OVERVIEW

Earnings Summary U.S. Bancorp and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) reported net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp of $1.4 billion for the second quarter of 2012, or $.71 per diluted common share, compared with $1.2 billion, or $.60 per diluted common share for the second quarter of 2011. Return on average assets and return on average common equity were 1.67 percent and 16.5 percent, respectively, for the second quarter of 2012, compared with 1.54 percent and 15.9 percent, respectively, for the second quarter of 2011. The provision for credit losses was $50 million lower than net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2012, compared with $175 million lower than net charge-offs for the second quarter of 2011.

Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis, for the second quarter of 2012 was $378 million (8.1 percent) higher than the second quarter of 2011, reflecting a 6.6 percent increase in net interest income and a 9.7 percent increase in noninterest income. The increase in net interest income over a year ago was largely the result of an increase in average earning assets and continued growth in lower cost core deposit funding. Noninterest income increased over a year ago, primarily due to higher mortgage banking revenue and merchant processing services revenue, partially offset by lower debit card revenue.

Noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2012 was $176 million (7.3 percent) higher than the second quarter of 2011, primarily due to higher compensation expense, employee benefits costs, mortgage servicing review-related professional services costs and other expense, including an accrual recorded by the Company in the second quarter of 2012 related to its portion of obligations associated with Visa Inc. litigation matters (“Visa accrual”).

The provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2012 of $470 million was $102 million (17.8 percent) lower than the second quarter of 2011. Net charge-offs in the second quarter of 2012 were $520 million, compared with $747 million in the second quarter of 2011. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

The Company reported net income attributable to U.S. Bancorp of $2.8 billion for the first six months of 2012, or $1.38 per diluted common share, compared with $2.2 billion, or $1.12 per diluted common share for the first six months of 2011. Return on average assets and return on average common equity were 1.64 percent and 16.3 percent, respectively, for the first six months of 2012, compared with 1.46 percent and 15.2 percent, respectively, for the first six months of 2011. Included in the Company’s results for the first six months of 2011 was a $46 million gain related to the acquisition of First Community Bank of New Mexico (“FCB”) in a transaction with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The provision for credit losses was $140 million lower than net charge-offs for the first six months of 2012, compared with $225 million lower than net charge-offs for the first six months of 2011.

Total net revenue, on a taxable-equivalent basis, for the first six months of 2012 was $788 million (8.6 percent) higher than the first six months of 2011, reflecting a 7.0 percent increase in net interest income and a 10.5 percent increase in noninterest income. The increase in net interest income over a year ago was largely the result of an increase in average earning assets and continued growth in lower cost core deposit funding. Noninterest income increased over a year ago, primarily due to higher mortgage banking revenue, merchant processing services revenue and commercial products revenue, partially offset by lower debit card revenue.

Noninterest expense in the first six months of 2012 was $422 million (8.9 percent) higher than the first six months of 2011, primarily due to higher compensation expense, employee benefits costs, mortgage servicing review-related professional services costs, marketing and business development costs and other expense, including higher regulatory and insurance-related costs and the second quarter 2012 Visa accrual.

The provision for credit losses for the first six months of 2012 of $951 million was $376 million (28.3 percent) lower than the first six months of 2011. Net charge-offs in the first six months of 2012 were $1.1 billion, compared with $1.6 billion in the first six months of 2011. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

STATEMENT OF INCOME ANALYSIS

Net Interest Income Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $2.7 billion in the second quarter of 2012, compared with $2.5 billion in the second quarter of 2011. Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $5.4 billion in the first six months of 2012, compared with $5.1 billion in the first six months of 2011. The increases were primarily the result of growth in both average earning assets and lower cost core deposit funding. Average earning assets increased $26.2 billion (9.4 percent) in the second quarter and $26.1 billion (9.5 percent) in the first six months of 2012, compared with the same periods of 2011, driven by increases in investment securities and loans. The net interest margin in the second quarter and first six months of 2012 was 3.58 percent and 3.59 percent, respectively, compared with 3.67 percent and 3.68 percent in the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively. The decreases in the net interest margin reflected increased lower-yielding investment securities and lower loan yields, partially offset by lower deposit rates, reductions in average cash balances held at the Federal Reserve, as well as the inclusion of credit card balance transfer fees in interest income beginning in the first quarter of 2012. Refer to the “Consolidated Daily Average Balance Sheet and Related Yields and Rates” tables for further information on net interest income.

Total average loans for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 were $15.3 billion (7.7 percent) and $13.9 billion (7.0 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2011, driven by growth in commercial loans, residential mortgages, credit card loans and commercial real estate loans. Impacting average credit card balances during 2012, was the purchase in late

December of 2011 of $700 million of consumer credit card loans. The increases were partially offset by declines in other retail loans and loans covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Average loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (“covered” loans) decreased $3.0 billion (17.7 percent) in both the second quarter and first six months of 2012, compared with the same periods of 2011, respectively.

Average investment securities in the second quarter and first six months of 2012 were $10.2 billion (16.2 percent) and $12.6 billion (21.2 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2011, primarily due to purchases of government agency mortgage-backed securities, as the Company increased its on-balance sheet liquidity in response to anticipated regulatory requirements.

Average total deposits for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 were $21.9 billion (10.5 percent) and $22.9 billion (11.1 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2011. Average noninterest-bearing deposits for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 were $15.8 billion (32.5 percent) and $17.6 billion (37.9 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2011, due to growth in average balances in a majority of the lines of business, including Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate, Wealth Management and Securities Services, and Consumer and Small Business Banking. Average total savings deposits for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 were $5.1 billion (4.4 percent) and $6.8 billion (6.0 percent) higher, respectively, than the same periods of 2011, primarily due to growth in Consumer and Small Business Banking balances, partially offset by lower broker-dealer deposits and government banking balances. Average time certificates of deposit less than

$100,000 were slightly lower in the second quarter and first six months of 2012, compared with the same periods of 2011. Average time deposits greater than $100,000 were $1.6 billion (5.3 percent) higher in the second quarter and $1.1 billion (3.4 percent) lower in the first six months of 2012, compared with the same periods of 2011, respectively. Time deposits greater than $100,000 are managed as an alternate to other funding sources such as wholesale borrowing, based largely on relative pricing.

Provision for Credit Losses The provision for credit losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 decreased $102 million (17.8 percent) and $376 million (28.3 percent), respectively, from the same periods of 2011. Net charge-offs decreased $227 million (30.4 percent) and $461 million (29.7 percent) in the second quarter and first six months of 2012, respectively, compared with the same periods of 2011, principally due to improvement in the commercial, commercial real estate, credit card and other retail portfolios. The provision for credit losses was lower than net charge-offs by $50 million in the second quarter and $140 million in the first six months of 2012, compared with $175 million in the second quarter and $225 million in the first six months of 2011. Refer to “Corporate Risk Profile” for further information on the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs, nonperforming assets and other factors considered by the Company in assessing the credit quality of the loan portfolio and establishing the allowance for credit losses.

Noninterest Income Noninterest income in the second quarter and first six months of 2012 was $2.4 billion and $4.6 billion, respectively, compared with $2.1 billion and $4.2 billion in the same periods of 2011. The $209 million (9.7 percent) increase during the second quarter and the $436 million (10.5 percent) increase during the first six months of 2012, compared

with the same periods of 2011, were primarily driven by strong mortgage banking revenue, principally due to higher origination and sales revenue. In addition, merchant processing services revenue increased, primarily due to higher transaction volumes. Commercial products revenue was also higher for the first six months of 2012, compared with the same period of 2011, the result of higher loan commitment and syndication fees and bond underwriting fees. Other income increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2012, compared with the same periods of 2011, primarily due to higher retail lease residual revenue and equity investment income. The increase in other income for the first six months of 2012 was partially offset by the FCB gain and a gain related to the Company’s investment in Visa Inc., both recorded in the first quarter of 2011. Also offsetting these positive variances were decreases in credit and debit card revenue due to lower debit card interchange fees as a result of fourth quarter of 2011 legislation (estimated impact of $81 million in the second quarter and $157 million in the first six months of 2012), net of mitigation efforts, and the impact of the inclusion of credit card balance transfer fees in interest income beginning in the first quarter of 2012. These negative variances were partially offset by higher transaction volumes and an $18 million credit related to expired debit card customer rewards recorded in the second quarter of 2012. ATM processing services revenue was also lower, due to excluding surcharge fees the Company passes through to others from revenue beginning in the first quarter of 2012, rather than reporting those amounts in occupancy expense as in previous periods. In addition, the second quarter and first six months of 2012 had unfavorable changes in net securities losses, compared with the same periods of the prior year, as the Company recognized impairment on certain perpetual preferred securities in the second quarter of 2012 as a result of recent downgrades of money center banks by a rating agency.

Noninterest Expense Noninterest expense was $2.6 billion in the second quarter and $5.2 billion in the first six months of 2012, compared with $2.4 billion and $4.7 billion in the same periods of 2011, or increases of $176 million (7.3 percent) and $422 million (8.9 percent), respectively. The increases in noninterest expense from a year ago were principally due to higher compensation expense, employee benefits expense, professional services expense and other expense. Compensation expense increased primarily as a result of growth in staffing for business initiatives and mortgage servicing-related activities, in addition to merit increases. Employee benefits expense increased principally due to higher pension costs and staffing levels. Professional services expense was higher, principally due to mortgage servicing review-related projects. Technology and communications expense was higher due to business expansion and technology projects. Marketing and business development expense for the first six months of 2012 increased over the same period of the prior year due to the timing of charitable contributions and payments-related initiatives. Other expense increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2012 over the same periods of the prior year, driven by higher mortgage servicing costs and the second quarter 2012 Visa accrual, partially offset by lower FDIC insurance expense. In addition, other expense for the first six months of 2012 increased over the same period of the prior year due to higher regulatory and insurance-related costs. These increases were partially offset by decreases in net occupancy and equipment expense, principally reflecting the change in presentation of ATM surcharge revenue passed through to others.

Income Tax Expense The provision for income taxes was $564 million (an effective rate of 29.0 percent) for the second quarter and $1.1 billion (an effective rate of 28.9 percent) for the first six months of 2012, compared with $458 million (an effective rate of 28.0 percent) and $824 million (an effective rate of 27.2 percent) for the same periods of 2011. The increases in the effective tax rate for the second quarter and first six months of 2012, compared with the same periods of the prior year, principally reflected the impact of higher pretax earnings year-over-year. For further information on income taxes, refer to Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Loans The Company’s total loan portfolio was $216.1 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $209.8 billion at December 31, 2011, an increase of $6.3 billion (3.0 percent). The increase was driven

primarily by increases in commercial loans, residential mortgages and commercial real estate loans, partially offset by lower credit card, other retail and covered loans. The $4.9 billion (8.6 percent) increase in commercial loans was driven by higher demand from new and existing customers.

Residential mortgages held in the loan portfolio increased $2.8 billion (7.7 percent) at June 30, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, reflecting origination and refinancing activity due to the low interest rate environment. Most loans retained in the portfolio are to customers with prime or near-prime credit characteristics at the date of origination.

Commercial real estate loans increased $706 million (2.0 percent) at June 30, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, reflecting higher demand from new and existing customers and acquired balances.

Total credit card loans decreased $455 million (2.6 percent) at June 30, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, the result of customers spending less and paying down their balances. Other retail loans, which include retail leasing, home equity and second mortgages and other retail loans, decreased $72 million (.1 percent) at June 30, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011. The decrease was primarily driven by lower home equity and second mortgages and student loan balances, partially offset by higher installment loan and retail leasing balances.

Loans Held for Sale Loans held for sale, consisting primarily of residential mortgages to be sold in the secondary market, were $8.3 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $7.2 billion at December 31, 2011. The increase in loans held for sale was principally due to an increase in mortgage loan origination and refinancing activity due to the low interest rate environment.

Most of the residential mortgage loans the Company originates follow guidelines that allow the loans to be sold into existing, highly liquid secondary markets; in particular in government agency transactions and to government sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”). The Company also originates residential mortgages that follow its own investment guidelines, primarily well secured jumbo mortgages to borrowers with high credit quality, and near-prime non-conforming mortgages, with the intent to hold such loans in the loan portfolio. The Company generally retains portfolio loans through maturity; however, the Company’s intent may change over time based upon various factors such as ongoing asset/liability management activities, assessment of product profitability, credit risk, liquidity needs, and capital implications. If the Company’s intent or ability to hold an existing portfolio loan changes, it is transferred to loans held for sale.

Investment Securities Investment securities totaled $73.9 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $70.8 billion at December 31, 2011. The $3.1 billion (4.4 percent) increase primarily reflected $2.7 billion of net investment purchases and a $.4 billion favorable change in net unrealized gains (losses). Held-to-maturity securities were $34.6 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $18.9 billion at December 31, 2011, due to a

transfer of approximately $11.7 billion of available-for-sale investment securities to the held-to-maturity category during the second quarter of 2012, reflecting the Company’s intent to hold those securities to maturity, and growth in government agency mortgage-backed securities as the Company continued to increase its on-balance sheet liquidity in response to anticipated regulatory requirements.

The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment portfolio to determine whether any securities are other-than-temporarily impaired. At June 30, 2012, the Company’s net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities was $814 million, compared with $581 million at December 31, 2011. The favorable change in net unrealized gains was primarily due to increases in the fair value of state and political and corporate debt securities, and to amounts recognized as other-than-temporary impairment in earnings. Gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities totaled $441 million at June 30, 2012, compared with $691 million at December 31, 2011. When assessing unrealized losses for other-than-temporary impairment, the Company considers the nature of the investment, the financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, expected cash flows of underlying assets and market conditions. At June 30, 2012, the Company had no plans to sell securities with unrealized losses and believes it is more likely than not that it would not be required to sell such securities before recovery of their amortized cost.

There is limited market activity for non-agency mortgage-backed securities held by the Company. As a result, the Company estimates the fair value of these securities using estimates of expected cash flows, discount rates and management’s assessment of various other market factors, which are judgmental in nature. The Company recorded $13 million and $21 million of impairment charges in earnings during the second quarter and first six months of 2012, respectively, on non-agency mortgage-backed securities. These impairment charges were due to changes in expected cash flows primarily resulting from increases in defaults in the underlying mortgage pools. During the second quarter of 2012, the Company also recognized impairment charges of $27 million in earnings related to certain perpetual preferred securities issued by financial institutions, following the recent downgrades of money center banks by a rating agency. The net unrealized loss for the Company’s investments in perpetual preferred securities was $2 million at June 30, 2012, and the unrealized loss on perpetual preferred securities in a loss position was $25 million. Further adverse changes in market conditions may result in additional impairment charges in future periods. Refer to Notes 2 and 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on investment securities.

Deposits Total deposits were $241.3 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $230.9 billion at December 31,

2011, the result of increases in time deposits greater than $100,000, savings accounts, noninterest bearing deposits and money market deposits, partially offset by decreases in interest checking deposits and time certificates less than $100,000. Time deposits greater than $100,000 increased $9.9 billion (36.0 percent) at June 30, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, primarily in Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate. Time deposits greater than $100,000 are managed as an alternate to other funding sources such as wholesale borrowing, based largely on relative pricing. Savings account balances increased $1.5 billion (5.5 percent), primarily due to continued strong participation in a savings product offered by Consumer and Small Business Banking that includes multiple bank products in a package. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $1.3 billion (1.9 percent), primarily due to higher Consumer and Small Business Banking balances. Money market balances increased $692 million (1.5 percent) primarily due to higher balances in Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate, partially offset by lower corporate trust balances. Interest checking balances decreased $2.7 billion (5.8 percent) primarily due to lower Wholesale Banking and Commercial Real Estate balances. Time certificates less than $100,000 were $388 million (2.6 percent) lower at June 30, 2012, compared with December 31, 2011, reflecting lower Consumer and Small Business Banking balances.

Borrowings The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings as part of its asset/liability management and funding strategies. Short-term borrowings, which include federal funds purchased, commercial paper, repurchase agreements, borrowings secured by high-grade assets and other short-term borrowings, were $30.7 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $30.5 billion at December 31, 2011. The $216 million (.7 percent) increase in short-term borrowings was primarily in commercial paper and other short-term borrowings, partially offset by lower repurchase agreements. Long-term debt was $28.8 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $32.0 billion at December 31, 2011. The $3.2 billion (9.8 percent) decrease was primarily due to $2.8 billion of medium-term note maturities, $2.2 billion of redemptions of junior subordinated debentures and a $.7 billion decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, partially offset by $2.3 billion of issuances of medium-term notes. Refer to the “Liquidity Risk Management” section for discussion of liquidity management of the Company.

CORPORATE RISK PROFILE

Overview Managing risks is an essential part of successfully operating a financial services company. The Company’s most prominent risk exposures are credit, residual value, operational, interest rate, market and liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan, investment or derivative contract when it is due. Residual value risk is the potential reduction in the end-of-term value of leased assets. Operational risk includes risks related to fraud, processing errors, technology, breaches of internal controls and in data security, and business continuation and disaster recovery. Operational risk also includes legal and compliance risks, including risks arising from the failure to adhere to laws, rules, regulations and internal policies and procedures. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates, which can affect the re-pricing of assets and liabilities differently. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and security prices that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as trading and available-for-sale securities, certain mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) and derivatives that are accounted for on a fair value basis. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, investors or borrowers. Further, corporate strategic decisions, as well as the risks described above, could give rise to reputation risk. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could result in costly litigation or cause a decline in the Company’s stock value, customer base, funding sources or revenue. In addition to the risks identified above, other risk factors exist that may impact the Company. Refer to “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, for a detailed discussion of these factors.

Credit Risk Management The Company’s strategy for credit risk management includes well-defined, centralized credit policies, uniform underwriting criteria, and ongoing risk monitoring and review processes for all commercial and consumer credit exposures. In evaluating its credit risk, the Company considers changes, if any, in underwriting activities, the loan portfolio composition (including product mix and geographic, industry or customer-specific concentrations), trends in loan performance, the level of allowance coverage relative to similar banking institutions and macroeconomic factors, such as changes in unemployment rates, gross domestic product, real estate values and consumer bankruptcy filings.

In addition, credit quality ratings, as defined by the Company, are an important part of the Company’s overall credit risk management and evaluation of its allowance for credit losses. Loans with a pass rating represent those not classified on the Company’s rating scale for problem credits, as minimal risk has been identified. Loans with a special mention or classified rating, including all of the Company’s loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing, nonaccrual loans, those loans considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), and loans in a junior lien position that are current but are behind a modified or delinquent loan in a first lien position, encompass all loans held by the Company that it considers to have a potential or well-defined weakness that may put full collection of contractual cash flows at risk. The Company’s internal credit quality ratings for consumer loans are primarily based on delinquency and nonperforming status, except for a limited population of larger loans within those portfolios that are individually evaluated. For this limited population, the determination of the internal credit quality rating may also consider collateral value and customer cash flows. The Company obtains recent collateral value estimates for the majority of its residential mortgage and home equity and second mortgage portfolios, which allows the Company to compute estimated loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios reflecting current market conditions. These individually refreshed LTV ratios are considered in the determination of the appropriate allowance for credit losses. The decline in housing prices over the past several years has deteriorated the collateral support of the residential mortgage, home equity and second mortgage portfolios. However, the underwriting criteria the Company employs consider the relevant income and credit characteristics of the borrower, such that the collateral is not the primary source of repayment. Refer to Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the Company’s loan portfolios including internal credit quality ratings. In addition, Refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Credit Risk Management” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, for a more detailed discussion on credit risk management processes.

The Company manages its credit risk, in part, through diversification of its loan portfolio and limit setting by product type criteria and concentrations. As part of its normal business activities, the Company offers a broad array of lending products. The Company categorizes its loan portfolio into three segments, which is the level at which it develops and documents a

systematic methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses. The Company’s three loan portfolio segments are commercial lending, consumer lending and covered loans. The commercial lending segment includes loans and leases made to small business, middle market, large corporate, commercial real estate, financial institution, and public sector customers. Key risk characteristics relevant to commercial lending segment loans include the industry and geography of the borrower’s business, purpose of the loan, repayment source, borrower’s debt capacity and financial flexibility, loan covenants, and nature of pledged collateral, if any. These risk characteristics, among others, are considered in determining estimates about the likelihood of default by the borrowers and the severity of loss in the event of default. The Company considers these risk characteristics in assigning internal risk ratings to, or forecasting losses on, these loans which are the significant factors in determining the allowance for credit losses for loans in the commercial lending segment.

The consumer lending segment represents loans and leases made to consumer customers including residential mortgages, credit card loans, and other retail loans such as revolving consumer lines, auto loans and leases, student loans, and home equity loans and lines. Home equity or second mortgage loans are junior lien closed-end accounts fully disbursed at origination. These loans typically are fixed rate loans, secured by residential real estate, with a 10 or 15 year fixed payment amortization schedule. Home equity lines are revolving accounts giving the borrower the ability to draw and repay balances repeatedly, up to a maximum commitment, and are secured by residential real estate. These include accounts in either a first or junior lien position. Typical terms on home equity lines are variable rates benchmarked to the prime rate, with a 15-year draw period during which a minimum payment is equivalent to the monthly interest, followed by a 10-year amortization period. At June 30, 2012, substantially all of the Company’s home equity lines were in the draw period. Key risk characteristics relevant to consumer lending segment loans primarily relate to the borrowers’ capacity and willingness to repay and include unemployment rates and other economic factors, customer payment history and in some cases, updated LTV information on real estate based loans. These risk characteristics, among others, are reflected in forecasts of delinquency levels, bankruptcies and losses which are the primary factors in determining the allowance for credit losses for the consumer lending segment.

The covered loan segment represents loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC that greatly reduce the risk of future credit losses to the Company. Key risk characteristics for covered segment loans are consistent with the segment they would otherwise be included in had the loss share coverage not been in place, but consider the indemnification provided by the FDIC.

The Company further disaggregates its loan portfolio segments into various classes based on their underlying risk characteristics. The two classes within the commercial lending segment are commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. The three classes within the consumer lending segment are residential mortgages, credit card loans and other retail loans. The covered loan segment consists of only one class.

The Company’s consumer lending segment utilizes several distinct business processes and channels to originate consumer credit, including traditional branch lending, indirect lending, portfolio acquisitions, third party originators, such as correspondent banks and loan brokers, and a consumer finance division. Generally, loans managed by the Company’s consumer finance division exhibit higher credit risk characteristics, but are priced commensurate with the differing risk profile. With respect to residential mortgages originated through these channels, the Company may either retain the loans on its balance sheet or sell its interest in the balances into the secondary market while retaining the servicing rights and customer relationships. For residential mortgages that are retained in the Company’s portfolio and for home equity and second mortgages, credit risk is also diversified by geography and managed by adherence to LTV and borrower credit criteria during the underwriting process.

The Company estimates updated LTV information quarterly, based on a method that combines automated valuation model updates and relevant home price indices. LTV is the ratio of the loan’s outstanding principal balance to the current estimate of property value. For home equity and second mortgages, combined loan-to-value (“CLTV”) is the combination of the first mortgage original principal balance and the second lien outstanding principal balance, relative to the current estimate of property value. Certain loans do not have a LTV or CLTV primarily due to lack of availability of relevant automated valuation model and/or home price indices values, or lack of necessary valuation data on acquired loans.

The following tables provide summary information for the LTVs of residential mortgages and home equity and second mortgages by distribution channel and type at June 30, 2012: