UNITED STATES |
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
|
|
FORM 10-K |
|
(Mark One) |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002,
or
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
|
|
Commission file number 0-6866 |
|
|
|
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Delaware |
04-2423640 |
Mansfield Corporate Center, |
02048-9171 |
|
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (508) 337-5500 |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
|
Common Stock, $1 Par Value |
|
(Title of class) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x No oDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document Description |
Part of Form 10-K into Which Incorporated |
|
Portions of the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC in March 2003 |
Part III |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Products and Services
Vacuum Pumping Components and Systems
Our CTI-Cryogenics cryopumps and systems create an impurity-free vacuum environment for both the PVD and ion implantation markets. Our pumps offer customers rapid, customizable pump speeds, quick system pumpdown and impurity-free vacuum pumping processes without the use of fluids, lubricants or moving parts, ensuring high product yields and process throughputs. Our On-Board system enables central monitoring and control, either in-fab or at remote sites, of every significant function of both individual pumps and entire vacuum networks. We currently supply essentially all major front-end semiconductor capital equipment OEMs and semiconductor manufacturers.
We also provide waterpumps and turbopumps, under the TurboPlus® line of products, to support the CVD and etch processes. Our waterpumps are high-performance vacuum pumps that optimize the performance of CVD and etch systems by increasing water vapor pumping speed by a factor of five or more, improving system throughput and providing better process results. TurboPlus Vacuum Pumps offer the process advantages of throughput pumping from the turbopump and the uptime benefits of high-speed water vapor pumping, integrated into a compact package with a single, easy-to-use interface.
Over the last three years, net sales of our CTI-Cryogenics products and related support services represented the majority of our consolidated net sales.
Vacuum Measurement Components and Systems
Our Granville-Phillips STABIL-ION®, CONVECTRON® and MICRO-ION® vacuum measurement components and systems are used in the PVD, ion implantation, CVD, and etch processes. Our vacuum gauging products are also integrated into analytical instruments, primarily mass spectrometers. STABIL-ION, CONVECTRON and MICRO-ION systems are individually calibrated at numerous pressure values resulting in a stable and accurate gauge that does not change calibration with time of use. This stable calibration is essential to starting the production process at the same true pressure on every production run. It also provides improved gauge-to-gauge reproducibility, which is essential for process replication.
Companies depend on our measurement systems to provide repeatable readings, ensuring that processes start at the desired pressure. Non-repeatable gauges can shift over time, causing two different effects:
- |
If the gauge reads lower than the actual pressure, a process can be started when the pressure is too high, possibly causing product defects. |
- |
If the gauge reads higher than the actual pressure, the system will pump down to a pressure lower than necessary for a process. This is equivalent to system downtime. |
Over the last three years, net sales of our Granville-Phillips products and related services represented between 15% and 20% of our net sales.
Global Support Services
To our customers, even a few minutes of production downtime is unacceptable. Given the magnitude of the investment in plant and equipment and the value of the work-in-process, which is expected to increase with the move to 300 millimeter production equipment, tool availability is a priority for our customers.
From the industry standard of GUTS to the pioneering e-Diagnostic implementation of GOLDLink support, the Company has continually demonstrated its commitment to serving our customer base with the most advanced, innovative tools available.
We introduced our GUTS rapid response system in 1986. Our GUTS rapid response system is broadly recognized for delivering superior responsiveness to problems whenever and wherever they may occur. Every call to our customer service center is answered by a capable, empowered Company employee who has the resources to diagnose a customer problem and initiate corrective action, including dispatching a technician or part to the customer in less than one hour.
While our GUTS rapid response system continues to be a leader in reactive customer support, the industry is moving toward enhanced service offerings which rely on proactive problem solving to boost customer productivity. Extended service agreements which leverage
Helix core competencies and rely on key technology and capabilities such as Internet-based remote e-diagnostics can further enhance production efficiency and throughput. With the introduction of TrueBluesm Service Agreements we are well positioned to extend the benefits of e-diagnostics using our On-Board Information Network and our GOLDLink capability. Coupled with our On-Board technology, the GOLDLink network provides us with the ability to access performance data of key vacuum system components, including third-party products, right at the production tool. GOLDLink consists of three key components: hardware and software located on tools in the manufacturing facility, our customer support center and support engineers, and the networks connecting the tools and our support operations.
Our GOLDLink capability allows our customers to redirect their employees to focus on their core competencies by leveraging our vacuum technology and control core competencies. Our ability to detect performance anomalies before they cause a system failure minimizes our customers' risk of significant tool downtime and can result in increased plant productivity.
In the past few years, we received approximately 30% to 40% of our net sales from our global support services, including the delivery and installation of spare parts, retrofits and upgrades.
Customers
We market and sell our products and services primarily to large original equipment and end-user manufacturers of semiconductor, data storage, flat panel display, and other industrial applications. Net sales to OEMs represented 50%, 53% and 72% of our net sales for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Semiconductor Customers
We sell our products and services primarily to semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers and end-users for incorporation into equipment used to make integrated circuits. Our products are currently used in a variety of applications including CVD, PVD, ion implantation and etch. We are also building products for use in the lithography process of semiconductor manufacturing. Precise vacuum pressure levels are critical in enabling the production of integrated circuits. We anticipate that the semiconductor capital equipment industry will continue to be a substantial part of our business for the foreseeable future.
Data Storage Customers
We sell products and services to data storage equipment manufacturers and to data storage device manufacturers for use in producing a variety of products including CDs; computer hard disks, including both media and thin-film heads; CD-ROMs; and DVDs. These products use a PVD process to produce optical and magnetic thin-film layers, as well as a protective wear layer.
Flat Panel Display Customers
We sell our products and services to equipment manufacturers and manufacturers of flat panel displays, which have fabrication processes similar to those employed in manufacturing integrated circuits. Flat panel technology produces bright, sharp, large, color-rich images on flat screens for products ranging from hand-held computer games to laptop and desktop computer monitors to large-screen televisions.
Other Customers
We sell our products and services to OEMs and producers of end products in a variety of industrial markets. Our products are used in a variety of analytical instruments and industrial and scientific research products. Thin-film optical coatings are used in the manufacture of many industrial products including architectural glass, eyeglasses, lenses, and front surface mirrors. Thin films of diamond-like coatings and other materials are currently applied to products to strengthen and harden surfaces on such diverse products as tools, razor blades, automotive parts, and hip joint replacements.
The table below represents some of our customers in each of our primary target markets:
Semiconductors |
Semiconductor Equipment |
Data Storage |
|
|
|
Agere |
Applied Materials |
Seagate |
Atmel |
Axcelis |
Unaxis |
Fujitsu |
Matsushita |
Veeco |
Infineon |
Novellus |
|
Intel |
Varian Semiconductor |
Flat Panel Displays |
Motorola |
Veeco |
|
NEC |
|
AKT |
Samsung |
|
Philips |
STMicroelectronics |
|
|
Texas Instruments |
|
Analytical Instruments |
TSMC |
|
|
|
|
Agilent |
|
|
Riber |
Research and Development
Our industry continues to experience rapid technological change, requiring us to frequently introduce new products and enhancements. We believe that our success will depend upon our ability to identify and provide total systems solutions for our customers' problems. We seek to develop new products and enhancements to our existing products that meet changing customer requirements in our current and new markets. We have in the past made, and expect to continue to make, substantial investments in product and technological development. We believe our experience and relationships will remain important factors to enable us to develop products to meet our customers' needs and penetrate our target markets. Through our direct sales process, we monitor changing customer needs, changes in the marketplace and emerging industry standards, and are therefore better able to focus our research and development efforts to address these evolving industry requirements.
We expended $14.7 million in 2002 and $16.1 million in both 2001 and 2000 on research and development efforts. We have continued our commitment to invest in new product development to maintain our technological and market leadership, including new products for commercial applications, projects for 300 millimeter products, and enhancements of our core products and GOLDLink support. We perform our research and product development activities at our headquarters facility in Mansfield, Massachusetts, and at our Longmont, Colorado facility.
Joint Venture with ULVAC
We participate in a joint venture, ULVAC Cryogenics, Inc., or UCI, with ULVAC Corporation of Chigasaki, Japan. Formed in 1981, UCI manufactures and sells cryogenic vacuum pumps, principally to ULVAC, one of the largest semiconductor OEMs in Japan. Each company owns 50% of UCI and we made an initial cash investment of approximately $100,000, with no subsequent cash investments. The joint venture arrangement includes a license and technology agreement from us and a management and consultation agreement from ULVAC.
Competition
The markets for our products and services are highly competitive and are characterized by ongoing technological development and changing customer requirements. We believe that market-driven pressures on our customers to increase productivity and reduce costs are prevalent throughout the markets for our products. In markets in which we have an established presence, we compete primarily on the basis of product performance, applications expertise, and historical customer relationships and support. In new markets for our products, we compete primarily on the basis of product performance, price, and range of features. Other significant competitive factors in our markets include product reliability, on-time delivery, technology and the ability to adaptively provide solutions for our customers' evolving needs.
We have foreign and domestic competitors for each of our product lines. Some of these competitors are subsidiaries or divisions of larger corporations and have greater resources than we have. If these competitors bring technologically superior products to market in the future, they could overcome our competitive advantages. Our ability to continue to compete successfully depends on our ability to make timely introductions of system enhancements and new products and services, particularly relating to the new 300 millimeter technology, while continuing to provide excellent pre- and post-sales support on existing products and services. We believe we will be required to maintain a high level of investment in research and development and sales and marketing in order to remain competitive.
We are among a relatively small number of companies in the vacuum technology market. If one of our competitors acquires, or is acquired by, another company in this sector, it could result in a stronger competitor with greater resources than we have. Alternatively, if one of our customers were to acquire a vacuum technology company so that it could supply its own requirements, our net sales would decrease.
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, we had 547 permanent and 28 temporary employees worldwide, of which 467 were employed in North America, 71 in Asia and 37 in Europe. As of December 31, 2002, none of our employees based in the United States were represented by a union, and we have never experienced a work stoppage, slowdown or strike. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
Environmental Affairs
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate that regulate, among other things: air emissions; water discharges; and the generation, use, storage, transportation, handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes produced by our manufacturing, research and development and sales activities. As with other companies engaged in like businesses, the
nature of our operations exposes us to the risk of environmental liabilities, claims, penalties and orders. We believe, however, that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and that there are no pending environmental matters that would have a material impact on our business.
Intellectual Property
We rely on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection, as well as contractual restrictions, in the United States and in other countries to protect our proprietary rights in our products and our business. As of December 31, 2002, we had 100 patents in the United States and 105 patents in other countries, as well as 54 patent applications (11 in the United States and 43 in other countries) on file with various patent agencies worldwide. These patents expire at various years through 2021. No patents that we consider significant expire during the next five years.
We have a number of trademarks that we consider important to our business. These trademarks are protected by registration in the United States and other countries in which we market our products.
Backlog
We had approximately a $6.2 million backlog of orders that we believed to be firm at December 31, 2002, compared with $7.0 million at December 31, 2001. We expect to recognize revenue from essentially all of the December 31, 2002, backlog during 2003.
Available Information
The Company's Internet address is www.helixtechnology.com. We make available free of charge through our Website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information contained on the Website is not part of this report.
ITEM 1A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
Set forth below is information regarding our current executive officers who do not serve as our directors.
Name and Title |
Age |
Business Experience |
James Gentilcore |
50 |
Mr. Gentilcore joined us as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in December 2002. Prior to joining Helix, Mr. Gentilcore spent six years with Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of integrated subsystems for the semiconductor industry, most recently as Chief Operating Officer. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. Gentilcore served as Corporate Vice President of Marketing at MKS Instruments Inc., a manufacturer of process instrumentation and subsystems for the semiconductor industry. |
Jay Zager |
53 |
Mr. Zager joined us as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2002. From May 2000 to October 2001, Mr. Zager served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Inrange Technologies Corporation, a storage networking company. He served as a Vice President in the Enterprise Solutions Group of Compaq Computer Corporation from 1998 through 1999. From 1985 through 1998, Mr. Zager held several senior management positions with Digital Equipment Corporation, including Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Worldwide Engineering and Research; Vice President, Business Development; and Group Controller of the U.S. Sales and Service division. |
Robert E. Anastasi |
56 |
Mr. Anastasi has served as Executive Vice President since February 2001. Prior to that he served as a Senior Vice President from July 1997 until February 2001 and as a Vice President from June 1991 to July 1997. |
Mark E. Jalbert |
50 |
Mr. Jalbert was elected as Senior Vice President in December 2002. Prior to that he served as Senior Vice President of Global Customer Operations from September 2001 until December 2002, Vice President of Sales from 1998 to September 2001, Director of Sales from 1997 to 1998, and Regional Sales Manager from 1988 to 1997. |
Susan Cutright |
42 |
Ms. Cutright joined us as our Vice President and General Counsel in July 2002. Prior to that, she served as Vice President and General Counsel of Interoute Telecommunications, Inc., a telecommunications company, from August 1999 through 2001. From 1989 to August 1999, she served in various legal and management positions with Westinghouse Electric Corporation (a media and industrial conglomerate renamed CBS Corporation and merged with Viacom, Inc.) and its voice and data communications division. |
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Location |
|
Size (Sq. Ft.) |
|
Lease Expires |
|
Functions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts |
|
155,000 |
|
2006 |
(1) |
|
Corporate headquarters, engineering, |
|
|
63,000 |
|
2004 |
|
|
manufacturing, sales and marketing, customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
support, repair center, and administration |
Colorado |
|
60,000 |
|
2015 |
|
|
Engineering, manufacturing, and sales and marketing |
California |
|
11,000 |
|
2003 |
|
|
Sales office, customer support, and repair center |
Texas |
|
12,000 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Sales office and customer support |
Arizona |
|
3,000 |
|
2006 |
|
|
Sales office and customer support |
Scotland |
|
5,300 |
|
2020 |
|
|
Sales office and customer support |
Germany |
|
2,500 |
|
2003 |
|
|
Sales office and customer support |
France |
|
6,400 |
|
2003 |
|
|
Sales office, customer support, and repair center |
Japan |
|
4,200 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Sales office and customer support |
|
|
8,100 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Repair center |
Taiwan |
|
7,500 |
|
2003 |
|
|
Sales office, customer support, and repair center |
China |
|
8,300 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Sales office, customer support, and repair center |
(1) The lease on this facility provides for renewal options for up to fifteen additional years.
We believe we have adequate facilities to meet our currently anticipated requirements and that suitable additional or substitute facilities will be available if required.
During the fourth quarter of 2002, we initiated a plan to consolidate our Massachusetts operations into our existing 155,000 square foot facility and reduce our space requirements at our Arizona, California, Texas and Japan operations.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Company concluded a settlement with Raytheon Company pursuant to an Agreement in Principle dated July 11, 2002, in connection with an action brought in 1998 in Massachusetts Superior Court, and involving allegations of defects in certain components the Company discontinued selling in 1994. While we continuously denied all claims, the Company and its insurers concluded that it was in the Company's best interest to reach an out-of-court settlement to avoid the distraction and expense of a jury trial. Under the terms of the settlement, the Company paid $2.8 million and insurance providers paid an additional $2.1 million and essentially all of the legal costs associated with the litigation.
The Company may be involved in the normal course in ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business. The Company is not a party to any proceedings that involve amounts that would have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations if such proceedings were resolved unfavorably.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2002, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol HELX. At December 31, 2002, there were 26,103,204 shares of common stock outstanding and approximately 590 common stockholders of record.
Price Range of Common Stock and Cash Dividend Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices per share of our common stock during each of the quarters for the two most recent fiscal years.
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$26.25 |
|
$30.14 |
|
$20.78 |
|
$14.90 |
|
Low |
|
$18.05 |
|
$17.85 |
|
$ 8.47 |
|
$ 6.65 |
|
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ 0.08 |
|
$ 0.08 |
|
$ 0.08 |
|
$ 0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$32.91 |
|
$33.44 |
|
$30.55 |
|
$24.50 |
|
Low |
|
$21.13 |
|
$20.38 |
|
$14.75 |
|
$14.97 |
|
Cash dividends per share |
|
$ 0.12 |
|
$ 0.12 |
|
$ 0.12 |
|
$ 0.08 |
On January 29, 2003, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per common share payable on February 19, 2003, to common stockholders of record at the close of business on February 10, 2003.
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
|||
Number of securites |
|||
Remaining available for future |
|||
issuance under equity |
|||
Number of securities to be |
compensation plans |
||
issued upon exercise of |
Weighted-average exercise |
(excluding securities reflected |
|
outstanding options |
price of outstanding options |
in column(a)) |
|
Plan category |
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
Equity compensation plans |
|||
approved by security holders |
619,000 |
$20.50 |
181,250 |
Equity compensation plans not |
|||
approved by security holders |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Total |
619,000 |
$20.50 |
181,250 |
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table summarizes certain selected consolidated financial data that should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein. In connection with the acquisition of Granville-Phillips Company in 1998, accounted for as a pooling of interests, all prior-period financial data has been restated to include the impact of the combination.
|
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands except per share data) |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
$ |
100,241 |
$ |
112,994 |
$ |
253,085 |
$ |
139,389 |
$ |
95.345 |
||||||||||
Net (loss) income(1) |
|
$ |
(19,418 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,940 |
) |
|
$ |
45,870 |
|
|
$ |
15,864 |
|
|
$ |
(1,920 |
) |
Basic net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
Cash dividends per share(2) |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
159,471 |
|
|
$ |
113,580 |
|
|
$ |
141,968 |
|
|
$ |
93,655 |
|
|
$ |
75,652 |
|
Basic shares |
|
|
25,364 |
|
|
|
22,565 |
|
|
|
22,498 |
|
|
|
22,336 |
|
|
|
22,262 |
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
25,364 |
|
|
|
22,565 |
|
|
|
22,762 |
|
|
|
22,623 |
|
|
|
22,262 |
|
(1) Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002, reflects $13,214,000 of a litigation settlement, restructurings and other charges, work force reductions, exit costs for leased facilities and writeoff of certain assets. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001, reflects a restructuring charge of $1,047,000 related to work force reductions. Net income for the year ended December 31, 1999, reflects the gain on sale of our Colorado facility of $1,397,000. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1998, reflects merger and other special charges of $3,546,000 related to the acquisition of Granville-Phillips Company and restructuring and other special charges of $2,500,000 related to work force reductions, exit costs for a leased facility, and impairment of certain assets. See Note I of "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."
(2) Cash dividends per share declared in periods prior to the acquisition of Granville-Phillips Company are based on shares outstanding at that time and therefore do not reflect the 2,383,000 shares issued as part of the acquisition.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our financial statements, related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this report contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to competitive factors and other factors discussed under "Forward-Looking Statements" below and under "Important Factors That May Affect Future Results" in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a world leader in the development, manufacture, and application of innovative vacuum technology solutions for the semiconductor, data storage, and flat panel display markets. Our vacuum systems provide enabling technology for several key steps within the semiconductor manufacturing process, including ion implantation, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition and etching. Semiconductor manufacturers use our systems to create and maintain a vacuum environment, which is critical to their manufacturing processes. We are a leading provider of vacuum systems technology to the world's largest semiconductor capital equipment and semiconductor manufacturers, placing us at a critical point in their advanced technology manufacturing process. We have long-standing customer relationships with many semiconductor capital equipment manufacturers, including Applied Materials, Axcelis, Matsushita, Novellus, Varian Semiconductor and Veeco, as well as semiconductor manufacturers such as Agere, Atmel, Fujitsu, Infineon, Intel, Motorola, NEC, Samsung, STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments. Our products are also used in a broad range of industrial manufacturing applications and advanced research and development laboratories.
We also provide an extensive range of global support and vacuum system monitoring services that lower our end-users' total costs of ownership. We increase our customers' system uptime through rapid response to potential operating problems. We also develop and deliver enhancements to our customers' installed base of production tools. Our service offerings include our unique GUTS (Guaranteed Up Time Support) customer response system and our innovative GOLDLink (Global On-Line Diagnostics) support
system, which provides a remote e-diagnostics solution that allows us to monitor, in real time, the vacuum system performance of our customers' production tools. Our GOLDLink capability has made us a leading total solution provider in the emerging market for Internet-based, proactive e-diagnostics for the semiconductor and semiconductor capital equipment industries.
The principal market we serve is the global semiconductor capital equipment industry, a highly cyclical business. As a result, we have experienced significant variations in net sales, expenses, and results of operations in the periods presented and such variations are likely to continue.
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations and liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, adequacy of reserves, valuation of investments and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results may differ from our estimates. We believe that the following significant accounting policies and assumptions may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than others.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize net sales from product sales upon shipment provided title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Net sales from global support services is recognized as performed or ratably over the period of the related agreements. We recognize net sales from upgrade sales upon customer acceptance provided installation has been completed. As part of a sale, we offer customers a warranty on defects in materials and workmanship. We continuously monitor and track the related product returns and record a provision for the estimated amount of such future returns, based on historical experience and any notification we receive of pending returns. While such returns have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same return rates that we have in the past. Any significant increase in material and workmanship defect rates and the resulting credit returns could have a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such returns materialize. We also maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Inventory and Reserves for Excess and Obsolescence. We value inventory at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision to write down inventory to its estimated net realizable value, if less than cost, based upon management's assumptions of future material usage and obsolescence, which are a result of future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions become less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory provisions may be required. If inventory is written down to its net realizable value and subsequently there is an increased demand for the inventory at a higher value, the increased value of the inventory is not realized until the inventory is sold, which will result in improved margins in the period.
Investments. We own 50% of a joint venture, ULVAC Cryogenics, Inc., or UCI, which manufactures and sells cryogenic vacuum pumps in Japan, principally to ULVAC Corporation. We account for the joint venture using the equity method of accounting, and we also receive royalties from the joint venture under the terms of a license and technology agreement. The royalties we receive from UCI, as well as our equity in the income and losses of UCI, are both included in our financial statements under joint venture income.
Restructuring Charges. During 2002 and 2001, we recorded significant charges in connection with our restructuring programs. The related reserves reflect estimates, including those pertaining to severance costs and settlements of contractual obligations. We reassess the reserve requirements to complete each individual plan under our restructuring programs at the end of each reporting period. Actual experience may be different from these estimates. For more information, see Note I to the consolidated financial statements.
Tax Contingencies. Tax contingencies are recorded to address potential exposures involving tax positions we have taken that could be challenged by taxing authorities. These potential exposures result from the varying application of statutes, rules, regulations and interpretations. Our estimate of the value of our tax contingencies contains assumptions based on past experiences and judgments about potential actions by taxing jurisdictions. It is reasonably likely that the ultimate resolution of these matters may be greater or less than the amount that we have accrued.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002, Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001
In 2002, we continued to experience the significant slowdown in the global market for semiconductor capital equipment that began in 2001. Net sales for 2002 were $100.2 million as compared with net sales for 2001 of $113.0 million, a decrease of 11.3%. We are currently experiencing stable weekly order bookings; however, visibility remains unclear.
Cost of sales for 2002 was $73.0 million compared with $75.3 million for 2001, a decrease of 3.0%. The gross margin for 2002 was 27.1% compared with 33.4% for 2001. Cost of sales for 2002 included an additional fourth quarter charge for excess and obsolete inventory totaling $1.7 million resulting from the significant slowdown in the global market for semiconductor capital equipment and from expected efficiencies to be gained in our future delivery of global customer support. We monitor and forecast expected inventory needs based on our constantly changing sales forecast and writedown or writeoff inventory when it becomes obsolete or when it is deemed excess. Excluding these charges, the gross margin for 2002 would have been 28.8%, a decline from 2001, primarily due to lower sales volume that reduced utilization of manufacturing capacity.
Research and development expenses were $14.7 million for 2002, or 14.6% of net sales, compared to $16.1 million for 2001, or 14.2% of net sales. We maintain a commitment to developing technologies to support a new generation of products for 300 millimeter- capable production tools, to expand our support service capability and to improve our core component product lines.
Total selling, general and administrative expenses for 2002 were $37.7 million, as compared with $35.1 for 2001. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the nonrecurring litigation settlement charge of $2.8 million in 2002. Total selling, general and administrative expenses excluding the nonrecurring litigation settlement charge remained consistent with the prior year, reflecting a decrease in spending due to the restructuring program completed in the third quarter of 2001 offset by an increase in depreciation expense associated with our new global information system and associated startup costs. Depreciation expenses are expected to remain at their current levels in 2003. However, our ongoing cost containment and cost reduction initiatives are expected to reduce future selling, general and administrative expenses.
Restructurings and other charges recorded during the fourth quarter of 2002 were associated with the initiation of a worldwide cost-reduction program and the suspension of an internal-use software development program in response to the continued duration and severity of the slowdown in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. The $8.7 million charged to restructurings and other charges is comprised of $3.0 million of employee severance costs; $2.8 million to consolidate leased facilities; and $2.9 million to write off certain software.
The employee costs of $3.0 million primarily consist of severance and fringe benefits to terminate approximately 130 employees. The affected employees, most of whom were located in the United States, were primarily full-time nonmanufacturing employees. Notification and termination benefits were communicated to employees in the fourth quarter of 2002. The majority of the terminations took place in 2002, and the remaining terminations are expected in the first quarter of 2003. All remaining severance benefits are expected to be paid in full during 2003. The Company expects to realize approximately $2.0 million in quarterly savings from the reduction in force.
The $2.8 million of net exit costs related to facility closures resulted from the planned consolidation of customer support facilities located in Massachusetts; facility reductions of satellite sales and customer support facilities located in Texas, Arizona, and California; and consolidation of sales and service centers located in Japan. These accrued costs reflect payments required under operating lease contracts in excess of expected sub lease rentals and costs for writing down related leasehold improvements at the affected facilities. The consolidation of these facilities is expected to result in quarterly cost savings of approximately $0.4 million.
We also suspended an internal-use software development program given current market conditions and timing of market application, resulting in a $2.9 million charge.
Royalty and equity income from our joint venture in Japan for 2002 decreased to $0.6 million from $2.4 million in 2001 due to the continued decline in the Japanese semiconductor capital equipment market.
Interest and other income was $0.9 million for both 2002 and 2001. In 2002, higher average cash, cash equivalent and investment balances resulting from the public offering completed in March 2002 were offset by lower interest rates.
We had a pretax loss of $32.4 million in 2002, resulting in a tax benefit of $12.9 million, compared with a pretax loss of $11.2 million and a tax benefit of $5.3 million for 2001. The effective tax rates for 2002 and 2001 were 40% and 47%, respectively. The tax rates
differ from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to tax credits and undistributed nontaxable equity income from our joint venture. These tax credits and equity income increase our tax rate on pretax losses and decrease our tax rate on pretax income. The decline in the 2002 tax rate was primarily attributable to the decline in the benefit received from lower undistributed nontaxable equity income from our joint venture.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2001, Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000
In 2001, a slowdown in the global market for semiconductor capital equipment impacted us after we had experienced a period of significant growth in 1999 and 2000. Our net sales for 2001 were $113.0 million compared with net sales for 2000 of $253.1 million, a decrease of 55.4%.
Cost of sales for 2001 was $75.3 million compared with $132.0 million for 2000, a decrease of 43.0%. The gross margin for 2001 was 33.4% compared with 47.9% for 2000. The reduction in gross margin was primarily attributable to decreased production volume as overhead costs were spread over a smaller sales base.
Research and development expenses were $16.1 million for both 2001 and 2000, or 14.2% and 6.4% of net sales in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Despite the significant near-term reduction in product demand, we continued in 2001 to focus on developing technologies to support a new generation of products for 300 millimeter-capable production tools, to expand our GOLDLink support service capability and to improve our core component product lines.
Total selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $35.1 million in 2001 compared with $42.4 million in 2000. Our spending declined due to cost containment measures, including reductions in senior management compensation expenses, initiated during 2001.
During the third quarter of 2001, we implemented and completed a restructuring program in response to the continued slowdown in the semiconductor capital equipment industry that resulted in the reduction of approximately 110 permanent employees. As a result, we recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $1.0 million primarily related to severance payments and fringe benefit costs.
Royalty and equity income from our joint venture in Japan decreased by $1.7 million to $2.4 million in 2001 from $4.1 million in 2000, due to the decline in the Japanese semiconductor capital equipment market in 2001.
Interest and other income for 2001 was $0.9 million, compared with $1.2 million for 2000, reflecting lower interest rates and lower average cash, cash equivalent and investment balances in 2001.
We had a pretax loss of $11.2 million in 2001, resulting in a tax benefit of $5.3 million, compared with pretax income of $68.0 million and a tax provision of $22.1 million for 2000. The effective tax rates for 2001 and 2000 were 47.0% and 32.5%, respectively. The tax rates differ from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to tax credits and undistributed nontaxable equity income from our joint venture. These tax credits and equity income reduced our tax rate on 2000 pretax income and increased our tax rate on 2001 pretax losses.
Quarterly Financial Results
The following table presents selected unaudited financial information for the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2002. The results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of future quarterly results and, accordingly, period-to-period comparisons should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance.
Quarter Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 30, |
June 29, |
Sept. 28, |
Dec. 31, |
March 29, |
June 28, |
Sept. 27, |
Dec. 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2001 |
2001 |
2001 |
2002 |
2002 |
2002 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands except per share data) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
48,641 |
$ |
26,604 |
$ |
20,445 |
$ |
17,304 |
$ |
20,380 |
$ |
29,015 |
$ |
27,395 |
$ |
23,451 |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
28,507 |
18,495 |
14,444 |
13,829 |
15,541 |
19,653 |
19,279 |
18,564 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
4,233 |
4,209 |
3,731 |
3,896 |
3,516 |
3,968 |
3,601 |
3,585 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
administrative |
9,905 |
9,460 |
7,860 |
7,850 |
8,059 |
8,514 |
9,413 |
8,932 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Litigation settlement costs |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2,800 |
-- |
-- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
charges |
-- |
-- |
1,047 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
8,714 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
5,996 |
(5,560 |
) |
(6,637 |
) |
(8,271 |
) |
(6,736 |
) |
(5,920 |
) |
(4,898 |
) |
(16,344 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
4,980 |
(3,235 |
) |
(4,082 |
) |
(3,603 |
) |
(4,470 |
) |
(3,787 |
) |
(2,199 |
) |
(8,962 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||
Basic net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share |
0.22 |
(0.14 |
) |
(0.18 |
) |
(0.16 |
) |
(0.19 |
) |
(0.15 |
) |
(0.08 |
) |
(0.34 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
share |
0.22 |
(0.14 |
) |
(0.18 |
) |
(0.16 |
) |
(0.19 |
) |
(0.15 |
) |
(0.08 |
) |
(0.34 |
) |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our existing funds and anticipated cash flow from operations will satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Legal Proceedings
We concluded a settlement with Raytheon Company pursuant to an Agreement in Principle dated July 11, 2002, in connection with an action brought in 1998 in Massachusetts Superior Court, and involving allegations of defects in certain components we discontinued selling in 1994. While we continuously denied all claims, the Company and its insurers concluded that it was in our best interest to reach an out-of-court settlement to avoid the distraction and expense of a jury trial. Under the terms of the settlement, we paid $2.8 million and insurance providers paid an additional $2.1 million and essentially all of the legal costs associated with the litigation.
We may be involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business. We are not a party to any proceedings that involve amounts that would have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations if such proceedings were resolved unfavorably.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS 144), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." The objectives of SFAS 144 are to address significant issues relating to the implementation of FASB Statement No. 121 (SFAS 121), "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," and to develop a single accounting model, based on the framework established in SFAS 121, for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired. SFAS 144 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and, generally, its provisions are to be applied prospectively. At the time we adopted this standard in 2002, it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 (SFAS 146), "Accounting for Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities," which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 94-3. We will adopt the provision of SFAS 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of our commitment to an exit plan. SFAS 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (SFAS 123)," which is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, with early adoption permitted. SFAS 148 will enable companies that choose to adopt the preferable fair value based method to report the full effect of employee stock options in their financial statements immediately upon adoption, and to make available to investors better and more frequent disclosure about the cost of employee stock options. We will continue to apply the disclosure only provisions of both SFAS 123 and SFAS 148.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements appear principally in the sections entitled "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Forward-looking statements may appear in other sections of this report as well. Generally, the forward-looking statements in this report use words like "expect," "anticipate," "plan," "believe," "seek," "estimate," and similar expressions.
The forward-looking statements include statements about:
- |
Our strategic plans; |
- |
The outlook for our business and industry; |
- |
Anticipated expenses; |
- |
Anticipated sources of future revenues; and |
- |
The sufficiency of capital to meet working capital and capital expenditure requirements. |
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause our future results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf. Many such factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Readers are accordingly cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information, future events, or otherwise.
Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, which, in turn, depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing integrated circuits. The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has historically experienced periodic downturns, which generally have had a severe effect on the semiconductor industry's demand for capital equipment and have adversely affected our results of operations. We cannot assure you that developments in the semiconductor industry or the semiconductor equipment industry will occur at the rate or in the manner that we expect.
In addition to the cyclical nature, risks and uncertainties of the semiconductor industry, the Company faces the following risks and uncertainties among others:
- |
Dependence on a limited number of customers and concentration of sales to one or a few customers; |
- |
Reduction of potential customers due to industry consolidation and outsourcing of the manufacture of semiconductors; |
- |
The need to continuously develop, manufacture, and gain customers' acceptance of new products and product enhancements; |
- |
The need to achieve widespread market acceptance among our customers and others of our service initiative; |
- |
Our ability to continue to provide satisfactory levels of product services and maintenance and warranty support to our customers; |
- |
Our ability to compete successfully with current and future competitors in our industry; |
- |
Our ability to continue necessary capital investments during industry downturns and to anticipate or expand sales; |
- |
Dependence upon sole- and limited-source suppliers for certain components and subassemblies included in our products and systems; |
- |
Potential liability claims based on alleged defects in our products or errors in performing product-related services; |
- |
Economic downturns abroad affecting our sales to foreign markets; |
- |
Our ability to protect our proprietary technology without substantial costs and disruption to our core business strategy; |
- |
Our ability to attract and retain certain key personnel; and |
- |
Our ability to expand through acquisitions of complementary businesses and to integrate successfully any acquired companies. |
As a result of the foregoing and other factors, we may experience material fluctuations in our future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially affect our business, financial position, results of operations, and stock price. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in more detail in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
A portion of our business is conducted outside the United States through our foreign subsidiaries. Our foreign subsidiaries maintain their accounting records in their local currencies. Consequently, fluctuations in exchange rates affect the period-to-period comparability of results. To reduce the risks associated with foreign currency rate fluctuations, we have entered into forward exchange contracts on a continuing basis to offset the currency exposures. The gains and losses on these transactions partially offset the unrealized and realized foreign exchange gains and losses of the underlying exposures. The net gains and losses were immaterial for the years presented and were included in cost of sales. We plan to continue to use forward exchange contracts to mitigate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. The notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency contracts at December 31, 2002, was $10.0 million. The potential fair value loss for a hypothetical 10% adverse change in forward currency exchange rates at December 31, 2002, would be $1.0 million, which would be essentially offset by corresponding gains related to underlying assets. The potential loss was estimated calculating the fair value of the forward exchange contracts at December 31, 2002, and comparing that with the value calculated using the hypothetical forward currency exchange rates.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to concentration of credit risk in cash and cash equivalents, investments, trade receivables, and short-term foreign exchange forward contracts. We place our cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions, with high quality credit ratings. Our investments consist of money market funds, municipal government agencies, and tax-free bonds or investment-grade securities. We enter into short-term foreign currency exchange contracts with our primary bank.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SCHEDULES COVERED BY
THE REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Page(s) |
|
Report of Independent Accountants |
20 |
Consolidated Financial Statements of Helix Technology Corporation |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 |
21 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 |
22 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity |
|
for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 |
23 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years |
|
ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 |
24 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
25-38 |
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule for the Years Ended |
|
December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 |
|
|
|
II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
39 |
Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted, since they are either inapplicable or not required.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Helix Technology Corporation:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Helix Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 23, 2003
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, |
||||||||
(in thousands except share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
26,752 |
$ |
7,789 |
||||
Investments |
36,567 |
9,271 |
||||||
Receivables-net of allowances of $641 in 2002 and $400 in 2001 |
15,036 |
11,997 |
||||||
Inventories |
23,946 |
27,293 |
||||||
Income tax receivable |
10,246 |
7,344 |
||||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,708 |
5,707 |
||||||
Other current assets |
1,833 |
2,577 |
||||||
Total Current Assets |
123,088 |
71,978 |
||||||
Property, plant, and equipment |
64,900 |
65,115 |
||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(40,655 |
) |
(35,614 |
) |
||||
Net property, plant, and equipment |
24,245 |
29,501 |
||||||
Other assets |
12,138 |
12,101 |
||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ |
159,471 |
$ |
113,580 |
||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
||||||||
Current: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ |
8,759 |
$ |
9,105 |
||||
Payroll and compensation |
1,020 |
986 |
||||||
Accrued restructuring costs |
4,344 |
-- |
||||||
Retirement costs |
8,928 |
6,758 |
||||||
Income taxes |
3,692 |
3,064 |
||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
486 |
700 |
||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
27,229 |
20,613 |
||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note B) |
||||||||
Stockholders' Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1 par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; |
||||||||
issued and outstanding: none |
-- |
-- |
||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; authorized 60,000,000 shares; |
||||||||
issued and outstanding: 26,103,204 in 2002 and 22,611,204 |
||||||||
in 2001 |
26,103 |
22,611 |
||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
76,405 |
13,878 |
||||||
Treasury stock, $1 par value; 3,840 shares in 2002 and |
||||||||
2,001 |
(232 |
) |
(232 |
) |
||||
Retained earnings |
31,812 |
58,261 |
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,846 |
) |
(1,551 |
) |
||||
Total Stockholders' Equity |
132,242 |
92,967 |
||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
$ |
159,471 |
$ |
113,580 |
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
(in thousands except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
100,241 |
$ |
112,994 |
$ |
253,085 |
||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
73,037 |
75,275 |
131,950 |
|||||||||
Research and development |
14,670 |
16,069 |
16,131 |
|||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
34,918 |
35,075 |
42,421 |
|||||||||
Litigation settlement costs |
2,800 |
-- |
-- |
|||||||||
Restructurings and other charges |
8,714 |
1,047 |
-- |
|||||||||
134,139 |
127,466 |
190,502 |
||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(33,898 |
) |
(14,472 |
) |
62,583 |
|||||||
Joint venture income |
639 |
2,398 |
4,132 |
|||||||||
Interest and other income |
896 |
867 |
1,241 |
|||||||||
(Loss) income before taxes |
(32,363 |
) |
(11,207 |
) |
67,956 |
|||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(12,945 |
) |
(5,267 |
) |
22,086 |
|||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(19,418 |
) |
$ |
(5,940 |
) |
$ |
45,870 |
||||
Net (loss) income per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
2.04 |
||||
Diluted |
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
2.02 |
||||
Number of shares used in per share calculations: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
25,364 |
22,565 |
22,498 |
|||||||||
Diluted |
25,364 |
22,565 |
22,762 |
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accumulated |
||||||||||||||||
Capital |
Other |
Statements of |
||||||||||||||
Par |
in Exess |
Treasury |
Retained |
Comprehensive |
Comprehensive |
|||||||||||
(in thousands except share data) |
Shares |
Value |
of Par |
Stock |
Earnings |
Income (Loss) |
Total |
Income |
||||||||
Balance, December 31, 1999 |
22,375,631 |
$22,376 |
$9,314 |
$(198) |
$39,063 |
$1,068 |
$71,623 |
|||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of tax |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
-- |
-- |
-- |
45,870 |
-- |
45,870 |
$45,870 |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(1,233) |
(1,233) |
(1,233) |
|||||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
investment |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
41 |
41 |
41 |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(1,192) |
(1,192) |
||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$44,678 |
|||||||||||||||
Shares issued for stock options |
235,024 |
235 |
4,083 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
4,318 |
|||||||||
Shares issued for employee savings plan |
-- |
42 |
711 |
-- |
-- |
753 |
||||||||||
Retirement of treasury stock |
(73,451) |
(74) |
(4,361) |
4,435 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|||||||||
Income tax effect from exercise of stock options |
-- |
3,185 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
3,185 |
||||||||||
Shares tendered for exercise of stock options |
-- |
-- |
(5,180) |
-- |
-- |
(5,180) |
||||||||||
Cash dividends |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(10,810) |
-- |
(10,810) |
||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
22,537,204 |
22,537 |
12,263 |
(232) |
74,123 |
(124) |
108,567 |
|||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(5,940) |
-- |
(5,940) |
$(5,940) |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(1,462) |
(1,462) |
(1,462) |
|||||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
investment |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
35 |
35 |
35 |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(1,427) |
(1,427) |
||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$(7,367) |
|||||||||||||||
Shares issued for stock options |
74,000 |
74 |
1,480 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
1,554 |
|||||||||
Income tax effect from exercise of stock options |
-- |
135 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
135 |
||||||||||
Cash dividends |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(9,922) |
-- |
(9,922) |
||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
22,611,204 |
22,611 |
13,878 |
(232) |
58,261 |
(1,551) |
92,967 |
|||||||||
Comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(19,418) |
-- |
(19,418) |
$(19,418) |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(229) |
(229) |
(229) |
|||||||||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
investment |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(66) |
(66) |
(66) |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(295) |
(295) |
||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$(19,713) |
|||||||||||||||
Shares issued for public offering |
3,450,000 |
3,450 |
61,796 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
65,246 |
|||||||||
Shares issued for stock options |
42,000 |
42 |
670 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
712 |
|||||||||
Income tax effect from exercise of stock options |
-- |
61 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
61 |
||||||||||
Cash dividends |
-- |
-- |
-- |
(7,031) |
-- |
(7,031) |
||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
26,103,204 |
$26,103 |
$76,405 |
$(232) |
$31,812 |
$(1,846) |
$132,242 |
|||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(19,418 |
) |
$ |
(5,940 |
) |
$ |
45,870 |
||||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,388 |
5,268 |
4,233 |
|||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(3,001 |
) |
737 |
596 |
||||||||
Undistributed earnings of joint venture, other |
(266 |
) |
(1,643 |
) |
(4,085 |
) |
||||||
Shares issued for employee savings plan |
-- |
-- |
753 |
|||||||||
Income tax effect from exercise of stock options |
61 |
135 |
3,185 |
|||||||||
Noncash asset writedowns and other charges |
6,033 |
-- |
-- |
|||||||||
Net change in other operating assets and liabilities(1) |
3,066 |
10,656 |
(18,672 |
) |
||||||||
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
(7,137 |
) |
9,213 |
31,880 |
||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(5,465 |
) |
(15,944 |
) |
(12,427 |
) |
||||||
Purchase of investments |
(117,255 |
) |
(36,624 |
) |
(42,512 |
) |
||||||
Sale of investments |
89,893 |
44,077 |
41,826 |
|||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(32,827 |
) |
(8,491 |
) |
(13,113 |
) |
||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs |
65,246 |
-- |
-- |
|||||||||
Shares tendered for exercise of stock options |
-- |
-- |
(5,180 |
) |
||||||||
Net cash provided by employee stock plans |
712 |
1,554 |
1,250 |
|||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
(7,031 |
) |
(9,922 |
) |
(10,810 |
) |
||||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
58,927 |
(8,368 |
) |
(14,740 |
) |
|||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
18,963 |
(7,646 |
) |
4,027 |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1 |
7,789 |
15,435 |
11,408 |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, December 31 |
$ |
26,752 |
$ |
7,789 |
$ |
15,435 |
||||||
(1) Change in other operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in receivables |
$ |
(3,039 |
) |
$ |
28,246 |
$ |
(20,764 |
) |
||||
Decrease (increase) in inventories |
1,647 |
2,911 |
(11,762 |
) |
||||||||
Increase in income tax receivable |
(2,902 |
) |
(7,344 |
) |
-- |
|||||||
Decrease (increase) in other current assets |
744 |
(369 |
) |
(582 |
) |
|||||||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable |
(346 |
) |
(8,888 |
) |
9,503 |
|||||||
Increase in accrued restructuring costs |
4,344 |
-- |
-- |
|||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses |
2,618 |
(3,900 |
) |
4,933 |
||||||||
Net change in other operating assets and liabilities |
$ |
3,066 |
$ |
10,656 |
$ |
(18,672 |
) |
|||||
Income taxes paid |
$ |
378 |
$ |
3,929 |
$ |
15,294 |
||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity in 2000 of $3,068,000 was reclassed from other accrued expenses to equity in connection with issuance of stock options. There were no amounts reclassed in 2002 or 2001.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of all intercompany transactions. The investment in and operating results of the Company's 50%-owned joint venture are included on the basis of the equity method of accounting.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, adequacy of reserves, valuation of investments and income taxes. The Company bases these estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various other assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results may differ from our estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates. Revenue and expense accounts are translated at the average rates in effect during the year. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of stockholders' equity. Transaction gains/losses were not material. The effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents was not material.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits, money market accounts, and other highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, and those with greater than three months are considered to be investments. The Company's investments are classified as available-for-sale securities, and the difference in the cost and fair value of these investments is included in other comprehensive income until maturity or sale of the investment at which time it is included in interest and other income. Interest income was $1,025,000 in 2002, $950,000 in 2001 and $1,154,000 in 2000. The Company's investments consist of the following:
December 31, |
|||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
Cost |
Fair Value |
Cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||||
Money market funds |
$ |
-- |
$ |
-- |
$ |
946 |
$ |
946 |
|||||
Municipal bonds, government agencies, |
|||||||||||||
and tax-free bonds |
36,592 |
36,567 |
8,245 |
8,325 |
|||||||||
$ |
36,592 |
$ |
36,567 |
$ |
9,191 |
$ |
9,271 |
||||||
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, short-term foreign exchange contracts, and trade receivables. Cash and cash equivalents are placed with major financial institutions, with high-quality credit ratings. The Company's investments consist of money market funds, municipal government agencies and tax-free bonds or investment-grade securities. The short-term foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into with the Company's primary bank. The Company's customers are concentrated primarily in one industry segment, the semiconductor manufacturing industry, and, historically, a significant portion of the Company's sales have been to a limited number of customers within this industry. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and may require deposits on large orders but does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables.
Inventories
December 31, |
||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
Finished goods |
$ |
8,383 |
$ |
8,570 |
||
Work in process |
12,185 |
13,067 |
||||
Materials and parts |
3,378 |
5,656 |
||||
$ |
23,946 |
$ |
27,293 |
|||
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. Cost includes material, labor and applicable manufacturing and engineering overhead costs. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision to write down excess and obsolete inventory to its estimated net realizable value; if less than cost, based upon management's assumptions of future material usage and obsolescence, which are a result of future demand and market conditions. Total excess and obsolete inventory charges to cost of sales were $2,877,000 in 2002, $421,000 in 2001 and $913,000 in 2000.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment is stated at cost.
December 31, |
||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
Machinery and equipment |
$ |
29,763 |
$ |
28,654 |
||
Computers and equipment |
26,391 |
15,383 |
||||
Leasehold improvements |
7,597 |
9,383 |
||||
Construction in progress |
1,149 |
11,695 |
||||
$ |
64,900 |
$ |
65,115 |
|||
In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company wrote off $1,319,000 of leasehold improvements related to facility reductions and $2,863,000 of in-process internal-use software related to a suspended internal use software development program. The resulting total charge of $4,182,000 was included in restructurings and other charges.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the remaining life of the lease. Estimated useful lives of machinery and equipment, and computers and equipment, are from 3 to 5 years and 3 to 10 years, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and betterments are capitalized. The cost of assets sold or retired and related depreciation are removed from the accounts at the time of sale and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes net sales from product sales upon shipment provided title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, fees are fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Net sales from global support services is recognized as performed or ratably over the period of the related agreements. The Company recognizes net sales from upgrade sales upon customer acceptance provided installation has been completed. As part of a sale, the Company offers customers a warranty on defects in materials and workmanship. The Company continuously monitors and tracks the related product returns and records a provision for the estimated amount of such future returns, based on historical experience and any notification the Company receives of pending returns. While such returns have historically been within the Company's expectations and the provisions established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to experience the same return rates that it has in the past. Any significant increase in material and workmanship defect rates and the resulting credit returns could have a material adverse impact on the Company's operating results for the period or periods in which such returns materialize. The Company also maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances might be required.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized Software Costs
The Company capitalizes internal-use software development costs in accordance with the provisions of SoP 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." The capitalized cost is amortized beginning when it is placed into service on a straight-line basis over its estimated life ranging from 3 to 10 years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. When indicators of impairment are present, the carrying values of the asset are evaluated in relation to the operating performance and future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying business. The net book value of the underlying asset is adjusted to fair value if the sum of the expected discounted cash flows is less than book value. Fair values are based on estimates of market prices and assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates, reflecting varying degrees of perceived risk. The Company recorded $2,863,000 of impairment charges related to the suspension of an internal-use software development program in 2002.
Stock Compensation
Employee stock awards under the Company's and its subsidiaries' compensation plans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," (APB 25) and related interpretations. The Company provides the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," (SFAS 123) and related interpretations.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of revenues and expenses between financial statements and tax returns. Tax credits are recognized when realized for tax purposes using the "flow-through" method of accounting. The Company has not provided for federal income taxes applicable to undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries and its 50%-owned joint venture since these earnings are indefinitely reinvested. The Company assesses the need for a valuation allowance at each balance sheet date based on all available evidence.
Net (Loss) Income Per Share
Basic net (loss) income per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net (loss) income per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options were exercised and converted into common stock at the beginning of the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share:
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
(in thousands except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(19,418 |
) |
$ |
(5,940 |
) |
$ |
45,870 |
||||
Basic shares |
25,364 |
22,565 |
22,498 |
|||||||||
Add: Common equivalent shares (1) |
-- |
-- |
264 |
|||||||||
Diluted shares |
25,364 |
22,565 |
22,762 |
|||||||||
Basic net (loss) income per share |
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
2.04 |
||||
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
2.02 |
||||
(1) Common equivalent shares represent shares issuable upon exercise of stock options (using the treasury stock method). For 2002 and 2001, the Company had 619,000 and 468,000 options outstanding, respectively, not included in the computation of diluted shares. The Company was in a net loss position, and the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2000, 80,000 options outstanding were not included in the computation, because the option price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.
B. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(in thousands) |
Operating Leases |
|||
2,003 |
$ 4,903 |
|||
2,004 |
4,214 |
|||
2,005 |
3,172 |
|||
2,006 |
1,705 |
|||
2,007 |
653 |
|||
Later years |
5,015 |
|||
Total |
$19,662 |
|||
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
B. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
D. INCOME TAXES
The components of (loss) income before income taxes and the related (benefit from) provision for income taxes are presented below:
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
$ |
(11,281 |
) |
$ |
66,906 |
||||
Foreign |
1,083 |
74 |
1,050 |
|||||||||
$ |
(32,363 |
) |
$ |
(11,207 |
) |
$ |
67,956 |
|||||
Income tax (benefit) provision: |
||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ |
(10,504 |
) |
$ |
(6,123 |
) |
$ |
18,271 |
||||
Foreign |
425 |
22 |
748 |
|||||||||
State |
135 |
97 |
2,471 |
|||||||||
(9,944 |
) |
(6,004 |
) |
21,490 |
||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(2,135 |
) |
587 |
400 |
||||||||
State |
(866 |
) |
150 |
196 |
||||||||
(3,001 |
) |
737 |
596 |
|||||||||
Total |
$ |
(12,945 |
) |
$ |
(5,267 |
) |
$ |
22,086 |
||||
The Company's deferred tax assets and (liabilities) are comprised of the following:
December 31, |
||||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Inventory valuation |
$ |
1,819 |
$ |
2,198 |
||||
Compensation and benefit plans |
3,370 |
2,636 |
||||||
Leases |
101 |
138 |
||||||
Depreciation |
-- |
435 |
||||||
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards |
1,711 |
95 |
||||||
Restructuring costs |
2,653 |
-- |
||||||
Other |
338 |
259 |
||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
9,992 |
5,761 |
||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
(1,239 |
) |
-- |
|||||
Other |
(45 |
) |
(54 |
) |
||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(1,284 |
) |
(54 |
) |
||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ |
8,708 |
$ |
5,707 |
||||
Deferred income taxes on undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries are not material. The Company believes that its deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable; therefore, no valuation allowance is required.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
D. INCOME TAXES (continued)
The table below reconciles the expected U.S. federal income tax (benefit) provision to the recorded income tax (benefit) provision in the statements of operations:
December 31, |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
Federal tax computed at statutory rate of 35% |
$ |
(11,327 |
) |
$ |
(3,923 |
) |
$ |
23,785 |
||||
State income taxes, net of federal income tax |
||||||||||||
Benefit |
(811 |
) |
160 |
1,733 |
||||||||
Foreign sales corporation tax benefit |
-- |
-- |
(1,508 |
) |
||||||||
Foreign earnings not subject to U.S. income |
||||||||||||
Taxes |
(70 |
) |
(575 |
) |
(1,127 |
) |
||||||
R&D and foreign tax credits |
(400 |
) |
(400 |
) |
(1,150 |
) |
||||||
Other, net |
(337 |
) |
(529 |
) |
353 |
|||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
$ |
(12,945 |
) |
$ |
(5,267 |
) |
$ |
22,086 |
||||
E. CAPITAL STOCK
Options Outstanding |
Options Exercisable |
|||||||||
Range of |
Weighted Average |
Weighted |
Weighted |
|||||||
Exercise |
Number |
Remaining |
Average |
Number |
Average |
|||||
Prices |
Outstanding |
Contractual Life |
Exercise Price |
Exercisable |
Exercise Price |
|||||
$ 8.17 - $20.10 |
270,750 |
8.32 years |
$16.35 |
49,250 |
$16.25 |
|||||
$20.81 - $20.81 |
227,750 |
4.77 years |
$20.81 |
89,000 |
$20.81 |
|||||
$23.11 - $28.83 |
110,500 |
7.12 years |
$25.92 |
58,125 |
$24.42 |
|||||
$65.97 - $65.97 |
10,000 |
7.15 years |
$65.97 |
5,000 |
$65.97 |
|||||
$ 8.17 - $65.97 |
619,000 |
6.78 years |
$20.50 |
201,375 |
$21.86 |
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
E. CAPITAL STOCK (continued)
The following table summarizes option activity for the years ended 2000, 2001, and 2002:
Number of |
Weighted Average |
||||||
Options Outstanding |
Common Shares |
Exercise Price |
|||||
January 1, 2000 |
772,274 |
$16.95 |
|||||
Options granted |
40,000 |
$55.95 |
|||||
Options exercised |
(235,024 |
) |
$ 7.54 |
||||
Options canceled |
(32,375 |
) |
$24.60 |
||||
December 31, 2000 |
544,875 |
$23.42 |
|||||
Options granted |
98,500 |
$27.79 |
|||||
Options exercised |
(74,000 |
) |
$21.01 |
||||
Options canceled |
(101,000 |
) |
$33.84 |
||||
December 31, 2001 |
468,375 |
$22.47 |
|||||
Options granted |
235,000 |
$16.93 |
|||||
Options exercised |
(42,000 |
) |
$16.95 |
||||
Options canceled |
(42,375 |
) |
$25.99 |
||||
December 31, 2002 |
619,000 |
$20.50 |
|||||
The Company adopted the disclosure-only option under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." If the accounting provisions of SFAS 123 had been adopted, the effect on net (loss) income and basic and diluted net (loss) income per share would have been as follows:
For the years ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
(in thousands except per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
As Reported |
||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(19,418 |
) |
$ |
(5,940 |
) |
$ |
45,870 |
||||
Basic net (loss) income per share |
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
2.04 |
||||
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
$ |
(0.77 |
) |
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
$ |
2.02 |
||||
Pro Forma |
||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ |
(20,066 |
) |
$ |
(6,447 |
) |
$ |
45,023 |
||||
Basic net (loss) income per share |
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
$ |
2.00 |
||||
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
$ |
1.98 |
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
E. CAPITAL STOCK (continued)
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2002, 2001, and 2000 was $8.52, $14.80 and $31.96, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Dividend yield |
2.1 |
% |
1.8 |
% |
1.2 |
% |
|||
Expected stock price volatility |
59 |
% |
60 |
% |
60 |
% |
|||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.49 |
% |
5.13 |
% |
6.38 |
% |
|||
Expected holding period (years) |
6.3 |
6.4 |
6.2 |
F. OTHER ASSETS
The Company owns 50% of a joint venture company, Ulvac Cryogenics, Inc., with an unrelated Japanese manufacturer to produce cryogenic vacuum pumps in Japan.
Condensed results of operations for the joint venture for each of the three fiscal years ended September 30 are as follows:
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
21,256 |
$ |
36,233 |
$ |
46,199 |
||||||
Gross profit |
$ |
5,133 |
$ |
11,294 |
$ |
16,511 |
||||||
Net income |
$ |
399 |
$ |
3,284 |
$ |
6,443 |
||||||
Helix joint venture income, including royalty income |
||||||||||||
and equity income |
$ |
639 |
$ |
2,398 |
$ |
4,132 |
||||||
Condensed balance sheet information as of September 30 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Current assets |
$ |
26,257 |
$ |
29,690 |
||||
Noncurrent assets |
5,606 |
5,994 |
||||||
Total assets |
$ |
31,863 |
$ |
35,684 |
||||
Current liabilities |
$ |
7,546 |
$ |
12,152 |
||||
Long-term liabilities |
1,980 |
1,248 |
||||||
Stockholders' equity |
22,337 |
22,284 |
||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ |
31,863 |
$ |
35,684 |
||||
The Company's net investment in the joint venture of approximately $11,169,000 and $11,142,000 at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, is reported in other assets. The Company's net investment at December 31, 2002 and 2001, reflects a cumulative translation loss of $318,000 and $254,000, respectively. This currency translation loss, which is included in stockholders' equity, resulted from translating the balance sheet of the joint venture into U.S. dollars.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
G. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Line of Business and Foreign Operations
The Company operates in one reportable segment: the development, manufacture, sale, and support of cryogenic and vacuum equipment. The Company's management currently uses consolidated financial information in determining how to allocate resources and assess performance.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of wholly owned international subsidiaries that operate customer support facilities to sell and service products manufactured in the United States. A summary of United States and international operations follows for the years ended December 31:
United |
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
States |
International |
Consolidated |
|||||||
2002 |
||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
76,228 |
$ |
24,013 |
$ |
100,241 |
||||
Long-lived assets |
$ |
32,647 |
$ |
3,736 |
$ |
36,383 |
||||
2001 |
||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
87,418 |
$ |
25,576 |
$ |
112,994 |
||||
Long-lived assets |
$ |
37,114 |
$ |
4,488 |
$ |
41,602 |
||||
2000 |
||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
217,885 |
$ |
35,200 |
$ |
253,085 |
||||
Long-lived assets |
$ |
27,531 |
$ |
3,249 |
$ |
30,780 |
Export Sales and Significant Customers
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
H. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
The following tables set forth the funded status of the defined benefit pension plan and the amount reflected in the Company's consolidated balance sheets, projected benefit obligation, and fair value of assets of the plan.
Reconciliation of Funded Status
December 31, |
||||||||
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Funded status |
$ |
(8,391 |
) |
$ |
(2,715 |
) |
||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
116 |
17 |
||||||
Unrecognized net transition asset |
(27 |
) |
(66 |
) |
||||
Unrecognized net actuarial gain |
1,171 |
(2,618 |
) |
|||||
Accrued pension cost |
$ |
(7,131 |
) |
$ |
(5,382 |
) |
||
Reconciliation of Projected Benefit Obligation
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
Benefit obligation January 1 |
$ |
10,490 |
$ |
7,986 |
|||||
Service cost |
1,615 |
1,401 |
|||||||
Interest cost |
902 |
693 |
|||||||
Plan amendments |
114 |
-- |
|||||||
Actuarial loss |
3,566 |
1,300 |
|||||||
Benefits paid |
(502 |
) |
(652 |
) |
|||||
Settlements or curtailments |
(1,521 |
) |
(238 |
) |
|||||
Benefit obligation December 31 |
$ |
14,664 |
$ |
10,490 |
|||||
Reconciliation of Fair Value of Assets
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Fair Value of assets January 1 |
$ |
7,775 |
$ |
8,930 |
||||
Actual return on plan assets |
(1,000 |
) |
(503 |
) |
||||
Benefits paid |
(502 |
) |
(652 |
) |
||||
Fair value of assets December 31 |
$ |
6,273 |
$ |
7,775 |
||||
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
H. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
(in thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
Service cost |
$ |
1,615 |
$ |
1,401 |
$ |
1,146 |
||||||
Interest cost |
902 |
693 |
574 |
|||||||||
Expected return on assets |
(669 |
) |
(669 |
) |
(611 |
) |
||||||
Net amortization of: |
||||||||||||
Prior service cost |
16 |
7 |
7 |
|||||||||
Net actuarial gain |
(75 |
) |
(156 |
) |
(291 |
) |
||||||
Transition obligation |
(39 |
) |
(39 |
) |
(39 |
) |
||||||
Curtailment gain |
-- |
(236 |
) |
-- |
||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ |
1,750 |
$ |
1,001 |
$ |
786 |
||||||
Key assumptions used in computing year-end obligations for the defined benefit plan were:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Discount rate for obligations |
6.75 |
% |
7.25 |
% |
7.50 |
% |
|||
Rate of compensation increase |
4.25 |
% |
5.00 |
% |
5.00 |
% |
|||
Long-term rate of return on assets |
9.00 |
% |
9.00 |
% |
9.00 |
% |
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
I. RESTRUCTURINGS AND OTHER CHARGES (continued)
The $2,805,000 of net exit costs related to facility closures resulted from the planned consolidation of customer support facilities located in Massachusetts; facility reductions of satellite sales and customer support facilities located in Texas, Arizona, and California; and consolidation of sales and service centers located in Japan. These accrued costs reflect payments required under operating lease contracts in excess of expected sub-lease rentals and costs for writing down related leasehold improvements at the affected facilities. The consolidation of these facilities is expected to result in quarterly cost savings of approximately $400,000.
The Company suspended an internal-use software development program given current market conditions and timing of market application, resulting in a $2,863,000 charge.
During the third quarter of 2001, the Company implemented and completed a restructuring program that resulted in the reduction of approximately 110 employees in an initial response to the slowdown in the semiconductor capital equipment industry. As a result, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $1,047,000 primarily related to severance and fringe benefits costs.
The following table summarizes the components of the restructurings and other charges, the cash payments, non-cash activities, and the remaining accrual as of December 31, 2002:
Employee |
|||||||||||||
Severance |
|||||||||||||
and Fringe |
Facility |
Asset |
Total |
||||||||||
Benefit |
Closure |
Write- |
Restructurings |
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
Costs |
Costs |
Downs |
and Other Charges |
|||||||||
2001 restructuring charges |
$ |
1,047 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
-- |
$ |
1,047 |
|||||
Cash payments in 2001 |
(1,047 |
) |
-- |
-- |
(1,047) |
||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|||||||||
2002 restructuring charges |
3,046 |
1,486 |
4,182 |
8,714 |
|||||||||
Non-cash activity |
-- |
20 |
(4,182 |
) |
(4,162) |
||||||||
Cash payments in 2002 |
(208 |
) |
-- |
-- |
(208) |
||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
$ |
2,838 |
$ |
1,506 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
4,344 |
|||||
J. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
J. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (continued)
In December 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 (SFAS 123)," which is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, with early adoption permitted. SFAS 148 will enable companies that choose to adopt the preferable fair value based method to report the full effect of employee stock options in their financial statements immediately upon adoption, and to make available to investors better and more frequent disclosure about the cost of employee stock options. The Company will continue to apply the disclosure only provisions of both SFAS 123 and SFAS 148.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 (in thousands)
Additions |
|||||||||||||||
Balance at |
Charged to |
Charged to |
Deductions |
Balance at |
|||||||||||
Beginning |
Costs and |
Other |
From |
End |
|||||||||||
Description |
of Period |
Expenses |
Accounts |
Reserves |
of Period |
||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ |
400 |
$ |
318 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
77 |
$ |
641 |
|||||
Reserve for restructuring activities |
$ |
-- |
$ |
8,714 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
4,370 |
$ |
4,344 |
|||||
Year ended December 31, 2001 |
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ |
197 |
$ |
328 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
125 |
$ |
400 |
|||||
Reserve for restructuring activities |
$ |
-- |
$ |
1,047 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
1,047 |
$ |
-- |
|||||
Year ended December 31, 2000 |
|||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ |
185 |
$ |
100 |
$ |
-- |
$ |
88 |
$ |
197 |
|||||
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
Officers are elected annually by the Board and serve at the discretion of the Board.
Part I. Item 1A, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated into this Item 10 by reference.
Additional information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC in March 2003 pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC in March 2003, pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC in March 2003, pursuant to Regulation 14A.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
There were no related-party transactions.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) within 90 days of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that the evaluating officers timely received the information that we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Act.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no significant changes in our internal controls, or, to our knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) |
1. |
Financial Statements. |
||
The Consolidated Financial Statements are listed under Item 8 of |
||||
this report. |
||||
2. |
Financial Statement Schedules. |
|||
The required Financial Statement Schedules are listed under Item 8 |
||||
of this report. |
||||
3. |
Exhibits. |
|||
The Exhibits filed as part of this report are listed on the Exhibit |
||||
Index immediately preceeding the exhibits, which Exhibit Index is incorporated |
||||
herein by reference. |
||||
(b) |
The Company did not file any Current Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter |
|||
ended December 31, 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 30th day of January 2003.
|
|
Helix Technology Corporation (Registrant) |
By: /s/ Robert J. Lepofsky |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on this 30th day of January 2003, in the capacities indicated.
|
Signatures |
Titles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert J. Lepofsky Robert J. Lepofsky |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Jay Zager Jay Zager |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/Teodor Klowan, Jr. |
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
/s/Gideon Argov Gideon Argov |
Director |
|
/s/Arthur R. Buckland |
Director |
|
|
|
|
/s/Frank Gabron Frank Gabron |
Director |
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert H. Hayes Robert H. Hayes |
Director |
|
|
|
|
/s/Robert J. Lepofsky Robert J. Lepofsky |
Director |
|
|
|
|
/s/Marvin G. Schorr Marvin G. Schorr |
Director and Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
/s/Mark S. Wrighton Mark S. Wrighton |
Director |
|
|
|
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert J. Lepofsky, certify that: |
||||
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Helix Technology Corporation; |
||
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
||
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
||
4. |
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
||
|
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
|
c) |
|
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. |
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
||
|
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and |
6. |
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
January 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT J. LEPOFSKY |
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Lepofsky |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION
I, Jay Zager, certify that: |
||||
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Helix Technology Corporation; |
||
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
||
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
||
4. |
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
||
|
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
|
c) |
|
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. |
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
||
|
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and |
6. |
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
January 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAY ZAGER |
|
|
|
|
Jay Zager |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief |
|
|
|
|
Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
2.1 |
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 16, 1998, among Helix Technology Corporation, Helix Acquisition |
Corporation, Granville-Phillips Company, and certain principal stockholders of Granville-Phillips Company. Filed as |
|
Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
2.2 |
Escrow Agreement dated May 7, 1998. Filed as Exhibit 2.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 1998 |
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3.1 |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended on May 7, 1987, May 18, 1988, April 20, 1995 and April 29, 1998. Filed as |
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
3.2 |
Bylaws, as amended through December 9, 1987. Filed herewith. |
10.1 |
Basic agreement between the Company and Ulvac Corporation dated August 17, 1981. Filed as Exhibit 10.13 to a Registration |
Statement on Form S-2, Registration No. 2-84880, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.2 |
Lease agreement dated July 24, 1984, as amended July 26, 1999, between Long Gate LLC as Lessor and the Company as |
Lessee. Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by |
|
reference. |
|
10.3 |
Lease agreement dated May 23, 1991, between Mansfield Corporate Center Limited Partnership as Lessor and the Company |
as Lessee. Filed as Exhibit 10-(14) to the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1991 and incorporated |
|
herein by reference. |
|
10.4 |
Lease agreement dated August 7, 1998, between Mitsubishi Jisho Co., Ltd. as Lessor and the Company as Lessee. Filed as |
Exhibit 10-(5) to the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.5 |
Lease agreement dated May 14, 1999, between MUM IV, LLC as Lessor and the Company as Lessee. Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to |
the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
10.6 |
The Company's informal incentive bonus plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to a Registration Statement on Form S-2, Registration |
No. 2-84880 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
10.7 |
The Company's Supplemental Key Executive Retirement Plan effective February 13, 1992. Filed as Exhibit 14-(14) to the |
Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1992 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
10.8 |
The Company's 1996 Equity Incentive Plan. Included as Exhibit A to the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement on |
Schedule 14-A filed on March 25, 1996 for its 1996 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 24, 1996 and incorporated |
|
herein by reference.* |
|
10.9 |
The Company's Supplemental Benefit Plan of Helix Technology Corporation, effective April 1, 1999. Filed as Exhibit 10.15 |
to the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
10.10 |
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan. Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, |
2001 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
10.11 |
The Company's Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors. Filed as Exhibit 10.11 to |
the Company's Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
10.12 |
Employment Agreement dated February 11, 1999 between the Company and Robert J. Lepofsky. Filed as Exhibit 10-(1) to |
the Company's Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended April 12, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference.* |
|
10.13 |
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2002, between the Company and Robert E. Anastasi (supersedes all other prior |
Agreements). Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 27, 2002 and incorporated |
|
herein by reference.* |
|
10.14 |
Employment Agreement dated August 9, 2002, between the Company and Jay Zager. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's |
Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 27, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.*. |
|
10.15 |
Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2002 between the Company and Mark E. Jalbert. Filed herewith.* |
10.16 |
Employment Agreement dated December 9, 2002 between the Company and James Gentilcore. Filed herewith.* |
21.1 |
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Filed herewith. |
23.1 |
Consent of Independent Accountants. Filed herewith. |
99.1 |
Important Factors That May Affect Future Results. Filed herewith. |
* Denotes management contract or compensation plan.
EXHIBIT 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
|
|
Subsidiary |
Place Organized |
|
|
|
|
Helix Securities Corporation |
Massachusetts |
CTI-Cryogenics, Inc. |
Barbados |
Helix Technology UK Limited |
England |
Helix Technology SA |
France |
Helix Technology GmbH |
Germany |
Helix Technology K.K. |
Japan |
Granville-Phillips Company |
Delaware |
Helix Vacuum Technology Ltd. |
Taiwan |
Helix Technology Limited |
China (Hong Kong) |
CTI-Nuclear, Inc. |
Ohio |
Helix Technology (Shanghai) Limited |
China |
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-09245 and 333-09247) of Helix Technology Corporation of our report dated January 23, 2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 30, 2003
EXHIBIT 99.1
Important Factors That May Affect Future Results
From time to time, we may make forward-looking public statements, such as statements concerning our strategic plans; the outlook for our business and industry; anticipated expenses; anticipated sources of future revenues; and the sufficiency of capital to meet working capital and capital expenditure requirements, as well as other estimates relating to future operations. Forward-looking statements may be in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), in press releases or in informal statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer. The words or phrases "will likely result," "are expected to," "will continue," "is anticipated," "estimate," "project," "believe," "could," "intend," "may," "opportunity," "plan," "potential" or similar terms and expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as enacted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
We wish to caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date on which they are made. In addition, we wish to advise you that the factors listed below, as well as other factors we have not currently identified, could affect our financial or other performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods or events in any current statement.
We will not undertake and we specifically decline any obligation to publicly release revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect either circumstances after the date of the statements or the occurrence of events that may cause us to reevaluate our forward-looking statements.
In connection with the "Safe Harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are hereby filing the following cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf:
The semiconductor equipment industry is highly cyclical and is currently experiencing a severe, prolonged downturn.
The semiconductor equipment industry is characterized by up and down business cycles; the timing, length and volatility of which are difficult to predict. Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, which in turn depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing integrated circuits. Sudden changes in demand for semiconductors have affected and will continue to affect the timing and amounts of our customers' capital equipment purchases and investments in new technology. The semiconductor industry is currently experiencing a severe and prolonged downturn, creating pressure on our net sales, gross margin, net income and cash flow.
Oversupply in the semiconductor industry may reduce demand for capital equipment, including our products.
Inventory buildups in telecommunications equipment, consumer electronics, personal computers and wireless communications devices have dramatically decreased demand for integrated circuits. As a result, the semiconductor industry is currently experiencing a period of oversupply of semiconductors. This oversupply has caused semiconductor manufacturers to reevaluate their capital spending plans, which has resulted in significantly reduced demand for capital equipment, including systems such as ours. A number of our customers have reduced, delayed or canceled their capital expenditures, which has harmed our results of operations. For example, in 2002 our net sales declined by approximately $12.8 million, or 11.3%, from the prior year. Our future success will depend in large part on the resurgence of various electronics industries that use semiconductors, and we cannot predict whether or when demand for integrated circuits will improve.
We derive a significant portion of our sales from a limited number of customers, and our sales could decline significantly if we lose a customer or if a customer cancels, reduces or delays an order.
Historically, we have derived a significant portion of net sales from a limited number of customers. In 2002 our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 43% of our net sales and a single customer, Applied Materials, accounted for approximately 27% of our net sales. We anticipate that a small number of customers will continue to account for a large portion of our net sales for the foreseeable future. The loss, reduction or delay of any orders from these customers could significantly reduce our sales and harm our reputation in our industry.
Industry consolidation and outsourcing of the manufacture of semiconductors may reduce the number of our potential customers.
The substantial expense of building, upgrading or expanding a semiconductor fabrication facility is increasingly causing semiconductor companies to contract with foundries, which manufacture semiconductors designed by others. As manufacturing shifts to foundries, the number of our potential customers could decrease, which would increase our dependence on our remaining customers. In addition, consolidation within the semiconductor manufacturing industry is increasing. If semiconductor manufacturing is consolidated within a small number of foundries and other large companies, our failure to win any significant contracts to supply equipment to any of those customers could seriously harm our reputation and materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, industry consolidation may cause delays in the purchase of our products and cause a reexamination of strategic and purchasing decisions by our current and potential customers. We could lose valuable relationships with key personnel of a customer due to budget cuts, layoffs or other disruptions caused by industry consolidation.
If we fail to develop and sell new or enhanced products and services for semiconductor manufacturers, we will not be able to compete effectively.
Rapid technological innovation in semiconductor manufacturing processes requires the semiconductor equipment industry to anticipate or respond quickly to evolving customer requirements and could render our current product offerings obsolete. We believe that our continued success will depend significantly on our ability to quickly develop, manufacture and introduce new products and product enhancements that address our customers' needs, including their customer support requirements. The timely development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing or other difficulties that could delay or prevent the development, introduction or commercialization of any new or enhanced products. We may not anticipate successfully and accurately technological or market trends, or manage successfully long development cycles. We may be required to collaborate with third parties to develop these products and may not be able to do so on a timely and cost-effective basis, if at all. If we are not successful in marketing and selling these products to customers with whom we have formed long-term relationships, our net sales could be adversely affected. If any of our new or enhanced products have reliability or quality problems, such problems may result in reduced orders, higher manufacturing costs, delays in collecting accounts receivable, and additional service and warranty expense. If we are not able to develop new products or enhancements to existing products on a timely and cost-effective basis, or if the new products or product enhancements that we introduce fail to achieve market acceptance, our ability to grow our business would be harmed and competitors could achieve greater market share.
If we are unable to continue to provide satisfactory levels of maintenance and warranty support to customers, our reputation may be adversely affected, we may be unable to attract new customers and we may lose existing customers.
We provide a high level of customer service and product support to help our customers maximize production yields by minimizing downtime due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance. If our customer service personnel fail to continue to provide prompt and effective product maintenance and warranty support to our customers, or if our diagnostic solutions technology operates at less than the level of performance required to minimize maintenance downtime, then our reputation and the reputation of our products and services could be damaged, which would adversely affect our net sales.
If we fail to compete successfully in the highly competitive semiconductor equipment industry, our sales and profitability will decline.
We encounter aggressive competition in the market for semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Many of our current and potential competitors have greater resources than we have, including capital, name recognition, technical and marketing resources, customer service and support resources, and manufacturing capabilities. We believe that, to remain competitive, we must offer a broad range of products, maintain customer service and support centers worldwide, and invest significant resources in product and process research and development in order to develop new products and enhance our existing products in a timely manner. Competitors with substantially greater resources than we have may be better positioned to compete successfully in the industry.
We expect our current competitors to continue to improve the design and performance of their existing products and processes and to introduce new products and processes with improved price and performance characteristics. Our product sales may be threatened by new technologies, products or market trends, and we may have to adjust the prices of our products and services to stay competitive. In addition, new competitors may emerge in the markets we serve. Moreover, a relatively small number of firms compete in the vacuum technology market. An acquisition of or by, one of our competitors in the sector may result in a substantially strengthened competitor with greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, marketing and customer service and support resources than we have. If our current or future competitors enter into strategic relationships with leading semiconductor manufacturers covering products similar to those sold or being developed by us, our ability to sell products to those manufacturers may be adversely affected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully with our existing competitors or with new competitors.
Downturns in the semiconductor industry make it difficult to anticipate or expand sales.
We anticipate that a significant portion of any new orders will depend upon demand from semiconductor manufacturers that build, upgrade or expand fabrication facilities. If, as a result of an industry downturn, these prospective customers postpone or abandon their plans to build, upgrade or expand fabrication facilities, or otherwise reduce or fail to make capital expenditures, demand for our systems may decline. We may be unable to generate significant new orders for our systems, which would adversely affect our sales levels.
In addition, the high rate of technical innovation in the semiconductor industry requires continual investments in engineering, research and development, marketing and global support services to develop and sell new products and to maintain extensive customer service and support capabilities. These investments create significant fixed costs that limit our ability to reduce expenses during downturns in proportion to declining sales.
We do not have long-term purchase agreements with our customers, and as a result, our customers could stop purchasing our products and services at any time.
We generally do not obtain firm, long-term volume purchase commitments from our customers, and we generally experience short lead-times for customer orders. In addition, customer orders can be canceled and volume levels can be reduced or delayed. We may be unable to replace canceled, delayed, or reduced orders with new business.
Our dependence upon a limited number of suppliers for many components and subassemblies could result in increased costs or delays in the manufacture and sale of our products.
We rely to a substantial extent on outside vendors to manufacture many components and subassemblies for our products. We obtain many of these components and subassemblies from either a sole source or a limited group of suppliers. Because of our reliance on outside vendors generally, and on a limited group of suppliers in some cases, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of required components on a timely basis, at a price and on other terms acceptable to us, or at all.
In addition, we often quote prices to our customers and accept customer orders for our products prior to purchasing components and subassemblies from our suppliers. If our suppliers increase the cost of components or subassemblies, we may not have alternative sources of supply and may not be able to raise the prices of our products to cover all or part of the increased cost of components, which may harm our results of operations.
The manufacture of some of these components and subassemblies is a complex process and requires long lead times. As a result, we have in the past and may in the future experience delays or shortages. If we are unable to obtain adequate and timely deliveries of required components or subassemblies, we may have to seek alternative sources of supply or manufacture these components internally. This could delay our ability to manufacture or to ship our systems on a timely basis, causing us to lose sales, incur additional costs, delay new product introductions and suffer harm to our reputation.
Claims based on defects in our products or errors in performing product-related services could result in costly litigation against us.
Our products and services are used in several key steps in the fabrication of semiconductors, which is a complex and expensive process. As a result, any failure of our systems could interrupt our customers' production schedules, which would result in costly unscheduled downtime. We may be subject to significant liability claims or liquidated damages pursuant to contracts with our customers as a result of any malfunction of our systems. Our insurance may not, or may not be sufficient to, cover us against liability claims or may not continue to be available to us. Liability claims could also require us to spend significant time and money in litigation. As a result, any of these claims, whether or not successful, could seriously damage our reputation and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Sales to foreign markets constituted approximately 35.6% of our net sales in 2002. Therefore our net sales and results of operations could be adversely affected by downturns in economic conditions in countries outside the United States and other risks associated with international operations.
Sales of our products and services to customers outside the United States, including exports from our U.S. facilities, accounted for approximately 35.6% of our net sales in 2002. We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our net sales. We may expand the sales and marketing activities for our products and services to markets outside the United States, particularly the Asia-Pacific market, and hire additional international personnel. Because of our dependence upon international sales, we are subject to a number of risks, including:
- |
Unexpected changes in laws or regulations resulting in more burdensome governmental controls, tariffs, restrictions, embargoes or export license requirements; |
|
|
- |
Difficulties in obtaining required export licenses; |
|
|
- |
Volatility in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
- |
Political and economic instability, particularly in the Asia-Pacific market; |
|
|
- |
Difficulties in accounts receivable collections; |
|
|
- |
Extended payment terms beyond those customarily offered in the United States; |
|
|
- |
Difficulties in managing distributors or representatives outside the United States; |
|
|
- |
Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary operations; and |
|
|
- |
Potentially adverse tax consequences. |
Substantially all of our sales to date have been denominated in U.S. dollars. Our products become less price competitive in countries with currencies that are declining in value in comparison to the dollar. This could cause us to lose sales or force us to lower our prices, which would reduce our gross margins. If it becomes necessary for us to make sales denominated in foreign currencies, we will become more exposed to the risk of currency conversion rate fluctuations.
Our proprietary technology is important to the continued success of our business. Our failure to protect this proprietary technology may significantly impair our competitive position.
Our ability to compete effectively with other companies depends, in part, on our ability to protect our technology assets by obtaining and enforcing patents. We have a number of patents in the United States and other countries and additional applications are pending for new developments in our equipment and processes. Although we seek to protect our intellectual property rights through patents, we cannot be certain that:
- |
We will be able to protect our technology adequately; |
|
|
- |
Competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently; |
|
|
- |
Any of our pending patent applications will be issued; |
|
|
- |
Claims allowed under any issued patents will be broad enough to protect our technology; or |
|
|
- |
Intellectual property laws will protect our intellectual property rights. |
Our competitive position is also dependent upon unpatented trade secrets. Trade secrets are difficult to protect. Our competitors may independently develop proprietary information and techniques that are substantially equivalent to ours or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, such as through unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of our trade secrets.
We may become involved in litigation relating to our intellectual property rights, which may result in substantial expense and may divert our attention from the implementation of our business strategy.
We believe that the success of our business depends, in part, on obtaining patent protection for our key technology, defending our issued patents and preserving our trade secrets. Litigation may be necessary in order to enforce our patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement. These types of litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, litigation may not adequately protect our intellectual property rights.
In addition, we may be sued by third parties that claim our products infringe their intellectual property rights. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that the validity and breadth of claims covered in vacuum technology patents involve complex legal and factual questions. Any litigation or claims against us, whether valid or not, could result in substantial costs, place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert management resources and harm our reputation. Such claims could result in awards of substantial damages, which could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, intellectual property litigation or claims could force us to:
- |
Cease selling, incorporating or using any of our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property, which would adversely affect our net sales; |
|
|
- |
Obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all; and |
|
|
- |
Redesign our products, which would be costly and time-consuming. |
We may not be able to maintain and expand our business if we are not able to retain, hire and integrate additional qualified personnel.
- |
Changes or slowdowns in economic conditions in the semiconductor and semiconductor capital equipment industries and other industries in which our customers operate; |
|
|
- |
The timing and volume of orders placed by major customers; |
|
|
- |
Customer cancellations of previously placed orders and shipment delays; |
|
|
- |
Variations in customers' capital spending budgets or inventory management practices; |
|
|
- |
Our ability to develop, manufacture, introduce and support our current product lines as well as new products and product enhancements; |
|
|
- |
Announcements, new product introductions and reductions in the prices of products offered by our competitors; |
|
|
- |
Our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of sole or limited source components and subassemblies for our products; and |
|
|
- |
Our ability to realize forecasted sales for a particular period. |
Our results of operations in one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of analysts and investors. In those circumstances, the trading price of our common stock would likely decrease.
We may need additional financing in the future, and we may be required to issue additional securities. Any additional financing may result in restrictions on our operations or substantial dilution to our stockholders.
We may need to raise additional funds in the future, for example, to develop new technologies, support our expansion, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or respond to unanticipated situations. We may try to raise additional funds through public or private financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements. Our ability to obtain debt or equity funding will depend on a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and investor interest. Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to revise our business plan to reduce expenditures, including curtailing our growth strategies, foregoing acquisitions or reducing our product development efforts. If we succeed in raising additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible securities, the issuance could result in substantial dilution to existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities or preferred stock, these new securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. The terms of these securities, as well as any borrowings under our credit agreement, could impose restrictions on our operations.
We may be unable to pay dividends in the future.
Our stockholders may receive dividends out of legally available funds if, and when, they are declared by our Board of Directors. Our policy has been to pay dividends out of cash in excess of the needs of the business. Currently, we declare dividends quarterly at a rate of $0.04 per share of common stock. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future that may prohibit or further restrict our ability to declare and pay dividends. We may also be restricted from paying dividends in the future due to restrictions imposed by state corporation laws, our financial condition and results of operations, capital requirements, covenants contained in our financing agreements, management's assessment of future capital needs and other factors considered by our Board of Directors.
The war on terrorism and increasing political and social turmoil, including terrorist and military actions, increase the difficulty for us, our vendors and our customers to forecast accurately and plan future business activities, and could delay the recovery of the semiconductor industry and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
The war on terrorism and recent political and social turmoil can be expected to put further pressure on economic conditions in the United States and worldwide. These political, social and economic conditions make it difficult for us, our suppliers and our customers to forecast accurately and plan future business activities. The recovery of the semiconductor industry could be delayed, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected by a fluctuation in net sales relative to our forecasted value, as we may not be able to vary our incurred expenses in response to net sales actually realized.