AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM S-4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 20, 2005
Registration No. 333-123283
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its certificate of
incorporation)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
4813 |
|
43-1301883 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(IRS Employer
Identification Number) |
175 East Houston
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(210) 821-4105
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal executive
offices)
Joy Rick
175 East Houston
San Antonio, Texas 78205
(210) 821-4105
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies To:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin F. Stapleton, Esq.
John J. OBrien, Esq.
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Tel: (212) 558-4000
Fax: (212) 558-3588 |
|
Wayne A. Wirtz, Esq.
SBC Communications Inc.
175 East Houston
San Antonio, Texas 78205
Tel: (210) 821-4105
Fax: (210) 351-3467 |
|
Robert S. Feit, Esq.
AT&T Corp.
One AT&T Way
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921
Tel: (908) 221-2000
Fax: (908) 532-1989 |
|
Steven A. Rosenblum, Esq.
Stephanie J. Seligman, Esq.
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019
Tel: (212) 403-1000
Fax: (212) 403-2000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective and upon completion of
the transactions described in the enclosed prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this document is not
complete and can be changed. SBC may not issue the securities
being offered by use of this document until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, of
which this document is part, is declared effective. This
document is not an offer to sell these securities and is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction
where such offer, solicitation or sale is prohibited.
|
PRELIMINARY DRAFT DATED APRIL 20, 2005
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
|
|
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS OF |
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT OF |
|
|
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. |
AT&T CORP. |
April [l], 2005
Dear AT&T Shareholder:
It is a pleasure to invite you to AT&Ts 2005 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, on [l],
2005, beginning at 9:30 a.m. local time, at
[l].
At the meeting, among other things, you will be asked to adopt
the merger agreement that AT&T has entered into with SBC
Communications Inc. In the merger, AT&T will merge with a
wholly owned subsidiary of SBC and will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of SBC. AT&T and SBC believe that the merger will
create one of the nations leading communications
companies, with significant national and global reach.
If the merger is completed, AT&T shareholders will receive
0.77942 of a share of SBC common stock for each share of
AT&T common stock held immediately prior to the merger. In
addition, AT&T will declare a special dividend of
$1.30 per share which it intends to pay, assuming the
merger will be completed, on the closing date of the merger.
Based on the closing price of $23.62 per share of SBC
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on January 28,
2005, the last trading day before the public announcement of the
merger, the 0.77942 exchange ratio, taken together with the
$1.30 special dividend, represented a total merger consideration
of approximately $19.71 per AT&T share. Based on the
closing price of $[l] per share of
SBC common stock on the NYSE on
April [l], 2005, the latest
practicable date before the printing of this document, the total
merger consideration was valued at approximately
$[l] per AT&T share. However,
the value of the merger consideration that you will receive for
each share of AT&T common stock will depend on the price per
share of SBC common stock at the time of the merger. That price
is impossible to know at this time, will not be known at the
time of the meeting and may be less than the current price or
the price at the time of the meeting. Based on the estimated
number of shares of AT&T common stock outstanding on the
record date for the meeting, SBC expects to issue approximately
[l] shares of SBC common
stock to AT&T shareholders in connection with the merger.
Immediately after the merger, former AT&T shareholders are
currently expected to own approximately 16% of the
then-outstanding shares of SBC common stock (without giving
effect to shares of SBC common stock held by AT&T
shareholders prior to the merger).
After careful consideration, the AT&T board of directors
has adopted the merger agreement, declared that the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
including the special dividend, are advisable and recommends
that you vote FOR the adoption of the merger agreement.
The accompanying document provides a detailed description of the
proposed merger and the merger consideration. In addition, it
provides you with important information regarding the AT&T
board of directors and its senior management and other proposals
that require your vote, as well as information regarding
AT&Ts corporate governance practices. I urge you to
read the enclosed materials carefully. Please pay particular
attention to the Risk Factors beginning on
page 16 for a discussion of the risks related to the merger
and owning SBC common stock after the merger.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you expect to
attend the meeting, please vote as soon as possible to ensure
that your shares are represented at the meeting. Registered and
many broker-managed shareholders can vote their shares by using
a toll-free telephone number or the Internet. Instructions for
using these convenient services are provided on the proxy card.
Of course, you may still vote your shares by marking your votes
on the proxy card, signing and dating it and mailing it in the
envelope provided. If you sign and return your proxy card
without specifying your choices, it will be understood that you
wish to have your shares voted in accordance with the
directors recommendations.
I look forward to seeing you on
[ l ] in
[ l ].
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
David W. Dorman |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
AT&T Corp. |
AT&T common stock is quoted on the NYSE under the symbol
T. SBC common stock is quoted on the NYSE under the
symbol SBC.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) nor any state securities commission has
approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in
connection with the merger or passed upon the adequacy or
accuracy of this document. Any representation to the contrary is
a criminal offense.
This document is dated [l],
2005 and is expected to be first mailed to AT&Ts
shareholders on or about [l],
2005.
REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This document incorporates important business and financial
information about AT&T and SBC from documents that are not
included in or delivered with this document. This information is
available to you without charge upon your written or oral
request. You can obtain documents related to AT&T and SBC
that are incorporated by reference in this document, without
charge, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the
appropriate company.
|
|
|
AT&T Corp. |
|
SBC Communications Inc. |
One AT&T Way |
|
175 East Houston |
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 |
|
San Antonio, TX 78205 |
(908) 532-1680 |
|
(210) 821-4105 |
www.att.com |
|
www.sbc.com |
(All website addresses given in this document are for
information only and are not intended
to be an active link or to incorporate any website information
into this document.)
Please note that copies of the documents provided to you will
not include exhibits, unless the exhibits are specifically
incorporated by reference into the documents or this document.
In order to receive timely delivery of requested documents in
advance of the annual meeting, you should make your request no
later than [l], 2005.
See Where You Can Find More Information beginning
on page 144.
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
This document, which forms part of a registration statement on
Form S-4 filed with the SEC by SBC (File
No. 333-123283), constitutes a prospectus of SBC under
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which
is referred to in this document as the Securities Act, with
respect to the shares of SBC common stock to be issued to the
holders of AT&T common stock in connection with the merger.
This document also constitutes a proxy statement under
Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, which is referred to in this document as the Exchange
Act, and the rules thereunder, and a notice of meeting with
respect to AT&Ts 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
at which, among other things, the holders of AT&T common
stock will consider and vote on the adoption of the merger
agreement.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
The 120th Annual Meeting of Shareholders of AT&T Corp. will
be held at the [l], on
[l],
[l], 2005, at 9:30 a.m. local
time, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to adopt the merger agreement among SBC, AT&T and Merger Sub; |
|
|
|
|
to adjourn the meeting, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation of proxies, in the event that there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the meeting to adopt the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
|
to elect nine directors; |
|
|
|
|
to ratify the appointment by the Audit Committee of independent
auditors to examine AT&Ts accounts; and |
|
|
|
|
|
to conduct any other business, including shareholder proposals,
as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the meeting. |
|
AT&T shareholders at the close of business on
[l], 2005, are entitled to vote
their proxies. Only AT&T shareholders with an admission
ticket or proof of stock ownership will be admitted to the
meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert S. Feit |
|
Vice President Law and Secretary |
|
AT&T Corp. |
[l], 2005
YOU CAN VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:
(1) Use the toll-free telephone number on your proxy card
to vote by phone;
(2) Visit the website noted on your proxy card to vote via
the Internet;
(3) Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed
envelope to vote by mail; or
(4) Vote in person at the meeting.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
ii
iii
The following are some of the questions that you, as a
shareholder of AT&T, may have and answers to those
questions. These questions and answers, as well as the following
summary, are not meant to be a substitute for the information
contained in the remainder of this document, and this
information is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed
descriptions and explanations contained elsewhere in this
document. We urge you to read this document in its entirety
prior to making any decision as to your AT&T common stock.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE AT&T ANNUAL MEETING AND
THE MERGER
Q1: Why are these
proxy materials being sent to AT&T shareholders?
|
|
A1: |
This document is being provided by, and the enclosed proxy is
solicited by and on behalf of, the AT&T board of directors
for use at the annual meeting of AT&T shareholders. |
|
|
Q2: |
When and where is the AT&T annual meeting? |
|
|
A2: |
The AT&T annual meeting is scheduled to be held at
[l], local time, on
[l], 2005 at
[l], unless it is postponed or
adjourned. |
|
|
Q3: |
What is the purpose of the AT&T annual meeting? What am I
voting on? |
|
|
A3: |
The purpose of the annual meeting is to consider and vote upon: |
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
January 30, 2005 (referred to in this document as the
merger agreement), among SBC, AT&T and Tau Merger Sub
Corporation, a newly formed, direct and wholly owned subsidiary
of SBC (referred to in this document as Merger Sub)
(Proposal 1 on the enclosed proxy card); |
|
|
|
|
adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation of proxies in favor of adoption of the merger
agreement (Proposal l.a on the enclosed proxy card); |
|
|
|
|
election of nine directors (Proposal 2 on the enclosed
proxy card); |
|
|
|
|
ratification of the appointment by the Audit Committee of
independent auditors (Proposal 3 on the enclosed proxy
card); and |
|
|
|
|
|
action upon such other matters, including shareholder proposals,
as may properly come before the meeting (Proposals 4
through 9 on the enclosed proxy card). |
|
|
|
Q4: |
Who is entitled to vote at the AT&T annual meeting? |
|
|
A4: |
AT&T shareholders of record at the close of business on
[l], 2005, the record date for the
AT&T annual meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and
to vote on matters that come before the annual meeting and any
adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting. However, an
AT&T shareholder may only vote his or her shares if he or
she is present in person or is represented by proxy at the
AT&T annual meeting. |
Q5: How
do I vote?
|
|
A5: |
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this document, please submit your proxy by
telephone or Internet in accordance with the instructions set
forth in the enclosed proxy card, or fill out, sign and date the
proxy card, and then mail your signed proxy card in the enclosed
envelope as soon as possible so that your shares may be voted at
the annual meeting. For detailed information please see
Information about the AT&T Meeting How do
I vote? on page 83. |
Q6: How
many votes do I have?
|
|
A6: |
Each share of AT&T common stock that you own as of the
record date entitles you to one vote. On the record date, there
were [l] outstanding shares of
AT&T common stock. On the record date, less than |
iv
|
|
|
1% of the outstanding shares of AT&T common stock were held
by directors and executive officers of AT&T and their
respective affiliates. |
Q7: What constitutes
a quorum at the AT&T annual meeting?
|
|
A7: |
The presence of the holders of 40 percent of the shares
entitled to vote at the AT&T annual meeting constitutes a
quorum. Presence may be in person or by proxy. You will be
considered part of the quorum if you return a signed and dated
proxy card, if you vote by telephone or the Internet, or if you
vote in person at the annual meeting. |
|
|
|
Abstentions and shares voted by a bank or broker holding shares
for a beneficial owner are counted as present and entitled to
vote for purposes of determining a quorum. |
|
|
Q8: |
What vote is required to approve each proposal? What is the
effect of not voting? |
|
|
A8: |
To adopt the merger agreement: the affirmative
vote of the holders of at least a majority of outstanding shares
of AT&T common stock entitled to vote is required to adopt
the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Because the affirmative vote required to adopt the merger
agreement is based upon the total number of outstanding shares
of AT&T common stock, the failure to submit a proxy card (or
to submit a proxy by telephone or by Internet or to vote in
person at the annual meeting) or the abstention from voting by a
shareholder will have the same effect as a vote against adoption
of the merger agreement. Brokers holding shares of AT&T
common stock as nominees will not have discretionary authority
to vote those shares in the absence of instructions from the
beneficial owners of those shares, so the failure to provide
voting instructions to your broker will also have the same
effect as a vote against the merger. |
|
|
Election of directors: the nine nominees who
receive the most votes cast by AT&T shareholders present in
person at the meeting or represented by proxy will be elected.
Any AT&T shares not voted (whether by abstention or
otherwise) will have no impact on the vote. |
|
|
Ratification of Independent Auditors: this
proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least a majority of the votes cast. Any AT&T shares not
voted (whether by abstention or otherwise) will have no impact
on the vote. |
|
|
AT&T shareholder proposals: approval of each
of the six AT&T shareholder proposals requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the
votes cast. Any AT&T shares not voted (whether by abstention
or otherwise) will have no impact on the vote. |
|
|
Q9: |
What are the recommendations of the AT&T board of
directors? |
|
|
A9: |
The AT&T board of directors recommends a vote FOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
the election of the nine nominees for director; and |
|
|
|
the ratification of the appointment of the independent auditors. |
|
|
|
The AT&T board of directors recommends a vote AGAINST
each of the six AT&T shareholder proposals. |
|
|
Q10: |
What if I return my proxy but do not mark it to show how I am
voting? |
|
|
A10: |
If your proxy card is signed and returned without specifying
your choices, your shares will be voted according to the
recommendations of the AT&T board of directors. |
v
|
|
Q11: |
Can I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy by
telephone or Internet or mailed my signed proxy card? |
|
|
A11: |
Yes. You can change your vote by revoking your proxy at any time
before it is exercised at the AT&T annual meeting. You can
revoke your proxy in one of four ways: |
|
|
|
|
|
notify AT&Ts Corporate Secretary in writing before the
annual meeting that you are revoking your proxy; |
|
|
|
submit another proxy with a later date; |
|
|
|
vote again by telephone or the Internet; or |
|
|
|
vote in person at the annual meeting. |
Q12: What if other items come up
at the annual meeting and I am not there to vote?
|
|
A12: |
When you return a signed and dated proxy card or provide your
voting instructions by telephone or the Internet, you give the
AT&T proxy committee (the members of which are listed on
your proxy card) the discretionary authority to vote on your
behalf on any other matter that is properly brought before the
annual meeting. |
Q13: If I want to attend the
annual meeting, what do I do?
|
|
A13: |
You must come to [l],
[l], at
[l], local time, on
[l], 2005. For further information
please see Information about the AT&T
Meeting What do I need to do if I wish to attend the
AT&T annual meeting in person? on page 83. |
|
|
Q14: |
Who can help answer my additional questions about the merger
or the AT&T annual meeting? |
|
|
A14: |
If you have questions about the merger or the annual meeting,
you should contact: |
|
|
|
Morrow & Co., Inc.
445 Park Avenue, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10022
(212) 754-8000
E-mail: att.info@morrowco.com
Telephone: 1-800-206-5881 |
vi
SUMMARY
|
|
|
This summary highlights selected information about the merger
in this document and does not contain all of the information
that may be important to you. You should carefully read this
entire document and the other documents to which this document
refers for a more complete understanding of the matters being
considered at the annual meeting. See Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 144. Unless we
have stated otherwise, all references in this document to
AT&T are to AT&T Corp., all references to SBC are to SBC
Communications Inc., all references to Merger Sub are to Tau
Merger Sub Corporation, and all references to the merger
agreement are to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
January 30, 2005, among AT&T, SBC and Merger Sub, a
copy of which is attached as Annex A to this document. |
The Companies (Page 71)
AT&T. AT&T was incorporated in 1885 under the
laws of the State of New York. Its principal executive offices
are at One AT&T Way, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 and
its telephone number at that address is 908-221-2000. AT&T
maintains an internet website at www.att.com.
For more than a century AT&T has been known for quality and
reliability in communications. Backed by the research and
development capabilities of AT&T Labs, AT&T is a global
leader in local, long distance, internet and transaction-based
voice and data services. AT&Ts primary business
segments are AT&T Business Services and AT&T Consumer
Services.
AT&T is one of the nations largest business services
communications providers, offering a variety of global
communications services to over 2 million customers,
including large domestic and multinational businesses, small and
medium-sized businesses and government agencies. AT&T
operates one of the largest telecommunications networks in the
United States and, through its Global Network Services, provides
an array of services and customized solutions in 60 countries
and 850 cities worldwide.
AT&T is also a provider of domestic and international long
distance and transaction based communications services to over
24 million residential stand alone long distance and
bundled consumers in the U.S.
SBC. SBC is a holding company incorporated under the laws
of the State of Delaware in 1983 and has its principal executive
offices at 175 E. Houston, San Antonio, Texas
78205-2233 (telephone number 210-821-4105). SBC maintains an
internet website at www.sbc.com.
SBC ranks among the largest providers of telecommunications
services in the U.S. and the world. Through its subsidiaries and
affiliates, it provides communications services and products in
the U.S. and has investments in more than 14 countries. It
offers its services and products to businesses and consumers, as
well as other providers of telecommunications services,
including local exchange services, wireless communications,
long-distance services, internet services, telecommunications
equipment, and directory advertising and publishing.
As a Result of the Merger, AT&T will Become a Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of SBC (Page 54)
The merger agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub, a
wholly owned subsidiary of SBC, with and into AT&T.
Following completion of the merger, AT&T will continue as
the surviving corporation of the merger and will become a wholly
owned subsidiary of SBC.
In the Merger You Will Have the Right to Receive 0.77942 of a
Share of SBC Common Stock for each Share of AT&T Common
Stock that You Hold; In Addition, Assuming the Merger is
Completed, AT&T Will Pay a Special Dividend of $1.30 per
Share to Holders of AT&T Common Stock (Page 54)
In the merger, each share of AT&T common stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger will be converted into the right to receive 0.77942 of a
share of SBC common stock, which ratio is referred to in this
document as the exchange ratio, together with any cash paid in
lieu of a fractional share of SBC common stock.
1
You will not receive any fractional share of SBC common stock in
the merger. Instead, SBC will pay you cash for any fractional
share of SBC common stock you otherwise would have been entitled
to receive based on the average closing price for a share of SBC
common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, which
is referred to in this document as the NYSE, composite
transactions reporting system for the 20 trading days ending on
the fifth trading day prior to the closing date of the merger.
For example, if you own 100 shares of AT&T common
stock, and the average closing price for a share of SBC common
stock as reported on the NYSE composite transactions reporting
system for the 20 trading days ending on the fifth trading day
prior to the closing date of the merger was $25.00, you will
receive 77 shares of SBC common stock plus $23.55 in cash
(equal to 0.942 multiplied by $25) in lieu of the fractional
share of SBC common stock you would otherwise have been entitled
to receive.
Immediately after the merger, former AT&T shareholders are
expected to own approximately 16% of the outstanding shares of
SBC common stock (following the issuance of shares of SBC common
stock to the former AT&T shareholders and based on shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2004) (without giving effect
to shares of SBC common stock held by AT&T shareholders
prior to the merger).
In addition, following the date of the adoption of the merger
agreement by AT&T shareholders at the annual meeting and
prior to the effective time of the merger, AT&T will declare
a special dividend of $1.30 per share payable to holders of
record of outstanding shares as of a record date for the special
dividend that will be set by the AT&T board of directors.
Such special dividend will be paid prior to the effective time
of the merger, and AT&T has agreed to use its reasonable
best efforts to cause the special dividend to be paid on the
closing date of the merger. AT&T does not intend to pay
the special dividend unless the merger is to be completed.
The AT&T Board of Directors Recommends that Holders of
AT&T Common Stock Vote to Adopt the Merger Agreement
(Page 33)
After careful consideration, the AT&T board of directors
declared that the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, including the special dividend, are
advisable and adopted the merger agreement. The AT&T board
of directors recommends that holders of AT&T common stock
vote FOR the adoption of the merger agreement.
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding shares of AT&T common stock entitled to vote
on adoption of the merger agreement is required to adopt the
merger agreement. No vote of SBC stockholders is required (or
will be sought) in connection with the merger.
In adopting the merger agreement and making its declaration and
recommendation, the AT&T board of directors consulted with
AT&T senior management and AT&Ts financial and
legal advisors and considered a number of strategic, financial
and other considerations referred to under The
Merger AT&Ts Reasons for the Merger.
Opinions of AT&Ts Financial Advisors
(Page 35)
In connection with the proposed merger, AT&Ts
financial advisors, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, which is
referred to in this document as CSFB, and Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated, which is referred to in this document as
Morgan Stanley, each have delivered an opinion with respect to
the fairness of the exchange ratio or consideration, as
applicable, to be received by the holders of AT&T common
stock in the merger. CSFB rendered its opinion that, as of
January 30, 2005, the exchange ratio was fair, from a
financial point of view, to holders of AT&T common stock and
Morgan Stanley rendered its opinion that the consideration to be
received by holders of AT&T common stock in accordance with
the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to
such holders other than SBC and its affiliates. For purpose of
its analyses CSFB assumed that AT&T will declare a $1.30
special cash dividend per share of AT&T common stock payable
to the holders of AT&T common stock as of immediately prior
to the consummation of the merger. In arriving at its opinion,
Morgan Stanley assumed that the special cash dividend was part
of the consideration. The full texts of the written opinions of
CSFB and Morgan Stanley are attached as Annex B and Annex C,
2
respectively, to this document. You are urged to read each of
the opinions carefully and in its entirety for a description of
the procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on
the review undertaken. The opinions do not constitute a
recommendation to any shareholder as to how they should vote or
act on any matter relating to the merger.
Treatment of AT&T Stock Options and Stock Based Awards
(Page 56)
In the merger, all outstanding AT&T employee stock options
under AT&Ts stock-based benefit plans and agreements
will be converted into options to acquire shares of SBC common
stock, with the number of shares of SBC common stock subject to
option and the exercise price of the options adjusted to give
effect to the exchange ratio of 0.77942 and an equitable
adjustment to take into account the payment of the
$1.30 special dividend in respect of each share of AT&T
common stock. Any AT&T stock-based awards, other than
AT&T stock options, will be similarly converted into
stock-based awards based on a number of shares of SBC common
stock adjusted to give effect to the exchange ratio of 0.77942
and an equitable adjustment to take into account the payment of
the $1.30 special dividend in respect of each share of AT&T
common stock.
AT&Ts Executive Officers and Directors Have
Interests in the Merger that Differ from, or Are in Addition to,
Your Interests in the Merger (Page 44)
You should be aware that some of the directors and executive
officers of AT&T have interests in the merger that are
different from, or are in addition to, the interests of AT&T
shareholders. These interests include, but are not limited to,
the treatment of equity-based compensation awards held by
directors and executive officers of AT&T in the merger, the
continued employment of certain executive officers after the
merger, severance benefits payable to certain executive officers
whose employment is not continued after the merger, the
continued positions of certain directors of AT&T as
directors of SBC, and the indemnification of former AT&T
directors by SBC.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
(Page 48)
If the special dividend is paid by AT&T, it will be paid
following the adoption of the merger agreement and prior to the
effective time of the merger. Based on the advice of its
counsel, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, AT&T intends to
report the payment of the special dividend as a dividend for
United States federal income tax purposes. Generally, individual
holders who meet applicable holding period requirements for
qualified dividends under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, which is referred to in this document as
the Code, will be taxed on the special dividend at a maximum
federal income tax rate of 15%.
The merger has been structured to qualify as a reorganization
under Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal
income tax purposes. It is a condition to the closing of the
merger that AT&T and SBC will receive opinions from
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, respectively, dated as of the closing date of the
merger, to the effect that the merger will qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and that each of SBC, AT&T and Merger Sub will be a
party to such reorganization. In addition, in connection with
the filing of the registration statement of which this document
is a part, AT&T and SBC each will receive a legal opinion to
the same effect.
Accordingly, if the merger is not restructured to include in the
per share merger consideration the per share amount of the
special dividend that would otherwise be payable, a holder of
AT&T common stock will not recognize any gain or loss upon
receipt of SBC common stock solely in exchange for AT&T
common stock, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a
fractional share of SBC common stock.
Alternatively, if the merger is restructured, in order to
satisfy the tax opinion conditions of the merger agreement, to
include in the per share merger consideration the per share
amount of the special dividend that would otherwise be payable,
the material United States federal income consequences to
holders of AT&T common stock will be as follows. If the
holders adjusted tax basis in the AT&T common stock
surrendered is less than the sum of the fair market value, as of
the closing date of the merger, of the SBC common stock and the
amount of cash received by the holder, then the holder will
recognize gain in an amount equal to the lesser
3
of (1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market
value, as of the closing date of the merger, of the SBC common
stock received, minus the adjusted tax basis of the AT&T
common stock surrendered, and (2) the amount of cash
received by the holder in the exchange. However, if a
holders adjusted tax basis in the AT&T common stock
surrendered in the transaction is greater than the sum of the
amount of cash and the fair market value of the SBC common stock
received, the holders loss will not be currently allowed
or recognized for United States federal income tax purposes.
Holders should read The Merger Material United
States Federal Income Tax Consequences starting on
page 48 for a more complete discussion of the United States
federal income tax consequences of the special dividend and the
merger. Holders are urged to consult with their tax advisors
regarding the tax consequences of the special dividend and the
merger to them, including the effects of United States federal,
state and local, foreign and other tax laws.
Procedures for Exchange of AT&T Common Stock for SBC
Common Stock (Page 55)
In most cases, because holders of AT&T common stock hold
their stock in the form of uncertificated shares, the exchange
agent will issue the shares of SBC common stock to which such
holders are entitled against the cancelled shares of AT&T
common stock as soon as practicable after the effective time of
the merger without any further action on the part of those
holders.
However, holders of AT&T share certificates that formerly
represented a number of AT&T common shares prior to
AT&Ts one-for-five reverse stock split, effective
November 19, 2002, will be required to surrender those
share certificates against issuance of the number of shares of
AT&T common stock after giving effect to the stock split,
before they will be issued the number of shares of SBC common
stock to which they are entitled in the merger. At any time
after the effective time of the merger and prior to the
surrender of such share certificates, the share certificates
will be deemed to represent that number of shares of SBC common
stock that the holder is entitled to receive in the merger.
Following the Merger, You Will Be Entitled to Receive the
Dividends SBC Pays on the SBC Common Stock (Page 56)
After the merger, when and if declared by SBCs board of
directors, you will receive any dividends SBC pays on its common
stock. SBCs dividend payment made in the first quarter of
2005 was $0.3225 per share. From January 1, 2004 through
January 1, 2005, a stockholder of SBC would have had
dividends paid in respect of its shares in an aggregate amount
of $1.26 per share.
Accounting Treatment (Page 51)
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of AT&T
by SBC under the purchase method of accounting of U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger (Page 52)
HSR Act and Antitrust. The merger is subject to the
requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
of 1976, as amended, which is referred to in this document as
the HSR Act, which prevents SBC and AT&T from completing the
merger until required information and materials are furnished to
the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, which is
referred to in this document as the DOJ, and the Federal Trade
Commission, which is referred to in this document as the FTC,
and the waiting period is terminated or expires. On
February 22, 2005, SBC and AT&T filed the requisite
Pre-Merger Notification and Report Forms under the HSR Act with
the DOJ and the FTC. On March 24, 2005, the DOJ issued
requests for additional information and documentary material to
SBC and AT&T. The parties are now in the process of
compiling this information and material. As a result, the
waiting period applicable to the merger has been extended until
30 calendar days after both parties have certified that
they have substantially complied with the requests.
4
FCC Approval. The Federal Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, requires the approval of the Federal Communication
Commission, which is referred to in this document as the FCC,
prior to any transfer of control of certain types of licenses
and other authorizations issued by the FCC. On February 22,
2005, SBC and AT&T filed applications for FCC consent to the
transfer of control of AT&T and the AT&T subsidiaries
that hold such licenses and authorizations to SBC.
Applications for FCC consent are subject to public comment and
objections and oppositions of third parties who may interpose
objections. Comments on the applications are due on
April 25, 2005, and reply comments are due on May 10,
2005. The FCC has set for itself a goal of completing action on
transfer of control applications within 180 days of public
notice of the application, which target completion date would be
on or around September 7, 2005 for the applications filed
by SBC and AT&T. However, no law or regulation requires the
FCC to complete its action by that date, or any date, and the
FCC acknowledges that more complex applications may take longer.
State Regulatory Approvals. AT&T and various of its
subsidiaries hold certificates, licenses and service
authorizations issued by the state public utility commissions,
which are referred to in this document as the state PUCs.
Approximately 22 state commissions and the District of Columbia
commission require formal applications for the transfer of
control of these certificates, licenses and authorizations to
SBC. Applications for state approvals are subject to public
comment and objections and oppositions of third parties who may
interpose objections. In addition to these applications, SBC and
AT&T will file notifications of the merger in the remaining
states. In some of these states, the state PUCs could initiate
proceedings in response to the notification. SBC and AT&T
filed these state transfer applications and notifications with
the state PUCs on February 28, 2005. Certain of these state
PUCs have granted their approval as of the date of this
document, while the other state PUCs are still reviewing the
applications.
Municipal Franchises. The merger may require the approval
of municipalities where AT&T holds franchises to provide
communications and other services.
Foreign and Certain Other Regulatory Matters. SBC and
AT&T will be required to obtain approval for the merger
from, or provide notice of the merger to, governmental entities
regulating competition and telecommunications businesses or the
use of radio spectrum or regulating investment in certain
countries outside the United States where AT&T conducts
business.
The merger may be subject to certain regulatory requirements of
other municipal, state, federal and foreign governmental
agencies and authorities.
SBC and AT&T expect that the merger will be completed in
late 2005 or early 2006 (Page 27)
We expect to complete the merger after we receive AT&T
shareholder approval at the annual meeting scheduled to be held
on [l], 2005 and after we receive
all required regulatory approvals. We currently expect to
complete the merger in late 2005 or early 2006. However, it is
possible that factors outside our control could require us to
complete the merger at a later time or not to complete it at
all. See The Merger Regulatory Matters Related
to the Merger beginning on page 52.
You are not entitled to any Rights of Appraisal if you
Dissent from the Merger (Page 53)
Under New York law, the holders of AT&T common stock are not
entitled to any rights of appraisal with respect to the merger.
The Merger Agreement (Page 54)
The merger agreement is described beginning on page 54. The
merger agreement also is attached as Annex A to this
document. We urge you to read the merger agreement in its
entirety because it contains important provisions governing the
terms and conditions of the merger.
5
Acquisition Proposals (Page 62)
Subject to specified legal and fiduciary exceptions, the merger
agreement provides that neither AT&T nor any of its
affiliates will, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate any
inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer, which we refer
to as an acquisition proposal, with respect to |
|
|
|
|
|
a merger, reorganization, share exchange, consolidation or
similar transaction involving AT&T; |
|
|
|
any purchase of an equity interest or interests representing, in
the aggregate, an amount equal to or greater than a 15% voting
or economic interest in AT&T; or |
|
|
|
any purchase of assets, securities or ownership interests
representing an amount equal to or greater than 15% of the
consolidated assets of AT&T and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
have any discussions with, or provide any confidential
information or data to, or engage in any negotiations with, any
person relating to an acquisition proposal, or otherwise
knowingly encourage or facilitate any effort or attempt by any
person other than SBC and Merger Sub to make or implement an
acquisition proposal. |
There are Conditions that Must be Satisfied or Waived Before
SBC and AT&T are Required to Complete the Merger
(Page 66)
SBC, Merger Sub and AT&T are not required to complete the
merger unless a number of conditions are satisfied or waived.
These conditions include:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption of the merger agreement by holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of AT&T common stock entitled to vote on
the matter; |
|
|
|
expiration or early termination of the waiting period applicable
to the consummation of the merger under the HSR Act; |
|
|
|
|
if applicable, approval of the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement by the European Commission,
or the applicable governmental entity of any member state of the
European Union to which the European Commission has referred the
review; |
|
|
|
|
approvals and authorizations required for transfer of
AT&Ts federal and state communications licenses; |
|
|
|
any applicable governmental approvals in the U.K., Germany,
Japan and Canada, plus other govern-mental approvals that, if
not obtained, would: |
|
|
|
|
|
reasonably be expected to result in a specified material adverse
effect (as defined under The Merger Agreement
Covenants and Agreements Reasonable Best
Efforts); or |
|
|
|
provide a reasonable basis to conclude that AT&T, SBC or
their respective directors or officers would be subject to the
risk of criminal liability; |
|
|
|
|
|
absence of any order, injunction or similar action taken by a
governmental entity that prohibits the merger, unless it would
not reasonably be expected to have a specified material adverse
effect or pro-vide a reasonable basis to conclude that AT&T,
SBC or their respective directors or officers would be subject
to the risk of criminal liability; |
|
|
|
the registration statement of which this document forms a part
will have been declared effective by the SEC under the
Securities Act and no stop order suspending its effectiveness
will have been issued or threatened by the SEC; and |
|
|
|
the shares of SBC common stock to be issued in the merger will
have been authorized for listing on the NYSE upon official
notice of issuance. |
6
In addition, SBC and Merger Sub are not required to complete the
merger unless a number of further conditions are satisfied or
waived. These conditions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Specified representations and warranties of AT&T must be
true and correct in all material respects (as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the closing date, except to the
extent that they expressly speak as of an earlier date, in which
case such representation and warranty must be true and correct
as of such earlier date) and the remainder must be true and
correct (without giving effect to any materiality or material
adverse effect qualifications) unless all the inaccuracies taken
together would not have a material adverse effect on AT&T
(as defined under The Merger Agreement
Representations and Warranties). One of the
representations that must be true in all material respects is
the representation that there has been no material adverse
effect or any event, occurrence, discovery or development which
would individually or in the aggregate reasonably be expected to
result in a material adverse effect on AT&T since
December 31, 2003; |
|
|
|
AT&T must have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement at or prior to the closing date; |
|
|
|
no governmental entity of competent jurisdiction will have
instituted any continuing proceeding seeking any order that
restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits the consummation of
the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, and no governmental entity will have instituted any
civil, criminal or administrative proceeding which would, in the
reasonable judgment of SBC, individually or in the aggregate, be
reasonably likely to result in an order reasonably expected to
have a specified material adverse effect or provide a reasonable
basis to conclude that AT&T, SBC or their respective
directors or officers would be subject to the risk of criminal
liability; |
|
|
|
All governmental consents must have been obtained (subject to
certain exceptions). All governmental consents that have been
obtained will have been obtained without the imposition of any
condition which would reasonably be expected to result in a
specified material adverse effect and all required governmental
consents obtained from the FCC must have been obtained by a
final order; |
|
|
|
AT&T must have obtained the consent or approval of each
person whose consent or approval will be required under any
material contract to which AT&T or any of its subsidiaries
is a party in connection with the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement (subject to certain exceptions), except
where the failure to obtain such consent or approval,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to result in a material adverse effect; and |
|
|
|
SBC must have received the opinion of Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, counsel to SBC, dated the closing date, to the
effect that the merger will be treated for United States federal
income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and that each of SBC, Merger
Sub and AT&T will be a party to that reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. |
In addition, AT&T is not required to complete the merger
unless a number of further conditions are satisfied or waived.
These conditions include:
|
|
|
|
|
Specified representations and warranties of SBC and Merger Sub
must be true and correct in all material respects (as of the
date of the merger agreement and as of the closing date, except
to the extent that they expressly speak as of an earlier date,
in which case such representation and warranty must be true and
correct as of such earlier date) and the remainder must be true
and correct (without giving effect to any materiality or
material adverse effect qualifications) unless all the
inaccuracies taken together would not have a material adverse
effect on SBC; |
|
|
|
Each of SBC and Merger Sub must have performed in all material
respects all obligations required to be performed by it under
the merger agreement at or prior to the closing date; and |
|
|
|
AT&T must have received the opinion of Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, counsel to AT&T, dated the closing
date, to the effect that the merger will be treated for United
States federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and that each of
SBC, |
7
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Sub and AT&T will be a party to that reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. |
Under Some Conditions SBC or AT&T May Terminate the
Merger Agreement (Page 68)
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger
by mutual written consent of AT&T and SBC. Also, either
AT&T or SBC may terminate the merger agreement if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is not consummated by January 31, 2006, unless
the closing conditions with respect to certain orders of
governmental entities and required governmental consents have
not been satisfied by January 31, 2006, in which case SBC
or AT&T may extend the termination date one or more times to
a date not beyond July 31, 2006, provided that if a
required governmental consent has been obtained but is not yet a
final order, neither party may terminate the merger agreement
prior to the 60th day after receipt of such required
governmental consent; |
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by AT&T shareholders
was not obtained at the shareholders meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of such meeting; or |
|
|
|
any order of a governmental entity permanently restraining,
enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the
merger becomes final and non-appealable, except for any orders
the existence of which would not result in the failure of the
closing condition described in the fifth bullet point under
There are Conditions that Must be Satisfied or
Waived Before SBC and AT&T are Required to Complete the
Merger above. |
The foregoing rights to terminate the merger agreement will not
be available to any party that has breached its obligations
under the merger agreement in any manner that will have
proximately contributed to the occurrence of the failure of a
condition to the consummation of the merger.
In addition, the merger agreement may be terminated and the
merger may be abandoned prior to the effective time of the
merger by the AT&T board of directors if the AT&T board
of directors (after complying with its obligations under the
merger agreement) authorizes AT&T to enter into a binding
written agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a
superior proposal to the merger and AT&T pays the
termination fee to SBC or if there has been a breach of any
representation, warranty, covenant or agreement made by SBC or
Merger Sub that is not curable by the termination date.
Furthermore, the merger agreement may be terminated and the
merger may be abandoned prior to the effective time of the
merger agreement by SBCs board of directors if:
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of AT&T has withdrawn, modified or
qualified, or has agreed to withdraw, modify or qualify, in fact
or in substance, its adoption of the merger agreement or its
recommendation of the merger in a manner adverse to SBC; |
|
|
|
there has been a breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement made by AT&T that is not curable by
the termination date; |
|
|
|
by the later of 120 days after the date of the merger
agreement or 60 days after effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this document forms a part,
AT&Ts shareholders meeting has not been held, or the
vote of AT&Ts shareholders has not been taken, unless
AT&T has used its reasonable best efforts to convene the
shareholders meeting and hold such vote by the later of such
dates; or |
|
|
|
AT&T knowingly and materially and not inadvertently breaches
its obligations under the merger agreement relating to
acquisition proposals. |
8
Under Some Circumstances AT&T Will Be Required to Pay a
Termination Fee to SBC if the Merger Agreement is Terminated
(Page 69)
AT&T is required to pay SBC a termination fee of
$560 million and all documented out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by SBC or Merger Sub in connection with the merger
(subject to a cap of $40 million), if:
|
|
|
|
|
a bona fide acquisition proposal, but substituting 40% for the
15% thresholds described under The Merger
AgreementCovenants and AgreementsAcquisition
Proposals, has been made to AT&T or any of its
subsidiaries or its shareholders and such proposal becomes
publicly known, or any person publicly announces an intention,
whether or not conditional, to make such a proposal with respect
to AT&T or any of its subsidiaries, and such proposal or
announced intention are not withdrawn at the time of the
AT&T shareholders meeting, and |
|
|
|
|
|
either SBC or AT&T terminates the merger agreement because
the adoption of the merger agreement by AT&T shareholders
was not obtained at the shareholders meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of such meeting, or |
|
|
|
SBC terminates the merger agreement because by the later of
120 days after the date of the merger agreement or
60 days after effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this document forms a part, AT&Ts
shareholders meeting has not been held, or the vote of
AT&Ts shareholders has not been taken (unless AT&T
has used its reasonable best efforts to convene the shareholders
meeting and hold the vote by the later of those dates); |
|
|
|
Provided that AT&T will not have to pay the termination fee
to SBC, but will be obligated to pay all documented
out-of-pocket expenses incurred by SBC or Merger Sub in
connection with the merger (subject to a cap of $40 million),
unless and until: |
|
|
|
|
|
any person (other than SBC) has acquired, in one or a series of
related transactions, within 15 months of the termination,
a majority of the voting power of the outstanding securities of
AT&T or all or substantially all of AT&Ts assets
or has entered into an agreement with AT&T for such an
acquisition within 15 months of the termination; or |
|
|
|
a merger, consolidation or similar business combination has been
consummated between AT&T or one of its subsidiaries and an
acquiring person (other than SBC) within 15 months of the
termination of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
SBC terminates the merger agreement because the board of
directors of AT&T has withdrawn, modified or qualified, or
has agreed to withdraw, modify or qualify, in fact or in
substance, its adoption of the merger agreement or its
recommendation of the merger in a manner adverse to SBC and, at
the time of the withdrawal, modification or qualification of the
adoption of the merger agreement or the recommendation of the
merger (or the agreement to do so), a bona fide acquisition
proposal described in the first bullet point of this section (or
any bona fide indication of interest that is reasonably capable
of becoming such a bona fide acquisition proposal) has been made
to AT&T or any of its subsidiaries or its shareholders,
directly or indirectly through any representatives of AT&T,
or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or
not conditional) to make such a bona fide acquisition proposal
with respect to AT&T or any of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
SBC terminates the merger agreement because AT&T knowingly
and materially and not inadvertently breaches its obligations
under the merger agreement relating to acquisition
proposals; or |
|
|
|
AT&T terminates the merger agreement because its board of
directors authorizes AT&T to enter into a binding written
agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a superior
proposal. |
Comparison of Stockholder Rights (Page 126)
The conversion of your shares of AT&T common stock into the
right to receive shares of SBC common stock in the merger will
result in differences between your rights as an AT&T
shareholder, which are governed by the New York Business
Corporation Law and AT&Ts restated certificate of
incorporation and by-laws, and your rights as an SBC
stockholder, which are governed by the Delaware General
Corporation Law and SBCs restated certificate of
incorporation and by-laws.
9
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF SBC
The following statements of operations data for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 have
been derived from SBCs audited consolidated financial
statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which are
incorporated into this document by reference. The statements of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2001 and
2000 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000 have been derived from SBCs audited
consolidated financial statements for such years, which have not
been incorporated into this document by reference.
You should read this selected historical financial data together
with the financial statements that are incorporated by reference
in this document and their accompanying notes and
managements discussion and analysis of operations and
financial condition of SBC contained in such reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share data) | |
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
40,787 |
|
|
$ |
40,498 |
|
|
$ |
42,821 |
|
|
$ |
45,381 |
|
|
$ |
50,881 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,901 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
8,438 |
|
|
|
10,296 |
|
|
|
10,303 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
4,979 |
|
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
6,881 |
|
|
|
7,696 |
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
Earnings per common share assuming dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
108,844 |
|
|
$ |
100,233 |
|
|
$ |
95,170 |
|
|
$ |
96,416 |
|
|
$ |
98,735 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
21,231 |
|
|
|
16,097 |
|
|
|
18,578 |
|
|
|
17,153 |
|
|
|
15,513 |
|
Dividends declared per common share(1)
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.025 |
|
|
$ |
1.015 |
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$ |
12.27 |
|
|
$ |
11.57 |
|
|
$ |
10.01 |
|
|
$ |
9.82 |
|
|
$ |
9.09 |
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
Debt ratio(3)
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Employees
|
|
|
162,700 |
|
|
|
168,950 |
|
|
|
175,980 |
|
|
|
193,420 |
|
|
|
220,090 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Dividends declared by SBCs board of directors reflect the
following: in 2003, includes three additional dividends totaling
$0.25 per share above SBCs regular quarterly dividend
payout. |
|
|
(2) |
The computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges is
included as Exhibit 12 to the registration statement of
which this document forms a part. |
|
|
|
(3) |
Debt ratio reflects debt as a percentage of total capital
calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Total Debt
|
|
|
26,965 |
|
|
|
17,976 |
|
|
|
22,083 |
|
|
|
26,186 |
|
|
|
25,983 |
|
Total Equity(a)
|
|
|
40,504 |
|
|
|
38,248 |
|
|
|
33,199 |
|
|
|
32,919 |
|
|
|
31,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
67,469 |
|
|
|
56,224 |
|
|
|
55,282 |
|
|
|
59,105 |
|
|
|
57,765 |
|
Debt as percentage of total capital
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
39.9 |
% |
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
45.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Total equity in 2000 includes Corporation-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts of $1,000. |
10
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF AT&T
The following results of operations data for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and the balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 have been
derived from AT&Ts audited consolidated financial
statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which are
incorporated into this document by reference. The results of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2001 and
2000 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002,
2001 and 2000 have been derived from AT&Ts audited
consolidated financial statements for such years, which have not
been incorporated into this document by reference.
You should read this selected historical financial data together
with the financial statements that are incorporated by reference
in this document and their accompanying notes and
managements discussion and analysis of operations and
financial condition of AT&T contained in such reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions, except per share data) | |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
30,537 |
|
|
$ |
34,529 |
|
|
$ |
37,827 |
|
|
$ |
42,197 |
|
|
$ |
46,850 |
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(10,088 |
) |
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
|
12,793 |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(6,469 |
) |
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
(2,640 |
) |
|
|
9,532 |
|
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations and (Loss) Earnings per
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT&T Common Stock Group(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
|
|
$ |
(6,469 |
) |
|
$ |
1,863 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
8,044 |
|
|
(Loss) earnings per basic share
|
|
|
(8.14 |
) |
|
|
2.37 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
11.54 |
|
|
(Loss) earnings per diluted share
|
|
|
(8.14 |
) |
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
11.01 |
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
3.4875 |
|
Liberty Media Group(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,711 |
) |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
(Loss) earnings per basic and diluted share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.05 |
) |
|
|
0.58 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
11,509 |
|
|
$ |
24,376 |
|
|
$ |
25,604 |
|
|
$ |
26,803 |
|
|
$ |
26,083 |
|
Total assets continuing operations
|
|
|
32,804 |
|
|
|
47,988 |
|
|
|
55,437 |
|
|
|
62,329 |
|
|
|
90,293 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
32,804 |
|
|
|
47,988 |
|
|
|
55,437 |
|
|
|
165,481 |
|
|
|
242,802 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
8,779 |
|
|
|
13,066 |
|
|
|
18,812 |
|
|
|
24,025 |
|
|
|
13,572 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
10,665 |
|
|
|
14,409 |
|
|
|
22,574 |
|
|
|
34,159 |
|
|
|
42,338 |
|
Shareowners equity
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
|
|
12,312 |
|
|
|
51,680 |
|
|
|
103,198 |
|
Debt ratio(2)
|
|
|
60.3 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
64.7 |
% |
|
|
86.3 |
% |
|
|
122.1 |
% |
OTHER INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees continuing operations(3)
|
|
|
47,600 |
|
|
|
61,600 |
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
|
77,700 |
|
|
|
84,800 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In connection with the March 9, 1999 merger with
Tele-Communications, Inc., AT&T issued separate tracking
stock for Liberty Media Group (LMG). LMG was accounted for as an
equity investment prior to its split-off from AT&T on
August 10, 2001. There were no dividends declared for LMG
tracking stock. AT&T Common Stock Group results exclude LMG. |
|
|
(2) |
Debt ratio reflects debt from continuing operations as a
percentage of total capital, calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Total debt
|
|
$ |
10,665 |
|
|
$ |
14,409 |
|
|
$ |
22,574 |
|
|
$ |
34,159 |
|
|
$ |
42,338 |
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareowners equity
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
|
|
12,312 |
|
|
|
51,680 |
|
|
|
103,198 |
|
|
Less discontinued operations
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
46,257 |
|
|
|
76,627 |
|
|
Less LMG
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
13,956 |
|
|
|
12,312 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
(7,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
17,684 |
|
|
|
28,365 |
|
|
|
34,886 |
|
|
|
39,582 |
|
|
|
34,675 |
|
Debt as percentage of total capital
|
|
|
60.3 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
64.7 |
% |
|
|
86.3 |
% |
|
|
122.1 |
% |
|
|
(3) |
Data provided excludes LMG. |
11
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial data of SBC and AT&T as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2004. The pro forma amounts
in the table below are based upon the historical financial
statements of SBC and AT&T adjusted to give effect to the
merger. It has been assumed for purposes of the pro forma
financial data provided that the merger was completed on
January 1, 2004 for income statement purposes, and on
December 31, 2004 for balance sheet purposes. These pro
forma amounts have been derived from (a) the audited
consolidated financial statements of SBC contained in its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, which are incorporated by reference in
this document, and (b) the audited consolidated financial
statements of AT&T contained in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which
are incorporated by reference in this document.
The pro forma financial data in the table below is provided for
illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent
what the actual consolidated results of operations or the
consolidated financial position of SBC would have been had the
merger occurred on the date assumed, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future consolidated results of operations or
financial position.
The pro forma financial data in the table below does not include
the realization of cost savings from operating efficiencies,
revenue synergies or restructuring costs resulting from the
merger. You should read this information in conjunction with the
separate historical consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes of SBC and AT&T that are incorporated by
reference in this document and the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Financial Information beginning on page 73.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
|
year ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions, | |
|
|
except per share | |
|
|
data) | |
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
69,485 |
|
Operating (loss)
|
|
|
(3,188 |
) |
(Loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
(Loss) from continuing operations per basic and diluted share
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
152,324 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
30,968 |
|
Debt ratio(1)
|
|
|
41.1 |
% |
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
55,361 |
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Employees
|
|
|
210,300 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Debt ratio reflects pro forma debt as percentage of total
capital calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
($ in millions) | |
Total Debt
|
|
$ |
38,588 |
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
55,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (debt plus equity)
|
|
|
93,949 |
|
Debt as percentage of total capital
|
|
|
41.1 |
% |
12
UNAUDITED COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
The following table summarizes unaudited per share information
for SBC and AT&T on a historical basis, a pro forma combined
basis for SBC and an equivalent pro forma combined basis for
AT&T. It has been assumed, for purposes of the pro forma
financial information provided, that the merger was completed on
January 1, 2004 for income statement purposes, and on
December 31, 2004 for balance sheet purposes. The following
information should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of SBC and AT&T at and for
the year ended December 31, 2004, which are incorporated by
reference into this document, and the Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Financial Information beginning on
page 73. The pro forma information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of
the operating results or financial position that would have
occurred if the merger had been completed as of the beginning of
the period presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of the
future operating results or financial position of the combined
company. The historical book value per share is computed by
dividing total stockholders equity by the number of common
shares outstanding at the end of the period. The pro forma per
share loss from continuing operations of the combined company is
computed by dividing the pro forma loss from continuing
operations available to holders of the combined companys
common stock by the pro forma weighted average number of shares
outstanding. The pro forma combined book value per share is
computed by dividing total pro forma stockholders equity
by the pro forma number of common shares outstanding at the end
of the period. AT&T equivalent pro forma combined per share
amounts are calculated by multiplying the pro forma combined per
share amounts by 0.77942, the fraction of a share of SBC common
stock that would be exchanged for each share of AT&T common
stock in the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
SBC Historical
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
12.27 |
|
AT&T Historical
|
|
|
|
|
Historical per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(8.14 |
) |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma share of SBC common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
14.11 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma AT&T Equivalents(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited pro forma per AT&T common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) per share from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
(1) |
AT&T equivalent per share amounts are calculated by
multiplying SBC per share amounts by the exchange ratio of
0.77942. |
13
COMPARATIVE MARKET DATA
The SBC common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
SBC, as well as on the Chicago and Pacific stock
exchanges and the Swiss Exchange. The SBC common stock also
trades on the London Stock Exchange through the SEAQ
International Markets facility. The AT&T common stock is
listed on the NYSE under the symbol T, as well as on
the Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Pacific and Philadelphia
exchanges in the U.S., and on the Euronext-Paris, the IDR
(International Depository Receipt) Exchange in Brussels and the
London and Geneva stock exchanges. The following table presents
trading information for SBC and AT&T common stock on
January 28, 2005, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the execution of the merger agreement, and
[l], 2005, the latest practicable
trading day before the date of this document. You should read
the information presented below in conjunction with
Comparative Per Share Market Price Data and Dividend
Information on page 15.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBC Common Stock | |
|
AT&T Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 28, 2005
|
|
$ |
23.69 |
|
|
$ |
23.33 |
|
|
$ |
23.62 |
|
|
$ |
20.01 |
|
|
$ |
19.48 |
|
|
$ |
19.71 |
|
[day prior to printing]
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
For illustrative purposes, the following table provides AT&T
equivalent per share information on each of the relevant dates.
AT&T equivalent per share amounts are calculated by
multiplying SBC per share amounts by the exchange ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBC Common Stock | |
|
AT&T Equivalent Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Close | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
January 28, 2005
|
|
$ |
23.69 |
|
|
$ |
23.33 |
|
|
$ |
23.62 |
|
|
$ |
18.46 |
|
|
$ |
18.18 |
|
|
$ |
18.41 |
|
[day prior to printing]
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
14
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE DATA AND DIVIDEND
INFORMATION
The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated,
the high and low sales prices per share reported on the NYSE
composite transactions reporting system and the dividends
declared on SBC common stock and on AT&T common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBC | |
|
|
|
AT&T | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
31.65 |
|
|
|
18.85 |
|
|
|
0.3325 |
|
|
|
27.88 |
|
|
|
15.75 |
|
|
|
0.1875 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.35 |
|
|
|
19.65 |
|
|
|
0.3825 |
|
|
|
21.84 |
|
|
|
13.45 |
|
|
|
0.1875 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
26.88 |
|
|
|
21.65 |
|
|
|
0.3825 |
|
|
|
23.18 |
|
|
|
18.80 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
26.15 |
|
|
|
21.16 |
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
21.95 |
|
|
|
18.31 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
27.73 |
|
|
|
23.18 |
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
22.10 |
|
|
|
18.70 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
25.68 |
|
|
|
23.50 |
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
19.75 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
26.88 |
|
|
|
22.98 |
|
|
|
0.3125 |
|
|
|
15.85 |
|
|
|
13.59 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
27.29 |
|
|
|
24.55 |
|
|
|
0.3225 |
|
|
|
19.87 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
25.98 |
|
|
|
22.99 |
|
|
|
0.3225 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
17.59 |
|
|
|
0.2375 |
|
Second Quarter (through April 18, 2005)
|
|
|
24.33 |
|
|
|
22.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.38 |
|
|
|
18.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
On
[ l ],
2005, the latest practicable trading day prior to the date of
this document, the last sale price per share of SBC common stock
was
$[ l ]
and the last sale price per share of AT&T common stock was
$[ l ],
in each case on the NYSE composite transactions reporting system.
We urge you to obtain current market quotations for SBC and
AT&T common stock before making any decision regarding the
merger.
15
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference into this document, including the matters addressed
under the caption Cautionary Statement Concerning
Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 143, and
including the matters addressed under the caption
Item 1. Business What Special
Considerations Should Investors Consider? in
AT&Ts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by reference
into this document, you should carefully consider the matters
described below in deciding whether to vote for adoption of the
merger agreement.
Risk Factors Relating to the Merger
Because the market price of shares of SBC common stock
will fluctuate, you cannot be sure of the market value of the
shares of SBC common stock you will receive in the
merger.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of AT&T common
stock that you hold will be converted into the right to receive
0.77942 of a share of SBC common stock. There will be no
adjustment to the exchange ratio for changes in the market price
of either shares of AT&T common stock or SBC common stock
and the merger agreement does not provide for any price-based
termination right. Accordingly, the market value of the shares
of SBC common stock that you will be entitled to receive upon
completion of the merger will depend on the market value of the
shares of SBC common stock at the time of the completion of the
merger and could vary significantly from the market value on the
date of this document or the date of AT&Ts 2005 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. The market value of the shares of SBC
common stock you will be entitled to receive in the merger also
will continue to fluctuate after the completion of the merger.
For example, during the third and fourth calendar quarters of
2004, the sale price of SBC common stock ranged from a low of
$22.98 to a high of $27.29, all as reported on the NYSE
composite transactions reporting system. See Comparative
Per Share Market Price Data and Dividend Information
beginning on page 15.
Such variations could be the result of changes in the business,
operations or prospects of AT&T, SBC prior to the merger or
SBC following the merger, market assessments of the likelihood
that the merger will be completed or the timing of the
completion of the merger, regulatory considerations, general
market and economic conditions and other factors both within and
beyond the control of SBC or AT&T. Because the date that the
merger is completed will be later than the date of
AT&Ts 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at the time
of the meeting you will not know the value of the SBC common
stock that you will receive upon completion of the merger.
The merger is subject to the receipt of consents and
approvals from government entities that may impose conditions
that could have an adverse effect on SBC or could cause
abandonment of the merger.
Consummation of the merger is conditioned upon the expiration or
termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act
and the making of certain filings with and notices to, and the
receipt of consents, orders and approvals from, various local,
state, federal and foreign governmental entities, including the
FCC. Certain of these consents, orders and approvals will entail
the relevant governmental entitys considering the effect
of the merger on competition in various jurisdictions. The terms
and conditions of such consents, orders and approvals may
require the divestiture of certain assets or operations of SBC
following the merger or may impose other conditions.
There can be no assurance that SBC and AT&T will obtain the
necessary consents, orders and approvals or that any such
required divestitures or other conditions will not have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, business or
results of operations of SBC following the merger or cause the
abandonment of the merger by SBC and AT&T. SBC and AT&T
have not determined how they will respond to conditions,
limitations or divestitures that may be sought by governmental
entities in connection with any requisite approvals. See
The Merger Regulatory Matters Related to the
Merger beginning on page 52 and The Merger
Agreement Conditions to the Merger beginning
on page 66.
16
Any delay in completing the merger may reduce or eliminate
the benefits expected.
In addition to the required regulatory clearances and approvals,
the merger is subject to a number of other conditions beyond the
control of SBC and AT&T that may prevent, delay or otherwise
materially adversely affect its completion. We cannot predict
whether and when these other conditions will be satisfied.
Further, the requirements for obtaining the required clearances
and approvals could delay the completion of the merger for a
significant period of time or prevent it from occurring. Any
delay in completing the merger could cause SBC following the
merger not to realize some or all of the synergies that SBC
expects to achieve if it successfully completes the merger
within its expected timeframe and integrates its business with
AT&Ts business. See The Merger
AgreementConditions to the Merger.
The pendency of the merger could materially adversely
affect the future business and operations of SBC and
AT&T.
In connection with the pending merger, some customers and
strategic partners of each of SBC and AT&T may delay or
defer decisions, which could negatively impact revenues,
earnings and cash flows of SBC and AT&T, as well as the
market prices of shares of SBC common stock and AT&T common
stock, regardless of whether the merger is completed. Similarly,
current and prospective employees of SBC and AT&T may
experience uncertainty about their future roles with SBC
following the merger, which may materially adversely affect the
ability of each of SBC and AT&T to attract and retain key
management, sales, marketing, technical and other personnel. In
addition, some rating agencies that provide security ratings on
SBCs and AT&Ts debts may downgrade their ratings
on these debts of one company or both companies in light of the
pending merger. A downgrade could materially adversely affect
the ability of SBC and AT&T to finance their operations,
including increasing the cost of obtaining financing. For
information regarding security ratings on AT&Ts debt,
see AT&Ts Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, which are incorporated into
this document by reference. Finally, if the merger is terminated
and AT&T determines to seek another business combination, it
cannot assure you that it will be able to negotiate a
transaction with another company on terms comparable to the
terms of the merger.
Directors of AT&T may have potential conflicts of
interest in recommending that you vote in favor of the adoption
of the merger agreement.
Directors of AT&T have arrangements or other interests that
provide them with interests in the merger that differ from
yours. In addition, the merger agreement provides that
Mr. Dorman and two other directors of AT&T will become
directors of SBC while other directors will not, and in either
case SBC will indemnify and maintain liability insurance for
each of the AT&T directors services as directors of
AT&T prior to the merger. See The Merger
Interests of AT&T Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger beginning on page 44.
The merger agreement restricts AT&Ts ability to
pursue alternatives to the merger.
The merger agreement contains no shop provisions
that, subject to limited fiduciary exceptions, restrict
AT&Ts ability to directly or indirectly initiate,
solicit, knowingly encourage or facilitate, discuss or commit to
competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant
part of AT&T. Further, there are only limited exceptions to
AT&Ts agreement that the AT&T board of directors
will not withdraw, modify or qualify in a manner adverse to SBC
its adoption of the merger agreement or its recommendation to
holders of AT&T common stock that they vote in favor of
adopting the merger agreement, or recommend any other
acquisition proposal, and SBC generally has a right to match any
competing acquisition proposals that may be made. Although the
AT&T board of directors is permitted to take these actions
if it determines that these actions are necessary to comply with
its fiduciary duties, doing so in specified situations could
entitle SBC to terminate the merger agreement and to be paid by
AT&T a termination fee of $560 million and
reimbursement of expenses of up to $40 million. Also, in
some situations where a competing acquisition proposal has been
made known to AT&T or the public and the merger agreement is
subsequently terminated, either by SBC or AT&T, for failure
of AT&T shareholders to adopt the merger agreement at the
AT&T shareholder meeting or for unexcused failure to hold
the AT&T shareholder meeting within certain deadlines,
AT&T would be required
17
to reimburse SBC its expenses of up to $40 million and, in
addition, the termination fee of $560 million could become
payable if AT&T completes, or enters into an agreement with
respect to, an alternative acquisition transaction during the
15 months following the termination. See The Merger
Agreement Covenants and Agreements
Acquisition Proposals, Termination
and Termination Fees and Expenses.
SBC required that AT&T agree to these provisions as a
condition to SBCs willingness to enter into the merger
agreement. However, these provisions could discourage a
potential competing acquiror that might have an interest in
acquiring all or a significant part of AT&T from considering
or proposing that acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay
consideration with a higher per share cash or market value than
that proposed to be paid in the merger, or might result in a
potential competing acquiror proposing to pay a lower per share
price to acquire AT&T than it might otherwise have proposed
to pay because of the added expense of the termination fee that
may become payable to SBC in certain circumstances.
Risk Factors Relating to SBC Following the Merger
|
|
|
SBC may fail to realize the anticipated cost savings,
revenue enhancements and other benefits expected from the
merger, which could adversely affect the value of SBC common
stock after the merger. |
The merger involves the integration of two companies that have
previously operated independently. SBC and AT&T entered into
the merger agreement with the expectation that the merger would
combine AT&Ts global systems capabilities, business
and government customers and Internet protocol business with
SBCs local exchange, broadband and wireless solutions and
create opportunities to achieve cost savings, revenue synergies,
technological development and other synergistic benefits.
The value of SBC common stock following consummation of the
merger may be affected by the ability of SBC to achieve the
benefits expected to result from consummation of the merger.
Achieving the benefits of the merger will depend in part upon
meeting the challenges inherent in the successful combination of
two business enterprises of the size and scope of SBC and
AT&T and the possible resulting diversion of management
attention for an extended period of time. There can be no
assurance that such challenges will be met and that such
diversion will not negatively impact the operations of SBC
following the merger.
Delays encountered in the transition process could have a
material adverse effect on the revenues, expenses, operating
results and financial condition of SBC following the merger.
Although SBC and AT&T expect significant benefits, such as
increased cost savings, to result from the merger, there can be
no assurance that SBC will realize any of these anticipated
benefits. See The Merger AT&Ts
Reasons for the Merger beginning on page 30.
|
|
|
SBC is expected to incur substantial expenses related to
the integration of AT&T. |
SBC is expected to incur substantial expenses in connection with
the integration of the businesses, policies, procedures,
operations, technologies and systems of AT&T with those of
SBC. There are a large number of systems that must be
integrated, including management information, purchasing,
accounting and finance, sales, billing, payroll and benefits,
fixed asset and lease administration systems and regulatory
compliance. While SBC has assumed that a certain level of
expenses would be incurred, there are a number of factors beyond
its control that could affect the total amount or the timing of
all of the expected integration expenses including, among
others, constraints arising under U.S. federal or state
antitrust laws (such as limitations on sharing of information),
that may prevent or hinder SBC from fully developing integration
plans. Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred, by
their nature, are impracticable to estimate at the present time.
These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the
savings that SBC expects to achieve from the elimination of
duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale
and cost savings and revenue synergies related to the
integration of the businesses following the completion of the
merger. These integration expenses likely will result in SBC
taking significant charges against earnings, both cash and
non-cash, primarily from the amortization of intangibles and
one-time impairments, following the completion of the merger,
but the amount and timing of such charges are uncertain at
present.
18
|
|
|
SBC expects the merger will slow its revenue growth rate
in the near term following the merger. |
AT&Ts revenues have declined over recent years as it
has transitioned from a voice long distance business to one with
an emphasis on business and data services, and those declines
are expected to continue. As a result, SBC expects that the
merger will slow its revenue growth rate in the near term
following the completion of the merger and the merger will not
have an incremental positive contribution to its earnings until
2008, as described in The Merger SBCs
Reasons for the Merger Cost Savings and Revenue
Synergies beginning on page 28. A slower revenue
growth rate may in turn have a negative impact on the share
price of the SBC common stock.
|
|
|
Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause a loss
of employees. |
The success of SBC after the merger will depend in part upon the
ability of SBC to retain key AT&T employees as well as SBC
employees. Competition for qualified personnel can be very
intense. In addition, key employees may depart because of issues
relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a
desire not to remain with SBC following the merger. Accordingly,
no assurance can be given that SBC will be able to retain key
employees to the same extent that it or AT&T has been able
to do so in the past.
Technological innovation is important to SBCs success and
depends, to a significant degree, on the work of technically
skilled employees. Competition for the services of these types
of employees is vigorous. We cannot assure you that SBC will be
able to attract and retain these employees following the merger.
If, following the merger, SBC were unable to attract and
maintain technically skilled employees, its competitive position
could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
SBC will continue to face significant competition, which
may reduce its market share and lower its profits. |
Rapid development in telecommunications technologies, such as
wireless, cable and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), has
significantly increased competition in the telecommunications
industry. As a result, SBC will compete with not only
traditional rivals such as long distance carriers, but also new
competitors such as cable companies and satellite companies.
These competitors are typically subject to less or no regulation
and therefore are able to offer services at lower cost. In
addition, these competitors also have lower cost structures
compared to SBC, due in part to the absences of a unionized
workforce at the competitors, their offering of lower benefits
to employees and their having fewer retirees (as most of the
competitors are relatively new companies). The increased
competition will put further pressure on the price of the
services provided by SBC following the merger and may result in
reduced revenues and loss of profits.
|
|
|
SBCs future growth will depend upon its ability to
implement its business strategy. |
SBCs business strategy following the merger will be
focused on becoming a global leader in providing integrated,
high-quality and competitively priced communications solutions
and services. SBC cannot assure you that the implementation of
these initiatives will not be delayed, or that they will ever be
successfully implemented, whether due to factors within
SBCs control, such as failure to execute these
initiatives, or factors outside of SBCs control, such as a
change in general economic or regulatory conditions. Even if
implemented, SBC cannot assure you that these initiatives will
allow SBC to increase its revenues from its existing service
offerings or from emerging communications services.
|
|
|
SBCs ability to maintain leading technological
capabilities is uncertain. |
SBCs operating results will depend to a significant extent
upon its ability to continue to expand in other communications
services and to reduce costs of its existing services. SBC
cannot assure you that it will successfully develop and market
new service opportunities in a timely or cost-effective manner.
The success of new service development depends on many factors,
including proper identification of customer needs, cost, timely
completion and introduction, differentiation from offerings of
competitors and market acceptance.
Technology in the telecommunications industry changes rapidly as
new technologies are developed, which could cause the services
and products of SBC to become obsolete. SBC cannot assure you
that it and its
19
suppliers will be able to keep pace with technological
developments. If the new technologies on which SBC intends to
focus its research and development investments fail to achieve
acceptance in the marketplace, SBC could suffer a material
adverse effect on its future competitive position that could
cause a reduction in its revenues and earnings. For example,
competitors of SBC could be the first to obtain proprietary
technologies that are perceived by the marketplace as being
superior. Furthermore, after substantial research and
development costs, one or more of the technologies under
development by SBC or any of its strategic partners could become
obsolete prior to its introduction. In addition, delays in the
delivery of components or other unforeseen problems in
SBCs telecommunication systems may occur that could
materially adversely affect its ability to generate revenue,
offer new services and remain competitive.
|
|
|
The combined companys indebtedness following the
completion of the merger will be higher than SBCs existing
indebtedness. |
The indebtedness of SBC as of December 31, 2004 was
approximately $27.0 billion. SBCs pro forma
indebtedness as of December 31, 2004, giving effect to the
merger (as described in Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Financial Information on page 73), would
have been approximately $38.6 billion. As a result of the
increase in debt, demands on SBCs cash resources will
increase after the merger, which could have important effects on
an investment in SBC common stock. For example, while the impact
of this increased indebtedness will be addressed by the combined
cash flows of SBC and AT&T, the increased levels of
indebtedness could nonetheless:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce funds available to SBC for investment in research and
development and capital expenditures; or |
|
|
|
create competitive disadvantages for SBC compared to other
companies with lower debt levels. |
|
|
|
Changes to domestic and foreign regulations may materially
restrict SBCs ability to obtain requisite regulatory
approvals for its operations. |
Following the merger, SBC will continue to be subject to various
U.S. federal regulations, including substantial regulation by
the FCC. FCC rules and regulations are subject to change in
response to industry developments, changes in law, new
technologies and political considerations. In addition, SBC also
will continue to be subject to the regulatory authority of state
commissions which have the power to regulate intrastate rates
and services, including local, long-distance and network access
services, and the national communications authorities of the
countries in which it operates.
SBCs business could be materially adversely affected by
the adoption of new laws, policies and regulations or changes to
existing regulations. The development of new technologies, such
as Internet Protocol-based services including VoIP and super
high-speed broadband and video, for example, have created or
potentially could create conflicting regulation between the FCC
and various state and local authorities, which may involve
lengthy litigation to resolve and may result in outcomes
unfavorable to SBC. In particular, we cannot assure you that SBC
will succeed in obtaining all requisite regulatory approvals for
its operations without the imposition of restrictions on its
business, which could have a detrimental effect on SBC by
imposing material additional costs on SBC or by limiting its
revenues.
|
|
|
The regulatory regime under which SBC will operate could
change to the detriment of SBC. |
In the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Telecom Act), Congress
established a pro-competitive, deregulatory national policy
framework to bring the benefits of competition and investment in
advanced telecommunications facilities and services to all
Americans by opening all telecommunications markets to
competition and reducing or eliminating burdensome regulation.
Since the Telecom Act was passed, the FCC and state regulatory
commissions have maintained many of the extensive regulatory
requirements applicable to incumbent local exchange companies
(ILECs), including SBCs wireline subsidiaries, and imposed
significant new regulatory requirements in a purported effort to
jump-start a specific definition of competition.
In three successive orders (each of which was subsequently
overturned by the federal courts as discussed below), the FCC
required SBC to lease parts of its network (unbundled network
elements, or UNEs) in a
20
combined form known as the UNE-P to competitive local exchange
carriers (CLECs), including AT&T and MCI Inc. The state PUCs
set the wholesale rates that SBC is allowed to charge its
competitors for UNEs by utilizing the FCC prescribed Total
Element Long Run Incremental Cost (TELRIC) methodology.
TELRIC allows the state PUCs to set UNE rates by estimating the
forward-looking cost of building and operating a hypothetical
network that utilizes the most efficient technology available.
While many of the state PUCs in the 13-state area where SBC
operates have raised certain UNE rates in the last year, SBC
believes that overall UNE rates continue to be below
SBCs actual cost of providing services utilizing the
existing network. Competitors have used these low rates to
target many of SBCs highest revenue customers.
In March 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) overturned
significant portions of the FCCs third order on unbundling
requirements for SBCs traditional network, including those
mandating the availability of the UNE-P. In the same decision,
the court upheld the FCCs decision to limit SBCs
obligation to provide competitors unbundled access to new
broadband elements. Since the D.C. Circuits March
2004 decision, the FCC has encouraged both ILECs and CLECs to
negotiate private commercial agreements regarding access and
interconnection to the ILECs networks without regulatory
intervention. SBC has signed commercial agreements with several
CLECs. SBC expects these contracts will result in a slight
incremental increase in its total revenue versus the previously
mandated UNE-P rates.
In August 2004, the FCC released interim rules that continue
nationwide unbundling of SBCs traditional network through
at least the end of February 2005. As a result, certain ILECs
asked the D.C. Circuit to enforce its March 2004 order
vacating those very same rules. Based upon the FCCs
response that it would issue new rules by the end of the year,
the D.C. Circuit asked for a report on January 4, 2005.
In December 2004, the FCC adopted a new fourth set of rules for
unbundling requirements to comply with the
D.C. Circuits decision, which provide some
significant relief from unbundling for mass market customers. In
other respects, however, SBC believes that the FCCs
revised rules fail to fully comply with the
D.C. Circuits decision; for example, the FCC retained
unbundling requirements for many of SBCs high-capacity
loop and transport facilities. The revised rules include a one
dollar increase in the current rates for existing UNE-P, which
would remain in effect through a transition period
(12 months from the effective date of the order). Because
the FCC did not release its written order containing these
revised rules until February 4, 2005, SBC has not yet been
able to fully evaluate the impact of these new rules on its
financial position or results of operations. However, SBC
believes that the FCCs revised rules do not accurately and
fully address the concerns raised by the D.C. Circuit in
its March 2004 order; therefore, SBC (together with several
other parties) filed a petition challenging the revised rules
with the D.C. Circuit on February 14, 2005, asking the
court to order the FCC to adopt rules that are consistent with
the courts decision.
In October 2004, the FCC approved three orders regarding the
unbundling rules applicable to broadband. Each of the orders
favorably limits SBCs unbundling obligations. The FCC
limited SBCs obligation to unbundle fiber facilities to
multiple dwelling units, such as apartment buildings. The FCC
also limited SBCs unbundling obligations as to fiber
facilities deployed in fiber-to-the curb arrangements. Finally,
the FCC rejected CLEC arguments that these fiber facilities
should be unbundled under another statutory provision. These
orders have added some clarity to the applicable rules and
enabled SBC to announce its intent to accelerate its planned
deployment of an advanced fiber network.
It is unclear how state PUCs will respond to these new FCC
rules. SBCs ability to implement the
D.C. Circuits decision and to negotiate private
commercial agreements has been constrained because many CLECs
are hopeful that some state PUCs nevertheless will attempt to
require that all network elements continue to be unbundled under
state law. SBC believes that the D.C. Circuits ruling
in March 2004 precludes the states from determining which
network elements must be unbundled. Continued unfavorable
regulations imposed at the state level could cause SBC to
experience additional declines in access line revenues and could
reduce its invested capital and employment levels related to
those services.
It is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings by
the FCC, state PUCs and the courts or the FCCs and the
state PUCs future rule-making activities. Any adverse
decisions by the courts, the FCC or the state PUCs could have a
materially adverse effect on the operations of SBC.
21
SBC may not be aware of certain foreign government
regulations.
Because regulatory schemes vary by country, SBC may be subject
to, but presently unaware of, regulations in foreign countries
in which SBC or AT&T has assets or otherwise does business.
If that were the case, SBC could be subject to sanctions by a
foreign government that could materially adversely affect its
ability to operate in that country. We cannot assure you that
any current regulatory approvals held by SBC or AT&T are, or
will remain, sufficient in the view of foreign regulatory
authorities, or that any additional necessary approvals will be
granted on a timely basis or at all, in all jurisdictions in
which SBC wishes to operate following the merger, or that
applicable restrictions in those jurisdictions will not be
unduly burdensome. The failure to obtain the authorizations
necessary to operate internationally could have a material
adverse effect on SBCs ability to generate revenue and its
overall competitive position following the merger.
Resales of SBC common stock following the merger and
additional obligations to issue common stock may cause the
market price of that stock to fall.
As of February 28, 2005, SBC had 3,303,437,610 shares
of common stock outstanding and approximately 214 million
shares subject to outstanding options and other rights to
purchase or acquire its shares. SBC currently expects that it
will issue a maximum of
[l] shares of SBC common
stock in connection with the merger. The issuance of these new
shares and the sale of additional shares of SBC common stock
that may become eligible for sale in the public market from time
to time upon exercise of options, including a substantial number
of SBC options that will be replacing existing AT&T options,
could have the effect of depressing the market price for SBC
common stock.
The trading price of SBC common stock may be affected by
factors different from those affecting the price of AT&T
common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, holders of AT&T common stock
will become holders of SBC common stock. SBCs business
differs from that of AT&T and, accordingly, the results of
operations of SBC, as well as the trading price of SBC common
stock, after the merger may be affected by factors different
from those currently affecting AT&Ts results of
operations and the price of AT&T common stock. For a
discussion of the businesses of AT&T and SBC and of certain
factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see the
documents incorporated by reference in this document and
referred to under Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 144.
Cingular could fail to achieve, in the amounts and within
the timeframe expected, the capital and expense synergies and
other benefits expected from its acquisition of AT&T
Wireless.
In October 2004, Cingular Wireless LLC, SBCs wireless
joint venture with BellSouth, acquired AT&T Wireless
Services, Inc. for approximately $41 billion in cash. SBC
and BellSouth funded, by means of an equity contribution to
Cingular, a significant portion of the purchase price, and
SBCs share, based on its 60% equity ownership of
Cingular, was approximately $21.6 billion.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of the Cingular/ AT&T
Wireless merger will depend in part upon meeting some of the
same challenges that the proposed SBC/ AT&T merger will
face. See Risk Factors Relating to SBC
Following the Merger SBC may fail to realize the
anticipated synergies, cost savings and other benefits expected
from the merger, which could adversely affect the value of SBC
common stock after the merger. There can be no assurance
that such challenges will be met. Delays encountered in the
transition process could have a material adverse effect upon the
revenues, expenses, operating results and financial condition of
the new Cingular. In addition, if the Cingular/ AT&T
Wireless merger fails to achieve, in the amount and within the
timeframe expected, the capital and expense synergies and other
benefits expected, there will be an adverse impact on
Cingulars operating results, which will adversely affect
the financial results of SBC following the SBC/ AT&T merger.
22
Cingular faces substantial competition in all aspect of
its business as competition continues to increase in the
wireless communications industry.
Under current FCC rules, six or more PCS licensees, two cellular
licensees and one or more enhanced specialized mobile radio
licensees may operate in each of Cingulars service areas.
On average, Cingular has four to five other wireless competitors
in each of its service areas and competes for customers based
principally on price, service offerings, call quality, coverage
area and customer service.
Cingulars competitors are principally four national
(Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile, and Sprint PCS and Nextel
Communications (the latter two have recently announced an
agreement to merge)) and a larger number of regional providers
of cellular, PCS and other wireless communications services.
Cingular also competes with resellers and wireline service
providers. Moreover, Cingular may experience significant
competition from companies that provide similar services using
other communications technologies and services. While some of
these technologies and services are now operational, others are
being developed or may be developed in the future.
SBC expects that intense industry competition and market
saturation likely will cause the wireless industrys
customer growth rate to moderate in comparison with historical
growth rates. This competition will continue to put pressure on
pricing, margins and customer turnover as the carriers compete
for potential customers. The substantial competition Cingular is
facing could have a material adverse effect on its ability to
achieve revenue and profit growth, and this in turn could hurt
SBCs bottom line based on its 60% share in Cingulars
operating results.
Uncertainty in the U.S. securities markets and
adverse medical cost trends could cause SBCs pension and
postretirement costs to increase further following the
merger.
SBCs pension and postretirement cost have increased in the
recent years, primarily due to a continued increase in medical
and prescription drug costs. Investment returns of SBCs
pension funds depend largely on trends in the
U.S. securities markets and the U.S. economy in
general. In particular, uncertainty in the U.S. securities
markets and U.S. economy could result in investment returns
less than those previously assumed and a decline in the value of
plan assets used in pension and postretirement calculations,
which SBC will be required to recognize over the next several
years under generally accepted accounting principles. Should the
securities markets decline and medical and prescription drug
costs continue to increase significantly, SBC would expect to
face increasing annual combined net pension and postretirement
costs.
23
THE MERGER
Background of the Merger
Since the split-off of AT&T Wireless in 2001 and the
spin-off of AT&T Broadband in 2002, the AT&T board of
directors and AT&Ts management have periodically
examined AT&Ts strategic alternatives and have, on
occasion, explored the desirability of a potential business
combination of AT&T with a third party, including SBC. These
explorations included preliminary discussions with third parties
other than SBC, but the discussions with other third parties did
not result in any definitive combination proposals.
On two separate occasions during 2004, in July and again briefly
in November, members of AT&Ts senior management and
SBCs senior management held discussions concerning a
possible combination between the two companies, but on neither
occasion did the discussions progress beyond initial exchanges
of information and a preliminary exchange of views on
contractual issues. SBC indicated a potential willingness on
both occasions, as a conceptual matter, to pay a modest premium
for AT&T shares in connection with a transaction in which
SBC common stock would be the consideration, but did not
quantify the potential premium. A precise exchange ratio was
never proposed or discussed. In each instance, SBC determined to
terminate the discussions, and confidential documents that were
shared by the parties were either returned or destroyed. In the
first instance, SBC believed that there was too much uncertainty
regarding the future regulation of the telecommunications
industry given (1) the applications for certiorari then
pending in the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of the
FCCs order in the Trienniel Review Order (TRO)
proceeding (which had adopted new unbundling rules
for access that ILECs, including SBCs wireline
subsidiaries, must provide to CLECs), (2) the application
from certain ILECs then pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the D.C. Circuit for a writ of mandamus to require the FCC
to establish permanent rules with respect to unbundled network
element platform, or UNE-P, requirements (which also involve
access that incumbent local exchange carriers must provide to
competitive local exchange carriers) and (3) other FCC
rulemaking initiatives with respect to broadband deployment, for
SBC to proceed with further discussions with AT&T at that
time. SBC therefore determined that its management should focus
its attention at that time solely on completing Cingulars
acquisition of AT&T Wireless rather than consider additional
acquisitions.
Cingulars acquisition of AT&T Wireless closed on
October 26, 2004. In addition, by late October substantial
regulatory certainty with respect to a number of fundamental
matters had been obtained through a series of court and FCC
decisions. In particular, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the
applications for certiorari seeking review of the FCCs
order in the TRO proceeding and the U.S. Court of Appeals
decided to delay the issuance of a writ of mandamus until
January 2005, so as to allow the FCC time to establish
permanent rules with respect to UNE-P prior to its issuance. In
late October the FCC also issued a decision clarifying its rules
with respect to broadband deployment, thereby adding more
certainty with respect to SBCs ability to implement its
previously announced Project Lightspeed broadband initiative.
As a result of these events, SBC determined that it faced a
watershed point in the development of the telecommunications
industry and that it was an appropriate time to consider
strategic alternatives. Accordingly, at the SBC boards
November meeting, SBCs management discussed various
options for the SBC board to consider, including continuing on a
path of organic growth as well as the possibility of a
horizontal or vertical transaction. The SBC board decided to
pursue a possible transaction with AT&T. In late November,
following this decision by the SBC board, discussions between
SBC and AT&T were reopened briefly. In this instance, SBC
terminated the discussions because it determined that, given the
wide gap between the parties on a number of contractual issues,
including, among others, deal protections, the nature and extent
of representations and warranties to be given by each party, the
extent of each partys obligation to obtain regulatory
approval for the transaction, the definition of material
adverse effect and the conditions to closing, it did not
believe it would be fruitful to pursue further the possibility
of a combination.
In the course of a discussion regarding matters unrelated to a
potential merger in mid-January 2005, AT&Ts
general counsel and SBCs general counsel agreed that it
might be productive for AT&T to provide SBC with a revised
markup of a proposed merger agreement in an effort to address a
number of the contractual issues that had been troublesome to
SBC in November 2004. Thereafter, AT&Ts attorneys
24
provided such a revised markup to SBCs attorneys. Because
both SBC and AT&T continued to believe that a combination
could be beneficial to both parties, a new round of discussions
was commenced. From January 14 through 17, 2005,
AT&Ts attorneys and SBCs attorneys discussed
non-financial issues, with the emphasis on provisions regarding
mutual commitments to complete a transaction, conditions to
consummation of the transaction and other contractual issues. At
a regularly scheduled meeting on January 19, 2005, the
AT&T board of directors received an update on these
discussions and reviewed potential strategic alternatives,
including the possibilities of pursuing a merger with SBC,
pursuing a transaction with another third party and continuing
operations as a stand-alone company. The AT&T board
authorized further discussions with SBC because the AT&T
board believed that a combination with SBC could provide
significant operational synergies and other benefits and could
give AT&T shareholders an interest in a larger and more
diverse company than AT&T as a stand-alone company. While
AT&Ts management also discussed with the AT&T
board the possibility of transactions with other third parties,
these other transactions did not appear achievable in the near
term based on prior discussions with such parties and/or did not
appear to offer an equivalent level of synergies as compared to
the potential transaction with SBC.
Thereafter, AT&Ts management had further discussions
with SBCs management, both with respect to the potential
financial terms of a transaction and with respect to contractual
issues, including the no-shop provisions, the amount
of and triggers for a termination fee, the nature and extent of
representations and warranties to be given by each party, the
extent of each partys obligation to obtain regulatory
approvals for the transaction, the definition of material
adverse effect, the restrictions to be imposed on the
companies businesses between signing and closing and the
conditions to closing. In these discussions, SBCs
management continued to indicate SBCs willingness to offer
a modest premium to the current price of AT&Ts common
stock, but without specific quantification. On January 21,
2005, David Dorman, AT&Ts Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, met with Edward Whitacre, SBCs Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. In the course of this meeting,
Mr. Dorman and Mr. Whitacre had discussions with
respect to possible financial terms, including a potential
premium to AT&Ts market price, which for the first
time was quantified as being in a range of 10% to 15% based on
the then-current prices of the two companies shares. While
they did not reach any agreement on financial terms,
Mr. Dorman and Mr. Whitacre agreed that they would
like to continue discussions between the two companies.
The AT&T board of directors had a telephonic meeting on
January 23, 2005, and received an update on the
discussions. The AT&T board was informed that there had been
progress on the contractual discussions, particularly in
negotiating no-shop provisions consistent with the
boards fiduciary duties. The AT&T board was also
informed that, while there was no agreement on financial terms,
it appeared based on Mr. Dormans discussion with
Mr. Whitacre on January 21, 2005 that a premium in the
range of 10% to 15% to AT&Ts market price could be
achieved. The AT&T board authorized the continuation of its
managements discussions with SBCs management for the
purpose of determining whether an agreement could be reached on
acceptable financial terms.
During the week of January 24, 2005, AT&T entered into
a new confidentiality agreement with SBC, and AT&Ts
management continued its discussions with SBCs management.
AT&Ts management provided SBC with further information
with respect to AT&T and SBCs management provided
AT&T with additional information about SBC. Meetings and
exchanges of documents and other confidential information
between the managements of both companies took place, and
AT&Ts attorneys continued to discuss and negotiate the
draft merger agreement with SBCs attorneys. The parties
had already agreed to the transaction structure in which
AT&T would become a wholly owned subsidiary of SBC, which
reflected both the fact that SBC would be the acquiring company
and the fact this structure could be used to effect a tax-free
exchange of shares. The number of SBC shares to be exchanged for
each outstanding AT&T share remained to be negotiated by the
respective managements of the parties.
The two companies attorneys had extensive discussions
during this week with respect to deal protection
issues. In particular, SBCs attorneys sought to impose the
maximum level of restrictions permissible under law on
AT&Ts ability to have discussions with potential
third-party acquirers. AT&Ts attorneys insisted that
AT&T and its board have the right to consider unsolicited
proposals that might be submitted after the agreement with SBC
was executed where necessary for AT&Ts directors to
comply with
25
their fiduciary duties, and to provide information to and
negotiate with a third party that made a superior proposal,
subject to certain rights of SBC to match any such
superior proposal. The two companies attorneys agreed that
if Verizon Communications Inc. were to submit an unsolicited
proposal to acquire AT&T, in determining whether Verizon had
submitted a superior proposal, AT&T would not
consider Verizon more likely to obtain the regulatory approvals
required to consummate an acquisition of AT&T, or to obtain
those approvals more quickly, than would SBC (based on the
assumptions that there would have been no material change in the
business of Verizon or the information available to AT&T
with respect thereto from that which existed as of the date of
the merger agreement and that Verizon would not be willing to
assume materially greater contractual obligations or risk with
respect to obtaining regulatory approvals than SBC would assume
in the merger agreement). SBCs attorneys also sought to
give SBC the right to terminate the agreement and be paid a
termination fee by AT&T in the event that AT&T violated
its no-shop covenants. After extensive discussion of
this issue, AT&Ts attorneys agreed to recommend
accepting such a provision, but insisted that it be triggered
only if AT&T knowingly and materially and not
inadvertently breached these obligations. The
parties attorneys also discussed the size of the
termination fee, ultimately agreeing on a termination fee that
was, in percentage terms, consistent with comparable
transactions.
On Wednesday afternoon, January 26, 2005, rumors began to
circulate about merger discussions between AT&T and SBC,
which were reported in the press the next day. On the evening of
January 26, SBCs management proposed what it
considered to be final financial terms for the proposed
transaction at an exchange ratio of 0.7803 of a share of SBC
common stock for each outstanding share of AT&T common stock
and a special dividend to AT&Ts shareholders of $1.20
per share. Based on the closing market prices of the two
companies shares on January 26, 2005, this represented a
price per AT&T share of $20.38 and approximately a 10.5%
premium to AT&Ts share price (and approximately a
12.7% premium based on the closing market prices of the two
companies shares on January 21, 2005, the date of Mr.
Dormans meeting with Mr. Whitacre). This exchange ratio
and the amount of the cash dividend were selected by SBCs
management based on the premium and aggregate cash values that
they represented. Due to the press reports about the merger
discussions, however, on January 27, 2005, the market price
of AT&Ts shares began to rise and the market price of
SBCs shares began to fall. AT&Ts management told
SBCs management that AT&T could not agree at that time
to SBCs proposed financial terms, and suggested that they
have further discussions about the financial terms following the
close of market trading on Friday, January 28, 2005.
On Friday, January 28, 2005, SBCs board of directors
met to review the status of discussions with AT&T. At this
meeting, SBCs management again discussed the strategic
rationale for a proposed merger with AT&T, the terms of the
then-current draft merger agreement and the financial
implications of the transaction. Following that meeting, on
Friday evening, SBCs management again told AT&Ts
management that SBCs final financial proposal was an
exchange ratio of 0.7803 and a special dividend of $1.20 per
share. Based on the closing market price of SBCs shares
that day, this proposal represented a value of approximately
$19.63 per share, or an $0.08 per share discount to the closing
market price of $19.71 per AT&T share on that day.
AT&Ts management responded that the financial terms of
the transaction should provide AT&Ts shareholders with
a premium to the AT&T share price based on closing market
prices per share on January 28th, but SBCs management
reiterated that its proposal was final. Mr. Dorman then called
Mr. Whitacre and proposed an exchange ratio of 0.8044 plus
$1.20 per share in a special dividend, which would have had a
value of $20.20 per share based on the closing market price of
SBCs shares on that day, representing approximately a 2.5%
premium to the closing market price of $19.71 per AT&T
share. Mr. Whitacre responded that SBCs proposal on the
exchange ratio was its final proposal.
Following these conversations, AT&Ts senior management
consulted with representatives of CSFB and Morgan Stanley,
AT&Ts financial advisors, on how to respond.
Thereafter, AT&Ts management told SBCs
management that, if the merger agreement could be executed
before the opening of the financial markets on Monday,
January 31, 2005, AT&Ts management would
recommend to the AT&T board of directors that it approve a
transaction with a value to AT&Ts shareholders, based
on the January 28, 2005 closing market prices for the two
companies shares, equal to AT&Ts $19.71 per
share closing market price on that day. SBCs management
said that it would agree, if $0.10 per share of that value could
be shifted from the SBC stock consideration to the special
dividend to be paid by AT&T (i.e., increasing the
special dividend to $1.30
26
per share and adjusting the exchange ratio to 0.77942 to produce
a total value, based on the January 28, 2005 closing market
prices, of $19.71 per AT&T share). Following further
discussions, the managements of the two companies agreed to
recommend the transaction to their respective boards of
directors with an exchange ratio of 0.77942 of an SBC share for
each AT&T share and a special cash dividend of $1.30 per
AT&T share. While this represented a value of $19.71 per
AT&T share based on the closing market price of SBCs
shares on January 28, 2005, it represented a value of
approximately $20.46 per AT&T share based on the closing
market price of SBC shares on Friday, January 21, 2005 (the
day on which Mr. Dorman and Mr. Whitacre discussed a
potential premium range of 10% to 15%), or approximately a 13.2%
premium to the closing market price of $18.08 per AT&T share
on that day.
On January 29 and 30, 2005, AT&Ts attorneys and
SBCs attorneys finalized the proposed merger agreement,
including these financial terms.
The AT&T board of directors met on January 30, 2005,
and reviewed the proposed transaction. At that meeting,
AT&Ts management and financial advisors reviewed the
terms and financial implications of the transaction and
AT&Ts financial advisors rendered their respective
opinions with respect to the fairness from a financial point of
view of the exchange ratio or consideration, as applicable, to
be received by the holders of shares of AT&T common stock in
the merger, which opinions are summarized under the caption
The Merger Opinions of AT&Ts
Financial Advisors. In addition, AT&Ts attorneys
reviewed the terms of the proposed merger agreement with the
AT&T board, and AT&Ts management provided their
views and recommendation of the transaction. Following extended
discussion and review of the proposed transaction and
AT&Ts strategic alternatives, the AT&T board of
directors, by a vote of nine to one, approved the merger
agreement.
The corporate development committee of the SBC board of
directors met in the early afternoon of January 30, 2005 to
consider the proposed transaction. The SBC board of directors
met later in the afternoon on the same day and also reviewed the
proposed transaction. At each meeting, SBCs management and
Lehman Brothers Inc., Evercore Partners Inc. and Rohatyn
Associates, LLC, SBCs financial advisors, reviewed the
terms and financial implications of the transaction. In
addition, SBCs counsel reviewed the terms of the proposed
merger agreement. Following extended discussion and review of
the proposed transaction, the corporate development committee of
the SBC board of directors unanimously determined to recommend
to the SBC board of directors that it approve the merger
agreement. Thereafter, after further discussion and review of
the proposed transaction at the meeting of the SBC board of
directors, the members of the SBC board of directors who were
present at the meeting unanimously approved the merger agreement
and declared its advisability.
Immediately after the meetings of the boards of directors of SBC
and AT&T, SBC, AT&T and Merger Sub executed the merger
agreement.
SBCs Reasons for the Merger
At its meeting on January 30, 2005, following detailed
presentations by SBCs management and discussions with
outside advisors, the members of the SBC board of directors
present in person or by telephone at the meeting unanimously
approved the merger agreement with AT&T and declared its
advisability. In the course of making its decision to approve
the merger agreement, the SBC board of directors consulted with
SBCs management, as well as its outside legal counsel and
its financial advisors. The SBC board of directors considered,
among other things, the following material factors at its
January 30, 2005 meeting and certain prior meetings
referred to above:
Strategic Fit. The SBC board of directors considered that
the combination of SBC and AT&T would create one of the
nations leading communications companies with significant
national and global reach. The transaction would combine
AT&Ts global network capabilities, business and
government customers and fast-growing Internet protocol
(IP)-based business with SBCs strong local exchange,
high-speed broadband and nationwide wireless coverage and
solutions.
27
In particular, the SBC board of directors considered that:
|
|
|
|
|
The combined company would enjoy the benefits of AT&Ts
world-class assets and industry-leading capabilities, including |
|
|
|
|
|
a state-of-the-art nationwide and global communications network; |
|
|
|
advanced technological capabilities in data and IP-based
services; |
|
|
|
proven sales and service expertise for complex communications
solutions; and |
|
|
|
significant product and service development capabilities in
AT&T Labs; |
|
|
|
|
|
The merger would combine SBCs broad consumer and business
customer base with AT&Ts high-end enterprise and
government customer base; and |
|
|
|
The combined company would have a strong, diversified set of
product and service offerings, including multi-feature
integrated communications and business and consumer
voice-over-internet (VoIP). |
Cost Savings and Revenue Synergies. The SBC board of
directors considered that the integration of AT&T into SBC
would create substantial potential cost savings and revenue
synergies, which were estimated by SBC to yield a present value
of more than $15 billion in identified synergies, net of
costs to achieve them. SBCs management expected that
approximately 85 to 90 percent of the synergies would come
from reduced costs in areas such as network operations,
headquarters, staff functions, customer account services,
information technology and procurement, and that the synergies
were expected to result in an increase, based on various
assumptions, in annual earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization of $2 billion or more by 2008.
Almost all of the synergies were expected to come from reduced
costs over and above expected cost reductions from SBCs
and AT&Ts existing stand-alone productivity
initiatives. The synergies (excluding integration costs) were
expected to be achieved following the merger from the following
areas, in the approximate amounts indicated for 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
network operations and IT, as facilities and operations would be
consolidated ($900 million to $1 billion); |
|
|
|
|
|
sales and support functions of the business services
organizations would be combined ($500 million to
$600 million); |
|
|
|
|
|
duplicate corporate functions would be eliminated
($400 million to $500 million); and |
|
|
|
|
|
revenues would be enhanced, as SBC would migrate existing
service offerings to new customer segments ($100 million to
$200 million). |
|
You should understand that the foregoing statements about
estimated potential synergies are forward-looking statements
subject to the risks and uncertainties described at
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking
Statements. These estimates of synergies are based on
numerous estimates, assumptions and judgments and are subject to
significant uncertainties. SBC cannot assure you that any
particular amount of synergies will be realized by SBC following
the merger or assure you of the time frame in which they will be
achieved. See also Risk Factors Risk
Factors Relating to SBC Following the
Merger SBC may fail to realize the anticipated
cost savings, revenues, enhancements and other benefits expected
from the merger, which could adversely affect the value of SBC
common stock after the merger above.
Technological Strength. The SBC board of directors
considered that SBC following the merger would have the
resources and skill sets to innovate and more quickly deliver to
customers the next generation of advanced, integrated IP-based
wireline and wireless communications services. SBC would expect
to bring a full range of innovative voice and data services to
customers around the world, using AT&Ts assets, which
include an advanced product portfolio including a broad range of
IP-based services, as well as AT&T Labs, a leading
communications research organization.
28
Additional Considerations. In the course of reaching its
decision to approve the merger agreement, the SBC board of
directors considered the following additional factors as
generally supporting its decision:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange ratio of 0.77942 of a share of SBC common stock for
each share of AT&T common stock, the fact that the exchange
ratio is fixed, and the resulting percentage ownership interests
and voting power that current SBC stockholders would have in SBC
following the merger; |
|
|
|
the other financial terms of the transaction, including the
special dividend of $1.30 in cash per share of AT&T common
stock to be paid in connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including the
conditions to the completion of the merger; the circumstances
under which the merger agreement could be terminated and the
impact of such a termination; and the potential payment by
AT&T of a termination fee of $560 million (plus up to
$40 million in expenses); |
|
|
|
|
historical information concerning SBCs and AT&Ts
respective businesses, financial condition, results of
operations, earnings, technology positions, managements,
competitive positions and prospects on a stand-alone basis and
forecasted combined basis, which indicated that combining SBC
and AT&T would be beneficial to stockholders of the combined
company because the combined company would be better positioned
to be successful over the long term than either company would be
on a stand-alone basis; |
|
|
|
|
|
current financial market conditions, including relative
valuations of telecommunications companies and credit market
considerations, which were generally perceived as favorable in
the context of making a sizable acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of the merger on the customers of SBC, which was
anticipated to be positive because of the broader service
offerings that are expected to be available from the combined
company; |
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of the merger on the employees of SBC, which was
generally anticipated to be positive because of the broader
opportunities that would be available to the employees in the
combined company; |
|
|
|
|
the regulatory consents required to consummate the merger and
the belief of SBCs management that the merger would be
approved by the requisite authorities, without the imposition of
conditions sufficiently material to preclude the merger, and
would otherwise be consummated in accordance with the terms of
the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
the expectation that the merger could be completed within a
reasonable time frame. |
The SBC board of directors also considered a number of
potentially negative factors in its deliberations concerning the
merger agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that, because the exchange ratio under the merger
agreement would not be adjusted for changes in the market price
of SBC common stock or AT&T common stock, the per share
value of the consideration to be paid to AT&T stockholders
on consummation of the merger could be significantly more than
the per share value of the consideration immediately prior to
the announcement of the proposed merger; |
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not receive all necessary
regulatory approvals, or that any governmental authorities could
attempt to condition their approval of the merger or of the
transfer of licenses or other entitlements on the
companies compliance with certain conditions, including
the divestiture of assets; |
|
|
|
the difficulties and management challenges inherent in
completing the merger and integrating the businesses, operations
and workforce of AT&T with those of SBC; |
|
|
|
the possibility of encountering difficulties in achieving
expected cost savings and revenue synergies in the amounts
currently estimated or in the time frames currently contemplated
by SBCs management; |
|
|
|
the risk that AT&Ts financial performance may not meet
SBCs expectations; |
29
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not be consummated and the
possible adverse implications for customers, investor relations
and employee morale under such circumstances; and |
|
|
|
the possibility that the effort required to plan for the
integration of AT&T into SBC and to complete the regulatory
approval process might adversely affect the ability of SBC to
meet its existing business performance targets. |
The SBC board of directors also reviewed numerous third party
analyses and newspaper articles regarding AT&Ts
business prospects and financial condition.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors that the
SBC board of directors considered is not intended to be
exhaustive, but is meant to include the material factors that
the SBC board of directors considered. In view of the complexity
and wide variety of factors, both positive and negative, that
the SBC board of directors considered, the SBC board of
directors did not find it practical to, and did not attempt to,
quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative or specific weights
or values to any of the factors considered. In addition,
individual members of the SBC board of directors may have given
different weights to different factors.
In considering the various factors, individual members of the
SBC board of directors considered all of these factors as a
whole, and concluded that, on balance, the positive factors
outweighed the negative factors and that they supported a
determination to approve the merger agreement and declare its
advisability.
AT&Ts Reasons for the Merger
At its meeting on January 30, 2005, the AT&T board of
directors, after due consideration and by a vote of nine to one:
|
|
|
|
|
declared that the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, including the special dividend, are
advisable; |
|
|
|
adopted the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
recommended that the holders of AT&T common stock adopt the
merger agreement. |
In adopting the merger agreement and making these declarations
and recommendation, the AT&T board of directors consulted
with AT&T senior management and AT&Ts financial
and legal advisors and considered a number of factors, including
those set forth below.
The AT&T board of directors considered the following factors
as generally supporting its decision to enter into the merger
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
its understanding of AT&Ts business, operations,
financial condition, earnings and prospects on a stand-alone
basis, in light of relevant factors, including the recent
redefinition of AT&Ts business model to move away from
actively competing for traditional consumer services to focus on
enterprise customers; |
|
|
|
its understanding of SBCs business, operations, financial
condition, earnings and prospects on a stand-alone basis and
forecasted combined basis; |
|
|
|
its understanding of the current and prospective business
environment in which AT&T and SBC operate, including
international, national and local economic conditions, the
competitive and regulatory environment for telecommunications
service providers generally, the technological trends in the
telecommunications industry, and the likely effect of these
factors on the combined company or, in the alternative, on
AT&T on a stand-alone basis; |
30
|
|
|
|
|
the anticipated strategic fit between SBC and AT&T, which
the AT&T board of directors believed will provide the
combined company with significantly greater capabilities than
either company has, or could develop, on its own, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
the complementary nature of the combined companys
networks, bringing together AT&Ts global and national
internet protocol (IP)-based networks with SBCs strong
local access, broadband access and wireless networks; |
|
|
|
the complementary nature of AT&Ts established, large
business customers and SBCs consumer and small business
customers; |
|
|
|
the combined companys highly diversified revenue sources,
including local, long distance, wireless, data and
directories; and |
|
|
|
the opportunity to combine AT&Ts technological
innovation resources, including AT&T Laboratories, with the
financial resources of SBC, including its investment grade
credit rating, which could allow the combined company to deliver
the next generation of advanced, integrated IP-based wireline
and wireless communications services more quickly to customers; |
|
|
|
|
|
the significant synergies that the AT&T board of directors
believed could result from the transaction, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
anticipated cost reductions in the following areas: network
operations and information technology, business service
organizations and the elimination of duplicate corporate
functions; and |
|
|
|
potential annual revenue synergies, as the combined company
rolls out expanded product offerings to new customer segments; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the financial terms of the transaction, including the relative
historical trading prices of AT&T common stock and SBC
common stock, the fixed exchange ratio of 0.77942 of a share of
SBC common stock for each share of AT&T common stock and the
special dividend of $1.30 in cash per share of AT&T common
stock to be paid in connection with the merger, in particular,
the AT&T board of directors noted that the exchange ratio
and special dividend offered a premium to AT&T shareholders
based on the trading prices of the companies common stock
prior to market rumors with respect to the merger discussions,
and that the stock consideration offered AT&T shareholders
the ability to become stockholders of SBC and participate in the
benefit of the significant synergies that the AT&T board of
directors believed could result from the transaction; |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, based on the closing price of SBC common stock on
January 28, 2005, the last trading day before the meeting
of the AT&T board of directors, the per share merger
consideration, together with the special dividend of $1.30 in
cash per share to be received in the merger by holders of
AT&T common stock was valued at $19.71, the equivalent of
the closing price of AT&T common stock on that same date and
representing a premium of 6.8% over the closing price of
AT&T common stock on January 26, 2005 (the last trading
day before rumors of the proposed transaction began to affect
the price and trading volumes of AT&T common stock) and
premiums of 5.4%, 5.2%, 6.1%, 17.7% and 14.6%, respectively,
over the average closing share price during the 10-day, 1-month,
3-month, 6-month and 1-year periods ended January 28, 2005,
respectively; |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, based on the closing price of SBC common stock on
January 28, 2005, the fixed exchange ratio of 0.77942 of a
share of SBC common stock for each share of AT&T common
stock, together with the special dividend of $1.30 in cash per
share to be received in the merger by holders of AT&T common
stock, represented a total effective exchange ratio of 0.834,
representing a premium of 11.2% over the closing price of
AT&T common stock on January 26, 2005 and premiums of
8.9%, 10.6%, 14.3%, 28.0% and 21.7%, respectively, over the
average closing share price during the 10-day, 1-month, 3-month,
6-month and 1-year periods ended January 28, 2005,
respectively; |
|
|
|
|
the financial analyses of CSFB and Morgan Stanley,
AT&Ts financial advisors, and the oral and written
opinions dated January 30, 2005 of CSFB that, as of such
date and subject to the matters |
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
described in its opinion, the exchange ratio was fair, from a
financial point of view, to holders of AT&T common stock and
the oral and written opinions dated January 30, 2005 of
Morgan Stanley that, as of such date and subject to the matters
and assumptions stated therein, the consideration to be received
by holders of AT&T common stock in accordance with the
merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such
holders other than SBC and its affiliates (each opinion is
discussed further below under Opinions of
AT&Ts Financial Advisors); |
|
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the merger would be accretive to the pro
forma earnings per share of SBC by 2008, as discussed below
under Opinions of AT&Ts Financial
Advisors Other Considerations; |
|
|
|
|
the expectation that, based on the current annual dividends paid
by AT&T and SBC, the pro forma dividend per share would
represent a 5.8% premium over the current AT&T dividend per
share paid to holders of AT&T common stock; |
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including the
nature of the parties representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements; in particular, the AT&T board
believed, after reviewing the merger agreement with its legal
advisors, that the merger agreement offered AT&T reasonable
assurances as to the likelihood of consummation of the
transaction, did not contain unusual conditions or other
provisions, and did not impose unreasonable burdens on AT&T; |
|
|
|
|
the proposed board and management arrangements of the combined
company, under which the current Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of AT&T will become President of the combined
company and be elected to the SBC board of directors and two
other AT&T directors will join an enlarged SBC board of
directors, which the AT&T board of directors believed would
help position the combined company with strong and experienced
leadership; |
|
|
|
the retention bonus arrangements for management to be
implemented in connection with the merger, which the AT&T
board of directors believed would help assure the continuity of
management, the likelihood of a successful integration and the
successful operation of the combined company; |
|
|
|
|
information available to the AT&T board of directors
concerning other strategic alternatives as described above under
Background of the Merger; |
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the merger would qualify as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes and
that, as a result, the exchange of their AT&T common stock
for SBC common stock in the merger would be tax-free to holders
of AT&T common stock; |
|
|
|
the required regulatory consents and the belief that the merger
would be approved by the requisite authorities, without the
imposition of conditions sufficiently material to preclude the
merger, and would otherwise be completed in accordance with the
terms of the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
the expectation that the merger could be completed by the first
half of 2006. |
The AT&T board of directors considered the following factors
generally weighing against a decision to enter into the merger
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulties and management challenges inherent in
completing a merger and integrating the businesses, operations
and workforce of AT&T with those of SBC; |
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits of the merger, including
the expected synergies, might not be fully achieved; |
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not be consummated and the
possible adverse implications to customers, investor relations
and employee morale under such circumstances; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that, although AT&T has the right under limited
conditions to consider and participate in discussions and
negotiations with respect to alternative acquisition proposals,
the provisions of the merger agreement relating to the potential
payment of a termination fee of $560 million (plus up to
$40 million in expenses) to SBC may have the effect of
discouraging such proposals. See Risk |
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
Factors Risks Relating to the Merger The
merger agreement restricts AT&Ts ability to pursue
alternatives to the merger. |
The AT&T board of directors also considered that the fixed
exchange ratio would not adjust upwards to compensate for
declines, or downwards to compensate for increases, in the price
of SBC common stock prior to the closing of the merger, and that
the terms of the merger agreement did not include termination
rights triggered expressly by a decrease in the value of the
merger consideration implied by the market price of SBC common
stock. The AT&T board of directors determined that this
structure was appropriate and the risk acceptable in view of:
the AT&T board of directors focus on the relative
intrinsic values and financial performance of SBC and AT&T
and the percentage of the combined company to be owned by former
holders of AT&T common stock; the inclusion in the merger
agreement of other structural protections such as the ability to
terminate the merger agreement in the event of a material
adverse effect on the financial condition, assets, liabilities,
business or results of operations of SBC; and AT&Ts
ability, under the limited circumstances specified in the merger
agreement, to consider and participate in discussions and
negotiations with respect to alternative acquisition proposals.
The AT&T board of directors also considered the retention
and employment arrangements with key AT&T employees and the
fact that some of AT&Ts executive officers and
directors have interests in the merger and have arrangements
that are different from, or in addition to, those of
AT&Ts shareholders generally.
The AT&T board of directors considered all of the foregoing
factors as a whole and, on balance, concluded that they
supported a favorable determination to approve the merger and
declare its advisability.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the AT&T board of directors is not exhaustive,
but includes all the material factors considered by the AT&T
board of directors. In view of the variety of factors considered
by the AT&T board of directors in connection with its
evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters,
the AT&T board of directors did not consider it practicable
to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign
relative or specific weight or values to any of these factors.
In addition, individual directors may have given different
weights to different factors.
One director, Donald F. McHenry, voted not to approve the
transaction. Mr. McHenry has advised that he voted not to
approve the transaction because he believed that the AT&T
board of directors direction to management as to
negotiation of price of the proposed transaction had not been
followed, specifically that management should have communicated
with the board more promptly than occurred regarding
managements discussions with SBC management during the
week of January 23rd. Mr. McHenry has advised, however, now
that the transaction has been approved by the AT&T board of
directors, and a merger agreement entered into by the parties,
and considering the potential consequences to AT&T
shareholders of not proceeding with the merger, that he joins
the other directors in recommending that shareholders vote to
approve the merger agreement. The AT&T board of directors,
other than Mr. McHenry, does not agree that management did
not follow a board direction.
Recommendation of the AT&T Board of Directors
After careful consideration, the AT&T board of directors
declared that the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, including the special dividend, are
advisable and adopted the merger agreement. THE AT&T
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE HOLDERS OF AT&T
COMMON STOCK VOTE FOR ADOPTION OF THE MERGER
AGREEMENT.
Certain AT&T Projections
Although AT&T periodically issues guidance concerning its
financial performance, AT&T as a matter of course does not
publicly disclose detailed forecasts or internal projections as
to its future revenues, earnings or financial condition.
However, as discussed under Background of the
Merger, in the course of their discussions in connection
with the merger, AT&Ts management provided SBC with
certain information with respect to its business which SBC and
AT&T believe was not publicly available. Such information
included the projections with respect to AT&T set forth
below. See Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page 143.
33
AT&T Projected Summary Financial Overview
($ in billions; except for per share amounts; all projected
numbers are approximate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
% Margin
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
EBITDA less capital expenditures
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Projected reconciliation of EBITDA to net income for the year
ending 12/31/2005
($ in billions; all projected numbers are approximate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA Margin
|
|
|
20.4 |
% |
EBITDA
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal Operating Income (EBIT)
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other net expenses*
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
* |
Other net expenses include interest expense, other income
(expense), and provision for income taxes. |
Projected reconciliation of EBITDA, less capital expenditures
to cash provided by operating activities
for the year ending 12/31/2005
($ in billions; all projected numbers are approximate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA less capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
Add capital expenditures
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cash expenses**
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
Changes in working capital and other operating assets &
liabilities
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
Other cash expenses primarily include taxes and interest expense. |
Information on EBITDA, related margins and EBITDA less capital
expenditures has been provided because these measures are
commonly used for evaluation purposes. EBITDA and EBITDA less
capital expenditures should be considered in addition to, but
not in lieu of, other measures of liquidity, profitability and
cash flows reported in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Additionally, these measures may not be
comparable to similarly captioned measures reported by other
companies.
While the projections set forth above were prepared in good
faith by AT&Ts management, no assurance can be made
regarding future events. Therefore, such projections cannot be
considered a reliable predictor of future operating results, and
this information should not be relied on as such. The
information in this section was not prepared with a view toward
public disclosure or with a view toward complying with the
guidelines
34
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants with respect to prospective financial information,
published guidelines of the SEC regarding forward-looking
statements, or U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. This information is not historical fact and should
not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future
results, and readers of this document are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on this information.
The prospective financial information (projections or forecasts)
of AT&T included in this document has been prepared by, and
is the responsibility of, AT&Ts management.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has neither examined nor compiled the
accompanying prospective financial information of AT&T and,
accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an
opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP report incorporated by reference in
this document relates to AT&Ts historical financial
information. It does not extend to the prospective financial
information and should not be read to do so.
The estimates and assumptions underlying the projections involve
judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic,
competitive, regulatory and financial market conditions and
future business decisions which may not be realized and are
inherently subject to significant business, economic,
competitive and regulatory uncertainties, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of
AT&T and will be beyond the control of combined company
after the merger. In addition, the projections were prepared
with a view of AT&T on a stand-alone basis, and without
reference to transaction-related costs. Accordingly, there can
be no assurance that the projected results would be realized or
that actual results would not differ materially from those
presented in the prospective financial information. See
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements beginning on page 143. These projections
are not included in this document in order to induce any
shareholder to vote in favor of adoption of the merger agreement
or to impact any investment decision with respect to shares of
AT&T or SBC common stock.
AT&T DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THESE
PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING SINCE THEIR
PREPARATION OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS
EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS
ARE SHOWN TO BE IN ERROR. FURTHERMORE, AT&T DOES NOT INTEND
TO UPDATE OR REVISE THESE PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CHANGES IN
GENERAL ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRY CONDITIONS.
Opinions of AT&Ts Financial Advisors
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC Fairness Opinion |
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC has acted as AT&Ts
financial advisor in connection with the merger. In connection
with CSFBs engagement, the AT&T board of directors
requested that CSFB render an opinion with respect to the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to holders of shares
of AT&T common stock, of the exchange ratio. At the meeting
of the AT&T board of directors on January 30, 2005,
CSFB rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed
in writing dated as of the same date, that, based upon and
subject to the matters described in its opinion, the exchange
ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders
of shares of AT&T common stock. For purposes of its analyses
CSFB assumed that AT&T will declare a $1.30 special cash
dividend per share of AT&T common stock payable to the
holders of AT&T common stock as of immediately prior to the
consummation of the merger.
The full text of CSFBs opinion, dated January 30,
2005, which sets forth, among other things, the procedures
followed, matters considered and limitations of the review
undertaken in connection with its opinion, is attached as Annex
B to this document and is incorporated herein by reference. The
summary of CSFBs fairness opinion set forth in this
document is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full
text of the opinion. Shareholders should read the opinion
carefully and in its entirety. CSFBs opinion is directed
to the board of directors of AT&T, addresses only the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to holders of AT&T
common stock of the exchange ratio and does not address any
other aspect or implication of the merger or any other
agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in
connection with the merger or
35
otherwise. CSFBs opinion does not constitute a
recommendation to any shareholder of AT&T as to how such
shareholder should vote or act with respect to any matter
relating to the proposed merger.
In arriving at its opinion, CSFB, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement and certain publicly available
business and financial information relating to AT&T and SBC; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain other information relating to AT&T and SBC,
including financial forecasts for 2005 prepared and provided to
CSFB by AT&T, financial forecasts for 2005 through 2007
prepared and provided to CSFB by SBC and certain publicly
available research analyst estimates concerning AT&T and SBC; |
|
|
|
met with the managements of AT&T and SBC to discuss the
business and prospects of AT&T and SBC, respectively; |
|
|
|
considered certain financial and stock market data of AT&T
and SBC, and it compared that data with similar data for other
publicly held companies in businesses it deemed similar to those
of AT&T and SBC; |
|
|
|
|
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial
terms of certain other business combinations and other
transactions which had been recently effected or announced; and |
|
|
|
|
considered such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
which it deemed relevant. |
In connection with CSFBs review, it did not assume any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
information that it reviewed or considered and relied on its
being complete and accurate in all material respects. With
respect to the financial forecasts of AT&T for 2005 prepared
by the management of AT&T, CSFB discussed such forecasts
with the management of AT&T, and CSFB was advised by them,
and CSFB assumed, that such forecasts represented the best
currently available estimates and judgments of the management of
AT&T as to the future financial performance of AT&T.
With respect to the publicly available research analyst
estimates concerning AT&T for 2006 through 2009 that CSFB
reviewed and discussed with AT&T, the management of AT&T
advised CSFB, and CSFB assumed, that such estimates represented
reasonable estimates and judgments as to the future financial
performance of AT&T. With respect to the publicly available
research analyst estimates concerning SBC for 2005 through 2007
reviewed by CSFB, CSFB, with the consent of the AT&T board
of directors and based upon its own comparison of such estimates
to financial forecasts for such years prepared by and discussed
with the management of SBC, assumed that such analyst estimates
represented reasonable estimates and judgments as to the future
financial performance of SBC. With respect to the estimates as
to the cost savings and other potential synergies anticipated to
result from the merger reviewed and discussed by the managements
of AT&T and SBC, CSFB was advised and assumed that such
estimates (including the aggregate amount, timing and
achievability thereof) represented reasonable estimates and
judgments. CSFB assumed, with the consent of the AT&T board
of directors, that the merger would be treated as a tax-free
reorganization for federal income tax purposes. CSFB also
assumed, with the consent of the AT&T board of directors,
that, in the course of obtaining any regulatory or third party
consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the merger,
no delay, limitation, restriction or condition would be imposed
that would have an adverse effect on AT&T, SBC or the
contemplated benefits of the merger and that the merger would be
consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement
without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term,
condition or agreement thereof. In addition, CSFB was not
requested to make, and did not make, an independent evaluation
or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or
otherwise) of AT&T or SBC, nor was CSFB furnished with any
such evaluations or appraisals. CSFBs opinion addressed
only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of AT&T common stock of the exchange ratio and did
not address any other aspect or implication of the merger or any
other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in
connection with the merger or otherwise. CSFBs opinion was
necessarily based upon information made available to it as of
January 30, 2005 and financial, economic, market and other
conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on such date.
CSFB did not express any opinion as to what the value of shares
of SBC common stock actually would be when
36
issued to the holders of AT&T common stock pursuant to the
merger or the prices at which shares of SBC common stock would
trade at any time. CSFBs opinion did not address the
relative merits of the merger as compared to alternative
transactions or strategies that may have been available to
AT&T, nor did it address the underlying business decision of
AT&T to proceed with the merger. No other limitations were
imposed on CSFB with respect to the investigations made or
procedures followed by CSFB in rendering its opinion. Although
CSFB evaluated the exchange ratio from a financial point of
view, CSFB was not requested to, and it did not, recommend the
specific consideration payable in the proposed merger, which
consideration was determined between AT&T and SBC.
On January 24, 2003, AT&T engaged CSFB to act as a
financial advisor based on its qualifications, experience,
reputation and knowledge of the business of AT&T. CSFB is an
internationally recognized investment banking firm and is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities
in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes. From
time to time, CSFB and its affiliates in the past have provided,
and in the future may provide, investment banking and other
financial services to AT&T and SBC, for which CSFB has
received, and would expect to receive, compensation. During the
past two years, CSFB has received approximately $20 million
in fees from AT&T as compensation for such services. CSFB is
a full service securities firm engaged in securities trading and
brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and
other financial services. In the ordinary course of business,
CSFB and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for their own
accounts and the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other
securities and financial instruments (including bank loans and
other obligations) of AT&T, SBC and any other company that
may be involved in the merger, as well as provide investment
banking and other financial services to such companies.
AT&T has agreed to pay CSFB a transaction fee based on 0.1%
of the aggregate value of the transaction, which will be
determined at closing. We currently project the transaction fee
at approximately $29 million (including a $2.5 million
incremental advisory fee). The transaction fee is payable in
three installments, one quarter upon signing, one quarter upon
receipt of shareholder approval and the unpaid balance upon
closing. AT&T has also agreed to reimburse CSFB for its fees
and expenses incurred in performing its services. In addition,
AT&T has agreed to indemnify CSFB and its affiliates, their
respective directors, officers, agents and employees and each
person, if any, controlling CSFB or any of its affiliates
against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain
liabilities under the federal securities laws, related to or
arising out of CSFBs engagement and any related
transactions.
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated Fairness
Opinion |
Pursuant to an engagement letter, on January 24, 2003,
AT&T retained Morgan Stanley to act as a financial advisor
to the board of directors of AT&T in connection with a
potential combination. AT&T selected Morgan Stanley to act
as its financial advisor based on its qualifications, expertise,
reputation and knowledge of the business of AT&T. At the
meeting of the AT&T board of directors on January 30,
2005, Morgan Stanley rendered its oral opinion, which was
subsequently confirmed in writing as of the same date, that,
based upon and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and
limitations set forth in its opinion, the merger consideration
to be received by the holders of shares of AT&T common stock
in accordance with the merger agreement was fair from a
financial point of view to such holders other than SBC and its
affiliates. In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed
that the special cash dividend was part of the merger
consideration.
The full text of Morgan Stanleys opinion, dated
January 30, 2005, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
qualifications and limitations of the reviews undertaken in
rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex C to this
document. The summary of Morgan Stanleys fairness opinion
set forth in this document is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion. You should read the
opinion carefully and in its entirety. Morgan Stanleys
opinion is directed to the board of directors of AT&T,
addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view of
the merger consideration to be received by holders of AT&T
common stock, other than SBC and its affiliates, in accordance
with the merger agreement, and does not address any other aspect
of the merger. Morgan Stanleys opinion does not constitute
a recommendation to any shareholder of AT&T as to how such
shareholder should vote with respect to the proposed merger.
37
In connection with rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other information of AT&T and of SBC; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning AT&T prepared by the
management of AT&T; |
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of AT&T with senior executives
of AT&T; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections for 2005 prepared by the
management of AT&T and reviewed certain public research
reports concerning AT&T prepared by certain equity research
analysts and discussed with senior executives of AT&T such
financial projections and research reports (including the
financial projections contained therein) and certain estimates,
prepared by the management of AT&T, as to the cost savings
and other potential synergies (including the amount, timing and
achievability thereof) anticipated to result from the merger; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning SBC prepared by the
management of SBC; |
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of SBC with senior executives of SBC; |
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections for 2005 through 2007
prepared by the management of SBC and reviewed certain public
research reports concerning SBC prepared by certain equity
research analysts; |
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for AT&T
common stock and SBC common stock; |
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of AT&T and of SBC and
the prices and trading activity of AT&T common stock and SBC
common stock with that of certain other comparable
publicly-traded companies and their securities; |
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions; |
|
|
|
discussed with the managements of AT&T and of SBC
information regarding certain strategic, financial and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the merger; |
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement and certain related documents; and |
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as Morgan Stanley deemed appropriate. |
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied
upon without independent verification the accuracy and
completeness of the information reviewed by it for the purposes
of its opinion. With respect to the financial projections of
AT&T for 2005 and the estimates of cost savings and
synergies prepared by the management of AT&T, Morgan Stanley
discussed such projections and estimates with the management of
AT&T and Morgan Stanley was advised by the management of
AT&T, and Morgan Stanley assumed, with the consent of the
AT&T board of directors, that such projections represented
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of AT&T as to the future financial performance of
AT&T. With respect to the financial projections concerning
AT&T contained in certain publicly available equity analyst
research reports (including adjustments thereto) that Morgan
Stanley discussed with AT&T, the management of AT&T
advised Morgan Stanley, and it assumed, with the consent of the
AT&T board of directors, that such projections represented
reasonable estimates and judgments as to the future financial
performance of AT&T. With respect to publicly available
research analyst estimates concerning SBC for 2005 through 2007,
based upon Morgan Stanleys comparison of such estimates to
financial forecasts of the management of SBC for such years and
discussions of such management forecasts with the management of
SBC, Morgan Stanley assumed that such analyst estimates
represented reasonable estimates and judgments as to the future
financial performance of SBC. Morgan Stanley also assumed, with
the consent of the AT&T board of directors, without
independent verification, that the information regarding certain
strategic, financial and operational benefits anticipated to
result from the merger represented reasonable estimates and
judgments of the managements of
38
AT&T and SBC. Morgan Stanley assumed, with the consent of
the AT&T board of directors, that the merger would be
consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the merger
agreement without material modification, waiver or delay,
including, among other things, that the merger would be treated
as a tax-free reorganization pursuant to the Code. In connection
with the receipt of all the necessary regulatory or other third
party approvals for the merger, Morgan Stanley assumed, with the
consent of the AT&T board of directors, that no restrictions
would be imposed that would have a material adverse effect on
the contemplated benefits expected to be derived in the merger.
Morgan Stanley did not make any independent valuation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities of AT&T or SBC nor
was Morgan Stanley furnished with any such valuations or
appraisals. Morgan Stanleys opinion was necessarily based
on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect
on, and the information made available to it as of,
January 30, 2005. Events occurring after such date could
materially affect Morgan Stanleys opinion. Morgan Stanley
has not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its
opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after
January 30, 2005. No other limitations were imposed on
Morgan Stanley with respect to the investigations made or
procedures followed by Morgan Stanley in rendering its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley was not authorized to
solicit, and it did not solicit, interest from any party with
respect to any acquisition, business combination or other
extraordinary transaction involving AT&T. Morgan
Stanleys opinion did not address the underlying business
decision by AT&T to enter into the merger agreement or the
relative merits of the merger compared to other alternatives
available to AT&T, or whether such alternatives existed.
Morgan Stanley did not recommend any specific merger
consideration to AT&T or that any specific merger
consideration constituted the only appropriate merger
consideration for the merger. In addition, Morgan Stanleys
opinion did not in any manner address the prices at which SBC
common stock would trade following the consummation of the
merger or at any other time.
Morgan Stanley is an internationally recognized investment
banking and advisory firm. Morgan Stanley, as part of its
investment banking business, is continuously engaged in the
valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive
biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate,
estate and other purposes. In the ordinary course of its
business, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may from time to
time trade in the securities or the indebtedness of AT&T,
SBC and their affiliates for its own account, the accounts of
investment funds and other clients under the management of
Morgan Stanley and for the accounts of its customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities or indebtedness for any such account. In the
past, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates have provided financial
advisory and financing services for both AT&T and SBC and
have received fees for the rendering of these services. During
the past two years, Morgan Stanley has received approximately
$10 million in fees from AT&T as compensation for such
services. In addition, in the future, Morgan Stanley may
provide, or seek to provide, financial advice and financing
services to the combined company.
AT&T has agreed to pay Morgan Stanley a transaction fee
based on 0.1% of the aggregate value of the transaction, which
will be determined at closing. We currently project the
transaction fee at approximately $24 million (which
reflects a $2.5 million credit). The transaction fee is
payable in three installments, one quarter upon signing, one
quarter upon receipt of shareholder approval and the unpaid
balance upon closing. AT&T has also agreed to reimburse
Morgan Stanley for its fees and expenses incurred in performing
its services. In addition, AT&T has agreed to indemnify
Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their respective directors,
officers, agents and employees and each person, if any,
controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against
certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities
under the federal securities laws, related to or arising out of
Morgan Stanleys engagement and any related transactions.
In preparing their respective opinions to the AT&T board of
directors, CSFB and Morgan Stanley performed a variety of
financial and comparative analyses, including those described
below. The summary of the analyses of CSFB and Morgan Stanley
described below is not a complete description of the analyses
underlying their opinions. The preparation of a fairness opinion
is a complex process involving various determinations as to the
most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and
the application of
39
those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a
fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description. In arriving at their respective
opinions, each of CSFB and Morgan Stanley made qualitative
judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis
and factor that it considered. Accordingly, CSFB and Morgan
Stanley believe that their analyses must be considered as a
whole and that selecting portions of their analyses and factors
or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without
considering all analyses and factors or the narrative
description of the analyses, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the processes underlying their analyses and
opinions.
In their analyses, CSFB and Morgan Stanley considered industry
performance, general business, economic, market and financial
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of AT&T and SBC. No company, transaction or business
used in CSFBs and Morgan Stanleys analyses as a
comparison is identical to AT&T, SBC or the proposed merger,
and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not
entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involved complex
considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating
characteristics and other factors that could affect the
acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies,
business segments or transactions analyzed. The estimates
contained in the analyses of CSFB and Morgan Stanley and the
ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are
not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of
future results or values, which may be significantly more or
less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In
addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or
securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold.
Accordingly, the analyses and estimates of CSFB and Morgan
Stanley are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
The opinions of CSFB and Morgan Stanley were only one of many
factors considered by the AT&T board of directors in its
evaluation of the proposed merger and should not be viewed as
determinative of the views of the AT&T board of directors or
management with respect to the merger, the exchange ratio or the
consideration to be received in accordance with the merger
agreement.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
underlying the opinions of CSFB and Morgan Stanley delivered to
the AT&T board of directors. The financial analyses
summarized below include information presented in tabular
format. In order to fully understand CSFBs and Morgan
Stanleys financial analyses, the tables must be read
together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the data in the tables below without considering the
full narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of CSFBs and Morgan
Stanleys financial analyses.
For purposes of their analyses, CSFB and Morgan Stanley
converted the stock consideration and the special cash dividend
to be paid pursuant to the merger agreement into an implied
effective exchange ratio. CSFB and Morgan Stanley calculated
this ratio by multiplying $23.62, the closing price of a share
of SBC common stock on January 28, 2005, by 0.77942, the
exchange ratio, adding $1.30 and dividing the resulting number
by $23.62. The implied effective exchange ratio was 0.834x as of
January 28, 2005.
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
AT&T. CSFB and Morgan Stanley performed a discounted
cash flow analysis (referred to in this document as DCF) with
respect to AT&Ts estimated future cash flows. The DCF
analysis was based on financial forecasts for 2005 prepared and
provided by the management of AT&T and certain publicly
available analyst estimates and projections (including
adjustments thereto) reviewed and discussed with the management
of AT&T for 2006 through 2009 and terminal values based on
multiples of AT&Ts estimated last twelve months
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(referred to in this document as EBITDA) for 2009 ranging from
3.5x to 4.5x. In this document, terminal value
refers to the value of all future cash flows from a business or
asset at a particular point in time. CSFB and Morgan Stanley
discounted the unlevered free cash flows and estimated terminal
value to a present value using discount rates ranging from 8.0%
to 10.0%. CSFB and Morgan Stanley chose the discount rates
utilized in this analysis based upon an analysis of the weighted
average cost of capital of AT&T and selected comparable
companies. Weighted
40
average cost of capital is a measure of the average expected
return on all of a companys securities or loans based on
the proportions of those securities or loans in such
companys capital structure. Based on their experience with
respect to telecommunications companies and their knowledge of
the telecommunications industry in general, CSFB and Morgan
Stanley selected MCI Inc., BellSouth Corporation, Verizon
Communications Inc. and SBC as comparable companies. The DCF
analysis of AT&T indicated a valuation range for AT&T
common stock of $11.09 to $15.13 as compared to AT&Ts
common stock price as of January 28, 2005 of $19.71.
SBC. CSFB and Morgan Stanley also performed a DCF
analysis with respect to SBCs estimated future cash flows
based on certain publicly available research analyst estimates
and projections concerning SBC for 2005 through 2007 and
terminal values based on multiples of SBCs estimated last
twelve months EBITDA for 2007 ranging from 5.5x to 6.5x. CSFB
and Morgan Stanley discounted the unlevered free cash flows and
estimated terminal value to a present value using discount rates
ranging from 7.0% to 9.0%. CSFB and Morgan Stanley chose the
discount rates utilized in this analysis based upon an analysis
of the weighted average cost of capital of SBC and selected
comparable companies. Based on their experience with respect to
telecommunications companies and their knowledge of the
telecommunications industry in general, CSFB and Morgan Stanley
selected BellSouth Corporation and Verizon Communications Inc.
as comparable companies. The DCF analysis of SBC indicated a
valuation range for SBC common stock of $22.27 to $28.81 as
compared to a closing price per share of SBC common stock on
January 28, 2005 of $23.62.
CSFB and Morgan Stanley also considered the range of implied
exchange ratios resulting from these analyses, which ranged from
0.385x, based on the lowest value obtained in the DCF analysis
of AT&T and the highest value obtained in the DCF analysis
of SBC, to 0.679x, based on the highest value obtained in the
DCF analysis of AT&T and the lowest value obtained in the
DCF analysis of SBC, compared to the implied effective exchange
ratio of 0.834x as of January 28, 2005.
In addition, CSFB and Morgan Stanley performed a DCF analysis
with respect to the estimated future cash flows of the combined
company. This DCF analysis was based on cash flows for AT&T
and SBC from 2005 through 2007, terminal value multiples of
estimated last twelve months EBITDA for the pro forma combined
company for 2007 ranging from 5.0x to 6.0x, discount rates
ranging from 7.5% to 9.5% and estimates as to the cost savings
and other potential synergies anticipated to result from the
merger reviewed and discussed by the managements of AT&T and
SBC. The terminal value multiples and discount rates for this
analysis were selected based on a review of the multiples and
rates used by CSFB and Morgan Stanley for SBC and AT&T and
their relative sizes and business mix as parts of the combined
company, CSFB and Morgan Stanleys experience with
analyzing telecommunications companies and their knowledge of
the telecommunications industry in general. This analysis
indicated an implied value per share of AT&T common stock of
$16.76 to $21.71, excluding anticipated synergies, and $19.15 to
$24.63, including anticipated synergies.
CSFB and Morgan Stanley compared the contribution of each of
AT&T and SBC, respectively, to the pro forma combined
company resulting from the merger based on 2005 financial
forecasts for AT&T prepared by AT&T management and
publicly available equity research estimates and projections
(including adjustments thereto) for AT&T for 2006 through
2008 and certain publicly available equity research estimates
and projections for SBC for 2005 through 2008. No cost savings
programs or revenue enhancements were considered in this
analysis. This analysis indicated an implied exchange ratio
ranging from 0.866x, based on the lowest value obtained in the
contribution analysis, to 1.286x, based on the highest value
obtained in the contribution analysis, with respect to
contributions to net income and cash flows from operations for
the period 2005 through 2006, and an implied exchange ratio
ranging from 0.453x, based on the lowest value obtained in the
contribution analysis, to 0.768x, based on the highest value
obtained in the contribution analysis, with respect to
contributions to net income and cash flows from operations for
the period 2007 through 2008, in each case as compared to the
implied effective exchange ratio of 0.834x as of
January 28, 2005.
41
|
|
|
Selected Company Analysis |
CSFB and Morgan Stanley also compared certain financial and
operating information of AT&T and SBC to corresponding
information for companies that CSFB and Morgan Stanley deemed
similar. The selected companies were MCI Inc. with respect to
AT&T, and BellSouth Corporation and Verizon Communications
Inc. with respect to SBC (referred to in this document as the
SBC Peer Group).
In the case of AT&T, CSFB and Morgan Stanley reviewed
MCIs enterprise value, calculated as equity value, plus
net debt and other adjustments, as a multiple of certain
publicly available analyst estimates of MCIs calendar year
2005 and 2006 EBITDA and MCIs dividend yield based on
MCIs closing stock price as of January 28, 2005 and
applied a range of the implied multiples and dividend yields to
the corresponding financial data for AT&T based on financial
forecasts for AT&T for 2005 prepared and provided by the
management of AT&T and certain publicly available analyst
estimates and projections (including adjustments thereto) for
AT&T for 2006 reviewed and discussed with the management of
AT&T. This analysis indicated an implied value per share of
AT&T common stock ranging from $9.50 to $20.50.
In the case of SBC, CSFB and Morgan Stanley compared the SBC
Peer Groups enterprise values as a multiple of certain
publicly available analyst estimates of the SBC Peer
Groups calendar year 2005 and 2006 EBITDA and the SBC Peer
Groups market prices as a multiple of certain publicly
available analyst estimates of the SBC Peer Groups
calendar year 2005 and 2006 earnings per share and cash earnings
per share (defined as earnings per share plus depreciation and
amortization per share), and reviewed the SBC Peer Groups
dividend yields based on the SBC Peer Groups closing stock
prices as of January 28, 2005 and applied the range of the
implied multiples and dividend yields to the corresponding
financial data for SBC. This analysis indicated an implied value
per share of SBC common stock ranging from $21.00 to $26.00.
CSFB and Morgan Stanley noted that such analyses indicated
implied exchange ratios ranging from 0.365x to 0.976x as
compared to the implied effective exchange ratio of 0.834x as of
January 28, 2005.
CSFB and Morgan Stanley noted that the merger and acquisition
transaction environment varies over time because of
macroeconomic factors such as interest rate and equity market
fluctuations and microeconomic factors such as industry results
and growth expectations. CSFB and Morgan Stanley also noted that
no company or transaction reviewed was identical to AT&T,
SBC or the proposed merger and that, accordingly, these analyses
involve complex considerations and judgments concerning
differences in financial and operating characteristics of SBC
and AT&T and other factors that would affect the acquisition
values in the comparable transactions, including the size and
demographic and economic characteristics of the markets of each
company and the competitive environment in which it operates.
Mathematical analyses (such as determining the average or
median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable
transaction data.
Other Considerations
In the course of preparing their opinions, CSFB and Morgan
Stanley also reviewed and considered other information and data,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the potential pro forma effect of the merger on the pro forma
combined companys estimated earnings per share in calendar
years 2006, 2007 and 2008 both before and after giving effect to
potential cost savings and other synergies anticipated to result
from the merger developed jointly by SBC and AT&T and
compared that data to the estimated earnings per share of
AT&T and SBC on a standalone basis. Such analysis indicated
that, after giving effect to potential cost savings and other
synergies, the merger would be accretive to the pro forma
earnings of SBC by 2008; |
|
|
|
|
the implied exchange ratios indicated by the historical trading
prices of AT&T common stock and SBC common stock (based upon
the daily closing share prices of AT&T common stock to
corresponding prices for SBC common stock on January 26,
2005, which was the last trading day before reports of the
proposed SBC/ AT&T merger appeared in the popular press, and
the 10-day, one-month, three-month, six-month and one-year
periods ending January 28, 2005) as compared to the implied
effective exchange ratio of 0.834x (based on the closing share
prices on January 28, 2005) and the implied premium over
such implied exchange ratios: |
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
Exchange | |
|
Implied | |
|
|
Ratio | |
|
Premium | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
January 26, 2005
|
|
|
0.751x |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
10-day average
|
|
|
0.767x |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
One-month average
|
|
|
0.754x |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Three-month average
|
|
|
0.730x |
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
Six-month average
|
|
|
0.652x |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
One-year average
|
|
|
0.686x |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
high, low and median premiums paid in the following transactions
with aggregate values greater than $10 billion since
January 1, 1999, in which 50% or less of the consideration
was in cash and which resulted in holders of the acquired
companys common stock owning 25% or less of the pro forma
combined companys common stock for the ten-day and
six-month periods prior to announcement of the transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
Announced |
|
Target |
|
Acquiror |
|
|
|
|
|
12/04
|
|
Guidant Corp |
|
Johnson & Johnson |
6/04
|
|
SouthTrust |
|
Wachovia |
7/02
|
|
Pharmacia |
|
Pfizer |
12/01
|
|
Immunex Corp |
|
Amgen Inc |
4/01
|
|
American General |
|
AIG |
3/01
|
|
ALZA |
|
Johnson & Johnson |
12/00
|
|
Quaker Oats Co |
|
PepsiCo Inc |
9/00
|
|
Associates First Capital |
|
Citigroup |
7/00
|
|
SDL |
|
JDS Uniphase |
1/00
|
|
E-Tek Dynamics |
|
JDS Uniphase |
9/99
|
|
General Instrument |
|
Motorola |
1/99
|
|
Ascend Communications |
|
Lucent Technologies |
|
|
|
Such analysis indicated implied exchange ratios ranging from
0.820x, based on the lowest value obtained in the premium
analysis, to 1.234x, based on the highest value obtained in the
premium analysis, for the 10-day average and 0.756x, based on
the lowest value obtained in the premium analysis, to 1.609x,
based on the highest value obtained in the premium analysis, for
the six-month average, as compared to the implied effective
exchange ratio of 0.834x as of January 28, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
selected recent publicly available research analyst price
targets from selected firms who published price targets for both
AT&T and SBC as of January 28, 2005. In performing this
analysis, CSFB and Morgan Stanley utilized research analyst
price targets from the following firms: |
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.; |
|
|
|
Prudential Financial Inc.; |
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.; |
|
|
|
RBC Dain Rauscher Inc.; |
|
|
|
CSFB; and |
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley. |
43
|
|
|
For each firm, CSFB and Morgan Stanley calculated exchange
ratios based on the price targets for AT&T and SBC,
respectively. This analysis yielded the following exchange
ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low | |
|
Median | |
|
Mean | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Implied Effective Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
0.510x |
|
|
|
0.551x |
|
|
|
0.603x |
|
|
|
0.821x |
|
CSFB and Morgan Stanley noted that the implied effective
exchange ratio was 0.834x as of January 28, 2005.
Interests of AT&T Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of the AT&T board of
directors with respect to the merger agreement, AT&Ts
shareholders should be aware that some of AT&Ts
executive officers and directors have interests in the merger
and have arrangements that are different from, or in addition
to, those of AT&Ts shareholders generally. The
AT&T board of directors was aware of these interests and
considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decisions
to declare the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement advisable, to adopt the merger agreement
and to recommend that AT&Ts shareholders vote in favor
of approving the merger agreement.
Equity Compensation Awards. The merger agreement provides
that upon completion of the merger, each AT&T compensatory
option, including those held by executive officers and directors
of AT&T, will be converted into an SBC stock option based on
the exchange ratio in the merger. In addition, the merger
agreement provides that, upon completion of the merger, each
restricted stock unit and other stock-based award based upon
shares of AT&T common stock, including those held by
executive officers and directors of AT&T, will be converted
into a restricted stock unit or stock-based award based upon
shares of SBC common stock based on the exchange ratio in the
merger. In addition, AT&T options and other stock-based
awards will be equitably adjusted to take into account the
payment of the $1.30 special dividend in respect of each share
of AT&T common stock. Upon completion of the merger, each
stock option granted on or prior to January 30, 2005 and
restricted stock unit granted on or prior to February 3,
2005 will vest in full in accordance with the terms of the
original grants. Each stock option granted after
January 30, 2005 and restricted stock unit granted after
February 3, 2005 will vest upon a termination of employment
giving rise to severance benefits under the Senior Officer
Separation Plan described below. Upon completion of the merger,
each performance share will be paid to executive officers on a
pro rata basis in accordance with policies established by the
AT&T Compensation and Employee Benefit Committee and as
provided in the AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan. Based on
AT&T equity compensation awards held by executive officers
and directors of AT&T as of February 3, 2005 and
assuming a closing date of December 31, 2005, upon
completion of the merger, Mr. James W. Cicconi, General
Counsel & Executive Vice President of AT&T,
Mr. David W. Dorman, Chairman of Board and CEO of AT&T,
Mr. Hossein Eslambolchi, President of AT&T Global
Network Technology Services and CTO & CIO of AT&T,
Mr. William J. Hannigan, President and COO of AT&T and
Mr. Thomas W. Horton, Vice Chairman and CFO of AT&T,
the remaining executive officers, as a group, and the remaining
directors, as a group, respectively, would vest, as of
completion of the merger, in respect of 220,196, 660,589,
176,157, 547,500 and 338,124 and 440,306 and 5,848 shares
subject to their stock options and 112,800, 462,700, 211,400,
262,450 and 187,900 and 195,160 and 99,848 shares with
respect to their restricted stock units and other stock-based
awards. Based on AT&T performance share awards outstanding
as of February 3, 2005 and assuming a closing date of
December 31, 2005, upon completion of the merger,
Messrs. Cicconi, Dorman, Eslambolchi, Hannigan and Horton,
and the remaining executive officers, respectively as a group,
would be distributed, as of completion of the merger, 74,600,
372,766, 104,667, 243,233 and 143,466 and 194,326 shares of
AT&T common stock with respect to their performance share
awards.
Senior Officer Separation Plan. AT&T maintains the
AT&T Senior Officer Separation Plan pursuant to which each
of the executive officers are eligible to receive severance
benefits if, during the two-year period following a change in
control such as the merger, the participants employment
with AT&T is terminated by AT&T (other than for
cause or by reason of the participants
disability) or by the participant for good reason.
44
Subject to the participants execution and non-revocation
of a release following such a termination, a participant will
receive the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A severance payment made partially in cash and partially in the
form of a special change in control credit to his or
her cash balance pension account as set forth in the Management
Pension Plan and the Excess Benefit and Compensation Plan (as
described below). The cash portion of the severance payment is
equal to the difference between (1) three times the sum of
(A) the participants annual base salary and
(B) the participants target bonus as of the year in
which the change in control occurs (or if no target bonus has
been set forth such year, the year immediately preceding the
year in which the change in control occurs) and (2) an
amount equal to 90% of the participants special
change in control credit; |
|
|
|
a pro rata bonus through the date of termination for the year in
which the participants termination of employment occurs; |
|
|
|
certain life insurance and death benefits and medical and dental
coverage following the date of termination; |
|
|
|
payment of any unvested cash awards/payments; |
|
|
|
a cash payment sufficient to provide financial counseling for
two years following the date of termination; and |
|
|
|
outplacement services (provided such services begin within one
year of termination). |
In the event that any amounts payable or benefits provided to a
participant become subject to the excise taxes imposed under
Section 4999 of the Code, the participant will be entitled
to an additional payment such that he or she will be placed in
the same after-tax position as if no excise tax had been imposed.
Assuming that the merger is completed on December 31, 2005
and each of the executive officers employment is
terminated by AT&T without cause immediately
after completion, the amount of severance (based upon current
base salaries and target bonus amounts) that would be payable to
each of Messrs. Cicconi, Dorman, Eslambolchi, Hannigan and
Horton and the remaining executive officers, as a group, is
$3,840,000, $10,275,000, $4,050,000, $6,459,750 and $4,676,250
and $11,994,000.
Employment Agreement with David W. Dorman. SBC has
entered into an employment agreement, dated as of
January 30, 2005, with Mr. Dorman. The agreement
provides for a term of employment commencing upon completion of
the merger and ending on Mr. Dormans date of
termination of employment. Provided that Mr. Dorman remains
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
of AT&T through the completion of the merger,
Mr. Dorman will serve as SBCs President and as a
member of its board of directors during the term of the
agreement.
During the term, Mr. Dorman will receive an annual base
salary of no less than his annual base salary for 2005 as such
amount may be increased prior to completion of the merger. In
addition, for each fiscal year ending during the term,
Mr. Dorman will be eligible to be awarded an annual bonus
in cash on substantially the same terms as peer executives of
SBC and its affiliates, which for the fiscal year beginning
immediately prior to completion of the merger will be pro rated
and at least at the same target percentage of annual base salary
as was established by AT&T for 2005. Upon completion of the
merger, all of Mr. Dormans options to purchase shares
of AT&T common stock will vest in full, and each option will
remain exercisable for the remainder of its full term as
provided by its terms. In addition, all other AT&T
equity-based or other long or short-term incentive awards held
by Mr. Dorman will vest in full or be paid out, as the case
may be, and any performance awards will be distributed as
provided by their terms. Mr. Dorman also will be eligible
to participate on the same terms as peer executives of SBC and
its affiliates in all long-term incentive plans of SBC beginning
with the first performance period starting after completion of
the merger. During the term, Mr. Dorman will be eligible
for, and receive benefits under, employee benefit and perquisite
arrangements no less favorable than those generally applicable
or made available to peer executives of SBC and, during the
first six months of the term, those generally applicable or made
available to Mr. Dorman prior to completion of the merger.
45
If, during the first six months of the term,
Mr. Dormans employment is terminated by SBC without
cause (as defined in the agreement) or Mr. Dorman resigns
for any reason, Mr. Dorman will be entitled to receive:
|
|
|
|
|
A pro rata target bonus for the year in which the termination
occurs; |
|
|
|
An amount equal to the amount Mr. Dorman would have been
entitled to receive under any plan, agreement or program of
AT&T (other than his AT&T SERP described below) had his
employment been terminated without cause immediately after
completion of the merger (subject to Mr. Dormans
execution of any release required under any such plan, agreement
or program); |
|
|
|
Vesting and full term exercisability (as provided by their
terms) for all AT&T equity based awards; |
|
|
|
Payment of an annuity under his supplemental retirement
arrangement equal to 60 percent of his final three-year
average total cash compensation with a 50% joint and survivor
annuity to Mr. Dorman and his spouse; and |
|
|
|
Lifetime medical and dental benefits on the same terms and at
the same cost as such benefits would have been provided had
Mr. Dorman terminated employment as of immediately before
completion of the merger, and Mr. Dorman will be covered
under SBCs Executive Health Plan or successor plan. |
If, during the first six months of the term,
Mr. Dormans employment is terminated by SBC without
cause (as defined in the agreement) or Mr. Dorman resigns
for any reason, a consulting agreement entered into between
Mr. Dorman and SBC in connection with entering into the
employment agreement will become effective. Under the consulting
agreement, Mr. Dorman will provide consulting services for
a three-year period following his termination as may be
reasonably requested by the board of directors of SBC or the
Chief Executive Officer of SBC. In consideration for providing
such services, Mr. Dorman will be granted
400,000 shares of restricted stock of SBC that will vest in
three equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries
of the date of grant. If Mr. Dormans consulting
services are terminated during the term of the consulting
agreement on account of his death, disability or by SBC other
than for cause, the restrictions on the then remaining shares of
restricted stock, if any, will immediately lapse. If
Mr. Dorman voluntarily terminates the consulting agreement
or is terminated by SBC for cause then any unvested shares of
restricted stock will be forfeited.
If Mr. Dormans employment is terminated by SBC for
cause or for any reason after the first 6 months of the
term, the only compensation and benefits he will receive are
(i) his unpaid annual base salary, (ii) the AT&T
SERP (if his termination is not for cause) and (iii) any
other vested and accrued benefits.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Dorman is restricted
from revealing confidential information of SBC and, during
Mr. Dormans employment and consultancy and, in the
event that Mr. Dormans employment or consultancy is
terminated by SBC for cause, for a one-year period after such
termination, Mr. Dorman may not solicit for employment any
employees of SBC and may not compete with SBC. In the event that
any payments to Mr. Dorman are subject to an excise tax
under Section 4999 of the Code, Mr. Dorman will be
entitled to an additional payment so that he remains in the same
after-tax position he would have been in had the excise tax not
been imposed, unless the value of the parachute
payments to Mr. Dorman is less than 110% of the
maximum amount that Mr. Dorman could receive without being
subject to the excise tax, in which case Mr. Dormans
parachute payments will be reduced to the maximum
amount that Mr. Dorman could receive without being subject
to the excise tax.
Retention Program. Pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement, AT&T may establish a retention pool in amount not
to exceed $100 million for the benefit of its employees
under which each executive officer (other than members of the
executive committee) may be allocated a cash retention bonus.
Any retention bonus granted to such an executive officer may not
exceed three times the executive officers annual base
salary without AT&T consulting with SBC. Retention bonuses
would be payable to the executive officers on a date established
by AT&T which may be no earlier than six months following
completion of the merger, subject to the executive
officers continued employment through such date. If,
however, the executive officers employment were to be
terminated by AT&T without cause or by the
executive officer for good reason
46
prior to the date on which the retention bonus would be payable,
the executive officer would be entitled to the retention bonus.
AT&T Management Pension Plan. Under the terms of
AT&Ts management pension plan, if during the two-year
period following a change in control, such as the merger, a
participants employment with AT&T is terminated by
AT&T (other than for cause or by reason of the
participants disability) or by the participant for
good reason, as of the participants date of
termination of employment, the participant (including an
executive officer) will become fully vested in his or her
benefit under the plan, any unbridged credited service will be
bridged, the participant will be deemed to have completed the
minimum period of credited service required for full conversion
of the pension under the previous formula to a cash balance
formula, he or she will receive a special change in
control credit to his cash balance account plus interest
from the end of the month in which the change in control occurs,
and the participant may elect to receive his pension benefit in
a lump sum or the existing annuity forms of benefit in the plan.
The special change in control credit is an amount
equal to the participants eligible pay as defined in the
Plan for the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar
year in which the change in control occurs multiplied by the
lesser of five percent for each whole year of the
participants employment through the change in control or
100 percent.
AT&T Excess Benefit and Compensation Plan. Under the
terms of AT&Ts excess benefit and compensation plan,
as of an eligible participants date of termination
following a change in control such as the merger, the
participant (including an executive officer) will receive the
special change in control credit as described above
under the Management Pension Plan based on eligible pay in
excess of the applicable limit under Section 401
(a) (17) of the Code and his or her accrued pension
benefit will include the special change in control credit for
purposes of determining the participants benefit under the
excess benefit and compensation plan. Benefits under the plan
are secured by assets in the AT&T Benefit Protection Trust.
Savings Plans. Under each of the AT&T Long Term
Savings Plan for Management Employees, the AT&T Retirement
Savings and Profit Sharing Plan and the AT&T of Puerto Rico,
Inc. Long Term Savings Plan for Management Employees, if during
the two-year period following a change in control, such as the
merger, a participants employment with AT&T is
terminated by AT&T (other than for cause or by
reason of the participants death or disability) or by the
participant for good reason, the participant,
including each executive officer, will become fully vested in
any benefits accrued through the date of a change in control
such as the merger.
Non-Qualified Pension Plan. Under the AT&T
Non-Qualified Pension Plan, each participant, including each
executive officer, will become fully vested in any benefits
accrued through the date of a change in control such as the
merger. Benefits under the plan are secured by assets in the
AT&T Benefit Protection Trust.
Executive Life Insurance Benefits. Under the AT&T
Senior Officer Separation Plan, a participant in the AT&T
Executive Life Insurance Program, including an executive
officer, will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the
sum of (1) the present value of any necessary future life
insurance premium payments that are estimated to be sufficient
to provide continuation of coverage at the participants
applicable benefit amount under the AT&T
Executive Life Insurance Program policy as if the participant
had continued in the active employment of AT&T until
becoming eligible for postretirement medical benefits, plus
(2) a tax adjustment payment, if, during the two-year
period following a change in control such as the merger, the
participants employment is terminated by AT&T (other
than for cause or by reason of the
participants disability) or by the participant for
good reason. In addition, the AT&T Executive
Life Insurance Program must remain in effect for at least two
years following a change in control such as the merger.
AT&T Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Upon a
change in control such as the merger, individual deferral and
benefit agreements with executive officers and individual
nonqualified pension agreements with executive officers will be
covered under the plan; all plan accounts, individual deferral
agreements with executive officers and individual nonqualified
pension agreements with executive officers will be secured
through the AT&T Benefits Protection Trust; all account
balances that are unvested as of the change in control such as
the merger will become fully vested as of the change of control
and the rate of interest accrual following a change in control
may be no less than the rate of accrual immediately prior to the
change in control. In connection with the merger, AT&T has
reserved the right to distribute account balances to
47
participants in the AT&T Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan after giving SBC the opportunity to review and comment upon
any amendments effectuating such distributions.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Arrangements. As
discussed under The AT&T Annual Meeting Proposals and
Information Employment Contracts and Termination of
Employment Agreements, AT&T is a party to special
individual non-qualified pension arrangements (each, an
AT&T SERP) with four executive officers, which
provide annual retirement benefits determined as a percentage
(based on year of termination) of the executive officers
final three-year average total cash compensation. The AT&T
SERP is reduced by other pension benefits payable from AT&T
and prior employers. Upon a change in control, such as the
merger, each of the executive officers who are party to the
individual AT&T SERP will become fully vested in their
AT&T SERP benefits to the extent not then vested. In the
event that, within two years following a change in control, such
as the merger, the executive officers employment is
terminated by AT&T other than for cause or by
the executive for good reason, the percentage of the
executive officers final three-year average total cash
compensation will be determined as if the executive officer had
provided three additional years of service to AT&T.
Mr. Dormans AT&T SERP was modified by his
employment agreement with SBC, as discussed above. For the other
executive officers, assuming that the merger is completed on
December 31, 2005 and the executive officers
employment is terminated by AT&T without cause immediately
thereafter, the percentage of final three-year average total
cash compensation payable to Messrs. Hannigan, Horton and
the other executive officer who is party to the individual
AT&T SERP, would be 18%, 14%, and 27.5%, respectively.
Benefits under these individual arrangements are secured by
assets in the AT&T Benefit Protection Trust.
AT&T Short Term Incentive Plan and AT&T Management
Pay Plan. As soon as administratively possible after the
occurrence of a change in control such as the merger, pro rata
annual bonuses through the date on which the change in control
occurs will be paid to participants, including executive
officers, at the greater of the target award or actual
performance through the first date of the month in which the
change in control occurs.
AT&T Retiree Welfare Benefits. For purposes of each
of the AT&T Post-retirement Welfare Benefits Plan, the
AT&T Long-Term Care Plan for Retired Employees and the
AT&T Supplementary Life Insurance Plan, if during the
two-year period following a change in control, the employment of
a management employee, including an executive officer, with
AT&T is terminated by AT&T (other than for
cause or by reason of the participants death
or disability) or by the participant for good
reason, the management employee will become a participant
in the plan (1) if the sum of the participants age
and credited service equals 65 years and (2) the
participant had at least five years of credited service with
AT&T as of December 31, 1999.
AT&T Medical Expense Plan and AT&T Dental Expense
Plan for Active Employees. AT&T will pay the cost of
continuation of coverage for a period of up to 18 months
following the termination of a participants (including
each executive officers) employment following a change in
control such as the merger. Such coverage period for the medical
and dental benefits will run concurrently with the applicable
COBRA continuation coverage period set forth under
Section 4980B of the Code. In addition, AT&T Medical
Expense Plan and AT&T Dental Expense Plan may not be amended
to eliminate the continuation of coverage.
AT&T Separation Medical Plan. If, at the end of the
applicable COBRA continuation coverage period set forth under
Section 4980 of the Code, an eligible executive officer is
not covered under another group health plan, AT&T will make
medical coverage available for the eligible executive officer
and his or her dependents under the AT&T Separation Medical
Plan on the same basis as for certain former senior managers.
Should a participant elect to receive this coverage, the
eligible executive officer will be responsible for the same
portion of the annual premium for this medical coverage as
then-applicable to similarly situated executives covered under
the AT&T Separation Medical Plan.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of the material United States federal
income tax consequences of the special dividend and the merger
to U.S. holders of AT&T common stock. The summary is
based on the Code,
48
Treasury regulations thereunder and administrative rulings and
court decisions in effect as of the date of this document, all
of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with
retroactive effect.
For purposes of this discussion, the term
U.S. holder means:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized
under the laws of the United States or any of its political
subdivisions; |
|
|
|
a trust if it |
|
|
|
|
|
is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the
United States and one or more United States persons have the
authority to control all substantial decisions of the
trust, or |
|
|
|
has a valid election in effect under applicable United States
Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States
person; or |
|
|
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source. |
If a partnership holds AT&T common stock, the tax treatment
of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partners
and the activities of the partnership. If a U.S. holder is
a partner in a partnership holding AT&T common stock, such
holder should consult its tax advisor.
This discussion only addresses AT&T shareholders that hold
their shares of AT&T common stock as a capital asset within
the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this
summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income
taxation that may be relevant to an AT&T shareholder in
light of such holders particular circumstances or that may
be applicable to holders subject to special treatment under
United States federal income tax law (including, for example,
non-United States persons, financial institutions, dealers in
securities, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, holders
who acquired AT&T common stock pursuant to the exercise of
employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, holders
subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code,
and holders who hold AT&T common stock as part of a hedge,
straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction). In
addition, no information is provided herein with respect to the
tax consequences of the special dividend or the merger under
applicable state, local or non-United States laws.
HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS
REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE SPECIAL DIVIDEND AND THE
MERGER TO THEM, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL,
STATE AND LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, AT&T will pay
a special dividend of $1.30 per share of AT&T common
stock to holders of record of AT&T common stock as of a
record date to be set by the AT&T board of directors,
unless, as described below, the merger is restructured to
include in the per share merger consideration the per share
amount of the special dividend that would otherwise be payable
by AT&T.
If the special dividend is paid by AT&T, it will be paid
following the adoption of the merger agreement and prior to the
effective time of the merger. Based on the advice of its
counsel, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, AT&T
intends to report the payment of the special dividend as a
dividend for United States federal income tax purposes.
Generally, individual holders who meet applicable holding period
requirements under the Code for qualified dividends
will be taxed on the special dividend at a maximum federal
income tax rate of 15%. Holders should consult their tax
advisors regarding any alternative characterization of the
special dividend, including as consideration received from
AT&T in exchange for their shares of AT&T common stock.
In addition, holders that are corporations should consult their
tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of the
extraordinary dividend provisions of the Code.
The merger has been structured to qualify as a reorganization
under Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal
income tax purposes. As described below, it is a condition to
the closing of the merger
49
that AT&T and SBC will receive opinions from Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Sullivan & Cromwell
LLP, respectively, dated as of the closing date of the merger,
to the effect that the merger will qualify as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that
each of SBC, AT&T and Merger Sub will be a party to such
reorganization.
In addition, in connection with the filing of the registration
statement of which this document is a part, AT&T has
received an opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
and SBC has received an opinion of Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, each to the effect that the merger will
qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Each of these opinions is based
on representations made by AT&T, SBC and Merger Sub, and on
customary factual assumptions. Accordingly, the following
material federal income tax consequences will apply:
Exchange Solely for SBC Common Stock. If the merger is
not restructured to include in the per share merger
consideration the per share amount of the special dividend that
would otherwise be payable, the material United States federal
income consequences to holders of AT&T common stock will be
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a holder will not recognize any gain or loss upon receipt of SBC
common stock solely in exchange for AT&T common stock,
except with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional
share of SBC common stock (as discussed below); |
|
|
|
the aggregate tax basis of the shares of SBC common stock
received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed
received and redeemed as described below) will be equal to the
aggregate tax basis in the shares of AT&T common stock
surrendered; and |
|
|
|
the holding period of the SBC common stock received in the
merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and
redeemed as described below) will include the holding period of
the shares of AT&T common stock surrendered. |
Exchange for SBC Common Stock and Cash. The merger
agreement provides that if it becomes necessary in order to
satisfy the tax opinion conditions of the merger agreement, the
merger will be restructured to include in the amount of merger
consideration that each holder of AT&T common stock receives
the per share amount of the special dividend that would
otherwise be payable by AT&T. If the merger is restructured
to include in the per share merger consideration the per share
amount of the special dividend that would otherwise be payable,
the material United States federal income consequences to
holders of AT&T common stock will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
if the holders adjusted tax basis in the AT&T common
stock surrendered is less than the sum of the fair market value,
as of the closing date of the merger, of the SBC common stock
and the amount of cash received by the holder, then the holder
will recognize gain in an amount equal to the lesser of
(1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market
value, as of the closing date of the merger, of the SBC common
stock received, minus the adjusted tax basis of the AT&T
common stock surrendered in exchange therefor, and (2) the
amount of cash received by the holder in the exchange. However,
if a holders adjusted tax basis in the AT&T common
stock surrendered in the transaction is greater than the sum of
the amount of cash and the fair market value of the SBC common
stock received, the holders loss will not be currently
allowed or recognized for United States federal income tax
purposes. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding
the manner in which cash and SBC common stock should be
allocated among different blocks of AT&T common stock. Any
recognized gain generally will be long-term capital gain if the
holders holding period with respect to the AT&T common
stock surrendered is more than one year at the effective time of
the merger. In some cases, if the holder actually or
constructively owns SBC common stock other than SBC common stock
received as a result of the merger, the recognized gain could be
treated as having the effect of the distribution of a dividend
under the tests set forth in Section 302 of the Code, in
which case such gain would be treated as dividend income. In
such cases, holders that are corporations should consult their
tax advisors regarding the potential applicability of the
extraordinary dividend provisions of the Code. |
|
|
|
The aggregate tax basis of SBC common stock received (including
any fractional shares deemed received and redeemed as described
below) by a holder that exchanges its shares of AT&T common
stock for a combination of SBC common stock and cash pursuant to
the merger will be equal to the |
50
|
|
|
|
|
aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares of AT&T common
stock surrendered for SBC common stock and cash, reduced by the
amount of cash received by the holder pursuant to the merger
(excluding any cash received instead of a fractional share of
SBC common stock) and increased by the amount of gain (including
any portion of the gain that is treated as a dividend as
described above but excluding any gain or loss resulting from
the deemed receipt and redemption of fractional shares described
below), if any, recognized by the holder on the exchange. |
|
|
|
The holding period of the SBC common stock received (including
fractional shares deemed received and redeemed as described
below) will include the holding period of the AT&T common
stock surrendered. |
Cash in lieu of Fractional Shares. A holder of AT&T
common stock who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of
SBC common stock generally will be treated as having received
such fractional share in the merger and then as having received
cash in redemption of such fractional share. Gain or loss
generally will be recognized based on the difference between the
amount of cash received in lieu of the fractional share and the
portion of the holders aggregate tax basis in the shares
of AT&T common stock surrendered which is allocable to the
fractional share. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term
capital gain or loss if the holding period for such shares of
AT&T common stock is more than one year at the effective
time of the merger.
Closing Condition Tax Opinions. It is a condition to the
closing of the merger that AT&T and SBC will receive
opinions from Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, respectively, dated as of
the closing date of the merger, to the effect that the merger
will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code and that each of SBC, AT&T
and Merger Sub will be a party to such reorganization. These
opinions will be based on representation letters provided by
AT&T, SBC and Merger Sub to be delivered at the time of
closing and on customary factual assumptions. Although the
merger agreement allows each of them to waive this tax opinion
condition to closing, SBC and AT&T currently do not
anticipate doing so. If SBC and AT&T waive these conditions
and the tax consequences of the merger are materially different
from those described in this document, SBC and AT&T will
inform you of this decision and ask you to vote on the merger
taking this into consideration.
No ruling has been or will be sought from the Internal Revenue
Service as to the United States federal income tax consequences
of the merger, and the opinions of counsel are not binding upon
the Internal Revenue Service or any court. Accordingly, there
can be no assurances that the Internal Revenue Service will not
disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described
herein.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Payments of
cash made in connection with the merger may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding at a
rate of 28%, unless a holder of AT&T common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
provides a correct taxpayer identification number and any other
required information to the exchange agent; or |
|
|
|
is a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and
otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup
withholding rules. |
All non-corporate holders of AT&T common stock should
complete and sign the Substitute Form W-9 included as part
of the letter of transmittal to be delivered following
completion of the merger. Backup withholding does not constitute
an additional tax, but merely an advance payment of tax, which
may be refunded to the extent it results in an overpayment of
tax, provided that the required information is supplied to the
Internal Revenue Service.
Accounting Treatment
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition of AT&T
by SBC under the purchase method of accounting of U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Under the purchase method of
accounting, the assets and liabilities of the acquired company
are, as of completion of the merger, recorded at their
respective fair values and added to those of the reporting
public issuer, including an amount for goodwill representing the
difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the
identifiable net assets. Financial statements of
51
SBC issued after consummation of the merger will reflect only
the operations of AT&T after the merger and will not be
restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial
position or results of operations of AT&T.
All unaudited pro forma financial information contained in this
document has been prepared using the purchase method to account
for the merger. The final allocation of the purchase price will
be determined after the merger is completed and after completion
of an analysis to determine the assigned fair values of
AT&Ts tangible and identifiable intangible assets and
liabilities. In addition, estimates related to restructuring and
merger-related charges are subject to final decisions related to
combining AT&T into SBC. Accordingly, the final purchase
accounting adjustments may be materially different from the
unaudited pro forma adjustments. Any decrease in the net fair
value of the assets and liabilities of AT&T as compared to
the unaudited pro forma information included in this document
will have the effect of increasing the amount of the purchase
price allocable to goodwill.
Regulatory Matters Related to the Merger
The merger is subject to the requirements of the HSR Act, and
the rules promulgated under the HSR Act by the FTC, which
prevent transactions such as the merger from being completed
until required information and materials are furnished to the
DOJ, and the FTC and the applicable waiting period are
terminated or expire. On February 22, 2005, SBC and
AT&T filed the requisite Pre-Merger Notification and Report
Forms under the HSR Act with the DOJ and the FTC. On
March 24, 2005, the DOJ issued requests for additional
information and documentary material to SBC and AT&T. The
parties are now in the process of compiling this information and
material. As a result, the waiting period will expire on the
thirtieth day after SBC and AT&T have substantially complied
with this request. The DOJ, the FTC and others may challenge the
merger on antitrust grounds either before or after expiration or
termination of the waiting period. Accordingly, at any time
before or after the completion of the merger, any of the DOJ,
the FTC or others could take action under the antitrust laws as
it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest,
including without limitation seeking to enjoin the completion of
the merger or permitting completion subject to regulatory
concessions or conditions. We cannot assure you that a challenge
to the merger will not be made or that, if a challenge is made,
it will not prevail.
The Federal Communications Act of 1934, as amended, requires the
approval of the FCC prior to any transfer of control of certain
types of licenses and other authorizations issued by the FCC. On
February 22, 2005, SBC and AT&T filed applications for
FCC consent to the transfer of control of AT&T and the
AT&T subsidiaries that hold such licenses and authorizations
to SBC. Applications for FCC consents are subject to public
comment and objections and oppositions of third parties who may
interpose objections. On March 11, 2005 the FCC placed the
application on public notice and invited interested parties to
file comments or petitions to deny no later than April 25,
2005. Responses or oppositions to such pleadings are due on
May 10, 2005. The FCC has set for itself a goal of
completing action on transfer of control applications within
180 days of public notice of the application, which target
completion date would be on or around September 7, 2005 for
the applications filed by SBC and AT&T. However, no law or
regulation requires the FCC to complete its action by that date,
or any date, and the FCC acknowledges that more complex
applications may take longer. We cannot assure you that the
requisite FCC approval will be obtained on a timely basis or at
all. In addition, we cannot assure you that such approval will
not include conditions that could result in the abandonment of
the merger.
|
|
|
State Regulatory Approvals |
AT&T and various of its subsidiaries hold certificates,
licenses and service authorizations issued by the state PUCs.
Approximately 22 state commissions and the District of
Columbia commission require formal applications for the transfer
of control of these certificates, licenses and authorizations to
SBC. Applications for state approvals are subject to public
comment and objections and oppositions of third parties who may
interpose objections. In addition to these applications, SBC and
AT&T will file notifications of the merger in
52
the remaining states. In some of these states, the public
utility commissions could initiate proceedings in response to
the notification. SBC and AT&T filed these state transfer
applications and notifications with the state PUCs on
February 28, 2005. Certain of these state PUCs have already
granted their approval as of the date of this document, while
the other state PUCs are still reviewing the applications. SBC
and AT&T believe that the merger complies with applicable
state standards for approval, but there can be no assurance that
the state PUCs will timely grant the transfer applications or
not subject their approval to conditions or restrictions.
The merger may require the approval of municipalities where
AT&T holds franchises to provide communications and other
services.
|
|
|
Foreign and Certain Other Regulatory Matters |
SBC and AT&T will be required to obtain approvals for the
merger from, or provide notice of the merger to, governmental
entities regulating competition and telecommunications
businesses or the use of radio spectrum or regulating investment
in certain countries outside the United States where AT&T
conducts business. We do not currently anticipate that our
pursuit of any of these clearances or approvals will hinder,
delay or restrict completion of the merger.
The merger may be subject to certain regulatory requirements of
other municipal, state, federal and foreign governmental
agencies and authorities, including those relating to the offer
and sale of securities. We are currently working to evaluate and
comply in all material respects with these requirements, as
appropriate, and do not currently anticipate that they will
hinder, delay or restrict completion of the merger.
Merger Fees, Costs and Expenses
All expenses incurred in connection with the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will
be paid by the party incurring those expenses. See The
Merger Agreement Covenants and
Agreements Fees and Expenses on page 65.
No Dissenters Rights of Appraisal
The New York Business Corporation Law (which is referred to in
this document as the NYBCL) provides that in some mergers,
shareholders who do not vote in favor of a merger and who comply
with a series of statutory requirements have the right to
receive, instead of the merger consideration, the fair value of
their shares as appraised by the courts, payable in cash.
However, this right to appraisal is not available under the
NYBCL to holders of AT&T common stock in connection with the
merger contemplated under the merger agreement.
Resale of SBC Common Stock
In general, shares of SBC common stock issued to AT&T
shareholders pursuant to the merger will be freely transferable,
except for any shares received by persons who may be deemed to
be affiliates of the parties under the Securities
Act. Affiliates generally include individuals or entities that
control, are controlled by, or are under common control with a
person. Affiliates may sell their shares of SBC common stock
only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act covering the resale of those shares, an exemption
under Rule 145(d) of the Securities Act or any other
applicable exemption under the Securities Act. SBCs
registration statement on Form S-4, of which this document
constitutes a part, does not cover the resale of SBC common
stock held by affiliates after the transactions.
53
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of selected provisions of the
merger agreement. While SBC and AT&T believe this
description covers the material terms of the merger agreement,
it may not contain all of the information that is important to
you and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger
agreement, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety
into, and is attached as Annex A to, this document. We urge
you to read the merger agreement in its entirety.
This document contains a description of representations and
warranties made in the merger agreement. Representations and
warranties are also set forth in agreements and other documents
that are filed as exhibits to this document or incorporated by
reference into this document. These representations and
warranties were made only for purposes of such agreements or
other documents and solely for the benefit of the parties to
such agreements or other documents as of specific dates, may be
subject to important limitations and qualifications agreed by
the contracting parties, and may not be complete. Furthermore,
these representations and warranties may have been made for the
purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties to
such agreements or other documents instead of establishing these
matters as facts, and may or may not have been accurate as of
any specific date and do not purport to be accurate as of the
date of this document. Accordingly, you should not rely upon the
descriptions of representations and warranties or the actual
representations and warranties contained in such agreements and
other documents (including the merger agreement) as statements
of factual information since they were intended to be limited to
the parties to, and the purposes of, such agreements or other
documents. Information about SBC or AT&T can be found
elsewhere in this document and in public filings each of SBC and
AT&T makes with the SEC. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page 144.
The Merger
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the
merger agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into
AT&T. As a result of the merger, AT&T will be the
surviving corporation and will become a wholly owned subsidiary
of SBC. The separate corporate existence of AT&T, with all
its rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises, will
continue unaffected by the merger, except as set forth in the
merger agreement.
Closing and Effectiveness of the Merger
The closing of the merger will occur on the fifth business day
after the satisfaction or waiver of all of the closing
conditions provided in the merger agreement, except for those
conditions that, by their terms, are to be satisfied at the
closing (but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those
conditions), or on such other date as SBC and AT&T may agree
in writing. See Conditions to the Merger
beginning on page 66.
As soon as practicable following the closing, SBC and AT&T
will deliver an executed and acknowledged certificate of merger
to the Department of State of the State of New York. At that
time, or at such later time as may be agreed by the parties in
writing and specified in the certificate of merger, the merger
will become effective.
Surviving Corporations Governing Documents, Officers
and Directors; SBCs Post-Closing Directors
Surviving Corporation Governing Documents. At the
effective time of the merger, the certificate of incorporation
of the surviving corporation will be in the form of the
certificate of incorporation attached to the merger agreement
and the by-laws of Merger Sub in effect at the effective time of
the merger will be the by-laws of the surviving corporation, in
each case until thereafter amended as provided therein or by
applicable laws.
Surviving Corporation Officers and Directors. The
directors and officers of Merger Sub at the effective time of
the merger will, from and after the effective time, be the
directors and officers of the surviving corporation until their
successors will have been duly elected or appointed and
qualified or until their earlier
54
death, resignation or removal in accordance with the surviving
corporations certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
SBCs Post-Closing Board of Directors. At the
effective time of the merger, SBC will increase the size of its
board of directors to enable it to appoint David W. Dorman, the
current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T, plus
two other members of the board of directors of AT&T selected
by mutual agreement of SBC and AT&T, as members of the board
of directors of SBC, and the board of directors of SBC will
appoint each of Mr. Dorman and the other two designees to
serve as directors until their successors shall have been duly
elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death,
resignation or removal in accordance with SBCs restated
certificate of incorporation and by-laws. For a more complete
description with respect to the appointment of Mr. Dorman
to the SBC board of directors see The Merger
Interests of AT&T Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger Employment Agreement with David W.
Dorman beginning on page 45.
Merger Consideration and Special Dividend
Conversion of AT&T Common Stock. At the effective
time of the merger, each share of AT&T common stock issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other
than any shares of AT&T common stock owned by SBC, AT&T
or any of their respective subsidiaries, which shares are not
beneficially owned by third parties) will be converted into the
right to receive 0.77942 of a share of SBC common stock,
together with the right, if any, to receive cash in lieu of
fractional shares of SBC common stock. See
Fractional SBC Common Shares below. In
addition, immediately prior to the effective time of the merger,
a special dividend of $1.30 per share will become payable
to each holder of a share of AT&T common stock as of a
record date that would be set by the AT&T board of
directors. See Covenants and
Agreements Special Dividend below.
For more information regarding the SBC common stock, see
Description of SBC Capital Stock SBC Common
Stock.
Conversion of AT&T Subsidiary Preferred Stock. At the
effective time of the merger, each share of AT&T subsidiary
preferred stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger will be converted into the right to
receive one share of SBC preferred stock having a value
substantially equivalent, in SBCs judgment, to an AT&T
subsidiary preferred share at the effective time of the merger
and having such other terms as necessary to ensure that the SBC
preferred stock would not constitute non-qualified
preferred stock for federal income tax purposes and any
other terms necessary so as not to prevent the delivery of the
tax opinions described in Conditions to the
Merger below.
Cancellation of Other AT&T Common Stock. At the
effective time of the merger, shares of AT&T common stock
owned by SBC, AT&T or any of their respective subsidiaries,
except for shares that are beneficially owned by third parties,
will be canceled and retired without payment of any
consideration therefor and will cease to exist.
Conversion of Merger Sub Stock. At the effective time of
the merger, each share of common stock of Merger Sub issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be
converted into one share of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of the surviving corporation.
Fractional SBC Common Shares. Fractional shares of SBC
common stock will not be issued in the merger. Instead, any
holder of shares of AT&T common stock who otherwise would
have been entitled to receive a fractional share of SBC common
stock will be entitled to receive a cash payment in lieu thereof
in an amount equal to the product obtained by multiplying
(1) the fractional part of a share of SBC common stock an
AT&T stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive by
(2) the average closing price for a share of SBC common
stock as reported on the NYSE composite transactions reporting
system for the 20 trading days ending on the fifth trading day
prior to the closing date of the merger.
Exchange Procedures. As soon as practicable after the
effective time of the merger, an exchange agent selected by SBC
with AT&Ts approval will provide appropriate
transmittal materials to holders of record of
55
AT&T common stock, advising such holders of the procedure
for surrendering their shares to the exchange agent.
Upon the surrender of the holders shares of AT&T
common stock, the holder will be entitled to receive in exchange
therefor:
|
|
|
|
|
whole shares of SBC common stock that such holder is entitled to
receive pursuant to the merger, as described in
Conversion of AT&T Common Stock
above; and |
|
|
|
a check in the amount, after giving effect to any required tax
withholdings, of any cash payable in lieu of fractional shares
plus any unpaid non-stock dividends and any other dividends or
other distributions that such holder has the right to receive as
described in the next paragraph. |
All shares of SBC common stock to be issued pursuant to the
merger will be deemed issued and outstanding as of the effective
time of the merger. Whenever a dividend or other distribution is
declared by SBC in respect of SBC common stock, the record date
for which is after the effective time of the merger, that
declaration will include dividends or other distributions in
respect of all shares issuable pursuant to the merger agreement.
No dividends or other distributions in respect of SBC common
stock shall be paid to any holder of any unsurrendered shares of
AT&T common stock until the unsurrendered shares of AT&T
common stock are surrendered for exchange. Any holder of
unsurrendered shares of AT&T common stock will be entitled
to vote after the effective time of the merger at any meeting of
SBC stockholders the number of whole shares of SBC common stock
such holder is entitled to receive in the merger, regardless of
whether the holder shall have exchanged its shares.
In the case of any shares of AT&T common stock that are not
represented by certificates, the exchange agent will issue at
the effective time of the merger the shares of SBC common stock
to which such holders are entitled without any action by those
holders.
Adjustments to Prevent Dilution. If, between the date of
the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger,
AT&T changes the number of issued and outstanding shares of
AT&T common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable
into or exercisable for shares of AT&T common stock, or SBC
changes the number of issued and outstanding shares of SBC
common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into or
exercisable for shares of SBC common stock, as a result of a
reclassification, stock split (including a reverse stock split),
stock dividend or distribution, recapitalization, merger,
subdivision, issuer tender or exchange offer, or other similar
transaction, then the exchange ratio of 0.77942 will be
equitably adjusted.
Stock Options and Other Stock Awards. At the effective
time of the merger, each outstanding option to purchase shares
of AT&T common stock granted under AT&Ts
stock-based benefit plans and under individual employment
agreements to which AT&T is a party, whether vested or
unvested, will be converted into an option to acquire a number
of shares of SBC common stock (rounded up to the nearest whole
number) obtained by multiplying the number of shares of AT&T
common stock subject to the AT&T stock option immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio
of 0.77942. The exercise price per share (rounded down to the
nearest whole cent) will be obtained by dividing the exercise
price per AT&T share of such AT&T stock option
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger by the
exchange ratio of 0.77942. Following the effective time of the
merger, each AT&T stock option will continue to be governed
by the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the
option immediately prior to the effective time of the merger.
At the effective time of the merger, each right of any kind,
contingent or accrued, to acquire or receive shares of AT&T
common stock or benefits measured by the value of AT&T
common stock, and each award of any kind consisting of shares of
AT&T common stock that may be held, awarded, outstanding,
payable or reserved for issuance under any AT&T stock plans
or benefit plans, other than AT&T stock options, will be
deemed to be converted into the right to acquire or receive
benefits measured by the value of (as the case may be) the
number of shares of SBC common stock obtained by multiplying the
number of AT&T shares subject to such award immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger by the exchange ratio
of 0.77942, and each such right will otherwise be subject to the
terms and conditions applicable to such right under the relevant
AT&T stock plan or other benefit plan.
56
The AT&T board of directors, or its applicable committee,
will take all necessary actions to ensure that the terms of
AT&T stock options and other stock-based awards then
outstanding are equitably adjusted to take into account the
payment of the special dividend of $1.30 per share
described under Conversion of AT&T Common
Stock above.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains various representations and
warranties of AT&T, Merger Sub and SBC.
AT&T. The representations and warranties of AT&T
relate generally to:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, good standing and qualification; |
|
|
|
capital structure; |
|
|
|
corporate authority, approval and fairness matters; |
|
|
|
governmental filings, absence of violations and certain
contracts; |
|
|
|
AT&Ts SEC filings and financial statements; |
|
|
|
absence of certain changes; |
|
|
|
litigation and liabilities; |
|
|
|
employee benefit plans; |
|
|
|
compliance with laws and licenses; |
|
|
|
material contracts; |
|
|
|
real property; |
|
|
|
right-of-way agreements; |
|
|
|
takeover statutes; |
|
|
|
environmental matters; |
|
|
|
taxes; |
|
|
|
labor matters; |
|
|
|
intellectual property and IT assets; |
|
|
|
General Services Administration action; |
|
|
|
export controls and trade sanctions; |
|
|
|
foreign corrupt practices act; and |
|
|
|
brokers and finders. |
SBC and Merger Sub. The representations and warranties of
SBC and Merger Sub relate generally to:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, good standing and qualification; |
|
|
|
capital structure of SBC |
|
|
|
capital structure of Merger Sub; |
|
|
|
corporate authority, approval and fairness matters; |
|
|
|
governmental filings, absence of violations; |
|
|
|
SBC reports and financial statements; |
|
|
|
litigation and liabilities; |
57
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws; and |
|
|
|
absence of changes. |
Certain representations and warranties of AT&T and SBC are
qualified as to materiality or material adverse
effect. When used with respect to AT&T or SBC,
material adverse effect means:
|
|
|
|
|
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, assets,
liabilities, business or results of operations of AT&T or
SBC, as applicable, and its subsidiaries taken as a whole,
excluding any such effects resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
changes in political or regulatory conditions generally; |
|
|
|
changes or conditions generally affecting the U.S. economy
or financial markets or generally affecting any of the segments
of the telecommunications industry in which AT&T or SBC, as
applicable, or any of its subsidiaries operates; or |
|
|
|
the announcement or consummation of the merger agreement; or |
|
|
|
|
|
an effect that would prevent, materially delay or materially
impair the ability of AT&T or SBC, as applicable, to
consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement. |
When used with respect to AT&T, material adverse
effect excludes the effect of a decline in the revenues of
the consumer business operations of AT&T and its
subsidiaries prior to the effective time of the merger of not
more than 50% from the revenues in AT&Ts 2005 business
plan, it being understood that only the portion of any decline
in revenues in excess of 50%, if any, will be considered in
determining whether there is a material adverse effect.
Covenants and Agreements
Conduct of AT&T Pending the Merger. The merger
agreement provides that, until the termination of the merger
agreement or effective time of the merger, the business of
AT&T and its subsidiaries will be conducted in the ordinary
and usual course and, to the extent consistent therewith,
AT&T and its subsidiaries will use their respective
reasonable best efforts to preserve their business organizations
intact and maintain existing relations and goodwill with
governmental entities, customers, suppliers, distributors,
creditors, lessors, employees and business associates and keep
available the services of the present employees and agents of
AT&T and its subsidiaries. In addition, AT&T may not
knowingly take or permit any of its subsidiaries to take any
action or refrain from taking any action that would be
reasonably and foreseeable likely to prevent the consummation of
the merger by the termination date described in
Termination below.
The merger agreement also provides that, from the date of the
merger agreement until the effective time of the merger, except
as otherwise expressly required by the merger agreement or
except as SBC may approve in writing (such approval not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), and subject to certain other
exceptions, AT&T will not and will not permit its
subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
adopt or propose any change in its certificate of incorporation
or by-laws or amend any term of the AT&T shares; |
|
|
|
merge or consolidate AT&T or any of its subsidiaries with
any other person, except for any such transactions among wholly
owned subsidiaries of AT&T that are not obligors or
guarantors of third-party indebtedness, or adopt a plan of
liquidation; |
|
|
|
acquire assets outside of the ordinary course of business from
any other person with a value or purchase price in excess of
$100,000,000 in the aggregate, subject to certain exceptions; |
|
|
|
enter into any material line of business in any geographic area
other than the current lines of business of AT&T or any of
its subsidiaries, and in the geographic areas where they were
conducted as of the date of the merger agreement, or engage in
the conduct of any business in any state or foreign country |
58
|
|
|
|
|
that would require the receipt or transfer of a license from a
governmental entity, subject to certain exceptions; |
|
|
|
file for any license from a governmental entity outside of the
ordinary course of business, subject to certain exceptions; |
|
|
|
issue, sell, pledge, dispose of, grant, transfer, lease,
license, guarantee or encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale,
pledge, disposition, grant, transfer, lease, license, guarantee
or encumbrance of, any shares of capital stock of AT&T or
any of its subsidiaries, any securities convertible or
exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares of such capital
stock, or any options, warrants, conversion rights, stock
appreciation rights, redemption rights, repurchase rights,
agreements, arrangements, calls, commitments or rights to
acquire any shares of such capital stock or such convertible or
exchangeable securities, other than the issuance of shares
pursuant to AT&Ts stock plans or pursuant to
AT&Ts dividend reinvestment program; |
|
|
|
create or incur any lien material to AT&T or any of its
subsidiaries on any assets of AT&T or any of its
subsidiaries having a value in excess of $50,000,000, other than
in connection with existing receivables facilities and
securitizations and renewals thereof in the ordinary course of
business, or in connection with the refinancing of
AT&Ts indebtedness under its existing credit facility; |
|
|
|
make any loans, advances or capital contributions to or
investments in any person in excess of $25,000,000 in the
aggregate; |
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution on any
shares of AT&T common stock other than the special dividend
or AT&Ts regular quarterly dividend of $.2375 per
share in cash per quarter at record and payment dates consistent
with past practices, or any shares of capital stock of any
subsidiaries, provided that AT&T will designate the record
dates for its quarterly dividends to coincide with the record
dates for SBCs quarterly dividends, beginning with the
record date on July 10, 2005; |
|
|
|
reclassify, split, combine, subdivide or repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any of its capital stock or securities
convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares
of its capital stock; |
|
|
|
incur or guarantee any indebtedness for borrowed money or
guarantee such indebtedness of another person, or issue or sell
any debt securities or warrants or other rights to acquire any
debt security of AT&T or any of its subsidiaries, except for: |
|
|
|
|
|
indebtedness incurred in the ordinary course of business not to
exceed $100,000,000 in the aggregate, |
|
|
|
indebtedness in replacement of existing indebtedness on
customary commercial terms, |
|
|
|
guarantees by AT&T of indebtedness of its wholly owned
subsidiaries or guarantees by subsidiaries of indebtedness of
AT&T, or |
|
|
|
interest rate swaps on customary commercial terms consistent
with past practice and not to exceed $100,000,000 of notional
debt in the aggregate in addition to notional debt currently
under swap or similar arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
|
make or authorize any capital expenditure, subject to certain
exceptions; |
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course of business, enter into any
contract that would have been a material contract
for purposes of the merger agreement had it been entered into
prior to the date of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
make any changes with respect to accounting policies or
procedures, except as required by changes in generally accepted
accounting principles or by applicable law or as AT&T, based
upon the advice of its independent auditors after consultation
with SBC, determines in good faith is advisable to conform to
best accounting practices; |
59
|
|
|
|
|
settle any litigation or other proceedings before a governmental
entity for an amount to be paid by AT&T or any of its
subsidiaries greater than $50,000,000 or which would be
reasonably likely to have any adverse impact on its or its
subsidiaries operations, subject to certain tax-related
exceptions; |
|
|
|
amend or modify in any material respect, or terminate or waive
any material right or benefit under, any material contract or
cancel, modify or waive any debts or claims or waive any rights
having in each case a value in excess of $25,000,000, other than
in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
make any material tax election or take any material position on
any material tax return filed on or after the date of the merger
agreement or adopt any method that is inconsistent with
elections made, positions taken or methods used in preparing or
filing similar tax returns in prior periods, except as required
by law or by any currently effective tax sharing agreement; |
|
|
|
sell, lease, license or otherwise dispose of any assets of
AT&T or its subsidiaries except in the ordinary course of
business or obsolete assets or sales, leases, licenses or other
dispositions of assets with a fair market value of not more than
$50,000,000 in respect of any one asset and not more than
$100,000,000 in the aggregate, subject to certain exceptions; |
|
|
|
except as required by agreements in effect prior to the date of
the merger agreement or as otherwise required by applicable law: |
|
|
|
|
|
enter into any commitment to provide any severance or
termination benefits to, or amend any existing arrangement with,
any director, officer or employee of AT&T or any of its
subsidiaries, other than for severance or termination benefits
to employees (other than certain executive officers) in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and
pursuant to the terms of certain plans, programs or arrangements
in effect prior to the date of the merger agreement or except in
connection with newly hired or newly promoted employees, in each
case to the extent consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
increase the benefits payable under any existing severance or
termination benefit policy or employment agreement, other than
as required to be increased pursuant to the existing terms of
any such policy or agreement or as a result of ordinary pay
raises or promotions; |
|
|
|
enter into any employment severance, change in control,
termination, deferred compensation or other similar agreement,
or amend any such existing agreement, with any director, officer
or employee of AT&T or any of its subsidiaries other than
pursuant to the terms of any compensation or benefit plan in
effect on the date of the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
establish, adopt, amend or terminate any compensation and
benefit plan, except for technical amendments in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice that do not
materially increase the cost of such arrangements to AT&T; |
|
|
|
increase the compensation, bonus or other benefits of, make any
new awards under any compensation and benefit plan to, or pay
any bonus to any director, officer, employee, consultant or
independent contractor of AT&T or any of its subsidiaries,
except for increases, new awards or payments in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice for employees
other than certain executive officers or except in connection
with newly hired or newly promoted employees, in each case to
the extent consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
take any action to fund, secure the payment of or accelerate the
vesting or payment of compensation or benefits under any
compensation and benefit plan, except as required pursuant to
its terms; |
|
|
|
materially change any actuarial or other assumptions used to
calculate funding obligations with respect to any compensation
and benefit plan or change the manner in which contributions to
such plans are made or the basis on which such contributions are
determined, except as may be required by generally accepted
accounting principles or in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice; |
60
|
|
|
|
|
amend the terms of any outstanding equity-based award; |
|
|
|
provide for accelerated vesting, removal of restrictions or
exercisability of any stock based or stock related awards upon a
change in control occurring on or prior to the effective time of
the merger for any grants made after the date of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
exercise any discretion to cash out awards pursuant to
AT&Ts 1997 Long Term Incentive Program; or |
|
|
|
enter into any new collective bargaining agreements or
amendments to existing collective bargaining agreements except
in connection with newly hired or newly promoted employees, in
each case to the extent consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
|
|
fail to initiate appropriate steps to renew any material
governmental licenses held by AT&T or any of its
subsidiaries that are scheduled to terminate prior to or within
60 days after the effective time of the merger or to
prosecute any pending applications for any material governmental
license; or |
|
|
|
agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
Conduct of SBC Pending the Merger. The merger agreement
provides that SBC will not, and it will cause its subsidiaries
not to, enter into any agreement for the acquisition of any
business or person which provides interexchange
telecommunications or long distance services, other than the
provision of such services in de minimis amounts or any
provision of such services solely as a component of the
provision of mobile wireless voice or data services. In
addition, SBC may not knowingly take or permit any of its
subsidiaries to take any action or refrain from taking any
action that would be reasonably and foreseeable likely to
prevent the consummation of the merger by the termination date
described in Termination below.
The merger agreement also provides that, from the date of the
merger agreement until the effective time of the merger, except
as otherwise expressly required by the merger agreement or as
AT&T may approve in writing (such approval not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), SBC will not and will not
permit its subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
adopt or propose any material change in SBCs certificate
of incorporation or by-laws or amend any term of the shares of
SBC common stock; |
|
|
|
merge or consolidate SBC or Merger Sub with any other person or
adopt a plan of liquidation; |
|
|
|
enter into or acquire any new line of business that is material
to SBC and its subsidiaries taken as a whole and is not
strategically related to the current business or operations of
SBC and its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
issue, sell, pledge, dispose of, grant, transfer, lease,
license, guarantee or encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale,
pledge, disposition, grant, transfer, lease, license, guarantee
or encumbrance of, any shares of capital stock of SBC or any of
its subsidiaries, or securities convertible or exchangeable into
or exercisable for any shares of such capital stock, or any
options, warrants, conversion rights, stock appreciation rights,
redemption rights, repurchase rights, agreements, arrangements,
calls, commitments or rights to acquire any shares of such
capital stock or such convertible or exchangeable securities,
except for shares of SBC common stock issued for fair value in
arms-length transactions or in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practices pursuant to SBCs
employee benefit plans; |
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution on any
shares of SBC common stock or capital stock of any of its
subsidiaries other than by wholly owned subsidiaries and pro
rata dividends or distributions payable to holders of interests
in non wholly owned subsidiaries and other than SBCs
regular quarterly dividend, including any increases thereof, at
record and payment dates consistent with past practice; |
61
|
|
|
|
|
reclassify, split, combine or subdivide, or repurchase, redeem
or otherwise acquire at prices above fair market value any of
its capital stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into
or exercisable for any shares of its capital stock; or |
|
|
|
agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
To the extent that SBCs foregoing obligations relate to
Cingular LLC and its subsidiaries, these obligations will be
limited to taking such steps, such as the exercise of any veto
rights, that are within the unilateral power and control of SBC
and its subsidiaries (other than Cingular LLC and its
subsidiaries), and none of the foregoing obligations will
require any of SBCs representatives (or require SBC to
compel any of its representatives) to take any actions that
would violate the fiduciary duties of such representatives under
applicable law with respect to any beneficial owners of equity
securities of Cingular LLC or its affiliates other than SBC or
any of its subsidiaries.
Acquisition Proposals. The merger agreement provides that
AT&T, any of its subsidiaries or any of the officers and
directors of AT&T or any of its subsidiaries will not, and
AT&T will cause its and its subsidiaries employees,
agents and representatives, including any investment banker,
attorney or accountant retained by it or any of its
subsidiaries, not to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate any
inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer, which we refer
to as an acquisition proposal, with respect to: |
|
|
|
|
|
a merger, reorganization, share exchange, consolidation or
similar transaction involving AT&T; |
|
|
|
any purchase of an equity interest or interests representing, in
the aggregate, an amount equal to or greater than a 15% voting
or economic interest in AT&T; or |
|
|
|
any purchase of assets, securities or ownership interests
representing an amount equal to or greater than 15% of the
consolidated assets of AT&T and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
have any discussions with, or provide any confidential
information or data to, or engage in any negotiations with, any
person relating to an acquisition proposal, or otherwise
knowingly encourage or facilitate any effort or attempt by any
person other than SBC and Merger Sub to make or implement an
acquisition proposal. |
The merger agreement provides that these restrictions would not
prevent AT&T or its board of directors from complying with
its disclosure obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (which is referred to in the document as the
Exchange Act), with regard to an acquisition proposal. However,
if such disclosure has the substantive effect of withdrawing,
modifying or qualifying the recommendation of the AT&T board
of directors of the merger in a manner adverse to SBC or the
adoption of the merger agreement by the board of directors of
AT&T, SBC will have the right to terminate the merger
agreement. See Termination below.
The merger agreement also provides that the above restrictions
would not prevent AT&T or its board of directors, at any
time prior to, but not after, the time the merger agreement is
adopted by requisite vote of AT&T shareholders, from:
|
|
|
|
|
providing information in response to a request therefor by a
person who has made an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition
proposal if the AT&T board of directors receives from the
person so requesting such information an executed
confidentiality agreement (excluding standstill provisions) on
customary terms; |
|
|
|
engaging in any discussions or negotiations with any person who
has made an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal
if the AT&T board of directors receives from such person an
executed confidentiality agreement (excluding standstill
provisions) on customary terms; or |
|
|
|
recommending or agreeing to recommend such an unsolicited bona
fide written acquisition proposal to the AT&T shareholders; |
62
if and only to the extent that:
|
|
|
|
|
in each such case referred to in the three bullet points of the
previous paragraph, the AT&T board of directors determines
in good faith after consultation with outside legal counsel that
such action is necessary in order for its directors to comply
with their fiduciary duties under applicable law; |
|
|
|
in the case referred to in the last two bullet points of the
previous paragraph, the AT&T board of directors determines
in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and
outside counsel, taking into account all legal, financial and
regulatory aspects of the proposal, the likelihood of obtaining
financing, and the person making the proposal, that such
acquisition proposal (which must involve at least 50% of the
assets or equity securities of AT&T), if consummated, is
more favorable, from a financial point of view, taking into
account the likelihood of consummation, to AT&Ts
shareholders than the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, in each case taking into account any revisions to the
terms of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
(any such more favorable acquisition proposal is referred to in
this document as a superior proposal); and |
|
|
|
in the case referred to in the last bullet point of the previous
paragraph, SBC must have had written notice of AT&Ts
intention to take the action referred to that bullet point at
least five business days prior to the taking of such action by
AT&T and AT&T has complied with the following paragraph. |
AT&T has agreed that it does not consider that Verizon
Communications, Inc. would be more likely than SBC to obtain the
regulatory approvals required to consummate an acquisition of
AT&T, or to obtain those regulatory approvals more quickly.
AT&Ts agreement is based upon and assumes that there
is no material change in Verizons business or in the
information available to AT&T with respect to that business
and that Verizon would not be willing to assume materially
greater contractual obligations or risk with respect to
obtaining regulatory approvals than SBC has assumed in the
merger agreement.
The merger agreement provides that AT&T must notify SBC as
promptly as practicable (and, in any event, within
24 hours) if any inquiries, proposals or offers with
respect to any acquisition proposal or potential acquisition
proposal are received by, any such information is requested
from, or any such discussions or negotiations are sought to be
initiated or continued with, it or any of its representatives,
indicating, in connection with such notice, the name of such
person and the material terms and conditions of any proposal or
offer and thereafter shall keep SBC informed, on a current
basis, on the status and terms of any such proposal or offer and
the status of any such discussions or negotiations.
The merger agreement further provides that during the
five-business day period prior to its recommending an
acquisition proposal to AT&Ts shareholders, AT&T
and its representatives will negotiate in good faith with SBC
and its representatives regarding any revisions to the terms of
the transaction contemplated by the merger agreement proposed by
SBC and that AT&T may take any such action with respect to
an acquisition proposal that is a superior proposal only if it
continues to be a superior proposal in light of any revisions to
the terms of the transaction contemplated by the merger
agreement to which SBC may have agreed prior to the expiration
of the five business day period. No acquisition proposal will be
deemed to be a superior proposal if SBC will have agreed to
revisions to the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and the AT&T board of directors will not have
reasonably determined in good faith that the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement as so revised are not
substantially equivalent to or better than such acquisition
proposal, from a financial point of view, taking into account
the likelihood of consummation, to AT&Ts shareholders.
AT&T will deliver to SBC a new notice of superior proposal
with respect to each acquisition proposal that has been
materially revised or modified prior to taking any action to
recommend or agreeing to recommend such acquisition proposal to
AT&Ts shareholders and that a new five business-day
period will commence with respect to each such materially
revised or modified acquisition proposal from the time SBC
receives a notice of superior proposal with respect thereto.
AT&T will provide any information to SBC that it is
providing to another person in connection with an acquisition
proposal as permitted by the merger agreement at the same time
it provides it to such other person.
63
The merger agreement provides that AT&T must immediately
cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities,
discussions or negotiations with any person conducted with
respect to any acquisition proposal. AT&T must promptly
request each person that has executed a confidentiality
agreement in connection with its consideration of a transaction
with AT&T to return or destroy all confidential information
furnished prior to the execution of the merger agreement to or
for the benefit of such person by or on behalf of AT&T or
any of its subsidiaries. AT&T must take the necessary steps
to promptly inform its representatives of the obligations
undertaken with respect to acquisition proposals.
Shareholders Meeting. The merger agreement requires
AT&T to call and hold a shareholders meeting to vote upon
the adoption of the merger agreement as promptly as practicable
after the date the registration statement of which this document
forms a part became effective and in any event within
120 days after the date of the merger agreement (or, if
later, not more than 60 days after the date of this
document). Additionally, subject to specified conditions related
to its fiduciary duties, the board of directors of AT&T has
agreed to recommend that stockholders tender their shares in the
offer and vote in favor of the merger agreement.
Reasonable Best Efforts. Each of AT&T, SBC and their
respective subsidiaries will use their reasonable best efforts
to take all necessary actions to comply with all legal
requirements which may be imposed on that party with respect to
the merger and to consummate the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement as soon as practicable, including making
any necessary filings with governmental entities, and obtaining
all necessary or advisable consents, registrations, approvals,
permits and authorizations from any third parties and/or
governmental entities, as soon as practicable. However, in
connection with using their reasonable best efforts, the parties
will not be required to take or refrain from taking any action,
or to agree to any restriction with respect to any assets or
operations of the parties or their respective subsidiaries, that
would take effect prior to the effective time of the merger or
would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect
on AT&T or a specified material adverse effect (as defined
below) on SBC and its subsidiaries following the effective time
of the merger. If any lawsuits or other legal proceedings
challenge the consummation of the merger or other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, AT&T and SBC agree to
use their reasonable best efforts to resolve any such challenges.
For purposes of the merger agreement, a specified material
adverse effect is generally defined as a material adverse effect
on AT&T and its subsidiaries, or on SBC and its subsidiaries
following the effective time of the merger (with materiality
considered by reference to the properties, assets, liabilities,
business and results of operations of AT&T and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, rather than that of SBC and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole), in each case applying the
following principles:
|
|
|
|
|
both the positive and negative effects of any required
divestiture or other required action, restriction or agreement
referred to in the preceding paragraph will be taken into
account (subject to the following two bullet points); |
|
|
|
any required divestiture of any of the consumer business
operations of AT&T or its subsidiaries, or of any fiber
optic facilities used by AT&T or its subsidiaries to provide
exchange access or local exchange services that compete with
SBCs fiber optic facilities in SBCs region (up to an
aggregate net negative effect of $100 million from the
divestiture of these fiber optic facilities), will be deemed to
have a net effect of zero, and |
|
|
|
the loss of any synergies anticipated by SBC from the merger
with respect to any divestiture required by the FCC or DOJ in
order to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will not be taken into account. |
For purposes of the above principles, SBCs
region includes those portions of the States of Texas,
Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, California, Nevada,
Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin and Connecticut in
which SBC or one of its subsidiaries is an incumbent local
exchange carrier, as defined in the Telecommunications Act of
1934, as amended, and net negative effect means the
aggregate negative economic effects, net of any positive
effects, on the value of the assets, business or operations of
SBC and its subsidiaries after the effective time of the merger
from the divestiture of any fiber optic facilities referred to
in the second bullet point above.
64
Notice and Access to Information. The parties have agreed
to notify each other of certain written communications, notices
and proceedings related to the merger. In addition, AT&T has
agreed to provide SBC with reasonable access to its and its
subsidiaries information concerning its and its
subsidiaries business, properties and personnel as may
reasonably be requested.
Publicity. AT&T and SBC have agreed to consult with
each other prior to issuing any press releases or public
announcements with respect to the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement and prior to making any filings with any
third party or governmental entity with respect thereto, except
as may be required by applicable law or by obligations pursuant
to any listing agreement with or rules of any national
securities exchange or by the request of any governmental entity.
Employee Matters. SBC has agreed that, from the effective
time of the merger through the first anniversary of the last day
of the plan year of each compensation and benefit plan in which
the effective time of the merger occurs, those individuals who
were employees or former employees of AT&T and its
subsidiaries at the effective time of the merger will be
provided compensation and employee benefits, other than plans
involving the issuance of shares of AT&T common stock and
payments or benefits made by reason of, or any increase in value
attributable to, the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, no less favorable than those provided to those
employees prior to the effective time of the merger. In
addition, until the second anniversary of the effective time of
the merger, SBC will and will cause the surviving corporation to
continue several of AT&Ts severance plans (to the
extent required under each of the severance plans). SBC has also
agreed to waive pre-existing conditions exclusions, waiting
periods and certain other requirements, provide credit for
co-payments and deductibles paid and generally recognize prior
service with AT&T for purposes of SBCs benefit plans
(other than for purposes of benefit accrual under defined
benefit pension or retirement plans or for new programs for
which credit for benefit accrual is not given to similarly
situated employees of SBC).
SBC has agreed that it will and will cause the surviving
corporation and its subsidiaries to honor the terms of any
collective bargaining agreements to which AT&T and its
subsidiaries are a party.
AT&T and SBC have agreed that, prior to the consummation of
the merger, AT&T will establish a retention bonus pool
designed to retain certain key employees of AT&T through the
transition period between the announcement of the merger and a
period following the consummation of the merger. Participants in
the retention pool will be selected by AT&T in consultation
with SBC, although the final selections will be made in the sole
discretion of AT&T and in no event will members of
AT&Ts executive committee be eligible to participate.
The aggregate amount of the retention pool will be up to
$100,000,000. Individual retention bonus amounts generally will
range between one and three times the participants annual
base salary depending upon the participants position and
will be paid to participants on a date established by AT&T
which may be no earlier than six months following the closing of
the merger or on such earlier date as the participants
employment is terminated by AT&T or SBC without cause or a
constructive termination of the participant for good reason.
Fees and Expenses. Whether or not the merger is
consummated, except as otherwise agreed by the parties, the
parties will pay all of their own costs and expenses incurred in
connection with the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
Indemnification and Directors and Officers
Insurance. SBC and AT&T have agreed to indemnify and
hold harmless the directors and officers of AT&T and its
subsidiaries for costs arising out of matters existing or
occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger. The
surviving corporation has agreed to maintain directors and
officers liability insurance for six years following the
effective time of the merger.
Regulatory Compliance. AT&T and each of its
subsidiaries agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
cure any material violations and defaults by any of them under
any applicable rules and regulations of the FCC or the Federal
Aviation Administration, which is referred to as the FAA in this
document, no later than the effective time of the merger; |
65
|
|
|
|
|
comply in all material respects with the terms of, and make all
necessary filings under, AT&Ts FCC licenses and the
FAA rules; and |
|
|
|
take all actions reasonably requested in writing by SBC for each
of them to be in compliance effective upon the closing of the
merger with the provisions of Sections 271 and 272 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended. SBC has agreed to
reimburse AT&T for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses it
incurs at SBCs request to comply with this requirement. |
Neither AT&T nor its subsidiaries will be required to cure
any alleged material violation or default with any applicable
rule or regulation of the FCC or the FAA for any matter until
there is a final and nonappealable order or decision holding
that AT&T or its subsidiary is in material violation or
default of the applicable rule or regulation.
Potential Sale of AT&Ts Assets. Between the
date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the
merger, AT&T and its subsidiaries must cooperate with SBC to
facilitate the disposition of certain agreed upon assets or
ownership interests or assets or ownership interests which are
inconsistent with SBCs strategic objectives and the value
of which in the aggregate does not exceed $100,000,000.
AT&T and its subsidiaries will use their reasonable best
efforts to permit potential purchasers of those potential sale
interests to conduct reasonable investigations, comply with any
applicable right of first refusal, right of first offer, right
of approval or similar provisions that may be applicable and to
deliver notices, make filings and execute contracts in
connection with such potential sale interests, as reasonably
requested by SBC.
AT&T and its subsidiaries will not be required to execute
any contract requiring AT&T or any of its subsidiaries to
dispose of any such potential sale interests, or to agree to
restrictions on their businesses or operations, prior to the
effective time of the merger. SBC may identify potential
purchasers of potential sale interests and negotiate contracts
selling those interests. AT&T may and, to the extent
reasonably requested by SBC, will participate in such
negotiations. SBC will reimburse AT&T and its subsidiaries
for their reasonable costs in complying with their obligations
with respect to potential sale interests.
Special Dividend. Following the date of the adoption of
the merger agreement by holders of AT&T shares constituting
the requisite vote at the stockholders meeting and prior to the
effective time of the merger, AT&T will declare and pay a
special dividend of $1.30 per share payable to holders of
record of outstanding shares of AT&T common stock as of a
record date set by the AT&T board of directors, to be
payable no later than the effective time of the merger. Subject
to applicable law, AT&T will use its reasonable best efforts
to cause the special dividend to be paid prior to the effective
time on the closing date of the merger. AT&T does not
intend to pay the special dividend unless the merger is to be
completed.
Conditions to the Merger
Conditions to Each Partys Obligations to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligation of each of SBC, Merger Sub
and AT&T to complete the merger is conditioned upon the
satisfaction or waiver prior to the effective time of the merger
of each of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement will have been duly adopted by holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of AT&T common stock
entitled to vote on the matter in accordance with applicable law
and AT&Ts certificate of incorporation and by-laws; |
|
|
|
the waiting period applicable to the consummation of the merger
under the HSR Act will have expired or been earlier terminated; |
|
|
|
|
if applicable, the European Commission, or a governmental entity
of a member state of the European Union, as applicable, will
have granted approval of the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
|
all approvals and authorizations required to be obtained in
respect of AT&Ts communications licenses and from
foreign and other governmental entities for the consummation of
the merger will have been obtained (subject to certain
exceptions); |
66
|
|
|
|
|
no governmental entity of competent jurisdiction will have
enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any order or
law that is in effect and restrains, enjoins or otherwise
prohibits consummation of the merger or the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, except for orders of
governmental entities outside the United States as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have
a specified material adverse effect (as defined under
Covenants and Agreements Reasonable Best
Efforts above) and which do not provide a reasonable basis
to conclude that the AT&T, SBC or their respective directors
or officers would be subject to the risk of criminal liability; |
|
|
|
the registration statement of which this document forms a part
will have been declared effective by the SEC under the
Securities Act and no stop order suspending its effectiveness
will have been issued by the SEC and no proceedings for that
purpose will have been initiated or threatened by the
SEC; and |
|
|
|
the shares of SBC common stock to be issued in the merger will
have been authorized for listing on the NYSE upon official
notice of issuance. |
Conditions to Obligations of SBC and Merger Sub. The
obligations of SBC and Merger Sub to effect the merger are
subject to the satisfaction or waiver by SBC at or prior to the
effective time of the merger of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
certain specified representations and warranties made by
AT&T in the merger agreement will be true and correct in all
material respects as of the date of the merger agreement and as
of the closing date as though made on and as of the closing date
(except to the extent any such representation and warranty
expressly speaks as of an earlier date, in which case such
representation and warranty shall be true and correct as of such
earlier date); any failure of any of the other representations
and warranties made by AT&T in the merger agreement, without
giving effect to any materiality or material adverse effect
qualifications contained therein, individually or in the
aggregate, to be true and correct as of the date of the merger
agreement and as of the closing date as though made on and as of
the closing date (except to the extent any such representation
and warranty expressly speaks as of an earlier date, in which
case such representation and warranty shall be true and correct
as of such earlier date) will not have had, or reasonably be
expected to have, a material adverse effect; and SBC will have
received a certificate as to the foregoing from the chief
executive officer or chief financial officer of AT&T; |
|
|
|
AT&T will have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement at or prior to the closing date, and SBC will have
received a certificate to such effect from the chief executive
officer or chief financial officer of AT&T; |
|
|
|
|
no governmental entity of competent jurisdiction will have
instituted (or if instituted, will not have withdrawn) any
proceeding seeking any order that restrains, enjoins or
otherwise prohibits the consummation of the merger or the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and no
governmental entity will have instituted any civil, criminal or
administrative action, suit, claim, hearing, investigation or
other proceeding the existence of which would, in the reasonable
judgment of SBC, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably
likely to result in the failure of the condition described in
the fifth bullet point under Conditions to
the Merger Conditions to Each Partys
Obligation to Effect the Merger above; |
|
|
|
|
All governmental consents will have been made or obtained
(subject to certain exceptions). All governmental consents that
have been obtained will have been obtained without the
imposition of any term, condition or consequence the acceptance
of which would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have or result in a specified material adverse
effect (as defined in the merger agreement) and all required
governmental consents obtained from the FCC shall have been
obtained by a final order; |
|
|
|
AT&T will have obtained the consent or approval of each
person whose consent or approval will be required under any
material contract to which AT&T or any of its subsidiaries
is a party in connection with the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement (subject to certain exceptions), except |
67
|
|
|
|
|
where the failure to obtain such consent or approval,
individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be
expected to result in a material adverse effect; and |
|
|
|
SBC will have received the opinion of Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, counsel to SBC, dated the closing date, to the
effect that the merger will be treated for federal income tax
purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and that each of SBC, Merger
Sub and AT&T will be a party to that reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. |
Conditions to Obligations of AT&T. The obligation of
AT&T to effect the merger is also subject to the
satisfaction or waiver by AT&T at or prior to the effective
time of the merger of the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
certain specified representations and warranties made by SBC and
Merger Sub in the merger agreement will be true and correct in
all material respects as of the date of the merger agreement and
as of the closing date as though made on and as of the closing
date (except to the extent any such representation and warranty
expressly speaks as of an earlier date, in which case such
representation and warranty shall be true and correct as of such
earlier date); any failure of any of the other representations
and warranties made by SBC and Merger Sub in the merger
agreement, without giving effect to any materiality or material
adverse effect qualifications contained therein, individually or
in the aggregate, to be true and correct as of the date of the
merger agreement and as of the closing date as though made on
and as of the closing date (except to the extent any such
representation and warranty expressly speaks as of an earlier
date, in which case such representation and warranty will be
true and correct as of such earlier date), will not have had, or
reasonably be expected to have, an SBC material adverse effect;
and AT&T will have received a certificate as to the
foregoing from the chief executive officer or chief financial
officer of SBC. |
|
|
|
Each of SBC and Merger Sub will have performed in all material
respects all obligations required to be performed by it under
the merger agreement at or prior to the closing date, and
AT&T will have received a certificate to such effect from
the chief executive officer or chief financial officer of SBC on
behalf of SBC and Merger Sub; and |
|
|
|
AT&T will have received the opinion of Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, counsel to AT&T, dated the closing
date, to the effect that the merger will be treated for federal
income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and that each of SBC, Merger
Sub and AT&T will be a party to that reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code. |
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be
abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger,
whether before or after the adoption of the merger agreement by
AT&Ts shareholders, by action taken by the board of
directors of the terminating party or parties:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of AT&T and SBC; |
|
|
|
by either AT&T or SBC if: |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is not consummated by January 31, 2006, unless
the closing conditions with respect to certain orders of
governmental entities and required governmental consents have
not been satisfied by January 31, 2006, in which case the
termination date may be extended from time to time by SBC or
AT&T one or more times to a date not beyond July 31,
2006, provided that if the closing condition with respect to
governmental consents has not been satisfied solely by reason of
a required governmental consent that has been obtained but is
not yet a final order, neither party may terminate the merger
agreement prior to the 60th day after receipt of such required
governmental consent; |
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by AT&T shareholders
was not obtained at the shareholders meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of such meeting; or |
68
|
|
|
|
|
any order of a governmental entity permanently restraining,
enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the
merger becomes final and non-appealable, except for any orders
the existence of which would not result in the failure of the
closing condition described in the fifth bullet point under
Conditions to the Merger
Conditions to Each Partys Obligations to Effect the
Merger above. |
The foregoing rights to terminate the merger agreement will not
be available to any party that has breached its obligations
under the merger agreement in any manner that will have
proximately contributed to the occurrence of the failure of a
condition to the consummation of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the AT&T board of directors authorizes AT&T, subject to
complying with the terms of the merger agreement, to enter into
a binding written agreement concerning a transaction that
constitutes a superior proposal and AT&T prior to such
termination pays to SBC in immediately available funds the
termination fee; or |
|
|
|
there has been a breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement made by SBC or Merger Sub in the merger
agreement, or any such representation or warranty becomes untrue
or incorrect after the execution of the merger agreement, such
that closing conditions to AT&Ts obligation to effect
the merger would not be satisfied and such breach or failure to
be true and correct is not curable by the termination date. |
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of AT&T has withdrawn, modified or
qualified, or has agreed to withdraw, modify or qualify, in fact
or in substance, its adoption of the merger agreement or its
recommendation of the merger in a manner adverse to SBC; |
|
|
|
there has been a breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant or agreement made by AT&T, or any such
representation or warranty has become untrue or incorrect after
the execution of the merger agreement, such that closing
conditions to SBCs obligation to effect to merger would
not be satisfied and such breach or failure to be true or
correct is not curable by the termination date; |
|
|
|
by the later of 120 days after the date of the merger
agreement or 60 days after effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this document forms a part,
AT&Ts shareholders meeting has not been held, or the
vote of AT&Ts shareholders has not been taken, unless
AT&T has used its reasonable best efforts to convene the
shareholders meeting and hold such vote by the later of such
dates; or |
|
|
|
AT&T has knowingly and materially and not inadvertently
breached its obligations under the merger agreement relating to
acquisition proposals. |
Effect of Termination
If the merger agreement is terminated and the merger is
abandoned as described above, the merger agreement will be void
and of no effect, with no liability on the part of any party to
the merger agreement, other than for damages resulting from
willful or intentional breach of any covenant in the merger
agreement.
Termination Fees and Expenses
AT&T will promptly, but in no event later than two days
after the date of termination, pay to SBC a termination fee of
$560,000,000 and all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by SBC and
Merger Sub in connection with the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement up to a
maximum of $40,000,000, if:
|
|
|
|
|
a bona fide acquisition proposal, but substituting 40% for the
15% thresholds described under Covenants and
Agreements Acquisition Proposals above, has
been made to AT&T or any of its subsidiaries or its
shareholders and such proposal becomes publicly known, or any
person publicly |
69
|
|
|
|
|
announces an intention, whether or not conditional, to make such
a proposal with respect to AT&T or any of its subsidiaries,
and such proposal or announced intention are not withdrawn at
the time of the AT&T shareholders meeting, and: |
|
|
|
|
|
either SBC or AT&T terminates the merger agreement because
the adoption of the merger agreement by AT&T shareholders
was not obtained at the shareholders meeting or at any
adjournment or postponement of such meeting, or |
|
|
|
SBC terminates the merger agreement because by the later of
120 days after the date of the merger agreement or
60 days after effectiveness of the registration statement
of which this document forms a part, AT&Ts
shareholders meeting has not been held, or the vote of
AT&Ts shareholders has not been taken (unless AT&T
has used its reasonable best efforts to convene the shareholders
meeting and hold the vote by the later of those dates); |
|
|
|
|
|
SBC terminates the merger agreement because the board of
directors of AT&T has withdrawn, modified or qualified, or
has agreed to withdraw, modify or qualify, in fact or in
substance, its adoption of the merger agreement or its
recommendation of the merger in a manner adverse to SBC and, at
the time of the withdrawal, modification or qualification of the
adoption of the merger agreement or the recommendation of the
merger (or the agreement to do so), a bona fide acquisition
proposal described in the preceding bullet point (or any bona
fide indication of interest that is reasonably capable of
becoming such a bona fide acquisition proposal) has been made to
AT&T or any of its subsidiaries or its shareholders,
directly or indirectly through any representatives of AT&T,
or any person has publicly announced an intention (whether or
not conditional) to make such a bona fide acquisition proposal
with respect to AT&T or any of its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
SBC terminates the merger agreement because AT&T knowingly
and materially and not inadvertently breaches its obligations
under the merger agreement relating to acquisition
proposals; or |
|
|
|
AT&T terminates the merger agreement because its board of
directors authorizes AT&T to enter into a binding written
agreement concerning a transaction that constitutes a superior
proposal. |
No termination fee will be payable to SBC in the case described
in the first of the four bullet points above unless and until:
|
|
|
|
|
any person other than SBC has acquired, by purchase, sale,
assignment, lease, transfer or otherwise, in one transaction or
any series of related transactions, within 15 months of
such termination, a majority of the voting power of
AT&Ts outstanding securities or all or substantially
all of the assets of AT&T or has entered into an agreement
with AT&T for such an acquisition within 15 months of
such termination; or |
|
|
|
a merger, consolidation or similar business combination has been
consummated between AT&T or one of its subsidiaries and such
an acquiring party within such 15 month period. |
If AT&T fails to promptly pay the termination fee and
related expenses and, in order to obtain such payment, SBC or
Merger Sub commences a lawsuit which results in judgment against
AT&T for such fee or related expenses, then AT&T will
pay SBC or Merger Sub its costs and expenses, including
attorneys fees, in connection with such lawsuit with
interest on the delinquent termination fee at Citibanks
prime rate effective at the time the termination fee was due. If
the termination fee and/or out-of-pocket expenses are paid by
AT&T, such amounts will be SBCs and Merger Subs
sole and exclusive remedy for monetary damages under the merger
agreement.
Amendment, Extension and Waiver
At any time prior to the effective time of the merger, the
parties to the merger agreement may modify or amend the merger
agreement by written agreement executed and delivered by duly
authorized officers of the respective parties. The conditions to
each of the parties obligations to consummate the merger
may be waived by such party in whole or in part to the extent
permitted by applicable laws.
70
THE COMPANIES
AT&T
AT&T was incorporated in 1885 under the laws of the State of
New York. Its principal executive offices are at One AT&T
Way, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 and its telephone number at
that address is 908-221-2000. AT&T maintains an internet
website at www.att.com.
For more than a century, AT&T has been known for quality and
reliability in communications. Backed by the research and
development capabilities of AT&T Labs, AT&T is a global
leader in local, long distance, internet and transaction-based
voice and data services. Its primary business segments are
AT&T Business Services and AT&T Consumer Services.
AT&T is one of the nations largest business services
communications providers, offering a variety of global
communications services to over 2 million customers,
including large domestic and multinational businesses, small and
medium-sized businesses and government agencies. AT&T
operates one of the largest telecommunications networks in the
United States and, through its Global Network Services, provides
an array of services and customized solutions in
60 countries and 850 cities worldwide.
AT&T provides a broad range of communications services and
customized solutions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
domestic and international long distance and toll-free voice
services; |
|
|
|
local services, including switched and private line voice, local
data and special access services; |
|
|
|
domestic and international data and internet protocol (IP)
services for a variety of network standards, including frame
relay and asynchronous transfer mode (ATM); |
|
|
|
managed networking services and outsourcing solutions; and |
|
|
|
domestic and international wholesale transport services. |
AT&T is also a provider of domestic and international long
distance and transaction based communications services to over
24 million residential stand alone long distance and
bundled consumers in the U.S. AT&T provides a broad
range of communications services to consumers individually and
in combination with other services, including:
|
|
|
|
|
domestic and international long distance; |
|
|
|
voice over internet protocol (VoIP); |
|
|
|
transaction-based communications services, such as
operator-assisted calling services and prepaid phone cards; |
|
|
|
local calling; and |
|
|
|
internet service through AT&T Worldnet® service and
AT&T digital subscriber line (DSL) service. |
SBC
SBC is a holding company incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware in 1983 and has its principal executive
offices at 175 E. Houston, San Antonio, Texas
78205-2233 (telephone number 210-821-4105). SBC maintains an
internet website at www.sbc.com.
SBC was formed as one of several regional holding companies
created to hold AT&Ts local telephone companies. On
January 1, 1984, SBC was spun off from AT&T pursuant to
an antitrust consent decree, becoming an independent publicly
traded telecommunications services provider. At formation, SBC
primarily operated in five southwestern states. Its subsidiaries
merged with Pacific Telesis Group in 1997, Southern New England
Telecommunications Corporation in 1998 and Ameritech Corporation
in 1999, thereby expanding its wireline operations as the
incumbent local exchange carrier into a total of 13 states.
Its services and products are marketed under the SBC brand name
as well as several other brands including Cingular Wireless,
through
71
its joint venture with BellSouth Corporation; SBC Yahoo! through
its alliance with Yahoo, Inc (Yahoo!); and SBCGDish Network
through its agreement with EchoStar Communications Corp.
SBC ranks among the largest providers of telecommunications
services in the U.S. and the world. Through its subsidiaries and
affiliates, it provides communications services and products in
the U.S. and has investments in more than 14 countries. It
offers its services and products to businesses and consumers, as
well as other providers of telecommunications services.
The services and products that it offers vary by market, and
include: local exchange services, wireless communications,
long-distance services, internet services, telecommunications
equipment, and directory advertising and publishing. In the
first quarter of 2004, SBC began offering satellite television
services through its agreement with EchoStar. SBC groups its
operating subsidiaries as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
wireline subsidiaries, providing primarily land and wire based
services; |
|
|
|
wireless subsidiaries, holding its investment in Cingular
Wireless, which provides primarily radio-wave based services; |
|
|
|
directory subsidiaries, providing services related to directory
advertising and publishing; |
|
|
|
international subsidiaries, holding investments in primarily
foreign entities outside of the U.S.; and |
|
|
|
other subsidiaries, providing primarily corporate operations. |
72
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
presented below are derived from the historical consolidated
financial statements of SBC and AT&T. The Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements are prepared using
the purchase method of accounting, with SBC treated as the
acquirer and as if the acquisition of AT&T had been
completed on January 1, 2004 for statement of income
purposes and on December 31, 2004 for balance sheet
purposes. For a summary of the business combination, see
The Merger beginning on page 24.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
are based upon the historical financial statements of SBC and
AT&T adjusted to give effect to the AT&T acquisition.
The pro forma amounts have been developed from (a) the
audited consolidated financial statements of SBC contained in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, which are incorporated by reference in
this document, and (b) the audited consolidated financial
statements of AT&T contained in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which
are incorporated by reference in this document.
As of the date of this document, SBC has not performed the
detailed valuation studies necessary to arrive at the required
estimates of the fair market value of the AT&T assets to be
acquired and the AT&T liabilities to be assumed and the
related allocations of purchase price, nor has it identified the
adjustments necessary, if any, to conform AT&T data to
SBCs accounting policies. However, as indicated in
Note 2 to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements, SBC has made certain adjustments to the
historical book values of the assets and liabilities of AT&T
to reflect certain preliminary estimates of the fair values
necessary to prepare the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements, with the excess of the purchase price over
the historical net assets of AT&T, as adjusted to reflect
estimated fair values, recorded as goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangibles. Actual results may differ from these Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements once SBC has
determined the final purchase price for AT&T and has
completed the valuation studies necessary to finalize the
required purchase price allocations and identified any necessary
conforming accounting changes for AT&T. There can be no
assurance that such finalization will not result in material
changes.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not purport
to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations
or the consolidated financial position of SBC would have been
had the AT&T acquisition occurred on the dates assumed, nor
are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results
of operations or consolidated financial position.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
do not include the realization of cost savings from operating
efficiencies, revenue synergies or restructuring costs expected
to result from the AT&T acquisition. Specifically, the
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements do
not reflect any impact of a retention pool that AT&T will
establish prior to the consummation of the merger, which is
designed to retain certain key employees of AT&T through the
transition period between the announcement of the merger and a
period following the consummation of the merger. The aggregate
amount of the retention pool is up to $100 million. For
further information, see The Merger Interests
of AT&T Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger Retention Program.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
should be read in conjunction with the separate historical
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of SBC
and AT&T that are incorporated by reference in this document.
73
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SBC | |
|
AT&T | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
$ |
40,787 |
|
|
$ |
30,537 |
|
|
$ |
(1,839 |
)(c) |
|
$ |
69,485 |
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
separately below)
|
|
|
17,383 |
|
|
|
17,528 |
|
|
|
(1,839 |
)(c) |
|
|
32,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
(194 |
)(d) |
|
|
16,302 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,564 |
|
|
|
3,768 |
|
|
|
500 |
(b5) |
|
|
10,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,080 |
)(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
)(h) |
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment and net restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,772 |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
|
|
12,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
34,886 |
|
|
|
40,625 |
|
|
|
(2,838 |
) |
|
|
72,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
5,901 |
|
|
|
(10,088 |
) |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
(3,188 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
(152 |
)(e) |
|
|
1,674 |
|
Other income (expense) net
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
7,165 |
|
|
|
(11,029 |
) |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
(2,713 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
(4,560 |
) |
|
|
438 |
(i) |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
4,979 |
|
|
$ |
(6,469 |
) |
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
(777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
(8.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
)(f) |
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (000,000)
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
(8.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
)(f) |
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding with Dilution
(000,000)
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.
74
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2004
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
SBC | |
|
AT&T | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
3,698 |
|
|
$ |
(1,038 |
) (a) |
|
$ |
3,420 |
|
Accounts receivable net
|
|
|
5,480 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,301 |
|
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
16,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment Net
|
|
|
50,046 |
|
|
|
11,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Net
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
17,828 |
(b5) |
|
|
19,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,263 |
)(b5) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in Equity Affiliates
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
Investment in and Advances to Cingular Wireless
|
|
|
33,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,687 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
12,718 |
|
|
|
6,645 |
|
|
|
(851 |
)(b2) |
|
|
18,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
108,844 |
|
|
$ |
32,804 |
|
|
$ |
10,676 |
|
|
$ |
152,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt maturing within one year
|
|
$ |
5,734 |
|
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,620 |
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
18,934 |
|
|
|
9,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,022 |
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
21,231 |
|
|
|
8,779 |
|
|
|
958 |
(b3) |
|
|
30,968 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
28,175 |
|
|
|
7,918 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
(b2) |
|
|
37,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
49,406 |
|
|
|
16,697 |
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
68,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
(799 |
)(b4) |
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
(b1) |
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
12,804 |
|
|
|
27,170 |
|
|
|
(26,132 |
)(b4) |
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,235 |
(b1) |
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
|
|
29,352 |
|
|
|
(21,180 |
) |
|
|
21,180 |
(b4) |
|
|
29,352 |
|
Treasury shares (at cost)
|
|
|
(4,535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,535 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
(230 |
)(b4) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
40,504 |
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
7,838 |
|
|
|
55,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$ |
108,844 |
|
|
$ |
32,804 |
|
|
$ |
10,676 |
|
|
$ |
152,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.
75
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements
($ in millions, except per share data)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements present the pro forma consolidated
financial position and results of operations of the combined
company based upon the historical financial statements of SBC
and AT&T, after giving effect to the merger and adjustments
described in these footnotes, and are intended to reflect the
impact of the pending AT&T acquisition on SBC. On
January 31, 2005, SBC and AT&T jointly announced the
execution of the merger agreement, pursuant to which SBC would
acquire AT&T in a transaction in which each share of
AT&T common stock, par value of $1.00, would be converted
into and exchanged for 0.77942 of a share of SBC common stock
(equivalent to approximately 622 million shares, or 19% of
the shares of SBC common stock that were outstanding at
December 31, 2004). Based on the average closing price of
SBC common stock for the two days prior to, including, and two
days subsequent to the public announcement of the merger
(January 31, 2005) of $23.87, the purchase price would be
approximately $14,857. After the AT&T acquisition, AT&T
will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBC. The transaction has
been approved by the board of directors of each company and also
must be approved by the shareholders of AT&T. The
transaction is subject to review and approval by the DOJ, FCC
and various other regulatory authorities.
The accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements are presented for illustrative purposes
only and do not give effect to any cost savings, revenue
synergies or restructuring costs which may result from the
integration of SBCs and AT&Ts operations.
Specifically, the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements do not reflect any impact of a retention
pool that AT&T will establish prior to the consummation of
the merger, which is designed to retain certain key employees of
AT&T through the transition period between the announcement
of the merger and a period following the consummation of the
merger. The aggregate amount of the retention pool is up to
$100. For further information, see The Merger
Interests of AT&T Executive Officers and Directors in the
Merger Retention Program. Additionally, the
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements do
not include any transaction costs relating to the merger that
will be included by SBC as part of the purchase price (as those
amounts are anticipated to be immaterial to the total purchase
price). For more information on estimated cost savings and
revenue synergies, see The
Merger SBCs Reasons for the Merger
on page 27 and The Merger AT&Ts
Reasons for the Merger on page 30. The Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Balance Sheet reflects the merger as if it had been
effective on December 31, 2004. The Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Condensed Statement of Income reflects the merger as if
it had been in effect on January 1, 2004.
Note 2. Pro Forma Adjustments
|
|
(a) |
The Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet has been adjusted
to record the special dividend of $1.30 per share to be paid by
AT&T to AT&T shareholders prior to the closing of the
merger. For purposes of the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Balance Sheet, the dividend is calculated based on
799 million AT&T shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2004. However, the actual dividend paid will
be based on AT&T shares outstanding on the record date for
payment of the dividend. |
76
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
(b) |
This entry reflects the preliminary allocation of the purchase
price to identifiable net assets acquired and the excess
purchase price to Goodwill and Other
Intangibles Net as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total consideration: Issuance of SBC common stock to AT&T
shareholders
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
$ |
14,235 |
|
|
$ |
14,857 |
(b1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary estimate of fair value of identifiable net
assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT&Ts equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,019 |
|
Special dividend to AT&T shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,038 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT&Ts adjusted equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,981 |
(b4) |
Elimination of AT&T goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,263 |
)(b5) |
Preliminary estimate of fair value adjustment of AT&T
long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958 |
)(b3) |
Preliminary estimate of fair value adjustment to AT&T
pension and postretirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,731 |
)(b2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary estimate of fair value of identifiable net assets
(liabilities) acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,828 |
(b5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b1) |
The purchase price allocation included within these Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements is based upon
a purchase price of $14,857, calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
AT&T shares outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
798,570,623 |
|
Exchange ratio
|
|
|
0.77942 |
|
|
|
|
|
SBC shares to be issued
|
|
|
622,421,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
Price per share(1)
|
|
$ |
23.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate value of SBC consideration
|
|
$ |
14,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
Value attributed to par at $1 par value
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance to capital in excess of par value
|
|
$ |
14,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Price per share is based on the average closing price of SBC
common stock for the two days prior to, including and two days
subsequent to the public announcement of the merger. |
|
|
|
It is assumed that all stock will be new issuances. However, SBC
may issue treasury shares for a portion of the required SBC
common stock. The actual number of newly issued shares of SBC
common stock or treasury shares to be delivered in connection
with the merger will be based upon the number of AT&T shares
issued and outstanding when the merger closes. |
|
|
|
|
(b2) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet has
been adjusted to reflect AT&Ts pension and
postretirement benefit plans at fair value. The total adjustment
of $2,731 represents unrecognized net losses of $1,000 and
$1,298 and unrecognized prior service costs of $380 and $53 for
AT&Ts pension and postretirement plans, respectively,
as of December 31, 2004. |
77
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Such amounts were reflected in the balance sheet based on the
plans the adjustments relate to and whether such plans were in a
net asset or net liability position. |
|
|
|
|
(b3) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet has
been adjusted to report AT&Ts long-term debt at fair
value. The estimated fair value of AT&Ts long-term
debt (including current maturities of long-term debt) was
$10,928 at December 31, 2004, calculated using quotes or
rates available for debt with similar terms and maturities,
based on AT&Ts debt ratings at that time. The carrying
value of AT&Ts long-term debt (including current
maturities of long-term debt) was $9,970 at December 31,
2004, resulting in a total increase to debt of $958. The
carrying value of debt with an original maturity of less than
one year approximates market value. None of this fair market
value adjustment was attributed to current maturities of
long-term debt. |
|
|
|
(b4) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet has
been adjusted to eliminate the historical shareholders
equity accounts of AT&T. |
|
|
(b5) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet has
been adjusted to reflect the elimination of AT&Ts
historical goodwill and other purchased intangibles. The
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
reflect a preliminary allocation of the purchase price to
tangible assets and liabilities with many fair values
approximating historical book values as of December 31,
2004, especially for property, plant and equipment (PP&E).
The remaining unallocated purchase price was allocated to
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Net. |
|
|
|
|
|
Of the total amount allocated to Goodwill and Other
Intangibles Net, SBC has tentatively
identified approximately $1,500 for customers acquired with a
straight-line asset life of three years (amortization of this
intangible is reflected in the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Statement of Income). However, the final purchase price
allocation, based on third party appraisals, may result in
different allocations for tangible and intangible assets than
that presented in these Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements, and those differences could be material.
The following table is presented for illustrative purposes as an
example that gives the estimated annual impact on pro forma net
income for every incremental $1,000 that is allocated to
amortizable intangibles or PP&E with various lives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization | |
|
Net income | |
|
Per share | |
|
|
Lives in years | |
|
Expense | |
|
impact | |
|
impact | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
has been adjusted to eliminate certain intercompany revenues and
expenses, consisting primarily of switched access, UNE-P and
high-capacity transport services, which include DS1s and DS3s
(types of dedicated high-capacity lines), and SONET (a dedicated
high-speed solution for multisite businesses). Other
intercompany transactions and ending intercompany balances are
immaterial. |
|
|
(d) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
has been adjusted to reflect lower amortization of prior service
cost and unrealized losses due to the adjustment of
AT&Ts pension and postretirement plans to fair value
(see note b2). The adjustment reflects the elimination of
amounts recorded by AT&T in 2004 for amortization of
unrecognized prior service costs of $171 and amortization of
losses of $133 for pension and postretirement benefits. |
|
78
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Statements (Continued)
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
(e) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
has been adjusted to reflect lower interest expense due to the
adjustment of AT&Ts long-term debt to fair value (see
note b3). The difference between the fair value and the face
amount of each borrowing is amortized on a straight-line basis
as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of
the borrowing, based on the maturity date. |
|
|
(f) |
Pro forma combined basic and diluted earnings per common share
are based on the combined weighted average shares of SBC common
stock outstanding in 2004 of 3.31 billion and the
assumption that the approximately 622 million shares
assumed to be issued by SBC (see note b1) were outstanding
for all of 2004, calculated using the loss from continuing
operations. |
|
|
|
(g) |
Included in the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement
of Income is an impairment charge on PP&E of approximately
$11,400 recorded by AT&T in the third quarter of 2004. Since
the triggering event for assessing impairment of long-lived
assets occurred in July 2004, the impairment charge is not
adjusted in the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement
of Income. However, depreciation expense has been reduced by
$1,080 to reflect SBC estimates of PP&E fair value for the
purpose of purchase price allocation and are based on PP&E
levels after the impairment. Had the value used for depreciation
been assigned to PP&E as of the beginning of the year, there
would be no impairment. For purposes of the Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Statement of Income, the useful lives of
PP&E was two to 16 years for communications, network
and other equipment and five to 40 years for buildings and
improvements. |
|
|
(h) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
has been adjusted to reflect the elimination of AT&Ts
historical intangible asset amortization due to the elimination
of AT&Ts historical intangible assets (see note b5). |
|
|
(i) |
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
has been adjusted to reflect the aggregate pro forma income tax
effect of notes (c) through (h) above and the amortization
impact of item (b5). The aggregate pre-tax effect of these
adjustments was $1,151 reflected as Income (Loss) Before
Income Taxes in the Pro Forma Adjustments column on the
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income,
which was taxed at SBCs marginal tax rate of 38.05%. |
Note 3. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements
assume that the merger qualifies as a tax-free reorganization
for federal income tax purposes.
79
DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF SBC FOLLOWING THE MERGER
SBC Directors and Officers Following the Merger
Pursuant to the merger agreement, SBCs board of directors
will increase its size immediately following the effective time
of the merger and appoint David W. Dorman and two other members
of the AT&T board of directors mutually selected by SBC and
AT&T to SBCs board of directors. Mr. Dorman also
will be named as President of SBC immediately following the
effective time of the merger.
Biographical Information Regarding Current SBC Directors
Edward E. Whitacre, Jr., age 63, is Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer of SBC and has served in
this capacity since January 1990. Mr. Whitacre has been a
Director of SBC since October 1986. He is the Chairman of the
Executive Committee and a member of the Corporate Development
Committee and the Finance/ Pension Committee of SBC.
Mr. Whitacre is a Director of Anheuser-Busch Companies,
Inc. and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation.
Gilbert F. Amelio, age 62, is Senior Partner of
Sienna Ventures (a privately-held venture capital firm),
Sausalito, California, and has served in this capacity since
April 2001. Dr. Amelio is also Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Beneventure Capital, LLC (a full-service venture
capital firm), San Francisco, California, and has served as
such since 1999 and was Principal of Aircraft Ventures, LLC (a
consulting firm), Newport Beach, California, from April 1997 to
December 2004. In 2003, AmTech, LLC (a high technology
investments and consulting services firm), where Dr. Amelio
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to
April 2004, declared bankruptcy. Dr. Amelio was elected a
Director of SBC in February 2001 and had previously served as an
Advisory Director of SBC from April 1997 to February 2001. He
served as a Director of Pacific Telesis Group from 1995 until
the company was acquired by SBC in 1997. He is a member of the
Audit Committee and the Human Resources Committee of SBC.
Dr. Amelio is a Director of SiVault Systems, Inc.
August A. Busch III, age 67, is Chairman of the
Board of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (a brewing, packaging,
and family entertainment holding company), St. Louis,
Missouri, and has served in this capacity since 1977.
Mr. Busch also served as Chief Executive Officer of
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. from 1975 until June 2002.
Mr. Busch has been a Director of SBC since October 1983. He
served as a Director of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company from
1980 to 1983. He is the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee and a member of the Corporate Development
Committee and the Executive Committee of SBC. Mr. Busch is
a Director of Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. and Emerson
Electric Co.; and an Advisory Member of the Board of Directors
of Grupo Modelo, S.A. de C.V.
Martin K. Eby, Jr., age 70, retired. Mr. Eby
was Chairman of the Board of The Eby Corporation (a commercial
general contractor holding company), Wichita, Kansas, from April
1979 until his retirement in July 2004. Mr. Eby also was
President and Chief Executive Officer of The Eby Corporation
from June 1967 to December 1997. He has been a Director of SBC
since June 1992. He is a member of the Audit Committee and the
Human Resources Committee of SBC.
James A. Henderson, age 70, retired.
Mr. Henderson was Chairman of the Board from 1995 and Chief
Executive Officer from 1994 of Cummins Inc. (manufacturer of
diesel and natural gas engines), Columbus, Indiana, until his
retirement in December 1999. Mr. Henderson has been a
Director of SBC since October 1999. He served as a Director of
Ameritech Corporation from 1983 until the company was acquired
by SBC in 1999. He also served as a Director of Indiana Bell
Telephone Company (which became a subsidiary of Ameritech) from
1978 until 1983. He is the Chairman of the Human Resources
Committee and a member of the Executive Committee and the
Finance/ Pension Committee of SBC. Mr. Henderson is a
Director of International Paper Company; Nanophase Technologies
Corporation; Rohm and Haas Company; and Ryerson Tull, Inc.
Charles F. Knight, age 69, retired. Mr. Knight
was Chairman of the Board of Emerson Electric Co. (manufacturer
of electrical and electronic equipment), St. Louis,
Missouri, from 1974 until his retirement in
80
September 2004, when he was elected to the honorary position of
Chairman Emeritus. Mr. Knight also was Chief Executive
Officer of Emerson Electric Co. from 1973 to 2000. He has been a
Director of SBC since October 1983. He served as a Director of
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company from 1974 to 1983. He is the
Chairman of the Corporate Development Committee and a member of
the Executive Committee and the Finance/ Pension Committee of
SBC. Mr. Knight is a Director of Anheuser-Busch Companies,
Inc.; BP p.l.c.; International Business Machines
Corporation; and Morgan Stanley.
Lynn M. Martin, age 65, is Chair of the Council for
the Advancement of Women and Advisor to the firm of
Deloitte & Touche LLP (an auditing and management
consulting services firm), Chicago, Illinois, and has served in
this capacity since 1993. She has also been President of The
Martin Hall Group, LLC (a human resources consulting firm),
Chicago, Illinois, since January 2005. Ms. Martin served as
U.S. Secretary of Labor from 1991 to 1993 and as a member
of the U.S. House of Representatives from Illinois from
1981 to 1991. Ms. Martin has been a Director of SBC since
October 1999. She served as a Director of Ameritech Corporation
from 1993 until the company was acquired by SBC in 1999. She is
a member of the Finance/ Pension Committee and the Public Policy
and Environmental Affairs Committee of SBC. She is a Director of
Constellation Energy Group, Inc.; certain Dreyfus Funds; The
Procter & Gamble Company; and Ryder System, Inc.
John B. McCoy, age 61, retired. Mr. McCoy was
Chairman from November 1999 and Chief Executive Officer from
October 1998 of Bank One Corporation (commercial and consumer
bank) until his retirement in December 1999, and Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of its predecessor, Banc One
Corporation, from 1987 to 1998. Mr. McCoy has been a
Director of SBC since October 1999. He served as a Director of
Ameritech Corporation from 1991 until the company was acquired
by SBC in 1999. He is the Chairman of the Finance/ Pension
Committee and a member of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee and the Executive Committee of SBC. He is a
Director of Cardinal Health, Inc.; ChoicePoint Inc.; and Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
Mary S. Metz, age 67, is Chair of the Board of
Trustees of American Conservatory Theater (a nonprofit
nationally renowned theater and an accredited conservatory),
San Francisco, California, and has served in this capacity
since November 2004. Dr. Metz is also President Emerita of
Mills College. She was President of S. H. Cowell
Foundation, San Francisco, California, from January 1999
until her retirement in March 2005 and was Dean of the
University Extension of the University of California, Berkeley,
from 1991 until 1998. Dr. Metz has been a Director of SBC
since April 1997. She served as a Director of Pacific Telesis
Group from 1986 until the company was acquired by SBC in 1997.
She is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee and the Public Policy and Environmental Affairs
Committee of SBC. Dr. Metz is a Director of Longs Drug
Stores Corporation; Pacific Gas and Electric Company; and
UnionBanCal Corporation.
Toni Rembe, age 68, retired. Ms. Rembe was a
partner in the law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop LLP,
San Francisco, California, from 1971 until her retirement
in December 2004. Ms. Rembe was elected a Director of SBC
in January 1998 and had previously served as an Advisory
Director of SBC from April 1997 to January 1998 . She served as
a Director of Pacific Telesis Group from 1991 until the company
was acquired by SBC in 1997. She is a member of the Corporate
Development Committee and the Public Policy and Environmental
Affairs Committee of SBC. Ms. Rembe is a Director of Aegon
N.V.
S. Donley Ritchey, age 71, is Managing Partner
of Alpine Partners (a family investment general partnership),
Danville, California, and has served in this capacity since
1981. Mr. Ritchey was Chairman of the Board of Lucky
Stores, Inc. from 1981 until his retirement in 1986 as well as
Chief Executive Officer from 1980 to 1985. Mr. Ritchey has
been a Director of SBC since April 1997. He served as a Director
of Pacific Telesis Group from 1984 until the company was
acquired by SBC in 1997. He is a member of the Audit Committee
and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of SBC.
Mr. Ritchey is a Director of The McClatchy Company.
Joyce M. Roché, age 57, is President and Chief
Executive Officer of Girls Incorporated (a national nonprofit
research, education, and advocacy organization), New York, New
York, and has served in this capacity since September 2000.
Ms. Roché was an independent marketing consultant from
1998 to 2000. She
81
was President and Chief Operating Officer of Carson, Inc. from
1996 to 1998, and Executive Vice President of Global Marketing
of Carson, Inc. from 1995 to 1996. Ms. Roché has been
a Director of SBC since October 1998. She served as a Director
of Southern New England Telecommunications Corporation from 1997
until the company was acquired by SBC in 1998. She is a member
of the Finance/ Pension Committee and the Public Policy and
Environmental Affairs Committee of SBC. She is a Director of
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.; The May Department Stores
Company; and Tupperware Corporation.
Laura DAndrea Tyson, age 57, is Dean of the
London Business School, London, England, and has served in this
capacity since January 2002. Dr. Tyson was Dean of the
Walter A. Haas School of Business at the University of
California, Berkeley, from July 1998 to December 2001.
Dr. Tyson served as Professor of Economics and Business
Administration at the University of California, Berkeley, from
1997 to 1998. She served as National Economic Adviser to the
President of the United States from 1995 to 1996 and as Chair of
the White House Council of Economic Advisers from 1993 to 1995.
Dr. Tyson has been a Director of SBC since October 1999.
She served as a Director of Ameritech Corporation from 1997
until the company was acquired by SBC in 1999. She is a member
of the Corporate Development Committee and the Finance/ Pension
Committee of SBC. Dr. Tyson is a Director of Eastman Kodak
Company and Morgan Stanley.
Patricia P. Upton, age 66, is President and Chief
Executive Officer of Aromatique, Inc. (manufacturer and
wholesaler of decorative fragrances), Heber Springs, Arkansas,
and has served in this capacity since 1982. Ms. Upton has
been a Director of SBC since June 1993. She is the Chairwoman of
the Public Policy and Environmental Affairs Committee and a
member of the Executive Committee and the Human Resources
Committee of SBC.
Biographical Information Regarding SBC Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and title of each
of SBCs executive officers named in the Compensation Table
included in SBCs proxy statement for its 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders dated as of March 11, 2005;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Edward E. Whitacre Jr.
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
John H. Atterbury III
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Group President IP Services |
James D. Ellis
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President and General Counsel |
Randall L. Stephenson
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
Rayford Wilkins, Jr.
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Group President |
All of the executive officers have held high-level managerial
positions with SBC or its subsidiaries for more than the past
five years. Executive officers are not appointed to a fixed term
of office.
82
INFORMATION ABOUT THE AT&T ANNUAL MEETING
You should read this section along with the information
contained under the heading Questions and Answers about
the AT&T Annual Meeting and the Merger. Together they
are intended to answer the questions you may have about how you
may vote your shares of AT&T common stock at the AT&T
annual meeting, to provide you with answers about how AT&T
selected the nominees for director for whom you are being asked
to vote, about how you can communicate with the AT&T board
of directors, and how to propose a candidate for nomination or
submit a proposal to be considered at next years annual
meeting, if the merger has not yet been completed.
How do I vote?
All AT&T shareholders may vote by mail. Registered AT&T
shareholders who own their shares in their own name and most
beneficial AT&T shareholders who own shares through a bank
or broker also may vote by telephone or the Internet. If one of
these options is available to you, AT&T strongly encourages
you to use it because it is faster and less costly.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the Proxy Committee
to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed
and returned your proxy card. Under the laws of New York, the
jurisdiction in which we are incorporated, voting instructions
given telephonically or over the Internet are valid.
Registered AT&T shareholders can vote by
telephone by calling 1-800-273-1174 or on the Internet at
http://att.proxyvoting.com. Please have your proxy card
in hand when calling or going online. To vote by mail, please
sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided.
1. Vote by Telephone Call
1-800-273-1174 from any touch-tone telephone
ANYTIME. For telephone voting, you will need to enter the
number in the shaded area on your proxy card
|
|
|
|
|
|
To vote as your board of directors recommends on ALL
items PRESS 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
To vote on each of the 10 items separately PRESS 0 |
|
Election
of Directors (Item 2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
To vote FOR ALL nominees PRESS 1; |
|
|
|
|
|
to WITHHOLD FROM ALL nominees PRESS 9; |
|
|
|
|
|
to WITHHOLD FROM AN INDIVIDUAL nominee PRESS
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES: |
(01) W. F. Aldinger, (02) K. T. Derr,
(03) D. W. Dorman,
(04) M. K. Eickhoff-Smith,
(05) H. L. Henkel,
(06) F. C. Herringer,
(07) J. C. Madonna,
(08) D. F. McHenry and
(09) T. L. White |
All
other voting items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
To vote FOR PRESS 1; |
|
|
|
|
|
to vote AGAINST PRESS 9; |
|
|
|
|
|
to ABSTAIN PRESS 0 |
|
2. Vote by Internet Access the
website: http://att.proxyvoting.com/ which is available
ANYTIME. You will need to enter the number in the shaded
area on your proxy card. Follow the simple instructions provided
in the login site. Your vote will be immediately confirmed.
If you own your AT&T shares through a bank or
broker, you should follow the separate instructions they
provide you. Although most banks and brokers offer telephone and
Internet voting, availability and specific processes will depend
on their voting arrangements.
For participants in the AT&T Shareowner Dividend
Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan or the AT&T Amended
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, your shares will be voted as
you specify on your proxy
83
card and will not be voted if the proxy card is not returned or
if you do not vote by telephone or the Internet. For employee
AT&T shareholders participating in the AT&T Long Term
Savings Plan for Management Employees, the AT&T Long Term
Savings and Security Plan, the AT&T Retirement Savings and
Profit Sharing Plan, the AT&T of Puerto Rico, Inc. Long Term
Savings Plan for Management Employees, or the AT&T of Puerto
Rico, Inc. Long Term Savings and Security Plan, your shares will
be voted by the trustee of each applicable plan as you specify
on your voting instruction form. If your voting instruction form
is not returned, the trustee will vote your shares in the same
proportion as the shares for which instructions were received
from all other participants in that plan. If you wish to abstain
from voting on any matter, you must indicate this on your voting
instruction form. You cannot vote your plan shares in person at
the meeting. To allow sufficient time for voting, the trustee
must receive your voting instructions by no later than
9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on
[l], 2005.
If you attend the annual meeting in person, you may request a
ballot when you arrive. If your shares are held in the name of
your bank, broker, or other nominee, you need to bring an
account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you
were the beneficial owner of the shares on
[l], 2005, the record date for
voting.
What do I need to do if I wish to attend the AT&T annual
meeting in person?
If you are a registered AT&T shareholder, you should use the
admission ticket that is attached to your proxy card. If you
will attend the meeting, please be sure to respond to the
I/ We plan to attend the Annual Meeting question
when you vote. A beneficial AT&T shareholder may obtain an
admission ticket in advance by sending a written request, with
proof of ownership such as a bank or brokerage firm account
statement, to: Manager Proxy, AT&T Corp.,
Room 3A130, One AT&T Way, Bedminster, New Jersey
07921-0752.
AT&T shareholders who do not bring admission tickets to the
meeting may be admitted upon verification of ownership at the
admissions counter at the meeting site.
If you attend the annual meeting, you may be asked to present
valid government-issued photo identification, such as a
drivers license or passport, before being admitted.
Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not
be permitted, and attendees may be subject to security
inspections or other security precautions.
The [LOCATION] is fully accessible to disabled persons, and sign
interpretation and wireless headsets will be available for the
hearing impaired AT&T shareholders.
Highlights of the annual meeting will be available on
AT&Ts Investor Relations Website at
www.att.com/ir.
Does AT&T have a policy for confidential voting?
AT&T has a confidential voting policy. All proxies and other
voting materials, including telephone and Internet voting, are
kept confidential and are not disclosed to AT&T, SBC or
their officers and directors, subject to standard exceptions.
Such documents are available for examination only by the
inspector of election and certain personnel associated with
processing proxy cards and tabulating the vote. One independent
inspector of election, a consultant to IVS Associates, Inc., has
been appointed.
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?
Your shares are likely registered differently or are in more
than one account. You should vote each of your accounts by
telephone, the Internet, or mail. If you mail your proxy cards,
please sign, date and return each proxy card to guarantee that
all of your shares are voted. If you wish to combine your
AT&T shareholder accounts in the future, you should contact
AT&Ts transfer agent, EquiServe, at 1-800-348-8288.
Combining accounts reduces printing and mailing costs, resulting
in savings for AT&T that benefits you as an AT&T
shareholder.
84
Why did I receive only one set of proxy materials although
there are multiple AT&T shareholders at my address?
In accordance with a notice sent to eligible AT&T
shareholders that share a single address, AT&T is sending
only one set of proxy materials, which includes a proxy card for
each household member, to that address unless AT&T receives
instructions to the contrary from any AT&T shareholder at
that address. This practice, known as householding, is used to
reduce AT&Ts printing and postage costs. If an
AT&T shareholder of record residing at such an address
wishes to receive a separate set of proxy materials in the
future, he or she may contact Equiserve, AT&Ts
transfer agent, at 1-800-348-8288, or by e-mail to
att@equiserve.com, or write to EquiServe, P.O. Box 43007,
Providence, RI 02940-3007. If you are an AT&T
shareholder of record that receives multiple copies of
AT&Ts proxy materials, you can request householding by
contacting AT&T in the same manner. If you own shares
through a bank, broker, or other nominee, you can request
householding by contacting the nominee.
How do I access proxy materials on the Internet?
AT&T shareholders can access AT&Ts 2005 Notice of
Annual Meeting, this document and AT&Ts 2004 Annual
Report on Form 10-K on the Internet on AT&Ts
Investor Relations Website at www.att.com/ir. For future
AT&T shareholder meetings, registered AT&T shareholders
can further save AT&T expense by consenting to access their
proxy statement and annual report electronically. You can choose
this option by marking the Electronic Access box on
your proxy card or by following the instructions provided when
you vote by telephone or the Internet. If you choose this
option, prior to each AT&T shareholder meeting you will
receive your proxy card in the mail along with a notice of the
meeting and instructions for voting by mail, telephone, or the
Internet. You may select Electronic Access for each account held
in your name. Your choice will remain in effect unless you
revoke it by contacting AT&Ts transfer agent,
EquiServe, at 1-800-348-8288 or visiting AT&Ts
Investor Relations Website at www.att.com/ir. Internet
voting instructions are provided on page 83 under
How do I vote?.
How were the nominees for director selected?
Each of the nine nominees was approved for inclusion on
AT&Ts slate of directors by AT&Ts Governance
and Nominating Committee on February 17, 2005.
Mr. Dorman, AT&Ts Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, is one of AT&Ts executive officers.
Messrs. Aldinger, Derr and Dorman, Ms. Eickhoff-Smith,
Messrs. Henkel, Herringer, Madonna, McHenry and White were
elected by AT&Ts shareholders as directors at
AT&Ts May 2004 annual meeting and are standing for
re-election.
How does the AT&T board of directors determine which
directors are independent?
The standards for determining independence are set forth in
AT&Ts Corporate Governance Guidelines which are
available on AT&Ts Investor Relations Website
(www.att.com/ir/cg) and are attached as Annex D.
AT&Ts Guidelines meet or exceed the listing standards
of the NYSE.
Pursuant to the Guidelines, the AT&T board of directors
undertook its annual review of director independence on
March 7, 2005. During this review the AT&T board of
directors broadly considered all relevant facts and
circumstances, not merely from the standpoint of a director but
also from that of persons or organizations with which a director
has a relationship. As a result of this review, the AT&T
board of directors affirmatively determined that all of the
directors nominated for election at AT&Ts 2005 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, other than AT&Ts Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dorman, are
independent and have no material relationship with AT&T.
How can I recommend a candidate for election to the AT&T
board of directors?
AT&T shareholders who wish to recommend a candidate for
election to the AT&T board of directors should write to:
Vice President Law and Secretary, AT&T Corp.,
Room 3A123, One AT&T Way, Bedminster, NJ
07921-0752, stating in detail the qualifications of a candidate
for consideration by the Governance and Nominating Committee. In
considering board candidates, the committee seeks individuals of
proven judgment and competence who are outstanding in their
respective fields. The committee considers
85
such factors as experience, education, employment history,
special talents or personal attributes, anticipated
participation in board activities and geographic and diversity
factors. The committee process for identifying and evaluating
nominees would include detailed consideration of the
recommendations and opinions of members of the AT&T board of
directors, AT&Ts executive officers, AT&Ts
executive human resources department and the AT&T
shareholders. There would be no difference in the process of
evaluation of candidates recommended by an AT&T shareholder
and those recommended by other sources.
How can I communicate with the AT&T board of
directors?
AT&T shareholders interested in communicating directly with
the AT&T board of directors may do so by writing to: Board
of Directors, AT&T Corp., P.O. Box 406, Bedminster, NJ
07921-0752. The Governance and Nominating Committee of the
AT&T board of directors has approved a process for handling
letters received by AT&T and addressed to members of the
AT&T board of directors. Under that process, AT&Ts
Corporate Secretary, or members of his staff, review all such
correspondence and regularly forward to each non-employee
director a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all
correspondence that, in the opinion of the Corporate Secretary,
deal with the functions of the AT&T board of directors or
the boards committees, or that he otherwise determines
require their attention. Directors may at any time review a log
of all correspondence received by AT&T that is addressed to
members of the AT&T board of directors and request copies of
any such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting,
internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to
the attention of AT&Ts internal audit department and
handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit
Committee with respect to such matters.
How do I submit an AT&T shareholder proposal for next
years annual meeting?
AT&T shareholder proposals may be submitted for inclusion in
AT&Ts 2006 proxy statement after the 2005 annual
meeting, but must be received no later than 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time on Friday, November 25, 2005.
Proposals should be sent via registered, certified, or express
mail to: Vice President Law and Secretary, AT&T
Corp., Room 3A123, One AT&T Way, Bedminster, New
Jersey 07921-0752.
86
THE AT&T ANNUAL MEETING PROPOSALS AND INFORMATION
Information About the AT&T Board of Directors and
Corporate Governance
|
|
|
The AT&T Board of Directors |
The AT&T board of directors is responsible for establishing
broad corporate policies and monitoring AT&Ts overall
performance. However, in accordance with corporate legal
principles, the AT&T board of directors is not involved in
day-to-day operating matters. Members of the AT&T board of
directors are kept informed of AT&Ts business by
participating in board and committee meetings, by reviewing
analyses and reports sent to them each month and through
discussions with AT&Ts Chairman of the Board and other
officers.
The AT&T board of directors held 10 meetings and the
committees held 23 meetings in 2004. Each of the directors
attended at least 75% of the meetings of the AT&T board of
directors and its committees. The average attendance in the
aggregate at the total number of meetings of the AT&T board
of directors and the total number of committee meetings was
94.4%. It is AT&Ts policy that directors should attend
the annual meeting, absent unusual circumstances. Nine of the
ten members of the AT&T board of directors attended the
AT&T 2004 annual meeting.
AT&Ts non-employee directors meet in executive session
without any management directors or employees present
approximately eight times each year. The chairman of the
Governance and Nominating Committee serves as chairman for each
executive session of the AT&T board of directors.
|
|
|
Election of Directors (Proposal 2 on Proxy
Card) |
AT&Ts Proxy Committee intends to vote for the election
of the nine nominees listed on the following pages. These
nominees have been selected by the AT&T board of directors
on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating
Committee. If you do not wish your shares to be voted for
particular nominees, please identify the exceptions in the
designated space provided on the proxy card or, if you are
voting by telephone or the Internet, follow the instructions
provided when you vote. Directors will be elected by a plurality
of the votes cast. Any shares not voted, whether by abstention
or otherwise, have no impact on the vote.
If at the time of the meeting one or more of the nominees have
become unavailable to serve, shares represented by proxies will
be voted for the remaining nominees and for any substitute
nominee or nominees designated by the Governance and Nominating
Committee or, if none, the size of the AT&T board of
directors will be reduced. The Governance and Nominating
Committee knows of no reason why any of the nominees will be
unavailable or unable to serve.
Directors elected at the annual meeting will hold office until
the next annual meeting or until their successors have been
elected and qualified. For each nominee there follows a brief
listing of principal occupation for at least the past five
years, other major affiliations and age as of March 1, 2005.
|
|
|
Nominees for Election as Directors |
|
|
|
William F. Aldinger |
Age: 57 |
Director Since: 2003 |
Mr. Aldinger is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
HSBC North America Holdings Inc., a financial services company.
He joined HSBC Finance Corporation, formerly known as Household
International, Inc., in 1994 as President and Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Aldinger became Chairman of Household
International, Inc. in May 1996. He is an officer and director
of a number of subsidiaries of HSBC North America Holdings Inc.
Mr. Aldinger is a director of HSBC Holdings plc, MasterCard
International and Illinois Tool Works Inc. He is a member of the
boards of Childrens Memorial Medical Center/
Childrens Memorial Hospital and the Childrens
Memorial Foundation. Mr. Aldinger also serves on the board
of trustees of the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
87
|
|
Kenneth T. Derr |
Director Since: 1995 |
Age: 68
Mr. Derr is a retired Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of ChevronTexaco Corporation, an international
oil company. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from
1989 to 1999, Vice Chairman from 1985 to 1989 and director from
1981 to 1999. Mr. Derr also serves as a director of the
American Petroleum Institute, a member of The Business Council,
Council on Foreign Relations and the Board of Overseers of the
Hoover Institution; Director of the Committee to Encourage
Corporate Philanthropy; Director of American Productivity and
Quality Center; Member of the Board of the University of
California San Francisco Foundation, and Trustee Emeritus
of Cornell University. Mr. Derr is a director of Citigroup
Inc., Halliburton Company and Calpine Corporation.
|
|
David W. Dorman |
Director Since: 2002 |
Age: 51
Mr. Dorman has been the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of AT&T since November 2002. He was
President of AT&T from 2000 to 2002 and the Chief Executive
Officer of Concert, a former global venture created by AT&T
and British Telecommunications plc, from 1999 to 2000.
Mr. Dorman was Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of PointCast Incorporated from 1997 to 1999; Executive
Vice President of SBC Communications Inc. in 1997; Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Bell from 1994
to 1997; and President of Sprint Business from 1990 to 1994. He
served as a member of the Presidents Advisory Committee on
High Performance Computing and Communications, Information
Technology and the Next Generation Internet. Mr. Dorman is
a director of Scientific Atlanta, Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc.
|
|
M. Kathryn Eickhoff-Smith |
Director Since: 1987 |
Age: 65
Ms. Eickhoff-Smith has been President and Chief Executive
Officer of Eickhoff Economics, Inc., an economic consulting
firm, since 1987. She is a past Associate Director for Economic
Policy for the U.S. Office of Management and Budget
(1985-1987) and the former Executive Vice President and
Treasurer of Townsend Greenspan & Co., Inc.
(1962-1985). Ms. Eickhoff-Smith is a director of Tenneco
Automotive Inc.
|
|
Herbert L. Henkel |
Director Since: 2004 |
Age: 56
Mr. Henkel has been the Chairman of the Board of
Ingersoll-Rand Company, a manufacturer of industrial products
and components, since 2000 and President and Chief Executive
Officer since 1999. He was the President and Chief Operating
Officer of Ingersoll-Rand from April 1999 to October 1999.
Mr. Henkel was the Chief Operating Officer of Textron Inc.
from 1998 to 1999, and Vice President Industrial
Products Segment from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Henkel is a
director of Pitney Bowes Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
|
|
Frank C. Herringer |
Director Since: 2002 |
Age: 62
Mr. Herringer has been Chairman of the Board of
Transamerica Corporation, a financial services company, since
1995. He served as Chief Executive Officer from 1991 to 1999 and
President from 1986 to 1999. From 1999 to May 2000,
Mr. Herringer served on the Executive Board of Aegon N.V.
and as Chairman of the Board of Aegon USA, Inc.
Mr. Herringer is a director of The Charles Schwab
Corporation, Mirapoint Inc. and Amgen Inc.
|
|
Jon C. Madonna |
Director Since: 2002 |
Age: 61
Mr. Madonna is a retired Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of KPMG, an international accounting and consulting
firm. He was with KPMG for 28 years where he held numerous
senior leadership positions throughout his career and served as
Chairman from 1990 to 1996. Subsequent to his retirement from
KPMG, Mr. Madonna served as Vice Chairman of Travelers
Group, Inc. from 1997 to 1998 and President and Chief Executive
Officer of Carlson Wagonlit Corporate Travel, Inc. from 1999 to
2000. He was Chief Executive Officer of DigitalThink, Inc. from
2001 to 2002, and was Chairman of DigitalThink, Inc. from April
2002 to May 2004. Mr. Madonna is a director of
Albertsons, Inc., Phelps Dodge Corporation and Tidewater
Inc.
88
|
|
Donald F. McHenry |
Director Since: 1986 |
Age: 68
Mr. McHenry has been a Distinguished Professor in the
Practice of Diplomacy at the School of Foreign Service at
Georgetown University, since 1981. He has also been President of
IRC Group LLC, international relations consultants, since 1981.
Mr. McHenry is a director of FleetBoston Financial
Corporation, The Coca-Cola Company, International Paper Company
and GlaxoSmithKline plc.
|
|
Tony L. White |
Director Since: 2002 |
Age: 58
Mr. White is Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Applera Corporation, a life sciences
company. He was elected Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Perkin Elmer Corporation (renamed
Applera Corporation) in 1995. Prior to that, he was Executive
Vice President and a Member of the Office of the Chief Executive
Officer at Baxter International Inc. from 1991 to 1995.
Mr. White is a director of C.R. Bard, Inc. and
Ingersoll-Rand Company.
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson is not standing for re-election.
|
|
|
The Committees of the AT&T Board of Directors and
Their Functions |
The AT&T board of directors has established a number of
committees, including the Audit Committee, the Compensation and
Employee Benefits Committee and the Governance and Nominating
Committee, each of which is briefly described below. Another
committee of the AT&T board of directors is the Proxy
Committee whose members are listed on your proxy card. The Proxy
Committee votes the shares represented by proxies at the annual
meeting of AT&T shareholders.
The Audit Committee assists the AT&T board of directors in
maintaining the integrity of AT&Ts financial
statements, its financial reporting processes and systems of
internal audit controls, AT&Ts compliance with legal
and regulatory requirements and overseeing AT&Ts code
of conduct and ethics policies. The Audit Committee reviews the
scope of independent and internal audits and assesses the
results. The Audit Committee meets with AT&Ts
management to consider the adequacy of the internal controls and
the objectivity of financial reporting. The committee also meets
with the independent auditors and with appropriate financial
personnel and internal auditors concerning these matters. The
committee selects, compensates and appoints AT&Ts
independent auditors. Both the internal auditors and the
independent auditors periodically meet alone with the committee
and always have unrestricted access to the committee. AT&T
does not limit the number of audit committees of publicly listed
companies on which members of AT&Ts Audit Committee
may serve. One of AT&Ts Audit Committee members,
Mr. Madonna, serves on three other audit committees. In
March 2005 the AT&T board of directors affirmatively
determined that such simultaneous service would not impair
Mr. Madonnas ability to effectively serve on
AT&Ts Audit Committee. The Audit Committee currently
consists of six independent non-employee directors. The
committee met ten times in 2004.
The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee administers
incentive compensation plans, including stock option plans, and
advises the AT&T board of directors regarding employee
benefit plans. The committee establishes the compensation
structure for AT&Ts senior managers, approves the
compensation of AT&Ts senior executives and makes
recommendations to the AT&T board of directors with respect
to compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation
and Employee Benefits Committee currently consists of five
independent non-employee directors. The committee met nine times
in 2004.
The Governance and Nominating Committee advises and makes
recommendations to the AT&T board of directors on all
matters concerning directorship and corporate governance
practices, including compensation of directors and the selection
of candidates as nominees for election as directors, and
provides guidance with respect to matters of public policy. The
Governance and Nominating Committee currently consists of seven
independent non-employee directors. The committee met four times
in 2004. The committee recommended to the AT&T board of
directors the slate of directors for election at the 2005 Annual
Meeting of AT&T Shareholders.
89
AT&T is committed to the highest standards of corporate
governance and ethical behavior. On the recommendation of the
Governance and Nominating Committee, the AT&T board of
directors has adopted AT&Ts Corporate Governance
Guidelines which are available on AT&Ts Investor
Relations Website at www.att.com/ir/cg and are attached
hereto as Annex D. The AT&T board of directors has also
adopted a Financial Officer Code of Ethics which is also
available on AT&Ts Investor Relations Website. All of
AT&Ts directors, officers and employees must act
ethically at all times and in accordance with the policies set
forth in AT&Ts code of conduct. AT&Ts code
includes Our Common Bond, a set of business values
which guide all of AT&Ts decisions and behavior, and
is published on AT&Ts Investor Relations Website. The
AT&T board of directors did not grant any waivers of any
ethics policies in 2004 to AT&Ts directors or
executive officers. The charters of the Audit Committee,
Governance and Nominating Committee and Compensation and
Employee Benefits Committee are also available on
AT&Ts Investor Relations Website.
The table below provides membership information for each of the
AT&T board committees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Employee | |
|
Governance and | |
Name |
|
Audit | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Nominating | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mr. Aldinger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Derr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Eickhoff-Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Henkel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Herringer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Jackson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Madonna
|
|
|
Chair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. McHenry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chair |
|
Mr. White
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independence of Directors; Financial Expert |
The AT&T board of directors has determined that each of
AT&Ts non-employee directors is
independent within the definitions contained in the
current NYSE rules (see Information About the AT&T
Annual MeetingHow does the AT&T board of directors
determine which directors are independent? on
page 85). In addition, the AT&T board of directors has
determined that each member of the Audit Committee is
independent within the definition contained in the
current SEC rules. Furthermore, the AT&T board of directors
has determined that both Mr. Herringer and Mr. Madonna
qualify as audit committee financial experts as
defined by the SEC.
|
|
|
Compensation of Directors |
In 2004, independent non-employee directors received an annual
retainer of $70,000. The chairperson of the Audit Committee
received an additional annual retainer of $25,000. The
chairpersons of the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee
and the Governance and Nominating Committee each received an
additional annual retainer of $10,000. No fees are paid for
attendance at regularly scheduled board and committee meetings.
Directors received a fee of $1,500 for each special board or
committee meeting attended. Each director had the option of
either deferring his or her annual retainer, chair fees and
special meeting fees (pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan
for Non-Employee Directors) or receiving their fees as cash
payments. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, directors may elect to defer the receipt of all or
part of their cash retainer and other compensation into the
AT&T common stock portion or the cash portion of the
deferred compensation account. The AT&T common stock portion
(the value of which is measured from time to time by the market
value of AT&T common stock) is credited quarterly with a
number of deferred shares of AT&T common stock equivalent in
market value to the amount of the quarterly dividend on the
shares also then credited in the accounts. The cash portion of
the deferred compensation account earns interest, compounded
quarterly, at an annual rate equal to the average interest rate
for 10-year United States Treasury Notes for the previous
quarter, plus 5%, for amounts deferred prior to
90
January 1, 2001, and plus 2% for amounts deferred on or
after January 1, 2001. The American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 has imposed new restrictions on deferred compensation plans
including the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors.
Each independent non-employee director received an additional
award of AT&T restricted stock units equal in value to
$100,000 on the date of the grant, May 27, 2004. These
awards are in addition to the already existing awards of
AT&T restricted stock units equal in value to $100,000 on
the date of grant: February 23, 2004, for Mr. Henkel;
July 16, 2003, for Mr. Aldinger; and June 11,
2003, for all other non-employee directors. The awards granted
on May 27, 2004, vest 50% on the second anniversary
of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth
anniversaries of the grant date. The earlier awards vest upon a
directors retirement from the AT&T board of directors.
The restricted stock units awarded to non-employee directors pay
dividend equivalents quarterly in cash.
AT&T also provides independent non-employee directors with
travel accident insurance when on AT&Ts business and
complimentary telecommunications services. An independent
non-employee director may also enroll in a Directors
Universal Life Insurance Program sponsored by AT&T at no
cost to the independent non-employee director. The life
insurance benefit under the Directors Universal Life
Insurance Program will continue after the independent
non-employee directors retirement from the AT&T board
of directors.
The total premiums during 2004 for these policies were $500 for
travel accident insurance and $33,090 for group life insurance.
The value of telecommunications services received, or for which
reimbursement was provided, together with amounts necessary to
offset the directors applicable tax liabilities resulting
from such services and benefits, computed at maximum marginal
rates, averaged $5,447 per non-employee director in 2004.
Stock Ownership of AT&T Management and Directors
The following table sets forth information concerning the
beneficial ownership of AT&T common stock, as of
March 1, 2005, for (a) each current director elected
to the AT&T board of directors in 2004 and each nominee for
election as a director in 2005; (b) each of the executives
named in the Summary Compensation Table (the named executives)
not listed as a director; and (c) directors and executive
officers as a group. No director or executive officer owns any
AT&T preferred shares. Except as otherwise noted, the
nominee or family members had sole voting and investment power
with respect to such securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Other Common | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
Name |
|
Beneficially Owned(1) | |
|
Stock Equivalents(2) | |
|
Total | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William F. Aldinger
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
11,926 |
|
|
|
14,926 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kenneth T. Derr
|
|
|
3,835 |
(3) |
|
|
30,776 |
|
|
|
34,611 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David W. Dorman
|
|
|
1,752,318 |
(4) |
|
|
462,700 |
|
|
|
2,215,018 |
|
|
|
* |
|
M. Kathryn Eickhoff-Smith
|
|
|
4,245 |
(5) |
|
|
21,168 |
|
|
|
25,413 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Herbert L. Henkel
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
16,558 |
|
|
|
16,558 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
|
17,936 |
(6) |
|
|
18,970 |
|
|
|
36,906 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Shirley Ann Jackson
|
|
|
2,511 |
(7) |
|
|
20,571 |
|
|
|
23,082 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
|
3,901 |
(8) |
|
|
12,823 |
|
|
|
16,724 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald F. McHenry
|
|
|
3,726 |
(9) |
|
|
26,528 |
|
|
|
30,254 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Tony L. White
|
|
|
3,901 |
(10) |
|
|
17,882 |
|
|
|
21,783 |
|
|
|
* |
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Other Common | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
Name |
|
Beneficially Owned(1) | |
|
Stock Equivalents(2) | |
|
Total | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Cicconi
|
|
|
615,663 |
(11) |
|
|
112,800 |
|
|
|
728,463 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Hossein Eslambolchi
|
|
|
502,731 |
(12) |
|
|
211,400 |
|
|
|
714,131 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William J. Hannigan
|
|
|
218,002 |
(13) |
|
|
299,950 |
|
|
|
517,952 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas W. Horton
|
|
|
399,576 |
(14) |
|
|
187,900 |
|
|
|
587,476 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Common | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
Name |
|
Beneficially Owned(1) | |
|
Stock Equivalents(2) | |
|
Total | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (19 persons)
|
|
|
4,500,619 |
(15) |
|
|
1,730,762(16 |
) |
|
|
6,231,381 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Footnotes:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As of March 1, 2005, no individual director or nominee for
director or named executive beneficially owned 1% or more of
AT&Ts outstanding common shares, nor did the directors
and executive officers as a group. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Includes share units held in deferred compensation accounts that
do not constitute beneficially owned securities and restricted
stock units. The number of restricted stock units owned by each
non-employee director is as follows: |
|
|
|
William F. Aldinger
|
|
11,221 restricted stock units |
Kenneth T. Derr
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
M. Kathryn Eickhoff-Smith
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
Herbert L. Henkel
|
|
11,088 restricted stock units |
Frank C. Herringer
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
Shirley Ann Jackson
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
Jon C. Madonna
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
Donald F. McHenry
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
Tony L. White
|
|
11,077 restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
The number of restricted stock units owned by Mr. Dorman
and each of AT&Ts other named executives as of
March 1, 2005, is the number set forth in the column
Other Common Stock Equivalents. |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 2,745 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded
under a non-employee director incentive compensation plan. |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 1,521,007 shares that may
be acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options
awarded under employee incentive compensation plans. |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Includes 1,000 shares held in an IRA account and
100 shares held in a Keogh account. Also includes
200 shares held by a trust, as to which
Ms. Eickhoff-Smith has disclaimed beneficial ownership. In
addition, includes beneficial ownership of 2,745 shares
that may be acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock
options awarded under a non-employee director incentive
compensation plan. |
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Includes 10,000 shares held by trusts, 4,000 shares
held in an IRA account, 1,000 shares held in a Keogh
account for his spouse, 200 shares held by trusts for each
of his two daughters, 100 shares held by a trust for his
niece, and five shares held by a trust for his spouse. Also
includes 30 shares held in a custodial account as to which
Mr. Herringer has disclaimed beneficial ownership. In
addition, includes beneficial ownership of 2,401 shares
that may be acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock
options awarded under a non-employee director incentive
compensation plan. |
|
92
|
|
(7) |
Includes 78 shares owned by Dr. Jacksons spouse.
Dr. Jackson has disclaimed beneficial ownership of these
shares. Also includes beneficial ownership of 2,433 shares
that may be acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock
options awarded under a non-employee director incentive
compensation plan. |
|
(8) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 1,501 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded
under a non-employee director incentive compensation plan. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 381 shares held in a Keogh account. In addition,
includes beneficial ownership of 2,745 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded
under a non-employee director incentive compensation plan. |
|
|
|
(10) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 2,401 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded
under a non-employee director incentive compensation plan. |
|
|
|
(11) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 581,624 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded
under employee incentive compensation plans. |
|
|
|
(12) |
Includes 0.6 shares held in a 401(k) account. Also includes
beneficial ownership of 497,168 shares that may be acquired
within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded under
employee incentive compensation plans. |
|
|
(13) |
Includes 150 shares held in an IRA account,
100.7394 shares held by a trust for his son, and
100 shares held by a trust for his daughter. In addition,
includes beneficial ownership of 182,500 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to options awarded under
employee incentive compensation plans. |
|
(14) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 389,557 shares that may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options awarded
under employee incentive compensation plans. |
|
|
(15) |
Includes beneficial ownership of 4,108,901 shares that may
be acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options
awarded under employee and non-employee director incentive
compensation plans. |
|
|
|
(16) |
Includes 1,546,310 restricted stock units and 84,605 share
units held in deferred compensation accounts. |
|
Beneficial Ownership of More Than 5% of AT&T Common
Stock
The following table sets forth information as to the beneficial
ownership of AT&T common stock by each person or group known
by AT&T, based on filings pursuant to Section 13(d) or
(g) under the Exchange Act, to own beneficially more than
5% of the outstanding shares of AT&T common stock as of
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Shares | |
|
Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Research and Management Company
|
|
|
111,633,100 |
(1) |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
333 South Hope Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA 90071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dodge & Cox
|
|
|
103,261,885 |
(2) |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
555 California Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40th Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA 94104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1) |
Based on a Schedule 13G/ A filed on February 11, 2005,
by Capital Research and Management Company, an investment
adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, Capital Research is deemed to be the
beneficial owner, as a result of acting as investment advisor to
various companies, and has sole dispositive power with respect
to 111,633,100 shares or approximately 14.0% of
AT&Ts outstanding shares of common stock. |
|
(2) |
Based on a Schedule 13G/ A filed February 10, 2005,
Dodge & Cox beneficially owned these shares on behalf
of clients that may include investment companies registered
under the Investment Company Act and/or employee benefit plans,
pension funds, endowment funds or other institutional clients.
Dodge & Cox has sole voting power for
96,589,398 shares, shared voting power for
1,641,180 shares, sole dispositive power for
103,261,885 shares and no shared dispositive power for any
of the shares. |
93
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires AT&Ts
directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than
10 percent of a registered class of AT&Ts equity
securities, to file with the SEC and the NYSE initial reports of
ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of
AT&Ts equity securities.
To AT&Ts knowledge, based upon the reports filed and
written representations that no other reports were required,
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, none of
AT&Ts directors or executive officers failed to file
on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act with the following exceptions: William J. Hannigan,
one late report of three positions; and Christopher R. Reidy,
one late report of one position.
Ratification of The Appointment by The Audit Committee of
Independent Auditors (Proposal 3 on Proxy Card)
The Audit Committee has selected and appointed the firm of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditors to
examine AT&Ts financial statements for the year 2005.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited AT&Ts financial
statements for many years. The AT&T board of directors
recommends that AT&T shareholders vote FOR ratification
of the appointment. Ratification of the appointment of auditors
requires a majority of the votes cast. Any shares not voted,
whether by abstention or otherwise, have no impact on the vote.
AT&T Shareholder Proposals
AT&T receives many suggestions from AT&T shareholders,
some as formal AT&T shareholder proposals. All are given
careful consideration and are adopted, if appropriate.
Proponents of six AT&T shareholder proposals have stated
that they intend to present the following proposals at the
annual meeting. Information on the share ownership of the
proponents is available by writing to: Manager
Proxy, AT&T Corp., Room 3A130, One AT&T Way,
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921-0752. The proposals and supporting
statements are quoted below. The AT&T board of directors has
concluded it cannot support these proposals for the reasons
given.
|
|
|
No Future Stock Options AT&T Shareholder
Proposal (Proposal 4 on Proxy Card) |
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis, Watergate Office Building, 2600
Virginia Ave., NW, Suite 215, Washington, DC 20037, has
submitted the following proposal:
|
|
|
RESOLVED: That the Board of Directors take the
necessary steps so that NO future NEW stock options are awarded
to ANYONE, nor that any current stock options are repriced or
renewed (unless there was a contract to do so on some). |
|
|
REASONS: Stock option awards have gone out of hand
in recent years, and some analysts MIGHT inflate earnings
estimates, because earnings affect stock prices and stock
options. |
|
|
There are other ways to reward executives and
other employees, including giving them actual STOCK instead of
options. |
|
|
Recent scandals involving CERTAIN financial institutions
have pointed out how analysts CAN manipulate earnings estimates
and stock prices. |
|
|
If you AGREE, please vote YOUR proxy FOR this
resolution. |
AT&Ts directors recommend a vote against the above
proposal. The AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Program
(2004 Plan) approved by AT&T shareholders at AT&Ts
2004 Annual Meeting allows the Compensation and Employee
Benefits Committee (CEBC) to grant various equity-based
long-term incentive awards, including stock options. However, as
discussed in AT&Ts 2004 proxy statement, AT&T has
adopted a number of company practices, policies and special
limitations that enhanced AT&Ts pay-for-performance
94
philosophy and ownership culture. These included a migration
from AT&Ts historical reliance on stock options to the
use of other types of equity, including performance shares and
restricted stock units (RSUs).
Beginning in 2004, AT&T modified its long-term incentive
compensation strategy to eliminate the use of stock options and
utilize a blend of performance awards (70%) and RSUs (30%). The
CEBC believes, at this time, that this new approach provides a
stronger link to performance compared to time-vested stock
options. However, the 2004 Plan continues to allow for the use
of stock options should AT&Ts compensation programs
need to be adjusted to address emerging practices or future
expectations.
Eliminating stock options from AT&Ts long-term
incentive plan would significantly limit AT&Ts
boards flexibility to potentially modify AT&Ts
compensation practices based on new or unforeseen circumstances.
Management regularly reviews competitive compensation practices
in determining the various elements of pay, including equity
compensation programs, and the CEBC needs adequate flexibility
to adjust to changing market conditions.
Under the 2004 Plan, AT&T has included a number of design
elements to ensure that any stock option grant would incorporate
sound corporate governance requirements. These include
provisions to prohibit discounted options, reload features and
loans to exercise stock options. The 2004 Plan also expressly
prohibits both the direct and indirect repricing of underwater
options without AT&T shareholder approval (except in limited
transactions related to a capital adjustment or merger
transaction). Additionally, AT&T began expensing stock
option grants in 2003 and provides full disclosure on the
potential accounting expense associated with stock options.
Therefore, AT&Ts directors recommend that AT&T
shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
|
|
|
Link Restricted Stock Unit Vesting to
Performance AT&T Shareholder Proposal (Proposal
5 on Proxy Card) |
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
(AFSCME) Employees Pension Plan, 1625 L Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20036, has submitted the following proposal:
|
|
|
RESOLVED, that the shareowners of AT&T Corp.
(AT&T) ask the Compensation and Employee
Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors to adopt a policy
that a significant portion of restricted stock and restricted
stock units granted to senior executives require the achievement
of performance goals as a prerequisite to vesting. The policy
should be implemented in a way that does not violate any
existing employment agreement or the terms of any equity
compensation plan. The policy would not apply to performance
share units, which by their terms already contain performance
targets. |
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
|
|
|
AT&T uses a substantial amount of restricted stock to
compensate its senior executives. From 2001 through 2003, CEO
David Dorman received awards with a total value of $7,810,212,
while chief technology officer Hossein Eslambochi [sic] received
awards valued at $3,354,286 during that period. The vesting of
these awards does not depend on the achievement of any
performance goals; rather, they simply vest over time. |
|
|
We believe that compensation policies should align the
interests of senior executives with those of shareowners.
Restricted stock awards advance that goal better than stock
options because restricted stock grants facilitate direct
ownership of shares. Restricted stock grants also have the
virtue of more transparent accounting treatment than stock
options, whose cost unlike that of restricted
stock is not recognized on a companys income
statement. However, to provide appropriate incentives, we
believe that restricted stock awards should have real downside
risk. |
|
|
There has been significant criticism of the incentive
value of restricted stock grants without performance hurdles. An
August 11, 2003 editorial in Forbes characterized
restricted stock grants without performance targets as
weak incentives for improving performance. WorldCom/
MCI corporate monitor and former SEC chairman Richard Breeden
opined in his August 2003 governance |
95
|
|
|
recommendations that there is not a strong reason for
granting restricted stock rather than simply paying cash unless
there are performance hurdles to vesting. Matt Ward, CEO
of San Francisco-based Westward Pay Strategies, says
restricted stock grants without performance targets create
the lay-low effect: just lay low and dont get
fired. |
|
|
Leading companies have been requiring senior executives to
satisfy performance requirements before restricted stock can
vest. In its widely publicized 2003 shift from stock options to
restricted stock, Microsoft has imposed performance vesting
targets on its 600 most senior managers. The performance share
units granted to GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt in 2003 similarly require
the achievement of goals relating to cash flow from operations
and total shareholder return. AT&T should follow the lead of
these companies. |
|
|
The need for performance targets for the vesting of
restricted stock is especially acute in light of AT&Ts
stock price performance. According to the most recent proxy
statement, $100 invested in AT&Ts stock on
December 31, 1998 would have been worth $29 on
December 31, 2003, while $100 invested in an index of peer
companies would have been worth $38 on that date. |
|
|
We urge shareowners to vote for this proposal. |
AT&Ts directors recommend a vote against the above
proposal. The Board of Directors Compensation and
Employee Benefits Committee (CEBC), comprised exclusively of
independent outside directors, is responsible for, among other
things, discharging AT&Ts boards responsibility
relating to executive compensation programs and policies. The
CEBC supports the proponents underlying concept of
performance-based equity grants. However, AT&T believes that
its new executive compensation program is already substantially
based on performance and has effectively aligned management and
AT&T shareholder interests.
In connection with the approval by AT&T shareholders at
AT&Ts 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the
AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Program, AT&T adopted a
new long term incentive strategy which is predominantly
performance based. Going forward, awards to AT&Ts
employees are comprised of a blend of 70% performance
shares/units and 30% restricted stock units (RSUs).
The CEBC believes that restricted stock is a valuable component
of long term incentive compensation but should comprise a
smaller portion of compensation. AT&Ts performance
shares (which are the significant majority of long term
incentives) are tied to AT&Ts achievement of specified
financial objectives over a three-year period. The RSUs are
subject to a four-year vesting schedule, consistent with the
long term nature of the compensation. Additionally, certain
senior officers are required to hold the vested RSUs (net of
taxes) granted after 2003 for one additional year beyond the
vesting date. Executives must also meet the stock ownership
requirements described in the Executive
Compensation AT&Ts Board Compensation
Committee Report on Executive Compensation on
page 107.
The CEBC, based on input from AT&Ts independent
consultants, and a review of competitive benchmark data,
believes that the current structure is appropriately balanced
and competitive. Recruiting, retaining and motivating talented
employees is crucial in todays highly competitive global
economy. RSUs, when used reasonably, assist not only in
recruiting and retaining employees but also in motivating
employees to focus on AT&Ts long-term performance and
results.
The CEBC does not believe that the proposed policy is
appropriate. The proposed policy would only apply to the RSU
portion of AT&Ts new compensation program and fails to
take into account AT&Ts total long term incentive
program. Therefore, AT&Ts directors recommend that
AT&T shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
96
|
|
|
Executive Compensation AT&T Shareholder
Proposal (Proposal 6 on Proxy Card) |
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial
Organizations (AFL-CIO) Reserve Fund, 815 Sixteenth Street,
N.W., Washington, DC 20006, has submitted the following proposal:
|
|
|
Resolved: the shareowners of AT&T Corp.
(AT&T) request that the Compensation and
Employee Benefits Committee prepare a report for shareholders,
at reasonable cost and excluding confidential information, to
determine whether AT&Ts senior executive compensation
policies create an incentive to export jobs, restructure
operations or make other strategic decisions that are designed
to boost short-term earnings, but may have adverse consequences
for long-term shareholder value. |
|
|
|
AT&T has used earnings-based metrics, such as
operating net income, as criteria for determining
senior executives bonus awards. We believe such criteria
are inadequate. In our view, they create undue incentives for
senior executives to make strategic decisions geared towards
short-term earnings, even when those decisions may have adverse
long-term consequences for AT&T and its shareholders. |
|
|
In our view, the growing tendency of American corporations
to export jobs, either directly or through third party vendors,
makes this a timely issue. It appears that AT&T uses third
party vendors in other countries to provide a significant and
increasing share of its services for United States customers
(Boston Globe, 11/17/2004). |
|
|
At AT&T, we believe the temptation to export jobs is
exacerbated by the earnings-based metrics that are used to
determine bonus awards and incentive pay. These criteria may
give senior executives a personal incentive to boost earnings
within one- to three-year performance periods, because higher
earnings may increase their own pay. Consequently, they may be
rewarded for making decisions that boost earnings in the short
run, before it becomes apparent that the long-term consequences
are detrimental. |
|
|
A Reuters report concluded that, outsourcing
could do more harm than good (10/31/2003). The report
cited one survey in which 66 percent of companies ...
were disappointed with their outsourcing contracts. It
added that only 39 percent of the companies
[surveyed] would renew contracts with their existing outsourcing
suppliers, and 15 percent planned to bring services back
in-house. |
|
|
Business Week has reported that, many
companies [have] ended up repatriating ... work because they
felt they were losing control of core businesses or found them
too hard to coordinate (2/3/2003). Other reports have
expressed concerns about the security of customer and
proprietary information in offshore locations (The Sunday
Herald, 3/28/2004; BBC News, 4/4/2004). |
|
|
We believe bonus awards and long-term incentives should be
based on evaluations of executive performance that emphasize the
long-term consequences of strategic decisions. In our opinion,
the proposed report would help shareholders to judge whether our
Board of Directors provides appropriate incentives to senior
management. |
|
|
We urge shareholder to vote FOR this proposal. |
AT&Ts directors recommend a vote against the above
proposal. AT&T is sensitive to certain global
competitive, geographic and marketplace factors in determining
appropriate executive incentive programs and policies. However,
the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee
(CEBC) believes the proposal would arbitrarily and
unnecessarily consume AT&Ts resources and that the
report may not provide any significant benefit to AT&T
shareholders. A similar proposal received less than 9% of the
votes cast at AT&Ts 2004 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
AT&Ts CEBC, which is composed entirely of independent
directors, is responsible for determining the performance goals
and objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and the other
members of AT&Ts senior
97
management team. The CEBC is committed to establish fair and
equitable compensation policies and make decisions that are in
the best interests of AT&T and AT&T shareholders.
AT&Ts executive compensation program consists of an
annual base and long-term incentives based on AT&Ts
key financial and operational results that provide a mechanism
to reward executive officers for maximizing long-term AT&T
shareholder value. Further detail on these key components and
AT&Ts compensation philosophy statement can be found
on page 108.
AT&T describes its executive compensation policies, programs
and practices in this document. The AT&T board of directors
believes that the report sought by the proponent would not
provide any additional meaningful information to AT&T
shareholders and would not accomplish the objectives set forth
in the proposal. Therefore, AT&Ts directors
recommend that AT&T shareholders vote AGAINST this
proposal.
|
|
|
Poison Pill AT&T Shareholder Proposal
(Proposal 7 on Proxy Card) |
Mr. William Steiner, 112 Abbottsford Gate, Piermont, NY
10968, has submitted the following proposal:
7 Redeem or Vote Poison Pill
|
|
|
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that our Board adopt a
policy that any future poison pill be redeemed or put to a
shareholder vote within 4-months after it is adopted by our
Board. And formalize this as corporate governance policy or
bylaw consistent with the governing documents of our company. |
|
|
I believe that there is a material difference between a
shareholder vote within 4-months in contrast to any greater
delay in a shareholder vote. For instance a 5- to 12-month delay
in a shareholder vote could guarantee that a poison pill stays
effective through an entire proxy contest. This can result in us
as shareholders losing a profitable offer for our
stock or an exchange for shares in a more valuable
company. |
|
|
I believe that even if a special election would be needed,
the cost would be almost trivial in comparison to the potential
loss of a valuable offer. |
|
|
William Steiner, 112 Abbottsford Gate, Piermont, NY 10968
submitted this proposal. |
Pills
Entrench Current Management
|
|
|
They [poison pills] entrench the current management, even
when its doing a poor job. They [poison pills] water down
shareholders votes and deprive them of a meaningful voice
in corporate affairs. |
Take on the Street by Arthur Levitt, SEC Chairman,
1993-2001
Like
a Dictator
|
|
|
[Poison pill] Thats akin to the argument of a
benevolent dictator, who says, Give up more of your
freedom and Ill take care of you. |
T.J. Dermot Dunphy, CEO of Sealed Air (NYSE) for
25 years
Progress
Begins with a First Step
|
|
|
I believe that the advantage taking the above RESOLVED
step is reinforced by viewing our overall corporate governance
fitness which is not impeccable. For instance in 2004 it was
reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Library an independent investment research firm in
Portland, Maine rated our company:
F in Overall Board Effectiveness
D in Board Composition
F in CEO Compensation
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
D in Accounting
D in Strategic Decisionmaking |
|
|
|
The Corporate Library said, Overall the companys
Board Effectiveness Rating suggests that the weaknesses of the
board contribute a HIGH degree of investment, credit or
underwriter risk to this stock. |
|
|
|
Kenneth Derr was designated a problem director by
TCL because he was chairperson of the committee that set
executive compensation at our company, which received a CEO
Compensation grade of F. |
|
|
|
We had no Lead Director or Independent Chairman
independence concern. |
|
|
|
Eight directors were allowed to hold from 4 to
6 director seats each over-extension concern. |
|
|
|
2003 CEO pay of $17 million including stock option grants.
Source:
http://www.aflcio.org/corporateamerica/paywatch/ceou/database.cfm |
|
|
|
If CEO pay is excessive this could be a sign that
our board is weak in its oversight of our CEO. |
|
|
|
I believe the above slate of under-achievement practices
reinforce the advantage to adopt the one RESOLVED statement here
to help improve our corporate governance scores. |
Stock
Values
|
|
|
If a poison pill makes our company difficult to
sell the value of our stock could suffer. |
Redeem or Vote Poison Pill
Yes on 7
AT&Ts directors recommend a vote against the above
proposal. In AT&Ts 2004 proxy statement, AT&T
included an AT&T shareholder proposal submitted by
Mr. Steiner, with Mr. Chevedden as his proxy, which
sought to require the AT&T board of directors to seek
AT&T shareholder approval prior to the adoption or extension
of a shareholder rights plan, commonly referred to as a
poison pill. The proposal received the affirmative
vote of 66.65% of shares voting for or against the proposal. On
June 23, 2004, AT&Ts board of directors adopted a
Rights Plan Policy that states: No shareholder rights plan
will be adopted unless (i) approved by shareholders in
advance or (ii) a majority of the independent directors
determine, in the exercise of their fiduciary duties, that it is
in the best interests of shareholders to adopt the plan without
shareholder approval. AT&T believes that the inclusion
of the fiduciary exception in the Policy is required by New York
law and, accordingly, that AT&T has implemented the 2004
proposal to the maximum extent permitted by law.
This years proposal differs from the 2004 proposal in
calling for AT&T shareholder ratification of a poison
pill within four months after its adoption rather than
AT&T shareholder approval prior to the adoption of a
poison pill. AT&T does not believe this
constitutes a material difference and, in fact, this years
ratification proposal is weaker than the Rights Plan Policy
AT&T has already adopted, which requires prior AT&T
shareholder approval. It is also important to note that AT&T
has never adopted a poison pill and has no intention
of adopting one at this time. Finally, the agreement AT&T
has reached with SBC to acquire AT&T, illustrates that
poison pills are not a meaningful issue for AT&T
at this time.
In sum, the proposal is duplicative, unnecessary,
inconsequential and essentially moot. Therefore, the
AT&Ts directors recommend that AT&T shareholders
vote AGAINST this proposal.
99
|
|
|
Shareholder Approval of Future SERPs AT&T
Shareholder Proposal (Proposal 8 on Proxy Card) |
Domini Social Investments LLC, 536 Broadway, 7th Floor, New
York, NY 10012-3915, with co-filer, Ms. Jane Banfield, 32
Stevens Street, Bernardsville, NJ 07924, has submitted the
following proposal:
Executive Pension Benefits
|
|
|
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board adopt
a policy to seek shareholder approval of any future supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) or individual
retirement arrangement for senior executives that provides
preferential benefit formulas or supplemental pension benefits
not provided to other managers under the Companys regular
tax-qualified plan. Implementation of this policy shall not
breach any existing employment agreement or vested benefit. |
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
|
|
|
Companies establish SERPs to provide supplemental
retirement benefits that exceed IRS limitations on benefits that
can be paid from tax-qualified pension plans. In addition to its
traditional SERP, which provides contributions on salary above
IRS limits, AT&T maintains a second SERP providing officers
with additional contributions not available to other managers.
AT&T also maintains individual pensions for
certain officers that guarantee them lifetime pension annuities
on far more generous terms than apply to other managers. |
|
|
These plans together provide a substantial extra component
of compensation. AT&T estimated that CEO Dorman and CFO
Horton will receive annual payments of $1.99 million
and $1.42 million, respectively, at age 65. |
|
|
Unlike most companies with SERPs, AT&T also provides
individual non-qualified pension arrangements to
certain executive officers that have the effect of granting
extra years of service credit. For example, after just four
years of service, CEO Dorman is vested in a supplemental pension
equal (in 2005) to 34.7% of his final three-year average total
compensation and he accrues 3.6% for each additional
year of service (to a maximum 60%). |
|
|
Dormans employment agreement also includes a
pension parachute. If he terminates prior to 2010
due to a change in control, his minimum annual pension is
boosted by an additional 10.8% of final compensation. |
|
|
In comparison, prior to 1998, employees accrued 1.6% of
final average pay per year of service under AT&Ts
Management Pension Plan and would have needed over
20 years service to replace 34.7% of salary in retirement.
Moreover, in 1998 AT&T converted to a cash balance formula,
freezing pension contributions for thousands of managers for up
to 13 years, and reducing expected total benefits as much
as 50% for some employees. A class action lawsuit regarding the
conversion is currently pending in federal court. |
|
|
As AT&T downsizes, we believe these gross disparities
between the retirement security offered to senior executives and
to other employees create potential morale problems and
reputational risk, and may increase employee turnover. |
|
|
Moreover, because these forms of pension compensation are
not performance-based, they do not help to align management
incentives with long-term shareholder interests. Shareholder
approval of these benefits would help to ensure reasonable
formulas for future agreements. |
|
|
Because prior shareholder approval is often not practical,
the Company would have the option to seek approval after the
material terms of an executives employment agreement are
determined. |
AT&Ts directors recommend a vote against the above
proposal. AT&Ts executive compensation programs
are designed to help AT&T compete for the superior talent
required to achieve corporate objectives and increase AT&T
shareholders value. The AT&T board of directors,
through the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee (CEBC),
comprised solely of independent non-management directors, has the
100
sole responsibility for establishing, administering and
reviewing the policies and plans related to compensation and
benefits for senior executives. As stated in AT&Ts
Executive Compensation
AT&Ts Board Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation Compensation Philosophy and
Objectives beginning on page 108, AT&T operates
in a very competitive and dynamic industry and its compensation
and benefit programs for executives must be designed to attract
and retain executives who possess the talent necessary to
transform the business.
The shareholder proposal requests the AT&T board of
directors to seek AT&T shareholder approval of certain types
of post-termination benefits provided under employment
agreements and non-qualified retirement programs. Retirement
benefits are a critical component of a senior executives
overall compensation program. In order to attract high quality
senior management, AT&T must have the flexibility to offer
the retirement benefits offered by similar companies.
AT&T sponsors two Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans
(SERPs). The first SERP, the AT&T Excess Compensation and
Benefit Plan, provides supplemental retirement benefits for any
manager, including senior executives, whose contributions and
benefits under AT&Ts tax qualified retirement plan are
limited by the Internal Revenue Code. This type of supplemental
plan is almost universal for companies who sponsor tax-qualified
retirement plans.
The second SERP, the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension, provides
pension credits on annual bonuses and deferred salary for all
AT&T officers. While the annual bonuses for all managers,
other than officers, are provided pension credits in
AT&Ts tax qualified retirement plan (or the
excess plan to the extent the IRS limits are
exceeded), the annual bonuses of officers are only pensionable
under Non-Qualified Pension Plan using the same formula
applicable to other managers under the qualified plan.
As a result, all participants in these SERPs are treated equally
and the plans do not give preferential treatment to the most
senior officers.
The proposal further states that Mr. Dorman has an
individual non-qualified pension arrangement established as part
of his employment agreement that provides retirement benefits in
addition to those provided under AT&Ts SERPs.
Mr. Dormans original individual non-qualified pension
arrangement was a necessary component of the competitive
compensation package AT&T needed in order to attract a
seasoned telecommunications executive to AT&T. Overall, this
agreement was needed to offset the individual non-qualified
pension arrangement that Mr. Dorman was forfeiting from his
prior employer, and was modified in 2003 to reflect his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer. It is important to note
that Mr. Dormans individual non-qualified pension is
offset against other retirement benefits from AT&T and from
his former employer.
The AT&T board of directors firmly believes that, in the
extremely competitive market for talented telecommunications
executives, it is important to preserve its current flexibility
to design and implement competitive compensation programs,
including severance and retirement benefits. The AT&T board
of directors must be able to offer benefits commensurate with
the industry at large to attract, motivate and retain talent.
This proposal, if implemented, would significantly limit its
flexibility in creating competitive compensation packages for
senior executives in the future and may place us at a
significant competitive disadvantage against other companies.
Therefore, AT&Ts directors recommend that AT&T
shareholders vote AGAINST the proposal.
|
|
|
Shareholder Ratification of Severance
Agreements AT&T Shareholder Proposal
(Proposal 9 on Proxy Card) |
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS),
Lincoln Plaza, 400 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, has
submitted the following proposal:
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
|
|
|
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of AT&T Corporation
(the Company) amend the Companys bylaws, in
compliance with applicable law, to require that the Board of
Directors (Board) seek |
101
|
|
|
shareholder ratification of any Severance Agreement with any
Officer that provides Severance Benefits with a total present
value exceeding 2.99 times the sum of the Officers base
salary plus target bonus. Severance Agreement is
defined as any agreement that dictates what an Officer can be
compensated when AT&T terminates employment without cause or
when there is a termination of employment following a finally
approved and implemented change of control. Severance
benefits shall mean the value of all cash and non-cash
benefits, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) cash benefits; (ii) perquisites,
(iii) consulting fees, (iv) equity and the accelerated
vesting of equity, (v) the value of gross-up
payments, i.e., payments to off-set taxes, and (vi) the
value of additional service credit or other special additional
benefits under the Companys retirement system. If the
Board determines that it is not practicable to obtain
shareholder approval in advance, the Board may seek approval
after the material terms have been agreed upon. This bylaw
amendment shall take effect upon adoption and apply only to
agreements adopted, extended or modified after that date. |
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
|
|
|
As a major shareholder of the Company, CalPERS supports
compensation policies for Officers that strongly link pay to
performance. CalPERS strongly opposes pay practices that reward
under-performing Officers with large payouts when they are
terminated for poor-performance, e.g., CalPERS is outraged with
the $140 million severance payment made by the Disney
Corporation to Michael Ovitz after 14 months of employment.
The adoption of this by-law amendment, in CalPERS opinion, will
put a reasonable cap on what can be paid out to Officers who are
terminated for under-performance while allowing the Company the
flexibility it needs to attract qualified individuals to serve
in demanding positions of senior management. |
|
|
This proposal, in CalPERS opinion, will also address the
risk of egregious severance packages being paid out by the
Company as a result of a merger, acquisition or spin-off by
limiting: 1) The inappropriate acceleration of the vesting
of options for Officers in mergers, etc.; 2) Inappropriate
links between severance/change-of-control payments and
post-merger economic performance; 3) Recapitalizations
where the management and shareholder base does not substantially
change but change-in-control payments are triggered; and
4) The payment of gross-ups to pay federal
taxes owed. |
|
|
According to CalPERS Pay-for-Performance Model, for
each of the years from 2001 2003 the Companys
top 5 officers were compensated at least 10 times the median of
the industrys top 5 (industry being defined as the
four-digit Global Industry Classification System
5010). In addition, the Corporate Library graded the
Companys CEO Compensation an F. |
|
|
Since CalPERS believes the Company is high risk for
continuing its weak compensation practices, CalPERS urges
shareholders to vote FOR this proposal. |
AT&Ts directors recommend a vote against the above
proposal. The AT&T board of directors and the
Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee (CEBC) are
fully aware of the concerns that exist today about excessive
compensation. However, the CEBC needs the flexibility to provide
competitive compensation programs, including severance
agreements, which are often essential to attract and retain key
executive talent. The proposed action could hinder the AT&T
board of directors ability to recruit, motivate and reward
qualified executives by restricting the use of an important
compensation tool. In addition, AT&Ts compensation
policies and procedures are structured to guard against
excessive and unjustified compensation.
Importantly, the CEBC is composed of independent non-employee
directors who recommend the compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer for approval by the independent members of the AT&T
board of directors and approve the compensation of other
executive officers. AT&Ts compensation programs,
including the severance arrangements, are evaluated by the CEBC,
with input by independent executive compensation consultants.
These programs have been developed to be consistent with general
industry practice for companies of comparable size. The CEBC
devotes considerable time and effort to compensation issues,
including establishing the appropriate balance among various
objectives.
102
The CEBC believes that the use of employment and severance
agreements for a limited group of key executives is reasonable,
appropriate and necessary. Implementation of this proposal would
be costly and disruptive to the efficiency of AT&T. To call
a special meeting of AT&T shareholders to approve an
agreement prior to signing with an executive would be extremely
expensive and is unworkable on its face. Alternatively under the
proposal, AT&T could be required to present the agreement
for ratification to AT&T shareholders at the next annual
meeting. As a result, AT&T could not, in good faith, enter
into a definitive employment agreement with prospective
executives.
The CEBC believes that it is ultimately in the AT&T
shareholders best interests that responsibility for
executive severance continues to be vested in the outside
directors of the CEBC rather than being circumscribed by rigid
and arbitrary limitations reflected in the proposed resolution.
Therefore, AT&Ts directors recommend that AT&T
shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.
Advance Notice Procedures; Nomination of Directors
Under AT&Ts by-laws, no nominations of individuals for
election as directors or other business may be brought before
AT&Ts annual meeting except as specified in the notice
of the meeting (which notice includes shareholder proposals that
AT&T is required to set forth in its proxy statement under
SEC Rule 14a-8) or as otherwise brought before the meeting
by or at the direction of the AT&T board of directors or by
an AT&T shareholder entitled to vote who has delivered
written notice to AT&T (containing certain information
specified in the by-laws) not later than 90 or earlier than
120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding
years annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event
that the date of the annual meeting is more than 60 calendar
days before or more than 60 calendar days after such anniversary
date, the notice by the shareholder must be so delivered not
earlier than the close of business on the 120th calendar day
prior to such annual meeting but not later than the close of
business on the later of the 90th calendar day prior to such
annual meeting or the 10th calendar day following the calendar
day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is
first made by AT&T. These requirements are separate and
apart from and in addition to the SECs requirements that
an AT&T shareholder must meet to have a shareholder proposal
included in AT&Ts proxy statement under SEC
Rule 14a-8.
A copy of the full text of AT&Ts by-law provisions
discussed above may be obtained by writing to AT&Ts
Office of the Corporate Secretary. AT&Ts by-laws are
also available on the AT&T Investor Relations Website at
www.att.com/ir.
Other Matters to Come Before the Annual Meeting
In addition to the proposals described above, there will be an
address by AT&Ts Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer and a general discussion period during which
AT&T shareholders will have an opportunity to ask questions
about AT&Ts business. In the event that any matter not
described herein may properly come before the meeting, the Proxy
Committee will vote the shares represented by it in accordance
with its best judgment; provided, however, that the Proxy
Committee will only exercise this discretionary authority with
respect to matters that were unknown a reasonable time before
the solicitation of proxies. At the time this document went to
press, AT&T knew of no other matters that might be presented
for AT&T shareholder action at the AT&T 2005 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
Adjournment of Meeting to Permit Further Solicitation of
Proxies (Proposal 1.a on Proxy Card)
In the event that, as of the date of the meeting, the Proxy
Committee has not received proxies instructing it to vote in
favor of the adoption of the merger agreement sufficient to
adopt the merger agreement, AT&T may propose an adjournment
of the meeting in order to permit the further solicitation of
proxies. However, if such a proposal is made at the meeting, the
Proxy Committee will only be able to vote in favor of this
proposal the shares represented by it with respect to which it
has received a valid proxy indicating that it should vote in
favor of an adjournment proposed for this purpose. This proposal
is Item 1.a on the proxy card.
103
Report of the Audit Committee of the AT&T Board of
Directors
The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute
soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or
incorporated by reference into any AT&T filing under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
AT&T specifically incorporates this report by reference
therein.
Review of AT&Ts Audited Financial Statements
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the AT&T
board of directors in its general oversight of AT&Ts
financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions. The
Audit Committee Charter describes in greater detail the full
responsibilities of the Committee.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements of AT&T for the year ended
December 31, 2004, with management and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, AT&Ts independent
accountants. Management is responsible for the preparation,
presentation and integrity of AT&Ts financial
statements; accounting and financial reporting principles;
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e));
establishing and maintaining internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f));
evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and
procedures; evaluating the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting; and evaluating any change in internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control
over financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is
responsible for performing an independent audit of the
consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on
the conformity of those financial statements with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, as well as
expressing an opinion on (i) managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and (ii) the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting.
During the course of 2004 management completed the
documentation, testing and evaluation of AT&Ts system
of internal control over financial reporting in response to the
requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and related regulations. The Audit Committee was
kept apprised of the progress of the evaluation and provided
oversight and advice to management during the process. In
connection with this oversight, the Committee received periodic
updates provided by management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
At the conclusion of the process, management provided the
Committee with and the Committee reviewed a report on the
effectiveness of AT&Ts internal control over financial
reporting. The Committee also reviewed the report of management
contained in AT&Ts Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the SEC, as
well as PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm included in AT&Ts
Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its audit of
(i) the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule, (ii) managements assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
and (iii) the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. The Committee continues to oversee
AT&Ts efforts related to its internal control over
financial reporting and managements preparations for the
evaluation in 2005.
The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, Communication with
Audit Committees and PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2, An
Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in
Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements. In addition,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has provided the Audit Committee with
the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1, as amended, Independence Discussion
with Audit Committees, and the Audit Committee has discussed
with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP their firms independence.
104
Based on the Audit Committees review of the consolidated
financial statements and discussions with and representations
from management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP referred to
above, the Committee recommended to the AT&T board of
directors that the audited financial statements be included in
AT&Ts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
Submitted by: |
|
|
Jon C. Madonna (Chairman) |
|
William F. Aldinger |
|
M. Kathryn Eickhoff-Smith |
|
Herbert L. Henkel |
|
Frank C. Herringer |
|
Donald F. McHenry |
AT&Ts Independent Public Accountants
|
|
|
Principal Auditor Fees and Services ($ in
000s) |
Aggregate fees for professional services rendered for AT&T
by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended
December 31, 2004, and 2003, were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit
|
|
$ |
16,616 |
|
|
$ |
12,737 |
|
Audit Related
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
Tax
|
|
|
8,657 |
|
|
|
13,855 |
|
All Other
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
27,159 |
|
|
$ |
29,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 were for professional services rendered for the audits
of the consolidated financial statements of AT&T, statutory
audits, issuance of comfort letters and consents. In 2004, audit
fees also include fees for professional services rendered for
the audits of managements assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Related fees for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were for professional services
rendered for Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
readiness assistance and audits of employee benefit plans. In
2004, audit related fees also include fees for SAS 70
attestations and a carve-out audit. Additional fees of $850 and
$909 were paid in 2004 and 2003, respectively, directly by the
respective plan trusts for employee benefit plan audits and
related services.
Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 relate to tax compliance, including assistance with matters
relating to US, state, local and foreign income and non-income
tax returns, tax audits, assistance with claims for refunds, tax
services performed for executives and expatriates in various
countries, and tax advice related to transfer pricing and
restructuring of international operations.
All Other fees in 2003 were primarily for services
rendered for management advisory services.
The de minimis exception (described under
Preapproval Policies and Procedures below) was not
used for any fees paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the
above services other than audit services is compatible with
maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs independence.
105
All audit fees, audit related fees, tax fees and all other fees
were preapproved by the Audit Committee. The percentage of hours
expended on PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs engagement to
audit AT&Ts financial statements that were performed
by other than PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs full-time,
permanent employees did not exceed 50%.
Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be
present at AT&Ts 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
will have an opportunity to make a statement and are expected to
be available to answer questions.
|
|
|
Preapproval Policies and Procedures |
All audit and non-audit services provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP must be preapproved by the Audit
Committee. The non-audit services specified in
Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act may not be provided by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
The approval of all audit and non-audit services will take place
at the last Audit Committee meeting each year for the subsequent
fiscal year estimated services. During the course of the fiscal
year, any requests for unforeseen or additional audit or
non-audit services to be provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
must be preapproved by the Audit Committee, except for those
qualifying for the de minimis exception which provides that the
preapproval requirement for certain non-audit services may be
waived if:
|
|
|
(i) the aggregate amount of such non-audit services
provided to AT&T constitutes not more than 5% of the total
fees paid by AT&T to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in the
fiscal year such non-audit services are provided; |
|
|
(ii) such services were not recognized by AT&T as
non-audit services at the time they were provided; and |
|
|
(iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention
of the Audit Committee. |
The Audit Committee may delegate to the Chairman of the Audit
Committee the authority to grant preapprovals. In such event,
the decisions of the Chairman regarding preapprovals will be
presented to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.
In order to be presented to the Chairman of the Audit Committee
or the full Audit Committee for approval, all unforeseen or
additional proposed services must first be approved by the
Controller/ Chief Accounting Officer (if for a corporate
department) or Business Unit Chief Financial Officer, and by the
AT&T Chief Financial Officer.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will provide a revised estimate for
the year, by project, of audit and non-audit services to the
Financial Vice President Internal Audit prior to
each regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will review its revised services
estimate at each Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee
will periodically review such estimate with the full AT&T
board of directors.
Audit Committee approval of audit and non-audit services to be
performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP shall be disclosed to
investors in periodic reports required by the SEC.
106
Five Year Performance Comparison
The graph below provides an indicator of cumulative total
shareholder returns for AT&T common stock compared with the
S&P 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the S&P Composite
1500 Diversified Telecommunications Services Index (Diversified
Telecom Services).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec-99 |
|
|
Dec-00 |
|
|
Dec-01 |
|
|
Dec-02 |
|
|
Dec-03 |
|
|
Dec-04 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
AT&T common stock
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecom Services
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explanation
The graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 1999, in
AT&T common stock, the S&P 500 and Diversified Telecom
Services with the reinvestment of all dividends, including the
AT&T distribution to shareholders of AT&T Wireless
Services, Inc. (AWS) common stock on July 9, 2001, and
Comcast Corporation (Comcast) Class A common stock on
November 18, 2002(1). For the purpose of this chart, the
AWS and Comcast distributions are treated as nontaxable cash
dividends that would have been converted into additional
AT&T shares at the close of business for AWS on July 9,
2001, and at the close of business for Comcast on
November 18, 2002. The number of shares of AT&T common
stock outstanding and per share data have been adjusted to
reflect the one-for-five reverse stock split effective on
November 18, 2002.
Footnote:
|
|
(1) |
Data Source: S&P Compustat |
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
AT&T Board Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation |
The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee (the Committee)
administers incentive compensation plans, including equity
plans, and advises the AT&T board of directors regarding
employee benefit plans. The Committee also establishes the
compensation structure for senior managers, approves the
compensation of executive officers and makes recommendations to
the AT&T board of directors with respect to compensation of
the Chief Executive Officer. In 2004, the AT&T board of
directors approved the compensation of the named executives in
the Summary Compensation Table on page 113.
107
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
AT&T operates in a very competitive, dynamic and challenging
industry. AT&T believes that the compensation programs for
executives should be designed to attract and retain individuals
who possess the high-quality skills and talent necessary to
ensure AT&Ts success. AT&Ts compensation
philosophy provides a strong link between an executives
total earnings opportunity and AT&Ts short-term and
long-term performance, based on the achievement of predetermined
financial targets and operational goals relative to
AT&Ts competitors, as well as to an individuals
contributions. The core principles underlying the framework for
the programs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation opportunities must be competitive yet
reasonable The value will be based on comparable
companies pay opportunities and will be targeted at levels
that will attract, motivate and retain a highly skilled
workforce and enable AT&T to compete with other premier
employers for the best talent. |
|
|
|
Pay must be performance-based A significant
part of each executives compensation is directly linked to
achieving specific results that appropriately balance financial
and operational performance measures and stock price
appreciation, creating shareowner value in the short and long
term. |
|
|
|
A significant portion of the total compensation opportunity
should be equity-based AT&T believes that an
equity stake effectively aligns employee and shareowner
interests and provides proper motivation for enhancing
shareowner value. |
The Committee feels confident that, with the assistance of
compensation consultants and through benchmarking,
AT&Ts salary, bonus and equity-based programs enable
us to effectively attract, retain and motivate a high-caliber
management team. In addition, the Committee believes that, by
thoroughly reviewing all elements of compensation, AT&T has
fostered a competitive total rewards package designed to promote
its pay-for-performance philosophy.
Changes in 2004
Beginning in 2003 and continuing into 2004, AT&T worked with
an independent outside consultant to conduct a comprehensive
review of AT&Ts compensation philosophy and programs.
AT&T engaged the consultant to act as AT&Ts
advisor and report directly to us during the review process.
Outcomes of the review in 2004 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Revised AT&Ts position on
compensation Beginning in 2004, AT&T set an
objective to target pay levels at the median level of
AT&Ts peers when performance meets the set targets.
This represented a reduction from AT&Ts previous goal
to be a premium payer in the market. With median pay established
as the baseline, actual pay should exceed the median level only
when AT&Ts performance exceeds AT&Ts
targeted operational objectives or the performance of
AT&Ts peer companies. Similarly, actual pay should
fall below the median when performance is below these reference
points. As a result, AT&Ts compensation programs allow
the Committee to differentiate compensation levels by executive,
based on corporate performance, individual achievements and
personal talents and experience. |
|
|
|
Reaffirmed AT&Ts peer groups for benchmarking
purposes AT&Ts peer groups include
companies with large market capitalization and large
telecommunications companies. The 2004 benchmarking analysis
used data disclosed in the proxy statements and available
published surveys. |
|
|
|
Introduced a policy requiring officers and executives to
accumulate and hold targeted levels of common
stock AT&T believes that compensation
programs fostering continued stock ownership effectively align
executives with the long-term interests of shareowners and the
success of AT&T. |
Executive Compensation Components and Practices
AT&Ts executive compensation program consists of four
key components: base salary; short-term (annual) incentives;
long-term incentives (performance shares, restricted stock or
restricted stock units and
108
stock options); and certain other benefits and perquisites that
are aligned with general market practices. In addition, AT&T
now requires officers and executives to accumulate and hold
targeted levels of common stock. The policies and practices for
determining executive compensation are described hereunder.
Base Salary
The Committee establishes pay guidelines for each of the
executive officer positions based on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Job responsibilities and scope, |
|
|
|
Competitive compensation of similar positions at comparable
companies in AT&Ts peer groups, and |
|
|
|
AT&Ts targeted pay position. |
Within the established pay guidelines, each officers
salary is determined based on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic impact of the position, |
|
|
|
Expertise and level of experience required, |
|
|
|
Overall business performance, and |
|
|
|
Individual contributions. |
Annual salary reviews are conducted each year to evaluate the
individual performance of senior executives. While overall
salary increase funding is sensitive to both market movement and
AT&Ts performance, individual salaries are not
necessarily adjusted each year. The base salaries for the
AT&T executive officers named in this report did not
increase during 2004.
Short-Term Incentives
All executives are eligible to be considered for short-term
incentives. The annual bonus for executive officers is based on
AT&Ts key financial and operational results as
measured against targets for revenue, earnings (cash flow, net
income, or earnings before interest and taxes) and certain
qualitative measures of performance. (For 2004, earnings were
evaluated based on AT&Ts achievement of pre-determined
cash flow objectives.) Targets for these measures are
established in advance and reviewed and approved by the
Committee.
AT&T also sets a minimum performance level that must be met
before any awards can be paid. If that minimum level is not
achieved, no annual bonuses will be paid. The final award amount
depends on the actual level of performance achieved in
comparison to the targets. For 2004, 100% of the incentive pool
funding was determined by AT&Ts overall performance.
However, AT&T has the discretion to make adjustments to
ensure that award payments reflect AT&Ts true
operating results. If performance is at or above threshold, a
market share modifier can be used to make an adjustment to the
incentive pool funding of between -10% and 10%, based on
business unit market share.
An individuals bonus target is expressed as a percentage
of base salary. Bonuses for 2004, which were paid in March 2005,
could range from 50% to 200% of the target award. Once the
incentive pools are established, awards are allocated to
individuals as follows: 30% determined by the incentive pool
funding formula (described above) and 70% determined by the
individuals performance against his or her goals and
objectives.
|
|
|
Results for the 2004 Performance Year |
AT&Ts performance in 2004 was below target for the
revenue goal and at target for the earnings goal, based on
AT&T cash flow performance. Additionally, AT&T executed
and gained revenue market share in key areas. As a result, the
bonus pool was funded slightly below target. Bonuses for 2004
were paid out in March 2005.
109
Long-Term Incentives
Long-term incentives provide a mechanism to reward executive
officers for maximizing long-term shareowner value. In 2002 and
2003, the Committee reviewed AT&Ts equity compensation
strategy, specifically focusing on the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness of the current stock option strategy, |
|
|
|
AT&Ts yearly share usage for AT&Ts long-term
incentive awards as compared to the AT&T common stock
outstanding (AT&Ts run rate), |
|
|
|
The potential dilutive impact of the equity programs, and |
|
|
|
The impact of the depressed stock prices within the
telecommunications industry. |
As a result of the review, the Committee and management
determined that a new long-term incentive strategy combining
only performance-based awards and restricted stock units will:
|
|
|
|
|
Strengthen AT&Ts ability to attract, retain and
motivate top talent and performers, |
|
|
|
Provide a stronger link to performance than time-vested stock
options, |
|
|
|
Better align the interests of AT&Ts senior executives
and shareowners, |
|
|
|
Provide a better opportunity for senior executives to acquire
and hold AT&T stock, and |
|
|
|
Lower the potential share usage levels by directly impacting the
annual run rate of shares and mitigating the potential long-term
dilution implications of 10-year stock options. |
At the AT&T 2004 annual meeting, shareowners overwhelmingly
approved the AT&T 2004 Long Term Incentive Program. Awards
under the program going forward will be comprised of 70%
performance-based awards and 30% restricted stock units for all
participants.
Performance Shares
|
|
|
2001-2003 Performance Share Plan |
Performance shares are units equivalent in value to shares of
AT&T common stock. At the end of the performance cycle,
performance shares are paid out based upon the achievement of
pre-set targets for corporate performance set by the Committee.
The performance share award approved by the Committee in 2001
for the 2001-2003 performance period was paid out in 2004. The
award was based on three-year cumulative earnings per share and
EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization) results against pre-established targets and
relative total shareholder return, as measured against S&P
500 peer group companies.
Based on AT&Ts actual performance for the period
covering 2001-2003, 100% of the performance shares were earned
and distributed as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on
page 113. Although actual earnings per share and EBITDA
were slightly above target, the funding was reduced to 100% of
target because AT&Ts total shareholder return was
below the 50th percentile of the S&P 500.
|
|
|
2004 Performance Share Plan |
Under the 2004 plan, performance share units are to be granted
annually, with a three-year performance period. Awards are
intended to be paid in shares. An annual goal is set for each of
the three years in the performance period (2004-2006). The
payout is based on the average performance over the three years.
This represents a change from the 2001-2003 plan, which had
cumulative goals for the three-year period. This change was made
because in the dynamic telecommunications industry, developing
goals over extended periods of time is challenging. The
performance measures are revenue and earnings. Dividend
equivalents are accrued and paid in cash based on the award
earned at the end of the three-year performance period.
110
For performance at the threshold level, the plan pays out 50% of
the target award. For performance at the target level, the
payout is 100%. At the maximum level, the payout is 150%.
In 2004, all executives and officers were eligible to be
considered for restricted stock unit awards primarily for
purposes of retention. Restricted stock units are subject to
forfeiture and may not be disposed of by the recipient until
certain restrictions established by the Committee lapse. For
restricted stock unit awards granted in 2004, 50% vest after
year two, 25% vest after year three, and 25% vest after year
four. Dividend equivalents will be paid quarterly in cash.
Officers of AT&T are required to hold restricted stock units
for one full year after they are fully vested.
|
|
|
Run Rate and Dilution Management |
In addition to providing competitive individual grant levels,
AT&T will also monitor the annual share usage levels and
resulting dilution to ensure alignment with shareowner
interests. As AT&T communicated to its shareowners when the
2004 plan was approved, AT&T will target the annual share
usage level to approximately 0.9% of AT&Ts common
shares outstanding. The actual annual run rate is expected to be
as low as 0.77% or as high as 1.0% percent per year, depending
on the achievement of specified performance targets and
objectives. Overall, the shares granted in 2004 represent a run
rate of 0.94% (at target performance), while the projected run
rate for 2005 is expected to be approximately 0.8%.
|
|
|
Perquisites and Personal Benefits |
In order to attract and retain key talent, AT&T provides
certain perquisites and benefits to senior executives, including
the CEO and the other named executives. These perquisites and
benefits can include life insurance, financial counseling,
perquisite allowance, reimbursement for home and travel,
temporary living allowances and use of the AT&T aircraft for
business. In addition to the non-contributory pension plans that
cover all management employees, the senior executives also
participate in the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan, and
certain named executives are covered by individual supplemental
executive retirement plans.
The Committee periodically reviews the programs to ensure that
their cost and use are in line with competitive practices.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
AT&T approved stock ownership guidelines in March 2004
(subject to shareowner approval of the 2004 Long Term Incentive
Program, which was received in May 2004). The guidelines require
that executives and officers own shares of stock in AT&T.
They are also required to hold shares from grants of restricted
stock units in 2004 and beyond for one year after vesting. The
Committee believes that achievement of meaningful levels of
stock ownership by executives and officers further advances the
interests of AT&T and its shareowners.
111
The chart below lists the stock ownership guidelines. Officers
are expected to achieve these ownership levels over five years
(March 2005 to March 2009). Stock holdings that count for
purposes of meeting the guidelines include direct stock
purchases, shares or share equivalents held in employee benefit
plans and restricted shares.
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
President & COO
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
CFO & Vice Chairman
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Business Unit President
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Other Senior Staff officers
|
|
|
11,000 - 60,000 |
|
|
|
|
(depending |
|
|
|
|
on position) |
|
Other Officers
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
Compensation for the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of AT&T
Mr. Dorman has been AT&Ts Chief Executive Officer
since November 18, 2002. His performance was reviewed by
the Committee at the end of 2004 (as it is at the end of each
year) and discussed with the AT&T board of directors in
executive session. AT&T then made recommendations to the
AT&T board of directors concerning the annual cash component
(base salary and annual bonus) and the long-term component
(performance shares and restricted stock units) of
Mr. Dormans compensation. The AT&T board of
directors approved the recommendations based on the
considerations discussed below.
Mr. Dormans base salary is established based on
competitive market rates for a chief executive with his
experience and record of accomplishment. During its annual
compensation survey and review process, the Committee reviews
Mr. Dormans salary in comparison with the salaries of
chief executive officers of industry competitors and selected
other large, market-capitalized companies in AT&Ts
peer group. Based on the results of the 2004 competitive review
and AT&Ts policy of not increasing officers
salaries in 2004, the AT&T board of directors kept
Mr. Dormans salary at $1,325,000.
AT&T established aggressive market-based performance targets
for annual bonuses. Based on AT&Ts 2004 revenue and
earnings achieved, which were slightly below target, and the
addition of the market share modifier, as well as the level of
achievement on certain operational objectives, the AT&T
board of directors authorized an annual bonus for
Mr. Dorman of $1,970,000. His bonus was equal to the
funding available in accordance with the annual bonus plan
formula.
During 2004, the AT&T board of directors granted
Mr. Dorman 388,700 performance shares, as described in the
Summary Compensation Table on page 113. The AT&T board
of directors also granted Mr. Dorman 166,600 restricted
stock units in May 2004. These grants are consistent with the
provisions of the programs that apply to the officers named in
this report.
Deductibility Cap on Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax
deduction to public companies, such as AT&T, for
compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the
corporations Chief Executive Officer and four other most
highly compensated executive officers. Section 162(m) of
the Code provides that qualifying performance-based compensation
will not be subject to the deduction limit if certain
requirements are met. Elements of compensation under the
short-term incentive plan and 2001-2003 performance share awards
qualify for exemption from the annual limit on tax deductibility
under Section 162(m) of the Code. Awards of performance
shares and restricted stock units granted in 2004 are not
expected to qualify. In addition, AT&T
112
has a salary and incentive award deferral plan that permits
compensation deferred under the plan to be exempt from the limit
on tax deductibility.
Impact of the Merger with SBC
On January 30, 2005, SBC and AT&T entered into a
definitive agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the
terms and conditions of which AT&T would be acquired by SBC.
AT&Ts benefit plans and programs will continue
business as usual through the closing of the merger,
in accordance with their terms. Any decisions regarding benefits
after the close will be made by SBC. However, under the merger
agreement, SBC has agreed that employees and former employees,
for a period of time after the merger, will have compensation
and benefit plans and programs that are no less favorable in the
aggregate than they have at AT&T. This commitment will
continue through the end of the plan year (generally
December 31) following the first anniversary of the
closing. For example, if the merger closes in 2006, the
commitment will generally apply through December 31, 2007.
Conclusion
The Committee, with the assistance of AT&Ts outside
consultants, has reviewed all compensation elements based on key
benchmark and comparator data. AT&Ts review included
base salaries, bonus arrangements, long-term incentive awards
and benefit programs. AT&T believes that its overall
compensation levels are appropriate and reasonable, and will
allow it to continue attracting and retaining key talent while
meeting the overall objectives of its compensation programs.
|
|
|
The Compensation and Employee |
|
Benefits Committee |
|
|
Kenneth T. Derr (Chairman) |
|
William F. Aldinger |
|
Frank C. Herringer |
|
Shirley Ann Jackson |
|
Tony L. White |
Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the Committee members were officers or employees of
AT&T or any of AT&Ts subsidiaries or had any
relationship requiring disclosure by AT&T under
Item 404 of the SECs Regulation S-K during or
prior to 2004.
Summary Compensation
Table
Set forth below is the compensation of the Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of AT&T and the four other most
highly compensated individuals who were executive officers of
AT&T at the end of 2004, as measured by salary and bonus.
Compensation deferred at the election of the named executives is
included in the category (e.g., bonus, LTIP payouts) and year it
would have otherwise been reported had it not been deferred.
Performance share distributions are paid in the year subsequent
to the three-year performance period and are reported in the
year paid.
Share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the
November 18, 2002, spin-off of AT&T Broadband and
subsequent merger with Comcast, and AT&Ts
November 18, 2002, one-for-five reverse stock split.
Amounts shown represent the dollar value on the date originally
granted. Performance share cycles ending on December 31,
2002, were adjusted for the AT&T Wireless Services
(AWS) split-off, and those ending on December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 were adjusted for the AT&T Broadband
spin-off in order to preserve the economic value of the awards
prior to such actions. Each holder of such awards received an
adjusted performance share award, which was subsequently divided
by five and rounded down to the nearest whole share, and a
Comcast stock unit award. The new Comcast stock unit award is
paid in cash based on the
113
value of Comcast Corporation Class A common stock upon the
completion of the performance period of the original performance
share award. Each AT&T stock option award held by an active
AT&T employee at the time of the AT&T Broadband spin-off
was divided by a factor of 0.3872 reflecting the ratio of the
price of AT&T common stock prior to the AT&T Broadband
spin-off ($13.12) versus the assumed price of AT&T common
stock immediately after the AT&T Broadband spin-off and
prior to the AT&T one-for-five reverse stock split ($5.08),
which was calculated by dividing by five the price at which
AT&T common stock actually commenced trading after both the
spin-off and the reverse stock split ($25.40). All grant prices
were multiplied by this same factor. To further adjust for the
one-for-five reverse stock split, the stock options were
multiplied by 0.2 and the grant price divided by 0.2. All shares
were rounded down to the nearest whole share and the grant
prices rounded to four decimals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Annual Compensation(2) | |
|
Awards | |
|
Payouts | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Restricted Stock | |
|
|
|
LTIP | |
|
All Other | |
Named Executives and Principal |
|
|
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Award(s)(2) | |
|
Options/SARs | |
|
Payouts | |
|
Compensation(3) | |
Position at AT&T |
|
Year | |
|
Salary($) | |
|
Bonus($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
(#) AT&T | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
David W. Dorman
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
1,325,000 |
|
|
|
1,970,000 |
|
|
|
1,163,514 |
|
|
|
2,773,890 |
(a) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,547,488 |
|
|
|
178,912 |
|
|
Chairman of the |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
1,268,750 |
|
|
|
2,649,000 |
|
|
|
908,264 |
|
|
|
2,853,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
707,090 |
|
|
|
3,341,283 |
|
|
Board and CEO
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
1,080,797 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
594,024 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,247,416 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,128,663 |
|
William J. Hannigan
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
921,649 |
|
|
|
1,147,000 |
|
|
|
1,601,728 |
|
|
|
5,060,828 |
(a)(b) |
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,319,038 |
|
|
President and COO |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Thomas W. Horton
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
697,000 |
|
|
|
212,960 |
|
|
|
1,192,140 |
(a) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
404,804 |
|
|
Vice Chairman |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
940,000 |
|
|
|
142,625 |
|
|
|
1,141,200 |
|
|
|
520,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
418,403 |
|
|
and CFO |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
1,371,367 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
519,110 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,491,167 |
|
Hossein Eslambolchi
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
708,000 |
|
|
|
176,588 |
|
|
|
695,970 |
(a) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
474,389 |
|
|
|
641,083 |
|
|
President AT&T |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
579,167 |
|
|
|
585,800 |
|
|
|
136,853 |
|
|
|
2,250,066 |
|
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
|
51,804 |
|
|
|
662,670 |
|
|
Global Network |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
537,500 |
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
177,465 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
428,718 |
|
|
|
56,691 |
|
|
|
673,207 |
|
|
Technology Services AT&T CTO & CIO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Cicconi
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
620,000 |
|
|
|
616,000 |
|
|
|
114,901 |
|
|
|
557,775 |
(a) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
899,585 |
|
|
|
297,006 |
|
|
General Counsel & |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
605,000 |
|
|
|
840,300 |
|
|
|
125,086 |
|
|
|
951,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
134,419 |
|
|
|
82,261 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
593,750 |
|
|
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
139,524 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
406,766 |
|
|
|
268,564 |
|
|
|
376,970 |
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes (i) payments of above-market interest on deferred
compensation, (ii) dividend equivalents with respect to
long term compensation paid during the year and (iii) tax
payment reimbursements. In addition, includes the aggregate
incremental cost to AT&T of providing perquisites and
personal benefits to the named executive officers for the last
three years. The amounts reported for 2004 include:
(a) financial counseling for Mr. Horton in the amount
of $20,800; and (b) personal use of corporate aircraft by
the named executive or members of the executives family
for Messrs. Dorman, Hannigan and Horton in the amount of
$507,639, $148,903 and $43,936, respectively. The amounts
reported for 2003 include: (a) financial counseling for
Mr. Horton in the amount of $13,670; (b) personal use
of corporate aircraft by the named executive or members of the
executives family for Messrs. Dorman and Horton in
the amount of $305,403 and $20,565, respectively; and
(c) car allowance for Mr. Horton in the amount of
$16,800. The amounts reported for 2002 include:
(d) financial counseling for Mr. Dorman in the amount
of $80,740; (e) relocation for Mr. Horton in the
amount of $86,815; (f) personal use of corporate aircraft
by the named executive or members of the executives family
for Messrs. Dorman, Horton and Eslambolchi in the amount of
$109,115, $39,948 and $76,911, respectively. |
|
(2) |
Restricted stock units were granted and remain outstanding as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
On May 27, 2004, Messrs. Dorman, Hannigan, Horton,
Eslambolchi and Cicconi received restricted stock unit awards of
166,600, 110,350, 71,600, 41,800 and 33,500 units,
respectively. These AT&T restricted stock units vest 50% on
May 27, 2006, 25% on May 27, 2007, and 25% on
May 27, 2008. Dividend equivalents on the restricted stock
units are paid in cash. The value of these awards, as of the
original grant date, is reflected in the table. |
114
|
|
|
|
(b) |
On January 5, 2004, Mr. Hannigan received a grant of
150,000 restricted stock units. These AT&T restricted stock
units vest 52,500 on January 31, 2005, 37,500 on
November 30, 2005, 30,000 on January 31, 2006, and
30,000 on January 31, 2007. Dividend equivalents on the
restricted stock units are paid in cash. The value of these
awards, as of the original grant date, is reflected in the table. |
|
|
|
The aggregate number (and value) with respect to each of the
named executives on December 31, 2004, for outstanding
AT&T restricted stock units were: Mr. Dorman, 316,600
($6,034,396); Mr. Hannigan, 260,350 ($4,962,271);
Mr. Horton, 131,600 ($2,508,296); Mr. Eslambolchi,
160,100 ($3,051,506); and Mr. Cicconi, 83,500 ($1,591,510). |
|
|
(3) |
In 2004, includes (a) AT&T contributions to savings
plans (Mr. Dorman $8,200, Mr. Hannigan $8,200,
Mr. Horton $8,200, Mr. Eslambolchi $8,200 and
Mr. Cicconi $8,200); (b) dollar value of the benefit
of premiums paid for universal life insurance policies
(unrelated to term insurance coverage) calculated on an
actuarial basis (Mr. Dorman $55,962, Mr. Hannigan
$34,138, Mr. Horton $21,604, Mr. Eslambolchi $17,717
and Mr. Cicconi $22,670); (c) payments equal to lost
savings plan matching contributions caused by IRS limitations
(Mr. Dorman $42,750, Mr. Eslambolchi $15,166 and
Mr. Cicconi $16,136); (d) payment of $72,000 to
Mr. Dorman and $15,000 to Mr. Hannigan for temporary
housing expenses; (e) special bonus payment of $710,000 to
Mr. Hannigan, equal to the target bonus from his prior
employer; (f) hiring bonus of $1,000,000 paid to
Mr. Hannigan; (g) two special payments, each in the
amount of $525,850, to Mr. Hannigan, for replacement of
restricted stock from his prior employer; (h) special
one-time payment of $1,500,000 to Mr. Hannigan, associated
with his transition and relocation to New Jersey;
(i) payment of a special retention bonus of $375,000 to
Mr. Horton; (j) special recognition payment of
$600,000 to Mr. Eslambolchi; and (k) special
recognition payment of $250,000 to Mr. Cicconi. |
Aggregated Option/ Stock
Appreciation Rights (SAR) Exercises in 2004 and Year End
Values
AT&T Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable/Unexercisable(2) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of AT&T | |
|
$ Value of AT&T | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money | |
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
$ Value | |
|
Options/SARs at | |
|
Options/SARs at | |
Name(1) |
|
Acquired on Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Year End | |
|
Year End | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
David W. Dorman
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,332,917 |
|
|
|
458,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,498,712 |
|
|
|
1,374,188 |
|
William J. Hannigan
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Thomas W. Horton
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
389,557 |
|
|
|
183,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
649,553 |
|
|
|
549,675 |
|
Hossein Eslambolchi
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
441,118 |
|
|
|
122,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,564 |
|
|
|
366,450 |
|
James W. Cicconi
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
517,916 |
|
|
|
152,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,737 |
|
|
|
458,062 |
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of AT&T and the four other most highly compensated
individuals who were executive officers of AT&T at the end
of 2004, as measured by salary and bonus. |
|
(2) |
Share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect
AT&Ts April 15, 1999, three-for-two stock split;
the distribution and split-off of AWS on July 9, 2001; the
spin-off of AT&T Broadband and subsequent merger with
Comcast on November 18, 2002; and AT&Ts
November 18, 2002, one-for-five reverse stock split, as
described in Summary Compensation Table
above. |
115
|
|
|
Long Term Incentive Plans Awards in
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under | |
|
|
|
|
Performance | |
|
Non-Stock Price Based Plans | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Period Until | |
|
| |
|
|
Performance | |
|
Maturation | |
|
Threshold | |
|
Target | |
|
Maximum | |
Name(1) |
|
Shares | |
|
or Payout | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#)(2) | |
|
(#) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
David W. Dorman
|
|
|
388,700 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
|
194,350 |
|
|
|
388,700 |
|
|
|
583,050 |
|
William J. Hannigan
|
|
|
257,450 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
|
128,725 |
|
|
|
257,450 |
|
|
|
386,175 |
|
Thomas W. Horton
|
|
|
149,600 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
|
74,800 |
|
|
|
149,600 |
|
|
|
224,400 |
|
Hossein Eslambolchi
|
|
|
97,300 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
|
48,650 |
|
|
|
97,300 |
|
|
|
145,950 |
|
James W. Cicconi
|
|
|
77,800 |
|
|
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
|
38,900 |
|
|
|
77,800 |
|
|
|
116,700 |
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of AT&T and the four other most highly compensated
individuals who were executive officers of AT&T at the end
of 2004, as measured by salary and bonus. |
|
(2) |
In May 2004, the Performance Share Awards listed in the table
were made. If they remain named executives on December 31,
2006, the payout value of these awards to Messrs. Dorman,
Hannigan, Horton, Eslambolchi and Cicconi would be
(i) 0.13% of AT&Ts net cash provided by operating
activities for each year in the performance period, divided by
the total number of named executives receiving payouts for the
period ending December 31, 2006, or (ii) a lesser
amount, based on factors such as targets for AT&Ts
earnings, return to equity, cash flow, revenue or total
shareholder return for the period. |
|
|
|
Option/ SAR Grants in 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants in AT&T | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Options/SARs | |
|
|
|
|
Options/ | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise or | |
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
SARs | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Base Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Present | |
Name(1) |
|
Granted(2) | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
($/Share) | |
|
Date | |
|
Value(4)($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
David W. Dorman
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Hannigan(3)
|
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
21.4050 |
|
|
|
01/05/2014 |
|
|
|
4,069,750 |
|
Thomas W. Horton
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hossein Eslambolchi
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Cicconi
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1) |
Includes the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of AT&T and the four other most highly compensated
individuals who were named executives of AT&T at the end of
2004, as measured by salary and bonus. |
|
(2) |
In 2004, AT&T did not grant new stock option awards.
Long-term incentives in 2004 consisted of performance shares
(see Long-Term Incentive Plans
Awards in 2004 above) and restricted stock units (see
Summary Compensation Table above). |
|
(3) |
These options become exercisable to the extent of one-fourth of
the grant on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries
of the grant date, respectively. |
|
(4) |
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was chosen to estimate
the Grant Date Present Value of the options in this table.
AT&Ts use of this model should not be construed as an
endorsement of its accuracy in valuing options. All stock option
valuation models, including the Black-Scholes model, require a
prediction about the future movement of the stock price. The
following assumptions were made for purposes of calculating the
Grant Date Present Value on the grants awarded on
January 5, 2004: an |
116
|
|
|
option term of five years, volatility of 38%, dividend yield of
4.00% and interest rate of 3.35%. The actual value, if any, of
the options in this table depends upon the actual performance of
AT&T common stock during the applicable period. |
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
The following table summarizes information as of
December 31, 2004, relating to equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for | |
|
|
Number of Securities to be | |
|
Weighted-average | |
|
Future Issuance Under | |
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Equity Compensation Plans | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
(excluding securities | |
Plan Category |
|
Warrants and Rights(2) | |
|
Warrants and Rights(2) | |
|
reflected in column(a))(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Shares in thousands | |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
|
|
108,308 |
|
|
$ |
36.0501 |
|
|
|
30,758 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders(1)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total
|
|
|
108,308 |
|
|
$ |
36.0501 |
|
|
|
30,758 |
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1) |
With respect to equity compensation plans that AT&T has
assumed in connection with mergers, acquisitions or
consolidations, the aggregate number of shares of AT&T
common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights outstanding under such plans on
December 31, 2004, was 4,072,538 shares and the
weighted average exercise price of such outstanding options,
warrants and rights was $39.1219. These shares were granted
under plans administered by companies acquired by AT&T and
upon acquisition no longer provided shares for future grants.
Each of these acquired plans was approved by shareholders of
companies acquired by AT&T except for the US WEST Media
Group 1997 Stock Option Plan and the MediaOne Group 1999
Supplemental Stock Plan. |
|
(2) |
AT&Ts 1997 Long Term Incentive Program (as amended,
the 1997 LTIP) originally provided for the issuance of
150 million shares of AT&T common stock. In 1999 the
1997 LTIP was amended to provide for an annual increase in the
number of shares available for awards under the 1997 LTIP equal
to 1.75% of the number of shares of AT&T common stock
outstanding on the first day of each year commencing
January 1, 2000. Pursuant to this provision, an additional
61,992,101 shares of AT&T common stock became available
for awards on January 1, 2002; 13,703,158 became available
for awards on January 1, 2003; and 13,858,443 became
available for awards on January 1, 2004. The 1997 LTIP
limited the number of shares to be awarded other than stock
options or stock appreciation rights. The 1997 LTIP expired on
May 31, 2004, and no longer provides shares for future
grants. AT&Ts 2004 Long Term Incentive Program was
approved by shareholders for use beginning May 27, 2004,
providing for the issuance of 36 million shares of AT&T
common stock. As of December 31, 2004, 30.8 million
shares remain available for future awards. |
|
|
|
Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment
Agreements |
AT&T entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Dorman dated December 1, 2000, with a term
of employment ending December 31, 2002. The agreement is
subject to automatic annual renewals after that date unless
either AT&T or Mr. Dorman provide written notice to
terminate at least 60 days prior to each anniversary date.
The agreement provided for compensation, incentive and
relocation arrangements that have been paid to Mr. Dorman.
Mr. Dormans current compensation is set by the
AT&T board of directors and is described in the section
entitled Summary Compensation Table
above.
117
As part of his employment agreement, Mr. Dorman entered
into a fully vested supplemental pension arrangement with
AT&T. Pursuant to such arrangement and a 2003 amendment,
Mr. Dorman will receive an annual benefit (as defined)
commencing at his retirement based on a schedule that provides
for a benefit equal to a percentage of his final three-year
average total cash compensation. The benefit will be payable in
stated reduced amounts for retirement prior to 2012. In the
event of Mr. Dormans involuntary termination
following a Change in Control (as defined), the schedule of
supplemental pension benefits will be accelerated by three
years. Pension benefits payable under this arrangement will be
offset by any pension paid to Mr. Dorman by AT&T or any
prior employer.
Mr. Dormans agreement provides for certain
entitlements in the event of his termination from AT&T under
specified circumstances. In the event of Mr. Dormans
termination due to death or disability, Mr. Dorman, his
beneficiaries, or estate will be entitled to disability benefits
in accordance with a disability program then in effect for
senior executives of AT&T, a prorated portion of his target
annual incentive award for the year in which his death or
disability occurs, the vesting and payout at target for each
open long-term incentive program performance share cycle
prorated for the amount of time worked in the applicable
three-year cycle, financial counseling for one year, and payment
of survivor benefits under his supplemental pension arrangement.
Mr. Dormans unvested equity awards vest, and stock
options will be exercisable in accordance with the terms of the
grants applicable to death or disability.
In the event of a termination for cause, Mr. Dorman shall
receive no further compensation from AT&T as of his
termination date, and all stock options, performance shares,
restricted shares, and restricted stock units, whether unvested
or vested but not exercised, shall be cancelled.
In the event of a voluntary resignation (as defined),
Mr. Dorman will forfeit all unvested equity awards and
long-term incentives with respect to uncompleted performance
cycles. He will receive base salary through his date of
termination and vested stock options shall remain exercisable
for 90 days after termination or until the originally
scheduled expiration date, if earlier. Mr. Dorman, to the
extent not eligible for retiree medical benefits from AT&T,
will be eligible for benefits under the then-applicable AT&T
Separation Medical Plan offered to certain former senior
managers under the terms and conditions of that plan and will be
responsible for a portion of the annual premium for this
coverage.
In the event of an AT&T-initiated termination for other than
cause or a Good Reason termination (as defined), Mr. Dorman
will be provided base salary through the date of termination, a
prorated annual incentive award at target for the year of
termination, a severance payment equal to two times the annual
base salary and target annual incentive award for the year of
termination, payment of benefits under his supplemental pension
arrangement based on the amount of the benefits accrued,
accelerated vesting of all outstanding unvested restricted
shares and restricted stock units, performance shares and stock
units will continue to vest, and continuation of his Executive
Life Insurance. Under the terms of the Senior Officer Separation
Plan under which Mr. Dorman is a covered executive, he will
be provided the following: all outstanding unvested AT&T
stock options vest and, together with already vested options,
will be exercisable for the remainder of the original term of
each grant, financial counseling for two years, telephone
reimbursement under the AT&T Toll Discount Program,
transition counseling and, to the extent not eligible for
retiree medical benefits from AT&T, will be eligible for
coverage under the AT&T Separation Medical Plan offered to
certain former senior managers under the terms and conditions of
that plan.
Mr. Dormans agreement provides that, in the event of
a Change in Control (as defined) of AT&T, severance payments
to him shall be governed by the Change in Control provisions,
applicable to senior executives named by the AT&T board of
directors as participants in the Senior Officer Separation Plan.
Mr. Dormans agreement (in addition to a standing
resolution of the AT&T board of directors) provides for his
unlimited use of AT&Ts aircraft for personal travel by
him and his immediate family members that accompany him, and to
the extent this results in imputed income, AT&T will provide
him with a tax gross-up payment.
118
AT&T entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Hannigan dated April 26, 2004, with a term
of employment from December 2, 2003, through
December 1, 2006, with automatic annual renewals
thereafter. The agreement provided for his participation in
employee benefit plans on the same terms as other senior
executives, and for a base salary not less than $925,000, a
target annual bonus of 125% of base salary, a long-term
incentive grant of 257,450 performance shares covering the
2004-2006 performance period and 110,350 restricted stock units
vesting 50% after year two, 25% after years three and four.
To address certain forfeitures experienced when
Mr. Hannigan left his previous employer and to incent him
to join us, the agreement provided for a hiring bonus and a
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). Pursuant to the
SERP, Mr. Hannigan will receive an annual benefit (as
defined) commencing at his retirement based on a schedule that
provides for a benefit equal to a percentage of his final
three-year average total cash compensation. The benefit will be
payable in stated reduced amounts for retirement prior to 2024.
The SERP vests on December 2, 2008; prior to that date the
SERP vests in the event of AT&T-initiated termination for
other than Cause (as defined), death, disability termination for
Good Reason (as defined), or if AT&T is subject to a Change
in Control (as defined). For AT&T-initiated termination for
other than Cause or termination for Good Reason within two years
following a Change in Control, the schedule of supplemental
pension benefits will be accelerated by three years. Pension
benefits payable under this arrangement will be offset by any
pension paid to Mr. Hannigan by AT&T or any prior
employer. Mr. Hannigan also received cash, stock options
and restricted stock units to replace benefits forfeited by
leaving his prior employer. Mr. Hannigans agreement
provided for a special one-time payment associated with his
transition and relocation to New Jersey, and a special temporary
living allowance until his Texas home sold.
Mr. Hannigan is entitled to use the corporate aircraft for
business and personal use, pursuant to current authorizations.
Mr. Hannigan is allowed to use a financial counselor of his
choice for whom AT&T will pay fees, impute income and
provide tax gross-ups within the limits of the AT&T Senior
Management Financial Counseling Program.
Mr. Hannigans agreement provides in the event of his
termination from AT&T at or before the end of its term,
other than due to voluntary resignation or Cause (as defined in
the Senior Officer Separation Plan), he will be entitled to his
base salary through the date of termination, a prorated annual
incentive award at target for the year of termination, and
treatment under the employee benefit plans in accordance with
the terms and conditions of such plans.
In addition to the above entitlements, in the event of an
AT&T-initiated termination or termination for Good Reason
(as defined), Mr. Hannigan will be entitled to the benefits
of the AT&T Senior Officer Separation Plan provisions (as
defined), a vesting of the SERP and the January 5, 2004,
grant of restricted stock units. In the event of
Mr. Hannigans termination resulting from death or
disability, Mr. Hannigan, his beneficiaries, or estate will
be entitled to disability benefits in accordance with a
disability program then in effect for senior executives of
AT&T, his equity awards will be administered in accordance
with the terms of each grant, and the SERP will vest.
AT&T entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Horton dated June 10, 2002, with a term of
employment from June 13, 2002, through June 15, 2006,
with automatic annual renewals thereafter. The agreement
provided for his participation in employee benefit plans on the
same terms as other senior executives, and for compensation,
incentive and relocation arrangements that have been paid to
Mr. Horton. Mr. Hortons compensation is set by
the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee and is
described under the section entitled Summary
Compensation Table above.
Mr. Hortons agreement provides for certain
entitlements in the event of his termination from AT&T under
specified circumstances. In the event Mr. Horton is
terminated at or before the end of the term of the agreement,
Mr. Horton will be paid his base salary through the date of
termination pursuant to his agreement, his equity awards will be
treated in accordance with the terms of the grants, and he will
be treated under the
119
employee benefit plans in accordance with the terms and
conditions of such plans. In the event of an AT&T-initiated
termination for other than cause or a Good Reason termination,
Mr. Horton will be entitled to the benefits of the AT&T
Senior Officer Separation Plan provisions (as defined).
In the event of Mr. Hortons termination resulting
from death or disability, Mr. Horton, his beneficiaries, or
estate will be entitled to disability benefits in accordance
with a disability program then in effect for senior executives
of AT&T, his target annual incentive award for the year in
which his death or disability resulted in his termination of
employment (prorated for the total period of eligibility
calculated as of his date of death or disability termination),
and financial counseling for one year.
AT&T entered into an agreement with Mr. Horton on
July 29, 2003, that provides a special individual
non-qualified pension arrangement pursuant to which
Mr. Horton will receive an annual benefit (as defined)
commencing at his retirement. The arrangement vests upon the
earliest of January 1, 2008, death, disability, Good Reason
termination, termination initiated by us (for other than cause),
or Change in Control (as defined). Pension benefits payable
under this arrangement will be offset by any pension paid by to
Mr. Horton by AT&T or any prior employer.
AT&T entered into an employment/retention agreement with
Mr. Eslambolchi on January 5, 2001, that provided for
retention payments paid in 2001 and 2002. Mr. Eslambolchi
is required to repay AT&T if he voluntarily resigns other
than for Good Reason or is terminated for cause (each as
defined) prior to January 8, 2006. On July 24,
2003, AT&T entered into a special incentive agreement with
Mr. Eslambolchi pursuant to which Mr. Eslambolchi
received two special incentive awards, each in the amount of
$600,000, based on the attainment of performance metrics for the
years 2003 and 2004. The payments were made in January 2004 and
January 2005.
AT&T entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Cicconi dated July 29, 1998. The agreement
provided for his participation in employee benefit plans on the
same terms as other senior executives, and for compensation and
incentive arrangements that have been paid to Mr. Cicconi.
Mr. Cicconis compensation is set by the Compensation
and Employee Benefits Committee and is described in the section
entitled Summary Compensation Table
above.
|
|
|
Senior Officer Separation Plan |
In 1997, AT&T adopted the Senior Officer Severance Plan,
since renamed the Senior Officer Separation Plan, or Separation
Plan, for Senior Officers named by the AT&T board of
directors as participants. Under the Separation Plan, if covered
executives (i) are terminated by us for other than cause
(as defined in the Separation Plan) or (ii) self-initiate
termination for Good Reason (as defined in the Separation Plan),
they will be provided a severance payment equivalent to two
times the sum of their base salary plus target annual incentive
in effect at termination. The severance amount payable may be
deferred for five years with up to five annual payments
thereafter. Deferred amounts will be credited with interest
based on the interest rate formula in effect for the Senior
Management Incentive Award Deferral Plan on the Separation Plan
effective date, October 9, 1997. In addition, covered
executives who terminate under the terms of the Separation Plan
will be entitled to certain other post-termination benefits that
are generally made available from time to time to retired
executive officers and senior managers. The Separation Plan was
amended and restated as of January 1, 2003, to provide
enhanced severance payments in the event of a Change in Control,
as approved by the AT&T board of directors in October 2000,
and to provide protection in the form of a gross-up in the event
payments are subject to excise tax under Sections 280G and
4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. In the event of a Change in
Control, as such term is currently defined in the 2004 Plan, the
severance payment provided to a covered executive terminated
within two years following such Change in Control will be the
sum of three times base salary plus three times target annual
incentive.
120
Messrs. Dorman, Hannigan, Horton, Eslambolchi and Cicconi
are all covered executives under the Separation Plan.
AT&T maintains the AT&T Management Pension Plan, a
non-contributory pension plan that covers all management
employees, including the named executives listed in the
Summary Compensation Table above.
The normal retirement age under this plan is 65; however,
retirement before age 65 can be elected under certain
conditions.
The AT&T Management Pension Plan was amended in 1997 to
update the adjusted career average pay formula for computing
pensions. Effective August 1, 1997, the adjusted career
average pay formula was 1.6% of the average annual pay for the
three years ending December 31, 1996, times the lesser of
(a) 105% of the number of years of service prior to
January 1, 1997, or (b) the number of years of service
prior to January 1, 1997, plus one. Only the base salary
was taken into account in the formula used to compute pension
amounts for the named executives and other officers under the
adjusted career average pay formula. No service or compensation
after December 31, 1996, was used to calculate an
employees normal retirement benefit under the adjusted
career average pay formula.
Effective January 1, 1998, the AT&T Management Pension
Plan was further amended to convert the plan to a cash balance
design. Under the new design, a hypothetical cash balance
account was established for each participant for record-keeping
purposes. Each year a participants cash balance account is
credited with (a) a pay credit based on the
participants age and eligible pay for that year and
(b) an interest credit based on the participants
account balance as of the end of the prior year. Effective
January 1, 1998, an eligible participants cash
balance account received an initial credit based on a conversion
benefit equal to the participants normal retirement
benefit under the adjusted career average pay formula described
above multiplied by a conversion factor based on the
participants age as of December 31, 1996. The initial
pay credit was made as of January 1, 1998, based on the
participants eligible pay for 1997, and the initial
interest credit was made as of January 1, 1998, based on
the conversion benefit. Only base salary is considered eligible
pay under the cash balance design for the named executives and
other officers. Interest credits are calculated at the effective
annual rate of 7% for calendar years 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000;
5.5% for calendar years 2001 and 2002; and 4% thereafter. Under
the cash balance design, a participants benefit is
determined by projecting interest credits to his or her cash
balance account to age 65, converting the projected cash
balance account to an annuity, and reducing that annuity for
early commencement. A participants benefit under the plan
after conversion to the cash balance design will be no less than
the benefit calculated under the career average pay formula as
adjusted in 1997.
Federal laws place limitations on pensions that may be paid from
the pension trust related to the AT&T Management Pension
Plan. Pension amounts based on the AT&T Management Pension
Plan formula that exceed the applicable limitations will be
recorded as an operating expense.
AT&T also maintains the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan.
Under the plan, annual pensions for Messrs. Cicconi,
Dorman, Eslambolchi, Hannigan and Horton and other officers are
computed based on actual annual bonus awards under
AT&Ts Short-Term Incentive Plan. Pension benefits
under this plan will commence at the same time as benefits under
the AT&T Management Pension Plan. The annual pension amounts
payable under this plan are equal to no less than the greater of
the amounts computed under the Basic Formula or Alternate
Formula that were amended in 1997 and are described below.
For the three-year period ending December 31, 1996, 1.6% of
the average of the actual annual bonus awards times the lesser
of (a) 105% of the number of years of service prior to
January 1, 1997, or (b) the number of years of service
prior to January 1, 1997, plus one.
121
The excess of (a) 1.7% of the adjusted career average pay
over (b) 0.8% of the covered compensation base times the
lesser of (i) 105% of the number of years of service prior
to January 1, 1997, or (ii) the number of years of
service prior to January 1, 1997, plus one, minus the
benefit calculated under the AT&T Management Pension Plan
formula (without regard to limitations imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code). For purposes of this formula, adjusted career
average pay is the average annual compensation for the
three-year period ending December 31, 1996, without regard
to the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The
covered compensation base used in this formula is the average of
the maximum wage amount for which an employee was liable for
Social Security Tax for each year beginning with 1961 and ending
with 1996. In 1996, the covered compensation base was $27,600.
No service or compensation after December 31, 1996, is used
to calculate an employees normal retirement benefit under
the Basic Formula or Alternate Formula.
Effective January 1, 1998, the AT&T Non-Qualified
Pension Plan was further amended to convert the plan to a cash
balance pension design. Under the new design, a hypothetical
cash balance account is established for each participant for
record-keeping purposes. Each year a participants cash
balance account is credited with (a) an award credit based
on the participants age and short-term award paid in that
year and (b) an interest credit based on the
participants account balance as of the end of the prior
year. Effective January 1, 1998, an eligible
participants cash balance account received an initial
credit based on a conversion benefit equal to the
participants normal retirement benefit under the Basic
Formula described above multiplied by a conversion factor based
on the participants age as of December 31, 1996. The
initial award credit was made as of January 1, 1998, based
on the participants short-term award paid in 1997, and the
initial interest credit was made as of January 1, 1998,
based on the conversion benefit. Interest credits are calculated
at the effective annual rate of 7% for calendar years 1997,
1998, 1999 and 2000; 5.5% for 2001 and 2002; and 4% thereafter.
Under the cash balance design, a participants benefit is
determined by projecting interest credits to his or her cash
balance account to age 65, converting the projected cash
balance account to an annuity, and reducing that annuity for
early commencement in the same manner as under the AT&T
Management Pension Plan.
Officers and certain other management employees who were hired
at age 35 or over prior to January 1, 1997, are
covered by a supplemental AT&T Mid-Career Pension Plan. For
qualified managers retiring with at least five years at a senior
level, the plan provides additional credits at approximately
one-half the rate in the AT&T Management Pension Plan. The
number of credits is equal to the lesser of (i) actual
years of net credited service at retirement or (ii) the
employees age at the time of hire minus 30. Benefits under
the Mid Career Pension Plan were frozen as of December 31,
1996. In addition, the AT&T Mid-Career Pension Plan was
amended to provide that liability with respect to officers
actively employed on January 1, 1998 be transferred to the
AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan and converted to cash
balance as described above.
Pension amounts under the AT&T Management Pension Plan
formula, the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan or the AT&T
Mid-Career Pension Plan are not subject to reductions for Social
Security Benefits or other offset amounts. If
Messrs. Cicconi, Dorman, Eslambolchi, Hannigan and Horton
continue in the positions as previously stated and retire at the
normal retirement age of 65, the estimated annual pension amount
payable under the AT&T Management Pension Plan formula and
the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan would be $678,200,
$1,946,300, $1,062,900, $1,712,900 and $1,479,800, respectively.
Amounts shown are straight life annuity amounts not reduced by a
joint and survivorship provision that is available to these
officers.
In 1997, AT&T began purchasing annuity contracts to satisfy
the AT&T unfunded obligations to retired officers under the
AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan. In the event AT&T
purchases an annuity contract for any of the named executives,
the pension payments for such officer would vary from those set
forth above. In such instance there would be a tax gross-up
payment to the officer, and annuity benefits paid by the annuity
provider would be reduced to offset the tax gross-up payment.
The after-tax pension benefit would be the same as the after-tax
benefit the participant would otherwise have received under the
AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan. Receipt of the annuity is
contingent on the signing of a two-year non-competition
agreement that, should
122
competitive activity occur within the two-year period, gives us
the right to seek injunctive relief and to recapture any amounts
already paid out under the annuity contract.
As part of his employment agreement described above, AT&T
entered into a supplemental pension arrangement with
Mr. Dorman in 2000 which was amended in 2003. The pension
arrangement provides an annual benefit equal to 31.1% of his
final three-year average total cash compensation for a 2004
retirement, up to a benefit equal to 60% of such compensation
for a retirement in 2012 or later, offset by other pension
benefits paid by AT&T or prior employers. Pursuant to
Mr. Dormans arrangement, if he continues in his
position as previously stated and retires at the normal
retirement age of 65, the estimated annual pension amount
payable under the agreement that supplements the annual pension
amount payable under the AT&T Management Pension Plan and
the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan, but prior to offsets,
if any, due to pension benefits payable by former employers,
would be $1,779,700.
AT&T entered into a supplemental pension arrangement with
Mr. Hannigan in 2004. The pension arrangement provides an
annual benefit equal to 10% of his final three-year average
total cash compensation for a 2004 retirement, up to a benefit
equal to 50% of such compensation for a retirement in 2024 or
later, offset by other pension benefits paid by AT&T or
prior employers. Pursuant to Mr. Hannigans
arrangement, if he continues in his position as previously
stated and retires at the normal retirement age of 65, the
estimated annual pension amount payable under the agreement that
supplements the annual pension amount payable under the AT&T
Management Pension Plan and the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension
Plan, but prior to offsets, if any, due to pension benefits
payable by former employers, would be $783,400.
AT&T entered into a supplemental pension arrangement with
Mr. Horton in 2003. The pension arrangement provides an
annual benefit equal to 6% of his final three-year average total
cash compensation for a 2004 retirement, up to a benefit equal
to 50% of such compensation for a retirement in 2026 or later,
offset by other pension benefits paid by AT&T or prior
employers. Pursuant to Mr. Hortons arrangement, if he
continues in his position as previously stated and retires at
the normal retirement age of 65, the estimated annual pension
amount payable under the agreement that supplements the annual
pension amount payable under the AT&T Management Pension
Plan and the AT&T Non-Qualified Pension Plan, but prior to
offsets, if any, due to pension benefits payable by former
employers, would be $513,900.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
|
Indebtedness of Management |
There was no outstanding indebtedness to AT&T from any of
its directors or executive officers during 2004.
AT&T does not consider the following arrangement to
constitute indebtedness but AT&T is disclosing it because it
entails a potential contingent obligation by an executive
officer of AT&T to repay a compensation amount to AT&T.
Mr. Eslambolchi received Special Retention Payments on
January 10, 2001, and January 11, 2002, totaling
$3,835,473.53 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement
(see page 120). If, prior to the fifth anniversary of
Mr. Eslambolchis employment agreement
(January 8, 2006), he voluntarily resigns his employment
with us, other than for Good Reason (as defined), or is
terminated for cause (as defined), Mr. Eslambolchi will be
required to repay to AT&T the entire Special Retention
Payment of $3,835,473.53 within 90 days of such termination
of employment.
Other Information
A directors and officers liability policy was
purchased, effective July 31, 2004, with National Union
Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and other
insurance companies. The policy insures AT&T for certain
obligations incurred in the indemnification of its directors and
officers under New York law or under contract and insures
directors and officers when such indemnification is not provided
by us.
123
The cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form is paid
by us. In addition to solicitations by mail, a number of regular
employees of AT&T and of its subsidiaries may solicit
proxies in person or by telephone. AT&T has retained
Morrow & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of
proxies, at an estimated cost of $35,000 plus reimbursement of
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
The above notice and document are sent by order of the AT&T
board of directors.
Travel And Parking Directions
124
DESCRIPTION OF SBC CAPITAL STOCK
The following description of material terms of the capital
stock of SBC does not purport to be complete and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the restated certificate of
incorporation and by-laws of SBC, which documents are
incorporated by reference as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this document is a part, and to the
applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation
Law.
The authorized capital stock of SBC currently consists of
7,000,000,000 shares of SBC common stock and
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share, which we refer to as the SBC preferred
stock. As of the closing of business on February 28, 2005,
there were outstanding 3,303,437,610 shares of SBC common
stock, with an additional 129,912,356 shares issued and
held in treasury. There are no shares of SBC preferred stock
outstanding.
SBC Common Stock
The holders of SBC common stock are entitled to one vote per
share for each share held of record on all matters voted on by
stockholders, including the election of directors, and are
entitled to participate equally in dividends when and as such
dividends may be declared by the SBC board of directors out of
funds legally available therefor. As a Delaware corporation, SBC
is subject to statutory limitations on the declaration and
payment of dividends. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution
or winding up of SBC, holders of SBC common stock have the right
to a ratable portion of assets remaining after satisfaction in
full of the prior rights of creditors, including holders of
SBCs indebtedness, all liabilities and the aggregate
liquidation preferences of any outstanding shares of SBC
preferred stock. The holders of SBC common stock have no
conversion, redemption, preemptive or cumulative voting rights.
All outstanding shares of SBC common stock are, and the shares
of SBC common stock to be issued in the merger will be, validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
The transfer agent and registrar for SBC common stock is
EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43070,
Providence, RI 02940-3070.
SBC Preferred Stock
The restated certificate of incorporation of SBC provides that
the SBC preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one
or more series. The SBC board of directors is specifically
authorized to establish the number of shares in any series and
to set the designation of any series and the powers, preferences
and rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions
on each series of SBC preferred stock. The holders of SBC
preferred stock will have no preemptive rights. Shares of SBC
preferred stock will be issued in connection with the merger to
wholly-owned subsidiaries of AT&T, which will become
wholly-owned subsidiaries of SBC, but will not be issued or
transferred to third parties in connection with or as a result
of the merger.
No Stockholder Rights Plan
SBC currently does not have a stockholder rights plan.
125
COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
The rights of AT&T shareholders are currently governed by
the New York Business Corporation Law (referred to in this
document as the NYBCL) and the restated certificate of
incorporation and by-laws of AT&T. The rights of SBC
stockholders are currently governed by the Delaware General
Corporation Law (referred to in this document as the DGCL) and
the restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws of SBC.
Upon completion of the merger, the rights of AT&T
shareholders who become stockholders of SBC and the rights of
SBC stockholders will be governed by the DGCL and restated
certificate of incorporation and by-laws of SBC.
This section summarizes the material differences between the
NYBCL and AT&Ts restated certificate of incorporation
and by-laws, on the one hand, and the DGCL and SBCs
restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws, on the other
hand.
This section does not include a complete description of all
differences among the rights of AT&T shareholders and SBC
stockholders, nor does it include a complete description of the
specific rights of such holders. Furthermore, the identification
of some of the differences in the rights of such holders as
material is not intended to indicate that other differences that
may be equally important do not exist.
You are urged to read carefully the relevant provisions of the
DGCL and the NYBCL, as well as the restated certificate of
incorporation and by-laws of each of AT&T and SBC. Copies of
the restated certificates of incorporation and by-laws of
AT&T and SBC are available to you upon request. See
Where You Can Find More Information on page 144.
Classes and Series of Capital Stock
AT&T. The authorized capital stock of AT&T
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000,000 shares of AT&T common stock, having a par
value of $1.00 per share; and |
|
|
|
100,000,000 shares of AT&T preferred stock, having a
par value of $1.00 per share. |
SBC. The authorized capital stock of SBC consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
7,000,000,000 shares of SBC common stock, having a par
value of $1.00 per share; and |
|
|
|
10,000,000 shares of SBC preferred stock, having a par
value of $1.00 per share. |
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that a meeting of
shareholders shall be held annually for the election of
directors and the transaction of other business on a date fixed
by or under the by-laws of the corporation. The NYBCL also
requires notice of a shareholders meeting to be sent to all
shareholders of record entitled to vote at the meeting not less
than ten nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting.
The by-laws of AT&T provide that the annual meeting of
shareholders shall be held on such date, at such time and at
such place as may be fixed by resolution of the board of
directors. The by-laws of AT&T also provide that a notice of
the annual meeting as approved by the board of directors shall
be mailed not less than ten nor more than sixty days before the
meeting, directed to each shareholder entitled to vote at the
meeting.
SBC. The DGCL provides that an annual meeting of
stockholders shall be held for the election of directors on a
date and at a time designated by or in the manner provided in
the by-laws of the corporation. Any other proper business may
also be transacted at the annual meeting. The DGCL also requires
notices of stockholders meetings to be sent to all stockholders
of record entitled to vote at the meeting not less than ten nor
more than sixty days before the date of the meeting, except with
regard to a meeting where the stockholders are asked to vote
upon a business combination or a sale of all or substantially
all the corporations assets, in which case notice shall be
delivered not less than twenty nor more than sixty days before
the date of the meeting, with certain exceptions.
126
The DGCL also provides that if, for a period of thirty days
after the date designated by the by-laws for the annual meeting
of stockholders, or, if no date has been designated, for a
period of thirteen months after the latest to occur of the
organization of the corporation, its last annual meeting or the
last action by written consent to elect directors in lieu of an
annual meeting, there is a failure to hold an annual meeting or
to take action by written consent to elect directors in lieu of
an annual meeting, the Delaware Court of Chancery may summarily
order a meeting to be held upon the application of any
stockholder or director.
The by-laws of SBC provide that an annual meeting of the
stockholders for the election of directors to succeed those
whose terms expire and for the transaction of such other
business as may properly come before the meeting shall be held
at such place, on such date, and at such time as the board of
directors shall fix each year. The by-laws of SBC also provide
that written notice of all stockholders meetings shall be given
to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting not less
than ten nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting.
Special Meetings of Stockholders
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that special meetings of
shareholders may be called by the board of directors and by any
persons authorized in the certificate of incorporation or
by-laws of the corporation.
The NYBCL also provides that if, for a period of one month after
the date fixed by or under the by-laws for the annual meeting of
shareholders, or, if no date has been so fixed, for a period of
thirteen months after the last annual meeting, there is a
failure to elect a sufficient number of directors to conduct the
business of the corporation, the board of directors shall call a
special meeting for the election of directors. If the special
meeting is not called by the board of directors within two weeks
after the expiration of such period or if it is called but there
is a failure to elect such directors for a period of two months
after the expiration of such period, holders of ten percent of
the votes of the shares entitled to vote in an election of
directors may, in writing, demand the calling of a special
meeting for the election of directors.
The by-laws of AT&T provide that, subject to the rights of
the holders of any series of stock having a preference over the
common stock and except as may otherwise be required by law,
special meetings of the shareholders may be called at any time
only by the chairman of the board or the board of directors. The
meeting shall be held at such place as may be designated in the
notice of the meeting.
SBC. The DGCL provides that a special meeting of
stockholders may be called only by the board of directors or by
any persons authorized in the certificate of incorporation or
by-laws of the corporation.
The by-laws of SBC provide that special meetings of the
stockholders may be called at any time, either by the board of
directors or by the chairman of the board, and the chairman of
the board shall call a special meeting whenever requested in
writing to do so by stockholders representing two-thirds of the
shares of SBC then outstanding and entitled to vote at such
meeting. This request must specify the time, place and object of
the proposed meeting. Only business specified in the notice may
be conducted at a special meeting of the stockholders.
Quorum of Stockholders
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that the holders of a
majority of the votes of shares entitled to vote shall
constitute a quorum at a meeting of shareholders for the
transaction of any business, provided that when a specified item
of business is required to be voted on by a particular class or
series of shares, voting as a class, the holders of a majority
of the votes of shares of such class or series shall constitute
a quorum for the transaction of such specified item of business.
The NYBCL also provides that the certificate of incorporation or
by-laws of the corporation may provide for any lesser quorum of
not less than one-third of the votes of shares entitled to vote,
and that the certificate of incorporation may provide for a
greater quorum.
The by-laws of AT&T provide that at all meetings of
shareholders, the holders of forty percent of the shares
entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum, except as otherwise
required by law.
127
SBC. The DGCL provides that a quorum consists of a
majority of shares entitled to vote present in person or
represented by proxy, unless the charter or by-laws of the
corporation provide otherwise.
The by-laws of SBC provide that the presence in person or by
proxy of forty percent of the issued and outstanding shares of
SBC stock entitled to vote will constitute a quorum.
Stockholder Action Without a Meeting
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that whenever shareholders
are required or permitted to take any action by vote, such
action may be taken without a meeting upon the written consent
of the holders of all outstanding shares entitled to vote and
also allows, if the certificate of incorporation of the
corporation so provides, shareholder action without a meeting
upon the written consent of holders of outstanding shares having
not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize such action at a meeting at which all
shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
The restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws of
AT&T do not permit shareholder action by written consent of
holders of outstanding shares having not less than the minimum
number of votes necessary to authorize such action at a meeting
at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and
voted. Thus, holders of all outstanding shares entitled to vote
would need to execute a written consent for shareholder action
to be taken without a meeting.
SBC. The DGCL provides that, unless otherwise provided in
the certificate of incorporation of the corporation, any action
required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of stockholders
may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without
a vote, if a written consent or consents setting forth the
action taken is signed by the holders of outstanding stock
having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which
all shares entitled to vote upon such action were present and
voted.
Under the restated certificate of incorporation of SBC, no
action which is required to be taken or which may be taken at
any annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders of the
corporation may be taken by written consent without a meeting,
except where such consent is signed by stockholders representing
at least two-thirds of the total number of shares of stock of
SBC then outstanding and entitled to vote.
Stockholder Nominations and Proposals
AT&T. The by-laws of AT&T establish procedures
that must be followed for the nominations of directors and
shareholder proposals to be considered at its annual meeting of
shareholders. The shareholder must have given timely notice
thereof in writing to the Secretary of AT&T and such
nomination or proposal must be a proper matter for shareholder
action. To be timely, a shareholders notice must be
delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of
AT&T between 90 and 120 days prior to the first
anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting;
provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual
meeting is more than thirty calendar days before or more than
sixty calendar days after such anniversary date, notice by the
shareholder to be timely must be so delivered between
120 days prior to such annual meeting and the later of
90 days prior to such annual meeting and 10 days
following the day on which public announcement of the date of
such meeting is first made by AT&T.
To be in proper form, such shareholders notice shall set
forth:
|
|
|
|
|
specified information relating to each person whom the
shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a
director; |
|
|
|
as to any description of any other business desired to be
brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such
other business at the meeting and any material interest in such
other business of such shareholder and beneficial owner, if any,
on whose behalf the proposal is made; and |
|
|
|
as to the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial
owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is
made, |
128
|
|
|
|
|
the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on
AT&Ts books, and of such beneficial owner; and |
|
|
|
the class and number of shares of AT&T which are owned
beneficially and of record by such shareholder and such
beneficial owner. |
The by-laws of AT&T also provide that the nominations of
directors may be made at a special meeting of shareholders at
which directors are to be elected pursuant to AT&Ts
notice of meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
by or at the direction of the board of directors; or |
|
|
|
provided that the board of directors has determined that
directors shall be elected at such meeting, by any shareholder
who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice
to AT&T, who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting and
who complies with the notice procedures described above. |
Any such shareholders may nominate a person or persons (as the
case may be) if the shareholders notice shall be delivered
to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of AT&T
between 90 and 120 days prior to such special meeting or
the 10th day following the day on which public announcement is
first made of the date of the special meeting and of the
nominees proposed by the board of directors to be elected at
such meeting.
SBC. The by-laws of SBC establish procedures that must be
followed for a stockholder to submit a proposal to be voted on
by the stockholders of SBC at its annual meeting of stockholders
and a substantially similar procedure to be followed for the
nomination and election of directors. No business may be
proposed by a stockholder at the annual meeting of stockholders
without giving written notice to the Secretary of SBC between
120 and 150 days prior to the scheduled date of the
meeting. In the event, however, that less than
130 days notice or prior public disclosure of the
date of the meeting is given to stockholders, notice by the
stockholder to be timely must be received not later than the
tenth day following the earlier of the day on which such notice
of the date of the meeting was mailed or the day on which such
public disclosure was made. The stockholders notice must
set forth:
|
|
|
|
|
the name and record address of such stockholder; and |
|
|
|
the class or series and number of shares of capital stock of SBC
which are owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder. |
In addition, with respect to business to be brought before an
annual meeting, the stockholders notice must set forth:
|
|
|
|
|
a brief description of the business desired to be brought before
the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting the business
at the annual meeting; and |
|
|
|
any material interest the stockholder has in the proposal. |
Stockholders notices relating to director nominations must
be accompanied by a written consent of each proposed nominee
being named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected
and must include:
|
|
|
|
|
the name, age, business address and residence address of the
nominee; |
|
|
|
the principal occupation or employment of the nominee; |
|
|
|
the class or series and number of shares of capital stock of SBC
which are owned beneficially or of record by the
nominee; and |
|
|
|
certain other specified information relating to the nominee and
the stockholder making the nomination. |
If the chairman of the board determines that any such proposal
or nomination was not made in accordance with these procedures
or is otherwise not in accordance with law, the chairman of the
board may declare this at the meeting, and such defective
proposal or nomination will be disregarded.
129
Access to Corporate Records, Financial Statements and Related
Matters
AT&T. The NYBCL requires that each corporation shall
keep correct and complete books and records of account and shall
keep minutes of the proceedings of its shareholders, board and
executive committee, if any, and shall keep a record containing
the names and addresses of all shareholders, the number and
class of share held by each and the dates when they became the
owners of record. The NYBCL also provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
any person who is a shareholder of record of a corporation has
the right to examine, upon at least five days written
demand, in person or by agent or attorney, during usual business
hours, its minutes of the proceedings of its shareholders and
record of shareholders and to make extracts for any purpose
reasonably related to such persons interest as a
shareholder; and |
|
|
|
upon the written request of any shareholder, the corporation
must give or mail to such shareholder an annual balance sheet
and profit and loss statement for the preceding fiscal year,
and, if any interim balance sheet or profit and loss statement
has been distributed to its shareholders or otherwise made
available to the public, the most recent such interim balance
sheet or profit and loss statement. |
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor by-laws of AT&T
contain any express provision regarding access to corporate
records and a shareholders list, so the default rule described
above applies.
SBC. The DGCL provides that any stockholder, in person or
by attorney or other agent, upon written demand under oath
stating the purpose thereof, has the right during usual business
hours to inspect for any proper purpose, and to make copies and
extracts from the corporations stock ledger, a list of its
stockholders, its other books and records and a
subsidiarys books and records, to the extent that the
corporation has actual possession and control of such records or
the corporation could obtain such records through the exercise
of control over such subsidiary, with certain limitations.
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor by-laws of SBC
contain any express provision regarding access to corporate
records and a stockholders list, so the default rule described
above applies.
Amendments of Certificate of Incorporation
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, with limited exceptions,
amendments to a corporations certificate of incorporation
must be approved by vote of a majority of all outstanding shares
entitled to vote on the proposed amendment, except provisions of
a certificate of incorporation that require action by a class
vote or by a greater proportion of the voting power may only be
amended by such vote. In addition, an amendment that negatively
affects in certain ways holders of shares of a class or series
requires authorization by a majority of the votes of all
outstanding shares of that class or series.
The restated certificate of incorporation of AT&T provides
that the certificate of incorporation of the corporation shall
not be amended in any manner which would materially alter or
change the powers, preferences or special rights of a series of
AT&Ts authorized preferred shares designated as
subsidiary exchangeable preferred stock so as to affect them
adversely without the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of such preferred
stock, voting together as a single class.
SBC. Under the DGCL, after a corporation has received
payment for its capital stock, unless the certificate of
incorporation requires a greater vote, a proposed amendment to
the certificate of incorporation requires a declaration by the
board of directors of the amendments advisability and,
except with respect to a certificate of designations or a short
form merger, an affirmative vote of a majority of the voting
power of the outstanding stock entitled to vote and a majority
of the voting power of the outstanding stock of each class
entitled to vote.
The restated certificate of incorporation of SBC provides that
SBC reserves the right to amend and repeal the certificate of
incorporation as permitted by the DGCL.
130
By-Law Amendments
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, except as otherwise provided
in the certificate of incorporation, by-laws may be amended,
repealed or adopted by a majority of the votes cast by shares
entitled to vote in the election of any directors. If provided
in the certificate of incorporation or a by-law adopted by the
shareholders, by-laws also may be amended, repealed or adopted
by the board of directors by a specified vote, which may be
greater than the vote otherwise prescribed by the NYBCL, but any
by-laws adopted by the board of directors may be amended or
repealed by the shareholders entitled to vote.
The by-laws of AT&T provide that the by-laws may be amended
by the board of directors at any meeting by a majority vote of
the full board, or at two successive meetings of the board by a
majority vote of a quorum present, provided that the provision
relating to a shareholders right to one vote for each
share standing in his or her name on the record of shareholders
and to vote in person or by proxy shall not be rescinded,
amended or waived except at a shareholders meeting in accordance
with applicable state law.
SBC. Under the DGCL, the power to adopt, alter and repeal
by-laws is vested in the stockholders, except to the extent that
a corporations certificate of incorporation rests
concurrent power in the board of directors.
The restated certificate of incorporation of SBC provides that
the board of directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend
or repeal the by-laws of the corporation, except that any
by-laws of the corporation providing for the maximum number of
directors that may serve on the board of directors, or providing
for a classified board of directors with staggered terms of
office or requiring the approval by the shareholders or the
board of directors of any business combinations may only be
amended or repealed by a two-thirds majority vote of the total
number of shares of stock of the corporation then outstanding
and entitled to vote.
Vote on Mergers, Consolidations, Sales or Leases of Assets
and Certain Other Transactions
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, the consummation by a
corporation of a merger, consolidation or disposition of
substantially all of its assets must be approved:
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of corporations like AT&T that were in existence
on February 22, 1998 and that do not expressly provide in
their certificates of incorporation for a majority approval of
these transactions, by two-thirds of all the shares of the
corporation entitled to vote on the proposal; and |
|
|
|
in case of corporations that expressly provide in their
certificates of incorporation for a majority approval of these
transactions or that were incorporated after February 22,
1998, by the affirmative vote by the holders of a majority of
all outstanding shares of each class or series of shares
entitled to vote on the proposal. |
The restated certificate of incorporation of AT&T provides
that:
|
|
|
|
|
the required vote for authorization by shareholders of a merger
or consolidation of the corporation, pursuant to relevant
provisions of the NYBCL, shall be a majority of the votes of the
shares of the corporation entitled to vote, in addition to any
class vote that may be required by relevant provisions of the
NYBCL; and |
|
|
|
the required vote for approval by shareholders of a sale, lease,
exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
assets of the corporation, pursuant to relevant provisions of
the NYBCL, shall be a majority of the votes of all outstanding
shares of the corporation entitled to vote. |
SBC. Under the DGCL, a merger, consolidation or sale of
all or substantially all of a corporations assets must be
approved by a majority of the outstanding stock of the
corporation entitled to vote. However, unless required by its
certificate of incorporation, approval is not required by the
holders of the outstanding stock of a constituent corporation
surviving a merger if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement does not amend in any respect its
certificate of incorporation; |
|
|
|
each share of its stock outstanding prior to the merger will be
an identical share of stock following the merger; and |
131
|
|
|
|
|
the merger will not result in the issuance of shares
representing more than 20% of its common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the merger. |
Stockholder approval is not required for either the acquired or,
in most cases, the acquiring corporation in a merger if the
corporation surviving the merger is at least the 90% parent of
the acquired corporation. If the 90% parent is not the surviving
corporation, however, the otherwise required vote of at least a
majority of the parents outstanding stock entitled to vote
is required to approve the merger. No vote of the holders of the
subsidiarys outstanding stock is required in these
circumstances. In addition, unless required by its certificate
of incorporation, approval of the holders of a corporation will
not be required to approve a holding company reorganization of
the corporation pursuant to the merger of that corporation with
or into a single direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
that corporation, if the merger complies with certain provisions
of the DGCL applicable to holding company mergers.
Notwithstanding the statutory rule described above, the by-laws
of SBC also provide that certain business
combinations involving interested stockholders
(defined generally to be beneficial owners of 10% or more of the
voting stock of SBC or any person acquiring any voting stock, in
the two-year period prior to the business combination, from such
a person in a non-public offering) require approval by a vote of
the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of
capital stock of SBC entitled to vote generally for the election
of directors, voting as a single class, if not previously
approved by a majority of the members of the board who are not
affiliated with the interested stockholder (and those who became
directors after the time at which the interested stockholder
acquired its shares, if they are approved by a majority of the
unaffiliated directors) or unless certain minimum price and
procedural criteria are satisfied. The minimum price criteria
require that the consideration paid to SBCs stockholders
must be either cash or the same type of consideration paid by
the interested stockholder in acquiring the largest portion of
its SBC shares prior to the proposed business combination and
would generally have to be at least equal in value to the
greatest of:
|
|
|
|
|
the highest per share price paid by the interested stockholder
in acquiring any share of SBC common stock during the two years
prior to the announcement date of the proposed business
combination or in the transaction in which it became an
interested stockholder (whichever is higher); |
|
|
|
the fair market value per share of SBC common stock on the day
after such announcement date or on the date on which the
interested stockholder became an interested stockholder
(whichever is higher); or |
|
|
|
such fair market value per share multiplied by the ratio of: |
|
|
|
|
|
the highest per share price paid by the interested stockholder
in acquiring any share of SBC common stock during the two years
prior to such announcement to, |
|
|
|
the fair market value per share of SBC common stock on the first
day in such two-year period upon which the interested
stockholder acquired any shares of SBC common stock. |
This provision may only be amended or repealed by a vote of the
holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of
capital stock of SBC entitled to vote generally for the election
of directors, voting as a single class.
Preemptive Rights
AT&T. Except as otherwise provided in the NYBCL or in
the certificate of incorporation, the holders of equity shares
in a New York corporation incorporated prior to
February 22, 1998 are granted certain preemptive rights.
The restated certificate of incorporation of AT&T expressly
states that shareholders do not have any preemptive rights.
SBC. The DGCL provides that no stockholder of a
corporation incorporated after July 3, 1967 has any
preemptive rights to purchase additional securities of a
corporation unless the corporations certificate of
incorporation expressly grants those rights.
132
The restated certificate of incorporation of SBC expressly
states that stockholders do not have any preemptive rights.
Dividends
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, a corporation may declare and
pay dividends or make other distributions, except when it is
insolvent or would thereby be made insolvent, or when the
declaration, payment or distribution would be contrary to any
restrictions contained in its certificate of incorporation.
Except as otherwise provided in the NYBCL, dividends may be
declared and paid and other distributions may only be made out
of surplus, so that the net assets of the corporation remaining
after the declaration, payment or distribution must at least
equal the amount of its stated capital.
The restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws of
AT&T do not change these statutory provisions.
SBC. Under the DGCL, a board of directors may authorize a
corporation to declare and pay dividends and other distributions
to its stockholders, subject to any restrictions contained in
the corporations certificate of incorporation, either out
of surplus, or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for
the current or preceding fiscal year in which the dividend is
declared. However, a distribution out of net profits is not
permitted if a corporations capital is less than the
amount of capital represented by the issued and outstanding
stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution
of assets, until the deficiency has been repaired.
The restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws of SBC do
not change these statutory provisions.
Appraisal and Dissent Rights
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, appraisal rights are generally
available in connection with a merger or consolidation, except
that no appraisal rights are available:
|
|
|
|
|
to the shareholder of a parent corporation merging with its
subsidiary where the parent owns at least 90% of the
subsidiarys outstanding stock and certain additional
requirements are met; |
|
|
|
to the shareholder of the surviving corporation in a merger
(other than a merger described in the previous bullet item)
unless the merger adversely affects certain rights of the shares
held by the shareholder; or |
|
|
|
to a shareholder of shares of any class or series of stock
listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a
national market system security on an interdealer quotation
system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. |
Under the statutory provisions described above, since shares of
AT&T common stock are listed on the NYSE and other national
securities exchanges, AT&T common shareholders are not
entitled to appraisal rights in connection with a merger or
consolidation.
Appraisal rights are also available under the NYBCL in
connection with the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition
of all or substantially all of a corporations assets other
than a transaction wholly for cash where shareholder approval is
conditioned upon the corporations dissolution and the
distribution of all of the corporations net assets within
one year after the transaction.
Furthermore, appraisal rights are available in connection with a
share exchange between two corporations as authorized by the
NYBCL, except with respect to shares of a subject corporation
that are not acquired in the exchange or that are listed on a
national securities exchange or designated as a national market
system security on an interdealer quotation system operated by
the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
In addition, appraisal rights are available to a shareholder of
a subsidiary corporation that merges with its parent
corporation, or is acquired by it in a share exchange, where the
parent owns at least 90% of the subsidiarys outstanding
stock and certain additional requirements are met.
Appraisal rights are also available to a shareholder who is not
entitled to vote with respect to a plan of merger or
consolidation and whose shares will be canceled or exchanged in
the merger or consolidation for
133
cash or other consideration other than shares of the surviving
or consolidated corporation or another corporation.
SBC. The DGCL provides to stockholders who dissent from a
merger or consolidation of the corporation the right to demand
and receive payment of the fair value of their stock as
appraised by the Delaware Chancery Court. However, stockholders
do not have appraisal rights if the shares of stock they hold,
at the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to
vote at the meeting of stockholders to act upon the merger or
consolidation, or on the record date with respect to action by
written consent, are either:
|
|
|
|
|
listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a
Nasdaq National market security; or |
|
|
|
held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. |
Those stockholders, however, will have appraisal rights if the
merger agreement requires that they receive for their shares of
stock anything other than:
|
|
|
|
|
stock of the surviving corporation; |
|
|
|
stock of another corporation which is either listed on a
national securities exchange or designated as a Nasdaq National
market security or held of record by more than 2,000
stockholders; |
|
|
|
cash in lieu of fractional shares; or |
|
|
|
some combination of the above. |
The restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws of SBC do
not contain any additional provisions relating to
dissenters rights of appraisal.
SBC common stock is listed on the NYSE and other national
securities exchanges. Accordingly, depending on the
consideration to be paid in the transaction, holders of SBC
stock may not be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with
mergers or consolidations involving SBC.
Number and Qualification of Directors
AT&T. Subject to certain limitations, the NYBCL
permits the number of directors of a corporation to be fixed by
its by-laws, by action of the shareholders or by action of the
board of directors under a specific provision of a by-law
adopted by the shareholders. At each annual meeting of the
shareholders, directors are to be elected to hold office until
the next annual meeting, except for corporations with classified
boards. The NYBCL permits the certificate of incorporation or
the specific provisions of a by-law adopted by the shareholders
to provide that directors be divided into either two, three or
four classes. All classes must be as nearly equal in number as
possible.
The term of office of one class of directors shall expire each
year, with the terms of office of no two classes expiring the
same year.
Under the NYBCL, a director need not be a shareholder unless the
certificate of incorporation or by-laws so require.
The by-laws of AT&T provide that the number of directors
shall not be less than nine nor more than twenty-five, the exact
number of directors within such minimum and maximum limits to be
fixed and determined by the vote of a majority of the entire
board. Neither the restated certificate of incorporation nor
by-laws of AT&T provide for a classified board.
Neither the restated certificate of incorporation nor the
by-laws of AT&T require that directors be shareholders.
SBC. The DGCL permits the certificate of incorporation or
the by-laws of a corporation to contain provisions governing the
number and terms of directors. However, if the certificate of
incorporation contains provisions fixing the number of
directors, that number may not be changed without amending the
certificate of incorporation. The DGCL also permits the
certificate of incorporation of a corporation or a by-law
adopted by the stockholders to provide that directors be divided
into one, two or three classes, with staggered terms of
134
office of three years each (in the cases of boards that are
divided into three classes). The DGCL also permits the
certificate of incorporation to confer upon holders of any class
or series of stock the right to elect one or more directors to
serve for the terms and have the voting powers as are stated in
the certificate of incorporation. The terms of office and voting
powers of directors so elected may be greater or less than those
of any other director or class of directors.
Under the DGCL, a director need not be a stockholder unless the
certificate of incorporation or by-laws so require.
The by-laws of SBC provide that the number of directors of SBC
will be determined from time to time by a majority vote of the
total number of directors then serving in office, and the terms
of office of all directors who are in office immediately prior
to the closing of the polls for the election of directors at the
2005 annual meeting of stockholders shall expire at such time.
At each annual meeting of stockholders beginning with the 2005
annual meeting of stockholders, the directors shall be elected
to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and
until their respective successors shall have been duly elected
and qualified, subject, however, to prior death, resignation,
retirement, disqualification or removal from office.
Neither the restated certificate of incorporation nor the
by-laws of SBC require that directors be stockholders.
Filling Vacancies on the Board of Directors
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, newly created directorships
resulting from an increase in the number of directors and
vacancies occurring on the board of directors for any reason,
except the removal of directors without cause, may be filled by
vote of the board of directors. Unless the certificate of
incorporation or by-laws provide otherwise, a vacancy in a
directorship elected by holders of a particular class of shares
shall be filled by a vote of the other directors elected by
holders of the same class of shares. However, the certificate of
incorporation or by-laws may provide that such newly created
directorships or vacancies are to be filled by vote of the
shareholders. Unless the certificate of incorporation or the
specific provisions of a by-law adopted by the shareholders
provide that the board of directors may fill vacancies occurring
on the board of directors by reason of the removal of directors
without cause, these vacancies may be filled only by vote of the
shareholders. A director elected to fill a vacancy, unless
elected by the shareholders, will hold office until the next
meeting of shareholders at which the election of directors is in
the regular order of business and until his or her successor has
been elected and qualified.
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor by-laws of AT&T
contain any express provision regarding filling vacancies on the
board of directors, so the default rule described above applies.
SBC. Under the DGCL, unless otherwise provided in the
certificate of incorporation or the by-laws, vacancies on a
board of directors and newly created directorships resulting
from an increase in the authorized number of directors elected
by all of the stockholders having the right to vote as a single
class may be filled by a majority of the directors then in
office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining
director. However, in the case of a classified board of
directors, as provided by the DGCL, such vacancies and newly
created directorships may be filled by a majority of the
directors elected by such class or by the sole remaining
director so elected. In the case of a classified board of
directors, directors elected to fill vacancies or newly created
directorships shall hold office until the next election of the
class for which those directors have been chosen or until their
successors have been duly elected and qualified. In addition,
under the DGCL, if, at the time of the filling of any such
vacancy or newly created directorship, the directors in office
constitute less than a majority of the whole board of directors
(as constituted immediately before any such increase), the
Delaware Court of Chancery may, upon application of any
stockholder or stockholders holding at least 10% of the total
number of outstanding shares entitled to vote for such
directors, summarily order an election to fill any such vacancy
or newly created directorship, or replace the directors chosen
by the directors then in office.
The by-laws of SBC provide that vacancies on the board of
directors created by an increase in the number of directors
shall be filled by a majority vote of the directors then
remaining in office, and a successor elected to fill the vacancy
will serve until the next annual election of the class in which
such director served.
135
Removal of Directors
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that any or all of the
directors may be removed for cause by vote of the shareholders,
and, if provided by the certificate of incorporation or the
specific provisions of a by-law adopted by the shareholders,
directors may be removed by action of the board of directors. If
provided by the certificate of incorporation or the by-laws, any
or all of the directors may be removed without cause by vote of
the shareholders. However:
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of a corporation having cumulative voting, no
director may be removed when the votes cast against such
directors removal would be sufficient to elect the
director if voted cumulatively; and |
|
|
|
if a director is elected by the holders of shares of any class
or series, the director may be removed only by the applicable
vote of the holders of the shares of that class or series voting
as a class. An action to procure a judgment removing a director
for cause may be brought by the attorney general or by the
holders of 10% of the outstanding shares, whether or not
entitled to vote. |
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor the by-laws of
AT&T contains an express provision regarding the removal of
directors, so the shareholders may not remove a director without
cause.
SBC. The DGCL provides that a director or directors may
be removed, with or without cause, by the holders of a majority
in voting power of the shares then entitled to vote on the
election of directors, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
members of a classified board of directors may be removed only
for cause, unless the certificate of incorporation provides
otherwise; and |
|
|
|
in the case of a corporation having cumulative voting, if less
than the entire board of directors is to be removed, no director
may be removed without cause if the votes cast against the
directors removal would be sufficient to elect the
director if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire
board of directors or of the class of directors of which the
director is a part. |
SBC has neither a classified board nor cumulative voting, so SBC
stockholders may remove a director, with or without cause, by a
majority vote of stockholders entitled to vote on the election
of directors.
Limitation of Personal Liability of Directors and Officers
AT&T. The NYBCL permits corporations to eliminate or
limit the personal liability of directors to the corporation or
its shareholders for damages for any breach of duty in such
capacity except liability of a director:
|
|
|
|
|
whose acts or omissions were in bad faith, involved intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
|
|
|
who personally gained a financial profit or other advantage to
which he or she was not legally entitled; or |
|
|
|
whose acts violated certain provisions of New York law. |
The restated certificate of incorporation of AT&T provides
that no director shall be personally liable to the corporation
or any of its shareholders for damages for any breach of duty as
a director; provided, however, that the foregoing provision
shall not eliminate or limit:
|
|
|
|
|
the liability of a director if a judgment or other final
adjudication adverse to him or her establishes; |
|
|
|
|
|
that his or her acts or omissions were in bad faith or involved
intentional misconduct; |
|
|
|
a knowing violation of law or that he or she personally gained
in fact a financial profit or other advantage to which he or she
was not legally entitled; or |
|
|
|
that his or her acts violated Section 719 of the NYBCL,
which specifies certain actions for which directors of a New
York corporation will be held liable; or |
136
|
|
|
|
|
the liability of a director for any act or omission prior to the
adoption of this provision by the shareholders of the
corporation. |
SBC. The DGCL provides that a corporation may include in
its certificate of incorporation a provision eliminating or
limiting the personal liability of a director to the corporation
or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director. However, the provision may not eliminate or
limit the liability of a director for:
|
|
|
|
|
breach of the duty of loyalty; |
|
|
|
acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law; |
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends, certain stock repurchases or
redemptions; or |
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit. |
The restated certificate of incorporation of SBC provides that
no director of such corporation shall be liable to the
corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the
corporation or its stockholders; |
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or knowing violation of the law; |
|
|
|
under Section 174 of the DGCL; or |
|
|
|
for any transaction from which a director derived an improper
benefit. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
AT&T. Under the NYBCL, a corporation may indemnify
its directors and officers made, or threatened to be made, a
party to any action or proceeding, except for shareholder
derivative suits, if the director or officer acted in good
faith, for a purpose that he or she reasonably believed to be in
or, in the case of service to another corporation or enterprise,
not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, in
addition, in criminal proceedings had no reasonable cause to
believe his or her conduct was unlawful. In the case of
shareholder derivative suits, the corporation may indemnify a
director or officer if he or she acted in good faith for a
purpose that he or she reasonably believed to be in or, in the
case of service to another corporation or enterprise, not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no
indemnification may be made in respect of a threatened or
pending action that is settled or otherwise disposed of, or any
claim, issue or matter as to which such individual has been
adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the
extent that the court in which the action was brought, or, if no
action was brought, any court of competent jurisdiction,
determines, upon application, that, in view of all the
circumstances of the case, the individual is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for the portion of the
settlement amount and expenses as the court deems proper.
Any individual who has been successful on the merits or
otherwise in the defense of a civil or criminal action or
proceeding will be entitled to indemnification. Except as
provided in the preceding sentence, unless ordered by a court
pursuant to the NYBCL, any indemnification under the NYBCL as
described in the immediately preceding paragraph may be made
only if authorized in the specific case and after a finding that
the director or officer met the requisite standard of conduct by
the disinterested directors, if a quorum is available, or the
board of directors upon the written opinion of independent legal
counsel or the shareholders, if the quorum so directs or is
unavailable.
The by-laws of AT&T provide that AT&T is authorized by a
resolution of shareholders, a resolution of directors, or an
agreement providing for such indemnification, to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law, to provide indemnification
and to advance expenses to its directors and officers in respect
of claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon, arising
from, relating to or by reason of the fact that any such
director or
137
officer serves or served in such capacity with AT&T or at
the request of AT&T in any capacity with any other
enterprise.
SBC. The DGCL provides that, subject to certain
limitations in the case of derivative suits brought by a
corporations stockholders in its name, a corporation may
indemnify any person who is made a party to any third-party suit
or proceeding on account of being a director or officer of the
corporation against expenses, including attorneys fees,
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement reasonably
incurred by him or her in connection with the action, through,
among other things, a majority vote of a quorum consisting of
directors who were not parties to the suit or proceeding, if the
person:
|
|
|
|
|
acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation or, in some circumstances, at least not opposed to
its best interests; and |
|
|
|
in a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his
or her conduct was unlawful. |
To the extent a director, officer, employee or agent is
successful in the defense of such an action, suit or proceeding,
the corporation is required by the DGCL to indemnify such person
for reasonable expenses incurred thereby.
The by-laws of SBC provide for indemnification of officers and
directors as permitted by the DGCL.
Derivative Action
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
an action may be brought in the right of a domestic or foreign
corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, by a holder of
shares or of voting trust certificates of the corporation or of
a beneficial interest in such shares or certificates; |
|
|
|
in any such action, it shall be made to appear that the
plaintiff is such a holder at the time of bringing the action
and that he or she was such a holder at the time of the
transaction of which he or she complains, or that his or her
shares or interest therein devolved upon him by operation of law; |
|
|
|
in any such action, the complaint shall set forth with
particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure the
initiation of such action by the board or the reasons for not
making such effort; and |
|
|
|
such action shall not be discontinued, compromised or settled,
without the approval of the court having jurisdiction of the
action. |
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor by-laws of AT&T
contain any express provision regarding derivative actions, so
the default rule described above applies.
SBC. The DGCL provides that in any derivative suit
instituted by a stockholder of a corporation, it shall be
averred in the complaint that the plaintiff was a stockholder of
the corporation at the time of the transaction of which such
stockholder complains or that such stockholders stock
thereafter devolved upon such stockholder by operation of law.
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor by-laws of SBC
contain any express provision regarding derivative actions, so
the default rule described above applies.
Anti-Takeover and Ownership Provisions
AT&T. The NYBCL generally provides that a New York
corporation may not engage in a business combination with an
interested shareholder for a period of five years following the
interested shareholder becoming interested. Such a business
combination would be permitted where it is approved by the board
of directors before the interested shareholder becomes
interested, or within thirty days thereafter, if a good faith
proposal regarding a business combination is made in writing.
Covered business combinations include certain mergers and
consolidations, dispositions of assets or stock, plans for
liquidation or dissolution, reclassifications of securities,
recapitalizations and similar transactions. An
138
interested shareholder is generally a shareholder owning at
least 20% of a corporations outstanding voting stock.
In addition, New York corporations may not engage at any time
with any interested shareholder in a business combination other
than:
|
|
|
|
|
a business combination approved by the board of directors before
the stock acquisition, or where the acquisition of the stock had
been approved by the board of directors before the stock
acquisition; |
|
|
|
a business combination approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding voting stock not
beneficially owned by the interested shareholder at a meeting
for that purpose no earlier than five years after the stock
acquisition; or |
|
|
|
a business combination in which the interested shareholder pays
a formula price designed to ensure that all other shareholders
receive at least the highest price per share that is paid by the
interested shareholder and that meets certain other requirements. |
Although the NYBCL permits a corporation to opt out
of the rules described above by an amendment to its by-laws
approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes of the
outstanding voting stock of such corporation, excluding the
voting stock of interested shareholders and their affiliates and
associates, AT&T has not done so.
SBC. The DGCL contains a business combination statute
that protects domestic corporations from hostile takeovers and
from actions following such takeovers by prohibiting some
transactions once an acquiror has gained a significant holding
in the corporation. The DGCL generally prohibits business
combinations, including mergers, sales and leases of
assets, issuances of securities and similar transactions by a
corporation or a subsidiary with an interested
stockholder who beneficially owns 15% or more of a
corporations voting stock, within three years after the
person or entity becomes an interested stockholder, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors has approved, before the acquisition
date, either the business combination or the transaction that
resulted in the person becoming an interested stockholder; |
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the person
becoming an interested stockholder, the person owns at least 85%
of the corporations voting stock, excluding shares owned
by directors who are officers and shares owned by employee stock
plans in which participants do not have the right to determine
confidentially whether shares will be tendered in a tender or
exchange offer; or |
|
|
|
after the person or entity becomes an interested stockholder,
the business combination is approved by the board of directors
and authorized by the vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested
stockholder. |
These restrictions on interested stockholders do not apply under
some circumstances, including if the corporations original
certificate of incorporation contains a provision expressly
electing not to be governed by this provision of the DGCL, or if
the corporation, by action of its stockholders, adopts an
amendment to its certificate of incorporation or by-laws
expressly electing not to be governed by this provision of the
DGCL and the amendment is duly approved by the stockholders
entitled to vote on the amendment.
The by-laws of SBC contain additional provisions governing
certain business combinations involving interested stockholders.
See Vote on Mergers, Consolidations, Sale or
Lease of Assets or Certain Other Transactions above.
Voluntary Dissolution
AT&T. The NYBCL provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
dissolution shall be authorized at a meeting of shareholders by, |
|
|
|
|
|
for corporations the certificate of incorporation of which
expressly provides for dissolution to be authorized at a meeting
of shareholders or corporations incorporated after
February 22, 1998, a majority of the votes of all
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon; or |
139
|
|
|
|
|
for all other corporations, two-thirds of the votes of all
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, subject to limited
exceptions; and |
|
|
|
|
|
any corporation may adopt an amendment of its certificate of
incorporation providing that such dissolution shall be
authorized at a meeting of shareholders by a specified
proportion of votes of all outstanding shares entitled to vote
thereon, provided that such proportion may not be less than a
majority. |
The restated certificate of incorporation of AT&T states
that the required vote for authorization by shareholders of a
dissolution of the corporation shall be a majority of the votes
of all outstanding shares of the corporation entitled to vote on
the dissolution.
SBC. The DGCL provides that:
|
|
|
|
|
if it should be deemed advisable in the judgment of the board of
directors of any corporation that it should be dissolved, the
board, after the adoption of a resolution to that effect by a
majority of the whole board at any meeting called for that
purpose, shall cause notice to be mailed to each stockholder
entitled to vote on the dissolution of the adoption of the
resolution and of a meeting of stockholders to take action upon
the resolution; |
|
|
|
at the meeting a vote shall be taken upon the proposed
dissolution, and if a majority of the outstanding stock of the
corporation entitled to vote on the proposed dissolution shall
vote for the proposed dissolution, a certification of
dissolution shall be filed with the Secretary of State; and |
|
|
|
dissolution of a corporation may also be authorized without
action of the directors if all the stockholders entitled to vote
on the dissolution shall consent in writing and a certificate of
dissolution shall be filed with the Secretary of State. |
Neither the certificate of incorporation nor by-laws of SBC
contain any express provision regarding voluntary dissolution,
so the default rule described above applies.
140
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of SBC incorporated by
reference in SBCs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 (including schedules appearing
therein), and SBC managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, also incorporated by reference therein,
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in
its reports thereon, included and incorporated by reference
therein, and incorporated herein by reference. Such financial
statements and managements assessment have been
incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such reports
given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Cingular
Wireless LLC included in SBCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 have
been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report
thereon, included therein, and incorporated herein by reference.
Such consolidated financial statements are incorporated herein
by reference in reliance upon such report given on the authority
of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The audited financial statements of Omnipoint Facilities Network
II, LLC, not separately presented in this document, have been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm whose report thereon is incorporated by
reference herein. Such financial statements, to the extent they
have been included in the financial statements of GSM
Facilities, LLC, have been so incorporated in reliance on the
report of such independent registered public accounting firm,
given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
The financial statements and schedule and managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting (which is included in Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting)
incorporated in this document by reference to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of AT&T for the year ended
December 31, 2004 have been so incorporated in reliance on
the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of
said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the SBC common stock to be issued pursuant to
the merger will be passed upon for SBC by James D. Ellis, Senior
Executive Vice President and General Counsel of SBC. As of the
date of this document, Mr. Ellis owned less than 0.1% of
the shares (including options representing certain rights to
purchase shares) of SBC common stock. Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, counsel to SBC, and Wachtell, Lipton,
Rosen & Katz, counsel to AT&T, each will deliver an
opinion concerning the U.S. Federal income tax consequences
of the merger.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
In order to be considered for inclusion in AT&T proxy
statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
shareholder proposals must be received no later than
5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on November 25, 2005,
and otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act. Shareholder proposals should be sent via
registered, certified, or express mail to: Vice
President Law and Secretary, AT&T Corp.,
Room 3A123, One AT&T Way, Bedminster, New Jersey
07921-0752.
In addition, for business to be properly brought before
AT&Ts 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (other than
shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of
the Exchange Act), shareholders must give notice of the proposed
business in writing to the Secretary of AT&T at
AT&Ts principal executive offices not later than the
close of business on the 90th calendar day nor earlier than the
close of business on the 120th calendar day prior to the first
anniversary of AT&Ts 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that the date
of the 2006 Annual Meeting is more than 60 calendar days before
or more than 60 calendar days after such anniversary date, the
notice by the shareholder must be so delivered not earlier than
the close of business on the 120th calendar day prior to such
annual meeting but not later than the close of business on the
later of the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting or
the 10th calendar day
141
following the calendar day on which public announcement of the
date of such meeting is first made by AT&T. Such shareholder
notice must include:
|
|
|
|
|
the reasons for conducting the proposed business at the meeting
and any material interest in the proposed business of such
shareholder and beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the
proposal is made; |
|
|
|
the name and address of such shareholder giving the notice, as
they appear on AT&Ts books, and of the beneficial
owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and |
|
|
|
the class and number of shares of AT&T which are owned
beneficially and of record by such shareholder and such
beneficial owner. |
If the merger is completed by [l],
2006, AT&Ts 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will
not be held.
142
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters discussed in this document and in the documents
incorporated by reference in this document are forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, the information
concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of
SBC and AT&T and the synergies expected to result from the
merger set forth under The Merger
AT&Ts Reasons for the Merger,
Opinions of AT&Ts Financial
Advisors and SBCs Reasons for the
Merger. Readers are cautioned that the following important
factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this
document, and in the documents incorporated by reference in this
document, could affect the future results of SBC and AT&T:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain governmental approvals of the merger on
the proposed terms and schedule; |
|
|
|
the failure of AT&T shareholders to approve the merger; |
|
|
|
the risks that the businesses of SBC and AT&T will not be
integrated successfully; |
|
|
|
the risks that the cost savings and any other synergies from the
merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize
than expected; |
|
|
|
disruption from the merger making it more difficult to maintain
relationships with customers, employees or suppliers; |
|
|
|
competition and its effect on pricing, spending, third-party
relationships and revenues; |
|
|
|
the risks that Cingular LLC could fail to achieve, in the amount
and within the timeframe expected, the synergies and other
benefits expected from its acquisition of AT&T Wireless; |
|
|
|
final outcomes of various state and federal regulatory
proceedings and changes in existing state, federal or foreign
laws and regulations and/or enactment of additional regulatory
laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
risks inherent in international operations, including exposure
to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and political
risk; |
|
|
|
the impact of new technologies; and |
|
|
|
changes in general economic and market conditions. |
We caution you not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this document in the case of forward-looking statements
contained in this document, or the dates of the documents
incorporated by reference in this document in the case of
forward-looking statements made in those incorporated documents.
Except as may be required by law, neither SBC nor AT&T has
any obligation to update or alter these forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
143
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
SBC and AT&T file annual, quarterly and special reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC under the
Exchange Act. You may read and copy this information at the
SECs Public Reference Room, located at 450 Fifth
Street, N.W., Room 1024, Washington, DC 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain copies
of this information by mail from the SEC at the above address,
at prescribed rates.
The SEC also maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy
statements and other information that SBC and AT&T file
electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also inspect reports, proxy statements and other
information about SBC and AT&T at the offices of the NYSE,
20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.
SBC filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register
with the SEC the shares of SBC common stock to be issued to
holders of AT&T common stock in the merger. This document is
a part of that registration statement. As allowed by SEC rules,
this document does not contain all of the information you can
find in the registration statement or the exhibits to the
registration statement. You may obtain copies of the
Form S-4 (and any amendments to it) in the manner described
above.
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference
information into this document, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to another
document filed separately with the SEC. The information
incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this document,
except for any information superseded by information contained
directly in this document. This document incorporates by
reference the documents set forth below that SBC and AT&T
have previously filed with the SEC. These documents contain
important information about SBC and AT&T and their financial
condition.
The following documents listed below that SBC and AT&T have
previously filed with the SEC are incorporated by reference:
|
|
|
SBC SEC Filings |
|
Period |
|
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
Current Reports on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed January 11, 2005, January 26, 2005,
January 31, 2005, February 25, 2005, March 11,
2005. |
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for SBCs 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
|
The description of SBC common stock set forth in SBCs
registration statement on Form 10, dated November 15,
1983, filed
by SBC pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act
|
|
|
|
|
|
AT&T SEC Filings |
|
Period |
|
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
Current Reports on Form 8-K
|
|
Filed January 21, 2005, January 25, 2005,
January 31, 2005, February 2, 2005. |
To the extent that any information contained in any Current
Report on Form 8-K, or any exhibit thereto, was furnished
to, rather than filed with, the SEC, such information or exhibit
is specifically not incorporated by reference in this document.
All documents filed by SBC and AT&T pursuant to
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from
the date of this document to the date of the annual meeting
(other than the portions of those documents not deemed to be
filed) shall also be deemed to be incorporated herein by
reference.
144
You also may obtain copies of any document incorporated by
reference in this document, without charge, by requesting it in
writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at the
following addresses:
SBC Communications Inc.
175 E. Houston
San Antonio, TX 78205
Telephone: (210) 821-4105
AT&T Corp.
One AT&T Way
Bedminster, NJ 07921
Telephone: (908) 532-1680
Neither SBC nor AT&T has authorized anyone to give any
information or make any representation about the merger that is
different from, or in addition to, the information contained in
this document or in any of the materials that are incorporated
by reference into this document. Therefore, if anyone does give
you information of this sort, you should not rely on it. If you
are in a jurisdiction where offers to exchange or sell, or
solicitations of offers to exchange or purchase, the securities
offered by this document are unlawful, or if you are a person to
whom it is unlawful to direct these types of activities, then
the offer presented in this document does not extend to you. The
information contained in this document speaks only as of the
date of this document unless the information specifically
indicates that another date applies.
145
ANNEX A
[EXECUTION VERSION]
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
among
AT&T CORP.,
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC.
and
TAU MERGER SUB CORPORATION
Dated as of January 30, 2005
The following copy of the merger agreement includes all exhibits
and schedules except for the disclosure letter delivered by
AT&T to SBC and the disclosure letter delivered by SBC to
AT&T concurrently with entering into the merger agreement.
SBC and AT&T agree to furnish supplementally to the SEC,
upon request, a copy of each disclosure letter. SBC and AT&T
do not believe that the disclosure letters contain any
information that is material to the investment decision
presented by the merger, other than information that has already
been publicly disclosed, including elsewhere in this document.
For further discussion of the disclosure letters, see The
Merger Agreement.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARTICLE I
The Merger; Closing; Effective Time |
1.1.
|
|
The Merger |
|
|
A-1 |
|
1.2.
|
|
Closing |
|
|
A-1 |
|
1.3.
|
|
Effective Time |
|
|
A-1 |
|
ARTICLE II
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Surviving
Corporation |
2.1.
|
|
The Certificate of Incorporation |
|
|
A-2 |
|
2.2.
|
|
The By-Laws |
|
|
A-2 |
|
ARTICLE III
Directors and Officers |
3.1.
|
|
Directors |
|
|
A-2 |
|
3.2.
|
|
Officers |
|
|
A-2 |
|
3.3.
|
|
Parents Board of Directors |
|
|
A-2 |
|
ARTICLE IV
Effect of the Merger on Capital Stock; Exchange of Certificates |
4.1.
|
|
Effect on Capital Stock |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Cancellation of Shares |
|
|
A-3 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Merger Sub |
|
|
A-3 |
|
4.2.
|
|
Exchange of Certificates for Shares |
|
|
A-3 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Exchange Agent |
|
|
A-3 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Exchange Procedures |
|
|
A-3 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares; Voting |
|
|
A-4 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Transfers |
|
|
A-4 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
No Fractional Shares |
|
|
A-4 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Termination of Exchange Fund |
|
|
A-4 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates |
|
|
A-4 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Uncertificated Shares |
|
|
A-5 |
|
4.3.
|
|
No Dissenters Rights |
|
|
A-5 |
|
4.4.
|
|
Adjustments to Prevent Dilution |
|
|
A-5 |
|
4.5.
|
|
Company Stock Based Plans |
|
|
A-5 |
|
ARTICLE V
Representations and Warranties |
5.1.
|
|
Representations and Warranties of the Company |
|
|
A-6 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Organization, Good Standing and Qualification |
|
|
A-6 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Capital Structure |
|
|
A-7 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Corporate Authority; Approval and Fairness |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Governmental Filings; No Violations; Certain Contracts |
|
|
A-8 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Company Reports; Financial Statements |
|
|
A-9 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Absence of Certain Changes |
|
|
A-10 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Litigation and Liabilities |
|
|
A-11 |
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(h) |
|
Employee Benefits |
|
|
A-12 |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Compliance with Laws; Licenses |
|
|
A-14 |
|
|
|
(j) |
|
Material Contracts |
|
|
A-15 |
|
|
|
(k) |
|
Real Property |
|
|
A-15 |
|
|
|
(l) |
|
Right-of-Way Agreements |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
|
(m) |
|
Takeover Statutes |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
|
(n) |
|
Environmental Matters |
|
|
A-16 |
|
|
|
(o) |
|
Taxes |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
|
(p) |
|
Labor Matters |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
|
(q) |
|
Intellectual Property and IT Assets |
|
|
A-18 |
|
|
|
(r) |
|
GSA Action |
|
|
A-20 |
|
|
|
(s) |
|
Export Controls and Trade Sanctions |
|
|
A-20 |
|
|
|
(t) |
|
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
|
(u) |
|
Brokers and Finders |
|
|
A-21 |
|
5.2.
|
|
Representations and Warranties of Parent and Merger Sub |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Organization, Good Standing and Qualification |
|
|
A-21 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Capital Structure of Parent |
|
|
A-22 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Capitalization of Merger Sub |
|
|
A-22 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Corporate Authority; Approval and Fairness |
|
|
A-22 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Governmental Filings; No Violations; Etc |
|
|
A-23 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Parent Reports; Financial Statements |
|
|
A-23 |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Litigation and Liabilities |
|
|
A-24 |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Compliance with Laws |
|
|
A-25 |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Absence of Changes |
|
|
A-25 |
|
ARTICLE VI
Covenants |
6.1.
|
|
Interim Operations |
|
|
A-25 |
|
6.2.
|
|
Acquisition Proposals |
|
|
A-30 |
|
6.3.
|
|
Information Supplied |
|
|
A-31 |
|
6.4.
|
|
Shareholders Meeting; Subsidiary Preferred Stock |
|
|
A-32 |
|
6.5.
|
|
Filings; Other Actions; Notification |
|
|
A-32 |
|
6.6.
|
|
Access and Reports |
|
|
A-34 |
|
6.7.
|
|
Publicity |
|
|
A-34 |
|
6.8.
|
|
Employee Benefits |
|
|
A-34 |
|
6.9.
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
A-36 |
|
6.10.
|
|
Indemnification; Directors and Officers Insurance |
|
|
A-36 |
|
6.11.
|
|
Takeover Statutes |
|
|
A-37 |
|
6.12.
|
|
Regulatory Compliance |
|
|
A-37 |
|
6.13.
|
|
Potential Sale of Interests |
|
|
A-37 |
|
6.14.
|
|
Transfer Taxes |
|
|
A-38 |
|
6.15.
|
|
Taxation |
|
|
A-38 |
|
6.16.
|
|
Stock Exchange Listing and De-listing |
|
|
A-38 |
|
6.17.
|
|
GSA Action |
|
|
A-38 |
|
6.18.
|
|
Special Dividend |
|
|
A-38 |
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ARTICLE VII
Conditions |
7.1.
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Shareholder Approval |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Regulatory Consents |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Litigation |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
S-4 Registration Statement |
|
|
A-39 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
NYSE Listing |
|
|
A-39 |
|
7.2.
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Representations and Warranties |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Performance of Obligations of the Company |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Certain Litigation |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Governmental Consents |
|
|
A-40 |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Consents Under Agreements |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Tax Opinion |
|
|
A-41 |
|
7.3.
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of the Company |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Representations and Warranties |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Performance of Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub |
|
|
A-41 |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Tax Opinion |
|
|
A-41 |
|
ARTICLE VIII
Termination |
8.1.
|
|
Termination by Mutual Consent |
|
|
A-41 |
|
8.2.
|
|
Termination by Either Parent or the Company |
|
|
A-42 |
|
8.3.
|
|
Termination by the Company |
|
|
A-42 |
|
8.4.
|
|
Termination by Parent |
|
|
A-42 |
|
8.5.
|
|
Effect of Termination and Abandonment |
|
|
A-42 |
|
ARTICLE IX
Miscellaneous and General |
9.1.
|
|
Survival |
|
|
A-43 |
|
9.2.
|
|
Modification or Amendment |
|
|
A-44 |
|
9.3.
|
|
Waiver of Conditions |
|
|
A-44 |
|
9.4.
|
|
Counterparts |
|
|
A-44 |
|
9.5.
|
|
GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE; WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL |
|
|
A-44 |
|
9.6.
|
|
Notices |
|
|
A-45 |
|
9.7.
|
|
Entire Agreement |
|
|
A-45 |
|
9.8.
|
|
Third Party Beneficiaries |
|
|
A-45 |
|
9.9.
|
|
Obligations of Parent and of the Company |
|
|
A-45 |
|
9.10.
|
|
Definitions |
|
|
A-46 |
|
9.11.
|
|
Severability |
|
|
A-46 |
|
9.12.
|
|
Interpretation; Construction |
|
|
A-46 |
|
9.13.
|
|
Assignment |
|
|
A-46 |
|
Annex A Defined Terms |
|
|
A-A-1 |
|
Exhibit A Charter |
|
|
E-1 |
|
A-iii
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (hereinafter called this
Agreement), dated as of
January 30, 2005, among AT&T Corp., a New York
corporation (the Company), SBC Communications
Inc., a Delaware corporation (Parent),
and Tau Merger Sub Corporation, a New York corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (Merger
Sub, the Company and Merger Sub sometimes
hereinafter being referred to together as the
Constituent Corporations).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the respective Boards of Directors of each of the
Company, Parent and Merger Sub have, by resolutions duly
adopted, declared that the merger of Merger Sub with and into
the Company (the Merger) upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement
and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement are
advisable, the Board of Directors of Parent has approved this
Agreement and the Board of Directors of each of the Company and
Merger Sub has adopted this Agreement;
WHEREAS, it is intended that, for federal income tax purposes,
the Merger shall qualify as a reorganization under the
provisions of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the
Code); and
WHEREAS, the Company, Parent and Merger Sub desire to make
certain representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
connection with this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The Merger; Closing; Effective Time
1.1. The Merger. Upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, at the Effective Time (as defined in
Section 1.3) Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the
Company and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall
thereupon cease. The Company shall be the surviving corporation
in the Merger (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the
Surviving Corporation), and the
separate corporate existence of the Company, with all its
rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises, shall
continue unaffected by the Merger, except as set forth in
Article II. The Merger shall have the effects specified in
Section 906 of the New York Business Corporation Law, as
amended (the NYBCL).
1.2. Closing. The
closing of the Merger (the Closing)
shall take place (i) at the offices of Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, 125 Broad Street, New York, New York at
9:00 A.M. on the fifth business day following the day on
which the last to be satisfied or waived of the conditions set
forth in Article VII (other than those conditions that by
their terms are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to
the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions) shall be
satisfied or waived in accordance with this Agreement or
(ii) at such other place and time or on such other date as
the Company and Parent may agree in writing (the
Closing Date).
1.3. Effective Time.
As soon as practicable following the Closing, the Company and
Parent will cause a Certificate of Merger (the New
York Certificate of Merger) to be executed,
acknowledged and delivered to the Department of State of the
State of New York as provided in Section 904 of the NYBCL.
The Merger shall become effective on the date on which the New
York Certificate of Merger has been filed by the Department of
State of the State of New York or at such later time as may be
agreed by the parties in writing and specified in the New York
Certificate of Merger (the Effective
Time).
A-1
ARTICLE II
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws
of the Surviving Corporation
2.1. The Certificate of
Incorporation. At the Effective Time, the certificate of
incorporation of the Surviving Corporation (the
Charter) shall be amended in its
entirety to read as set forth on Exhibit A hereto, until
thereafter duly amended as provided therein or by applicable
Laws (as defined in Section 5.1(i)).
2.2. The By-Laws. The
by-laws of Merger Sub in effect at the Effective Time shall be
the by-laws of the Surviving Corporation (the
By-Laws), until thereafter amended as
provided therein or by applicable Laws.
ARTICLE III
Directors and Officers
3.1. Directors. The
directors of Merger Sub at the Effective Time shall, from and
after the Effective Time, be the directors of the Surviving
Corporation until their successors shall have been duly elected
or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death,
resignation or removal in accordance with the Charter and the
By-Laws.
3.2. Officers. The
officers of Merger Sub at the Effective Time shall, from and
after the Effective Time, be the officers of the Surviving
Corporation until their successors shall have been duly elected
or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death,
resignation or removal in accordance with the Charter and the
By-Laws.
3.3. Parents Board of
Directors. As of the Effective Time, (a) Parent
shall increase the size of its Board of Directors to enable it
to appoint David W. Dorman plus two other members of the Board
of Directors of the Company selected by mutual agreement of
Parent and the Company (the Director
Designees) as members of such Board of Directors
and (b) the Parent Board of Directors shall appoint each of
the Director Designees to such Board of Directors, to serve in
such capacities until their successors shall have been duly
elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death,
resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of
incorporation and by-laws of Parent.
ARTICLE IV
Effect of the Merger on Capital Stock;
Exchange of Certificates
4.1. Effect on Capital
Stock. At the Effective Time, as a result of the Merger
and without any action on the part of the holder of any capital
stock of the Company:
|
|
|
(a) Merger Consideration. (i) Each share of
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of the Company (a
Share and, collectively, the
Shares) issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than
(i) Shares owned by Parent or any direct or indirect
Subsidiary (as defined in Section 5.1(a)) of Parent and
(ii) any Shares owned by the Company or any direct or
indirect Subsidiary of the Company except, in the case of
clauses (i) and (ii), for any such Shares held on behalf of
third parties (each, an Excluded Share
and collectively, Excluded Shares))
(each such Share not constituting an Excluded Share, an
Outstanding Share and, collectively,
the Outstanding Shares) shall be
converted into, and become exchangeable for, 0.77942 (the
Exchange Ratio) common shares (the
Per Share Merger Consideration), par
value $1.00 per share, of Parent (Parent Common
Stock). At the Effective Time, all of the Shares
shall cease to be outstanding, shall be cancelled and retired
and shall cease to exist, and each certificate (a
Certificate) formerly representing any
of the Shares (other than Excluded Shares) shall thereafter
represent only the right to receive the Per Share Merger
Consideration and the right, if any, to receive pursuant to
Section 4.2(e) cash in lieu of fractional |
A-2
|
|
|
shares into which such Shares have been converted pursuant to
this Section 4.1(a) and any dividend or distribution with
respect to shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant to
Section 4.2(c). |
|
|
(ii) Each Substitute Preferred Share (as defined in
Section 6.4(b)) issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall be converted into, and become
exchangeable for, one Parent Preferred Share (as defined in
Section 5.2(b)) having (A) a value substantially
equivalent, in the judgment of Parent, to such Substitute
Preferred Share as of the Effective Time, (B) such other
terms as are necessary to ensure that such Parent Preferred
Shares would not constitute non-qualified preferred
stock under Section 351(g) of the Code and
(C) such other terms, if any, as are reasonably necessary
so that the terms of such Parent Preferred Shares do not prevent
the delivery of the tax opinions set forth in
Sections 7.2(f) and 7.3(c) (collectively, the
New Parent Preferred Shares). At the
Effective Time, all of the Substitute Preferred Shares shall
cease to be outstanding, shall be cancelled and retired and
shall cease to exist, and each certificate formerly representing
such shares shall thereafter represent only the right to receive
New Parent Preferred Shares in accordance with the foregoing. |
|
|
(b) Cancellation of Shares. Each Excluded Share
shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the
part of the holder thereof, cease to be outstanding, shall be
cancelled and retired without payment of any consideration
therefor and shall cease to exist. |
|
|
(c) Merger Sub. At the Effective Time, each share of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Merger Sub
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be converted into one share of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of the Surviving Corporation. |
4.2. Exchange of Certificates
for Shares.
(a) Exchange Agent. As of the Effective Time, Parent
shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with an exchange
agent selected by Parent with the Companys prior approval,
which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed (the
Exchange Agent), for the benefit of
the holders of Outstanding Shares, certificates representing the
shares of Parent Common Stock to be exchanged for Outstanding
Shares in respect of the Per Share Merger Consideration to be
paid in the Merger and, after the Effective Time, if applicable,
any cash and dividends or other distributions with respect to
the Parent Common Stock to be paid or to be issued pursuant to
Section 4.2(e) or 4.2(c) in exchange for Outstanding Shares
(such certificates for shares of Parent Common Stock, together
with the amount of any cash payable pursuant to
Section 4.2(e) in lieu of fractional shares and dividends
or other distributions payable with respect thereto pursuant to
Section 4.2(c), being hereinafter referred to as the
Exchange Fund).
(b) Exchange Procedures. Appropriate transmittal
materials, to be reasonably agreed upon by Parent and the
Company, shall be provided as soon as practicable after the
Effective Time by the Exchange Agent to holders of record of
Outstanding Shares converted in the Merger, advising such
holders of the effectiveness of the Merger and the procedure for
surrendering the Certificates to the Exchange Agent. Upon the
surrender of a Certificate (or affidavit of loss in lieu
thereof) to the Exchange Agent in accordance with the terms of
such transmittal materials, the holder of such Certificate shall
be entitled to receive in exchange therefor (1) a
certificate representing that number of whole shares of Parent
Common Stock that such holder is entitled to receive pursuant to
this Article IV, (2) a check in the amount (after
giving effect to any required tax withholdings) of (A) any
cash payable pursuant to Section 4.2(e) in lieu of
fractional shares plus (B) any unpaid non-stock dividends
and any other dividends or other distributions that such holder
has the right to receive pursuant to Section 4.2(c), and,
in each case, the Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be
cancelled. No interest will be paid or accrued on any amount
payable upon due surrender of the Certificates. In the event of
a transfer of ownership of Shares that is not registered in the
transfer records of the Company, a certificate representing the
proper number of shares of Parent Common Stock, together with a
check for any cash to be paid upon due surrender of the
Certificate and any other dividends or distributions in respect
thereof, may be issued and/or paid to such a transferee if the
Certificate formerly representing such Shares is presented to
the Exchange Agent, accompanied by all documents required to
evidence and effect such transfer and to evidence that any
applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid or are not
applicable. If any certificate for shares of Parent Common Stock
is to be issued in a name other than that in which the
Certificate surrendered in exchange therefor is registered, it
shall be a condition of such exchange that the Person (as
A-3
defined below) requesting such exchange shall pay any transfer
or other taxes required by reason of the issuance of
certificates for shares of Parent Common Stock in a name other
than that of the registered holder of the Certificate
surrendered, or shall establish to the satisfaction of Parent or
the Exchange Agent that such tax has been paid or is not
applicable.
For the purposes of this Agreement, the term
Person shall mean any individual,
corporation (including not-for-profit), general or limited
partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, estate,
trust, association, organization, Governmental Entity (as
defined in Section 5.1(d)(i)) or other entity of any kind
or nature.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares;
Voting. (i) All shares of Parent Common Stock to be
issued pursuant to the Merger shall be deemed issued and
outstanding as of the Effective Time and whenever a dividend or
other distribution is declared by Parent in respect of the
Parent Common Stock, the record date for which is after the
Effective Time, that declaration shall include dividends or
other distributions in respect of all shares issuable pursuant
to this Agreement. No dividends or other distributions in
respect of the Parent Common Stock shall be paid to any holder
of any unsurrendered Certificate until such Certificate is
surrendered for exchange in accordance with this
Article IV. Subject to the effect of applicable laws,
following surrender of any such Certificate, there shall be
issued and/or paid to the holder of the certificates
representing whole shares of Parent Common Stock issued in
exchange therefor, without interest, (A) at the time of
such surrender, the dividends or other distributions with a
record date after the Effective Time theretofore payable with
respect to such whole shares of Parent Common Stock and not paid
and (B) at the appropriate payment date, the dividends or
other distributions payable with respect to such whole shares of
Parent Common Stock with a record date after the Effective Time
but with a payment date subsequent to surrender.
(ii) Holders of unsurrendered Certificates shall be
entitled to vote after the Effective Time at any meeting of
Parent stockholders the number of whole shares of Parent Common
Stock represented by such Certificates, regardless of whether
such holders have exchanged their Certificates.
(d) Transfers. After the Effective Time, there shall
be no transfers on the stock transfer books of the Company of
the Outstanding Shares.
(e) No Fractional Shares. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Agreement, no fractional shares of Parent
Common Stock will be issued and any holder of Shares entitled to
receive a fractional share of Parent Common Stock but for this
Section 4.2(e) shall be entitled to receive a cash payment
in lieu thereof, which payment shall be calculated by the
Exchange Agent and shall represent such holders
proportionate interest in a share of Parent Common Stock based
on the average of the per share closing prices of Parent Common
Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the
NYSE) composite transactions reporting
system for the 20 trading days ending on the fifth trading day
prior to the Closing Date.
(f) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the
Exchange Fund (including the proceeds of any investments thereof
and any shares of Parent Common Stock) that remains unclaimed by
the shareholders of the Company for 180 days after the
Effective Time shall be delivered to Parent. Any shareholders of
the Company who have not theretofore complied with this
Article IV shall thereafter look only to Parent for
delivery of any cash or any shares of Parent Common Stock and
payment of any cash, dividends and other distributions in
respect thereof payable or deliverable pursuant to
Section 4.1, Section 4.2(c) and Section 4.2(e)
upon due surrender of their Certificates (or affidavits of loss
in lieu thereof), in each case, without any interest thereon.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Parent, the Surviving
Corporation, the Exchange Agent or any other Person shall be
liable to any former holder of Shares for any amount properly
delivered to a public official pursuant to applicable abandoned
property, escheat or similar Laws (as defined in
Section 5.1(i)(i)).
(g) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates. In the
event any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person
claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and,
if required by Parent, the posting by such Person of a bond in
customary amount and upon such terms as may be required by
Parent as indemnity against any claim that may be made against
it or the
A-4
Surviving Corporation with respect to such Certificate, the
Exchange Agent will issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or
destroyed Certificate the cash or the shares of Parent Common
Stock and any cash, unpaid dividends or other distributions in
respect thereof that would be payable or deliverable pursuant to
this Agreement had such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate
been surrendered.
(h) Uncertificated Shares. In the case of any shares
of Company Common Stock that are not represented by
certificates, the Exchange Agent shall issue at the Effective
Time Parent Common Stock to the holders of such shares without
any action by such holders, and the parties shall make
appropriate adjustments to this Section 4.2 to assure the
equivalent treatment thereof.
4.3. No Dissenters
Rights. In accordance with Section 910 of the
NYBCL, no appraisal rights shall be available to holders of
Shares in connection with the Merger.
4.4. Adjustments to Prevent
Dilution. In the event that the Company changes the
number of Shares or securities convertible or exchangeable into
or exercisable for Shares, or Parent changes the number of
shares of Parent Common Stock or securities convertible or
exchangeable into or exercisable for shares of Parent Common
Stock, issued and outstanding prior to the Effective Time as a
result of a reclassification, stock split (including a reverse
stock split), stock dividend or distribution, recapitalization,
merger, subdivision, issuer tender or exchange offer, or other
similar transaction, the Exchange Ratio shall be equitably
adjusted.
4.5. Company Stock Based
Plans.
(a) At the Effective Time, each outstanding option to
purchase Shares (a Company Option)
under the Companys stock-based benefit plans and under
individual employment agreements to which the Company is a party
(the Company Stock Plans), whether
vested or unvested, shall be converted into an option to acquire
a number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the product
(rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (x) the number
of Shares subject to the Company Option immediately prior to the
Effective Time and (y) the Exchange Ratio, at an exercise
price per share (rounded down to the nearest whole cent) equal
to (A) the exercise price per Share of such Company Option
immediately prior to the Effective Time divided by (B) the
Exchange Ratio; provided, however, that the
exercise price and the number of shares of Parent Common Stock
purchasable pursuant to the Company Options shall be determined
in a manner consistent with the requirements of
Section 409A of the Code; provided, further,
that in the case of any Company Option to which Section 422
of the Code applies, the exercise price and the number of shares
of Parent Common Stock purchasable pursuant to such option shall
be determined in accordance with the foregoing, subject to such
adjustments as are necessary in order to satisfy the
requirements of Section 424(a) of the Code. Except as
specifically provided above, following the Effective Time, each
Company Option shall continue to be governed by the same terms
and conditions as were applicable under such Company Option
immediately prior to the Effective Time. At or prior to the
Effective Time, the Company shall adopt appropriate amendments
to the Company Stock Plans, if applicable, and the Board of
Directors of the Company shall adopt appropriate resolutions, if
applicable, to effectuate the provisions of this
Section 4.5(a). Parent shall take all actions as are
necessary for the assumption of the Company Stock Plans pursuant
to this Section 4.5, including the reservation, issuance
(subject to Section 4.5(c)) and listing of Parent Common
Stock as necessary to effect the transactions contemplated by
this Section 4.5.
(b) At the Effective Time, each right of any kind,
contingent or accrued, to acquire or receive Shares or benefits
measured by the value of Shares, and each award of any kind
consisting of Shares that may be held, awarded, outstanding,
payable or reserved for issuance under the Company Stock Plans
and any other Compensation and Benefits Plans, other than
Company Options (the Company Awards),
shall be deemed to be converted into the right to acquire or
receive benefits measured by the value of (as the case may be)
the number of shares of Parent Common Stock equal to the product
of (x) the number of Shares subject to such Company Award
immediately prior to the Effective Time and (y) the
Exchange Ratio, and each such right shall otherwise be subject
to the terms and conditions applicable to such right under the
relevant Company Stock Plan or other Compensation and Benefit
Plan. At or prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall adopt
appropriate amendments to the Company Stock Plans and such
Compensation and Benefits Plans, if
A-5
applicable, and the Board of Directors of the Company shall
adopt appropriate resolutions, if applicable, to effectuate the
provisions of this Section 4.5(b).
(c) If registration of any interests in the Company Stock
Plans or other Compensation and Benefit Plans or the shares of
Parent Common Stock issuable thereunder is required under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), Parent shall file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) prior to
the Effective Time a registration statement on Form S-3 or
Form S-8, as the case may be (or any successor form), or
another appropriate form with respect to such interests or
Parent Common Stock, and shall use its reasonable best efforts
to have such registration statement declared effective by the
SEC as of the Effective Time and to maintain the effectiveness
of such registration statement (and maintain the current status
of the prospectus or prospectuses contained therein and comply
with any applicable state securities or blue sky
laws) for so long as the relevant Company Stock Plans or other
Compensation and Benefit Plans, as applicable, remain in effect
and such registration of interests therein or the shares of
Parent Common Stock issuable thereunder (and compliance with any
such state laws) continues to be required. As soon as
practicable after the registration of such interests or shares,
as applicable, Parent shall deliver to the holders of Company
Options and Company Awards appropriate notices setting forth
such holders rights pursuant to the respective Company
Stock Plans and agreements evidencing the grants of such Company
Options and Company Awards, and stating that such Company
Options and Company Awards and agreements have been assumed by
Parent and shall continue in effect on the same terms and
conditions (subject to the adjustments required by this
Section 4.5 after giving effect to the Merger and the terms
of the Company Stock Plans).
(d) Without limiting the applicability of the preceding
paragraph, the Company and Parent shall take all necessary
action to ensure that the Surviving Corporation will not be
required to deliver Shares or other capital stock of the Company
to any Person pursuant to or in settlement of Company Options or
Company Awards after the Effective Time. At or prior to the
Effective Time, the Company shall adopt appropriate amendments
to all Company Stock Plans conferring any rights to Shares or
other capital stock of the Company, if applicable, and the Board
of Directors of the Company shall adopt appropriate resolutions,
if applicable, to effectuate the provisions of this
Section 4.5(d).
(e) The Board of Directors of the Company (or a committee
thereof to the extent applicable) shall take all necessary
actions to ensure that the terms of the Company Options and
Company Awards then outstanding under each Company Stock Plan
are equitably adjusted to take into account the payment of the
Special Dividend pursuant to Section 6.18 of this
Agreement, and that any applicable performance goals with
respect to Company Options, Company Awards and other Company
compensation are, if impacted by the Special Dividend, equitably
adjusted.
ARTICLE V
Representations and Warranties
5.1. Representations and
Warranties of the Company. Except as set forth in the
disclosure letter (subject to Section 9.12(c) of this
Agreement) delivered to Parent by the Company prior to entering
into this Agreement (the Company Disclosure
Letter) or, to the extent the qualifying nature of
such disclosure with respect to a specific representation and
warranty is readily apparent therefrom, as set forth in the
Company Reports (as defined in Section 5.1(e)) filed on or
after January 1, 2004 and prior to the date hereof
(excluding any disclosures included in any such Company Report
that are predictive or forward-looking in nature), the Company
hereby represents and warrants to Parent and Merger Sub that:
|
|
|
(a) Organization, Good Standing and Qualification.
Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is a legal entity duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws
of its respective jurisdiction of organization and has all
requisite corporate or similar power and authority to own, lease
and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as presently conducted and is qualified to do business
and is in good standing as a foreign corporation in each
jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its
assets or properties or conduct of its business requires such
qualification, except where the failure to be so organized,
validly existing, qualified or in good standing, or to have such
power |
A-6
|
|
|
or authority, would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect
(as defined below). The Company has made available to Parent
complete and correct copies of the Companys certificate of
incorporation and by-laws, each as amended to date, and each as
so delivered is in full force and effect. As used in this
Agreement, the term
(i) Subsidiary means, with
respect to any Person, any other Person of which at least a
majority of the securities or ownership interests having by
their terms ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the
board of directors or other persons performing similar functions
is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by such Person or
by one or more of its respective Subsidiaries or by such Person
and any one or more of its respective Subsidiaries,
provided, however, that Cingular LLC shall be
considered a Subsidiary of Parent solely for purposes of
Sections 5.2(a), 5.2(e), 5.2(f)(iv) (subject to the
limitation set forth in Section 5.2(f)(iv)), 5.2(g),
5.2(h), 5.2(i) and 6.1(iii) (subject to the limitation set forth
in Section 6.1(iii)), and (ii) Material
Adverse Effect means (x) a material adverse
effect on the financial condition, assets, liabilities, business
or results of operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries
taken as a whole, excluding any such effect resulting from
(I) changes in political or regulatory conditions
generally, (II) changes or conditions generally affecting
the U.S. economy or financial markets or generally
affecting any of the segments of the telecommunications industry
in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries operates or
(III) the announcement or consummation of this Agreement,
or (y) an effect that would prevent, materially delay or
materially impair the ability of the Company to consummate the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Any determination of Material Adverse
Effect with respect to the Company shall exclude
the matters set forth in Section 5.1(a) of the Company
Disclosure Letter. |
|
|
(b) Capital Structure. The authorized capital stock
of the Company consists of (x) 2,500,000,000 Shares,
of which 799,007,457 Shares were outstanding as of the
close of business on January 27, 2005, and
(y) 100,000,000 preferred shares, par value $1.00 per
share (the Company Preferred Shares),
of which 2,000,000 shares were designated Subsidiary
Exchangeable Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the
Subsidiary Preferred Shares).
768,391.4 Subsidiary Preferred Shares were outstanding as of the
close of business on January 28, 2005. Each of the
outstanding Subsidiary Preferred Shares is held by a
wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company, and the Subsidiaries of
the Company hold no other shares of capital stock of the
Company, or securities or obligations convertible or
exchangeable into or exercisable for such capital stock. All of
the outstanding Shares have been duly authorized and validly
issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. The Company has no
Shares or Company Preferred Shares reserved for issuance, except
that, as of January 27, 2005, there were an aggregate of
30,733,276 Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to the
Company Stock Plans. Section 5.1(b) of the Company
Disclosure Letter contains a correct and complete list as of
December 31, 2004 of (i) the number of outstanding
Company Options under each of the Company Stock Plans, the
exercise prices of all Company Options and the number of Shares
issuable at each such exercise price and (ii) the number of
outstanding Company Awards under each of the Company Stock
Plans, the date of grant and number of Shares subject thereto.
From December 31, 2004 to the date hereof the Company has
not issued any shares of Common Stock except pursuant to the
exercise of Company Options and the settlement of Company Awards
outstanding on December 31, 2004 in accordance with their
terms, and except for issuances under the Companys
dividend reinvestment plan. From December 31, 2004 through
the date hereof, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
has granted or issued any Company Options or Company Awards.
Each of the outstanding shares of capital stock or other
securities of each of the Companys Subsidiaries has been
duly authorized and validly issued and is fully paid and
nonassessable and, to the extent owned by the Company or by a
direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company, is
owned free and clear of any lien, charge, pledge, security
interest, claim or other encumbrance (each, a
Lien). Except as set forth above, as
of the date of this Agreement, there are no preemptive or other
outstanding rights, options, warrants, conversion rights, stock
appreciation rights, redemption rights, repurchase rights,
agreements, arrangements, calls, commitments or rights of any
kind that obligate the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
issue or sell any shares of capital stock or other securities of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any securities or
obligations convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for,
or giving any Person a right to subscribe for or acquire, any
securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and no
securities or obligations evidencing such rights are authorized,
issued or |
A-7
|
|
|
outstanding. Upon any issuance of any Shares in accordance with
the terms of the Company Stock Plans, such Shares will be duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable and
free and clear of any Lien. The Company does not have
outstanding any bonds, debentures, notes or other obligations
the holders of which have the right to vote (or convertible into
or exercisable for securities having the right to vote) with the
shareholders of the Company on any matter. Section 5.1(b)
of the Company Disclosure Letter contains a true and complete
list of each Person in which the Company owns, directly or
indirectly, any voting interest that may require a filing by
Parent or any Affiliate (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)) of Parent
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of
1976, as amended (the HSR Act). |
|
|
(c) Corporate Authority; Approval and Fairness.
(i) The Company has all requisite corporate power and
authority and has taken all corporate action necessary in order
to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this
Agreement and to consummate the Merger, subject only to adoption
of this Agreement by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding Shares entitled to vote on such matter at a
shareholders meeting duly called and held for the purpose
(the Company Requisite Vote). This
Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of the Company
enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms,
subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer,
reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors rights
and to general equity principles (the Bankruptcy and
Equity Exception). |
|
|
(ii) The Board of Directors of the Company has
(A) declared that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby are advisable and has adopted this
Agreement; (B) received the opinions of its financial
advisors, Credit Suisse First Boston Inc. and Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated to the effect that the Per
Share Merger Consideration, together with the Special Dividend,
is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of Shares
(other than Excluded Shares); (C) resolved to recommend
adoption of this Agreement to the holders of Shares (such
recommendations being the Directors
Recommendation); and (D) directed that this
Agreement be submitted to the holders of Shares for their
adoption. |
|
|
(d) Governmental Filings; No Violations; Certain
Contracts. (i) Other than the notices, reports,
filings, consents, registrations, approvals, permits or
authorizations (A) pursuant to Section 1.3;
(B) required under the HSR Act, European Union Council
Regulation (EC) No. 139/2000 of January 20, 2004
(the EC Merger Regulation) (if applicable),
the Securities Act and the Exchange Act; (C) with or to the
Federal Communications Commission (the
FCC); (D) with or to those State
public service or public utility commissions or similar State
regulatory bodies (State Commissions)
set forth in Section 5.1(d)(i)(D) of the Company Disclosure
Letter; (E) with or to those foreign Governmental Entities
regulating competition and telecommunications businesses or the
use of radio spectrum or regulating or limiting investment set
forth in Section 5.1(d)(i)(E) of the Company Disclosure
Letter; and (F) with or to those State agencies or
departments or local governments that have issued competitive
access provider or other telecommunications franchises or any
other similar authorizations, no notices, reports or other
filings are required to be made by the Company with, nor are any
consents, registrations, approvals, permits or authorizations
required to be obtained by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries from, any domestic or foreign governmental or
regulatory authority, agency, commission, body, court or other
legislative, executive or judicial governmental entity (each a
Governmental Entity), in connection
with the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement
by the Company and the consummation by the Company of the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, or in connection
with the continuing operation of the business of the Company and
its Subsidiaries following the Effective Time, except those that
the failure to make or obtain would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement by the Company do not, and the consummation by the
Company of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby will not, constitute or result in (A) a breach or
violation of, or a default under, the certificate of
incorporation or by-laws of the Company or the comparable
governing documents of any of its Subsidiaries; (B) with or
without notice, lapse of time or both, a breach or violation of,
a termination (or right of termination) or |
A-8
|
|
|
default under, the creation or acceleration of any obligations
under or the creation of a Lien on any of the assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to any agreement,
lease, license, contract, note, mortgage, indenture or other
legally binding obligation (a
Contract) binding upon the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries or, assuming (solely with respect to
performance of this Agreement and consummation by the Company of
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby)
compliance with the matters referred to in
Section 5.1(d)(i), any Law or governmental or
non-governmental permit or license to which the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries is subject; or (C) any change in the
rights or obligations of any party under any Material Contract
(as defined in Section 5.1(j)(i)(I)) binding upon the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries (including, without
limitation, any change in pricing, put or call rights, rights of
first offer, rights of first refusal, tag-along or drag-along
rights or any similar rights or obligations which may be
exercised in connection with the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby), except, in the case of
clause (B) or (C) above, for any such breach,
violation, termination, default, creation, acceleration or
change that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
Section 5.1(d)(ii) of the Company Disclosure Letter sets
forth a correct and complete list of Material Contracts of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to which consents or
waivers are or may be required prior to consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(iii) As of the date of this Agreement, neither the Company
nor any of its Subsidiaries holds claims, as creditor or
claimant, of greater than $10,000,000 with respect to any one
debtor or debtor-in-possession subject to proceedings under
chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code. |
|
|
(e) Company Reports; Financial Statements.
(i) The Company has made available to Parent each
registration statement, report, proxy statement or information
statement prepared by it since December 31, 2003 (the
Audit Date) and filed with the SEC,
including the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 and the Companys
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods
ending March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2004,
each in the form (including exhibits, annexes and any amendments
thereto) filed with the SEC. The Company has filed or furnished
all forms, statements, reports and documents required to be
filed or furnished by it with the SEC pursuant to applicable
securities statutes, regulations, policies and rules since the
Audit Date (the forms, statements, reports and documents filed
or furnished with the SEC since the Audit Date and those filed
or furnished with the SEC subsequent to the date of this
Agreement, if any, including any amendments thereto, the
Company Reports). Each of the Company
Reports, at the time of its filing, complied or will comply in
all material respects with the applicable requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder and
complied in all material respects with the then applicable
accounting standards. As of their respective dates (or, if
amended, as of the date of such amendment), the Company Reports
did not, and any Company Reports filed with the SEC subsequent
to the date hereof will not, contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements made therein,
in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not
misleading. The Company Reports included or will include all
certificates required to be included therein pursuant to
Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
amended (the SOX Act), and the
internal control report and attestation of the Companys
outside auditors required by Section 404 of the SOX Act. |
|
|
(ii) Each of the consolidated balance sheets included in or
incorporated by reference into the Company Reports (including
the related notes and schedules) fairly presents, or, in the
case of Company Reports filed after the date hereof, will fairly
present, the consolidated financial position of the Company and
any other entity included therein and their respective
Subsidiaries as of its date, and each of the consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareowners equity and
cash flows included in or incorporated by reference into the
Company Reports (including any related notes and schedules)
fairly presents, or in the case of Company Reports filed after
the date hereof, will fairly present, the net income, total
shareowners equity and net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents, as the case may be, of the Company and any
other entity included therein and their respective Subsidiaries
for the periods set forth therein (subject, in the case of
unaudited statements, to notes and normal year-end audit |
A-9
|
|
|
adjustments that will not be material in amount or effect), in
each case in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP)
consistently applied during the periods involved, except as may
be noted therein. |
|
|
(iii) The management of the Company has
(x) implemented disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated Subsidiaries, is made known to the management of
the Company by others within those entities, and (y) has
disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation, to the
Companys outside auditors and the audit committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company (A) all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and (B) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal controls over financial reporting. Since
the Audit Date, any material change in internal control over
financial reporting required to be disclosed in any Company
Report has been so disclosed. |
|
|
(iv) Since the Audit Date, (x) neither the Company nor
any of its Subsidiaries nor, to the knowledge of the officers of
the Company, any director, officer, employee, auditor,
accountant or representative of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries has received or otherwise had or obtained knowledge
of any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim,
whether written or oral, regarding the accounting or auditing
practices, procedures, methodologies or methods of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective internal
accounting controls relating to periods after the Audit Date,
including any material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim
that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has engaged in
questionable accounting or auditing practices (except for any of
the foregoing after the date hereof which have no reasonable
basis), and (y) no attorney representing the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a material
violation of securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or
similar violation, relating to periods after the Audit Date, by
the Company or any of its officers, directors, employees or
agents to the Board of Directors of the Company or any committee
thereof or, to the knowledge of the officers of the Company, to
any director or officer of the Company. |
|
|
(f) Absence of Certain Changes. Since the Audit Date
the Company and its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective
businesses only in, and have not engaged in any material
transaction other than in accordance with, the ordinary course
of such businesses. Since the Audit Date, there has not been any
Material Adverse Effect or any event, occurrence, discovery or
development which would, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect.
Since the Audit Date and prior to the date hereof, there has not
been: |
|
|
|
(i) any recapitalization of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or any merger or consolidation of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries with any other Person (other than any
such transaction involving only wholly-owned Subsidiaries); |
|
|
(ii) any acquisition of any (A) business from any
other Person having a value in excess of $50,000,000 or
(B) assets from any other Person having a value in excess
of $50,000,000 other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice; |
|
|
(iii) any creation or incurrence of any material Liens on
any assets used in the businesses of the Company and its
Subsidiaries having an aggregate value in excess of $50,000,000; |
|
|
(iv) any making of any material loan, advance or capital
contribution to, or investment in, any Person other than
(A) loans, advances or capital contributions to, or
investments in, wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the Company and
(B) loans, advances or capital contributions to, or
investments in, any other Person in an amount not in excess of
$50,000,000 in the aggregate; |
|
|
(v) any declaration, setting aside or payment of any
dividend or distribution (whether in cash, stock, property or
any combination thereof) with respect to any shares of capital
stock of the |
A-10
|
|
|
Company or any of its Subsidiaries (except for the
Companys regular quarterly cash dividend and dividends or
distributions by any direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary
to the Company or any wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company,
and except for dividends or distributions by other Subsidiaries
of the Company for which the portion of such dividends or
distributions not payable to a direct or indirect wholly-owned
Subsidiary of the Company did not exceed $10,000,000 in value in
the aggregate for all such dividends and distributions, or any
repurchase, redemption or other acquisition by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, of any
outstanding shares of capital stock or other securities of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(vi) any incurrence of indebtedness for borrowed money or
issuance of any guarantee of indebtedness of another Person by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or issuance or sale of
any debt securities or warrants or other rights to acquire any
debt security of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, in each
case, other than refinancing on ordinary commercial terms and
other than involving an aggregate principal amount or guaranteed
amount not in excess of $50,000,000; |
|
|
(vii) any issuance of Shares or other equity securities of
the Company except pursuant to the Company Stock Plans and
except pursuant to the Companys dividend reinvestment
program; |
|
|
(viii) any material change with respect to accounting
policies or procedures by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, except for any such change required by changes in
GAAP or by applicable Law; |
|
|
(ix) (A) any increase in the compensation payable or
to become payable to its officers or employees (except for
increases in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice in salaries or wages of employees of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries who are not among the officers of the
Company for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act
(Section 16 Officers) or
(B) except for the AT&T Corp. 2004 Long Term Incentive
Program, any establishment, adoption, entry into or amendment of
any collective bargaining, bonus, profit sharing, thrift,
compensation, employment, termination, severance or other plan,
agreement, trust, fund, policy or arrangement for the benefit of
any director, officer or group of employees, except to the
extent required by applicable Laws; |
|
|
(x) any sale, lease, license or other disposition of any
assets of the Company or its Subsidiaries, except for
(A) obsolete assets and (B) sales, leases, licenses or
other dispositions of assets in the ordinary course of business
or for a purchase price not in excess of, or with a fair market
value not in excess of, $50,000,000 in any single transaction or
series of related transactions; or |
|
|
(xi) any agreement to do any of the foregoing. |
|
|
|
(g) Litigation and Liabilities. (i) There are
no (A) civil, criminal or administrative actions, suits,
claims, hearings, arbitrations, investigations or proceedings
pending or, to the knowledge of the officers of the Company,
threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or
Affiliates or (B) litigations, arbitrations, investigations
or other proceedings, or injunctions or final judgments relating
thereto, pending or, to the knowledge of the officers of the
Company, threatened against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries or Affiliates before any Governmental Entity,
including, without limitation, the FCC, except in the case of
either clause (A) or (B), for those that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. None of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates is a party to or subject to
the provisions of any judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree
or award of any Governmental Entity which would, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) There are no liabilities or obligations of the Company
or any Subsidiary of the Company, whether or not accrued,
contingent or otherwise and whether or not required to be
disclosed, or any other |
A-11
|
|
|
facts or circumstances that would reasonably be expected to
result in any obligations or liabilities of, the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries, other than: |
|
|
|
(A) liabilities or obligations to the extent
(I) reflected on the consolidated balance sheet of the
Company or (II) readily apparent in the notes thereto, in
each case included in the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004; |
|
|
(B) liabilities or obligations incurred in the ordinary
course of business since September 30, 2004; |
|
|
(C) performance obligations under contracts required in
accordance with their terms, or performance obligations, to the
extent required under applicable Law, in each case to the extent
arising after the date hereof; or |
|
|
(D) liabilities or obligations that would not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a
Material Adverse Effect. |
(h) Employee Benefits.
|
|
|
(i) All benefit and compensation plans, programs,
contracts, policies or arrangements covering current or former
employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries and current or
former directors of the Company, including, but not limited to,
the Company Stock Plans, employee benefit plans
within the meaning of Section 3(3) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), and deferred compensation,
pension, retirement, profit-sharing, thrift, savings, employee
stock ownership, stock bonus, stock purchase, restricted stock,
stock option, stock appreciation rights, performance share,
performance unit, incentive compensation, performance-based
compensation, stock-based compensation, bonus, employment,
retention, termination, severance, other compensation, medical,
health, fringe benefit or other plans, programs, contracts,
policies or arrangements (the Compensation and
Benefit Plans) other than those that did not
require the payment of in excess of $500,000 per annum for
the year ending December 31, 2004 individually or the
payment of in excess of $2,500,000 per annum for the year ending
December 31, 2004 in the aggregate (unless more than 500
employees are eligible to participate in the plan, program,
contract, policy or arrangement or the plan, program, contract,
policy or arrangement contains a change-in-control or similar
provision) are listed in Section 5.1(h)(i) of the Company
Disclosure Letter, except for Compensation and Benefit Plans
exclusively covering current or former employees of the Company
and its Subsidiaries and current or former directors of the
Company, in each case located in jurisdictions other than the
United States of America (a list of which shall be provided to
Parent within 30 days following the date of this Agreement)
and each Compensation and Benefit Plan that has received a
favorable opinion letter from the Internal Revenue National
Office, including any master or prototype plan, has been
separately identified. True and complete copies of all
Compensation and Benefit Plans listed in Section 5.1(h)(i)
of the Company Disclosure Letter, including any trust agreement
or other trust instrument, insurance contract forming a part of
such Compensation and Benefit Plans, and, with respect to any
employee stock ownership plan, any associated loan or credit
agreement, and all amendments thereto, have been made available
to Parent prior to the date hereof. |
|
|
(ii) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect,
all Compensation and Benefit Plans are in compliance with all
applicable Laws, including the Code and, to the extent
applicable, ERISA. Each Compensation and Benefit Plan that is an
employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of
Section 3(2) of ERISA (a Pension
Plan) and that is intended to be qualified under
Section 401(a) of the Code has received a favorable
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) covering all tax law changes
prior to the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act
of 2001, or has applied to the IRS for such favorable
determination letter within the applicable remedial amendment
period under Section 401(b) of the Code, and the Company is
not aware of any circumstances likely to result in the loss of
the qualification of such Pension Plan under Section 401(a)
of the Code. Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Effect, (A) there is no pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened litigation relating to the
Compensation and Benefit Plans, |
A-12
|
|
|
(B) any voluntary employees beneficiary association
within the meaning of Section 501(c)(9) of the Code which
provides benefits under a Compensation and Benefit Plan has
received an opinion letter from the IRS recognizing its exempt
status under Section 501(c)(9) of the Code, has timely
filed notice under Section 505(c) of the Code, and the
Company is not aware of circumstances likely to result in the
loss of such exempt status under Section 501(c)(9) of the
Code, (C) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
has incurred or reasonably expects to incur a tax or penalty
imposed by Section 4980F of the Code or Section 502 of
ERISA, and (D) neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has engaged in a transaction with respect to any
Compensation and Benefit Plan that, assuming the taxable period
of such transaction expired as of the date hereof, would subject
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to a tax or penalty
imposed by either Section 4975 of the Code or
Section 502 of ERISA. |
|
|
(iii) No liability under Subtitle C or D of Title IV
of ERISA has been or is expected to be incurred by the Company
or any Subsidiary with respect to any ongoing, frozen or
terminated single-employer plan, within the meaning
of Section 4001(a)(15) of ERISA, currently or formerly
maintained by any of them, or the single-employer plan of any
entity which is considered one employer with the Company under
Section 4001 of ERISA or Section 414 of the Code (an
ERISA Affiliate). The Company and its
Subsidiaries have not contributed, or been obligated to
contribute, to a multiemployer plan under Subtitle E of
Title IV of ERISA at any time within the past six years,
and no notice of a reportable event, within the
meaning of Section 4043 of ERISA, for which the 30-day
reporting requirement has not been waived, has been required to
be filed for any Pension Plan or by any ERISA Affiliate within
the 12-month period ending on the date hereof or will be
required to be filed in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(iv) All contributions required to be made under the terms
of any Compensation and Benefit Plan as of the date hereof have
been timely made and all obligations in respect of each
Compensation and Benefit Plan have been properly accrued and
reflected on the most recent consolidated balance sheet filed or
incorporated by reference in the Company Reports to the extent
required by GAAP. As of the date of this Agreement, neither any
Pension Plan nor any single-employer plan of an ERISA Affiliate
has an accumulated funding deficiency (whether or
not waived) within the meaning of Section 412 of the Code
or Section 302 of ERISA. Neither the Company nor its
Subsidiaries has provided, or is required to provide, security
to any Pension Plan or to any single-employer plan of an ERISA
Affiliate pursuant to Section 401(a)(29) of the Code. |
|
|
(v) Under each Pension Plan which is a single-employer
plan, as of the last day of the most recent plan year ended
prior to the date of this Agreement, the actuarially determined
present value of all benefit liabilities, within the
meaning of Section 4001(a)(16) of ERISA (as determined on
the basis of the actuarial assumptions contained in the Pension
Plans most recent actuarial valuation), did not exceed the
then current value of the assets of such Pension Plan, and there
has been no material adverse change in the financial condition
of such Pension Plan since the last day of the most recent plan
year. |
|
|
(vi) Except as set forth in Section 5.1(h)(vi) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, neither the Company nor any of its
Subsidiaries has any obligations for retiree health or life
benefits under any Compensation and Benefit Plan other than as
required by applicable law or the continuation of health or life
benefits after a severance event pursuant to any severance plan,
program, arrangement or agreement. |
|
|
(vii) The consummation of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not
(w) entitle any employees of the Company or its
Subsidiaries to severance pay or any increase in severance pay
upon any termination of employment after the date hereof;
(x) accelerate the time of payment or vesting or result in
any payment or funding (through a grantor trust or otherwise) or
trigger any payment of compensation or benefits under, increase
the amount payable or trigger any other material obligation
pursuant to, any of the Compensation and Benefit Plans;
(y) limit or restrict the right of the Company or, after
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, Parent to
merge, amend or terminate any of the Compensation and Benefit
Plans; or (z) result in any breach or violation of, or
default under, any of the Compensation and Benefit Plans. |
A-13
|
|
|
(viii) Except as would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Effect, (A) all Compensation and Benefit Plans
covering current or former non-U.S. employees of the
Company and its Subsidiaries comply with applicable local Laws
and (B) the Company and its Subsidiaries have no unfunded
liabilities with respect to any Pension Plan that covers such
non-U.S. employees and that are not set forth in the
Financial Statements. |
|
|
(i) Compliance with Laws; Licenses. (i) The
businesses of each of the Company and its Subsidiaries have not
been conducted in violation of any federal, state, local or
foreign law, statute or ordinance, common law, or any rule,
regulation, standard, judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree,
arbitration award, agency requirement, license or permit of any
Governmental Entity (collectively,
Laws), except for such violations that
would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. No
investigation or review by any Governmental Entity with respect
to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is pending or, to the
knowledge of the officers of the Company, threatened, nor has
any Governmental Entity indicated an intention to conduct the
same, except for any such investigations or reviews that would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries has obtained and is in substantial compliance with
all permits, licenses, certifications, approvals, registrations,
consents, authorizations, franchises, variances, exemptions and
orders issued or granted by a Governmental Entity
(Licenses) necessary to conduct its
business as presently conducted, except for any failures to have
or to be in compliance with such Licenses which would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is in
compliance in all material respects with each FCC License and
State License (each as defined in Section 6.1(ii) and,
collectively, the Communications
Licenses). Each of the Company and its
Subsidiaries is in compliance with (A) its obligations
under each of the Company Licenses (as defined in
Section 6.1(ii)) and (B) the rules and regulations of
the Governmental Entity issuing such Company Licenses, except
for any failures to be in compliance which would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. There is not pending or, to
the knowledge of the officers of the Company, threatened before
the FCC, the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) or any other Governmental Entity
any material proceeding, notice of violation, order of
forfeiture or complaint or investigation against the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries relating to any of the Company Licenses,
except, in the case of Company Licenses other than
Communications Licenses, for any of the foregoing that would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. The actions of the
applicable Governmental Entities granting all Company Licenses
have not been reversed, stayed, enjoined, annulled or suspended,
and there is not pending or, to the knowledge of the officers of
the Company, threatened, any material application, petition,
objection or other pleading with the FCC, the FAA or any other
Governmental Entity which challenges or questions the validity
of or any rights of the holder under any Company License,
except, in the case of Company Licenses other than
Communications Licenses, for any of the foregoing that would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iii) All of the microwave paths of the Company and its
Subsidiaries in respect of which a filing with the FCC or the
FAA was required have been constructed and are currently
operated in all respects as represented to the FCC or the FAA in
currently effective filings, and modifications to such microwave
paths have been preceded by the submission to the FCC or the FAA
of all required filings, in each case, except as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iv) Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a non-de minimis
adverse effect on the operation of transmission towers by
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (A) all
transmission towers located on property owned or leased by the
Company and its Subsidiaries are obstruction-marked and lighted
to the extent required by, and in accordance with, the rules and
regulations of the FAA (the FAA
Rules), and (B) appropriate notification to
the FAA has been made for each transmission tower located on
property owned or leased by the Company and its Subsidiaries. |
A-14
|
|
|
(j) Material Contracts. (i) Except as set forth
in Schedule 5.1(j)(i) of the Company Disclosure Letter, as
of the date of this Agreement, neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by: |
|
|
|
(A) any lease of real or personal property providing for
annual rentals of $15,000,000 or more; |
|
|
(B) any agreement or agreements involving more than
$5,000,000 individually or $10,000,000 in the aggregate to
acquire (I) a License, or an interest in an entity holding
a License, that upon acquisition by the Company would become a
Communications License or (II) any interest in an entity
that holds a License that upon acquisition of such entity by the
Company would become a Foreign License; |
|
|
(C) any partnership, joint venture or other similar
agreement or arrangement relating to the formation, creation,
operation, management or control of any partnership or joint
venture material to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or in
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries owns any interest
valued at more than $10,000,000 without regard to percentage
voting or economic interest (unless pursuant to such agreement
or arrangement the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have a
future funding obligation reasonably likely to require funding
of more than $15,000,000 in the aggregate); |
|
|
(D) any Contract (other than among direct or indirect
wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the Company) relating to
indebtedness for borrowed money or the deferred purchase price
of property (in either case, whether incurred, assumed,
guaranteed or secured by any asset) in excess of $50,000,000; |
|
|
(E) any Contract required to be filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K under the Securities
Act; |
|
|
(F) any non-competition Contract or other Contract that
(I) purports to limit in any material respect either the
type of business in which the Company or its Subsidiaries (or,
after the Effective Time, Parent or its Affiliates) may engage
or the manner or locations in which any of them may so engage in
any business or (II) could require the disposition of any
material assets or line of business of the Company or its
Subsidiaries or, after the Effective Time, Parent or its
Affiliates; |
|
|
(G) any Contract (other than (I) a Contract with
respect to compensation or similar arrangements not involving a
director of the Company or one of the Section 16 Officers
and (II) any Contract entered into in the ordinary course
of business) between the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and
any director or officer of the Company or any Person
beneficially owning, as of the date hereof, five percent or more
of the outstanding Shares; |
|
|
(H) any Contract that contains a put, call or similar right
pursuant to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries could
be required to purchase or sell, as applicable, any equity
interests of any Person or assets that have a fair market value
or purchase price of more than $25,000,000; and |
|
|
(I) any other Contract or group of Contracts with a single
counterparty that, if terminated or subject to a default by any
party thereto, would, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect
(the Contracts described in clauses (A) (I),
together with all exhibits and schedules to such Contracts,
being the Material Contracts). |
|
|
|
(ii) A true and complete copy of each Material Contract has
previously been delivered or made available to Parent (subject
to applicable confidentiality restrictions) and each such
Contract is a valid and binding agreement of the Company or one
of its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, and is in full force
and effect, and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries
nor, to the knowledge of the officers of the Company, any other
party thereto is in material default or breach under the terms
of any such Material Contract. |
|
|
(k) Real Property. (i) Except in any such case
as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect, with respect to
the real property owned by |
A-15
|
|
|
the Company or its Subsidiaries (the Owned Real
Property), (A) the Company or one of its
Subsidiaries, as applicable, has good and marketable title to
the Owned Real Property, free and clear of any Encumbrance, and
(B) there are no outstanding options or rights of first
refusal to purchase the Owned Real Property, or any portion
thereof or interest therein. |
|
|
(ii) With respect to the real property leased or subleased
to the Company or its Subsidiaries (the Leased Real
Property), (A) the lease or sublease for such
property is valid, legally binding, enforceable and in full
force and effect, and none of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is in breach of or default under such lease or
sublease, and no event has occurred which, with notice, lapse of
time or both, would constitute a breach or default by any of the
Company or its Subsidiaries or permit termination, modification
or acceleration by any third party thereunder, and (B) no
third party has repudiated or has the right to terminate or
repudiate such lease or sublease (except for the normal exercise
of remedies in connection with a default thereunder or any
termination rights set forth in the lease or sublease) or any
provision thereof, except in each case, for such invalidity,
failures to be binding, unenforceability, ineffectiveness,
breaches, defaults, terminations, modifications, accelerations,
repudiations and rights to terminate or repudiate that would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(iii) For purposes of this Section 5.1(k) only,
Encumbrance means any mortgage, lien,
pledge, charge, security interest, easement, covenant, or other
restriction or title matter or encumbrance of any kind in
respect of such asset except for (A) specified encumbrances
described in Section 5.1(k)(iii) of the Company Disclosure
Letter; (B) encumbrances for current Taxes or other
governmental charges not yet due and payable;
(C) mechanics, carriers, workmens,
repairmens or other like encumbrances arising or incurred
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
relating to obligations as to which there is no default on the
part of Company, or the validity or amount of which is being
contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings; and
(D) other encumbrances that do not, individually or in the
aggregate, materially impair the continued use, operation, value
or marketability of the specific parcel of Owned Real Property
or Leased Real Property to which they relate or the conduct of
the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries as presently
conducted. |
|
|
(l) Right-of-Way Agreements. (i) Except in any
such case as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect,
(A) each right-of-way agreement, license agreement or other
agreement permitting or requiring the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to lay, build, operate, maintain or place cable,
wires, conduits or other equipment and facilities over land or
underground (each, a Right-of-Way
Agreement) is valid, legally binding, enforceable
and in full force and effect, and none of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries is in breach of or default under any
Right-of-Way Agreement, (B) no event has occurred which,
with notice or lapse of time, would constitute a breach or
default by any of the Company or its Subsidiaries or permit
termination, modification or acceleration by any third party
thereunder and (C) no third party has repudiated or has the
right to terminate or repudiate any Right-of-Way Agreement. |
|
|
(ii) To the knowledge of the officers of the Company, the
Company is not in violation of any Laws which, individually or
in combination with any others, would materially and adversely
affect the ability of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to
use any of the rights associated with the Right-of-Way
Agreements, taken as a whole, in the manner and scope in which
such rights are now being used. |
|
|
(m) Takeover Statutes. No fair price,
moratorium, control share acquisition or
other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation (each a
Takeover Statute) is applicable to the
Company, the Shares, the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The Board of Directors of the
Company has taken all action so that Parent will not be
prohibited from entering into a business combination
with the Company or any of its Affiliates as an interested
shareholder (in each case as such term is used in
Section 912 of the NYBCL) as a result of the execution of
this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby. |
|
|
(n) Environmental Matters. Except for such matters
as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect: (i) the
Company and its |
A-16
|
|
|
Subsidiaries have complied at all times with all applicable
Environmental Laws (as defined below); (ii) no property
currently owned, leased or operated by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries (including soils, groundwater, surface water,
buildings or other structures) is contaminated with any
Hazardous Substance (as defined below) in a manner that is or
could be required to be Remediated or Removed (as such terms are
defined below), that is in violation of any Environmental Law,
or that is reasonably likely to give rise to any Environmental
Liability; (iii) the Company and its Subsidiaries have no
information that any property formerly owned, leased or operated
by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries was contaminated with
any Hazardous Substance during or prior to such period of
ownership, leasehold, or operation; (iv) neither the
Company nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any prior owner or
operator has incurred in the past or is now subject to any
Environmental Liabilities (as defined below); (v) neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any notice,
demand, letter, claim or request for information alleging that
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may be in violation of or
subject to liability under any Environmental Law;
(vi) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is
subject to any order, decree, injunction or agreement with any
Governmental Entity, or any indemnity or other agreement with
any third party, concerning liability or obligations relating to
any Environmental Law or otherwise relating to any Hazardous
Substance or any environmental, health or safety matter; and
(vii) there are no other circumstances or conditions
involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that could
reasonably be expected to result in any Environmental Liability. |
|
|
As used herein, the term Environmental
Laws means all Laws (including any common law)
relating to: (A) the protection, investigation or
restoration of the environment, health, safety, or natural
resources, (B) the handling, use, presence, disposal,
Release or threatened release of any Hazardous Substance or
(C) noise, odor, indoor air, employee exposure,
electromagnetic fields, wetlands, pollution, contamination or
any injury or threat of injury to persons or property relating
to any Hazardous Substance. |
|
|
As used herein, the term Environmental
Liability means (i) any obligations or
liabilities (including any notices, claims, complaints, suits or
other assertions of obligations or liabilities) that are:
(A) related to environment, health or safety issues
(including on-site or off-site contamination by Hazardous
Substances of surface or subsurface soil or water, and
occupational safety and health); and (B) based upon
(I) any provision of Environmental Laws or (II) any
order, consent, decree, writ, injunction or judgment issued or
otherwise imposed by any Governmental Entity. The term
Environmental Liabilities includes, without
limitation: (A) fines, penalties, judgments, awards,
settlements, losses, damages (including consequential damages),
costs, fees (including attorneys and consultants
fees), expenses and disbursements relating to environmental,
health or safety matters; (B) defense and other responses
to any administrative or judicial action (including notices,
claims, complaints, suits and other assertions of liability)
relating to environmental, health or safety matters; and
(C) financial responsibility for (x) cleanup costs and
injunctive relief, including any Removal, Remedial or Response
actions, and natural resource damages, and (y) other
Environmental Laws compliance or remedial measures. |
|
|
As used herein, the term Hazardous
Substance means any hazardous
substance and any pollutant or contaminant as
those terms are defined in the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended
(CERCLA); any hazardous
waste as that term is defined in the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA); and any
hazardous material as that term is defined in the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (49 U.S.C.
§ 1801 et seq.), as amended (including
as those terms are further defined, construed, or otherwise used
in rules, regulations, standards, orders, guidelines,
directives, and publications issued pursuant to, or otherwise in
implementation of, said Laws); and including, without
limitation, any petroleum product or byproduct, solvent,
flammable or explosive material, radioactive material, asbestos,
lead paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (or PCBs), dioxins,
dibenzofurans, heavy metals, radon gas, mold, mold spores, and
mycotoxins. |
|
|
As used herein, the term Release means
any spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying,
discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, dumping, placing,
discarding, abandonment, or |
A-17
|
|
|
disposing into the environment (including the placing,
discarding or abandonment of any barrel, container or other
receptacle containing any Hazardous Substance or other material). |
|
|
As used herein, the term Removal, Remedial or
Response actions include the types of activities
covered by CERCLA, RCRA, and other comparable Environmental
Laws, and whether such activities are those which might be taken
by a Governmental Entity or those which a Governmental Entity or
any other person might seek to require of waste generators,
handlers, distributors, processors, users, storers, treaters,
owners, operators, transporters, recyclers, reusers, disposers,
or other persons under removal,
remedial, or other response actions. |
|
|
(o) Taxes. Except as would not, individually or in
the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material
Adverse Effect: the Company and each of its Subsidiaries
(i) have prepared in good faith and duly and timely filed
(taking into account any extension of time within which to file)
all Tax Returns (as defined below) required to be filed by any
of them and all such filed Tax Returns are complete and accurate
in all material respects; and (ii) have paid all Taxes (as
defined below) that are required to be paid or that the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries are obligated to withhold from
amounts owing to any employee, creditor or third party, except
with respect to matters contested in good faith or for which
adequate reserves have been established. As of the date hereof,
except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in an increase in Taxes that is
material to the Company, there are no audits, examinations,
investigations or other proceedings, in each case, pending or
threatened in writing, in respect of Taxes or Tax matters. The
Company has made available to Parent true and correct copies of
the United States federal income Tax Returns filed by the
Company and its Subsidiaries for each of the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000. None of the Company
or its Subsidiaries has been a distributing
corporation or controlled corporation in any
distribution occurring during the last 30 months that was
purported or intended to be governed by Section 355 of the
Code (or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law). |
|
|
As used in this Agreement, (i) the term
Tax (including, with correlative
meaning, the term Taxes) includes all
federal, state, local and foreign income, profits, franchise,
gross receipts, environmental, customs duty, capital stock,
severances, stamp, payroll, sales, employment, unemployment,
disability, use, property, withholding, excise, production,
value added, occupancy and other taxes, duties or assessments of
any nature whatsoever, together with all interest, penalties and
additions imposed with respect to such amounts and any interest
in respect of such penalties and additions, and (ii) the
term Tax Return includes all returns
and reports (including elections, declarations, disclosures,
schedules, estimates and information returns) required to be
supplied to a Tax authority relating to Taxes. |
|
|
(p) Labor Matters. Neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to or otherwise bound by any
collective bargaining agreement or other Contract with a labor
union or labor organization, nor (except for proceedings
involving individual employees arising in the ordinary course of
business) is the Company or any of its Subsidiaries the subject
of any material proceeding asserting that the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries has committed an unfair labor practice or
seeking to compel it to bargain with any labor union or labor
organization. There is not pending or, to the knowledge of the
officers of the Company, threatened, nor has there been for the
past five years, any labor strike, dispute, walk-out, work
stoppage, slow-down or lockout involving more than 100 employees
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. To the knowledge of
the officers of the Company, there are no organizational efforts
with respect to the formation of a collective bargaining unit
presently being made or threatened involving more than 100
employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(q) Intellectual Property and IT Assets. Except for
such matters as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect: |
|
|
|
(i) All patents, patent applications, trademark and
copyright registrations and applications for registration, and
Internet domain name registrations claimed to be owned by the
Company are owned exclusively by the Company and are valid,
subsisting and, to the knowledge of the officers of the Company,
enforceable. |
A-18
|
|
|
(ii) The Company and/or each of its Subsidiaries owns, or
is licensed or otherwise possesses legally enforceable rights to
use, all Intellectual Property necessary to conduct the business
of the Company and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted, all
of which rights shall survive unchanged the execution and
delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereunder. |
|
|
(iii) The conduct of the business as currently conducted by
the Company and its Subsidiaries and for the three (3) year
period immediately preceding the date of this Agreement does not
and did not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the
Intellectual Property rights of any third Person. There is no
claim, action or proceeding asserted, or to the knowledge of the
officers of the Company threatened, against the Company or its
Subsidiaries or any indemnities thereof concerning the
ownership, validity, registerability, enforceability,
infringement, use or licensed right to use any Intellectual
Property claimed to be owned or held by the Company or its
Subsidiaries or used or alleged to be used in the business of
the Company or its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(iv) To the knowledge of the officers of the Company, no
third Person has for the three (3) year period immediately
preceding the date of this Agreement infringed, misappropriated
or otherwise violated the Intellectual Property rights of the
Company or its Subsidiaries. There are no claims, actions or
proceedings asserted or threatened by the Company, or decided by
the Company to be asserted or threatened, that (A) a third
Person infringes, misappropriates or otherwise violates, or for
the three (3) year period immediately preceding the date of
this Agreement infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated,
the Intellectual Property rights of the Company or its
Subsidiaries; or (B) a third Persons owned or claimed
Intellectual Property interferes with, infringes, dilutes or
otherwise harms the Intellectual Property rights of the Company
or its Subsidiaries. |
|
|
(v) The Company and its Subsidiaries have taken reasonable
measures to protect the confidentiality of all material Trade
Secrets that are owned, used or held by the Company and its
Subsidiaries and, to the knowledge of the officers of the
Company, such material Trade Secrets have not been used,
disclosed to or discovered by any Person except pursuant to
valid and appropriate non-disclosure and/or license agreements
which have not been breached. |
|
|
(vi) The IT Assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries
operate and perform in all material respects in accordance with
their documentation and functional specifications and otherwise
as required by the Company and its Subsidiaries for the
operation of their respective businesses, and have not
malfunctioned or failed within the three (3) year period
immediately preceding the date of this Agreement. To the
knowledge of the officers of the Company, no Person has gained
unauthorized access to such IT Assets. The Company and its
Subsidiaries have implemented and maintained for the three
(3) year period immediately preceding the date of this
Agreement reasonable and sufficient backup and disaster recovery
technology consistent with industry practices. |
|
|
As used herein, |
|
|
(1) Computer Software means all
computer software and databases (including, without limitation,
source code, object code, and all related documentation). |
|
|
(2) Intellectual Property means,
collectively, all United States and foreign (i) trademarks,
service marks, brand names, certification marks, collective
marks, d/b/as, Internet domain names, logos, symbols,
trade dress, assumed names, fictitious names, trade names, and
other indicia of origin, all applications and registrations for
the foregoing, and all goodwill associated therewith and
symbolized thereby, including all renewals of same
(collectively, Trademarks);
(ii) inventions and discoveries, whether patentable or not,
and all patents, registrations, invention disclosures and
applications therefor, including divisions, continuations,
continuations-in-part and renewal applications, and including
renewals, extensions and reissues (collectively,
Patents); (iii) trade secrets and
confidential information and know-how, including processes,
schematics, business methods, formulae, drawings, prototypes,
models, designs, customer lists and supplier lists (collectively, |
A-19
|
|
|
Trade Secrets); (iv) published
and unpublished works of authorship, whether copyrightable or
not (including without limitation Computer Software and other
compilations of information), copyrights therein and thereto,
and registrations and applications therefor, and all renewals,
extensions, restorations and reversions thereof (collectively,
Copyrights); (v) moral rights,
rights of publicity and rights of privacy; and (vi) all
other intellectual property or proprietary rights. |
|
|
(3) IT Assets means computers,
Computer Software, firmware, middleware, servers, workstations,
routers, hubs, switches, data communications lines, and all
other information technology equipment and elements, and all
associated documentation. |
|
|
|
(r) GSA Action. The Company is not subject to any
debarment or suspension and has not received any notice that
would reasonably be expected to result in a debarment or
suspension (any of the foregoing, a GSA
Action) from the United States General Services
Administration with respect to the provision of services by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any United States Federal
Governmental Entity. |
|
|
(s) Export Controls and Trade Sanctions. Except for
such matters as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to impair materially the Companys
and its Subsidiaries ability to engage in material export
operations: |
|
|
|
(i) The Company and its Affiliates have complied with all
statutory and regulatory requirements relating to export
controls and trade sanctions under the Laws of the United
States, as well as applicable Laws of each jurisdiction in which
the Company or its Affiliates are doing business, including,
without limitation, the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations, antiboycott
provisions, regulations administered by the Office of Foreign
Assets Control, and provisions under the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. |
|
|
(ii) The Company and its Affiliates have developed and
implemented an export control and trade sanctions compliance
program which includes corporate policies and procedures to
ensure compliance with applicable government export control and
trade sanctions statutes, regulations, and other obligations,
including obtaining licenses or other authorizations as required
for access by foreign nationals in the U.S. to controlled
technology. |
|
|
(iii) In connection with its export control and trade
sanctions matters, there are no adverse or negative past
performance evaluations or ratings by the U.S. Government,
or any voluntary disclosures under the export control and trade
sanctions Laws, any enforcement actions or threats of
enforcement actions, or, to the knowledge of the officers of the
Company, any facts that could result in any adverse or negative
performance evaluation that, in each case, could affect the
evaluation of the Companys or its Affiliates (or
their successors) obtaining approval for future export
activity. |
|
|
(iv) Neither the U.S. Government nor any other Person
has notified the Company or any of its Affiliates in writing of
any actual or alleged violation or breach of any statute,
regulation, representation, certification, disclosure
obligation, licensing obligation or other authorization or
provision relating to export controls or trade sanctions. |
|
|
(v) None of the Company or its Affiliates has undergone or
is undergoing any audit, review, inspection, investigation,
survey or examination of records relating to the Companys
or any of its Affiliates export activity that would,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
affect adversely its future export activity, and, to the
knowledge of the officers of the Company, there is no basis for
any such audit, review, inspection, investigation, survey or
examination of records. |
|
|
(vi) The Company and its Affiliates have not been and are
not now under any administrative, civil or criminal
investigation or indictment involving alleged false statements,
false claims or other improprieties relating to the
Companys or any of its Affiliates export activity,
nor, to the knowledge of the officers of the Company, is there
any basis for any such investigation or indictment. |
|
|
(vii) The Company and its Affiliates have not been and are
not now a party to any administrative or civil litigation
involving alleged false statements, false claims or other
improprieties |
A-20
|
|
|
relating to the Companys or any of its Affiliates
export activity, nor, to the knowledge of the officers of the
Company, is there any basis for any such proceeding. |
|
|
|
(t) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Except for such
matters as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse impact on
the ability of the Company and its Subsidiaries to conduct their
operations in the ordinary course of business: |
|
|
|
(i) The Company and its Affiliates have developed and
implemented a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance program
which includes corporate policies and procedures to ensure
compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. |
|
|
(ii) In connection with its compliance with the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, there are no adverse or negative past
performance evaluations or ratings by the U.S. Government,
or any voluntary disclosures under the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act, any enforcement actions or threats of enforcement actions,
or any facts that, in each case, could result in any adverse or
negative performance evaluation related to the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. |
|
|
(iii) Neither the U.S. Government nor any other Person
has notified the Company or any of its Affiliates in writing of
any actual or alleged violation or breach of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act. |
|
|
(iv) None of the Company or its Affiliates has undergone
and is undergoing any audit, review, inspection, investigation,
survey or examination of records relating to the Companys
or any of its Affiliates compliance with the Foreign
Corrupt Practice Act, and, to the knowledge of the officers of
the Company, there is no basis for any such audit, review,
inspection, investigation, survey or examination of records. |
|
|
(v) The Company and its Affiliates have not been and are
not now under any administrative, civil or criminal
investigation, charge or indictment involving alleged false
statements, false claims or other improprieties relating to the
Companys or any of its Affiliates compliance with
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, nor, to the knowledge of the
officers of the Company, is there any basis for any such
investigation or indictment. |
|
|
(vi) None of the Company or its Affiliates has been and is
not now a party to any administrative or civil litigation
involving alleged false statements, false claims or other
improprieties relating to the Companys or any of its
Affiliates compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act, nor, to the knowledge of the officers of the Company, is
there any basis for any such proceeding. |
|
|
|
(u) Brokers and Finders. Neither the Company nor any
of its officers, directors or employees has employed any broker
or finder or incurred any liability for any brokerage fees,
commissions or finders, fees in connection with the Merger or
the other transactions contemplated in this Agreement, except
that the Company has employed Credit Suisse First Boston Inc.
and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated as its financial
advisors, and copies of the engagement letters with such
financial advisors have been provided to Parent prior to the
date hereof. |
5.2. Representations and
Warranties of Parent and Merger Sub. Except as set forth
in the disclosure letter (subject to Section 9.12(c) of
this Agreement) delivered to the Company by Parent prior to
entering into this Agreement (the Parent Disclosure
Letter) or, to the extent the qualifying nature of
such disclosure with respect to a specific representation and
warranty is readily apparent therefrom, as set forth in the
Parent Reports (as defined in Section 5.2(f)) filed on or
after January 1, 2004 and prior to the date hereof
(excluding any disclosures included in any such Parent Report
that are predictive or forward-looking in nature), Parent and
Merger Sub each hereby represent and warrant to the Company that:
|
|
|
(a) Organization, Good Standing and Qualification.
Each of Parent and Merger Sub is a legal entity duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of its
respective jurisdiction of organization and has all requisite
corporate or similar power and authority to own and operate its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as presently
conducted and is qualified to do business and is in good
standing as a foreign corporation in each jurisdiction where the
ownership or operation of its assets or properties or conduct of
its business requires such qualification, except where the
failure to be |
A-21
|
|
|
so organized, validly existing, qualified or in good standing,
or to have such power or authority, would not, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected (x) to result in a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, assets,
liabilities, business or results of operations of Parent and its
Subsidiaries (with respect to Cingular LLC and its Subsidiaries,
including only Parents interest therein) taken as a whole,
excluding any such effect resulting from (I) changes in
political or regulatory conditions generally, (II) changes
or conditions generally affecting the U.S. economy or
financial markets or generally affecting any of the segments of
the telecommunications industry in which Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries operates or (III) the announcement or
consummation of this Agreement, or (y) to prevent,
materially delay or materially impair the ability of Parent and
Merger Sub to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (a Parent Material
Adverse Effect). Parent has made available to the
Company a complete and correct copy of the certificate of
incorporation and by-laws of Parent and Merger Sub, each as in
effect on the date of this Agreement. |
|
|
(b) Capital Structure of Parent. The authorized
capital stock of Parent consists of 7,000,000,000 shares of
Parent Common Stock, of which 3,302,815,078 shares were
outstanding as of the close of business on January 28,
2005, and 10,000,000 preferred shares, par value $1.00 per
share (the Parent Preferred Shares),
of which no shares were authorized for issuance or outstanding
as of the close of business on January 28, 2005. All of the
outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock have been duly
authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and
nonassessable. Parent has no shares of Parent Common Stock or
Parent Preferred Shares reserved for issuance. As of
January 28, 2005, Parent has no more than
330,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock authorized for
issuance pursuant to employee or director benefit plans (the
Parent Stock Plans). Except as set
forth above, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no
preemptive or other outstanding rights, options, warrants,
conversion rights, stock appreciation rights, redemption rights,
repurchase rights, agreements, arrangements, calls, commitments
or rights of any kind that obligate Parent to issue or sell any
shares of capital stock or other securities of Parent or any
securities or obligations convertible or exchangeable into or
exercisable for, or giving any Person a right to subscribe for
or acquire, any securities of Parent, and no securities or
obligations evidencing such rights are authorized, issued or
outstanding. Parent does not have outstanding any bonds,
debentures, notes or other obligations the holders of which have
the right to vote (or convertible into or exercisable for
securities having the right to vote) with the stockholders of
Parent on any matter. All shares of Parent Common Stock to be
issued in the Merger will be, when issued in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement, duly authorized and validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable and free and clear of all Liens. |
|
|
(c) Capitalization of Merger Sub. The authorized
capital stock of Merger Sub consists solely of 1,000 shares
of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, all of which
are validly issued and outstanding. All of the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Merger Sub is, and at the Effective
Time will be, owned by Parent or a direct or indirect
wholly-owned Subsidiary of Parent. Merger Sub has not conducted
any business prior to the date hereof and has no, and prior to
the Effective Time will have no, assets, liabilities or
obligations of any nature other than those incident to its
formation and pursuant to this Agreement and the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(d) Corporate Authority; Approval and Fairness.
(i) No vote of holders of capital stock of Parent is
necessary to approve this Agreement and the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby. Each of Parent and Merger Sub
has all requisite corporate power and authority and has taken
all corporate action necessary in order to execute, deliver and
perform its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate
the Merger. This Agreement is a valid and binding agreement of
Parent and Merger Sub, enforceable against each of Parent and
Merger Sub in accordance with its terms, subject to the
Bankruptcy and Equity Exception. |
|
|
(ii) (A) The Board of Directors of each of Parent and
Merger Sub has declared that the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby are advisable, the Board of
Directors of Parent has approved this Agreement and the Board of
Directors of Merger Sub has adopted this Agreement; and
(B) Parent has received the opinion of its financial
advisors, Lehman Brothers Inc. and Evercore Partners |
A-22
|
|
|
Inc., to the effect that the Per Share Merger Consideration,
together with the Special Dividend, is fair from a financial
point of view to Parent. |
|
|
(e) Governmental Filings; No Violations; Etc.
(i) Other than the reports, filings, registrations,
consents, approvals, permits, authorizations and/or notices
(A) pursuant to Section 1.3; (B) under the HSR
Act, EC Merger Regulation (if applicable), the Securities Act
and the Exchange Act; (C) with or to the FCC; (D) with
or to the State Commissions set forth in
Section 5.2(e)(i)(D) of the Parent Disclosure Letter; and
(E) with or to those foreign Governmental Entities
regulating competition and telecommunications businesses set
forth in Section 5.2(e)(i)(E) of the Parent Disclosure
Letter, no notices, reports or other filings are required to be
made by Parent with, nor are any consents, registrations,
approvals, permits or authorizations required to be obtained by
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries from, any Governmental Entity
in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement by Parent and the consummation by Parent and
Merger Sub of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby, except those that the failure to make or obtain would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) The execution, delivery and performance of this
Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub do not, and the consummation
by Parent and Merger Sub of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby will not, constitute or result
in (A) a breach or violation of, or a default under, the
certificate of incorporation or by-laws of Parent or Merger Sub;
(B) with or without notice, lapse of time or both, a breach
or violation of, a termination (or right of termination) or a
default under, the creation or acceleration of any obligations
under or the creation of a Lien on any of the assets of Parent
or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to any material Contract
binding upon Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or, assuming
(solely with respect to performance of this Agreement and
consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby) compliance with the
matters referred to in Section 5.2(e)(i), any Law or
governmental or non-governmental permit or license to which
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is subject; or (C) any
change in the rights or obligations of any party under any of
such material Contracts, except, in the case of
clause (B) or (C) above, for any breach,
violation, termination, default, creation, acceleration or
change that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to prevent the ability of Parent or
Merger Sub to consummate the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. |
|
|
(f) Parent Reports; Financial Statements.
(i) Parent has made available to the Company each
registration statement, report, proxy statement or information
statement prepared by it since December 31, 2003 (the
Parent Audit Date) and filed with the
SEC, including Parents Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 and Parents
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
periods ending March 31, June 30 and
September 30, 2004, each in the form (including exhibits,
annexes and any amendments thereto) filed with the SEC. Parent
has filed or furnished all forms, statements, reports and
documents required to be filed or furnished by it with the SEC
pursuant to applicable securities statutes, regulations,
policies and rules since the Parent Audit Date (the forms,
statements, reports and documents filed or furnished with the
SEC since the Parent Audit Date and those filed or furnished
with the SEC subsequent to the date of this Agreement, if any,
including any amendments thereto, the Parent
Reports). Each of the Parent Reports, at the time
of its filing, complied or will comply in all material respects
with the applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder and complied in all material
respects with the then applicable accounting standards. As of
their respective dates (or, if amended, as of the date of such
amendment), the Parent Reports did not, and any Parent Reports
filed with the SEC subsequent to the date hereof will not,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to
make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances
in which they were made, not misleading. The Parent Reports
included or will include all certificates required to be
included therein pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the
SOX Act, and the internal control report and attestation of
Parents outside auditors required by Section 404 of
the SOX Act. |
|
|
(ii) Each of the consolidated balance sheets included in or
incorporated by reference into the Parent Reports (including the
related notes and schedules) fairly presents, or, in the case of
Parent Reports filed |
A-23
|
|
|
after the date hereof, will fairly present the consolidated
financial position of Parent and any other entity included
therein and their respective Subsidiaries as of its date and
each of the consolidated statements of income, shareowners
equity and cash flows included in or incorporated by reference
into the Parent Reports (including any related notes and
schedules) fairly presents, or in the case of Parent Reports
filed after the date hereof, will fairly present, the net
income, total shareowners equity and net increase in cash
and cash equivalents, as the case may be, of Parent and any
other entity included therein and their respective Subsidiaries
for the periods set forth therein (subject, in the case of
unaudited statements, to notes and normal year-end audit
adjustments that will not be material in amount or effect), in
each case in accordance with GAAP consistently applied during
the periods involved, except as may be noted therein. |
|
|
(iii) The management of Parent has (x) implemented
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) to ensure that material
information relating to Parent, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to the management of Parent by
others within those entities, and (y) has disclosed, based
on its most recent evaluation, to Parents outside auditors
and the audit committee of the Board of Directors of Parent
(A) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange
Act) which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Parents ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and (B) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in Parents internal controls over
financial reporting. Since the Audit Date, any material change
in internal control over financial reporting required to be
disclosed in any Parent Report has been so disclosed. |
|
|
(iv) Since the Audit Date, (x) neither Parent nor any
of its Subsidiaries nor, to the knowledge of the officers of
Parent, any director, officer, employee, auditor, accountant or
representative of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has received
or otherwise had or obtained knowledge of any material
complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, whether written or
oral, regarding the accounting or auditing practices,
procedures, methodologies or methods of Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries or their respective internal accounting controls
relating to periods after the Audit Date, including any material
complaint, allegation, assertion or claim that Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries has engaged in questionable accounting or
auditing practices (except for any of the foregoing after the
date hereof which have no reasonable basis), and (y) no
attorney representing Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, whether
or not employed by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, has
reported evidence of a material violation of securities Laws,
breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation, relating to
periods after the Audit Date, by Parent or any of its officers,
directors, employees or agents to the Board of Directors of
Parent or any committee thereof or, to the knowledge of the
officers of Parent, to any director or officer of Parent;
provided, however, that with respect to Cingular
LLC and its Subsidiaries all of the representations and
warranties in this Section 5.2(f)(iv) shall be only to the
knowledge of the officers of Parent. |
|
|
(g) Litigation and Liabilities. (i) As of the
date of this Agreement, there are no civil, criminal or
administrative actions, suits, claims, hearings, arbitrations,
investigations or proceedings pending or, to the knowledge of
the officers of Parent, threatened against Parent or Merger Sub
that seek to enjoin, or would reasonably be expected to have the
effect of preventing, making illegal, or otherwise interfering
with, any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
except as would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. There are no (A) civil, criminal or administrative
actions, suits, claims, hearings, investigations or proceedings
pending or, to the knowledge of the officers of Parent,
threatened against Parent or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or
(B) litigations, arbitrations, investigations or other
proceedings, or injunctions or final judgments relating to,
pending or, to the knowledge of the officers of Parent,
threatened against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries before any
Governmental Entity, including without limitation the FCC,
except in the case of either clause (A) or (B), for
those that would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. None of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates
is a party to or subject to the provisions of any judgment,
order, writ, injunction, decree or award |
A-24
|
|
|
of any Governmental Entity which would, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Parent Material
Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(ii) There are no liabilities or obligations of Parent or
any Subsidiary of Parent, whether or not accrued, contingent or
otherwise and whether or not required to be disclosed, or any
other facts or circumstances that would reasonably be expected
to result in any obligations or liabilities of, Parent or any of
its Subsidiaries, other than: |
|
|
|
(A) liabilities or obligations to the extent
(I) reflected on the consolidated balance sheet of Parent
or (II) readily apparent in the notes thereto, in each case
included in Parents quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2004; |
|
|
(B) liabilities or obligations incurred in the ordinary
course of business since September 30, 2004; |
|
|
(C) performance obligations under contracts required in
accordance with their terms, or performance obligations, to the
extent required under applicable Law, in each case to the extent
arising after the date hereof; or |
|
|
(D) liabilities or obligations that would not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a
Parent Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
|
(h) Compliance with Laws. The businesses of each of
Parent and its Subsidiaries have not been conducted in violation
of any Laws, except for such violations that would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
result in a Parent Material Adverse Effect. No investigation or
review by any Governmental Entity with respect to Parent or any
of its Subsidiaries is pending or, to the knowledge of the
officers of Parent, threatened, except for any such
investigations or reviews that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Parent Material
Adverse Effect. Each of Parent and its Subsidiaries has obtained
and is in substantial compliance with all Licenses necessary to
conduct its business as presently conducted, except those the
absence of which would not, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. |
|
|
(i) Absence of Changes. Since the Audit Date, Parent
and its Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses
only in, and have not engaged in any material transaction other
than in accordance with, the ordinary course of such businesses.
Since the Audit Date, there has not been any Parent Material
Adverse Effect or any event, occurrence, discovery or
development which would, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to result in a Parent Material Adverse
Effect. |
ARTICLE VI
Covenants
6.1. Interim
Operations. (i) The Company shall not
knowingly take or permit any of its Subsidiaries to take any
action or refrain from taking any action the result of which
would be reasonably and foreseeably likely to prevent the
consummation of the Merger by the Termination Date, except as
expressly and specifically permitted by Section 6.2. The
Company covenants and agrees as to itself and its Subsidiaries
that, after the date hereof and prior to the Effective Time,
unless Parent shall otherwise approve in writing (such approval
not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), and except as
otherwise expressly contemplated by this Agreement or as
required by applicable Laws, the business of it and its
Subsidiaries shall be conducted in the ordinary and usual course
and, to the extent consistent therewith, it and its Subsidiaries
shall use their respective reasonable best efforts to preserve
their business organizations intact and maintain existing
relations and goodwill with Governmental Entities, customers,
suppliers, distributors, creditors, lessors, employees and
business associates and keep available the services of the
present employees and agents of the Company and its
Subsidiaries. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing
and in furtherance thereof, from the date of this Agreement
until the Effective Time, except (A) as otherwise expressly
required by this Agreement, (B) as Parent may approve in
writing (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or
delayed) or (C) as
A-25
set forth in Section 6.1(i) of the Company Disclosure
Letter, the Company will not and will not permit its
Subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
(a) adopt or propose any change in its certificate of
incorporation or by-laws or other applicable governing
instruments or amend any term of the Shares; |
|
|
(b) merge or consolidate the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries with any other Person, except for any such
transactions among wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the Company that
are not obligors or guarantors of third-party indebtedness, or
adopt a plan of liquidation; |
|
|
(c) acquire assets outside of the ordinary course of
business from any other Person with a value or purchase price in
excess of $100,000,000 in the aggregate, other than acquisitions
pursuant to Contracts to the extent in effect immediately prior
to the execution of this Agreement and as otherwise set forth in
Section 6.1(i)(c) of the Company Disclosure Letter, and
other than capital expenditures within the Companys
capital expenditure budget as set forth in
Section 6.1(i)(l) of the Company Disclosure Letter; |
|
|
(d) (i) enter into any material line of business in
any geographic area other than the current lines of business of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and in the geographic
areas where they are currently conducted, as of the date hereof
or (ii) engage in the conduct of any business in any state
which would require the receipt or transfer of a Communications
License or foreign country that would require the receipt or
transfer of a Company License, in each case other than as
expressly permitted by Section 6.1(i)(d) of the Company
Disclosure Letter and other than as would not prevent or delay
consummation of the Merger; |
|
|
(e) file for any Company License outside of the ordinary
course of business, other than in connection with any
acquisition permitted under clause (c) hereof and other
than as would not prevent or delay consummation of the Merger; |
|
|
(f) other than as set forth in Section 6.1(i)(f) of
the Company Disclosure Letter and other than the issuance of
shares pursuant to Company Stock Plans or pursuant to the
Companys dividend reinvestment program, issue, sell,
pledge, dispose of, grant, transfer, lease, license, guarantee,
encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale, pledge, disposition,
grant, transfer, lease, license, guarantee or encumbrance of,
any shares of capital stock of the Company or any its
Subsidiaries (other than the issuance of shares by a wholly
owned Subsidiary of the Company to the Company or another wholly
owned Subsidiary), or securities convertible or exchangeable
into or exercisable for any shares of such capital stock, or any
options, warrants, conversion rights, stock appreciation rights,
redemption rights, repurchase rights, agreements, arrangements,
calls, commitments or other rights of any kind to acquire any
shares of such capital stock or such convertible or exchangeable
securities; |
|
|
(g) other than in connection with existing receivables
facilities and securitizations and renewals thereof in the
ordinary course of business, or in connection with the
refinancing of the Companys indebtedness under its
existing credit facility, create or incur any Lien material to
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries on any assets of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries having a value in excess of
$50,000,000; |
|
|
(h) make any loans, advances or capital contributions to or
investments in any Person (other than the Company or any direct
or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company) in excess of
$25,000,000 in the aggregate; |
|
|
(i) declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution
(whether in cash, stock or property or any combination thereof)
on (i) any shares of Company Common Stock other than
pursuant to Section 6.18 of this Agreement or the
Companys regular quarterly dividend of $.2375 per
share in cash per quarter at record and payment dates consistent
with past practices, provided that the Company shall
designate the record dates for the Companys quarterly
dividends to coincide with the record dates for Parents
quarterly dividends set forth on Section 6.1(i) of the
Parent Disclosure Letter, beginning with the record |
A-26
|
|
|
date on July 10, 2005, or (ii) any shares of capital
stock of any Subsidiary (other than wholly-owned Subsidiaries
and pro rata dividends payable to holders of interests in non
wholly-owned Subsidiaries); |
|
|
(j) reclassify, split, combine, subdivide or repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire, directly or indirectly, any of its
capital stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into or
exercisable for any shares of its capital stock; |
|
|
(k) incur any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantee
such indebtedness of another Person, or issue or sell any debt
securities or warrants or other rights to acquire any debt
security of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except for
(i) indebtedness for borrowed money incurred in the
ordinary course of business not to exceed $100,000,000 in the
aggregate, (ii) indebtedness for borrowed money in
replacement of existing indebtedness for borrowed money on
customary commercial terms, (iii) guarantees by the Company
of indebtedness of wholly-owned Subsidiaries of the Company or
guarantees by Subsidiaries of indebtedness of the Company, or
(iv) interest rate swaps on customary commercial terms
consistent with past practice and not to exceed $100,000,000 of
notional debt in the aggregate in addition to notional debt
currently under swap or similar arrangements; |
|
|
(l) except as set forth in Section 6.1(i)(l) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, make or authorize any capital
expenditure; |
|
|
(m) other than in the ordinary course of business, enter
into any Contract that would have been a Material Contract had
it been entered into prior to the date of this Agreement (other
than as permitted by Section 6.1(i)(d), (e) or (k)); |
|
|
(n) make any changes with respect to accounting policies or
procedures, except as required by changes in GAAP or by
applicable Law or except as the Company, based upon the advice
of its independent auditors after consultation with Parent,
determines in good faith is advisable to conform to best
accounting practices; |
|
|
(o) settle any litigation or other proceedings before or
threatened to be brought before a Governmental Entity for an
amount to be paid by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in
excess of $50,000,000 or which would be reasonably likely to
have any adverse impact on the operations of the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries; provided that with respect to any
Federal income tax audit of the Company and its consolidated
Subsidiaries, such audit may be settled without regard to the
foregoing $50,000,000 limitation; and provided,
further, that with respect to such Federal audit, the
Company shall consult with Parent at least 30 business days
prior to the issuance of a Revenue Agent Report or an agreement
with respect to a final settlement in appeals, although the
final determination of such matters shall be in the sole
discretion of the Company; and provided, further,
that any amount of Taxes for which the Company reasonably
believes that another Person will indemnify the Company pursuant
to such Persons obligations under the tax sharing
agreements listed in Section 6.1(i)(q) of the Company
Disclosure Letter shall not be considered as an amount paid in
settlement of a litigation or other proceeding for purposes of
this Section 6.1(i)(o); |
|
|
(p) other than in the ordinary course of business,
(i) amend or modify in any material respect, or terminate
or waive any material right or benefit under, any Material
Contract (other than as permitted by Section 6.1(i)(d),
(e) or (k)), or (ii) cancel, modify or waive any debts
or claims held by it or waive any rights having in each case a
value in excess of $25,000,000; |
|
|
(q) except as required by Law or by any currently effective
tax sharing agreement listed in Section 6.1(i)(q) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, make any material Tax election or
take any material position on any material Tax Return filed on
or after the date of this Agreement or adopt any method therefor
that is inconsistent with elections made, positions taken or
methods used in preparing or filing similar Tax Returns in prior
periods. Anything in this Section 6.1(q) to the contrary
notwithstanding, with respect to methods of accounting and
elections referred to on Section 6.1(q) of the Company
Disclosure Letter, the Company shall consult with Parent,
although the final determination of the positions taken or the
elections made shall be in the sole discretion of the Company. |
A-27
|
|
|
(r) sell, lease, license or otherwise dispose of any assets
of the Company or its Subsidiaries except (i) in the
ordinary course of business or obsolete assets or
(ii) sales, leases, licenses or other dispositions of
assets with a fair market value not in excess of $50,000,000 in
respect of any one asset and not in excess of $100,000,000 in
the aggregate other than (x) as set forth in
Section 6.1(i)(r) of the Company Disclosure Letter and
(y) any dispositions of assets to the extent used as
consideration for acquisitions that are permitted pursuant to
Section 6.1(i)(c); |
|
|
(s) except as required pursuant to existing written,
binding agreements in effect prior to the date of this Agreement
or as otherwise required by applicable Law, (i) enter into
any commitment to provide any severance or termination benefits
to (or amend any existing arrangement with) any director,
officer or employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
other than for severance or termination benefits to employees
(other than Section 16 Officers) in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice and pursuant to the terms
of plans, programs or arrangements in effect prior to the date
of this Agreement and disclosed on Section 5.1(h) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, (ii) increase the benefits
payable under any existing severance or termination benefit
policy or employment agreement (other than as required to be
increased pursuant to the existing terms of any such policy or
agreement or as a result of ordinary pay raises or promotions),
(iii) enter into any employment severance, change in
control, termination, deferred compensation or other similar
agreement (or amend any such existing agreement) with any
director, officer or employee of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries other than pursuant to the terms of any
Compensation or Benefit Plan in effect on the date hereof,
(iv) establish, adopt, amend or terminate any Compensation
and Benefit Plan, except for technical amendments in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
provided that such amendments do not materially increase the
cost of such arrangements to the Company, (v) increase the
compensation, bonus or other benefits of, make any new awards
under any Compensation and Benefit Plan to, or pay any bonus to
any director, officer, employee, consultant or independent
contractor of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except for
increases, new awards or payments in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice for employees who are not
among the Companys Section 16 Officers,
(vi) take any action to fund or in any other way secure the
payment of compensation or benefits under any Compensation and
Benefit Plan, except as required pursuant to the terms thereof,
(vii) take any action to accelerate the vesting or payment
of any compensation or benefits under any Compensation and
Benefit Plans, to the extent not already required in any such
Compensation and Benefit Plan, (viii) other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
materially change any actuarial or other assumptions used to
calculate funding obligations with respect to any Compensation
and Benefit Plan or change the manner in which contributions to
such plans are made or the basis on which such contributions are
determined, except as may be required by GAAP, (ix) amend
the terms of any outstanding equity-based award,
(x) provide for accelerated vesting, removal of
restrictions or exercisability of any stock based or stock
related awards (including stock options, stock appreciation
rights, performance units and restricted stock units) upon a
change in control occurring on or prior to the Effective Time
for any grants made after the date of this Agreement,
(xi) exercise any discretion to cash out awards pursuant to
the Companys 1997 Long Term Incentive Program or
(xii) enter into any new collective bargaining agreements
(or amendments to existing collective bargaining agreements);
provided, however, that the prohibitions contained
in the foregoing clauses (i) and (v) shall not apply
in connection with newly hired or newly promoted employees, in
each case to the extent consistent with past practice; |
|
|
(t) fail to initiate appropriate steps to renew any
material Company Licenses held by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries that are scheduled to terminate prior to or within
60 days after the Effective Time or to prosecute any
pending applications for any material Company License; or |
|
|
(u) agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
|
|
(ii) The Company will provide Parent with a schedule
setting forth a true and complete list as of the date of this
Agreement of (A) within five (5) days of the date of
this Agreement, all Licenses issued or granted to the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries by the FCC (FCC
Licenses), all Licenses issued or granted to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries by State Commissions
regulating telecommunications businesses or services
(State Licenses) and all Licenses
issued or granted to the Company or any of its |
A-28
|
|
|
subsidiaries by foreign Governmental Entities regulating
telecommunications businesses or services or the use of radio
spectrum (Foreign Licenses) that are
identified on Section 6.1(ii)(A) of the Company Disclosure
Letter; (B) within thirty (30) days, all Foreign
Licenses other than those referenced in
clause (A) above, all Licenses issued or granted to
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by any local government
regulating telecommunications businesses or services or
authorizing the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to place
facilities within the boundary of such local government
(Local Licenses), and all Licenses
administered by the (v) U.S. State Department, Office
of Defense Trade Controls Licensing; (w) U.S. Commerce
Department, Bureau of Industry and Security;
(x) U.S. Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets
Controls; or (y) equivalent licensing requirements in any
country in which the Company and its Affiliates are doing
business (the FCC Licenses, State Licenses, Foreign Licenses and
Local Licenses, together with all other Licenses of the Company
and its Subsidiaries, the Company
Licenses); (C) within thirty (30) days,
all pending applications for Licenses that would be Company
Licenses if issued or granted; (D) within thirty
(30) days, all pending applications by the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries for modification, extension or renewal of
any Company License; and (E) within thirty (30) days,
to the extent not disclosed on Schedule 5.1(j)(i) of the
Company Disclosure Letter, any agreements to acquire (I) a
License that upon acquisition by the Company would become a
Company License or (II) any interest in an entity that
holds a License that upon acquisition of such entity by the
Company would become a Foreign License. The failure of the
Company to provide Parent with the schedules provided in the
foregoing clauses (B), (C), (D) and (E) within
the time periods specified in such clauses shall not constitute
a breach of this Agreement, provided that the Company has
used its reasonable best efforts to provide such schedules by
the applicable dates. |
|
|
(iii) Parent shall not knowingly take or permit any of its
Subsidiaries to take any action or refrain from taking any
action the result of which would be reasonably and foreseeably
likely to prevent the consummation of the Merger by the
Termination Date. Without limiting the foregoing, Parent shall
not, and it shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, enter into any
agreement for the acquisition of any business or Person which
provides interexchange telecommunications or long distance
services, other than (x) the provision of such services in
de minimis amounts or (y) any provision of such
services solely as a component of the provision of mobile
wireless voice or data services. Without limiting the generality
of the foregoing, from the date of this Agreement until the
Effective Time, except (A) as otherwise expressly required
by this Agreement, (B) as the Company may approve in
writing (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or
delayed) or (C) as set forth in Section 6.1(iii) of
the Parent Disclosure Letter, Parent will not and will not
permit its Subsidiaries to: |
|
|
|
(a) adopt or propose any material change in Parents
certificate of incorporation or by laws or other applicable
governing instruments or amend any term of the shares of Parent
Common Stock; |
|
|
(b) merge or consolidate Parent or Merger Sub with any
other Person or adopt a plan of liquidation; |
|
|
(c) enter into or acquire any new line of business that
(i) is material to Parent and its Subsidiaries taken as a
whole and (ii) is not strategically related to the current
business or operations of Parent and its Subsidiaries; |
|
|
(d) except for shares of Parent Common Stock issued for
fair value in arms length transactions and other than the
issuance of shares in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practices pursuant to Parent employee benefit plans,
issue, sell, pledge, dispose of, grant, transfer, lease,
license, guarantee, encumber, or authorize the issuance, sale,
pledge, disposition, grant, transfer, lease, license, guarantee
or encumbrance of, any shares of capital stock of Parent or any
its Subsidiaries (other than the issuance of shares by a wholly
owned Subsidiary of Parent to the Company or another wholly
owned Subsidiary), or securities convertible or exchangeable
into or exercisable for any shares of such capital stock, or any
options, warrants, conversion rights, stock appreciation rights,
redemption rights, repurchase rights, agreements, arrangements,
calls, commitments or other rights of any kind to acquire any
shares of such capital stock or such convertible or exchangeable
securities; |
A-29
|
|
|
(e) declare, set aside or pay any dividend or distribution
(whether in cash, stock or property or any combination thereof)
on any shares of Parent Common Stock or on any shares of capital
stock of any Subsidiary, other than (i) by wholly owned
Subsidiaries and pro rata dividends or distributions payable to
holders of interests in non wholly owned Subsidiaries and
(ii) Parents regular quarterly dividend, including
any increases thereof, at record and payment dates consistent
with past practices; |
|
|
(f) reclassify, split, combine or subdivide, or repurchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire at prices above fair market value,
directly or indirectly, any of its capital stock or securities
convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for any shares
of its capital stock; or |
|
|
(g) agree or commit to do any of the foregoing. |
|
|
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this
Section 6.1(iii), to the extent they relate to Cingular LLC
and its Subsidiaries, Parents obligations in
Section 6.1(iii) shall be limited to taking such steps,
such as the exercise of any veto rights, that are within the
unilateral power and control of Parent and its Subsidiaries
(other than Cingular LLC and its Subsidiaries), and none of the
foregoing shall require any of Parents representatives (or
require Parent to compel any of its representatives) to take any
actions that would violate the fiduciary duties of such
representatives under applicable Law with respect to any
beneficial owners of equity securities of Cingular LLC or its
Affiliates other than Parent or any of its Subsidiaries. |
6.2. Acquisition
Proposals. (a) The Company agrees that neither it
nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of the officers and
directors of it or any of its Subsidiaries shall, and that it
shall cause its and its Subsidiaries employees, agents and
representatives, including any investment banker, attorney or
accountant retained by it or any of its Subsidiaries
(Representatives), not to, directly or
indirectly, initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or
facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer
with respect to (1) a merger, reorganization, share
exchange, consolidation or similar transaction involving the
Company, (2) any purchase of an equity interest or
interests representing, in the aggregate, an amount equal to or
greater than a 15% voting or economic interest in the Company or
(3) any purchase of assets, securities or ownership
interests representing an amount equal to or greater than 15% of
the consolidated assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole (any such inquiry, proposal or offer being
hereinafter referred to as an Acquisition
Proposal). The Company further agrees that neither
it nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of the officers and
directors of it or any of its Subsidiaries shall, and that it
shall cause its and its Subsidiaries Representatives not
to, directly or indirectly, have any discussions with, or
provide any confidential information or data to, or engage in
any negotiations with, any Person relating to an Acquisition
Proposal, or otherwise knowingly encourage or facilitate any
effort or attempt by any Person other than Parent and Merger Sub
to make or implement an Acquisition Proposal; provided,
however, that nothing contained in this Agreement shall
prevent the Company or its Board of Directors from
(i) complying with its disclosure obligations under
Sections 14d-9 and 14e-2 of the Exchange Act with regard to
an Acquisition Proposal; provided, further,
however, that if such disclosure has the substantive
effect of withdrawing, modifying or qualifying the
Directors Recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent or
the adoption of this Agreement by the Board of Directors of the
Company, Parent shall have the right to terminate this Agreement
as set forth in Section 8.4(a); and (ii) at any time
prior to, but not after, the time this Agreement is adopted by
the Company Requisite Vote, (A) providing information in
response to a request therefor by a Person who has made an
unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal if the Board
of Directors of the Company receives from the Person so
requesting such information an executed confidentiality
agreement (excluding standstill provisions) on customary terms;
(B) engaging in any discussions or negotiations with any
Person who has made an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition
Proposal if the Board of Directors of the Company receives from
such Person an executed confidentiality agreement (excluding
standstill provisions) on customary terms; or
(C) recommending or agreeing to recommend such an
unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition Proposal to the
shareholders of the Company, if and only to the extent that,
(x) in each such case referred to in clause (A),
(B) or (C) above, the Board of Directors of the
Company determines in good faith after consultation with outside
legal counsel that such action is necessary in order for its
directors to comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable
Law; (y) in the case referred to in clause (B) or
(C) above, the Board
A-30
of Directors of the Company determines in good faith (after
consultation with its financial advisor and outside counsel),
taking into account all legal, financial and regulatory aspects
of the proposal, the likelihood of obtaining financing, and the
Person making the proposal, that such Acquisition Proposal, if
consummated, is more favorable, from a financial point of view
(taking into account the likelihood of consummation), to the
Companys shareholders than the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement, in each case taking into account any
revisions to the terms of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement pursuant to Section 6.2(c); and (z) in the
case of clause (C), Parent shall have had written notice of
the Companys intention to take the action referred to in
clause (C) (a Notice of Superior
Proposal) at least five business days prior to the
taking of such action by the Company and the Company shall have
complied with the provisions of Section 6.2(c);
provided, that any more favorable Acquisition Proposal
referred to in clause (y) above must involve at least
50% of the assets or equity securities of the Company rather
than the 15% used in the definition of Acquisition Proposal (any
such more favorable Acquisition Proposal being referred to in
this Agreement as a Superior Proposal).
(b) The Company agrees that it will immediately cease and
cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or
negotiations with any Person conducted heretofore with respect
to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company will promptly request
each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality
agreement in connection with its consideration of a transaction
with the Company to return or destroy all confidential
information furnished prior to the execution of this Agreement
to or for the benefit of such Person by or on behalf of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries. The Company agrees that it
will take the necessary steps to promptly inform its
Representatives of the obligations undertaken in this
Section 6.2.
(c) The Company agrees that it will notify Parent as
promptly as practicable (and, in any event, within
24 hours) if any inquiries, proposals or offers with
respect to any Acquisition Proposal or potential Acquisition
Proposal are received by, any such information is requested
from, or any such discussions or negotiations are sought to be
initiated or continued with, it or any of its Representatives,
indicating, in connection with such notice, the name of such
Person and the material terms and conditions of any proposal or
offer and thereafter shall keep Parent informed, on a current
basis, on the status and terms of any such proposal or offer and
the status of any such discussions or negotiations. The Company
agrees that (i) during the five-business day period prior
to its taking any action referred to in clause (ii)(C) of
the proviso in Section 6.2(a) with respect to an
Acquisition Proposal, the Company and its Representatives shall
negotiate in good faith with Parent and its Representatives
regarding any revisions to the terms of the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement proposed by Parent and
(ii) the Company may take any such action with respect to
an Acquisition Proposal that was a Superior Proposal only if
such Acquisition Proposal continues to be a Superior Proposal in
light of any revisions to the terms of the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement to which Parent shall have agreed
prior to the expiration of such five business-day period;
provided that no such Acquisition Proposal shall be
deemed to be a Superior Proposal for purposes of this
Section 6.2 if (A) Parent shall have agreed to
revisions to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
(B) the Board of Directors of the Company shall not have
reasonably determined in good faith that such transactions as so
revised are not substantially equivalent to or better than such
Acquisition Proposal, from a financial point of view (taking
into account the likelihood of consummation), to the
shareholders of the Company. The Company agrees that it will
deliver to Parent a new Notice of Superior Proposal with respect
to each Acquisition Proposal that has been materially revised or
modified prior to taking any action to recommend or agreeing to
recommend such Acquisition Proposal to the shareholders of the
Company and that a new five business-day period shall commence,
for purposes of this Section 6.2(c), with respect to each
such materially revised or modified Acquisition Proposal from
the time Parent receives a Notice of Superior Proposal with
respect thereto. The Company also agrees to provide any
information to Parent that it is providing to another Person
pursuant to this Section 6.2 at the same time it provides
it to such other Person.
6.3. Information
Supplied. Each of the Company and Parent agrees, as to
itself and its Affiliates, that none of the information supplied
or to be supplied by it or any of its Subsidiaries for inclusion
or incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration
Statement on Form S-4 to be filed with the SEC by Parent in
connection with the issuance of the shares of Parent Common
Stock in the Merger (including the prospectus and proxy
statement (the Prospectus/Proxy
Statement) constituting a part thereof) (the
S-4 Registration State-
A-31
ment) and any amendment or supplement
thereto will, at the time the S-4 Registration Statement becomes
effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, and (ii) the Prospectus/ Proxy
Statement and any amendment or supplement thereto will, at the
date of mailing to shareholders of the Company and at the time
of the Shareholders Meeting (as defined in Section 6.4),
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
Company and Parent will cause the S-4 Registration Statement to
comply as to form in all material respects with the applicable
provisions of the Securities Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
6.4. Shareholders Meeting;
Subsidiary Preferred Stock. (a) The Company will
take, in accordance with applicable Law and its certificate of
incorporation and by-laws, all action necessary to convene a
meeting of holders of Shares (the Shareholders
Meeting) as promptly as practicable after the S-4
Registration Statement is declared effective, and in any event
will use its reasonable best efforts to convene the Shareholders
Meeting not later than 120 days after the date of this
Agreement (or, if later, not more than 60 days after
effectiveness of the S-4 Registration Statement), to consider
and vote upon the adoption of this Agreement. Subject to its
fiduciary duties under applicable Law, the Board of Directors of
the Company shall make the Directors Recommendation, the
Directors Recommendation shall be included in the
Prospectus/ Proxy Statement and the Board of Directors of the
Company shall take all lawful action to solicit the adoption of
this Agreement by the holders of Shares. In the event that
subsequent to the date of this Agreement the Board of Directors
of the Company determines after consultation with outside
counsel that its fiduciary duties under applicable Law require
it to withdraw, modify or qualify the Directors
Recommendation in a manner adverse to Parent, the Board of
Directors of the Company may, subject to the requirements of
Section 6.2, so withdraw, modify or qualify the
Directors Recommendation, provided, however,
that, subject to Section 6.4(a) of the Company Disclosure
Letter, the Company shall nevertheless submit this Agreement to
the holders of Shares for adoption at the Shareholders Meeting
and shall use its reasonable best efforts to do so within the
time period prescribed herein.
(b) Prior to the Effective Date, the Company shall and
shall cause its Subsidiaries, as necessary, to effect an
exchange of all of the Subsidiary Preferred Shares then
outstanding for shares of a new series of Company Preferred
Shares established by the Board of Directors of the Company (the
Substitute Preferred Shares) having
rights, preferences and limitations substantially identical to
the rights, preferences and limitations of the Subsidiary
Preferred Shares set forth in Article Third, Part C.
of the Charter, except that in lieu of the provisions set forth
in Sections (C)(1) and (F) of such Article Third,
Part C., the entitlement of the Substitute Preferred Shares
in respect of a consolidation, merger, combination or other
similar transaction and the voting rights of the Substitute
Preferred Shares shall be as set forth in Schedule 6.4(b)
of the Parent Disclosure Letter. Such exchange shall be effected
on the basis of one Substitute Preferred Share for each
Subsidiary Preferred Share, with each fraction of a Subsidiary
Preferred Share being exchanged for an equal fraction of a
Substitute Preferred Share. Upon consummation of such exchange,
the Subsidiary Preferred Shares shall be cancelled by the
Company in accordance with Section 515 of the NYBCL and
shall not be reissued. The Board of Directors of the Company
shall take all other actions necessary so that immediately prior
to the Effective Time, the only Company Preferred Shares
outstanding shall be 768,391.4 Substitute Preferred Shares and
that all of such Substitute Preferred Shares shall then be held
of record and beneficially only by wholly owned Subsidiaries of
the Company.
6.5. Filings; Other Actions;
Notification. (a) Parent and the Company shall
promptly after the date of this Agreement prepare and Parent
shall file with the SEC the S-4 Registration Statement as
promptly as practicable thereafter. Parent shall use its
reasonable best efforts to have the S-4 Registration Statement
declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as
practicable after such filing, and the Company shall promptly
thereafter mail the Prospectus/Proxy Statement to the holders of
Shares.
(b) The Company and Parent shall cooperate with each other
and use (and shall cause their respective Subsidiaries to use)
their respective reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be
taken all actions, and do or cause to be done all things,
necessary, proper or advisable on its part under this Agreement
and applicable
A-32
Laws to consummate and make effective the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement as soon as
practicable, including preparing and filing as promptly as
practicable all documentation to effect all necessary notices,
reports and other filings (including by filing no later than 20
business days after Parents receipt of the schedule to be
provided by the Company pursuant to Section 6.1(ii)(A) all
applications required to be filed with the FCC and the
notification and required form under the HSR Act;
provided, however, that the failure to file within
20 business days will not constitute a breach of this Agreement)
and to obtain as promptly as practicable all consents,
registrations, approvals, permits and authorizations necessary
or advisable to be obtained from any third party and/or any
Governmental Entity in order to consummate the Merger or any of
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
provided, however, that nothing in this
Section 6.5 (i) shall require, or be construed to
require, Parent or the Company to take or to refrain from taking
any action, to agree to any restriction with respect to any
assets or operations of Parent or the Company or their
respective Subsidiaries, or to cause their respective
Subsidiaries to do or agree to do any of the foregoing, in each
case that would take effect prior to the Effective Time, or
(ii) shall require, or be construed to require, Parent or
the Company to take or to refrain from taking any action, to
agree to any restriction with respect to any assets or
operations of Parent or the Company or their respective
Subsidiaries, or to cause their respective Subsidiaries to do or
agree to do any of the foregoing, if any such action, failure to
act, restriction or agreement, individually or in the aggregate,
would reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect
or a material adverse effect on Parent and its Subsidiaries
following the Effective Time (it being understood that, for this
purpose, materiality shall be considered by reference to the
properties, assets, liabilities, business and results of
operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, rather than that of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as
a whole), in each case applying the principles set forth in
Section 6.5(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter (a
Specified Material Adverse Effect).
Subject to applicable Laws relating to the exchange of
information, Parent and the Company shall have the right to
review in advance, and to the extent practicable each will
consult the other on, all of the information relating to Parent
or the Company, as the case may be, and any of their respective
Subsidiaries, that appears in any filing made with, or written
materials submitted to, any third party and/or any Governmental
Entity in connection with the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (including the
S-4 Registration Statement). To the extent permitted by
law, each party shall provide the other with copies of all
correspondence between it (or its advisors) and any Governmental
Entity relating to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and, to the extent reasonably practicable, all
telephone calls and meetings with a Governmental Entity
regarding the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall
include Representatives of Parent and the Company. In exercising
the foregoing rights, each of the Company and Parent shall act
reasonably and as promptly as practicable.
(c) To the extent permitted by law, the Company and Parent
each shall, upon request by the other, furnish the other with
all information concerning itself, its Affiliates, directors,
officers and stockholders and such other matters as may be
reasonably necessary or advisable in connection with the S-4
Registration Statement or any other statement, filing, notice or
application made by or on behalf of Parent, the Company or any
of their respective Affiliates to any third party and/or any
Governmental Entity in connection with the Merger and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(d) Subject to applicable Laws and the instructions of any
Governmental Entity, the Company and Parent each shall keep the
other apprised of the status of matters relating to completion
of the transactions contemplated hereby, including promptly
furnishing the other with copies of notices or other
communications received by Parent or the Company, as the case
may be, or any of its Subsidiaries, from any third party and/or
any Governmental Entity with respect to the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Company shall
give prompt notice to Parent of any change, fact or condition of
which any of its officers has knowledge that is reasonably
expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or of any
failure of any condition to Parents obligations to effect
the Merger. Parent shall give prompt notice to the Company of
any change, fact or condition of which any of its officers has
knowledge that is reasonably expected to result in a Parent
Material Adverse Effect or of any failure of any condition to
the Companys obligations to effect the Merger.
A-33
(e) Subject to the second proviso set forth in
Section 6.5(b), Parents and the Companys
obligations under this Section 6.5 shall include, without
limitation, the obligation to use their respective reasonable
best efforts to defend any lawsuits or other legal proceedings,
whether judicial or administrative, challenging the consummation
of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated hereby,
including using reasonable best efforts to seek to have any stay
or other injunctive relief which would prevent or materially
delay or impair the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement entered by any court or other
Governmental Entity reversed on appeal or vacated.
(f) Each of the Company and Parent will promptly notify the
other if it becomes aware of any significant deficiencies in its
internal control over financial reporting that, alone or
combined with other significant deficiencies, would constitute a
material weakness in its internal control over financial
reporting.
6.6. Access and
Reports. Subject to applicable Law, upon reasonable
notice, the Company shall (and shall cause its Subsidiaries to)
afford Parents officers and other authorized
Representatives (including environmental consultants) reasonable
access, during normal business hours throughout the period prior
to the Effective Time, to its properties, books, contracts and
records and, during such period, the Company shall (and shall
cause its Subsidiaries to) furnish promptly to Parent all
information concerning its business, properties and personnel as
may reasonably be requested, provided that no
investigation pursuant to this Section 6.6 shall affect or
be deemed to modify any representation or warranty made by the
Company herein, and provided, further, that the
foregoing shall not require the Company to permit any
inspection, or to disclose any information, that in the
reasonable judgment of the Company would result in the
disclosure of any trade secrets of third parties or violate any
of its obligations with respect to confidentiality if the
Company shall have used reasonable best efforts to obtain the
consent of such third party to such inspection or disclosure.
6.7. Publicity. The
initial press release disclosing this Agreement shall be a joint
press release and thereafter the Company and Parent each shall
consult with each other prior to issuing any press releases or
otherwise making public announcements with respect to the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
prior to making any filings with any third party or any
Governmental Entity (including any national securities exchange)
with respect thereto, except as may be required by applicable
Law or by obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with or
rules of any national securities exchange or by the request of
any Governmental Entity.
6.8. Employee
Benefits. (a) Parent agrees that it shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to honor all Compensation and Benefit
Plans in accordance with their terms as in effect immediately
before the Effective Time, subject to any amendment or
termination thereof that may be permitted by the terms of such
plan and applicable Law. Parent agrees that, for a period from
the Effective Time through the first anniversary of the last day
of the plan year of each Compensation and Benefit Plan in which
the Effective Time occurs, those individuals who as of the
Effective Time were employees or former employees of the Company
and its Subsidiaries (other than employees covered by a
collective bargaining agreement) (the Affected
Employees) shall be provided compensation and
employee benefits other than plans involving the issuance of
Shares and Company Awards and other than payments or benefits
made by reason of the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement or any incremental increase in
value attributable to the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement no less favorable in the
aggregate than those provided to the Affected Employees
immediately before the Effective Time provided,
however, that in determining whether and under what
standards equity compensation awards will be granted to Affected
Employees, Parent shall apply substantially the same criteria as
Parent uses for its other business units. For purposes of the
preceding sentence, in the case of any Compensation and Benefit
Plan for which the plan year is uncertain (or in the case of
compensation not provided under a Compensation and Benefit
Plan), the plan year shall be deemed to be the calendar year,
provided that, in any event, the period described in the
preceding sentence shall be greater than 12 months and less
than 24 months, provided that Parent agrees that to the
extent required under a Compensation and Benefit Plan in effect
as of the date of this Agreement it shall require any successor
to the Company, the Surviving Corporation or any portion of the
business or assets of the Company or the Surviving Corporation
to assume an appropriate portion of the obligations of Parent
under this Section 6.8. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
nothing contained herein shall obligate Parent, the Surviving
Corporation or any Affiliate of either of them to
(i) maintain any particular Compensation and Benefit Plan
A-34
(other than the Company Severance Plans, as defined in the
immediately following sentence, and the matters described on
Section 6.8 of the Company Disclosure Schedule),
(ii) grant or issue any equity or equity-based awards or
(iii) retain the employment of any Affected Employee.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, until the second anniversary of
the Effective Time, Parent shall or shall cause the Surviving
Corporation to continue each of the Severance Plans identified
in Section 6.8(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter (the
Company Severance Plans) without any
change that is adverse to the Affected Employees who participate
as of the Effective Time, to the extent required under each
Company Severance Plan as of the date of the Agreement.
(b) For all purposes under the compensation and employee
benefit plans, policies or arrangements of Parent and its
Affiliates providing benefits to any Affected Employees after
the Effective Time (the New Plans),
each Affected Employee shall receive credit for his or her
service with the Company and its Affiliates before the Effective
Time (including predecessor or acquired entities or any other
entities for which the Company and its Affiliates have given
credit for prior service), for purposes of eligibility, vesting
and benefit accrual (but not (i) for purposes of benefit
accrual under defined benefit pension or other retirement plans
or (ii) for any new program for which credit for benefit
accrual for service prior to the effective date of such program
is not given to similarly situated employees of Parent other
than the Affected Employees) to the same extent that such
Affected Employee was entitled, before the Effective Time, to
credit for such service under any similar or comparable
Compensation and Benefit Plans (except to the extent such credit
would result in a duplication of accrual of benefits). In
addition, if Affected Employees or their dependents are included
in any medical, dental, health or other welfare benefit plan,
program or arrangement (a Successor
Plan) other than the plan or plans in which they
participated immediately prior to the Effective Time (a
Prior Plan), each Affected Employee
immediately shall be eligible to participate, without any
waiting time, in any and all Successor Plans and such Successor
Plans shall not include any restrictions, limitations or
exclusionary provisions with respect to pre-existing conditions
exclusions, any actively-at-work requirements or any proof of
insurability requirements (except to the extent such exclusions
or requirements were applicable under any similar Prior Plan at
the Effective Time), and any eligible expenses incurred by any
Affected Employee and his or her covered dependents during the
portion of the plan year of the Prior Plan ending on the date of
the employees participation in this Successor Plan begins
shall be taken into account under this Successor Plan for
purposes of satisfying all deductible, coinsurance and maximum
out-of-pocket requirements applicable to the Affected Employee
and his or her covered dependents for the applicable plan year
as if these amounts had been paid in accordance with the
Successor Plan.
(c) With respect to matters described in this
Section 6.8 relating to benefits or compensation to be
provided after the Effective Time, the Company will to the
extent permitted by applicable Law provide Parent with copies of
any broad-based notices or other communication materials of a
general nature prior to sending them.
(d) Prior to the Closing, if requested by Parent in
writing, to the extent permitted by applicable Law and the terms
of the applicable plan or arrangement, the Company shall cause
to be amended the employee benefit plans and arrangements of it
and its Subsidiaries to the extent necessary to provide that no
employees of Parent and its Subsidiaries shall commence to
participate therein following the Effective Time unless the
Surviving Corporation or such Subsidiary explicitly authorizes
such participation. In addition, prior to the Closing, to the
extent permitted by applicable Law and the terms of the
applicable plan or arrangement, Parent shall cause to be amended
the employee benefit plans and arrangements of it and its
Subsidiaries to the extent necessary to provide that no
employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries shall commence to
participate therein following the Effective Time unless Parent
or such Subsidiary explicitly authorizes such participation.
(e) Parent shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation
and its Subsidiaries to honor the terms of any collective
bargaining agreements to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party.
(f) Parent shall take all necessary action to effectuate
the agreements set forth on Section 6.8(f) of the Company
Disclosure Letter.
(g) Parent shall cause its Board of Directors and the Board
of Directors of the Surviving Corporation to adopt prior to the
Effective Time such resolutions as may be requested by the
Company to exempt the
A-35
transactions contemplated by this Agreement from the provisions
of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act to the maximum extent
permitted by Law.
(h) the Company shall take the actions set forth on
Section 6.8(h) of the Company Disclosure Letter.
6.9. Expenses. Except
as otherwise provided in Sections 6.12, 6.13 and 8.5,
whether or not the Merger is consummated, all costs and expenses
incurred in connection with this Agreement and the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be
paid by the party incurring such expense.
6.10. Indemnification;
Directors and Officers Insurance.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, each of Parent and
the Surviving Corporation agrees that it will jointly and
severally indemnify and hold harmless each present director and
officer of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (in each case,
for acts or failures to act in such capacity), determined as of
the Effective Time (the Indemnified
Parties), against any costs or expenses (including
reasonable attorneys fees), judgments, fines, losses,
claims, damages or liabilities (collectively,
Costs) incurred in connection with any
claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of
matters existing or occurring at or prior to the Effective Time,
whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Effective
Time (including any matters arising in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement), to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable Law (and Parent or the Surviving
Corporation shall also advance expenses as incurred to the
fullest extent permitted under applicable Law, provided
that the Person to whom expenses are advanced provides an
undertaking to repay such advances if it is ultimately
determined that such Person is not entitled to indemnification);
and provided, further, that any determination as
to whether an Indemnified Person is entitled to indemnification
or advancement of expenses hereunder shall be made by
independent counsel selected by the Surviving Corporation and
such Person.
(b) Any Indemnified Party wishing to claim indemnification
under paragraph (a) of this Section 6.10, upon
learning of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation, shall promptly notify Parent thereof, but the
failure to so notify shall not relieve Parent of any liability
it may have to such Indemnified Party except to the extent such
failure materially and actually prejudices the indemnifying
party. In the event of any such claim, action, suit, proceeding
or investigation (whether arising before or after the Effective
Time), (i) Parent or the Surviving Corporation shall have
the right to assume the defense thereof and Parent shall not be
liable to such Indemnified Parties for any legal expenses of
other counsel or any other expenses subsequently incurred by
such Indemnified Parties in connection with the defense thereof,
except that if Parent or the Surviving Corporation does not
elect to assume such defense or counsel for the Indemnified
Parties advises that there are issues which raise conflicts of
interest between Parent or the Surviving Corporation and the
Indemnified Parties, the Indemnified Parties may retain counsel
satisfactory to them, and Parent and the Surviving Corporation
shall jointly and severally be obligated to pay all reasonable
fees and expenses of such counsel for the Indemnified Parties
promptly as statements therefor are received; provided,
however, that Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall
be obligated pursuant to this paragraph (b) to pay for
only one firm of counsel for all Indemnified Parties in any
jurisdiction unless the use of one counsel for such Indemnified
Parties would present such counsel with a conflict of interest;
provided, that the fewest number of counsel necessary to
avoid conflicts of interest shall be used; (ii) the
Indemnified Parties will use their reasonable efforts to
cooperate in the defense of any such matter, and
(iii) Parent and the Surviving Corporation shall not be
liable for any settlement effected without their prior written
consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or
delayed); and provided, further, that Parent and
the Surviving Corporation shall not have any obligation under
this Agreement to any Indemnified Party if and when a court of
competent jurisdiction shall ultimately determine, and such
determination shall have become final, that the indemnification
of such Indemnified Party in the manner contemplated hereby is
prohibited by applicable law.
(c) The Surviving Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause
the Surviving Corporation to, maintain the Companys
existing officers and directors liability insurance
(D&O Insurance) (including for
acts or omissions occurring in connection with this Agreement
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby)
covering each such Indemnified Person covered as of the
Effective Time by the Companys officers and
directors liability insurance policy on terms with respect
to coverage and amount no less favorable than those of such
policy in effect on the date hereof, for a period of six years
after the Effective
A-36
Time; provided, however, that in no event shall
the Surviving Corporation be required to expend in any one year
an amount in excess of 200% of the current annual premium paid
by the Company (which annual premium is set forth on
Schedule 6.10(c) of the Company Disclosure Letter) for such
insurance (such 200% amount, the Maximum Annual
Premium); provided, further, that if
the annual premiums of such insurance coverage exceed such
amount, the Surviving Corporation shall be obligated to obtain a
policy with the greatest coverage available for a cost not
exceeding the Maximum Annual Premium. In addition, the Company
may purchase a six-year tail prepaid policy prior to
the Effective Time on terms and conditions no less advantageous
to the Indemnified Parties than the existing directors and
officers liability insurance maintained by the Company;
provided, that the amount paid by the Company shall not
exceed six times the Maximum Annual Premium. If such
tail prepaid policy has been obtained by the Company
prior to the Closing, the Surviving Corporation shall, and
Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, maintain such
policy in full force and effect, for its full term, and continue
to honor their respective obligations thereunder, and all other
obligations under this Section 6.10(c) shall terminate.
(d) The obligations of Parent and the Surviving Corporation
under this Section 6.10 shall not be terminated or modified
by such parties in a manner so as to adversely affect any
Indemnified Party to whom this Section 6.10 applies without
the consent of the affected Indemnified Party. If Parent or the
Surviving Corporation or any of its respective successors or
assigns (i) shall consolidate with or merge into any other
corporation or entity and shall not be the continuing or
surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger
or (ii) shall transfer all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any individual, corporation or other
entity, then, and in each such case, proper provisions shall be
made so that the successors and assigns of Parent or the
Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, shall assume all of
the obligations set forth in this Section.
(e) The provisions of this Section 6.10 are intended
to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, each of
the Indemnified Parties and their heirs and legal
representatives.
(f) The rights of the Indemnified Parties and their heirs
and legal representatives under this Section 6.10 shall be
in addition to any rights such Indemnified Parties may have
under the certificate of incorporation or by-laws of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, or under any other applicable Laws.
6.11. Takeover
Statutes. If any Takeover Statute becomes applicable to
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, the Company and its Board of Directors shall grant
such approvals and take such actions as are necessary so that
such transactions may be consummated as promptly as practicable
on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and by the Merger
and otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the effects of such
statute or regulation on such transactions.
6.12. Regulatory
Compliance. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries
agrees to use its reasonable best efforts to (a) cure no
later than the Effective Time any material violations and
defaults by any of them under any applicable rules and
regulations of the FCC (the FCC Rules)
and the FAA Rules other than as specified in
Section 6.12(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter,
(b) comply in all material respects with the terms of the
FCC Licenses and the FAA Rules and file or cause to be filed
with the FCC and the FAA all material reports and other filings
to be filed under applicable FCC Rules and FAA Rules and
(c) take all actions reasonably requested in writing by
Parent for each of them to be in compliance effective upon the
consummation of the Closing with the provisions of
Sections 271 and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (including any orders issued by the FCC interpreting or
implementing such provisions). Parent agrees that it shall
reimburse the Company for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by the Company following incurrence and delivery of
reasonable documentation by the Company at the request of Parent
pursuant to clause (c) of this Section 6.12. For
purposes of Section 6.12, the Company and each of its
Subsidiaries shall not be required to cure at the applicable
time any alleged material violation or default with any
applicable rule or regulation of the FCC or the FAA Rules for
any matter that is pending at any of the FCC, the FAA or a court
until such time that there is a final and nonappealable order or
decision holding that the Company or its Subsidiary is in
material violation or default of the applicable rule or
regulation.
6.13. Potential Sale of
Interests. Between the date of this Agreement and the
Effective Time (or earlier termination of this Agreement), to
the extent reasonably requested by Parent, the Company shall, and
A-37
shall cause its Subsidiaries to, cooperate with Parent to
facilitate the disposition immediately prior to, at or after the
Effective Time of those assets or ownership interests held by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (a) that are
identified on Section 6.13 of the Parent Disclosure Letter
or (b) that are identified by Parent in writing to the
Company as assets or ownership interests the holding of which
would be inconsistent with Parents strategic objectives
and the value of which in the aggregate does not exceed
$100,000,000 (such assets or interests described in
clause (a) or (b) referred to as a
Potential Sale Interest). To the
extent reasonably requested by Parent, the Company shall, and
shall cause its Subsidiaries to, use its reasonable best efforts
to (i) permit Persons whom Parent identifies to the Company
as potential purchasers of a Potential Sale Interest to conduct
(and cooperate with such Persons) reasonable
investigations with respect to such Potential Sale Interest
(provided that any such Person executes and delivers to
the Company a confidentiality agreement containing customary
terms), (ii) comply with any applicable right of first
refusal, right of first offer, right of approval or similar
provisions that may be applicable to a proposed transfer of a
Potential Sale Interest, and (iii) deliver such notices,
make such filings and execute such Contracts relating to the
disposition of Potential Sale Interests as reasonably requested
by Parent; provided that neither the Company nor any of
its Subsidiaries shall be required to execute any such Contract
under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may be
required to dispose of any Potential Sale Interest other than
immediately prior to, at or after the Effective Time, or to
agree to restrictions on their businesses or operations prior to
the Effective Time. Parent shall be permitted to identify
potential purchasers of Potential Sale Interests and negotiate
any Contracts with respect to dispositions of Potential Sale
Interests; provided that the Company may (and, to the
extent reasonably requested by Parent, shall) participate in
such negotiations. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
(A) Parent shall reimburse the Company and its Subsidiaries
for their reasonable out-of-pocket costs in complying with this
Section 6.13 promptly following incurrence and delivery of
reasonable documentation of such costs, and (B) the Company
and its Subsidiaries shall not be required to breach the terms
of any Contract with respect to such Potential Sale Interest.
6.14. Transfer Taxes.
Each of Parent, the Company, Merger Sub and the shareholders of
the Company shall pay any sales, use, ad valorem, property,
transfer (including real property transfer) and similar Taxes
imposed on such Person as a result of or in connection with the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby;
provided, however, that the Company shall be
liable for any such Tax that is imposed on its shareholders in
respect of assets that are owned directly or indirectly by the
Company.
6.15. Taxation.
Subject to Section 6.2, neither Parent nor the Company
shall take or cause to be taken any action, whether before or
after the Effective Time, that would disqualify the Merger as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Parent and the Company agree
that if it shall become necessary in order to satisfy the
conditions set forth in Sections 7.2(f) and 7.3(c), the
Merger shall be restructured to include in the Per Share Merger
Consideration the per Share amount of the Special Dividend that
would otherwise be payable as contemplated by Section 6.18.
6.16. Stock Exchange Listing
and De-listing. Parent shall use its reasonable best
efforts to cause the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued
in the Merger to be authorized for listing on the NYSE upon
official notice of issuance, prior to the Closing Date. The
Surviving Corporation shall use its best efforts to cause the
Shares to be no longer listed on the NYSE and de-registered
under the Exchange Act as soon as practicable following the
Effective Time.
6.17. GSA Action. The
Company shall notify Parent promptly if it becomes subject to
any GSA Action with respect to the provision of services by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any United States Federal
Governmental Entity.
6.18. Special
Dividend. Following the date of the adoption of this
Agreement by holders of Shares constituting the Company
Requisite Vote at the Stockholders Meeting and prior to the
Effective Time, the Company shall declare and pay a special
dividend of $1.30 per Share (the Special
Dividend) payable to holders of record of
outstanding Shares as of a record date for the Special Dividend
set by the Board of Directors of the Company, such Special
Dividend to be payable no later than the Effective Time. Subject
to applicable Law, the Company will use its reasonable best
efforts to cause the Special Dividend to be paid prior to the
Effective Time on the Closing Date.
A-38
ARTICLE VII
Conditions
7.1. Conditions to Each
Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger. The
respective obligation of each party to effect the Merger is
subject to the satisfaction or waiver at or prior to the
Effective Time of each of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Shareholder Approval. This Agreement shall have
been duly adopted by holders of Shares constituting the Company
Requisite Vote in accordance with applicable Law and the
Companys certificate of incorporation and by-laws. |
|
|
(b) Regulatory Consents. (i) The waiting period
applicable to the consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act
shall have expired or been earlier terminated, (ii) if
applicable, the European Commission shall have adopted a
decision pursuant to the EC Merger Regulation declaring that the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby are
compatible with the common market (or such compatibility shall
have been deemed to exist under Article 10(6) of the EC
Merger Regulation), or, in the event that the European
Commission adopts a decision pursuant to Article 9(3)(b) of
the EC Merger Regulation (or is deemed to have done so pursuant
to Article 9(5) of the EC Merger Regulation) referring the
review of all or part of the transactions contemplated hereby to
a Governmental Entity of a member state of the European Union,
such Governmental Entity (or any other Governmental Entity of
such member state) shall have granted approval of the
transactions or part thereof that were so referred,
(iii) all approvals and authorizations required to be
obtained in respect of the Communications Licenses for the
consummation of the Merger shall have been obtained,
(iv) all approvals and authorizations required to be
obtained for the consummation of the Merger from the foreign
Governmental Entities set forth on Section 7.1(b)(iv) of
the Parent Disclosure Letter shall have been obtained,
(v) all other Governmental Consents required to be obtained
from any foreign Governmental Entities for the consummation of
the Merger shall have been obtained, except for any failures to
obtain such consents that would not, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Specified
Material Adverse Effect, and (vi) all other Governmental
Consents the failure of which to make or obtain would,
individually or in the aggregate, provide a reasonable basis to
conclude that the Company or its directors or officers would be
subject to the risk of criminal liability, shall have been made
or obtained. For purposes of this Agreement, the term
Governmental Consents shall mean all
notices, reports, filings, consents, registrations, approvals,
permits or authorizations required to be made prior to the
Effective Time by the Company or Parent or any of their
respective Subsidiaries with, or obtained prior to the Effective
Time by the Company or Parent or any of their respective
Subsidiaries from, any Governmental Entity in connection with
the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the
consummation of the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby. |
|
|
(c) Litigation. No Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced
or entered any Law (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent)
that is in effect and restrains, enjoins or otherwise prohibits
consummation of the Merger or the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (collectively, an
Order), except for such Orders of
Governmental Entities outside the United States as would not,
individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have
a Specified Material Adverse Effect and which do not provide a
reasonable basis to conclude that the Company, Parent or their
respective directors or officers would be subject to the risk of
criminal liability. |
|
|
(d) S-4 Registration Statement. The S-4 Registration
Statement shall have become effective under the Securities Act.
No stop order suspending effectiveness of the S-4 Registration
Statement shall have been issued, and no proceedings for that
purpose shall have been initiated or threatened, by the SEC. |
|
|
(e) NYSE Listing. The shares of Parent Common Stock
to be issued in the Merger shall have been authorized for
listing on the NYSE upon official notice of issuance. |
A-39
7.2. Conditions to
Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub. The obligations of
Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger are also subject to
the satisfaction or waiver by Parent at or prior to the
Effective Time of the following conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) Each of
the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in
Sections 5.1(a), 5.1(b) (other than the ninth, tenth (with
respect to Subsidiaries of the Company only) and final sentences
of such Section), 5.1(c), 5.1(d)(ii)(A) (only with respect to
the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of the Company),
the second sentence of Section 5.1(f) and
Section 5.1(m) of this Agreement shall be true and correct
in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as
of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date
(except to the extent any such representation and warranty
expressly speaks as of an earlier date, in which case such
representation and warranty shall be true and correct as of such
earlier date); (ii) any failure of any of the other
representations and warranties of the Company set forth in this
Agreement (without giving effect to any materiality or Material
Adverse Effect qualifications contained therein), individually
or in the aggregate, to be true and correct as of the date of
this Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though made on and
as of the Closing Date (except to the extent any such
representation and warranty expressly speaks as of an earlier
date, in which case such representation and warranty shall be
true and correct as of such earlier date) shall not have had, or
reasonably be expected to have, a Material Adverse Effect; and
(iii) Parent shall have received a certificate signed on
behalf of the Company by the Chief Executive Officer or Chief
Financial Officer of the Company as to the matters set forth in
clauses (i) and (ii) of this Section 7.2(a). |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of the Company. The
Company shall have performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement
at or prior to the Closing Date, and Parent shall have received
a certificate signed on behalf of the Company by the Chief
Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer of the Company to
such effect. |
|
|
(c) Certain Litigation. No Governmental Entity of
competent jurisdiction shall have instituted (or if instituted,
shall not have withdrawn) any proceeding seeking any Order and
no Governmental Entity shall have instituted any civil, criminal
or administrative action, suit, claim, hearing, investigation or
other proceeding the existence of which would, in the reasonable
judgment of Parent, individually or in the aggregate, be
reasonably likely to result in a failure of the condition set
forth in Section 7.1(c). |
|
|
(d) Governmental Consents. All Governmental Consents
(other than those described in Section 7.1(b)(i),
Section 7.1(b)(ii), Section 7.1(b)(iii) and
Section 7.1(b)(iv)) the failure of which to make or obtain
would, individually or in the aggregate, (i) reasonably be
expected to result in a Specified Material Adverse Effect or
(ii) provide a reasonable basis to conclude that Parent or
any of its directors or officers would be subject to the risk of
criminal liability, shall have been made or obtained (such
consents together with those consents that are conditions under
Section 7.1(b)(i), Section 7.1(b)(ii),
Section 7.1(b)(iii) and Section 7.1(b)(iv) hereof
being the Required Governmental
Consents). All Governmental Consents that have
been obtained shall have been obtained without the imposition of
any term, condition or consequence the acceptance of which
would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected
to have or result in a Specified Material Adverse Effect and all
Required Governmental Consents obtained from the FCC shall have
been obtained by Final Order. For the purpose of this Agreement,
Final Order means an action or
decision that has been granted as to which (A) no request
for a stay or any similar request is pending, no stay is in
effect, the action or decision has not been vacated, reversed,
set aside, annulled or suspended and any deadline for filing
such a request that may be designated by statute or regulation
has passed, (B) no petition for rehearing or
reconsideration or application for review is pending and the
time for the filings of any such petition or application has
passed, (C) no Governmental Entity has undertaken to
reconsider the action on its own motion and the time within
which it may effect such reconsideration has passed and
(D) no appeal is pending (including other administrative or
judicial review) or in effect and any deadline for filing any
such appeal that may be specified by statute or rule has passed,
which in any such case (A), (B), (C) or (D) is
reasonably likely to result in vacating, reversing, setting
aside, annulling, suspending or modifying such action or decision |
A-40
|
|
|
(in the case of any modification in a manner that would impose
any term, condition or consequence that would reasonably be
expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect). |
|
|
(e) Consents Under Agreements. The Company shall
have obtained the consent or approval of each Person whose
consent or approval shall be required under any Material
Contract to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, except for those set forth in Section 5.1(d)(ii)
of the Company Disclosure Letter and except where the failure to
obtain such consent or approval, individually or in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to result in a
Material Adverse Effect. |
|
|
(f) Tax Opinion. Parent shall have received the
opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, counsel to Parent,
dated the Closing Date, to the effect that the Merger will be
treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and that
each of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company will be a party to
that reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of
the Code. |
7.3. Conditions to Obligation
of the Company. The obligation of the Company to effect
the Merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by the
Company at or prior to the Effective Time of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) Each of
the representations and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub set
forth in Sections 5.2(a), 5.2(b), 5.2(c), 5.2(d),
5.2(e)(ii)(A) and the second sentence of Section 5.2(i) of
this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing
Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the
extent any such representation and warranty expressly speaks as
of an earlier date, in which case such representation and
warranty shall be true and correct as of such earlier date);
(ii) any failure of any of the other representations and
warranties of Parent and Merger Sub set forth in this Agreement
(without giving effect to any materiality or Material Adverse
Effect qualifications contained therein), individually or in the
aggregate, to be true and correct as of the date of this
Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of
the Closing Date (except to the extent any such representation
and warranty expressly speaks as of an earlier date, in which
case such representation and warranty shall be true and correct
as of such earlier date), shall not have had, or reasonably be
expected to have, a Parent Material Adverse Effect; and
(iii) the Company shall have received a certificate signed
on behalf of Parent and Merger Sub by the Chief Executive
Officer or Chief Financial Officer of Parent as to the matters
set forth in clauses (i) and (ii) of this
Section 7.3(a). |
|
|
(b) Performance of Obligations of Parent and Merger
Sub. Each of Parent and Merger Sub shall have performed in
all material respects all obligations required to be performed
by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and
the Company shall have received a certificate signed on behalf
of Parent and Merger Sub by the Chief Executive Officer or Chief
Financial Officer of Parent to such effect. |
|
|
(c) Tax Opinion. The Company shall have received the
opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, counsel to
the Company, dated the Closing Date, to the effect that the
Merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, and that each of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company will
be a party to that reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(b) of the Code. |
ARTICLE VIII
Termination
8.1. Termination by Mutual
Consent. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger
may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time,
whether before or after the adoption of this Agreement by the
shareholders of the Company referred to in Section 7.1(a),
by mutual written consent of the Company and Parent by action of
their respective Boards of Directors.
A-41
8.2. Termination by Either
Parent or the Company. This Agreement may be terminated
and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the
Effective Time by action of the Board of Directors of either
Parent or the Company if (a) the Merger shall not have been
consummated by January 31, 2006, whether such date is
before or after the date of the adoption of this Agreement by
the shareholders of the Company referred to in
Section 7.1(a), provided, however, that in
the event that, as of January 31, 2006, the conditions set
forth in Section 7.1(b), 7.1(c), 7.2(c) or 7.2(d) have not
been satisfied, the termination date may be extended from time
to time by Parent or the Company one or more times to a date not
beyond July 31, 2006 (such date, including any such
extensions thereof, the Termination
Date), provided, further, that if
the condition set forth in Section 7.2(d) shall not have
been satisfied solely by reason of a Required Governmental
Consent that has been obtained but is not yet a Final Order,
neither party may terminate this Agreement prior to the 60th day
after receipt of such Required Governmental Consent,
(b) the adoption of this Agreement by the shareholders of
the Company referred to in Section 7.1(a) shall not have
been obtained at the Shareholders Meeting or at any adjournment
or postponement thereof or (c) any Order permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting consummation of
the Merger shall become final and non-appealable, except for any
Orders the existence of which would not result in the failure of
the condition set forth in Section 7.1(c) (whether before
or after the adoption of this Agreement by the shareholders of
the Company referred to in Section 7.1(a));
provided, that the right to terminate this Agreement
pursuant to this Section 8.2 shall not be available to any
party that has breached its obligations under this Agreement in
any manner that shall have proximately contributed to the
occurrence of the failure of a condition to the consummation of
the Merger.
8.3. Termination by the
Company. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger
may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time,
whether before or after the adoption of this Agreement by the
shareholders of the Company referred to in Section 7.1(a),
by action of the Board of Directors of the Company if
(i) the Board of Directors of the Company authorizes the
Company, subject to complying with the terms of this Agreement,
to enter into a binding written agreement concerning a
transaction that constitutes a Superior Proposal and the Company
prior to such termination pays to Parent in immediately
available funds the Termination Fee required to be paid pursuant
to Section 8.5(b) or (ii) there has been a breach of
any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement made by
Parent or Merger Sub in this Agreement, or any such
representation or warranty shall have become untrue or incorrect
after the execution of this Agreement, such that
Section 7.3(a) or 7.3(b), as the case may be, would not be
satisfied and such breach or failure to be true and correct is
not curable by the Termination Date.
8.4. Termination by
Parent. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger
may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time,
whether before or after the adoption of this Agreement by the
shareholders of the Company referred to in Section 7.1(a),
by action of the Board of Directors of Parent if (a) the
Board of Directors of the Company shall have withdrawn, modified
or qualified, or shall have agreed to withdraw, modify or
qualify, in fact or in substance, its adoption of this Agreement
or the Directors Recommendation in a manner adverse to
Parent, (b) there has been a breach of any representation,
warranty, covenant or agreement made by the Company in this
Agreement, or any such representation or warranty shall have
become untrue or incorrect after the execution of this
Agreement, such that Section 7.2(a) or 7.2(b), as the case
may be, would not be satisfied and such breach or failure to be
true or correct is not curable by the Termination Date,
(c) by the later of 120 days after the date of this
Agreement or 60 days after effectiveness of the S-4
Registration Statement, the Shareholders Meeting shall not have
been held, or the vote of the Companys shareholders
contemplated by Section 6.4 has not been taken, unless the
Company has used its reasonable best efforts to convene the
Shareholders Meeting and hold such vote by the later of such
dates, or (d) the Company shall have knowingly and
materially and not inadvertently breached any of its obligations
under Section 6.2 of this Agreement.
8.5. Effect of Termination
and Abandonment. (a) In the event of termination of
this Agreement and the abandonment of the Merger pursuant to
this Article VIII, this Agreement (other than as set forth
in Sections 6.12, 6.13 and 9.1) shall become void and of no
effect with no liability on the part of any party hereto (or of
any of its directors, officers or other Representatives);
provided, however, except as otherwise provided
A-42
herein, no such termination shall relieve any party hereto of
any liability or damages resulting from any willful or
intentional breach of any covenant in this Agreement.
|
|
|
(b) In the event that (i) a bona fide Acquisition
Proposal (but substituting 40% for the 15% threshold set forth
in the definition thereof (a Covered
Proposal)) shall have been made to the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries or its shareholders and shall have
become publicly known or any Person shall have publicly
announced an intention (whether or not conditional) to make a
Covered Proposal with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries (and such Covered Proposal or publicly announced
intention shall not have been withdrawn at the time of the
Shareholders Meeting) and thereafter this Agreement is
terminated by either Parent or the Company pursuant to
Section 8.2(b) or by Parent pursuant to
Section 8.4(c), (ii) this Agreement is terminated by
Parent (A) pursuant to Section 8.4(a) and, at the time
of the withdrawal, modification or qualification of the adoption
of this Agreement or the Directors Recommendation (or the
agreement to do so), a Covered Proposal (or any bona fide
indication of interest that is reasonably capable of becoming a
Covered Proposal) shall have been made to the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or its shareholders, directly or indirectly
through any Representatives of the Company, or any Person shall
have publicly announced an intention (whether or not
conditional) to make a Covered Proposal with respect to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (B) pursuant to
Section 8.4(d) or (iii) this Agreement is terminated
by the Company pursuant to clause (i) of Section 8.3,
then the Company shall promptly, but in no event later than two
days after the date of such termination (provided,
however, that the fee to be paid pursuant to
clause (iii) shall be paid as set forth in
Section 8.3), pay Parent a termination fee of $560,000,000
(the Termination Fee) and shall
promptly, but in no event later than two days after being
notified of such by Parent, pay all of the documented
out-of-pocket expenses, including those of the Exchange Agent,
incurred by Parent or Merger Sub in connection with this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement up
to a maximum amount of $40,000,000, in each case payable by wire
transfer of same day funds; provided, however,
that no Termination Fee shall be payable to Parent pursuant to
clause (i) of this paragraph (b) unless and until
(I) any Person (other than Parent) (an
Acquiring Party) has acquired, by
purchase, sale, assignment, lease, transfer or otherwise, in one
transaction or any series of related transactions within
15 months of such termination, a majority of the voting
power of the outstanding securities of the Company or all or
substantially all of the assets of the Company or shall have
entered into an agreement with the Company for such an
acquisition within 15 months of such termination or
(II) there has been consummated a merger, consolidation or
similar business combination between the Company or one of its
Subsidiaries and an Acquiring Party within such 15 month
period. The Company acknowledges that the agreements contained
in this Section 8.5(b) are an integral part of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and that, without
these agreements, Parent and Merger Sub would not enter into
this Agreement; accordingly, if the Company fails to promptly
pay any amount due pursuant to this Section 8.5(b), and, in
order to obtain such payment, Parent or Merger Sub commences a
suit which results in a judgment against the Company for the
fee, charges or expenses to which reference is made in this
paragraph (b), the Company shall pay to Parent or Merger
Sub its costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) in
connection with such suit, together with interest on the amount
of the fee at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. in effect on the
date such payment was required to be made. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the parties hereby
acknowledge that in the event that the Termination Fee and/or
out-of-pocket expenses become payable and are paid by the
Company pursuant to this Section 8.5(b), the Termination
Fee and out-of-pocket expenses shall be Parents and Merger
Subs sole and exclusive remedy for monetary damages under
this Agreement. |
ARTICLE IX
Miscellaneous and
General
9.1. Survival. This
Article IX and the agreements of the Company, Parent and
Merger Sub contained in Article IV and Sections 6.8
(Employee Benefits) and 6.10 (Indemnification; Directors
and Officers Insurance) shall survive the consummation of
the Merger. This Article IX and the agreements of the
Company, Parent and Merger Sub contained in Section 6.9
(Expenses) and Section 8.5 (Effect of
A-43
Termination and Abandonment) and the Confidentiality Agreement
(as defined in Section 9.7) shall survive the termination
of this Agreement. All other representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements in this Agreement shall not survive the
consummation of the Merger or the termination of this Agreement.
9.2. Modification or
Amendment. Subject to the provisions of the applicable
Laws, at any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties
hereto may modify or amend this Agreement, by written agreement
executed and delivered by duly authorized officers of the
respective parties.
9.3. Waiver of
Conditions. The conditions to each of the parties
obligations to consummate the Merger are for the sole benefit of
such party and may be waived by such party in whole or in part
to the extent permitted by applicable Laws.
9.4. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
each such counterpart being deemed to be an original instrument,
and all such counterparts shall together constitute the same
agreement.
9.5. GOVERNING LAW AND
VENUE; WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. (A) THIS AGREEMENT
SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE MADE IN AND IN ALL RESPECTS SHALL BE
INTERPRETED, CONSTRUED AND GOVERNED BY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICTS
OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF. The parties hereby irrevocably
submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New
York and the federal courts of the United States of America
located in the State of New York solely in respect of the
interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of this
Agreement and of the documents referred to in this Agreement,
and in respect of the transactions contemplated hereby, and
hereby waive, and agree not to assert, as a defense in any
action, suit or proceeding for the interpretation or enforcement
hereof or of any such document, that it is not subject thereto
or that such action, suit or proceeding may not be brought or is
not maintainable in said courts or that the venue thereof may
not be appropriate or that this Agreement or any such document
may not be enforced in or by such courts, and the parties hereto
irrevocably agree that all claims with respect to such action or
proceeding shall be heard and determined in such a New York
State or federal court. The parties hereby consent to and grant
any such court jurisdiction over the person of such parties and
consent to the jurisdiction of any such court over the subject
matter of such dispute and agree that mailing of process or
other papers in connection with any such action or proceeding in
the manner provided in Section 9.6 or in such other manner
as may be permitted by Law shall be valid and sufficient service
thereof.
(B) EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY
WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE
COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH SUCH PARTY
HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT SUCH
PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS
AGREEMENT, OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT.
EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT (i) NO
REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS
REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD
NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING
WAIVER, (ii) EACH PARTY UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE
IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (iii) EACH PARTY MAKES THIS
WAIVER VOLUNTARILY, AND (iv) EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO
ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL
WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION 9.5.
A-44
9.6. Notices. Any
notice, request, instruction or other document to be given
hereunder by any party to the others shall be in writing and
delivered personally or sent by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, by facsimile or by overnight courier:
|
|
|
If to Parent or Merger Sub: |
|
|
SBC Communications Inc. |
|
175 East Houston Street |
|
San Antonio, Texas 78205 |
|
Attention: D. Wayne Watts, Esq., Senior Vice President and |
|
Assistant General Counsel |
|
fax: (210) 351-3257 |
|
|
(with a copy to Benjamin F. Stapleton, Esq., |
|
and John J. OBrien, Esq., |
|
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, |
|
125 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004 |
|
fax: (212) 558-3588). |
|
|
If to the Company: |
|
|
AT&T Corp. |
|
One AT&T Way |
|
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 |
|
Attention: Robert Feit, Esq. |
|
fax: (908) 901-4748 |
|
|
(with a copy to Steven A. Rosenblum, Esq. |
|
and Stephanie J. Seligman, Esq., |
|
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, |
|
51 West 52nd Street, New York, NY 10019 |
|
fax: (212) 403-2000). |
or to such other persons or addresses as may be designated in
writing by the party to receive such notice as provided above.
Any notice, request, instruction or other document given as
provided above shall be deemed given to the receiving party upon
actual receipt, if delivered personally; three business days
after deposit in the mail, if sent by registered or certified
mail; upon confirmation of successful transmission if sent by
facsimile (provided that if given by facsimile such notice,
request, instruction or other document shall be followed up
within one business day by dispatch pursuant to one of the other
methods described herein); or on the next business day after
deposit with an overnight courier, if sent by an overnight
courier.
9.7. Entire
Agreement. This Agreement (including any exhibits
hereto), the Company Disclosure Letter, the Parent Disclosure
Letter and the Non-Disclosure Agreement, dated January 25,
2005, between Parent and the Company (the
Confidentiality Agreement) constitute
the entire agreement, and supersede all other prior agreements,
understandings, representations and warranties both written and
oral, among the parties, with respect to the subject matter
hereof.
9.8. Third Party
Beneficiaries. Except as provided in Section 6.10
(Indemnification; Directors and Officers Insurance),
this Agreement is not intended to, and does not, confer upon any
Person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies
hereunder; provided, however, that the
shareholders of the Company shall be deemed third party
beneficiaries solely with respect to the right to receive the
Per Share Merger Consideration pursuant to Article IV
hereof.
9.9. Obligations of Parent
and of the Company. Whenever this Agreement requires a
Subsidiary of Parent to take any action, such requirement shall
be deemed to include an undertaking on the part of Parent to
cause such Subsidiary to take such action. Whenever this
Agreement requires a Subsidiary of the Company to take any
action, such requirement shall be deemed to include an
undertaking on the part of the Company to
A-45
cause such Subsidiary to take such action and, after the
Effective Time, on the part of the Surviving Corporation to
cause such Subsidiary to take such action.
9.10. Definitions.
Each of the terms set forth in Annex A is defined in the
Section of this Agreement set forth opposite such term.
9.11. Severability.
The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and
the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions
hereof. If any provision of this Agreement, or the application
thereof to any Person or any circumstance, is invalid or
unenforceable, (a) a suitable and equitable provision shall
be substituted therefor in order to carry out, so far as may be
valid and enforceable, the intent and purpose of such invalid or
unenforceable provision and (b) the remainder of this
Agreement and the application of such provision to other Persons
or circumstances shall not be affected by such invalidity or
unenforceability, nor shall such invalidity or unenforceability
affect the validity or enforceability of such provision, or the
application thereof, in any other jurisdiction.
9.12. Interpretation;
Construction. (a) The table of contents and
headings herein are for convenience of reference only, do not
constitute part of this Agreement and shall not be deemed to
limit or otherwise affect any of the provisions hereof. Where a
reference in this Agreement is made to a Section or Exhibit,
such reference shall be to a Section of or Exhibit to this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation.
(b) The parties have participated jointly in negotiating
and drafting this Agreement. In the event that an ambiguity or a
question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement
shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties, and no
presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or
disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any
provision of this Agreement.
(c) Each of the Company and Parent has or may have set
forth information in its respective disclosure letter in a
section thereof that corresponds to the section of this
Agreement to which it relates. A matter set forth in one section
of a disclosure letter need not be set forth in any other
section of the disclosure letter so long as its relevance to the
latter section of the disclosure letter or section of the
Agreement is readily apparent on the face of the information
disclosed in the disclosure letter to the Person to which such
disclosure is being made. The fact that any item of information
is disclosed in a disclosure letter to this Agreement shall not
be construed to mean that such information is required to be
disclosed by this Agreement. Such information and the dollar
thresholds set forth herein shall not be used as a basis for
interpreting the terms material, Material
Adverse Effect, Parent Material Adverse Effect
or other similar terms in this Agreement.
9.13. Assignment.
This Agreement shall not be assignable by operation of law or
otherwise; provided, however, that Parent may
designate, by written notice to the Company, another
wholly-owned direct or indirect subsidiary to be a Constituent
Corporation in lieu of Merger Sub, in which event all references
herein to Merger Sub shall be deemed references to such other
subsidiary, except that all representations and warranties made
herein with respect to Merger Sub as of the date of this
Agreement shall be deemed representations and warranties made
with respect to such other subsidiary as of the date of such
designation; provided that any such designation shall not
relieve Parent or Merger Sub of any of its obligations hereunder
or materially impede or delay the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise
materially impede the rights of the shareholders of the Company
under this Agreement. Any purported assignment in violation of
this Agreement will be void ab initio.
A-46
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and
delivered by the duly authorized officers of the parties hereto
as of the date first written above.
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Edward E.
Whitacre, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Edward E.
Whitacre, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Tau Merger SUB Corporation
|
A-47
ANNEX A
DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
Terms |
|
Section |
|
|
|
Acquiring Party
|
|
8.5(b) |
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
6.2 |
Affected Employees
|
|
6.8 |
Affiliate
|
|
5.1(b) |
Agreement
|
|
Preamble |
Audit Date
|
|
5.1(e) |
Bankruptcy and Equity Exception
|
|
5.1(c) |
By-Laws
|
|
2.2 |
CERCLA
|
|
5.1(n) |
Certificate
|
|
4.1(a) |
Charter
|
|
2.1 |
Closing
|
|
1.2 |
Closing Date
|
|
1.2 |
Code
|
|
Recitals |
Communications Licenses
|
|
5.1(i)(ii) |
Company
|
|
Preamble |
Company Awards
|
|
4.5(b) |
Company Disclosure Letter
|
|
5.1 |
Company Licenses
|
|
6.1(ii) |
Company Option
|
|
4.5(a) |
Company Preferred Shares
|
|
5.1(b) |
Company Reports
|
|
5.1(e) |
Company Requisite Vote
|
|
5.1(c) |
Company Severance Plans
|
|
6.8 |
Company Stock Agreements
|
|
4.5(a) |
Company Stock Plans
|
|
4.5(a) |
Compensation and Benefit Plans
|
|
5.1(h)(i) |
Computer Software
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(1) |
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
9.7 |
Constituent Corporations
|
|
Preamble |
Contract
|
|
5.1(d)(ii) |
Copyrights
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(2) |
Costs
|
|
6.10 |
Covered Proposal
|
|
8.5(b) |
Director Designees
|
|
3.3 |
Directors Recommendation
|
|
5.1(c)(ii) |
D&O Insurance
|
|
6.10(c) |
EC Merger Regulation
|
|
5.1(d) |
Effective Time
|
|
1.3 |
Encumbrance
|
|
5.1(k)(iii) |
Environmental Laws
|
|
5.1(n) |
Environmental Liability
|
|
5.1(n) |
A-A-1
|
|
|
Terms |
|
Section |
|
|
|
ERISA
|
|
5.1(h)(i) |
ERISA Affiliate
|
|
5.1(h)(iii) |
Exchange Act
|
|
5.1(b) |
Exchange Agent
|
|
4.2(a) |
Exchange Fund
|
|
4.2(a) |
Exchange Ratio
|
|
4.1(a) |
Excluded Share
|
|
4.1(a) |
Excluded Shares
|
|
4.1(a) |
FAA
|
|
5.1(i)(ii) |
FAA Rules
|
|
5.1(i)(iv) |
FCC
|
|
5.1(d) |
FCC Licenses
|
|
6.1(ii) |
FCC Rules
|
|
6.12 |
Final Order
|
|
7.2(d) |
Foreign Licenses
|
|
6.1(ii) |
GAAP
|
|
5.1(e)(ii) |
Governmental Consents
|
|
7.1(b) |
Governmental Entity
|
|
5.1(d) |
GSA Action
|
|
6.17 |
Hazardous Substance
|
|
5.1(n) |
HSR Act
|
|
5.1(b) |
Indemnified Parties
|
|
6.10 |
Intellectual Property
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(2) |
IRS
|
|
5.1(h)(ii) |
IT Assets
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(3) |
Laws
|
|
5.1(i) |
Leased Real Property
|
|
5.1(k)(ii) |
Licenses
|
|
5.1(i) |
Lien
|
|
5.1(b) |
Local Licenses
|
|
6.1(ii) |
Long Term Incentive Program
|
|
6.1(i)(s) |
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
5.1(a) |
Material Contracts
|
|
5.1(j)(i)(I) |
Maximum Annual Premium
|
|
6.10(c) |
Merger
|
|
Recitals |
Merger Sub
|
|
Preamble |
New Parent Preferred Shares
|
|
4.1(a)(ii) |
New Plans
|
|
6.8(b) |
New York Certificate of Merger
|
|
1.3 |
Notice of Superior Proposal
|
|
6.2 |
NYBCL
|
|
1.1 |
NYSE
|
|
4.2(e) |
Order
|
|
7.1(c) |
Outstanding Share
|
|
4.1(a) |
A-A-2
|
|
|
Terms |
|
Section |
|
|
|
Outstanding Shares
|
|
4.1(a) |
Owned Real Property
|
|
5.1(k) |
Parent
|
|
Preamble |
Parent Audit Date
|
|
5.2(f) |
Parent Common Stock
|
|
4.1(a) |
Parent Disclosure Letter
|
|
5.2 |
Parent Material Adverse Effect
|
|
5.2(a) |
Parent Preferred Shares
|
|
5.2(b) |
Parent Reports
|
|
5.2(f) |
Parent Stock Plans
|
|
5.2(b) |
Patents
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(2) |
Pension Plan
|
|
5.1(h)(ii) |
Per Share Merger Consideration
|
|
4.1(a) |
Person
|
|
4.2(b) |
Potential Sale Interest
|
|
6.13 |
Prior Plan
|
|
6.8(b) |
Prospectus/Proxy Statement
|
|
6.3 |
RCRA
|
|
5.1(n) |
Release
|
|
5.1(n) |
Removal, Remedial and Response
|
|
5.1(n) |
Representatives
|
|
6.2 |
Required Governmental Consents
|
|
7.2(d) |
Right-of-Way Agreement
|
|
5.1(l) |
S-4 Registration Statement
|
|
6.3 |
SEC
|
|
4.5(c) |
Section 16 Officers
|
|
5.1(f)(ix) |
Securities Act
|
|
4.5(c) |
Share
|
|
4.1(a) |
Shareholders Meeting
|
|
6.4 |
Shares
|
|
4.1(a) |
SOX Act
|
|
5.1(e) |
Special Dividend
|
|
6.18 |
Specified Material Adverse Effect
|
|
6.5(b) |
State Commissions
|
|
5.1(d) |
State Licenses
|
|
6.1(ii) |
Subsidiary
|
|
5.1(a) |
Subsidiary Preferred Shares
|
|
5.1(b) |
Substitute Preferred Shares
|
|
6.4(b) |
Successor Plan
|
|
6.8(b) |
Superior Proposal
|
|
6.2 |
Surviving Corporation
|
|
1.1 |
Takeover Statute
|
|
5.1(m) |
Tax
|
|
5.1(o) |
Tax Return
|
|
5.1(o) |
A-A-3
|
|
|
Terms |
|
Section |
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
5.1(o) |
Termination Date
|
|
8.2 |
Termination Fee
|
|
8.5(b) |
Trade Secrets
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(2) |
Trademarks
|
|
5.1(q)(vi)(2) |
A-A-4
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
[AT&T CORP.]
Under Section 402 of the Business Corporation Law
THE UNDERSIGNED, a natural person of at least eighteen years of
age, for the purpose of forming a corporation pursuant to
Section 402 of the Business Corporation Law of the State of
New York, hereby certifies as follows:
FIRST. The name of the Corporation is [AT&T Corp.].
SECOND. The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any
lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized
under the Business Corporation Law of the State of New York (the
Business Corporation Law) but not to engage in any
act or activity requiring the consent or approval of any New
York State official, department, board, agency or other body
without such consent or approval first being obtained.
THIRD. The office of the Corporation within the State of New
York is to be located in the County of New York.
FOURTH. The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation
shall have authority to issue is 1,000 shares of Common
Stock, par value of $.01 per share.
FIFTH. The Secretary of State of the State of New York is
designated as agent of the Corporation upon whom process in any
action or proceeding against it may be served. The address to
which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of any process
against the Corporation served upon him is: c/o Corporation
Service Company, 80 State Street, Albany, New York 12207-2543.
SIXTH. By-laws of the Corporation may be adopted, amended or
repealed by the board of directors of the Corporation by the
vote of a majority of the directors present at a meeting of the
Board at which a quorum is present.
SEVENTH. No holder of shares of the Corporation of any class,
now or hereafter authorized, shall have any preferential or
preemptive right to subscribe for, purchase or receive any
shares of the Corporation of any class, now or hereafter
authorized, or any options or warrants for such shares, or any
rights to subscribe for or purchase such shares, or any
securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares,
which may at any time be issued, sold or offered for sale by the
Corporation.
EIGHTH. Whenever under the provisions of the Business
Corporation Law shareholders are required or permitted to take
any action by vote, such action may be taken without a meeting
on written consent, signed by the holders of outstanding shares
having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which
all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 615 of the
Business Corporation Law.
NINTH. The Corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by
Article 7 of the Business Corporation Law, as the same may
be amended and supplemented, indemnify any and all persons whom
it shall have power to indemnify under said Article from and
against any and all of the expenses, liabilities, or other
matters referred to in or covered by said Article, and the
indemnification provided for herein shall not be deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which any person may be
entitled under any by-law, resolution of shareholders,
resolution of directors, agreement, or otherwise, as permitted
by said Article, as to action in any capacity in which he or she
served at the request of the Corporation.
TENTH. A director of the Corporation shall not be personally
liable to the Corporation or its shareholders for damages for
any breach of duty as a director, except to the extent that such
exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted
under the Business Corporation Law as currently in effect or as
the same may hereafter be amended. No amendment, modification or
repeal of this Article TENTH shall adversely affect any
right or protection of a director that exists at the time of
such amendment, modification or repeal.
A-E-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed and affirm as true under
the penalties of perjury this certificate
this day
of ,
200 .
A-E-2
ANNEX B
CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON LLC
January 30, 2005
Board of Directors
AT&T Corp.
900 Route 202/206 North
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921
Members of the Board:
You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of common stock,
par value $1.00 per share (Company Common
Stock), of AT&T Corp. (the Company) of the
Exchange Ratio set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of January 30, 2005 (the Merger
Agreement), among the Company, SBC Communications Inc.
(the Acquiror) and Tau Merger Sub Corporation, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiror (the Sub).
The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the
merger (the Merger) of the Company with the Sub
pursuant to which the Company will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Acquiror and each outstanding share of Company
Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive
0.77942 shares, par value $1.00 per share
(Acquiror Common Stock), of the Acquiror (the
Exchange Ratio). For purposes of our analyses we
have, with your consent, assumed that in accordance with the
terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company will declare a $1.30
special cash dividend per share of Company Common Stock payable
to the holders of Company Common Stock as of immediately prior
to the consummation of the Merger.
In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed the Merger
Agreement and certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to the Company and the Acquiror. We have
also reviewed certain other information relating to the Company
and the Acquiror, including financial forecasts for 2005
prepared and provided to us by the Company, financial forecasts
for 2005 through 2007 prepared and provided to us by the
Acquiror and certain publicly available research analyst
estimates concerning the Company and the Acquiror, and have met
with the managements of the Company and the Acquiror to discuss
the business and prospects of the Company and the Acquiror,
respectively. We have also considered certain financial and
stock market data of the Company and the Acquiror, and we have
compared that data with similar data for other publicly held
companies in businesses we deemed similar to those of the
Company and the Acquiror and we have considered, to the extent
publicly available, the financial terms of certain other
business combinations and other transactions which have recently
been effected or announced. We also considered such other
information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and
financial, economic and market criteria which we deemed relevant.
In connection with our review, we have not assumed any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
foregoing information and have relied on its being complete and
accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial
forecasts of the Company for 2005 prepared by the management of
the Company, we have discussed such forecasts with the
management of the Company and we have been advised by them, and
we have assumed, that such forecasts represent the best
currently available estimates and judgments of the management of
the Company as to the future financial performance of the
Company. With respect to the publicly available research analyst
estimates concerning the Company for 2006 through 2009 that we
reviewed and discussed with the Company, the management of the
Company has advised us, and we have assumed, that such estimates
represent reasonable estimates and judgments as to the future
financial performance of the Company. With respect to the
publicly available research analyst estimates concerning the
Acquiror for 2005 through 2007 reviewed by us, we have, with
your consent and based upon our comparison of such estimates to
financial forecasts for such years prepared by and discussed
with the management of the Acquiror, assumed that such analyst
estimates represent reasonable estimates and judgments as to the
future financial performance of the Acquiror. With respect to
the estimates as to the cost savings and other potential
synergies
B-1
anticipated to result from the Merger reviewed and discussed by
the managements of the Company and the Acquiror, we have been
advised and have assumed that such estimates (including the
aggregate amount, timing and achievability thereof) represent
reasonable estimates and judgments. We have assumed, with your
consent, that the Merger will be treated as a tax-free
reorganization for federal income tax purposes. We also have
assumed, with your consent, that, in the course of obtaining any
regulatory or third party consents, approvals or agreements in
connection with the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or
condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on
the Company, the Acquiror or the contemplated benefits of the
Merger and that the Merger will be consummated in accordance
with the terms of the Merger Agreement without waiver,
modification or amendment of any material term, condition or
agreement thereof. In addition, we have not been requested to
make, and have not made, an independent evaluation or appraisal
of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the
Company or the Acquiror, nor have we been furnished with any
such evaluations or appraisals. Our opinion addresses only the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of
Company Common Stock of the Exchange Ratio and does not address
any other aspect or implication of the Merger or any other
agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in
connection with the Merger or otherwise. Our opinion is
necessarily based upon information made available to us as of
the date hereof and financial, economic, market and other
conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date
hereof. We are not expressing any opinion as to what the value
of shares of Acquiror Common Stock actually will be when issued
to the holders of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger or
the prices at which shares of Acquiror Common Stock will trade
at any time. Our opinion does not address the relative merits of
the Merger as compared to alternative transactions or strategies
that might be available to the Company, nor does it address the
underlying business decision of the Company to proceed with the
Merger.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors in
connection with the Merger and will receive a fee for our
services, a significant portion of which is contingent upon the
consummation of the Merger. In addition, the Company has agreed
to indemnify us for certain liabilities and other matters
arising out of our engagement. From time to time, we and our
affiliates have in the past provided and in the future we may
provide, investment banking and other financial services to the
Company and the Acquiror, for which we have received, and would
expect to receive, compensation. CSFB is a full service
securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage
activities as well as providing investment banking and other
financial services. In the ordinary course of business, CSFB and
its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for their own accounts
and the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities
and financial instruments (including bank loans and other
obligations) of the Company, the Acquiror and any other company
that may be involved in the Merger, as well as provide
investment banking and other financial services to such
companies.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its
consideration of the Merger and does not constitute a
recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act on any matter relating to the proposed Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that,
as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Company Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
/s/ |
CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON LLC |
B-2
ANNEX C
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
January 30, 2005
Board of Directors
AT&T Corp.
900 Route 202/206 North
Bedminster, New Jersey 07921
Members of the Board:
We understand that AT&T Corp. (the Company), SBC
Communications Inc. (Buyer) and Tau Merger Sub
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Buyer
(Acquisition Sub) propose to enter into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger, substantially in the form of the draft dated
January 30, 2005 (the Merger Agreement), which
provides, among other things, for the merger (the
Merger) of Acquisition Sub with and into the
Company. Pursuant to the Merger, the Company will become a
wholly owned subsidiary of Buyer and each outstanding share of
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Common
Stock), of the Company, other than shares held in treasury
or any affiliate of the Company or held by Buyer or any
affiliate of Buyer, will be converted into the right to receive
0.77942 common shares, par value $1.00 per share (the
Buyer Common Stock), of Buyer (the Stock
Consideration). The Merger Agreement also contemplates the
payment by the Company of a special dividend of $1.30 per
share (the Special Dividend) to holders of Common
Stock (the Special Dividend, together with the Stock
Consideration, being the Consideration). For
purposes of this opinion, we have assumed, with your consent,
that the Special Dividend will be paid to holders of the Common
Stock at the effective time of the Merger. The terms and
conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Merger
Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Consideration
to be received by the holders of shares of Common Stock in
accordance with the Merger Agreement is fair from a financial
point of view to such holders other than Buyer and its
affiliates.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
|
|
|
|
i) |
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other information of the Company and of Buyer; |
|
|
ii) |
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning the Company prepared by
the management of the Company; |
|
|
iii) |
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Company with senior
executives of the Company; |
|
|
iv) |
reviewed certain financial projections for 2005 prepared by the
management of the Company and reviewed certain public research
reports concerning the Company prepared by certain equity
research analysts and discussed with senior executives of the
Company such financial projections and research reports
(including the financial projections contained therein) and
certain estimates, prepared by the management of the Company, as
to the cost savings and other potential synergies (including the
amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated to result
from the Merger; |
|
|
v) |
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Buyer prepared by the
management of Buyer; |
|
|
vi) |
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Buyer with senior executives of
Buyer; |
C-1
|
|
|
|
vii) |
reviewed certain financial projections for 2005 through 2007
prepared by the management of Buyer and reviewed certain public
research reports concerning Buyer prepared by certain equity
research analysts; |
|
|
viii) |
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for the Common
Stock and the Buyer Common Stock; |
|
|
ix) |
compared the financial performance of the Company and of Buyer
and the prices and trading activity of the Common Stock and the
Buyer Common Stock with that of certain other comparable
publicly-traded companies and their securities; |
|
|
x) |
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions; |
|
|
xi) |
discussed with the managements of the Company and of Buyer
information regarding certain strategic, financial and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the Merger; |
|
|
xii) |
reviewed the Merger Agreement and certain related
documents; and |
|
|
xiii) |
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as we have deemed appropriate. |
We have assumed and relied upon without independent verification
the accuracy and completeness of the information reviewed by us
for the purposes of this opinion. With respect to the financial
projections of the Company for 2005 and the estimates of cost
savings and synergies prepared by the management of the Company,
we have discussed such projections and estimates with the
management of the Company and we have been advised by them, and
we have assumed, with your consent, that such projections
represent the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the management of the Company as to the future financial
performance of the Company. With respect to the financial
projections concerning the Company contained in certain publicly
available equity analyst research reports (including adjustments
thereto) that we discussed with the Company, the management of
the Company has advised us, and we have assumed, with your
consent, that such projections represent reasonable estimates
and judgments as to the future financial performance of the
Company. With respect to publicly available research analyst
estimates concerning Buyer for 2005 through 2007, based upon our
comparison of such estimates to financial forecasts of the
management of Buyer for such years and discussions of such
management forecasts with the management of Buyer, we have
assumed that such analyst estimates represent reasonable
estimates and judgments as to the future financial performance
of Buyer. We have also assumed, with your consent, without
independent verification that the information regarding certain
strategic, financial and operational benefits anticipated to
result from the Merger represent reasonable estimates and
judgments of the managements of the Company and Buyer. We have
assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be consummated
in accordance with the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement
without material modification, waiver or delay, including, among
other things, that the Merger will be treated as a tax-free
reorganization pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. In connection with the receipt of all the necessary
regulatory or other third party approvals for the Merger, we
have assumed, with your consent, that no restrictions will be
imposed that would have a material adverse effect on the
contemplated benefits expected to be derived in the Merger. We
have not made any independent valuation or appraisal of the
assets or liabilities of the Company or Buyer, nor have we been
furnished with any such valuations or appraisals. Our opinion is
necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after the date
hereof could materially affect this opinion. We have not
undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this opinion
or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof.
In arriving at our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit,
and we did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to
any acquisition, business combination or other extraordinary
transaction involving the Company. This opinion does not address
the underlying business decision by the Company to enter into
the Merger Agreement or the relative merits of the Merger
compared to other alternatives available to the Company, whether
such alternatives exist.
C-2
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
the Company in connection with this transaction and will receive
a fee for our services, a substantial portion of which is
contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. In the past,
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (Morgan
Stanley) and its affiliates have provided financial
advisory and financing services for the Company and Buyer and
have received fees for the rendering of these services. In the
ordinary course of our trading, brokerage, investment banking,
investment management, financing and principal investing
activities, Morgan Stanley or its affiliates may at any time
hold long or short positions, and may trade or otherwise effect
transactions, for our own account or the accounts of customers,
in debt or equity securities of the Company or Buyer.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of the Company and may not be used for any
other purpose without our prior written consent, except that
this opinion may be included in its entirety in any filing made
by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission with
respect to the Merger and the transactions related thereto. In
addition, this opinion does not in any manner address the prices
at which the Buyer Common Stock will trade following the
consummation of the Merger or at any other time, and Morgan
Stanley expresses no opinion or recommendation as to how the
shareholders of the Company should vote at the shareholder
meeting held in connection with the Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
on the date hereof that the Consideration to be received by the
holders of shares of Common Stock in accordance with the Merger
Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such holders
other than Buyer and its affiliates.
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul J. Taubman |
|
Managing Director |
C-3
ANNEX D
AT&T CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
The Board of Directors of AT&T Corp. has adopted the
following guidelines to reflect the principles by which the
Company operates. The Board will review these guidelines from
time to time and make such changes as it deems necessary and
appropriate.
Board of Director Responsibility
|
|
1. |
Role of the Board of Directors |
The Board of Directors is elected by shareholders to provide
oversight and strategic guidance to senior management. The core
responsibility of the Board of Directors is to exercise their
fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the Company and
its shareholders. In discharging that obligation, the directors
should be entitled to rely on the honesty and integrity of the
Companys senior management and its outside advisors and
auditors. The Board selects and oversees the members of senior
management, to whom the Board delegates the authority and
responsibility for the conduct of the day-to-day operations of
the business.
Directors are expected to attend Board meetings and meetings of
committees on which they serve, as well as the Companys
annual meeting of shareholders, to ask questions and engage in
discussion, and to spend the time needed and meet as frequently
as necessary to properly discharge their responsibilities.
Each member of the Board of Directors shall at all times exhibit
high standards of integrity and ethical behavior. Each director
shall adhere to the applicable Company policies concerning
integrity and ethical behavior which the Companys
management and employees are subject, including the AT&T
Code of Conduct and its policies on competition and insider
trading. Directors shall promptly notify the CEO and Corporate
Secretary if any actual or potential conflict of interest arises
between the director and the Company. If a significant conflict
exists and can not be resolved, the director should resign.
Directors will recuse themselves from any Board discussion or
decision affecting their personal, business or professional
interests. The Audit Committee will consider, and the Board will
resolve, any conflicts of interest or code of conduct questions
concerning directors or senior management, and the CEO will
resolve any such questions involving any other officer of the
Company. The Governance and Nominating Committee shall consider
issues involving possible conflicts of interests of directors.
Board of Director Composition
|
|
3. |
Selection of Board Members |
All Board members are elected each year by the Companys
shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders. The Board
recommends to the shareholders a slate of nominees for election
at the annual meeting. Between annual meetings of shareholders,
the board may elect directors to serve until the next annual
meeting. Nominees for directorship will be selected by the
Governance and Nominating Committee, in accordance with the
policies and principles in its charter, and nominated for
election by the Board. The Chairman of the Board should extend
the Boards invitation to join the Board.
|
|
4. |
Board Membership Criteria |
The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for
reviewing with the Board, on an annual basis, the requisite
skills and characteristics of individual Board members, as well
as the composition of the Board as a whole, in the context of
the needs of the Company. The Governance and Nominating
Committee will review all nominees for director in accordance
with its charter and select those nominees whose attributes it
believes would be most beneficial to the Company. This
assessment will include such issues as experience, integrity,
competence, diversity, skills, and dedication in the context of
the needs of the Board.
D-1
The Board presently has 10 members. The Companys by-laws
permit the Board to vary in size from 9 to 25. The Board
periodically reviews the appropriate size of the Board, which
may vary to accommodate the availability of suitable candidates.
|
|
6. |
Directors with Job Changes |
The Board believes that directors who retire from their present
employment, or materially change their position, should
volunteer to resign from the Board concurrent with the next
annual meeting of shareholders. The Board, through the
Governance and Nominating Committee, would then evaluate whether
the Board should accept the resignation or whether the director
should be renominated based on an assessment of whether the
director continued to meet the Boards membership criteria
under the circumstances.
The Board does not believe it should limit the number of terms
for which an individual may serve as a director. Directors who
have served on the board for an extended period of time are able
to provide valuable insight into the Companys operations
and prospects based on their experience with the and
understanding of the Companys history, policies and
objectives. The Board believes that it can obtain new ideas and
viewpoints through the application of the nominating process
described above.
The Board does not believe that its members should be prohibited
from serving on the Boards of other companies so long as those
commitments do not create material actual or potential conflicts
and do not interfere with the directors ability to fulfill
his or her duties as a member of the Board. The Governance and
Nominating Committee will take into account the nature and time
involved in the directors service on other boards in
assessing director nominees. Directors should advise the
Chairman of the Board, the Chairman of the Governance and
Nominating Committee and the Corporate Secretary in advance of
accepting an invitation to serve on another public company board.
No director may be nominated to a new term if he or she would be
age 70 or older at the time of the election. A retiring or
resigning CEO of the Company or other management director shall
generally not continue to serve as a Board member.
|
|
10. |
Director Independence |
At least three quarters of the Board will at all times be
comprised of directors who meet the criteria for independence
required by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and
Exchange Commission. It is the objective of the Board that all
non-management directors be independent directors. Under
proposed New York Stock Exchange rules, the Board must determine
that a director does not have any material relationship with the
Company. The proposed NYSE rules also provide that a director
shall be considered independent if: (1) the director has no
material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a
partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with the Company; (2) the director, and each
of the directors immediate family members, is not and has
not been during the last five years employed by the Company;
(3) the director has not received any compensation in
excess of $100,000 annually from the Company in any capacity
other than as a director, and none of the directors
immediate family members has received more than $100,000
annually in compensation from the Company, in any of the last
five years; (4) the director, and each of the
directors immediate family members, is not and has not
been during the last five years affiliated with or employed by a
present or former auditor (or an affiliate of such auditor) of
the Company; (5) the director, and each of the
directors immediate family members, is not employed as an
executive officer of another company where any of the
Companys listed executive officers serves on such other
companys compensation committee; and (6) the director
is not and has not been during the last five years employed by,
D-2
and each of the directors immediate family members is not
and has not been during the last five years an executive officer
of, another company (a) that accounts for the greater of 2%
or $1 million of the Companys revenues or
(b) for which the Company accounts for the greater of 2% or
$1 million of such other companys consolidated gross
revenues. Under proposed Securities and Exchange Commission
rules a director who is a member of the Audit Committee shall
not be considered independent if he or she is affiliated with
the Company or if he, she or any member of his or her immediate
family, or any law firm, accounting firm, consulting firm,
investment bank or similar entity with which any of them are
affiliated, has accepted any consulting, advisory or other
compensatory fee from the Company or an affiliate, other than
for service on the Board or a committee. The Company will not
consider as independent any director who is employed by a non-
profit organization, a substantial portion of whose funding
comes from the Company. The Board will from time to time and no
less often than annually make a determination as to which
members are independent under applicable requirements.
The Companys by-laws provide that the Companys Chief
Executive Officer shall also serve as the Companys
Chairman of the Board. The Board believes this policy has served
it well in the past and continues to serve it well at present.
Conduct of Board Meetings
|
|
12. |
Board Meeting Schedule and Agenda |
At the beginning of the year the Chairman will establish a
schedule and agenda of subjects to be discussed during the year
(to the degree this can be foreseen). The Board of Directors
shall have at least six regularly scheduled meetings each year.
Additional unscheduled Board meetings may be called upon
appropriate notice at any time to address specific needs of the
business. The Chairman will establish the agenda for each Board
meeting. Each Board member is encouraged to suggest the
inclusion of items on the agenda at any time. The Board will
review the Companys long-term strategic plan and the
principal issues facing the Company during at least one meeting
each year. The CEO and Corporate Secretary shall attend all
non-executive sessions of the Board, and other members of
management may attend non-executive sessions of the Board at the
invitation of the CEO or the Board.
|
|
13. |
Advance Distribution of Materials |
Information and data that are important to the Boards
understanding of the business to be conducted at a Board or
committee meeting should generally be distributed in writing to
the directors before the meeting. Directors should review these
materials in advance of the meeting to preserve time at the
meeting and to provoke questions and discussion about the
material. On certain occasions where the subject matter is too
sensitive to put in writing, the matter will be discussed at the
meeting.
The non-management directors of the Board will meet in executive
session at least quarterly. Executive session discussions may
include such topics as the non-management directors determine,
but actions of the Board should be taken separately at a Board
meeting. The chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee
shall serve as chairman for any executive session of the Board.
Committees of the Board
The Board will have at all times an Audit Committee, a
Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee and a Governance
and Nominating Committee. All of the members of these committees
will be independent directors. The Board may have additional
committees as it determines from time to time are necessary or
appropriate.
D-3
Committee members will be appointed by the Board upon
recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee after
taking into account the desires, experiences and expertise of
individual directors. The Board believes that consideration
should be given to rotating committee members periodically, but
the Board does not believe that rotation should be mandated as a
policy.
Each committee will have its own charter. The charters will set
forth the purposes, goals and responsibilities of the committees
as well as qualifications for committee membership, procedures
for committee member appointment and removal, committee
structure and operations and committee reporting to the Board.
The charters will also provide that each committee will annually
evaluate its performance.
The Chairman of each committee, in consultation with the
committee members, will determine the frequency and length of
the committee meetings consistent with any requirements set
forth in the committees charter. The Chairman of each
committee, in consultation with the appropriate members of the
committee and management, will develop the committees
agenda.
Director Communications
|
|
19. |
Director Access to Officers and Employees |
Directors have full and free access to officers and employees of
the Company. Any meetings or contacts that a director wishes to
initiate may be arranged through the CEO or the Corporate
Secretary or directly by the director. Any such contact should
be done in a way that is not disruptive to the business
operations of the Company. Any non-routine written
communications between a director and an officer or employee of
the Company should be copied to the CEO. The Corporate Secretary
advises the Board on appropriate procedures for the conduct of
meetings and on corporate governance matters, and all Board
members shall have access to his advice and services.
|
|
20. |
Director Access to Outside Advisors |
The Board and each committee have the power to hire independent
legal, financial or other advisors as they may deem necessary,
without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of
the Company in advance.
|
|
21. |
Boards Interaction with Third Parties |
The Board believes that the management speaks for the Company.
At the request of management, individual Board members may, from
time to time, meet or otherwise communicate with various
constituencies that are involved with the Company. If comments
are appropriate, they should in most circumstances come from the
Chairman of the Board.
|
|
22. |
Director Orientation and Continuing Education |
All new directors must participate in the Companys
Orientation Program, which should be conducted once each year
following the annual meeting at which new directors are elected.
This orientation will include presentations by senior management
to familiarize new directors with the Companys strategic
plans, its significant financial, accounting and risk management
issues, its compliance programs, its Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, its principal officers, and its internal and
independent auditors. All other directors are also invited to
attend the Orientation Program.
D-4
Director Remuneration
|
|
23. |
Director Compensation |
The form and amount of director compensation will be determined
by the Governance and Nominating Committee in accordance with
the policies and principles set forth in its charter and then
recommended to the full Board. Management shall report to the
Governance and Nominating Committee annually on an assessment of
the Companys director compensation measured against
comparable companies. Independent directors will receive no
additional compensation, in the form of consulting fees or other
specific benefits, beyond that provided for service on the Board.
The directors shall be entitled to have the Company purchase
reasonable directors and officers liability
insurance on their behalf, to the benefits of indemnification to
the fullest extent permitted by law and the Companys
charter, by-laws and any indemnification agreements, and to
exculpation as provided by state law and the Companys
charter.
Performance Evaluations
|
|
25. |
CEO Evaluation and Management Succession |
The Board of Directors will conduct an annual review of the
CEOs performance. The Board of Directors will evaluate
whether the CEO is providing the best leadership for the Company
in the long- and short term. The Compensation and Employee
Benefits Committee will then conduct a review of and make a
recommendation regarding the CEOs compensation as set
forth in its charter, which it will present to the Board. The
Board will determine the CEOs compensation.
The Board should make an annual review of management succession
planning. The entire Board will work with the Governance and
Nominating Committee to nominate and evaluate potential
successors to the CEO. The CEO should at all times make
available his or her recommendations and evaluations of
potential successors, along with a review of any development
plans recommended for such individuals.
|
|
26. |
Annual Performance Evaluation |
The Board of Directors will conduct an annual self-evaluation to
determine whether it and its committees are functioning
effectively. The Governance and Nominating Committee will
receive comments from all directors and report annually to the
Board with an assessment of the Boards performance. The
assessment will focus on the Boards contribution to the
Company and specifically focus on areas in which the Board or
management believes that the Board could improve.
March 1, 2004
D-5
PART II. INFORMATION NOT
REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
provides that a corporation may indemnify directors and officers
as well as other employees and individuals against expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement in connection with specified actions, suits
or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
corporation, a derivative action), if they acted in good faith
and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed
to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to
any criminal action or proceedings, had no reasonable cause to
believe their conduct was unlawful.
A similar standard is applicable in the case of derivative
actions, except that indemnification only extends to expenses
(including attorneys fees) actually and reasonably
incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of such
action, and the statute requires court approval before there can
be any indemnification where the person seeking indemnification
has been found liable to the corporation. The statute provides
that it is not exclusive of other indemnification that may be
granted by a corporations certificate of incorporation,
by-laws, disinterested director vote, stockholder vote,
agreement or otherwise.
As permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General
Corporate Law, Article IV of SBCs by-laws provides
that SBC shall indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative
(including any action or suit by or in the right of the
corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a
director, officer or employee of the corporation, or, while such
person is or was a director, officer or employee of the
corporation, such person is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee, or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, or other
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees),
judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such
action, suit, or proceeding, but in each case only if and to the
extent permitted under applicable state or federal law.
Article IV of SBCs by-laws further states that the
indemnification provided herein shall not be deemed exclusive of
any other rights to which those indemnified may be entitled, and
shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director,
officer, employee, or agent, and shall inure to the benefit of
the heirs and personal representatives of such a person.
SBCs restated certificate of incorporation also provides
that no director will be liable to SBC or its stockholders for
monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
except for liability (1) for any breach of the
directors duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders; (2) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or which involve intentional misconduct or knowing violation of
the law; (3) under Section 174 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law; or (4) for any transaction from which a
director derived an improper benefit.
SBC has purchased insurance on behalf of any person who is or
was a director, officer, employee or agent of SBC, or is or was
serving at the request of SBC as a director, officer, employee
or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against
him and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of
his status as such, whether or not SBC would have the power to
indemnify him against such liability under the provisions of
SBCs restated certificate of incorporation, as amended.
II-1
|
|
Item 21. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 30, 2005,
among AT&T Corp., SBC Communications Inc. and Tau Merger Sub
Corporation (included as Annex A to the document forming a
part of this Registration Statement) |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of SBC, filed with the
Secretary of State of Delaware on June 30, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-a to SBCs
2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K) |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Bylaws amended through April 30, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3-b to SBCs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2004) |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of James D. Ellis as to the validity of the securities
being registered* |
|
8 |
.1 |
|
Form of Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as to
certain United States federal income tax matters |
|
8 |
.2 |
|
Form of Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz as to
certain United States federal income tax matters |
|
12 |
|
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges of
SBC Communications Inc. |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, registered public
accounting firm for SBC |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, registered public
accounting firm for AT&T Corp. |
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, registered public
accounting firm for Cingular Wireless LLC |
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, registered public
accounting firm for Omnipoint Facilities
Network II, LLC |
|
23 |
.5 |
|
Consent of James D. Ellis (included as part of Exhibit 5.1
to this Registration Statement)* |
|
23 |
.6 |
|
Consent of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (included as part of
Exhibit 8.1 to this Registration Statement)* |
|
23 |
.7 |
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included as
part of Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration Statement)* |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney of Officer/Director of SBC** |
|
24 |
.2 |
|
Power of Attorney of Directors of SBC** |
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Form of Proxy Card |
|
99 |
.2 |
|
Form of Information on Voting Procedures |
|
99 |
.3 |
|
Opinion of Credit Suisse First Boston Inc. (included as
Annex B to the proxy statement/ prospectus included in this
Registration Statement) |
|
99 |
.4 |
|
Opinion of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (included
as Annex C to the proxy statement/ prospectus included in
this Registration Statement) |
|
99 |
.5 |
|
Consent of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC |
|
99 |
.6 |
|
Consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated |
|
99 |
.7 |
|
Employment Agreement by and between SBC and David W. Dorman,
dated as of January 30, 2005* |
|
99 |
.8 |
|
Consents of persons about to become directors of SBC* |
* To be filed by amendment.
** Previously filed.
(A) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as follows:
|
|
|
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement: |
|
|
|
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
|
|
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the |
II-2
|
|
|
changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change
in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
Calculation of Registration Fee table in the
effective registration statement; |
|
|
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement; |
|
|
|
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof; and |
|
|
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. |
(B) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the registrants annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
(C) (1) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes
as follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the
securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus
which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or
party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), SBC undertakes that such reoffering prospectus
will contain the information called for by the applicable
registration form with respect to reofferings by persons who may
be deemed underwriters, in addition to the information called
for by the other Items of the applicable form.
(2) The registrant undertakes that every prospectus:
(i) that is filed pursuant to
paragraph (1) immediately preceding, or (ii) that
purports to meet the requirements of Section 10(a) (3) of
the Act and is used in connection with an offering of securities
subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an
amendment to the registration statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(D) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
(E) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11 or 13 of
this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request,
and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or
other equally prompt means. This includes information contained
in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the
registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(F) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
the registration statement when it became effective.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of San Antonio, State of Texas, on this
20th day of April, 2005.
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard G. Lindner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Richard G. Lindner |
|
Title: Senior Executive Vice President |
|
and
Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
this Registration Statement has been signed below by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer:
|
|
Edward E. Whitacre, Jr.*
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer: |
|
Richard G. Lindner
Senior Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gilbert F. Amelio*
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Richard G. Lindner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarence C. Barksdale*
|
|
|
|
Richard G. Lindner, |
August A. Busch III*
|
|
|
|
as attorney-in-fact for |
William P. Clark*
|
|
|
|
Mr. Whitacre, the Directors, |
Martin K. Eby, Jr.*
|
|
|
|
and on his own behalf |
James A. Henderson*
|
|
|
|
as Principal Financial and |
Lynn M. Martin*
|
|
|
|
Accounting Officer |
John B. McCoy*
|
|
|
|
|
Mary S. Metz*
|
|
April 20, 2005 |
Toni Rembe*
|
|
|
|
|
S. Donley Ritchey*
|
|
|
|
|
Joyce M. Roché*
|
|
|
|
|
Laura DAndrea Tyson*
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia P. Upton*
|
|
|
|
|
Edward E. Whitacre, Jr.*
|
|
|
|
|
II-4
EXHIBITS LIST
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 30, 2005,
among AT&T Corp., SBC Communications Inc. and Tau Merger Sub
Corporation (included as Annex A to the document forming a
part of this Registration Statement) |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of SBC, filed with the
Secretary of State of Delaware on June 30, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-a to SBCs
2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K) |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Bylaws amended through April 30, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3-b to SBCs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2004) |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of James D. Ellis as to the validity of the securities
being registered* |
|
8 |
.1 |
|
Form of Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as to
certain United States federal income tax matters |
|
8 |
.2 |
|
Form of Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz as to
certain United States federal income tax matters |
|
12 |
. |
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges of
SBC Communications Inc. |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, registered public
accounting firm for SBC |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, registered public
accounting firm for AT&T Corp. |
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, registered public
accounting firm for Cingular Wireless LLC |
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, registered public
accounting firm for Omnipoint Facilities
Network II, LLC |
|
23 |
.5 |
|
Consent of James D. Ellis (included as part of Exhibit 5.1
to this Registration Statement)* |
|
23 |
.6 |
|
Consent of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (included as part of
Exhibit 8.1 to this Registration Statement)* |
|
23 |
.7 |
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included as
part of Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration Statement)* |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney of Officer/Director of SBC** |
|
24 |
.2 |
|
Power of Attorney of Directors of SBC** |
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Form of Proxy Card |
|
99 |
.2 |
|
Form of Information on Voting Procedures |
|
99 |
.3 |
|
Opinion of Credit Suisse First Boston Inc. (included as
Annex B to the proxy statement/ prospectus included in this
Registration Statement) |
|
99 |
.4 |
|
Opinion of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (included
as Annex C to the proxy statement/ prospectus included in
this Registration Statement) |
|
99 |
.5 |
|
Consent of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC |
|
99 |
.6 |
|
Consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated |
|
99 |
.7 |
|
Employment Agreement by and between SBC and David W. Dorman,
dated as of January 30, 2005* |
|
99 |
.8 |
|
Consents of persons about to become directors of SBC* |
* To be filed by amendment.
** Previously filed.