majority
of the board of directors or others performing similar functions
with respect to such corporation or other organization is
directly or indirectly beneficially owned or controlled by such
party or by any one or more of its Subsidiaries, or by such
party
A-71
and one or more of its Subsidiaries, or (ii) that would be
required to be consolidated in such partys financial
statements under generally accepted accounting principles as
adopted (whether or not yet effective) in the United States. For
all purposes of this Agreement, Parent shall be deemed a
Subsidiary of Aristotle.
Tax Return shall mean any return,
report or statement required to be filed with any governmental
authority with respect to Taxes.
Taxes shall mean all taxes of any
kind, including those on or measured by or referred to as
income, gross receipts, sales, use, ad valorem, excise,
employment, withholding, franchise, profits, license, value
added, property or windfall profits taxes, customs, duties or
similar fees, assessments or charges of any kind whatsoever,
together with any interest and any penalties, additions to tax
or additional amounts imposed by any governmental authority,
domestic or foreign.
Termination Fee means an amount equal
to $950,000,000.
Willful Breach means (i) with
respect to any breach of a representation or warranty contained
in this Agreement, a material breach of such representation or
warranty that has been made with the Knowledge of the breaching
party, (ii) with respect to any breaches or failures to
perform any of the covenants or other agreements contained in
this Agreement, a material breach, or failure to perform, that
is a consequence of an act or omission undertaken by the
breaching party with the Knowledge that the taking of, or
failure to take, such act would, or would be reasonably expected
to, cause a material breach of this Agreement and (iii) the
failure by any party to consummate the Transactions after all of
the conditions set forth in Article VI have been satisfied
or waived (by the party entitled to waive any such applicable
conditions).
A-72
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Aristotle, Parent, Plato, Aristotle Merger
Sub and Plato Merger Sub have duly executed this Agreement, all
as of the date first written above.
MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ David
B. Snow, Jr.
|
Name: David B. Snow, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
Name: Jeff Hall
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
ARISTOTLE HOLDING, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
ARISTOTLE MERGER SUB, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
PLATO MERGER SUB, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
A-73
EXECUTION
VERSION
AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated November 7, 2011
(Amendment No. 1) to that certain Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) dated as of
July 20, 2011 by and among Express Scripts, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Express Scripts), Medco Health
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Medco),
Aristotle Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Express Scripts (New Express Scripts),
Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts (Aristotle
Merger Sub) and Plato Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts
(Plato Merger Sub). Capitalized terms used by not
defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Merger
Agreement.
WHEREAS, the parties have entered in to a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) as of November 7, 2011, to
document the agreement in principle for the settlement with
plaintiffs in various stockholder actions of such actions
brought in connection with the Merger Agreement on the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend certain of the provisions
of the Merger Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of each of Express Scripts,
Medco, New Express Scripts, Aristotle Merger Sub and Plato
Merger Sub have each determined that it is advisable and in the
best interests of their respective companies and stockholders to
enter into this Amendment No. 1 and authorized their
respective companies to enter into this Amendment
No. 1; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 8.1 of the Merger
Agreement, the Merger Agreement may only be amended by written
agreement of (a) Express Scripts, (b) Medco,
(c) New Express Scripts, (d) Aristotle Merger Sub and
(e) Plato Merger Sub.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises of this
Amendment No. 1 and the agreements set forth herein and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the parties hereby agree as follows:
|
|
1. |
Amendment to Section 5.4(b). Section 5.4(b) of
the Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated by adding
the following proviso at the end of the last sentence of
Section 5.4(b):
|
; provided, further, that each of Plato and
Aristotle, as the case may be, will be entitled to the benefit
of clauses (iii) and (iv) above, and any extension
which may apply pursuant to the immediately preceding proviso,
no more than one time with respect to a Takeover Proposal and
any material amendments or modifications thereof.
|
|
2. |
Amendment to Section 8.15. Section 8.15 of the
Merger Agreement is hereby amended and restated by deleting the
current definition of Termination Fee and replacing
it in its entirety with the following:
|
Termination Fee means an amount equal to
$650,000,000; provided, that, in the event that
(A) a Termination Fee is payable pursuant to
Section 7.3(f) and (B) at the time of the event giving
rise to Aristotles or Platos right to terminate the
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(i) or
Section 7.1(c)(i), as the case may be, and be paid such a
Termination Fee, as the case may be, there was no Takeover
Proposal outstanding with respect to the party obligated to pay
such Termination Fee, the Termination Fee shall mean an amount
equal to $950,000,000.
|
|
3. |
No Other Changes. Except as expressly provided herein,
the Merger Agreement is not amended, modified or otherwise
affected by this Amendment No. 1, and the Merger Agreement
and the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder are
hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.
|
|
|
4. |
Effective Time. This Amendment No. 1 shall be
effective as of the date set forth in the preamble to this
Amendment No. 1.
|
A-74
|
|
5. |
Governing Law. This Amendment No. 1 will be governed
by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the
conflicts of law principles thereof.
|
|
|
6. |
Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed
in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered
one and the same agreement and shall become effective when two
or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties (including by facsimile or via
portable document format (.pdf)), it being understood that all
parties need not sign the same counterpart.
|
[SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]
A-75
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Express Scripts, Medco, New Express Scripts,
Aristotle Merger Sub and Plato Merger Sub have duly executed
this Amendment No. 1, all as of the date first written
above.
Very truly yours,
MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
M. Moriarty
|
Name: Thomas M. Moriarty
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
General Counsel, Secretary and President, Global Pharmaceutical
Strategies
|
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
ARISTOTLE HOLDING, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
ARISTOTLE MERGER SUB, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
PLATO MERGER SUB, INC.
Name: Keith Ebling
[Signature
Page to Amendment No. 1]
Annex B
July 20, 2011
The Board of Directors
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the Company Common Stock), of
Medco Health Solutions, Inc., (the Company) of the
consideration to be paid to such holders in the Transaction (as
defined below). We understand that pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, to be dated as of July 20, 2011 (the
Agreement), among Express Scripts, Inc. (the
Merger Partner), the Company, Aristotle Holding,
Inc. (the Parent), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Merger Partner, Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc. (Aristotle
Merger Sub), a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the
Merger Partner and Plato Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned
indirect subsidiary of the Merger Partner (Plato Merger
Sub, and together with the Merger Partner, the Parent and
Aristotle Merger Sub, collectively, the Merger Partner
Group), among other things, the following will occur:
|
|
|
|
|
Aristotle Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Merger
Partner, with the Merger Partner resulting as the surviving
entity in the merger (the Aristotle Merger) and
becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Parent, and each
outstanding share of common stock, $0.01 par value per
share, of Merger Partner (Merger Partner Common
Stock), other than shares of Merger Partner Common Stock
held in treasury or owned by the Parent and its affiliates, will
be converted into the right to receive one share of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Parent (Parent
Common Stock); and
|
|
|
|
immediately following the consummation of the Aristotle Merger,
Plato Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, with
the Company resulting as the surviving entity (the Plato
Merger, and together with the Aristotle Merger, the
Transaction) and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Parent, and each outstanding share of Company Common
Stock, other than shares of Company Common Stock held in
treasury or owned by the Company, Plato Merger Sub or any
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and the Appraisal
Shares (as defined in the Agreement), but including (a) the
Company Common Stock held in a Plato Benefit Plan (as defined in
the Agreement) or related trust, (b) the Plato Book-Entry
Shares (as defined in the Agreement) and (c) the Company
Common Stock purchased using contributions under the Plato
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as defined in the Agreement)
pursuant to Section 2.9 of the Agreement, will be converted
into the right to receive consideration per share equal to
$28.80 in cash (the Cash Consideration) and
0.810 shares (the Stock Consideration, and,
together with the Cash Consideration, the
Consideration) of Parent Common Stock.
|
In connection with preparing our opinion, we have
(i) reviewed a draft dated July 19, 2011 of the
Agreement; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available
business and financial information concerning the Company and
the Merger Partner and the industries in which they operate;
(iii) compared the proposed financial terms of the
Transaction with the publicly available financial terms of
certain transactions involving companies we deemed relevant and
the consideration paid for such companies; (iv) compared
the financial and operating performance of the Company and the
Merger Partner with publicly available information concerning
certain other companies we deemed relevant and reviewed the
current and historical market prices of the Company Common Stock
and of the Merger Partner Common Stock and certain publicly
traded securities of such other companies;
(v) reviewed certain internal financial analyses and
forecasts prepared by or at the direction of the
managements of the Company and the Merger Partner relating to
their respective businesses (with internal financial analyses
and forecasts with respect to the Merger Partner from 2015
through 2021 being provided by the Companys management
based on guidance provided by Merger Partners management),
as well as the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings
and related expenses and synergies expected to result from the
Transaction (the Synergies); and (vi) performed
such other financial studies and analyses and considered such
other information as we deemed appropriate for the purposes of
this opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Company and the Merger Partner with
respect to certain aspects of the Transaction, and the past and
current business operations of the Company and the Merger
Partner, the financial condition and future prospects and
operations of the Company, the Merger Partner and the Parent,
the effects of the Transaction on the financial condition and
future prospects of the Company, the Merger Partner and the
Parent, and certain other matters we believed necessary or
appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with us by the
Company and the Merger Partner or otherwise reviewed by or for
us, and we have not independently verified (nor have we assumed
responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any
such information or its accuracy or completeness. We have not
conducted or been provided with any valuation or appraisal of
any assets or liabilities, nor have we evaluated the solvency,
of the Company or the Merger Partner or the Parent under any
state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or
similar matters. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to us or derived therefrom, including the Synergies, we
have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared based on
assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments by management as to the expected future results of
operations and financial condition of the Company, the Merger
Partner and Parent to which such analyses or forecasts relate.
We express no view as to such analyses or forecasts (including
the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based, and
we have assumed, with your approval, that the Synergies will be
achieved at the times and in amounts projected in all respects
material to our analysis. We have also assumed that the
Transaction and the other transactions contemplated by the
Agreement will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for United
States federal income tax purposes, and will be consummated as
described in the Agreement, and that the definitive Agreement
will not differ in any material respects from the draft thereof
furnished to us. We have also assumed that the representations
and warranties made by the Company and the Merger Partner Group
in the Agreement and the related agreements are and will be true
and correct in all respects material to our analysis. We also
note that we were not authorized to and did not solicit any
expressions of interest from any other parties with respect to
the sale of all or any part of the Company or any other
alternative transaction. We are not legal, regulatory or tax
experts and have relied on the assessments made by the Company
and its advisors with respect to such issues. We have further
assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other
consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the
Transaction will be obtained without any adverse effect on the
Company, the Merger Partner or the Parent or on the contemplated
benefits of the Transaction.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Consideration to be paid to the
holders of the Company Common Stock in the Transaction, and we
express no opinion as to the fairness of the Transaction to, or
any consideration paid in connection therewith by, the holders
of any other class of securities, creditors or other
constituencies of the Company or as to the underlying decision
by the Company to engage in the Transaction. Furthermore, we
express no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any
compensation to any officers, directors, or employees of any
party to the Transaction, or any class of such persons relative
to the Consideration to be paid to the holders of the Company
Common Stock in the Transaction or with respect to the fairness
of any such compensation. We are expressing no opinion herein as
to the price at which the Company Common Stock, the Merger
Partner Common Stock or the Parent Common Stock will trade at
any future time.
B-2
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the Transaction and will receive a fee from the Company for
our services, a substantial portion of which will become payable
only if the Transaction is consummated. In addition, the Company
has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out
of our engagement. During the two years preceding the date of
this letter, we and our affiliates have had commercial or
investment banking relationships with the Company and the Merger
Partner, for which we and such affiliates have received
customary compensation. Such services during such period have
included providing treasury and securities services to the
Company, acting as a joint bookrunner on the Merger
Partners $1,400,000,000 common stock offering in June
2009, acting as a joint bookrunner on the Merger Partners
$2,500,000,000 bond offering in June 2009, acting as the Merger
Partners financial advisor in connection with its
acquisition of WellPoint Inc.s NextRx subsidiaries NextRx,
LLC, NextRx, Inc. and NextRx Services, Inc., in June 2009 and
acting as a joint bookrunner on the Merger Partners
$1,500,000,000 bond offering in April 2011. In the ordinary
course of our businesses, we and our affiliates may actively
trade the debt and equity securities of the Company, the Merger
Partner or the Parent for our own account or for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, we may at any time hold long or
short positions in such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the Consideration to be paid to the
holders of the Company Common Stock in the Transaction is fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders.
The issuance of this opinion has been approved by a fairness
opinion committee of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. This
letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company (in
its capacity as such) in connection with and for the purposes of
its evaluation of the Transaction. This opinion does not
constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company as
to how such shareholder should vote with respect to the
Transaction or any other matter. This opinion may not be
disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in whole or in part) to
any third party for any purpose whatsoever except with our prior
written approval. This opinion may be reproduced in full in any
proxy or information statement mailed to shareholders of the
Company but may not otherwise be disclosed publicly in any
manner without our prior written approval.
Very truly yours,
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
B-3
Annex C
[Letterhead
of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC]
July 20,
2011
The Board of Directors
Plato, Inc.
100 Parsons Pond Drive
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
Dear Members of the Board:
We understand that Plato, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Plato), Aristotle, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Aristotle), Aristotle Holding, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Aristotle
(Parent), Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(Aristotle Merger Sub), and Plato Merger Sub, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(Plato Merger Sub), propose to enter into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 2011
(the Agreement), pursuant to which Aristotle and
Plato will become wholly owned subsidiaries of Parent (the
Transaction).
Pursuant to the Agreement, Aristotle Merger Sub will be merged
with and into Aristotle, with Aristotle continuing as the
surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(the Aristotle Merger), and Plato Merger Sub will be
merged with and into Plato, with Plato continuing as the
surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent
(the Plato Merger). Pursuant to the Agreement,
(i) in the Aristotle Merger, each common share, par value
$0.01 per share, of Aristotle ( Aristotle Common
Stock), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time of the Aristotle Merger, other than shares of
Aristotle Common Stock held in treasury by Aristotle or owned by
Aristotle, Aristotle Merger Sub or any other wholly owned
subsidiary of Aristotle, will be converted into one share of
common stock of Parent (Parent Common Stock) and
(ii) each common share, par value $0.01 per share, of Plato
( Plato Common Stock), issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the Plato Merger,
other than shares of Plato Common Stock held in treasury by
Plato or owned by Plato, Plato Merger Sub or any other wholly
owned subsidiary of Plato, or holders who are entitled to and
properly demand an appraisal of their shares of Plato Common
Stock (all such holders, together with Plato, Plato Merger Sub
or any other wholly owned subsidiary of Plato, the
Excluded Holders), will be converted into the right
to receive $28.80 in cash (the Cash Consideration)
and 0.810 shares of Parent Common Stock (such number of
shares, the Stock Consideration and, together with
the Cash Consideration, the Consideration), subject
to certain adjustments as more fully described in the Agreement.
The terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully set
forth in the Agreement.
You have requested our opinion as of the date hereof as to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of
Plato Common Stock (other than Excluded Holders) of the
Consideration to be paid to such holders in the Transaction.
In connection with this opinion, we have:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Reviewed the financial terms and conditions of a draft, dated
July 19, 2011, of the Agreement;
|
|
|
(ii)
|
Reviewed certain publicly available historical business and
financial information relating to Plato and Aristotle;
|
|
|
(iii)
|
Reviewed various financial forecasts and other data provided to
us by Plato relating to the business of Plato, various financial
forecasts and other data provided to us by Aristotle and Plato
relating to the business of Aristotle and certain publicly
available financial forecasts and other data relating to the
business of Aristotle and Plato;
|
The Board of Directors
Plato, Inc.
July 20, 2011
Page 2
|
|
|
|
(iv)
|
Held discussions with members of the senior managements of Plato
and Aristotle with respect to the businesses and prospects of
Plato and Aristotle, respectively and reviewed the projected
synergies and other benefits, including the amount and timing
thereof, anticipated by the management of Plato and Aristotle to
be realized from the Transaction;
|
|
|
(v)
|
Reviewed public information with respect to certain other
companies in lines of business we believe to be generally
relevant in evaluating the businesses of Plato and Aristotle,
respectively;
|
|
|
(vi)
|
Reviewed the financial terms of certain business combinations
involving companies in lines of business we believe to be
generally relevant in evaluating the business of Plato;
|
|
|
(vii)
|
Reviewed historical stock prices and trading volumes of Plato
Common Stock and Aristotle Common Stock;
|
|
|
(viii)
|
Reviewed the potential pro forma financial impact of the
Transaction on Aristotle based on the financial forecasts
referred to above relating to Plato and Aristotle; and
|
|
|
(ix)
|
Conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as we deemed appropriate.
|
We have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of
the foregoing information, without independent verification of
such information. We have not conducted any independent
valuation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Plato or Aristotle or concerning
the solvency or fair value of Plato or Aristotle, and we have
not been furnished with any such valuation or appraisal. At your
direction, for purposes of our analyses, we utilized financial
forecasts with respect to Aristotle for the period from 2011
through 2014 that were provided by management of Aristotle and
for the period after 2014 that were provided by you based upon
guidance from the management of Aristotle. With respect to all
of the financial forecasts utilized in our analyses, including
those related to projected synergies anticipated by the
managements of Plato and Aristotle to be realized from the
Transaction, we have assumed, with the consent of Plato, that
they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments as to the future
financial performance of Plato and Aristotle, respectively, and
such synergies. With respect to the synergies and financial
benefits anticipated by the managements of Plato and Aristotle
to be realized from the Transaction, we have assumed, with the
consent of Plato, that the estimates of the amounts and timing
of such synergies and financial benefits are reasonable and that
such financial benefits will be realized substantially in
accordance with such estimates in all material respects relevant
to our analysis. We assume no responsibility for and express no
view as to any such forecasts or the assumptions on which they
are based.
Further, our opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to us as of, the date hereof. We assume no
responsibility for updating or revising our opinion based on
circumstances or events occurring after the date hereof. We do
not express any opinion as to the prices at which shares of
Plato Common Stock or Aristotle Common Stock may trade at any
time subsequent to the announcement of the Transaction. In
connection with our engagement, we were not authorized to, and
we did not, solicit indications of interest from third parties
regarding a potential transaction with Plato, nor were we
requested to consider, and our opinion does not address the
relative merits of the Transaction as compared to any other
transaction or business strategy in which Plato might engage or
the merits of the underlying decision by Plato to engage in the
Transaction.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed, with the consent of
Plato, that the Transaction will be consummated on the terms
described in the Agreement, without any waiver or modification
of any material terms or conditions. Representatives of Plato
have advised us, and we have assumed, that the Agreement, when
executed, will conform to the draft reviewed by us in all
material respects. We also have assumed, with the consent of
Plato, that obtaining the necessary governmental, regulatory or
third-party approvals and
C-2
The Board of Directors
Plato, Inc.
July 20, 2011
Page 3
consents for the Transaction will not have an adverse effect on
Plato, Aristotle or the Transaction. We further have assumed,
with the consent of Plato, that the Transaction will qualify for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as an exchange within the
meaning of Section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. We do not express any opinion as to any tax or
other consequences that might result from the Transaction, nor
does our opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or
accounting matters, as to which we understand that Plato
obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified
professionals. We express no view or opinion as to any terms or
other aspects (other than the Consideration to the extent
expressly specified herein) of the Transaction, including,
without limitation, the form or structure of the Transaction, or
any agreements or arrangements entered into in connection with,
or contemplated by, the Transaction. In addition, we express no
view or opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of,
or any other aspects relating to, the compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of any parties to the
Transaction, or class of such persons, relative to the
Consideration or otherwise.
Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (Lazard) is
acting as financial advisor to Plato in connection with the
Transaction and will receive a fee for such services, a portion
of which is payable upon execution of the Agreement and a
substantial portion of which is contingent upon the consummation
of the Transaction. We in the past have provided, currently are
providing, and in the future may provide, certain investment
banking services to Plato, for which we have received and may
receive compensation, including, during the past two years,
having provided advisory services to Plato in connection with
its 2010 acquisition of United BioSource. In addition, in the
ordinary course of their respective businesses, Lazard, LFCM
Holdings LLC (an entity indirectly owned in large part by
managing directors of Lazard) and their respective affiliates
may actively trade securities of Plato, Aristotle and certain of
their respective affiliates for their own accounts and for the
accounts of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time
hold a long or short position in such securities, and may also
trade and hold securities on behalf of Plato, Aristotle and
certain of their respective affiliates. The issuance of this
opinion was approved by the Opinion Committee of Lazard.
Our engagement and the opinion expressed herein are for the
benefit of the Board of Directors of Plato (in its capacity as
such) and our opinion is rendered to the Board of Directors of
Plato in connection with its evaluation of the Transaction. Our
opinion is not intended to and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act with respect to the Transaction or any matter
relating thereto.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
that, as of the date hereof, the Consideration is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Plato Common Stock
(other than the Excluded Holders).
Very truly yours,
LAZARD FRÈRES & CO. LLC
David Gluckman, M.D.
Managing Director
C-3
Annex D
[Letterhead
of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC]
July 20, 2011
Board of Directors
Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
St. Louis, Missouri 63121
Board of Directors:
You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to Express Scripts, Inc.
(Express Scripts) of the Medco Consideration (as
defined below) to be paid pursuant to the terms of an Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 2011 (the
Merger Agreement), among Express Scripts, Medco
Health Solutions, Inc. (Medco), Aristotle Holding,
Inc. (New Express Scripts), a newly-formed wholly
owned subsidiary of Express Scripts, and Aristotle Merger Sub,
Inc. (Express Scripts Merger Sub) and Plato Merger
Sub, Inc. (Medco Merger Sub), each a newly-formed
wholly owned subsidiary of New Express Scripts. The Merger
Agreement provides for, among other things, the acquisition by
Express Scripts of Medco through (i) the merger of Express
Scripts Merger Sub with and into Express Scripts (the
Express Scripts Merger) pursuant to which each
outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Express Scripts Common Stock), of Express Scripts
will be converted into the right to receive one share of the
common stock, par value $0.01 per share (New Express
Scripts Common Stock), of New Express Scripts and
(ii) the merger of Medco Merger Sub with and into Medco
(the Medco Merger and, together with the Express
Scripts Merger, the Transaction) pursuant to which
each outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per
share (Medco Common Stock), of Medco will be
converted into the right to receive (i) $28.80 in cash and
(ii) 0.81 (the Medco Exchange Ratio) of a share
of New Express Scripts Common Stock (such cash amount and such
fraction of a share of New Express Scripts Common Stock issuable
pursuant to the Medco Exchange Ratio, collectively, the
Medco Consideration).
In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed the Merger
Agreement and certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Express Scripts and Medco. We also have
reviewed certain other information relating to Express Scripts
and Medco provided to or discussed with us by Express Scripts
and Medco, including financial forecasts relating to Express
Scripts and Medco prepared by the respective managements of
Express Scripts and Medco (as adjusted, in the case of Medco, by
the management of Express Scripts), and have met with the
managements of Express Scripts and Medco to discuss the
businesses and prospects of Express Scripts and Medco,
respectively. We also have considered certain financial and
stock market data of Express Scripts and Medco, and we have
compared that data with similar data for other publicly held
companies in businesses we deemed similar to those of Express
Scripts and Medco, and we have considered, to the extent
publicly available, the financial terms of certain other
business combinations and transactions which have been effected
or announced. We also considered such other information,
financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial,
economic and market criteria which we deemed relevant.
In connection with our review, we have not independently
verified any of the foregoing information and we have assumed
and relied upon such information being complete and accurate in
all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts
for Express Scripts and Medco that we have utilized in our
analyses, the managements of Express Scripts and Medco have
advised us, and we have assumed, that such forecasts (including,
in the case of Medco, adjustments thereto by the management of
Express Scripts) have been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the managements of Express Scripts and Medco, as the case may
be, as to the future financial performance of Express Scripts
and Medco. With respect to estimates provided to us by the
management of Express Scripts regarding cost savings and
synergies anticipated to result from the Transaction, the
management of Express Scripts has advised us, and we have
assumed, that they have been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the
Board of Directors
Express Scripts, Inc.
July 20, 2011
Page 2
best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Express Scripts and that such cost savings and
synergies will be realized in the amounts and at the times
indicated thereby. We also have assumed, with your consent, for
federal income tax purposes that the Express Scripts Merger and
the Medco Merger, taken together, will qualify as an
exchange within the meaning of Section 351 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In addition, we
have relied upon, with your consent and without independent
verification, the assessments of the management of Express
Scripts as to (i) business trends and prospects for, and
governmental and regulatory policies and matters affecting, the
pharmacy benefit management, specialty pharmacy and broader
healthcare industry and the potential impact thereof on Express
Scripts, Medco or the contemplated benefits of the Transaction
and (ii) Medcos relationships (including, without
limitation, material agreements) with clients, pharmacy
providers, pharmaceutical manufacturers and other suppliers and
Express Scripts ability to integrate the businesses and
operations of Express Scripts and Medco. We have assumed, with
your consent, that there will be no developments with respect to
any such matters that would be material to our analyses or
opinion.
We have assumed, with your consent, that, in the course of
obtaining any regulatory or third party consents, approvals or
agreements in connection with the Transaction, no delay,
limitation, restriction or condition, including any divestiture
requirements, will be imposed that would have an adverse effect
on Express Scripts, Medco or the contemplated benefits of the
Transaction and that the Transaction will be consummated in
accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement without
waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement thereof. We have not been requested to
make, and have not made, an independent evaluation or appraisal
of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of
Express Scripts or Medco, nor have we been furnished with any
such evaluations or appraisals.
Our opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point
of view and as of the date hereof, to Express Scripts of the
Medco Consideration to be paid in the Transaction and does not
address any other aspect or implication of the Transaction,
including, without limitation, the form or structure of the
Medco Consideration or the Transaction (or the tax or accounting
consequences thereof) or any agreement, arrangement or
understanding entered into in connection with the Transaction or
otherwise. Our opinion also does not address the fairness of the
amount or nature of, or any other aspect relating to, any
compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any
party to the Transaction, or class of such persons, relative to
the Medco Consideration or otherwise. The issuance of this
opinion was approved by our authorized internal committee.
Our opinion is necessarily based upon information made available
to us as of the date hereof and financial, economic, market and
other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date
hereof. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value
of shares of New Express Scripts Common Stock actually will be
when issued pursuant to the Transaction or the prices at which
shares of Express Scripts Common Stock, Medco Common Stock or
New Express Scripts Common Stock will trade at any time. Our
opinion also does not address the relative merits of the
Transaction as compared to alternative transactions or
strategies that might be available to Express Scripts, nor does
it address the underlying business decision of Express Scripts
to proceed with the Transaction.
We have acted as financial advisor to Express Scripts in
connection with the Transaction and will receive a fee for our
services, the principal portion of which is contingent upon
consummation of the Transaction. We also became entitled to
receive a fee upon the rendering of our opinion. As you are
aware, we and certain of our affiliates expect to provide or
arrange financing for the Transaction, for which we and such
affiliates would receive compensation. In addition, Express
Scripts has agreed to indemnify us and certain related parties
for certain liabilities and other items arising out of or
related to our engagement. We and our affiliates in the past
have provided and currently are providing investment banking and
other financial services to Express Scripts unrelated to the
Transaction, for which services we and our affiliates have
received and will receive compensation, including having acted
or currently acting as (i) joint book-running manager for a
$1.5 billion
D-2
Board of Directors
Express Scripts, Inc.
July 20, 2011
Page 3
senior notes offering, a $2.5 billion senior notes offering
and an approximately $1.6 billion common stock offering of
Express Scripts, (ii) financial advisor to Express Scripts
in connection with Express Scripts $4.675 billion
acquisition of the NextRx pharmacy benefit management services
business of WellPoint, Inc. and lead arranger for a related
bridge term loan financing undertaken by Express Scripts and
(iii) joint lead arranger and joint book-running manager
for, or administrative agent for and lender under, an existing
$750 million revolving credit facility of Express Scripts.
We are a full service securities firm engaged in securities
trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment
banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of
business, we and our affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for
our and our affiliates own accounts and the accounts of
customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial
instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of
Express Scripts, Medco and their respective affiliates and any
other company that may be involved in the Transaction, as well
as provide investment banking and other financial services to
such companies. In addition, we and our affiliates maintain
commercial (including customer) relationships with Express
Scripts.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of Express Scripts (in its capacity as such)
in connection with its evaluation of the Transaction and does
not constitute advice or a recommendation to any stockholder as
to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matter
relating to the proposed Transaction or otherwise.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Medco Consideration to be paid in the
Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to Express
Scripts.
Very truly yours,
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC
D-3
Annex E
[Letterhead
Of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.]
July 20, 2011
The Board of Directors
Express Scripts, Inc.
One Express Way
St Louis, MO 63121
Members of the Board:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to Express Scripts, Inc. (the
Company) of the Consideration (defined below) to be
issued and paid by the Company pursuant to the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the Merger Agreement), dated as of July 20,
2011, by and among the Company, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Target), Aristotle Holding,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct, wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company (Parent), Aristotle Merger
Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent (Company Merger Sub), and Plato Merger Sub,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of
Parent (Target Merger Sub). As more fully described
in the Merger Agreement, (i) Company Merger Sub will be
merged with and into the Company (the Company
Merger); (ii) immediately following the Company
Merger, the Target Merger Sub will be merged with and into the
Target (the Target Merger and together with the
Company Merger, the Merger; (iii) each
outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of the Company (the Company Common Stock)
(other than shares held in the treasury of the Company or owned
by the Company, Company Merger Sub or any other wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company) shall be converted into one share of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share of Parent (Parent
Common Stock); (iv) each outstanding share of the common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Target (Target Common
Stock) (other than shares held in the treasury of the
Target or owned by any Target subsidiary, the Company or any of
its subsidiaries or shares as to which appraisal rights are
property exercised) will be converted into the right to receive
$28.80 in cash (the Cash Consideration) and 0.81 of
a share of Parent Common Stock (the Stock
Consideration, together with the Cash Consideration, the
Consideration), subject to certain limitations and
procedures as specified in the Merger Agreement.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed the Merger Agreement and
held discussions with certain senior officers, directors and
other representatives and advisors of the Company and certain
senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Target
concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of the
Company and Target and the effects of the Merger on the
financial condition and future prospects of the Company. We
examined certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to the Company and Target as well as
certain financial forecasts and other information and data
relating to the Company and Target which were provided to or
discussed with us by the respective managements of the Company
and the Target, including information relating to the potential
strategic implications and operational benefits (including the
amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the
management of the Company (with input from the management of the
Target) to result from the Merger. Certain information with
respect to the Target was modified by management of the Company
and we were instructed to use such information as so modified
for purposes of our opinion. We reviewed the financial terms of
the Merger as set forth in the Merger Agreement in relation to,
among other things: current and historical market prices of
Company Common Stock and Target Common Stock; the historical and
projected earnings and other operating data of the Company and
Target; and the capitalization and financial condition of the
Company and Target. We considered, to the extent publicly
available, the financial terms of certain other transactions
which we considered relevant in evaluating the Merger and
analyzed certain financial, stock market and other publicly
available information relating to the businesses of other
companies whose operations we considered relevant in evaluating
those of the Company and Target. We also evaluated certain
potential pro forma financial effects of the Merger on the
Company based on the information provided to us by management of
the Company. In addition to the foregoing, we conducted such
other analyses and examinations and considered such other
information and financial, economic and market criteria as we
deemed relevant and appropriate in arriving at our opinion. The
issuance of our opinion has been authorized by our fairness
opinion committee.
In rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without
independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of
all financial and other information and data publicly available
or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and
upon the assurances of the managements of the Company and Target
that they are not aware of any relevant information that has
been omitted or that remains undisclosed to us. With respect to
financial forecasts and other information and data provided to
or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us, relating to the
Company and Target, and in the case of certain pro forma
financial effects of, and strategic implications and operating
benefits resulting from, the Merger, we have been advised by the
management of the Company that such forecasts and other
information and data were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the management of the Company as to the future financial
performance of the Company and Target, such strategic
implications and operational benefits (including the amount,
timing and achievability thereof) anticipated to result from the
Merger and the other matters covered thereby, and have assumed,
with your consent, that the financial results (including such
potential strategic implications and operational benefits
anticipated to result from the Merger) reflected in such
forecasts and other information and data will be realized in the
amounts and at the times projected.
We have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be
consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver,
modification or amendment of any material term, condition or
agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary
regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for
the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will
be imposed that would have an adverse effect on the Company,
Target or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. We have not
made or been provided with an independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise)
of Target nor have we made any physical inspection of the
properties or assets of Target. We express no view as to, and
our opinion does not address, the underlying business decision
of the Company to effect the Merger, the relative merits of the
Merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that
might exist for the Company or the effect of any other
transaction in which the Company might engage. Our opinion, as
set forth herein, relates to the relative values of the Company
and Target.
We have assumed that the representations and warranties made by
the Company and Target in the Merger Agreement are and will be
true and correct in all respects material to our analysis.
Finally, with your consent, we have relied upon the advice the
Company has received from its legal, regulatory, accounting and
tax advisors as to all legal, regulatory, accounting and tax
matters relating to the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
Our opinion is limited to the fairness, as of the date hereof,
from a financial point of view, of the Consideration to be paid
by the Company in the Merger, considered in the aggregate, and
we express no opinion as to the fairness of the Merger to the
holders of any particular class of securities, creditors or
other constituencies of the Company or Target. We are not
expressing any opinion as to what the value of Company Common
Stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the Merger or the
price at which Company Common Stock will trade at any time. We
were not requested to, and we did not, participate in the
negotiation or structuring of the Merger. Furthermore, we
express no view as to, and our opinion does not address, the
underlying business decision of the Company to effect the
Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any
alternative business strategies that might exist for the Company
or the effect of any other transaction in which the Company
might engage. We also express no view as to, and our opinion
does not address, the fairness (financial or otherwise) of the
amount or nature or any other aspect of any compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of any parties to the Merger,
or any class of such persons, relative to the Consideration. Our
opinion is necessarily based upon information available to us,
and financial, stock market and other conditions and
circumstances existing, as of the date hereof. It should be
understood that subsequent developments may affect this opinion
and that we do not have any obligation to update, revise or
reaffirm this opinion.
E-2
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citi) has acted as
financial advisor to the Company in connection with the proposed
Merger and will receive a fee for such services, a significant
portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the
Merger. We also will receive a fee in connection with the
delivery of this opinion. An affiliate of Citi engaged in the
commercial lending business is acting as lender and syndication
agent for a credit facility to be used by the Company in
connection with the Merger, for which services such entity will
receive compensation. We and our affiliates in the past have
provided, and currently provide, services to the Company and its
affiliates unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services
we and our affiliates have received and expect to receive
compensation, including, without limitation, having acted as
Companys financial advisor in connection with its
acquisition of WellPoint Inc.s NextRx subsidiaries
announced in April 2009, including, in connection therewith,
serving as joint bookrunner on the Companys
5.25% Senior Notes due 2012 (aggregate principal amount
$1,000,000,000), 6.250% Senior Notes due 2014 (aggregate
principal amount $1,000,000,000) and 7.250% Senior Notes
due 2019 (aggregate principal amount $500,000,0000), and joint
bookrunner on the Companys $1,600,000,000 follow-on
offering of shares of Company Common Stock; joint lead arranger
and syndication agent, and a participant in, the Company
$750,000,000 revolving credit facility; and joint bookrunner
with respect to the Companys 3.125% Senior Notes due
2016 (aggregate principal amount $1,500,000,000). We and our
affiliates also in the past have provided , and currently
provide, services to the Target and its affiliates unrelated to
the proposed Merger, for which services we and our affiliates
have received and expect to receive compensation, including,
without limitation, serving as co-syndication agent and a
participant in the Targets $3,000,000,000 Senior Unsecured
Credit Facility maturing in April 2012; and as a participant in
the Targets $600,000,000,
364-day
renewable accounts receivable financing facility. In the
ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may
actively trade or hold the securities of the Company and Target
for our own account or for the account of our customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates (including
Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships
with the Company, Target and their respective affiliates. Our
advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided
for the information of the Board of Directors of the Company in
its evaluation of the proposed Merger, and our opinion is not
intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any
stockholders as to how such stockholder should vote or act on
any matters relating to the proposed Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as
investment bankers, our work as described above and other
factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of
the date hereof, the Consideration to be paid by the Company in
the Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Company.
Very truly yours,
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
E-3
Annex F
AMENDED
AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY
The name under which the Corporation was originally incorporated
is Aristotle Holding, Inc., and the original Certificate of
Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware on July 15, 2011.
1. The current name of the Corporation is Express Scripts
Holding Company.
2. The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any
lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized
under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
3. The address of the registered office of the Corporation
in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center, 1209
Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 in the County of New
Castle. The Corporation Trust Company is the
Corporations registered agent at that address.
4. The total number of shares of stock which the
Corporation has authority to issue is 3,000,000,000 shares,
of which (i) 15,000,000 shares are preferred stock,
par value $0.01 per share (the Preferred Stock), and
(ii) 2,985,000,000 shares are common stock, par value
$0.01 per share.
4.1. Preferred Stock.
4.1.1. The Board of Directors is hereby authorized to issue
the Preferred Stock in one or more series, to fix the number of
shares of any such series of Preferred Stock, and to fix,
through a certificate of designations filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware (the Preferred Stock
Designation), the designation of any such series as well
as the powers, preferences, and rights and the qualifications,
limitations, or restrictions of the Preferred Stock.
4.1.2. The authority of the Board of Directors shall
include, without limitation, the power to fix or alter the
dividend rights, dividend rate, conversion rights, voting
rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund
provisions, if any), the redemption price or prices, and the
liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued series of
Preferred Stock, and the number of shares constituting any such
unissued series and the designation thereof, or any of them; and
to increase or decrease the number of shares of any series
subsequent to the issue of that series, but not below the number
of shares of such series then outstanding. In case the number of
shares of any series shall be so decreased, the shares
constituting such decrease shall resume the status which they
had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally fixing
the number of shares of such series.
4.2. Common Stock. The Common Stock shall
be subject to the express terms of the Preferred Stock and any
series thereof. Except as otherwise provided by applicable law
or in this Certificate of Incorporation or in a Preferred Stock
Designation, the holders of shares of Common Stock shall be
entitled to one vote for each such share upon all questions
presented to the stockholders, the Common Stock shall have the
exclusive right to vote for the election of directors and for
all other purposes, and holders of Preferred Stock shall not be
entitled to receive notice of any meeting of stockholders at
which they are not entitled to vote.
The Corporation shall be entitled to treat the person in whose
name any share of its stock is registered as the owner thereof
for all purposes and shall not be bound to recognize any
equitable or other claim to, or interest in, such share on the
part of any other person, whether or not the Corporation shall
have notice thereof, except as expressly provided by applicable
law.
5. The Board of Directors shall have the power to make,
alter or repeal the by-laws of the Corporation.
6. The election of the Board of Directors need not be by
written ballot.
F-1
7. The Corporation shall indemnify to the fullest extent
permitted by Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware as amended from time to time each person
who is or was a director or officer of the Corporation and the
heirs, executors and administrators of such a person.
8. No director shall be personally liable to the
Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director for any act or omission
occurring subsequent to the date when this provision becomes
effective, except that he may be liable (i) for any breach
of the directors duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its
stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation
of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or (iv) for any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit. Neither the amendment nor repeal of this
Article Eight, nor the adoption of any provision of the
Certificate of Incorporation inconsistent with this
Article Eight, shall eliminate or reduce the effect of this
Article Eight in respect of any matter occurring, or any
cause of action, suit or claim that, but for this
Article Eight, would accrue or arise, prior to such
amendment, repeal or adoption of an inconsistent provision.
9. No action required or permitted to be taken at any
annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation may
be taken without a meeting, and the power of stockholders of the
Corporation to consent in writing, without a meeting, to the
taking of any action is specifically denied; provided, however,
that the holders of Preferred Stock may act by written consent
to the extent provided in a resolution or resolutions of the
Board of Directors authorizing the issuance of a particular
series of Preferred Stock pursuant to Article Four of this
Certificate of Incorporation.
10. The Corporation expressly elects not to be governed by
Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
11. This Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
is duly adopted in accordance with Sections 242 and 245 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Express Scripts Holding Company has caused
this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be
executed by President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board this [date].
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Name:
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
|
F-2
Annex G
AMENDED
AND RESTATED
BYLAWS
of
EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY
1. MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS.
1.1 Annual Meeting. The
annual meeting of stockholders shall be held on the date and at
the time fixed from time to time by the board of directors (the
Board), provided, that each successive annual
meeting shall be held on the fourth Wednesday in May of each
year if not a legal holiday, and if a legal holiday then on the
next succeeding day not a legal holiday, or on such other date
or time and at such place as may be determined from time to time
by resolutions adopted by the Board.
1.2 Special
Meetings. (a) Subject to the rights of
the holders of any series of preferred stock under the
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the corporation
(the Certificate of Incorporation), special meetings
of the stockholders may be called by the chairman of the Board
or the chief executive officer or by resolution of the Board,
or, solely to the extent required by Section 1.2(b), by the
secretary of the corporation.
(b) (i) A special meeting of stockholders shall be
called by the secretary upon the written request or requests
(each, a Special Meeting Request and collectively,
the Special Meeting Requests) of the holders of
record representing not less than thirty-five percent (35%) of
the voting power of all capital stock issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought before
the proposed special meeting (the Requisite
Percent), subject to this Section 1.2(b) and all
other applicable sections of these Bylaws (a Stockholder
Requested Special Meeting). The secretary shall determine
in good faith whether all requirements set forth in these Bylaws
relating to a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting have been
satisfied and such determination shall be binding on the
corporation and its stockholders. For purposes of this
Section 1.2(b) and for determining the Requisite Percent, a
stockholder of record or a beneficial owner, as the case may be,
shall be deemed to own the shares of capital stock of the
corporation that such stockholder or, if such stockholder is a
nominee, custodian or other agent that is holding the shares on
behalf of another person (the beneficial owner),
that the beneficial owner would be deemed to own pursuant to
Rule 200(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), excluding any shares as
to which such stockholder or beneficial owner, as the case may
be, does not have the right to vote or direct the vote at the
special meeting or as to which such stockholder or beneficial
owner, as the case may be, has entered into a derivative or
other agreement, arrangement or understanding that hedges or
transfers, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, any of
the economic consequences of ownership of such shares. Whether
shares are owned for these purposes shall be decided by the
secretary in its good faith.
(ii) A Special Meeting Request shall be delivered by
registered U.S. mail, return receipt requested or courier
service, postage prepaid, to the attention of the secretary at
the principal executive offices of the corporation. To be valid,
a Special Meeting Request or Special Meeting Requests must be
signed and dated by stockholders (or their duly authorized
agents) representing the Requisite Percent and shall include:
(1) a statement of the specific purpose(s) of the special
meeting, a brief description of the business desired to be
brought before the meeting, and the reasons for conducting such
business at the special meeting;
(2) the text of the proposal or business (including the
text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, in the
event that such business includes a proposal to amend the Bylaws
of the corporation, the language of the proposed amendment);
(3) as to the stockholders requesting the special meeting
and the beneficial owners, if any, on whose behalf the Special
Meeting Request(s) are being made, the Proposing Stockholder
Information as defined in Section 1.13(b) of these Bylaws
required to be set forth in a stockholders notice required
by Section 1.11(b) and 1.12(b) of these Bylaws, as
applicable;
G-1
(4) in the case of any director nominations proposed to be
presented at the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, such
other information regarding the nominees required to be provided
pursuant to Section 1.11(a) of these Bylaws and required to
be set forth in a stockholders notice required by
Section 1.11(b) of these Bylaws (including, but not limited
to, such other information required to be set forth in
connection with a stockholders director nomination);
(5) in the case of any other business proposed to be
conducted at the Stockholder Requested Special Meeting, such
other information required to be set forth in a
stockholders notice required by Section 1.12(b) of
these Bylaws;
(6) documentary evidence that the stockholders requesting
the special meeting own the Requisite Percent as of the date on
which the Special Meeting Request(s) are delivered to the
secretary; provided, however, that if the stockholders of record
making the request are not the beneficial owners of the shares
representing the Requisite Percent, then to be valid, the
Special Meeting Request(s) must also include documentary
evidence (or, if not simultaneously provided with the Special
Meeting Request(s), such documentary evidence must be delivered
to the secretary within 10 days after the date on which the
Special Meeting Request(s) are delivered to the secretary) that
the beneficial owners on whose behalf the Special Meeting
Request(s) are made beneficially own the Requisite Percent as of
the date on which such Special Meeting Request(s) are delivered
to the secretary; and
(7) an agreement by the requesting stockholder(s) and the
beneficial owner(s), if any, on whose behalf the Special Meeting
Request(s) are being made, to notify the corporation immediately
in the case of any disposition prior to the Stockholder
Requested Special Meeting of shares of common stock of the
corporation owned of record or beneficially owned, as
applicable, and an acknowledgement that any such disposition
shall be deemed a revocation of such Special Meeting Request,
such that the number of shares disposed of shall not be included
in determining whether the Requisite Percent has been reached or
is maintained. In addition, the stockholders requesting a
special meeting of stockholders, the beneficial owners, if any,
on whose behalf the Special Meeting Request(s) are being made,
and the proposed nominees, if any, shall promptly provide any
other information reasonably requested by the corporation,
including as to the eligibility of any proposed nominee to serve
as an independent director of the corporation and to comply with
applicable law. Such stockholders, beneficial owners and
nominees shall further update and supplement the information
required under
Section 1.2(b)(ii)(3)-(7)
of these Bylaws not later than 10 days after the record
date for the meeting so that such information shall be true and
correct as of the record date, and with respect to information
required under Section 1.2(b)(ii)(6), as of a date not more
than 5 business days before the scheduled date of the special
meeting.
(iii) In determining whether a special meeting of
stockholders has been requested by the record holders of shares
representing in the aggregate at least the Requisite Percent,
multiple Special Meeting Requests delivered to the secretary
will be considered together only if each such Special Meeting
Request (x) identifies substantially the same purpose or
purposes of the special meeting and substantially the same
matters proposed to be acted on at the special meeting (in each
case as determined in good faith by the Board), and (y) has
been dated and delivered to the secretary within sixty days of
the earliest dated of such Special Meeting Requests.
(iv) Any requesting stockholder may revoke his, her or its
Special Meeting Request at any time by written revocation
delivered to the secretary at the principal executive offices of
the corporation; provided, however, that if following such
revocation (or any deemed revocation pursuant to
Section 1.2(b)(ii)(7) above), the unrevoked valid Special
Meeting Requests represent in the aggregate less than the
Requisite Percent at any time prior to the Shareholder Requested
Special Meeting, there shall be no requirement to hold a special
meeting and the Board may, in its discretion, cancel such
meeting. The first date on which unrevoked valid Special Meeting
Requests constituting not less than the Requisite Percent shall
have been delivered to the corporation is referred to herein as
the Request Receipt Date.
G-2
(v) Notwithstanding the foregoing, a special meeting
requested by stockholders shall not be held if:
(1) the stockholders, the beneficial owners, if any, on
whose behalf the Special Meeting Request(s) are being made, or
proposed nominees, if any, do not comply with the requirements
of this Section 1.2(b);
(2) in the case of a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting
that is called for the purpose of electing nominees to the
Board, no proposed nominee meets the eligibility criteria set
forth in Section 1.11(a) of these Bylaws;
(3) the Special Meeting Request relates to an item of
business that is not a proper subject for stockholder action
under applicable law;
(4) the Request Receipt Date is during the period
commencing ninety days prior to the first anniversary of the
date of the immediately preceding annual meeting and ending on
the earlier of (x) the date of the next annual meeting and
(y) 30 days after the first anniversary of the date of
the previous annual meeting;
(5) an identical or substantially similar item (as
determined in good faith by the Board, a Similar
Item) was presented at a meeting of the stockholders held
not more than 120 days before the Request Receipt Date (for
purposes of this clause (5), election or removal of directors
shall be deemed to be a Similar Item with respect to all items
of business involving the nomination, election or removal of
directors, changing the size of the Board and filling of
vacancies
and/or newly
created directorships resulting from any increase in the
authorized number of directors);
(6) the Board has called or calls for an annual or special
meeting of stockholders to be held within 120 days of the
Request Receipt Date and the business to be conducted at such
meeting includes a Similar Item; or
(7) the Special Meeting Request(s) was made in a manner
that involved a violation of Regulation 14A under the
Exchange Act, or other applicable law.
(vi) Special meetings shall be held at such date and time
as specified by the Board in accordance with these Bylaws;
provided; however, that a Stockholder Requested Special Meeting
shall not be held more than ninety days after the Request
Receipt Date.
(vii) If none of the stockholders who submitted the Special
Meeting Request appears or sends a qualified representative to
present the matters for consideration that were specified in the
Stockholder Meeting Request, the corporation need not present
such matters for a vote at such meeting, notwithstanding that
proxies in respect of such matter may have been received by the
corporation.
(viii) Business transacted at any Stockholder Requested
Special Meeting shall be limited to (1) the purposes set
forth in the valid Special Meeting Request(s) received from the
Requisite Percent of record holders and (2) any additional
matters that the Board of Directors determines to include in the
Corporations notice of the meeting. Only business related
to the purposes set forth in the notice of the meeting may be
transacted at a special meeting called by the chairman of the
Board or the chief executive officer or by resolution of the
Board.
1.3 Place and Time of
Meetings. Meetings of the stockholders may be
held in or outside Delaware at the place and time specified by
the Board; provided that the Board may, in its sole discretion,
determine that the meeting shall not be held at any place, but
may instead be held solely by means of remote communication as
authorized by Section 211(a)(2) of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware (the General Corporation Law
of Delaware).
1.4 Notice of Meeting; Waiver of
Notice. (a) Written or printed notice of
each meeting of stockholders shall be given by or at the
direction of the secretary or the chief executive officer of the
corporation to each stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting,
except that (a) it shall not be necessary to give notice to
any stockholder who properly waives notice before or after the
meeting, whether in writing or by electronic transmission or
otherwise, and (b) no notice of an adjourned meeting need
be given except when required
G-3
under Section 1.6 of these Bylaws or by law. Each notice of
a meeting shall be given, personally or by mail or, as provided
below, by means of electronic transmission, not less than ten
(10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the meeting
and shall state the time and place of the meeting, or if held by
remote communications, the means of remote communication by
which stockholders and proxy holders may be deemed to be present
in person and vote at such meeting, and unless it is the annual
meeting, shall state at whose direction or request the meeting
is called and the purposes for which it is called. The
attendance of any stockholder at a meeting, without protesting
at the beginning of the meeting that the meeting is not lawfully
called or convened, shall constitute a waiver of notice by him
or her. Any previously scheduled meeting of stockholders may be
postponed, and (unless the Certificate of Incorporation
otherwise provides) any special meeting of stockholders may be
canceled, by resolution of the Board upon public disclosure (as
defined in Section 1.13(a)) given on or prior to the date
previously scheduled for such meeting of stockholders.
(b) Without limiting the manner by which notice otherwise
may be given effectively to stockholders, any notice to a
stockholder may be given by a form of electronic transmission
consented to by the stockholder to whom the notice is given. Any
such consent shall be revocable by the stockholder by written
notice to the corporation. Any such consent shall be deemed
revoked (1) if the corporation is unable to deliver by
electronic transmission two consecutive notices given by the
corporation in accordance with such consent and (2) such
inability becomes known to the secretary or an assistant
secretary of the corporation or to the transfer agent, or other
person responsible for the giving of notice; provided, however,
the inadvertent failure to treat such inability as a revocation
shall not invalidate any meeting or other action. For purposes
of these Bylaws, electronic transmission means any
form of communication, not directly involving the physical
transmission of paper, that creates a record that may be
retained, retrieved and reviewed by a recipient thereof, and
that may be directly reproduced in paper form by such a
recipient through an automated process.
(c) Notice shall be deemed given, if mailed, when deposited
in the United States mail with postage prepaid, if addressed to
a stockholder at his or her address on the corporations
records. Notice given by electronic transmission shall be deemed
given: (1) if by facsimile, when directed to a number at
which the stockholder has consented to receive notice;
(2) if by electronic mail, when directed to an electronic
mail address at which the stockholder has consented to receive
notice; (3) if by posting on an electronic network together
with separate notice to the stockholder of such specific
posting, upon the later of (A) such posting and
(B) the giving of such separate notice; and (4) by any
other form of electronic transmission, when directed to the
stockholder.
(d) An affidavit of the secretary or an assistant secretary
or of the transfer agent or other agent of the corporation that
the notice has been given, whether by a form of electronic
transmission or otherwise, shall, in the absence of fraud, be
prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.
1.5 Quorum; Voting; Validation of
Meeting. (a) The holders of a majority
in voting power of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled
to vote thereat, present in person or represented by proxy,
shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the stockholders
for the transaction of business except as otherwise provided by
statute or by the Certificate of Incorporation. If, however,
such quorum is not present or represented at any meeting of the
stockholders, then either (i) the person presiding over the
meeting or (ii) the stockholders by the vote of a majority
of the voting power of the stock, present in person or
represented by proxy shall have power to adjourn the meeting in
accordance with Section 1.6 of these Bylaws.
(b) (i) When a quorum is present at any meeting,
except as provided below in the case of a contested election (as
defined herein) and subject to the rights of the holders of
preferred stock to elect directors under specified circumstances
pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation, each director to
be elected by stockholders shall be elected by the vote of the
majority of the votes cast at any meeting for the election of
directors at which a quorum is present. On all other matters,
the vote of the holders of a majority of the stock having voting
power on such matter present in person or represented by proxy
and entitled to vote on the matter shall decide any question
brought before such meeting, unless the question is one upon
which, by express provision of the laws of the State of Delaware
or of the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, a vote
of a greater number or voting by classes is required, in which
case such express provision shall govern and control the
G-4
decision of the question. In all matters, votes cast in
accordance with any method adopted by the corporation shall be
valid so long as such method is permitted under Delaware law.
(ii) For purposes of this Section 1.5(b), a majority
of votes cast shall mean that the number of votes cast
for a directors election exceeds the number of
votes cast withhold or against that
directors election. Abstentions and
broker non-votes shall not be deemed to be votes
cast with respect to that directors election. In the event
of a contested election of directors, directors shall be elected
by a plurality of the votes cast in person or represented by
proxy and entitled to vote on the election of a director. For
purposes of this Section 1.5(b), a contested election shall
mean any election of directors in which the number of candidates
for election as directors exceeds the number of directors to be
elected, with the determination that an election is
contested to be made by the secretary of the
corporation (A) following the close of the applicable
notice of nomination period, if any, set forth in
Section 1.11 based on whether one or more notices of
nomination were timely filed in accordance with said
Section 1.11 or (B) if later, reasonably promptly
following the determination by any court or other tribunal of
competent jurisdiction that one or more notice(s) of nomination
were timely filed in accordance with said Section 1.11;
provided that the determination that an election is a
contested election by the secretary of the
corporation pursuant to clause (A) or (B) shall be
determinative only as to the timeliness of a notice of
nomination and not otherwise as to its validity. If, prior to
the time the corporation mails its initial proxy statement in
connection with such election of directors, one or more notices
of nomination are withdrawn (or declared invalid or untimely by
any court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction) such that
the number of candidates for election as director no longer
exceeds the number of directors to be elected, the election
shall not be considered a contested election, but in all other
cases, once an election is determined to be a contested
election, directors shall be elected by the vote of a plurality
of the votes cast.
(iii) In order for any incumbent director to become a
nominee of the Board for further service on the Board, such
person shall submit an irrevocable resignation, contingent on
(A) that persons not receiving a majority of the
votes cast in an election that is not a contested election, and
(B) acceptance of that resignation by the Board in
accordance with the policies and procedures set forth herein or
adopted by the Board for such purpose. In the event an incumbent
director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an
election that is not a contested election, the Corporate
Governance Committee of the Board, or any committee serving the
functions of the committee that is known as the Corporate
Governance Committee as of the effective date of these Bylaws
(the Corporate Governance Committee), shall make a
recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject
the resignation of such incumbent director, or whether other
action should be taken. The Board shall act on the resignation,
taking into account the Corporate Governance Committees
recommendation, and publicly disclose (by a press release, a
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission or other
broadly disseminated means of communication) its decision
regarding the resignation and the rationale behind the decision
within 90 days from the date of the certification of the
election results. The Corporate Governance Committee in making
its recommendation, and the Board in making its decision, may
each consider any factors or other information that it considers
appropriate and relevant. The director whose resignation is
being considered shall not participate in the recommendation of
the Corporate Governance Committee or the decision of the Board
with respect to his or her resignation. If such incumbent
directors resignation is not accepted by the Board, such
director shall continue to serve as a member of the Board until
the next succeeding annual meeting of shareholders and until his
or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or his or her
earlier resignation or removal. If a directors resignation
is accepted by the Board pursuant to these Bylaws, or if a
nominee for director is not elected and the nominee is not an
incumbent director, then the Board, in its sole discretion, may
fill any resulting vacancy pursuant to the provisions of
Section 2.10 or may decrease the size of the Board pursuant
to the provisions of Section 2.1.
(c) If a quorum is initially present, the stockholders may
continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding
the withdrawal of enough stockholders to leave less than a
quorum, if any action taken is approved by a majority of the
stockholders initially constituting the quorum.
(d) The transactions of any meeting of stockholders, either
annual or special, however called and noticed, and wherever
held, shall be as valid as though they had been taken at a
meeting duly held after regular call and notice, if a quorum is
present either in person or by proxy.
G-5
1.6 Adjourned Meeting;
Notice. (a) Whether or not a quorum is
present, either the person presiding over the meeting or the
stockholders by the vote of a majority of the voting power of
the stock, present in person or represented by proxy, shall have
the power to adjourn the meeting to another time or place or
means of remote communications. In the absence of a quorum, no
other business may be transacted at that meeting except as
provided in Section 1.5 of these Bylaws.
(b) When any meeting of stockholders, either annual or
special, is adjourned to another time or place or means of
remote communication, notice need not be given of the adjourned
meeting if the time and place, if any, thereof, and the means of
remote communication, if any, by which stockholders and
proxyholders may be deemed to be present in person and vote at
such adjourned meeting, are announced at the meeting at which
the adjournment is taken. However, if a new record date for the
adjourned meeting is fixed or if the adjournment is for more
than thirty (30) days from the date set for the original
meeting, then notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given.
Any such required notice of an adjourned meeting shall be given
to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the adjourned
meeting in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.4 of
these Bylaws. At any adjourned meeting the corporation may
transact any business that might have been transacted at the
original meeting.
1.7 Voting. (a) The
stockholders entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders
shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of
Section 1.8 of these Bylaws, subject to the provisions of
Sections 217 and 218 of the General Corporation Law of
Delaware (relating to voting rights of fiduciaries, pledgors and
joint owners, and to voting trusts and other voting agreements).
(b) Except as may be otherwise provided in the Certificate
of Incorporation, by these Bylaws or as required by law, each
stockholder shall be entitled to one vote for each share of
capital stock held by such stockholder which has voting power
upon the matter in question.
(c) Any stockholder entitled to vote on any matter may vote
part of the shares in favor of the proposal and refrain from
voting the remaining shares or, except when the matter is the
election of directors, may vote the remaining shares against the
proposal; but if the stockholder fails to specify the number of
shares which the stockholder is voting affirmatively or
otherwise indicates how the number of shares to be voted
affirmatively is to be determined, it will be conclusively
presumed that the stockholders approving vote is with
respect to all shares which the stockholder is entitled to vote.
(d) Voting need not be by ballot unless requested by a
stockholder at the meeting or ordered by the person presiding
over the meeting; however, all elections of directors shall be
by written ballot, unless otherwise provided in the Certificate
of Incorporation; provided, that if authorized by the Board, a
written ballot may be submitted by electronic transmission,
provided that any such electronic transmission must either set
forth or be submitted with information from which it can be
determined that the electronic transmission was authorized by
the stockholder or proxyholder.
1.8 Record Date for Stockholder
Notice. (a) For purposes of determining
the stockholders entitled to notice of any meeting or to vote
thereat, the Board may fix, in advance, a record date, which
shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing the
record date is adopted by the Board, and which record date shall
not be more than sixty (60) days nor less than ten
(10) days before the date of any such meeting, and in such
event only stockholders of record on the date so fixed are
entitled to notice and to vote, notwithstanding any transfer of
any shares on the books of the corporation after the record
date, except as otherwise provided in the Certificate of
Incorporation, by these Bylaws, by agreement or by applicable
law.
(b) If the Board does not so fix a record date, the record
date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of or to
vote at a meeting of stockholders shall be at the close of
business on the day next preceding the day on which notice is
given, or, if notice is waived, at the close of business on the
day next preceding the day on which the meeting is held.
(c) A determination of stockholders of record entitled to
notice of or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to
any adjournment of the meeting unless the Board fixes a new
record date for the adjourned meeting, but the Board shall fix a
new record date if the meeting is adjourned for more than thirty
(30) days from the date set for the original meeting.
G-6
(d) The record date for any other lawful purpose shall be
as provided in Section 5.8 of these Bylaws.
1.9 Proxies. Every person
entitled to vote for directors, or on any other matter, shall
have the right to do so either in person or by one or more
agents authorized by a written proxy filed with the secretary of
the corporation. A written proxy may be in the form of a
telegram, cablegram, or other means of electronic transmission
which sets forth or is submitted with information from which it
can be determined that the telegram, cablegram, or other means
of electronic transmission was authorized by the person. No such
proxy shall be voted or acted upon after three (3) years
from its date, unless the proxy provides for a longer period. A
duly executed proxy shall be irrevocable if it states that it is
irrevocable and if, and only as long as, it is coupled with an
interest sufficient in law to support an irrevocable power. The
revocability of a proxy that states on its face that it is
irrevocable shall be governed by the provisions of
Section 212(e) of the General Corporation Law of Delaware.
A stockholder may revoke any proxy which is not irrevocable by
attending the meeting and voting in person or by filing an
instrument in writing revoking the proxy or by filing another
duly executed proxy bearing a later date with the secretary of
the corporation.
A proxy is not revoked by the death or incapacity of the maker
unless, before the vote is counted, written notice of such death
or incapacity is received by the secretary of the corporation.
1.10 List of
Stockholders. Not less than 10 days
prior to the date of any meeting of stockholders, the secretary
of the corporation shall prepare a complete list of stockholders
entitled to vote at the meeting, arranged in alphabetical order
and showing the address of each stockholder and the number of
shares registered in the name of such stockholder; provided,
that the corporation shall not be required to include electronic
mail addresses or other electronic contact information on such
list. For a period of not less than 10 days prior to the
meeting, the list shall be available during ordinary business
hours for inspection by any stockholder for any purpose germane
to the meeting. During this period, the list shall be kept
either (1) on a reasonably accessible electronic network,
provided that the information required to gain access to such
list is provided with the notice of the meeting or
(2) during ordinary business hours, at the principal place
of business of the corporation. If the corporation determines to
make the list available on an electronic network, the
corporation may take reasonable steps to ensure that such
information is available only to stockholders of the
corporation. If the meeting is to be held at a place, then the
list shall be produced and kept at the time and place of the
meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by
any stockholder who is present. If the meeting is to be held
solely by means of remote communication, then the list shall
also be open to the examination of any stockholder during the
whole time of the meeting on a reasonably accessible electronic
network, and the information required to access such list shall
be provided with the notice of the meeting.
1.11 Nominations of
Directors. (a) Except as otherwise
provided in Section 1.2(b), only persons who are nominated
in accordance with the procedures set forth in this
Section 1.11 shall be eligible for election by the
stockholders as directors of the corporation. Nominations of
persons for election to the Board may be made at a meeting of
stockholders (i) pursuant to the corporations notice
of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the
direction of the Board, (ii) otherwise properly brought
before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board, or
(iii) provided that the Board has determined that directors
shall be elected at such meeting, by any stockholder of the
corporation who (A) is a stockholder of record at the time
of giving of the notice provided for in this Section 1.11
and at the time of the meeting, (B) is entitled to vote for
the election of directors at such meeting and (C) shall
have complied with the procedures set forth in this
Section 1.11; and except as otherwise provided in
Section 1.2(b), clause (iii) shall be the exclusive
means for a stockholder to make nominations of persons to the
Board before or at a meeting of stockholders. No stockholder,
other than the stockholders requesting a special meeting
pursuant to and in compliance with Section 1.2(b), shall be
permitted to submit nominations at any Stockholder Requested
Special Meeting. To be eligible to be a nominee for election or
re-election as a director of the corporation, the prospective
nominee (whether nominated by or at the direction of the Board
or by a stockholder), or someone acting on such prospective
nominees behalf, must deliver (in accordance with any
applicable time periods prescribed for delivery of notice under
this Section 1.11) to the secretary at the principal
executive offices of the corporation a written questionnaire
providing such information with respect to the background and
qualifications of such person and the background of any other
person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made
that would be required to be disclosed to stockholders pursuant
to applicable law or the rules and regulations of
G-7
any stock exchange applicable to the corporation, including all
information concerning such persons that would be required to be
disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors
pursuant to and in accordance with Regulation 14A under the
Exchange Act (which questionnaire shall be provided by the
secretary upon written request). The prospective nominee must
also provide a written representation and agreement, in the form
provided by the secretary upon written request, that such
prospective nominee: (i) will abide by the requirements of
Section 1.5(b)(iii); (ii) is not and will not become a
party to (A) any agreement, arrangement or understanding
with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any
person or entity as to how such prospective nominee, if elected
as a director of the corporation, will act or vote on any issue
or question (a Voting Commitment) that has not been
disclosed to the corporation or (B) any Voting Commitment
that could limit or interfere with such prospective
nominees ability to comply, if elected as a director of
the corporation, with such prospective nominees fiduciary
duties under applicable law; (iii) is not and will not
become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding
with any person or entity other than the corporation with
respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or
indemnification in connection with service or action as a
director that has not been disclosed therein; and
(iv) would be in compliance if elected as a director of the
corporation, and will comply with all applicable corporate
governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock
ownership and trading policies and guidelines of the
corporation. For purposes of this Section 1.11, a
nominee shall include any person being considered to
fill a vacancy on the Board.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.2(b),
nominations by any stockholder must be made pursuant to timely
notice in proper written form to the secretary of the
corporation in accordance with this paragraph. To be timely, a
stockholders notice must be delivered to and received by
the secretary at the principal executive offices of the
corporation (i) in the case of an annual meeting, not less
than 90 days nor more than 120 days in advance of the
first anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting;
provided, however, that in the event that no annual meeting was
held in the previous year or the date of the annual meeting has
been advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than
60 days from the date of the previous years meeting,
notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not
earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day prior
to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business
on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting
or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which public
disclosure (as defined in Section 1.13 hereof) of the date
of the meeting is first made, and (ii) in the case of a
special meeting at which the Board gives notice that directors
are to be elected, not earlier than the opening of business on
the 120th day prior to such special meeting and not later
than the close of business on the later of the 90th day
prior to such special meeting or, if later, the tenth day
following the day on which public disclosure is made of the date
of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board
to be elected at such meeting. In no event shall any adjournment
or postponement of a stockholders meeting or the public
disclosure thereof commence a new time period (or extend any
time period) for the giving of a stockholders notice as
described above.
To be in proper written form, such stockholders notice to
the secretary shall set forth in writing (i) as to each
person whom such stockholder proposes to nominate for election
or re-election as a director, (A) all information relating
to such person that would be required to be disclosed in
solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is
otherwise required, in each case pursuant to and in accordance
with Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such
persons written consent to being named in the proxy
statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected)
as well as (B) a description of all direct and indirect
compensation and other material monetary agreements,
arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and
any other material relationships, between or among such
stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
nomination is being made, and their respective affiliates and
associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the one
hand, and each proposed nominee, and his or her respective
affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert
therewith, on the other hand, including all information that
would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404
promulgated under
Regulation S-K
if the stockholder making the nomination and any beneficial
owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, if any, or any
affiliate or associate thereof or person acting in concert
therewith, were the registrant for purposes of such
rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of
such registrant; (ii) as to the stockholder giving the
notice and the beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination
is made, the Proposing Stockholder Information (as
G-8
defined in Section 1.13 hereof); (iii) a
representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of
stock of the corporation entitled to vote at such meeting and
intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to
propose such nomination; and (iv) a representation as to
whether the stockholder or the beneficial owner, if any,
intends, or is or intends to be part of a group that intends,
(A) to deliver a proxy statement
and/or form
of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the
corporations outstanding capital stock required to elect
the nominee
and/or
(B) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in
support of such nomination. At the request of the Board, any
person nominated by the Board for election as a director shall
furnish to the secretary that information required to be set
forth in a stockholders notice of nomination which
pertains to the nominee. The corporation may require any
proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may
reasonably be required by the corporation to determine the
eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent
director of the corporation or that could be material to a
reasonable stockholders understanding of the independence,
or lack thereof, of such nominee. Stockholders making a
nomination pursuant to this Section 1.11, beneficial owners
on whose behalf the nomination is made, and nominees shall
further update and supplement the information required under
this Section 1.11 not later than 10 days after the
record date for the meeting so that such information shall be
true and correct as of the record date. Notwithstanding anything
in this Section 1.11 to the contrary, in the event that the
number of directors to be elected to the Board of the
corporation at a stockholders meeting is increased effective at
such meeting and there is no public disclosure by the
corporation naming all the nominees proposed by the Board for
the additional directorships at least 100 days in advance
of the first anniversary of the preceding years annual
meeting or in the event of a special meeting of stockholders
called for the purpose of electing directors, a
stockholders notice required by this Section 1.11
shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to
nominees for such additional directorships, if it shall be
delivered to and received by the secretary not later than the
close of business on the tenth day following the day on which
such public disclosure is first made by the corporation.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.2(b), no
person shall be eligible for election by the stockholders as a
director unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set
forth in this Section 1.11. Except as otherwise provided by
law, the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, the
person presiding over the meeting shall, if the facts warrant,
determine and declare at the meeting that a nomination was not
made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by these
Bylaws (including whether the stockholder or beneficial owner,
if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made solicited (or is
part of a group which solicited) or did not so solicit, as the
case may be, proxies in support of such stockholders
nominee in compliance with such stockholders
representation as required by clause (b)(iv) of this
Section 1.11); and if he or she shall so determine, then he
or she shall so declare at the meeting that the defective
nomination shall be disregarded.
1.12 Stockholder
Proposals. (a) At any special meeting of
the stockholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall
have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the
corporations notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto)
given by or at the direction of the Board pursuant to
Section 1.2. At any annual meeting of the stockholders,
only such business (other than nominations of directors, which
must be made in compliance with, and shall be exclusively
governed by Section 1.11) shall be conducted as shall have
been brought before the meeting (i) pursuant to the
corporations notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto)
given by or at the direction of the Board, (ii) otherwise
properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of
the Board, or (iii) by any stockholder of the corporation
who is a stockholder of record at the time of giving of the
notice provided for in this Section 1.12 and at the time of
the meeting, who shall be entitled to vote at such meeting and
who complies with the notice procedures set forth in this
Section 1.12; clause (iii) shall be the exclusive
means for a stockholder to submit such business (other than
matters properly brought under
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act and included in the corporations
notice of meeting) before or at an annual meeting of
stockholders. No stockholder, other than the stockholders
requesting a special meeting pursuant to and in compliance with
Section 1.2(b), shall be permitted to submit business
before or at any Stockholder Requested Special Meeting.
(b) For business properly to be brought before an annual
meeting by a stockholder pursuant to clause (iii) of
paragraph (a), the stockholder must have given timely notice
thereof in proper written form to the secretary of the
corporation and such other business must otherwise be a proper
matter for stockholder action. To be
G-9
timely, a stockholders notice must be delivered to and
received by the secretary at the principal executive offices of
the corporation not less than 90 days nor more than
120 days in advance of the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting; provided, however, that in
the event that (i) no annual meeting was held in the
previous year or (ii) the date of the annual meeting has
been advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than
60 days from the date of the previous years meeting,
notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not
earlier than the opening of business on the 120th day prior
to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business
on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting
or, if later, the tenth day following the day on which public
disclosure (as defined in Section 1.13 hereof) of the date
of the meeting is first made. In no event shall any adjournment
or postponement of a stockholders meeting or the public
disclosure thereof commence a new time period (or extend any
time period) for the giving of a stockholders notice as
described above.
To be in proper written form, such stockholders notice to
the secretary shall set forth in writing (i) as to each
matter the stockholder proposed to bring before the meeting, a
brief description of the business desired to be brought before
the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at such
meeting, and the text of the proposal or business (including the
text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and, in the
event that such business includes a proposal to amend the Bylaws
of the corporation, the language of the proposed amendment),
(ii) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made,
the Proposing Stockholder Information (as defined in
Section 1.13); (iii) any material interest of the
stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the proposal is made; (iv) a description of all agreements,
arrangements and understandings between such stockholder and
beneficial owner, if any, and any other person or persons
(including their names) in connection with the proposal of such
business by the stockholder; (v) a representation that the
stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the corporation,
entitled to vote at such meeting, and intends to appear in
person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business; and
(vi) a representation whether the stockholder or the
beneficial owner, if any, intends, or is or intends to be part
of a group that intends, (A) to deliver a proxy statement
and/or form
of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the
corporations outstanding capital stock required to approve
or adopt the proposal
and/or
(B) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in
support of such proposal. Stockholders proposing to bring
business before the stockholders meeting pursuant to this
Section 1.12 and beneficial owners on whose behalf the
nomination is made shall further update and supplement the
information required under this Section 1.12(b) not later
than 10 days after the record date for the meeting so that
such information shall be true and correct as of the record date.
(c) Notwithstanding anything in the Bylaws to the contrary,
no business (other than the election of directors) shall be
conducted at an annual meeting except in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this Section 1.12 or if it
constitutes an improper subject for stockholder action under
applicable law. The person presiding over an annual meeting
shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare at the
meeting that business was not properly brought before the
meeting in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 1.12 (including whether the stockholder or
beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made
solicited (or is part of a group which solicited) or did not so
solicit, as the case may be, proxies in support of such
stockholders proposal in compliance with such
stockholders representation as required by (b)(vi) of this
Section 1.12, and, if he or she should so determine, he or
she shall so declare at the meeting that any such business not
properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted.
1.13 Public Disclosure; Conduct of Nominations
and Proposals by Stockholders. (a) For
purposes of Sections 1.4(a), 1.11 and 1.12 hereof,
(i) public disclosure shall mean disclosure in
a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service,
Associated Press, Reuters or comparable national news service or
in a document publicly filed by the corporation with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13,
14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and (ii) the term
group shall have the meaning ascribed to such term
under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act.
(b) For purposes of Section 1.11 and 1.12 hereof, the
Proposing Stockholder Information shall mean, as to
the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if
any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, (A) the name and
address, as they appear on the corporations books, of such
stockholder and of such beneficial owner, (B) the class or
series and number of shares of the corporations stock
which are, directly or
G-10
indirectly, owned beneficially and of record, by such
stockholder and such beneficial owner, (C) any option,
warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or
similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or a
settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class
or series of shares of the corporation or with a value derived
in whole or in part from the value of any class or series of
shares of the corporation, whether or not such instrument or
right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or
series of capital stock of the corporation or otherwise (a
Derivative Instrument) directly or indirectly owned
beneficially by such stockholder or beneficial owner and any
other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any
profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of
shares of the corporation, (D) any proxy, contract,
arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which
such stockholder or beneficial owner has a right to vote any
shares of any security of the corporation, (E) any short
interest of such stockholder or beneficial owner in any security
of the corporation (for purposes hereof a person shall be deemed
to have a short interest in a security if such person directly
or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding,
relationship or otherwise, has the opportunity to profit or
share in any profit derived from any decrease in the value of
the subject security), (F) any rights to dividends on the
shares of the corporation owned beneficially by such stockholder
or beneficial owner that are separated or separable from the
underlying shares of the corporation, (G) any proportionate
interest in shares of the corporation or Derivative Instruments
held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited
partnership in which such stockholder or beneficial owner is a
general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an
interest in a general partner, (H) any performance-related
fees (other than an asset-based fee) that such stockholder or
beneficial owner is entitled to based on any increase or
decrease in the value of shares of the corporation or Derivative
Instruments, if any, as of the date of such notice, including
any such interests held by members of such stockholders or
beneficial owners immediate family sharing the same
household (which information shall be supplemented by such
stockholder and beneficial owner not later than 10 days
after the record date for the meeting to disclose such ownership
as of the record date), and (I) any other information
relating to such stockholder and beneficial owner that would be
required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings
required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies
for, as applicable, the proposal
and/or for
the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to
Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of these
Sections 1.11 and 1.12, if the stockholder (or a qualified
representative of the stockholder) does not appear at the annual
meeting of stockholders of the corporation to present a
nomination or business, such nomination shall be disregarded and
such proposed business shall not be transacted, notwithstanding
that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by
the corporation. In order to be considered a qualified
representative of the stockholder for purposes of these Bylaws,
a person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner
of such stockholder or must be authorized by a writing executed
by such stockholder or an electronic transmission delivered by
such stockholder to act for such stockholder as proxy at the
meeting of stockholders, and such person must produce such
writing, or a reliable reproduction of the writing, at the
meeting of stockholders.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of
Sections 1.11 and 1.12, a stockholder shall also comply
with all applicable requirements of law and the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters
set forth in Sections 1.11 and 1.12; provided, however,
that any references in these Bylaws to law and the Exchange Act
or the rules promulgated thereunder are not intended to and
shall not limit the requirements applicable to nominations to be
considered pursuant to Section 1.11 (including
clause (b) thereof) or business proposals to be considered
pursuant to Section 1.12 (including clause (a)(iii)
thereof). Nothing in these Sections 1.11 and 1.12 shall be
deemed to affect any rights (i) of stockholders to request
inclusion of proposals in the corporations proxy statement
pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act or (ii) of the holders of any series
of preferred stock to elect directors under specified
circumstances pursuant to the Certificate of Incorporation.
(e) The provisions of Sections 1.11 and 1.12 shall
also govern what constitutes timely notice for purposes of
Rule 14a-4(c)
of the Exchange Act.
G-11
1.14 Meeting
Required. Whenever the vote of stockholders
at a meeting thereof is required or permitted to be taken for or
in connection with any corporate action, such vote may only be
taken at an annual or special meeting with prior notice, except
as provided in the Certificate of Incorporation.
1.15 Organization. (a) Meetings
of stockholders shall be presided over by the chairman of the
Board, if any, or in his or her absence by the vice chairman of
the Board, if any, or in his or her absence, by the chief
executive officer, if any, or in his or her absence by a
chairman of the meeting, which chairman must be an officer or
director of the corporation and must be designated as chairman
of the meeting by the Board. The secretary, or in his or her
absence an assistant secretary, or in his or her absence a
person whom the person presiding over the meeting shall appoint,
shall act as secretary of the meeting and keep a record of the
proceedings thereof.
(b) The Board shall be entitled to make such rules or
regulations for the conduct of meetings of stockholders as it
shall deem appropriate. Subject to such rules and regulations of
the Board, if any, the person presiding over the meeting shall
have the right and authority to convene and adjourn the meeting,
to prescribe such rules, regulations and procedures and to do
all such acts as, in the judgment of the person presiding over
the meeting, are necessary, appropriate or convenient for the
proper conduct of the meeting, including (i) establishing
an agenda or order of business for the meeting, (ii) rules
and procedures for maintaining order at the meeting and the
safety of those present, including removing any stockholder who
refuses to comply with meeting procedures, rules or guidelines
as established by the person presiding over the meeting;
(iii) limitations on participation in such meeting to
stockholders of record of the corporation and their duly
authorized and constituted proxies and such other persons as the
person presiding over the meeting shall permit,
(iv) restrictions on entry to the meeting after the time
fixed for the commencement thereof, (v) limitations on the
time allotted to questions or comments by participants,
(vi) regulation of the opening and closing of the polls for
balloting, (vii) recessing or adjourning of the meeting,
either by the person presiding over the meeting or the
stockholders by the vote of a majority of the voting power of
the stock, present in person or represented by proxy, and
(viii) regulation of the voting or balloting, as
applicable, including matters which are to be voted on by
ballot, if any. The person presiding over the meeting shall have
sole, absolute and complete authority and discretion to decide
questions of compliance with the foregoing procedures and his or
her ruling thereon shall be final and conclusive. The person
presiding over the meeting, in addition to making any other
determinations that may be appropriate to the conduct of the
meeting, shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare to
the meeting that a matter or business was not properly brought
before the meeting and if the person presiding over the meeting
should so determine and declare, any such matter or business
shall not be transacted or considered. Unless and to the extent
determined by the Board or the person presiding over the
meeting, meetings of stockholders shall not be required to be
held in accordance with rules of parliamentary procedure.
1.16 Inspectors of
Election. Before any meeting of stockholders,
the Board may, and shall if required by law, appoint one or more
inspectors of election, who may be employees of the corporation,
to act at the meeting or its adjournment and to make a written
report thereof. If any person appointed as inspector fails to
appear or fails or refuses to act, then the person presiding
over the meeting may, and upon the request of any stockholder or
a stockholders proxy, shall appoint a person to fill that
vacancy. Such inspectors shall:
(a) determine the number of shares outstanding and the
voting power of each, the number of shares represented at the
meeting, the existence of a quorum, and the authenticity,
validity, and effect of proxies and ballots;
(b) receive votes and ballots, including, if applicable,
votes and ballots submitted by means of electronic transmission;
(c) hear and determine all challenges and questions in any
way arising in connection with the right to vote;
(d) determine when the polls shall close;
(e) determine and retain for a reasonable period a record
of the disposition of any challenges made to any determination
by the inspector or inspectors;
G-12
(f) certify their determination of the number of shares of
the corporation represented at the meeting and such
inspectors count of all votes and ballots, which
certification and report shall specify such other information as
may be required by law; and
(g) do any other acts that may be proper to conduct the
election or vote with fairness to all stockholders.
Each inspector of election shall perform his or her duties
impartially, in good faith, to the best of his or her ability
and as expeditiously as is practical, and before entering upon
the discharge of his or her duties, shall take and sign an oath
to execute faithfully the duties of inspector of election with
strict impartiality and according to the best of his or her
ability. In determining the validity and counting of proxies and
ballots cast at any meeting of stockholders of the corporation,
the inspectors may consider such information as is permitted by
applicable law. If there are three (3) or more inspectors
of election, the decision, act or certificate of a majority is
effective in all respects as the decision, act or certificate of
all. Any report or certificate made by the inspectors of
election is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.
1.17 Election Out of
Section 203. Pursuant to the
corporations original Certificate of Incorporation, the
corporation has expressly elected not to be governed by
Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware.
2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
2.1 Number, Qualification, Election and Term of
Directors. Subject to the provisions of the
General Corporation Law of Delaware and to any limitations in
the Certificate of Incorporation, the business and affairs of
the corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of
the Board. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of
preferred stock, the number of directors may be fixed or changed
from time to time by resolution of a majority of the entire
Board; provided the number shall be no less than seven
(7) and no more than fifteen (15), but no decrease may
shorten the term of any incumbent director. Directors shall be
elected at each annual meeting of stockholders, as provided in
Section 1.5(b), and shall hold office until the next annual
meeting of stockholders and until the election and qualification
of their respective successors, subject to the provisions of
Section 2.9. As used in these Bylaws, the term entire
Board means the total number of directors which the
corporation would have if there were no vacancies on the Board.
2.2 Quorum and Manner of
Acting. (a) A majority of the entire
Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business
at any meeting, except as provided in Section 2.10 of these
Bylaws. In the absence of a quorum a majority of the directors
present may adjourn any meeting from time to time until a quorum
is present. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of
the directors present at a duly held meeting at which a quorum
is present shall be regarded as the act of the Board, subject to
the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and
applicable law.
(b) A meeting at which a quorum is initially present may
continue to transact business notwithstanding the withdrawal of
directors, if any action taken is approved by at least a
majority of the required quorum for that meeting.
2.3 Place of
Meetings. Meetings of the Board may be held
in or outside Delaware.
2.4 Annual and Regular
Meetings. Annual meetings of the Board for
the election of officers and consideration of other matters
shall be held either (a) without notice immediately after
the annual meeting of stockholders and at the same place, or
(b) as soon as practicable after the annual meeting of
stockholders, on notice as provided in Section 2.6 of these
Bylaws. Regular meetings of the Board may be held without notice
and, unless otherwise specified by the Board, shall be held in
accordance with a schedule and at such locations as determined
from time to time by the Board, provided no less than five
(5) such meetings shall be held each year. If the day fixed
for a regular meeting is a legal holiday, the meeting shall be
held on the next business day.
2.5 Special
Meetings. Special meetings of the Board may
be called by the chairman of the board, the chief executive
officer or by a majority of the directors in office.
G-13
2.6 Notice of Meetings; Waiver of
Notice. Notice of the time and place of each
special meeting of the Board, and of each annual meeting not
held immediately after the annual meeting of stockholders and at
the same place, shall be given to each director in advance of
the time set for such meeting as provided herein; provided, that
if the meeting is to be held at the principal executive offices
of the corporation, the notice need not specify the place of the
meeting. Except for amendments to the Bylaws, as provided under
Section 6.9, notice of a special meeting need not state the
purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called and, unless
indicated in the notice thereof, any and all business may be
transacted at a special meeting. Notice need not be given to any
director who submits a signed waiver of notice before or after
the meeting or who attends the meeting without protesting at the
beginning of the meeting the transaction of any business because
the meeting was not lawfully called or convened. Notice of any
adjourned meeting need not be given, other than by announcement
at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken unless the
meeting is adjourned for more than twenty-four (24) hours.
If the meeting is adjourned for more than twenty-four
(24) hours, then notice of the time and place of the
adjourned meeting shall be given before the adjourned meeting
takes place, in the manner specified herein to the directors who
were not present at the time of adjournment. Notice of a special
meeting may be given by any one or more of the following methods
and the method used need not be the same for each director being
notified:
(a) Written notice sent by mail at least three
(3) days prior to the meeting;
(b) Personal service at least twenty-four (24) hours
prior to the time of the meeting;
(c) Telegraphic notice at least twenty-four (24) hours
prior to the time of the meeting, said notice to be sent as a
straight full-rate telegram;
(d) Telephonic notice at least twenty-four (24) hours
prior to the time of the meeting; or
(e) Facsimile, email or other means of electronic
transmission at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the
time of the meeting. Any oral notice given personally or by
telephone may be communicated either to the director or to a
person at the office of the director who the person giving the
notice has reason to believe will promptly communicate it to the
director.
2.7 Board or Committee Action Without a
Meeting. Any action required or permitted to
be taken by the Board or by any committee of the Board may be
taken without a meeting if all of the members of the Board or of
the committee individually or collectively consent in writing or
by electronic transmission to the adoption of a resolution
authorizing the action. Such action by written consent shall
have the same force and affect as a unanimous vote of the Board.
The resolution and the written consents or electronic
transmission or transmissions by the members of the Board or the
committee shall be filed with the minutes of the proceeding of
the Board or of the committee. Such filing shall be in paper
form if the minutes are maintained in paper form and shall be in
electronic form if the minutes are maintained in electronic form.
2.8 Participation in Board or Committee
Meetings by Conference Telephone. Any or all
members of the Board or of any committee of the Board may
participate in a meeting of the Board or of the committee by
means of a conference telephone or other communications
equipment allowing all persons participating in the meeting to
hear each other at the same time. Participation by such means
shall constitute presence in person at the meeting.
2.9 Resignation and Removal of
Directors. Any director may resign at any
time by delivering his or her resignation in writing, including
by means of electronic transmission, to the president or
secretary of the corporation, to take effect at the time when
delivered (unless otherwise specified therein) and the
acceptance of a resignation, unless required by its terms, shall
not be necessary to make it effective. Subject to applicable law
and the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock
with respect to such series of preferred stock, any or all of
the directors may be removed at any time, either with or without
cause, by vote of the holders of a majority of the stock having
voting power and entitled to vote thereon.
2.10 Vacancies. Subject to
applicable law and the rights of the holders of any series of
preferred stock with respect to such series of preferred stock,
and unless the Board otherwise directs, any vacancy in the
Board, including one created by an increase in the authorized
number of directors, may be filled for the
G-14
unexpired term by a majority vote of the remaining directors,
although less than a quorum. No decrease in the number of
authorized directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent
director.
2.11 Compensation. Directors
and members of committees shall receive such compensation as the
Board determines, together with reimbursement of their
reasonable expenses in connection with the performance of their
duties. A director may also be paid for serving the corporation,
its affiliates or subsidiaries in other capacities.
2.12 Notice to Members of the Board of
Directors. Each member of the Board shall
file with the secretary of the corporation an address to which
mail or telegraphic notices shall be sent, a telephone number to
which a telephonic or facsimile notice may be transmitted and,
at the sole discretion of a director, such electronic address to
which other electronic transmissions may be sent. A notice
mailed, telegraphed, telephoned or transmitted by facsimile,
email or other means of electronic transmission in accordance
with the instructions provided by the director shall be deemed
sufficient notice. Such address or telephone number may be
changed at any time and from time to time by a director by
giving written notice of such change to the secretary. Failure
on the part of any director to keep an address and telephone
number on file with the secretary (but not including an address
for other electronic transmissions) shall automatically
constitute a waiver of notice of any regular or special meeting
of the Board which might be held during the period of time that
such address and telephone number are not on file with the
secretary. A notice shall be deemed to be mailed when deposited
in the United States mail, postage prepaid. A notice shall be
deemed to be telegraphed when the notice is delivered to the
transmitter of the telegram and either payment or provision for
payment is made by the corporation. Notice shall be deemed to be
given by telephone if the notice is transmitted over the
telephone to some person (whether or not such person is the
director) or message recording device answering the telephone at
the number which the director has placed on file with the
secretary. Notice shall be deemed to be given by facsimile,
email or other means of electronic transmission when sent to the
telephone number or other address which the director has placed
on file with the secretary.
2.13 Organization. Meetings
of the Board shall be presided over by the chairman of the
Board, if any, or in his or her absence by the vice chairman of
the Board, if any, or in his or her absence by the chief
executive officer, if any, or in his or her absence by the
president, if any. In the absence of all such directors, a
president pro tem chosen by a majority of the directors present
shall preside at the meeting. The secretary shall act as
secretary of the meeting, but in his or her absence the chairman
of the meeting may appoint any person to act as secretary of the
meeting.
2.14 Director Emeritus. The
Board may from time to time elect one or more directors emeritus
(each a Director Emeritus), each of whom shall
serve, at the pleasure of the Board, until the first meeting of
the Board next following the annual meeting of stockholders,
subject to an annual review, or until his or her earlier
resignation or removal by the Board. A Director Emeritus shall
serve as an advisor and consultant to the Board, subject to such
terms and conditions as may be approved by the Board, and may be
appointed by the Board to serve as an advisor and consultant to
one or more committees of the Board. Such Director Emeritus
shall also be available for consultation with management of the
corporation. A Director Emeritus shall have the privilege of
attending meetings of the Board, and meetings of any committee
of the Board for which he or she has been appointed to serve as
an advisor and consultant. A Director Emeritus may participate
in the discussions that occur during the portions of such
meetings which he or she attends. Notice of such meetings to a
Director Emeritus shall not be required under any applicable
law, the Certificate of Incorporation, or these Bylaws. Each
Director Emeritus shall be entitled to receive such compensation
as may be fixed from time to time by the Board. No Director
Emeritus shall be entitled to vote on any business coming before
the Board or any committee of the Board, nor shall he or she be
counted as a member of the Board or any such committee for the
purpose of determining the number of Directors necessary to
constitute a quorum, for the purpose of determining whether a
quorum is present, or for any other purpose whatsoever. In the
case of a Director Emeritus, the occurrence of any event which
in the case of a director would create a vacancy on the Board,
shall be deemed to create a vacancy in such position; but the
Board may declare the position terminated until such time as the
Board shall again deem it proper to create and to fill the
position. A Director Emeritus shall be entitled to
indemnification under these Bylaws to the same extent, and
subject to the same conditions and limitations, as a member of
the Board.
G-15
3. COMMITTEES.
3.1 Audit Committee. The
Board by resolution shall designate an Audit Committee
consisting of three directors or such other number as may be
specified by the Board, which shall review the internal
financial controls of the corporation, and the integrity of its
financial reporting, and have such other powers and duties as
the Board determines. The Board shall adopt a charter, which may
be amended from time to time, setting for the powers and duties
of the Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee shall
serve at the pleasure of the Board. All action of the Audit
Committee shall be reported to the Board at its next meeting.
3.2 Compensation
Committee. The Board by resolution shall
designate a Compensation Committee consisting of three directors
or such other number as may be specified by the Board, which
shall administer the corporations compensation plans and
have such other powers and duties as the Board determines. The
members of the Compensation Committee shall serve at the
pleasure of the Board. All action of the Compensation Committee
shall be reported to the Board at its next meeting. The Board
shall adopt a charter, which may be amended from time to time,
setting forth the powers and duties of the Compensation
Committee.
3.3 Corporate Governance
Committee. The Board by resolution shall
designate a Corporate Governance Committee consisting of three
directors or such other number as may be specified by the Board,
which shall nominate candidates for election to the Board and
have such other powers and duties as the Board determines. The
members of the Corporate Governance Committee shall serve at the
pleasure of the Board. All action of the Corporate Governance
Committee shall be reported to the Board at its next meeting.
The Board shall adopt a Charter, which may be amended from time
to time, setting forth the powers and duties of the Corporate
Governance Committee.
3.4 Other Committees. The
Board, by resolution adopted by a majority of the entire Board,
may designate other committees of directors of one or more
directors, which shall serve at the Boards pleasure and
have such powers and duties as the Board determines.
3.5 Meetings and Action of
Committees. (a) The Board may designate
one or more directors as alternate members of any committee
(other than the Audit Committee), who may replace any absent or
disqualified member at any meeting of the committee. Each
committee shall keep regular minutes of its meetings and report
the same to the Board at its next meeting. Each committee may
adopt rules of procedure and shall meet as provided by those
rules or by resolutions of the Board.
(b) Meetings and actions of committees shall be governed
by, and held and taken in accordance with, the provisions of
Article 2 of these Bylaws, including Section 2.2
(quorum and manner of acting), Section 2.3 (place of
meetings), Section 2.4 (annual and regular meetings),
Section 2.5 (special meetings), 2.6 (notice of meetings and
waiver of notice), Section 2.7 (board or committee action
without a meeting), Section 2.8 (participation in board or
committee meetings by conference telephone), Section 2.12
(notice to members of the board of directors), and
Section 2.13 (organization), with such changes in the
context of those Bylaws as are necessary to substitute the
committee and its members for the board of directors and its
members; provided, however, (i) that the time of regular
meetings of committees may be determined either by resolution of
the Board or by resolution of the committee, (ii) that
special meetings of committees may also be called by resolution
of the Board, (iii) that notice of special meetings of
committees shall also be given to all alternate members, who
shall have the right to attend all meetings of the committee;
(iv) that a majority of the members of a committee shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any
meeting; and (v) that the affirmative vote of a majority of
the members of a committee shall be required to take action in
respect of any matter presented to or requiring the approval of
the committee.
3.6 Election Pursuant to
Section 141(c)(2). By resolution of the
Board, the corporation has elected pursuant to
Section 141(c) of the General Corporation Law of Delaware
to be governed by paragraph (2) of Section 141(c) in
respect of committees of the Board.
G-16
4. OFFICERS.
4.1 Number; Security. The
executive officers of the corporation shall consist of a chief
executive officer, a president, one or more vice presidents
(including executive vice president(s) and senior vice
president(s) if the Board so determines), a secretary and a
treasurer and a chief financial officer who shall be chosen by
the Board and such other officers, including but not limited to
a chairman of the Board, a vice chairman of the Board, as the
Board shall deem expedient, who shall be chosen in such manner
and hold their offices for such terms as the Board may
prescribe. Any two or more offices may be held by the same
person. Either the chairman of the Board or the president, as
the Board may designate from time to time, may be the chief
executive officer of the corporation. The Board may from time to
time designate the president or any executive vice president as
the chief operating officer of the corporation. Any vice
president, treasurer or assistant treasurer, or assistant
secretary, respectively, may exercise any of the powers of the
president, the chief financial officer, or the secretary,
respectively, as directed by the Board and shall perform such
other duties as are imposed upon such officer by the Bylaws or
the Board. The Board may require any officer, agent or employee
to give security for the faithful performance of his duties.
4.2 Election; Term of Office;
Salaries. The term of office and salary of
each of the officers of the corporation and the manner and time
of the payment of such salaries shall be fixed and determined by
the Board and may be altered by said Board from time to time at
its pleasure, subject to the rights, if any, of said officers
under any contract of employment; provided, that the Board may
designate such responsibilities to the Compensation Committee
and may also authorize the chief executive officer or the
president to establish the salaries of officers appointed
pursuant to Section 4.3.
4.3 Subordinate
Officers. The Board may appoint subordinate
officers (including assistant secretaries and assistant
treasurers), agents or employees, each of whom shall hold office
for such period and have such powers and duties as the Board
determines. The Board may delegate to any executive officer or
to any committee the power to appoint and define the powers and
duties of any subordinate officers, agents or employees.
4.4 Resignation and Removal of
Officers. Any officer may resign at any time
by delivering his resignation in writing to the chief executive
officer, president or secretary of the corporation, to take
effect at the time specified in the resignation; the acceptance
of a resignation, unless required by its terms, shall not be
necessary to make it effective. Any officer elected or appointed
by the Board or appointed by an executive officer or by a
committee may be removed by the Board either with or without
cause, and in the case of an officer appointed by an executive
officer or by a committee, by the officer or committee who
appointed him or her or by the president.
4.5 Vacancies. A vacancy in
any office may be filled for the unexpired term in the manner
prescribed in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of these Bylaws for
election or appointment to the office.
4.6 Chairman of the
Board. The chairman of the Board, if any,
shall preside at meetings of the stockholders and the Board and
exercise and perform such other powers and duties as may from
time to time be assigned to him by the Board or as may be
prescribed by these Bylaws. The chairman of the Board shall
report to the Board.
4.7 Vice Chairman of the
Board. The vice chairman of the Board, if
there shall be one, shall, in the case of the absence,
disability or death of the chairman of the Board, exercise all
the powers and perform all the duties of the chairman of the
Board. The vice chairman shall have such other powers and
perform such other duties as may be granted or prescribed by the
Board.
4.8 Chief Executive
Officer. Subject to the control of the Board,
the chief executive officer of the corporation shall have
general supervision, direction and control over the business of
the corporation. The chief executive officer shall have such
powers and be subject to such duties as the Board may from time
to time prescribe. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, the chief executive officer shall have the power,
which he may delegate to other officers of the corporation, to
affix the signature of the corporation to all deeds,
conveyances, mortgages, leases, obligations, bonds, certificates
and other papers and instruments in writing which have been
authorized by the Board or which, in the judgment of the chief
executive officer,
G-17
should be executed on behalf of the corporation, and to sign
certificates for shares of capital stock of the corporation.
4.9 President. The powers
and duties of the president are:
(a) To affix the signature of the corporation to all deeds,
conveyances, mortgages, leases, obligations, bonds, certificates
and other papers and instruments in writing which have been
authorized by the Board or which, in the judgment of the
president, should be executed on behalf of the corporation, and
to sign certificates for shares of capital stock of the
corporation.
(b) To have such other powers and be subject to such other
duties as the Board may from time to time prescribe.
4.10 Vice President. In case
of the absence, disability or death of the president, the
elected vice president, or one of the elected vice presidents,
shall exercise all the powers and perform all the duties of the
president. If there is more than one elected vice president, the
order in which the elected vice presidents shall succeed to the
powers and duties of the president shall be as fixed by the
Board. The elected vice president or elected vice presidents
shall have such other powers and perform such other duties as
may be granted or prescribed by the Board.
Vice presidents appointed pursuant to Section 4.3 shall
have such powers and duties as may be fixed by the chairman of
the Board or president, except that such appointed vice
presidents may not exercise the powers and duties of the
president. Each vice president shall have such powers and duties
as the Board or the president assigns to him or her.
4.11 Secretary. The powers
and duties of the secretary are:
(a) To keep a book of minutes at the principal office of
the corporation, or such other place as the Board may order, of
all meetings of its directors and stockholders with the time and
place of holding, whether regular or special, and, if special,
how authorized, the notice thereof given, the names of those
present at directors meetings, the number of shares
present or represented at stockholders meetings and the
proceedings thereof.
(b) To keep the seal of the corporation, if any, and affix
the same, if any, to all instruments which may require it.
(c) To keep or cause to be kept at the principal office of
the corporation, or at the office of the transfer agent or
agents, a share register, or duplicate share registers, showing
the names of the stockholders and their addresses, the number of
and classes of shares, and the number and date of cancellation
of every certificate surrendered for cancellation.
(d) To keep a supply of certificates for shares of the
corporation, to fill in all certificates issued, and to make a
proper record of each such issuance; provided, that so long as
the corporation shall have one or more duly appointed and acting
transfer agents of the shares, or any class or series of shares,
of the corporation, such duties with respect to such shares
shall be performed by such transfer agent or transfer agents.
(e) To transfer upon the share books of the corporation any
and all shares of the corporation; provided, that so long as the
corporation shall have one or more duly appointed and acting
transfer agents of the shares, or any class or series of shares,
of the corporation, such duties with respect to such shares
shall be performed by such transfer agent or transfer agents,
and the method of transfer of each certificate shall be subject
to the reasonable regulations of the transfer agent to which the
certificate is presented for transfer, and also, if the
corporation then has one or more duly appointed and acting
registrars, to the reasonable regulations of the registrar to
which the new certificate is presented for registration; and
provided, further that no certificate for shares of stock shall
be issued or delivered or, if issued or delivered, shall have
any validity whatsoever until and unless it has been signed or
authenticated in the manner provided in Section 5.1 hereof.
G-18
(f) To make service and publication of all notices that may
be necessary or proper, and without command or direction from
anyone. In case of the absence, disability, refusal, or neglect
of the secretary to make service or publication of any notices,
then such notices may be served
and/or
published by the president or a vice president, or by any person
thereunto authorized by either of them or by the board of
directors or by the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of the corporation.
(g) To sign certificates for shares of capital stock of the
corporation.
(h) Generally to do and perform all such duties as pertain
to the office of secretary and as may be required by the Board.
4.12 Treasurer. The
treasurer shall be or shall be under the direction of the chief
financial officer of the corporation, and shall be in charge of
the corporations books and accounts. Subject to the
control of the Board, he or she shall have such other powers and
duties as the Board or the president assigns to him or her.
4.13 Chief Financial
Officer. The powers and duties of the chief
financial officer are:
(a) To supervise the corporate-wide treasury functions and
financial reporting to external bodies.
(b) To have the custody of all funds, securities, evidence
of indebtedness and other valuable documents of the corporation
and, at the chief financial officers discretion, to cause
any or all thereof to be deposited for account of the
corporation at such depositary as may be designated from time to
time by the Board.
(c) To receive or cause to be received, and to give or
cause to be given, receipts and acquittances for monies paid in
for the account of the corporation.
(d) To disburse, or cause to be disbursed, all funds of the
corporation as may be directed by the Board, taking proper
vouchers for such disbursements.
(e) To render to the chief executive officer and president,
and to the Board, whenever they may require, accounts of all
transactions and of the financial condition of the corporation.
(f) Generally to do and perform all such duties as pertain
to the office of chief financial officer and as may be required
by the Board.
5. SHARES.
5.1 Shares of the
Corporation. The shares of the corporation
shall be represented by certificates, provided that the Board
may provide by resolution or resolutions that some or all of any
or all classes or series of its stock shall be uncertificated
shares. Any such resolution shall not apply to shares
represented by a certificate until such certificate is
surrendered to the corporation. Notwithstanding the adoption of
such a resolution by the Board of Directors, every holder of
stock represented by certificates and upon request every holder
of uncertificated shares shall be entitled to have a certificate
signed by, or in the name of the corporation by the chairman or
vice chairman of the board of directors or by the president or a
vice-president, and by the secretary or an assistant secretary,
or the treasurer or an assistant treasurer, representing the
number of shares registered in certificate form. The signatures
of any such officers thereon may be facsimiles. The seal of the
corporation shall be impressed, by original or by facsimile,
printed or engraved, on all such certificates. The certificate
shall also be signed by the transfer agent and a registrar and
the signature of either the transfer agent or the registrar may
also be facsimile, engraved or printed. In case any officer,
transfer agent, or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile
signature has been placed upon any such certificate shall have
ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before
such certificate is issued, such certificate may nevertheless be
issued by the corporation with the same effect as if such
officer, transfer agent, or registrar had not ceased to be such
officer, transfer agent, or registrar at the date of its issue.
5.2 Special Designation on
Certificates. If the corporation is
authorized to issue more than one class of stock or more than
one series of any class, then the powers, the designations, the
preferences, and the relative, participating, optional or other
special rights or each class of stock or series thereof and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences
and/or
rights shall be set forth in full or
G-19
summarized on the face or back of the certificate that the
corporation shall issue to represent such class or series of
stock; provided, however, that, except as otherwise provided in
Section 202 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, in
lieu of the foregoing requirements there may be set forth on the
face or back of the certificate that the corporation shall issue
to represent such class or series of stock a statement that the
corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who
so requests the powers, the designations, the preferences, and
the relative, participating, optional or other special rights of
each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences
and/or
rights.
5.3 Lost, Stolen, Destroyed and Mutilated
Certificates. The owner of any stock of the
corporation shall immediately notify the corporation of any
loss, theft, destruction or mutilation of any certificate
therefor, and the corporation may issue uncertificated shares or
a new certificate for stock in the place of any certificate
theretofore issued by it and alleged to have been lost, stolen
or destroyed, and the Board may, in its discretion, require the
owner of the lost, stolen or destroyed certificate or his or her
legal representatives to give the corporation a bond in such
sum, limited or unlimited, and in such form and with such surety
or sureties, as the Board shall in its uncontrolled discretion
determine, to indemnify the corporation against any claim that
may be made against it on account of the alleged loss, theft or
destruction of any such certificate, or the issuance of any such
new certificate or uncertificated shares. The Board may,
however, in its discretion refuse to issue any such new
certificate or uncertificated shares except pursuant to legal
proceedings under the laws of the State of Delaware in such case
made and provided.
5.4 Stock Records. The
corporation or a transfer agent shall keep stock books in which
shall be recorded the number of shares issued, the names of the
owners of the shares, the number owned by them respectively,
whether such shares are represented by certificates or are
uncertificated, and the transfer of such shares with the date of
transfer.
5.5 Transfers. Transfers of
stock shall be made only on the stock transfer record of the
corporation upon surrender of the certificate or certificates
being transferred which certificate shall be properly endorsed
for transfer or accompanied by a duly executed stock power,
except in the case of uncertificated shares, for which the
transfer shall be made only upon receipt of transfer
documentation reasonably acceptable to the corporation. Whenever
a certificate is endorsed by or accompanied by a stock power
executed by someone other than the person or persons named in
the certificate, or the transfer documentation for the
uncertificated shares is executed by someone other than the
holder of record thereof, evidence of authority to transfer same
shall also be submitted with the certificate or transfer
documentation. All certificates surrendered to the corporation
for transfer shall be canceled.
5.6 Regulations Governing Issuance and
Transfers of Shares. The Board shall have the
power and authority to make all such rules and regulations as it
shall deem expedient concerning the issue, transfer and
registration of shares of stock of the corporation.
5.7 Transfer Agents and
Registrars. The Board may appoint, or
authorize one or more officers to appoint, one or more transfer
agents and one or more registrars.
5.8 Record Date for Purposes Other than Notice
and Voting. For purposes of determining the
stockholders entitled to receive payment of any dividend or
other distribution or allotment of any rights or the
stockholders entitled to exercise any rights in respect of any
other lawful action, the Board may fix a record date, which
record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution
fixing the record date is adopted and which shall not be more
than sixty (60) days before any such action. In that case,
only stockholders of record at the close of business on the date
so fixed are entitled to receive the dividend, distribution or
allotment of rights, or to exercise such rights, as the case may
be, notwithstanding any transfer of any shares on the books of
the corporation after the record date so fixed, except as
otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, by these
Bylaws, by agreement or by law. If the Board does not so fix a
record date, then the record date for determining stockholders
for any such purpose shall be at the close of business on the
day on which the Board adopts the applicable resolution.
G-20
6. MISCELLANEOUS.
6.1 Seal. The Board may
adopt a corporate seal, which shall be in the form of a circle
and shall bear the corporations name and the year and
state in which it was incorporated.
6.2 Fiscal Year. The Board
may determine the corporations fiscal year. Until changed
by the Board, the corporations fiscal year shall be the
calendar year.
6.3 Voting of Shares in Other
Corporations. Shares in other corporations
which are held by the corporation may be represented and voted
by the president or a vice president of this corporation or by
proxy or proxies appointed by one of them. The Board may,
however, appoint some other person to vote the shares.
6.4 Checks; Drafts; Evidences of
Indebtedness. From time to time, the Board
shall determine by resolution which person or persons may sign
or endorse all checks, drafts, other orders for payment of
money, notes or other evidences of indebtedness that are issued
in the name of or payable to the corporation, and only the
persons so authorized shall sign or endorse those instruments.
6.5 Corporate Contracts and Instruments; How
Executed. The Board, except as otherwise
provided in these Bylaws, may authorize any officer or officers,
or agent or agents, to enter into any contract or execute any
instrument in the name of and on behalf of the corporation; such
authority may be general or confined to specific instances.
Unless so authorized or ratified by the Board or within the
agency power of an officer, no officer, agent or employee shall
have any power or authority to bind the corporation by any
contract or engagement or to pledge its credit or to render it
liable for any purpose or for any amount.
6.6 Construction;
Definitions. Unless the context requires
otherwise, the general provisions, rules of construction, and
definitions in the General Corporation Law of Delaware shall
govern the construction of these Bylaws. Without limiting the
generality of this provision, the singular number includes the
plural, the plural number includes the singular, the term
person includes both a corporation and a natural
person, and the masculine gender includes the feminine gender
and vice versa. Whenever the words include,
includes or including are used in these
Bylaws they shall be deemed to be followed by the words
without limitation.
6.7 Provisions Additional to Provisions of
Law. All restrictions, limitations,
requirements and other provisions of these Bylaws shall be
construed, insofar as possible, as supplemental and additional
to all provisions of law applicable to the subject matter
thereof and shall be fully complied with in addition to the said
provisions of law unless such compliance shall be illegal.
6.8 Provisions Contrary to Provisions of
Law. Any article, section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of these Bylaws which
upon being construed in the manner provided in Section 6.7
hereof, shall be contrary to or inconsistent with any applicable
provisions of law, shall not apply so long as said provisions of
law shall remain in effect, but such result shall not affect the
validity or applicability of any other portions of these Bylaws,
it being hereby declared that these Bylaws would have been
adopted and each article, section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact
that any one or more articles, sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases is or are illegal.
6.9 Amendments. Bylaws may
be amended, repealed or adopted by a majority of the entire
Board, provided that written notice of any such proposed action
shall have been given to each director prior to such meeting, or
that notice of such addition, amendment, alteration or report
shall have been given at the preceding meeting of the Board. The
Bylaws may also be amended, repealed or adopted by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting
power of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote
thereon; provided, however, that in the case of any such
stockholder action at a special meeting of stockholders, notice
of the proposed alteration, repeal or adoption of the new Bylaw
or Bylaws must be contained in the notice of such special
meeting.
Whenever an amendment or new bylaw is adopted, it shall be
copied in the book of bylaws with the original bylaws, in the
appropriate place. If any bylaw is repealed, the fact of repeal
with the date of the meeting at which the repeal was enacted or
the filing of the operative written consent(s) shall be stated
in said book.
G-21
6.10 Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) Generally.
(1) The corporation shall indemnify any person who was or
is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was or has agreed to
serve at the request of the corporation as a director or officer
of the corporation, or is or was serving or has agreed to serve
at the request of the corporation as a director or officer
(which, for purposes hereof, shall include a trustee or similar
capacity)of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, or by reason
of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in such
capacity.
(2) The corporation may indemnify any person who was or is
a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact
that he or she is or was or has agreed to serve at the request
of the corporation as an employee or agent of the corporation,
or is or was serving or has agreed to serve at the request of
the corporation as an employee or agent of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise, or by reason of any action alleged to have
been taken or omitted in such capacity.
(3) The indemnification provided by this
subsection (a) shall be from and against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the
indemnitee or on his or her behalf in connection with such
action, suit or proceeding and any appeal therefrom, but shall
only be provided if the indemnitee acted in good faith and in a
manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any
criminal action, suit or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
(4) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
subsection (a), in the case of an action or suit by or in the
right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor
(i) the indemnification provided by this
subsection (a) shall be limited to expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such
person in the defense or settlement of such action or suit, and
(ii) no indemnification shall be made in respect of any
claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been
adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless, and only to the
extent that, the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in
which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon
application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in
view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly
and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the
Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
(5) The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by
judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo
contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a
presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a
manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable
cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.
(b) Successful Defense. To
the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent, or
former officer or director of the corporation has been
successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action,
suit or proceeding referred to in subsection (a) hereof or
in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he or she
shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys
fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in
connection therewith. If a director or officer or former officer
or director is not wholly successful, on the merits or
otherwise, in any action, suit or proceeding but is successful,
on the merits or otherwise, as to any claim, issue or matter in
such action, suit or proceeding, the corporation shall indemnify
such person against all expenses (including attorneys
fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person or on his
or her behalf relating to each successfully resolved claim,
issue or matter. For purposes of this Section 6.10 and
without limitation, the termination of a claim, issue or matter
in an action, suit or proceeding by dismissal, with or without
prejudice, shall be deemed to be a successful result as to such
claim, issue or matter.
G-22
(c) Determination That Indemnification Is
Proper. Any indemnification of a person
entitled to indemnity under subsection (a)(1) hereof shall
(unless otherwise ordered by a court) be made by the corporation
unless a determination is made that indemnification of such
person is not proper in the circumstances because he or she has
not met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in
subsection (a)(3) hereof. Any indemnification of a person
entitled to indemnity under subsection (a)(2) hereof may (unless
otherwise ordered by a court) be made by the corporation upon a
determination that indemnification of such person is proper in
the circumstances because he or she has met the applicable
standard of conduct set forth in subsection (a)(3) hereof. Any
such determination shall be made (i) by a majority vote of
the directors who are not parties to such action, suit or
proceeding, even if less than a quorum, or (ii) if there
are no such directors, or if such directors so direct, by
independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (iii) by
the stockholders.
(d) Advance Payment of Expenses; Notification
and Defense of Claim.
(i) Expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred by a
director or officer in defending a threatened or pending civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or
proceeding shall be paid by the corporation in advance of the
final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon
receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or
officer to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be
determined that he or she is not entitled to be indemnified by
the corporation as authorized in this Section. Such expenses
(including attorneys fees) incurred by other employees and
agents may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if any, as
the Board of Directors deems appropriate. Such expenses
(including attorneys fees) incurred by former directors
and officers may be so paid upon such terms and conditions, if
any, as the corporation deems appropriate.
(ii) Promptly after receipt by a director, officer,
employee or agent of notice of the commencement of any action,
suit or proceeding, such person shall, if a claim thereof is to
be made against the corporation hereunder, notify the
corporation of the commencement thereof. The failure to promptly
notify the corporation will not relieve the corporation from any
liability that it may have to such person hereunder, except to
the extent the corporation is prejudiced in its defense of such
action, suit or proceeding as a result of such failure.
(iii) The Board of Directors may authorize the
corporations counsel to represent a director, officer,
employee or agent in any action, suit or proceeding, whether or
not the corporation is a party to such action, suit or
proceeding. In the event the corporation shall be obligated to
pay the expenses of any person with respect to an action, suit
or proceeding, as provided in this Section 6.10, the
corporation, if appropriate, shall be entitled to assume the
defense of such action, suit or proceeding, with counsel
reasonably acceptable to such person, upon the delivery to such
person of written notice of its election to do so. After
delivery of such notice, approval of such counsel by such person
and the retention of such counsel by the corporation, the
corporation will not be liable to such person under this
Section 6.10 for any fees of counsel subsequently incurred
by such person with respect to the same action, suit or
proceeding, provided that (i) the director, officer,
employee or agent shall have the right to employ his or her
counsel in such action, suit or proceeding at such persons
expense and (b) if (i) the employment of counsel by
such person has been previously authorized in writing by the
corporation, (ii) counsel to the director, officer,
employee or agent shall have reasonably concluded that there may
be a conflict of interest or position on any significant issue
between the corporation and such person in the conduct of any
such defense or (iii) the corporation shall not, in fact,
have employed counsel to assume the defense of such action, suit
or proceeding, then the fees and expenses of such persons
counsel shall be at the expense of the corporation.
(iv) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Section 6.10 to the contrary, to the extent that any
director or officer is, by reason of his or her corporate
status, a witness or otherwise participates in any action, suit
or proceeding at a time when such person is not a party in the
action, suit or proceeding, the corporation shall indemnify such
person against all expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by such person or on his or her
behalf in connection therewith.
(e) Procedure for Indemnification of Required
Indemnitees. Any indemnification of a person
the corporation is required to indemnify under
subsection (a) hereof, or advance of costs, charges and
expenses of a person the corporation is required to pay under
subsection (d) hereof, shall be made promptly, and in any
event within 60 days, upon the written request of such
person. If the corporation fails to respond within
G-23
60 days, then the request for indemnification shall be
deemed to be approved. The right to indemnification or advances
as granted by this Section 6.10 shall be enforceable by the
person the corporation is required to indemnify under
subsection (a) hereof in any court of competent
jurisdiction if the corporation denies such request, in whole or
in part. Such persons costs and expenses incurred in
connection with successfully establishing his or her right to
indemnification, in whole or in part, in any such action shall
also be indemnified by the corporation. It shall be a defense to
any such action (other than an action brought to enforce a claim
for the advance of costs, charges and expenses under
subsection (d) hereof where the required undertaking, if
any, has been received by the corporation) that the claimant has
not met the standard of conduct set forth in subsection (a)
hereof, but the burden of proving such defense shall be on the
corporation. Neither the failure of the corporation (including
its Board of Directors, its independent legal counsel, and its
stockholders) to have made a determination prior to the
commencement of such action that indemnification of the claimant
is proper in the circumstances because he or she has met the
applicable standard of conduct set forth in subsection (a)
hereof, nor the fact that there has been an actual determination
by the corporation (including its Board of Directors, its
independent legal counsel, and its stockholders) that the
claimant has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall
be a defense to the action or create a presumption that the
claimant has not met the applicable standard of conduct.
A director or officer shall be presumed to be entitled to
indemnification under this Section 6.10 upon submission of
a request for indemnification pursuant to this subsection (e),
and the corporation shall have the burden of proof in overcoming
that presumption in reaching a determination contrary to that
presumption. Such presumption shall be used as a basis for a
determination of entitlement to indemnification unless the
corporation provides information sufficient to overcome such
presumption by clear and convincing evidence.
(f) Survival; Preservation of Other
Rights. The provisions of this
Section 6.10 shall be deemed to be a contract between the
corporation and each director, officer, employee and agent who
serves in such capacity at any time while these provisions as
well as the relevant provisions of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware are in effect and any repeal or
modification thereof shall not affect any right or obligation
then existing with respect to any state of facts then or
previously existing or any action, suit, or proceeding
previously or thereafter brought or threatened based in whole or
in part upon any such state of facts. Such a contract
right may not be modified retroactively without the
consent of such director, officer, employee or agent. The
indemnification provided by this Section 6.10 shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified
may be entitled under any Bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders
or disinterested directors or otherwise, both as to action in
his or her official capacity and as to action in another
capacity while holding such office, and shall continue as to a
person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or
agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and
administrators of such a person.
(g) Indemnification
Agreements. Without limiting the provisions
of this Section 6.10, the corporation is authorized from
time to time, without further action by the stockholders of the
corporation, to enter into agreements with any director,
officer, employee or agent of the corporation providing such
rights of indemnification as the corporation may deem
appropriate, up to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any
agreement entered into by the corporation with a director may be
authorized by the other directors, and such authorization shall
not be invalid on the basis that similar agreements may have
been or may thereafter be entered into with other directors.
(h) Insurance and Subrogation.
(i) The corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on
behalf of any person who is or was or has agreed to serve at the
request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or
agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of
the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee
benefit plan or other enterprise against any liability asserted
against, and incurred by, him or her or on his or her behalf in
any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such,
whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify
him or her against such liability under the provisions of this
Section 6.10.
(ii) In the event of any payment by the corporation under
this Section 6.10, the corporation shall be subrogated to
the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of
such person, who shall execute all
G-24
papers required and take all action necessary to secure such
rights, including execution of such documents as are necessary
to enable the corporation to bring suit to enforce such rights
in accordance with the terms of such insurance policy.
(iii) The corporation shall not be liable under this
Section 6.10 to make any payment of amounts otherwise
indemnifiable hereunder (including, but not limited to,
judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties, and amounts
paid in settlement) if and to the extent that such person has
otherwise actually received such payment under the Certificate
of Incorporation or these Bylaws or any insurance policy,
contract, agreement or otherwise.
(i) Certain Definitions. For
purposes of this Section 6.10, references to the
corporation shall include, in addition to the resulting
corporation, any constituent corporation (including any
constituent of a constituent) absorbed in a consolidation or
merger which, if its separate existence had continued, would
have had power and authority to indemnify its directors,
officers, employees or agents so that any person who is or was a
director, officer employee or agent of such constituent
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such
constituent corporation as a director, officer, employee or
agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise, shall stand in the
same position under the provisions of this Section 6.10
with respect to the resulting or surviving corporation as he or
she would have with respect to such constituent corporation if
its separate existence had continued. For purposes of this
Section 6.10, references to fines shall include
any excise taxes assessed on a person with respect to an
employee benefit plan; and references to serving at the
request of the corporation shall include any service as a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation which
imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director or
officer with respect to an employee benefit plan, its
participants or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good
faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in
the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of an
employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation
as referred to in this Section 6.10. For purposes of any
determination under this Section 6.10, a person shall be
deemed to have acted in good faith and in a manner
such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the
best interests of the corporation, or, with respect to any
criminal action or proceeding, to have had no reasonable cause
to believe such persons conduct was unlawful, if such
persons action is based on the records or books of account
of the corporation or another enterprise, or on information
supplied to such person by the officers of the corporation or
another enterprise in the course of their duties, or on the
advice of legal counsel for the corporation or another
enterprise or on information or records given or reports made to
the corporation or another enterprise by an independent
certified public accountant or by an appraiser or other expert
selected with reasonable care by the corporation or another
enterprise. The provisions of this Section 6.10(i) shall
not be deemed to be exclusive or to limit in any way the
circumstances in which a person may be deemed to have met the
applicable standard of conduct set forth in
Section 6.10(a)(3) of this Section 6.10, as the case
may be.
(j) Limitation on
Indemnification. Notwithstanding any other
provision herein to the contrary, the corporation shall not be
obligated pursuant to these Bylaws:
(i) To indemnify or advance expenses to a director,
officer, employee or agent with respect to proceedings (or part
thereof) initiated by such person, except with respect to
proceedings brought to establish or enforce a right to
indemnification (which shall be governed by the provisions of
this Section 6.10), unless such proceeding (or part
thereof) was authorized or consented to by the Board of
Directors of the corporation.
(ii) To indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent
for any expenses incurred by such person with respect to any
proceeding instituted by such person to enforce or interpret
these Bylaws, if a court of competent jurisdiction determines
that each of the material assertions made by such person in such
proceedings was not made in good faith or was frivolous;
(iii) To indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent
for expenses or the payment of profits arising from the purchase
and sale by such person of securities in violation of
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or any similar successor statute.
G-25
(k) Certain Settlement
Provisions. The corporation shall have no
obligation to indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent
under this Section 6.10 for amounts paid in settlement of
any action, suit or proceeding without the corporations
prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
The corporation shall not settle any action, suit or proceeding
in any manner that would impose any fine or other obligation on
any director or officer or employee or agent without such
persons prior written consent.
(l) Savings Clause. If this
Section 6.10 or any portion hereof shall be invalidated on
any ground by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the
corporation shall nevertheless indemnify each director or
officer and may indemnify each employee or agent of the
corporation as to costs, charges and expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement with respect to any action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative,
including an action by or in the right of the corporation, to
the full extent permitted by any applicable portion of this
Section 6.10 that shall not have been invalidated and to
the full extent permitted by applicable law.
(m) Contribution. In order
to provide for just and equitable contribution in circumstances
in which the indemnification provided for herein is held by a
court of competent jurisdiction to be unavailable to a director
or officer in whole or in part, it is agreed that, in such
event, the corporation shall contribute to the payment of such
directors or officers costs, charges and expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement with respect to any action, suit or
proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, but not including an action by or in the right of
the corporation, in an amount that is just and equitable in the
circumstances, taking into account, among other things,
contributions by other directors and officers of the corporation
or others pursuant to indemnification agreements or otherwise;
provided, that, without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, such contribution shall not be required where such
holding by the court is due to (i) the failure of such
director or officer to meet the standard of conduct set forth in
subsection (a) hereof, or (ii) any limitation on
indemnification set forth in subsection (h)(iii), (j) or
(k) hereof.
(n) Form and Delivery of
Communications. Any notice, request or other
communication required or permitted to be given to the
corporation under this Section 6.10 shall be in writing and
either delivered in person or sent by telecopy, telex, telegram,
overnight mail or courier service, or certified or registered
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the General
Counsel or secretary of the corporation at its principal
executive offices.
(o) Subsequent
Legislation. If the General Corporation Law
of Delaware is amended after adoption of this Section 6.10
to expand further the indemnification permitted to directors or
officers, then the corporation shall indemnify such persons to
the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of
Delaware, as so amended.
G-26
Annex H
GENERAL
CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
§
262. APPRAISAL RIGHTS
(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who
holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand
pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to
such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the
effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise
complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has
neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor
consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this
title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery
of the fair value of the stockholders shares of stock
under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and
(c) of this section. As used in this section, the word
stockholder means a holder of record of stock in a
corporation; the words stock and share
mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words; and
the words depository receipt mean a receipt or other
instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in 1
or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a
corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of
any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a
merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to
§ 251(g) of this title), § 252,
§ 254, § 255, § 256,
§ 257, § 258, § 263 or
§ 264 of this title:
(1) Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this
section shall be available for the shares of any class or series
of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect
thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of the meeting of stockholders to act
upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either
(i) listed on a national securities exchange or
(ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further
provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any
shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a
merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote
of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in
§ 251(f) of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent
corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of
an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to
§§ 251, 252, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 263 and 264
of this title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or
resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository
receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or
depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts
at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be
either listed on a national securities exchange or held of
record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing paragraphs
(b)(2)a. and b. of this section; or
d. Any combination of the shares of stock, depository
receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional
depository receipts described in the foregoing paragraphs
(b)(2)a., b. and c. of this section.
(3) In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware
corporation party to a merger effected under § 253 or
§ 267 of this title is not owned by the parent
immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be
available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
(c) Any corporation may provide in its certificate of
incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be
available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as
a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation,
any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a
constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of
incorporation contains such a
H-1
provision, the procedures of this section, including those set
forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section,
shall apply as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If a proposed merger or consolidation for which
appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be
submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting,
shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record
date for notice of such meeting (or such members who received
notice in accordance with § 255(c) of this title) with
respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available
pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) of this section that
appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of
the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a
copy of this section and, if 1 of the constituent corporations
is a nonstock corporation, a copy of § 114 of this
title. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of such
stockholders shares shall deliver to the corporation,
before the taking of the vote on the merger or consolidation, a
written demand for appraisal of such stockholders shares.
Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the
corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the
stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such
stockholders shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or
consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder
electing to take such action must do so by a separate written
demand as herein provided. Within 10 days after the
effective date of such merger or consolidation, the surviving or
resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each
constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection
and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or
consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has
become effective; or
(2) If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to
§ 228, § 253, or § 267 of this
title, then either a constituent corporation before the
effective date of the merger or consolidation or the surviving
or resulting corporation within 10 days thereafter shall
notify each of the holders of any class or series of stock of
such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal
rights of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that
appraisal rights are available for any or all shares of such
class or series of stock of such constituent corporation, and
shall include in such notice a copy of this section and, if 1 of
the constituent corporations is a nonstock corporation, a copy
of § 114 of this title. Such notice may, and, if given
on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation,
shall, also notify such stockholders of the effective date of
the merger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to
appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of
mailing of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or
resulting corporation the appraisal of such holders
shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs
the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the
stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such
holders shares. If such notice did not notify stockholders
of the effective date of the merger or consolidation, either
(i) each such constituent corporation shall send a second
notice before the effective date of the merger or consolidation
notifying each of the holders of any class or series of stock of
such constituent corporation that are entitled to appraisal
rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation or
(ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send such
a second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days
after such effective date; provided, however, that if such
second notice is sent more than 20 days following the
sending of the first notice, such second notice need only be
sent to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and
who has demanded appraisal of such holders shares in
accordance with this subsection. An affidavit of the secretary
or assistant secretary or of the transfer agent of the
corporation that is required to give either notice that such
notice has been given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima
facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For purposes of
determining the stockholders entitled to receive either notice,
each constituent corporation may fix, in advance, a record date
that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the date the
notice is given, provided, that if the notice is given on or
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the
record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is
fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the
record date shall be the close of business on the day next
preceding the day on which the notice is given.
(e) Within 120 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation
or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a)
and (d) of this section hereof and who
H-2
is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an
appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of
Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of
all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any
time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger
or consolidation, any stockholder who has not commenced an
appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party
shall have the right to withdraw such stockholders demand
for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or
consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied
with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) of
this section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to
receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting
from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate
number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or
consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal
have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such
shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the
stockholder within 10 days after such stockholders
written request for such a statement is received by the
surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after
expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal
under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is
later. Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a
person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held
either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such
person may, in such persons own name, file a petition or
request from the corporation the statement described in this
subsection.
(f) Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder,
service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or
resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after
such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in
which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the
names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded
payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the
value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or
resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be
accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in
Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the
time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by
registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting
corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the
addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by 1
or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the
hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court
deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by
publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs
thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.
(g) At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall
determine the stockholders who have complied with this section
and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may
require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for
their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to
submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery
for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal
proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such
direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such
stockholder.
(h) After the Court determines the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in
accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery, including
any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through
such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the
shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation,
together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount
determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value,
the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless
the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause
shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through
the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded
quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve
discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective date of the
merger and the date of payment of the judgment. Upon application
by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder
entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court
may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal
prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to
an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list
filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to
subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such
stockholders certificates of
H-3
stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may
participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally
determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal
rights under this section.
(i) The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of
the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or
resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto.
Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case
of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of
holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender
to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock.
The Courts decree may be enforced as other decrees in the
Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any
state.
(j) The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the
Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in
the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court
may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any
stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys fees
and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata
against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
(k) From and after the effective date of the merger or
consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights
as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be
entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive
payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except
dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of
record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the
merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition
for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in
subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder
shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a
written withdrawal of such stockholders demand for an
appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation,
either within 60 days after the effective date of the
merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of
this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal
shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal
proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any
stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval
may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just;
provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right
of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding
or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such
stockholders demand for appraisal and to accept the terms
offered upon the merger or consolidation within 60 days
after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set
forth in subsection (e) of this section.
(l) The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to
which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been
converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall
have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the
surviving or resulting corporation.
H-4
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 20.
|
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
|
Delaware law permits a corporation to adopt a provision in its
certificate of incorporation eliminating or limiting the
personal liability of a director, but not an officer in his or
her capacity as such, to the corporation or its stockholders for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
except that such provision does not limit the liability of a
director for (i) any breach of the directors duty of
loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) acts
or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) liability
under section 174 of the DGCL for unlawful payment of
dividends or stock purchases or redemptions, or (iv) any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
Under Delaware law, a corporation may indemnify any person made
a party or threatened to be made a party to any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action
by or in the right of the corporation), because he or she is or
was an officer, director, employee or agent of the corporation
or was serving at the request of the corporation as an officer,
director, employee or agent of another corporation or entity
against expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred in connection with such proceeding: if he or she acted
in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, in the
case of a criminal proceeding, he or she had no reasonable cause
to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. A corporation
may indemnify any person made a party or threatened to be made a
party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit
brought by or in the right of the corporation because he or she
was an officer, director, employee or agent of the corporation,
or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a
director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or
other entity, against expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action
or suit if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or
she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, provided that such indemnification
will be denied if the person is found liable to the corporation
unless, in such a case, the court determines the person is
entitled to indemnification for such expenses as the court deems
proper. A corporation must indemnify a present or former
director or officer who successfully defends himself or herself
in a proceeding to which he or she was a party because he or she
was a director or officer of the corporation against expenses
actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection
with such proceeding. Expenses incurred by an officer or
director, or any employees or agents as deemed appropriate by
the board of directors, in defending civil or criminal
proceedings may be paid by the corporation in advance of the
final disposition of such proceedings upon receipt of an
undertaking by or on behalf of such director or officer to repay
such amount if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not
entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.
New Express Scripts current bylaws provide that New
Express Scripts shall indemnify any person who was or is a party
or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending
or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action
by or in the right of New Express Scripts), by reason of the
fact that such person is or was a director or officer of New
Express Scripts, or is or was a director or officer of New
Express Scripts serving at the request of New Express Scripts as
a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or
other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys
fees) and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person if such person acted in good faith and
in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of New Express Scripts, and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe such persons conduct was unlawful.
With respect to an action or suit by or in the right of New
Express Scripts to procure a judgment in its favor, New Express
Scripts shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action or suit if such person acted in good faith and
in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of New Express Scripts; except
II-1
that no indemnification shall be made if such person has been
adjudged to be liable to New Express Scripts unless a court
determines that, despite the adjudication of liability, such
person is entitled to be indemnified.
New Express Scripts will pay, in advance of the final
disposition of an action, suit or proceeding, expenses
(including attorneys fees) incurred by a director or
officer in defending such action, suit or proceeding upon
receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such director or
officer to repay such amount if it is determined that such
person is not entitled to be indemnified. New Express Scripts
shall not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer in
connection with a proceeding initiated by such person unless
such proceeding was authorized or consented to by the New
Express Scripts board.
The indemnification and advancement of expenses shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking
indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under
New Express Scripts certificate of incorporation, New
Express Scripts bylaws, an agreement, a vote of
stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
Upon consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement (which is included as Exhibit 2.1 of this
registration statement), New Express Scripts will amend and
restate its certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
New Express Scripts amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides that New Express Scripts shall indemnify,
to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL,
as amended from time to time, each person who is or was a
director or officer of New Express Scripts and the heirs,
executors and administrators of such a person.
New Express Scripts amended and restated bylaws provide
that New Express Scripts shall indemnify any person who was or
is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by
reason of the fact that he or she is or was or has agreed to
serve at the request of New Express Scripts as a director or
officer of New Express Scripts, or is or was serving or has
agreed to serve at the request of New Express Scripts as a
director or officer of another corporation or other enterprise,
against expenses (including attorneys fees) and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the
indemnitee, if the indemnitee acted in good faith and in a
manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of New Express Scripts and, with respect to
any criminal action, suit or proceeding, had no reasonable cause
to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
Additionally, New Express Scripts shall pay, in advance of a
final disposition, expenses (including attorneys fees)
incurred by a director or officer in defending any such action,
suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on
behalf of the director or officer to repay such amount if it
shall ultimately be determined that he or she is not entitled to
be indemnified.
In the case of an action or suit by or in the right of New
Express Scripts to procure a judgment in its favor (i) the
indemnification provided by the amended and restated bylaws
shall be limited to expenses (including attorneys fees)
actually and reasonably incurred by such person in the defense
or settlement of such action or suit, and (ii) no
indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or
matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be
liable to New Express Scripts unless a court shall determine
that, despite the adjudication of liability, such person is
entitled to be indemnified.
The New Express Scripts board may authorize New Express
Scripts counsel to represent a director or officer, in any
action, suit or proceeding, whether or not New Express Scripts
is a party to such action, suit or proceeding. To the extent
that any director or officer is, by reason of his or her
corporate status, a witness or otherwise participates in any
action, suit or proceeding at a time when such person is not a
party in the action, suit or proceeding, New Express Scripts
shall indemnify such person against all expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such
person or on his or her behalf in connection therewith.
Where the indemnification provided for in the amended and
restated bylaws of New Express Scripts is held by a court to be
unavailable to a director or officer in whole or in part, New
Express Scripts may contribute to the payment of such
directors or officers costs, charges and expenses
(including attorneys fees)
II-2
and amounts paid in settlement with respect to any action, suit
or proceeding under certain circumstances set forth in the
amended and restated bylaws.
If the DGCL is amended to expand further the indemnification
permitted to directors or officers, then New Express Scripts
shall indemnify such persons to the fullest extent permitted by
the DGCL, as so amended.
The indemnification provided by the amended and restated bylaws
shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those
indemnified may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of
stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
Additionally, New Express Scripts anticipates that it will enter
into separate indemnification agreements with each of its
directors and certain executive officers (including New Express
Scripts named executive officers), pursuant to which New
Express Scripts agrees to provide certain indemnification rights
to such officers and directors in exchange for their continued
service to New Express Scripts. Under these agreements, New
Express Scripts anticipates that it will agree, among other
things, to indemnify such officers and directors to the fullest
extent permitted by the DGCL, subject to certain limitations.
The indemnification agreements provide that the indemnified
party will be entitled to the indemnification rights described
in the following sentence if the indemnified party is a party or
is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding (other than
an action by or in the name of New Express Scripts) by reason of
the fact that the indemnified party is or was a director,
officer, employee or agent of New Express Scripts, or is or was
serving at the request of New Express Scripts as a director,
officer, employee or agent or fiduciary of any other entity. The
indemnified party will be indemnified against all costs,
judgments, expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the
indemnified party in connection with such proceeding, if the
indemnified party acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of New Express Scripts, and with respect to any
criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or
her conduct was unlawful.
The indemnification agreements provide that the indemnified
party will be entitled to the indemnification rights described
in the following sentence provided that the indemnified party
was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
proceeding brought by or in the name of New Express Scripts by
reason of the fact that the indemnified party is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent or fiduciary of New Express
Scripts, or by reason of anything done or not done by the
indemnified party in any such capacity. The indemnified party
will be indemnified against all costs, judgments, and expenses
actually and reasonably incurred by indemnified party in
connection with such proceeding if the indemnified party acted
in good faith and in a manner the indemnified party reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of New
Express Scripts; provided, that no such indemnification will be
made in respect of any claim as to which the DGCL expressly
prohibits such indemnification unless the Court of Chancery of
the State of Delaware or the court in which such suit is brought
determines that the indemnified party is entitled to
indemnification.
New Express Scripts will pay expenses incurred by the
indemnified party in advance of the final disposition of any
proceeding, subject to the receipt of an undertaking by the
indemnified party to reimburse such amounts if it is determined
that the indemnified party is not entitled to be indemnified
against such expenses.
|
|
ITEM 21.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
(a) The following exhibits are filed herewith or
incorporated herein by reference:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 2011, by
and among Express Scripts, Inc., Medco Health Solutions, Inc.,
Aristotle Holding, Inc., Aristotle Merger Sub, Inc., and Plato
Merger Sub, Inc., as amended by Amendment No. 1 (included
as Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus forming
a part of this Registration Statement)
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Form of Amended Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Aristotle Holding, Inc. (included as Annex F to the joint
proxy statement/prospectus forming a part of this Registration
Statement)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Form of Amended Restated Bylaws of Aristotle Holding, Inc.
(included as Annex G to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus forming a part of this Registration
Statement)
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
regarding legality of securities being registered
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP regarding certain
U.S. federal income tax matters
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
Opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
regarding certain U.S. federal income tax matters
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed
charges
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Aristotle Holding, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants
for Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants
for Express Scripts, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
(included as part of its opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (included as part
of its opinion filed as Exhibit 8.1)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
(included as part of its opinion filed as Exhibit 8.2)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Form of Medco Health Solutions, Inc. Proxy Card
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Form of Express Scripts, Inc. Proxy Card
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
99
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
1. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows:
That prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered
hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this
registration statement, by any person or party who is deemed to
be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the
issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain
the information called for by the applicable registration form
with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed
underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the
other Items of the applicable form.
2. The registrant undertakes that every prospectus
(i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph
(1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to
meet the requirements of section 10(a)(3) of the Act and is
used in connection with an offering of securities subject to
Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an amendment to the
registration statement and will not be used until such amendment
is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
3. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13
of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class
mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information
contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of
the registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
4. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
the registration statement when it became effective.
5. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows:
(A) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum
aggregate offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration
statement;
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement;
(B) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof; and
(C) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
6. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the registrants annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration
statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
7. That, for purposes of determining liability under the
Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, each prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of this registration
statement shall be deemed to be part of and included in this
registration statement as of the date it is first used after
effectiveness; provided, however, that no statement made in this
registration statement or prospectus that is part of this
registration statement or made in a document incorporated or
deemed incorporated by reference into this registration
statement or prospectus that is part of this registration
statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of
sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement
that was made in this registration statement or prospectus that
was part of this registration statement or made in any such
document immediately prior to such date of first use.
II-5
8. That, for purposes of determining liability of the
undersigned registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any
purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, in a
primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant
pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the
underwriting method used to sell the securities to the
purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such
purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the
undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and
will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such
purchaser:
(A) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(B) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(C) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(D) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
9. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under
the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the city of Saint Louis, State of Missouri, on
November 14, 2011.
ARISTOTLE HOLDING, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Jeffrey
Hall
Name: Jeffrey
Hall
Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
indicated below on November 14, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
*
George
Paz
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Jeffrey
Hall
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Kelley
Elliott
|
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate
Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Gary
G. Benanav
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Maura
C. Breen
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
William
J. DeLaney
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Nicholas
J. LaHowchic
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
P. Mac Mahon
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Frank
Mergenthaler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Woodrow
A. Myers Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
John
O. Parker
|
|
Director
|
II-7
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
*
Samuel
Skinner
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Seymour
Sternberg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*By Keith J.
Ebling
Keith
J. Ebling
|
|
Attorney-in-fact
|
II-8