Edgar Filing: PERVASIP CORP

pvsp_10k-113010.htm

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________.

Commission File No. 0-4465

PERVASIP CORP.

(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)

New York	13-2511270
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(I.R.S Employer Identification No.)
of Incorporation or Organization)

75 South Broadway, Suite 400, White Plains, New York	10601
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(914) 620-1500

(Issuer’s Telephone Number)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $.10 per share

Check whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding twelve months (or for such shortest time that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x

Check whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates computed based on the closing price of such stock as of May 31, 2010 was approximately $3,674,000.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of March 15, 2011, was 14,501,280.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

PART I

Item 1.	Description of Business
Item 1A.	Risk Factors
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.	Description of Property
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.	Quanitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.	Other Information

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Item 11.	Executive Compensation
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

The statements contained in this Report that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. Management wishes to caution the reader of the forward-looking statements that such statements, which are contained in this Report, reflect our current beliefs with respect to future events and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, but not limited to, economic, competitive, regulatory, technological, key employee, and general business factors affecting our operations, markets, growth, services, products, licenses and other factors discussed in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that these statements are only estimates or predictions. No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of risks facing us, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events. Factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

The availability of additional funds to successfully pursue our business plan;

The cooperation of our lender which has not demanded repayment of our debt that was due in October 2010;

The cooperation of industry service partners that have signed agreements with us;

Our ability to market our services to current and new customers and generate customer demand for our products and services in the geographical areas in which we operate;

The impact of changes the Federal Communications Commission or State Public Service Commissions may make to existing telecommunication laws and regulations, including laws dealing with Internet telephony;

Our ability to comply with provisions of our financing agreements;

The highly competitive nature of our industry;

The acceptance of telephone calls over the Internet by mainstream consumers;

Our ability to retain key personnel;

Our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate;

The impact of adverse tax or regulatory rulings or actions affecting our operations, including the imposition of taxes, fees and penalties;

Our ability to maintain, attract and integrate internal management, technical information and management information systems;

Our ability to manage rapid growth while maintaining adequate controls and procedures;

The availability and maintenance of suitable vendor relationships, in a timely manner, at reasonable cost;

The decrease in telecommunications prices to consumers; and

General economic conditions.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by us in those statements.

These risk factors should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue. All written and oral forward looking statements made in connection with this Report that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Given these uncertainties, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to review or confirm analysts’ expectations or estimates or to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Further, the statements about our intentions contained in this document are statements of our intentions as of the date of this document and are based upon, among other things, the existing regulatory environment, industry conditions, market conditions and prices, the economy in general and our assumptions as of such date. We may change our intentions, at any time and without notice, based upon any changes in such factors, in our assumptions or otherwise.

PART I

In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we will refer to Pervasip Corp., a New York corporation, as “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our.”

Item 1. – Business

Overview

We are a provider of video and voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, telephony services. We provide these services using a proprietary Linux-based, open-source softswitch, which utilizes an Internet Protocol (“IP”) telephony product. IP telephony is the real time transmission of voice communications in the form of digitized “packets” of information over the Internet or a private network, which is analogous to the way in which e-mail and other data is transmitted. We provide our IP telephone services primarily on a wholesale basis to other service providers, such as cable operators, Internet service providers, WiFi and fixed wireless broadband providers, data integrators, value-added resellers, and satellite broadband providers. Our technology also works efficiently over mobile phone networks. In lieu of routing a call from a mobile phone over the voice side of a mobile phone network, we route the call over the data side of the network. The data side of the mobile phone network is simply another avenue upon which we can run our IP telephony services. It is a low-cost method of delivering telephone service. We believe it will attract a significant number of subscribers to our service from the large and expensive mobile phone carriers. We refer to our use of the data-side of mobile phone networks as voice-over-IP enabled mobile phone service (“Mobile VoIP”).

The continued growth in both mobile telephone services and VoIP telephone services has resulted in a new Mobile VoIP market. Adding VoIP to mobile telephone services allows subscribers to make inexpensive calls from their mobile phones instead of using costly airtime minutes. We enable mobile phone users to access this emerging market in two different manners. First, we have an easy-to-download VoIP application that enables users to make low-cost VoIP calls over our IP network all over the world. The application can be downloaded to hundreds of handset models, including Symbian, Windows Mobile, iPhone, Maemo, Android and Palm handsets with 3G or WiFi coverage. The user needs to have a data plan that allows the handset to surf the Internet. Without the data connection, a VoIP application will not work. Second, we offer for sale certain Nokia smart phones with unlimited data, calling and text messaging to the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico. In this case, our service is not downloaded over an existing carrier’s plan. Instead, our service is loaded directly onto the handset before the handset is shipped to the customer. We sell the VoIP application to consumers who are looking to save money on wireless telephone service but do not want to buy a new mobile phone, or decide they cannot buy one because they are in a contract with a mobile service carrier. We sell certain Nokia smart phones with our unlimited service to consumers who are looking for a new mobile phone and do not need to be concerned with contractual obligations to a service carrier. Unlike many of the larger mobile phone service carriers, we do not require a one or two-year contract to sign up for our mobile phone service.

Today we support thousands of active users around the world through our wholesale channel and our direct-to-consumer channel. We have built a privately-managed, state-of-the-art global telecommunications platform using IP technology and we offer a broad suite of private label VoIP products and services, as well as a back-office platform. Our operations management tools include, among others: account provisioning; e-commerce-based payment processing systems; billing and account management; operations management; web development; network management; and customer care. Based on our customizable VoIP solutions, our wholesale customers can offer private label video and voice-over-IP services to their own customer bases under their own brand name, a “white-label” brand (in which no brand name is indicated and different customers can offer the same product), or our own brand, which is VoX Communications. We are able to provide customized solutions that other VoIP providers, with more financial resources, are not able to provide. For example, for customers who use the Ojo Vision Digital Video Phone on our network, we can provide video voice mail, simultaneous ringing (for example, dial one number and ten phones in ten locations ring at the same time), video ads to consumers, photos ads to consumers, and video calling without the one- or two-second delay that other carriers experience. We are able to provide our services at a cost per user that is generally lower than that charged by traditional service providers because we minimize our network costs by using efficient packet-switched technology and interconnecting to a wide variety of termination options, which allows us to benefit from pricing differences between vendors to the same termination points.

Development of Business

We were incorporated in the State of New York in 1964 under the name Sirco Products Co. Inc. and developed a line of high-quality handbags, totes, luggage and sport bags. In 1999, we divested our handbag and luggage operations, which had experienced several years of operating losses

We commenced operations in the telecommunications industry in fiscal 1998 by acquiring a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) that was formed to attract and retain a geographically-concentrated customer base in the metropolitan New York region, primarily through the resale of products and services of incumbent and alternative facilities-based local providers. In 1999, we changed our name to eLEC Communications Corp. to signify our new focus on telecommunications and our vision to run local exchange services over the Internet. In October 2000, we purchased another CLEC, and in November 2002 we started a third CLEC.

Our CLEC operations always leased circuit-switched network elements from other carriers in order to provide wireline services to customers. Although we entered the telephone business in 1998 by leasing wirelines, it was always our intention to use that platform as a stepping-stone on our way to becoming an IP telephone company. Consequently, we sold our wireline business during fiscal 2007. In conjunction with this sale and the shift of our focus to IP telephony, in December 2007, we changed our name to Pervasip Corp. The word Pervasip is a contraction of the phrase “Pervasive IP” and our intention is to be known as a pervasive IP company with a ubiquitous global presence.

In 2004, we incorporated VoX Communications Corp. (“VoX”) as our wholly-owned IP subsidiary to pursue the deployment of our own IP network for IP telephony services. In addition to the general cost advantages of IP telephone service, we believe IP communication technologies will continue to advance rapidly and will further the potential for the Internet to become the preferred medium of communication and commerce. Consequently, since fiscal 2006, we expended a vast amount of our resources on the planning, development and implementation of our IP network.

Although we allow individual users to purchase our digital voice service on the VoX website at http://www.voxcorp.net/, we focused our efforts on becoming a wholesale provider of digital voice services. As a wholesaler, we enable broadband service providers to sell a voice product to their existing customers before a retail VoIP company approaches the broadband customer with its voice product. This wholesale model contains many cost advantages for us, especially with regard to customer acquisition costs. Companies that sell digital voice services on a retail level typically experience significant customer acquisition costs because of the high marketing expenses and special promotions they use to attract an end-user who already has broadband service. We do not incur the expense of retail customer acquisitions, as these costs are borne by our wholesale customers. Our wholesale customers, however, often can attract retail customers in a more cost-effective manner than we can because the wholesale customer already has a customer base of end-users who are utilizing broadband services.

With the launching of our Mobile VoIP product and our video phone service, we anticipate we will change our focus to the retail smart phone consumer. This consumer could be a customer of VoX, or it could be a person who bought a phone and phone service under a different name, but VoX is providing the service. For example, we have signed an agreement with a person-to-person marketing firm to sell the Ojo Vision Digital Video Phone with VoX service to its membership base. This marketing firm decided to sell the phone service as an agent of VoX, in lieu of selling the service under its own brand name, and therefore, the customers it signs up will become direct customers of VoX. In another instance, a carrier that provides primarily international calling services wants to market the video phone under its own brand name, and have VoX push commercials to the video phone screen before and after the phone call is made. If the consumer reacts to the commercials and buys the product, the carrier will reduce the consumer’s telephone bill. In this instance, the customer is not a direct customer of VoX, but is a customer of the international carrier that is using VoX’s VoIP technology.

Available Information

We maintain a corporate website with the address http://www.pervasip.com/ and VoX maintains a corporate website with the address http://www.voxcorp.net/. We have not incorporated by reference into this Report on Form 10-K the information on any of our websites and you should not consider any of such information to be a part of this document. Our website addresses are included in this document for reference only. We make available free of charge through our corporate website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K or 10-KSB, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Form 10-QSB and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports through a link to the EDGAR database as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Business Strategy

Our objective is to build a profitable worldwide video and voice communications IP telephone company on a stable and scalable platform with minimal network costs. We intend to bring the best possible voice and video products and services, at an affordable price, to businesses and residential consumers and enhance the ways in which these customers connect, communicate and collaborate with each other on a worldwide basis. We want to be known for our high quality of service, robust features and ability to deliver any new product to a wholesale customer or a web store without delay.

Specific strategies to accomplish this objective include:

Capitalize on our technology expertise to support new products and features. Our proprietary VoIP technology gives us the ability to offer leading-edge services and control our product development cycle. Our ability to quickly test new IP devices on our network, including video softphones, IPTV, WiFi enabled VoIP phones and Mobile VoIP phones, allows us to continuously offer the best and newest products as they become available. We are not dependent upon one or two device manufacturers, which has resulted in considerable cost savings, greater capacity and flexibility per port, and the ability to provide convergent solutions with new features, services and service creation capabilities in a timely manner.

Focus on offering enhanced calling features to Video calling services. The video phone that we support contains compression technology that allows us to provide real-time video calling with very efficient bandwidth usage. Our ability to customize the video phone to the needs of wholesale customers, such as sending video ads to the phone, allowing simultaneous ringing to more than one video phone, allowing our video customers to make calls to video phones on a competitors’ network, or routing certain calls to a switch specified by the customer, has allowed us to enter discussions and attract customers in several instances where our competitors had no solutions to offer.

Continue to utilize back-office automation. We believe that to achieve our objective we need to have “cradle to grave” automation of our back-office web and billing systems. We have written our software for maximum automation, flexibility and changeability. We know from experience in provisioning complex telecom orders that back-office automation is a key factor in keeping overhead costs low. Technology continues to work for 24 hours a day and we believe that the fewer people a company has in the back office, the more efficiently it can run, which should drive down the cost per order.

Our approach to VoIP does not require expensive network equipment to provide telephony services. Instead we rely on our proprietary software and a “server cluster” or “server farm” architecture. Unlike the typical telecom model where one large expensive machine performs almost every task, we have a server farm comprised of a cluster of Dell servers and Cisco routers, where each machine performs a different task and has from one to three backup machines to ensure that services never go down. By not relying on the equipment and related software of telecom equipment vendors, we are able to control our own destiny and scale without the limitations and delays associated with equipment financing, installation and the integration of new machines and source code updates that equipment vendors impose on VoIP carriers. Our philosophy is that VoIP is an application and should be treated the same way that companies such as Google, Inc. process their data. Consequently, data servers and routers are the appropriate vehicle on which to process our VoIP calls.

Principal Products and Markets

Our IP telephony offerings are tailored to meet the specific needs of unique wholesale customers, Mobile VoIP users and video telephony users. We have focused on marketing to wholesale accounts that have an existing customer base of residential and small business users. We believe we provide compelling product offerings to Mobile VoIP users, Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”), Wireless Internet Service Providers (“WISPs”), CLECs and other broadband service providers, as we enable them to quickly roll out private-labeled broadband voice solutions to their residential and small business customers. Because of the acceptance of our video service, which we have just launched, we believe we will focus the majority of our marketing efforts in fiscal 2011 on selling the video phone and a recurring VoIP service plan. To obtain the service, the customer must enter into a service agreement with us and select a calling plan based on the anticipated use of the service. Service plans provide alternatives for minutes of usage, up to an unlimited amount, at varying rates for calls in the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada that are made to non-VoX customers. Subscribers are charged at a per-minute rate for international calls to non-VoX customers and, depending on the level of plan selected, may be charged for calls to the public switched telephone network if they exceed the minutes allowed under the chosen plan. All of our plans allow for unlimited calling between VoX customers, regardless of their location. Each subscriber is assigned a telephone number in any of the area codes and underlying rate centers currently offered by the service. We currently offer area codes in 48 contiguous U.S. states, Puerto Rico and Canada, along with free number porting from the customer's previous service provider to VoX. All VoX customers receive access to a variety of telephone features, including voice mail, caller ID, call forwarding, call waiting, 3-way calling, online account management and billing, international call blocking and caller ID blocking. We currently offer enhanced 9-1-1, or E-911, service on all VoX calling plans with a United States service address. A VoX E-911 call is routed as 9-1-1 emergency traffic and is accompanied by caller information. Subscribers may also have toll-free numbers (e.g., 800 numbers) or virtual numbers. A virtual number is an additional phone number that will ring through to an existing subscriber line. We offer virtual numbers in all of our U.S. rate centers, as well as in Puerto Rico and Canada. We also offer video over IP service using the Ojo Vision Digital Video Phone product, which includes all of the voice service plans and features described above plus unlimited video calls to any other VoX videophone subscriber anywhere in the world.

Mobile VoIP - TMCnet.com reports on its web site http://www.tmcnet.com/channels/mobile-voip/ that the market for Mobile VoIP is expected to be $32.2 billion by the end of 2013 and that by 2019, half of all mobile calls throughout the world will be made over all-IP networks. According to the analyst firm In-Stat, there will be more than 138 million active mobile VoIP users by 2014. We are offering our Mobile VoIP product, as a downloadable application, on several web sites. We primarily market it as a second line on a consumer’s mobile device, although we do have customers who use an Internet tablet and our Mobile VoIP is their only telephone line. We believe that as consumers adopt Mobile VoIP and transition away from the circuit-switched networks now in use, consumers will find that having a second phone line on their mobile devices will be helpful to distinguish between business and personal calls. Also, a second or third phone line becomes very useful to people who do not want to give out their permanent mobile phone number to someone they have recently met. A Mobile VoIP number from VoX comes with its own voice mail account so the customer with a VoX number can have a professional voice mail message or a personal voice mail greeting, depending on the preferences of the customer.

ISPs - ISPs range in size from small town ISPs to those with several international facilities. This potential customer base has been under considerable pressure of late to offer more services to compete against the major telecom companies and cable companies. Furthermore, we believe ISPs are looking for additional revenue streams as the pricing pressure on Internet access has steadily increased. Many ISPs in the major cities have either sold their client base to larger operators or found a unique niche to stay in business. We believe the secondary and tertiary markets are more likely a better target for our services.

WISPs - From Starbucks and McDonalds to the cities of San Francisco and Philadelphia, wireless Internet access is a powerful force in the broadband market. We estimate there are more than 750 WISPs in the U.S. As with any broadband medium, these providers want to layer on as many applications and additional revenue streams as possible. Although the voice-over-Wi-Fi market is young, Clearwire Corporation and other companies have proven the demand in this market by rolling out voice-over-Wi-Fi and WiMax in several markets in the United States.

Other Broadband Providers - Various other entities provide a broadband service that is suitable for our IP telephony product. We have a satellite broadband provider that uses our VoIP service and has also used our video VoIP calling over its satellite broadband service. We have tested our VoIP service with broadband-over Powerline providers. We are not able to predict at this time the broadband market penetration that these types of entities will obtain. It is possible that broadband-over-powerline and satellite broadband providers will be able to carry our voice product to areas in which cable operators and telephone companies cannot bring their broadband.

Agent and retail sales - Our focus is to serve the wholesale IP telephony market. However, we maintain a web site for retail sales so that agents can promote and sell our product. We also offer a low-cost, toll-free product on a wholesale and retail basis. We have switched hundreds of toll-free telephone numbers to our platform primarily because we can offer a significant per-minute savings to our customers. Many states, such as New Mexico and Arizona, still have in-state rates that are higher than ten cents a minute. We offer in-state rates at 3.9 cents a minute.

Our Network

We operate a sophisticated IP network to deliver our broadband voice services. We carefully monitor the network as it automatically minimizes the route taken by packets carrying a voice conversation, and self-regulates traffic volumes to directly control the quality of service from the origination to the termination of a call. Calls are connected on our network with minimal post-dial delay and our G.729 compression yields virtually no jitter. When compared to other broadband voice carriers or wireline connections, we deliver a high-quality call. Our softswitch utilizes advanced SIP infrastructure on a cluster of SIP servers and has the ability to scale at a low cost. We believe the collective thought process of our SIP servers makes us unique, as our servers are capable of “thinking” about what they are doing and will perform self-healing functions when necessary to ensure a call is not dropped. Unlike many of our competitors, we do not rely on Microsoft to power our softswitch. By using our own open-source software platform, we are able to update the network as needed, avoid the delays of waiting for software upgrades from Microsoft and avert the problems associated with having too much reliance on one vendor in order to run our network.

We consider voice to be an application on an IP transport. Our network does not use the mainframe technology approach that Sonus Networks, Inc. or BroadSoft, Inc. promotes. Instead, we have a fully-scalable, redundant, power-backed stable platform with a server farm that contains no specifically-designed telecom equipment. By not relying on the telecom equipment and related software of the larger equipment vendors, we are able to own and control our own proprietary source code and to scale without the limitations and delays associated with equipment financing, installation, integration and source code updates that equipment vendors impose on other broadband voice carriers.

Competition

The communications industry is highly competitive and the market for enhanced Internet and IP communications services is new and rapidly evolving. We believe the primary competitive factors that will determine our success in the Internet and IP communications market are:

Quality of service

Responsive customer care services

Ability to provide customers with a telephone number in their local calling area

Pricing levels and policies

Ability to provide E911 and 911 service

Bundled service offerings

Innovative features

Ease of use

Accurate billing

Brand recognition

Quality of analog telephone adapter supported by us and used by our customer

Future competition could come from a variety of companies in both the Internet and telecommunications industries. This competition includes major companies that have been in operation for many years and have greater resources and larger subscriber bases than we have, as well as companies operating in the growing market of discount telecommunications services, including calling cards and prepaid cards.

We anticipate that competition also will come from several traditional telecommunications companies, including industry leaders, such as Verizon Communications Inc., AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Deutsche Telekom AG and Qwest Communications International, Inc., as well as established broadband services providers, such as Time Warner Inc., Comcast Corporation and Cablevision Inc. These companies provide enhanced Internet and IP communications services in both the United States and internationally. All of these competitors are significantly larger than we are and have:

substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources;

stronger name recognition and customer loyalty;

well-established relationships with many of our target customers;

larger networks; and

large existing user bases to cross sell new services.

These and other competitors may be able to bundle services and products that are not offered by us together with enhanced Internet and IP communications services, which could place us at a significant competitive disadvantage. Many of our competitors enjoy economies of scale that can result in a lower cost structure for transmission and related costs, which could cause significant pricing pressures within the industry.

Major Customer

We had one customer that accounted for 23% of our revenues in fiscal 2010 and a different customer that accounted for 34% of our revenues in fiscal 2009. In January 2010, the major customer in fiscal 2009 moved its lines to a larger competitor of ours. Loss of this account adversely affected our revenues and results of operations, as it represented approximately $63,000 in monthly revenues. Although we have not yet been able to replace the lost revenues, we were successful in fiscal 2010 in replacing substantially all the gross profit dollars that were generated by the former major customer.

Government Regulation

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has jurisdiction over all U.S. telecommunications common carriers to the extent they provide interstate or international communications services, including the use of local networks to originate or terminate such services. The FCC also has jurisdiction over certain issues relating to interconnection between providers of local exchange service and the provision of service via fixed wireless spectrum.

The use of the Internet and private IP networks to provide voice communication services is a relatively recent market development. Although the provision of such services is currently permitted by United States law and largely unregulated within the United States, several foreign governments have adopted laws and/or regulations that could restrict or prohibit the provision of voice communication services over the Internet or private IP networks. More aggressive regulation of the Internet in general, and Internet telephony providers and services specifically, may materially and adversely affect our business.

On March 10, 2004, the FCC initiated a broad rulemaking proceeding concerning the provision of voice and other services and applications utilizing IP technology. The FCC’s generic rulemaking proceeding could result in the FCC determining, for instance, that certain types of Internet telephony should be regulated like landline telecommunications services. Thus, Internet telephony would no longer be exempt from more onerous telecommunications-related regulatory obligations, or other economic regulations typically imposed on traditional telecommunications carriers.

In June 2005, the FCC adopted rules requiring providers of broadband voice services to provide 911 emergency access. We believe we are in compliance with this order. In August 2005, the FCC adopted rules that these providers must design their systems to facilitate authorized wiretaps pursuant to the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act. We anticipate that we will continue to develop technologies as required by governmental regulation that support emergency access and enhanced services. We believe that almost all digital voice providers have difficulty in achieving full compliance within the stated deadlines due to the level of complexity and cost of some of the requirements. We find that we in a position similar to our peers in the industry, where a strict interpretation of an FCC order could lead to an enforcement action including fines or an order to cease and desist marketing a certain service in a certain area where we do not have full compliance.

In June 2006, the FCC announced that interconnected digital voice providers, such as VoX, would be required to contribute to the Universal Service Fund (“USF”) on an interim basis, beginning October 2006. The FCC permitted interconnected digital voice providers to determine their USF contribution according to one of three different calculation methods. Implementation of the regulatory requirements compelled by the FCC’s action take considerable time and cost, and we cannot guarantee that we have implemented these requirements fully. If we fail to report our revenue and remit USF on that revenue accurately, we may be subject to late fees, penalties or other actions, which could negatively affect our business.

In April 2007, the FCC released its order extending the application of the customer proprietary network information (“CPNI”) rules to interconnected VoIP providers. CPNI includes information such as the telephone numbers called by a consumer; the frequency, duration and timing of such calls; and any services and features purchased by the consumer, such as call waiting, call forwarding and caller ID.

Under the FCC’s existing rules, carriers may not use CPNI without customer approval except in circumstances related to their provision of existing services, and must comply with detailed customer approval processes when using CPNI outside of these circumstances. The new CPNI requirements are aimed at establishing more stringent security measures for access to a customer’s CPNI data in the form of enhanced passwords for on-line access and call-in access to account information as well as customer notification of account or password changes.

On August 6, 2007 and effective November 2007, the FCC adopted an Order concerning the collection of regulatory fees requiring the collection of such fees from interconnected VoIP providers. Interconnected VoIP providers pay regulatory fees based on interstate and international revenues. The Regulatory Fees Order became effective in November 2007.

On November 8, 2007, the FCC released an Order relating to local number portability imposing local number portability and related obligations on interconnected VoIP Providers like us. The Order requires interconnected VoIP providers to contribute to shared numbering administration costs. Additionally, the Order mandates that we port telephone numbers within certain timeframes. As a result of the steps we have taken, we believe that we comply with the FCC’s order regarding local number portability.

The FCC is considering enhancing proposed reforms of the intercarrier compensation system, which is a set of FCC rules and regulations by which telecommunications carriers compensate each other for the use of their respective networks. These rules and regulations affect the prices we pay to our suppliers for access to the facilities and services that they provide to us, such as termination of calls by our customers onto the public switched telephone network (“PSTN”). In addition, proceedings have been initiated to determine what intercarrier compensation charges should apply to the termination of VoIP traffic. We currently operate under various commercial agreements with carriers who complete calls from our customers to the PSTN. We cannot predict what, if any, intercarrier compensation regulations the FCC’s order may impose on VoIP providers.

Other action by the FCC has expanded the possibility that our digital voice services may become subject to state regulation, which will likely lead to higher costs and reduce some of the competitive advantage digital voice services hold over traditional telecommunications services.

Some state and local regulatory authorities believe they retain jurisdiction to regulate the provision of, and impose taxes, fees and surcharges on, intrastate Internet and VoIP telephony services, and have attempted to impose such taxes, fees and surcharges, such as a fee for providing E-911 service. Rulings by the state commissions on the regulatory considerations affecting Internet and IP telephony services could affect our operations and revenues, and we cannot predict whether state commissions will be permitted to regulate the services we offer in the future.

In addition, it is possible that we will be required to collect and remit taxes, fees and surcharges in other states and local jurisdictions for virtual data products, based upon a billing address or phone number of a VoIP customer and such authorities may take the position that we should have collected such taxes, fees and surcharges even though we did not. If so, they may seek to collect those past taxes, fees and surcharges from us and impose fines, penalties or interest charges on us. Our payment of these past taxes, fees and surcharges, as well as penalties and interest charges, could have a material adverse effect on us.

Employees

As of February 28, 2011, we had nine employees. We are not subject to any collective bargaining agreement and we believe our relationship with our employees is good. In conjunction with a financing on February 18, 2009, our lender required us to eliminate our entire sales force and various other employees. We continued to operate our business and improve our VoIP product with a small number of employees, but our sales and marketing efforts have been limited. We plan to operate with a small number of employees until our revenues increase further or until we are able to attract additional financing that has money earmarked for sales and marketing expense.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and are not required to provide information under this item.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

There are no unresolved staff comments

Item 2. - Properties

The following table sets forth pertinent facts concerning our office leases at February 28, 2011.

Location	Use	Approximate Square Feet	Annual Rent
75 South Broadway White Plains, NY 10601	Office	200	$12,000

The lease for our office space in White Plains, New York is renewable every month. In addition to our private office space, we are provided with live telephone answering services and access to conference rooms. We maintain up to three employees at this location, and we plan to maintain this location in 2011. Most of our employees work from home offices. We are aware of vacant office space if the need arises to have employees working together in the same office.

Item 3. - Legal Proceedings

We are subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, is not likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, as the outcome of litigation or legal claims is difficult to predict, significant changes in exposures could occur.

Item 4. - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

During the fourth quarter, there were no matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders.

PART II

Item 5. -

Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market for Securities

Our common stock currently trades on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbol PVSP. The high and low closing price for each quarterly period of our last two fiscal years are listed below:

	High		Low
Fiscal 2010
1st Quarter	$	1.30	$	0.31
2nd Quarter		1.30		0.60
3rd Quarter		1.40		0.40
4th Quarter		0.74		0.05

Fiscal 2009
1st Quarter	$	2.50	$	0.70
2nd Quarter		3.70		0.90
3rd Quarter		4.00		1.50
4th Quarter		2.10		1.00

The quotations set forth in the table above reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The historical prices above have been adjusted to reflect a 1 for 10 reverse stock split on September 22, 2010. As of February 15, 2011 there were 186 holders of record of our common stock and approximately 2,000 beneficial holders.

We have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Our loan agreements with our lender does not allow us to directly or indirectly declare or pay any dividends so long as certain amounts of our secured term notes remain outstanding.

Recent Issuances of Unregistered Securities

The issuances described in this Item 5 were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act relating to sales by an issuer not involving any public offering. None of the foregoing transactions involved a distribution or public offering.

On September 1, 2010, we issued 40,000 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $14,400, in conjunction with a contractual obligation for investor relations services.

On September 27, 2010, we issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $55,000, to a company in conjunction with a contractual obligation for acquisition and marketing services.

On October 20, 2010, we issued 145,000 shares of restricted common stock and warrants to purchase 290,000 shares of common stock, for an aggregate price of $29,000, to our chief executive officer in conjunction with a private placement.

On November 30, 2010, we issued 800,000 shares of restricted common stock and warrants to purchase 1,600,000 shares of common stock, for an aggregate price of $80,000, to our chief executive officer in conjunction with a private placement. On November 30, 2010, we issued 500,000 shares of restricted common stock and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock to our chief information officer in lieu of cash payments of $50,000 for services rendered.

The following table provides information as of November 30, 2010 with respect to shares of our common stock that are issuable under equity compensation plans.

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of Securities remaining available to future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
1996 Restricted Stock Plan(1)						40,000
2007 Equity Incentive Plan(2)		85,500	$	2.30		-
Subtotal		85,500				40,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

Employee stock options		150,000		1.50		-
2004 Equity Incentive Plan (2)		19,000		2.42		-
2007 Contingent Option Plan (3)		650,694		2.70		-
2009 Equity Incentive Plan (2)		165,000		1.00		6,000
2010 Equity Incentive Plan (2)		150,000		.17		253
Institutional Marketing Services, Inc. (4)		10,000		6.30		-
Brian Holden (4)		50,000		1.00		-
Guilford Securities, Inc. (5)		10,000		4.00		-
Subtotal		1,204,694				6,253

Total		1,290,194				46,253

___________________________

(1)	Our Restricted Stock Plan provides for the issuance of restricted share grants to officers and non-officer employees.

(2)	Our 2004, 2007, 2009 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plans allow for the granting of share options to members of our board of directors, officers, non-officer employees and consultants.

(3)	The contingent options vest only if three consecutive months of positive cash flow from operations is achieved before their expiration in November 2012.

(4)	Warrants were issued for investor relations services.

(5)	Warrants were issued for consulting services.

Item 6. - Selected Financial Data

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide information under this item.

Item 7. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Please refer to page 1 of this Report for additional factors relating to such statements.

Overview

We deliver wholesale voice over IP (“VoIP”) telephone services for the residential and small business markets. Our wholesale customers generate most of our revenues, but we believe our growth will be in retail sales of our VoIP services to video phone users and mobile phone users. We were the first VoIP carrier to deploy an unlimited data and voice service plan on a smart phone that runs on a nationwide GSM network in the United States. Since then, we have developed our technology to allow us to sell our VoIP as an application that can be downloaded over the Internet to dozens of models of Nokia smart phones, to mobile phones that use the Android operating system or to the iPhone, so that a consumer can have a second phone line, phone number and related voice mail on his mobile phone. Our application runs over the data-side of the cell phone network or over WiFi, which means it does not use a person’s mobile phone voice minutes. We only use a small amount of data to complete the mobile phone call. Additionally, we are selling video phones that run over a fixed broadband connection, along with three different calling plans in the United States. The calling plans also come with very low international calling rates and free calling to other people who are members of our VoX network.

Cell phone networks provide both voice and data services. In a traditional cell phone service, we speak over the voice side of the network and we receive email messages and obtain Internet access over the data side of the network. With our service, the voice transmission runs over the data side of the cell phone networks, and the voice side is not used. The data side of the cell phone network is simply another avenue upon which we can run our IP telephony services. However, it is a cost-invasive method of delivering telephone service and it threatens to take away a significant number of subscribers from the large and more expensive cell phone carriers. We refer to our use of the data side of the cell phone networks as voice-over-IP enabled mobile phone service, or as Mobile VoIP.

We believe our Mobile VoIP product is a significant development in the mobile Internet industry and we plan to continue to use our existing resources to develop this business. Our access to capital has been limited, and we may abandon our existing wholesale VoIP business in order to further develop and sell our video and Mobile VoIP services. Industry projections indicate that Mobile VoIP calling will have worldwide significance in a relatively short period of time.

Revenues

Revenues consist of telephony services revenue and customer equipment revenue.

Telephony services revenue. The majority of our operating revenues are telephony services revenues. We offer several bundled plans, unlimited plans and basic plans for wholesale and retail customers. The wholesale plans do not change much from customer to customer as the plan we offer to a cable operator is typically the same plan we offer to a WiFi carrier, Internet service providers or satellite broadband carrier. Each of our unlimited plans offers unlimited domestic calling, subject to certain restrictions, and each of our basic plans offers a limited number of calling minutes per month. Under our basic plans, we charge on a per-minute basis when the number of calling minutes included in the plan is exceeded for a particular month. For all of our U.S. plans, we charge on a per-minute basis for international calls to destinations other than Canada. These per-minute fees are not included in our monthly subscription fees. Any plan we offer to our wholesale customers is also available to an individual end-user at a higher price that approximates the retail-selling price that most of our wholesale customers charge. We also have products that are on a per-minute usage basis, such as toll-free telephone numbers to businesses and international cell phone termination.

We derive most of our telephony services revenue from usage fees and monthly subscription fees we charge our customers under our service plans. We also offer a fax service over broadband, virtual phone numbers, toll free numbers and other services, for each of which we may charge an additional monthly fee. We automatically charge service fees monthly in advance to the credit cards of all of our retail customers. Our wholesale customers typically do not pay by credit card, but are required to give us a deposit. Depending on the volume of revenue generated by a wholesale customer, we bill them either weekly or monthly.

We charge retail customers a fee for activating service. Further, since we do not charge a retail customer for the cost of an analog telephone adapter (“ATA”), we generally charge a disconnect fee to customers who do not return their ATA to us upon termination of service, if the length of time between activation and termination is less than one year. Disconnect fees are recorded as revenue and are recognized at the time the customer terminates service. These revenues were nominal in fiscal 2010 and 2009.

Customer equipment revenue. Customer equipment revenue consists of revenue from sales of customer equipment to our wholesalers or directly to customers. In addition, customer equipment revenue includes the fees we charge our customers for shipping any equipment to them. In January 2011, we began selling video phones to retail customers, and these phones are considered customer equipment. Unlike the ATA, we charge the customer for the video phone.

Cost of Revenues

Direct cost of telephony services. Direct cost of telephony services primarily consists of fees we pay to third parties on an ongoing basis in order to provide our services. These fees include:

• Access charges we pay to other telephone companies to terminate digital voice calls on the public switched telephone network (“PSTN”). When a VoX subscriber calls another VoX subscriber, we do not pay an access charge, as the call routes through our network without touching the PSTN.

• The cost of leasing interconnections to route calls over the Internet and transfer calls between the Internet and the PSTN of various long distance carriers.

• The cost of leasing from other telephone companies the telephone numbers we provide to our customers. We lease these telephone numbers on a monthly basis.

• The cost of co-locating our connection point equipment in third-party facilities owned by other telephone companies.

• The cost of providing local number portability, which allows customers to move their existing telephone numbers from another provider to our service. Only regulated telecommunications providers have access to the centralized number databases that facilitate this process. Because VoX is not a regulated telecommunications provider, we must pay other telecommunications providers to process our local number portability requests.

• The cost of complying with the new FCC regulations regarding emergency services, which require us to provide enhanced emergency dialing capabilities to transmit 911 calls for all of our customers. This cost may increase in future periods.

• Taxes we pay on our purchases of telecommunications services from our suppliers.

Direct cost of customer equipment and shipping. Direct cost of equipment sold primarily consists of costs we incur when a customer first subscribes to our service. These costs include:

• The cost of the equipment we provide to customers who subscribe to our service through our direct sales channel, in each case in excess of activation fees.

• The cost of shipping and handling for customer equipment, together with the installation manual, we ship to customers.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009

Our revenues for fiscal 2010 decreased by approximately $796,000, or approximately 36%, to approximately $1,446,000 as compared to approximately $2,242,000 reported for fiscal 2009. The decrease in revenues was mainly due the loss of our largest customer in December 2009, which accounted for 34% of our revenues in fiscal 2009.

Our gross profit for fiscal 2010 decreased by approximately $11,000 to approximately $494,000 from a gross profit of approximately $505,000 reported in fiscal 2009, while our gross profit percentage of 34% in fiscal 2010, as compared to 23% in fiscal 2009, increased by 11 percentage points. Although we had a reduction of revenue due to the loss of our largest customer, we were able to reduce our cost of completing calls to phone numbers that are not on our network and to increase some of the fees we charge to our customers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased by approximately $476,000, or approximately 17%, to approximately $2,333,000 for fiscal 2010 from approximately $2,809,000 reported in the prior year fiscal period. The decrease is attributable to overhead cuts is salaries, rent and consulting fees that were implemented at the end of fiscal 2009.

Bad debt expense decreased by approximately $108,000 to approximately $38,000 for fiscal 2010 as compared to approximately $146,000 for the prior fiscal year. In fiscal 2009, several customers who had been paying their bills on time became delinquent. After unsuccessful attempts at collecting payments, we blocked these customers from using minutes on our switch, and our ability to collect payments from them were mostly unsuccessful. There were no large delinquencies in fiscal 2010.

A loss of approximately $785,000 due to the impairment of long-lived assets was recorded in fiscal 2009. No such loss was recorded in fiscal 2010. At November 30, 2009, we determined that our long-lived assets, consisting of capitalized software, equipment and deferred finance costs, no longer had a market value.

Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $555,000 for fiscal 2009. There was no depreciation and amortization expense recorded in fiscal 2010 due to the impairment loss that was recorded at November 30, 2009 and the expensing of all deferred financing cost at November 30, 2009.

Interest expense decreased by approximately $5,833,000 to approximately $1,424,000 for the year ended November 30, 2010 as compared to approximately $7,257,000 for the prior fiscal year. At November 30, 2009, long-term debt was carried at its face value plus accrued interest due to the fact that the debt is fully callable by the lender and as such the remaining unamortized debt discount was fully expensed as interest.

For the year ended November 30, 2009, we recorded other income of approximately $6,030,000, which resulted from the change in the market value of the warrants issued to our primary lender (see Note 5). Based on a number of factors, we determined that the warrants issued to our lender had no market value as of November 30, 2009. The warrants were canceled during the year ended November 30, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At November 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $32,000 and negative working capital of approximately $16,484,000 as compared to cash and cash equivalents of approximately $36,000 and negative working capital of approximately $14,380,000 at November 30, 2009.

Net cash used in operating activities aggregated approximately $488,000 and $1,277,000 in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The principal use of cash from operating activities in 2010 was the loss for the year of approximately $3,407,000. The use of cash was offset in part by an increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities of approximately $2,142,000, and common stock, options and warrants granted for services of approximately $359,000. The principal use of cash from operating activities in fiscal 2009 was the loss for the year of approximately $5,014,000, which included a non-cash gain for a mark-to-market adjustment of warrants of approximately $6,030,000. These uses of cash were offset in part by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $608,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately 555,000, and impairment loss of approximately $785,000 and amortization of debt discount of approximately $7,194,000.

Net cash used in investing activities aggregated approximately $181,000 in fiscal 2009. There was no investing activity in fiscal 2010.

Net cash provided by financing activities aggregated approximately $483,000 and $1,364,000 in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The principal sources of cash from financing activities were net proceeds from short-term borrowings of approximately $153,000 and proceeds from issuances of common stock of approximately $231,000. The principal source of cash from financing activities in fiscal 2009 was a drawdown of approximately $1,166,000 from a restricted cash account that was established from the sale of secured term notes.

In fiscal 2009, we spent approximately $181,000 on capital expenditures, primarily for software, servers and routers related to our IP network. In fiscal 2010 there were no expenditures for capital assets. While we believe we also will make capital expenditures for our IP platform in fiscal 2011, primarily for programmers who are creating VoIP applications to download to mobile phones, we are not able to quantify our projected expenditures because the amount we spend will be dependent upon our cash resources during fiscal 2011, which cannot be estimated at this time and will be dependent on our ability to raise additional equity capital in the capital markets.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of our company as a going concern. However, we have sustained net losses from operations during the last several years, and we have very limited liquidity. Management anticipates that we will be dependent, for the near future, on additional capital to fund our operating expenses and anticipated growth and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm expresses doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our operating losses have been funded through the issuance of equity securities and borrowings, including borrowings from our primarily lender on eight separate occasions over the past six years and funding from our chief executive officer. Although we are not yet profitable and we are not generating cash from operations, our lender has indicated verbally that it plans to continue to be cooperative with us, although it cannot provide us with any additional funding, and did not lend us any additional money in fiscal 2010. Our lender, up to this point in time, has not been requiring any payments of interest and principal on a monthly basis and has not demanded repayment. We need immediate funding in order to continue our business operations. Our lender has been speaking with potential investors since October 2010 in an effort to sell them, at a discounted price, the debt that we owe to our lender. We anticipate that any investor that purchases the debt that we owe to our lender will also want to fund our company’s operations going forward so that the investment it made in purchasing the debt from our lender would not become worthless. While we continually look for other financing sources, in the current economic environment, the procurement of outside funding is extremely difficult and there can be no assurance that such financing will be available, or, if available, that such financing will be at a price that will be acceptable to us. Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital, or renegotiate payment terms of our debt will have an adverse impact on our ability to achieve our longer-term business objectives, and will adversely affect our ability to continue operating as a going concern.

New Accounting Standards

The new accounting pronouncements in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in this Report, are incorporated herein by reference thereto.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates include:

revenue recognition and estimating allowance for doubtful accounts;

valuation of long-lived assets; and

income tax valuation allowance.

We continually evaluate our accounting policies and the estimates we use to prepare our consolidated financial statements. In general, the estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals and on various other sources and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances at the time such estimates are made. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:

it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and

changes in the estimate, or the use of different estimating methods, could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in this Report. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP. There are also areas in which management's judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

Certain of our accounting policies are deemed “critical”, as they require management's highest degree of judgment, estimates and assumptions. The following critical accounting policies are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies or estimates:

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from telecommunication services in the period that the service is provided. We estimate amounts earned for carrier interconnection and access fees based on usage.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that result from the inability or unwillingness of our customers to make required payments. We base our allowances on our determination of the likelihood of recoverability of trade accounts receivable based on past experience and current collection trends that are expected to continue. In addition, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our significant customers and we require most of our wholesale customers to post a deposit, typically an amount between $2,500 and $5,000, which may be refunded after several months of prompt payments.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance requires that certain assets be reviewed for impairment and, if impaired, remeasured at fair value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Impairment loss estimates are primarily based upon management's analysis and review of the carrying value of long-lived assets at each balance sheet date, utilizing an undiscounted future cash flow calculation. During fiscal 2009 we recognized an impairment loss as we concluded the carrying amount of internally developed capitalized software was not be recoverable. No impairment losses were recognized in fiscal 2010, as we no longer have any long-lived assets.

Income Taxes

We estimate the degree to which tax assets and loss carryforwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance for such tax assets and loss carryforwards is provided when it is determined that such assets will more likely than not go unused. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset or loss carryforward will be used, the related valuation allowance on such assets is reversed. If actual future taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Share-Based Payment

We account for our stock-based compensation under the FASB authoritative guidance. Equity classified stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Liability classified stock-based compensation cost is re-measured at each reporting date and is recognized over the requisite service period. We calculate the fair value of our employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of non-employee options and warrants are calculated based upon the cost of the services provided to us. Compensation expense for awards with graded vesting provisions is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of each separately vesting portion of the award. Compensation expense for contingent stock option awards is recognized when it is probable that the contingent event will occur.

Item 7A. – Quanitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide information under this item.

Item 8. – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our Consolidated Financial Statements required by this Item are included herein, commencing on page F-1.

Item 9. - Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer/chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer/chief financial officer has concluded that, as of the end of such period, for the reasons set forth below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer/chief financial officer, management has evaluated internal control over financial reporting using the framework for effective internal control established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2010. During the course of this assessment, management identified material weaknesses relating primarily to:

recording complex financial transactions, primarily in the analysis and calculation of debt financings, transaction involving taxes and the issuance of warrants and options.

We have a lack of staffing within our accounting department, both in terms of the small number of employees performing our financial and accounting functions and their lack of experience to account for complex financial and taxation transactions. This lack of staffing continued throughout fiscal 2010 and as of the date of this report. Management believes the lack of qualified accounting and financial personnel amounts to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and, as a result, at November 30, 2010 and on the date of this Report, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. We will continue to evaluate the employees involved, the need to engage outside consultants with accounting and tax expertise to assist us in accounting for complex transactions and the hiring of additional accounting staff. However, we will be unable to remedy this material weakness in our internal controls until we have the financial resources that allow us to hire additional qualified employees.

Our management, including our chief executive officer/chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

This report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Report.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. – Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that a director shall hold office until the annual meeting for the year in which his or her term expires except in the case of elections to fill vacancies or newly created directorships. While each director is typically elected for a one-year term, we did not have an annual stockholders meeting for the election of directors in 2010. Set forth below are the name, age and the positions and offices held by each of our current directors, his principal occupation and business experience during at least the past five years and the names of other publicly-held companies of which he serves as a director.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our directors as of February 28, 2011. All of the following individuals currently serve as directors of our company.

Name	Age	Principal Occupation for Past Five Years and Current Public Directorships or Trusteeships
Paul H. Riss	55	Director since 1995; Chairman of our board of directors since March 2005; our Chief Executive Officer since August 1999 and our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since November 1996.
Greg M Cooper	51	Director since April 2004; partner for more than five years of Cooper, Niemann & Co., CPAs, LLP, certified public accountants; member of the board of directors of Mid Hudson Cooperative Insurance Company in Montgomery, New York, a privately-held insurance company.
Mark Richards	51	Director since January 2008; Chief Information Officer of VoX Communications Corp., our wholly owned subsidiary, since October 2004.
Cherian Mathai	54	Director since March 2008; President of Sophia Associates Inc., a management consulting and advisory firm since 2007; Co-founded and served as Chief Operating Officer of Tralliance Corporation, the registry for .travel Internet Top Level Domain from January 2002 to June 2007.
Scott Widham	53	Director since March 2008; Principal in CAS, LLC, a technology and telecom consulting company since 2007; President – Sales and Marketing, President – Corporate Development and Co-CEO of Broadwing Corporation, a voice, data and video service provider from 2001 to 2007; Serves on the board of directors of Priva Technologies, Stages and Game Rail.

Mr. Riss and Mr. Richards serve as our named executive officers or key employees.

Board Meetings and Committees; Management Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the number of members of our Board of Directors shall be not less than three and not more than five. There are currently five directors on the Board. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors are elected to hold office for a term of one year and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.

Our board of directors held 11 meetings during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010. During fiscal 2010, each director attended at least 75% of the board of directors and committee meetings of which he was a member during such time as he served as a director, except for Mr. Mathai who attended six meetings and Mr. Widham who attended seven meetings. From time to time, the members of our board of directors act by unanimous written consent pursuant to the laws of the State of New York. No fees are paid to directors for attendance at meetings of the board of directors.

Compensation Committee

We have a compensation committee currently composed of Greg M Cooper and Scott Widham. Mr. Widham is the Chairman of the committee. The compensation committee establishes remuneration levels for our executive officers. The compensation committee did not meet during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010.

Nominating Committee

Our board of directors does not have a nominating committee. Our entire board of directors is responsible for this function. Due to the relatively small size of our company and the resulting efficiency of a board of directors that is also limited in size, our board of directors has determined that it is not necessary or appropriate at this time to establish a separate nominating committee. Our board of directors intends to review periodically whether such a nominating committee should be established.

Our board of directors uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. It regularly assesses the appropriate size of the board of directors, and whether any vacancies exist or are expected due to retirement or otherwise. If vacancies exist, are anticipated or otherwise arise, our board of directors considers various potential candidates for director. Candidates may come to their attention through current members of our board of directors, shareholders or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of our board of directors, and may be considered at any point during the year.

Qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise that may be desired in order to complement the qualifications that already exist among our board of directors. Among the factors that our directors consider when evaluating proposed nominees are their independence, financial literacy, business experience, character, judgment and strategic vision. Other considerations would be their knowledge of issues affecting our business, their leadership experience and their time available for meetings and consultation on company matters. Our directors seek a diverse group of candidates who possess the background skills and expertise to make a significant contribution to our board of directors, our company and our shareholders.

Audit Committee

We have an audit committee that, during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, was composed of Greg M Cooper, Cherian Mathai and Scott Widham. Each audit committee member is an independent director as defined by the rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers. A written charter approved by our board of directors and attached as Annex A to our 2007 proxy statement, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Commission”) on May 15, 2007, governs the audit committee.

Our board of directors has determined that Greg M Cooper qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the rules of the Commission adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Mathai and Mr. Widham are financially literate and experienced in business matters and fully qualified to monitor the performance of management, the public disclosures by our company of our financial condition and performance, our internal accounting operations, and our independent auditors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities (“10% Shareholders”), to file with the Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Officers, directors and 10% Shareholders are required by Commission regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports received by us, we believe that for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2010, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% shareholders were complied with.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. In addition, we have adopted a supplemental code of ethics for our financial executives and all employees in our accounting department. The text of our codes are posted on our Internet website at www.pervasip.com.

Item 11. - Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years indicated, all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to Mr. Paul H. Riss, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Mark Richards, our Chief Information Officer (collectively, the “Named Executives”). We have no other executive officers.

Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($) (1)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)(2)	Option Awards ($)(3)	Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Comp Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)(4)	Total ($)
Paul H. Riss Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer	2010 2009 2008	$175,000 165,000 175,000	$0 0 0	$0 10,000 0	$0 0 0	$0 0 0	$0 0 0	$0 0 0	$175,000 175,000 175,000
Mark Richards Chief Information Officer	2010 2009 2008	5,000 105,000 125,000	0 0 0	120,000 20,000 0	71,520 10,190 5,782	0 0 0	0 0 0	55,000 60,000 60,000	251,520 195,190 190,782

(1)

The salary for Mr. Riss has been accrued since February 6, 2009 and is payable to him. Mr. Richards received $120,000 of compensation in common stock in fiscal 2010 and $20,000 in fiscal 2009. Mr. Richards received a $5,000 cash payment for salary in November 2009 and is owed $10,000 in unpaid salary at November 30, 2010.

(2)

Amounts in this column reflect the expense recognized for financial reporting purposes for the indicated fiscal year, in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, with respect to awards of restricted shares of common stock, which may include awards made during earlier years as well as the indicated year.

(3)

Amounts in this column reflect the expense recognized for financial reporting purposes for the indicated fiscal year, in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance, with respect to awards of options to purchase common stock, which may include awards made during earlier years as well as the indicated year.

(4)

Mr. Richards received consulting fees from one of our vendors amounting to $55,000 in fiscal 2010 and $60,000 in each of fiscal 2009 and 2008.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to stock options outstanding as of November 30, 2010 for each of the named executive officers. No stock awards have been made to the named executive officers. The Named Executives did not exercise any options in Fiscal 2010.

			Option Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1): Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price		Option Expiration Date

Paul H. Riss		-		-		189,444	$	3.00	11/17/2012
Mark Richards		-		-		236,805	$	3.00	11/17/2012
Mark Richards		50,000		100,000		-	$	1.50	10/09/2014

(1) The options granted to Mr. Riss and Mr. Richards are contingent stock options, which vest only if we achieve positive cash flow from operations for three consecutive months before the options expire in November 2012.

Stock Option Grants

No individual grants of stock options and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) were made during fiscal 2010 to the Named Executives.

Board of Directors Compensation

We do not currently compensate directors in cash for service on our board of directors. We maintain a Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Option Plan”). Under the Director Option Plan, each non-employee director is granted a non-statutory option to purchase 1,000 shares of our common stock on the date on which he or she is elected, re-elected or appointed to our board of directors. Our existing directors were last re-elected on May 13, 2009. Options granted pursuant to the Director Option Plan will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, provided the non-employee director is still our director at that time. The exercise price granted under the Director Option Plan is 100% of the fair market value per share of the common stock on the date of the grant as reported on The OTC Bulletin Board.

Item 12. - Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

As of February 15, 2011, there were 12,064,95 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote with respect to each item to be voted on by holders of the shares of common stock. We have no other securities, voting or nonvoting, outstanding.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of February 15, 2011 by:

Each person whom we know beneficially owns more than 5% of the common stock;

each of our directors individually;

each of our named executive officers individually; and

all of our current directors and executive officers as a group

Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock. Each person listed below disclaims beneficial ownership of their shares, except to the extent of their pecuniary interests therein. Shares of common stock that an individual or group has the right to acquire within 60 days of February 28, 2011 pursuant to the exercise of options or restricted stock are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person or group, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by any other person listed.

Name and Address	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned	Percent of Shares Beneficially Owned
Paul H. Riss Pervasip Corp. 75 South Broadway, Suite 400 White Plains, New York 10601	3,738,533(1)	26.38%
Mark Richards 75 South Broadway, Suite 400 White Plains, New York 10601	1,751,000(2)	12.59%
Greg M. Cooper Cooper, Niemann & Co., CPAs, LLP PO Box 190 Mongaup Valley, New York 12762	16,000(3)	*
Scott Widham 9865 Litzsinger Road St Louis, Missouri 63124	21,000(4)	*
Cherian Mathai 75 South Broadway, Suite 400 White Plains, New York 10601	11,000(5)	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (five individuals)	5,437,533	35.62%

__________________

* Less than 1%.

(1)	Includes 2,106,000 shares of common stock subject to warrants that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2011.

(2)	Includes 1,050,000 shares of common stock subject to options that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2011.

(3)	Includes 12,000 shares of common stock subject to options that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2011.

(4)	Includes 21,000 shares of common stock subject to options that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2011.

(5)	Includes 11,000 shares of common stock subject to options that are presently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2011.

Item 13. - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

We paid fees to an intellectual property development firm (“Consultant”) of $252,000 and $253,000 in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectfully. All such work performed by the Consultant is the property of our company. We hired individuals who were performing work for us on behalf of the Consultant, and during fiscal 2007, we hired the owner of the Consultant. An officer of our company has performed work for the Consultant, including disbursement services, in which funds that were remitted by us to the Consultant were subsequently transferred to a company controlled by the officer to distribute such funds to appropriate vendors. Our officer received fees from the Consultant of $55,000 in fiscal 2010 and $60,000 in fiscal 2009. Total funds paid to the Consultant in fiscal 2010 were expensed as operating costs. In fiscal 2009, $90,000 in fees paid to the Consultant were capitalized as internal use software and computer equipment, which were subsequently written off as an impairment loss at November 30, 2009. The remaining fees of $162,000 in fiscal 2009 were deemed to be operating costs.

At November 30, 2010 total amount due to our chief executive officer, including unpaid salary and expenses amounted to $142,000. Additionally, from December 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011, we owe our chief executive officer short-term loans totaling $512,000.

At November 30, 2010, unpaid salary that was owed to our chief information officer amounted to $10,000. In fiscal 2011 we have been accruing $5,000 a month in salary payable to our chief information officer and $14,583 a month payable to our chief executive officer.

Director Independence

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB marketplace and is not listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or any other national securities exchange. Accordingly, we are not currently subject to the Nasdaq continued listing requirements or the requirements of any other national securities exchange. Nevertheless, in determining whether a director or nominee for director should be considered “independent” the board utilizes the definition of independence set forth in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Greg M Cooper, Cherian Mathai and Scott Widham qualify as “independent” under this rule.

Item 14. - Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, and fees billed for other services rendered by Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow LLP during those periods.

	2010		2009
Audit fees	$	97,500	$	97,500
Audit related fees		−		−
Tax fees		−		15,000
All other fees		1,420		1,420
Total	$	98,920	$	113,920

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees we paid Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow LLP for professional services for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our quarterly reports filed with the SEC, as well as for work generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, such as statutory audits and consultation regarding financial accounting and/or reporting standards; “audit-related fees” are fees billed by Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow LLP for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements; “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning; and “all other fees” are fees billed by Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow LLP for any services not included in the first three categories.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditor. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor.

Prior to engagement of the independent auditor for the next year's audit, management will submit an aggregate of services expected to be rendered during that year for each of four categories of services to the Audit Committee for approval.

1. Audit services include audit work performed in the preparation of financial statements, as well as work that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably be expected to provide, including comfort letters and reviews of our financials statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

2. Audit-Related services are for assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent auditor, including due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plan audits, and special procedures required to meet certain regulatory requirements.

3. Tax services include all services performed by the independent auditor's tax personnel except those services specifically related to the audit of the financial statements, and includes fees in the areas of tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

4. Other services are those associated with services not captured in the other categories. We generally do not request such services from the independent auditor.

Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category of service. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Item 15. - Exhibits financial statement schedules

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

	(1)	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
		Financial Statements covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
		Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2010 and 2009
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009
		Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Deficiency for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009
		Consolidated statements of Cash Flows for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009

(b) Exhibits

(3)

Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

		(a)	Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 1969 under Registration Number 2-34436.
		(b)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in May 1984.
		(c)	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1988.
		(d)	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1994, as amended.
		(e)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 30, 1995.
		(f)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(f) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1998.
		(g)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 1998.
		(h)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(1) to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 16, 1999.
		(i)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(1) to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 28, 2007.
		(j)	By-laws, amended and restated as of December 1996, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1996

(10)

Material Contracts

		(a)	1996 Restricted Stock Award Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to our Proxy Statement dated October 24, 1996.
		(b)	Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, dated March 30, 2001, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2003.
		(c)	2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A to our Proxy Statement dated April 12, 2005.
		(d)	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, between our Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005.
		(e)	Master Security Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, among us, New Rochelle Telephone Corp., Telecarrier Services, Inc., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp. in favor of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005.
		(f)	Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, executed by our Company in favor of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005.
		(g)	Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of February 8, 2005, executed by New Rochelle Telephone Corp., Telecarrier Services, Inc., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005.
		(h)	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2005, our Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2005.
		(i)	Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2005, executed by our Company, New Rochelle Telephone Corp., Telecarrier Services, Inc., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2005.
		(j)	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2006, between our Company and Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May31, 2006.
		(k)	Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2006, executed by our Company, New Rochelle Telephone Corp., Telecarrier Services, Inc., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2006.
		(l)	Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 14, 2006 by and among our Company, CYBD Acquisition, Inc. and Cyber Digital, Inc., with respect to the capital stock of New Rochelle Telephone Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2006.
		(m)	Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 14, 2006 by and among our Company, CYBD Acquisition II, Inc. and Cyber Digital, Inc., with respect to the capital stock of Telecarrier Services, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2006.
		(n)	2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex B to our Proxy Statement dated May 15, 2007.
		(o)	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of September 28, 2007, among our Company, LV Administrative Services, Inc., Calliope Capital Corporation and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.

		(p)	Secured Term Note, dated as of September 28, 2007, of our Company to Calliope Capital Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(q)	Secured Term Note, dated as of September 28, 2007, of our Company to Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(r)	Third Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of September 28, 2007 of our Company to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(s)	Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of September 28, 2007 of our Company to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(t)	Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007, executed among our Company, Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc. AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(u)	Subsidiary Guarantee dated as of September 28, 2007 by Vox Communications Corp., AVI Holding Corp., Telcosoftware.com Corp. and Line One, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(v)	Master Security Agreement dated as of September 28, 2007 among our Company, Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp., TelcoSoftware.com Corp. and LV Administrative Services Inc., as agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(w)	Stock Pledge Agreement dated as of September 28, 2007 among LV Administrative Services Inc., as agent, our Company., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 4, 2007.
		(x)	2007 Contingent Option Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (ll) to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2007.
		(y)	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of May 28, 2008, among Pervasip Corp., LV Administrative Services, Inc. and the Purchasers listed therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(z)	Secured Term Note, dated as of May 28, 2008, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(aa)	Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of May 28, 2008, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(bb)	Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of May 28, 2008, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(cc)	Fourth Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of May 28, 2008 of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(dd)	Second Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of May 28, 2008 of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(ee)	Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2008, executed among Pervasip Corp., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp., TelcoSoftware.com Corp. and Valens Offshore SPVI, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.

		(ff)	Reaffirmation and Ratification Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2008, executed among Pervasip Corp., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp., TelcoSoftware.com Corp. and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(gg)	Subsidiary Guarantee dated as of May 28, 2008 by Vox Communications Corp., AVI Holding Corp., Telcosoftware.com Corp. and Line One, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(hh)	Master Security Agreement dated as of May 28, 2008 among Pervasip Corp., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp., TelcoSoftware.com Corp. and LV Administrative Services Inc., as agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(ii)	Stock Pledge Agreement dated as of May 28, 2008 among LV Administrative Services Inc., as agent, Pervasip Corp., Vox Communications Corp., Line One, Inc., AVI Holding Corp. and TelcoSoftware.com Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(jj)	Amendment to September 28, 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 28, 2008, executed among Pervasip Corp., LV Administrative Services, Inc., as agent, Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd. and Valens Offshore SPV II, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2008.
		(kk)	Letter Agreement dated as of October 15, 2008, among Pervasip Corp., LV Administrative Services, Inc. and Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15, 2008.
		(ll)	Secured Term Note, dated as of October 15, 2008, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15, 2008.
		(mm)	Letter Agreement dated as of December 12, 2008, among Pervasip Corp., LV Administrative Services, Inc. and Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 12, 2008.
		(nn)	Second Amended and Restated Secured Term Note, dated as of December 12, 2008, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 12, 2008.
		(oo)	Letter Agreement dated as of February 18, 2009 among Pervasip Corp., LV Administrative Services, Inc. and Valens Offshore SPV I, Ltd., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 18, 2009.
		(pp)	Secured Term Note, dated as of February 18, 2009, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 18, 2009.
		(qq)	Secured Term Note, dated as of February 18, 2009, of Pervasip Corp. to Valens Offshore SPV I, Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 18, 2009.
		(rr)	2009 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Annex A to our Proxy Statement dated April 9, 2009.
		(ss)	Demand note dated November 5, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2009.
		(tt)	2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
		(uu)	12% Convertible Debenture dated December 24, 2011 of Pervasip Corp. to Redwood Management LLC.

(22)	Subsidiaries - The significant wholly-owned subsidiary is as follows:

Name	Jurisdiction of Organization
VoX Communications Corp.	Delaware

(23)	Consent of Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow, LLP

(31.1)

Certification of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Paul H. Riss, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32.1)

Certification of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Paul H. Riss, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this Report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 16th day of March 2011.

	PERVASIP CORP. (Company)



	By:	/s/ Paul H. Riss
		Paul H. Riss Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date


/s/ Paul H. Riss	Chairman of the Board of Directors	March 16, 2011
Paul H. Riss	Chief Executive Officer
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Accounting Officer)


/s/ Greg M. Cooper	Director	March 16, 2011
Greg M Cooper


/s/ Cherian Mathai	Director	March 16, 2011
Cherian Mathai


/s/ Mark Richards	Director	March 16, 2011
Mark Richards


/s/ Scott Widham	Director	March 16, 2011
Scott Widham

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AS OF AND FOR THE

YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONTENTS

		Page Number


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-1

Consolidated Financial Statements

Balance Sheets		F-2

Statements of Loss		F-3

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Deficiency and Comprehensive Loss		F-4

Statements of Cash Flows		F-5

Notes to Financial Statements		F-6 – F-31

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Pervasip Corp.

White Plains, New York

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pervasip Corp. and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of loss, stockholders’ equity deficiency and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. Pervasip Corp.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pervasip Corp. and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As further discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company, among other matters, has negative working capital, a stockholders’ equity deficiency, has suffered recurring losses from operations and is unable to meet its obligations as they become due which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

NUSSBAUM YATES BERG KLEIN & WOLPOW, LLP

Melville, New York

March 16, 2011

F-1

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

ASSETS

	2010		2009

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31,653	$	35,993
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $141,585 in 2010 and $214,413 in 2009		90,038		184,840
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		40,961		50,393

Total current assets		162,652		271,226

Other assets		43,819		116,143

Total assets	$	206,471	$	387,369

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY DEFICIENCY


Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	14,130,578		$	12,377,252
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		2,515,769			2,273,681

Total current liabilities		16,646,347			14,650,933

Accrued pension obligation		1,369,395			1,266,885

Total liabilities		18,015,742			15,917,818

Stockholders’ equity deficiency:
Preferred stock, $.10 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.10 par value; 250,000,000 shares
authorized; 6,871,606 and 2,848,837 shares issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009		687,161			284,883
Capital in excess of par value		31,852,584			31,126,681
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,789			1,578
Deficit		(50,350,805	)		(46,943,591	)

Total stockholders’ equity deficiency		(17,809,271	)		(15,530,449	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity deficiency	$	206,471		$	387,369

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009

Revenues	$	1,446,086		$	2,242,330

Cost and expenses:
Costs of services		951,681			1,737,468
Selling, general and administrative		2,333,401			2,808,502
Provision for bad debts		37,515			145,611
Impairment loss		-			784,913
Depreciation and amortization		-			555,020

Total costs and expenses		3,322,597			6,031,514

Loss from operations		(1,876,511	)		(3,789,184	)

Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(1,424,356	)		(7,257,194	)
Other, net		(77,928	)		2,374
Mark to market adjustment of derivative liabilities		(28,419	)		6,030,021

Total other expense		(1,530,703	)		(1,224,799	)

Net loss	$	(3,407,214	)	$	(5,013,983	)

Loss per share	$	(1.00	)	$	(1.86	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:		3,410,748			2,692,186

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY DEFICIENCY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009


											Accumulated			Total
					Capital						Other			Stockholders'
	Common Stock				in Excess of						Comprehensive			Equity
	Shares		Amount		Par Value			Deficit			Income (Loss)			Deficiency
Balance, December 1, 2008		2,602,617	$	260,261	$	30,803,894		$	(41,929,608	)	$	(2,616	)	$	(10,868,069	)

Net loss									(5,013,983	)					(5,013,983	)

Foreign currency translation adjustment												4,194			4,194

Comprehensive loss															(5,009,789	)

Employee stock based compensation		30,000		3,000		129,752									132,752

Options granted for services						57,259									57,259

Common stock issued for services		69,000		6,900		171,500									178,400

Cancelled warrants						(201,412	)								(201,412	)

Stock subscription receivable						(34,500	)								(34,500	)

Exercise of stock options		147,220		14,722		200,188									214,910

Balance, November 30, 2009		2,848,837		284,883		31,126,681			(46,943,591	)		1,578			(15,530,449	)

Net loss									(3,407,214	)					(3,407,214	)

Foreign currency translation adjustment												211			211

Comprehensive loss															(3,407,003	)

Employee stock based compensation and conversions		582,014		58,202		193,869									252,071

Options granted for services						14,000									14,000

Common stock issued for services		553,000		55,300		289,800									345,100

Issuance of common stock for satisfaction of liabilities		1,588,555		158,856		30,624									189,480

Issuance of common stock		1,071,700		107,170		123,860									231,030

Stock subscription receivable						4,000									4,000

Exercise of stock options		227,500		22,750		69,750									92,500

Balance, November 30, 2010		6,871,606	$	687,161	$	31,852,584		$	(50,350,805	)	$	1,789		$	(17,809,271	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(3,407,214	)	$	(5,013,983	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		-			555,020
Non-cash stock based compensation		120,056			132,752
Common stock, options and warrants granted for services		359,100			368,826
Provision for bad debts		37,515			145,611
Impairment loss		-			784,913
Loss on settlement of liabilities		88,652			-
Amortization of debt discount		17,775			7,194,151
Mark to market adjustment of derivative liabilities		28,419			(6,030,021	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		57,287			(125,157	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(3,568	)		26,539
Other assets		72,324			76,516
Accounts payable, other current liabilities and accrued pension obligation		2,142,064			607,545

Net cash used in operating activities		(487,590	)		(1,277,288	)

Investing activities,
purchase of property and equipment		-			(181,247	)

Financing activities:
Net proceeds from short-term borrowing		153,000			60,000
Inflow from restricted cash account		-			1,165,528
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		109,500			147,410
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		231,030			-
Payments of long-term debt		(10,280	)		(8,748	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		483,250			1,364,190

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(4,340	)		(94,345	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		35,993			130,338

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	31,653		$	35,993


Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	-		$	92,573
Taxes	$	-		$	-

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

See Notes 5, 10 and 14 for non-cash investing and financing activities.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1. Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles

Description of Business and Concentrations

Pervasip Corp. (“Pervasip” or the “Company”) is a provider of voice and video telephone services, products and hosted solutions. The Company offers its customers high-quality Internet telephone products and services that are a cost-effective alternative to traditional wireline telephone services. Most of the Company’s revenues are derived from customers that are broadband service providers or other telephone service providers. The Company provides them with a customized private label Internet protocol (“IP”) telephony service, as well as a back-office and web suite of services. The Company uses Session Initiation Protocol technology to provide all the components needed to support its IP telephony service.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of significant intercompany balances and transactions.

Property and Equipment and Depreciation

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed primarily by use of accelerated and straight-line methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are three to five years for computer equipment and software, and five years for furniture and fixtures. At November 30, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment loss on its property and equipment and wrote off all previously recorded property and equipment.

Computer Software Development Costs

Direct development costs associated with internal-use computer software are accounted for in accordance with authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and are capitalized. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as for maintenance and training, are expensed as incurred. Amortization is provided on a straight-line basis over the shorter of five years or the estimated useful life of the software. At November 30, 2009 the Company recognized an impairment loss on its capitalized software and wrote off all previously recorded software development costs. In the year ended November 30, 2010, no internal-use computer software costs met the criteria to be capitalized and no depreciation expense was recorded. Depreciation expense was $175,765 for the year ended November 30, 2009.

F-6

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1. Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities during the period in which related temporary differences become deductible. A valuation allowances has been established to eliminate the Company’s deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that none of the deferred tax assets will be realized.

The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the tax authorities. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company records interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in income tax expense. The Company has determined that it had no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition or disclosure.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from voice, data and other telecommunications-related services are recognized in the period in which subscribers use the related services. Revenues for carrier interconnection and access are recognized in the period in which the service is provided.

Collectibility of Accounts Receivable

Trade receivables potentially subject the Company to credit risk. The Company extends credit to its customers and generally requires a deposit to minimize its credit risk. Once a customer is billed for services, the Company actively manages the accounts receivable and may return the deposit if the customer has a track record of making timely payments of invoices for six consecutive months.

F-7

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1.	Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Collectibility of Accounts Receivable (Continued)

In order to record the Company’s accounts receivable at their net realizable value, the Company must assess their collectibility. A considerable amount of judgment is required in order to make this assessment, including an analysis of historical bad debts and other adjustments, a review of the aging of the Company’s receivables, and the current creditworthiness of the Company’s customers. Generally, when a customer account reaches a certain level of delinquency, the Company disconnects the customer’s service and provides an allowance for the related amount receivable from the customer. The Company has recorded allowances for receivables that it considered uncollectible, including amounts for the resolution of potential credit and other collection issues, such as disputed invoices and pricing discrepancies. However, depending on how such potential issues are resolved, or if the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers was to deteriorate and its ability to make required payments became impaired, increases in these allowances may be required. The Company writes off the accounts receivable balance from a customer and the related allowance established when it believes it has exhausted all reasonable collection efforts.

Deferred Finance Costs

Deferred finance costs represented costs incurred in connection with securing financing and are amortized over the loan term. Such costs were fully written off during the year ended November 30, 2009.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. To the extent that stock options and warrants are anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants. For 2010 and 2009, the Company excluded from its loss per share calculations potentially dilutive securities of 4,707,094 and 17,678,505, respectively, because their effect on loss per share was anti-dilutive.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company did not have any cash equivalents during 2010 and 2009.

F-8

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1. Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Concentrations

As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had one customer and two customers that constituted 15% and 32%, respectively, of its accounts receivable. For the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, one customer accounted for 23% and one customer 34% of the Company’s revenues.

The Company is dependent on the availability and functionality of the networks of its three primary suppliers and is vulnerable to a cessation or disruption of service if the Company is not able to pay these vendors timely.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated at year-end exchange rates, and income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year with the resulting adjustments accumulated in stockholders’ equity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future forecasted net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair values. For the year ended November 30, 2009, the Company incurred significant operating and cash flow losses. Combined with a previous history of such losses, as of November 30, 2009, the Company evaluated whether the carrying amount of the long-lived assets of this business was recoverable. At November 30, 2009, based upon the inability to further utilize the assets as collateral for additional borrowings and the long-term debt being callable by its lender, among other factors, the Company determined its long-lived assets were impaired and recorded an impairment loss of $784,913.

Use of Estimates

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, income tax valuation allowance, the warrant liability and conclusions regarding the impairment of long-lived assets. On a continual basis, management reviews its estimates, utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, and if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-9

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1. Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

The Company accounts for derivative instruments under the FASB authoritative guidance, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other financial instruments or contracts and requires recognition of all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value, regardless of the hedging relationship designation. Accounting for the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives qualify as hedge relationships and the types of the relationships designated are based on the exposures hedged. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings along with fair value changes of the hedged item. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and are recognized in earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments which are not designated as hedges are recognized in earnings as other income (loss). At November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not have any derivative instruments that were designated as hedges.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company issues stock and stock options to its employees, outside directors and consultants pursuant to stockholder approved and non-approved stock option programs.

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded approximately $120,000 and $133,000 in employee stock-based compensation expense and approximately $359,000 and $369,000 in consultant compensation expense, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, there was approximately $150,000 and $302,000, respectively, of unrecognized stock-compensation expense for previously granted unvested options that will be recognized over a period of up to three years.

The Company’s 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”) provides for the grant of up to 340,000 incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, tandem stock appreciation rights, and stock appreciation rights of shares of common stock. Under the 1995 Plan, incentive stock options could be granted at no less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and in the case of an optionee who owns directly or indirectly more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock (“an Affilitate”), 110% of the market price on the date of grant. As of November 30, 2009, 16,500 grants for option shares were issued and unexercised. The plan has terminated and no option grants exist under the 1995 Plan at November 30, 2010.

F-10

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1.	Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Stock Based Compensation (Continued)

The Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) provides for the grant of up to 100,000 incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, tandem stock appreciation rights, and stock appreciation rights of shares of common stock. Under the 2004 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted at no less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and in the case of an optionee who owns directly or indirectly more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock (“an Affiliate”), 110% of the market price on the date of grant. As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 0 and 17,200 option shares remain unissued.

The Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) provides for the grant of up to 200,000 incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, tandem stock appreciation rights, and stock appreciation rights of shares of common stock. Under the 2007 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted at no less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and in the case of an optionee who owns directly or indirectly more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock (“an Affiliate”), 110% of the market price on the date of grant. As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 0 and 114,500 option shares remain unissued.

The Company’s 2007 Contingent Stock Option Plan (the “Contingent Plan”) provides for the grant of up to 789,351 contingent stock options. Under the Contingent Plan, contingent stock options may be granted at no less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and in the case of an optionee who owns directly or indirectly more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock (“an Affiliate”), 110% of the market price on the date of grant. As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, all options have been granted under this plan. The options expire on November 19, 2012. These options vest when the Company has generated, for three consecutive months, positive cash flow from operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expense. The Company has determined that the performance condition is not probable of achievement, and accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized during the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009. The Company will reassess at each reporting date whether achievement of the performance condition is probable and would begin recognizing compensation cost if and when achievement of the performance condition becomes probable.

The Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”) provides for the grant of up to 500,000 incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, tandem stock appreciation rights, and stock appreciation rights of shares of common stock. Under the 2009 Plan, incentive stock options may be granted at no less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, and in the case of an optionee who owns directly or indirectly more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock (“an Affiliate”), 110% of the market price on the date of grant. As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 6,000 and 138,900 option shares remain unissued and are available for future issuance under the 2009 Plan through February 27, 2019.

F-11

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1.	Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Stock Based Compensation (Continued)

The Company’s Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of options to purchase 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to each non-employee director on the first business day following each annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company. Under this Plan, options may be granted at no less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

The fair value of each stock option grant in fiscal 2010 and 2009 to consultants was based upon the fair value of services rendered to the Company. No stock options were granted to employees in fiscal 2010, and in fiscal 2009, the fair value of stock options granted to employees was estimated on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: annual dividends of $-0-, expected volatility of 178%, risk-free interest rate of 1.5%, and expected life of up to five years, depending on the individual grant. The weighted-average fair value of all stock options granted in 2010 and 2009 was $.63 and $1.80, respectively.

As the stock-based compensation expense recognized on the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, such amount has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. ASC 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation" requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on the Company's historical experience.

With the above valuation methods, the total value of stock options granted in 2010 and 2009 was approximately $14,000 and $204,000, respectively, which are amortized ratably over the related vesting periods, which ranged from immediate vesting to five years.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements-a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force" ("ASU 2009-13"). ASU 2009-13 updates the existing multiple-element revenue arrangements guidance currently included under ASC 605-25, which originated primarily from the guidance in EITF Issue No. 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables" ("EITF 00-21"). The revised guidance primarily provides two significant changes: 1) eliminates the need for objective and reliable evidence of the fair value for the undelivered element in order for a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting, and 2) eliminates the residual method to allocate the arrangement consideration. In addition, the guidance also expands the disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. ASU 2009-13 will be effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted provided that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. We have evaluated the ASU and do not believe it will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

F-12

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

1.	Description of Business and Summary of Accounting Principles (Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

In January 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-6, "Improving Disclosures about Fair Measurements". ASU 2010-6 provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, originally issued as FASB Statement No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" that require separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the presentation of separate information regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2010-6 provides amendments to subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-6 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-2 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated results of operation and financial condition.

In February 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-9 Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements." ASU 2010-9 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC's requirements. The adoption of ASU 2010-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated results of operation and financial condition.

2.	Going Concern Matters and Realization of Assets

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. However, the Company has sustained substantial losses from its continuing operations in recent years and as of November 30, 2010 has negative working capital of $16,483,695 and a stockholders’ equity deficiency of $17,809,271. In addition, the Company is unable to meet its obligations as they become due and sustain its operations. Further, the Company is having difficulty in raising capital and borrowing funds and the Company’s long-term debt described in Note 5 is past due and payable upon demand by the lender. The Company expects its operating losses and cash deficits from operations to continue through fiscal 2011. The Company believes that its existing cash resources are not sufficient to fund its continuing operating losses, capital expenditures, lease and debt payments and working capital requirements. Furthermore, the Company has been unable to provide its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Information Officer with the cash compensation levels that it agreed to pay them. If either officer ceases to work for the Company, it may have to discontinue operations. As a result, the Company will need to raise additional cash through some combination of borrowings, sale of equity or debt securities or sale of assets to enable it to meet its cash requirements.

F-13

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

2.	Going Concern Matters and Realization of Assets (Continued)

The Company may not be able to raise sufficient additional debt, equity or other cash on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure to generate sufficient revenues, achieve certain other business plan objectives or raise additional funds could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position, including its ability to continue as a going concern, and may require it to significantly reduce, reorganize, discontinue or shut down its operations.

In view of the matters described above, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company which, in turn, is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financing requirements on a continuing basis, and to succeed in its future operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in its existence. Management’s plans include:

1. Seeking to raise $150,000 in debt or equity in the near term, and additional equity later in the year. With additional cash available to the Company, it can cover monthly cash losses and allocate funds toward marketing its products to achieve additional sales and consequently cut monthly operating losses.

2. Seeking to raise debt or equity to replace its current lender. The Company’s lender has been negotiating with investors who are interested in purchasing its debt at a discount. There can be no assurance that an investor will be successful in purchasing the debt or that the investor will restructure such debt in a manner that is significantly favorable to the Company. Any offer to purchase the debt must be approved by the lender’s credit committee.

3. Continuing to develop new uses and distribution channels for voice-over-IP-enabled mobile phone service (“Mobile VoIP”). The Company’s Mobile VoIP product currently runs on several Nokia smart phones. It is also an application that can be downloaded to hundreds of mobile devices, and industry analysts estimate that more than 100 million of such devices are currently in use by consumers.

4. Continue to develop new distribution channels for the Ojo Vision VoIP video phone. Management estimates that positive cash flow from operations will be reach upon the addition of 5,000 video phone customers utilizing our VoIP service. The Company sells this product on various web sites, through agents and a multi-level marketing firm.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our business plan objectives or that we will achieve or maintain cash-flow-positive operating results. If we are unable to generate adequate funds from operations or raise additional funds, we may not be able to repay our existing debt, continue to operate our network, respond to competitive pressures or fund our operations. As a result, we may be required to significantly reduce, reorganize, discontinue or shut down our operations. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.

F-14

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

3.	Property and Equipment

	2010		2009

Computer equipment and software	$	-	$	1,445,861

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		-		1,445,861

	$	-	$	-

At November 30, 2009, the Company deemed all of its property and equipment impaired and recorded an impairment loss of $784,913. The Company had no property and equipment additions in fiscal 2010 and all fully depreciated equipment and software was written off during the year ended November 30, 2010.

4. Deferred Finance Costs

	2010		2009

Gross asset	$	-	$	1,192,041
Less accumulated amortization		-		1,192,041

	$	-	$	-

Amortization expense of deferred finance costs for the years ended November 30, 2009 was $298,951. At November 30, 2009, the Company deemed the remaining book value of deferred finance costs to be impaired since the related debt is callable by its lender and recorded an impairment loss of $248,989.

5.	Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations

The following table summarizes components of long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of November 30, 2010:

Principal lender:	2010		2009		Interest Rate

Note dated November 30, 2005	$	2,261,281	$	2,148,125		5.25%
Note dated May 31, 2006		1,642,059		1,559,748		5.25%
Note dated September 28, 2007		5,153,932		4,697,200		9.75%
Note dated May 28, 2008		2,230,658		1,864,895		20.00%
Note dated October 29, 2008		1,414,968		1,232,212		15.00%
Note date February 15, 2009		792,064		672,671		20.00%
Note dated October 6, 2009		11,634		10,124		5.25%
Note dated November, 2009		52,849		50,190		5.25%

Total principal lender debt		13,559,445		12,235,165

Short-term borrowings		487,576		-		12.00% - 24.00%
Capital lease obligations		83,457		142,087		12.00% - 17.00%

Total	$	14,130,578	$	12,377,252

F-15

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

5.	Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations (Continued)

Debt with Principal Lender

As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company owed its principal lender $13,559,445 and $12,235,165 respectively. All of such debt became due by its terms on September 30, 2010. As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had not made payments of principal and interest when due, and was in default of its agreements with its principal lender. Since the debt was callable at the option of the lender at November 30, 2009, amortization of the remaining debt discount of $4,256,477 was recorded during the year ended November 30, 2009, so that the carrying amount of the debt is equal to the face value of the notes plus accrued interest. In connection with this debt, in prior years, the Company had issued warrants to its lender. The Company determined that the warrants issued to the lender in connection with all financings represented derivatives, and as the warrant provided for a potential cash settlement, it was classified as debt. Accordingly, the Company initially recorded the fair value of these derivatives as a debt discount and a liability on its consolidated balance sheet. The discounts were being amortized to interest expense using the “Effective Interest Method” of amortization over the term of the related indebtedness. For the year ended November 30, 2009, due to a significant drop in the price of the Company’s common stock, a lack of trading in the Company’s common stock, the uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue in business, its inability to obtain additional financing, its continued losses and financial position and other factors, the Company determined the fair value of all warrants issued to its lender was zero. Fair value for this purpose is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. At November 30, 2009, the warrant liability recorded on the Company’s books was decreased by $6,030,021 to $0 with a corresponding credit to other income. During the year ended November 30, 2010, the warrants were cancelled by the lender. In connection with the financings, the Company has agreed, so long as 25% of the principal amount of the financings are outstanding, to certain restrictive covenants, including, among others, that the Company will not declare or pay any dividends, issue any preferred stock that is subject to mandatory redemption prior to the one year anniversary of the maturity date as defined in the agreement, redeem any of its preferred stock or other equity interests, dissolve, liquidate or merge with any other party unless, in the case of a merger, the Company is the surviving entity, materially alter or change the scope of the Company’s business incur any indebtedness except as defined in the agreement, or assume, guarantee, endorse or otherwise become directly or contingently liable in connection with any other party’s obligations. To secure the payment of all obligations to the lender, the Company entered into a Master Security Agreement that assigns and grants to the lender a continuing security interest and first lien on all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.

F-16

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

5.	Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations (Continued)

Short-Term Borrowings and Capital Lease Obligations

The Company is in default on substantially all its capital lease obligations and has recorded such obligations as current obligations. Short-term borrowings include demand notes from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer of $459,339, at annual interest rates of ranging from 12% and 24%.

On October 29, 2010, the Company issued convertible debt in the amount of $81,562 to settle trade payables for the same amount. The debt is convertible at a discount of 50% to the common share price, with share issuance based on the average of the three lowest trading prices of the Company’s common stock for the ten days prior to conversion through the maturity date of April 29, 2011. The Company determined that the conversion option should be classified as a derivative liability as the number of shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option is undeterminable. The conversion option and the related instruments were initially valued at $71,100 using the Black Scholes method (expected term of .5 years, risk free rate of .14% and volatility of 351%) and this amount was recorded as a debt discount and derivative liability (included under the caption Accounts payable and other current liabilities). As of November 30, 2010, $29,000 of debt had been converted into 880,785 shares of common stock. At November 30, 2010, the derivative liability on the remaining debt had been adjusted to a marked to market value of $70,519, using the Black Scholes method (expected term of .42 years, risk free rate of .14%, and volatility of 367%), with a mark to market charge of $28,419 being recognized in the Company’s consolidated statement of loss (included under the caption Other, net). The note discount is being amortized using the effective interest method over 4 months, the expected term of the conversion option, and interest expense of $17,775 was recognized during the year ended November 30, 2010.

6. Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures of financial instruments on a recurring basis.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1

inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2

inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3

inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

F-17

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

6. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Determination of Fair Value

Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company bases its fair value on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there exists limited or no observable market data and, therefore, are based primarily upon management’s own estimates, are often calculated based on current pricing policy, the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other such factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, that could significantly affect the results of current or future value.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value (disclosures required by the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification).

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, capital lease obligations

The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt

At November 30, 2010 and 2009, long-term debt was carried at its face value plus accrued interest due to the fact that the debt is fully callable by the lender. During the year ended November 30, 2009, since the debt became callable, remaining unamortized debt discount was fully expensed as interest. Based on the financial condition of the Company, it is impracticable for the Company to estimate the fair value of the long-term debt.

Warrant Liabilities

At November 30, 2009, management determined that, based on the various factors listed in Note 5, the value of the warrant liability was $0 at November 30, 2009. As many of the factors used to determine the fair value are based on unobservable inputs, the Company accordingly, classified the fair value measurement of the warrant liability at Level 3 at November 30, 2009.

F-18

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

6. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Liabilities Measured and Recognized at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the amounts of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of November 30, 2010 and 2009.

Derivative Liability

The fair value of the derivatives that are traded in less active over-the counter markets are generally measured using pricing models with market observable inputs such as interest rates and equity index levels. These measurements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value of hierarchy.

	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

November 30, 2010

Derivative liability	$	70,519		-	$	70,519		-

November 30, 2009

Warrant liabilities		-		-		-		-

Changes in Level 3 Instruments for the Year Ended November 30, 2009

The table below summarizes the activity for liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the year ended November 30, 2009:

December 1, 2009	$	-

Net realized/unrealized gains included in income		(6,030,021	)

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements		408,951

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		5,621,070

November 30, 2009	$	-

The Company has no instruments with significant off balance sheet risk.

7.	Income Taxes

At November 30, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax purposes of approximately $34,000,000 expiring in the years 2011 through 2030. Utilization of the net operating losses may be subject to annual limitation provided by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and similar State provisions.

F-19

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

7.	Income Taxes (Continued)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of November 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

	2010		2009
Deferred tax assets, net:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	11,550,000	$	11,000,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts		50,000		70,000
Stock based compensation		300,000		150,000
Accrued pension		470,000		430,000
Property, plant and equipment		60,000		110,000
Interest		810,000		550,000
Other		220,000		190,000
		13,460,000		12,500,000
Valuation allowance		13,460,000		12,500,000

Net deferred assets	$	-	$	-

The valuation allowance increased to $13,460,000 at November 30, 2010 from $12,500,000 at November 30, 2009.

The following is a reconciliation of the tax provisions for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009 with the statutory Federal income tax rates:

	Percentage of Pre-Tax Income
	2010			2009

Statutory Federal income tax rate		(34.0	)%		(34.0	)%

Loss generating no tax benefit		34.0			34.0

Permanent differences		-			-

		-			-

The Company did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits as of November 30, 2010 and 2009. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. The Company recorded no interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits as of and during the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as taxes by various state jurisdictions. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the federal and state jurisdictions for the years ending November 30, 2007 through 2010.

F-20

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

8. Pension Plans

The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan covering approximately 40 former employees. The Company’s funding policy with respect to the defined benefit plan is to contribute annually not less than the minimum required by applicable law and regulation to cover the normal cost and to fund supplemental costs, if any, from the date each supplemental cost was incurred. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date, but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The Company was unable to make the required pension contributions and the Plan no longer has any assets and the Company relies on the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (“PBGC”) to fund the pension payments from the plan. The Company uses a November 30 measurement date for its pension plan.

Effective June 30, 1995, the plan was frozen, ceasing all benefit accruals and resulting in a plan curtailment. As a result of the curtailment, it has been the Company’s policy to recognize the unfunded status of the Plan as of the end of the fiscal year with a corresponding charge or credit to earnings for the change in the unfunded liability. Pension expense amounted to $128,379 and $426,553 for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009.

Obligations and Funded Status at November 30:

Pension Benefits	2010			2009

Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	(1,345,612	)	$	(990,846	)
Interest cost		(69,398	)		(75,983	)
Actuarial gain (loss)		585			(324,836	)
Benefits paid		45,030			46,053

Benefits obligation at end of year	$	(1,369,395	)	$	(1,345,612	)

Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	78,727		$	108,514
Actual return on plan assets		(44,535	)		(25,734	)
Employer contribution		10,838			42,000
Benefits paid		(45,030	)		(46,053	)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	-		$	78,727

Funded status		$	(1,369,395	)		$	(1,266,885	)
Net amount recognized		$	(1,369,395	)		$	(1,266,885	)

F-21

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

8. Pension Plans (Continued)

Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:

	2010			2009

Accrued benefit cost	$	(1,369,395	)	$	(1,266,885	)
Net amount recognized	$	(1,369,395	)	$	(1,266,885	)

The accumulated benefit obligation for the Company’s defined benefit pension plan was $1,369,395 and $1,345,612 at November 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Information required for a pension plan with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:

	November 30
	2010			2009

Projected benefit obligation	$	(1,369,395	)	$	(1,345,612	)
Accumulated benefit obligation		(1,369,395	)		(1,345,612	)
Fair value of plan assets		-			78,727

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

	2010			2009

Interest cost	$	69,398		$	75,983
Expected return on plan assets		(4,864	)		(8,410	)
Amortization of net loss		51,905			42,924

Net periodic benefit cost	$	116,439		$	110,497

Assumptions

Weighted-average assumptions used

to determine net periodic benefit

cost as of November 30:

	2010		2009

Discount rate		5.10%		5.58%
Expected long-term return on plan assets		N/A		8.00%

The expected return on Plan assets should remain constant from year to year since the long-term expectation should not change significantly based on a single year’s experience. A rate of 8% was adopted for this purpose for 2009, however since the Plan no longer has any assets, there is no expected rate used in the calculation for 2010.

F-22

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

8. Pension Plans (Continued)

Plan Assets

The Company’s pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at November 30, 2010 and 2009, by asset category are as follows:

	November 30
	2010			2009
Asset Category
Equity securities		0	%		7.0	%
Other – cash		0	%		93.0	%

Total		0	%		100.0	%

Equity securities include the Company’s common stock in the amounts of approximately $0 and $5,779 (7.3% of plan assets) at November 30, 2010 and 2009.

Cash flows – Contributions

The Company does not expect to make the required quarterly contributions to its defined benefit plan in fiscal 2011 and is in the process of having the PBGC take over the operations and funding of the plan. Beginning in September 2010 the PBGC has been funding the monthly benefit payments of $3,773.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The following pension benefit payments are expected to be paid by the PBGC:

Years ended November 30,

2011	$	52,580
2012		52,318
2013		61,480
2014		71,418
2015		70,100
2019-2019		516,250

	$	824,146

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan for the benefit of all eligible employees, as defined. The plan provides for voluntary contributions not to exceed the statutory limitation provided by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company may make discretionary contributions. There were no contributions made for the years ended November 30, 2010 and 2009.

F-23

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases facilities under operating lease agreements that can be canceled with 30-day advance notice.

Rent expense was approximately $43,000 and $147,000 in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition to the annual rent, in fiscal 2009, the Company paid real estate taxes, insurance and other occupancy costs on its leased facilities.

Capital Lease Obligations

The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases with lease terms through 2011. Obligations under capital leases have been recorded in the accompanying financial statements at the present value of future minimum lease payments, discounted at interest rates ranging from 11.7% to 25.4% (see Note 5).

Litigation

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, is not likely to have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company. However, as the outcome of litigation or legal claims is difficult to predict, significant changes in the estimated exposures could occur.

10. Stockholders’ Equity

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.10 per share, with rights and privileges to be determined by the Board of Directors. The Company has 150,000,000 authorized shares of its common stock. The authorized shares were increased to 250,000,000 by a shareholder vote on May 13, 2009, but the Company has not yet filed an amendment with New York State to reflect the increase in authorized shares due to the cost of the filing. The Company was originally required to increase its authorized shares due to the number of warrants held by its lender. However, all of the warrants formerly held by the Company’s lender have been cancelled by the lender and consequently the lender has not required that the amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation be filed with New York State.

On May 13, 2009, the shareholders of the Company approved a proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to effect a reverse split of the Company’s common stock and authorized the Board of Directors (“Board”) to file the amendment at any time prior to the next annual meeting. On February 4, 2010, the Board authorized a reverse split of the common stock on a 1-for-10 basis, whereby the Company issued to each of its stockholders one share of common stock for every 10 shares of common stock held by such stockholder. The reverse split was effective on September 22, 2010. The financial statements as of and for the year ended November 30, 2009 have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the reverse split.

F-24

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

10. Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

The following is a summary of outstanding options:

	Number of Shares	Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding December 1, 2008	1,268,151	$1.00 - $5.80	$	2.10

Granted during year ended November 30, 2009	679,000	$1.70 - $3.00	$	2.40

Exercised/canceled during year ended November 30, 2009	(613,000)	$1.00 - $5.80	$	2.40

Outstanding November 30, 2009	1,334,151	$1.60 - $5.80	$	2.50

Granted during year ended November 30, 2010	956,147	$0.10 - $5.80	$	.63

Exercised/canceled during year ended November 30, 2010	(1,070,104)	$0.10 - $0.36	$	1.12

Outstanding November 30, 2010	1,220,194	$0.10 - $0.58	$	0.23

Options exercisable, November 30, 2010	424,533	$0.10 - $3.30	$	1.61

The following table summarizes information about the options outstanding at November 30, 2010 and 2009:

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Weighted-

Average

Weighted-

Range of

Remaining

Average

Exercise

Number

Contractual

Exercise

Number

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Life (Years)

Price

Outstanding

Price

As of November 30, 2010

$0.10 - $3.30

1,220,194

2.10

$2.09

424,533

$1.61

As of November 30, 2009

$1.00 - $5.80

1,334,151

1.92

$2.30

217,800

$2.50

On October 24, 1996, the shareholders of the Company adopted the eLEC Communications Corp. 1996 Restricted Stock Award Plan (the “Restricted Stock Award Plan”). An aggregate of 40,000 shares of common stock of the Company have been reserved for issuance in connections with awards granted under the Restricted Stock Award Plan. Such shares may be awarded from either authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. The maximum number of shares that may be awarded under the Restricted Stock Award Plan to any individual officer or key employee is 10,000. No shares were awarded during fiscal 2010 and 2009.

F-25

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

10.	Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

As of November 30, 2010 and 2009, warrants were outstanding to purchase up to 3,526,900 and 16,344,354 shares of the Company’s common stock at prices ranging from $.10 to $9.50. The warrants expire on varying dates through November 2020.

On May 27, 2009, the Company issued 4,000 shares of restricted common stock to a company in conjunction with a contractual obligation for investor relation services. The stock was valued at its fair market value of $2.35 a share, or $9,400, on the date that services began and was amortized over a one-month period.

On June 16, 2009, the Company issued 20,000 free-trading shares of stock to its lender in conjunction with a cashless exercise of a warrant.

The Company issued stock options for various services in fiscal 2009 in lieu of making a cash payment. Options for legal, bookkeeping and marketing services provided to VoX Communications were exercised for a total of 126,100 shares of common stock. The Company did not receive full payment for one of the exercises, and consequently the Company has a subscription receivable for $30,500, which has been recorded as a reduction in paid in capital.

During fiscal 2009, the Company also issued 20,000 shares of common stock in exchange for consulting services and 15,000 shares in exchange for bookkeeping services.

On September 10, 2009 the Company’s board of directors approved a private placement of common stock at $0.10 per share. Shares can be issued for a cash payment or in exchange for salary that was earned but not paid for in cash. The Company’s Chief Information Officer and Chief Executive Officer were issued 20,000 and 10,000 shares, respectively, in exchange for unpaid wages, and the Chief Executive Officer also purchased 10,000 shares with a cash payment.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, a board member exercised options to purchase 2,500 shares of stock by surrendering free-trading shares of common stock to pay for the exercise price of such options, resulting in a net issuance of 1,121 shares of common stock.

In December 2009, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock in a private placement to an accredited investor at $1.00 a share and incurred a finder’s fee payable of $2,500 plus a four-year warrant to purchase 2,500 shares of our common stock at $1.20 per share.

F-26

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

10.	Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

In December 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 12,014 shares of common stock to five employees who elected to accept stock in lieu of cash compensation of $12,014.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company issued 120,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options granted under the Company’s 2009 equity incentive plan.

In February 2010, the Company issued 30,000 shares of restricted common stock to an individual in conjunction with a contractual obligation for investor relations services. The stock was valued at its fair market value of $.80 a share, or $24,000, on the date that services began and was amortized over a three-month period.

In April 2010, the Company issued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock to a sales and marketing firm in conjunction with a contractual obligation to sell the Company’s products. The stock was valued at its fair market value of $0.95 a share, or $14,250 on the date that services began and was amortized over a one-month period.

In May 2010, the Company issued 33,000 shares of common stock to a sales and marketing firm in conjunction with a contractual obligation to sell the Company’s products. The stock was valued at its fair market value of $0.65 a share, or $21,450, on the date that services began and was amortized over a one-month period.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options granted under our equity incentive plans.

In May 2010, the Company’s chief executive officer purchased 80,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 160,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $80,000.

In May 2010, the Company’s chief information officer converted unpaid salary expense of $70,000 into 70,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 140,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share.

In June 2010 the Company issued 21,700 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 43,400 shares of common stock to a private investor for a purchase price of $21,700. We also issued 17,500 shares of our common stock to a consultant in conjunction with an option exercise, upon receipt of $17,500, and 40,000 shares to two consultants to satisfy contractual obligations totaling $40,000 with the consultants.

In July 2010 the Company issued 22,007 shares of common stock to settle debts of $22,007. The Company also issued 25,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with exercises of stock option grants, and 125,000 shares of common stock for contractual obligations that we valued at $10,000.

F-27

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

10.	Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

In July and August 2010 the Company issued a total of 50,000 shares of common stock to three consultants in conjunction with sales and marketing services. 20,000 of such shares were valued at its fair market value of $0.80 a share, or $16,000, on the date that services began and was amortized until October 31, 2010. 30,000 of such shares were valued at a contractual price of $1.00 a share, or $30,000, on the date that services began and were amortized over a three-month period.

In September 2010 the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock to a marketing consultant in exchange for a one-year service agreement. The stock was valued at its fair market value of $0.36 a share, or $14,400, on the date that services began and is being amortized over a 12-month period. The Company also issued 100,000 shares to a consultant for acquisition services. The stock was valued at its fair market value of $0.55 a share, or $55,000, on the date that services began and was amortized over a one-month period.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, Company issued 685,761 shares of common stock with a fair market value of $138,474 to settle accounts payable of $49,822 resulting in a loss of $88,652 included in the other income (expense) caption on the consolidated statements of loss.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options granted under the Company’s 2010 equity incentive plan.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company’s chief executive officer purchased 945,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,890,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $109,000.

In November 2010, the Company’s chief information officer converted unpaid salary expense of $50,000 into 500,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share.

Subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, the Company issued stock and warrants to purchase stock in conjunction with a private placement of securities. In December 2010 the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, to a private investor for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000. In January 2010 the 2010 the Company issued 350,000 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 700,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, to the Company’s chief executive officer for an aggregate purchase price of $35,000.

In December 2010, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options granted under the Company’s equity incentive plans.

F-28

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

10.	Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

In December 2010 the Company issued 1,797,131 shares of common stock to settle debts of $43,700. In January 2011 the Company issued 1,687,045 shares of common stock to settle debts of $27,500. In February 2011, the Company issued 3,458,161 shares of common stock to settle debts of $45,892. Through March 15, 2011, the Company issued 562,338 shares of stock in March 2011 to settle debts of $7,029.

The Company issued a one-year $50,000 convertible debenture to a non-affiliate on December 24, 2010, with interest payable at 12% per annum. Conversion features allow the holder to convert into shares of the Company’s common stock at a 50 percent discount to the trading price of the common stock, as defined. The Company can pre-pay any portion of the debenture at any time at a 25 percent premium to the principal amount that is retired.

11. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Earnings (loss) per common share data was computed as follows:

	2010			2009

Net loss	$	(3,407,214	)	$	(5,013,983	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding		3,410,748			2,692,186
Effect of dilutive securities, stock options and preferred stock		-			-
Weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding		3,410,748			2,692,186

Loss per common share – basic	$	(1.00	)	$	(1.86	)

Loss per common share – diluted	$	(1.00	)	$	(1.86	)

F-29

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

12. Risks and Uncertainties

The Company has created a proprietary IP telephony network and has transitioned from a reseller of traditional wireline telephone services into a facilities-based broadband service provider to take advantage of the network cost savings that are inherent in an IP network. Although the IP telephony business continues to grow, the Company faces strong competition. The Company has built its IP telephony business with significantly less financial resources than many of its competitors. The survival of the business is currently dependent upon the success of the IP operations. Future results of operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect future operating results and cash flows and cause actual results to vary materially from historical results include, but are not limited to:

The availability of additional funds to successfully pursue our business plan;

The cooperation of our lender who has not demanded repayment of our debt that was due in October 2010;

Our ability to market our services to current and new customers and generate customer demand for our products and services in the geographical areas in which we operate;

The cooperation of industry service partners that have signed agreements with us;

The ability to comply with provisions of our financing agreements;

The highly competitive nature of our industry;

The acceptance of telephone calls over the Internet by mainstream consumers;

Our ability to retain key personnel;

Our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate;

Our ability to maintain, attract and integrate internal management, technical information and management information systems;

The impact of adverse tax or regulatory rulings or actions affecting our operations, including the imposition of taxes, fees and penalties;

Our ability to manage rapid growth while maintaining adequate controls and procedures;

The availability and maintenance of suitable vendor relationships, in a timely manner, at reasonable cost;

The decrease in telecommunications prices to consumers;

General economic conditions.

F-30

PERVASIP CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009

13. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

	2010		2009

Trade payables	$	1,077,641	$	875,030
Payable from sale of subsidiaries		796,499		796,499
Customer deposits		155,101		147,600
Other, individually less than 5% of current liabilities		486,528		454,552

	$	2,515,769	$	2,273,681

When the Company sold certain subsidiaries in December 2006, the Company agreed to reimburse the purchaser for certain disputed claims on the books of the subsidiaries, if the sold subsidiaries were required to pay such claims. At November 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company has recorded a payable of $796,499 in conjunction with the sale of the subsidiaries. If claims are reduced or eliminated by the subsidiaries, and the purchaser provides the Company with appropriate documentation that the Company’s liability has been reduced, such reduction will be reflected on the books of the Company.

14. Related Party Transactions

The Company paid fees to a software consulting firm (“Consultant”) of $252,000 and $253,000 in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. All such work performed by the Consultant is the property of the Company. The Company has hired individuals who were performing work for the Company on behalf of the Consultant, and during fiscal 2007, the Company hired the owner of the Consultant. An officer of the Company has performed work for the Consultant, including disbursement services, in which funds that were remitted by the Company to the Consultant were subsequently transferred to a company controlled by the officer to distribute such funds to appropriate vendors. The Company officer received fees from the Consultant of $55,000 and $60,000 in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total funds paid to the Consultant resulted in capitalized internal use software and computer equipment of $90,000 in fiscal 2009 and none in fiscal 2010. The remaining fees of $162,000 in fiscal 2009 were deemed to be operating costs.

At November 30, 2010, total unpaid salary owed to the Company’s chief executive officer was $306,339, which was converted into unsecured short-term loans bearing interest at 12%. Accrued interest on such loans was $31,575 as of November 30, 2010.

Additionally, from December 1, 2009 to November 30, 2010, the Company’s chief executive officer provided funding to the Company in the amount of $342,000. Of such amount, $188,000 was converted into common stock and $153,000 was provided as unsecured short-term loans bearing interest at 24%. Accrued interest on such loans was $26,483 as of November 30, 2010.

The Company also owes its chief executive officer $117,764 for unreimbursed business expenses, which are included in the Company’s accounts payable balance.

F-31