e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
.
Commission file number 0-15341
Donegal Group Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
23-2424711 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1195 River Road, P.O. Box 302, Marietta, PA 17547
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(717) 426-1931
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 20,004,315 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
and 5,576,775 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding on July 29,
2011.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity, at amortized cost |
|
$ |
62,862,624 |
|
|
$ |
64,766,429 |
|
Available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
630,545,678 |
|
|
|
603,846,201 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
14,501,261 |
|
|
|
10,161,614 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
29,971,736 |
|
|
|
8,991,577 |
|
Short-term investments, at cost, which
approximates fair value |
|
|
33,560,242 |
|
|
|
40,775,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
771,441,541 |
|
|
|
728,541,814 |
|
Cash |
|
|
3,687,405 |
|
|
|
16,342,212 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
7,038,680 |
|
|
|
7,365,171 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
107,100,320 |
|
|
|
96,467,949 |
|
Reinsurance receivable |
|
|
189,975,735 |
|
|
|
173,836,746 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
36,360,264 |
|
|
|
34,445,579 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
10,586,934 |
|
|
|
11,988,169 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
106,382,310 |
|
|
|
89,365,771 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
6,477,407 |
|
|
|
7,069,086 |
|
Accounts receivable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428,983 |
|
Federal income taxes recoverable |
|
|
920,226 |
|
|
|
948,325 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,625,354 |
|
|
|
5,493,316 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
958,010 |
|
|
|
958,010 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,439,122 |
|
|
|
1,368,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,247,993,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,174,619,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
402,741,902 |
|
|
$ |
383,318,672 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
335,637,737 |
|
|
|
297,272,161 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
21,431,558 |
|
|
|
21,287,406 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
21,081,236 |
|
|
|
19,140,322 |
|
Borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
54,500,000 |
|
|
|
35,617,371 |
|
Cash dividends declared to stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,870,955 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
20,465,000 |
|
|
|
20,465,000 |
|
Accounts payable securities |
|
|
3,238,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payable for the purchase of Michigan Insurance Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,207,471 |
|
Due to affiliate |
|
|
2,641,815 |
|
|
|
2,926,104 |
|
Drafts payable |
|
|
1,854,144 |
|
|
|
1,304,779 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,733,806 |
|
|
|
3,106,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
865,325,518 |
|
|
|
794,516,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, authorized
2,000,000 shares; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
30,000,000 shares, issued 20,705,303 and 20,656,527
shares and outstanding 19,992,944 and 19,994,226 shares |
|
|
207,054 |
|
|
|
206,566 |
|
Class B common stock, $.01 par value, authorized
10,000,000 shares, issued 5,649,240 shares and
outstanding 5,576,775 shares |
|
|
56,492 |
|
|
|
56,492 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
167,803,221 |
|
|
|
167,093,504 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
13,619,827 |
|
|
|
8,561,086 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
210,905,634 |
|
|
|
213,435,095 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(9,924,438 |
) |
|
|
(9,249,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
382,667,790 |
|
|
|
380,102,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,247,993,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,174,619,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
104,991,401 |
|
|
$ |
93,002,409 |
|
Investment income, net of investment expenses |
|
|
5,420,992 |
|
|
|
4,968,490 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
4,316,021 |
|
|
|
1,965,091 |
|
Lease income |
|
|
234,861 |
|
|
|
229,490 |
|
Installment payment fees |
|
|
1,872,672 |
|
|
|
1,359,874 |
|
Other income |
|
|
218,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
117,054,498 |
|
|
|
101,525,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
84,195,796 |
|
|
|
68,509,616 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
16,628,000 |
|
|
|
16,146,000 |
|
Other underwriting expenses |
|
|
17,092,478 |
|
|
|
14,182,695 |
|
Policyholder dividends |
|
|
98,915 |
|
|
|
65,482 |
|
Interest |
|
|
558,842 |
|
|
|
168,935 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
552,066 |
|
|
|
581,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
119,126,097 |
|
|
|
99,654,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(2,071,599 |
) |
|
|
1,870,876 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(377,610 |
) |
|
|
131,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,693,989 |
) |
|
$ |
1,739,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,693,989 |
) |
|
$ |
1,739,728 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unrealized gain on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding income during the period,
net of income tax |
|
|
7,692,542 |
|
|
|
4,383,766 |
|
Reclassification adjustment, net of income tax |
|
|
(2,848,574 |
) |
|
|
(1,296,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,843,968 |
|
|
|
3,086,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,149,979 |
|
|
$ |
4,826,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
208,786,680 |
|
|
$ |
184,374,505 |
|
Investment income, net of investment expenses |
|
|
10,651,136 |
|
|
|
9,898,981 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
4,689,094 |
|
|
|
1,986,603 |
|
Lease income |
|
|
466,543 |
|
|
|
455,997 |
|
Installment payment fees |
|
|
3,706,536 |
|
|
|
2,660,116 |
|
Other income |
|
|
337,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
228,637,940 |
|
|
|
199,376,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
157,275,361 |
|
|
|
136,491,102 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
33,620,000 |
|
|
|
32,161,000 |
|
Other underwriting expenses |
|
|
34,539,390 |
|
|
|
26,815,711 |
|
Policyholder dividends |
|
|
305,929 |
|
|
|
244,783 |
|
Interest |
|
|
1,002,312 |
|
|
|
353,693 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
1,370,412 |
|
|
|
1,163,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
228,113,404 |
|
|
|
197,229,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
524,536 |
|
|
|
2,146,414 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12,589 |
|
|
|
171,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
511,947 |
|
|
$ |
1,974,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
511,947 |
|
|
$ |
1,974,486 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unrealized gain on securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding income during the period,
net of income tax |
|
|
8,153,543 |
|
|
|
3,932,612 |
|
Reclassification adjustment, net of income tax |
|
|
(3,094,802 |
) |
|
|
(1,311,158 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
5,058,741 |
|
|
|
2,621,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
5,570,688 |
|
|
$ |
4,595,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
|
Class A Amount |
|
|
Class B Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
20,656,527 |
|
|
|
5,649,240 |
|
|
$ |
206,566 |
|
|
$ |
56,492 |
|
|
$ |
167,093,504 |
|
|
$ |
8,561,086 |
|
|
$ |
213,435,095 |
|
|
$ |
(9,249,933 |
) |
|
$ |
380,102,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock (stock
compensation plans) |
|
|
48,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,006,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,006,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(674,505 |
) |
|
|
(674,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,058,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,058,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
|
20,705,303 |
|
|
|
5,649,240 |
|
|
$ |
207,054 |
|
|
$ |
56,492 |
|
|
$ |
167,803,221 |
|
|
$ |
13,619,827 |
|
|
$ |
210,905,634 |
|
|
$ |
(9,924,438 |
) |
|
$ |
382,667,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Donegal Group Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
511,947 |
|
|
$ |
1,974,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,925,467 |
|
|
|
1,257,660 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
(4,689,094 |
) |
|
|
(1,986,603 |
) |
Equity (income) loss |
|
|
(337,951 |
) |
|
|
197,545 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses |
|
|
19,423,230 |
|
|
|
12,631,578 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
38,365,576 |
|
|
|
17,016,015 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
(10,632,371 |
) |
|
|
(8,923,708 |
) |
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(1,914,685 |
) |
|
|
(1,028,946 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,251,607 |
) |
|
|
(579,005 |
) |
Reinsurance receivable |
|
|
(16,138,989 |
) |
|
|
(9,125,388 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
(17,016,539 |
) |
|
|
(6,100,772 |
) |
Accrued investment income |
|
|
326,491 |
|
|
|
(233,132 |
) |
Due to affiliate |
|
|
(284,289 |
) |
|
|
(1,769,359 |
) |
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
1,940,914 |
|
|
|
694,923 |
|
Current income taxes |
|
|
28,099 |
|
|
|
1,318,713 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
144,152 |
|
|
|
(1,299,672 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(894,038 |
) |
|
|
297,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustments |
|
|
8,994,366 |
|
|
|
2,367,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
9,506,313 |
|
|
|
4,342,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
(71,799,322 |
) |
|
|
(80,020,763 |
) |
Purchases of equity securities, available for sale |
|
|
(14,261,819 |
) |
|
|
(11,014,460 |
) |
Maturity of fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
1,709,495 |
|
|
|
5,612,123 |
|
Available for sale |
|
|
26,504,947 |
|
|
|
39,093,985 |
|
Sales of fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
32,233,706 |
|
|
|
26,454,158 |
|
Sales of equity securities, available for sale |
|
|
11,007,627 |
|
|
|
6,765,783 |
|
Purchase of Michigan Insurance Company |
|
|
(7,207,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390,737 |
) |
Net increase in investment in affiliates |
|
|
(20,570,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net sales of short-term investments |
|
|
7,215,751 |
|
|
|
11,378,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(35,167,086 |
) |
|
|
(2,121,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(5,877,789 |
) |
|
|
(5,666,605 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
675,631 |
|
|
|
790,633 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(674,505 |
) |
|
|
(145,687 |
) |
Payments on line of credit |
|
|
(3,617,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
22,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
13,005,966 |
|
|
|
(5,021,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(12,654,807 |
) |
|
|
(2,800,719 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
16,342,212 |
|
|
|
12,923,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
3,687,405 |
|
|
$ |
10,123,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period Interest |
|
$ |
788,976 |
|
|
$ |
337,677 |
|
Net cash paid (received) during period Taxes |
|
$ |
1,110,000 |
|
|
$ |
(600,000 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
DONEGAL GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1 Organization
Donegal Mutual Insurance Company (Donegal Mutual) organized us as an insurance holding
company on August 26, 1986. Our insurance subsidiaries, Atlantic States Insurance Company
(Atlantic States), Southern Insurance Company of Virginia (Southern), Le Mars Insurance Company
(Le Mars), the Peninsula Insurance Group (Peninsula), which consists of Peninsula Indemnity
Company and The Peninsula Insurance Company, Sheboygan Falls Insurance Company (Sheboygan) and
Michigan Insurance Company (Michigan), write personal and commercial lines of property and
casualty coverages exclusively through a network of independent insurance agents in certain
Mid-Atlantic, Midwestern, New England and Southern states. We acquired Michigan on December 1,
2010, and we have included Michigans results of operations in our consolidated results of
operations since that date. We have three operating segments: our investment function, our personal
lines of insurance and our commercial lines of insurance. The personal lines products of our
insurance subsidiaries consist primarily of homeowners and private passenger automobile policies.
The commercial lines products of our insurance subsidiaries consist primarily of commercial
automobile, commercial multi-peril and workers compensation policies. We also own 48.2% of the
outstanding stock of Donegal Financial Services Corporation (DFSC), a thrift holding company that
owns Union Community Bank FSB (UCB). Donegal Mutual owns the remaining 51.8% of the outstanding
stock of DFSC.
At June 30, 2011, Donegal Mutual held approximately 39% of our outstanding Class A common
stock and approximately 75% of our outstanding Class B common stock. This ownership provides
Donegal Mutual with 66% of the total voting power of our outstanding common stock. Our insurance
subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual have interrelated operations. While each company maintains its
separate corporate existence, our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual conduct business
together as the Donegal Insurance Group. As such, Donegal Mutual and our insurance subsidiaries
share the same business philosophy, the same management, the same employees and the same facilities
and offer the same types of insurance products.
Atlantic States, our largest subsidiary, participates in a pooling agreement with Donegal
Mutual. Under the pooling agreement, the two companies pool their insurance business, and each
company receives an allocated percentage of the pooled business. Atlantic States has an 80% share
of the results of the pooled business, and Donegal Mutual has a 20% share of the results of the
pooled business.
On February 23, 2009, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program pursuant to
which we may purchase up to 300,000 shares of our Class A common stock at prices prevailing from
time to time in the open market subject to the provisions of applicable SEC rules and in privately
negotiated transactions. We purchased 50,058 shares of our Class A common stock under this program
during the three months ended June 30, 2011. We purchased 50,058 and 9,702 shares of our Class A
common stock under this program during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. We have
purchased a total of 67,429 shares of our Class A common stock under this program from its
inception through June 30, 2011.
In May 2011, DFSC and Union National Financial Corporation (UNNF) merged, with DFSC as the
surviving company in the merger. Province Bank FSB and Union National Community Bank, which UNNF
owned, also merged and now operate as UCB.
2 Basis of Presentation
Our financial information for the interim periods included in this Form 10-Q Report is
unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments that, in the opinion of our management, are necessary for a fair presentation of our
financial position, results of operations and cash flows for those interim periods. Our results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations we expect for the year ending December 31, 2011.
You should read these interim financial statements in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
6
3 Earnings Per Share
We have two classes of common stock, which we refer to as our Class A common stock and our
Class B common stock. Our certificate of incorporation provides that whenever our board of
directors declares a dividend on our Class B common stock, our board of directors must also declare
a dividend on our Class A common stock that is payable at the same time to holders as of the same
record date at a rate that is at least 10% greater than the rate at which our board of directors
declared a dividend on our Class B common stock. Accordingly, we use the two-class method to
compute our earnings per common share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that
determines earnings per share separately for each class of common stock based on dividends we have
declared and an allocation of our remaining undistributed earnings using a participation percentage
that reflects the dividend rights of each class. The table below presents for the periods indicated
a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators we used to compute basic and diluted net (loss)
income per share for each class of our common stock:
For the Three Months Ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,344 |
) |
|
$ |
(350 |
) |
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
20,026,238 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,953,539 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of net income |
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
20,019,481 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
19,942,153 |
|
|
|
5,576,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not include outstanding options to purchase the following number of shares of
Class A common stock in our computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of
the options was greater than the average market price of our Class A common stock during the
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Number of shares excluded |
|
|
4,021,667 |
|
|
|
3,290,099 |
|
|
|
4,021,667 |
|
|
|
3,290,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Reinsurance
Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual have participated in a pooling agreement since 1986 under
which each company places all of its direct written business into the pool, and Atlantic States and
Donegal Mutual then share the underwriting results of the pool in accordance with the terms of the
pooling agreement. Atlantic States has an 80% share of the results of the pool, and Donegal Mutual
has a 20% share of the results of the pool.
7
Our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual purchase certain third-party reinsurance on a
combined basis. Le Mars, Michigan, Peninsula and Sheboygan also purchase separate third-party
reinsurance that provides coverage that is commensurate with their relative size and risk
exposures. Our insurance subsidiaries place reinsurance with various reinsurers, all of which,
consistent with Donegal Insurance Groups requirements, have an A.M. Best rating of A- (Excellent)
or better or, with respect to foreign reinsurers, have a financial condition that, in the opinion
of our management, is equivalent to a company with at least an A- rating. The following
information describes the external reinsurance our insurance subsidiaries have in place during 2011
and 2010:
|
|
|
excess of loss reinsurance, under which losses are automatically reinsured,
through a series of reinsurance agreements, over a set retention (generally
$750,000), and |
|
|
|
|
catastrophe reinsurance, under which Donegal Mutual, Atlantic States and Southern
recover, through a series of reinsurance agreements, 100% of an accumulation of many
losses resulting from a single event, including natural disasters, over a set
retention ($5.0 million for 2011 and $3.0 million for 2010). |
Our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual also purchase facultative reinsurance to cover
exposures from losses that exceed the limits provided by their reinsurance agreements with third
parties.
In addition to the pooling agreement and third-party reinsurance, our insurance subsidiaries
have various reinsurance agreements with Donegal Mutual.
Upon the recovery of losses under
the terms of our insurance subsidiaries catastrophe reinsurance agreements with third parties and Donegal Mutual, the
agreements require our insurance subsidiaries to pay reinstatement premiums to reinstate coverage for additional events
that may occur during the term of the agreements. Payment of a reinstatement premium entitles our insurance subsidiaries
to the same amount of coverage under the same terms in place prior to their utilization of coverage. Our insurance
subsidiaries recognize the cost of the original prepaid reinsurance premiums ratably over the term of the agreements
and immediately recognize the cost of reinstatement premiums upon recovery of losses that give rise to an obligation
to pay such reinstatement premiums. Our insurance subsidiaries recorded reinstatement premiums of $3.2 million and $1.2
million during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our insurance subsidiaries recorded
reinstatement premiums of $3.2 million and $1.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Other than a change in the set retention under our catastrophe reinsurance we discuss above,
we made no significant changes to our third-party reinsurance or the reinsurance agreements between
our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
5 Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of our fixed maturities and equity securities at June
30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,073 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
58,159 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,119 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
3,249 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,281 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
62,863 |
|
|
$ |
3,096 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
81,984 |
|
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
82,925 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
360,334 |
|
|
|
12,119 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
371,609 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
67,568 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
67,647 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
106,193 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
108,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
616,079 |
|
|
|
16,325 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
630,546 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
11,056 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
14,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
627,135 |
|
|
$ |
20,647 |
|
|
$ |
2,735 |
|
|
$ |
645,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of our fixed maturities and equity
securities at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
59,852 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,746 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
3,247 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
64,766 |
|
|
$ |
3,043 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
57,284 |
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
57,316 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
388,091 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
389,629 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
67,518 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
67,094 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
88,410 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
89,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
601,303 |
|
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
7,280 |
|
|
|
603,846 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
10,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
603,807 |
|
|
$ |
17,516 |
|
|
$ |
7,315 |
|
|
$ |
614,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of our fixed maturities at June 30, 2011, by
contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
3,749 |
|
|
$ |
3,782 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
34,459 |
|
|
|
36,291 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
24,200 |
|
|
|
25,400 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held to maturity |
|
$ |
62,863 |
|
|
$ |
65,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
23,703 |
|
|
$ |
24,086 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
88,085 |
|
|
|
89,947 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
180,942 |
|
|
|
185,450 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
217,156 |
|
|
|
222,698 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
106,193 |
|
|
|
108,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale |
|
$ |
616,079 |
|
|
$ |
630,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Gross realized gains and losses from investments before applicable income taxes are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gross realized gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
1,631 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
4,416 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,048 |
|
|
$ |
4,946 |
|
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
179 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains |
|
$ |
4,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
|
$ |
4,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We held fixed maturities and equity securities with unrealized losses representing declines
that we considered temporary at June 30, 2011 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
16,846 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
41,891 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
28,184 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
31,995 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securites |
|
|
5,529 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
124,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
1,493 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We held fixed maturities and equity securities with unrealized losses representing
declines that we considered temporary at December 31, 2010 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
23,901 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
171,610 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
44,101 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
35,930 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securites |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
275,856 |
|
|
$ |
7,212 |
|
|
$ |
1,898 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of our total fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss at June 30, 2011, we
classified 115 securities with a fair value of $120.4 million and an unrealized loss of $1.9
million as available-for-sale and carried them at fair value on our balance sheet.
Of our total fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss at December 31, 2010, we
classified 301 securities with a fair value of $277.4 million and an unrealized loss of $7.3
million as available-for-sale and carried them at fair value on our balance sheet.
We have no direct exposure to sub-prime residential mortgage-backed securities and hold no
collateralized debt obligations. Substantially all of the unrealized losses in our fixed maturity
investment portfolio have resulted from general market conditions and the related impact on our
fixed maturity
investment valuations. We make estimates concerning the valuation of our investments and the
recognition
10
of other-than-temporary declines in the value of our investments. For equity
securities, when we consider the decline in value of an individual investment to be other than
temporary, we write the investment down to its fair value, and we reflect the amount of the
write-down as a realized loss in our results of operations. We individually monitor all investments
for other-than-temporary declines in value. Generally, if an individual equity security has
depreciated in value by more than 20% of original cost, and has been in such an unrealized loss
position for more than six months, we assume there has been an other-than-temporary decline in
value. We held 11 equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011.
Based upon our analysis of general market conditions and underlying factors impacting these equity
securities, we consider these declines in value to be temporary. With respect to a debt security
that is in an unrealized loss position, we first assess if we intend to sell the debt security. If
we intend to sell the debt security, we recognize the impairment loss in our results of operations.
If we do not intend to sell the debt security, we determine whether it is more likely than not that
we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery. If it is more likely than not that we
will be required to sell the debt security prior to recovery, we recognize an impairment loss in
our results of operations. If it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the
debt security prior to recovery, we then evaluate whether a credit loss has occurred. To determine
whether a credit loss has occurred, we compare the amortized cost of the debt security to the
present value of the cash flows we expect to collect. If we expect a cash flow shortfall, we
consider a credit loss to have occurred. If we consider a credit loss to have occurred, we consider
the impairment to be other than temporary. We then recognize the amount of the impairment loss
related to the credit loss in our results of operations, and we recognize the remaining portion of
the impairment loss in our other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. In addition, we may
write down securities in an unrealized loss position based on a number of other factors, including
the fair value of the investment being significantly below its cost, whether the financial
condition of the issuer of the security has deteriorated, the occurrence of industry, company and
geographic events that have negatively impacted the value of the security and rating agency
downgrades. We determined that no investments with fair values below cost had declined on an
other-than-temporary basis during the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
We amortize premiums and discounts on debt securities over the life of the security as an
adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. We compute realized investment gains and
losses using the specific identification method.
We amortize premiums and discounts for mortgage-backed debt securities using anticipated
prepayments.
We account for investments in our affiliates using the equity method of accounting. Under this
method, we record our investment at cost, with adjustments for our share of our affiliates
earnings and losses as well as changes in our affiliates
equity due to unrealized gains and losses. Our investments in affiliates include our 48.2% ownership interest in DFSC. We have compiled
the following summary financial information for DFSC at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, from the financial statements of DFSC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
558,019 |
|
|
$ |
99,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
496,896 |
|
|
$ |
81,510 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
61,123 |
|
|
|
17,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
558,019 |
|
|
$ |
99,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Income statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
(410 |
) |
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
6 Segment Information
We evaluate the performance of our personal lines and commercial lines segments based upon the
underwriting results of our insurance subsidiaries using statutory accounting principles (SAP)
that various state insurance departments prescribe or permit. Our management uses SAP to measure
the performance of our insurance subsidiaries instead of GAAP. Financial data by segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
37,039 |
|
|
$ |
28,903 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
68,956 |
|
|
|
64,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
105,995 |
|
|
|
93,002 |
|
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP premiums earned |
|
|
104,992 |
|
|
|
93,002 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
117,054 |
|
|
$ |
101,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
(14,821 |
) |
|
|
(9,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(14,519 |
) |
|
|
(7,600 |
) |
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(13,024 |
) |
|
|
(5,901 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
($2,072 |
) |
|
$ |
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
71,943 |
|
|
$ |
56,591 |
|
Personal lines |
|
|
139,632 |
|
|
|
127,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
211,575 |
|
|
|
184,402 |
|
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
(2,788 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP premiums earned |
|
|
208,787 |
|
|
|
184,374 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
10,651 |
|
|
|
9,899 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
3,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
228,638 |
|
|
$ |
199,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial lines |
|
$ |
428 |
|
|
|
( $761 |
) |
Personal lines |
|
|
(17,812 |
) |
|
|
(12,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(17,384 |
) |
|
|
(13,028 |
) |
GAAP adjustments |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP underwriting loss |
|
|
(16,954 |
) |
|
|
(11,338 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
10,651 |
|
|
|
9,899 |
|
Realized investment gains |
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
525 |
|
|
$ |
2,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
7 Borrowings
Line of Credit
In June 2011, we renewed our existing credit agreement with Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Company (M&T) relating to a $60.0 million unsecured, revolving line of credit that expires in
July 2014. We have the right to request a one-year extension of the credit agreement as of each
anniversary date of the agreement. In December 2010 and March 2011, we borrowed $35.0 million and
$3.5 million, respectively, in connection with our acquisition of Michigan. In May 2011, we
borrowed $19.0 million in connection with the merger of UNNF with and into DFSC. As of June 30,
2011, we had $54.5 million in outstanding borrowings and had the ability to borrow an additional
$5.5 million at interest rates equal to M&Ts current prime rate or the then current LIBOR rate
plus between 1.75% and 2.25%, depending on our leverage ratio. We pay a fee of 0.2% per annum on
the loan commitment amount regardless of usage. The credit agreement requires our compliance with
certain covenants, which include minimum levels of our net worth, leverage ratio and statutory
surplus and the A.M. Best ratings of our insurance subsidiaries. We complied with all requirements
of the credit agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Subordinated Debentures
On October 29, 2003, we received $10.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of
subordinated debentures. The debentures mature on October 29, 2033 and are callable at our option,
at par. The debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 4.10%, which
is adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2011, the interest rate on these debentures was 4.12% and was
next subject to adjustment on July 29, 2011.
On May 24, 2004, we received $5.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of subordinated
debentures. The debentures mature on May 24, 2034 and are callable at our option, at par. The
debentures carry an interest rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.85%, which is
adjustable quarterly. At June 30, 2011, the interest rate on these debentures was 4.11% and was
next subject to adjustment on August 24, 2011.
In January 2002, West Bend Mutual Insurance Company (West Bend) purchased a surplus note
from Michigan for $5.0 million to increase Michigans statutory surplus. On December 1, 2010,
Donegal Mutual purchased the surplus note from West Bend at face value. The surplus note carries an
interest rate of 5.00%, and any repayment of principal or interest requires prior insurance
regulatory approval.
8 ShareBased Compensation
We measure all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, using a
fair-value-based method and the recording of such expense in our consolidated statements of income.
In determining the expense we record for stock options granted to directors and employees of our
subsidiaries and affiliates other than Donegal Mutual, we estimate the fair value of each option
award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The significant
assumptions we utilize in applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model are the risk-free
interest rate, expected term, dividend yield and expected volatility.
We charged compensation expense for our stock compensation plans against income before income
taxes of $29,104 and $60,824 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, with
a corresponding income tax benefit of $9,895 and $20,680, respectively. We charged compensation
expense for our stock compensation plans against income before income taxes of $69,486 and $120,985
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, with a corresponding income tax
benefit of $23,625 and $41,135, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, our total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation granted under our stock
compensation plans was $208,471. We expect to recognize this cost over a weighted average period of
4.1 years.
We account for share-based compensation to employees and directors of Donegal Mutual as
share-based compensation to employees of a controlling entity. As such, we measure the fair value
of the award at the grant date and recognize the fair value as a dividend to Donegal Mutual. This
accounting applies to options we grant to employees and directors of Donegal Mutual, the employer
of a majority of the employees that provide services to us. We recorded no implied dividends for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We recorded implied dividends of
$34,574 and $23,072 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
13
We received no cash from option exercises under all stock option compensation plans for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. We realized no tax benefits for tax deductions from option
exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
9 Fair Value Measurements
We account for financial assets using a framework that establishes a hierarchy that ranks the
quality and reliability of inputs, or assumptions, used in the determination of fair value, and we
classify financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value in one of the following three
categories:
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2 directly or indirectly observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices; and
Level 3 unobservable inputs not corroborated by market data.
For investments that have quoted market prices in active markets, we use the quoted market
price as fair value and include these investments in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. We
classify publicly traded equity securities as Level 1. When quoted market prices in active markets
are not available, we base fair values on quoted market prices of comparable instruments or broker
quotes we obtain from independent pricing services through a bank trustee. We classify our fixed
maturity investments as Level 2. Our fixed maturity investments consist of U.S. Treasury securities
and obligations of U.S, government corporations and agencies, obligations of states and political
subdivisions, corporate securities and residential mortgage-backed securities. During the first six
months of 2010, we classified one equity security as Level 3. The terms of an initial public
offering included a restriction from selling that security for a specified period. During the six
months ended June 30, 2011, the restriction period expired for a portion of our holdings, and we
transferred this portion from Level 3 to Level 1. We utilized a fair value model that incorporated
significant other unobservable inputs, such as estimated volatility, to estimate the fair value of
the remaining portion of our holdings in this security that remain subject to the selling
restriction. The fair value we determined as of June 30, 2011 reflects this restriction, and we
continue to classify this portion of our holdings in this security as Level 3.
We present our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities at
estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of a security may differ from the amount we could
realize if we sold the security in a forced transaction. In addition, the valuation of fixed
maturity investments is more subjective when markets are less liquid, increasing the potential that
the estimated fair value does not reflect the price at which an actual transaction would occur. We
utilize nationally recognized independent pricing services to estimate fair values for our fixed
maturity and equity investments. The pricing services utilize market quotations for fixed maturity
and equity securities that have quoted prices in active markets. For fixed maturity securities
that generally do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing services prepare estimates of fair value
measurements using proprietary pricing applications, which include available relevant market
information, benchmark yields, sector curves and matrix pricing. The pricing services do not use
broker quotes in determining the fair values of our investments. We review the estimates of fair
value the pricing services provide to determine if the estimates we obtain are representative of
fair values based upon our general knowledge of the market, our research findings related to
unusual fluctuations in value and our comparison of such values to execution prices for similar
securities. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we received one estimate per security from
one of the pricing services, and we priced all but an insignificant amount of our Level 1 and Level
2 investments using those prices. In our review of the estimates the pricing services provided to
us as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not identify any discrepancies, and we did not
make any adjustments to the estimates the pricing services provided to us.
We present our cash and short-term investments at estimated fair value. The carrying values in
the balance sheet for premium receivables and reinsurance receivables and payables for premiums and
paid losses and loss expenses approximate their fair values. The carrying amounts reported in the
balance sheet for our subordinated debentures and borrowings under line of credit approximate their fair values.
We evaluate our assets and liabilities on a recurring basis to determine the appropriate level
at which to classify them for each reporting period.
14
The following table presents our fair value measurements for our investments in
available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
82,925 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,925 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
371,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
67,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
108,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
14,501 |
|
|
|
9,086 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
4,024 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
645,047 |
|
|
$ |
9,086 |
|
|
$ |
631,937 |
|
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
|
|
We did not have any transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the quarter ended June 30,
2011.
The following table presents our fair value
measurements for our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
57,316 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57,316 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
389,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
67,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
89,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
10,162 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
7,573 |
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
614,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
|
$ |
605,283 |
|
|
$ |
7,573 |
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a roll forward of the significant unobservable inputs for
our Level 3 securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
3,628 |
|
|
$ |
5,852 |
|
Transfer to level 1 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net unrealized gain |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 |
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
6,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
7,573 |
|
|
$ |
6,232 |
|
Transfer to level 1 |
|
$ |
(3,966 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Net unrealized gain |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30 |
|
$ |
4,024 |
|
|
$ |
6,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
10 Income Taxes
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, we had no material unrecognized tax
benefits or accrued interest and penalties. Tax years 2007 through 2010 remained open for
examination as of June 30, 2011.
11 Business Combinations
In December 2010, we acquired Michigan, which had been a majority-owned subsidiary of West
Bend. Michigan writes various lines of property and casualty insurance and had direct written
premiums of $105.4 million and net written premiums of $27.1 million for the year ended December
31, 2010. Effective on December 1, 2010, Michigan entered into a 50% quota-share agreement with
third-party reinsurers and a 25% quota-share reinsurance agreement with Donegal Mutual to replace
the 75% quota-share reinsurance agreement Michigan maintained with West Bend through November 30,
2010. The final purchase price for the acquisition was $42.3 million in cash.
During the first quarter of 2011, we completed our analysis of the estimated acquisition date
fair value of the assets we acquired and the liabilities we assumed. Based on the finalized
analysis of our valuation specialist, we decreased the fair value of other assets acquired by
$132,000 and recorded a corresponding increase to goodwill.
As part of our acquisition accounting for Michigan in 2010, we eliminated Michigans deferred
policy acquisition costs and unearned commission income and recorded Michigans obligations and
rights under unexpired insurance and reinsurance contracts at their estimated fair value. We
estimated the fair value adjustments by applying a market ceding commission rate to Michigans
unearned premiums and prepaid reinsurance premiums that resulted in a net reduction of Michigans
obligations. We are amortizing the ceding commission component of the fair value adjustments over
the estimated remaining term of Michigans policies in force as of the acquisition date and
recording the amortization as a reduction in net premiums earned. For the six months ended June 30
2011, we recorded a reduction in net premiums earned of $2.8 million related to this amortization.
We will amortize the remaining fair value adjustments of $493,000 throughout the remainder of 2011.
12 Impact of New Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends
ASC subtopic 820-10 by requiring new, and clarifying existing, fair value disclosures. We have
included herein the disclosures ASU 2010-06 requires for the first six months of 2011.
In October 2010, the FASB issued updated guidance to address the diversity in practice for the
accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. This guidance
modifies the definition of acquisition costs to specify that a cost must relate directly to the
successful acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract to qualify for deferral. If
application of this guidance would result in the capitalization of acquisition costs that a
reporting entity had not previously capitalized, the entity may elect not to capitalize those
costs. The updated guidance is effective for periods ending after December 15, 2011. We do not
expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial position or results
of operations.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
You should read the following information in conjunction with the historical financial
information and the notes thereto we include in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should also
read Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We combine our financial statements with those of our insurance subsidiaries and present our
financial statements on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
Our insurance subsidiaries make estimates and assumptions that can have a significant effect
on amounts and disclosures that we report in our financial statements. The most significant
estimates relate to our insurance subsidiaries reserves for property and casualty insurance unpaid
losses and loss expenses,
16
valuation of investments and determination of other-than-temporary
impairment in the value of investments and policy acquisition costs. While we believe our estimates
and the estimates of our insurance subsidiaries are appropriate, the ultimate amounts may differ
from the amounts we and our insurance subsidiaries estimate. We regularly review these estimates
and reflect any adjustment we consider necessary in our current results of operations.
Liability for Unpaid Losses and Loss Expenses
Liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses are estimates at a given point in time of the
amounts an insurer expects to pay with respect to policyholder claims based on facts and
circumstances the insurer knows at the time. At the time an insurer establishes its estimates, it
recognizes that its ultimate liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses will exceed or be less
than those estimates. Our insurance subsidiaries base their estimates of liabilities for unpaid
losses and loss expenses on assumptions as to future loss trends and expected claims severity,
judicial theories of liability and other factors, including prevailing economic conditions.
However, during the loss adjustment period, our insurance subsidiaries may learn additional facts
regarding individual claims, and, consequently, it often becomes necessary for our insurance
subsidiaries to adjust their estimates of liability. Our insurance subsidiaries reflect any
adjustments to their liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses in their results of operations
for the period in which our insurance subsidiaries change their estimates.
Our insurance subsidiaries maintain liabilities for the payment of unpaid losses and loss
expenses with respect to both reported and unreported claims. The intent of our insurance
subsidiaries is that their
liabilities for loss expenses will cover the ultimate costs of settling all losses, including
investigation and litigation costs from those losses. Our insurance subsidiaries base the amount
of their liabilities for reported losses primarily upon a case-by-case evaluation of the type of
risk involved, knowledge of the circumstances surrounding each claim and the provisions of our
insurance policies relating to the type of loss. Our insurance subsidiaries determine the amount
of their liabilities for unreported claims and loss expenses on the basis of historical information
by line of insurance. Our insurance subsidiaries account for inflation in the reserving function
through analysis of costs and trends and reviews of historical reserving results. Our insurance
subsidiaries closely monitor their liabilities and recompute them periodically using new
information on reported claims and a variety of statistical techniques. Our insurance subsidiaries
do not discount their liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses.
Reserve estimates can change over time because of unexpected changes in assumptions related to
our insurance subsidiaries external environment and, to a lesser extent, assumptions as to our
insurance subsidiaries internal operations. For example, our insurance subsidiaries have
experienced a decrease in claims frequency on workers compensation claims during the past several
years while claims severity has gradually increased. These trend changes give rise to greater
uncertainty as to the pattern of future loss settlements on workers compensation claims. Related
uncertainties regarding future trends include the cost of medical technologies and procedures and
changes in the utilization of medical procedures. Assumptions related to our insurance
subsidiaries external environment include the absence of significant changes in tort law and the
legal environment that increase liability exposure, consistency in judicial interpretations of
insurance coverage and policy provisions and the rate of loss cost inflation. Internal assumptions
include consistency in the recording of premium and loss statistics, consistency in the recording
of claims, payment and case reserving methodology, accurate measurement of the impact of rate
changes and changes in policy provisions, consistency in the quality and characteristics of
business written within a given line of business and consistency in reinsurance coverage and the
collectibility of reinsured losses, among other items. To the extent our insurance subsidiaries
determine that the factors underlying their assumptions have changed, our insurance subsidiaries
attempt to make appropriate adjustments for such changes in their reserves. Accordingly, our
insurance subsidiaries ultimate liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses will likely differ
from the amount recorded at June 30, 2011. For every 1% change in our estimate of our insurance
subsidiaries liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses, net of reinsurance recoverable, the
effect on our pre-tax results of operations would be approximately $2.2 million.
The establishment of appropriate liabilities is an inherently uncertain process. There can be
no assurance that the ultimate liability of our insurance subsidiaries will not exceed our
insurance subsidiaries unpaid loss and loss expense reserves and have an adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we cannot predict the timing,
frequency and extent of adjustments to our insurance subsidiaries estimated future liabilities,
because the historical conditions and events that serve as a basis for our insurance subsidiaries
estimates of ultimate claim costs may change. As is the case for substantially all property and
casualty insurance companies, our insurance subsidiaries have found it necessary in the past to
increase their estimated future liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses in certain periods,
and
17
in other periods their estimates have exceeded their actual liabilities. Changes in our
insurance subsidiaries estimate of their liabilities for unpaid losses and loss expenses generally
reflect actual payments and the evaluation of information they have received since the prior
reporting date.
Excluding the impact of periodic catastrophic weather events in recent years, our insurance
subsidiaries have generally noted stable amounts in the number of claims incurred and a slight
downward trend in the number of claims outstanding at period ends relative to their premium base.
However, the amount of the average claim outstanding has increased gradually over the past several
years. We attribute this increase to increased litigation trends and economic conditions that have
extended the estimated length of disabilities and contributed to increased medical loss costs and a
general slowing of settlement rates in litigated claims. Our insurance subsidiaries could make
further adjustments to their estimates for liabilities in the future based on the factors we
describe above. However, on the basis of our insurance subsidiaries internal procedures, which
analyze, among other things, their prior assumptions, their experience with similar cases and
historical trends such as reserving patterns, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and
product mix, as well as court decisions, economic conditions and public attitudes, we believe that
our insurance subsidiaries have made adequate provision for their liability for losses and loss
expenses as of June 30, 2011.
Atlantic States participation in the pool with Donegal Mutual exposes Atlantic States to
adverse loss development on the business of Donegal Mutual included in the pool. However, pooled
business represents the predominant percentage of the net underwriting activity of both companies,
and Donegal Mutual and Atlantic States share any adverse risk development of the pooled business
according to their respective participation in the pool. The business in the pool is homogeneous,
and the pooling agreement provides that each company has a percentage share of the entire pool.
Since Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual pool substantially all their business and each company
shares the results according to its respective
participation under the terms of the pooling agreement, the intent of the underwriting pool is to
produce a more uniform and stable underwriting result from year to year for each company than they
might experience individually and to spread the risk of loss between Atlantic States and Donegal
Mutual.
The risk profiles of the business Atlantic States and Donegal Mutual write have historically
been substantially similar and we expect this similarity to continue. The same executive
management and underwriting personnel administer the products, classes of business underwritten,
pricing practices and underwriting standards of Donegal Mutual and our insurance subsidiaries.
18
In addition, Donegal Mutual and our insurance subsidiaries, operating together as the
Donegal Insurance Group, share a combined business plan to achieve market penetration and
underwriting profitability objectives. The products our insurance subsidiaries and Donegal Mutual
offer are generally complementary, thereby allowing Donegal Insurance Group to offer a broader
range of products to a given market and to expand Donegal Insurance Groups ability to service an
entire personal lines or commercial lines account. Distinctions within the products of Donegal
Mutual and our insurance subsidiaries generally relate to specific risk profiles targeted within
similar classes of business, such as preferred tier products compared to standard tier products,
but we do not allocate all of the standard risk gradients to one company. Therefore, the
underwriting profitability of the business the individual companies write directly will vary.
However, because the pool homogenizes the risk characteristics of all business Donegal Mutual and
Atlantic States write directly and each company shares the results according to each companys
participation percentage, each company realizes its percentage share of the underwriting results of
the pool. Our insurance subsidiaries unpaid liability for losses and loss expenses by major line
of business as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commercial lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
$ |
23,599 |
|
|
$ |
22,790 |
|
Workers compensation |
|
|
55,473 |
|
|
|
54,902 |
|
Commercial multi-peril |
|
|
36,555 |
|
|
|
32,961 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
3,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial lines |
|
|
119,727 |
|
|
|
114,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
82,037 |
|
|
|
83,042 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
15,980 |
|
|
|
18,695 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personal lines |
|
|
100,531 |
|
|
|
103,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and personal lines |
|
|
220,258 |
|
|
|
217,897 |
|
Plus reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
182,484 |
|
|
|
165,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
402,742 |
|
|
$ |
383,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
We have evaluated the effect on our insurance subsidiaries unpaid loss and loss expense
reserves and our stockholders equity in the event of reasonably likely changes in the variables we
considered in establishing the loss and loss expense reserves of our insurance subsidiaries. We
established the range of
reasonably likely changes based on a review of changes in accident year development by line of
business and applied those changes to our insurance subsidiaries loss reserves as a whole. The
selected range does not necessarily indicate what could be the potential best or worst case or the
most likely scenario. The following table sets forth the estimated effect on our insurance
subsidiaries unpaid loss and loss expense reserves and our stockholders equity in the event of
reasonably likely changes in the variables we considered in establishing loss and loss expense
reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Loss and |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Adjusted Loss and |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Percentage |
|
Loss Expense |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Loss Expense |
|
|
Change |
|
Change in Loss |
|
Reserves Net of |
|
|
in Stockholders |
|
|
Reserves Net of |
|
|
in Stockholders |
|
and Loss Expense |
|
Reinsurance as of |
|
|
Equity as of |
|
|
Reinsurance as of |
|
|
Equity as of |
|
Reserves Net of |
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Reinsurance |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011(1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010(1) |
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
(10.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
198,232 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
$ |
196,107 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
203,739 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
201,555 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
209,245 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
207,002 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
214,752 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
212,450 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Base |
|
|
|
220,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
225,764 |
|
|
|
-0.9 |
|
|
|
223,344 |
|
|
|
-0.9 |
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
231,271 |
|
|
|
-1.9 |
|
|
|
228,792 |
|
|
|
-1.9 |
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
236,777 |
|
|
|
-2.8 |
|
|
|
234,239 |
|
|
|
-2.8 |
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
242,284 |
|
|
|
-3.7 |
|
|
|
239,687 |
|
|
|
-3.7 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of income tax effect. |
20
Statutory Combined Ratios
We evaluate our insurance operations by monitoring certain key measures of growth and
profitability. In addition to using GAAP-based performance measurements, we also utilize certain
non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are valuable in managing our business and for
comparison to our peers. These non-GAAP measures are underwriting (loss) income, combined ratio and
net premiums written. An insurance companys statutory combined ratio is a standard measure of
underwriting profitability. This ratio is the sum of the ratio of calendar-year incurred losses and
loss expenses to premiums earned; the ratio of expenses incurred for commissions, premium taxes and
underwriting expenses to net premiums written and the ratio of dividends to policyholders to
premiums earned. The combined ratio does not reflect investment income, federal income taxes or
other non-operating income or expense. A ratio of less than 100 percent generally indicates
underwriting profitability. The statutory combined ratio differs from the GAAP combined ratio. In
calculating the GAAP combined ratio, we do not deduct installment payment fees from incurred
expenses, we base the expense ratio on premiums earned instead of premiums written and we adjust
GAAP premiums earned to reflect acquisition accounting adjustments. The following table sets forth
our insurance subsidiaries statutory combined ratios by major line of business for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Commercial lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
95.9 |
% |
|
|
83.4 |
% |
|
|
93.7 |
% |
|
|
90.0 |
% |
Workers compensation |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
Commercial multi-peril |
|
|
107.8 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
Total commercial lines |
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
103.0 |
|
|
|
103.6 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
Homeowners |
|
|
147.4 |
|
|
|
123.0 |
|
|
|
125.4 |
|
|
|
122.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
115.6 |
|
|
|
119.5 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
104.4 |
|
Total personal lines |
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
110.5 |
|
|
|
109.1 |
|
|
|
107.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and personal lines |
|
|
108.7 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
Investments
We make estimates concerning the value of our investments and the recognition of
other-than-temporary declines in the value of our investments. For equity securities, when we
consider a decline in the value of an individual investment to be other than temporary, we write
down the investment to its fair value, and we reflect the amount of the write-down as a realized
loss in our results of operations. We individually monitor all investments for other-than-temporary
declines in value. Generally, if an individual equity security has depreciated in value by more
than 20% of its original cost, and has been in such an unrealized loss position for more than six
months, we assume there has been an other-than-temporary decline in its value. We held 11 equity
securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011. Based upon our analysis of
general market conditions and underlying factors impacting these equity securities, we consider
these declines in value to be temporary. With respect to a debt security that is in an unrealized
loss position, we first assess if we intend to sell the debt security. If we intend to sell the
debt security, we recognize the impairment loss in our results of operations. If we do not intend
to sell the debt security, we determine whether it is more likely than not that we will be required
to sell the security prior to recovery. If it is more likely than not that we will be required to
sell the debt security prior to recovery, we recognize an impairment loss in our results of
operations. If it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell the debt security
prior to recovery, we then evaluate whether a credit loss has occurred. To determine whether a
credit loss has occurred, we compare the amortized cost of the debt security to the present value
of the cash flows we expect to collect. If we expect we will incur a cash flow shortfall, we
consider a credit loss to have occurred. If we consider that a credit loss has occurred, we
consider the impairment to be other than temporary. We then recognize the amount of the impairment
loss related to the credit loss in our results of
21
operations, and we recognize the remaining
portion of the impairment loss in our other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. In
addition, we may write down securities in an unrealized loss position
based on a number of other factors, including the fair value of the investment being significantly
below its cost, whether the financial condition of the issuer of a security is deteriorating, the
occurrence of industry, company and geographic events that have negatively impacted the value of a
security and rating agency downgrades. We determined that no investments with a fair value below
cost had declined on an other-than-temporary basis during the first six months of 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
We present our investments in available-for-sale fixed maturity and equity securities at
estimated fair value. The estimated fair value of a security may differ from the amount that could
be realized if the security was sold in a forced transaction. In addition, the valuation of fixed
maturity investments is more subjective when markets are less liquid, increasing the potential that
the estimated fair value does not reflect the price at which an actual transaction would occur. We
utilize nationally recognized independent pricing services to estimate fair values for our fixed
maturity and equity investments. The pricing services utilize market quotations for fixed
maturity and equity securities that have quoted prices in active markets. For fixed maturity
securities that generally do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing services prepare estimates of
fair value measurements using proprietary pricing applications, which include available relevant
market information, benchmark yields, sector curves and matrix pricing. The pricing services do
not use broker quotes in determining the fair values of our investments. We review the estimates
of fair value the pricing services provide to determine if the estimates we obtain are
representative of market prices based upon our general knowledge of the market, our research
findings related to unusual fluctuations in value and our comparison of such values to execution
prices for similar securities. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we received one
estimate per security from one of the pricing services, and we priced all but an insignificant
amount of our Level 1 and Level 2 investments using those prices. In our review of the estimates
the pricing services provided to us as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not identify
any discrepancies, and we did not make any adjustments to the fair value estimates the pricing
services provided to us. We classified one equity security as Level 3 as of June 30, 2011, which we
describe in Note 9 Fair Value Measurements. We utilized a fair value model that incorporated
significant other unobservable inputs, including estimated volatility, to estimate the equity
securitys fair value. Pursuant to terms of an initial public offering by the issuer of that equity
security, we may not sell this security for a specified period, and the fair value we determined as
of June 30, 2011 reflects this restriction.
Policy Acquisition Costs
Our insurance subsidiaries defer their policy acquisition costs, consisting primarily of
commissions, premium taxes and certain other underwriting costs that vary with and relate primarily
to the production of business. We amortize these costs over the period in which our insurance
subsidiaries earn the related premiums. The method we follow in computing deferred policy
acquisition costs limits the amount of such deferred costs to their estimated realizable value.
This method gives effect to the premiums to be earned, related investment income, losses and loss
expenses and certain other costs we expect to incur as our insurance subsidiaries earn the
premiums.
Results of Operations Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2010
Net Premiums Written. Our insurance subsidiaries net premiums written for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 were $117.9 million, an increase of $15.6 million, or 15.2%, from the $102.4
million of net premiums written for the comparable period of 2010. We primarily attribute the
increase to net premiums written of $12.2 million related to our acquisition of Michigan. Personal
lines net premiums written increased $5.7 million, or 8.2%, for the second quarter of 2011 compared
to the comparable period of 2010. We attribute the increase to our acquisition of Michigan, as
increased reinsurance reinstatement premiums fully offset growth from premium price increases.
Commercial lines net premiums written increased $9.9 million, or 30.1%, for the second quarter of
2011 compared to the comparable period of 2010. The increase included $6.5 million from Michigan,
with the remainder attributable to increased writings of new accounts in the commercial automobile,
commercial multi-peril and workers compensation lines of business.
Net Premiums Earned. Our insurance subsidiaries net premiums earned for the second
quarter of 2011 were $105.0 million, an increase of $12.0 million, or 12.9%, compared to $93.0
million for the comparable period of 2010, reflecting increases in net premiums written during 2010
and 2011 that were partially offset by a $1.0 million amortization adjustment related to the
Michigan acquisition. As of the acquisition date, we eliminated Michigans deferred acquisition
costs and unearned commission income and recorded Michigans obligations and rights under unexpired
insurance and reinsurance contracts at their
22
estimated fair value. We estimated the fair value
adjustments by applying a market ceding commission rate to Michigans unearned premiums and prepaid
reinsurance premiums that resulted in a net reduction of Michigans obligations. We are amortizing
the ceding commission component of the fair value adjustments over the estimated remaining term of
Michigans policies in force as of the acquisition date and recording the
amortization as a reduction in net premiums earned. Our insurance subsidiaries earn premiums
and recognize them as revenue over the terms of their policies, which are one year or less in
duration. Therefore, increases or decreases in net premiums earned generally reflect increases or
decreases in net premiums written in the preceding 12-month period compared to the comparable
period one year earlier.
Investment Income. Our net investment income increased to $5.4 million for the second quarter
of 2011, compared to $5.0 million for the second quarter of 2010. We attribute this increase
primarily to an increase in our average invested assets from $664.9 million for the second quarter
of 2010 to $749.7 million for the second quarter of 2011. The increase in our average invested
assets reflects the additional invested assets we received as part of the Michigan acquisition.
Net Realized Investment Gains. We had net realized investment gains for the second quarter of
2011 of $4.3 million, compared to $2.0 million for the second quarter of 2010. The net realized
investment gains for the second quarter of 2011 resulted primarily from the previously planned
periodic sales of a portion of our holdings of an equity security that we obtained in an initial
public offering and for which a selling restriction expired in April 2011. The net realized
investment gains in 2010 resulted from normal turnover within our investment portfolio. We did not
recognize any impairment losses during the comparable period of 2011 or 2010.
Losses and Loss Expenses. Our insurance subsidiaries loss ratio, which is the ratio of
incurred losses and loss expenses to premiums earned, for the second quarter of 2011 was 80.2%, an
increase from our insurance subsidiaries 73.7% loss ratio for the second quarter of 2010. Our
insurance subsidiaries incurred increased weather-related losses during the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010. Our insurance subsidiaries incurred $13.1 million of
losses, after reinsurance, from 11 catastrophic weather events throughout our operating regions and
an additional $7.4 million of weather-related losses from other storm systems that hit our
insurance subsidiaries operating regions. Our
insurance subsidiaries experienced favorable prior-accident-year loss reserve development of approximately $1.5 million and $500,000 in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Our insurance subsidiaries commercial lines loss
ratio increased to 67.0% for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 61.1% for the second quarter of
2010, primarily due to increases in their commercial automobile and commercial multi-peril loss
ratios. The personal lines loss ratio increased to 86.7% for the second quarter of 2011, compared
to 79.6% for the second quarter of 2010, primarily due to an increase in the homeowners loss ratio.
Underwriting Expenses. Our insurance subsidiaries expense ratio, which is the ratio of
policy acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses to premiums earned, for the second
quarters of 2011 and 2010 was 32.1% and 32.6%, respectively. Our underwriting expenses include
non-deferrable costs related to the acquisition of Michigan of approximately $450,000 for which we
will recognize offsetting ceding commissions over the terms of the policies to which the expenses
related. Our GAAP expense ratio for the comparable period of 2011 reflects this additional
expense.
Combined Ratio. Our insurance subsidiaries combined ratio was 112.4% and 106.4% for the
three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The combined ratio represents the sum of
the loss ratio, expense ratio and dividend ratio, which is the ratio of workers compensation
policy dividends incurred to premiums earned. We attribute the increase in the combined ratio to an
increase in the loss ratio that was primarily weather-related.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the second quarter of 2011 was $558,842, compared to
$168,935 for the second quarter of 2010. The higher interest expense in the 2011 period reflects an
increase in our borrowings under our line of credit.
Income Taxes. Income tax (benefit) expense was ($377,610) for the second quarter of 2011,
representing an effective tax rate of 18.2%, compared to $131,148 for the second quarter of 2010,
representing an effective tax rate of 7.0%. Effective tax rates in both periods represented
estimates based on projected annual taxable income.
Net (Loss) Income and Earnings Per Share. Our net loss for the second quarter of 2011 was
($1.7) million, or ($.07) per share of Class A common stock and ($.06) per share of Class B common
stock, compared to net income of $1.7 million, or $.07 per share of Class A common stock and $.06
per share of Class B common stock, for the second quarter of 2010. We had 20.0 million and 19.9
million shares of our Class A shares outstanding for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010,
respectively. We had 5.6 million
23
Class B shares outstanding for both periods.
Results of Operations Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net Premiums Written. Our insurance subsidiaries net premiums written for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 were $230.1 million, an increase of $34.8 million, or 17.8%, from the $195.3
million of net
premiums written for the comparable period of 2010. We primarily attribute the increase to
net premiums written of $24.5 million related to our acquisition of Michigan. Personal lines net
premiums written increased $13.9 million, or 10.7%, for the first half of 2011 compared to the
first half of 2010. The increase included $11.0 million from Michigan, with the remainder
primarily attributable to pricing increases in the personal automobile and homeowners lines of
business. Commercial lines net premiums written increased $20.9 million, or 32.1%, for the first
half of 2011 compared to the comparable period of 2010. The increase included $13.4 million from
Michigan, with the remainder attributable to increased writings of new accounts in the commercial
automobile, commercial multi-peril and workers compensation lines of business.
Net Premiums Earned. Our insurance subsidiaries net premiums earned were $208.8
million, an increase of $24.4 million, or 13.2%, compared to $184.4 million for the first half of
2010, reflecting increases in net premiums written during 2010 and 2011 that were partially offset
by a $2.8 million amortization adjustment related to the Michigan acquisition. As of the
acquisition date, we eliminated Michigans deferred acquisition costs and unearned commission
income and recorded Michigans obligations and rights under unexpired insurance and reinsurance
contracts at their estimated fair value. We estimated the fair value adjustments by applying a
market ceding commission rate to Michigans unearned premiums and prepaid reinsurance premiums that
resulted in a net reduction of Michigans obligations. We are amortizing the ceding commission
component of the fair value adjustments over the estimated remaining term of Michigans policies in
force as of the acquisition date and recording the amortization as a reduction in net premiums
earned. Our insurance subsidiaries earn premiums and recognize them as revenue over the terms of
their policies, which are one year or less in duration. Therefore, increases or decreases in net
premiums earned generally reflect increases or decreases in net premiums written in the preceding
12 month period compared to the comparable period one year earlier.
Investment Income. Our net investment income increased to $10.7 million for the first six
months of 2011, compared to $9.9 million for the comparable period of 2010. We attribute the
increase primarily to an increase in our average invested assets from $669.5 million for the first
half of 2010 to $750.0 million for the first half of 2011. The increase in our average invested
assets reflects the additional invested assets we received as part of the Michigan acquisition.
Net Realized Investment Gains. Net realized investment gains for the first half of 2011 were
$4.7 million compared to $2.0 million for the comparable period of 2010. The net realized
investment gains for 2011 resulted primarily from the previously planned periodic sales of a
portion of our holdings of an equity security that we obtained in an initial public offering and
for which a selling restriction expired in April 2011. The net realized investment gains in 2010
resulted from normal turnover within our investment portfolio. We did not recognize any impairment
losses during the first half of 2011 or 2010.
Losses and Loss Expenses. Our insurance subsidiaries loss ratio, which is the ratio of
incurred losses and loss expenses to premiums earned, for the first half of 2011 was 75.3%, an
increase from our 74.0% loss ratio for the first half of 2010. Our insurance subsidiaries incurred
increased weather-related losses during the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010.
Our insurance subsidiaries commercial lines loss ratio decreased to 66.6% for the first half of
2011 compared to 69.5% for the first half of 2010, primarily due to decreases in the commercial
multi-peril and workers compensation loss ratios. The personal lines loss ratio increased to 78.8%
for the first half of 2011, compared to 76.3% for the first half of 2010, primarily due to an
increase in the homeowners loss ratio.
Underwriting Expenses. Our insurance subsidiaries expense ratio, which is the ratio of
policy acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses to premiums earned, for the first half of
2011 and 2010 was 32.7% and 32.0%, respectively. Our underwriting expenses include non-deferrable
costs of Michigan in the amount of approximately $1.2 million for which we will recognize
offsetting ceding commissions over the terms of the policies to which the expenses related. Our
GAAP expense ratio for the first half of 2011 reflects this additional expense.
Combined Ratio. Our insurance subsidiaries combined ratio for the first half of 2011 and
2010 was 108.1% and 106.2%, respectively. The combined ratio represents the sum of the loss ratio,
expense ratio
24
and dividend ratio, which is the ratio of workers compensation policy dividends incurred to
premiums earned.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense for the first half of 2011 was $1.0 million, compared
to $353,693 for the first half of 2010. The higher interest expense in the 2011 period reflects an
increase in our borrowings under our line of credit.
Income Taxes. Our income tax expense was $12,589 for the first half of 2011, representing an
effective tax rate of 2.4%, compared to $171,928 for the first half of 2010, representing an
effective tax rate of 14.7%. Effective tax rates in both periods represented estimates based on our
projected annual taxable income.
Net Income and Earnings Per Share. Our net income for the first half of 2011 was $511,947, or
$.02 per share of Class A common stock and $.02 per share of Class B common stock, compared to net
income of $2.0 million, or $.08 per share of Class A common stock and $.07 per share of Class B
common stock, for the first half of 2010. We had 20.0 million and 19.9 million shares of our Class
A shares outstanding for the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. We had 5.6 million Class B
shares outstanding for both periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measure of an entitys ability to secure enough cash to meet its contractual
obligations and operating needs as they arise. Our major sources of funds from operations are the
net cash flows generated from our insurance subsidiaries underwriting results, investment income
and maturing investments.
We have historically generated sufficient net positive cash flow from our operations to fund
our commitments and add to our investment portfolio, thereby increasing future investment returns.
The impact of the pooling agreement between Donegal Mutual and Atlantic States has historically
been cash flow positive because of the consistent underwriting profitability of the pool. We
settle the pool monthly, thereby resulting in cash flows substantially similar to cash flows that
would result from the underwriting of direct business. We have not experienced any unusual
variations in the timing of claim payments associated with the loss reserves of our insurance
subsidiaries. We maintain significant liquidity in our investment portfolio in the form of readily
marketable fixed maturities, equity securities and short-term investments. We structure our
fixed-maturity investment portfolio following a laddering approach, so that projected cash flows
from investment income and principal maturities are evenly distributed from a timing perspective,
thereby providing an additional measure of liquidity to meet our obligations should an unexpected
variation occur in the future. Net cash flows provided by operating activities in the first six
months of 2011 and 2010 were $9.5 million and $4.3 million, respectively, with the change in cash
flows due primarily to decreased claim payments during the first six months of 2011.
As of June 30, 2011, we had $54.5 million in outstanding borrowings under our line of credit
and had the ability to borrow $5.5 million at interest rates equal to M&Ts current prime rate or
the then current LIBOR rate plus between 1.75% and 2.25%, depending on our leverage ratio.
The following table shows our expected payments for significant contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
year |
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability for unpaid losses and
loss expenses of our insurance
subsidiaries
|
|
$ |
220,258 |
|
|
$ |
99,192 |
|
|
$ |
100,016 |
|
|
$ |
9,395 |
|
|
$ |
11,655 |
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
20,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,465 |
|
Borrowings under line of credit
|
|
|
54,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
295,223 |
|
|
$ |
99,192 |
|
|
$ |
154,516 |
|
|
$ |
9,395 |
|
|
$ |
32,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate the date of payment for the net liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses
of our insurance subsidiaries based on historical experience and expectations of future payment
patterns. We show the liability net of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses
to reflect expected
25
future cash flows related to such liability. Amounts Atlantic States assumes pursuant to the
pooling agreement with Donegal Mutual represent a substantial portion of our insurance
subsidiaries gross liability for unpaid losses and loss expenses, and amounts Atlantic States
cedes pursuant to the pooling agreement represent a substantial portion of our insurance
subsidiaries reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss expenses. We include cash
settlement of Atlantic States assumed liability from the pool in monthly settlements of pooled
activity, as we net amounts ceded to and assumed from the pool. Although Donegal Mutual and we do
not anticipate any changes in the pool participation levels in the foreseeable future, any such
change would be prospective in nature and therefore would not impact the timing of expected
payments by Atlantic States for its percentage share of pooled losses occurring in periods prior to
the effective date of such change.
We estimate the timing of the amounts for the borrowings under our line of credit based on
their contractual maturities we discuss in Note 7 Borrowings. Our borrowings under our line of
credit carry interest rates that vary as we discuss in Note 7 Borrowings. Based upon the
interest rates in effect as of June 30, 2011, our annual interest cost associated with our
borrowings under our line of credit is approximately $1.2 million. For every 1% change in the
interest rate associated with our borrowings under our line of credit, the effect on our annual
interest cost would be approximately $545,000.
We estimate the timing of the amounts for the subordinated debentures based on their
contractual maturities. We may redeem the debentures at our option, at par, on dates we discuss in
Note 7 Borrowings. We pay interest on our subordinated debentures at interest rates that vary as
we discuss in Note 7 Borrowings. Based upon the interest rates in effect as of June 30, 2011,
our annual interest cost associated with our subordinated debentures is approximately $868,000. For
every 1% change in the three-month LIBOR rate, the effect on our annual interest cost would be
approximately $200,000.
On February 23, 2009, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program pursuant to
which we may purchase up to 300,000 shares of our Class A common stock at prices prevailing from
time to time in the open market subject to the provisions of applicable SEC rules and in privately
negotiated transactions. We purchased 50,058 and no shares of our Class A common stock under this
program during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We purchased 50,058 and
9,702 shares of our Class A common stock under this program during the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively. We have purchased a total of 67,429 shares of our Class A common stock
under this program from its inception through June 30, 2011.
On July 21, 2011, our board of directors declared quarterly cash dividends of 12 cents per
share for our Class A common stock and 10.75 cents per share for our Class B common stock, payable
on August 15, 2011 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 1, 2011. We are
not subject to any restrictions on our payment of dividends to our stockholders, although there are
state law restrictions on the payment of annual dividends greater than 10% of statutory surplus by
our insurance subsidiaries to us. Our insurance subsidiaries are required by law to maintain
certain minimum surplus on a statutory basis and require prior approval of the applicable
domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities for dividends in excess of 10% of statutory surplus.
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to risk-based capital (RBC) requirements. At December 31,
2010, our insurance subsidiaries capital levels were each substantially above the applicable RBC
requirements. At January 1, 2011, amounts available for distribution as dividends to us from our
insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of their domiciliary insurance regulatory authorities
were $19.2 million from Atlantic States, $0 from Southern, $2.6 million from Le Mars, $4.2 million
from Peninsula, $0 from Sheboygan and $3.7 million from Michigan, all of which remained available
at June 30, 2011.
As of June 30, 2011, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
Equity Price Risk
Our portfolio of marketable equity securities, which we carry on our consolidated balance
sheets at estimated fair value, has exposure to the risk of loss resulting from an adverse change
in prices. We manage this risk by performing an analysis of prospective investments and through
regular reviews of our portfolio by our investment staff.
Credit Risk
Our portfolio of fixed-maturity securities and, to a lesser extent, our portfolio of
short-term investments is subject to credit risk, which we define as the potential loss in market
value resulting from
26
adverse changes in the borrowers ability to repay its debt. We manage this risk by
performing an analysis of prospective investments and through regular reviews of our portfolio by
our investment staff. We also limit the percentage and amount of our total investment portfolio
that we invest in the securities of any one issuer.
Our insurance subsidiaries provide property and casualty insurance coverages through
independent insurance agencies. We bill the majority of this business directly to the insured,
although we bill a portion of our commercial business through licensed insurance agents to whom our
insurance subsidiaries extend credit in the normal course of business.
Because the pooling agreement does not relieve Atlantic States of primary liability as the
originating insurer, Atlantic States is subject to a concentration of credit risk arising from
business ceded to Donegal Mutual. Our insurance subsidiaries maintain reinsurance agreements with
Donegal Mutual and with a number of other major unaffiliated authorized reinsurers.
Impact of Inflation
We establish property and casualty insurance premium rates before we know the amount of unpaid
losses and loss expenses or the extent to which inflation may impact such expenses. Consequently,
our insurance subsidiaries attempt, in establishing rates, to anticipate the potential impact of
inflation.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Our market risk generally represents the risk of gain or loss that may result from the
potential change in the fair value of the securities we hold in our investment portfolio as a
result of fluctuations in prices and interest rates and, to a lesser extent, our debt obligations.
We manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an appropriate relationship between the average
duration of our investment portfolio and the approximate duration of our liabilities, i.e., policy
claims of our insurance subsidiaries and debt obligations.
Our investment mix shifted slightly due to a shift from lower-yielding short-term investments
to fixed maturity investments during the first half of 2011. We have maintained approximately the
same duration of our investment portfolio to our liabilities from December 31, 2010 to June 30,
2011.
There have been no material changes to our quantitative or qualitative market risk exposure
from December 31, 2010 through June 30, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to SEC
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure
that information we, including our consolidated subsidiaries, are required to disclose in our
periodic filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
27
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect materially,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
We base all statements contained in this report that are not historic facts on current
expectations. Such statements are forward-looking in nature (as defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995) and necessarily involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results
could vary materially. The factors that could cause our actual results to vary materially from
forward-looking statements we have previously made, include, but are not limited to, our ability to
maintain profitable operations, the adequacy of the loss and loss expense reserves of our insurance
subsidiaries, business and economic conditions in the areas in which we operate, interest rates,
competition from various insurance and other financial businesses, terrorism, the availability and
cost of reinsurance, legal and judicial developments, changes in regulatory requirements, our
ability to integrate and manage successfully the companies we may acquire from time to time and
other risks that we describe from time to time in our filings with the SEC. We disclaim any
obligation to update such statements or to announce publicly the results of any revisions that we
may make to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or
unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Not applicable.
28
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business, results of operations and financial condition, and, therefore, the value of our
Class A common stock and Class B common stock, are subject to a number of risks. For a description
of certain risks, we refer to Risk Factors in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 14, 2011. There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed in that
Form 10-K Report during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
Units) that May Yet |
|
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
of Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
|
Price Paid per |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Units) Purchased |
|
|
Share (or Unit) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
Month #1 |
|
Class A None |
|
Class A None |
|
Class A None |
|
|
|
|
April 1-30, 2011 |
|
Class B None |
|
Class B None |
|
Class B None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #2 |
|
Class A 23,443 |
|
Class A $13.49 |
|
Class A 23,443 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
May 1-31, 2011 |
|
Class B 300 |
|
Class B $17.49 |
|
Class B 300 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #3 |
|
Class A 26,615 |
|
Class A $13.46 |
|
Class A 26,615 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
June 1-30, 2011 |
|
Class B 100 |
|
Class B $16.31 |
|
Class B 100 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
Class A 50,058 |
|
Class A $13.47 |
|
Class A 50,058 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Class B 400 |
|
Class B $17.20 |
|
Class B 400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We purchased these shares pursuant to our announcement on February 23, 2009
that we will purchase up to 300,000 shares of our Class A common stock at market
prices prevailing from time to time in the open market subject to the provisions of
SEC Rule 10b-18 and in privately negotiated transactions. We may purchase up to
232,571 additional shares of our Class A common stock under this stock repurchase
program. |
|
(2) |
|
Donegal Mutual purchased these shares pursuant to its announcement on
August 17, 2004 that it will, at its discretion, purchase shares of our Class A
common stock and Class B common stock at market prices prevailing from time to time
in the open market subject to the provisions of SEC Rule 10b-18 and in privately
negotiated transactions. Such announcement did not stipulate a maximum number of
shares that may be purchased under this program. |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
29
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Statement of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of
Title 18 of the United States Code |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
Statement of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of
Title 18 of the United States Code |
30
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DONEGAL GROUP INC.
|
|
August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Donald H. Nikolaus
|
|
|
|
Donald H. Nikolaus, President |
|
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
August 9, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Jeffrey D. Miller
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey D. Miller, Senior Vice President |
|
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
31