e10vqza
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended August 27, 2010
Commission File Number 1-10655
ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORPORATION
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-1714256 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
County Line Industrial Park
Southampton, Pennsylvania 18966
(Address
of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (215) 355-9100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted,
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined on Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of September 30, 2010, there were 9,092,197 shares of the registrants common stock issued
and outstanding.
Index
When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, except where the context otherwise
requires, the terms we, us, our, ETC and the Company refer to Environmental Tectonics
Corporation and its subsidiaries.
2
Explanatory Note
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (the Amendment) amends our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended August 27, 2010 as originally filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 6, 2010 (the Original Filing). This Amendment is being filed in response to
comments provided in a series of letters by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) in connection with the Staffs review of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended February 26, 2010, originally filed on May 27, 2010 (the Comment Letters).
This Amendment incorporates the changes that were included in the Companys responses to the
Comment Letters. All other information in the Quarterly Report not specifically changed in this
Form 10-Q/A remains unchanged from the Original Filing.
The most significant changes in the Amendment are as follows:
|
1. |
|
The inclusion in Item 4, Controls and Procedures, of a complete and
properly worded disclosure pursuant to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K of
the SEC; and |
|
|
2. |
|
A restatement of the Companys earnings per share on the consolidated
statement of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended August
27, 2010 and August 28, 2009 to correct an error in the method of calculating the
participating feature of the Companys preferred stock in the basic earning per
share calculation. Please refer to Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
November 30, 2010, for a further explanation of this restatement. |
Except as noted herein, this Amendment does not reflect events that have occurred subsequent
to the filing of the Original Filing.
This Amendment should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the Securities and
Exchange Commission subsequent to the date of the Original Filing. These subsequent filings are as
follows:
|
1. |
|
Form 10-K/A for the period ended February 26, 2010 originally filed on
May 27, 2010 and amended on March 15, 2011; |
|
|
2. |
|
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 28, 2010 originally filed on July
12, 2010 and amended on March 15, 2011; and |
|
|
3. |
|
Form 10-Q for the period ended November 26, 2010, filed January 10,
2011. |
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Income Statements
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week |
|
|
Twenty-six week |
|
|
|
Periods ended |
|
|
Periods ended |
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
13,244 |
|
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
|
$ |
25,365 |
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
8,450 |
|
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
15,441 |
|
|
|
10,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
4,794 |
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
9,924 |
|
|
|
9,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
3,065 |
|
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Environmental
Tectonics Corporation |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
Preferred stock dividend |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
9,090,000 |
|
|
|
9,069,000 |
|
|
|
9,088,000 |
|
|
|
9,063,000 |
|
Participating Preferred shares |
|
|
11,475,000 |
|
|
|
8,351,000 |
|
|
|
11,555,000 |
|
|
|
5,259,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
|
20,565,000 |
|
|
|
17,420,000 |
|
|
|
20,643,000 |
|
|
|
14,322,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common shares |
|
|
20,565,000 |
|
|
|
17,420,000 |
|
|
|
20,643,000 |
|
|
|
14,322,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock warrants and options |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
361,000 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares |
|
|
20,925,000 |
|
|
|
17,454,000 |
|
|
|
21,004,000 |
|
|
|
14,506,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
February 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
5,477 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
2,918 |
|
|
|
17,356 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
8,108 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
5,114 |
|
Deferred tax assets, current |
|
|
5,699 |
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
29,315 |
|
|
|
36,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net |
|
|
13,698 |
|
|
|
13,643 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Software development costs, net |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
44,400 |
|
|
$ |
51,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
Accounts payable trade |
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
6,091 |
|
|
|
13,944 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
Accrued interest and dividends |
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
13,324 |
|
|
|
21,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, less current portion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility payable to bank |
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
9,808 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
9,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned interest |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
25,590 |
|
|
|
34,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative convertible participating preferred stock, Series D, $.05 par
value, 11,000 shares authorized; 155 shares outstanding |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Cumulative convertible participating preferred stock, Series E, $.05 par
value, 25,000 shares authorized; 22,241 and 23,741 shares outstanding at
August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010 |
|
|
22,241 |
|
|
|
23,741 |
|
Common stock, $.05 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,090,635 and
9,083,573 shares issued and outstanding at August 27, 2010 and February
26, 2010 |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
12,974 |
|
|
|
14,050 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(16,991 |
) |
|
|
(20,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
18,767 |
|
|
|
17,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
18,810 |
|
|
|
17,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
44,400 |
|
|
$ |
51,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-six week periods ended |
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,607 |
|
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
Decrease in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accretion of debt discount |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Increase in allowances for accounts receivable and inventories, net |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
14,434 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
(4,532 |
) |
|
|
(2,072 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
247 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
(7,853 |
) |
|
|
(2,359 |
) |
Customer deposits |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
Accrued interest and dividends |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of equipment |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(698 |
) |
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayment) borrowings under line of credit |
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
|
|
700 |
|
Repurchase of preferred stock |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Payment of preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments of other debt obligations |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash for performance guarantee |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(6,681 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
|
|
446 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
854 |
|
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information on non-cash operating and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on preferred stock |
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
695 |
|
On July 2, 2009, the Company exchanged certain existing related-party financial instruments
for a newly-created class of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock. The value of this exchange was
$23,741. Additionally, the Company issued $155 of Series D Preferred Stock as loan origination fees
in connection with the $7,500 Lenfest Credit Facility. See Note 6 Long-Term Obligations and
Credit Arrangements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Restatement of Previously Filed Financial Statements:
On November 29, 2010, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of ETC concluded, based on
the recommendation of management reached November 23, 2010, that the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended February 26, 2010 contained in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 26, 2010, and the consolidated interim
financial statements for the periods ended August 28, 2009, November 27, 2009, May 28, 2010 and
August 27, 2010 contained in the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for these periods, each
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (collectively, the Reports), should be
restated to correct errors relating to the calculation and presentation of the Companys earnings
per share in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, and as a
result, could not be relied upon. Specifically, the Company incorrectly did not reflect the
participating features of its Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock when
calculating and presenting its earnings per share in the financial statements contained in the
Reports.
As a result of an error in the calculation of its earnings per share, the Company has restated
in this Form 10-Q/A its earnings per share calculation for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods
ended August 27, 2010 and August 28, 2009. See Note 3 Earnings Per Share.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business
ETC was incorporated in 1969 in Pennsylvania. For over forty years, we have provided our
customers with products, service and support. Innovation, continuous technological improvement and
enhancement, and product quality are core values and critical to our success. The Company is a
significant supplier and innovator in the following product areas: (1) software driven products and
services used to create and monitor the physiological effects of flight; (2) high performance jet
tactical flight simulation; (3) steam and gas sterilization; (4) testing and simulation devices for
the automotive industry; (5) hyperbaric and hypobaric chambers; and (6) driving and disaster
simulation systems.
The Company operates in two business segments Training Services Group (TSG) and Control
Systems Group (CSG). Our core technologies in TSG include the design, manufacture and sale of
training services which includes (1) software driven products and services used to create and
monitor the physiological effects of flight; (2) high performance jet tactical flight simulation;
and (3) driving and disaster simulation systems, and in CSG include: (1) steam and gas
sterilization; (2) testing and simulation devices for the automotive industry; and (3) hyperbaric
and hypobaric chambers. Product categories included in TSG are Authentic Tactical Fighting Systems
(ATFS), Aircrew Training Systems (ATS) and disaster management systems. CSG includes sterilizers,
environmental control devices and hyperbaric chambers along with parts and service support.
The Companys fiscal year is the 52 or 53-week annual accounting period ending the last Friday
in February. Certain amounts from prior consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the presentation in fiscal 2011.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
ETC, ETCs wholly-owned subsidiaries (Entertainment Technology Corporation, ETC International
Corporation and ETC-Delaware), ETCs 99%-owned subsidiary located in London, England (ETC
Europe), and ETCs 95%-owned subsidiary located in Warsaw, Poland (ETC-PZL Aerospace Industries,
Ltd. (ETC-PZL)). ETC Southampton refers to the Companys corporate headquarters and main
production plant located in Southampton, Pennsylvania. All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by ETC,
without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature.
Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America has
been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial results for the
periods presented may not be indicative of the full years results. Despite these condensations or
omissions, the Company believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended February 26, 2010.
References to fiscal second quarter 2011 are references to the thirteen week period ended
August 27, 2010. References to fiscal second quarter 2010 are references to the thirteen week
period ended August 28, 2009. References to the first half of fiscal 2011 are references to the
twenty-six week period ended August 27, 2010. References to the first half of fiscal 2010 are
references to the twenty-six week period ended August 28, 2009.
7
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes in the Companys significant accounting policies during
fiscal 2011 as compared to what was previously disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 26, 2010.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements
(ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 amends existing revenue recognition accounting pronouncements that are
currently within the scope of Codification Subtopic 605-25 (previously included within EITF 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 00-21). The consensus to ASU 2009-13
provides accounting principles and application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how
the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. This guidance eliminates the
requirement to establish the fair value of undelivered products and services and instead provides
for separate revenue recognition based upon managements estimate of the selling price for an
undelivered item when there is no other means to determine the fair value of that undelivered item.
EITF 00-21 previously required that the fair value of the undelivered item be the price of the item
either sold in a separate transaction between unrelated third parties or the price charged for each
item when the item is sold separately by the vendor. Under EITF 00-21, if the fair value of all of
the elements in the arrangement was not determinable, then revenue was deferred until all of the
items were delivered or fair value was determined. This new approach is effective prospectively for
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010 and allows for retroactive application. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact of this standard on its financial position and results of operations.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition (ASU
2010-17). ASU 2010-17 updates guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether
the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate with the scope of Codification Subtopic
605 (previously included within EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF
00-21). The consensus to ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining
when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition in which
arrangements include payment provisions whereby a portion or all of the consideration is contingent
upon milestone events such as successful completion of phases or a specific result. This new
approach is effective prospectively for milestones achieved in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010 and allows for retroactive application. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact of this standard on its financial position and results of operations as there are
not currently any milestones that will be achieved.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASC 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which requires additional
disclosures on transfers in and out of Level I and Level II and on activity for Level III fair
value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications on existing disclosures are effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
disclosures on Level III activity, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the
adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
8
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
3. Earnings Per Common Share:
The Company has restated its earnings per common share for the thirteen and twenty-six week
periods ended August 27, 2010 and August 28, 2009 to apply the two-class method for computing and
presenting earnings per share.
The Company currently has one class of common stock (the Common Stock) and two classes of
cumulative participating preferred stock, Series D and Series E (the Preferred Stock). Under its
terms, the Preferred Stock is entitled to participate in any cash dividends on a one-for-one basis
for the equivalent converted common shares as if the Preferred Stock were converted by the holder
by the dividend record date. Therefore, the Preferred Stock is considered a participating security
requiring the two-class method for the computation and presentation of net income per share
basic. In the prior issuance of earnings, the Company erroneously applied the if-converted method.
The two-class computation method for each period segregates basic earnings per share into two
categories: distributed earnings per share (i.e., the Preferred Stock stated dividend) and
undistributed earnings per share, which allocates earnings after subtracting the Preferred Stock
dividend to the total of weighted average common shares outstanding plus equivalent converted
common shares related to the Preferred Stock. Basic earning per common share excludes the effect of
common stock equivalents, and is computed using the two-class computation method.
Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could result if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
Diluted earnings per share continues to be computed using the if-converted method. Diluted earnings
per common share assumes the exercise of stock warrants and stock options using the treasury stock
method. If the effect of the conversion of any financial instruments would be anti-dilutive, it is
excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation.
At August 27, 2010, there was $22,396,000 of cumulative convertible participating preferred
stock. These instruments were convertible at exercise prices of:
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock of $55,000 at $0.94 per share, equating to 58,511 shares of
common stock, issued in April 2009; |
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock of $100,000 at $1.11 per share, equating to 90,090 shares
of common stock, issued in July 2009; |
|
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock of $22,241,000 at $2.00 per share, equating to 11,120,500
shares of common stock, issued in July 2009. |
At August 28, 2009, there was $23,896,000 of cumulative convertible participating preferred
stock. These instruments were convertible at exercise prices of:
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock of $55,000 at $0.94 per share, equating to 58,511 shares of
common stock, issued in April 2009; |
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock of $100,000 at $1.11 per share, equating to 90,090 shares
of common stock, issued in July 2009; |
|
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock of $23,741,000 at $2.00 per share, equating to 11,870,500
shares of common stock, issued in July 2009. |
The weighted average number of common shares related to the participating preferred stock for
the twenty-six weeks ended August 28, 2009 includes the effect of the Series B and Series C
Participating Preferred Stock, which were exchanged and cancelled in the July 2009 Lenfest
Financing Transaction (the Lenfest Financing Transaction is discussed in Note 6). These shares
were:
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock of $3,000,000 at $4.95 per share, equating to 606,061
shares of common stock, issued in April 2006; |
|
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock of $3,000,000 at $6.68 per share, equating to 499,102
shares of common stock, issued in July 2006; |
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock of $3,300,000 at $3.03 per share, equating to 1,089,108
shares of common stock, issued in August 2007. |
On February 20, 2009, in connection with the issuance of a $2,000,000 promissory note, the
Company issued warrants to purchase 143,885 shares of the Companys common stock at $1.39 per
share. Additionally, on July 2, 2009, in consideration of an increase of the guarantee on the PNC
line of credit, the Company issued warrants to purchase 450,450 shares of the Companys common
stock at $1.11 per share. (See Note 6, Long-Term Obligations and Credit Arrangements and Note
11-Subsequent Events.)
9
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
On August 27, 2010 and August 28, 2009, respectively, there were options to purchase the
Companys common stock totaling 156,185 and 157,652 shares at an average price of $6.06 and $5.90
per share. Given the conversion price of these common stock options, these shares were excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per share since the effect of their conversion would be
antidulutive.
The effect of the restated earnings per share for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods
ended August 27, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week |
|
|
Twenty-six week |
|
|
|
periods ended |
|
|
periods ended |
|
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(as originally |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
(as originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported) |
|
|
|
|
|
reported) |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands except share and per share information) |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Environmental Tectonics Corporation |
|
$ |
1,666 |
|
|
$ |
1,666 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
Less preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common weighted average number of shares |
|
|
9,090,000 |
|
|
|
9,090,000 |
|
|
|
9,088,000 |
|
|
|
9,088,000 |
|
Participating preferred weighted average number of common
shares |
|
|
11,475,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,555,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average number of shares |
|
|
20,565,000 |
|
|
|
9,090,000 |
|
|
|
20,643,000 |
|
|
|
9,088,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average number of shares |
|
|
20,565,000 |
|
|
|
9,090,000 |
|
|
|
20,643,000 |
|
|
|
9,088,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,269,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,269,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and stock warrants |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
361,000 |
|
|
|
361,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
20,925,000 |
|
|
|
20,719,000 |
|
|
|
21,004,000 |
|
|
|
20,718,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
The effect of the restated earnings per share for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods
ended August 28, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week |
|
|
Twenty-six week |
|
|
|
periods ended |
|
|
periods ended |
|
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 (as |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 (as |
|
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
originally reported) |
|
|
(restated) |
|
|
originally reported) |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
(amounts in thousands except share and per share information) |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Environmental Tectonics Corporation |
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
Less preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common weighted average number of shares |
|
|
9,069,000 |
|
|
|
9,069,000 |
|
|
|
9,063,000 |
|
|
|
9,063,000 |
|
Participating preferred weighted average number of common
shares |
|
|
8,351,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,259,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average number of shares |
|
|
17,420,000 |
|
|
|
9,069,000 |
|
|
|
14,322,000 |
|
|
|
9,063,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average number of shares |
|
|
17,420,000 |
|
|
|
9,069,000 |
|
|
|
14,322,000 |
|
|
|
9,063,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,019,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,019,000 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and stock warrants |
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
17,454,000 |
|
|
|
21,122,000 |
|
|
|
14,506,000 |
|
|
|
21,266,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
4. Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the first in, first out (FIFO)
method and consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
February 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Work in process |
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
4,764 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,667 |
|
|
$ |
5,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory is presented net of an allowance for obsolescence of $2,445,000 (Raw material
$121,000, Work in process $1,623,000 and Finished goods $701,000) and $2,345,000 (Raw material
$138,000, Work in process $1,506,000 and Finished goods $701,000) at August 27, 2010 and February
26, 2010, respectively.
In accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, the Company may
capitalize into property, plant and equipment certain of the costs of simulation equipment. This
equipment may be used to provide training or as a demonstration device to market the technology,
and may be sold as a product if appropriate. Upon receipt of a contract or contracts for products
which are based on this technology, certain of these costs will be transferred initially into
inventory and subsequently charged to the cost of sales for that particular contract as
manufacturing costs.
5. Accounts Receivable:
The components of accounts receivable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
February 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. government |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
U.S. commercial |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
International |
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
15,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
17,771 |
|
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,918 |
|
|
$ |
17,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
6. Long-Term Obligations and Credit Arrangements:
Bank Credit and Facility
Increased PNC Bank Credit Facility and Issuance of New Guarantee
On April 24, 2009, PNC Bank agreed to increase the amount of financing available under the
2007 PNC Credit Facility from $15,000,000 to $20,000,000, subject to the condition that H.F.
Lenfest (Lenfest), a major shareholder and member of our Board of Directors, continue to
personally guarantee all of ETCs obligations to PNC Bank (the Lenfest Guaranty) and that Lenfest
pledge $10,000,000 in marketable securities as collateral security for his guarantee (the Lenfest
Pledge).
Following the receipt of shareholder approval for the Lenfest Financing Transaction, ETC and
PNC Bank entered into the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Amended and Restated PNC
Credit Agreement) and the Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement for Letters of
Credit (the Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement). The 2007 promissory note was
cancelled and replaced with an amended and restated promissory note in the principal amount of
$20,000,000 (the Amended and Restated PNC Note).
In connection with the execution of the amended and restated agreements and note with PNC, ETC
paid to Lenfest an origination fee of 100 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock of the
Company (the Series D Preferred Stock), which is equal to 1% of the market value of the
$10,000,000 in marketable securities pledged by Lenfest to PNC Bank to secure ETCs obligations to
PNC Bank. The 100 shares of Series D Preferred Stock have a stated value of $1,000 per share, or
$100,000 in the aggregate. These shares of Series D Preferred Stock have a conversion price per
share equal to $0.94, which price equaled the average closing price of ETC common stock during the
120 days prior to the issuance of such shares. Additionally, ETC will pay Lenfest annual interest
equal to 2% of the amount of the Lenfest Pledge, payable in Series D Preferred Stock. On October 6,
2010, the Company issued to Lenfest 231 shares of Series D Preferred Stock with a stated value of
$1,000 in payment of $231,000 of interest due under Lenfest Pledge agreement for the period July 2,
2009 through August 27, 2010. The 231 shares of have a conversion price per shared equal to $3.02,
which price equaled the average closing price of ETC common stock during the 120 days prior to the
issuance of such shares, and would convert into 76,490 shares of ETC common stock.
In consideration of Lenfest entering into the amended and restated guaranty, ETC issued to
Lenfest warrants equal in value to 10% of the amount of the $5,000,000 increase under the 2007 PNC
Bank Credit Facility. The warrants are exercisable for seven years following issuance to purchase
450,450 shares of ETC Common Stock at an exercise price per share equal to $1.11, which price
equaled the average closing price of ETC common stock during the 120 days prior to the issuance of
the warrant. The Company recorded a loan origination deferred charge associated with these warrants
of $487,000 using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions: expected volatility of 91.9%; risk-free interest rate of 0.49%; and an expected life
of seven years.
Originally, amounts borrowed under the Amended and Restated PNC Credit Agreement could be
borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time until June 30, 2010. Borrowings made pursuant to
the Amended and Restated PNC Credit Agreement bear interest at either the prime rate (as described
in the promissory note executed pursuant to the Amended and Restated PNC Credit Agreement) plus
0.50 percentage points or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (as described in the
Promissory Note) plus 2.50 percentage points. Additionally, ETC is obligated to pay a fee of 0.125%
per year for unused but available funds under the line of credit.
Amendments to the Credit Agreement
On October 1, 2009, the Amended and Restated PNC Credit Agreement was amended to extend the
maturity date to June 30, 2011. Additionally, the affirmative covenants were adjusted. The
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth covenant was modified to reflect the impact on the Companys
balance sheet of the Lenfest Financing Transaction. Effective with each fiscal quarter ending after
October 1, 2009, the Company must maintain a minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of at least
$10,000,000. The EBITDA covenant was changed for fiscal periods beginning after December 1, 2009.
Beginning with the first fiscal quarter ending after December 1, 2009, and for each fiscal quarter
ending thereafter, the Company must maintain a minimum cumulative aggregate EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of $4,000,000 for the fiscal quarter then ending
and the three preceding fiscal quarters. The Company is in compliance with its covenants as of
August 27, 2010.
On August 18, 2010, the 2007 PNC Credit Facility was amended a second time to extend the
maturity date from June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2013.
13
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
As of August 27, 2010, the Companys availability under the Amended and Restated PNC Credit
Agreement was approximately $9,964,000. This reflected cash borrowings of $8,477,000 and
outstanding letters of credit of approximately $1,559,000.
Due to the Companys accumulated deficit, all dividends accruing for the outstanding Series D
and E Preferred Stock have been recorded in the accompanying financial statements as a reduction in
additional paid-in capital.
Dedicated Line of Credit Agreement with PNC Bank
On November 16, 2009, the Company and PNC Bank entered into a Letter Agreement, Reimbursement
Agreement, Pledge Agreement, and Amendment to Subordination Agreement (collectively, the Dedicated
Line of Credit Agreement), pursuant to which the Company received a committed line of credit in
the amount of $5,422,405 (the Line of Credit) which the Company used to satisfy performance bond
and repayment guarantee requirements in a newly awarded contract. Use of this dedicated line of
credit is restricted to funding contract performance and repayment guarantee requirements under
this specific contract.
Initially, as security for the Line of Credit, ETC and Lenfest were each required to provide
PNC Bank with the equivalent of $2,711,000 in the form of cash or other financial instruments. To
meet this requirement, ETC deposited cash in this amount in a restricted bank account with PNC
Bank. Lenfest had guaranteed the Companys obligations under the Dedicated Line of Credit
Agreement, and had pledged to PNC Bank $2,711,000 in certificated securities. Under the terms of
the line, ETC was required, by August 19, 2010, to place additional cash funds of $2,711,000 with
PNC Bank, at which time the Lenfest guarantee would be terminated and the Lenfest securities would
be returned to Lenfest.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company fulfilled its requirement to fund the
balance of the security to collateralize the committed line of credit by depositing approximately
$2,711,000 in a certificate of deposit with PNC. This amount is included in Restricted Cash in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. As a result, Lenfests securities were returned and his
guarantee to cover the $5.4 million line was terminated.
Lenfest Credit Facility
As part of the Lenfest Financing Transaction, the Company established a credit facility in the
maximum amount of $7,500,000 with Lenfest (the Lenfest Credit Facility) to be used to finance
certain government projects that ETC has been awarded. The terms of the Lenfest Credit Facility
are set forth in a Secured Credit Facility and Warrant Purchase Agreement between the Company and
Lenfest, dated as of April 24, 2009 (the Lenfest Credit Agreement). In connection with the
Lenfest Credit Agreement, the Company has executed, and will in the future execute, promissory
notes in favor of Lenfest, in the aggregate principal amount of up to $7,500,000 (the Lenfest
Credit Facility Note) based on the amount borrowed by the Company pursuant to the Lenfest Credit
Agreement. Each Lenfest Credit Facility Note issued under the Lenfest Credit Facility will accrue
interest at the rate of 10% per annum, payable in cash or, at the option of Lenfest, in shares of
Series D Preferred Stock of the Company, as described below. The Lenfest Credit Facility expires
on December 31, 2012. As of August 27, 2010, the Company had not utilized any of the $7.5 million
available funding under this facility.
ETC-PZL Project Financing
In September 2009, ETC-PZL, located in Warsaw, Poland, entered into a project financing
agreement with a Warsaw bank to fund a research and development contract with the Polish
government. The amount of this facility is $604,000 and it is being repaid in quarterly
installments of approximately $70,000 which commenced in September 2009. This facility will expire
in September 2011. Use of this line of credit is restricted to funding contract requirements under
a specific research and development contract with the Polish government.
Lenfest Financing Transaction
On April 24, 2009, the Company entered into a transaction (the Lenfest Financing
Transaction), which was approved by shareholders on July 2, 2009, with Lenfest that provided for
the following: (i) a $7,500,000 credit facility provided by Lenfest to ETC, which expires on
December 31, 2012; (ii) exchange of a $10 million Subordinated Note held by Lenfest, together with
all accrued interest and warrants issuable under the Subordinated Note, and all Series B Preferred
Stock and Series C Preferred Stock held by Lenfest, together with all accrued dividends thereon,
for a new class of preferred stock, Series E Preferred Stock, of the Company; and (iii) the
guarantee by Lenfest of all of ETCs obligations to PNC Bank, National Association (PNC Bank) in
connection with an increase of the Companys existing $15,000,000 revolving line of credit with PNC
Bank (the 2007 PNC Credit Facility) to $20,000,000, and in connection with this guarantee, the
pledge by Lenfest to PNC Bank of $10,000,000 in marketable securities.
14
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
Preferred Stock
The Company has two classes of Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock: Series D
(11,000 shares authorized) and Series E (25,000 shares authorized) (together, the Preferred
Stock). The Preferred Stock was authorized by the Companys Board of Directors in April 2009 and
approved by the Companys shareholders in July 2009. The Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.05
per share and a stated value of $1,000.00 per share. The Preferred Stock is entitled to receive
cumulative dividends at the rate of 10% per year in preference to the holders of the Companys
common stock with respect to dividends. These dividends are payable only upon a liquidation event
or when otherwise declared by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company cannot declare or
pay any dividends on its common stock until the dividends on the Preferred Stock have been paid.
The Preferred Stock holders are entitled to receive any dividends paid with respect to the common
stock on an as-converted basis. The Preferred Stock may be converted by the holder at any time
and from time to time into the Companys common stock by dividing the stated value of the Preferred
Stock by the conversion price established at the time of issuance (see Series D and Series E
below). Upon a liquidation event, the holders of the Preferred Stock would be entitled to
participate in any proceeds in preference to any common stock holders. The Preferred Stock would
also participate in any liquidation event with the common stock holders on an as-converted basis.
The Preferred Stock conversion price is subject to adjustment for certain transactions including
stock splits and issuance of equity securities below the conversion prices.
The Company has reviewed the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to the
Preferred Stock and has determined that the Preferred Stock qualifies as permanent equity.
Specifically, the Company reviewed ASC 815 and determined that the attributes of the preferred
stock were more akin to equity than debt. The attributes considered by the Company included the
designation of the instruments, the conversion of the instruments to the Companys common stock,
participation feature, no mandatory conversion, voting rights and ability to appoint directors. The
Company also reviewed ASC 480 and concluded that the preferred stock were within the control of the
Company. In addition, the Company has concluded that the conversion feature qualifies for the
scope exception of ASC 815 as it is clearly and closely related to the Preferred Stock instrument.
Additionally, the Company reviewed ASC 480 Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity and
determined that these instruments are permanent equity because the preferred instruments are not
mandatorily redeemable, there is no obligation to repurchase the instruments and there is no
obligation to issue a variable amount of common shares.
Issuances of the Preferred Stock are as follows:
Series D Preferred Stock
On April 24, 2009, the Company paid to Lenfest an origination fee of 1%
of the committed amount of the Lenfest Credit Facility. The value of the
origination fee was $55,000. The origination fee was paid in 55 shares of
Series D Preferred Stock having a conversion price of $0.94 per share, which
price equaled the average closing price of ETCs common stock during the 120
days prior to the issuance of such shares and would convert into 58,511
shares of ETCs common stock.
In connection with the execution of the 2009 PNC Financing Documents,
ETC paid to Lenfest an origination fee of 100 shares of Series D Preferred
Stock, which is equal to one percent (1%) of the market value of the
$10,000,000 in marketable securities pledged by Lenfest to PNC Bank to secure
ETCs obligations to PNC Bank. The 100 shares of Series D Preferred Stock
have a stated value of $1,000 per share, or $100,000 in the aggregate. These
shares of Series D Preferred Stock have a conversion price per share equal to
$1.11, which price equaled the average closing price of ETCs common stock
during the 120 days prior to the issuance of such shares and would convert
into 90,090 shares of ETCs common stock.
As of August 27, 2010, the Series D Preferred Stock totaled $155,000 and
was convertible into 148,601 shares of the Companys common stock. The
Company has paid all Series D Preferred Stock dividends accruing through
August 27, 2010.
15
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
Series E Preferred Stock
In July 2009, the Company issued 23,741 shares of Series E Preferred
Stock to Lenfest in connection with the Series E Exchange transaction. The
shares of Series E Preferred Stock are convertible to common stock at a
conversion price per share equal to $2.00 and would convert into 11,870,500
shares of ETC common stock.
During the first six months of fiscal 2011, the Company repurchased and retired $1,500,000
(1,500 shares) of Series E Preferred Stock from Lenfest.
As of August 27, 2010, the Series E Preferred Stock totaled $22,241,000 and was convertible
into 11,120,500 shares of the Companys common stock. The Company has paid all Series E Preferred
Stock dividends accruing through August 27, 2010.
Common Stock Warrants
In February 2009, in connection with a $2 million loan made by Lenfest to the Company, the
Company issued to Lenfest warrants to purchase 143,885 shares of ETC common stock, which shares
were in equal in value to 10% of the $2 million note. The warrants are exercisable for seven years
following issuance at an exercise price of $1.39, which price equaled the average closing price of
ETC common stock during the 120 days prior to the issuance of the warrant.
In July 2009, in consideration of Lenfest entering into the Amended and Restated Guaranty, ETC
issued to Lenfest warrants to purchase 450,450 shares of ETC common stock, which shares were equal
in value to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the $5,000,000 increase under the 2007 PNC Bank
Credit Facility. The warrants are exercisable for seven years following issuance at an exercise
price per share equal to $1.11, which price equaled the average closing price of ETC common stock
during the 120 days prior to the issuance of the warrant.
During the exercise period of the warrant agreements, the exercise price and number of
warrant shares shall be subject to adjustment. In the event of an issuance of ETCs common
stock, convertible securities, options or warrants without consideration or for a
consideration less than the exercise price of the warrants, the exercise price shall be
reduced and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrant shall be
adjusted. (See Note 11-Subsequent Events.)
Long-term obligations at August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
February 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Note payable to bank |
|
$ |
8,477 |
|
|
$ |
9,600 |
|
ETC-PZL project financing |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Automobile loan |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt obligations |
|
|
8,775 |
|
|
|
10,093 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current maturities |
|
$ |
8,653 |
|
|
$ |
9,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value
because of the short maturity associated with these instruments. Derivative financial instruments
are recorded at fair value.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The hierarchy below lists three
levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are
observable in the market. The Company categorizes each of its fair value measurements in one of
these three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement in its entirety. The Company adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The Company did not elect the fair
value option. The levels of input are:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
of liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets and quoted prices or identical assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active; |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, which
require the reporting entitys judgment or estimation. |
The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment and may affect the valuation of financial assets and financial liabilities and their
placement within the fair value hierarchy.
The Companys financial liabilities are accounted for at cost. The fair value of these instruments,
calculated on a recurring basis using the discounted cash flow methodology, is summarized below
(amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010 using: |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Credit facility payable to bank |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,023 |
|
|
$ |
9,023 |
|
ETC-PZL contract financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,293 |
|
|
$ |
9,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at |
|
|
|
February 26, 2010 using: |
Liabilities |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Credit facility payable to bank |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,551 |
|
|
$ |
10,551 |
|
ETC-PZL contract financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
11,004 |
|
|
$ |
11,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
8. Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes as well as the valuation of net
loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances are reviewed each fiscal period to determine whether there
is sufficient positive or negative evidence to support a change in judgment about the realizability
of the related deferred tax asset.
The Company has reviewed the components of its deferred tax asset and has determined, based
upon all available information, that its current and expected future operating income will more
likely than not result in the realization of a portion of its deferred tax assets relating
primarily to its net operating loss carryforwards. As of August 27, 2010, the Company had
approximately $34.0 million of federal net loss carry forwards available to offset future income
tax liabilities, beginning to expire in 2025. In addition, the Company has the ability to offset
deferred tax assets against deferred tax liabilities created for such items as depreciation and
amortization.
As a result of the Companys analysis, no provision for income taxes was recorded in the
Condensed Consolidated Income Statements for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended August
27, 2010. For the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended August 28, 2009, the Company did
not record any provision for income taxes due to the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards.
During the fiscal years ended February 26, 2010 and February 27, 2009, the Company did not
have any unrecognized tax benefits and accordingly did not recognize interest expense or penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax
examinations by tax authorities for the fiscal years before 2007.
The Companys majority-owned subsidiary, ETC-PZL, is no longer subject to tax examinations in
Poland for tax periods prior to December 31, 2005.
The tax effects of the primary components of the temporary differences are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
February 26, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss and credits |
|
$ |
14,610 |
|
|
$ |
15,607 |
|
Vacation reserve |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Inventory reserve |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Receivable reserve |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Warranty reserve |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Compensation and other reserves |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,059 |
|
|
|
16,946 |
|
Valuation Reserve |
|
|
(10,360 |
) |
|
|
(11,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred tax asset |
|
|
5,699 |
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of capitalized software |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred tax liability |
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
2,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Mends International, Ltd.
On May 29, 2008, a Request for Arbitration was filed against the Company with the Secretariat
of the International Court of Arbitration by Mends International Ltd. (Mends). Mends Request
for Arbitration arose out of a February 3, 1999 contract between the Company and Mends wherein
Mends purchased aeromedical equipment for sale to the Nigerian Air Force. On July 1, 2010, the
International Court of Arbitration issued a Partial Final Award which was within the scope of the
Companys reserve and which did not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations. Additionally, the International Court of Arbitration may make
an additional award to allocate the costs of the arbitration (including attorneys fees) between
the parties. It is not expected that any additional award, if any, will have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position or results of operation.
Administrative Agreement with U.S. Navy
In 2007, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Department of the Navy to
resolve litigation filed by the Company in May 2003 in connection with a contract for submarine
rescue decompression chambers. As of May 14, 2008, the Company made all payments required under
this settlement agreement and transferred the chambers to the Department of the Navy. From October
2, 2007 through December 12, 2007, the Company was suspended by the Department of the Navy from
soliciting work for the federal government pursuant to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
However, effective December 12, 2007, the Department of the Navy lifted the Companys suspension
pursuant to the execution by the Company and the Department of the Navy of an Administrative
Agreement. In accordance with the Administrative Agreement, the Company has established and
implemented a program of compliance reviews, audits and reports.
19
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
10. Segment Information (unaudited):
The Company operates in two business segments Training Services Group (TSG) and Control
Systems Group (CSG). The Companys core technologies in TSG include the design, manufacture and
sale of training services which includes (1) software driven products and services used to create
and monitor the physiological effects of flight; (2) high performance jet tactical flight
simulation; and (3) driving and disaster simulation systems, and in CSG include: (1) steam and gas
sterilization; (2) testing and simulation devices for the automotive industry; and (3) hyperbaric
and hypobaric chambers. Product categories included in TSG are Authentic Tactical Fighting Systems
(ATFS), Aircrew Training Systems (ATS) and disaster management systems. CSG includes sterilizers,
environmental control devices and hyperbaric chambers along with parts and service support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training Services |
|
|
Control Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group (TSG) |
|
|
Group (CSG) |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Company Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week period ended
August 27, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
8,675 |
|
|
$ |
4,569 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,244 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
1,911 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
21,101 |
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
19,688 |
|
|
|
44,400 |
|
Expenditures for segment assets |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week period ended
August 28, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
6,391 |
|
|
$ |
3,469 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
1,891 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
5,388 |
|
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
25,616 |
|
|
|
36,633 |
|
Expenditures for segment assets |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen weeks |
|
|
Thirteen weeks |
|
|
|
ended August 27, |
|
|
ended August 28, |
|
|
|
2010: |
|
|
2009 |
|
Reconciliation to
consolidated net income
attributable to Environmental
Tectonics Corporation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
|
$ |
1,891 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
Income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Environmental Tectonics
Corporation |
|
$ |
1,666 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
10. Segment Information (unaudited) (contd):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training Services |
|
|
Control Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group (TSG) |
|
|
Group (CSG) |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Company Total |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
Twenty-six week period ended
August 27, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
16,607 |
|
|
$ |
8,758 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,365 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
4,152 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
21,101 |
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
19,688 |
|
|
|
44,400 |
|
Expenditures for segment assets |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-six week period ended
August 28, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
13,306 |
|
|
$ |
6,135 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
3,234 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
5,388 |
|
|
|
5,629 |
|
|
|
25,616 |
|
|
|
36,633 |
|
Expenditures for segment assets |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty-six weeks |
|
|
Twenty-six weeks |
|
|
|
ended August 27, |
|
|
ended August 28, |
|
|
|
2010: |
|
|
2009 |
|
Reconciliation to
consolidated net income
attributable to Environmental
Tectonics Corporation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
4,152 |
|
|
$ |
3,234 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(866 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
Income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Environmental Tectonics
Corporation |
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration of Sales Greater than 10%
Approximately 74% of sales totaling $9,860,000 in the thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2010
were made to the U.S. Government and to one international customer. Approximately 36% of sales
totaling $3,582,000 in the thirteen weeks ended August 28, 2009 were made to two international
customers.
Included in the segment information for the thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2010 are
international sales (which include sales made by the Companys foreign subsidiaries) of $4,239,000,
including sales to the Korean government for $3,373,000. For the thirteen week period ended August
28, 2009, there were international sales of $5,307,000, including sales to or relating to
government or commercial accounts in Saudi Arabia of $3,582,000.
Approximately 72% of sales totaling $18,139,000 in the first half of fiscal 2011 were made to
the U.S. Government and to one international customer. Approximately 45% of sales totaling
$8,693,000 in the first half of fiscal 2010 were made to the U.S. Government and two international
customers.
Included in the segment information for the first half of fiscal 2011 are international sales
(which include sales made by the Companys foreign subsidiaries) of $9,456,000, including sales to
the Korean government for $7,847,000. For the first half of fiscal 2010, there were international
sales of $11,093,000, including sales to or relating to government or commercial accounts in Saudi
Arabia of $6,666,000.
Segment operating income consists of net sales less applicable costs and expenses relating to
these revenues. Unallocated general corporate expenses and other expenses such as letter of credit
fees have been excluded from the determination of the total profit/loss for segments. Corporate
home office expenses are primarily central administrative office expenses. Other expenses include
banking and letter of credit fees. Property, plant and equipment associated with the Companys
NASTAR Center are included in the TSG segment; the remaining property, plant and equipment are not
identified with specific business segments, as these are common resources shared by all segments.
21
Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, continued
11. Subsequent Event
On January 4, 2011, the Company entered into amendments to each of the
warrants issued to Lenfest pursuant to which Lenfest agreed to remove a provision in each of the
warrants which provided anti-dilution protection in the event the Company issued securities at a
price below the exercise price set forth in the warrants.
22
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Discussions of some of the matters contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for
Environmental Tectonics Corporation may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. We have based
these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events or
future financial performance, which include implementing our business strategy, developing and
introducing new technologies, obtaining, maintaining and expanding market acceptance of the
technologies we offer, and competition in our markets. These forward-looking statements are subject
to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about ETC and its subsidiaries that may
cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
these forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Companys vision,
mission, strategies, goals, beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations, anticipations, estimates,
intentions, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and business of the
Company, including, but not limited to, (i) projections of revenues, costs of materials,
income or loss, earnings or loss per share, capital expenditures, growth prospects, dividends,
capital structure, other financial items and the effects of currency fluctuations, (ii) statements
of our plans and objectives of the Company or its management or Board of Directors, including the
introduction of new products, or estimates or predictions of actions of customers, suppliers,
competitors or regulatory authorities, (iii) statements of future economic performance, (iv)
statements of assumptions and other statements about the Company or its business, (v) statements
made about the possible outcomes of litigation involving the Company, (vi) statements regarding the
Companys ability to obtain financing to support its operations and other expenses, and (vii)
statements preceded by, followed by or that include terminology such as may, will, should,
expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, future, predict, potential, intend,
or continue, and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties which are subject to change based on various important factors. Some of these risks
and uncertainties, in whole or in part, are beyond the Companys control. Factors that might cause
or contribute to such a material difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 26, 2010, in the section entitled
Risks Particular to Our Business. Shareholders are urged to review these risks carefully prior
to making an investment in the Companys common stock.
The Company cautions that the foregoing list of factors that could affect forward-looking
statements by ETC is not exclusive. Except as required by federal securities law, the Company does
not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made
from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
In this report all references to ETC, the Company, we, us, or our, mean
Environmental Tectonics Corporation and our subsidiaries.
References to fiscal second quarter 2011 are references to the thirteen week period ended
August 27, 2010. References to fiscal second quarter 2010 are references to the thirteen week
period ended August 28, 2009. References to the first half of fiscal 2011 are references to the
twenty-six week period ended August 27, 2010. References to the first half of fiscal 2010 are
references to the twenty-six week period ended August 28, 2009. References to fiscal 2011 or the
2011 fiscal year are references to the fifty-two week period through February 25, 2011. References
to fiscal 2010 or the 2010 fiscal year are references to the fifty-two week period which ended
February 26, 2010.
Overview
ETC was incorporated in 1969 in Pennsylvania. For over forty years, we have provided our
customers with products, service and support. Innovation, continuous technological improvement and
enhancement, and product quality are core values and critical to our success. We are a significant
supplier and innovator in the following product areas: (1) software driven products and services
used to create and monitor the physiological effects of flight; (2) high performance jet tactical
flight simulation; (3) steam and gas sterilization; (4) testing and simulation devices for the
automotive industry; (5) hyperbaric and hypobaric chambers; and (6) driving and disaster simulation
systems.
We operate in two business segments Training Services Group (TSG) and Control Systems
Group (CSG). Our core technologies in TSG include the design, manufacture and sale of training
services which consists of (1) software driven products and services used to create and monitor the
physiological effects of flight; (2) high performance jet tactical flight simulation; and (3)
driving and disaster simulation systems, and in CSG include: (1) steam and gas sterilization; (2)
testing and simulation devices for the automotive industry; and (3) hyperbaric and hypobaric
chambers. Product categories included in TSG are Aircrew Training Systems (ATS) and flight
simulators and disaster management systems. CSG includes sterilizers, environmental control devices
and hyperbaric chambers along with parts and service support. Revenue and other financial
information regarding our segments may be found in Note 10 Business Segment Information of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
23
The following factors had an impact on our financial performance, cash flow and financial
position for the first half of fiscal 2011 which ended August 27, 2010:
|
|
|
Increased production under U.S. Government contracts |
The Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Act passed in 2005 by Congress mandated base
closures and consolidations through all U.S. defense services. As a result of BRAC, in the past
two years we have been awarded three major contracts for pilot training. Our fiscal 2011 opening
backlog of firm orders included approximately $48 million for two contracts, one from the U.S.
Navy for a research disorientation trainer and one from the U.S. Air Force to provide a high
performance training and research human centrifuge. As a result of engineering and production
activity on these two contracts, sales to the U.S. Government increased by approximately $6.5
million in our Training Services Group during the first half of fiscal 2011 versus the first
half of fiscal 2010. On June 12, 2010, we were awarded an additional $38.3 million contract by
the U. S. Air Force to provide a suite of altitude chambers. Although at the current time we
have a significant sales backlog with the U.S. Government for equipment being procured under the
BRAC Act, it should not be assumed that any additional contracts will be awarded to us at the
same rate in the future.
Historically, certain international customers have considered the sale of a simulation
device to the U.S. Government as an important criterion of their evaluation to purchase ETCs
simulators.
|
|
|
Exchange of long term debt, establishment of additional facility, and increase in bank
line |
Adequate cash availability, both from operations and under our loan agreements, is an
important factor which allows us to efficiently produce and fulfill delivery obligations under
our large multi-year contracts. These contracts require significant cash outlays for materials
during certain phases of production. Additionally, as our backlog and performance have grown,
cash requirements for general operations have expanded.\
On April 24, 2009, we entered into a transaction with H. F. Lenfest (Lenfest), a member
of our Board of Directors and a significant shareholder, that provided for the following: (i) a
$7,500,000 credit facility to be provided by Lenfest to ETC; (ii) exchange of a Subordinated
Note held by Lenfest, together with all accrued interest and warrants issuable under the
Subordinated Note, and all Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock held by
Lenfest, together with all accrued dividends thereon, for a new class of preferred stock, Series
E Preferred Stock, of the Company; and (iii) an increase of the existing $15,000,000 revolving
line of credit with PNC Bank to $20,000,000. During fiscal 2011, the Company has repurchased
$1,500,000 of the Series E Preferred Stock.
|
|
|
Impact of net operating loss carryforwards and tax reserves |
Prior to fiscal 2010, we experienced significant operating losses. Over such periods, we
accumulated a deferred tax asset which can be utilized to offset future income tax liabilities.
In previous years (years prior to fiscal 2010), we established a full valuation reserve on our
deferred tax asset because of the recurring losses sustained by the Company. Subsequently, the
Companys profitability and sales backlog has, after analysis, led to a partial release of the
valuation reserve. The impact on operations and financial performance since fiscal 2009 has been
twofold. First, we have been able to offset income tax expense on income by realizing a portion
of our deferred tax assets via reductions in the reserve. Secondly, we have been able to
conserve cash by not actually paying significant income taxes to the Internal Revenue Service
and state taxing authorities that would be required to be paid absent the deferred tax assets.
During the first half of fiscal 2011, our income tax liability was offset by a
corresponding reduction in our deferred tax asset reserve. Valuation allowances are reviewed
each fiscal period to determine whether there is sufficient positive or negative evidence to
support a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset. As of
August 27, 2010, the Company had approximately $34 million of federal net loss carry forwards
available to offset future income tax liabilities, beginning to expire in 2025.
|
|
|
Continued expanded use of our NASTAR Center |
Our National Aerospace Training and Research (NASTAR) Center, which opened in fiscal 2008,
is an integrated pilot training center offering a complete range of aviation training and
research support for military aviation, civil aviation and the emerging commercial space market.
The NASTAR Center houses state of the art equipment including the ATFS-400, a GYROLAB GL-2000
Advanced Spatial Disorientation Trainer, a Hypobaric Chamber, an Ejection Seat Trainer, and a
Night Vision and Night Vision Goggle Training System. These products represent over forty years
of pioneering development and training solutions for the most rigorous stresses encountered
during high performance aircraft flight including the effects of altitude exposure, High G-force
exposure, spatial disorientation and escape from a disabled aircraft.
During the past two fiscal years we have been successful in utilizing the NASTAR Center for
research, space training and as a showroom to market our Authentic Tactical Fighting System
technology. We feel that demonstrating tactical flight simulation in our NASTAR Center has been
highly instrumental in our obtaining significant orders for our Aircrew Training Systems
products.
24
Going forward, we are hopeful for expanded research in two applications: (a) research
related to the commercialization of suborbital flight, and (b) research aimed at examining the
effectiveness of using centrifuge based simulation for Upset Recovery Training (URT) for
commercial airline pilots.
Suborbital flight: The Federal Aviation Administration currently regulates commercial
flight. However, flights into very high altitudes will require additional and different pilot
training. The physiology of flight into very high altitudes is significantly different than that
experienced during existing commercial flight. Thus, its impact on passengers must be evaluated.
Research is required to develop flight crew standards and to evaluate human factors as ordinary
citizens experience physical stresses.
Upset Recovery Training: Loss of control in flight is a major cause factor in loss of life
and hull damage aircraft accidents. Modern day commercial aviation currently has no requirement
for training of pilots to deal with these situations, commonly referred to as upsets.
Realistic training for responding to and recovering from upsets, or URT, requires more than a
non-centrifuged based simulator because non-centrifuge-based simulators do not reproduce the
physiological stresses and disorientation that a pilot experiences during an actual upset. We
believe our GYROLAB simulator series is an answer to providing pilots with the dynamic
environment necessary for effective training.
|
|
|
Continued capital and consulting spending to enhance and market worldwide our Authentic
Tactical Fighting Systems (ATFS) and other technologies. |
We have directed significant funds and management attention toward the marketing of our
ATFS line of products. This effort includes engineering costs to improve the technical abilities
of the ATFS products. Going forward, we expect to continue significant spending for these
efforts.
As a result of our Lenfest Refinancing Transaction, our average fully diluted shares have
increased by approximately 11.0 million shares. Given our positive financial performance, this
increase in equivalent common shares has a dilutive impact on our earnings per share.
During the first half of fiscal 2011, we repurchased $1,500,000 of Series E Preferred Stock
from Lenfest.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operation are
based upon the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Companys
condensed financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that reflect significant judgments and
uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions
and conditions. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting
policies, see Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
February 26, 2010.
25
Results of Operations
Thirteen week period ended August 27, 2010 compared to the thirteen week period ended August 28,
2009
We have historically experienced significant variability in our quarterly revenue, earnings
and other operating results, and our performance may fluctuate significantly in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Table of Results |
|
|
|
Thirteen week |
|
|
Thirteen week |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
period ended |
|
|
period ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
( ) =Unfavorable |
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
2,877 |
|
|
$ |
(459 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
)% |
US Government |
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
293.0 |
|
International |
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
13,244 |
|
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
4,794 |
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Environmental Tectonics
Corporation |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
% |
Preferred stock dividend |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information (restated): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
The Company had net income attributable to ETC of $1,666,000 or $0.05 per share (diluted)
during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to net income attributable to ETC of $1,249,000
or $0.05 per share (diluted), for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, representing an increase of
$417,000 or 33.4%. The increase reflected a reduction in selling and marketing expenses, interest
expense and a loss on extinguishment of debt of $224,000, which the Company recognized in the prior
year.
26
Sales
The following schedule presents the Companys sales by segment, business unit and geographic
area (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week period ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen week period ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Segment sales: |
|
Domestic |
|
|
USG |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
USG |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Training Services Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilot Training Services |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
4,952 |
|
|
$ |
2,868 |
|
|
$ |
7,879 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
Simulation |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
ETC-PZL and other |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
4,952 |
|
|
$ |
3,343 |
|
|
$ |
8,675 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
4,954 |
|
|
$ |
6,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Systems Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
2,634 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
561 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
936 |
|
Sterilizers |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
Hyperbaric |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
` |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
` |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
Service and spares |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company total |
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
6,587 |
|
|
$ |
4,239 |
|
|
$ |
13,244 |
|
|
$ |
2,877 |
|
|
$ |
1,676 |
|
|
$ |
5,307 |
|
|
$ |
9,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $13,244,000 as compared to $9,860,000
for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase of $3,384,000 or 34.3%. As the table indicates,
significant increases were realized in the U.S. Government market offset in part in by a decline in
Domestic and International sales.
Domestic Sales
Domestic sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $2,418,000 as compared to $2,877,000
in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $459,000 or 16.0%, reflecting a decrease in the
sterilizer product line (down $448,000). Domestic sales represented 18.3% of the Companys total
sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to 29.2% for the second quarter of fiscal
2010.
U.S. Government Sales
U.S. Government sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $6,587,000 as compared to
$1,676,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase of $4,911,000 or 293.0%, and
represented 49.7% of total sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 versus 17.0% for the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. This increase is the result of sales of the Companys Pilot Training
Systems products under contracts from the U.S. Navy for a research disorientation trainer and the
U.S. Air Force to provide a high performance training and research human centrifuge and a suite of
altitude chambers.
International Sales
For the second quarter of fiscal 2011, international sales (which include sales made by the
Companys foreign subsidiaries) were $4,239,000 as compared to $5,307,000 in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, a decrease of $1,068,000 or 20.1%, and represented 32.0% of total sales, as compared
to 53.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. International performance reflected lower simulation
sales (down $1,444,000) primarily for a contract in the Middle East which was completed in fiscal
2010. For the thirteen week period ended August 27, 2010, there were sales to the Korean government
for $3,374,000. For the thirteen week period ended August 28, 2009, there were sales to or relating
to governments or commercial accounts in Saudi Arabia of $3,582,000.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $4,794,000 as compared to $4,956,000 in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $162,000 or 3.3%. As a percentage of sales, gross
profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was 36.2% compared to 50.3% for the same period a year
ago. The decrease in gross profit reflects a 14.1 percentage point reduction in the gross margin
rate as a percentage of sales due to the higher concentration of U.S. Government contract work
compared to higher margin international sales in the prior period.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $1,020,000 as
compared to $1,270,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $250,000 or 19.7%. This
decrease primarily reflected reduced bid and proposal expenses and reduced commissions on the mix
shift in sales in the current quarter to higher U.S. Government sales.
27
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $1,623,000 as
compared to $1,568,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase of $55,000 or 3.5%.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses, which are charged to operations as incurred, were $240,000
for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to $227,000 for the second quarter of fiscal
2010. Most of the Companys research efforts, which were and continue to be a significant cost of
its business, are included in cost of sales for applied research for specific contracts, as well as
research for feasibility and technology updates.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt
(the Subordinated Note) of $224,000, which represented the unamortized portion of the debt discount
that was recorded at the issuance of this instrument. This charge resulted from the exchange of
subordinated debt for preferred stock under the Lenfest Financing Transaction which was completed
in July 2009. See Note 6 Long-term Obligations and Credit Arrangements in the accompanying Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $189,000 as compared to $350,000
for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, representing a decrease of $161,000 or 46.0%, reflecting
reduced bank borrowing and the July 2009 exchange of the Subordinated Note for preferred stock.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net, was $56,000 for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 versus $66,000 for the
second quarter of fiscal 2010. These expenses consist primarily of bank and letter of credit fees
as well as foreign currency exchange gains or losses.
Income Taxes
Due to the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards available the Company did not
record a provision for income taxes for the thirteen week periods ended August 27, 2010 or August
28, 2009.
The Company has reviewed the components of its deferred tax asset and has determined, based
upon all available information, that its current and expected future operating income will more
likely than not result in the realization of a portion of its deferred tax assets relating
primarily to its net operating loss carryforwards. As of August 27, 2010, the Company had
approximately $34 million of federal net loss carry forwards available to offset future income tax
liabilities, beginning to expire in 2025. In addition, the Company has the ability to offset
deferred tax assets against deferred tax liabilities created for such items as depreciation and
amortization.
28
Results of Operations
Twenty-six week period ended August 27, 2010 compared to the twenty-six week period ended August 28, 2009
We have historically experienced significant variability in our quarterly revenue, earnings
and other operating results, and our performance may fluctuate significantly in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Table of Results |
|
|
Twenty-six |
|
|
Twenty-six week |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
week period ended |
|
|
period ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, |
|
|
August 28, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
( ) = Unfavorable |
|
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
|
$ |
4,836 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
US Government |
|
|
10,573 |
|
|
|
3,512 |
|
|
|
7,061 |
|
|
|
201.1 |
|
International |
|
|
9,456 |
|
|
|
11,093 |
|
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
25,365 |
|
|
|
19,441 |
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
9,924 |
|
|
|
9,383 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses |
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Environmental Tectonics
Corporation |
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
% |
Preferred stock dividend |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
(64.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,133 |
|
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information (restated): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
The Company had a net income attributable to ETC of $3,602,000 or $0.12 per share (diluted)
during the first half of fiscal 2011 compared to net income attributable to ETC of $2,019,000 or
$0.09 (diluted), for the first half of fiscal 2010, representing an improvement of $1,583,000 or
78.4%. The improvement reflected an increase in gross profit (reflecting the higher sales level)
coupled with lower operating expenses and interest expense. Increased research and development
expenses acted as a partial offset. Due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, no
provision for income taxes was recorded in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010.
29
Sales
The following schedule presents the Companys sales by segment, business unit and geographic
area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Twenty-six week period ended |
|
|
Twenty-six week period ended |
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
|
August 28, 2009 |
Segment sales: |
|
Domestic |
|
|
USG |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
USG |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Training Services Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilot Training Services |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
8,955 |
|
|
$ |
6,601 |
|
|
$ |
15,616 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
|
$ |
9,517 |
|
Simulation |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
3,038 |
|
ETC-PZL and other |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
8,955 |
|
|
$ |
7,238 |
|
|
$ |
16,607 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
$ |
10,196 |
|
|
$ |
13,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Systems Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental |
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
1,618 |
|
|
$ |
1,863 |
|
|
$ |
3,702 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
1,052 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
2,070 |
|
Sterilizers |
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
Hyperbaric |
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
Service and spares |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,922 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
8,758 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company total |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
|
$ |
10,573 |
|
|
$ |
9,456 |
|
|
$ |
25,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,836 |
|
|
$ |
3,512 |
|
|
$ |
11,093 |
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for the first half of fiscal 2011 were $25,365,000 as compared to $19,441,000 for
the first half of fiscal 2010, an increase of $5,924,000 or 30.5%. As the table indicates,
significant increases were realized in the U.S. Government and Domestic markets offset in part in
by a decline in International sales.
Domestic Sales
Domestic sales in the first half of fiscal 2011 were $5,336,000 as compared to $4,836,000 in
the first half of fiscal 2010, an increase of $500,000 or 10.3%, reflecting a significant increase
in the sterilizer product line (up $1,058,000) of our Control Systems Group, partially offset by
declines in most other product areas. Domestic sales represented 21.0% of the Companys total sales
in the first half of fiscal 2011, as compared to 24.9% for the first half of fiscal 2010.
U.S. Government Sales
U.S. Government sales in the first half of fiscal 2011 were $10,573,000 as compared to
$3,512,000 in the first half of fiscal 2010, an increase of $7,061,000 or 201.1%, and represented
41.7% of total sales in the first half of fiscal 2011 versus 18.1% for the first half of fiscal
2010. This increase is the result of sales of the Companys Pilot Training Systems products under
contracts from the U.S. Navy for a research disorientation trainer and the U.S. Air Force to
provide a high performance training and research human centrifuge and a suite of altitude chambers.
International Sales
For the first half of fiscal 2011, international sales (which include sales made by the
Companys foreign subsidiaries) were $9,456,000 as compared to $11,093,000 in the first half of
fiscal 2010, a decrease of $1,637,000 or 14.8%, and represented 37.3% of total sales, as compared
to 57.0% in the first half of fiscal 2010. International performance reflected lower simulation
sales (down $2,492,000) primarily for a contract in the Middle East which was completed in fiscal
2010. For the first half of fiscal 2011, there were sales to the Korean government for $7,847,000.
For the first half of fiscal 2010, there were sales to or relating to governments or commercial
accounts in Saudi Arabia of $6,666,000.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the first half of fiscal 2011 was $9,924,000 as compared to $9,383,000 in the
first half of fiscal 2010, an increase of $541,000 or 5.8%. The improvement in gross profit was due
to an increase in both governmental and domestic sales, and was partially offset by the reduction
in higher margin international sales. As a percentage of sales, gross profit for the first half of
fiscal 2011 was 39.1% compared to 48.3% for the same period a year ago. The 9.2 percentage point
reduction in the gross margin rate as a percentage of sales primarily reflected reductions in the
ATS and simulation product areas.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses for the first half of fiscal 2011 were $2,122,000 as compared
to $2,524,000 in the first half of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $402,000 or 15.9%. This decrease
primarily reflected reduced bid and proposal expenses and reduced commissions on the shift in sales
mix in the first half of fiscal 2011 to U.S. Government sales.
30
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the first half of fiscal 2011 were $3,086,000 as
compared to $3,170,000 in the first half of fiscal 2010, a decrease of $84,000 or 2.6%.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses, which are charged to operations as incurred, were $564,000
for the first half of fiscal 2011 as compared to $455,000 for the first half of fiscal 2010. The
first half of fiscal 2010 reflected higher grant funds from the Turkish Government. Most of the
Companys research efforts, which were and continue to be a significant cost of its business, are
included in cost of sales for applied research for specific contracts, as well as research for
feasibility and technology updates.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
In the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt (the
Subordinated Note) of $224,000, which represented the unamortized portion of the debt discount that
was recorded at the issuance of this instrument. This charge resulted from the exchange of
subordinated debt for preferred stock under the Lenfest Financing Transaction which was completed
in July 2009. See Note 6 Long-term Obligations and Credit Arrangements in the accompanying Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the first half of fiscal 2011 was $417,000 as compared to $866,000 for
the first half of fiscal 2010, representing a decrease of $449,000 or 51.9%, reflecting reduced
bank borrowing and the July 2009 exchange of the Subordinated Note for preferred stock.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net, was $128,000 for the first half of fiscal 2011 versus $121,000 for the
first half of fiscal 2010. These expenses consist primarily of bank and letter of credit fees as
well as foreign currency exchange gains or losses.
Income Taxes
Due to the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards available the Company did not
record a provision for income taxes in the first half of fiscal 2011 or 2010.
The Company has reviewed the components of its deferred tax asset and has determined, based
upon all available information, that its current and expected future operating income will more
likely than not result in the realization of a portion of its deferred tax assets relating
primarily to its net operating loss carryforwards. As of August 27, 2010, the Company had
approximately $34 million of federal net loss carry forwards available to offset future income tax
liabilities, beginning to expire in 2025. In addition, the Company has the ability to offset
deferred tax assets against deferred tax liabilities created for such items as depreciation and
amortization.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys liquidity position and borrowing availability improved significantly during the
first half of fiscal 2011. Cash flow from operating activities was $5,720,000. Working capital
(current assets less current liabilities) was $15,991,000 and the Companys current ratio (current
assets divided by current liabilities) was 2.20. The Company repaid over $1 million under its line
of credit agreement and repurchased $1,500,000 of Series E Preferred Stock from Lenfest. This
positive performance primarily reflected the net income in the period and milestone payment
collections under long term contracts.
The Company believes that it will have adequate cash from operations and existing credit
facilities, including the $20 million PNC Line of Credit and the $7.5 Lenfest Credit Facility, to
allow it to effectively and efficiently execute the requirements of its contracts. As of August 27,
2010, the Company had not utilized any of the $7.5 million available funding under the Lenfest
Credit Facility.
31
As of August 27, 2010, the Companys availability under the Amended and Restated PNC Credit
Agreement was approximately $9,964,000. This reflected cash borrowings of $8,477,000 and
outstanding letters of credit of approximately $1,559,000.
The schedule below presents the Companys available borrowings under its existing credit
facilities (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Available |
|
|
Facility |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Available |
|
Credit facility* |
|
As of August 27, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of February 26, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC line of credit |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,036 |
|
|
$ |
9,964 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,128 |
|
|
$ |
8,872 |
|
Lenfest credit line |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Dedicated line of credit |
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,922 |
|
|
$ |
15,458 |
|
|
$ |
17,464 |
|
|
$ |
32,922 |
|
|
$ |
16,550 |
|
|
$ |
16,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
See Note 6 Long-tem Debt and Credit Arrangements in the accompanying Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash flow from operating activities is driven by income from sales of our products offset by
the timing of receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business.
During the first half of fiscal 2011, we generated $5,720,000 of cash from operating
activities versus $537,000 for the first half of fiscal 2010, an improvement of $5,183,000. Cash
generated in the current period primarily reflected significantly improved operating results,
customer progress payments under long-term POC contracts, and non-cash expenses of depreciation and
amortization. These items were offset in part by a decrease in costs in excess of billings and a
reduction in billings in excess of costs under long-term POC contracts as well as an increase in
prepaid commissions resulting from payments received under POC contracts which have not been
recognized as revenue.
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash used for investing activities primarily relates to funds used for capital expenditures in
property and equipment. These uses of cash are offset by sales and borrowings under our credit
facilities. The Companys investing activities used $958,000 in the first half of fiscal 2011 and
consisted primarily of costs for the continued construction activities and the manufacturing of
demonstration simulators for our NASTAR Center coupled with higher software enhancements for our
Advanced Tactical Fighter Systems technology.
Cash flows from financing activities:
The Companys financing activities used $6,681,000 of cash during the first half of fiscal
2011. This primarily reflected the repayments under the Companys bank line, the funding a secured
letter of credit for a performance guarantee and the repurchase of $1,500,000 of Series E Preferred
Stock from and payments of Series D and E Preferred Stock dividends to Lenfest.
Outlook
We expect to use our cash, cash equivalents and credit facilities for working capital and
general corporate purposes, products, product rights, technologies, property, plant and equipment,
the payment of contractual obligations (including scheduled interest payments on our credit
facilities and dividends on our preferred stock), the potential acquisition of businesses, and/or
the purchase, redemption or retirement of our credit facilities and preferred stock. We expect that
net sales of our currently marketed products should allow us to continue to generate positive
operating cash flow in fiscal 2011.
32
Backlog
Below is a breakdown of the Companys August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010 sales backlog
(amounts in thousands except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010 |
|
Business segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic area: |
|
TSG |
|
|
CSG |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
993 |
|
|
$ |
4,747 |
|
|
$ |
5,740 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
US Government |
|
|
40,959 |
|
|
|
36,744 |
|
|
|
77,703 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
International |
|
|
33,036 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
38,668 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
74,988 |
|
|
$ |
47,123 |
|
|
$ |
122,111 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total |
|
|
61.4 |
% |
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010 |
|
Business segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic area: |
|
TSG |
|
|
CSG |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
3,982 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
US Government |
|
|
49,111 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
49,159 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
International |
|
|
36,244 |
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
43,823 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
85,565 |
|
|
$ |
11,399 |
|
|
$ |
96,964 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total |
|
|
88.2 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our sales backlog at August 27, 2010 and February 26, 2010, for work to be performed and
revenue to be recognized under written agreements after such dates, was $122,111,000 and
$96,964,000, respectively. Of the August 27, 2010 sales backlog, approximately $29,640,000
represents one international contract for multiple aircrew training simulators. Approximately 98%
of the U.S. Government backlog represents three contracts.
The Companys order flow does not follow any seasonal pattern as the Company receives orders
in each fiscal quarter of its fiscal year.
33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Following the submission of the Original Filing, ETC management determined that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective and that material weaknesses in internal
control over financial reporting existed as of August 27, 2010, the end of the period covered by
the Original Filing.
Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures
Subsequent to the end of the period covered by the Original Filing, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the
reports we file under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and (ii) is
accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosures. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurances, however, that the
objectives of the controls systems are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been
detected. Based on that evaluation, and solely as a result of material weaknesses in internal
controls over financial reporting described below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that ETCs disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end
of the period covered by the Original Filing.
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control
over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of interim or annual financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by
the companys internal controls.
ETC management has concluded that the following two material weaknesses existed as of the end
of the period covered by the Original Filing:
First, management performed and completed its annual report on internal control over financial
reporting but failed to include the Annual Report in the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended
February 26, 2010. The failure to include the annual report was the result of an administrative
error made during the preparation and filing of the Form 10-K.
Second, management determined that certain errors were made relating to the calculation and
presentation of the Companys earnings per share in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles. Specifically, the Company did not reflect the participating
features of its Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock when calculating its earnings
per share in financial statements for certain prior periods.
Remediation Efforts
ETCs remediation efforts, as outlined below, are designed to address the material weaknesses
identified by management and to strengthen the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Specifically, the Company has implemented the following procedural remediation steps to
address the material weaknesses described above and to improve its internal control over financial
reporting:
|
|
|
Company management will prepare, publish and enforce a detailed reporting
schedule which will allow adequate time for proper review by a newly formed
compliance disclosure committee. This committee will include Company accounting
personnel, the Companys General Counsel and the Companys key operations personnel.
The role of this committee will be to assure that all public filings have been
reviewed for regulatory compliance and adequate disclosure and that all suggested
revisions have been properly incorporated; |
|
|
|
|
Company management will review all procedural controls to ensure that (1) all
process participants clearly understand their respective individual roles and the
overall control environment, and (2) downstream controls and other checks and
balances in the control environment are functioning adequately; and |
|
|
|
|
if appropriate, for specific non-routine complex accounting transactions,
management will engage a separate accounting firm to support management in
accounting for these transactions. |
34
These material weaknesses were previously disclosed on January 11, 2011, in the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 26, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Except as noted above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most
recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Mends International, Ltd.
On May 29, 2008, a Request for Arbitration was filed against the Company with the Secretariat
of the International Court of Arbitration by Mends International Ltd. (Mends). Mends Request
for Arbitration arose out of a February 3, 1999 contract between the Company and Mends wherein
Mends purchased aeromedical equipment for sale to the Nigerian Air Force. On July 1, 2010, the
International Court of Arbitration issued a Partial Final Award which was within the scope of the
Companys reserve and which did not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or results of operations. Additionally, the International Court of Arbitration may make
an additional award to allocate the costs of the arbitration (including attorneys fees) between
the parties. It is not expected that any additional award, if any, will have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position or results of operation.
Administrative Agreement with U.S. Navy
In 2007, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Department of the Navy to
resolve litigation filed by the Company in May 2003 in connection with a contract for submarine
rescue decompression chambers. As of May 14, 2008, the Company had made all payments required
under this settlement agreement and had transferred the chambers to the Department of the Navy.
From October 2, 2007 through December 12, 2007, the Company was suspended by the Department of the
Navy from soliciting work for the federal government pursuant to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation. However, effective December 12, 2007, the Department of the Navy lifted the Companys
suspension pursuant to the execution by the Company and the Department of the Navy of an
Administrative Agreement. In accordance with the Administrative Agreement, the Company has
established and implemented a program of compliance reviews, audits, and reports.
Other Matters
Certain other claims, suits, and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business have
been filed or are pending against us. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel
handling these specific matters, all such matters are reserved for or adequately covered by
insurance or, if not so covered, are without merit or are of such kind, or involve such amounts, as
would not have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations if disposed
of unfavorably.
35
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Number |
|
Item |
3.1
|
|
Registrants Articles of Incorporation, as amended, were filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended February
28, 1997 and are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Registrants amended and restated By-Laws were filed as Exhibit 3.2
to Registrants Form 8-K dated July 6, 2009, and are incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Registrants amended and restated By-Laws were filed as Exhibit 3.1
to Registrants Form 8-K dated July 28, 2010, and are incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amendment to Loan Documents dated as of May 7, 2010, between the
Registrant, H.F. Lenfest and PNC Bank, National Association was
filed on June 1, 2010 as Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K and is
incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amendment to Loan Documents dated as of June 2, 2010 between the
Registrant and PNC Bank, National Association was filed on July 12,
2010 as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amendment to Loan Documents dated as of August 18, 2010 between the
Registrant and PNC Bank, National Association was filed on August
20, 2010 as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification dated March 15, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 made by William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification dated March 15, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 made by Duane D. Deaner, Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification dated March 15, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 made by William F. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer, and
Duane D. Deaner, Chief Financial Officer. |
36
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: March 15, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ William F. Mitchell
|
|
|
|
William F. Mitchell |
|
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 15, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Duane Deaner
|
|
|
|
Duane Deaner, |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
37