e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file
no. 001-13831
Quanta Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2851603
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1360 Post
Oak Blvd.
Suite 2100
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip
code)
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
(713) 629-7600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
209,171,196 shares of Common Stock were outstanding as of
November 3, 2009. As of the same date, 662,293 shares
of Limited Vote Common Stock were outstanding.
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
1
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437,901
|
|
|
$
|
584,038
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $8,802 and $9,766
|
|
|
795,251
|
|
|
|
663,277
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
54,379
|
|
|
|
62,353
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
25,813
|
|
|
|
31,920
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
72,063
|
|
|
|
61,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,385,407
|
|
|
|
1,402,960
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$330,070 and $373,122
|
|
|
635,456
|
|
|
|
692,543
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
33,479
|
|
|
|
31,647
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$57,215 and $72,475
|
|
|
140,717
|
|
|
|
131,053
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,363,100
|
|
|
|
1,375,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,558,159
|
|
|
$
|
3,634,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
400,253
|
|
|
|
338,586
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
50,390
|
|
|
|
51,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
451,798
|
|
|
|
390,088
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, net of discount of $21,475 and
$18,257
|
|
|
122,275
|
|
|
|
125,493
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
83,861
|
|
|
|
100,836
|
|
Insurance and other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
217,851
|
|
|
|
193,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
875,785
|
|
|
|
810,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.00001 par value, 300,000,000 shares
authorized, 199,317,237 and 200,665,654 shares issued and
196,928,203 and 198,067,674 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Limited Vote Common Stock, $.00001 par value,
3,345,333 shares authorized, 662,293 shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,803,836
|
|
|
|
2,836,051
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(86,326
|
)
|
|
|
20,731
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,956
|
)
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
Treasury stock, 2,389,034 and 2,597,980 common shares, at cost
|
|
|
(32,182
|
)
|
|
|
(35,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,682,374
|
|
|
|
2,822,869
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,682,374
|
|
|
|
2,823,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,558,159
|
|
|
$
|
3,634,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands, except per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,053,355
|
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,858,679
|
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
Cost of services (including depreciation)
|
|
|
867,789
|
|
|
|
633,166
|
|
|
|
2,390,546
|
|
|
|
1,930,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
185,566
|
|
|
|
147,628
|
|
|
|
468,133
|
|
|
|
402,541
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
80,126
|
|
|
|
71,018
|
|
|
|
227,134
|
|
|
|
217,591
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,998
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
29,464
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
96,442
|
|
|
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
211,535
|
|
|
|
169,690
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,837
|
)
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
(29,153
|
)
|
|
|
(8,437
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
8,105
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
88,551
|
|
|
|
69,276
|
|
|
|
190,893
|
|
|
|
164,126
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
36,614
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
79,817
|
|
|
|
45,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
51,937
|
|
|
|
63,956
|
|
|
|
111,076
|
|
|
|
119,090
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
51,937
|
|
|
$
|
63,436
|
|
|
$
|
111,076
|
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
173,007
|
|
|
|
198,608
|
|
|
|
172,168
|
|
|
|
198,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
203,930
|
|
|
|
205,224
|
|
|
|
196,783
|
|
|
|
198,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
51,937
|
|
|
$
|
63,956
|
|
|
$
|
111,076
|
|
|
$
|
119,090
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
19,806
|
|
|
|
20,574
|
|
|
|
57,986
|
|
|
|
60,537
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
8,998
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
29,464
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
4,731
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Amortization of deferred revenues
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
|
|
(3,397
|
)
|
|
|
(6,886
|
)
|
|
|
(10,316
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
4,230
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
Provision for insurance receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
8,277
|
|
|
|
28,764
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
33,346
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,043
|
|
|
|
4,969
|
|
|
|
12,402
|
|
|
|
14,635
|
|
Tax impact of stock-based equity awards
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(2,625
|
)
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
Non-cash (gain) loss on foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of non-cash
transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(139,659
|
)
|
|
|
75,205
|
|
|
|
(234,316
|
)
|
|
|
136,158
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
10,624
|
|
|
|
(12,560
|
)
|
|
|
7,118
|
|
|
|
(7,096
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
(3,391
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(5,545
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
10,308
|
|
|
|
(9,760
|
)
|
|
|
9,886
|
|
|
|
(7,496
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other non-current
liabilities
|
|
|
33,193
|
|
|
|
(48,792
|
)
|
|
|
55,910
|
|
|
|
(78,886
|
)
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
|
|
(14,271
|
)
|
|
|
540
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
16,816
|
|
|
|
107,959
|
|
|
|
50,118
|
|
|
|
278,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
2,058
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
11,122
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
Additions of property and equipment
|
|
|
(51,776
|
)
|
|
|
(36,012
|
)
|
|
|
(164,925
|
)
|
|
|
(120,852
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(4,819
|
)
|
|
|
(14,148
|
)
|
|
|
(27,728
|
)
|
|
|
(14,148
|
)
|
Cash paid for developed technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(54,537
|
)
|
|
|
(48,085
|
)
|
|
|
(196,104
|
)
|
|
|
(130,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from other long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
Repayments of convertible subordinated notes
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on other long-term debt
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(1,643
|
)
|
|
|
(3,376
|
)
|
Tax impact of stock-based equity awards
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
7,579
|
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(37,134
|
)
|
|
|
60,487
|
|
|
|
(138,407
|
)
|
|
|
146,263
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
|
|
(2,245
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
304,791
|
|
|
|
524,356
|
|
|
|
407,081
|
|
|
|
437,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
266,429
|
|
|
$
|
584,038
|
|
|
$
|
266,429
|
|
|
$
|
584,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (paid) received during the period for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
(148
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,931
|
)
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
(25,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(60,933
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,405
|
)
|
Income tax refunds
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND ORGANIZATION:
|
Quanta Services, Inc. (Quanta) is a leading national provider of
specialized contracting services, offering
end-to-end
network solutions to the electric power, natural gas and oil,
telecommunications and cable television industries. Effective
during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Quanta began
reporting its results under four reportable segments:
(1) Electric Power Infrastructure Services,
(2) Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services,
(3) Telecommunications Infrastructure Services and
(4) Fiber Optic Licensing.
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment
The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the electric
power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power
transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities
and the installation of smart grid technology on
electric power networks along with other engineering and
technical services to customers in this segment. Services also
performed by this segment include design and installation of
wind turbine facilities and solar arrays and related switchyards
and transmission networks for renewable power generation
sources. To a lesser extent, this segment also provides services
such as the design, installation, maintenance and repair of
commercial and industrial wiring, installation of traffic
networks and the installation of cable and control systems for
light rail lines.
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
The Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment
provides comprehensive network solutions to customers involved
in the transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline
products. Services performed by the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of natural gas and oil
transmission and distribution systems and related trenching and
directional boring services. In addition, this segment provides
pipeline protection services and performs pipeline integrity and
rehabilitation services. To a lesser extent, this segment
designs, installs and maintains airport fueling systems as well
as water and sewer infrastructure.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment
The Telecommunications Infrastructure Services segment
predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions to
customers in the telecommunications and cable television
industries. Services performed by the Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of fiber optic, copper and
coaxial cable networks used for video, data and voice
transmission. In addition, services include the design and
installation of wireless communications towers and switching
systems. To a lesser extent, services provided under this
segment include cable locating, splicing and testing of fiber
optic networks and residential installation of fiber optic
cabling.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment
The Fiber Optic Licensing segment designs, procures, constructs
and maintains fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to Quantas
customers pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with lease
terms from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain
renewal options. Under those agreements, customers are provided
the right to use a portion of the capacity of a fiber optic
facility, with the facility owned and maintained by Quanta. The
Fiber Optic Licensing segment services educational and
healthcare institutions, large industrial and financial services
customers and other entities with high bandwidth
telecommunication needs. The telecommunication services provided
through this segment are subject to regulation by the Federal
Communications Commission and certain state public utility
commissions.
5
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Acquisitions
In the third quarter of 2009, Quanta made two acquisitions of
businesses that predominately provide electric power services,
which have been reflected in Quantas consolidated
financial statements as of their respective acquisition dates.
On October 1, 2009, Quanta acquired, through a merger
transaction (the Merger), all of the outstanding stock of Price
Gregory Services, Incorporated (Price Gregory). In connection
with the Merger, Quanta issued approximately 10.9 million
shares of Quanta common stock valued at approximately
$231.8 million and paid approximately $95.8 million in
cash to the stockholders of Price Gregory. As the transaction
was effective October 1, 2009, the results of Price Gregory
will be included in the consolidated financial statements
beginning on such date. Price Gregory provides natural gas and
oil transmission pipeline infrastructure services in North
America, specializing in the construction of large diameter
transmission pipelines. Price Gregorys financial results
will generally be included in Quantas Natural Gas and
Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment.
Changes
in Accounting Principles
On July 1, 2009, Quanta adopted ASC 105, Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, which establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the
source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the
FASB to be used by non-governmental entities in the preparation
of financial statements presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). The
Codification reorganized the pre-Codification GAAP into
approximately 90 accounting topics. References to accounting
principles in the notes to Quantas consolidated financial
statements included in this report have been changed to reflect
the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) references resulting
from the Codification.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2008 and condensed consolidated statements of operations and
cash flows for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 have been retrospectively restated, as
discussed in Note 3, to reflect the impact of the adoption
on January 1, 2009 of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Staff Position (FSP) APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement) (FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
470-20,
Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options) and FSP
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (ASC
260, Earnings Per Share).
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Quanta include the
accounts of Quanta and its wholly owned subsidiaries, which are
also referred to as its operating units. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. Unless the context requires otherwise, references
to Quanta include Quanta and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Information
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote
disclosures, normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to those rules and regulations. Quanta believes that
the disclosures made are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to fairly state the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows with respect to the interim
consolidated financial statements have been
6
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
included. The results of operations for the interim periods are
not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal
year. The results of Quanta have historically been subject to
significant seasonal fluctuations.
Quanta recommends that these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Quanta
and its subsidiaries included in Quantas Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with
the SEC on March 2, 2009.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management in
determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist
as of the date the financial statements are published and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses recognized during the
periods presented. Quanta reviews all significant estimates
affecting its consolidated financial statements on a recurring
basis and records the effect of any necessary adjustments prior
to their publication. Judgments and estimates are based on
Quantas beliefs and assumptions derived from information
available at the time such judgments and estimates are made.
Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are
inherent in the preparation of financial statements. Estimates
are primarily used in Quantas assessment of the allowance
for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, useful lives of
assets, fair value assumptions in analyzing goodwill, other
intangibles and long-lived asset impairments, valuation of
derivative contracts, purchase price allocations, liabilities
for self-insured claims, convertible debt, revenue recognition
for construction contracts and fiber optic licensing,
share-based compensation, provision for income taxes and the
calculation of uncertain tax positions.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years
financial statements to conform to classifications used in the
current year.
Revision
of Previously Issued Financial Statements
During the third quarter of 2009, Quanta revised its
December 31, 2008 balance sheet for the correction of
certain errors identified in its deferred tax asset and
liability accounts during the years 2000 through 2004. These
items were identified in connection with Quantas 2009
analysis of its tax basis balance sheet, whereby Quanta
determined that certain deferred tax asset and liability
accounts related primarily to goodwill impairments and certain
bad debt expense transactions were misstated. The cumulative
impact of these items from the period January 1, 2005
through December 31, 2008 was an understatement of deferred
tax assets, an overstatement of deferred tax liabilities, an
overstatement of accumulated deficit and an understatement of
total stockholders equity. Quanta evaluated the impact of
these items under the guidance in
ASC 250-10
(SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99,
Materiality,) on each of the years affected
between 2000 and 2004 and on a cumulative basis for all prior
periods subsequent to 2004 and through December 31, 2008
and concluded the items were not material to any such periods.
Management also evaluated the impact of correcting these items
through a cumulative adjustment to Quantas 2009 financial
statements and concluded that the impact would have been
material to its interim results for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009. As a result of these
evaluations and based on the guidance within
ASC 250-10
(SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements
when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements,) management has revised
7
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
its previously issued financial statements to reflect the
cumulative impact of this correction. The following table
presents the impact of this revision on Quantas
December 31, 2008 balance sheet (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported (a)
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
As Revised
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
68,147
|
|
|
$
|
3,916
|
|
|
$
|
72,063
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,554,243
|
|
|
|
3,916
|
|
|
|
3,558,159
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
91,104
|
|
|
|
(7,243
|
)
|
|
|
83,861
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
883,028
|
|
|
|
(7,243
|
)
|
|
|
875,785
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(97,485
|
)
|
|
|
11,159
|
|
|
|
(86,326
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,671,215
|
|
|
$
|
11,159
|
|
|
$
|
2,682,374
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts displayed as reported reflect the impact of
the adoption of FSP APB
14-1. |
The revisions described above will be reflected in Quantas
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009, which will be included in Quantas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Quanta had cash and cash equivalents of $437.9 million and
$584.0 million as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009. Cash consisting of interest-bearing
demand deposits is carried at cost, which approximates fair
value. Quanta considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents, which are carried at fair value. At
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, cash
equivalents were $399.1 million and $534.0 million,
which consisted primarily of money market mutual funds and
investment grade commercial paper and are discussed further in
Fair Value Measurements below. As of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, cash and
cash equivalents held in domestic bank accounts was
approximately $433.7 million and $576.9 million, and
cash and cash equivalents held in foreign bank accounts was
approximately $4.2 million and $7.1 million.
Current
and Long-term Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
Quanta provides an allowance for doubtful accounts when
collection of an account or note receivable is considered
doubtful, and receivables are written off against the allowance
when deemed uncollectible. Inherent in the assessment of the
allowance for doubtful accounts are certain judgments and
estimates including, among others, the customers access to
capital, the customers willingness or ability to pay,
general economic and market conditions and the ongoing
relationship with the customer. Under certain circumstances such
as foreclosures or negotiated settlements, Quanta may take title
to the underlying assets in lieu of cash in settlement of
receivables. Material changes in Quantas customers
business or cash flows, which may be further impacted by the
current financial crisis and volatility of the markets, could
affect its ability to collect amounts due from them. As of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, Quanta had
total allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately
$8.8 million and $9.8 million. Should customers
experience financial difficulties or file for bankruptcy, or
should anticipated recoveries relating to receivables in
existing bankruptcies or other workout situations fail to
materialize, Quanta could experience reduced cash flows and
losses in excess of current allowances provided.
The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to
retainage provisions in certain contracts will be due upon
completion of the contracts and acceptance by the customer.
Based on Quantas experience with similar contracts in
recent years, the majority of the retention balances at each
balance sheet date will be collected within the subsequent
fiscal year. Current retainage balances as of December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2009 were approximately
$101.1 million and $105.1 million and are included in
accounts receivable. Retainage balances with settlement dates
beyond the next twelve months are included in other assets, net,
and as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009
were $6.0 million and $2.2 million.
8
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Within accounts receivable, Quanta recognizes unbilled
receivables in circumstances such as when: revenues have been
earned and recorded but the amount cannot be billed under the
terms of the contract until a later date; costs have been
incurred but are yet to be billed under cost-reimbursement type
contracts; or amounts arise from routine lags in billing (for
example, work completed one month but not billed until the next
month). These balances do not include revenues accrued for work
performed under fixed-price contracts as these amounts are
recorded as costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
on uncompleted contracts. At December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, the balances of unbilled receivables
included in accounts receivable were approximately
$122.9 million and $119.4 million.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Quanta has recorded goodwill in connection with various of its
acquisitions. Goodwill is subject to an annual assessment for
impairment using a two-step fair value-based test, which Quanta
performs at the operating unit level. Quanta has determined
that, based on its cash flow structure and its organizational
structure, its individual operating units represent its
reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill
impairments. This assessment is performed annually at year-end,
or more frequently if events or circumstances exist which
indicate that goodwill may be impaired. For instance, a decrease
in Quantas market capitalization below book value, a
significant change in business climate or a loss of a
significant customer, among other things, may trigger the need
for interim impairment testing of goodwill associated with one
or all of its reporting units. The first step of the two-step
fair value-based test involves comparing the fair value of each
of Quantas reporting units with its carrying value,
including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed. The second
step compares the carrying amount of the reporting units
goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the
implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount,
an impairment loss would be recorded as a reduction to goodwill
with a corresponding charge to operating expense.
Quanta determines the fair value of its reporting units using a
weighted combination of the discounted cash flow, market
multiple and market capitalization valuation approaches, with
heavier weighting on the discounted cash flow method, as in
managements opinion, this method currently results in the
most accurate calculation of a reporting units fair value.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment
and the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such
estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates,
operating margins, discount rates, weighted average costs of
capital and future market conditions, among others. Quanta
believes the estimates and assumptions used in its impairment
assessments are reasonable and based on available market
information, but variations in any of the assumptions could
result in materially different calculations of fair value and
determinations of whether or not an impairment is indicated.
Under the discounted cash flow method, Quanta determines fair
value based on the estimated future cash flows of each reporting
unit, discounted to present value using risk-adjusted industry
discount rates, which reflect the overall level of inherent risk
of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside investor
would expect to earn. Year one cash flows are derived from
budgeted amounts and operating forecasts, both of which are
evaluated by management. Subsequent period cash flows are
developed for each reporting unit using growth rates that
management believes are reasonably likely to occur along with a
terminal value derived from the reporting units earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
The EBITDA multiples for each reporting unit are based on
trailing twelve-month comparable industry data.
Under the market multiple and market capitalization approaches,
Quanta determines the estimated fair value of each of its
reporting units by applying transaction multiples to each
reporting units projected EBITDA and then averaging that
estimate with similar historical calculations using either a one
or two year average. For the market capitalization approach,
Quanta adds a reasonable control premium, which is estimated as
the premium that would be received in a sale of the reporting
unit in an orderly transaction between market participants.
9
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The projected cash flows and estimated levels of EBITDA by
reporting unit were used to determine fair value under the three
approaches discussed herein. The following table presents the
significant estimates used by management in determining the fair
values of Quantas reporting units at December 31,
2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Providing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predominantly
|
|
Operating Units
|
|
Operating Unit
|
|
|
Electric Power and
|
|
Providing
|
|
Providing
|
|
|
Natural Gas and
|
|
Predominantly
|
|
Fiber Optic
|
|
|
Pipeline Services
|
|
Telecommunication Services
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Years of cash flows before terminal value
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
N/A
|
|
15
|
Discount rates
|
|
14%
|
|
14% to 15%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
N/A
|
|
15%
|
EBITDA multiples
|
|
7.0 to 9.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
5.0 to 6.0
|
|
N/A
|
|
10.0
|
Weighting of three approaches:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flows
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
N/A
|
|
90%
|
Market multiple
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
Market capitalization
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
Quantas operations remain structured on an operating unit
basis, with each operating unit being organized into one of
three internal divisions, which are closely aligned with
Quantas reportable segments and are based on the
predominant type of work performed by the operating unit at the
point in time when the divisional designation is made. The
changes in Quantas reportable segments during the quarters
ended June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009 did not
have any impact on its operating unit structure. Because
separate measures of assets and cash flows are not produced or
utilized by management to evaluate segment performance,
Quantas impairment assessments of its goodwill do not
include any considerations of cash flows by its reportable
segments.
During 2007 and 2008, a goodwill analysis was performed for
each operating unit with estimates and industry comparables
obtained from the electric power and natural gas,
telecommunications and fiber optic licensing industries. At
December 31, 2007, Quanta did not perform a separate
goodwill impairment analysis for the operating unit that
provides fiber optic licensing services as Quanta had recently
acquired this operating unit on August 30, 2007 in
connection with its acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc.
(InfraSource), and goodwill associated with that transaction was
assessed in the aggregate. The
15-year
discounted cash flow model used for fiber optic licensing in
2008 was based on the long-term nature of the underlying fiber
network licensing agreements.
Quanta assigned a higher weighting to the discounted cash flow
approach at both December 31, 2007 and 2008 to reflect
increased expectations of market value being determined from a
held and used model. At December 31, 2008,
Quanta increased the weighting for the discounted cash flow
approach as compared to December 31, 2007 due to the
volatility of the capital markets at the end of 2008 and the
impact such volatility may have had on the accuracy of the
market multiple and market capitalization approaches. Also at
December 31, 2008, Quanta increased discount rates and
decreased EBITDA multiples at reporting units to reflect
potential declines in market conditions.
Quantas intangible assets include customer relationships,
backlog, non-compete agreements and patented rights and
developed technology. The value of customer relationships is
estimated using the
value-in-use
concept utilizing the income approach, specifically the excess
earnings method. The excess earnings analysis consists of
discounting to present value the projected cash flows
attributable to the customer relationships, with consideration
given to customer contract renewals, the importance or lack
thereof of existing customer relationships to Quantas
business plan, income taxes and required rates of return. Quanta
values backlog based upon the contractual nature of
10
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the backlog within each service line, using the income approach
to discount back to present value the cash flows attributable to
the backlog.
Quanta amortizes intangible assets based upon the estimated
consumption of the economic benefits of each intangible asset or
on a straight-line basis if the pattern of economic benefits
consumption cannot otherwise be reliably estimated. Intangible
assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment and
are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying
amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable and its
carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
Investments
in Joint Ventures
During the first quarter of 2009, one of Quantas operating
units entered into a joint venture arrangement that was formed
for the purpose of providing infrastructure services under a
contract with a large utility customer. The scope of services
provided includes the design, installation and maintenance of
electric transmission and distribution systems in the northeast
United States. The joint venture members each own an equal (50%)
equity interest in the joint venture entity and participate
equally in the losses of the entity. Generally, Quantas
share of the profits in the joint venture will be 75%, 67% and
50% during the first year, second year and thereafter,
respectively. Certain incentive profits will be shared equally
between the joint venture members throughout the term of the
joint venture.
Quanta has evaluated its investment in this joint venture and
determined that the joint venture is a variable interest entity,
with Quanta providing more than half of the subordinated
financial support to the entity through its expected provision
of the majority of the subcontractor services to be provided to
the joint venture. As a result, Quanta has been determined to be
the primary beneficiary of the joint venture and has accounted
for the results of the joint venture on a consolidated basis.
The other 50% equity interest in the joint venture has been
accounted for as a noncontrolling interest as of and for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Also during the first quarter of 2009, one of Quantas
operating units began operating under the terms of an
unincorporated joint venture which was entered into for the
purpose of providing joint engineering and construction services
for the design and installation of fuel storage facilities under
a contract for a specific customer. The joint venture is a
general partnership, and the joint venture partners each own an
equal equity interest in the joint venture and participate
equally in the profits and losses of the entity. Quanta has
evaluated this investment and has determined that its investment
in this joint venture partnership represents an undivided 50%
interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and profits of the
joint venture, and such amounts have been presented in the
accompanying financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Infrastructure Services Through its Electric Power
Infrastructure Services, Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure
Services and Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
segments, Quanta designs, installs and maintains networks for
customers in the electric power, natural gas and oil,
telecommunications and cable television industries. These
services may be provided pursuant to master service agreements,
repair and maintenance contracts and fixed price and non-fixed
price installation contracts. Pricing under these contracts may
be competitive unit price, cost-plus/hourly (or time and
materials basis) or fixed price (or lump sum basis), and the
final terms and prices of these contracts are frequently
negotiated with the customer. Under unit-based contracts, the
utilization of an output-based measurement is appropriate for
revenue recognition. Under these contracts, Quanta recognizes
revenue as units are completed based on pricing established
between Quanta and the customer for each unit of delivery, which
best reflects the pattern in which the obligation to the
customer is fulfilled. Under cost-plus/hourly and time and
materials type contracts, Quanta recognizes revenue on an input
basis, as labor hours are incurred and services are performed.
11
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenues from fixed price contracts are recognized using the
percentage-of-completion
method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to
total estimated costs for each contract. These contracts provide
for a fixed amount of revenues for the entire project. Such
contracts provide that the customer accept completion of
progress to date and compensate us for services rendered,
measured in terms of units installed, hours expended or some
other measure of progress. Contract costs include all direct
materials, labor and subcontract costs and those indirect costs
related to contract performance, such as indirect labor,
supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs. Much of the
materials associated with Quantas work are owner-furnished
and are therefore not included in contract revenues and costs.
The cost estimation process is based on the professional
knowledge and experience of Quantas engineers, project
managers and financial professionals. Changes in job
performance, job conditions and final contract settlements are
factors that influence managements assessment of the total
estimated costs to complete those contracts and therefore,
Quantas profit recognition. Changes in these factors may
result in revisions to costs and income, and their effects are
recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Provisions for losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the
period in which such losses are determined to be probable and
the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Quanta may incur costs subject to change orders, whether
approved or unapproved by the customer,
and/or
claims related to certain contracts. Quanta determines the
probability that such costs will be recovered based upon
evidence such as past practices with the customer, specific
discussions or preliminary negotiations with the customer or
verbal approvals. Quanta treats items as a cost of contract
performance in the period incurred if it is not probable that
the costs will be recovered or will recognize revenue if it is
probable that the contract price will be adjusted and can be
reliably estimated. As of September 30, 2009, Quanta had
approximately $21.9 million of change orders
and/or
claims that had been included as contract price adjustments on
certain contracts which were in the process of being negotiated
in the normal course of business.
The current asset Costs and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts represents revenues
recognized in excess of amounts billed for fixed price
contracts. The current liability Billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
represents billings in excess of revenues recognized for fixed
price contracts.
Fiber Optic Licensing The Fiber Optic Licensing
segment constructs and licenses the right to use fiber optic
telecommunications facilities to its customers pursuant to
licensing agreements, typically with terms from five to
twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal options. Under
those agreements, customers are provided the right to use a
portion of the capacity of a fiber optic facility, with the
facility owned and maintained by Quanta. Revenues, including any
initial fees or advance billings, are recognized ratably over
the expected length of the agreements, including probable
renewal periods. As of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, initial fees and advance billings on
these licensing agreements not yet recorded in revenue were
$34.6 million and $37.6 million and are recognized as
deferred revenue, with $25.1 million and $26.1 million
considered to be long-term and included in
12
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
other non-current liabilities. Minimum future licensing revenues
expected to be recognized by Quanta pursuant to these agreements
at September 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
17,078
|
|
2010
|
|
|
60,289
|
|
2011
|
|
|
47,370
|
|
2012
|
|
|
36,205
|
|
2013
|
|
|
25,698
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
68,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed non-cancelable minimum licensing revenues
|
|
$
|
255,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
Quanta follows the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recorded for future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax
rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the
underlying assets or liabilities are recovered or settled.
Quanta regularly evaluates valuation allowances established for
deferred tax assets for which future realization is uncertain.
The estimation of required valuation allowances includes
estimates of future taxable income. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences become deductible. Quanta considers projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. If actual future taxable income differs from these
estimates, Quanta may not realize deferred tax assets to the
extent estimated.
Quanta records reserves for expected tax consequences of
uncertain tax positions assuming that the taxing authorities
have full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. As
of September 30, 2009, the total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits relating mainly to uncertain tax positions was
$43.3 million, a decrease from December 31, 2008 of
$15.9 million, consisting of a $24.3 million decrease
due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations for the
2005 tax year, partially offset by a $8.4 million increase
primarily related to tax positions expected to be taken for
2009. Quanta recognized $1.2 million and
($6.4) million of interest expense (income) and penalties
in the provision for income taxes for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, and $4.0 million and
($3.6) million of interest expense (income) during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. The decrease in
interest and penalties is due to the reduction in the total
amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the three months
ended September 30, 2009. Quanta believes that it is
reasonably possible that within the next 12 months
unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by up to
$10.2 million due to the expiration of certain statutes of
limitations.
The income tax laws and regulations are voluminous and are often
ambiguous. As such, Quanta is required to make many subjective
assumptions and judgments regarding its tax positions that could
materially affect amounts recognized in its future consolidated
balance sheets and statements of operations.
Fair
Value Measurements
The carrying values of cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due
to the short-term nature of those instruments. Categorization
for disclosure purposes
13
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
is required for qualifying assets and liabilities into three
broad levels based on the priority of the inputs used to
determine the fair values. The fair value hierarchy gives the
highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). All of
Quantas cash equivalents that require categorization are
categorized as Level 1 assets at December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, as all fair values are based on
unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in an active
market that Quanta has the ability to access.
Quantas convertible subordinated notes are not required to
be carried at fair value, although their fair market value must
be disclosed. The fair market value of Quantas convertible
subordinated notes is subject to interest rate risk because of
their fixed interest rate and market risk due to the convertible
feature of the convertible subordinated notes. Generally, the
fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as
interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The
fair market value of Quantas convertible subordinated
notes will also increase as the market price of its stock rises
and will decrease as the market price of its stock falls. The
interest and market value changes affect the fair market value
of Quantas convertible subordinated notes but do not
impact their carrying value. The fair market value of
Quantas convertible subordinated notes is determined based
upon the quoted secondary market price on or before the dates
specified, which is considered a Level 2 input. The fair
value of the aggregate principal amount of Quantas
fixed-rate debt of $143.8 million was $136.6 million
at December 31, 2008 and $162.8 million at
September 30, 2009.
Quantas derivative liabilities at September 30, 2009
are all classified as Level 2 liabilities and have a total
fair value on such date of $0.1 million. The fair values
are determined based on adjusted broker quotes derived from open
market pricing information. These derivative liabilities are
included within accounts payable and accrued expenses in the
September 30, 2009 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Quanta uses fair value measurements on a routine basis in its
assessment of assets classified as goodwill, other intangible
assets and long-lived assets held and used. In accordance with
its annual impairment test during the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of goodwill was
compared to its fair value. No changes in carrying amount
resulted. The level of inputs used for fair value measurements
for goodwill, other intangibles assets and long-lived assets
held and used, are the lowest level (Level 3) inputs
for which Quanta uses the assistance of third party specialists
to develop valuation assumptions.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Quanta recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation based on the fair value of the awards granted, net
of estimated forfeitures, at the date of grant. Quanta
calculates the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of restricted
stock awards is determined based on the number of shares granted
and the closing price of Quantas common stock on the date
of grant. Forfeitures are estimated based upon historical
activity. The resulting compensation expense from discretionary
awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period, which is generally the vesting period, while
compensation expense from performance based awards is recognized
using the graded vesting method over the requisite service
period. The cash flows resulting from the tax deductions in
excess of the compensation expense recognized for options and
restricted stock (excess tax benefit) are classified as
financing cash flows.
Functional
Currency and Translation of Financial Statements
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for the majority of
Quantas operations. However, Quanta has foreign operating
units in Canada, for which Quanta considers the Canadian dollar
to be the functional currency. Generally, the currency in which
the operating unit transacts a majority of its transactions,
including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures,
would be considered the functional currency, but any dependency
upon the parent company and the nature of the operating
units operations must also be considered. In preparing the
consolidated financial statements, Quanta translates the
financial statements of its foreign operating units from their
functional currency into U.S. dollars. Statements of operations
and cash flows are translated at average monthly
14
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
rates, while balance sheets are translated at the month-end
exchange rates. The translation of the balance sheets at the
month-end exchange rates results in translation gains or losses.
Under the relevant accounting guidance, the treatment of these
translation gains or losses is dependent upon managements
determination of the functional currency of each operating unit,
involving consideration of all relevant economic facts and
circumstances affecting the operating unit. If transactions are
denominated in the entitys functional currency, the
translation gains and losses are included as a separate
component of stockholders equity under the caption
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If
transactions are not denominated in the entitys functional
currency, the translation gains and losses are included within
the statements of operations.
Derivatives
From time to time, Quanta enters into forward currency contracts
that qualify as derivatives, primarily to hedge the risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
related to certain forecasted foreign currency denominated
transactions. Quanta does not enter into derivative transactions
for speculative purposes; however, for accounting purposes,
certain transactions may not meet the criteria for cash flow
hedge accounting. For a hedge to qualify for cash flow hedge
accounting treatment, a hedge must be documented at the
inception of the contract, with the objective and strategy
stated, along with an explicit description of the methodology
used to assess hedge effectiveness. The dates (or periods) for
the expected forecasted events and the nature of the exposure
involved (including quantitative measures of the size of the
exposure) must also be documented. At the inception of the hedge
and on an ongoing basis, the hedge must be deemed to be
highly effective at minimizing the risk of the
identified exposure. Effectiveness measures relate the gains or
losses of the derivative to changes in the cash flows associated
with the hedged item, and the forecasted transaction must be
probable of occurring. For forward contracts that qualify as
cash flow hedges, Quanta accounts for the change in fair value
of the forward contracts directly in equity as part of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any ineffective
portion of cash flow hedges is recognized in earnings in the
period ineffectiveness occurs. For instance, if a forward
contract is discontinued as a cash flow hedge because it is
probable that the original forecasted transaction will not occur
by the end of the originally specified time period, the related
amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would
be reclassified to other income (expense) in the consolidated
statement of operations in the period such determination is
made. When a forecasted transaction occurs, the portion of the
accumulated gain or loss applicable to the forecasted
transaction is reclassified from equity to earnings. Changes in
fair value related to transactions that do not meet the criteria
for cash flow hedge accounting are recorded in the consolidated
results of operations and are included in other income (expense).
|
|
3.
|
CHANGES
IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND NEW ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS:
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. On
January 1, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20),
which requires issuers of certain convertible debt instruments
to separately account for the liability and equity components in
a manner that adjusts the recorded value of the convertible debt
to reflect the entitys non-convertible debt borrowing rate
and interest cost at the time of issuance. The value of the debt
instrument is adjusted through a discount to the face value of
the debt, which is amortized as non-cash interest expense over
the expected life of the debt, with an offsetting adjustment to
equity to separately recognize the value of the debt
instruments conversion feature. This FSP (ASC 470-20) has
been applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
Accordingly, Quanta recorded a cumulative effect of the change
in accounting principle to accumulated deficit as of January
1, 2007 of approximately $29.6 million. Also
included in accumulated deficit is the impact from non-cash
interest expense recorded in the amounts of approximately
$18.3 million ($11.8 million after tax effect) and
$14.9 million ($9.6 million after tax effect) for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008. In addition, Quanta
recorded non-cash interest expense during the first three
quarters of 2009 and will continue doing so until Quantas
3.75% convertible subordinated notes are redeemable at the
holders option in April 2013. Approximately
$4.3 million ($2.8 million after tax effect) non-cash
interest expense will be recorded in 2009, with approximately
$3.2 million
15
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
($2.1 million after tax effect) recorded in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. See the tables below for the
impact of the adoption of FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20) as
of December 31, 2008 and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
Also on January 1, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260). FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) states that unvested share-based payment awards
that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities and should be included in the computation of both
basic and diluted earnings per share. All prior period earnings
per share data presented have been adjusted retrospectively to
conform to the provisions of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260). All of Quantas restricted stock grants have
non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered
participating securities under FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260). Prior to the retrospective application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) on January 1, 2009, unvested restricted
stock grants were included in the calculation of weighted
average dilutive shares outstanding using the treasury stock
method. Under this previous method, unvested restricted common
shares were not included in the calculation of weighted average
basic shares outstanding but were included in the calculation of
weighted average diluted shares outstanding to the extent the
grant price was less than the average share price for the
respective period. The impact of the retrospective application
of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) on earnings per share for prior periods is
immaterial. Additionally, the adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) had no material impact on basic and diluted
income per share in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009. See the Statement of Operations tables
below for the impact of adopting FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
The following financial statement line items were affected as of
December 31, 2008 and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as a result of the retrospective
adoption of FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20) and
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) on January 1, 2009 (in thousands, except per
share data):
Consolidated
Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(ASC 470-20)
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
$
|
34,023
|
|
|
$
|
(544
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,479
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,554,787
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
3,554,243
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes
|
|
|
143,750
|
|
|
|
(21,475
|
)
|
|
|
122,275
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
83,422
|
|
|
|
7,682
|
|
|
|
91,104
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
896,821
|
|
|
|
(13,793
|
)
|
|
|
883,028
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,740,552
|
|
|
|
63,284
|
|
|
|
2,803,836
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(47,450
|
)
|
|
|
(50,035
|
)
|
|
|
(97,485
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,657,966
|
|
|
|
13,249
|
|
|
|
2,671,215
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,554,787
|
|
|
$
|
(544
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,554,243
|
|
16
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidated
Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
EITF 03-6-1
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(ASC 470-20)
|
|
|
(ASC 260)
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(5,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,614
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9,837
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
38,307
|
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,614
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
54,858
|
|
|
|
(2,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,937
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
171,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
173,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
203,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
203,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
EITF 03-6-1
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(ASC 470-20)
|
|
|
(ASC 260)
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(15,642
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(29,153
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
84,776
|
|
|
|
(4,959
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,817
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
119,628
|
|
|
|
(8,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,076
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
170,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
172,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
202,292
|
|
|
|
(6,414
|
)
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
196,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(ASC 470-20)
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
54,858
|
|
|
$
|
(2,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
51,937
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,731
|
|
|
|
4,731
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
538
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
9,970
|
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
|
|
8,277
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
16,816
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,816
|
|
17
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
(ASC 470-20)
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
119,628
|
|
|
$
|
(8,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
111,076
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
7,747
|
|
|
|
(4,959
|
)
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
50,118
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,118
|
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in
a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (ASC
805, Business Combinations). FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC
805) amends the provisions related to the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination under SFAS No. 141(R) (ASC
805) and has the same effective date as
SFAS No. 141(R) (ASC 805). Accordingly, Quanta adopted
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) effective January 1,
2009. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) carries forward the
requirements in SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, which is now superseded, for acquired
contingencies, which requires that such contingencies be
recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value
can be reasonably estimated during the measurement period.
Otherwise, companies should typically account for the acquired
contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies (ASC 450,
Contingencies). FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) also
amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 141(R)
(ASC 805) to require separate disclosure of recognized and
unrecognized contingencies if certain conditions are met. The
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) had no material impact on
Quantas consolidated financial position, results of
operations, cash flows or disclosures during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
On January 1, 2009, Quanta fully adopted
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (ASC
820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures), which
defines fair value, establishes methods used to measure fair
value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value
measurements with respect to financial and non-financial assets
and liabilities. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 (ASC
820) did not have a material impact on Quantas
consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash
flows or disclosures. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-4
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC
820-10-35-51),
which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value
when an entity determines that either the volume
and/or level
of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased. It also provides guidance to identify circumstances
that indicate when a transaction is not orderly. FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Quanta adopted FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The adoption of FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
did not have any material impact on Quantas consolidated
financial position, results of operations, cash flows or
disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (ASC
825-10-65,
Financial Instruments-Overall-Transition). FSP
FAS 107-1
(ASC
825-10-65)
requires public entities to provide the disclosures required by
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments (ASC 825, Financial
Instruments) on a quarterly basis and is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
early adoption permitted in certain circumstances for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. Because Quanta had been
providing these disclosures in its quarterly reports prior to
the issuance of FSP
FAS 107-1
(ASC
825-10-65),
the adoption of FSP
FAS 107-1
(ASC
18
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
825-10-65)
did not have any impact on Quantas consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP
FAS 115-2
and
FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (ASC
320-10-65-1,
Investments Debt and Equity
Securities Overall Transition). FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
establishes a new method of recognizing and reporting
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities. FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
also contains additional disclosure requirements related to debt
and equity securities. FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Because Quanta has not held any debt or equity securities that
would be within the scope of FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
since its adoption, the adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
did not have any impact on Quantas consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Quanta adopted
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (ASC 855,
Subsequent Events). Although SFAS No. 165 (ASC
855) should not result in significant changes in the
subsequent events an entity reports, it requires enhanced
disclosures related to subsequent events occurring through the
date which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.
SFAS No. 165 (ASC 855) is effective for interim
and annual financial statements ending after June 15, 2009
and must be applied prospectively. In accordance with
SFAS No. 165 (ASC 855), Quanta has evaluated
subsequent events through the date of issuance of these
condensed consolidated financial statements, which is
November 9, 2009.
On July 1, 2009, Quanta adopted ASC 105, which establishes
the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the
source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the
FASB to be used by non-governmental entities in the preparation
of financial statements presented in conformity with GAAP. Rules
and interpretations of the SEC under the authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants such as Quanta. On July 1, 2009, the
Codification reorganized the pre-Codification GAAP into
approximately 90 accounting topics and superseded all
then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All
accounting literature not included in the Codification became
non-authoritative. All of the Codifications content
carries the same level of authority, which effectively
superseded SFAS No. 162. ASC 105 is effective for
financial statements for interim or annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. Accordingly, Quanta adopted ASC 105 on
July 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a
material impact on Quantas consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows but has resulted
in changes to references to accounting principles in the notes
to its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted. In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140 and SFAS No. 167,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an amendment
to FIN 46(R). Together these new standards aim to
improve the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles currently
exempt from consolidation and address practice issues involving
the accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or
secured borrowings. These new standards are effective as of the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year beginning after
November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that
first year, with earlier adoption prohibited. Accordingly,
Quanta will adopt SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 on January 1,
2010. Quanta has not yet determined the impact, if any, the
adoption of SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 will have on its
consolidated financial statements. The FASB has not yet codified
these standards.
19
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In July 2009, Quanta completed two acquisitions of specialty
contractors with operations in the electric power, natural gas
and telecommunications industries with a combined purchase price
of approximately $22.3 million, consisting of approximately
$14.8 million in cash and 372,183 shares of Quanta
common stock valued at approximately $7.5 million at the
date of acquisition on a discounted basis as a result of the
restricted nature of the shares. These acquisitions enhance
Quantas electric power, natural gas and pipeline and
telecommunications capabilities throughout the Pacific Region
and Western Canada. The estimated fair value of the tangible
assets was $6.1 million and consisted of current assets of
$4.4 million and property and equipment of
$1.7 million. Net tangible assets acquired were
$3.9 million after considering the assumed liabilities of
$2.2 million. Quanta also recorded intangible assets in the
amount of $5.6 million, consisting of customer
relationships, backlog and non-compete agreements. The
consideration transferred in excess of the net tangible assets
acquired was recorded as goodwill in the amount of
$12.8 million. These allocations are based on the
significant use of estimates and on information that was
available to management at the time these interim condensed
consolidated financial statements were prepared.
Price
Gregory Acquisition
On October 1, 2009, Quanta acquired Price Gregory through
the acquisition of all of the outstanding stock of Price
Gregory. In connection with the Merger, Quanta issued
approximately 10.9 million shares of Quanta common stock
valued at approximately $231.8 million and paid
approximately $95.8 million in cash to the stockholders of
Price Gregory. Price Gregory provides natural gas and oil
transmission pipeline infrastructure services in North America
and expands Quantas service capabilities in this market.
Due to the recent closing of the Merger, financial information
related to Price Gregory, including Quantas pro forma
results as a result of the Merger, have not yet been completed.
Since the acquisition closed subsequent to September 30,
2009, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements do not reflect any adjustments related to the Merger,
although expenses related to the Merger of approximately
$1.3 million are included in selling, general and
administrative expense for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
|
|
5.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
A summary of changes in Quantas goodwill between
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
642,943
|
|
|
$
|
269,706
|
|
|
$
|
450,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,100
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
3,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
12,820
|
|
Foreign currency translation related to Canadian goodwill
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions closed in
previous quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
646,687
|
|
|
$
|
269,410
|
|
|
$
|
459,805
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantas goodwill reported above on a divisional basis
represents the aggregation of the operating units goodwill
into the internal division in which the operating unit is
organized. These divisions are closely aligned with the
reportable segments based on their operating units
predominate type of work.
20
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other intangible assets are comprised of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
111,379
|
|
|
$
|
114,576
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
54,139
|
|
|
|
55,275
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
16,336
|
|
|
|
17,599
|
|
Patented rights and developed technology
|
|
|
16,078
|
|
|
|
16,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
197,932
|
|
|
|
203,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
(11,381
|
)
|
|
|
(17,079
|
)
|
Backlog
|
|
|
(38,109
|
)
|
|
|
(44,362
|
)
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
(8,360
|
)
|
Patented rights and developed technology
|
|
|
(1,725
|
)
|
|
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(57,215
|
)
|
|
|
(72,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
140,717
|
|
|
$
|
131,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses for the amortization of intangible assets were
$9.0 million and $5.4 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and $29.5 million
and $15.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009. The remaining weighted average
amortization period for all intangible assets as of
September 30, 2009 is 11.1 years, while the remaining
weighted average amortization periods for customer
relationships, backlog, non-compete agreements and the patented
rights and developed technology are 13.0 years,
1.9 years, 2.7 years and 11.0 years,
respectively. The estimated future aggregate amortization
expense of intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 is
set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
5,700
|
|
2010
|
|
|
14,613
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,469
|
|
2012
|
|
|
14,268
|
|
2013
|
|
|
9,236
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
73,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
131,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Stock
Incentive Plans
Pursuant to the Quanta Services, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(the 2007 Plan), which was adopted on May 24, 2007, Quanta
may award restricted common stock, incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options. The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to
provide directors, key employees, officers and certain
consultants and advisors with additional performance incentives
by increasing their proprietary interest in Quanta. Prior to the
adoption of the 2007 Plan, Quanta had issued awards of
restricted common stock and stock options under its 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan (as amended and restated March 13, 2003)
(the 2001 Plan), which was terminated effective May 24,
2007, except that outstanding awards will continue to be
governed by the terms of the 2001 Plan. In connection with the
acquisition of InfraSource on August 30, 2007, Quanta
assumed InfraSources 2003 Omnibus Stock Incentive
21
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Plan and 2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, in each case as
amended (the InfraSource Plans). The InfraSource Plans were
terminated in connection with the acquisition, and no further
awards will be made under these plans, although the terms of
these plans will govern outstanding awards. The 2007 Plan, the
2001 Plan and the InfraSource Plans are referred to as the Plans.
Restricted
Stock
Restricted common stock has been issued under the Plans at the
fair market value of the common stock as of the date of
issuance. The shares of restricted common stock issued are
subject to forfeiture, restrictions on transfer and certain
other conditions until they vest, which generally occurs over
three or four years in equal annual installments. During the
restriction period, the restricted stockholders are entitled to
vote and receive dividends on such shares.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009,
Quanta granted 7,098 and 6,453 shares of restricted stock
under the 2007 Plan with a weighted average grant price of
$31.62 and $23.25. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, Quanta granted
0.8 million and 0.9 million shares of restricted stock
under the 2007 Plan with a weighted average grant price of
$23.69 and $22.14. Additionally, during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, 17,066 and 20,503 shares
vested with an approximate fair value at the time of vesting of
$0.5 million and $0.5 million. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, 0.6 million and
0.6 million shares vested with an approximate fair value at
the time of vesting of $15.0 million and $11.3 million.
As of September 30, 2009, there was approximately
$22.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested restricted stock granted to both employees
and non-employees. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.9 years.
Stock
Options
The stock options granted under the InfraSource Plans, which
were converted to options to acquire Quanta common stock upon
the acquisition of InfraSource, generally vest over four years
and have a maximum term of ten years; however, some options
vested on August 30, 2007 due to change of control
provisions in place in certain InfraSource option or management
agreements, and there has been and may be additional accelerated
vesting if the employment of certain option holders is
terminated within a certain period following the acquisition.
As of September 30, 2009, there was approximately
$1.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options issued under the InfraSource
Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over the next
twelve months.
Former InfraSource options exercised during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 had an intrinsic value of
$0.9 million, generated $0.7 million of cash proceeds
and generated a nominal amount of associated income tax benefit.
Former InfraSource options exercised during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 had an intrinsic value of
$11.1 million, generated $5.7 million of cash proceeds
and generated $4.3 million of associated income tax benefit.
22
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Non-Cash
Compensation Expense and Related Tax Benefits
The amounts of non-cash compensation expense and related tax
benefits, as well as the amount of actual tax benefits related
to vested restricted stock and options exercised are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense related to restricted stock
|
|
$
|
3,432
|
|
|
$
|
4,383
|
|
|
$
|
9,879
|
|
|
$
|
12,890
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense related to stock options
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation included in selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
4,043
|
|
|
$
|
4,969
|
|
|
$
|
12,402
|
|
|
$
|
14,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) from vested restricted stock
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
1,635
|
|
|
$
|
(1,595
|
)
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) for the tax deductions from options
exercised
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
4,490
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) related to stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
6,125
|
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
Income tax benefit related to non-cash compensation expense
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
4,837
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
$
|
10,962
|
|
|
$
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
PER SHARE
INFORMATION:
|
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, and
diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period
adjusted for all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents,
except in cases where the effect of the common stock equivalent
would be antidilutive. The amounts used to compute the basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009 are illustrated below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
NET INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
51,937
|
|
|
$
|
63,436
|
|
|
$
|
111,076
|
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
Effect of convertible subordinated notes under the
if-converted method interest expense
addback, net of taxes
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
13,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock for diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$
|
58,117
|
|
|
$
|
65,095
|
|
|
$
|
124,655
|
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
173,007
|
|
|
|
198,608
|
|
|
|
172,168
|
|
|
|
198,618
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Effect of convertible subordinated notes under the
if-converted method weighted convertible
shares issuable
|
|
|
30,637
|
|
|
|
6,415
|
|
|
|
24,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per
share
|
|
|
203,930
|
|
|
|
205,224
|
|
|
|
196,783
|
|
|
|
198,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
2009, stock options of approximately 0.1 million shares
were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
because the options exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of Quantas common stock. For each of
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, stock
options of approximately 0.1 million shares were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
options exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of Quantas common stock. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, the effect of assuming
conversion of the 3.75% convertible subordinated notes would
have been antidilutive and they were therefore excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share. The 4.5% convertible
subordinated notes were not outstanding during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Credit
Facility
Quanta has a credit facility with various lenders that provides
for a $475.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility maturing on September 19, 2012. Subject to the
conditions specified in the credit facility, borrowings under
the credit facility are to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The entire
unused portion of the credit facility is available for the
issuance of letters of credit.
As of September 30, 2009, Quanta had approximately
$183.9 million of letters of credit issued under the credit
facility and no outstanding revolving loans. The remaining
$291.1 million was available for revolving loans or issuing
new letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit
facility bear interest, at Quantas option, at a rate equal
to either (a) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit
facility) plus 0.875% to 1.75%, as determined by the ratio of
Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (as
defined in the credit facility), or (b) the base rate (as
described below) plus 0.00% to 0.75%, as determined by the ratio
of Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
Letters of credit issued under the credit facility are subject
to a letter of credit fee of 0.875% to 1.75%, based on the ratio
of Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
Quanta is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.35%,
based on the ratio of its total funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, on any unused availability under the credit facility.
The base rate equals the higher of (i) the Federal Funds
Rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus
1/2
of 1% or (ii) the banks prime rate.
The credit facility contains certain covenants, including
covenants with respect to maximum funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, maximum senior debt to consolidated EBITDA and minimum
interest coverage, in each case as specified in the credit
facility. For purposes of calculating the maximum funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio and the maximum senior debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio, Quantas maximum funded debt and
maximum senior debt are reduced by all cash and cash equivalents
(as defined in the credit facility) held by Quanta in excess of
$25.0 million. As of September 30, 2009, Quanta was in
compliance with all of its covenants. The credit facility limits
certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, capital
expenditures, asset sales and prepayments of indebtedness and,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits liens on material
assets. The credit facility also limits the payment of dividends
and stock repurchase programs in any fiscal year except those
payments or other distributions payable solely in capital stock.
The credit facility provides for customary events of default and
carries cross-default provisions with all of Quantas
existing subordinated notes, its continuing indemnity and
security agreement with its sureties and all of its other debt
instruments exceeding $15.0 million in borrowings. If an
event of default (as defined in the credit facility) occurs and
is continuing, on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the credit facility, amounts outstanding under the
credit facility may be accelerated and may become or be declared
immediately due and payable.
The credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital
stock of Quantas U.S. subsidiaries, 65% of the
capital stock of its foreign subsidiaries and substantially all
of its assets. Quantas U.S. subsidiaries guarantee
the repayment of all amounts due under the credit facility.
Quantas obligations under the credit facility constitute
designated senior indebtedness under its 3.75% convertible
subordinated notes.
24
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
3.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
At September 30, 2009, Quanta had outstanding
$143.8 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75%
convertible subordinated notes due 2026 (3.75% Notes). The
resale of the notes and the shares issuable upon conversion
thereof was registered for the benefit of the holders in a shelf
registration statement filed with the SEC. The 3.75% Notes
mature on April 30, 2026 and bear interest at the annual
rate of 3.75%, payable semi-annually on April 30 and
October 30, until maturity.
The $122.3 million and $125.5 million of convertible
subordinated notes on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 is presented
net of a debt discount of $21.5 million and
$18.3 million, which is amortized as interest expense over
the remaining amortization period. This debt discount was
recorded in accordance with the January 1, 2009 adoption of
FSP APB 14-1
(ASC 470-20)
as discussed in Notes 1 and 3. The effective interest rate
used to calculate total interest expense for the
3.75% Notes under FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20) was
7.85%. At September 30, 2009, the remaining amortization
period of the debt discount is approximately 3.6 years.
The 3.75% Notes are convertible into Quantas common
stock, based on an initial conversion rate of
44.6229 shares of Quantas common stock per $1,000
principal amount of 3.75% Notes (which is equal to an
initial conversion price of approximately $22.41 per share),
subject to adjustment as a result of certain events. The
3.75% Notes are convertible by the holder (i) during
any fiscal quarter if the closing price of Quantas common
stock is greater than 130% of the conversion price for at least
20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding
fiscal quarter, (ii) upon Quanta calling the
3.75% Notes for redemption, (iii) upon the occurrence
of specified distributions to holders of Quantas common
stock or specified corporate transactions or (iv) at any
time on or after March 1, 2026 until the business day
immediately preceding the maturity date of the 3.75% Notes.
The 3.75% Notes are not presently convertible, although
they have been convertible in certain prior quarters as a result
of the satisfaction of the market price condition described in
clause (i) above. If the 3.75% Notes become
convertible under any of these circumstances, Quanta has the
option to deliver cash, shares of Quantas common stock or
a combination thereof, with the amount of cash determined in
accordance with the terms of the indenture under which the notes
were issued. Conversions that may occur in the future could
result in the recording of losses on extinguishment of debt if
the conversions are settled in cash for an amount in excess of
the principal amount. The holders of the 3.75% Notes who
convert their notes in connection with certain change in control
transactions, as defined in the indenture, may be entitled to a
make whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion
rate. In the event of a change in control, in lieu of paying
holders a make whole premium, if applicable, Quanta may elect,
in some circumstances, to adjust the conversion rate and related
conversion obligations so that the 3.75% Notes are
convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company.
Beginning on April 30, 2010 until April 30, 2013,
Quanta may redeem for cash all or part of the 3.75% Notes
at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued
and unpaid interest, if the closing price of Quantas
common stock is equal to or greater than 130% of the conversion
price then in effect for the 3.75% Notes for at least 20
trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on
the trading day immediately prior to the date of mailing of the
notice of redemption. In addition, Quanta may redeem for cash
all or part of the 3.75% Notes at any time on or after
April 30, 2010 at certain redemption prices, plus accrued
and unpaid interest. Beginning with the six-month interest
period commencing on April 30, 2010, and for each six-month
interest period thereafter, Quanta will be required to pay
contingent interest on any outstanding 3.75% Notes during
the applicable interest period if the average trading price of
the 3.75% Notes during the five consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the last trading day before commencement
of the applicable interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the
principal amount of the notes. The contingent interest payable
within any applicable interest period will equal an annual rate
of 0.25% of the average trading price of the 3.75% Notes
during a five trading day reference period.
The holders of the 3.75% Notes may require Quanta to
repurchase all or a part of the notes in cash on each of
April 30, 2013, April 30, 2016 and April 30,
2021, and in the event of a change in control of Quanta, as
defined in the
25
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
indenture, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the 3.75% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The 3.75% Notes carry cross-default provisions with
Quantas other debt instruments exceeding
$20.0 million in borrowings, which includes Quantas
existing credit facility.
4.5% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
During 2008, the holders of $269.8 million aggregate
principal amount of Quantas 4.5% convertible subordinated
notes due 2023 (4.5% Notes) elected to convert their notes,
resulting in the issuance of 24,229,781 shares of
Quantas common stock, substantially all of which followed
a notice of redemption by Quanta that it would redeem on
October 8, 2008 all of the 4.5% Notes outstanding
pursuant to the indenture governing the notes. Quanta also
repurchased $106,000 aggregate principal amount of the
4.5% Notes on October 1, 2008 pursuant to the
holders election and redeemed for cash $49,000 aggregate
principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest,
on October 8, 2008. As a result of all of these
transactions, none of the 4.5% Notes remained outstanding
as of October 8, 2008. The 4.5% Notes were originally
issued in October 2003 for an aggregate principal amount of
$270.0 million and required semi-annual interest payments
on April 1 and October 1 until maturity.
Treasury
Stock
Pursuant to Quantas stock incentive plans, employees may
elect to satisfy their tax withholding obligations upon vesting
of restricted stock by having Quanta make such tax payments and
withhold a number of vested shares having a value on the date of
vesting equal to their tax withholding obligation. As a result
of such employee elections, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, Quanta withheld 187,466 and
195,733 shares of Quanta common stock with a total market
value of $4.5 million and $3.5 million for settlement
of employee tax liabilities. These shares were accounted for as
treasury stock. Also, participants may elect a net settlement
upon the exercise of vested stock options. When such election is
made, Quanta withholds from the total number of shares of Quanta
common stock purchased through the exercise that number of
shares of Quanta common stock having a value on the date of
exercise equal to the aggregate exercise price. During the first
nine months of 2009, Quanta withheld and placed into treasury
stock 13,213 shares of Quanta common stock as a result of
the net settlement of stock options. Under Delaware corporate
law, treasury stock is not entitled to vote or be counted for
quorum purposes.
Noncontrolling
Interest
During the first quarter of 2009, Quanta acquired a 50% interest
in a joint venture that qualifies as a variable interest entity
and has been included on a consolidated basis in the
accompanying financial statements as described in Note 2.
As a result, income attributable to the other joint venture
member has been accounted for as a reduction of reported net
income of approximately $0.5 million and $0.9 million
related to the noncontrolling interest for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 to derive net income
attributable to the common stockholders of Quanta. Equity in the
consolidated assets and liabilities of the joint venture
attributable to the other joint venture member has been
accounted for as a noncontrolling interest component of total
equity in the accompanying balance sheet.
The carrying value of the investment held by Quanta in this
variable interest entity was approximately $0.9 million at
September 30, 2009. The carrying value of the investment
held by the noncontrolling interest in this variable interest
entity at September 30, 2009 was $0.9 million. There
were no changes in equity as a result of transfers (to) from the
noncontrolling interest during the period.
26
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive
Income
Quantas foreign operations are translated into
U.S. dollars, and a translation adjustment is recorded in
other comprehensive income (loss) as a result. Additionally,
gains and losses on foreign currency cash flow hedges are also
recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The following
table presents the components of comprehensive income for the
periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
51,937
|
|
|
$
|
63,956
|
|
|
$
|
111,076
|
|
|
$
|
119,090
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,228
|
)
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
(2,245
|
)
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
Loss on foreign currency hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
50,709
|
|
|
|
66,199
|
|
|
|
108,831
|
|
|
|
123,839
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
50,709
|
|
|
$
|
65,679
|
|
|
$
|
108,831
|
|
|
$
|
122,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, one of Quantas Canadian
operating units entered into three forward contracts to reduce
foreign currency risk associated with anticipated customer sales
that are denominated in South African rand. This same operating
unit also entered into three additional forward contracts to
reduce the foreign currency exposure associated with a series of
forecasted payments denominated in U.S. dollars to be made in
the next twelve months. These forward contracts expire between
December 2009 and November 2010.
Three of these forward contracts are for an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $11.0 million (Canadian) and are
accounted for by the Canadian operating unit as cash flow
hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the three
forward contracts between the South African rand and the
Canadian dollar are recorded in other comprehensive income
(loss) and will be reclassified into earnings in the periods in
which the hedged forecasted transactions occur. During the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, a nominal loss was
recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) as shown above
related to the three South African rand to Canadian dollar
forward contracts.
The other three forward contracts are for an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $9.5 million (U.S.) and are also
accounted for as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, changes in the
fair value of the three forward contracts between the Canadian
dollar and the U.S. dollar are recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) and will be reclassified into
earnings in the periods in which the hedged forecasted
transactions occur. During the quarter ended September 30,
2009, a nominal amount was recorded to other comprehensive
income (loss) related to the three Canadian dollar to
U.S. dollar forward contracts.
Effectiveness testing related to these cash flow hedges is
performed at the end of each quarter. Any ineffective portion of
the derivatives is reclassified into earnings if the derivatives
are no longer deemed to be cash flow hedges. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, a nominal amount was
considered ineffective and was recorded within other income
(expense) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In connection with the acquisition of Price Gregory and its
impact on Quantas divisional structure used for internal
management purposes, an updated evaluation of Quantas
reportable segments was performed during the third quarter of
2009. As a result, Quantas operations are now presented
under four reportable segments: (1) Electric Power
Infrastructure Services, (2) Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services,
27
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(3) Telecommunications Infrastructure Services and
(4) Fiber Optic Licensing. This structure is generally
focused on broad end-user markets for Quantas services.
The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the electric
power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power
transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities
and the installation of smart grid technology on
electric power networks along with engineering and technical
services to customers in this segment. Services also performed
by this segment include design and installation of wind turbine
facilities and solar arrays and related switchyards and
transmission networks for renewable power generation sources. To
a lesser extent, this segment also provides services such as the
design, installation, maintenance and repair of commercial and
industrial wiring, installation of traffic networks and the
installation of cable and control systems for light rail lines.
The Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment
provides comprehensive network solutions to customers involved
in the transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline
products. Services performed by the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of natural gas and oil
transmission and distribution systems and related trenching and
directional boring services. In addition, this segment provides
the design and installation of pipeline protection services and
performs pipeline integrity and rehabilitation services. To a
lesser extent, this segment designs, installs and maintains
airport fueling systems as well as water and sewer
infrastructure.
The Telecommunications Infrastructure Services segment
predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions to
customers in the telecommunications and cable television
industries. Services performed by the Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of fiber optic, copper and
coaxial cable networks used for video, data and voice
transmission. In addition, services include the design and
installation of wireless communications towers and switching
systems. To a lesser extent, services provided under this
segment include cable locating, splicing and testing of fiber
optic networks and residential installation of fiber optic
cabling.
The Fiber Optic Licensing segment designs, procures, constructs
and maintains fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to its customers. This
segment provides high bandwidth telecommunication solutions to
educational and healthcare institutions, large industrial and
financial services customers and other entities with high
bandwidth telecommunication needs. The telecommunication
services provided through this segment are generally subject to
regulation by the Federal Communications Commission and certain
state public utility commissions.
Quantas segment results are derived from the types of
services provided across its operating units in each of the end
user markets described above. Quantas entrepreneurial
business model allows each of its operating units to serve the
same or similar customers and to provide a range of services
across end user markets. Quantas operating units are
organized into one of three internal divisions, namely, the
electric power division, natural gas and pipeline division and
telecommunications division. These internal divisions are
closely aligned with the reportable segments described above
based on their operating units predominant type of work,
with the operating units providing predominantly
telecommunications and fiber optic licensing services being
managed within the same internal division.
Reportable segment information, including revenues and operating
income by type of work, is gathered from each operating unit for
the purpose of evaluating segment performance in support of
Quantas market strategies. These classifications of
Quantas operating unit revenues by type of work for
segment reporting purposes can at times require judgment on the
part of management. Quantas operating units may perform
joint infrastructure service projects for customers in multiple
industries, deliver multiple types of network services under a
single customer contract or provide service across industries,
for example, joint trenching projects to install distribution
28
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
lines for electric power, natural gas and telecommunications
customers or the installation of broadband communication over
electric power lines.
In addition Quantas integrated operations and common
administrative support at each of its operating units requires
that certain allocations, including allocations of shared and
indirect costs, such as facility costs indirect operating
expenses including depreciation, and general and administrative
costs, are made to determine operating segment profitability.
Corporate costs, such as payroll and benefits, employee travel
expenses, facility costs, professional fees, acquisition costs
and amortization related to certain intangible assets are not
allocated.
Prior to the second quarter of 2009, Quanta reported its results
under two business segments, with all of its operating segments,
other than the operating segment comprising the Fiber Optic
Licensing segment, aggregated into the Infrastructure Services
segment. During the second quarter of 2009, Quanta reported its
results under three reportable segments:
(1) Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services,
(2) Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services
and (3) Dark Fiber. The prior periods have been restated to
reflect the change to the reportable segments described above.
Summarized financial information for Quantas reportable
segments is presented in the following tables (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
|
|
|
Gas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Optic
|
|
|
Corporate and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
Non-Allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
645,511
|
|
|
$
|
263,955
|
|
|
$
|
127,060
|
|
|
$
|
16,829
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,053,355
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
82,506
|
|
|
|
27,030
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
9,195
|
|
|
|
(25,259
|
)
|
|
|
96,442
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
10,366
|
|
|
$
|
5,682
|
|
|
$
|
1,639
|
|
|
$
|
1,533
|
|
|
$
|
9,584
|
|
|
$
|
28,804
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
512,797
|
|
|
$
|
131,628
|
|
|
$
|
113,998
|
|
|
$
|
22,371
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
66,778
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
11,757
|
|
|
|
(21,787
|
)
|
|
|
71,162
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
10,068
|
|
|
$
|
5,530
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
$
|
6,223
|
|
|
$
|
25,988
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,735,906
|
|
|
$
|
650,373
|
|
|
$
|
428,899
|
|
|
$
|
43,501
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,858,679
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
184,294
|
|
|
|
51,255
|
|
|
|
32,579
|
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
(79,884
|
)
|
|
|
211,535
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
30,511
|
|
|
$
|
16,812
|
|
|
$
|
4,877
|
|
|
$
|
4,196
|
|
|
$
|
31,054
|
|
|
$
|
87,450
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,551,496
|
|
|
$
|
433,138
|
|
|
$
|
284,024
|
|
|
$
|
64,045
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
178,768
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
18,684
|
|
|
|
32,023
|
|
|
|
(67,942
|
)
|
|
|
169,690
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
30,157
|
|
|
$
|
16,521
|
|
|
$
|
4,864
|
|
|
$
|
6,676
|
|
|
$
|
17,556
|
|
|
$
|
75,774
|
|
29
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Separate measures of Quantas assets and cash flows,
including capital expenditures, by reportable segment are not
produced or utilized by management to evaluate segment
performance. Quantas fixed assets include operating
machinery, equipment and vehicles that are used on an
interchangeable basis across its reportable segments, as well as
office equipment, buildings and leasehold improvements that are
shared across segment operations. As a result, depreciation is
allocated to Quantas reportable segments based upon each
operating units revenue contribution to each reportable
segment.
Foreign
Operations
Quanta does not have significant operations or long-lived assets
in countries outside of the United States. Quanta derived
$27.2 million and $78.7 million of its revenues from
foreign operations during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008. Quanta derived $27.2 million and
$61.6 million of its revenues from foreign operations
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The majority of revenues from foreign operations were earned in
Canada during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2009.
|
|
11.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Joint
Venture Contingencies
As described in Note 2, one of Quantas operating
units entered into a joint venture with a third party
engineering company during the first quarter of 2009 for the
purpose of providing infrastructure services under a contract
with a large utility customer. Losses incurred by the joint
venture are typically shared equally by the joint venture
members. However, under the terms of the joint venture
agreement, each member of the joint venture has guaranteed all
of the obligations of the joint venture under the contract with
the customer and therefore can be liable for full performance of
the contract to the customer. Quanta is not aware of
circumstances that would lead to future claims against it for
material amounts in connection with this performance guarantee.
In addition, as described in Note 2, another of
Quantas operating units began operations during the first
quarter of 2009 in a joint venture with a third party for the
purpose of providing joint engineering and construction services
for the design and installation of fuel storage facilities under
a contract with a specific customer. Under the joint venture
agreement, the losses incurred by the joint venture are
typically shared equally by the joint venture partners. However,
the joint venture is a general partnership, and as such, the
joint venture partners are jointly and severally liable for all
of the obligations of the joint venture, including obligations
owed to the customer or any other person or entity. Quanta is
not aware of circumstances that would lead to future claims
against it for material amounts in connection with its joint and
several liability.
In each of the above joint venture arrangements, each joint
venturer has indemnified the other for any liabilities incurred
in excess of the liabilities for which the joint venturer is
obligated to bear under the respective joint venture agreement.
It is possible, however, that Quanta could be required to pay or
perform obligations in excess of its share if the other joint
venturer failed or refused to pay or perform its share of the
obligations. Quanta is not aware of circumstances that would
lead to future claims against it for material amounts that would
not be indemnified.
Leases
Quanta leases certain land, buildings and equipment under
non-cancelable lease agreements, including related party leases.
The terms of these agreements vary from lease to lease,
including some with renewal options and
30
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
escalation clauses. The following schedule shows the future
minimum lease payments under these leases as of
September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
14,606
|
|
2010
|
|
|
43,462
|
|
2011
|
|
|
32,236
|
|
2012
|
|
|
21,789
|
|
2013
|
|
|
15,841
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
15,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
143,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense related to operating leases was approximately
$27.3 million and $81.7 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and approximately
$26.6 million and $79.3 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
Quanta has guaranteed the residual value on certain of its
equipment operating leases. Quanta guarantees the difference
between this residual value and the fair market value of the
underlying asset at the date of termination of the leases. At
September 30, 2009, the maximum guaranteed residual value
was approximately $141.2 million. Quanta believes that no
significant payments will be made as a result of the difference
between the fair market value of the leased equipment and the
guaranteed residual value. However, there can be no assurance
that significant payments will not be required in the future.
Committed
Capital Expenditures
Quanta has committed capital for expansion of its fiber optic
network. Quanta typically does not commit capital to new network
expansions until it has a committed licensing arrangement in
place with at least one customer. The amounts of committed
capital expenditures are estimates of costs required to build
the networks under contract. The actual capital expenditures
related to building the networks could vary materially from
these estimates. As of September 30, 2009, Quanta estimates
these committed capital expenditures to be approximately
$12.9 million for the period October 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009 and $12.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Litigation
Quanta is also from time to time party to various lawsuits,
claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These actions typically seek, among other
things, compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of
contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, Quanta records reserves
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Quanta does not
believe that any of these proceedings, separately or in the
aggregate, would be expected to have a material adverse effect
on Quantas financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Quanta is subject to concentrations of credit risk related
primarily to its cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. Substantially all of Quantas cash investments
are managed by what it believes to be high credit quality
financial institutions. In accordance with Quantas
investment policies, these institutions are authorized to invest
this cash in a diversified portfolio of what Quanta believes to
be high quality investments, which consist primarily of
interest-bearing demand deposits, money market mutual funds and
investment grade commercial paper with original maturities
31
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of three months or less. Although Quanta does not currently
believe the principal amount of these investments is subject to
any material risk of loss, the recent volatility in the
financial markets is likely to significantly impact the interest
income Quanta receives from these investments. In addition,
Quanta grants credit under normal payment terms, generally
without collateral, to its customers, which include electric
power and natural gas companies, telecommunications and cable
television system operators, governmental entities, general
contractors, and builders, owners and managers of commercial and
industrial properties located primarily in the United States.
Consequently, Quanta is subject to potential credit risk related
to changes in business and economic factors throughout the
United States, which may be heightened as a result of the
current financial crisis and volatility of the markets. However,
Quanta generally has certain statutory lien rights with respect
to services provided. Under certain circumstances, such as
foreclosures or negotiated settlements, Quanta may take title to
the underlying assets in lieu of cash in settlement of
receivables. In such circumstances, extended time frames may be
required to liquidate these assets, causing the amounts realized
to differ from the value of the assumed receivable.
Historically, some of Quantas customers have experienced
significant financial difficulties, and others may experience
financial difficulties in the future. These difficulties expose
Quanta to increased risk related to collectability of
receivables for services Quanta has performed. No customers
represented 10% or more of revenues during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 or 2009 or of accounts
receivable at September 30, 2009 and at December 31,
2008.
Self-Insurance
Quanta is insured for employers liability, general
liability, auto liability and workers compensation claims.
Through July 31, 2009, employers liability claims
were subject to a deductible of $1.0 million per
occurrence, general liability and auto liability claims were
subject to a deductible of $3.0 million per occurrence, and
workers compensation claims were subject to a deductible
of $2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, through
July 31, 2009, Quantas workers compensation
claims were subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability
of up to $1.0 million on claims in excess of
$2.0 million per occurrence. As of August 1, 2009,
Quanta renewed its employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation policies for the
2009 to 2010 policy year. As a result of the renewal, the
deductibles for all policies have increased to $5.0 million
per occurrence, other than employers liability which is
subject to a deductible of $1.0 million. Additionally, in
connection with this renewal, the amount of letters of credit
required by Quanta to secure its obligations under its casualty
insurance program, which is discussed further below, has
increased. Quanta also has employee health care benefit plans
for most employees not subject to collective bargaining
agreements, of which the primary plan is subject to a deductible
of $350,000 per claimant per year.
Losses under all of these insurance programs are accrued based
upon Quantas estimates of the ultimate liability for
claims reported and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet
reported, with assistance from third-party actuaries. These
insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due
to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the
determination of Quantas liability in proportion to other
parties, the number of incidents not yet reported and the
effectiveness of its safety program. The accruals are based upon
known facts and historical trends and management believes such
accruals to be adequate. As of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, the gross amount accrued for insurance
claims totaled $147.9 million and $143.9 million, with
$105.0 million and $103.1 million considered to be
long-term and included in other non-current liabilities. Related
insurance recoveries/receivables as of December 31, 2008
and September 30, 2009 were $12.5 million and
$13.4 million, of which $7.2 million and
$6.9 million are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $5.3 million and $6.5 million are
included in other assets, net.
Letters
of Credit
Certain of Quantas vendors require letters of credit to
ensure reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on its
behalf, such as to beneficiaries under its self-funded insurance
programs. In addition, from time to time some customers require
Quanta to post letters of credit to ensure payment to its
subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to
guarantee performance under its contracts. Such letters of
credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial
institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay
specified amounts to the holder of the
32
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
letter of credit if the holder demonstrates that Quanta has
failed to perform specified actions. If this were to occur,
Quanta would be required to reimburse the issuer of the letter
of credit. Depending on the circumstances of such a
reimbursement, Quanta may also have to record a charge to
earnings for the reimbursement. Quanta does not believe that it
is likely that any material claims will be made under a letter
of credit in the foreseeable future.
As of September 30, 2009, Quanta had $183.9 million in
letters of credit outstanding under its credit facility
primarily to secure obligations under its casualty insurance
program. These are irrevocable stand-by letters of credit with
maturities generally expiring at various times throughout 2009
and 2010. Upon maturity, it is expected that the majority of
these letters of credit will be renewed for subsequent one-year
periods.
Performance
Bonds and Parent Guarantees
In certain circumstances, Quanta is required to provide
performance bonds in connection with its contractual
commitments. Quanta has indemnified its sureties for any
expenses paid out under these performance bonds. As of
September 30, 2009, the total amount of outstanding
performance bonds was approximately $725.3 million, and the
estimated cost to complete these bonded projects was
approximately $225.8 million.
Quanta, from time to time, guarantees the obligations of its
wholly owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain
contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and, in some
states, obligations in connection with obtaining
contractors licenses. Quanta has also guaranteed the
obligations of its wholly owned subsidiary under the joint
venture arrangement entered into in the first quarter of 2009
with a third party engineering company.
Employment
Agreements
Quanta has various employment agreements with certain executives
and other employees, which provide for compensation and certain
other benefits and for severance payments under certain
circumstances. Certain employment agreements also contain
clauses that become effective upon a change of control of
Quanta. In addition, employment agreements between InfraSource
and certain of its executives and employees included provisions
that became effective upon termination of employment within a
specified time period, generally two years, following the change
of control of InfraSource. Upon the occurrence of any of the
defined events in the various employment agreements, Quanta will
pay certain amounts to the employee, which vary with the level
of the employees responsibility.
Collective
Bargaining Agreements
Certain of Quantas operating units are parties to various
collective bargaining agreements with certain of their
employees. The agreements require such subsidiaries to pay
specified wages, provide certain benefits to their union
employees and contribute certain amounts to multi-employer
pension plans and employee benefit trusts. If the participating
subsidiaries withdrew from, or otherwise terminated
participation in, one or more multi-employer pension plans or
the plans were to otherwise become underfunded; the subsidiaries
could be assessed liabilities for additional contributions
related to the underfunding of these plans. The collective
bargaining agreements expire at various times and have typically
been renegotiated and renewed on terms similar to the ones
contained in the expiring agreements.
Indemnities
Quanta has indemnified various parties against specified
liabilities that those parties might incur in the future in
connection with Quantas previous acquisitions of certain
companies. The indemnities under acquisition agreements usually
are contingent upon the other party incurring liabilities that
reach specified thresholds. Quanta also generally indemnifies
its customers for the services it provides under its contracts,
as well as other specified liabilities, which may subject Quanta
to indemnity claims and liabilities and related litigation. As
of September 30, 2009, Quanta is not aware of any asserted
claims against it for material amounts in connection with these
indemnity obligations.
33
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 2,
2009 and is available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov
and on our website, which is www.quantaservices.com. The
discussion below contains forward-looking statements that are
based upon our current expectations and are subject to
uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may
differ materially from these expectations due to inaccurate
assumptions and known or unknown risks and uncertainties,
including those identified under the headings Uncertainty
of Forward-Looking Statements and Information below in
this Item 2 and Risk Factors in Item 1A of
Part II of this Quarterly Report.
Introduction
We are a leading national provider of specialty contracting
services, offering
end-to-end
network solutions to the electric power, natural gas and oil,
telecommunications and cable television industries. We believe
that we are one of the largest contractors servicing the
transmission and distribution sectors of the North American
electric utility and natural gas transmission pipeline
industries.
We had consolidated revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 of approximately $2.3 billion, of
which 66.5% was attributable to electric power infrastructure
services, 18.6% to natural gas and pipeline infrastructure
services, 12.2% to telecommunications infrastructure services
and 2.7% to fiber optic licensing.
Our customers include many of the leading companies in the
industries we serve. We have developed strategic alliances with
numerous customers and strive to develop and maintain our status
as a preferred vendor to our customers. We enter into various
types of contracts, including competitive unit price, hourly
rate, cost-plus (or time and materials basis), and fixed price
(or lump sum basis), the final terms and prices of which we
frequently negotiate with the customer. Although the terms of
our contracts vary considerably, most are made on either a unit
price or fixed price basis in which we agree to do the work for
a price per unit of work performed (unit price) or for a fixed
amount for the entire project (fixed price). We complete a
substantial majority of our fixed price projects within one
year, while we frequently provide maintenance and repair work
under open-ended unit price or cost-plus master service
agreements that are renewable periodically.
We recognize revenue on our unit price and cost-plus contracts
as units are completed or services are performed. For our fixed
price contracts, we record revenues as work on the contract
progresses on a
percentage-of-completion
basis. Under this method, revenue is recognized based on the
percentage of total costs incurred to date in proportion to
total estimated costs to complete the contract. Fixed price
contracts generally include retainage provisions under which a
percentage of the contract price is withheld until the project
is complete and has been accepted by our customer.
Effective during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we
began reporting our results under four reportable segments:
(1) Electric Power Infrastructure Services,
(2) Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services,
(3) Telecommunications Infrastructure Services and
(4) Fiber Optic Licensing. These reportable segments are
based on the types of work we provide, which are used to define
our operating segments. For internal management purposes, our
operating units are organized into one of three internal
divisions, namely, the electric power division, natural gas and
pipeline division and telecommunications division. These
internal divisions are closely aligned with the reportable
segments described above based on their operating units
predominant type of work, with the operating units providing
predominantly telecommunications and fiber optic licensing
services being managed within the same internal division.
Reportable segment information, including revenues and operating
income by type of work, is gathered from each operating unit for
the purpose of evaluating segment performance in support of our
market strategies. These classifications of our operating unit
revenues by type of work for segment reporting purposes can at
times require judgment on the part of management. Our operating
units may perform joint infrastructure service projects for
customers in multiple industries, deliver multiple types of
network services under a single customer contract or provide
service across industries, for example, joint trenching projects
to install distribution lines for electric power, natural gas
and telecommunication customers, and the installation of
34
broadband communication over electric power lines. Our
integrated operations and common administrative support at each
of our operating units requires that certain allocations,
including allocations of shared and indirect costs, such as
facility costs, indirect operating expenses including
depreciation and general and administrative costs, are made to
determine operating segment profitability. Corporate costs, such
as payroll and benefits, employee travel expenses, facility
costs, professional fees, acquisition costs and amortization
related to certain intangible costs are not allocated. For the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, we reported our results under
three business segments: (1) Electric & Gas
Infrastructure Services, (2) Telecom & Ancillary
Infrastructure Services and (3) Dark Fiber. Prior to the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, we reported our results under
two reportable segments with all of our previously defined
operating segments, other than the operating segment comprising
the Fiber Optic Licensing segment, having been aggregated into
the Infrastructure Services segment.
The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the electric
power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power
transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities
and the installation of smart grid technology on
electric power networks along with engineering and technical
services to customers in this segment. Services also performed
by this segment include design and installation of wind turbine
facilities and solar arrays and related switchyards and
transmission networks for renewable power generation sources. To
a lesser extent, this segment also provides services such as the
design, installation, maintenance and repair of commercial and
industrial wiring, installation of traffic networks and the
installation of cable and control systems for light rail lines.
The Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment
provides comprehensive network solutions to customers involved
in the transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline
products. Services performed by the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of gas and oil transmission
and distribution systems and related trenching and directional
drilling services. In addition, this segment provides the design
and installation of pipeline protection services and performs
pipeline integrity and rehabilitation services. To a lesser
extent, this segment designs, installs and maintains airport
fueling systems as well as water and sewer infrastructure.
The Telecommunications Infrastructure Services segment
predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions to
customers in the telecommunications and cable television
industries. Services performed by the Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of fiber optic, copper and
coaxial cable networks used for video, data and voice
transmission. In addition, services include the design and
installation of wireless communications towers and switching
systems. To a lesser extent, services provided under this
segment include cable locating, splicing and testing of fiber
optic networks and residential installation of fiber optic
cabling.
The Fiber Optic Licensing segment designs, procures, constructs
and maintains fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to our customers
pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with lease terms
from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal
options. Under those agreements, customers are provided the
right to use a portion of the capacity of a fiber optic
facility, with the facility owned and maintained by us. The
Fiber Optic Licensing segment services educational and
healthcare institutions, large industrial and financial services
customers and other entities with high bandwidth
telecommunication needs. The telecommunication services provided
through this segment are subject to regulation by the Federal
Communications Commission and certain state public utility
commissions.
Recent
Acquisitions
On October 1, 2009, we acquired, through a merger
transaction (the Merger), all of the outstanding stock of Price
Gregory. In connection with the Merger, we issued approximately
10.9 million shares of our common stock valued at
approximately $231.8 million and paid approximately
$95.8 million in cash to the stockholders of Price Gregory.
As the Merger was effective October 1, 2009, the results of
Price Gregory will be included in our consolidated financial
statements beginning on such date. Price Gregory provides
natural gas and oil transmission pipeline infrastructure
services in North America. The acquisition significantly expands
our existing natural gas and
35
pipeline operations and, when combined with our electric power
services, positions us as a leader in the North American energy
transmission infrastructure market. In conjunction with this
Merger, we have formed a new internal management division called
the Natural Gas and Pipeline division. Because of the type of
work performed by Price Gregory, its financial results will
generally be included in the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment.
In July 2009, we completed two acquisitions of specialty
contractors with operations in the electric power, gas and
telecommunications industries with a combined purchase price of
approximately $22.3 million, consisting of approximately $14.8
million in cash and 372,183 shares of our common stock valued at
approximately $7.5 million at the date of acquisition on a
discounted basis as a result of the restricted nature of the
shares. These acquisitions enhance our electric, gas and
pipeline and telecommunications capabilities throughout the
Pacific Region and Western Canada. The estimated fair value of
the tangible assets was $6.1 million and consisted of current
assets of $4.4 million and property and equipment of $1.7
million. Net tangible assets acquired were $3.9 million after
considering the assumed liabilities of $2.2 million. We also
recorded intangible assets in the amount of $5.6 million,
consisting of customer relationships, backlog and non-compete
agreements. The consideration transferred in excess of the net
tangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill in the amount
of $12.8 million. These allocations are based on the significant
use of estimates and on information that was available to
management at the time these interim condensed consolidated
financial statements were prepared.
Seasonality;
Fluctuations of Results; Economic Conditions
Our revenues and results of operations can be subject to
seasonal and other variations from period to period. These
variations are influenced by numerous factors, including
weather, customer spending patterns, bidding seasons, project
schedules and timing and holidays. In general, our revenues are
lowest in the first quarter of the year because cold, snowy or
wet conditions cause delays. The second quarter is typically
better than the first, as some projects begin, but continued
cold and wet weather can often impact second quarter
productivity. The third quarter is typically the best of the
year, as a greater number of projects are underway and weather
is more accommodating to work on projects. Generally, revenues
during the fourth quarter of the year are lower than the third
quarter but higher than the second quarter. Many projects are
completed in the fourth quarter, and revenues are often impacted
positively by customers seeking to spend their capital budget
before the end of the year; however, the holiday season and
inclement weather sometimes can cause delays and thereby reduce
revenues and increase costs.
Additionally, our industry can be highly cyclical. As a result,
our volume of business may be adversely affected by declines or
delays in new projects in various geographic regions in the
United States. Project schedules, in particular in connection
with larger, longer-term projects, can also create fluctuations
in the services provided under projects, which may adversely
affect us in a given quarter. The financial condition of our
customers and their access to capital, variations in the margins
of projects performed during any particular quarter, regional,
national and global economic and market conditions, timing of
acquisitions, timing and magnitude of assimilation costs
associated with acquisitions and interest rate fluctuations may
also materially affect quarterly results. Accordingly, our
operating results in any particular quarter or year may not be
indicative of the results that can be expected for any other
quarter or for any other year.
We and our customers are operating in a challenging business
environment in light of the economic downturn and weak capital
markets. We are closely monitoring our customers and the effect
that changes in economic and market conditions may have on them.
We have experienced reduced spending by our customers in 2009,
which we attribute to negative economic and market conditions,
and we anticipate that these negative conditions may continue to
affect demand for our services. However, we believe that most of
our customers, many of whom are regulated utilities, remain
financially stable in general and will be able to continue with
their business plans in the long-term without substantial
constraints. You should read Outlook and
Understanding Gross Margins for additional
discussion of trends and challenges that may affect our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Understanding
Gross Margins
Our gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of
revenues. Cost of services, which is subtracted from revenues to
obtain gross profit, consists primarily of salaries, wages and
benefits to employees, depreciation,
36
fuel and other equipment expenses, equipment rentals,
subcontracted services, insurance, facilities expenses,
materials and parts and supplies. Various factors
some controllable, some not impact our gross margins
on a quarterly or annual basis.
Seasonal and Geographical. As discussed above,
seasonal patterns can have a significant impact on gross
margins. Generally, business is slower in the winter months
versus the warmer months of the year. This can be offset
somewhat by increased demand for electrical service and repair
work resulting from severe weather. In addition, the mix of
business conducted in different parts of the country will affect
margins, as some parts of the country offer the opportunity for
higher gross margins than others due to the geographic
characteristics associated with the physical location where the
work is being performed. Such characteristics include whether
the project is performed in an urban versus a rural setting or
in a mountainous area or in open terrain. Site conditions,
including unforeseen underground conditions, can also impact
margins.
Weather. Adverse or favorable weather
conditions can impact gross margins in a given period. For
example, it is typical in the first quarter of any fiscal year
that parts of the country may experience snow or rainfall that
may negatively impact our revenues and gross margin due to
reduced productivity. In many cases, projects may be delayed or
temporarily placed on hold. Conversely, in periods when weather
remains dry and temperatures are accommodating, more work can be
done, sometimes with less cost, which would have a favorable
impact on gross margins. In some cases, severe weather, such as
hurricanes and ice storms, can provide us with higher margin
emergency restoration service work, which generally has a
positive impact on margins.
Revenue Mix. The mix of revenues derived from
the industries we serve will impact gross margins, as certain
industries provide higher margin opportunities. Additionally,
changes in our customers spending patterns in each of the
industries we serve can cause an imbalance in supply and demand
and, therefore, affect margins and mix of revenues by industry
served.
Service and Maintenance versus
Installation. Installation work is often obtained
on a fixed price basis, while maintenance work is often
performed under pre-established or negotiated prices or
cost-plus pricing arrangements. Gross margins for installation
work may vary from project to project, and can be higher than
maintenance work, because work obtained on a fixed price basis
has higher risk than other types of pricing arrangements. We
typically derive approximately 50% of our annual revenues from
maintenance work, but a higher portion of installation work in
any given period may affect our gross margins for that period.
Subcontract Work. Work that is subcontracted
to other service providers generally yields lower gross margins.
An increase in subcontract work in a given period may contribute
to a decrease in gross margin. We typically subcontract
approximately 10% to 15% of our work to other service providers.
Materials versus Labor. Margins may be lower
on projects on which we furnish materials as our
mark-up on
materials is generally lower than on labor costs. In a given
period, a higher percentage of work that has a higher materials
component may decrease overall gross margin.
Depreciation. We include depreciation in cost
of services. This is common practice in our industry, but it can
make comparability to other companies difficult. This must be
taken into consideration when comparing us to other companies.
Insurance. Gross margins could be impacted by
fluctuations in insurance accruals as additional claims arise
and as circumstances and conditions of existing claims change.
We are insured for employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation claims. Through
July 31, 2009, employers liability claims were
subject to a deductible of $1.0 million per occurrence,
general liability and auto liability claims were subject to a
deductible of $3.0 million per occurrence, and
workers compensation claims were subject to a deductible
of $2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, through
July 31, 2009, our workers compensation claims were
subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability of up to
$1.0 million on claims in excess of $2.0 million per
occurrence. As of August 1, 2009, we renewed our
employers liability, general liability, auto liability and
workers compensation policies for the 2009 to 2010 policy
year. As a result of the renewal, the deductibles for all
policies have increased to $5.0 million per occurrence
other than employers liability, which is subject to a
deductible of $1.0 million. We also have employee health
care benefit plans for most employees not subject to collective
bargaining agreements, of which the primary plan is subject to a
deductible of $350,000 per claimant per year.
37
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of compensation and related benefits to management,
administrative salaries and benefits, marketing, office rent and
utilities, communications, professional fees, bad debt expense,
acquisition costs, gains and losses on the sale of property and
equipment, letter of credit fees and maintenance, training and
conversion costs related to the implementation of an information
technology solution.
Results
of Operations
The results of operations data below for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2008 has been
retrospectively restated in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position (FSP) FSP APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Settlement) (FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
470-20,
Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options). For more
details regarding how the adoption of FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20)
impacted Quantas consolidated financial statements, see
Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
The following table sets forth selected statements of operations
data and such data as a percentage of revenues for the three and
nine month periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Consolidated
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,053,355
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,858,679
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of services (including depreciation)
|
|
|
867,789
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
|
|
633,166
|
|
|
|
81.1
|
|
|
|
2,390,546
|
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
1,930,162
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
185,566
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
147,628
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
468,133
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
402,541
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
80,126
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
71,018
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
227,134
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
217,591
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,998
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
29,464
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
96,442
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
211,535
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
169,690
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,837
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(29,153
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(8,437
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
8,105
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
88,551
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
69,276
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
190,893
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
164,126
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
36,614
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
79,817
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
45,036
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
51,937
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
63,956
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
111,076
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
119,090
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
51,937
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
63,436
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
111,076
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2008
Consolidated
Results
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$272.6 million, or 25.9%, to $780.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. Electric power
infrastructure services revenues decreased $132.7 million,
or 20.6%, to $512.8 million, revenues from natural gas and
pipeline infrastructure services decreased $132.3 million,
or 50.1%, to $131.6 million, telecommunications
infrastructure services revenues decreased $13.1 million,
or 10.3%, to $114.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Overall, revenues were negatively
impacted by decreases in the number and size of projects as a
result of reduced capital spending by our customers. In
addition, electric power infrastructure services revenues were
also impacted by a decrease of approximately $110 million
in emergency restoration services, from approximately
$115 million in the third quarter of 2008 to approximately
38
$5 million in the third quarter of 2009, due to work
performed following hurricanes Fay, Gustav and Ike during the
third quarter of 2008 in the Gulf Coast region of the United
States. These decreases were partially offset by increased
revenues from fiber optic licensing of $5.5 million, or
32.9%, to $22.4 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2009. This increase in revenues is primarily
a result of our continued network expansion and the associated
revenues from licensing the right to use point-to-point fiber
optic telecommunications facilities.
Gross profit. Gross profit decreased
$37.9 million, or 20.4%, to $147.6 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in
gross profit resulted primarily from the effect of the decreased
revenues discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, gross
margin increased from 17.6% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 to 18.9% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of increased
revenues from our higher margin electric transmission services,
combined with improved margins in telecommunications
infrastructure services. Margins were negatively impacted in the
third quarter of 2008 from losses resulting from substantial
delays and productivity issues on a telecommunication project
which was completed by the end of 2008. Partially offsetting
these increases were decreases in margins from our natural gas
and pipeline services, primarily due to less ability to cover
fixed costs as a result of lower revenues, as well as lower
margins on certain gas transmission projects.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased $9.1 million, or 11.4%, to
$71.0 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009. The decrease in selling, general and administrative
expenses was primarily due to a decrease in professional fees of
approximately $3.1 million, which were higher in the third
quarter of 2008 because of certain renewable energy initiatives
as well as higher legal expenses due to litigation ongoing
during the period. Also contributing to the decrease were lower
salaries and benefits costs primarily associated with a decrease
in performance bonuses of approximately $2.3 million
resulting from current levels of operating activity, coupled
with lower bad debt expense of $1.2 million. Partially
offsetting these decreases were transaction costs of
approximately $1.3 million primarily associated with the
Price Gregory acquisition. As a percentage of revenues, selling,
general and administrative expenses increased from 7.6% to 9.1%
due primarily to less ability to cover fixed costs as a result
of the lower revenues earned in third quarter of 2009.
Amortization of intangible
assets. Amortization of intangible assets
decreased $3.6 million to $5.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily
due to the run-off of amortization associated with the backlog
acquired during 2007.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased
$7.0 million as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008, primarily due to the conversion,
redemption and repurchase of all outstanding 4.5% convertible
subordinated notes that occurred in September and early October
2008.
Interest income. Interest income was
$0.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
compared to $2.0 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease results primarily from
substantially lower interest rates partially offset by a higher
average cash balance for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $5.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, with an effective tax rate of 7.7%. The
provision for income taxes was $36.6 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, with an effective tax rate
of 41.3%. Quanta recorded tax benefits of $22.4 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 due to decreases
in reserves for uncertain tax benefits resulting from the
expiration of various federal and state statutes of limitations.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008
Consolidated
Results
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$526.0 million, or 18.4%, to $2.33 billion for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. Revenues from natural
gas and pipeline infrastructure services decreased
$217.2 million, or 33.4%, to $433.1 million, electric
power infrastructure services revenues decreased $184.4 or
10.6%, to $1.55 billion, telecommunications infrastructure
services revenues decreased $144.9 million, or 33.8%, to
$284.0 million for
39
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Overall, revenues
were negatively impacted by decreases in the number and size of
projects as a result of reduced capital spending by our
customers. Additionally, revenues from electric power
infrastructure services were also impacted by a decrease of
approximately $95 million in emergency restoration
services, from approximately $160 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to approximately
$65 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, due to work performed following hurricanes Fay, Gustav and
Ike during the third quarter of 2008 in the Gulf Coast region of
the United States. These decreases were partially offset by
increased revenues from fiber optic licensing of
$20.5 million, 47.2% to $64.0 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. This increase in revenues
is primarily a result of our continued network expansion and the
associated revenues from licensing the right to use
point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities.
Gross profit. Gross profit decreased
$65.6 million, or 14.0%, to $402.5 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in gross
profit resulted primarily from the effect of the decreased
revenues discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, gross
margin increased from 16.4% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to 17.3% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of increased
revenues from our higher margin electric transmission services
combined with improved margins in telecommunications
infrastructure services. Gross margins for our
telecommunications infrastructure services were negatively
affected in the 2008 period by losses on a project ongoing
during that period which resulted from substantial delays and
productivity issues on the project. In addition, gross margins
were favorably impacted by increased fiber optic licensing
revenues, which typically generate higher gross margins than our
other services. Partially offsetting these increases were
decreases in margins from our natural gas and pipeline services,
primarily due to less ability to cover fixed costs as a result
of lower revenues, as well as lower margins on certain gas
transmission projects.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased $9.5 million, or 4.2%, to
$217.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The decrease in selling, general and administrative
expenses was due to lower salaries and benefits costs primarily
associated with a decrease in performance bonuses of
approximately $6.6 million resulting from current levels of
operating activity, coupled with a reduction in bad debt expense
of $2.1 million and a decrease in professional fees of
approximately $1.4 million which were higher in the 2008
period because of consulting services associated with renewable
energy initiatives and higher legal expenses due to ongoing
litigation. Partially offsetting this decrease were transaction
costs of $1.3 million primarily associated with the
acquisition of Price Gregory. As a percentage of revenues,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 7.9%
to 9.3% due to less ability to cover fixed costs as result of
lower revenues earned in 2009.
Amortization of intangible
assets. Amortization of intangible assets
decreased $14.2 million to $15.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily
due to the run-off of amortization associated with the backlog
acquired during 2007.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased
$20.7 million as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, primarily due to the conversion,
redemption and repurchase of all outstanding 4.5% convertible
subordinated notes that occurred in September and early October
2008.
Interest income. Interest income was
$2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, compared to $8.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease results primarily from
substantially lower interest rates partially offset by a higher
average cash balance for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $45.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, with an effective tax rate of 27.4%.
The provision for income taxes was $79.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, with an effective tax
rate of 41.8%. The lower effective tax rate for 2009 results
from $22.4 million of tax benefits recorded in 2009
associated with the reversal of tax contingencies. Excluding
these discrete period benefits, the provision for income taxes
was $67.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, with an effective tax rate of 41.1%
40
Segment
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
645,511
|
|
|
|
61.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
512,797
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,735,906
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,551,496
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
%
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
263,955
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
131,628
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
650,373
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
433,138
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
127,060
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
113,998
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
428,899
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
284,024
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
16,829
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
22,371
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
43,501
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
64,045
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,053,355
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,858,679
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
82,506
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
184,294
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
178,768
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
27,030
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
51,255
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
32,579
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
18,684
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
9,195
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
11,757
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
32,023
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Corporate and non-allocated costs
|
|
|
(25,259
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(21,787
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(79,884
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(67,942
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income
|
|
$
|
96,442
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
211,535
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
169,690
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2008
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $132.7 million, or
20.6%, to $512.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Revenues were negatively impacted by a
decrease of approximately $110 million in emergency
restoration services, from approximately $114 million in
the third quarter of 2008 to approximately $4 million in
the third quarter of 2009, as a result of work performed
following hurricanes Fay, Gustav and Ike during the third
quarter of 2008 in the Gulf Coast region of the United States.
Emergency restoration services associated with hurricanes did
not occur in the third quarter of 2009 as no major hurricanes
impacted the United States. Revenues were also negatively
impacted by a decrease in electric power distribution services
and other electric power infrastructure service revenues,
primarily from reduced service work and capital spending by our
customers, which was partially offset by increased revenues from
electric transmission services related to an increased number of
larger projects being performed in the third quarter of 2009.
Operating income decreased $15.7 million, or 19.1%, for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is
primarily due to the reduced revenues discussed above. Operating
income as a percentage of revenues increased from 12.8% for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 to 13.0% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. Although there was a
substantial decrease in emergency restoration services, which
typically generate higher margins, the increased contribution
from higher margin electric transmission services as well as
generally higher margins for other services in this segment
offset this decrease. In addition, general and administrative
expenses decreased approximately $6.4 million primarily due
to lower salary and benefits expense associated with lower
performance bonuses resulting from current levels of operating
activity.
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $132.3 million, or
50.1%, to $131.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. Revenues were negatively impacted by a
decrease of approximately $100 million in transmission
pipeline services due to larger projects that were in progress
in the third quarter of 2008 versus the third quarter of 2009.
In addition, gas distribution services decreased approximately
$26 million when compared to the third quarter of 2008 due
to reduction in the number and size of projects as a result of
reduced capital spending by our customers.
Operating income decreased $24.9 million to
$2.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, primarily as a result of the decreased revenues discussed
above. Operating income as a percentage of revenues decreased
from 10.2% to 1.6% for the three months ended September 30,
2009. The decreases are due to lower
41
overall revenues and the related impact on this segments
ability to cover fixed costs during the 2009 period, as well as
lower margins on a transmission pipeline services project due
primarily to the negative effect on productivity from the
substantial rainfall that occurred during the third quarter of
2009.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $13.1 million, or
10.3%, to $114.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 primarily due to reduced capital
spending for fiber build-out initiatives by a significant
telecommunications customer. For the three months ended
September 30, 2009, revenues from this customer for fiber
build-out initiatives were $7 million as compared to
approximately $22 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. Excluding the effects of the decrease
in spending from this customer, telecommunications
infrastructure service revenues remained relatively constant as
compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Operating income increased $9.3 million to
$12.3 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009. During the three months ended September 30, 2008,
substantial delays and productivity issues associated with a
telecommunications project resulted in a $7.7 million
operating loss on that project during the period. This project
was completed in 2008 and therefore had no effect on the three
months ended September 30, 2009. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues increased from 2.3% in last years
third quarter to 10.8% for third quarter of 2009, primarily due
to the effects of this project.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment Results
Revenues for this segment increased from $16.8 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 to
$22.4 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009. This increase in revenues is primarily a result of our
continued network expansion and the associated revenues from
licensing the right to use
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities.
Operating income for the three months ended September 30,
2009 increased $2.6 million to $11.8 million due to
the increased revenues discussed above. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues decreased from 54.6% to 52.6% primarily
as a result of the timing of various system maintenance costs.
Corporate
and Non-allocated Costs
Certain selling, general and administrative expenses and
amortization of intangible assets are not allocated to segments.
Corporate and non-allocated costs for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 decreased $3.5 million to
$21.8 million primarily due to a decrease in amortization
of intangible assets of $3.6 million related to the run-off
of backlog from previous acquisitions and lower salaries and
benefits expense associated with lower performance bonuses
resulting from current levels of operating activity. Partially
offsetting this decrease were transaction costs of approximately
$1.3 million incurred in the third quarter of 2009
primarily related to the Price Gregory acquisition.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $184.4 million, or
10.6%, to $1.55 billion for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Revenues were negatively impacted by a
decrease of approximately $94 million in emergency
restoration services, from approximately $160 million in
the first nine months of 2008 to approximately $64 million
for the first nine months of 2009. This decrease is due
primarily to work following hurricanes in the Gulf Coast region
of the United States during 2008 which was partially offset by
emergency restoration services related to ice storms in the
first quarter of 2009. Emergency restoration services associated
with these hurricanes continued into the first quarter of 2009;
however, no major hurricanes impacted the United States during
the first nine months of 2009. Revenues were also negatively
impacted by a decrease in electric power distribution services
and other electric power infrastructure service revenues
primarily from reduced service work and capital spending by our
customers, which was partially offset by increased revenues from
electric transmission services related to an increased number of
larger projects being performed in the first nine months of
2009.
42
Operating income decreased $5.5 million, or 3.0%, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is due
to the reduced revenues discussed above. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues increased from 10.6% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 to 11.5% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Although there was a substantial
decrease in emergency restoration services, which typically
generate higher margins, the increased contribution from higher
margin electric transmission services as well as generally
higher margins for other services in this segment offset this
decrease. In addition, general and administrative expenses
decreased approximately $5.9 million primarily due to
decreased salaries and benefits expense associated with lower
performance bonuses resulting from current levels of operating
activity.
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $217.2 million, or
33.4%, to $433.1 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Revenues were negatively impacted by a
decrease of approximately $159 million in transmission
pipeline services due to larger projects that were in progress
in the first nine months of 2008 versus the first nine months of
2009. In addition, gas distribution services decreased
approximately $55 million due to reductions in the number
and size of projects as a result of reduced capital spending by
our customers.
Operating income decreased $43.1 million to
$8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, as a result of the decreased revenues discussed above.
Operating income as a percentage of revenues decreased from 7.9%
to 1.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
decreases are due to lower overall revenues and the related
impact on this segments ability to cover fixed costs
during the 2009 period, as well as lower margins on a
transmission pipeline services project due primarily to the
negative affect on productivity from the substantial rainfall
that occurred during the second and third quarter of 2009.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $144.9 million, or
33.8%, to $284.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 due to reduced capital spending by a
significant telecommunications customer for fiber build-out
initiatives. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
revenues from this customer were $20 million as compared to
approximately $100 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. Revenues were also negatively impacted
by a decrease in the number and size of projects as a result of
reduced capital spending by our customers in the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008.
Operating income decreased $13.9 million to
$18.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, as a result of the decreased revenues discussed above.
Operating income as a percentage of revenues decreased from 7.6%
for the nine months ended September 2008 to 6.6% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is a result
of the lower overall revenues and the related impact on this
segments ability to cover fixed costs during the 2009
period.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment Results
Revenues for this segment increased from $43.5 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to
$64.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. This increase in revenues is primarily a result of our
continued network expansion and the associated revenues from
licensing the right to use
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities.
Operating income for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 increased $8.7 million to $32.0 million due to
the increased revenues discussed above. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues decreased from 53.5% to 50.0% primarily
as a result of the timing of various system maintenance costs.
Corporate
and Non-allocated Costs
Certain selling, general and administrative expenses and
amortization of intangible assets are not allocated to segments.
Corporate and
non-allocated
costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
decreased $11.9 million to $67.9 million primarily due
to a decrease in amortization of intangible assets of
$14.2 million related to the run-off of backlog from
previous acquisitions and lower salaries and benefits expense
associated with lower
43
performance bonuses resulting from current levels of operating
activity. Partially offsetting these decreases were transaction
costs of approximately $1.3 million, primarily related to
the Price Gregory acquisition.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Requirements
We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, which
totaled $584.0 million as of September 30, 2009,
existing borrowing capacity under our credit facility, and our
future cash flows from operations will provide sufficient funds
to enable us to meet our future operating needs, debt service
requirements and planned capital expenditures, as well as
facilitate our ability to grow in the foreseeable future.
Management assesses our liquidity in terms of our ability to
generate cash to fund our operating, investing and financing
activities. Increased demand for services resulting from, for
example, initiatives to rebuild the United States electric power
grid, expand the North America pipeline transmission
infrastructure or support renewable energy projects may require
a significant amount of additional working capital. We also
evaluate opportunities for strategic acquisitions from time to
time that may require cash.
Management continues to monitor the financial markets and
general national and global economic conditions. If further
changes in financial markets or other areas of the economy
adversely impacted our ability to access capital markets, we
would expect to rely on a combination of available cash and
borrowing capacity under our credit facility to provide
short-term funding. We consider our cash investment policies to
be conservative in that we maintain a diverse portfolio of what
we believe to be high-quality cash investments with short-term
maturities. We were in compliance with our covenants under our
credit facility at September 30, 2009. Accordingly, we do
not anticipate that the volatility in the capital markets will
have a material impact on the principal amounts of our cash
investments or our ability to rely upon our existing credit
facility for funds. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack
of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we
can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and
cash equivalents will not be impacted in the future by adverse
conditions in the financial markets.
Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately
$170 million for 2009. Approximately $85 million of
expected 2009 capital expenditures are targeted for the
expansion of our fiber optic network, primarily in connection
with committed customer arrangements.
On October 1, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding
stock of Price Gregory through the Merger. In connection with
the Merger, we issued approximately 10.9 million shares of
our common stock valued at approximately $231.8 million and
paid approximately $95.8 million in cash to the
stockholders of Price Gregory.
Our 3.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2026
(3.75% Notes) are not presently convertible into our common
stock, although they have been convertible in certain prior
quarters as a result of the satisfaction of the market price
condition described in further detail in Debt
Instruments 3.75% Convertible Subordinated
Notes below. The 3.75% Notes could become
convertible in future periods upon the satisfaction of the
market price condition or other conditions. If any holder of the
convertible notes requests to convert their notes, we have the
option to deliver cash, shares of our common stock or a
combination thereof, with the amount of cash determined in
accordance with the terms of the indenture under which the notes
were issued.
Sources
and Uses of Cash
As of September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents
of $584.0 million, working capital of $1.01 billion
and long-term obligations of $125.5 million, net of current
maturities. The long-term obligations are our 3.75% Notes,
which have an aggregate principal amount of $143.8 million.
We also had $183.9 million of letters of credit outstanding
under our credit facility, leaving $291.1 million available
for revolving loans or issuing new letters of credit.
Operating
Activities
Cash flow from operations is primarily influenced by demand for
our services, operating margins and the type of services we
provide, but can also be influenced by working capital needs
such as the timing of collection of receivables and the
settlement of payables and other obligations. Working capital
needs are generally higher during
44
the summer and fall months due to increased services in weather
affected regions of the country. Conversely, working capital
assets are typically converted to cash during the winter months.
Operating activities provided net cash to us of
$108.0 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to $16.8 million in the
three months ended September 30, 2008. Operating activities
provided net cash to us of $278.6 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to
$50.1 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The increase in operating cash flows for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
same period in 2008 is primarily due to collections of accounts
receivable and retainage that were outstanding at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, coupled with reduced overall
working capital needs in 2009 associated with lower levels of
operating activity. Cash flow for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was also negatively impacted by
higher working capital requirements as we performed significant
emergency restoration services as a result of the hurricanes in
the Gulf Coast region and higher working capital requirements
associated with invoice processing issues by a certain customer
as a result of the rapid
ramp-up of
FTTx and wireless installations over the twelve months prior to
September 30, 2008. The specific telecommunications work
that was being performed had voluminous billing requirements and
had been subject to lengthy delays as our invoices worked their
way through the customers payment system. By the fourth
quarter of 2008, these collection delays had been resolved.
Investing
Activities
In the three months ended September 30, 2009, we used net
cash in investing activities of $48.1 million as compared
to $54.5 million used in investing activities in the three
months ended September 30, 2008. Investing activities in
the third quarter of 2009 included $36.0 million used for
capital expenditures and $14.1 million in net cash outlays
for acquisitions, partially offset by $2.1 million of
proceeds from the sale of equipment. Investing activities in the
third quarter of 2008 included $51.8 million used for
capital expenditures, $4.8 million in net cash outlays for
acquisitions, partially offset by $2.1 million of proceeds
from the sale of equipment.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we used net
cash in investing activities of $130.2 million as compared
to $196.1 million used in investing activities in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Investing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included
$120.9 million used for capital expenditures and
$14.1 million in net cash outlays for acquisitions,
partially offset by $4.8 million of proceeds from the sale
of equipment. Investing activities in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 included $164.9 million used for
capital expenditures, $27.7 million in net cash outlays for
acquisitions and $14.6 million paid to secure patents and
developed technology, partially offset by $11.1 million of
proceeds from the sale of equipment.
Financing
Activities
In the three months ended September 30, 2009, financing
activities provided net cash flow of $0.6 million as
compared to $0.6 million provided by financing activities
in the three months ended September 30, 2008. The
$0.6 million provided by financing activities in the three
months ended September 30, 2009 resulted primarily from a
$0.5 million received from the exercise of stock options and
$0.1 million tax benefit from the vesting of stock-based
equity awards. The $0.6 million provided by financing
activities in the three months ended September 30, 2008
resulted primarily from $0.3 million received from the
exercise of stock options and $0.3 million of tax benefit
from stock-based equity awards.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, financing
activities used net cash flow of $2.1 million as compared
to $7.6 million provided by financing activities in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The $2.1 million
used in financing activities in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 resulted primarily from a
$1.6 million tax impact from the vesting of stock-based
equity awards and the exercise of stock options, coupled with
$1.2 million in net repayments of borrowings. The
$7.6 million provided by financing activities in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 resulted primarily from
$6.0 million received from the exercise of stock options.
Also contributing to the inflow was $2.6 million of tax
benefit from stock-based equity awards, partially offset by
$1.0 million of payments on other long-term debt, net of
proceeds.
45
Debt
Instruments
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility with various lenders that provides for
a $475.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility
maturing on September 19, 2012. Subject to the conditions
specified in the credit facility, borrowings under the credit
facility are to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The entire
unused portion of the credit facility is available for the
issuance of letters of credit.
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately
$183.9 million of letters of credit issued under the credit
facility and no outstanding revolving loans. The remaining
$291.1 million was available for revolving loans or issuing
new letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit
facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either
(a) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit facility)
plus 0.875% to 1.75%, as determined by the ratio of our total
funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit
facility), or (b) the base rate (as described below) plus
0.00% to 0.75%, as determined by the ratio of our total funded
debt to consolidated EBITDA. Letters of credit issued under the
credit facility are subject to a letter of credit fee of 0.875%
to 1.75%, based on the ratio of our total funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA. We are also subject to a commitment fee of
0.15% to 0.35%, based on the ratio of our total funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA, on any unused availability under the credit
facility. The base rate equals the higher of (i) the
Federal Funds Rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus
1/2
of 1% or (ii) the banks prime rate.
The credit facility contains certain covenants, including
covenants with respect to maximum funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, maximum senior debt to consolidated EBITDA and minimum
interest coverage, in each case as specified in the credit
facility. For purposes of calculating the maximum funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio and the maximum senior debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio, our maximum funded debt and maximum
senior debt are reduced by all cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the credit facility) held by us in excess of
$25.0 million. As of September 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with all of its covenants. The credit facility limits
certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, capital
expenditures, asset sales and prepayments of indebtedness and,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits liens on material
assets. The credit facility also limits the payment of dividends
and stock repurchase programs in any fiscal year except those
payments or other distributions payable solely in capital stock.
The credit facility provides for customary events of default and
carries cross-default provisions with all of our existing
subordinated notes, our continuing indemnity and security
agreement with our sureties and all of our other debt
instruments exceeding $15.0 million in borrowings. If an
event of default (as defined in the credit facility) occurs and
is continuing, on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the credit facility, amounts outstanding under the
credit facility may be accelerated and may become or be declared
immediately due and payable.
The credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital
stock of our U.S. subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of
our foreign subsidiaries and substantially all of our assets.
Our U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the repayment of all
amounts due under the credit facility. Our obligations under the
credit facility constitute designated senior indebtedness under
our 3.75% Notes.
3.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
At September 30, 2009, we had outstanding
$143.8 million aggregate principal amount of the
3.75% Notes. The resale of the notes and the shares
issuable upon conversion thereof was registered for the benefit
of the holders in a shelf registration statement filed with the
SEC. The 3.75% Notes mature on April 30, 2026 and bear
interest at the annual rate of 3.75%, payable semi-annually on
April 30 and October 30, until maturity.
The $122.3 million and $125.5 million of convertible
subordinated notes on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 is presented
net of a debt discount of $21.5 million and
$18.3 million, which is amortized as interest expense over
the remaining amortization period. This debt discount was
recorded in accordance with the January 1, 2009 adoption of
FSP APB 14-1
(ASC 470-20)
as discussed in
46
Notes 1 and 3 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements. The effective interest rate used to calculate total
interest expense for the 3.75% Notes under FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20) was
7.85%. At September 30, 2009, the remaining amortization
period for the debt discount, which continues until the first
repurchase right on April 30, 2013, is approximately
3.6 years.
The 3.75% Notes are convertible into our common stock,
based on an initial conversion rate of 44.6229 shares of
our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 3.75% Notes
(which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately
$22.41 per share), subject to adjustment as a result of certain
events. The 3.75% Notes are convertible by the holder
(i) during any fiscal quarter if the closing price of our
common stock is greater than 130% of the conversion price for at
least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading
days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding
fiscal quarter, (ii) upon us calling the 3.75% Notes
for redemption, (iii) upon the occurrence of specified
distributions to holders of our common stock or specified
corporate transactions or (iv) at any time on or after
March 1, 2026 until the business day immediately preceding
the maturity date of the 3.75% Notes. The 3.75% Notes
are not presently convertible, although they have been
convertible in certain prior quarters as a result of the
satisfaction of the market price condition in clause (i)
above. If the 3.75% Notes become convertible under any of
these circumstances, we have the option to deliver cash, shares
of our common stock or a combination thereof, with the amount of
cash determined in accordance with the terms of the indenture
under which the notes were issued. Conversions that may occur in
the future could result in the recording of losses on
extinguishment of debt if the conversions are settled in cash
for an amount in excess of the principal amount. The holders of
the 3.75% Notes who convert their notes in connection with
certain change in control transactions, as defined in the
indenture, may be entitled to a make whole premium in the form
of an increase in the conversion rate. In the event of a change
in control, in lieu of paying holders a make whole premium, if
applicable, we may elect, in some circumstances, to adjust the
conversion rate and related conversion obligations so that the
3.75% Notes are convertible into shares of the acquiring or
surviving company.
Beginning on April 30, 2010 until April 30, 2013, we
may redeem for cash all or part of the 3.75% Notes at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if the closing price of our common stock is
equal to or greater than 130% of the conversion price then in
effect for the 3.75% Notes for at least 20 trading days in
the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the trading day
immediately prior to the date of mailing of the notice of
redemption. In addition, we may redeem for cash all or part of
the 3.75% Notes at any time on or after April 30, 2010
at certain redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing on
April 30, 2010, and for each six-month interest period
thereafter, we will be required to pay contingent interest on
any outstanding 3.75% Notes during the applicable interest
period if the average trading price of the 3.75% Notes
during the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding
the last trading day before commencement of the applicable
interest period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount
of the notes. The contingent interest payable within any
applicable interest period will equal an annual rate of 0.25% of
the average trading price of the 3.75% Notes during a five
trading day reference period.
The holders of the 3.75% Notes may require us to repurchase
all or a part of the notes in cash on each of April 30,
2013, April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2021, and in the
event of a change in control of the company, as defined in the
indenture, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the 3.75% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The 3.75% Notes carry cross-default provisions with our
other debt instruments exceeding $20.0 million in
borrowings, which includes our existing credit facility.
4.5% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
During 2008, the holders of $269.8 million aggregate
principal amount of 4.5% convertible subordinated notes due 2023
(4.5% Notes) elected to convert their notes, resulting in
the issuance of 24,229,781 shares of our common stock,
substantially all of which followed a notice of redemption that
we would redeem on October 8, 2008 all of the
4.5% Notes outstanding pursuant to the indenture governing
the notes. We also repurchased $106,000 aggregate principal
amount of the 4.5% Notes on October 1, 2008 pursuant
to the holders election and redeemed for cash $49,000
aggregate principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, on October 8, 2008. As a result of all of these
transactions, none of the 4.5% Notes remained outstanding
as of October 8, 2008. The 4.5% Notes were originally
issued in October 2003 for an aggregate principal amount of
$270.0 million and required semi-annual interest payments
on April 1 and October 1 until maturity.
47
Off-Balance
Sheet Transactions
As is common in our industry, we have entered into certain
off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business that result in risks not directly reflected in our
balance sheets. Our significant off-balance sheet transactions
include liabilities associated with non-cancelable operating
leases, letter of credit obligations, commitments to expand our
fiber optic networks, surety guarantees, multi-employer pension
plan liabilities and obligations relating to our joint venture
arrangements. During the first quarter of 2009, two of our
operating units began operating in separate joint venture
structures which contain risks not directly reflected in our
balance sheets. In association with one of these joint ventures,
we have guaranteed all of the obligations of the joint venture
under the contract with the customer. Additionally, our second
joint venture arrangement qualifies as a general partnership,
for which we are jointly and severally liable for all of the
obligations of the joint venture. In each of these joint venture
arrangements, each joint venturer has indemnified the other
party for any liabilities incurred in excess of the liabilities
for which the joint venturer is obligated to bear under the
respective joint venture agreement. Other than as previously
discussed, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet
financing arrangements through special purpose entities, and we
have no other material guarantees of the work or obligations of
third parties.
Leases
We enter into non-cancelable operating leases for many of our
facility, vehicle and equipment needs. These leases allow us to
conserve cash by paying a monthly lease rental fee for use of
facilities, vehicles and equipment rather than purchasing them.
We may decide to cancel or terminate a lease before the end of
its term, in which case we are typically liable to the lessor
for the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease.
We have guaranteed the residual value of the underlying assets
under certain of our equipment operating leases at the date of
termination of such leases. We have agreed to pay any difference
between this residual value and the fair market value of each
underlying asset as of the lease termination date. As of
September 30, 2009, the maximum guaranteed residual value
was approximately $141.2 million. We believe that no
significant payments will be made as a result of the difference
between the fair market value of the leased equipment and the
guaranteed residual value. However, there can be no assurance
that future significant payments will not be required.
Letters
of Credit
Certain of our vendors require letters of credit to ensure
reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on our behalf,
such as to beneficiaries under our self-funded insurance
programs. In addition, from time to time some customers require
us to post letters of credit to ensure payment to our
subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to
guarantee performance under our contracts. Such letters of
credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial
institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay
specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit if the
holder demonstrates that we have failed to perform specified
actions. If this were to occur, we would be required to
reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. Depending on the
circumstances of such a reimbursement, we may also have to
record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. We do not
believe that it is likely that any claims will be made under a
letter of credit in the foreseeable future.
As of September 30, 2009, we had $183.9 million in
letters of credit outstanding under our credit facility
primarily to secure obligations under our casualty insurance
program. These are irrevocable stand-by letters of credit with
maturities generally expiring at various times throughout 2009
and 2010. Upon maturity, it is expected that the majority of
these letters of credit will be renewed for subsequent one-year
periods.
Performance
Bonds and Parent Guarantees
Many customers, particularly in connection with new
construction, require us to post performance and payment bonds
issued by a financial institution known as a surety. These bonds
provide a guarantee to the customer that we will perform under
the terms of a contract and that we will pay subcontractors and
vendors. If we fail to perform under a contract or to pay
subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the
surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must
reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs.
Under our continuing indemnity and security agreement with our
sureties and with the consent of our lenders under our credit
facility, we have granted security interests in certain of our
assets to collateralize our obligations to the
48
sureties. In addition, under our agreement with the surety that
issued bonds on behalf of InfraSource, which remains in place
for any bonds that were outstanding under it on August 30,
2007 and have not expired or been replaced, we will be required
to transfer to the surety certain of our assets as collateral in
the event of a default under the agreement. We may be required
to post letters of credit or other collateral in favor of the
sureties or our customers in the future. Posting letters of
credit in favor of the sureties or our customers would reduce
the borrowing availability under our credit facility. To date,
we have not been required to make any reimbursements to our
sureties for bond-related costs. We believe that it is unlikely
that we will have to fund significant claims under our surety
arrangements in the foreseeable future. As of September 30,
2009, the total amount of outstanding performance bonds was
approximately $725.3 million, and the estimated cost to
complete these bonded projects was approximately
$225.8 million.
From time to time, we guarantee the obligations of our wholly
owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain
contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and, in some
states, obligations in connection with obtaining
contractors licenses. We have also guaranteed the
obligations of our wholly owned subsidiary under the joint
venture arrangement with a third party engineering company
entered into in the first quarter of 2009, which is described in
Notes 2, 9 and 11 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Contractual
Obligations
As of September 30, 2009, our future contractual
obligations are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
of 2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Long-term obligations principal
|
|
$
|
143,787
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term obligations interest
|
|
|
19,316
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
143,451
|
|
|
|
14,606
|
|
|
|
43,462
|
|
|
|
32,236
|
|
|
|
21,789
|
|
|
|
15,841
|
|
|
|
15,517
|
|
Committed capital expenditures for fiber optic networks under
contracts with customers
|
|
|
24,955
|
|
|
|
12,852
|
|
|
|
12,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
331,509
|
|
|
$
|
28,809
|
|
|
$
|
60,973
|
|
|
$
|
37,644
|
|
|
$
|
27,180
|
|
|
$
|
161,386
|
|
|
$
|
15,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities of our long-term obligations may differ from
contractual maturities because convertible note holders may
convert their notes prior to the maturity dates or subsequent to
optional maturity dates. Additionally, the $143.8 million
aggregate principal amount above differs from the
$125.5 million of convertible subordinated notes on the
consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 due to
the balance sheet amount being presented net of a discount of
$18.3 million.
The committed capital expenditures for fiber optic networks
represent commitments related to signed contracts with
customers. The amounts are estimates of costs required to build
the networks under contract. The actual capital expenditures
related to building the networks could vary materially from
these estimates.
As of September 30, 2009, the total unrecognized tax
benefit related to uncertain tax positions was
$43.3 million. We estimate that none of this will be paid
within the next twelve months. However, we believe that it is
reasonably possible that within the next twelve months
unrecognized tax benefits may decrease up to $10.2 million
due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations. We are
unable to make reasonably reliable estimates regarding the
timing of future cash outflows, if any, associated with the
remaining unrecognized tax benefits.
Our multi-employer pension plan contributions are determined
annually based on our union employee payrolls, which cannot be
determined in advance for future periods. We may also be
required to make additional contributions to our multi-employer
pension plans if they become underfunded.
Self-Insurance
We are insured for employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation claims. Through
July 31, 2009, employers liability claims were
subject to a deductible of $1.0 million per occurrence,
49
general liability and auto liability claims were subject to a
deductible of $3.0 million per occurrence, and
workers compensation claims were subject to a deductible
of $2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, through
July 31, 2009, our workers compensation claims were
subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability of up to
$1.0 million on claims in excess of $2.0 million per
occurrence. As of August 1, 2009, we renewed our
employers liability, general liability, auto liability and
workers compensation policies for the 2009 to 2010 policy
year. As a result of the renewal, the deductibles for all
policies have increased to $5.0 million per occurrence,
other than employers liability, which is subject to a
deductible of $1.0 million. Additionally, in connection with
this renewal, the amount of letters of credit required to secure
our obligations under our casualty insurance program, which is
discussed above, has increased. We also have employee health
care benefit plans for most employees not subject to collective
bargaining agreements, of which the primary plan is subject to a
deductible of $350,000 per claimant per year.
Losses under all of these insurance programs are accrued based
upon our estimate of the ultimate liability for claims reported
and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, with
assistance from third-party actuaries. These insurance
liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due to unknown
factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination
of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of
incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety
program. The accruals are based upon known facts and historical
trends and management believes such accruals to be adequate. As
of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, the gross
amount accrued for insurance claims totaled $147.9 million
and $143.9 million, with $105.0 million and
$103.1 million considered to be long-term and included in
other non-current liabilities. Related insurance
recoveries/receivables as of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009 were $12.5 million and
$13.4 million, of which $7.2 million and
$6.9 million are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $5.3 million and $6.5 million are
included in other assets, net.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
We are subject to concentrations of credit risk related
primarily to our cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. Substantially all of our cash investments are
managed by what we believe to be high credit quality financial
institutions. In accordance with our investment policies, these
institutions are authorized to invest this cash in a diversified
portfolio of what we believe to be high quality investments,
which primarily include interest-bearing demand deposits, money
market mutual funds and investment grade commercial paper with
original maturities of three months or less. Although we do not
currently believe the principal amount of these investments is
subject to any material risk of loss, the recent volatility in
the financial markets is likely to continue to significantly
impact the interest income we receive from these investments. In
addition, we grant credit under normal payment terms, generally
without collateral, to our customers, which include electric
power and gas companies, telecommunications and cable television
system operators, governmental entities, general contractors,
and builders, owners and managers of commercial and industrial
properties located primarily in the United States. Consequently,
we are subject to potential credit risk related to changes in
business and economic factors throughout the United States,
which may be heightened as a result of the current financial
crisis and volatility of the markets. However, we generally have
certain statutory lien rights with respect to services provided.
Under certain circumstances, such as foreclosures or negotiated
settlements, we may take title to the underlying assets in lieu
of cash in settlement of receivables. In such circumstances,
extended time frames may be required to liquidate these assets,
causing the amounts realized to differ from the value of the
assumed receivable. Historically, some of our customers have
experienced significant financial difficulties, and others may
experience financial difficulties in the future. These
difficulties expose us to increased risk related to
collectability of receivables for services we have performed. No
customers represented 10% or more of revenues during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 or 2009 or of
accounts receivable as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
Litigation
We are from time to time party to various lawsuits, claims and
other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any
of
50
these proceedings, separately or in the aggregate, would be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Related
Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we enter into transactions
from time to time with related parties. These transactions
typically take the form of facility leases with prior owners of
certain acquired companies and payables to prior owners who are
now employees.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. On
January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20),
which requires issuers of certain convertible debt instruments
to separately account for the liability and equity components in
a manner that adjusts the recorded value of the convertible debt
to reflect the entitys non-convertible debt borrowing rate
and interest cost at the time of issuance. The value of the debt
instrument is adjusted through a discount to the face value of
the debt, which is amortized as non-cash interest expense over
the expected life of the debt, with an offsetting adjustment to
equity to separately recognize the value of the debt
instruments conversion feature. FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20) has
been applied retrospectively to all periods presented.
Accordingly, we recorded a cumulative effect of the change in
accounting principle to accumulated deficit as of
January 1, 2007 of approximately $29.6 million. Also
included in accumulated deficit is the impact from non-cash
interest expense recorded in the amounts of approximately
$18.3 million ($11.8 million after tax effect) and
$14.9 million ($9.6 million after tax effect) for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008. In addition, we
recorded non-cash interest expense during the first, second and
third quarters of 2009 and will continue doing so until our
3.75% convertible subordinated notes are redeemable at the
holders option in April 2013. Approximately
$4.3 million ($2.8 million after tax effect) non-cash
interest expense will be recorded in 2009, with approximately
$1.1 million ($0.7 million after tax effect) recorded
in each of the first, second and third quarters of 2009. See the
tables in Note 3 of our condensed consolidated financial
statements for the impact of FSP APB
14-1 (ASC
470-20) as
of December 31, 2008 and for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP
EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (ASC
260, Earnings Per Share). FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) states that unvested share-based payment awards
that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities and should be included in the computation of both
basic and diluted earnings per share. All prior period earnings
per share data presented have been adjusted retrospectively to
conform to the provisions of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260). All of our restricted stock grants have
non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered
participating securities under FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260). Prior to the retrospective application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) on January 1, 2009, unvested restricted
stock grants were included in the calculation of weighted
average dilutive shares outstanding using the treasury stock
method. Under this previous method, unvested restricted common
shares were not included in the calculation of weighted average
basic shares outstanding but were included in the calculation of
weighted average diluted shares outstanding to the extent the
grant price was less than the average share price for the
respective period. The impact of the retrospective application
of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) on earnings per share for prior periods is
immaterial. Additionally, the adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) had no material impact on basic and diluted
income per share in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009. See Note 3 to our condensed
consolidated financial statements for the impact of adopting FSP
EITF 03-6-1
(ASC 260) for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in
a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (ASC
805, Business Combinations). FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC
805) amends the provisions related to the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination under SFAS No. 141(R) (ASC
805) and has the same effective date as
SFAS No. 141(R) (ASC 805). Accordingly, we adopted FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) effective January 1, 2009.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) carries forward the
requirements in SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, which is now superseded, for acquired
contingencies, which requires that such contingencies be
recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value
can be reasonably estimated
51
during the measurement period. Otherwise, companies should
typically account for the acquired contingencies in accordance
with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies (ASC 450, Contingencies). FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) also amends the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 141(R) (ASC 805) to
require separate disclosure of recognized and unrecognized
contingencies if certain conditions are met. FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 (ASC 805) had no material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash
flows or disclosures during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
On January 1, 2009, we fully adopted
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (ASC
820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures).
SFAS No. 157 (ASC 820) defines fair value,
establishes methods used to measure fair value and expands
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements with
respect to financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.
The adoption of SFAS No. 157 (ASC 820) did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations, cash flows or disclosures. In April 2009,
the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (ASC
820-10-35-51),
which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value
when an entity determines that either the volume
and/or level
of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased. FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
also provides guidance to identify circumstances that indicate
when a transaction is not orderly. FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We
adopted FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The adoption of FSP
FAS 157-4
(ASC
820-10-35-51)
did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we adopted FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (ASC
825-10-65,
Financial Instruments Overall
Transition). FSP
FAS 107-1
(ASC
825-10-65)
requires public entities to provide the disclosures required by
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments (ASC 825, Financial
Instruments) on a quarterly basis and is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
early adoption permitted in certain circumstances for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. Because we have been providing
these disclosures in our quarterly reports prior to the issuance
of FSP
FAS 107-1
(ASC
825-10-65),
the adoption of FSP
FAS 107-1
(ASC
825-10-65)
did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we adopted FSP
FAS 115-2
and
FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (ASC
320-10-65-1,
Investment Debt and Equity Securities
Overall Transition). FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
establishes a new method of recognizing and reporting
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities. FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
also contains additional disclosure requirements related to debt
and equity securities. FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Because we have not held any debt or equity securities that
would be within the scope of FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
since its adoption, the adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2
(ASC
320-10-65-1)
did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we adopted
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (ASC 855,
Subsequent Events). Although SFAS No. 165 (ASC
855) should not result in significant changes in the
subsequent events an entity reports, it requires enhanced
disclosures related to subsequent events including the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.
SFAS No. 165 (ASC 855) is effective for interim
and annual financial statements ending after June 15, 2009
and must be applied prospectively. In accordance with
SFAS No. 165 (ASC 855), we have evaluated subsequent
events through the date of issuance of these condensed
consolidated financial statements, which is November 9,
2009.
On July 1, 2009, we adopted ASC 105, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. ASC 105 establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to
be used by non-governmental entities in the preparation of
financial statements presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
Rules and
52
interpretations of the SEC under the authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants such as us. On July 1, 2009, the Codification
reorganized the pre-Codification GAAP into approximately 90
accounting topics and superseded all then-existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards. All accounting literature
not included in the Codification became non-authoritative. All
of the Codifications content carries the same level of
authority, which effectively superseded SFAS No. 162.
ASC 105 is effective for financial statements for interim or
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
Accordingly, we adopted ASC 105 on July 1, 2009. The
adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows but resulted in changes to the references to accounting
principles in our notes to the consolidated financial statements
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted. In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140 and SFAS No. 167,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an amendment
to FIN 46(R). Together these new standards aim to
improve the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles currently
exempt from consolidation and address practice issues involving
the accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or
secured borrowings. These new standards are effective as of the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year beginning after
November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that
first year, with earlier adoption prohibited. Accordingly, we
will adopt SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 on January 1, 2010.
We have not yet determined the impact, if any, the adoption of
SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 will have on our consolidated
financial statements. The FASB has net yet codified these
standards.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Except as provided in the New Accounting
Pronouncements section above and the enhanced
disclosures regarding goodwill below, as of the date of this
filing, there have been no material changes in our critical
accounting policies disclosed in Item 7 to Part I of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008 Annual Report).
Due to the current recessionary environment, we have enhanced
our disclosures related to valuation of goodwill from what was
included in our 2008 Annual Report under Critical Accounting
Policies Valuation of Intangibles and Long-Lived
Assets.
Valuation of goodwill. We have recorded
goodwill in connection with various of our acquisitions.
Goodwill is subject to an annual assessment for impairment using
a two-step fair value-based test, which we perform at the
operating unit level. We have determined that, based on our cash
flow structure and organizational structure, our individual
operating units represent our reporting units for the purpose of
assessing goodwill impairments. This assessment is performed
annually at year-end, or more frequently if events or
circumstances exist which indicate that goodwill may be
impaired. For instance, a decrease in our market capitalization
below book value, a significant change in business climate or a
loss of a significant customer, among other things, may trigger
the need for interim impairment testing of goodwill associated
with one or all of our reporting units. The first step of the
two-step fair value-based test involves comparing the fair value
of each of our reporting units with its carrying value,
including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit
exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed. The second
step compares the carrying amount of the reporting units
goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the
implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount,
an impairment loss would be recorded as a reduction to goodwill
with a corresponding charge to operating expense.
We determine the fair value of our reporting units using a
weighted combination of the discounted cash flow, market
multiple and market capitalization valuation approaches, with
heavier weighting on the discounted cash flow method, as in
managements opinion, this method currently results in the
most accurate calculation of a reporting units fair value.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment
and the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such
estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates,
operating margins, discount rates, weighted average costs of
capital and future market conditions, among others. We believe
that the estimates and assumptions used in our impairment
assessments are reasonable and based on available market
information, but variations in any of the assumptions could
result in materially different calculations of fair value and
determinations of whether or not an impairment is indicated.
53
Under the discounted cash flow method, we determine fair value
based on the estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit,
discounted to present value using risk-adjusted industry
discount rates, which reflect the overall level of inherent risk
of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside investor
would expect to earn. Year one cash flows are derived from
budgeted amounts and operating forecasts, both of which are
evaluated by management. Subsequent period cash flows are
developed for each reporting unit using growth rates that
management believes are reasonably likely to occur along with a
terminal value derived from the reporting units earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
The EBITDA multiples for each reporting unit are based on
trailing twelve-month comparable industry data.
Under the market multiple and market capitalization approaches,
we determine the estimated fair value of each of our reporting
units by applying transaction multiples to each reporting
units projected EBITDA and then averaging that estimate
with similar historical calculations using either a one or two
year average. For the market capitalization approach, we add a
reasonable control premium, which is estimated as the premium
that would be received in a sale of the reporting unit in an
orderly transaction between market participants.
The projected cash flows and estimated levels of EBITDA by
reporting unit were used to determine fair value under the three
approaches discussed herein. The following table presents the
significant estimates used by management in determining the fair
values of our reporting units at December 31, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Units Providing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Predominantly Electric Power
|
|
Operating Units Providing
|
|
Unit
|
|
|
and Natural Gas
|
|
Predominantly
|
|
Providing
|
|
|
and Pipeline Services
|
|
Telecommunications Services
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Years of cash flows before terminal value
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
N/A
|
|
15
|
Discount rates
|
|
14%
|
|
14% to 15%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
N/A
|
|
15%
|
EBITDA multiples
|
|
7.0 to 9.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
5.0 to 6.0
|
|
N/A
|
|
10.0
|
Weighting of three approaches:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flows
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
N/A
|
|
90%
|
Market multiple
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
Market capitalization
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
Quantas operations remain structured on an operating unit
basis, with each operating unit being organized into one of
three internal divisions, which are closely aligned with its
operating segments and are based on the predominant type of work
performed by the operating unit at the point in time when the
divisional designation is made.
The changes in our reportable segments
during the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 did not have any impact on our operating
unit structure. Because separate measures of assets and cash
flows are not produced or utilized by management to evaluate
segment performance, Quantas impairment assessments of its
goodwill do not include any considerations of cash flows by its
reportable segments.
During 2007 and 2008, a goodwill analysis was performed for each
operating unit with estimates and industry comparables obtained
from the electric power and natural gas, telecommunications and
fiber optic licensing industries. At December 31, 2007, we
did not perform a separate goodwill impairment analysis for the
operating unit that provides fiber optic licensing as we had
recently acquired this operating unit on August 30, 2007 in
connection with our acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc.,
and goodwill associated with that transaction was assessed in
the aggregate. The
15-year
discounted cash flow model used for fiber optic licensing in
2008 was based on the long-term nature of the underlying fiber
network licensing agreements.
We assigned a higher weighting to the discounted cash flow
approach at both December 31, 2007 and 2008 to reflect
increased expectations of market value being determined from a
held and used model. At December 31, 2008, we
increased the weighting for the discounted cash flow approach as
compared to December 31, 2007 due to the volatility of the
capital markets at the end of 2008 and the impact such
volatility may have had on the accuracy of the market multiple
and market capitalization approaches. Also at December 31,
2008, we increased discount rates and decreased EBITDA multiples
at reporting units to reflect potential declines in market
conditions.
54
As stated previously, year one cash flows are derived from
budgeted amounts and operating forecasts, both of which were
evaluated by management. For 2009, projected growth rates by
reporting unit varied widely. Projected annual growth rates
ranged from 2% to 10% thereafter for operating units in the
electric power and the natural gas and pipeline divisions, 2% to
10% thereafter for operating units in telecommunications and 10%
to 50% thereafter for the operating unit in fiber optic
licensing.
Based on the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis, we
determined that, as of December 31, 2008, the fair value of
each reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value. We
considered the sensitivity of these fair value estimates to
changes in certain of managements assumptions, noting
that, after giving consideration to at least a 10% decrease in
the fair value of each of our reporting units, the results of
our assessment would not have changed. Additionally, we compared
the sum of fair values of our reporting units to our market
capitalization at December 31, 2008 and determined that the
excess of the aggregate fair value of all reporting units to our
market capitalization reflected a reasonable control premium.
Further, our market capitalization at December 31, 2008 was
approximately $3.9 billion, and our carrying value,
including goodwill, was approximately $2.7 billion.
Accordingly, we determined that there was no goodwill impairment
at December 31, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, there
were no known impairment indicators at any of the reporting
units. Additionally, at September 30, 2009, our market
capitalization was approximately $4.5 billion and our
aggregate carrying value, including goodwill, was approximately
$2.8 billion. Increases in the carrying value of individual
reporting units that may be indicated by our impairment tests
are not recorded, therefore we may record goodwill impairments
in the future, even when the aggregate fair value of our
reporting units as a whole may increase.
We recognize that we and our customers are operating in a
challenging business environment in light of the economic
downturn and weak capital markets. We are closely monitoring our
customers and the effect that changes in economic and market
conditions may have on them and therefore our reporting units.
Certain of our customers, in particular our electric power,
telecommunications and oil and gas customers, have reduced
spending in the first nine months of 2009, which we attribute to
the negative economic and market conditions, and we anticipate
that these negative conditions may continue to affect demand for
some of our services in the near-term. We continue to monitor
the impact of the economic environment on our reporting units
and the valuation of recorded goodwill. Although we are not
aware of circumstances that would lead to a goodwill impairment
at a reporting unit currently, circumstances such as a continued
market decline, the loss of a major customer or other factors
could impact the valuation of goodwill in the future.
Outlook
We and our customers are operating in a challenging business
environment in light of the economic downturn and weak capital
markets. As a result, many of our customers have reduced
spending in 2009, negatively impacting our revenues throughout
this year. While we believe that economic conditions may begin
to improve in the next six months and create increased demand
for our services in the second half of 2010, we anticipate that
the first quarter of 2010 will be challenging. We continue to be
optimistic about our
long-term
opportunities in each of the industries we serve, and we believe
that our financial and operational strengths will enable us to
manage the challenges and uncertainties of the negative economic
and market conditions.
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment
The North American electric grid is aging and requires
significant upgrades to meet future demands for power. Over the
past two years, many utilities across the country increased or
indicated plans to increase spending on their transmission and
distribution systems, with a more significant focus on the
upgrade and build-out of the transmission grid. As a result, new
construction, structure change-outs, line upgrades and
maintenance projects on many transmission systems are occurring.
We have seen a slow-down in spending by our customers on their
distribution systems, which we believe is due primarily to
negative economic and market conditions, and we expect
distribution spending to remain slow during 2010. We believe,
however, that utilities remain committed to the expansion and
strengthening of their transmission infrastructure, and we do
not expect significant delays in large transmission projects. We
also anticipate that utilities will continue to integrate
smart grid technologies into their systems to
improve grid management and create efficiencies. However, if
economic and market conditions remain stagnant or worsen,
spending on projects could be negatively affected as well.
Additionally, as an indirect result of
55
the economic downturn, overall demand for electricity is
expected to decrease, which could affect the timing and scope of
transmission and distribution spending by our customers on their
existing systems or planned projects.
We also anticipate increased infrastructure spending as a result
of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which requires the power
industry to meet federal reliability standards for its
transmission and distribution systems and provides further
incentives to the industry to invest in and improve maintenance
on its systems. The American Clean Energy and Security (ACES)
Act, which was approved by the House of Representatives in June
2009 and is being reviewed by the Senate, could also positively
impact infrastructure spending in the long-term. If enacted as
proposed, the ACES Act could alleviate some of the siting and
right-of-way
challenges that impact transmission projects, potentially
accelerating future transmission projects. A recent alliance
among nine federal agencies, including the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Department of Energy and the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, is also intended to simplify and
streamline the siting and approval process for building new
transmission lines on federal lands. Additionally, we expect the
construction of renewable energy facilities, including wind and
solar power generation sources, to result in the need for
additional transmission lines and substations. As a result of
these and other factors, we expect a continued shift over the
long-term in our electric power service mix to a greater
proportion of high-voltage electric power transmission and
substation projects, as well as opportunities to provide
installation services for renewable projects. Many of these
projects have a long-term horizon, and timing and scope can be
negatively affected by numerous factors, including regulatory
permitting, availability of funding and the effect of negative
economic and market conditions.
We believe that opportunities also exist for us to provide
engineering, project management and installation services for
renewable projects, including wind and solar. State mandates,
which set standards for how much power is required to be
generated from renewable energy sources, as well as general
environmental concerns, are driving the development of renewable
energy projects, with a stronger focus currently on
utility-scale and distributed solar projects. Tax incentives and
government stimulus funds are also expected to encourage
development. Additionally, the pending ACES Act includes a
proposed federal renewable portfolio standard that we expect
could further advance the installation of renewable generation
facilities. While renewable energy spending declined in the
latter part of 2008 and first nine months of 2009, due in part
to slow government funding and tight credit markets, we expect
future spending on renewable energy initiatives to increase
beginning in late 2009, although investments could be impacted
by further government funding delays, as well as capital
constraints if the financial markets continue to deteriorate or
remain stagnant. It is also not certain when or if the ACES Act
will be enacted or whether the potentially beneficial provisions
we highlight in this outlook will be included in the final
legislation.
We believe that certain provisions of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), enacted in February 2009, will
also increase demand for our services over the long-term. The
economic stimulus programs under the ARRA include incentives in
the form of grants, loans, tax cuts and tax credits for
renewable energy, energy efficiency and electric power and
telecommunications infrastructure. For example, the ARRA
extended tax credits for wind projects until 2012, which we
expect will encourage further development in wind energy.
Additionally, loan guarantee programs partially funded through
the ARRA and cash grant programs have recently been implemented
for renewable energy and transmission reliability and efficiency
projects. For example, in October 2009, approximately
$3.4 billion in cash grants were awarded to foster the
transition to a smarter electric grid. Funds
provided to the states for the restoration, repair and
construction of highways will also likely require the relocation
and upgrade of electric power, telecommunications and natural
gas infrastructure. We anticipate investments in many of these
initiatives to create opportunities for our operations, although
many projects are awaiting government funding. We also cannot
predict with certainty the timing of the implementation of the
programs that support these investments or the timing or scope
of the investments once the programs are implemented.
Several industry and market trends are also prompting customers
in the electric power industry to seek outsourcing partners.
These trends include an aging utility workforce, increasing
costs and labor issues. The need to ensure available labor
resources for larger projects is also driving strategic
relationships with customers.
56
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
We also see potential growth opportunities over the long-term in
our natural gas operations, primarily in natural gas pipeline
installation and maintenance services and related services such
as gas gathering and pipeline integrity. We believe our recent
acquisition of Price Gregory, which significantly expands our
natural gas services and positions us as a leading provider of
transmission pipeline infrastructure services in North America,
will allow us to take advantage of these opportunities. However,
the natural gas industry is cyclical as a result of fluctuations
in natural gas prices, and over the past twelve months, spending
in this industry has been negatively impacted by lower natural
gas prices, a reduction in the development of natural gas
resources and capital constraints. We believe that the cyclical
nature of this business can be somewhat normalized by
opportunities associated with an increase in the on-going
development of tight gas shale formations, which will require
the construction of transmission infrastructure to connect
production with demand centers. Additionally, we believe the
goals of clean energy and energy independence for the United
States will make abundant, low-cost natural gas the fuel of
choice to replace coal for power generation until renewable
energy becomes a significant part of the overall generation of
electricity, creating the demand for additional production of
natural gas and the need for related infrastructure. In the
past, our natural gas operations have been challenged by lower
margins overall, due in part to our natural gas distribution
services that have been impacted by certain lower margin
contracts and by declines in new housing construction.
Accordingly, as evidenced by our acquisition of Price Gregory,
we have primarily focused our efforts on natural gas
transmission opportunities and other more profitable services,
and we are optimistic about these operations in the future.
However, we expect economic and market conditions as well as the
level of natural gas prices to continue to negatively affect
this business in the near-term.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment
In connection with our telecommunications services, we believe
opportunities exist as a result of various initiatives on-going
by several wireline carriers and government organizations, in
particular, with respect to deployment of fiber to the premises
(FTTP) and fiber to the node (FTTN). Such initiatives have been
underway by Verizon, AT&T and other telecommunications
providers, and municipalities and other government jurisdictions
are also active in these opportunities. Since the second quarter
of 2008, we have experienced a decline in revenues from our
telecommunications services, primarily as a result of the
significant slow-down in FTTP and FTTN deployment. However, we
believe these revenues may be stabilizing, as we saw an increase
in work for Verizon and certain other customers during the third
quarter of 2009. We have not seen a similar increase in services
for AT&T, although AT&T has not indicated any change
in its deployment strategies, and we anticipate that services
for AT&T will increase in 2010. We also expect future
opportunities from certain rural broadband deployment projects,
as stimulus funding for these projects will likely be awarded
starting in late 2009 and continuing throughout 2010 to
municipalities, states and rural telephone companies, some of
which are long-standing customers. As a result of these factors,
we expect spending on FTTP and FTTN and other broadband
deployment to improve in 2010, although if economic and market
conditions remain stagnant or further deteriorate, this spending
could be further delayed. In connection with our wireless
services, several wireless companies have announced plans to
increase their cell site deployments over the next few years,
including the expansion of next generation technology. In
particular, the transition to 4G technology by wireless service
providers will require the enhancement of their networks. We
anticipate increased opportunities from these plans over the
long-term, with the timing and amount of spending on these plans
somewhat dependent on future economic and market conditions.
We anticipate that the future initiatives by the
telecommunication carriers will serve as a catalyst for the
cable industry to begin a new network upgrade cycle to expand
its service offerings in an effort to retain and attract
customers; however, the timing of any upgrades is uncertain.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment
Our Fiber Optic Licensing segment is experiencing growth
primarily through geographic expansion, with a focus on markets
such as education and healthcare where secure high-speed
networks are important. We continue to see opportunities for
growth both in the markets we currently serve and new markets,
although we cannot predict the negative impact, if any, of the
current economic downturn on these growth opportunities. To
support the growth in this business, we anticipate the need for
continued significant capital expenditures. Our Fiber Optic
Licensing
57
segment typically generates higher margins than our other
operations, but we can give no assurance that the Fiber Optic
Licensing segment margins will continue at historical levels.
Conclusion
Spending by our customers has declined in 2009, resulting in an
overall reduction in our 2009 revenues. While our customers have
historically continued to spend throughout short-term economic
softness or weak recessions, the longer-term recession we are
experiencing has had a negative impact on our customers
spending. In addition, the volatility of the capital markets has
negatively affected some of our customers plans for
projects, and it may continue to do so in the future, which
could delay, reduce or suspend future projects if funding is not
available. It is uncertain when and to what extent the current
unfavorable economic and market conditions will improve, or if
they will deteriorate further. Despite reductions in capital
spending by some of our customers, our revenues in certain of
the industries we serve may not continue to decline
significantly, as utilities continue spending on projects to
upgrade and build out their transmission systems and continue
outsourcing more of their work, in part due to their aging
workforce issues. We believe that we remain the partner of
choice for many utilities in need of broad infrastructure
expertise, specialty equipment and workforce resources. We also
believe that, through the acquisition of Price Gregory, we are
one of the largest full-service solution providers of natural
gas transmission and distribution services in North America,
which positions us to leverage opportunities in the natural gas
industry. Furthermore, as new technologies emerge in the future
for communications and digital services such as voice, video and
data, telecommunications and cable service providers are
expected to work quickly to deploy fast, next-generation fiber
and wireless networks, and we are recognized as a key partner in
deploying these services.
With the growth in several of our markets and our margin
enhancement initiatives, we expect to continue to see our gross
margins generally improve over the long-term, although
reductions in spending by our customers could further negatively
affect our margins, with the most significant impact to our
telecommunications, gas and electric power distribution
services. Additionally, gross margins may be negatively impacted
on a quarterly basis due to adverse weather conditions and other
factors as described in Understanding Margins
above. We continue to focus on the elements of the business
we can control, including costs, the margins we accept on
projects, collecting receivables, ensuring quality service and
rightsizing initiatives to match the markets we serve. These
initiatives include aligning our workforce with our current
revenue base, evaluating opportunities to reduce the number of
field offices and evaluating our non-core assets for potential
sale. Such initiatives could result in future charges related
to, among other things, severance, retention, the shutdown and
consolidation of facilities, property disposal and other exit
costs.
Capital expenditures for 2009 are expected to be approximately
$170 million, of which $85 million of these
expenditures are targeted for dark fiber network expansion with
the majority of the remaining expenditures for operating
equipment. We expect 2009 capital expenditures to continue to be
funded substantially through internal cash flows and cash on
hand.
We continue to evaluate potential strategic acquisitions or
investments to broaden our customer base, expand our geographic
area of operation and grow our portfolio of services. We believe
that additional attractive acquisition candidates exist
primarily as a result of the highly fragmented nature of the
industry, the inability of many companies to expand and
modernize due to capital constraints and the desire of owners
for liquidity. We also believe that our financial strength and
experienced management team will be attractive to acquisition
candidates.
We believe that we are adequately positioned to capitalize upon
opportunities and trends in the industries we serve because of
our proven full-service operating units with broad geographic
reach, financial capability and technical expertise.
Additionally, we believe that industry opportunities and trends
will increase the demand for our services over the long-term;
however, we cannot predict the actual timing, magnitude or
impact these opportunities and trends will have on our operating
results and financial position, especially in light of the
economic downturn and weak capital markets.
Uncertainty
of Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
includes forward-looking statements reflecting
assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs
about future events that are intended to qualify for the
safe harbor from
58
liability established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these statements by the
fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts. They use words such as anticipate,
estimate, project, forecast,
may, will, should,
could, expect, believe,
plan, intend and other words of similar
meaning. In particular, these include, but are not limited to,
statements relating to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Projected operating or financial results;
|
|
|
|
The effects of any acquisitions and divestitures we may make,
including the acquisition of Price Gregory on October 1,
2009;
|
|
|
|
Expectations regarding our business outlook, growth and capital
expenditures;
|
|
|
|
The effects of competition in our markets;
|
|
|
|
The benefits of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, renewable energy
initiatives, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA) and other potential energy legislation;
|
|
|
|
The current economic conditions and trends in the industries we
serve; and
|
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve cost savings.
|
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve or rely on a number of risks,
uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict or
beyond our control. We have based our forward-looking statements
on our managements beliefs and assumptions based on
information available to our management at the time the
statements are made. We caution you that actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted by our forward-looking statements and that any or all
of our forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong.
Those statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions and
by known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
Adverse changes in economic and financial conditions, including
the recent volatility in the capital markets, and trends in
relevant markets;
|
|
|
|
Delays, reductions in scope or cancellations of existing
projects, including as a result of capital constraints that may
impact our customers;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to generate internal growth;
|
|
|
|
The effect of natural gas and oil prices on our operations and
growth opportunities;
|
|
|
|
Our dependence on fixed price contracts and the potential to
incur losses with respect to those contracts;
|
|
|
|
Estimates relating to our use of
percentage-of-completion
accounting;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to effectively compete for new projects;
|
|
|
|
Potential failure of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, renewable
energy initiatives, the ARRA or other potential energy
legislation to result in increased spending in the industries we
serve;
|
|
|
|
Cancellation provisions within our contracts and the risk that
contracts expire and are not renewed or are replaced on less
favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
The failure to effectively integrate Price Gregory and its
operations or to realize potential synergies, such as
cross-selling opportunities, from the Merger;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to attract skilled labor and retain key personnel
and qualified employees;
|
|
|
|
The potential shortage of skilled employees;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to realize our backlog;
|
|
|
|
Estimates and assumptions in determining our financial results
and backlog;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate
acquisitions, including the Merger with Price Gregory;
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
The potential adverse impact resulting from uncertainty
surrounding acquisitions, including the ability to retain key
personnel from the acquired businesses and the potential
increase in risks already existing in our operations;
|
|
|
|
The adverse impact of goodwill, other intangible asset or
long-lived asset impairments;
|
|
|
|
The potential inability to realize a return on our capital
investments in our fiber optic infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
The inability of our customers to pay for services following a
bankruptcy or other financial difficulty;
|
|
|
|
Beliefs and assumptions about the collectability of receivables;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities for claims that are not insured;
|
|
|
|
The impact of our unionized workforce on our operations and on
our ability to complete future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with union pension plans, including
potential underfunding liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Potential liabilities relating to occupational health and safety
matters;
|
|
|
|
Potential lack of available suppliers, subcontractors or
equipment manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
Our growth outpacing our infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
Unexpected costs or liabilities that may arise from lawsuits or
indemnity claims related to the services we perform;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and/or harm
to our reputation resulting from failures of our joint venture
partners to perform;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to obtain performance bonds;
|
|
|
|
Risks related to the implementation of an information technology
solution;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to continue to meet the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
Potential exposure to environmental liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Potential losses associated with hedging transactions;
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with expanding our business in international
markets, including losses that may arise from currency
fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
Requirements relating to governmental regulation and changes
thereto, including state and federal telecommunication
regulations affecting our dark fiber licensing business,
additional regulation relating to existing or potential foreign
operations and changes in legislation under the new presidential
administration;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve anticipated synergies and other benefits
from our acquisitions, including the Merger with Price Gregory;
|
|
|
|
Rapid technological and structural changes that could reduce the
demand for the services we provide;
|
|
|
|
The cost of borrowing, availability of credit, debt covenant
compliance, interest rate fluctuations and other factors
affecting our financing, leasing and investment activities and
thereby our ability to grow our operations;
|
|
|
|
The potential conversion of our outstanding 3.75% Notes
into cash
and/or
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
The other risks and uncertainties as are described elsewhere
herein and under Item 1A Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as disclosed in
Item 1A to Part II of our Quarterly Report on
Forms 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009 and as may be detailed from time to time in our other
public filings with the SEC.
|
All of our forward-looking statements, whether written or oral,
are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any
other cautionary statements that may accompany such
forward-looking statements or that are otherwise included in
this report. In addition, we do not undertake and expressly
disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
this report or otherwise.
60
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The information in this section should be read in connection
with the information on financial market risk related to changes
in interest rates and currency exchange rates in Part II,
Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk, in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our primary exposure
to market risk relates to unfavorable changes in concentration
of credit risk, interest rates and currency exchange rates.
Credit Risk. We are subject to concentrations
of credit risk related to our cash and cash equivalents and
accounts receivable. Substantially all of our cash investments
are managed by what we believe to be high credit quality
financial institutions. In accordance with our investment
policies, these institutions are authorized to invest this cash
in a diversified portfolio of what we believe to be high-quality
investments, which primarily include interest-bearing demand
deposits, money market mutual funds and investment grade
commercial paper with original maturities of three months or
less. Although we do not currently believe the principal amounts
of these investments are subject to any material risk of loss,
the recent volatility in the financial markets is likely to
continue to significantly impact the interest income we receive
from these investments. In addition, as we grant credit under
normal payment terms, generally with collateral, we are subject
to potential credit risk related to our customers ability
to pay for services provided. This risk may be heightened as a
result of the current financial crisis and volatility of the
markets. However, we believe the concentration of credit risk
related to trade accounts receivable is limited because of the
diversity of our customers. We perform ongoing credit risk
assessments of our customers and financial institutions and
obtain collateral or other security from our customers when
appropriate.
Interest Rate and Market Risk. Our exposure to
market and interest rate risk for changes in interest rates
relates to our convertible subordinated notes. The fair market
value of our fixed rate convertible subordinated notes is
subject to interest rate risk because of their fixed interest
rate and market risk due to the convertible feature of our
convertible subordinated notes. Generally, the fair market value
of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall
and decrease as interest rates rise. The fair market value of
our convertible subordinated notes will also increase as the
market price of our stock rises and decrease as the market price
falls. The interest and market value changes affect the fair
market value of our convertible subordinated notes but do not
impact their carrying value. As of December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009, the fair value of the aggregate
principal amount of our fixed-rate debt of $143.8 million
was approximately $136.6 million and $162.8 million,
based upon quoted secondary market prices on or before such
dates. In addition, the volatility of the credit markets has had
a negative impact on interest income in the last several
quarters, and it is likely to significantly impact our interest
income related to our cash investments in the near-term.
Currency Risk. In the third quarter of 2009,
one of our Canadian operating units entered into three forward
contracts to reduce foreign currency risk associated with
anticipated customer sales that are denominated in South African
rand. This same operating unit also entered into three
additional forward contracts to reduce the foreign currency
exposure associated with a series of forecasted payments
denominated in U.S. dollars to be made in the next twelve
months. These forward contracts expire between December 2009 and
November 2010.
Three of these forward contracts are for an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $11.0 million (Canadian) and are
accounted for by the Canadian operating unit as cash flow
hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the three
forward contracts between the South African rand and the
Canadian dollar are recorded in other comprehensive income
(loss) and will be reclassified into earnings in the periods in
which the hedged forecasted transactions occur. During the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, a nominal loss was
recorded to other comprehensive income (loss) related to the
three South African rand to Canadian dollar forward contracts.
The other three forward contracts are for an aggregate notional
amount of approximately $9.5 million (U.S.) and are
also accounted for as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, changes in
the fair value of the three forward contracts between the
Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar are recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) and will be reclassified into
earnings in the periods in which the hedged forecasted
transactions occur. During the quarter ended September 30,
2009, a nominal amount was recorded to other comprehensive
income (loss) related to the three Canadian dollar to
U.S. dollar forward contracts.
Effectiveness testing related to these cash flow hedges is
performed at the end of each quarter. Any ineffective portion of
the derivatives is reclassified into earnings if the derivatives
are no longer deemed to be cash flow hedges.
61
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, a
nominal amount was considered ineffective and was recorded
within other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
The business of our Canadian subsidiaries is subject to currency
fluctuations. We do not expect any such currency risk to be
material.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Attached as exhibits to this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
are certifications of Quantas Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer that are required in accordance with
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act). This Controls and Procedures section includes
information concerning the controls and controls evaluation
referred to in the certifications and it should be read in
conjunction with the certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has established and maintains a system of
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act, such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are
also designed to provide reasonable assurance that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Exchange Act. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded
that, as of September 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Design
and Operation of Control Systems
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control
systems objectives will be met. The design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error
or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because
of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can be circumvented by
the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the controls. The design of
any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
62
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits, claims and
other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any
of these proceedings, separately or in the aggregate, would be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Except as provided below and as disclosed herein and in
Item 1A to Part II of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as of the date of
this filing, there have been no material changes from the risk
factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008 Annual Report).
An investment in our common stock involves various risks. When
considering an investment in our company, you should carefully
consider all of the risk factors referenced herein and in our
2008 Annual Report. These risks and uncertainties are not the
only ones facing us and there may be additional matters that are
not known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. All of
these risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our
business, financial condition or future results and, thus, the
value of an investment in our company.
As a
result of the Merger with Price Gregory, our profitability and
financial condition may be negatively affected by risks
associated with the natural gas and oil industry, such as price
fluctuations and supply and demand.
As a result of the Merger, the risks associated with providing
natural gas and pipeline infrastructure services have now
increased due to the increase in the portion of our revenues
attributable to these services. These risks, which are not
subject to our control, include the volatility of natural gas
prices, the lack of demand for power generation from natural gas
and a reduction or stoppage in the discovery or development of
natural gas and oil resources. Specifically, lower natural gas
and oil prices generally result in decreased spending by our
customers. While higher natural gas and oil prices generally
result in increased spending by our customers, sustained high
energy prices could be an impediment to economic growth, and
could therefore negatively impact spending by our customers.
Additionally, a lack of demand for power generation from natural
gas could result in less capital spending by our customers,
including for the expansion of North Americas natural gas
pipeline infrastructure, and consequently result in less demand
for our services. Further, a reduction or stoppage in the
discovery or development of natural gas and oil resources could
also result in less capital spending by our customers and
therefore result in less demand for our services. If the
profitability of our business relating to natural gas and
pipeline infrastructure services were to decline, our
profitability, results of operations and cash flows could also
be adversely affected.
As a
result of the Merger with Price Gregory, we are subject to
increased risks.
As a result of the Merger, we expect to generate a greater
portion of our revenues under fixed price contracts and
contracts with scheduled completion dates or other scheduled
milestones. Due to various risks inherent in performing fixed
price contracts, actual revenue and gross profits for a project
may differ from those originally estimated and could result in
reduced profitability or losses on projects. Failure to meet
schedules or milestones may result in additional costs or
penalties, including liquidated damages. As we expect to enter
into a greater number of fixed price contracts and contracts
with scheduled completion dates or other scheduled milestones,
the risk of experiencing reduced profit or losses on projects
increases and the realization of such risk could have a
significant impact on our operating results and/or cash flows
for any fiscal quarter or year.
63
As a result of the Merger, we also have increased the size of
our unionized workforce as well as the percentage of our
employees who are covered by collective bargaining agreements.
The increase in our unionized workforce due to the Merger could
magnify the adverse effects that a potential strike or work
stoppage would have on us. Strikes or work stoppages could
adversely impact our relationships with our customers and could
cause us to lose business and decrease our revenue.
Quantas and Price Gregorys operations have also
contributed and are currently contributing to several
multiemployer pension plans for employees covered by collective
bargaining agreements. These plans are not administered by us,
and contributions are determined in accordance with provisions
of negotiated labor contracts. The Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multi-Employer Pension
Plan Amendments Act of 1980, may subject us to substantial
liabilities in the event of our withdrawal from, or upon
termination of, such plans. We do not have information on the
net assets and actuarial present value of the multiemployer
pension plans unfunded vested benefits allocable to us, if
any, or the amounts, if any, for which we may be liable if we
were to withdraw from any of these plans.
Quantas and Price Gregorys operations are subject to
various environmental laws and regulations which are complex and
stringent. As a result of the Merger, the environmental risks
relating to our operations have increased. For example, we now
expect an increase in the amount of work performed in and around
environmentally sensitive areas, such as rivers, lakes and
wetlands. Any release of contaminants in excess of amounts
permitted by law into such areas caused by our operations could
expose us to significant remediation costs and fines.
Additionally, we now own and operate a greater number of
properties that contain fuel storage tanks. If any of these
tanks were to leak, we could also be subject to costs of
remediation and potential fines.
As a result of the Merger, we have increased the number of our
joint venture arrangements. Consequently, we are subject to
increased risk relating to these arrangements, including
potential liability for the failure of a joint venture partner
to perform or to be financially able to bear its portion of
required capital contributions or other obligations. If we are
unable to adequately address our partners performance
issues, the customer may terminate the project, which could
result in legal liability to us, harm our reputation and reduce
our profit on a project.
Quantas and Price Gregorys operations are subject to
extensive laws and regulations relating to maintenance of safe
conditions in the workplace. As a result of the Merger,
occupational and health risks relating to our operations could
increase. For example, the increase in numbers of employees and
projects as a result of the Merger may cause us to experience an
increase in the number of serious accidents, including
fatalities, which could subject us to substantial penalties,
civil litigation or criminal prosecution and potentially
materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows. Further, an increase in claims for
bodily injury or loss of life could result in a substantial
deterioration of our safety record, which may cause our
customers to cancel our contracts and not award us future
business.
As a result of the Merger, our results of operations could be
adversely affected by any issues attributable to Price
Gregorys operations that arose prior to the closing of the
Merger, including issues with respect to Price Gregorys
projects that may decrease our profitability or result in
litigation. Furthermore, to the extent that Price Gregory had or
is perceived by customers to have had operational challenges,
such as on-time performance, safety issues or workforce issues,
those challenges may raise concerns by our customers, which may
limit or impede our future ability to obtain additional work
from those customers.
We may
not realize all of the anticipated benefits from acquiring Price
Gregory.
The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on our ability
to realize anticipated benefits from acquiring Price Gregory,
including the significant expansion of our natural gas and
pipeline operations, certain eliminations of redundant costs and
cross-selling opportunities with our other operations. To
realize these benefits, however, we must successfully integrate
the operations and personnel of Price Gregory into our business.
If this integration is unsuccessful, the anticipated benefits of
the Merger may not be realized fully or at all, may take longer
or cost more to realize than expected. Because we and Price
Gregory have previously operated as independent companies, it is
possible the integration may result in the future loss of
valuable employees, the disruption of our business or
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices,
policies and compensation arrangements. Furthermore, Price
Gregory was formed on January 31, 2008 through a
combination of H.C. Price Company and Gregory &
64
Cook Construction, Inc., both independently operated companies
with separate ownership prior to the combination. Although
substantial progress had been made at the time of the Merger,
the integration of these two companies is continuing, and this
integration may result in similar adverse impacts to our
business. If we are unable to successfully complete these
integrations, we may not fully realize the anticipated benefits
from the Merger or may be impacted negatively by the integration
process, which could adversely affect our revenues, earnings and
cash flows.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Securities
In July 2009, Quanta completed the acquisition of a specialty
contractor for the electric, gas and telecommunications
industries in which some of the purchase price consideration
consisted of the issuance of unregistered securities of Quanta.
The aggregate consideration of approximately $16.6 million
paid in this transaction consisted of approximately
$10.1 million in cash and 321,548 shares of common
stock. This acquisition was not affiliated with any prior
acquisition.
Also in July 2009, Quanta completed the acquisition of a
specialty contractor for the electric power industry in which
some of the purchase price consideration consisted of the
issuance of unregistered securities of Quanta. The aggregate
consideration of approximately $5.7 million paid in this
transaction consisted of approximately $4.7 million in cash
and 50,635 shares of common stock. This acquisition was not
affiliated with any prior acquisition.
All securities listed in the following table were shares of
common stock. Quanta relied on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), as the
basis for exemption from registration. For all issuances, the
purchasers were accredited investors as defined in
Rule 501 of the Securities Act. All issuances were to
owners of businesses acquired in privately negotiated
transactions and not pursuant to public solicitations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares
|
|
Purchaser
|
|
Consideration
|
|
July 1, 2009 July 31, 2009
|
|
|
321,548
|
|
|
Stockholders of acquired company
|
|
Sale of acquired company
|
July 1, 2009 July 31, 2009
|
|
|
50,635
|
|
|
Stockholders of acquired company
|
|
Sale of acquired company
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table contains information about our purchases of
equity securities during the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
that may yet be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
(a) Total Number of
|
|
|
(b) Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Paid Per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
July 1, 2009 July 31, 2009
|
|
|
70
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
23.63
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
August 1, 2009 August 30, 2009
|
|
|
6,020
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
22.93
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
September 1, 2009 September 30, 2009
|
|
|
23
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
23.98
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents shares purchased from employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of
restricted stock awards pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan (as amended and restated March 13, 2003) and the
2007 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 2, 2009, by
and among Quanta Services, Inc., Quanta Sub, LLC, Price Gregory
Services, Incorporated, and certain stockholders of Price
Gregory Services, Incorporated named therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Quanta Services Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2009).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
(No. 001-13831)
filed August 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys 2000
Form 10-K
(No. 001-13831)
filed April 2, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.DEF*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
|
|
|
Included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, (ii) the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, and (iii) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Users of the XBRL
data furnished herewith are advised pursuant to Rule 406T
of
Regulation S-T
that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
66
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant, Quanta Services, Inc., has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Quanta Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Derrick
A. Jensen
|
Derrick A. Jensen
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: November 9, 2009
67
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 2, 2009, by
and among Quanta Services, Inc., Quanta Sub, LLC, Price Gregory
Services, Incorporated, and certain stockholders of Price
Gregory Services, Incorporated named therein (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Quanta Services Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2009).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
(No. 001-13831)
filed August 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys 2000
Form 10-K
(No. 001-13831)
filed April 2, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.DEF*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
|
|
|
Included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, (ii) the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, and (iii) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Users of the XBRL
data furnished herewith are advised pursuant to Rule 406T
of
Regulation S-T
that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
68