sv1za
As filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9,
2011
Registration
No. 333-173554
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 3
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
PRIMO WATER
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
5149
|
|
30-0278688
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
104 Cambridge Plaza Drive
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104
(336) 331-4000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
Mark Castaneda
Chief Financial Officer
Primo Water Corporation
104 Cambridge Plaza Drive
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104
(336) 331-4000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent
for service)
Please send copies of all communications to:
|
|
|
D. Scott Coward
|
|
Rachel W. Sheridan
|
K&L Gates LLP
|
|
Latham & Watkins LLP
|
4350 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue
|
|
555 Eleventh Street, NW
|
Suite 300
|
|
Suite 1000
|
Raleigh, NC 27609
|
|
Washington, DC 20004-1036
|
(919) 743-7328
|
|
(202) 637-2200
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this registration statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may
determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell
these securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell securities, and
it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, in any
state or jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
JUNE 9, 2011
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Primo Water
Corporation
6,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
$
per share
We are offering 3,421,369 shares of our common stock and
the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus are
offering an additional 2,578,631 shares of our common
stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of
shares by selling stockholders other than as described in
Use of Proceeds.
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol PRMW. On June 7, 2011 the last reported
sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was
$13.15 per share.
Investing in our common stock
involves risks. See Risk Factors beginning on
page 12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We and a selling stockholder have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 900,000 shares of
common stock to cover over-allotments, if any. Delivery of the
shares is expected to be made on or
about ,
2011.
Neither the Securities and
Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the
adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
Stifel Nicolaus
Weisel
BB&T Capital
Markets
Janney
Montgomery Scott
Signal Hill
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2011.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
EX-23.1 |
EX-23.2 |
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different from that contained in this prospectus. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell, nor is it seeking an offer
to buy, these securities in any state where the offer or sale is
not permitted. The information in this prospectus speaks only as
of the date of this prospectus unless the information
specifically indicates that another date applies, regardless of
the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our
common stock.
Primo®,
Taste
Perfection®,
Zero Waste, Perfect
Tastetm,
www.primowater.com, the Primo logo and other trademarks or
service marks of Primo Water Corporation appearing in this
prospectus are the property of Primo Water Corporation. Trade
names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing
in this prospectus are the property of the respective owners.
Industry
and Market Data
We obtained the industry and market data used throughout this
prospectus through our research, surveys and studies conducted
by third-parties and industry and general publications. Some
data are also based on our good faith estimates, which are
derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as
independent industry publications, government publications,
reports by market research firms or other published sources.
None of the independent industry publications referred to in
this prospectus were prepared on our behalf or at our expense.
The foregoing discussion does not, in any manner, disclaim our
responsibilities with respect to the disclosures contained in
this prospectus.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information about our Company and
this offering contained elsewhere herein and is qualified in its
entirety by the more detailed information and financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. You should
read this entire prospectus carefully, including Risk
Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere
herein, before making an investment decision. In this
prospectus, unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise
requires, the terms Primo, we,
us, our, our Company, or
ours refer to Primo Water Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries together with the Refill Business (as
defined below) that we acquired on November 10, 2010. These
terms do not refer to or include information about our former
subsidiary, Prima Bottled Water, Inc., which was spun off to our
stockholders effective December 31, 2009.
Our
Business
We are a rapidly growing provider of multi-gallon purified
bottled water, self-serve filtered drinking water and water
dispensers sold through major retailers in the United States and
Canada. We believe the market for purified water is growing due
to evolving taste preferences, perceived health benefits and
concerns regarding the quality of municipal tap water. Our
products provide an environmentally friendly, economical,
convenient and healthy solution for consuming purified and
filtered water. On November 10, 2010, in connection with
our initial public offering, we purchased certain assets from
Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan of Canada, Ltd.
(Culligan Canada) related to their business of
providing reverse osmosis water filtration systems that generate
filtered water for refill vending machines and store-use water
services in the United States and Canada. This business also
sells empty reusable water bottles for use at refill vending
machines (such business is referred to herein as the
Refill Business).
Our business is designed to generate recurring demand for our
purified bottled water or self-serve filtered drinking water
through the sale of innovative water dispensers. This business
strategy is commonly referred to as razor-razorblade
because the initial sale of a product creates a base of users
who frequently purchase complementary consumable products. We
believe dispenser owners consume an average of 35 multi-gallon
bottles of water annually. Once our bottled water is consumed
using a water dispenser, empty bottles are exchanged at our
recycling center displays, which provide a recycling ticket that
offers a discount toward the purchase of a new bottle of Primo
purified water (exchange) or they are refilled at a self-serve
filtered drinking water location (refill). Each of our
multi-gallon water bottles can be sanitized and reused up to 40
times before being taken out of use, crushed and recycled,
substantially reducing landfill waste compared to consumption of
equivalent volumes of single-serve bottled water. As of
March 31, 2011, our exchange and refill services were
offered in each of the contiguous United States and in
Canada at approximately 14,600 combined retail locations,
including Lowes Home Improvement, Walmart, Kroger,
Safeway, Albertsons, Winn Dixie, H-E-B Grocery and Walgreens.
We provide major retailers throughout the United States and
Canada with single-vendor solutions for water bottle exchange
and refill vending services, addressing a market demand that we
believe was previously unmet. Our solutions are easy for
retailers to implement, require minimal management supervision
and store-based labor, and provide centralized billing and
detailed performance reports. Our exchange solution offers
retailers attractive financial margins and the ability to
optimize typically unused retail space with our displays. Our
refill solution provides filtered water through the installation
and servicing of reverse osmosis water filtration systems in the
back room of the retailers store location, which minimizes
the usage of the customers retail space. The refill
vending machine, which is typically accompanied by a sales
display containing empty reusable bottles, is located within the
retailer customers floor space. Additionally, due to the
recurring nature of water consumption, retailers benefit from
year-round customer traffic and highly predictable revenue.
We benefit significantly from management experience gained over
the last 15 years in exchange-based businesses, which
enables us to implement best practices and develop and maintain
key business relationships. Prior to founding Primo, our Chief
Executive Officer founded Blue Rhino Corporation, a propane
cylinder exchange business, in 1994 and, with several of our
other key executive officers, led its initial public offering in
1998 and successful sale in 2004. At the time of the sale, we
believe Blue Rhino was a market leader in propane grill cylinder
exchange with over 29,000 retail locations in 49 states.
1
Recent
Developments
Purchase
of Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
of Culligan Canadas assets related to its bulk water
exchange business (the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business). The consideration paid for the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business was approximately $5.4 million,
which consisted of a cash payment of approximately
$1.6 million and the issuance of 307,217 shares of our
common stock, and the assumption of certain specified
liabilities (the Canada Bulk Water Transaction). The
Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business provides refill and delivery
of water in 18-liter containers to commercial retailers in
Canada for resale to consumers.
The acquisition of the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
expands our existing exchange service offering and provides us
with an immediate network of regional operators and major
retailers in Canada (including Walmart, Sobeys, The Home Depot
and Zellers) with approximately 780 retail locations.
Purchase
of Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
On April 11, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
intellectual property and other assets (the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business) from Omnifrio Beverage
Company, LLC (Omnifrio) for total consideration of
up to approximately $13.2 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
a cash payment at closing of $2.0 million;
|
|
|
the issuance at closing of 501,080 shares of our common
stock;
|
|
|
a cash payment of $2.0 million on the
15-month
anniversary of the closing date (subject to our setoff rights in
our Asset Purchase Agreement with Omnifrio and certain of its
members (the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement));
|
|
|
up to $3.0 million in cash milestone payments; and
|
|
|
the assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business.
|
The Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business primarily consists
of technology related to single-serve cold carbonated beverage
appliances and consumable flavor cups, or S-cups,
and
CO2
cylinders used with the appliances to make a variety of cold
beverages.
The acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
serves as an entry point into the U.S. market for
carbonated beverages and the rapidly growing self-carbonating
appliance and single-serve beverage segments. According to a
November 2010 report by independent market analyst Datamonitor,
Carbonated Soft Drinks in the United States, the U.S.
carbonated beverage market generated revenues of $62 billion in
2009 and is the worlds largest carbonated beverage market.
We believe the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
acquisition will allow us to:
|
|
|
|
|
complement our existing water bottle exchange and refill vending
services with a new razor-razorblade business
segment that is designed to generate recurring demand for our
bottled water, consumable flavor cups, or S cups,
and
CO2
cylinders through the sale of our appliances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
broaden the single-vendor solutions that we provide existing
retail relationships;
|
|
|
|
|
|
enhance the attractiveness of our product offering for new
retail relationships;
|
|
|
increase our household adoption and penetration with an enhanced
beverage product offering for consumers;
|
|
|
provide consumers with an innovative alternative to existing
packaged carbonated beverages that includes customization of
flavor, carbonation level and drink volume;
|
|
|
sell additional products that reduce waste in landfills;
|
|
|
utilize our competitive strengths and supply chain to deliver
the same benefits for retailers and consumers as our current
business segments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leverage our existing distribution infrastructure in order to
offer retailers an exchange program for the
CO2
cylinders used with our appliances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leverage our existing set of diverse nationwide retail locations
to provide consumers with convenient access to our carbonated
beverage appliances and consumables; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
enhance our ability to add innovative beverage and hydration
solutions to our line of water dispensers.
|
2
Industry
Overview
We believe there are several trends that support consumer demand
for our water bottle exchange service, refill vending service
and water dispensers including the following:
Emphasis
on Health and Wellness.
As part of a desire to live a healthier lifestyle, we believe
consumers are increasingly focused on drinking greater
quantities of water.
Concerns
Regarding Quality of Municipal Tap Water.
Many consumers purchase bottled water because of concerns
regarding municipal tap water quality. Municipal water is
typically surface water that is treated centrally and pumped to
homes, which can allow contaminants to dissolve into the water
through municipal or household pipes impacting taste and quality.
Growing
Preference for Bottled Water.
We believe consumer preference toward bottled water relative to
tap water continues to grow as bottled water has become accepted
on a mainstream basis. According to an April 2010 report by
independent market analyst Datamonitor, Bottled Water in the
United States, the U.S. bottled water market generated
revenues of $17.1 billion in 2009.
Increasing
Demand for Products with Lower Environmental Impact.
We believe that consumers are increasingly favoring products
with a lower environmental impact with a reuse, recycle,
reduce mindset becoming a common driver of consumer
behavior. Most single-serve polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) water bottles are produced using fossil fuels
and contribute to landfill waste given that only 28% of PET
bottles are recycled according to a November 2010 Environmental
Protection Agency report. Governmental legislation also reflects
these concerns with the passage of bottle bills in
many jurisdictions that tax the purchase of plastic water
bottles, require deposits with the purchase of certain plastic
bottles, prohibit the use of government funds to purchase
plastic water bottles and ban certain plastic bottles from
landfills.
Availability
of an Economical Water Bottle Exchange Service, Refill Vending
Service and Innovative Water Dispensers.
Based on estimates derived from industry data, we believe the
current household penetration rate of multi-gallon water
dispensers is approximately 4% in the United States, with the
vast majority of these households utilizing traditional home
delivery services. We believe the lack of innovation, design
enhancement and functionality and the retail pricing structure
of our competitors dispenser models have prevented greater
household adoption. Compounding these issues, we believe there
previously were no economical water bottle exchange and refill
vending services with major retailer relationships throughout
the United States and Canada to promote dispenser usage beyond
the traditional home delivery model. We believe our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services provide this alternative
and we believe we are currently the only provider delivering
single-vendor solutions to retailers throughout United States
and Canada. We believe there are over 200,000 major retail
locations throughout the United States and Canada that we can
target to sell our dispensers or offer our bottled water
services.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe that Primos competitive strengths include the
following:
Appeal to
Consumer Preferences
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Awareness. Both our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services incorporate the reuse of
existing bottles, recycle water bottles when their lifecycle is
complete and reduce landfill waste and fossil fuel usage
compared to alternative methods of bottled water consumption.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Value. We provide consumers the opportunity for cost
savings when consuming our bottled water compared to both
single-serve bottled water and typical home and office delivery
services. Our water dispensers are sold at attractive retail
prices in order to enhance consumer awareness and adoption of
our water bottle exchange and refill vending services, increase
household penetration and drive sales of our purified and
filtered water.
|
|
|
|
Convenience. Our water bottle exchange and refill
services and water dispensers are available at major retail
locations in the United States and Canada. In addition, our
water bottle exchange and refill services provide consumers the
convenience of either exchanging empty bottles and purchasing
full bottles or refilling the empty bottles at any participating
retailer.
|
|
|
|
Taste. We have dedicated significant time and effort
to develop our water purification process and formulate the
proprietary blend of mineral ingredients included in our Primo
purified water offered through our water bottle exchange
service. We believe that Primo purified water has a silky smooth
taste profile.
|
|
|
|
Health and Wellness. As part of a desire to live a
healthier lifestyle, we believe that consumers are increasingly
focused on drinking more water relative to consumption of other
beverages. As we raise our brand awareness, we believe consumers
will recognize that our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services are an effective option for their water consumption
needs.
|
Key
Retail Relationships Served by Single-Vendor
Solutions.
We believe we are the only provider of water bottle exchange and
refill vending services with single-vendor solutions for
retailers in the United States and Canada. Our direct sales
force actively pursues headquarters-based retail relationships
to better serve our retail customers and to minimize layers of
approval and decision-making with regard to the addition of new
retail locations. Our bottlers and distributors utilize our MIS
tools and processes to optimize their production and
distribution assets while servicing our retail customers. We
believe the combination of our major retail relationships,
unique single-vendor solutions for retail customers, bottling
and distribution network and our MIS tools is difficult to
replicate. We anticipate these factors will facilitate our
introduction of new water-related products in the future.
Ability
to Attract and Retain Consumers.
We offer razor-razorblade products designed to
generate recurring demand for Primo bottled water (the
razorblade) through the initial sale of our innovative water
dispensers (the razor), which include a coupon for a free three-
or five-gallon bottle of Primo purified water. We acquire new
consumers and enhance recycling efforts by accepting most
dispenser-compatible water bottles in exchange for a recycle
ticket discount toward the purchase of a full bottle of Primo
purified water. In addition, we believe our offering
high-quality water dispensers enhances consumer awareness and
adoption of our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services, increases household penetration and drives sales of
our water.
Efficient
Business Model.
Our business model allows us to efficiently offer our solutions
to our retail partners and centrally manage our bottling and
distribution network without a substantial capital investment.
We believe our business processes and MIS tools enable us to
manage the bottling and distribution of our water, servicing of
our refill locations, our product quality, retailer inventory
levels and the return of used bottles on a centralized basis,
leveraging our invested capital and personnel.
Benefit
from Managements Proven Track Record.
We benefit greatly from management experience gained over the
last 15 years in exchange businesses to implement and
refine best practices and develop and maintain key business
relationships. In addition to our Chief Executive Officer, our
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Operations,
Vice President of Products and Vice President of National
Accounts all held comparable positions within the Blue Rhino
organization during its rapid sales and location growth. We
believe this experience combined with our single-vendor
solutions contributed to Walmarts decision to name Primo
category manager for water bottle exchange and dispensers.
4
Our
Growth Strategy
We seek to increase our market share and drive further growth in
our business by pursuing the following strategies:
Increase
Penetration with Existing Retail Relationships and Develop New
Retail Relationships.
We believe we have significant opportunities to increase store
penetration with our existing retail relationships. As of
March 31, 2011, our water bottle exchange service and our
refill vending service were offered at a combined total of
11,500 of our top ten retailers locations. If we were to
offer both our water bottle exchange service and our refill
vending service at each of our top ten retailers
approximate 20,200 individual locations, these top ten retailers
would provide us with a combined total of approximately 40,400
locations to provide our services. As a result, these top ten
retailers present us an opportunity to add either our water
bottle exchange service or our refill vending service at a
combined total of approximately 28,900 additional locations.
There is minimal overlap where our water bottle exchange and
refill vending services are both currently offered. We intend to
further penetrate our other existing retail customers with our
supplementary hydration solutions, which collectively provide us
the opportunity to be present in more than a combined total
50,000 additional water bottle exchange or refill vending
locations.
Our long-term strategy includes increasing our locations to
40,000 to 50,000 retail store locations (which includes new
locations with our existing retail customers) within our primary
retail categories of home centers, hardware stores, mass
merchants, membership warehouses, grocery stores, drug stores
and discount general merchandise stores for our water bottle
exchange service or our refill vending service. We believe that
the introduction of additional hydration solutions to our
product portfolio will allow us to cross-sell products to our
existing and newly-acquired retail customers.
Drive
Consumer Adoption Through Innovative Water Dispenser
Models.
We intend to continue to develop and sell innovative water
dispensers at attractive retail prices, which we believe is
critical to increasing consumer awareness and driving consumer
adoption of our water services. We believe the current household
penetration rate of multi-gallon water dispensers is
approximately 4% in the United States. Our long-term strategy is
to provide multiple water-based beverages from a single Primo
water dispenser, which we believe will lead to greater household
penetration, with consistent promotion of our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services to supply the water. At
December 31, 2010, we offered our water dispensers at
approximately 5,500 locations in the United States, including
Walmart, Target, Kmart, Sams Club, Costco, and Lowes Home
Improvement.
Increase
Same Store Sales.
We sell our water dispensers at minimal margin and provide a
coupon for a free three- or five-gallon bottle of water with the
sale of various water dispensers at certain retailers to drive
consumer demand for our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services. We believe increasing unit sales of Primo water is
dependent on generating greater consumer awareness of the
environmentally friendly and economical aspects of and the
convenience associated with our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services. We expect that our branding, cross-promotion
marketing and sales efforts will result in greater usage of our
water bottle exchange and refill vending services.
Develop
and Install Other Hydration Solutions.
We believe we have significant opportunities to leverage our
bottling and distribution network and our systems and processes
to offer other environmentally friendly, economical, convenient
and healthy hydration solutions to our retail partners without
significant increases in our centralized costs.
Pursue
Strategic Acquisitions to Augment Geographic and Retail
Relationships.
In addition to our recent acquisitions of the Refill Business,
the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business and the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business, we believe opportunities exist
to expand through selective acquisitions, including smaller
water bottle exchange businesses with established retail
accounts, other on-premises self-service
5
water refill vending machine networks and retail accounts, ice
dispenser machine networks and retail accounts and water
dispenser or other beverage-related appliance companies.
Risk
Factors
Our business is subject to numerous risks, as more fully
described in the section entitled Risk Factors
beginning on page 12. You should carefully consider these
risks before deciding to invest in our common stock. These risks
include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur
operating losses in the future.
|
|
|
We depend on a small number of large retailers for most of our
consumer sales. Our arrangements with these retailers for our
bottled water exchange services and sales of our water
dispensers are nonexclusive and may be terminated at will.
|
|
|
We may experience difficulties in integrating the Refill
Business, the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business and the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business with our current
business and may not be able to fully realize all of the
anticipated synergies from these acquisitions.
|
|
|
The success of our business depends on retailer and consumer
acceptance of our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services and water dispensers.
|
|
|
If we lose key personnel, in particular our Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer, Billy D. Prim, or are unable to
recruit qualified personnel, our ability to implement our
business strategies could be delayed or hindered.
|
|
|
In our bottled water business, we depend on independent
bottlers, distributors and suppliers for our business to operate.
|
|
|
We operate in a highly competitive industry, face competition
from companies with far greater resources than we have and could
encounter significant competition from these companies in our
niche market of water bottle exchange services and related
products and refill vending services.
|
|
|
If the water we sell became contaminated, our business could be
seriously harmed.
|
|
|
Interruption or disruption of our supply chain, distribution
channels or bottling and distribution network could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
|
|
|
While many members of our senior management have experience as
executives of a products and exchange services business, there
can be no assurances that this experience and past success will
result in our business becoming profitable.
|
|
|
We depend on key management information systems.
|
Our
Corporate Information
We were incorporated as a Delaware corporation on
October 20, 2004. Our headquarters are located at
104 Cambridge Plaza Drive, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
27104 and our telephone number is
(336) 331-4000.
Our website is www.primowater.com. Information on, or
accessible through, our website is not a part of and is not
incorporated into this prospectus and the inclusion of our
website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual
reference only.
6
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
Primo Water Corporation |
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
3,421,369 shares (3,751,313 shares if the underwriters
exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares to
cover over-allotments, if any) |
|
|
|
Common stock offered by selling stockholders |
|
2,578,631 shares (3,148,687 shares if the underwriters
exercise in full their option to purchase additional shares to
cover over-allotments, if any) |
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
23,353,550 shares (23,683,494 shares if the
underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase
additional shares to cover over-allotments, if any) |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from this offering will
be approximately $42.2 million (or approximately
$46.4 million if the underwriters exercise in full their
option to purchase additional shares to cover over-allotments,
if any). This estimate is based upon an assumed public offering
price of $13.15 per share, which was the last reported sale
price of our common stock on June 7, 2011, less estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses
payable by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of
shares of our common stock by our selling stockholders other
than as described in Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for the
following purposes: |
|
|
|
|
|
$29.0 million to repay borrowings under our
current senior revolving credit facility; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
$13.2 million for working capital and general
corporate purposes, including establishing new store locations
for our water bottle exchange and refill vending services.
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Global Market symbol |
|
PRMW |
|
Conflict of Interest |
|
Branch Banking & Trust Company, an affiliate of
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, LLC, is a lender under our senior revolving credit
facility. Because an affiliate of BB&T Capital Markets, a
division of Scott & Stringfellow, LLC, will receive
more than 5% of the net proceeds of the offering, BB&T
Capital Markets, a division of Scott & Stringfellow,
LLC, is deemed to have a conflict of interest under
Rule 5121 of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc., or FINRA. Because a bona fide public market (as defined in
FINRA Rule 5121) exists for the common stock, a
qualified independent underwriter is not required to be
appointed; however, this offering will be conducted in
accordance with all other applicable provisions of FINRA
Rule 5121. |
7
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this
offering is based on 19,932,181 shares outstanding as of
May 26, 2011 and:
|
|
|
|
|
includes 68,823 shares of unvested restricted common stock;
|
|
|
excludes 475,761 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options;
|
|
|
excludes 82,568 shares of common stock issuable in
connection with outstanding restricted stock units that are to
be settled in shares of common stock;
|
|
|
excludes 846,393 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants;
|
|
|
excludes an additional 457,441 shares of common stock
issuable under our 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan that
are not currently subject to outstanding awards;
|
|
|
excludes an aggregate of 23,958 shares of common stock
issuable under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option to purchase up to 900,000 additional shares of our common
stock from us and a selling stockholder.
|
8
SUMMARY
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER
DATA
The following tables set forth, for the periods and dates
indicated, our summary historical and pro forma consolidated
financial and other data. The summary historical consolidated
financial data as of and for the three years ended
December 31, 2010 was derived from our audited historical
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary historical consolidated financial data
as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2011 was derived from our unaudited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and, in
the opinion of our management, reflect all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of the results for those periods. The results
for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for a full year. The historical
results included here and elsewhere in this prospectus are not
necessarily indicative of future performance or results of
operations.
The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations data for the year ended December 31, 2010 have
been prepared to give pro forma effect to (1) our initial
public offering at $12.00 per share, (2) our entry into and
making of borrowings under our current senior revolving credit
facility, (3) the application of the net proceeds from our
initial public offering and borrowings under our current senior
revolving credit facility for the purposes described in our
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-165452)
and (4) the consummation of our acquisition of the Refill
Business. These pro forma adjustments have been made as if these
events had occurred on January 1, 2010. This data is
subject and gives effect to the assumptions and adjustments
described in the notes accompanying the unaudited pro forma
consolidated statement of operations included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated
statement of operations data is presented for informational
purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual
results of operations that would have been achieved had our
acquisition of the Refill Business and such other transactions
described above been consummated on the dates indicated, and do
not purport to be indicative of the results of operations as of
any future date or for any future period.
9
The summary historical consolidated financial data presented
below represent portions of our consolidated financial
statements and are not complete. You should read this
information in conjunction with Use of Proceeds,
Capitalization, Selected Financial Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Unaudited Pro
Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
34,647
|
|
|
$
|
46,981
|
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,139
|
|
|
$
|
67,053
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
30,776
|
|
|
|
38,771
|
|
|
|
34,213
|
|
|
|
6,922
|
|
|
|
12,113
|
|
|
|
45,534
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,791
|
|
|
|
9,922
|
|
|
|
12,621
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
8,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
48,185
|
|
|
|
52,898
|
|
|
|
54,084
|
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
18,776
|
|
|
|
71,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(13,538
|
)
|
|
|
(5,917
|
)
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
(4,214
|
)
|
Interest (expense) and other income, net
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(1,924
|
)
|
|
|
(5,048
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
(5,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(19,346
|
)
|
|
|
(11,824
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
(5,048
|
)
|
Preferred dividends and beneficial conversion
charge(1)
|
|
|
(19,875
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042
|
)
|
|
|
(9,831
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(39,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
(23.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
|
(3.96
|
)
|
|
|
(2.51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(27.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
19,115
|
|
|
|
19,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In 2008, we recorded a non-cash
beneficial conversion charge or deemed dividend of
$17.6 million on our Series C preferred stock. This
was a result of the adjustment of the conversion ratio on the
Series C preferred stock based upon a formula taking into
account our net sales for the year ending December 31,
2008, which resulted in a conversion ratio of 1:0.184.
|
In 2010, we recorded non-cash charges related to (i) the
effect of the beneficial conversion charge of $2.9 million
recorded upon the completion of the IPO related to the
conversion of the Series B preferred stock at 90% of the
IPO price; (ii) the effect of the beneficial conversion
charge of $2.4 million recorded upon the completion of the
IPO related to the conversion of the Series C preferred
stock at the IPO price of $12.00 per share; (iii) the
effect of the $2.3 million charge related to the
modification of the terms of the common stock warrants
originally issued to the purchasers of the Series B
preferred stock and Series C preferred stock to remove a
provision that accelerated the termination of the warrants
exercise period upon the consummation of the IPO; and
(iv) the effect of the $0.2 million charge related to
the modification of the exercise price of the warrants issued to
the holders of the Series C preferred stock.
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
152,128
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
17,945
|
|
|
|
20,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except location data)
|
|
|
Other information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primo water operations locations at period end
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
Primo water operations units (5 gallon equivalents) sold
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
3,694
|
|
|
|
8,137
|
|
|
|
9,050
|
|
Primo water dispenser units sold
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
11
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should read and consider carefully each of the risks
and uncertainties described below together with the financial
and other information contained in this prospectus before you
decide to invest in our common stock. Our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects may
be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. As a
result, the market price of our common stock could decline and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Relating to Our Business and Industry
We have
incurred operating losses in the past and may incur operating
losses in the future.
We have incurred operating losses in the past and expect to
incur operating losses in the future. As of March 31, 2011,
our accumulated deficit was approximately $115.8 million.
Our losses from continuing operations were $13.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, $8.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, $12.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 and $2.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011. We have not been
profitable since our inception, and we may not become profitable
in the future. Our losses may continue as we incur additional
costs and expenses related to acquired businesses, branding and
marketing, expansion of operations, product development and
development of relationships with strategic business partners.
If our operating expenses exceed our expectations, our financial
performance will be adversely affected. If our sales do not grow
to offset these increased expenses, we may not become
profitable. If we do not achieve sustained profitability, we may
be unable to continue operations.
We depend
on a small number of large retailers for most of our consumer
sales. Our arrangements with these retailers for our bottled
water exchange services and sales of our water dispensers are
nonexclusive and may be terminated at will.
Certain retailers make up a significant percentage of our retail
sales volume, such that if one or more of these retailers were
to materially reduce or terminate its business with us, our
sales would suffer. For 2010, Lowes Home Improvement and
Walmart represented approximately 37% and 21% of our
consolidated net sales, respectively. While we sell a small
percentage of our dispensers directly to consumers through our
online store, the vast majority of our sales are made through
our retail partners.
While we have arrangements with certain retailers for our
products and services, we cannot provide any assurance of any
future sales. None of our significant retail accounts are
contractually bound to offer our water dispensers or water
bottle exchange service. As a result, retailers can discontinue
our dispenser products or water bottle exchange services at any
time and offer a competitors products or services, or none
at all. Additionally, the contractual commitments of the Refill
Business with its retail customers are not long-term in nature.
Continued positive relations with a retailer depend upon various
factors, including price, customer service, consumer demand and
competition. Certain of our retailers have multiple vendor
policies and may seek to offer a competitors products or
services at new or existing locations. If any significant
retailer materially reduces, terminates or is unwilling to
expand its relationship with us, or requires price reductions or
other adverse modifications in our selling terms, our sales
would suffer.
Additionally, most major retailers continually evaluate and
often modify their in-store retail strategies, including product
placement, store
set-up and
design and demographic targets. Our business could suffer
significant setbacks in net sales and operating income if one or
more of our major retail customers modified its current retail
strategy resulting in a termination or reduction of its business
relationship with us, a reduction in store penetration or an
unfavorable product placement within such retailers
stores, any or all of which could materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
We may
experience difficulties in integrating the Refill Business, the
Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business and the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business with our current business and may
not be able to fully realize all of the anticipated synergies
from these acquisitions.
We may not be able to fully realize all of the anticipated
synergies from the acquisition of the Refill Business, the
Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business and the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business. The ability to realize the
12
anticipated benefits of these acquisitions will depend, to a
large extent, on our ability to successfully integrate these
businesses with our water bottle exchange and dispenser
businesses. The integration of independent businesses is a
complex, costly and time-consuming process. In addition, we are
integrating multiple businesses that are different from our
water bottle exchange and dispenser business in several
respects, including with respect to the types of products and
services offered, the manner in which such products and services
are provided to retail customers and pricing dynamics. As a
result, we are devoting significant management attention and
resources to integrating our business practices and operations
with these newly acquired businesses. This integration process
may disrupt the Refill Business, the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business, the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business or our
water bottle exchange and dispenser business and, if implemented
ineffectively, would preclude realization of the full benefits
we expect to realize. The failure to meet the challenges
involved in integrating successfully the operations of these new
businesses with ours or otherwise to realize the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition transactions could cause an
interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, our business
activities or those of the newly acquired businesses, and could
seriously harm our results of operations. In addition, the
overall integration may result in unanticipated problems,
expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, loss of customer
and supplier relationships, and diversion of managements
attention. The challenges we face in integrating the operations
of the newly acquired businesses with ours include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
maintaining employee morale and retaining and hiring key
personnel;
|
|
|
consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures and
eliminating duplicative operations;
|
|
|
minimizing the diversion of managements attention from
ongoing business concerns;
|
|
|
coordinating geographically dispersed organizations;
|
|
|
addressing unanticipated issues in integrating information
technology, communications and other systems; and
|
|
|
managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating
operations.
|
In addition, even if we successfully integrate these new
businesses with our water bottle exchange and dispenser
business, we may not realize the full benefits of the
acquisition transactions, including synergies, cost savings or
sales or growth opportunities. These benefits may not be
achieved within the anticipated timeframe, or at all.
We may
not be able to introduce or sell products to be developed by the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business within the anticipated
timeframe or at all.
The Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business that we recently
acquired primarily consists of technology related to
single-serve cold carbonated beverage appliances and consumable
flavor cups, or S-cups, and
CO2
cylinders used with the appliances to make a variety of cold
beverages. We have not yet introduced these products into the
market and we may never be successful in selling them. We cannot
predict with any certainty that the sale of these products will
ever generate any revenues, and a market for these products may
never develop. Our introduction and sale of these products into
the market may also be negatively affected because we have not
previously participated in the carbonated beverage segment of
the nonalcoholic beverage industry, which could put our products
at a disadvantage compared to those sold by our competitors,
many of which are leading consumer products companies with
substantially greater financial and other resources than we have
and many of which have established a strong brand presence with
consumers.
Our introduction of these products into the market may also be
adversely affected by certain factors that are out of our
control, including the willingness of market participants to try
new products, the emergence of newer technologies and the cost
competitiveness of our products. In addition, our efforts to
introduce these products will cause us to incur costs, including
significant advertising and marketing expenses, before we
generate any revenues and may cause a diversion of management
time and attention. If the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage
Business products do not achieve market acceptance, this could
have a material adverse effect on our business, result of
operations and financial condition.
The
success of our business depends on retailer and consumer
acceptance of our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services and water dispensers.
We are a consumer products and services company operating in the
highly-competitive bottled water market and rely on continued
consumer demand or preference for our products and services. To
generate sales and profits, we
13
must sell products that appeal to retailers and to consumers.
Our future success depends on consumer acceptance, particularly
at the household level, of our bottled water products, water
bottle exchange and refill vending services and water
dispensers. There is no guarantee that there will be significant
market acceptance of our water bottle exchange or refill vending
services or that we will be successful in selling our water
dispensers on a scale necessary to achieve sustained
profitability.
The market for bottled water related products and services is
evolving rapidly and we may not be able to accurately assess the
size of the market or trends that may emerge and affect our
business. Consumer preference can change due to a variety of
factors, including social trends, negative publicity and
economic changes. If we are unable to convince current and
potential retail customers and individual consumers of the
advantages of our products and services, our ability to sell our
bottled water products and water dispensers will be limited.
Consumer acceptance also will affect, and be affected by, our
existing retail partners and potential new retail
partners decision to sell our products and services and
their perception of the likelihood of consumers purchasing our
products and services. Even if retail customers purchase our
products or services, there is no guarantee that they will be
successful in selling our products or services to consumers on a
scale necessary for us to achieve sustained profitability. Any
significant changes in consumer preferences for purified bottled
water could result in reduced demand for our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services and our water dispensers
and erosion of our competitive and financial position.
If we
lose key personnel or are unable to recruit qualified personnel,
our ability to implement our business strategies could be
delayed or hindered. In addition, we may not be able to attract
and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our
planned growth.
We are highly dependent upon the services of our senior
management because of their experience, industry relationships
and knowledge of the business. We are particularly dependent on
the services of Billy D. Prim, our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer. We do not have a formal succession plan in
place for Mr. Prim. While our employment agreements with
members of our senior management include customary
confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants,
there can be no assurance that such provisions will be
enforceable or adequately protect us.
The loss of one or more of our key employees could seriously
harm our business and we may not be able to attract and retain
individuals with the same or similar level of experience or
expertise. We face competition for qualified employees from
numerous sources and there can be no assurance that we will be
able to attract and retain qualified personnel on acceptable
terms. Our ability to recruit and retain such personnel will
depend upon a number of factors, such as our results of
operations, prospects and the level of competition then
prevailing in the market for qualified personnel. Failure to
recruit and retain such personnel could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In our
bottled water business, we depend on independent bottlers,
distributors and suppliers for our business to
operate.
We are and will continue to be for the foreseeable future,
substantially dependent on independent bottlers, distributors
and suppliers to bottle and deliver our bottled water products
and provide our water bottle exchange service to our retail
customers. We do not have our own manufacturing facilities to
produce bottled water products. We are and will continue to be
for the foreseeable future, entirely dependent on third parties
to supply the bottle pre-forms, bottles, water and other
materials necessary to operate our bottled water business. We
rely on third-party supply companies to manufacture our three-
and five-gallon water bottles and deliver them to our bottlers.
In turn, we rely on bottlers to properly purify the water,
include our mineral enhancements and bottle the finished product
without contamination and pursuant to our quality standards and
preparation procedures. Finally, we rely upon our distributors
to deliver bottled water to our retail partners in a timely
manner, accurately enter information regarding the delivery of
the bottles into our management information system, manage our
recycling center displays and return used bottles to the
bottlers to be sanitized or crushed and recycled.
We can make no assurance that we will be able to maintain these
third-party relationships or establish additional relationships
as necessary to support growth and profitability of our business
on economically viable terms. As
14
independent companies, these bottlers, distributors and
suppliers make their own business decisions. Suppliers may
choose not to do business with us for a variety of reasons,
including competition, brand identity, product standards and
concerns regarding our economic viability. They may have the
right to determine whether, and to what extent, they produce and
distribute our products, our competitors products and
their own products. Some of the business for these bottlers,
distributors and suppliers comes from producing or selling our
competitors products. These bottlers, distributors and
suppliers may devote more resources to other products or take
other actions detrimental to our brands. In addition, their
financial condition could also be adversely affected by
conditions beyond our control and our business could suffer. In
addition, we will face risks associated with any bottlers
or distributors failure to adhere to quality control and
service guidelines we establish or failure to ensure an adequate
and timely supply of product and services at retail locations.
Any of these factors could negatively affect our business and
financial performance. If we are unable to obtain and maintain a
source of supply for bottles, water and other materials, our
business will be materially and adversely affected.
In our
bottled water business, if our distributors do not perform to
our retailers expectations, if we encounter difficulties
in managing our distributor operations or if we or our
distributors are not able to manage growth effectively, our
retail relationships may be adversely impacted and business may
suffer.
We rely on our distributors to deliver our three- and
five-gallon bottled water and provide our water bottle exchange
service to retailers. Accordingly, our success depends on our
ability to manage our retail relationships through the
performance of our distributor partners. The majority of our
current distributors are independent and we exercise only
limited influence over the resources they devote to delivery and
exchange of our three- and five-gallon water bottles. Our
success depends on our ability to establish and maintain
distributor relationships and on the distributors ability
to operate viable businesses. We can provide no assurance that
we will be able to maintain such relationships or establish
additional relationships as necessary to support growth and
profitability of our business on economically viable terms. Our
retailers impose demanding service requirements on us and we
could suffer a loss of consumer or retailer goodwill if our
distributors do not adhere to our quality control and service
guidelines or fail to ensure an adequate and timely supply of
bottled water at retail locations. The poor performance of a
single distributor to a major retailer could jeopardize our
entire relationship with that retailer and cause our bottled
water sales and exchange service to suffer. In addition, the
number of retail locations offering our water bottle exchange
service and our corresponding sales have grown significantly
over the past several years along with our national distributor
network. Accordingly, our distributors must be able to
adequately service an increasing number of retail accounts. If
we or our distributors fail to manage our growth effectively,
our bottled water sales and exchange service may suffer.
We are
dependent on the network of distributors of the Refill Business
and we may be unable to maintain these relationships or achieve
the cost savings we anticipate creating with the
post-acquisition consolidation of this network.
The Refill Business is dependent on its network of primarily
independent distributors to provide a number of services with
respect to its reverse osmosis water systems. We are party to a
dealer services agreement with Culligan International Company
(Culligan International) pursuant to which we have
access to this network of distributors through December 2011.
There can be no assurance that the distributors will continue to
provide these services after the termination of the dealer
services agreement.
Additionally, we are in the process of consolidating the current
network of approximately 500 distributors in order to achieve
cost savings. There can be no assurance that we can successfully
consolidate the current network of distributors or that we will
be able to achieve any cost savings if we are able to
consolidate the network. If we are unable to rely on the service
provider network of the Refill Business to continue providing
the services currently provided or we are unable to achieve cost
savings through a consolidation of this network, we may not
realize the full benefits of the acquisition of the Refill
Business and our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows could suffer.
15
If the
distributors of the Refill Business do not perform to retailer
expectations, its retail relationships may be adversely impacted
and business may suffer.
The Refill Business primarily relies on third-party distributors
to install, maintain and repair the reverse osmosis water
systems at its retail customers locations. These
third-party distributors are also responsible for providing
retail customer training with respect to the reverse osmosis
water systems, submitting water for testing and conducting
monthly meter readings to determine water usage for billing
purposes. Accordingly, the success of the Refill Business
depends on its ability to manage its retail relationships
through the performance of these distributors. The significant
majority of these distributors are independent dealers and the
Refill Business exercises only limited influence over the
resources they devote to their responsibilities with respect to
its retail customers. The success of the Refill Business
currently depends on its ability to establish and maintain
relationships with these third-party distributors and on the
distributors ability to operate viable businesses. There
can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to maintain
such relationships. Retail customers of the Refill Business
impose demanding service requirements and we could suffer a loss
of retailer or consumer goodwill if these distributors do not
perform to the retail customers expectations. The poor
performance of a single service provider to a major retailer
could jeopardize our entire relationship with that retailer
potentially preventing future installations at additional retail
locations and causing sales to suffer.
We
operate in a highly competitive industry, face competition from
companies with far greater resources than we have and could
encounter significant competition from these companies in our
niche market of water bottle exchange services and related
products and refill vending services.
We participate in the highly competitive bottled water segment
of the nonalcoholic beverage industry. While the industry is
dominated by large and well-known international companies,
numerous smaller firms are also seeking to establish market
niches. In our business model, we not only offer multi-gallon
bottled water but also provide consumers the ability to exchange
their used containers as part of our exchange service or refill
their used containers as part of our refill vending service.
While we are aware of a few direct competitors that operate
water bottle exchange networks at retail, we believe they
operate on a much smaller scale than we do and we believe they
do not have equivalent MIS tools or bottling and distribution
capabilities to effectively support major retailers nationwide.
Competitive factors with respect to our business include
pricing, taste, advertising, sales promotion programs, product
innovation, increased efficiency in production and distribution
techniques, the introduction of new packaging and brand and
trademark development and protection.
Our primary competitors in our bottled water business include
Nestlé, The
Coca-Cola
Company, PepsiCo, Dr Pepper Snapple Group and DS Waters of
America. While none of these companies currently offers a
nationwide water bottle exchange service at retail, Nestlé
and DS Waters of America offer this service on a regional basis.
Many of these competitors are leading consumer products
companies, have substantially greater financial and other
resources than we do, have established a strong brand presence
with consumers and have established relationships with
retailers, manufacturers, bottlers and distributors necessary to
start an exchange at retail locations nationwide should they
decide to do so. The Refill Business faces direct competition in
its industry and for its retail customers from Glacier Water
Services, Inc., which has a strong brand presence and greater
financial and other resources than we have. In addition to
competition between companies within the bottled water industry,
the industry itself faces significant competition from other
non-alcoholic beverages, including carbonated and non-carbonated
soft drinks and waters, juices, sport and energy drinks,
coffees, teas and spring and tap water.
We also compete directly and indirectly in the water dispenser
marketplace. While we have had recent success in our sales of
water dispensers to retailers, there are many large consumer
products companies with substantially greater financial and
other resources than we do, a larger brand presence with
consumers and established relationships with retailers that
could decide to enter the marketplace. Should any of these
consumer products companies so decide to enter the water
dispenser marketplace, sales of our water dispensers could be
materially and adversely impacted, which, in turn, could
materially and adversely affect our sales of bottled water.
Finally, our bottled water business faces competition from other
methods of purified water consumption such as countertop
filtration systems, faucet mounted filtration systems, in-line
whole-house filtration systems, water
16
filtration dispensing products such as pitchers and jugs,
standard and advanced feature water coolers and
refrigerator-dispensed filtered and unfiltered water.
In addition, as a result of our acquisition of the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business, we now participate in the
highly-competitive carbonated beverage segment of the
nonalcoholic beverage industry and will face significant
competition as we enter this market from competitors that are
leading consumer products companies, have substantially greater
financial and other resources than we do, have established a
strong brand presence with consumers and have established
relationships with retailers, manufacturers, bottlers and
distributors.
In our
water dispenser business, because all of our dispensers are
manufactured in China, a significant disruption in the
operations of these manufacturers or political unrest in China
could materially adversely affect us.
We have only three manufacturers of water dispensers. Any
disruption in production or inability of our manufacturers to
produce quantities of water dispensers adequate to meet our
needs could significantly impair our ability to operate our
water dispenser business on a
day-to-day
basis. Our manufacturers are located in China, which exposes us
to the possibility of product supply disruption and increased
costs in the event of changes in the policies of the Chinese
government, political unrest or unstable economic conditions in
China or developments in the U.S. that are adverse to
trade, including enactment of protectionist legislation. In
addition, our dispensers are shipped directly from the
manufacturer to our retail partners. Although we routinely
inspect and monitor our manufacturing partners activities
and products, we rely heavily upon their quality controls when
producing and delivering the dispensers to our retail partners.
Any of these matters could materially adversely affect our water
dispenser business and, as a result, our profitability.
If the
water we sell became contaminated, our business could be
seriously harmed.
We have adopted various quality, environmental, health and
safety standards. However, our products may still not meet these
standards or could otherwise become contaminated. A failure to
meet these standards or contamination could occur in our
operations or those of our bottlers, distributors or suppliers.
Such a failure or contamination could result in expensive
production interruptions, recalls and liability claims.
Moreover, negative publicity could be generated even from false,
unfounded or nominal liability claims or limited recalls. Any of
these failures or occurrences could negatively affect our
business and financial performance.
Interruption
or disruption of our supply chain, distribution channels or
bottling and distribution network could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our ability and that of our business partners, including
suppliers, bottlers, distributors and retailers, to manufacture,
sell and deliver products and services is critical to our
success. Interruption or disruption of our supply chain,
distribution channels or service network due to unforeseen
events, including war, terrorism and other international
conflicts, public health issues, natural disasters such as
earthquakes, fires, hurricanes or other adverse weather and
climate conditions, strikes and other labor disputes, whether
occurring in the United States or abroad, could impair our
ability to manufacture, sell or deliver our products and
services.
The
consolidation of retail customers may adversely impact our
operating margins and profitability.
Our customers, such as mass merchants, supermarkets, warehouse
clubs, food distributors and drug and pharmacy stores, have
consolidated in recent years and consolidation may continue. As
a result of these consolidations, our large retail customers may
seek lower pricing or increased promotions from us. If we fail
to respond to these trends in our industry, our volume growth
could slow or we may need to lower prices or increase trade
promotions and consumer marketing for our products and services,
both of which would adversely affect our financial results.
These retailers may use floor or shelf space currently used for
our products and services for their own private label products
and services. In addition, retailers are increasingly carrying
fewer brands in any one category and our results of operations
will suffer if we are not selected by our significant customers
to remain a
17
vendor. In the event of consolidation involving our current
retailers, we may lose key business if the surviving entities do
not continue to purchase products or services from us.
While
many members of our senior management have experience as
executives of a products and exchange services business, there
can be no assurances that this experience and past success will
result in our business becoming profitable.
Many members of our senior management have had experience as
senior managers of a company engaged in the supply, distribution
and exchange of propane gas cylinders. While the business model
for that company and the model for our business are similar, the
propane gas industry and the bottled water industry are very
different. For example, there are no assurances that consumer
demand will exist for our bottled water products, water bottle
exchange or refill vending services or water dispensers
sufficient to enable us to be profitable. While we believe our
business model will be successful, any similarity between our
business model and that of our senior managements
predecessor employer should not be viewed as an indication that
we will be profitable.
We depend
on key management information systems.
We depend on our management information systems (MIS) to process
orders, manage inventory and accounts receivable, maintain
distributor and customer information, maintain cost-efficient
operations and assist distributors in delivering products and
services on a timely basis. Any disruption in the operation of
our MIS tools, the loss of employees knowledgeable about such
systems, the termination of our relationships with third-party
MIS partners or our failure to continue to effectively modify
such systems as business expands could require us to expend
significant additional resources or to invest additional capital
to continue to manage our business effectively, and could even
affect our compliance with public reporting requirements.
Additionally, our MIS tools are vulnerable to interruptions or
other failures resulting from, among other things, natural
disasters, terrorist attacks, software, equipment or
telecommunications failures, processing errors, computer
viruses, hackers, other security issues or supplier defaults.
Security, backup and disaster recovery measures may not be
adequate or implemented properly to avoid such disruptions or
failures. Any disruption or failure of these systems or services
could cause substantial errors, processing inefficiencies,
security breaches, inability to use the systems or process
transactions, loss of customers or other business disruptions,
all of which could negatively affect our business and financial
performance.
Our
results of operations could be adversely affected as a result of
the impairment of goodwill or other intangibles.
When we acquire a business, we record an asset called
goodwill equal to the excess amount we pay for the
business, including liabilities assumed, over the fair value of
the tangible and intangible assets of the business we acquire.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (GAAP), we must
identify and value intangible assets that we acquire in business
combinations, such as customer arrangements, customer
relationships and non-compete agreements, that arise from
contractual or other legal rights or that are capable of being
separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold,
transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged. The fair value of
identified intangible assets is based upon an estimate of the
future economic benefits expected to result from ownership,
which represents the amount at which the assets could be bought
or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, other
than in a forced or liquidation sale.
GAAP provides that goodwill and other intangible assets that
have indefinite useful lives not be amortized, but instead must
be tested at least annually for impairment, and intangible
assets that have finite useful lives should continue to be
amortized over their useful lives. GAAP also provides specific
guidance for testing goodwill and other
non-amortized
intangible assets for impairment. GAAP requires management to
make certain estimates and assumptions to allocate goodwill to
reporting units and to determine the fair value of reporting
unit net assets and liabilities, including, among other things,
an assessment of market conditions, projected cash flows,
investment rates, cost of capital and growth rates, which could
significantly impact the reported value of goodwill and other
intangible assets. Fair value is determined using a combination
of the discounted cash flow, market multiple and market
capitalization valuation approaches. Absent any impairment
indicators, we perform our impairment tests annually during the
fourth quarter.
18
We review our intangible assets with definite lives for
impairment when events or changes in business conditions
indicate the carrying value of the assets may not be
recoverable, as required by GAAP. An impairment of intangible
assets with definite lives exists if the sum of the undiscounted
estimated future cash flows expected is less than the carrying
value of the assets. If this measurement indicates a possible
impairment, we compare the estimated fair value of the asset to
the net book value to measure the impairment charge, if any.
We cannot predict the occurrence of certain future events that
might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill and other
intangible assets that totaled $88.5 million at
December 31, 2010. Such events include strategic decisions
made in response to economic and competitive conditions, the
impact of the economic environment on our customer base,
material negative changes in our relationships with material
customers and other parties breaching their contractual
obligations under non-compete agreements. Future impairments, if
any, will be recognized as operating expenses.
If we are
unable to build and maintain our brand image and corporate
reputation, our business may suffer.
We are a relatively new company, having been formed in late 2004
and commenced operations in June 2005. Our success depends on
our ability to build and maintain the brand image for our
existing products and services and effectively build the brand
image for any new products. We cannot assure you, however, that
any additional expenditures on advertising and marketing will
have the desired impact on our products brand image and on
consumer preferences. Actual or perceived product quality issues
or allegations of product contamination, even if false or
unfounded, could tarnish the image of our brand and may cause
consumers to choose other products. Allegations of product
defects or product contamination, even if untrue, may require us
from time to time to recall a product from all of the markets in
which the affected product was distributed. Product recalls
would negatively affect our profitability and brand image. Also,
adverse publicity surrounding water usage and any campaigns by
activists attempting to connect our system to environmental
issues, water shortages or workplace or human rights violations
in certain developing countries in which we or our business
partners operate, could negatively affect our overall reputation
and our products acceptance by consumers.
Adverse
weather conditions could negatively impact our
business.
Unseasonable or unusual weather may negatively impact demand for
our products. The sales of our bottled water products, water
dispensers and refill vending services are influenced to some
extent by weather conditions in the markets in which we operate.
Unusually cool or rainy weather may reduce temporarily the
demand for our products and contribute to lower sales, which
would have an adverse effect on our results of operations for
such periods.
We may be
required to make substantial capital expenditures in connection
with our recent acquisition transactions.
Maintenance of refill equipment located at the stores of current
and future retail customers of the Refill Business may be
substantially costlier than we currently anticipate and there
may be unanticipated capital expenditures in connection with our
continued operations the Refill Business and the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business. Additionally, the development of a
market-ready Omnifrio single-serve cold carbonated beverage
appliance may be substantially costlier than we currently
anticipate.
We may incur substantial capital expenditures in growing each of
these new businesses. If we are required to make greater than
anticipated capital expenditures in connection with continued
operations or growth of any of these businesses, our business,
financial condition and cash flows could be materially and
adversely affected.
We are
required to rebrand the Refill Business under our Primo or
another new brand and the rebranding may be more costly than
anticipated or may fail to achieve its intended
result.
We are required to rebrand the Refill Business to eliminate all
ties to Culligan International before November 10, 2011.
Our rebranding efforts may not achieve their intended results,
which include increasing our retail business. Our rebranding
efforts could turn out to be substantially more expensive than
we currently anticipate, which would materially adversely affect
our results of operations. Additionally, the rebranding of the
Refill Business could result in the loss of current Refill
Business retail customers and consumers, which would prevent us
from realizing the full
19
benefits of the Refill Acquisition and would negatively affect
our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
The
Refill Business and the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business have
substantial Canadian operations and are exposed to fluctuations
in currency exchange rates and political
uncertainties.
The Refill Business and the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
have substantial Canadian operations, and as a result, we are
subject to risks associated with doing business internationally.
Risks inherent to operating internationally include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in a countrys economic or political conditions;
|
|
|
changes in foreign currency exchange rates; and
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements.
|
To the extent the United States dollar strengthens against the
Canadian dollar, our foreign revenues and profits will be
reduced when translated into United States dollars.
Water
scarcity and poor quality could negatively impact our long-term
profitability.
Water is a limited resource facing unprecedented challenges from
overexploitation, population growth, increasing pollution, poor
management and climate change. As demand for water continues to
increase and as water becomes scarcer and the quality of
available water deteriorates, our business may incur increasing
costs or face capacity constraints which could adversely affect
our profitability or net sales in the long run.
We may
pursue acquisitions and investments in new product lines,
businesses or technologies that involve numerous risks, which
could disrupt our business or adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
In addition to our recent acquisitions of the Refill Business,
the Culligan Bulk Water Exchange Business and the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business, we may in the future acquire or
invest in new product lines, businesses or related technologies
to expand our current bottled water products and services.
Acquisitions or investments in new product lines, businesses or
related technologies present a number of potential risks and
challenges that could disrupt our business operations, increase
our operating costs or capital expenditure requirements and
reduce the value of the acquired product line, business or
related technology. For example, if we identify an acquisition
candidate, we may not be able to successfully negotiate or
finance the acquisition on favorable terms or at all. The
process of negotiating acquisitions and integrating acquired
products, services, technologies, personnel or businesses might
result in significant transaction costs, operating difficulties
or unexpected expenditures and might require significant
management attention that would otherwise be available for
ongoing development of our business. If we are successful in
consummating an acquisition, we may not be able to integrate the
acquired product line, business or technology into our existing
business and products and we may not achieve the anticipated
benefits of any acquisition. Furthermore, potential acquisitions
and investments may divert our managements attention,
require considerable cash outlays and require substantial
additional expenses that could harm our existing operations and
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. To complete future acquisitions, we may issue equity
securities, incur debt, assume contingent liabilities or incur
amortization expenses and write-downs of acquired assets, any of
which could dilute the interests of our stockholders or
adversely affect our profitability or cash flow.
Changes
in taxation requirements could affect our financial
results.
We are subject to income tax in the numerous jurisdictions in
which we generate net sales. In addition, our water dispensers
are subject to certain import duties and sales taxes in certain
jurisdictions in which we operate. Increases in income tax rates
could reduce our after-tax income from affected jurisdictions,
while increases in indirect taxes could affect our
products and services affordability and therefore
reduce demand for our products and services.
20
Our
ability to use net operating loss carryforwards in the United
States may be limited.
As of December 31, 2010, we had net operating losses of
approximately $66 million for federal income tax purposes,
which expire at various dates through 2030. To the extent
available and not otherwise utilized, we intend to use any net
operating loss carryforwards to reduce the U.S. corporate
income tax liability associated with our operations.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of
net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset
taxable income when a corporation has undergone certain changes
in stock ownership. While we believe that an annual limit will
be imposed by Section 382 as a result of a prior ownership
change, we expect to fully utilize our net operating loss
carryforwards during their carryforward periods. However, to the
extent our use of net operating loss carryforwards is
significantly limited as a result of this ownership change or
any subsequent ownership changes, an additional portion of our
income could be subject to U.S. corporate income tax
earlier than it would if we were able to use net operating loss
carryforward without limitation, which could result in lower
profits.
Our
financial results may be negatively impacted by the recent
global financial events.
The recent global financial events have resulted in the
consolidation, failure or near failure of a number of
institutions in the banking, insurance and investment banking
industries and have substantially reduced the ability of
companies to obtain financing. Additionally, geopolitical
tensions in the Middle East and other foreign regions have
caused great uncertainty in the financial markets and led to
escalating fuel prices. These events could have a number of
different effects on our business, including:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in consumer spending, which could result in a
reduction in our sales volume;
|
|
|
a shift in the purchasing habits of our target consumers;
|
|
|
a negative impact on the ability of our retail customers to
timely pay their obligations to us, thus reducing our cash flow;
|
|
|
increased costs related to our distribution channels;
|
|
|
a negative impact on the ability of our vendors to timely supply
materials; and
|
|
|
an increased likelihood that our lender may be unable to honor
its commitments under our new senior revolving credit facility.
|
Other events or conditions may arise directly or indirectly from
the global financial events that could negatively impact our
business.
Risks
Relating to Regulatory and Legal Issues
Our
inability to protect our intellectual property, or our
involvement in damaging and disruptive intellectual property
litigation, could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition or result in the loss of use
of products or services.
We have filed certain patent applications and trademark
registration applications and intend to seek additional patents,
to develop additional trademarks and seek federal registrations
for such trademarks and to develop other intellectual property.
We consider our Primo name and related trademarks and our other
intellectual property to be valuable to our business and the
establishment of a national branded bottled water exchange
program. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright,
trademark and trade secret laws and other arrangements to
protect our proprietary rights and could incur substantial
expense to enforce our rights under such laws. A number of other
companies, however, use trademarks similar or identical to the
Primo®
mark to identify their products, and we may not be able to stop
these other companies from using such trademarks. The
requirement to change any of our trademarks, service marks or
trade names could entail significant expense and result in the
loss of any goodwill associated with that trademark, service
mark or trade name. While we have filed, and intend to file in
the future, patent applications, where appropriate, and to
pursue such applications with the patent authorities, we cannot
be sure that patents will be issued on such applications or that
any issued patents will not be successfully contested by third
parties. Also, since issuance of a patent does not prevent other
companies from using alternative, non-infringing technology or
designs, we cannot be sure that any issued patents, or patents
that may be issued to others and licensed to us, will provide
significant or any commercial protection, especially as new
competitors enter the market.
21
In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets
and other non-patented proprietary information relating to our
product development, business processes and operating
activities. We seek to protect this information through
appropriate efforts to maintain its secrecy, including
confidentiality agreements. We cannot be sure that these efforts
will be successful or that confidentiality agreements will not
be breached. We also cannot be sure that we would have adequate
remedies for any breach of such agreements or other
misappropriation of our trade secrets, or that our trade secrets
and proprietary know-how will not otherwise become known or be
independently discovered by others.
Where necessary, we may initiate litigation to enforce our
patent or other intellectual property rights. Any such
litigation may require us to spend a substantial amount of time
and money and could distract management from its
day-to-day
operations. Moreover, there is no assurance that we will be
successful in any such litigation or that such litigation will
not result in successful counterclaims or challenges to the
validity of our intellectual property rights. Our failure to
successfully develop intellectual property, or to successfully
obtain, maintain and enforce patents, trademarks and other
intellectual property, could affect our ability to distinguish
our products and services from those of our competitors and
could cause our sales to suffer.
Our business and our ability to provide products and services
may be impaired by claims that we infringe the intellectual
property rights of others. Vigorous protection and pursuit of
intellectual property rights characterize the consumer products
industry. These traits can result in significant, protracted and
materially expensive litigation. In addition, parties making
infringement and other claims may be able to obtain injunctive
or other equitable relief that could effectively block our
ability to provide our products, services or utilize our
business methods and could cause us to pay substantial damages.
In the event of a successful claim of infringement, we may need
to obtain one or more licenses from third parties, which may not
be available at a reasonable cost, or at all. It is possible
that our intellectual property rights may not be valid or that
we may infringe existing or future proprietary rights of others.
Any successful infringement claims could subject us to
significant liabilities, require us to seek licenses on
unfavorable terms, prevent us from manufacturing or selling
products, providing services and utilizing business methods and
require us to redesign or, in the case of trademark claims,
re-brand our Company, products or services, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations or financial condition.
The
three- and five-gallon polycarbonate plastic bottles that we use
to bottle our water contain bisphenol A (BPA), a
chemical that can possibly have adverse health effects on
consumers, particularly young children. Any significant change
in state, provincial or federal legislation, government
regulation or perception by our customers of polycarbonate
plastic in food and beverage products could adversely affect our
operations and financial results.
Our three- and five-gallon polycarbonate plastic bottles contain
BPA. The use of BPA in food packaging materials has been subject
to safety assessments by several international, federal and
state authorities. For instance, in January 2010, the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the FDA)
issued an updated report regarding its current perspective on
the safety of BPA in food packaging materials, asserting the
need for additional studies on BPA and issuing its interim
public health recommendations. BPA is an industrial chemical
used to make hard, clear plastic known as polycarbonate, which
is currently used in our three- and five-gallon water bottles.
BPA is regulated by the FDA as an indirect food additive. While
the FDA notes that studies employing standardized toxicity tests
support the safety of human exposure to BPA at the low levels
currently experienced by consumers, the FDAs report
additionally acknowledges the results of certain recent studies
which suggest some concern regarding potential developmental and
behavioral effects of BPA exposure, particularly on infants and
young children.
The FDA is continuing to evaluate these low dose toxicity
studies, as well as other recent peer-reviewed studies related
to BPA, and solicited public comment and inter-agency scientific
input in connection with updating its formal assessment of the
safety of BPA for use in food contact applications. In the
interim, the FDAs public health recommendations include
taking reasonable steps to reduce exposure of infants to BPA in
the food supply and working with industry to support and
evaluate manufacturing practices and alternative substances that
could reduce exposure in other populations. Further, the FDA
indicates that it plans to review its existing authority to
shift to a more robust regulatory framework for oversight of BPA.
22
Consistent with the findings of numerous international
regulatory bodies, we believe that the scientific evidence
suggests that polycarbonate plastic made with BPA is a safe
packing material for all consumers. Nonetheless, media reports
and the FDA report have prompted concern in our marketplace
among existing and potential customers. It is possible that
developments surrounding this issue could lead to adverse
effects on our business. Such developments could include:
|
|
|
|
|
increased publicity that changes public or regulatory perception
regarding packaging that uses BPA, so that significant numbers
of consumers stop purchasing products that are packaged in
polycarbonate plastic;
|
|
|
the emergence of new scientific evidence that suggests that the
low doses of BPA to which consumers may be exposed when using
polycarbonate plastic is unsafe;
|
|
|
interpretations of existing evidence by the FDA or other
regulatory agencies that lead to prohibitions on the use of
polycarbonate plastic as packaging for consumable products;
|
|
|
the listing of BPA by Californias Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment on the states Proposition 65
list, which would require us to label our products with
information about BPA content and could obligate us to evaluate
the levels of exposure to BPA associated with the use of our
products;
|
|
|
additional regulation of the use of BPA in food contact
applications by the Canadian government, which has recently
added BPA to the list of toxic substances in Schedule 1 of
the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999; and
|
|
|
the inability of sellers of consumable products to find an
adequate supply of alternative packaging if polycarbonate
plastic containing BPA becomes an undesirable or prohibited
packaging material.
|
In addition, federal, state and local governmental authorities
have and continue to introduce proposals intended to restrict or
ban the use of BPA in food and beverage packaging materials, and
indeed, a number of states have recently enacted BPA-related
legislation. At this juncture, we cannot predict with certainty
the impact that this enacted and proposed legislation may have
on our business.
If any of these events were to occur, our sales and operating
results could be materially adversely affected.
Our
products and services are heavily regulated in the United States
and Canada. If we are unable to continue to comply with
applicable regulations and standards in any jurisdiction, we
might not be able to sell our products in that jurisdiction or
they could be recalled, and our business could be seriously
harmed.
The production, distribution and sale of our products in the
United States are subject to regulation by the FDA under the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the FDCA), and
by other regulatory authorities under the Occupational Safety
and Health Act, the Lanham Act and various environmental
statutes. In Canada, these activities are subject to regulation
by Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (the
CFIA) under the Canadian Food and Drugs Act. We are
also subject to various other federal, state, provincial and
local statutes and regulations applicable to the production,
transportation, sale, safety, advertising, promotion, labeling
and ingredients of such products. For example, measures have
been enacted in various localities and states that require a
deposit to be charged for certain non-refillable beverage
containers. The precise requirements imposed by these measures
vary. Other deposit, recycling or product stewardship proposals
have been introduced in various jurisdictions. We anticipate
that similar legislation or regulations may be proposed in the
future at the local, state and federal levels.
The FDA regulates bottled water as a food under the FDCA. Our
bottled water must meet FDA and CFIA requirements of safety for
human consumption, identity, quality and labeling. Further, any
claims we make in marketing our products, such as claims related
to the beneficial health effects of drinking water, are subject
to FDAs advertising and promotion requirements and
restrictions. In addition, the FDA has established current good
manufacturing practices, regulations which govern the
facilities, methods, practices and controls used for the
processing, bottling and distribution of bottled drinking water.
We and our third-party bottling and distribution partners are
subject to these requirements. In addition, all public drinking
water must meet Environmental Protection Agency standards
established under the Safe Drinking Water Act for mineral and
chemical concentration and drinking water quality and treatment.
We also must comply with overlapping and, in some cases,
inconsistent state regulations in a variety of areas. These
state-level regulations, among other things, set standards for
approved water sources and the information that must be provided
and the basis on which any therapeutic claims for water
23
may be made. In Canada, we are subject to similar regulations
administered by Health Canada and the CFIA, as well as
provincial authorities. We must expend resources to continuously
monitor national, state and provincial legislative and
regulatory activities in order to identify and ensure compliance
with laws and regulations that apply to our bottled water
business in each state and province in which we operate.
Additionally, the manufacture, sale and use of resins used to
make water bottles are subject to regulation by the FDA. These
regulations relate to substances used in food packaging
materials, not with specific finished food packaging products.
Our beverage containers are deemed to be in compliance with FDA
regulations if the components used in the containers:
(i) are approved by the FDA as indirect food additives for
their intended uses and comply with the applicable FDA indirect
food additive regulations; or (ii) are generally recognized
as safe for their intended uses and are of suitable purity for
those intended uses. We may be subject to additional or changing
requirements under the recently enacted Federal Food Safety
Modernization Act of 2011, which requires among other things,
that food facilities conduct contamination hazard analyses,
implement risk-based preventive controls and develop track and
trace capabilities.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission, FDA, Health Canada, CFIA
or other applicable regulatory bodies may require the recall,
repair or replacement of our products if those products are
found not to be in compliance with applicable standards or
regulations. The failure of our third party manufacturers or
bottlers to produce merchandise that adheres to our quality
control standards could damage our reputation and lead to
customer litigation against us. If our manufacturers or
distributors are unable or unwilling to recall products failing
to meet our quality standards, we may be required to remove
merchandise or recall those products at a substantial cost to
us. We may be unable to recover costs related to product recalls.
We believe that our self-imposed standards meet or exceed those
set by federal, state, provincial and local regulations. In
addition, we voluntarily comply with the Federal Trade
Commissions Green Guides concerning the making
of environmental claims in marketing materials. Nevertheless,
our failure or the failure of our suppliers, bottlers,
distributors or third-party services providers to comply with
federal, state, provincial or local laws, rules or regulations
could subject us to potential governmental enforcement action
for violation of such regulations, which could result in warning
letters, fines, product recalls or seizures, civil or criminal
penalties
and/or
temporary or permanent injunctions, each of which could
materially harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, our failure, or even our perceived
failure, to comply with applicable laws, rules or regulations
could cause retailers and others to determine not to do business
with us or reduce the amount of business they do with us.
Legislative
and executive action in state and local governments enacting
local taxes on bottled water to include multi-gallon bottled
water could adversely affect our business and financial
results.
Regulations have been enacted or proposed in some localities
where we operate to enact local taxes on bottled water. These
actions are purportedly designed to discourage the use of
bottled water due in large part to concerns about the
environmental effects of producing and discarding large numbers
of plastic bottles. While we have not to date directly
experienced any adverse effects from these concerns, and we
believe that our products are sufficiently different from those
affected by recent enactments, there is no assurance that our
products will not be subject to future legislative and executive
action by state and local governments, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
or financial condition.
Litigation
or legal proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities,
including product liability claims, and damage our
reputation.
We are from time to time party to various litigation claims and
legal proceedings. We evaluate these claims and proceedings to
assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and estimate, if
possible, the amount of potential losses. If our products are
not properly manufactured or designed, personal injuries or
property damage could result, which could subject us to claims
for damages. The costs associated with defending product
liability and other claims, and the payment of damages, could be
substantial. Our reputation could also be adversely affected by
such claims, whether or not successful.
We may establish a reserve as appropriate based upon assessments
and estimates in accordance with our accounting policies. We
base our assessments, estimates and disclosures on the
information available to us at the
24
time and rely on legal and management judgment. Actual outcomes
or losses may differ materially from assessments and estimates.
Actual settlements, judgments or resolutions of these claims or
proceedings may negatively affect our business and financial
performance. A successful claim against us that is not covered
by insurance or is in excess of our available insurance limits
could require us to make significant payments of damages and
could materially adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition.
Risks
Relating to Our Common Stock
The value
of our common stock could be volatile, and the market price of
our common stock after this offering may drop below the price
you pay.
The overall market and the price of our common stock may
fluctuate greatly. Shares of our common stock were sold in our
November 2010 initial public offering at a price of $12.00 per
share, and, as of June 7, 2011, our common stock has
subsequently traded as high as $16.45 and as low as $10.17. An
active, liquid and orderly market for our common stock may not
develop or be sustained, which could depress the trading price
of our common stock. The trading price of our common stock may
be significantly affected by various factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
quarterly fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
changes in investors and analysts perception of the
business risks and conditions of our business;
|
|
|
our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance
expectations of financial analysts or investors;
|
|
|
unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity
research analysts;
|
|
|
termination of
lock-up
agreements or other restrictions on the ability of our existing
stockholders to sell their shares; and
|
|
|
general economic or political conditions.
|
Future
sales of our common stock, or the perception in the public
markets that these sales may occur, may depress our stock
price.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could
cause the market price of our common stock to decline. These
sales could also make it more difficult for us to sell equity or
equity-related securities in the future at times or prices that
we deem appropriate.
As of May 26, 2011, we had 19,932,181 outstanding shares of
common stock. The 9,583,333 shares sold in our initial
public offering are generally tradable without restriction.
Certain of the remaining 10,348,848 shares are subject to
lock-up
agreements and, in some cases, subject to volume and other
restrictions of Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the
Securities Act.
In connection with this offering, holders of
6,902,607 shares of our common stock and holders of
740,543 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of outstanding equity awards, including in each case all of our
officers and directors and the selling stockholders, have
entered into
lock-up
agreements that are expected to expire 90 days from the
date of this offering (subject to extension in certain
circumstances). Culligan Internationals
lock-up
agreement is subject to early termination on July 15, 2011
if a registration statement for an underwritten public offering
providing for the sale by Culligan International of at least
2,200,000 shares of our common stock (and the sale of the
first 694,717 shares in excess of 6,000,000 total shares
sold) (a Qualifying Offering) has not been declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to
July 15, 2011. The representative of the underwriters for
this offering may, in its sole discretion and at any time
without notice, release all or any portion of the securities
subject to
lock-up
agreements.
In addition, Culligan International and Omnifrio Beverage
Company, LLC both have rights with respect to the registration
of their shares under the Securities Act. When we register their
shares of common stock, these stockholders could sell those
shares in the public market following the expiration of
lock-up
agreements without being subject to the volume and other
restrictions of Rule 144 and Rule 701. In connection
with this offering, Culligan International entered into an
amendment to its registration rights agreement with the Company
that provides that a resale registration statement registering
Culligan Internationals shares is required to be effective
no later than (a) July 15, 2011 or (b) if the
Company files a registration statement in connection with a
Qualifying
25
Offering which is declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission before July 15, 2011, the date which is
75 days after the effective date of that registration
statement.
In addition, we intend to register 1,108,578 shares of
common stock that are issuable in connection with our equity
compensation plans.
In
addition to the shares of common stock we are offering hereby,
we may in the future issue additional shares of common stock to
raise capital or complete acquisitions, which could result in
additional dilution to our stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up
to 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per
share. As of May 26, 2011, we had 19,932,181 shares of
common stock issued and outstanding. We will have
23,353,550 shares of common stock outstanding after this
offering (assuming no exercise by the underwriters of their
option to purchase additional shares of common stock to cover
over-allotments, if any). If (i) our cash flows are less
than we anticipate or we have less than expected availability
under our senior revolving credit facility, (ii) we choose
to accelerate our rate of organic growth beyond its currently
anticipated level or (iii) we pursue additional strategic
acquisitions, in addition to the shares of common stock we are
offering hereby, we may in the future issue a substantial number
of additional shares of our common stock to raise capital or to
fund such acquisitions. The issuance of such additional shares
of our common stock may result in significant dilution to our
existing stockholders and adversely affect the prevailing market
price for our common stock.
Concentration
of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors
and their affiliates may prevent new investors from influencing
significant corporate decisions.
As of May 26, 2011, our executive officers, directors and
their affiliates beneficially own, in the aggregate,
approximately 17.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock.
In particular, Billy D. Prim, our Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President, beneficially owns approximately 12.4% of
our outstanding shares of common stock as of May 26, 2011.
In addition, Culligan International owns approximately 14.5% of
our outstanding shares of common stock as of May 26, 2011.
As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise a
significant level of control over all matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the election of directors,
amendment of our certificate of incorporation and approval of
significant corporate transactions. This control could have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our
Company or changes in management and will make the approval of
certain transactions difficult or impossible without the support
of these stockholders.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business,
our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the
research and reports that securities or industry analysts
publish about us or our business. We currently have research
coverage by a limited number securities and industry analysts.
If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our
stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our
business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more
of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish
reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease,
which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might
discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that you might
consider favorable.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the
acquisition of our Company more difficult without the approval
of our Board of Directors. These provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the
terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be
issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super
voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or
preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common
stock;
|
|
|
eliminate the ability of our stockholders to act by written
consent in most circumstances;
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for
elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters
that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings;
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
provide that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to
make, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws; and
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors the members of which
will serve staggered three-year terms.
|
As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of
Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which prevents some stockholders holding more
than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in
certain business combinations without approval of the holders of
substantially all of our outstanding common stock.
These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under
Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction
involving a change in control of our Company, including actions
that our stockholders may deem advantageous, or negatively
affect the trading price of our common stock. These provisions
could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult
for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your
choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you
desire.
If we do
not timely satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the trading price of our common
stock could be adversely affected.
As a company with publicly-traded securities, we are subject to
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This law
requires us to document and test the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting in accordance with an
established internal control framework and to report on our
conclusion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting. The cost to comply with this law will
affect our net income adversely. Any delays or difficulty in
satisfying the requirements of Section 404 could, among
other things, cause investors to lose confidence in, or
otherwise be unable to rely on, the accuracy of our reported
financial information, which could adversely affect the trading
price of our common stock. In addition, failure to comply with
Section 404 could result in the Nasdaq Stock Market
imposing sanctions on us, which could include the delisting of
our common stock.
Risks
Relating to Our Indebtedness
Restrictive
covenants in our senior revolving credit facility restrict or
prohibit our ability to engage in or enter into a variety of
transactions, which could adversely restrict our financial and
operating flexibility and subject us to other risks.
Our senior revolving credit facility contains various
restrictive covenants that limit our and our subsidiaries
ability to take certain actions. In particular, these agreements
limit our and our subsidiaries ability to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
make restricted payments (including paying dividends on,
redeeming or repurchasing capital stock);
|
|
|
make certain investments or acquisitions;
|
|
|
create liens on our assets to secure debt;
|
|
|
engage in certain types of transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
engage in
sale-and-leaseback
or similar transactions; and
|
|
|
transfer or sell assets, merge, liquidate or
wind-up.
|
Any or all of these covenants could have a material adverse
effect on our business by limiting our ability to take advantage
of financing, merger and acquisition or other corporate
opportunities and to fund our operations. Any future debt could
also contain financial and other covenants more restrictive than
those to be imposed under our senior revolving credit facility.
A breach of a covenant or other provision in any debt instrument
governing our current or future indebtedness could result in a
default under that instrument and, due to customary
cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions, could result in
a default under any other debt instrument that we may have. If
the lenders under our indebtedness were to so accelerate the
payment of the indebtedness, we cannot assure you that our
assets or cash flow would be
27
sufficient to repay in full our outstanding indebtedness, in
which event we likely would seek reorganization or protection
under bankruptcy or other, similar laws.
We may be
unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt
obligations. In addition, our inability to generate sufficient
cash flows to support operations and other activities without
debt financing could prevent future growth and
success.
Our ability to generate cash, make scheduled payments or
refinance our obligations depends on our successful financial
and operating performance. Our financial and operating
performance, cash flow and capital resources depend upon
prevailing economic conditions and various financial, business
and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our
cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our
debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay
capital expenditures, sell material assets or operations, obtain
additional capital or restructure our debt, any or all of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, we cannot
assure you that we would be able to take any of these actions on
terms acceptable to us, or at all, that these actions would
enable us to continue to satisfy our capital requirements or
that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our
various debt agreements.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows to support
capital expansion, business acquisition plans and general
operating activities, and are unable obtain the necessary
funding for these items through debt financing, our business
could be negatively affected and we may be unable to expand into
existing and new markets. Our ability to generate cash flows is
dependent in part upon obtaining necessary financing at
favorable interest rates. Interest rate fluctuations and other
capital market conditions may prevent us from doing so.
Global
capital and credit market issues could negatively affect our
liquidity, increase our costs of borrowing and disrupt the
operations of our suppliers, bottlers, distributors and
customers.
The global capital and credit markets have experienced increased
volatility and disruption in recent years, making it more
difficult for companies to access those markets. There can be no
assurance that continued or increased volatility and disruption
in the capital and credit markets will not impair our liquidity
or increase our costs of borrowing. Our business could also be
negatively impacted if our suppliers, bottlers, distributors or
retail customers experience disruptions resulting from tighter
capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy.
28
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our managements beliefs and assumptions and on
information currently available to our management. The
forward-looking statements are contained principally in the
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and
Business sections of this prospectus.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning our
possible future results of operations, business strategies,
competitive position, potential growth opportunities, potential
market opportunities and the effects of competition.
Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not
historical facts and can be identified by terms such as
anticipates, believes,
could, seeks, estimates,
expects, intends, may,
plans, potential, predicts,
projects, should, will,
would or similar expressions and the negatives of
those terms.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed
or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss these
risks in greater detail in the Risk Factors section
and elsewhere in this prospectus. Given these uncertainties, you
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our
managements beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of
this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the
documents that we have filed as exhibits to the registration
statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and
with the understanding that our actual future results may be
materially different from what we expect.
Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the
reasons actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new
information becomes available in the future.
29
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from our sale of shares of
common stock in this offering will be approximately
$42.2 million (or approximately $46.4 million if the
underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase
additional shares to cover over-allotments, if any). This
estimate is based on an assumed public offering price of $13.15
per share, which was the last reported sale price of our common
stock on June 7, 2011, less estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders except as described below. We intend to use
the net proceeds from this offering for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
$29.0 million to repay borrowings and estimated accrued
interest under our current senior revolving credit
facility; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
$13.2 million for working capital and general corporate
purposes, including establishing new store locations for our
water bottle exchange and refill vending services.
|
As of June 7, 2011, we had $29.0 million of
outstanding borrowings, including accrued interest, under our
senior revolving credit facility that is scheduled to expire in
November 2013. Interest on outstanding borrowings under the
senior revolving credit facility is payable at our option at
either a floating base rate plus an interest rate spread or a
floating LIBOR rate plus an interest rate spread. At
June 7, 2011, we had $29.0 million in base rate
borrowings that bore interest at 5.25%. Borrowings under our
current senior revolving credit facility during the past
12 months were made (a) to fund a portion of the
purchase price for the Refill Business and the other
transactions that occurred in connection with the closing of our
initial public offering, (b) to fund the cash portion of
the consideration paid for the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business and the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business and
(c) for working capital and general corporate expenses,
including establishing new store locations for our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services.
We issued 307,217 shares of our common stock to Culligan
International on March 8, 2011 as payment of a portion of
the purchase price for the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business.
Any profits realized by Culligan International upon the sale of
up to 307,217 shares of common stock prior to
September 7, 2011 are recoverable by the Company under
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). Accordingly, Culligan
International agreed that it will pay us the amount of any
profit realized as a result of the sale of 307,217 of the shares
of common stock it sells in this offering, less direct
transaction expenses. Culligan International will not realize
any profit on the sale of shares of common stock in this
offering unless the offering price is greater than approximately
$13.34 per share. Based upon an assumed offering price of $13.15
per share (which was the last reported sale price of our common
stock on June 7, 2011), Culligan International would not
realize any profits and would not be required to disgorge any
profits to us. Based upon a hypothetical offering price of
$14.00 per share, we estimate that Culligan International would
disgorge approximately $192,000 to us. This hypothetical amount
to be disgorged is calculated by reference to Culligan
Internationals gross proceeds from the sale of such
307,217 shares in this offering at such hypothetical $14.00
per share price (approximately $4,301,000) less its direct
transaction expenses (approximately $290,000 consisting of the
underwriting discount and legal fees and expenses directly
related to the offering) less its purchase price for such shares
(approximately $3,819,000). We intend to use any such amounts
paid to us for working capital and general corporate purposes as
described above.
30
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
We completed the initial public offering of our common stock on
November 10, 2010. The principal United States market on
which the Companys common stock is listed and traded is
the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol PRMW.
The table below presents the high and low sales prices per share
of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.74
|
|
|
$
|
10.17
|
|
Second Quarter (through June 7, 2011)
|
|
$
|
16.45
|
|
|
$
|
11.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Fourth Quarter (Beginning November 5, 2010)
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
11.53
|
|
On June 7, 2011, the last reported sale price of our common
stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $13.15.
As of June 7, 2011, we had approximately
85 shareholders of record.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never paid or declared cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any
future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our
business. We do not expect to pay any dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay
dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors
and will depend upon various factors, including our results of
operations, financial condition, capital requirements, debt
levels, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the
payment of dividends, investment opportunities and other factors
that our Board of Directors deems relevant.
31
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis to reflect (i) the sale of shares in
this offering at an assumed offering price of $13.15 per share,
which was the last reported sale price of our common stock on
June 7, 2011, after deducting estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us,
and (ii) the application of a portion of the net proceeds
from such sale of common stock to repay borrowings under our
current senior revolving credit facility and to pay fees and
expenses in connection with the foregoing.
|
You should read this table in conjunction with Use of
Proceeds, Selected Financial Data, and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
|
$
|
22,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, capital leases and notes
payable
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable, net of current
portion
|
|
|
20,613
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 70,000 shares
authorized and 19,362 shares issued and outstanding,
actual; and 70,000 shares authorized and 22,784 shares
issued and outstanding, pro forma
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 65,000 shares
authorized and no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
223,532
|
|
|
|
265,770
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(115,836
|
)
|
|
|
(115,836
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
115,218
|
|
|
|
157,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
135,842
|
|
|
$
|
157,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shares outstanding data in the preceding table as of
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
excludes 68,823 shares of unvested restricted common stock;
|
|
|
excludes 466,211 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options;
|
|
|
excludes 81,000 shares of common stock issuable in connection
with outstanding restricted stock units that are to be settled
in shares of common stock;
|
|
|
excludes 846,393 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants;
|
|
|
excludes an additional 468,559 shares of common stock
issuable under our 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan that
were not subject to outstanding awards;
|
|
|
excludes an aggregate of 23,958 shares of common stock
issuable under our 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option to purchase up to 900,000 additional shares of our common
stock from us and a selling stockholder.
|
32
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth, for the periods and dates
indicated, our selected historical consolidated financial and
other data. We prepared the selected historical consolidated
financial data using our consolidated financial statements for
each of the periods presented. The selected historical
consolidated financial data for each year in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2010, was derived from our
audited historical consolidated financial statements appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, and the selected historical
consolidated financial data for each year in the two-year period
ended December 31, 2007, was derived from our audited
historical consolidated financial statements not appearing in
this prospectus. The selected historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2011 was derived from our unaudited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same
basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and, in
the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for those periods. The results for
any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for a full year. The historical results
included here and elsewhere in this prospectus are not
necessarily indicative of future performance or results of
operations.
The selected historical consolidated financial data presented
below represent portions of our financial statements and are not
complete. You should read this information in conjunction with
Use of Proceeds, Capitalization,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Unaudited Pro
Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
6,589
|
|
|
$
|
13,453
|
|
|
$
|
34,647
|
|
|
$
|
46,981
|
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,139
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
30,776
|
|
|
|
38,771
|
|
|
|
34,213
|
|
|
|
6,922
|
|
|
|
12,113
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
|
|
10,353
|
|
|
|
13,791
|
|
|
|
9,922
|
|
|
|
12,621
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
3,366
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
17,313
|
|
|
|
25,688
|
|
|
|
48,185
|
|
|
|
52,898
|
|
|
|
54,084
|
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
18,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(10,724
|
)
|
|
|
(12,235
|
)
|
|
|
(13,538
|
)
|
|
|
(5,917
|
)
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
Interest and other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(10,608
|
)
|
|
|
(12,170
|
)
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(1,924
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(10,608
|
)
|
|
|
(12,170
|
)
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,904
|
)
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(10,608
|
)
|
|
|
(14,074
|
)
|
|
|
(19,346
|
)
|
|
|
(11,824
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant
modification charges
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
(2,147
|
)
|
|
|
(19,875
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042
|
)
|
|
|
(9,831
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(11,459
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,724
|
)
|
|
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(7.94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9.88
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(3.96
|
)
|
|
|
(2.51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(7.94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
19,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
7,638
|
|
|
$
|
5,776
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
20,904
|
|
|
|
21,909
|
|
|
|
30,570
|
|
|
|
22,368
|
|
|
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
152,128
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7,009
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
17,945
|
|
|
|
20,613
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except location amounts)
|
|
|
Other information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primo water operations locations at period end
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
Primo water operations units (5 gallon equivalents) sold
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
3,694
|
|
|
|
8,137
|
|
|
|
9,050
|
|
Primo water dispenser units sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
34
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the Companys financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are a rapidly growing provider of multi-gallon purified
bottled water, self-serve filtered drinking water, and water
dispensers sold through major retailers in the United States and
Canada. Our business is designed to generate recurring demand
for Primo purified bottled water through the sale of our
innovative water dispensers. Once our bottled water is consumed
using a water dispenser, empty bottles are either exchanged at
our recycling center displays, which provide a recycling ticket
that offers a discount toward the purchase of a new bottle of
Primo purified water (exchange services) or they can be refilled
at a self-serve filtered drinking water vending location (refill
services). We provide major retailers throughout the United
States and Canada with single-vendor solutions for water bottle
exchange services and refill services. Our solutions are easy
for retailers to implement, require minimal customer management
supervision and store-based labor and provide centralized
billing and detailed performance reports. As of March 31,
2011, our Water services were offered in each of the contiguous
United States and Canada at approximately 14,600 retail
locations. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, we generated net sales of
$34.6 million, $47.0 million and $44.6 million,
respectively.
On November 10, 2010, we completed our initial public
offering (IPO) of 8.3 million shares of our
common stock at a price of $12.00 per share. In addition on
November 18, 2010, we issued an additional 1.3 million
shares upon the exercise of the over-allotment option by the
underwriters of our IPO. The net proceeds of the IPO after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions were
approximately $106.9 million.
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of
Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan Canada (the
Refill Business or Refill Acquisition)
pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2010
for a purchase price of approximately $109.1 million. The
purchase price was paid by $74.5 million in proceeds from
the IPO and the issuance of approximately 2.6 million
shares of our common stock with a value of approximately
$34.6 million based upon the $13.38 average price of our
common stock on November 10, 2010.
In addition to the acquisition of the Refill Business, we used
the proceeds of our IPO along with $15.0 million in
borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility to:
(i) repay the outstanding borrowings under our prior senior
loan agreement of approximately $7.9 million;
(ii) repay subordinated debt and accrued interest of
approximately $18.7 million; (iii) redeem 50% of the
outstanding Series B preferred stock along with all unpaid
and accrued dividends totaling approximately $15.8 million;
and (iv) to pay fees and expenses of approximately
$5.0 million in connection with all of the foregoing items.
In this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, when we refer to
same-store unit growth for our Water segment, we are
comparing retail locations at which our exchange services have
been available for at least 12 months at the beginning of
the relevant period.
Business
Segments
At March 31, 2011, we had two operating segments and two
reportable segments: Primo Water (Water) and Primo
Products (Products). The Water segment includes our
historical business of bottled water exchange services
(Exchange), the Refill Business (Refill)
acquired in November 2010, the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business (Canada Exchange) acquired in March 2011
and the operations of a unit that previously was an operating
segment, but did not meet quantitative threshold for reporting
purposes. Historically, we have disclosed Exchange, Refill and
Products as reportable segments. However in 2011, we have begun
to integrate the Exchange and Refill operations to take
advantage of synergies and to eliminate duplicate operations and
costs. In integrating the businesses we have changed our
internal management and reporting structure such that Exchange
and Refill no longer meet the requirements of operating segments
on a stand-alone basis. The recently acquired Canada Exchange
business will be reported within the Water segment. All previous
periods have been retrospectively revised to conform to this
presentation.
35
Our Water segment sales consist of the sale of multi-gallon
purified bottled water (exchange services) and our self-serve
filtered drinking water vending service (refill services)
through retailers in each of the contiguous United States and
Canada. Our Water services are offered through point of purchase
display racks or self-serve filtered water vending displays and
recycling centers that are prominently located at major
retailers in space that is often underutilized.
Our Products segment sells water dispensers that are designed to
dispense Primo and other dispenser-compatible bottled water. Our
Products sales are primarily generated through major
U.S. retailers. Our water dispensers are sold primarily
through a direct-import model, where we recognize revenues for
the sale of the water dispensers when title is transferred to
our retailer customers. We support retail sell-through with
limited domestic inventory. We design, market and arrange for
certification and inspection of our products.
We evaluate the financial results of these segments focusing
primarily on segment net sales and segment income (loss) from
operations before depreciation and amortization (segment
income (loss) from operations). We utilize segment net
sales and segment income (loss) from operations because we
believe they provide useful information for effectively
allocating our resources between business segments, evaluating
the health of our business segments based on metrics that
management can actively influence and gauging our investments
and our ability to service, incur or pay down debt.
Cost of sales for Water consists of costs for bottling and
related packaging materials and distribution costs for our
bottled water for our exchange services and servicing and
material costs for our refill services. Cost of sales for
Products consists of contract manufacturing, freight, duties and
warehousing costs of our water dispensers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for all segments
consist primarily of personnel costs for sales, marketing,
operations support and customer service, as well as other
supporting costs for operating each segment.
Expenses not specifically related to operating segments are
shown separately as Corporate. Corporate expenses are comprised
mainly of compensation and other related expenses for corporate
support, information systems, and human resources and
administration. Corporate expenses also include certain
professional fees and expenses and compensation of our Board of
Directors.
In December 2009, we completed the divestiture of our former
subsidiary, Prima Bottled Water, Inc. (Prima), by
distributing the stock in Prima to our existing stockholders on
a pro rata basis based upon each such stockholders
proportionate ownership of our common stock, Series A
preferred stock and Series C preferred stock on an
as-converted basis. The assets, liabilities and results of
operations of Prima are accounted for as discontinued
operations. For 2008 and 2009, we recognized losses from
discontinued operations of $5.7 million and
$3.7 million, respectively.
Recent
Transactions
Canada
Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
of Culligan Canadas assets related to its bulk water
exchange business (the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business). The consideration paid for the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business was approximately $5.4 million,
which consisted of a cash payment of approximately
$1.6 million and the issuance of 307,217 shares of our
common stock, and the assumption of certain specified
liabilities. The Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business provides
refill and delivery of water in 18-liter containers to
commercial retailers in Canada for resale to consumers. The
acquisition of the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business expands
our existing exchange service offering and provides us with an
immediate network of regional operators and major retailers in
Canada (including Walmart, Sobeys, The Home Depot and Zellers)
with approximately 780 retail locations. The Canada Bulk Water
Exchange Business has been accounted for as a business
combination in accordance with the acquisition method.
Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business
On April 11, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
intellectual property and other assets (the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business) from Omnifrio Beverage
Company, LLC (Omnifrio) for total consideration of
36
up to approximately $13.2 million, consisting of:
(i) a cash payment at closing of $2.0 million;
(ii) the issuance at closing of 501,080 shares of the
Companys common stock; (iii) a cash payment of
$2.0 million on the
15-month
anniversary of the closing date (subject to the Companys
setoff rights in the asset purchase agreement); (iv) up to
$3.0 million in cash milestone payments; and (v) the
assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business. The Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business has been accounted for as a
business combination in accordance with the acquisition method.
The Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business primarily consists
of technology related to single-serve cold carbonated beverage
appliances and consumable flavor cups, or S-cups,
and
CO2
cylinders used with the appliances to make a variety of cold
beverages. The acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage
Business serves as an entry point into the U.S. market for
carbonated beverages and the rapidly growing self-carbonating
appliance and single-serve beverage segments.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
34,647
|
|
|
$
|
46,981
|
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,139
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
30,776
|
|
|
|
38,771
|
|
|
|
34,213
|
|
|
|
6,922
|
|
|
|
12,113
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,791
|
|
|
|
9,922
|
|
|
|
12,621
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
48,185
|
|
|
|
52,898
|
|
|
|
54,084
|
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
18,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(13,538
|
)
|
|
|
(5,917
|
)
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(1,924
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(19,346
|
)
|
|
|
(11,824
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant
modification charges
|
|
|
(19,875
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042
|
)
|
|
|
(9,831
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(39,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
The following table sets forth our results of operations
expressed as a percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Consolidated statements of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
88.8
|
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
|
|
|
78.4
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
139.1
|
|
|
|
112.6
|
|
|
|
121.2
|
|
|
|
120.6
|
|
|
|
109.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(39.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
(21.2
|
)
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
(9.6
|
)
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(39.3
|
)
|
|
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(55.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(25.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(28.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth our segment net sales and segment
income (loss) from operations presented on a segment basis and
reconciled to our consolidated loss from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Segment net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
21,111
|
|
|
$
|
24,249
|
|
|
$
|
29,875
|
|
|
$
|
5,920
|
|
|
$
|
13,146
|
|
Products
|
|
|
13,758
|
|
|
|
22,824
|
|
|
|
14,741
|
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
Inter-company elimination
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
34,647
|
|
|
$
|
46,981
|
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,767
|
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
3,194
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
Intercompany elimination
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(7,077
|
)
|
|
|
(4,789
|
)
|
|
|
(8,922
|
)
|
|
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(3,618
|
)
|
|
|
(4,205
|
)
|
|
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
|
(995
|
)
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(13,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 increased $8.3 million or 94.1%
to $17.1 million from $8.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in net sales
resulted from a 122.1% increase in Water sales and a 37.3%
increase in Products sales.
Water. Water net sales increased
$7.2 million or 122.1% to $13.1 million, representing
76.7% of our total net sales for the three months ending
March 31, 2011. The increase in Water net sales is
partially due to an 11.7% increase in exchange services, driven
by a 12.3% increase in five-gallon equivalent units sold to
38
1.2 million units (excluding the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business) and a 6.0% same-store unit growth compared to the
first quarter of 2010. In addition, net sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, included $6.4 million and
$0.2 million in sales attributable to the Refill Business
and the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business, respectively.
Products. Products net sales increased
$1.1 million, or 37.3% to $4.0 million, representing
23.3% of our total net sales for the three months ended
March 31, 2011. The increase is due primarily to the
addition of several new water dispenser models, which began
shipping in the fourth quarter of 2010. We believe that sales at
retail to end consumers increased approximately 8% with
approximately the same number of selling locations during the
three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the prior
year.
Gross Margin. Our overall gross margin,
defined as net sales less cost of sales, increased as a
percentage of net sales to 29.3% for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, from 21.6% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, respectively. The improvement in gross
profit margin is primarily the result of an increased mix of
higher margin Water segment sales.
Water. Gross margin as a percentage of net
sales in our Water segment increased to 36.6% for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, from 28.6% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. Gross margin during the first
quarter of 2011 benefited from the impact of the Refill Business
and higher margin refill services.
Products. Gross margin as a percentage of net
sales in our Products segment decreased to 5.3% for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 from 7.4% for the three months
ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in gross margin is
primarily the result of an increased mix of sales of products
that have lower gross margins as well as a greater mix of
domestic sales versus import sales, which are sold at lower
gross margins. We continue to focus on selling our water
dispensers at minimal operating profit in order to increase home
penetration, which we believe will lead to increased recurring
revenue, higher margin Water sales.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $1.3 million or 48.5% to
$4.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011. However, as a percentage of net sales, selling, general
and administrative expenses decreased to 23.7% for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, from 31.0% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is the result of
increased headcount necessary to operate as a public company and
the costs of operating duplicate back-office operations.
Water. Selling, general and administrative
expenses of our Water segment increased 80.1% to
$1.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011. The increase is primarily a result of costs of operating
duplicate back-office operations following the acquisitions.
However, selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of Water segment net sales decreased to 12.3% for the
three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to 15.2% for
the three months ended March 31, 2010. We expect that this
trend will continue as we reduce duplicate costs related to the
Refill Business acquisition and leverage costs with increased
sales growth.
Products. Selling, general and administrative
expenses of our Products segment increased 132.2% to
$0.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of Products segment net sales increased to 16.1% for
the three months ended March 31, 2011, from 9.5% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is
primarily a result of expenses related to product development,
marketing samples and promotional materials related to our new
dispenser line.
Corporate. Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses, increased $0.2 million or 15.4% to
$1.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011. The increase is primarily from an increase in salaries and
related payroll costs from additional employees as well as an
increase in professional and related expenses necessary to
operate as a public company. However, selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated net
sales decreased to 10.5% for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, from 17.6% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. While we continue to expect to incur
additional costs to operate as a public company related to
compliance, reporting and insurance, we expect selling, general
and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated net
sales to continue to decrease as we leverage these expenses with
increased sales growth.
39
Acquisition Related Costs. Acquisition related
costs totaled $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2011 and
are associated with the acquisitions of the Refill Business, the
Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business and the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business. These acquisition related costs
consist primarily of professional and related expenses. We
expect to continue to incur acquisition related costs related to
acquisitions ranging from $1.2 to $1.8 million over the
remainder of 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization increased 91.1% to $1.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase is due to
depreciation on property and equipment related to our recent
business acquisitions as well as amortization related to
identifiable intangible assets.
Interest Expense and Other Income,
Net. Interest expense decreased to
$0.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011, from $0.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. The decrease is a result of the
recapitalization and proceeds from the IPO in November 2010,
which allowed the Company to refinance with traditional bank
debt at significantly lower interest rates than the subordinated
debt.
Preferred Dividends. Preferred dividends
decreased and were eliminated upon the completion of our IPO in
which 50% of the Series B preferred stock was redeemed
along with all unpaid and accrued dividends. The remaining 50%
of the Series B preferred stock was converted into shares
of common stock. We do not expect to incur charges for dividends
in the future.
Year
Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2009
Net Sales. Net sales for 2010 decreased
$2.4 million or 5.1% to $44.6 million from
$47.0 million for 2009. The decrease in sales for 2010
resulted primarily from a 35.4% decrease in Products sales
offset by a 23.2% increase in Water net sales, which included
the Refill Business for the period from November 10, 2010
to December 31, 2010.
Water. Water net sales increased $5.6 million
or 23.2% to $29.9 million, representing 67.0% of our total
net sales for 2010. The increase for 2010 compared to the same
period in 2009 was the result of a $2.3 million increase in
exchange services net sales as well as the addition of the
Refill Business, which accounted for $3.3 million of the
increase. The increase in exchange services net sales was the
result of an approximately 11% increase in five-gallon
equivalent units sold to approximately 4.1 million. The
increase in units sold was driven by an approximately 14%
increase in exchange services locations to approximately 8,000
at December 31, 2010 as well as an increase in same store
units of approximately 5% for 2010. The increase was offset
slightly by a decrease in the average price per unit of
approximately 1.1% for 2010 compared to 2009. The decrease in
average price per unit is the result of a shift in mix of
transactions to 73.6% exchange transactions and 26.4%
non-exchange transactions for 2010 compared to 70.9% exchange
transactions and 29.1% non-exchange transactions for 2009. The
shift in the mix of transactions is due to the increase in the
overall number of repeat consumers utilizing our exchange
service. We recognize approximately twice as much revenue on
non-exchange transactions as we do on exchange transactions as a
result of the discount provided to consumers for the return of
an empty multi-gallon bottle in exchange for the purchase of a
new multi-gallon bottle of purified water. Adding new locations
at which our Water services is offered is important to our
strategy of penetrating more homes with our water dispensers as
expanded locations and increased water bottle availability
enhance the convenience of our service to consumers. The
acquisition of the Refill Business on November 10, 2010
provided us with an established platform to expand into the
self-serve filtered drinking water refill business. The refill
services are highly complementary to our exchange services from
both a product and operational perspective. For the period from
the acquisition date through December 31, 2010, the refill
service generated $3.3 million in net sales from
approximately 4,600 locations.
Products. Products net sales decreased
$8.1 million or 35.4% to $14.7 million, representing
33.0% of our total net sales for 2010. The decrease is a result
of a decrease in the number of dispenser units sold by
approximately 30.9% for 2010. We believe the decrease in sales
and units is primarily the result of retailers continuing to
manage their inventory levels in anticipation of a new product
line, which began shipping in the fourth quarter of 2010. Sales
in the fourth quarter 2010 increased approximately 38% compared
to the fourth quarter of 2009. We believe sales at retail to end
consumers increased 14% in 2010 compared to 2009. We anticipate
this overall trend of decreases in Product sales to reverse and
expect to begin increasing sales going forward as more customers
begin to replenish their inventories with the new product line.
40
Gross Margin. Our overall gross margin, defined as
net sales less cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales
increased to 23.3% for 2010 from 17.5% for 2009.
Water. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales in
Water increased to 32.2% for 2010 from 28.4% for 2009. This
increase is partially due to exchange services continuing to see
benefits from supply chain improvements that increased the gross
margin to 27.3% for 2010 from 26.6% for 2009. Gross margins
continued to see improvements as we realized a full years
worth of benefits from these improvements. The acquisition of
the Refill Business provided gross margin of 54.0% during the
period from November 10, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Gross margins could be impacted in 2011 if fuel prices continue
to increase and effect freight and distribution costs negatively.
Products. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales
in our Products segment decreased to 5.3% for 2010 from 5.6% for
2009. This decrease is due primarily to the mix of dispensers
sold during 2010 as compared to 2009. Our strategy is to sell
our water dispensers at minimal operating profit in order to
increase home penetration, which we believe will lead to
increased recurring revenue, higher margin Water operations
sales.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $2.7 million or 27.2% to $12.6 million for
2010. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and
administrative expenses increased to 28.3% for 2010 from 21.1%
for 2009.
Water. Selling, general and administrative expenses
of Water increased $1.3 million or 34.8% to
$4.8 million for 2010. As a percentage of net sales,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 16.2%
for 2010 from 14.8% for 2009. The increase is primarily related
to an increase in exchange services resulting from an increase
in marketing and sales efforts related to the addition of new
locations in 2010. In addition, the Refill Business added
$0.4 million in additional selling, general and
administrative expenses during 2010. As we integrate the
operations of the Refill Business we anticipate selling, general
and administrative expenses to decrease as a percentage of
revenues in the future.
Products. Selling, general and administrative
expenses of our Products segment decreased $0.2 million or
12.6% to $1.4 million for 2010. This decrease is primarily
the result of reduced advertising and marketing expenses in 2010
as compared to 2009. Selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of Products segment net sales increased
to 9.2% for 2010 from 6.8% for 2009. The increase as a
percentage of Products segment net sales is a result of the
35.4% decrease in Product net sales.
Corporate. Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses, increased $1.6 million or 34.3% to
$6.4 million for 2010. Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated net
sales increased to 14.4% for 2010 from 10.2% for 2009. The
increase resulted primarily from an increase in salaries and
related payroll costs associated with the additional employees
hired in preparation for our IPO. Also, non-cash stock
compensation increased $0.4 million primarily as a result
of the immediate vesting of all unvested stock options upon the
completion of the IPO. We expect to incur additional costs
related to compliance, reporting and insurance in 2011, our
first full year operating as a public company.
Acquisition Related Costs. Acquisition related costs
totaled $2.5 million in 2010 and are associated with the
acquisition of our Refill Business. The acquisition related
costs consist primarily of a transaction fee of
$1.5 million along with professional and other expenses of
approximately $0.6 million and severance costs of
$0.4 million. We expect to incur acquisition related costs
in 2011 related to the integration of the Refill Business and
the acquisitions described in the Recent
Transactions section above in the range of $1.0 to
$2.0 million
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and
amortization increased 13.2% to $4.8 million for 2010. The
increase is primarily due to approximately $0.4 million in
depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition of the
Refill Business, which included approximately $18.5 million
in property and equipment and approximately $10.3 million
in identifiable intangible assets. We expect depreciation to
increase in 2011 as a result of the impact of a full year of
depreciation and amortization related to the acquisition of the
Refill Business as well as for increases in capital expenditures
related to the addition of new locations.
Interest (Expense) and Other Income, Net. Net
interest expense increased to $3.4 million for 2010 from
$2.3 million for 2009. The increase is a result of an
increase in the use of debt to fund business operations prior to
41
our IPO in November 2010. In addition, the subordinated notes
entered into in December 2009 and September 2010, were at a
higher interest then our previous debt. In November 2010, in
connection with the completion of our IPO, the subordinated
notes were paid in full and retired. We expect interest expense
to decrease significantly for 2011 as a result of lower debt
levels and lower interest rates.
Preferred Dividends, Beneficial Conversion and Warrant
Modification Charges. Preferred dividends, beneficial
conversion and warrant modification charges increased by
$6.8 million in 2010 to $9.9 million. Dividends on our
Series B preferred stock decreased $1.0 million to
$2.0 million for 2010. In January 2009, we offered holders
of our Series B preferred stock the option to suspend their
current cash dividend payment of 10% in exchange for a dividend
accrual of 15% for 2009. In January 2010, the dividend accrual
was reduced to 10% with no cash dividend until the Series B
preferred stock was converted or redeemed. In November 2010, in
connection with the completion of our IPO, 50% of Series B
preferred stock was redeemed along with all unpaid and accrued
dividends. The remaining 50% of the Series B preferred
stock was converted into shares of common stock.
The Company also incurred non-cash beneficial conversion charges
of $2.9 million associated with its Series B preferred
stock and $2.4 million associated with its Series C
preferred stock upon the completion of its IPO in November 2010.
In addition, for 2010, we incurred a $2.3 million charge
related to the modification to the terms of warrants issued to
the holders of Series B preferred stock and Series C
preferred stock to remove a provision that accelerated the
termination of the warrants exercise period upon the
consummation of an IPO. The warrants will now expire on the date
such warrants would have otherwise expired absent an IPO. We do
not expect to incur charges for dividends or beneficial
conversion charges in the future.
Year
Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for 2009 increased
$12.3 million or 35.6% to $47.0 million from
$34.6 million in 2008. The increase in sales resulted
primarily from a 65.9% increase in Products sales and a 17.7%
increase in Exchange sales.
Water. Water net sales increased $3.1 million
or 14.9% to $24.2 million in 2009, representing 51.6% of
our total net sales in 2009. The increase was due to an increase
in five-gallon equivalent units sold of approximately
0.6 million units or 20.3% to 3.7 million units sold
in 2009. The increase in units sold was driven by a same store
sales increase of 7.9% as well as an 8.3% increase in selling
locations to approximately 7,000 at December 31, 2009. We
believe the increase in same store sales is primarily a result
of two factors: first, the increase in water dispenser sales
results in an increasing number of consumers of multi-gallon
bottled water and second, as more consumers become aware of and
participate in our exchange services at a particular selling
location, the number of water bottle units sold at that location
typically increases over comparable prior periods. During 2009,
we added approximately 600 selling locations as a result of both
adding new retail customers and increased penetration with our
existing retail customers. The average price per unit decreased
1.7% in 2009 compared to 2008 as a result of a shift in mix of
transactions to 70.9% exchange and 29.1% non-exchange
transactions in 2009 compared to 63.2% exchange and 36.8%
non-exchange transactions in 2008. The shift in the mix of
transactions is due to the increase in the overall number of
repeat consumers utilizing our multi-gallon exchange service
compared to the number of consumers that are new to our service.
We recognize approximately twice as much revenue on non-exchange
transactions as we do on exchange transactions as a result of
the discount provided to consumers for the return of an empty
multi-gallon bottle in exchange for the purchase of a new
multi-gallon bottle of purified water.
Products. Products net sales increased
$9.1 million or 65.9% to $22.8 million in 2009,
representing 48.6% of our total net sales in 2009. Dispenser
sales increased 95,000 units or 53% to approximately
272,000 units in 2009. The increase in sales and units in
2009 is primarily a result of a greater than 100% increase in
the number of retail locations offering our dispensers to
approximately 5,500 at December 31, 2009. The difference in
growth rates in net sales compared to the number of retail
locations at which our water dispensers are offered is the
result of retail locations being added during the course of the
year which did not sell our water dispensers during the entire
twelve-month period. As a result, during a period in which we
experience rapid growth in the number of retail locations at
which our water dispensers are offered, there is a delay before
the full effect of these additional retail locations is
reflected in our net sales. In addition, we successfully
launched several new water dispenser models which accounted for
approximately 48% of the total units sold in 2009.
42
Gross Margin. Our overall gross margin, defined as
net sales less cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales
increased to 17.5% for 2009 from 11.2% for 2008.
Water. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales in
our Water segment increased to 28.6% for 2009 from 19.4% in 2008
due primarily to decreased freight costs as a result of the
addition of bottling and distribution capabilities during 2008
for which we received a full-year benefit in 2009. With these
additions we believe we have sufficient bottling and
distribution capabilities to service our continued growth.
Products. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales
in our Products segment improved to 5.6% for 2009 from 0.5% in
2008 due primarily to improved pricing from retailers. Our
strategy is to sell our water dispensers at minimal operating
profit in order to increase home penetration, which we believe
will lead to increased recurring-revenue, higher margin Exchange
sales.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
for 2009 decreased $3.9 million or 28.1% to
$9.9 million from $13.8 million and, as a percentage
of net sales, decreased to 21.1% for 2009 from 39.8% for 2008.
Water. Selling, general and administrative expenses
of our Water segment decreased $1.6 million or 31.1% to
$3.6 million from $5.2 million and as a percentage of
Water segment net sales decreased to 14.8% in 2009 from 24.7% in
2008. The decrease is due to lower employee-related costs as a
result of a reduction in headcount of seven employees as well as
reduced levels of consulting fees and related travel and benefit
costs resulting in approximately $1.0 million of the
overall reduction of selling, general and administrative
expenses. The additional personnel resources were related to our
efforts in 2008 to expand our supply chain with more bottling
and distribution capacity. During 2009 we were able to reduce
these personnel resources when our supply chain reached what we
believe to be an appropriate size. We were able to significantly
grow our Water segment net sales and gross margins in 2009
despite the reduction in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Products. Selling, general and administrative
expenses of our Products segment decreased as a percentage of
Products segment net sales to 6.8% in 2009 from 11.1% in 2008.
Our Products segment was able to significantly increase sales
without the need for additional headcount or selling, general
and administrative costs.
Corporate. Corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses for 2009, decreased $2.3 million or
32.3% to $4.8 million from $7.1 million, and as a
percent of consolidated net sales decreased to 10.2% for 2009
from 20.4% in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to lower
employee-related costs as a result of a reduction in headcount
of nine employees as well as reduced levels of consulting fees
and related travel and benefit costs resulting in about
$1.6 million of the overall reduction of selling, general
and administrative expenses. The additional resources were
related to our efforts in 2008 to expand our information system
and financial infrastructure as well as our efforts to establish
new business segments.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and
amortization increased $0.6 million or 16.2% to
$4.2 million in 2009 from $3.6 million in 2008. The
increase is the result of a full year of depreciation on the
$8.3 million of capital expenditures in 2008.
Interest (Expense) and Other Income, Net. Net
interest expense for 2009 increased to $2.3 million from
$70,000 in 2008 as a result of increased use of debt to fund
business operations.
Preferred Dividends and Beneficial Conversion
Charge. Dividends on our Series B preferred stock
increased $0.7 million to $3.0 million in 2009 from
$2.3 million in 2008. In January 2009, we offered holders
of our Series B preferred stock the option to suspend their
current cash dividend payment of 10% in exchange for a dividend
accrual of 15% for 2009. Cash dividends paid on our
Series B preferred stock during 2009 and 2008 were
$1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008 the accrued and unpaid dividends
on our Series B preferred stock were $2.4 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, which is included in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet. Our Series C preferred stock was convertible
into common stock at a ratio of 1:0.184, which was based upon a
formula taking into account sales for 2008, compared to the
original conversion ratio of 1:0.096. The change in the
conversion resulted in a $17.6 million beneficial
conversion
43
or deemed dividend on the Series C preferred stock for
2008, which is included in the $19.9 million preferred
dividends and beneficial conversion charge in 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following table shows the components of our cash flows for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(11,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,972
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,871
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,420
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(9,628
|
)
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
(80,967
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(4,469
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
24,361
|
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
89,277
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
Since our inception we have financed our operations primarily
through the sale of stock, the issuance of debt and borrowings
under credit facilities. On November 10, 2010, we completed
an IPO of 8.3 million shares of our common stock at a price
of $12.00 per share. In addition, on November 18, 2010, we
issued an additional 1.3 million shares upon the exercise
of the over-allotment option by the underwriters of our IPO. The
net proceeds of the IPO after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions were approximately $106.9 million.
At March 31, 2011, our principal sources of liquidity were
accounts receivable of $9.3 million, cash of
$1.1 million and borrowing availability under our senior
revolving credit facility of $7.2 million. During 2010, our
primary sources of capital were proceeds from our initial public
offering and borrowing availability under our senior revolving
credit facility, which had a balance of $10.0 million at
December 31, 2010. During 2009, the primary source of
capital was proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and, as
of December 31, 2009, we had an outstanding debt balance of
$14.8 million, net of a $0.6 million discount. During
2008, our primary source of capital was the proceeds of
preferred stock issuances of $19.6 million. Additionally,
during 2008 we made borrowings under our current senior
revolving credit facility, which had a balance of
$7.0 million at December 31, 2008.
Net Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
During the first three months of 2011, cash provided by
operations was $2.4 million primarily as a result of
$2.1 million provided from changes in working capital items
related to accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and
accrued expenses. This increase, due to working capital items,
is a result of a record number of installations of new Water
retail locations in 2011, which were completed in the latter
half of the first quarter. During the first three months of
2010, we used $1.7 million in operations primarily as a
result of a net loss of $2.5 million, offset by non-cash
depreciation and amortization of $1.0 million.
During 2010, we used $7.9 million in operations primarily
as a result of a $12.9 million loss from continuing
operations and a $1.6 million increase in working capital
components, offset by non-cash depreciation and amortization of
$4.8 million, non-cash interest expense of
$1.2 million and stock-based compensation expense of
$0.7 million.
Net cash used in operating activities was $2.0 million for
2009 and $11.8 million for 2008. For 2009, net cash used in
operations was primarily the result of an $8.2 million loss
from continuing operations, partially offset by non-cash
depreciation and amortization of $4.2 million, non-cash
interest expense of $0.7 million related to our long-term
debt issuances and reduction in working capital components of
$0.8 million. For 2008, net cash used in operations was
primarily the result of a $13.6 million loss from
continuing operations, partially offset by depreciation and
amortization of $3.6 million. Additional working capital
for accounts receivable and inventory due to revenue growth
resulted in a use of cash of $1.9 million and
$1.3 million, respectively, and was partially offset by an
increase in accounts payable of $1.1 million.
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Our primary investing activities are capital expenditures for
property, equipment and bottles. Our capital expenditures in the
past have been primarily for the installation of our recycle
centers and display racks at new
44
Water locations. We also invest in technology infrastructure to
manage our national network. During the first three months of
2011 and 2010, cash flows from investing activities primarily
consisted of capital expenditures for property, equipment and
bottles of $2.2 million and $0.6 million,
respectively. Additionally, we completed the acquisition of the
Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business in March 2011, which
included a cash payment of $1.6 million.
During 2010, cash used in investing activities was
$81.0 million primarily as a result of our acquisition of
the Refill Business. On November 10, 2010, we completed the
acquisition of the Refill Business for a total purchase price of
$109.1 million, which was paid by $74.5 million in
proceeds from our IPO and the issuance of approximately
2.6 million common shares. Other investing activities
included capital expenditures for property, equipment and
bottles of $6.4 million. Our capital expenditures are
primarily for the installation of our recycle centers and
display racks at new locations that offer our water bottle
exchange service as well as related transportation racks and
bottles. We also invest in technology infrastructure to manage
our distribution network.
During 2009 and 2008 cash flows from investing activities were
primarily a result of capital expenditures for property and
equipment and bottles of $2.4 million and
$9.4 million, respectively.
Net Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
During the first three months of 2011, cash provided by
financing activities was primarily from the net borrowings under
senior revolving credit facility of $2.7 million. During
the first three months of 2010, cash provided by financing
activities was primarily from borrowings under our prior senior
revolving credit facility of $3.9 million offset by
dividends paid of $0.2 million and equity issuance costs of
$0.9 million.
During 2010, cash provided by financing activities was primarily
from our issuance of common stock in connection with our IPO.
The proceeds from the IPO, net of underwriting discounts,
commissions and issuance costs were $104.2 million. On
November 10, 2010, we used the proceeds of our IPO along
with $15.0 million in borrowings under our new senior
revolving credit facility to: (i) repay outstanding
borrowings under our prior senior loan agreement of
approximately $7.9 million; (ii) repay subordinated
debt and accrued interest of approximately $18.7 million;
(iii) redeem 50% of the outstanding Series B preferred
stock along with all unpaid and accrued dividends totaling
approximately $15.8 million; and (iv) pay fees and
expenses of approximately $5.0 million in connection with
all of the foregoing items.
Prior to our IPO we had net borrowings under our prior senior
loan agreement of approximately $6.5 million and had
borrowings from subordinated debt of $3.4 million. We also
paid dividends of approximately $0.2 million prior to our
IPO. Subsequent to our IPO we had borrowings of
$15.3 million and payments of $13.3 million under our
new senior revolving credit facility. We also incurred
$1.5 million in costs associated with our new senior
revolving credit facility.
For 2009, financing activities were primarily the issuance of
long-term debt of $20.4 million that was partially offset
by payments of $6.6 million on our prior senior loan
agreement, payments of $5.4 million related to other
long-term
debt, Series B preferred stock dividend payments of
$1.3 million and payment of debt issuance costs of
$0.6 million. The cash component of our Series B
preferred stock dividends was partially reduced in 2009 and
accrued as opposed to paid currently.
For 2008, financing activities were primarily the issuance of
preferred stock of $19.6 million and borrowings of
$7.0 million on our prior senior loan agreement that were
partially offset by payments of $2.3 million of
Series B preferred stock dividends.
Senior
Revolving Credit Facility
On November 10, 2010, we closed our IPO and entered into a
$40.0 million senior revolving credit facility with Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and
Branch Banking & Trust Company that replaced our
Prior Senior Loan Agreement (as defined below). On
April 11, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business, our lenders consented
to such acquisition and amended certain financial covenants in
the senior revolving credit facility (such credit facility as so
amended is referred to as our Senior Revolving Credit
Facility). The Senior Revolving Credit Facility expires in
November 2013 and is secured by substantially all of the assets
of the Company.
45
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Senior
Revolving Credit Facility is payable at our option at either a
floating base rate plus an interest rate spread or a floating
rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread. Both the interest
rate spreads and the commitment fee rate are determined from a
pricing grid based on our total leverage ratio. The Senior
Revolving Credit Facility also provides for letters of credit
issued to our vendors, which reduce the amount available for
cash borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee on the
unused amounts of the commitments under the Senior Revolving
Credit Facility. At March 31, 2011, the base rate and
floating LIBOR borrowings outstanding were $5.6 million and
$15.0 million, respectively, at interest rates of 5.25% and
3.27%, respectively. At March 31, 2011, there were no
outstanding letters of credit under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility. The availability under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility was approximately $7.2 million, based upon the
maximum leverage ratio allowed at March 31, 2011.
The Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains various
restrictive covenants and the following financial covenants:
(i) a maximum total leverage ratio that for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 is set at 3.25 to 1.0 and steps up to
3.5 to 1.0 for the period beginning April 1, 2011 and
ending June 30, 2011, steps down to 2.75 to 1.0 for the
period beginning July 1, 2011 and ending September 30,
2011 and further steps down to 2.5 to 1.0 for the period
beginning October 1, 2011 and continuing until the
termination of the Senior Revolving Credit Facility; (ii) a
minimum EBITDA threshold that is currently set at
$7.5 million and increases to $9.0 million for the
twelve-month period ended June 30, 2011; (iii) a
minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 beginning with the
quarter ended September 30, 2011; and (iv) a maximum
amount of capital expenditures of $25.0 million for the
year ending December 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011, the
Company was in compliance with all the terms and conditions of
the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
Prior
Senior Loan Agreement
In June 2005, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement that
was subsequently amended (the Prior Senior Loan
Agreement). The facility provided for an up to
$10.0 million revolving loan commitment (the
Revolver). The Revolver was subject to certain
borrowing base restrictions based on eligible accounts
receivable, eligible inventory less reserves, and the aggregate
face amount of undrawn trade letters of credit of which the
Company was the beneficiary. The Revolver also provided for
letters of credit issued to our vendors, which reduced the
amount available for cash borrowings. The Seventh Amendment to
the Senior Loan Agreement extended the term of the agreement to
January 30, 2011, allowed for up to a $3.0 million
over-advance (Overadvance Line), which was
guaranteed by our CEO, and amended the agreements
financial covenants. At December 31, 2009, there were
outstanding letters of credit under the Revolver totaling
approximately $371,000. In connection with the completion of our
IPO, the Prior Senior Loan Agreement was paid in full and
replaced with the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Revolver were
payable quarterly at the option of the Company at (i) the
LIBOR Market Index Rate (LMIR) plus the applicable
margin or (ii) the greater of (a) the federal funds
rate plus .50% or (b) the banks prime rate plus in
either case the applicable margin. At December 31, 2009,
the interest rate on the outstanding balance on the Revolver was
based on the banks prime rate plus 2.50% (5.75% at
December 31, 2009).
The Overadvance Line was personally guaranteed by Billy Prim,
our Chief Executive Officer. As an inducement to Mr. Prim
to guarantee the $3.0 million Overadvance Line, the Company
issued Mr. Prim $150,000 of restricted stock
(12,500 shares) with the per share value equal to the
initial public offering price of $12.00 per share. The
restricted stock was issued in November 2010 and vested in full
on January 2, 2011. The award of restricted stock was
approved by the independent members of the board of directors
and the amount of the award was based upon 5% of the guaranteed
obligations (which the board members believed was an appropriate
amount in light of their experience with similar transactions
and representative of a 2.5% commitment fee and a 2.5% draw-down
fee).
14%
Subordinated Convertible Notes due March 31, 2011
In December 2009 and October 2010, we issued our
14% subordinated convertible notes due March 31, 2011
(Notes) to 34 investors, including existing
stockholders, affiliates of existing stockholders and senior
management. The Notes had a total face value of
$18.4 million and were subordinated to the Prior Senior
Loan Agreement.
46
The Notes paid quarterly interest at 14% and were paid in full
in November 2010 using the proceeds from our IPO and closing of
the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
Warrants to purchase 130,747 shares of our common stock
were issued in connection with the Notes. The initial fair value
of the warrants was approximately $0.7 million and resulted
in an original issue discount on the Notes that was amortized
into interest expense over the term of the Notes with the
unamortized balance being expensed when the Notes were paid in
full in November 2010. The fair value of the warrants was
initially included in other long-term liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet based upon estimated fair value as
adjusted periodically until such time that the exercise price
became fixed at the IPO date, at which time the then fair value
was reclassified as a component of stockholders equity
(deficit). In connection with our IPO the exercise price per
share of the warrants was fixed at $9.60, or 80% of the initial
public offering price per share of our common stock.
Adequacy
of Capital Resources
Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those
now anticipated and will depend on many factors, including
acquisitions of other businesses, the rate of growth in new
locations and related display and rack costs, cost to develop
new water dispensers, sales and marketing resources needed to
further penetrate our markets, the expansion of our operations
in the United States and Canada as well as the response of
competitors to our solutions and products. Historically, we have
experienced increases in our capital expenditures consistent
with the growth in our operations and personnel, and we
anticipate that our expenditures will continue to increase as we
grow our business.
While we had no material commitments for capital expenditures as
of March 31, 2011, we do anticipate incurring between
$17.0 million and $20.0 million of capital
expenditures related to our anticipated growth in locations and
new water dispenser lines for 2011. In addition, in connection
with our acquisitions of the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
and the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business, we are making
cash payments of approximately $6.6 million in 2011.
We believe our cash, funds available under our Senior Revolving
Credit Facility and future cash flows from our operations will
be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated working capital
and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next
twelve months.
During the last three years, trends and conditions in the retail
environment and credit markets, inflation and changing prices
have not had a material effect on our business and we do not
expect that these trends and conditions, inflation or changing
prices will materially affect our business in the foreseeable
future.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments
in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt.
Additionally, we are not a party to any derivative contracts or
synthetic leases.
Contractual
and Commercial Commitment Summary
Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of
December 31, 2010 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
Than
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
17,912
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,912
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes payable and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payment
obligations(1)
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,808
|
|
|
$
|
1,361
|
|
|
$
|
20,118
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents estimated interest
payments to be made on our long-term debt, capital leases and
notes payable. All interest payments assume that principal
payments are made as originally scheduled. Interest rates
utilized to determine interest payments for our variable rate
long-term debt are based upon our outstanding balances and their
current interest rates.
|
47
Inflation
During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have
not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect
that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our
business in the foreseeable future.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest
rates on borrowings under our Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
Our Senior Revolving Credit Facility bears interest based on
LIBOR or the prime rate plus in each case an applicable margin.
To quantify our exposure to interest rate risk, a 100 basis
point increase in interest rates would have increased interest
expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, and
2010 by approximately $29,000, $132,000 and $204,000,
respectively. Actual changes in interest rates may differ
materially from the hypothetical assumptions used in computing
this exposure.
Diesel
Fuel Price Fluctuation Risk
We are impacted by fluctuations in diesel fuel prices with our
company-owned operations and distribution network. To quantify
our exposure to diesel fuel prices, a $0.42 increase in diesel
prices would have an approximate 1.0% impact on our Exchange
gross margin.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
Our results of operations and cash flows are not materially
affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
Seasonality
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience
seasonal fluctuations in our sales and operating income. Our
sales and operating income have been highest in the spring and
summer, and lowest in the fall and winter. Our Water operations,
which generally enjoys higher margins than our Products segment,
experiences higher sales and operating income in the spring and
summer. Our Products segment had historically experienced higher
sales and operating income in spring and summer, however, we
believe the seasonality of this segment will be more dependent
on retailer inventory management and purchasing cycles and not
correlated to weather. Sustained periods of poor weather,
particularly in the spring and summer, can negatively impact our
sales in our higher margin Water segment. Accordingly, our
results of operations in any quarter will not necessarily be
indicative of the results that we may achieve for a fiscal year
or any future quarter.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of
our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to
make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe
that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used to determine
certain amounts that affect the financial statements are
reasonable, based on information available at the time they are
made. To the extent there are material differences between these
estimates, judgments and assumptions and actual results, our
consolidated financial statements may be affected. Some of the
more significant estimates include allowances for doubtful
accounts, valuation of inventories, depreciation, valuation of
intangible assets and goodwill, valuation of deferred taxes and
allowance for sales returns.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized for the
sale of multi-gallon purified bottled water upon either the
delivery of inventory to the retail stores or the purchase by
the consumer. Revenue is either recognized as an exchange
transaction (where a discount is provided on the purchase of a
multi-gallon bottle of purified water for the return of an empty
multi-gallon bottle) or a non-exchange transaction. Revenues on
exchange transactions are recognized net of the exchange
discount. Self-serve filtered water revenue is recognized at the
time the water is
48
filtered which is measured by the water dispensing equipment
meter. Our water dispensers are sold primarily through a
direct-import model, where we recognize revenue when title is
transferred to our retail customers. We have no contractual
obligation to accept returns of water dispensers nor do we
guarantee water dispenser sales. However, we will at times
accept returns or issue credits for water dispensers that have
manufacturer defects or that were damaged in transit. Revenues
of water dispensers are recognized net of an estimated allowance
for returns using an average return rate based upon historical
experience. In addition, we offer certain incentives such as
coupons and rebates that are netted against and reduce net sales
in the consolidated statements of operations. Historically,
these incentives have not been material to the overall
consolidated results of operations. With the purchase of certain
of our water dispensers we include a coupon for a free
multi-gallon bottle of water. No revenue is recognized with
respect to the redemption of the coupon for a free multi-gallon
bottle of water and the estimated cost of the multi-gallon
bottle of water is included in cost of sales.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting
from our retail customers inability to pay us. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of
specifically identified accounts in addition to an overall aging
analysis. Judgments are made with respect to the collectability
of accounts receivable based on historical experience and
current economic trends. Actual losses could differ from those
estimates.
Long-Lived Assets. We review long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying
amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds
the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from
the use and eventual disposition of the asset at the date it is
tested for recoverability, whether in use or under development.
An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the
carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. We
recorded an impairment charge in 2008 of $98,000, related to
display racks no longer in use and to be disposed.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We classify
intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible
assets with definite lives subject to amortization,
(2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to
amortization and (3) goodwill. We determine the useful
lives of our identifiable intangible assets after considering
the specific facts and circumstances related to each intangible
asset. Factors we consider when determining useful lives include
the contractual term of any agreement related to the asset, the
historical performance of the asset, the Companys
long-term strategy for using the asset, any laws or other local
regulations which could impact the useful life of the asset, and
other economic factors, including competition and specific
market conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to have
definite lives are amortized, primarily on a straight-line
basis, over their useful lives.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful
lives, including trademarks and goodwill, for impairment
annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate
that assets might be impaired. Our Company performs these annual
impairment reviews as of the first day of our fourth quarter.
The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if
necessary. The first step involves a comparison of the fair
value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. The fair value
is estimated based on a number of factors including operating
results, business plans and future cash flows. If the carrying
amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second
step of the process is performed which compares the implied
value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying value of
the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of
the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value
of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. No impairment charge was considered
necessary at March 31, 2011. For indefinite-lived
intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount
exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an
amount equal to that excess. Intangible assets not subject to
amortization are tested for impairment on an annual basis or
more frequently if indicators of impairment are present.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes using the
asset and liability method, which requires recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial
statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities,
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are
reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that utilization
is not presently more likely than not.
49
As required by Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
740-10, we
recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only
after determining that the relevant tax authority would more
likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax
positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount
recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit
that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax
authority.
Stock-Based Compensation. We account for our
stock-based employee and director compensation plans in
accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation.
ASC 718 requires recognition of the cost of employee
services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments
in the financial statements over the period the employee is
required to perform the services in exchange for the award
(presumptively the vesting period).
In 2008, 2009 and 2010 compensation expense related to stock
options was approximately $215,000, $298,000 and $387,000 and is
included in selling, general and administrative expenses from
continuing operations, respectively, and approximately $61,000,
$80,000 and $0 is included in discontinued operations,
respectively.
We measure the fair value of each stock option grant at the date
of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
weighted-average fair value per share of the options granted
during 2008, 2009, 2010 and the three months ended
March 31, 2011 was $8.66, $5.11, $6.16 and $5.98,
respectively. The following assumptions were used in arriving at
the fair value of options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
Expected life of options in years
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield
available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a
remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of our
stock options. The estimated pre-vesting forfeiture rate is
based on our historical experience. The expected term of the
options is based on evaluations of historical and expected
future employee exercise behavior. As a non-public entity,
historic volatility is not available for our shares. As a
result, we estimated volatility based on a peer group of
companies, which we believe collectively provide a reasonable
basis for estimating volatility. We intend to continue to
consistently use the same group of publicly traded peer
companies to determine volatility in the future until sufficient
information regarding volatility of our share price becomes
available or the selected companies are no longer suitable for
this purpose. We do not expect to declare dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. As of each stock option
grant date, we considered the fair value of the underlying
common stock, determined as described below, in order to
establish the option exercise price.
During 2009, a total of 13,607 common stock options were
granted, all on one date during the quarter ended March 31,
2009, at an exercise price of $13.04 per share. The estimated
fair value of our common stock on the issuance date was $13.04
per share. During 2010, a total of 31,146 common stock options
were granted, all in the first quarter of 2010, at an exercise
price of $12.84 per share. The estimated fair value of our
common stock on the issuance date was $12.84 per share. In March
2011, we granted 162,000 common stock options which cliff-vest
annually over a three year period. During the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2011, we recognized compensation expense
related to stock options of approximately $118,000 and $2,000,
respectively.
In April 2010, the Board of Directors approved the 100% vesting
of all unvested stock option awards upon the successful
completion of an IPO of the Companys common stock. The IPO
was completed in November 2010 and all unrecognized compensation
cost related to the stock option awards that became 100% vested
was expensed in the fourth quarter. At December 31, 2010,
we had approximately 304,000 stock options outstanding, all of
which were vested with an intrinsic value of approximately
$653,000.
In addition, we granted 105,636 shares of restricted stock
in 2010 that generally cliff-vest over a three-year period and
we recognized compensation expense of approximately $298,000
related to these awards in 2010, which is included in selling,
general, and administrative expenses from continuing operations.
During the three months
50
ended March 31, 2011, we awarded 81,000 restricted stock
units, which generally cliff-vest annually over a three year
period. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2011, we recognized compensation expense of approximately
$40,000 and $186,000 related to these awards, which is included
in selling, general, and administrative expenses. In addition,
in connection with the guarantee of the $3.0 million
over-advance line of our Prior Senior Loan Agreement by our CEO,
we granted a restricted stock award, in the fourth quarter of
2010, which vested in January 2011. The value of the restricted
stock was $150,000, based upon our IPO price of $12.00 per
share, and was expensed in 2010 as part of the issuance cost of
the Prior Senior Loan Agreement.
Significant Factors Used in Determining Fair Value of Our
Common Stock. The fair value of the shares of common
stock that underlie the stock options we have granted has
historically been determined by our board of directors based
upon information available to it at the time of grant. Because,
prior to our IPO, there was no public market for our common
stock, our board of directors has determined the fair value of
our common stock by utilizing, among other things, recent or
contemporaneous valuation information from negotiated equity
transactions with third parties or third party valuations. The
valuation information included reviews of our business and
general economic, market and other conditions that could be
reasonably evaluated at that time, including our financial
results, business agreements, intellectual property and capital
structure. These valuation approaches are based on a number of
assumptions, including our future sales and industry, general
economic, market and other conditions that could reasonably be
evaluated at the time of the valuation.
For the 13,607 stock options granted on one date in the first
quarter of 2009, the fair value of our common stock was
determined by the board of directors to be $13.04 per share. The
fair value was based in part upon the finalization of the
conversion ratio of the Series C Preferred Stock on
December 31, 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock was
issued in an arms-length transaction primarily to unrelated
third parties in 2008 with an initial conversion to common stock
ratio of 1:0.096 or $25.04 per share. However, the Series C
Preferred Stock contained a beneficial conversion feature that
was negotiated with the primarily unrelated third parties that
adjusted and was finalized based upon the consolidated net sales
for the year ending December 31, 2008. The adjusted
conversion ratio was 1:0.184 or $13.04 per share. In addition,
the board of directors considered the Companys most recent
independent valuation and then current expectations of the
Companys future performance in determining that $13.04 per
share was a reasonable fair valuation of common stock at
December 31, 2008 and that there were not any significant
changes in the business or results of operations from
December 31, 2008 to the date in the first quarter of 2009
the stock options were issued that would change that estimated
fair value.
For the 31,146 stock options and 105,636 restricted stock awards
granted during the first quarter of 2010, the fair value of our
common stock was determined by the board of directors to be
$12.84 per share. The fair value was based upon a valuation
obtained by the Company from an unrelated party in December 2009
that determined the fair value of the Companys common
stock to be $12.84 per share. The fair value method utilized by
the unrelated party was the income approach. The income approach
recognizes that the current value is premised upon the expected
receipt of future economic benefits or cash flows. The fair
value is developed utilizing managements estimates of
expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present
value utilizing a discount rate of 20.0%. In addition, there
were not any significant changes in the business, results of
operations or expected future cash flows from the valuation date
in December 2009 to the dates in the first quarter of 2010 the
stock options and restricted stock awards were granted that
would change the estimated fair value.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-28
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This
update provides amendments to ASC Topic 350
Intangibles, Goodwill and Other that requires an entity to
perform Step 2 impairment test even if a reporting unit has zero
or negative carrying amount. The first step is to identify
potential impairments by comparing the estimated fair value of a
reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the
carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair
value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. The second step is to determine the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill, measured in
the same manner as goodwill is recognized in a business
combination, and compare that amount with the carrying amount of
the goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an
51
amount equal to that excess. ASU
No. 2010-28
is effective beginning January 1, 2011. As a result of this
standard, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under
current practice. We do not expect ASU
No. 2010-28
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-29,
which contains updated accounting guidance to clarify the
acquisition date that should be used for reporting pro forma
financial information when comparative financial statements are
issued. This update requires that a company should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the
business combination(s) that occurred during the current year
had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual
reporting period only. This update also requires disclosure of
the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments. The provisions of this update, which are to be
applied prospectively, are effective for business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The
impact of this update on the Companys consolidated
financial statements will depend on the size and nature of
future business combinations.
52
BUSINESS
Company
Background
We are a rapidly growing provider of multi-gallon purified
bottled water, self-serve filtered drinking water, and water
dispensers sold through major retailers in the United States and
Canada. Our products provide an environmentally friendly,
economical, convenient and healthy solution for consuming
purified and filtered water. We are a Delaware corporation that
was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina. On November 10, 2010, in connection with our
initial public offering (IPO), we purchased certain
assets from Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan Canada
related to their business of providing reverse osmosis water
filtration systems that generate filtered water for refill
vending machines and store-use water services in the United
States and Canada. This business also sells empty reusable water
bottles for use at refill vending machines and is referred to
herein as the Refill Business. References to
Primo, the Company, we,
us or our refer to Primos business
as a whole and include the Refill Business unless the context
requires otherwise.
Our business is designed to generate recurring demand for our
bottled water through the sale of innovative water dispensers.
This business strategy is commonly referred to as
razor-razorblade because the initial sale of a
product creates a base of users who frequently purchase
complementary consumable products. We believe dispenser owners
consume an average of 35 multi-gallon bottles of water annually.
Once our bottled water is consumed using a water dispenser,
empty bottles are either exchanged at our recycling center
displays, which provide a recycling ticket that offers a
discount toward the purchase of a new bottle of Primo purified
water (exchange) or they can be refilled at a self-serve
filtered drinking water vending location (refill). Each of our
three-and five-gallon water bottles can be sanitized and reused
up to 40 times before being taken out of use, crushed and
recycled, substantially reducing landfill waste compared to
consumption of equivalent volumes of single-serve bottled water.
As of March 31, 2011, our exchange and refill services were
offered in each of the contiguous United States and in Canada at
approximately 14,600 combined retail locations, including
Lowes Home Improvement, Walmart, Kroger, Safeway,
Albertsons, Winn-Dixie, H-E-B Grocery and Walgreens.
We provide major retailers throughout the United States and
Canada with single-vendor solutions for water bottle exchange
and refill vending services, addressing a market demand that we
believe was previously unmet. Our solutions are easy for
retailers to implement, require minimal management supervision
and store-based labor and provide centralized billing and
detailed performance reports. Our exchange solution offers
retailers attractive financial margins and the ability to
optimize typically unused retail space with our displays. Our
refill solution provides filtered water through the installation
and servicing of reverse osmosis water filtration systems in the
back room of the retailers store location, which minimizes
the usage of the customers retail space. The refill
vending machine, which is typically accompanied by a sales
display containing empty reusable bottles, is located within the
retailer customers floor space. Additionally, due to the
recurring nature of water consumption, retailers benefit from
year-round customer traffic and highly predictable revenue.
Recent
Developments
Purchase
of Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
of Culligan Canadas assets related to its bulk water
exchange business (the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business). The consideration paid for the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business was approximately $5.4 million,
which consisted of a cash payment of approximately
$1.6 million and the issuance of 307,217 shares of our
common stock, and the assumption of certain specified
liabilities (the Canada Bulk Water Transaction). The
Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business provides refill and delivery
of water in 18-liter containers to commercial retailers in
Canada for resale to consumers.
The acquisition of the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
expands our existing exchange service offering and provides us
with an immediate network of regional operators and major
retailers in Canada (including Walmart,
53
Sobeys, The Home Depot and Zellers) with 780 retail locations.
We believe the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business acquisition
will allow us to:
|
|
|
|
|
address industry trends within Canada that support consumer
demand for a water bottle exchange service;
|
|
|
utilize our competitive strengths and supply chain to deliver
the same benefits to Canadian retailers and consumers that we
provide in our Primo water bottle exchange business;
|
|
|
leverage the existing third-party Culligan Canada dealer network
to serve as Primos distributors and bottlers for our
Canadian retailer water bottle exchange operations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
complement our existing Canadian refill operations by delivering
single-vendor solutions of water bottle exchange and refill
vending services for retailers and consumers in Canada;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leverage newly-acquired exchange locations to develop and expand
business relationships with Canadian retailers where
relationships previously did not exist;
|
|
|
|
|
|
install and service new Canadian retailers with single-vendor
solutions throughout Canada; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
install and service both new and existing U.S. retailers
with single-vendor solutions as they expand their retail
locations into and throughout Canada.
|
Purchase
of Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
On April 11, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
intellectual property and other assets (the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business) from Omnifrio Beverage
Company, LLC (Omnifrio) for total consideration of
up to approximately $13.2 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
a cash payment at closing of $2.0 million;
|
|
|
the issuance at closing of 501,080 shares of our common
stock;
|
|
|
a cash payment of $2.0 million on the
15-month
anniversary of the closing date (subject to our setoff rights in
the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement);
|
|
|
up to $3.0 million in cash milestone payments; and
|
|
|
the assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business.
|
The Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business primarily consists
of technology related to single-serve cold carbonated beverage
appliances and consumable flavor cups, or S-cups,
and
CO2
cylinders used with the appliances to make a variety of cold
beverages.
The acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
serves as an entry point into the U.S. market for
carbonated beverages and the rapidly growing self-carbonating
appliance and single-serve beverage segments. According to a
November 2010 report by independent market analyst Datamonitor,
Carbonated Soft Drinks in the United States, the U.S.
carbonated beverage market generated revenue of $62 billion in
2009 and is the worlds largest carbonated beverage market.
We believe the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business
acquisition will allow us to:
|
|
|
|
|
complement our existing water bottle exchange and refill vending
services with a new razor-razorblade business
segment that is designed to generate recurring demand for our
bottled water, consumable flavor cups, or S cups,
and
CO2
cylinders through the sale of our appliances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
broaden the single-vendor solutions that we provide existing
retail relationships;
|
|
|
|
|
|
enhance the attractiveness of our product offering for new
retail relationships;
|
|
|
increase our household adoption and penetration with an enhanced
beverage product offering for consumers;
|
|
|
provide consumers with an innovative alternative to existing
packaged carbonated beverages that includes customization of
flavor, carbonation level and drink volume;
|
|
|
sell additional products that reduce waste in landfills;
|
|
|
utilize our competitive strengths and supply chain to deliver
the same benefits for retailers and consumers as our current
business segments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leverage our existing distribution infrastructure in order to
offer retailers an exchange program for the
CO2
cylinders used with our appliances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leverage our existing set of diverse nationwide retail locations
to provide consumers with convenient access to our carbonated
beverage appliances and consumables; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
enhance our ability to add innovative beverage and hydration
solutions to our line of water dispensers.
|
54
Industry
Overview
We believe there are several trends that support consumer demand
for our water bottle exchange service, refill vending service
and water dispensers including the following:
Emphasis on Health and Wellness. As part of a desire
to live a healthier lifestyle, we believe consumers are
increasingly focused on drinking greater quantities of water.
Concerns Regarding Quality of Municipal Tap
Water. Many consumers purchase bottled water because of
concerns regarding municipal tap water quality. Municipal water
is typically surface water that is treated centrally and pumped
to homes, which can allow contaminants to dissolve into the
water through municipal or household pipes impacting taste and
quality.
Growing Preference for Bottled Water. We believe
consumer preference toward bottled water relative to tap water
continues to grow as bottled water has become accepted on a
mainstream basis. According to an April 2010 report by
independent market analyst Datamonitor, Bottled Water in the
United States, the U.S. bottled water market generated
revenues of $17.1 billion in 2009.
Increasing Demand for Products with Lower Environmental
Impact. We believe that consumers are increasingly
favoring products with a lower environmental impact with a
reuse, recycle, reduce mindset becoming a common
driver of consumer behavior. Most single-serve polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) water bottles are produced using
fossil fuels and contribute to landfill waste given that only
28% of PET bottles are recycled according to a November 2010
Environmental Protection Agency report. Governmental legislation
also reflects these concerns with the passage of bottle
bills in many jurisdictions that tax the purchase of
plastic water bottles, require deposits with the purchase of
certain plastic bottles, prohibit the use of government funds to
purchase plastic water bottles and ban certain plastic bottles
from landfills.
Availability of an Economical Water Bottle Exchange Service,
Refill Vending Service and Innovative Water
Dispensers. Based on estimates derived from industry
data, we believe the current household penetration rate of
multi-gallon water dispensers is approximately 4% in the United
States, with the vast majority of these households utilizing
traditional home delivery services. We believe the lack of
innovation, design enhancement and functionality and the retail
pricing structure of our competitors dispenser models have
prevented greater household adoption. Compounding these issues,
we believe there previously were no economical water bottle
exchange and refill vending services with major retailer
relationships throughout the United States and Canada to promote
dispenser usage beyond the traditional home delivery model. We
believe our water bottle exchange and refill vending services
provide this alternative and we believe we are currently the
only provider delivering single-vendor solutions to retailers
throughout United States and Canada. We believe there are over
200,000 major retail locations throughout the United States and
Canada that we can target to sell our dispensers or offer our
bottled water services.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe that Primos competitive strengths include the
following:
Appeal to
Consumer Preferences
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Awareness. Both our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services incorporate the reuse of
existing bottles, recycle water bottles when their lifecycle is
complete and reduce landfill waste and fossil fuel usage
compared to alternative methods of bottled water consumption.
|
|
|
Value. We provide consumers the opportunity for cost
savings when consuming our bottled water compared to both
single-serve bottled water and typical home and office delivery
services. Our water dispensers are sold at attractive retail
prices in order to enhance consumer awareness and adoption of
our water bottle exchange and refill vending services, increase
household penetration and drive sales of our purified and
filtered water.
|
|
|
Convenience. Our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services and water dispensers are available at major
retail locations in the United States and Canada. In addition,
our water bottle exchange and refill vending services provide
consumers the convenience of either exchanging empty bottles and
purchasing full bottles or refilling the empty bottles at any
participating retailer.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Taste. We have dedicated significant time and effort
to develop our water purification process and formulate the
proprietary blend of mineral ingredients included in our Primo
purified water offered through our water bottle exchange
service. We believe that Primo purified water has a silky smooth
taste profile.
|
|
|
Health and Wellness. As part of a desire to live a
healthier lifestyle, we believe that consumers are increasingly
focused on drinking more water relative to consumption of other
beverages. As we raise our brand awareness, we believe consumers
will recognize that our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services are an effective option for their water consumption
needs.
|
Key
Retail Relationships Served by Single-Vendor
Solutions.
We believe we are the only provider of water bottle exchange and
refill vending services with single-vendor solutions for
retailers in the United States and Canada. Our direct sales
force actively pursues headquarters-based retail relationships
to better serve our retail customers and to minimize layers of
approval and decision-making with regard to the addition of new
retail locations. Our bottlers and distributors utilize our MIS
tools and processes to optimize their production and
distribution assets while servicing our retail customers. We
believe the combination of our major retail relationships,
unique single-vendor solutions for retail customers, bottling
and distribution network and our MIS tools is difficult to
replicate. We anticipate these factors will facilitate our
introduction of new water-related products in the future.
Ability
to Attract and Retain Consumers.
We offer razor-razorblade products designed to
generate recurring demand for Primo bottled water (the
razorblade) through the initial sale of our innovative water
dispensers (the razor), which include a coupon for a free three-
or five-gallon bottle of Primo purified water. We acquire new
consumers and enhance recycling efforts by accepting most
dispenser-compatible water bottles in exchange for a recycle
ticket discount toward the purchase of a full bottle of Primo
purified water. In addition, we believe our offering
high-quality water dispensers enhances consumer awareness and
adoption of our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services, increases household penetration and drives sales of
our water.
Efficient
Business Model.
Our business model allows us to efficiently offer our solutions
to our retail partners and centrally manage our bottling and
distribution network without a substantial capital investment.
We believe our business processes and MIS tools enable us to
manage the bottling and distribution of our water, servicing of
our refill locations, our product quality, retailer inventory
levels and the return of used bottles on a centralized basis,
leveraging our invested capital and personnel.
Benefit
from Managements Proven Track Record.
We benefit greatly from management experience gained over the
last 15 years in exchange businesses to implement and
refine best practices and develop and maintain key business
relationships. In addition to our Chief Executive Officer, our
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Operations,
Vice President of Products and Vice President of National
Accounts all held comparable positions within the Blue Rhino
organization during its rapid sales and location growth. We
believe this experience combined with our single-vendor
solutions contributed to Walmarts decision to name Primo
category manager for water bottle exchange and dispensers.
Our
Growth Strategy
We seek to increase our market share and drive further growth in
our business by pursuing the following strategies:
Increase
Penetration with Existing Retail Relationships and Develop New
Retail Relationships.
We believe we have significant opportunities to increase store
penetration with our existing retail relationships. As of
March 31, 2011, our water bottle exchange service and our
refill vending service were offered at a combined total of
11,500 of our top ten retailers locations. If we were to
offer both our water bottle exchange service and our
56
refill vending service at each of our top ten retailers
approximate 20,200 individual locations, these top ten retailers
would provide us with a combined total of approximately 40,400
locations to provide our services. As a result, these top ten
retailers present us an opportunity to add either our water
bottle exchange service or our refill vending service at a
combined total of approximately 28,900 additional locations.
There is minimal overlap where our water bottle exchange and
refill vending services are both currently offered. We intend to
further penetrate our other existing retail customers with our
supplementary hydration solutions, which collectively provide us
the opportunity to be present in more than a combined total
50,000 additional water bottle exchange or refill vending
locations.
Our long-term strategy includes increasing our locations to
40,000 to 50,000 retail store locations (which includes new
locations with our existing retail customers) within our primary
retail categories of home centers, hardware stores, mass
merchants, membership warehouses, grocery stores, drug stores
and discount general merchandise stores for our water bottle
exchange service or our refill vending service. We believe that
the introduction of additional hydration solutions to our
product portfolio will allow us to cross-sell products to our
existing and newly-acquired retail customers.
Drive
Consumer Adoption Through Innovative Water Dispenser
Models.
We intend to continue to develop and sell innovative water
dispensers at attractive retail prices, which we believe is
critical to increasing consumer awareness and driving consumer
adoption of our water services. We believe the current household
penetration rate of multi-gallon water dispensers is
approximately 4% in the United States. Our long-term strategy is
to provide multiple water-based beverages from a single Primo
water dispenser, which we believe will lead to greater household
penetration, with consistent promotion of our water bottle
exchange and refill vending services to supply the water. At
December 31, 2010, we offered our water dispensers at
approximately 5,500 locations in the United States, including
Walmart, Target, Kmart, Sams Club, Costco, and Lowes Home
Improvement.
Increase
Same Store Sales.
We sell our water dispensers at minimal margin and provide a
coupon for a free three- or five-gallon bottle of water with the
sale of various water dispensers at certain retailers to drive
consumer demand for our water bottle exchange and refill vending
services. We believe increasing unit sales of Primo water is
dependent on generating greater consumer awareness of the
environmentally friendly and economical aspects of and the
convenience associated with our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services. We expect that our branding, cross-promotion
marketing and sales efforts will result in greater usage of our
water bottle exchange and refill vending services.
Develop
and Install Other Hydration Solutions.
We believe we have significant opportunities to leverage our
bottling and distribution network and our systems and processes
to offer other environmentally friendly, economical, convenient
and healthy hydration solutions to our retail partners without
significant increases in our centralized costs.
Pursue
Strategic Acquisitions to Augment Geographic and Retail
Relationships.
In addition to our recent acquisitions of the Refill Business,
the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business and the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business, we believe opportunities exist
to expand through selective acquisitions, including smaller
water bottle exchange businesses with established retail
accounts, other on-premises self-service water refill vending
machine networks and retail accounts, ice dispenser machine
networks and retail accounts and water dispenser or other
beverage-related appliance companies.
Product
Overview
Water. We have dedicated significant time and effort
in developing our water purification process and formulating the
proprietary blend of mineral ingredients included in the
purified bottled water offered through our water bottle exchange
service. Our proprietary blend of mineral ingredients was
developed with the assistance of consultants and several months
of lab work and taste tests and has what we believe to be a
silky smooth taste profile. To ensure that our safety standards
are met and FDA and industry standards are met or exceeded, each
production lot
57
of our purified water undergoes chemical and microbiological
testing by the bottler and all facilities bottling Primo
purified water undergo regular hygiene audits by a third party
hired by us. Our refill vending service consists of a reverse
osmosis water filtration system that provides filtered drinking
water, which is periodically tested for quality. All state or
industry standards related to our purified or filtered water are
met or exceeded.
Water Bottles. We currently source three- and
five-gallon water bottles from multiple independent vendors for
use in our exchange service. Each of our Primo water bottles
includes a handle designed for easy transportation and lifting
when installing the bottle onto or into one of our water
dispensers. Our bottles also include a specially designed cap
that prevents spills when carrying or installing. We source the
empty reusable one-, three- and five-gallon bottles that
typically accompany our refill vending machines from several
manufacturers.
Water Dispensers. We currently source and market
four lines of water dispensers comprised of 22 models. Our
dispensers are designed to dispense Primo and other
dispenser-compatible bottled water. Our dispensers have
manufacturer suggested retail prices that range from $199.99 for
our
top-of-the-line
bottom-loading model with a stainless steel finish to $9.99 for
a simple pump that can be installed on a bottle and operated by
hand. Currently, more than 95% of our dispenser sales are
attributable to our bottom- and top-loading products. Consistent
with our environmental focus, our electric dispensers are Energy
Star®
rated, and, we believe, utilize less energy than competing water
dispensers without this industry rating.
Currently, all of our water dispensers are manufactured by
independent suppliers in China. Our dispensers are shipped
directly to our retailer partners and we do not use distributors
in connection with our water dispensers.
Primo
Water Marketing
Our marketing efforts focus primarily on developing and
maintaining a brand identity synonymous with an environmentally
friendly, economical, convenient and healthy solution for
bottled water consumption. We direct our marketing efforts as
close as possible to the point of sale to strengthen our brand
and promote consumer awareness of our water bottle exchange and
refill vending services. We believe our water bottle exchange
service promotes consumer loyalty through the use of our
recycling tickets, while our refill vending service promotes
consumer loyalty through attractive pricing. Our marketing
efforts include the following initiatives: (i) prominent
display of our Primo logo and distinctive four-bubble design on
water bottles, sales and recycling displays and water
dispensers; (ii) highly visible sales and recycling center
displays; and (iii) regular cross marketing promotions.
The Primo
Supply Chain
Water
Purification and Bottling for Our Water Bottle Exchange
Service
For our water bottle exchange service, our independent bottlers
are responsible for the water purification and bottling process
and use their own equipment to complete this process. Our
bottling process begins with either spring water or water from a
public source that is processed through a pre-filtration stage
to remove large particles. The water is then passed through
polishing filters to catch smaller particles followed by a
carbon filtration process that removes odors, tastes,
sanitization by-products and pharmaceutical chemicals. A
microfiltration process then removes microbes before the water
is passed through a softener to increase the purification
efficiency. The water next passes through the last phase of
reverse osmosis or distillation, completing the purification
process. After the purification process is complete, our
proprietary blend of mineral ingredients is injected into the
water followed by the final ozonation process to sanitize the
water. Each of our production lots is placed on a
48-hour hold
to allow for testing by the bottler and to ensure successful
compliance with chemical and microbiological standards. We have
the ability to trace each bottle of Primo purified water to its
bottling and distributor sources, and we regularly perform
recall tests to ensure our ability to react to a contamination
event should it occur.
Our distributors are responsible for collecting empty Primo
bottles and other dispenser-compatible bottles that are
deposited into our recycling center displays. At the completion
of the delivery cycle, a distributor inspects the exchanged
bottles for reusability and coordinates the recycling efforts
with our operations personnel to ensure that reuse of each water
bottle we receive in the exchange process is being optimized.
Our water bottles can be sanitized and reused up to 40 times
before being taken out of use, crushed and recycled,
substantially reducing landfill waste compared to consumption of
similar amounts of single-serve PET bottled water. Bottles that
pass a distributors
58
initial inspection are subject to three washing cycles to remove
particles. Bottles are then passed through two sanitization
stages before a final rinse with hyper-ozonated water to kill or
inactivate any microbes that remain at that point in the
sanitization process. The water bottles are then ready to be
filled with our purified water.
Reverse
Osmosis Water Filtration Systems for Our Refill Vending
Service
The reverse osmosis water filtration systems used in our refill
vending service are placed under services agreements with retail
customers who pay fees based on the number of gallons of water
used or dispensed by the system. Under this program we own the
water filtration system and contract with our distributors for
the provision of all required service and maintenance. Water
meters are generally read monthly by our distributors and an
invoice is subsequently delivered to the retailer.
The reverse osmosis water filtration system is comprised of two
components: reverse osmosis water filtration equipment and a
refill vending machine. The water filtration equipment is
typically installed in the back room of a retail location and
all such equipment generally has the same component filters and
parts. A water line is installed from the water filtration
equipment to the refill vending machine. The retail customer
specifies the location of the refill vending machine, which is
typically in the water aisle or back wall of the store. The
retail customer is responsible for the plumbing, electrical and
drainage requirements of an installation.
The regular maintenance completed by our distributors generally
includes a monthly sanitization of the reverse osmosis water
filtration system, a monthly system component check and any
necessary preventative maintenance resulting from such component
check and may include a water test for regulatory purposes. The
various jurisdictions in which we operate have specific
bimonthly, monthly, quarterly or annual water testing reporting
requirements with which our distributors must comply, although
they perform water tests on each reverse osmosis water
filtration system at least quarterly.
We employ an operations team which assembles, refurbishes and
repairs the refill vending machines. This team routinely
refurbishes equipment that has been in service for several years
or when a customer requests a refreshed system. The operations
team also procures new filtration system component parts and
assembles the units and ships them to locations for installation
by our distributors. The component parts are generally sourced
from multiple suppliers.
Distribution
Network
We rely on our bottling and distribution network to deliver our
solutions to retailers. Our water bottle exchange process begins
when a distributor is directed through our proprietary MIS tool,
PrimoLink, to stock or replenish a water bottle exchange retail
location. PrimoLink enables our distributors to review delivery
quantities and tentative scheduling requirements in their
territory. Our systems provide anticipated demand based on
historical sales and, to the extent available, retailer point of
sale (POS) data. Each distributor is provided
information to enable the distributor to load a truck with the
appropriate inventory to stock or restock the water bottle
exchange sales displays on its route, including a tailored
amount of excess bottles as safety stock. Upon arrival at each
retail location, the driver first visits the recycling center
display to collect empty Primo and other dispenser-compatible
bottles. The driver enters data related to empty bottles on a
handheld device to collect exchange efficiency information and
potential customer conversion data and then loads empty bottles
onto the truck. The driver next checks the in-store sales
display to compare the number of remaining bottles of water with
the anticipated demand report generated by our MIS tools. After
entering current stock levels, the driver is instructed by our
MIS tools through the handheld device and based on proprietary
algorithms, to replenish the sales display with an appropriate
quantity of bottles.
At the completion of the delivery cycle and after inspection of
the bottles, our distributors typically are responsible for
coordinating the sanitization and bottling process with our
bottlers. In addition, distributors must run
end-of-day
reports on their handheld devices which transmit crucial data
points into our databases and validate daily activity. Our
handheld devices also capture electronic signatures,
significantly reducing paper exchange. This greatly improves our
verification procedures and enhances our environmental efforts.
We have the ability to test and refine procedures through our
Company-operated distribution system before implementing them
with our independent distributors nationwide. In addition, we
regularly solicit feedback from our independent distributors to
improve processes.
59
Our refill vending process begins when a distributor is directed
through a proprietary dispatching MIS tool to schedule meter
readings, quality testing, preventative maintenance and repairs.
Our systems allow the distributor to see the previous meter read
or previously performed preventative maintenance. The
distributors are responsible for the initial installation of the
reverse osmosis water filtration systems, the regular
maintenance of the systems, any necessary repairs, routine water
testing and monthly meter reading to determine retail customer
water usage.
Flow of
Payments and Capital Requirements
We control the flow of payments with our retail customers and
with our bottlers and distributors through electronic data
interchange. Depending on the retailer, our distributors either
present the store manager with an invoice for the bottles
delivered or meter reading or our systems electronically bill
the retailer. We believe our exchange service provides
five-gallon bottles of purified water that typically cost a
consumer between $5.99 and $6.99, after giving effect to the
discount provided by our recycling ticket, while our refill
vending service typically costs a consumer between $0.25 and
$0.50 per gallon, depending upon the location and the
retailers overall pricing strategy.
We compensate our distributors with a fixed payment per
delivered water bottle or a commission based upon a percentage
of total revenues at the locations for which the distributor is
responsible, subject to minimum and maximum amounts. Payments
are typically made between the tenth and fifteenth day of the
month following the delivery or service activity. Our fixed
payment for deliveries in our water bottle exchange service is a
gross amount from which the distributor must typically pay the
bottler. Due to the high degree of automation during our billing
and inventory management procedures, we are able to leverage our
centralized personnel and believe we will be able to
significantly expand our business with minimal increases in
variable costs.
We focus our capital expenditures on developing new retail
relationships, installing new store locations, raising brand
awareness, research and development for new products and
maintaining our MIS tools. We are also responsible for the
centralized operations and personnel, sales and recycling
displays, bottles, transportation racks, mineral packets and
mineral injectors, reverse osmosis equipment and parts, vending
displays and handheld devices. Our bottling and distribution
network typically has made the capital investment required to
operate our services, including a majority of the capital
expenditures related to the bottling, sanitization and refill
process and the distribution assets such as delivery trucks and
warehouse storage. Participation in our water bottle exchange or
refill vending service does not typically require the
independent bottlers and distributors to make substantial new
investments because they often are able to augment their current
production capacity and leverage their existing bottling and
distribution assets. In addition, many of our major retail
customers have invested their capital to expand store locations
and generate customer traffic.
Retailer
Relationships
We target major retailers with either a national footprint or a
significant regional concentration. Our relationships are
diversified among the following retail categories and major
accounts:
|
|
|
Retail Category
|
|
Major Accounts
|
|
Home Centers / Hardware Stores
|
|
Lowes Home Improvement, Ace Hardware, True Value
|
Mass Merchants
|
|
Walmart, Target, Kmart
|
Grocery Stores
|
|
Kroger, Albertsons, Food Lion, Safeway, Sobeys, Winn-Dixie,
H-E-B Grocery
|
Membership Warehouses
|
|
Sams Club, Costco
|
Drug Stores
|
|
Walgreens, CVS
|
Office Retail
|
|
Office Depot, Staples
|
Retailer Opportunity.
We offer retailers single-vendor solutions. Our services provide
retailers with a year-round consumer product and an opportunity
to increase sales and profits with minimal labor and financial
investment. Through our bottling and distribution network, we
are able to service major retailers nationwide and in Canada.
Retailers benefit from our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services that offer high margin and generate
productivity from often underutilized interior and exterior
retail space. In addition, these services have the potential to
increase retailers
60
sales of ancillary products through increased traffic from
repeat water consumers, who we believe purchase an average of 35
multi-gallon water bottles annually.
Account
Set-Up.
We actively pursue headquarters-based retail relationships to
better serve our retail partners and minimize layers of approval
and decision-making with regard to the roll-out of our water
services to multiple locations. Upon confirmation of new retail
locations, we coordinate with the retailer and distributor to
schedule openings in a timely manner. We actively assist
retailers in developing site plans for the setup of our sales
and recycling center displays and reverse osmosis water
filtration systems. While retailer setup preferences may vary,
retailers often like to locate the recycling center display
prominently on the exterior of their store to ease the
transaction process, showcase their recycling and environmental
efforts and conserve inside floor space while at the same time
promoting the Primo brand.
Account Service.
Our water bottle exchange and refill vending services are
turn-key programs for retailers in which we and our distributors
actively service each retail account. After the retail location
is established, our distributors complete
on-site
training and have an economic interest in supporting and growing
the business relationship to increase product throughput.
Sales Support.
While distributors service our retail accounts, the customer
relationship is owned and maintained by our
experienced retail sales organization, which allows us to
develop strong brand affinity and maintain key
headquarters-based relationships to secure and maintain our
retail network. Our retail relationships are divided into
regions and managed by our sales personnel. In addition, we
leverage our independent distributors who typically employ their
own sales representatives. This combined team is responsible for
selling and supporting our water bottle exchange and refill
vending services to targeted retailers.
Significant Customers.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, Lowes Home
Improvement and Walmart represented approximately 37% and 21% of
our consolidated net sales, respectively.
Bottler
and Distributor Network
Bottler and Distributor Opportunity. We provide
independent bottlers and distributors with an attractive
business expansion opportunity, complementing many of their
existing operations. We continually pursue new relationships and
additional locations with existing retail partners to increase
the production at each bottlers manufacturing facility and
the retail customer density within each distributors
territory.
Water Bottle Exchange Service Bottler and Distributor
Standards. We work closely with our bottling and
distribution network to ensure their production, storage and
service standards meet or exceed the requirements of the FDA and
other industry regulations. As we seek to promote our brand, we
believe it is critical to provide bottled water that has
consistent taste and is produced in a manner that exceeds
current industry requirements. We regularly monitor, test and
arrange for third-party hygiene audits of each bottling facility.
In addition, we regularly monitor our distributors
performance to ensure a high level of account service.
Distributors of our water bottle exchange service are generally
required to develop an infrastructure sufficient to:
|
|
|
|
|
complete customer installations within 30 days of the
notification of a newly established account;
|
|
|
monitor and maintain inventory levels with assigned retail
accounts; and
|
|
|
resolve water bottle stock-outs within 36 hours.
|
Bottler and Distributor Selection Process.
We have selectively identified and pursued high quality
independent bottlers and distributors that can support our major
retailers nationwide and in Canada. We screen independent
bottler and distributor candidates by reviewing credit reports,
safety records and manufacturing compliance reports, and
conducting management reference checks.
61
As a result of this thorough selection process, we have
established what we believe to be highly dependable
relationships with our independent bottlers and distributors. We
believe we have a positive relationship with each of these
parties and our senior executives have maintained a business
relationship with many of our key distributors since they were
managing operations at Blue Rhino Corporation.
Bottler and Distributor Services.
We currently employ raw material procurement and supply chain
personnel who perform periodic inventory audits and month-end
review procedures. In addition we have operations personnel who
manage our independent bottler and distributor relationships,
including training and monitoring personnel. We also employ
customer service personnel who handle bottler, distributor,
retailer and end-user phone calls.
Company Owned Distribution Operations.
We currently own and operate two distribution operations that
have distribution responsibilities for certain regions that are
relatively near our primary facilities. We distribute our
bottled water for our exchange service to major retailers in
portions of North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida and
Virginia. We believe distributing our bottled water in these
areas is an important way for us to better understand the
bottled water exchange process and provides us the necessary
feedback to enhance our independent bottler and distributor
relationships. In addition, distributing our bottled water in
these areas should assist us in validating the economic
arrangements we offer our bottlers and distributors and
developing industry knowledge that we can deploy throughout our
system.
Independent Bottler and Distributor Agreements.
With respect to our water bottle exchange service we have
entered into bottler and distributor agreements with each of our
independent bottlers and distributors on substantially similar
terms. While individual agreements contain variances and
exceptions, the material terms of such agreements are described
generally below. No individual bottler or distributor is
material to our overall financial condition or results of
operations.
Independent Bottler Agreement.
In our independent bottler agreement for the water bottle
exchange service, we appoint a bottler as a non-exclusive
supplier of our purified drinking water. The bottler is
restricted from competing with us during the term of the
agreement and for a specified period after the term in a
specified geography.
The bottler is required to bottle and deliver product in
conformance with our specifications, including our proprietary
mineral formula. The bottler must ensure that our bottled water
products comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations
(including those of the FDA), industry standards (including
those of the International Bottled Water Association) and our
quality requirements. The agreement also imposes requirements on
the bottler with respect to the maintenance of its facilities
and equipment that are intended to ensure the quality of our
products.
We provide the necessary bottles, caps, labels, transportation
racks, mineral injectors and formula minerals at no charge to
the bottler to support the bottling and supply of our bottled
water products. The bottler is required to maintain inventory
levels necessary to satisfy our production requirements. Product
may not be released for shipment until the bottler meets all
applicable quality requirements.
Pricing is set forth in the agreement, and we have the right to
modify pricing on thirty days notice to the bottler. The
agreements generally have a three-year term, and if not
otherwise terminated, automatically renew for successive
one-year periods after the initial term. Either party may
terminate the agreement in the event of an uncured material
breach by the other party.
Water Bottle Exchange Distribution Agreement.
In our independent distributor agreement for the water bottle
exchange service, we grant a distributor the right to serve as
our exclusive delivery and service agent and representative with
respect to our bottled water exchange service for a specified
term in a specified geographic territory. Many of our
independent distributors are also responsible for performing or
outsourcing the performance of the bottling function in their
specified geographic territory. The distributor is restricted
from competing with us during the term of the agreement and for
a specified period after the term in the specified geography. We
have the right, at any time, to purchase a distributors
rights
62
under the agreement, along with related distribution equipment,
for an amount based on the distributors revenues under the
agreement for the prior twelve-month period and the fair market
value of the equipment being purchased.
The distributor must perform its services under the agreement in
conformance with our distributor manual and all applicable laws
and regulations, including those of the FDA.
We compensate a distributor for its services while maintaining a
direct relationship with and collecting payments from our
retailer customers within the distributors service
territory. Pricing is set forth in the agreement, and we have
the right to modify pricing and payment terms on thirty days
notice to the distributor.
The agreements generally have a ten-year term, and if not
otherwise terminated, automatically renew for successive
one-year terms after the initial ten-year term. Either party may
terminate the agreement for, among other reasons, an uncured
material breach by the other party.
Refill Standards.
We work closely with distributors of our refill vending services
to ensure operation and sanitation standards meet or exceed the
requirements of state regulations, NAMA standards and other
industry standards. As we seek to promote our brand, we believe
it is critical to provide filtered drinking water that is
produced in a manner that exceeds current industry requirements.
We regularly monitor, test and arrange for third-party hygiene
testing of production and dispenser units.
In addition, we regularly monitor our distributors
performance to ensure a high level of account service. Our
distributors are generally required to develop an infrastructure
sufficient to:
|
|
|
|
|
complete customer installations within 30 days of the
notification of a newly established account;
|
|
|
monitor and maintain production and dispenser operation and
quality; and
|
|
|
resolve production unit and dispenser failures within
36 hours.
|
Refill Vending Services Agreements.
Our distributors of refill vending services are responsible for
the initial installation of the reverse osmosis water filtration
systems, the regular maintenance of the systems, any necessary
repairs, routine water testing and monthly meter reading to
determine retail customer water usage. The distributors are
comprised of Culligan International franchised dealers,
distributors owned by subsidiaries of Culligan International and
third-party distributors.
Management
Information Systems
We have made a substantial investment in MIS tools which enhance
our ability to process orders, manage inventory and accounts
receivable, maintain distributor and customer information,
maintain cost-efficient operations and assist distributors in
delivering products and services on a timely basis. Our
technology utilizes highly integrated, scalable software
applications that cost-effectively support our growing retail
network. Our MIS tools also allow us to analyze historical
trends and data to further enhance the execution, service and
identification of new markets and marketing opportunities. The
primary components of our systems include the following:
Sales and Marketing Support Systems.
We operate a single customer relationship management database
that integrates all financial and transaction-based data with
respect to each retail account. Our MIS tools provide our
account managers and customer service representatives access to
crucial data to effectively manage each bottler, distributor and
retail relationship.
Bottler and Distributor Level Technology.
Our distribution process is highly automated and scalable. Our
technology allows bottlers and distributors timely access to
information for customer support needs and provides access to
real-time data to enhance decisions. In addition, each
distributor is electronically linked to our systems with our
proprietary PrimoLink software. PrimoLink enables distributors
to review delivery quantities and tentative scheduling
requirements across our entire bottling and distribution
network. In addition, our MIS tools allow drivers to update
delivery, inventory and invoicing information through handheld
devices. This technology provides retailers with accurate and
timely inventory and invoices and assists each distributor in
managing its responsibilities.
63
Financial Integration.
We utilize Microsofts Dynamics GP software as our core
platform which interfaces with all of our systems. Each handheld
device is based on Microsofts operating system and ensures
integration within our reporting and financial databases. All
delivery transactions are validated and data is imported into
our database tables and mapped to corresponding accounting
ledgers. We anticipate completing the integration of the Refill
Business into our financial systems in the second quarter of
2011.
Manufacturing
and Sourcing
Our manufacturing strategy is to utilize independent
manufacturers to produce empty water bottles, sales displays and
recycle centers and water dispensers at a reasonable cost. We
believe that using independent manufacturers has several
advantages over our manufacturing these items directly,
including (i) decreased capital investment in manufacturing
plants and equipment and working capital, (ii) the ability
to leverage independent manufacturers purchasing
relationships for lower materials costs, (iii) minimal
fixed costs of maintaining unused manufacturing capacity and
(iv) the ability to utilize our suppliers broad
technical and process expertise.
Currently, the majority of our water dispensers are assembled by
independent manufacturers in China. These manufacturers utilize
several
sub-suppliers
to provide components and subassemblies. Each unit is inspected
and tested for quality prior to shipment and any units returned
by consumers or retailers are sent directly to the manufacturer
for a credit, replacement or refund issued by the manufacturer.
Our units generally are shipped directly from Hong Kong to the
retailer.
We employ an operations team which assembles, refurbishes and
repairs the refill vending machines. This team is located at our
Eagan, Minnesota facility, where it routinely refurbishes
equipment that has been in service for several years or when a
customer requests a refreshed system. The operations team also
procures new filtration systems component parts and assembles
the units and ships them to locations for installation by
distributors. The component parts are generally sourced from
multiple suppliers.
Our water bottles and caps are produced by multiple independent
vendors throughout the United States. We select suppliers based
on price, quality and geographic proximity to our bottlers. We
only purchase water bottles with handles as a convenience
feature for consumers.
Our sales displays and recycle centers are made to our design.
We frequently request bids from multiple independent
manufacturers to achieve optimal pricing.
Product
Design and Development
A primary focus of our product research and development efforts
is developing innovative water dispensers as part of our
strategy to enhance consumer awareness and adoption of our
bottled water services, increase household penetration and drive
sales of our bottled water. We continually work to improve water
dispenser features, seek to lower manufacturing costs so that
our innovative products are more affordable and introduce new
models. Innovative improvements developed in cooperation with
our manufacturing partners include bottom-loading dispensers,
adjustable hot and cold temperature controls and faster water
dispensing capabilities. Our water dispenser models are designed
to appeal to consumers of diverse demographic audiences.
We introduced a new water dispenser product line in the fourth
quarter of 2010. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we plan to ship
the first model in our 3rd dimension line, which will
include a 12-cup drip coffee maker. With our purchase of the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business, we expect to introduce
an appliance that dispenses single-serve cold carbonated
beverages is the fourth quarter of 2011. In addition, we are
developing a water dispenser product that provides consumers the
ability to dispense multiple purified water-based beverages,
including traditional coffee and single-serve cold carbonated
beverages.
Competition
We participate in the highly competitive bottled water segment
of the nonalcoholic beverage industry. While the industry is
dominated by large and well-known international companies,
numerous smaller firms are also seeking to
64
establish market niches. We believe we have a unique business
model in the bottled water market in the United States in that
we not only offer multi-gallon bottled water on a nationwide
basis but also provide consumers the ability to exchange their
used containers as part of our water bottle exchange service or
refill their used containers as part of our refill vending
service. We believe that we are one of the first companies to
provide a national water bottle exchange service at retail.
While we are aware of a few direct competitors that operate
similar exchange networks, we believe they operate on a much
smaller scale than we do and do not have equivalent MIS tools or
bottler and distributor capabilities to effectively support
major retailers nationwide. Competitive factors with respect to
our business include pricing, taste, advertising, sales
promotion programs, product innovation, efficient production and
distribution techniques, introduction of new packaging, and
brand and trademark development and protection.
Our primary competitors in our bottled water business include
Nestlé, The
Coca-Cola
Company, PepsiCo, Dr Pepper Snapple Group and DS Waters of
America. While none of these companies currently offers a
nationwide water bottle exchange service at retail, Nestlé
and DS Waters of America offer this service on a regional basis.
However, many of these competitors are leading consumer products
companies, have substantially greater financial and other
resources than we do, have established a strong brand presence
with consumers and have established relationships with
retailers, manufacturers, bottlers and distributors necessary to
start an exchange business at retail locations nationwide should
they decide to do so.
Our business model for the refill vending service is
differentiated from most of the participants in the North
American nonalcoholic beverage industry in that it offers
self-service refill of drinking water. There are a few direct
competitors that offer similar refill vending services, but with
the exception of Glacier Water Services, Inc., we believe these
direct competitors generally operate on a smaller geographical
and operational scale than our refill vending service. Our
refill vending service faces two levels of competition:
(i) competition at the retail customer level to secure
placement of its reverse osmosis water filtration systems in the
store; and (ii) competition at an end-user level to
convince consumers to purchase its water versus other options.
Competitive factors with respect to our refill vending service
include pricing, taste, advertising, sales promotion programs,
retail placement, introduction of new packaging and branding. In
addition to competition between firms within the bottled water
industry, the industry itself faces significant competition from
other non-alcoholic beverages, including carbonated and
non-carbonated soft drinks and waters, juices, sport and energy
drinks, coffees, teas and spring and tap water.
We also compete directly and indirectly in the water dispenser
marketplace. This marketplace is diverse and faces competition
from other methods of purified water consumption such as
countertop filtration systems, faucet mounted filtration
systems, in-line whole-house filtration systems, water
filtration dispensing products such as pitchers and jugs,
standard and advanced feature water coolers and
refrigerator-dispensed filtered and unfiltered water.
Intellectual
Property and Trademarks
We believe that our intellectual property provides a competitive
advantage and we have invested substantial time, effort and
capital in establishing and protecting our intellectual property
rights. We have filed certain patent applications and trademark
registration applications and intend to seek additional patents,
to develop additional trademarks and seek federal registrations
for such trademarks and to develop other intellectual property.
We consider our Primo name and related trademarks and our other
intellectual property to be valuable to our business and the
establishment of a national branded bottled water exchange
service. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright,
trademark and trade secret laws and other arrangements to
protect our proprietary rights. We own ten United States federal
trademark registrations, including registrations for our
Primo®
and Taste
Perfection®
trademarks, our
Primo®
logo and our distinctive four bubble design. U.S. federal
trademark registrations generally have a perpetual duration if
they are properly maintained and renewed. We also own a pending
application to register our Zero Waste. Perfect
Tastetm
trademark in the United States and Canada for use in association
with drinking water dispensers, bottled drinking water and a
variety of other non-alcoholic beverages. In addition, the
design of our recycling center displays is protected by four
United States design patents and two Canadian industrial design
registrations. The United States design patents expire between
May 2021 and April 2022 and, assuming that certain required fees
are paid, the Canadian industrial design registrations expire in
May 2017.
65
In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets
and other non-patented proprietary information relating to our
product development, business processes and operating
activities. We regard portions of our proprietary MIS tools,
various algorithms used in our business and the composition of
our mineral formula to be valuable trade secrets of the Company.
We seek to protect this information through appropriate efforts
to maintain its secrecy, including confidentiality agreements.
Governmental
Regulation
The conduct of our businesses and the production, distribution,
advertising, promotion, labeling, safety, transportation, sale
and use of our products are subject to various laws and
regulations administered by federal, state, provincial and local
governmental agencies in the United States and Canada. It is our
policy to abide by the laws and regulations that apply to us,
and we require our bottling, manufacturing, and distributing
partners to comply with all laws and regulations applicable to
them. We are required to comply with:
|
|
|
|
|
federal laws, such as the FDCA, the Occupational Safety and
Health Act and the Canadian Food and Drugs Act;
|
|
|
customs and foreign trade laws and regulations;
|
|
|
state consumer protection laws;
|
|
|
federal, state, provincial and local environmental, health and
safety laws;
|
|
|
laws governing equal employment opportunity and workplace
activities; and
|
|
|
various other federal, state, provincial and local statutes and
regulations.
|
We maintain environmental, health and safety policies and a
quality, environmental, health and safety program designed to
ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
The FDA regulates bottled water as a food under the federal
Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Similarly, Health Canada and the
CFIA regulate our products under the Canadian Food and Drugs
Act. Our bottled water must meet FDA and CFIA requirements of
safety for human consumption, identity, quality and labeling.
Further, the sale and marketing of our products is subject to
FDAs advertising and promotion requirements and
restrictions. In addition, FDA has established current
good manufacturing practice regulations, which
govern the facilities, methods, practices and controls used for
the processing, bottling and distribution of bottled drinking
water. We and our third-party supply, bottling and distribution
partners are subject to these requirements. We also must comply
with overlapping and sometimes inconsistent state and provincial
regulations in various jurisdictions. As a result, we must
expend resources to continuously monitor state and provincial
legislative and regulatory activities for purposes of
identifying and ensuring compliance with the laws and
regulations that apply to our bottled water business in each
state and province in which we operate. While we must meet the
government-mandated standards, we believe that our self-imposed
standards meet or exceed those set by federal, state, provincial
and local regulations. In addition, we voluntarily comply with
the Federal Trade Commissions Green Guides
concerning the making of environmental claims in marketing
materials.
Additionally, the manufacture, sale and use of resins used to
make water bottles is subject to regulation by the FDA. Those
regulations are concerned with substances used in food packaging
materials, not with specific finished food packaging products.
We may be subject to additional or changing requirements under
the recently enacted Federal Food Safety Modernization Act of
2011, which requires among other things, that food facilities
conduct contamination hazard analyses, implement risk-based
preventive controls and develop track and trace capabilities. We
believe our beverage containers are in compliance with FDA
regulations. Additionally, the use of polycarbonates in food
containers used by children is subject to certain state and
local restrictions.
Measures have been enacted in various localities and states that
require a deposit or tax to be charged for certain
non-refillable beverage containers. The precise requirements
imposed by these measures vary. Other deposit, recycling or
product stewardship proposals have been introduced in various
jurisdictions. We anticipate that similar legislation or
regulations may be proposed in the future at the local, state,
provincial and federal levels.
The refill vending machines used in our reverse osmosis water
filtration systems are certified by the National Automatic
Merchandising Association (NAMA). NAMA maintains a
vending machine certification program which
evaluates food and beverage vending machines against current
requirements of the U.S. Public Health Service Ordinance
and Code. The manufacturing facility used in connection with our
refill vending service is
66
required to be registered with the EPA under the provisions of
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act because
certain components used in connection with the reverse osmosis
water filtration systems are deemed to be pesticidal
devices. The Eagan, Minnesota facility has been registered
as required. Additionally, certain states have permit
requirements for the operation of the refill vending machines.
Segments
At December 31, 2010, we had four operating segments and
three reportable segments: Primo Bottled Water Exchange
(Exchange), Primo Refill (Refill) and
Primo Products (Products). However, in 2011 we began
to integrate the Exchange and Refill operations to take
advantage of synergies and to eliminate duplicate operations and
costs. In integrating the businesses we have changed our
internal management and reporting structure such that Exchange
and Refill no longer meet the requirements of operating segments
on a stand-alone basis. Beginning in 2011, we have two operating
segments and two reportable segments: Water and Products. All
previous periods have been retrospectively revised to conform to
this presentation. As we further integrate the various Water
operations we anticipate that we will have two reportable
segments in the future. See Note 11 Segments in
the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus for further
details, including additional financial information regarding
our principal products and services.
Seasonality
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience
seasonal fluctuations in our sales and operating income. Our
sales have been highest in the spring and summer, and lowest in
the fall and winter. Our Water segment, which generally enjoy
higher margins than our water dispensers, experience higher
sales in the spring and summer. We have historically experienced
higher sales in spring and summer with respect to our water
dispensers, however, we believe dispenser sales are more
dependent on retailer inventory management and purchasing cycles
and have little correlation to weather. Sustained periods of
poor weather, particularly in the spring and summer, can
negatively impact our sales with respect to our higher margin
Water segment. Accordingly, our results of operations in any
quarter will not necessarily be indicative of the results that
we may achieve for a fiscal year or any future quarter.
Employees
As of March 31, 2011, we had 125 employees. We believe that
our continued success will depend on our ability to continue to
attract and retain skilled personnel. We have never had a work
stoppage and none of our employees are represented by a labor
union. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Exchange
Act Reports
We make available free of charge through our Internet website,
www.primowater.com, our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after such materials are electronically filed with
or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The SEC maintains an Internet website,
www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information filed electronically with the
SEC. Any materials that we file with the SEC may also be read
and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room,
100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D. C.
20549. Information on the operations of the Public Reference
Room is available by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The information provided on our website is not part of this
report and is not incorporated herein by reference.
67
MANAGEMENT
Set forth below are our executive officers and directors,
together with their positions and ages as of May 26, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director
|
Jack C. Kilgore
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director
|
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
David L. Warnock
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
Set forth below is a brief description of the business
experience of our directors and executive officers.
Billy D. Prim Mr. Prim has been our Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President since he founded Primo in
2004. Prior to founding Primo, Mr. Prim founded Blue Rhino
Corporation (a provider of propane cylinder exchange and
complementary propane and non-propane products) in March 1994
and served as its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board. He led Blue Rhinos initial public offering in May
1998 and remained its Chief Executive Officer until April 2004,
when Blue Rhino was acquired by Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., at
which time he was elected to the Ferrellgas board of directors
on which he served until November 2008. Mr. Prim currently
serves on the board of directors of Towne Park Ltd. and
previously served on the board of directors of Southern
Community Bank and Trust from 1996 until 2005. Mr. Prim
brings extensive business, managerial and leadership experience
to our Board of Directors. Mr. Prims service as an
executive and a director of Primo provides our Board of
Directors with a vital understanding and appreciation of our
business. In addition, Mr. Prims leadership
abilities, his experience at Blue Rhino and his extensive
knowledge of the bottled water industry position him well for
service on our Board of Directors.
Mark Castaneda Mr. Castaneda has served as our
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer since
March 2008. Prior to joining Primo, he served as Chief Financial
Officer for Tecta America, Inc. (a private national roofing
contractor) from October 2007 until March 2008, as Chief
Financial Officer for Interact Public Safety (a private software
company) from September 2006 until October 2007 and as Chief
Financial Officer for Pike Electric Corporation (a
publicly-traded energy solutions provider) from October 2004
until August 2006, where he helped lead its initial public
offering in July 2005. Mr. Castaneda served Blue Rhino
Corporation as its Chief Financial Officer from November 1997
until October 2004 and as a Director from September 1998 until
April 2004. Mr. Castaneda helped lead Blue Rhinos
initial public offering with Mr. Prim in May 1998.
Mr. Castaneda began his career with Deloitte &
Touche in 1988 and is a certified public accountant.
Michael S. Gunter Mr. Gunter has served as our
Senior Vice President of Operations since March 2010 and
previously served as our Vice President of Operations from our
founding in October 2004 through February 2010. Prior to joining
Primo, he served as the Senior Director of Strategy and
Financial Analysis as well as the Director of Information
Technology for Blue Rhino Corporation from 2000 until October
2004. Mr. Gunter served as an Artillery Officer in the
United States Marine Corps from 1990 to 1996. Mr. Gunter
currently serves on the board of directors of Arrhythmia
Research Technology, Inc. (a medical software company).
Richard A. Brenner Mr. Brenner has been the
Chief Executive Officer of Amarr Garage Doors (a manufacturer
and distributor of garage doors) since July 2002 and was its
President from July 1993 until June 2002. Mr. Brenner also
serves on several boards of private and nonprofit entities,
including ABC of North Carolina, Idealliance and Wake Forest
University Health Sciences, and was a member of the board of
directors of Blue Rhino Corporation from 1998 to 2004.
Mr. Brenners significant executive and board service
experience qualify him for service on our Board of Directors.
Jack C. Kilgore Mr. Kilgore was elected to
our Board of Directors at the 2011 Annual Stockholders Meeting
on May 18, 2011. Since 2004, Mr. Kilgore has served as
President of the Consumer Products Division of Rich Products
Corporation (a supplier and solutions provider to the
foodservice, in-store bakery, and retail marketplaces) where he
68
oversees the companys consumer packaged goods business.
Mr. Kilgore joined Rich Products Corporation in 1978 as a
sales and marketing administrator and has advanced through the
company serving in roles as a region manager, division manager,
national sales manager and various other sales and market
leadership positions before being named President of the
Consumer Products Division. Mr. Kilgore serves on the
advisory board of South Coast Bank & Trust, is a
former chairman of the National Fisheries Institute and is
serving and has previously served in various leadership
positions for a number of
not-for-profit
entities. Mr. Kilgores extensive knowledge of and
experience in the consumer goods industry as well as his
executive and managerial experience qualify him to serve as a
member of our Board of Directors.
Malcolm McQuilkin Mr. McQuilkin is the
President of Blue Rhino Global Sourcing, LLC (an import and
design company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ferrellgas
Propane Partners) and was the Chief Executive Officer of
Uniflame, Inc. from 1990 until it was acquired by Blue Rhino
Global Sourcing, LLC in 2000. As the current President of Blue
Rhino Global Sourcing, Mr. McQuilkin provides our Board of
Directors with significant leadership and executive experience.
Mr. McQuilkins leadership abilities, his
international business expertise (particularly with respect to
outsourcing) and his extensive knowledge of complex financial
and operational issues facing large companies qualify him to
serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
David L. Warnock Mr. Warnock is a founder and
managing member of Camden Partners Holdings, LLC (a private
investment management firm established in 1995 and formerly
known as Cahill Warnock & Company, LLC).
Mr. Warnock also serves as the managing member of the
general partner of both Camden Partners Strategic Fund III,
L.P. and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock serves on the board of National American
University, Inc., New Horizons Worldwide, Inc., Nobel Learning
Communities, Inc., Questar Assessment, Inc., and The Princeton
Review, and was a member of the board of directors of Blue Rhino
Corporation from 2000 to 2004. Mr. Warnock also serves as a
member of the board of directors of several private companies
and not-for profit entities. Mr. Warnock brings to our
Board of Directors a unique and valuable perspective from his
years of experience in private investment management.
Mr. Warnocks business acumen and his financial,
managerial, leadership and board service experience qualify him
to serve on our Board of Directors.
Board of
Directors
Our amended and restated bylaws permit our Board of Directors to
establish the authorized number of directors, and five directors
are currently authorized. These amended and restated bylaws also
provide that any vacancies or newly-created directorships may be
filled only by the remaining members of our Board of Directors.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws provide for a classified board of
directors consisting of three classes of directors, each serving
staggered three-year terms, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the Class I directors are Billy D. Prim and Jack C.
Kilgore, and their terms will expire at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2014;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Class II directors are David L. Warnock and Malcolm
McQuilkin, and their terms expire at the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held in 2012; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Class III director will be Richard A. Brenner, and his
term expires at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in
2013.
|
Upon expiration of the term of a class of directors, directors
for that class will be elected for a three-year term at the
annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which that term
expires. Each directors term continues until the election
and qualification of that directors successor, or that
directors earlier death, resignation or removal. Any
increase or decrease in the number of directors will be
distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as
possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors.
This classification of our Board of Directors may have the
effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our
Company.
69
Board
Committees
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a
Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance
Committee. Each committee is currently comprised entirely of
non-employee directors. Our Board of Directors may establish
other committees from time to time to facilitate our corporate
governance.
The current members of the boards committees are
identified in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
Director
|
|
Audit
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Governance
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
Chair
|
|
|
|
Chair
|
Jack C. Kilgore
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
David L. Warnock
|
|
X
|
|
Chair
|
|
X
|
Each committee operates under a written charter adopted by the
Board of Directors. These charters are available on our
corporate website (www.primowater.com) in the
Investor Relations section under Corporate
Governance.
Audit Committee. The principal responsibilities and
functions of our Audit Committee are to assist the Board of
Directors in fulfilling its oversight of (i) the integrity
of our financial statements, (ii) the effectiveness of our
internal controls over financial reporting, (iii) our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iv) the
qualifications and independence of our registered public
accounting firm, and (v) the performance of our registered
public accounting firm. In carrying out its oversight
responsibilities and functions, our Audit Committee, among other
things, oversees and interacts with our independent auditors
regarding the auditors engagement
and/or
dismissal, duties, compensation, qualifications and performance;
reviews and discusses with our independent auditors the scope of
audits and our accounting principles, policies and practices;
reviews and discusses our audited annual financial statements
with our independent auditors and management; and reviews and
approves or ratifies (if appropriate) related party
transactions. In addition, the Audit Committee oversees
managements efforts in managing our key financial and
other risk exposures and developing our enterprise risk
management policies and procedures. Our Audit Committee met two
times in 2010.
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Warnock is
an audit committee financial expert, as defined under the
applicable rules of the SEC, and that all members of the Audit
Committee are independent within the meaning of the
applicable Nasdaq listing standards and the independence
standards of
rule 10A-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Each of the members of
the Audit Committee meets the requirements for financial
literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC
and the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Compensation Committee. The principal functions of
our Compensation Committee include (i) reviewing our
compensation practices and policies, (ii) reviewing and
approving the compensation for our senior executives,
(iii) evaluating the performance of our Chief Executive
Officer, and (iv) assisting in Primos compliance with
the regulations of the SEC regarding executive compensation
disclosure. Our Board of Directors has determined that all
members of the Compensation Committee are
independent within the meaning of the applicable
Nasdaq listing standards. Our Compensation Committee met one
time in 2010.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The principal
functions of our Nominating and Governance committee are, among
other things, to (i) establish membership criteria for our
Board of Directors, (ii) establish and communicate to
stockholders a method of recommending potential director
nominees for the Nominating and Governance Committees
consideration, (iii) identify individuals qualified to
become directors consistent with such criteria and select the
director nominees, (iv) plan for continuity on our Board of
Directors, (v) recommend action to our Board of Directors
upon any vacancies on our Board of Directors,
(vi) facilitate the annual evaluation of the performance of
our Board of Directors and its committees,
(vii) periodically review management succession plans, and
(viii) consider and recommend to our Board of Directors
other actions relating to our Board of Directors, its members
and its committees. Our Board of Directors has determined that
all members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are
independent within the meaning of the applicable
Nasdaq listing standards. Our Nominating and Governance
Committee did not meet in 2010.
70
Director
Independence
The Board of Directors determines the independence of its
members based on the standards specified by The NASDAQ Stock
Market, LLC (Nasdaq). Under the applicable Nasdaq
listing standards, independent directors must comprise a
majority of a listed companys board of directors. In
addition, Nasdaqs rules require that, subject to specific
exceptions, each member of a listed companys audit
committee and those members of the board of directors
determining executive compensation and director nominations be
independent. Audit Committee members also must satisfy the
independence criteria set forth in
rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the Nasdaq
rules, a director will only qualify as an independent
director if, in the opinion of the companys board of
directors, that person does not have a relationship that would
interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying
out the responsibilities of a director.
In order to be considered independent for purposes of
rule 10A-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a member of an audit
committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her
capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of
directors or any other board committee: (1) accept,
directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other
compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its
subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed
company or any of its subsidiaries.
Our Board of Directors has reviewed the relationships between
Primo and each director and director nominee to determine
compliance with the Nasdaq listing standards and has determined
that none of Messrs. Brenner, Kilgore, McQuilkin and
Warnock has a relationship that would interfere with the
exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors
is independent as that term is defined under Nasdaq
rules. Our Board of Directors also determined that
Messrs. Brenner, Kilgore and Warnock, who comprise our
Audit Committee, Messrs. Kilgore, McQuilkin and Warnock,
who comprise our Compensation Committee, and
Messrs. Brenner, Kilgore, McQuilkin and Warnock, who
comprise our Nominating and Governance Committee, satisfy the
independence standards for those committees established by
applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules. In making these determinations,
our Board of Directors considered the relationships that each
non-employee director has with Primo and all other facts and
circumstances our Board of Directors deemed relevant in
determining their independence, including the beneficial
ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.
There is no family relationship between any director, executive
officer or person nominated to become a director or executive
officer.
Director
Compensation
The following table shows the compensation paid to each
non-employee director who served on our Board of Directors in
2010:
2010 Director
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
David W. Dupree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
David L. Warnock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
73,817
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts shown in this column
represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards
computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718). Each
director received an award of 5,749 shares of restricted
stock in February 2010 that vests in equal annual installments
over a three-year period. This was the only stock award made to
directors during 2010. For additional information regarding the
assumptions made in calculating these amounts, see the notes to
our audited financial statements included herein.
|
71
The following table shows the number of outstanding and
unexercised stock options and the number of shares of restricted
stock held by each non-employee director as of December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Subject to
|
|
Shares of Restricted
|
|
|
Outstanding Option
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Outstanding
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
5,749
|
|
David W. Dupree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,749
|
|
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
|
10,733
|
|
|
|
5,749
|
|
David L. Warnock
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
5,749
|
|
Prior to our initial public offering, we did not have a policy
regarding compensation payable to our directors. Instead, we
from time to time made awards of stock options and restricted
stock to our non-employee directors. In connection with our
initial public offering, our Board of Directors approved and
adopted our Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy. Under the
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy, each non-employee
director receives an annual retainer of $25,000, paid one-half
in restricted common stock and one-half in options to purchase
common stock, granted on the first business day following each
annual meeting of our stockholders. Additionally, non-employee
directors receive the following cash awards:
|
|
|
|
|
a $5,000 retainer for directors who also serve as committee
chairs and a $2,500 retainer for other directors;
|
|
|
$2,500 for each regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting
attended in person ($1,000 if attended telephonically);
|
|
|
$1,000 for each ad hoc telephonic special Board of Directors
meeting attended;
|
|
|
$1,000 for each regularly scheduled committee meeting
attended; and
|
|
|
$500 for each ad hoc telephonic committee meeting attended.
|
Grants made under the Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
are made pursuant to the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
and vest in full on the day immediately following the first
anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Prim receives no
compensation for his service on our Board or Directors.
Code of
Conduct
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics. This code applies to all of the directors, officers
and employees of Primo and its subsidiaries. A copy of our Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our corporate
website (www.primowater.com). We expect that any
amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will
be disclosed on our website.
72
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion and analysis relates to our
compensation arrangements for:
(1) our principal executive officer (Billy D. Prim);
(2) our principal financial officer (Mark Castaneda);
(3) our only other current executive officer (Michael S.
Gunter); and
(4) two other individuals who served as executive
officers during a portion of 2010 but who were not serving as
such at December 31, 2010 (Duane G. Goodwin and Richard E.
Belmont, and together with Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and
Gunter, our NEOs).
This discussion and analysis should be read together with the
compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below.
This discussion and analysis includes statements regarding
financial and operating performance targets in the limited
context of our executive compensation program, and investors
should not evaluate these statements in any other context. This
discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking statements
that are based on our current considerations, expectations and
determinations regarding future compensation programs. The
actual amount and form of compensation and the compensation
programs that we adopt in the future may differ materially from
current or planned programs as summarized in this discussion.
Introduction
Our compensation discussion and analysis discusses the total
compensation for our NEOs and describes our overall compensation
philosophy, objectives and practices. Our compensation
philosophy and objectives generally apply to all of our
employees and all of our employees are eligible to participate
in the main components of our compensation program consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
annual bonus and incentive arrangements; and
|
|
|
equity compensation.
|
The relative value of each of these components for individual
employees varies based on job role and responsibility as well as
our financial performance.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our compensation approach has changed and developed over the
last several years as we have experienced rapid growth. We
completed both our initial public offering and the acquisition
of a refill vending business from Culligan Store Solutions, LLC
and Culligan Canada in November 2010. We made changes to our
compensation programs during 2010 in anticipation of our
becoming a larger publicly-traded company.
Our compensation philosophy is to offer our executive officers
compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our
goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled
management, which is necessary to achieve our financial and
strategic objectives and create long-term value for our
stockholders. Accordingly, our executive officer compensation
program is designed to link annual and long-term cash and stock
incentives to the achievement of Company and individual
performance goals and to align the interests of executive
officers with the creation of stockholder value.
We believe compensation should be determined within a framework
that is intended to reward individual contribution and the
achievement of Company objectives. Within this overall
philosophy, our objectives are to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate our executives by providing a total
compensation program that takes into consideration competitive
market requirements and strategic business needs;
|
|
|
align the financial interests of executive officers with those
of our stockholders, both in the short and long term;
|
|
|
provide incentives for achieving and exceeding annual and
long-term performance goals; and
|
|
|
appropriately reward executive officers for creating long-term
stockholder value.
|
73
Each of Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and Gunter entered into an
employment agreement with the Company in connection with our
initial public offering. The material terms of those employment
agreements are described below under Employment
Agreements. We also entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Goodwin in connection with our initial public
offering. Mr. Goodwin was employed with us through
December 21, 2010, and we entered into a separation
agreement with him on December 22, 2010 that is also
described below.
Determining
Executive Compensation
Prior to our November 2010 initial public offering, we were a
privately-held company. As a result, we were not subject to any
stock exchange listing or SEC rules requiring a majority of our
Board of Directors to be independent or relating to the
formation and functioning of Board committees, including our
Compensation Committee. Historically, we informally considered
the competitive market for corresponding positions within
comparable geographic areas and with companies of similar sizes
and stages of development, including other small, high-growth
public companies, in structuring and setting our executive
compensation. This consideration was based on the general
knowledge possessed by members of our Compensation Committee and
also included consultations with our Chief Executive Officer. As
we continue to gain experience as a public company, we expect
that the specific direction, emphasis and components of our
executive compensation program will evolve. For example, over
time, we expect to reduce our reliance upon subjective
determinations in favor of a more empirically based approach
that could involve, among other practices, benchmarking the
compensation paid to our NEOs against peer companies that we
identify and the use of clearly defined, objective targets to
determine incentive compensation awards.
Our Compensation Committee typically considers, but is not
required to accept, our Chief Executive Officers
recommendations regarding proposed base salaries, bonus and
incentive awards, and equity awards for the other NEOs. The
Compensation Committee may also request the assistance of our
Chief Financial Officer in evaluating the financial, accounting
and tax implications of various compensation awards paid to the
NEOs. However, our Chief Financial Officer does not recommend or
determine the amounts or types of compensation paid to the NEOs.
Our Chief Executive Officer and certain of our other NEOs may
attend Compensation Committee meetings, as requested by the
chairman of the Compensation Committee. Our NEOs, including our
Chief Executive Officer, typically do not attend any portion of
the Compensation Committee meetings during which their
compensation is established and approved.
We believe the levels of compensation we provide should be
competitive, reasonable and appropriate for our business needs
and circumstances. To date, the Compensation Committee has not
engaged a compensation consultant. Rather, the Compensation
Committee and our Chief Executive Officer have applied
subjective discretion to make compensation decisions and have
not used a specific formula or matrix to set compensation in
relation to compensation paid by other companies. To date, our
Compensation Committee has not established any percentile
targets for the levels of compensation provided to our NEOs.
Similarly, the Compensation Committee has not performed
competitive reviews of our compensation programs with those of
similarly-situated companies, nor have we engaged in
benchmarking of compensation paid to our NEOs. Our historical
approach has been to consider competitive compensation practices
and other factors such as the level of compensation necessary to
recruit and retain an executive and individual performance
rather than establishing compensation at specific benchmark
percentiles. This approach has enabled us to respond to dynamics
in the labor market and provided us with flexibility in
maintaining and enhancing our NEOs engagement, focus,
motivation and enthusiasm for our future. However, as mentioned
above, we expect to build some of these practices into our
compensation approach over time as we continue to review,
evaluate and refine our compensation policies and practices as a
public company.
In connection with our initial public offering, we reconstituted
our Compensation Committee to be comprised of
Messrs. Dupree, McQuilkin and Warnock, with
Mr. Warnock acting as chair. Our Compensation Committee is
currently comprised of Messrs. Kilgore, McQuilkin and Warnock,
with Mr. Warnock acting as chair. Each of the members of our
Compensation Committee is independent within the
meaning of applicable Nasdaq listing standards. Our Compensation
Committees charter provides, among other things, that the
Compensation Committees principal duties include
(i) reviewing our compensation policies and practices,
(ii) reviewing and approving the compensation for our
senior executives, (iii) evaluating the performance of our
senior executives and (iv) assisting in the Companys
compliance with the regulations of the SEC regarding executive
compensation disclosure.
74
The amount of past compensation, including annual bonus and
incentive awards and amounts realized or realizable from prior
restricted stock and stock option awards, is generally not a
significant factor in the Compensation Committees
considerations because these awards would have been earned based
on performance in prior years. The Compensation Committee does,
however, consider prior awards when considering the retention
aspects of our compensation program.
Our NEOs are not subject to mandated stock ownership or stock
retention guidelines. Our Compensation Committee believes that
the equity component of our executive compensation program
ensures that our NEOs are also owners and those components work
to align the NEOs goals with the best interests of our
stockholders.
Elements
of Our Executive Compensation Program
The principal elements of our executive compensation program
have to date been (a) base salary, (b) a discretionary
annual cash bonus opportunity for 2009 and prior years,
(c) an executive cash and equity incentive arrangement for
2010 and (d) long-term equity compensation in the form of
restricted stock, stock options and restricted stock units. Each
of those compensation elements satisfies one or more of our
compensation objectives.
We have not adopted any policies with respect to long-term
versus currently-paid compensation, but feel that both elements
are necessary for achieving our compensation objectives.
Compensation in the form of a base salary provides financial
stability for each of our NEOs and annual increases in base
salary provide a reward for short-term Company and individual
performance. Annual cash bonuses and incentive awards likewise
provide a reward for short-term Company and individual
performance. Long-term equity compensation rewards achievement
of strategic long-term objectives and contributes toward overall
stockholder value. Similarly, while we have not adopted any
policies with respect to cash versus non-cash compensation (or
among different forms of non-cash compensation), we feel that it
is important to encourage or provide for a meaningful amount of
equity ownership by our NEOs to help align their interests with
those of stockholders, one of our compensation objectives. We
have also in the past used equity compensation in order to
preserve the Companys cash to the extent practicable in
order to facilitate our growth and development. We combine the
compensation elements for each NEO in a manner that the
Compensation Committee believes, in its discretion and judgment,
is consistent with the executives contributions to our
Company and our overall goals with respect to executive
compensation.
Base
Salary
We believe that a competitive base salary is an important
component of compensation as it provides a degree of financial
stability for our NEOs and is critical to recruiting and
retaining our executives. Base salary is also designed to
recognize the scope of responsibilities placed on each NEO and
reward each executive for his or her unique leadership skills,
management experience and contributions. We make a subjective
determination of base salary after considering such factors
collectively.
During February 2010, in anticipation of our initial public
offering, we reviewed and made certain adjustments to the base
salaries for our NEOs as set forth in the table below. In April
2010, we entered into employment agreements with each of
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda, Gunter and Goodwin that provided
for continued base salaries at the amounts set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Base Salary
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
173,673
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
183,195
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
The Committee believed the adjustment in
Mr. Castanedas base salary was appropriate in light
of his increased responsibilities associated with our initial
public offering. The Committee believed the increases in
Mr. Gunter and Mr. Belmonts base salaries were
appropriate as a result of their increased responsibilities and
efforts in managing Primos growth.
75
Annual
Incentive and Bonus Arrangements
2010
Executive Incentive Plan
We established an executive incentive plan for 2010, which
included an opportunity for both a cash award and an equity
award for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee
structured and implemented this plan to motivate our executive
officers to achieve our annual strategic and financial goals.
The 2010 executive incentive plan provided for cash and equity
awards with the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
o
|
A cash incentive pool was to be created based upon the amount by
which the Companys actual earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization as adjusted for non-cash,
non-recurring items (EBITDA) for 2010 exceeded
target EBITDA of $2.5 million. This cash pool would be
funded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
50% of the first $1.0 million of actual EBITDA in excess of
target EBITDA; plus
|
|
n
|
30% of the next $1.0 million of actual EBITDA in excess of
target EBITDA; plus
|
|
n
|
20% of any actual EBITDA more than $2.0 million in excess
of target EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Each participant in the executive incentive plan for 2010 would
then be entitled to the portion of the cash incentive pool equal
to that participants individual 2010 base salary over the
total 2010 base salaries of all the participants in the 2010
executive incentive plan multiplied by the total amount in the
cash incentive pool.
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Target amounts were to be based on Company and employee-specific
performance; and
|
|
o
|
Actual awards, if any, were to be determined in early 2011 and
were to be based on the Compensation Committees subjective
evaluation of Primos and each individuals
performance.
|
Our actual EBITDA for 2010 was $(1.5) million, which was
less than the target EBITDA under the 2010 executive incentive
plan. As a result, no cash amounts were paid and no equity
awards were made to our executive officers with respect to our
2010 performance.
Discretionary
Equity Awards
On March 18, 2011, our Compensation Committee approved
grants of equity awards to certain of our executive officers and
key employees. The Compensation Committee approved these awards
in recognition of the employees efforts with respect to
our successful initial public offering and the recent
acquisition transactions as well as the increased
responsibilities resulting from being a publicly traded company
with significantly larger operations.
The following table provides information regarding the
restricted stock units and stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Stock Options
|
Name
|
|
Units
(#)(1)
|
|
Units
($)(2)
|
|
(#)(3)
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
246,600
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
165,493
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
184,950
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
124,120
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
123,300
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
82,747
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
61,650
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
41,373
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These restricted stock units vest
in equal annual installments on March 29 of each of 2012, 2013,
and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts set forth in this column
represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock unit
awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For
additional information regarding the assumptions made in
calculating these amounts, see the notes to our audited
financial statements included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
These stock options vest in equal
annual installments on March 29 of each of 2012, 2013 and 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Amounts set forth in this column
represent the grant date fair value of stock option awards
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional
information regarding the assumptions made in calculating these
amounts, see the notes to our audited financial statements
included herein.
|
76
Discretionary
Cash Bonuses
We have also from time to time in the past paid discretionary
annual cash bonuses to our executive officers. We did not pay
any such discretionary cash bonuses with respect to our
performance in 2009 or 2010.
The employment agreements for each of Messrs. Prim,
Castaneda and Gunter do not provide for specified annual
incentive or bonus awards. Instead, these employment agreements
simply provide that each such executive is entitled to receive
bonuses and awards of equity and non-equity compensation as
approved by our Board of Directors.
Long-Term
Equity Compensation
Historically, we have provided long-term equity compensation
primarily through grants of restricted stock and stock options.
We have in the past granted restricted stock and stock options
through annually-adopted executive incentive plans, initial
grants to new employees and, on occasion, through additional
grants approved by our Board of Directors or the Compensation
Committee. We intend to continue these practices in the future
as we believe that such grants further our compensation
objectives of aligning the interests of our NEOs with those of
our stockholders, encouraging long-term performance, and
providing a simple and
easy-to-understand
form of equity compensation that promotes executive retention.
We view such grants both as incentives for future performance
and as compensation for past accomplishments.
On February 18, 2010, we made restricted stock awards to
our NEOs in the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Restricted
|
Name
|
|
Stock
(#)(1)
|
|
Stock
($)(2)
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
23,957
|
|
|
|
307,608
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
14,374
|
|
|
|
184,562
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
14,374
|
|
|
|
184,562
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These shares of restricted stock
vest in three equal annual installments on the first, second and
third anniversary of the grant date.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts set forth in this column
represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional
information regarding the assumptions made in calculating these
amounts, see the notes to our audited financial statements
included herein.
|
In determining the amounts of the restricted stock grants to
each of our executive officers, our Compensation Committee
considered each officers position and level of
responsibility at Primo and the officers individual
contribution to Primos performance.
We adopted a policy in connection with our initial public
offering that provides for our Compensation Committee to approve
stock option grants up to four times per year at its regularly
scheduled quarterly meetings, and further provides that such
grants will be effective on the third trading day following the
date of the next public disclosure of our financial results
following the date of each such meeting.
Perquisites
and Other Benefits
As a general matter, we do not offer perquisites or other
benefits to any executive officer, including the NEOs, with an
aggregate value in excess of $10,000 annually, because we
believe we can provide better incentives for desired performance
with compensation in the forms described above. We recognize
that, from time to time, it may be appropriate to provide some
perquisites or other benefits in order to attract, motivate and
retain our executives, with any such decision to be reviewed and
approved by the Compensation Committee.
Our executive officers are eligible to participate in customary
employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, vision, life
and other employee benefit and insurance plans made available to
employees. We maintain a 401(k) plan, which is intended to be a
tax-qualified defined contribution plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code. In general, all of our employees are
eligible to participate in this plan. The
77
401(k) plan includes a salary deferral arrangement pursuant to
which participants may elect to reduce their current
compensation by up to 90% or the statutory limit, $16,500 in
2010, whichever is less, and have the amount of the reduction
contributed to the 401(k) plan. In 2010 our Board of Directors
established a company match of up to 50% of employee
contributions up to 6% of their salaries, with 50% of the
matching amount being contingent upon our achievement of certain
objectives to be determined by our Board of Directors. For 2010,
the contingent portion of the company match under the 401(k)
plan was based upon our achieving EBITDA of $2.5 million.
Since our actual 2010 EBITDA was below this targeted level, this
contingent match was not earned for 2010.
Employment
and Severance and Change of Control Benefits
We believe that a strong, experienced management team is
essential to the best interests of the Company and our
stockholders. We recognize that the possibility of a change of
control could arise and that such a possibility could result in
the departure or distraction of members of the management team
to the detriment of our Company and our stockholders. We entered
into employment agreements with Messrs. Prim, Castaneda,
Gunter and Goodwin in connection with our initial public
offering, which are intended to minimize employment security
concerns arising in the course of negotiating and completing a
change of control transaction. A more detailed description of
the change of control provisions provided in these employment
agreements is available under the section captioned
Employment Agreements below, and the change of
control benefits are quantified in the section captioned
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of
Control. Our separation agreement with Mr. Goodwin is
also discussed below under Employment Agreements.
Tax
Considerations
Other than our Chief Executive Officer, we have not agreed to
provide any executive officer or director with a
gross-up or
other reimbursement for tax amounts the executive might pay
pursuant to Section 280G or Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code. As described in the section below
captioned Employment Agreements, any payments our
Chief Executive Officer receives in connection with a change of
control may be subject to increase to cover any excise tax
imposed by Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
Section 280G and related Code sections provide that
executive officers, directors who hold significant stockholder
interests and certain other service providers could be subject
to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or
benefits in connection with a change of control that exceed
certain limits, and that we or our successor could lose a
deduction on the amounts subject to the additional tax.
Section 409A also imposes additional significant taxes on
the individual in the event that an executive officer, director
or service provider receives deferred compensation
that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A.
Because of the limitations of Internal Revenue Code
Section 162(m), our federal income tax deduction for
compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to certain
other highly compensated executive officers (other than our
Chief Financial Officer) may be limited if the compensation
exceeds $1,000,000 per person during any fiscal year, unless it
is performance-based under Code Section 162(m)
or meets another exception to the deduction limits. In addition
to salary and bonus compensation, upon the exercise of stock
options that are not treated as incentive stock options, the
excess of the current market price over the option price, or the
option spread, is treated as compensation and accordingly, in
any year, such exercise may cause an officers total
compensation to exceed $1,000,000. However, option compensation
will not be subject to the $1,000,000 cap on deductibility if
the options meet certain requirements, and in the past we have
granted options that we believe met those requirements.
Additionally, under a special Code Section 162(m)
transition rule, any compensation paid pursuant to a
compensation plan in existence before the effective date of our
initial public offering will not be subject to the $1,000,000
limitation until the first meeting of stockholders at which
directors are elected after the close of the third calendar year
following the year in which our initial public offering
occurred, unless the compensation plan is materially modified.
While the Compensation Committee cannot predict how the
deductibility limit may impact our compensation programs in
future years, the Compensation Committee intends to maintain an
approach to executive compensation that links pay to
performance. In addition, while the Compensation Committee has
not adopted a formal policy regarding tax deductibility of
compensation paid to our NEOs, the Compensation Committee
intends to consider tax deductibility under Code
Section 162(m) as a factor in compensation decisions.
78
Risk
Analysis of Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Companys
compensation program and does not believe that it encourages
excessive or unnecessary risk taking. Base salaries are fixed in
amount and thus do not encourage risk taking. By utilizing
annual cash bonuses and incentive awards that are tied to
individual and Company-wide performance measures and long-term
equity compensation as a significant portion of total
compensation, the Compensation Committee believes that it has
aligned our executive officers objectives with those of
our long-term stockholders.
Conclusion
The Compensation Committee believes that our executive
leadership is a key element to our success and that the
compensation package offered to our NEOs is a key element in
attracting and retaining the appropriate personnel.
The Compensation Committee believes it has maintained
compensation for our NEOs at levels that are reflective of the
talent and success of the individuals being compensated, and
with the inclusion of additional compensation directly tied to
performance, the Compensation Committee believes executive
compensation will be sufficiently comparable to its industry
peers to allow us to retain our key personnel at costs which are
appropriate for us.
The Compensation Committee will continue to develop, analyze and
review its methods for aligning our executive officers
long-term compensation with the benefits generated for
stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes the idea of
creating ownership helps align managements interests with
the interests of stockholders. The Compensation Committee has no
pre-determined timeline for implementing new or ongoing
long-term incentive plans. New plans will be reviewed, discussed
and implemented as the Compensation Committee believes necessary
or appropriate as a measure to incentivize, retain and reward
our NEOs.
2010
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the total compensation paid or
earned by each of our NEOs during the year ended
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
403,292
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
400,138
|
|
Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
243,281
|
|
|
|
307,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
553,287
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,399
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
244,492
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
211,098
|
|
|
|
184,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
395,720
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
173,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
173,425
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
211,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,960
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
266,924
|
|
Former Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
Development(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
195,476
|
|
|
|
184,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
382,022
|
|
Vice President,
Products(2)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
183,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
194,880
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Goodwin served as Senior
Vice President, Business Development from February 15, 2010
through December 22, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Belmont serves as Vice
President, Products. Following a restructuring of Primos
internal management reporting structure in February 2010, our
Board of Directors determined that Mr. Belmont no longer
served as an executive officer of Primo.
|
Salaries
(Column (c))
Base salaries for Messrs Prim, Castaneda and Gunter are
specified in their employment agreements which are described in
greater detail in Employment Agreements below.
79
Stock
Awards and Option Awards (Columns (d) and (e))
The amounts shown in the Stock Awards and
Option Awards columns represent the aggregate grant
date fair value of restricted stock and stock option awards
computed in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards
Codification Topic 718 (FASB ASC Topic 718). For
additional information regarding the assumptions made in
calculating these amounts, see the notes to our audited
financial statements included herein.
All Other
Compensation (Column (f))
Amounts shown in this column consist of life insurance premiums
paid on behalf of each NEO and matching contributions to the
NEOs accounts under Primos 401(k) plan.
2010
Grants of Plan Based Awards
The following table shows grants of plan-based awards made to
our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
|
|
All Other Stock
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Awards: Number of
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
Target
($)(1)
|
|
Shares of Stock
(#)(2)
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,957
|
|
|
|
307,608
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,374
|
|
|
|
184,562
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
3/5/2010
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/18/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,374
|
|
|
|
184,562
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts in this column relate
to cash incentive awards under our 2010 executive incentive plan
that provided for potential payments to our NEOs and other
employees to the extent that our 2010 earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
exceeded a targeted level of EBITDA. In accordance with the
SECs rules, we are including $-0- as the
representative amount of this award because
(a) there was no targeted payout amount with respect to the
award and (b) the target level of EBITDA under the 2010
executive incentive plan was above our actual EBITDA for 2009.
Primos actual 2010 EBITDA was less than target EBITDA
under the 2010 executive incentive plan and, as a result, no
amounts were paid to our NEOs or other employees pursuant to
these cash incentive awards. The material terms of the 2010
executive incentive plan are described in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 73.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts set forth in this column
reflect grants of restricted stock under our 2004 Stock Plan.
These restricted stock grants vest in equal installments on the
first, second and third anniversary of the grant date.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Amounts set forth in this column
represent the grant date fair value of the restricted stock
awards described in Note (2) above computed in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information regarding
the assumptions made in calculating these amounts, see the notes
to our audited financial statements herein.
|
80
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2010
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding
equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
of Shares of
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
|
Shares of Stock
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable(1)
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
Vested
($)(2)
|
|
Billy D.
Prim(3)
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
11/01/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
01/25/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.66
|
|
|
|
05/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
14,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.66
|
|
|
|
05/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
01/29/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,957(4
|
)
|
|
|
340,429
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
11/01/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
01/25/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
01/25/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,374(4
|
)
|
|
|
204,255
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
02/18/20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
09/11/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
01/25/17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.66
|
|
|
|
05/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
01/29/19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,374(4
|
)
|
|
|
204,255
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All outstanding unvested options
vested in their entirety upon the closing of our initial public
offering on November 10, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts set forth in this
column were calculated by multiplying the closing market price
of Primos common stock on December 31, 2010 ($14.21)
by the number of shares held on such date.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Excludes 12,500 shares of
restricted stock issued to Mr. Prim in 2010 in connection
with his agreement to personally guarantee Primos
borrowings under the overadvance line under our former senior
revolving credit facility. See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Issuance of Restricted
Stock to Mr. Prim.
|
|
(4)
|
|
These shares vest in equal annual
installments on February 18 of 2011, 2012 and 2013.
|
2010
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
No stock options held by our NEOs were exercised during the year
ended December 31, 2010, and no restricted stock awards
held by our NEOs vested during the year ended December 31,
2010.
81
2010
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of
Control
The following table sets forth the amounts payable to
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda, Gunter and Belmont upon
termination of his employment under various scenarios or a
change of control of Primo, assuming each of the events occurred
on December 31, 2010. The amounts set forth in the
following table with respect to Mr. Goodwin represent the
amount Mr. Goodwin is actually receiving pursuant to the
separation arrangement he entered into with Primo in connection
with the termination of his employment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
without Cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause or
|
|
|
without Cause
|
|
|
for Good Reason
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Change-in-
|
|
Benefits and Payments
|
|
without Good
|
|
|
or for Good
|
|
|
following a
|
|
|
due to
|
|
|
due to
|
|
|
Control (No
|
|
Upon Termination
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
Change-in-Control
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Termination)
|
|
|
Billy D. Prim:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
800,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual Cash
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
Vesting(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health
Insurance(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
17,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
Insurance(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability
Coverage(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
409,540
|
|
|
$
|
819,080
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Castaneda::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary(5)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual Cash
Bonus(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,481
|
(7)
|
|
|
340,429
|
(8)
|
|
|
340,429
|
(9)
|
|
|
340,429
|
(9)
|
|
|
340,429
|
(8)
|
Health
Insurance(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
18,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
Insurance(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability
Coverage(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
376,961
|
|
|
$
|
735,644
|
|
|
$
|
340,429
|
|
|
$
|
340,429
|
|
|
$
|
340,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Gunter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary(5)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
337,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual Cash
Bonus(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,094
|
(7)
|
|
|
204,255
|
(8)
|
|
|
204,255
|
(9)
|
|
|
204,255
|
(9)
|
|
|
204,255
|
(8)
|
Health
Insurance(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
18,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
Insurance(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability
Coverage(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
306,574
|
|
|
$
|
561,970
|
|
|
$
|
204,255
|
|
|
$
|
204,255
|
|
|
$
|
204,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duane G. Goodwin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary(11)
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health
Insurance(12)
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
137,540
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual Cash Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,255
|
(9)
|
|
|
204,255
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
|
Health Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
204,255
|
|
|
$
|
204,255
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents a payment equal to
Mr. Prims highest base salary in effect during the
12 months immediately prior to the termination date in the
case of a termination without Cause or for Good Reason and a
payment equal to two times Mr. Prims highest base
salary in effect during the 12 months immediately prior to
the termination date in the case of a termination without Cause
or for Good Reason in connection with a Change of Control.
|
82
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents a payment equal to the
average annual bonus earned by Mr. Prim for the most recent
two fiscal years ending prior to the termination date in the
case of a termination without Cause or for Good Reason and a
payment equal to 2.0 times the average annual bonus earned by
Mr. Prim for the most recent two fiscal years ending prior
to the termination date in the case of a termination without
Cause or for Good Reason in connection with a Change of Control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Excludes 12,500 shares of
restricted stock issued to Mr. Prim in 2010 in connection
with his agreement to personally guarantee Primos
borrowings under the overadvance line under our former senior
revolving credit facility. See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Issuance of Restricted
Stock to Mr. Prim.
|
|
(4)
|
|
In the case of a termination
without Cause or for Good Reason, represents the estimated
incremental cost to maintain coverage under the applicable
policy for 12 months. In the case of a termination without
Cause or for Good Reason in connection with a Change of Control,
represents the estimated incremental cost to us to maintain
coverage under the applicable policy for 24 months.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents a payment equal to such
executives highest base salary in effect during the
12 months immediately prior to the termination date in the
case of a termination without Cause or for Good Reason and a
payment equal to 1.5 times such executives highest base
salary in effect during the 12 months immediately prior to
the termination date in the case of a termination without Cause
or for Good Reason in connection with a Change of Control.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Represents a payment equal to the
average annual bonus earned by the executive for the most recent
two fiscal years ending prior to the termination date in the
case of a termination without Cause or for Good Reason and a
payment equal to 1.5 times the average annual bonus earned by
the executive for the most recent two fiscal years ending prior
to the termination date in the case of a termination without
Cause or for Good Reason in connection with a Change of Control.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Represents the value of restricted
shares of common stock held at December 31, 2010 which are
scheduled to vest within six months of such date, based upon the
closing market price on December 31, 2010 ($14.21) of the
shares of common stock.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Represents the value of restricted
shares of common stock held at December 31, 2010, based
upon the closing market price on December 31, 2010 ($14.21)
of the shares of common stock. These restricted shares would
vest in full upon a change in control under the
terms of, and as defined in, each executives respective
employment agreement as discussed below.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Represents the value of restricted
shares of common stock held at December 31, 2010, based
upon the closing market price on December 31, 2010 ($14.21)
of the shares of common stock. Pursuant to the executives
restricted stock award agreement, these restricted shares would
vest in full upon the executives death or Disability (as
defined in the executives restricted stock award
agreement).
|
|
(10)
|
|
In the case of a termination
without Cause or for Good Reason, represents the estimated
incremental cost to maintain coverage under the applicable
policy for 12 months. In the case of a termination without
Cause or for Good Reason in connection with a Change of Control,
represents the estimated incremental cost to us to maintain
coverage under the applicable policy for 18 months.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Represents continuation of base
salary for a period of six months.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Represents the estimated
incremental cost to maintain health insurance coverage for
Mr. Goodwin for 12 months.
|
Employment
Agreements and Change of Control Arrangements
The following summaries of the employment agreements of
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and Gunter describe the new
employment agreements with such individuals that were entered
into in April 2010 in connection with our initial public
offering. We have not entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Belmont. We also entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Goodwin in connection with our initial public
offering and subsequently entered into a separation agreement
with him on December 22, 2010.
Employment
Agreements with Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and
Gunter
Mr. Prims employment agreement provides for a base
annual salary of $400,000, which may be adjusted up but not down
by our Board of Directors. Mr. Prim is also eligible to
receive bonuses and awards of equity and non-equity compensation
as approved by our Board of Directors. The employment agreement
entitles Mr. Prim to participate in all other benefits
generally available to our other senior executives.
Mr. Prims employment agreement also provides for:
(i) an annual automatic cost of living increase to base
salary based on the Consumer Price Index; (ii) long-term
disability coverage at 100% of base annual salary; (iii) an
annual physical paid for by Primo; and (iv) Primos
payment of certain attorneys fees incurred in the event
Mr. Prim has to take action to enforce his rights under the
employment agreement. We have agreed to maintain insurance
coverage for and indemnify Mr. Prim in connection with his
capacity as our director and officer.
Our employment agreement with Mr. Prim provides for an
initial three-year employment term that commenced April 1,
2010 and that automatically extends for additional one-year
periods unless terminated by Mr. Prim or us upon at least
90 days prior written notice of intention not to renew. The
agreement may also be terminated by us or Mr. Prim for
other reasons and, subject to the conditions set forth in the
employment agreement, provides for certain payments to
Mr. Prim upon a termination of his employment or a change
of control of Primo, as described below.
83
Our employment agreements with Messrs. Castaneda and Gunter
are substantially similar to our employment agreement with
Mr. Prim, except that the economic terms differ among the
agreements and their agreements do not provide for: (i) an
annual automatic cost of living increase to base salary;
(ii) additional long-term disability coverage; (iii) a
Primo-paid annual physical; (iv) our payment of certain
attorney fees; and (v) a Section 4999 excise tax
gross-up
payment to cover certain taxes and penalties.
Mr. Castanedas employment agreement provides for a
base annual salary of $250,000 and Mr. Gunters
employment agreement provides for a base annual salary of
$225,000, which base salaries may be adjusted up but not down by
our Board of Directors. Messrs. Castaneda and Gunter are
also eligible to receive bonuses and awards of equity and
non-equity compensation as approved by our Board of Directors.
The employment agreements entitle each of Messrs. Castaneda
and Gunter to participate in all other benefits generally
available to our other senior executives. We have agreed to
maintain insurance coverage for and indemnify each of
Messrs. Castaneda and Gunter in connection with their
respective capacities as officers.
Our employment agreements with each of Messrs. Castaneda
and Gunter provide for initial three-year employment terms that
commenced April 1, 2010 and that automatically extend for
additional one-year periods unless terminated by the NEO or us
upon at least 90 days prior written notice of intention not
to renew. The agreement may also be terminated by us or the NEO
for other reasons and, subject to the conditions set forth in
the employment agreement, provides for certain payments to be
made to such NEO upon a termination of his employment or a
change of control of Primo, as described below.
Under our agreements with Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and
Gunter, these individuals are entitled to certain benefits upon
their termination or upon a Change of Control (as defined in the
employment agreement and described below). The definitions of
Cause and Good Reason as used in the
employment agreements are also provided below.
Under these employment agreements, if any of Messrs. Prim,
Castaneda or Gunter is terminated without Cause or if any of
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda or Gunter resigns for Good Reason,
then such individual is entitled to the following benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
severance payments in an amount equal to (i) his highest
annual base salary in effect during the 12 months
immediately prior to his termination date plus (ii) the
average annual bonus earned by him for the most recent two
fiscal years ending prior to his termination date;
|
|
|
|
coverage under health, dental, life, accident, disability and
similar benefit plans offered to (and on the same terms as) the
other executive officers for the 12 months following his
termination date; and
|
|
|
|
the immediate vesting of any restricted stock, stock option or
other equity compensation awards scheduled to vest within six
months of his termination date.
|
Under these employment agreements, if any of Messrs. Prim,
Castaneda or Gunter is terminated without Cause or if any such
individual resigns for Good Reason, in either case within two
years following a Change of Control, then he is entitled to the
following benefits under his employment agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
severance payments in an amount equal to 1.5 times (two times in
the case of Mr. Prim) the sum of (i) his highest
annual base salary in effect during the 12 months
immediately prior to his termination date plus (ii) the
average annual bonus earned by him for the most recent two
fiscal years ending prior to his termination date; and
|
|
|
|
coverage under health, dental, life, accident, disability and
similar benefit plans offered to (and on the same terms as) the
other executive officers for the 18 months (24 months
in the case of Mr. Prim) following his termination date.
|
In addition, any restricted stock, stock option or other equity
compensation awards that are unvested will immediately vest as
of the date of the Change of Control.
Our employment agreements with Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and
Gunter provide that a Change of Control occurs when:
|
|
|
|
|
any individual, entity or group (a Person) becomes
the beneficial owner of 50% or more of either (A) the
then-outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (the
Outstanding Company Common Stock) or (B) the
combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities
of the Company entitled to vote
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
generally in the election of directors (the Outstanding
Company Voting Securities); provided, however, that the
following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change of Control:
(i) any acquisition directly from the Company,
(ii) any acquisition by the Company, (iii) any
acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust)
sponsored or maintained by the Company, or (iv) any
acquisition pursuant to a transaction that complies with (A),
(B) and (C) in the third bullet point below;
|
|
|
|
|
|
individuals who, as of the effective date of the agreement,
constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (the
Incumbent Board) cease for any reason to constitute
at least a majority of the Board of Directors; provided,
however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to
the effective date of the agreement whose election, or
nomination for election by the Companys stockholders, was
approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then
comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though
such individual was a member of the Incumbent Board, but
excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial
assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or
threatened election contest with respect to the election or
removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation
of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than
the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
there is consummation of a reorganization, merger or similar
transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries, a
sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
assets of the Company, or the acquisition of assets or stock of
another entity by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (each,
a Business Combination), in each case unless,
following such Business Combination, (A) all or
substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the
beneficial owners of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and
the Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to
such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or
indirectly, more than 50% of the then-outstanding shares of
common stock and the combined voting power of the entity
resulting from such Business Combination in substantially the
same proportions as their ownership immediately prior to such
Business Combination of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and
the Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be,
(B) no Person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly,
20% or more of the then-outstanding shares of common stock of
the corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the
combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities
of such corporation, except to the extent that such ownership
existed prior to the Business Combination, and (C) at least
a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the
entity resulting from such Business Combination were members of
the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial
agreement or of the action of the Board providing for such
Business Combination; or
|
|
|
|
the stockholders of the Company approve a complete liquidation
or dissolution of the Company.
|
As defined in the employment agreements for our NEOs,
Cause means (a) continued willful failure to
substantially perform his duties with the Company,
(b) willfully engaging in misconduct materially and
demonstrably injurious to the Company or (c) uncured
material breach of his agreement. An NEO may terminate his
employment for Good Reason (i) if there is a
material reduction in his duties or responsibilities,
(ii) if he is required to relocate to an employment
location more than 50 miles from his initial employment
location, or (iii) upon our uncured material breach of the
agreement.
Separation
Agreement with Mr. Goodwin
In connection with Mr. Goodwins termination of
employment, we entered into a separation agreement with
Mr. Goodwin effective December 22, 2010. Pursuant to
the separation agreement, we agreed to make severance payments
to Mr. Goodwin for a period of six months following
December 22, 2010 at a rate equal to his base salary of
$250,000 per year. Additionally, we agreed to provide health
insurance coverage to Mr. Goodwin under our health benefit
plans through the earlier of (a) December 31, 2011 or
(b) the date on which Mr. Goodwin becomes eligible for
coverage by a subsequent employer. Instead of providing health
insurance coverage during this period, we can reimburse
Mr. Goodwin on a monthly basis for the amount by which the
cost of COBRA continuation of his health insurance exceeds the
cost of his monthly premiums under our health benefit plans. We
also agreed to extend the expiration date of the outstanding and
vested stock options held by Mr. Goodwin until
June 22, 2011.
85
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our Audit Committee Charter requires our Audit Committee to
review and approve or ratify any related party transaction that
is required to be disclosed under Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
In the course of its review or approval of a transaction, our
Audit Committee will consider:
|
|
|
|
|
the nature of the related persons interest in the
transaction, including the actual or apparent conflict of
interest of the related person;
|
|
|
the material terms of the transaction and their commercial
reasonableness;
|
|
|
the significance of the transaction to the related person;
|
|
|
the significance of the transaction to us and the benefit and
perceived benefits, or lack thereof, to us;
|
|
|
opportunity costs of alternate transactions;
|
|
|
whether the transaction would impair the judgment of a director
or executive officer to act in the best interest of
Primo; and
|
|
|
any other matters the Committee deems appropriate.
|
No such related person transaction will be consummated without
the approval or ratification of our Audit Committee, and
directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse
themselves from any vote relating to a related person
transaction in which they have an interest.
Set forth below are certain transactions that have occurred
since January 1, 2008 with our directors, executive
officers, holders of more than five percent of our voting
securities and affiliates of our directors, executive officers
and five percent stockholders. Based on our experience and the
terms of our transactions with unaffiliated third persons, we
believe that all of the transactions set forth below were on
terms and conditions that were not materially less favorable to
us than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
Conversion
of Series A and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
and Conversion and Redemption of and Payment of Accrued and
Unpaid Dividends on Series B Preferred Stock
In connection with our initial public offering, all of our
outstanding shares of Series A and Series C
convertible preferred stock were converted into shares of our
common stock. The conversion ratio for our Series A
preferred stock was 1:0.0958. The conversion ratio for our
Series C preferred stock was 1:0.2000. The provisions
governing the conversion of our Series A and Series C
convertible preferred stock into common stock were approved in
October 2010 by the holders of a majority of the shares of each
such series of preferred stock in accordance with the terms of
our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
There were no accrued and unpaid dividends on our Series A
and Series C convertible preferred stock.
Also in connection with our initial public offering, 50% of our
outstanding Series B preferred stock was converted into
shares of our common stock at a ratio of 1:0.0926, which was
calculated by dividing the liquidation preference of the
Series B preferred stock by 90% of the initial public
offering price of our common stock of $12.00 per share, and the
balance of the outstanding Series B preferred stock was
redeemed for cash. Accrued and unpaid dividends on all
outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock were paid in
cash at the time of the conversion and redemption. The
provisions governing the conversion and redemption of our
Series B preferred stock on the terms described above were
approved by the requisite vote of our stockholders in October
2010. In connection with the foregoing, Primo also modified the
terms of the warrants issued to the holders of the Series B
preferred stock and Series C convertible preferred stock
such that these warrants to purchase an aggregate of
715,646 shares of our common stock did not expire upon the
consummation of the initial public offering and instead will
expire on the date such warrants would have otherwise expired
had the initial public offering not occurred. The exercise price
of the warrants issued to the holders of the Series C
convertible preferred stock was also adjusted from $20.66 to
$13.04. This treatment of the Series B preferred stock,
Series C convertible preferred stock and the warrants
issued in connection with the Series B preferred stock and
Series C convertible preferred stock was determined by
Primo after discussions and negotiations with significant
holders of Series B preferred stock and Series C
convertible preferred stock and after consultation with
Primos investment bankers.
86
Mr. Prim used all after-tax cash proceeds received in
connection with the redemption of his Series B preferred
stock (but not the payment of accrued dividends thereon) to
purchase 190,000 additional shares of common stock from the
underwriters in the initial public offering at the $12.00
initial public offering price per share.
The following table sets forth (i) the number of shares of
common stock issued to our executive officers, directors and
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock in
connection with conversion of all of the Series A and
Series C convertible preferred stock and the conversion of
50% of the Series B preferred stock, (ii) the dollar
amount received by each of the executive officers, directors and
five percent or greater shareholders in connection with the
redemption of the remaining 50% of the Series B preferred
stock and the payment of accrued and unpaid dividends on all
outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock, and
(iii) the number of shares of common stock subject to
warrants issued in connection with our Series B preferred
stock and Series C convertible preferred stock held by each
such executive, officer, director and five percent or greater
shareholder:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Received Upon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of and
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Accrued and
|
|
Stock Issuable Upon
|
|
|
Number of Shares of
|
|
Unpaid Dividends on Series
|
|
Exercise of Series B
|
|
|
Common Stock Issued (#)
|
|
B Preferred Stock($)
|
|
and C Warrants (#)
|
|
Directors and executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
464,607
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,067,763
|
|
|
|
138,854
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
45,114
|
|
|
|
146,507
|
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
David W.
Dupree(2)
|
|
|
856,232
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,028
|
|
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
|
163,607
|
(4)
|
|
|
441,616
|
|
|
|
17,269
|
|
David L. Warnock
|
|
|
593,042
|
(5)
|
|
|
2,208,082
|
|
|
|
84,747
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
30,445
|
|
|
|
29,301
|
|
|
|
2,397
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
5,997
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
5% or greater stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primo Investors, L.P.
|
|
|
856,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,028
|
|
Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
|
|
|
569,380
|
|
|
|
2,119,980
|
|
|
|
81,365
|
|
Andrew J. Filipowski
|
|
|
573,035
|
(7)
|
|
|
96,604
|
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
Craig J. Duchossois Revocable Trust
|
|
|
458,323
|
|
|
|
828,031
|
|
|
|
36,771
|
|
Charles Ergen
|
|
|
416,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,965
|
|
Edward A. Fortino Trust
|
|
|
291,660
|
|
|
|
659,281
|
|
|
|
28,785
|
|
Murphy Alternative Investments, LLC
|
|
|
314,808
|
|
|
|
3,680,137
|
|
|
|
131,928
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 456,576 shares issued to Mr. Prim directly;
(b) 3,240 shares issued to Mr. Prims
spouse; and (c) 4,791 shares issued to Billy D. Prim
Revocable Trust, of which Mr. Prim is the sole trustee.
Excludes shares that Mr. Prim purchased from the
underwriters in the initial offering at the initial public
offering price per share.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Dupree served as a member
of the Board of Directors of the Company until May 18, 2011.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of 856,232 shares
issued to Primo Investors, L.P. Mr. Dupree is the managing
member of GenPar Primo, L.L.C., the general partner of Primo
Investors, L.P.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of 163,607 shares
issued to the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust. Mr. McQuilkin
is a co-trustee of the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 569,380 shares issued to Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P.; and (b) 23,662 shares issued to
Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock is the managing member of the general
partner of both Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 1,999 shares issued to Mr. Belmonts
spouse; (b) 1,999 shares issued to
Mr. Belmonts son; and (c) 1,999 shares
issued to Mr. Belmonts daughter.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 122,629 shares issued to Mr. Filipowski
directly; (b) 325,826 shares issued to the Andrew J.
Filipowski Revocable Trust; (c) 28,749 shares issued
to the Robinwood Gift Trust; and (d) 95,831 shares
issued to the Filipowski Foundation.
|
87
Issuance
of Restricted Stock to Mr. Prim
In connection with a May 2010 amendment of our former senior
revolving credit facility, Mr. Prim personally guaranteed
our borrowings with respect to the overadvance line in an amount
up to $3.0 million. As an inducement to Mr. Prim to
guarantee the $3.0 million overadvance line, Primo issued
Mr. Prim $150,000 of restricted stock (or
12,500 shares) with the per share value equal to the
initial public offering price of $12.00 per share. The
restricted stock was issued on November 10, 2010 and vested
in full on January 2, 2011. The award of restricted stock
was approved by the independent members of the Board of
Directors and the amount of the award was based upon 5% of the
guaranteed obligations (which the board members believed was an
appropriate amount in light of their experience with similar
transactions and representative of a 2.5% commitment fee and a
2.5% draw-down fee).
Sale of
Subordinated Convertible Notes and Warrants
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda, Belmont, Brenner, Dupree,
McQuilkin, Warnock, Ergen, Duchossois and Fortino (either
individually or through an affiliated entity) purchased an
aggregate of $3.52 million of our 14% subordinated
convertible notes due March 31, 2011 (all such notes with
these terms being referred to herein as the 2011
Notes) with an aggregate of 42,807 warrants to purchase
shares of our common stock in a private placement transaction on
December 30, 2009. The exercise price of these warrants is
$9.60 per share. A portion of the purchase price for these 2011
Notes was paid for by certain of these investors by rolling over
an equivalent amount of their participation interests in the
January 2009 financing described in Participation
Interests in Loan and Security Agreement below. We issued
a total of $15.0 million of 2011 Notes and a total of
106,482 warrants in this private placement transaction.
Messrs. Prim, Brenner, Dupree, McQuilkin, Warnock,
Duchossois and Fortino (either individually or through an
affiliated entity) purchased an additional aggregate of
$2.4 million of our 2011 Notes and an aggregate of 16,929
warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in a second
private placement transaction on October 5, 2010. We issued
a total of $3.4 million of 2011 Notes and a total of 24,265
warrants in this second private placement transaction. The
exercise price of these warrants is $9.60 per share.
All of our 2011 Notes and all accrued interest thereon were
repaid in full in November 2010 using proceeds of our initial
public offering. The following table sets forth certain
information regarding such persons purchase of the 2011
Notes and related warrants issued in both private placement
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Amount
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Principal
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Paid in
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
in December
|
|
in October
|
|
in October
|
|
in October
|
|
2010*
|
|
2010*
|
|
|
Name
|
|
2009 ($)
|
|
2009 (#)
|
|
2010 ($)
|
|
2010 (#)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
Directors and executive officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
540,000
|
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
790,000
|
|
|
|
76,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
11,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W.
Dupree(2)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
133,000
|
|
|
|
13,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm
McQuilkin(3)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,099
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
165,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
David L.
Warnock(4)
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
9,939
|
|
|
|
466,667
|
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
|
1,866,667
|
|
|
|
189,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
36,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
12,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% or greater stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig J. Duchossois Revocable Trust
|
|
|
1,030,000
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
345,000
|
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
143,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Ergen
|
|
|
740,000
|
|
|
|
5,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,000
|
|
|
|
95,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward A. Fortino Trust
|
|
|
740,000
|
|
|
|
5,253
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
990,000
|
|
|
|
100,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
No principal or interest was paid
with respect to 2011 Notes in 2009.
|
88
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of $80,000 in 2011 Notes
and 568 warrants held by Mr. Brenner individually, $20,000
in 2011 Notes and 142 warrants held by the ALB-3 Trust and
$20,000 in 2011 Notes and 142 warrants held by the ALB-5 Trust.
Mr. Brenner is the trustee of both the ALB-3 Trust and the
ALB-5 Trust. Mr. Brenner disclaims beneficial ownership of
2011 Notes owned by the ALB-3 Trust and the ALB-5 Trust except
to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Dupree served as a member of
the Board of Directors of the Company until May 18, 2011.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of $2,000,000 in 2011
Notes and 14,198 warrants held by the Malcolm McQuilkin Living
Trust. Mr. McQuilkin is a co-trustee of the Malcolm
McQuilkin Living Trust.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of $1,792,187 in 2011
Notes and 12,723 warrants held by Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P. and $74,480 in 2011 Notes and 529 warrants
held by Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock is the managing member of the general
partner of both Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock disclaims beneficial ownership of 2011
Notes owned by Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. and
Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
Participation
Interests in Loan and Security Agreement
On January 7, 2009, we and certain of our subsidiaries
entered into a $10.0 million Loan and Security Agreement
with Wachovia Bank, National Association (the January 2009
Financing). Certain stockholders of the Company purchased
an aggregate of $5.9 million in participation interests
from Wachovia Bank, National Association in connection with the
January 2009 Financing. These participation interests allowed
each holder to participate to the extent of such holders
percentage share in the $10.0 million Loan and Security
Agreement and bore interest at a rate equal to Wachovia
Banks prime rate from time to time plus 10%.
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda, Belmont, McQuilkin, Warnock and
Fortino (either individually or through an affiliated entity)
and Murphy Alternative Investments, LLC purchased an aggregate
of $3.2 million in participation interests from Wachovia
Bank on January 7, 2009. All amounts owed to the holders of
the participation interests were either paid in full or were
rolled over into an equivalent amount of our 2011 Notes on
December 30, 2009. The following table sets forth certain
information regarding such persons ownership of the
participation interests in the January 2009 Financing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Principal
|
|
Rolled
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount Owned
|
|
Paid in
|
|
Over Into the
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Invested
|
|
in 2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2011 Notes
|
|
2009
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
39,308
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
39,308
|
|
Rick E. Belmont
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
13,103
|
|
Malcolm
McQuilkin(1)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
65,614
|
|
David L.
Warnock(2)
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
131,028
|
|
Edward A.
Fortino(3)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
65,514
|
|
Murphy Alternative Investments, LLC
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,514
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consisted of $300,000 in
participation interests held by the Malcolm McQuilkin Living
Trust. Mr. McQuilkin is a co-trustee of the Malcolm
McQuilkin Living Trust.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consisted of $960,100 in
participation interests held by Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P. and $39,900 in participation interests held
by Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock is the managing member of the general
partner of both Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consisted of $500,000 in
participation interests held by the Edward A. Fortino Revocable
Trust UAD 12/15/1994. Mr. Fortino is trustee of the
Edward A. Fortino Revocable Trust UAD 12/15/1994.
|
Sale of
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants
Messrs. Prim, Castaneda, Belmont, Boydston, Dupree,
McQuilkin, Warnock, Ergen and Duchossois (either individually or
through an affiliated entity) and Murphy Alternative
Investments, LLC purchased an aggregate of 9,323,643 shares
of Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 89,351 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $20.66 per share in private placement
transactions between December 14, 2007 and May 20,
2008. In October 2010, our board of directors agreed to reduce
the exercise price of the warrants to purchase shares of common
stock issued in connection with the Series C convertible
preferred stock from $20.66 to $13.04. We issued a total of
12,520,001 shares of Series C convertible preferred
stock and warrants to purchase
89
119,980 shares of common stock during in connection with
these private placement transactions. The following table sets
forth certain information regarding such persons ownership
of those shares and warrants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Paid for
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Shares and
|
|
Name
|
|
Purchased (#)
|
|
|
Purchased (#)
|
|
|
Warrants ($)
|
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
512,363
|
|
|
|
4,910
|
|
|
|
1,229,671
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
116,696
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
280,070
|
|
Rick E.
Belmont(1)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
Brent C. Boydston
|
|
|
16,666
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
39,998
|
|
David W.
Dupree(2)
|
|
|
4,281,250
|
|
|
|
41,028
|
|
|
|
10,275,000
|
|
Malcolm
McQuilkin(3)
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
David L.
Warnock(4)
|
|
|
833,334
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
2,000,002
|
|
Charles Ergen
|
|
|
2,083,334
|
|
|
|
19,965
|
|
|
|
5,000,002
|
|
Craig J.
Duchossois(5)
|
|
|
833,333
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
1,999,999
|
|
Murphy Alternative Investments, LLC
|
|
|
416,667
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of:
(a) 10,000 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 96 shares of
common stock purchased by Mr. Belmonts spouse;
(b) 10,000 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 96 shares of
common stock purchased by Mr. Belmonts son; and
(c) 10,000 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 96 shares of
common stock purchased by Mr. Belmonts daughter.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Dupree served as a member of
the Board of Directors of the Company until May 18, 2011.
Consists of 4,281,250 shares of Series C convertible
preferred stock and warrants to purchase 41,028 shares of
common stock purchased by Primo Investors, L.P. Mr. Dupree
is the managing member of GenPar Primo, L.L.C., the general
partner of Primo Investors, L.P. Mr. Dupree disclaims
beneficial ownership of the Series C convertible preferred
stock and warrants owned by Primo Investors, L.P. except to the
extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of 200,000 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants to
purchase 1,917 shares of common stock purchased by the
Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust. Mr. McQuilkin is a
co-trustee of the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of 800,084 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants to
purchase 7,667 shares of common stock purchased by Camden
Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. and 33,250 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants to
purchase 319 shares of common stock purchased by Camden
Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock is the managing member of the general
partner of both Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock disclaims beneficial ownership of the
Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants owned by
Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. and Camden
Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of 833,333 shares of
Series C convertible preferred stock and warrants to
purchase 7,986 shares of common stock purchased by Craig J.
Duchossois Revocable Trust UAD 9/11/1989.
Mr. Duchossois is trustee of the Craig J. Duchossois
Revocable Trust UAD 9/11/1989.
|
PWC
Leasing, LLC
On March 29, 2006 we entered into a Master Equipment Lease
Agreement with PWC Leasing, LLC (the Lease
Agreement), pursuant to which we leased certain equipment
used in our water bottle exchange service. Primier, LLC, a
company wholly-owned by Mr. Prim, was a one third owner of
PWC Leasing, LLC. We made payments to PWC Leasing, LLC pursuant
to the Lease Agreement that totaled approximately $693,000 and
$318,000 in 2007 and the first six months of 2008, respectively.
On June 30, 2008, we purchased the leased assets from PWC
Leasing, LLC at their fair value of $3,500,000 and terminated
the Lease Agreement. Our Board of Directors authorized and
approved this transaction after obtaining an independent,
third-party evaluation of a fair and reasonable price for the
assets.
Spin-Off
of Prima Bottled Water, Inc. and Related Transactions
On December 31, 2009, we distributed all of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Prima Bottle Water, Inc. (Prima), to all
of the holders of our Series A and Series C
convertible preferred stock and common stock on a pro rata basis
assuming the conversion of all Series A and Series C
convertible preferred stock into common stock (the
Spin-Off). Recipients of the Prima shares included
our directors, officers and holders of more than five percent of
our voting securities, but only in direct proportion to each
individuals ownership of our Series A and
Series C preferred stock and common stock at the time of
the Spin-Off. An aggregate of 57,950,457 shares of Prima
common stock were issued pursuant to the Spin-Off, approximately
90
85.6% of which were issued to our directors, executive officers
and holders of greater than 10% of any of our common stock,
Series A or Series C convertible preferred stock or
Series B preferred stock.
The business purpose of the Spin-Off was to divest the Company
of certain of its non-core assets and operations related to the
sale of bottled water in single-serve containers. The
Companys strategic focus had shifted since it had
originally determined to pursue this line of business and
management of the Company did not believe that it was
appropriate for the Company to divert further time, energy or
resources to the sale of bottled water in single-serve
containers. The Company believed the Spin-Off would allow the
management of each of its businesses to focus solely on its
particular business and would permit Prima to pursue certain
strategic relationships that it could not otherwise pursue as a
subsidiary of the Company.
The shares of Prima common stock were not registered under the
Securities Act and may not have been exempt from its
registration requirements. While we believe the Spin-Off was
conducted in accordance with applicable securities laws, it is
possible that a third party could assert that the Spin-Off did
not comply with Section 5 of the Securities Act and
corresponding provisions of applicable state securities laws. If
we failed to comply with the registration requirements of
Section 5 of the Securities Act and these state securities
laws, the Securities and Exchange Commission and state
securities regulators could impose monetary fines or other
sanctions. In addition, the holders of Prima common stock could
have rescission rights. Based upon facts known to us at this
time, we do not believe the assertion of any such claims is
likely or, if any such claims were asserted, that such claims
would result in a material adverse effect on the Company or its
financial condition.
On March 15, 2010, we entered into a license agreement with
Prima pursuant to which we license the
Prima®
trademark to Prima in exchange for a license fee based upon the
number of bottles manufactured from bioresin by Prima, an
affiliate of Prima and certain third parties. This fee is the
only compensation payable pursuant to the license agreement and
we expect the total fee to be less than $10,000 for 2010.
Messrs. Prim and Castaneda are the sole directors of Prima.
In addition Mr. Castaneda serves as treasurer of Prima and
David Mills, our controller and treasurer, serves as secretary
of Prima. Messrs. Prim, Castaneda and Mills devote
substantially all of their business time and efforts to their
responsibilities as officers of the Company and do not devote
significant time to their activities as officers of Prima.
Primas other officers were employees of the Company prior
to the Spin-Off.
91
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Prima
common stock issued to our executive officers, directors and
beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of
|
Directors and executive officers
|
|
Prima Common Stock Issued (#)
|
|
Billy D.
Prim(1)
|
|
|
16,358,737
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
David W.
Dupree(2)
|
|
|
8,220,000
|
|
Malcolm
McQuilkin(3)
|
|
|
1,384,000
|
|
David L.
Warnock(4)
|
|
|
4,600,001
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
274,056
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Richard E.
Belmont(5)
|
|
|
57,600
|
|
Brent C. Boydston
|
|
|
291,999
|
|
5% or greater
stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
Primo Investors, L.P.
|
|
|
8,220,000
|
|
Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
|
|
|
4,416,461
|
|
Andrew J. Filipowski Holdings
|
|
|
5,900,000
|
|
Craig J. Duchossois Revocable Trust
|
|
|
4,474,999
|
|
Charles Ergen
|
|
|
4,000,001
|
|
Edward A. Fortino Trust
|
|
|
2,875,000
|
|
Murphy Alternative Investments, LLC
|
|
|
800,001
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 16,308,737 shares issued to Mr. Prim
directly; and (b) 50,000 shares issued to
Mr. Prims spouse.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Dupree served as a member
of the Board of Directors of the Company until May 18,
2011. Consists of 8,220,000 shares issued to Primo
Investors, L.P. Mr. Dupree is the managing member of GenPar
Primo, L.L.C., the general partner of Primo Investors, L.P.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of 1,384,000 shares
issued to the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust. Mr. McQuilkin
is a co-trustee of the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 4,416,461 shares issued to Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III, L.P.; and (b) 183,540 shares
issued to Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Mr. Warnock is the managing member of the general
partner of both Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.
and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 19,200 shares issued to Mr. Belmonts
spouse; (b) 19,200 shares issued to
Mr. Belmonts son; and (c) 19,200 shares
issued to Mr. Belmonts daughter.
|
Purchase
of Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement with Culligan Canada and Culligan International,
pursuant to which we purchased certain of Culligan Canadas
assets related to its bulk water exchange business currently
conducted in Canada (the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business). The consideration paid for the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business was approximately $5.4 million,
which consisted of a cash payment of approximately
$1.6 million and the issuance of 307,217 shares of our
common stock, and the assumption of certain specified
liabilities. The Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business provides
refill and delivery of water in 18-liter containers to
commercial retailers in Canada for resale to consumers. After
the closing of this transaction, Culligan International was the
holder of 2,894,717 shares of our common stock,
representing approximately 14.9% of our then outstanding common
stock.
Disgorgement
Agreement
As described above, the Company issued 307,217 shares of
its common stock (the Culligan Shares) to Culligan
International on March 8, 2011 as payment of a portion of
the purchase price for the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business.
Any profits realized by Culligan International upon the sale of
up to 307,217 shares of common stock prior to
September 7, 2011 are recoverable by the Company under
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). In recognition of
Section 16(b)s requirements, the Company and Culligan
92
International entered into a Disgorgement Agreement dated as of
May 12, 2011 pursuant to which Culligan International
agreed that it will pay the Company the full amount of any
profits its realizes as a result of the sale of
307,217 shares of common stock in this offering, less
direct transaction expenses, all in accordance with
Section 16(b).
The Disgorgement Agreement provides that Culligan will pay to
the Company at closing of the offering, if such closing occurs
prior to September 7, 2011, an amount equal to (a) the
proceeds payable to Culligan from the sale of up to
307,217 shares in the offering (less direct transaction
expenses) minus (b) $3,819,079 (but only to the extent the
foregoing calculation results in a positive number). The
Disgorgement Agreement further provides that it is not intended
to limit Culligan Internationals obligations or
liabilities under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and
that, if Culligan International sells additional shares of
common stock after the closing of the offering and prior to
September 7, 2011 and realizes additional profits within
the meaning Section 16(b), it will disgorge any such
additional profits to the Company as and in the manner required
by Section 16(b).
Culligan International will not realize any profit on the sale
of shares of common stock in this offering unless the offering
price is greater than approximately $13.34 per share. Based upon
an assumed offering price of $13.15 per share (which was the
last reported sale price of our common stock on June 7,
2011), Culligan International would not realize any profits and
would not be required to disgorge any profits to us. Based upon
a hypothetical offering price of $14.00 per share, we estimate
that Culligan International would disgorge approximately
$192,000 to the Company in connection with this offering. This
hypothetical amount to be disgorged is calculated by reference
to Culligan Internationals gross proceeds from the sale of
such 307,217 shares in this offering at such hypothetical
$14.00 per share price (approximately $4,301,000) less its
direct transaction expenses (approximately $290,000 consisting
of the underwriting discount and legal fees and expenses
directly related to the offering) less its purchase price for
such shares (approximately $3,819,000).
93
PRINCIPAL
AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of May 26, 2011, and as
adjusted to reflect the shares of common stock to be issued and
sold in this offering, by (i) each of our named executive
officers; (ii) each of our directors; (iii) all of our
directors and current executive officers as a group;
(iv) each person or group of affiliated persons known by us
to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;
and (v) our other selling stockholders selling shares in
this offering.
Beneficial ownership in this table is determined in accordance
with the rules of the SEC and does not necessarily indicate
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules,
the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes
shares issuable upon exercise of options, warrants and other
rights held by the respective person or group that may be
exercised within 60 days after May 26, 2011. For
purposes of calculating each persons or groups
percentage ownership, options, warrants and other rights
exercisable within 60 days after May 26, 2011 are
included for that person or group.
Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on
19,932,181 shares of common stock outstanding as of
May 26, 2011 and 23,353,550 shares of common stock
outstanding after completion of this offering (or
23,683,494 shares if the underwriters exercise in full
their option to purchase additional shares to cover
over-allotments, if any). Except as noted, and subject to
community property laws where applicable, we believe that the
stockholders named in the table below have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock
shown as beneficially owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated
in the notes below, the address for each of the individuals
listed below is
c/o Primo
Water Corporation, 104 Cambridge Plaza Drive, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina 27104.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership After this Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
Owned After the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned After
|
|
|
Completion of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Completion of the
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
(Assuming
|
|
|
Full
|
|
|
Full
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
of Over-
|
|
|
of Over-
|
|
|
of Over-
|
|
|
Over-
|
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned Prior to this Offering
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
|
Allotment
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Offered(1)
|
|
|
Option)
|
|
|
Option)
|
|
|
Option)
|
|
|
Option)
|
|
|
Executive Officers and Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billy D. Prim
|
|
|
2,493,668
|
(2)
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,493,668
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
2,493,668
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Richard A. Brenner
|
|
|
60,412
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,412
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
60,412
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jack C. Kilgore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm McQuilkin
|
|
|
205,807
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,807
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
205,807
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David L. Warnock
|
|
|
699,090
|
(5)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699,090
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
699,090
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Richard E. Belmont
|
|
|
37,261
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,261
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
37,261
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark Castaneda
|
|
|
77,137
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,137
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
77,137
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Duane Goodwin
|
|
|
9,583
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael S. Gunter
|
|
|
41,241
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,255
|
|
|
|
33,986
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
33,986
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Directors and current executive officers as a group (7
individuals)
|
|
|
3,577,355
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
7,255
|
|
|
|
3,570,100
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
3,570,100
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
5% or Greater Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Culligan International Company
|
|
|
2,894,717
|
(10)
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
2,324,661
|
|
|
|
570,056
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAMCO INC.
|
|
|
1,037,000
|
(11)
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,037,000
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
1,037,000
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Other Selling Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew J.
Filipowski(12)
|
|
|
251,174
|
(13)
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
124,500
|
(14)
|
|
|
126,674
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
126,674
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Carl V.
Santoiemmo(15)
|
|
|
501,080
|
(16)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
122,215
|
|
|
|
378,865
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
378,865
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents beneficial ownership of
less than 1.0%.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents shares offered hereby
and assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option. We and a selling stockholder have granted the
underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 900,000
shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any.
|
94
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 2,237,056 shares of common stock held directly
(419,705 of which are pledged as security);
(b) 146,889 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held directly that are presently
exercisable (4,218 of which are pledged as security);
(c) 42,645 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options held directly that are presently
exercisable or become exercisable within the next 60 days;
(d) 4,791 shares of common stock held by BD Prim, LLC
(as to which he has shared voting and investment power);
(e) 4,791 shares held by the Billy D. Prim Revocable
Trust (as to which he has shared voting and investment power);
(f) 23,957 shares of common stock held by 2010
Irrevocable Trust fbo Sarcanda W. Bellissimo (as to which he has
shared voting and investment power); (g) 23,957 shares
of common stock held by 2010 Irrevocable Trust fbo Anthony Gray
Westmoreland (as to which he has shared voting and investment
power); (h) 4,791 shares of common stock held by the
2010 Irrevocable Trust fbo Jager Grayln Dean Bellissimo (as to
which he has shared voting and investment power); and
(i) 4,791 shares of common stock held by the 2010
Irrevocable Trust fbo Joseph Alexander Bellissimo (as to which
he has shared voting and investment power). Excludes
8,032 shares of common stock and 1,791 shares of our
common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held
directly by Deborah W. Prim, Mr. Prims spouse.
Mr. Prim is the sole member and sole manager of BD Prim,
LLC. Mr. Prim is the sole trustee of each of the
(i) Billy D. Prim Revocable Trust, (ii) 2010
Irrevocable Trust fbo Sarcanda W. Bellissimo, (iii) 2010
Irrevocable Trust fbo Anthony Gray Westmoreland, (iv) 2010
Irrevocable Trust fbo Jager Grayln Dean Bellissimo, and
(v) 2010 Irrevocable Trust fbo Joseph Alexander Bellissimo.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 50,863 shares of common stock held directly, which
includes 3,832 shares of restricted common stock over which
Mr. Brenner has voting but not investment power;
(b) 6,965 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held directly that are presently
exercisable; (c) 2,300 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of options held directly that are presently
exercisable; (d) 142 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of warrants held by the ALB-3 Trust, of which
he is the sole trustee, that are presently exercisable; and
(e) 142 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held by the ALB-5 Trust, of which he is the
sole trustee, that are presently exercisable. Mr. Brenner
may be deemed to have voting and investment power with respect
to securities held by the ALB-3 Trust or the ALB-5 Trust and
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such securities,
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein, if any.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 5,749 shares of common stock held directly, which
includes 3,832 shares of restricted common stock over which
Mr. McQuilkin has voting but not investment power;
(b) 10,733 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of options held directly that are presently
exercisable; (c) 157,858 shares of common stock held
by the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust; and
(d) 31,467 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held by the Malcolm McQuilkin Living Trust
that are presently exercisable. Mr. McQuilkin and Sheri
McQuilkin are the co-trustees of the Malcolm McQuilkin Living
Trust and as such, Mr. McQuilkin may be deemed to have
shared voting and investment power with respect to such shares.
Mr. McQuilkin expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of
any such securities held in the trust, except to the extent of
his pecuniary interest therein, if any.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 5,749 shares of common stock held directly, which
includes 3,832 shares of restricted common stock over which
Mr. Warnock has voting but not investment power;
(b) 2,300 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of options held directly that are presently
exercisable; (c) 569,380 shares of common stock held
by Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P.;
(d) 94,088 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held by Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P. that are presently exercisable;
(e) 23,662 shares of common stock held by Camden
Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P.; and (f) 3,911 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of warrants held by Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. that are presently exercisable. Camden Partners Strategic
III, LLC is the General Partner of Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P. and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. Camden Partners Strategic Manager, LLC is the Managing
Member of Camden Partners Strategic III, LLC. David L. Warnock,
Donald W. Hughes and Richard M. Berkeley are the Managing
Members of Camden Partners Strategic Manager, LLC.
Mr. Warnock may be deemed to have voting and investment
power with respect to all securities beneficially owned by both
Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. and Camden
Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. In addition, all securities of the Company that are issued
directly to Mr. Warnock are held for the benefit of Camden
Partners Holdings, LLC, the Managing Members of which are
Messrs. Warnock, Hughes and Berkeley. Mr. Warnock
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such securities
held by Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. and Camden
Partners Strategic Fund III-A, L.P. except to the extent of his
pecuniary interest therein, if any. In addition,
Mr. Warnock similarly expressly disclaims beneficial
ownership of all securities held for the benefit of Camden
Partners Holdings, LLC except to the extent of his pecuniary
interest therein, if any.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 14,374 shares of common stock held directly, which
includes 9,582 shares of restricted common stock over which
Mr. Belmont has voting but not investment power;
(b) 710 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held directly that are presently
exercisable; (c) shares issuable upon the exercise of
options to purchase 15,892 shares of common stock held
directly that are presently exercisable;
(d) 1,999 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Belmonts spouse; (e) 96 shares of
common stock shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants held
by Mr. Belmonts spouse that are presently
exercisable; (f) 1,999 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Belmonts son; (g) 96 shares of common
stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by
Mr. Belmonts son that are presently exercisable;
(h) 1,999 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Belmonts daughter; and (i) 96 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by
Mr. Belmonts daughter that are presently exercisable.
Mr. Belmont may be deemed to have voting and investment
power with respect to securities held by his spouse or children
and expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of any such
securities, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest
therein, if any.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 54,402 shares of common stock held directly, which
includes 15,971 shares of restricted common stock over
which Mr. Castaneda has voting but not investment power;
(b) 4,527 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held directly that are presently
exercisable; and (c) 18,208 shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of options held directly that are
presently exercisable.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Consists of 9,583 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of options held directly
that are presently exercisable.
|
95
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 16,837 shares of common stock held directly, which
includes 9,582 shares of restricted common stock over which
Mr. Gunter has voting but not investment power;
(b) 302 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants held directly that are presently
exercisable; and (c) 24,102 shares of common stock
issuable upon the exercise of options held directly that are
presently exercisable.
|
|
(10)
|
|
All of the shares are owned
directly by Culligan International Company, which has the sole
power to vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition of the
shares. Culligan International Company is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Culligan Holding Inc., which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Culligan Holding Company B.V., which is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Culligan Holding S.àr.l., which
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Culligan International
S.àr.l., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Culligan
Investments S.àr.l., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Culligan Ltd. Each of such entities may be deemed to share power
to vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition of the
shares owned by Culligan International Company. Clayton,
Dubilier & Rice Fund VI Limited Partnership owns
approximately 77.8% of the outstanding voting securities of
Culligan Ltd. CD&R Associates VI Limited Partnership is the
general partner of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice
Fund VI Limited Partnership, and CD&R Investment
Associates VI, Inc. is the general partner of CD&R
Associates VI Limited Partnership. Each of CD&R Associates
VI Limited Partnership and CD&R Investment Associates VI,
Inc. (i) may, by reason of such relationships, be deemed to
share the power to vote and to dispose or to direct the
disposition of the shares held by Culligan International Company
and deemed beneficially owned by Culligan Holding Inc., Culligan
Holding Company B.V., Culligan Holding S.àr.l., Culligan
International S.àr.l., Culligan Investments S.àr.l.,
and Culligan Ltd. (such entities, collectively with Culligan
International Company, the Culligan Entities), but
(ii) expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
held or deemed to be beneficially owned by the Culligan
Entities. CD&R Investment Associates VI, Inc. is managed by
a board of directors whose current members are
Michael G. Babiarz, James G. Berges, Kevin J. Conway,
Thomas C. Franco, Kenneth A. Giuriceo, Donald J. Gogel, Manfred
Kindle, George K. Jaquette, Edward M. Liddy, David A. Novak,
Roberto Quarta, Joseph L. Rice, III, Christian Rochat,
Richard J. Schnall, Nathan Sleeper, George W. Tamke
and David H. Wasserman. All action by the board of directors of
CD&R Investment Associates VI, Inc. relating to the voting
or disposition of these shares requires approval of a majority
of the board. As a result, no member of the board of CD&R
Investment Associates VI, Inc. controls the voting or
disposition of CD&R Investment Associates VI, Inc. with
respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned by Culligan
International Company, the other Culligan Entities, Clayton,
Dubilier & Rice Fund VI Limited Partnership,
CD&R Associates VI Limited Partnership or CD&R
Investment Associates VI, Inc., and each of the members of the
board of CD&R Investment Associates VI, Inc. expressly
disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. Culligan
International Companys address is 9399 West Higgins
Road, Suite 1100, Rosemont, Illinois 60018. Culligan
International Company acquired its shares in connection with the
Companys November 10, 2010 purchase of its water
bottle refill business and the March 8, 2011 purchase of
its bulk water exchange business. See Business
Company Background and Recent
Developments Purchase of Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business.
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
This information is derived from a
Schedule 13G filed jointly by BAMCO INC., Baron Capital
Group, Inc., Baron Small Cap Fund and Ronald Baron on
February 14, 2011. All of the shares are held by Baron
Small Cap Fund. BAMCO, Inc. serves as sole investment adviser to
Baron Small Cap Fund and has voting and dispositive power with
respect to all such shares. BAMCO INC. is a subsidiary of Baron
Capital Group, Inc. Ronald Baron owns a controlling interest in
Baron Capital Group, Inc. By reason of such relationships, each
entity or person may be deemed to have shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to all such shares. The address
for BAMCO INC. is 767 Fifth Avenue, 49th Floor, New York,
New York 10153.
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions for descriptions of previous
transactions between the Company and Mr. Filipowski.
Mr. Filipowskis business address is 50 E.
Chestnut #3301, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
Consists of (a) shares
issuable upon the exercise of options to purchase 2,013 shares
of common stock; (b) 124,581 shares of common stock held by
the Andrew J. Filipowski Revocable Trust (the sole trustee
of which is Andrew J. Filipowski); (c) 28,749 shares of
common stock held by the Robinwood Gift Trust (the sole trustee
of which is Matthew G. Roszak); and (d) 95,831 shares of
common stock held by the Filipowski Foundation (the directors
and executive officers of which are Andrew J. Filipowski,
Matthew G. Roszak and Melissa Oliver).
|
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
Consists of shares held by the
Andrew J. Filipowski Revocable Trust.
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
Carl V. Santoiemmo is a member
of Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC and acquired his shares in a
pro rata distribution from Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC in
May 2011. Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC acquired its
shares on April 11, 2011 in connection with the
Companys purchase of its single-serve beverage business.
See Recent Developments Purchase of Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business. Mr. Santoiemmos
business address is 93 Alpha Park Drive, Highland Heights, Ohio
44143.
|
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
Consists of
(a) 122,215 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Santoiemmo directly and (b) 378,865 shares of
common stock held by Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC of which
Mr. Santoiemmo may be deemed to beneficially own by virtue
of his status as the sole manager of Omnifrio Beverage Company,
LLC.
|
96
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following is a description of the material provisions of
our capital stock, as well as other material terms of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended
and restated bylaws. This description is only a summary. For
more detailed information, you should refer to our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated
bylaws which have been filed with the SEC. Please see
Where You Can Find More Information in this
prospectus.
Authorized
Capital
Our authorized capital stock consists of
(1) 70,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par
value per share and (2) 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.001 per share. At the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders on May 18, 2011, our stockholders approved the
amendment and restatement of our certificate of incorporation to
eliminate references to shares of preferred stock that were
issued and outstanding prior to our initial public offering and
to reduce our authorized shares of preferred stock from
65,000,000 shares to 10,000,000 shares. As of
May 26, 2011, there were 19,932,181 shares of common
stock and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common
Stock
Voting. Except as otherwise required by Delaware
law, at every annual or special meeting of stockholders, every
holder of common stock is entitled to one vote per share. There
is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.
Dividend Rights. Subject to preferences that may be
applicable to any outstanding series of preferred stock, the
holders of our common stock will receive ratably any dividends
declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally
available for the payment of dividends. We have never paid or
declared cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend
to retain all available funds and any future earnings to finance
the development and expansion of our business. We do not expect
to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon
various factors, including our results of operations, financial
condition, capital requirements, investment opportunities and
other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Liquidation and Preemptive Rights. In the event of
our liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up,
the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in
all assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to
prior distribution rights of our preferred stock, if any, then
outstanding. The holders of our common stock have no preemptive
or other subscription rights.
Our outstanding shares of common stock are, and the shares
offered by us in this offering will be, when issued and paid
for, fully paid and nonassessable. The rights, preferences and
privileges of holders of common stock are subject to, and may be
adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of
any series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in
the future.
Preferred
Stock
Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue from time to time
shares of preferred stock in one or more series without
stockholder approval. Our Board of Directors has the discretion
to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions, including voting rights, dividend rights,
conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation
preferences, of each series of preferred stock. It is not
possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any
shares of preferred stock on the rights of holders of common
stock until our Board of Directors determines the specific
rights associated with that preferred stock. Although we have no
current plans to issue shares of preferred stock, the effects of
issuing preferred stock could include one or more of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
decreasing the amount of earnings and assets available for
distribution to holders of common stock;
|
|
|
restricting dividends on the common stock;
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the common stock;
|
|
|
impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; or
|
|
|
delaying, deferring or preventing changes in our control or
management.
|
97
We believe that the ability of our Board of Directors to issue
one or more series of preferred stock will provide us with
flexibility in structuring possible future financings and
acquisitions, and in meeting other corporate needs that may
arise. The authorized shares of preferred stock, as well as
authorized and unissued shares of common stock, will be
available for issuance without action by our stockholders,
unless such action is required by applicable law or the rules of
any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our
securities may be listed or traded.
Our Board of Directors may authorize, without stockholder
approval, the issuance of preferred stock with voting and
conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power
and other rights of holders of common stock. Although our Board
of Directors has no current intention of doing so, it could
issue a series of preferred stock that could, depending on the
terms of such series, impede the completion of a merger, tender
offer or other takeover attempt of our Company. Our Board of
Directors could also issue preferred stock having terms that
could discourage an acquisition attempt through which an
acquirer may be able to change the composition of our Board of
Directors, including a tender offer or other transaction that
some, or a majority, of our stockholders might believe to be in
their best interests or in which stockholders might receive a
premium for their stock over the then-current market price. Any
issuance of preferred stock therefore could have the effect of
decreasing the market price of our common stock.
Our Board of Directors will make any determination to issue such
shares based on its judgment as to the best interests of our
Company and its stockholders. We have no current plan to issue
any preferred stock after this offering.
Stock
Options, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
As of May 26, 2011, we have outstanding options to purchase
a total of 475,761 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $12.87 per share. Of this total,
295,586 options have vested and 180,175 remained unvested. As of
May 26, 2011, we have also have outstanding
68,823 shares of restricted stock, all of which are
unvested, and 82,568 restricted stock units that are to be
settled in shares of our common stock. As of May 26, 2011,
an additional 457,441 shares of common stock were available
for future awards under our 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive
Plan.
Warrants
As of May 26, 2011, we have issued warrants to purchase a
total of 846,393 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $12.51 per share.
Warrants to purchase a total of 130,747 shares of our
common stock expire in either December 2019 or October 2020 and
have an exercise price of $9.60 per share.
Warrants to purchase a total of 595,666 shares of our
common stock expire between April 28, 2016 and
January 10, 2017 and have an exercise price of $13.04 per
share
Warrants to purchase a total of 119,980 shares of our
common stock expire between December 14, 2017 and
June 2, 2018 and have an exercise price of $13.04 per share.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions
Delaware law, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws contain
provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of
our Company or changes in our Board of Directors that our
stockholders might consider favorable. The following is a
summary of these provisions.
Delaware
Law
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. Section 203 generally prohibits a public
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business
combination with an interested stockholder for
a period of three years after the date of the transaction in
which the person became an interested stockholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of
the corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
upon the consummation of the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding (a) shares
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
owned by persons who are directors and also officers, and
(b) shares owned by employee stock plans in which employee
participants do not have the right to determine confidentially
whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a
tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business
combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized
at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by
written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds
of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Section 203 defines a business combination to include:
|
|
|
|
|
any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, transfer, pledge or other
disposition involving the interested stockholder of 10% or more
of the assets of the corporation;
|
|
|
subject to exceptions, any transaction that results in the
issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the
corporation to the interested stockholder; and
|
|
|
the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any
loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits
provided by or through the corporation.
|
In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder
as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of the corporation and any entity or
person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by the
entity or person.
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended
and Restated Bylaws
Undesignated Preferred Stock. Our Board of Directors
has the ability to issue preferred stock with voting or other
rights, preferences and privileges that could have the effect of
deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control of
our Company or management.
Limits on Ability to Act by Written Consent or Call a Special
Meeting. We have provided in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws
that, in most circumstances, our stockholders may not act by
written consent. This limit on the ability of our stockholders
to act by written consent may, in the future, lengthen the
amount of time required to take stockholder actions. As a
result, a holder controlling a majority of our capital stock
would not be able to amend our certificate of incorporation or
bylaws or remove directors without holding a meeting of our
stockholders called in accordance with our amended and restated
bylaws.
In addition, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that
special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by our
Board of Directors. A stockholder may not call a special
meeting, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to
force consideration of a proposal or for holders controlling a
majority of our capital stock to take any action, including the
removal of directors.
Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder
Nominations and Proposals. Our amended and restated bylaws
establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder
proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as
directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of
our Board of Directors or a committee of our Board of Directors.
Stockholders must notify our corporate secretary in writing
prior to the meeting at which the matters are to be acted upon
or directors are to be elected. The notice must contain the
information specified in our amended and restated bylaws. To be
timely, the notice must be received at our principal executive
office not later than the 90th day nor earlier than the
120th day prior to the first anniversary of the date of the
prior years annual meeting of stockholders. If the date of
the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or after
such anniversary date, or if no annual meeting was held in the
preceding year, notice by the stockholder, to be timely, must be
received not earlier than the 120th day prior to the annual
meeting, and not later than the later of the 90th day prior
to the annual meeting, or the 10th day following the day on
which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first
made or notice of the meeting date is mailed, whichever occurs
first.
Our amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of
precluding the conduct of certain business at a meeting if the
proper procedures are not followed. These provisions may also
discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a
solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirers own slate
of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our
Company.
99
Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may elect
a director to fill a vacancy, including vacancies created by the
expansion of our Board of Directors.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the
amended and restated bylaws do not provide for cumulative voting
in the election of directors. The absence of cumulative voting
may make it more difficult for stockholders who own an aggregate
of less than a majority of our voting power to elect any
directors to our Board of Directors.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the
amended and restated bylaws provide that our Board of Directors
is divided into three classes, with members of each class
serving staggered three-year terms. Our classified Board of
Directors could have the effect of delaying or discouraging an
acquisition of us or a change in management.
Limitations
of Directors Liability and Indemnification
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation limits the
liability of our directors to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors of a
corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages
for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except for
liability for any:
|
|
|
|
|
breach of their duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;
|
|
|
act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
unlawful payment of dividends or redemption of shares as
provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law; or
|
|
|
transaction from which the directors derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
These limitations of liability do not apply to liabilities
arising under federal securities laws and do not affect the
availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or
rescission.
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify
and advance expenses to our directors and officers to the
fullest extent permitted by law or, if applicable, pursuant to
indemnification agreements. They further provide that we may
choose to indemnify other employees or agents of the corporation
from time to time. Section 145(g) of the Delaware General
Corporation Law and our amended and restated bylaws also permit
us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director,
employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or
her actions in connection with his or her services to us,
regardless of whether our bylaws permit indemnification. We have
obtained a directors and officers liability
insurance policy.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
directors that provide, in general, that we will indemnify them
to the fullest extent permitted by law in connection with their
service to us or on our behalf.
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding
involving any of our directors or officers as to which
indemnification is required or permitted, and we are not aware
of any threatened litigation or proceeding that may result in a
claim for indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and
controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission this indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is
therefore unenforceable.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.
Stock
Market
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol PRMW.
100
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of
shares of our common stock or the availability of shares of our
common stock for sale will have on the market price of our
common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial
amounts of our common stock in the public market, including
shares issued upon exercise of outstanding equity awards, or the
anticipation of these sales, could adversely affect the market
prices of our common stock and could impair our future ability
to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.
Upon completion of this offering, based on our outstanding
shares as of May 26, 2011, we will have outstanding an
aggregate of 23,353,550 shares of our common stock (or
23,683,494 shares if the underwriters over-allotment
option is exercised in full). Of these shares, the
9,583,333 shares sold in our initial public offering and
all of the shares sold in this offering (including any shares
sold as a result of the underwriters exercise of the
over-allotment option) will be freely tradable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act,
unless those shares are purchased by our affiliates as that term
is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Certain of
the remaining shares of common stock to be outstanding after
this offering are restricted securities under
Rule 144. Restricted securities may be sold in the public
market only if they have been registered or if they qualify for
an exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 under
the Securities Act.
Lock-Up
Agreements
In connection with this offering, holders of
6,902,607 shares of our common stock and holders of
740,543 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of outstanding equity awards, including in each case all of our
officers and directors and the selling stockholders, have
entered into
lock-up
agreements pursuant to which they have agreed, subject to
limited exceptions, not to offer, sell or otherwise transfer or
dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock
or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable
for shares of common stock for a period of 90 days from the
date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated. Culligan
Internationals
lock-up
agreement is subject to early termination on July 15, 2011
if a registration statement for an underwritten public offering
providing for the sale by Culligan International of at least
2,200,000 shares of our common stock (and the sale of the
first 694,717 shares in excess of 6,000,000 total shares
sold) (a Qualifying Offering) has not been declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to
July 15, 2011. We have agreed, subject to limited
exceptions, that for a period of 90 days from the date of
this prospectus, we will not, without the prior written consent
of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, offer,
sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of any shares of common
stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable or
exercisable for shares of common stock, except for the shares of
common stock offered in this offering. These
90-day
lock-up
periods will be extended automatically if (i) during the
last 17 days of the
90-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce
material news or a material event or (ii) prior to the
expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
15-day
period following the last day of the
90-day
period, in which case the restrictions described in this
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
announcement of the material news or material event. Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated may, in its sole
discretion and at any time without notice, release all or any
portion of the securities subject to the
lock-up
agreements. After the applicable lock-up periods, all shares
subject to lock-up agreements may be sold, subject to applicable
securities laws. See Underwriting.
In addition, 256,651 shares that were issued in connection
with our acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage
Business are subject to
lock-up
restrictions that expire April 11, 2013.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for
purposes of the Securities Act at any time during the
90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the
shares proposed to be sold for at least six months, including
the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates,
is entitled to sell those shares without complying with the
manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of
Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information
requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially
owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year,
including the holding period of
101
any prior owner other than our affiliates, then that person is
entitled to sell those shares without complying with any of the
requirements of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our
affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates
are entitled to sell upon expiration of the
lock-up
agreements described above, within any three-month period
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a
number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then
outstanding; or
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on
Form 144 with respect to that sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates are also subject to
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
Equity
Awards
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of our
common stock reserved for issuance under our equity compensation
plans.
Registration
Rights
After the completion of this offering, holders of
948,921 shares of common stock (378,865 shares if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised in full)
will be entitled to specific rights to register those shares for
sale in the public market. Registration of these shares under
the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except
for shares purchased by affiliates, immediately upon the
effectiveness of the registration statement relating to such
shares. In connection with this offering, Culligan International
entered into an amendment to its registration rights agreement
with the Company that provides that a resale registration
statement registering Culligan Internationals shares is
required to be effective no later than (a) July 15,
2011 or (b) if the Company files a registration statement
in connection with a Qualifying Offering which is declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission before
July 15, 2011, the date which is 75 days after the
effective date of that registration statement.
102
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME AND ESTATE TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR NON-U.S.
HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK
The following discussion summarizes certain material
U.S. federal income and estate tax considerations relating
to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common
stock purchased in this offering by a
non-U.S. holder
(as defined below). This discussion is based on the provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, final,
temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury regulations
promulgated thereunder and current administrative rulings and
judicial decisions, all as in effect as of the date hereof. All
of these authorities may be subject to differing interpretations
or repealed, revoked or modified, possibly with retroactive
effect, which could materially alter the tax consequences to
non-U.S. holders
described in this prospectus.
There can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a contrary
position to the tax consequences described herein or that such
position will not be sustained by a court. No ruling from the
IRS has been obtained with respect to the U.S. federal
income or estate tax consequences to a
non-U.S. holder
of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common stock.
This discussion is for general information only and is not
tax advice. All prospective
non-U.S. holders
of our common stock should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to the U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our
common stock.
As used in this discussion, the term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not any of
the following for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or a resident of the United
States;
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes that was created or
organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state
thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source;
|
|
|
a trust (a) if a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of
the trusts substantial decisions or (b) that has a
valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or
|
|
|
an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner for
U.S. federal income tax purposes if all of its interests
are owned by a single person described above.
|
An individual may be treated, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, as a resident of the United States in any calendar
year by being present in the United States on at least
31 days in that calendar year and for an aggregate of at
least 183 days during a three-year period ending in the
current calendar year. The
183-day test
is determined by counting all of the days the individual is
treated as being present in the current year, one-third of such
days in the immediately preceding year and one-sixth of such
days in the second preceding year. Residents are subject to
U.S. federal income tax as if they were U.S. citizens.
This discussion assumes that a prospective
non-U.S. holder
will hold shares of our common stock as a capital asset
(generally, property held for investment). This discussion does
not address all aspects of U.S. federal income and estate
taxation that may be relevant to a particular
non-U.S. holder
in light of that
non-U.S. holders
individual circumstances. In addition, this discussion does not
address any aspect of U.S. federal alternative minimum,
U.S. state or U.S. local or
non-U.S. taxes,
or the special tax rules applicable to particular
non-U.S. holders,
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
insurance companies and financial institutions;
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
partnerships or other pass-through entities;
|
|
|
regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts;
|
|
|
pension plans;
|
|
|
persons who received our common stock as compensation;
|
|
|
brokers and dealers in securities;
|
|
|
owners that hold our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; and
|
|
|
former citizens or residents of the United States subject to tax
as expatriates.
|
103
If a partnership or other entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes is an owner of our common
stock, the treatment of a partner in the partnership generally
will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of
the partnership. We urge any owner of our common stock that is a
partnership and partners in that partnership to consult their
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common
stock.
Distributions
on Our Common Stock
Any distribution on our common stock paid to
non-U.S. holders
will generally constitute a dividend for U.S. federal
income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess
of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will
generally constitute a return of capital to the extent of the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in our common stock, and will be applied
against and reduce the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis. Any remaining excess will be treated as
capital gain, subject to the tax treatment described below in
Gain on Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our
Common Stock.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
that are not treated as effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States generally
will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax
at a rate of 30% on the gross amount paid, unless the
non-U.S. holder
is entitled to an exemption from or reduced rate of withholding
under an applicable income tax treaty. In order to claim the
benefit of a tax treaty, a
non-U.S. holder
must provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or successor form) prior to the payment of dividends. A
non-U.S. holder
eligible for a reduced rate of withholding pursuant to an income
tax treaty may be eligible to obtain a refund of any excess
amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for a
refund with the IRS.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
that are treated as effectively connected with a trade or
business conducted by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and, if an applicable income tax
treaty so provides, are also attributable to a permanent
establishment or a fixed base maintained within the United
States by the
non-U.S. holder)
are generally exempt from the 30% withholding tax if the
non-U.S. holder
satisfies applicable certification and disclosure requirements.
To obtain the exemption, a
non-U.S. holder
must provide us with a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI
(or successor form) prior to the payment of the dividend.
Dividends received by a
non-U.S. holder
that are treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade
or business generally are subject to U.S. federal income
tax at rates applicable to U.S. persons. A
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be
subject to an additional branch profits tax imposed
at a rate of 30%, or such lower rate as specified by an
applicable income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence.
A
non-U.S. holder
who provides us with an IRS
Form W-8BEN,
Form W-8ECI
or other form must update the form or submit a new form, as
applicable, if there is a change in circumstances that makes any
information on such form incorrect.
Gain On
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common
Stock
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax or
withholding on any gain realized from the
non-U.S. holders
sale, exchange or other disposition of shares of our common
stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides,
is also attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed
base maintained within the United States by the
non-U.S. holder),
in which case the gain will be taxed on a net income basis
generally in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a U.S. person, and, if the
non-U.S. holder
is a corporation, the additional branch profits tax described
above in Distributions on Our Common Stock may also
apply;
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition and
certain other conditions are met, in which case the
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to a 30% tax on the net gain derived from the
disposition, which may be offset by
U.S.-source
capital losses of the
non-U.S. holder,
if any; or
|
|
|
we are, or have been at any time during the five-year period
preceding such disposition (or the
non-U.S. holders
holding period, if shorter), a United States real property
holding corporation.
|
104
Generally, we will be a United States real property
holding corporation if the fair market value of our
U.S. real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the
sum of the fair market values of our worldwide real property
interests and other assets used or held for use in a trade or
business, all as determined under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations. We believe that we have not been and are not
currently, and do not anticipate becoming in the future, a
United States real property holding corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
We must report annually to the IRS and to each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of distributions paid to such holder and the amount
of tax withheld, if any. Copies of the information returns filed
with the IRS to report the distributions and withholding may
also be made available to the tax authorities in a country in
which the
non-U.S. holder
is a resident under the provisions of an applicable income tax
treaty or agreement.
The United States imposes a backup withholding tax on the gross
amount of dividends and certain other types of payments.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to backup withholding if proper
certification of foreign status (usually on IRS
Form W-8BEN)
is provided, and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to
know that the
non-U.S. holder
is a U.S. person. In addition, no backup withholding or
information reporting will be required regarding the proceeds of
a disposition of our common stock made by a
non-U.S. holder
within the United States or conducted through certain
U.S. financial intermediaries if the payor receives the
certification of foreign status described in the preceding
sentence and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason
to know that such
non-U.S. holder
is a U.S. person or the
non-U.S. holder
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application
of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to
them.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld
under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
non-U.S. holder
can be refunded or credited against the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
certain required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely
manner.
U.S.
Federal Estate Tax
An individual
non-U.S. holder
who is treated as the owner, or who has made certain lifetime
transfers, of an interest in our common stock will be required
to include the value of the common stock in his or her gross
estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes and may be
subject to U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable
estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
Recently-Enacted
Legislation Relating to Foreign Accounts
Legislation has been recently enacted that imposes significant
certification, information reporting and other requirements on
foreign financial institutions and certain other
non-U.S. entities.
The legislation is generally effective for payments made after
December 31, 2012. The failure to comply with the
certification, information reporting and other specified
requirements in the legislation would result in withholding tax
being imposed on payments of dividends and sales proceeds to
foreign financial institutions and certain other
non-U.S. holders.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisers regarding the application
of this legislation to them.
105
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an underwriting
agreement dated the date of this prospectus, each of the
underwriters named below, for whom Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated is acting as sole-book running manager and
representative, has severally agreed to purchase, the respective
numbers of shares of common stock appearing opposite their names
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Signal Hill Capital Group LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 6,000,000 shares to be purchased by the
underwriters, 3,421,369 shares will be purchased from us
and 2,578,631 shares will be purchased from the selling
stockholders.
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
several underwriters are subject to various conditions,
including approval of legal matters by counsel. The underwriting
agreement provides that the underwriters are obligated to
purchase all the shares of common stock in the offering if any
are purchased, other than those shares covered by the
over-allotment option described below. If an underwriter
defaults, the underwriting agreement provides that the purchase
commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters may be increased
or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to
purchasers on or
about ,
2011.
Over-Allotment
Option
We and Culligan International have granted a
30-day
over-allotment option to the underwriters to purchase up to a
total of 900,000 additional shares of our common stock at the
public offering price, less the underwriting discount payable by
us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. If the
underwriters exercise this option in whole or in part, then each
of the underwriters will be separately committed, subject to the
conditions described in the underwriting agreement, to purchase
the additional shares of our common stock in proportion to their
respective commitments set forth in the table above. The
underwriting agreement provides that if the underwriters
exercise the over-allotment option, the first
570,056 shares purchased will be from Culligan
International and the remaining up to 329,944 shares will
be purchased from the Company.
Commissions
and Discounts
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the public offering price set forth on the cover of
this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to
securities dealers may be sold at that price less a concession
of not more than $ per share from
the public offering price. If all the shares are not sold at the
public offering price, the underwriters may change the offering
price and the other selling terms. The offering of the shares by
the underwriters is subject to receipt and acceptance and
subject to the underwriters right to reject any order in
whole or in part.
The following tables summarize the compensation to be paid to
the underwriters by us and the selling stockholders. Such
amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of
the underwriters option to purchase 900,000 additional
shares from us and a selling stockholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by the selling
stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that the expenses in this offering payable by us,
not including underwriting discounts and commissions, will be
approximately $0.5 million.
Indemnification
of Underwriters
The Underwriting Agreement provides that we and the selling
stockholders will indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and
liabilities arising from breaches of our representations and
warranties contained in the underwriting agreement. If we or the
selling stockholders are unable to provide this indemnification,
we and the selling stockholders will contribute to payments the
underwriters may be required to make in respect of those
liabilities.
No Sales
of Similar Securities
We, our directors and officers, the selling stockholders (other
than Culligan International) and certain other of our
stockholders have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to
offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option to
purchase, make any short sale or otherwise dispose of any shares
of common stock, or any options or warrants to purchase any
shares of common stock, or any securities convertible into,
exchangeable for or that represent the right to receive shares
of common stock without the prior written consent of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated for a period of
90 days after the date of this prospectus. Culligan
International has entered into a similar
90-day
lock-up
agreement that is subject to early termination on July 15,
2011 if a registration statement for an underwritten public
offering providing for the sale by Culligan International of at
least 2,200,000 shares of our common stock (and the sale of
the first 694,717 shares in excess of 6,000,000 total
shares sold) (a Qualifying Offering) has not been
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission
prior to July 15, 2011.
The 90-day
restricted period will be extended automatically if
(i) during the last 17 days of the
90-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or announce
material news or a material event or (ii) prior to the
expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
15-day
period following the last day of the
90-day
period, in which case the restrictions described in this
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
announcement of the material news or material event.
Nasdaq
Global Market Listing
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol PRMW.
Short
Sales, Stabilizing Transactions and Penalty Bids
In order to facilitate this offering, persons participating in
this offering may engage in transactions that stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the price of our common stock
during and after this offering. Specifically, the underwriters
may engage in the following activities in accordance with the
rules of the SEC.
Short sales. Short sales involve the sales by the
underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are
required to purchase in the offering. Covered short sales are
short sales made in an amount not greater than the
underwriters over-allotment option to purchase additional
shares from us and a selling stockholder in this offering. The
underwriters may close out any covered short position by either
exercising their over-allotment option to purchase shares or
purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source
of shares to close out the covered short position, the
underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of
shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to
the price at which they may purchase shares through the
over-allotment option. Naked short sales are any short sales in
excess of such over-allotment option. The underwriters must
close out any naked short
107
position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the common stock in the open market after pricing that could
adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering.
Stabilizing transactions. The underwriters may make
bids for or purchases of the shares for the purpose of pegging,
fixing or maintaining the price of the shares, so long as
stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.
Penalty bids. If the underwriters purchase shares in
the open market in a stabilizing transaction or syndicate
covering transaction, they may reclaim a selling concession from
the underwriters and selling group members who sold those shares
as part of this offering. Stabilization and syndicate covering
transactions may cause the price of the shares to be higher than
it would be in the absence of these transactions. The imposition
of a penalty bid might also have an effect on the price of the
shares if it discourages presales of the shares.
The transactions above may occur on the Nasdaq Global Market or
otherwise. Neither we nor the underwriters make any
representation or prediction as to the effect that the
transactions described above may have on the price of the
shares. If these transactions are commenced, they may be
discontinued without notice at any time.
Relationships
The underwriters and their respective affiliates are full
service financial institutions engaged in various activities,
which may include securities trading, commercial and investment
banking, financial advisory, investment management, principal
investment, hedging, financing and brokerage activities. Certain
of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have, from
time to time, performed, and may in the future perform, various
financial advisory, corporate and investment banking services
for us, for which they received or will receive customary fees
and expenses.
In the ordinary course of their various business activities, the
underwriters and their respective affiliates may make or hold a
broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity
securities (or related derivative securities) and financial
instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for
the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold long
and short positions in such securities and instruments. Such
investment and securities activities may involve our securities
and instruments.
Conflict
of Interest
Branch Banking & Trust Company, an affiliate of
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, LLC, is a lender under our senior revolving credit
facility. Because an affiliate of BB&T Capital Markets, a
division of Scott & Stringfellow, LLC, will receive
more than 5% of the net proceeds of the offering, BB&T
Capital Markets, a division of Scott & Stringfellow,
LLC, is deemed to have a conflict of interest under
Rule 5121 of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc., or FINRA. Because a bona fide public market (as defined in
FINRA Rule 5121) exists for the common stock, a
qualified independent underwriter is not required to be
appointed; however, this offering will be conducted in
accordance with all other applicable provisions of FINRA
Rule 5121. In accordance with FINRA Rule 5121,
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott &
Stringfellow, LLC, will not make sales to discretionary accounts
without the prior written consent of the account holders.
Sales
Outside the United States
No action has been taken in any jurisdiction (except in the
United States) that would permit a public offering of the common
shares, or the possession, circulation or distribution of this
prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus or any other
material relating to us or the common shares in any jurisdiction
where action for that purpose is required. Accordingly, the
common shares may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, and none of this prospectus supplement, the
accompanying prospectus or any other offering material or
advertisements in connection with the common shares may be
distributed or published, in or from any country or jurisdiction
except in compliance with any applicable rules and regulations
of any such country or jurisdiction. Each of the underwriters
may arrange to sell common shares offered hereby in certain
jurisdictions outside the United States, either directly or
through affiliates, where they are permitted to do so.
108
European
Economic Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area
that has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), an offer to the public of
shares of common stock described in this prospectus supplement
(the Shares) may not be made in that Relevant Member
State, except that an offer to the public in that Relevant
Member State may be made at any time under the following
exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they have been
implemented in that Relevant Member State:
|
|
|
|
|
to legal entities which are qualified investors as defined under
the Prospectus Directive;
|
|
|
by the underwriters to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member
State has implemented the relevant provisions of the 2010 PD
Amending Directive, 150 natural or legal persons (other than
qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive) as
permitted under the Prospectus Directive, subject to obtaining
the prior consent of the underwriters for any such offer; or
|
|
|
in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of
the Prospectus Directive;
|
provided that no such offer of shares of common stock shall
require us or any underwriter to publish a prospectus pursuant
to Article 3 of the Prospective Directive.
Each purchaser of shares of common stock described in this
prospectus supplement located within a Relevant Member State
will be deemed to have represented, acknowledged and agreed that:
(i) it is a qualified investor as defined under
the Prospectus Directive; and
(ii) in the case of any shares of common stock acquired by
it as a financial intermediary, as that term is used in
Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, (i) the
shares of common stock acquired by it in the offer have not been
acquired on behalf of, nor have they been acquired with a view
to their offer or resale to, persons in any Relevant Member
State other than qualified investors, as that term is defined in
the Prospectus Directive, or in circumstances in which the prior
consent of the underwriters has been given to the offer or
resale; or (ii) where the shares of common stock have been
acquired by it on behalf of persons in any Relevant Member State
other than qualified investors, the offer of those shares of
common stock to it is not treated under the Prospectus Directive
as having been made to such persons.
For purposes of this provision, the expression an offer to
the public in any relevant member state means the
communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the shares of common
stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to
purchase or subscribe the shares of common stock, as the
expression may be varied in that member state by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that member state, and
the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD
Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant
Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State, and the expression 2010 PD
Amending Directive means Directive 2010/73/EC.
United
Kingdom
This prospectus and any other material in relation to the shares
described herein is only being distributed to, and is only
directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are qualified
investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the
Prospective Directive (qualified investors) that
also (i) have professional experience in matters relating
to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion)
Order 2005, as amended, or the Order, (ii) who fall within
Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order or (iii) to
whom it may otherwise lawfully be communicated (all such persons
together being referred to as relevant persons). The
shares are only available to, and any invitation, offer or
agreement to purchase or otherwise acquire such shares will be
engaged in only with, relevant persons. This offering memorandum
and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed,
published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or disclosed by
recipients to any other person in the United Kingdom. Any person
in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant person should not
act or rely on this prospectus or any of its contents.
The distribution of this prospectus in the United Kingdom to
anyone not falling within the above categories is not permitted
and may contravene FSMA. No person falling outside those
categories should treat this prospectus as constituting a
promotion to him, or act on it for any purposes whatever.
Recipients of this prospectus are advised that
109
we, the underwriters and any other person that communicates this
prospectus are not, as a result solely of communicating this
prospectus, acting for or advising them and are not responsible
for providing recipients of this prospectus with the protections
which would be given to those who are clients of any
aforementioned entities that is subject to the Financial
Services Authority Rules.
France
The prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
(including any amendment, supplement or replacement thereto)
have not been approved either by the Autorité des
marchés financiers or by the competent authority of
another State that is a contracting party to the Agreement on
the European Economic Area and notified to the Autorité
des marchés financiers; no security has been offered or
sold and will be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the
public in France within the meaning of Article L.
411-1 of the
French Code Monétaire et Financier except to permitted
investors, or Permitted Investors, consisting of persons
licensed to provide the investment service of portfolio
management for the account of third parties, qualified investors
(investisseurs qualifiés) acting for their own
account
and/or a
limited circle of investors (cercle restreint
dinvestisseurs) acting for their own account, with
qualified investors and limited circle of
investors having the meaning ascribed to them in
Articles L.
411-2, D.
411-1, D.
411-2, D.
411-4, D.
744-1, D.
754-1 and D.
764-1 of the
French Code Monétaire et Financier; none of this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying Prospectus or any
other materials related to the offer or information contained
therein relating to our securities has been released, issued or
distributed to the public in France except to Permitted
Investors; and the direct or indirect resale to the public in
France of any securities acquired by any Permitted Investors may
be made only as provided by Articles L.
411-1, L.
411-2, L.
412-1 and L.
621-8 to L.
621-8-3 of
the French Code Monétaire et Financier and
applicable regulations thereunder.
Notice to
the Residents of Germany
This document has not been prepared in accordance with the
requirements for a securities or sales prospectus under the
German Securities Prospectus Act
(Wertpapierprospektgesetz), the German Sales Prospectus
Act (Verkaufsprospektgesetz), or the German Investment
Act (Investmentgesetz). Neither the German Federal
Financial Services Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt fur
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin) nor any
other German authority has been notified of the intention to
distribute the securities in Germany. Consequently, the
securities may not be distributed in Germany by way of public
offering, public advertisement or in any similar manner AND THIS
DOCUMENT AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE OFFERING, AS
WELL AS INFORMATION OR STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN, MAY NOT BE
SUPPLIED TO THE PUBLIC IN GERMANY OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH ANY
OFFER FOR SUBSCRIPTION OF THE SECURITIES TO THE PUBLIC IN
GERMANY OR ANY OTHER MEANS OF PUBLIC MARKETING. The securities
are being offered and sold in Germany only to qualified
investors which are referred to in Section 3,
paragraph 2 no. 1, in connection with Section 2,
no. 6, of the German Securities Prospectus Act. This
document is strictly for use of the person who has received it.
It may not be forwarded to other persons or published in Germany.
Switzerland
This document does not constitute a prospectus within the
meaning of Art. 652a of the Swiss Code of Obligations. The
shares of common stock may not be sold directly or indirectly in
or into Switzerland except in a manner which will not result in
a public offering within the meaning of the Swiss Code of
Obligations. Neither this document nor any other offering
materials relating to the shares of common stock may be
distributed, published or otherwise made available in
Switzerland except in a manner which will not constitute a
public offer of the shares of common stock in Switzerland.
110
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby and
certain other legal matters will be passed upon for us by
K&L Gates LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina. Certain legal
matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for
the Underwriters by Latham & Watkins LLP,
Washington, D.C.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Primo Water Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2010 included in this prospectus and registration statement have
been so included in reliance on the report of
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm as set forth in its report thereon
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The combined financial statements of Culligan Store Solutions
Group of Culligan Holding S.ár.l as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, included in this
registration statement and prospectus have been so included in
reliance on the report of KPMG LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as set forth in its report thereon
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1,
including exhibits, schedules and amendments filed with the
registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. This
prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement and exhibits and schedules to the
registration statement. The rules and regulations of the SEC
allow us to omit from this prospectus certain information
included in the registration statement. For further information
with respect to our company and the shares of our common stock
to be sold in this offering, we refer you to the registration
statement, including the exhibits and schedules thereto.
Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of
any contract or other document referred to in this prospectus
are not necessarily complete and, where that contract or other
document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement, each statement in this prospectus is qualified in all
respects by the exhibit to which the reference relates. We are
subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are required to file
annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. These documents are publicly
available, free of charge, on our website (www.primowater.com)
as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such documents
with the SEC.
You can read the registration statement and our future filings
with the SEC over the Internet at the SECs website at
www.sec.gov. You may request copies of the filing, at no cost,
by telephone at
(336) 331-4000
or by mail at Primo Water Corporation, 104 Cambridge Plaza
Drive, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104. You may also read
and copy any document we file with the SEC at its public
reference facility at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain
copies of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the
Public Reference Section of the SEC. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the public reference
facilities.
111
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations is derived from our historical consolidated financial
statements included herein for the year ended December 31,
2010 and the unaudited statement of operations of the Refill
Business from January 1, 2010 through the date of
acquisition. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations should be read in conjunction with these historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes and our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included herein.
On November 10, 2010, in connection with our initial public
offering, we purchased certain assets from Culligan Store
Solutions, LLC and Culligan Canada related to their business of
providing reverse osmosis water filtration systems that generate
filtered water for refill vending machines and store-use water
services in the United States and Canada. This business also
sells empty reusable water bottles for use at refill vending
machines (such businesses are together referred to as the
Refill Business). The total purchase price of the
Refill Business was approximately $109.1 million
(consisting of $74.5 million in cash and
2,587,500 shares of our common stock).
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2010 has been prepared to give
pro forma effect to (1) our initial public offering at
$12.00 per share, (2) our entry into and making of
borrowings under our current senior revolving credit facility,
(3) the application of the net proceeds from our initial
public offering and borrowings under our current senior
revolving credit facility for the purposes described in our
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
No. 333-165452),
and (4) the consummation of our acquisition of the Refill
Business. The acquisition of the Refill Business is being
accounted for as a business combination in accordance with the
acquisition method. These pro forma adjustments have been made
as if these events had occurred on January 1, 2010.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations
reflects pro forma adjustments that are described in the
accompanying notes and are based on available information and
certain assumptions we believe are reasonable. We have made, in
our opinion, all adjustments that are necessary to present
fairly the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations is presented for informational purposes only and
should not be considered indicative of actual results of
operations that would have been achieved had our acquisition of
the Refill Business and the other transactions described above
been consummated on the date indicated, and does not purport to
be indicative of results of operations for any future period.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations
does not reflect any anticipated operating efficiencies or cost
savings from the acquisition of the Refill Business into our
business.
112
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primo Water
|
|
|
Refill
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
|
$
|
22,446
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,053
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
34,213
|
|
|
|
11,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,534
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,621
|
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,967
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
(a)
|
|
|
8,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
54,084
|
|
|
|
16,012
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
71,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
|
(1,171
|
)
|
|
|
(4,214
|
)
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,670
|
(b)
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
6,434
|
|
|
|
(1,171
|
)
|
|
|
(5,048
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,449
|
)
|
|
|
340
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
(5,048
|
)
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(9,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
(d)
|
|
|
(7,828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(22,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,985
|
|
|
$
|
3,842
|
|
|
$
|
(12,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The historical statement of operations for Primo Water
Corporation includes the results of operations of the Refill
Business from the acquisition date of November 10, 2010 to
December 31, 2010, while the historical statement of
operations for the Refill Business includes the results of
operations from January 1, 2010 through the acquisition
date. In addition, the pro forma adjustments to the consolidated
statements of operations do not include (i) the
nonrecurring $1.8 million in estimated transaction costs
that were expensed in connection with the acquisition of the
Refill Business at the time the acquisition was completed;
(ii) the effect of the beneficial conversion charge of
$2.9 million recorded upon the completion of the IPO
related to the conversion of the Series B preferred stock
at 90% of the IPO price; (iii) the effect of the beneficial
conversion charge of $2.4 million recorded upon the
completion of the IPO related to the conversion of the
Series C preferred stock at the IPO price of $12.00 per
share; (iv) the effect of the $2.3 million charge
related to the modification of the terms of the common stock
warrants originally issued to the purchasers of the
Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock
to remove a provision that accelerated the termination of the
warrants exercise period upon the consummation of the IPO;
and (v) the effect of the $0.2 million charge related
to the modification of the exercise price of the warrants issued
to the holders of the Series C preferred stock.
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Reflects a charge for depreciation
and amortization based upon an estimation of the portion of the
purchase price that was allocated to the fair value of property
and equipment and identifiable intangibles.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Reflects the additional interest
expense on the estimated borrowings on prior senior revolving
credit facility, net of interest expense on the current senior
revolving credit facility of $0.6 million. The interest
rate on the new senior revolving credit facility has been
estimated at 5.25%. Also reflect: (i) the interest expense
on the amortization of the debt issuance cost on our current
senior revolving credit facility of $0.4 million;
(ii) the reduction of interest expense and amortization of
debt issuance costs on the 2011 Notes of $2.5 million; and
(iii) the reduction of interest expense and amortization of
debt issuance costs of $1.2 million.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Reflects a reversal of the income
tax provision included in the historical financial statements of
the Refill Business. Our historical effective tax rate has been
zero due to our recording of a valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Reflects the conversion and
redemption of the Series B preferred stock and the
associated reduction of preferred stock dividends of
$2.0 million.
|
113
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Primo Water Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Report of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Interim Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refill Business
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
|
|
|
|
|
F-48
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Primo Water Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Primo Water Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Primo Water Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 30, 2011, except for Note 11 as to which the
date is May 13, 2011
F-2
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except par value data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
6,605
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
12,537
|
|
Bottles, net
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
14,321
|
|
|
|
34,890
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,077
|
|
|
|
11,039
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,415
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
22,368
|
|
|
$
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
$
|
4,547
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, capital leases and notes
payable
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
7,481
|
|
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable, net of current
portion
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
17,945
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
22,777
|
|
|
|
26,174
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value
70,000 shares authorized, 1,453 and 19,021 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2010,
respectively
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value
65,000 shares authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock, 18,755 and 0 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B preferred stock, 23,280 and 0 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series C preferred stock, 12,520 and 0 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
86,737
|
|
|
|
220,125
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(90,999
|
)
|
|
|
(113,723
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
113,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
22,368
|
|
|
$
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-3
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
34,647
|
|
|
$
|
46,981
|
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
30,776
|
|
|
|
38,771
|
|
|
|
34,213
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,791
|
|
|
|
9,922
|
|
|
|
12,621
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
48,185
|
|
|
|
52,898
|
|
|
|
54,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(13,538
|
)
|
|
|
(5,917
|
)
|
|
|
(9,477
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(2,258
|
)
|
|
|
(3,431
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(13,608
|
)
|
|
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(19,346
|
)
|
|
|
(11,824
|
)
|
|
|
(12,893
|
)
|
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant
modification charges
|
|
|
(19,875
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042
|
)
|
|
|
(9,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(39,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(23.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
|
(3.96
|
)
|
|
|
(2.51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(27.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-4
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Series A
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
Series C
|
|
|
Subscriptions
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
18,755
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
23,280
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(489)
|
|
|
$
|
49,786
|
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(34,862)
|
|
|
$
|
17,916
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock, Series C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
18,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,232
|
|
Warrants attached to Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature of Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,548)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,327)
|
|
|
|
(2,327)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,346)
|
|
|
|
(19,346)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18,755
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23,280
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
12,520
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,357
|
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,083)
|
|
|
|
16,127
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Dividend of subsidiary stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,050)
|
|
|
|
(2,050)
|
|
Preferred stock dividends accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,042)
|
|
|
|
(3,042)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,824)
|
|
|
|
(11,824)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18,755
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23,280
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
12,520
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,737
|
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,999)
|
|
|
|
(409)
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Restricted stock vesting
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
9,583
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,089
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with the acquisition
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,621
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,933)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature of Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,404)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(18,755)
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640)
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,520)
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640)
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,629)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640)
|
|
Warrant modification charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,491)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Warrant expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(44)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,003)
|
|
|
|
(2,003)
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,893)
|
|
|
|
(12,893)
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,843)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
19,021
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,125
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(113,723)
|
|
|
|
113,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-5
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(19,346)
|
|
|
$
|
(11,824)
|
|
|
$
|
(12,893)
|
|
Less: Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(5,738)
|
|
|
|
(3,650)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(13,608)
|
|
|
|
(8,174)
|
|
|
|
(12,893)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to
net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
4,205
|
|
|
|
4,759
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Other
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,943)
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
(1,891)
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,277)
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
(1,202)
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(93)
|
|
|
|
(782)
|
|
|
|
(518)
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(213)
|
|
|
|
(714)
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(11,832)
|
|
|
|
(1,972)
|
|
|
|
(7,871)
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(8,331)
|
|
|
|
(1,589)
|
|
|
|
(4,938)
|
|
Purchases of bottles, net of disposals
|
|
|
(1,089)
|
|
|
|
(835)
|
|
|
|
(1,480)
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Refill Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,474)
|
|
Additions to and acquisitions of intangible assets
|
|
|
(232)
|
|
|
|
(48)
|
|
|
|
(75)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(9,628)
|
|
|
|
(2,450)
|
|
|
|
(80,967)
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings from (payments on) revolving line of credit
|
|
|
7,004
|
|
|
|
(6,580)
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Issuance of long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,350
|
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
Long term debt payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,668)
|
|
Note payable and capital lease payments
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
(5,353)
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(134)
|
|
|
|
(636)
|
|
|
|
(1,453)
|
|
Net change in book overdraft
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
(147)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,194
|
|
Prepaid equity issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Redemption of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,640)
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
19,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(2,327)
|
|
|
|
(1,257)
|
|
|
|
(4,370)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
24,361
|
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
89,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash from continuing operations
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
5,776
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Cash used in discontinued operations from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
(6,764)
|
|
|
|
(1,514)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,194)
|
|
|
|
(41)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(203)
|
|
|
|
(813)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8,161)
|
|
|
|
(2,368)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-6
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Business
Primo Water Corporation (together with its consolidated
subsidiaries, Primo, we,
our, the Company) is a rapidly growing
provider of three- and five-gallon purified bottled water,
self-serve filtered drinking water and water dispensers sold
through major retailers in the United States and Canada.
Initial
Public Offering and Acquisition
On November 10, 2010, we completed the initial public
offering of 8,333 shares of our common stock at a price of
$12.00 per share. In addition on November 18, 2010, the
Company issued an additional 1,250 shares upon the exercise
of the over-allotment option by the underwriters of its IPO. The
net proceeds of the IPO after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions were approximately $106,900.
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of
Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan of Canada, Ltd. (the
Refill Business or Refill Acquisition)
pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2010
(the Asset Purchase Agreement). The total purchase
price for the Refill Business was approximately $109,095
(including the working capital adjustment), which was paid with
$74,474 in proceeds from the IPO and $34,621 from the issuance
of approximately 2,588 common shares at an average price of
$13.38 per share on November 10, 2010.
In addition to the acquisition of the Refill Business, we used
the proceeds of our IPO along with $15,000 in borrowings under
our new senior revolving credit facility to: (i) repay the
outstanding borrowings under our prior senior loan agreement of
approximately $7,900; (ii) repay subordinated debt and
accrued interest of approximately $18,700; (iii) redeem 50%
of the outstanding Series B preferred stock along with all
unpaid and accrued dividends totaling approximately $15,800; and
(iv) to pay fees and expenses of approximately $5,000 in
connection with all of the foregoing items.
Principles
of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
amounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Our consolidated statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States (GAAP).
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and
assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and
assumptions used to determine certain amounts that affect the
financial statements are reasonable, based on information
available at the time they are made. To the extent there are
material differences between these estimates and actual results,
our consolidated financial statements may be affected. Some of
the more significant estimates include allowances for doubtful
accounts, valuation of inventories, depreciation, valuation of
intangible assets, valuation of deferred taxes and allowance for
sales returns.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized for the sale of three- and five-gallon
purified bottled water upon either the delivery of inventory to
the retail store or the purchase by the consumer. Revenue is
either recognized as an exchange transaction (where a discount
is provided on the purchase of a three- or five-gallon bottle of
purified water for the return of an empty three- or five-gallon
bottle) or a non-exchange transaction. Revenues on exchange
transactions
F-7
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
are recognized net of the exchange discount. Self-serve filtered
water revenue is recognized at the time the water is filtered
which is measured by the water dispensing equipment meter.
Our water dispensers are sold primarily through a direct-import
model, where we recognize revenue when title is transferred to
our retail customers. We have no contractual obligation to
accept returns of water dispensers nor do we guarantee water
dispenser sales. However, we will at times accept returns or
issue credits for water dispensers that have manufacturer
defects or that were damaged in transit. Revenues of water
dispensers are recognized net of an estimated allowance for
returns using an average return rate based upon historical
experience.
In addition, we offer certain incentives such as coupons and
rebates that are netted against and reduce net sales in the
consolidated statements of operations. With the purchase of
certain of our water dispensers we include a coupon for a free
three- or five-gallon bottle of water. No revenue is recognized
with respect to the redemption of the coupon for a free
three-and five-gallon bottle of water and the estimated cost of
the three- and five-gallon bottle of water is included in cost
of sales.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three
months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash
equivalents.
Accounts
Receivable
All trade accounts receivable are due from customers located
within the United States and Canada. We maintain an allowance
for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of our customers to make required payments. Accounts
receivable, net includes allowances for doubtful accounts of
approximately $112 and $244 at December 31, 2009 and 2010,
respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a
review of specifically identified accounts in addition to an
overall aging analysis. Judgments are made with respect to the
collectability of accounts receivable based on historical
experience and current economic trends. Actual losses could
differ from those estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Revenues, Costs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
or Expense
|
|
|
Accounts(a)
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479)
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(109)
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes adjustments related to our
acquisition of the Refill Business.
|
Prepaid
and other current assets
Prepaid and other current assets consist primarily of amounts
due from one of our international water dispenser manufacturers.
The amounts due are related to costs and charges for returns on
defective water dispensers that the manufacturer guaranteed
under the terms our agreement.
Inventories
Our inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are
valued at the lower of cost or realizable value, with cost
determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Miscellaneous selling supplies such as
labels are expensed when incurred.
F-8
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Bottles
Bottles consist of three- and five- gallon refillable
polycarbonate bottles used in our exchange business and are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of three years.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. For internally developed
software, certain costs during the application development stage
and related to upgrades and enhancements that provide additional
functionality are capitalized and amortized over the estimated
useful life of the software. The vending equipment is
depreciated using an estimated salvage value of 25%.
Depreciation and amortization is generally calculated using
straight-line methods over estimated useful lives that range
from two to 10 years.
The Company incurs maintenance costs on its major equipment.
Maintenance, repair and minor refurbishment costs are charged to
expense as incurred, while additions, renewals, and improvements
are capitalized.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
We classify intangible assets into three categories:
(1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to
amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives
not subject to amortization and (3) goodwill. We determine
the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after
considering the specific facts and circumstances related to each
intangible asset. Factors we consider when determining useful
lives include the contractual term of any agreement related to
the asset, the historical performance of the asset, the
Companys long-term strategy for using the asset, any laws
or other local regulations which could impact the useful life of
the asset, and other economic factors, including competition and
specific market conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to
have definite lives are amortized, primarily on a straight-line
basis, over their useful lives.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful
lives, including trademarks and goodwill, for impairment
annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate
that assets might be impaired. Our Company performs these annual
impairment reviews as of the first day of our fourth quarter.
The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if
necessary. The first step involves a comparison of the fair
value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. The fair value
is estimated based on a number of factors including operating
results, business plans and future cash flows. If the carrying
amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second
step of the process is performed which compares the implied
value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying value of
the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of
the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value
of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. No impairment charge was considered
necessary at December 31, 2010. For indefinite-lived
intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount
exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an
amount equal to that excess.
Long-Lived
Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is
not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash
flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition
of the asset at the date it is tested for recoverability,
whether in use or under development. An impairment loss is
measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. We recorded an
impairment charge in 2008 of $98 reflected in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the statement of operations,
related to display racks no longer in use and to be disposed.
F-9
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures, for financial assets and liabilities.
ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of
ASC 820 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. ASC 820 also describes three
levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 2 observable inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which there is
little or no market data available, which require the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
The following is a reconciliation of the common stock warrants,
which were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
Initial Fair Value
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
600
|
|
Total (gains) losses recognized
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Initial Fair Value
|
|
|
137
|
|
Fair Value transferred to stockholders equity
|
|
|
(723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the warrants was initially included in other
long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet based
upon estimated fair value as adjusted periodically until such
time that the exercise price became fixed at the IPO date, at
which time the then fair value was reclassified as a component
of stockholders equity (deficit). In connection with our
IPO the exercise price per share of the warrants was fixed at
$9.60, or 80% of the IPO price per share of our common stock.
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued expenses,
approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.
Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for
loans with similar terms, the carrying value of long-term debt,
capital leases and notes payable approximates fair value.
Advertising
Costs
Costs incurred for producing and distributing advertising and
advertising materials are expensed when incurred. Advertising
costs totaled approximately $717, $270 and $296 for 2008, 2009
and 2010, respectively, and are included in selling, general,
and administrative expenses.
Beneficial
Conversion Charges
Our Series C Preferred Stock (Series C)
was convertible into common stock and was issued with an
adjustable conversion feature, which was based upon consolidated
revenue for the year ending December 31, 2008 with a
conversion price ranging from $13.04 to $25.04 per common
equivalent share. A beneficial conversion charge is
F-10
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
measured as the difference between the initial price of $25.04
per share and the conversion price at December 31, 2008 of
$13.04 per share. At December 31, 2008 we recorded a
beneficial conversion charge (also referred to as a deemed
dividend) of approximately $17,500 related to the adjustment in
the conversion price of the Series C convertible preferred
stock, based upon consolidated revenues for the year ending
December 31, 2008. The beneficial conversion charge for
equity instruments is recorded to additional paid in capital
with no effect on total stockholders equity or the
consolidated statement of operations.
In 2010, the conversion ratio of Series C was amended thus
creating a contingent beneficial conversion that was measured
and recorded at the time the contingency was removed, or at the
time the IPO price per share was known and less than $13.04 per
share. With the IPO per share price of $12.00, the Company
recorded a beneficial conversion charge related to the
Series C of $2,404. The charge was recorded to additional
paid in capital with no effect on total stockholders
equity or the consolidated statement of operations.
In 2010, our Series B Preferred Stock
(Series B) was amended to provide for the
mandatory conversion of at least 50% of Series B into
common stock at a conversion ratio calculated by dividing the
liquidation preference of Series B by 90% of the greater of
the IPO price and $10.44. This amendment also created a
contingent beneficial conversion that was measured at the time
of the IPO. The Company recorded a beneficial conversion charge
related to the Series B of $2,933. The charge was recorded
to additional paid in capital with no effect on total
stockholders equity or the consolidated statement of
operations.
Concentrations
of Risk
Our principal financial instruments subject to potential
concentration of credit risk are cash and cash equivalents,
trade receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses. We
invest our funds in a highly rated institution and believe the
financial risks associated with cash and cash equivalents are
minimal. At December 31, 2009 and 2010, approximately $0
and $441, respectively, of our cash on deposit exceeded the
insured limits.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers
financial condition and maintain allowances for doubtful
accounts that we believe are sufficient to provide for losses
that may be sustained on realization of accounts receivable. We
had two customers that accounted for approximately 42% and 21%
in 2008; three customers that accounted for approximately 33%,
19% and 15% of sales in 2009; and two customers that accounted
for approximately 37% and 21% of sales in 2010. We had one
customer with a balance that accounted for approximately 21% of
total trade receivables at December 31, 2009 and two
customers that accounted for approximately 35% and 12% of total
trade receivables at December 31, 2010.
Basic and
Diluted Net loss Per Share
Net loss per share has been computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.
Diluted amounts per share include the dilutive impact, if any,
of the Companys outstanding potential common shares, such
as options and warrants and convertible preferred stock.
Potential common shares that are anti-dilutive are excluded from
the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock and warrants with
respect to an aggregate of 142, 139 and 430 shares, as well
as 3,626, 4,101 and 3,700 shares of convertible preferred
stock, have been excluded from the computation of the number of
shares used in the diluted earnings per share, respectively.
These shares have been excluded because the Company incurred a
net loss for each of these periods and their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
F-11
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability
method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events
that have been included in the financial statements. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based
on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases
of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for
the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the
extent that utilization is not presently more likely than not.
As required by
ASC 740-10,
we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position
only after determining that the relevant tax authority would
more likely than not sustain the position following an audit.
For tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold,
the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest
benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of
being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax
authority.
Cumulative
Translation Adjustment and Foreign Currency
Transactions
The local currency of our operation in Canada is considered to
be the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the Canada
subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars using the
exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Results of
operations are translated using the average exchange rate
prevailing throughout the period. The effects of unrealized
exchange rate fluctuations on translating foreign currency
assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars are accumulated as
the cumulative translation adjustment included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in members equity.
Realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are
included in the statement of operations.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-28
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This
update provides amendments to ASC Topic 350
Intangibles, Goodwill and Other that requires an entity to
perform Step 2 impairment test even if a reporting unit has zero
or negative carrying amount. The first step is to identify
potential impairments by comparing the estimated fair value of a
reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the
carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair
value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. The second step is to determine the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill, measured in
the same manner as goodwill is recognized in a business
combination, and compare that amount with the carrying amount of
the goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
ASU
No. 2010-28
is effective beginning January 1, 2011. As a result of this
standard, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under
current practice. We do not expect ASU
No. 2010-28
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-29,
which contains updated accounting guidance to clarify the
acquisition date that should be used for reporting pro forma
financial information when comparative financial statements are
issued. This update requires that a company should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the
business combination(s) that occurred during the current year
had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual
reporting period only. This update also requires disclosure of
the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments. The provisions of this update, which are to be
applied prospectively, are effective for business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The
F-12
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
impact of this update on the Companys consolidated
financial statements will depend on the size and nature of
future business combinations.
Bottles are summarized as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
$
|
2,637
|
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
$
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for bottles was approximately $853, $907
and $971 in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
|
|
3.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment is summarized as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
Vending equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,169
|
|
Racks and display panels
|
|
|
12,389
|
|
|
|
15,816
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Software and computer equipment
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
3,076
|
|
Transportation racks
|
|
|
4,039
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,128
|
|
|
|
47,057
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,807
|
)
|
|
|
(12,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,321
|
|
|
$
|
34,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was
approximately $2,223, $2,897 and $3,371 in 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
|
|
4.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
Acquisition of Refill Business
|
|
|
77,382
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
77,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill relates to the acquisition of the Refill Business and
represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of
net assets acquired.
F-13
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Intangible assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
2,985
|
|
|
$
|
(2,089)
|
|
|
$
|
13,289
|
|
|
$
|
(2,484)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patent costs
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(58)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,056
|
|
|
|
(2,125)
|
|
|
|
13,410
|
|
|
|
(2,542)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,202
|
|
|
$
|
(2,125)
|
|
|
$
|
13,581
|
|
|
$
|
(2,542)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, patents,
and trademarks. Patent costs are amortized using a straight-line
basis over estimated lives of three years, while customer
relationships are amortized on an either an accelerated or
straight-line basis over an estimated useful life ranging from
10 to 15 years. In 2010, we acquired customer relationships
related to the Refill Business totaling $10,300 that have a
useful life of 15 years.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately
$542, $401 and $417, respectively, in 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets,
which is an estimate for each future year and subject to change,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
2012
|
|
|
859
|
|
2013
|
|
|
807
|
|
2014
|
|
|
764
|
|
2015
|
|
|
743
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
6,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
5.
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
$
|
2,367
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related items
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
Accrued severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Accrued professional and other expenses
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Accrued sales tax payable
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Accrued advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued receipts not invoiced
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Other
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,144
|
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Long-Term
Debt, Capital Leases and Notes
|
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable are summarized
as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Senior revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,912
|
|
Senior loan agreement
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated convertible notes payable, net of original issue
discount
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and capital leases
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,829
|
|
|
|
17,956
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, notes payable and capital leases, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
14,403
|
|
|
$
|
17,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 10, 2010, we closed our IPO and entered into a
$40,000 senior revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and Branch
Banking & Trust Company (Senior Revolving
Credit Facility) that replaced our Senior Loan Agreement
(as defined below). The Senior Revolving Credit Facility has a
three-year term and is secured by substantially all of the
assets of the Company.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Senior
Revolving Credit Facility is payable at our option at either a
floating base rate plus an interest rate spread or a floating
rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread. Both the interest
rate spreads and the commitment fee rate are determined from a
pricing grid based on our total leverage ratio. The Senior
Revolving Credit Facility also provides for letters of credit
issued to our vendors, which reduce the amount available for
cash borrowings. We are required to pay a commitment fee on the
unused amounts of the commitments under the Senior Revolving
Credit Facility. At December 31, 2010, the base rate and
floating LIBOR borrowings outstanding were $2,912 and $15,000,
respectively, at interest rates of 5.25% and 3.27%,
respectively. At December 31, 2010, there were no
outstanding letters of credit under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility. The availability under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility was approximately $10,000, based upon the maximum
leverage ratio allowed at December 31, 2010.
F-15
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
The Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains various
restrictive covenants and the following financial covenants:
(i) a maximum total leverage ratio that is initially set at
3.5 to 1.0 and step downs to 2.5 to 1.0 for the quarter ending
December 31, 2011; (ii) a minimum EBITDA threshold
initially set at $6,500 for the quarter ended December 31,
2010 and increasing for the two quarters thereafter;
(iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.0 to 1.0
beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2011; and
(iv) a maximum amount of capital expenditures of
$6.0 million for the period from closing to
December 31, 2010 and increasing to $25.0 million for
the year ending December 31, 2011. At December 31,
2010, the Company is in compliance with all the terms and
conditions of the Senior Revolving Credit Facility.
In June 2005, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement that
was amended in April 2006, April 2007, June 2008, January 2009,
December 2009 and June 2010 (the Senior Loan
Agreement) pursuant to which the bank originally provided
a $25,000 revolving loan commitment (the Revolver).
In June 2008, the Revolver commitment was reduced to $20,000 and
it was subsequently reduced further to $10,000 in January 2009.
The Revolver was subject to certain borrowing base restrictions
based on eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory less
reserves, and the aggregate face amount of undrawn trade letters
of credit of which the Company is the beneficiary. The Revolver
also provided for letters of credit issued to our vendors, which
reduced the amount available for cash borrowings. The Seventh
Amendment to the Senior Loan Agreement extended the term of the
agreement to January 30, 2011, allowed for up to a $3,000
over-advance, which was guaranteed by our CEO, and amended the
agreements financial covenants. At December 31, 2009,
there were outstanding letters of credit under the Revolver
totaling approximately $371.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Revolver was
payable quarterly at the option of the Company at (i) the
LIBOR Market Index Rate (LMIR) plus the applicable
margin or (ii) the greater of (a) the federal funds
rate plus .50% or (b) the banks prime rate plus in
either case the applicable margin. At December 31, 2009,
the interest rate on the outstanding balance on the Revolver was
based on the banks prime rate plus 2.50% (5.75% at
December 31, 2009).
In December 2009 and September 2010, we issued Subordinated
Convertible Promissory Notes (Notes) that had a
total face value of $15,000 and $3,418, respectively, and were
subordinated to borrowings under the Senior Loan Agreement. The
September 2010 Notes related to borrowings outstanding at
September 30, 2010 were closed in October 2010. The Notes
paid quarterly interest at 14% and were paid in full in November
2010 using the proceeds from our IPO and closing of the Senior
Revolving Credit Facility.
The Notes were accompanied by detachable warrants with a value
at issuance equal to 4% of the face amount of the corresponding
Notes. The total number of shares of common stock issuable under
the warrants is 131. The initial fair value of the warrants was
$737, of which $137 is attributable to the Notes issued in the
third quarter of 2010, and resulted in an original issue
discount on the Notes that was amortized into interest expense
over the term of the Notes with the unamortized balance being
expensed when the Notes were paid in full in November 2010. The
fair value of the warrants was initially included in other
long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet based
upon estimated fair value as adjusted periodically until such
time that the exercise price became fixed at the IPO date, at
which time the then fair value was reclassified as a component
of stockholders equity (deficit). In connection with our
IPO the exercise price per share of the warrants was fixed at
$9.60, or 80% of the initial public offering price per share of
our common stock.
In January 2009, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement
with our primary bank that was subordinated to the Senior Loan
Agreement (the Prior Subordinated Loan Agreement),
pursuant to which a $10,000 term loan was provided (the
Prior Subordinated Loan). The bank acted as
syndication agent and provided $4,100 of the facility. Twelve
existing investors in the Company (including our CEO and CFO)
funded the $5,900 balance of the facility. The proceeds of the
Prior Subordinated Loan Agreement were used to repay the then
outstanding balance on the Revolver and for working capital
purposes. Interest on the Prior Subordinated Loan was at the
banks prime
F-16
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
rate plus 10.0%, payable monthly. The Prior Subordinated Loan
had an original maturity of January 6, 2010; however, the
balance was paid in full in December 2009. In connection with
the Prior Subordinated Loan the Company paid fees totaling
approximately $575, which were deferred and amortized as a
component of interest expense.
In June 2010, we entered into two notes for the purchase of
delivery vehicles in our Company operations totaling $46. The
notes bear interest at 4.90% and are payable in 60 monthly
installments of approximately $0.9.
The aggregate future maturities of long-term debt, capital
leases and notes payable as of December 31, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
2012
|
|
|
9
|
|
2013
|
|
|
17,921
|
|
2014
|
|
|
10
|
|
2015
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,956
|
|
Less: amounts representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors and stockholders approved the Fifth
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Revised
Charter) that effected a
1-for-10.435
reverse stock split of all the outstanding shares of common
stock and a proportional adjustment to the existing conversion
ratios for each series of preferred stock and provides that the
authorized capital stock consists of (1) 70,000 shares
of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and
(2) 65,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par
value per share. Accordingly, all common share and per common
share amounts for all periods presented in these consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto, have been adjusted
retroactively, where applicable, to reflect this reverse stock
split and adjustment of the preferred stock conversion ratios.
The Revised Charter became effective in connection with the
closing of our IPO. The Revised Charter resulted in the
following in connection with the IPO: (i) the mandatory
conversion of the Series A preferred stock
(Series A) into common stock at a conversion
ratio of approximately 1:0.0960, (ii) the mandatory
conversion of the Series C preferred stock
(Series C) into shares of common stock at a
conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.2000 based upon the IPO
price per share of $12.00, (iii) the mandatory conversion
of at least 50% of the Series B preferred stock
(Series B) into common stock at a conversion
ratio of approximately 1:0.0926, calculated by dividing the
liquidation preference of the Series B by 90% of IPO price
of $12.00, (iv) the repurchase of the balance of the
outstanding shares of the Series B within 30 days
following the IPO for $1.00 per share, and (v) payment of
accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series B within
30 days following the IPO.
Preferred
Stock
Upon closing of our IPO 18,755 shares of the Series A
were converted into shares of common stock at a conversion ratio
of approximately 1:0.0960.
Upon the closing of the IPO, 50% of the then outstanding
23,280 shares of the Series B were converted into
common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately 1:0.0926,
calculated by dividing the liquidation preference of the
Series B by 90% of IPO price of $12.00, with the remaining
50% of the Series B being repurchased for $1.00 per
F-17
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
share. The conversion of the Series B at 90% of the IPO
price created a beneficial conversion charge of approximately
$2,900 at the time of the IPO. The beneficial conversion charge
or deemed dividend was recorded to additional paid in capital
with no effect on total stockholders equity, but increased
the net loss attributable to common stockholders in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
In December 2009, all payment of dividends on the Series B
was suspended and in January 2010 the dividends began to accrue
at 10%. Series B dividends paid during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010, were $1,257 and $4,370,
respectively. At December 31, 2009, the accrued and unpaid
dividends were $2,367. Upon the closing of the IPO all accrued
and unpaid dividends were paid.
Upon the closing of the IPO the then outstanding
12,520 shares of the Series C were converted into
shares of common stock at a conversion ratio of approximately
1:0.2000 based upon the IPO price per share of $12.00. With the
Revised Charter the conversion ratio for the Series C was
adjusted from the original amount based upon $13.04 per share to
an amount based upon the greater of $10.44 or the IPO price.
This adjustment created a contingent beneficial conversion upon
the closing of our IPO and conversion of the Series C. The
beneficial conversion charge related to the conversion of the
Series C preferred stock at the IPO price of $12.00 per
share was approximately $2,400. The beneficial conversion charge
or deemed dividend was recorded to additional paid in capital
with no effect on total stockholders equity, but increased
the net loss attributable to common stockholders in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
In connection with the amendments to the Revised Charter, we
also modified the terms of common stock warrants for the
aggregate purchase of 716 shares of common stock,
originally issued to the purchasers of the Series B and
Series C, to remove a provision that accelerated the
termination of the warrants exercise period upon the
consummation of an IPO. The warrants will now expire on the date
such warrants would have otherwise expired absent the IPO. At
the time of the modification, a charge of approximately $2,300,
the change in the estimated fair value immediately before and
after the modification, as determined using the Black-Scholes
pricing model, was recorded to accumulated deficit with no
effect on total stockholders equity, but increased the net
loss attributable to common stockholders for 2010.
In addition, in October 2010, we reduced the exercise price of
the warrants issued to the holders of the Series C from
$20.66 to $13.04. At the time of the modification a charge of
approximately $175 was recorded to additional paid in capital
with no effect on total stockholders equity, but increased
the net loss attributable to common stockholders in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
|
|
8.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
2004
Stock Plan
In 2004, our Board of Directors adopted the Primo Water
Corporation 2004 Stock Plan (the 2004 Plan) for
employees, including officers, non-employee directors and
non-employee consultants. The Plan provides for the issue of
incentive or nonqualified stock options and restricted common
stock. The Company has reserved 431 shares of common stock
for issuance under the Plan. The Company does not intend to
issue any additional awards under the 2004 Plan; however, all
outstanding awards will remain in effect and will continue to be
governed by their existing terms.
2010
Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
In April 2010, our stockholders adopted the 2010 Omnibus
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2010 Plan). The 2010
Plan is limited to employees, officers, non-employee directors,
consultants and advisors. The 2010 Plan provides for the
issuance of incentive or nonqualified stock options, restricted
stock, stock appreciation rights,
F-18
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
restricted stock units, cash- or stock-based performance awards
and other stock-based awards. The Company has reserved
719 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2010 Plan.
Stock
Option Activity
We measure the fair value of each stock option grant at the date
of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
weighted-average fair value per share of the options granted
during 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $8.66, $5.11, and $6.16,
respectively. The following assumptions were used in arriving at
the fair value of options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Expected life of options in years
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
rate for the expected life of the options at the time of grant.
As a newly-public entity, historic volatility is not available
for our shares. As a result, we estimated volatility based on a
peer group of companies, which collectively provide a reasonable
basis for estimating volatility. We intend to continue to
consistently use the same group of publicly traded peer
companies to determine volatility in the future until sufficient
information regarding volatility of our share price becomes
available or the selected companies are no longer suitable for
this purpose. The expected life is based on the estimated
average life of the options, and forfeitures are estimated on
the date of grant based on certain historical data and
management estimates.
F-19
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
In 2008, 2009 and 2010, compensation expense related to stock
options was approximately $215, $298 and $387 and is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses from continuing
operations, respectively, and approximately $61, $80 and $0 is
included in discontinued operations, respectively. A summary of
awards under the Plan at December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010,
and changes during the years then ended is presented in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
11.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
20.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
18.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
13.15
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
$
|
10.85
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
12.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
13.15
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
12.63
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
11.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
17.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
13.14
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
13.14
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, a total of 31 common stock options were granted
under the 2004 Plan, all in the first quarter of 2010, at an
exercise price of $12.84 per share. The estimated fair value of
the common stock on the issuance date was $12.84 per share. The
Company obtained a valuation from an unrelated party in December
2009 that determined the fair value of the Companys common
stock to be $12.84 per share.
During 2009, a total of 14 common stock options were granted,
all issued on one date during the first quarter, at an exercise
price of $13.04 per share. The estimated fair value of the
common stock on the issuance date was $13.04 per share. The fair
value determination was based in part upon the finalization of
the conversion ratio of the Series C Preferred Stock on
December 31, 2008. The board of directors also considered
the Companys most recent independent valuation and then
current expectations of the Companys future performance in
determining the fair value.
F-20
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during 2008,
2009 and 2010 was approximately $8, $0 and $8, respectively,
with proceeds to the Company of $13, $2 and $65, respectively.
In April 2010, the Board of Directors approved the 100% vesting
of all unvested stock options awards upon the successful
completion of an IPO of the Companys common stock. The IPO
was completed in November 2010 and all unrecognized compensation
cost related to the stock option awards that became 100% vested
was expensed in the fourth quarter.
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to 100%
of the fair market value per share of the common stock on the
date of grant. The options generally vest over a period of one
to four years, based on graded vesting, and expire ten years
from the date of grant. The terms and conditions of the awards
made under the Plans vary but, in general, are at the discretion
of the board of directors or its appointed committee.
Restricted
Stock Activity
In 2010, we granted restricted stock awards under the 2004 Plan,
all in the first quarter of 2010, that generally cliff-vest
annually over a three-year period and we recognized compensation
expense of $298 related to these awards, which is included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses from continuing
operations. In addition, in connection with the guarantee of the
$3,000 over-advance line of the Senior Loan Agreement by our
CEO, the Company granted a restricted stock award under the 2010
Plan, in the fourth quarter of 2010, which vested in January
2011. The value of the restricted stock was $150 and was
expensed in 2010 as part of the issuance cost of the guarantee
on the Senior Loan Agreement.
A reconciliation of restricted stock activity and related
information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
12.75
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
12.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
12.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately $897 of
total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated
forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock awards. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 2.1 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In April 2010, our stockholders approved the 2010 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the 2010 ESPP) which was effective
upon the consummation of the Companys IPO. The 2010 ESPP
provides for the purchase of common stock and is generally
available to all employees. The Company has reserved
24 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2010 ESPP.
Effective January 1, 2011, employees were able to
participate in the 2010 ESPP.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Operating
Leases
The Company leases office space and vehicles under various lease
arrangements. Total rental expense from continuing operations
for 2008, 2009 and 2010 was approximately $1,496, $1,101 and
$1,288, respectively. The rental expense includes $325 in 2008
paid to PWC Leasing, LLC, which is an entity with common
ownership. On June 30, 2008, we purchased the leased assets
of PWC Leasing, LLC at the fair value of $3,500 and terminated
the
F-21
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
related lease agreement. At December 31, 2010, future
minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
2012
|
|
|
548
|
|
2013
|
|
|
405
|
|
2014
|
|
|
231
|
|
2015
|
|
|
83
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Tax
We routinely purchase equipment for use in operations from
various vendors. These purchases are subject to sales tax
depending on the equipment type and local sales tax regulations,
however, certain vendors have not assessed the appropriate sales
tax. For purchases that are subject to sales tax in which the
vendor did not assess the appropriate amount, we accrue an
estimate of the sales tax liability we ultimately expect to pay.
Other
Contingencies
In the normal course of business the Company may be involved in
various claims and legal actions. Management believes that the
outcome of such legal actions will not have a significant
adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
There is no income tax provision (benefit) for federal or state
income taxes as the Company has incurred operating losses since
inception.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate and
effective tax rates is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Federal statutory taxes
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Foreign taxes less than the domestic rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(37.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(38.2
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Deferred income taxes are recorded based upon differences
between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets
and liabilities. The following deferred income taxes are
recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal net operating loss carryforward
|
|
$
|
18,802
|
|
|
$
|
22,590
|
|
State loss carryforward
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
Allowance for bad debts
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Other
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
23,442
|
|
|
|
28,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(23,375
|
)
|
|
|
(28,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred liability
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
available taxes in the carryback periods, projected future
taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. Accordingly, the Company has provided valuation
allowances to fully offset the net deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2009 and 2010. The $4,476 and $4,755 net
increase in the valuation allowance for 2009 and 2010,
respectively, primarily reflects the net increase in the federal
and state loss carryfoward deferred tax assets.
The Company has approximately $66,441 in federal net operating
loss carryforwards that expire between 2025 through 2030 and
approximately $54,068 in state loss carryforwards that begin to
expire in 2011. Section 382 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net
operating loss carryforwards that might be used to offset
taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant
changes in stock ownership. The Company believes that an annual
limit will be imposed by Section 382, however the Company
expects to fully utilize its net operating loss carryforwards
during their respective carryforward periods.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits recorded from the
January 1, 2007 adoption of
ASC 740-10
through the year ended December 31, 2010, and there are no
uncertain tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that
the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly increase within the next 12 months.
At December 31, 2010, we had four operating segments and
three reportable segments: Primo Bottled Water Exchange
(Exchange), Primo Refill (Refill) and
Primo Products (Products). With the acquisition of
the Refill Business, we manage and view our business as Primo
Water (Water) related and Products related.
F-23
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
However in 2011, we began to integrate the Exchange and Refill
operations to take advantage of synergies and to eliminate
duplicate operations and costs. In integrating the businesses we
have changed our internal management and reporting structure
such that Exchange and Refill no longer meet the requirements of
operating segments on a stand-alone basis. Beginning in 2011, we
have two operating segments and two reportable segments: Water
and Products. All previous periods have been retrospectively
revised to conform to this presentation.
Our Water segment includes our historical business of bottled
water exchange services and the Refill Business acquired in
November 2010 and the operations of a unit that previously was
an operating segment, but did not meet quantitative threshold
for reporting purposes.
Our Water segment sales consist of the sale of multi-gallon
purified bottled water (exchange services) and our self-serve
filtered drinking water vending service (refill services)
through retailers in each of the contiguous United States
and Canada. Our Water services are offered through point of
purchase display racks or self-serve filtered water vending
displays and recycling centers that are prominently located at
major retailers in space that is often underutilized.
As of December 31, 2010, we offered our Water services at
approximately 12,600 combined locations.
Our Products segment sells water dispensers that are designed to
dispense Primo and other dispenser-compatible bottled water. Our
Products sales are primarily generated through major
U.S. retailers. Our water dispensers are sold primarily
through a direct-import model, where we recognize revenues for
the sale of the water dispensers when title is transferred to
our retailer customers. We support retail sell-through with
limited domestic inventory. We design, market and arrange for
certification and inspection of our products.
We evaluate the financial results of these segments focusing
primarily on segment net sales and segment income (loss) from
operations before depreciation and amortization (segment
income (loss) from operations). We utilize segment net
sales and segment income (loss) from operations because we
believe they provide useful information for effectively
allocating our resources between business segments, evaluating
the health of our business segments based on metrics that
management can actively influence and gauging our investments
and our ability to service, incur or pay down debt.
Cost of sales for Water consists of costs for bottling and
related packaging materials and distribution costs for our
bottled water for our exchange services and servicing and
material costs for our refill services. Cost of sales for
Products consists of contract manufacturing, freight, duties and
warehousing costs of our water dispensers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for all segments
consist primarily of personnel costs for sales, marketing,
operations support and customer service, as well as other
supporting costs for operating each segment.
Expenses not specifically related to operating segments are
shown separately as Corporate. Corporate expenses are comprised
mainly of compensation and other related expenses for corporate
support, information systems, and human resources and
administration. Corporate expenses also include certain
professional fees and expenses and compensation of our Board of
Directors.
F-24
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents segment information for each of the
last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Segment Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
21,111
|
|
|
$
|
24,249
|
|
|
|
29,875
|
|
Products
|
|
|
13,758
|
|
|
|
22,824
|
|
|
|
14,741
|
|
Inter-company elimination
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(92)
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
34,647
|
|
|
$
|
46,981
|
|
|
$
|
44,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,767
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
(272)
|
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
Intercompany elimination
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(7,077
|
)
|
|
|
(4,789)
|
|
|
|
(8,922
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(3,618
|
)
|
|
|
(4,205)
|
|
|
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(13,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,917)
|
|
|
$
|
(9,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
3,210
|
|
|
$
|
3,615
|
|
|
$
|
4,191
|
|
Products
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,618
|
|
|
$
|
4,205
|
|
|
$
|
4,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
8,412
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
Products
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,420
|
|
|
$
|
2,424
|
|
|
$
|
6,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,286
|
|
|
$
|
131,630
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,368
|
|
|
$
|
139,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of the
Refill Business pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated
June 1, 2010. The Refill Business provided us with an
established platform to expand into the self-serve water refill
business. The self-serve water refill business is complementary
to our exchange business from both a product and operational
perspective. The total purchase price for the Refill Business
was approximately $109,095 (including the working capital
adjustment), which was paid with $74,474 in proceeds from the
IPO and $34,621 from the issuance of approximately 2,588 of our
common shares valued at $13.38 per share. The Refill Acquisition
has been accounted for as a business combination in accordance
with the acquisition method.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business
combination are recorded at fair value in accordance with
ASC 805 based upon appraisals obtained from an unrelated
third party valuation specialist. The purchase price exceeded
the fair value of the net assets acquired resulting in goodwill
of approximately $77,382. The identifiable intangible assets
consist primarily of customer lists and will be amortized over
15 years. Operations of the acquired
F-25
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
entity are included in the consolidated statement of operations
from the acquisition date. Fees and expenses associated with the
acquisition of the Refill Business were approximately $2,101.
This amount was included in selling, general and administrative
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets and
liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$
|
74,474
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
34,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
109,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Net current assets
|
|
$
|
3,728
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
19,054
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
77,382
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(1,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price
|
|
$
|
109,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts of net sales and earnings of the Refill Business
included in the Companys consolidated income statement
from the acquisition date to the year ending December 31,
2010, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma revenue and earnings for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010 presented below is based upon
the purchase price allocation and does not reflect any
anticipated operating efficiencies or cost savings from the
integration of the Refill Business into our business. Pro forma
adjustments have been made as if the acquisition had occurred as
of January 1 of the period presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
72,988
|
|
|
$
|
67,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
19,003
|
|
|
|
19,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These amounts have been calculated after applying the
Companys accounting policies and adjusting the results of
the Refill Business to reflect the additional depreciation and
amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair
value adjustments to property and equipment and intangible
assets had been as of January 1 of the period presented.
F-26
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
13.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
1,535
|
|
|
$
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired under capital lease or seller notes payable
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with the Refill
Acquisition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Conversion of Series B preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Conversion of Series C preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant modification charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends accrued not paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
In July, 2008, the Company and its Board of Directors made the
decision to divest the operations of its subsidiary, Prima
Bottled Water, Inc. (Prima) formerly Primo To Go,
LLC. As a result, the related assets, liabilities and results of
the operations of Prima are accounted for as discontinued
operations. In December 2009, the Company completed the
divesture by distributing the stock in Prima to existing
shareholders of the Company. Each shareholder received a number
of shares in Prima based upon such shareholders
proportionate ownership of our Series A, Series C and
common stock on an as converted basis as of the date of
distribution. This transaction is reflected as a dividend of
subsidiary stock in the statement of stockholders equity
(deficit) in the amount of $2,050, the book value of the net
assets of Prima as of the distribution date.
Net sales and operating results classified as discontinued
operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,888
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,930
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of assets held for sale
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(5,672
|
)
|
|
|
(3,587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, before income taxes
|
|
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(5,738
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
15.
|
Employee
Retirement Savings Plan
|
The Company has the Primo Water Corporation 401(k)
Plan & Trust retirement plan covering substantially
all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of age
and who have completed at least two months of service. Plan
participants may make before tax elective contributions up to
the maximum percentage of compensation and dollar amount allowed
under the Internal Revenue Code. Plan participants are 100%
vested in their elective contributions at all times and are
vested 25% per year of service for four years in the
Companys discretionary contributions. A year of service
for vesting purposes is 1,000 hours of service in a Plan
year. The Company did not make any matching contributions during
2008 or 2009, as the Companys matching contributions to
the plan were discretionary and determined with respect to each
plan year. In 2010, our Board of Directors established a Company
match of up to 50% of the employee contributions up to 6% of
their salaries, with 50% of the matching amount being contingent
upon our achievement of certain specified objectives to be
determined by our Board of Directors. Contribution expense for
the plan was approximately $31 in 2010.
On March 8, 2011, the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary Primo Refill Canada Corporation (Primo
Canada) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with
Culligan of Canada, Ltd. (the Seller) and Culligan
International Company (Culligan International and
together with the Seller, the Culligan Parties),
pursuant to which Primo Canada purchased certain of the
Sellers assets related to its bulk water exchange business
currently conducted in Canada (the Canada Bulk Water
Exchange Business). The purchase price for the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business was approximately $5,391, which
consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1,575 and the
issuance of 307 shares of the Companys common stock
having a value of approximately $3,816 (based upon a price per
share equal to the average of the closing price of the
Companys common stock for the 20 most recent trading days
prior to the closing date), and the assumption of certain
specified liabilities (the Canada Bulk Water
Transaction). The Canada Bulk Water Transaction was
intended to be effective from an economic standpoint as of
December 31, 2010 and, as a result, the cash portion of the
purchase price was reduced by approximately $60, which the
parties mutually agreed represented a reasonable approximation
of the net earnings of the Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
between January 1, 2011 and March 8, 2011. The Canada
Bulk Water Exchange Business provides refill and delivery of
water in 18-liter containers to commercial retailers in Canada
for resale to consumers.
On March 8, 2011, the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary Primo Products, LLC (Primo Products)
entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Omnifrio Beverage
Company, LLC (Omnifrio). The Omnifrio Asset Purchase
Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions therein, Primo Products will purchase certain of
Omnifrios intellectual property and other assets (the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business) for a
purchase price of up to $13,150, which consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
a cash payment at closing of $2,000;
|
|
|
the issuance at closing of 501 shares of the Companys
common stock having a value of $6,150 (based upon a price per
share equal to the average of the closing price of the
Companys common stock for the 20 most recent trading days
prior to the date of the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement);
|
|
|
a cash payment of $2,000 on the
15-month
anniversary of the closing date (subject to the Companys
setoff rights in the Omnifrio Purchase Agreement);
|
|
|
up to $3,000 in cash milestone payments; and
|
|
|
the assumption of certain specified liabilities relating to the
Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business.
|
F-28
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
17.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Information
(Unaudited)
|
The following tables set forth a summary of our quarterly
financial information for each of the four quarters ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
12,173
|
|
|
$
|
10,899
|
|
|
$
|
12,706
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6,922
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
8,591
|
|
|
|
8,950
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
2,802
|
|
|
|
3,263
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
13,845
|
|
|
|
12,986
|
|
|
|
16,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
(2,087
|
)
|
|
|
(3,897
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(936
|
)
|
|
|
(1,031
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
|
(4,946
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
|
(4,946
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,416
|
)
|
|
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
|
(4,946
|
)
|
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant
modification charges
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(2,896
|
)
|
|
|
(5,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,886
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
9,567
|
|
|
$
|
14,933
|
|
|
$
|
14,595
|
|
|
$
|
7,886
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
7,652
|
|
|
|
12,716
|
|
|
|
12,279
|
|
|
|
6,124
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
11,291
|
|
|
|
16,196
|
|
|
|
15,707
|
|
|
|
9,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(1,724
|
)
|
|
|
(1,263
|
)
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
(1,818
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
|
|
(2,467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
|
(1,823
|
)
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
|
|
(2,467
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(2,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,687
|
)
|
|
|
(1,694
|
)
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
|
(5,380
|
)
|
Preferred dividends, beneficial conversion and warrant
modification charges
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(3,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,824
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.78
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.22
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to common
shareholders
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
9,297
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
17,203
|
|
Bottles, net
|
|
|
2,965
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
37,490
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
11,980
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
81,341
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
152,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,834
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, capital leases and notes
payable
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
15,359
|
|
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable, net of current
portion
|
|
|
20,613
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
36,910
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value
70,000 shares authorized, 19,362 shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
19
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value
65,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
223,532
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(115,836
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
115,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
152,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,139
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6,922
|
|
|
|
12,113
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
Acquisition-related costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
10,650
|
|
|
|
18,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(698
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(1,924
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(3,123
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
19,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,114
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
|
|
(2,096
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
5,657
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(2,239
|
)
|
Purchases of bottles, net of disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Acquisition of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,576
|
)
|
Additions to and acquisitions of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(4,469
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings from prior revolving line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under senior revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
Payments under senior revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,302
|
)
|
Notes payable and capital lease payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in book overdraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid equity issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
522
|
|
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
F-33
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Business
Primo Water Corporation (together with its consolidated
subsidiaries, Primo, we,
our, the Company) is a rapidly growing
provider of multi-gallon purified bottled water, self-serve
filtered drinking water and water dispensers sold through major
retailers in the United States and Canada.
Initial
Public Offering and Acquisition
On November 10, 2010, the Company completed the initial
public offering (IPO) of 8,333 shares of its
common stock at a price of $12.00 per share. In addition on
November 18, 2010, the Company issued an additional
1,250 shares upon the exercise of the over-allotment option
by the underwriters of its IPO. The net proceeds of the IPO
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions were
approximately $106,900.
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of
Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan of Canada, Ltd. (the
Refill Business or Refill Acquisition)
pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 1, 2010
(the Asset Purchase Agreement). The total purchase
price for the Refill Business was approximately $109,095
(including the working capital adjustment), which was paid with
$74,474 in proceeds from the IPO and $34,621 from the issuance
of approximately 2,588 common shares at an average price of
$13.38 per share on November 10, 2010.
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with our accounting practices
described in our audited consolidated financial statements for
the year ending December 31, 2010, and are unaudited. The
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes for the year ended
December 31, 2010. The accompanying interim consolidated
financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and,
accordingly, do not include all the disclosures required by
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(GAAP) with respect to annual financial statements.
In managements opinion, the interim consolidated financial
statements include all adjustments, which consist only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the
Companys results of operations for the periods presented.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized for the sale of multi-gallon purified
bottled water upon either the delivery of inventory to the
retail store or the purchase by the consumer. Revenue is either
recognized as an exchange transaction (where a discount is
provided on the purchase of a multi-gallon bottle of purified
water for the return of an empty multi-gallon bottle) or a
non-exchange transaction. Revenues on exchange transactions are
recognized net of the exchange discount. Self-serve filtered
water revenue is recognized at the time the water is filtered
which is measured by the water dispensing equipment meter.
Our water dispensers are sold primarily through a direct-import
model, where we recognize revenue when title is transferred to
our retail customers. We have no contractual obligation to
accept returns of water dispensers nor do we guarantee water
dispenser sales. However, we will at times accept returns or
issue credits for water dispensers that have manufacturer
defects or that were damaged in transit. Revenues of water
dispensers are recognized net of an estimated allowance for
returns using an average return rate based upon historical
experience.
In addition, we offer certain incentives such as coupons and
rebates that are netted against and reduce net sales in the
consolidated statements of operations. With the purchase of
certain of our water dispensers we include a coupon
F-34
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
for a free multi-gallon bottle of water. No revenue is
recognized with respect to the redemption of the coupon for a
free three-and five-gallon bottle of water and the estimated
cost of the three- and five-gallon bottle of water is included
in cost of sales.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
We classify intangible assets into three categories:
(1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to
amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives
not subject to amortization and (3) goodwill. We determine
the useful lives of our identifiable intangible assets after
considering the specific facts and circumstances related to each
intangible asset. Factors we consider when determining useful
lives include the contractual term of any agreement related to
the asset, the historical performance of the asset, the
Companys long-term strategy for using the asset, any laws
or other local regulations which could impact the useful life of
the asset, and other economic factors, including competition and
specific market conditions. Intangible assets that are deemed to
have definite lives are amortized, primarily on a straight-line
basis, over their useful lives.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful
lives, including trademarks and goodwill, for impairment
annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate
that assets might be impaired. Our Company performs these annual
impairment reviews as of the first day of our fourth quarter.
The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if
necessary. The first step involves a comparison of the fair
value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. The fair value
is estimated based on a number of factors including operating
results, business plans and future cash flows. If the carrying
amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second
step of the process is performed which compares the implied
value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying value of
the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of
the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value
of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. No impairment charge was considered
necessary at March 31, 2011. For indefinite-lived
intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount
exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an
amount equal to that excess.
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures, for financial assets and liabilities.
ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of
ASC 820 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. ASC 820 also describes three
levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 observable inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 unobservable inputs in which there is
little or no market data available, which require the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial
instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued expenses,
approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.
Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for
loans with similar terms, the carrying value of long-term debt,
capital leases and notes payable approximates fair value.
F-35
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Concentrations
of Risk
Our principal financial instruments subject to potential
concentration of credit risk are cash, trade receivables,
accounts payable and accrued expenses. We invest our funds in a
highly rated institution and believe the financial risks
associated with cash are minimal. At March 31, 2011,
approximately $640, of our cash on deposit exceeded the insured
limits.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers
financial condition and maintain allowances for doubtful
accounts that we believe are sufficient to provide for losses
that may be sustained on realization of accounts receivable. We
had three customers that accounted for approximately 39%, 18%
and 10% of net sales for the three months ending March 31,
2010. We had two customers that accounted for approximately 39%
and 22% of net sales for the three months ending March 31,
2011. We had two customers that accounted for approximately 35%
and 12% of total trade receivables at December 31, 2010 and
two customers that accounted for approximately 34% and 12% of
total trade receivables at March 31, 2011.
Basic and
Diluted Net loss Per Share
Net loss per share has been computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.
Diluted amounts per share include the dilutive impact, if any,
of the Companys outstanding potential common shares, such
as options and warrants and convertible preferred stock.
Potential common shares that are anti-dilutive are excluded from
the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2011, stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock and warrants with
respect to an aggregate of 1,029 and 355 shares, as well as
4,301 and 0 shares of convertible preferred stock, have
been excluded from the computation of the number of shares used
in the diluted earnings per share, respectively. These shares
have been excluded because the Company incurred a net loss for
each of these periods and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
No. 2010-28
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for
Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. This
update provides amendments to ASC Topic 350
Intangibles, Goodwill and Other that requires an entity to
perform Step 2 impairment test even if a reporting unit has zero
or negative carrying amount. The first step is to identify
potential impairments by comparing the estimated fair value of a
reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the
carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the estimated fair
value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of
impairment, if any. The second step is to determine the implied
fair value of the reporting units goodwill, measured in
the same manner as goodwill is recognized in a business
combination, and compare that amount with the carrying amount of
the goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting units
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
ASU
No. 2010-28
is effective beginning January 1, 2011. As a result of this
standard, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under
current practice. We do not expect ASU
No. 2010-28
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-29,
which contains updated accounting guidance to clarify the
acquisition date that should be used for reporting pro forma
financial information when comparative financial statements are
issued. This update requires that a company should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the
business combination(s) that occurred during the current year
had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual
reporting period only. This update also requires disclosure of
the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments. The provisions of this update, which are to be
applied prospectively, are effective for business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
F-36
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The
impact of this update on the Companys consolidated
financial statements will depend on the size and nature of
future business combinations.
Refill
Business
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of the
Refill Business pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated
June 1, 2010. The Refill Business provided us with an
established platform to expand into the self-serve filtered
drinking water vending business (refill services). The refill
services are complementary to our exchange services from both a
product and operational perspective. The total purchase price
for the Refill Business was approximately $109,095 (including
the working capital adjustment), which was paid with $74,474 in
proceeds from the IPO and $34,621 from the issuance of
approximately 2,588 of our common shares valued at $13.38 per
share. The Refill Acquisition has been accounted for as a
business combination in accordance with the acquisition method.
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business
combination are recorded at fair value in accordance with
ASC 805 based upon appraisals obtained from an unrelated
third party valuation specialist. The purchase price exceeded
the fair value of the net assets acquired resulting in goodwill
of approximately $77,452. The identifiable intangible assets
consist primarily of customer lists and will be amortized over
15 years. Operations of the acquired entity are included in
the consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition
date. Fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of the
Refill Business were approximately $2,101.
The purchase price has been allocated to the assets and
liabilities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration
|
|
$
|
74,474
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
34,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
109,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Net current assets
|
|
$
|
3,728
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
18,984
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
10,300
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
77,452
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(1,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate purchase price
|
|
$
|
109,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unaudited pro forma revenue and earnings presented below is
based upon the purchase price allocation and does not reflect
any anticipated operating efficiencies or cost savings from the
integration of the Refill Business into our business. Pro forma
adjustments have been made as if the acquisition had occurred as
of January 1, 2010. The amounts have been calculated after
applying the Companys accounting policies and adjusting
the results of the
F-37
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Refill Business to reflect the additional depreciation and
amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair
value adjustments to property and equipment and intangible
assets had been as of January 1, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
14,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
18,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
of Culligan Canadas assets related to its bulk water
exchange business (the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business). The consideration given for the Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business was approximately $5,400, which
consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1,600 and the
issuance of 307 shares of our common stock, and the
assumption of certain specified liabilities. The Canada Bulk
Water Exchange Business provides refill and delivery of water in
18-liter containers to commercial retailers in Canada for resale
to consumers. The acquisition of the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business expands our existing exchange service offering and
provides us with an immediate network of regional operators and
major retailers in Canada with approximately 780 retail
locations. The Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business has been
accounted for as a business combination in accordance with the
acquisition method. The Company has recorded provisional amounts
for this business combination as of March 31, 2011. The
Company expects to finalize the fair value assignments to assets
acquired and liabilities assumed during the second quarter,
which may result in changes to the provisional amounts reflected
as of March 31, 2011.
Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business
On April 11, 2011, we completed the acquisition of certain
intellectual property and other assets (the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business) from Omnifrio Beverage
Company, LLC (Omnifrio) for total consideration of
up to approximately $13,150, consisting of: (i) a cash
payment at closing of $2,000; (ii) the issuance at closing
of 501 shares of the Companys common stock;
(iii) a cash payment of $2,000 on the
15-month
anniversary of the closing date (subject to the Companys
setoff rights in the asset purchase agreement); (iv) up to
$3,000 in cash milestone payments; and (v) the assumption
of certain specified liabilities relating to the Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business. The Omnifrio Single-Serve
Beverage Business will be accounted for as a business
combination in accordance with the acquisition method.
The Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage Business primarily consists
of technology related to single-serve cold carbonated beverage
appliances and consumable flavor cups, or S-cups,
and
CO2
cylinders used with the appliances to make a variety of cold
beverages. The acquisition of the Omnifrio Single-Serve Beverage
Business serves as an entry point into the U.S. market for
carbonated beverages and the rapidly growing self-carbonating
appliance and single-serve beverage segments.
F-38
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
3.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill as summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
77,415
|
|
Acquisition of Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
341
|
|
Other
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
81,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related items
|
|
$
|
695
|
|
Accrued severance
|
|
|
240
|
|
Accrued professional and other expenses
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
3
|
|
Accrued sales tax payable
|
|
|
95
|
|
Customer bottle deposits
|
|
|
640
|
|
Accrued receipts not invoiced
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
Other
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Long-Term
Debt, Capital Leases and Notes Payable
|
Long-term debt, capital leases and notes payable are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Senior revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
20,582
|
|
Notes payable and capital leases
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,624
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, notes payable and capital leases, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
20,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We entered into a $40,000 senior revolving credit facility in
November 2010 that was amended in April 2011, with Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A. and Branch
Banking & Trust Company (Senior Revolving
Credit Facility) that replaced our previous loan
agreement. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility has a three-year
term and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the
Company.
Interest on the outstanding borrowings under the Senior
Revolving Credit Facility is payable at our option at either a
floating base rate plus an interest rate spread or a floating
rate of LIBOR plus an interest rate spread. Both the interest
rate spreads and the commitment fee rate are determined from a
pricing grid based on our total leverage ratio. The Senior
Revolving Credit Facility also provides for letters of credit
issued to our vendors, which reduce the
F-39
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
amount available for cash borrowings. We are required to pay a
commitment fee on the unused amounts of the commitments under
the Senior Revolving Credit Facility. At March 31, 2011,
the base rate and floating LIBOR borrowings outstanding were
$5,582 and $15,000, respectively, at interest rates of 5.25% and
3.27%, respectively. At March 31, 2011, there were no
outstanding letters of credit under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility. The availability under the Senior Revolving Credit
Facility was approximately $7,200, based upon the maximum
leverage ratio allowed at March 31, 2011.
The Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains various
restrictive covenants and the following financial covenants:
(i) a maximum total leverage ratio that for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 is set at 3.25 to 1.0 and steps up to
3.5 to 1.0 for the period beginning April 1, 2011 and
ending June 30, 2011, steps down to 2.75 to 1.0 for the
period beginning July 1, 2011 and ending September 30,
2011 and further steps down to 2.5 to 1.0 for the period
beginning October 1, 2011 and continuing until the
termination of the Senior Revolving Credit Facility; (ii) a
minimum EBITDA threshold that is currently set at $7,500 and
increases to $9,000 for the twelve-month period ended
June 30, 2011; (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio
of 3.0 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ended
September 30, 2011; and (iv) a maximum amount of
capital expenditures of $25,000 for the year ending
December 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011, the Company is
in compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Senior
Revolving Credit Facility.
|
|
6.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
2004
Stock Plan
In 2004, our Board of Directors adopted the Primo Water
Corporation 2004 Stock Plan (the 2004 Plan) for
employees, including officers, non-employee directors and
non-employee consultants. The Plan provides for the issue of
incentive or nonqualified stock options and restricted common
stock. The Company has reserved 431 shares of common stock
for issuance under the Plan. The Company does not intend to
issue any additional awards under the 2004 Plan; however, all
outstanding awards will remain in effect and will continue to be
governed by their existing terms.
2010
Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
In April 2010, our stockholders approved the 2010 Omnibus
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2010 Plan). The 2010
Plan is limited to employees, officers, non-employee directors,
consultants and advisors. The 2010 Plan provides for the
issuance of incentive or nonqualified stock options, restricted
stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, cash-
or stock-based performance awards and other stock-based awards.
The Company has reserved 719 shares of common stock for
issuance under the 2010 Plan.
Stock
Option Activity
We measure the fair value of each stock option grant at the date
of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
weighted-average fair value per share of the options granted
during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $5.98. The
following assumptions were used in arriving at the fair value of
options granted during the three months ended March 31,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of options in years
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 compensation
expense related to stock options was approximately $118 and is
included in selling, general and administrative expenses. For
the three months ended March 31, 2011,
F-40
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
compensation expense related to stock options was approximately
$2, which is included in selling, general and administrative
expenses. A summary of awards under the 2004 Plan and 2010 Plan
at March 31, 2011, and changes during the three months then
ended is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
13.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
12.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
12.86
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
13.14
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no options exercised during the three months ended
March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, there was
approximately $746 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested stock-based compensation grants. This
unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of approximately 3.0 years.
Restricted
Stock Award Activity
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2011, we
awarded 105 shares of restricted stock awards, and 81
restricted stock units, respectively, which generally cliff-vest
annually over a three-year period. During the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2011, we recognized compensation expense
of $40 and $186, related to these awards, which is included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses. A summary of the
restricted stock activity for the three months then ended
March 31, 2011, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighed Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
12.75
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
12.33
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
12.62
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
12.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011, there was approximately $1,474 of
total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated
forfeitures, related to non-vested restricted stock awards. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 2.5 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
In April 2010, our stockholders approved the 2010 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the 2010 ESPP) which was effective
upon the consummation of the Companys initial public
offering. The 2010 ESPP provides for the purchase of common
stock and is generally available to all employees. The Company
has reserved 24 shares of common stock for issuance under
the 2010 ESPP.
F-41
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
7.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
In the normal course of business the Company may be involved in
various claims and legal actions. Management believes that the
outcome of such legal actions will not have a significant
adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
The Company has incurred operating losses since inception. For
the three months ended March 31, 2011, there is a $190
income tax provision resulting from recognition of a deferred
tax liability related to tax deductible goodwill. There was no
income tax provision (benefit) for prior periods.
Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code imposes
an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss
carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a
corporation has undergone significant changes in stock
ownership. The Company believes that an annual limit will be
imposed by Section 382, however the Company expects to
fully utilize its net operating loss carryforwards during their
respective carryforward periods.
At March 31, 2011, we had two operating segments and two
reportable segments: Primo Water (Water) and Primo
Products (Products). The Water segment includes our
historical business of bottled water exchange services
(Exchange), the Refill Business (Refill)
acquired in November 2010, the Canada Bulk Water Exchange
Business (Canada Exchange) acquired in March 2011
and the operations of a unit that previously was an operating
segment, but did not meet quantitative threshold for reporting
purposes. Historically, we have disclosed Exchange, Refill and
Products as reportable segments. However in 2011, we have begun
to integrate the Exchange and Refill operations to take
advantage of synergies and to eliminate duplicate operations and
costs. In integrating the businesses we have changed our
internal management and reporting structure such that Exchange
and Refill no longer meet the requirements of operating segments
on a stand-alone basis. The recently acquired Canada Exchange
business will be reported within the Water segment.
Our Water segment sales consist of the sale of multi-gallon
purified bottled water (exchange services) and our self-serve
filtered drinking water vending service (refill services)
through retailers in each of the contiguous United States and
Canada. Our Water services are offered through point of purchase
display racks or self-serve filtered water vending displays and
recycling centers that are prominently located at major
retailers in space that is often underutilized. As of
March 31, 2011, we offered our Water services at
approximately 14,600 locations.
Our Products segment sells water dispensers that are designed to
dispense Primo and other dispenser-compatible bottled water. Our
Products sales are primarily generated through major
U.S. retailers. Our water dispensers are sold primarily
through a direct-import model, where we recognize revenues for
the sale of the water dispensers when title is transferred to
our retailer customers. We support retail sell-through with
domestic inventory. We design, market and arrange for
certification and inspection of our products.
We evaluate the financial results of these segments focusing
primarily on segment net sales and segment income (loss) from
operations before depreciation and amortization (segment
income (loss) from operations). We utilize segment net
sales and segment income (loss) from operations because we
believe they provide useful information for effectively
allocating our resources between business segments, evaluating
the health of our business segments based on metrics that
management can actively influence and gauging our investments
and our ability to service, incur or pay down debt.
Cost of sales for Water consists of costs for bottling and
related packaging materials and distribution costs for our
bottled water for our exchange services and servicing and
material costs for our refill services. Cost of sales for
Products consists of contract manufacturing, freight, duties and
warehousing costs of our water dispensers.
F-42
PRIMO
WATER CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Selling, general and administrative expenses for all segments
consist primarily of personnel costs for sales, marketing,
operations support and customer service, as well as other
supporting costs for operating each segment.
Expenses not specifically related to operating segments are
shown separately as Corporate. Corporate expenses are comprised
mainly of compensation and other related expenses for corporate
support, information systems, and human resources and
administration. Corporate expenses also include certain
professional fees and expenses and compensation of our Board of
Directors.
The following table presents segment information for the three
months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Segment net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
5,920
|
|
|
$
|
13,146
|
|
Products
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
$
|
17,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
3,194
|
|
Products
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(995
|
)
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
1,703
|
|
Products
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
$
|
467
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
563
|
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
142,618
|
|
Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,107
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-43
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
Culligan Holding S.àr.l
Culligan International Company
Culligan of Canada, Ltd.:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of the
Culligan Store Solutions Group (the Group) a business of
Culligan Holding S.àr.l as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the related combined statements of operations, parent
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years
then ended. These combined financial statements are the
responsibility of the Groups management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined
financial position of the Culligan Store Solutions Group as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
June 4, 2010
F-44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Service parts
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,202
|
|
|
|
7,932
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
21,900
|
|
Other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Intercompany receivable from Parent, net
|
|
|
21,558
|
|
|
|
16,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
45,956
|
|
|
|
41,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
58,381
|
|
|
|
53,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Parent Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
4,013
|
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
Parent equity
|
|
|
54,638
|
|
|
|
49,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and Parent equity
|
|
$
|
58,381
|
|
|
|
53,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements
F-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
26,017
|
|
|
|
25,746
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
13,643
|
|
|
|
13,635
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
19,008
|
|
|
|
20,777
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
7,009
|
|
|
|
4,969
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements
F-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
47,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
$
|
3,132
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
|
49,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
$
|
4,344
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
54,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements
F-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities, excluding the effects of acquisitions and
divestitures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
3,872
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Service parts
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
7,017
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activity
|
|
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with Parent, net
|
|
|
(4,916
|
)
|
|
|
(4,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activity
|
|
|
(4,916
|
)
|
|
|
(4,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements
F-48
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
|
|
1.
|
The Group
and a Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Culligan Store Solutions Group (the Group) is primarily engaged
in the business of providing (a) vended water machines,
owned by the Group, to filter and dispense drinking water to
consumers at retail locations, (b) water treatment
equipment, owned by the Group, to filter water for the
retailers use within their store locations, and
(c) empty one-, three-, and five-gallon refillable water
bottles to the retailer for their sale to consumers to carry the
dispensed filtered water. The machines and water treatment
equipment are owned by the Group and placed at retail locations
for the purpose of providing the filtration of water. At
December 31, 2009, the Group had vended water machines at
approximately 4,500 retail locations.
The Group is owned by Culligan Store Solutions, LLC (CSS), which
is owned by Culligan International Company (CIC), and by
Culligan of Canada Ltd. (Culligan of Canada), all of which are
wholly owned indirect subsidiaries of Culligan Holding
S.àr.l (Culligan Holding) (collectively referred to herein,
as the Parent).
|
|
(b)
|
Principles
of Combination and Basis of Presentation
|
These combined financial statements include the accounts and
results of the Group. During the periods presented, the
Groups operations were components of the Parent. The
financial statements have been carved out from the books and
records of the Parent and have been prepared by management using
the results of operations and basis of assets of the Group. The
statements of operations include all items of revenue and income
generated by the Group, all items of expense directly incurred
by it, and expenses charged or allocated to it by the Parent.
The accompanying combined financial statements do not reflect
any allocation of general corporate debt or interest expense
incurred by the Parent in financing its activities as it is not
specifically identifiable to the Group.
The Group operates in a single business segment providing
filtration of drinking water to consumers through self-service
vending machines, along with empty bottles sold to retailers for
resale and filtration systems for in-store use in retail stores.
The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires that management make certain
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the dates of the combined financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. These estimates and assumptions include, but
are not limited to: the recoverability of accounts receivable,
useful lives of property and equipment, valuation of goodwill,
intangible assets, deferred tax assets, fixed assets and repair
parts, and the ability to estimate accrued revenues.
Water dispensing machines placed at the retailers are used by
retail customers on a self-serve basis. Water treatment
equipment is placed at retailers location for the retailer
to filter water used in its store. Revenue is earned at the time
the water is filtered which is measured by the machine or
equipment meter. At December 31, 2009, the Group had
approximately 4,500 vending machines, making the reading of each
machine meter at the end of each reporting period impractical.
Consequently, the Group estimates the revenue from the last time
each machine meter was read until the end of the reporting
period, based on the most current average daily volume of
filtered water of
F-49
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
each machine. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Group recorded approximately $1,051 and $1,050,
respectively, of such estimated revenues, which for both
year-ends represents an average of approximately 22 days of
use per machine.
The Group recognizes revenue when empty bottles are shipped and
the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss,
collection of the relevant receivable is probable, persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed
or determinable. Shipping and other transportation costs charged
to buyers are recorded in cost of sales.
Accounts receivable consist principally of amounts due from
retailers located in the United States and Canada. Accounts
receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. The Group maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts
for estimated losses inherent in its accounts receivable
portfolio. In establishing the required allowance, management
considers historical losses adjusted to take into account
current market conditions and the Groups customers
financial condition, the amount of receivables in dispute,
current receivables aging, and current payment patterns. Account
balances are charged off against the allowance after all means
of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery
is considered remote. The Group does not have any
off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers.
Inventories consist primarily of finished goods, which are empty
bottles for sale and are valued at the lower of cost or
realizable value, with cost determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Miscellaneous selling supplies such as
labels are expensed when incurred.
CSS is a single member limited liability company and wholly
owned by CIC, a Delaware Corporation. For U.S. federal
income tax purposes, CSS is treated as a division of CIC, which
files a consolidated federal income tax return. CIC pays all
federal and state income taxes for CSS and the payments have
been reflected as intercompany transactions within Parent
equity. Culligan of Canada, which includes the Groups
business in Canada, files individual Canadian income tax
returns. For purposes of the combined financial statements
presented herein, the Group provided for income taxes as if they
were separate filing taxable entities.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
Beginning with the adoption of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, included in FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic
740-10,
Income Taxes Overall, as of January 1, 2009, the
Group recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if
those positions are more likely than not of being sustained.
Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest
amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized.
Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the
period in which the change in judgment occurs. Prior to the
adoption of
F-50
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
Interpretation No. 48, the Group recognized the effect of
income tax positions only if such positions were probable of
being sustained.
|
|
(i)
|
Foreign
Currency Translation
|
The Groups operations are in the U.S. and Canada.
Assets and liabilities denominated in Canadian dollars are
translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of
exchange existing at period-end. Revenues, expenses, gains, and
losses are translated at average monthly exchange rates.
Translation adjustments are included in the combined statements
of Parent company equity and comprehensive income and cash flows.
Service parts consist primarily of operating components used to
maintain vending machines. Service parts are stated at the lower
of cost or market with cost determined using the FIFO method.
|
|
(k)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of
property and equipment is calculated on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
2 6 years
|
|
Vending machines
|
|
|
2 10 years
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
2 6 years
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
2 6 years
|
|
Information technology
|
|
|
2 6 years
|
|
Depreciation expense totaled $2,114 and $3,495 for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Group incurs maintenance costs on its major equipment.
Maintenance, repair and minor refurbishment costs are charged to
expense as incurred, while additions, renewals, and improvements
are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement of an asset, the
related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts.
|
|
(l)
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The Group is a component of a larger reporting unit at the
Parent level. Goodwill reflected in these financial statements
represents an allocation of the goodwill, recorded by Culligan
Holding. The relative fair value approach was used as the basis
for the allocation and measured based on the relative fair value
of the Group and the portion of the reporting unit to be
retained. This allocated amount has been reflected retroactively
back to December 31, 2008. Goodwill is not amortized but is
instead tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at
least annually in accordance with Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 350, Intangibles
Goodwill and Other (ASC 350). Culligan Holding completed its
annual goodwill impairment tests as of December 31, 2009
and 2008 and determined that goodwill was not impaired during
these years.
|
|
(m)
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
The Group reviews whether events or circumstances of any
long-lived assets have occurred that indicate the remaining
estimated useful lives of those assets may warrant revision or
that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable.
If events or circumstances indicate that the long-lived assets
should be reviewed for possible impairment, the Group uses
financial projections to assess whether future cash flows on a
nondiscounted basis related to the tested assets are likely to
exceed the recorded carrying amount of those assets, to
determine whether a
F-51
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
write-down is appropriate. Should an impairment be identified, a
loss would be recorded to the extent that the carrying value of
the impaired assets exceeds their fair value as determined by
valuation techniques appropriate in the circumstance, which
could include the use of similar projections on a discounted
basis. No such events or circumstances were identified during
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
(n)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
Financial instruments consist primarily of accounts receivable,
accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts
of such instruments are considered to be representative of their
respective fair values due to the short-term maturity of the
instruments.
|
|
(o)
|
Concentrations
of Risk
|
One customer accounted for approximately 65% and 63% of the
Groups revenues in 2009 and 2008 and approximately 57% and
59% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. There is no significant supplier, product
line, credit, geographic, or other concentrations that could
expose the Group to adverse near term severe financial impacts.
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs
were $52 and $42 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Advertising expenses are presented as part
of selling, general, and administrative expenses in the
accompanying combined statements of operations.
The Group participates in insurance programs sponsored by the
Parent. The Group retains the risk for U.S. claims arising
for general liability (up to $250), automobile (up to $100), and
workers compensation (up to $500). Coverage for individual
claims in excess of these limits is covered by policies
purchased from insurance providers by the Parent. There were no
claims in excess of the retained risk for 2009 and 2008. The
cost of medical insurance for U.S. employees and insurance
policies for general liability, automobile, and workers
compensation is allocated to the Group based upon premium
computations.
|
|
(r)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Group does not have any stock compensation plans. One
employee of the Group participates in a stock incentive plan and
special bonus plan sponsored by Culligan Ltd. (the ultimate
owner of Culligan Holding). The total compensation cost of both
plans was $9 and $35 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, and has
been reflected in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
(s) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
The following are summaries of accounting pronouncements that
were either recently adopted or may become applicable to the
Groups combined financial statements. It should be noted,
effective with the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the
Group adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC
Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC 105).
ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification) as the source of authoritative
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) recognized
by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities and it is
not intended to change or alter previously existing
U.S. GAAP titles and references to accounting standards
that have been updated to reflect ASC references, where
applicable.
F-52
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
In February 2008, the FASB issued updated guidance related to
fair value measurements, which is included in the Codification
in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC 820), which among other things, partially deferred the
effective date of ASC 820 to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities. In 2008, the Group adopted the
provisions of ASC 820 with respect to financial assets and
liabilities. The application of the provisions of ASC 820
related to nonfinancial assets and liabilities, effective
January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the
Groups combined financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised guidance on how
acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred,
identifiable assets, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling
interest, and goodwill acquired in a business combination. This
guidance is included in ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations
(ASC 805), and ASC 810, Consolidations (ASC
810). ASC 805 and 810 require most identifiable assets,
liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in
a business combination to be recorded at full fair
value and require noncontrolling interests (previously
referred to as minority interests) to be recorded as a component
of equity, which changes the accounting for transactions with
noncontrolling interest holders. Both statements are effective
for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and
earlier adoption is prohibited. ASC 805 will be applied to
business combinations occurring after the effective date.
ASC 810 will be applied prospectively to all noncontrolling
interests, including any that arose before the effective date.
All of the Groups subsidiaries are wholly owned, so the
adoption of ASC 810 is not expected to impact its financial
position and results of operations. The Group is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting ASC 805 on its financial
position and results of operations.
|
|
(t)
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
|
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2009-13,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements (EITF Issue
No. 08-1,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). ASU
2009-13
amends
ASC 605-25,
Revenue Recognition Multiple-Element
Arrangements, to eliminate the requirement that all
undelivered elements have vendor specific objective evidence of
selling price (VSOE) or third-party evidence of selling price
(TPE) before an entity can recognize the portion of an overall
arrangement fee that is attributable to items that already have
been delivered. In the absence of VSOE and TPE for one or more
delivered or undelivered elements in a multiple-element
arrangement, entities will be required to estimate the selling
prices of those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be
allocated to each element (both delivered and undelivered items)
based on their relative selling prices, regardless of whether
those selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based
on the entitys estimated selling price. Application of the
residual method of allocating an overall arrangement
fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted upon adoption of ASU
2009-13.
Additionally, the new guidance will require entities to disclose
more information about their multiple-element revenue
arrangements. ASU
2009-13 is
effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Group
expects that the adoption of ASU
2009-13 will
not have a material impact on its combined financial statements.
F-53
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
The following table details the changes in the allowance for
doubtful accounts for 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Credits
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment at December 31, 2009 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Vending machines
|
|
|
24,111
|
|
|
|
21,581
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Information technology
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
24,528
|
|
|
|
21,990
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(16,326
|
)
|
|
|
(14,058
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
8,202
|
|
|
|
7,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The net carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles, Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
2,569
|
|
|
|
24,469
|
|
Acquired during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
Acquired during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
21,900
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
23,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net carrying amount of other intangibles at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 is comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Intangibles, Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
$
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
On September 30, 2004, Culligan Holding acquired CIC,
Culligan of Canada and their then affiliates in a transaction
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The
goodwill and customer relationship intangible assets recorded
herein arose from this acquisition. Goodwill was allocated to
the Group based on the relative fair value of the Group and the
portion of the reporting unit to be retained. The customer
relationship intangible assets that arose from the
September 30, 2004 acquisition were specifically identified
to the Group.
None of the Parents trademarks are used exclusively in the
Groups business. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
gross carrying value of the customer relationships was $3,779
and $3,714, respectively, and the accumulated amortization was
$1,984 and $1,579, respectively. Estimated amortization expense,
for customer relationships, is $374, $374, $374, $374, and $299
in each of the next five years, respectively, and $0 in 2015 and
beyond.
Accrued liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Rebates
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Dealer service fees
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Other taxes
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Other
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income before income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
6,861
|
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,009
|
|
|
|
4,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
253
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by
applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%
to income before income taxes as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Computed expected tax expense
|
|
$
|
2,453
|
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
rate differential
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2665
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. In assessing the realizability of
deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences become deductible. Management considers the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. Based on this review, a valuation allowance on the
deferred tax assets has not been recorded as there was no
significant negative evidence that such an allowance was
required in the
F-56
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
foreseeable future. The tax effects of temporary differences
that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax
assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2009
and 2008 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowance for doubtful
accounts
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Inventories, principally due to reserves and additional costs
inventoried for tax purposes
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in
depreciation
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in
depreciation
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as follows in
the balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(1,759
|
)
|
|
|
(1,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Related-Party
Transactions
|
The Group participates in the cash management systems of the
Parent. All cash funding requirements have been met by CIC and
all cash received by the Group has either been transferred to
CIC (in the United States) or retained by Culligan of Canada (in
Canada). All of the Group disbursements are paid through CIC or
Culligan of Canada on the Groups behalf. The Groups
transactions with the Parent reflected on the combined
statements of cash flows consist principally of the intercompany
receivable from the Parent, net on the accompanying balance
sheets.
|
|
(b)
|
Expenses
Charged by the Parent
|
The combined statements of operations for the Group include all
direct costs of the Group, as well as certain corporate costs
directly identified with the Group and allocated to the Group by
the Parent. Charges for stop-loss premiums for general
liability, automobile, and workers compensation insurance
are allocated to the Group based upon historical experience.
Costs for employee health and dental insurance are based on a
predetermined rate, which combines premiums and claims. Expenses
allocated by CIC for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 were $654 and $540, respectively, and are reflected in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
statements of operations. In the opinion of management, the
costs allocated have been determined on a basis that is believed
to be reasonable for a group of businesses operating within the
structure of a larger parent
F-57
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
company. However, the costs allocated are not necessarily
indicative of the level of expenses that might have been
incurred by the Group operating as a stand-alone entity. The
Parent has not allocated interest expense to the Group.
The Groups Canadian operations use the services of
Culligan of Canada to provide certain administrative functions,
such as general accounting, credit and collection, billing, and
information technology. These allocated costs are billed to the
Group based upon the level of services provided to the Group.
Expenses allocated by Culligan of Canada to the Group for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $258 and $301,
respectively, and are reflected in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of
operations.
|
|
(c)
|
Services
Provided to the Group
|
The Group uses the services of company owned dealer divisions
(COD) of CIC and Culligan of Canada and other third-party
providers to install and service its vending machines and
equipment at customer locations. The amounts paid to COD for
these services are at the same rate as that paid to third-party
providers. Services provided by COD for installation,
maintenance, and other services for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $1,188 and $1,266,
respectively, and are included in cost of sales in the
accompanying statements of operations.
The Group uses the services of CIC and Culligan of Canada
franchisees to install and service its vending machines and
equipment at customer locations. The amounts paid to franchisees
for these services are at the same rate as that paid to company
owned dealers. Services provided by the franchisees for
installation and maintenance services for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $3,225 and $3,195,
respectively, and are included in cost of sales in the
accompanying statements of operations.
|
|
(d)
|
Purchases
from the Parent
|
The Group purchases equipment and service parts from CIC.
Purchases from CIC for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 were $167 and $413, respectively.
The Group uses the Culligan brand name, which is owned by CIC.
CIC does not charge the Group for the use of the brand name.
Accordingly, there are no expenses related to the use of this
trademark in the accompanying statements of operations.
Substantially all
U.S.-based
employees are eligible to participate in the Culligan Retirement
Savings Plan (the Plan) sponsored by CIC. The Plan is a
qualified defined contribution plan, under Internal Revenue Code
Section 401(k). Contributions to the Plan during the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $9 and $35,
respectively. CIC temporarily suspended matching contributions
in April 2009, due to economic conditions.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Group leases certain facilities and equipment under various
noncancelable long-term and
month-to-month
leases. These leases typically include renewal options and
escalation clauses, and are accounted for as operating leases.
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
aggregated was $151 and $157, respectively.
F-58
CULLIGAN
STORE SOLUTIONS GROUP (A BUSINESS OF CULLIGAN HOLDING
S.ÀR.L)
NOTES TO
COMBINED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands)
Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable leases at
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
2011
|
|
|
109
|
|
2012
|
|
|
111
|
|
2013
|
|
|
113
|
|
2014
|
|
|
96
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Group encounters various claims and litigation actions
arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of
management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the Groups combined
financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
Parent equity at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Contributed capital
|
|
$
|
36,104
|
|
|
|
36,104
|
|
Combined accumulated earnings
|
|
|
16,702
|
|
|
|
12,358
|
|
Cumulative currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,368
|
|
|
|
49,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On June 1, 2010, CSS, CIC and Culligan of Canada entered
into an agreement to sell the assets of the Group to Primo Water
Corporation (Primo). The purchase price is $105 million,
consisting of a cash payment of $60 million and shares of
Primo common stock with a value of $45 million, subject to
certain working capital adjustments. The cash portion of the
purchase price will be increased and the value of the shares of
Primo common stock will be decreased by an amount equal to the
net cash proceeds Primo receives from any exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option in connection with
Primos initial public offering (the IPO). The closing of
the transaction is subject to meeting certain conditions, which
include Primos successful completion of the IPO.
The Group has performed an evaluation of events that have
occurred subsequent to December 31, 2009 and as of
June 4, 2010. There have been no subsequent events that
occurred during such period, other than disclosed in the
paragraph above, that would require disclosure or recognition in
the combined financial statements as of or for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
F-59
6,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
,
2011
Stifel Nicolaus
Weisel
BB&T Capital
Markets
Janney Montgomery
Scott
Signal Hill
Neither we nor any of the underwriters have authorized anyone to
provide information different from that contained in this
prospectus. When you make a decision about whether to invest in
our common stock, you should not rely upon any information other
than the information in this prospectus. Neither the delivery of
this prospectus nor the sale of our common stock means that
information contained in this prospectus is correct after the
date of this prospectus. This prospectus is not an offer to sell
or solicitation of an offer to buy these shares of common stock
in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is
unlawful.
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses Of Issuance And Distribution
|
The following table sets forth all costs and expenses that we
expect to incur in connection with the offer and sale of the
securities being registered. We have agreed, subject to certain
exceptions, to bear substantially all expenses (other than
underwriting discounts, selling commissions, transfer taxes and
fees and expenses of counsel to the selling stockholders) in
connection with the registration and sale of the securities
covered by this registration statement. All amounts shown are
estimates except the SEC registration fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
12,786
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Printing expenses
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
497,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
Of Directors And Officers
|
We are a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was
or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to an action
by reason of the fact that he or she was a director, officer,
employee or agent of the corporation or is or was serving at the
request of the corporation against expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in
connection with such action if he or she acted in good faith and
in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not
opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable
cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful, except that,
in the case of an action by or in right of the corporation, no
indemnification may generally be made in respect of any claim as
to which such person is adjudged to be liable to the
corporation. Our amended and restated bylaws provide that we
will indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and
officers (and may choose to indemnify and advance expenses to
other employees and other agents) to the fullest extent
permitted by law; provided, however, that if we enter into an
indemnification agreement with such directors or officers, such
agreement controls.
Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law
permits a corporation to provide in its certificate of
incorporation that a director of the corporation shall not be
personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duties as a director,
except for liability for any:
|
|
|
|
|
breach of a directors duty of loyalty to the corporation
or its stockholders;
|
|
|
act or omission not in good faith or that involves intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
unlawful payment of dividends or redemption of shares; or
|
|
|
transaction from which the director derives an improper personal
benefit.
|
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that our directors are not personally liable for breaches of
fiduciary duties to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware
General Corporation Law.
These limitations of liability do not apply to liabilities
arising under federal securities laws and do not affect the
availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or
rescission.
Section 145(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law
permits a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on
behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee
or agent of the corporation. Our amended and restated bylaws
permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer,
director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out
of his or her actions in connection with their services to us,
regardless of whether our bylaws permit indemnification. We have
directors and officers liability insurance.
II-1
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, we have
entered into indemnity agreements with each of our directors
that require us to indemnify such persons against various
actions including, but not limited to, third-party actions where
such director, by reason of his or her corporate status, is a
party or is threatened to be made a party to an action, or by
reason of anything done or not done by such director in any such
capacity. We intend to indemnify directors against all costs,
judgments, penalties, fines, liabilities, amounts paid in
settlement by or on behalf such directors and for any expenses
actually and reasonably incurred by such directors in connection
with such action, if such directors acted in good faith and in a
manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the
best interests of the corporation, and with respect to any
criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe their
conduct was unlawful. We also intend to advance to our directors
expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred by such
directors in advance of the final disposition of any action
after the receipt by the corporation of a statement or
statements from directors requesting such payment or payments
from time to time, provided that such statement or statements
are accompanied by an undertaking, by or on behalf of such
directors, to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be
determined that they are not entitled to be indemnified against
such expenses by the corporation.
The indemnification agreements also set forth certain procedures
that will apply in the event of a claim for indemnification or
advancement of expenses, including, among others, provisions
about providing notice to the corporation of any action in
connection with which a director seeks indemnification or
advancement of expenses from the corporation and provisions
concerning the determination of entitlement to indemnification
or advancement of expenses.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
In the three years preceding the filing of this registration
statement, we issued the securities indicated below that were
not registered under the Securities Act. All share and price
information has been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the
reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred
immediately prior to the closing of our initial public offering
on November 10, 2010.
Stock,
Warrants and Convertible Subordinated Notes
1. On May 19, 2011, we granted our four non-employee
directors 3,568 restricted stock units. We received no
consideration from the individuals in connection with the grant
of restricted stock units.
2. On March 29, 2011, we granted to 21 employees
81,000 restricted stock units. We received no consideration from
the individuals in connection with the grant of the restricted
stock units.
3. On October 5, 2010, we issued subordinated
convertible promissory notes, bearing interest at 14% per annum,
in an aggregate principal amount of $3,418,167, and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 24,265 shares of common stock to
22 accredited investors. The aggregate consideration received by
us was $3,418,167.
4. On February 18, 2010, we granted to
18 employees and four non-employee directors
105,654 shares of restricted common stock. We received no
consideration from the individuals in connection with the grant
of the restricted stock.
5. On December 30, 2009, we issued subordinated
convertible promissory notes, bearing interest at 14% per annum,
in an aggregate original principal amount of $15,000,000, and
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 106,482 shares of
common stock to 28 accredited investors. The aggregate
consideration received by us was $15,000,000.
6. On June 4, 2008, we issued a warrant to purchase
9,583 shares of common stock to two residents of Ontario,
Canada. The consideration received by us was $10.
7. Between December 14, 2007 and June 2, 2008, we
issued an aggregate of 12,520,001 shares of Series C
convertible preferred stock and warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 119,980 shares of common stock to
37 accredited investors. The aggregate consideration
received by us was $30,048,002.
8. Between July 11, 2007 and August 9, 2010, we
issued an aggregate of 12,715 shares of our common stock to
seven employees. The aggregate consideration received by us was
$141,587.
We believe that the offer and sale of the securities referenced
in (3), (5) and (7) above were exempt from
registration under the Securities Act by virtue of
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
and/or
Regulation D
II-2
promulgated thereunder as transactions not involving any public
offering. All of the purchasers of unregistered securities for
which we relied on Section 4(2)
and/or
Regulation D represented that they were accredited
investors as defined under the Securities Act. The purchasers in
each case represented that they intended to acquire the
securities for investment only and not with a view to the
distribution thereof and that they either received adequate
information about the registrant or had access, through
employment or other relationships, to such information;
appropriate legends were affixed to the stock certificates
issued in such transactions; and offers and sales of these
securities were made without general solicitation or advertising.
The grants of restricted common stock described in
(4) above were made pursuant to our 2004 Stock Plan to our
officers, directors and employees in reliance upon an available
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act, including those contained in Rule 701 promulgated
under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act. Among other
things, we relied on the fact that, under Rule 701,
companies that are not subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect
to certain offers and sales of securities pursuant to
compensatory benefit plans as defined under that
rule. We believe that our 2004 Stock Plan qualifies as a
compensatory benefit plan.
We believe the sales of common stock referenced in
(6) above were exempt from registration under the
Securities Act by virtue of Regulation S promulgated
thereunder. All of the purchasers of unregistered securities for
which we relied on Regulation S represented that they were
not acquiring the securities for the account or benefit of any
U.S. Person as defined by Regulation S.
The sales of common stock referenced in (8) above was made
pursuant to the exercise of stock options granted under our 2004
Stock Plan to our officers, directors, employees and consultants
and, we believe, were made in reliance upon an available
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act, including those contained in Rule 701 promulgated
under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act. Among other
things, we relied on the fact that, under Rule 701,
companies that are not subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect
to certain offers and sales of securities pursuant to
compensatory benefit plans as defined under that
rule. We believe that our 2004 Stock Plan qualifies as a
compensatory benefit plan.
There were no underwriters engaged in connection with any of the
transactions referenced above.
Stock
Options
1. On May 19, 2011, we granted our four non-employee
directors options to purchase an aggregate of 7,696 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $14.00 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
2. On March 29, 2011, we granted to 21 employees
options to purchase an aggregate of 162,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $12.33 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
3. On February 18, 2010, we granted one of our
employees an option to purchase 9,583 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $12.84 per share. We received no
consideration from this individual in connection with the
issuance of such option.
4. On January 28, 2010, we granted to three of our
employees options to purchase 21,560 shares of our common
stock at an exercise price of $12.84 per share. We received no
consideration from these individuals in connection with the
issuance of such options.
5. On January 29, 2009, we granted to seven of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of 13,605 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $13.04 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
6. On August 1, 2008, we granted to two of our
employees options to purchase an aggregate of 2,874 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $20.66 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
II-3
7. On July 23, 2008, we granted to one employee an
option to purchase 3,833 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $20.66 per share. We received no consideration
from this individual in connection with the issuance of such
options.
8. On June 25, 2008, we granted to one employee an
option to purchase 796 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $20.66 per share. We received no consideration
from this individual in connection with the issuance of such
options.
9. On May 1, 2008, we granted to 18 employees
options to purchase an aggregate of 45,208 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $20.66 per share. We
received no consideration from these individuals in connection
with the issuance of such options.
10. On January 31, 2008, we granted to one employee an
option to purchase 186 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $20.66 per share. We received no consideration
from this individual in connection with the issuance of such
options.
All of the stock options described in items (3) through
(10) above were granted under our 2004 Stock Plan to our
officers, directors, employees and consultants in reliance upon
an available exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act, including those contained in Rule 701
promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act. Among
other things, we relied on the fact that, under Rule 701,
companies that are not subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect
to certain offers and sales of securities pursuant to
compensatory benefit plans as defined under that
rule. We believe that our 2004 Stock Plan qualifies as a
compensatory benefit plan.
Refill
Acquisition
On November 10, 2010, we acquired certain assets of
Culligan Store Solutions, LLC and Culligan of Canada, Ltd. (the
Refill Business) pursuant to an asset purchase
agreement dated June 1, 2010. As a result of the exercise
of the over-allotment option by the underwriters in our initial
public offering, the approximately $105.0 million purchase
price for the Refill Business was comprised of approximately
$74.0 million in cash and 2,587,500 shares of our
common stock (valued at the $12.00 per share initial public
offering price). On November 22, 2010, we issued
2,587,500 shares of our common stock to Culligan
International Company (Culligan International).
The issuance of these shares of our common stock to Culligan
International was made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated thereunder. Culligan International is an
accredited investor as defined in Regulation D.
In addition, the Company received customary private
placement representations in the asset purchase agreement,
including representations to the effect that the shares of our
common stock were acquired for investment and not with a view to
or in connection with an unlawful distribution thereof and that
Culligan International received sufficient information about us
or had access to such information in order to evaluate an
investment in our common stock. No underwriters were involved in
connection with the issuance of these shares and no underwriting
discounts or commissions were payable.
Purchase
of Canada Bulk Water Exchange Business
On March 8, 2011, we issued an additional
307,217 shares of common stock to Culligan International as
payment of a portion of the consideration paid for the
acquisition of certain assets related to Culligan of Canada,
Ltd.s bulk water exchange business pursuant to an asset
purchase agreement dated March 8, 2011.
The issuance of these shares of our common stock to Culligan
International was made in reliance upon the exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated thereunder. Culligan International is an
accredited investor as defined in Regulation D.
In addition, the Company received customary private
placement representations in the asset purchase agreement,
including representations to the effect that the shares of our
common stock were acquired for investment and not with a view to
or in connection with an unlawful distribution thereof and that
Culligan International received sufficient information about us
or had access to such information in order to evaluate an
investment in our common stock. No underwriters were involved in
connection with the issuance of these shares and no underwriting
discounts or commissions were payable.
II-4
Omnifrio
Single-Serve Beverage Business Acquisition
On April 11, 2011, we issued 501,080 shares of our
common stock to Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC
(Omnifrio) in connection with our acquisition of
certain intellectual property and other assets from Omnifrio as
payment of a portion of the consideration paid.
The issuance of these shares of our common stock was made in
reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
Omnifrio is an accredited investor as defined in
Regulation D. In addition, we received customary
private placement representations in the asset
purchase agreement with Omnifrio dated March 8, 2011,
including representations to the effect that these shares were
acquired for investment and not with a view to or in connection
with an unlawful distribution thereof and that Omnifrio received
sufficient information about us or had access to such
information in order to evaluate an investment in our common
stock. No underwriters were involved in connection with the
issuance of these shares and no underwriting discounts or
commissions were payable.
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
See Exhibit Index following the signature page.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions
described in Item 14 above, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(i) For the purpose of determining liability under the
Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, each prospectus filed
pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement
relating to this offering, other than registration statements
relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in
reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and
included in the registration statement as of the date it is
first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no
statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is
part of the registration statement or made in a document
incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the
registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of
contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify
any statement that was made in the registration statement or
prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made
in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
(ii) For the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in
the initial distribution of securities, the undersigned
registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities
of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration
statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell
the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered
or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following
communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to
the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such
securities to such purchaser:
(a) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(b) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
II-5
(c) The portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(d) Any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(iii) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(iv) For the purposes determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered herein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Winston-Salem, State of North
Carolina, on June 9, 2011.
PRIMO WATER CORPORATION
Billy D. Prim
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, in
each case on June 9, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Billy
D. Prim
Billy
D. Prim
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
Castaneda
Mark
Castaneda
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
J. Mills
David
J. Mills
|
|
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
A. Brenner
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Jack
C. Kilgore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Malcolm
McQuilkin
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
David
L. Warnock
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Billy
D. Prim
Billy
D. Prim
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
II-7
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Primo
Water Corporation
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Primo Water Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K filed November 16, 2010)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Certificate representing shares of common stock of
Primo Water Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to Amendment No. 5 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed August
11, 2010)
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of K&L Gates LLP
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Form of 14% Subordinated Convertible Note, dated as of
December 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Form of Subordinated Convertible Debt Common Stock
Purchase Warrant, dated as of December 30, 2009 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Form of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Subscription
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Form of Series C Common Stock Purchase Warrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 1
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Form of First Amendment to Series C Common Stock
Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Form of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Subscription
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Form of Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 1
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
2004 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (2010 Omnibus
Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Option Agreement under 2010 Omnibus Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2010 Omnibus Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Amendment No. 1
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452)
filed April 26, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Companys Form 10-K filed
March 30, 2011)*
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between the
Company and Billy D. Prim (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.22 to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed June
4, 2010)*
|
II-8
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between the
Company and Mark Castaneda (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.23 to Amendment No. to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed June
4, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2010 between the
Company and Michael S. Gunter (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 to Amendment No. 2 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452)
filed June 4, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-165452) filed April 26, 2010)*
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, between the
Company, P1 Sub, LLC, P2 Sub, LLC, Culligan Store Solutions,
LLC, Culligan of Canada, Ltd. and Culligan International Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Amendment No. 2
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed June 4, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2010, between Culligan
Store Solutions, LLC, Culligan International Company, Thomas
Weisel Partners, LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Amendment No. 2
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed June 4, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated October 5, 2010 to Lock-up Agreement dated
as of June 1, 2010 between Culligan Store Solutions, LLC,
Culligan International Company, Thomas Weisel Partners LLC and
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.40 to Amendment No. 7 to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452)
filed October 6, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Form of 14% Convertible Subordinated Note, dated as of
October 5, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to
Amendment No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Form of Consent of the Holders of the Subordinated Convertible
Promissory Notes Issued in December 2009 and October 2010
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to Amendment No. 7
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Series B Common Stock Purchase
Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to Amendment
No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Series C Common Stock Purchase
Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Amendment
No. 7 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-165452) filed October 6, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated November 10, 2010 between
the Company and Culligan International Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
November 16, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Credit Agreement dated November 10, 2010 among the Company,
certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent for
the lenders thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed November 16, 2010)
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 8, 2011 by and among the
Company, Primo Refill Canada Corporation, Culligan of Canada,
Ltd. and Culligan International Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
March 9, 2011)
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement Amendment dated March 8, 2011
between the Company and Culligan International Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011)
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 8, 2011 by and among the
Company, Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC and the other parties
thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Companys Form 8-K filed March 9, 2011)
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2010 Omnibus
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the
Companys Form 10-K filed March 30, 2011)*
|
II-9
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated April 11, 2011 between the
Company and Omnifrio Beverage Company, LLC (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
April 12, 2011)
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
First Amendment and Consent to Credit Agreement dated April 11,
2011 among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company
party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
administrative agent for the lenders thereunder (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
April 12, 2011)
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Form of Lock-up Agreement
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Second Amendment to the Registration Rights Agreement dated
May 12, 2011 between the Company and Culligan International
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys
Form 10-Q
filed May 13, 2011)
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Lock-up Agreement dated May 12, 2011 by Culligan
International Company
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Disgorgement Agreement dated May 12, 2011 between the
Company and Culligan International Company
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Primo Water Corporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Companys Form 10-K filed
March 30, 2011)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen LLP (filed herewith)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP (filed herewith)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of K&L Gates LLP (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously filed.
|
|
*
|
|
Indicates management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
II-10