Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-5725
QUANEX CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
38-1872178
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1900 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77027
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 961-4600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $.50 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
(do not check if a Smaller Reporting Company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of April 30,
2007, computed by reference to the closing price for the Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. on that date, was $1,581,138,379. Such calculation assumes only the registrants
officers and directors were affiliates of the registrant.
At February 21, 2008, there were outstanding 37,295,390 shares of the registrants Common
Stock, $.50 par value.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Quanex Corporation (Quanex, the Company or the Registant) hereby amends its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, originally filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on December 15, 2007 (the Original 10-K), to
include the information required to be disclosed by Part III of Form 10-K. The information set
forth in this Amendment No. 1 to the Original 10-K (this Amendment) replaces the information set
forth in Part III of the Original 10-K in its entirety. This Amendment also amends the cover page
of the Original 10-K to correct a typographical error related to the aggregate market value of the
Companys voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of April 30, 2007. This Amendment further
amends Part II, Item 5 of the Original 10-K to provide corrected high and low sales prices of the
Companys Common Stock during each fiscal quarter within the two most recent fiscal years. No
other Part, Item or section of the Original 10-K is being amended herby.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Quanexs common stock, $.50 par value, is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, under the
ticker symbol NX. The following table presents the high and low sales prices for the Companys
common stock during each fiscal quarter within the two most recent fiscal years
Quarterly Common Stock Sales Price (High & Low Price)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
$ |
39.67 |
|
|
$ |
42.17 |
|
|
|
|
32.91 |
|
|
|
32.41 |
|
April |
|
|
44.99 |
|
|
|
49.02 |
|
|
|
|
37.79 |
|
|
|
38.22 |
|
July |
|
|
55.51 |
|
|
|
44.91 |
|
|
|
|
42.26 |
|
|
|
33.81 |
|
October |
|
|
48.27 |
|
|
|
38.09 |
|
|
|
|
36.47 |
|
|
|
29.15 |
|
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following tables and accompanying information set forth the names of, and certain
information with respect to, each of the directors, executive officers and other significant
employees of the Company.
-1-
Directors. The Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws both provide that
the Board of Directors shall be divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible,
with the terms of office of the classes expiring at different times. The terms of office of Joseph
J. Ross and Richard L. Wellek expire at the 2010 Annual Meeting. The terms of office of Donald G.
Barger, Jr. and Raymond A. Jean expire at the 2009 Annual Meeting. The terms of office of Susan F.
Davis and Joseph D. Rupp expire at the 2008 Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors whose terms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
expire at the 2010 Annual Meeting |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph J. Ross
|
|
Retired since 2004
from Federal Signal
Corporation, a
manufacturer of
safety and
communications
equipment and
specialty vehicles
(Oak Brook,
Illinois)
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Wellek
|
|
Retired since 1999
from Varlen
Corporation, a
manufacturer of
engineered products
supplying the
railroad, light
vehicle, and heavy
duty truck markets
(Naperville,
Illinois)
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors whose terms
expire at the 2009 Annual Meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald G. Barger, Jr.
|
|
Special advisor to
the Chief Executive
Officer of YRC
Worldwide Inc.
(formerly Yellow
Roadway
Corporation), one
of the worlds
largest
transportation
service providers
(Overland Park,
Kansas)
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A. Jean
|
|
Chairman of the
Board, President
and Chief Executive
Officer, Quanex
Corporation
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors whose terms
expire at the 2008 Annual Meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan F. Davis
|
|
Executive Vice
President of Human
Resources of
Johnson Controls,
Inc., a global
leader in
automotive systems,
battery technology
and building
controls
(Milwaukee,
Wisconsin)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph D. Rupp
|
|
Chairman, President
and Chief Executive
Officer of Olin
Corporation, a
basic materials
company
concentrated in
chemicals and
ammunition
(Clayton, Missouri)
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Mr. Ross retired in January 2004 from Federal Signal Corporation. Prior to his retirement, he
served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Federal Signal. Mr. Ross joined
Federal Signal in 1983 as its Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel, assumed the role of Chief Executive
Officer in 1987, and added the Chairmans responsibilities in 1990. Mr. Ross currently serves on
the board of Enodis PLC.
-2-
Mr. Wellek was Chairman of the Board of Prism Financial Corporation until June 2000. Prior to
his tenure with Prism, Mr. Wellek retired as Chairman of the Board from Varlen Corporation, a
manufacturer of engineered transportation products supplying the railroad, light vehicle, and heavy
duty truck markets, where he served in various capacities from 1968 to 1999, including President
and Chief Executive Officer and later, Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Barger is currently serving as a special advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of YRC
Worldwide Inc. (formerly Yellow Roadway Corporation), one of the worlds largest transportation
service providers. Previous, Mr. Barger served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of YRC Worldwide Inc. from December 2000 through August 2007. From March 1998 to December
2000, Mr. Barger was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hillenbrand Industries, a
provider of services and products for the health care and funeral services industries. From 1993 to
1998, Mr. Barger was Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Worthington
Industries, Inc., a diversified steel processor. Mr. Barger currently serves on the board of
Gardner Denver, Inc.
Mr. Jean joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer and was elected to the
Board of Directors in February 2001 and elected Chairman of the Board in May 2001. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Jean was Corporate Vice President and a member of the Board of Directors for
AMSTED Industries, a diversified, privately held manufacturer of railroad, vehicular, construction,
and general industrial products. Prior to joining AMSTED Industries, through its acquisition of
Varlen Corporation in August 1999, Mr. Jean had served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Varlen Corporation, a leading manufacturer of engineered components for transportation markets,
since 1999 and President and Chief Operating Officer since 1997. Mr. Jean currently serves on the
boards of AMSTED Industries and Nicor Inc.
Ms. Davis was elected in September 2006 as Executive Vice President of Human Resources for
Johnson Controls, a global leader in automotive systems, battery technology and building controls.
Ms. Davis previously served as Vice President of Human Resources for Johnson Controls from 1994 to
2006, and in various positions with Johnson Controls, which she originally joined in 1983.
Mr. Rupp has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Olin Corporation since
2005. Prior to his election as Chairman, Mr. Rupp was President and CEO of Olin from 2002 to 2005.
Prior to 2002, Mr. Rupp served in various positions with Olin, which he originally joined in 1972.
Olin is a $2.4 billion NYSE-traded basic materials company concentrated in chemicals and
ammunition.
The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Rupp, Ross, Wellek
and Barger and Ms. Davis have no material relationship with the Company and have satisfied the
independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. In assessing director independence, the
Board of Directors considered the relationships (as a customer or supplier or otherwise) of Quanex
with various companies with which such directors may be affiliated and has determined that none of
these relationships could impair the independence of such directors. In making this assessment,
the Board took into account the level of transactions with such companies in relationship to the
Companys and the other parties aggregate sales, the level of director involvement in such
transactions and the ability of such directors to influence such transactions. In addition, each of
such directors has met the definitions of non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and outside director under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986. There were no arrangements or understandings between any person and any of
the directors pursuant to which such director was selected as a nominee for election at any
meeting, and there are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of
the Company.
-3-
Executive Officers. Set forth below is certain information concerning the executive officers
of the Company, each of whom serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. There is no family
relationship between any of these individuals or any of the Companys directors.
|
|
|
Name and Age |
|
Office and Length of Service |
|
|
|
Raymond A. Jean, 65
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer since 2001 |
|
|
|
Thomas M Walker, 60
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer since 2006 |
|
|
|
Kevin P. Delaney, 46
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel since 2005 and Secretary since
2004 |
|
|
|
John J. Mannion, 41
|
|
Vice PresidentTreasurer since 2004 |
|
|
|
Paul A. Hammonds, 51
|
|
Vice PresidentCorporate Development since 2005 |
|
|
|
Brent L. Korb, 35
|
|
Vice PresidentCorporate Controller since 2005 |
|
|
|
Mark A. Marcucci, 53
|
|
Vice President since 2006 and PresidentMACSTEEL since 2002 |
Mr. Jean was elected Chairman of the Board on May 22, 2001, and was named President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company on February 22, 2001. Prior to that time, Mr. Jean was Corporate
Vice President of Amsted Industries, a diversified, privately held manufacturer of railroad,
vehicular, building, and general industrial products, since 1999. Prior to that time, Mr. Jean was
President and Chief Executive Officer of Varlen Corporation, a leading manufacturer of engineered
components for transportation markets, since 1999 and President and Chief Operating Officer since
1997. Prior to that time, Mr. Jean was Group Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Varlen
since 1993 and Group Vice President since 1988.
Mr. Walker was named Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer on June 12,
2006. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant Energy
Corporation, a multi-national utility holding company, from 1996 to 2003. Mr. Walker initially
joined IES and merged two other entities into what became Alliant. Prior to that time, Mr. Walker
was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, and a member of the Board
of Directors for Information Resources, Inc., a multi-national market research and software
development company, from 1990 to 1995. Prior to that time, Mr. Walker was Vice President of
Finance and Administration, Treasurer and Member of the Board of Directors for Praxis Biologics, a
bio-pharmaceutical firm that was later acquired by American Cyanamid, from 1988 to 1990.
Mr. Delaney was promoted to Senior Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel of the Company on February
24, 2005. Prior to that, he was named Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel of the Company on July 23,
2003, and Secretary on February 26, 2004. Prior to that he was Chief Counsel for Trane Residential
Systems, a business of American Standard Companies, a global manufacturer with market leading
positions in automotive, bath and kitchen and air conditioning systems, since January 2002,
Assistant General Counsel for American Standard Companies since January 2001 and Group Counsel for
The Trane Companys North American Unitary Products Group since 1997. Prior to that time, Mr.
Delaney was Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel with GS Roofing Products Company, Inc. from 1995 to 1997
and Senior Attorney with GTE Directories Corporation from 1991 to 1995.
-4-
Mr. Mannion was named Vice PresidentTreasurer of the Company on August 30, 2004, and prior to
that time was Senior DirectorTreasury from 2002 to 2004, and Senior DirectorFinancial Planning &
Analysis from 1996 to 2002, for ExpressJet Airlines, a commercial airline. Prior to that time, Mr.
Mannion served as DirectorCorporate Finance from 1995 to 1996, and DirectorCorporate Development
from 1994 to 1995, for Continental Airlines. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Mannion was Senior Financial
AnalystFinancial Planning & Analysis for Northwest Airlines.
Mr. Hammonds was named Vice PresidentCorporate Development of the Company on February 24,
2005 and Director of Corporate Business Development on March 11, 2003. Prior to that time, Mr.
Hammonds was Director, Catalog Operations and Supplier Integration for ICG Commerce Inc., a
provider of electronic procurement services, since 2000. For eleven years prior to that Mr.
Hammonds held positions with Grainger Industrial Supply including Product Category Director,
Director of Product Process Development and Division Manager.
Mr. Korb was named Vice PresidentCorporate Controller of the Company on February 2, 2005 and
Assistant Controller on November 24, 2003. Prior to that time, Mr. Korb was Corporate Controller &
Director Business Analysis since 2003, and Manager of Business Analysis since 2001, of Resolution
Performance Products, a manufacturer of specialty chemicals. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Korb held
positions at SCI Management Corporation, a provider of funeral, cremation and cemetery services,
including Director International Finance & Accounting, Manager International Finance & Accounting,
Manager Corporate Development, Manager Strategic Planning, and Financial Analyst.
Mr. Marcucci was named Vice President of the Company on June 1, 2006, and has been President
of the Companys MACSTEEL division since 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Marcucci served MACSTEEL as Vice
President and General Manager from 2001-2002, and as Melting Superintendent, General Manager from
1991 to 2001. Before joining MACSTEEL, Mr. Marcucci was employed at Copperweld Steel Company from
1977 to 1991, where he held various technical and operating roles of increasing responsibility,
including Director of Steelmaking immediately prior to his joining MACSTEEL.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Under SEC rules, the Companys directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more
than 10% of the Companys equity securities are required to file periodic reports of their
ownership, and changes in that ownership, with the SEC. Based solely on its review of copies of
these reports and representations of such reporting persons, the Company believes that all such SEC
filing requirements were satisfied during fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, except as set forth
below.
Through the Quanex Corporation 401K Plan, excess contributions were returned to the plan as a
result of annual discrimination testing on March 5, 2007, by Mr. Michael R. Bayles, a former
executive officer of the Company, of 3.238 shares, Mr. Hammonds of 6.902 shares and by Mr. Delaney
of 1.688 shares that were not reported until May 01, 2007.
Shares were acquired thru dividend reinvestment by Mr. Barger of 12.39 shares on January 8,
2007, 9.957 shares on April 4, 2007, 8.571 shares on July 5, 2007, and 8.992 shares on October 3,
2007, not reported until December 17, 2007.
Restricted Stock Units were paid out upon cessation of services as director, pursuant to the
respective RSU Agreement terms, to Mr. Vincent R. Scorsone of 746 shares on February 27, 2007 and
Mr. Russell M. Flaum of 746 shares on December 12, 2006, neither of which were reported until May
2, 2007.
-5-
Through the Quanex Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, shares were acquired on December 6,
2006 by Mr. Barger of 40.95 shares, Mr. Wellek of 40.95 shares and by Ms. Davis of 40.95 shares
that we not reported until December 12, 2006.
On January 8, 2007, an amended Form 4 was filed for Mr. Scorsone to restate common stock
acquired on January 11, 2005, originally reported as 1,500 shares when the correct amount should
have been 3,000 shares.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The standing committees of our board of directors are an audit committee, a compensation and
management development committee, an executive committee and a nominating and corporate governance
committee, each of which is described below.
Audit Committee
The three audit committee members are Messrs. Barger, who serves as the chairman, Ross and
Wellek, each of whom satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE, and meets the definitions
of non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), and outside director under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986. In addition, Messrs. Barger, Ross and Wellek have each been designated audit committee
financial experts within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5)(ii) and (iii) of Regulation S-K. The audit
committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors which reflects
standards set forth in SEC regulations and NYSE rules. The composition and responsibilities of the
audit committee and the attributes of its members, as reflected in the charter, are intended to be
in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The charter is
reviewed, and amended if necessary, on an annual basis. The full text of the audit committees
charter can be found on our website at www.quanex.com or may be obtained upon request from our
Secretary.
The audit committee selects and appoints the independent public accountants to audit our
financial statements and establishes the scope of, and oversees, the annual audit. The audit
committee also approves any other services provided by public accounting firms. The audit committee
provides assistance to the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to the stockholders,
the investment community and others relating to the integrity of our financial statements, our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditors qualifications and
independence and the performance of our internal audit function. The audit committee also oversees
our system of disclosure controls and procedures and system of internal controls regarding
financial, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management and the board have established.
In doing so, it is the responsibility of the audit committee to maintain free and open
communication between the audit committee and our independent auditors, the internal accounting
function and management of our company.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The nominating and corporate governance committee members are Messrs. Ross, who serves as
chairman, Rupp and Wellek, each of whom satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE. The
chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee also serves as the boards lead
director. The nominating and corporate governance committee develops and maintains qualification
criteria and procedures for the identification and recruitment of candidates for election to serve
as directors. The committee also makes recommendations to our board of directors regarding the
structure and membership of the other board committees, annually reviews director compensation and
benefits and oversees annual self-evaluations of our board of directors and committees. The full
text of the nominating and corporate governance committees charter can be found on our website at
www.quanex.com or may be obtained upon request from our Secretary.
-6-
Executive Committee
The executive committee members are Messrs. Jean, who serves as chairman, Ross and Barger.
When necessary, this committee acts on behalf of our board of directors between regularly scheduled
meetings of the board of directors.
Compensation and Management Development Committee
The compensation and management development committee members are Ms. Davis, who serves as
chairman, and Messrs. Barger and Wellek, all of whom satisfy the independence requirements of the
NYSE and meet the definitions of non-employee director under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act
and outside director under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. As further
detailed in the compensation and management development committees charter, the committees
primary responsibilities include administering our incentive compensation plans, determining
compensation arrangements for all of our executive officers, making recommendations to the board of
directors concerning our compensation policies and ensuring that appropriate management development
and succession processes are in place. The full text of the compensation and management
development committees charter can be found on our website at www.quanex.com or may be obtained
upon request from our Secretary.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors and
employees, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, which is a code of
ethics as defined by applicable SEC rules. This code is publicly available on our website at
www.quanex.com or may be obtained upon request from our Secretary. If we make any amendments to
this code, other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any
waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provisions of this code that apply to our chief
executive officer or chief financial officer and relate to an element of the SECs code of ethics
definition, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom
it applies on our website or in a report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Information Regarding Certification to the NYSE and SEC
On March 2, 2007, Raymond A. Jean, the Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) an annual certification stating that
as of the date thereof he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSEs Corporate
Governance listing standards, as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSEs Listed Company
Manual. In the Original 10-K, the Company filed as an exhibit the certifications relating to the
quality of the Companys public disclosure, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
and included Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
-7-
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
None of our executive officers serve as a member of the compensation committee or as a member
of the board of directors of any other company of which any member of our compensation committee or
board of directors is an executive officer. No member of the Companys Compensation Committee
serves, or has previously served, as an executive officer of the Company.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Philosophy
We strive to be a consistently high performing company. Our compensation plan and pay
strategy were specifically designed to support our key business drivers, such as changes in market
demand for housing and building products as measured by the profit margins of our business and
returns to stockholders, and efficient management of our operations as measured by returns on
capital. These business drivers will allow the Company to meet that objective and maintain a
results-oriented culture. Our business is heavily influenced by changes in market demand for
housing and building products. Changes in demand for our products can significantly affect the
profit margins of our businesses and the returns to shareholders. Other factors that significantly
affect our success include the efficient management of our operations so as to optimize the returns
on capital. We have designed our incentive compensation system to take into account these key
business drivers by focusing the majority of our compensation on variable pay programs, such as our
annual incentive plan. Our incentive compensation programs reward executives for such key
performance indicators as profitability, growth, returns on capital and relative shareholder
returns. We have also established our strategy for base salaries so as to optimize the fixed
components of compensation, thereby allowing our compensation costs to vary according to our
performance in the market.
For example, we review the performance measures annually to make sure they are still relevant
to our strategy. Several years ago when reviewing our business results, we recognized that one of
the keys to improving shareholder value over time was improving our returns on invested capital in
the short term. We acted on this information by making changes to our incentive compensation plan
to reward participants for their performance in this area. Similarly, our performance unit
incentive plan, an element of our long-term incentive program, uses a comparison to our market
peers, who face the same volatile raw material pricing and industry conditions that we do, as one
of the most important indicators of our success or failure. Thus, relative return to shareholders
versus that of peers is one of the key performance measures under the performance unit incentive
plan. Our target performance goal is set so that we must outperform 60% of our peers in order for
any recipient to earn a target award.
The objective of our compensation program for executives is:
|
|
|
To provide competitive total compensation opportunity to our executives |
|
|
|
|
To attract executives who are qualified to perform the duties of their jobs |
|
|
|
|
To retain executives over the long term |
|
|
|
|
To provide incentives for executives to focus their attention and efforts on
achieving goals related to creating long term shareholder value. |
-8-
The Company will employ various programs for achieving the above objectives. These programs will
include:
|
|
|
Base salary intended to compensate executives for their qualifications and the
value of their job in the competitive market |
|
|
|
|
Annual incentive compensation this element of compensation is intended to reward
executives for the achievement of annual goals related to key business drivers. It is
also intended to communicate to executives the key business goals of the Company from
year to year. Currently we regard Return on Invested Capital as the performance
objective that best measures and rewards for short term performance. |
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive compensation this element of compensation is intended to
reward executives for the achievement of longer term goals and the creation of
shareholder value over time. It is also intended to align the interest of executives
with those of our shareholders. Long term incentives are also critical to the
retention of our key employees. For this reason we have placed more value on the
long-term incentive element of compensation than on other elements (for most named
executive officers, this element of compensation comprises at least half of their total
direct compensation). Our long term incentive program will also offer our executives
an opportunity for personal capital accumulation. The long-term incentive element will
consist of the following elements |
|
|
|
Stock options. Options to purchase company stock comprise
approximately half of our long term incentive target value and provide
executives the opportunity to share in the increase in share value over time.
They provide an element of compensation that varies along with changes in share
price over time. These awards also offer our executives the opportunity to
accumulate value (if the stock of the company appreciates) since the growth in
value occurs over a long period of time (up to 10 years), and gains from that
growth are not taxed until such time as the options are exercised. Since we
use staggered vesting over three years for each award, stock options serve a
meaningful role in the retention of our key employees. |
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock. We award Restricted Stock to our executives
which comprise approximately 25% of the long term incentive value of our total
value. Restricted Stock provides meaningful value in retaining our key
executives since they are vested over a three year period and provide a less
volatile linkage to share price performance than stock options. |
|
|
|
|
Performance Units. We award performance units to our
executives which comprise approximately 25% of their long term incentive value.
Performance units are intended to motivate executives to achieve preset goals
that are in line with critical business drivers, such as Earnings Per Share
Growth. These awards also provide incentive for executives to out perform
other companies in their peer group as measured by relative shareholder return. |
-9-
|
|
|
Executive benefits we provide our executives with indirect compensation
opportunities that include: |
|
|
|
Retirement benefits. Our executives will participate in the
Companys defined benefit pension plan, 401(k) defined contribution retirement
plan, and supplemental executive retirement plans. These programs provide
meaningful and competitive post retirement income, contributing to our
compensation strategy by allowing us to compete for talent among companies who
provide similar benefits, and retain executives since these benefits require
executives to remain with the Company to receive the Company provided benefits
available under the plans. |
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance benefits. Our executives participate in Company
provided life insurance coverage including base coverage and supplemental life. |
|
|
|
Perquisites we provide our executives with certain perquisites which help us
compete for executive talent, and in some cases, allow our executives to devote more
attention to the business of the Company. Specific perquisites that an executive might
be provided include: life insurance, financial planning, personal use of automobiles,
memberships in social and professional clubs, and gross-up payments equal to taxes
payable on certain perquisites. Executives also receive company contributions under
our 401(k) plan, a 20% match under our deferred compensation plan, a 15% match under
our employee stock purchase program, and dividends on unvested restricted stock. |
The Company does not have and does not anticipate establishing any policies for allocating
between long-term and currently paid out compensation, or between cash and non cash compensation.
The Company anticipates a process of assessing the appropriate allocation between these elements of
compensation on a periodic basis and adjusting its position based on market conditions.
Compensation Consultant
The Committee engaged Mercer Human Resource Consulting (Mercer) to help with its
responsibilities. Mercer is an outside human resources consulting firm which served as the
Committees independent compensation consultant throughout 2006. At the beginning of 2007, the
Mercer employee most responsible for helping the Committee left Mercer to form a new compensation
consulting firm, Cogent Compensation Partners, Inc. (Cogent). Subsequently, the Committee
decided to retain Cogent for certain services for 2007. Mercer and Cogent have been and remain
truly independent consultants to the Board and are only retained for their consulting services
that relate to executive and director compensation programs.
Prior to 2007, Mercer consultants advised us on our executive compensation and helped develop
and put into place the incentive programs that exist today. They provided independent analyses of
our executive pay, as well as company performance relative to our peer group. Mercer also assisted
in setting target award levels for our annual incentive and long term incentive plans so that they
provide the proper earning opportunity given our strategy and served markets. Mercer consultants
met with the Committee in executive session during Committee meetings which they attended.
Timing of Certain Committee Actions
Salaries for each executive are reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis at the Committees
meeting in December. Salary adjustments are based on the individuals experience and background,
performance during the prior year, the general movement of salaries in the marketplace, and the
Companys financial results.
-10-
Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards are determined and awarded by the Committee at its
regularly scheduled meeting in December. The timing of the Committees meeting is coordinated with
the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors. This has been the Committees practice
for the last 5 years. At this meeting, the Committee approves awards for all equity participants,
executive and non-executives.
Performance awards, both annual and long term, are also determined at the Committees December
meeting, as the financial results for the previous fiscal year are concluded at this time and the
annual operating plan is reviewed by the Board at its December meeting.
Role of Executives in Establishing Compensation
The CEO is the only executive who works with the compensation committee and compensation
consultant in establishing compensation levels and performance targets. The CEO is responsible for
reviewing the compensation of his direct reports. Therefore, he makes recommendations to the
Committee regarding adjustments in compensation to his direct reports. The Committee considers the
CEOs recommendations along with their evaluation of the business and the market. In making his
recommendations, the CEO relies upon his evaluation of his direct reports performance and
competitive compensation information. The CEO does not recommend his own compensation. The
Compensation Committee determines the CEOs salary and incentive awards based upon an assessment of
individual and company performance as well as market data provided by the compensation consultant.
The CEO also recommends Annual Incentive Awards (AIA) performance goals to the Compensation
Committee. The CEO, with input from the compensation consultant, recommends performance goals for
long-term incentive awards that are properly aligned with the business goals and compensation
strategy. The target award values for both annual and long-term incentives are independently
recommended by the compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee. The Committee approves
or modifies these target award levels based on their knowledge of the business and the competitive
market.
The Companys Senior Vice-President and General Counsel serves as the liaison to the Committee
and interfaces with the compensation consultant to carry out the duties of the Compensation
Committee.
Competitive Positioning
Every year the Committee examines the level of competitiveness and overall effectiveness of
the Companys executive compensation program. The Committees independent compensation consultant
helped develop a reference group of industry peers, similar to Quanex in size, complexity, revenue
and market capitalization. The companies that were selected for our peer group include: American
Axle & Mfg. Holdings, Barnes Group Inc., Building Materials Holding Corp., Carpenter Technology
Corp., Dura Automotive Systems, Gibraltar Industries Inc., Modine Manufacturing Inc., Steel
Dynamics Inc., Superior Industries International, Timken Co. and Worthington Industries.
The compensation consultant uses the peer group pay information, along with general industry
survey data, to develop the appropriate range of compensation for each executive. The compensation
consultant also prepares an independent analysis of the Companys key performance indicators such
as profitability, growth, capital efficiency, balance sheet strength, and total return to
shareholders. These results are then reported to the Committee so it has a thorough picture of the
competitiveness of pay in the context of the Companys performance versus its peers. We believe
that this analysis is essential to understanding the market for executive compensation. While the
Committee uses this analysis to help frame its decisions on compensation, it is careful to use its
collective judgment in determining executive pay.
-11-
We expect the Committee to exercise their discretion in making compensation decisions, based
on the following inputs: their understanding of the market conditions, their understanding of the
competitive pay analysis, recommendations from the CEO regarding his direct reports and the
Companys compensation strategy. The Committee will not be bound by the competitive analysis alone
but will use its judgment in interpreting the above factors.
Program Overview
Our executive compensation program includes base salary, annual cash incentive compensation,
long-term incentives and executive benefits. Our long-term incentive program consists of stock
option grants, restricted stock grants and performance unit awards. By design, the majority of
compensation value available to our executives is considered at-risk. That is, the opportunity
to earn value is largely dependent on the executive and the Company meeting certain performance and
value creation goals. We set realistic but challenging goals in our annual incentive and
performance unit plan. In both cases, if the Company fails to meet the pre-determined standards,
no plan-based compensation is earned by executives. The amount of pay that is at-risk for an
executive is directly related to the level of responsibility held by the position. Our highest
ranking executive has the most at-risk pay as a percentage of total compensation.
Under the terms of the Companys AIA and Performance Units, the Compensation Committee may use
negative discretion in adjusting payouts to executives. Since the plan is intended to comply
with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), no upward discretion in determining payouts has occurred
or is contemplated.
Base Salary
We have set the market median reported to us by our compensation consultant as our strategic
target for base salary. This helps keep us competitive without contributing to excessive increases
in this foundational element of compensation. We review each executives salary and performance
every year to determine whether their base salary should be adjusted. Along with individual
performance, we also consider movement of salary in the market, as well as the Companys financial
results from the prior year to determine appropriate salary adjustments. Based on our review of
the market, we are in the aggregate slightly below our stated strategy.
Annual Incentive Compensation
Annual Incentive Awards (AIA) are issued every December pursuant to the Quanex Corporation
2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which was approved by stockholders in 2006 (the Plan). The Plan is
based on achieving pre-set, objective performance measures. Performance against these measures is
used to determine the amount of annual incentive compensation to be awarded to each executive. The
performance measure we use is return on invested capital (ROIC). Motivating executives to achieve
goals related to return on invested capital benefits shareholders, as it motivates members of
management to efficiently employ the capital entrusted to them. We believe, based on research that
has been conducted, that there is a very strong correlation between a companys return on capital
and changes in market value over time.
-12-
The following table shows the range of ROIC goals set for determining this years AIA to our
executives. We set the target performance level for ROIC at a level that represents a reasonable
opportunity of achievement and was driven from our business budgeting process. Our determination
in setting the goal through the budgeting process was based on a number of assumptions about the
state of our markets and material commodity prices. We recognized the volatility in the market
through establishing a range of outcomes around the target.
Return on Invested Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
2007 |
|
|
11.67 |
% |
|
|
16.09 |
% |
|
|
19.57 |
% |
For Fiscal Year 2007 we achieved 15.5% return on invested capital resulting in a payout of 90%
of target.
Based on competitive market practices for annual incentives, we set a target award opportunity
for each of our executives. This is the amount of incentive compensation the executive can earn
when performance meets expected results, or target. The target award is expressed as a
percentage of base salary. The following table shows the potential payout to each of our
executives under the plan.
Potential AIA Payout
Expressed as a % of Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant |
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
CEO |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
200 |
% |
SVPs |
|
|
18.75 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
150 |
% |
President MACSTEEL |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
120 |
% |
VPs |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
We try to set our annual incentive award opportunities so that when superior performance is
achieved, the executive has the opportunity to earn compensation near the markets upper quartile.
This opportunity is only realized when the Companys performance significantly exceeds the
performance goals we have set. We believe that this motivates our executives to outperform the
goals that are set for them, and in turn puts the Company in a position to outperform a large
percentage of its peers. The plan does not provide for an individual performance element.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We have a long-term incentive program in place to help retain key executives and strengthen
their commitment to increasing shareholder value. Having a long-term compensation plan properly
motivates management to look to the future in order to ensure the long-term viability of the
Company. Our long-term compensation is awarded through a number of vehicles, which currently
include stock options, performance units and restricted stock awards. Participation in the program
extends from the senior-most corporate executives to the heads of our divisions. From year to
year, the CEO may recommend adjustments to the value of long-term incentives awarded to the other
Named Executive Officers, based on his assessment of their individual contribution. The plans do
not provide for a specific individual performance component in determining the ultimate value of
the award. The allocation between the
currently used long-term incentive vehicles is determined by the Committee based on the
recommendations from its compensation consultant, input from senior management as to the key
business drivers that allow the Company to maintain a results-oriented culture, and its own
judgment. We evaluate the various components of compensation annually relative to the competitive
market for prevalence and amounts. By setting each of the elements against the competitive market
within the parameters of the Companys compensation strategy, our total pay mix (i.e., the relative
weighting of each element versus the market) will vary by individual.
-13-
We evaluate the various components of compensation annually, relative to the competitive
market for prevalence and amounts. By setting each of the elements against the competitive market
within the parameters of our compensation strategy, the relative weighting of each element of our
total pay mix will vary by individual. We do not anticipate setting fixed percentages for each
element of compensation. The mix may also change over time as the competitive market moves or
other market conditions change which affect the Company.
Stock Options
The Committees decisions related to executive stock option grants are made every December.
In order to determine the number of stock options to be awarded to an executive, the Committee
takes approximately half of the executives total long-term incentive target award value and
divides it by the Merton-Black-Scholes value of an option to purchase Company stock. This strategy
allows for an appropriate balance between our growth strategy and risk profile, and also provides
an appropriate balance for accounting purposes and stock ownership dilution. The Companys stock
options are granted at fair market value on the date of grant, have a term of ten years, and
generally vest over a three year period.
Performance Units
We use a long-term performance unit cash plan to motivate our executives to focus on Company
performance over a three year period. These performance unit awards are granted every December and
comprise approximately 25% of our executives expected total long-term incentive value. Setting
this percentage of long-term value on performance units helps bridge the line of sight for
executives between annual accomplishments and long-term value creation. The performance measures
were chosen to provide incentive for executives to focus on those things which we believe are
directly linked to the creation of shareholder value over time. We set target award values each
year. These target values are used to calculate the number of units that will be granted to each
executive. The final value of each unit is not determined until the end of a three-year
performance cycle. That unit value is dependent on performance of the Company against preset
goals. If the threshold level of performance is not met, no cash payout will occur. However, if
maximum performance goals are met or exceeded, then the value of each unit could reach 200% of the
target value.
Earnings Per Share Growth (or EPS) and Relative Total Shareholder Return (or TSR) are used as
performance criteria for the Performance Units. Each goal is weighted 50% of the total performance
unit award. EPS is measured as the cumulative value of EPS over the performance period (3 years),
and Relative TSR is expressed as the stock price appreciation plus dividends reinvested relative to
appreciation of the Companys peer group.
-14-
The tables below illustrate the threshold, target and maximum performance levels we have set
for our Performance Units.
Annual Earnings Per Share Growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Period |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2007
|
|
8%
|
|
10%
|
|
12% |
Total Shareholder Return
Percentile Rank vs. Peers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Period |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2007
|
|
40th
|
|
60th
|
|
75th |
This method is used because we believe this type of award accomplishes three things: 1) the
award has a strong link to performance measures that influence stock price performance, 2) the time
period used for measurement helps smooth out the effect of stock market volatility and 3) the award
measures Company performance relative to our peer group, providing meaningful context to judge our
performance in the market.
In Fiscal Year 2007, our Performance Unit Award for the performance period beginning Fiscal
Year 2004, paid out at 196% of target. Our results for Annual Earnings Per Share Growth was 57%,
and our Total Shareholder Return was at the 73.7 quartile, resulting in unit value of $195.67.
Restricted Stock
We also grant restricted stock awards to participants as another form of long-term
compensation. The number of restricted stock awards we make to a given participant is determined
by taking 25% of the participants long-term incentive value and dividing it by the stock price at
the time of the award. We chose 25% of the total value because it provides meaningful retentive
value to our key executives, helps smooth out market volatility and is reasonably cost efficient.
The restricted stock awards typically vest three years after the award is granted, so long as the
participant remains employed by the Company. We believe Restricted Stock Awards are an effective
long-term compensation vehicle through which key employees can be retained, especially through
volatile periods in the market.
-15-
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
We encourage our executives to own stock in the Company because we believe it provides strong
alignment of interests between executives and shareholders. Our Executive Stock Ownership
Guidelines provide that different levels of executives are expected to own a specific value of
Quanex stock, expressed as a percentage of salary. The higher an executives rank, the more value
is required to be owned. The chart below shows the guidelines by executive level.
|
|
|
|
|
Level |
|
Typical Executive Position |
|
Stock Ownership Goal |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
CEO
|
|
4x Base Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
SVP
|
|
2x Base Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
VP
|
|
1x Base Salary |
Each year the Committee is apprised of compliance by Quanex executives. Currently, all
executives subject to the guidelines are in compliance.
Executive Benefits
The role of our executive benefits is to provide indirect compensation that is meaningful to
the kind of executives we intend to attract and retain. In some cases our plans replace benefits
that would otherwise be lost because of plan limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Our
strategy with respect to executive benefits is to provide a meaningful benefit to executives at a
cost that is efficient. We attempt to position ourselves at the middle of the market in terms of
the executive benefits we offer. We provide our executives with health and welfare benefits that
are consistent with our program for exempt personnel generally. SERP and supplemental life
benefits are also provided to our officers. A description of these benefits can be found in our
Pension Benefit Table.
Post-Employment Compensation
Severance and change of control benefits are also provided under the employment agreements of
our executives, as well as under our incentive plans. These benefits are discussed at greater
length in the section entitled Potential Payouts upon Termination or Change in Control.
Deferred Compensation Plan
In 1981, the Committee approved a non-qualified deferred compensation program. The program
gives executives a chance to defer income. As with our various other plans and programs, this
deferral opportunity is designed to attract and retain key executives.
The deferred compensation program is administered by the Committee. Before they can
participate, eligible employees must first receive recommendation by senior managers in the Company
and then final approval by the Committee. Participants in the program may choose to defer up to
100% of their annual and long term incentive awards. Participants may choose from a variety of
investment choices in which to invest their deferrals over the defined deferral period. The plan
provides that the Company will match 20% of the annual incentive deferrals invested and retained in
a Company common stock denominated account for a period of three years. For a complete description
of each Named Executive Officers contributions, earnings and aggregate account balance, see the
table entitled Nonqualified Deferred Compensation herein.
-16-
Section 162(m) Tax Deductibility of Pay
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a deduction to public
companies to the extent that over $1 million is paid to certain officers annually, except for
qualified performance-based compensation. Our 2007 annual cash incentive award program and 2007
performance unit program are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation that is not
subject to this 162(m) limitation.
Executive Employment Agreements
Quanex uses employment agreements to define the term of employment for our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This benefits shareholders by adding stability to the
employee-employer relationship, especially during times of uncertainty.
Raymond A. Jean, Chairman of the Board, President & CEO
Mr. Jean was named President and CEO on February 22, 2001, and elected Chairman of the Board
on May 22, 2001. As of October 31, 2007, Mr. Jeans base salary was $740,000. He is also eligible
to earn an annual incentive award based on reaching pre-set performance goals, as described
previously. His target annual incentive is 100% of his base salary. Stock option and other
stock-based grants are also available for grant under our long-term incentive plans, as approved by
the Committee. His long-term incentive opportunity is set at 350% of his base salary. Mr. Jeans
employment agreement provides severance benefits in the event of termination by the company without
cause. Mr. Jean is also eligible to receive severance benefits in the event he is terminated
without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason following a change in control. These
benefits are described in the Post Employment Table.
Thomas M. Walker, SVP Finance & CFO
Mr. Walker was named Senior Vice President Finance and CFO on June 12, 2006. As of October
31, 2007, Mr. Walkers base salary was $335,000. Mr. Walker is eligible to receive an annual
incentive award based on the attainment of performance goals set forth previously and he is also
eligible for stock option and other stock-based grants under the Companys long-term incentive
plans, as approved by the Committee. His long-term incentive opportunity is set at 225% of his
base salary. Mr. Walkers employment agreement provides severance benefits in the event of
termination by the company without cause. Mr. Walker is also eligible to receive severance
benefits in the event he is terminated without cause or he terminates his employment for good
reason following a change in control. These benefits are described in the Post Employment Table.
Kevin P. Delaney, SVP GC & Secretary
Mr. Delaney was named our Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary on
February 24, 2005. Prior to that, he was named Vice President General Counsel of Quanex
Corporation on July 23, 2003, and Secretary on February 26, 2004. As of October 31, 2007, his
annual base salary was $245,000. Mr. Delaney is eligible to receive an annual incentive award
based on the attainment of performance goals set forth previously and he is also eligible for stock
option and other stock-based grants under the Companys long-term incentive plans, as approved by
the Committee. His long-term incentive opportunity is set at 200% of his base salary. Mr. Delaney
is eligible to receive severance benefits in the event he is terminated without cause or he
terminates his employment for good reason following a change in control. These benefits are
described in the Post Employment Table.
-17-
Mark A. Marcucci, Vice President and President MACSTEEL
Mr. Marcucci was named Vice President of the Company on June 1, 2006, and has been President
of the Companys MACSTEEL division since 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Marcucci served MACSTEEL as Vice
President and General Manager from 2001 2002, and as a Melting Superintendent, General Manager
from 1991 to 2001. His base salary on October 31, 2007 was $275,000. Mr. Marcucci is eligible to
receive an annual incentive award based on the attainment of performance goals set forth previously
and he is also eligible for stock option and other stock-based grants under the Companys long-term
incentive plans, as approved by the Committee. His long-term incentive opportunity is set at 200%
of his base salary. Mr. Marcucci is eligible to receive severance benefits in the event he is
terminated without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason following a change in
control. These benefits are described in the Post Employment Table.
Brent L. Korb, Vice President Corporate Controller
Mr. Korb has served as Vice President Corporate Controller of Quanex Corporation since
February 1, 2005 and as Assistant Controller since November 23, 2003. Mr. Korbs base salary on
October 31, 2007 was $173,000. Mr. Korb is eligible to receive an annual incentive award based on
the attainment of performance goals set forth previously and he is also eligible for stock option
and other stock-based grants under the Companys long-term incentive plans, as approved by the
Committee. His long-term incentive opportunity is set at 85% of his base salary. Mr. Korb is
eligible to receive severance benefits in the event he is terminated without cause or he terminates
his employment for good reason following a change in control. These benefits are described in the
Post Employment Table.
Compensation Committee Report On Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management.
Based upon our review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Form 10-K/A.
Submitted by the Compensation and Management Development Committee:
Susan F. Davis, Chairwoman
Donald G. Barger, Jr.
Richard L. Wellek
Dated February 25, 2008
-18-
Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information about the compensation of the Companys Chief Executive
Officer, its Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated individuals who
were officers during the fiscal year ending October 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
|
Stock Awards (1) |
|
|
Option Awards (1) |
|
|
Compensation (2) |
|
|
Earnings (3) |
|
|
Compensation (4) |
|
|
Total |
|
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
735,417 |
|
|
|
1,056,193 |
|
|
|
1,264,651 |
|
|
|
1,503,050 |
|
|
|
578,000 |
|
|
|
125,866 |
|
|
|
5,263,177 |
|
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
333,750 |
|
|
|
96,611 |
|
|
|
149,894 |
|
|
|
225,216 |
|
|
|
116,000 |
|
|
|
50,390 |
|
|
|
971,861 |
|
Senior Vice President -
Finance and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
243,333 |
|
|
|
115,790 |
|
|
|
167,839 |
|
|
|
340,302 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
33,175 |
|
|
|
922,439 |
|
Senior Vice President -
General Counsel & Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
272,458 |
|
|
|
143,411 |
|
|
|
166,392 |
|
|
|
98,236 |
|
|
|
61,000 |
|
|
|
28,084 |
|
|
|
769,581 |
|
Vice President & President -
MACSTEEL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
171,333 |
|
|
|
46,632 |
|
|
|
62,204 |
|
|
|
61,662 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
22,662 |
|
|
|
368,493 |
|
Vice
President - Corporate
Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These columns show respectively, the dollar amounts for restricted stock and
stock options recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to
fiscal year 2007 in accordance with FAS 123(R) and thus includes amounts for restricted
stock and stock option grants in and prior to fiscal 2007. A discussion of the
assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 15 to our audited
financial statements on form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007. Expense is
recognized over the course of the requisite service period unless the individual is
eligible to retire prior to the end of the vesting period. During fiscal 2007, stock
options for Mr. Jean, who became eligible to retire in fiscal 2006, are expensed on the
date of grant as a result of his retirement eligibility. These amounts reflect the
Companys accounting expense for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to the
actual value that may be recognized by named executive officers. Please see the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for information regarding the restricted stock and
option awards granted in fiscal 2007. |
-19-
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Amounts consist of (a) payments for fiscal 2007 performance made in December 2007 for
Annual Incentive Awards (AIA), and (b) amounts paid out in December 2007 with respect to
Performance Units (PUs) granted in December 2004. These units were paid out in cash
based on the Companys performance over the three-year period ended October 31, 2007.
The AIA and PU payouts also include the dollar value of the portion of the amounts
deferred under the Companys Deferred Compensation (DC) Plan. Under the terms of the DC
Plan, participants may elect to defer a portion of their incentive award to a mix of
cash, or notional common stock units or investment accounts. The amounts paid for the
AIA and PUs, along with the respective deferred amounts are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Incentive Awards |
|
|
Performance Unit Payout |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Deferred |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Jean |
|
|
661,683 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
841,367 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Walker |
|
|
225,216 |
|
|
|
112,608 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Delaney |
|
|
164,202 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
176,100 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Marcucci |
|
|
98,236 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Korb |
|
|
61,662 |
|
|
|
15,416 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a detailed discussion of the
performance measures and related outcomes for payments of the awards.
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The amounts in this column are the change in actuarial present value of each
individuals accumulated benefit under all defined benefit pension plans. The change
in pension value reflects the difference in the present value of accumulated benefits
determined as of October 31, 2006 and October 31, 2007. The key assumptions used to
calculate the change in value are shown with the Pension Benefits Table. No named
executive officer received preferential or above-market earnings on deferred
compensation. |
|
(4) |
|
The executives named above receive various perquisites provided by or paid for
by the Company. These perquisites can include life insurance, financial planning,
personal use of automobiles, memberships in social and professional clubs, and gross up
payments equal to taxes payable on certain perquisites. Also included are Company
contributions under the Companys 401(k) plan, a 20% match under the Companys DC plan,
a 15% match under the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Program (ESPP), and dividends
on unvested restricted stock. The amounts reported in Other Annual Compensation for
the executives named above are: |
All Other Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance > |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50,000 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance > |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Club |
|
|
Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
ESPP 15% |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$50,000 |
|
|
Planning |
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
Membership |
|
|
Gross Up |
|
|
401K Match |
|
|
Plan Match |
|
|
Stock Match |
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Jean |
|
|
33,071 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
11,824 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
24,704 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,322 |
|
|
|
125,866 |
|
Walker |
|
|
11,543 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
11,134 |
|
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
7,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,648 |
|
|
|
50,390 |
|
Delaney |
|
|
3,218 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
12,205 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
33,175 |
|
Marcucci |
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
7,560 |
|
|
|
28,084 |
|
Korb |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
5,481 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
22,662 |
|
-20-
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table discloses the estimated range of payouts that were possible for the fiscal
year 2007 Annual Incentive Awards. It also shows the actual number of stock options, restricted
stock awards, and Performance Units granted during fiscal 2007. The fair value of these awards is
shown, along with the possible range of payouts for the Performance Units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise or |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under |
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity |
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Base Price of |
|
|
of Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonequity |
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards |
|
|
Stock or |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Option |
|
|
and Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
|
Threshold |
|
|
Target |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Units (3) |
|
|
Options (3) |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Awards (4) |
|
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Plan (#) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($/Sh) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,854 |
(1) |
|
|
735,417 |
(1) |
|
|
1,470,833 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
(2) |
|
|
225,000 |
(2) |
|
|
600,000 |
(2) |
|
|
1,200,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655,725 |
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,600 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
995,007 |
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,578 |
(1) |
|
|
250,312 |
(1) |
|
|
500,625 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
(2) |
|
|
67,500 |
(2) |
|
|
180,000 |
(2) |
|
|
360,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,591 |
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
308,625 |
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,625 |
(1) |
|
|
182,500 |
(1) |
|
|
365,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
(2) |
|
|
41,250 |
(2) |
|
|
110,000 |
(2) |
|
|
220,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,651 |
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,100 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
186,410 |
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,869 |
(1) |
|
|
163,475 |
(1) |
|
|
326,950 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
(2) |
|
|
45,000 |
(2) |
|
|
120,000 |
(2) |
|
|
240,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,892 |
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,400 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
202,458 |
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,133 |
(1) |
|
|
68,533 |
(1) |
|
|
137,066 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
300 |
(2) |
|
|
11,250 |
(2) |
|
|
30,000 |
(2) |
|
|
60,000 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,410 |
|
|
|
|
12/05/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
54,318 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts shown reflect possible Annual Incentive Award (AIA) payments under
the Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2007, under which
the named executive officers were eligible to receive a cash incentive award based on a
target percentage of base salary. The amounts actually paid to the named executive
officers for 2007 pursuant to this program are reflected in the Summary Compensation
Table herein. Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more
information regarding this program and the related performance measures. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown reflect grants of Performance Units (PUs) under the Quanex
Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The PUs have a three year performance period.
The performance period for the PUs granted on December 5, 2006 is November 1, 2006
through October 31, 2009. Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for
more information regarding the Performance Units and the related performance measures. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown reflect grants of restricted stock awards and stock options
made under the Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan in December 2006. The
stock options are granted at fair market value based on the closing share price as of
the grant date. |
|
(4) |
|
The fair value shown in this column was calculated in accordance with FAS
123(R). A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found
in Note 15 to our audited financial statements on form 10-K for the year ended October
31, 2007. |
-21-
Outstanding Equity Awards
The following table provides information about the outstanding equity awards held by the named
executive officers as of October 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Market Value of |
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Units of Stock |
|
|
Shares or Units of |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Option |
|
|
That Have Not |
|
|
Stock That Have |
|
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Not Vested (6) |
|
Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,600 |
(1) |
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
12/05/16 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
(7) |
|
|
720,825 |
|
|
|
|
20,600 |
|
|
|
41,200 |
(3) |
|
|
40.95 |
|
|
|
12/01/15 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
(8) |
|
|
556,065 |
|
|
|
|
61,500 |
|
|
|
30,750 |
(4) |
|
|
26.31 |
|
|
|
12/01/14 |
|
|
|
19,575 |
(9) |
|
|
806,294 |
|
|
|
|
73,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.60 |
|
|
|
12/03/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
12/04/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
(1) |
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
12/05/16 |
|
|
|
5,300 |
(10) |
|
|
218,307 |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
(2) |
|
|
35.93 |
|
|
|
06/12/16 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
(11) |
|
|
123,570 |
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,100 |
(1) |
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
12/05/16 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
(10) |
|
|
135,927 |
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
(3) |
|
|
40.95 |
|
|
|
12/01/15 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
(12) |
|
|
123,570 |
|
|
|
|
12,450 |
|
|
|
6,225 |
(4) |
|
|
26.31 |
|
|
|
12/01/14 |
|
|
|
4,050 |
(9) |
|
|
166,820 |
|
|
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.60 |
|
|
|
12/03/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.42 |
|
|
|
07/23/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,400 |
(1) |
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
12/05/16 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
(10) |
|
|
148,284 |
|
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
9,500 |
(3) |
|
|
40.95 |
|
|
|
12/01/15 |
|
|
|
3,150 |
(12) |
|
|
129,749 |
|
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
9,375 |
(4) |
|
|
26.31 |
|
|
|
12/01/14 |
|
|
|
6,750 |
(9) |
|
|
278,033 |
|
|
|
|
23,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.60 |
|
|
|
12/03/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
12/04/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,400 |
(1) |
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
12/05/16 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
(10) |
|
|
123,570 |
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
(3) |
|
|
40.95 |
|
|
|
12/01/15 |
|
|
|
900 |
(12) |
|
|
37,071 |
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
(5) |
|
|
35.38 |
|
|
|
02/01/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
(4) |
|
|
26.31 |
|
|
|
12/01/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.40 |
|
|
|
11/24/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options vest annually in equal installments over a three-year period.
One-third of stock options vested on December 5, 2007. The remaining two-thirds will
vest in equal installments on December 5, 2008 and December 5, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Stock options vest annually in equal installments over a three year period.
The remaining unexercisable options will vest in equal installments on June 12, 2008
and June 12, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Stock options vest annually in equal installments over a three year period.
The remaining unexercisable options will vest(ed) in equal installments on December 1,
2007 and December 1, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Stock options vest annually in equal installments over a three year period.
The final third of stock options vested on December 1, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
Stock options vest annually in equal installments over a three year period.
The final third of stock options vested on February 1, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
This column shows the total market value of the unvested stock awards as of
October 31, 2007, based on the closing price per share of the Companys stock of $41.19
on October 31, 2007. |
|
(7) |
|
Restricted stock vests in full one year from the date of grant. These shares
vested on December 5, 2007. |
-22-
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Restricted stock vests in full two years from the date of grant. These shares
vested on December 1, 2007. |
|
(9) |
|
Restricted stock vests in full three years from the date of grant. These shares
vested on December 1, 2007. |
|
(10) |
|
Restricted stock vests in full three years from the date of grant. These shares
will vest on December 5, 2009. |
|
(11) |
|
Restricted stock vests in full three years from the date of grant. These shares
will vest on June 12, 2009. |
|
(12) |
|
Restricted stock vests in full three years from the date of grant. These shares
will vest on December 1, 2008. |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2007
The following table provides information regarding the value realized by the named executive
officers upon the vesting of restricted stock awards during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007.
None of the named executive officers exercised stock options during fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired on |
|
|
Value Realized |
|
|
|
Vesting |
|
|
on Vesting |
|
Name |
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
523,872 |
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
114,597 |
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
Quanex Corporation maintains three defined benefit plans for its non-union employees. One is
the Quanex Corporation Employees Pension Plan (Qualified Plan), which provides funded, tax
qualified benefits up to the limits on compensation and benefits under the Internal Revenue Code.
The other two plans are the Quanex Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (SERP) and the Quanex
Corporation Supplemental Salaried Employees Pension Plan (Mirror Plan). These plans provide
unfunded, non-qualified benefits that are offset by amounts including benefits under the Qualified
Plan, and a Social Security offset is employed under the Quanex Corporation Supplemental Retirement
Plan. Named executives are mutually exclusive to the two non-qualified plans.
-23-
The following table discloses the years of credited service of, present single-sum value of the
accrued benefits for, and payments during fiscal year 2007 for the named executive officers under
the SERP, Qualified Plan, and Mirror Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Present Value |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
Years Credited |
|
|
of Accumulated |
|
|
During Last |
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
SERP (1) |
|
|
6.687 |
|
|
|
3,653,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Qualified Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
SERP (1) |
|
|
1.386 |
|
|
|
103,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Qualified Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
SERP (1) |
|
|
4.333 |
|
|
|
154,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Qualified Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
Mirror Plan (3) |
|
|
15.972 |
|
|
|
253,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Qualified Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
Mirror Plan (3) |
|
|
3.936 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
Qualified Plan (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Quanex Corporation Supplemental Retirement Plan (SERP) provides retirement
benefits for certain designated management employees in addition to those provided
under the Qualified Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to supplement those retirement
benefits that a Participant may be entitled to receive as a salaried employee of Quanex
Corporation. The SERP pays a retirement benefit to eligible employees following
retirement or termination of employment. The benefit formula under the SERP equals:
2.75 percent of Final Average Earnings (defined as the highest 36 months of
compensation during the last 60 months preceding retirement or termination) multiplied
by Years of Service (not in excess of 20 years), less the sum of (1) the Participants
Qualified Plan Benefit, and (2) one-half of the Participants Social Security Benefit
multiplied by a fraction (which shall not exceed one) the numerator of which is the
Participants number of years of Service and the denominator of which is 20.
Definition of compensation under this Plan includes W-2 wages modified by excluding
reimbursements or other expense allowances, fringe benefits (cash and noncash), moving
expenses, deferred compensation, welfare benefits, BeneFlex dollars under the Quanex
Corporation Medical Reimbursement Plan, and restricted stock awards and stock options;
and modified further by including elective contributions under a cafeteria plan
maintained by the Company that is governed by section 125 of the Code and elective
contributions to any plan maintained by the Company that contains a qualified cash or
deferred arrangement under section 401(k) of the Code. |
|
|
|
Vesting in the SERP is based on 5 Years of Service. Early Retirement under the SERP
requires a Participant to attain age 55 with 5 Years of Service. However, Mr. Jean is
eligible for an immediate late retirement benefit. If the Participant retires prior to
age 55, the accrued benefit is reduced 5% for each year (and fractional year) that the
Participants benefit commencement precedes age 65. |
|
|
|
Benefits under the Plan are paid under the following options: |
|
|
|
Single Life Annuity |
|
|
|
|
50%, 75%, or 100% Joint & Survivor Annuity |
|
|
|
|
10 Year Certain and Life |
|
|
|
|
Single Lump Sum |
-24-
|
|
|
|
|
The Plan also pays a death benefit to the designated beneficiary if the Participant has
retired or terminated employment, but has not commenced payment. In addition, the SERP
pays a Disability Benefit. Should a Participant terminate due to disability prior to
age 55, after a six-month waiting period, the SERP will pay a Disability Benefit until
age 65 equal to 50 percent of the sum of his monthly Earnings in effect at the date of his Disability and the monthly equivalent of
the average of his Incentive Awards for the prior three Plan Years, less the sum of (1)
the Participants Qualified Plan Benefit; (2) the Participants Social Security Benefit;
(3) the Participants benefit under the Companys group long-term disability insurance
plan; (4) the Participants benefit under an individual disability policy provided by
the Company, and; (5)the Participants benefit under the Companys wage continuation
policy plan. Benefits payable from the Plan are equal to the actuarial equivalent of
the accrued benefit at date of distribution employing the Actuarial Equivalent
definition from the Qualified Plan. The company has no policy for granting additional
service under this plan. |
|
(2) |
|
The Quanex Corporation Employees Pension Plan (Qualified Plan) was established
to provide retirement income to the Corporations non-union employees. It is an ERISA
qualified pension plan. The Plan provides retirement income to eligible Participants.
The Qualified Plan pays a retirement benefit equal to 1-1/2% of the Traditional
Members Average Monthly Compensation (high 5 consecutive years of Earnings out of the
10 years preceding termination or retirement) times years and fractional years of
Benefit Service earned prior to November 1, 1985 plus the sum of 1% of Average Monthly
Compensation up to Social Security Covered Compensation and 1-1/2% of the Traditional
Members Average Monthly Compensation in excess of Social Security Covered
Compensation, the total of which is multiplied by years and fractional years of Benefit
Service from on and after November 1, 1985. Compensation is defined as earned income
excluding deferred compensation. Compensation is limited by the compensation limits
imposed under the Internal Revenue Code. For Cash Balance Participants, the Qualified
Plan pays the Account Balance with interest at date of termination. The contribution
equals a certain percentage based on location, credited with interest. This Qualified
Plan pays a Death Benefit prior to retirement to the spouse, or to the estate, if no
spouse. The qualified Plan does not provide for a Disability Retirement. The
Qualified Plan requires 5 Years of Vesting Service for Traditional Plan Participants
and 3 Years of Service for Cash Balance Participants. Early Retirement under the Plan
requires a Participant to have attained age 55 with 5 Years of Service. None of the
Named Executive Officers (NEOs) is currently eligible for an early retirement benefit
under this plan. However, Mr. Jean is eligible for an immediate late retirement
benefit. Benefits commencing prior to age 65 are reduced 5/9ths of 1% for each of the
first 60 months, and an additional 5/18ths of 1% for each month in excess of 60 that
benefits commence prior to age 65. The company has no policy for granting additional
service under this plan. |
|
(3) |
|
The Quanex Corporation Supplemental Salaried Employees Pension Plan (the
Mirror Plan) was established to provide a retirement pay supplement for a select group
of management or highly compensated employees so as to retain their loyalty and to
offer a further incentive to them to maintain and increase their standard of
performance. The Mirror Plan pays a retirement benefit in the form of a lump sum to
eligible employees following retirement or termination of employment. If a Participant
terminates employment, an Actuarial Equivalent lump sum of the Participants Qualified
Plan Benefit that would be payable if the applicable limitation under section
401(a)(17) of the Code for each fiscal year of the Qualified Plan commencing on or
after November 1, 1994, was not limited (indexed for increases in the cost of living),
less the Participants Qualified Plan Benefit. Early Retirement under the Plan
requires a Participant to have attained age 55 with 5 Years of Service. None of the
NEOs is currently eligible for an early retirement benefit under this plan. The Mirror
Plan requires 5 Years of Service for vesting purposes for Traditional Plan
Participants, and three years of Service requirement for Cash Balance Participants. In
addition, the Plan also pays a death benefit to the designated beneficiary if the
Participant has retired or terminated employment, but has not commenced payment. The
Mirror Plan does not provide a Disability Benefit. The company has no policy for
granting additional service under this plan. |
-25-
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table discloses contributions, earnings and balances to the named executive
officers under the Quanex Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the DC Plan) for the fiscal
year ending October 31, 2007.
Nonqualifed Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Contributions |
|
|
Contributions |
|
|
Earnings in |
|
|
Withdrawals/ |
|
|
Balance at Last |
|
|
|
in Last FY (1) |
|
|
in Last FY (1) |
|
|
Last FY (2) |
|
|
Distributions |
|
|
FYE (3) |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
1,716,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332,729 |
|
|
|
(1,753,926 |
) |
|
|
1,507,482 |
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
84,890 |
|
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
9,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,403 |
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
159,168 |
|
|
|
31,834 |
|
|
|
91,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,740 |
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
56,970 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
24,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,915 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Executive contributions are incentive compensation earned for fiscal 2006
performance and deferred in December 2006, when they would have otherwise been paid,
during fiscal 2007. The registrant contributions are the associated Company match for
these executive contributions. The full amount shown in the executive contributions
and registrant contributions columns for each executive was reported in the Summary
Compensation Table included in the Companys 2007 Proxy Statement, with the exception
of Mr. Korb, who was not included as an NEO in the previous year. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate earnings are not included as compensation in the current Summary
Compensation Table, and were not included in the Companys 2007 Proxy Statement. |
|
(3) |
|
The aggregate balance is as of 10/31/07, and includes current and previous
years executive and registrant contributions and the earnings on those contributions,
less any withdrawals. In previous years, the Company has disclosed annually the
executive contributions in the Proxy Statement, for the associated year. None of this
balance is included as compensation in the current Summary Compensation Table. |
Under the DC Plan, executive officers and other senior managers are permitted to defer all or
any part of their Incentive Award, LTIP Compensation or Omnibus Compensation under the DC Plan.
These deferrals are placed into notional accounts maintained under the DC Plan and are deemed
invested in cash, units denominated in Common Stock, or any of the accounts available under the
Companys qualified 401(k) plan, as the executive officer elects. If an executive officer elects
to make a deferral to his or her notional common stock unit account for a period of three full
years or more, a matching award equal to 20% of the amount deferred is made by the Company to the
executive officers notional account. The number of units that is deemed invested in Company
common stock units and credited to an executive officers notional account is equal to the number
of full shares of Common Stock that could have been purchased with the dollar amount deferred or
matched based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date
the amount would have been paid had it not been deferred. If a dividend or other distribution is
declared and paid on Common Stock, for each notional common stock unit credited to an executive
officers account a corresponding credit will be accrued in the executive officers notional
matching account. Except with respect to matching deferrals
(and dividend deferrals, if any), all executive officer deferrals are 100% vested. Matching
deferrals (and dividend deferrals, if any) are 100% vested, unless an executive officer receives a
distribution from the DC Plan for any reason, other than death, disability or retirement, within
three years after a deferral was credited to his or her notional common stock unit account.
-26-
If an
executive officer receives such a distribution from the DC Plan, any matching amount corresponding
to the deferral that has been credited for less than three years, plus any dividends or other
distributions that correspond to such matching amount, will be forfeited. No payments may be made
under the DC Plan until a distribution is permitted in accordance with the terms of the DC Plan.
In the event of a change of control of the Company, any amount credited to an executive
officers account is fully vested and is payable in cash within five days after the change of
control occurs. A change in control is defined generally as (i) an acquisition of securities
resulting in an individual or entity or group thereof becoming, directly or indirectly, the
beneficial owner of 20% or more of either (a) the Companys then-outstanding Common Stock or
(b) the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors, (ii) a change in a majority of the persons who were
members of the Board of Directors as of October 1, 2006 (the Incumbent Board), (iii) generally,
a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale of the Company or disposition of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Company, or (iv) the approval by the stockholders of the
Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. For this purpose, an individual
will be treated as a member of the Incumbent Board if he becomes a director subsequent to
October 1, 2006, and his election, or nomination for election by the Companys stockholders, was
approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board;
unless his initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election
contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened
solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of an individual, entity or group other than
the Board. All distributions under the DC Plan will be made in cash. Any deferral or payment
permitted under the DC Plan will be administered in a manner that is intended to comply with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Non-Change in Control Termination
Employment Agreements and Employee Severance Policy
The Company has entered into employment agreements with the Chief Executive Officer, Raymond
A. Jean and the Chief Financial Officer, Thomas M. Walker that contain certain termination
provisions. Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a further description of the
other terms in the agreements. Severance benefits are provided per the agreements in the event of
termination of employment by the Board of Directors in the case of Mr. Jean or by the Company in
the case of Mr. Walker for any reason other than for Cause as defined under the section Change
in Control Termination. The severance benefits that apply when there is a qualifying termination
of the executives employment include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance
|
|
Two times base salary paid out semi-monthly
|
|
One times base salary paid out semi-monthly |
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Award
|
|
Pro-rated through date of termination at target
|
|
Pro-rated through date of termination at target |
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Welfare
|
|
Extension of benefits for 18 months
|
|
None under employment agreement. Extension of benefits for 6 months under Company policy. |
-27-
The other Named Executive Officers (NEOs), Kevin P. Delaney, Mark M. Marcucci and Brent L.
Korb, would be covered under the Companys Severance Policy which provides benefits if termination
results from Company initiated action due to a reduction-in-force, individual job eliminations, or
an employees jobs skills have become obsolete and he or she cannot be placed in another job.
Under the policy, each of these NEOs are eligible for 6 months of base salary paid in accordance
with the normal payroll cycle and 6 months extension of health and welfare benefits.
Other Severance Arrangements
The Supplemental Benefit Plan (i.e., SERP) provides for benefits if the executive becomes
disabled before fully vested. Since Mr. Jean is fully vested in the SERP, he would not receive any
additional benefits. In the case of Mr. Walker or Mr. Delaney, should either Participant terminate
due to Disability prior to age 55, after a six-month waiting period, the SERP will pay a Disability
Benefit until age 65 equal to 50 percent of the sum of his monthly Earnings in effect at the date
of his Disability and the monthly equivalent of the average of his Incentive Awards for the prior
three Plan Years, less the sum of (1) the Participants Qualified Benefit Plan; (2) the
Participants Social Security Benefit; (3) the Participants benefit under the Companys group
long-term disability insurance plan; (4) the Participants benefit under an individual disability
policy provided by the Company, and; (5) the Participants benefit under the Companys wage
continuation policy plan.
All
five NEOs are entitled to the additional following benefits in the event of Death and
Disability. All five NEOs would also be entitled to these same
benefits (with the exception of restricted stock granted under the
2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan) in the event of Retirement, provided the
NEO is eligible for retirement. As of October 31, 2007, Mr. Jean is the only NEO that is currently eligible for either
early or regular retirement.
|
|
|
Under the Quanex Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Option and Restricted
Stock Plan all unvested options shall continue to vest and be exercisable for up to
three years. |
|
|
|
|
Under the Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan all unvested
options continue to vest for up to three years and be exercisable until the date of
expiration. |
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
Under the Quanex Corporation 1996 Employee Stock Option and Restricted
Stock Plan all unvested shares shall vest on a prorated basis to the anniversary of
the grant date that coincides with or immediately follows the date on which
separation from service actually occurs. |
|
|
|
|
Under the Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, on the
occurrence of Death or Disability only, all unvested shares shall vest on a
prorated basis determined by dividing the number of days during the period
commencing on the grant date and ending on the date of Death or Disability by
1,095. |
|
|
|
Performance units under the Quanex Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan and under the
Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan all unvested performance units shall vest on
a prorated basis for the amount of time that has elapsed in the performance period through
the date of termination, and the Company shall pay to the executive a lump sum cash payment
in exchange for the Performance Units. |
-28-
For the purposes of these aforementioned agreements, all stock options and restricted stock
granted prior to December 31, 2005 were granted under the Quanex Corporation 1996 Employee Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Plan and all stock options and restricted stock granted after December
31, 2005 were granted under the Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Also, all
Performance Units granted before December 31, 2005 were granted under the Quanex Corporation
Long-Term Incentive Plan and all Performance Units granted after December 31, 2005 were granted
under the Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
Deferred compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan all amounts accrued and
credited as a company match, including dividends and other property or rights, are
immediately vested upon separation from service. All amounts in the participants account
will be paid in cash in the form of a lump sum or as installments. |
Change in Control Termination
Change in Control Severance Agreements
The Company has entered into change-in-control severance agreements with all five Named
Executive Officers. If there is a change in control of the Company, as defined below, and the
executive has a qualifying termination of employment within the three years following the change in
control, the severance benefits in these agreements include:
|
|
|
Three times the sum of the base salary for the fiscal year in effect
plus an amount equal to the greater of the target incentive award for the fiscal
year in which termination occurs or the performance award for the fiscal year
preceding the fiscal year in which the termination occurs for Messrs. Jean, Walker
and Delaney paid as a lump sum. |
|
|
|
|
Two times the sum of the base salary for the fiscal year in effect plus
an amount equal to the greater of the target incentive award for the fiscal year in
which termination occurs or the performance award for the fiscal year preceding the
fiscal year in which the termination occurs for Messrs. Marcucci and Korb paid as a
lump sum. |
|
|
|
Pro-rated incentive award for the number of days worked in the fiscal year in which
termination occurs, equal to the greater of the target incentive award for the fiscal year
in which termination occurs or the performance award for the fiscal year preceding the
fiscal year in which the termination occurs paid as a lump sum. |
|
|
|
|
Health and welfare benefits continuation for three years paid by the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Time vested equity |
|
|
|
All unvested stock options shall become fully exercisable, regardless
of whether or not the vesting conditions set forth in the relevant stock option
agreements have been satisfied in full. |
-29-
|
|
|
All restrictions on any restricted stock shall be removed and the stock
shall be freely transferable regardless of whether the conditions set forth in the
relevant restricted stock agreements have been satisfied in full. |
|
|
|
Gross-up for any applicable excise tax. |
If a named executive officer is entitled to benefits under a change in control agreement, the
following would occur immediately upon the occurrence of a change in control (regardless of whether
the named executive officers employment is terminated as a result of the change in control):
|
|
|
All options to acquire common stock and all stock appreciation rights pertaining to
common stock held by the executive immediately prior to a change in control would become
fully exercisable; and |
|
|
|
|
All restrictions on any restricted common stock granted to the executive prior to the
change in control would be removed and the stock would be freely transferable. |
Change in Control Severance Benefits Under Other Plans and Agreements
The Supplemental Benefit Plan (i.e., SERP) provides for benefits in the event of involuntary
termination without cause following a Change in Control. Since Mr. Jean is fully vested in the
SERP, he would not receive any additional benefits. In the case of Mr. Walker or Mr. Delaney, the
executive will vest in the SERP benefit and the SERP is paid out in a lump sum at the time of a
Change in Control.
All five NEOs are entitled to the additional following benefits in the event of involuntary
termination without cause following a Change in Control:
|
|
|
Under the Long-Term Incentive Plan the Executive will receive an amount equal to
the product of (1) the number of Performance Units awarded to the Grantee, (2)
$100.00, and (3) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during
the Performance Period that will have elapsed prior to the first day of the second
Fiscal Year immediately following the Fiscal Year in which the Change in Control
occurs and the denominator of which is 1,095. |
|
|
|
|
Under the 2006 Omnibus Plan the Executive will receive an amount in cash equal
to the product of (1) the Target Value ($100.00), (2) the number of Performance
Units awarded in the year in which the termination occurs, and (3) a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of years through the date of termination in the
current Performance Period (rounded up to the nearest full year) and the
denominator of which is the number of years in the current Performance Period. |
-30-
|
|
|
Deferred compensation all stock fund units credited to a current or former
participants account will be fully vested and converted to cash based on the Change of
Control Value of such stock fund units and be paid out as a lump sum or in installments. |
For the purposes of the aforementioned Change in Control related agreements, a Change in
Control shall be defined as an occurrence of any of the following:
|
|
|
The acquisition by any individual, entity, or group other than the Company of beneficial
ownership of 20 percent or more of then outstanding shares of common stock; or |
|
|
|
|
Individuals who constitute the Board of Directors cease for any reason to constitute at
least a majority of the Board of Directors; or |
|
|
|
|
The consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale of the Company, or
a disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company. |
An Event of Termination for Cause shall have occurred if, after a Change in Control, the
Executive shall have committed in connection with his duties or in course of employment with the
Company, gross negligence or willful misconduct, an act of fraud, embezzlement, theft, intentional
wrongful damage, intentional wrongful disclosure, or an act leading to a conviction of a felony or
misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.
An Event of Termination for Good Reason shall have occurred if, on or after a Change in
Control the Company or successor assigns the Executive any duties inconsistent with Executives
position or duties prior to the Change in Control, the Company or successor reduces the Executives
annual base salary or incentive award, the Company or successor relocates the Executives principal
office outside of the metropolitan area of Houston, the Company or successor fails to continue any
policies, plans, programs or arrangements the Executive participated in prior to the Change in
Control, the Company or successor reduces the Executives number of paid vacation days, the Company
or successor fails to provide appropriate office space, the Company or successor fails to honor any
provision of any employment agreement, or the Company or successor purports to terminate the
Executives employment by the Company without proper notice.
-31-
Post-Employment Benefit Table
The following table quantifies the potential payments to named executive officers under the
contracts and plans discussed above for various termination scenarios. In each case, the
termination is assumed to take place on 10/31/07. The tables show only the value of the amounts
payable for enhanced compensation and benefits in connection with each termination scenario.
Post- Employment Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NQ Deferred |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Pro-rated |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Health |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
(SERP and |
|
|
Tax Gross- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Payment |
|
|
Bonus |
|
|
(Unvested) |
|
|
(Unvested)(1) |
|
|
(Accelerated) |
|
|
Benefits(2) |
|
|
(Unvested) |
|
|
DB)(3) |
|
|
Up |
|
|
Benefit |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Retirement(4) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
767,692 |
|
|
|
1,362,359 |
|
|
|
506,384 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,636,435 |
|
Death/Disability |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
767,692 |
|
|
|
2,014,064 |
|
|
|
506,384 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3,288,140 |
|
Involuntary w/o Cause |
|
|
1,480,000 |
|
|
|
661,683 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
14,419 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,156,102 |
|
Termination after Change in Control |
|
|
6,096,609 |
|
|
|
1,292,203 |
|
|
|
767,692 |
|
|
|
2,083,184 |
|
|
|
710,000 |
|
|
|
199,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,148,928 |
|
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Death/Disability |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
145,600 |
|
|
|
122,893 |
|
|
|
54,247 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
9,574 |
|
|
|
263,277 |
(6) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
595,591 |
|
Involuntary w/o Cause |
|
|
335,000 |
|
|
|
225,216 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
6,677 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
566,893 |
|
Termination after Change in Control |
|
|
1,758,750 |
|
|
|
251,250 |
|
|
|
145,600 |
|
|
|
341,877 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
75,137 |
|
|
|
9,574 |
|
|
|
169,404 |
|
|
|
833,570 |
|
|
|
3,645,162 |
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Death/Disability |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
151,050 |
|
|
|
290,164 |
|
|
|
103,370 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
89,344 |
|
|
|
1,169,802 |
(6) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
1,803,730 |
|
Involuntary w/o Cause |
|
|
122,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
5,618 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
128,118 |
|
Termination after Change in Control |
|
|
1,690,005 |
|
|
|
318,335 |
|
|
|
151,050 |
|
|
|
426,317 |
|
|
|
146,667 |
|
|
|
91,096 |
|
|
|
89,344 |
|
|
|
672,114 |
|
|
|
1,177,415 |
|
|
|
4,762,343 |
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Death/Disability |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
202,883 |
|
|
|
409,220 |
|
|
|
112,767 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
724,870 |
|
Involuntary w/o Cause |
|
|
137,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
7,436 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
144,936 |
|
Termination after Change in Control |
|
|
979,268 |
|
|
|
214,634 |
|
|
|
202,883 |
|
|
|
556,065 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
72,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,184,925 |
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Death/Disability |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
43,925 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
28,192 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
25,684 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
159,755 |
|
Involuntary w/o Cause |
|
|
86,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
4,254 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
90,754 |
|
Termination after Change in Control |
|
|
573,880 |
|
|
|
113,940 |
|
|
|
43,925 |
|
|
|
160,641 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
27,076 |
|
|
|
25,684 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
307,933 |
|
|
|
1,293,079 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unvested restricted shares granted after December 31, 2005 under the Quanex
Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan are forfeited except upon Death, Disability or
termination after a Change in Control. |
|
(2) |
|
Health Benefits paid upon involuntary termination without cause include
company paid COBRA premiums. Health Benefits paid upon termination after Change in
Control includes continuation of all welfare benefits. |
|
(3) |
|
See Narrative to Pension Benefits Table for further description of
Supplemental Benefit Plan and Defined Benefit Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
This row is intended to show any additional benefits and does not include the
present value of the regular pension benefits that would also be payable. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Walker, Mr. Delaney, Mr. Marcucci, and Mr. Korb have not reached the
minimum retirement requirement of 55 years of age and five years of service with the
Company as of October 31, 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
Retirement Benefit amounts for Mr. Walker and Mr. Delaney under Quanex
Corporation Supplemental Benefit Plan are in the event of Disability only. |
-32-
Director Compensation
Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for
serving on our Board. Mr. Jean is the only director who is also an employee of the Company, and as
such he does not receive any additional compensation for such service.
In fiscal 2007, our non-employee directors received the following compensation:
|
|
|
Annual Cash Retainer (1) $40,000/year paid quarterly |
|
|
|
|
Board Meeting Fees(1) $1,500/meeting ($1,250/telephonic meeting) |
|
|
|
|
Committee Meeting Fees(1) $1,250/meeting |
|
|
|
|
Committee Chairman Fees(1) $7,500/year for Audit; $6,000/year
for Compensation; $6,000/year for Governance. Executive Committee Chair
receives no extra pay. |
|
|
|
|
Annual Stock Retainer(2) Equivalent value of $25,000 in
restricted stock units and equivalent value of $50,000 in options to
purchase shares of the Companys common stock. Both the restricted stock
units and the stock options vest immediately upon issuance on October 31,
however the restricted stock units are restricted until the director ceases
to serve in such role. |
|
|
|
|
Initial Stock Option Grant (2) Following the first full year
of service as a director, each non-employee director receives an initial
stock option grant to purchase 5,000 shares of the Companys common stock.
These options vest immediately. |
|
|
|
|
Expense Reimbursement Directors are reimbursed for their expenses relating
to attendance at meetings. |
|
(1) |
|
Non-employee directors are permitted to defer all or any part of their cash
retainers and fees under the Quanex Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the DC
Plan). For a complete description of the primary plan features please see the
narrative following the Executive Compensation Table titled Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Restricted stock unit grants and stock option grants were issued from the
Quanex Corporation 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan. |
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
We encourage our directors to own stock in the Company because we believe it provides strong
alignment of interests between directors and shareholders. Our Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
provide that non-employee directors are expected to own, beneficially or otherwise, common
shares or common share equivalents of the Companys Common Stock valued at no less than $100,000,
which may be accumulated over a period of three years from joining the Board.. Each year the
Committee is apprised of compliance by directors. Currently, all directors subject to the
guidelines are in compliance.
-33-
Director Compensation Table
The table below shows the compensation of non-employee directors in fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash (1) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
Earnings (3) |
|
|
Compensation (4) |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Donald G. Barger, Jr. |
|
|
72,375 |
|
|
|
31,149 |
|
|
|
33,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,230 |
|
|
|
153,679 |
|
Susan F. Davis |
|
|
59,250 |
|
|
|
31,149 |
|
|
|
33,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,850 |
|
|
|
136,174 |
|
Russell M. Flaum (5) |
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
15,952 |
|
Joseph J. Ross |
|
|
68,500 |
|
|
|
31,149 |
|
|
|
33,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,700 |
|
|
|
147,274 |
|
Joseph D. Rupp |
|
|
39,750 |
|
|
|
25,002 |
|
|
|
33,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,677 |
|
Vincent R. Scorsone (6) |
|
|
24,250 |
|
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,584 |
|
Richard L. Wellek |
|
|
61,250 |
|
|
|
31,149 |
|
|
|
33,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,250 |
|
|
|
138,574 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts shown reflect fees earned by the directors during fiscal year 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
These columns show respectively, the dollar amounts for restricted stock
units and stock options recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with
respect to fiscal year 2007 in accordance with FAS 123(R). Director grants vest
immediately and as such are expensed on the date of grant. A discussion of the
assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 15 to our audited
financial statements on form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007. These amounts
reflect the Companys accounting expense for these awards and do not necessarily
correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by directors. The following
table shows the aggregate number of restricted stock units and stock option awards
outstanding for each director as of October 31, 2007 as well as the grant date fair
value of restricted stock units and option grants made during fiscal year 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
Aggregate Stock Units |
|
|
Aggregate Option |
|
|
of Stock and Option |
|
|
|
Outstanding as of |
|
|
Awards Outstanding as |
|
|
Awards Made During |
|
|
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
|
of October 31, 2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Name |
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
Donald G. Barger, Jr. |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
31,458 |
|
|
|
58,927 |
|
Susan F. Davis |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
22,458 |
|
|
|
58,927 |
|
Russell M. Flaum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph J. Ross |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
40,458 |
|
|
|
58,927 |
|
Joseph D. Rupp |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
58,927 |
|
Vincent R. Scorsone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Wellek |
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
31,458 |
|
|
|
58,927 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
We do not provide a pension plan for non-employee directors. None of the
directors received preferential or above-market earnings on deferred compensation. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts shown are the dollar value of Company matching awards made in the
form of notional common stock units, pursuant to the terms of the DC Plan. Mr.
Bargers total also includes $1,755 for company paid premiums on his life insurance
policy. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Flaum retired as a director on December 13, 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Scorsone retired as a director on February 27, 2007. |
-34-
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
For information related to securities authorized for issuance under the Companys equity
compensation plans, please see the table titled Equity Compensation Summary, located in the
Original 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
Principal Stockholders
The following table contains information regarding the beneficial ownership of each person or
entity who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Companys
outstanding Common Stock. This information is current as of December 31, 2007 for each Holder.
Such
information is based upon information provided to the Company by such owners or their required SEC
filings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial |
|
|
Percent |
|
Name and Address |
|
Ownership |
|
|
(%) |
|
Lord Abbett & Co. LLC, 90 Hudson Street, Jersey City, NJ 07302 |
|
|
6,543,547 |
(1) |
|
|
17.56 |
|
Artisan Partners Limited, 875 East Wisconsin Avenue, Ste. 800, Milwaukee, WI 53202 |
|
|
2,453,508 |
(2) |
|
|
6.58 |
|
Barclays Global Investors, 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 |
|
|
1,974,367 |
(3) |
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC possesses sole investment discretion with respect to all shares and
sole voting authority on 6,170,367 shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Artisan Partners Limited possesses shared voting power with respect to 2,193,008 shares and
shared investment discretion with respect to all shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Barclays Global Investors, a subsidiary of Barclays PLC, a United Kingdom financial services
company, possesses sole investment discretion with respect to all shares and sole voting
authority with respect to 1,489,481 shares. |
-35-
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth, as of February 1, 2008, the number and percentage of
beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock, Restricted Stock Units, shares of Common Stock
credited under the Deferred Compensation Plan, and the amount of shares obtainable upon conversion
of options exercisable (or exercisable within 60 days) for each current director and nominee for
director of the Company, the executive officers named in the compensation table on page 19 of this
Form 10-K/A, and all officers and directors as a group. Each of the directors and executive
officers has sole voting and investment with respect to the securities listed by their name below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Credited |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned of |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Under |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record |
|
|
Units |
|
|
DC Plan |
|
|
Options(1) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Percent |
|
Raymond A. Jean |
|
|
188,890 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
36,172 |
|
|
|
357,641 |
|
|
|
582,703 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
Thomas M. Walker |
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
24,419 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Kevin P. Delaney |
|
|
18,014 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13,334 |
|
|
|
52,358 |
|
|
|
83,706 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark A. Marcucci |
|
|
23,260 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
94,467 |
|
|
|
117,727 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Brent L. Korb |
|
|
5,625 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4,171 |
|
|
|
16,066 |
|
|
|
25,862 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald G. Barger |
|
|
4,107 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
15,724 |
|
|
|
31,458 |
|
|
|
52,642 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Susan F. Davis |
|
|
25,182 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
19,823 |
|
|
|
22,458 |
|
|
|
68,816 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph J. Ross |
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
14,668 |
|
|
|
40,458 |
|
|
|
62,752 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph D. Rupp |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
8,135 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Richard L. Wellek |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
8,005 |
|
|
|
31,458 |
|
|
|
43,714 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All Officers and Directors as a group (2) |
|
|
289,011 |
|
|
|
6,019 |
|
|
|
121,732 |
|
|
|
712,092 |
|
|
|
1,128,854 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1.0% |
|
(1) |
|
Includes options exercisable within 60 days. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes owned or credited shares totaling 29,551 for Mr. Hammonds and 28,827 for Mr.
Mannion. |
Changes in Control
As disclosed in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2007, the Company on
November 18, 2007 entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Gerdau
S.A. (Gerdau), pursuant to which a U.S. wholly-owned subsidiary of Gerdau will merge with and
into the Company, with the Company being the surviving corporation (the Merger).
Following the Merger, the Company will be wholly owned by Gerdau. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the Merger Agreement, upon completion of the Merger, each share of the Companys
common stock issued and outstanding will be converted into the right to receive cash consideration
of $39.20, without interest. The Merger will constitute a change in control of the Company.
-36-
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Related Party Transactions
During the Companys fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, there were no related party
transactions as defined by Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.
The Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics generally prohibits directors and officers
from engaging in activities that would involve a conflict of interest or any appearance thereof.
In the event that an employee or director needs a waiver of the Code of Business Conducts and
Ethics, that employee must request such a waiver from the Companys Nominating and Governance
Committee, which then must consider the request and make any necessary disclosure that may be
required by the New York Stock Exchange or the SEC. Additionally, the Company requests disclosure
of any conflicts of interest in its annual employee questionnaire and annual Director and Officer
Questionnaire, both of which are completed by all directors and executive officers of the Company
every year.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Audit and Related Fees
The following table reflects fees for professional audit services rendered by Deloitte &
Touche LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended October 31, 2007
and October 31, 2006, and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP during
these periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
Audit Fees(1) |
|
$ |
2,014,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,969,000 |
|
Audit Related Fees(2) |
|
|
973,000 |
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
Tax Fees(3) |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
All Other Fees(4) |
|
|
485,000 |
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,538,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,226,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Fees consist of professional services and related expenses rendered by Deloitte &
Touche LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements, audit of internal controls and
review of financial statements included in Forms 10-Q and Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit Related Fees include employee benefit audits as well as assurance and related
services by Deloitte & Touche LLP that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of our financial statements and are not included in Audit Fees. Included
in fiscal 2007 is $861 thousand of additional testing and audit work performed in
preparation for possible lower scoping as a result of the pending transactions. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax Fees include professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for tax return
reviews and miscellaneous consulting. |
|
(4) |
|
All Other Fees include all other services provided by Deloitte & Touche, LLP, other
than those reported above, including purchase price accounting services and other
miscellaneous consulting. The fiscal 2007 fees are entirely comprised of transaction due
diligence. |
-37-
Procedures for Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for
reviewing and approving, in advance, any audit and any permissible non-audit engagement between the
Company and its independent auditors. Deloitte & Touches engagement to conduct the audit of
Quanex Corporation for fiscal 2007 was approved by the Audit Committee on December 5, 2006.
Additionally, 100% of the permissible audit and non-audit engagements or relationships between the
Company and Deloitte & Touche LLP entered into during fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 were reviewed and
approved by the Audit Committee, as provided in its charter.
We have been advised by Deloitte & Touche LLP that substantially all of the work done in
conjunction with its 2007 audit of the Companys financial statements for the most recently
completed fiscal year was performed by full-time employees and partners of Deloitte & Touche, LLP.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provisions of services rendered for all other fees, as
described above, is compatible with maintaining independence of Deloitte & Touche, LLP.
-38-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quanex Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ RAYMOND A. JEAN
Raymond A. Jean
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Raymond A. Jean
Raymond A. Jean
|
|
Chairman of the Board,
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Donald G. Barger, Jr.
Donald G. Barger, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Susan F. Davis
Susan F. Davis
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph J. Ross
Joseph J. Ross
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph D. Rupp
Joseph D. Rupp
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard L. Wellek
Richard L. Wellek
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas M. Walker
Thomas M. Walker
|
|
Senior Vice PresidentFinance
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brent L. Korb
Brent L. Korb
|
|
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2008 |
-39-