e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 1-14771
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
04-2962824
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10 M Commerce Way, Woburn, MA 01801
(Address of principal executive offices)
(781) 994-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such
files).
o
Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (check one).
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company
þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange
Act). o Yes
þ No
As of October 31, 2010, 14,266,345 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
MICROFINANCIAL
INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
Net investment in leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due in installments |
|
|
187,786 |
|
|
|
175,615 |
|
Estimated residual value |
|
|
21,090 |
|
|
|
19,014 |
|
Initial direct costs |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance lease payments and deposits |
|
|
(3,284 |
) |
|
|
(2,411 |
) |
Unearned income |
|
|
(58,458 |
) |
|
|
(55,821 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
|
|
(13,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases |
|
|
135,651 |
|
|
|
124,050 |
|
|
Investment in rental contracts, net |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
139,228 |
|
|
$ |
127,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
$ |
59,955 |
|
|
$ |
51,906 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,812 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
70,439 |
|
|
|
60,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
14,266,345 and 14,174,326 shares issued at September 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
46,585 |
|
|
|
46,197 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
22,061 |
|
|
|
20,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
68,789 |
|
|
|
66,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
139,228 |
|
|
$ |
127,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
8,790 |
|
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
|
$ |
25,421 |
|
|
$ |
21,522 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
Service fees and other |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
12,897 |
|
|
|
11,970 |
|
|
|
37,836 |
|
|
|
33,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,356 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
10,167 |
|
|
|
10,413 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
17,462 |
|
|
|
15,883 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Interest |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
9,799 |
|
|
|
9,977 |
|
|
|
31,701 |
|
|
|
29,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,263,726 |
|
|
|
14,170,079 |
|
|
|
14,235,086 |
|
|
|
14,138,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,492,842 |
|
|
|
14,328,613 |
|
|
|
14,454,201 |
|
|
|
14,242,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
4
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
14,038,257 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
45,774 |
|
|
$ |
18,424 |
|
|
$ |
64,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for deferred compensation |
|
|
131,069 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Common stock dividends ($0.20 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
|
4,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
14,174,326 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
46,197 |
|
|
$ |
20,426 |
|
|
$ |
66,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for deferred compensation |
|
|
88,269 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Common stock dividends ($0.15 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
14,266,345 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
46,585 |
|
|
$ |
22,061 |
|
|
$ |
68,789 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
5
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from customers |
|
$ |
69,054 |
|
|
$ |
55,433 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(11,980 |
) |
|
|
(11,530 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
(1,919 |
) |
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
Interest received |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
54,196 |
|
|
|
41,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in lease and rental contracts |
|
|
(58,120 |
) |
|
|
(56,749 |
) |
Investment in direct costs |
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
(980 |
) |
Investment in property and equipment |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(59,087 |
) |
|
|
(57,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured debt |
|
|
75,678 |
|
|
|
66,487 |
|
Repayment of secured debt |
|
|
(67,629 |
) |
|
|
(52,605 |
) |
Payments of debt closing costs |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
Proceeds from capital lease obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Repayment of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
|
|
(2,118 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
11,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(4,507 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs |
|
|
(25,421 |
) |
|
|
(21,522 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
17,462 |
|
|
|
15,883 |
|
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value |
|
|
54,144 |
|
|
|
40,968 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
54,196 |
|
|
$ |
41,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value of stock issued for compensation |
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
6
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
A. Nature of Business
MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as MicroFinancial, we, us or our) operates
primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. (TimePayment) and Leasecomm
Corporation (Leasecomm). TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases
and rents microticket equipment and provides other financing services. The average amount
financed by TimePayment during 2010 year to date was
approximately $5,700 compared to the 2009 amount of
$5,500. Leasecomm historically financed contracts of approximately $1,900 but no longer originates
leases. We primarily source our originations through a nationwide network of independent
equipment vendors, sales organizations, brokers and other dealer-based origination networks. We
fund our operations through cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our
revolving line of credit.
B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements.
Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required
for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The results for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
full year ending December 31, 2010.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size of
each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual transactions
for the purpose of developing and determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.
Rather, we have developed a sophisticated, risk-adjusted pricing model and have automated the
credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper risk-adjusted
pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have priced
appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we
experience a relatively high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically
review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making
appropriate credit decisions. Contracts in our portfolio are not re-graded subsequent to the
initial extension of credit and the allowance is not allocated to specific contracts. Rather, we
view the contracts as having common characteristics and maintain a general allowance against our
entire portfolio utilizing historical collection statistics and an assessment of current credit
risk in the portfolio as the basis for the amount.
We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an
appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the
likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the portfolio at each reporting period based upon
a combination of the lessees bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current
delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other relevant
factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool
analyses of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant
factors which might affect the
performance of our portfolio. This combination of historical experience, credit scores,
delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide the basis
for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. We charge-off our receivables
when such receivables are deemed uncollectible. In general, a
7
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
receivable is deemed uncollectible when it is 360 days past due or earlier, when other adverse
events occur with respect to an account. Historically, the typical monthly payment under our
microticket leases has been small and as a result, our experience is that lessees will pay past due
amounts later in the process because of the small amount necessary to bring an account current.
A summary of the activity in our allowance for credit losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Allowance for credit losses, beginning |
|
$ |
13,856 |
|
|
$ |
11,722 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
17,462 |
|
|
|
15,883 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(21,598 |
) |
|
|
(16,871 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
3,273 |
|
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses, ending |
|
$ |
12,993 |
|
|
$ |
13,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
payable, the revolving line of credit, and other liabilities, we believe that the carrying amount
approximates fair value. The fair value of the revolving line of credit is calculated based on
incremental borrowing rates currently available on loans with similar terms and maturities.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net
income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that would have an antidilutive
effect on net income per common share. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, 499,305
options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was
antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 849,305 options were excluded from the
computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the three
months ended September 30, 2009, 849,305 options were excluded from the computation of diluted net
income per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, 1,108,028 options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because
their effect was antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
2,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
14,263,726 |
|
|
|
14,170,079 |
|
|
|
14,235,086 |
|
|
|
14,138,374 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock
options, warrants and restricted stock |
|
|
229,116 |
|
|
|
158,534 |
|
|
|
219,115 |
|
|
|
104,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computation of net income
per common share diluted |
|
|
14,492,842 |
|
|
|
14,328,613 |
|
|
|
14,454,201 |
|
|
|
14,242,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Stock-Based Employee Compensation
Under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for
issuance. In February 2010, under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation and Benefits
Committee of our Board of Directors granted 33,518 restricted stock units to our executive
officers. The restricted stock units vest over five years at 25% annually beginning on the second
anniversary of the grant date. The restricted stock units were valued on the date of grant and the
fair value of these awards was $3.15 per share.
In February 2009, under that plan, we granted 10 year options to our executive officers to
purchase 321,058 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.30 per share. The fair value of
these awards was $0.55 per share. The options were valued at the date of grant using the following
assumptions: expected life in years of 6.50, annualized volatility of 55.54%, expected dividend
yield of 8.70%, and a riskfree interest rate of 2.28%. The options vest over five years
beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 350,000 options originally granted to members
of the Board of Directors in February 2000 expired. During the nine months ended September 30,
2009, 400,000 options originally granted to members of the Board of Directors in February of 1999
expired. In addition, 105,097 options granted to the former VP of Sales were forfeited upon his
last date of employment in May 2009.
The following summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,258,028 |
|
|
$ |
1.585 to $13.10 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(350,000 |
) |
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
908,028 |
|
|
$ |
1.585 to $13.10 |
|
|
$ |
6.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of September 30, 2010, $233,000 of unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options
is expected to be recognized over the estimated remaining life of
4.5 years.
In February 2010, we granted our non-employee directors a total of 53,844 shares of stock with
immediate vesting and a fair value of $3.15 per share in accordance with our directors compensation
policy.
In July 2010, we granted our non-employee directors a total of 34,425 shares of stock with
immediate vesting and a fair value of $3.66 per share in accordance with our directors compensation
policy.
Director John Everets was appointed to the Board as a non employee director on August 15,
2006. In connection with his appointment he was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock which
vested 20% upon grant and 5% on the first day of each quarter subsequent to the grant date. The
restricted share fair value was $3.35 per share.
The compensation expense associated with the grant is recognized as vesting occurs. The final
unvested portion of this grant vested on the first day of our third fiscal quarter of 2010. As of
September 30, 2010, there are no unvested restricted shares under Mr. Everets grant.
9
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
Number |
|
Recognized |
|
Number |
|
Recognized |
|
|
of |
|
Compensation |
|
of |
|
Compensation |
|
|
Shares |
|
Expense |
|
Shares |
|
Expense |
Non-vested at
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
88,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(92,019 |
) |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of September 30, 2010, $91,000 of total unrecognized
stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted
stock units is expected to be recognized over an estimated remaining life of
4.3 years.
|
|
Information relating to our outstanding stock options at September 30, 2010 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
Exercise Price |
|
Shares |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Value |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
$13.10
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.10 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
347,000 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
347,000 |
|
5.77
|
|
|
31,923 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
|
|
142,382 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
35,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
258,723 |
|
|
|
8.42 |
|
|
|
414,000 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
908,028 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
$ |
761,000 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
510,596 |
|
|
$ |
347,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the total share based compensation
cost recognized was $32,000 and $27,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, the total share based employee compensation cost
recognized was $93,000 and $60,000,
respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits with various commercial banks and highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when acquired. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost, which approximates market value.
Concentration of Credit Risk
We deposit our cash and invest in short-term investments primarily through national commercial
banks. Deposits in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the institution. The Company maintains cash
deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance coverage.
C. Revolving line of credit
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a three-year revolving line of credit with Sovereign Bank
(Sovereign) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. The total commitment under the
facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased to $60 million in July 2008, to
$85 million in February 2009, and most recently to $100 million in connection with a July 28, 2010
amendment. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security
interest in all of our other assets. Prior to the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore
interest at Prime plus 1.75% or at a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 3.75%, in each
case subject to a minimum rate of 5.00%. Following the July 2010 amendment, outstanding
10
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
borrowings bear interest at Prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 3.25%, without being subject to any
minimum rate. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR
Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan.
At September 30, 2010 $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR loans and $3.0 million were Prime Rate
Loans. The Prime interest rate on
our revolving line of credit was 4.5% at September 30, 2010. The LIBOR loans at September 30, 2010
bear an interest rate between 3.5% and 3.7%. The amount available on our revolving line of credit
at September 30, 2010 was $40.0 million. The revolving line of credit has financial covenants that
we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of September 30, 2010, we
were in compliance with all covenants under the revolving line of credit.
As a part of the July 28, 2010 amendment, the maturity date of the facility was extended to
August 2, 2013. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term
loan.
D. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.
Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively,
will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation
is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that
could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely
assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately
incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we
access the likelihood of loss as probable.
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements that
require future payments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 we borrowed $75.7 million
against our revolving line of credit and repaid $67.6 million. The $60.0 million of outstanding
borrowings as of September 30, 2010 will be repaid by the application of TimePayment receipts and
other payments to our outstanding balance. Our future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable
operating leases are $79,000 through January 31, 2011.
On September 20, 2010 we entered into an office lease agreement for approximately 23,834
square feet of office space located at New England Executive Park in Burlington, MA. We plan to
move our corporate headquarters to the premises in January 2011. The base rent payable under the
lease will be approximately $45,000 monthly through the first twelve months and increases annually
in increments until it reaches a monthly base rent of approximately $52,000 from the 73rd
month to the 90th month.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and, as a result, we have a pipeline of
applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to
lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been
completed, including the receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the
lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is verified, we have no outstanding commitments to
lend.
Dividends
On October 18, 2010, we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on November 15, 2010 to
shareholders of record on November 1, 2010.
11
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Stock Repurchase
On August 10, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program under which, the Company is authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of its outstanding shares
from time to time. The repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block
trades. No purchases were made pursuant to the plan for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
The repurchase program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued
at anytime.
E. Subsequent Events
On November 4, 2010, we repurchased 100 shares of our own common stock at $4 per share under
our stock buyback program.
We have evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through the date on which we issued
these financial statements. Other than the declaration of dividend previously discussed, we did
not have any material subsequent events that impacted our consolidated financial statements.
F. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), codified as FASB Accounting Standard Codification (ASC)
860 Transfers and Servicing. This topic requires entities to provide more information regarding
sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has
continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. FASB ASC 860 eliminates
the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets and requires additional disclosures. FASB ASC 860 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the new content of FASB ASC 860 did not have an
impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS 167), codified as FASB ASC 810-10 Consolidation. This topic modifies how a company
determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting
(or similar rights) should be consolidated. FASB ASC 810-10 clarifies that the determination of
whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entitys
purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the activities of the entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. FASB ASC 810-10 requires an ongoing
reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. FASB
ASC 810-10 also requires additional disclosures about a companys involvement in variable interest
entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. FASB ASC 810-10 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the new contend of
FASB ASC 810-10 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. This update provides amendments to FASB 820-10 Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures that require new disclosures as follows:
|
1. |
|
Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entry should disclose
separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. |
|
|
2. |
|
Activity in level 3 fair value measurements |
|
|
3. |
|
A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each
class of assets and liabilities. |
In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level
3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). The new disclosures and
clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances,
and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-6 which are required for the current year and the adoption
did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. The
provisions of ASU 2010-6 which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 are
currently being evaluated by management to determine if they will have a material on the Companys
future financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20 Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. This guidance expands the disclosures pertaining
to the credit quality of loans and should provide users of the financial statements with a better
overall understanding of the credit risk in the loan portfolio. This guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The provisions of ASU 2010 will not have a material effect on our financial statements but will
require significant additional disclosures.
12
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward-Looking Information
Statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In
addition, words such as believes, anticipates, expects, and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that a number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by
us or on our behalf. Such statements contain a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to: our need for financing in order to originate leases and contracts; our dependence on
point-of-sale authorization systems and expansion into new markets; our significant capital
requirements; risks associated with economic downturns including the higher delinquency rates
associated with such downturns; higher interest rates; intense competition; changes in our
regulatory environment; the availability of qualified personnel, and risks associated with
acquisitions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect
our view only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We cannot assure that we
will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes which could adversely affect our operating
results. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered indicative of results
to be expected in future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may result in fluctuations in
the price of our common stock. Statements relating to past dividend payments or our current
dividend policy should not be construed as a guarantee that any future dividends will be paid. For
a more complete description of the prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, see
the risk factors included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file
from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a specialized commercial finance company that provides microticket equipment leasing
and other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment during 2010 year to date
was approximately $5,700 compared to the 2009 average of $5,700. Leasecomm historically financed
contracts of approximately $1,900, and no longer originates leases. Our existing portfolio
consists of business equipment leased or rented primarily to small commercial enterprises.
We finance the funding of our leases and contracts primarily through cash provided by
operating activities and our revolving line of credit. On August 2, 2007, we entered into a
three-year line of credit with Sovereign Bank based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables.
The total commitment under the facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased
to $60 million in July 2008, to $85 million in February 2009, and most recently to $100 million in
connection with a July 28, 2010 amendment. Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible
lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets. Prior to the July 2010
amendment, outstanding borrowings bore interest at Prime plus 1.75% or at LIBOR plus 3.75%, in each
case subject to a minimum rate of 5%. Following the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings
bear interest at either Prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 3.25%, without being subject to any minimum
rate. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans.
If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically coverts to a Prime Rate Loan. The July
2010 amendment extended the maturity date of the facility to
August 2, 2013. At our option, upon maturity, the
unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term loan.
In a typical lease transaction, we originate a lease through a nationwide network of equipment
vendors, independent sales organizations and brokers. Upon our approval of a lease application and
verification that the lessee has received the equipment and signed the lease, we pay the dealer for
the cost of the equipment, plus the dealers profit margin.
13
Substantially all leases originated or acquired by us are non-cancelable. During the term of
the lease, we are scheduled to receive payments sufficient to cover our borrowing costs and the
cost of the underlying equipment and provide us with an appropriate profit. We pass along some of
the costs of our leases and contracts by charging late fees, prepayment penalties, loss and damage
waiver fees and other service fees, when applicable. Collection fees are imposed based on our
estimate of the costs of collection. The loss and damage waiver fees are charged if a customer
fails to provide proof of insurance and are reasonably related to the cost of replacing the lost or
damaged equipment or product. The initial non-cancelable term of the lease is equal to or less than
the equipments estimated economic life and often provides us with additional revenues based on the
residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease. Initial terms of the leases in our
portfolio generally range from 12 to 60 months, with an average initial term of 44 months as of
December 31, 2009.
Unregistered Purchase of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On August 10, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase
program under which the Company is authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of its outstanding shares
from time to time. The repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block
trades. No purchases were made pursuant to the plan for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
The repurchase program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued
at anytime.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note B to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and in Note B to the
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain accounting policies
are particularly important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of
operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by us and as a result,
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
the related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, terms of
existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information obtained from dealers and
other sources, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies, including revenue recognition, maintaining the allowance for
credit losses, determining provisions for income taxes, and accounting for share-based compensation
are each discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have reviewed and
determined that those policies remain our critical accounting policies and we did not make any
changes in those policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Results of Operations Three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
8,790 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
$ |
7,635 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
2,124 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
12,897 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
$ |
11,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were $12.9 million, an increase
of $0.9 million, or 7.7%, from the three months ended September 30, 2009. The overall increase was
due to an increase of $1.2 million in income on financing leases, partially offset by a decrease of
$0.2 million in rental income, and a decrease of $0.1 million in income on service contracts. The
increase in income on financing leases is a result of the continued growth in new lease
originations. The decline in rental income is the result of the attrition of Leasecomm rental
contracts which is partially offset by TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to
rental status. Service contract revenue continues to decline since we have not funded any new
service contracts since 2004.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
3,356 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,349 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining
corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses remained flat
year over year at $3.4 million for the third quarter. Headcount as of September 30, 2010 was 111
as compared to 106 at the same period in 2009.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
4,969 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
5,437 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.4 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts
and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses decreased by $0.5 million, or
8.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009, while net charge-offs increased by 6.6% to $5.4 million. The 90-day delinquent
lease payments receivable on an exposure basis decreased by 18.4% to $19.9 million at September 30,
2010 compared to $24.5 million at September 30, 2009. The decrease in the allowance reflects
improvements in delinquency levels and improved credit quality of the lease portfolio.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
180.9 |
% |
|
$ |
110 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
% |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
15
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $95,000 and amortization of service
contracts decreased by $3,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in
depreciation is due to an increase in the TimePayment lease
contracts coming to term and converting to rentals. Depreciation and amortization of property and
equipment increased by $199,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2009 primarily due to the abandonment of
a proposed software platform and the related depreciation of costs
capitalized in connection with the project.
Service contracts are recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
We have not originated any new service contracts since 2004 and the service portfolio is fully
amortized.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
751 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense
decreased by $8,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense remained relatively flat as increases in the amounts
outstanding under our revolving line of credit were offset by reductions in the interest rate being
charged as our line of credit, as amended in July 2010, is no longer
subject to a minimum rate. At September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance under our revolving line of credit was
$60.0 million compared to a balance of $47.2 million at September 30, 2009.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,192 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
$ |
767 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by
$425,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009. This increase resulted primarily from the $1.1 million increase in pre-tax
income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2010 we had a liability of $20,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $8,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax matters.
As of September 30, 2010 we had a liability of $20,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $8,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately $18,000
would impact our effective tax rate after a $10,000 federal tax benefit for state income taxes. It
is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change significantly
within the next 12 months; however at this time we are unable to estimate the change.
16
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2007 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2006.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $19.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of
$1.4 million or 6.7%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and net investment in
rental contracts increased from $207.9 million at June 30, 2010 to $211.8 million at September 30,
2010. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $4.4 million, or 29.6%, to $19.2
million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
17
Results of Operations Nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
25,421 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
$ |
21,522 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
5,795 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
6,471 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
(24.5 |
) |
|
|
526 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
3,052 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(92.9 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
37,836 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
$ |
33,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $37.8 million, an
increase of $3.9 million, or 11.4%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The overall
increase was due to an increase of $3.9 million in income on financing leases, and a $0.8 million
increase in fees and other income partially offset by a decrease of $0.7 million in rental income,
and a decrease of $0.1 million in income on service contracts. The increase in income on financing
leases is a result of the continued growth in our lease portfolio. The decline in rental income is
the result of attrition of Leasecomm rental contracts which is partially offset by TimePayment
lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals. Service contract revenue continues to
decline since we have not been actively funding new service contracts.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
10,167 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
10,413 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining
corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses decreased by
$246,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
17,462 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
$ |
15,883 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
46.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts
and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $1.6 million, or
9.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2009, while net charge-offs increased by 33.5% to $18.3 million. The 90-day delinquent lease
payments receivable on an exposure basis decreased by 18.4% to $19.9 million at September 30, 2010
compared to $24.5 million at September 30, 2009. The increase in the allowance reflects the growth
in lease receivables associated with new lease originations and charge off levels which is
partially offset by improved delinquency levels.
18
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
$ |
319 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
1,633 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $287,000 and amortization of service
contracts decreased by $29,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in depreciation is due primarily to the increase
in the number of TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment increased by $217,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 primarily due to the abandonment of a proposed software platform and the related depreciation of costs
capitalized in connection with that project.
Service contracts are recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
We have not funded any new service contracts since 2004 and the service portfolio is now fully
amortized.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
2,439 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,928 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense
increased by $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. This increase resulted primarily from our increased level of
borrowings and debt closing costs on our revolving line of credit which were offset by reductions
in the interest rate being charged as our line of credit, as amended
in July 2010, is no longer subject to a minimum rate. At September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance under our
revolving line of credit was $60.0 million compared to $47.2 million, at September 30, 2009.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
Change |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
2,363 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,761 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by
$602,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
This increase resulted primarily from the $1.6 million increase in pre-tax income.
19
As of December 31, 2009, we had a liability of $32,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and
a liability of $8,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax
matters. As of September 30, 2010 we had a liability of $20,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and
a liability of $8,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately $18,000
would impact our effective tax rate after a $10,000 federal tax benefit for state income taxes.
The decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits relates to $12,000 release of closed audits. It is
reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change significantly
within the next 12 months; however at this time we are unable to estimate the change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2007 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2006.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $58.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of
$1.0 million or 1.7%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investments in service contracts and investment in
rental contracts increased from $197.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $211.8 million at September
30, 2010. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $12.3 million, or 29.3%, to $54.2
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Exposure to Credit Losses
The amounts in the table below represent the balance of delinquent receivables on an exposure
basis for all leases, rental contracts, and service contracts in our portfolio. An exposure basis
aging classifies the entire receivable based on the invoice that is the most delinquent. For
example, in the case of a rental or service contract, if a receivable is 90 days past due, all
amounts billed and unpaid are placed in the over 90 days past due category. In the case of lease
receivables, where the minimum contractual obligation of the lessee is booked as a receivable at
the inception of the lease, if a receivable is 90 days past due, the entire receivable, including
all amounts billed and unpaid as well as the minimum contractual obligation yet to be billed, will
be placed in the over 90 days past due category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
Current |
|
$ |
157,445 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
% |
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
% |
31-60 days past due |
|
|
5,759 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
5,336 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Over 90 days past due |
|
|
19,944 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
24,046 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross receivables due in installments |
|
$ |
187,786 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
175,615 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our lease and finance business is capital-intensive and requires access to substantial credit
to fund lease originations. Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through
borrowings under our credit facilities, on-balance sheet securitizations, the issuance of
subordinated debt, free cash flow and our initial public offering completed in February 1999. We
will continue to require significant additional capital to maintain and expand our funding of
leases and contracts, as well as to fund any future acquisitions of leasing companies or
portfolios. In the near term, we expect to finance our business utilizing the cash on hand and our
revolving line of credit which matures in August 2013. Additionally, our uses of cash include the
payment of interest and principal on borrowings, selling, general and administrative expenses,
income taxes and capital expenditures.
20
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, our primary sources of liquidity were
cash provided by operating activities and borrowings on our revolving line of credit. We generated
cash flow from operations of
$54.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $41.9 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, we had approximately $60.0 million
outstanding under our revolving credit facility and had available borrowing capacity of
approximately $40.0 million as described below.
We used net cash in investing activities of $59.1 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and $58.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Investing
activities primarily relate to the origination of leases and the increase in cash used is
consistent with our focused and targeted sales and marketing effort.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $5.0 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and net cash provided by financing activities was $11.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Financing activities primarily consist of the borrowings and repayments under
our revolving line of credit and dividend payments. There were no shares repurchased pursuant to
our approved stock buyback program through September 30, 2010.
We believe that cash flows from our existing portfolio, cash on hand, and available borrowings
under our amended credit facility will be sufficient to support our operations and anticipated
lease origination activity in the near term.
Borrowings
We utilize our credit facility to fund the origination and acquisition of leases that satisfy
the eligibility requirements established pursuant to the facility. Borrowings outstanding consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Interest |
|
Unused |
|
Facility |
|
Amounts |
|
Interest |
|
Unused |
|
Facility |
(dollars in 000) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Capacity |
|
Amount |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Capacity |
|
Amount |
Revolving credit
facility
(1)
|
|
$ |
59,995 |
|
|
3.5%-4.5%
|
|
$ |
40,005 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,906 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
33,094 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unused capacity is subject to the borrowing base formula. |
On August 2, 2007,
we entered into a three-year revolving line of credit with Sovereign
based on qualified lease receivables. The total commitment under the facility was subsequently
$100 million in connection with a July 28, 2010 amendment. Outstanding borrowings are
collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all of our other assets.
Following the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bear interest at Prime plus 1.25% or
LIBOR plus 3.25%, without any minimum rate. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate
Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically
converts a Prime Rate Loan. At September 30, 2010 $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR Loans and
$3.0 million were Prime Rate Loans. At September 30, 2009 all of our loans were Prime Rate Loans.
The Prime interest rate on the revolving line of credit was 4.5% at September 30, 2010. The LIBOR
loans at September 30, 2010 bear an interest rate between 3.5% and 3.7%. As of September 30, 2010
the qualified lease receivables eligible under the borrowing base exceeded the $100 million
revolving line of credit. The revolving line of credit has financial covenants that we must comply
with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of September 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all covenants under the revolving line of credit. As part of the July 2010
amendment, the maturity date of the facility was extended to August 2, 2013.
Dividends
On October 18, 2010, we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on November 15, 2010 to
shareholders of record on November 1, 2010.
On July 19, 2010, we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on August 13, 2010 to shareholders
of record on July 29, 2010. On January 22, 2010 we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on February
15, 2010 to shareholders
21
of record on February 1, 2010. On April 20, 2010, we declared a dividend
of $0.05 payable on May 14, 2010 to shareholders of record on May 3, 2010.
On October 19, 2009 we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on November 13, 2009 to
shareholders of record on October 30, 2009. On July 14, 2009 we declared a dividend of $0.05
payable on August 14, 2009 to shareholders of record on July 30, 2009. On April 16, 2009 we
declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on May 8, 2009 to shareholders of record on April 30, 2009.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we declared a dividend of $0.05 payable on January
19, 2009 to shareholders of record as of January 5, 2009.
Future dividend payments are subject to ongoing review and evaluation by our Board of
Directors. The decision as to the amount and timing of future dividends, if any, will be made in
light of our financial condition, capital requirements and growth plans, as well as our external
financing arrangements and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. We can give
no assurance as to the amount and timing of future dividends.
Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements that
require future payments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 we borrowed $75.7 million
against our revolving line of credit and repaid $67.6 million. The $60.0 million of outstanding
borrowings as of September 30, 2010 will be repaid by the application of TimePayment receipts and
other payments to our outstanding balance. Our future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable
operating leases are $79,000 through January 31, 2011.
On September 20, 2010 we entered into an office lease agreement for approximately 23,834
square feet of office space located at 16 New England Executive Park in Burlington, MA. We plan to
move our corporate headquarters to the premises in January 2011. The base rent payable under the
lease will be approximately $45,000 monthly through the first twelve months and increases annually
in increments until it reaches a monthly base rent of approximately $52,000 from the
73rd month to the 90th month.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have
been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become
binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including but
not limited to the receipt of a complete and accurate lease document, all required supporting
information and successful verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is
successfully verified, we have no firm outstanding commitments to lend.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note E of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
22
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The following discussion about our risk management activities includes forward-looking
statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. In the normal course of operations, we also face risks
that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and
legal risk, and are not represented in the analysis that follows.
The implicit yield on all of our leases and contracts is on a fixed interest rate basis due to
the leases and contracts having scheduled payments that are fixed at the time of origination. When
we originate or acquire leases or contracts, we base our pricing in part on the spread we expect to
achieve between the implicit yield on each lease or contract and the effective interest rate we
expect to incur in financing such lease or contract through our credit facility. Increases in
interest rates during the term of each lease or contract could narrow or eliminate the spread, or
result in a negative spread.
Given the relatively short average life of our leases and contracts, our goal is to maintain a
blend of fixed and variable interest rate obligations which limits our interest rate risk. As of
September 30, 2010, we had repaid all of our fixed-rate debt and had $60.0 million of outstanding
variable interest rate obligations under our revolving line of credit.
Our revolving line of credit bears interest at rates which fluctuate with changes in the Prime
Rate or LIBOR; therefore, our interest expense is sensitive to changes in market interest rates.
The effect of a 10% adverse change in market interest rates, sustained for one year, on our
interest expense would be immaterial.
We maintain an investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy guidelines. The
primary objectives of the investment guidelines are to preserve capital, maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating needs, and to maximize return. We minimize investment risk by
limiting the amount invested in any single security and by focusing on conservative investment
choices with short terms and high credit quality standards. We do not use derivative financial
instruments or invest for speculative trading purposes.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures: As of the end of the period covered by this report, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and
procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Internal controls over financial reporting: During the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2010, no changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting that materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
23
Part II Other Information
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.
Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively,
will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation
is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that
could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely
assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately
incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we
assess the likelihood of loss as probable.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of the material risks that we face relating to our business, financial
performance and industry, as well as other risks that an investor in our common stock may face, see
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere
in this report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or operating results.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits index
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Organization, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
in the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-56639, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 1998). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 in the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 28, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Agreement and Amendment No. 2, dated July 28, 2010, to Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated July 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 2, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Office Lease Agreement dated September 20, 2010. |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MicroFinancial Incorporated
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard F. Latour
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James R. Jackson Jr.
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 15, 2010
25