prer14a
SCHEDULE 14A
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1)
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
FIRST BANCORP.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Not Applicable
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule, and the date of its filing. |
|
1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
4) |
|
Date Filed: |
1519 PONCE DE LEON AVENUE
SANTURCE, PUERTO RICO 00908
(787) 729-8200
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of First BanCorp:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors and Section 3 of the Corporations By-laws,
that a Special Meeting of Stockholders of First BanCorp will be
held at our principal offices located at 1519 Ponce de Leon
Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on August 24, 2010, at
10:00 a.m., for the purpose of considering and taking
action on the following matters, all of which are described in
the accompanying Proxy Statement:
(1) To approve the issuance of up to
256,401,610 shares of the Corporations Common Stock
in exchange (the Exchange Offer) for shares of the
Corporations Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series A, B, C, D and E (Preferred
Stock), in accordance with applicable New York Stock
Exchange rules;
(2) To approve the issuance of shares of the
Corporations Common Stock in the Exchange Offer to
Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of the Board of
Directors, in exchange for his shares of Preferred Stock in
accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules;
(3) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the
Corporations Restated Articles of Incorporation to
decrease the par value of the Corporations Common Stock
from $1.00 to $0.10;
(4) To approve the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares
of the Corporations Common Stock to The Bank of Nova
Scotia (BNS), in accordance with applicable New York
Stock Exchange rules, if it exercises its anti-dilution right
under the Stockholder Agreement, dated August 24, 2007 (the
Stockholder Agreement), by and between us and BNS,
in connection with the Exchange Offer;
(5) To approve the issuance of shares of the
Corporations Common Stock to BNS, in accordance with
applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, if it exercises its
anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement, in
connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the Fixed
Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series G;
(6) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the
Corporations Restated Articles of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of the
Corporations Common Stock from 750,000,000 to
2,000,000,000; and
(7) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the
Corporations Restated Articles of Incorporation to
implement a reverse stock split.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on
August 2, 2010 are entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the Special Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments
thereof. A list of stockholders as of the Record Date will be
open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose
germane to the Special Meeting, during ordinary business hours,
for a period of ten days prior to the Special Meeting, at our
principal offices.
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting. It is
important that your shares be represented regardless of the
number you own. Even if you plan to be present at the Special
Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and promptly
return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided. If you
attend the Special Meeting, you may vote either in person or by
proxy. You may revoke any proxy that you give at any time prior
to its exercise.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Lawrence Odell
Secretary
Santurce, Puerto Rico
August 2, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
1519 Ponce De Leon Avenue
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908
TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24,
2010
This proxy statement (the Proxy Statement) is
furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on
behalf of the Board of Directors of First BanCorp (the
Corporation) for use at the Special Meeting of
Stockholders to be held at our offices located at 1519 Ponce de
Leon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on August 24, 2010 at
10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof
(the Special Meeting). This Proxy Statement is first
being sent or given to holders of record of our common stock,
par value $1.00 per share (the Common Stock), on or
about August 2, 2010. The Board of Directors has designated
two individuals to serve as proxies to vote the shares
represented at the Special Meeting. Shares represented by
properly executed proxies that are received will be voted at the
Special Meeting in accordance with the instructions specified in
the proxy. If you properly submit a proxy but do not give
instructions on how you want your shares to be voted, your
shares will be voted FOR each proposal by the designated proxies
in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations,
which are described below.
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING
What
information is contained in this Proxy Statement?
The information in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals
to be voted on at the Special Meeting, the voting process, and
other required information.
What is
the purpose of the Special Meeting?
At the Special Meeting, stockholders will act upon the following
matters:
(i) the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common
Stock in exchange (the Exchange Offer) for shares of
our Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A, B, C, D, and E (Preferred Stock);
(ii) the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange
Offer to Director Héctor
M. Nevares-LaCosta,
a member of our Board of Directors, upon his exchange of his
shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock;
(iii) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Restated
Articles of Incorporation (Articles of
Incorporation) to decrease the par value of the Common
Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share;
(iv) the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common
Stock to The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) if it
exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement dated August 24, 2007 (the Stockholder
Agreement) in connection with the Exchange Offer;
(v) the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS if it
exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of
the Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series G (Series G Preferred
Stock), owned by the United States Department of the
Treasury (the U.S. Treasury);
(vi) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
(vii) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of
Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
What
should I receive?
You should receive this Proxy Statement, including exhibits, the
Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy card.
How many
votes do I have?
You will have one vote for every share of Common Stock you owned
as of the close of business on August 2, 2010, the Record
Date for the Special Meeting.
If I am a
holder of shares of Common Stock, but I did not hold my shares
of Common Stock as of the Record Date, am I entitled to
vote?
If you were not a record or beneficial holder of shares of
Common Stock as of the Record Date, you will not be entitled to
vote with respect to such shares.
How many
votes can all stockholders cast?
Stockholders may cast one vote for each of the
Corporations 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock that
were outstanding on the Record Date.
How many
votes must be present to hold the Special Meeting?
A majority of the votes that can be cast must be present either
in person or by proxy to hold the Special Meeting. Proxies
received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be
included in the calculation of the number of shares considered
to be present at the Special Meeting for purposes of determining
whether the majority of the votes that can be cast are present.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee
indicates on the proxy card that it does not have discretionary
authority to vote on a particular matter. Votes cast by proxy or
in person at the Special Meeting will be counted by The Bank of
New York Mellon, an independent third party. We urge you to
vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Special Meeting so
that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be
present for us to hold the Special Meeting.
Why is my
approval necessary for the issuances of shares of Common
Stock?
Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
FBP. As further discussed below, NYSE Listed Company
Manual Section 312.03 requires that we seek stockholder
approval prior to the issuances of Common Stock contemplated by
Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.
What vote
is required and how are abstentions and broker non-votes
treated?
Approval of each of Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, relating
to the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with
applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast
on each such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on
such proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all
of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number
of votes cast.
Approval of Proposal Nos. 3, 6, and 7, relating to
amendments to Article Sixth of the Articles of
Incorporation, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Broker non-votes and
abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast against the
proposed amendments.
How does
the Board recommend that I vote?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of
Common Stock in the Exchange Offer;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the
Exchange Offer to Director Nevares-LaCosta upon his exchange of
his shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles
of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock
from $1.00 to $0.10 per share;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of
Common Stock to BNS if it chooses to exercise its anti-dilution
right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the
Exchange Offer;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS if it
chooses to exercise its anti-dilution right under the
Stockholder Agreement in connection with the conversion of
Series G Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles
of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles
of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
|
How do I
vote?
You can vote either in person at the Special Meeting or by proxy
without attending the Special Meeting.
To vote by proxy, you must:
|
|
|
|
|
fill out the enclosed proxy card, date, sign, and return it in
the enclosed postage-paid envelope;
|
|
|
|
vote by telephone (instructions are on the proxy card); or
|
|
|
|
vote over the Internet (instructions are on the proxy card).
|
Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the
enclosed proxy card. For security reasons, our electronic voting
system has been designed to authenticate your identity as a
stockholder.
If you hold your shares in street name, your
broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will provide you with
materials and instructions for voting your shares.
Can I
vote my shares in person at the Special Meeting?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may
vote your shares in person at the Special Meeting. If you hold
your shares in street name, you must obtain a
valid, legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other
nominee, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Special
Meeting.
What is
the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record
and as a beneficial owner?
Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker,
bank, trustee or other nominee rather than directly in their own
name. As summarized below, there are some differences between
shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Stockholder of Record. If your shares are
registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, you are
considered the stockholder of record with respect to those
shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to
you. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the
Special Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to
attend the Special Meeting, we urge you to vote via the
Internet, by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and
returning the proxy card.
Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held by a
broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the
beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and
these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker,
bank, trustee or other nominee who is considered the stockholder
of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner,
you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other
nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account, and it
will enclose or provide voting instructions for you to use in
directing it on how to vote your shares. The organization that
holds your shares, however, is considered the stockholder of
record for purposes of voting at the Special Meeting.
Accordingly, because you are not the stockholder of record, you
may not vote your shares in person at the Special Meeting unless
you request and
3
obtain a valid, legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or
other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the
Special Meeting. The organization that holds your shares
cannot vote your shares without your instructions, so it is
important that you exercise your right to vote.
Who will
bear the costs of soliciting proxies for the Special
Meeting?
We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies for the Special
Meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be
solicited personally, by telephone or otherwise. The Board of
Directors has engaged the firm of Morrow & Co., LLC to
aid in the solicitation of proxies. The cost is estimated at
$10,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit
proxies but will not receive any additional compensation for
their services. Proxies and proxy materials will also be
distributed at our expense by brokers, nominees, custodians and
other similar parties.
Can I
change my vote?
Yes, you may change your vote. If you are a stockholder of
record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is
exercised by sending in a new proxy card with a later date, or
casting a new vote by telephone or over the Internet, or sending
a written notice of revocation to the President or Secretary of
First BanCorp, at P.O. Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto
Rico
00908-0146,
delivered before the proxy is exercised. If you attend the
Special Meeting and want to vote in person, you may request that
your previously submitted proxy not be used. If your shares are
held in the name of a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee,
that institution will instruct you as to how your vote may be
changed.
What
should I do if I receive more than one set of proxy
materials?
You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including
multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy
cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one
brokerage account, you may receive a separate proxy card for
each brokerage account in which you hold shares. Please
complete, sign, date and return each proxy card that you receive.
Could
other matters be presented at the Special Meeting?
The Board of Directors does not intend to present any business
at the Special Meeting other than that described in the Notice
of Special Meeting of Stockholders.
What
happens if the Special Meeting is postponed or
adjourned?
Your proxy will still be valid and may be voted at the postponed
or adjourned Special Meeting. You will still be able to change
or revoke your proxy until it is voted.
Who can
help answer my questions?
If you have any questions about how to grant or revoke your vote
or need copies of our filings, you should contact Lawrence
Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, by
e-mail at
lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at
787-729-8109.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24,
2010
This Proxy Statement, including exhibits, and the 2009 annual
report to security holders are available at
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/fbp.
You may obtain directions to be able to attend the Special
Meeting and vote in person by contacting Lawrence Odell,
Secretary of the Board of Directors, by
e-mail at
lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at
787-729-8109.
4
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following tables sets forth certain information as of
June 30, 2010, unless otherwise described, with respect to
shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock beneficially
owned (unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes) by:
(1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of
more than 5% of our Common Stock; (2) each director;
(3) each named executive officer (as defined in
Item 402(a)(2) of
Regulation S-K);
and (4) all current directors and executive officers as a
group. Any ownership of Preferred Stock by executives who are
not named executive officers is also shown. This information has
been provided by each of the directors and executive officers at
our request or derived from statements filed with the SEC
pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Beneficial ownership of securities, as shown below, has been
determined in accordance with applicable guidelines issued by
the SEC. Beneficial ownership includes the possession, directly
or indirectly, through any formal or informal arrangement,
either individually or in a group, of voting power (which
includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such
security)
and/or
investment power (which includes the power to dispose of, or to
direct the disposition of, such security).
|
|
(1)
|
Beneficial
Owners of More Than 5% of our Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent of
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(a)
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Class(b)
|
|
The Bank of Nova Scotia
|
|
|
9,250,450
|
(c)
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
44 King Street West 6th Fl.
Toronto, Canada M5H 1H1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR LLC
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
(d)
|
|
|
7.89
|
%
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angel Alvarez-Pérez
|
|
|
6,360,518
|
(e)
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
Condominio Plaza Stella Apt.1504
Avenida Magdalena 1362
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
|
6,220,207
|
(f)
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Trust Portfolio L.P.
|
|
|
4,676,229
|
(g)
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This table does not include the shares of Common Stock that the
U.S. Treasury may acquire pursuant to the warrant to purchase
5,842,259 shares of Common Stock, or 6.31% of the currently
outstanding shares of Common Stock, at an initial exercise price
of $0.7252 per share, or upon conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock that it recently acquired from us.
The warrant was originally issued to the U.S. Treasury at the
time it acquired our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share
(the Series F Preferred Stock), in January 2009
and was amended and restated at the time that we exchanged the
Series F Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends
on the Series F Preferred Stock for shares of a new series
of Series G Preferred Stock, that is convertible into
approximately 380.2 million shares of Common Stock based on
the initial conversion price at any time by the U.S. Treasury or
a successor holder and by us under certain conditions, as
described below under Overview of Proposals
Agreement with the U.S. Treasury. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Based on 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as
of June 30, 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
On August 24, 2007, we entered into a Stockholder Agreement
with BNS, which acquired 9,250,450 shares of Common Stock
in a private placement at a price of $10.25 per share pursuant
to the terms of an investment agreement dated February 15,
2007. BNS filed a Schedule 13D on September 4, 2007
reporting the beneficial ownership of 10% or
9,250,450 shares of Common Stock as of August 24, 2007
and reported that it possessed sole voting power and sole
dispositive power over 9,250,450 shares. |
5
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on
February 16, 2010 in which FMR LLC reported aggregate
beneficial ownership of 7,300,000 shares of the Corporation
as of December 31, 2009. FMR LLC reported that it possessed
sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of
7,300,000 shares. FMR LLC reported that it did not possess
sole power to vote or direct the vote of any shares beneficially
owned. |
|
(e) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on
May 13, 2009 by Mr. Angel Àlvarez-Pérez in
which Mr. Àlvarez-Pérez reported aggregate beneficial
ownership of 6,360,518 shares of the Corporation. Mr.
Àlvarez-Pérez reported that he possessed sole voting
power and sole dispositive power over 6,339,218 shares and
shared voting power and shared dispositive power over
20,300 shares. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
January 29, 2010 in which BlackRock, Inc. reported
aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,220,207 shares of the
Corporation as of December 31, 2009. BlackRock, Inc.
reported that it possessed sole voting power and sole
dispositive power over 6,220,227 shares. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on
February 10, 2010 in which First Trust Portfolios L.P.
and certain of its affiliates reported aggregate beneficial
ownership of 4,676,229 shares of the Corporation as of
December 31, 2009. First Trust Portfolios L.P. and certain
of its affiliates reported that they possessed shared power to
vote or to direct the vote of and shared power to dispose or to
direct the disposition of 4,676,229 shares beneficially
owned. |
|
|
(2)
|
Beneficial
Ownership of Common Stock of Directors, Named Executive Officers
and Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent of
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
Class*
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
872,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
José Menéndez-Cortada, Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
45,896
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry
|
|
|
62,737
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
José Ferrer-Canals
|
|
|
5,527
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
|
|
|
81,677
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro
|
|
|
32,207
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa
|
|
|
4,543,396
|
(4)
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
Frank Kolodziej-Castro
|
|
|
2,762,483
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
%
|
José F. Rodríguez-Perelló
|
|
|
324,077
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Beauchamp-Rodríguez, former President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board(5)
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Orlando Berges-González, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lawrence Odell, Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Randolfo Rivera-Sanfeliz, former Executive Vice President(6)
|
|
|
24,340
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Calixto García-Vélez, Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fernando Scherrer, former Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer(7)
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Current Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(17 persons)
|
|
|
9,394,078
|
|
|
|
10.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of our outstanding Common Stock. |
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of
persons is deemed to have beneficial ownership of a
security if that person has the right to acquire beneficial
ownership of such security within 60 days. Therefore, it
includes the number of shares of Common Stock that could be
purchased by exercising stock |
6
|
|
|
|
|
options that were exercisable as of June 30, 2010 or within
60 days after that date, as follows:
Mr. Alemán-Bermúdez, 672,000; Mr. Odell,
175,000; and 1,221,000 shares for all current directors and
executive officers as a group. Also, it includes shares granted
under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, subject to
transferability restrictions and/or forfeiture upon failure to
meet vesting conditions, as follows:
Mr. Menéndez-Cortada, 2,685;
Mr. Díaz-Irizarry, 2,685; Mr. Ferrer-Canals,
2,685; Ms. Umpierre-Catinchi, 2,685;
Mr. Rodríguez-Amaro, 2,685; Mr. Nevares-LaCosta,
2,685;
Mr. Kolodziej-Castro,
2,685; and Mr. Rodríguez-Perelló, 2,685;
21,480 shares for all current directors and executive
officers as a group. The amount does not include shares of
Common Stock acquired through the Corporations Defined
Contribution Plan pursuant to which participants may acquire
units equivalent to shares of Common Stock through a unitized
stock fund. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount includes 22,460 shares owned separately by his
spouse. |
|
(3) |
|
This amount includes 9,000 shares owned jointly with her
spouse. |
|
(4) |
|
This amount includes 3,941,459 shares owned by
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas father over which he has voting
and investment power as attorney-in-fact. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Beauchamp-Rodríguez resigned as Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation on September 28, 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Rivera-Sanfeliz is no longer an employee of the
Corporation effective as of June 28, 2010. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Scherrer resigned as Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation on July 31, 2009. |
|
|
(3)
|
Beneficial
Ownership of Preferred Stock by Directors and Executive
Officers:
|
The following table sets forth information as of June 30,
2010 with respect to shares of our Preferred Stock beneficially
owned by our directors and executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Percent of
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Title of Securities
|
|
Owned
|
|
Class
|
|
José Menéndez- Cortada
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
73,300
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
82,800
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dacio Pasarell
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of applicable class of Preferred Stock. |
|
(1) |
|
This amount includes 8,000 shares held in a trust for the
benefit of Mr. Nevares-LaCostas parents over which
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta has voting and investment power as
trustee. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount includes 20,000 shares owned by
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas parents over which he has voting
and investment power as attorney-in-fact. |
|
(3) |
|
This amount includes 6,400 shares owned by
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas parents over which he has voting
and investment power as attorney-in-fact. |
José Menéndez-Cortada, Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry,
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta and
Dacio Pasarell have advised us that they will tender all of
their shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer.
7
OVERVIEW
OF PROPOSALS
Background
For the fiscal year ended 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, we
reported losses of approximately $275 million and
$107 million, respectively. These losses were primarily
caused by specific reserves and provisions against our loan
portfolios in Florida and Puerto Rico. The deterioration in the
quality of these assets resulted from the economic recession
being experienced in the United States and in Puerto Rico.
Particularly hard hit by the recession were real estate values
in the two principal markets in which we operate. This adverse
financial downturn diminished the collateral values supporting
many of the loans extended by us in those markets. In turn, this
caused us to increase reserves and, in many cases, charge off
substantial amounts. The downturn in the economy and the
resulting deterioration of our credits increased our
non-performing assets as of March 31, 2010 to approximately
$1.8 billion. We announced in our earnings release issued
on July 27, 2010 that our loss for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 was $90.6 million and our non-performing
assets were $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2010.
As a result of the continuing difficult economic conditions, we
are seeking to improve our capital structure. We have assured
our regulators that we are committed to raising capital and we
have submitted capital plans to our regulators regarding how we
plan to raise capital. The capital plans were submitted in
accordance with a Written Agreement dated June 3, 2010 (the
Agreement) that we entered into with the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York (the Fed) and a Consent
Order dated June 2, 2010 (the Order and
collectively with the Agreement, the Agreements)
that our subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank),
entered into with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
FDIC) and the Commissioner of Financial Institutions
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Pursuant to these
Agreements, the Corporation and FirstBank agreed to take certain
actions designed to improve our financial condition. These
actions include the adoption and implementation of various
plans, procedures and policies related to our capital, lending
activities, liquidity and funds management and strategy. The
Order requires FirstBank to develop and adopt a plan to attain a
leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10% and a Total capital
to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 12%, and obtain
approval prior to issuing, increasing, renewing or rolling over
brokered deposits. The Agreement also requires the Corporation
to obtain the approval of the Fed prior to paying dividends,
receiving dividends from FirstBank, incurring, increasing or
guaranteeing any debt, or purchasing or redeeming any stock, to
comply with certain notice provisions prior to appointing any
new directors or senior executive officers and to comply with
certain restrictions on severance payments and indemnification.
Concurrent with the issuance by the FDIC of its Order, the FDIC
granted FirstBank a temporary waiver through June 30, 2010
to enable it to continue accessing the brokered deposit market.
The FDIC has granted an additional waiver through
September 30, 2010. FirstBank will request waivers for
future periods. No assurance can be given that the FDIC will
continue to issue waivers for amounts that will enable FirstBank
to meet its funding needs. Any failure to obtain a waiver would
have a significantly adverse effect on FirstBank, which has
relied on brokered deposits to fund a major part of its
operations and had, as of March 31, 2010, $7.4 billion
in brokered deposits outstanding, representing approximately 57%
of our total deposits. We announced in our earnings release
issued on July 27, 2010 that our average balance of
brokered CDs decreased to $7.21 billion for the second
quarter of 2010.
We have been taking steps to implement strategies to increase
tangible common equity and regulatory capital through
(1) the Exchange Offer, which is being submitted for
stockholder approval at the Special Meeting, (2) the
issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in one or
more public or private offerings (a Capital Raise),
(3) the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of
Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the
U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred
Stock that we sold to the U.S. Treasury on January 16,
2009, and (4) a rights offering to common stockholders.
With respect to a Capital Raise, we plan to seek to raise at
least $500 million of equity because we believe that amount
would enable us to absorb possible additional losses based on a
worst case evaluation of possible losses over the next five
years while
8
maintaining the capital ratios required for a well-capitalized
financial institution as well as those required by the
FDICs Order. With respect to the conversion, under the
conditions described below, we can compel the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock. See
Agreement with the U.S. Treasury. If we
complete a Capital Raise, we expect to issue rights to the
holders of our currently outstanding 92,542,722 shares of
Common Stock that entitle them to acquire one share of Common
Stock for each share of Common Stock they own at a price equal
to the purchase price in a Capital Raise. No assurance can be
given that we will complete the Exchange Offer, a Capital Raise,
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common
Stock or a rights offering.
We believe that the Exchange Offer and, to the extent completed,
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common
Stock and a Capital Raise would enhance our long-term financial
stability, improve our ability to operate in the current
economic environment, and improve our ability to access the
capital markets in order to fund strategic initiatives or other
business needs and to absorb any future credit losses.
Our inability to complete the Exchange would hinder our efforts
to sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue
to recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a
Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to
comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the
capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans,
which are subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth
our plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in
the Order over time. If, at the end of any quarter, we do not
comply with any specified minimum capital ratios, we must notify
our regulators. The Corporation must notify the Fed within
30 days of the end of any quarter of its inability to
comply with a capital ratio requirement and submit an acceptable
written plan that details the steps it will take to comply with
the requirement. FirstBank must immediately notify the FDIC of
its inability to comply with a capital ratio requirement and,
within 45 days, it must either increase its capital to
comply with the ratio requirements or submit a contingency plan
to the FDIC for its sale, merger, or liquidation. In the event
of a liquidation of FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding
preferred stock would rank senior to the holders of our Common
Stock with respect to rights upon any liquidation of the
Corporation.
The
Exchange Offer for Preferred Stock
On July 16, 2010, we commenced the Exchange Offer. For each
share of Preferred Stock that we accept for exchange in
accordance with the terms of the Exchange Offer, we will issue a
number of shares of our Common Stock having the aggregate dollar
value (based on a price per share determined as described below)
equal to $13.75, which is equal to 55% of the $25 liquidation
preference of a share of Preferred Stock. The price per share
will be based on the greater of the average Volume Weighted
Average Price (or VWAP) during the five
trading-day
period ending on the second business day immediately preceding
the expiration date of the Exchange Offer and the minimum share
price of $1.18. As of July 21, 2010, the market value of a
share of Common Stock was $0.51 and the market prices of a share
of each series of Preferred Stock were as follows: Series A
Preferred Stock - $4.77; Series B Preferred
Stock $4.70; Series C Preferred
Stock $4.77; Series D Preferred Stock - $4.89;
and Series E Preferred Stock $4.65. If the
minimum share price is used to determine the number of shares to
be issued in the Exchange Offer, we will issue
11.6525 shares of Common Stock in exchange for each share
of Preferred Stock. As discussed below under
Required Stockholder Action, completion
of the Exchange Offer is subject to stockholder approval.
Agreement
with the U.S. Treasury
On July 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement with the
U.S. Treasury regarding the exchange of our shares of
Series F Preferred Stock, which has a liquidation
preference of $400 million, and accrued and unpaid
dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock, for shares of a
new series of Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible
Preferred Stock, Series G. Based on accrued and unpaid
dividends of $24.2 million as of July 20, 2010, we
issued 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock to
the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010. Notice was mailed
to our stockholders of record on July 9, 2010 that we
obtained an exception from the shareholder approval policy set
forth in Section 312.03 of the New York Stock Exchange
Listed Company Manual to issue the securities to the
U.S. Treasury.
9
The Series G Preferred Stock has terms similar to the
Series F Preferred Stock (including the same $1,000
liquidation preference per share), but is convertible, under the
conditions discussed below, into shares of Common Stock based on
an initial conversion rate of 896.3045 shares of Common
Stock for each share of Series G Preferred Stock,
calculated by dividing $650, or a discount of 35% from the
$1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series G
Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion price of $0.7252 per
share, which is subject to adjustment. Based on the initial
conversion rate, the 424,174 shares of Series G
Preferred Stock will be convertible into approximately
380.2 million shares of Common Stock. The conversion price
of the Series G Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment,
including if the shares of Common Stock issued in a Capital
Raise are priced below 90% of the market price per share of
Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the
pricing date of such Capital Raise, or if shares of Common Stock
are otherwise issued, except in certain circumstances, including
the Exchange Offer, at a price below the then conversion price
of the Series G Preferred Stock. We can compel conversion
of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock if,
within nine months from the date of the agreement, (a) at
least $385 million of the liquidation preference of our
Series A through E Preferred Stock is tendered in the
Exchange Offer, (b) we raise $500 million of
additional capital, subject to terms, other than the price per
share, reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Treasury in its
sole discretion, (c) we obtain the approval of the holders
of our Common Stock of an amendment to our Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least 1,200,000,000 and to
reduce the par value of a share of Common Stock from $1.00 to
$0.10, (d) we have received from the appropriate banking
regulators all requisite approvals (which we expect to receive),
(e) we have made any applicable anti-dilution adjustments
and (f) none of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries
has dissolved or became subject to insolvency or similar
proceedings, or has become subject to other materially adverse
regulatory or other actions. The U.S. Treasury, and any
subsequent holder of the Series G Preferred Stock, has the
right to convert the Series G Preferred Stock at any time.
Unless earlier converted by the holder or the Corporation, the
Series G Preferred Stock will automatically convert into
shares of Common Stock on the seventh anniversary of the
issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock at the then
current market price of our Common Stock.
At the time we exchanged the Series F Preferred Stock for
Series G Preferred Stock, we issued to the
U.S. Treasury an amended and restated warrant having a
10-year term
and exercisable at an initial exercise price of $0.7252 per
share to replace the original warrant we issued to the
U.S. Treasury when it acquired the Series F Preferred
Stock. Like the original warrant, the amended and restated
warrant has an anti-dilution right that will require an
adjustment to the exercise price of, and the number of shares
underlying, the warrant. This adjustment will be necessary under
various circumstances, including if we issue shares of Common
Stock for consideration per share that is lower than the initial
conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock, or
$0.7252. Depending upon the market price of shares of Preferred
Stock at the time we issue shares of Common Stock in the
Exchange Offer, the amended and restated warrant may require
adjustment to the exercise price of the warrant to equal the
consideration per share received by us in the Exchange Offer and
the number of shares underlying the amended and restated warrant
would be increased by the number obtained by multiplying the
initial number by a fraction equal to the exercise price prior
to the Exchange Offer over the consideration per share we
receive in the Exchange Offer.
The agreement with the U.S. Treasury includes various other
provisions. Included among these provisions are the
U.S. Treasurys agreement to vote, or cause to be
voted, any shares of Common Stock that it acquires pursuant to
the terms of the Series G Preferred Stock or the amended
and restated warrant, except with respect to certain matters, in
the same proportion as the votes of all other outstanding shares
of Common Stock. The U.S. Treasury will retain
discretionary authority to vote on the election and removal of
directors, the approval of any business combination or sale of
substantially all of the assets or property of the Corporation,
the approval of any dissolution of the Corporation, the approval
of any issuance of any securities of the Corporation on which
holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote and on any other
matters reasonably incidental to those matters, as determined by
the U.S. Treasury.
10
Required
Stockholder Action
We cannot complete the Exchange Offer unless our stockholders
approve Proposal No. 1, which seeks approval of the
issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the
Exchange Offer. In addition, we may not be able to complete the
Exchange Offer if our stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 3, which seeks stockholder approval of an
amendment to Article Sixth of the Articles of Incorporation
to decrease the par value of the Corporations Common Stock
from $1.00 to $0.10 per share. The reduction in the par value of
our Common Stock will be necessary to complete the Exchange
Offer if, for example, the market value of a share of Preferred
Stock tendered in the exchange is less than $10 at a time when
the market value of the Common Stock would result in the
issuance of more than 10 shares per tendered share of
Preferred Stock.
We are also requesting stockholder approval of
Proposal Nos. 2 and 4, which relate to the Exchange Offer.
Adoption of these proposals is not a condition to the completion
of the Exchange Offer. If stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 2, which seeks approval of the issuance
of shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta upon his
tender of shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, or
Proposal No. 4, which seeks stockholder approval of
the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS upon its exercise
of the anti-dilution right that it has under the Stockholder
Agreement, we will be unable to issue shares to
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta or BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to such issuances.
We are also requesting stockholder approval of
Proposal No. 5, which relates to the issuance of
shares of Common Stock to BNS upon its exercise of the
anti-dilution right that it has under the Stockholder Agreement
in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the
Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the
U.S. Treasury. If stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 5, we will be unable to issue shares to
BNS as a result of the conversion into Common Stock of the
Series G Preferred Stock in an amount that exceeds 1% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to such issuance.
Finally, we are requesting stockholder approval of
Proposal Nos. 6 and 7, which seek stockholder approval of
amendments to Article Sixth of the Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock and to implement a reverse stock split. If
stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 6, we will
not have enough authorized shares of Common Stock to issue
shares of Common Stock to investors in a Capital Raise for
$500 million and to current stockholders in a rights
offering. If stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 7, we may not be able to bring our Common
Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive
trading days above $1.00, which is a continued listing
requirement of the NYSE. The NYSE will commence suspension and
delisting procedures if we cannot regain compliance with this
requirement by January 9, 2011.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors is seeking stockholder approval of the
issuance of shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of
Preferred Stock. On July 16, 2010, we commenced an offer to
issue 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange
Offer. A special committee of the Board of Directors, comprised
of Fernando
Rodriguez-Amaro
(Chairman), Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, José
Rodriguez-Perello, Frank
Kolodziej-Castro
and José Ferrer-Canals recommended to the full Board the
terms of the Exchange Offer and the Board determined to conduct
the Exchange Offer. None of the members of the special committee
own shares of Preferred Stock.
Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE and, thus, we are subject
to NYSE listing requirements. Under NYSE Listed Company Manual
Section 312.03(c), stockholder approval is required prior
to the issuance of Common Stock, or of securities convertible
into or exercisable for Common Stock, in any transaction or
series of related transactions, other than in certain
circumstances that are inapplicable in this case, if
(1) the Common Stock has, or will have upon issuance,
voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power
outstanding before the issuance of such stock or of securities
convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock or (2) the
number of shares of Common Stock to be issued is, or will be
upon issuance, equal to or in
11
excess of 20% of the number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding before the issuance of the Common Stock or of
securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock.
Because 256,401,610 shares are being offered for issuance
in the exchange, and that issuance would constitute over 20% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to the completion
of the Exchange Offer, we are required to seek stockholder
approval prior to such issuance.
Purpose
of the Exchange Offer
We decided to conduct the Exchange Offer to improve our capital
structure given the continuing difficult economic conditions in
the markets in which we operate and the evolving regulatory
environment. We must increase our common equity to provide
additional protection against future recognition of additional
loan loss reserves against our loan portfolio and credit losses
associated with the disposition of nonperforming assets due to
the current economic situation in Puerto Rico and the United
States that has impacted the Corporations asset quality
and earnings performance. Total non-performing loans to total
loans increased to 12.35% as of March 31, 2010 from 11.23%
as of December 31, 2009 and from 5.27% as of March 31,
2009.
The restructuring of our equity components through the Exchange
Offer will strengthen the quality of our regulatory capital
position and enhance our ability to meet any new capital
requirements. Furthermore, through the Exchange Offer, we are
seeking to improve our common equity to risk weighted assets
ratio. In the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, the SCAP,
applied to large money-center banks in the U.S., federal
regulators established a 4% Tier 1 common equity to risk
weighted assets ratio as the minimum threshold to determine the
potential capital needs of such banks. While the SCAP is not
applicable to us, we believe that the Tier 1 common equity
ratio is being viewed by financial analysts and rating agencies
as a guide for measuring the capital adequacy of banking
institutions. The Exchange Offer will also improve our tangible
common equity to tangible assets ratio, which is another metric
used by financial analysts to determine a banks capital
requirements. As of March 31, 2010, our Tier 1 common
equity ratio was 3.36% and our tangible common equity ratio was
2.74%. If $385 million of the liquidation preference or
approximately 70% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
are exchanged in the Exchange Offer, our Tier 1 common
equity ratio and tangible common equity ratio as of
March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to
the Exchange Offer would have been 6.23% and 4.79%,
respectively. This success rate would meet one of the conditions
necessary for us to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert
into Common Stock the Series G Preferred Stock that we
issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the
Series F Preferred Stock. The other substantive conditions
necessary for us to compel the conversion are our issuance of
$500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other
than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the
U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, and receipt of the
approval by the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment to
our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least
1,200,000,000 and reduce the par value of our Common Stock from
$1.00 to $0.10 per share.
Terms
of the Exchange
We are offering to exchange up to 256,401,610 newly issued
shares of Common Stock for any and all issued and outstanding
shares of Preferred Stock. For each share of Preferred Stock
that we accept for exchange in accordance with the terms of the
exchange offer, we will issue a number of shares of Common Stock
having the Exchange Value set forth in the table below unless
the average VWAP of the Common Stock is $1.18 or less, in which
case we will issue 11.6525 shares of Common Stock for each
share of Preferred Stock.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference
|
|
Preference
|
|
Exchange
|
CUS IP
|
|
Title of Securities
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
per Share
|
|
Value
|
|
|
318672201
|
|
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A
|
|
$
|
90,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672300
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B
|
|
$
|
75,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672409
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series C
|
|
$
|
103,500,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672508
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series D
|
|
$
|
92,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672607
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E
|
|
$
|
189,600,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
Depending on the trading price of our Common Stock, the market
value of the Common Stock we issue on the settlement date in
exchange for each share of Preferred Stock we accept for
exchange may be less than, equal to or greater than the
applicable Exchange Value referred to above. If the trading
price of our Common Stock is below $1.18 per share, the market
value of our Common Stock to be received in the exchange offer
will be less than the applicable Exchange Value.
Consequences
If Stockholders Approve the Proposal
The issuance of our shares of Common Stock in connection with
the Exchange Offer would increase the number of outstanding
shares. As shown in the tables below, the increased number of
shares would reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 and book value per share as of
March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis. In addition, the
issuance of the additional shares would decrease any future
earnings per share and would have a dilutive effect on each
stockholders percentage voting power.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following selected unaudited pro forma financial information
is presented to give effect to and show the pro forma impact of
the Exchange Offer on First BanCorps balance sheet as of
March 31, 2010 and First BanCorps results of
operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 assuming two different
levels of participation in the Exchange Offer as discussed
below. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not
give effect to our issuance of Series G Preferred Stock to
the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily indicate the
financial position or results that would have been realized had
the Exchange Offer been completed as of the dates indicated or
that will be realized in the future when and if the Exchange
Offer is completed. The selected unaudited pro forma financial
information has been derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with First BanCorps historical consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the SEC,
which are included as Exhibits C and D, respectively, to
this Proxy Statement.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Balance Sheets
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet of First
BanCorp as of March 31, 2010 is presented as if the
Exchange Offer had been completed on March 31, 2010. We
have shown the pro forma impact of a High Participation
Scenario and a Low Participation Scenario
prepared using the assumptions set forth below.
13
The High Participation Scenario assumes (i) the
exchange of 90% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
($495.09 million aggregate liquidation preference) for
230,761,449 shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) a
Relevant Price of $1.18 per share.
The Low Participation Scenario assumes (i) the
exchange of 50% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
($275.05 million aggregate liquidation preference) for
128,200,805 shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) a
Relevant Price of $1.18 per share.
If the Relevant Price is greater than the $1.18 per share amount
assumed in the preceding paragraphs, there will be a decrease in
the number of shares of Common Stock being issued and an
increase in surplus, and increase in earnings per share relative
to the pro forma financial statement information.
There can be no assurance that the foregoing assumptions will be
realized in the future.
14
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
High
Participation Scenario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
675,551
|
|
|
$
|
(6,876
|
)(5)
|
|
$
|
668,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
Due from customers on acceptances
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts receivable from investment sales
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,844,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Reserve
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
Bank acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
(495,090
|
)(1)
|
|
|
434,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
(2)
|
|
|
333,201
|
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
|
|
|
323,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,247
|
|
|
|
46,375
|
(3)
|
|
|
180,622
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
211,078
|
(4)
|
|
|
221,218
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
|
1,481,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,844,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value per common share(6)
|
|
$
|
6.04
|
|
|
$
|
(2.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.24
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(7)
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.10
|
|
15
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes Exchange Offer participation at 90% with a ratio of
Exchange Value to liquidation preference equal to 55%. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the issuance of Common Stock at par value of $1.00. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the additional paid in capital with respect to newly
issued Common Stock, net of exchange costs and adjusted for the
issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the excess of the Preferred Stock carrying value,
reduced by the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged,
over the value of the Common Stock to be issued on the Exchange
Offer considering the assumptions described in note 1 above. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the costs associated with this Exchange Offer
calculated on a pro-rata basis according to the number of shares
exchanged. The amount was reduced from additional paid in
capital. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced book value per
common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.48. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced tangible book
value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.01. |
16
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
Low
Participation Scenario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
675,551
|
|
|
$
|
(4,126
|
)(5)
|
|
$
|
671,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
Due from customers on acceptances
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts receivable from investment sales
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,846,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Reserve
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
Bank acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
(275,050
|
)(1)
|
|
|
654,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
(2)
|
|
|
230,641
|
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
|
|
|
220,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,247
|
|
|
|
25,458
|
(3)
|
|
|
159,705
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
117,265
|
(4)
|
|
|
127,405
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
|
1,484,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,846,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share(6)
|
|
$
|
6.04
|
|
|
$
|
(2.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(7)
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes Exchange Offer participation at 50% with a ratio of
Exchange Value to liquidation preference equal to 55%. |
(2) |
|
Represents the issuance of Common Stock at par value of $1.00. |
(3) |
|
Represents the additional paid in capital with respect to newly
issued Common Stock, net of exchange costs and adjusted for the
issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged. |
17
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents the excess of the Preferred Stock carrying value,
reduced by the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged,
over the value of Common Stock to be issued on the Exchange
Offer considering the assumptions described in note 1 above. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the costs associated with this Exchange offer
calculated on a pro rata basis according to the number of shares
exchanged. The amount was reduced from additional paid in
capital. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced book value per
common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.48. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced tangible book
value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.01. |
Pro
Forma Earnings Implications
The following presents the pro forma impact of the Exchange
Offer on certain statement of operations items and losses per
share of Common Stock for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
and the year ended December 31, 2009 as if the Exchange
Offer had been completed on January 1, 2009. We have
calculated the pro forma information below by
(1) eliminating all the actual dividends in 2009 paid to
holders of shares of Preferred Stock who participate at the
levels assumed in each of the High Participation Scenario and
the Low Participation Scenario, and (2) assuming that the
new shares of our Common Stock issuable in the Exchange Offer
were issued on January 1, 2009 and received dividends
through August 2009. The retained earnings impact of the
Exchange Offer has not been included in the analysis because it
is not recurring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Implications
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
|
Q1 2010
|
|
|
Q1 2010
|
|
|
Q1 2010
|
|
|
FY 09
|
|
|
FY 09
|
|
|
FY 09
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss)after provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to preferred stockholders(a)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
42,661
|
|
|
|
21,516
|
|
|
|
30,914
|
|
Preferred stock discount accretion
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) attributable to common stockholders(b)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
(300,930
|
)
|
|
|
(310,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net (loss)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
46,888
|
|
|
|
25,743
|
|
|
|
35,141
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
(300,930
|
)
|
|
|
(310,328
|
)
|
Common shares used to calculate actual (loss) per common share
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
Common shares newly issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,282
|
|
|
|
220,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,272
|
|
|
|
220,712
|
|
Pro forma losses per common share (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.41
|
)
|
18
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009, reflects Series F Preferred Stock
cumulative preferred dividends of $5.0 million and
$12.6 million, respectively, not declared as of the end of
the period related to the Series |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced net loss
attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 of $96.8 million. |
Consequences
If Stockholders Do Not Approve the Proposal
We will not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if our
stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 1.
Further, we may not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if
stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 3, relating
to the amendment of our Articles of Incorporation to reduce the
par value of a share of our Common Stock, if this is necessary
so that we can issue shares of Common Stock in exchange for
tendered Preferred Stock. Our inability to complete the Exchange
Offer would hinder our efforts to sell Common Stock in a Capital
Raise. If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves
and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and
FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital
requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the
approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the
capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. If,
at the end of any quarter, we do not comply with any specified
minimum capital ratios, we must notify our regulators. The
Corporation must notify the Fed within 30 days of the end
of any quarter of its inability to comply with a capital ratio
requirement and submit an acceptable written plan that details
the steps it will take to comply with the requirement. FirstBank
must immediately notify the FDIC of its inability to comply with
a capital ratio requirement and, within 45 days, it must
either increase its capital to comply with the ratio
requirements or submit a contingency plan to the FDIC for its
sale, merger, or liquidation. In the event of a liquidation of
FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding preferred stock would
rank senior to the holders of our Common Stock with respect to
rights upon any liquidation of the Corporation. Finally, if we
cannot complete the Exchange Offer and issue Common Stock in
exchange for $385 million of liquidation preference of
Preferred Stock, we will not be able to compel the exchange into
Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock we issued to
the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010, even if we are
able to complete a Capital Raise for $500 million, which is
another condition to our ability to compel the conversion.
Description
and Comparison of Preferred Stock, Series G Preferred Stock
and Common Stock Rights
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of
750,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 per
share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share. The following summary outlines the rights of
holders of the shares of Preferred Stock, the holder of
Series G Preferred Stock and the holders of the Common
Stock to be issued in the exchange offer. This summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to our Articles of
Incorporation, including the Certificates of Designation, and
our by-laws (the Bylaws). We urge you to read these
documents for a more complete understanding of the differences
between the shares of Preferred Stock and the Common Stock. We
issued shares of a new series of Series G Preferred Stock
to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for Series F
Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends on such stock.
The Series G Preferred Stock has terms similar to the
Series F Preferred Stock but is convertible as described
below.
Governing
Documents
Shares of Preferred Stock: Holders of shares
of Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock have the
rights set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, including the
applicable Certificate of Designation, the Bylaws and Puerto
Rico law.
Common Stock: Holders of shares of our Common
Stock have the rights set forth in our Articles of
Incorporation, the Bylaws and Puerto Rico law.
19
Dividends
and Distributions
On July 30, 2009, we announced the suspension of dividends
on our Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred
Stock (which has been exchanged for Series G Preferred
Stock) effective with the preferred dividend for August 2009. We
are generally not obligated or required to pay dividends on our
Common Stock or preferred stock and no such dividends can be
paid unless they are declared by our board of directors out of
funds legally available for payment. Moreover, the Agreement we
entered with the Fed requires us to obtain its approval before
we pay any dividends.
Shares of Preferred Stock: The shares of
Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock, rank
senior to the Common Stock and any other stock that is expressly
junior to Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock as
to payment of dividends. Dividends on shares of Preferred Stock
are payable monthly and are not mandatory or cumulative. Shares
of Series G Preferred Stock pay cumulative compounding
dividends quarterly in arrears of 5% per year until the fifth
anniversary of the issuance of Series F Preferred Stock,
and 9% thereafter. Holders of shares of Preferred Stock are
entitled to receive dividends, when, as, and if declared by our
Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for dividends.
Common Stock: Subject to the preferential
rights of any other class or series of capital stock, including
Preferred Stock, holders of our Common Stock are entitled to
receive, pro rata, dividends when and as declared by our Board
of Directors out of funds legally available for the payment of
dividends. In general, so long as any shares of Preferred Stock
remain outstanding and until we meet various federal regulatory
considerations, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any
dividends on shares of our Common Stock unless all accrued and
unpaid dividends on our Preferred Stock for the twelve monthly
dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend
payment date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and
the full monthly dividend on our Preferred Stock for the then
current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid
or declared and set apart for payment. In addition, in general,
and subject to certain limitations in the applicable certificate
of designation, so long as any shares of Series G Preferred
Stock remain outstanding, we cannot declare, set apart or pay
any dividends on shares of our Common Stock unless all accrued
and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods, including
the latest completed dividend period, on all outstanding shares
of Series G Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in
full.
Ranking
Shares of Preferred Stock: Each series of
Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock,
currently ranks senior to the Common Stock with respect to
dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of First BanCorp. Each series of Preferred Stock, as well as
Series G Preferred Stock, is equal in right of payment with
the other outstanding series of shares of preferred stock. The
liquidation preference of the shares of Preferred Stock is $25
per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon for the
current monthly dividend period to the date of distribution. The
liquidation preference of shares of Series G Preferred
Stock is $1,000 per share, plus the amount of any accrued and
unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, to the date of
payment.
Common Stock: The Common Stock ranks junior
with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or
winding-up
of First BanCorp to all other securities and indebtedness of
First BanCorp.
Conversion
Rights
None of the shares of Preferred Stock, or Common Stock are
convertible into other securities. The Series G Preferred
Stock is convertible under the conditions described below, into
shares of Common Stock based on an initial conversion rate of
896.3045 shares of Common Stock for each share of
Series G Preferred Stock, calculated by dividing $650, or a
discount of 35% from the $1,000 liquidation preference per share
of Series G Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion
price of $0.7252 per share, which is subject to adjustment.
Based on the initial conversion rate, the 424,174 shares of
Series G Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury
will be convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares
of Common Stock. The conversion price of the Series G
Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment, including if the
shares of Common Stock issued in a Capital
20
Raise are priced below 90% of the market price per share of
Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the
pricing date of such Capital Raise, or if shares of Common Stock
are otherwise issued, except in certain circumstances, including
the Exchange Offer, at a price below the then conversion price
of the Series G Preferred Stock. We can compel conversion
of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock if,
within nine months from the date of the agreement with the
U.S. Treasury, (a) at least $385 million of the
liquidation preference of our Series A through E Preferred
Stock is tendered in the Exchange Offer, (b) we raise
$500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other
than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the
U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, (c) we obtain
the approval of the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment
to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least
1,200,000,000 and to reduce the par value of a share of Common
Stock from $1.00 to $0.10, (d) we have received from the
appropriate banking regulators all requisite approvals (which we
expect to receive), (e) we have made any applicable
anti-dilution adjustments, and (f) none of the Corporation
or any of its subsidiaries has dissolved or became subject to
insolvency or similar proceedings, or has become subject to
other materially adverse regulatory or other actions. The
U.S. Treasury, and any subsequent holder of the
Series G Preferred Stock, has the right to convert the
Series G Preferred Stock at any time. Unless earlier
converted by the holder or the Corporation, the Series G
Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of Common
Stock on the seventh anniversary of the issuance of the
Series G Preferred Stock at the then current market price
of our Common Stock.
Voting
Rights
Shares of Preferred Stock: Whenever dividends
remain unpaid on the shares of preferred stock or any other
class or series of preferred stock that ranks on parity with
shares of preferred stock as to payment of dividends and having
equivalent voting rights, the Parity Stock, for at least
18 monthly dividend periods (whether or not consecutive),
the number of directors constituting our Board of Directors will
be increased by two members and the holders of the shares of
preferred stock together with holders of Parity Stock, voting
separately as a single class, will have the right to elect the
two additional members of our board of directors. When First
BanCorp has paid full dividends on any class or series of
noncumulative Parity Stock for at least 12 consecutive monthly
dividend periods following such nonpayment, and has paid
cumulative dividends in full on any class or series of
cumulative Parity Stock, the voting rights will cease and the
authorized number of directors will be reduced by two. Holders
of shares of Preferred Stock currently have the right to vote as
a separate class with all other series of Parity Stock adversely
affected by and entitled to vote thereon (except Series G
Preferred Stock, which votes as a separate class), with respect
to:
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment, alteration or repeal of the provisions of the
Articles of Incorporation, including the relevant Certificates
of Designation, or Bylaws that would alter or change the voting
powers, preferences or special rights of such series of shares
of Preferred Stock so as to affect them adversely; or
|
|
|
|
any amendment or alteration of the Articles of Incorporation to
authorize or increase the authorized amount of any shares of, or
any securities convertible into shares of, any of First
BanCorps capital stock ranking senior to such series of
shares of Preferred Stock.
|
Approval of two-thirds of such shares is required.
So long as any shares of Series G Preferred Stock are
outstanding, in addition to the voting rights set forth above,
the vote or consent of the holders of at least of two-thirds of
the shares of Series G Preferred Stock at the time
outstanding, voting separately as a single class, shall be
necessary for effecting or validating any consummation of a
binding share exchange or reclassification involving
Series G Preferred Stock or of a merger or consolidation of
First BanCorp with another entity, unless the shares of
Series G Preferred Stock remain outstanding following any
such transaction or, if First BanCorp is not the surviving
entity, are converted into or exchanged for preference
securities and such remaining outstanding shares of
Series G Preferred Stock or preference securities have
rights, references, privileges and voting powers that are not
materially less favorable than the rights, preferences,
privileges or voting powers of Series G Preferred Stock,
taken as a whole.
21
Common Stock: Holders of shares of our Common
Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on
by our stockholders. There are no cumulative voting rights for
the election of directors.
Common
Stock
We have no obligation or right to redeem our Common Stock.
Redemption
Preferred Stock: Optional Redemption by First
BanCorp. We may redeem all or a portion of
each series of shares of Preferred Stock, at our option on or
after the date set forth in the table below at the redemption
prices set forth below, on any dividend payment date for which
dividends have been declared in full.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
|
CUSIP
|
|
Title of Securities Represented by Shares of Preferred
Stock
|
|
Redemption Period
|
|
Share
|
|
|
318672201
|
|
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A
|
|
April 30, 2006
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672300
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B
|
|
October 31, 2007
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672409
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series C
|
|
June 30, 2008
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672508
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series D
|
|
January 31, 2009
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672607
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E
|
|
September 30, 2009
to September 29, 2010
|
|
|
$25.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series G
|
|
See below.
|
|
|
See below.
|
|
Series G Preferred Stock may not be redeemed prior to
January 16, 2012 unless we have received aggregate gross
proceeds from one or more Qualified Equity Offerings (as defined
below) of at least $100 million. In such a case, we may
redeem Series G Preferred Stock, subject to the approval of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole
or in part, up to a maximum amount equal to the aggregate net
cash proceeds received by us from such qualified equity
offerings. A Qualified Equity Offering is a sale and
issuance for cash by us, to persons other than the Corporation
or its subsidiaries after January 16, 2009, of shares of
perpetual Preferred Stock, Common Stock or a combination
thereof, that in each case qualify as Tier 1 capital of the
Corporation at the time of issuance under the applicable
risk-based capital guidelines. Qualified Equity Offerings do not
include issuances made in connection with agreements or
arrangements entered into, or pursuant to financing plans that
were publicly announced, on or prior to October 13, 2008.
After January 16, 2012, Series G Preferred Stock may be
redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to
time, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. In any redemption of Series G
Preferred Stock, the redemption price is an amount equal to the
per-share liquidation amount plus accrued and unpaid dividends
to but excluding the date of redemption.
Redemption at Option of Holder. The shares of
Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock are not
redeemable at the option of the holders.
Common Stock: We have no obligation or right
to redeem our Common Stock.
Listing
Shares of Preferred Stock: Each series of
Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE. However, we intend to
delist each series of Preferred Stock from the NYSE after
completion of the Exchange Offer and we do not intend to apply
for listing of any series of shares of Preferred Stock on any
other securities exchange. To the extent permitted by law, we
intend to deregister each outstanding series of Preferred Stock
under the Exchange
22
Act after delisting each such series from the NYSE.
Series G Preferred Stock is not listed on a national
securities exchange. If requested by the U.S. Treasury, we
are required to list, and maintain such listing, of the
Series G Preferred Stock and the amended warrant on the
NYSE or a different national stock exchange, to the extent such
securities comply with applicable listing requirements.
Common Stock: The Common Stock is listed for
trading on the NYSE.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 1.
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 1 to issue 256,401,610
newly issued shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of
Preferred Stock requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the
total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against,
represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock
outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
counted in determining the number of votes cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE BECAUSE
IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF STOCKHOLDERS.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER TO DIRECTOR
HÉCTOR M. NEVARES-LACOSTA
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the
issuance of shares of Common Stock to
Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta
in connection with his participation in the Exchange Offer.
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of our Board of Directors,
currently beneficially owns 196,100 shares of Preferred
Stock. If stockholders approve Proposal No. 1 and this
Proposal No. 2, we will issue shares of Common Stock
to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta in the Exchange Offer based on the
same terms as those offered to other holders of Preferred Stock
in the Exchange Offer. Mr. Nevares-LaCosta has advised us
that, if Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are approved, he will tender
all of his shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer.
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b),
stockholder approval is required prior to the issuance of Common
Stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for Common
Stock, in any transaction or series of related transactions with
a director or officer if the number of shares of Common
Stock to be issued, or if the number of shares of Common Stock
into which the securities may be convertible or exercisable,
exceeds either one percent of the number of shares of Common
Stock or one percent of the voting power outstanding before the
issuance. Subject to stockholder approval of this
Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 1 relating
to the Exchange Offer itself, upon
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas tender of shares of Preferred
Stock in the Exchange Offer, we will issue shares of Common
Stock to him based on the same terms as those offered to other
participants in the Exchange Offer, which amount may exceed 1%
of shares of outstanding Common Stock prior to the Exchange
Offer depending upon the number of shares of Preferred Stock he
tenders and the number of shares tendered by other participants.
Accordingly, we are seeking stockholder approval of the issuance
of such shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. The issuance of our shares of Common
Stock in connection with the Exchange Offer to
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would increase the number of
outstanding shares. An increased number of shares would
23
reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 on a pro forma basis, would decrease any future earnings
per share and would have a dilutive effect on each
stockholders percentage voting power.
The following table summarizes (1) the total number of
shares that would be issued and outstanding assuming
Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are approved and all of the offered
shares are issued in the Exchange Offer, (2) the total
number of shares of Common Stock Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would
beneficially own if he tenders all of his shares of Preferred
Stock, and (3) the resulting percentage of outstanding
shares that Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would beneficially own if
we issue all of the shares offered in the Exchange Offer.
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding
|
|
Common Stock to be Owned by
|
|
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas
|
if All Shares Offered in the
|
|
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta after
|
|
Percentage Ownership after
|
Exchange Offer are Issued
|
|
Tender of All Shares
|
|
Tender of All Shares
|
|
348,944,332
|
|
6,828,451
|
|
1.96%(a)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This percentage will decrease if (i) the Series G
Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock, (ii) we
sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise or (iii) BNS acquires
shares of Common Stock to maintain its percentage interest after
the Exchange Offer, the conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise. |
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve this Proposal, we will be unable
to exchange Mr. Nevares-LaCostas tendered shares of
Preferred Stock for Common Stock.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 2.
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 2 to exchange
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas shares of Preferred Stock for
shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast
on such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the
proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of
the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes
cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER TO MR.
NEVARES-LACOSTA.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF OUR RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO DECREASE OUR COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE
Overview
and Reason for the Amendment
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted a
resolution to amend our Articles of Incorporation to decrease
the par value of our shares of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10
per share if necessary to complete the Exchange Offer. Adoption
of this amendment will be necessary to complete the Exchange
Offer if, for example, the market value of a share of Preferred
Stock tendered in the exchange is less than $10 at a time when
the market value of the Common Stock would result in the
issuance of more than 10 shares of Common Stock per
tendered share of Preferred Stock. Under Puerto Rico law, shares
of Common Stock, other than Treasury shares, cannot be sold for
a price equal to less than the par value of the stock. In
addition, adoption of this amendment is one of the conditions
that must be satisfied for us to compel the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock.
24
In accordance with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an
amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par
value of our Common Stock requires stockholder approval.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
If stockholders approve this proposal, the Board of Directors
currently intends to file, with the Secretary of Puerto Rico,
the Articles of Incorporation reflecting such amendment as soon
as practicable following stockholders approval. This amendment,
if adopted, will not change or affect the number of shares of
Common Stock held by any stockholder. The change in par value
will cause technical changes on our balance sheet as to the
amounts shown as Common Stock and additional
paid-in capital.
If approved, the amendment would amend and restate
Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation. The text of
the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is
attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. The proposed
amendment also reflects an increase in the number of authorized
shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 shares to
2,000,000,000 shares, as discussed in
Proposal No. 6 below.
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve the proposal to reduce the par
value of the Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share and the
decrease in the par value of the Common Stock is necessary to
complete the Exchange Offer, such as, because the market value
of a share of Preferred Stock tendered in the Exchange Offer is
less than $10 at a time when the market value of the Common
Stock would result in the issuance of more than 10 shares
of Common Stock for a share of Preferred Stock, we will not be
able to complete the Exchange Offer. In addition, if
stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not meet one
of the conditions necessary for us to compel the conversion into
Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock that we issued
to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock on July 20, 2010. Finally, our inability to
complete the Exchange Offer would hinder our efforts to sell
Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue to
recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a Capital
Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply
with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital
plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which are
subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to
attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order
over time. See Overview of the Proposals
Background for further discussion of consequences if we
are unable to complete the Exchange Offer.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our
Common Stock.
Required
Vote
Approval of Proposal No. 3 to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock from
$1.00 to $0.10 requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against
this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO DECREASE THE PAR VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK FROM
$1.00 TO $0.10 PER SHARE.
25
PROPOSAL NO. 4
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA IN
CONNECTION WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the
issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock to BNS
if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement in connection with the Exchange Offer.
In connection with our sale in 2007 of 9,250,450 shares of
Common Stock, or approximately 10%, to BNS at a price of $10.25
per share, we and BNS entered into the Stockholder Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, for as long
as BNS beneficially owns at least 5% of our outstanding Common
Stock, BNS has a right of first refusal, which does not apply to
our issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer,
and an anti-dilution right. If we complete the Exchange Offer,
BNS would be entitled to acquire up to the number of shares of
our Common Stock that would enable it to maintain its percentage
interest in the Corporation after we consummate the transaction.
BNSs anti-dilution right entitles it to pay a price equal
to the price per share at which the shares of our Common Stock
were issued in the transaction. If BNS declines to exercise its
anti-dilution right, BNSs beneficial ownership would be
reduced by the issuance of the additional shares.
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), any
sale of additional shares of Common Stock to BNS in an amount
that exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock
requires the prior approval of our stockholders under the
listing requirements of the NYSE unless the sale is at a price
in cash at least as great as the higher of the book or market
value of Common Stock, provided that the number of shares to be
issued does not exceed 5% of the number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding before the issuance. Since BNSs
anti-dilution right permits it to acquire more than 5% of the
number of shares of common Stock outstanding before the issuance
to BNS, stockholder approval is required.
Pursuant to the Federal Reserves Order approving
BNSs acquisition of our Common Stock in 2007, BNS is
required to file an application and receive the Federal
Reserves approval before it may directly or indirectly
acquire additional shares of our Common Stock or attempt to
exercise a controlling influence over First BanCorp. As a
result, if BNS desires to exercise its anti-dilution right in
connection with the Exchange Offer, BNS will be required to
obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. The issuance of our shares of Common
Stock to BNS would increase the number of outstanding shares. An
increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis,
would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a
dilutive effect on each stockholders percentage voting
power. Thus, current stockholders interests in the
Corporation would be diluted while BNS would be able to maintain
its ownership percentage.
The following table summarizes (1) the maximum number of
shares that will be outstanding if Proposal Nos. 1 and 4
are approved, we issue all of the offered shares in the Exchange
Offer, and BNS exercises its anti-dilution right in full,
(2) the total number of shares of Common Stock that BNS
will own if it fully exercises its anti-dilution right, and
(3) BNSs percentage ownership assuming the maximum
number of shares of Common Stock are issued in the Exchange
Offer and to BNS. This table does not include the shares of
Common Stock that are issuable upon conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock, that may be issued in a Capital
Raise or that may be acquired by BNS pursuant to its
anti-dilution right in connection with the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding if
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
All Shares Offered in the Exchange Offer
|
|
Common Stock to be Owned by
|
|
BNSs Percentage Ownership
|
are Issued and BNS Acquires
|
|
BNS Upon Acquisition of
|
|
Upon Acquisition of
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
377,420,453
|
|
37,726,571
|
|
9.9959%
|
26
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If BNS exercises its anti-dilution right and stockholders do not
approve the issuance of such shares, we will not issue shares to
BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the shares of Common Stock
outstanding prior to the issuance, notwithstanding the terms of
the Stockholder Agreement. This may constitute a breach of the
Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other
relief against us.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 4.
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 4 to issue shares of
Common Stock to BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in
connection with the Exchange Offer requires the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal,
provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for
or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common
Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
counted in determining the number of votes cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BNS PURSUANT TO BNSS
ANTI-DILUTION RIGHT UNDER THE STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT IN
CONNECTION WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER.
PROPOSAL NO. 5
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SERIES G PREFERRED
STOCK
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the
issuance of up to 42,224,017 shares of Common Stock to BNS
if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of
the shares of Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to
the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock or such higher number of shares of Common Stock
determined as a result of the impact of any adjustment to the
conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock. The
42,224,017 shares is based on the current conversion price
of the Series G.
As noted in Proposal No. 4, pursuant to the terms of
the Stockholder Agreement, for as long as BNS beneficially owns
at least 5% of our outstanding Common Stock, BNS has a right of
first refusal, which does not apply to our issuance of the
Series G Preferred Stock or the shares of Common Stock upon
conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, and an
anti-dilution right. We have been discussing with BNS an
amendment to the Stockholder Agreement pursuant to which BNS
would have the ability to decide whether to exercise its
anti-dilution right after we have issued shares of Common Stock
in the Exchange Offer, any Capital Raise and the conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock rather than in connection with
the issuance of shares of Common Stock in each of those
transactions. If BNS agrees, its anti-dilution right will
entitle it to acquire as a result of the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock up to the number of shares of our
Common Stock that would enable it to maintain its percentage
interest in the Corporation after the conversion at a price
equal to the price per share at which the Series G
Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock. If BNS declines
to exercise its anti-dilution right, BNSs beneficial
ownership would be reduced by the issuance of the additional
shares.
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), any
sale of additional shares of Common Stock or securities
convertible into Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds
1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock requires the prior
approval of our stockholders under the listing requirements of
the NYSE unless the sale is at a price in cash at least as great
as the higher of the book or market value of Common
27
Stock, provided that the number of shares to be issued does not
exceed 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
before the issuance. Since BNSs anti-dilution right
permits it to acquire more than 5% of the number of shares of
common Stock outstanding before the issuance of shares to BNS,
stockholder approval is required.
Pursuant to the Federal Reserves Order approving
BNSs acquisition of our Common Stock in 2007, BNS is
required to file an application and receive the Federal
Reserves approval before it may directly or indirectly
acquire additional shares of our Common Stock or attempt to
exercise a controlling influence over First BanCorp. As a
result, if BNS desires to exercise its anti-dilution right and
purchase additional shares of our Common Stock, BNS will be
required to obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. The issuance of our shares of Common
Stock upon conversion of Series G Preferred Stock issued to
BNS would increase the number of outstanding shares. An
increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis,
would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a
dilutive effect on each stockholders percentage voting
power. Thus, while BNS would be able to maintain its ownership
percentage, other stockholders interests in the
Corporation would be diluted.
The following table summarizes (1) the maximum number of
shares that will be outstanding if Proposal Nos. 1, 4, and
5 are approved, we issue all of the offered shares of Common
Stock in the Exchange Offer, we issue shares of Common Stock to
the U.S. Treasury in the conversion, and BNS exercises its
anti-dilution right in full, (2) the total number of shares
of Common Stock that BNS will own if it fully exercises its
anti-dilution right in connection with the Exchange Offer and
the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock, and
(3) BNSs percentage ownership assuming
636,590,675 shares of Common Stock are issued in the
Exchange Offer and the conversion of Series G Preferred
Stock and BNS fully exercises its anti-dilution rights. This
table does not reflect the issuance of shares in a Capital Raise
even though the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock
by the Corporation requires the issuance of $500 million of
equity in a Capital Raise. BNS has waived its right of first
refusal in connection with a Capital Raise but will have an
anti-dilution right in connection with a Capital Raise. This
table also does not reflect the issuance of shares to BNS as a
result of its exercise of its anti-dilution right in connection
with a Capital Raise. Completion of such a Capital Raise may
require stockholder approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
if All Shares Offered in the Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
Offer and the Conversion are
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Issued and BNS Acquires the
|
|
Common Stock to be Owned by
|
|
BNSs Percentage Ownership
|
Maximum Number of Shares to
|
|
BNS Upon Acquisition of
|
|
Upon Acquisition of
|
Maintain its Percentage Interest
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
|
799,833,535
|
|
|
|
79,950,588
|
|
|
|
9.9959
|
%
|
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If BNS exercises its anti-dilution right and stockholders do not
approve the issuance of such shares, we will not issue shares of
Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the shares
outstanding prior to the issuance, notwithstanding the terms of
the Stockholder Agreement. This may constitute a breach of the
Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other
relief against us.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 5.
28
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 5 to issue shares of
Series G Preferred Stock convertible into Common Stock to
BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in connection with the
conversion of Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast
on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of
all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number
of votes cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK TO BNS PURSUANT TO BNSS ANTI-DILUTION
RIGHT UNDER THE STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ISSUANCE OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK.
PROPOSAL NO. 6
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED
SHARES OF OUR
COMMON STOCK
Overview
and Reasons for the Amendment
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted
resolutions approving and authorizing an amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of our Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 and
directing that the amendment be submitted to a vote of the
stockholders at the Special Meeting. In accordance with Puerto
Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to our Articles
of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of our Common
Stock or Preferred Stock requires stockholder approval.
The Board of Directors determined that the amendment is in the
best interests of First BanCorp and its stockholders. If the
proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, the Board of
Directors currently intends to file, with the Puerto Rico
Department of State, the Articles of Incorporation reflecting
such amendment as soon as practicable following stockholder
approval. Attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement is the proposed amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation. (The amendment included as Exhibit A also
reflects the proposed amendment to decrease the par value of a
share of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share.)
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 27, 2010,
our stockholders approved the increase in our authorized shares
of Common Stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000. Since then, we
have commenced the Exchange Offer to issue
256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in exchange for our
outstanding Preferred Stock and issued shares of Series G
Preferred Stock in exchange for Series F Preferred Stock.
In addition, we plan to seek to raise $500 million in a
Capital Raise. Finally, we expect to offer to our current
stockholders the opportunity to buy one share of Common Stock
for each share of Common Stock they own at the purchase price
set forth in a Capital Raise. In our prospectus for the Exchange
Offer, we disclosed that we estimated that we would issue an
additional 1.43 billion shares after the completion of the
Exchange Offer as a result of conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock, the Capital Raise and the issuance of shares to
BNS. This estimate was based on a sale in a Capital Raise of
$500 million at an assumed per-share price of $0.57, the
market price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010, and a
sale to BNS of the maximum number of shares it could buy upon
exercise of its anti-dilution right. No assurance can be given
as to the price at which shares would be sold in any Capital
Raise or whether any such Capital Raise can be completed. Since
we had 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
July 22, 2010, we do not have enough shares of Common Stock
authorized for issuance to complete the above transactions.
Accordingly, our Board of Directors has proposed this increase
to enable us to complete the transactions described above.
29
Our Articles of Incorporation currently authorize the issuance
of up to 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock and
50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. If adopted, the
proposed amendment will not result in an increase in the number
of authorized shares of Preferred Stock.
Of the 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock currently
authorized, as of the close of business on the Record Date,
there were 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock issued and
outstanding. Furthermore, we have reserved for future issuance
or are currently offering to issue:
a) 380,189,051 shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock,
based on the initial conversion price;
b) 5,842,259 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise
of an outstanding warrant held by the U.S. Treasury;
c) 2,073,200 shares of Common Stock subject to
outstanding options under the 1997 Stock Option Plan;
d) 3,767,784 shares of Common Stock for issuance under
the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
e) subject to the approval of our stockholders,
(i) 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange
Offer, (ii) assuming the issuance of all of the offered
shares in the Exchange Offer and subject to the approval of our
stockholders, 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock for
issuance to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right, and
(iii) assuming the issuance of 380,189,065 shares of
Common Stock in exchange for Series G Preferred Stock that
we issued to the U.S. Treasury, and subject to the approval
of our stockholders, 42,224,017 shares of Common Stock for
issuance to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. As is the case with the current
authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, the additional
shares of Common Stock authorized by this proposed amendment
could be issued upon approval by our Board of Directors without
further vote of our stockholders except as may be required in
particular cases by our Articles of Incorporation, applicable
law, regulatory agencies or the NYSE. Under our Articles of
Incorporation, stockholders do not have preemptive rights to
subscribe to additional securities that we issue, which means
that current stockholders do not have a prior right to purchase
any new issue of Common Stock in order to maintain their
proportionate ownership interest in the Corporation. If we issue
additional shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into
or exercisable for Common Stock, such issuances would have a
dilutive effect on the voting power and would reduce loss per
share and any future earnings per share of our currently
outstanding shares of Common Stock. We will not need stockholder
approval of a Capital Raise in the form of a public offering.
The following table sets forth the total number of
(1) authorized shares of our Common Stock as of
July 22, 2010, (2) outstanding shares of our Common
Stock as of July 22, 2010, (3) reserved shares of our
Common Stock, including pursuant to the Exchange Offer and the
conversion of Series G Preferred Stock but excluding shares
issuable to BNS upon its exercise of its anti-dilution right,
(4) shares of our Common Stock available for issuance,
which excludes the reserved shares, (5) proposed authorized
shares, subject to stockholder approval pursuant to this
Proposal 6 and (6) Common Stock available for issuance
if this Proposal 6 is approved by the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently
|
|
Currently
|
|
Shares Currently
|
|
Shares Currently
|
|
Proposed
|
|
Shares Potentially
|
Authorized
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Reserved for
|
|
Available for
|
|
Authorized
|
|
Available for
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuance
|
|
750,000,000
|
|
92,542,722
|
|
648,273,918
|
|
9,183,360
|
|
2,000,000,000
|
|
1,259,183,360
|
The number of shares potentially available for issuance if
stockholders approve this Proposal would enable us to issue
shares in a Capital Raise, if we can complete such a Capital
Raise and obtain any required stockholder approval. This would
enable us to convert the Series G Preferred Stock as long
as we satisfy the
30
other conditions to such conversion. In addition, we believe
that we would have enough shares to conduct a rights offering.
Anti-takeover Effects. Under certain
circumstances, the proposed amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation could have an anti-takeover effect. The proposed
increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock may
discourage or make more difficult a change in control of the
Corporation. For example, we could issue additional shares to
dilute the voting power of, create voting impediments for, or
otherwise frustrate the efforts of persons seeking to take over
or gain control of the Corporation, whether or not the change in
control is favored by a majority of our unaffiliated
stockholders. We could also privately place shares of Common
Stock with purchasers who would side with our Board of Directors
in opposing a hostile takeover bid, except that we would need
stockholder approval of any such private sales that exceed 20%
of the outstanding shares prior to the sale. Except for the
possible acquisition of approximately 21% of Common Stock by the
U.S. Treasury if we are able to compel the conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock, assuming we
issue approximately 1.68 billion shares in the Exchange
Offer, in a Capital Raise and to BNS at the market price of our
Common Stock on July 14, 2010 of $0.57, the Board of
Directors is not aware of any plans for or attempt to effect a
change in control of the Corporation.
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not be
able to issue shares of Common Stock to investors in a
$500 million Capital Raise, which will preclude us from
compelling the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock
into Common Stock. In addition, if stockholders do not approve
this proposal, we will not be able to issue shares to BNS if it
exercises its anti-dilution right or in a rights offering.
If BNS exercises it anti-dilution right and we cannot issue
shares to BNS, this may constitute a breach of the Stockholder
Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other relief
against us. If we need to continue to recognize significant
reserves and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation
and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital
requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the
approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the
capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. See
Overview of the Proposals Background for
further discussion of consequences if we are unable to complete
the Exchange Offer.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of Common Stock.
Required
Vote
Approval of Proposal No. 6 to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will
have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
FROM 750,000,000 TO 2,000,000,000.
31
PROPOSAL NO. 7
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
Overview
and Reasons for the Amendment
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted
resolutions approving and authorizing an amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split at
a ratio of not less than one-for-ten and not more than
one-for-twenty and directing that the amendment be submitted to
a vote of the stockholders at the Special Meeting. In accordance
with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to
our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split
requires stockholder approval.
On July 9, 2010, First BanCorp. received notice from the
New York Stock Exchange that the Corporation was not in
compliance with the minimum price per share continued listing
requirement set forth in Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual (the Notice). The Notice indicated
that the Corporation was not in compliance with such continued
listing requirement because, as of July 6, 2010, the
average closing price of the Common Stock was less than $1.00
over the consecutive 30
trading-day
period immediately prior to the Notice.
On July 22, 2009, the Corporation informed the NYSE that it
intended to cure this deficiency within six months following the
date of the Notice by bringing the Common Stock share price and
average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00.
Specifically, the Corporation has informed the NYSE of its
intent to cure the deficiency by implementing a reverse stock
split, if necessary.
If the proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, the Board
of Directors will determine, prior to the filing of the
amendment with the Puerto Rico Department of State, whether a
reverse stock split is in the best interest of stockholders, and
if so, the ratio for such split. The Board of Directors will
consider, among other things, the market price and liquidity of
our Common Stock prior to implementing a reverse stock split.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement is the
proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.
If stockholders approve this Proposal at the Special Meeting but
the Board does not implement a reverse stock split by the close
of business on January 9, 2011, the Board will not have
authority to implement a reverse stock split pursuant to such
approval.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal and the Board Implements a
Reverse Stock Split
If stockholders approve this proposal and the Board determines
that it is in the best interests of stockholders to implement
the reverse stock split, a number of outstanding shares of
Common Stock ranging from 10 to 20 shares, depending on the
reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board, of
outstanding Common Stock will be converted into one share of
Common Stock.
Reduction of Shares Held by Individual
Stockholders. Each common stockholder will own
fewer shares of Common Stock, but the proposed reverse stock
split will affect all common stockholders proportionately and
will not affect any stockholders percentage ownership
interest or proportionate voting power, except for differences
resulting from the treatment of fractional shares.
However, if the reverse stock split were implemented, it may
increase the number of stockholders who own odd
lots, or a number of shares that is less than
100 shares. Such stockholders may find it difficult to sell
such shares and in connection with any sale may have to pay
higher commissions and other transaction costs as compared to a
sale involving a round lot, or a number that is in
even multiples of 100.
Impact on Authorized and Outstanding
Shares. In connection with the reverse stock
split, we will not reduce the total number of authorized shares
of Common Stock. As previously disclosed, as a result of the
continuing difficult economic conditions, we decided to seek to
improve our capital structure. Thus, we have been taking steps
to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and
regulatory capital through (1) the issuance of shares of
Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, (2) the issuance of
approximately $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise,
(3) the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of
Series G
32
Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in
exchange for Series F Preferred Stock, and (4) a
rights offering to common stockholders. Since we have
92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
July 22, 2010, we do not have enough shares of Common Stock
authorized for issuance to complete the above transactions. As
outlined in Proposal No. 6, the Board of Directors has
proposed an increase in the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock to enable us to complete the transactions described
above.
If adopted and implemented by the Board of Directors, this
amendment will become effective upon filing with the Puerto Rico
Department of State. We expect that the Board will implement a
reverse stock split only if necessary to comply with the NYSE
continued listing requirement.
Anti-takeover Effects. Similar to
Proposal No. 6, under certain circumstances, the
proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation could have
an anti-takeover effect. The resulting increase in the number of
authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock may discourage or
make more difficult a change in control of the Corporation. For
example, we could issue additional shares to dilute the voting
power of, create voting impediments for, or otherwise frustrate
the efforts of persons seeking to take over or gain control of
the Corporation, whether or not the change in control is favored
by a majority of our unaffiliated stockholders. We could also
privately place shares of Common Stock with purchasers who would
side with our Board of Directors in opposing a hostile takeover
bid, except that we would need stockholder approval of any such
private sales that exceed 20% of the outstanding shares prior to
the sale. Except for the possible acquisition of approximately
21% of Common Stock by the U.S. Treasury if the
Series G Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock,
assuming we issue approximately 1.68 billion shares in the
Exchange Offer, in a Capital Raise and to BNS at the market
price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010 of $0.57, the
Board of Directors is not aware of any plans for or attempt to
effect a change in control of the Corporation.
Impact on Equity Compensation Plans and Outstanding
Awards. The reverse stock split will impact the
number of shares of common stock available for issuance under
the Corporations equity incentive plans in proportion to
the reverse stock split ratio. Under the terms of the
Corporations outstanding equity awards, the reverse stock
split would cause a reduction in the number of shares of Common
Stock issuable upon exercise, settlement or vesting of such
awards in proportion to the exchange ratio of the reverse stock
split and would cause a proportionate increase in the exercise
price of such awards to the extent they are stock options or
similar awards. The aggregate number of shares authorized for
future issuance under the Corporations equity incentive
plans will also be proportionately reduced, as will the maximum
aggregate limit on the number of shares that may be granted to
any one participant under the respective plans. In implementing
the proportionate reduction, the number of shares issuable upon
exercise, settlement or vesting of outstanding equity awards
will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.
No Assurance Regarding Impact on the Corporations Stock
Price. If the Board implements a reverse stock
split, the Board expects that the reverse stock split would
increase the market price of our Common Stock so that the
Corporation is able to bring the Common Stock share price and
average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00
and, thereby, regain compliance with this NYSE continued listing
requirement. No assurance can be provided, however, that the
market price of the Corporations Common Stock will exceed
or remain in excess of the $1.00 per share minimum price after a
reverse stock split. It is possible that the per share price of
common stock after the reverse stock split will not rise in
proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of common
stock outstanding resulting from the reverse stock split.
Furthermore, the market price of the stock may be affected by
other factors that may be unrelated to the number of shares
outstanding, including the Corporations performance.
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve this proposal we will not be able
to implement a reverse stock split. The inability to implement a
reverse stock split may hinder our ability to bring our Common
Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive
trading days above $1.00, which is a listing requirement of the
NYSE. The NYSE will commence suspension and delisting procedures
if we cannot regain compliance with this requirement by
January 9, 2011. If the NYSE delisted the Common Stock, the
market liquidity of our Common Stock would be adversely affected.
33
Board
Discretion to Implement the Reverse Stock Split
If the proposed amendment is approved by our stockholders, it
will be implemented, if at all, only upon a determination by our
Board of Directors that a reverse stock split, at a ratio
determined by the Board of Directors within the range of
one-for-ten
and one-for-twenty, is in the best interests of stockholders.
The Board of Directors determination as to whether such a
split will be implemented and, if so, the ratio, will be based
upon several factors, including existing and expected
marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock, prevailing
market conditions and the likely effect on the market price of
our Common Stock. If our Board of Directors determines to
implement a reverse stock split, the Board of Directors will
consider various factors in selecting the ratio including the
overall market conditions at the time and the recent trading
history of our Common Stock.
Fractional
Shares
Stockholders will not receive fractional shares in connection
with a reverse stock split. Instead, our exchange agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, will aggregate
all fractional shares and arrange for them to be sold as soon as
practicable after the split is implemented at the then
prevailing prices on the open market on behalf of those
stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a
fractional share. We expect that the exchange agent will cause
the sale to be conducted in an orderly fashion at a reasonable
pace and that it may take several days to sell all of the
aggregated fractional shares of Common Stock. After completing
the sale, stockholders will receive a cash payment from the
exchange agent in an amount equal to the stockholders pro
rata share of the total net proceeds of these sales. No
transaction costs will be assessed on the sale; however, the
proceeds will be subject to certain taxes as discussed below. In
addition, stockholders will not be entitled to receive interest
for the period of time between implementation of a reverse stock
split and the date a stockholder receives payment for the
cashed-out shares. The payment amount will be paid to the
stockholder in the form of a check.
After a reverse stock split, stockholders will have no further
interest in the Corporation with respect to their cashed-out
fractional shares. A stockholder will not have any voting,
dividend or other rights with respect to its fractional share
except to receive payment as described above.
Stock
Certificates
If stockholders approve the amendment to our Articles of
Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split and the reverse
stock split is implemented, as soon as practicable after the
date the Board decides to implement the reverse stock split and
the amendment implementing the reverse stock split becomes
effective, the Corporation will send a letter of transmittal to
each stockholder of record at the effective time for use in
transmitting old stock certificates to our transfer agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, who will serve
as our exchange agent. The letter of transmittal will contain
instructions for the surrender of old certificates to the
exchange agent in exchange for new certificates representing the
number of shares of Common Stock into which such holders
shares represented by the old certificates have been converted
as a result of the reverse stock split. Until so surrendered,
each current certificate representing shares of our stock will
be deemed for all corporate purposes after the effective time of
the amendment implementing the reverse stock split to evidence
ownership of shares in the appropriately reduced whole number of
shares of Common Stock. Stockholders should not destroy any
stock certificates and should not send in their old certificates
to the exchange agent until they have received the letter of
transmittal.
Persons holding their shares in street name through
banks, brokers or other nominees will be contacted by such
banks, brokers or nominees and will not receive a letter of
transmittal from the Corporation. Banks, brokers, and other
nominees holding shares of Common Stock for stockholders will be
instructed to implement the reverse stock split for such
beneficial holders, and these banks, brokers, and other nominees
may apply their own specific procedures for processing the
reverse stock split.
34
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
Certain
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of certain U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the reverse stock split that may be
relevant to stockholders. This summary is based upon the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
(the Code), Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder, published administrative rulings and judicial
decisions as of the date hereof, all of which may change,
possibly with retroactive effect, resulting in U.S. federal
income tax consequences that may differ from those discussed
below. This summary does not purport to be complete and does not
address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be
relevant to stockholders in light of their particular
circumstances or to stockholders that may be subject to special
tax rules, including, without limitation: (1) stockholders
subject to the alternative minimum tax; (2) banks,
insurance companies, or other financial institutions;
(3) tax-exempt organizations; (4) dealers in
securities or commodities; (5) regulated investment
companies or real estate investment trusts; (6) traders in
securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for their securities holdings;
(7) foreign stockholders or U.S. stockholders whose
functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
(8) persons holding the Common Stock as a position in a
hedging transaction, straddle, conversion
transaction or other risk reduction transaction;
(9) persons who acquire shares of the Common Stock in
connection with employment or other performance of services;
(10) dealers and other stockholders that do not own their
shares of Common Stock as capital assets;
(11) U.S. expatriates, (12) foreign entities; or
(13) non-resident alien individuals. In addition, this
summary does not address the tax consequences arising under the
laws of any foreign, state or local jurisdiction and
U.S. federal tax consequences other than federal income
taxation. Furthermore, this summary also assumes that shares of
Common Stock, both before and after the reverse stock split, are
held as a capital asset as defined in the Code,
which is generally property held for investment. If a
partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds
shares of the Common Stock, the tax treatment of a partner in
the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the
partner and the activities of the partnership.
We have not sought, and will not seek, an opinion of counsel or
a ruling from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the reverse stock split and there can be no
assurance the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will
not challenge the statements and conclusions set forth below or
that a court would not sustain any such challenge. You should
consult your tax advisor as to the application to your
particular situation of the tax consequences discussed below, as
well as the application of any state, local, foreign or other
tax.
Tax Consequences Generally. The reverse stock
split should constitute a recapitalization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a
stockholder generally should not recognize gain or loss upon the
reverse stock split, except with respect to cash received in
lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock, as discussed
below. A stockholders aggregate tax basis in the shares of
the Common Stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split
should equal the aggregate tax basis of the shares of the Common
Stock surrendered (excluding any portion of such basis that is
allocated to any fractional share of the Common Stock), and such
stockholders holding period (i.e., acquired date)
in the shares of the Common Stock received should include the
holding period in the shares of the Common Stock surrendered.
Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code provide detailed
rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period of the
shares of the Common Stock surrendered to the shares of the
Common Stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split.
Stockholders who acquired their shares of Common Stock on
different dates and at different prices should consult their tax
advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding
period of such shares.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares. A
stockholder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of
the Common Stock pursuant to the reverse stock split generally
should recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and the
holders tax basis in the shares of the Common Stock
surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share of the
Common Stock. Such capital gain
35
or loss should be long term capital gain or loss if the
holders holding period for the Common Stock surrendered
exceeded one year at the effective time of the reverse stock
split.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding. Information returns generally will
be required to be filed with the IRS with respect to the receipt
of cash in lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock
pursuant to the reverse stock split. In addition, stockholders
may be subject to a backup withholding tax (currently at an
applicable rate of 28%) on the payment of such cash if they do
not provide their taxpayer identification numbers in the manner
required or otherwise fail to comply with applicable backup
withholding tax rules. Backup withholding is not an additional
tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may
be refunded or allowed as a credit against the
stockholders federal income tax liability, if any,
provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Certain
Puerto Rico Tax Consequences
The following discussion describes the material Puerto Rico tax
consequences relating to the proposed stock split. It does not
purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax
considerations arising from or relating to the proposed reverse
stock split and does not describe any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, locality or taxing jurisdiction
other than Puerto Rico. It does not address special classes of
holders, such as life insurance companies, special partnerships,
corporations of individuals, registered investment companies,
estate and trusts and tax-exempt organizations.
This discussion is based on the tax laws of Puerto Rico as in
effect on the date of this Proxy Statement, as well as
regulations, administrative pronouncements and judicial
decisions available on or before such date and now in effect.
All of the foregoing are subject to change, which change could
apply retroactively and could affect the continued validity of
this summary.
You should consult your own tax advisor as to the application to
your particular situation of the tax considerations discussed
below, as well as the application of any state, local, foreign
or other tax.
Subject to the above stated, Puerto Rico income tax consequences
of the proposed reversed stock split described herein may be
summarized as follows:
1. The reverse stock split will qualify as a tax-free
recapitalization under the Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Internal
Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. Accordingly, except for any
cash received in lieu of fractional shares, a shareholder will
not recognize any gain or loss for Puerto Rico income tax
purposes as a result of the receipt of the post-reverse stock
split common stock pursuant to the reverse stock split.
2. The shares of post-reverse stock split common stock in
the hands of a shareholder will have an aggregate basis for
computing gain or loss on a subsequent disposition equal to the
aggregate basis of the shares of pre-reverse stock split common
stock held by that shareholder immediately prior to the reversed
stock split, reduced by the basis allocable to any fractional
shares which the shareholder is treated as having sold for cash,
as discussed in paragraph 4 below.
3. A shareholders holding period for the post-reverse
stock split common stock will include the holding period of the
pre-reverse stock split common stock exchanged.
4. Shareholders who receive cash for fractional shares will
generally be treated for Puerto Rico income tax purposes as
having sold their fractional shares and will recognize gain or
loss in an amount equal to the difference between the cash
received and the portion of the of their basis for the
pre-reverse stock split common stock allocated to the fractional
shares. Such gain or loss will generally be a capital gain or
loss if the stock was held as a capital asset, and such gain or
loss will be long-term gain or loss to the extent that the
shareholders holding period exceeds 6 months for
Puerto Rico income tax purposes.
5. Shareholders who do not hold fractional shares and only
receive post-reverse stock split common stock for their
pre-reverse stock split common stock pursuant to the reverse
stock split should not recognize any gain or loss for Puerto
Rico income tax purposes as a result of the reverse stock split.
36
6. Any gain or loss from the sale of fractional shares as
discussed above realized by a shareholder that is not a resident
of Puerto Rico will not be subject to income taxation in Puerto
Rico.
7. Puerto Rico information reporting requirements will
apply with respect to the cash proceeds to be received by the
non-corporate shareholders in lieu of fractional shares.
Required
Vote
Approval of Proposal No. 7 to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will
have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO
IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AT AN EXCHANGE RATIO THAT WILL
BE WITHIN A RANGE OF ONE-FOR-TEN AND ONE-FOR-TWENTY, WHICH WILL
BE DETERMINED BY THE CORPORATIONS BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
SEC rules provide that stockholders must submit to a company any
proposals that they would like included in a companys
proxy statement no later than 120 days before the first
anniversary of the date on which the previous years proxy
statement was first mailed to stockholders unless the date of
the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days
from the date of the previous years meeting. When the date
is changed by more than 30 days from the date of the
previous years meeting, the deadline is a reasonable time
before the company begins to print and send its proxy materials.
In accordance with our By-laws, we expect to hold our 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders on or before April 26, 2011,
subject to the right of the Board of Directors to change such
date based on changed circumstances.
Any proposal that a stockholder wishes to have considered for
presentation at the 2011 Annual Meeting and included in our
proxy statement and form of proxy used in connection with such
meeting must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Corporation at
the principal executive offices of the Corporation no later than
December 7, 2010. Any such proposal must comply with the
requirements of
Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Under the Corporations By-laws, if a stockholder seeks to
propose a nominee for director for consideration at the annual
meeting of stockholders, notice must be received by the
Secretary of the Corporation at least 30 days prior to the
date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, under
the By-laws, any stockholders nominations for directors for
consideration at the 2011 Annual Meeting must be received by the
Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices
of the Corporation no later than March 25, 2011.
37
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
The financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 and the related managements discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
including the selected quarterly financial data and quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk, set forth in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
and the financial statements for the interim period ended March
31, 2010 and the related managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
including quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market
risk, set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 attached as Exhibits C and D,
respectively, to this Proxy Statement, are incorporated herein
by reference. Our auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are not
expected to be represented at the Special Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Lawrence Odell
Secretary
Santurce, Puerto Rico
August 2, 2010
38
Exhibit A
Proposed
Amendment to
Article SIXTH of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation
(new language in bold and deleted language in brackets)
SIXTH
The authorized capital of the Corporation shall be [EIGHT
HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($800,000,000)] TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
MILLION DOLLARS ($250,000,000) represented by [SEVEN
HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION (750,000,000)] TWO BILLION
(2,000,000,000) shares of common stock, [ONE DOLLAR ($1.00)]
TEN CENTS ($0.10) par value per share, and FIFTY MILLION
(50,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) par
value per share.
The shares may be issued by the Corporation from time to time as
authorized by the board of directors without the further
approval of shareholders, except as otherwise provided in this
Article Sixth or to the extent that such approval is
required by governing law, rule or regulations. No shares of
capital stock (including shares issuable upon conversion,
exchange or exercise of other securities) shall be issued,
directly or indirectly, to officers, directors or controlling
persons of the Corporation other than as part of a general
public offering, unless their issuance or the plan (including
stock option plans) under which they would be issued has been
approved by a majority of the total votes to be cast at a legal
meeting of stockholders.
The board of directors is expressly authorized to provide, when
it deems necessary, for the issuance of shares of preferred
stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, and with
such designations, preferences, rights, qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be expressed in
resolution or resolutions of the board of directors, authorizing
such issuance, including (but without limiting the generality of
the foregoing) the following:
(a) the designation of such series;
(b) the dividend rate of such series, the conditions and
dates upon which the dividends shall be payable, the preference
or relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends
payable on any other class or classes of capital stock of the
Corporation, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or
non-cumulative;
(c) whether the shares of such series shall be subject to
redemption by the Corporation, and if made subject to such
redemption, the terms and conditions of such redemption;
(d) the terms and amount of any sinking fund provided for
the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series;
(e) whether the shares of such series shall be convertible
and if provision be made for conversion, the terms of such
conversion;
(f) the extent, if any, to which the holders of such shares
shall be entitled to vote; provided however, that in no event,
shall any holder of any series of preferred stock be entitled to
more than vote for each such share;
(g) the restrictions and conditions, if any, upon the issue
or re-issue of any additional preferred stock ranking on a
parity with or prior to such shares as to dividends or upon
dissolution; and
(h) the rights of the holders of such shares upon
dissolution of, or upon distribution of assets of the
Corporation, which rights may be different in the case of
voluntary dissolution.
A-1
Exhibit B
Proposed Amendment to
Article SIXTH of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation
(new language in bold)
The following is hereby added to the end of Article SIXTH:
Effective upon the filing of this Restated Articles of
Incorporation with Puerto Rico Department of State (the
Effective Time), every [number ranging from 10 to
20] shares of Common Stock, par value [$1.00 per share][or
$0.10 per share if Proposal No. 3 is adopted], issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall,
automatically and without any action on the part of the
respective holders thereof, be combined, reclassified and
changed into one fully paid and non-assessable share of Common
Stock, par value [$1.00/$0.10] per share; provided, however,
that no fractional shares shall be issued. Stockholders who
would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share will receive a
cash payment in lieu of such fractional share.
Any Stockholder who, immediately prior to the Effective
Time, owns a number of shares of Old Common Stock which is not
evenly divisible by [number ranging from 10 to 20] shall, with
respect to such fractional interest, be entitled to receive cash
in lieu of any fractional share of New Common Stock in an amount
equal to the Stockholders pro rata share of net proceeds
attributable to the sale of such fractional shares following the
aggregation and sale by the Corporations exchange agent of
all fractional shares of New Common Stock otherwise issuable.
Each certificate that theretofore represented shares of Old
Common Stock shall thereafter represent the number of shares of
New Common Stock into which shares of Old Common Stock
represented by such certificate shall have been reclassified and
combined; provided, that each person holding of record a stock
certificate or certificates that represented shares of Old
Common Stock shall receive upon surrender of such certificate or
certificates, a new certificate or certificates evidencing and
representing the number of shares of New Common Stock to which
such person is entitled under the foregoing reclassification and
combination.
B-1
Exhibit C
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
C-1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal
Year Ended December 31,
2009
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
66-0561882
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
(Address of principal
executive office)
|
|
00908
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(787)
729-8200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock ($1.00 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series A (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series B (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series C (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series D (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series E (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well- known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by
non affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 (the
last day of the registrants most recently completed second
quarter) was $328,696,232 based on the closing price of $3.95
per share of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
June 30, 2009. The registrant had no nonvoting common
equity outstanding as of June 30, 2009. For the purposes of
the foregoing calculation only, registrant has treated as common
stock held by affiliates only common stock of the registrant
held by its directors and executive officers and voting stock
held by the registrants employee benefit plans. The
registrants response to this item is not intended to be an
admission that any person is an affiliate of the registrant for
any purposes other than this response.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date: 92,542,722 shares as of January 31,
2010.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2010, which will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the registrants fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference into
Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, of this
Form-10-K.
FIRST
BANCORP
2009
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
2
Forward
Looking Statements
This
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
When used in this
Form 10-K
or future filings by First BanCorp (the Corporation)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
in the Corporations press releases or in other public or
stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the
approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases
would be, will allow, intends
to, will likely result, are expected
to, should, anticipate and similar
expressions are meant to identify forward-looking
statements.
First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue
reliance on any such forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date made, and represent First
BanCorps expectations of future conditions or results and
are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises
readers that various factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but
are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about whether the Corporations actions to
improve its capital structure will have their intended effect;
|
|
|
|
the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the
consumer and commercial credit sector and their impact on the
credit quality of the Corporations loans and other assets,
including the Corporations construction and commercial
real estate loan portfolios, which have contributed and may
continue to contribute to, among other things, the increase in
the levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the
provision expense;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United
States and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate scenario,
market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices
and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may
reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect
demand for all of the Corporations products and services
and the value of the Corporations assets, including the
value of derivative instruments used for protection from
interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
the Corporations reliance on brokered certificates of
deposit and its ability to continue to rely on the issuance of
brokered certificates of deposit to fund operations and provide
liquidity;
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in the Corporations ability to attract
new clients and retain existing ones;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for the Corporations products and
services and lower revenues and earnings because of the
continued recession in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal
problems and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government;
|
|
|
|
a need to recognize additional impairments of financial
instruments or goodwill relating to acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for
financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States
and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could affect
the Corporations financial performance and could cause the
Corporations actual results for future periods to differ
materially from prior results and anticipated or projected
results;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions
undertaken to stimulate the U.S. economy and stabilize the
U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may
have on the Corporations business, financial condition and
results of operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of
the federal government, including those determined by the
Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve), the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in
Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit
insurance premium
and/or
require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund,
causing an additional increase in our non-interest expense;
|
|
|
|
risks of an additional allowance as a result of an analysis of
the ability to generate sufficient income to realize the benefit
of the deferred tax asset;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman
Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
changes in the Corporations expenses associated with
acquisitions and dispositions;
|
|
|
|
developments in technology;
|
|
|
|
the impact of Doral Financial Corporations financial
condition on the repayment of its outstanding secured loans to
the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings
of the Corporations securities;
|
|
|
|
general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and
|
|
|
|
the possible future dilution to holders of our Common Stock
resulting from additional issuances of Common Stock or
securities convertible into Common Stock.
|
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims
any obligation, to update any of the forward- looking
statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events
or circumstances after the date of such statements except as
required by the federal securities laws.
Investors should carefully consider these factors and the risk
factors outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
4
PART I
FirstBanCorp, incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, is sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as the Corporation, we, our,
the Registrant.
GENERAL
First BanCorp is a publicly-owned financial holding company that
is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the
Federal Reserve Board (the FED). The Corporation was
incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
to serve as the bank holding company for FirstBank Puerto Rico
(FirstBank or the Bank). The Corporation
is a full service provider of financial services and products
with operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the US and
British Virgin Islands. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation had total assets of $19.6 billion, total
deposits of $12.7 billion and total stockholders
equity of $1.6 billion.
The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for
retail, commercial and institutional clients. As of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation controlled three
wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank, FirstBank Insurance
Agency, Inc. (FirstBank Insurance Agency) and Grupo
Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a PR Finance
Group). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial
bank, FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto Rico-chartered
insurance agency and PR Finance Group is a domestic corporation.
FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and
regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
(OCIF) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the FDIC). Deposits are insured through the FDIC
Deposit Insurance Fund. In addition, within FirstBank, the
Banks United States Virgin Islands operations are subject
to regulation and examination by the United States Virgin
Islands Banking Board, and the British Virgin Islands operations
are subject to regulation by the British Virgin Islands
Financial Services Commission. FirstBank Insurance Agency is
subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the
Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico and operates nine offices in Puerto Rico. PR Finance
Group is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation
of the OCIF.
FirstBank conducted its business through its main office located
in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking
branches in Puerto Rico, sixteen branches in the United States
Virgin Islands (USVI) and British Virgin Islands (BVI) and ten
branches in the state of Florida (USA). FirstBank had six
wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First
Leasing and Rental Corporation, a vehicle leasing company with
two offices in Puerto Rico; First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a
Money Express La Financiera), a finance company specializing in
the origination of small loans with twenty-seven offices in
Puerto Rico; First Mortgage, Inc. (First Mortgage),
a residential mortgage loan origination company with
thirty-eight offices in FirstBank branches and at stand alone
sites; First Management of Puerto Rico, a domestic corporation;
FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp, a broker-dealer
subsidiary created in March 2009 and engaged in municipal bond
underwriting and financial advisory services on structured
financings principally provided to government entities in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and FirstBank Overseas Corporation,
an international banking entity organized under the
International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico. FirstBank had
three subsidiaries with operations outside of Puerto Rico: First
Insurance Agency VI, Inc., an insurance agency with three
offices that sells insurance products in the USVI; and First
Express, a finance company specializing in the origination of
small loans with three offices in the USVI.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation consolidated the
operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and
loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and
into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General
Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida. On
October 30, 2009, the Corporation divested its motor
vehicle rental operations held through First Leasing and Rental
Corporation through the sale of such business.
5
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
The Corporation has six reportable segments: Commercial and
Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking;
Treasury and Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin
Islands Operations. These segments are described below:
Commercial
and Corporate Banking
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the
Corporations lending and other services for the public
sector and specialized industries such as healthcare, tourism,
financial institutions, food and beverage, shopping centers and
middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real
estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash
management and business management services. A substantial
portion of this portfolio is secured by the underlying value of
the real estate collateral, and collateral and the personal
guarantees of the borrowers are taken in abundance of caution.
Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a
typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in
size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the
Corporation has and maintains a credit risk management
infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated
with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan
review functions, sales of loan participations and continuous
monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
Mortgage
Banking
The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly
through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary,
FirstMortgage. These operations consist of the origination, sale
and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans
products. Originations are sourced through different channels
such as branches, mortgage bankers and real estate brokers, and
in association with new project developers. FirstMortgage
focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of
which conform to Federal Housing Administration
(FHA), Veterans Administration (VA) and
Rural Development (RD) standards. Loans originated
that meet FHA standards qualify for the federal agencys
insurance program whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards
are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. In December
2008, the Corporation obtained from the Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA) the necessary Commitment
Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this
program, during 2009, the Corporation completed the
securitization of approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA
mortgage loans into GNMA MBS.
Mortgage loans that do not qualify under these programs are
commonly referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real
estate loans could be conforming and non-conforming. Conforming
loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards
for sale under the Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac
(FHLMC) programs whereas loans that do not meet the
standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real
estate loans. The Corporations strategy is to penetrate
markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality
mortgage products to serve their financial needs faster and
simpler and at competitive prices. The Mortgage Banking segment
also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets.
Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors
like FNMA and FHLMC. More than 90% of the Corporations
residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate,
fully amortizing, full documentation loans that have a lower
risk than the typical
sub-prime
loans that have adversely affected the U.S. real estate
market. The Corporation is not active in negative amortization
loans or option adjustable rate mortgage loans (ARMs) including
ARMs with teaser rates.
Consumer
(Retail) Banking
The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the
Corporations consumer lending and deposit-taking
activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan
centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boat,
lines of credit, and personal loans. Deposit products include
interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings
accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail
certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each
branch of FirstBanks retail network serve as one of the
funding sources for the lending and investment activities.
6
Consumer lending has been mainly driven by auto loan
originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of seeking to
provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers that
provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporations auto
loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to our
commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains
strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the
foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The
Corporations commercial relations with floor plan dealers
are strong and directly benefit the Corporations consumer
lending operation and are managed as part of the consumer
banking activities.
Personal loans and, to a lesser extent, marine financing and a
small revolving credit portfolio also contribute to interest
income generated on consumer lending. Credit card accounts are
issued under the Banks name through an alliance with FIA
Card Services (Bank of America), which bears the credit risk.
Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loans
market, applying the Corporations strict underwriting
standards.
Treasury
and Investments
The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the
Corporations treasury and investment management functions.
In the treasury function, which includes funding and liquidity
management, this segment sells funds to the Commercial and
Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer (Retail)
Banking segments to finance their lending activities and
purchases funds gathered by those segments. Funds not gathered
by the different business units are obtained by the Treasury
Division through wholesale channels, such as brokered deposits,
Advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with investment
securities, among others.
Since the Corporation is a net borrower of funds, the securities
portfolio does not result from the investment of excess funds.
The securities portfolio is a leverage strategy for the purposes
of liquidity management, interest rate management and earnings
enhancement.
The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and
Investments are based on market rates.
United
States Operations
The United States operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland.
The Corporation provides a wide range of banking services to
individual and corporate customers in the state of Florida
through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers. In
the United States, the Corporation originally had an agency
lending office in Miami, Florida. Then, it acquired Coral
Gables-based Ponce General (the parent company of Unibank, a
savings and loans bank in 2005) and changed the savings and
loans name to FirstBank Florida. Those two entities were
operated separately. In 2009, the Corporation filed an
application with the Office of Thrift Supervision to surrender
the Miami-based FirstBank Florida charter and merge its assets
into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the main subsidiary of First
BanCorp. The Corporation placed the entire Florida operation
under the control of a new appointed Executive Vice President.
The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by
leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and
thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the
Florida market.
Virgin
Islands Operations
The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. and British
Virgin Islands, including retail and commercial banking
services. In 2002, after acquiring Chase Manhattan Bank
operations in the Virgin Islands, FirstBank became the largest
bank in the Virgin Islands (USVI & BVI), serving St.
Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola and Virgin Gorda, with
16 branches. In 2008, FirstBank acquired the Virgin Island
Community Bank (VICB) in St. Croix, increasing
its customer base and share in this market. The Virgin Islands
operations segment is driven by its consumer and commercial
lending and deposit-taking activities. Loans to consumers
include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal loans and
residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest
bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts,
Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of
deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as
the funding sources for the lending activities.
7
For information regarding First BanCorps reportable
segments, please refer to Note 33, Segment
Information, to the Corporations financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation and its
subsidiaries employed 2,713 persons. None of its employees
are represented by a collective bargaining group. The
Corporation considers its employee relations to be good.
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS DURING 2009
Participation
in the U.S. Treasury Departments Capital Purchase
Program
On January 16, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter
Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) pursuant to which Treasury invested
$400,000,000 in preferred stock of the Corporation under the
Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase
Program. Under the Letter Agreement, which incorporates the
Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms (the
Purchase Agreement), the Corporation issued and sold
to Treasury (1) 400,000 shares of the
Corporations Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share
(the Series F Preferred Stock), and (2) a
warrant dated January 16, 2009 (the Warrant) to
purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common
stock (the Warrant shares) at an exercise price of
$10.27 per share. The exercise price of the Warrant was
determined based upon the average of the closing prices of the
Corporations common stock during the 20-trading day period
ended December 19, 2008, the last trading day prior to the
date the Corporations application to participate in the
program was preliminarily approved. The Purchase Agreement is
incorporated into Exhibit 10.4 hereto by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporations
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 20, 2009.
The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1
regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F
Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference amount
on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first
five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will
only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporations
Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore.
The Series F Preferred Stock will rank pari passu with the
Corporations existing 7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, 8.35%
Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B, 7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series C, 7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D, and 7.00%
Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions
upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation.
The Purchase Agreement contains limitations on the payment of
dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly
cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly
cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced
(if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008,
which is $0.07 per share. The ability of the Corporation to
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any
shares of its common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred
securities are subject to restrictions outlined in the Purchase
Agreement, including upon a default in the payment of dividends.
The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends effective in
August 2009. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of
(a) January 16, 2012 and (b) the date on which
the Series F Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or
Treasury transfers all of the Series F Preferred Stock to
third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury.
The shares of Series F Preferred Stock are non-voting,
other than having class voting rights on certain matters that
could adversely affect the Series F Preferred Stock. If
dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock have not been
paid for an aggregate of six quarterly dividend periods or more,
whether or not consecutive, the Corporations authorized
number of directors will be increased automatically by two and
the holders of the Series F Preferred Stock, voting
together with holders of any then outstanding parity stock, will
have the right to elect two directors to fill such newly created
directorships at the Corporations next annual meeting of
stockholders or at a special meeting of stockholders called for
that purpose prior to such annual meeting.
8
These preferred share directors will be elected annually and
will serve until all accrued and unpaid dividends on the
Series F Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in
full.
On January 13, 2009, the Corporation filed a Certificate of
Designations (the Certificate of Designations) with
the Puerto Rico Department of State for the purpose of amending
its Certificate of Incorporation to fix the designations,
preferences, limitations and relative rights of the
Series F Preferred Stock.
As per the Purchase Agreement, prior to January 16, 2012,
the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the shares of
Series F Preferred Stock only with proceeds from one or
more Qualified Equity Offerings, as such term is
defined in the Certificate of Designations. After
January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to
the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, in whole or in part, out of funds legally available
therefore, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock then
outstanding. Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009, subject to consultation with the appropriate
Federal banking agency, the Secretary of Treasury may permit a
TARP recipient to repay any financial assistance previously
provided under TARP without regard to whether the financial
institution has replaced such funds from any other source.
The Warrant has a ten-year term and is exercisable at any time
for 5,842,259 shares of First BanCorp common stock at an
exercise price of $10.27. The exercise price and the number of
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are
adjustable in a number of circumstances, as discussed below. The
exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of the Warrant will be adjusted proportionately:
|
|
|
|
|
in the event of a stock split, subdivision, reclassification or
combination of the outstanding shares of common stock;
|
|
|
|
until the earlier of the date the Treasury no longer holds the
Warrant or any portion thereof or January 16, 2012, if the
Corporation issues shares of common stock or securities
convertible into common stock for no consideration or at a price
per share that is less than 90% of the market price on the last
trading day preceding the date of the pricing of such sale. Any
amounts that the Corporation receives in connection with the
issuance of such shares or convertible securities will be deemed
to be equal to the sum of the net offering price of all such
securities plus the minimum aggregate amount, if any, payable
upon exercise or conversion of any such convertible securities;
no adjustment will be required with respect to
(i) consideration for or to fund business or asset
acquisitions, (ii) shares issued in connection with
employee benefit plans and compensation arrangements in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice approved by the
Corporations Board of Directors, (iii) a public or
broadly marketed offering and sale by the Corporation or its
affiliates of the Corporations common stock or convertible
securities for cash pursuant to registration under the
Securities Act or issuance under Rule 144A on a basis
consistent with capital raising transactions by comparable
financial institutions, and (iv) the exercise of preemptive
rights on terms existing on January 16, 2009;
|
|
|
|
in connection with the Corporations distributions to
security holders (e.g., stock dividends);
|
|
|
|
in connection with certain repurchases of common stock by the
Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
in connection with certain business combinations.
|
None of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the
Warrant, or the Warrant shares are subject to any contractual
restriction on transfer. The Series F Preferred Stock and
the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. The Corporation registered for resale
shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the
Warrant shares, and the sale of the Warrant shares by the
Corporation to any purchasers of the Warrant. In addition, under
the shelf registration, the Corporation registered the resale of
9,250,450 shares of common stock by or on behalf of the
Bank of Nova Scotia, its pledges, donees, transferees or other
successors in interest.
Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, (i) the
Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other
benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance
and employment agreements), to the extent necessary to be in
compliance with the executive compensation and corporate
9
governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency
Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or
regulations and (ii) each Senior Executive Officer, as
defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver
releasing Treasury and the Corporation from any claims that such
officers may otherwise have as a result of the
Corporations amendment of such arrangements and agreements
to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until such time as
Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the
Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the
Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.
Reduction
of credit exposure with financial institutions
The Corporation has continued working on the reduction of its
credit exposure with Doral and R&G Financial. During
the second quarter of 2009, the Bank purchased from
R&G Financial $205 million of residential
mortgages that previously served as collateral for a commercial
loan extended to R&G . The purchase price of the
transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the
commercial loan, thereby significantly reducing the
Corporations exposure to a single borrower. As of
December 31, 2009, there still an outstanding balance of
$321.5 million due from Doral.
Surrender
of the stock savings and loans association charter in
Florida
Effective July 1, 2009 as part of the merger of FirstBank
Florida with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, FirstBank Florida
surrendered its stock savings and loans association charter
granted by the Office of Thrift Supervsion. Under the regulatory
oversight of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and under
the FirstBank Florida trade name, FirstBank continues to offer
the same services offered by the former stock savings and loans
association through its branch network in Florida.
Dividend
Suspension
On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that
the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the
common and preferred dividends, including the Series F
Preferred Stock, effective with the preferred dividend payments
for the month of August 2009.
Business
Developments
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation consolidated the
operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and
loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and
into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General
Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida.
On October 31, 2009, First Leasing and Rental Corporation
sold its motor vehicle rental operations and realized a nominal
gain of $0.2 million.
Credit
Ratings
The Corporations credit as long-term issuer is currently
rated B by Standard & Poors
(S&P) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited
(Fitch); both with negative outlook.
FirstBanks long-term senior debt rating is currently rated
B1 by Moodys Investor Service (Moodys), four
notches below their definition of investment grade; B by
S&P, and B by Fitch, both five notches under their
definition of investment grade. The outlook on the Banks
credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative.
WEBSITE
ACCESS TO REPORT
The Corporation makes available annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, free of charge on or through its internet website at
www.firstbankpr.com,
10
(under the Investor Relations section), as soon as
reasonably practicable after the Corporation electronically
files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.
The Corporation also makes available the Corporations
corporate governance guidelines, the charters of the audit,
asset/liability, compensation and benefits, credit, strategic
planning, corporate governance and nominating committees and the
codes and principles mentioned below, free of charge on or
through its internet website at www.firstbankpr.com
(under the Investor Relations section):
|
|
|
|
|
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
|
|
|
|
Code of Ethics applicable to all employees
|
|
|
|
Independence Principles for Directors
|
The corporate governance guidelines, and the aforementioned
charters and codes may also be obtained free of charge by
sending a written request to Mr. Lawrence Odell, Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, PO Box 9146,
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908.
The public may read and copy any materials First BanCorp files
with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. In addition,
the public may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy,
and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at its website
(www.sec.gov).
MARKET
AREA AND COMPETITION
Puerto Rico, where the banking market is highly competitive, is
the main geographic service area of the Corporation. As of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation also had a presence in
the state of Florida and in the United States and British Virgin
Islands. Puerto Rico banks are subject to the same federal laws,
regulations and supervision that apply to similar institutions
in the United States mainland.
Competitors include other banks, insurance companies, mortgage
banking companies, small loan companies, automobile financing
companies, leasing companies, brokerage firms with retail
operations, and credit unions in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands
and the state of Florida. The Corporations businesses
compete with these other firms with respect to the range of
products and services offered and the types of clients,
customers, and industries served.
The Corporations ability to compete effectively depends on
the relative performance of its products, the degree to which
the features of its products appeal to customers, and the extent
to which the Corporation meets clients needs and
expectations. The Corporations ability to compete also
depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and
other personnel, and on its reputation.
The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and
retaining deposits and its consumer and commercial lending
activities. The Corporation competes for loans with other
financial institutions, some of which are larger and have
greater resources available than those of the Corporation.
Management believes that the Corporation has been able to
compete effectively for deposits and loans by offering a variety
of transaction account products and loans with competitive
features, by pricing its products at competitive interest rates,
by offering convenient branch locations, and by emphasizing the
quality of its service. The Corporations ability to
originate loans depends primarily on the rates and fees charged
and the service it provides to its borrowers in making prompt
credit decisions. There can be no assurance that in the future
the Corporation will be able to continue to increase its deposit
base or originate loans in the manner or on the terms on which
it has done so in the past.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
Recent
Events affecting the Corporation
Events since early 2008 affecting the financial services
industry and, more generally, the financial markets and the
economy as a whole, have led to various proposals for changes in
the regulation of the financial
11
services industry. In 2009, the House of Representatives passed
the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009,
which, among other things, calls for the establishment of a
Consumer Financial Protection Agency having broad authority to
regulate providers of credit, savings, payment and other
consumer financial products and services; creates a new
structure for resolving troubled or failed financial
institutions; requires certain
over-the-counter
derivative transactions to be cleared in a central clearinghouse
and/or
effected on the exchange; revises the assessment base for the
calculation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) assessments; and creates a structure to
regulate systemically important financial companies, including
providing regulators with the power to require such companies to
sell or transfer assets and terminate activities if they
determine that the size or scope of activities of the company
pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the company or the
financial stability of the United States. Other proposals have
been made, including additional capital and liquidity
requirements and limitations on size or types of activity in
which banks may engage. It is not clear at this time which of
these proposals will be finally enacted into law, or what form
they will take, or what new proposals may be made, as the debate
over financial reform continues in 2010. The description below
summarizes the current regulatory structure in which the
Corporation operates. In the event the regulatory structure
change significantly, the structure of the Corporation and the
products and services it offers could also change significantly
as a result.
Bank
Holding Company Activities and Other Limitations
The Corporation is subject to ongoing regulation, supervision,
and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and is required to
file with the Federal Reserve Board periodic and annual reports
and other information concerning its own business operations and
those of its subsidiaries. In addition, the Corporation is
subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended (Bank Holding Company Act). Under
the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding
company must obtain Federal Reserve Board approval before it
acquires direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5%
of the voting shares of another bank, or merges or consolidates
with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board
also has authority under certain circumstances to issue cease
and desist orders against bank holding companies and their
non-bank subsidiaries.
A bank holding company is prohibited under the Bank Holding
Company Act, with limited exceptions, from engaging, directly or
indirectly, in any business unrelated to the businesses of
banking or managing or controlling banks. One of the exceptions
to these prohibitions permits ownership by a bank holding
company of the shares of any corporation if the Federal Reserve
Board, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, by
regulation or order has determined that the activities of the
corporation in question are so closely related to the businesses
of banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper
incident thereto.
Under the Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company
such as the Corporation is expected to act as a source of
financial strength to its banking subsidiaries and to commit
support to them. This support may be required at times when,
absent such policy, the bank holding company might not otherwise
provide such support. In the event of a bank holding
companys bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding
company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain capital
of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee
and be entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, any
capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary
banks must be subordinated in right of payment to deposits and
to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. As of
December 31, 2009, FirstBank was the only depository
institution subsidiary of the Corporation.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act) revised and
expanded the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act by
including a section that permits a bank holding company to elect
to become a financial holding company and engage in a full range
of financial activities. In April 2000, the Corporation filed an
election with the Federal Reserve Board and became a financial
holding company under the GLB Act. The GLB Act requires a bank
holding company that elects to become a financial holding
company to file a written declaration with the appropriate
Federal Reserve Bank and comply with the following (and such
compliance must continue while the entity is treated as a
financial holding company): (i) state that the bank holding
company elects to become a financial holding company;
(ii) provide the name and head office address of the bank
holding company and each depository institution controlled by
the bank holding company; (iii) certify
12
that all depository institutions controlled by the bank holding
company are well-capitalized as of the date the bank holding
company files for the election; (iv) provide the capital
ratios for all relevant capital measures as of the close of the
previous quarter for each depository institution controlled by
the bank holding company; and (v) certify that all
depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company
are well-managed as of the date the bank holding company files
the election. All insured depository institutions controlled by
the bank holding company must have also achieved at least a
rating of satisfactory record of meeting community credit
needs under the Community Reinvestment Act during the
depository institutions most recent examination.
A financial holding company ceasing to meet these standards is
subject to a variety of restrictions, depending on the
circumstances. If the Federal Reserve Board determines that any
of the financial holding companys subsidiary depository
institutions are either not well-capitalized or not
well-managed, it must notify the financial holding company.
Until compliance is restored, the Federal Reserve Board has
broad discretion to impose appropriate limitations on the
financial holding companys activities. If compliance is
not restored within 180 days, the Federal Reserve Board may
ultimately require the financial holding company to divest its
depository institutions or in the alternative, to discontinue or
divest any activities that are permitted only to non-financial
holding company bank holding companies.
The potential restrictions are different if the lapse pertains
to the Community Reinvestment Act requirement. In that case,
until all the subsidiary institutions are restored to at least
satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating
status, the financial holding company may not engage, directly
or through a subsidiary, in any of the additional activities
permissible under the GLB Act or make additional acquisitions of
companies engaged in the additional activities. However,
completed acquisitions and additional activities and
affiliations previously begun are left undisturbed, as the GLB
Act does not require divestiture for this type of situation.
Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly,
in any activity that is determined to be (i) financial in
nature, (ii) incidental to such financial activity, or
(iii) complementary to a financial activity and does not
pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of
depository institutions or the financial system generally. The
GLB Act specifically provides that the following activities have
been determined to be financial in nature:
(a) lending, trust and other banking activities;
(b) insurance activities; (c) financial or economic
advice or services; (d) pooled investments;
(e) securities underwriting and dealing; (f) existing
bank holding company domestic activities; (g) existing bank
holding company foreign activities; and (h) merchant
banking activities. The Corporation offers insurance agency
services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, FirstBank
Insurance Agency and through First Insurance Agency V. I., Inc.,
a subsidiary of FirstBank. In association with JP Morgan Chase,
the Corporation, through FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, Inc.,
a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstBank, also offers municipal
bond underwriting services focused mainly on municipal and
government bonds or obligations issued by the Puerto Rico
government and its public corporations. Additionally, FirstBank
Puerto Rico Securities, Inc. offers financial advisory services.
In addition, the GLB Act specifically gives the Federal Reserve
Board the authority, by regulation or order, to expand the list
of financial or incidental activities,
but requires consultation with the Treasury, and gives the
Federal Reserve Board authority to allow a financial holding
company to engage in any activity that is
complementary to a financial activity and does not
pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of
depository institutions or the financial system generally.
Under the GLB Act, if the Corporation fails to meet any of the
requirements for being a financial holding company and is unable
to resolve such deficiencies within certain prescribed periods
of time, the Federal Reserve Board could require the Corporation
to divest control of one or more of its depository institution
subsidiaries or alternatively cease conducting financial
activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies
that are not financial holding companies.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOA) implemented a
range of corporate governance and accounting measures to
increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced
penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly
traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the
accuracy and reliability
13
of disclosures under federal securities laws. In addition, SOA
has established membership requirements and responsibilities for
the audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship
between the Corporation and external auditors, imposed
additional responsibilities for the external financial
statements on our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for corporate
insiders, required management to evaluate its disclosure
controls and procedures and its internal control over financial
reporting, and required the auditors to issue a report on the
internal control over financial reporting.
Since the 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
the Corporation has included in its annual report on
Form 10-K
its management assessment regarding the effectiveness of the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
The internal control report includes a statement of
managements responsibility for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
for the Corporation; managements assessment as to the
effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over
financial reporting based on managements evaluation, as of
year-end; and the framework used by management as criteria for
evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2009,
First BanCorps management concluded that its internal
control over financial reporting was effective. The
Corporations independent registered public accounting firm
reached the same conclusion.
Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 (the EESA) was signed into law. The EESA
authorized the Treasury to access up to $700 billion to
protect the U.S. economy and restore confidence and
stability to the financial markets. One such program under the
Treasury Departments Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
was action by Treasury to make significant investments in
U.S. financial institutions through the Capital Purchase
Program (CPP). The Treasurys stated purpose in
implementing the CPP was to improve the capitalization of
healthy institutions, which would improve the flow of credit to
businesses and consumers, and boost the confidence of
depositors, investors, and counterparties alike. All federal
banking and thrift regulatory agencies encouraged eligible
institutions to participate in the CPP.
The Corporation applied for, and the Treasury approved, a
capital purchase in the amount of $400,000,000. The Corporation
entered into a Letter Agreement with the Treasury, pursuant to
which the Corporation issued and sold to the Treasury for an
aggregate purchase price of $400,000,000 in cash
(i) 400,000 shares of the Series F Preferred
Stock, and (2) the Warrant to purchase
5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common stock at
an exercise price of $10.27 per share, subject to certain
anti-dilution and other adjustments. The TARP transaction closed
on January 16, 2009.
Under the terms of the Letter Agreement with the Treasury,
(i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus,
incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements
(including severance and employment agreements) to the extent
necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation
and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of
the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable
guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of Treasury on
or prior to January 16, 2009 and (ii) each Senior
Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement,
executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Corporation
from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a
result the Corporations amendment of such arrangements and
agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until
such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity
securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, the Corporation must maintain compliance with these
requirements.
American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
On February 17, 2009, the Congress enacted the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Stimulus
Act). The Stimulus Act includes federal tax cuts,
expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare
provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and
infrastructure, including energy sector. The Stimulus Act
includes new provisions relating to compensation paid by
institutions that receive government assistance under TARP,
including institutions that have already received such
assistance, effectively amending the existing compensation and
corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the
EESA. The provisions include restrictions on the amounts and
forms of compensation payable, provision
14
for possible reimbursement of previously paid compensation and a
requirement that compensation be submitted to non-binding
say on pay shareholders votes.
On June 10, 2009, the Treasury issued regulations
implementing the compensation requirements under ARRA, which
amended the requirements of EESA. The regulations became
applicable to existing and new TARP recipients upon publication
in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. The regulations
make effective the compensation provisions of ARRA and include
rules requiring: (i) review of prior compensation by a
Special Master; (ii) restrictions on paying or accruing
bonuses, retention awards or incentive compensation for certain
employees; (iii) regular review of all employee
compensation arrangements by the companys senior risk
officer and compensation committee to ensure that the
arrangements do not encourage unnecessary and excessive
risk-taking or manipulation of reporting earnings;
(iv) recoupment of bonus payments based on materially
inaccurate information; (v) prohibition on severance or
change in control payments for certain employees;
(vi) adoption of policies and procedures to avoid excessive
luxury expenses; and (vii) mandatory say on pay
votes (which was effective beginning in February 2009). In
addition, the regulations also introduce several additional
requirements and restrictions, including: (i) Special
Master review of ongoing compensation in certain situations;
(ii) prohibition on tax
gross-ups
for certain employees; (iii) disclosure of perquisites; and
(iv) disclosure regarding compensation consultants.
Homeowner
Affordability and Stability Plan
On February 18, 2009, President Obama announced a
comprehensive plan to help responsible homeowners avoid
foreclosure by providing affordable and sustainable mortgage
loans. The Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, a
$75 billion federal program, provides for a sweeping loan
modification program targeted at borrowers who are at risk of
foreclosure because their incomes are not sufficient to make
their mortgage payments. It also includes refinancing
opportunities for borrowers who are current on their mortgage
payments but have been unable to refinance because their homes
have decreased in value. Under the Homeowner Stability
Initiative, Treasury will spend up to $50 billion dollars
to make mortgage payments affordable and sustainable for
middle-income American families that are at risk of foreclosure.
Borrowers who are delinquent on the mortgage for their primary
residence and borrowers who, due to a loss of income or increase
in expenses, are struggling to keep their payments current may
be eligible for a loan modification. Under the Homeowner
Affordability and Stability Plan, borrowers who are current on
their mortgage but have been unable to refinance because their
house has decreased in value may have the opportunity to
refinance into a
30-year,
fixed-rate loan. Through the program, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
will allow the refinancing of mortgage loans that they hold in
their portfolios or that they guarantee in their own
mortgage-backed securities. Lenders were able to begin accepting
refinancing applications on March 4, 2009. The Obama
Administration announced on March 4, 2009 the new
U.S. Department of the Treasury guidelines to enable
servicers to begin modifications of eligible mortgages under the
Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan. The guidelines
implement financial incentives for mortgage lenders to modify
existing first mortgages and sets standard industry practice for
modifications.
Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program
The FDIC adopted the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
(TLGP) in October 2008 following a determination of
systemic risk by the Secretary of the Treasury (after
consultation with the President) that was supported by
recommendations from the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. The TLGP is part of a coordinated effort
by the FDIC, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve System to
address unprecedented disruptions in the credit markets and the
resultant difficulty of many financial institutions to obtain
funds and to make loans to creditworthy borrowers. On
October 23, 2008, the FDICs Board of Directors
(Board) authorized the publication in the Federal Register of an
interim rule that outlined the structure of the TLGP. The
interim rule was finalized and a final rule was published in the
Federal Register on November 26, 2008. Designed to assist
in the stabilization of the nations financial system, the
FDICs TLGP is composed of two distinct components: the
Debt Guarantee Program (DGP) and the Transaction
Account Guarantee Program (TAG program). Under the
DGP, the FDIC guarantees certain senior unsecured debt issued by
participating entities. Under the TAG program, the FDIC
guarantees all funds held in qualifying
15
noninterest-bearing transaction accounts at participating
insured depository institutions (IDIs). The DGP
initially permitted participating entities to issue
FDIC-guaranteed senior unsecured debt until June 30, 2009,
with the FDICs guarantee for such debt to expire on the
earlier of the maturity of the debt (or the conversion date, for
mandatory convertible debt) or June 30, 2012. To reduce the
potential for market disruptions at the conclusion of the DGP
and to begin the orderly phase-out of the program, on
May 29, 2009 the Board issued a final rule that extended
for four months the period during which certain participating
entities could issue FDIC-guaranteed debt. All IDIs and those
other participating entities that had issued FDIC-guaranteed
debt on or before April 1, 2009 were permitted to
participate in the extended DGP without application to the FDIC.
Other participating entities that received approval from the
FDIC also were permitted to participate in the extended DGP. The
expiration of the guarantee period was also extended from
June 30, 2012 to December 31, 2012. As a result, all
such participating entities were permitted to issue
FDIC-guaranteed debt through and including October 31,
2009, with the FDICs guarantee expiring on the earliest of
the debts mandatory conversion date (for mandatory
convertible debt), the stated maturity date, or
December 31, 2012.
On October 20, 2009, the FDIC established a limited,
six-month emergency guarantee facility upon expiration of the
DGP. Under this emergency guarantee facility, certain
participating entities can apply to the FDIC for permission to
issue FDIC-guaranteed debt during the period starting
October 31, 2009 through April 30, 2010. The fee for
issuing debt under the emergency facility will be at least
300 basis points, which the FDIC reserves the right to
increase on a
case-by-case
basis, depending upon the risks presented by the issuing entity.
The TAG Program has been extended until June 30, 2010. The
cost of participating in the program increased after
December 31, 2009. Separately, Congress extended the
temporary increase in the standard coverage limit to $250,000
until December 31, 2013. FirstBank currently participates
in the TLGP solely through the TAG program.
USA
Patriot Act
Under Title III of the USA Patriot Act, also known as the
International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism
Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions are required
to, among other things, identify their customers, adopt formal
and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or
prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and
be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law
enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their
transactions. Presently, only certain types of financial
institutions (including banks, savings associations and money
services businesses) are subject to final rules implementing the
anti-money laundering program requirements of the USA Patriot
Act.
Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA
Patriot Acts requirements could have serious legal and
reputational consequences for the institutions. The Corporation
has adopted appropriate policies, procedures and controls to
address compliance with the USA Patriot Act and Treasury
regulations.
Privacy
Policies
Under Title V of the GLB Act, all financial institutions
are required to adopt privacy policies, restrict the sharing of
nonpublic customer data with parties at the customers
request and establish policies and procedures to protect
customer data from unauthorized access. The Corporation and its
subsidiaries have adopted policies and procedures in order to
comply with the privacy provisions of the GLB Act and the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003 and the regulations
issued thereunder.
State
Chartered Non-Member Bank and Banking Laws and Regulations in
General
FirstBank is subject to regulation and examination by the OCIF
and the FDIC, and is subject to certain requirements established
by the Federal Reserve Board. The federal and state laws and
regulations which are applicable to banks regulate, among other
things, the scope of their businesses, their investments, their
reserves against deposits, the timing and availability of
deposited funds, and the nature and amount of and collateral for
certain loans. In addition to the impact of regulations,
commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of
the Federal Reserve Board as it attempts to control the money
supply and credit availability in order to influence the
economy. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve Board
to implement these
16
objectives are open market operations in U.S. government
securities, adjustments of the discount rate, and changes in
reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments
are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic
growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments
and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on
loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies and regulations
of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on
the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are
expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such
policies upon our future business, earnings, and growth cannot
be predicted.
References herein to applicable statutes or regulations are
brief summaries of portions thereof which do not purport to be
complete and which are qualified in their entirety by reference
to those statutes and regulations. Any change in applicable laws
or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the
business of commercial banks, and bank holding companies,
including FirstBank and the Corporation.
As a creditor and financial institution, FirstBank is subject to
certain regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board,
including, without limitation, Regulation B (Equal Credit
Opportunity Act), Regulation DD (Truth in Savings Act),
Regulation E (Electronic Funds Transfer Act),
Regulation F (Limits on Exposure to Other Banks),
Regulation O (Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and
Principal Shareholders), Regulation W (Transactions Between
Member Banks and Their Affiliates), Regulation Z (Truth in
Lending Act), Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability
Act), Regulation X (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act),
Regulation BB (Community Reinvestment Act) and
Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure Act).
During 2008, federal agencies adopted revisions to several rules
and regulations that will impact lenders and secondary market
activities. In 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank revised
Regulation Z, adopted under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA)
and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), by
adopting a final rule which prohibits unfair, abusive or
deceptive home mortgage lending practices and restricts certain
mortgage lending practices. The final rule also establishes
advertisement standards and requires certain mortgage
disclosures to be given to the consumers earlier in the
transaction. The rule was effective in October 2009. The final
rule regarding the TILA also includes amendments revising
disclosures in connection with credit cards accounts and other
revolving credit plans to ensure that information provided to
customers is provided in a timely manner and in a form that is
readily understandable.
There are periodic examinations by the OCIF and the FDIC of
FirstBank to test the Banks compliance with various
statutory and regulatory requirements. This regulation and
supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities
in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for
the protection of the FDICs insurance fund and depositors.
The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities
discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement
activities and examination policies, including policies with
respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of
adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. This
enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability
to assess civil money penalties, to issue
cease-and-desist
or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against
banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In
general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for
violations of laws and regulations and for engaging in unsafe or
unsound practices. In addition, certain bank actions are
required by statute and implementing regulations. Other actions
or failure to act may provide the basis for enforcement action,
including the filing of misleading or untimely reports with
regulatory authorities.
Dividend
Restrictions
The Corporation is subject to certain restrictions generally
imposed on Puerto Rico corporations with respect to the
declaration and payment of dividends (i.e., that dividends may
be paid out only from the Corporations net assets in
excess of capital or, in the absence of such excess, from the
Corporations net earnings for such fiscal year
and/or the
preceding fiscal year). The Federal Reserve Board has also
issued a policy statement that as a matter of prudent banking, a
bank holding company should generally not maintain a given rate
of cash dividends unless its net income available to common
shareholders has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends and
the prospective rate of earnings retention appears to be
consistent with the organizations capital needs, asset
quality, and overall financial condition.
17
On February 24, 2009, the Federal Reserve published the
Applying Supervisory Guidance and Regulations on the
Payment of Dividends, Stock Redemptions, and Stock Repurchases
at Bank Holding Companies (the Supervisory
Letter) which discusses the ability of bank holding
companies to declare dividends and to redeem or repurchase
equity securities. The Supervisory Letter is generally
consistent with prior Federal Reserve supervisory policies and
guidance, although places greater emphasis on discussions with
the regulators prior to dividend declarations and redemption or
repurchase decisions even when not explicitly required by the
regulations. The Federal Reserve provides that the principles
discussed in the letter are applicable to all bank holding
companies, but are especially relevant for bank holding
companies that are either experiencing financial difficulties
and/or
receiving public funds under the Treasurys TARP Capital
Purchase Program. To that end, the Supervisory Letter
specifically addresses the Federal Reserves supervisory
considerations for TARP participants.
The Supervisory Letter provides that a board of directors should
eliminate, defer, or severely limit dividends if:
(i) the bank holding companys net income available to
shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends paid
during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the
dividends; (ii) the bank holding companys rate of
earnings retention is inconsistent with capital needs and
overall macroeconomic outlook; or (iii) the bank holding
company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its
minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The Supervisory
Letter further suggests that bank holding companies should
inform the Federal Reserve in advance of paying a dividend that:
(i) exceeds the earnings for the quarter in which the
dividend is being paid; or (ii) could result in a material
adverse change to the organizations capital structure.
As of December 31, 2009, the principal source of funds for
the Corporations parent holding company is dividends
declared and paid by its subsidiary, FirstBank. The ability of
FirstBank to declare and pay dividends on its capital stock is
regulated by the Puerto Rico Banking Law, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (the FDIA), and FDIC regulations. In
general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when
the expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess
of expenditures over receipts shall be charged against
undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall
be charged against the required reserve fund of the bank. If the
reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or
in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the
banks capital account. The Puerto Rico Banking Law
provides that, until said capital has been restored to its
original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original
capital, the bank may not declare any dividends.
In general terms, the FDIA and the FDIC regulations restrict the
payment of dividends when a bank is undercapitalized, when a
bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when there are
safety and soundness concerns regarding such bank.
In addition, the Purchase Agreement entered into with the
Treasury contains limitations on the payment of dividends on
common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash
dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash
dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if
lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is
$0.07 per share. Also, upon issuance of the Series F
Preferred Stock, the ability of the Corporation to purchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its
common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred securities is
subject to restrictions, including limitations when the
Corporation has not paid dividends. These restrictions will
terminate on the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of
the closing date of the issuance of the Series F Preferred
Stock and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred
Stock has been redeemed in whole or Treasury has transferred all
of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are
not affiliates of Treasury. The restrictions described in this
paragraph are set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that
the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the
common and preferred dividends, including the TARP preferred
dividends, effective with the preferred dividend payments for
the month of August 2009.
18
Limitations
on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
Certain transactions between financial institutions such as
FirstBank and its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A
and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and by Regulation W. An
affiliate of a financial institution is any corporation or
entity, that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with the financial institution. In a holding company
context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which
are controlled by such parent bank holding company are
affiliates of the financial institution. Generally,
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act
(i) limit the extent to which the financial institution or
its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions
(defined below) with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10%
of such financial institutions capital stock and surplus,
and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all
affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such financial
institutions capital stock and surplus and
(ii) require that all covered transactions be
on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the
financial institution or affiliate, as those provided to a
non-affiliate. The term covered transaction includes
the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee
and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other
extensions of credit by the financial institution to the
affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with
the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act.
The GLB Act requires that financial subsidiaries of banks be
treated as affiliates for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B
of the Federal Reserve Act, but (i) the 10% capital
limitation on transactions between the bank and such financial
subsidiary as an affiliate is not applicable, and
(ii) notwithstanding other provisions in Sections 23A
and 23B, the investment by the bank in the financial subsidiary
does not include retained earnings of the financial subsidiary.
The GLB Act provides that: (1) any purchase of, or
investment in, the securities of a financial subsidiary by any
affiliate of the parent bank is considered a purchase or
investment by the bank; and (2) if the Federal Reserve
Board determines that such treatment is necessary, any loan made
by an affiliate of the parent bank to the financial subsidiary
is to be considered a loan made by the parent bank.
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted Regulation W which
interprets the provisions of Sections 23A and 23B. The
regulation unifies and updates staff interpretations issued over
the years, incorporates several new interpretations and
provisions (such as to clarify when transactions with an
unrelated third party will be attributable to an affiliate), and
addresses new issues arising as a result of the expanded scope
of nonbanking activities engaged in by banks and bank holding
companies in recent years and authorized for financial holding
companies under the GLB Act.
In addition, Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal
Reserve Act, implemented through Regulation O, place
restrictions on loans to executive officers, directors, and
principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer, a
greater than 10% stockholder of a financial institution, and
certain related interests of these, may not exceed, together
with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated
interests, the financial institutions loans to one
borrower limit, generally equal to 15% of the institutions
unimpaired capital and surplus. Section 22(h) of the
Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors,
executive officers, and principal stockholders be made on terms
substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to
other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain
loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit
by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the
institutions unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore,
Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional
restrictions on loans to executive officers.
Federal
Reserve Board Capital Requirements
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted capital adequacy
guidelines pursuant to which it assesses the adequacy of capital
in examining and supervising a bank holding company and in
analyzing applications to it under the Bank Holding Company Act.
The Federal Reserve Board capital adequacy guidelines generally
require bank holding companies to maintain total capital equal
to 8% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least one-half of
that amount consisting of Tier I or core capital and up to
one-half of that amount consisting of Tier II or
supplementary capital. Tier I capital for bank holding
companies generally consists of the sum of
19
common stockholders equity and perpetual preferred stock,
subject in the case of the latter to limitations on the kind and
amount of such perpetual preferred stock that may be included as
Tier I capital, less goodwill and, with certain exceptions,
other intangibles. Tier II capital generally consists of
hybrid capital instruments, perpetual preferred stock that is
not eligible to be included as Tier I capital, term
subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock and,
subject to limitations, allowances for loan losses. Assets are
adjusted under the risk-based guidelines to take into account
different risk characteristics, with the categories ranging from
0% (requiring no additional capital) for assets such as cash to
100% for the bulk of assets, which are typically held by a bank
holding company, including multi-family residential and
commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and
commercial loans. Off-balance sheet items also are adjusted to
take into account certain risk characteristics.
The federal bank regulatory agencies risk-based capital
guidelines for years have been based upon the 1988 capital
accord (Basel I) of the Basel Committee, a committee
of central bankers and bank supervisors from the major
industrialized countries. This body develops broad policy
guidelines for use by each countrys supervisors in
determining the supervisory policies they apply. In 2004, it
proposed a new capital adequacy framework (Basel II)
for large, internationally active banking organizations to
replace Basel I. Basel II was designed to produce a more
risk-sensitive result than its predecessor. However, certain
portions of Basel II entail complexities and costs that
were expected to preclude their practical application to the
majority of U.S. banking organizations that lack the
economies of scale needed to absorb the associated expenses.
Effective April 1, 2008, the U.S. federal bank
regulatory agencies adopted Basel II for application to
certain banking organizations in the United States. The new
capital adequacy framework applies to organizations that:
(i) have consolidated assets of at least $250 billion;
or (ii) have consolidated total on-balance sheet foreign
exposures of at least $10 billion; or (iii) are
eligible to, and elect to, opt-in to the new framework even
though not required to do so under clause (i) or
(ii) above; or (iv) as a general matter, are
subsidiaries of a bank or bank holding company that uses the new
rule. During a two-year phase in period, organizations required
or electing to apply Basel II will report their capital
adequacy calculations separately under both Basel I and
Basel II on a parallel run basis. Given the
high thresholds noted above, FirstBank is not required to apply
Basel II and does not expect to apply it in the foreseeable
future.
On January 21, 2010, the federal banking agencies,
including the Federal Reserve Board, issued a final risk-based
regulatory capital rule related to the Financial Accounting
Standards Boards adoption of amendments to the accounting
requirements relating to transfers of financial assets and
variable interests in variable interest entities. These
accounting standards make substantive changes to how banks
account for securitized assets that are currently excluded from
their balance sheets as of the beginning of the
Corporations 2010 fiscal year. The final regulatory
capital rule seeks to better align regulatory capital
requirements with actual risks. Under the final rule, banks
affected by the new accounting requirements generally will be
subject to higher minimum regulatory capital requirements.
The final rule permits banks to include without limit in
tier 2 capital any increase in the allowance for lease and
loan losses calculated as of the implementation date that is
attributable to assets consolidated under the requirements of
the variable interests accounting requirements. The rule
provides an optional delay and phase-in for a maximum of one
year for the effect on risk-based capital and the allowance for
lease and loan losses related to the assets that must be
consolidated as a result of the accounting change. The final
rule also eliminates the risk-based capital exemption for
asset-backed commercial paper assets. The transitional relief
does not apply to the leverage ratio or to assets in conduits to
which a bank provides implicit support. Banks will be required
to rebuild capital and repair balance sheets to accommodate the
new accounting standards by the middle of 2011.
Deposit
Insurance
Under current FDIC regulations, each depository institution is
assigned to a risk category based on capital and supervisory
measures. In 2009, the FDIC revised the method for calculating
the assessment rate for depository institutions by introducing
several adjustments to an institutions initial base
assessment rate. A depository institution is assessed premiums
by the FDIC based on its risk category as adjusted and the
amount
20
of deposits held. Higher levels of banks failures over the past
two years have dramatically increased resolution costs of the
FDIC and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the
amount of FDIC insurance coverage for insured deposits has been
increased generally from $100,000 per depositor to $250,000 per
depositor. In light of the increased stress on the deposit
insurance fund caused by these developments, and in order to
maintain a strong funding position and restore the reserve
ratios of the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC: (i) imposed
a special assessment in June, 2009, (ii) increased
assessment rates of insured institutions generally, and
(iii) required them to prepay on December 30, 2009 the
premiums that are expected to become due over the next three
years. FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such
prepayment.
FDIC
Capital Requirements
The FDIC has promulgated regulations and a statement of policy
regarding the capital adequacy of state-chartered non-member
banks like FirstBank. These requirements are substantially
similar to those adopted by the Federal Reserve Board regarding
bank holding companies, as described above.
The regulators require that banks meet a risk-based capital
standard. The risk-based capital standard for banks requires the
maintenance of total capital (which is defined as Tier I
capital and supplementary (Tier 2) capital) to
risk-weighted assets of 8%. In determining the amount of
risk-weighted assets, weights used (ranging from 0% to 100%) are
based on the risks inherent in the type of asset or item. The
components of Tier I capital are equivalent to those
discussed below under the 3.0% leverage capital standard. The
components of supplementary capital include certain perpetual
preferred stock, mandatorily convertible securities,
subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock and,
generally, allowances for loan and lease losses. Allowance for
loan and lease losses includable in supplementary capital is
limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Overall,
the amount of capital counted toward supplementary capital
cannot exceed 100% of core capital.
The capital regulations of the FDIC establish a minimum 3.0%
Tier I capital to total assets requirement for the most
highly-rated state-chartered, non-member banks, with an
additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points for
all other state-chartered, non-member banks, which effectively
will increase the minimum Tier I leverage ratio for such
other banks from 4.0% to 5.0% or more. Under these regulations,
the highest-rated banks are those that are not anticipating or
experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk,
including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset
quality, high liquidity and good earnings and, in general, are
considered a strong banking organization and are rated composite
I under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System.
Leverage or core capital is defined as the sum of common
stockholders equity including retained earnings,
non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus,
and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, minus all
intangible assets other than certain qualifying supervisory
goodwill and certain purchased mortgage servicing rights.
In August 1995, the FDIC published a final rule modifying its
existing risk-based capital standards to provide for
consideration of interest rate risk when assessing the capital
adequacy of a bank. Under the final rule, the FDIC must
explicitly include a banks exposure to declines in the
economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates
as a factor in evaluating a banks capital adequacy. In
June 1996, the FDIC adopted a joint policy statement on interest
rate risk. Because market conditions, bank structure, and bank
activities vary, the agency concluded that each bank needs to
develop its own interest rate risk management program tailored
to its needs and circumstances. The policy statement describes
prudent principles and practices that are fundamental to sound
interest rate risk management, including appropriate board and
senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk management
process that effectively identifies, measures, monitors and
controls such interest rate risk.
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject an insured bank
to a variety of prompt corrective actions and enforcement
remedies under the FDIA (as amended by Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), and
the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act
of 1994, including, with respect to an insured bank, the
termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and certain
restrictions on its business.
21
Under certain circumstances, a well-capitalized, adequately
capitalized or undercapitalized institution may be treated as if
the institution were in the next lower capital category. A
depository institution is generally prohibited from making
capital distributions (including paying dividends), or paying
management fees to a holding company if the institution would
thereafter be undercapitalized. Institutions that are adequately
capitalized but not well-capitalized cannot accept, renew or
roll over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC
and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can
be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions may not
accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits.
The federal bank regulatory agencies are permitted or, in
certain cases, required to take certain actions with respect to
institutions falling within one of the three undercapitalized
categories. Depending on the level of an institutions
capital, the agencys corrective powers include, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
prohibiting the payment of principal and interest on
subordinated debt;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting the holding company from making distributions
without prior regulatory approval;
|
|
|
|
placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities;
|
|
|
|
placing additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on
deposits;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from
correspondent banks; and
|
|
|
|
in the most severe cases, appointing a conservator or receiver
for the institution.
|
A banking institution that is undercapitalized is required to
submit a capital restoration plan, and such a plan will not be
accepted unless, among other things, the banking
institutions holding company guarantees the plan up to a
certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository
institutions holding company is entitled to a priority of
payment in bankruptcy.
As of December 31, 2009, FirstBank was well-capitalized. A
banks capital category, as determined by applying the
prompt corrective action provisions of law, however, may not
constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial
condition or prospects of the Bank, and should be considered in
conjunction with other available information regarding financial
condition and results of operations.
Set forth below are the Corporations, FirstBanks
capital ratios as of December 31, 2009, based on Federal
Reserve and FDIC guidelines, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
First Bank
|
|
Minimum
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
12.87
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
|
11.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Leverage ratio(1)
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets. |
Activities
and Investments
The activities as principal and equity investments
of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks such as FirstBank are
generally limited to those that are permissible for national
banks. Under regulations dealing with equity investments, an
insured state-chartered bank generally may not directly or
indirectly acquire or retain any equity investments of a type,
or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System
FirstBank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
system. The FHLB system consists of twelve regional Federal Home
Loan Banks governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
22
The Federal Home Loan Banks serve as reserve or credit
facilities for member institutions within their assigned
regions. They are funded primarily from proceeds derived from
the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system, and
they make loans (advances) to members in accordance with
policies and procedures established by the FHLB system and the
board of directors of each regional FHLB.
FirstBank is a member of the FHLB of New York (FHLB-NY) and as
such is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in
that FHLB for a certain amount, which is calculated in
accordance with the requirements set forth in applicable laws
and regulations. FirstBank is in compliance with the stock
ownership requirements of the FHLB-NY. All loans, advances and
other extensions of credit made by the FHLB-NY to FirstBank are
secured by a portion of FirstBanks mortgage loan
portfolio, certain other investments and the capital stock of
the FHLB-NY held by FirstBank.
Ownership
and Control
Because of FirstBanks status as an FDIC-insured bank, as
defined in the Bank Holding Company Act, First BanCorp, as the
owner of FirstBanks common stock, is subject to certain
restrictions and disclosure obligations under various federal
laws, including the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in
Bank Control Act (the CBCA). Regulations pursuant to
the Bank Holding Company Act generally require prior Federal
Reserve Board approval for an acquisition of control of an
insured institution (as defined in the Act) or holding company
thereof by any person (or persons acting in concert). Control is
deemed to exist if, among other things, a person (or persons
acting in concert) acquires more than 25% of any class of voting
stock of an insured institution or holding company thereof.
Under the CBCA, control is presumed to exist subject to rebuttal
if a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than
10% of any class of voting stock and either (i) the
corporation has registered securities under Section 12 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (ii) no person will
own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of
that class of voting securities immediately after the
transaction. The concept of acting in concert is very broad and
also is subject to certain rebuttable presumptions, including
among others, that relatives, business partners, management
officials, affiliates and others are presumed to be acting in
concert with each other and their businesses. The regulations of
the FDIC implementing the CBCA are generally similar to those
described above.
The Puerto Rico Banking Law requires the approval of the OCIF
for changes in control of a Puerto Rico bank. See Puerto
Rico Banking Law.
Standards
for Safety and Soundness
The FDIA, as amended by FDICIA and the Riegle Community
Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, requires the
FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe
standards of safety and soundness, by regulations or guidelines,
relating generally to operations and management, asset growth,
asset quality, earnings, stock valuation, and compensation. The
FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies adopted,
effective August 9, 1995, a set of guidelines prescribing
safety and soundness standards pursuant to FDIA, as amended. The
guidelines establish general standards relating to internal
controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure,
asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. In general,
the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems
and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures
specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive
compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe
compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable
or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive
officer, employee, director or principal shareholder.
Brokered
Deposits
FDIC regulations adopted under the FDIA govern the receipt of
brokered deposits by banks.
Well-capitalized
institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered
deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to
accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver
from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the
interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions
are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of
December 31, 2009, FirstBank was a well-capitalized
institution
23
and was therefore not subject to these limitations on brokered
deposits. The FDIC and other bank regulators may also exercise
regulatory discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of
brokered deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as
to an over reliance on such funding.
Puerto
Rico Banking Law
As a commercial bank organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth, FirstBank is subject to supervision, examination
and regulation by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Commissioner
of Financial Institutions (Commissioner) pursuant to
the Puerto Rico Banking Law of 1933, as amended (the
Banking Law). The Banking Law contains provisions
governing the incorporation and organization, rights and
responsibilities of directors, officers and stockholders as well
as the corporate powers, lending limitations, capital
requirements, investment requirements and other aspects of
FirstBank and its affairs. In addition, the Commissioner is
given extensive rule-making power and administrative discretion
under the Banking Law.
The Banking Law authorizes Puerto Rico commercial banks to
conduct certain financial and related activities directly or
through subsidiaries, including the leasing of personal property
and the operation of a small loan business.
The Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve
which shall not be less than twenty percent (20%) of its demand
liabilities, except government deposits (federal, state and
municipal) that are secured by actual collateral. The reserve is
required to be composed of any of the following securities or
combination thereof: (1) legal tender of the United States;
(2) checks on banks or trust companies located in any part
of Puerto Rico that are to be presented for collection during
the day following the day on which they are received;
(3) money deposited in other banks provided said deposits
are authorized by the Commissioner, subject to immediate
collection; (4) federal funds sold to any Federal Reserve
Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell
executed by the bank with such funds that are subject to be
repaid to the bank on or before the close of the next business
day; and (5) any other asset that the Commissioner
identifies from time to time.
The Banking Law permits Puerto Rico commercial banks to make
loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to
an aggregate amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of:
(i) the banks paid-in capital; (ii) the
banks reserve fund; (iii) 50% of the banks
retained earnings; subject to certain limitations; and
(iv) any other components that the Commissioner may
determine from time to time. If such loans are secured by
collateral worth at least twenty five percent (25%) more than
the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount may reach
one third (33.33%) of the sum of the banks paid-in
capital, reserve fund, 50% of retained earnings and such other
components that the Commissioner may determine from time to
time. There are no restrictions under the Banking Law on the
amount of loans that are wholly secured by bonds, securities and
other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the United
States, or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or by bonds, not
in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The revised classification of the
mortgage-related transactions as secured commercial loans to
local financial institutions described in the Corporations
restatement of previously issued financial statements
(Form 10-K/A
2004) caused the mortgage-related transactions to be
treated as two secured commercial loans in excess of the lending
limitations imposed by the Banking Law. In this regard,
FirstBank received a ruling from the Commissioner that results
in FirstBank being considered in continued compliance with the
lending limitations. The Puerto Rico Banking Law authorizes the
Commissioner to determine other components which may be
considered for purposes of establishing its lending limit, which
components may lie outside the traditional elements mentioned in
Section 17. After consideration of other components, the
Commissioner authorized the Corporation to retain the secured
loans to the two financial institutions as it believed that
these loans were secured by sufficient collateral to diversify,
disperse and significantly diffuse the risks connected to such
loans thereby satisfying the safety and soundness considerations
mandated by Section 28 of the Banking Law. In July 2009,
FirstBank entered into a transaction with one of the
institutions to purchase $205 million in mortgage loans
that served as collateral to the loan to this institution.
The Banking Law prohibits Puerto Rico commercial banks from
making loans secured by their own stock, and from purchasing
their own stock, unless such purchase is made pursuant to a
stock repurchase
24
program approved by the Commissioner or is necessary to prevent
losses because of a debt previously contracted in good faith.
The stock purchased by the Puerto Rico commercial bank must be
sold by the bank in a public or private sale within one year
from the date of purchase.
The Banking Law provides that no officers, directors, agents or
employees of a Puerto Rico commercial bank may serve as an
officer, director, agent or employee of another Puerto Rico
commercial bank, financial corporation, savings and loan
association, trust corporation, corporation engaged in granting
mortgage loans or any other institution engaged in the money
lending business in Puerto Rico. This prohibition is not
applicable to the affiliates of a Puerto Rico commercial bank.
The Banking Law requires that Puerto Rico commercial banks
prepare each year a balance summary of their operations, and
submit such balance summary for approval at a regular meeting of
stockholders, together with an explanatory report thereon. The
Banking Law also requires that at least ten percent (10%) of the
yearly net income of a Puerto Rico commercial bank be credited
annually to a reserve fund. This credit is required to be done
every year until such reserve fund shall be equal to the total
paid-in-capital
of the bank.
The Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a
Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than receipts, the
excess of the expenditures over receipts shall be charged
against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance,
if any, shall be charged against the reserve fund, as a
reduction thereof. If there is no reserve fund sufficient to
cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount
shall be charged against the capital account and no dividend
shall be declared until said capital has been restored to its
original amount and the reserve fund to twenty percent (20%) of
the original capital.
The Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner
with respect to a transfer of capital stock of a bank that
results in a change of control of the bank. Under the Banking
Law, a change of control is presumed to occur if a person or a
group of persons acting in concert, directly or indirectly,
acquire more than 5% of the outstanding voting capital stock of
the bank. The Commissioner has interpreted the restrictions of
the Banking Law as applying to acquisitions of voting securities
of entities controlling a bank, such as a bank holding company.
Under the Banking Law, the determination of the Commissioner
whether to approve a change of control filing is final and
non-appealable.
The Finance Board, which is composed of the Commissioner, the
Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the
Secretary of Consumer Affairs, the President of the Economic
Development Bank, the President of the Government Development
Bank, and the President of the Planning Board, has the authority
to regulate the maximum interest rates and finance charges that
may be charged on loans to individuals and unincorporated
businesses in Puerto Rico. The current regulations of the
Finance Board provide that the applicable interest rate on loans
to individuals and unincorporated businesses, including real
estate development loans but excluding certain other personal
and commercial loans secured by mortgages on real estate
properties, is to be determined by free competition.
Accordingly, the regulations do not set a maximum rate for
charges on retail installment sales contracts, small loans, and
credit card purchases and set aside previous regulations which
regulated these maximum finance charges. Furthermore, there is
no maximum rate set for installment sales contracts involving
motor vehicles, commercial, agricultural and industrial
equipment, commercial electric appliances and insurance premiums.
International
Banking Act of Puerto Rico (IBE Act)
The business and operations of First BanCorp Overseas
(First BanCorp IBE, the IBE division of First
BanCorp), FirstBank International Branch (FirstBank
IBE, the IBE division of FirstBank) and FirstBank Overseas
Corporation (the IBE subsidiary of FirstBank) are subject to
supervision and regulation by the Commissioner. Under the IBE
Act, certain sales, encumbrances, assignments, mergers,
exchanges or transfers of shares, interests or participation(s)
in the capital of an international banking entity (an
IBE) may not be initiated without the prior approval
of the Commissioner. The IBE Act and the regulations issued
thereunder by the Commissioner (the IBE Regulations)
limit the business activities that may be carried out by an IBE.
Such activities are limited in part to persons and assets
located outside of Puerto Rico.
25
Pursuant to the IBE Act and the IBE Regulations, each of First
BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation
must maintain books and records of all its transactions in the
ordinary course of business. First BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE
and FirstBank Overseas Corporation are also required thereunder
to submit to the Commissioner quarterly and annual reports of
their financial condition and results of operations, including
annual audited financial statements.
The IBE Act empowers the Commissioner to revoke or suspend,
after notice and hearing, a license issued thereunder if, among
other things, the IBE fails to comply with the IBE Act, the IBE
Regulations or the terms of its license, or if the Commissioner
finds that the business or affairs of the IBE are conducted in a
manner that is not consistent with the public interest.
Puerto
Rico Income Taxes
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994 (the
Code), all companies are treated as separate taxable
entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns.
The Corporation, and each of its subsidiaries are subject to a
maximum statutory corporate income tax rate of 39% or an
alternative minimum tax (AMT) on income earned from
all sources, whichever is higher. The excess of AMT over regular
income tax paid in any one year may be used to offset regular
income tax in future years, subject to certain limitations. The
Code provides for a dividend received deduction of 100% on
dividends received from wholly owned subsidiaries subject to
income taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received
from other taxable domestic corporations.
On March 9, 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act
No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate Puerto
Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico
Governments fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of
temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a
5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is
applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income
exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the
maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary
measure is effective for tax years that commenced after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
In computing the interest expense deduction, the
Corporations interest deduction will be reduced in the
same proportion that the average exempt assets bear to the
average total assets. Therefore, to the extent that the
Corporation holds certain investments and loans that are exempt
from Puerto Rico income taxation, part of its interest expense
will be disallowed for tax purposes.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than
the maximum statutory tax rate of 40.95% during 2009 mainly by
investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed
securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income tax
combined with income from the IBE units of the Corporation and
the Bank and the Banks subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas
Corporation. The IBE, and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were
created under the IBE Act, which provides for Puerto Rico tax
exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico
(except for year tax years commenced after December 31,
2008 and before January 1, 2012, in which all IBEs
are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not
otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code, as provided by
Act. No. 7). Pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 13
of January 8, 2004, the IBE Act was amended to impose
income tax at regular rates on an IBE that operates as a unit of
a bank, to the extent that the IBE net income exceeds 20% of the
banks total net taxable income (including net income
generated by the IBE unit) for taxable years that commenced on
July 1, 2005, and thereafter. These amendments apply only
to IBEs that operate as units of a bank; they do not impose
income tax on an IBE that operates as a subsidiary of a bank.
United
States Income Taxes
The Corporation is also subject to federal income tax on its
income from sources within the United States and on any item of
income that is, or is considered to be, effectively connected
with the active conduct of a trade or business within the United
States. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provides for tax
exemption of portfolio interest received by a foreign
corporation from sources within the United States; therefore,
the Corporation is not subject to federal income tax on certain
U.S. investments which qualify under the term
portfolio interest.
26
Insurance
Operations Regulation
FirstBank Insurance Agency is registered as an insurance agency
with the Insurance Commissioner of Puerto Rico and is subject to
regulations issued by the Insurance Commissioner relating to,
among other things, licensing of employees, sales, solicitation
and advertising practices, and by the FED as to certain consumer
protection provisions mandated by the GLB Act and its
implementing regulations.
Community
Reinvestment
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA),
federally insured banks have a continuing and affirmative
obligation to meet the credit needs of their entire community,
including low- and moderate-income residents, consistent with
their safe and sound operation. The CRA does not establish
specific lending requirements or programs for financial
institutions nor does it limit an institutions discretion
to develop the type of products and services that it believes
are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the
CRA. The CRA requires the federal supervisory agencies, as part
of the general examination of supervised banks, to assess the
banks record of meeting the credit needs of its community,
assign a performance rating, and take such record and rating
into account in their evaluation of certain applications by such
bank. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public
disclosure of their CRA ratings. FirstBank received a
satisfactory CRA rating in their most recent
examinations by the FDIC.
Mortgage
Banking Operations
FirstBank is subject to the rules and regulations of the FHA,
VA, FNMA, FHLMC, HUD and GNMA with respect to originating,
processing, selling and servicing mortgage loans and the
issuance and sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and
regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and
establish underwriting guidelines that include provisions for
inspections and appraisals, require credit reports on
prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and with
respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates. Moreover,
lenders such as FirstBank are required annually to submit to
FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD audited financial statements,
and each regulatory entity has its own financial requirements.
FirstBanks affairs are also subject to supervision and
examination by FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD at all times
to assure compliance with the applicable regulations, policies
and procedures. Mortgage origination activities are subject to,
among others, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Federal
Truth-in-Lending
Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the
regulations promulgated thereunder which, among other things,
prohibit discrimination and require the disclosure of certain
basic information to mortgagors concerning credit terms and
settlement costs. FirstBank is licensed by the Commissioner
under the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, and as such is
subject to regulation by the Commissioner, with respect to,
among other things, licensing requirements and establishment of
maximum origination fees on certain types of mortgage loan
products.
Section 5 of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law requires
the prior approval of the Commissioner for the acquisition of
control of any mortgage banking institution licensed under such
law. For purposes of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, the
term control means the power to direct or influence
decisively, directly or indirectly, the management or policies
of a mortgage banking institution. The Puerto Rico Mortgage
Banking Law provides that a transaction that results in the
holding of less than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
a mortgage banking institution shall not be considered a change
in control.
Certain risk factors that may affect the Corporations
future results of operations are discussed below.
RISK
RELATING TO THE CORPORATIONS BUSINESS
Credit
quality, which is continuing to deteriorate, may result in
future additional losses.
The quality of First BanCorps credits has continued to be
under pressure as a result of continued recessionary conditions
in Puerto Rico and the state of Florida that have led to, among
other things, higher
27
unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new
residential construction projects and further declines in
property values. The Corporations business depends on the
creditworthiness of its customers and counterparties and the
value of the assets securing its loans or underlying our
investments. When the credit quality of the customer base
materially decreases or the risk profile of a market, industry
or group of customers changes materially, the Corporations
business, financial condition, allowance levels, asset
impairments, liquidity, capital and results of operations are
adversely affected.
While the Corporation has substantially increased our allowance
for loan and lease losses in 2009, there is no certainty that it
will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the
portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy,
market conditions or events negatively affecting specific
customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and
Florida. The Corporation periodically review the allowance for
loan and lease losses for adequacy considering economic
conditions and trends, collateral values and credit quality
indicators, including charge-off experience and levels of past
due loans and non-performing assets. First BanCorps future
results may be materially and adversely affected by worsening
defaults and severity rates related to the underlying collateral.
The
Corporation may have more credit risk and higher credit losses
due to its construction loan portfolio.
The Corporation has a significant construction loan portfolio,
in the amount of $1.49 billion as of December 31,
2009, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate
properties. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher
credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since
they are larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single
borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns.
Rapidly changing collateral values, general economic conditions
and numerous other factors continue to create volatility in the
housing markets and have increased the possibility that
additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to the
Corporations current nonperforming assets. Furthermore,
given the current slowdown in the real estate market, the
properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of
if they are foreclosed.
The
Corporation is subject to default risk on loans, which may
adversely affect its results.
The Corporation is subject to the risk of loss from loan
defaults and foreclosures with respect to the loans it
originates. The Corporation establishes a provision for loan
losses, which leads to reductions in its income from operations,
in order to maintain its allowance for inherent loan losses at a
level which its management deems to be appropriate based upon an
assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio. Although the
Corporations management utilizes its best judgment in
providing for loan losses, there can be no assurance that
management has accurately estimated the level of inherent loan
losses or that the Corporation will not have to increase its
provision for loan losses in the future as a result of future
increases in non-performing loans or for other reasons beyond
its control.
Any such increases in the Corporations provision for loan
losses or any loan losses in excess of its provision for loan
losses would have an adverse effect on the Corporations
future financial condition and results of operations. Given the
difficulties facing some of the Corporations largest
borrowers, the Corporation can give no assurance that these
borrowers will continue to repay their loans on a timely basis
or that the Corporation will continue to be able to accurately
assess any risk of loss from the loans to these financial
institutions.
Changes
in collateral valuation for properties located in stagnant or
distressed economies may require increased
reserves.
Substantially all of the loan portfolio of the Corporation is
located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether
the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the
performance of the Corporations loan portfolio and the
collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the
performance of and conditions within each specific real estate
market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate
market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real
estate market are subject to readjustments in value driven not
by demand but more by the purchasing
28
power of the consumers and general economic conditions. In South
Florida, we have been seeing the negative impact associated with
low absorption rates and property value adjustments due to
overbuilding. A significant decline in collateral valuations for
collateral dependent loans may require increases in the
Corporations specific provision for loan losses and an
increase in the general valuation allowance. Any such increase
would have an adverse effect on the Corporations future
financial condition and results of operations.
Worsening
in the financial condition of critical counterparties may result
in higher losses than expected.
The financial stability of several counterparties is critical
for their continued financial performance on covenants that
require the repurchase of loans, posting of collateral to reduce
our credit exposure or replacement of delinquent loans. Many of
these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the
event of a default by one of the Corporations
counterparties. Any such losses could adversely affect the
Corporations business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Interest
rate shifts may reduce net interest income.
Shifts in short-term interest rates may reduce net interest
income, which is the principal component of the
Corporations earnings. Net interest income is the
difference between the amount received by the Corporation on its
interest-earning assets and the interest paid by the Corporation
on its interest-bearing liabilities. When interest rates rise,
the Corporation must pay more in interest on its liabilities
while the interest earned on its assets does not rise as
quickly. This may cause the Corporations profits to
decrease. This adverse impact on earnings is greater when the
slope of the yield curve flattens, that is, when short-term
interest rates increase more than long-term rates.
Increases
in interest rates may reduce the value of holdings of
securities.
Fixed-rate securities acquired by the Corporation are generally
subject to decreases in market value when interest rates rise,
which may require recognition of a loss (e.g., the
identification of
other-than-temporary
impairment on its available for sale or held to maturity
investments portfolio), thereby adversely affecting the results
of operations. Market-related reductions in value also affect
the capabilities of financing these securities.
Increases
in interest rates may reduce demand for mortgage and other
loans.
Higher interest rates increase the cost of mortgage and other
loans to consumers and businesses and may reduce demand for such
loans, which may negatively impact the Corporations
profits by reducing the amount of loan origination income.
Accelerated
prepayments may adversely affect net interest
income.
Net interest income of future periods may be affected by the
acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities.
Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities
would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, as the
amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these
securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the
prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields
on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of
the discount would accelerate.
Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by
the Corporations investment in callable securities.
Approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debentures
with an average yield of 5.82% were called during 2009. The
Corporation re-invested the proceeds of the securities calls in
callable Agency debentures of approximately 2.7 years
average final maturity with a weighted average yield to maturity
of 2.12%.
Decreases in interest rates may increase the probability
embedded call options in investment securities are exercised.
Future net interest income could be affected by the
Corporations holding of callable securities. The recent
drop in long-term interest rates has the effect of increasing
the probability of the exercise of embedded calls in
U.S. Agency securities portfolio of approximately
$1.1 billion that if substituted with new lower-yield
investments may negatively impact the Corporations
interest income.
29
Decreases
in interest rates may reduce net interest income due to the
current unprecedented re-pricing mismatch of assets and
liabilities tied to short-term interest rates, which is referred
to as basis risk.
Basis risk occurs when market rates for different financial
instruments or the indices used to price assets and liabilities,
change at different times or by different amounts. The liquidity
crisis that erupted in late 2008, and that slowly began to
subside during 2009 caused a wider than normal spread between
brokered CD costs and LIBOR rates for similar terms. This in
turn, has prevented the Corporation from capturing the full
benefit of drops in interest rates as the Corporations
loan portfolio, funded by LIBOR-based brokered CDs, continue to
maintain the same spread to short-term LIBOR rates, while the
spread on brokered CDs widened. To the extent that such
pressures fail to subside in the near future, the margin between
the Corporations LIBOR-based assets and LIBOR-based
liabilities may compress and adversely affect net interest
income.
If all
or a significant portion of the unrealized losses in our
investment securities portfolio on our consolidated balance
sheet were determined to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired, we would recognize a material charge to our earnings
and our capital ratios would be adversely
affected.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized
$1.7 million in other than temporary impairments. To the
extent that any portion of the unrealized losses in its
investment securities portfolio is determined to be other than
temporary, and the loss is related to credit factors, the
Corporation recognizes a charge to earnings in the quarter
during which such determination is made and capital ratios could
be adversely affected. If any such charge is significant, a
rating agency might downgrade the Corporations credit
rating or put it on credit watch. Even if the Corporation does
not determine that the unrealized losses associated with this
portfolio requires an impairment charge, increases in these
unrealized losses adversely affect the tangible common equity
ratio, which may adversely affect credit rating agency and
investor sentiment towards the Corporation. This negative
perception also may adversely affect the Corporations
ability to access the capital markets or might increase the cost
of capital.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment on its private label MBS. Valuation and
other-than-temporary
impairment determinations will continue to be affected by
external market factors including default rates, severity rates
and macro-economic factors.
Downgrades
in the Corporations credit ratings could further increase
the cost of borrowing funds.
Both, the Corporation and the Bank suffered credit rating
downgrades in 2009. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (Fitch)
currently rates the Corporations long-term senior debt
B-, six notches below investment grade. Standard and
Poors rates the Corporation B, or five notches below investment
grade. Moodys Investor Service (Moodys) rates
FirstBanks long-term senior debt B1, and
Standard & Poors rates it B. The
three rating agencies outlooks on FirstBank and the
Corporations credit ratings are negative. The Corporation
does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that
would be affected by a credit downgrade. The Corporations
liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external
sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future
downgrades in credit ratings could put additional pressure on
the Corporations access to external funding
and/or cause
external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn
adversely affect the results of operations. Changes in credit
ratings may also affect the fair value of certain liabilities
and unsecured derivatives, measured at fair value in the
financial statements, for which the Corporations own
credit risk is an element considered in the fair value
determination.
These debt and financial strength ratings are current opinions
of the rating agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended
or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of
changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other
circumstances.
The
Corporations funding is significantly dependent on
brokered deposits.
The Corporations funding sources include core deposits,
brokered deposits, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank,
borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank and repurchase
agreements with several counterparties.
30
A large portion of the Corporations funding is retail
brokered CDs issued by FirstBank. As of December 31, 2009,
the Corporation had $7.6 billion in brokered deposits
outstanding, representing approximately 60% of our total
deposits, and a reduction from $8.4 billion at year end
2008. The Corporation issues brokered CDs to, among other
things, pay operating expenses, maintain our lending activities,
replace certain maturing liabilities, and to control interest
rate risk.
FDIC regulations govern the issuance of brokered deposit
instruments by banks. Well-capitalized institutions are not
subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while
adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or
rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and
subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such
deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to
accept brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation was a well-capitalized institution and was therefore
not subject to these limitations on brokered deposits. If the
Corporation became subject to such restrictions on its brokered
deposits, the availability of such deposits would be limited and
could, in turn, adversely affect the results of operations and
the liquidity of the Corporation. The FDIC and other bank
regulators may also exercise regulatory discretion to enforce
limits on the acceptance of brokered deposits if they have
safety and soundness concerns as to an over reliance on such
funding.
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the
growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense
competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits
in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and
liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial
amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy
enhances the Corporations liquidity position, since the
brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and
can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits.
Demand for brokered CDs has recently increased as a result of
the move by investors from riskier investments, such as
equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered
CDs and the recent increase in FDIC deposit insurance from
$100,000 to $250,000. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
the Corporation issued $8.3 billion in brokered CDs
(including rollover of short-term broker CDs and replacement of
brokered CDs called) compared to $9.8 billion for the
2008 year.
The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs
outstanding as of December 31, 2009 was approximately
1.08 years. Approximately 1.55% of the principal value of
these certificates is callable at the Corporations option.
Another source of funding is Advances from the Discount Window
of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Currently, the
Corporation has $800 million of borrowings outstanding with
the Federal Reserve Bank. As part of the mechanisms to ease the
liquidity crisis, during 2009 the Federal Reserve Bank
encouraged banks to utilize the Discount Window as a source of
funding. With the market conditions improving, the Federal
Reserve announced in early 2010 its intention of withdrawing
part of the economic stimulus measures, including replacing
restrictions on the use of Discount Window borrowings, thereby
returning to its function of lender of last resort.
The
Corporations funding sources may prove insufficient to
replace deposits and support future growth.
The Corporations banking subsidiary relies on customer
deposits, brokered deposits and advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB) to fund its operations. Although
the Bank has historically been able to replace maturing deposits
and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that it would
be able to replace these funds in the future if the
Corporations financial condition or general market
conditions were to change. The Corporations financial
flexibility will be severely constrained if the Bank is unable
to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not
available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest
rates. Finally, if the Corporation is required to rely more
heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future
growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover
costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.
Although the Corporation considers such sources of funds
adequate for its liquidity needs, the Corporation may seek
additional debt financing in the future to achieve its long-term
business objectives. There can be no assurance additional
borrowings, if sought, would be available to the Corporation or,
on what terms. If additional financing sources are unavailable
or are not available on reasonable terms, growth and future
prospects could be adversely affected.
31
Adverse
credit market conditions may affect the Corporations
ability to meet liquidity needs.
The Corporation needs liquidity to, among other things, pay its
operating expenses, interest on its debt and dividends on its
capital stock, maintain its lending activities and replace
certain maturing liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, the
Corporation may be forced to curtail its operations. The
availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of
factors such as market conditions, the general availability of
credit and the Corporations credit ratings and credit
capacity. The Corporations financial condition and cash
flows could be materially affected by continued disruptions in
financial markets.
Our
controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, our risk
management policies and procedures may be inadequate, and
operational risk could adversely affect our consolidated results
of operations.
The Corporation may fail to identify and manage risks related to
a variety of aspects of its business, including, but not limited
to, operational risk, interest-rate risk, trading risk,
fiduciary risk, legal and compliance risk, liquidity risk and
credit risk. The Corporation has adopted various controls,
procedures, policies and systems to monitor and manage risk.
While the Corporation currently believes that its risk
management process is effective, the Corporation cannot provide
assurance that those controls, procedures, policies and systems
will always be adequate to identify and manage the risks in the
various businesses. In addition, the Corporations
businesses and the markets in which it operates are continuously
evolving. The Corporation may fail to fully understand the
implications of changes in its businesses or the financial
markets and fail to adequately or timely enhance its risk
framework to address those changes. If the Corporations
risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep
pace with changes in the financial markets or its businesses or
for other reasons, the Corporation could incur losses, suffer
reputational damage or find itself out of compliance with
applicable regulatory mandates or expectations.
The Corporation may also be subject to disruptions from external
events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, which
could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions,
including information processing and financial market settlement
functions. In addition, our customers, vendors and
counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these
events affect us, or the customers, vendors or counterparties
with which we conduct business, our consolidated results of
operations could be negatively affected. When we record balance
sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies related to
operational losses, we may be unable to accurately estimate our
potential exposure, and any reserves we establish to cover
operational losses may not be sufficient to cover our actual
financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition for
the periods in which we recognize the losses.
Competition
for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract
and retain the highly skilled people we need to support our
business.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract
and/or
retain key people. Competition for the best people in most
activities in which we engage can be intense, and we may not be
able to hire people or retain them, particularly in light of
uncertainty concerning evolving compensation restrictions
applicable to banks but not applicable to other financial
services firms. The unexpected loss of services of one or more
of our key personnel could adversely affect our business because
the loss of their skills, knowledge of our markets, and years of
industry experience and, in some cases, because of the
difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Similarly, the loss of key employees, either individually or as
a group, can adversely affect our customers perception of
our ability to continue to manage certain types of investment
management mandates.
Banking
regulators could take adverse action against the
Corporation.
The Corporation is subject to supervision and regulation by the
FED. The Corporation is a bank holding company that qualifies as
a financial holding corporation. As such, the Corporation is
permitted to engage in a broader spectrum of activities than
those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial
holding companies. To continue to qualify as a financial holding
corporation, each of the Corporations banking subsidiaries
must continue to qualify as well-capitalized and
well-managed. As of December 31, 2009, the
32
Corporation and the Bank continue to satisfy all applicable
capital guidelines. This, however, does not prevent banking
regulators from taking adverse actions against the Corporation
if they should conclude that such actions are warranted. If the
Corporation were not to continue to qualify as a financial
holding corporation, it might be required to discontinue certain
activities and may be prohibited from engaging in new activities
without prior regulatory approval. The Bank is subject to
supervision and regulation by the FDIC, which conducts annual
inspections, and, in Puerto Rico the OCIF. The primary
regulators of the Corporation and the Bank have significant
discretion and power to initiate enforcement actions for
violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound
practices in the performance of their supervisory and
enforcement duties and may do so even if the Corporation and the
Bank continue to satisfy all capital requirements. Adverse
action against the Corporation
and/or the
Bank by their primary regulators may affect their businesses.
Further
increases in the FDIC deposit insurance premium may have a
significant financial impact on the Corporation.
The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions
up to certain limits. The FDIC charges insured financial
institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund
(the DIF). Current economic conditions have resulted
in higher bank failures and expectations of future bank
failures. In the event of a bank failure, the FDIC takes control
of a failed bank and ensures payment of deposits up to insured
limits (which have recently been increased) using the resources
of the DIF. The FDIC is required by law to maintain adequate
funding of the DIF, and the FDIC may increase premium
assessments to maintain such funding.
On February 27, 2009, the FDIC determined that it would
assess higher rates for institutions that relied significantly
on secured liabilities or on brokered deposits but, for
well-managed and well-capitalized banks, only when accompanied
by rapid asset growth. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a
final rule imposing a 5 basis-point special assessment on
each insured depository institutions assets minus
Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. On
November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a
13-quarter
prepayment of FDIC premiums due on December 30, 2009.
Although FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such
prepayment, the FDIC may further increase our premiums or impose
additional assessments or prepayment requirements on the
Corporation in the future.
The
Corporation may not be able to recover all assets pledged to
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate
swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed
to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation,
which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate
swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate
swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties
under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the
unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009
under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured
counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This
exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with
Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in
the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of
pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009
amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as
collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate
given that the posted collateral constituted a performance
guarantee under the swap agreements and was not part of a
financing agreement, and that ownership of the securities was
never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest
rate swap agreements Lehmans obligation was to return the
collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc.,
acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a
custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided
instructions to have most of the securities transferred to
Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal
to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month
of December, 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays
Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the
securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons
to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are
no assurances that it
33
will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclays
Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the
securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim
filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities
Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation
can provide no assurances that it will be successful in
recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through
these proceedings.
Our
businesses may be adversely affected by
litigation.
From time to time, our customers, or the government on their
behalf, may make claims and take legal action relating to our
performance of fiduciary or contractual responsibilities. We may
also face employment lawsuits or other legal claims. In any such
claims or actions, demands for substantial monetary damages may
be asserted against us resulting in financial liability or
having an adverse effect on our reputation among investors or on
customer demand for our products and services. We may be unable
to accurately estimate our exposure to litigation risk when we
record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies.
As a result, any reserves we establish to cover any settlements
or judgments may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial
exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to
various regulatory, governmental and law enforcement inquiries,
investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to
participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may
be specifically directed at us. In regulatory enforcement
matters, claims for disgorgement, the imposition of penalties
and the imposition of other remedial sanctions are possible.
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of
legal actions and regulatory matters, we cannot provide
assurance as to the outcome of any pending matter or, if
determined adversely against us, the costs associated with any
such matter, particularly where the claimant seeks very large or
indeterminate damages or where the matter presents novel legal
theories, involves a large number of parties or is at a
preliminary stage. The resolution of certain pending legal
actions or regulatory matters, if unfavorable, could have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations for the quarter in which such actions or matters are
resolved or a reserve is established.
Further information with respect to the foregoing and our other
ongoing litigation matters is provided in Legal Proceedings
included under Item 3 herein.
Our
businesses may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or
other reputational harm.
Our relationships with many of our customers are predicated upon
our reputation as a fiduciary and a service provider that
adheres to the highest standards of ethics, service quality and
regulatory compliance. Adverse publicity, regulatory actions,
litigation, operational failures, the failure to meet customer
expectations and other issues with respect to one or more of our
businesses could materially and adversely affect our reputation,
ability to attract and retain customers or sources of funding
for the same or other businesses. Preserving and enhancing our
reputation also depends on maintaining systems and procedures
that address known risks and regulatory requirements, as well as
our ability to identify and mitigate additional risks that arise
due to changes in our businesses, the market places in which we
operate, the regulatory environment and customer expectations.
If any of these developments has a material adverse effect on
our reputation, our business will suffer.
Changes
in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board or other
standard-setting
bodies may adversely affect the Corporations financial
statements.
The Corporations financial statements are subject to the
application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the
United States (GAAP), which is periodically revised
and/or
expanded. Accordingly, from time to time, the Corporation is
required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by
FASB.
34
Market conditions have prompted accounting standard setters to
promulgate new requirements that further interprets or seeks to
revise accounting pronouncements related to financial
instruments, structures or transactions as well as to issue new
standards expanding disclosures. The impact of accounting
pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented is
disclosed in the Corporations annual and quarterly reports
on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q.
An assessment of proposed standards is not provided as such
proposals are subject to change through the exposure process
and, therefore, the effects on the Corporations financial
statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that
future accounting standards that the Corporation is required to
adopt could change the current accounting treatment that the
Corporation applies to its consolidated financial statements and
that such changes could have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The
Corporation may need additional capital resources in the future
and these capital resources may not be available when needed or
at all.
Due to financial results during 2009 the Corporation may need to
access the capital markets in order to raise additional capital
in the future to absorb potential future credit losses due to
the distressed economic environment, maintain adequate liquidity
and capital resources or to finance future growth, investments
or strategic acquisitions. The Corporation cannot provide
assurances that such capital will be available on acceptable
terms or at all. If the Corporation is unable to obtain
additional capital, it may not be able to maintain adequate
liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth,
make strategic acquisitions or investments.
Unexpected
losses in future reporting periods may require the Corporation
to adjust the valuation allowance against our deferred tax
assets.
The Corporation evaluates the deferred tax assets for
recoverability based on all available evidence. This process
involves significant management judgment about assumptions that
are subject to change from period to period based on changes in
tax laws or variances between the future projected operating
performance and the actual results. The Corporation is required
to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if
the Corporation determines, based on available evidence at the
time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. In determining the more-likely-than-not criterion, the
Corporation evaluates all positive and negative evidence as of
the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments, either
increases or decreases, to the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance will be determined based upon changes in the expected
realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of
the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of
sufficient taxable income in either the carryback or
carryforward periods under the tax law. Due to significant
estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and
the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is
reasonably possible that the Corporation will be required to
record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future
reporting periods. Such a charge could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and
capital position.
If the
Corporations goodwill or amortizable intangible assets
become impaired, it may adversely affect the operating
results.
If the Corporations goodwill or amortizable intangible
assets become impaired the Corporation may be required to record
a significant charge to earnings. Under generally accepted
accounting principles, the Corporation reviews its amortizable
intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicated the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least
annually. Factors that may be considered a change in
circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of the
goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be
recoverable, include reduced future cash flow estimates, and
slower growth rates in the industry.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the
Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to
the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these
35
estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of
goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the
Corporations results of operations and the reporting unit
where goodwill is recorded.
The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill
during the fourth quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a two-step
process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the
Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United
States business segment, indicated potential impairment of
goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below the
carrying amount of its equity book value as of the
December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the completion
of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and
liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of
net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from
the units Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of
the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill.
The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied
fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of
$27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. If the
Corporation is required to record a charge to earnings in the
consolidated financial statements because an impairment of the
goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, the
Corporations results of operations could be adversely
affected.
RISK
RELATED TO BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY
Difficult
market conditions have affected the financial industry and may
adversely affect the Corporation in the future.
Given that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the
United States and given the degree of interrelation between
Puerto Ricos economy and that of the United States, the
Corporation is particularly exposed to downturns in the
U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing
market over the past few years, with falling home prices and
increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have
negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and
resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial
institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as
major commercial banks and investment banks. These write-downs,
initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit
default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn,
have caused many financial institutions to seek additional
capital from private and government entities, to merge with
larger and stronger financial institutions and, in some cases,
fail.
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets
in general and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and
institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding
to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This
market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased
level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of
consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread
reduction of business activity in general. The resulting
economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidence in the
financial markets has already adversely affected our industry
and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations. The Corporation does not expect that the
difficult conditions in the financial markets are likely to
improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions
would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult
market conditions on the Corporation and other financial
institutions. In particular, the Corporation may face the
following risks in connection with these events:
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation expects to face increased regulation of the
financial industry resulting from the recent instability in
capital markets, financial institutions and financial system in
general. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs
and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
|
|
|
|
The Corporations ability to assess the creditworthiness of
our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we
use to select, manage, and underwrite the loans become less
predictive of future behaviors.
|
|
|
|
The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit
exposure require difficult, subjective, and complex judgments,
including forecasts of economic conditions and how these
economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers
to repay their loans, which may no longer be capable of accurate
estimation and which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the
models.
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations ability to borrow from other financial
institutions or to engage in sales of mortgage loans to third
parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions
with government-sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at
all could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the
capital markets or other events, including deteriorating
investor expectations.
|
|
|
|
Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of
consolidation of financial services companies in connection with
current market conditions.
|
A
prolonged economic slowdown or decline in the real estate market
in the U.S. mainland could continue to harm the results of
operations.
The residential mortgage loan origination business has
historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth
and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and
industry-wide losses. The market for residential mortgage loan
originations is currently in decline and this trend could also
reduce the level of mortgage loans the Corporation may produce
in the future and adversely affect our business. During periods
of rising interest rates, refinancing originations for many
mortgage products tend to decrease as the economic incentives
for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are
reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan origination
business is impacted by home values. Over the past eighteen
months, residential real estate values in many areas of the
U.S. mainland have decreased significantly, which has led
to lower volumes and higher losses across the industry,
adversely impacting our mortgage business.
The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and losses on
loans have been higher during the current economic slowdown.
Rising unemployment, higher interest rates or declines in
housing prices have had a greater negative effect on the ability
of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans. Any sustained period
of increased delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could
continue to harm the Corporations ability to sell loans,
the prices the Corporation receives for loans, the values of
mortgage loans
held-for-sale
or residual interests in securitizations, which could harm the
Corporations financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, any material decline in real estate
values would weaken the collateral
loan-to-value
ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower
defaults. In such event, the Corporation will be subject to the
risk of loss on such real asset arising from borrower defaults
to the extent not covered by third-party credit enhancement.
The
Corporations business concentration in Puerto Rico imposes
risks.
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically
concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. This
imposes risks from lack of diversification in the geographical
portfolio. The Corporations financial condition and
results of operations are highly dependent on the economic
conditions of Puerto Rico, where adverse political or economic
developments, natural disasters, and other events could affect
among others, the volume of loan originations, increase the
level of non-performing assets, increase the rate of foreclosure
losses on loans, and reduce the value of the Corporations
loans and loan servicing portfolio.
The
Corporations credit quality may be adversely affected by
Puerto Ricos current economic condition.
Beginning in March 2006 and continuing to todays date, a
number of key economic indicators have showed that the economy
of Puerto Rico has been in recession during that period of time.
Construction remained weak during 2009, as the
Commonwealths fiscal situation and decreasing public
investment in construction projects affected the sector. During
the period from January to December 2009, cement sales, an
indicator of construction activity, declined by 29.6% as
compared to 2008. As of October 2009, exports decreased by 6.8%,
while imports decreased by 8.9%, a negative trade, which
continues since the first negative trade balance of the last
decade was registered in November 2006. Tourism activity also
declined during 2009. Total hotel registrations for January to
October 2009 declined 0.8% as compared to the same period for
2008. During January to September 2009 new vehicle sales
decreased by 23.7%. In 2009, unemployment in Puerto Rico reached
15.0%, up 3.5 points compared with 2008.
On January 14, 2010 the Puerto Rico Planning Board
announced the release of Puerto Ricos macroeconomic data
for fiscal year 2009, ended June 30, 2009, as well as
projected figures for fiscal year ending on
37
June 30, 2010. The fiscal year 2009 showed a reduction of
real GNP of -3.7%, while the projections for the fiscal year of
2010 point toward a positive growth of 0.7%. In general, the
Puerto Rico economy continued its trend of decreasing growth,
primarily due to weaker manufacturing, softer consumption and
decreased government investment in construction.
The above economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and
public sectors may also have an adverse effect on the credit
quality of the Corporations loan portfolios, as
delinquency rates are expected to increase in the short-term,
until the economy stabilizes. Also, a potential reduction in
consumer spending may also impact growth in other interest and
non-interest revenue sources of the Corporation.
Rating
downgrades on the Government of Puerto Ricos debt
obligations may affect the Corporations credit
exposure.
Even though Puerto Ricos economy is closely integrated to
that of the U.S. mainland and its government and many of
its instrumentalities are investment-grade rated borrowers in
the U.S. capital markets, the current fiscal situation of
the Government of Puerto Rico has led nationally recognized
rating agencies to downgrade its debt obligations in the past.
Between May 2006 and mid-2009, the Governments bonds were
downgraded as a result of factors such as the Governments
inability to implement meaningful steps to curb operating
expenditures, improve managerial and budgetary controls, high
debt levels, chronic deficits, and the governments
continued reliance on operating budget loans from the Government
Development Bank for Puerto Rico.
In October and December 2009 both S&P and Moodys
confirmed the Governments bond rating at BBB- and Baa3
with stable outlook, respectively. At present, both rating
agencies maintain the stable outlooks for the general obligation
bonds. In May 2009, S&P and Moodys upgraded the sales
and use tax senior bonds from A+ to AA- and from A1 to Aa3,
respectively due to a modification in its bond resolution.
It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any
potential future ratings downgrade in Puerto Ricos debt
obligations. However, the fallout from the recent budgetary
crisis and a possible ratings downgrade could adversely affect
the value of Puerto Ricos Government obligations.
The
failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect
the Corporation.
The Corporations ability to engage in routine funding
transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and
commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial
institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing,
counterparty and other relationships. The Corporation has
exposure to different industries and counterparties, and
routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the
financial services industry, including brokers and dealers,
commercial banks, investment banks, investment companies and
other institutional clients. In certain of these transactions
the Corporation is required to post collateral to secure the
obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a bankruptcy
or insolvency proceeding involving one of such counterparties,
the Corporation may experience delays in recovering the assets
posted as collateral or may incur a loss to the extent that the
counterparty was holding collateral in excess of the obligation
to such counterparty. There is no assurance that any such losses
would not materially and adversely affect the Corporations
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, many of these transactions expose the Corporation
to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty or
client. In addition, the credit risk may be exacerbated when the
collateral held by the Corporation cannot be realized or is
liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount
of the loan or derivative exposure due to the Corporation. There
is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and
adversely affect the Corporations financial condition and
results of operations.
38
Legislative
and regulatory actions taken now or in the future as a result of
the current crisis in the financial industry may impact our
business, governance structure, financial condition or results
of operations.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial
markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies and
political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the
financial services industry. The U.S. government has
intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has
been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by
temporarily enhancing the liquidity support available to
financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding
facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and
certain types of debt issuances and increasing insurance on bank
deposits.
These programs have subjected financial institutions,
particularly those participating in the
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (the
TARP), to additional restrictions, oversight and
costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation continue to be
introduced in the U.S. Congress that could further
substantially increase regulation of the financial services
industry, impose restrictions on the operations and general
ability of firms within the industry to conduct business
consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of
compensation, interest rates, financial product offerings and
disclosures, and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with
respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among
other things. Federal and state regulatory agencies also
frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the
manner in which existing regulations are applied.
The Corporation also faces increased regulation and regulatory
scrutiny as a result of our participation in the TARP. In
January 2009, the Corporation issued Series F Preferred
Stock and warrants to purchase the Corporations Common
Stock to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP. Pursuant to the
terms of this issuance, the Corporation is prohibited from
increasing the dividend rate on our Common Stock in an amount
exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or
the amount publicly announced (if lower), of Common Stock prior
to October 14, 2008, which was $0.07 per share, without
approval. Furthermore, as long as Series F Preferred Stock
issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, dividend
payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain
equity securities, including the Corporations Common
Stock, are prohibited unless all accrued and unpaid dividends
are paid on Series F Preferred Stock, subject to certain
limited exceptions.
On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives
approved legislation amending the TARP provisions of Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) to include
quarterly reporting requirements with respect to lending
activities, examinations by an institutions primary
federal regulator of the use of funds and compliance with
program requirements, restrictions on acquisitions by depository
institutions receiving TARP funds and authorization for the
U.S. Treasury to have an observer at board meetings of
recipient institutions, among other things. On February 17,
2009, President Obama signed into law the American Reinvestment
and Recovery Act of 2009 (the ARRA). The ARRA
contains expansive new restrictions on executive compensation
for financial institutions and other companies participating in
the TARP. The ARRA amends the executive compensation and
corporate governance provisions of EESA. In doing so, it
continues all the same compensation and governance restrictions
and adds substantially to restrictions in several areas. In
addition, on June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued
regulations implementing the compensation requirements under the
ARRA. The regulations became applicable to existing TARP
recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on
June 15, 2009. The aforementioned compensation requirements
and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to retain or
hire senior bank officers.
The U.S. House of Representatives approved a regulatory
reform package on December 11, 2009 (H.R. 4173). The
U.S. Senate is also expected to consider financial reform
legislation during 2010. H.R. 4173 and a Discussion
Draft of legislation that may be introduced in the
U.S. Senate contain provisions, which would, among other
things, establish a Consumer Financial Protection Agency,
establish a systemic risk regulator, consolidate federal bank
regulators and give shareholders an advisory vote on executive
compensation. Separate legislative proposals call for partial
repeal of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the GLB
Act), which is discussed below.
The Obama administration is also requesting Congressional action
to limit the growth of the largest U.S. financial firms and
to bar banks and bank-related companies from engaging in
proprietary trading and
39
from owning, investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private
equity funds. A separate legislative proposal would impose a new
fee or tax on U.S. financial institutions as part of the
2010 budget plans in an effort to reduce the anticipated budget
deficit and to recoup losses anticipated from the TARP. Such an
assessment is estimated to be 15-basis points, levied against
bank assets minus Tier 1 capital and domestic deposits. It
appears that this fee or tax would be assessed only against the
50 or so largest financial institutions in the U.S., which are
those with more than $50 billion in assets, and therefore
would not directly affect First BanCorp. However, the large
banks that are affected by the tax may choose to seek additional
deposit funding in the marketplace, driving up the cost of
deposits for all banks. The administration has also considered a
transaction tax on trades of stock in financial institutions and
a tax on executive bonuses.
The U.S. Congress has also recently adopted additional
consumer protection laws such as the Credit Card Accountability
Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and the Federal
Reserve has adopted numerous new regulations addressing
banks credit card, overdraft and mortgage lending
practices. Additional consumer protection legislation and
regulatory activity is anticipated in the near future.
Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
(the Basel Committee) and the Financial Stability
Board (established in April 2009 by the Group of Twenty Finance
Ministers and Central Bank Governors to take action to
strengthen regulation and supervision of the financial system
with greater international consistency, cooperation and
transparency) have committed to raise capital standards and
liquidity buffers within the banking system.
Such proposals and legislation, if finally adopted, would change
banking laws and our operating environment and that of our
subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The
Corporation cannot determine whether such proposals and
legislation will be adopted, or the ultimate effect that such
proposals and legislation, if enacted, or regulations issued to
implement the same, would have upon its financial condition or
results of operations.
Monetary
policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In addition to being affected by general economic conditions,
the earnings and growth of First BanCorp are affected by the
policies of the Federal Reserve. An important function of the
Federal Reserve is to regulate the money supply and credit
conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to
implement these objectives are open market operations in
U.S. Government securities, adjustments of the discount
rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits.
These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence
overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank
loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest
rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
On January 6, 2010, the member agencies of the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council (the
FFIEC), which includes the Federal Reserve, issued
an interest rate risk advisory reminding banks to maintain sound
practices for managing interest rate risk, particularly in the
current environment of historically low short-term interest
rates.
The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve
have had a significant effect on the operating results of
commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do
so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our
business, financial condition and results of operations cannot
be predicted.
The
Corporation faces extensive and changing government regulation,
which may increase our costs of and expose us to risks related
to compliance.
Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation by
multiple regulatory bodies. These regulations may affect the
manner and terms of delivery of our services. If we do not
comply with governmental regulations, we may be subject to
fines, penalties, lawsuits or material restrictions on our
businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred,
which may adversely affect our business operations. Changes in
these regulations can significantly affect the services that we
are asked to provide as well as our costs of compliance with
such regulations. In addition, adverse publicity and damage to
our reputation arising
40
from the failure or perceived failure to comply with legal,
regulatory or contractual requirements could affect our ability
to attract and retain customers. In recent years, regulatory
oversight and enforcement have increased substantially, imposing
additional costs and increasing the potential risks associated
with our operations. If this regulatory trend continues, it
could adversely affect our operations and, in turn, our
consolidated results of operations.
We are
subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and if we
fail to meet these guidelines our business and financial
condition may be adversely affected.
Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and other
regulatory requirements, the Corporation and the Bank must meet
guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, subject to
qualitative judgments by regulators regarding components, risk
weightings and other factors. If we fail to meet these minimum
capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our
business and financial condition will be materially and
adversely affected. If we fail to maintain well-capitalized
status under the regulatory framework, or are deemed to be not
well-managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we
experience certain regulatory violations, our status as a
financial holding company and our related eligibility for a
streamlined review process for acquisition proposals, and our
ability to offer certain financial products will be compromised.
The
imposition of additional property tax payments in Puerto Rico
may further deteriorate our commercial, consumer and mortgage
loan portfolios.
On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into
law the Special Act Declaring a State of Fiscal Emergency and
Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save
Puerto Ricos Credit, Act No. 7 the Act).
The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures,
including the imposition of a 0.591% special tax applicable to
properties used for residential (excluding those exempt as
detailed in the Act) and commercial purposes, and payable to the
Puerto Rico Treasury Department. This temporary measure will be
effective for tax years that commenced after June 30, 2009
and before July 1, 2012. The imposition of this special
property tax could adversely affect the disposable income of
borrowers from the commercial, consumer and mortgage loan
portfolios and may cause an increase in our delinquency and
foreclosure rates.
RISKS
RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE CORPORATIONS
SECURITIES
The
market price of the Corporations common stock may be
subject to significant fluctuations and
volatility.
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of
volatility. These market fluctuations have adversely affected,
and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of the
Corporations common stock. In addition, the market price
of the Corporations common stock has been subject to
significant fluctuations and volatility because of factors
specifically related to its businesses and may continue to
fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause
fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market price
of the Corporations common stock, many of which could be
beyond its control, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations,
results or prospects of the Corporations businesses and
market assessments of these changes or perceived changes;
|
|
|
|
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other
material events by the Corporation or its competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new
governmental regulations or proposals, affecting the
Corporation, including those relating to the recent financial
crisis and global economic downturn and those that may be
specifically directed to the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of
improvement in general market and economic conditions in the
Corporations principal markets;
|
|
|
|
the departure of key personnel;
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets;
|
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management,
securities analysts and investors; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of companies that
investors deem comparable to the Corporation.
|
Our
suspension of dividends could adversely affect our stock price
and result in the expansion of our board of
directors.
In March of 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System issued a supervisory guidance letter intended to provide
direction to bank holding companies (BHCs) on the
declaration and payment of dividends, capital redemptions and
capital repurchases by BHCs in the context of their capital
planning process. The letter reiterates the long-standing
Federal Reserve supervisory policies and guidance to the effect
that BHCs should only pay dividends from current earnings. More
specifically, the letter heightens expectations that BHCs will
inform and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff on
the declaration and payment of dividends that exceed earnings
for the period for which a dividend is being paid. In
consideration of the financial results reported for the second
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation decided, as a
matter of prudent fiscal management and following the Federal
Reserve guidance, to suspend payment of common stock dividends
and dividends on all series of preferred stock. The Corporation
cannot anticipate if and when the payment of dividends might be
reinstated.
This suspension could adversely affect the Corporations
stock price. Further, in general, if dividends on our preferred
stock are not paid for six quarterly dividend periods or more,
the authorized number of directors of the board will be
increased by two and the preferred stockholders will have the
right to elect two additional members of the Corporations
board of directors until all accrued and unpaid dividends for
all past dividend periods have been declared and paid in full.
Dividends
on the Corporations common stock have been suspended and a
holder may not receive funds in connection with its investment
in our common stock without selling its shares of common
stock.
Holders of common stock are only entitled to receive such
dividends as the Corporations board of directors may
declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The
Corporation announced the suspension of dividend payments on its
common stock. In general, so long as any shares of preferred
stock remain outstanding and until the Corporation satisfies
various Federal regulatory considerations, the Corporation
cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of the
Corporations common stock unless all accrued and unpaid
dividends on its preferred stock for the twelve monthly dividend
periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment
date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and the full
monthly dividend on its preferred stock for the then current
month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or
declared and set apart for payment. Furthermore, prior to
January 16, 2012, unless the Corporation has redeemed all
of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor
security) or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of
Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor security) to
third parties, the consent of the U.S. Treasury will be
required for the Corporation to, among other things, increase
the dividend rate per share of Common Stock above $0.07 per
share or to repurchase or redeem equity securities, including
the Corporations common stock, subject to certain limited
exceptions. This could adversely affect the market price of the
Corporations common stock. Also, the Corporation is a bank
holding company and its ability to declare and pay dividends is
dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations,
including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding
capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal Reserve
and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that bank
holding companies and insured banks should generally pay
dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current
financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has
indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review
their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out
ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless both asset
quality and capital are very strong.
In addition, the terms of the Corporations outstanding
junior subordinated debt securities held by trusts that issue
trust preferred securities prohibit the Corporation from
declaring or paying any dividends or distributions on its
capital stock, including its common stock and preferred stock,
or purchasing, acquiring, or
42
making a liquidation payment on such stock, if the Corporation
has given notice of its election to defer interest payments but
the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral
period is continuing.
Offerings
of debt, which would be senior to the common stock upon
liquidation and/or to preferred equity securities, which may be
senior to the common stock for purposes of dividend
distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the
market price of the common stock.
The Corporation may attempt to increase its capital resources
or, if its or the capital ratios of FirstBank fall below the
required minimums, the Corporation or FirstBank could be forced
to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of
debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term
notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes
and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of debt
securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with
respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of the
Corporations available assets prior to the holders of the
common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the
holdings of existing stockholders or reduce the market price of
the common stock, or both.
The Corporations board of directors is authorized to issue
one or more classes or series of preferred stock from time to
time without any action on the part of the stockholders. The
Corporations board of directors also has the power,
without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such
classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued,
including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over
the common stock with respect to dividends or upon the
Corporations dissolution, winding up and liquidation and
other terms. If the Corporation issues preferred shares in the
future that have a preference over the common stock with respect
to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if the
Corporation issues preferred shares with voting rights that
dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of
holders of the common stock or the market price of the common
stock could be adversely affected.
There
may be future dilution of the Corporations common
stock.
In January 2009, in connection with the
U.S. Treasurys TARP Capital Purchase Program,
established as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury
400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference
value per share. In connection with this investment, the
Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to
purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common
stock (the Warrant) at an exercise price of $10.27
per share. The Warrant has a
10-year term
and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are
subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, in
connection with its sale of 9,250,450 shares of common
stock to the Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), the
Corporation agreed to give BNS an anti-dilution right and a
right of first refusal when the Corporation sells shares of
common stock to third parties. The possible future issuance of
equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant or to BNS
as a result of its rights could affect the Corporations
current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock
(the shares underlying the Warrant represent approximately 6% of
the Corporations outstanding shares of common stock as of
December 31, 2009 and BNS owns 10% of the
Corporations shares of common stock);
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the
outstanding shares of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
|
Also, recent increases in the allowance for loan and lease
losses resulted in a reduction in the amount of the
Corporations tangible common equity. Given the focus on
tangible common equity by regulatory authorities and rating
agencies, the Corporation may be required to raise additional
capital through the issuance of additional common stock in
future periods to increase that tangible common equity. However,
no assurance can be given that the Corporation will be able to
raise additional capital. An increase in the Corporations
capital through an issuance of common stock could have a
dilutive effect on the existing holders of our Common Stock and
may adversely affect its market price.
43
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
As of December 31, 2009, First BanCorp owned the following
three main offices located in Puerto Rico:
Main offices:
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters Located at First Federal Building, 1519
Ponce de Leïon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, a 16 story
office building. Approximately 60% of the building, an
underground three level parking lot and an adjacent parking lot
are owned by the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
EDP & Operations Center A five-story
structure located at 1506 Ponce de Leïon Avenue, Santurce,
Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully occupied by the
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Consumer Lending Center A three-story building with
a three-level parking lot located at 876 Muônoz Rivera
Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully
occupied by the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
In addition, during 2006, First BanCorp purchased a building
located on 1130 Muônoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto
Rico. These facilities are being renovated and expanded to
accommodate branch operations, data processing, administrative
and certain headquarter offices. FirstBank expects to commence
occupancy in summer 2010.
|
The Corporation owned 24 branch and office premises and auto
lots and leased 117 branch premises, loan and office centers and
other facilities. In certain situations, financial services such
as mortgage, insurance businesses and commercial banking
services are located in the same building. All of these premises
are located in Puerto Rico, Florida and in the U.S. and
British Virgin Islands. Management believes that the
Corporations properties are well maintained and are
suitable for the Corporations business as presently
conducted.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in various
lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. In the
opinion of the Corporations management the pending and
threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will
not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or
results of operations of the Corporation.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Information
about Market and Holders
The Corporations common stock is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol FBP. On
December 31, 2009, there were 540 holders of record of the
Corporations common stock.
44
The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters
indicated, the high and low closing sales prices and the cash
dividends declared on the Corporations common stock during
such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Last
|
|
per Share
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
March
|
|
|
11.05
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
12.17
|
|
|
$
|
7.91
|
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
September
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
June
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
March
|
|
|
10.97
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
September
|
|
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
June
|
|
|
13.64
|
|
|
|
10.99
|
|
|
|
10.99
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
March
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
|
|
9.08
|
|
|
|
13.26
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
First BanCorp has five outstanding series of non convertible
preferred stock: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income
preferred stock, Series A (liquidation preference $25 per
share); 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred
stock, Series B (liquidation preference $25 per share);
7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series C (liquidation preference $25 per share); 7.25%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series D (liquidation preference $25 per share,); and 7.00%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series E (liquidation preference $25 per share)
(collectively Preferred Stock), which trade on the
NYSE.
On January 16, 2009, the Corporation issued to the
U.S. Treasury the Series F Preferred Stock and the
Warrant, which transaction is described in
Item 1 Recent Significant Events on page 9.
The Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock rank on
parity with respect to dividend rights and rights upon
liquidation, winding up or dissolution. Holders of each series
of preferred stock are entitled to receive cash dividends, when,
as and if declared by the board of directors of First BanCorp
out of funds legally available for dividends. The Purchase
Agreement of the Series F Preferred stock contains
limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock,
including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount
not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share,
or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock
prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share.
The terms of the Corporations preferred stock do not
permit the Corporation to declare, set apart or pay any dividend
or make any other distribution of assets on, or redeem,
purchase, set apart or otherwise acquire shares of common stock
or of any other class of stock of First BanCorp ranking junior
to the preferred stock, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends
on the preferred stock and any parity stock, for the twelve
monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding
dividend payment date, shall have been paid or are paid
contemporaneously; the full monthly dividend on the preferred
stock and any parity stock for the then current month has been
or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set
apart for payment; and the Corporation has not defaulted in the
payment of the redemption price of any shares of the preferred
stock and any parity stock called for redemption. If the
Corporation is unable to pay in full the dividends on the
preferred stock and on any other shares of stock of equal rank
as to the payment of dividends, all dividends declared upon the
preferred stock and any such other shares of stock will be
declared pro rata.
The Corporation may not issue shares ranking, as to dividend
rights or rights on liquidation, winding up and dissolution,
senior to the Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock,
except with the consent of the
45
holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding aggregate
liquidation preference of the Series A, B, C, D, E and F
Preferred Stock.
Dividends
The Corporation has a policy of paying quarterly cash dividends
on its outstanding shares of common stock subject to its
earnings and financial condition. On July 30, 2009 after
reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved
to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends
(including the Series F Preferred Stock dividends),
effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August
2009. During 2009, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of
$0.07 per share for the first two quarters of the year. During
years 2008 and 2007, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of
$0.07 per share for each quarter of such years. The
Corporations ability to pay future dividends will
necessarily depend upon its earnings and financial condition.
See the discussion under Dividend Restrictions under
Item 1 for additional information concerning restrictions
on the payment of dividends that apply to the Corporation and
FirstBank.
First BanCorp did not purchase any of its equity securities
during 2009 or 2008.
The Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code requires the withholding
of income tax from dividend income derived by resident
U.S. citizens, special partnerships, trusts and estates and
non-resident U.S. citizens, custodians, partnerships, and
corporations from sources within Puerto Rico.
Resident
U.S. Citizens
A special tax of 10% is imposed on eligible dividends paid to
individuals, special partnerships, trusts, and estates to be
applied to all distributions unless the taxpayer specifically
elects otherwise. Once this election is made it is irrevocable.
However, the taxpayer can elect to include in gross income the
eligible distributions received and take a credit for the amount
of tax withheld. If the taxpayer does not make this election on
the tax return, then he can exclude from gross income the
distributions received and reported without claiming the credit
for the tax withheld.
Nonresident
U.S. Citizens
Nonresident U.S. citizens have the right to certain
exemptions when a Withholding Tax Exemption Certificate
(Form 2732) is properly completed and filed with the
Corporation. The Corporation, as withholding agent, is
authorized to withhold a tax of 10% only from the excess of the
income paid over the applicable tax-exempt amount.
U.S.
Corporations and Partnerships
Corporations and partnerships not organized under Puerto Rico
laws that have not engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico
during the taxable year in which the dividend is paid are
subject to the 10% dividend tax withholding. Corporations or
partnerships not organized under the laws of Puerto Rico that
have engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico are not subject
to the 10% withholding, but they must declare the dividend as
gross income on their Puerto Rico income tax return.
46
Securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans
The following summarizes equity compensation plans approved by
security holders and equity compensation plans that were not
approved by security holders as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Options
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (A))
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
2,481,310
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
|
3,767,784
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,481,310
|
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
|
3,767,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options granted under the 1997 stock option plan which
expired on January 21, 2007. All outstanding awards under
the stock option plan continue in full forth and effect, subject
to their original terms and the shares of common stock
underlying the options are subject to adjustments for stock
splits, reorganization and other similar events. |
|
(2) |
|
Securities available for future issuance under the First BanCorp
2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan)
approved by stockholder on April 29, 2008. The Omnibus Plan
provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the
awards) through the grant of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan
allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common
stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization
and other similar events. |
47
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following Performance Graph shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating
by reference this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act) or the Exchange Act, except to
the extent that First BanCorp specifically incorporates this
information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed
filed under these Acts.
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return
of First BanCorp during the measurement period with the
cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of
the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Supercom Banks Index
(the Peer Group). The Performance Graph assumes that
$100 was invested on December 31, 2004 in each of First
BanCorp common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer
Group. The comparisons in this table are set forth in response
to SEC disclosure requirements, and are therefore not intended
to forecast or be indicative of future performance of First
BanCorps common stock.
The cumulative total stockholder return was obtained by dividing
(i) the cumulative amount of dividends per share, assuming
dividend reinvestment since the measurement point,
December 31, 2004, plus (ii) the change in the per
share price since the measurement date, by the share price at
the measurement date.
48
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated
financial data for each of the five years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. This information should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and the related notes thereto.
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial
ratios results)
|
|
Condensed Income Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
996,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,189,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,813
|
|
|
$
|
1,067,590
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
599,016
|
|
|
|
738,231
|
|
|
|
845,119
|
|
|
|
635,271
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
527,881
|
|
|
|
451,016
|
|
|
|
443,694
|
|
|
|
432,319
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
74,991
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
74,643
|
|
|
|
67,156
|
|
|
|
31,336
|
|
|
|
63,077
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
333,371
|
|
|
|
307,843
|
|
|
|
287,963
|
|
|
|
315,132
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(270,653
|
)
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
89,719
|
|
|
|
112,076
|
|
|
|
129,620
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
(27,442
|
)
|
|
|
(15,016
|
)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
109,937
|
|
|
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
84,634
|
|
|
|
114,604
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
44,358
|
|
|
|
74,328
|
|
Per Common Share Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share basic
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Average shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,508
|
|
|
|
86,549
|
|
|
|
82,835
|
|
|
|
80,847
|
|
Average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,644
|
|
|
|
86,866
|
|
|
|
83,138
|
|
|
|
82,771
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
10.78
|
|
|
$
|
9.42
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
8.01
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
10.22
|
|
|
$
|
8.87
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
$
|
13,088,292
|
|
|
$
|
11,799,746
|
|
|
$
|
11,263,980
|
|
|
$
|
12,685,929
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
528,120
|
|
|
|
281,526
|
|
|
|
190,168
|
|
|
|
158,296
|
|
|
|
147,999
|
|
Money market and investment securities
|
|
|
4,866,617
|
|
|
|
5,709,154
|
|
|
|
4,811,413
|
|
|
|
5,544,183
|
|
|
|
6,653,924
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
44,698
|
|
|
|
52,083
|
|
|
|
51,034
|
|
|
|
54,908
|
|
|
|
58,292
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
109,197
|
|
|
|
128,039
|
|
|
|
90,130
|
|
|
|
162,096
|
|
|
|
130,140
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
|
19,491,268
|
|
|
|
17,186,931
|
|
|
|
17,390,256
|
|
|
|
19,917,651
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
13,057,430
|
|
|
|
11,034,521
|
|
|
|
11,004,287
|
|
|
|
12,463,752
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
5,214,147
|
|
|
|
4,736,670
|
|
|
|
4,460,006
|
|
|
|
4,662,271
|
|
|
|
5,750,197
|
|
Total preferred equity
|
|
|
928,508
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
Total common equity
|
|
|
644,062
|
|
|
|
940,628
|
|
|
|
896,810
|
|
|
|
709,620
|
|
|
|
663,416
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
|
|
(25,264
|
)
|
|
|
(30,167
|
)
|
|
|
(15,675
|
)
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
1,548,117
|
|
|
|
1,421,646
|
|
|
|
1,229,553
|
|
|
|
1,197,841
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets
|
|
|
(1.39
|
)
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
Return on Average Total Equity
|
|
|
(14.84
|
)
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
7.06
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
Return on Average Common Equity
|
|
|
(34.07
|
)
|
|
|
7.89
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets
|
|
|
9.36
|
|
|
|
7.74
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
7.09
|
|
Interest Rate Spread(1)(2)
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
Interest Rate Margin(1)(2)
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio(1)
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
(4.03
|
)
|
|
|
37.19
|
|
|
|
88.32
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
30.46
|
|
Efficiency ratio(3)
|
|
|
53.24
|
|
|
|
55.33
|
|
|
|
59.41
|
|
|
|
60.62
|
|
|
|
63.61
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial
ratios results)
|
|
Asset Quality:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs
|
|
|
1.74
|
x
|
|
|
1.76
|
x
|
|
|
1.36
|
x
|
|
|
1.16
|
x
|
|
|
1.12
|
x
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
8.71
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans receivable
|
|
|
11.23
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
Allowance to total non-performing loans
|
|
|
33.77
|
|
|
|
47.95
|
|
|
|
46.04
|
|
|
|
62.79
|
|
|
|
110.18
|
|
Allowance to total non-performing loans, excluding residential
real estate loans
|
|
|
47.06
|
|
|
|
90.16
|
|
|
|
93.23
|
|
|
|
115.33
|
|
|
|
186.06
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Price: End of period
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
$
|
12.41
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-gaap measures. Refer to Capital discussion below
for additional information of the components and reconciliation
of these measures. |
|
(2) |
|
On a tax equivalent basis (see Net Interest Income
discussion below). |
|
(3) |
|
Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and
non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring
income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
and financial instruments measured at fair value. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the
accompanying consolidated audited financial statements of First
BanCorp (the Corporation or First
BanCorp) and should be read in conjunction with the
audited financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company
headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full
range of financial products to consumers and commercial
customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the
holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank
or the Bank), Grupo Empresas de Servicios
Financieros (d/b/a PR Finance Group) and FirstBank
Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the
Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States
and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA)
specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan
originations, finance leases, personal loans, small loans, auto
loans, insurance agency and broker-dealer activities.
OVERVIEW
OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
First BanCorps results of operations depend primarily upon
its net interest income, which is the difference between the
interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including
investment securities and loans, and the interest expense on its
interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings.
Net interest income is affected by various factors, including:
the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and
the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities.
The Corporations results of operations also depend on the
provision for loan and lease losses, which significantly
affected the results for the year ended December 31, 2009,
non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and other
costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on
loans and deposits and insurance income), the results of its
hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains
(losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes which
also significantly affected 2009 results.
50
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to
$275.2 million or $(3.48) per diluted common share,
compared to net income of $109.9 million or $0.75 per
diluted common share for 2008 and net income of
$68.1 million or $0.32 per diluted common share for 2007.
The Corporations financial results for 2009, as compared
to 2008, were principally impacted by: (i) an increase of
$388.9 million in the provision for loan and lease losses
attributable to the significant increase in the volume of
non-performing and impaired loans, the migration of loans to
higher risk categories, increases in loss factors used to
determine general reserves to account for increases in
charge-offs, delinquency levels and weak economic conditions,
and the overall growth of the loan portfolio, (ii) an
increase of $36.3 million in income tax expense, affected
by a non-cash increase of $184.4 million in the
Corporations deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to
losses incurred in 2009, (iii) an increase of
$18.7 million in non-interest expenses driven by increases
in the FDIC deposit insurance premium partially offset by a
reduction in employees compensation and benefit expenses,
and (iv) a decrease of $8.8 million in net interest
income mainly due to lower loan yields adversely affected by the
higher volume of non-performing loans and the repricing of
adjustable rate commercial and construction loans tied to
short-term indexes. These factors were partially offset by an
increase of $67.6 million in non-interest income primarily
due to realized gains of $86.8 million on the sale of
investment securities in 2009, mainly U.S. Agency
mortgage-backed securities.
The following table summarizes the effect of the aforementioned
factors and other factors that significantly impacted financial
results in previous years on net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders and (loss) earnings per common share for the
last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per common share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders for prior year
|
|
$
|
69,661
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
27,860
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
44,358
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
Increase (decrease) from changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
(8,839
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
76,865
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(388,910
|
)
|
|
|
(4.20
|
)
|
|
|
(70,338
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(45,619
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
Net gain (loss) on investments and impairments
|
|
|
63,953
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
23,919
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Gain (loss) on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of
secured commercial loans to local financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
13,137
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a
contingency settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,075
|
)
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits
|
|
|
9,119
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(1,490
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(12,840
|
)
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
11,344
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Deposit insurance premium
|
|
|
(30,471
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
(3,424
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(5,073
|
)
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Net loss on REO operations
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(18,973
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible impairment
|
|
|
(3,988
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other operating expenses
|
|
|
6,508
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
(6,583
|
)
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
(10,929
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(36,266
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
53,315
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before changes in preferred stock dividends,
preferred discount amortization and change in average common
shares
|
|
|
(315,463
|
)
|
|
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
Change in preferred dividends and preferred discount amortization
|
|
|
(6,612
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in average common shares(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
69,661
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
27,860
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2008, mainly attributed to the sale of 9.250 million
common shares to the Bank of Nova Scotia
(Scotiabank) in the second half of 2007. |
51
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$275.2 million compared to net income of
$109.9 million and net income of $68.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2009 amounted to $(3.48) compared to earnings
per diluted share of $0.75 and $0.32 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $519.0 million compared to $527.9 million and
$451.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Net interest spread and margin on an
adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation
of this non-GAAP measure, refer to the Net Interest
Income discussion below) were 2.62% and 2.93%,
respectively, down 21 and 27 basis points from 2008. The
decrease for 2009 compared to 2008 was mainly associated with a
significant increase in non-performing loans and the repricing
of floating-rate commercial and construction loans at lower
rates due to decreases in market interest rates such as
three-month LIBOR and the Prime rate, even though the
Corporation is actively increasing spreads on loan renewals. The
Corporation increased the use of interest rate floors in new
commercial and construction loans agreements and renewals in
2009 to protect net interest margins going forward. Lower loan
yields more than offset the benefit of lower short-term rates in
the average cost of funding and the increase in average
interest-earning assets. Refer to the Net Interest
Incomediscussion below for additional information.
|
The increase in net interest income for 2008, compared to 2007,
was mainly associated with a decrease in the average cost of
funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and, to a
lesser extent, a higher volume of interest-earning assets. The
decrease in funding costs more than offset lower loans yields
resulting from the repricing of variable-rate construction and
commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and from a higher
volume of non-accrual loans.
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 was
$579.9 million compared to $190.9 million and
$120.6 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly attributable
to the significant increase in non-performing loans and
increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and
construction loans. Also, the migration of loans to higher risk
categories and increases to loss factors used to determine the
general reserve allowance contributed to the higher provision.
|
The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly
attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels
and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and
construction loans. During 2008, the Corporation experienced
continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends
on its construction loan portfolio, in particular,
condo-conversion loans affected by the continuing deterioration
in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and
declining housing prices in the United States and on its
commercial loan portfolio which was adversely impacted by
deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Also, higher
reserves for residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico and in
the United States were necessary to account for the credit risk
tied to recessionary conditions in the economy.
Refer to the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses and
Risk Management discussions below for additional
information and further analysis of the allowance for loan and
lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $142.3 million compared to $74.6 million and
$67.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest income in
2009, compared to 2008, was mainly related to a
$59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of
investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million
gain on the sale of mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
(mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate MBS), compared to realized
gains on the sale of MBS of $17.7 million in 2008. In an
effort to manage interest rate risk, and taking advantage of
favorable market valuations, approximately $1.8 billion of
U.S. agency MBS (mainly
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
30 year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS) were sold in 2009,
compared to approximately $526 million of U.S. agency
MBS sold in 2008. Also contributing to higher non-interest
income was the $5.3 million increase in gains from mortgage
banking activities, due to the increased volume of loan sales
and securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of
sale amounted to $6.1 million for 2009 compared to
$1.6 million for 2008. The increase was mainly related to
$4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection
with the securitization of approximately $305 million
FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in
several years, the Corporation has been engaged in the
securitization of mortgage loans since early 2009.
|
The increase in non-interest income in 2008, compared to 2007,
was related to a realized gain of $17.7 million on the sale
of investment securities (mainly U.S. sponsored agency
fixed-rate MBS) and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale
of part of the Corporations investment in VISA in
connection with VISAs initial public offering
(IPO). A surge in MBS prices, mainly due to
announcements of the Federal Reserve (FED) that it
will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from
U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including
$500 billion in MBS, provided an opportunity to realize a
sale of approximately $284 million fixed-rate
U.S. agency MBS at a gain of $11.0 million. Early in
2008, a spike and subsequent contraction in yield spread for
U.S. agency MBS also provided an opportunity for the sale
of approximately $242 million and a realized gain of
$6.9 million. Higher point of sale (POS) and ATM
interchange fee income and an increase in fee income from cash
management services provided to corporate customers also
contributed to the increase in non-interest income. The increase
in non-interest income attributable to these activities was
partially offset, when comparing 2008 to 2007, by isolated
events such as the $15.1 million income recognition for
reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers,
related to the class action lawsuit settled in 2007, and a gain
of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and
of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and
recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local
financial institution that were all recognized in 2007.
Refer to Non-Interest Income discussion below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses for 2009 was $352.1 million compared
to $333.4 million and $307.8 million for 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest expenses for
2009, as compared to 2008, was principally attributable to:
(i) an increase of $30.5 million in the FDIC deposit
insurance premium, including $8.9 million for the special
assessment levied by the FDIC in 2009 and increases in regular
assessment rates, (ii) a $4.0 million core deposit
intangible impairment charge, and (iii) a $1.8 million
increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding
unfunded loan commitments. The aforementioned increases were
partially offset by decreases in certain controllable expenses
such as: (i) a $9.1 million decrease in
employees compensation and benefit expenses, due to a
lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive
compensation and overtime costs, (ii) a $3.4 million
decrease in business promotion expenses due to a lower level of
marketing activities, and (iii) a $1.1 million
decrease in taxes, other than income taxes, driven by a
reduction in municipal taxes which are assessed based on taxable
gross revenues.
|
The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008, as compared to
2007, was principally attributable to: (i) a higher net
loss on REO operations that increased to $21.4 million for
2008 from $2.4 million for 2007, driven by a higher
inventory of repossessed properties and declining real estate
prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused
write-downs on the value of repossessed properties, and
(ii) an increase of $3.4 million in deposit insurance
premium expense, as the Corporation used available one-time
credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a
new assessment system adopted by the FDIC, and (iii) higher
occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of
$2.9 million tied to the growth of the Corporations
operations. The Corporation was able to continue the growth of
its operations without incurring substantial additional
non-interest expenses as reflected by a slight increase of 2% in
non-interest expenses, excluding the increase in REO operations
losses. Modest increases were observed in occupancy and
equipment expenses, an increase of $2.9 million, and in
employees compensation and benefit, an increase of
$1.5 million. Refer to Non-Interest
Expensesdiscussion below for additional information.
53
|
|
|
|
|
For 2009, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of
$4.5 million, compared to an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million for 2008. The income tax expense for 2009
mainly resulted from the aforementioned $184.4 million
non-cash increase in the valuation allowance for the
Corporations deferred tax asset. The increase in the
valuation allowance was driven by the losses incurred in 2009
that placed FirstBank in a three-year cumulative loss position
as of the end of the third quarter of 2009.
|
For 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of
$21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation was mainly related
to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was
derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through
the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas
Corporation. Also, the positive fluctuation in financial results
was impacted by two transactions: (i) a reversal of
$10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits
(UTBs) during the second quarter of 2008 for
positions taken on income tax returns due to the lapse of the
statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year, and
(ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of
$5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into
with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first
quarter of 2008 that established a multi-year allocation
schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment
made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class
action suit.
Refer to Income Taxes discussion below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets as of December 31, 2009 amounted to
$19.6 billion, an increase of $137.2 million compared
to $19.5 billion as of December 31, 2008. The
Corporations loan portfolio increased by
$860.9 million (before the allowance for loan and lease
losses), driven by new originations, mainly credit facilities
extended to the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. Also, an increase of $298.4 million
in cash and cash equivalents contributed to the increase in
total assets, as the Corporation improved its liquidity position
as a precautionary measure given current volatile market
conditions. Partially offsetting the increase in loans and
liquid assets was a $790.8 million decrease in investment
securities, driven by sales and principal repayments of MBS.
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, total liabilities amounted to
$18.0 billion, an increase of $86.2 million as
compared to $17.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. The
increase in total liabilities was mainly attributable to an
increase of $818 million in short-term advances from the
FED and FHLB and an increase of $480 million in
non-brokered deposits, partially offset by a decrease of
$868.4 million in brokered CDs and a decrease of
$344.4 million in repurchase agreements. The Corporation
has been reducing the reliance on brokered CDs and is focused on
core deposit growth initiatives in all of the markets served.
|
|
|
|
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to
$1.6 billion as of December 31, 2009, an increase of
$50.9 million compared to the balance as of
December 31, 2008, driven by the $400 million
investment by the United States Department of the Treasury (the
U.S. Treasury) in preferred stock of the
Corporation through the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. This was partially
offset by the net loss of $275.2 million recorded for 2009,
dividends paid amounting to $43.1 million in 2009
($13.0 million on common stock, or $0.14 per share, and
$30.1 million on preferred stock) and a $30.9 million
decrease in other comprehensive income mainly due to a
noncredit-related impairment of $31.7 million on private
label MBS.
|
|
|
|
Total loan production, including purchases and refinancings, for
the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.8 billion
compared to $4.2 billion and $4.1 billion for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in loan production in 2009, as compared to 2008, was
mainly associated with a $977.9 million increase in
commercial loan originations driven by approximately
$1.7 billion in credit facilities extended to the Puerto
Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. Partially offsetting the increase in the
originations of commercial loans was a decrease of
$303.3 million in originations of consumer loans and of
$98.5 million in residential mortgage loan originations
adversely affected by weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico.
The increase in loan production in 2008, as compared to 2007,
was mainly associated with an increase in commercial loan
originations and the purchase of a $218 million auto loan
portfolio.
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets as of December 31, 2009 was
$1.71 billion compared to $637.2 million as of
December 31, 2008. Even though deterioration in credit
quality was observed in all of the Corporations
portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and
commercial loan portfolios, which were affected by both the
stagnant housing market and further weakening in the economies
of the markets served during most of 2009. The increase in
non-performing assets was led by an increase of
$518.0 million in non-performing construction loans, of
which $314.1 million is related to the construction loan
portfolio in the Puerto Rico portfolio and $205.2 million
is related to construction projects in Florida. Other portfolios
that experienced a significant growth in credit risk, mainly in
Puerto Rico, include: (i) a $183.0 million increase in
non-performing commercial and industrial (C&I) loans,
(ii) a $166.7 million increase in non-performing
residential mortgage loans, and (ii) a $110.6 million
increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans. Also,
during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing
investment securities with a book value of $64.5 million
that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., in
connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered
into with that institution. Considering that the investment
securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation,
despite its efforts, the Corporation decided to classify such
investments as non-performing. Refer to the Risk
Management Non-accruing and Non-performing
Assets section below for additional information with
respect to non-performing assets by geographic areas and recent
actions taken by the Corporation to reduce its exposure to
troubled loans.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of
applying these principles conform with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
The Corporations critical accounting policies relate to
the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses;
2) other-than-temporary
impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and
related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of
financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments;
and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical
accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions
made by management that affect the recorded assets and
liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as
of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or
conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require
greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and
judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing
results that could be materially different than those originally
reported.
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses
The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan and lease
losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses currently
inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan
and lease losses provides for probable losses that have been
identified with specific valuation allowances for individually
evaluated impaired loans and for probable losses believed to be
inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically
identified. Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business
loan at the time of approval and are subject to subsequent
periodic reviews by the Corporations senior management.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is reviewed on a
quarterly basis as part of the Corporations continued
evaluation of its asset quality
A specific valuation allowance is established for those
commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired,
primarily when the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired
loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present
value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the
loans effective rate is lower than the carrying amount of
that loan. To compute the specific valuation allowance,
commercial and real estate, including residential mortgage loans
with a principal balance of $1 million or more are
evaluated individually as well as smaller residential mortgage
loans considered impaired based on their high delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels. When foreclosure is probable, the impairment is measured
based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the
collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated
appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that
loans are impaired and are updated annually thereafter. In
addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential
mortgage loans on a spot basis based on specific
55
characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the
appraisal, and
loan-to-value
ratios. Deficiencies from the excess of the recorded investment
in collateral dependent loans over the resulting fair value of
the collateral are charged-off when deemed uncollectible.
For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans,
such as auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans,
residential mortgages, and commercial and construction loans not
considered impaired or in amounts under $1 million, the
Corporation maintains a general valuation allowance. The
methodology to compute the general valuation allowance has not
change in the past 2 years. The Corporation updates the
factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly
basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying
loss factors according to the loan type and assigned risk
category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired;
all doubtful loans are considered impaired). The general reserve
for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency
trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical
location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and
other environmental factors such as economic forecasts. The
analysis of the residential mortgage pools are performed at the
individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the
expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment
curves, default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the
pool. The severity is affected by the expected house price
scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are
used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The
risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and associated costs are
used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area in which
the property is located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or Virgin
Islands). For commercial loans, including construction loans,
the general reserve is based on historical loss ratios, trends
in non-accrual loans, loan type, risk-rating, geographical
location, changes in collateral values for collateral dependent
loans and gross product or unemployment data for the
geographical region. The methodology of accounting for all
probable losses in loans not individually measured for
impairment purposes is made in accordance with authoritative
accounting guidance that requires losses be accrued when they
are probable of occurring and estimable.
The blended general reserve factors utilized for all portfolios
increased during 2009 due to the continued deterioration in the
economy and the continued increase in delinquencies,
charge-offs, home values and most other economic indicators
utilized. The blended general reserve factor for residential
mortgage loans increased from 0.43% in 2008 to 0.91% in 2009.
For commercial mortgage loans the blended general reserve factor
increased from 0.62% in 2008 to 2.41% in 2009. For C&I
loans the blended general reserve factor increased from 1.31% in
2008 to 2.44% in 2009. The construction loans blended general
factor increased from 2.18% in 2008 to 9.82% in 2009. The
consumer and finance leases reserve factor increased from 4.31%
in 2008 to 4.36% in 2009.
Other-than-temporary
impairments
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to
determine whether there have been any events or circumstances
indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered
an
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI). A security is considered impaired
if the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis.
The Corporation evaluates if the impairment is
other-than-temporary
depending upon whether the portfolio is of fixed income
securities or equity securities as further described below. The
Corporation employs a systematic methodology that considers all
available evidence in evaluating a potential impairment of its
investments.
The impairment analysis of fixed income securities places
special emphasis on the analysis of the cash position of the
issuer and its cash and capital generation capacity, which could
increase or diminish the issuers ability to repay its bond
obligations, the length of time and the extent to which the fair
value has been less than the amortized cost basis and changes in
the near-term prospects of the underlying collateral, if
applicable, such as changes in default rates, loss severity
given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions.
In light of current volatile economic and financial market
conditions, the Corporation also takes into consideration the
latest information available about the overall financial
condition of the issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and
government actions affecting the issuers industry and
actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic
climate. In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board
(FASB) amended the OTTI model for debt securities.
OTTI losses are recognized in earnings if the Corporation has
56
the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than
not that it will be required to sell the debt security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, even if the
Corporation does not expect to sell a debt security, expected
cash flows to be received are evaluated to determine if a credit
loss has occurred. An unrealized loss is generally deemed to be
other-than-temporary
and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the
expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis
of the debt security. The credit loss component of an OTTI is
recorded as a component of Net impairment losses on investment
securities in the statements of (loss) income, while the
remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of taxes. The previous amortized cost
basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings is the new amortized
cost basis of the investment. The new amortized cost basis is
not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. However,
for debt securities for which OTTI was recognized in earnings,
the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash
flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.
Prior to April 1, 2009, an unrealized loss was considered
other-than-temporary
and recorded in earnings if (i) it was probable that the
holder would not collect all amounts due according to
contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair
value was below the amortized cost of the security for a
prolonged period of time and the Corporation did not have the
positive intent and ability to hold the security until recovery
or maturity.
The impairment model for equity securities was not affected by
the aforementioned FASB amendment. The impairment analysis of
equity securities is performed and reviewed on an ongoing basis
based on the latest financial information and any supporting
research report made by a major brokerage firm. This analysis is
very subjective and based, among other things, on relevant
financial data such as capitalization, cash flow, liquidity,
systematic risk, and debt outstanding of the issuer. Management
also considers the issuers industry trends, the historical
performance of the stock, credit ratings as well as the
Corporations intent to hold the security for an extended
period. If management believes there is a low probability of
recovering book value in a reasonable time frame, then an
impairment will be recorded by writing the security down to
market value. As previously mentioned, equity securities are
monitored on an ongoing basis but special attention is given to
those securities that have experienced a decline in fair value
for six months or more. An impairment charge is generally
recognized when the fair value of an equity security has
remained significantly below cost for a period of twelve
consecutive months or more.
Income
Taxes
The Corporation is required to estimate income taxes in
preparing its consolidated financial statements. This involves
the estimation of current income tax expense together with an
assessment of temporary differences resulting from differences
in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
The determination of current income tax expense involves
estimates and assumptions that require the Corporation to assume
certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax
regulations. Management assesses the relative benefits and risks
of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions, taking into
account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance and
recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable. Changes in
assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future
and estimated tax liabilities may need to be increased or
decreased accordingly. The accrual of tax contingencies is
adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as
the progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation.
The Corporations effective tax rate includes the impact of
tax contingencies and changes to such accruals, as considered
appropriate by management. When particular matters arise, a
number of years may elapse before such matters are audited by
the taxing authorities and finally resolved. Favorable
resolution of such matters or the expiration of the statute of
limitations may result in the release of tax contingencies which
are recognized as a reduction to the Corporations
effective rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement
of any particular issue could increase the effective rate and
may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. As of
December 31, 2009, there were no open income tax
investigations. Information regarding income taxes is included
in Note 27 to the Corporations financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on
changes in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that
generate temporary differences. The carrying value of the
Corporations net deferred
57
tax assets assumes that the Corporation will be able to generate
sufficient future taxable income based on estimates and
assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change,
the Corporation may be required to record valuation allowances
against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income
tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Management
evaluates its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and
assesses the need for a valuation allowance, if any. A valuation
allowance is established when management believes that it is
more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax
assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowance from
period to period are included in the Corporations tax
provision in the period of change (see Note 27 to the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K).
Accounting for Income Taxes requires companies to make
adjustments to their financial statements in the quarter that
new tax legislation is enacted. In 2009, the Puerto Rico
Government approved Act No. 7 (the Act), to
stimulate Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto
Rico Governments fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series
of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of
a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is
applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income
exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the
maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in
capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This
temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced
after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
Also, under the Act, all IBEs are subject to the special 5% tax
on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the
PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years
that commence after December 31, 2008 and before
January 1, 2012. The effect of a higher temporary statutory
tax rate over the normal statutory tax rate resulted in an
additional income tax benefit of $10.4 million for 2009
that was partially offset by an income tax provision of
$6.6 million related to the special 5% tax on the
operations FirstBank Overseas Corporation. For 2007 and 2008,
the maximum marginal corporate income tax rate was 39%.
The FASB issued authoritative guidance that prescribes a
comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax
uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be
taken on income tax returns. Under the authoritative accounting
guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured upon a
two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than
not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in
order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as
the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely
than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between
the benefit recognized in accordance with this model and the tax
benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an
Unrecognized Tax Benefit (UTB). The Corporation
classifies interest and penalties, if any, related to UTBs as
components of income tax expense. Refer to Note 27 of the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for required disclosures and further information related to this
accounting guidance.
Investment
Securities Classification and Related Values
Management determines the appropriate classification of debt and
equity securities at the time of purchase. Debt securities are
classified as
held-to-maturity
when the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold the
securities to maturity.
Held-to-maturity
(HTM) securities are stated at amortized cost. Debt
and equity securities are classified as trading when the
Corporation has the intent to sell the securities in the near
term. Debt and equity securities classified as trading
securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and
losses included in earnings. Debt and equity securities not
classified as HTM or trading, except for equity securities that
do not have readily available fair values, are classified as
available-for-sale
(AFS). AFS securities are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and
reported net of deferred taxes in accumulated other
comprehensive income (a component of stockholders equity)
and do not affect earnings until realized or are deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired. Investments in equity securities that do not have
publicly and readily determinable fair values are classified as
other equity securities in the statement of financial condition
and carried at the lower of cost or realizable value. The
determination of fair value applies to certain of the
Corporations assets and liabilities, including the
investment portfolio. Fair values are volatile and are affected
by factors such as market interest rates, prepayment speeds and
discount rates.
58
Valuation
of financial instruments
The measurement of fair value is fundamental to the
Corporations presentation of its financial condition and
results of operations. The Corporation holds fixed income and
equity securities, derivatives, investments and other financial
instruments at fair value. The Corporation holds its investments
and liabilities on the statement of financial condition mainly
to manage liquidity needs and interest rate risks. A substantial
part of these assets and liabilities is reflected at fair value
on the Corporations financial statements.
The Corporation adopted authoritative guidance issued by the
FASB for fair value measurements which defines fair value as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Valuations are observed from
unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for instruments measured at fair value:
Callable
Brokered CDs (Level 2 inputs)
The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included
within deposits and elected to be measured at fair value, is
determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full
term of the CDs. The valuation uses a Hull-White Interest
Rate Tree approach for the CDs with callable option
components, an industry-standard approach for valuing
instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes
that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair
value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal
amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and
swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits. The
fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance,
since the callable brokered CDs are participated out by brokers
in shares of less than $100,000 and insured by the FDIC. As of
December 31, 2009, there were no callable brokered CDs
outstanding measured at fair value since they were all called
during 2009.
Medium-Term
Notes (Level 2 inputs)
The fair value of medium-term notes is determined using a
discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the
borrowings. This valuation also uses the Hull-White
Interest Rate Tree approach to value the option components
of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options
are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes
is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount
rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and
swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. For
the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the
difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve
that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation
as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to
maturity of the note and option.
59
Investment
Securities
The fair value of investment securities is the market value
based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices
for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable
market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades,
quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids offers and
reference data including market research operations. Observable
prices in the market already consider the risk of
nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available,
fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due
to the limited market activity of the instrument (Level 3),
as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed
securities held by the Corporation. Unlike U.S. agency
mortgage-backed securities, the fair value of these private
label securities cannot be readily determined because they are
not actively traded in securities markets. Significant inputs
used for fair value determination consist of specific
characteristics such as information used in the prepayment
model, which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying
loans, which is an unobservable input.
Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by
fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in
the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to
3-month
LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a
model and represents the estimated net cash flows over the
projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a
discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads
over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a non-rated security
and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate,
default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The
Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage
collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to
collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan
term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate
adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with
prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available
prepayment model (ADCO). The variable cash flow of the security
is modeled using the
3-month
LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were driven by the
combination of default and loss severity estimates, taking into
account loan credit characteristics
(loan-to-value,
state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose,
documentation type,
debt-to-income
ratio, other) to provide an estimate of default and loss
severity. Refer to Note 4 of the Corporations
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for additional information.
Derivative
Instruments
The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on
observable market parameters and takes into consideration the
credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate,
except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate
swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts is included in the
valuation; and on options and caps, only the sellers
credit risk is considered. The Hull-White Interest Rate
Tree approach is used to value the option components of
derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is
performed using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield
curves that account for the industry sector and the credit
rating of the counterparty
and/or the
Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for
protection against rising interest rates and, prior to
June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically
hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest
rate swaps, a credit component is not considered in the
valuation since the Corporation fully collateralizes with
investment securities any
mark-to-market
loss with the counterparty and, if there are market gains, the
counterparty must deliver collateral to the Corporation.
Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case
with derivative instruments named as reference caps,
are valued using models that consider unobservable market
parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to
hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label
mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount
of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the
United States. Significant inputs used for fair value
determination consist of specific characteristics such as
information used in the prepayment model which follows the
amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an
unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula,
which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The
Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for
valuing stock options except that the spot price of the
underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula
uses as inputs the
60
strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility
estimates and discount rates to estimate the option value. LIBOR
rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) every day and build zero coupon curve
based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is
then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum
of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at the
beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the
end of each period. The cash flow of caplet is then discounted
from each payment date.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
As part of the Corporations overall interest rate risk
management, the Corporation utilizes derivative instruments,
including interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and options to
manage interest rate risk. All derivative instruments are
measured and recognized on the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition at their fair value. On the date the
derivative instrument contract is entered into, the Corporation
may designate the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair
value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized
firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge
of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows
to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge) or (3) as a
standalone derivative instrument, including economic
hedges that the Corporation has not formally documented as a
fair value or cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument that is highly effective and that is
designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with
changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that
is attributable to the hedged risk (including gains or losses on
firm commitments), are recorded in current-period earnings as
interest income or interest expense depending upon whether an
asset or liability is being hedged. Similarly, the changes in
the fair value of standalone derivative instruments or
derivatives not qualifying or designated for hedge accounting
are reported in current-period earnings as interest income or
interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is
being economically hedged. Changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument that is highly effective and that is
designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge, if any, are
recorded in other comprehensive income in the stockholders
equity section of the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition until earnings are affected by the variability of cash
flows (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset
or liability are recorded in earnings). As of December 31,
2009 and 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were
considered economic undesignated hedges recorded at fair value
with the resulting gain or loss recognized in current period
earnings.
Prior to entering into an accounting hedge transaction or
designating a hedge, the Corporation formally documents the
relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item,
as well as the risk management objective and strategy for
undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking
all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or
cash flow hedges, if any, to specific assets and liabilities on
the statements of financial condition or to specific firm
commitments or forecasted transactions along with a formal
assessment at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing
basis as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in
offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged
item. The Corporation discontinues hedge accounting
prospectively when it determines that the derivative is not
effective or will no longer be effective in offsetting changes
in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the
derivative expires, is sold, or terminated, or management
determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging
instrument is no longer appropriate. When a fair value hedge is
discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer
adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis
adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of
the asset or liability as a yield adjustment.
The Corporation occasionally purchases or originates financial
instruments that contain embedded derivatives. At inception of
the financial instrument, the Corporation assesses: (1) if
the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are
clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of
the financial instrument (host contract), (2) if the
financial instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative
and the host contract is measured at fair value with changes in
fair value reported in earnings, or (3) if a separate
instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would
not meet the definition of a derivative. If the embedded
derivative does not meet any of these conditions, it is
separated from the host contract and carried at fair value with
changes recorded in current period earnings as part of net
interest income.
61
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation elected to early
adopt authoritative guidance issued by the FASB that allows
entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value with any changes in fair value
reflected in earnings. The Corporation adopted the fair value
option for callable fixed-rate medium-term notes and callable
brokered certificates of deposit that were hedged with interest
rate swaps. One of the main considerations in the determination
to adopt the fair value option for these instruments was to
eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul
method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness
assessment, and manual procedures followed by the Corporation to
fulfill the requirements specified by authoritative guidance
issued by the FASB for derivative instruments designated as fair
value hedges.
With the Corporations elimination of the use of the
long-haul method in connection with the adoption of the fair
value option, the Corporation no longer amortizes or accretes
the basis adjustment for the financial liabilities elected to be
measured at fair value. The basis adjustment amortization or
accretion is the reversal of the basis differential between the
market value and book value recognized at the inception of fair
value hedge accounting as well as the change in value of the
hedged brokered CDs and medium-term notes recognized since the
implementation of the long-haul method. Since the time the
Corporation implemented the long-haul method, it had recognized
changes in the value of the hedged brokered CDs and medium-term
notes based on the expected call date of the instruments. The
adoption of the fair value option also required the recognition,
as part of the initial adoption adjustment to retained earnings,
of all of the unamortized placement fees that were paid to
broker counterparties upon the issuance of the elected brokered
CDs and medium-term notes. The Corporation previously amortized
those fees through earnings based on the expected call date of
the instruments. The option of using fair value accounting also
requires that the accrued interest be reported as part of the
fair value of the financial instruments elected to be measured
at fair value.
Income
Recognition on Loans
Loans are stated at the principal outstanding balance, net of
unearned interest, unamortized deferred origination fees and
costs and unamortized premiums and discounts. Fees collected and
costs incurred in the origination of new loans are deferred and
amortized using the interest method or a method which
approximates the interest method over the term of the loan as an
adjustment to interest yield. Unearned interest on certain
personal, auto loans and finance leases is recognized as income
under a method which approximates the interest method. When a
loan is paid off or sold, any unamortized net deferred fee
(cost) is credited (charged) to income.
Loans on which the recognition of interest income has been
discontinued are designated as non-accruing. When loans are
placed on non-accruing status, any accrued but uncollected
interest income is reversed and charged against interest income.
Consumer, construction, commercial and mortgage loans are
classified as non-accruing when interest and principal have not
been received for a period of 90 days or more or when there
are doubts about the potential to collect all of the principal
based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when
collection of all of the principal or interest is not expected
due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower.
Interest income on non-accruing loans is recognized only to the
extent it is received in cash. However, where there is doubt
regarding the ultimate collectability of loan principal, all
cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value
of such loans (i.e., the cost recovery method). Loans are
restored to accrual status only when future payments of interest
and principal are reasonably assured.
Loan and lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to
the allowance for loan and lease losses. Closed-end personal
consumer loans are charged-off when payments are 120 days
in arrears. Collateralized auto and finance leases are reserved
at 120 days delinquent and charged-off to their estimated
net realizable value when collateral deficiency is deemed
uncollectible (i.e. when foreclosure is probable). Open-end
(revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when payments
are 180 days in arrears.
A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current
information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will
be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and
interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. The Corporation measures impairment individually for
those commercial and construction loans with a principal balance
of $1 million or more, including loans for which a
62
charge-off has been recorded based upon the fair value of the
underlying collateral, and also evaluates for impairment
purposes certain residential mortgage loans with high
delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized based on
the Corporations policy for recognizing interest on
accrual and non-accrual loans. Impaired loans also include loans
that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as a
concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.
Troubled debt restructurings typically result from the
Corporations loss mitigation activities or programs
sponsored by the Federal Government and could include rate
reductions, principal forgiveness, forbearance and other actions
intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure
or repossession of collateral. Troubled debt restructurings are
generally reported as non-performing loans and restored to
accrual status when there is a reasonable assurance of repayment
and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period,
generally six months. However, a loan that has been formally
restructured as to be reasonably assured of repayment and of
performance according to its modified terms is not placed in
non-accruing status, provided the restructuring is supported by
a current, well documented credit evaluation of the
borrowers financial condition taking into consideration
sustained historical payment performance for a reasonable time
prior to the restructuring.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB have issued the following accounting pronouncements and
guidance relevant to the Corporations operations:
In May 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on financial
guarantee insurance contracts requiring that an insurance
enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of
default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation.
This guidance also clarifies how the accounting and reporting by
insurance entities applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used
to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. FASB
authoritative guidance on the accounting for financial guarantee
insurance contracts is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all
interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some
disclosures about the insurance enterprises
risk-management activities which are effective since the first
interim period after the issuance of this guidance. The adoption
of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the
Corporations financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for
determining whether instruments granted in shared-based payment
transactions are participating securities. This guidance applies
to entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards
that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Furthermore,
awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the
entity if the employee forfeits the award are considered
participating securities. Accordingly, under this guidance
unvested share-based payment awards that are considered to be
participating securities must be included in the computation of
earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class
method as required by FASB guidance on earnings per share. FASB
guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share
based payment transactions are participating securities is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those years. The adoption of this Statement did not have
an impact on the Corporations financial statements since,
as of December 31, 2009, the outstanding unvested shares of
restricted stock do not contain rights to nonforfeitable
dividends.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the
accounting of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies. This
guidance amends the provisions related to the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. The guidance carries forward the
requirement that acquired contingencies in a business
combination be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date
if fair value can be reasonably estimated during the allocation
period. Otherwise, entities would typically account for the
acquired contingencies based on a reasonable estimate in
accordance with FASB guidance on the accounting for
contingencies. This guidance is effective for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement did not
have an impact on the Corporations financial statements.
63
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for
determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for
the asset or liability have significantly decreased and
identifying transactions that are not orderly. This guidance
relates to determining fair values when there is no active
market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed
sales. It reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement,
that is, to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an
orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced
transaction) at the date of the financial statements under
current market conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need
to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has
become inactive and in determining fair values when markets have
become inactive. This guidance is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a
prospective basis. The adoption of this Statement did not impact
the Corporations fair value methodologies on its financial
assets and liabilities.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on
determining whether an impairment for investments in debt
securities is OTTI and requires an entity to recognize the
credit component of an OTTI of a debt security in earnings and
the noncredit component in other comprehensive income
(OCI) when the entity does not intend to sell the
security and it is more likely than not that the entity will not
be required to sell the security prior to recovery. This
guidance also requires expanded disclosures and became effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. In connection with this guidance, the
Corporation recorded $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 of OTTI charges through earnings that
represents the credit loss of
available-for-sale
private label mortgage-backed securities. This guidance does not
amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
an OTTI of equity securities. The expanded disclosures related
to this new guidance are included in Note 4 of the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
disclosure about fair values of financial instruments, which
requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments, in both interim financial statements as well as
annual financial statements. This guidance became effective for
interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of the amended guidance expanded the Corporations
interim financial statement disclosures with regard to the fair
value of financial instruments.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on
subsequent events, which establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. This guidance sets forth
(i) the period after the balance sheet date during which
management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements and (iii) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. This guidance is effective for
interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15,
2009. There are not any material subsequent event that would
require further disclosure.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
accounting for transfers of financial assets, which improves the
relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the
effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This
guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first
annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting
periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB
amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the
most significant changes and additions to this guidance includes
changes to the conditions for sales of a financial assets which
objective is to determine whether a transferor and its
consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements
have surrendered control over transferred financial assets or
third-party beneficial interests; and the addition of the
meaning of the term participating interest which represents a
proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The Corporation is evaluating the impact the
adoption of the guidance will have on its financial statements.
64
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
consolidation of variable interest, which improves financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities and addresses (i) the effects on certain
provisions of the amended guidance, as a result of the
elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in
the accounting for transfer of financial assets guidance and
(ii) constituent concerns about the application of certain
key provisions of the guidance, including those in which the
accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely and
useful information about an enterprises involvement in a
variable interest entity. This guidance is effective as of the
beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in
December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in
June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to
this guidance includes the replacement of the quantitative-based
risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting
entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying
which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of
a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the
entity. The Corporation is evaluating the impact, if any, the
adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (Codification) is the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities
laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
The Codification project does not change GAAP in any way shape
or form; it only reorganizes the existing pronouncements into
one single source of U.S. GAAP. This guidance is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as
described in this guidance. All other accounting literature not
included in the Codification is nonauthoritative. Following this
guidance, the FASB will not issue new guidance in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates
(ASUs). The FASB will not consider ASUs as
authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update
the Codification, provide background information about the
guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s)
in the Codification.
In August 2009, the FASB updated the Codification in connection
with the fair value measurement of liabilities to clarify that
in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for
the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is
required to measure fair value using one or more of the
following techniques:
1. A valuation technique that uses:
a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded
as an asset
b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar
liabilities when traded as assets
2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of fair value measurement. Two examples would be an
income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market
approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the
measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer
the identical liability or would receive to enter into the
identical liability.
The update also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of
a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a
separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the
existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the
liability. The update also clarifies that both a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability at the measurement
date and the quoted price for the identical liability when
traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustment to the
quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair
value measurements. This update is effective for the first
reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after
issuance. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the
Corporations fair value methodologies on its financial
liabilities
65
In September 2009, the FASB updated the Codification to reflect
SEC staff pronouncements on
earnings-per-share
calculations. According to the update, the SEC staff believes
that when a public company redeems preferred shares, the
difference between the fair value of the consideration
transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the
carrying amount on the balance sheet after issuance costs of the
preferred stock should be added to or subtracted from net income
before doing an earnings per share calculation. The SECs
staff also thinks it is not appropriate to aggregate preferred
shares with different dividend yields when trying to determine
whether the if-converted method is dilutive to the
earnings per-share calculation. As of December 31, 2009,
the Corporation has not been involved in a redemption or induced
conversion of preferred stock.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
guidance on accounting for distributions to shareholders with
components of stock and cash. This guidance clarifies that the
stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them
to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on
the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to
receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is
reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend . The
new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending
on or after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a
retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not
impact the Corporations financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to fair
value measurements and require reporting entities to make new
disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value
measurements including significant transfers into and out of
Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and
information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a
gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value
measurements. The FASB also clarified existing fair-value
measurement disclosure guidance about the level of
disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. Entities will
be required to separately disclose significant transfers into
and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the
fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers.
Significance will be determined based on earnings and total
assets or total liabilities or, when changes in fair value are
recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity.
A reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its
policy for determining when transfers between levels are
recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize
transfers include: (i) actual date of the event or change
in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii) beginning of
the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting
period. Currently, entities are only required to disclose
activity in Level 3 measurements in the fair-value
hierarchy on a net basis. This guidance will require separate
disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of
assets. Entities will also have to disclose the reasons for the
activity and apply the same guidance on significance and
transfer policies required for transfers between Level 1
and 2 measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of
fair-value measurements by class instead of
major category. A class is generally a subset of
assets and liabilities within a financial statement line item
and is based on the specific nature and risks of the assets and
liabilities and their classification in the fair-value
hierarchy. When determining classes, reporting entities must
also consider the level of disaggregated information required by
other applicable GAAP. For fair-value measurements using
significant observable inputs (Level 2) or significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3), this guidance requires
reporting entities to disclose the valuation technique and the
inputs used in determining fair value for each class of assets
and liabilities. If the valuation technique has changed in the
reporting period (e.g., from a market approach to an income
approach) or if an additional valuation technique is used,
entities are required to disclose the change and the reason for
making the change. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll
forward disclosures, the guidance is effective for annual and
interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009
(first quarter of 2010 for public companies with calendar
year-ends). The new disclosures about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity for
Level 3 fair-value measurements are effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2010 (first quarter of 2011 for public companies with calendar
year-ends). Early adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption
period, entities are not required to include disclosures for
previous comparative periods; however, they are required for
periods ending after initial adoption. The Corporation is
evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on
its financial statements.
66
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
Interest Income
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First
BanCorp on its interest-earning assets over the interest
incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First
BanCorps net interest income is subject to interest rate
risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the
Corporations assets and liabilities. Net interest income
for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$519.0 million, compared to $527.9 million and
$451.0 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. On an
adjusted tax equivalent basis and excluding the changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains and
losses on liabilities measured at fair value, net interest
income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$567.2 million, compared to $579.1 million and
$475.4 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest
income. Part I presents average volumes and rates on an
adjusted tax equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on
an adjusted tax equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in
interest rates and changes in volume of interest-related assets
and liabilities have affected the Corporations net
interest income. For each category of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on
changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in
volume multiplied by prior period rates), and (ii) changes
in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior period volumes).
Rate-volume variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in
volume) have been allocated to the changes in volume and rate
based upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.
The net interest income is computed on an adjusted tax
equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this
non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding:
(1) the change in the fair value of derivative instruments,
and (2) unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured
at fair value.
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume
|
|
|
Interest Income(1)/Expense
|
|
|
Average Rate(1)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
182,205
|
|
|
$
|
286,502
|
|
|
$
|
440,598
|
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
|
$
|
6,355
|
|
|
$
|
22,155
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
5.03
|
%
|
Government obligations(2)
|
|
|
1,345,591
|
|
|
|
1,402,738
|
|
|
|
2,687,013
|
|
|
|
54,323
|
|
|
|
93,539
|
|
|
|
159,572
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
6.67
|
%
|
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,254,044
|
|
|
|
3,923,423
|
|
|
|
2,296,855
|
|
|
|
238,992
|
|
|
|
244,150
|
|
|
|
117,383
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
6.22
|
%
|
|
|
5.11
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
6.16
|
%
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
76,982
|
|
|
|
65,081
|
|
|
|
46,291
|
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
|
|
3,710
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.18
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
8,133
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments(3)
|
|
|
5,865,662
|
|
|
|
5,689,217
|
|
|
|
5,486,601
|
|
|
|
297,394
|
|
|
|
348,371
|
|
|
|
302,484
|
|
|
|
5.07
|
%
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
3,523,576
|
|
|
|
3,351,236
|
|
|
|
2,914,626
|
|
|
|
213,583
|
|
|
|
215,984
|
|
|
|
188,294
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
6.46
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,590,309
|
|
|
|
1,485,126
|
|
|
|
1,467,621
|
|
|
|
52,908
|
|
|
|
82,513
|
|
|
|
121,917
|
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
|
|
8.31
|
%
|
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
6,343,635
|
|
|
|
5,473,716
|
|
|
|
4,797,440
|
|
|
|
263,935
|
|
|
|
314,931
|
|
|
|
362,714
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
341,943
|
|
|
|
373,999
|
|
|
|
379,510
|
|
|
|
28,077
|
|
|
|
31,962
|
|
|
|
33,153
|
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
8.55
|
%
|
|
|
8.74
|
%
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,661,099
|
|
|
|
1,709,512
|
|
|
|
1,729,548
|
|
|
|
188,775
|
|
|
|
197,581
|
|
|
|
202,616
|
|
|
|
11.36
|
%
|
|
|
11.56
|
%
|
|
|
11.71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans(4)(5)
|
|
|
13,460,562
|
|
|
|
12,393,589
|
|
|
|
11,288,745
|
|
|
|
747,278
|
|
|
|
842,971
|
|
|
|
908,694
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
6.80
|
%
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
19,326,224
|
|
|
$
|
18,082,806
|
|
|
$
|
16,775,346
|
|
|
$
|
1,044,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,211,178
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
%
|
|
|
6.59
|
%
|
|
|
7.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume
|
|
|
Interest Income(1)/Expense
|
|
|
Average Rate(1)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts
|
|
$
|
866,464
|
|
|
$
|
580,572
|
|
|
$
|
443,420
|
|
|
$
|
19,995
|
|
|
$
|
12,914
|
|
|
$
|
11,365
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
1,540,473
|
|
|
|
1,217,730
|
|
|
|
1,020,399
|
|
|
|
19,032
|
|
|
|
18,916
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
|
|
1.55
|
%
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,680,325
|
|
|
|
1,812,957
|
|
|
|
1,652,430
|
|
|
|
50,939
|
|
|
|
73,466
|
|
|
|
82,761
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
Brokered CDs
|
|
|
7,300,696
|
|
|
|
7,671,094
|
|
|
|
7,639,470
|
|
|
|
227,896
|
|
|
|
318,199
|
|
|
|
415,287
|
|
|
|
3.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
11,387,958
|
|
|
|
11,282,353
|
|
|
|
10,755,719
|
|
|
|
317,862
|
|
|
|
423,495
|
|
|
|
524,450
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
643,618
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
3,745,980
|
|
|
|
3,864,189
|
|
|
|
3,449,492
|
|
|
|
124,340
|
|
|
|
148,753
|
|
|
|
172,890
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
1,322,136
|
|
|
|
1,120,782
|
|
|
|
723,596
|
|
|
|
32,954
|
|
|
|
39,739
|
|
|
|
38,464
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities(6)
|
|
$
|
17,099,692
|
|
|
$
|
16,278,116
|
|
|
$
|
14,928,807
|
|
|
$
|
477,487
|
|
|
$
|
612,230
|
|
|
$
|
735,804
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
567,185
|
|
|
$
|
579,112
|
|
|
$
|
475,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The tax-equivalent yield
was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on exempt
assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as adjusted
for changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the
Corporations subsidiaries other than IBEs in 2009, 35.95%
for the Corporations IBEs in 2009 and 39% for all
subsidiaries in 2008 and 2007) and adding to it the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities. The tax-equivalent adjustment
recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and
tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard
practice in the banking industry to present net interest income,
interest rate spread and net interest margin on a fully
tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these
measures provide useful information to investors by allowing
them to make peer comparisons. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on
liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from interest
income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do
not affect interest paid or received. |
|
(2) |
|
Government obligations include debt issued by government
sponsored agencies. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses in
available-for-sale
securities are excluded from the average volumes. |
|
(4) |
|
Average loan balances include the average of non-accruing loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest income on loans includes $11.2 million,
$10.2 million, and $11.1 million for 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late
fees related to the Corporations loan portfolio. |
|
(6) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair
value are excluded from the average volumes. |
68
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Compared to 2008
|
|
|
2008 Compared to 2007
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to:
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to:
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
(1,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,778
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,718
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,800
|
)
|
Government obligations
|
|
|
(3,672
|
)
|
|
|
(35,544
|
)
|
|
|
(39,216
|
)
|
|
|
(80,954
|
)
|
|
|
14,921
|
|
|
|
(66,033
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
19,474
|
|
|
|
(24,632
|
)
|
|
|
(5,158
|
)
|
|
|
97,011
|
|
|
|
29,756
|
|
|
|
126,767
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(1,206
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
849
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
14,402
|
|
|
|
(65,379
|
)
|
|
|
(50,977
|
)
|
|
|
11,061
|
|
|
|
34,826
|
|
|
|
45,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
|
(13,117
|
)
|
|
|
(2,401
|
)
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
27,690
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
(34,286
|
)
|
|
|
(29,605
|
)
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
(40,618
|
)
|
|
|
(39,404
|
)
|
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
43,028
|
|
|
|
(94,024
|
)
|
|
|
(50,996
|
)
|
|
|
45,020
|
|
|
|
(92,803
|
)
|
|
|
(47,783
|
)
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
(1,231
|
)
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
(5,466
|
)
|
|
|
(3,340
|
)
|
|
|
(8,806
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,703
|
)
|
|
|
(5,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
50,305
|
|
|
|
(145,998
|
)
|
|
|
(95,693
|
)
|
|
|
71,598
|
|
|
|
(137,321
|
)
|
|
|
(65,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
64,707
|
|
|
|
(211,377
|
)
|
|
|
(146,670
|
)
|
|
|
82,659
|
|
|
|
(102,495
|
)
|
|
|
(19,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs
|
|
|
(14,707
|
)
|
|
|
(75,596
|
)
|
|
|
(90,303
|
)
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
(98,679
|
)
|
|
|
(97,088
|
)
|
Other interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,285
|
|
|
|
(27,615
|
)
|
|
|
(15,330
|
)
|
|
|
21,551
|
|
|
|
(25,418
|
)
|
|
|
(3,867
|
)
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
(6,177
|
)
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
(4,439
|
)
|
|
|
(19,974
|
)
|
|
|
(24,413
|
)
|
|
|
18,327
|
|
|
|
(42,464
|
)
|
|
|
(24,137
|
)
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
6,122
|
|
|
|
(12,907
|
)
|
|
|
(6,785
|
)
|
|
|
17,599
|
|
|
|
(16,324
|
)
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
(142,269
|
)
|
|
|
(134,743
|
)
|
|
|
59,311
|
|
|
|
(182,885
|
)
|
|
|
(123,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$
|
57,181
|
|
|
$
|
(69,108
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,927
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,348
|
|
|
$
|
80,390
|
|
|
$
|
103,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the Corporations interest-earning assets,
mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. Government
agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is
exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also,
interest and gains on sale of investments held by the
Corporations international banking entities are tax-exempt
under the Puerto Rico tax law (refer to the Income Taxes
discussion below for additional information regarding recent
legislation that imposes a temporary 5% tax rate on IBEs
net income). To facilitate the comparison of all interest data
related to these assets, the interest income has been converted
to an adjusted taxable equivalent basis. The tax equivalent
yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on
exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as
adjusted for recent changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the
Corporations subsidiaries other than IBEs in 2009, 35.95%
for the Corporations IBEs in 2009 and 39% for all
subsidiaries in 2008 and 2007) and adding to it the average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers
the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax
law. Refer to Income Taxes discussion below for
additional information of the Puerto Rico tax law.
The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of
the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and
unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value
provides additional
69
information about the Corporations net interest income and
facilitates comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair
value of the derivative instruments and unrealized gains or
losses on liabilities measured at fair value have no effect on
interest due or interest earned on interest-bearing assets or
interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, or on interest
payments exchanged with interest rate swap counterparties.
The following table reconciles the interest income on an
adjusted tax-equivalent basis set forth in Part I above to
interest income set forth in the Consolidated Statements of
(Loss) Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets on an adjusted
tax-equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
1,044,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,191,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,211,178
|
|
Less: tax equivalent adjustments
|
|
|
(53,617
|
)
|
|
|
(56,408
|
)
|
|
|
(15,293
|
)
|
Plus (less): net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives
|
|
|
5,519
|
|
|
|
(8,037
|
)
|
|
|
(6,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
996,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,189,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in
fair values of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, which
are included in interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
$
|
3,496
|
|
|
$
|
(4,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,985
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps on loans
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
(3,696
|
)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges)
|
|
$
|
5,519
|
|
|
$
|
(8,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of interest
expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007. As previously stated, the net interest margin analysis
excludes the changes in the fair value of derivatives and
unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
460,128
|
|
|
$
|
632,134
|
|
|
$
|
713,918
|
|
Net interest (realized) incurred on interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(5,499
|
)
|
|
|
(35,569
|
)
|
|
|
12,323
|
|
Amortization of placement fees on brokered CDs
|
|
|
22,858
|
|
|
|
15,665
|
|
|
|
9,056
|
|
Amortization of placement fees on medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense excluding net unrealized loss (gain) on
derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized
(gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value,
|
|
|
477,487
|
|
|
|
612,230
|
|
|
|
735,804
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges) and liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
(13,214
|
)
|
|
|
4,488
|
|
Accretion of basis adjustment
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
$
|
477,532
|
|
|
$
|
599,016
|
|
|
$
|
738,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The following table summarizes the components of the net
unrealized gain and loss on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges) and net unrealized gain and loss on liabilities measured
at fair value which are included in interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
5,321
|
|
|
$
|
(62,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,826
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on medium-term notes
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges)
|
|
|
5,520
|
|
|
|
(63,248
|
)
|
|
|
(66,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on brokered CDs
|
|
|
(8,696
|
)
|
|
|
54,199
|
|
|
|
71,116
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on medium-term notes
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
(4,165
|
)
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
(5,475
|
)
|
|
|
50,034
|
|
|
|
70,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges) and liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
(13,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of the accretion
of basis adjustment which are included in interest expense in
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accreation of basis adjustments on fair value hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps on brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps on medium-term notes
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of basis adjustment on fair value hedges
|
|
$
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents
interest earned on loans receivable and investment securities.
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily
represents interest paid on brokered CDs, branch-based deposits,
advances from the FHLB and FED, repurchase agreements and notes
payable.
Net interest incurred or realized on interest rate swaps
primarily represents net interest exchanged on swaps that
economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
The amortization of broker placement fees represents the
amortization of fees paid to brokers upon issuance of related
financial instruments (i.e., brokered CDs not elected for the
fair value option). For 2007, the amortization of broker
placement fees includes the derecognition of the unamortized
balance of placement fees related to a $150 million note
redeemed prior to its contractual maturity during the second
quarter as well as the amortization of placement fees for
brokered CDs not elected for the fair value option.
Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represents changes in
the fair value of derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps,
that economically hedge liabilities (i.e., brokered CDs and
medium-term notes) or assets (i.e., loans and investments).
Unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value
represents the change in the fair value of such liabilities
(medium-term notes and brokered CDs), other than the accrual of
interests.
71
For 2007, the basis adjustment represents the basis differential
between the market value and the book value of a
$150 million medium-term note recognized at the inception
of fair value hedge accounting on April 3, 2006, as well as
changes in fair value recognized after the inception until the
discontinuance of fair value hedge accounting on January 1,
2007, which was amortized or accreted based on the expected
maturity of the liability as a yield adjustment. The unamortized
balance of the basis adjustment was derecognized as part of the
redemption of the $150 million note resulting in an
adjustment to earnings of $1.9 million recognized as an
accretion of basis adjustment, during the second quarter of 2007.
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject
to market risk. While the Corporation does have certain trading
derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the Corporation
does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative
purposes. As of December 31, 2009, most of the interest
rate swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising
interest rates. In the past, the volume of interest rate swaps
was much higher, as they were used to convert the fixed-rate of
a large portfolio of brokered CDs, mainly those with long-term
maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate
risk related to variable rate loans. However, most of these
interest rate swaps were called during 2009, due to lower
interest rate levels. Refer to Note 32 of the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further details concerning the notional amounts of
derivative instruments and additional information. As is the
case with investment securities, the market value of derivative
instruments is largely a function of the financial markets
expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates.
Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily
indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on net
interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on the
shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well
as the expectations for rates in the future.
2009
compared to 2008
Net interest income decreased 2% to $519.0 million for 2009
from $527.9 million for 2008 adversely impacted by a
27 basis points decrease, on an adjusted tax-equivalent
basis, in the Corporation net interest margin. The
decrease in the yield of the Corporations average
interest-earning assets declined more than the cost of the
average interest-bearing liabilities. The yield on
interest-earning assets decreased 118 basis points to 5.41%
for 2009 from 6.59% for 2008. The decrease was primarily the
result of a lower yield on average loans which decreased
125 basis points to 5.55% for 2009 from 6.80% for 2008. The
decrease in the yield on average loans was primarily due to the
increase in non-accrual loans which resulted in the reversal of
accrued interest. Also contributing to a lower yield on average
loans was the decline in market interest rates that resulted in
reductions in interest income from variable rate loans,
primarily commercial and construction loans tied to short-term
indexes, even though the Corporation is actively increasing
spreads on loans renewals. The Corporation increased the use of
interest rate floors in new commercial and construction loans
agreements and renewals in 2009 to protect net interest margins
going forward. The average
3-month
LIBOR for 2009 was 0.69% compared to 2.93% for 2008 and the
Prime Rate for 2009 was 3.25% compared to an average of 5.08%
for 2008. Lower yields were also observed in the investment
securities portfolio, driven by the approximately
$946 million of U.S. agency debentures called in 2009
and MBS prepayments, which were replaced with lower yielding
investments financed with very low-cost sources of funding.
The cost of average-interest bearing liabilities decreased 97
basis to 2.79% for 2009 from 3.76% for 2008, primarily due to
the decline short-term rates and changes in the mix of funding
sources. The weighted-average cost of brokered CDs decreased
103 basis points to 3.12% for 2009 from 4.15% for 2008
primarily due to the replacement of maturing or callable
brokered CDs that had interest rates above current market rates
with shorter-term brokered CDs. Also, as a result of the general
decline in market interest rates, lower interest rates were paid
on existing customer money market and savings accounts coupled
with lower interest rates paid on new deposits. In addition, the
Corporation increased the use of short-term advances from the
FHLB and the FED. The Corporation increased its short-term
borrowings as a measure of interest rate risk management to
match the shortening in the average life of the investment
portfolio and shifted the funding emphasis to retail deposit to
reduce reliance on brokered CDs.
Partially offsetting the compression in net interest margin, was
an increase of $1.2 billion in average interest-earning
assets. The higher volume of average interest-earning assets was
driven by the growth of the
72
C&I loan portfolio in Puerto Rico, primarily due to credit
facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its
political subdivisions. Also, funds obtained through short-term
borrowings were invested, in part, in the purchase of investment
securities to mitigate the decline in the average yield on
securities that resulted from the acceleration of MBS
prepayments and calls of U.S. agency debentures.
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, net interest income
decreased by $11.9 million, or 2%, for 2009 compared to
2008. The decrease was principally due to lower yields on
earning-assets as described above and a decrease of
$2.8 million in the tax-equivalent adjustment. The
tax-equivalent adjustment increases interest income on
tax-exempt securities and loans by an amount which makes
tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the
Corporations taxable income as previously stated. The
decrease in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly related to
decreases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets,
mainly due to lower yields on U.S. agency debentures an MBS
held by the Corporations IBE subsidiary, as the
Corporation replaced securities called and sold as well as
prepayments of MBS with shorter-term securities, and due to the
decrease in income tax savings on securities held by FirstBank
Overseas Corporation resulting from the temporary 5% tax imposed
in 2009 to all IBEs (see Income Taxes discussion below).
2008
compared to 2007
Net interest income increased 17% to $527.9 million for
2008 from $451.0 million for 2007. Approximately
$14.2 million of the total net interest income increase was
related to fluctuations in the fair value of derivative
instruments and financial liabilities measured at fair value.
The Corporations net interest spread and margin for 2008,
on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, were 2.83% and 3.20%,
respectively, up 54 and 37 basis points from 2007. The
increase was mainly associated with a decrease in the average
cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates
and, to a lesser extent, a higher volume of interest earning
assets. During 2008, the target for the Federal Funds rate was
lowered from 4.25% to a range of 0% to 0.25% through seven
separate actions in an attempt to stimulate the
U.S. economy, officially in recession since December 2007.
The decrease in funding costs more than offset lower loan yields
resulting from the repricing of variable-rate construction and
commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and from a higher
volume of non-accrual loans.
Average earning assets for 2008 increased by $1.3 billion,
as compared to 2007, driven by commercial and residential real
estate loan originations, and, to a lesser extent, purchases of
loans during 2008 that contributed to a wider spread. In
addition, the Corporation purchased approximately
$3.2 billion in U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS
having an average yield of 5.44% during 2008, which is higher
than the cost of the borrowing required to finance the purchase
of such assets, thus contributing to a higher net interest
income as compared to 2007. The increase in the loan and MBS
portfolio was partially offset by the early redemption, through
call exercises, of approximately $1.2 billion of
U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.87% due
to the drop in rates in the long end of the yield curve.
On the funding side, the average cost of the Corporations
interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 117 basis points
mainly due to lower short-term rates and the mix of borrowings.
The benefit from the decline in short-term rates in 2008 was
partially offset by the Corporations strategy, in managing
its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of
changes in interest rates on net interest income, of reducing
its exposure to high levels of market volatility by, among other
things, extending the duration of its borrowings and replacing
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs that matured or were called (due to lower
short-term rates) with brokered CDs not hedged with interest
rate swaps. Also, the Corporation has reduced its interest rate
risk through other funding sources and by, among other things,
entering into long-term and structured repurchase agreements
that replaced short-term borrowings. The volume of
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs decreased by approximately $3.0 billion to
$1.1 billion as of December 31, 2008 from
$4.1 billion as of December 31, 2007.
On the asset side, the average yield of the Corporations
interest-earning assets decreased by 63 basis points driven
by lower yields on the variable-rate commercial and construction
loan portfolio. The weighted-average yield on loans decreased by
125 basis points during 2008. In the latter part of 2008,
the Corporation took initial steps to obtain higher pricing on
its variable-rate commercial loan portfolio; however, this
effort was severely impacted by significant declines in
short-term rates during the last quarter of 2008 (the Prime
73
Rate dropped to 3.25% from 7.25% at December 31, 2007 and
3-month
LIBOR closed at 1.43% on December 31, 2008 from 4.70% on
December 31, 2007) and, to a lesser extent, by the
increase in the volume of non-performing loans. Lower loans
yields were partially offset by higher yields on tax-exempt
securities such as U.S. agency MBS held by the
Corporations international banking entity subsidiary.
On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, net interest income
increased by $103.7 million, or 22%, for 2008 compared to
2007. The increase was principally due to the lower short-term
rates discussed above but also was positively impacted by a
$41.1 million increase in the tax-equivalent adjustment.
The increase in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly related
to increases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets
due to lower short-term rates and a higher volume of tax-exempt
MBS held by the Corporations international banking entity
subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation.
Provision
for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings
to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level
that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable
losses inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance
for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of
additional factors including trends in charge-offs and
delinquencies, current economic conditions, the fair value of
the underlying collateral and the financial condition of the
borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and
estimates made by the Corporation. Although the Corporation
believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is
adequate, factors beyond the Corporations control,
including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the
United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the British
Virgin Islands, may contribute to delinquencies and defaults,
thus necessitating additional reserves.
During 2009, the Corporation recorded a provision for loan and
lease losses of $579.9 million, compared to
$190.9 million in 2008 and $120.6 million in 2007.
2009
compared to 2008
The increase, as compared to 2008, was mainly related to:
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in specific reserves for construction and commercial
impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
Increases in non-performing and net charge-offs levels.
|
|
|
|
The migration of loans to higher risk categories, thus requiring
higher general reserves.
|
|
|
|
The overall growth of the loan portfolio.
|
Even though the deterioration in credit quality was observed in
all of the Corporations portfolios, it was more
significant in the construction and C&I loan portfolios,
which were affected by the stagnant housing market and further
deterioration in the economies of the markets served. The
provision for loan losses for the construction loan portfolio
increased by $211.1 million and the provision for the
C&I loan portfolio increased by $110.6 million
compared to 2008. This increase accounts for approximately 83%
of the increase in the provision. As mentioned above, the
increase was mainly driven by the migration of loans to higher
risk categories, increases in specific reserves for impaired
loans, and increases to loss factors used to determine the
general reserve to account for negative trends in non-performing
loans, charge-offs affected by declines in collateral values and
economic indicators. The provision for residential mortgages
also increased significantly for 2009, as compared to 2008, an
increase of $32 million, as a result of updating general
reserve factors and a higher portfolio of delinquent loans
evaluated for impairment purposes that was adversely impacted by
decreases in collateral values.
In terms of geography, the Corporation recorded a
$366.0 million provision in 2009 for its loan portfolio in
Puerto Rico compared to $125.0 million in 2008, an increase
of $241.0 million mainly related to the C&I and
construction loans portfolio. The provision for C&I loans
in Puerto Rico increased by $116.5 million and the
provision for the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico
increased by $101.3 million. Rising unemployment and the
depressed economy negatively impacted borrowers and was
reflected in a persistent decline in the volume of new housing
sales and underperformance of important sectors of the economy.
74
With respect to the United States loan portfolio, the
Corporation recorded a $188.7 million provision in 2009
compared to a $53.4 million provision in 2008, an increase
of $135.3 million mainly related to the construction loan
portfolio. The provision for construction loans in the United
States increased by $95.0 million compared to 2008,
primarily due to charges against specific reserves for impaired
construction projects, mainly collateral dependent loans that
were charged-off to their collateral value in 2009 (refer to the
Risk Management Credit Risk
Management Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and
Non-performing Assets discussion below for additional
information about charge-offs recorded in 2009). Impaired loans
in the United States increased from $210.1 million at
December 31, 2008 to $461.1 million by the end of
2009. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 89%, or
$265.1 million of the total exposure to construction loans
in Florida was individually measured for impairment.
The provision recorded for the loan portfolio in the Virgin
Islands amounted to $25.2 million in 2009, an increase of
$12.7 million compared to 2008 mainly related to the
construction loan portfolio.
Refer to the discussions under Risk Management
Credit Risk Management Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses and Non-performing Assets below for analysis of the
allowance for loan and lease losses, non-performing assets,
impaired loans and related information.
2008
compared to 2007
The increase, as compared to 2007, was mainly attributable to
the significant increase in delinquency levels and increases in
specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans
adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in the
United States and Puerto Rico. Also, increases to reserve
factors for potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio,
higher reserves for the residential mortgage loan portfolio in
the U.S. mainland and Puerto Rico and the overall growth of
the Corporations loan portfolio contributed to higher
charges in 2008.
During 2008, the Corporation experienced continued stress in the
credit quality of and worsening trends on its construction loan
portfolio, in particular, condo-conversion loans affected by the
continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an
oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the
United States. The total exposure of the Corporation to
condo-conversion loans in the United States was approximately
$197.4 million or less than 2% of the total loan portfolio.
A total of approximately $154.4 million of this condo
conversion portfolio was considered impaired with a specific
reserve of $36.0 million allocated to these impaired loans
during 2008. Absorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the
United States were low and properties collateralizing some loans
originally disbursed as condo-conversion were formally reverted
to rental properties with a future plan for the sale of
converted units upon an improvement in the United States real
estate market. Higher reserves were also necessary for the
residential mortgage loan portfolio in the U.S. mainland in
light of increased delinquency levels and the decrease in
housing prices.
In Puerto Rico, the Corporations impaired commercial and
construction loan portfolio amounted to approximately
$164 million and $106 million, respectively, with
specific reserves of $21 million and $19 million,
respectively, allocated to these loans during 2008. The
Corporation also increased its reserves for the residential
mortgage and construction loan portfolio from the 2007 levels to
account for the increased credit risk tied to recessionary
conditions in Puerto Ricos economy.
Refer to the discussions under Financial Condition and
Operating Analysis Lending Activities and
under Risk Management Credit Risk
Management below for additional information concerning the
Corporations loan portfolio exposure to the geographic
areas where the Corporation does business.
75
Non-interest
Income
The following table presents the composition of non-interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other service charges on loans
|
|
$
|
6,830
|
|
|
$
|
6,309
|
|
|
$
|
6,893
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
13,307
|
|
|
|
12,895
|
|
|
|
12,769
|
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
8,605
|
|
|
|
3,273
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
Insurance income
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
10,157
|
|
|
|
10,877
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
18,362
|
|
|
|
18,570
|
|
|
|
13,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income before net gain (loss) on investments,
insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a
contingency settlement, net gain on partial extinguishment and
recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local
financial institutions and gain on sale of credit card portfolio
|
|
|
57,118
|
|
|
|
53,450
|
|
|
|
49,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on VISA shares and related proceeds
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
|
|
9,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
83,020
|
|
|
|
17,706
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
OTTI on equity securities and corporate bonds
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(5,987
|
)
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
OTTI on debt securities
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
85,146
|
|
|
|
21,193
|
|
|
|
(2,726
|
)
|
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a
contingency settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
Gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured
commercial loans to local financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
142,264
|
|
|
$
|
74,643
|
|
|
$
|
67,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income primarily consists of other service charges
on loans; service charges on deposit accounts; commissions
derived from various banking, securities and insurance
activities; gains and losses on mortgage banking activities; and
net gains and losses on investments and impairments.
Other service charges on loans consist mainly of service charges
on credit card-related activities and other non-deferrable fees
(e.g. agent, commitment and drawing fees).
Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees and
other fees on deposit accounts.
Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales
and securitization of loans and revenues earned for
administering residential mortgage loans originated by the
Corporation and subsequently sold with servicing retained. In
addition,
lower-of-cost-or-market
valuation adjustments to the Corporations residential
mortgage loans held for sale portfolio and servicing rights
portfolio, if any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking
activities.
Rental income represents income generated by the
Corporations subsidiary, First Leasing, on the rental of
various types of motor vehicles. As part of its strategies to
focus on its core business, the Corporation divested its
short-term rental business during the fourth quarter of 2009.
Insurance income consists of insurance commissions earned by the
Corporations subsidiary, FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc.,
and the Banks subsidiary in the U.S. Virgin Islands,
FirstBank Insurance V.I., Inc. These subsidiaries offer a wide
variety of insurance business.
76
The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous
fees such as debit, credit card and point of sale (POS)
interchange fees and check and cash management fees and includes
commissions from the Corporations broker-dealer
subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities.
The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or
losses as a result of sales that are consistent with the
Corporations investment policies as well as
other-than-temporary impairment charges (OTTI) on the
Corporations investment portfolio.
2009
compared to 2008
Non-interest income increased $67.6 million to
$142.3 million for 2009, primarily reflecting:
|
|
|
|
|
A $59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of
investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million
gain on the sale of MBS (mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate
MBS), compared to realized gains on the sale of MBS of
$17.7 million in 2008. In an effort to manage interest rate
risk, and take advantage of favorable market valuations,
approximately $1.8 billion of U.S. agency MBS (mainly
30 Year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS) were sold in 2009,
compared to approximately $526 million of U.S. agency
MBS sold in 2008.
|
|
|
|
A $5.3 million increase in gains from mortgage banking
activities, due to the increased volume of loan sales and
securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of sale
amounted to $6.1 million for 2009 compared to
$1.6 million for 2008. The increase is mainly related to
$4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection
with the securitization of approximately $305 million
FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in
several years, the Corporation has been engaged in the
securitization of mortgage loans in 2009.
|
|
|
|
A $5.6 million decrease in OTTI charges related to equity
securities and corporate bonds, partially offset by OTTI charges
through earnings of $1.3 million in 2009 related to the
credit loss portion of available-for-sale private label MBS.
|
Also contributing to the increase in non-interest income was
higher fee income, mainly fees on loans and service charges on
deposit accounts offset by lower income from insurance
activities and a reduction in income from vehicle rental
activities. During the first three quarters of 2009, income from
rental activities decreased by $0.5 million due to a lower
volume of business. A further reduction of $0.4 million was
observed in the fourth quarter of 2009, as compared to the
comparable period in 2008, mainly related to the disposition of
the Corporations vehicle rental business early in the
quarter, which was partially offset by a $0.2 million gain
recorded for the disposition of the business.
2008
compared to 2007
Non-interest income increased 11% to $74.6 million for 2008
from $67.2 million for 2007. The increase was related to a
realized gain of $17.7 million on the sale of approximately
$526 million of U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS
and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the
Corporations investment in VISA in connection with
VISAs IPO. The announcement of the FED that it will invest
up to $600 billion in obligations from
U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including
$500 billion in MBS backed by FNMA, FHLMC and GNMA, caused
a surge in prices and sent mortgage rates down and offered a
market opportunity to realize a gain. Higher point of sale (POS)
and ATM interchange fee income and an increase in fee income
from cash management services provided to corporate customers
accounted for approximately $3.9 million of the increase in
non-interest income. OTTI charges amounted to $6.0 million
in 2008, compared to $5.9 million in 2007. Different from
2007 when impairment charges related exclusively to equity
securities, most of the impairment charges in 2008
(approximately $4.2 million) was related to auto industry
corporate bonds held by FirstBank Florida. The
Corporations remaining exposure to auto industry corporate
bonds as of December 31, 2008 amounted to
$1.5 million, while its exposure to equity securities was
approximately $2.2 million. These auto industry corporate
bonds were sold in 2009 and a gain of $0.9 million was
recorded at the time of sale, while the exposure to equity
securities was reduced to $1.8 million as of
December 31, 2009 after OTTI charges of $0.4 million
recorded in 2009
77
The increase in non-interest income attributable to activities
mentioned above was partially offset, when comparing 2008 to
2007, by isolated events such as the $15.1 million income
recognition in 2007 for reimbursement of expenses related to the
class action lawsuit settled in 2007, and a gain of
$2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and of
$2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and
recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local
financial institution that were recognized in 2007.
Non-Interest
Expense
The following table presents the components of non-interest
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
132,734
|
|
|
$
|
141,853
|
|
|
$
|
140,363
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
62,335
|
|
|
|
61,818
|
|
|
|
58,894
|
|
Deposit insurance premium
|
|
|
40,582
|
|
|
|
10,111
|
|
|
|
6,687
|
|
Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees
|
|
|
20,870
|
|
|
|
22,868
|
|
|
|
21,293
|
|
Professional fees recurring
|
|
|
12,980
|
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
|
|
13,480
|
|
Professional fees non-recurring
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
3,237
|
|
|
|
7,271
|
|
Servicing and processing fees
|
|
|
10,174
|
|
|
|
9,918
|
|
|
|
6,574
|
|
Business promotion
|
|
|
14,158
|
|
|
|
17,565
|
|
|
|
18,029
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
8,283
|
|
|
|
8,856
|
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
Net loss on REO operations
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
21,373
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Other
|
|
|
25,885
|
|
|
|
23,200
|
|
|
|
24,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
352,101
|
|
|
$
|
333,371
|
|
|
$
|
307,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
compared to 2008
Non-interest expenses increased $18.7 million to
$352.1 million for 2009 primarily reflecting:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $30.5 million in the FDIC deposit insurance
premium, including $8.9 million for the special assessment
levied by the FDIC in 2009 and increases in regular assessment
rates. The FDIC increased its insurance premium rates to banks
in 2009 due to losses to the FDIC insurance fund as a result of
bank failures during 2008 and 2009, coupled with additional
losses that the FDIC projected for the future due to anticipated
additional bank failures.
|
|
|
|
A $4.0 million impairment of the core deposit intangible of
FirstBank Florida, recorded in 2009 as part of other
non-interest expenses. The core deposit intangible represents
the value of the premium paid to acquire core deposits of an
institution. Core deposit intangible impairment occurs when the
present value of expected future earnings attributed to
maintaining the core deposit base diminishes. Factors which
contributed to the impairment include deposit run-off and a
shift of customers to time certificates.
|
|
|
|
A $1.8 million increase in the reserve for probable losses
on outstanding unfunded loan commitments recorded as part of
other non-interest expenses. The reserve for unfunded loan
commitments is an estimate of the losses inherent in off-balance
sheet loan commitments at the balance sheet date, and it was
mainly related to outstanding construction loans commitments. It
is calculated by multiplying an estimated loss factor by an
estimated probability of funding, and then by the period-end
amounts for unfunded commitments. The reserve for unfunded loan
commitments is included as part of accounts payable and other
liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.
|
The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases
in certain controllable expenses such as:
|
|
|
|
|
A $9.1 million decrease in employees compensation and
benefit expenses, mainly due to a lower headcount and reductions
in bonuses, incentive compensation and overtime costs. The
number of full time equivalent employees decreased by 163, or
6%, during 2009.
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
A $3.4 million decrease in business promotion expenses due
to a lower level of marketing activities.
|
|
|
|
A $1.1 million decrease in taxes, other than income taxes,
mainly driven by a decrease in municipal taxes which are
assessed based on taxable gross revenues.
|
The Corporation continued to reduce costs through corporate-wide
efforts to focus on its core business, including cost-cutting
initiatives. The efficiency ratio for 2009 was 53.24% compared
to 55.33% for 2008.
2008
compared to 2007
Non-interest expenses increased 8% to $333.4 million for
2008 from $307.8 million for 2007. The increase was
principally attributable to a higher net loss on REO operations
and increases in the deposit insurance premium expense and
occupancy and equipment expenses, partially offset by lower
professional fees.
The net loss on REO operations increased by approximately
$19.0 million for 2008, as compared to the previous year,
mainly due to a higher inventory of repossessed properties and
declining real estate prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland,
that have caused write-downs of the value of repossessed
properties. A significant portion of the losses was related to
foreclosed properties in Florida, including a $5.3 million
write-down to the value of a single foreclosed project in the
United States as of December 31, 2008. Higher losses were
also observed in Puerto Rico due to a higher inventory and
recent trends in sales.
The deposit insurance premium expense increased by
$3.4 million as the Corporation used available one-time
credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a
new assessment system adopted by the FDIC and also attributable
to the increase in the deposit base.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased by $2.9 million
primarily to support the growth of the Corporations
operations as well as increases in utility costs.
Employeescompensation and benefit expenses increased by
$1.5 million for 2008, as compared to the previous year,
primarily due to higher average compensation and related fringe
benefits, partially offset by a decrease of $2.8 million in
stock-based compensation expenses and the impact in 2007 of the
accrual of approximately $3.3 million for a voluntary
separation program established by the Corporation as part of its
cost saving strategies. The Corporation has been able to
continue the growth of its operations without incurring
substantial additional operating expenses. The
Corporations total headcount decreased as compared to
December 31, 2007 as a result of the voluntary separation
program completed earlier in 2008 and reductions by attrition.
These decreases have been partially offset by increases due to
the acquisition of the Virgin Islands Community Bank
(VICB) in the first quarter of 2008 and to
reinforcement of audit and credit risk management personnel.
Professional fees decreased by $4.9 million for the
2008 year, as compared to 2007, primarily attributable to
lower legal, accounting and consulting fees due to, among other
things, the settlement of legal and regulatory matters.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state
taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on
its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First
BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income
tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income
tax only on its income from sources within the United States or
income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business within the United States. Any such tax paid is
creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against
the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability. The
Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on
its income from sources within that jurisdiction. Any such tax
paid is creditable against the Corporations Puerto Rico
tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended
(PR Code), First BanCorp is subject to a maximum
statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009 the Puerto Rico Government
approved Act No. 7
79
(the Act), to stimulate Puerto Ricos economy
and to reduce the Puerto Rico Governments fiscal deficit.
The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures,
including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income
tax determined, which is applicable to corporations, among
others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively
resulting in an increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from
39% to 40.95% and an increase in capital gain statutory tax rate
from 15% to 15.75%. This temporary measure is effective for tax
years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before
January 1, 2012. The PR Code also includes an alternative
minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporations
regular income tax liability is less than the alternative
minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than
the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government
obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from
U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business
through IBEs of the Corporation and the Bank and through the
Banks subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which
the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico
and U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are
subject to a special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise
subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure
is also effective for tax years that commenced after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs
and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the
International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides
for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by
IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a
bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the
IBEs net income exceeds 20% of the banks total net
taxable income.
For additional information relating to income taxes, see
Note 27 to the Corporations financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K,
including the reconciliation of the statutory to the effective
income tax rate for 2009, 2008 and 2007.
2009
compared to 2008
For 2009, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of
$4.5 million, compared to an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million for 2008. The fluctuation in income tax
expense for 2009 mainly resulted from non-cash charges of
approximately $184.4 million to increase the valuation
allowance for the Corporations deferred tax asset. As of
December 31, 2009, the deferred tax asset, net of a
valuation allowance of $191.7 million, amounted to
$109.2 million compared to $128.0 million as of
December 31, 2008.
Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess
whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their
deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not realization
standard. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary,
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant
weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively
verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The
accounting for income taxes guidance requires the consideration
of all sources of taxable income available to realize the
deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing
temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In
estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and
risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking
into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and
recognized tax benefits only when deemed probable.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a
significant negative factor that resulted in the increase of the
valuation allowance was that the Corporations banking
subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico was in a three-year historical
cumulative loss as of the end of the year 2009, mainly as a
result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses,
especially in the construction portfolio both in Puerto Rico and
the United States, resulting from the economic downturn. As
of December 31, 2009, management concluded that
$109.2 million of the deferred tax assets will be realized.
In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax
assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable
income mentioned above and even though sufficient profits are
expected in the next seven years to realized the deferred tax
asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Company
has only relied on tax-planning strategies as the main source of
taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset amount. Among
the most significant tax-planning strategies identified
80
are: (i) sale of appreciated assets,
(ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable companies
(in Puerto Rico each Company files a separate tax return; no
consolidated tax returns are permitted), and (iii) deferral
of deductions without affecting its utilization. Management will
continue monitoring the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax
assets in future periods. If future events differ from
managements December 31, 2009 assessment, an
additional valuation allowance may need to be established which
may have a material adverse effect on the Corporations
results of operations. Similarly, to the extent the realization
of a portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes more likely
than not based on changes in circumstances (such as,
improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant
changes), a reversal of that portion of the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance will then be recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact
on the Corporations liquidity, nor does such an allowance
preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits or
other deferred tax assets in the future.
Partially offsetting the impact of the increase in the valuation
allowance, was the reversal of approximately $19 million of
Unrecognized Tax Benefits (UTBs) as further
discussed below. The income tax provision in 2009 was also
impacted by adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result of
the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. The
effect of a higher temporary statutory tax rate over the normal
statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax benefit
of $10.4 million for 2009 that was partially offset by an
income tax provision of $6.6 million related to the special
5% tax on the operations of FirstBank Overseas Corporation.
Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the
change in the income tax rate considering the enacted tax rate
expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the
deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or
realized.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs
by $10.8 million and related accrued interest of
$5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations
for the 2004 taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation
entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of the
Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all
possible income and withholding tax deficiencies related to
taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of such
agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of
2009 the remaining UTBs and related interest by approximately
$2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of
the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of
December 31, 2009. Refer to Note 27 to the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for additional information.
2008
compared to 2007
For 2008, the Corporation recognized an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million compared to an income tax expense of
$21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation was mainly related
to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was
derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through
the IBE, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. Also, the positive
fluctuation in financial results was impacted by two
transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of UTBs
during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income
tax returns, as explained below, and (ii) the recognition
of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with
an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of
Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that established a
multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the
$74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007
to settle a securities class action suit. Also, higher deferred
tax benefits were recorded in connection with a higher provision
for loan and lease losses.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation reversed UTBs
of approximately $7.1 million and accrued interest of
$3.5 million as a result of a lapse of the applicable
statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year.
81
OPERATING
SEGMENTS
Based upon the Corporations organizational structure and
the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the
operating segments are driven primarily by the
Corporations lines of business for its operations in
Puerto Rico, the Corporations principal market, and by
geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As
of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had six reportable
segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking;
Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United
States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management
determined the reportable segments based on the internal
reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to
allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporations
organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution
channels and the economic characteristics of the products were
also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
For information regarding First BanCorps reportable
segments, please refer to Note 33 Segment
Information to the Corporations financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation has
realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views
and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were
created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation
outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United
States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated
as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment
reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring
initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida
operations with and into FirstBank, and will allow the
Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus.
Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were
driven primarily by the Corporations legal entities.
FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through
its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in
the Corporations then four reportable segments (Commercial
and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail)
Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations
conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a
category named Other. In the third quarter of 2009,
as a result of the aforementioned merger, the operations of
FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable
segments. The change in the fourth quarter reflected a further
realignment of the organizational structure as a result of
management changes. Prior period amounts have been reclassified
to conform to current period presentation. These changes did not
have an impact on the previously reported consolidated results
of the Corporation.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in Note 1 Nature of Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based
on net interest income, the estimated provision for loan and
lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest
expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average
volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for
loan and lease losses.
The Treasury and Investment segment lends funds to the Consumer
(Retail) Banking, Mortgage Banking and Commercial and Corporate
Banking segments to finance their lending activities and borrows
funds from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment
also lends funds to other segments. The interest rates charged
or credited by Treasury and Investment and the Consumer (Retail)
Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The
difference between the allocated interest income or expense and
the Corporations actual net interest income from
centralized management of funding costs is reported in the
Treasury and Investments segment.
Consumer(Retail)Banking
The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment mainly consists of the
Corporations consumer lending and deposit-taking
activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan
centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boat,
lines of credit, personal loans and finance leases. Deposit
products include interest bearing and non-interest bearing
checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts
(IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail deposits
gathered through each branch of FirstBanks retail network
serve as one of the funding sources for the lending and
investment activities.
82
Consumer lending has been mainly driven by auto loan
originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of seeking to
provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers that
provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporations auto
loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to our
commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains
strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the
foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The
Corporations commercial relations with floor plan dealers
are strong and directly benefit the Corporations consumer
lending operation and are managed as part of the consumer
banking activities.
Personal loans and, to a lesser extent, marine financing and a
small revolving credit portfolio also contribute to interest
income generated on consumer lending. Credit card accounts are
issued under the Banks name through an alliance with FIA
Card Services (Bank of America), which bears the credit risk.
Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loans
market, applying the Corporations strict underwriting
standards. Other activities included in this segment are finance
leases and insurance activities in Puerto Rico.
The highlights of the Consumer (Retail) Banking segment
financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31,
2009 was $20.9 million compared to $21.8 million and
$37.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $149.6 million compared to $166.0 million and
$174.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The decrease in net interest income
reflects a diminished consumer loan portfolio due to principal
repayments and charge-offs relating to the auto and personal
loans portfolio (including finance leases). This portfolio is
mainly composed of fixed-rate loans financed with shorter-term
borrowings thus positively affected in a declining interest rate
scenario; however, this was more than offset by a decrease in
the amount credited to this segment for its deposit-taking
activities due to the decline in interest rates and the lower
volume of loans, resulting in a decrease in net interest income
in 2009 as compared to 2008 and in 2008 as compared to 2007.
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 decreased by
$18.0 million compared to the same period in 2008 and
increased by $6.7 million when comparing 2008 with the same
period in 2007. The decrease in the provision was mainly related
to the lower amount of the consumer loan portfolio, a relative
stability in delinquency and non-performing levels, and a
decrease in net charge-offs attributable in part to the changes
in underwriting standards implemented since late 2005 and the
originations using these new underwriting standards of new
consumer loans to replace maturing consumer loans that had an
average life of approximately four years. The increase in 2008,
compared to 2007, was due to adjustments to loss factors based
on economic indicators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $32.0 million compared to $35.6 million and
$32.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The decrease for 2009, as compared to
2008, was mainly related to lower insurance income and a
reduction in income from vehicle rental activities partially
offset by higher service charges on deposit accounts and higher
ATM interchange fee income. As part of the Corporations
strategies to focus on its core business, the Corporation
divested its short-term rental business during the fourth
quarter of 2009. The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was
mainly related to higher point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange
fee income caused by a change in the calculation of interchange
fees charged between financial institutions in Puerto Rico from
a fixed fee calculation to a percentage of the sale calculation
since the second half of 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2009 were $98.3 million compared to
$99.2 million and $95.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in
direct non-interest expenses for 2009, as compared to 2008, was
primarily due to reductions in marketing and occupancy expenses,
mainly electricity costs, partially offset by the increase in
the FDIC insurance premium associated with increases in the
regular assessment rates and the special fee levied in 2009. The
increase in direct non-interest expenses for 2008, compared to
2007, was mainly due to increases in compensation, marketing
collection efforts and the FDIC insurance premium.
|
83
Commercial
and Corporate Banking
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the
Corporations lending and other services for the public
sector and specialized industries such as healthcare, tourism,
financial institutions, food and beverage, shopping centers and
middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real
estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash
management and business management services. A substantial
portion of this portfolio is secured by the underlying value of
the real estate collateral, and collateral and the personal
guarantees of the borrowers are taken in abundance of caution.
Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a
typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in
size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the
Corporation has and maintains a credit risk management
infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated
with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan
review functions, sales of loan participations and continuous
monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
For this segment, the Corporation follows a strategy aimed to
cater to customer needs in the commercial loans middle market
segment by seeking to build strong relationships and offering
financial solutions that meet customers unique needs.
Starting in 2005, the Corporation expanded its distribution
network and participation in the commercial loans middle market
segment by focusing on customers with financing needs of up to
$5 million. The Corporation established 5 regional offices
that provide coverage throughout Puerto Rico. The offices are
staffed with sales, marketing and credit officers able to
provide a high level of personalized service and prompt
decision-making.
The highlights of the Commercial and Corporate Banking segment
financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss before taxes for the year ended December 31,
2009 was $129.8 million compared to income of
$56.9 million and $78.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $180.3 million compared to $112.3 million and
$104.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in net interest income for
2009 and 2008, was related to both an increase in the average
volume of earning assets driven by new commercial loan
originations and lower interest rates charged by other business
segments due to the decline in short-term interest rates that
more than offset lower loan yields due to the significant
increase in non-accrual loans and to the repricing at lower
rates. However, the Corporation is actively increasing spreads
on variable-rate commercial loan renewals given the current
market environment. During 2009, the Corporation increased the
use of interest rate floors in new commercial and construction
loan agreements and renewals to protect net interest margins
going forward. The increase in volume of earning assets was
primarily due to credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico
Government and its political subdivisions. As of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.2 billion
outstanding of credit facilities granted to the Puerto Rico
Government and its political subdivisions.
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses for 2009 was $273.8 million
compared to $35.5 million and $12.5 million for 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan
and lease losses for 2009 was mainly driven by the continuing
pressures of a weak Puerto Rico economy and a stagnant housing
market that were the main reasons for the increase in
non-accrual loans, the migration of loans to higher risk
categories (including a significant increase in impaired loans)
and the increase in charge-offs. These have resulted in higher
specific reserves for impaired loans and increases in loss
factors used for the determination of the general reserve. Refer
to the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
discussion above and to the Risk Management
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing
Assets discussion below for additional information with
respect to the credit quality of the Corporations
commercial and construction loan portfolio. The increase in the
provision for loan and lease losses for 2008 was mainly driven
by the increase in the amount of commercial and construction
impaired loans in Puerto Rico due to deteriorating economic
conditions.
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31,
2009 amounted to $5.7 million compared to a non-interest
income of $4.6 million and $6.2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in non-interest income for 2009, as compared to 2008,
was mainly attributable to higher non-deferrable loans fees such
as agent, commitment and drawing fees from commercial customers.
Also, an increase in cash management fees from corporate
customers contributed to the increase in non-interest income.
The increase in non-interest income for 2008 was mainly
attributable to the $2.5 million gain resulting from an
agreement entered into with another local financial institution
for the partial extinguishment of secured commercial loans
extended to such institution. Aside from this transaction,
non-interest income for the Commercial and Corporate Banking
Segment increased by $0.9 million in connection with higher
fees on cash management services provided to corporate customers.
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses for 2009 were $41.9 million
compared to $24.5 million and $20.1 million for 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to
2008, was primarily due to the portion of the increase in the
FDIC deposit insurance premium allocated to this segment; this
was partially offset by reductions in compensation expense. The
increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was also mainly due to
the portion of the increase in the FDIC insurance premium as
increase in compensation and a higher loss in REO operations,
primarily due to the increase in the volume of repossessed
properties and writedowns.
|
Mortgage
Banking
The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly
through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary,
FirstMortgage. These operations consist of the origination, sale
and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans
products. Originations are sourced through different channels
such as branches, mortgage bankers and real estate brokers, and
in association with new project developers. FirstMortgage
focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of
which conform to Federal Housing Administration
(FHA), Veterans Administration (VA) and
Rural Development (RD) standards. Loans originated
that meet FHA standards qualify for the federal agencys
insurance program whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards
are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. Mortgage
loans that do not qualify under these programs are commonly
referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real estate
loans could be conforming and non-conforming. Conforming loans
are residential real estate loans that meet the standards for
sale under the FNMA and FHLMC programs whereas loans that do not
meet the standards are referred to as non-conforming residential
real estate loans. The Corporations strategy is to
penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high
quality mortgage products to serve their financial needs faster
and simpler and at competitive prices.
The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages
in the secondary markets. Residential real estate conforming
loans are sold to investors like FNMA and FHLMC. In December
2008, the Corporation obtained from GNMA, Commitment Authority
to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this program, in
2009, the Corporation securitized and sold FHA/VA mortgage loan
production into the secondary markets.
The highlights of the Mortgage Banking segment financial results
for the year ended December 31, 2009 include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss before taxes for the year ended December 31,
2009 was $14.3 million compared to income of
$8.3 million and $7.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $39.2 million compared to $37.3 million and
$27.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in net interest income for
2009 and 2008 was mainly related to the decline in short-term
rates. This portfolio is principally composed of fixed-rate
residential mortgage loans tied to long-term interest rates that
are financed with shorter-term borrowings, thus positively
affected in a declining interest rate scenario as the one
prevailing in 2009 and 2008. The increase was also related to a
higher portfolio, driven in 2009 by the purchase of
approximately $205 million of residential mortgages that
previously served as
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
collateral for a commercial loan extended to
R&G Financial, a Puerto Rican financial institution.
The increase in the portfolio in 2008 was driven by mortgage
loan originations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan and lease losses for the year 2009 was
$29.7 million compared to $9.0 million and
$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase in 2009 and 2008 was mainly
related to the increase in the volume of non-performing loans
due to deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico and an
increase in reserve factors to account for the continued
recessionary economic conditions and negative loss trends.
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $8.5 million compared to $2.7 million and
$2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008
was driven by approximately $4.6 million of capitalized
servicing assets in connection with the securitization of
approximately $305 million FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA
MBS. For the first time in several years, the Corporation was
engaged in the securitization of mortgage loans throughout 2009.
The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was driven by a
higher volume of loan sales in the secondary market.
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses for 2009 were $32.3 million
compared to $22.7 million and $20.9 million for 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to
2008, was also mainly related to the portion of the FDIC deposit
insurance premium allocated to this segment, a higher loss on
REO operations associated with a higher volume of repossessed
properties and an increase in professional service fees. The
increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, is related to technology
related expenses incurred to improve the servicing of the
mortgage loans as well as increases in compensation and, to a
lesser extent, higher losses on REO operations in connection
with a higher volume of repossessed properties and trends in
sales.
|
Treasury
and Investments
The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the
Corporations treasury and investment management functions.
In the treasury function, which includes funding and liquidity
management, this segment sells funds to the Commercial and
Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer (Retail)
Banking segments to finance their lending activities and
purchases funds gathered by those segments. Funds not gathered
by the different business units are obtained by the Treasury
Division through wholesale channels, such as brokered deposits,
Advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with investment
securities, among others.
Since the Corporation is a net borrower of funds, the securities
portfolio does not result from the investment of excess funds.
The securities portfolio is a leverage strategy for the purposes
of liquidity management, interest rate management and earnings
enhancement.
The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and
Investments are based on market rates.
The highlights of the Treasury and Investments segment financial
results for the year ended December 31, 2009 include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31,
2009 amounted to $163.1 million compared to
$142.3 million for 2008 and of $36.5 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $86.1 million compared to $123.4 million and
$46.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The decrease in 2009, as compared to
2008, was mainly due to the decrease in the amount credited to
this segment for its deposit-taking activities due to the
decline in interest rates and due to lower yields on investment
securities. This was partially offset by reductions in the cost
of funding as maturing brokered CDs were replaced with
shorter-term CDs at lower prevailing rates and very low-cost
sources of funding such as advances from the FED and a higher
average volume of investments. Funds obtained through short-term
borrowings were invested, in part, in the purchase of investment
securities to mitigate the decline in the average yield on
securities that resulted from the acceleration of MBS
prepayments and calls of
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agency debentures (refer to the Financial and
Operating Data Analysis Investment Activities
discussion below for additional information about investment
purchases, sales and calls in 2009). The decrease in the yield
of investments was driven by the approximately $945 million
of U.S. agency debentures called in 2009 and MBS
prepayments. The variance observed in 2008, as compared to 2007,
is mainly related to lower short-term rates and, to a lesser
extent, to an increase in the volume of average interest-earning
assets. The Corporations securities portfolio is mainly
composed of fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS and debt securities
tied to long-term rates. During 2008, the Corporation purchased
approximately $3.2 billion in fixed-rate MBS at an average
yield of 5.44%, which was significantly higher than the cost of
borrowings used to finance the purchase of such assets. Despite
the early redemption by counterparties of approximately
$1.2 billion of U.S. agency debentures through call
exercises, the lack of liquidity in the financial markets caused
several call dates go by in 2008 without issuers actions to
exercise call provisions embedded in approximately
$945 million of U.S. agency debentures still held by
the Corporation as of December 31, 2008. The Corporation
benefited from higher than current market yields on these
instruments. Also, non-cash gains from changes in the fair value
of derivative instruments and liabilities measured at fair value
accounted for approximately $14.2 million of the increase
in net interest income for 2008 as compared to 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
amounted to $84.4 million compared to income of
$25.6 million and losses of $2.2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in 2009, as compared to 2008, was driven by a
$59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of
investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million
gain on the sale of MBS (mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate
MBS), compared to realized gains on the sale of MBS of
$17.7 million in 2008. The positive fluctuation in
non-interest income for 2008, as compared to 2007, was related
to a realized gain of $17.7 million mainly on the sale of
approximately $526 million of U.S. sponsored agency
fixed-rate MBS and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale
of part of the Corporations investment in VISA in
connection with VISAs IPO. Refer to Non-interest
income discussion above for additional information.
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses for 2009 were $7.4 million
compared to $6.7 million and $7.8 million for 2008 and
2007, respectively. The fluctuations are mainly associated to
professional service fees.
|
United
States Operations
The United States operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland.
The Corporation provides a wide range of banking services to
individual and corporate customers in the state of Florida
through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers. In
the United States, the Corporation originally had an agency
lending office in Miami, Florida. Then, it acquired Coral
Gables-based Ponce General (the parent company of Unibank, a
savings and loans bank in 2005) and changed the savings and
loans name to FirstBank Florida. Those two entities were
operated separately. In 2009, the Corporation filed an
application with the Office of Thrift Supervision to surrender
the Miami-based FirstBank Florida charter and merge its assets
into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the main subsidiary of First
BanCorp. The Corporation placed the entire Florida operation
under the control of a new appointed Executive Vice President.
The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by
leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and
thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the
Florida market.
The highlights of the United States operations segment financial
results for the year ended December 31, 2009 include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss before taxes for the year ended December 31,
2009 was $222.3 million compared to loss of
$62.4 million and $12.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $2.6 million compared to $28.8 million and
$38.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The decrease in net interest income for
2009 and 2008 was related to the surge in non-performing assets,
mainly construction loans, and a decrease in the volume of
average earning-assets partially offset by a lower cost of
funding due to the decline in market interest rates that benefit
interest rates paid on short-term
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings. In 2009, the Corporation implemented initiatives to
accelerate deposit growth with special emphasis on increasing
core deposits and shift away from brokered deposits. Also, the
Corporation took actions to reduce its non-performing credits
including the sales of certain troubled loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses for 2009 was $188.7 million
compared to $53.4 million and $30.2 million for 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan
and lease losses for 2009 was mainly driven by the increase in
non-performing loans and the decline in collateral values that
has resulted in historical increases in charge-offs levels.
Higher delinquency levels and loss trends were accounted for the
loss factors used to determine the general reserve. Also,
additional charges were necessary because of a higher volume of
impaired loans that required specific reserves. Refer to the
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses discussion above
and to the Risk Management Allowance for Loan
and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets discussion
below for additional information with respect to the credit
quality of the loan portfolio in the United States. The increase
in the provision for loan and lease losses for 2008 was mainly
driven by higher specific reserves relating to condo-conversion
loans due to the deterioration of the real estate market and a
slumping economy.
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income for the year ended December 31,
2009 amounted to $1.5 million compared to a non-interest
loss of $3.6 million and non-interest income of
$1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest income for
2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly attributable to a gain of
$0.9 million on the sale of the entire portfolio of auto
industry corporate bonds after having taking impairment charges
of $4.2 million on those bonds in 2008. The decrease in
non-interest income for 2008 was for the aforementioned
impairment charge on corporate bonds and lower service charges
on deposit accounts and loan fees.
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses for 2009 were $37.7 million
compared to $34.2 million and $21.8 million for 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to
2008, was primarily due to the increase in the FDIC deposit
insurance premium, and professional service fees. The increase
for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly due to a higher loss
in REO operations, primarily due to write-downs and expenses
related to condo-conversion projects.
|
Virgin
Islands Operations
The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. and British
Virgin Islands, including retail and commercial banking services
as well as insurance activities. In 2002, after acquiring the
Chase Manhattan Bank operations in the Virgin Islands, FirstBank
became the largest bank in the Virgin Islands (USVI &
BVI), serving St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola and
Virgin Gorda, with 16 branches. In 2008, FirstBank acquired the
Virgin Island Community Bank (VICB) in
St. Croix, increasing its customer base and share in this
market. The Virgin Islands operations segment is driven by its
consumer and commercial lending and deposit-taking activities.
Loans to consumers include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal
loans and residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include
interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings
accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail
certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each
branch serve as the funding sources for the lending activities.
The highlights of the Virgin Islands operations segment
financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before taxes for the year ended December 31,
2009 was $0.8 million compared to $9.2 million and
$26.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $61.1 million compared to $60.0 million and
$59.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in net interest income was
primarily due to the decrease in the cost of funding due to
maturing CDs renewed at lower prevailing rates and reductions in
rates paid on interest-bearing and savings accounts due to the
decline in market interest rates. To a lesser, extent, the
increase was also due to a higher volume of commercial loans
primarily due to approximately $79.8 million in credit
facilities extended to the
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Virgin Islands Government and political subdivisions
in 2009. The increase for 2008, compared to 2007, was also
driven by a lower cost of funding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 increased by
$12.7 million compared to the same period in 2008 and
increased by $10.0 million when comparing 2008 with the
same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for 2009 was
mainly related to the construction and residential and
commercial mortgage loans portfolio affected by increases to
general reserves to account for higher delinquency levels and a
challenging economy. The increase in 2008, compared to 2007, was
driven by increases to general reserves for the residential,
commercial and commercial mortgage loans portfolio to account
for negative trends in the economy. General economic conditions
worsened, underscoring the severity of recessionary conditions
in the US economy, critically important to the U.S. Virgin
Islands as the primary market for visitors, trade and investment.
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $10.2 million compared to $9.8 million and
$12.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to
2008, was mainly related to higher service charges on deposit
accounts and higher ATM interchange fee income. The decrease for
2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly related to the impact in
2007 of a $2.8 million gain on the sale of a credit card
portfolio. Aside from this transaction, non-interest income
increased by $0.4 million primarily due to higher service
charges on deposits and higher credit and debit card interchange
fee income.
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2009 were $45.4 million compared to
$48.1 million and $42.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in
direct operating expenses for 2009, as compared to 2008, was
primarily due to a decrease in compensation expense, mainly due
to headcount, overtime and bonuses reductions. The increase in
direct operating expense for 2008, compared to 2007, was mainly
due to increases in compensation, depreciation and professional
service fees.
|
89
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Financial
Condition
The following table presents an average balance sheet of the
Corporation for the following years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
182,205
|
|
|
$
|
286,502
|
|
|
$
|
440,598
|
|
Government obligations
|
|
|
1,345,591
|
|
|
|
1,402,738
|
|
|
|
2,687,013
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,254,044
|
|
|
|
3,923,423
|
|
|
|
2,296,855
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
76,982
|
|
|
|
65,081
|
|
|
|
46,291
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
8,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
5,865,662
|
|
|
|
5,689,217
|
|
|
|
5,486,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
3,523,576
|
|
|
|
3,351,236
|
|
|
|
2,914,626
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,590,309
|
|
|
|
1,485,126
|
|
|
|
1,467,621
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
6,343,635
|
|
|
|
5,473,716
|
|
|
|
4,797,440
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
341,943
|
|
|
|
373,999
|
|
|
|
379,510
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,661,099
|
|
|
|
1,709,512
|
|
|
|
1,729,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
13,460,562
|
|
|
|
12,393,589
|
|
|
|
11,288,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
19,326,224
|
|
|
|
18,082,806
|
|
|
|
16,775,346
|
|
Total non-interest-earning assets(1)
|
|
|
480,998
|
|
|
|
425,150
|
|
|
|
438,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
19,807,222
|
|
|
$
|
18,507,956
|
|
|
$
|
17,214,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts
|
|
$
|
866,464
|
|
|
$
|
580,572
|
|
|
$
|
443,420
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
1,540,473
|
|
|
|
1,217,730
|
|
|
|
1,020,399
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,680,325
|
|
|
|
1,812,957
|
|
|
|
1,652,430
|
|
Brokered CDs
|
|
|
7,300,696
|
|
|
|
7,671,094
|
|
|
|
7,639,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
11,387,958
|
|
|
|
11,282,353
|
|
|
|
10,755,719
|
|
Loans payable(2)
|
|
|
643,618
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
3,745,980
|
|
|
|
3,864,189
|
|
|
|
3,449,492
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
1,322,136
|
|
|
|
1,120,782
|
|
|
|
723,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
17,099,692
|
|
|
|
16,278,116
|
|
|
|
14,928,807
|
|
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities(3)
|
|
|
852,943
|
|
|
|
796,476
|
|
|
|
959,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,952,635
|
|
|
|
17,074,592
|
|
|
|
15,888,168
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
909,274
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
945,313
|
|
|
|
883,264
|
|
|
|
775,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,854,587
|
|
|
|
1,433,364
|
|
|
|
1,326,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
19,807,222
|
|
|
$
|
18,507,956
|
|
|
$
|
17,214,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the allowance for loan and lease losses and the
valuation on investment securities available-for-sale. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window
Program. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes changes in fair value of liabilities elected to be
measured at fair value . |
90
The Corporations total average assets were
$19.8 billion and $18.5 billion as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase for
2009 of $1.3 billion or 7% as compared to 2008. The
increase in average assets was due to: (i) an increase of
$1.1 billion in average loans driven by new originations,
in particular credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico
Government and its political subdivisions, and (ii) an
increase of $176.4 million in investment securities mainly
due to the purchase of approximately $2.8 billion in
investment securities in 2009 (mainly U.S. agency callable
debt securities and U.S. agency MBS) and the securitization
of approximately $305 million FHA/VA loans into GNMA MBS,
partially offset by $1.9 billion in investment securities
sold during the year (mainly U.S. agency MBS, including
$452 million in the last month of the year) and
$955 million debt securities called during the year (mainly
U.S. agency debentures). The increase in average assets for
2008, as compared to 2007, was also driven by an increase of
$1.1 billion in average loans due to loan originations,
mainly commercial and residential mortgage loans, and an
increase of $202.6 million in investment securities, mainly
due to purchases of U.S. agency MBS.
The Corporations total average liabilities were
$18.0 billion and $17.1 billion as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase of
$878.0 million or 5% as compared to 2008. The Corporation
has diversified its sources of borrowings including: (i) an
increase of $834.2 million in the average balance of
advances from the FED and the FHLB, as the Corporation used
low-cost sources of funding to match an investment portfolio
with a shorter maturity, and (ii) an increase of
$105.6 million in average interest-bearing deposits,
reflecting increases in core deposits, mainly in money market
accounts in Florida. The Corporations total average
liabilities were $17.1 billion and $15.9 billion as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, an increase of
$1.2 billion or 7% as compared to 2007. The Corporation
diversified its sources of borrowings including: (i) an
increase of $526.6 million in average interest-bearing
deposits, reflecting increases in brokered CDs used to finance
lending activities and to increase liquidity levels as a
precautionary measure given the volatile economic climate, and
increases in deposits from individual, commercial and government
sectors, (ii) an increase of $414.7 million in
alternative sources such as repurchase agreements that financed
the increase in investment securities, and (iii) a combined
increase of approximately $408.0 million in advances from
FHLB and short-term borrowings from the FED through the Discount
Window Program as the Corporation took direct actions to enhance
its liquidity position due to the financial market disruptions
and to increase its borrowing capacity with the FHLB and the
FED, which funds are also used to finance the Corporations
lending activities.
Assets
Total assets as of December 31, 2009 amounted to
$19.6 billion, an increase of $137.2 million compared
to $19.5 billion as of December 31, 2008. The
Corporations loan portfolio increased by
$860.9 million (before the allowance for loan and lease
losses), driven by new originations, mainly credit facilities
extended to the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. Also, an increase of $298.4 million
in cash and cash equivalents contributed to the increase in
total assets, as the Corporation improved its liquidity position
as a precautionary measure given current volatile market
conditions. Partially offsetting the increase in loans and
liquid assets was a $790.8 million decrease in investment
securities, driven by sales and principal repayments of MBS as
well as U.S. agency debt securities called during 2009.
91
Loans
Receivable
The following table presents the composition of the loan
portfolio including loans held for sale as of year-end for each
of the last five years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans, including loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
3,616,283
|
|
|
$
|
3,491,728
|
|
|
$
|
3,164,421
|
|
|
$
|
2,772,630
|
|
|
$
|
2,346,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,590,821
|
|
|
|
1,535,758
|
|
|
|
1,279,251
|
|
|
|
1,215,040
|
|
|
|
1,090,193
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
|
|
1,526,995
|
|
|
|
1,454,644
|
|
|
|
1,511,608
|
|
|
|
1,137,118
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans
|
|
|
5,029,907
|
|
|
|
3,857,728
|
|
|
|
3,231,126
|
|
|
|
2,698,141
|
|
|
|
2,421,219
|
|
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real
estate mortgages and pass-through trust certificates
|
|
|
321,522
|
|
|
|
567,720
|
|
|
|
624,597
|
|
|
|
932,013
|
|
|
|
3,676,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
|
|
8,434,839
|
|
|
|
7,488,201
|
|
|
|
6,589,618
|
|
|
|
6,356,802
|
|
|
|
8,324,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
|
|
363,883
|
|
|
|
378,556
|
|
|
|
361,631
|
|
|
|
280,571
|
|
Consumer loans and other loans
|
|
|
1,579,600
|
|
|
|
1,744,480
|
|
|
|
1,667,151
|
|
|
|
1,772,917
|
|
|
|
1,733,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
|
13,088,292
|
|
|
|
11,799,746
|
|
|
|
11,263,980
|
|
|
|
12,685,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(528,120
|
)
|
|
|
(281,526
|
)
|
|
|
(190,168
|
)
|
|
|
(158,296
|
)
|
|
|
(147,999
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
$
|
12,806,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,609,578
|
|
|
$
|
11,105,684
|
|
|
$
|
12,537,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending
Activities
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations total loans
increased by $860.9 million, when compared with the balance
as of December 31, 2008. The increase in the
Corporations total loans primarily relates to increases in
C&I loans driven by internal loan originations, mainly to
the Puerto Rico Government as further discussed below, partially
offset by repayments and charge-offs of approximately
$333.3 million recorded in 2009, mainly for construction
loans in Florida.
As shown in the table above, the 2009 loan portfolio was
comprised of commercial (60%), residential real estate (26%),
and consumer and finance leases (14%). Of the total gross loan
portfolio of $13.9 billion as of December 31, 2009,
approximately 83% have credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico,
9% in the United States and 8% in the Virgin Islands, as
shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto
|
|
|
Virgin
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
Rico
|
|
|
Islands
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans, including loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
2,790,829
|
|
|
$
|
450,649
|
|
|
$
|
374,805
|
|
|
$
|
3,616,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
983,125
|
|
|
|
73,114
|
|
|
|
534,582
|
|
|
|
1,590,821
|
|
Construction loans(1)
|
|
|
998,235
|
|
|
|
194,813
|
|
|
|
299,541
|
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans
|
|
|
4,756,297
|
|
|
|
241,497
|
|
|
|
32,113
|
|
|
|
5,029,907
|
|
Loans to a local financial institution collateralized by real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
321,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
|
|
7,059,179
|
|
|
|
509,424
|
|
|
|
866,236
|
|
|
|
8,434,839
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,446,354
|
|
|
|
98,418
|
|
|
|
34,828
|
|
|
|
1,579,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
$
|
11,614,866
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,491
|
|
|
$
|
1,275,869
|
|
|
$
|
13,949,226
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(410,714
|
)
|
|
|
(27,502
|
)
|
|
|
(89,904
|
)
|
|
|
(528,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,204,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,030,989
|
|
|
$
|
1,185,965
|
|
|
$
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Construction loans of Florida operations include approximately
$70.4 million of condo-conversion loans, net of charge-offs
of $32.4 million. |
92
First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches
to originate residential and consumer loans. The Corporation
supplements its residential mortgage originations with wholesale
servicing released mortgage loan purchases from mortgage
bankers. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial
loan originations through centralized units and most of its
originations come from existing customers as well as through
referrals and direct solicitations. For purpose of the following
presentation, the Corporation separately presented secured
commercial loans to local financial institutions because it
believes this approach provides a better representation of the
Corporations commercial production capacity.
The following table sets forth certain additional data
(including loan production) related to the Corporations
loan portfolio net of the allowance for loan and lease losses
for the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
12,806,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,609,578
|
|
|
$
|
11,105,684
|
|
|
$
|
12,537,930
|
|
|
$
|
9,556,958
|
|
Residential real estate loans originated and purchased
|
|
|
591,889
|
|
|
|
690,365
|
|
|
|
715,203
|
|
|
|
908,846
|
|
|
|
1,372,490
|
|
Construction loans originated and purchased
|
|
|
433,493
|
|
|
|
475,834
|
|
|
|
678,004
|
|
|
|
961,746
|
|
|
|
1,061,773
|
|
C&I and Commercial mortgage loans originated and purchased
|
|
|
3,153,278
|
|
|
|
2,175,395
|
|
|
|
1,898,157
|
|
|
|
2,031,629
|
|
|
|
2,258,558
|
|
Secured commercial loans disbursed to local financial
institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681,407
|
|
Finance leases originated
|
|
|
80,716
|
|
|
|
110,596
|
|
|
|
139,599
|
|
|
|
177,390
|
|
|
|
145,808
|
|
Consumer loans originated and purchased
|
|
|
514,774
|
|
|
|
788,215
|
|
|
|
653,180
|
|
|
|
807,979
|
|
|
|
992,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated and purchased
|
|
|
4,774,150
|
|
|
|
4,240,405
|
|
|
|
4,084,143
|
|
|
|
4,887,590
|
|
|
|
6,512,978
|
|
Sales and securitizations of loans
|
|
|
(464,705
|
)
|
|
|
(164,583
|
)
|
|
|
(147,044
|
)
|
|
|
(167,381
|
)
|
|
|
(118,527
|
)
|
Repayments and prepayments
|
|
|
(3,010,857
|
)
|
|
|
(2,589,120
|
)
|
|
|
(3,084,530
|
)
|
|
|
(6,022,633
|
)
|
|
|
(3,803,804
|
)
|
Other (decreases) increases(1)(2)
|
|
|
(684,248
|
)
|
|
|
(289,514
|
)
|
|
|
(348,675
|
)
|
|
|
(129,822
|
)
|
|
|
390,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
|
|
|
614,340
|
|
|
|
1,197,188
|
|
|
|
503,894
|
|
|
|
(1,432,246
|
)
|
|
|
2,980,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
$
|
12,806,766
|
|
|
$
|
11,609,578
|
|
|
$
|
11,105,684
|
|
|
$
|
12,537,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage increase (decrease)
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
10.31
|
%
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
|
|
(11.42
|
)%
|
|
|
31.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the change in the allowance for loan and lease losses
and cancellation of loans due to the repossession of the
collateral. |
|
(2) |
|
For 2008, is net of $19.6 million of loans from the
acquisition of VICB. For 2007, includes the recharacterization
of securities collateralized by loans of approximately
$183.8 million previously accounted for as a secured
commercial loan with R&G Financial. For 2005, includes
$470 million of loans acquired as part of the Ponce General
acquisition. |
Residential
Real Estate Loans
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations residential
real estate loan portfolio increased by $124.6 million as
compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008. More than
90% of the Corporations outstanding balance of residential
mortgage loans consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full
documentation loans. In accordance with the Corporations
underwriting guidelines, residential real estate loans are
mostly full documented loans,
93
and the Corporation is not actively involved in the origination
of negative amortization loans or adjustable-rate mortgage
loans. The increase was driven by a portfolio acquired during
the second quarter of 2009 from R&G, a Puerto Rican
financial institution, and new loan originations during 2009.
The R&G transaction involved the purchase of
approximately $205 million of residential mortgage loans
that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan
extended to R&G. The purchase price of the transaction was
retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the commercial
loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporations
exposure to a single borrower. This acquisition had the effect
of improving the Corporations regulatory capital ratios
due to the lower risk-weighting of the assets acquired.
Additionally, net interest income improved since the
weighted-average effective yield on the mortgage loans acquired
approximated 5.38% (including non-performing loans) compared to
a yield of approximately 150 basis points over
3-month
LIBOR in the commercial loan to R&G. Partially offsetting
the increase driven by the aforementioned transaction and loan
originations was the securitization of approximately
$305 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. Refer
to the Contractual Obligations and Commitments
discussion below for additional information about outstanding
commitments to sell mortgage loans.
Residential real estate loan production and purchases for the
year ended December 31, 2009 decreased by
$98.5 million, compared to the same period in 2008 and
decreased by $24.8 million for 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007. The decrease in 2009 was primarily due to weak
economic conditions reflected in a continued trend of higher
unemployment rates affecting consumers. Nevertheless, the
Corporations residential mortgage loan originations,
including purchases of $218.4 million, amounted to
$591.9 million in 2009. This excludes the aforementioned
purchase of approximately $205 million of loans that
previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended
to R&G, since the Corporation believes this approach
provides a better representation of the Corporations
residential mortgage loan production capacity.
Residential real estate loans represent 12% of total loans
originated and purchased for 2009. The Corporations
strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a
variety of high quality mortgage products. The
Corporations residential mortgage loan originations
continued to be driven by FirstMortgage, its mortgage loan
origination subsidiary. FirstMortgage supplements its internal
direct originations through its retail network with an indirect
business strategy. The Corporations Partners in Business,
a division of FirstMortgage, partners with mortgage brokers and
small mortgage bankers in Puerto Rico to purchase ongoing
mortgage loan production.
The slight decrease in mortgage loan production for 2008, as
compared to 2007, reflects the lower volume of loans purchased
during 2008. Residential mortgage loan purchases during 2008
amounted to $211.8 million, a decrease of approximately
$58.7 million from 2007. This was due to the impact in 2007
of a purchase of $72.2 million (mainly FHA loans) from a
local financial institution not as part of the ongoing
Corporations Partners in Business Program discussed above.
Meanwhile, internal residential mortgage loan originations
increased by $33.9 million for 2008, as compared to 2007,
favorably affected by legislation approved by the Puerto Rico
Government (Act 197) which provided credits to lenders and
borrowers when individuals purchased certain new or existing
homes.
The credits for lenders and borrowers were as follows:
(a) for a new constructed home that would constitute the
individuals principal residence, a credit equal to 20% of
the sales price or $25,000, whichever was lower; (b) for
new constructed homes that would not constitute the
individuals principal residence, a credit of 10% of the
sales price or $15,000, whichever was lower; and (c) for
existing homes, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $10,000,
whichever was lower.
From the homebuyers perspective: (1) the individual
could not benefit from the credit twice; (2) the amount of
credit granted was credited against the principal amount of the
mortgage; (3) the individual had to acquire the property
before December 31, 2008; and (4) for new constructed
homes constituting the principal residence and existing homes,
the individual had to live in it as his or her principal
residence for at least three consecutive years. Noncompliance
with this requirement will affect only the homebuyers
credit and not the tax credit granted to the financial
institution.
From the financial institutions perspective: (1) the
credit may be used against income taxes, including estimated
taxes, for years commencing after December 31, 2007 in
three installments, subject to certain
94
limitations, between January 1, 2008 and June 30,
2011; (2) the credit may be ceded, sold or otherwise
transferred to any other person; and (3) any tax credit not
used in a given tax year, as certified by the Secretary of
Treasury, may be claimed as a refund.
Loan originations of the Corporation covered by Act 197 amounted
to approximately $90.0 million for 2008.
Commercial
and Construction Loans
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations commercial
and construction loan portfolio increased by
$946.6 million, as compared to the balance as of
December 31, 2008, due mainly to loan originations to the
Puerto Rico Government as discussed below, partially offset by
the aforementioned unwinding of the commercial loan with
R&G, principal repayments and net charge-offs in 2009. A
substantial portion of this portfolio is collateralized by real
estate. The Corporations commercial loans are primarily
variable and adjustable-rate loans.
Total commercial and construction loans originated amounted to
$3.6 billion for 2009, an increase of $935.5 million
when compared to originations during 2008. The increase in
commercial and construction loan production for 2009, compared
to 2008, was mainly driven by approximately $1.7 billion in
credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. The increase in loan originations
related to governmental agencies was partially offset by a
$118.9 million decrease in commercial mortgage loan
originations and a decrease of $179.6 million in floor plan
originations. Floor plan lending activities depends on inventory
levels (autos) financed and their turnover.
The increase in commercial and construction loan production for
2008, compared to 2007, was mainly experienced in Puerto Rico.
Commercial loan originations in Puerto Rico increased by
approximately $269.8 million for 2008. The increase in
commercial loan originations in Puerto Rico was partially offset
by lower construction loan originations in the United States,
which decreased by $144.7 million for 2008, as compared to
2007, due to the slowdown in the U.S. housing market.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had
$1.2 billion outstanding of credit facilities granted to
the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. A substantial portion of these credit
facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment, such as sales and
property taxes collected by the central Government
and/or
municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of
loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates
charged for services or products, such as electric power
utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the
good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality have been pledged to their repayment.
Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its
political subdivisions, the largest loan to one borrower as of
December 31, 2009 in the amount of $321.5 million is
with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial
Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate.
Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk because
they are larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a
single borrower, the Corporation has and continues to develop a
credit risk management infrastructure that mitigates potential
losses associated with commercial lending, including loan review
functions, sales of loan participations, and continuous
monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
Construction loans originations decreased by $42.3 million
due to the strategic decision by the Corporation to reduce its
exposure to construction projects in both Puerto Rico and the
United States. The Corporations construction lending
volume has been stagnant for the last year due to the slowdown
in the U.S. housing market and the current economic
environment in Puerto Rico. The Corporation has reduced its
exposure to condo-conversion loans in its Florida operations and
construction loan originations in Puerto Rico are mainly draws
from existing commitments. More than 70% of the construction
loan originations in 2009 are related to disbursements from
previous established commitments. Current absorption rates in
condo-
95
conversion loans in the United States are low and properties
collateralizing some of these condo-conversion loans have been
formally reverted to rental properties with a future plan for
the sale of converted units upon an improvement in the real
estate market. As of December 31, 2009, approximately
$60.1 million of loans originally disbursed as
condo-conversion construction loans have been formally reverted
to income-producing commercial loans, while the repayment of
interest on the remaining construction condo-conversion loans is
coming principally from rental income and other sources. Given
more conservative underwriting standards of banks in general and
a reduction in market participants in the lending business, the
Corporation believes that the rental market in Florida will
grow. As part of the Corporations initiative to reduce its
exposure to construction projects in Florida, during 2009, the
Corporation completed the sales of four non-performing
construction loans in Florida totaling approximately
$40.4 million. Refer to the discussion under Risk
Management Credit Risk Management
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing
Assets below for additional information.
The composition of the Corporations construction loan
portfolio as of December 31, 2009 by category and
geographic location follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto
|
|
|
Virgin
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
Rico
|
|
|
Islands
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Loans for residential housing projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-rise(1)
|
|
$
|
202,800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
203,359
|
|
Mid-rise(2)
|
|
|
100,433
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
28,125
|
|
|
|
133,029
|
|
Single-family detach
|
|
|
123,807
|
|
|
|
4,166
|
|
|
|
31,186
|
|
|
|
159,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for residential housing projects
|
|
|
427,040
|
|
|
|
8,637
|
|
|
|
59,870
|
|
|
|
495,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential
properties
|
|
|
11,716
|
|
|
|
26,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,352
|
|
Condo-conversion loans
|
|
|
10,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,435
|
|
|
|
80,517
|
|
Loans for commercial projects
|
|
|
324,711
|
|
|
|
117,333
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
443,579
|
|
Bridge loans residential
|
|
|
56,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
57,380
|
|
Bridge loans commercial
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
20,261
|
|
|
|
72,178
|
|
|
|
95,442
|
|
Land loans residential
|
|
|
77,820
|
|
|
|
20,690
|
|
|
|
66,802
|
|
|
|
165,312
|
|
Land loans commercial
|
|
|
61,868
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
27,519
|
|
|
|
90,492
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
29,727
|
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
1,002,062
|
|
|
|
195,677
|
|
|
|
299,624
|
|
|
|
1,497,363
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(3,827
|
)
|
|
|
(865
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(4,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, gross
|
|
|
998,235
|
|
|
|
194,812
|
|
|
|
299,542
|
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(100,007
|
)
|
|
|
(16,380
|
)
|
|
|
(47,741
|
)
|
|
|
(164,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, net
|
|
$
|
898,228
|
|
|
$
|
178,432
|
|
|
$
|
251,801
|
|
|
$
|
1,328,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of the above table, high-rise portfolio is composed
of buildings with more than 7 stories, mainly composed of two
projects that represent approximately 71% of the
Corporations total outstanding high-rise residential
construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Mid-rise relates to buildings up to 7 stories. |
96
The following table presents further information on the
Corporations construction portfolio as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments
|
|
$
|
249,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans in non-accrual status
|
|
$
|
634,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge offs Construction loans(1)
|
|
$
|
183,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses Construction loans
|
|
$
|
164,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans
|
|
|
42.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses construction loans to
total construction loans
|
|
|
11.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to total average construction loans(1)
|
|
|
11.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes charge-offs of $137.4 million related to
construction loans in Florida and $46.2 million related to
construction loans in Puerto Rico. |
The following summarizes the construction loans for residential
housing projects in Puerto Rico segregated by the estimated
selling price of the units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Under $300K
|
|
$
|
142,280
|
|
$300K-$600K
|
|
|
87,306
|
|
Over $600K(1)
|
|
|
197,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
427,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly composed of three high-rise projects and one
single-family detached project that accounts for approximately
67% and 14%, respectively, of the residential housing projects
in Puerto Rico. |
For the majority of the construction loans for residential
housing projects in Florida, the estimated selling price of the
units is under $300,000.
Consumer
Loans and Finance Leases
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations consumer
loan and finance leases portfolio decreased by
$210.3 million, as compared to the portfolio balance as of
December 31, 2008. This is mainly the result of repayments
and charge-offs that on a combined basis more than offset the
volume of loan originations during 2009. Nevertheless, the
Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for
consumer loans and finance leases that amounted to
$61.1 million for 2009, as compared to $66.4 million
for the same period a year ago. The decrease in net charge offs
as compared to 2008 is attributable to the relative stability in
the credit quality of this portfolio and changes in underwriting
standards implemented in late 2005. New originations under these
revised standards have an average life of approximately four
years.
Consumer loan originations are principally driven through the
Corporations retail network. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, consumer loan and finance lease
originations amounted to $595.5 million, a decrease of
$303.3 million or 34% compared to 2008 adversely impacted
by economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States. The
increase of $106.0 million in consumer loan and finance
leases originations in 2008, as compared to 2007, was related to
the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio from
Chrysler Financial Services Caribbean, LLC
(Chrysler) in July 2008. Aside from this
transaction, the consumer loan production decreased by
approximately $112 million, or 14%, for 2008 as compared to
2007 mainly due to adverse economic conditions in Puerto Rico.
Unemployment in Puerto Rico reached 13.7% in December 2008, up
2.7% from the prior year, and in 2009 tops 15%. Consumer loan
originations are driven by auto loan originations through a
strategy of seeking to provide outstanding service to selected
auto dealers who provide the channel for the bulk of the
Corporations auto loan originations. This strategy is
directly linked to our commercial lending activities as the
Corporation maintains strong and stable auto floor plan
relationships,
97
which are the foundation of a successful auto loan generation
operation. The Corporations commercial relations with
floor plan dealers is strong and directly benefits the
Corporations consumer lending operation. Finance leases
are mostly composed of loans to individuals to finance the
acquisition of a motor vehicle and typically have five-year
terms and are collateralized by a security interest in the
underlying assets.
Investment
Activities
As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and
maximize its net interest income, First BanCorp maintains an
investment portfolio that is classified as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity. The Corporations investment portfolio as
of December 31, 2009 amounted to $4.9 billion, a
reduction of $842.5 million when compared with the
investment portfolio of $5.7 billion as of
December 31, 2008. The reduction in the investment
portfolio was the net result of approximately $1.9 billion
in sales of securities, $955 million in calls of
U.S. agency notes and certain obligations of the Puerto
Rico Government, and approximately $959 million of
mortgage-backed securities prepayments; partly offset with
securities purchases of $2.9 billion.
Sales of investments securities during 2009 were approximately
$1.7 billion in MBS (mainly 30 Year U.S. agency
MBS), with a weighted-average yield of 5.49%, $96 million
of US Treasury notes with a weighted average yield of 3.54% and
$100 million of Puerto Rico government obligations with an
average yield of 5.50%.
Purchases of investment securities during 2009 mainly consisted
of U.S. agency callable debentures having contractual
maturities ranging from two to three years (approximately
$1.0 billion at a weighted-average yield of 2.13%),
7-10 Year U.S. Treasury Notes (approximately
$96 million at a weighted-average yield of 3.54%)
subsequently sold,
15-Year
U.S. agency MBS (approximately $1.3 billion at a
weighted-average yield of 3.85%) and floating collateralized
mortgage obligations issued by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC
(approximately $184 million). Also, during 2009, the
Corporation began and completed the securitization of
approximately $305 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into
GNMA MBS.
Over 94% of the Corporations available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity securities portfolio is invested in
U.S. Government and Agency debentures and fixed-rate
U.S. government sponsored-agency MBS (mainly FNMA and FHLMC
fixed-rate securities). The Corporations investment in
equity securities is minimal.
The following table presents the carrying value of investments
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
$
|
76,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations
|
|
|
8,480
|
|
|
|
953,516
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
23,579
|
|
|
|
23,069
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
567,560
|
|
|
|
728,079
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601,619
|
|
|
|
1,706,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations
|
|
|
1,145,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
136,326
|
|
|
|
137,133
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,889,014
|
|
|
|
3,722,992
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
3,862,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities, including $68.4 million and
$62.6 million of FHLB stock as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
64,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
4,866,617
|
|
|
$
|
5,709,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
Mortgage-backed securities as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
$
|
5,015
|
|
|
$
|
8,338
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
562,545
|
|
|
|
719,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,560
|
|
|
|
728,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
|
722,249
|
|
|
|
1,892,358
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
418,312
|
|
|
|
342,674
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
1,507,792
|
|
|
|
1,373,977
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA
|
|
|
156,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through certificates
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
113,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,889,014
|
|
|
|
3,722,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
3,456,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,451,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying values of investment securities classified as
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of December 31,
2009 by contractual maturity (excluding mortgage-backed
securities and equity securities) are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Yield %
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
8,480
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
1,145,139
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153,619
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
11,989
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
113,487
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
25,814
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
8,615
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,905
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,315,524
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,456,574
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
4,772,401
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total proceeds from the sale of securities during the year ended
December 31, 2009 amounted to approximately
$1.9 billion (2008 $680.0 million). The
Corporation realized gross gains of approximately
$82.8 million in 2009 (2008
$17.9 million), and realized gross losses of approximately
$0.2 million in 2008. There were no realized gross losses
in 2009. The Corporation has other equity securities that do not
have a readily available fair value. The carrying value of such
securities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$1.6 million. During 2009, the Corporation realized a gain
of $3.8 million on the sale of VISA Class A
99
stock. Also, during the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation
realized a one-time gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory
redemption of part of its investment in VISA, Inc., which
completed its IPO in March 2008.
For the years ended on December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Corporation recorded OTTI charges of approximately
$0.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, on
certain equity securities held in its available-for-sale
investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto
Rico. Also, OTTI charges of $4.2 million were recorded in
2008 related to auto industry corporate bonds that were
subsequently sold in 2009. Management concluded that the
declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary;
as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to
the market value as of the date of the analysis and was
reflected in earnings as a realized loss. With respect to debt
securitites, in 2009, the Corporation recorded OTTI charges
through earnings of $1.3 million related to the credit loss
portion of available-for-sale private label MBS. Refer to
Note 4 to the Corporations financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K
for additional information regarding the Corporations
evaluation of other-than temporary impairment on
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities.
Net interest income of future periods will be affected by the
acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities
experienced during the year, investments sold, the calls of the
Agency notes, and the subsequent re-investment at lower then
current yields. Also, net interest income in future periods
might be affected by the Corporations investment in
callable securities. Approximately $945 million of
U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.77% were
called during 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation has approximately $1.1 billion in
U.S. agency debentures with embedded calls and with an
average yield of 2.12% (mainly securities with contractual
maturities of 2-3 years acquired in 2009). These risks are
directly linked to future period market interest rate
fluctuations. Refer to the Risk Management section
discussion below for further analysis of the effects of changing
interest rates on the Corporations net interest income and
for the interest rate risk management strategies followed by the
Corporation. Also refer to Note 4 to the Corporations
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for additional information regarding the Corporations
investment portfolio.
Investment
Securities and Loans Receivable Maturities
The following table presents the maturities or repricing of the
loan and investment portfolio as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2-5 Years
|
|
|
Over 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Investments:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
449,798
|
|
|
|
676,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,456,574
|
|
Other securities(2)
|
|
|
96,957
|
|
|
|
1,252,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
571,041
|
|
|
|
1,929,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,365,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,866,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
777,931
|
|
|
|
376,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,461,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,616,283
|
|
C&I and commercial mortgage
|
|
|
5,198,518
|
|
|
|
705,779
|
|
|
|
222,578
|
|
|
|
815,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,942,250
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,436,136
|
|
|
|
24,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
96,453
|
|
|
|
222,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
515,603
|
|
|
|
1,063,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
8,024,641
|
|
|
|
2,393,661
|
|
|
|
222,578
|
|
|
|
3,308,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
$
|
8,595,682
|
|
|
$
|
4,323,353
|
|
|
$
|
222,578
|
|
|
$
|
5,674,230
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,815,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Scheduled repayments reported in the maturity category in which
the payment is due and variable rates according to repricing
frequency. |
100
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Equity securities available-for-sale, other equity securities
and loans having no stated scheduled of repayment and no stated
maturity were included under the one year or less
category. |
|
(3) |
|
Non-accruing loans were included under the one year or
less category. |
Goodwill
and other intangible assets
Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
are recorded at estimated fair value as of the date of
acquisition. After initial recognition, any resulting intangible
assets are accounted for as follows:
Goodwill
The Corporation evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there
may be an impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed
at the segment (or reporting unit) level. Goodwill
is assigned to reporting units at the date the goodwill is
initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to reporting
units, it no longer retains its association with a particular
acquisition, and all of the activities within a reporting unit,
whether acquired or internally generated, are available to
support the value of the goodwill. The Corporations
goodwill is mainly related to the acquisition of FirstBank
Florida in 2005. Effective July 1, 2009, the operations
conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate entity were merged
with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. The
first step (Step 1) involves a comparison of the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit (FirstBank Florida)
to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill
is not considered impaired. If the carrying value exceeds
estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential
impairment and the second step is performed to measure the
amount of the impairment.
The second step (Step 2) involves calculating an implied
fair value of the goodwill for each reporting unit for which the
first step indicated a potential impairment. The implied fair
value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the
calculation of the amount of goodwill in a business combination,
by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the
aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets,
liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting
unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the
implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of
goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment.
If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit
exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment
charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot
exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting
unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill.
Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not
permitted.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit and based on
the nature of the business and reporting units current and
expected financial performance, the Corporation uses a
combination of methods, including market price multiples of
comparable companies, as well as discounted cash flow analysis
(DCF). The Corporation evaluates the results
obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and
understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the
results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances.
The computations require management to make estimates and
assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these
evaluations include:
|
|
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on
nature of business, location and size;
|
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an
estimate of the cost of equity;
|
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and
|
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions.
|
101
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuation was
determined by calculating median price to book value and price
to tangible equity multiples of the comparable companies and
applied these multiples to the reporting unit to derive an
implied value of equity.
For purposes of the DCF analysis approach, the valuation is
based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections
used in the DCF analysis for the reporting unit are based on the
most recent (as of the valuation date). The growth assumptions
included in these projections are based on managements
expectations of the reporting units financial prospects as
well as particular plans for the entity (i.e. restructuring
plans). The cost of equity was estimated using the capital asset
pricing model (CAPM) using comparable companies, an equity risk
premium, the rate of return of a riskless asset, and
a size premium. The discount rate was estimated to be
14.0 percent. The resulting discount rate was analyzed in
terms of reasonability given current market conditions.
The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill
during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Step 1 evaluation of
goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one
level below the United States business segment, indicated
potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the
unit under both valuation approaches (market and DCF) was below
the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation
date (December 31), requiring the completion of Step 2. In
accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation performed
a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit,
including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to
determine the fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the
Corporation subtracted from the units Step 1 fair value
the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the
implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2
analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill
exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $27 million,
resulting in no goodwill impairment. The analysis of results for
Step 2 indicated that the reduction in the fair value of the
reporting unit was mainly attributable to the deteriorated fair
value of the loan portfolios and not the fair value of the
reporting unit as going concern. The discount in the loan
portfolios is mainly attributable to market participants
expected rates of returns, which affected the market discount on
the Florida commercial mortgage and residential mortgage
portfolios. The fair value of the loan portfolio determined for
the Florida reporting unit represented a discount of 22.5%.
The reduction in Florida unit Step 1 fair value was offset by a
reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an
implied fair value of goodwill that exceeded the recorded book
value of goodwill. If the Step 1 fair value of the Florida unit
declines further without a corresponding decrease in the fair
value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a
corresponding increase in the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation
may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The
Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist management
in the annual evaluation of the Florida unit goodwill (including
Step 1 and Step 2), including the valuation of loan portfolios
as of the December 31 valuation date. In reaching its conclusion
on impairment, management discussed with the valuator the
methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the relevant
values for the goodwill and determined that they were reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the
Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to
the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could
result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn,
negatively impact the Corporations results of operations
and the reporting unit where goodwill is recorded.
Goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2009 or 2008,
nor was any goodwill written-off due to impairment during 2009,
2008 and 2007.
Other
Intangibles
Definite life intangibles, mainly core deposits, are amortized
over their estimated life, generally on a straight-line basis,
and are reviewed periodically for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable.
As previously discussed, as a result of an impairment evaluation
of core deposit intangibles, there was an impairment charge of
$4.0 million recorded in 2009 related to core deposits of
FirstBank Florida attributable to decreases in the base of
acquired core deposits. The Corporation performed impairment
tests for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
determined that no impairment was needed to be recognized for
those periods for other intangible assets.
102
RISK
MANAGEMENT
General
Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the
Corporations business activities and operations.
Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the
success of the Corporation. The primary goals of risk management
are to ensure that the Corporations risk taking activities
are consistent with the Corporations objectives and risk
tolerance and that there is an appropriate balance between risk
and reward in order to maximize stockholder value.
The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to
monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in
conducting its activities. First BanCorps business is
subject to eight broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity
risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) market risk,
(4) credit risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal
and compliance risk, (7) reputational risk, and
(8) contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies
and procedures designed to identify and manage risks to which
the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to
liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, and operational
risk.
Risk
Definition
Liquidity
Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from
the possibility that the Corporation will not have sufficient
cash to meet the short-term liquidity demands such as from
deposit redemptions or loan commitments. Refer to
Liquidity and Capital Adequacy section below for further
details.
Interest
Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising
from adverse movements in interest rates, refer to
Interest Rate Risk Management section below for further
details.
Market
Risk
Market risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from
adverse movements in market rates or prices, such as interest
rates or equity prices. The Corporation evaluates market risk
together with interest rate risk, refer to Interest
Rate Risk Management section below for further details.
Credit
Risk
Credit risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from a
borrowers or a counterpartys failure to meet the
terms of a contract with the Corporation or otherwise to perform
as agreed. Refer to Credit Risk Management
section below for further details.
Operational
Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate
or failed internal processes, people and systems or from
external events. This risk is inherent across all functions,
products and services of the Corporation. Refer to
Operational Risk section below for further details.
Legal
and Regulatory Risk
Legal and regulatory risk is the risk to earnings and capital
arising from the Corporations failure to comply with laws
or regulations that can adversely affect the Corporations
reputation
and/or
increase its exposure to litigation.
103
Reputational
Risk
Reputational risk is the risk to earnings and capital arising
from any adverse impact on the Corporations market value,
capital or earnings of negative public opinion, whether true or
not. This risk affects the Corporations ability to
establish new relationships or services, or to continue
servicing existing relationships.
Contingency
Risk
Contingency risk is the risk to earnings and capital associated
with the Corporations preparedness for the occurrence of
an unforeseen event.
Risk
Governance
The following discussion highlights the roles and
responsibilities of the key participants in the
Corporations risk management framework:
Board
of Directors
The Board of Directors oversees the Corporations overall
risk governance program with the assistance of the Asset and
Liability Committee, Credit Committee and the Audit Committee in
executing this responsibility.
Asset
and Liability Committee
The Asset and Liability Committee of the Corporation is
appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board of
Directors in its oversight of the Corporations policies
and procedures related to asset and liability management
relating to funds management, investment management, liquidity,
interest rate risk management, capital adequacy and use of
derivatives. In doing so, the Committees primary general
functions involve:
|
|
|
|
|
The establishment of a process to enable the recognition,
assessment, and management of risks that could affect the
Corporations assets and liabilities management;
|
|
|
|
The identification of the Corporations risk tolerance
levels for yield maximization relating to its assets and
liabilities;
|
|
|
|
The evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the
Corporations risk management process relating to the
Corporations assets and liabilities, including
managements role in that process; and
|
|
|
|
The evaluation of the Corporations compliance with its
risk management process relating to the Corporations
assets and liabilities.
|
Credit
Committee
The Credit Committee of the Board of Directors is appointed by
the Board of Directors to assist them in its oversight of the
Corporations policies and procedures related to all
matters of the Corporations lending function. In doing so,
the Committees primary general functions involve:
|
|
|
|
|
The establishment of a process to enable the identification,
assessment, and management of risks that could affect the
Corporations credit management;
|
|
|
|
The identification of the Corporations risk tolerance
levels related to its credit management;
|
|
|
|
The evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the
Corporations risk management process related to the
Corporations credit management, including
managements role in that process;
|
|
|
|
The evaluation of the Corporations compliance with its
risk management process related to the Corporations credit
management; and
|
|
|
|
The approval of loans as required by the lending authorities
approved by the Board of Directors.
|
104
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee of First BanCorp is appointed by the Board
of Directors to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its
responsibility to oversee management regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
The conduct and integrity of the Corporations financial
reporting to any governmental or regulatory body, shareholders,
other users of the Corporations financial reports and the
public;
|
|
|
|
The Corporations systems of internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures;
|
|
|
|
The qualifications, engagement, compensation, independence and
performance of the Corporations independent auditors,
their conduct of the annual audit of the Corporations
financial statements, and their engagement to provide any other
services;
|
|
|
|
The Corporations legal and regulatory compliance;
|
|
|
|
The application for the Corporations related person
transaction policy as established by the Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The application of the Corporations code of business
conduct and ethics as established by management and the Board of
Directors; and
|
|
|
|
The preparation of the Audit Committee report required to be
included in the Corporations annual proxy statement by the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
In performing this function, the Audit Committee is assisted by
the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), the General Auditor
and the Risk Management Council (RMC), and other
members of senior management.
Strategic
Planning Committee
The Strategic Planning Committee of the Corporation is appointed
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation to assist and
advise management with respect to, and monitor and oversee on
behalf of the Board, corporate development activities not in the
ordinary course of the Corporations business and strategic
alternatives under consideration from time to time by the
Corporation, including, but not limited to, acquisitions,
mergers, alliances, joint ventures, divestitures, capitalization
of the Corporation and other similar corporate transactions.
Risk
Management Council
The Risk Management Council is appointed by the Chief Executive
Officer to assist the Corporation in overseeing, and receiving
information regarding the Corporations policies,
procedures and practices related to the Corporations
risks. In doing so, the Councils primary general functions
involve:
|
|
|
|
|
The appointment of persons responsible for the
Corporations significant risks;
|
|
|
|
The development of the risk management infrastructure needed to
enable it to monitor risk policies and limits established by the
Board of Directors;
|
|
|
|
The evaluation of the risk management process to identify any
gap and the implementation of any necessary control to close
such gap;
|
|
|
|
The establishment of a process to enable the recognition,
assessment, and management of risks that could affect the
Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
The provision to the Board of Directors of appropriate
information about the Corporations risks.
|
Refer to Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Liquidity,
Operational, Legal and Regulatory Risk Management
Operational Risk discussion below for further details of
matters discussed in the Risk Management Council.
105
Other
Management Committees
As part of its governance framework, the Corporation has various
additional risk management related-committees. These committees
are jointly responsible for ensuring adequate risk measurement
and management in their respective areas of authority. At the
management level, these committees include:
(1) Managements Investment and Asset Liability
Committee (MIALCO) oversees interest
rate and market risk, liquidity management and other related
matters. Refer to Liquidity Risk and Capital
Adequacy and Interest Rate Risk Management discussions
below for further details.
(2) Information Technology Steering Committee
is responsible for the oversight of and counsel on matters
related to information technology including the development of
information management policies and procedures throughout the
Corporation.
(3) Bank Secrecy Act Committee is responsible
for oversight, monitoring and reporting of the
Corporations compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act.
(4) Credit Committees (Delinquency and Credit Management
Committee) oversees and establishes standards for
credit risk management processes within the Corporation. The
Credit Management Committee is responsible for the approval of
loans above an established size threshold. The Delinquency
Committee is responsible for the periodic review of
(1) past due loans, (2) overdrafts,
(3) non-accrual loans, (4) other real estate owned
(OREO) assets, and (5) the banks watch
list and non-performing loans.
(5) Florida Executive Steering Committee
oversees implementation and compliance of policies approved by
the Board of Directors and the performance of the Florida
regions operations. The Florida Executive Steering
Committee evaluates and monitors interrelated risks related to
FirstBanks operations in Florida.
Officers
As part of its governance framework, the following officers play
a key role in the Corporations risk management process:
(1) Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the overall
risk governance structure of the Corporation.
(2) Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the oversight of
the risk management organization as well as risk governance
processes. In addition, the CRO with the collaboration of the
Risk Assessment Manager manages the operational risk program.
(3) Chief Credit Risk Officer and the Chief Lending Officer
are responsible of managing the Corporations credit risk
program.
(4) Chief Financial Officer in combination with the
Corporations Treasurer, manages the Corporations
interest rate and market and liquidity risks programs and,
together with the Corporations Chief Accounting Officer,
is responsible for the implementation of accounting policies and
practices in accordance with GAAP and applicable regulatory
requirements. The Chief Financial Officer is assisted by the
Risk Assessment Manager in the review of the Corporations
internal control over financial reporting.
(5) Chief Accounting Officer is responsible for the
development and implementation of the Corporations
accounting policies and practices and the review and monitoring
of critical accounts and transactions to ensure that they are
managed in accordance with GAAP and applicable regulatory
requirements.
Other
Officers
In addition to a centralized Enterprise Risk Management
function, certain lines of business and corporate functions have
their own Risk Managers and support staff. The Risk Managers,
while reporting directly within
106
their respective line of business or function, facilitate
communications with the Corporations risk functions and
work in partnership with the CRO and CFO to ensure alignment
with sound risk management practices and expedite the
implementation of the enterprise risk management framework and
policies.
Liquidity
and Capital Adequacy, Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk,
Operational, Legal and Regulatory Risk Management
The following discussion highlights First BanCorps adopted
policies and procedures for liquidity risk, interest rate risk,
credit risk, operational risk, legal and regulatory risk.
Liquidity
Risk and Capital Adequacy
Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability
maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and
business operations, and meet contractual obligations through
unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates.
Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements
and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs and
accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to
changes in the Corporations business operations or
unanticipated events.
The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is
the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding
company that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The
second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiary. The Asset and
Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
establishing the Corporations liquidity policy as well as
approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring
liquidity on an ongoing basis. The MIALCO, using measures of
liquidity developed by management, which involve the use of
several assumptions, reviews the Corporations liquidity
position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity
management, interest rate risk and other related matters. The
MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors Asset and
Liability Committee, is composed of senior management officers,
including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Wholesale Banking
Executive, the Retail Financial Services & Strategic
Planning Director, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and
Investments Division, the Asset/Liability Manager and the
Treasurer. The Treasury and Investments Division is responsible
for planning and executing the Corporations funding
activities and strategy; monitors liquidity availability on a
daily basis and reviews liquidity measures on a weekly basis.
The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area of
the Comptrollers Department is responsible for calculating
the liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment
Division to review the Corporations liquidity position.
In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of
potential operating environments and market conditions, the
Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business
activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding
stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this
operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued
development of customer-based funding, the maintenance of direct
relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and the
maintenance of the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and
if, requirements warrant.
The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding
plans. These plans evaluate the Corporations liquidity
position under various operating circumstances and allow the
Corporation to ensure that it will be able to operate through
periods of stress when access to normal sources of funding is
constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a
potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of
liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively
managing through a difficult period, and define roles and
responsibilities. In the Contingency Funding Plan, the
Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity
position to critical levels that imply difficulties in getting
new funds or even maintaining its current funding position,
thereby ensuring the ability to honor its commitments, and
establishing liquidity triggers monitored by the MIALCO in order
to maintain the ordinary funding of the banking business. Three
different scenarios are defined in the Contingency Funding Plan:
local market event, credit rating downgrade, and a concentration
event. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of
Directors Asset and Liability Committee.
107
The Corporation manages its liquidity in a proactive manner, and
maintains an adequate position. Multiple measures are utilized
to monitor the Corporations liquidity position, including
basic surplus and volatile liabilities measures. Among the
actions taken in recent months to bolster the liquidity position
and to safeguard the Corporations access to credit was the
posting of additional collateral to the FHLB, thereby increasing
borrowing capacity. The Corporation has also maintained the
basic surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term
liabilities, and secured lines of credit) well in excess of the
self-imposed minimum limit of 5% of total assets. As of
December 31, 2009, the estimated basic surplus ratio of
approximately 8.6% included unpledged investment securities,
FHLB lines of credit, and cash. As of December 31, 2009,
the Corporation had $378 million available for additional
credit on FHLB lines of credit. Unpledged liquid securities as
of December 31, 2009 mainly consisted of fixed-rate MBS and
U.S. agency debentures totaling approximately
$646.9 million. The Corporation does not rely on
uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal funds lines) to
fund its operations and does not include them in the basic
surplus computation.
Sources
of Funding
The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help
ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when
needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great
importance to protect the Corporations liquidity from
market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds
are deposits, including brokered CDs, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB and
the FED. The Asset Liability Committee of the Board of Directors
reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation
has also securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary
source of funding. Commercial paper has also in the past
provided additional funding. Long-term funding has also been
obtained through the issuance of notes and, to a lesser extent,
long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different alternatives
and interest rate risk management strategies, among other
things, is taken into consideration.
The Corporations principal sources of funding are:
Deposits
The following table presents the composition of total deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate as of
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,774,273
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,179
|
|
|
$
|
1,036,662
|
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
985,470
|
|
|
|
726,731
|
|
|
|
518,570
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
9,212,282
|
|
|
|
10,416,592
|
|
|
|
8,857,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
|
|
11,972,025
|
|
|
|
12,431,502
|
|
|
|
10,412,637
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697,022
|
|
|
|
625,928
|
|
|
|
621,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
$
|
13,057,430
|
|
|
$
|
11,034,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,387,958
|
|
|
$
|
11,282,353
|
|
|
$
|
10,755,719
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
715,982
|
|
|
$
|
682,496
|
|
|
$
|
563,990
|
|
Weighted average rate during the period on interest-bearing
deposits(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes changes in fair value of callable brokered CDs measured
at fair value and changes in the fair value of derivatives that
economically hedge brokered CDs . |
|
|
|
Brokered CDs A large portion of the
Corporations funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the
Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs
decreased from $8.4 billion at year end 2008 to
$7.6 billion as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation
has been partly refinancing brokered CDs that |
108
|
|
|
|
|
matured or were called during 2009 with alternate sources of
funding at a lower cost. Also, the Corporation shifted the
funding emphasis to retail deposits to reduce reliance on
brokered CDs. |
|
|
|
In the event that the Corporations Bank subsidiary falls
below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the
risk of not being able to replace funding through this source.
Only a well capitalized insured depository institution is
allowed to solicit and accept, renew or roll over any brokered
deposit without restriction. The Bank currently complies and
exceeds the minimum requirements of ratios for a
well-capitalized institution. As of
December 31, 2009, the Banks total and Tier I
capital exceed by $410 million and $814 million,
respectively, the minimum well-capitalized levels. The average
term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 is approximately 1 year.
Approximately 2% of the principal value of these certificates is
callable at the Corporations option. |
|
|
|
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the
growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense
competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits
in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and
liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial
amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy
enhances the Corporations liquidity position, since the
brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and
can be obtained faster and cheaper compared to regular retail
deposits. The brokered CDs market continues to be a reliable
source to fulfill the Corporations needs for the issuance
of new and replacement transactions. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Corporation issued $8.3 billion
in brokered CDs (including rollovers of short-term broker CDs
and replacement of brokered CDs called) at an average rate of
0.97% compared to $9.8 billion at an average rate of 3.64%
issued in 2008. |
|
|
|
The following table presents a maturity summary of brokered and
retail CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher as of
December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
1,958,454
|
|
Over three months to six months
|
|
|
1,366,163
|
|
Over six months to one year
|
|
|
2,258,717
|
|
Over one year
|
|
|
2,969,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,552,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or higher
include brokered CDs of $7.6 billion issued to deposit
brokers in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of
deposit that are generally participated out by brokers in shares
of less than $100,000 and are therefore insured by the FDIC.
Certificates of deposit also include $25.6 million of
deposits through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry
Service (CDARS). In an effort to meet customer needs and provide
its customers with the best products and services available, the
Corporations bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico, has
joined a program that gives depositors the opportunity to insure
their money beyond the standard FDIC coverage. CDARS can offer
customers access to FDIC insurance coverage of up to
$50 million, when they enter into the CDARS Deposit
Placement Agreement, while earning attractive returns on their
deposits. |
|
|
|
Retail deposits The Corporations
deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand
deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. Total
deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased by $480 million
from the balance as of December 31, 2008, reflecting
increases in core-deposit products such as savings and
interest-bearing checking accounts. A significant portion of the
increase was related to deposits in Puerto Rico, the
Corporations primary market, reflecting successful
marketing campaigns and cross-selling initiatives. The increase
was also related to increases in money market accounts in
Florida, as management shifted the funding emphasis to retail
deposits to reduce reliance on brokered CDs. Successful
marketing campaigns and attractive rates were the main reasons
for the increase in Florida. Even thought rates offered in
Florida were higher for this product, rates were lower than
those offered in Puerto Rico. Refer to Note 13 in the
Corporations financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further details. |
109
Borrowings
As of December 31, 2009, total borrowings amounted to
$5.2 billion as compared to $4.7 billion and
$4.5 billion as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The following table presents the composition of total borrowings
as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate as of
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
|
3.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,421,042
|
|
|
$
|
3,094,646
|
|
Loans payable(1)
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
|
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
1,060,440
|
|
|
|
1,103,000
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
27,117
|
|
|
|
23,274
|
|
|
|
30,543
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
2.86
|
%
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
231,914
|
|
|
|
231,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,214,147
|
|
|
$
|
4,736,670
|
|
|
$
|
4,460,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average rate during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Advances from the FED under the FED Discount Window Program. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2009 that are
tied to variable rates or matured within a year. |
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase The Corporations investment
portfolio is substantially funded with repurchase agreements.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements were
$3.1 billion at December 31, 2009, compared with
$3.4 billion at December 31, 2008. One of the
Corporations strategies is the use of structured
repurchase agreements and long-term repurchase agreements to
reduce exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the final
maturities of its liabilities while keeping funding cost at
reasonable levels. Of the total of $3.1 billion repurchase
agreements outstanding as of December 31, 2009,
approximately $2.4 billion consist of structured
repos and $500 million of long-term repos. The access
to this type of funding was affected by the liquidity turmoil in
the financial markets witnessed in the second half of 2008 and
in 2009. Certain counterparties have not been willing to enter
into additional repurchase agreements and the capacity to extend
the term of maturing repurchase agreements has also been
reduced, however, the Corporation has been able to keep access
to credit by using cost effective sources such as FED and FHLB
advances. Refer to Note 15 in the Corporations
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for further details about repurchase agreements outstanding by
counterparty and maturities. |
|
|
|
Under the Corporations repurchase agreements, as is the
case with derivative contracts, the Corporation is required to
pledge cash or qualifying securities to meet margin
requirements. To the extent that the value of securities
previously pledged as collateral declines due to changes in
interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the
Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or
securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely
affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral
pledged, recently the Corporation has not experienced
significant margin calls from counterparties arising from
credit-quality-related write-downs in valuations with only
$0.95 million of cash equivalent instruments deposited in
connection with collateralized interest rate swap agreements. |
|
|
|
Advances from the FHLB The Corporations
Bank subsidiary is a member of the FHLB system and obtains
advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement
with the FHLB that requires the Bank to maintain minimum
qualifying mortgages as collateral for advances taken. As of
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
outstanding balance of FHLB advances was $978.4 million and
$1.1 billion, respectively. Approximately
$653.4 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB has
maturities over one year. As part of its precautionary
initiatives to safeguard access to credit and the low level of
interest rates, the Corporation has been increasing its pledging
of assets to the FHLB, while at the same time the FHLB has been
revising their credit guidelines and haircuts in the
computation of availability of credit lines. |
110
|
|
|
|
|
FED Discount window FED initiatives to ease
the credit crisis have included cuts to the discount rate, which
was lowered from 4.75% to 0.50% through eight separate actions
since December 2007, and adjustments to previous practices to
facilitate financing for longer periods. That made the FED
Discount Window a viable source of funding given market
conditions in 2009. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation had $900 million outstanding in short-term
borrowings from the FED Discount Window and had collateral
pledged related to this credit facility amounted to
$1.2 billion, mainly commercial, consumer and mortgage loan. |
|
|
|
Credit Lines The Corporation maintains
unsecured and un-committed lines of credit with other banks. As
of December 31, 2009, the Corporations total unused
lines of credit with other banks amounted to $165 million.
The Corporation has not used these lines of credit to fund its
operations. |
Though currently not in use, other sources of short-term funding
for the Corporation include commercial paper and federal funds
purchased. Furthermore, in previous years the Corporation has
entered into several financing transactions to diversify its
funding sources, including the issuance of notes payable and
Junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term
liquidity and capital management activities. No assurance can be
given that these sources of liquidity will be available and, if
available, will be on comparable terms. The Corporation
continues to evaluate its financing options, including available
options resulting from recent federal government initiatives to
deal with the crisis in the financial markets.
In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a statutory trust that is
wholly owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in the
Corporations financial statements, sold to institutional
investors $100 million of its variable rate trust preferred
securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the
proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million
of FBP Statutory Trust I variable rate common securities,
were used by FBP Statutory Trust I to purchase
$103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the
Corporations Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures.
Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust
that is wholly-owned by the Corporation and not consolidated in
the Corporations financial statements, sold to
institutional investors $125 million of its variable rate
trust preferred securities. The proceeds of the issuance,
together with the proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of
$3.9 million of FBP Statutory Trust II variable rate
common securities, were used by FBP Statutory Trust II to
purchase $128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the
Corporations Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures.
The trust preferred debentures are presented in the
Corporations Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
as Other Borrowings, net of related issuance costs. The variable
rate trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Corporation. The $100 million Junior
Subordinated Deferrable Debentures issued by the Corporation in
April 2004 and the $125 million issued in September 2004
mature on September 17, 2034 and September 20, 2034,
respectively; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity
of Junior Subordinated Debentures may be shortened (such
shortening would result in a mandatory redemption of the
variable rate trust preferred securities). The trust preferred
securities, subject to certain limitations, qualify as
Tier I regulatory capital under current Federal Reserve
rules and regulations.
The Corporations principal uses of funds are the
origination of loans and the repayment of maturing deposits and
borrowings. Over the last five years, the Corporation has
committed substantial resources to its mortgage banking
subsidiary, FirstMortgage, Inc. As a result, residential real
estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have
increased over time from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 26% at
December 31, 2009. Commensurate with the increase in its
mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested
in technology and personnel to enhance the Corporations
secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced
capabilities improve the Corporations liquidity profile as
they allow the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from
the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. The
U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is
still highly liquid in large part because of the sale or
guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. In
December 2008, the Corporation obtained from GNMA Commitment
Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this
program, during 2009, the Corporation completed the
securitization of approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA
mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. Any regulatory actions affecting
GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC could adversely affect the secondary
mortgage market.
111
Credit
Ratings
The Corporations credit as a long-term issuer is currently
rated B by Standard & Poors
(S&P) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited
(Fitch); both with negative outlook.
At the FirstBank subsidiary level, long-term senior debt is
currently rated B1 by Moodys Investor Service
(Moodys), four notches below their definition of
investment grade; B by S&P, and B by Fitch, both five
notches below their definition of investment grade. The outlook
on the Banks credit ratings from the three rating agencies
is negative.
The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative
agreements that would be affected by the recent credit
downgrades. The Corporations liquidity is contingent upon
its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its
operations. Any further downgrades in credit ratings can hinder
the Corporations access to external funding
and/or cause
external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn
adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any change in
credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities
and unsecured derivatives that consider the Corporations
own credit risk as part of the valuation.
Cash
Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $704.1 million and
$405.7 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. These balances increased by $298.4 million
and $26.8 million from December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The following discussion highlights the major
activities and transactions that affected the Corporations
cash flows during 2009 and 2008.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
First BanCorps operating assets and liabilities vary
significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount
and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from
operations, available cash balances and the Corporations
ability to generate cash through short- and long-term borrowings
will be sufficient to fund the Corporations operating
liquidity needs.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by
operating activities was $243.2 million. Net cash generated
from operating activities was higher than net loss reported
largely as a result of adjustments for operating items such as
the provision for loan and lease losses and non-cash charges
recorded to increase the Corporations valuation allowance
for deferred tax assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash provided by
operating activities was $175.9 million, which was higher
than net income, largely as a result of adjustments for
operating items such as the provision for loan and lease losses
and depreciation and amortization.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
The Corporations investing activities primarily include
originating loans to be held to maturity and its
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
investment portfolios. For the year ended December 31,
2009, net cash of $381.8 million was used in investing
activities, primarily for loan origination disbursements and
purchases of
available-for-sale
investment securities to mitigate in part the impact of
investments securities mainly U.S. Agency debentures,
called by counterparties prior to maturity and MBS prepayments.
Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from sales
and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities as well as proceeds from
held-to-maturity
securities called during 2009, and proceeds from loans and from
MBS repayments.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used by
investing activities was $2.3 billion, primarily for
purchases of
available-for-sale
investment securities as market conditions presented an
opportunity for the Corporation to obtain attractive yields,
improve its net interest margin and mitigate the impact of
investment securities, mainly U.S. Agency debentures,
called by counterparties prior to maturity, for loan
originations disbursements and for the purchase of a
$218 million auto loan portfolio. Partially offsetting
these uses of cash were proceeds from sales and maturities of
available-for-sale
securities as well as proceeds from
112
held-to-maturity
securities called during 2008; proceeds from sales of loans and
the gain on the mandatory redemption of part of the
Corporations investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its
initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
The Corporations financing activities primarily include
the receipt of deposits and issuance of brokered CDs, the
issuance and payments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity
instruments and activities related to its short-term funding. In
addition, the Corporation paid monthly dividends on its
preferred stock and quarterly dividends on its common stock
until it announced the suspension of dividends beginning in
August 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash
provided by financing activities was $436.9 million due to
the investment of $400 million by the U.S. Treasury in
preferred stock of the Corporation through the
U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program and the use of
the FED Discount Window Program as a low-cost funding source to
finance the Corporations investing activities. Partially
offsetting these cash proceeds was the payment of cash dividends
and pay down of maturing borrowings, in particular brokered CDs
and repurchase agreements.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used in
financing activities was $2.1 billion due to increases in
its deposit base, including brokered CDs to finance lending
activities and increase liquidity levels and increases in
securities sold under repurchase agreements to finance the
Corporations securities inventory. Partially offsetting
these cash proceeds was the payment of cash dividends.
Capital
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to
$1.6 billion as of December 31, 2009, an increase of
$50.9 million compared to the balance as of
December 31, 2008, driven by the $400 million
investment by the United States Department of the Treasury (the
U.S. Treasury) in preferred stock of the
Corporation through the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. This was partially
offset by the net loss of $275.2 million recorded for 2009,
dividends paid amounting to $43.1 million in 2009
($13.0 million in common stock, or $0.14 per share, and
$30.1 million in preferred stock) and a $30.9 million
decrease in other comprehensive income mainly due to a
noncredit-related impairment of $31.7 million on private
label MBS.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation
declared in aggregate cash dividends of $0.14 per common share,
$0.28 for 2008, and $0.28 for 2007. Total cash dividends paid on
common shares amounted to $13.0 million for 2009,
$25.9 million for 2008, and $24.6 million for 2007.
Dividends declared on preferred stock amounted to
$30.1 million in 2009 and $40.3 million in 2008 and
2007.
On July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension
of dividends on common and all its outstanding series of
preferred stock, including the TARP preferred dividends. This
suspension was effective with the dividends for the month of
August 2009 on the Corporations five outstanding series of
non-cumulative preferred stock and the dividends for the
Corporations outstanding Series F Cumulative
Preferred Stock and the Corporations common stock. The
Corporation took this prudent action to preserve capital, as the
duration and depth of recessionary economic conditions is
uncertain, and consistent with federal regulatory guidance.
As of December 31, 2009, First BanCorp and FirstBank Puerto
Rico were in compliance with regulatory capital requirements
that were applicable to them as a financial holding company and
a state non-member bank, respectively (i.e., total capital and
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and
4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of
at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorps, and
FirstBank Puerto Ricos regulatory capital ratios as of
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, based on
existing Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation guidelines. Effective July 1, the operations
conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate subsidiary were
merged with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the
Corporations main banking subsidiary. As part of the
Corporations strategic planning it was determined that
business synergies would be achieved by merging FirstBank
Florida with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico. This reorganization
included the consolidation of FirstBank Puerto Ricos loan
production office with the former
113
thrift banking operations of FirstBank Florida. For the last
three years prior to July 1, the Corporation conducted dual
banking operations in the Florida market. The consolidation of
the former thrift banking operations with the loan production
office resulted in FirstBank Puerto Rico having a more
diversified and efficient banking operation in the form of a
branch network in the Florida market. The merger allows the
Florida operations to benefit by leveraging the capital position
of FirstBank Puerto Rico and thereby provide them with the
support necessary to grow in the Florida market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Subsidiary
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
To be Well
|
|
|
BanCorp
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
12.87
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
|
11.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
12.80
|
%
|
|
|
12.23
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
11.55
|
%
|
|
|
10.98
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
The increase in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to
the $400 million investment by the U.S. Treasury in
preferred stock of the Corporation through the
U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase Program. Refer to
Note 23 in the Corporations financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K
for additional information regarding this issuance. The funds
were used in part to strengthen the Corporations lending
programs and ability to support growth strategies that are
centered on customers needs, including programs to
preserve home ownership. Together with private and public sector
initiatives, the Corporation looks to support the local economy
and the communities it serves during the current economic
environment.
The Corporation is well-capitalized, having sound margins over
minimum well-capitalized regulatory requirements. As of
December 31, 2009, the total regulatory capital ratio is
13.4% and the Tier 1 capital ratio is 12.2%. This
translates to approximately $492 million and
$881 million of total capital and Tier 1 capital,
respectively, in excess of the total capital and Tier 1
capital well capitalized requirements of 10% and 6%,
respectively. A key priority for the Corporation is to maintain
a sound capital position to absorb any potential future credit
losses due to the distressed economic environment and to provide
business expansion opportunities.
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio was 3.20% as
of December 31, 2009, compared to 4.87% as of
December 31, 2008, and the Tier 1 common equity to
risk-weighted assets ratio as of December 31, 2009 was
4.10% compared to 5.92% as of December 31, 2008.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share are non-GAAP measures generally used by financial
analysts and investment bankers to evaluate capital adequacy.
Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity,
goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Tangible Assets are total
assets less goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Management
and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and
tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more
traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy
of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or
other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the
purchase accounting method for mergers and acquisitions. Neither
tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures
should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
stockholders equity, total assets or any other measure
calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in
which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity,
tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from
that of other companies reporting measures with similar
114
names. The following table is a reconciliation of the
Corporations tangible common equity and tangible assets
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total equity GAAP
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,548,117
|
|
Preferred equity
|
|
|
(928,508
|
)
|
|
|
(550,100
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
(23,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$
|
625,857
|
|
|
$
|
945,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets GAAP
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
$
|
19,491,268
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
(23,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
19,583,750
|
|
|
$
|
19,439,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
10.22
|
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is
calculated by dividing (a) tier 1 capital less
non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred
stock and qualifying trust preferred securities, by
(b) risk-weighted assets, which assets are calculated in
accordance with applicable bank regulatory requirements. The
Tier 1 common equity ratio is not required by GAAP or on a
recurring basis by applicable bank regulatory requirements.
However, this ratio was used by the Federal Reserve in
connection with its stress test administered to the 19 largest
U.S. bank holding companies under the Supervisory Capital
Assessment Program (SCAP), the results of which were
announced on May 7, 2009. Management is currently
monitoring this ratio, along with the other ratios set forth in
the table above, in evaluating the Corporations capital
levels.
The following table reconciles stockholders equity (GAAP)
to Tier 1 common equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total equity GAAP
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,548,117
|
|
Qualifying preferred stock
|
|
|
(928,508
|
)
|
|
|
(550,100
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities(1)
|
|
|
(26,617
|
)
|
|
|
(57,389
|
)
|
Disallowed deferred tax asset(2)
|
|
|
(11,827
|
)
|
|
|
(69,810
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
(23,985
|
)
|
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities accounted
for under a fair value option
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
(3,473
|
)
|
Other disallowed assets
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity
|
|
$
|
585,854
|
|
|
$
|
814,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
14,303,496
|
|
|
$
|
13,762,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
debt securities and net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in
accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In
arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to
deduct net unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of
tax. |
115
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $111 million of the Corporations
deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 (December 31,
2008 $58 million) were included without
limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based
capital guidelines, while approximately $12 million of such
assets at December 31, 2009 (December 31,
2008 $70 million) exceeded the limitation
imposed by these guidelines and, as disallowed deferred
tax assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1
capital. According to regulatory capital guidelines, the
deferred tax assets that are dependent upon future taxable
income are limited for inclusion in Tier 1 capital to the lesser
of: (i) the amount of such deferred tax asset that the
entity expects to realize within one year of the calendar
quarter end-date, based on its projected future taxable income
for that year or (ii) 10% of the amount of the
entitys Tier 1 capital. Approximately $4 million
of the Corporations other net deferred tax liability at
December 31, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $0)
represented primarily the deferred tax effects of unrealized
gains and losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to
deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to
limitation under the guidelines. |
On February 1, 2010, the Corporation reported that it is
planning to conduct an exchange offer under which it will be
offering to exchange newly issued shares of common stock for the
issued and outstanding shares of publicly held Series A
through E Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred
Stock, subject to any necessary proration. The exchange offer
will be conducted to improve its capital structure given the
current economic conditions in the markets in which it operates
and the evolving regulatory environment. Through the exchange
offer, First BanCorp seeks to improve its tangible and
Tier 1 common equity ratios. The Corporation expects to
file a registration statement for the exchange offer shortly
after the filing of this
Form 10-K
for fiscal year 2009. Completion of the exchange offer will be
subject to certain conditions, including the consent by common
stockholders of the issuance of shares of the common stock
pursuant to the exchange.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in
financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance
sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that
are different than the full contract or notional amount of the
transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet
the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the
Corporations credit, market or liquidity risks,
(3) diversify the Corporations funding sources and
(4) optimize capital.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely
enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the
financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments
may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit.
These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and
approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the
statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2009,
commitments to extend credit and commercial and financial
standby letters of credit amounted to approximately
$1.5 billion and $103.9 million, respectively.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers
as long as the conditions established in the contract are met.
Generally, the Corporations mortgage banking activities do
not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its
prospective borrowers.
116
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the
Corporations contractual obligations and commitments,
which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations,
operating leases, commitments to sell mortgage loans and
commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit(1)
|
|
$
|
9,212,283
|
|
|
$
|
6,041,065
|
|
|
$
|
2,835,562
|
|
|
$
|
321,850
|
|
|
$
|
13,806
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
676,631
|
|
|
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
445,000
|
|
|
|
208,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
27,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
63,795
|
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
|
|
14,362
|
|
|
|
8,878
|
|
|
|
30,213
|
|
Other contractual obligations
|
|
|
10,387
|
|
|
|
7,157
|
|
|
|
3,130
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
14,500,612
|
|
|
$
|
7,960,195
|
|
|
$
|
4,911,810
|
|
|
$
|
1,339,268
|
|
|
$
|
289,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
13,158
|
|
|
$
|
13,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
$
|
103,904
|
|
|
$
|
103,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit
|
|
$
|
1,220,317
|
|
|
$
|
1,220,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
48,944
|
|
|
|
48,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans
|
|
|
255,598
|
|
|
|
255,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$
|
1,524,859
|
|
|
$
|
1,524,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $7.6 billion of brokered CDs sold by third-party
intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC
insurance limits and $25.6 million in CDARS. |
The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future
payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, and
under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and
to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to
lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any
condition established in the contract. Other contractual
obligations result mainly from contracts for the rental and
maintenance of equipment. Since certain commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount
does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For
most of the commercial lines of credit, the Corporation has the
option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional
disbursements. There have been no significant or unexpected
draws on existing commitments. The funding needs of customers
have not significantly changed as a result of the latest market
disruptions. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of
credit, the Corporation can at any time and without cause cancel
the unused credit facility.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate
swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed
to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation,
which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate
swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate
swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties
under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the
unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009
under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured
counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This
exposure was
117
reversed in the third quarter of 2008. The Corporation had
pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to
guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event
payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged
securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009 amounted to
approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as
collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate
given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a
performance guarantee under the swap agreements, was not part of
a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never
transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate
swap agreements, Lehmans obligation was to return the
collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc.,
acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a
custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided
instructions to have most of the securities transferred to
Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal
to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month
of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays Capital
in federal court in New York demanding the return of the
securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons
to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are
no assurances that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation
against Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial
portion of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim
filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities
Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation
can provide no assurances that it will be successful in
recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through
these proceedings. An estimated loss was not accrued as the
Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim
resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a
substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value.
If additional negative relevant facts become available in future
periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this
claim may arise. Considering that the investment securities have
not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts
in this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such
investments as non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
Interest
Rate Risk Management
First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to
limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest
income and to maintain stability in the profitability under
varying interest rate environments. The MIALCO oversees interest
rate risk and focuses on, among other things, current and
expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and
prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity,
securities market values, recent or proposed changes to the
investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and related
costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as
swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be
pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions
in light of the Corporations overall growth strategies and
objectives.
The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a consolidated net
interest income simulation analysis to estimate the potential
change in future earnings from projected changes in interest
rates. These simulations are carried out over a
one-to-five-year
time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward interest rate
movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a
twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1) using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had it
on the simulation date, and
(2) using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent patterns
and current strategies.
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and
liabilities detailed by maturity or re-pricing structure and
their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates
rise or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future
lending rates, current and expected future funding sources and
costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment
rates, deposits decay and other factors which may be important
in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
118
The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future
movements in the Corporations balance sheet and income
statement. The starting point of the projections generally
corresponds to the actual values on the balance sheet on the
date of the simulations.
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying
assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of
the Corporation over the period in question. It is highly
unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in all
cases. For this reason, the results of these simulations are
only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest
income to changes in market interest rates.
The following table presents the results of the simulations as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Consistent with prior years,
these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value of derivatives
and liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Risk
|
|
Net Interest Income Risk
|
|
|
(Projected for the Next 12 Months)
|
|
(Projected for the Next 12 Months)
|
|
|
Static Simulation
|
|
Growing Balance Sheet
|
|
Static Simulation
|
|
Growing Balance Sheet
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
+200 bps ramp
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
−200 bps ramp
|
|
$
|
(31.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.53
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(33.0
|
)
|
|
|
(6.98
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.77
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3.15
|
)%
|
During the past year, the Corporation continued managing its
balance sheet structure to control the overall interest rate
risk. As part of the strategy, the Corporation reduced long-term
fixed-rate and callable investment securities and increased
shorter-duration investment securities. During 2009, MBS
prepayments accelerated significantly as a result of the low
interest rate environment. Approximately $1.7 billion of
Agency MBS were sold during 2009, and $945 million of US
Agency debentures were called during 2009. Partial proceeds from
these sales and calls, in conjunction with prepayments on
mortgage backed securities were re-invested in instruments with
shorter durations such as
15-Years US
Agency MBS, US Agency callable debentures with contractual
maturities ranging from two to three years, and US Agency
floating rate collateral mortgage obligations. In addition,
during 2009, the Corporation continued adjusting the mix of its
funding sources to better match the expected average life of the
assets.
Taking into consideration the above-mentioned facts for modeling
purposes, the net interest income for the next twelve months
under a growing balance sheet scenario is estimated to increase
by $16.0 million in a gradual parallel upward move of
200 basis points.
Following the Corporations risk management policies,
modeling of the downward parallel rates moves by
anchoring the short end of the curve, (falling rates with a
flattening curve) was performed, even though, given the current
level of rates as of December 31, 2009, some market
interest rates were projected to be zero. Under this scenario,
where a considerable spread compression is projected, net
interest income for the next twelve months in a growing balance
sheet scenario is estimated to decrease by $33.0 million.
The Corporation used the gap analysis tool to evaluate the
potential effect of rate shocks on net interest income over the
selected time-periods. The gap report as of December 31,
2009 showed a positive cumulative gap for 3 month of
$2.3 billion and a positive cumulative gap of
$254.8 million for 1 year, compared to positive
cumulative gaps of $2.1 billion and $1.4 billion for
3 months and 1 year, respectively, as of
December 31, 2008. Gap management is a dynamic process,
through which the Corporation makes constant adjustments to
maintain sound and prudent interest rate risk exposures.
Derivatives. First BanCorp uses derivative
instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to
interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond
managements control.
The following summarizes major strategies, including derivative
activities, used by the Corporation in managing interest rate
risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest
rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a
reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The
value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The
Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for
protection against rising interest rates.
119
Specifically, the interest rate on certain private label
mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the
Corporations commercial loans to other financial
institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the
weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or
referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual
servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap
agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and
floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange
of the underlying notional principal amount. As of
December 31, 2009, most of the interest rate swaps
outstanding are used for protection against rising interest
rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher
since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs
(liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a
variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in
variable rate loans. All outstanding interest rate swaps related
to brokered CDs were called during 2009, in the face of lower
interest rate levels, and as a consequence the Corporation
exercised its call option on the
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs.
Structured repurchase agreements The
Corporation uses structured repurchase agreements, with embedded
call options, to reduce the Corporations exposure to
interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of
its liabilities, while keeping funding costs low. Another type
of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchased
agreements with embedded cap corridors; these instruments also
provide protection for a rising rate scenario.
For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative
activities (e.g. notional amounts), location and fair values of
derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition
and the amount of gains and losses reported in the Statement of
(Loss) Income, refer to Note 32 in the Corporations
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
The following tables summarize the fair value changes of the
Corporations derivatives as well as the source of the fair
values:
Fair
Value Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of year
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
Fair value of new contracts at inception
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Contracts terminated or called during the year
|
|
|
(5,198
|
)
|
Changes in fair value during the year
|
|
|
5,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source
of Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
In Excess
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
of 5 Years
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing from observable market inputs
|
|
$
|
(461
|
)
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(636
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,730
|
)
|
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(461
|
)
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(636
|
)
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject
to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the
market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of
the financial markets expectations regarding the future
direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values
are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the
most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level
of interest rates.
120
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, all of the derivative
instruments held by the Corporation were considered economic
undesignated hedges.
During 2009, all of the $1.1 billion of interest rate swaps
that economically hedge brokered CDs that were outstanding as of
December 31, 2008 were called by the counterparties, mainly
due to lower levels of
3-month
LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps,
the Corporation exercised its call option on the approximately
$1.1 billion
swapped-to-
floating brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net loss of
$3.5 million as a result of these transactions resulting
from the reversal of the cumulative
mark-to-market
valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
Refer to Note 29 of the Corporations financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for additional information regarding the fair value
determination of derivative instruments.
The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The
market risk of derivatives stems principally from the potential
for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on
changes in interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises
from the potential of default from the counterparty. To manage
this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of
good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements
whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral.
Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that
provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same
counterparty in the event of default. Currently the Corporation
is mostly engaged in derivative instruments with counterparties
with a credit rating of single A or better. All of the
Corporations interest rate swaps are supported by
securities collateral agreements, which allow the delivery of
securities to and from the counterparties depending on the fair
value of the instruments, to minimize credit risk.
Set forth below is a detailed analysis of the Corporations
credit exposure by counterparty with respect to derivative
instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at
|
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest Receivable
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Rating(1)
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair Value(2)
|
|
|
Fair Values
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Payable)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan
|
|
A+
|
|
$
|
67,345
|
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
|
|
A+
|
|
|
49,311
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
A
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
A
|
|
|
109,712
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,883
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
(5,068
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives(3)
|
|
|
|
|
284,619
|
|
|
|
4,518
|
|
|
|
(1,399
|
)
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
517,502
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
$
|
(6,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
|
$
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at
|
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest Receivable
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Rating(1)
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair Value(2)
|
|
|
Fair Values
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Payable)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia
|
|
AA−
|
|
$
|
16,570
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
Merrill Lynch
|
|
A
|
|
|
230,190
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
|
|
A+
|
|
|
14,384
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
JP Morgan
|
|
A+
|
|
|
531,886
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
(5,726
|
)
|
|
|
(3,407
|
)
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
|
|
A+
|
|
|
151,884
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(1,461
|
)
|
|
|
(1,283
|
)
|
|
|
512
|
|
Citigroup
|
|
A+
|
|
|
295,130
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
A
|
|
|
16,165
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
A
|
|
|
107,450
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363,659
|
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
|
|
(7,188
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
4,303
|
|
Other derivatives(3)
|
|
|
|
|
332,634
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,293
|
|
|
$
|
8,010
|
|
|
$
|
(8,505
|
)
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings. |
|
(2) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with
positive fair value excluding the related accrued interest
receivable/payable. |
|
(3) |
|
Credit exposure with several Puerto Rico counterparties for
which a credit rating is not readily available. Approximately
$4.2 million and $0.8 million of the credit exposure
with local companies relates to caps referenced to mortgages
bought from R&G Premier Bank as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. |
A Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach is used to
value the option components of derivative instruments. The
discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar
LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the
industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty
and/or the
Corporation. Although most of the derivative instruments are
fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those
that are not secured in full. The cumulative
mark-to-market
effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments
resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately
$0.5 million as of December 31, 2009, of which an
unrealized loss of $1.9 million was recorded in 2009, an
unrealized gain of $1.5 million was recorded in 2008 and an
unrealized gain of $0.9 million was recorded in 2007. The
Corporation compares the valuations obtained with valuations
received from counterparties, as an internal control procedure.
Credit
Risk Management
First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to
its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance sheet
instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans
receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for
investment and, therefore, First BanCorp is at risk for the term
of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend
credit, subject to specific condition, for specific amounts and
maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to
credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval
process as for loans. Refer to Contractual Obligations and
Commitments above for further details. The credit risk of
derivatives arises from the potential of the counterpartys
default on its contractual obligations. To manage this credit
risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit
standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever
possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. For further
details and information on the Corporations derivative
credit risk exposure, refer to Interest Rate Risk
Management section above. The Corporation manages its
credit risk through fundamental portfolio risk management
principles including credit policy, underwriting, independent
loan review and quality control
122
procedures, comprehensive financial analysis, and established
management committees. The Corporation also employs proactive
collection and loss mitigation efforts. Furthermore, there are
structured loan workout functions responsible for avoiding
defaults and minimizing losses upon default for each region and
for each business segment. The group utilizes relationship
officers, collection specialists and attorneys. In the case of
residential construction projects, the workout function monitors
project specifics, such as project management and marketing, as
deemed necessary.
The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities
portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are
principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and
U.S. Treasury and agency securities. Thus, a substantial
portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a guarantee
of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or backed by the full
faith and credit of the U.S. government and is deemed to be
of the highest credit quality.
Management, comprised of the Corporations Chief Credit
Risk Officer, Chief Lending Officer and other senior executives,
has the primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve
the Corporations credit risk goals and objectives. Those
goals and objectives are documented in the Corporations
Credit Policy.
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents the estimate
of the level of reserves appropriate to absorb inherent credit
losses. The amount of the allowance was determined by judgments
regarding the quality of each individual loan portfolio. All
known relevant internal and external factors that affected loan
collectibility were considered, including analyses of historical
charge-off experience, migration patterns, changes in economic
conditions, and changes in loan collateral values. For example,
factors affecting the Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), US Virgin
Islands or British Virgin Islands economies may
contribute to delinquencies and defaults above the
Corporations historical loan and lease losses. Such
factors are subject to regular review and may change to reflect
updated performance trends and expectations, particularly in
times of severe stress such as was experienced throughout 2009.
We believe the process for determining the allowance considers
all of the potential factors that could result in credit losses.
However, the process includes judgmental and quantitative
elements that may be subject to significant change. There is no
certainty that the allowance will be adequate over time to cover
credit losses in the portfolio because of continued adverse
changes in the economy, market conditions, or events adversely
affecting specific customers, industries or markets. To the
extent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, the credit
quality of our customer base materially decreases and the risk
profile of a market, industry, or group of customers changes
materially, or if the allowance is determined to not be
adequate, additional provision for credit losses could be
required, which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, liquidity, capital, and results of operations in
future periods. Refer to Critical Accounting
Policies Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
section above for additional information about the methodology
used by the Corporation to determine specific reserves and the
general valuation allowance.
Substantially all of the Corporations loan portfolio is
located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether
the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. British
Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland (mainly in the state of
Florida), the performance of the Corporations loan
portfolio and the value of the collateral supporting the
transactions are dependent upon the performance of and
conditions within each specific area real estate market. Recent
economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto
Rico indicate that the real estate market is experiencing
readjustments in value driven by the deteriorated purchasing
power of consumers and general economic conditions. The
Corporation sets adequate
loan-to-value
ratios upon original approval following the regulatory and
credit policy standards. The real estate market for the
U.S. Virgin islands remains fairly stable. In the Florida
market, residential real estate has experienced a very slow
turnaround.
As shown in the following table below, the allowance for loan
and lease losses increased to $528.1 million at
December 31, 2009, compared with $281.5 million at
December 31, 2008. Expressed as a percent of period-end
total loans receivable, the ratio increased to 3.79% at
December 31, 2009, compared with 2.15% at
123
December 31, 2008. The $246.6 million increase in the
allowance primarily reflected an increase in specific reserves
associated with impaired loans, an increase associated with
risk-grade migration and an increase in non-performing loans,
predominantly in the commercial and construction portfolio. The
increase is also a result of updating the loss rates factors
used to determine the general reserve to account for the
increase in net charge-offs, non-performing loans and the
stressed economic environment. Refer to the Provision for
Loan and Lease Losses discussion above for additional
information.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in
the allowance for loan and lease losses during the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
$
|
190,168
|
|
|
$
|
158,296
|
|
|
$
|
147,999
|
|
|
$
|
141,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (recovery) for loan and lease losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
45,010
|
|
|
|
13,032
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
71,401
|
|
|
|
7,740
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
146,157
|
|
|
|
35,561
|
|
|
|
18,369
|
|
|
|
(1,662
|
)
|
|
|
(5,774
|
)
|
Construction
|
|
|
264,246
|
|
|
|
53,109
|
|
|
|
23,502
|
|
|
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
7,546
|
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
53,044
|
|
|
|
81,506
|
|
|
|
74,677
|
|
|
|
62,881
|
|
|
|
44,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
74,991
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
(28,934
|
)
|
|
|
(6,256
|
)
|
|
|
(985
|
)
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
(945
|
)
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
(25,871
|
)
|
|
|
(3,664
|
)
|
|
|
(1,333
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
(35,696
|
)
|
|
|
(25,911
|
)
|
|
|
(9,927
|
)
|
|
|
(6,017
|
)
|
|
|
(8,290
|
)
|
Construction
|
|
|
(183,800
|
)
|
|
|
(7,933
|
)
|
|
|
(3,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
(70,121
|
)
|
|
|
(73,308
|
)
|
|
|
(78,675
|
)
|
|
|
(70,176
|
)
|
|
|
(42,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344,422
|
)
|
|
|
(117,072
|
)
|
|
|
(94,830
|
)
|
|
|
(77,209
|
)
|
|
|
(51,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
9,030
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
9,007
|
|
|
|
5,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,158
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
6,092
|
|
|
|
12,515
|
|
|
|
6,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(333,264
|
)
|
|
|
(108,321
|
)
|
|
|
(88,738
|
)
|
|
|
(64,694
|
)
|
|
|
(45,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of year
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
$
|
190,168
|
|
|
$
|
158,296
|
|
|
$
|
147,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to year end total loans
receivable
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during
the period
|
|
|
1.74
|
x
|
|
|
1.76
|
x
|
|
|
1.36
|
x
|
|
|
1.16
|
x
|
|
|
1.12
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2008, carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to
the $218 million auto loan portfolio acquired from Chrysler. |
124
For 2005, allowance for loan losses from the acquisition of
FirstBank Florida.
The following table sets forth information concerning the
allocation of the Corporations allowance for loan and
lease losses by loan category and the percentage of loan
balances in each category to the total of such loans as of the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,016
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,240
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,409
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
63,972
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
13,699
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
13,706
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9,827
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
164,128
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
83,482
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
38,108
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
18,438
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
12,623
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial loans (including loans to local
financial institutions)
|
|
|
186,007
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
74,358
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
63,030
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
53,929
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
58,117
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Consumer loans and finance leases
|
|
|
82,848
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
90,895
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
67,091
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
65,735
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
64,023
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
190,168
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
158,296
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
147,999
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information concerning the
composition of the Corporations allowance for loan and
lease losses as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 by loan
category and by whether the allowance and related provisions
were calculated individually or through a general valuation
allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
C&I Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
$
|
384,285
|
|
|
$
|
62,920
|
|
|
$
|
48,943
|
|
|
$
|
100,028
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
596,176
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
|
60,040
|
|
|
|
159,284
|
|
|
|
243,123
|
|
|
|
597,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,088
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
30,945
|
|
|
|
62,491
|
|
|
|
86,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,145
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
19.43
|
%
|
|
|
25.70
|
%
|
|
|
14.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
17.18
|
%
|
Loans with general allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
|
3,151,183
|
|
|
|
1,368,617
|
|
|
|
5,059,363
|
|
|
|
794,920
|
|
|
|
1,898,104
|
|
|
|
12,272,187
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
28,549
|
|
|
|
33,027
|
|
|
|
123,516
|
|
|
|
78,035
|
|
|
|
82,848
|
|
|
|
345,975
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
2.41
|
%
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
9.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
2.82
|
%
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
$
|
3,595,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,590,821
|
|
|
$
|
5,351,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,492,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,898,104
|
|
|
$
|
13,928,451
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
63,972
|
|
|
|
186,007
|
|
|
|
164,128
|
|
|
|
82,848
|
|
|
|
528,120
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
11.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
C&I Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
$
|
19,909
|
|
|
$
|
18,359
|
|
|
$
|
55,238
|
|
|
$
|
22,809
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
116,315
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,323
|
|
|
|
79,760
|
|
|
|
257,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,914
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,680
|
|
|
|
18,343
|
|
|
|
56,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,353
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
18.34
|
%
|
|
|
23.00
|
%
|
|
|
21.85
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
21.65
|
%
|
Loans with general allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
|
3,461,416
|
|
|
|
1,470,076
|
|
|
|
4,290,450
|
|
|
|
1,246,355
|
|
|
|
2,108,363
|
|
|
|
12,576,660
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
15,016
|
|
|
|
9,095
|
|
|
|
56,015
|
|
|
|
27,152
|
|
|
|
90,895
|
|
|
|
198,173
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
$
|
3,481,325
|
|
|
$
|
1,535,758
|
|
|
$
|
4,425,448
|
|
|
$
|
1,526,995
|
|
|
$
|
2,108,363
|
|
|
$
|
13,077,889
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
15,016
|
|
|
|
17,775
|
|
|
|
74,358
|
|
|
|
83,482
|
|
|
|
90,895
|
|
|
|
281,526
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
5.47
|
%
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and
related specific reserve during 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
501,229
|
|
Loans determined impaired during the year
|
|
|
1,466,805
|
|
Net charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
(244,154
|
)
|
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $49.6 million(2)
|
|
|
(39,374
|
)
|
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments
|
|
|
(28,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,656,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately $114.2 million, or 47%, is related to
construction loans in Florida and $44.6 million, or 18%, is
related to construction loans in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Related to five construction projects sold in Florida. |
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
56,330
|
|
|
$
|
18,343
|
|
|
$
|
8,680
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,353
|
|
Provision for impaired loans
|
|
|
211,658
|
|
|
|
69,401
|
|
|
|
43,583
|
|
|
|
18,304
|
|
|
|
342,946
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(181,895
|
)
|
|
|
(25,253
|
)
|
|
|
(21,318
|
)
|
|
|
(15,688
|
)
|
|
|
(244,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans, end of period
|
|
$
|
86,093
|
|
|
$
|
62,491
|
|
|
$
|
30,945
|
|
|
$
|
2,616
|
|
|
$
|
182,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Quality
We believe the most meaningful way to assess overall credit
quality performance for 2009 is through an analysis of credit
quality performance ratios. This approach forms the basis of
most of the discussion in the two sections immediately
following: Non-accruing and Non-performing assets and Net
Charge-Offs and Total Credit Losses.
Credit quality performance in 2009 was negatively impacted by
the sustained economic weakness in Puerto Rico and the United
States and the significant deterioration of the real estate
market in Florida, although there were positive signs late in
the year. In addition, we initiated certain actions in 2009 to
reduce non-performing credits, including note sales and
restructuring of loans into two separate agreement (loan
splitting). We anticipate a challenging year in 2010 with
regards to credit quality.
Non-accruing
and Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets consist of non-accruing loans,
foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties as well
as non-performing investment securities. Non-accruing loans are
those loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued.
When a loan is placed in non-accruing status, any interest
previously recognized and not collected is reversed and charged
against interest income.
Non-accruing
Loans Policy
Residential Real Estate Loans The Corporation
classifies real estate loans in non-accruing status when
interest and principal have not been received for a period of
90 days or more.
Commercial and Construction Loans The
Corporation places commercial loans (including commercial real
estate and construction loans) in non-accruing status when
interest and principal have not been received for a period of
90 days or more or when there are doubts about the
potential to collect all of the principal based on collateral
deficiencies or, in other situations, when collection of all of
principal or interest is not expected due to deterioration in
the financial condition of the borrower. Cash payments received
on certain loans that are impaired and collateral dependent are
recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loans. The principal portion of the payment is used
to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the
interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected).
However, when management believes that the ultimate
collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is
applied to principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is
diversified as to individual borrowers and industries among
other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real
estate collateral.
Finance Leases Finance leases are classified
in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been
received for a period of 90 days or more.
Consumer Loans Consumer loans are classified
in non-accruing status when interest and principal have not been
received for a period of 90 days or more.
127
Other
Real Estate Owned (OREO)
OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of
cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value less estimated
costs to sell off the real estate at the date of acquisition
(estimated realizable value).
Other
Repossessed Property
The other repossessed property category includes repossessed
boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed
boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated
fair value.
Investment
Securities
This category presents investment securities reclassified to
non-accruing status, at their book value.
Past
Due Loans
Past due loans are accruing loans which are contractually
delinquent 90 days or more. Past due loans are either
current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of
principal or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and
VA programs.
During the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loan
loss mitigation program providing homeownership preservation
assistance. Loans modified through this program are reported as
non-performing loans and interest is recognized on a cash basis.
When there is reasonable assurance of repayment and the borrower
has made payments over a sustained period, the loan is returned
to accruing status.
The following table presents non-performing assets as of the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
441,642
|
|
|
$
|
274,923
|
|
|
$
|
209,077
|
|
|
$
|
114,828
|
|
|
$
|
54,777
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
196,535
|
|
|
|
85,943
|
|
|
|
46,672
|
|
|
|
38,078
|
|
|
|
15,273
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
241,316
|
|
|
|
58,358
|
|
|
|
26,773
|
|
|
|
24,900
|
|
|
|
18,582
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
634,329
|
|
|
|
116,290
|
|
|
|
75,494
|
|
|
|
19,735
|
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
5,207
|
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
8,045
|
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
44,834
|
|
|
|
45,635
|
|
|
|
48,784
|
|
|
|
46,501
|
|
|
|
40,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,563,863
|
|
|
|
587,175
|
|
|
|
413,050
|
|
|
|
252,087
|
|
|
|
134,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
69,304
|
|
|
|
37,246
|
|
|
|
16,116
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
5,019
|
|
Other repossessed property
|
|
|
12,898
|
|
|
|
12,794
|
|
|
|
10,154
|
|
|
|
12,103
|
|
|
|
9,631
|
|
Investment securities(1)
|
|
|
64,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
1,710,608
|
|
|
$
|
637,215
|
|
|
$
|
439,320
|
|
|
$
|
267,060
|
|
|
$
|
148,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
165,936
|
|
|
$
|
471,364
|
|
|
$
|
75,456
|
|
|
$
|
31,645
|
|
|
$
|
27,501
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
8.71
|
%
|
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
$
|
190,168
|
|
|
$
|
158,296
|
|
|
$
|
147,999
|
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans
|
|
|
33.77
|
%
|
|
|
47.95
|
%
|
|
|
46.04
|
%
|
|
|
62.79
|
%
|
|
|
110.18
|
%
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans, excluding residential
real estate loans
|
|
|
47.06
|
%
|
|
|
90.16
|
%
|
|
|
93.23
|
%
|
|
|
115.33
|
%
|
|
|
186.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Collateral pledged with Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. |
128
Total non-performing assets as of December 31, 2009 was
$1.71 billion compared to $637.2 million as of
December 31, 2008. Even though deterioration in credit
quality was observed in all of the Corporations
portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and
commercial loan portfolios, which were affected by both the
stagnant housing market and further weakening in the economies
of the markets served during most of 2009. The increase in
non-performing assets was led by an increase of
$518.0 million in non-performing construction loans, of
which $314.1 million is related to the construction loan
portfolio in Puerto Rico portfolio and $205.2 million is
related to construction projects in Florida. Other portfolios
that experienced a significant growth in credit risk, mainly in
Puerto Rico, include: (i) a $183.0 million increase in
non-performing commercial and industrial (C&I)
loans, (ii) a $166.7 million increase in
non-performing residential mortgage loans, and (ii) a
$110.6 million increase in non-performing commercial
mortgage loans. Also, during 2009, the Corporation classified as
non-performing investment securities with a book value of
$64.5 million that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special
Financing, Inc., in connection with several interest rate swap
agreements entered into with that institution. Considering that
the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the
Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the Corporation
decided to classify such investments as non-performing. It is
important to note that although there was a significant increase
in non-performing assets from December 31, 2008, to
December 31,2009, there was a slower growth rate in the
2009 fourth quarter as compared to all previous quarters in 2009
as a result of actions taken by the Corporation including note
sales, restructuring of loans into two separate agreements (loan
splitting) and restructured loans restored to accrual status
after a sustained period of repayment and that have been deemed
collectible.
Total non-performing construction loans increased by
$518.0 million from December 31, 2008. The
non-performing
construction loans in Puerto Rico increased by
$314.1 million in 2009 primarily related to residential
housing projects. There were 10 relationships greater than
$10 million in non-accrual status as of December 31,
2009, compared to two as of December 31, 2008, including
$123.8 million on two high-rise residential projects.
Non-performing construction loans in Florida increased by
$205.2 million from December 31, 2008. There were five
relationships in the state of Florida greater than
$10 million totaling $186.8 million as of
December 31, 2009 compared to one relationship of
$11.1 million as of December 31, 2008. Most of the
non-performing loans in Florida are related to condo-conversion
and residential housing projects affected by low absorption
rates. Even though a significant increase was observed from 2008
to 2009, there was a decrease experienced in the last quarter of
2009 mainly due to note sales and loans restructured into two
notes. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation
completed the sales of non-performing construction loans in
Florida totaling approximately $40.4 million and also
completed the restructuring of condo-conversion loans with an
aggregate book value of $38.1 million.
Non-performing construction loans in the Virgin Islands
decreased by $1.3 million.
The C&I non-performing loans portfolio increased by
$183.0 million from December 31, 2008. Non-performing
C&I loans in Puerto Rico increased by $174.5 million,
reflecting the sustained economic weakness that affected several
industries such as food and beverage, accommodation, financial
and printing. There were four relationships greater than
$10 million as of December 31, 2009 totaling
$101.8 million that entered into non-accrual status during
2009 and accounted for 55% of the increase. C&I
non-performing loans in Florida and Virgin Islands were more
stable with increases of $2.2 million and
$6.2 million, respectively, from December 31, 2008.
Total non-performing commercial mortgage loans increased by
$110.6 million from December 31, 2008. Non-performing
commercial mortgage loans in Puerto Rico increased by
$66.5 million spread across several industries. In Florida,
non-performing commercial mortgage loans increased by
$33.8 million from December 31, 2008, including a
single rental-property relationship of $11.4 million.
Non-performing commercial mortgage loans in the Virgin Islands
increased by $10.3 million.
In many cases, commercial and construction loans were placed on
non-accrual status even though the loan was less than
90 days past due in their interest payments. At the close
of 2009, approximately $229.4 million of loans placed in
non-accrual status, mainly construction and commercial loans,
were current
129
or had delinquencies less than 90 days in their interest
payments. Further, collections are being recorded on a cash
basis through earnings, or on a cost-recovery basis, as
conditions warrant. In Florida, as sales of units within
condo-conversion projects continue to lag, some borrowers
reverted to rental projects. For several of these loans, cash
collections cover interest, property taxes, insurance and other
operating costs associated with the projects.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, interest income of
approximately $4.7 million related to $761.5 million
of non-performing loans, mainly non-performing construction and
commercial loans, was applied against the related principal
balances under the cost-recovery method. The Corporation will
continue to evaluate restructuring alternatives to mitigate
losses and enable borrowers to repay their loans under revised
terms in an effort to preserve the value of the
Corporations interests over the long-term.
Non-performing residential mortgage loans increased by
$166.7 million during 2009, mainly attributable to the
Puerto Rico portfolio, which has been adversely affected by the
continued trend of higher unemployment rates affecting consumers
and includes $36.9 million related to loans acquired in the
previously explained transaction with R&G. The
non-performing residential mortgage loan portfolio in Puerto
Rico increased by $131.2 million during 2009. The
Corporation continues to address loss mitigation and loan
modifications by offering alternatives to avoid foreclosures
through internal programs and programs sponsored by the Federal
Government. In Florida, non-performing residential mortgage
loans increased by $35.0 million from December 31,
2008, however, a decrease was observed in the last quarter due
to modified loans that have been restored to accrual status
after a sustained repayment performance (generally six months)
and are deemed collectible. During 2009, the non-performing
residential mortgage loan portfolio in the Virgin Islands
increased by $0.6 million.
The consumer and finance leases non-performing loan portfolio
remained relatively flat at $50.0 million as of
December 31, 2009 when compared to $51.7 million as of
December 31, 2008. This portfolio showed signs of stability
and benefited from changes in underwriting standards implemented
in late 2005. The consumer loan portfolio, with an average life
of approximately four years, has been replenished by new
originations under the revised standards.
The allowance to non-performing loans ratio as of
December 31, 2009 was 33.77%, compared to 47.95% as of
December 31, 2008. The decrease in the ratio is
attributable in part to non-performing collateral dependent
loans that are evaluated individually for impairment that, after
charge-offs, reflected limited impairment or no impairment at
all, and other impaired loans that did not require specific
reserves based on collateral values or cash flows projections
analyses performed. Also 17% of the increase in non-performing
loans since December 31, 2008 is related to residential
mortgage loans, mainly in Puerto Rico, where the
Corporations loan loss experience has been comparatively
low due to, among other things, the Corporations
conservative underwriting practices and
loan-to-value
ratios, thus requiring a lower general reserve as compared to
other portfolios.
130
As of December 31, 2009, approximately $517.7 million,
or 33%, of total non-performing loans have been charged-off to
their net realizable value as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
C&I Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
$
|
320,224
|
|
|
$
|
38,421
|
|
|
$
|
19,244
|
|
|
$
|
139,787
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
517,676
|
|
Other non-performing loans
|
|
|
121,418
|
|
|
|
158,114
|
|
|
|
222,072
|
|
|
|
494,542
|
|
|
|
50,041
|
|
|
|
1,046,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
441,642
|
|
|
$
|
196,535
|
|
|
$
|
241,316
|
|
|
$
|
634,329
|
|
|
$
|
50,041
|
|
|
$
|
1,563,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans
|
|
|
7.06
|
%
|
|
|
32.55
|
%
|
|
|
77.08
|
%
|
|
|
25.87
|
%
|
|
|
165.56
|
%
|
|
|
33.77
|
%
|
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding non-performing
loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
|
25.67
|
%
|
|
|
40.46
|
%
|
|
|
83.76
|
%
|
|
|
33.19
|
%
|
|
|
165.56
|
%
|
|
|
50.48
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
$
|
19,909
|
|
|
$
|
8,852
|
|
|
$
|
9,890
|
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,461
|
|
Other non-performing loans
|
|
|
255,014
|
|
|
|
77,091
|
|
|
|
48,468
|
|
|
|
114,480
|
|
|
|
51,661
|
|
|
|
546,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
274,923
|
|
|
$
|
85,943
|
|
|
$
|
58,358
|
|
|
$
|
116,290
|
|
|
$
|
51,661
|
|
|
$
|
587,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans
|
|
|
5.46
|
%
|
|
|
20.68
|
%
|
|
|
127.42
|
%
|
|
|
71.79
|
%
|
|
|
175.95
|
%
|
|
|
47.95
|
%
|
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding non-performing
loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
|
|
23.06
|
%
|
|
|
153.42
|
%
|
|
|
72.92
|
%
|
|
|
175.95
|
%
|
|
|
51.49
|
%
|
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance
to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto
Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government.
Due to the nature of the borrowers financial condition,
the restructure or loan modification through these program as
well as other restructurings of individual commercial,
commercial mortgage loans, construction loans and residential
mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR). A restructuring
of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or
legal reasons related to the debtors financial
difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more
of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and
provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the
refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and
escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and
modifications of the loan rate. As of December 31, 2009,
the Corporations TDR loans consisted of
$124.1 million of residential mortgage loans,
$42.1 million commercial and industrial loans,
$68.1 million commercial mortgage loans and
$101.7 million of construction loans. From the
$336.0 million total TDR loans, approximately
$130.4 million are in compliance with modified terms,
$23.8 million are
30-89 days
delinquent, and $181.8 million are classified as
non-accrual as of December 31, 2009.
Included in the $101.7 million of construction TDR loans
are certain impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into
two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter
of 2009. Each of these loans were restructured into two notes:
one that represents the portion of the loan that is expected to
be fully collected along with contractual interest and the
second note that represents the portion of the original loan
that was charged-off. The renegotiations of these loans have
been made after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity
to serve the debt and ability to perform under the modified
terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note
of each loan have been placed on a monthly payment that amortize
131
the debt over 25 years at a market rate of interest. An
interest rate reduction was granted for the second note. The
following tables provide additional information about the volume
of this type of loan restructurings and the effect on the
allowance for loan and lease losses in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Principal balance deemed collectible
|
|
$
|
22,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount charged-off
|
|
$
|
(29,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Specific Reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
14,375
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(29,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loans comprising the $22.4 million that have been
deemed collectible continue to be individually evaluated for
impairment purposes. These transactions contributed to a
$29.9 million decrease in non-performing loans during the
last quarter of 2009.
Past due and still accruing loans, which are contractually
delinquent 90 days or more, amounted to $165.9 million
as of December 31, 2009 (2008
$471.4 million) of which $71.1 million are government
guaranteed loans.
Net
Charge-Offs and Total Credit Losses
The Corporations net charge-offs for 2009 were
$333.3 million, or 2.48%, of average loans compared to
$108.3 million or 0.87% of average loans for 2008. The
significant increase is mainly due to the continued
deterioration in the collateral values of construction loans,
primarily in the Florida region. Floridas economy has been
hampered by a deteriorating housing market since the second half
of 2007. The overbuilding in the face of waning demand, among
other things, caused a decline in the housing prices. The
Corporation had been obtaining appraisals and increasing its
reserve, as necessary, with expectations for a gradual housing
market recovery. Nonetheless, the passage of time increased the
possibility that the recovery of the market will not be in the
near term. For these reasons, the Corporation decided to
charge-off during 2009 collateral deficiencies for a significant
amount of impaired collateral dependent loans based on current
appraisals obtained. The deficiencies in the collateral raised
doubts about the potential to collect the principal. The
Corporation is engaged in continuous efforts to identify
alternatives that enable borrowers to repay their loans and
protect the Corporations investment.
Total construction net charge-offs in 2009 were
$183.6 million, or 11.54% of average loans, up from
$7.7 million, or 0.52% of average loans in 2008.
Condo-conversion and residential development projects in Florida
represent a significant portion of the losses. There were
$137.4 million in net-charge offs in 2009 related to
construction projects in Florida. Approximately
$79.2 million of the charge-offs for 2009 was recorded in
connection with loans sold and loan split type of restructuring.
Net charge-offs of $46.2 million were recorded in
connection with the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico,
mainly residential housing projects. We continued our ongoing
portfolio management efforts, including obtaining updated
appraisals on properties and assessing a project status within
the context of market environment expectations.
Total commercial mortgage net charge-offs in 2009 were
$25.2 million, or 1.64% of average loans, up from
$3.7 million, or 0.27% of average loans in 2008. The
charge-offs in 2009 were spread through several loans,
distributed across our geographic markets. Commercial mortgage
net charge-offs for 2009 in Puerto Rico were $7.9 million,
in the United States $15.2 million and $2.1 million in
the Virgin Islands.
Total C&I net charge-offs in 2009 were $34.5 million,
or 0.72% of average loans, up from $24.2 million, or 0.59%
of average loans in 2008. C&I loans net charge-offs were
distributed across several industries,
132
principally in Puerto Rico. C&I net charge-offs for 2009 in
Puerto Rico were $32.8 million, in the United States
$0.6 million and $1.1 million in the Virgin Islands.
In assessing C&I net charge-offs trends, it is helpful to
understand the process of how these loans are treated as they
deteriorate over time. Reserves for loans are established at
origination consistent with the level of risk associated with
the original underwriting. If the quality of a commercial loan
deteriorates, it migrates to a lower quality risk rating as a
result of our normal portfolio management process, and a higher
reserve amount is assigned. As a part of our normal portfolio
management process, the loan is reviewed and reserves are
increased as warranted. Charge-offs, if necessary, are generally
recognized in a period after the reserves were established. If
the previously established reserves exceed that needed to
satisfactorily resolve the problem credit, a reduction in the
overall level of the reserve could be recognized. In summary, if
loan quality deteriorates, the typical credit sequence for
commercial loans are periods of reserve building, followed by
periods of higher net charge-offs as previously established
reserves are utilized. Additionally, it is helpful to understand
that increases in reserves either precede or are in conjunction
with increases in impaired commercial loans. When a credit is
classified as impaired, it is evaluated for specific reserves or
charged-off.
Residential mortgage net charge-offs were $28.9 million, or
0.82% of related average loans in 2009. This was up from
$6.3 million, or 0.19% of related average balances in 2008.
The higher loss level for 2009 was a result of negative trends
in delinquency levels. Approximately $15.7 million in
charge-offs for 2009 ($7.1 million in Puerto Rico and
$8.5 million in Florida) resulted from valuations, for
impairment purposes, of residential mortgage loan portfolios
with high delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels, compared to $1.8 million recorded in 2008. Total
residential mortgage loan portfolios evaluated for impairment
purposes and charged-off to their net realizable value amounted
to $320.2 million as of December 31, 2009. This amount
represents approximately 73% of the total non-performing
residential mortgage loan portfolio outstanding as of
December 31, 2009. Net charge-offs for residential mortgage
loans also includes $11.2 million related to loans
foreclosed during 2009, up from $3.9 million recorded for
loans foreclosed in 2008. Consistent with the Corporations
assessment of the value of properties, current and future market
conditions, management is executing strategies to accelerate the
sale of the real estate acquired in satisfaction of debt (REO).
The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans on the
Corporations residential mortgage loan portfolio of 0.82%
for 2009 is lower than the approximately 2.4% average charge-off
rate for commercial banks in the U.S. mainland for the
third quarter of 2009 as per statistical releases published by
the Federal Reserve on its website.
Net charge-offs of consumer loans and finance leases in 2009
were $61.1 million, or 3.05% of related average loans,
compared to net charge-offs of $66.4 million, or 3.19% of
related average loans for 2008. Performance of this portfolio on
both an absolute and relative basis continued to be consistent
with our views regarding the underlying quality of the
portfolio. The 2009 level of delinquencies has improved compared
with 2008 levels, further supporting our view of stable
performance going forward.
The following table presents charge-offs to average loans held
in portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
11.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.06
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
133
The following table presents net charge-offs to average loans
held in portfolio by geographic segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
PUERTO RICO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
VIRGIN ISLANDS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
6.73
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
FLORIDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
1.87
|
%
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
29.93
|
%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
7.33
|
%
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
11.70
|
%
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus losses on REO
operations) for 2009 amounted to $355.1 million, or 2.62%
to average loans and repossessed assets, respectively, in
contrast to credit losses of $129.7 million, or a loss rate
of 1.04%, for 2008. In addition, there was a $1.8 million
increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding
unfunded loan commitments.
134
The following table presents a detail of the REO inventory and
credit losses for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO balances, carrying value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
35,778
|
|
|
$
|
20,265
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
19,149
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
Condo-conversion projects
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
6,377
|
|
|
|
5,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
69,304
|
|
|
$
|
37,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO activity (number of properties):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning property inventory,
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Properties acquired
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Properties disposed
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending property inventory
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average holding period (in days)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Condo-conversion projects
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
REO operations (loss) gain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market adjustments and (losses) gain on sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
(9,613
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,521
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
(1,274
|
)
|
|
|
(1,402
|
)
|
Condo-conversion projects
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
(5,725
|
)
|
Construction
|
|
|
(1,977
|
)
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,364
|
)
|
|
|
(10,995
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other REO operations expenses
|
|
|
(7,499
|
)
|
|
|
(10,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss on REO operations
|
|
$
|
(21,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-OFFS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(28,861
|
)
|
|
|
(6,256
|
)
|
Commercial charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(59,712
|
)
|
|
|
(27,897
|
)
|
Construction charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(183,600
|
)
|
|
|
(7,735
|
)
|
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(61,091
|
)
|
|
|
(66,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(333,264
|
)
|
|
|
(108,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES(1)
|
|
$
|
(355,127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(129,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Commercial
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
11.65
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO(3)
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equal to REO operations (losses) gains plus Charge-offs, net. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments and gains
(losses) on sale of REO divided by average loans and repossessed
assets. |
135
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on REO operations
divided by average loans and repossessed assets. |
Operational
Risk
The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory
pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of
banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences
such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the
potential for operational and reputational loss has increased.
In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the
Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific
internal controls, policies and procedures that are
designated to identify and manage operational risk at
appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose of
these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the
Corporations business operations are functioning within
the policies and limits established by management.
The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major
categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all
business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment
group works with the various business units to ensure
consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect
to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business
recovery, legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized
groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security,
Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations.
These groups assist the lines of business in the development and
implementation of risk management practices specific to the
needs of the business groups.
Legal
and Compliance Risk
Legal and compliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance
with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of
adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk
that a counterpartys performance obligations will be
unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive
regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts
its business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been
significantly increasing over the last several years. The
Corporation has established and continues to enhance procedures
based on legal and regulatory requirements that are reasonably
designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance
Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is
responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and
implementation of an enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment
process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major
business areas with direct reporting relationships to the
Corporate Compliance Group.
Impact
of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data presented herein have
been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which require the
measurement of financial position and operating results in terms
of historical dollars without considering changes in the
relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the
assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary
in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on
a financial institutions performance than the effects of
general levels of inflation. Interest rate movements are not
necessarily correlated with changes in the prices of goods and
services.
Concentration
Risk
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically
concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. However,
the Corporation continues diversifying its geographical risk as
evidenced by its operations in the Virgin Islands and in Florida.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had
$1.2 billion outstanding of credit facilities granted to
the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. A substantial portion of these credit
facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment, such as sales and
property taxes collected by the central Government
and/or
municipalities. Another portion of these obligations
136
consist of loans to public corporations that obtain revenues
from rates charged for services or products, such as electric
power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the
good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality has been pledged to their repayment.
Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its
political subdivisions, the largest loan to one borrower as of
December 31, 2009 in the amount of $321.5 million is
with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial
Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. Of the
total gross loan portfolio of $13.9 billion as of
December 31, 2009, approximately 83% has credit risk
concentration in Puerto Rico, 9% in the United States and 8% in
the Virgin Islands.
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data
Financial data showing results of the 2009 and 2008 quarters is
presented below. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These
results are unaudited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
(Dollar in thousands, except for per share results)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
258,323
|
|
|
$
|
252,780
|
|
|
$
|
242,022
|
|
|
$
|
243,449
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
121,598
|
|
|
|
131,014
|
|
|
|
129,133
|
|
|
|
137,297
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
59,429
|
|
|
|
235,152
|
|
|
|
148,090
|
|
|
|
137,187
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
21,891
|
|
|
|
(78,658
|
)
|
|
|
(165,218
|
)
|
|
|
(53,202
|
)
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
(94,825
|
)
|
|
|
(174,689
|
)
|
|
|
(59,334
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share-basic
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per common share-diluted
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(1.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
(Dollar in thousands, except for per share results)
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
279,087
|
|
|
$
|
276,608
|
|
|
$
|
288,292
|
|
|
$
|
282,910
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
124,458
|
|
|
|
134,606
|
|
|
|
144,621
|
|
|
|
124,196
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
45,793
|
|
|
|
41,323
|
|
|
|
55,319
|
|
|
|
48,513
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
33,589
|
|
|
|
32,994
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
|
|
18,808
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
23,520
|
|
|
|
22,925
|
|
|
|
14,477
|
|
|
|
8,739
|
|
Earnings per common share-basic
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Earnings per common share-diluted
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Fourth
Quarter Financial Summary
The financial results for the fourth quarter of 2009, as
compared to the same period in 2008, were principally impacted
by the following items on a pre-tax basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income increased 11% to $137.3 million for the
fourth quarter of 2009 from $124.2 million for the fourth
quarter of 2008. Net interest income for the fourth quarter of
2009 includes a net unrealized gain of $2.5 million,
compared to a net unrealized loss of $5.3 million for the
fourth quarter of 2008, a positive fluctuation of
$7.8 million, related to the changes in valuation of
derivatives instruments that enonomically hedge the
Corporations brokered CDs and medium term notes and
unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair
value. Compared with the fourth quarter of 2008, net interest
income, excluding fair value adjustments on derivatives and
financial liabilities measured at fair value, increased
$5.3 million, or 4%. The Corporation benefited from lower
funding
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
costs related to continued low levels of interest rates and the
mix of financing sources. Lower interest rate levels was
reflected in the pricing of newly issued brokered CDs at rates
significantly lower than rate levels for prior years
fourth quarter. The average cost of brokered CDs decreased by
154 basis points from 4.06% for the fourth quarter of 2008
to 2.52% for the fourth quarter of 2009. Also, the Corporation
was able to reduce the average cost of its core deposits from
2.83% for prior years fourth quarter to 1.95% for the
fourth quarter of 2009. The decrease in funding costs was
partially offset by a significant increase in non-performing
loans and the repricing of floating-rate commercial and
construction loans at lower rates due to decreases in market
interest rates such as three-month LIBOR and the Prime rate,
even though the Corporation is actively increasing spreads on
loan renewals. The increase in net interest income was also
associated with an increase of $429.6 million of
interest-earning assets, over the prior years fourth
quarter. The increase in interest-earnings assets was driven by
a higher average loans volume, which increased by
$847 million, driven by additional credit facilities
extended to the Government of Puerto Rico. Partially offsetting
the increase in average loans was a decrease in average
investments of $417 million, driven mostly by the sales of
approximately $1.7 billion of Agency MBS and calls of
approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debt
securities that were more than purchases made during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income increased to $38.8 million for the
fourth quarter of 2009 from $19.4 million for prior
years fourth quarter. The variance is mainly related to a
realized gain of $24.4 million on the sale of
U.S. Agency MBS versus a realized gain on the sale of MBS
of $11.0 million in prior years fourth quarter. The
recent drop in mortgage pre-payments, as well as future
pre-payment estimates, could result in the extension of the MBS
portfolios average life, which in turn would shift the
balance sheets interest rate gap position. In an effort to
manage such risk, and take advantage of market opportunities,
approximately $460 million of U.S. Agency MBS ( mainly
30 Year fixed rate MBS with an aggregate weighted average
rate of 5.33%) were sold in the fourth quarter of 2009, compared
to approximately $284 million of U.S. Agency MBS sold
in the prior years fourth quarter. The realized gain on
the sale of MBS during the fourth quarter of 2008 was partially
offset by
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $4.8 million related to auto industry
corporate bonds and certain equity securities. There were no
other-than- temporary impairments charges during the fourth
quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan and lease losses amounted to
$137.3 million, or 170% of net charge-offs, for the fourth
quarter of 2009 compared to $48.5 million, or 172% of net
charge-offs, for the fourth quarter of 2008. The increase, as
compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, was mainly attributable
to the significant increase in non-performing loans, increases
in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction
loans, and the overall growth of the loan portfolio. Also, the
migration of loans to higher risk categories and increases to
loss factors used to determine the general reserve allowance
contributed to the higher provision. The increase in loss
factors was necessary to account for higher charge-offs and
delinquency levels as well as for worsening trends in economic
conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States.
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses increased 2% to $88.8 million from
$87.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2008. The increase
in the non-interest expense for the fourth quarter 2009, as
compared to prior years fourth quarter, was principally
attributable to an increase of $11.5 million in the FDIC
deposit insurance premium, which was partly related to increases
in regular assessment rates by the FDIC in 2009. The
aforementioned increase was partially offset by decreases in
certain expenses such as: (i) a $5.3 million decrease
in employees compensation and benefit expenses, due to a
lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive
compensation and overtime costs, and (ii) a
$4.5 million decrease in net loss on REO operations, mainly
due to lower write-downs and expenses in the U.S. mainland.
|
Some infrequent transactions that affected quarterly periods
shown in the above table include: (i) recognition of
non-cash charges of approximately $152.2 million to
increase the valuation allowance for the Corporations
deferred tax asset in the third quarter of 2009; (ii) the
ecording of $8.9 million in the second quarter of 2009 for
the accrual of the special assessment levied by the FDIC;
(iii) the impairment of the core deposit intangible of
FirstBank Florida for $4.0 million recorded in the first
quarter of 2009; (iv) the reversal of $10.8 million of
UTBs and related accrued interest of $3.5 million during
the second quarter of 2009 for
138
positions taken on income taxes returns due to the lapse of the
statute of limitations for the 2004 taxable year; (v) the
reversal of $2.9 million of UTBs, net of a payment made to
the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury, in connection with the
conclusion of an income tax audit related to the 2005, 2006,
2007 and 2008 taxable years; (vi) the reversal of
$10.6 million of UTBs during the second quarter of 2008 for
positions taken on income tax returns due to the lapse of the
statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year; (vii) the
gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of a
portion of the Corporations investment in VISA as part of
VISAs IPO in the first quarter of 2008 and (viii) the
income tax benefit of $5.4 million recorded in the first
quarter of 2008 in connection with an agreement entered into
with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury that established a
multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the
$74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007
to settle a securities class action suit.
Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Refer to Item 9A.
CEO
and CFO Certifications
First BanCorps Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
the certifications required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibit 31.1 and 31.2 to this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the certifications required by Section III(b)(4) of the
Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 as Exhibit 99.1 and
99.2 to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
In addition, in 2009, First BanCorps Chief Executive
Officer certified to the New York Stock Exchange that he was not
aware of any violation by the Corporation of the NYSE corporate
governance listing standards.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
The information required herein is incorporated by reference to
the information included under the sub caption Interest
Rate Risk Management in the Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
section in this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
The consolidated financial statements of First BanCorp, together
with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, First
BanCorps independent registered public accounting firm,
are included herein beginning on
page F-1
of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
First BanCorps management, under the supervision and with
the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of First
BanCorps disclosure controls and procedures as such term
is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered
by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of
December 31, 2009, the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures were effective and provide reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the
Corporation in reports that the Corporation files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and
forms and is accumulated and reported to the Corporations
management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
139
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our managements report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting is set forth in Item 8 and incorporated herein by
reference.
The effectiveness of the Corporations internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report as set forth
in Item 8.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes to the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting during our most recent quarter
ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Information with
Respect to Nominees for Director of First BanCorp and Executive
Officers of the Corporation, Corporate Governance
and Related Matters and Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance contained in
First BanCorps definitive Proxy Statement for use in
connection with its 2010 Annual Meeting of stockholders (the
Proxy Statement) to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of First
BanCorps 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation, Compensation
of Directors, Compensation Discussion and
Analysis, Compensation Committee Report and
Tabular Executive Compensation Disclosure in First
BanCorps Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section entitled Beneficial Ownership of
Securities in First BanCorps Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Certain Relationships
and Related Person Transactions and Corporate
Governance and Related Matters in First BanCorps
Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
Information in response to this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section entitled Audit Fees in
First BanCorps Proxy Statement.
140
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) List of documents filed as part of this report.
(1) Financial Statements.
The following consolidated financial statements of First
BanCorp, together with the report thereon of First
BanCorps independent registered public accounting firm,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, dated March 1, 2010, are
included herein beginning on
page F-1:
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income for Each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for each
of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
(2) Financial statement schedules.
All financial schedules have been omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is shown in the financial
statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits listed below are filed herewith as part of
this
Form 10-K
or are incorporated herein by reference.
Index to
Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-Laws of First BanCorp(1)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.125% non-cumulative
perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A(2)
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 8.35% non-cumulative
perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B(3)
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.40% non-cumulative
perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C(4)
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.25% non-cumulative
perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D(5)
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the 7.00% non-cumulative
perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E(6)
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
Certificate of Designation creating the fixed-rate cumulative
perpetual preferred stock, Series F(7)
|
|
4
|
.0
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate(9)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series A(2)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series B(3)
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series C(4)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series D(5)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series E(10)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series F(1)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Warrant dated January 16, 2009 to purchase shares of First
BanCorp(8)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated January 16, 2009, including
Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms
attached thereto as Exhibit A, between First BanCorp and
the United States Department of the Treasury(14)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
FirstBanks 1997 Stock Option Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
First BanCorps 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan(12)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Investment agreement between The Bank of Nova Scotia and First
BanCorp dated February 15, 2007, including the Form of
Stockholder Agreement(13)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Employment Agreement Aurelio Alemán(11)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement Aurelio
Alemán(15)
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement Aurelio
Alemán
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Employment Agreement Randolfo Rivera(11)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
Randolfo Rivera(15)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement
Randolfo Rivera
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Employment Agreement Lawrence Odell(16)
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
Lawrence Odell(16)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement
Lawrence Odell(15)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement
Lawrence Odell
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Employment Agreement Orlando Berges(17)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Service Agreement Martinez Odell & Calabria(16)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Service Agreement Martinez
Odell & Calabria(16)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Service Agreement Martinez
Odell & Calabria
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers(1)
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of First BanCorps subsidiaries
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the CEO
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of the CFO
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of the CEO
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of the CFO
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Section III(b)(4) of
the Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 and 31 CFR §
30.15
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Section III(b)(4) of
the Emergency Stabilization Act of 2008 and 31 CFR §
30.15
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Policy Statement and Standards of Conduct for Members of Board
of Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Shareholders(18)
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Independence Principles for Directors of First BanCorp(19)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed by the
Corporation on March 2, 2009. |
142
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to First BanCorps registration
statement on
Form S-3
filed by the Corporation on March 30, 1999. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to First BanCorps registration
statement on
Form S-3
filed by the Corporation on September 8, 2000. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to First BanCorps registration
statement on
Form S-3
filed by the Corporation on May 18, 2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to First BanCorps registration
statement on
Form S-3/A
filed by the Corporation on January 16, 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to
Form 8-A
filed by the Corporation on September 26, 2003. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 from the
Form 8-K
filed by the Corporation on January 20, 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 from the
Form 8-K
filed by the Corporation on January 20, 2009. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference from Registration statement on
Form S-4
filed by the Corporation on April 15, 1998. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 from the
Form 8-K
filed by the Corporation on September 5, 2003. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed by the
Corporation on March 26, 1999. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed by the
Corporation on May 12, 2008. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 from the
Form 8-K
filed by the Corporation on February 22, 2007. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the
Form 8-K
filed by the Corporation on January 20, 2009. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed by the
Corporation on May 11, 2009. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed by the
Corporation on February 9, 2007. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed by the
Corporation on August 11, 2009. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed by the
Corporation on March 15, 2004. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference from the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed by the
Corporation on February 29, 2008. |
143
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 the Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
FIRST BANCORP.
Aurelio Alemán
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: 3/1/10
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Aurelio
Alemán
Aurelio
Alemán
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Orlando
Berges
Orlando
Berges
|
|
CPA Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ José
Menéndez-Cortada
José
Menéndez-Cortada
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Fernando
Rodríguez-Amaro
Fernando
Rodríguez Amaro
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jorge
L. Díaz
Jorge
L. Díaz
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sharee
Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
Sharee
Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ José
L. Ferrer-Canals
José
L. Ferrer-Canals
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank
Kolodziej
Frank
Kolodziej
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Héctor
M. Nevares
Héctor
M. Nevares
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ José
F. Rodríguez
José
F. Rodríguez
|
|
Director
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Pedro
Romero
Pedro
Romero
|
|
CPA Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
Date: 3/1/10
|
144
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
|
|
F-1
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of First BanCorp:
The management of First BanCorp (the Corporation) is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for our assessment
of internal control over financial reporting. The
Corporations internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) and includes controls over the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the
Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies
(Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the requirements of
Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act (FDICIA).
Internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The management of First BanCorp has assessed the effectiveness
of the Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this
assessment, the Corporation used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.
Based on our assessment, management concluded that the
Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009.
The effectiveness of the Corporations internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears
herein.
Aurelio Alemán
President and Chief Executive Officer
Orlando Berges
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
F-2
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
254 Muñoz Rivera Avenue
BBVA Tower,
9th Floor
Hato Rey, PR 00918
Telephone
(787) 754-9090
Facsimile
(787) 766-1094
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of First BanCorp
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial condition and the related consolidated statements of
(loss) income, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in
stockholders equity and cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of First BanCorp and
its subsidiaries (the Corporation) at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Corporations management is responsible for these financial
statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions
on these financial statements and on the Corporations
internal control over financial reporting based on our
integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Corporation changed the manner in which it
accounts for uncertain tax positions and the manner in which it
accounts for the financial assets and liabilities at fair value
in 2007.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Managements
assessment and our audit of First BanCorps internal
control over financial reporting also included controls over the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with the
instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank
Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the
reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). A
companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized
F-3
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Juan, Puerto Rico
March 1, 2010
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (OF PUERTO RICO)
License No. 216 Expires Dec. 1, 2010
Stamp 2389662 of the P.R. Society of
Certified Public Accountants has been
affixed to the file copy of this report
F-4
FIRST
BANCORP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share information)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
679,798
|
|
|
$
|
329,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
54,469
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
22,546
|
|
|
|
20,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
76,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged
|
|
|
3,021,028
|
|
|
|
2,913,721
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
1,149,754
|
|
|
|
948,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
3,862,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged
|
|
|
400,925
|
|
|
|
968,389
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
200,694
|
|
|
|
738,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of
$621,584 (2008 $1,720,412)
|
|
|
601,619
|
|
|
|
1,706,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
64,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $528,120
(2008 $281,526)
|
|
|
13,400,331
|
|
|
|
12,796,363
|
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
|
10,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
|
12,806,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
197,965
|
|
|
|
178,468
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
69,304
|
|
|
|
37,246
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
|
|
|
79,867
|
|
|
|
98,565
|
|
Due from customers on acceptances
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
312,837
|
|
|
|
330,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
$
|
19,491,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
697,022
|
|
|
$
|
625,928
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits (including $0 and $1,150,959 measured
at fair value as of December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively)
|
|
|
11,972,025
|
|
|
|
12,431,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
13,057,430
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
3,421,042
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
1,060,440
|
|
Notes payable (including $13,361 and $10,141 measured at fair
value as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively)
|
|
|
27,117
|
|
|
|
23,274
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
231,914
|
|
Bank acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
145,237
|
|
|
|
148,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
18,029,385
|
|
|
|
17,943,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 28, 31 and 34)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and
outstanding 22,404,000 shares (2008 22,004,000)
at an aggregate liquidation value of $950,100 (2008
$550,100)
|
|
|
928,508
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized
250,000,000 shares; issued 102,440,522 (2008
102,444,549)
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
|
|
102,444
|
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding, 92,542,722 shares outstanding
(2008 92,546,749)
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,223
|
|
|
|
108,299
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
118,291
|
|
|
|
440,777
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of
$4,628 (2008 $717)
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
1,548,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
$
|
19,491,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-5
FIRST
BANCORP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
741,535
|
|
|
$
|
835,501
|
|
|
$
|
901,941
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
254,462
|
|
|
|
285,041
|
|
|
|
265,275
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
22,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
|
|
1,126,897
|
|
|
|
1,189,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
314,487
|
|
|
|
414,838
|
|
|
|
528,740
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
|
114,651
|
|
|
|
133,690
|
|
|
|
148,309
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
32,954
|
|
|
|
39,739
|
|
|
|
38,464
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings
|
|
|
13,109
|
|
|
|
10,506
|
|
|
|
22,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
599,016
|
|
|
|
738,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
527,881
|
|
|
|
451,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan and lease
losses
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
|
|
336,933
|
|
|
|
330,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service charges on loans
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
6,893
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
13,307
|
|
|
|
12,895
|
|
|
|
12,769
|
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
8,605
|
|
|
|
3,273
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
Net gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
86,804
|
|
|
|
27,180
|
|
|
|
3,184
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary
impairment losses
|
|
|
(33,400
|
)
|
|
|
(5,987
|
)
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities not
expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income)
|
|
|
31,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
|
|
(5,987
|
)
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a
secured commercial loan to a local financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,819
|
|
Insurance reimbursements and other agreements related to a
contingency settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
|
27,030
|
|
|
|
28,727
|
|
|
|
24,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
74,643
|
|
|
|
67,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits
|
|
|
132,734
|
|
|
|
141,853
|
|
|
|
140,363
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
62,335
|
|
|
|
61,818
|
|
|
|
58,894
|
|
Business promotion
|
|
|
14,158
|
|
|
|
17,565
|
|
|
|
18,029
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
15,217
|
|
|
|
15,809
|
|
|
|
20,751
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
15,847
|
|
|
|
16,989
|
|
|
|
15,364
|
|
Insurance and supervisory fees
|
|
|
45,605
|
|
|
|
15,990
|
|
|
|
12,616
|
|
Net loss on real estate owned (REO) operations
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
21,373
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
Other non-interest expenses
|
|
|
44,342
|
|
|
|
41,974
|
|
|
|
39,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
333,371
|
|
|
|
307,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(270,653
|
)
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
89,719
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
|
|
|
46,888
|
|
|
|
40,276
|
|
|
|
40,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
69,661
|
|
|
$
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-6
FIRST
BANCORP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
20,774
|
|
|
|
19,172
|
|
|
|
17,669
|
|
Amortization and impairment of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
7,386
|
|
|
|
3,603
|
|
|
|
3,294
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
16,054
|
|
|
|
(38,853
|
)
|
|
|
13,658
|
|
Stock-based compensation recognized
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
Gain on sale of investments, net
|
|
|
(86,804
|
)
|
|
|
(27,180
|
)
|
|
|
(3,184
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
5,987
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
Derivative instruments and hedging activities (gain) loss
|
|
|
(15,745
|
)
|
|
|
(26,425
|
)
|
|
|
6,134
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments
|
|
|
(7,352
|
)
|
|
|
(2,617
|
)
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a
secured commercial loan to a local financial institution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan
fees and costs
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(21,208
|
)
|
|
|
(6,194
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of broker placement fees
|
|
|
22,858
|
|
|
|
15,665
|
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
Accretion of basis adjustments on fair value hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
Net amortization (accretion) of premium and discounts on
investment securities
|
|
|
5,221
|
|
|
|
(7,828
|
)
|
|
|
(42,026
|
)
|
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
Decrease in accrued income tax payable
|
|
|
(19,408
|
)
|
|
|
(13,348
|
)
|
|
|
(3,419
|
)
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
18,699
|
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable
|
|
|
(24,194
|
)
|
|
|
(31,030
|
)
|
|
|
(13,808
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
28,609
|
|
|
|
(14,959
|
)
|
|
|
4,408
|
|
Decrease in other liabilities
|
|
|
(8,668
|
)
|
|
|
(9,501
|
)
|
|
|
(123,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
518,436
|
|
|
|
65,977
|
|
|
|
(7,843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
243,249
|
|
|
|
175,914
|
|
|
|
60,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on loans
|
|
|
3,010,435
|
|
|
|
2,588,979
|
|
|
|
3,084,530
|
|
Loans originated
|
|
|
(4,429,644
|
)
|
|
|
(3,796,234
|
)
|
|
|
(3,813,644
|
)
|
Purchase of loans
|
|
|
(190,431
|
)
|
|
|
(419,068
|
)
|
|
|
(270,499
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
|
|
|
43,816
|
|
|
|
154,068
|
|
|
|
150,707
|
|
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets
|
|
|
78,846
|
|
|
|
76,517
|
|
|
|
52,768
|
|
Purchase of servicing assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
(1,851
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
1,946,434
|
|
|
|
679,955
|
|
|
|
959,212
|
|
Purchases of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(8,460
|
)
|
|
|
(8,540
|
)
|
|
|
(511,274
|
)
|
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(2,781,394
|
)
|
|
|
(3,468,093
|
)
|
|
|
(576,100
|
)
|
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
1,110,245
|
|
|
|
1,586,799
|
|
|
|
623,374
|
|
Proceeds from principal repayments of securities available for
sale
|
|
|
880,384
|
|
|
|
332,419
|
|
|
|
214,218
|
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
(40,271
|
)
|
|
|
(32,830
|
)
|
|
|
(24,642
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale/redemption of other investment securities
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
9,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other equity securities
|
|
|
(5,785
|
)
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
(23,422
|
)
|
Net cash inflow on acquisition of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(381,793
|
)
|
|
|
(2,291,146
|
)
|
|
|
(136,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(393,636
|
)
|
|
|
1,924,312
|
|
|
|
59,499
|
|
Net increase in loans payable
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and
securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(344,411
|
)
|
|
|
326,396
|
|
|
|
(593,078
|
)
|
Net FHLB advances (paid) taken
|
|
|
(82,000
|
)
|
|
|
(42,560
|
)
|
|
|
543,000
|
|
Repayments of notes payable and other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,000
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(43,066
|
)
|
|
|
(66,181
|
)
|
|
|
(64,881
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,924
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock and associated warrant
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
436,895
|
|
|
|
2,142,020
|
|
|
|
(113,536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
298,351
|
|
|
|
26,788
|
|
|
|
(189,866
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
405,733
|
|
|
|
378,945
|
|
|
|
568,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
704,084
|
|
|
$
|
405,733
|
|
|
$
|
378,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
679,798
|
|
|
$
|
329,730
|
|
|
$
|
195,809
|
|
Money market instruments
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
76,003
|
|
|
|
183,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
704,084
|
|
|
$
|
405,733
|
|
|
$
|
378,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-7
FIRST
BANCORP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Preferred Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
550,100
|
|
|
$
|
550,100
|
|
|
$
|
550,100
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock Series F
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock discount Series F, net of
accretion
|
|
|
(21,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
928,508
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
92,546
|
|
|
|
92,504
|
|
|
|
83,254
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
Common stock issued under stock option plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock forfeited
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,546
|
|
|
|
92,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In-Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
108,299
|
|
|
|
108,279
|
|
|
|
22,757
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,674
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
|
|
|
25,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued under stock option plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation recognized
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock forfeited
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
134,223
|
|
|
|
108,299
|
|
|
|
108,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Surplus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
286,049
|
|
|
|
276,848
|
|
Transfer from retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,957
|
|
|
|
9,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
286,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
440,777
|
|
|
|
409,978
|
|
|
|
326,761
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
109,937
|
|
|
|
68,136
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
(12,966
|
)
|
|
|
(25,905
|
)
|
|
|
(24,605
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock
|
|
|
(30,106
|
)
|
|
|
(40,276
|
)
|
|
|
(40,276
|
)
|
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change adoption
of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,615
|
)
|
Cumulative adjustment for accounting change adoption
of fair value option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,778
|
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount Series F
|
|
|
(4,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to legal surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,957
|
)
|
|
|
(9,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
118,291
|
|
|
|
440,777
|
|
|
|
409,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
|
|
(25,264
|
)
|
|
|
(30,167
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(30,896
|
)
|
|
|
82,653
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
|
|
(25,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,548,117
|
|
|
$
|
1,421,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-8
FIRST
BANCORP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities on which an
other-than-temporary
impairment has been recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities not
expected to be sold
|
|
|
(31,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for
other-than-temporary
impairment on debt securities included in net income
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other unrealized holding gains arising during the period
|
|
|
85,871
|
|
|
|
95,316
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
Reclassification adjustments for net gain included in net income
|
|
|
(82,772
|
)
|
|
|
(17,706
|
)
|
|
|
(3,184
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments for
other-than-temporary
impairment on equity securities
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
5,987
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
(3,911
|
)
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income for the year, net of tax
|
|
|
(30,896
|
)
|
|
|
82,653
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(306,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
192,590
|
|
|
$
|
73,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-9
FIRST
BANCORP
|
|
Note 1
|
Nature of
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). The following is a
description of First BanCorps (First BanCorp
or the Corporation) most significant policies:
Nature
of business
First BanCorp is a publicly-owned, Puerto Rico-chartered
financial holding company that is subject to regulation,
supervision and examination by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. The Corporation is a full service
provider of financial services and products with operations in
Puerto Rico, the United States and the U.S. and British
Virgin Islands.
The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for
retail, commercial and institutional clients. As of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation controlled three
wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank Puerto Rico
(FirstBank or the Bank), FirstBank
Insurance Agency, Inc.(FirstBank Insurance Agency)
and Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a PR
Finance Group). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered
commercial bank, FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto
Rico-chartered insurance agency and PR Finance Group is a
domestic corporation. FirstBank is subject to the supervision,
examination and regulation of both the Office of the
Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico (OCIF) and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the FDIC). Deposits are insured through
the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund. FirstBank also operates in the
state of Florida, (USA), subject to regulation and examination
by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation and the FDIC, in
the U.S. Virgin Islands, subject to regulation and
examination by the United States Virgin Islands Banking Board,
and in the British Virgin Islands, subject to regulation by the
British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission.
FirstBank Insurance Agency is subject to the supervision,
examination and regulation by the Office of the Insurance
Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. PR Finance
Group is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation
of the OCIF.
FirstBank conducted its business through its main office located
in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking
branches in Puerto Rico, sixteen branches in the United States
Virgin Islands (USVI) and British Virgin Islands (BVI) and ten
branches in the state of Florida (USA). FirstBank had six
wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First
Leasing and Rental Corporation, a vehicle leasing company with
two offices in Puerto Rico; First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a
Money Express La Financiera), a finance company
specializing in the origination of small loans with twenty-seven
offices in Puerto Rico; First Mortgage, Inc. (First
Mortgage), a residential mortgage loan origination company
with thirty-eight offices in FirstBank branches and at stand
alone sites; First Management of Puerto Rico, a domestic
corporation; FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp, a
broker-dealer subsidiary created in March 2009 and engaged in
municipal bond underwriting and financial advisory services on
structured financings principally provided to government
entities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and FirstBank
Overseas Corporation, an international banking entity organized
under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico.
FirstBank had three subsidiaries with operations outside of
Puerto Rico: First Insurance Agency VI, Inc., an insurance
agency with three offices that sells insurance products in the
USVI; First Express, a finance company specializing in the
origination of small loans with three offices in the USVI; and
First Trade, Inc., which is inactive.
Principles
of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Corporation and its subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Statutory business trusts that are wholly-owned by the
Corporation and are issuers of trust preferred securities are
not consolidated in the Corporations consolidated
financial statements in accordance with
F-10
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) for consolidation of variable
interest entities.
Reclassifications
For purposes of comparability, certain prior period amounts have
been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.
Use of
estimates in the preparation of financial
statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Cash
and cash equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents
include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold
and short-term investments with original maturities of three
months or less.
Securities
purchased under agreements to resell
The Corporation purchases securities under agreements to resell
the same securities. The counterparty retains control over the
securities acquired. Accordingly, amounts advanced under these
agreements represent short-term loans and are reflected as
assets in the statements of financial condition. The Corporation
monitors the market value of the underlying securities as
compared to the related receivable, including accrued interest,
and requests additional collateral when deemed appropriate. As
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no securities
purchased under agreements to resell outstanding.
Investment
securities
The Corporation classifies its investments in debt and equity
securities into one of four categories:
Held-to-maturity
Securities which the entity has the intent and ability to hold
to maturity. These securities are carried at amortized cost. The
Corporation may not sell or transfer
held-to-maturity
securities without calling into question its intent to hold
other debt securities to maturity, unless a nonrecurring or
unusual event that could not have been reasonably anticipated
has occurred.
Trading Securities that are bought and held
principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term.
These securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses reported in earnings. As of December 31,
2009 and 2008, the Corporation did not hold investment
securities for trading purposes.
Available-for-sale
Securities not classified as
held-to-maturity
or trading. These securities are carried at fair value, with
unrealized holding gains and losses, net of deferred tax,
reported in other comprehensive income as a separate component
of stockholders equity and do not affect earnings until
realized or are deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired.
Other equity securities Equity securities
that do not have readily available fair values are classified as
other equity securities in the consolidated statements of
financial condition. These securities are stated at the lower of
cost or realizable value. This category is principally composed
of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) regulatory requirements. Their realizable
value equals their cost.
F-11
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Premiums and discounts on investment securities are amortized as
an adjustment to interest income on investments over the life of
the related securities under the interest method. Net realized
gains and losses and valuation adjustments considered
other-than-temporary,
if any, related to investment securities are determined using
the specific identification method and are reported in
non-interest income as net impairment losses on investment
securities. Purchases and sales of securities are recognized on
a trade-date basis.
Evaluation
of
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) on
held-to-maturity
and
available-for-sale
securities
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to
determine whether there have been any events or circumstances
indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered
OTTI. A security is considered impaired if the fair value is
less than its amortized cost basis.
The Corporation evaluates if the impairment is
other-than-temporary
depending upon whether the portfolio is of fixed income
securities or equity securities as further described below. The
Corporation employs a systematic methodology that considers all
available evidence in evaluating a potential impairment of its
investments.
The impairment analysis of fixed income securities places
special emphasis on the analysis of the cash position of the
issuer and its cash and capital generation capacity, which could
increase or diminish the issuers ability to repay its bond
obligations, the length of time and the extent to which the fair
value has been less than the amortized cost basis and changes in
the near-term prospects of the underlying collateral, if
applicable, such as changes in default rates, loss severity
given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions.
In light of current volatile economic and financial market
conditions, the Corporation also takes into consideration the
latest information available about the overall financial
condition of an issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and
government actions affecting the issuers industry and
actions taken by the issuer to deal with the present economic
climate. In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt
securities. OTTI losses are recognized in earnings if the
Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or it is
more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However,
even if the Corporation does not expect to sell a debt security,
expected cash flows to be received are evaluated to determine if
a credit loss has occurred. An unrealized loss is generally
deemed to be
other-than-temporary
and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the
expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis
of the debt security. The credit loss component of an OTTI is
recorded as a component of Net impairment losses on investment
securities in the statements of (loss) income, while the
remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of taxes. The previous amortized cost
basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings is the new amortized
cost basis of the investment. The new amortized cost basis is
not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. However,
for debt securities for which OTTI was recognized in earnings,
the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash
flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.
For further disclosures, refer to Note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Prior to April 1, 2009, an unrealized loss was considered
other-than-temporary
and recorded in earnings if (i) it was probable that the
holder would not collect all amounts due according to
contractual terms of the debt security, or (ii) the fair
value was below the amortized cost of the security for a
prolonged period of time and the Corporation did not have the
positive intent and ability to hold the security until recovery
or maturity.
The impairment model for equity securities was not affected by
the aforementioned FASB amendment. The impairment analysis of
equity securities is performed and reviewed on an ongoing basis
based on the latest financial information and any supporting
research report made by a major brokerage firm. This analysis is
very subjective and based, among other things, on relevant
financial data such as capitalization, cash flow, liquidity,
systematic risk, and debt outstanding of the issuer. Management
also considers the issuers industry trends, the historical
performance of the stock, credit ratings as well as the
Corporations intent to hold the
F-12
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
security for an extended period. If management believes there is
a low probability of recovering book value in a reasonable time
frame, then an impairment will be recorded by writing the
security down to market value. As previously mentioned, equity
securities are monitored on an ongoing basis but special
attention is given to those securities that have experienced a
decline in fair value for six months or more. An impairment
charge is generally recognized when the fair value of an equity
security has remained significantly below cost for a period of
twelve consecutive months or more.
Loans
Loans are stated at the principal outstanding balance, net of
unearned interest, unamortized deferred origination fees and
costs and unamortized premiums and discounts. Fees collected and
costs incurred in the origination of new loans are deferred and
amortized using the interest method or a method which
approximates the interest method over the term of the loan as an
adjustment to interest yield. Unearned interest on certain
personal, auto loans and finance leases is recognized as income
under a method which approximates the interest method. When a
loan is paid off or sold, any unamortized net deferred fee
(cost) is credited (charged) to income.
Loans on which the recognition of interest income has been
discontinued are designated as non-accruing. When loans are
placed on non-accruing status, any accrued but uncollected
interest income is reversed and charged against interest income.
Consumer, construction, commercial and mortgage loans are
classified as non-accruing when interest and principal have not
been received for a period of 90 days or more or when there
are doubts about the potential to collect all of the principal
based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when
collection of all of the principal or interest is not expected
due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower.
Interest income on non-accruing loans is recognized only to the
extent it is received in cash. However, where there is doubt
regarding the ultimate collectability of loan principal, all
cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value
of such loans (i.e., the cost recovery method). Loans are
restored to accrual status only when future payments of interest
and principal are reasonably assured.
Loan and lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to
the allowance for loan and lease losses. Closed-end personal
consumer loans are charged-off when payments are 120 days
in arrears. Collateralized auto and finance leases are reserved
at 120 days delinquent and charged-off to their estimated
net realizable value when collateral deficiency is deemed
uncollectible (i.e. when foreclosure is probable). Open-end
(revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when payments
are 180 days in arrears.
A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current
information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will
be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and
interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. The Corporation measures impairment individually for
those commercial and construction loans with a principal balance
of $1 million or more, including loans for which a
charge-off has been recorded based upon the fair value of the
underlying collateral, and also evaluates for impairment
purposes certain residential mortgage loans with high
delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized based on
the Corporations policy for recognizing interest on
accrual and non-accrual loans. Impaired loans also include loans
that have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as a
concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.
Troubled debt restructurings typically result from the
Corporations loss mitigation activities or programs
sponsored by the Federal Government and could include rate
reductions, principal forgiveness, forbearance and other actions
intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure
or repossession of collateral. Troubled debt restructurings are
generally reported as non-performing loans and restored to
accrual status when there is a reasonable assurance of repayment
and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period,
generally six months. However, a loan that has been formally
restructured as to be reasonably assured of repayment and of
performance according to its modified terms is not placed in
non-accruing status, provided the restructuring is
F-13
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
supported by a current, well documented credit evaluation of the
borrowers financial condition taking into consideration
sustained historical payment performance for a reasonable time
prior to the restructuring.
Loans
held for sale
Loans held for sale are stated at the
lower-of-cost-or-market.
The amount by which cost exceeds market value in the aggregate
portfolio of loans held for sale, if any, is accounted for as a
valuation allowance with changes therein included in the
determination of net income.
Allowance
for loan and lease losses
The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan and lease
losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses currently
inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan
and lease losses provides for probable losses that have been
identified with specific valuation allowances for individually
evaluated impaired loans and for probable losses believed to be
inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically
identified. Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business
loan at the time of approval and are subject to subsequent
periodic reviews by the Corporations senior management.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is reviewed on a
quarterly basis as part of the Corporations continued
evaluation of its asset quality.
A specific valuation allowance is established for those
commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired,
primarily when the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired
loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present
value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the
loans effective rate is lower than the carrying amount of
that loan. To compute the specific valuation allowance,
commercial and real estate, including residential mortgage loans
with a principal balance of $1 million or more are
evaluated individually as well as smaller residential mortgage
loans considered impaired based on their high delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels. When foreclosure is probable, the impairment is measured
based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the
collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated
appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that
loans are impaired and are updated annually thereafter. In
addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential
mortgage loans on a spot basis based on specific characteristics
such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and
loan-to-value
ratios. Deficiencies from the excess of the recorded investment
in collateral dependent loans over the resulting fair value of
the collateral are charged-off when deemed uncollectible.
For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans,
such as auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans,
residential mortgages, and commercial and construction loans not
considered impaired or in amounts under $1 million, the
Corporation maintains a general valuation allowance. The
methodology to compute the general valuation allowance has not
change in the past 2 years. The Corporation updates the
factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly
basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying
loss factors according to the loan type and assigned risk
category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired;
all doubtful loans are considered impaired). The general reserve
for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency
trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical
location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and
other environmental factors such as economic forecasts. The
analysis of the residential mortgage pools are performed at the
individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the
expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment
curves, default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the
pool. The severity is affected by the expected house price
scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are
used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The
risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and associated costs are
used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area in which
the property is located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or Virgin
Islands). For commercial loans, including construction loans,
the general reserve is based on historical loss ratios, trends
in non-accrual loans, loan type, risk-rating, geographical
location, changes in collateral values for collateral dependent
loans and gross product
F-14
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or unemployment data for the geographical region. The
methodology of accounting for all probable losses in loans not
individually measured for impairment purposes is made in
accordance with authoritative accounting guidance that requires
losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and
estimable.
Transfers
and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of
liabilities
After a transfer of financial assets that qualifies for sale
accounting, the Corporation derecognizes financial assets when
control has been surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when
extinguished.
The transfer of financial assets in which the Corporation
surrenders control over the assets is accounted for as a sale to
the extent that consideration other than beneficial interests is
received in exchange. The criteria that must be met to determine
that the control over transferred assets has been surrendered,
includes: (1) the assets must be isolated from creditors of
the transferor, (2) the transferee must obtain the right
(free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of
that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and
(3) the transferor cannot maintain effective control over
the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them
before their maturity. When the Corporation transfers financial
assets and the transfer fails any one of the above criteria, the
Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred
financial assets and the transaction is accounted for as a
secured borrowing.
Servicing
Assets
The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the rights to
service loans for others, whether those servicing assets are
originated or purchased. The Corporation is actively involved in
the securitization of pools of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed
mortgages for issuance of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Also,
certain conventional conforming-loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC
with servicing retained. When the Corporation securitizes or
sells mortgage loans, it allocates the cost of the mortgage
loans between the mortgage loan pool sold and the retained
interests, based on their relative fair values.
Servicing assets (MSRs) retained in a sale or
securitization arise from contractual agreements between the
Corporation and investors in mortgage securities and mortgage
loans. The value of MSRs is derived from the net positive cash
flows associated with the servicing contracts. Under these
contracts, the Corporation performs loan servicing functions in
exchange for fees and other remuneration. The servicing
functions typically include: collecting and remitting loan
payments, responding to borrower inquiries, accounting for
principal and interest, holding custodial funds for payment of
property taxes and insurance premiums, supervising foreclosures
and property dispositions, and generally administering the
loans. The servicing rights entitle the Corporation to annual
servicing fees based on the outstanding principal balance of the
mortgage loans and the contractual servicing rate. The servicing
fees are credited to income on a monthly basis when collected
and recorded as part of mortgage banking activities in the
consolidated statements of (loss) income. In addition, the
Corporation generally receives other remuneration consisting of
mortgagor-contracted fees such as late charges and prepayment
penalties, which are credited to income when collected.
Considerable judgment is required to determine the fair value of
the Corporations servicing assets. Unlike highly liquid
investments, the market value of servicing assets cannot be
readily determined because these assets are not actively traded
in securities markets. The initial carrying value of the
servicing assets is generally determined based on an allocation
of the carrying amount of the loans sold (adjusted for deferred
fees and costs related to loan origination activities) and the
retained interest (MSRs) based on their relative fair value. The
fair value of the MSRs is determined based on a combination of
market information on trading activity (MSR trades and broker
valuations), benchmarking of servicing assets (valuation
surveys) and cash flow modeling. The valuation of the
Corporations MSRs incorporates two sets of assumptions:
(1) market derived assumptions for discount rates,
servicing costs, escrow earnings rate, float earnings rate and
cost of funds and (2) market assumptions calibrated to the
Companys loan characteristics and portfolio behavior for
escrow balances, delinquencies and foreclosures, late fees,
prepayments and prepayment penalties.
F-15
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Once recorded, MSRs are periodically evaluated for impairment.
Impairment occurs when the current fair value of the MSRs is
less than its carrying value. If MSRs are impaired, the
impairment is recognized in current-period earnings and the
carrying value of the MSRs is adjusted through a valuation
allowance. If the value of the MSRs subsequently increases, the
recovery in value is recognized in current period earnings and
the carrying value of the MSRs is adjusted through a reduction
in the valuation allowance. For purposes of performing the MSR
impairment evaluation, the servicing portfolio is stratified on
the basis of certain risk characteristics such as region, terms
and coupons. An
other-than-temporary
impairment analysis is prepared to evaluate whether a loss in
the value of the MSRs, if any, is other than temporary or not.
When the recovery of the value is unlikely in the foreseeable
future, a write-down of the MSRs in the stratum to its estimated
recoverable value is charged to the valuation allowance.
The servicing assets are amortized over the estimated life of
the underlying loans based on an income forecast method as a
reduction of servicing income. The income forecast method of
amortization is based on projected cash flows. A particular
periodic amortization is calculated by applying to the carrying
amount of the MSRs the ratio of the cash flows projected for the
current period to total remaining net MSR forecasted cash flow.
Premises
and equipment
Premises and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful life of each type of asset.
Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed over the
terms of the leases (contractual term plus lease renewals that
are reasonably assured) or the estimated useful
lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Costs of
maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the life
of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Costs of
renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are sold
or disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation
are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected
in earnings.
The Corporation has operating lease agreements primarily
associated with the rental of premises to support the branch
network or for general office space. Certain of these
arrangements are non-cancelable and provide for rent escalation
and renewal options. Rent expense on non-cancelable operating
leases with scheduled rent increases is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
Other
real estate owned (OREO)
Other real estate owned, which consists of real estate acquired
in settlement of loans, is recorded at the lower of cost
(carrying value of the loan) or fair value minus estimated cost
to sell the real estate acquired. Subsequent to foreclosure,
gains or losses resulting from the sale of these properties and
losses recognized on the periodic reevaluations of these
properties are credited or charged to income. The cost of
maintaining and operating these properties is expensed as
incurred.
Goodwill
and other intangible assets
Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
are recorded at estimated fair value as of the date of
acquisition. After initial recognition, any resulting intangible
assets are accounted for as follows:
Goodwill
The Corporation evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there
may be an impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed
at the segment (or reporting unit) level. Goodwill
is assigned to reporting units at the date the goodwill is
initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to reporting
units, it no longer retains its association with a particular
F-16
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
acquisition, and all of the activities within a reporting unit,
whether acquired or internally generated, are available to
support the value of the goodwill. The Corporations
goodwill is mainly related to the acquisition of FirstBank
Florida in 2005. Effective July 1, 2009, the operations
conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate entity were merged
with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. The
first step (Step 1) involves a comparison of the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit (FirstBank Florida)
to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill
is not considered impaired. If the carrying value exceeds
estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential
impairment and the second step is performed to measure the
amount of the impairment.
The second step (Step 2) involves calculating an implied
fair value of the goodwill for each reporting unit for which the
first step indicated a potential impairment. The implied fair
value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the
calculation of the amount of goodwill in a business combination,
by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the
aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets,
liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting
unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the
implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of
goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment.
If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit
exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment
charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot
exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting
unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill.
Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not
permitted.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit and based on
the nature of the business and reporting units current and
expected financial performance, the Corporation uses a
combination of methods, including market price multiples of
comparable companies, as well as discounted cash flow analysis
(DCF). The Corporation evaluates the results
obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and
understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the
results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances.
The computations require management to make estimates and
assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these
evaluations include:
|
|
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on
nature of business, location and size;
|
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an
estimate of the cost of equity;
|
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and
|
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions.
|
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuation was
determined by calculating median price to book value and price
to tangible equity multiples of the comparable companies and
applied these multiples to the reporting unit to derive an
implied value of equity.
For purposes of the DCF analysis approach, the valuation is
based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections
used in the DCF analysis for the reporting unit are based on the
most recent (as of the valuation date). The growth assumptions
included in these projections are based on managements
expectations of the reporting units financial prospects as
well as particular plans for the entity (i.e. restructuring
plans). The cost of equity was estimated using the capital asset
pricing model (CAPM) using comparable companies, an equity risk
premium, the rate of return of a riskless asset, and
a size premium. The discount rate was estimated to be
14.0 percent. The resulting discount rate was analyzed in
terms of reasonability given current market conditions.
The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill
during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Step 1 evaluation of
goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one
level below the United States
F-17
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
business segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill.
The Step 1 fair value for the unit under both valuation
approaches (market and DCF) was below the carrying amount of its
equity book value as of the valuation date (December 31),
requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with
accounting standards, the Corporation performed a valuation of
all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any
recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the
fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation
subtracted from the units Step 1 fair value the determined
fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value
of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill
carrying value of $27 million, resulting in no goodwill
impairment. The analysis of results for Step 2 indicated that
the reduction in the fair value of the reporting unit was mainly
attributable to the deteriorated fair value of the loan
portfolios and not the fair value of the reporting unit as going
concern. The discount in the loan portfolios is mainly
attributable to market participants expected rates of
returns, which affected the market discount on the Florida
commercial mortgage and residential mortgage portfolios. The
fair value of the loan portfolio determined for the Florida
reporting unit represented a discount of 22.5%.
The reduction in the Florida unit Step 1 fair value was offset
by a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in
an implied fair value of goodwill that exceeded the recorded
book value of goodwill. If the Step 1 fair value of the Florida
unit declines further without a corresponding decrease in the
fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve
without a corresponding increase in the Step 1 fair value, the
Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment
charge. The Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist
management in the annual evaluation of the Florida unit goodwill
(including Step 1 and Step 2), including the valuation of loan
portfolios as of the December 31 valuation date. In reaching its
conclusion on impairment, management discussed with the valuator
the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the
relevant values for the goodwill and determined that they were
reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the
Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to
the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could
result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn,
negatively impact the Corporations results of operations
and the reporting unit where goodwill is recorded.
Goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2009 or 2008,
nor was any goodwill written-off due to impairment during 2009,
2008 and 2007.
Other
Intangibles
Definite life intangibles, mainly core deposits, are amortized
over their estimated life, generally on a straight-line basis,
and are reviewed periodically for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable.
As a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit
intangibles, there was an impairment charge of $4.0 million
recorded in 2009 related to core deposits of FirstBank Florida
attributable to decreases in the base of acquired core deposits.
The Corporation performed impairment tests for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and determined that no
impairment was needed to be recognized for those periods for
other intangible assets. For further disclosures, refer to
Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
The Corporation sells securities under agreements to repurchase
the same or similar securities. Generally, similar securities
are securities from the same issuer, with identical form and
type, similar maturity, identical contractual interest rates,
similar assets as collateral and the same aggregate unpaid
principal amount. The Corporation retains control over the
securities sold under these agreements. Accordingly, these
agreements are considered financing transactions and the
securities underlying the agreements remain in the asset
accounts.
F-18
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The counterparty to certain agreements may have the right to
repledge the collateral by contract or custom. Such assets are
presented separately in the statements of financial condition as
securities pledged to creditors that can be repledged.
Income
taxes
The Corporation uses the asset and liability method for the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Corporations financial statements or tax
returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
determined for differences between financial statement and tax
bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or
deductible amounts in the future. The computation is based on
enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not
to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is
given to evidence that can be objectively verified, including
both positive and negative evidence. The accounting for income
taxes authoritative guidance requires the consideration of all
sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax
asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary
differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing
temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in
carryback years and tax planning strategies. In estimating
taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the
appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account
statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and recognizes tax
benefits only when deemed probable. Refer to Note 27 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted
authoritative guidance issued by the FASB that prescribes a
comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax
uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be
taken on income tax returns. Under the authoritative accounting
guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured upon a
two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than
not to be sustained based solely on its technical merits in
order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as
the largest dollar amount of that position that is more likely
than not to be sustained upon settlement. The difference between
the benefit recognized in accordance with this model and the tax
benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an
Unrecognized Tax Benefit (UTB). The Corporation
classifies interest and penalties, if any, related to UTBs as
components of income tax expense. Refer to Note 27 for
required disclosures and further information.
Treasury
stock
The Corporation accounts for treasury stock at par value. Under
this method, the treasury stock account is increased by the par
value of each share of common stock reacquired. Any excess paid
per share over the par value is debited to additional paid-in
capital for the amount per share that was originally credited.
Any remaining excess is charged to retained earnings.
Stock-based
compensation
Between 1997 and 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan
(the 1997 stock option plan) covering eligible
employees. The Corporation accounted for stock options using the
modified prospective method. Under the modified
prospective method, compensation cost is recognized in the
financial statements for all share-based payments granted after
January 1, 2006. The 1997 stock option plan expired in the
first quarter of 2007; all outstanding awards grants under this
plan continue to be in full force and effect, subject to their
original terms. No awards for shares could be granted under the
1997 stock option plan as of its expiration.
On April 29, 2008, the Corporations stockholders
approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the
Omnibus Plan). The Omnibus Plan provides for
equity-based compensation incentives (the awards)
through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units,
F-19
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
performance shares, and other stock-based awards. On
December 1, 2008, the Corporation granted 36,
243 shares of restricted stock under the Omnibus Plan to
the Corporations independent directors. Shares of
restricted stock are measured based on the fair market values of
the underlying stock at the grant dates. The restrictions on
such restricted stock award will lapse ratably on an annual
basis over a three-year period.
Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the
Corporation to develop an estimate of the number of share-based
awards that will be forfeited due to employee or director
turnover. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a
significant effect on share-based compensation, as the effect of
adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in
the period in which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the
actual forfeiture rate is higher than the estimated forfeiture
rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated
forfeiture rate, which will result in a decrease to the expense
recognized in the financial statements. If the actual forfeiture
rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an
adjustment is made to decrease the estimated forfeiture rate,
which will result in an increase to the expense recognized in
the financial statements. When unvested options or shares of
restricted stock are forfeited, any compensation expense
previously recognized on the forfeited awards is reversed in the
period of the forfeiture. For additional information regarding
the Corporations equity-based compensation refer to
Note 22.
Comprehensive
income
Comprehensive income for First BanCorp includes net income and
the unrealized gain (loss) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of estimated tax effect.
Segment
Information
The Corporation reports financial and descriptive information
about its reportable segments (see Note 33). Operating
segments are components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly
by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in
assessing performance. The Corporations management
determined that the segregation that best fulfills the segment
definition described above is by lines of business for its
operations in Puerto Rico, the Corporations principal
market, and by geographic areas for its operations outside of
Puerto Rico. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the
Corporation has realigned its reporting segments to better
reflect how it views and manages its business. Two additional
operating segments were created to evaluate the operations
conducted by the Corporation, outside of Puerto Rico. Operations
conducted in the United States and in the Virgin Islands are now
individually evaluated as separate operating segments. This
realignment in the segment reporting essentially reflects the
effect of restructuring initiatives, including the merger of
FirstBank Florida operations with and into FirstBank, and will
allow the Corporation to better present the results from its
growth focus. Prior to 2009, the operating segments were driven
primarily by the Corporations legal entities. FirstBank
operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through its loan
production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in the
Corporations then four reportable segments (Commercial and
Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking;
Treasury and Investments) while the operations conducted by
FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a category named
Other. Refer to Note 33 for additional
information.
Derivative
financial instruments
As part of the Corporations overall interest rate risk
management, the Corporation utilizes derivative instruments,
including interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and options to
manage interest rate risk. All derivative instruments are
measured and recognized on the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition at their fair value. On the date the
derivative instrument contract is entered into, the Corporation
may designate the derivative as (1) a hedge of the fair
value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized
firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge
of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows
to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge) or (3) as a
standalone
F-20
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
derivative instrument, including economic hedges that the
Corporation has not formally documented as a fair value or cash
flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument
that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as
a fair-value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the
hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged
risk (including gains or losses on firm commitments), are
recorded in current-period earnings as interest income or
interest expense depending upon whether an asset or liability is
being hedged. Similarly, the changes in the fair value of
standalone derivative instruments or derivatives not qualifying
or designated for hedge accounting are reported in
current-period earnings as interest income or interest expense
depending upon whether an asset or liability is being
economically hedged. Changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument that is highly effective and that is designated and
qualifies as a cash-flow hedge, if any, are recorded in other
comprehensive income in the stockholders equity section of
the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition until
earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows (e.g.,
when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability
are recorded in earnings). As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered
economic undesignated hedges recorded at fair value with the
resulting gain or loss recognized in current period earnings.
Prior to entering into an accounting hedge transaction or
designating a hedge, the Corporation formally documents the
relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item,
as well as the risk management objective and strategy for
undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking
all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or
cash flow hedges, if any, to specific assets and liabilities on
the statements of financial condition or to specific firm
commitments or forecasted transactions along with a formal
assessment at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing
basis as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in
offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged
item. The Corporation discontinues hedge accounting
prospectively when it determines that the derivative is not
effective or will no longer be effective in offsetting changes
in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the
derivative expires, is sold, or terminated, or management
determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging
instrument is no longer appropriate. When a fair value hedge is
discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer
adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis
adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of
the asset or liability as a yield adjustment.
The Corporation occasionally purchases or originates financial
instruments that contain embedded derivatives. At inception of
the financial instrument, the Corporation assesses: (1) if
the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are
clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of
the financial instrument (host contract), (2) if the
financial instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative
and the host contract is measured at fair value with changes in
fair value reported in earnings, or (3) if a separate
instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would
not meet the definition of a derivative. If the embedded
derivative does not meet any of these conditions, it is
separated from the host contract and carried at fair value with
changes recorded in current period earnings as part of net
interest income. Information regarding derivative instruments is
included in Note 32 to the Corporations consolidated
financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation elected to early
adopt authoritative guidance issued by the FASB that allows
entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and
liabilities at fair value with any changes in fair value
reflected in earnings. The Corporation adopted the fair value
option for callable fixed-rate medium-term notes and callable
brokered certificates of deposit that were hedged with interest
rate swaps. One of the main considerations in the determination
to adopt the fair value option for these instruments was to
eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul
method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness
assessment, and manual procedures followed by the Corporation to
fulfill the requirements specified by authoritative guidance
issued by the FASB for derivative instruments designated as fair
value hedges.
F-21
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
With the Corporations elimination of the use of the
long-haul method in connection with the adoption of the fair
value option, the Corporation no longer amortizes or accretes
the basis adjustment for the financial liabilities elected to be
measured at fair value. The basis adjustment amortization or
accretion is the reversal of the basis differential between the
market value and book value recognized at the inception of fair
value hedge accounting as well as the change in value of the
hedged brokered CDs and medium-term notes recognized since the
implementation of the long-haul method. Since the time the
Corporation implemented the long-haul method, it had recognized
changes in the value of the hedged brokered CDs and medium-term
notes based on the expected call date of the instruments. The
adoption of the fair value option also required the recognition,
as part of the initial adoption adjustment to retained earnings,
of all of the unamortized placement fees that were paid to
broker counterparties upon the issuance of the elected brokered
CDs and medium-term notes. The Corporation previously amortized
those fees through earnings based on the expected call date of
the instruments. The option of using fair value accounting also
requires that the accrued interest be reported as part of the
fair value of the financial instruments elected to be measured
at fair value. Refer to Note 29 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
Valuation
of financial instruments
The measurement of fair value is fundamental to the
Corporations presentation of its financial condition and
results of operations. The Corporation holds fixed income and
equity securities, derivatives, investments and other financial
instruments at fair value. The Corporation holds its investments
and liabilities on the statement of financial condition mainly
to manage liquidity needs and interest rate risks. A substantial
part of these assets and liabilities is reflected at fair value
on the Corporations financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Corporation adopted
authoritative guidance issued by the FASB for fair value
measurements which defines fair value as the exchange price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability
(an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. This guidance also
establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of
inputs may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Valuations are observed from
unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities.
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for instruments measured at fair value:
Callable
Brokered CDs (Level 2 inputs)
The fair value of callable brokered CDs, which are included
within deposits and elected to be measured at fair value, is
determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full
term of the CDs. The valuation uses a Hull-White Interest
Rate Tree approach for the CDs with callable option
components, an industry-standard approach for valuing
instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes
that the embedded options are exercised economically. The fair
value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal
amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and
swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices and value the cancellation option in the deposits. The
fair value does not incorporate the
F-22
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
risk of nonperformance, since the callable brokered CDs are
participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and
insured by the FDIC. As of December 31, 2009, there were no
callable brokered CDs outstanding measured at fair value since
they were all called during 2009.
Medium-Term
Notes (Level 2 inputs)
The fair value of medium-term notes is determined using a
discounted cash flow analysis over the full term of the
borrowings. This valuation also uses the Hull-White
Interest Rate Tree approach to value the option components
of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options
are exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes
is computed using the notional amount outstanding. The discount
rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and
swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. For
the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the
difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve
that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation
as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to
maturity of the note and option.
Investment
Securities
The fair value of investment securities is the market value
based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices
for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable
market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades,
quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids offers and
reference data including market research operations. Observable
prices in the market already consider the risk of
nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available,
fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due
to the limited market activity of the instrument (Level 3),
as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed
securities held by the Corporation. Unlike U.S. agency
mortgage-backed securities, the fair value of these private
label securities cannot be readily determined because they are
not actively traded in securities markets. Significant inputs
used for fair value determination consist of specific
characteristics such as information used in the prepayment
model, which follows the amortizing schedule of the underlying
loans, which is an unobservable input.
Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by
fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in
the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to
3-month
LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a
model and represents the estimated net cash flows over the
projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a
discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads
over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a non-rated security
and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate,
default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The
Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage
collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to
collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan
term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate
adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with
prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available
prepayment model (ADCO). The variable cash flow of the security
is modeled using the
3-month
LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were driven by the
combination of default and loss severity estimates, taking into
account loan credit characteristics
(loan-to-value,
state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose,
documentation type,
debt-to-income
ratio, other) to provide an estimate of default and loss
severity. Refer to Note 4 for additional information.
Derivative
Instruments
The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on
observable market parameters and takes into consideration the
credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate,
except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate
swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts is included in the
valuation; and
F-23
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
on options and caps, only the sellers credit risk is
considered. The Hull-White Interest Rate Tree
approach is used to value the option components of derivative
instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed
using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that
account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the
counterparty
and/or the
Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for
protection against rising interest rates and, prior to
June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically
hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest
rate swaps, a credit component is not considered in the
valuation since the Corporation fully collateralizes with
investment securities any
mark-to-market
loss with the counterparty and, if there are market gains, the
counterparty must deliver collateral to the Corporation.
Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case
with derivative instruments named as reference caps,
are valued using models that consider unobservable market
parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to
hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label
mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount
of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the
United States. Significant inputs used for fair value
determination consist of specific characteristics such as
information used in the prepayment model which follows the
amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an
unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula,
which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The
Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for
valuing stock options except that the spot price of the
underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula
uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates,
volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option
value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg
L.P. (Bloomberg) every day and build zero coupon
curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount
factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is
the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at
the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at
the end of each period. The cash flow of caplet is then
discounted from each payment date.
Income
recognition Insurance agencies
business
Commission revenue is recognized as of the effective date of the
insurance policy or the date the customer is billed, whichever
is later. The Corporation also receives contingent commissions
from insurance companies as additional incentive for achieving
specified premium volume goals
and/or the
loss experience of the insurance placed by the Corporation.
Contingent commissions from insurance companies are recognized
when determinable, which is generally when such commissions are
received or when the Corporation receives data from the
insurance companies that allows the reasonable estimation of
these amounts. The Corporation maintains an allowance to cover
commissions that management estimates will be returned upon the
cancellation of a policy.
Advertising
costs
Advertising costs for all reporting periods are expensed as
incurred.
Earnings
per common share
Earnings per share-basic is calculated by dividing income
attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average
number of outstanding common shares. The computation of earnings
per share-diluted is similar to the computation of earnings per
share-basic except that the number of weighted average common
shares is increased to include the number of additional common
shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive common
shares had been issued. Potential common shares consist of
common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding
warrants using the treasury stock method. This method assumes
that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds
from the exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation
cost attributable to future services, are used to
F-24
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference
between the number of potential shares issued and the shares
purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of
shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding
warrants that result in lower potential shares issued than
shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not
included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since
their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings
per share.
Recently
issued accounting pronouncements
The FASB have issued the following accounting pronouncements and
guidance relevant to the Corporations operations:
In May 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on financial
guarantee insurance contracts requiring that an insurance
enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of
default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation.
This guidance also clarifies how the accounting and reporting by
insurance entities applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used
to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. FASB
authoritative guidance on the accounting for financial guarantee
insurance contracts is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all
interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some
disclosures about the insurance enterprises
risk-management activities which are effective since the first
interim period after the issuance of this guidance. The adoption
of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the
Corporations financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for
determining whether instruments granted in shared-based payment
transactions are participating securities. This guidance applies
to entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards
that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Furthermore,
awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the
entity if the employee forfeits the award are considered
participating securities. Accordingly, under this guidance
unvested share-based payment awards that are considered to be
participating securities must be included in the computation of
earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class
method as required by FASB guidance on earnings per share. FASB
guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share
based payment transactions are participating securities is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those years. The adoption of this Statement did not have
an impact on the Corporations financial statements since,
as of December 31, 2009, the outstanding unvested shares of
restricted stock do not contain rights to nonforfeitable
dividends.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the
accounting of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies. This
guidance amends the provisions related to the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination. The guidance carries forward the
requirement that acquired contingencies in a business
combination be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date
if fair value can be reasonably estimated during the allocation
period. Otherwise, entities would typically account for the
acquired contingencies based on a reasonable estimate in
accordance with FASB guidance on the accounting for
contingencies. This guidance is effective for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of
the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement did not
have an impact on the Corporations financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for
determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for
the asset or liability have significantly decreased and
identifying transactions that are not orderly. This guidance
relates to determining fair values when there is no active
market or where
F-25
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It
reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, that is, to
reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly
transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced transaction)
at the date of the financial statements under current market
conditions. Specifically, it reaffirms the need to use judgment
to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and
in determining fair values when markets have become inactive.
This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a prospective basis.
The adoption of this Statement did not impact the
Corporations fair value methodologies on its financial
assets and laibilities.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on
determining whether an impairment for investments in debt
securities is OTTI and requires an entity to recognize the
credit component of an OTTI of a debt security in earnings and
the noncredit component in other comprehensive income
(OCI) when the entity does not intend to sell the
security and it is more likely than not that the entity will not
be required to sell the security prior to recovery. This
guidance also requires expanded disclosures and became effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. In connection with this guidance, the
Corporation recorded $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 of OTTI charges through earnings that
represents the credit loss of
available-for-sale
private label mortgage-backed securities. This guidance does not
amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
an OTTI of equity securities. The expanded disclosures related
to this new guidance are included in Note 4
Investment Securities.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
disclosure about fair values of financial instruments, which
requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial
instruments, in both interim financial statements as well as
annual financial statements. This guidance became effective for
interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of the amended guidance expanded the Corporations
interim financial statement disclosures with regard to the fair
value of financial instruments.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on
subsequent events, which establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
are available to be issued. This guidance sets forth
(i) the period after the balance sheet date during which
management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements and (iii) the disclosures that an
entity should make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. This guidance is effective for
interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15,
2009. There are not any material subsequent event that would
require further disclosure.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
accounting for transfers of financial assets, which improves the
relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the
effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This
guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first
annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting
periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB
amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the
most significant changes and additions to this guidance includes
changes to the conditions for sales of a financial assets which
objective is to determine whether a transferor and its
consolidated affiliates included in the financial statements
have surrendered control over transferred financial assets or
third-party beneficial interests; and the addition of the
meaning of the term participating interest which
F-26
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an
entire financial asset. The Corporation is evaluating the impact
the adoption of the guidance will have on its financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
consolidation of variable interest, which improves financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities and addresses (i) the effects on certain
provisions of the amended guidance, as a result of the
elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in
the accounting for transfer of financial assets guidance and
(ii) constituent concerns about the application of certain
key provisions of the guidance, including those in which the
accounting and disclosures do not always provide timely and
useful information about an enterprises involvement in a
variable interest entity. This guidance is effective as of the
beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period, and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in
December 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance issued in
June 2009. Among the most significant changes and additions to
this guidance includes the replacement of the quantitative-based
risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting
entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying
which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of
a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the
entity. The Corporation is evaluating the impact, if any, the
adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (Codification) is the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities
laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
The Codification project does not change GAAP in any way shape
or form; it only reorganizes the existing pronouncements into
one single source of U.S. GAAP. This guidance is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as
described in this guidance. All other accounting literature not
included in the Codification is nonauthoritative. Following this
guidance, the FASB will not issue new guidance in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates
(ASUs). The FASB will not consider ASUs as
authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update
the Codification, provide background information about the
guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s)
in the Codification.
In August 2009, the FASB updated the Codification in connection
with the fair value measurement of liabilities to clarify that
in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for
the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is
required to measure fair value using one or more of the
following techniques:
1. A valuation technique that uses:
a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded
as an asset
b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar
liabilities when traded as assets
2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the
principles of fair value measurement. Two examples would be an
income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market
approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the
measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer
the identical liability or would receive to enter into the
identical liability.
F-27
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The update also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of
a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a
separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the
existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the
liability. The update also clarifies that both a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability at the measurement
date and the quoted price for the identical liability when
traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustment to the
quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair
value measurements. This update is effective for the first
reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after
issuance. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the
Corporations fair value methodologies on its financial
liabilities.
In September 2009, the FASB updated the Codification to reflect
SEC staff pronouncements on
earnings-per-share
calculations. According to the update, the SEC staff believes
that when a public company redeems preferred shares, the
difference between the fair value of the consideration
transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the
carrying amount on the balance sheet after issuance costs of the
preferred stock should be added to or subtracted from net income
before doing an earnings per share calculation. The SECs
staff also thinks it is not appropriate to aggregate preferred
shares with different dividend yields when trying to determine
whether the if-converted method is dilutive to the
earnings per-share calculation. As of December 31, 2009,
the Corporation has not been involved in a redemption or induced
conversion of preferred stock.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
guidance on accounting for distributions to shareholders with
components of stock and cash. This guidance clarifies that the
stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them
to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on
the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to
receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is
reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. The
new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending
on or after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a
retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not
impact the Corporations financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to fair
value measurements and require reporting entities to make new
disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value
measurements including significant transfers into and out of
Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and
information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a
gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value
measurements. The FASB also clarified existing fair-value
measurement disclosure guidance about the level of
disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. Entities will
be required to separately disclose significant transfers into
and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the
fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers.
Significance will be determined based on earnings and total
assets or total liabilities or, when changes in fair value are
recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity.
A reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its
policy for determining when transfers between levels are
recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize
transfers include: (i) actual date of the event or change
in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii) beginning of
the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting
period. Currently, entities are only required to disclose
activity in Level 3 measurements in the fair-value
hierarchy on a net basis. This guidance will require separate
disclosures for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of
assets. Entities will also have to disclose the reasons for the
activity and apply the same guidance on significance and
transfer policies required for transfers between Level 1
and 2 measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of
fair-value measurements by class instead of
major category. A class is generally a subset of
assets and liabilities within a financial statement line item
and is based on the specific nature and risks of the assets and
liabilities and their classification in the fair-value
hierarchy. When determining classes, reporting entities must
also consider the level of disaggregated information required by
other applicable GAAP. For fair-value measurements using
significant observable inputs (Level 2) or significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3), this guidance requires
F-28
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reporting entities to disclose the valuation technique and the
inputs used in determining fair value for each class of assets
and liabilities. If the valuation technique has changed in the
reporting period (e.g., from a market approach to an income
approach) or if an additional valuation technique is used,
entities are required to disclose the change and the reason for
making the change. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll
forward disclosures, the guidance is effective for annual and
interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009
(first quarter of 2010 for public companies with calendar
year-ends). The new disclosures about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity for
Level 3 fair-value measurements are effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2010 (first quarter of 2011 for public companies with calendar
year-ends). Early adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption
period, entities are not required to include disclosures for
previous comparative periods; however, they are required for
periods ending after initial adoption. The Corporation is
evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on
its financial statements.
|
|
Note 2
|
Restrictions
on Cash and Due from Banks
|
The Corporations bank subsidiary, FirstBank, is required
by law, as enforced by the OCIF, to maintain minimum average
weekly reserve balances to cover demand deposits. The amount of
those minimum average reserve balances for the week that covered
December 31, 2009 was $91.3 million (2008
$233.7 million). As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Bank complied with the requirement. Cash and due from banks as
well as other short-term, highly liquid securities are used to
cover the required average reserve balances.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and as required by the
Puerto Rico International Banking Law, the Corporation
maintained separately for two of its international banking
entities (IBEs), $600,000 in time deposits, which were
considered restricted assets equally split between the two IBEs.
|
|
Note 3
|
Money
Market Investments
|
Money market investments are composed of federal funds sold,
time deposits with other financial institutions and short-term
investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Money market investments as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Federal funds sold, interest 0.01% (2008 - 0.01%)
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
54,469
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions,
weighted-average interest rate 0.24% (2008-interest 1.05%)
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments, weighted-average interest rate of
0.18%
(2008-weighted-average
interest rate of 0.21%)
|
|
|
22,546
|
|
|
|
20,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
$
|
76,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, $0.95 million of the
Corporations money market investments was pledged as
collateral for interest rate swaps. As of December 31,
2008, none of the Corporations money market investments
were pledged.
F-29
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 4
|
Investment
Securities
|
Investment
Securities Available for Sale
The amortized cost, non-credit loss component of OTTI securities
recorded in OCI, gross unrealized gains and losses recorded in
OCI, approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and
contractual maturities of investment securities available for
sale as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
of OTTI
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Recorded in OCI
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield %
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield %
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored agencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
$
|
1,139,577
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,562
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,145,139
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
12,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
11,989
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
4,593
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
113,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
113,487
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
110,624
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
110,404
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
6,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
6,365
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
15,789
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
15,570
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
1,275,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,284
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,281,465
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
137,371
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
137,133
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
5.94
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
705,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,388
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
722,219
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
1,846,386
|
|
|
|
45,743
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,892,128
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,388
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
722,249
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
1,846,611
|
|
|
|
45,748
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,892,358
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
407,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
417,393
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
331,594
|
|
|
|
10,283
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
341,867
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,850
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
418,312
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
332,385
|
|
|
|
10,299
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
342,674
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
101,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
105,406
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
|
|
269,716
|
|
|
|
4,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,394
|
|
|
|
4.96
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
1,374,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,629
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
1,402,386
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
1,071,521
|
|
|
|
28,005
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,099,525
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,345
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
1,507,792
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
1,341,290
|
|
|
|
32,688
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,373,977
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
156,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
156,307
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
117,198
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
144,217
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
30,236
|
|
|
|
113,983
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,863,888
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
|
|
64,218
|
|
|
|
6,246
|
|
|
|
2,889,014
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
3,664,503
|
|
|
|
88,737
|
|
|
|
30,248
|
|
|
|
3,722,992
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
7.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
7.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (without contractual maturity)(1)
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
4,139,661
|
|
|
$
|
32,846
|
|
|
$
|
70,583
|
|
|
$
|
6,616
|
|
|
$
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
$
|
3,804,236
|
|
|
$
|
89,370
|
|
|
$
|
31,264
|
|
|
$
|
3,862,342
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents common shares of other financial institutions in
Puerto Rico. |
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on
contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities
of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments
and/or call
options. The weighted-average yield on investment securities
available for sale is
F-30
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to
changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on
securities available for sale and the non-credit loss component
of OTTI are presented as part of OCI.
The aggregate amortized cost and approximate market value of
investment securities available for sale as of December 31,
2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
12,016
|
|
|
$
|
11,989
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
1,252,908
|
|
|
|
1,258,728
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
109,581
|
|
|
|
113,483
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
2,764,729
|
|
|
|
2,786,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,139,234
|
|
|
|
4,170,479
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
4,139,661
|
|
|
$
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables show the Corporations
available-for-sale
investments fair value and gross unrealized losses,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. It also
includes debt securities for which an OTTI was recognized and
only the amount related to a credit loss was recognized in
earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
14,760
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
9,113
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
23,873
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities FHLMC
|
|
|
236,925
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,925
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
GNMA
|
|
|
72,178
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,178
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
FNMA
|
|
|
415,601
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,601
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA
|
|
|
105,075
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,075
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,105
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
|
|
84,105
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
844,629
|
|
|
$
|
6,569
|
|
|
$
|
93,218
|
|
|
$
|
32,893
|
|
|
$
|
937,847
|
|
|
$
|
39,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,288
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
|
$
|
13,288
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
GNMA
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
FNMA
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,685
|
|
|
|
30,236
|
|
|
|
113,685
|
|
|
|
30,236
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
126,994
|
|
|
$
|
31,107
|
|
|
$
|
128,644
|
|
|
$
|
31,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
Held to Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses,
approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual
maturities of investment securities held to maturity as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield %
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year
|
|
$
|
8,480
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,492
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
8,455
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,489
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
Obligations of other U.S. Government sponsored agencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945,061
|
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
949,614
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
18,584
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
19,055
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
|
17,924
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
18,307
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
4,995
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,072
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
5,145
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,180
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
32,059
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
32,619
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
976,585
|
|
|
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
981,590
|
|
|
|
5.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
5,015
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,093
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
8,338
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8,404
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
FNMA certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
7,567
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
533,593
|
|
|
|
19,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,141
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
|
686,948
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,175
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
24,181
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
|
25,226
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25,448
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
567,560
|
|
|
|
20,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,765
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
728,079
|
|
|
|
9,633
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
737,682
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
601,619
|
|
|
$
|
20,858
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
621,584
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
$
|
1,706,664
|
|
|
$
|
15,463
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
|
$
|
1,720,412
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on
contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities
of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to
F-32
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
prepayments
and/or call
options as was the case with approximately $945 million of
U.S. government agency debt securities called during 2009.
The aggregate amortized cost and approximate market value of
investment securities held to maturity as of December 31,
2009, by contractual maturity are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
8,480
|
|
|
$
|
8,492
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
9,786
|
|
|
|
9,964
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
552,177
|
|
|
|
572,196
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
31,176
|
|
|
|
30,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
601,619
|
|
|
$
|
621,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time the Corporation has securities held to
maturity with an original maturity of three months or less that
are considered cash and cash equivalents and classified as money
market investments in the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Corporation had no outstanding securities held to maturity that
were classified as cash and cash equivalents.
The following tables show the Corporations
held-to-maturity
investments fair value and gross unrealized losses,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored agencies
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,262
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
$
|
7,262
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
FNMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
6,825
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
|
$
|
20,263
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assessment
for OTTI
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to
determine whether there have been any events or economic
circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss
has suffered OTTI. A debt security is considered impaired if the
fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the
reporting date. The accounting literature requires the
Corporation to assess whether the unrealized loss is
other-than-temporary.
Prior to April 1, 2009, unrealized losses that were
determined to be temporary were recorded, net of tax, in other
comprehensive income for available for sale securities, whereas
unrealized losses related to
held-to-maturity
securities determined to be temporary were not recognized.
Regardless of whether the security was classified as available
for sale or held to maturity, unrealized losses that were
determined to be
other-than-temporary
were recorded through earnings. An unrealized loss was
considered
other-than-temporary
if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect
all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt
security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized
cost of the debt security for a prolonged period of time and the
Corporation did not have the positive intent and ability to hold
the security until recovery or maturity.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt
securities. Under the new guidance, OTTI losses must be
recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the
debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be
required to sell the debt security before recovery of its
amortized cost basis. However, even if an investor does not
expect to sell a debt security, it must evaluate expected cash
flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred.
Under the new guidance, an unrealized loss is generally deemed
to be
other-than-temporary
and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the
expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis
of the debt security. As a result of the Corporations
adoption of this new guidance, the credit loss component of an
OTTI is recorded as a component of Net impairment losses on
investment securities in the accompanying consolidated
statements of (loss) income, while the remaining portion of the
impairment loss is recognized in OCI, provided the Corporation
does not intend to sell the underlying debt security and it is
more likely than not that the Corporation will not
have to sell the debt security prior to recovery.
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies,
government-sponsored entities and the U.S. Treasury
accounted for more than 94% of the total
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
portfolio as of December 31, 2009 and no credit losses are
expected, given the explicit and implicit guarantees provided by
the U.S. federal government. The Corporations
assessment was concentrated mainly on private label MBS of
approximately $117 million for which the Corporation
evaluates credit losses on a quarterly basis. The Corporation
considered the following factors in determining whether a credit
loss exists and the period over which the debt security is
expected to recover:
|
|
|
|
|
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has
been less than the amortized cost basis.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral
of a security such as changes in default rates, loss severity
given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions;
|
|
|
|
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral
supporting the principal and interest payments of the debt
securities; and
|
|
|
|
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the
issuer, taking into consideration the latest information
available about the overall financial condition of the issuer,
credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions
affecting the issuers industry and actions taken by the
issuer to deal with the present economic climate.
|
F-34
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation
recorded OTTI losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Label MBS
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary
impairment losses
|
|
|
(33,012
|
)
|
Unrealized
other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized in OCI(1)
|
|
|
31,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings(2)
|
|
$
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the noncredit component impact of the OTTI on private
label MBS |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the credit component of the OTTI on private label MBS |
The following table summarizes the roll-forward of credit losses
on debt securities held by the Corporation for which a portion
of an OTTI is recognized in OCI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Credit losses at the beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions:
|
|
|
|
|
Credit losses related to debt securities for which an OTTI was
not previously recognized
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses on debt securities held for
which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in OCI
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, debt securities with OTTI, for
which a loss related to credit was recognized in earnings,
consisted entirely of private label MBS. Private label MBS are
mortgage pass-through certificates bought from
R&G Financial Corporation
(R&G Financial), a Puerto Rican financial
institution. During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation
received from R&G Financial a payment of
$4.2 million to eliminate the 10% recourse provision
contained in the private label MBS.
Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on
single-family residential properties in the United States and
the interest rate is variable, tied to
3-month
LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
underlying collateral. The underlying mortgages are fixed-rate
single family loans with original high FICO scores (over
700) and moderate original
loan-to-value
ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels.
Refer to Note 1 for detailed information about the
methodology used to determine the fair value of private label
MBS.
Based on the expected cash flows derived from the model, and
since the Corporation does not have the intention to sell the
securities and has sufficient capital and liquidity to hold
these securities until a recovery of the fair value occurs, only
the credit loss component was reflected in earnings. Significant
assumptions in the valuation of the private label MBS as of
December 31, 2009 were as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
15%
|
Prepayment rate
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
13.06% - 50.25%
|
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
0.22% - 10.56%
|
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Corporation recorded OTTI of approximately $0.4 million and
$1.8 million, respectively, on certain equity securities
held in its
available-for-sale
investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto
Rico. Also, OTTI of $4.2 million was recorded in 2008
F-35
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related to auto industry corporate bonds that were subsequently
sold in 2009. Management concluded that the declines in value of
the securities were
other-than-temporary;
as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to
the market value as of the date of the analysis and is reflected
in earnings as a realized loss.
Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale
during 2009 amounted to approximately $1.9 billion
(2008 $680.0 million). The following table
summarizes the realized gains and losses on sales of securities
available for sale for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
82,772
|
|
|
$
|
17,896
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized security gains
|
|
$
|
82,772
|
|
|
$
|
17,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table states the name of issuers, and the
aggregate amortized cost and market value of the securities of
such issuers (includes
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities), when the aggregate amortized cost of such
securities exceeds 10% of stockholders equity. This
information excludes securities of the U.S. and P.R.
Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the
U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies that are
payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing
authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered
securities of a single issuer and include debt and
mortgage-backed securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
FHLMC
|
|
$
|
1,350,291
|
|
|
$
|
1,369,535
|
|
|
$
|
1,862,939
|
|
|
$
|
1,908,024
|
|
GNMA
|
|
|
474,349
|
|
|
|
483,964
|
|
|
|
332,385
|
|
|
|
342,674
|
|
FNMA
|
|
|
2,629,187
|
|
|
|
2,684,065
|
|
|
|
2,978,102
|
|
|
|
3,025,549
|
|
|
|
Note 5
|
Other
Equity Securities
|
Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to
maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum is
calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages,
and an additional investment is required that is calculated as a
percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the
collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The
stock is capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock
and cash dividends may be received on FHLB stock.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had
investments in FHLB stock with a book value of
$68.4 million ($54 million FHLB-New York and
$14.4 million FHLB-Atlanta) and $62.6 million,
respectively. The net realizable value is a reasonable proxy for
the fair value of these instruments. Dividend income from FHLB
stock for 2009, 2008 and 2007 amounted to $3.1 million,
$3.7 million and $2.9 million, respectively.
The FHLB stocks owned by the Corporation are issued by the FHLB
of New York and by the FHLB of Atlanta. Both Banks are part of
the Federal Home Loan Bank System, a national wholesale banking
network of 12 regional, stockholder-owned congressionally
chartered banks. The Federal Home Loan Banks are all privately
capitalized and operated by their member stockholders. The
system is supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency,
which ensures that the Home Loan Banks operate in a financially
safe and sound manner, remain adequately capitalized and able to
raise funds in the capital markets, and carry out their housing
finance mission.
F-36
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
There is no secondary market for the FHLB stock and it does not
have a readily determinable fair value. The stock is a par
stock sold and redeemed at par. It can only be sold
to/from the FHLBs or a member institution. From an OTTI
analysis perspective, the relevant consideration for
determination is the ultimate recoverability of par value.
The economic conditions of late 2008 affected the FHLBs,
resulting in the recording of losses on private-label MBS
portfolios. In the midst of the mortgage market crisis the FHLB
of Atlanta temporarily suspended dividend payments on their
stock in the fourth quarter of 2008 and in the first quarter of
2009. In the second and third quarter of 2009, they were
re-instated. The FHLB of NY has not suspended payment of
dividends. Third and fourth quarter dividends were reduced, and
by the first quarter 2009 they were increased.
The financial situation has since shown signs of improvement,
and so have the financial results of the FHLBs. The FHLB
of Atlanta reported preliminary financial results with an 11.7%
year-over-year
increase in net income to $283.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, while the FHLB of NY announce a 120%
year-over-year
increase in net income to $570.8 million for the same
period. At December 31, 2009, both Banks met their
regulatory
capital-to-assets
ratios and liquidity requirements.
The FHLBs primary source of funding is debt obligations,
which continue to be rated Aaa and AAA by Moodys and
Standard and Poors respectively. The Corporation expects
to recover the par value of its investments in FHLB stocks in
its entirety, therefore no OTTI is deemed to be required.
The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a
readily available fair value. The carrying value of such
securities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$1.6 million. During 2009, the Corporation realized a gain
of $3.8 million on the sale of VISA Class A stock. As
of December 31, 2009 the Corporation still held 119,234
VISA Class C shares. Also, during the first quarter of
2008, the Corporation realized a one-time gain of
$9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of part of its
investment in VISA, Inc., which completed its initial public
offering (IPO) in March 2008.
F-37
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 6
|
Interest
and Dividend on Investments
|
A detail of interest on investments and FHLB dividend income
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
Exempt
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,986
|
|
|
|
17,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
22,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
30,854
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
Exempt
|
|
|
172,923
|
|
|
|
199,875
|
|
|
|
110,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,777
|
|
|
|
202,392
|
|
|
|
112,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR Government obligations, U.S. Treasury securities and U.S.
Government agencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exempt
|
|
|
44,510
|
|
|
|
74,667
|
|
|
|
148,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,204
|
|
|
|
78,324
|
|
|
|
148,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exempt
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities (including FHLB dividends):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
Exempt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividends on investments
|
|
$
|
255,039
|
|
|
$
|
291,396
|
|
|
$
|
287,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of interest and
dividend income on investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income on investment securities and money market
investments
|
|
$
|
248,563
|
|
|
$
|
291,732
|
|
|
$
|
287,990
|
|
Dividends on FHLB stock
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
|
|
3,710
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
Net interest settlement on interest rate caps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income excluding unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives
(economic hedges)
|
|
|
251,645
|
|
|
|
295,679
|
|
|
|
290,851
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives (economic hedges) from
interest rate caps
|
|
|
3,394
|
|
|
|
(4,283
|
)
|
|
|
(3,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income and dividends on investments
|
|
$
|
255,039
|
|
|
$
|
291,396
|
|
|
$
|
287,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 7
|
Loans
Receivable
|
The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages
|
|
$
|
3,595,508
|
|
|
$
|
3,481,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
|
|
1,526,995
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,590,821
|
|
|
|
1,535,758
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans(1)
|
|
|
5,029,907
|
|
|
|
3,857,728
|
|
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
321,522
|
|
|
|
567,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
8,434,839
|
|
|
|
7,488,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
|
|
363,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,579,600
|
|
|
|
1,744,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
13,928,451
|
|
|
|
13,077,889
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(528,120
|
)
|
|
|
(281,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
13,400,331
|
|
|
|
12,796,363
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
|
10,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
$
|
12,806,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, includes $1.2 billion of
commercial loans that are secured by real estate but are not
dependent upon the real estate for repayment. |
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had net
deferred origination fees on its loan portfolio amounting to
$5.2 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Total
loan portfolio is net of unearned income of $49.0 million
and $62.6 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, loans in which the accrual of
interest income had been discontinued amounted to
$1.6 billion (2008 $587.2 million). If
these loans were accruing interest, the additional interest
income realized would have been $57.9 million
(2008 $29.7 million; 2007
$22.7 million). Past due and still accruing loans, which
are contractually delinquent 90 days or more, amounted to
$165.9 million as of December 31, 2009
(2008 $471.4 million).
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation was servicing
residential mortgage loans owned by others aggregating
$1.1 billion (2008 $826.9 million) and
construction and commercial loans owned by others aggregating
$123.4 million (2008 $74.5 million).
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation was servicing
commercial loan participations owned by others aggregating
$235.0 million (2008 $191.2 million).
Various loans secured by first mortgages were assigned as
collateral for CDs, individual retirement accounts and advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The mortgages pledged as
collateral amounted to $1.9 billion as of December 31,
2009 (2008 $2.5 billion).
The Corporations primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The
Corporations Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, First Bank,
also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands markets
and in the United States (principally in
F-39
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the state of Florida). Of the total gross loan portfolio of
$13.9 billion as of December 31, 2009, approximately
83% have credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 9% in the
United States and 8% in the Virgin Islands.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had
$1.2 billion outstanding of credit facilities granted to
the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. A substantial portion of these credit
facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment, such as sales and
property taxes collected by the central Government
and/or
municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of
loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates
charged for services or products, such as electric power
utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the
good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality have been pledged to their repayment.
Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico Government and its
political subdivisions, the largest loan to one borrower as of
December 31, 2009 in the amount of $321.5 million is
with one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial
Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. During
the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation completed a
transaction with R&G Financial that involved the
purchase of approximately $205 million of residential
mortgage loans that previously served as collateral for a
commercial loan extended to R&G. The purchase price of the
transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the
loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporations
exposure to a single borrower.
|
|
Note 8
|
Allowance
for loan and lease losses
|
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
$
|
190,168
|
|
|
$
|
158,296
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
Losses charged against the allowance
|
|
|
(344,422
|
)
|
|
|
(117,072
|
)
|
|
|
(94,830
|
)
|
Recoveries credited to the allowance
|
|
|
11,158
|
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
6,092
|
|
Other adjustments(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
$
|
190,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to a
$218 million auto loan portfolio acquired in the third
quarter of 2008. |
The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for
loan and lease losses. The allowance for impaired loans covers
those loans for which management has determined that it is
probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts
due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan
agreement, and
F-40
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
does not necessarily represent loans for which the Corporation
will incur a loss. As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
impaired loans and their related allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs
|
|
$
|
1,060,088
|
|
|
$
|
384,914
|
|
|
$
|
66,941
|
|
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs
|
|
|
596,176
|
|
|
|
116,315
|
|
|
|
84,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
1,656,264
|
|
|
$
|
501,229
|
|
|
$
|
151,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans
|
|
|
182,145
|
|
|
|
83,353
|
|
|
|
7,523
|
|
During the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans
|
|
|
1,022,051
|
|
|
|
302,439
|
|
|
|
116,362
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans(1)
|
|
|
21,160
|
|
|
|
12,974
|
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2009 excludes interest income of approximately $4.7 million,
related to $761.5 million non-performing loans, that was applied
against the related principal balance under the cost-recovery
method. |
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and
related specific reserve during 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
501,229
|
|
Loans determined impaired during the year
|
|
|
1,466,805
|
|
Net charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
(244,154
|
)
|
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $49.6 million(2)
|
|
|
(39,374
|
)
|
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments
|
|
|
(28,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,656,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately $114.2 million, or 47%, is related to
construction loans in Florida and $44.6 million, or 18%, is
related to construction loans in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Related to five construction projects sold in Florida. |
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
83,353
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
342,946
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(244,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
182,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance
to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto
Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government.
Due to the nature of the borrowers financial condition,
the restructure or loan modification through these program as
well as other restructurings of individual commercial,
commercial mortgage loans, construction loans and residential
mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR). A restructuring
of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or
legal reasons related to the debtors financial
difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more
of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and
provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the
refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and
escrow, the
F-41
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
extension of the maturity of the loans and modifications of the
loan rate. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations
TDR loans consisted of $124.1 million of residential
mortgage loans, $42.1 million commercial and industrial
loans, $68.1 million commercial mortgage loans and
$101.7 million of construction loans. Outstanding unfunded
loan commitments on TDR loans amounted to $1.3 million as
of December 31, 2009.
Included in the $101.7 million of construction TDR loans
are certain impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into
two separate agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter
of 2009. Each of these loans were restructured into two notes;
one that represents the portion of the loan that is expected to
be fully collected along with contractual interest and the
second note that represents the portion of the original loan
that was charged-off. The renegotiations of these loans have
been made after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity
to serve the debt and ability to perform under the modified
terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note
of each loan have been placed on a monthly payment that amortize
the debt over 25 years at a market rate of interest. An
interest rate reduction was granted for the second note. The
following tables provide additional information about the volume
of this type of loan restructurings and the effect on the
allowance for loan and lease losses in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Principal balance deemed collectible
|
|
$
|
22,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount charged-off
|
|
$
|
(29,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
14,375
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
17,213
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(29,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loans comprising the $22.4 million that have been
deemed collectible continue to be individually evaluated for
impairment purposes. These transactions contributed to a
$29.9 million decrease in non-performing loans during the
last quarter of 2009.
|
|
Note 9
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
The Corporation granted loans to its directors, executive
officers and certain related individuals or entities in the
ordinary course of business. The movement and balance of these
loans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
182,573
|
|
New loans
|
|
|
44,963
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(48,380
|
)
|
Other changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
179,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New loans
|
|
|
3,549
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(6,405
|
)
|
Other changes
|
|
|
(152,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
24,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
These loans do not involve more than normal risk of
collectibility and management considers that they present terms
that are no more favorable than those that would have been
obtained if transactions had been with unrelated parties. The
amounts reported as other changes include changes in the status
of those who are considered related parties, mainly due to the
resignation of an independent director in 2009.
From time to time, the Corporation, in the ordinary course of
its business, obtains services from related parties or makes
contributions to non-profit organizations that have some
association with the Corporation. Management believes the terms
of such arrangements are consistent with arrangements entered
into with independent third parties.
Note 10
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment is comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
In Years
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
10 - 40
|
|
|
$
|
90,158
|
|
|
$
|
84,282
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1 - 15
|
|
|
|
57,522
|
|
|
|
52,945
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
|
|
123,582
|
|
|
|
119,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,262
|
|
|
|
256,646
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,459
|
)
|
|
|
(133,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,803
|
|
|
|
123,537
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,327
|
|
|
|
24,791
|
|
Projects in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,835
|
|
|
|
30,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197,965
|
|
|
$
|
178,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to
$20.8 million, $19.2 million and $17.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
|
|
Note 11
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangibles
|
Goodwill as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 amounted to
$28.1 million, recognized as part of Other
Assets. The Corporations conducted its annual
evaluation of goodwill and intangible during the fourth quarter
of 2009. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill of the Florida
reporting unit indicated potential impairment of goodwill;
however, impairment was not indicated based upon the results of
the Step 2 analysis. Goodwill was not impaired as of
December 31, 2009 or 2008, nor was any goodwill written-off
due to impairment during 2009, 2008 and 2007. Refer to
Note 1 for additional details about the methodology used
for the goodwill impairment analysis.
As of December 31, 2009, the gross carrying amount and
accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was
$41.8 million and $25.2 million, respectively,
recognized as part of Other Assets in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(December 31, 2008 $45.8 million and
$21.8 million, respectively). For the year ended
December 31, 2009, the amortization expense of core deposit
intangibles amounted to $3.4 million (2008
$3.6 million; 2007 $3.3 million). As a
result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles,
there was an impairment charge of $4.0 million recognized
during 2009 related to core deposits in FirstBank Florida
attributable to decreases in the base of core deposits acquired
and recorded as part of other non-interest expenses in the
Statement of (Loss) Income.
F-43
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the estimated aggregate annual
amortization expense of the core deposit intangible:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,557
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,522
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,522
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,522
|
|
2014 and thereafter
|
|
|
6,477
|
|
|
|
Note 12
|
Servicing
Assets
|
As disclosed in Note 1, the Corporation is actively
involved in the securitization of pools of FHA-insured and
VA-guaranteed mortgages for issuance of GNMA mortgage-backed
securities. Also, certain conventional conforming-loans are sold
to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing retained. The Corporation
recognizes as separate assets the rights to service loans for
others, whether those servicing assets are originated or
purchased.
The changes in servicing assets are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
8,151
|
|
|
$
|
7,504
|
|
|
$
|
5,317
|
|
Capitalization of servicing assets
|
|
|
6,072
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Servicing assets purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(2,321
|
)
|
|
|
(1,533
|
)
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance before valuation allowance at end of year
|
|
|
11,902
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
Valuation allowance for temporary impairment
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
(751
|
)
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
11,157
|
|
|
$
|
7,400
|
|
|
$
|
7,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges are recognized through a valuation allowance
for each individual stratum of servicing assets. The valuation
allowance is adjusted to reflect the amount, if any, by which
the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum of
loans being serviced exceeds its fair value. Any fair value in
excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given
stratum is not recognized.
Other-than-temporary
impairments, if any, are recognized as a direct write-down of
the servicing assets.
Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Temporary impairment charges
|
|
|
2,537
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
(2,543
|
)
|
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net servicing income are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Servicing fees
|
|
$
|
3,082
|
|
|
$
|
2,565
|
|
|
$
|
2,133
|
|
Late charges and prepayment penalties
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income, gross
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
Amortization and impairment of servicing assets
|
|
|
(2,315
|
)
|
|
|
(1,948
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income, net
|
|
$
|
1,348
|
|
|
$
|
1,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations servicing assets are subject to
prepayment and interest rate risks. Key economic assumptions
used in determining the fair value at the time of sale ranged as
follows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Minimum
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
21.9
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Discount rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Discount rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constant prepayment rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
Discount rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government guaranteed mortgage loans
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Conventional conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Conventional non-conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
At December 31, 2009, fair values of the Corporations
servicing assets were based on a valuation model that
incorporates market driven assumptions, adjusted by the
particular characteristics of the Corporations servicing
portfolio, regarding discount rates and mortgage prepayment
rates. The weighted-averages of the key
F-45
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
economic assumptions used by the Corporation in its valuation
model and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate
10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those
assumptions for mortgage loans at December 31, 2009, were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
Carrying amount of servicing assets
|
|
$
|
11,157
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
12,920
|
|
Weighted-average expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate)
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate)
|
|
|
11.10
|
%
|
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with
caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on
a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in
assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also,
in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the servicing asset is
calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality,
changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for
example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower
prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
|
|
Note 13
|
Deposits
and Related Interest
|
Deposits and related interest consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Type of account and interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing checking accounts
|
|
$
|
697,022
|
|
|
$
|
625,928
|
|
Savings accounts 0.50% to 2.52% (2008 - 0.80% to
3.75)%
|
|
|
1,774,273
|
|
|
|
1,288,179
|
|
Interest bearing checking accounts 0.50% to 2.79%
(2008 0.75% to 3.75% )
|
|
|
985,470
|
|
|
|
726,731
|
|
Certificates of deposit 0.15% to 7.00%
(2008 0.75% to 7.00)%
|
|
|
1,650,866
|
|
|
|
1,986,770
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit(1) 0.25% to 5.30%
(2008 2.15% to 6.00)%
|
|
|
7,561,416
|
|
|
|
8,429,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
$
|
13,057,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $0 and $1,150,959 measured at fair value as of December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
The weighted average interest rate on total deposits as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 was 2.06% and 3.63%,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of overdrafts
in demand deposits that were reclassified as loans amounted to
$16.5 million (2008 $12.8 million).
F-46
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents a summary of CDs, including
brokered CDs, with a remaining term of more than one year as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Over one year to two years
|
|
$
|
1,786,651
|
|
Over two years to three years
|
|
|
1,048,911
|
|
Over three years to four years
|
|
|
279,467
|
|
Over four years to five years
|
|
|
42,382
|
|
Over five years
|
|
|
13,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,171,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, CDs in denominations of $100,000
or higher amounted to $8.6 billion (2008
$9.6 billion) including brokered CDs of $7.6 billion
(2008 $8.4 billion) at a weighted average rate
of 2.13% (2008 4.03%) issued to deposit brokers in
the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit
that are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less
than $100,000. As of December 31, 2009, unamortized broker
placement fees amounted to $23.2 million (2008
$21.6 million), which are amortized over the contractual
maturity of the brokered CDs under the interest method. During
2009, all of the $1.1 billion of brokered CDs measured at
fair value that were outstanding at December 31, 2008 were
called. The Corporation exercised its call option on
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs after the cancellation of interest rate swaps by
counterparties due to lower levels of
3-month
LIBOR. Some of these brokered CDs were replaced by new brokered
CDs not hedged with interest rate swaps and not measured at fair
value, causing the increase in the unamortized balance of broker
placement fees.
As of December 31, 2009, deposit accounts issued to
government agencies with a carrying value of $447.5 million
(2008 $564.3 million) were collateralized by
securities and loans with an amortized cost of
$539.1 million (2008 $600.5 million) and
estimated market value of $541.9 million (2008
$604.6 million), and by municipal obligations with a
carrying value and estimated market value of $66.3 million
(2008 $32.4 million).
A table showing interest expense on deposits follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts
|
|
$
|
19,995
|
|
|
$
|
12,914
|
|
|
$
|
11,365
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
19,032
|
|
|
|
18,916
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
50,939
|
|
|
|
73,466
|
|
|
|
82,761
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
224,521
|
|
|
|
309,542
|
|
|
|
419,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
314,487
|
|
|
$
|
414,838
|
|
|
$
|
528,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest expense on deposits includes the market valuation
of interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs, the
related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker placement
fees related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value and
changes in the fair value of callable brokered CDs measured at
fair value.
F-47
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits
|
|
$
|
295,004
|
|
|
$
|
407,830
|
|
|
$
|
515,394
|
|
Amortization of broker placement fees(1)
|
|
|
22,858
|
|
|
|
15,665
|
|
|
|
9,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized (gain)
loss on derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value
|
|
|
317,862
|
|
|
|
423,495
|
|
|
|
524,450
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives and brokered CDs
measured at fair value
|
|
|
(3,375
|
)
|
|
|
(8,657
|
)
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits
|
|
$
|
314,487
|
|
|
$
|
414,838
|
|
|
$
|
528,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value. |
Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements
on interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs that
for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to net
interest realized of $5.5 million
(2008 net interest realized of
$35.6 million; 2007 net interest incurred of
$12.3 million).
As of December 31, 2009, loans payable consisted of
$900 million in short-term borrowings under the FED
Discount Window Program bearing interest at 1.00%. The
Corporation participates in the
Borrower-in-Custody
(BIC) Program of the FED. Through the BIC Program, a
broad range of loans (including commercial, consumer and
mortgages) may be pledged as collateral for borrowings through
the FED Discount Window. As of December 31, 2009 collateral
pledged related to this credit facility amounted to
$1.2 billion, mainly commercial, consumer and mortgage loan.
|
|
Note 15
|
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December, 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 0.23% to 5.39%
(2008 2.29% to 5.39%)(1)
|
|
$
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,421,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, includes $1.4 billion with an average
rate of 4.29%, which lenders have the right to call before their
contractual maturities at various dates beginning on February 1,
2010 |
The weighted-average interest rates on repurchase agreements as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were 3.34% and 3.85%,
respectively. Accrued interest payable on repurchase agreements
amounted to $18.1 million and $21.2 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
F-48
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
One to thirty days
|
|
$
|
196,628
|
|
Over thirty to ninety days
|
|
|
380,003
|
|
Over ninety days to one year
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
One to three years
|
|
|
1,600,000
|
|
Three to five years
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following securities were sold under agreements to
repurchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
of Underlying
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Underlying Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Rate of Security
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of other U.S.
Government Sponsored Agencies
|
|
$
|
871,725
|
|
|
$
|
794,267
|
|
|
$
|
875,835
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,504,941
|
|
|
|
2,282,364
|
|
|
|
2,560,374
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,376,666
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,436,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
$
|
13,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Cost of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
of Underlying
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Underlying Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Rate of Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of other U.S.
Government Sponsored Agencies
|
|
$
|
511,621
|
|
|
$
|
459,289
|
|
|
$
|
514,796
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,299,221
|
|
|
|
2,961,753
|
|
|
|
3,376,421
|
|
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,810,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,421,042
|
|
|
$
|
3,891,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
$
|
20,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maximum aggregate balance outstanding at any month-end
during 2009 was $4.1 billion (2008
$4.1 billion). The average balance during 2009 was
$3.6 billion (2008 $3.6 billion). The
weighted average interest rate during 2009 and 2008 was 3.22%
and 3.71%, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the securities underlying
such agreements were delivered to the dealers with which the
repurchase agreements were transacted.
F-49
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2009, grouped by
counterparty, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Maturity (In Months)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
|
|
$
|
1,051,731
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Barclays Capital
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
JP Morgan Chase
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Dean Witter / Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
349,900
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
Following is a summary of the advances from the FHLB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December, 31
|
|
|
December, 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB with a weighted-average interest
rate of 3.21% (2008 3.09)%
|
|
$
|
978,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,060,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December, 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
One to thirty days
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Over thirty to ninety days
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Over ninety days to one year
|
|
|
307,000
|
|
One to three years
|
|
|
445,000
|
|
Three to five years
|
|
|
208,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances are received from the FHLB under an Advances,
Collateral Pledge and Security Agreement (the Collateral
Agreement). Under the Collateral Agreement, the
Corporation is required to maintain a minimum amount of
qualifying mortgage collateral with a market value of generally
125% or higher than the outstanding advances. As of
December 31, 2009, the estimated value of specific mortgage
loans pledged as collateral amounted to $1.1 billion
(2008 $1.7 billion), as computed by the FHLB
for collateral purposes. The carrying value of such loans as of
December 31, 2009 amounted to $1.8 billion
(2008 $2.4 billion). In addition, securities
with an approximate estimated value of $4.1 million
(2008 $5.6 million) and a carrying value of
$4.1 million (2008 $5.7 million) were
pledged to the FHLB. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation had additional capacity of approximately
$378 million on this credit facility based on collateral
pledged at the FHLB, including a haircut reflecting the
perceived risk associated with holding the collateral. Haircut
refers to the percentage by which an assets market value
is reduced for purpose of collateral levels. Advances may be
repaid prior to maturity, in whole or in part, at the option of
the borrower upon payment of any applicable fee specified in the
contract governing such advance. In calculating the fee due
consideration is given to (i) all relevant factors,
including but not limited to, any and all applicable costs of
repurchasing
and/or
prepaying any associated liabilities
and/or
hedges entered into with respect to the applicable advance; and
(ii) the financial characteristics, in their entirety, of
the advance being prepaid; and (iii), in the case of
F-50
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
adjustable-rate advances, the expected future earnings of the
replacement borrowing as long as the replacement borrowing is at
least equal to the original advances par amount and the
replacement borrowings tenor is at least equal to the
remaining maturity of the prepaid advance.
Notes payable consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest from
5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of December 31, 2009 and
2008) maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair
value
|
|
$
|
13,361
|
|
|
$
|
10,141
|
|
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal protected
notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
6,245
|
|
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011
|
|
|
7,214
|
|
|
|
6,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,117
|
|
|
$
|
23,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18
|
Other
Borrowings
|
Other borrowings consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at
a floating-rate of 2.75% over
3-month
LIBOR (3.00% as of December 31, 2009 and 4.62% as of
December 31, 2008)
|
|
$
|
103,093
|
|
|
$
|
103,048
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at
a floating-rate of 2.50% over
3-month
LIBOR (2.75% as of December 31, 2009 and 4.00% as of
December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
128,866
|
|
|
|
128,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
231,959
|
|
|
$
|
231,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19
|
Unused
Lines of Credit
|
The Corporation maintains unsecured uncommitted lines of credit
with other banks. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporations total unused lines of credit with these banks
amounted to $165 million (2008
$220 million). As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation has an available line of credit with the FHLB-New
York guaranteed with excess collateral already pledged, in the
amount of $378.6 million (2008
$626.9 million).
F-51
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 20
Earnings per Common Share
The calculations of earnings per common share for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends(1)
|
|
|
(42,661
|
)
|
|
|
(40,276
|
)
|
|
|
(40,276
|
)
|
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion
|
|
|
(4,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
69,661
|
|
|
$
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,508
|
|
|
|
86,549
|
|
Average potential common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,644
|
|
|
|
86,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, preferred stock dividends
include $12.6 million of Series F Preferred Stock cumulative
preferred dividends not declared as of the end of the year.
Refer to Note 23 for additional information related to the
Series F Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in
connection with the Trouble Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital
Purchase Program. |
(Loss) earnings per common share are computed by dividing net
(loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted average common shares issued and outstanding. Net
(loss) income attributable to common stockholders represents net
(loss) income adjusted for preferred stock dividends including
dividends declared, accretion of discount on preferred stock
issuances and cumulative dividends related to the current
dividend period that have not been declared as of the end of the
period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding exclude
unvested shares of restricted stock.
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under
the assumed exercise of stock options, unvested shares of
restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury
stock method. This method assumes that the potential common
shares are issued and the proceeds from the exercise, in
addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to
future services, are used to purchase common stock at the
exercise date. The difference between the number of potential
shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental
shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute
diluted earnings per share. Stock options, unvested shares of
restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower
potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury
stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive
earnings per share since their inclusion would have an
antidilutive effect on earnings per share. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, there were 2,481,310 outstanding stock
options, warrants outstanding to purchase 5,842,259 shares
of common stock related to the TARP Capital Purchase Program and
32,216 shares of restricted stock that were excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the
Corporation reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders for the year and their inclusion would have an
antidilutive effect. Refer to Note 23 for additional
information related to the issuance of the Series F
F-52
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Preferred Stock and Warrants (as hereinafter defined) under the
TARP Capital Purchase Program. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, there were 2,020,600 weighted-average
outstanding stock options, which were excluded from the
computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion
would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.
|
|
Note 21
|
Regulatory
Capital Requirements
|
The Corporation is subject to various regulatory capital
requirements imposed by the federal banking agencies. Failure to
meet minimum capital requirements can result in certain
mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material
effect on the Corporations financial statements. Under
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action, the Corporation must meet specific
capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the
Corporations assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance
sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.
The Corporations capital amounts and classification are
also subject to qualitative judgment by the regulators about
components, risk weightings and other factors.
Capital standards established by regulations require the
Corporation to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of
Tier 1 capital to total average assets (leverage ratio) and
ratios of Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets,
as defined in the regulations. The total amount of risk-weighted
assets is computed by applying risk-weighting factors to the
Corporations assets and certain off-balance sheet items,
which vary from 0% to 200% depending on the nature of the asset.
As of December 31, 2009 the Corporation was in compliance
with the minimum regulatory capital requirements.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation and each
of its subsidiary banks were categorized as
well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events
since December 31, 2009 that management believes have
changed any subsidiary banks capital category.
F-53
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Corporations and its banking subsidiarys
regulatory capital positions were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
To be
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Well-Capitalized
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
$
|
1,922,138
|
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,144,280
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
$
|
1,838,378
|
|
|
|
12.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,142,795
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,428,494
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
$
|
1,739,363
|
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
$
|
572,140
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
First Bank
|
|
$
|
1,670,878
|
|
|
|
11.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
571,398
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
857,097
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
$
|
1,739,363
|
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
740,844
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
$
|
1,670,878
|
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
783,087
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
978,859
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
$
|
1,762,474
|
|
|
|
12.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,100,990
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
$
|
1,602,538
|
|
|
|
12.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,048,065
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,310,082
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
$
|
1,589,854
|
|
|
|
11.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
550,495
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
$
|
1,438,265
|
|
|
|
10.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
524,033
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
786,049
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
$
|
1,589,854
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
765,935
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
$
|
1,438,265
|
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
$
|
728,409
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
910,511
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
Note 22
|
Stock
Option Plan
|
Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock
option plan (the 1997 stock option plan) that
authorized the granting of up to 8,696,112 options on shares of
the Corporations common stock to eligible employees. The
options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the
number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for
the purchase of one share of common stock at a price not less
than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option
was granted. Stock options were fully vested upon grant. The
maximum term to exercise the options is ten years. The stock
option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the
exercise price and the number of shares that can be purchased in
the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification of
stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and
distributions such as stock appreciation rights.
Under the 1997 stock option plan, the Compensation and Benefits
Committee (the Compensation Committee) had the
authority to grant stock appreciation rights at any time
subsequent to the grant of an option. Pursuant to stock
appreciation rights, the optionee surrenders the right to
exercise an option granted under the plan in consideration for
payment by the Corporation of an amount equal to the excess of
the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to
such option surrendered over the total option price of such
shares. Any option surrendered is cancelled by the Corporation
and the shares subject to the option are not eligible for
further grants under the option plan. During the second quarter
of 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock
appreciation rights to an executive officer. The employee
surrendered
F-54
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the right to exercise 120,000 stock options in the form of stock
appreciation rights for a payment of $0.2 million. On
January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all
outstanding awards granted under this plan continue in full
force and effect, subject to their original terms. No awards for
shares could be granted under the 1997 stock option plan as of
its expiration.
On April 29, 2008, the Corporations stockholders
approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the
Omnibus Plan). The Omnibus Plan provides for
equity-based compensation incentives (the awards)
through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares,
and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of
up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to
adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar
events. The Corporations Board of Directors, upon
receiving the relevant recommendation of the Compensation
Committee, has the power and authority to determine those
eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and
conditions of any awards subject to various limits and vesting
restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards.
Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or
in part, of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock or
shares of Common Stock acquired by the Corporation. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, the Corporation granted
36,243 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of
$8.69 under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporations
independent directors. The following table shows the activity of
restricted stock during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
36,243
|
|
Restricted shares forfeited
|
|
|
(4,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period outstanding
|
|
|
32,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period vested restricted shares
|
|
|
10,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Corporation recognized $92,361 and $8,750, respectively, of
stock-based compensation expense related to the aforementioned
restricted stock awards. The total unrecognized compensation
cost related to these non-vested restricted shares was $213,889
as of December 31, 2009 and is expected to be recognized
over the next 1.9 year.
The Corporation accounts for stock options using the
modified prospective method. There were no stock
options granted during 2009 and 2008, therefore no compensation
associated with stock options was recorded in those years. The
compensation expense associated with stock options for the
2007 year was approximately $2.8 million. All employee
stock options granted during 2007 were fully vested at the time
of grant.
Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the
Corporation to develop an estimate of the number of share-based
awards which will be forfeited due to employee or director
turnover. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may
have a significant effect on share-based compensation, as the
effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is
recognized in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is
changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the
estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to
increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a
decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements.
If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated
forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to decrease the
estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to
the expense recognized in the financial statements. When
unvested options or shares of restricted stock are forfeited,
any compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited
awards is reversed in the period of the forfeiture. During 2009,
as shown above, 4,027 unvested shares of restricted stock were
forfeited resulting in the reversal of $9,722 of previously
recorded stock-based compensation expense.
F-55
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity of stock options during the year ended
December 31, 2009 is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Value (In
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
3,910,910
|
|
|
$
|
12.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
(1,429,600
|
)
|
|
|
11.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period outstanding and exercisable
|
|
|
2,481,310
|
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of options granted in 2007, which was estimated
using the Black-Scholes option pricing method, and the
assumptions used are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted-average stock price at grant date and exercise price
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
Stock option estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
2.40-$2.45
|
|
Weighted-average estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
2.43
|
|
Expected stock option term (years)
|
|
|
4.31-4.59
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected volatility
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected dividend yield
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
The Corporation uses empirical research data to estimate option
exercises and employee termination within the valuation model;
separate groups of employees that have similar historical
exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation
purposes. The expected volatility is based on the historical
implied volatility of the Corporations common stock at
each grant date; otherwise, historical volatilities based upon
260 observations (working days) were obtained from Bloomberg
L.P. (Bloomberg) and used as inputs in the model.
The dividend yield is based on the historical
12-month
dividend yield observable at each grant date. The risk-free rate
for the period is based on historical zero coupon curves
obtained from Bloomberg at the time of grant based on the
options expected term.
Cash proceeds from 6,000 options exercised in 2008 amounted to
approximately $53,000 and did not have any intrinsic value. No
stock options were exercised during 2009 or 2007.
|
|
Note 23
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
Common
stock
The Corporation has 250,000,000 authorized shares of common
stock with a par value of $1 per share. As of December 31,
2009, there were 102,440,522 (2008 102,444,549)
shares issued and 92,542,722 (2008 92,546,749)
shares outstanding. In February 2009, the Corporations
Board of Directors declared a first quarter cash dividend of
$0.07 per common share which was paid on March 31, 2009 to
common stockholders of record on March 15, 2009 and in May
2009 declared a second quarter dividend of $0.07 per common
share which was paid on June 30, 2009 to common
stockholders of record on June 15, 2009. On July 30,
2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of common and
preferred dividends effective with the preferred dividend for
the month of August 2009.
F-56
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 1, 2008, the Corporation granted
36,243 shares of restricted stock under the Omnibus Plan to
the Corporations independent directors, of which 4,027
were forfeited in 2009 due to the departure of a director. The
restrictions on such restricted stock award lapse ratably on an
annual basis over a three-year period. The shares of restricted
stock may vest more quickly in the event of death, disability,
retirement, or a change in control. Based on particular
circumstances evaluated by the Compensation Committee as they
may relate to the termination of a restricted stock holder, the
Corporations Board of Directors may, with the
recommendation of the Compensation Committee, grant the full
vesting of the restricted stock held upon termination of
employment. Holders of restricted stock have the right to
dividends or dividend equivalents, as applicable, during the
restriction period. Such dividends or dividend equivalents will
accrue during the restriction period, but not be paid until
restrictions lapse. The holder of restricted stocks has the
right to vote the shares.
Stock
repurchase plan and treasury stock
The Corporation has a stock repurchase program under which from
time to time it repurchases shares of common stock in the open
market and holds them as treasury stock. No shares of common
stock were repurchased during 2009 and 2008 by the Corporation.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, of the total amount of
common stock repurchased in prior years, 9,897,800 shares
were held as treasury stock and were available for general
corporate purposes.
Preferred
stock
The Corporation has 50,000,000 authorized shares of preferred
stock with a par value of $1, redeemable at the
Corporations option subject to certain terms. This stock
may be issued in series and the shares of each series shall have
such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of
Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular
series. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has five
outstanding series of non-convertible non-cumulative preferred
stock: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred
stock, Series A; 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly
income preferred stock, Series B; 7.40% non-cumulative
perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C; 7.25%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series D; and 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income
preferred stock, Series E, which trade on the NYSE. The
liquidation value per share is $25. Annual dividends of $1.75
per share (Series E), $1.8125 per share (Series D),
$1.85 per share (Series C), $2.0875 per share
(Series B) and $1.78125 per share
(Series A) are payable monthly, if declared by the
Board of Directors. Dividends declared on the non-convertible
non-cumulative preferred stock for 2009, 2008 and 2007 amounted
to $23.5 million, $40.3 million and
$40.3 million, respectively.
In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase
Program, established as part of the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the
U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000
liquidation preference value per share. The Series F
Preferred Stock has a call feature after three years. In
connection with this investment, the Corporation also issued to
the U.S. Treasury a
10-year
warrant (the Warrant) to purchase
5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common stock at
an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The Corporation
registered the Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and
the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant for sale under
the Securities Act of 1933. The Corporation recorded the total
$400 million of the preferred shares and the Warrant at
their relative fair values of $374.2 million and
$25.8 million, respectively. The preferred shares were
valued using a discounted cash flow analysis and applying a
discount rate of 10.9%. The difference from the par amount of
the preferred shares is accreted to preferred stock over five
years using the interest method with a corresponding adjustment
to preferred dividends. The Cox-Rubinstein binomial model was
used to estimate the value of the Warrant with a strike price
calculated, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement with
the U.S. Treasury, based on the average closing prices of
the common stock on the 20 trading days ending the last day
prior to the date of approval to participate in the Program. No
credit risk was assumed
F-57
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
given the Corporations availability of authorized, but
unissued common shares; as well as its intention of reserving
sufficient shares to satisfy the exercise of the warrants. The
volatility parameter input was the historical
5-year
common stock price volatility.
The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1
regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F
Preferred Stock accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a
quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five
years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only
be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporations Board
of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The
Series F Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with the
Corporations existing Series A through E, in terms of
dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation,
dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase
Agreement relating to this issuance contains limitations on the
payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular
quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last
quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly
announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14,
2008, which is $0.07 per share. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, preferred stock dividends of
Series F Preferred Stock amounted to $19.2 million,
including $12.6 million of cumulative preferred dividends
not declared as of the end of the period.
The Warrant has a
10-year term
and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are
subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
The possible future issuance of equity securities through the
exercise of the Warrant could affect the Corporations
current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock
(the shares underlying the warrant represent approximately 6% of
the Corporations shares of common stock as of
December 31, 2009);
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the
outstanding shares of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
|
As mentioned above, on July 30, 2009, the Corporation
announced the suspension of dividends for common and all its
outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was
effective with the dividends for the month of August 2009, on
the Corporations five outstanding series of non-cumulative
preferred stock and dividends for the Corporations
outstanding Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock and the
Corporations common stock. As a result of the dividend
suspension, the terms of the Series F Cumulative Preferred
Stock include limitations on the resumption of the payment of
cash dividends and purchases of outstanding shares of common and
preferred stock.
Legal
surplus
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that
a minimum of 10% of FirstBanks net income for the year be
transferred to legal surplus until such surplus equals the total
of
paid-in-capital
on common and preferred stock. Amounts transferred to the legal
surplus account from the retained earnings account are not
available for distribution to the stockholders.
|
|
Note 24
|
Employees
Benefit Plan
|
FirstBank provides contributory retirement plans pursuant to
Section 1165(e) of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code
for Puerto Rico employees and Section 401(k) of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code for U.S.Virgin Islands and
U.S. employees (the Plans). All employees are
eligible to participate in the Plans after three months of
service for purposes of making elective deferral contributions
and one year of service for purposes of sharing in the
Banks matching, qualified matching and qualified
nonelective contributions. Under the provisions of the Plans,
the Bank contributes 25% of the first 4% of the
participants compensation
F-58
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contributed to the Plans on a pre-tax basis. Participants are
permitted to contribute up to $9,000 for 2009 and 2010, $10,000
for 2011 and 2012 and $12,000 beginning on January 1, 2013
($16,500 for 2009 for U.S.V.I. and U.S. employees).
Additional contributions to the Plans are voluntarily made by
the Bank as determined by its Board of Directors. The Bank had a
total plan expense of $1.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, $1.5 million for 2008 and
$1.4 million for 2007.
FirstBank Florida provides a contributory retirement plan
pursuant to Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code for its U.S. employees (the Plan).
All employees are eligible to participate in the Plan after six
months of service. Under the provisions of the Plan, FirstBank
Florida contributes 100% of the first 3% of the
participants contribution and 50% of the next 2%
participants contribution up to a maximum of 4% of the
participants compensation. Participants are permitted to
contribute up to $16,500 per year (participants over
50 years of age are permitted an additional $5,500
contribution). FirstBank Florida had total plan expenses of
approximately $151,000 for 2009, approximately $157,000 for 2008
and approximately $114,000 for 2007.
|
|
Note 25
|
Other
Non-interest Income
|
A detail of other non-interest income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other commissions and fees
|
|
$
|
469
|
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
Insurance income
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
|
|
10,157
|
|
|
|
10,877
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,893
|
|
|
|
18,150
|
|
|
|
13,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,030
|
|
|
$
|
28,727
|
|
|
$
|
24,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 26
Other Non-interest Expenses
A detail of other non-interest expenses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Servicing and processing fees
|
|
$
|
10,174
|
|
|
$
|
9,918
|
|
|
$
|
6,574
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
8,283
|
|
|
|
8,856
|
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
Depreciation and expenses on revenue earning
equipment
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
Supplies and printing
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
Core deposit intangible impairment
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,483
|
|
|
|
17,443
|
|
|
|
18,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,342
|
|
|
$
|
41,974
|
|
|
$
|
39,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state
taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on
its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First
BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income
tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income
tax only on its income from sources within the United States or
income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business within the United States. Any such tax paid is
creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against
the Corporations Puerto
F-59
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to
U.S.Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within that
jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is also creditable against the
Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain
conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended
(the PR Code), the Corporation and its subsidiaries
are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to
file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is not
able to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in
another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax
benefit from a net operating loss, a particular subsidiary must
be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the
applicable carry forward period (7 years under the PR
Code). The PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of
100% on dividends received from controlled
subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on
dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.
Dividend payments from a U.S. subsidiary to the Corporation
are subject to a 10% withholding tax based on the provisions of
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Under the PR Code, First BanCorp is subject to a maximum
statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009 the Puerto Rico Government
approved Act No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate
Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico
Governments fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of
temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a
5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is
applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income
exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the
maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in
capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This
temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced
after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that
applies if the Corporations regular income tax liability
is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than
the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government
obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from
U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business
through International Banking Entities (IBEs) of the
Corporation and the Bank and through the Banks subsidiary,
FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the interest income and
gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income
taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to the special 5%
tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to
the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax
years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before
January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas
Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity
Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total Puerto Rico tax
exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto
Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at
normal rates to the extent that the IBEs net income
exceeds 20% of the banks total net taxable income.
The effect of a higher temporary statutory tax rate over the
normal statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax
benefit of $10.4 million for 2009 that was partially offset
by an income tax provision of $6.6 million related to the
special 5% tax on the operations FirstBank Overseas Corporation.
The components of income tax expense for the years ended
December 31 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
$
|
11,520
|
|
|
$
|
(7,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,925
|
)
|
Deferred income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(16,054
|
)
|
|
|
38,853
|
|
|
|
(13,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
$
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,732
|
|
|
$
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The differences between the income tax expense applicable to
income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed
by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Computed income tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
110,832
|
|
|
|
40.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
(30,500
|
)
|
|
|
(39.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(34,990
|
)
|
|
|
(39.0
|
)%
|
Federal and state taxes
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
Non-tax deductible expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1,111
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
Benefit of net exempt income
|
|
|
52,293
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
49,799
|
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
23,974
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
(184,397
|
)
|
|
|
(68.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2,446
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(7,003
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
Reversal of Unrecognized Tax Benefits
|
|
|
18,515
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
10,559
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Settlement payment closing agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,395
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Other-net
|
|
|
(1,466
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,476
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
$
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
(24.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their tax
bases. Significant components of the Corporations deferred
tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
$
|
212,933
|
|
|
$
|
106,879
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivative activities
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Legal reserve
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Reserve for insurance premium cancellations
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
Net operating loss and donation carryforward available
|
|
|
68,572
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
Impairment on investments
|
|
|
4,622
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
Unrealized net loss on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Realized loss on investments
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Settlement payment closing agreement
|
|
|
7,313
|
|
|
|
9,652
|
|
Interest expense accrual Unrecognized Tax Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
Other reserves and allowances
|
|
|
12,665
|
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
312,323
|
|
|
|
142,446
|
|
Deferred tax liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
4,629
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
Differences between the assigned values and tax bases of assets
and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
Unrealized gain on other investments
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(191,672
|
)
|
|
|
(7,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
$
|
109,197
|
|
|
$
|
128,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2009, the Corporation recorded income tax expense of
$4.5 million compared to an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million for 2008. The fluctuation in income tax
expense mainly resulted from a $184.4 million non-cash
increase of the valuation allowance for the Corporations
deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance does
not have any impact on the Corporations liquidity or cash
flow, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from
using tax losses, tax credits or other deferred tax assets in
the future. As of December 31, 2009, the deferred tax
asset, net of a valuation allowance of $191.7 million,
amounted to $109.2 million compared to $128.0 million
as of December 31, 2008.
Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess
whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their
deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not realization
standard. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce
the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than
not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant
weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively
verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The
accounting for income taxes guidance requires the consideration
of all sources of taxable income available to
F-62
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of
existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive
of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In
assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a
significant negative factor that resulted in the increase of the
valuation allowance was that the Corporations banking
subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico was in a three-year historical
cumulative loss as of the end of the year 2009, mainly as a
result of charges to the provision for loan and lease losses,
especially in the construction portfolio both in Puerto Rico and
the United States, resulting from the economic downturn. As of
December 31, 2009, management concluded that
$109.2 million of the deferred tax assets will be realized.
In assessing the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax
assets, management has considered all four sources of taxable
income mentioned above and even though sufficient profits are
expected in the next seven years to realized the deferred tax
asset, given current uncertain economic conditions, the Company
has only relied on tax-planning strategies as the main source of
taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset amount. Among
the most significant tax-planning strategies identified are:
(i) sale of appreciated assets, (ii) consolidation of
profitable and unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each
Company files a separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns
are permitted), and (iii) deferral of deductions without
affecting its utilization. Management will continue monitoring
the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets in future
periods. If future events differ from managements
December 31, 2009 assessment, an additional valuation
allowance may need to be established which may have a material
adverse effect on the Corporations results of operations.
Similarly, to the extent the realization of a portion, or all,
of the tax asset becomes more likely than not based
on changes in circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes
in tax laws or other relevant changes), a reversal of that
portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then
be recorded.
The tax effect of the unrealized holding gain or loss on
securities
available-for-sale,
excluding that on securities held by the Corporations
international banking entities which is exempt, was computed
based on a 15.75% capital gain tax rate, and is included in
accumulated other comprehensive income as part of
stockholders equity.
At December 31, 2009, the Corporations deferred tax
asset related to loss and other carry-forwards was
$74 million. This was comprised of net operating loss
carry-forward of $68.1 million, which will begin expiring
in 2016, an alternative minimum tax credit carry-forward of
$1.6 million, an extraordinary tax credit carryover of
$3.8 million, and a charitable contribution carry-forward
of $0.5 million which will begin expiring in 2014.
In June 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that
prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income
tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to
be taken on income tax returns. Under the authoritative
accounting guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and
measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a tax position
must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its
technical merits in order to be recognized, and 2) the
benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of that
position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon
settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in
accordance with this model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax
return is referred to as an UTB.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs
by $10.8 million and related accrued interest of
$5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations
for the 2004 taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation
entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of the
Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all
possible income and withholding tax deficiencies related to
taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of such
agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of
2009 the remaining UTBs and related interest by approximately
$2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of
the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of
December 31, 2009. The beginning UTB balance of
$15.6 million as of
F-63
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2008 (excluding accrued interest of
$6.8 million) reconciles to the ending balance in the
following table.
Reconciliation
of the Change in Unrecognized Tax Benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
15,600
|
|
Increases related to positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
173
|
|
Decreases related to positions taken during prior years
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
Expiration of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(10,733
|
)
|
Audit settlement
|
|
|
(4,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation classified all interest and penalties, if any,
related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. As of
December 31, 2008, the Corporations accrual for
interest that relates to tax uncertainties amounted to
$6.8 million. As of December 31, 2008, there is no
need to accrue for the payment of penalties. For the year ended
on December 31, 2009, the total amount of accrued interest
reversed by the Corporation through income tax expense was
$6.8 million. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease
for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for
current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax
returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitations,
changes in managements judgment about the level of
uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and
legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
|
|
Note 28
|
Lease
Commitments
|
As of December 31, 2009, certain premises are leased with
terms expiring through the year 2034. The Corporation has the
option to renew or extend certain leases beyond the original
term. Some of these leases require the payment of insurance,
increases in property taxes and other incidental costs. As of
December 31, 2009, the obligation under various leases
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
10,342
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,680
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,682
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
2015 and later years
|
|
|
30,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
63,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense included in occupancy and equipment expense was
$11.8 million in 2009 (2008 $11.6 million;
2007 $11.2 million).
In February 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
permits the measurement of selected eligible financial
instruments at fair value at specified election dates. The
Corporation elected to adopt the fair value option for certain
of its brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
F-64
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair
value option for certain brokered CDs and medium-term notes on
January 1, 2007. Amounts shown represent the carrying value
of the affected instruments before and after the changes in
accounting resulting from the adoption of the fair value option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening Statement of
|
|
|
|
Ending Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition as of
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition as of
|
|
|
Net Increase in
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
(After Adoption of
|
|
Transition Impact
|
|
(Prior to Adoption) (1)
|
|
|
Upon Adoption
|
|
|
Fair Value Option)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
(4,513,020
|
)
|
|
$
|
149,621
|
|
|
$
|
(4,363,399
|
)
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
(15,637
|
)
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
(14,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative-effect adjustment (pre-tax)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative-effect adjustment (net of tax) increased to retained
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of debt issue costs, placement fees and basis adjustment as
of December 31, 2006. |
Fair
Value Option
Callable
Brokered CDs and Certain Medium-Term Notes
The Corporation elected the fair value option for certain
financial liabilities that were hedged with interest rate swaps
that were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting.
As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, these
liabilities included certain medium-term notes with a fair value
of $13.4 million and $10.1 million, respectively, and
principal balance of $15.4 million recorded in notes
payable. As of December 31, 2008, liabilities recognized at
fair value also included callable brokered CDs with an aggregate
fair value of $1.15 billion and principal balance of
$1.13 billion, recorded in interest-bearing deposits.
Interest paid/accrued on these instruments is recorded as part
of interest expense and the accrued interest is part of the fair
value of the liabilities measured at fair value. Electing the
fair value option allows the Corporation to eliminate the burden
of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting (e.g.,
documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing
earnings volatility. Interest rate risk on the callable brokered
CDs measured at fair value was economically hedged with callable
interest rate swaps, with the same terms and conditions, until
they were all called during 2009. The Corporation did not elect
the fair value option for the vast majority of other brokered
CDs because these are not hedged by derivatives.
Medium-term notes and callable brokered CDs for which the
Corporation elected the fair value option were priced using
observable market data in the institutional markets.
Fair
Value Measurement
The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement
defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair
value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs may be used to
measure fair value:
Level 1 Valuations of Level 1 assets
and liabilities are obtained from readily available pricing
sources for market transactions involving identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity
securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well
as certain U.S. Treasury
F-65
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and other U.S. government and agency securities and
corporate debt securities that are traded by dealers or brokers
in active markets.
Level 2 Valuations of Level 2 assets
and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and
liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for
which the fair value is estimated based on the value of
identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with
quoted prices that are traded less frequently than
exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts
and financial liabilities (e.g., callable brokered CDs and
medium-term notes elected to be measured at fair value) whose
value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are
observable in the market or can be derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Valuations of Level 3 assets
and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for
which the determination of fair value requires significant
management judgment or estimation.
Estimated
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial
instruments required by GAAP is presented hereunder. The
aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily
represent managements estimate of the underlying value of
the Corporation.
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and,
therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the
underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could
significantly affect the results. In addition, the fair value
estimates are based on outstanding balances without attempting
to estimate the value of anticipated future business.
F-66
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the estimated fair value and
carrying value of financial instruments as of December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Condition
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Condition
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
|
|
$
|
704,084
|
|
|
$
|
704,084
|
|
|
$
|
405,733
|
|
|
$
|
405,733
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
3,862,342
|
|
|
|
3,862,342
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
601,619
|
|
|
|
621,584
|
|
|
|
1,706,664
|
|
|
|
1,720,412
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
64,145
|
|
|
|
64,145
|
|
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
|
|
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,088,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(528,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance
|
|
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
|
12,811,010
|
|
|
|
12,806,766
|
|
|
|
12,416,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
12,801,811
|
|
|
|
13,057,430
|
|
|
|
13,221,026
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
3,242,110
|
|
|
|
3,421,042
|
|
|
|
3,655,652
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
1,025,605
|
|
|
|
1,060,440
|
|
|
|
1,079,298
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
27,117
|
|
|
|
25,716
|
|
|
|
23,274
|
|
|
|
18,755
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
80,267
|
|
|
|
231,914
|
|
|
|
81,170
|
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
F-67
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, including financial liabilities for which the Corporation
has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
at Fair Value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
at Fair Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
U.S. agency debt and MBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,609,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,609,009
|
|
Puerto Rico Government Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,133
|
|
Private label MBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,983
|
|
|
|
113,983
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,959
|
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,141
|
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009, for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant to
|
|
|
|
Election of the Fair Value Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains and
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses and
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(Losses) and
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense on
|
|
|
Interest Expense on
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
Deposits(1)
|
|
|
Notes Payable(1)
|
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,068
|
)
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,069
|
)
|
|
|
(4,069
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2009
include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of
$10.8 million and interest expense on medium-term notes of
$0.8 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and
medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair
value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Income based on such instruments contractual
coupons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008, for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant to
|
|
|
|
Election of the Fair Value Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses and
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains and
|
|
|
Unrealized (Losses)
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense on
|
|
|
Interest Expense on
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
Deposits(1)
|
|
|
Notes Payable(1)
|
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
(174,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(174,208
|
)
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(174,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,316
|
|
|
$
|
(170,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2008
include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of
$120.0 million and interest expense on medium-term notes of
$0.8 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and
medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair
value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Income based on such instruments contractual
coupons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007, for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant to
|
|
|
|
Election of the Fair Value Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses and
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains and
|
|
|
Unrealized (Losses)
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense on
|
|
|
Interest Expense on
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
Deposits(1)
|
|
|
Notes Payable(1)
|
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
(298,641
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(298,641
|
)
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(298,641
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(298,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2007
include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of
$227.5 million and interest expense on medium-term notes of
$0.8 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and
medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair
value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Income based on such instruments contractual
coupons. |
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
(Year Ended December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
(Year Ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
(Year Ended December 31, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
Level 3 Instruments Only
|
|
Derivatives(1)
|
|
|
Sale(2)
|
|
|
Derivatives(1)
|
|
|
Sale(2)
|
|
|
Derivatives(1)
|
|
|
Sale(2)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
113,983
|
|
|
$
|
5,102
|
|
|
$
|
133,678
|
|
|
$
|
9,087
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
3,439
|
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
(4,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,407
|
)
|
New instruments acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,376
|
|
Principal repayments and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
4,199
|
|
|
$
|
84,354
|
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
113,983
|
|
|
$
|
5,102
|
|
|
$
|
133,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed
securities. |
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and
losses recorded in earnings for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 for Level 3 assets and
liabilities that are still held at the end of each year.
F-69
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Year Ended
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
(Year Ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
(Year Ended December 31, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
Level 3 Instruments Only
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
for Sale
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
for Sale
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
for Sale
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized losses relating to assets still held at
reporting date(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(440
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest income on investment securities
|
|
|
3,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities (credit component)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,439
|
|
|
$
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,342
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,985
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrealized losses of $2.6 million, $1.8 million and
$28.4 million on Level 3
available-for-sale
securities was recognized as part of other comprehensive income
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
Additionally, fair value is used on a no-recurring basis to
evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to
fair value usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market
accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of
cost or fair value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of
individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).
As of December 31, 2009, impairment or valuation
adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on
a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of
|
|
Losses Recorded for
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans receivable(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,103,069
|
|
|
$
|
144,024
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,304
|
|
|
|
8,419
|
|
Core deposit intangible(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
Loans held for sale(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The
impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the
collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for
specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific
characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. Losses are
related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer from
the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount represents core deposit intangible of First Bank Florida.
The impairment was generally measured based on internal
information about decreases in the base of core deposits
acquired upon the acquisition of First Bank Florida. |
|
(4) |
|
Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the
mortgage-backed securities market. |
F-70
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2008, impairment or valuation
adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on
a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of
|
|
Losses Recorded for
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans receivable(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,900
|
|
|
$
|
51,037
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,246
|
|
|
|
7,698
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The
impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the
collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for
specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific
characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. Valuation
allowance is based on market valuation adjustments after the
transfer from the loan to the OREO portfolio. |
As of December 31, 2007, impairment or valuation
adjustments were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on
a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses Recorded for
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of December 31, 2007
|
|
the Year Ended
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans receivable(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,187
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The
impairment was measured based on the fair value of the
collateral which was derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations. |
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for instruments for which an estimated fair value is
presented as well as for instruments for which the Corporation
has elected the fair value option. The estimated fair value was
calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which vary
depending on the specific financial instrument.
Cash and
due from banks and money market investments
The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks and money market
investments are reasonable estimates of their fair value. Money
market investments include
held-to-maturity
U.S. Government obligations, which have a contractual
maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these
securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets
that incorporate the risk of nonperformance.
Investment
securities available for sale and held to maturity
The fair value of investment securities is the market value
based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices
for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable
market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades,
quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads, bids offers and
reference data including market research operations. Observable
prices in the market already consider the risk of
nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not available,
fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due
to the limited market activity of the instrument, as is the case
with certain private
F-71
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
label mortgage-backed securities held by the Corporation. Refer
to Notes 1 and 4 for additional information about the fair
value of private label mortgage-backed securities.
Other
equity securities
Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available
fair value are stated at the net realizable value which
management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value.
This category is principally composed of stock that is owned by
the Corporation to comply with FHLB regulatory requirements.
Their realizable value equals their cost as these shares can be
freely redeemed at par.
Loans
receivable, including loans held for sale
The fair value of all loans was estimated using discounted cash
flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for
loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments
that the Corporations management believes a market
participant would consider in determining fair value. Loans were
classified by type such as commercial, residential mortgage,
credit cards and automobile. These asset categories were further
segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate categories. The fair
values of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans were
calculated by discounting expected cash flows through the
estimated maturity date. Loans with no stated maturity, like
credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment assumptions
were considered for non-residential loans. For residential
mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on prepayment
experiences of generic U.S. mortgage-backed securities
pools with similar characteristics (e.g. coupon and original
term) and adjusted based on the Corporations historical
data. Discount rates were based on the Treasury and LIBOR/Swap
Yield Curves at the date of the analysis, and included
appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and liquidity.
For impaired collateral dependent loans, the impairment was
primarily measured based on the fair value of the collateral,
which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration
prices in observable transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations.
Deposits
The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings
accounts, which are deposits with no defined maturities, equals
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For deposits
with stated maturities, but that reprice at least quarterly, the
fair value is also estimated to be the recorded amounts at the
reporting date.
The fair values of retail fixed-rate time deposits, with stated
maturities, are based on the present value of the future cash
flows expected to be paid on the deposits. The cash flows were
based on contractual maturities; no early repayments are
assumed. Discount rates were based on the LIBOR yield curve.
The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair
value of core deposit intangibles, which represent the value of
the customer relationship measured by the value of demand
deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of
interest and do not fluctuate in response to changes in interest
rates.
The fair value of brokered CDs, which are included within
deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over
the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a Hull-White
Interest Rate Tree approach, an industry-standard approach
for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The
fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding
principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar
LIBOR and swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of
nonperformance, since brokered CDs are generally participated
out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and insured by
the FDIC.
F-72
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loans
payable
Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED
Discount Window Program. Due to the short-term nature of these
borrowings, their outstanding balances are estimated to be the
fair value.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
Some repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their
outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Where
longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated using
exit price indications of the cost of unwinding the transactions
as of the end of the reporting period. Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by investment
securities.
Advances
from FHLB
The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is
determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full
term of the borrowings, using indications of the fair value of
similar transactions. The cash flows assume no early repayment
of the borrowings. Discount rates are based on the LIBOR yield
curve. For advances from FHLB that reprice quarterly, their
outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value.
Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans
and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.
Derivative
instruments
The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on
observable market parameters and takes into consideration the
credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate,
except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate
swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts is included in the
valuation; and on options and caps, only the sellers
credit risk is considered. The Hull-White Interest Rate
Tree approach is used to value the option components of
derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is
performed using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield
curves that account for the industry sector and the credit
rating of the counterparty
and/or the
Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for
protection against rising interest rates and, prior to
June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to economically
hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest
rate swaps, a credit component was not considered in the
valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized with
investment securities any mark to market loss with the
counterparty and, if there were market gains, the counterparty
had to deliver collateral to the Corporation.
Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case
with derivative instruments named as reference caps,
are valued using models that consider unobservable market
parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to
hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label
mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount
of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the
United States. Significant inputs used for fair value
determination consist of specific characteristics such as
information used in the prepayment model which follows the
amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an
unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula,
which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The
Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for
valuing stock options except that the spot price of the
underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula
uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates,
volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option
value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg
L.P. (Bloomberg) every day and build zero coupon
curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount
factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is
the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is reset at
the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at
the end of each period. The cash flow of each caplet is then
discounted from each payment date.
F-73
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Although most of the derivative instruments are fully
collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are
not secured in full. The cumulative
mark-to-market
effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments
resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately
$0.5 million as of December 31, 2009, of which an
unrealized loss of $1.9 million was recorded in 2009, an
unrealized gain of $1.5 million was recorded in 2008 and an
unrealized gain of $0.9 million was recorded in 2007.
Term
notes payable
The fair value of term notes is determined using a discounted
cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This
valuation also uses the Hull-White Interest Rate
Tree approach to value the option components of the term
notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised
economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed
using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used
in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. For
the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the
difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve
that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation
as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to
maturity of the note and option. The net loss from fair value
changes attributable to the Corporations own credit to the
medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair
value option amounted to $3.1 million for 2009, compared to
an unrealized gain of $4.1 million for 2008 and an
unrealized gain of $1.6 million for 2007. The cumulative
mark-to-market
unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since measured at fair
value attributable to credit risk amounted to $2.6 million
as of December 31, 2009.
Other
borrowings
Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures.
Projected cash flows from the debentures were discounted using
the LIBOR yield curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread
was estimated using the difference in yield curves between Swap
rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit
rating of the Corporation (US Finance BB) as issuer of the note
at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the debentures.
F-74
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 30
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
Supplemental cash flow information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings
|
|
$
|
494,628
|
|
|
$
|
687,668
|
|
|
$
|
721,545
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
7,391
|
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
10,142
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to other real estate owned
|
|
|
98,554
|
|
|
|
61,571
|
|
|
|
17,108
|
|
Additions to auto repossessions
|
|
|
80,568
|
|
|
|
87,116
|
|
|
|
104,728
|
|
Capitalization of servicing assets
|
|
|
6,072
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Loan securitizations
|
|
|
305,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recharacterization of secured commercial loans as securities
collateralized by loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,830
|
|
Non-cash acquisition of mortgage loans that previously served as
collateral of a commercial loan to a local financial institution
|
|
|
205,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 28, 2008, the Corporation completed the
acquisition of Virgin Islands Community Bank (VICB),
with operations in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, at
a purchase price of $2.5 million. The Corporation acquired
cash of approximately $7.7 million from VICB.
|
|
Note 31
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The following table presents a detail of commitments to extend
credit, standby letters of credit and commitments to sell loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit
risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To originate loans
|
|
$
|
255,598
|
|
|
$
|
518,281
|
|
Unused credit card lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Unused personal lines of credit
|
|
|
33,313
|
|
|
|
50,389
|
|
Commercial lines of credit
|
|
|
1,187,004
|
|
|
|
863,963
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
48,944
|
|
|
|
33,632
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
103,904
|
|
|
|
102,178
|
|
Commitments to sell loans
|
|
|
13,158
|
|
|
|
50,500
|
|
The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument on
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is
represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
Management uses the same credit policies and approval process in
entering into commitments and conditional obligations as it does
for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any conditions
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses. Since certain
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the
total
F-75
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the
Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to
additional disbursements. There have been no significant or
unexpected draws on existing commitments. In the case of credit
cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can, at any
time and without cause, cancel the unused credit facility.
Generally, the Corporations mortgage banking activities do
not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its
prospective borrowers. The amount of any collateral obtained if
deemed necessary by the Corporation upon an extension of credit
is based on managements credit evaluation of the borrower.
Rates charged on loans that are finally disbursed are the rates
being offered at the time the loans are closed; therefore, no
fee is charged on these commitments.
In general, commercial and standby letters of credit are issued
to facilitate foreign and domestic trade transactions. Normally,
commercial and standby letters of credit are short-term
commitments used to finance commercial contracts for the
shipment of goods. The collateral for these letters of credit
includes cash or available commercial lines of credit. The fair
value of commercial and standby letters of credit is based on
the fees currently charged for such agreements, which ,as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, was not significant.
The Corporation obtained from GNMA, Commitment Authority to
issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this program, as of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation had securitized
approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA mortgage loan
production into GNMA mortgage-backed securities.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate
swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed
to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation,
which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate
swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate
swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties
under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the
unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009
under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured
counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This
exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with
Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in
the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of
pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009
amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as
collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate
given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a
performance guarantee under the swap agreements, was not part of
a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never
transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate
swap agreements, Lehmans obligation was to return the
collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc.,
acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a
custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided
instructions to have most of the securities transferred to
Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal
to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month
of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays Capital
in federal court in New York demanding the return of the
securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons
to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are
no assurances that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation
against Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial
portion of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim
filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities
Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation
can provide no assurances that it will be successful in
recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through
these proceedings. An estimated loss was not accrued as the
Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim
resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a
substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value.
If additional relevant negative facts become available in future
periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this
claim may arise. Considering
F-76
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by
the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the
Corporation decided to classify such investments as
non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
|
|
Note 32
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate
risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates
will result in changes in the value of the Corporations
assets or liabilities and the risk that net interest income from
its loan and investment portfolios will change in response to
changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the
Corporations interest rate risk management activities is
to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in
interest rates.
The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including
derivatives, to manage the interest rate risk primarily related
to the values of its medium-term notes and for protection of
rising interest rates in connection with private label MBS.
The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge,
cash flow hedge or as an economic undesignated hedge when it
enters into the derivative contract. As of December 31,
2009 and 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were
considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated
hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or
loss recognized in current earnings.
The following summarizes the principal derivative activities
used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest
rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a
reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The
value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The
Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for
protection against rising interest rates. Specifically, the
interest rate on certain private label mortgage pass-through
securities and certain of the Corporations commercial
loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable
rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through
certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less
a contractual servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap
agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and
floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange
of the underlying notional principal amount. As of
December 31, 2009, most of the interest rate swaps
outstanding are used for protection against rising interest
rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher
since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs
(liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a
variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in
variable rate loans. However, most of these interest rate swaps
were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest rate
levels, and as a consequence the Corporation exercised its call
option on the
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising
from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest
rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or
interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is
being economically hedged.
Indexed options Indexed options are
generally
over-the-counter
(OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters into in order to
receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow
Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period
in exchange for a premium paid at the contracts inception.
The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of
the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index.
The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the
exchange party may not fulfill its obligation.
To satisfy the needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter
into non-hedging transactions. On these transactions, generally,
the Corporation participates as a buyer in one of the agreements
and as a seller in the other agreement under the same terms and
conditions.
F-77
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with
embedded derivatives that do not require separate accounting as
these are clearly and closely related to the economic
characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded
derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not
clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of
the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and
designated as a trading or non-hedging derivative instrument.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all
derivative instruments as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amounts
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Economic undesignated hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate brokered
CDs, notes payable and loans
|
|
$
|
79,567
|
|
|
$
|
1,184,820
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
102,521
|
|
|
|
128,043
|
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
228,384
|
|
|
|
276,400
|
|
Equity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes
payable
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on
embedded stock index options
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
517,502
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative
instruments and the location in the Statement of Financial
Condition as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Financial Condition
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Economic undesignated hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate brokered
CDs, notes payable and loans
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
5,649
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,068
|
|
|
$
|
7,188
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on
embedded stock index options
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
$
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,467
|
|
|
$
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative
instruments on the Statement of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on Derivatives
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ECONOMIC UNDESIGNATED HEDGES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs
|
|
Interest expense Deposits
|
|
$
|
(5,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
63,132
|
|
|
$
|
66,617
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
Interest expense Notes payable and other
borrowings
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Loans
|
|
Interest income Loans
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
(3,696
|
)
|
|
|
(2,653
|
)
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap
agreements mortgage-backed securities
|
|
Interest income Investment securities
|
|
|
3,394
|
|
|
|
(4,283
|
)
|
|
|
(3,546
|
)
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements
loans
|
|
Interest income loans
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
Equity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index deposits
|
|
Interest expense Deposits
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
Embedded written and purchased options on stock index notes
payable
|
|
Interest expense Notes payable and other
borrowings
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
55,211
|
|
|
$
|
61,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject
to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the
market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of
the financial markets expectations regarding the future
direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values
are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the
most part, on the shape of the yield curve, the level of
interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the
future. The unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of
derivatives that economically hedge certain callable brokered
CDs and medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized
gains and losses on the valuation of such economically hedged
liabilities measured at fair value. The Corporation includes the
gain or loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered
CDs and medium-term notes) in the same line item as the
offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set forth
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Gain on
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on
|
|
Liabilities Measured
|
|
Net
|
|
Gain on
|
|
Liabilities Measured
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
at Fair Value
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
at Fair Value
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest expense Deposits
|
|
$
|
(5,321
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,696
|
|
|
$
|
3,375
|
|
|
$
|
62,856
|
|
|
$
|
(54,199
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,657
|
|
Interest expense Notes payable and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
(3,221
|
)
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
4,557
|
|
A summary of interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2009
and 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount
|
|
$
|
79,567
|
|
|
$
|
81,575
|
|
Weighted-average receive rate at period end
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
Weighted-average pay rate at period end
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over
3-month LIBOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed/pay floating (generally used to economically hedge
fixed-rate brokered CDs and notes payable):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,103,244
|
|
Weighted-average receive rate at period end
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
Weighted-average pay rate at period end
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
F-80
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The changes in notional amount of interest rate swaps
outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Pay-fixed and receive-floating swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
82,932
|
|
Cancelled and matured contracts
|
|
|
(1,357
|
)
|
New contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
81,575
|
|
Cancelled and matured contracts
|
|
|
(2,008
|
)
|
New contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
79,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive-fixed and pay floating swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
4,161,541
|
|
Cancelled and matured contracts
|
|
|
(3,426,519
|
)
|
New contracts
|
|
|
368,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,103,244
|
|
Cancelled and matured contracts
|
|
|
(1,103,244
|
)
|
New contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first half of 2009, all of the $1.1 billion of
interest rate swaps that economically hedged brokered CDs that
were outstanding as of December 31, 2008 were called by the
counterparties, mainly due to lower levels of
3-month
LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps,
the Corporation exercised its call option on the approximately
$1.1 billion
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs. The Corporation recorded a net loss of
$3.5 million as a result of these transactions resulting
from the reversal of the cumulative
mark-to-market
valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has not entered
into any derivative instrument containing credit-risk-related
contingent features.
Credit
and Market Risk of Derivatives
The Corporation uses derivative instruments to manage interest
rate risk. By using derivative instruments, the Corporation is
exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty fails to
perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the
Corporations fair value gain in the derivative. When the
fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this
generally indicates that the counterparty owes the Corporation
and, therefore, creates a credit risk for the Corporation. When
the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative,
the Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore, it has no
credit risk. The Corporation minimizes the credit risk in
derivative instruments by entering into transactions with
reputable broker dealers (financial institutions) that are
reviewed periodically by the Corporations
Managements Investment and Asset Liability Committee
(MIALCO) and by the Board of Directors. The Corporation also
maintains a policy of requiring that all derivative instrument
contracts be governed by an International Swaps and Derivatives
Association Master Agreement, which includes a provision for
netting; most of the Corporations agreements with
derivative counterparties include bilateral collateral
arrangements. The bilateral collateral arrangement permits the
counterparties to perform margin calls in the form of cash or
securities in the event that the fair market value
F-81
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of the derivative favors either counterparty. The book value and
aggregate market value of securities pledged as collateral for
interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2008 was
$52.5 million and $54.2 million, respectively (2008
$93.2 million and $91.7 million,
respectively). The Corporation has a policy of diversifying
derivatives counterparties to reduce the risk that any
counterparty will default.
The Corporation has credit risk of $5.9 million
(2008 $8.0 million) related to derivative
instruments with positive fair values. The credit risk does not
consider the value of any collateral and the effects of legally
enforceable master netting agreements. There was a loss of
approximately $1.4 million, related to a counterparty that
failed to pay a scheduled net cash settlement in 2008 (refer to
Note 31 for additional information). There were no credit
losses associated with derivative instruments recognized in 2009
or 2007. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had a
total net interest settlement payable of $0.3 million
(2008 net interest settlement receivable of
$4.1 million) related to the swap transactions. The net
settlements receivable and net settlements payable on interest
rate swaps are included as part of Other Assets and
Accounts payable and other liabilities,
respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition.
Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest
rates or implied volatility rates has on the value of a
financial instrument. The Corporation manages the market risk
associated with interest rate contracts by establishing and
monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be
undertaken.
The Corporations derivative activities are monitored by
the MIALCO as part of its risk-management oversight of the
Corporations treasury functions.
|
|
Note 33
|
Segment
Information
|
Based upon the Corporations organizational structure and
the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the
operating segments are driven primarily by the
Corporations lines of business for its operations in
Puerto Rico, the Corporations principal market, and by
geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As
of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had six reportable
segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking;
Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United
States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management
determined the reportable segments based on the internal
reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to
allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporations
organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution
channels and the economic characteristics of the products were
also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation has
realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views
and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were
created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation,
outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United
States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated
as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment
reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring
initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida
operations with and into FirstBank, and will allow the
Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus.
Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were
driven primarily by the Corporations legal entities.
FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through
its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in
the Corporations then four reportable segments (Commercial
and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail)
Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations
conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a
category named Other. In the third quarter of 2009,
as a result of the aforementioned merger, the operations of
FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable
segments. The change in the fourth quarter reflected a further
realignment of the organizational structure as a result of
management changes. Prior period amounts have been reclassified
to conform to current period presentation. These changes did not
have an impact on the previously reported consolidated results
of the Corporation.
F-82
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the
Corporations lending and other services for large
customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients
and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real
estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash
management and business management services. The Mortgage
Banking segments operations consist of the origination,
sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans.
The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages
in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking
segment includes mortgage loans purchased from other local banks
and mortgage bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment
consists of the Corporations consumer lending and
deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch
network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment
is responsible for the Corporations investment portfolio
and treasury functions executed to manage and enhance liquidity.
This segment lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate
Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments
to finance their lending activities and borrows from those
segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also lends funds
to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by
Treasury and Investments and the Consumer (Retail) Banking
segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference
between the allocated interest income or expense and the
Corporations actual net interest income from centralized
management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and
Investments segment. The United States operations segment
consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the
United States mainland, including commercial and retail banking
services. The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all
banking activities conducted by the Corporation in the
U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including commercial and
retail banking services and insurance activities.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in Note 1 Nature of Business
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based
on net interest income, the estimated provision for loan and
lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest
expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average
volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for
loan and lease losses.
The following table presents information about the reportable
segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
|
Treasury and
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
(Retail) Banking
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
156,729
|
|
|
$
|
210,102
|
|
|
$
|
239,399
|
|
|
$
|
251,949
|
|
|
$
|
67,936
|
|
|
$
|
70,459
|
|
|
$
|
996,574
|
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
|
|
|
(117,486
|
)
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(59,080
|
)
|
|
|
176,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(342,161
|
)
|
|
|
(65,360
|
)
|
|
|
(9,350
|
)
|
|
|
(477,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
39,243
|
|
|
|
149,646
|
|
|
|
180,319
|
|
|
|
86,149
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
61,109
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(29,717
|
)
|
|
|
(62,457
|
)
|
|
|
(273,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188,651
|
)
|
|
|
(25,211
|
)
|
|
|
(579,858
|
)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
8,497
|
|
|
|
32,003
|
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
84,369
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
10,240
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses
|
|
|
(32,314
|
)
|
|
|
(98,263
|
)
|
|
|
(41,948
|
)
|
|
|
(7,416
|
)
|
|
|
(37,704
|
)
|
|
|
(45,364
|
)
|
|
|
(263,009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(14,291
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,929
|
|
|
$
|
(129,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
163,102
|
|
|
$
|
(222,319
|
)
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
(181,561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets
|
|
$
|
2,654,504
|
|
|
$
|
2,109,602
|
|
|
$
|
5,974,950
|
|
|
$
|
5,831,078
|
|
|
$
|
1,449,878
|
|
|
$
|
996,508
|
|
|
$
|
19,016,520
|
|
F-83
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
|
Treasury and
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
(Retail) Banking
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
156,577
|
|
|
$
|
225,474
|
|
|
$
|
287,708
|
|
|
$
|
288,063
|
|
|
$
|
95,043
|
|
|
$
|
74,032
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,897
|
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
|
|
|
(119,257
|
)
|
|
|
3,573
|
|
|
|
(175,454
|
)
|
|
|
291,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(455,802
|
)
|
|
|
(66,204
|
)
|
|
|
(14,009
|
)
|
|
|
(599,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
37,320
|
|
|
|
166,046
|
|
|
|
112,254
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
|
|
28,839
|
|
|
|
60,023
|
|
|
|
527,881
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(8,997
|
)
|
|
|
(80,506
|
)
|
|
|
(35,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,406
|
)
|
|
|
(12,535
|
)
|
|
|
(190,948
|
)
|
Non-interest income (loss)
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
35,531
|
|
|
|
4,591
|
|
|
|
25,577
|
|
|
|
(3,570
|
)
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
|
|
74,643
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses
|
|
|
(22,703
|
)
|
|
|
(99,232
|
)
|
|
|
(24,467
|
)
|
|
|
(6,713
|
)
|
|
|
(34,236
|
)
|
|
|
(48,105
|
)
|
|
|
(235,456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,287
|
|
|
$
|
21,839
|
|
|
$
|
56,874
|
|
|
$
|
142,263
|
|
|
$
|
(62,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,230
|
|
|
$
|
176,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets
|
|
$
|
2,492,566
|
|
|
$
|
2,185,888
|
|
|
$
|
5,086,787
|
|
|
$
|
5,583,181
|
|
|
$
|
1,515,418
|
|
|
$
|
942,052
|
|
|
$
|
17,805,892
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
133,068
|
|
|
$
|
238,874
|
|
|
$
|
335,625
|
|
|
$
|
284,155
|
|
|
$
|
121,897
|
|
|
$
|
75,628
|
|
|
$
|
1,189,247
|
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
|
|
|
(105,459
|
)
|
|
|
(794
|
)
|
|
|
(230,777
|
)
|
|
|
370,451
|
|
|
|
(33,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(608,119
|
)
|
|
|
(49,734
|
)
|
|
|
(16,571
|
)
|
|
|
(738,231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
27,609
|
|
|
|
174,273
|
|
|
|
104,848
|
|
|
|
46,487
|
|
|
|
38,742
|
|
|
|
59,057
|
|
|
|
451,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(1,643
|
)
|
|
|
(73,799
|
)
|
|
|
(12,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,174
|
)
|
|
|
(2,529
|
)
|
|
|
(120,610
|
)
|
Non-interest income (loss)
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
32,529
|
|
|
|
3,737
|
|
|
|
(2,161
|
)
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
12,188
|
|
|
|
49,584
|
|
Net gain on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of
secured commercial loans to a local financial institution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses
|
|
|
(20,890
|
)
|
|
|
(95,169
|
)
|
|
|
(20,056
|
)
|
|
|
(7,842
|
)
|
|
|
(21,848
|
)
|
|
|
(42,407
|
)
|
|
|
(208,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
$
|
37,834
|
|
|
$
|
78,561
|
|
|
$
|
36,484
|
|
|
$
|
(12,113
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,309
|
|
|
$
|
174,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets
|
|
$
|
2,140,647
|
|
|
$
|
2,207,447
|
|
|
$
|
4,363,149
|
|
|
$
|
5,400,648
|
|
|
$
|
1,561,029
|
|
|
$
|
895,434
|
|
|
$
|
16,568,354
|
|
F-84
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable
segment financial information to the consolidated totals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income for segments and other
|
|
$
|
(181,561
|
)
|
|
$
|
176,120
|
|
|
$
|
174,275
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(89,092
|
)
|
|
|
(97,915
|
)
|
|
|
(99,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(270,653
|
)
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
89,719
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets for segments
|
|
$
|
19,016,520
|
|
|
$
|
17,805,892
|
|
|
$
|
16,568,354
|
|
Average non-earning assets
|
|
|
790,702
|
|
|
|
702,064
|
|
|
|
645,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated average assets
|
|
$
|
19,807,222
|
|
|
$
|
18,507,956
|
|
|
$
|
17,214,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents revenues and selected balance sheet
data by geography based on the location in which the transaction
is originated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico(1)
|
|
$
|
988,743
|
|
|
$
|
1,026,188
|
|
|
$
|
1,045,523
|
|
United States
|
|
|
69,396
|
|
|
|
91,473
|
|
|
|
123,064
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
80,699
|
|
|
|
83,879
|
|
|
|
87,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated revenues
|
|
$
|
1,138,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,201,540
|
|
|
$
|
1,256,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Balance Sheet Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
$
|
16,843,767
|
|
|
$
|
16,824,168
|
|
|
$
|
14,633,217
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,716,694
|
|
|
|
1,619,280
|
|
|
|
1,540,808
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
1,067,987
|
|
|
|
1,047,820
|
|
|
|
1,012,906
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
$
|
11,614,866
|
|
|
$
|
10,601,488
|
|
|
$
|
9,413,118
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,275,869
|
|
|
|
1,484,011
|
|
|
|
1,448,613
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
1,058,491
|
|
|
|
1,002,793
|
|
|
|
938,015
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
$
|
10,497,646
|
|
|
$
|
10,746,688
|
|
|
$
|
8,776,874
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,252,977
|
|
|
|
1,243,754
|
|
|
|
1,239,913
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
918,424
|
|
|
|
1,066,988
|
|
|
|
1,017,734
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2007, Revenues of Puerto Rico operations include
$15.1 million related to reimbursement of expenses, mainly
from insurance carriers, related to a class action lawsuit
settled in 2007. |
F-85
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2009, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries
were defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations financial position or results
of operations.
|
|
Note 35
|
First
BanCorp (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
|
The following condensed financial information presents the
financial position of the Holding Company only as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its
operations and cash flows for the years ended on
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Statements
of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
55,423
|
|
|
$
|
58,075
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Investment in First Bank Puerto Rico, at equity
|
|
|
1,754,217
|
|
|
|
1,574,940
|
|
Investment in First Bank Insurance Agency, at equity
|
|
|
6,709
|
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
Investment in Ponce General Corporation, at equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,367
|
|
Investment in PR Finance, at equity
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
|
|
2,789
|
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,831,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,780,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
$
|
231,959
|
|
|
$
|
231,914
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
232,628
|
|
|
|
232,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
1,548,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,831,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,780,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-86
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Statements
of (Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on investment securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
727
|
|
|
$
|
3,029
|
|
Interest income on other investments
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
Interest income on loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Dividend from First Bank Puerto Rico
|
|
|
46,562
|
|
|
|
81,852
|
|
|
|
79,135
|
|
Dividend from other subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,096
|
|
|
|
88,131
|
|
|
|
85,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
13,947
|
|
|
|
18,942
|
|
Interest on funding to subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
(Recovery) provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,013
|
|
|
|
15,060
|
|
|
|
26,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on investments and impairments
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
|
(6,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of
secured commercial loans to a local financial institution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed
(losses) earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
36,695
|
|
|
|
71,247
|
|
|
|
51,394
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(543
|
)
|
|
|
(1,714
|
)
|
Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(311,876
|
)
|
|
|
39,233
|
|
|
|
18,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
109,937
|
|
|
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(30,896
|
)
|
|
|
82,653
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(306,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
192,590
|
|
|
$
|
73,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-87
FIRST
BANCORP
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,937
|
|
|
$
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Recovery) provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
Stock-based compensation recognized
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses (earnings) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
311,876
|
|
|
|
(39,233
|
)
|
|
|
(18,456
|
)
|
Net loss on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
Loss on impairment of investment securities
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
Net loss on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of
secured commercial loans to a local financial institution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Accretion of discount on investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Net decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
(3,542
|
)
|
|
|
52,515
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(72,639
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
315,593
|
|
|
|
(41,587
|
)
|
|
|
(27,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
40,406
|
|
|
|
68,350
|
|
|
|
40,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution to subsidiaries
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|
|
(37,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, principal repayments and maturity of
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
11,403
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|
|
(32,209
|
)
|
|
|
13,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from purchased funds and other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of purchased funds and other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
(5,800
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,924
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(43,066
|
)
|
|
|
(66,181
|
)
|
|
|
(64,881
|
)
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
356,942
|
|
|
|
(67,578
|
)
|
|
|
21,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,652
|
)
|
|
|
(31,437
|
)
|
|
|
74,928
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
58,375
|
|
|
|
89,812
|
|
|
|
14,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
$
|
55,723
|
|
|
$
|
58,375
|
|
|
$
|
89,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due form banks
|
|
|
55,423
|
|
|
|
58,075
|
|
|
|
43,519
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
46,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,723
|
|
|
$
|
58,375
|
|
|
$
|
89,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-88
Exhibit D
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarter ended March 31, 2010
D-1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31,
2010
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS
SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0561882
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
|
|
|
|
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
00908
(Zip Code)
|
(787) 729-8200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Not
applicable
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
Common stock: 92,542,722 outstanding as of April 30, 2010.
FIRST
BANCORP.
INDEX
PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
2
Forward
Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in
this
Form 10-Q
or future filings by First BanCorp (the Corporation)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
in the Corporations press releases, in other public or
stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the
approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases
would be, will allow, intends
to, will likely result, are expected
to, should, anticipate and similar
expressions are meant to identify forward-looking
statements.
First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue
reliance on any such forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date made, and represent First
BanCorps expectations of future conditions or results and
are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises
readers that various factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but
are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about whether the Corporations actions to
improve its capital structure will have their intended effect;
|
|
|
|
the risk of being subject to possible regulatory action;
|
|
|
|
the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the
consumer and commercial credit sector and their impact on the
credit quality of the Corporations loans and other assets,
including the Corporations construction and commercial
real estate loan portfolios, which have contributed and may
continue to contribute to, among other things, the increase in
the levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the
provision expense;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United
States and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate scenario,
market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices
and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may
reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect
demand for all of the Corporations products and services
and the value of the Corporations assets, including the
value of derivative instruments used for protection from
interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
the Corporations reliance on brokered certificates of
deposit and its ability to continue to rely on the issuance of
brokered certificates of deposit to fund operations and provide
liquidity;
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in the Corporations ability to attract
new clients and retain existing ones;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for the Corporations products and
services and lower revenues and earnings because of the
continued recession in Puerto Rico, the recently announced
consolidation of the banking industry in Puerto Rico and the
current fiscal problems and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico
government;
|
|
|
|
a need to recognize additional impairments of financial
instruments or goodwill relating to acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for
financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States
and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could affect
the Corporations financial performance and could cause the
Corporations actual results for future periods to differ
materially from prior results and anticipated or projected
results;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions
undertaken to stimulate the U.S. economy and stabilize the
U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may
have on the Corporations business, financial condition and
results of operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of
the federal government, including those determined by the
Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve), the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in
Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit
insurance premium
and/or
require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund,
causing an additional increase in our non-interest expense;
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to generate sufficient income to realize
the benefit of the deferred tax asset;
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman
Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
changes in the Corporations expenses associated with
acquisitions and dispositions;
|
|
|
|
developments in technology;
|
|
|
|
the impact of Doral Financial Corporations financial
condition on the repayment of its outstanding secured loans to
the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings
of the Corporations securities;
|
|
|
|
general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and
|
|
|
|
the possible future dilution to holders of our Common Stock
resulting from additional issuances of Common Stock or
securities convertible into Common Stock.
|
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims
any obligation, to update any of the forward- looking
statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events
or circumstances after the date of such statements except as
required by the federal securities laws.
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as well as
Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and
uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
4
FIRST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
for share information)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
675,551
|
|
|
$
|
679,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
22,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged
|
|
|
2,401,098
|
|
|
|
3,021,028
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
1,069,890
|
|
|
|
1,149,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged
|
|
|
408,786
|
|
|
|
400,925
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
156,145
|
|
|
|
200,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of
$590,322 (2009 $621,584)
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
601,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $575,303
(2009 $528,120)
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
|
|
13,400,331
|
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
|
|
197,965
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
69,304
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
|
|
79,867
|
|
Due from customers on acceptances
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
Accounts receivable from investment sales
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
312,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
|
$
|
697,022
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
11,972,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
3,076,631
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
978,440
|
|
Notes payable (including $14,319 and $13,361 measured at fair
value as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively)
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
27,117
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
Bank acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
145,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
18,029,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and
outstanding 22,404,000 shares at an aggregate liquidation
value of $950,100
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
928,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized
250,000,000 shares; issued 102,440,522 as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding, 92,542,722 as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,247
|
|
|
|
134,223
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
118,291
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax expense of
$5,356 (2009 $4,628)
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholdersequity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholdersequity
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
FIRST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
177,433
|
|
|
$
|
187,945
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
43,119
|
|
|
|
70,287
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
258,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
65,966
|
|
|
|
95,310
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
|
25,282
|
|
|
|
30,145
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
8,292
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
136,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
121,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
59,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income after provision for loan and lease
losses
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
62,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service charges on loans
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
1,529
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,165
|
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Net gain on sales of investments and impairments on equity
securities
|
|
|
30,764
|
|
|
|
17,450
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
|
6,838
|
|
|
|
6,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
30,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expeses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits
|
|
|
31,728
|
|
|
|
34,242
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
14,774
|
|
Business promotion
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
3,186
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
Insurance and supervisory fees
|
|
|
18,518
|
|
|
|
6,672
|
|
Net loss on real estate owned (REO) operations
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
Other non-interest expenses
|
|
|
11,259
|
|
|
|
13,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
84,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(100,138
|
)
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
|
|
|
6,152
|
|
|
|
15,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
FIRST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) income
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,171
|
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
Amortization and impairment of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
4,713
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
59,429
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
(13,302
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation recognized
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Gain on sale of investments, net
|
|
|
(31,364
|
)
|
|
|
(17,838
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments on investment securities
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
Derivatives instruments and hedging activities loss (gain)
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
(11,246
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(1,183
|
)
|
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on deferred loan fees
and costs
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(4,385
|
)
|
|
|
(16,339
|
)
|
Amortization of broker placement fees
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
Net amortization of premium and discounts on investment
securities
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued income tax payable
|
|
|
2,384
|
|
|
|
(1,907
|
)
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
|
16,906
|
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(13,814
|
)
|
Decrease in other assets
|
|
|
13,208
|
|
|
|
38,979
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
12,659
|
|
|
|
(7,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
190,296
|
|
|
|
52,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
83,297
|
|
|
|
74,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on loans
|
|
|
1,050,262
|
|
|
|
668,786
|
|
Loans originated
|
|
|
(565,515
|
)
|
|
|
(1,182,123
|
)
|
Purchase of loans
|
|
|
(41,893
|
)
|
|
|
(51,053
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
|
|
|
19,064
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets
|
|
|
19,575
|
|
|
|
15,319
|
|
Proceeds from sale of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
393,433
|
|
|
|
191,167
|
|
Purchase of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(99,867
|
)
|
|
|
(564,771
|
)
|
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of securities
held to maturity
|
|
|
35,998
|
|
|
|
255,583
|
|
Proceeds from principal repayments of securities available for
sale
|
|
|
423,747
|
|
|
|
232,343
|
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
(6,278
|
)
|
|
|
(13,974
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities
|
|
|
5,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,773
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
1,234,128
|
|
|
|
(466,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
203,321
|
|
|
|
(1,430,620
|
)
|
Net (decrease) increase in loans payable
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
935,000
|
|
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold
under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(576,631
|
)
|
|
|
(247,262
|
)
|
Net FHLB advances (paid) taken
|
|
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,161
|
)
|
Issuance of preferred stock and associated warrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(691,310
|
)
|
|
|
118,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
626,115
|
|
|
|
(273,595
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
704,084
|
|
|
|
405,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,330,199
|
|
|
$
|
132,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
675,551
|
|
|
$
|
107,414
|
|
Money market instruments
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
24,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,330,199
|
|
|
$
|
132,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
7
FIRST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Preferred Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
928,508
|
|
|
$
|
550,100
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock Series F
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Preferred stock discount Series F
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,820
|
)
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount Series F
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
925,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In-Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
134,223
|
|
|
|
108,299
|
|
Issuance of common stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,820
|
|
Stock-based compensation recognized
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
134,247
|
|
|
|
134,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
118,291
|
|
|
|
440,777
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
21,891
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,483
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,681
|
)
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount Series F
|
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
443,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,545
|
)
|
|
|
25,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
82,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,977,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
8
FIRST
BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
|
|
|
17,529
|
|
|
|
43,304
|
|
Reclassification adjustments for net gain included in net income
|
|
|
(20,696
|
)
|
|
|
(17,838
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustments for
other-than-temporary
impairment on equity securities
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income for the period, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,545
|
)
|
|
|
25,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(110,544
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
9
FIRST
BANCORP
PART I
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been
prepared in conformity with the accounting policies stated in
the Corporations Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
included in the Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Certain information
and note disclosures normally included in the financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America
(GAAP) have been condensed or omitted from these
statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and,
accordingly, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009,
included in the Corporations 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary
for a fair presentation of the statement of financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods
have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The results of operations for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the entire year.
Capital
and Liquidity
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a
going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of
business for the foreseeable future. Sustained weak economic
conditions that have severely affected Puerto Rico and the
United States over the last several years have adversely
impacted First BanCorps results of operations and capital
levels. The net loss in 2009, primarily related to credit
losses, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and an
increase in the deposit insurance premium, reduced the
Corporations capital levels during 2009. The net loss for
the first quarter of 2010 was primarily related to credit losses
and the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. While
regulatory capital ratios were not significantly impacted during
the first quarter of 2010 as they were in 2009, the tangible
common equity ratio, which is an important measure to investors,
debt rating agencies, and others, continued to decrease,
impacted by the net loss for the quarter. The tangible common
equity ratio decreased from 3.20% as of December 31, 2009
to 2.74% as of March 31, 2010. The decrease in regulatory
capital ratios during the first quarter was not significant
since the net loss reported for the quarter was almost entirely
offset by the decrease in risk-weighted assets, consistent with
the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet
to fortify its capital position. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporations Total and Tier 1 capital ratios of
13.26% and 11.98%, respectively, exceeded the minimum
requirements to qualify as well-capitalized of 10%
and 6%, respectively.
Although as of March 31, 2010 the amounts of the
Corporations and its subsidiary banks capital
exceeded the minimum amounts required for them to qualify as
well capitalized for regulatory purposes, the
Corporation must increase its common equity to provide
additional protection from the possibility that, due to the
current economic situation in Puerto Rico that has impacted the
Corporations asset quality and earnings performance, First
BanCorp could have to recognize additional loan loss reserves
against its loan portfolio and absorb the potential future
credit losses associated with the disposition of non-performing
assets. Total non-performing loans to total loans increased to
12.35% as of March 31, 2010 from 11.23% as of
December 31, 2009 and from 5.27% a year ago. The
Corporation has assured its regulators that it is committed to
raising capital and is actively pursuing capital strengthening
initiatives. Management is taking steps to implement various
strategies to increase tangible common equity and regulatory
capital through (1) the issuance of approximately
$500 million of equity in one or more private offerings;
(2) a rights offering to existing stockholders; (3) an
offer to issue shares of common stock in exchange for its
publicly-held preferred stock; and (4) an offer to issue
shares of common stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for
the preferred stock it
10
acquired under the Capital Purchase Program. In 2009, the
Corporation suspended its dividends to common and preferred
shareholders until such time as the Corporation returns to
profitability.
The Corporation has maintained its basic surplus (cash,
short-term assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured
lines of credit) well in excess of the self-imposed minimum
limit of 5% of total assets. As of March 31, 2010, the
estimated basic surplus ratio of approximately 12% included
un-pledged investment securities, FHLB lines of credit, and
cash. The Corporation decided to further increase its liquidity
levels in 2010 due to potential disruptions from the
consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking industry and volumes.
Subsequent to the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking
industry that took place on April 30, 2010, no disruptions
have been noted. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporations liquidity was significantly higher than
normalized levels as reflected in the period-end cash and cash
equivalents balance of $1.3 billion, an increase of
$626 million since December 2009 and well in excess of
historical average balances of approximately $450 million
over the last three years.
The Corporation is in the process of deleveraging its balance
sheet by reducing the amounts of brokered CDs and borrowings
from the FED. Such reductions are being partly offset by
increases in retail and business deposits. At least
$500 million of brokered CDs outstanding at the beginning
of the year will not be renewed. The $600 million in
advances from the FED outstanding as of March 31, 2010, are
expected to be re-paid on or before June 30, 2010. At the
same time as the Corporation focuses on reducing its reliance on
brokered deposits, it is seeking to add core deposits and
pursuing other growth opportunities.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation and its
subsidiary bank received credit rating downgrades from
Moodys (Ba2 to B1), Standard and Poors (BB+ to B), and
Fitch (BB to B). Furthermore, on April 27, 2010, Standard
and Poors placed the Corporation on Credit Watch
Negative. The Corporation does not have any outstanding
debt or derivative agreements that are affected by credit
downgrades. Given our current non-reliance on corporate debt or
other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or volume
to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation so far has
also not been affected in any material way by the downgrades.
The Corporations ability to access new external sources of
funding, however, will be adversely affected by these credit
ratings and any additional downgrades.
Given the Corporations asset quality and earnings
performance, we expect our regulators to require the Corporation
to raise capital within a specified time frame to maintain the
regulatory ratios at levels above the minimum amounts required
for well capitalized banks. Based on current
liquidity needs and sources, management expects First BanCorp to
be able to meet its obligations for a reasonable period of time.
If the Corporation is not able to execute its plans discussed
above and increase its capital in the near term, management
believes that is likely that our regulators could require us to
execute certain informal or formal written regulatory agreements
that could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operations, financial condition or results of operations and the
value of our common stock and require the Corporation to seek a
waiver to continue to issue brokered CDs, even at a reduced
level.
Adoption
of new accounting requirements and recently issued but not yet
effective accounting requirements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
issued the following accounting pronouncements and guidance
relevant to the Corporations operations:
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
accounting for transfers of financial assets, to improve the
relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its
financial statements about a transfer of financial assets, the
effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows, and a transferors continuing
involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This
guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting
entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first
annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting
periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the FASB
amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among the
most significant changes and additions to this guidance are
changes to the conditions for sales of a financial asset based
on whether a transferor and its consolidated affiliates included
in the financial
11
statements have surrendered control over the transferred
financial asset or third party beneficial interest; and the
addition of the term participating interest, which represents a
proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The Corporation adopted the guidance with no
material impact on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the
consolidation of variable interests to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities and address (i) the effects on certain provisions
of the amended guidance, as a result of the elimination of the
qualifying special-purpose entity concept in the accounting for
transfer of financial assets guidance, and (ii) constituent
concerns about the application of certain key provisions of the
guidance, including those in which the accounting and
disclosures do not always provide timely and useful information
about an enterprises involvement in a variable interest
entity. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each
reporting entitys first annual reporting period that
begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within
that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. Subsequently in December 2009, the
FASB amended the existing guidance issued in June 2009. Among
the most significant changes and additions to the guidance is
the replacement of the quantitative based risks and rewards
calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has
a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity
with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity
has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest
entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or
the right to receive benefits from the entity. The Corporation
adopted the guidance with no material impact on its financial
statements.
In January 2010, the FASB updated the Accounting Standards
Codification (Codification) to provide guidance to
improve disclosure requirements related to fair value
measurements and require reporting entities to make new
disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value
measurements including significant transfers into and out of
Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and
information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a
gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value
measurements. Currently, entities are only required to disclose
activity in Level 3 measurements in the fair-value
hierarchy on a net basis. The FASB also clarified existing
fair-value measurement disclosure guidance about the level of
disaggregation, inputs, and valuation techniques. Entities are
required to separately disclose significant transfers into and
out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements in the
fair-value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers.
Significance will be determined based on earnings and total
assets or total liabilities or, when changes in fair value are
recognized in other comprehensive income, based on total equity.
A reporting entity must disclose and consistently follow its
policy for determining when transfers between levels are
recognized. Acceptable methods for determining when to recognize
transfers include: (i) actual date of the event or change
in circumstances causing the transfer; (ii) beginning of
the reporting period; and (iii) end of the reporting
period. The guidance requires disclosure of fair-value
measurements by class instead of major
category. A class is generally a subset of assets and
liabilities within a financial statement line item and is based
on the specific nature and risks of the assets and liabilities
and their classification in the fair-value hierarchy. When
determining classes, reporting entities must also consider the
level of disaggregated information required by other applicable
GAAP. For fair-value measurements using significant observable
inputs (Level 2) or significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3), this guidance requires reporting entities to
disclose the valuation technique and the inputs used in
determining fair value for each class of assets and liabilities.
If the valuation technique has changed in the reporting period
(e.g., from a market approach to an income approach) or if an
additional valuation technique is used, entities are required to
disclose the change and the reason for making the change. Except
for the detailed Level 3 roll forward disclosures, the
guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009 (first quarter of 2010
for public companies with calendar year-ends). The new
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
in the roll forward activity for Level 3 fair value
measurements are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2010 (first quarter of
2011 for public companies with calendar year-ends). Early
adoption is permitted. In the initial adoption period, entities
are not required to include disclosures for previous comparative
periods; however, they are required for periods ending after
initial
12
adoption. The Corporation adopted the guidance in the first
quarter of 2010 and required disclosures are presented in
Note 19 Fair Value.
In February 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
guidance to improve disclosure requirements related to the
recognition and disclosure of subsequent events. The amendment
establishes that an entity that either (a) is an SEC filer
or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt
securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or
foreign stock exchange or an
over-the-counter
market, including local or regional markets) is required to
evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial
statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those
criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the
date the financial statements are available to be issued. An
entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. Also, the
scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to
include revised financial statements only. Revised financial
statements include financial statements revised either as a
result of the correction of an error or retrospective
application of U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The guidance in this update was effective on the
date of issuance in February. The Corporation has adopted this
guidance; refer to Note 24 Subsequent events.
In February 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
guidance on the deferral of consolidation requirements for a
reporting entitys interest in an entity (1) that has
all the attributes of an investment company or (2) for
which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles
for financial reporting purposes that are consistent with those
followed by investment companies. The deferral does not apply in
situations in which a reporting entity has the explicit or
implicit obligation to fund losses of an entity that could
potentially be significant to the entity. The deferral also does
not apply to interests in securitization entities, asset-backed
financing entities, or entities formerly considered qualifying
special purpose entities. In addition, the deferral applies to a
reporting entitys interest in an entity that is required
to comply or operate in accordance with requirements similar to
those in
Rule 2a-7
of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money
market funds. An entity that qualifies for the deferral will
continue to be assessed under the overall guidance on the
consolidation of variable interest entities. The guidance also
clarifies that for entities that do not qualify for the
deferral, related parties should be considered for determining
whether a decision maker or service provider fee represents a
variable interest. In addition, the requirements for evaluating
whether a decision makers or service providers fee
is a variable interest are modified to clarify the FASBs
intention that a quantitative calculation should not be the sole
basis for this evaluation. The guidance is effective for interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after November 15,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact in
the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
In March 2010, the FASB updated the Codification to provide
clarification on the scope exception related to embedded credit
derivatives related to the transfer of credit risk in the form
of subordination of one financial instrument to another. The
transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of
subordination of one financial instrument to another (thereby
redistributing credit risk) is an embedded derivative feature
that should not be subject to potential bifurcation and separate
accounting. The amendments address how to determine which
embedded credit derivative features, including those in
collateralized debt obligations and synthetic collateralized
debt obligations, are considered to be embedded derivatives that
should not be analyzed under this guidance. The Corporation may
elect the fair value option for any investment in a beneficial
interest in a securitized financial asset. The guidance is
effective for the first fiscal quarter beginning after
June 15, 2010. The Corporation is currently evaluating the
impact, if any, of the adoption of this guidance on its
financial statements.
13
|
|
2
|
EARNINGS
PER COMMON SHARE
|
The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters
ended on March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,891
|
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends(1)
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
(14,236
|
)
|
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion
|
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
Average potential common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2010 and 2009 includes $5.0 and $2.6 million,
respectively, of Series F cummulative preferred stock
dividends that have not been declared at period-end. Refer to
Note 17 for additional information related to the
Series F preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in
connection with the Troubled Asset Relief
Program(TARP)Capital Purchase Program. |
(Loss) earnings per common share are computed by dividing net
(loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted average common shares issued and outstanding. Net
(loss) income attributable to common stockholders represents net
(loss) income adjusted for preferred stock dividends including
dividends declared, accretion of discount on preferred stock
issuances and cumulative dividends related to the current
dividend period that have not been declared as of the end of the
period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding exclude
unvested shares of restricted stock.
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under
the assumed exercise of stock options, unvested shares of
restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury
stock method. This method assumes that the potential common
shares are issued and the proceeds from the exercise, in
addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to
future services, are used to purchase common stock at the
exercise date. The difference between the number of potential
shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental
shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute
diluted earnings per share. Stock options, unvested shares of
restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower
potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury
stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive
earnings per share since their inclusion would have an
antidilutive effect on earnings per share. For the period ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, there were 2,455,310 and
3,910,610, respectively, outstanding stock options, as well as
warrants outstanding to purchase 5,842,259 shares of common
stock related to the TARP Capital Purchase Program that were
excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common
share because the Corporation reported a net loss attributable
to common stockholders for the period and their inclusion would
have an antidilutive effect. Approximately 21,477 and 32, 216
unvested shares of restricted stock outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 and 2009 were excluded from the computation
of earnings per share.
14
Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock
option plan (the 1997 stock option plan) that
authorized the granting of up to 8,696,112 options on shares of
the Corporations common stock to eligible employees. The
options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the
number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for
the purchase of one share of common stock at a price not less
than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option
was granted. Stock options were fully vested upon grant. The
maximum term to exercise the options is ten years. The stock
option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the
exercise price and the number of shares that can be purchased in
the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reclassification of
stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and
distributions such as stock appreciation rights.
Under the 1997 stock option plan, the Compensation and Benefits
Committee (the Compensation Committee) had the
authority to grant stock appreciation rights at any time
subsequent to the grant of an option. Pursuant to stock
appreciation rights, the optionee surrenders the right to
exercise an option granted under the plan in consideration for
payment by the Corporation of an amount equal to the excess of
the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to
such option surrendered over the total option price of such
shares. Any option surrendered is cancelled by the Corporation
and the shares subject to the option are not eligible for
further grants under the option plan. On January 21, 2007,
the 1997 stock option plan expired; all outstanding awards
granted under this plan continue in full force and effect,
subject to their original terms. No awards for shares could be
granted under the 1997 stock option plan as of its expiration.
On April 29, 2008, the Corporations stockholders
approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the
Omnibus Plan). The Omnibus Plan provides for
equity-based compensation incentives (the awards)
through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares,
and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of
up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to
adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar
events. The Corporations Board of Directors, upon
receiving the relevant recommendation of the Compensation
Committee, has the power and authority to determine those
eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and
conditions of any awards subject to various limits and vesting
restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards.
Shares delivered pursuant to an award may consist, in whole or
in part, of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock or
shares of Common Stock acquired by the Corporation. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, the Corporation granted
36,243 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of
$8.69 under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporations
independent directors, of which 4,027 were forfeited in the
second half of 2009 and 10,739 are vested.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the
Corporation recognized $23,333 and $26,250, respectively, of
stock-based compensation expense related to the aforementioned
restricted stock awards. The total unrecognized compensation
cost related to the non-vested restricted shares was $190,556 as
of March 31, 2010 and is expected to be recognized over the
next 1.6 years.
The Corporation accounts for stock options using the
modified prospective method. There were no stock
options granted during 2010 and 2009, therefore no compensation
associated with stock options was recorded in those years.
Stock-based compensation accounting guidance requires the
Corporation to develop an estimate of the number of share-based
awards which will be forfeited due to employee or director
turnover. Quarterly changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may
have a significant effect on share-based compensation, as the
effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is
recognized in the period in which the forfeiture estimate is
changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the
estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to
increase the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in a
decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements.
If the actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated
forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to decrease the
estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to
the expense recognized in the financial statements. When
unvested options or shares of restricted stock are forfeited,
any compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited
awards is reversed in the period of the forfeiture.
15
The activity of stock options during the period ended
March 31, 2010 is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
2,481,310
|
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
|
14.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period outstanding and exercisable
|
|
|
2,455,310
|
|
|
$
|
13.45
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No stock options were exercised during the first quarter of 2010
or in 2009.
|
|
4
|
INVESTMENT
SECURITIES
|
Investment
Securities Available for Sale
The amortized cost, non-credit loss component of
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) on securities recorded in other
comprehensive income (OCI), gross unrealized gains
and losses recorded in OCI, approximate fair value,
weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment
securities available for sale as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
in OCI
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
in OCI
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
$
|
49,868
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,897
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored agencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
914,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916,653
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
1,139,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145,139
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
11,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
11,930
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
12,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
11,989
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
113,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
113,497
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
113,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
113,487
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,313
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
6,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,620
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
1,100,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
1,102,921
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1,275,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,284
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,281,465
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
334,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
338,216
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
|
705,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,388
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
722,219
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
338,230
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
|
705,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,388
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
722,249
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
382,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,763
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
396,221
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
407,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,808
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
417,393
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,811
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
397,275
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
408,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,850
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
418,312
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
95,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,973
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
101,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,716
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
105,406
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
1,280,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315,688
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
|
1,374,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,629
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
|
|
1,402,386
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415,661
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
1,476,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,345
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
1,507,792
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
in OCI
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
in OCI
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
134,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,835
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
156,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
156,307
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
113,405
|
|
|
|
32,523
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,883
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
117,198
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,342,206
|
|
|
|
32,523
|
|
|
|
58,599
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
2,367,884
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
|
2,863,888
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
|
|
64,218
|
|
|
|
6,246
|
|
|
|
2,889,014
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (without contractual maturity)(1)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
3,442,684
|
|
|
$
|
32,523
|
|
|
$
|
61,337
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
|
$
|
4,139,661
|
|
|
$
|
32,846
|
|
|
$
|
70,583
|
|
|
$
|
6,616
|
|
|
$
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents common shares of other financial institutions in
Puerto Rico. |
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on
contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities
of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments
and/or call
options as was the case with approximately $275 million of
U.S. agency debt securities called during 2010. The
weighted-average yield on investment securities available for
sale is based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give
effect to changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss
on securities available for sale and the non-credit loss
component of OTTI are presented as part of OCI.
The following tables show the Corporations
available-for-sale
investments fair value and gross unrealized losses,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
It also includes debt securities for which an OTTI was
recognized and only the amount related to a credit loss was
recognized in earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
11,880
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
9,097
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
20,977
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC
|
|
|
100,690
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,690
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
GNMA
|
|
|
42,388
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,388
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,647
|
|
|
|
32,523
|
|
|
|
80,647
|
|
|
|
32,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
154,958
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
89,744
|
|
|
$
|
32,585
|
|
|
$
|
244,702
|
|
|
$
|
33,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
14,760
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
9,113
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
23,873
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC
|
|
|
236,925
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,925
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
GNMA
|
|
|
72,178
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,178
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
FNMA
|
|
|
415,601
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,601
|
|
|
|
2,867
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA
|
|
|
105,075
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,075
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,105
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
|
|
84,105
|
|
|
|
32,846
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
844,629
|
|
|
$
|
6,569
|
|
|
$
|
93,218
|
|
|
$
|
32,893
|
|
|
$
|
937,847
|
|
|
$
|
39,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
Held to Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses,
approximate fair value, weighted-average yield and contractual
maturities of investment securities held to maturity as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield%
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year
|
|
$
|
8,490
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,497
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
8,480
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,492
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
18,755
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
19,352
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
|
18,584
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
19,055
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
4,995
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
4,995
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,072
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
32,240
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
32,907
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
32,059
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
32,619
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,369
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
5,015
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,093
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
FNMA certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
After 5 to 10 years
|
|
|
498,320
|
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,520
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
|
533,593
|
|
|
|
19,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,141
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
23,930
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
24,054
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
24,181
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,660
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
530,691
|
|
|
|
25,489
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
556,175
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
567,560
|
|
|
|
20,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,765
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
564,931
|
|
|
$
|
26,180
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
$
|
590,322
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
$
|
601,619
|
|
|
$
|
20,858
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
621,584
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on
contractual terms assuming no prepayments. Expected maturities
of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments
and/or call
options.
From time to time the Corporation has securities held to
maturity with an original maturity of three months or less that
are considered cash and cash equivalents and classified as money
market investments in the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Condition. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had
$300 million in
1-month
U.S. Treasury Bills with a weighted average yield of 0.28%.
The following tables show the Corporations
held-to-maturity
investments fair value and gross unrealized losses,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
4,809
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,809
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,848
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
1,240
|
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
11,088
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
5,878
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment
for OTTI
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to
determine whether there have been any events or economic
circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss
has suffered OTTI. A debt security is considered impaired if the
fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the
reporting date. The accounting literature requires the
Corporation to assess whether the unrealized loss is
other-than-temporary.
Prior to April 1, 2009, unrealized losses that were
determined to be temporary were recorded, net of tax, in other
comprehensive income for
available-for-sale
securities, whereas unrealized losses related to
held-to-maturity
securities determined to be temporary were not recognized.
Regardless of whether the security was classified as available
for sale or held to maturity, unrealized losses that were
determined to be
other-than-temporary
were recorded through earnings. An unrealized loss was
considered
other-than-temporary
if (i) it was probable that the holder would not collect
all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt
security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized
cost of the debt security for a prolonged period of time and the
Corporation did not have the positive intent and ability to hold
the security until recovery or maturity.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt
securities. Under the amended guidance, OTTI losses must be
recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the
debt security or it is more likely than not that it will be
required to sell the debt security before recovery of its
amortized cost basis.
19
However, even if an investor does not expect to sell a debt
security, it must evaluate expected cash flows to be received
and determine if a credit loss has occurred.
Under the amended guidance, an unrealized loss is generally
deemed to be
other-than-temporary
and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the
expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis
of the debt security. As a result of the Corporations
adoption of this new guidance, the credit loss component of an
OTTI, if any, would be recorded as a separate line item in the
accompanying consolidated statements of (loss) income, while the
remaining portion of the impairment loss would be recognized in
OCI, provided the Corporation does not intend to sell the
underlying debt security and it is more likely than
not that the Corporation will not have to sell the debt
security prior to recovery. For the quarter ended March 31,
2010, there were no credit loss impairment charges in earnings.
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies,
government-sponsored entities and the U.S. Treasury
accounted for more than 90% of the total
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
portfolio as of March 31, 2010 and no credit losses are
expected, given the explicit and implicit guarantees provided by
the U.S. federal government. The Corporations
assessment was concentrated mainly on private label MBS of
approximately $113 million for which the Corporation
evaluates credit losses on a quarterly basis. The Corporation
considered the following factors in determining whether a credit
loss exists and the period over which the debt security is
expected to recover:
|
|
|
|
|
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has
been less than the amortized cost basis.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral
of a security such as changes in default rates, loss severity
given default and significant changes in prepayment assumptions;
|
|
|
|
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral
supporting the principal and interest payments of the debt
securities; and
|
|
|
|
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the
issuer, taking into consideration the latest information
available about the overall financial condition of the issuer,
credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions
affecting the issuers industry and actions taken by the
issuer to deal with the present economic climate.
|
No OTTI losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities were recorded in the first quarter of 2010.
Cumulative unrealized
other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized in OCI as of March 31, 2010
amounted to $31.7 million.
Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on
single-family residential properties in the United States and
the interest rate is variable, tied to
3-month
LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
underlying collateral. The underlying mortgages are fixed-rate
single family loans with original high FICO scores (over
700) and moderate original
loan-to-value
ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels.
Based on the expected cash flows derived from the model, and
since the Corporation does not have the intention to sell the
securities and has sufficient capital and liquidity to hold
these securities until a recovery of the fair value occurs, no
credit losses were reflected in earnings for the period ended
March 31, 2010. As a result of the valuation performed as
of March 31, 2010, no additional
other-than-temporary
impairment was recorded for the period. Significant assumptions
in the valuation of the private label MBS as of March 31,
2010 were as follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Prepayment rate
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
13.37%-49.38%
|
|
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
0.37%-10.26%
|
|
For each of the quarters ended on March 31, 2010 and 2009,
the Corporation recorded OTTI of approximately $0.4 million
on certain equity securities held in its
available-for-sale
investment portfolio
20
related to financial institutions in Puerto Rico. Management
concluded that the declines in value of the securities were
other-than-temporary;
as such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to
the market value as of the date of the analysis and is reflected
in earnings as a realized loss.
Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale
during the period ended March 31, 2010 amounted to
approximately $450.5 million, including unsettled proceeds
of $57.1 million of securities sold (2009
$439.4 million including unsettled proceeds of
$248.2 million of securities sold).
5
OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES
Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to
maintain a minimum investment in FHLB stock. Such minimum is
calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages,
and an additional investment is required that is calculated as a
percentage of total FHLB advances, letters of credit, and the
collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The
stock is capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock
and cash dividends may be received on FHLB stock.
As of both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
Corporation had investments in FHLB stock with a book value of
$68.4 million ($54 million FHLB-New York and
$14.4 million FHLB-Atlanta). The net realizable value is a
reasonable proxy for the fair value of these instruments.
Dividend income from FHLB stock for the first quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $0.8 million and
$0.4 million, respectively.
The FHLB stocks owned by the Corporation are issued by the FHLB
of New York and by the FHLB of Atlanta. Both Banks are part of
the Federal Home Loan Bank System, a national wholesale banking
network of 12 regional, stockholder-owned congressionally
chartered banks. The Federal Home Loan Banks are all privately
capitalized and operated by their member stockholders. The
system is supervised by the Federal Housing Finance Agency,
which ensures that the Home Loan Banks operate in a financially
safe and sound manner, remain adequately capitalized and able to
raise funds in the capital markets, and carry out their housing
finance mission.
There is no secondary market for the FHLB stock and it does not
have a readily determinable fair value. The stock is a par
stock sold and redeemed at par. It can only be sold
to/from the FHLBs or a member institution. From an OTTI
analysis perspective, the relevant consideration for
determination is the ultimate recoverability of par value.
The economic conditions of late 2008 affected the FHLBs,
resulting in the recording of losses on private-label MBS
portfolios. In the midst of the mortgage market crisis the FHLB
of Atlanta temporarily suspended dividend payments on their
stock in the fourth quarter of 2008 and in the first quarter of
2009. In the second and third quarter of 2009, they were
re-instated. On March 25, 2010 the FHLB of Atlanta declared
a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of 2009 at an annualized
dividend rate of 0.27 percent. The FHLB of NY has not
suspended payment of dividends. Third and fourth quarter
dividends were reduced, and by the first quarter 2009 they were
increased.
The financial situation has since shown signs of improvement,
and so have the financial results of the FHLBs. The FHLB
of Atlanta reported preliminary financial results with reported
net income of approximately $48 million for the first
quarter of 2010, an increase of approximately $50 million
from a net loss of approximately $2 million for the first
quarter of 2009, while the FHLB of NY announced a net income to
$53.6 million for the first quarter of 2010. At
March 31, 2010, both Banks met their regulatory
capital-to-assets
ratios and liquidity requirements.
The FHLBs primary source of funding is debt obligations,
which continue to be rated Aaa and AAA by Moodys and
Standard and Poors respectively. The Corporation expects
to recover the par value of its investments in FHLB stocks in
its entirety, therefore no OTTI is deemed to be required.
The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a
readily available fair value. The carrying value of such
securities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
was $1.3 million and $1.6 million,
21
respectively. An impairment charge of $0.25 million was
recorded in the first quarter of 2010 related to an investment
in a failed financial institution in the United States.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation recognized a
$10.7 million gain on the sale of the remaining VISA
Class C shares. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation
no longer held any VISA shares.
6
LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages
|
|
$
|
3,578,642
|
|
|
$
|
3,595,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,457,027
|
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,547,707
|
|
|
|
1,590,821
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans(1)
|
|
|
4,523,178
|
|
|
|
5,029,907
|
|
Loans to a local financial institution collateralized by real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
314,628
|
|
|
|
321,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
7,842,540
|
|
|
|
8,434,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
309,275
|
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,543,110
|
|
|
|
1,579,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
13,273,567
|
|
|
|
13,928,451
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(575,303
|
)
|
|
|
(528,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
|
|
13,400,331
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
20,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
$
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, includes $1.2 billion of
commercial loans that are secured by real estate but are not
dependent upon the real estate for repayment. |
The Corporations primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The
Corporations Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, FirstBank or
the Bank, also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands
markets and in the United States (principally in the state of
Florida). Of the total gross loan portfolio of
$13.3 billion as of March 31, 2010, approximately 83%
have credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 9% in the United
States and 8% in the Virgin Islands
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had
$677.1 million outstanding of credit facilities granted to
the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions and $165.5 million granted to the
Virgin Islands government. A substantial portion of these credit
facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment, such as property
taxes collected by the central Government
and/or
municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of
loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates
charged for services or products, such as electric power and
water utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the
good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality have been pledged to their repayment.
Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
government, the largest loan to one borrower as of
March 31, 2010 in the amount of $314.6 million is with
one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial
Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate.
22
7
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
59,429
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(126,306
|
)
|
|
|
(42,460
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
575,303
|
|
|
$
|
302,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for
loan and lease losses. The allowance for impaired loans covers
those loans for which management has determined that it is
probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts
due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan
agreement, and does not necessarily represent loans for which
the Corporation will incur a loss. As of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, impaired loans and their related
allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs
|
|
$
|
1,110,441
|
|
|
$
|
1,060,088
|
|
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs
|
|
|
735,645
|
|
|
|
596,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
1,846,086
|
|
|
$
|
1,656,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans
|
|
$
|
245,300
|
|
|
$
|
182,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income of approximately $6.9 million and
$4.2 million was recognized on impaired loans for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, The
average recorded investment in impaired loans for the first
quarter of 2010 and 2009 was $1.7 billion and
$581.1 million, respectively.
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and
the related specific reserve during the first quarter of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,656,264
|
|
Loans determined impaired during the period
|
|
|
317,333
|
|
Net charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
(101,259
|
)
|
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $12.7 million(2)
|
|
|
(18,749
|
)
|
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments, net of
additional disbursements
|
|
|
(7,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,846,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately $52.3 million, or 52%, is related to
contruction loans ($33.7 million in Puerto Rico and
$18.6 million in Florida). Also, approximately
$15.0 million, or 15%, related to a commercial loan
extended to a local financial institution. |
|
(2) |
|
Associated with two commercial mortgage (originally disbursed as
condo-conversion) loans sold in Florida. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Specific Reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
182,145
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
164,414
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(101,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
245,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance
to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto
Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government.
Due to the nature of the borrowers financial condition,
restructurings or loan modifications through these program as
well as other restructurings of individual commercial,
commercial mortgage loans, construction loans and residential
mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR). A restructuring
of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or
legal reasons related to the debtors financial
difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more
of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and
provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the
refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and
escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and
modifications of the loan rate. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporations TDR loans amounted to $385.5 million
consisting of: $169.4 million of residential mortgage
loans, $44.8 million commercial and industrial loans,
$81.5 million commercial mortgage loans and
$89.8 million of construction loans. Outstanding unfunded
loan commitments on TDR loans amounted to $0.7 million as
of March 31, 2010.
Included in the $385.5 million of TDR loans are certain
impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into two separate
agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2009. Each
of these loans was restructured into two notes: one that
represents the portion of the loan that is expected to be fully
collected along with contractual interest and the second note
that represents the portion of the original loan that was
charged-off. The restructuring of these loans was made after
analyzing the borrowers and guarantors capacity to
service the debt and ability to perform under the modified
terms. As part of the renegotiation of the loans, the first note
of each loan has been placed on a monthly payment of principal
and interest that amortizes the debt over 25 years at a
market rate of interest. An interest rate reduction was granted
for the second note.
As of March 31, 2010, the carrying value of the notes that
were deemed collectible amounted to $22.0 million.
Charge-offs recorded prior to 2010 associated with these loans
were $29.7 million. The loans that have been deemed to be
collectible continue to be individually evaluated for impairment
purposes and a specific reserve of $3.4 million was
allocated to these loans as of March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation maintains a
$4.9 million reserve for unfunded loan commitments mainly
related to outstanding construction loans commitments. The
reserve for unfunded loan commitments is an estimate of the
losses inherent in off-balance sheet loan commitments at the
balance sheet date. It is calculated by multiplying an estimated
loss factor by an estimated probability of funding, and then by
the period-end amounts for unfunded commitments. The reserve for
unfunded loan commitments is included as part of accounts
payable and other liabilities in the consolidated statement of
financial condition.
8
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate
risk, which includes the risk that changes in interest rates
will result in changes in the value of the Corporations
assets or liabilities and the risk that net interest income from
its loan and investment portfolios will be adversely affected by
changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the
Corporations interest rate risk management activities is
to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in
interest rates.
The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including
derivatives, to manage the interest rate risk primarily for
protection from rising interest rates in connection with private
label MBS.
The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge,
cash flow hedge or an economic undesignated hedge when it enters
into the derivative contract. As of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, all derivatives held by the Corporation
were considered economic undesignated hedges. These undesignated
hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain or
loss recognized in current earnings.
The following summarizes the principal derivative activities
used by the Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest rate
cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a reference
interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value
increases as the reference interest rate
24
rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements
for protection from rising interest rates. Specifically, the
interest rate on certain private label mortgage pass-through
securities and certain of the Corporations commercial
loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable
rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through
certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less
a contractual servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap
agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and
floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange
of the underlying notional principal amount. As of
March 31, 2010, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding
are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the
past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher since they were
used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly
those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate
the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. All
interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during
2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and, as a
consequence, the Corporation exercised its call option on the
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising
from changes in fair value, net interest settlements on interest
rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest income or
interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is
being economically hedged.
Indexed options Indexed options are generally
over-the-counter
(OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters into in order to
receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g., Dow
Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period
in exchange for a premium paid at the contracts inception.
The option period is determined by the contractual maturity of
the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index.
The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the
exchange party may not fulfill its obligation. To satisfy the
needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter into
non-hedging transactions. On these transactions, generally, the
Corporation participates as a buyer in one of the agreements and
as a seller in the other agreement under the same terms and
conditions.
In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with
embedded derivatives that do not require separate accounting as
these are clearly and closely related to the economic
characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded
derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not
clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of
the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and
designated as a trading or non-hedging derivative instrument.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all
derivative instruments as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amounts
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Economic undesignated hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge loans
|
|
$
|
79,056
|
|
|
$
|
79,567
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
102,296
|
|
|
|
102,521
|
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
224,130
|
|
|
|
228,384
|
|
Equity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes
payable
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on
embedded stock index options
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
|
|
53,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,512
|
|
|
$
|
517,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative
instruments and the location in the Statement of Financial
Condition as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Financial Condition
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Economic undesignated hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge loans
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,091
|
|
|
$
|
5,068
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
1,293
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on
embedded stock index options
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,147
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,453
|
|
|
$
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative
instruments on the Statement of (Loss) Income for the quarters
ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Location of Unrealized Gain or (Loss)
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
Interest Expense on Deposit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,359
|
)
|
Notes payable
|
|
Interest Expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Loans
|
|
Interest Income on Loans
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
553
|
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
Interest Income on Investment Securities
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
|
Written and purchased interest rate cap agreements
loans
|
|
Interest Income on Loans
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Equity contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits
|
|
Interest Expense on Deposits
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable
|
|
Interest Expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss on derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
(775
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject
to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the
market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of
the financial markets expectations regarding the future
direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values
are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the
most
26
part, on the shape of the yield curve, the level of interest
rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the future. The
unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of derivatives
that economically hedge certain callable brokered CDs and
medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized gains and
losses on the valuation of such economically hedged liabilities
measured at fair value. The Corporation includes the gain or
loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and
medium-term notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss
or gain on the related derivatives as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Liabilities
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Gain on Liabilities
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
Measured at Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Loss
|
|
Measured at Fair
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
on Derivatives
|
|
Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
on Derivatives
|
|
Value
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on Deposits
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,426
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,141
|
|
|
$
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on Notes Payable and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(958
|
)
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating (generally used to economically hedge
loans):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount
|
|
$
|
79,056
|
|
|
$
|
79,567
|
|
Weighted-average receive rate at period end
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Weighted-average pay rate at period end
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis points over
3-month
LIBOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation has not entered into
any derivative instrument containing credit-risk-related
contingent features.
|
|
9
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
|
Goodwill as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
amounted to $28.1 million, recognized as part of
Other Assets. The Corporation conducted its annual
evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2009. This
evaluation is a two-step process. The Step 1 evaluation of
goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one
level below the United States business segment, indicated
potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the
unit was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as
of the December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the
completion of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all
assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any
recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the
fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation
subtracted from the units Step 1 fair value the determined
fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value
of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill
carrying value by approximately $107.4 million, resulting
in no goodwill impairment. There have been no events related to
the Florida reporting unit that could indicate potential
goodwill impairment since the date of the last evaluation;
therefore, no goodwill impairment evaluation was performed
during the first quarter of 2010. Goodwill and other indefinite
life intangibles are reviewed at least annually for impairment.
As of March 31, 2010, the gross carrying amount and
accumulated amortization of core deposit intangibles was
$41.8 million and $25.9 million, respectively,
recognized as part of Other Assets in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(December 31, 2009 $41.8 million and
$25.2 million, respectively). For the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, the amortization expense of core deposit
intangibles amounted to $0.7 million (2009
$1.0 million). As a result of an impairment evaluation of
core deposit intangibles, there was an impairment charge of
$3.7 million recognized during the first quarter of 2009
related
27
to core deposits in Florida attributable to decreases in the
base of core deposits acquired and recorded as part of other
non-interest expenses in the Statement of (Loss) Income.
|
|
10
|
VARIABLE
INTEREST ENTITIES AND SERVICING ASSETS
|
The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in sale or
securitization transactions in which it has continuing
involvement, which includes servicing responsibilities and
guarantee arrangements. All such transfers have been accounted
for as sales as required by applicable accounting guidance.
When evaluating transfers and other transactions with variable
interest entities for consolidation under the newly adopted
guidance, the Corporation first determines if the counterparty
is an entity for which a variable interest exists. If no scope
exception is applicable and a variable interest exists, the
Corporation then evaluates if it is the primary beneficiary of
the variable interest entity and whether the entity should be
consolidated or not.
Below is a summary of transfers of financial assets to VIEs for
which the Company has retained some level of continuing
involvement:
Ginnie
Mae
The Corporation typically transfers first lien residential
mortgage loans in conjunction with Ginnie Mae securitization
transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or
securities that are readily redeemed for cash proceeds and
servicing rights. The securities issued through these
transactions are guaranteed by the issuer and, as such, under
seller/servicer agreements the Corporation is required to
service the loans in accordance with the issuers servicing
guidelines and standards, such standards require that the
Corporation repurchase loans that become delinquent. As of
March 31, 2010, the Corporation serviced loans securitized
through GNMA with principal balance of $341 million.
Trust Preferred
Securities
In 2004, FBP Statutory Trust I, a financing subsidiary of
the Corporation, sold to institutional investors
$100 million of its variable rate trust preferred
securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the
proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.1 million
of FBP Statutory Trust I variable rate common securities,
were used by FBP Statutory Trust I to purchase
$103.1 million aggregate principal amount of the
Corporations Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures.
Also in 2004, FBP Statutory Trust II, a statutory trust
that is wholly-owned by the Corporation, sold to institutional
investors $125 million of its variable rate trust preferred
securities. The proceeds of the issuance, together with the
proceeds of the purchase by the Corporation of $3.9 million
of FBP Statutory Trust II variable rate common securities,
were used by FBP Statutory Trust II to purchase
$128.9 million aggregate principal amount of the
Corporations Junior Subordinated Deferrable Debentures.
The trust preferred debentures are presented in the
Corporations Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
as Other Borrowings, net of related issuance costs. The variable
rate trust preferred securities are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Corporation. The $100 million Junior
Subordinated Deferrable Debentures issued by the Corporation in
April 2004 and the $125 million issued in September 2004
mature on June 17, 2034 and September 20, 2034,
respectively; however, under certain circumstances, the maturity
of Junior Subordinated Debentures may be shortened (such
shortening would result in a mandatory redemption of the
variable rate trust preferred securities). The trust preferred
securities, subject to certain limitations, qualify as
Tier I regulatory capital under current Federal Reserve
rules and regulations.
Grantor
Trusts
During 2004 and 2005, a third party to the Corporation, from now
on identified as the seller, established a series of statutory
trusts to effect the securitization of mortgage loans and the
sale of trust certificates. The seller initially provided the
servicing for a fee, which is senior to the obligations to pay
trust certificate holders. The seller then entered into a sales
agreement through which it sold and issued the trust
certificates in favor of the Corporations banking
subsidiary. Currently the Bank is the 100% owner of the trust
certificates;
28
the servicing of the underlying residential mortgages that
generate the principal and interest cash flows, is performed by
the seller, which receives a fee compensation for services
provided, the servicing fee. The securities are variable rate
securities tied to LIBOR index plus a spread. The principal
payments from the underlying loans are remitted to a paying
agent (the seller) who then remits interest to the Bank;
interest income is shared to a certain extent with a third party
financial institution that has an interest only strip
(IO) tied to the cash flows of the underlying loans,
whereas it is entitled to received the excess of the interest
income less a servicing fee over the variable rate income that
the Bank earns on the securities. This IO is limited to weighted
average coupon of the securities. No recourse agreement exists
and the risk from losses on non accruing loans and repossessed
collateral are absorbed by the Bank as 100% holder of the
certificates. As of March 31, 2010, outstanding balance of
Grantor Trusts amounted to $113 million with a weighted
average yield of 2.27%
The Corporation is actively involved in the securitization of
pools of FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgages for issuance of
GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Also, certain conventional
conforming-loans are sold to FNMA or FHLMC with servicing
retained. The Corporation recognizes as separate assets the
rights to service loans for others, whether those servicing
assets are originated or purchased.
The changes in servicing assets are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,902
|
|
|
$
|
8,151
|
|
Capitalization of servicing assets
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
Adjustment to servicing assets for loans repurchased(1)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance before valuation allowance at end of period
|
|
|
12,594
|
|
|
|
8,738
|
|
Valuation allowance for temporary impairment
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(1,504
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
12,414
|
|
|
$
|
7,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents the adjustment to fair value related to the
repurchase of $53.5 million in principal balance of loans
serviced for others |
Impairment charges are recognized through a valuation allowance
for each individual stratum of servicing assets. The valuation
allowance is adjusted to reflect the amount, if any, by which
the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum of
loans being serviced exceeds its fair value. Any fair value in
excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given
stratum is not recognized.
Other-than-temporary
impairments, if any, are recognized as a direct write-down of
the servicing assets.
Changes in the impairment allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
Temporary impairment charges
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
The components of net servicing income are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Servicing fees
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
Late charges and prepayment penalties
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income, gross
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
Recovery (amortization and impairment) of servicing assets
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing income (loss), net
|
|
$
|
1,172
|
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations servicing assets are subject to
prepayment and interest rate risks. Constant prepayment rate
assumptions for the Corporations servicing assets for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 were 12.7% and 24.8% for government
guaranteed mortgage loans, respectively. For conventional
conforming mortgage loans, the Corporation used 14.8% and 20.4%
and for conventional non-conforming mortgage loans 11.5% and
18.5% for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009, respectively. Discount rate assumptions
used were 10.3% and 11.8% for government guaranteed mortgage
loans; 9.3% and 9.2% for conventional conforming mortgage loans;
and 13.1% and 13.2% for conventional non-conforming mortgage
loans for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009, respectively.
At March 31, 2010, fair values of the Corporations
servicing assets were based on a valuation model that
incorporates market driven assumptions, adjusted by the
particular characteristics of the Corporations servicing
portfolio, regarding discount rates and mortgage prepayment
rates. The weighted-averages of the key economic assumptions
used by the Corporation in its valuation model and the
sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate
10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those
assumptions for mortgage loans at March 31, 2010, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Carrying amount of servicing assets
|
|
$
|
12,414
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
15,981
|
|
Weighted-average expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.55
|
|
Constant prepayment rate (weighted-average annual rate)
|
|
|
13.75
|
%
|
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change
|
|
$
|
1,078
|
|
Discount rate (weighted-average annual rate)
|
|
|
9.92
|
%
|
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change
|
|
$
|
1,094
|
|
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with
caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on
a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in
assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also,
in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the servicing asset is
calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality,
changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for
example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower
prepayments), which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
30
The following table summarizes deposit balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Type of account and interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing checking accounts
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
|
$
|
697,022
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
1,934,527
|
|
|
|
1,774,273
|
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts
|
|
|
1,108,008
|
|
|
|
985,470
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,779,975
|
|
|
|
1,650,866
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
7,352,330
|
|
|
|
7,561,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
$
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest expense on deposits includes the valuation to
market of interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered
CDs, the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker
placement fees related to brokered CDs not measured at fair
value and changes in fair value of callable brokered CDs
measured at fair value.
The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits
|
|
$
|
60,500
|
|
|
$
|
90,942
|
|
Amortization of broker placement fees(1)
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
7,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits excluding net unrealized loss
(gain) on derivatives and SFAS 159 brokered CDs
|
|
|
65,965
|
|
|
|
98,025
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives and brokered CDs
measured at fair value
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits
|
|
$
|
65,966
|
|
|
$
|
95,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value |
Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements
on interest rate swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs that
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 amounted to net
interest realized of $4.7 million. No amount was recognized
for the first quarter of 2010 since all interest rate swaps
related to brokered CDs were called in 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, loans payable consisted of
$600 million in short-term borrowings under the FED
Discount Window Program bearing interest at 1.25%. The
Corporation participates in the
Borrower-in-Custody
(BIC) Program of the FED. Through the BIC Program, a
broad range of loans (including commercial, consumer and
mortgages) may be pledged as collateral for borrowings through
the FED Discount Window. As of March 31, 2010, collateral
pledged related to this credit facility amounted to
$1.3 billion, mainly commercial, consumer and mortgage
loans. With U.S. market conditions improving, the Federal
Reserve announced in early 2010 its intention to withdraw part
of the economic stimulus measures including reinstating
restrictions in the use of Discount Window borrowings, thereby
returning to its function as a lender of last resort. The
Corporation expects to repay the $600 million outstanding
on or before June 30, 2010.
31
|
|
13
|
SECURITIES
SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 0.94% to 5.39%
(2009 0.23% to 5.39)%
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
One to thirty days
|
|
$
|
|
|
Over thirty to ninety days
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Over ninety days to one year
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
One to three years
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Three to five years
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
securities underlying such agreements were delivered to the
dealers with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted.
Repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2010, grouped by
counterparty, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Maturity (In Months)
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Barclays Capital
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Dean Witter / Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
JP Morgan Chase
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
ADVANCES
FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB)
|
Following is a summary of the advances from the FHLB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average interest
rate of 3.20% (2009 3.21)%
|
|
$
|
960,440
|
|
|
$
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
One to thirty days
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Over thirty to ninety days
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Over ninety days to one year
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
One to three years
|
|
|
462,000
|
|
Three to five years
|
|
|
78,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had additional
capacity of approximately $463.9 million on this credit
facility based on collateral pledged at the FHLB, including
haircuts reflecting the perceived risk associated with holding
the collateral.
15
NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest from
5.00% to 7.00% (5.50% as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009) maturing on October 18, 2019,
measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
14,319
|
|
|
$
|
13,361
|
|
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal protected
notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012
|
|
|
6,660
|
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011
|
|
|
7,334
|
|
|
|
7,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
28,313
|
|
|
$
|
27,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at
a floating-rate of 2.75% over
3-month
LIBOR (3.01% as of March 31, 2010 and 3.00% as of
December 31, 2009)
|
|
$
|
103,093
|
|
|
$
|
103,093
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034, interest-bearing at
a floating-rate of 2.50% over
3-month
LIBOR (2.78% as of March 31, 2010 and 2.75% as of
December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
128,866
|
|
|
|
128,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
231,959
|
|
|
$
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Common
stock
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had 250,000,000
authorized shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per
share. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
there were 102,440,522 shares issued and
92,542,722 shares outstanding. In February 2009, the
Corporations Board of Directors declared a first quarter
cash dividend of $0.07 per common share which was paid on
March 31, 2009 to common stockholders of record on
March 15, 2009 and in May 2009 declared a second quarter
dividend of $0.07 per common share
33
which was paid on June 30, 2009 to common stockholders of
record on June 15, 2009. On July 30, 2009, the
Corporation announced the suspension of common and preferred
dividends effective with the preferred dividend for the month of
August 2009.
On April 27, 2010, First BanCorps stockholders
approved a proposal to increase the number of shares of common
stock the Corporation is authorized to issue from
250 million shares to 750 million shares. With the
approval of this proposal, the Corporation may have enough
authorized shares of common stock to enable it to raise
additional capital to provide additional protection from the
possibility that, due to the current economic situation in
Puerto Rico that has impacted the Corporations asset
quality and earnings performance, First BanCorp will have to
recognize additional loan loss reserves against its loan
portfolio and absorb the potential future credit losses
associated with the disposition of non performing assets. The
Corporation is also considering a rights offering to existing
stockholders and possible exchange offers to holders of its
preferred stock. Refer to Note 1 for additional information.
Stock
repurchase plan and treasury stock
The Corporation has a stock repurchase program under which from
time to time it repurchases shares of common stock in the open
market and holds them as treasury stock. No shares of common
stock were repurchased during 2010 and 2009 by the Corporation.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, of the
total amount of common stock repurchased in prior years,
9,897,800 shares were held as treasury stock and were
available for general corporate purposes.
Preferred
stock
The Corporation has 50,000,000 authorized shares of preferred
stock with a par value of $1, redeemable at the
Corporations option subject to certain terms. This stock
may be issued in series and the shares of each series shall have
such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of
Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular
series. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation has five
outstanding series of non-convertible non-cumulative preferred
stock which trade on the NYSE: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series A; 8.35%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series B; 7.40% noncumulative perpetual monthly income
preferred stock, Series C; 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series D; and 7.00%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series E. The liquidation value per share is $25. Annual
dividends of $1.75 per share (Series E), $1.8125 per share
(Series D), $1.85 per share (Series C), $2.0875 per
share (Series B) and $1.78125 per share
(Series A) are payable monthly, if declared by the
Board of Directors. Dividends declared on the non-convertible
non-cumulative preferred stock for the first quarter of 2009
amounted to $10.1 million; consistent with the
Corporations announcement in July 2009, no dividends have
been declared for the three-month period ended March 31,
2010.
In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase
Program, established as part of the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the
U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000
liquidation preference value per share. The Series F
Preferred Stock has a call feature after three years. In
connection with this investment, the Corporation also issued to
the U.S. Treasury a
10-year
warrant (the Warrant) to purchase
5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common stock at
an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The Corporation
registered the Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and
the shares of common stock underlying the Warrant for sale under
the Securities Act of 1933. The Corporation recorded the total
$400 million of the Series F Preferred Stock and the
Warrant at their relative fair values of $374.2 million and
$25.8 million, respectively. The Series F Preferred
Stock was valued using a discounted cash flow analysis and
applying a discount rate of 10.9%. The difference from the par
amount of the Series F Preferred Stock is accreted to
preferred stock over five years using the interest method with a
corresponding adjustment to preferred dividends. The
Cox-Rubinstein binomial model was used to estimate the value of
the Warrant with a strike price calculated, pursuant to the
Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury, based
on the average closing prices of the common stock on the 20
trading days ending the last day prior to the date of approval
to participate in the Program. No credit risk was assumed given
the Corporations availability of authorized, but unissued
common shares, as
34
well as its intention of reserving sufficient shares to satisfy
the exercise of the warrants. The volatility parameter input was
the historical
5-year
common stock price volatility.
The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1
regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F
Preferred Stock accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a
quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five
years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only
be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporations Board
of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The
Series F Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with the
Corporations existing Series A through E, in terms of
dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation,
dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase
Agreement relating to this issuance contains limitations on the
payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular
quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last
quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly
announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14,
2008, which is $0.07 per share. As of March 31, 2010,
cumulative preferred dividends not declared amounted to
$17.6 million, including $5.0 million corresponding to
the first quarter of 2010.
The Warrant has a
10-year term
and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are
subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
The possible future issuance of equity securities through the
exercise of the Warrant could affect the Corporations
current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock
(the shares underlying the warrant represent approximately 6% of
the Corporations shares of common stock as of
March 31, 2010);
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the
outstanding shares of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
|
As mentioned above, on July 30, 2009, the Corporation
announced the suspension of dividends for common and all its
outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was
effective with the dividends for the month of August 2009, on
the Corporations five outstanding series of non-cumulative
preferred stock and dividends for the Corporations
outstanding Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock and the
Corporations common stock. As a result of the dividend
suspension, the terms of the Series F Cumulative Preferred
Stock include limitations on the resumption of the payment of
cash dividends and purchases of outstanding shares of common and
preferred stock.
18
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state
taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on
its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First
BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income
tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income
tax only on its income from sources within the United States or
income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business within the United States. Any such tax paid is
creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against
the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability. The
Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on
its income from sources within that jurisdiction. Any such tax
paid is also creditable against the Corporations Puerto
Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and
limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended
(the PR Code), the Corporation and its subsidiaries
are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to
file consolidated tax returns and, thus, the Corporation is not
able to utilize losses from one subsidiary to offset gains in
another subsidiary. Accordingly, in order to obtain a tax
benefit from a net operating loss, a particular subsidiary must
be able to demonstrate sufficient taxable income within the
applicable carry forward period (7 years under the PR
Code). The PR Code provides a dividend received deduction of
100% on dividends received from controlled
subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on
dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.
Dividend payments from a U.S. subsidiary to the Corporation
are subject to a 10% withholding
35
tax based on the provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue
Code. Under the PR Code, First BanCorp is subject to a maximum
statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009, the Puerto Rico Government
approved Act No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate
Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico
Governments fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of
temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a
5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is
applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income
exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the
maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in
the capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This
temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced
after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that
applies if the Corporations regular income tax liability
is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than
the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government
obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from
U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business
through International Banking Entities (IBEs) of the
the Corporation and the Bank and through the Banks
subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which the
interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and
U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are subject
to the special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject
to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also
effective for tax years that commenced after December 31,
2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank
Overseas Corporation were created under the International
Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides for total
Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs
operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a bank
pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the
IBEs net income exceeds 20% of the banks total net
taxable income.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation
recorded income tax expense of $6.9 million related to the
operations of profitable subsidiaries and an increase in the
valuation allowance, compared to an income tax benefit of
$14.2 million for the same period in 2009. The variance in
income tax expense mainly resulted from non-cash charges of
approximately $40.9 million to increase the valuation
allowance of the Corporations deferred tax asset. Most of
the increase is related to deferred tax assets created in 2010
that were fully reserved. Approximately $3.5 million of the
increase to the valuation allowance was related to deferred tax
assets created before 2010 and the remaining income tax expense
is related to the operations of profitable subsidiaries. As of
March 31, 2010, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation
allowance of $232.6 million, amounted to
$104.5 million compared to $109.2 million as of
December 31, 2009.
Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess
whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their
deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not realization
standard. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary,
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant
weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively
verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The
accounting for income taxes guidance requires the consideration
of all sources of taxable income available to realize the
deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing
temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In
estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and
risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking
into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and
recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a
significant negative factor that has resulted in increases of
the valuation allowance was that the Corporations banking
subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico continues in a three-year
historical cumulative loss as of the end of the first quarter of
2010, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan
and lease losses, especially in the construction loan portfolio
in both, Puerto Rico and Florida markets, as a result of the
economic downturn. As of March 31, 2010, management
concluded that $104.5 million of the deferred tax assets
will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the
deferred tax assets, management has considered all four sources
of taxable income mentioned above and, even though the
Corporation expects to be profitable in the near future to
realize the deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic
conditions, the Corporation has only relied on tax-planning
strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the
deferred tax asset amount. Among the most significant tax-
36
planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of appreciated
assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and unprofitable
companies (in Puerto Rico each company files a separate tax
return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted), and
(iii) deferral of deductions without affecting its
utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood
of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If
future events differ from managements March 31, 2010
assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be
established which may have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations results of operations. Similarly, to the
extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset
becomes more likely than not based on changes in
circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws
or other relevant changes), a reversal of that portion of the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact
on the Corporations liquidity or cash flow, nor does such
an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax
credits or other deferred tax assets in the future.
The income tax provision in 2010 and 2009 was also impacted by
adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result of the
aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates.
Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the
change in the income tax rate considering the enacted tax rate
expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the
deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or
realized and an adjustment of $6.4 million was recorded in
the first quarter of 2010.
FASB guidance prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial
statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure
of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions taken or
expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under the
authoritative accounting guidance, income tax benefits are
recognized and measured based upon a two-step model: 1) a
tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based
solely on its technical merits in order to be recognized, and
2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar amount of
that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon
settlement. The difference between the benefit recognized in
accordance with this model and the tax benefit claimed on a tax
return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefits
(UTB).
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs
by $10.8 million and related accrued interest of
$5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations
for the 2004 taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation
entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of the
Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all
possible income and withholding tax deficiencies related to
taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of such
agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of
2009 the remaining UTBs and related interest by approximately
$2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of
the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Corporation classified all interest and penalties, if any,
related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense. For the
first quarter of 2009, the total amount of interest recognized
by the Corporation as part of income tax expense was
$0.4 million. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease
for various reasons, including changes in the amounts for
current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax
returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitations,
changes in managements judgment about the level of
uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and
legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
19
FAIR VALUE
Fair
Value Option
Medium-Term
Notes
The Corporation elected the fair value option for certain medium
term notes that were hedged with interest rate swaps that were
previously designated for fair value hedge accounting. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these
medium-term notes had a fair value of $14.3 million and
$13.4 million, respectively, and principal balance of
$15.4 million recorded in notes payable. Interest
paid/accrued on these instruments is recorded as part of
interest expense and the accrued interest is part of the fair
value of the notes. Electing the
37
fair value option allows the Corporation to eliminate the burden
of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting (e.g.,
documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing
earnings volatility.
Medium-term notes for which the Corporation elected the fair
value option were priced using observable market data in the
institutional markets.
Callable
brokered CDs
In the past, the Corporation also measured at fair value
callable brokered CDs. All of the brokered CDs measured at fair
value were called during 2009.
Fair
Value Measurement
The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement
defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair
value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs may be used to
measure fair value:
Level 1 Valuations of Level 1
assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available
pricing sources for market transactions involving identical
assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities
include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange
market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other
U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt
securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active
markets.
Level 2 Valuations of Level 2
assets and liabilities are based on observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and
liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for
which the fair value is estimated based on the value of
identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with
quoted prices that are traded less frequently than
exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts
and financial liabilities (e.g., medium-term notes elected to be
measured at fair value) whose value is determined using a
pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or
can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data.
Level 3 Valuations of Level 3
assets and liabilities are based on unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for
which the determination of fair value requires significant
management judgment or estimation.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there have been no
transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2
measurements of the fair value hierarchy.
Estimated
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial
instruments required by GAAP is presented hereunder. The
aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily
represent managements estimate of the underlying value of
the Corporation.
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and,
therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the
underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could
significantly affect the results. In addition, the fair value
estimates are based on outstanding balances without attempting
to estimate the value of anticipated future business.
38
The following table presents the estimated fair value and
carrying value of financial instruments as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Condition
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Condition
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
3/31/2010
|
|
|
3/31/2010
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
|
|
$
|
1,330,199
|
|
|
$
|
1,330,199
|
|
|
$
|
704,084
|
|
|
$
|
704,084
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
590,322
|
|
|
|
601,619
|
|
|
|
621,584
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
|
|
|
13,293,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(575,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(528,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
12,132,999
|
|
|
|
13,421,106
|
|
|
|
12,811,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
13,010,299
|
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
12,801,811
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,670,138
|
|
|
|
3,076,631
|
|
|
|
3,242,110
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
1,002,059
|
|
|
|
978,440
|
|
|
|
1,025,605
|
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
27,115
|
|
|
|
27,117
|
|
|
|
25,716
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
95,349
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
80,267
|
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, including financial liabilities for which the Corporation
has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
U.S. Treasury Securities
|
|
|
49,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable U.S. agency debt and MBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,203,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,203,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,949,799
|
|
Puerto Rico Government Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,326
|
|
Private label MBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,883
|
|
|
|
80,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Fair
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock market on
embeded stock indexed options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,361
|
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
Written interest rate cap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes
payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010, for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant
|
|
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
and Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
$
|
(1,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
include interest expense on medium-term notes of
$0.1 million. Interest expense on medium-term notes that
have been elected to be carried at fair value is recorded in
interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income
based on such instruments contractual coupons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009, for Items Measured at Fair Value
Pursuant
|
|
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain and
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain and
|
|
|
Unrealized (Losses) Gains
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense included
|
|
|
Interest Expense included
|
|
|
and Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
in Interest Expense
|
|
|
in Interest Expense
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
|
on Deposits(1)
|
|
|
on Notes Payable(1)
|
|
|
Current-Period Earnings(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,781
|
)
|
Medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(1,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the Quarter ended March 31, 2009
include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of
$8.9 million and interest expense on medium- term notes of
$0.2 million. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and
medium-term notes that have been elected to be carried at fair
value is recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated
Statements of (Loss) Income based on such instruments
contractual coupons. |
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Level 3
Instruments Only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended March 31, 2010)
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Derivatives(1)
|
|
|
Available for Sale(2)
|
|
|
Derivatives(1)
|
|
|
Available for Sale(2)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
4,199
|
|
|
$
|
84,354
|
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
113,983
|
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Principal repayments and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
3,487
|
|
|
$
|
80,883
|
|
|
$
|
982
|
|
|
$
|
110,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts mostly related to private label mortgage-backed
securities. |
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and
losses recorded in earnings for the quarters ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 for Level 3 assets and
liabilities that are still held at the end of each period.
Level 3
Instruments Only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended March 31, 2010)
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended March 31, 2009)
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized losses relating to assets still held at
reporting date(1)(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Interest income on investment securities
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(712
|
)
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent valuation of interest rate cap agreements |
|
(2) |
|
Unrealized losses of $0.3 million, and $1.1 million on
Level 3
available-for-sale
securities was recognized as part of other comprehensive income
for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. |
Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to
evaluate certain assets in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to
fair value usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market
accounting
41
(e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of cost or fair
value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of individual
assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).
As of March 31, 2010, impairment or valuation adjustments
were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses Recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Quarter
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of March 31, 2010
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,390,467
|
|
|
$
|
137,767
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
Loans held for sale(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The
impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the
collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for
specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific
characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. Losses are
related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer from
the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Fair value is primarily derived from quotations based on the
mortgage-backed securities market. |
As of March 31, 2009, impairment or valuation adjustments
were recorded for assets recognized at fair value on a
non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses Recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Quarter
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of March 31, 2009
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
360,442
|
|
|
$
|
31,361
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,434
|
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
Core deposit intangible(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,952
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The
impairment was generally measured based on the fair value of the
collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for
specific characteristics and assumptions of the collateral (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into
consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific
characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g.
absorption rates), which are not market observable. Valuation
allowance is based on market valuation adjustments after the
transfer from the loan to the OREO portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amount represents core deposit intangible in Florida. The
impairment was generally measured based on internal information
about decreases in the base of core deposits acquired upon the
acquisition of FirstBank Florida. |
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for instruments for which an estimated fair value is
presented as well as for instruments for which the Corporation
has elected the fair value option. The estimated fair value was
calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which vary
depending on the specific financial instrument.
42
Cash and
due from banks and money market investments
The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks and money market
investments are reasonable estimates of their fair value. Money
market investments include
held-to-maturity
U.S. Government obligations, which have a contractual
maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these
securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets
that incorporate the risk of nonperformance.
Investment
securities available for sale and held to maturity
The fair value of investment securities is the market value
based on quoted market prices (as is the case with equity
securities and U.S. Treasury notes), when available, or
market prices for identical or comparable assets (as is the case
with MBS and callable U.S. agency debt) that are based on
observable market parameters including benchmark yields,
reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers, issuer spreads,
bids, offers and reference data including market research
operations. Observable prices in the market already consider the
risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are not
available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable
inputs due to the limited market activity of the instrument, as
is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed
securities held by the Corporation.
Private label mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by
fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential properties in
the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to
3-month
LIBOR and limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
underlying collateral. The market valuation is derived from a
model and represents the estimated net cash flows over the
projected life of the pool of underlying assets applying a
discount rate that reflects market observed floating spreads
over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a nonrated security
and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate,
default rate, and loss severity on a loan level basis. The
Corporation modeled the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage
collateral using a static cash flow analysis according to
collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan
term, current balance, note rate, rate adjustment type, rate
adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with
prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available
prepayment model (ADCO). The variable cash flow of the security
is modeled using the
3-month
LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were driven by the
combination of default and loss severity estimates, taking into
account loan credit characteristics
(loan-to-value,
state, origination date, property type, occupancy loan purpose,
documentation type,
debt-to-income
ratio, other) to provide an estimate of default and loss
severity. Refer to
Note 4-
Investment securities for additional information about
assumptions used in the valuation of private label MBS.
Other
equity securities
Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available
fair value are stated at the net realizable value, which
management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value.
This category is principally composed of stock that is owned by
the Corporation to comply with FHLB regulatory requirements.
Their realizable value equals their cost as these shares can be
freely redeemed at par.
Loans
receivable, including loans held for sale
The fair value of all loans was estimated using discounted cash
flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for
loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments
that the Corporations management believes a market
participant would consider in determining fair value. Loans were
classified by type such as commercial, residential mortgage,
credit cards and automobile. These asset categories were further
segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate categories. The fair
values of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans were
calculated by discounting expected cash flows through the
estimated maturity date. Loans with no stated maturity, like
credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment assumptions
were considered for non-residential loans. For residential
mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on prepayment
experiences of generic U.S. mortgage-backed securities
pools with similar characteristics (e.g. coupon and original
term) and adjusted based on the Corporations historical
data. Discount rates were based on the Treasury and LIBOR/Swap
Yield Curves at the date of the analysis, and included
appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and
liquidity. For impaired collateral dependent
43
loans, the impairment was primarily measured based on the fair
value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observable transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations.
Deposits
The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings
accounts, which are deposits with no defined maturities, equals
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For deposits
with stated maturities, but that reprice at least quarterly, the
fair value is also estimated to be the recorded amounts at the
reporting date. The fair values of retail fixed-rate time
deposits, with stated maturities, are based on the present value
of the future cash flows expected to be paid on the deposits.
The cash flows were based on contractual maturities; no early
repayments are assumed. Discount rates were based on the LIBOR
yield curve.
The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair
value of core deposit intangibles, which represent the value of
the customer relationship measured by the value of demand
deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of
interest and do not fluctuate in response to changes in interest
rates.
The fair value of brokered CDs, which are included within
deposits, is determined using discounted cash flow analyses over
the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a Hull-White
Interest Rate Tree approach, an industry-standard approach
for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The
fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding
principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar
LIBOR and swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of
nonperformance, since brokered CDs are generally participated
out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and insured by
the FDIC.
Loans
payable
Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED
Discount Window Program. Due to the short-term nature of these
borrowings, their outstanding balances are estimated to be the
fair value.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
Some repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their
outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value. Where
longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated using
exit price indications of the cost of unwinding the transactions
as of the end of the reporting period. Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by investment
securities.
Advances
from FHLB
The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is
determined using discounted cash flow analyses over the full
term of the borrowings, using indications of the fair value of
similar transactions. The cash flows assume no early repayment
of the borrowings. Discount rates are based on the LIBOR yield
curve. For advances from FHLB that reprice quarterly, their
outstanding balances are estimated to be their fair value.
Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans
and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.
Derivative
instruments
The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on
observable market parameters and takes into consideration the
credit risk component of paying counterparties when appropriate,
except when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate
swaps, the credit risk of both counterparties is included in the
valuation; and on options and caps, only the sellers
credit risk is considered. The Hull-White Interest Rate
Tree approach is used to value the option components of
derivative instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is
performed using US dollar LIBOR-based discount rates or yield
curves that account for the industry sector and the credit
rating of the counterparty
and/or the
Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for
protection against rising interest rates and, prior to
June 30, 2009, included interest rate swaps to
44
economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these
interest rate swaps, a credit component was not considered in
the valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized
with investment securities any mark to market loss with the
counterparty and, if there were market gains, the counterparty
had to deliver collateral to the Corporation.
Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case
with derivative instruments named as reference caps,
are valued using models that consider unobservable market
parameters (Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to
hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label
mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount
of the underlying fixed-rate mortgage loans originated in the
United States. Significant inputs used for fair value
determination consist of specific characteristics such as
information used in the prepayment model which follows the
amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an
unobservable input. The valuation model uses the Black formula,
which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The
Black formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for
valuing stock options except that the spot price of the
underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula
uses as inputs the strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates,
volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate the option
value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg
L.P. (Bloomberg) every day and are used to build a
zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The
discount factor is then calculated from the zero coupon curve.
The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the rate is
reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are
made at the end of each period. The cash flow of each caplet is
then discounted from each payment date.
Although most of the derivative instruments are fully
collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are
not secured in full. The cumulative
mark-to-market
effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments
resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately
$0.5 million as of March 31, 2010, which includes an
unrealized loss of $0.1 million recorded in the first
quarter of 2010 and an unrealized loss of $0.5 million for
the first quarter of 2009.
Term
notes payable
The fair value of term notes is determined using a discounted
cash flow analysis over the full term of the borrowings. This
valuation also uses the Hull-White Interest Rate
Tree approach to value the option components of the term
notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are exercised
economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed
using the notional amount outstanding. The discount rates used
in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates.
At-the-money
implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time
to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to current market
prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes. For
the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the
difference in yield curves between swap rates and a yield curve
that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation
as issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to
maturity of the note and option. The net loss from fair value
changes attributable to the Corporations own credit to the
medium-term notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair
value option recorded for the first quarter of 2010 amounted to
$1.0 million, compared to an unrealized gain of
$0.3 million for the first quarter of 2009. The cumulative
mark-to-market
unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since measured at fair
value attributable to credit risk amounted to $1.6 million
as of March 31, 2010.
Other
borrowings
Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures.
Projected cash flows from the debentures were discounted using
the LIBOR yield curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread
was estimated using the difference in yield curves between Swap
rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit
rating of the Corporation (US Finance BB) as issuer of the note
at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the debentures.
45
20
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flow information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings
|
|
$
|
98,088
|
|
|
$
|
158,578
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to other real estate owned
|
|
|
18,930
|
|
|
|
25,402
|
|
Additions to auto repossesion
|
|
|
18,909
|
|
|
|
19,626
|
|
Capitalization of servicing assets
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Loan securitizations
|
|
|
57,204
|
|
|
|
73,411
|
|
21
SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based upon the Corporations organizational structure and
the information provided to the Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the
operating segments are driven primarily by the
Corporations lines of business for its operations in
Puerto Rico, the Corporations principal market, and by
geographic areas for its operations outside of Puerto Rico. As
of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had six reportable
segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking;
Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United
States operations and Virgin Islands operations. Management
determined the reportable segments based on the internal
reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to
allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporations
organizational chart, nature of the products, distribution
channels and the economic characteristics of the products were
also considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
Starting in the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation
realigned its reporting segments to better reflect how it views
and manages its business. Two additional operating segments were
created to evaluate the operations conducted by the Corporation,
outside of Puerto Rico. Operations conducted in the United
States and in the Virgin Islands are now individually evaluated
as separate operating segments. This realignment in the segment
reporting essentially reflects the effect of restructuring
initiatives, including the merger of FirstBank Florida
operations with and into FirstBank, and will allow the
Corporation to better present the results from its growth focus.
Prior to the third quarter of 2009, the operating segments were
driven primarily by the Corporations legal entities.
FirstBank operations conducted in the Virgin Islands and through
its loan production office in Miami, Florida were reflected in
the Corporations then four reportable segments (Commercial
and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail)
Banking; Treasury and Investments) while the operations
conducted by FirstBank Florida were reported as part of a
category named Other. In the third quarter of 2009,
as a result of the aforementioned merger, the operations of
FirstBank Florida were reported as part of the four reportable
segments. Starting in the first quarter of 2010, activities
related to auto floor plan financings previously included as
part of Consumer (Retail) Banking are now included as part of
the Commercial and Corporate Banking segment. The changes in the
fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010 reflected a
further realignment of the organizational structure as a result
of management changes. Prior period amounts have been
reclassified to conform to current period presentation. These
changes did not have an impact on the previously reported
consolidated results of the Corporation.
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the
Corporations lending and other services for large
customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients
and the public sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real
estate and construction loans, and floor plan financings as well
as other products such as cash management and business
46
management services. The Mortgage Banking segments
operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a
variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking
segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary
markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes
mortgage loans purchased from other local banks and mortgage
bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the
Corporations consumer lending and deposit taking
activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan
centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for
the Corporations investment portfolio and treasury
functions executed to manage and enhance liquidity. This segment
lends funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage
Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their
lending activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer
(Retail) Banking segment also lends funds to other segments. The
interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments
and the Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based
on market rates. The difference between the allocated interest
income or expense and the Corporations actual net interest
income from centralized management of funding costs is reported
in the Treasury and Investments segment. The United States
operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted
by FirstBank in the United States mainland, including commercial
and retail banking services. The Virgin Islands operations
segment consists of all banking activities conducted by the
Corporation in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands,
including commercial and retail banking services and insurance
activities.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
referred to in Note 1 to the Corporations financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 contained
in the Corporations Annual Report or
Form 10-K.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based
on net interest income, the estimated provision for loan and
lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest
expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average
volume of their interest-earning assets less the allowance for
loan and lease losses.
47
The following table presents information about the reportable
segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Commercial and
|
|
|
Treasury and
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
(Retail) Banking
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
39,924
|
|
|
$
|
47,537
|
|
|
$
|
58,970
|
|
|
$
|
42,774
|
|
|
$
|
13,930
|
|
|
$
|
17,853
|
|
|
$
|
220,988
|
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
|
|
|
(33,769
|
)
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
(9,100
|
)
|
|
|
40,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,740
|
)
|
|
|
(11,267
|
)
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
|
(104,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
6,155
|
|
|
|
36,821
|
|
|
|
49,870
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
2,663
|
|
|
|
16,303
|
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(16,015
|
)
|
|
|
(12,494
|
)
|
|
|
(59,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,201
|
)
|
|
|
(11,808
|
)
|
|
|
(170,965
|
)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
2,251
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
30,585
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses
|
|
|
(8,078
|
)
|
|
|
(23,961
|
)
|
|
|
(17,586
|
)
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
(9,318
|
)
|
|
|
(11,026
|
)
|
|
|
(71,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(15,687
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,674
|
|
|
$
|
(25,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,003
|
|
|
$
|
(77,702
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets
|
|
$
|
2,708,763
|
|
|
$
|
1,667,043
|
|
|
$
|
6,452,243
|
|
|
$
|
5,466,721
|
|
|
$
|
1,261,836
|
|
|
$
|
1,041,767
|
|
|
$
|
18,598,373
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
39,480
|
|
|
$
|
51,369
|
|
|
$
|
60,657
|
|
|
$
|
69,756
|
|
|
$
|
19,302
|
|
|
$
|
17,759
|
|
|
$
|
258,323
|
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds
|
|
|
(29,131
|
)
|
|
|
(1,332
|
)
|
|
|
(26,295
|
)
|
|
|
56,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,772
|
)
|
|
|
(13,870
|
)
|
|
|
(3,070
|
)
|
|
|
(136,725
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
10,349
|
|
|
|
34,024
|
|
|
|
34,362
|
|
|
|
22,742
|
|
|
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
14,689
|
|
|
|
121,598
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(8,017
|
)
|
|
|
(3,050
|
)
|
|
|
(27,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,065
|
)
|
|
|
(6,104
|
)
|
|
|
(59,429
|
)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
7,832
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
17,523
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
30,053
|
|
Direct non-interest expenses
|
|
|
(7,029
|
)
|
|
|
(23,671
|
)
|
|
|
(8,738
|
)
|
|
|
(1,722
|
)
|
|
|
(11,222
|
)
|
|
|
(11,508
|
)
|
|
|
(63,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
|
$
|
(323
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,543
|
|
|
$
|
(20,744
|
)
|
|
$
|
(444
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets
|
|
$
|
2,625,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,831,093
|
|
|
$
|
6,088,032
|
|
|
$
|
5,558,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,488,748
|
|
|
$
|
992,847
|
|
|
$
|
18,585,405
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable
segment financial information to the consolidated totals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income for segments and other
|
|
$
|
(80,378
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,332
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
(19,760
|
)
|
|
|
(20,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
(100,138
|
)
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
14,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets for segments
|
|
$
|
18,598,373
|
|
|
$
|
18,585,405
|
|
Average non-earning assets
|
|
|
716,679
|
|
|
|
724,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated average assets
|
|
$
|
19,315,052
|
|
|
$
|
19,310,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
22
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation enters into financial instruments with
off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet
the financing needs of its customers. These financial
instruments may include commitments to extend credit and
commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value. As of
March 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit amounted to
approximately $1.3 billion and standby letters of credit
amounted to approximately $97.5 million. Commitments to
extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any conditions established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses. For most of the commercial lines of
credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the
agreement prior to additional disbursements. In the case of
credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can
at any time and without cause, cancel the unused credit
facility. Generally, the Corporations mortgage banking
activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with
prospective borrowers.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate
swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed
to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation,
which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate
swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate
swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties
under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the
unpaid net cash settlement due as of March 31, 2010 under
the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured
counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This
exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with
Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in
the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of
pledged securities with Lehman as of March 31, 2010
amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as
collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate
given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a
performance guarantee under the swap agreements, was not part of
a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never
transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate
swap agreements, Lehmans obligation was to return the
collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc.,
acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a
custodial account at JP Morgan/ Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided
instructions to have most of the securities transferred to
Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal
to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month
of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays Capital
in federal court in New York demanding the return of the
securities.
During the month of February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with
the court requesting that the Corporations claim be
dismissed on the grounds that the allegations of the complaint
are not sufficient to justify the granting of the remedies
therein sought. Shortly thereafter, the Corporation filed its
opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on
April 28, 2010. The court on that date, after hearing the
arguments by both sides, concluded that the Corporations
equitable based causes of actions, upon which the return of the
investment securities are being demanded, contain allegations
that sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of
Barclays motion to dismiss the Corporations claim.
Accordingly, the judge ordered the case to proceed to trial. A
scheduling conference for purposes of having the parties agree
to a discovery time table has been set for June 1, 2010.
While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support
its claim for the return of the securities, no assurances can be
given that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation against
Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial portion
of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim
filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities
Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. An estimated
loss was not accrued as the Corporation is unable to determine
the timing of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in
recovering all or a substantial portion of the collateral or its
equivalent value. If additional relevant negative facts become
available in future periods, a need to recognize a partial or
full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that the
investment securities have not
49
yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in
this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such
investments as non-performing during the second quarter of 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries
were defendants in various legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations financial position or results
of operations.
23
FIRST BANCORP (Holding Company Only) Financial
Information
The following condensed financial information presents the
financial position of the Holding Company only as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the results
of its operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
54,192
|
|
|
$
|
55,423
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity
|
|
|
1,645,067
|
|
|
|
1,754,217
|
|
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity
|
|
|
7,177
|
|
|
|
6,709
|
|
Investment in PR Finance, at equity
|
|
|
3,110
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,721,969
|
|
|
$
|
1,831,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
$
|
231,959
|
|
|
$
|
231,959
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
233,426
|
|
|
|
232,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
1,721,969
|
|
|
$
|
1,831,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on other investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Dividends from FirstBank Puerto Rico
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
19,977
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
20,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
2,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on investments and impairments
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(2,160
|
)
|
|
|
16,813
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(104,839
|
)
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has performed an evaluation of events occurring
subsequent to March 31, 2010, management has determined
that there are no events occurring in this period that required
disclosure in or adjustment to the accompanying financial
statements.
51
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (MD&A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)
|
|
|
Condensed Income Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
220,988
|
|
|
$
|
258,323
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
136,725
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
121,598
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
59,429
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
30,053
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
84,528
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(100,138
|
)
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
14,197
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
21,891
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
6,773
|
|
Per Common Share Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share basic
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Net (loss) income per share diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Average shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
Average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
6.04
|
|
|
$
|
11.37
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
10.86
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets
|
|
|
(2.25
|
)
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Interest Rate Spread(2)
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
Net Interest Margin(2)
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
Return on Average Total Equity
|
|
|
(27.07
|
)
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
Return on Average Common Equity
|
|
|
(68.06
|
)
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
9.73
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio(1)
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.72
|
|
Efficiency ratio(3)
|
|
|
56.33
|
|
|
|
55.74
|
|
Asset Quality:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans
|
|
|
3.65
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs
|
|
|
138.12
|
|
|
|
154.66
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
9.49
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans receivable
|
|
|
12.35
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
Allowance to total non-performing loans
|
|
|
35.09
|
|
|
|
42.49
|
|
Allowance to total non-performing loans excluding residential
real estate loans
|
|
|
48.24
|
|
|
|
76.28
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Price: End of period
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
13,293,494
|
|
|
$
|
13,533,087
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
575,303
|
|
|
|
302,531
|
|
Money market and investment securities
|
|
|
4,760,247
|
|
|
|
5,506,997
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
44,032
|
|
|
|
47,371
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
104,457
|
|
|
|
140,851
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
|
19,709,150
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
11,619,348
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
4,320,712
|
|
|
|
5,903,751
|
|
Total preferred equity
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
925,162
|
|
Total common equity
|
|
|
535,935
|
|
|
|
969,327
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
82,751
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
1,977,240
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-GAAP measure. Refer to Capital discussion below
for additional information of the components and reconciliation
of these measures. |
|
(2) |
|
On a tax- equivalent basis and excluding the changes in fair
value of derivative instruments and financial liabilities
measured at fair value (see Net Interest Income
discussion below for a reconciliation of this non- gaap measure). |
|
(3) |
|
Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-
interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring income
and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and
financial liabilities measured at fair value. |
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the
accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements of
First BanCorp (the Corporation or First
BanCorp) and should be read in conjunction with the
interim unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company
headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full
range of financial products to consumers and commercial
customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the
holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank
or the Bank), Grupo Empresas de Servicios
Financieros (d/b/a PR Finance Group) and FirstBank
Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the
Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States
and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA)
specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan
originations, finance leases, personal loans, small loans, auto
loans, insurance agency and broker-dealer activities.
Consolidation
of the Puerto Rico Banking Industry
Significant changes took place in the Puerto Rico banking market
at the end of the day on April 30, 2010. Three banks on the
island, all operating under consent orders, ceased operations by
order of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions in Puerto
Rico. The FDIC was appointed receiver for all three banks. The
deposits and assets of these three banks were acquired
immediately from the FDIC as receiver by three other local banks
in Puerto Rico. The combined assets of these three shuttered
institutions were approximately one quarter of the total
commercial banking assets in Puerto Rico.
The Corporation believes that the reduced number of competitors
in the Puerto Rico market will provide opportunities for
continued rationalization of both asset and liability pricing.
In addition, the Corporation sees potential for organic share
growth, and therefore will continue its successful deposit and
customer acquisition
53
strategies. First BanCorp will seek additional lending
opportunities in selected business segments, with both present
and potential customers.
OVERVIEW
OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
First BanCorps results of operations generally depend
primarily upon its net interest income, which is the difference
between the interest income earned on its interest-earning
assets, including investment securities and loans, and the
interest expense incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities,
including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is
affected by various factors, including: the interest rate
scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing
characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The
Corporations results of operations also depend on the
provision for loan and lease losses, which significantly
affected the results for the first quarter ended March 31,
2010, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy,
insurance premiums and other costs), non-interest income (mainly
service charges and fees on loans and deposits and insurance
income), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses)
on investments, gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities,
and income taxes.
Net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 amounted to
$107.0 million or $(1.22) per diluted common share,
compared to net income of $21.9 million or $0.07 per
diluted common share for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
The Corporations financial results for the first quarter
of 2010, as compared to the first quarter of 2009, were
principally impacted by (i) an increase of
$111.5 million in the provision for loan and lease losses
associated with the increase in the volume of non-performing and
impaired loans that required additions to specific reserves and
adjustments to loss factors used to determine general reserves
to account for increases in charge-offs and for sustained weak
economic conditions, (ii) a decrease of $21.1 million
in income tax benefit, affected by a non-cash increase of
$40.9 million in the Corporations deferred tax asset
valuation allowance as most of the deferred tax assets created
in 2010 were fully reserved, (iii) an increase of
$6.8 million in non-interest expenses driven by an increase
of $11.8 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium
partially offset by reductions in employees compensation
and benefit expenses and business promotions as well as lower
losses related to real estate owned (REO) operations, and
(iv) an unfavorable variance of $5.4 million in fair
value adjustments related to derivative instruments and certain
financial liabilities. These factors were partially offset by an
increase of $15.3 million in non-interest income primarily
due to a gain of $10.7 million on the sale of the remaining
VISA Class C shares, higher gains on the sale of
U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS),
and higher gains from mortgage banking activities.
The key drivers of the Corporations financial results for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
was $116.9 million, compared to $121.6 million for the
same period in 2009. The decrease is mainly associated with an
adverse fluctuation of $5.4 million in the market value of
derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at
fair value. Excluding fair value adjustments, net interest
income increased by $0.6 million to $118.6 million for
the first quarter of 2010 from $118.0 million for the first
quarter of 2009. The net interest margin, on an adjusted
tax-equivalent basis, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
was 2.73% compared to 2.85% for the same period in 2009. The
slight increase in absolute terms was mainly related to the
favorable impact of lower deposit pricing and the strong core
deposit growth that mitigated margin compressions related to the
higher non-accrual loan levels, that more than double the
year-ago level, offset by the adverse impact of maintaining
higher than normal liquidity levels. Refer to the Net
Interest Income discussion below for additional
information.
|
|
|
|
For the first quarter of 2010, the Corporations provision
for loan and lease losses amounted to $171.0 million,
compared to $59.4 million for the same period in 2009.
Refer to the discussion under Risk Management below
for an analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and
non-performing assets and related ratios. The increase in the
provision for 2010 was primarily due to increases to specific
reserves on impaired loans, adversely impacted by lower
collateral values, as well as increases in charge-offs and the
sustained deterioration of economic conditions that have caused
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
increases in reserve loss factors used to determine general
reserves. Much of the increase in the provision is related to
the construction, commercial and residential mortgage loans
portfolio in both the Puerto Rico and Florida market. The
Corporations net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2010
were $123.8 million or 3.65% of average loans on an
annualized basis, compared to $38.4 million or 1.16% of
average loans on an annualized basis for the same period in
2009. Net charge-offs of all major loan categories, with the
exception of consumer loans, experienced significant increases.
Refer to the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses and
Risk Management Non-performing assets and
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses sections below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the
Corporations non-interest income amounted to
$45.3 million, compared to $30.0 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009. The increase was mainly due
to a gain of $10.7 million on the sale of the remaining
VISA Class C shares, an increase of $2.9 million on
realized gains on the sale of other investment securities
(mainly U.S. agency MBS), and a $1.7 million increase
in gains from mortgage banking activities as lower prepayment
rates positively impacted the value of servicing assets. Refer
to the Non Interest Income discussion below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses for the first quarter of 2010 amounted to
$91.4 million, compared to $84.5 million for the same
period in 2009. The increase is mainly related to an increase of
$11.8 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium and a
$2.1 million increase in professional fees as the
Corporation continued the implementation of key business
strategies and dealing with higher legal expenses in workout and
foreclosure procedures. This was partially offset by a decrease
of $2.5 million in employees compensation, a
$1.7 million reduction in losses on REO operations, a
$0.9 million decrease in business promotion expenses and
the impact in 2009 of a $3.8 million impairment charge
associated with the core deposit intangible assets in its
Florida operations. Refer to the Non Interest
Expenses discussion below for additional information.
|
|
|
|
For the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation recorded an
income tax expense of $6.9 million, compared to an income
tax benefit of $14.2 million for the same period in 2009.
The variance is mainly due to increases in the valuation
allowance against deferred tax asset. Most of the deferred tax
assets created in 2010 were fully reserved. Refer to the
Income Taxes discussion below for additional
information.
|
|
|
|
Total assets as of March 31, 2010 amounted to
$18.9 billion, a decrease of $777.5 million compared
to total assets as of December 31, 2009. The decrease in
total assets was primarily a result of a decrease of
$736.7 million in investment securities and a net decrease
of $702.9 million in the loan portfolio, partially offset
by an increase of $626.1 million in cash and cash
equivalents. The decrease in assets is consistent with the
Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet to,
among other things and in line with market trends, strengthen
its capital position. With respect to cash and cash equivalents
amounts, a key objective in 2010 was to strengthen balance sheet
liquidity due to potential disruptions from the consolidation of
the Puerto Rico banking industry. Refer to the Financial
Condition and Operating Data discussion below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, total liabilities amounted to
$17.4 billion, a decrease of approximately
$667.0 million, as compared to $18.0 billion as of
December 31, 2009. The decrease in total liabilities is
mainly attributable to a decrease of $576.6 million in
repurchase agreements, mainly maturing short-term repurchase
agreements, and a decrease of $300 million in advances from
the Federal Reserve (FED). This was partially offset
by an increase of $209.2 million in total deposits, mainly
core deposits in both the Florida and Puerto Rico markets.
Brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) decreased by
$209.1 million. Refer to the Risk
Management Liquidity and Capital Adequacy
discussion below for additional information about the
Corporations funding sources.
|
|
|
|
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to
$1.5 billion as of March 31, 2010, a decrease of
$110.5 million compared to the balance as of
December 31, 2009, driven by the net loss of
$107.0 million for the first quarter, as well as a decrease
of $3.5 million in accumulated other comprehensive income.
As previously reported, the Corporation decided to suspend the
payment of common and preferred dividends, effective with the
preferred dividend for the month of August 2009.
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to the Risk Management Capital
section below for additional information, including information
about strategies to increase the Corporations common
equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan production, including purchases, for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 was $637 million, compared to
$1.3 billion for the comparable period in 2009. The
decrease in loan production during 2010, as compared to the
first quarter of 2009, was mainly associated with the reduction
in credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and
in construction loan originations.
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans as of March 31, 2010 were
$1.63 billion, compared to $1.56 billion as of
December 31, 2009. The increase of $75.5 million, or
4.83%, in non-accrual loans from December 31, 2009 was led
by increases in construction and commercial mortgage loans.
Total non-accrual construction loans increased
$51.1 million, or 8%, from December 31, 2009 mainly
concentrated in three relationships in Puerto Rico. Non-accrual
commercial mortgage loans increased by $33.9 million, or
17%, from the end of the year 2009 spread through the
Corporations geographic segments. Non-accrual residential
mortgage loans increased by $5.0 million mainly in Puerto
Rico, which was adversely affected by the continued trend of
higher unemployment rates affecting consumers, partially offset
by a decrease in the Florida portfolio. Non-accrual commercial
and industrial (C&I) loans decreased by $13.2 million,
including a $15.0 million charge-off associated with a loan
extended to a local financial institution in Puerto Rico. The
levels of non-accrual consumer loans, including finance leases,
remained stable showing a $1.4 million decrease during the
first quarter of 2010. Refer to the Risk Management
Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets section below for
additional information.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of
applying these principles conform with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
The Corporations critical accounting policies relate to
the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses;
2) other-than-temporary
impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and
related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of
financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments;
and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical
accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions
made by management that affect the recorded assets and
liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as
of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or
conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require
greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and
judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing
results that could be materially different than those originally
reported.
The Corporations critical accounting policies are
described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in First
BanCorps 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
There have not been any material changes in the
Corporations critical accounting policies since
December 31, 2009.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Net
Interest Income
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First
BanCorp on its interest-earning assets over the interest
incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First
BanCorps net interest income is subject to interest rate
risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the
Corporations assets and liabilities. Net interest income
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was
$116.9 million compared to $121.6 million for the
comparable period in 2009. On a tax-equivalent basis and
excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments and unrealized gains and losses on liabilities
measured at fair value, net interest income for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 was $128.5 million compared to
$132.4 million for the comparable period of 2009.
The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest
income. Part I presents average volumes and rates on an
adjusted tax-equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on
an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, the
56
extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume
of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the
Corporations net interest income. For each category of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities,
information is provided on changes attributable to
(i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by
prior period rates), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in
rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume variances
(changes in rate multiplied by changes in volume) have been
allocated to the changes in volume and rate based upon their
respective percentage of the combined totals.
The net interest income is computed on an adjusted
tax-equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this
non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding:
(1) the change in the fair value of derivative instruments
and (2) unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured
at fair value.
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume
|
|
|
Interest Income(1) /Expense
|
|
|
Average Rate(1)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
904,600
|
|
|
$
|
114,837
|
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
Government obligations(2)
|
|
|
1,283,568
|
|
|
|
1,141,091
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
19,601
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
%
|
|
|
6.97
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,266,239
|
|
|
|
4,254,355
|
|
|
|
40,582
|
|
|
|
63,421
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
%
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
7,711
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
68,380
|
|
|
|
71,119
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments(3)
|
|
|
5,526,589
|
|
|
|
5,591,473
|
|
|
|
50,725
|
|
|
|
83,524
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
3,554,096
|
|
|
|
3,496,429
|
|
|
|
53,599
|
|
|
|
54,049
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
6.27
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,483,314
|
|
|
|
1,545,731
|
|
|
|
8,753
|
|
|
|
14,102
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
6,652,754
|
|
|
|
6,110,754
|
|
|
|
67,404
|
|
|
|
64,145
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
%
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
313,899
|
|
|
|
360,276
|
|
|
|
6,343
|
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
8.20
|
%
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,565,404
|
|
|
|
1,725,350
|
|
|
|
44,820
|
|
|
|
48,594
|
|
|
|
11.61
|
%
|
|
|
11.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans(4)(5)
|
|
|
13,569,467
|
|
|
|
13,238,540
|
|
|
|
180,919
|
|
|
|
188,472
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
%
|
|
|
5.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
19,096,056
|
|
|
$
|
18,830,013
|
|
|
$
|
231,644
|
|
|
$
|
271,996
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs
|
|
$
|
7,452,195
|
|
|
$
|
7,461,148
|
|
|
$
|
44,382
|
|
|
$
|
72,833
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
Other interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
4,678,391
|
|
|
|
4,027,725
|
|
|
|
21,583
|
|
|
|
25,192
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
%
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
804,444
|
|
|
|
297,556
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
3,004,155
|
|
|
|
3,651,695
|
|
|
|
27,300
|
|
|
|
32,922
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
3.66
|
%
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
971,596
|
|
|
|
1,246,373
|
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
8,292
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
|
|
2.70
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities(6)
|
|
$
|
16,910,781
|
|
|
$
|
16,684,497
|
|
|
$
|
103,136
|
|
|
$
|
139,585
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
128,508
|
|
|
$
|
132,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis. The adjusted tax-equivalent
yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate spread on
exempt assets by 1 less Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as
adjusted for changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the
Corporations subsidiaries other than IBEs and 35.95% for
the Corporations IBEs) and adding to it the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities. The tax-equivalent adjustment
recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and
tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a |
57
|
|
|
|
|
standard practice in the banking industry to present net
interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin on
a fully tax-equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes
these measures provide useful information to investors by
allowing them to make peer comparisons. Changes in the fair
value of derivative and unrealized gains or losses on
liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from interest
income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do
not affect interest paid or received. |
|
(2) |
|
Government obligations include debt issued by government
sponsored agencies. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses in
available-for-sale
securities are excluded from the average volumes. |
|
(4) |
|
Average loan balances include the average of non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest income on loans includes $3.1 million and
$2.8 million for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009,
respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees
related to the Corporations loan portfolio. |
|
(6) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair
value are excluded from the average volumes. |
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010 Compared to 2009
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Due to:
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
(163
|
)
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
Government obligations
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
(12,593
|
)
|
|
|
(10,781
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
(13,301
|
)
|
|
|
(9,538
|
)
|
|
|
(22,839
|
)
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
(11,067
|
)
|
|
|
(21,732
|
)
|
|
|
(32,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
(549
|
)
|
|
|
(4,800
|
)
|
|
|
(5,349
|
)
|
C&I and commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
(1,239
|
)
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
(4,579
|
)
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
(3,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
(8,020
|
)
|
|
|
(7,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
(10,600
|
)
|
|
|
(29,752
|
)
|
|
|
(40,352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(28,364
|
)
|
|
|
(28,451
|
)
|
Other interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,610
|
|
|
|
(7,219
|
)
|
|
|
(3,609
|
)
|
Loan payable
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
(5,904
|
)
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
(5,622
|
)
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
(2,026
|
)
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
(598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
(3,378
|
)
|
|
|
(33,071
|
)
|
|
|
(36,449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
|
(7,222
|
)
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
|
|
(3,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the Corporations interest-earning assets,
mostly investments in obligations of some U.S. Government
agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is
exempt from income tax,
58
principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of
investments held by the Corporations international banking
entities are tax-exempt under the Puerto Rico tax law, except
for a temporary 5% tax rate imposed by the Puerto Rico
Government on IBEs net income effective for years that
commenced after December 31, 2008 and before
January 1, 2012 (refer to the Income Taxes discussion below
for additional information). To facilitate the comparison of all
interest data related to these assets, the interest income has
been converted to an adjusted taxable equivalent basis. The tax
equivalent yield was estimated by dividing the interest rate
spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax
rate as adjusted for changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for
the Corporations subsidiaries other than IBEs and 35.95%
for the Corporations IBEs) and adding to it the average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers
the interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax
law. Refer to the Income Taxes discussion below for
additional information of the Puerto Rico tax law.
The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of
the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and
unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value
(valuations) provides additional information about
the Corporations net interest income and facilitates
comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the
derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on
liabilities measured at fair value have no effect on interest
due or interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or
interest-earning assets, respectively, or on interest payments
exchanged with derivatives counterparties.
59
The following table reconciles net interest income in accordance
with GAAP to net interest income excluding valuations, and to
net interest income on an adjusted tax-equivalent basis and net
interest rate spread and net interest margin on a GAAP basis to
these items excluding valuations and on an adjusted
tax-equivalent basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest Income GAAP
|
|
$
|
220,988
|
|
|
$
|
258,323
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income excluding valuations
|
|
|
221,732
|
|
|
|
257,548
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
9,912
|
|
|
|
14,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding valuations
|
|
|
231,644
|
|
|
|
271,996
|
|
Interest Expense GAAP
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
136,725
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments and liabilities
measured at fair value
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense excluding valuations
|
|
|
103,136
|
|
|
|
139,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income GAAP
|
|
$
|
116,863
|
|
|
$
|
121,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income excluding valuations
|
|
$
|
118,596
|
|
|
$
|
117,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis excluding
valuations
|
|
$
|
128,508
|
|
|
$
|
132,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
$
|
19,096,055
|
|
|
$
|
18,830,013
|
|
Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
$
|
16,910,781
|
|
|
$
|
16,684,497
|
|
Average rate on interest-earning assets GAAP
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-earning assets excluding valuations
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
5.54
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-earning assets on a tax-equivalent
basis and excluding valuations
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities GAAP
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
Net interest spread GAAP
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
Net interest spread excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
Net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding
valuations
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
Net interest margin GAAP
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
Net interest margin excluding valuations
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis and excluding
valuations
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in
fair values of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, which
are included in interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivtives (economic undesignated
hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
$
|
(731
|
)
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
Interest rate swaps on loans
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges)
|
|
$
|
(744
|
)
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
The following table summarizes the components of the net
unrealized gain and loss on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges) and net unrealized gain and loss on liabilities measured
at fair value which are included in interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps and options on brokered CDs and stock index
deposits
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4,426
|
|
Interest rate swaps and options on medium-term notes measured at
fair value and stock index notes payable
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges)
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on brokered CDs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,141
|
)
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on medium-term notes
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
$
|
(7,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated
hedges) and liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
|
$
|
(2,860
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents
interest earned on loans receivable and investment securities.
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily
represents interest paid on brokered CDs, branch-based deposits,
repurchase agreements, advances from the FHLB and FED and notes
payable.
Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represent changes in
the fair value of derivatives, primarily interest rate caps and
swaps used for protection against rising interest rates and for
2009 mainly related to interest rate swaps that economically
hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. All interest rate
swaps related to brokered CDs were called during the course of
2009 due to the low level of interest rates and, as a
consequence, the Corporation exercised its call option on the
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs that were recorded at fair value.
Unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value
represent the change in the fair value of such liabilities
(medium-term notes and brokered CDs), other than the accrual of
interests.
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject
to market risk. While the Corporation does have certain trading
derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the Corporation
does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative
purposes. As of March 31, 2010, most of the interest rate
swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising
interest rates. In the past, the volume of interest rate swaps
was much higher, as they were used to convert the fixed-rate of
a large portfolio of brokered CDs, mainly those with long-term
maturities, to a variable rate and to mitigate the interest rate
risk related to variable rate loans. Refer to Note 8 of the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for
further details concerning the notional amounts of derivative
instruments and additional information. As is the case with
investment securities, the market value of derivative
instruments is largely a function of the financial markets
expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates.
Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily
indicative of the future impact of derivative instruments on net
interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on the
shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well
as the expectations for rates in the future.
Net interest income decreased 4% to $116.9 million for the
first quarter of 2010 from $121.6 million in the first
quarter of 2009. This reduction reflects the impact of an
adverse fluctuation of $5.4 million in the market value of
derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at
fair value, of which $2.7 million was related to net
unrealized gains on brokered CDs measured at fair value and
related interest rate swaps
61
recorded in the first quarter of 2009 that were not recorded in
2010 since these instruments were all called during the course
of 2009. Excluding valuations, net interest income increased by
$0.6 million to $118.6 million for the first quarter
of 2010 from $118.0 million for the first quarter of 2009.
The slight increase in net interest income was mainly related to
lower pricing on both brokered CDs and core deposits that more
than offset declines in loan yields and lower yields on
investments. The weighted-average cost of brokered CDs decreased
by 154 basis points to 2.42% for the first quarter of 2010
from 3.96% for the same period a year ago primarily due to the
replacement of maturing or callable brokered CDs that had
interest rates above current market rates with shorter-term
brokered CDs and low-cost sources of funding such as advances
from the FED.
Almost entirely offsetting the benefit from lower pricing on
deposits was the decline in the average volume of investments
securities resulting from the Corporations strategy to
deleverage its balance sheet to further strengthen its capital
position, the negative impact on net interest margin of
maintaining a higher liquidity position and lower loans yields
due to increases in non-performing loans. The average volume of
investment securities decreased by $854.6 million
reflecting the impact of the sale of approximately
$1.7 billion of MBS (mainly 30 year U.S. Agency
MBS) with an average yield of 5.44% and the sale of
approximately $200 million of U.S. Treasury and Puerto
Rico Government obligations completed after March 31, 2009.
Even though approximately $1.25 billion were replaced
primarily by 15 year U.S. agency MBS, proceeds from
sales and repayments of MBS were used, in part, to increase
liquidity levels as reflected in an increase of
$789.8 million in the average volume of money market,
short-term investments and overnight funds.
During the first quarter of 2010, a key objective was to
strengthen balance sheet liquidity due to potential disruptions
from the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking industry.
Consequently, the Corporation increased its investments in
overnight funds. Liquidity volumes are significantly higher than
normalized levels as reflected in the period-end cash and cash
equivalents balance of $1.3 billion, an increase of
$626 million since December 2009 and well in excess of
historical average balances of approximately $450 million
over the last three years. Subsequent to the consolidation of
the Puerto Rico banking industry that took place on
April 30, 2010, no disruptions have been noted.
Also contributing to pressures on the net interest margin,
which, when excluding valuation adjustments remained almost
unchanged from 2.54% for the first quarter of 2009 to 2.52% for
the first quarter of 2010, were lower loan yields. The yields on
average loans decreased 36 basis points to 5.41% for the
first quarter of 2010 from 5.77% for the same period a year ago.
Lower loan yields were primarily due to the significant increase
in non-accrual loans that more than doubled year-ago levels and
declines in market interest rates that affected the interest
income from variable rate loans. Most of the commercial and
construction loans are tied to short-term indexes, but the
Corporation continues with its measures to improve loan pricing
and is actively increasing spreads on loan renewals. Also, the
Corporation increased the use of interest rate floors in new
commercial and construction loan agreements and renewals to
protect net interest margins.
On an adjusted tax-equivalent basis, net interest income
decreased by $3.90 million, or 3%, for the first quarter of
2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease for the
first quarter of 2010, as compared to the corresponding period
of 2009, was principally due to a decrease of $4.5 million
in the tax-equivalent adjustment. The tax-equivalent adjustment
increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by
an amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax
basis, to the Corporations taxable income as previously
stated. The decrease in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly
related to decreases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt
assets, mainly due to a higher proportion of taxable assets to
total interest-earning assets resulting from the maintenance of
a higher liquidity position and lower yields on U.S. agency
and MBS held by the Corporations IBE subsidiary. The
Corporation replaced securities called and prepayments and sales
of MBS with shorter-term securities.
Provision
and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings
to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level
that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable
losses inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance
for loan and lease losses is also based upon a number of
additional
62
factors including trends in charge-offs and delinquencies,
current economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying
collateral and the financial condition of the borrowers, and, as
such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by
the Corporation. Although the Corporation believes that the
allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors beyond
the Corporations control, including factors affecting the
economies of Puerto Rico, the United States, the
U.S. Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands, may
contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating
additional reserves.
For the quarter ended on March 31, 2010, the Corporation
recorded a provision for loan and lease losses of
$171.0 million compared to $59.4 million for the
comparable period in 2009. The increase was mainly related to
increases to specific reserves on impaired loans as well as
increases in loss factors used to determine general reserves as
a result of increases in charge-offs and the sustained
deterioration of economic conditions. Higher than normalized
charge-offs was the trend during the last three quarters of 2009
and continued during the first quarter of 2010. Much of the
increase in the provision is related to the Corporations
construction and commercial mortgage loan portfolios in both the
Puerto Rico and Florida markets. Low absorption rates, higher
than normal loss rates and declines in collateral values
continue to adversely impact the performance of these
portfolios. However, regarding construction loans, the
Corporation has experienced an improvement in absorption rates
on its residential projects over the last two quarters that
going forward should contribute to slow down further significant
additions to the construction loans reserve.
In terms of geography, the Corporation recorded a provision of
$88.0 million in the first quarter of 2010 for its loan
portfolio in Puerto Rico compared to $38.3 million in the
comparable 2009 quarter, an increase of $49.7 million. The
increase is mainly related to the construction and commercial
mortgage loan portfolio. The provision for construction loans in
Puerto Rico increased by $31.1 million mainly due to
additions to specific reserves and adjustments to loss factors
used to determine general reserves driven by increases in
charge-offs and also affected by weak economic indicators. The
provision for commercial mortgage loans in Puerto Rico increased
by $14.0 million and the provision for residential mortgage
loans in Puerto Rico increased by $8.0 million, both
affected by negative trends in loss rates and falling property
values. The provision for consumer loans, including finance
leases, in Puerto Rico increased by $9.4 million mainly
related to reserve adjustments to account for weak economic
conditions in Puerto Rico reflected in higher unemployment rates
and declines in the gross national product. The aforementioned
increases in the provision were partially offset by a reduction
of $12.9 million in the provision for C&I loans mainly
due to certain loans individually evaluated during the first
quarter of 2010 that require lower reserves based on collateral
values.
With respect to the loan portfolio in the United States, the
Corporation recorded a $71.2 million provision for the
first quarter of 2010 compared to a $15.1 million provision
for the first quarter of 2009. The increase of
$56.1 million is also mainly related to the construction
and commercial mortgage loan portfolios affected by falling
property values and increases in charge-offs. The provision for
construction loans in the United States increased by
$32.6 million compared to the first quarter of 2009,
primarily due to increases to specific reserves of impaired
loans based on lower collateral values. As of March 31,
2010, approximately $254.2 million, or 92%, of the total
exposure to construction loans in Florida was individually
measured for impairment. The provision for commercial mortgage
loans in the United States increased by $19.6 million
compared to the first quarter of 2009 also adversely impacted by
lower collateral values. The Corporation continues to reduce its
credit exposure on this market through disposition of assets and
different loss mitigation initiatives as the end of this
difficult economic cycle is approaching. Over the last two
quarters, the Corporation has completed the sale of
approximately $71.8 million of impaired credits in Florida.
The provision recorded for the loan portfolio in the Virgin
Islands amounted to $11.8 million in the first quarter of
2010, an increase of $5.7 million compared to the same
period a year ago mainly associated with the construction loan
portfolio. Refer to the discussions under Credit Risk
Management below for an analysis of the allowance for loan
and lease losses, non-performing assets, impaired loans and
related information and refer to the discussions under
Financial Condition and Operating Analysis
Loan Portfolio and under Risk Management
Credit Risk Management below for additional information
concerning the Corporations loan portfolio exposure in the
geographic areas where the Corporation does business.
63
Non-Interest
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other service charges on loans
|
|
$
|
1,756
|
|
|
$
|
1,529
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
3,165
|
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Insurance income
|
|
|
2,275
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income before net gain on investments
|
|
|
14,562
|
|
|
|
12,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on VISA shares
|
|
|
10,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
20,696
|
|
|
|
17,838
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) on equity securities
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on investments
|
|
|
30,764
|
|
|
|
17,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,326
|
|
|
$
|
30,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income primarily consists of other service charges
on loans; service charges on deposit accounts; commissions
derived from various banking, securities and insurance
activities; gains and losses on mortgage banking activities; and
net gains and losses on investments and impairments.
Other service charges on loans consist mainly of service charges
on credit card-related activities and other non-deferrable fees
(e.g. agent, commitment, unused and drawing fees).
Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees and
other fees on deposit accounts.
Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales
and securitization of loans and revenues earned administering
residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and
subsequently sold with servicing retained. In addition,
lower-of-cost-or-market
valuation adjustments to the Corporations residential
mortgage loans held for sale portfolio and servicing rights, if
any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking activities.
Rental income represents income generated by the
Corporations subsidiary, First Leasing, on the rental of
various types of motor vehicles. As part of its strategies to
focus on its core business, the Corporation divested its
short-term auto rental business during the fourth quarter of
2009.
Insurance income consists of insurance commissions earned by the
Corporations subsidiary FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc.,
and the Banks subsidiary in the U.S. Virgin Islands,
FirstBank Insurance V.I., Inc. These subsidiaries offer a wide
variety of insurance business.
The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous
fees such as debit, credit card and point of sale (POS)
interchange fees and check and cash management fees and includes
commissions from the Corporations broker-dealer
subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities.
The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or
losses as a result of sales that are consistent with the
Corporations investment policies as well as OTTI charges
on the Corporations investment portfolio.
Non-interest income increased $15.3 million to
$45.3 million for the first quarter of 2010 from
$30.1 million for the first quarter of 2009. The increase
in non-interest income reflected:
|
|
|
|
|
A $10.7 million gain on the sale of the remaining VISA
Class C shares.
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $2.9 million in realized gains on the sale
of investment securities (mainly U.S. agency MBS). In an
effort to manage interest rate risk, and take advantage of
favorable market valuations, approximately $385 million of
30 year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS and
$65.1 million of GNMA pools that come from securitization
transactions was sold in the first quarter of 2010 resulting in
a gain of $20.7 million compared to a gain of
$17.7 million on the sale of approximately
$435 million of MBS in the first quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
|
A $1.7 million increase in gains from mortgage banking
activities due to higher servicing fees associated with a higher
servicing portfolio, lower temporary impairment charges against
the valuation allowance of servicing assets and higher
capitalization of servicing assets. Lower prepayments rates
positively impacted the value of servicing assets.
|
|
|
|
A $0.3 million increase in service charges on deposit
accounts, as the Corporation continues to focus on its core
business strategies that include the generation of additional
fee income in loans and deposits.
|
Non-Interest
Expenses
The following table presents the detail of non-interest expenses
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
31,728
|
|
|
$
|
34,242
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
14,774
|
|
Deposit insurance premium
|
|
|
16,653
|
|
|
|
4,880
|
|
Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees
|
|
|
5,686
|
|
|
|
5,793
|
|
Professional fees recurring
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
Professional fees non-recurring
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
Servicing and processing fees
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
Business promotion
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
Net loss on REO operations
|
|
|
3,693
|
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,137
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91,362
|
|
|
$
|
84,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses increased $6.8 million to
$91.4 million for the first quarter of 2010 from
$84.5 million for the first quarter of 2009. The increase
reflected:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $11.8 million in the FDIC deposit insurance
premium, as premium rates increased and the level of deposit
grew.
|
|
|
|
A $3.2 million increase in the reserve for probable losses
on outstanding unfunded loan commitments.
|
|
|
|
A $2.1 million increase in professional service fees as the
Corporation continued the implementation of key business
strategies and higher legal expenses in workout and foreclosure
procedures.
|
The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases
in expenses such as:
|
|
|
|
|
A $2.5 million decrease in employees compensation and
benefit expenses, mainly due to a lower headcount. The number of
full time equivalent employees decreased by 236, or 8%, since
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
A $1.7 million reduction in losses on REO operations due to
lower write-offs and losses on the sale of repossessed
properties.
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
A $0.9 million decrease in business promotion expenses due
to lower marketing activities.
|
|
|
|
The impact in 2009 of a $3.8 million impairment charge
associated with the core deposit intangible assets in its
Florida operations.
|
Management continues to focus on controlling expenses and
improving profitability.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
income taxes as well as applicable U.S. federal and state
taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on
its income from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First
BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation for U.S. income
tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income
tax only on its income from sources within the United States or
income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or
business within the United States. Any such tax paid is
creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against
the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability. The
Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on
its income from sources within that jurisdiction. Any such tax
paid is also creditable against the Corporations Puerto
Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and
limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended
(PR Code), First BanCorp is subject to a maximum
statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009, the Puerto Rico Government
approved Act No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate
Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico
Governments fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of
temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a
5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is
applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income
exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the
maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95% and an increase in
the capital gain statutory tax rate from 15% to 15.75%. This
temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced
after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
The PR Code also includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that
applies if the Corporations regular income tax liability
is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than
the maximum statutory rate mainly by investing in government
obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from
U.S. and Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business
through IBEs of the Corporation and the Bank and through the
Banks subsidiary FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in which
the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico
and U.S. income taxation. Under the Act, all IBEs are
subject to a special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise
subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure
is also effective for tax years that commence after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs
and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the
International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides
for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by
IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs that operate as a unit of a
bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the
IBEs net income exceeds 20% of the banks total net
taxable income.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Corporation
recognized an income tax expense of $6.9 million, compared
to an income tax benefit of $14.2 million recorded for the
same period in 2009. The variance in income tax expense mainly
resulted from non-cash charges of approximately
$40.9 million to increase the valuation allowance of the
Corporations deferred tax asset. Most of the increase is
related to deferred tax assets created in 2010 that were fully
reserved. Approximately $3.5 million of the increase to the
valuation allowance was related to deferred tax assets created
before 2010 and the remaining income tax expense is related to
the operations of profitable subsidiaries. As of March 31,
2010, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of
$232.6 million, amounted to $104.5 million compared to
$109.2 million as of December 31, 2009.
Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess
whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against their
deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not realization
standard. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary,
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant
66
weight is to be given to evidence that can be objectively
verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The
accounting for income taxes guidance requires the consideration
of all sources of taxable income available to realize the
deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing
temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies. In
estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and
risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking
into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance, and
recognizes tax benefits only when deemed probable.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a
significant negative factor that resulted in an increase in the
valuation allowance was that the Corporations banking
subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico, continues in a three-year
historical cumulative loss as of the end of the first quarter of
2010, mainly as a result of charges to the provision for loan
and lease losses, especially in the construction loan portfolio
in both the Puerto Rico and Florida markets, as a result of the
economic downturn. As of March 31, 2010, management
concluded that $104.5 million of the deferred tax assets
will be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realizing the
deferred tax assets, management has considered all four sources
of taxable income mentioned above and, even though the
Corporation expects to be profitable in the near future to
realize the deferred tax asset, given current uncertain economic
conditions, the Corporation has only relied on tax-planning
strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the
deferred tax asset amount. Among the most significant
tax-planning strategies identified are: (i) sale of
appreciated assets, (ii) consolidation of profitable and
unprofitable companies (in Puerto Rico each company files a
separate tax return; no consolidated tax returns are permitted),
and (iii) deferral of deductions without affecting its
utilization. Management will continue monitoring the likelihood
of realizing the deferred tax assets in future periods. If
future events differ from managements March 31, 2010
assessment, an additional valuation allowance may need to be
established, which may have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations results of operations. Similarly, to the
extent the realization of a portion, or all, of the tax asset
becomes more likely than not based on changes in
circumstances (such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws
or other relevant changes), a reversal of that portion of the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact
on the Corporations liquidity, nor does such an allowance
preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits or
other deferred tax assets in the future.
The income tax provision in 2010 and 2009 was also impacted by
adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result of the
aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates.
Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the
change in the income tax rate considering the enacted tax rate
expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which the
deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or
realized and an adjustment of $6.4 million was recorded for
the first quarter of 2010.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Assets
Total assets decreased to approximately $18.9 billion as of
March 31, 2010, down $777.5 million from approximately
$19.6 billion as of December 31, 2009. The decrease is
primarily related to a $736.7 million reduction in
investment securities and a net decrease of $702.9 million
in the loan portfolio, partially offset by an increase of
$626.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. The
Corporations decrease in investment securities is mainly
related to the sale of approximately $385 million in
U.S. agency MBS during the first quarter of 2010, the call
of approximately $275 million of U.S. agency debt
securities prior to their contractual maturity, and principal
repayments of MBS. The decrease is consistent with the
Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet to,
among other things and in line with market trends, further
strengthen its capital position. The decrease in the loan
portfolio was largely attributable to the repayment of a
$500 million facility extended to the Puerto Rico
government coupled with sales of impaired loans and a higher
allowance for loan and lease losses. The increase in cash and
cash equivalents, comparing end-of period balances, is mainly
related to increases in securities purchased under agreements to
resell and U.S. treasury bills money market investments. As
previously discussed, a key objective in 2010 was to strengthen
balance sheet liquidity due to potential
67
disruptions from the expected consolidation of the Puerto Rico
banking industry. Proceeds from sales and prepayments of MBS and
loans were used, in part, to increase liquidity. Subsequent to
the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking industry that took
place on April 30, 2010, no disruptions have been noted.
Refer to the Loan portfolio and Investment
Activities discussion below for additional information.
Loan
Portfolio
The following table presents the composition of the
Corporations loan portfolio, including loans held for
sale, as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans, including loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
3,598,569
|
|
|
$
|
3,616,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,547,707
|
|
|
|
1,590,821
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,457,027
|
|
|
|
1,492,589
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans(1)
|
|
|
4,523,178
|
|
|
|
5,029,907
|
|
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
314,628
|
|
|
|
321,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
|
|
7,842,540
|
|
|
|
8,434,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
309,275
|
|
|
|
318,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other loans
|
|
|
1,543,110
|
|
|
|
1,579,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,293,494
|
|
|
$
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, includes $1.2 billion of
commercial loans that are secured by real estate but are not
dependent upon the real estate for repayment. |
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations total loans
decreased by $655.7 million, when compared with the balance
as of December 31, 2009. All major loan categories
decreased from 2009 levels, driven by the aforementioned
repayment of a $500 million credit facility extended to the
Puerto Rico government as well as charge-offs, pay-downs and
sales of loans.
Of the total gross loan portfolio of $13.3 billion as of
March 31, 2010, approximately 83% have credit risk
concentration in Puerto Rico, 9% in the United States (mainly in
the state of Florida) and 8% in the Virgin Islands, as shown in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
Virgin Islands
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
2,791,978
|
|
|
$
|
446,194
|
|
|
$
|
360,397
|
|
|
$
|
3,598,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans(1)
|
|
|
981,598
|
|
|
|
197,781
|
|
|
|
277,648
|
|
|
|
1,457,027
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
982,321
|
|
|
|
72,245
|
|
|
|
493,141
|
|
|
|
1,547,707
|
|
Commercial and Industrial loans
|
|
|
4,221,836
|
|
|
|
270,670
|
|
|
|
30,672
|
|
|
|
4,523,178
|
|
Loans to a local financial institution collateralized by real
estate mortgages
|
|
|
314,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
6,500,383
|
|
|
|
540,696
|
|
|
|
801,461
|
|
|
|
7,842,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
309,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,420,279
|
|
|
|
89,784
|
|
|
|
33,047
|
|
|
|
1,543,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
11,021,915
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,674
|
|
|
$
|
1,194,905
|
|
|
$
|
13,293,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Construction loans of Florida operations include approximately
$70.1 million of condo-conversion loans. |
Loan
Production
First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches
to originate residential and consumer loans. The Corporation
supplements its residential mortgage originations with wholesale
servicing released mortgage loan purchases from mortgage
bankers. The Corporation manages its construction and commercial
loan originations through centralized units and most of its
originations come from existing customers as well as through
referrals and direct solicitations. For commercial loan
originations, the Corporation also has regional offices to
provide services to designated territories.
The following table details First BanCorps loan
production, including purchases and refinancing, for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
126,672
|
|
|
$
|
142,856
|
|
C&I and commercial mortgage
|
|
|
304,935
|
|
|
|
882,892
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
50,853
|
|
|
|
97,126
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
23,050
|
|
|
|
19,594
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
131,483
|
|
|
|
124,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan production
|
|
$
|
636,993
|
|
|
$
|
1,266,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in loan production for the first quarter of 2010,
as compared to the same period in 2009, was mainly associated
with the reduction in credit facilities extended to the Puerto
Rico Government. During the first quarter of 2010, credit
facilities to the Puerto Rico government amounted to
$42.1 million compared to $502.2 million for the
comparable period in 2009. Originations in 2009 included a
$500 million facility extended to the Puerto Rico Sales Tax
Financing Corp. (COFINA under its Spanish acronym), an
instrumentality of the Government of Puerto Rico that has
already been repaid and a $115 million refinancing of a
commercial relationship in the health industry. Other decreases
were observed in construction loan originations due to the
Corporations strategic decision to reduce its exposure to
construction projects in both Puerto Rico and the United States
markets. Despite the present economic climate, the Corporation
continued with stable residential mortgage loan originations and
increased its consumer originations, mainly auto financings,
which is a positive indicator of a potential recovery of the
Puerto Rico economy.
Residential
Real Estate Loans
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations residential
real estate loan portfolio decreased by $17.7 million as
compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009. More than
90% of the Corporations outstanding balance of residential
mortgage loans consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full
documentation loans. In accordance with the Corporations
underwriting guidelines, residential real estate loans are
mostly fully documented loans, and the Corporation is not
actively involved in the origination of negative amortization
loans or adjustable-rate mortgage loans. The decrease was a
combination of loan sales and securitizations that in aggregate
amounted to $77.3 million, charge-offs of
$13.3 million and pay downs and foreclosures. Residential
loan originations were stable compared to 2009 activity and the
reduction, as compared to the first quarter of 2009, is mainly
related to a decrease in the amount of loan purchases. Refer to
the Contractual Obligations and Commitments
discussion below for additional information about outstanding
commitments to sell mortgage loans.
Commercial
and Construction Loans
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations commercial and
construction loan portfolio decreased by $592.3 million, as
compared to the balance as of December 31, 2009, due mainly
to the $500 million
69
repayment from COFINA combined with net charge-offs of
$96.3 million, the sale of approximately $31.4 million
associated with two impaired commercial mortgage loans in
Florida and pay downs. The Corporations commercial loans
are primarily variable- and adjustable-rate loans.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had
$677.1 million outstanding of credit facilities granted to
the Puerto Rico government
and/or its
political subdivisions and $165.5 million granted to the
Virgin Islands government. A substantial portion of these credit
facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment, such as property
taxes collected by the central Government
and/or
municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of
loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates
charged for services or products, such as electric power and
water utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the
good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality have been pledged to their repayment.
Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
government, the largest loan to one borrower as of
March 31, 2010 in the amount of $314.6 million is with
one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial
Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate.
The Corporations construction lending volume has been
stagnant for the last two years due to the slowdown in the
U.S. housing market and the current economic environment in
Puerto Rico. The Corporation has reduced its exposure to
condo-conversion loans in its Florida operations and its
construction loan originations in Puerto Rico are mainly draws
from existing commitments. Approximately 97% of the construction
loan originations in 2010 are related to disbursements from
previous established commitments and new loans are exclusively
associated with construction loans to individuals. Current
absorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the United States
are low and properties collateralizing some of these
condo-conversion loans have been formally reverted to rental
properties with a future plan for the sale of converted units
upon an improvement in the real estate market. As of
March 31, 2010, approximately $28.6 million of loans
outstanding originally disbursed as condo-conversion
construction loans have been formally reverted to
income-producing commercial loans, while the repayment of
interest on the remaining $70 million construction
condo-conversion loans is coming principally from rental income
and other sources. In Puerto Rico, absorption rates on
residential projects financed by the Corporation increased over
the last two quarters but the market is still under pressure
because of an oversupply of housing units compounded by a lower
demand and diminished consumer purchasing power and confidence.
The unemployment rate in Puerto Rico tops 16%.
The construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico decreased by
$16.6 million during the first quarter of 2010 driven by
charge-offs of $33.7 million. In Florida the construction
portfolio decreased by $21.9 million, also driven by
charge-offs of $19.5 million recorded during the first
quarter of 2010.
70
The composition of the Corporations construction loan
portfolio as of March 31, 2010 by category and geographic
location follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto
|
|
|
Virgin
|
|
|
United
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
Rico
|
|
|
Islands
|
|
|
States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Loans for residential housing projects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-rise(1)
|
|
$
|
190,376
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
190,935
|
|
Mid-rise(2)
|
|
|
89,236
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
19,593
|
|
|
|
113,510
|
|
Single-family detached
|
|
|
117,197
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
28,167
|
|
|
|
148,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for residential housing projects
|
|
|
396,809
|
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
|
|
48,319
|
|
|
|
453,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential
properties
|
|
|
12,137
|
|
|
|
24,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,589
|
|
Condo-conversion loans
|
|
|
11,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,092
|
|
|
|
81,601
|
|
Loans for commercial projects
|
|
|
342,550
|
|
|
|
118,363
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
462,459
|
|
Bridge loans residential
|
|
|
56,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
57,860
|
|
Bridge loans commercial
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
25,374
|
|
|
|
69,913
|
|
|
|
98,290
|
|
Land loans residential
|
|
|
76,490
|
|
|
|
20,265
|
|
|
|
60,289
|
|
|
|
157,044
|
|
Land loans commercial
|
|
|
60,219
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
26,271
|
|
|
|
87,616
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
25,847
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
985,139
|
|
|
|
198,534
|
|
|
|
277,715
|
|
|
|
1,461,388
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(3,541
|
)
|
|
|
(753
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(4,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, gross
|
|
|
981,598
|
|
|
|
197,781
|
|
|
|
277,648
|
|
|
|
1,457,027
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(119,137
|
)
|
|
|
(25,755
|
)
|
|
|
(65,321
|
)
|
|
|
(210,213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, net
|
|
$
|
862,461
|
|
|
$
|
172,026
|
|
|
$
|
212,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,246,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of the above table, high-rise portfolio is composed
of buildings with more than 7 stories, mainly composed of three
projects that represent approximately 87% of the
Corporations total outstanding high-rise residential
construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Mid-rise relates to buildings having up to 7 stories. |
The following table presents further information on the
Corporations construction portfolio as of and for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments
|
|
$
|
220,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans in non-accrual status
|
|
$
|
685,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge offs Construction loans(1)
|
|
$
|
53,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses Construction loans
|
|
$
|
210,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans
|
|
|
47.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses construction loans to
total construction loans
|
|
|
14.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (annualized) to total average construction loans
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes charge-offs of $33.7 million related to
construction loans in Puerto Rico and $19.5 million related
to construction loans in Florida. |
71
The following summarizes the construction loans for residential
housing projects in Puerto Rico segregated by the estimated
selling price of the units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Under $300K
|
|
$
|
95,134
|
|
$300K-$600K
|
|
|
185,034
|
|
Over $600K(1)
|
|
|
116,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
396,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly composed of two high-rise projects and two single-family
detached projects that accounts for approximately 47% and 33%,
respectively, of the residential housing projects in Puerto Rico
with selling prices over $600k. |
For the majority of the construction loans for residential
housing projects in Florida, the estimated selling price of the
units is under $300,000.
Consumer
Loans and Finance Leases
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporations consumer loan
and finance leases portfolio decreased by $45.7 million, as
compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2009.
This is mainly the result of repayments and charge-offs that on
a combined basis more than offset the volume of loan
originations during the first quarter of 2010. Nevertheless, the
Corporation experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for
consumer loans and finance leases that amounted to
$14.1 million for the first quarter of 2010, as compared to
$14.8 million for the same period a year ago.
Consumer loan originations are principally driven through the
Corporations retail network. For the first quarter of
2010, consumer loan originations increased by $10.5 million
compared to the same periods in 2009, mainly in auto financings.
Investment
Activities
As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and
maximize its net interest income, First BanCorp maintains an
investment portfolio that is classified as
available-for-sale
or
held-to-maturity.
The Corporations
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
portfolio as of March 31, 2010 amounted to
$4.0 billion, a reduction of $736.5 million when
compared to $4.8 billion as of December 31, 2009. The
reduction was the net result of approximately $450 million
of MBS sold during the quarter (mainly U.S. agency MBS)
with a weighted average yield of 5.19%, the call of
approximately $275 million of U.S. agency debt
securities with a weighted average yield of 2.24% and MBS
prepayments, partially offset by the securitization of
approximately $57 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into
GNMA MBS and the purchase of approximately $100 million in
aggregate of
2-year
U.S. Treasury Notes with a yield of 1.02% and
3-year
U.S. agency debt securities with a yield of 2.00%.
Over 90% of the Corporations
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolio is invested in U.S. Government and
Agency debentures and fixed-rate U.S. government
sponsored-agency MBS (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate
securities). The Corporations investment in equity
securities is minimal, approximately $0.2 million, which
consists of common stock of a financial institution in Puerto
Rico.
72
The following table presents the carrying value of investments
at the indicated dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Money market investments
|
|
$
|
654,648
|
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
8,480
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
23,750
|
|
|
|
23,579
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
530,691
|
|
|
|
567,560
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
601,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations
|
|
|
966,550
|
|
|
|
1,145,139
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
136,371
|
|
|
|
136,326
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,367,884
|
|
|
|
2,889,014
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
4,170,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities, including $68.4 million of FHLB
stock as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
69,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
4,760,247
|
|
|
$
|
4,866,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities at the indicated dates consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
$
|
4,298
|
|
|
$
|
5,015
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
526,393
|
|
|
|
562,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530,691
|
|
|
|
567,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
|
338,230
|
|
|
|
722,249
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
397,275
|
|
|
|
418,312
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
1,415,661
|
|
|
|
1,507,792
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by
FHLMC, FNMA and GNMA
|
|
|
135,835
|
|
|
|
156,307
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through certificates
|
|
|
80,883
|
|
|
|
84,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,367,884
|
|
|
|
2,889,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
2,898,575
|
|
|
$
|
3,456,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
The carrying values of investment securities classified as
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
as of March 31, 2010 by contractual maturity (excluding
mortgage-backed securities and equity securities) are shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Yield%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
916,653
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
49,897
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975,040
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
11,930
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
113,497
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
26,068
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
8,626
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,121
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,137,161
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,898,575
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale and held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
4,035,919
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income of future periods will be affected by the
Corporations decision to deleverage its investment
securities portfolio to fortify its capital position and
maintain a higher liquidity in overnight funds, reverse
repurchase agreements and U.S. Treasury bills with
maturities of less than three 3 months due to potential
disruptions from the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking
industry. Subsequent to the consolidation of the Puerto Rico
banking industry that took place on April 30, 2010, no
disruptions have been noted. Also, net interest income may be
affected by prepayments of mortgage-backed securities.
Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities
would lower yields on these securities, as the amortization of
premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would
accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of
mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities
purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount
would accelerate. Also, net interest income in future periods
might be affected by the Corporations investment in
callable securities. Approximately $275 million of
U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 2.24% were
called during the first quarter of 2010. As of March 31,
2010, the Corporation has approximately $915 million in
U.S. agency debentures with embedded calls and with an
average yield of 2.09% (mainly securities with contractual
maturities of 2 to 3 years acquired in 2009), of which
$500 million were called after the end of the first quarter
of 2010. However, the Corporation has been using proceeds from
called securities and deploy some of its liquidity in the second
quarter of 2010 through the purchase of approximately
$1.8 billion of investment securities (approximately
$800 million in 2,3,5 and 7 year U.S Treasury Notes
with an average yield of 1.88%; approximately $496 million
in 2,3 and 5 year U.S agency debt securities with an
average yield of 1.52% and approximately $524 million in 30
and 15 year GNMA pools with an average yield of 3.85%).
These risks are directly linked to future period market interest
rate fluctuations. Refer to the Risk Management
section below for further analysis of the effects of changing
interest rates on the Corporations net interest income and
of the interest rate risk management strategies followed by the
Corporation. Also refer to Note 4 to the accompanying
un-audited consolidated financial statements for additional
information regarding the Corporations investment
portfolio.
74
RISK
MANAGEMENT
Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the
Corporations business activities and operations.
Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the
success of the Corporation. The primary goals of risk management
are to ensure that the Corporations risk taking activities
are consistent with the Corporations objectives and risk
tolerance and that there is an appropriate balance between risk
and reward in order to maximize stockholder value.
The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to
monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks assumed in
conducting its activities. First BanCorps business is
subject to eight broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity
risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) market risk,
(4) credit risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal
and compliance risk, (7) reputational risk, and
(8) contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies
and procedures designed to identify and manage risks to which
the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to
liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, and operational
risk.
The Corporations risk management policies are described
below as well as in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
section of First BanCorps 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Liquidity
and Capital Adequacy
Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability
maturities and deposit withdrawals, fund asset growth and
business operations, and meet contractual obligations through
unconstrained access to funding at reasonable market rates.
Liquidity management involves forecasting funding requirements
and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs for
liquidity and accommodate fluctuations in asset and liability
levels due to changes in the Corporations business
operations or unanticipated events.
The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is
the liquidity of the parent company, which is the holding
company that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The
second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiary. The Asset and
Liability Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
establishing the Corporations liquidity policy as well as
approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring
liquidity on an ongoing basis. The Managements Investment
and Asset Liability Committee (MIALCO), using
measures of liquidity developed by management, which involve the
use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporations
liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees
liquidity management, interest rate risk and other related
matters. The MIALCO, which reports to the Board of
Directors Asset and Liability Committee, is composed of
senior management officers, including the Chief Executive
Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Risk Officer,
the Wholesale Banking Executive, the Retail Financial Services
Director, the Risk Manager of the Treasury and Investments
Division, the Asset/Liability Manager and the Treasurer. The
Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning
and executing the Corporations funding activities and
strategy, monitoring liquidity availability on a daily basis and
reviewing liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and
Investments Accounting and Operations area of the
Comptrollers Department is responsible for calculating the
liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment
Division to review the Corporations liquidity position.
In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of
potential operating environments and market conditions, the
Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business
activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding
stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this
operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued
development of customer-based funding, the maintenance of direct
relationships with wholesale market funding providers, and the
maintenance of the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and
if, requirements warrant.
The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding
plans. These plans evaluate the Corporations liquidity
position under various operating circumstances and allow the
Corporation to ensure that it will be able to operate through
periods of stress when access to normal sources of funding is
constrained. The plans project funding requirements during a
potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of
liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively
managing through a difficult period, and define roles and
75
responsibilities. In the Contingency Funding Plan, the
Corporation stresses the balance sheet and the liquidity
position to critical levels that imply difficulties in getting
new funds or even maintaining its current funding position,
thereby ensuring the ability to honor its commitments, and
establishing liquidity triggers monitored by the MIALCO in order
to maintain the ordinary funding of the banking business. Three
different scenarios are defined in the Contingency Funding Plan:
local market event, credit rating downgrade, and a concentration
event. They are reviewed and approved annually by the Board of
Directors Asset and Liability Committee.
The Corporation manages its liquidity in a proactive manner, and
maintains an adequate position. Multiple measures are utilized
to monitor the Corporations liquidity position, including
basic surplus and time-based liquidity gap reserve measure. The
Corporation has maintained the basic surplus (cash, short-term
assets minus short-term liabilities, and secured lines of
credit) well in excess of the self-imposed minimum limit of 5%
of total assets. As of March 31, 2010, the estimated basic
surplus ratio of approximately 12% included un-pledged
investment securities, FHLB lines of credit, and cash. At the
end of the quarter, the Corporation had $464 million
available of unused secured credit to borrow from the FHLB.
Un-pledged liquid securities as of March 31, 2010 mainly
consisted of fixed-rate U.S. agency debentures and MBS
totaling approximately $818.3 million. The Corporation does
not rely on uncommitted inter-bank lines of credit (federal
funds lines) to fund its operations and does not include them in
the basic surplus computation. As previously discussed, the
Corporation decided to further increase its liquidity levels in
the first quarter of 2010 due to potential disruptions from the
consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking industry and volumes
are significantly higher than normalized levels as reflected in
the period-end cash and cash equivalents balance of
$1.3 billion, an increase of $626 million since
December 2009 and well in excess of historical average balances
of approximately $450 million over the last three years.
Subsequent to the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking
industry that took place on April 30, 2010, no disruptions
have been noted.
Sources
of Funding
The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help
ensure that adequate levels of liquidity are available when
needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great
importance to protect the Corporations liquidity from
market disruptions. The principal sources of short-term funds
are deposits, including brokered CDs, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB and
the FED. The Asset Liability Committee of the Board of Directors
reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The Corporation
has also securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary
source of funding. Commercial paper has also in the past
provided additional funding. Long-term funding has also been
obtained through the issuance of notes and, to a lesser extent,
long-term brokered CDs. The cost of these different
alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration.
The Corporation is in the process of deleveraging its balance
sheet by reducing the amounts of brokered CDs and borrowings
from the FED. Such reductions are being partly offset by
increases in retail and business deposits. At least
$500 million of brokered CDs outstanding at the beginning
of the year will not be renewed. The $600 million in
advances from the FED outstanding as of March 31, 2010, are
expected to be re-paid on or before June 30, 2010. At the
same time as the Corporation focuses on reducing its reliance on
brokered deposits, it is seeking to add core deposits and
pursuing other growth opportunities. Refer to
Capital discussion below for additional information
about capital raising efforts that would impact capital and
liquidity levels.
The Corporations principal sources of funding are:
Brokered CDs A large portion of the
Corporations funding has been retail brokered CDs issued
by the Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered
CDs decreased from $7.6 billion at year-end 2009 to
$7.4 billion as of March 31, 2010. The Corporation
decided to deleverage its balance sheet in 2010 to fortify its
capital position and has been using proceeds from repayments and
sales of loans and investments to pay down maturing borrowings,
including brokered CDs. Also, the Corporation is successfully
implementing its core deposit growth strategy that has resulted
in an increase of $418.3 million, or 8%, in non-brokered
deposits during the first quarter of 2010.
76
In the event that the Corporations Bank subsidiary falls
below the ratios of a well-capitalized institution, it faces the
risk of not being able to obtain funding through this source.
The FDIC and bank regulators may also exercise regulatory
discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of brokered
deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as to an
over-reliance on such funding. The Bank currently complies and
exceeds the minimum requirements of ratios for a
well-capitalized institution (refer to
Capital discussion below for additional
information). As of March 31, 2010, the Banks total
and Tier 1 capital exceed by $370 million and
$734 million, respectively, the minimum well-capitalized
levels. The average remaining term to maturity of the retail
brokered CDs outstanding as of March 31, 2009 is
approximately 1.2 years. Approximately 3% of the principal
value of these certificates are callable at the
Corporations option.
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the
growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense
competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits
in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and
liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial
amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy
enhances the Corporations liquidity position, since the
brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and
can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits. The
brokered CDs market continues to be a reliable source to fulfill
the Corporations needs. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, the Corporation issued $1.46 billion
in brokered CDs to renew maturing broker CDs having an average
interest rate of 1.38%.
The following table presents a maturity summary of brokered and
retail CDs with denominations of $100,000 or higher as of
March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
1,516,737
|
|
Over three months to six months
|
|
|
1,203,764
|
|
Over six months to one year
|
|
|
1,953,583
|
|
Over one year
|
|
|
3,736,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,410,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or higher
include brokered CDs of $7.4 billion issued to deposit
brokers in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of
deposit that are generally participated out by brokers in shares
of less than $100,000 and are therefore insured by the FDIC.
Certificates of deposit also include $22.7 million of
deposits through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry
Service (CDARS). In an effort to meet customer needs and provide
its customers with the best products and services available, the
Corporations bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico, has
joined a program that gives depositors the opportunity to insure
their money beyond the standard FDIC coverage. CDARS can offer
customers access to FDIC insurance coverage beyond the $250
thousand per account without limit by placing deposit in
multiple banks through a single bank gateway, when they enter
into the CDARS Deposit Placement Agreement, while earning
attractive returns on their deposits.
Retail deposits The Corporations
deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand
deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. Total
deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased by
$418.3 million to $5.5 billion from the balance of
$5.1 billion as of December 31, 2009, reflecting
increases in core-deposit products such as money market, savings
and interest-bearing checking accounts. A significant portion of
the increase was related to increases in money market accounts
and retail CDs in Florida. Successful marketing campaigns and
attractive rates were the main reason for the increase in
Florida. Increases were also reflected in Puerto Rico, the
Corporations principal market, with an increase of
$56.8 million and in the Virgin Islands with an increase of
$24.2 million. Refer to Note 11 in the accompanying
unaudited financial statements for further details.
Refer to the Net Interest Income discussion above
for information about average balances of interest-bearing
deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
77
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
The Corporations investment portfolio is substantially
funded with repurchase agreements. Securities sold under
repurchase agreements were $2.5 billion at March 31,
2010, compared with $3.1 billion at December 31, 2009.
The decrease relates to the Corporations decision to
deleverage its balance sheet by paying down maturing short-term
repurchase agreements. One of the Corporations strategies
is the use of structured repurchase agreements and long-term
repurchase agreements to reduce exposure to interest rate risk
by lengthening the final maturities of its liabilities while
keeping funding costs at reasonable levels. Of the total of
$2.5 billion repurchase agreements outstanding as of
March 31, 2010, approximately $2.0 billion consist of
structured repos and $500 million of long-term repos.
The access to this type of funding was affected by the liquidity
turmoil in the financial markets witnessed in the second half of
2008 and in 2009. Certain counterparties are still not willing
to extend the term of maturing repurchase agreements.
Notwithstanding, in addition to short-term repos, the
Corporation has been able to maintain access to credit by using
cost-effective sources such as FED and FHLB advances. Refer to
Note 13 in the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements for further details about
repurchase agreements outstanding by counterparty and maturities.
Under the Corporations repurchase agreements, as is the
case with derivative contracts, the Corporation is required to
deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin
requirements. To the extent that the value of securities
previously pledged as collateral declines because of changes in
interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the
Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or
securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely
affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral
pledged, the Corporation has not experienced significant margin
calls from counterparties arising from credit-quality-related
write-downs in valuations with only $0.7 million of cash
deposited in connection with collateralized interest rate swap
agreements.
Advances from the FHLB The Corporations
Bank subsidiary is a member of the FHLB system and obtains
advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement
with the FHLB that requires the Bank to maintain minimum
qualifying mortgages as collateral for advances taken. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the outstanding
balance of FHLB advances was $960.4 million and
$978.4 million, respectively. Approximately
$540.4 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB has
maturities over one year. As part of its precautionary
initiatives to safeguard access to credit and the low level of
interest rates, the Corporation has been pledging assets with
the FHLB, including $25 million of cash collateral, while
at the same time the FHLB has been revising their credit
guidelines and haircuts in the computation of
availability of credit lines.
FED Discount window FED initiatives to ease
the credit crisis have included cuts to the discount rate, which
was lowered from 4.75% to 0.50% through eight separate actions
since December 2007, and adjustments to previous practices to
facilitate financing for longer periods. That made the FED
Discount Window a viable source of funding given market
conditions in 2009. As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation
had $600 million outstanding in short-term borrowings from
the FED Discount Window with a rate of 1.25% and had collateral
pledged related to this credit facility amounting to
$1.3 billion, mainly commercial, consumer and mortgage
loans. There is currently $900 million cap in place related
to advances from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With
U.S. market conditions improving, the Federal Reserve
announced in early 2010 its intention to withdraw part of the
economic stimulus measures, including reinstating restrictions
in the use of Discount Window borrowings, thereby returning to
its function as lender of last resort. The Corporation expects
to repay the $600 million outstanding on or before
June 30, 2010.
Credit Lines The Corporation maintains
unsecured and un-committed lines of credit with other banks. As
of March 31, 2010, the Corporations total unused
lines of credit with other banks amounted to $165 million.
The Corporation has not used these lines of credit to fund its
operations.
Though currently not in use, other sources of short-term funding
for the Corporation include commercial paper and federal funds
purchased. Furthermore, in previous years the Corporation has
entered into several financing transactions to diversify its
funding sources, including the issuance of notes payable and
Junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term
liquidity and capital management activities. No assurance can be
given that these sources of liquidity will be available and if
available will be on comparable terms. The
78
Corporation continues to evaluate its financing options,
including available options resulting from recent federal
government initiatives to deal with the crisis in the financial
markets.
The Corporations principal uses of funds are the
origination of loans and the repayment of maturing deposits and
borrowings. The Corporation has committed substantial resources
to its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc. As a
result, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total
loans receivable have increased over time from 14% at
December 31, 2004 to 27% at March 31, 2010.
Commensurate with the increase in its mortgage banking
activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and
personnel to enhance the Corporations secondary mortgage
market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve the
Corporations liquidity profile as they allow the
Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed, from the sale of
mortgage loans in the secondary market. The U.S. (including
Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still highly liquid in
large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA,
VA, HUD, FNMA and FHLMC. The Corporation obtained Commitment
Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities from GNMA
and, under this program, the Corporation completed the
securitization of approximately $57 million of FHA/VA
mortgage loans into GNMA MBS during 2010. Any regulatory actions
affecting GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC could adversely affect the
secondary mortgage market.
Credit
Ratings
The Corporations credit as long-term issuer is currently
rated B by Standard & Poors
(S&P) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited
(Fitch), both with negative outlook.
At the FirstBank subsidiary level, long-term senior debt is
currently rated B1 by Moodys Investor Service
(Moodys), four notches below their definition of
investment grade; B by S&P, and B by Fitch, both five
notches below their definition of investment grade. The outlook
on the Banks credit ratings from the three rating agencies
is negative.
In the fourth quarter 2009, the Corporation and its subsidiary
bank suffered credit rating downgrades from Moodys (Ba2 to
B1), S&P (BB+ to B), and Fitch (BB to B) rating
services. Furthermore, on April 27, 2010, S&P placed
the Corporation on Credit Watch Negative. The
Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative
agreements that would be affected by the recent or any future
credit downgrades. Given our current non-reliance on corporate
debt or other instruments directly linked in terms of pricing or
volume to credit ratings, the liquidity of the Corporation so
far has also not been affected in any material way by the
downgrades.
The Corporations liquidity, however, is contingent upon
its ability to obtain new external sources of funding to finance
its operations. The Corporations current credit ratings
and any further downgrades in credit ratings can hinder the
Corporations access to external funding
and/or cause
external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn
adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any change in
credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities
and unsecured derivatives that consider the Corporations
own credit risk as part of the valuation.
Cash
Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were $1.3 billion and
$132.1 million at March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. These balances increased by $626.1 million
and decreased by $273.6 million from December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The following discussion highlights the
major activities and transactions that affected the
Corporations cash flows during the first quarter of 2010
and 2009.
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
First BanCorps operating assets and liabilities vary
significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount
and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from
operations, available cash balances and the Corporations
ability to generate cash through short- and long-term borrowings
will be sufficient to fund the Corporations operating
liquidity needs.
79
For the first quarter of 2010, net cash provided by operating
activities was $83.3 million. Net cash generated from
operating activities was higher than net loss reported largely
as a result of adjustments for operating items such as the
provision for loan and lease losses, partially offset by
adjustments to net income from gain on sale of investments.
For the first quarter of 2009, net cash provided by operating
activities was $74.3 million, which was higher than net
income, mainly also as a result of adjustments for operating
items such as the provision for loan and lease losses.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
The Corporations investing activities primarily include
originating loans to be held to maturity and its
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
investment portfolios. For the quarter ended March 31,
2010, net cash provided by investing activities was
$1.2 billion, primarily reflecting proceeds from loans, as
well as proceeds from securities sold or called during the first
quarter of 2010 and MBS prepayments.
For the first quarter of 2009, net cash used in investing
activities was $466.8 million, primarily for loan
origination disbursements and purchases of
available-for-sale
investment securities to mitigate in part the impact of
investment securities called by counterparties prior to maturity
and MBS prepayments.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
The Corporations financing activities primarily include
the receipt of deposits and issuance of brokered CDs, the
issuance and payments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity
instruments and activities related to its short-term funding. In
addition, the Corporation paid monthly dividends on its
preferred stock and quarterly dividends on its common stock
until it announced the suspension of dividends beginning in
August 2009. In the first quarter of 2010, net cash used in
financing activities was $691.3 million due to the
Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet and
pay down maturing repurchase agreements as well as advances from
the FHLB and the FED. Partially offsetting these cash reductions
was the growth of the core deposit base
In the first quarter of 2009, net cash provided by financing
activities was $119.0 million due to the investment of
$400 million by the U.S. Treasury in preferred stock
of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital
Purchase Program and due to the use of the FED Discount Window
Program and advances from the FHLB to refinance brokered CDs at
a lower cost and finance the Corporations lending
activities. Partially offsetting these cash proceeds was the
payment of cash dividends and pay down of maturing borrowings,
in particular brokered CDs and repurchase agreements.
Capital
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to
$1.5 billion as of March 31, 2010, a decrease of
$110.5 million compared to the balance as of
December 31, 2009, driven by the net loss of
$107.0 million for the first quarter, as well as a decrease
in accumulated other comprehensive income of $3.5 million
related to the aforementioned sale of investments and changes in
the fair value of investment securities. As previously reported,
the Corporation decided to suspend the payment of common and
preferred dividends, effective with the preferred dividend for
the month of August 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, First BanCorp and FirstBank Puerto
Rico were in compliance with regulatory capital requirements
that were applicable to them as a financial holding company and
a state non-member bank, respectively (i.e., total capital and
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and
4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of
at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorps, and
FirstBank Puerto Ricos regulatory capital ratios as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, based on
existing Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation guidelines.
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Subsidiary
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
To be well
|
|
|
BanCorp
|
|
FirstBank
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.26
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
11.98
|
%
|
|
|
11.48
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
8.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
12.87
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
|
11.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
The decrease in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to
the net loss reported for the quarter that was almost entirely
offset by the decrease in risk-weighted assets consistent with
the Corporations decision to deleverage its balance sheet
to fortify its capital position.
The Corporation continued to be well-capitalized, based on it
having approximately $437 million and $800 million of
total capital and Tier 1 capital as of March 31, 2010,
respectively, in excess of minimum well-capitalized requirements
of 10% and 6%, respectively.
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio was 2.74% as
of March 31, 2010, compared to 3.20% as of
December 31, 2009, and the Tier 1 common equity to
risk- weighted assets ratio as of March 31, 2010 was 3.36%
compared to 4.10% as of December 31, 2009.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share are non-GAAP measures generally used by financial
analysts and investment bankers to evaluate capital adequacy.
Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity,
goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Tangible assets are total
assets less goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Management
and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and
tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more
traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy
of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or
other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the
purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets
or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any
other measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the
manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common
equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may
differ from that of other companies reporting measures with
similar names.
The following table is a reconciliation of the
Corporations tangible common equity and tangible assets
for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Tangible Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity GAAP
|
|
$
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
Preferred equity
|
|
|
(929,660
|
)
|
|
|
(928,508
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(15,934
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity
|
|
$
|
514,851
|
|
|
$
|
625,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Tangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets GAAP
|
|
$
|
18,850,694
|
|
|
$
|
19,628,448
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(15,934
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
18,806,662
|
|
|
$
|
19,583,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is
calculated by dividing (a) Tier 1 capital less
non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred
stock and qualifying trust preferred securities, by
(b) risk-weighted assets, which assets are calculated in
accordance with applicable bank regulatory requirements. The
Tier 1 common equity ratio is not required by GAAP or on a
recurring basis by applicable bank regulatory requirements.
However, this ratio was used by the Federal Reserve in
connection with its stress test administered to the 19 largest
U.S. bank holding companies under the Supervisory Capital
Assessment Program (SCAP), the results of which were announced
on May 7, 2009. Management is currently monitoring this
ratio, along with the other ratios discussed above, in
evaluating the Corporations capital levels and believes
that, at this time, the ratio may continue to be of interest to
investors.
The following table reconciles stockholders equity (GAAP)
to Tier 1 common equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Tier 1 Common Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity GAAP
|
|
$
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,599,063
|
|
Qualifying preferred stock
|
|
|
(929,660
|
)
|
|
|
(928,508
|
)
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on
available-for-sale
securities(1)
|
|
|
(22,948
|
)
|
|
|
(26,617
|
)
|
Disallowed deferred tax asset(2)
|
|
|
(40,522
|
)
|
|
|
(11,827
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
|
|
(28,098
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
(15,934
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600
|
)
|
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities accounted
for under a fair value option
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
Other disallowed assets
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity
|
|
$
|
450,406
|
|
|
$
|
585,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
13,402,979
|
|
|
$
|
14,303,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
debt securities and net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in
accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In
arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to
deduct net unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of
tax. |
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $69 million of the Corporations
deferred tax assets at March 31, 2010 (December 31,
2009 $111 million; March 31,
2009 $59 million) was included without
limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based
capital guidelines, while approximately $41 million of such
assets at |
82
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (December 31, 2009
$12 million; March 31, 2009
$83 million) exceeded the limitation imposed by these
guidelines and, as disallowed deferred tax assets,
was deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. According to
regulatory capital guidelines, the deferred tax assets that are
dependent upon future taxable income are limited for inclusion
in Tier 1 capital to the lesser of: (i) the amount of
such deferred tax asset that the entity expects to realize
within one year of the calendar quarter end-date, based on its
projected future taxable income for that year or (ii) 10%
of the amount of the entitys Tier 1 capital.
Approximately $5 million of the Corporations other
net deferred tax liability at March 31, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $4 million;
March 31, 2009 $1 million) represented
primarily the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and
losses on
available-for-sale
debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to
deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to
limitation under the guidelines. |
During the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation announced its
plan to enhance its capital structure. The Corporation retained
Sandler ONeill + Partners and UBS Securities, Inc. to find
purchasers for approximately $500 million of common stock.
The Corporation also announced that it is considering a rights
offering to existing stockholders and possible exchange offers
to holders of its preferred stock. During the first quarter of
2010, the Corporation filed a registration statement with the
SEC related to an offer to issue up to 130,835,337 million
shares of its common stock in exchange for its
Series A,B,C,D and E preferred stock. In addition, the
Corporation is also negotiating the issuance of shares of common
stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the preferred
stock it acquired under the Capital Purchase Program.
The Corporation must increase its common equity to provide
additional protection from the possibility that, due to the
current economic situation in Puerto Rico that has impacted the
Corporations asset quality and earnings performance, First
BanCorp will have to recognize additional loan loss reserves
against its loan portfolio and absorb the potential future
credit losses associated with the disposition of our non
performing assets. The Corporation has assured its regulators
that it is committed to raising capital and is actively pursuing
capital strengthening initiatives. Even though the Corporation
is well capitalized under capital regulatory
guidelines, if the Corporation is not able to increase its
capital in the near term, management believes that is likely
that our regulators could require us to execute certain informal
or formal written regulatory agreements that would have a
material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial
condition or results of operations and the value of our common
stock. The regulatory actions could require the Corporation to
raise capital within a specified time frame to maintain the
regulatory capital ratios at levels above the minimum amounts
required for well capitalized banks, and require the
Corporation to seek a waiver to continue to issue brokered
deposits, even at a reduced level.
In addition to raising capital, the Corporation is taking
actions to reduce its non-performing assets and return to
profitability to ensure long-term health while maintaining its
ability to meet its obligations in the foreseeable future (refer
to Liquidity discussion above for additional information). As of
March 31, 2010, the Corporations cash and cash
equivalents were $1.3 billion. With the additional capital
resulting from the success of the capital plans mentioned above,
the Corporation will significantly strengthen its balance sheet
and enhance its competitive position to continue executing its
organic growth strategies. The Corporation is actively
implementing other strategies to fortify its capital position,
including asset reductions, cost control strategies and the
suspension of dividends for common and preferred shareholders
since August 2009.
The Corporation is implementing steps to position itself to
benefit from the recent consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking
system. Subsequent to the consolidation of the Puerto Rico
banking industry that took place on April 30, 2010, no
disruptions have been noted. The reduction in the number of
competitors should bring significant opportunities to the
Corporation to enhance its short and long-term growth prospects.
In furtherance of its capital plan, on April 27, 2010,
First BanCorps stockholders approved a proposal to
increase the number of shares of common stock the Corporation is
authorized to issue from 250 million shares to
750 million shares. With the approval of this proposal,
First BanCorp may have enough authorized shares of common stock
to enable it to complete the capital transactions mentioned
above. In any event, New York Stock Exchange rules are likely to
require the approval of the sale of $500 million of shares
of common stock and the exchange offer by First BanCorps
stockholders unless the New York Stock Exchange approves a
request for an exemption from such a requirement.
83
Off
-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in
financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance
sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that
are different than the full contract or notional amount of the
transaction. These transactions are designed to (1) meet
the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the
Corporations credit, market or liquidity risks,
(3) diversify the Corporations funding sources and
(4) optimize capital.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely
enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the
financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments
may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit.
These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and
approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the
statement of financial position. As of March 31, 2010,
commitments to extend credit and commercial and financial
standby letters of credit amounted to approximately
$1.3 billion and $97.5 million, respectively.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers
as long as the conditions established in the contract are met.
Generally, the Corporations mortgage banking activities do
not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its
prospective borrowers.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the
Corporations contractual obligations and commitments,
which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations,
commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend
credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
After 5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit(1)
|
|
$
|
9,132,305
|
|
|
$
|
5,143,410
|
|
|
$
|
3,587,044
|
|
|
$
|
389,152
|
|
|
$
|
12,699
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
462,000
|
|
|
|
78,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,319
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
13,453,017
|
|
|
$
|
6,363,410
|
|
|
$
|
5,563,038
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,592
|
|
|
$
|
258,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
15,872
|
|
|
$
|
15,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
$
|
97,519
|
|
|
$
|
97,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit
|
|
$
|
992,472
|
|
|
$
|
992,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
58,446
|
|
|
|
58,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans
|
|
|
223,186
|
|
|
|
223,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$
|
1,274,104
|
|
|
$
|
1,274,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $7.4 billion of brokered CDs sold by third-party
intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC
insurance limits and $22.7 million in CDARS. |
84
The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future
payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, and
under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and
commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are
agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Other
contractual obligations result mainly from contracts for the
rental and maintenance of equipment. Since certain commitments
are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total
commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the
Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to
additional disbursements. There have been no significant or
unexpected draws on existing commitments. In the case of credit
cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can at any
time and without cause cancel the unused credit facility. In the
ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into
operating leases and other commercial commitments. There have
been no significant changes in such contractual obligations
since December 31, 2009.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate
swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed
to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation,
which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate
swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate
swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties
under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the
unpaid net cash settlement due as of March 31, 2010 under
the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured
counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This
exposure was reversed in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with
Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in
the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of
pledged securities with Lehman as of March 31, 2010
amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as
collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate
given the fact that the posted collateral constituted a
performance guarantee under the swap agreements, was not part of
a financing agreement, and ownership of the securities was never
transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate
swap agreements, Lehmans obligation was to return the
collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc.,
acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a
custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided
instructions to have most of the securities transferred to
Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal
to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month
of December 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays Capital
in federal court in New York demanding the return of the
securities.
During the month of February 2010, Barclays filed a motion with
the court requesting that the Corporations claim be
dismissed on the grounds that the allegations of the complaint
are not sufficient to justify the granting of the remedies
therein sought. Shortly thereafter, the Corporation filed its
opposition motion. A hearing on the motions was held in court on
April 28, 2010. The court on that date, after hearing the
arguments by both sides, concluded that the Corporations
equitable based causes of actions, upon which the return of the
investment securities are being demanded, contain allegations
that sufficiently plead facts warranting the denial of
Barclays motion to dismiss the Corporations claim.
Accordingly, the judge ordered the case to proceed to trial. A
scheduling conference for purposes of having the parties agree
to a discovery time table has been set for June 1, 2010.
While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support
its claim for the return of the securities, no assurances can be
given that it will ultimately succeed in its litigation against
Barclays Capital to recover all or a substantial portion
of the securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim
filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities
Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation
can provide no assurances that it will be successful in
recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through
these proceedings. An estimated loss was not accrued as the
Corporation is unable to determine the timing of the claim
resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a
substantial portion of the collateral or its equivalent value.
If additional negative relevant facts become available in future
periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this
claim may arise. Considering
85
that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by
the Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the
Corporation decided to classify such investments as
non-performing during 2009.
Interest
Rate Risk Management
First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to
limit the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest
income and to maintain stability in the profitability under
varying interest rate environments. The MIALCO oversees interest
rate risk and focuses on, among other things, current and
expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and
prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity,
securities market values, recent or proposed changes to the
investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and related
costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as
swaps and caps, and any tax or regulatory issues which may be
pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions
in light of the Corporations overall growth strategies and
objectives.
The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a consolidated net
interest income simulation analysis to estimate the potential
change in future earnings from projected changes in interest
rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-to five-year
time horizon, assuming gradual upward and downward interest rate
movements of 200 basis points, achieved during a
twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1) using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had it
on the simulation date, and
(2) using a dynamic balance sheet based on recent patterns
and current strategies.
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and
liabilities detailed by maturity or re-pricing and their
corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise
or fall, these simulations incorporate expected future lending
rates, current and expected future funding sources and costs,
the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates,
deposits decay and other factors which may be important in
projecting the future growth of net interest income.
The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future
movements in the Corporations balance sheet and income
statement. The starting point of the projections generally
corresponds to the actual values on the balance sheet on the
date of the simulations.
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying
assumptions that are intended to reflect the general behavior of
the Corporation over the period in question. It is highly
unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in all
cases. For this reason, the results of these simulations are
only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest
income to changes in market interest rates.
The following table presents the results of the simulations as
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Consistent
with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair
value of derivatives and liabilities measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Net Interest Income Risk
|
|
Net Interest Income Risk
|
|
|
(Projected for the Next 12 Months)
|
|
(Projected for the Next 12 Months)
|
|
|
Static Simulation
|
|
Growing Balance Sheet
|
|
Static Simulation
|
|
Growing Balance Sheet
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
+ 200 bps ramp
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
- 200 bps ramp
|
|
$
|
(30.5
|
)
|
|
|
(6.03
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(32.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.74
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(31.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.53
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(33.0
|
)
|
|
|
(6.98
|
)%
|
The Corporation continues to manage its balance sheet structure
to control the overall interest rate risk. As part of the
overall strategy, the Corporation continued to reduce the size
of its loan portfolio, reduce the amount of its long-term
fixed-rate and callable investment securities, and increase the
amount of its shorter-duration investment securities. During the
first quarter of 2010, approximately $450 million of Agency
MBS was sold (of which $57 million settled in April 2010),
while $275 million of US Agency debentures were called. Due
to current market conditions, high levels of MBS prepayments and
the exercise of the embedded calls on the remaining
U.S. agency debentures are expected. Proceeds from these
sales and calls, in
86
conjunction with prepayments on mortgage-backed securities, have
been maintained in overnight funds. In addition, the Corporation
continued adjusting the mix of its funding sources to better
match the expected average life of the assets. This strategy
causes an asset sensitive position, where net interest income is
expected to increase during the first twelve months of the
projection, in rising rates scenarios.
Taking into consideration the above-mentioned changes in assets
for modeling purposes, the net interest income for the next
twelve months under a non-static balance sheet scenario is
estimated to increase by $19.9 million in a gradual
parallel upward move of 200 basis points.
Following the Corporations risk management policies,
modeling of the downward parallel rates moves by
anchoring the short end of the curve, (falling rates with a
flattening curve) was performed, even though, given the current
level of rates as of March 31, 2010, some market interest
rate were projected to be zero. Under this scenario, where a
considerable spread compression is projected, net interest
income for the next twelve months in a non-static balance sheet
scenario is estimated to decrease by $32.9 million.
Derivatives
First BanCorp uses derivative instruments and other strategies
to manage its exposure to interest rate risk caused by changes
in interest rates beyond managements control.
The following summarizes major strategies, including derivative
activities, used by the Corporation in managing interest rate
risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest
rate cap agreements provide the right to receive cash if a
reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The
value increases as the reference interest rate rises. The
Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for
protection from rising interest rates. Specifically, the
interest rate on certain private label mortgage pass-through
securities and certain of the Corporations commercial
loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable
rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through
certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less
a contractual servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap
agreements generally involve the exchange of fixed and
floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange
of the underlying notional principal amount. As of
March 31, 2010, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding
are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the
past, interest rate swaps volume was much higher since they were
used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly
those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate
the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. All
interest rate swaps related to brokered CDs were called during
2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and, as a
consequence, the Corporation exercised its call option on the
swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs.
Structured repurchase agreements The
Corporation uses structured repurchase agreements, with embedded
call options, to reduce the Corporations exposure to
interest rate risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of
its liabilities, while keeping funding costs low. Another type
of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchase
agreements with embedded cap corridors; these instruments also
provide protection in a rising rate scenario.
For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative
activities (e.g. notional amounts), location and fair values of
derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition
and the amount of gains and losses reported in the Statement of
(Loss) Income, refer to Note 8 in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
87
The following tables summarize the fair value changes in the
Corporations derivatives as well as the sources of the
fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the
period
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
Changes in fair value during the period
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
(1,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source of
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
in Excess
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
of 5 Years
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing from observable market inputs
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,793
|
)
|
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(493
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject
to market risk. As is the case with investment securities, the
market value of derivative instruments is largely a function of
the financial markets expectations regarding the future
direction of interest rates. Accordingly, current market values
are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the
most part, on the shape of the yield curve as well as the level
of interest rates.
As of March 31, 2010, all of the derivative instruments
held by the Corporation were considered economic undesignated
hedges.
The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The
market risk of derivatives stems principally from the potential
for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on
changes in interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises
from the potential of default from the counterparty. To manage
this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of
good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements
whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral.
Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that
provide for the net settlement of contracts with the same
counterparty in the event of default. Currently the Corporation
is mostly engaged in derivative instruments with counterparties
with a credit rating of single A or better. All of the
Corporations interest rate swaps are supported by
securities collateral agreements, which allow the delivery of
securities to and from the counterparties depending on the fair
value of the instruments, to minimize credit risk.
Refer to Note 19 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements for additional information regarding the
fair value determination of derivative instruments.
Set forth below is a detailed analysis of the Corporations
credit exposure by counterparty with respect to derivative
instruments outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at
|
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest Receivable
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Rating(1)
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair Value(2)
|
|
|
Fair Values
|
|
|
Fair Values
|
|
|
(Payable)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan
|
|
A+
|
|
$
|
66,963
|
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
|
$
|
(4,644
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
|
|
A+
|
|
|
49,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
A
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
A
|
|
|
109,495
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,147
|
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
(5,091
|
)
|
|
|
(3,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives(3)
|
|
|
|
|
280,364
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,511
|
|
|
$
|
5,147
|
|
|
$
|
(6,453
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,306
|
)
|
|
$
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings. |
|
(2) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with
positive fair value excluding the related accrued interest
receivable / payable. |
|
(3) |
|
Credit exposure with several Puerto Rico counterparties for
which a credit rating is not readily available. Approximately
$3.5 million of the credit exposure with local companies
relates to caps referenced to mortgages bought from R&G
Premier Bank. This institution was acquired by the Bank of Nova
Scotia (Scotiabank) on April 30, 2010 through
an FDIC-assisted transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at
|
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest Receivable
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
Rating(1)
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair Value(2)
|
|
|
Fair Values
|
|
|
Fair Values
|
|
|
(Payable)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan
|
|
A+
|
|
$
|
67,345
|
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston
|
|
A+
|
|
|
49,311
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs
|
|
A
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
A
|
|
|
109,712
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,883
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
(5,068
|
)
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives(3)
|
|
|
|
|
284,619
|
|
|
|
4,518
|
|
|
|
(1,399
|
)
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
517,502
|
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
$
|
(6,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(531
|
)
|
|
$
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings. |
|
(2) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with
positive fair value excluding the related accrued interest
receivable / payable. |
|
(3) |
|
Credit exposure with several Puerto Rico counterparties for
which a credit rating is not readily available. Approximately
$4.2 million of the credit exposure with local companies
relates to caps referenced to mortgages bought from R&G
Premier Bank. This institution was acquired by the Bank of Nova
Scotia (Scotiabank) on April 30, 2010 through
an FDIC-assisted transaction. |
A Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach is used to
value the option components of derivative instruments. The
discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar
LIBOR-based discount rates or yield curves that account for the
industry sector and the credit rating of the counterparty
and/or the
89
Corporation. Although most of the derivative instruments are
fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those
that are not secured in full. The cumulative
mark-to-market
effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments
resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately
$0.5 million as of March 31, 2010, of which an
immaterial unrealized loss of $65,000 was recorded in the first
quarter of 2010 and an unrealized loss of $0.5 million was
recorded in the first quarter of 2009. The Corporation compares
the valuations obtained with valuations received from
counterparties, as an internal control procedure.
Credit
Risk Management
First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to
its portfolio of loans receivable and off-balance sheet
instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans
receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for
investment and, therefore, First BanCorp is at risk for the term
of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend
credit, subject to specific conditions, for specific amounts and
maturities. These commitments may expose the Corporation to
credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval
process as for loans. Refer to Contractual Obligations and
Commitments above for further details. The credit risk of
derivatives arises from the potential of the counterpartys
default on its contractual obligations. To manage this credit
risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit
standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever
possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. For further
details and information on the Corporations derivative
credit risk exposure, refer to the Interest Rate Risk
Management section above. The Corporation manages its
credit risk through credit policy, underwriting, independent
loan review and quality control procedures, comprehensive
financial analysis, and established management committees. The
Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss
mitigation efforts. Furthermore, there are structured loan
workout functions responsible for avoiding defaults and
minimizing losses upon default of each region and for each
business segment. The group utilizes relationship officers,
collection specialists and attorneys. In the case of residential
construction projects, the workout function monitors project
specifics, such as project management and marketing, as deemed
necessary.
The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities
portfolio. The securities held by the Corporation are
principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and
U.S. Treasury and agency securities. Thus, a substantial
portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a guarantee
of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or backed by the full
faith and credit of the U.S. government and is deemed to be
of the highest credit quality.
Management comprised of the Corporations Chief Credit Risk
Officer, Chief Lending Officer, and other senior executives, has
the primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the
Corporations credit risk goals and objectives. These goals
and objectives are documented in the Corporations Credit
Policy.
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing
Assets
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents the estimate
of the level of reserves appropriate to absorb inherent credit
losses. The amount of the allowance was determined by judgments
regarding the quality of each individual loan portfolio. All
known relevant internal and external factors that affected loan
collectibility were considered, including analyses of historical
charge-off experience, migration patterns, changes in economic
conditions, and changes in loan collateral values. For example,
factors affecting the Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), US Virgin
Islands or British Virgin Islands economies may
contribute to delinquencies and defaults above the
Corporations historical loan and lease losses. Such
factors are subject to regular review and may change to reflect
updated performance trends and expectations, particularly in
times of severe stress such as has been experienced since 2008.
We believe the process for determining the allowance considers
all of the potential factors that could result in credit losses.
However, the process includes judgmental and quantitative
elements that may be subject to significant change. There is no
certainty that the allowance will be adequate over time to cover
credit losses in the portfolio because of continued adverse
changes in the economy, market conditions, or events adversely
affecting specific customers, industries or markets. To the
extent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, the credit
quality of our customer base
90
materially decreases and the risk profile of a market, industry,
or group of customers changes materially, or if the allowance is
determined to not be adequate, additional provision for credit
losses could be required, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, liquidity, capital, and results
of operations in future periods.
The allowance for loan and lease losses provides for probable
losses that have been identified with specific valuation
allowances for individually evaluated impaired loans and for
probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio
that have not been specifically identified. Internal risk
ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of
approval and are subject to subsequent periodic reviews by the
Corporations senior management. The allowance for loan and
lease losses is reviewed on a quarterly basis as part of the
Corporations continued evaluation of its asset quality.
A specific valuation allowance is established for those
commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired,
primarily when the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired
loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present
value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the
loans effective rate is lower than the carrying amount of
that loan. To compute the specific valuation allowance,
commercial and real estate, including residential mortgage loans
with a principal balance of $1 million or more, are
evaluated individually as well as smaller residential mortgage
loans considered impaired based on their high delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels. When foreclosure is probable, the impairment is measured
based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the
collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated
appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that
loans are impaired and are updated annually thereafter. In
addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential
mortgage loans on a spot basis based on specific characteristics
such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and
loan-to-value
ratios. Deficiencies from the excess of the recorded investment
in collateral dependent loans over the resulting fair value of
the collateral are generally charged-off when deemed
uncollectible.
For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans,
such as auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans,
residential mortgages, and commercial and construction loans not
considered impaired or in amounts under $1 million, the
Corporation maintains a general valuation allowance. The
methodology to compute the general valuation allowance has not
change in the past 9 quarters. The Corporation updates the
factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly
basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying
loss factors according to the loan type and assigned risk
category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired;
all doubtful loans are considered impaired). The general reserve
for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency
trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical
location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and
other environmental factors such as economic forecasts. The
analysis of the residential mortgage pools is performed at the
individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the
expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment
curves, default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the
pool. The severity is affected by the expected house price
scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are
used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The
risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and associated costs are
used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area in which
the property is located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or Virgin
Islands). For commercial loans, including construction loans,
the general reserve is based on historical loss ratios, trends
in non-accrual loans, loan type, risk-rating, geographical
location, changes in collateral values for collateral dependent
loans and gross product or unemployment data for the
geographical region. The methodology of accounting for all
probable losses in loans not individually measured for
impairment purposes is made in accordance with authoritative
accounting guidance that requires losses be accrued when they
are probable of occurring and estimable.
The blended general reserve factors utilized for all portfolios
increased during 2010 due to the continued increase in
charge-offs and the deterioration in the economy and property
values. The blended general reserve factor for residential
mortgage loans increased from 0.91% in December 2009 to 1.45% at
March 31, 2010. For commercial mortgage loans the blended
general reserve factor increased from 2.41% in December 2009 to
2.85% at March 31, 2010. The construction loans blended
general factor increased from 9.82% in December, 2009 to 12.64%
at March 31, 2010. The consumer and finance leases reserve
factor increased from 4.36% in December 2009 to 4.41% at
March 31, 2010. The C&I blended general reserve factor
decreased from 2.44% in December 2009 to 1.78% at March 31,
2020 due to lower charge-offs. Most of the charge-off recorded
in
91
the first quarter of 2010 was related to a single loan to a
local financial institution that was adequately reserved prior
to 2010.
Substantially all of the Corporations loan portfolio is
located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether
the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. and
British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland (mainly in the
state of Florida), the performance of the Corporations
loan portfolio and the value of the collateral supporting the
transactions are dependent upon the performance of and
conditions within each specific area real estate market. Recent
economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto
Rico indicate that the real estate market is experiencing
readjustments in value driven by the deteriorated purchasing
power of consumers and general economic conditions. The
Corporation sets adequate
loan-to-value
ratios upon original approval following the regulatory and
credit policy standards. The real estate market for the
U.S. Virgin Islands remains fairly stable. In the Florida
market, residential real estate has experienced a very slow
turnover, but the Corporation continues to reduce its credit
exposure through disposition of assets and different loss
mitigation initiatives as the end of this difficult credit cycle
in the Florida region is approaching.
As shown in the following table, the allowance for loan and
lease losses increased to $575.3 million at March 31,
2010, compared with $528.1 million at December 31,
2009. Expressed as a percent of period-end total loans
receivable, the ratio increased to 4.33% at March 31,2010,
compared with 3.79% at December 31, 2009. The
$47.2 million increase in the allowance primarily reflected
increases in specific reserves associated with impaired loans,
predominantly in construction and commercial mortgage loans. The
increase is also a result of adjustments to loss rate factors
used to determine general reserves primarily to account for the
increase in net charge-offs. Refer to the Provision for
Loan and Lease Losses discussion above for additional
information. The following table sets forth an analysis of the
activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses during the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
$
|
281,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (recovery) for loan and lease losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
28,739
|
|
|
|
13,249
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
37,719
|
|
|
|
3,645
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
(7,844
|
)
|
|
|
6,375
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
99,300
|
|
|
|
30,557
|
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
13,051
|
|
|
|
5,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
59,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
(13,346
|
)
|
|
|
(7,162
|
)
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
(19,318
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
(23,922
|
)
|
|
|
(7,621
|
)
|
Construction
|
|
|
(53,323
|
)
|
|
|
(8,534
|
)
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
(16,397
|
)
|
|
|
(18,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126,306
|
)
|
|
|
(42,460
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
4,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(123,782
|
)
|
|
|
(38,424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period
|
|
$
|
575,303
|
|
|
$
|
302,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to period end total loans
receivable
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
Net charge-offs annualized to average loans outstanding during
the period
|
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during
the period
|
|
|
1.38
|
x
|
|
|
1.55
|
x
|
The following table sets forth information concerning the
allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan
category and the percentage of loan balances in each category to
the total of such loans as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
46,558
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
82,394
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
63,972
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
210,213
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
164,128
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial loans (including loans to a local
financial institution)
|
|
|
154,387
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
186,007
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Consumer loans and finance leases
|
|
|
81,751
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
82,848
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
575,303
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
The following table sets forth information concerning the
composition of the Corporations allowance for loan and
lease losses as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related
provisions were calculated individually or through a general
valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
C&I Loans
|
|
Loans
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
$
|
444,948
|
|
|
$
|
31,819
|
|
|
$
|
75,422
|
|
|
$
|
183,456
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,645
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
|
51,020
|
|
|
|
201,660
|
|
|
|
265,799
|
|
|
|
591,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110,441
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
1,975
|
|
|
|
44,878
|
|
|
|
74,408
|
|
|
|
124,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,300
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
22.25
|
%
|
|
|
27.99
|
%
|
|
|
20.95
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
22.09
|
%
|
Loans with general allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
|
3,082,674
|
|
|
|
1,314,228
|
|
|
|
4,496,585
|
|
|
|
681,609
|
|
|
|
1,852,385
|
|
|
|
11,427,481
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
44,583
|
|
|
|
37,516
|
|
|
|
79,979
|
|
|
|
86,174
|
|
|
|
81,751
|
|
|
|
330,003
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
1.45
|
%
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
12.64
|
%
|
|
|
4.41
|
%
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
$
|
3,578,642
|
|
|
$
|
1,547,707
|
|
|
$
|
4,837,806
|
|
|
$
|
1,457,027
|
|
|
$
|
1,852,385
|
|
|
$
|
13,273,567
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
46,558
|
|
|
|
82,394
|
|
|
|
154,387
|
|
|
|
210,213
|
|
|
|
81,751
|
|
|
|
575,303
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
14.43
|
%
|
|
|
4.41
|
%
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
$
|
384,285
|
|
|
$
|
62,920
|
|
|
$
|
48,943
|
|
|
$
|
100,028
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
596,176
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs
|
|
|
60,040
|
|
|
|
159,284
|
|
|
|
243,123
|
|
|
|
597,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,088
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
30,945
|
|
|
|
62,491
|
|
|
|
86,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,145
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
19.43
|
%
|
|
|
25.70
|
%
|
|
|
14.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
17.18
|
%
|
Loans with general allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
|
3,151,183
|
|
|
|
1,368,617
|
|
|
|
5,059,363
|
|
|
|
794,920
|
|
|
|
1,898,104
|
|
|
|
12,272,187
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
28,549
|
|
|
|
33,027
|
|
|
|
123,516
|
|
|
|
78,035
|
|
|
|
82,848
|
|
|
|
345,975
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
2.41
|
%
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
9.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
2.82
|
%
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans
|
|
$
|
3,595,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,590,821
|
|
|
$
|
5,351,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,492,589
|
|
|
$
|
1,898,104
|
|
|
$
|
13,928,451
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
31,165
|
|
|
|
63,972
|
|
|
|
186,007
|
|
|
|
164,128
|
|
|
|
82,848
|
|
|
|
528,120
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to principal balance
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
11.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
The following tables show the activity for impaired loans and
the related specific reserves during the first quarter of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,656,264
|
|
Loans determined impaired during the period
|
|
|
317,333
|
|
Net charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
(101,259
|
)
|
Loans sold, net of charge-offs of $12.7 million(2)
|
|
|
(18,749
|
)
|
Loans foreclosed, paid in full and partial payments, net of
additional disbursements
|
|
|
(7,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,846,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Approximately $52.3 million, or 52%, is related to
contruction loans ($33.7 million in Puerto Rico and
$18.6 million in Florida). Also, approximately
$15.0 million, or 15%, related to a commercial loan
extended to a local financial institution. |
|
(2) |
|
Associated with two commercial mortgage (originally disbursed as
condo-conversion) loans sold in Florida. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
C&I Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,616
|
|
|
$
|
30,945
|
|
|
$
|
62,491
|
|
|
$
|
86,093
|
|
|
$
|
182,145
|
|
Provision for impaired loans
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
|
|
31,362
|
|
|
|
33,655
|
|
|
|
90,260
|
|
|
|
164,414
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(9,778
|
)
|
|
|
(17,429
|
)
|
|
|
(21,738
|
)
|
|
|
(52,314
|
)
|
|
|
(101,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,975
|
|
|
$
|
44,878
|
|
|
$
|
74,408
|
|
|
$
|
124,039
|
|
|
$
|
245,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the present economic outlook in the Corporations
principal markets and in spite of actions taken, the Corporation
may experience further deterioration in its portfolios, which
may result in higher credit losses and additions to reserve
balances.
Credit
Quality
Though credit quality remained under pressure in the first
quarter of 2010 and the performance was negatively impacted by
the sustained economic weakness in Puerto Rico, there were some
positive signs. For example, the level of non-performing loans
increased at a much lower rate than the increases observed
during most of 2009. Also, there was an overall decline in
non-accrual loans in the United States and absorption rates on
residential construction projects financed by the Corporation
increased over the last two quarters.
Non-accrual
Loans and Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans,
foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties as well
as non-performing investment securities. Non-accrual loans are
those loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued.
When a loan is placed in non-accrual status, any interest
previously recognized and not collected is reversed and charged
against interest income.
Non-accrual
Loans Policy
Residential Real Estate Loans The Corporation
classifies real estate loans in non-accrual status when interest
and principal have not been received for a period of
90 days or more.
Commercial and Construction Loans The
Corporation places commercial loans (including commercial real
estate and construction loans) in non-accrual status when
interest and principal have not been received for a period of
90 days or more or when there are doubts about the
potential to collect all of the principal based on collateral
deficiencies or, in other situations, when collection of all of
principal or interest is not expected due to deterioration in
the financial condition of the borrower. Cash payments received
on certain loans that are impaired and collateral dependent are
recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loans. The principal portion of the payment is used
to reduce the principal balance of the loan, whereas the
interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected).
However, when management believes that the ultimate
collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion is
applied to principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is
diversified as to individual borrowers and industries among
other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real
estate collateral.
Finance Leases Finance leases are classified
in non-accrual status when interest and principal have not been
received for a period of 90 days or more.
95
Consumer Loans Consumer loans are classified
in non-accrual status when interest and principal have not been
received for a period of 90 days or more.
Other
Real Estate Owned (OREO)
OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of
cost (carrying value of the loan) or fair value less estimated
costs to sell off the real estate at the date of acquisition
(estimated realizable value).
Other
Repossessed Property
The other repossessed property category includes repossessed
boats and autos acquired in settlement of loans. Repossessed
boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated
fair value.
Investment
Securities
This category presents investment securities reclassified to
non-accrual status, at their book value.
Past
Due Loans
Past due loans are accruing loans which are contractually
delinquent 90 days or more. Past due loans are either
current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of
principal or are insured or guaranteed under applicable FHA and
VA programs.
The Corporation has in place loan loss mitigation programs
providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified
through this program are reported as non-accrual loans and
interest is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable
assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a
sustained period, the loan is returned to accrual status.
The following table presents non-performing assets as of the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
446,676
|
|
|
|
441,642
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
230,468
|
|
|
|
196,535
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
228,113
|
|
|
|
241,316
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
685,415
|
|
|
|
634,329
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
4,735
|
|
|
|
5,207
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
43,937
|
|
|
|
44,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
1,639,344
|
|
|
|
1,563,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
69,304
|
|
Other repossessed property
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
12,898
|
|
Investment securities(1)
|
|
|
64,543
|
|
|
|
64,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
1,789,795
|
|
|
$
|
1,710,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
189,647
|
|
|
$
|
165,936
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
9.49
|
%
|
|
|
8.71
|
%
|
Non-accrual loans to total loans receivable
|
|
|
12.35
|
%
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
$
|
575,303
|
|
|
$
|
528,120
|
|
Allowance to total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
35.09
|
%
|
|
|
33.77
|
%
|
Allowance to total non-accrual loans, excluding residential real
estate loans
|
|
|
48.24
|
%
|
|
|
47.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Collateral pledged with Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. |
96
The following table shows non-performing assets by geographic
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
386,517
|
|
|
$
|
376,018
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
148,173
|
|
|
|
128,001
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
219,196
|
|
|
|
229,039
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
455,919
|
|
|
|
385,259
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
4,735
|
|
|
|
5,207
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
40,504
|
|
|
|
40,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
1,255,044
|
|
|
|
1,163,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
50,470
|
|
|
|
49,337
|
|
Other repossessed property
|
|
|
11,921
|
|
|
|
12,634
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
64,543
|
|
|
|
64,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
1,381,978
|
|
|
$
|
1,290,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
180,399
|
|
|
$
|
128,016
|
|
Virgin Islands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
10,726
|
|
|
$
|
9,063
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
11,726
|
|
|
|
11,727
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
2,796
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
31,694
|
|
|
|
35,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
Other repossessed property
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
32,494
|
|
|
$
|
36,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
8,689
|
|
|
$
|
23,876
|
|
Florida:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
49,433
|
|
|
$
|
56,561
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
70,569
|
|
|
|
56,807
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
226,610
|
|
|
|
246,274
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
352,606
|
|
|
|
364,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
22,504
|
|
|
|
19,497
|
|
Other repossessed property
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
375,323
|
|
|
$
|
384,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
14,044
|
|
97
Total non-accrual loans were $1.63 billion at
March 31, 2010, and represented 12.35% of total loans
receivable. This was up $75.5 million, or 4.83%, from
$1.56 billion, or 11.23% of total loans receivable, at
December 31, 2009. The increase from the fourth quarter of
2009 primarily reflected increases in construction and
commercial mortgage loans.
Total non-accrual construction loans increased
$51.1 million, or 8%, from the end of the fourth quarter.
The increase was mainly in Puerto Rico where non-accrual
construction loans increased by $70.7 million. The increase
was primarily concentrated in three relationships with an
aggregate balance of $58.1 million that entered into
non-accrual status during the first quarter, partially offset by
charge-offs. Two of these three relationships, or
$33.4 million, are associated with residential housing
projects and the remaining relationship is related to a
commercial project in Puerto Rico.
Non-accrual construction loans in Florida decreased by
$19.7 million from the end of the fourth quarter of 2009.
The decrease was a function of both charge-off activity as well
as problem credit resolutions, including a restructured loan
with an outstanding balance of $9.3 million restored to
accrual status after a sustained period of repayment and
currently in compliance with modified terms.
Non-accrual commercial mortgage loans increased by
$33.9 million, or 17%, from the end of the fourth quarter.
The increase was spread through our geographic segments. Total
non-accrual commercial mortgage loans in Puerto Rico increased
by $20.2 million primarily related to a $14.9 million
strip mall relationship. Non-accrual commercial mortgage loans
in Florida increased by $13.8 million mainly related to a
single $12.5 million relationship engaged in the
acquisition of apartment complexes.
Non-accrual residential mortgage loans, which increased by
$5.0 million, or 1%, mainly in Puerto Rico, were adversely
affected by the continued trend of higher unemployment rates
affecting consumers, partially offset by a decrease in the
Florida portfolio. Non-accrual residential mortgage loans in
Puerto Rico increased by $10.5 million, or 3%, from the end
of the fourth quarter. Efforts to proactively address existing
issues with loss mitigation and loan modification transactions
have helped to minimize the inflow of new non-accrual loans.
Approximately $336.0 million, or 75% of total non-accrual
residential mortgage loans, have been written down to their net
realizable value. In Florida, there was an overall decrease of
$7.1 million in non-accrual residential mortgage loans
mainly due to loans foreclosed and charge-offs. During the first
quarter, the non-accrual residential mortgage loan portfolio in
the Virgin Islands increased by $1.7 million.
C&I non-accrual loans decreased $13.2 million, or 5%,
from the end of the fourth quarter. The decrease resulted from
charge-offs, including a charge-off of $15.0 million
associated with a loan extended to a local financial institution
in Puerto Rico, and approximately $3.6 million related to
the restoration to accrual status of restructured loans after a
sustained period of repayment and pay-downs. This was partially
offset by the inflow of non-accrual loans during the quarter,
mainly in Puerto Rico and spread throughout several industries.
The levels of non-accrual consumer loans, including finance
leases, remained stable showing a $1.4 million decrease
during the first quarter. This resulted from a $1.8 million
decrease in the Virgin Islands portfolio and a $0.6 million
increase in the Florida portfolio. Non-accrual consumer loans in
Puerto Rico remained essentially unchanged from the fourth
quarter of 2009 with an increase of $0.1 million.
At March 31, 2010, approximately $196.3 million of
loans placed in non-accrual status, mainly construction and
commercial loans, were current or had delinquencies of less than
90 days in their interest payments. Collections are being
recorded on a cash basis through earnings, or on a cost-recovery
basis, as conditions warrant.
During the first quarter of 2010, interest income of
approximately $1.6 million related to $938.6 million
of non-accrual loans, mainly non-accrual construction and
commercial loans, was applied against the related principal
balances under the cost-recovery method. The Corporation will
continue to evaluate restructuring alternatives to mitigate
losses and enable borrowers to repay their loans under revised
terms in an effort to preserve the value of the
Corporations interests over the long-term.
The allowance to non-performing loans ratio as of March 31,
2010 was 35.09%, compared to 33.77% as of December 31,
2009. The increase in the ratio is attributable in part to
increases in reserve factors for
98
classified loans and additional charges to specific reserves. As
of March 31, 2010, approximately $497.2 million, or
30%, of total non- performing loans have been charged-off to
their net realizable value as shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Consumer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
C&I Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
$
|
335,983
|
|
|
$
|
17,497
|
|
|
$
|
34,028
|
|
|
$
|
109,693
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
497,201
|
|
Other non-performing loans
|
|
|
110,693
|
|
|
|
212,971
|
|
|
|
194,085
|
|
|
|
575,722
|
|
|
|
48,672
|
|
|
|
1,142,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
446,676
|
|
|
$
|
230,468
|
|
|
$
|
228,113
|
|
|
$
|
685,415
|
|
|
$
|
48,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,639,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans
|
|
|
10.42
|
%
|
|
|
35.75
|
%
|
|
|
67.68
|
%
|
|
|
30.67
|
%
|
|
|
167.96
|
%
|
|
|
35.09
|
%
|
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding non-performing
loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
|
42.06
|
%
|
|
|
38.69
|
%
|
|
|
79.55
|
%
|
|
|
36.51
|
%
|
|
|
167.96
|
%
|
|
|
50.37
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
$
|
320,224
|
|
|
$
|
38,421
|
|
|
$
|
19,244
|
|
|
$
|
139,787
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
517,676
|
|
Other non-performing loans
|
|
|
121,418
|
|
|
|
158,114
|
|
|
|
222,072
|
|
|
|
494,542
|
|
|
|
50,041
|
|
|
|
1,046,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
441,642
|
|
|
$
|
196,535
|
|
|
$
|
241,316
|
|
|
$
|
634,329
|
|
|
$
|
50,041
|
|
|
$
|
1,563,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans
|
|
|
7.06
|
%
|
|
|
32.55
|
%
|
|
|
77.08
|
%
|
|
|
25.87
|
%
|
|
|
165.56
|
%
|
|
|
33.77
|
%
|
Allowance to non-performing loans, excluding non-performing
loans charged-off to realizable value
|
|
|
25.67
|
%
|
|
|
40.46
|
%
|
|
|
83.76
|
%
|
|
|
33.19
|
%
|
|
|
165.56
|
%
|
|
|
50.48
|
%
|
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance
to its customers through a loss mitigation program in Puerto
Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government.
Due to the nature of the borrowers financial condition,
restructurings or loan modifications through these program as
well as other restructurings of individual commercial,
commercial mortgage loans, construction loans and residential
mortgages in the U.S. mainland fit the definition of
Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR). A restructuring
of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or
legal reasons related to the debtors financial
difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. Modifications involve changes in one or more
of the loan terms that bring a defaulted loan current and
provide sustainable affordability. Changes may include the
refinancing of any past-due amounts, including interest and
escrow, the extension of the maturity of the loans and
modifications of the loan rate. As of March 31, 2010, the
Corporations TDR loans consisted of $169.4 million of
residential mortgage loans, $44.8 million commercial and
industrial loans, $81.5 million commercial mortgage loans
and $89.8 million of construction loans. From the
$385.5 million total TDR loans, approximately
$148.3 million are in compliance with modified terms,
$30.2 million are
30-89 days
delinquent, and $207.0 million are classified as
non-accrual as of March 31,2010.
Included in the $385.5 million of TDR loans are certain
impaired condo-conversion loans restructured into two separate
agreements (loan splitting) in the fourth quarter of 2009. At
that time, each of these loans was restructured into two notes,
one that represents the portion of the loan that is expected to
be fully collected along with contractual interest and the
second note that represents the portion of the original loan
that was charged-off. The restructuring of these loans was made
after analyzing the borrowers and guarantors
capacity to service the debt and ability to perform under the
modified terms. As part of the restructuring of the
99
loans, the first note of each loan have been placed on a monthly
payment of principal and interest that amortize the debt over
25 years at a market rate of interest. An interest rate
reduction was granted for the second note. The carrying value of
the notes deemed collectible amounted to $22.0 million as
of March 31, 2010 and the charge-offs recorded prior to
2010 associated with these loans were $29.7 million. The
loans that have been deemed collectible continue to be
individually evaluated for impairment purposes and a specific
reserve of $3.4 million was allocated to these loans as of
March 31, 2010.
Total non-performing assets, which include non-accrual loans,
were $1.79 billion at March 31, 2010. This was up
$79.2 million, or 5%, from $1.71 billion at the end of
the fourth quarter of 2009. During the first quarter of 2010,
the Corporation sold approximately $6.0 million of REO
properties at or close to their carrying amounts, thus no
significant gains or losses were recorded at the time of sale.
The over
90-day
delinquent, but still accruing, loans to total loans receivable
ratio, excluding loans guaranteed by the U.S. Government,
was 0.88% at March 31, 2010, up from 0.69% at the end of
the fourth quarter, but down 39 basis points from a
year-ago.
Net
Charge-offs and Total Credit Losses
Total net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2010 were
$123.8 million or 3.65% of average loans on an annualized
basis, compared to $38.4 million or an annualized 1.16% of
average loans for the first quarter of 2009. Even though the
increase in net charge-offs in absolute numbers was higher in
Puerto Rico, loss rates (charge-offs to average loans) for all
major loan categories continued to be significantly higher in
the United States than in Puerto Rico.
Construction loans net charge-offs in the first quarter were
$53.2 million, or an annualized 14.35% of related loans, up
from $8.5 million, or an annualized 2.21% of related loans,
in the first quarter of 2009. First quarter results were
substantially impacted by individual charge-offs in excess of
$5 million. There was $33.5 million associated with
three residential housing projects. The increase from the prior
quarter was related to both the Puerto Rico and the Florida
portfolios. Construction loans net charge-offs in Puerto Rico
were $33.7 million, an increase of $26.9 million over
first quarter 2009 levels, including $18.5 million
associated with two residential projects. Construction loans net
charge-offs in the United States of $19.5 million, or
$17.7 million above first quarter 2009 levels, were mainly
related to a single residential project that was previously
reserved. The Corporation continued its ongoing management
efforts including obtaining updated appraisals on properties and
assessing a projects status within the context of market
environment expectations. This portfolio remains susceptible to
the ongoing housing market disruptions, particularly in Puerto
Rico. In the United States, based on the portfolio management
process, including charge-off activity over the past year and
several sales of problem credits, the credit issues in this
portfolio have been substantially addressed. The Corporation is
engaged in continuous efforts to identify alternatives that
enable borrowers to repay their loans while protecting the
Corporations investments.
C&I loans net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2010 were
$23.8 million, or an annualized 1.88% of related loans, an
increase of $16.4 million when compared to the
$7.4 million, or an annualized 0.65%, recorded in the 2009
first quarter. There was a $15.0 million charge-off
associated with a loan extended to a local financial institution
that was adequately reserved prior to 2010. Remaining C&I
loans net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2010 were
concentrated in Puerto Rico, distributed across several
industries, with the largest individual charge-off amounting to
$1.2 million.
Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs in the first quarter
of 2010 were $19.3 million, or an annualized 4.85%, a
$18.8 million increase from the fourth quarter of 2009.
First quarter results were substantially impacted by charge-offs
of $13.9 million associated with two impaired loans in
Florida that were sold during the first quarter. These loans,
which in aggregate amounted to $31.4 million, were
adequately reserved prior to 2010 and additional charges to the
reserve during the first quarter were not necessary.
Residential mortgage net charge-offs were $13.3 million, or
an annualized 1.50% of related average loans. This was up from
$7.2 million, or an annualized 0.82%, of related average
balances in the first quarter of 2009. The higher loss level
compared with the prior quarter reflected increases in
delinquency levels, resulting
100
from continued deterioration in economic conditions in Puerto
Rico and high unemployment levels, as well as reductions in
property values. Reductions in property values were validated by
a study conducted by an independent consulting firm that
performed a review of the residential real estate loan portfolio
in Puerto Rico. This review included, among other things, the
purchase of realtors and appraisers data to confirm
recent property values. Approximately $9.8 million in
charge-offs for the first quarter ($5.2 million in Puerto
Rico, $4.1 million in Florida and $0.5 million in
Virgin Islands) resulted from valuations, for impairment
purposes, of residential mortgage loan portfolios considered
homogeneous given high delinquency and
loan-to-value
levels, compared to $2.2 million recorded in the first
quarter of 2009. Total residential mortgage loans evaluated for
impairment purposes amounted to approximately
$336.0 million as of March 31, 2010, and have been
charged-off to their net realizable value, representing
approximately 75% of the total non-performing residential
mortgage loan portfolio outstanding as of March 31, 2010.
Net charge-offs for residential mortgage loans also include
$3.3 million related to loans foreclosed during the first
quarter, down from $4.9 million recorded for loans
foreclosed in the fourth quarter. Consistent with the
Corporations assessment of the value of properties and
current and future market conditions, management is executing
strategies to accelerate the sale of the real estate acquired in
satisfaction of debt (REO). The ratio of net charge-offs to
average loans on the Corporations residential mortgage
loan portfolio of 1.50% for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 is lower than the approximately 2.74% average charge-off
rate for commercial banks in the U.S. mainland for the
fourth quarter of 2009, as per statistical releases published by
the Federal Reserve, and loss rates in the Corporations
Puerto Rico operations are more than five times lower than loss
rates experienced by the Corporation in the Florida market.
Net charge-offs of consumer loans and finance leases in the
first quarter of 2010 were $14.1 million compared to net
charge-offs of $14.8 million for the first quarter of 2009.
Annualized net charge-offs as a percent of related loans
increased to 3.01% from 2.84% for the first quarter of 2009.
Performance of this portfolio on absolute terms continued to be
consistent with managements views regarding the underlying
quality of the portfolio. The level of delinquencies has
improved compared to the trailing fourth quarter of 2009,
further supporting managements views of improved
performance going forward.
The following table presents annualized charge-offs to average
loans
held-in-portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
3.01
|
%
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
The above ratios are based on annualized charge-offs and are not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire
year or in subsequent periods.
101
The following table presents charge-offs (annualized) to average
loans
held-in-portfolio
by geographic segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
PUERTO RICO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
1.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
13.45
|
%
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
VIRGIN ISLANDS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial(1)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)%
|
|
|
0.56
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
3.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
FLORIDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
13.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
10.78
|
%
|
|
|
6.28
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
27.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
Consumer and finance leases
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
9.95
|
%
|
Total loans
|
|
|
13.90
|
%
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the first quarter of 2010, recoveries in commercial and
industrial loans in the Virgin Islands exceeded charge-offs. |
Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus losses on REO
operations) for the first quarter ended March 31, 2010
amounted to $127.5 million, or 3.84% on an annualized basis
to average loans and repossessed assets in contrast to credit
losses of $43.8 million, or a loss rate of 1.32%, for the
first quarter of 2009.
The following table presents a detail of the REO inventory and
credit losses for the periods indicated:
Credit
Loss Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
REO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO balances, carrying value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
38,851
|
|
|
$
|
31,460
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
20,322
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
Condo-conversion projects
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
6,271
|
|
|
|
5,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
73,444
|
|
|
$
|
49,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
REO activity (number of properties):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning property inventory,
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Properties acquired
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Properties disposed
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending property inventory
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average holding period (in days)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Condo-conversion projects
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
REO operations (loss) gain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market adjustments and (losses) gain on sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,185
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
Condo-conversion projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,872
|
)
|
|
|
(4,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other REO operations expenses
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss on REO operations
|
|
$
|
(3,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-OFFS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential charge-offs, net
|
|
$
|
(13,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,162
|
)
|
Commercial charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(43,073
|
)
|
|
|
(7,907
|
)
|
Construction charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(53,215
|
)
|
|
|
(8,523
|
)
|
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(14,148
|
)
|
|
|
(14,832
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs, net
|
|
|
(123,782
|
)
|
|
|
(38,424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES(1)
|
|
$
|
(127,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Commercial
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
14.21
|
%
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO(3)
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equal to REO operations (losses) gains plus Charge-offs, net. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments and gains
(losses) on sale of REO divided by average loans and repossessed
assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on REO operations
divided by average loans and repossessed assets. |
103
Operational
Risk
The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory
pressure related to the activities that surround the delivery of
banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences
such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the
potential for operational and reputational loss has increased.
In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the
Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific
internal controls, policies and procedures that are designated
to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels
throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is
to provide reasonable assurance that the Corporations
business operations are functioning within the policies and
limits established by management.
The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major
categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all
business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment
group works with the various business units to ensure
consistency in policies, processes and assessments. With respect
to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business
recovery, legal and compliance, the Corporation has specialized
groups, such as the Legal Department, Information Security,
Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations.
These groups assist the lines of business in the development and
implementation of risk management practices specific to the
needs of the business groups.
Legal and
Compliance Risk
Legal and compliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance
with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the risk of
adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk
that a counterpartys performance obligations will be
unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to extensive
regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it conducts
it business, and this regulatory scrutiny has been significantly
increasing over the last several years. The Corporation has
established and continues to enhance procedures based on legal
and regulatory requirements that are designed to ensure
compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance Director who
reports to the Chief Risk Officer and is responsible for the
oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an
enterprise-wide compliance risk assessment process. The
Compliance division has officer roles in each major business
areas with direct reporting relationships to the Corporate
Compliance Group.
Concentration
Risk
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically
concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. However,
the Corporation continues diversifying its geographical risk as
evidenced by its operations in the Virgin Islands and in Florida.
As of March 31, 2010, the Corporation had
$677.1 million outstanding of credit facilities granted to
the Puerto Rico government
and/or its
political subdivisions and $165.5 million granted to the
Virgin Islands government. A substantial portion of these credit
facilities are obligations that have a specific source of income
or revenues identified for their repayment, such as property
taxes collected by the central Government
and/or
municipalities. Another portion of these obligations consists of
loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates
charged for services or products, such as electric power and
water utilities. Such corporations have varying degrees of
independence from the central Government and many receive
appropriations or other payments from it. The Corporation also
has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the
good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable
municipality have been pledged to their repayment.
Aside from loans extended to the Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
government, the largest loan to one borrower as of
March 31, 2010 in the amount of $314.6 million is with
one mortgage originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial
Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. Of the
total gross loan portfolio of $13.3 billion as of
March 31, 2010, approximately 83% have credit risk
concentration in Puerto Rico, 9% in the United States and 8% in
the Virgin Islands
104
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For information regarding market risk to which the Corporation
is exposed, see the information contained in
Part I Item 2
-Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Risk
Management.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure
Control and Procedures
First BanCorps management, including its Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of the design and operation of First BanCorps disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of
March 31, 2010. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes to the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this
report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the opinion of the Companys management, the pending and
threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will
not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of
the Corporation.
Our business, operating results
and/or the
market price of our common and preferred stock may be
significantly affected by a number of factors. For a detailed
discussion of certain risk factors that could affect the
Corporations operations, financial condition or results
for future periods see the risk factors below and Item 1A,
Risk Factors, in the Corporations 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
These factors could also cause actual results to differ
materially from historical results or the results contemplated
by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also
refer to the discussion in Part I
Item 2 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in this report for additional information that may supplement or
update the discussion of risk factors in the Corporations
2009
Form 10-K.
The risks described in the Corporations 2009
Form 10-K
and in this report are not the only risks facing the
Corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to the Corporation or currently deemed by the Corporation
to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the
Corporations business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Regulatory
actions could have a material effect on our business,
operations, financial condition or results of operations or the
value of our common stock.
Although as of March 31, 2010 the amounts of the
Corporations and its subsidiary banks capital
exceeded the minimum amounts required for them to qualify as
well capitalized for regulatory purposes, the
Corporation must increase its common equity to provide
additional protection from the possibility that, due to the
current economic situation in Puerto Rico that has impacted the
Corporations asset quality and earnings performance, First
BanCorp could have to recognize additional loan loss reserves
against its loan portfolio and absorb the potential future
credit losses associated with the disposition of non-performing
assets. The Corporation has assured its regulators that it is
committed to raising capital and is actively pursuing capital
105
strengthening initiatives. If we are not able to increase our
capital in the near term, we believe that it is likely that our
regulators could require us to execute certain informal or
formal written regulatory agreements that could materially
affect our business, operations, financial condition, results of
operations or the value of our common stock. The regulatory
actions could require the Corporation to raise capital within a
specified time frame to maintain the regulatory ratios at levels
above the minimum amounts required for well
capitalized banks and require the Corporation to seek a
waiver to continue to issue brokered CDs, even at a reduced
level.
|
|
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation, as amended on April 27, 2010.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
12
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
106
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized:
First BanCorp.
Registrant
Aurelio Alemán
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 10, 2010
Orlando Berges
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 10, 2010
107
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY. We encourage you to take advantage of Internet or
telephone voting. Both are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Internet and telephone voting
is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time the day prior to the stockholder meeting date. INTERNET
http://www.proxyvoting.com/fbp Use the Internet to vote your proxy. First BanCorp Have your proxy
card in hand when you access the web site. OR TELEPHONE 1-866-540-5760 Use any touch-tone telephone
to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call. If you vote your proxy by Internet
or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. To vote by mail, mark, sign and date
your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Your Internet or telephone
vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed
and returned your proxy card. WO# 79513 FOLD AND DETACH HERE Please mark your votes as indicated in
this example X THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE
VOTED FOR ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (1 ) To approve the issuance
of shares of First BanCorps Common Stock (4) To approve the issuance of shares of First BanCorps
in exchange (the Exchange Offer) for shares of First BanCorps Common Stock to The Bank of Nova
Scotia in connection Noncumulative, Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, with the
Exchange Offer, in accordance with applicable New B, C, D and E, in accordance with applicable New
York Stock York Stock Exchange rules. Exchange rules. (2 ) To approve the issuance in the Exchange
Offer of shares of First (5) To approve the issuance of shares of First BanCorps BanCorps Common
Stock in the Exchange Offer to Héctor M. Common Stock to The Bank of Nova Scotia in connection
Nevares-LaCosta, a member of the Board of Directors, in exchange for with the conversion into
Common Stock of Fixed Rate his shares of Preferred Stock, in accordance with applicable New York
Cumulative Mandatorily Convertable Preferred Stock, Stock Exchange rules. Series G, in accordance
with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules. (3 ) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of
First BanCorps Restated (6) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of First Articles of
Incorporation to decrease the par value of First BanCorps BanCorps Restated Articles of
Incoration to increase the Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10. number of authorized shares of the
Corporations Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000. (7) To approve an amendment to
Article Sixth of First BanCorps Restated Articles of Incoration to implement a reverse stock
split. Mark Here for Address Change or Comments SEE REVERSE NOTE: Please sign as name appears
hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee
or guardian, please give full title as such. Signature Signature Date |
You can now access your First BanCorp account online. Access your First BanCorp account online via
Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD). BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, the transfer agent for First
BanCorp, now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your stockholder account.
View account status View payment history for dividends View certificate history Make address
changes View book-entry information Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form Visit us on the web at
http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between
9am-7pm Monday-Friday Eastern Time Investor ServiceDirect® Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per
week TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163 Choose MLinkSM for fast, easy and secure 24/7
online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more.
Simply log on to Investor ServiceDirect® at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd where
step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment. Important notice regarding the
Internet availability of proxy materials for the Special Meeting of Stockholders. The Proxy
Statement, including exhibits, and the 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at:
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/fbp FOLD AND DETACH HERE PROXY FIRST BANCORP Special Meeting
of Stockholders August 24, 2010 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF FIRST
BANCORP The undersigned hereby appoints José Menéndez-Cortada and Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, and each
of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and
attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side,
all the shares of common stock of First BanCorp (the Corporation) that the undersigned is
entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come
before the Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation to be held August 24, 2010 or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present
at the Special Meeting. (Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) BNY
MELLON SHAREOWNER SERVICES Address Change/Comments P.O. BOX 3550 (Mark the corresponding box on the
reverse side) SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250 WO# 79513 |