e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended: September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 1-34033
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-1532464 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
11001 Bren Road East
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(952) 912-3444
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of the last
business day of the Registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $187,203,984
based on a closing price of $7.67 per common share as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
(formerly the NASDAQ National Market).
Shares of
common stock outstanding as of November 27, 2009: 24,700,896
INDEX
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following table shows, except as otherwise noted, the location of information required in this
Form 10-K, in our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended September 30, 2009 and Proxy
Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for January 25, 2010. All such
information set forth below under the heading Page/Reference is incorporated herein by reference,
or included in this Form 10-K on the pages indicated.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM IN FORM 10-K |
|
PAGE/REFERENCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors of the Registrant |
|
Election of Directors, Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act |
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code of Ethics |
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
Executive Compensation |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation; Executive Compensation; Compensation of Directors, Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
Security Ownership of Principal
Stockholders and Management; Equity Compensation Plan Information, Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence |
|
Election of Directors - Director Independence; Related Person Transaction Approval Policy, Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
|
Audit and Non-Audit Fees, Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules |
|
83 |
3
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements as that term
is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
The words believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, target, may, will, expect, plan,
project, should, or continue or the negative thereof or other expressions, which are
predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters,
identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on information available to us as
of the time of such statements and relate to, among other things, expectations of the business
environment in which we operate, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the
market and statements regarding our mission and vision. Forward-looking statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Our future operating results and performance trends may be affected by a number of factors,
including, without limitation, those described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of this Form 10-K. Those
risk factors, and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified from time to time in our
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, our quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q and our registration statements, could cause our actual future results to
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors
set forth in our various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and of changes in
general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and/or exchange rates and changes in the
assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The terms we, our or us mean Digi International Inc. and all of the subsidiaries included in
the consolidated financial statements unless the context indicates otherwise.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Digi International Inc. was formed in 1985 as a Minnesota corporation and reorganized as a Delaware
corporation in 1989 in conjunction with its initial public offering. Our common stock is traded on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol DGII. With our global headquarters in Minnetonka,
Minnesota, and regional sales offices throughout North America, Europe and Asia, our products are
available through approximately 262 distributors in more than 70 countries. We also have
engineering locations in North America, Europe and India.
Our first products (sold under the DigiBoard® brand) were box and board-level serial port adapters
that were used to directly connect multiple peripherals, such as standalone computer terminals, to
personal computers or a host computer system. During the 1990s, Ethernet became the connectivity
infrastructure for businesses and over time it has been extended into factories, retail stores,
restaurants, hospitals and many other environments. During the same period, the semiconductor
industry was also in a phase of rapid advancement. Complete systems were being built on a single
integrated circuit (chip). As part of a box or board level product, these chips could be used to
build a network interface for virtually any device for which network connectivity was required.
Recognizing the developing opportunities for device connectivity, we implemented a strategy in
early 2000 to leverage the brand strength that we had established with the DigiBoard product line
by organically
4
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
COMPANY OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
developing or acquiring next-generation connectivity products and technologies that would extend
the value of the Digi brand into an array of device networking applications.
During the course of the past several years, we have augmented our strategy with an increasing
emphasis on developing wireless device connectivity solutions. In fiscal 2007, we launched our
Drop-in Networking initiative which provides end-to-end wireless access to electronic devices in
places where wires will not work or cannot be used. Drop-in Networking enables our customers to
differentiate their products, provide better customer service and frequently create new revenue
streams. Our Drop-in Networking initiative provides opportunities for us in the next wave of
Internet growth. The initial wave was focused on connecting people, first with personal computers
and then with cell phones, PDAs and other related consumer devices. This next wave focuses on
connecting devices and machines. We believe that the Internet will support billions of new devices
in the next several years. We are ideally positioned to take full advantage of the second wave of
Internet growth with our Drop-in Networking Solutions that will provide significant market
expansion in what is now being referred to in the market as wireless machine to machine (M2M)
connectivity.
M2M communication works by connecting communication hardware to a physical asset so that
information about its status and performance can be sent to a computer system and used to automate
a business process or a human action so that a person does not have to do it manually.
Incorporating products from both our embedded and non-embedded categories, our Drop-In Networking
Solutions are making it easy for customers to effectively drop-in a wireless M2M solution.
In fiscal 2009, we expanded on Drop-in Networking and introduced our iDigi Solutions brand. The
iDigi Solution bundles software and services with our Drop-in Networking product offerings to make
M2M deployments even easier, faster, and more economical. At the heart of an iDigi Solution
bundle is the iDigi Platform, a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that quickly and easily connects
remote assets to a customers business applications. The iDigi Platform also includes a Control
Center application which enables easy provisioning, maintenance and management of the devices
themselves as well as the associated connectivity. The iDigi Platform runs on a grid of
Digi-managed servers. As an on-demand model, customers pay only for services consumed, conserving
capital and requiring minimal infrastructure to operate. iDigi Energy was launched as the first
iDigi Solution bundle and targets the Smart Grid efforts of energy services providers. iDigi
Tank was subsequently launched as an iDigi solution bundle optimized for remote tank monitoring of
storage tanks containing liquids, solids and gases.
We continue to leverage a common core technology base to develop and provide innovative
connectivity solutions to our customers. Core technology is used across product lines to provide
additional functionality for customers, allowing them to get to market with network-enabled devices
faster. We have positioned ourselves in the growing market of integrated hardware and software
connectivity solutions to network-enable the coming generation of intelligent devices in business
applications. Our Drop-in Networking and iDigi Solutions brand are enabling us to pivot our
business from point products to solutions. We have strategic goals for the next three to five
years to change our revenue mix to be 60% wireless, 60% international, and at least 10% services.
We believe we are making progress towards these goals by increasing our investment in wireless
products, expanding internationally, and providing full solutions which include product and
services offerings to our customers. Our wireless product net sales grew from $46.7 million, or
25.2% of total net sales in fiscal 2008, to $56.2 million, or 33.9% of total net sales in fiscal
2009, or an increase of 20.3%. International net sales were $75.2 million, or 45.3% of total net
sales in fiscal 2009, compared to $77.7 million, or 42.0% of net sales in fiscal 2008.
5
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
PRODUCTS
Our products are divided into two categories: embedded and non-embedded. An embedded product is
incorporated by a product developer into an electronic device (e.g., utilities meter, environmental
sensors, retail scanner, and medical instruments). It provides processing power and wired or
wireless network connectivity to that device. Additional hardware and/or software development is
required on the part of the customer when using an embedded product as the product usually is an
integrated internal part of the device.
A non-embedded product is connected externally to a device or larger system (e.g., retail checkout,
building access control panel, traffic controller) to provide network connectivity or port
expansion. Non-embedded products generally do not require additional hardware development and can
often be used right out of the box, although they do provide an environment for adding custom
software as well. These products provide an economical way to network-enable previously deployed
devices, allowing companies to utilize the latest technologies without the cost of replacing
existing equipment.
Embedded Networking Products
Modules Developing a device around a chip or microprocessor involves a high level of complexity.
A module is a group of components that are set up to work together, eliminating much of that
complexity. An embedded module may provide somewhat less flexibility than a chip, but is much
easier to implement into a product design. A number of these modules can be directly connected to
iDigi, enabling remote management and remote application connectivity.
Our modules can be divided into two categories: processor modules and communications modules.
Processor modules provide customers with a networked platform for use as the main processor in an
embedded system and the flexibility to add in custom features and functionality, as this ensures a
very quick time to market development cycle for a network-enabled device. These modules are
targeted as the core processors for products such as access control systems, Point-of-Sale (POS)
systems, Radio Frequency ID (RFID) readers, medical devices and instrumentation and networked
displays. Communication modules are ideal for network-enabling and web-enabling a device. They
enable customers who wish to easily accommodate both wired and wireless functionality in one
product design. These modules make it very easy to add most any type of connectivity, especially
wireless connectivity. Typically with a communication module, there is another processor
performing the central processing. Adding wired or wireless network communication to a device
allows companies to manage that device over a network or via the Internet.
Chips A chip (or microprocessor) provides the brains and processing power of an intelligent
electronic device or communication sub-system. Some of our higher volume customers choose to
purchase chips and build their own products. Chips are low cost but require the highest level of
development expertise. Building a solution from the chip level offers a low cost of the end design,
but the level of complexity in product development can increase risk and prolong time to market.
Our chips are the building blocks for many of our embedded and non-embedded products. By using our
own microprocessors we can ensure complete hardware/software compatibility for product designs. In
addition this allows us to guarantee long-term availability to our module customers. This is a
significant advantage since many of these products are expected to be in use for five to ten years
once they are developed.
Software and Development Tools Coupled with the chips and modules are a variety of development
tools and associated software to make application development easy. We provide software and tools
for a variety of operating environments and developer skill sets. These include Linux® and
Microsoft® Windows® Embedded CE as well as our own Net+OS and Python based iDigi Device
Integration Application (DIA).
6
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
Single Board Computers Single-board computers (SBCs) are complete systems on a single circuit
board. They are essentially a programmable box product without the enclosure everything is on
the board and ready to be embedded into a larger system. They offer the same benefits as the
processor modules, but eliminate the need for additional interface circuitry because they include
all of the key device interface components on one circuit board.
Network Interface Cards Our intelligent Network Interface Cards (NICs) are legacy products that
are used to provide Ethernet networking interfaces for printers. This function has been
increasingly taken over by the main processor.
Services Through our subsidiary, Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), we offer engineering
design services to customers that are challenged with their wireless development projects. Our
specialized engineers have extensive experience in wireless technologies such as Global System for
Mobile communication (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Global Positioning System (GPS),
Wi-Fi and proprietary radio frequency (RF) as well as Application Specific Integrated Circuit
(ASIC) design, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) integration, embedded software and complete
turn-key product development which allows them to address virtually any wireless development need.
Satellite Our acquisition of MobiApps added satellite communication products that provide
worldwide satellite data transmit/receive capabilities for customers involved in satellite-based
tracking and industrial remote communications. Operating over the ORBCOMM low-earth orbit
satellite network, these products can significantly improve asset utilization by allowing clients
to monitor, track and manage their fixed and mobile assets around the world.
Non-Embedded Networking Products
Cellular Routers Cellular routers provide connectivity for devices over a cellular data network.
They can be used as a cost effective alternative to landlines for primary or backup connectivity
for hard to reach sites and devices. We introduced the first intelligent high-speed cellular
router in 2005 to address the growing need for customers to connect remote sites and devices.
These products have been certified by the major wireless providers in North America and abroad,
including AT&T®, Verizon Wireless®, Sprint®, Bell Mobility and Rogers. All of our cellular
products include a unique remote management platform that provides secure management of devices
across remote networks. In addition, application connectivity, management and customization is
enabled via the iDigi platform for many of these products.
Gateways A gateway aggregates local wireless data traffic and transports it over a cellular or
other Internet Protocol (IP)-based network, usually back to a central application or database. Our
gateway products, part of our Drop-in Networking solution, enable devices or groups of devices to
be networked in locations where there is no existing network or where access to a network is
prohibited. These gateways can work in conjunction with our wireless adapters and wireless
embedded modules to enable customers to monitor and manage remote devices in a non-intrusive and
economical way. All of our gateway products are strongly linked with iDigi for secure management
of devices across remote networks, application connectivity and customization.
Wireless Communication Adapters Our wireless communication adapters are small box products that
utilize a variety of wireless protocols for PC-to-device or device-to-device connectivity, often in
locations where deploying a wired network is not possible either because of cost, disruption or
impracticality. By supporting ZigBee®, Wi-Fi® and proprietary RF technologies, we can meet most
customer application requirements, such as serial cable replacement, Ethernet cable replacement,
mesh networking, low cost/low power remote monitoring, simple I/O control functions, environmental
sensors and long distance connectivity. In conjunction
7
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
with one of our gateways, wireless communication adapters plug into iDigi for remote management,
application connectivity and customization.
Serial Servers Serial Servers (also known as device servers and terminal servers) add wired or
wireless network connectivity to a serial device. They transfer data between a serial port and an
Ethernet network, turning a previously isolated device with a serial port into a fully
collaborative network component. We believe that serial servers will remain an important product
category as Ethernet based serial connections continue to extend beyond their current applications
into many new markets such as building automation, healthcare, process control, and secure console
port management on servers, routers, switches and other network equipment. Many of our serial
servers can also leverage iDigi for application connectivity, remote management and customization.
Console Servers Console servers, or console management servers, provide access to the serial
ports of network equipment such as servers, routers or switches. Our intelligent console servers
enable customers to access, monitor or manage their network devices across multiple sites, both
remotely over the network or via their console ports even during network outages. These console
servers provide advanced auditing and logging capabilities that complement regulatory compliance
efforts such as Sarbanes-Oxley and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(HIPAA).
USB Connected Products The Universal Serial Bus (USB) is a plug-and-play interface between a
computer and peripheral devices. In recent years, many serial ports on PCs have been replaced with
USB ports, due in large part to the usability and cost effectiveness of USB devices. We have one
of the most comprehensive and advanced USB port expansion product lines in the industry. Our
USB-to-serial converters enable customers to expand a single USB port into multiple serial ports to
connect legacy peripheral devices. The product line also includes USB hubs that add additional USB
or powered USB ports, which are often used in retail environments, and a network-enabled hub that
connects USB devices over an IP network, which is an industry first.
Remote Display Products Our remote display connectivity solutions are designed for digital
advertising, digital menus, airport status displays, stadium scoreboards, or other applications
where visual content is to be displayed in public areas. These zero-clients connect display,
serial and USB devices over an IP-based network, without a dedicated PC or thin client. Removing
the PC or thin client in a digital display solution not only saves space but reduces costs and
increases security and reliability.
Cameras and Sensors Cameras and sensors are used in a wide variety of environmental monitoring
and building automation/security applications. Our cameras and sensors are supported by
application software that provides device status, data logging and alerts. These products also
play a role in our Drop-in Network portfolio of products. The cameras can be connected to our
cellular routers and gateways to provide video or still-frame images from select locations. The
sensors are standalone wireless or can also be connected to our wireless adapters to provide
environmental data from end-point nodes.
Serial Cards A serial card plugs into the expansion slot of a computer to provide serial ports
for device connectivity. We are a global leader in this category and offer one of the most
extensive serial card product families. Our products support a wide range of operating systems,
port densities, bus types, expansion options and applications. As Ethernet connections extend
beyond current applications, the serial card products are gradually transitioning to
network-attached and/or USB- attached devices. We have strengthened our product offering to meet
customer needs and fully support this mature product line while working to seamlessly transition
customers to newer technologies.
8
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
PRODUCTS (CONTINUED)
Network Management Applications- Network management applications provide a means of managing
devices on a network from remote locations. We offer network management applications that provide
enterprise class management and administration for many of our products, including gateways,
cellular routers, adapters and embedded communication modules. It enables customers to securely
manage, monitor, configure and control groups of devices remotely across a wired or wireless
IP-based network, including cellular networks, local area networks and the broader Internet. One
of the key benefits of these applications is the reduction of administrative maintenance costs,
which requires fewer trips to remote locations because the software can be used to diagnose and
solve problems. In addition, these applications also enable a web services based communication
connection to all devices, a key component of a Drop-in Networking solution. The applications are
now provided primarily through the iDigi Platform as part of the iDigi Control Center and iDigi
Solution offerings.
APPLICATION MARKETS
We believe we are a worldwide leader in commercial device connectivity, through network-enabling
devices in stores, factories, office buildings, banks, gas stations, oil rigs, hospitals, and many
other vertical environments.
Smart Energy - Our products simplify and accelerate the integration of energy management systems
with remote energy assets. These energy management systems are necessary for Smart Grid
initiatives encompassing both energy distribution and energy consumption management. Migrating to
IP-based network communications can be a challenge for utility companies, due to compatibility
issues between field equipment and the applications used with them. Our products enable companies
to network-enable existing products in the field without replacing hardware or rewriting existing
application software and are used in Automated Meter Reading (AMR), Automated Meter Intelligence
(AMI) and other smart energy applications.
Fleet Management Some of our newest products have extended our network connectivity expertise
into the areas of Fleet Management. Here we provide equipment and applications for connecting and
tracking commercial vehicles, primarily focused on long-haul trucking, but extending to other areas
of public and private fleets. Using a combination of cellular, satellite, Wi-Fi and XBee wireless
connectivity, these solutions provide improved operating efficiency and asset management.
Remote Device Management We provide hardware and software solutions that utilize remote cellular
networks like GSM, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)/Enhanced Data rate for Global Evolution
(EDGE) to manage, monitor and control assets in geographically distributed locations. The most
common remote device management application is associated with tank monitoring. In addition, this
often connects devices in harsh, volatile locations.
Building Automation/Security Our products help automate and control buildings heating,
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and security systems, and solve the problem of standalone
control systems that are unable to communicate with each other and share important data.
Medical/Healthcare We provide a way to network-enable medical equipment and devices to receive,
monitor and access patient information quickly, easily, and accurately, utilizing the hospitals
existing Ethernet or wireless network to improve patient care and reduce operating costs.
Traffic Management Our solutions make it easy to Ethernet-enable the field devices along
roadsides and at intersections so that a traffic management center has access to real-time
information. Some of the functions enabled by these solutions include traffic light coordination,
hazardous road condition alerts and variable message sign updates.
9
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
APPLICATION MARKETS (CONTINUED)
Industrial Automation We provide products to network-enable process and quality control
equipment, pump controllers, bar-code readers/scanners, scales and weighing stations, printers,
machine vision systems, programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and many other types of manufacturing
equipment. Connecting these devices over a network can help a manufacturing facility solve
problems associated with productivity, inventory management and quality control.
Retail/Point-of-Sale (POS) Our products solve the challenges associated with enabling POS devices
to effectively share information across the network. They can be used to easily connect network
devices like card swipe readers, bar-code scanners, scales, receipt printers and cash register
display poles.
Data Center Management Our out-of-band management solutions enable immediate response when a
network fails or in other critical situations, providing connectivity to servers and network
equipment when the primary network is down and eliminating costly travel to remote sites.
Digital Signage Our technology makes it easy to update content on scoreboards, billboards and
other electronic displays.
Government Most of our products and solutions are also used in government applications. In fact
many of the applications described can be found in both commercial and government sectors (e.g.
energy monitoring in a government building, a point-of-sale application on a ship, providing device
connectivity in a police car). With a dedicated U.S. government team, we also provide needs
assessment, technical assistance, and ongoing engineering support for government projects.
ACQUISITIONS
We have made several acquisitions in the past five fiscal years that are consistent with our
corporate strategy.
|
|
|
In April 2005, we acquired FS Forth-Systeme GmbH/Sistemas Embebidos S.A. (FS Forth),
leading providers of embedded modules based on our processors and NET+OS software, as well
as other microprocessors with supporting embedded software. The acquisition enhanced our
embedded module portfolio and also added expertise in a wide range of popular operating
systems including Linux and Microsoft Windows CE. Effective October 1, 2006, FS Forth
merged into Digi International GmbH. |
|
|
|
In May 2005, we acquired Rabbit Semiconductor® Inc. (formerly Z-World, Inc.). The
acquisition expanded our embedded portfolio to include the Rabbit line of microprocessors
and microprocessor-based core modules and Z-World single-board computers (now all sold
under the Rabbit brand). With bundled hardware and software, these products facilitate
quick time-to-market for device manufacturers who need to add network connectivity to
endpoint devices such as sensors, meters, vending machines, card readers, and scales.
Effective October 1, 2007, Rabbit Semiconductor® Inc. merged into Digi International Inc. |
|
|
|
In July 2006, we acquired MaxStream®, Inc. (MaxStream), a leader in the wireless device
networking market. MaxStream supplies device manufacturers and integrators with reliable
wireless modules and box products that are easy to use and allow customers to wirelessly
monitor and control electronic devices. Typical applications include automated utility
meter reading, oil and gas monitoring, remote control and monitoring of commercial heating
and air conditioning systems, vehicle information access for fleet management, industrial
controls, wireless sensors, and electronic signals. MaxStream was also a pioneer in the
field of ZigBee®/802.15.4 wireless communications. The MaxStream acquisition |
10
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
significantly expanded our wireless offering both with embedded modules and non-embedded
wireless communications adapters. The products also play a key role in our Drop-in
Networking initiative. Effective October 1, 2007, MaxStream merged into Digi International
Inc.
|
|
|
In April 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), a leader in the European
wireless router market. Sarian designs, develops and manufactures advanced
wireless/cellular IP-based routing equipment for mission critical applications. Sarian
developed its own comprehensive IP-based operating system and software and can offer
customers technical excellence, flexibility and rapid customization. Sarian has a strong
customer base in ATM connectivity, retail and payment systems connectivity, remote
monitoring telemetry, lottery terminal connectivity and wireless backup of wired broadband
connections. Effective October 1, 2009, Sarian merged into Digi International (UK) Ltd. |
|
|
|
In July 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), a leading design
services organization. Spectrum is a wholly owned subsidiary of Digi International Inc.
Spectrum focuses on solving a customers wireless development challenges. Spectrums
engineers have extensive experience in wireless technologies such as GSM, CDMA, GPS, Wi-Fi
and proprietary RF as well as ASIC design, FPGA integration, embedded software and complete
turn-key product development which allows them to address virtually any wireless
development need. |
|
|
|
In June 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private
Limited (MobiApps), a developer of machine-to-machine (M2M) communications technology
focusing on satellite, cellular and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps has
locations in India, Singapore and in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase
agreements, Digi International acquired the U.S. assets located in Herndon, Virginia. In
addition, we established Digi Wireless Singapore Pte. Ltd. and Digi m2m Solutions India
Private Limited, which acquired the assets of MobiApps affiliate companies, located in
Singapore and India, respectively. MobiApps provides a new generation of products based on
its own custom designed and patented mixed signal application specific integrated circuit
(ASIC), which dramatically reduces the complexity and improves performance of satellite M2M
system solutions. Satellite M2M applications include fleet management, marine vessel
tracking, container tracking, agricultural monitoring, energy management, and remote field
service applications. Satellite is especially suited to applications that cross country and
continental boundaries, providing connectivity in very remote locations, and providing
mission critical wireless backup solutions when cellular coverage is insufficient. MobiApps
also has cellular and hybrid cellular/satellite products packaged with various asset
tracking management services, including vehicle tracking, taxi dispatch and employee
tracking, focused on markets in India and Southeast Asia. |
Our products are sold under the Digi and Rabbit brands. We believe the Digi and Rabbit brands have
established strong identities with our targeted customer base and we believe our customers
associate the Digi brand with reliability and the Rabbit brand with ease of integration. Many
of our customers choose us because they are building a very complex system solution and they want
the highest level in product reliability. In the core module and semiconductor application
environments, ease of integration is a powerful brand identity.
DISTRIBUTION AND PARTNERSHIPS
We sell our products through a global network of distributors, systems integrators, value added
resellers (VARs) and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
11
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
DISTRIBUTION AND PARTNERSHIPS (CONTINUED)
Our larger distributors include Tech Data Corporation, Arrow Electronics, Inc., Ingram Micro,
Synnex, Future Electronics, NuHorizons, Miel and Atlantik Elektronik GmbH. We also maintain
relationships with many other distributors in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Asia and Latin America.
Additionally, we maintain strong relationships with catalog distributors CDW, Insight, Digi-Key and
Mouser Electronics.
We maintain strategic alliances with other industry leaders to develop and market technology
solutions. These include most major communications hardware and software vendors, operating system
suppliers, computer hardware manufacturers, cellular carriers and Smart Grid vendors. Key partners
include: Microsoft, VMware, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Dell, Toshiba, Atmel, Ember, Freescale,
Qualcomm, Wavecom, iTron, AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Bell Mobility, Rogers and several other cellular
carriers worldwide. Furthermore, we maintain a worldwide network of authorized developers that
extends our reach into certain other technology applications and geographical regions. With our
MobiApps acquisition, we are now partnering with ORBCOMM. MobiApps satellite communication
products utilize the ORBCOMM low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite network to monitor, track and manage
customers fixed and mobile assets around the world.
Our customer base includes many of the worlds largest companies. We have strategic sales
relationships with leading vendors, allowing them to ship our products and services as component
parts of their overall solutions. These vendors include IBM, Comverge, NCR, Sun Microsystems,
Fujitsu Services, Fujitsu Transaction Solutions, Nalco, TXU Energy and Hewlett Packard, among
others. Many of the worlds leading telecommunications companies and Internet service providers
also rely on our products, including Alcatel-Lucent, AT&T, Sprint, Verizon and Siemens.
No customer comprised more than 10% of our net sales for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008
and 2007.
We compete in the communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid technological
advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product
introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the
basis of existing and planned product features, service capabilities, company reputation, brand
recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product
development capabilities, price and availability. While we have no competitors that carry a
comparable range of products, we do have various competitors based on specific products.
We are a leader in device networking for business, developing reliable products and technologies to
connect and securely manage local or remote electronic devices over the network, via the Internet,
or via satellite. Our enterprise solutions include embedded or non-embedded products or
combinations of these products.
OPERATIONS
Our operations are conducted through a combination of internal manufacturing and external
subcontractors specializing in various parts of the manufacturing process. We rely on third party
foundries for our semiconductor devices (ASICs). This approach is beneficial because it allows us
to reduce our fixed costs, maintain production flexibility and optimize our profits.
Our products are manufactured to our designs with standard and semi-custom components. Most of
these components are available from multiple vendors. We have several single-sourced supplier
relationships, either because alternative sources are not available or because the relationship is
advantageous to us. If these suppliers are unable to provide a timely and reliable supply of
components, we could experience manufacturing delays that could adversely affect our consolidated
results of operations.
12
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
SEASONALITY
In general, our business is not considered to be highly seasonal, although our first fiscal quarter
revenue is often less than other quarters due to holidays and fewer shipping days.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
During fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, our research and development expenditures were $26.4
million, $27.1 million and $24.2 million, respectively. Due to rapidly changing technology in the
communications technology industry, we believe that our success depends primarily upon the product
development skills of our personnel, and the ability to integrate acquired technologies with
organically developed technologies. We have incurred in-process research and development charges
in connection with our past acquisitions, which were expensed upon consummation of the
acquisitions. Effective October 1, 2009 in-process research and development costs will be
capitalized according to new authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to business
combinations. Acquired in-process research and development charges are disclosed separately and
are incremental to the research and development expenditures disclosed above. Our proprietary
rights and technology are protected by a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and
patents. We have established common law and registered trademark rights on a family of marks for a
number of our products.
BACKLOG
As of September 30, 2009, we had backlog orders in the amount of $13.6 million. Most of these
orders are expected to be shipped in fiscal 2010. Backlog as of September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$29.2 million and $14.1 million, respectively. Our backlog decrease as of September 30, 2009 as
compared to September 30, 2008 is partially due to a non-cancellable purchase order for $8.0
million received from a Sarian customer that was included in the September 30, 2008 backlog.
Backlog as of any particular date is not necessarily indicative of our future sales trends.
EMPLOYEES
We had 634 employees on September 30, 2009 compared to 663 employees on September 30, 2008. We
acquired 62 employees as a result of the MobiApps acquisition offset by a workforce reduction of 86
employees as a result of a business restructuring announced on April 23, 2009.
13
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
As of the date of filing this Form 10-K, the following individuals were executive officers of the
Registrant:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
51 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Subramanian Krishnan |
|
55 |
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence A. Kraft |
|
43 |
|
Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
Joel K. Young |
|
45 |
|
Senior Vice President of Research and Development and Chief Technical Officer |
Mr. Dunsmore joined our company in October 1999 as President and Chief Executive Officer and a
member of the Board of Directors and was elected Chairman of the Board in May 2000. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Dunsmore was Vice President of Access for Lucent Microelectronics, a
telecommunications company now known as Agere Systems Inc., since June 1999. From October 1998 to
June 1999, he acted as an independent consultant to various high technology companies. From
February 1998 to October 1998, Mr. Dunsmore was Chief Executive Officer of NetFax, Inc., a
telecommunications company. From October 1995 to February 1998, he held executive management
positions at US Robotics and then at 3COM after 3COM acquired US Robotics in June 1997. Prior to
that, Mr. Dunsmore held various marketing management positions at AT&T Paradyne Corporation from
May 1983 to October 1995. Mr. Dunsmore is also a director of Analysts International Corporation.
Mr. Krishnan was named Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on February 1,
1999, prior to which he served as our Vice President of Finance since January 11, 1999. Prior to
joining us, he served as a principal with LAWCO Financial, an investment banking firm in
Minneapolis, Minnesota from January 1997 to January 1999. Prior to LAWCO, he served for 13 years
with the Valspar Corporation as the Director of Corporate Financial Planning and Reporting and
Taxes and was primarily responsible for mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures.
Mr. Kraft joined our company as Vice President of Americas Sales and Marketing in February 2003 and
was named Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing in November 2005. Prior to joining us, Mr.
Kraft was Vice President of Marketing for Advanced Switching Communications (ASC), a provider of
broadband access platforms, from June 1999 to February 2002. From July 1998 to October 1998, Mr.
Kraft was Vice President of Marketing for NetFax, Inc., a telecommunications company. Mr. Kraft
also previously held the positions of Manager of Product Marketing at 3COM/U.S. Robotics, Vice
President of Marketing for ISDN Systems Corporation, and Group Products Manager for the Internet
access program at Sprint Corporation.
Mr. Young joined our company in July 2000 as Vice President of Engineering and was named Vice
President of Research and Development and Chief Technical Officer in November 2005. In October
2006, Mr. Young was named Senior Vice President of Research and Development and Chief Technical
Officer. Prior to joining us, Mr. Young served as a Vice President for Transcrypt International, a
provider of encryption products, in various engineering, sales and marketing positions from
February 1996 to June 2000. Before that, he held various engineering and management positions at
AT&T and AT&T Bell Laboratories from 1986 to 1996.
14
ITEM 1. BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Our customers are located throughout North America, Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA), Asia and
Latin America. We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions
being denominated in Euros, British Pounds and Japanese Yen and foreign currency translation risk
as the financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into
U.S. Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a hedging strategy to reduce foreign
currency risk.
During 2009, we had approximately $75.2 million of net sales related to foreign customers including
export sales, of which $33.4 million was denominated in foreign currency, predominately the Euro
and British Pound. During 2008 and 2007, we had approximately $76.1 million and $61.2 million,
respectively, of net sales to foreign customers including export sales, of which $45.7 million and
$30.1 million, respectively, were denominated in foreign currency, predominately the Euro. In
future periods, a significant portion of sales will continue to be made in Euros and British
Pounds. Financial information about geographic areas appears in Note 4 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements in this Form 10-K.
DIGI INTERNATIONAL WEBSITE
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Proxy Statements, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current
Reports on Form 8-K filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 are available through our website (www.digi.com) under the About us -
Investor Relations caption or by writing to us. This information is available free of charge as
soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. These reports can also be accessed via the SEC website, www.sec.gov,
or via the SECs Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Information concerning the operation of the SECs Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
We are not including the information on our website as part of, or incorporating it by reference
into, our Form 10-K.
15
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Multiple risk factors exist which could have a material effect on our operations, results of
operations, profitability, financial position, liquidity, capital resources and common stock.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our dependence on new product development and the rapid technological change that characterizes our
industry makes us susceptible to loss of market share resulting from competitors product
introductions and similar risks.
The communications technology industry is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving
industry standards, frequent new product introductions, short product life cycles and rapidly
changing customer requirements. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the
emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. Our
future success will depend on our ability to enhance our existing products, to introduce new
products to meet changing customer requirements and emerging technologies, and to demonstrate the
performance advantages and cost-effectiveness of our products over competing products. Failure by
us to modify our products to support new alternative technologies or failure to achieve widespread
customer acceptance of such modified products could cause us to lose market share and cause our
revenues to decline.
We may experience delays in developing and marketing product enhancements or new products that
respond to technological change, evolving industry standards and changing customer requirements.
There can be no assurance that we will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the
successful development, introduction, and marketing of these products or product enhancements, or
that our new products and product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the
marketplace and achieve any significant or sustainable degree of market acceptance in existing or
additional markets. In addition, the future introductions or announcements of products by us or
one of our competitors embodying new technologies or changes in industry standards or customer
requirements could render our then-existing products obsolete or unmarketable. There can be no
assurance that the introduction or announcement of new product offerings by us or one or more of
our competitors will not cause customers to defer their purchase of our existing products, which
could cause our revenues to decline.
We intend to continue to devote significant resources to our research and development, which, if
not successful, could cause a decline in our revenues and harm our business.
We intend to continue to devote significant resources to research and development in the coming
years to enhance and develop additional products. For the fiscal years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007,
our research and development expenses comprised 15.9%, 14.6% and 14.0%, respectively, of our net
sales. If we are unable to develop new products as a result of our research and development
efforts, or if the products we develop are not successful, our business could be harmed. Even if
we develop new products that are accepted by our target markets, the net revenues from these
products may not be sufficient to justify our investment in research and development.
Many of our products have been developed through a combination of internally developed technologies
and acquired technologies. Our ability to continue to develop new products is partially dependent
on finding and acquiring new technologies in the marketplace. Even if we identify new technologies
that we believe would be complementary to our internally developed technologies, we may not be
successful in acquiring those technologies or we may not be able to acquire the technologies at a
price that is acceptable to us.
A substantial portion of our recent development efforts have been directed toward the development
of new products targeted to manufacturers of intelligent, network-enabled devices and other
embedded systems in various markets, including markets in which networking solutions for embedded
systems have not historically
16
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
been sold, such as markets for industrial automation equipment, security equipment and medical
equipment. Our financial performance is dependent upon the development of the intelligent device
markets that we are targeting, the increasing adoption of wireless technologies by these markets
and our ability to successfully compete and sell our products to manufacturers of these intelligent
devices.
Certain of our products are sold into mature markets, which could limit our ability to continue to
generate revenue from these products.
Certain of our products provide asynchronous and synchronous data transmissions via add-on cards.
The market for add-on asynchronous and synchronous data communications cards is mature.
Furthermore, certain applications of our embedded network interface cards are also considered
mature. As the overall market for these products decreases due to the adoption of new
technologies, we expect that our revenues from these products will continue to decline. As a
result, our future prospects depend in large part on our ability to acquire or develop and
successfully market additional products that address growth markets.
Our failure to effectively manage product transitions could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues and profitability.
From time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products, capabilities, or technologies
that may replace or shorten the life cycles of our existing products. Announcements of currently
planned or other new products may cause customers to defer or stop purchasing our products until
new products become available. Furthermore, the introduction of new or enhanced products requires
us to manage the transition from older product inventories and ensure that adequate supplies of new
products can be delivered to meet customer demand. Our failure to effectively manage transitions
from older products could result in inventory obsolescence and have a material adverse effect on
our revenues and profitability.
Our failure to compete successfully in our highly competitive market could result in reduced prices
and loss of market share.
The market in which we operate is characterized by rapid technological advances and evolving
industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product introductions and
marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the basis of existing
and planned product features, company reputation, brand recognition, technical support,
relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product development capabilities, price, and
availability. Certain of our competitors and potential competitors may have greater financial,
technological, manufacturing, marketing, and personnel resources than us. Present and future
competitors may be able to identify new markets and develop products more quickly, which are
superior to those developed by us. They may also adapt new technologies faster, devote greater
resources to research and development, promote products more aggressively, and price products more
competitively than us. There are no assurances that competition will not intensify or that we will
be able to compete effectively in the markets in which we compete.
Our inability to obtain the appropriate telecommunications or satellite carrier certifications or
approvals from other governmental regulatory bodies could impede our ability to grow revenues in
our wireless products.
The sale of our wireless products in certain geographical markets is sometimes dependent on the
ability to gain telecommunications or satellite carrier certifications and/or approvals by certain
governmental bodies. Failure to obtain these approvals, or delays in receiving the approvals,
could impact our ability to enter our targeted markets or to compete effectively or at all in these
markets and could have an adverse impact on our revenues.
17
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
We are dependent on wireless communication networks owned and controlled by others.
Our revenues could decline if we are unable to deliver continued access to satellite and digital
cellular wireless carriers that we depend on to provide sufficient network capacity, reliability
and security to our customers. Our financial condition could be impacted if our wireless carriers
were to increase the prices of their services, or to suffer operational or technical failures.
The cyclicality of the semiconductor industry may result in substantial period-to-period
fluctuations in operating results.
Our semiconductor products provide networking capabilities for intelligent, network-enabled devices
and other embedded systems. The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and subject to rapid
technological change and has been subject to significant economic downturns at various times,
characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices and
production overcapacity. The semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand
and production capacity constraints. As a result, we may experience substantial period-to-period
fluctuations in operating results due to general semiconductor industry conditions.
Loss of one or more of our large customers could have an adverse effect on our revenues.
Our sales are primarily made on the basis of purchase orders rather than under long-term
agreements, and therefore, any customer could cease purchasing our products at any time without
penalty. The decision of any large customer, including our distributors, to cease using our
products or a material decline in the number of units purchased by such a customer could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues.
The long and variable sales cycle for certain of our products makes it more difficult for us to
predict our operating results and manage our business.
The sale of our products typically involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of
capital and other resources by potential customers and end users, as well as delays frequently
associated with end users internal procedures to deploy new technologies within their products and
to test and accept new technologies. For these and other reasons, the sales cycle associated with
certain of our products is typically lengthy and is subject to a number of significant risks,
including end users internal purchasing reviews, that are beyond our control. Because of the
lengthy sales cycle and the large size of certain customer orders, if orders forecasted for a
specific customer are not realized or delayed, our operating results could be materially adversely
affected.
We depend on manufacturing relationships and on limited-source suppliers, and any disruptions in
these relationships may cause damage to our customer relationships.
We procure all parts and certain services involved in the production of our products and
subcontract most of our product manufacturing to outside firms that specialize in such services.
Although most of the components of our products are available from multiple vendors, we have
several single-source supplier relationships, either because alternative sources are not available
or because the relationship is advantageous to us. There can be no assurance that our suppliers
will be able to meet our future requirements for products and components in a timely fashion. In
addition, the availability of many of these components to us is dependent in part on our ability to
provide our suppliers with accurate forecasts of our future requirements. Delays or lost sales
could be caused by other factors beyond our control, including late deliveries by vendors of
components. If we are required to identify alternative suppliers for any of our required
components, qualification and pre-production periods could be lengthy and may cause an increase in
component costs and delays in providing products to customers. Any extended interruption in the
supply of any of the key components currently obtained from
18
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
limited sources could disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our customer
relationships and profitability.
Our use of suppliers in Southeast Asia involves risks that could negatively impact us.
We purchase printed circuit boards from suppliers in Southeast Asia. Product delivery times may be
extended due to the distances involved, requiring more lead time in ordering. In addition, ocean
freight delays may occur as a result of labor problems, weather delays or expediting and customs
issues. Any extended delay in receipt of the component parts could eliminate anticipated cost
savings and have a material adverse effect on our customer relationships and profitability.
Our ability to compete could be jeopardized if we are unable to protect our intellectual property
rights.
Our ability to compete depends in part on our proprietary rights and technology. Our proprietary
rights and technology are protected by a combination of copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and
patents.
We enter into confidentiality agreements with all employees, and sometimes with our customers and
potential customers, and limit access to the distribution of our proprietary information. There
can be no assurance that the steps taken by us in this regard will be adequate to prevent the
misappropriation of our technology. Our pending patent applications may be denied and any patents,
once issued, may be circumvented by our competitors. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that
others will not develop technologies that are superior to our technologies. Despite our efforts to
protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or
to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States.
There can be no assurance that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States
or abroad will be adequate or that competing companies will not independently develop similar
technology. Our failure to adequately protect our proprietary rights could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position and result in loss of revenue.
From time to time, we are subject to claims and litigation regarding intellectual property rights
or other claims, which could seriously harm us and require us to incur significant costs.
The communications technology industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and
other intellectual property rights. From time to time, we receive notification of a third-party
claim that our products infringe other intellectual property rights. Any litigation to determine
the validity of third-party infringement claims, whether or not determined in our favor or settled
by us, may be costly and divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel
from productive tasks, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our
business and service the needs of our customers. There can be no assurance that any infringement
claims by third parties, if proven to have merit, will not materially adversely affect our business
or financial condition. In the event of an adverse ruling in any such matter, we may be required
to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, discontinue
the use of certain processes or be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property
rights of the third party claiming infringement. There can be no assurance that a license would be
available on reasonable terms or at all. Any limitations on our ability to market our products, or
delays and costs associated with redesigning our products or payments of license fees to third
parties, or any failure by us to develop or license a substitute technology on commercially
reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
19
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
We face risks associated with our international operations and expansion that could impair our
ability to grow our revenues abroad.
We believe that our future growth is dependent in part upon our ability to increase sales in
international markets. These sales are subject to a variety of risks, including fluctuations in
currency exchange rates, tariffs, import restrictions and other trade barriers, unexpected changes
in regulatory requirements, longer accounts receivable payment cycles, potentially adverse tax
consequences, and export license requirements. In addition, we are subject to the risks inherent
in conducting business internationally, including political and economic instability and unexpected
changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. There can be no assurance that one or more of these
factors will not have a material adverse effect on our business strategy and financial condition.
The loss of key personnel could prevent us from executing our business strategy.
Our business and prospects depend to a significant degree upon the continuing contributions of our
executive officers and our key technical personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and
there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining qualified
personnel. Failure to attract and retain key personnel could result in our failure to execute our
business strategy.
Unanticipated changes in our tax rates could affect our future results.
Our future effective tax rates could be favorably or unfavorably affected by unanticipated changes
in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of
our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or our interpretation of such
laws. In addition, we may be subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the Internal
Revenue Service and other U.S. and international tax authorities. We regularly assess the
potential outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these examinations will not have an
effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Any acquisitions we have made or will make could disrupt our business and seriously harm our
financial condition.
We will continue to consider acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies.
In the event of any future purchases, we could issue stock that would dilute our current
stockholders percentage ownership, incur debt, assume liabilities, or incur large and immediate
write-offs.
Our operation of any acquired business may also involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
problems combining the purchased operations, technologies, or products;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated costs; |
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from our core business;
|
|
|
|
difficulties integrating businesses in different countries and cultures; |
|
|
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and |
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the purchased organization. |
We cannot assure that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products,
technologies, or personnel that we have acquired or that we might acquire in the future and any
failure to do so could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, from time to time, we may enter into
negotiations for a proposed acquisition, but be unable or unwilling to consummate the acquisition
under consideration. This could cause significant diversion of managements attention and
out-of-pocket expenses for us. We could also be exposed to litigation as a result of
20
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
an unconsummated acquisition, including claims that we failed to negotiate in good faith or
misappropriated confidential information.
Our failure to effectively comply with the requirements of applicable environmental legislation and
regulation could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Production and marketing of products in certain states and countries may subject us to
environmental and other regulations. In addition, certain states and countries may pass new
regulations requiring our products to meet certain requirements to use environmentally friendly
components. The European Union has issued two directives relating to chemical substances in
electronic products. The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE) makes
producers of certain electrical and electronic equipment financially responsible for collection,
reuse, recycling, treatment and disposal of equipment placed in the European Union market after
August 13, 2005. The Restrictions of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS) bans the use of certain
hazardous materials in electric and electrical equipment which are put on the market in the
European Union after July 1, 2006. In the future, China and other countries including the United
States are expected to adopt further environmental compliance programs. If we fail to comply with
these regulations, we may not be able to sell our products in jurisdictions where these regulations
apply, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Negative conditions in the global credit markets may impair a portion of our investment portfolio.
Our investment portfolio consists of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government bonds.
These marketable securities are classified at September 30, 2009 as available-for-sale and are
carried at fair market value. Some of our investments could experience reduced liquidity,
resulting in an adjustment and could result in an impairment charge should the impairment be
considered as other-than-temporary. This loss would be recorded in our consolidated statement of
operations, which could materially adversely impact our consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
Our consolidated operating results and financial condition may be adversely impacted by worldwide
economic conditions and credit tightening.
Worldwide economic conditions have experienced a significant downturn due to the credit conditions
impacted by the subprime mortgage crisis and other factors, including slower economic activity,
inflation and deflation concerns, increased energy costs, decreased consumer confidence, reduced
corporate profits, reduced or canceled capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity
concerns. These conditions may make it difficult or impossible for our customers and suppliers to
accurately forecast and plan future business activities, which may cause them to slow or suspend
spending on products and services. As our customers face this challenging economic time, they may
find it difficult to gain sufficient credit in a timely manner, which could result in an impairment
of their ability to place orders with us or to make timely payments to us for previous purchases.
If this occurs, our revenue may be reduced, thereby having a negative impact on our results of
operations. In addition, we may be forced to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts and our
days sales outstanding may increase, which would have a negative impact on our cash position,
liquidity and financial condition. We cannot predict the timing or the duration of this or any
other economic downturn in the economy.
21
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
Our consolidated operating results may be adversely impacted if economic conditions impact the
financial viability of our customers, distributors, or suppliers.
We have standard payment terms for our customers and sometimes special payment terms may be
pre-authorized by our credit department. While we have procedures to monitor and limit exposure to
credit risk on our receivables, there can be no assurance such procedures will effectively limit
our credit risk and avoid losses. If economic conditions do not improve, certain of our customers
may face liquidity concerns and may be unable to timely satisfy their payment obligations to us,
which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and results of
operations.
We may have additional tax liabilities.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions. Significant
judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes, including our
reserves for uncertain tax positions. In the ordinary course of business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We regularly are
under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final
determination of tax audits could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions
and accruals. The results of an audit could have a material effect on our financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
If our stock price declines, we may need to recognize an impairment of our goodwill.
The current global economic crisis has impacted the stock prices of many companies. If the price
of our common stock is impacted, we could have an impairment of our goodwill. Our value is
dependent upon continued future growth in demand for our products. If such growth does not
materialize or our forecasts are significantly reduced, we may impair our goodwill. We performed
our annual goodwill impairment assessment as of June 30, 2009, on our one reporting unit. Based on
our analysis, we concluded that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount
and therefore goodwill was not considered impaired. To the extent additional information arises or
our strategies change, it is possible that our conclusion regarding goodwill impairment could
change, which could have a material effect on our consolidated financial position and results of
operations. At September 30, 2009, our market capitalization, which is an indicator of fair value,
was below the carrying value of our reporting unit due to a decline in our stock price during the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. However, an estimated control premium was also used in our
determination of fair value. The control premium represents the amount an investor would pay, over
and above market capitalization, in order to obtain a controlling interest in a company.
Therefore, the fair value of our reporting unit was measured using our market capitalization as of
September 30, 2009, plus a control premium of 35%. The estimated control premium was determined by
a review of premiums paid for similar companies over the past five years. The control premium used
in our determination of fair value is subject to management judgment, including the interpretation
of current economic indicators and market valuations as well as our strategic plans with regard to
our operations.
22
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
The price of our common stock has been volatile and could continue to fluctuate in the future.
The market price of our common stock, like that of many other high-technology companies, has
fluctuated significantly and is likely to continue to fluctuate in the future. During fiscal year
2009, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market ranged from $6.55 to
$10.83 per share. Our closing sale price on November 27, 2009 was $7.62 per share. Announcements
by us or others regarding the receipt of customer orders, quarterly variations in operating
results, acquisitions or divestitures, additional equity or debt financings, results of customer
field trials, scientific discoveries, technological innovations, litigation, product developments,
patent or proprietary rights, government regulation and general market conditions may have a
significant impact on the market price of our common stock.
Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter documents have an
anti-takeover effect.
There exist certain mechanisms under the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter documents
that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control. For instance, under Delaware law, we are
prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with interested stockholders for a period
of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder unless certain requirements are met, and majority stockholder approval is required for
certain business combination transactions with interested parties. Our Certificate of
Incorporation contains a fair price provision requiring majority stockholder approval for certain
business combination transactions with interested parties, and this provision may not be changed
without the vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of our voting stock. Other mechanisms
in our charter documents may also delay, defer or prevent a change of control. For instance, our
Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors has authority to issue series of
our preferred stock with such voting rights and other powers as the Board of Directors may
determine. Furthermore, we have a classified board of directors, which means that our directors
are divided into three classes that are elected to three-year terms on a staggered basis. Since
the three-year terms of each class overlap the terms of the other classes of directors, the entire
board of directors cannot be replaced in any one year. Under Delaware law, directors serving on a
classified board may not be removed by shareholders except for cause. Pursuant to the terms of our
shareholder rights plan, each outstanding share of common stock has one attached right. The rights
will cause substantial dilution of the ownership of a person or group that attempts to acquire us
on terms not approved by the Board of Directors and may have the effect of deterring hostile
takeover attempts. The effect of these anti-takeover provisions may be to deter business
combination transactions not approved by our Board of Directors, including acquisitions that may
offer a premium over the market price to some or all stockholders.
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so.
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying
any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
23
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table contains a listing of our current property locations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership or |
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
Lease |
Location of |
|
|
|
Square |
|
Expiration |
Property |
|
Use of Facility |
|
Footage |
|
Date |
|
Minnetonka, MN
(Corporate headquarters)
|
|
Research & development, sales, sales support,
marketing and administration
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eden Prairie, MN
|
|
Manufacturing and warehousing
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
Engineering services
|
|
|
16,837 |
|
|
November 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waltham, MA
|
|
Research & development, sales and sales support
|
|
|
13,424 |
|
|
September 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing
and administration
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
March 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davis, CA
|
|
Sales, sales support, research & development
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
December 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindon, UT
|
|
Sales, marketing, research & development
and administration
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Herndon, VA
|
|
Sales, marketing and tech support
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
October 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hong Kong, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
July 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beijing, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
November 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
June 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dortmund, Germany
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing and
administration
|
|
|
21,485 |
|
|
March 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Breisach, Germany
|
|
Sales, marketing, research & development,
manufacturing,
warehousing and administration
|
|
|
8,748 |
|
|
December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neuilly sur Seine, France
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
|
January 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ilkley, UK
|
|
Sales, sales support, marketing and administration
|
|
|
5,475 |
|
|
September 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logrono, Spain
|
|
Sales, research & development and administration
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
January 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
November 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bangalore, India
|
|
Sales, research & development and administration
|
|
|
9,189 |
|
|
July 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore
|
|
Sales, marketing and administration
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
June 2011 |
In addition to the above locations, we perform research and development activities in various other
locations in the United States and sales activities in various other locations in Europe and China
which are not deemed to be principal locations and which are not listed above. We believe that our
facilities are adequate for our needs. In February 2008, we sold our facility in Dortmund, Germany
and leased back approximately 40% of the property for a period of five years, with a renewal option
for an additional five years.
24
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the initial
public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other public
companies. We acquired Net Silicon, Inc. on February 13, 2002. The complaint names us as a
defendant along with NetSilicon, certain of its officers and certain underwriters involved in
NetSilicons IPO, among numerous others, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO
prospectus and registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained
material misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters
in allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the
claims against the NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation
vigorously. Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed
from the lawsuit, without prejudice, on October 9, 2002.
In June 2003, we elected to participate in a proposed settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in
this litigation. Had it been approved by the Court, this proposed settlement would have resulted
in a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims in the litigation against us and against any of the
other issuer defendants who elected to participate in the proposed settlement, together with the
current or former officers and directors of participating issuers who were named as individual
defendants. This proposed issuer settlement was conditioned on, among other things, a ruling by
the District Court that the claims against NetSilicon and against the other issuers who had agreed
to the settlement would be certified for class action treatment for purposes of the proposed
settlement, such that all investors included in the proposed classes in these cases would be bound
by the terms of the settlement unless an investor opted to be excluded from the settlement in a
timely and appropriate fashion.
On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in In
re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation that six purported class action lawsuits
containing allegations substantially similar to those asserted against us could not be certified as
class actions due, in part, to the Court of Appeals determination that individual issues of
reliance and knowledge would predominate over issues common to the proposed classes. On January 8,
2007, the plaintiffs filed a petition seeking rehearing en banc of this ruling. On
April 6, 2007 the Court of Appeals denied the plaintiffs petition for rehearing of the Courts
December 5, 2006 ruling. The Court of Appeals, however, noted that the plaintiffs remained free to
ask the District Court to certify classes different from the ones originally proposed which might
meet the standards for class certification that the Court of Appeals articulated in its December 5,
2006 decision. The plaintiffs have since moved for certification of different classes in the
District Court, and that motion remains pending. In light of the Court of Appeals December 5,
2006 decision regarding certification of the plaintiffs claims, the District Court entered an
order on June 25, 2007 terminating the proposed settlement between the plaintiffs and the issuers,
including NetSilicon.
On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed amended complaints in six focus cases. On November 13,
2007, the issuer defendants and the underwriter defendants separately moved to dismiss the claims
against them in the amended complaints in the six focus cases. On March 26, 2008, the District
Court issued an order in which it denied in substantial part the motions to dismiss the amended
complaints in the six focus cases.
On February 25, 2009, the parties advised the District Court that they had reached an
agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation in its entirety. A stipulation of settlement was
filed with the District Court on April 2, 2009. On June 9, 2009, the District Court preliminarily
approved the proposed global settlement. Notice was provided to the class, and a settlement
fairness hearing, at which members of the class had an opportunity to object to the proposed
settlement, was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued an order
granting final approval to the settlement. Several objectors have since appealed the order
approving the settlement, and those appeals remain pending.
25
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED)
Under the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us,
and we would bear no financial liability beyond our insured basis. While there can be no guarantee
as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our liability insurance will be
adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the applicable deductible amount of
$250,000 per claim. As of September 30, 2009, we have an accrued liability for the anticipated
settlement of $300,000 which we believe reflects the amount of loss that is probable. We have
recorded a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000 which represents the anticipated
settlement of $300,000 less a $250,000 deductible. In the event we should have losses that exceed
the limits of the liability insurance, such losses could have a material adverse effect on our
business and our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In addition to the matter discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims. Our
management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to the vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
26
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Stock Listing
Our Common Stock trades under the symbol DGII. Since July 3, 2006 our Common Stock has traded on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market tier of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and prior to that time was
traded on the NASDAQ National Market tier. On November 27, 2009, the number of holders of our
Common Stock was approximately 8,632, consisting of 191 record
holders and approximately 8,441
stockholders whose stock is held by a bank, broker or other nominee.
High and low sale prices for each quarter during the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, as
reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, were as follows:
Stock Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
High |
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
$ |
8.98 |
|
|
$ |
10.72 |
|
|
$ |
10.87 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
6.40 |
|
|
$ |
8.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
High |
|
$ |
17.30 |
|
|
$ |
14.46 |
|
|
$ |
12.82 |
|
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
10.20 |
|
|
$ |
7.64 |
|
|
$ |
7.67 |
|
Dividend Policy
We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. Our Board of Directors presently intends to
retain all earnings for use in our business, except for periodic stock repurchases, and does not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We do not have a Dividend Reinvestment Plan or a Direct Stock Purchase Plan.
Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. Of the 1,500,000 shares authorized to be repurchased, 135,638 shares remain
available for repurchase at September 30, 2009.
27
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES (CONTINUED) |
Performance Evaluation
The graph below compares the total cumulative stockholders return on our Common Stock for the
period from the close of the Nasdaq Stock Market U.S. Companies on September 30, 2004 to
September 30, 2009, the last day of fiscal 2009, with the total cumulative return on the CRSP Total
Return Index for the Nasdaq Stock Market U.S. Companies (the CRSP Index) and the CRSP Index for
Nasdaq Telecommunications Stocks (the Peer Index) over the same period. We have determined that
our line of business is mostly comparable to those companies in the Peer Index. The index level
for the graph and table was set to $100 on September 30, 2004, for our Common Stock, the CRSP Index
and the Peer Index and assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.
COMPARISON
OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL
RETURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY04 |
|
|
FY05 |
|
|
FY06 |
|
|
FY07 |
|
|
FY08 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Digi International Inc. |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
93.88 |
|
|
|
|
118.11 |
|
|
|
|
124.58 |
|
|
|
|
89.24 |
|
|
|
|
74.54 |
|
|
|
CRSP Index |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
114.14 |
|
|
|
|
120.35 |
|
|
|
|
142.45 |
|
|
|
|
112.31 |
|
|
|
|
90.13 |
|
|
|
Peer Index |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
122.08 |
|
|
|
|
136.19 |
|
|
|
|
159.67 |
|
|
|
|
110.74 |
|
|
|
|
110.48 |
|
|
|
28
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands except per common share amounts and number of employees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30 |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales (1) |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
|
$ |
144,663 |
|
|
$ |
125,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
81,265 |
|
|
$ |
97,869 |
|
|
$ |
91,346 |
|
|
$ |
77,505 |
|
|
$ |
71,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
33,499 |
|
|
|
28,591 |
|
|
|
26,339 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
24,176 |
|
|
|
20,861 |
|
|
|
16,531 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
12,830 |
|
|
|
11,364 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (2) |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
20,328 |
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
|
|
16,957 |
|
Total other income, net (3) |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
|
|
15,267 |
|
|
|
17,983 |
|
Income tax provision (4) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
4,154 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
$ |
11,113 |
|
|
$ |
17,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share, basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data as of September 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (total current assets less
total current liabilities) |
|
$ |
106,121 |
|
|
$ |
112,236 |
|
|
$ |
115,703 |
|
|
$ |
83,341 |
|
|
$ |
69,995 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
$ |
271,416 |
|
|
$ |
251,826 |
|
|
$ |
225,321 |
|
|
$ |
177,631 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
$ |
229,586 |
|
|
$ |
231,934 |
|
|
$ |
222,905 |
|
|
$ |
193,830 |
|
|
$ |
153,537 |
|
Book value per common share (stockholders equity
divided by outstanding shares) |
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
|
$ |
9.14 |
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
$ |
7.74 |
|
|
$ |
6.78 |
|
Number of employees as of September 30 |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Acquisitions provided the following net sales during the year of acquisition: MobiApps in
fiscal 2009 of $0.4 million, Sarian and
Spectrum in fiscal 2008 of $6.5 million, MaxStream in fiscal 2006 of $3.2 million, Rabbit and FS
Forth of $13.3 million in fiscal 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to
share-based payments and began using
the modified prospective method of application. Total compensation cost for stock-based payment
arrangements totaled $3.5 million
($2.4 million after tax) during fiscal 2009, $3.7 million ($2.5 million after tax) during fiscal
2008, $3.0 million ($2.0 million after tax)
during fiscal 2007, and $2.3 million ($1.5 million after tax) during fiscal 2006. Prior to the
adoption of this statement, no compensation
cost for stock-based payment arrangements was recognized in earnings. Refer to Note 12 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion. |
|
(3) |
|
Included in total other income, net is an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.0
million ($0.7 million after tax) recorded
during fiscal 2008 on an investment in a bond issued by Lehman Brothers (see Note 6 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements). |
|
(4) |
|
In fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded net discrete tax benefits of $1.2 million, $0.5
million and $4.3 million, respectively (see
Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). In fiscal 2006 and 2005, we reversed income tax
reserves of $1.6 million and
$5.7 million, respectively, primarily due to settlement of tax audits with the French government in
fiscal 2006 and the Internal
Revenue Service in fiscal 2005. |
29
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We operate in the communications technology industry, which is characterized by rapid technological
advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product
introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. We compete for customers on the
basis of existing and planned product features, service capabilities, company reputation, brand
recognition, technical support, relationships with partners, quality and reliability, product
development capabilities, price and availability. We help customers connect, monitor, and control
local or remote electronic devices over a network or via the Internet. We continue to leverage a
common core technology base to develop and provide innovative connectivity solutions to our
customers. Our Drop-In Networking Solutions initiative provides opportunities for us in the next
wave of Internet growth. The initial wave was focused on connecting people, first with personal
computers and then cell phones, PDAs and other related consumer devices. This next wave focuses
on connecting devices and machines. We are ideally positioned to take full advantage of the second
wave of Internet growth with our Drop-In Networking Solutions that will provide significant market
expansion in what is now being referred to in the market as wireless machine to machine (M2M)
connectivity.
M2M communication works by connecting communication hardware to a physical asset so that
information about its status and performance can be sent to a computer system and used to automate
a business process or a human action so that a person does not have to do it manually.
Incorporating products from both our embedded and non-embedded categories, our Drop-In Networking
Solutions are making it easy for customers to effectively drop-in a wireless M2M solution.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we expanded on Drop-in Networking and introduced our
iDigi Solutions brand. The iDigi Solution bundles software and services to our Drop-in
Networking product offerings to make M2M deployments even easier, faster, and more economical. At
the heart of the iDigi Solution bundle is the iDigi Platform, a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that
quickly and easily connects remote assets to a customers business applications. The iDigi
Platform runs on a grid of Digi-managed servers. As an on-demand model, customers pay only for
services consumed, conserving capital and requiring minimal infrastructure to operate. iDigi
Energy was launched as the first iDigi Solution bundle and targets the Smart Grid efforts of
energy services providers.
Our Drop-in Networking and iDigi Solutions brand are enabling us to pivot our business from
point products to solutions. We believe we are improving our market position by increasing
our investment in wireless products, expanding internationally, and providing full solutions
which include product and services offerings to our customers.
Our revenues consist of products that are in non-embedded and embedded product groupings. The
non-embedded products include serial cards, serial servers, USB connected products, cellular
routers, cellular gateway products, network management applications, console servers, remote
display products, wireless communications adapters, and cameras and sensors. Embedded
products include chips, modules, single-board computers, network interface cards (NICs) and
software and development tools, engineering design services and satellite communication
products. Our non-embedded serial cards and our embedded NICs are in the mature phase of
their product life cycles. Our strategy is to focus on key applications, customers and
markets to efficiently manage the migration from products that are in the mature phase of
their product life cycles to other newer technologies.
Our business was negatively impacted by the effects of the severe downturn in the economy in fiscal
2009. We experienced a reduction in demand for our products in all geographic locations. In
response to the depressed economic conditions, we put in place a restructuring plan that included
various cost reduction actions. We also reduced our investment in lower growth product lines while
increasing our investment in wireless products and solutions that include hardware, software and
services. These actions allowed us to reduce our profit breakeven point and remain profitable
despite the negative economic conditions that existed throughout fiscal 2009.
30
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OVERVIEW (CONTINUED)
On April 23, 2009, we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless
products and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring
included the closing of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation
and consolidation of the manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minneapolis,
Minnesota headquarters. The restructuring resulted in a workforce reduction of 86 positions
or 13% of our total workforce. We believe that these restructuring actions will improve
profitability in future quarters. We recorded a pre-tax charge of approximately $2.0 million
during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 related to this restructuring. We anticipate pre-tax
cost savings of approximately $1.4 million per quarter during fiscal 2010 as a result of these
initiatives (see Note 10 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
In June 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
(MobiApps), a developer of M2M communications technology focusing on satellite, cellular,
and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps provides a new generation of products based
on its own custom designed and patented mixed signal application specific integrated circuit
(ASIC), which dramatically reduces the complexity and improves performance of satellite M2M
system solutions. Satellite M2M applications include fleet management, marine vessel tracking,
container tracking, agricultural monitoring, energy management, and remote field service
applications. Satellite is especially suited to applications that cross country and
continental boundaries, providing connectivity in very remote locations, and providing mission
critical wireless backup solutions when cellular coverage is insufficient. MobiApps also has
cellular and hybrid cellular/satellite products packaged with various asset tracking
management services, including employee tracking, focused on markets in India and Southeast
Asia.
We also suspended our non-sales incentive compensation program for fiscal 2009. This program
applies to executive management as well as a large part of the employee base. In addition, we
reduced our sales commission program for the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2009.
31
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected information from our Consolidated Statements of Operations,
expressed as a percentage of net sales and as a percentage of change from year-to-year for the
years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
compared |
|
|
compared |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
to 2008 |
|
|
to 2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(10.3) |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Cost of sales (exclusive of
amortization of purchased
and core technology shown
separately below) |
|
|
80,470 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
83,096 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
77,376 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
Amortization of purchased and core
technology |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
81,265 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
97,869 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
91,346 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
7.1 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
33,499 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
24,176 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
20.2 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
78,195 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
81,854 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
71,018 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
20,328 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
(80.8 |
) |
|
|
(21.2 |
) |
Total other income, net |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
(77.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(97.0 |
) |
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
(66.9 |
)% |
|
|
(37.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET SALES
Net sales were $165.9 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $185.1 million in fiscal 2008, a decrease
of $19.2 million or 10.3%.
Net sales in fiscal 2009 and 2008 included $20.7 million and $6.5 million of net sales from Sarian
and Spectrum products, respectively. Revenue decreased primarily due to weakened economic
conditions and changes in product mix. Fiscal 2009 net sales also included $0.4 million
attributable to MobiApps which was acquired on June 8, 2009. Fiscal 2008 net sales of $6.5 million
included five months of Sarian net sales and two months of Spectrum net sales based on their dates
of acquisition. Net sales from all other product lines decreased by $33.8 million, or 18.9%,
primarily due to recent economic conditions, except for increases in net sales of cellular,
wireless communication adapters and chips and software.
As we continue to focus on growing our wireless and international sales, our wireless product net
sales grew from $46.7 million, or 25.2% of total net sales, in fiscal 2008 to $56.2 million, or
33.9% of total net sales, in fiscal 2009, or an increase of 20.3%. International net sales were
$75.2 million, or 45.3% of total net sales, in fiscal 2009, compared to $77.7 million, or 42.0% of
net sales, in fiscal 2008.
Net sales were $185.1 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $173.3 million in fiscal 2007, an increase
of $11.8 million, or 6.8%. Net sales in fiscal 2008 included five months of Sarian product sales
of $5.7 million and two months of Spectrum product sales of $0.8 million based on their dates of
acquisition. Net sales of all other products, except serial cards and NICs, increased by $8.7
million, or 5.8%. Net sales of serial cards, a non- embedded product, and NICs, an embedded
product, decreased by $3.4 million, or 14.6%. Serial cards are in a mature market that is
declining at a rate of approximately 15% 20% per year. Serial cards net sales
32
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
represented 10.0% of total net sales for fiscal 2008. NICs are at the end of their product life
cycle and represented less than 1% of our net sales for fiscal 2008.
Fluctuation in foreign currency rates compared to the prior years rates in each case had an
unfavorable impact on net sales of $5.9 million in fiscal 2009, a favorable impact on net sales of
$2.2 million in fiscal 2008 and a favorable impact on net sales of $2.3 million in fiscal 2007.
Net Sales by Products
The following table presents our revenue by product category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Non-embedded |
|
$ |
91.2 |
|
|
$ |
98.5 |
|
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
|
57.1 |
% |
Embedded |
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
173.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Embedded
Our non-embedded products net sales decreased $7.3 million, or 7.3%, in fiscal 2009 compared to
fiscal 2008 due mostly to decreases in sales of serial cards, serial servers and USB connected
products, partially offset by increases in cellular and wireless communication adapters.
Non-embedded net sales related to Sarian branded products were $16.2 million in fiscal 2009 as
compared to $5.7 million in fiscal 2008 which included five months of Sarian net sales based on the
date of acquisition.
Our non-embedded products net sales decreased $0.4 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.
Serial card revenue continued to decline along with a reduction of serial server revenue, partially
offset by an increase in revenue in wireless routers due to the acquisition of Sarian.
Embedded
Embedded products net sales decreased $11.9 million, or 13.8%, in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008 due mostly to decreases of modules and NIC sales, partially offset by an increase in chips and
software. Embedded net sales include incremental net sales of $3.7 million of Spectrum design
services revenue in fiscal 2009.
Embedded products net sales increased $12.2 million, or 16.4%, in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal
2007. Net sales of modules including wireless modules increased $9.6 million in fiscal 2008
compared to fiscal 2007. The remaining increase was due to an increase in design services revenue
as a result of the acquisition of Spectrum along with an increase in chips and software revenue,
partially offset by a slight decline of the NIC sales.
Net Sales by Distribution Channels
The following table presents our revenue by distribution channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Direct / OEM channel |
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
|
$ |
87.5 |
|
|
$ |
88.6 |
|
|
|
47.3 |
% |
|
|
47.3 |
% |
|
|
51.1 |
% |
Distribution channel |
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total company |
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
173.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
The decreases in both the Direct/OEM and the Distribution channels during fiscal 2009 are primarily
resulting from a weakened economy. We continued to focus on maintaining our channel strategy,
which includes employing additional channel partners and releasing complementary products. During
fiscal 2008, net sales in the Direct/OEM channel decreased due to a decline in net sales in North
America and a change in the product mix.
Net Sales by Geographic Area
Our revenue by geographic location of our customers is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
($ in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
|
$ |
107.3 |
|
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
64.7 |
% |
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
Asian countries |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Latin America |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
165.9 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
173.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net sales of $19.2 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 is due in
general to the weakened global economy which affected all geographic locations.
The decrease of $20.5 million in net sales in North America was offset by incremental revenue of
$3.8 million from the Spectrum acquisition and $0.1 million from the MobiApps acquisition both
included in embedded products. The decrease in net sales in North America in fiscal 2008 is
primarily due a reduction in net sales of non-embedded products, partially offset by the increase
in embedded products which includes the incremental net sales of $0.8 million resulting from the
Spectrum acquisition.
The increase in net sales in Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) during the past two fiscal
years is primarily due to the acquisition of Sarian which provided revenue of $16.2 million and
$5.7 million for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Revenue for the Latin America and Asian countries locations decreased by $5.6 million in fiscal
2009 compared to fiscal 2008 and revenue increased by $4.9 million in fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007. The decrease in revenue for fiscal 2009 for the Latin America location was primarily
due to a reduction in net sales of non-embedded products, and for the Asian countries revenue
decreased due to a reduction in net sales of both embedded and non-embedded products primarily
resulting from the global economic conditions. MobiApps revenue of $0.3 million from date of
acquisition is included in fiscal 2009 Asian countries revenue.
GROSS PROFIT
2009 Compared to 2008
Gross margin for fiscal 2009 was 49.0% compared to 52.9% for 2008. The decrease in gross margin is
primarily a result of product and customer mix changes. The gross margin also decreased due to an
increase in the amortization of purchased and core technology due to the acquisitions of Sarian,
Spectrum and MobiApps. Amortization of purchased and core technology was $4.2 million or 2.5% of
net sales in fiscal 2009 as compared to $4.1 million or 2.2% of net sales in fiscal 2008.
34
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
GROSS PROFIT (CONTINUED)
2008 Compared to 2007
The gross margin for fiscal 2008 was 52.9% compared to 52.7% in 2007. The increase in gross margin
is due to a reduction in the amortization of purchased and core technology, partially offset by a
decrease in gross margin due to product mix changes among products within both the embedded and
non-embedded product groups, including lower gross margins provided by Sarian non-embedded
products. Amortization of purchased and core technology was $4.1 million or 2.2% of net sales in
fiscal 2008 as compared to $4.5 million or 2.6% of net sales in fiscal 2007.
OPERATING EXPENSES
2009 Compared to 2008
Operating expenses were $78.2 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $3.7 million or 4.5%, compared
to $81.9 million in fiscal 2008. Compensation-related expenses, including salaries, incentive
compensation and stock-based compensation, decreased by $3.2 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to
fiscal 2008 due to the suspension of our non-sales incentive program for fiscal 2009 and a
reduction of our sales commission program in the last half of fiscal 2009 as well as a reduction in
the number of employees. Incremental operating expenses resulting from the acquisitions of Sarian,
Spectrum and MobiApps were $4.4 million. We recorded a charge of $1.9 million for in-process
research and development incurred in 2008 resulting from the Sarian acquisition. On April 23,
2009, we announced a restructuring initiative that resulted in a restructuring charge of $2.0
million.
Sales and marketing expenses were $35.3 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $1.6 million or 4.3%,
compared to $36.9 million in fiscal 2008. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $0.9 million
for compensation-related expenses, $1.2 million for advertising and marketing literature, $0.5
million for reduced travel and entertainment and by $0.3 million for miscellaneous other sales and
marketing expenses. This was partially offset by incremental expenses related to Sarian, Spectrum
and MobiApps which increased sales and marketing expenses by $1.3 million.
Research and development expenses were $26.4 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $0.7 million or
2.4%, compared to $27.1 million in fiscal 2008. Research and development expenses decreased by
$1.2 million for compensation-related expenses, $0.3 million for product certifications and $0.5
million for other research and development expenses. This was partially offset by incremental
expenses for Sarian, Spectrum and MobiApps which increased research and development expenses by
$1.3 million.
General and administrative expenses were $14.5 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $1.5 million
or 9.2%, compared to 16.0 million in fiscal 2008. The reduction in general and administrative
expenses were due to decreases of $1.1 million for compensation-related expenses, $0.6 million for
professional fees, $0.5 million for amortization and depreciation, $0.6 million for bad debt
expense and a $0.5 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses. This was
partially offset by incremental expenses of $1.8 million due to Sarian, Spectrum and MobiApps.
2008 Compared to 2007
Operating expenses were $81.9 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of $10.9 million or 15.3%,
compared to $71.0 million in fiscal 2007. The incremental operating expenses resulting from the
acquisition of Sarian on April 28, 2008, were $3.6 million, which includes a $1.9 million charge
for in-process research and development expenses. The Spectrum acquisition resulted in additional
operating expenses of $0.4 million. Compensation-related expenses, including salaries and cash
incentive compensation and stock-based compensation, increased by $3.1 million in fiscal 2008
compared to fiscal 2007 due to merit increases and an increase in employees
35
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
OPERATING EXPENSES (CONTINUED)
primarily as a result of acquisitions, offset by a lower level of cash incentive compensation based
on lower than planned revenue and other defined performance measures. The remaining $3.8 million
increase in operating expenses was primarily due to incremental spending related to our Drop-in
Networking initiative.
Sales and marketing expenses were $36.9 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of $3.4 million or
10.1%, compared to $33.5 million in fiscal 2007. The incremental expenses related to the Sarian
and Spectrum acquisitions increased sales and marketing expenses by $0.9 million. In addition,
sales and marketing expenses increased by $1.4 million for compensation-related expenses, $0.6
million for advertising and marketing literature and by $0.5 million for miscellaneous other sales
and marketing expenses.
Research and development expenses were $27.1 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of $2.9 million or
11.8%, compared to $24.2 million in fiscal 2007. The incremental expenses related to the Sarian
and Spectrum acquisitions increased research and development expenses by $0.4 million. Other
increases in research and development expenses were $1.2 million for compensation-related expenses,
$0.5 million for product certification testing, $0.3 million for professional fees and $0.5 million
for other research and development expenses.
General and administrative expenses were $16.0 million in fiscal 2008, an increase of $2.7 million
or 20.2%, compared to $13.3 million in fiscal 2007. The incremental expenses related to the Sarian
and Spectrum acquisitions increased general and administrative expenses by $0.9 million. In
addition, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.4 million as we recognized only a
$0.1 million gain on the sale of the Dortmund, Germany building during fiscal 2008 compared to a
one-time $0.5 million gain in fiscal 2007 on the sale of undeveloped land in Davis, California.
Other increases in general and administrative expenses were primarily due to $0.5 million of
compensation-related expenses, $0.4 million due to bad debt expense and $0.5 million in
professional fees.
RESTRUCTURING
On April 23, 2009, we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless
products and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring
included the closing of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation
and consolidation of the manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minneapolis,
Minnesota headquarters. We paid a lease cancellation fee for one of the leased facilities in
Davis and had vacated the facility as of September 30, 2009. We continue to maintain
non-manufacturing activities at the remaining leased facility in Davis, California. As a
result of these initiatives, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 we recorded a $2.0
million charge, which consisted of $1.8 million for employee termination costs for 86
positions and $0.2 million for contract termination fees and other relocation costs.
All 86 positions have been vacated as of September 30, 2009. The employee termination costs
include severance and the associated costs of continued medical benefits and outplacement
services. The other restructuring expenses include contract termination fees for non-renewal
of lease terms relating to one of the facilities in Davis, California and relocation expenses
for employees.
36
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Sarian Systems, Ltd.
On April 28, 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), which merged into Digi
International Ltd. as of October 1, 2009. Prior to the acquisition, Sarian was a privately
held corporation. Sarian is located in the United Kingdom and is a leader in the European
wireless router market. The total purchase price of $30.9 million was for all of the
outstanding ordinary shares of Sarian.
At the time of acquisition, Sarian had development projects in process associated with the IPV6,
Gate Array and VPN technologies. We estimated that $1.9 million of the purchase price represented
the fair value of acquired in-process research and development related to the products listed below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
IPV6 |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
Gate Array |
|
|
400 |
|
VPN technologies |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total in-process research and development |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
These products were under development, had a measurable percentage completed and a documented
expected life, had not yet reached technological feasibility, and had no alternative future uses.
This amount was expensed as a non-deductible tax charge upon consummation of the acquisition.
All of the acquired development projects were completed in fiscal 2009.
OTHER INCOME, NET
2009 Compared to 2008
Other income, net was $1.2 million in fiscal 2009, a decrease of $1.7 million compared to $2.9
million in fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, we realized $1.4 million of interest income on
marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents compared to $3.6 million during fiscal 2008.
The decrease in interest income was due to lower average investment balances and lower average
interest rates. The average investment balance during fiscal 2009 was $57.6 million compared to
$77.1 million for fiscal 2008. We earned an average interest rate of 2.4% during fiscal 2009
compared to 4.5% for fiscal 2008. Other income, net decreased $0.4 million related to a net
decrease in foreign currency transaction gains in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. We recorded
an other-than-temporary impairment charge in fiscal 2008 related to the Lehman Brothers Bond of
$1.0 million. No additional impairment was recorded in fiscal 2009.
2008 Compared to 2007
Total other income, net was $2.9 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $3.4 million in fiscal 2007.
We realized interest income on marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents of $3.6 million
in fiscal 2008 compared to $3.5 million in fiscal 2007. The increase in interest income was
primarily due to a higher average investment balance of $77.1 million in fiscal 2008 compared to
$66.7 million in fiscal 2007, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average interest
rate. Before impairment on the Lehman Brothers Bond, we earned an average interest rate of
approximately 4.5% during fiscal 2008 compared to an approximate rate of 5.1% for fiscal 2007.
Interest expense was $0.2 million in fiscal 2008 primarily related to interest on the $25.0 million
short-term loan that was used to finance the Sarian acquisition, interest on capital leases and
interest accrued on the deferred payment for the Spectrum acquisition. The short-term loan was
paid in full in May 2008. We also recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.0
million in fiscal 2008 for the Lehman Brothers Bond included in our marketable securities portfolio
(see Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Included in other income, net for fiscal
2008, was $0.5 million of net foreign currency transaction gains.
37
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was 4.6%, 34.7% and 16.7% for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
During fiscal 2009, we reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and settlement of prior liabilities
under amnesty programs. We recorded an additional current discrete tax benefit of $0.5 million
resulting from the enactment on October 3, 2008 of the retroactive extension of the research and
development tax credit for activity from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008. We also recorded
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2007 and 2008. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 27 percentage points in fiscal 2009.
During fiscal 2008, we reversed $0.3 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year. We recorded an additional $0.2
million of discrete tax benefits as a result of a filing of a prior year tax return and adjustments
to actual for items reported on the tax returns for fiscal 2007.
During fiscal 2007, we reversed $3.6 million in income tax reserves associated with the closing of
a German tax audit and the statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year. We also
recorded other discrete tax benefits of $0.7 million primarily related to the filing of U.S.
amended tax returns, enactment of the extension of the research and development tax credit, and
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2006. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 18.2 percentage points in fiscal 2007.
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 34.0% due to
reversals of tax reserves and other discrete tax benefits and the deduction for domestic production
activities. The U.S. statutory rate is 34.0% for taxable income less than $10.0 million.
The effective tax rates for fiscal 2008 and 2007 are lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0%
primarily due to the aforementioned income tax benefits and the utilization of income tax credits
and exclusions for extraterritorial income in fiscal 2007 and the domestic production activities
deduction in both fiscal 2008 and 2007.
INFLATION
Management believes that during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, inflation has not had a material
effect on our operations or on our consolidated financial position.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our operations principally with funds generated from operations. We had cash,
cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $70.7 million, $73.5 million and $85.5
million at September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our working capital was $106.1
million, $112.2 million and $115.7 million at September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
38
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow Highlights (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
15,686 |
|
|
$ |
24,070 |
|
|
$ |
26,379 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
25,286 |
|
|
|
(22,370 |
) |
|
|
(28,715 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(5,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,564 |
) |
|
|
4,811 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
34,258 |
|
|
$ |
(4,199 |
) |
|
$ |
2,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $15.7 million during fiscal 2009 compared to
$24.1 million for fiscal 2008, a net decrease of $8.4 million. This net decrease is primarily
due to a decrease in net income of $8.3 million, and decreases of $1.0 million related to an
other-than-temporary impairment charge during fiscal 2008, $1.1 million in deferred income
taxes, and $1.9 million related to an in-process research and development charge in fiscal
2008. This was partially offset by an increase of $1.1 million of other non-cash items and an
increase of $3.5 million due to changes in working capital. The changes in working capital
increased cash flows by $3.5 million primarily due to increases resulting from changes in
accounts receivable and inventories, partially offset by decreases in accounts payable, income
taxes payable (receivable) and other accrued expenses. Net cash provided by operating
activities was $24.1 million during fiscal 2008 compared to $26.4 million during fiscal 2007,
a net decrease of $2.3 million. This net decrease is primarily due to a decrease in net
income of $7.4 million, a decrease of $1.5 million related to deferred income taxes, offset by
$1.0 million of other-than-temporary impairment on marketable securities during fiscal 2008,
$1.9 million of in-process research and development charges in fiscal 2008, $1.1 million of
other non-cash items and $2.6 million of increases due to changes in working capital. Changes
in working capital increased cash flows by $2.6 million primarily due to increases resulting
from changes in inventories, accounts payable and income taxes payable, partially offset by
changes in accounts receivable and accrued expenses.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $25.3 million in fiscal 2009 as compared to net cash
used in investing activities of $22.4 million and $28.7 million used during fiscal 2008 and 2007,
respectively. While net settlements from marketable securities were $32.1 million and $8.7 million
for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, net purchases of marketable securities were $26.0 million
for fiscal 2007. Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment amounted to $6.9 million related
to the sale of our building in Dortmund, Germany (see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements) and $1.0 million during fiscal 2007, while purchases of property, equipment,
improvements and certain other intangible assets were $3.9 million, $4.4 million and $2.9 million
for fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. During fiscal 2008, we paid a deposit of $0.4
million for the Dortmund building leaseback. We also used $1.3 million in fiscal 2008 and $0.8
million in fiscal 2007 for contingent purchase price payments related to the acquisition of FS
Forth. During fiscal 2009, we paid $3.0 million in cash for the acquisition of the assets of
MobiApps. During fiscal 2008, we paid $27.8 million (net of cash acquired of $3.1 million) for the
acquisition of Sarian and we paid $4.0 million in cash for the acquisition of Spectrum.
39
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
Net cash used in financing activities was $5.4 million in fiscal 2009 as $6.6 million was used to
repurchase treasury stock and $0.3 million was used for capital lease obligations, partially offset
by cash received from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan transactions
of $1.5 million. Net cash used in financing activities was $2.6 million in fiscal 2008 as $5.1
million was used to repurchase treasury stock and $0.4 million was used for capital lease
obligations, partially offset by cash received from the exercise of stock options and employee
stock purchase plan transactions of $2.9 million. We also borrowed and repaid a $25.0 million loan
during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 to finance the Sarian acquisition. During fiscal 2007, we
generated $4.8 million from financing activities primarily due to $5.2 million of cash received
from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan transactions. We used $0.4
million for capital lease obligations.
We expect positive cash flows from operations and believe that our current cash balance and our
potential capacity for additional debt and/or equity financing will be sufficient to fund our
business operations for the next twelve months.
The following summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by fiscal period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
8,701 |
|
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
|
$ |
3,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred payments on acquisition |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
14,711 |
|
|
$ |
5,756 |
|
|
$ |
6,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
|
|
The operating lease agreements included above primarily relate to office space. The table above
does not include possible payments for uncertain tax positions. Our reserve for uncertain tax
positions, including accrued interest and penalties, was $4.9 million as of September 30, 2009.
Due to the nature of the underlying liabilities and the extended time often needed to resolve
income tax uncertainties, we cannot make reliable estimates of the amount or timing of cash
payments that may be required to settle these liabilities.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions being
denominated in Euros, British Pounds or Japanese Yen and foreign currency translation risk as the
financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S.
Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce foreign
currency risk.
During 2009, we had approximately $75.2 million of net sales related to foreign customers including
export sales, of which $33.4 million was denominated in foreign currency, predominately the Euro
and British Pound. During 2008 and 2007, we had approximately $76.1 million and $61.2 million,
respectively, of net sales to foreign customers including export sales, of which $45.7 million and
$30.1 million, respectively, were denominated in foreign currency, predominately the Euro. In
future periods, a significant portion of sales will continue to be made in Euros and British
Pounds.
40
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
FOREIGN CURRENCY (CONTINUED)
During fiscal 2008, we acquired Sarian for $30.9 million, which was partially financed by an
intercompany loan from both Digi International Inc. for $25.0 million and Digi GmbH for $2.9
million. The Digi GmbH intercompany loan for $2.9 million was paid in March 2009 and the Digi
International Inc. $25.0 million loan was converted to capital on October 1, 2008. The translation
adjustments related to the $2.9 million intercompany loan were recorded in other income, net within
our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards and provided guidance for
identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple deliverables
exist, and provided guidance for allocation and recognizing revenue based on those separate
deliverables. This guidance is expected to result in more multiple-deliverable arrangements being
separable than under current guidance. This guidance is effective for revenue arrangements entered
into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain
revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing
accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software
components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality shall be
excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly,
sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards
or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement
consideration for each element of the arrangement. This guidance is effective for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010.
Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new standard on business combinations. This new standard
retained the fundamental requirements in the former standard that the acquisition method of
accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method) be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This
standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in
the business combination and established the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer
achieves control. The new standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree. This new standard also makes certain other modifications to the former standard and
is effective for business combinations that are consummated by us beginning October 1, 2009.
Early adoption is not permitted. We adopted this standard effective October 1, 2009 and this
standard could have a material impact on how we will identify, negotiate, and value future
acquisitions and how such acquisitions will affect our consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the
values of purchased assets and assumed liabilities in acquisitions. We base our estimates on
historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
41
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of embedded and non-embedded products to our
distributors and Direct (end-user) / OEM customers, and to a small extent from the sale of software
licenses, fees associated with technical support, training, professional and engineering services
and royalties. We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably
assured and there are no post-delivery obligations other than warranty.
Under these criteria, product revenue is generally recognized upon shipment of product to
customers. Sales to authorized domestic distributors and Direct / OEMs are made with certain
rights of return and price adjustment provisions. Estimated reserves for future returns and
pricing adjustments are established by us based on an analysis of historical patterns of returns
and price adjustments as well as an analysis of authorized returns compared to received returns,
current on-hand inventory at distributors, and distribution sales for the current period.
Estimated reserves for future returns and price adjustments are charged against revenues in the
same period as the corresponding sales are recorded. Material differences between the historical
trends used to determine estimated reserves and actual returns and pricing adjustments could result
in a material change to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. We have
applied consistent methodologies for estimating reserves for future returns and pricing adjustments
for all years presented. The reserve for future returns and pricing adjustments was $1.1 million
and $1.4 million at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We also generate revenue from the sale of software licenses, post-contract customer support, fees
associated with technical support, training, professional and engineering services and royalties.
Revenue recognized resulting from such non-product sales represented 0.3% of net sales in fiscal
2009, 0.8% of net sales in fiscal 2008 and 0.4% of net sales in fiscal 2007. Our software
development tools and development boards often include multiple elements, including hardware,
software licenses, post-contract customer support, limited training and basic hardware design
review. Our customers purchase these products and services during their product development
process in which they use the tools to build network connectivity into the devices they are
manufacturing. Revenue for software licenses, professional and engineering services and training
is recognized upon performance, which includes delivery of a final product version and acceptance
by the customer. For post-contract customer support and fees associated with technical support,
revenue is deferred and recognized over the life of the contract as service is performed. Unearned
post-contract customer support and unearned nonrecurring engineering services revenue is included
in deferred revenue on the balance sheet.
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
We regularly monitor and evaluate the realizable value of our marketable securities. When
assessing marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider factors
including how significant the decline in value is as a percentage of the original cost, how long
the market value of the investment has been less than its original cost, the underlying factors
contributing to a decline in the prices of securities in a single asset class, the performance of
the issuers stock price in relation to the stock price of its competitors within the
42
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
industry, expected market volatility, analyst recommendations, the views of external investment
managers, any news or financial information that has been released specific to the investee and the
outlook for the overall industry in which the issuer operates. If events and circumstances
indicate that a decline in the value of these securities has occurred and is other-than-temporary,
we would record a charge to other income (expense). As described in Note 6 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements, we hold one security that is other-than-temporarily impaired.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, which reflects the estimate of losses that may
result from the inability of some of our customers to make required payments. The estimate for the
allowance for doubtful accounts is based on known circumstances regarding collectability of
customer accounts and historical collections experience. If the financial condition of one or more
of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required. Material differences between the historical trends used to estimate
the allowance for doubtful accounts and actual collection experience could result in a material
change to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. The allowance for doubtful
accounts was $0.6 million at September 30, 2009 and $0.7 million at September 30, 2008.
INVENTORIES AND RESERVES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. We reduce the carrying value of our inventories for estimated excess
and obsolete inventories equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated
realizable value based upon assumptions about future product demand and market conditions. If
actual product demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management,
additional inventory write-downs may be required that could result in a material change to our
consolidated results of operations or financial position. We have applied consistent methodologies
for the net realizable value of inventories. The reserve for excess and obsolete inventory was
$1.8 million and $1.7 million at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. Based on our annual goodwill impairment
assessment on June 30, 2009, we concluded that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeded the
carrying amount and therefore potential goodwill impairment was not indicated. We continue to
closely monitor the continuing impacts of the economic downturn on our expected operating results
and the broader effects of U.S. market conditions on the fair value of our assets. As of September
30, 2009 our market capitalization was below the carrying value of our reporting unit due to a
decline in our stock price during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. However, our market
capitalization plus our estimated control premium of 35% resulted in a fair value in excess of our
carrying value and therefore no impairment was indicated. The control premium represents the
amount an investor would pay, over and above market capitalization, in order to obtain a
controlling interest in a company. The estimated control premium was determined by a review of
premiums paid for similar companies over the past five years.
43
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
INCOME TAXES
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income, and other complex issues, may require an extended period of time to
resolve and could result in adjustments to our income tax balances that are material to our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
We have unrecognized tax benefits of $4.1 million classified as a long-term liability as we do not
expect significant payments to occur over the next 12 months. The total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits that if recognized would affect the effective tax rate is $3.4 million. We recognize
interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
WARRANTIES
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from 90 days to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to repair or replace products we deem defective due to material or
workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is
recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the
estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty
incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty accrual.
The product warranty accrual was $1.0 million at September 30, 2009 and $1.2 million for each of
the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
44
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We do not use
derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate risk as all investments are
currently held to maturity and the majority of our investments mature in less than a year.
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
We are exposed to foreign currency risk associated with certain sales transactions being
denominated in Euros, British Pounds or Japanese Yen and foreign currency translation risk as the
financial position and operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S.
Dollars for consolidation. We have not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce foreign
currency risk.
During fiscal 2009, the average monthly exchange rate for the Euro to the U.S. Dollar decreased by
approximately 9.9% from 1.5038 to 1.3547, the average monthly exchange rate for the British Pound
to the U.S. Dollar decreased approximately 21.4% from 1.9730 to 1.5517 and the average monthly
exchange rate for the Japanese Yen to the U.S. Dollar increased by approximately 13.1% from .0093
to .0105. A 10.0% change from the 2009 average exchange rate for the Euro, British Pound and Yen
to the U.S. Dollar would have resulted in a 2.0% increase or decrease in annual net sales and a
2.4% increase or decrease in stockholders equity. The above analysis does not take into
consideration any pricing adjustments we may need to consider in response to changes in the
exchange rate.
CREDIT RISK
We have some exposure to credit risk related to our accounts receivable portfolio. Exposure to
credit risk is controlled through regular monitoring of customer financial status, credit limits
and collaboration with sales management on customer contacts to facilitate payment.
Investments are made in accordance with our investment policy and consist of certificates of
deposit, corporate bonds and government bonds. We may have some exposure related to the fair value
of our securities, which could change significantly based on changes in market conditions and
continued uncertainties in the credit markets. If these uncertainties continue or if these
securities experience credit rating downgrades, we may incur additional impairment charges for
other securities in our investment portfolio.
45
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of operations, of cash flows and of stockholders equity and comprehensive income
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Digi International Inc. and its
subsidiaries at September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2009 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our
opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to
express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
46
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (CONTINUED)
As discussed in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has
excluded MobiApps from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September
30, 2009 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during fiscal
year 2009. MobiApps is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose assets and total revenues represent 0.6%
and 0.2%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the
year ended September 30, 2009.
/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 24, 2009
47
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED)
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of amortization of purchased
and core technology shown separately below) |
|
|
80,470 |
|
|
|
83,096 |
|
|
|
77,376 |
|
Amortization of purchased and core technology |
|
|
4,193 |
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
81,265 |
|
|
|
97,869 |
|
|
|
91,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
35,304 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
33,499 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
26,381 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
24,176 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
Retructuring costs |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research & development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
78,195 |
|
|
|
81,854 |
|
|
|
71,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
20,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
3,579 |
|
|
|
3,482 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Impairment of marketable security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
18,915 |
|
|
|
23,724 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, basic |
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
25,659 |
|
|
|
25,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, diluted |
|
|
25,183 |
|
|
|
26,242 |
|
|
|
26,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
48
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED)
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
48,434 |
|
|
$ |
14,176 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
22,311 |
|
|
|
59,337 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
19,032 |
|
|
|
24,310 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
26,619 |
|
|
|
30,240 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
122,655 |
|
|
|
133,169 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net |
|
|
16,678 |
|
|
|
16,255 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
|
|
26,877 |
|
|
|
34,032 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
86,558 |
|
|
|
86,578 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Other |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
$ |
271,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,567 |
|
|
$ |
10,343 |
|
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
5,981 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,035 |
|
|
|
3,395 |
|
Deferred payment on acquisition |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,534 |
|
|
|
20,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
7,582 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
4,893 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
Deferred payments on acquisition |
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
29,362 |
|
|
|
39,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
28,409,198 and 28,335,876 shares issued |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
181,282 |
|
|
|
177,614 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
82,708 |
|
|
|
78,625 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(6,527 |
) |
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
Treasury
stock, at cost, 3,708,302 and 2,960,457 shares |
|
|
(28,161 |
) |
|
|
(22,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
229,586 |
|
|
|
231,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
258,948 |
|
|
$ |
271,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
49
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED)
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, equipment and improvements |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets and other assets |
|
|
7,476 |
|
|
|
6,830 |
|
|
|
7,712 |
|
Bad debt/product return (benefit) provision, net |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
Impairment on marketable security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
Acquired in-process research & development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
(3,093 |
) |
|
|
(4,448 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Income taxes (receivable) payable |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(4,561 |
) |
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
15,686 |
|
|
$ |
24,070 |
|
|
$ |
26,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(30,489 |
) |
|
|
(69,196 |
) |
|
|
(92,742 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
62,624 |
|
|
|
77,857 |
|
|
|
66,757 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6,954 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Purchase of property, equipment, improvements and certain
other intangible assets |
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
|
|
(4,425 |
) |
|
|
(2,899 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Contingent purchase price payments related to acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
(781 |
) |
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(2,986 |
) |
|
|
(31,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
25,286 |
|
|
|
(22,370 |
) |
|
|
(28,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
(369 |
) |
Borrowing on note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment on note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option plan transactions |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan transactions |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(5,427 |
) |
|
|
(2,564 |
) |
|
|
4,811 |
|
Effect of exchange rates changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,287 |
) |
|
|
(3,335 |
) |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
34,258 |
|
|
|
(4,199 |
) |
|
|
2,701 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
14,176 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
15,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
48,434 |
|
|
$ |
14,176 |
|
|
$ |
18,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flows Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
Income taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
3,944 |
|
|
$ |
8,143 |
|
|
$ |
4,072 |
|
Other non-cash financing and investing items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred payment liability related to acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,537 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Equipment acquired under capital lease |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrual for FS Forth-Systeme GmbH contingent purchase price payment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
950 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
50
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (CONTINUED)
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
For the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balances, September 30, 2006 |
|
|
27,749 |
|
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
|
$ |
(19,178 |
) |
|
$ |
164,782 |
|
|
$ |
47,009 |
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
193,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,773 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
537 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2007 |
|
|
28,154 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
(18,435 |
) |
|
|
172,156 |
|
|
|
66,782 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
$ |
222,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect from adoption
of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(508 |
) |
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
28,336 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
(22,691 |
) |
|
|
177,614 |
|
|
|
78,625 |
|
|
|
(1,897 |
) |
|
$ |
231,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments
(net of related tax effect of $2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Reclassification of gain included in net
income
(net of related tax effect of $3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase issuances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,576 |
) |
Issuance of stock upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
Tax benefit realized upon exercise
of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
28,409 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
(28,161 |
) |
|
|
181,282 |
|
|
|
82,708 |
|
|
|
(6,527 |
) |
|
$ |
229,586 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BUSINESS DESCRIPTION
We are a worldwide leader in device networking for business, developing reliable products and
technologies to connect and securely manage local or remote electronic devices over a network, via
the Internet or via satellite. Businesses use our products to create, customize and control retail
operations, industrial automation and other applications.
Our products are sold globally through distributors, systems integrators, solution providers and
direct marketers as well as direct to strategic OEMs, government and commercial partners.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents consist of money market accounts and other highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due
to the short maturities of these investments.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government
municipal bonds. We changed our policy as of October 1, 2008 to account for our marketable
securities as available-for-sale on a prospective basis. Prior to October 1, 2008 all
marketable securities purchased were classified as held-to-maturity and were carried at
amortized cost. All marketable securities purchased after October 1, 2008 are carried at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders
equity. We obtain quoted market prices and trading activity for each security, where
available, review the financial solvency of each security issuer and obtain other relevant
information from our investment advisors to estimate the fair value for each security in our
investment portfolio.
We regularly monitor and evaluate the value of our marketable securities. When assessing
marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, we consider factors including how
significant the decline in value is as a percentage of the original cost, how long the market value
of the investment has been less than its original cost, the underlying factors contributing to a
decline in the prices of securities in a single asset class, the performance of the issuers stock
price in relation to the stock price of its competitors within the industry, expected market
volatility, analyst recommendations, the views of external investment managers, any news or
financial information that has been released specific to the investee and the outlook for the
overall industry in which the issuer operates. If events and circumstances indicate that a decline
in the value of a security has occurred and is other-than-temporary, we would record a charge to
other income (expense). As described in Note 6, we hold one security that we have deemed to be
other-than-temporarily impaired.
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect, which is net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. The following factors are considered when determining the collectability of
specific customer accounts: customer
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE (CONTINUED)
creditworthiness, past transaction history with the customer, and changes in customer payment terms
or practices. In addition, overall historical collection experience, current economic industry
trends, and a review of the current status of trade accounts receivable are considered when
determining the required allowance for doubtful accounts. Based on our assessment, we provide for
estimated uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to our allowance for
doubtful accounts. Balances that remain outstanding after we have used reasonable collection
efforts are written off through a charge to the allowance for doubtful accounts and a credit to
accounts receivable.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out method. Appropriate consideration is given to deterioration, obsolescence and
other factors in evaluating fair market value.
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS, NET
Property, equipment and improvements are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided by charges to operations using the straight-line method over the estimated
asset useful lives. Furniture and fixtures and other equipment are depreciated over a period of
three to five years. Building improvements and buildings are depreciated over ten and thirty-nine
years, respectively. Equipment under capital lease is depreciated over the lease term. We own and
occupy two buildings located in Minnetonka and Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred, while major
renewals and betterments are capitalized. The assets and related accumulated depreciation accounts
are adjusted for asset retirements and disposals with the resulting gain or loss included in
operations.
IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Purchased proven technology, license agreements, covenants not to compete and other identifiable
intangible assets are recorded at fair value when acquired in a business acquisition, or at cost
when not purchased in a business acquisition. Purchased in-process research and development costs
(IPR&D) have been expensed upon consummation of the related business acquisition. Effective
October 1, 2009 in-process research and development costs will be capitalized according to new
authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to business combinations. All other identifiable
intangible assets are amortized on either a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives
of three to thirteen years or based on the pattern in which the asset is consumed. Useful lives
for identifiable intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based on the periods of
time from which we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable intangible assets. Amortization
of purchased and core technology is presented as a separate component of cost of sales in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization of all other acquired identifiable intangible
assets is charged to operating expense as a component of general and administrative expense.
Identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate that undiscounted expected future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying
value amount. We measure impairment loss by utilizing an undiscounted cash flow valuation
technique using fair values indicated by the income approach. Impairment losses, if any, would be
recorded in the current period. No impairments were identified during fiscal 2009, 2008 or 2007.
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired.
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of June 30, or more frequently if events or
circumstances occur which could indicate impairment. Based on our annual goodwill impairment
assessment on June 30, 2009, we concluded that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeded the
carrying amount and, therefore, potential goodwill impairment was not indicated. We continue to
closely monitor the continuing impacts of the economic downturn on our expected operating results
and the broader effects of U.S. market conditions on the fair value of our assets. As of September
30, 2009, our market capitalization was below the carrying value of our reporting unit due to a
decline in our stock price during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. However, our market
capitalization plus our estimated control premium of 35% resulted in a fair value in excess of our
carrying value and therefore no impairment was indicated. The control premium represents the
amount an investor would pay, over and above market capitalization, in order to obtain a
controlling interest in a company. The estimated control premium was determined by a review of
premiums paid for similar companies over the past five years.
During our annual goodwill impairment assessment that was performed as of June 30, 2008, we
concluded that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount and,
therefore, goodwill was not considered impaired. When the assessment was performed, our
market capitalization was below the carrying value of our reporting unit due to significant
declines in our stock price during the year. The fair value of our reporting unit was
measured using our market capitalization as of June 30, 2008 plus a control premium. The
estimated control premium was determined by a review of premiums paid for similar companies
over the past five years.
We also performed our annual goodwill impairment assessment as of June 30, 2007 for our one
reporting unit. Since the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded book value at this date,
there was no impairment identified.
We have defined the criteria that will result in additional interim goodwill impairment
testing. If these criteria are met, we will undertake an analysis to determine whether a
goodwill impairment has occurred, which could have a material effect on our consolidated
financial position and results of operations. The evaluation of asset impairment may require
us to make assumptions about future cash flows and revenues. These assumptions require
significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed or estimated amounts. If
these estimates and assumptions change, we may be required to recognize impairment losses in
the future.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to revenue
recognition.
Revenue recognized for product sales was 99.7% of net sales in fiscal 2009, 99.2% of net sales in
fiscal 2008 and 99.6% in fiscal 2007. We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability
is reasonably assured and there are no post-delivery obligations, other than warranty. Under these
criteria, product revenue is generally recognized upon shipment of product to customers, including
Direct (end-user) / OEMs and distributors. Sales to authorized domestic distributors and Direct /
OEMs are made with certain rights of return and price adjustment provisions. Estimated reserves
for future returns and pricing adjustments are established by us based on an analysis of historical
patterns of returns and price adjustments as well as an analysis of authorized returns compared to
received returns, current on-hand inventory at distributors, and distribution sales for the current
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
REVENUE RECOGNITION (CONTINUED)
period. Estimated reserves for future returns and price adjustments are charged against revenues
in the same period as the corresponding sales are recorded.
We also generate revenue from the sale of software licenses, post-contract customer support, fees
associated with technical support, training, professional and engineering services, and royalties.
Revenue recognized resulting from such non-product sales represented 0.3% of net sales in fiscal
2009, 0.8% of net sales in fiscal 2008, and 0.4% of net sales in fiscal 2007. Our software
development tools and development boards often include multiple elements, including hardware,
software licenses, post-contract customer support, limited training and basic hardware design
review. Our customers purchase these products and services during their product development
process in which they use the tools to build network connectivity into the devices they are
manufacturing. Revenue for software licenses, professional and engineering services and training
is recognized upon performance, which includes delivery of a final product version and acceptance
by the customer. For post-contract customer support and fees associated with technical support,
revenue is deferred and recognized over the life of the contract as service is performed. Royalty
revenue is recognized when cash is received from the customer. Unearned post-contract customer
support and unearned nonrecurring engineering services revenue is included in deferred revenue on
the balance sheet.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. Research and development costs include
compensation, allocation of corporate costs, depreciation, utilities, professional services and
prototypes. Software development costs are expensed as incurred until the point that technological
feasibility and proven marketability of the product are established. To date, the time period
between the establishment of technological feasibility and completion of software development has
been short, and no significant development costs have been incurred during that period.
Accordingly, we have not capitalized any software development costs to date.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year
end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income. Income tax expense is equal to the tax payable
for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during
the period. Our only potentially dilutive common shares are those that result from dilutive common
stock options and shares purchased through the employee stock purchase plan.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (CONTINUED)
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the net income per
common share calculations (in thousands, except per common share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common
share weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
24,901 |
|
|
|
25,659 |
|
|
|
25,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per common
share adjusted weighted average shares |
|
|
25,183 |
|
|
|
26,242 |
|
|
|
26,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the treasury stock method to calculate the weighted-average shares used in the diluted
earnings per share computation. Under the treasury stock method, the proceeds from exercise of an
option, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that we have not yet
recognized, and the amount of estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if
any, when the option is exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current
period.
Stock options to purchase 3,109,829, 2,336,693 and 573,134 common shares at September 30, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common
share because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of common
shares and, therefore, their effect would be antidilutive.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We compute stock-based compensation using the modified prospective method of application.
This standard requires the recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange
for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the award. Under
this statement, we must measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an
award of equity instruments based upon the fair value of the award on the date of grant. This
cost must be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide the
service (usually the vesting period).
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Financial position and results of operations of our international subsidiaries are measured using
local currencies as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are
translated at the exchange rates in effect at the end of each reporting period. Statements of
operations accounts are translated at the weighted average rates of exchange prevailing during each
reporting period. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from
period to period are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
in stockholders equity. Gains and losses on foreign currency exchange transactions, as well as
translation gains or losses on transactions denominated in currencies other than an entitys
functional currency are reflected
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION (CONTINUED)
in the statement of operations. Net transaction gains and losses were recorded to other income
(expense) for fiscal 2009 and 2008 and were not significant. Net transaction gains and losses were
recorded to general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2007 and were immaterial. We have
not implemented a formal hedging strategy to reduce the risk of foreign currency translation
exposures.
USE OF ESTIMATES AND RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have evaluated for recognition and/or disclosure all events or transactions that occurred
through December 3, 2009, the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Our comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income, foreign currency translation
adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale marketable securities, which are
charged or credited to the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account in stockholders
equity.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards and provided guidance for
identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple deliverables
exist, and provided guidance for allocation and recognizing revenue based on those separate
deliverables. This guidance is expected to result in more multiple-deliverable arrangements being
separable than under current guidance. This guidance is effective for revenue arrangements entered
into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain
revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing
accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software
components that function together to deliver the products essential functionality shall be
excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly,
sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards
or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement
consideration for each element of the arrangement. This guidance is effective for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010.
Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS (CONTINUED)
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new standard on business combinations. This new standard
retained the fundamental requirements in the former standard that the acquisition method of
accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method) be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This
standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in
the business combination and established the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer
achieves control. The new standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree. This new standard also makes certain other modifications to the former standard and
is effective for business combinations that are consummated by us beginning October 1, 2009.
Early adoption is not permitted. We adopted this standard effective October 1, 2009 and this
standard could have a material impact on how we will identify, negotiate, and value future
acquisitions and how such acquisitions will affect our consolidated financial statements.
2. ACQUISITIONS
MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
On June 8, 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
(MobiApps), a developer of machine-to-machine (M2M) communications technology focusing on
satellite, cellular, and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions. MobiApps has locations in India,
Singapore and in the U.S. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreements, Digi
International acquired the U.S. assets located in Herndon, Virginia. In addition, we established
Digi Wireless Singapore Pte. Ltd. and Digi m2m Solutions India Private Limited, which acquired the
assets of MobiApps affiliate companies, located in Singapore and India, respectively. The
acquisition was a cash transaction for $3.0 million. An additional $0.5 million may be payable at
the end of fiscal 2010, contingent on the achievement of certain performance milestones.
The purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of the assets acquired, resulting in
tax-deductible goodwill of $1.7 million. We believe that the acquisition resulted in the
recognition of goodwill since MobiApps satellite, cellular and hybrid satellite/cellular solutions
will expand our wireless and mobile offerings.
MobiApps operating results are included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of
acquisition. The consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 reflects the allocation of
the purchase price to the assets acquired based on their estimated fair values at the date of
acquisition. The table below sets forth the final purchase price allocation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, including direct acquisition costs |
|
$ |
3,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
136 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Existing purchased and core technology |
|
|
800 |
|
License agreement |
|
|
400 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
The weighted average useful life for the total of all the identifiable intangibles listed
above is 5.7 years. The weighted average useful life for each identifiable intangible asset
class is as follows: existing purchased and core technology - 5.8 years and license agreement
- 5.5 years.
Useful lives for identifiable intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based
on the periods of time from which we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable
intangible assets. The identifiable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line
method which reflects the pattern at which the asset is consumed. We do not expect the above
intangible assets to have any significant residual value once they become fully amortized.
We have determined that the MobiApps acquisition is not material to our consolidated results of
operations or financial position. Therefore, pro forma financial information is not presented.
Sarian Systems, Ltd.
On April 28, 2008, we acquired Sarian Systems, Ltd. (Sarian), which merged into Digi
International Ltd. on October 1, 2009. Prior to the acquisition, Sarian was a privately held
corporation located in the United Kingdom. The total purchase price of $30.9 million was for
all of the outstanding ordinary shares of Sarian.
The purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. The purchase price allocation resulted in non-deductible goodwill of
$15.4 million and a charge of $1.9 million for acquired in-process research and development.
We believe that the acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because
Sarians wireless IP-based routing capability is highly complementary to our market approach
and significantly expands our wireless offering.
Sarians operating results are included in our consolidated results of operations from the
date of acquisition. The consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
reflect the allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The table below sets forth
the final purchase price allocation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, including direct acquisition costs |
|
$ |
30,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
4,055 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Existing purchased and core technology |
|
|
7,800 |
|
Existing customer relationships |
|
|
4,800 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
340 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
300 |
|
In-process research and development |
|
|
1,900 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
15,432 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities related to identifiable intangibles |
|
|
(3,707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average useful life for all the identifiable intangibles listed above is 7.1
years. The weighted average useful life for each identifiable intangible asset class is as
follows: existing purchased and core technology - 4.7 years, existing customer relationships
- 11.0 years, trade names - 8.5 years, and non-compete agreements - 3.0 years.
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
Useful lives for identifiable intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based on
the periods of time from which we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable intangible
assets. The identifiable intangible assets, other than customer relationships, are amortized using
the straight-line method which reflects the pattern at which the asset is consumed. Customer
relationships are amortized based upon an accelerated method following estimated cash flows
generated from the intangible asset, whereby more of the amortization is taken in the early years
rather than later years. We do not expect the above intangible assets to have any significant
residual value once they become fully amortized.
At the time of acquisition, Sarian had development projects in process associated with the IPV6,
Gate Array and VPN technologies. We estimated that $1.9 million of the purchase price represented
the fair value of acquired in-process research and development related to the products listed below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
IPV6 |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
Gate Array |
|
|
400 |
|
VPN technologies |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total in-process research and development |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
These products were under development, had a measurable percentage completed and a documented
expected life, had not yet reached technological feasibility, and had no alternative future uses.
This amount was expensed as a non-tax-deductible charge upon consummation of the acquisition.
We utilized the excess earnings method, a variation of the income approach, to determine the
estimated fair value of the acquired in-process research and development. The estimated values are
based upon the future cash flows to be generated by these in-process research and development
projects over the projected period. These estimates were based on the following assumptions:
|
|
|
The estimated revenues were based upon our estimate of revenue growth for each of the
products over the next ten fiscal years, using the assumption that all revenue recorded
after the ten year period will be generated from future technologies. |
|
|
|
|
The estimated operating expenses were based on consideration of historical selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales and Sarians projected
operating expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance research and development, defined as the research and development necessary
to sustain the existing technology and its revenue stream, was also included as an
operating expense. The estimated remaining cost to complete each in-process research and
development technology was also included in operating expenses. |
|
|
|
|
When applying the excess earnings method, the cash flows expected to be generated by an
asset are discounted to their present value equivalent using a rate of return that reflects
the relative risk of the investment, as well as the time value of money. This return,
known as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), is an overall rate based upon the
individual rates of return for invested capital (equity and interest-bearing debt). The
discount rate used in the excess earnings method was 35%. Premiums were added to the WACC
to account for the inherent risks in the development of the products, the risks of the
products being completed on schedule, and the risk of the eventual sales of the product
meeting the expectations of the Company. We used a 35% rate of return for the in-process
research and development projects. |
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
All of these acquired in-process research and development projects were completed. The estimates
described above are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the development process, and no
assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations have been prepared
as if the acquisition of Sarian had occurred as of the beginning of each of the periods presented
(in thousands, except per common share amounts). Pro forma adjustments include in each year
amortization of identifiable intangible assets and the $1.9 million charge related to acquired
in-process research and development associated with the Sarian acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
Year ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
192,734 |
|
|
$ |
183,905 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
|
$ |
17,205 |
|
Net income per common share, basic |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
Net income per common share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations are not necessarily indicative
of results that would have occurred had the Sarian acquisition occurred as of the beginning of each
of the periods presented above, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results that will be
obtained in the future.
Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc.
On July 23, 2008, we acquired Spectrum Design Solutions, Inc. (Spectrum), which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Digi International Inc. Prior to the acquisition, Spectrum was a privately held
Minneapolis-based corporation and performed wireless design services. The acquisition was a cash
merger for $10.0 million of which $4.0 million was paid on the acquisition date, $3.0 million will
be paid in January 2010, and the remaining $3.0 million will be paid in July 2011. These remaining
payments totaling $6.0 million were initially recorded as a liability on our consolidated balance
sheet at their present value, which was $5.5 million, on which interest will be accrued up until
the time of payment.
The purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. The purchase price allocation resulted in non-deductible goodwill of $5.5 million. We
believe that the acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill primarily because Spectrum can
provide a more complete Drop-in Networking solution to customers who will often need customized
gateways, connectware and application development support.
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
Spectrums operating results are included in our consolidated results of operations from the date
of acquisition. The consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 reflect the
allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The table below sets forth the final purchase
price allocation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, including direct acquisition costs |
|
$ |
4,067 |
|
Deferred payments Spectrum shareholders (present value of $6.0 million) |
|
|
5,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
9,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net tangible assets acquired |
|
$ |
283 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Existing purchased and core technology |
|
|
800 |
|
Existing customer relationships |
|
|
2,100 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
80 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
800 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average useful life for all the identifiable intangibles listed above is 8.5
years. The weighted average useful life for each identifiable intangible asset class is as
follows: existing purchased and core technology 5 years, existing customer relationships
11 to 13 years, trade names 5 years and non-compete agreements 2 to 4 years.
Useful lives for identifiable intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based
on the periods of time from which we expect to derive benefits from the identifiable
intangible assets. The identifiable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line
method which reflects the pattern at which the asset is consumed. We do not expect the above
intangible assets to have any significant residual value once they become fully amortized.
We have determined that the Spectrum acquisition was not material to our consolidated results of
operations or financial condition. Therefore, pro forma financial information is not presented.
FS Forth-Systeme GmbH/Sistemas Embebidos S.A.
Effective April 1, 2005, we acquired FS Forth-Systeme GmbH/Sistemas Embebidos S.A.
(collectively referred to as FS Forth) from Embedded Solutions AG of Germany. The purchase
price of $6.5 million in cash included contingent consideration of $0.8 million paid in
October 2006 and $0.9 million paid in October 2007 based on the achievement of milestones
identified in the merger agreement.
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable Intangible Assets
Amortized identifiable intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 are comprised of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
Net |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased and core technology |
|
$ |
46,583 |
|
|
$ |
(34,893 |
) |
|
$ |
11,690 |
|
|
$ |
46,660 |
|
|
$ |
(30,745 |
) |
|
$ |
15,915 |
|
License agreements |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
(2,464 |
) |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
(2,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Patents and trademarks |
|
|
9,292 |
|
|
|
(5,536 |
) |
|
|
3,756 |
|
|
|
8,906 |
|
|
|
(4,682 |
) |
|
|
4,224 |
|
Customer maintenance contracts |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
236 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
17,607 |
|
|
|
(7,334 |
) |
|
|
10,273 |
|
|
|
18,137 |
|
|
|
(5,472 |
) |
|
|
12,665 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
78,063 |
|
|
$ |
(51,186 |
) |
|
$ |
26,877 |
|
|
$ |
77,918 |
|
|
$ |
(43,886 |
) |
|
$ |
34,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Total |
2009 |
|
$ |
7,476 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
6,830 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
7,579 |
|
Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year |
|
Total |
2010 |
|
$ |
7,648 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
6,463 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
4,610 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
3,068 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance, October 1 |
|
$ |
86,578 |
|
|
$ |
66,817 |
|
Acquisition of MobiApps |
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Sarian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,432 |
|
Acquisition of Spectrum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, September 30 |
|
$ |
86,558 |
|
|
$ |
86,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
We have a single operating and reporting segment. Our revenues consist of products that are
in non-embedded and embedded product categories. Non-embedded products are connected
externally to a device or larger system to provide wired or wireless network connectivity or
port expansion, while embedded products are used by a product developer to build an electronic
device in which the product provides processing power, wired Ethernet, or wireless network
connectivity to that device. The products included in the non-embedded product category
include cellular routers, gateways, wireless communication adapters, console and serial
servers, USB connected products, remote display products, cameras and sensors, serial cards
and network management software. The products included in the embedded product category
include modules, chips, software and development tools, design services, satellite,
single-board computers and network interface cards. The following table provides revenue by
product categories (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Non-embedded |
|
$ |
91,262 |
|
|
$ |
98,442 |
|
|
$ |
98,879 |
|
Embedded |
|
|
74,666 |
|
|
|
86,614 |
|
|
|
74,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information in the following table provides revenue by the geographic location of the customer
for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
North America |
|
$ |
90,708 |
|
|
$ |
107,336 |
|
|
$ |
112,021 |
|
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
|
|
56,018 |
|
|
|
52,956 |
|
|
|
41,384 |
|
Asia countries |
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
|
19,672 |
|
|
|
15,597 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
4,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
165,928 |
|
|
$ |
185,056 |
|
|
$ |
173,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, equipment and improvements by geographic location (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
15,324 |
|
|
$ |
14,920 |
|
|
$ |
13,989 |
|
International, primarily Europe |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
5,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net property, equipment and improvements |
|
$ |
16,678 |
|
|
$ |
16,255 |
|
|
$ |
19,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.S. export sales comprised 32.5%, 34.8% and 31.3% of net sales for the years ended September
30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We had one customer whose accounts receivable balance comprised 10.2% of total accounts receivable
at September 30, 2009 for which multiple payments were in transit and received within three
business days of September 30, 2009. No single customer exceeded 10% of accounts receivable or
sales for any other period presented.
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. SELECTED BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, (in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
19,656 |
|
|
$ |
25,007 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,032 |
|
|
$ |
24,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
21,359 |
|
|
$ |
20,979 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
4,808 |
|
|
|
8,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,619 |
|
|
$ |
30,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
10,522 |
|
|
|
10,522 |
|
Improvements |
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
11,194 |
|
|
|
13,940 |
|
Purchased software |
|
|
10,788 |
|
|
|
10,680 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,848 |
|
|
|
41,614 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,170 |
|
|
|
25,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,678 |
|
|
$ |
16,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligation, current portion |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
Deferred gain on building sale short-term |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
Deferred income tax liability current |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,035 |
|
|
$ |
3,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in equipment at September 30, 2009 is $0.1 million of equipment under capital leases with
accumulated depreciation of $0.1 million.
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Our marketable securities consist of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government
municipal bonds. Prior to October 1, 2008, all marketable securities were classified as
held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost, except for a bond issued by the Lehman
Brothers (the Lehman Brothers Bond), which was carried at expected realizable value due to an
other-than-temporary impairment recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. We changed
our policy as of October 1, 2008 to account for our marketable securities as
available-for-sale on a prospective basis with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
separate component of stockholders equity. In addition, we have reclassified the Lehman
Brothers Bond as available-for-sale as we sold a portion of this bond in fiscal 2009, as
discussed further below.
On April 1, 2009, we adopted authoritative new guidance issued by FASB relating to interim
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. This standard requires disclosures about
the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value of financial instruments for
interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements and also requires those disclosures in
summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.
65
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
We analyze our available-for-sale investments for impairment on an ongoing basis. On April 1, 2009
we adopted new authoritative guidance issued by FASB relating to recognition and presentation of
other-than-temporary impairments. As a result of the adoption of this standard, we consider
factors in determining whether an unrealized loss is a temporary loss or an other-than-temporary
loss such as: (a) whether we have the intent to sell the security or (b) whether it is more likely
than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. We also
consider factors such as the length of time and extent to which the securities have been in an
unrealized loss position and the trend of any unrealized losses. During the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $1,014,900 on the Lehman Brothers
Bond with a par amount of $1,194,000. The resulting value of $179,100 for the security became its
new cost basis as of September 30, 2008. This other-than-temporary impairment reflected the
estimated decline in the value of this security precipitated by the bankruptcy of the securitys
issuer and is considered a credit loss and thus would remain in retained earnings. The impairment
charge was recorded as a temporary tax difference as we have sufficient capital gains in the
available carryback years to utilize the capital loss that will be realized when the bond is sold.
We sold a portion of the bond in fiscal 2009. The remaining value of the Lehman Brothers Bond as
of September 30, 2009 was $134,100. No additional other-than-temporary impairment charges for the
Lehman Brothers Bond were recorded for the year ended September 30, 2009 as there has not been any
significant change in the fair value assumptions utilized to calculate the impairment.
We obtain quoted market prices and trading activity for each security, where available, and review
the financial solvency of each security issuer and obtain other relevant information from our
investment advisors to estimate the fair value for each security in our investment portfolio. As
of September 30, 2009, 15 of our securities, of which 10 were certificates of deposit, were trading
below our amortized cost basis. Other than the impaired Lehman Brothers Bond, we determined each
decline in value to be temporary based upon the factors described above. We expect to realize the
fair value of these securities, plus accrued interest, either at the time of maturity or when the
security is sold.
Available-for-sale marketable securities are recorded at fair value on our balance sheet as of
September 30, 2009 and the unrealized gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss and were comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses (3) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds (2) |
|
$ |
4,236 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,254 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
10,025 |
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
8,023 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable securities |
|
|
22,281 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
22,311 |
|
Non-current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
27,388 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
27,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $263,883. |
|
(2) |
|
The remaining portion of the Lehman Brothers Bond is included in amortized cost at a fair value of $134,100. |
|
(3) |
|
The aggregate related fair value of securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2009 was $9,009,428. |
66
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES (CONTINUED)
Our held-to-maturity marketable securities were comprised of the following as of September 30, 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost (1) |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
55,628 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(2,771 |
) |
|
$ |
52,869 |
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
3,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current marketable securities |
|
|
59,337 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2,781 |
) |
|
|
56,568 |
|
Non-current marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds (2) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marketable securities |
|
$ |
59,516 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(2,781 |
) |
|
$ |
56,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in amortized cost and fair value is purchased and accrued interest of $967,258. |
|
(2) |
|
The Lehman Brothers Bond is included in amortized cost at a fair value of $179,100, net of the impairment charge
of $1,014,900 recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. |
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Beginning in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we adopted certain provisions of authoritative
guidance issued by FASB for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an
asset or liability has significantly decreased and also guidance on identifying certain
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly.
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the
measurement date. This standard also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair
value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from
independent sources. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors
market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based upon the best information
available in the circumstances. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement.
The hierarchy is broken down into three levels defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that
are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability. See the section below
titled Level 3 Valuation Techniques for further discussion of how we determine fair
value for investments classified as Level 3. |
Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
As of our effective date of October 1, 2008, fair value is now applied to financial assets, such as
certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and government municipal bonds, which are classified and
accounted for as available-
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)
for-sale. These items are stated at fair value at each reporting period; however, the definition
of fair value is now applied using the new guidance which requires us to use quoted market prices
in active markets (Level 1).
The following table provides information by level for financial assets that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009 Using: |
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
Quoted price in |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
value at |
|
|
active markets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
unobservable inputs |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
33,588 |
|
|
$ |
33,588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
9,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
10,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government municipal bonds |
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents and marketable
securities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
60,962 |
|
|
$ |
60,828 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents and marketable securities measured at fair value using quoted market prices are
classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Level 3 Valuation Techniques
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model
assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial assets also include certain investment
securities for which there is limited market activity or a decrease in the observability of market
pricing for these investments, such that the determination of fair value requires significant
judgment or estimation. The remaining portion of our Lehman Brothers Bond was valued at $134,100
primarily using broker pricing data (Level 3) that incorporate transaction details within an
inactive market as a baseline, as well as assumptions about liquidity and credit valuation
adjustments of marketplace participants at September 30, 2009.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of items
measured at fair value on a recurring basis that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) in
thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
179 |
|
Realized gain recorded in other income (expense) |
|
|
7 |
|
Sale of security |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
The use of different assumptions, applying different judgment to inherently subjective matters and
changes in future market conditions could result in significantly different estimates of fair value
of these securities, currently and in the future. The fair value of our securities could change
significantly based on changes in
market conditions and continued uncertainties in the credit markets. If these uncertainties
continue or if these securities experience credit rating downgrades, we may incur additional
impairment charges for other securities in our investment portfolio.
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES
In general, we warrant our products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under
normal use and service. The warranty periods range from 90 days to five years from the date of
receipt. We have the option to repair or replace products we deem defective due to material or
workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is
recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the
estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty
incidents and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty accrual.
The following table summarizes the activity associated with the product warranty accrual for the
years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal |
|
Balance at |
|
Warranties |
|
Settlements |
|
Balance at |
year |
|
October 1, |
|
issued |
|
made |
|
September 30, |
2009 |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
(856 |
) |
|
$ |
970 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
979 |
|
|
$ |
(920 |
) |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
$ |
(826 |
) |
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
We are not responsible for and do not warrant that customer software versions created by OEM
customers based upon our software source code will function in a particular way, conform to any
specifications, are fit for any particular purpose and we do not indemnify these customers from any
third party liability as it relates to or arises from any customization or modifications made by
the OEM customer.
9. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
On April 22, 2008, we entered into a short-term loan agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in
the amount of $25.0 million. This short-term loan was used to finance the Sarian acquisition
(see Note 2). Interest was based on a one-month fixed LIBOR rate at the first day of the loan
plus 0.30% until May 23, 2008, at which time the rate was changed to a daily LIBOR rate plus
0.30% and ranged between 2.41% and 3.20% from the date of the loan through May 29, 2008. The
total interest paid on the loan was $42,134. Per the terms of the agreement, payment of the
outstanding balance was due November 30, 2008; however, we had the option to prepay without
penalty. In May 2008, we repaid the entire $25.0 million utilizing the proceeds from the
sales of our marketable securities upon maturity.
10. RESTRUCTURING
On April 23, 2009, we announced a business restructuring to increase our focus on wireless
products and solutions that include hardware, software and services. The restructuring
included the closing of an engineering facility in Long Beach, California, and the relocation
and consolidation of the manufacturing facility in Davis, California to our Minneapolis,
Minnesota headquarters. We paid a lease cancellation fee for one of the leased facilities in
Davis and had vacated the facility as of September 30, 2009. We continue to maintain
non-manufacturing activities at the remaining leased facility in Davis, California. As a
result of these initiatives, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 we recorded a $2.0
million charge, which consisted of $1.8 million for employee termination costs for 86
positions and $0.2 million for contract termination fees and other relocation costs.
All 86 positions have been vacated as of September 30, 2009. The employee termination costs
include severance and the associated costs of continued medical benefits and outplacement
services. The other restructuring expenses include contract termination fees for non-renewal
of lease terms relating to one of the facilities in Davis, California and relocation expenses
for employees.
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. RESTRUCTURING (CONTINUED)
A summary of the restructuring charges and other activity within the restructuring accrual is
listed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance October 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining liability is mostly related to continued medical benefits that will be completed
and paid by the end of fiscal 2010.
11. INCOME TAXES
The components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,582 |
|
|
$ |
16,648 |
|
|
$ |
18,375 |
|
International |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
18,915 |
|
|
$ |
23,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the income tax provision are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
|
$ |
6,654 |
|
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
State |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
(1,829 |
) |
|
|
(1,983 |
) |
|
|
(688 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
6,564 |
|
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The net deferred tax liability at September 30 consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
Non-current deferred tax asset |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liability |
|
|
(4,331 |
) |
|
|
(7,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(1,524 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Uncollectible accounts and other reserves |
|
$ |
2,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Compensation costs |
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
(7,614 |
) |
|
|
(10,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(1,524 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, we have domestic tax credit carryforwards of $0.2 million the majority of
which will expire in 2013. We also have foreign tax credit carryforwards at September 30, 2009 of
$0.1 million, the majority of which will expire in 2013.
We have concluded that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized
based on future projected taxable income and the anticipated future reversal of deferred tax
liabilities. Our valuation allowance is minimal at September 30, 2009. The amount of the deferred
tax assets actually realized, however, could vary if there are differences in the timing or amount
of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or changes in the amounts of future
taxable income. If our future taxable income projections are not realized, an additional valuation
allowance would be required, and would be reflected as income tax expense at the time that any such
change in future taxable income is determined.
The reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to our effective income tax rate for
the years ended September 30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Statutory income tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefits |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Utilization of tax credits |
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Manufacturing deduction |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Foreign taxes |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
Research and development credit related to 2008 |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of tax contingency reserves |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
Non-deductible stock-based compensation |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
All of our unrecognized tax benefits are classified as a long-term liability as we do not expect
significant payments or receipts to occur over the next 12 months. A reconciliation of the
beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of October 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
Increases related to: |
|
|
|
|
Prior year income tax positions |
|
|
200 |
|
Current year income tax positions |
|
|
838 |
|
Decreases related to: |
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Expiration of the statute of limitations |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would affect the effective tax
rate is $3.4 million.
We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. During
the year ended September 30, 2009, we recognized less than $0.1 million in interest and penalties.
As of September 30, 2009, we have accrued $0.8 million in interest and penalties on our
consolidated balance sheet.
There are no tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease over the next 12 months.
During fiscal 2009, we reversed $0.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year and settlement of prior liabilities
under amnesty programs. We recorded an additional current discrete tax benefit of $0.5 million
resulting from the enactment on October 3, 2008 of the retroactive extension of the research and
development tax credit for activity from January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008. We also recorded
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2007 and 2008. The
aforementioned income tax benefits resulting from the reversal of income tax reserves and other
discrete tax benefits reduced the effective tax rate by 27 percentage points in fiscal 2009.
During fiscal 2008, we reversed $0.3 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year. We recorded an additional $0.2
million of discrete tax benefits as a result of a filing of a prior year tax return and adjustments
to actual for items reported on the tax returns for fiscal 2007.
During fiscal 2007, we reversed $3.6 million in income tax reserves primarily associated with the
closing of a German tax audit and the statutory closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year.
We had established tax reserves that were no longer required as a result of these events. In
addition, we also recorded discrete tax benefits of $0.7 million related to the filing of U.S.
amended tax returns, enactment of the extension of the research and development tax credit, and
adjustments to actual for items reported on the tax returns filed for fiscal 2006.
We operate in multiple tax jurisdictions both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Accordingly, we
must determine the appropriate allocation of income to each of these jurisdictions. This
determination requires us to make several estimates and assumptions. Tax audits associated with
the allocation of this income, and other complex issues, may require an extended period of time to
resolve and may result in adjustments to our income tax balances in those years that are material
to our consolidated financial position and results of operations. We are no longer subject to
income tax examination for taxable years prior to fiscal 2006 and 2005 in the case of
72
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
U.S. federal and non-U.S. income tax authorities, respectively, and for tax years generally before
fiscal 2005, in the case of state taxing authorities, consisting primarily of Minnesota and
California.
At September 30, 2009, we have approximately $6.4 million of accumulated undistributed earnings of
controlled foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely as of such date
pursuant to authoritative guidance issued by FASB related to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
and corporate joint ventures. Accordingly, no deferred tax has been provided on such earnings. If
the applicable earnings were remitted to us, applicable U.S. federal tax would be substantially
offset by available foreign tax credits.
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based awards are granted under the terms of the 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan as Amended and
Restated as of November 27, 2006 (the Omnibus Plan) which was ratified on January 22, 2007 at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as well as our Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated
as of November 27, 2006 (the Stock Option Plan) and Non-Officer Stock Option Plan as Amended
and Restated as of November 27, 2006 (the Non-Officer Plan), both of which expired during the
first quarter of fiscal 2007 (the Plans). Additional awards cannot be made under the Stock
Option Plan or the Non-Officer Plan. The authority to grant options under the Omnibus Plan
and set other terms and conditions rests with the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors.
The Stock Option Plan and the Non-Officer Plan include nonstatutory stock options (NSOs) and
the Stock Option Plan also includes incentive stock options (ISOs) to employees and others who
provide services to us, including consultants, advisers and directors. Options granted under
these plans generally vest over a four year service period and will expire if unexercised
after ten years from the date of grant. Share awards vest upon continued employment. The
exercise price for ISOs and non-employee director options granted under the Stock Option Plan
was set at the fair market value of our common stock based on the closing price on the date of
grant. The exercise price for NSOs granted under the Stock Option Plan or the Non-Officer
Plan was set by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and was set to the
exercise price based on the closing price on the date of grant.
The Omnibus Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 3,250,000 common shares in connection with awards
of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance units or stock awards.
Eligible participants include our employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors.
Awards may be granted under the Omnibus Plan until November 27, 2016. Options under the Omnibus
Plan can be granted as either ISOs or NSOs. The exercise price shall be determined by our
Compensation Committee but shall not be less than the fair market value of our common stock based
on the closing price on the date of grant.
Additionally, we have outstanding stock options under various plans assumed in connection with
our prior acquisition of NetSilicon, Inc. (the Assumed Plans). Additional awards cannot be
made by us under the Assumed Plans.
We recorded cash received from the exercise of stock options of $0.4 million, $1.7 million and $3.4
million during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation were $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.6 million during fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Upon exercise, we issue new shares of stock. The Plans have provisions
allowing employees to elect to pay their withholding obligation through share reduction. No
employees elected to pay income tax withholding obligations through share reduction during fiscal
2009, 2008 or 2007.
73
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
Also, we sponsor an Employee Stock Purchase Plan as Amended and Restated as of November 27, 2006
(the Purchase Plan), covering all domestic employees with at least 90 days of continuous service
and who are customarily employed at least 20 hours per week. The Purchase Plan allows eligible
participants the right to purchase common stock on a quarterly basis at the lower of 85% of the
market price at the beginning or end of each three-month offering period. The Purchase Plan was
ratified on January 22, 2007 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in which the Board of Directors
approved an amendment to increase the number of shares reserved for future purchases to the
Purchase Plan by 500,000 shares bringing the total number of shares to 1,750,000 shares of our
Common Stock that may be purchased under the plan. Employee contributions to the Purchase Plan
were $1.0 million in each of the fiscal years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007. Pursuant to the Purchase
Plan, 145,316, 117,162 and 105,077 common shares were issued to employees during the fiscal years
ended 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Shares are issued under the Purchase Plan from treasury
stock. As of September 30, 2009, 301,529 common shares were available for future issuances under
the Purchase Plan.
We use the modified prospective method of application. Under this method, compensation
expense is recognized both for (i) awards granted, modified or settled subsequent to September
30, 2005 and (ii) the nonvested portion of awards granted prior to October 1, 2005.
Compensation expense recorded during fiscal 2009 includes approximately $2.9 million related
to awards issued subsequent to September 30, 2005. In addition, compensation expense recorded
during fiscal 2009 includes approximately $0.3 million related to the current vesting portion
of awards issued prior to September 30, 2005.
Stock-based compensation expense is included in the consolidated results of operations as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation before income taxes |
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation after income taxes |
|
$ |
2,377 |
|
|
$ |
2,474 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory was immaterial as of September 30,
2009, 2008 and 2007.
74
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
A summary of options and common shares reserved for grant under the Plans and Assumed Plans are as
follows (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
for Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Value |
(1) |
Balances, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
4,808 |
|
|
$ |
11.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
815 |
|
|
$ |
8.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
10.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on our
closing stock price of $8.52 as of September 30, 2009, which would have been received by the option
holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. |
The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock
exceeds its exercise price. The total intrinsic value of all options exercised during each of the
twelve months ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0.2 million, $0.9 million and $2.4
million, respectively. The table below shows the weighted average fair value, which was determined
based upon the fair value of each option on the grant date utilizing the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and the related assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Fair value of options granted (in thousands) |
|
$2,667 |
|
$3,727 |
|
$3,641 |
Weighted average per option grant date fair value |
|
$3.27 |
|
$5.17 |
|
$5.58 |
Assumptions used for option grants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
1.57% - 2.41% |
|
2.53% - 3.41% |
|
4.44% - 4.80% |
Expected term |
|
4.5 - 5 years |
|
4 - 5 years |
|
3 - 5 years |
Expected volatility |
|
41% - 45% |
|
36% - 45% |
|
38% - 52% |
Weighted average volatility |
|
42% |
|
40% |
|
46% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
The fair value of each option award granted during the periods presented was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the table above. Expected
volatilities are based on the historical volatility of our stock. We use historical data to
estimate option exercise and employee termination information within the valuation model; separate
groups of grantees that have similar historical exercise behaviors are considered separately for
valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the vesting period and
historical information and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding. The risk-free rate used is the zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond rate in effect at the
time of the grant whose maturity equals the expected term of the option.
75
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
A summary of our non-vested options as of September 30, 2009 and changes during the twelve months
then ended is presented below (in thousands, except per common share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Number of |
|
Fair Value per |
|
|
Options |
|
Common Share |
Nonvested at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
5.09 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeiture rates. The pre-vesting forfeiture rate
used in fiscal 2009 was 2.0%. As of September 30, 2009 the total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements net of expected forfeitures was $4.7
million and the related weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is
approximately 2.7 years.
At September 30, 2009, the weighted average exercise price and remaining life of the stock options
are as follows (in thousands, except remaining life and exercise price):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted |
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
Range of |
|
Options |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Average |
|
Shares |
|
Average |
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
( In Years) |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Vested |
|
Exercise Price |
$2.19 - $6.00 |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
$6.01 - $8.00 |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.25 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
$ |
7.09 |
|
$8.01 - $9.00 |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.47 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
$ |
8.39 |
|
$9.01 - $11.00 |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
$ |
10.22 |
|
$11.01 - $13.00 |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
12.35 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
$ |
12.34 |
|
$13.01 - $14.00 |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.39 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
$ |
13.39 |
|
$14.01 - $16.00 |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
$ |
15.04 |
|
$16.01 - $27.69 |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
27.61 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
$ |
27.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.19 - $27.69 |
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.10 |
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of shares vested during fiscal 2009 was $3.2 million, $3.4 million in
fiscal 2008 and $2.8 million in fiscal 2007.
76
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
13. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE
Our Board of Directors has authorized 1,500,000 shares of our common stock for repurchase. During
fiscal 2008, we began to repurchase our common stock and purchased 471,200 shares for $5.1 million.
During fiscal 2009, we purchased an additional 893,162 shares for $6.6 million. As of September
30, 2009, 135,638 shares remain available for repurchase.
14. SALE AND LEASEBACK OF BUILDING
On February 18, 2008, we entered into a contract for the sale of our building in Dortmund,
Germany, and subsequent partial leaseback for a five year term (the Agreement). Upon the
closing of the transaction in March 2008, we initiated the leaseback of approximately 40% of
the property for a period of five years, with a renewal option for an additional five years.
The building was sold for 4.5 million Euros (equivalent to $6.9 million), resulting in a gain
on sale of 1.0 million Euros ($1.6 million). As a result of the leaseback, $1.5 million of
the gain on the sale was deferred and is being recognized ratably over the lease term as an
offset to rent expense. The remaining $0.1 million was recognized in the second quarter of
fiscal 2008 as a component of general and administrative expense. Of the total sale price,
4.2 million Euros ($6.5 million) was received during March 2008 and the remaining 0.3 million
Euros ($0.4 million) was received in April 2008. We were required, as part of the Agreement,
to deposit 0.3 million Euros ($0.4 million) into an interest-bearing bank account, which will
be refunded to us at the end of the lease term. This deposit was made during March 2008 and
is included as restricted cash in other noncurrent assets on our consolidated balance sheet as
of September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The lease expires in 2013 with future minimum payments as follows: In years 2010 through 2012
our yearly minimum lease payment is $0.4 million each year. In 2013, our minimum lease
payment will be $0.2 million.
15. SHARE RIGHTS PLAN
On April 22, 2008, our Board of Directors extended our share rights plan. Each right entitles its
holder to buy one one-hundredth of a share of a Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at an
exercise price of $60, subject to adjustment. The rights are not exercisable until a specified
distribution date as defined in the Share Rights Agreement. The Rights will expire on June 30,
2018, unless extended or earlier redeemed or exchanged by us as defined in the Share Rights
Agreement.
77
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. COMMITMENTS
We have entered into various operating lease agreements for office facilities and equipment, the
last of which expires in fiscal 2017. The office facility leases generally require us to pay a
pro-rata share of the lessors operating expenses. Certain operating leases contain escalation
clauses and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The following
schedule reflects future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,878 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,719 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,094 |
|
2014 |
|
|
613 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments required |
|
$ |
8,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following schedule shows the composition of total rental expense for all operating leases for
the years ended September 30 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Rentals |
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
Less: sublease rentals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
2,740 |
|
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We currently have a savings and profit sharing plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the Code), whereby eligible employees may contribute up to 25% of their pre-tax
earnings, not to exceed amounts allowed under the Code.
We provide a match of 100% on the first 3% of each employees bi-weekly contribution and a 50%
match on the next 2% of each employees bi-weekly contribution. In addition, we may make
contributions to the plan at the discretion of the Board of Directors. We provided matching
contributions of $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million in the fiscal years ended September
30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
18. CONTINGENCIES
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims relating to the initial
public offering (IPO) of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately 300 other public
companies. We acquired Net Silicon, Inc. on February 13, 2002. The complaint names us as a
defendant along with NetSilicon, certain of its officers and certain underwriters involved in
NetSilicons IPO, among numerous others, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO
prospectus and registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained
material misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters
in allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers. We believe that the
claims against the NetSilicon defendants are without merit and have defended the litigation
vigorously. Pursuant to a stipulation
between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed from the lawsuit, without prejudice, on
October 9, 2002.
78
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
18. CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
In June 2003, we elected to participate in a proposed settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in
this litigation. Had it been approved by the Court, this proposed settlement would have resulted
in a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims in the litigation against us and against any of the
other issuer defendants who elected to participate in the proposed settlement, together with the
current or former officers and directors of participating issuers who were named as individual
defendants. This proposed issuer settlement was conditioned on, among other things, a ruling by
the District Court that the claims against NetSilicon and against the other issuers who had agreed
to the settlement would be certified for class action treatment for purposes of the proposed
settlement, such that all investors included in the proposed classes in these cases would be bound
by the terms of the settlement unless an investor opted to be excluded from the settlement in a
timely and appropriate fashion.
On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in In
re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation that six purported class action lawsuits
containing allegations substantially similar to those asserted against us could not be certified as
class actions due, in part, to the Court of Appeals determination that individual issues of
reliance and knowledge would predominate over issues common to the proposed classes. On January 8,
2007, the plaintiffs filed a petition seeking rehearing en banc of this ruling. On
April 6, 2007 the Court of Appeals denied the plaintiffs petition for rehearing of the Courts
December 5, 2006 ruling. The Court of Appeals, however, noted that the plaintiffs remained free to
ask the District Court to certify classes different from the ones originally proposed which might
meet the standards for class certification that the Court of Appeals articulated in its December 5,
2006 decision. The plaintiffs have since moved for certification of different classes in the
District Court, and that motion remains pending. In light of the Court of Appeals December 5,
2006 decision regarding certification of the plaintiffs claims, the District Court entered an
order on June 25, 2007 terminating the proposed settlement between the plaintiffs and the issuers,
including NetSilicon.
On August 14, 2007, the plaintiffs filed amended complaints in six focus cases. On November 13,
2007, the issuer defendants and the underwriter defendants separately moved to dismiss the claims
against them in the amended complaints in the six focus cases. On March 26, 2008, the District
Court issued an order in which it denied in substantial part the motions to dismiss the amended
complaints in the six focus cases.
On February 25, 2009, the parties advised the District Court that they had reached an
agreement-in-principle to settle the litigation in its entirety. A stipulation of settlement was
filed with the District Court on April 2, 2009. On June 9, 2009, the District Court preliminarily
approved the proposed global settlement. Notice was provided to the class, and a settlement
fairness hearing, at which members of the class had an opportunity to object to the proposed
settlement, was held on September 10, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued an order
granting final approval to the settlement. Several objectors have since appealed the order
approving the settlement, and those appeals remain pending.
Under the settlement, our insurers are to pay the full amount of settlement share allocated to us,
and we would bear no financial liability beyond our insured basis. While there can be no guarantee
as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit, we expect that our liability insurance will be
adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the applicable deductible amount of
$250,000 per claim. As of September 30, 2009, we have an accrued liability for the anticipated
settlement of $300,000 which we believe is adequate and reflects the amount of loss that is
probable. We have recorded a receivable related to the insurance proceeds of $50,000 which
represents the anticipated settlement of $300,000 less a $250,000 deductible. In the event we
should have losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, such losses could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
79
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
18. CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
In addition to the matter discussed above, in the normal course of business, we are subject to
various claims and litigation, including patent infringement and intellectual property claims. Our
management expects that these various claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
19. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per common share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
Sept. 30 |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
41,361 |
|
|
$ |
40,085 |
|
|
$ |
44,470 |
|
|
$ |
40,012 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
21,248 |
|
|
|
19,169 |
|
|
|
21,437 |
|
|
|
19,411 |
|
Net income (1)(2) |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
44,574 |
|
|
$ |
43,070 |
|
|
$ |
46,995 |
|
|
$ |
50,417 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
23,895 |
|
|
|
23,177 |
|
|
|
24,857 |
|
|
|
25,940 |
|
Net income (1)(3) |
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
3,097 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2009 and 2008, we recorded discrete income tax benefits of $1.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Discrete
income tax benefits for fiscal 2009 were recorded of $0.4 million in the first quarter, $0.5 million in the third quarter and
$0.3 million in the fourth quarter related to the reversal of previously established income tax reserves, the resolution of
of certain state tax matters and the closing of a prior tax year. Discrete income tax benefits for fiscal 2008 were
recorded of $0.2 million in the third quarter and $0.3 million in the fourth quarter related to the reversal of income
tax reserves associated with the closing of a prior U.S. federal and state tax year. |
|
(2) |
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a $2.0 million pre-tax charge ($1.3 million after tax) related to a
business restructuring. |
|
(3) |
|
During the third quarter of fiscal 2008, we incurred a $1.9 million pre-tax charge with no related income tax benefit for
in-process research and development associated with the acquisition of Sarian. |
20. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On October 6, 2009, the District Court issued an order granting final approval to the settlement
relating to the claims filed regarding the IPO of our subsidiary NetSilicon, Inc. and approximately
300 other public companies (see Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). Several
objectors have since appealed the order approving the settlement, and those appeals remain pending.
80
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30,
2009 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, we
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30,
2009. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009
has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
as stated in their report which appears in Item 8 of this report.
On June 8, 2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of MobiApps Holdings Private Limited
(MobiApps). MobiApps, whose assets represented 0.6% of total consolidated assets as of September
30, 2009 and whose total net sales represented 0.2% of total consolidated net sales for the year
ended September 30, 2009, was acquired in a purchase business combination and was excluded from our
September 30, 2009 assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with
the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during
the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
81
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information required by this item relating
to our executive officers is included under the caption Executive Officers of the Registrant in
Part I of this report.
Code of Ethics
We adopted a code of ethics within the meaning of Rule 406 of Regulation S-K, which is applicable
to our senior financial management, including specifically our principal executive officer,
principal chief financial officer and controller. A copy of this code of ethics is included as an
exhibit to this report. We intend to satisfy our disclosure obligations regarding any amendment
to, or a waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our website
at www.digi.com. We also have a code of conduct that applies to all directors, officers and
employees, a copy of which is available through our website (www.digi.com) under the About us
Investor Relations Corporate Governance caption.
82
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules of the Company
|
|
1. |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years
ended
September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and
Comprehensive
Income for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
2. |
|
Schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
3. |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2(a)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, Dove Sub Inc. and NetSilicon,
Inc. dated as of October 30, 2001 (excluding schedules and exhibits which the Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request)
(1) |
|
|
|
2(b)
|
|
Purchase and assignment contract dated March 20, 2005 between Embedded Solutions
AG, Klaus Flesch, Angelika Flesch and Digi International GmbH (excluding schedules and
exhibits which the Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request) (2) |
|
|
|
2(c)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Digi International Inc., Karat Sub Inc. and
Z-World, Inc. dated as of May 26, 2005 (excluding schedules and exhibits, which the
Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request) (3) |
|
|
|
2(d)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Digi International Inc., Ocean Acquisition Sub
Inc. and MaxStream, Inc. dated as of July 27, 2006 (excluding schedules and exhibits
which the Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request) (4) |
|
|
|
2(e)
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2008 among Digi International
Limited, a subsidiary of Digi International Inc., and all of the shareholders of
Sarian Systems Limited (excluding schedules and exhibits which the Registrant
agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request) (5) |
83
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (6) |
|
|
|
3(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, as amended (7) |
|
|
|
4(a)
|
|
Share Rights Agreement, dated as of April 22, 2008, between the Company and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent (8) |
|
|
|
4(b)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Powers, Designations, Preferences and
Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares (9) |
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated as of November
27, 2006* (10) |
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Form of indemnification agreement with directors and officers of the Company*
(11) |
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Subramanian Krishnan dated March 26, 1999*
(12) |
|
|
|
10(c)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Subramanian Krishnan dated February
5, 2001* (13) |
|
|
|
10(d)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Joseph T. Dunsmore dated September
27, 2006* (14) |
|
|
|
10(e)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended and Restated,
of the Company as of November 27, 2006, as approved by stockholders on January 22,
2007*(15) |
|
|
|
10(f)
|
|
Digi International Inc. 2000 Omnibus Stock Plan as Amended and Restated
as of November 27, 2006, as approved by stockholders on January 22, 2007* (16) |
|
|
|
10(g)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, as Amended and
Restated as of November 27, 2006 (17) |
|
|
|
10(h)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Director Stock Option Plan
(18) |
|
|
|
10(i)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive and Non-Qualified
Stock Option Plan (19) |
|
|
|
10(j)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (20) |
|
|
|
10(k)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and Terms
and Conditions of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (Digi International Inc.
Stock Option Plan)* (21) |
|
|
|
10(l)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft, dated February 4,
2003* (22) |
|
|
|
10(l)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft dated July
30, 2007* (23) |
84
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10(m)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Joel K. Young dated July 30, 2007* (24) |
|
|
|
10(n)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option Agreement and Terms
and Conditions of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement (Digi International Inc.
2000 Omnibus Stock Plan)* (25) |
|
|
|
10(o)
|
|
English Language Summary of Sale and Leaseback Agreement dated February
18, 2008 between Digi International GmbH and Deutsche Structured Finance GmbH &
Co. Alphard KG. (26) |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics (27) |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney |
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this
Form 10-K.
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File no. 333-74118). |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Companys Form 8-K dated May 26, 2005 (File no.
0-17972). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Companys Form 8-K dated July 27, 2006 (File
no. 0-17972). |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (File No. 1-34033). |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 1993 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
8-A filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033). |
85
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED)
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
8-A filed on April 25, 2008 (File No. 1-34033). |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File no. 33-30725). |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e)(i) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2000 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated February 13, 2002 (File no. 333-82672). |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated February 13, 2002 (File no. 333-82670). |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
dated February 13, 2002 (File no. 333-82668). |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 8-K dated September 13, 2004
(File no. 0-17972). |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(24) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (File no. 0-17972). |
|
(25) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
86
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (CONTINUED)
(26) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (File no. 1-34033). |
|
(27) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2003 (File no. 0-17972). |
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
December 3, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 3, 2009 |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
December 3, 2009 |
/s/ Subramanian Krishnan
|
|
|
Subramanian Krishnan |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
GUY C. JACKSON
KENNETH E. MILLARD
AHMED NAWAZ
A majority of the Board of Directors*
WILLIAM N. PRIESMEYER
BRADLEY J. WILLIAMS
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this document on behalf of each
of the above named directors of the Registrant pursuant to Powers of Attorney duly executed by such
persons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 3, 2009 |
/s/ Joseph T. Dunsmore
|
|
|
Joseph T. Dunsmore |
|
|
Attorney-in-fact |
|
88
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(Decrease) to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
beginning |
|
costs and |
|
|
|
|
|
end of |
Description |
|
of period |
|
expenses |
|
Deductions |
|
period |
|
Valuation account doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
72 |
(1) |
|
$ |
624 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
(1) |
|
$ |
697 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
(1) |
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for future returns and pricing adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
(264 |
) |
|
$ |
47 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
199 |
(2) |
|
$ |
1,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation account inventory reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
(3) |
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,049 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
842 |
(3) |
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,580 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
(3) |
|
$ |
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollectible accounts charged against allowance, net of recoveries |
|
(2) |
|
Adjustments and recoveries |
|
(3) |
|
Scrapped inventory charged against allowance |
89
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
Page |
2(a)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
among the Company, Dove Sub
Inc. and NetSilicon, Inc.
dated as of October 30, 2001
(excluding schedules and
exhibits which the Registrant
agrees to furnish
supplementally to the
Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
2(b)
|
|
Purchase and assignment
contract dated March 20, 2005
between Embedded Solutions
AG, Klaus Flesch, Angelika
Flesch and Digi International
GmbH (excluding schedules and
exhibits which the Registrant
agrees to furnish
supplementally to the
Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
2(c)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
among Digi International
Inc., Karat Sub Inc. and
Z-World, Inc. dated as of May
26, 2005 (excluding schedules
and exhibits, which the
Registrant agrees to furnish
supplementally to the
Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
2(d)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
among Digi International
Inc., Ocean Acquisition Sub
Inc. and MaxStream, Inc.
dated as of July 27, 2006
(excluding schedules and
exhibits which the Registrant
agrees to furnish
supplementally to the
Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
2(e)
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement
dated April 28, 2008 among
Digi International Limited, a
subsidiary of Digi
International Inc., and all
of the shareholders of Sarian
Systems Limited (excluding
schedules and exhibits which
the Registrant agrees to
furnish supplementally to the
Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company,
as amended
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(b)
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws
of the Company, as amended
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4(a)
|
|
Share Rights Agreement, dated
as of April 22, 2008, between
the Company and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4(b)
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated
Certificate of Powers,
Designations, Preferences and
Rights of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred
Shares
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(a)
|
|
Digi International Inc. Stock
Option Plan as Amended and
Restated as of November 27,
2006
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(b)
|
|
Form of indemnification
agreement with directors and
officers of the Company
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(c)
|
|
Agreement between the Company
and Subramanian Krishnan
dated March 26, 1999
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(c)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement
between the Company and
Subramanian Krishnan dated
February 5, 2001
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(d)
|
|
Employment Agreement between
the Company and Joseph T.
Dunsmore dated September 27,
2006
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(e)
|
|
Digi International Inc.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
as Amended and Restated, of
the Company as of November
27, 2006, as approved by
stockholders on January 22,
2007
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(f)
|
|
Digi International Inc. 2000
Omnibus Stock Plan as Amended
and Restated as of November
27, 2006, as approved by
stockholders on January 22,
2007
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(g)
|
|
Digi International Inc.
Non-Officer Stock Option
Plan, as Amended and Restated
as of November 27, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(h)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1998 Director Stock
Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
90
EXHIBIT INDEX (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
Page |
10(i)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Incentive
and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(j)
|
|
NetSilicon, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(k)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option
Agreement and Terms and Conditions of Nonstatutory
Stock Option Agreement (Digi International Inc. Stock
Option Plan)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(l)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Lawrence A. Kraft,
dated February 4, 2003
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(l)(i)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement between the Company and Lawrence
A. Kraft dated July 30, 2007
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(m)
|
|
Agreement between the Company and Joel K. Young dated
July 30, 2007
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(n)
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Option
Agreement and Terms and Conditions of Nonstatutory
Stock Option Agreement (Digi International Inc. 2000
Omnibus Stock Plan)
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10(o)
|
|
English Language Summary of Sale and Leaseback
Agreement dated February 18, 2008 between Digi
International GmbH and Deutsche Structured Finance GmbH
& Co. Alphard KG.
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Powers of Attorney
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31(a)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
31(b)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
Filed Electronically |
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
Filed Electronically |
91