Dr. Lopez is the founder of the Company and has
served as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer for more than five years. Dr. Lopez has held various offices and served as a
director of the Company since its founding in 1984 with some interruptions in service.
Messrs. Brown, Connors and Saucedo and Drs.
Kovalchik, Sherman and Swinney have been engaged in their current occupations for more than five years. Mr. Connors previously served as a director
from December 1988 to July 1989. Dr. Swinney previously served as a director from 1989 to October 1995.
Board Committees and Attendance at Meetings
The Board of Directors has standing Audit,
Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees.
Audit Committee. The
Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, which consists of Messrs. Brown, Connors and Saucedo (Chairman). As more fully described in the Audit
Committee Charter, the Audit Committee oversees the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of its financial statements.
The Audit Committee met five times in 2004.
During 2004, the Audit Committee consisted of three
directors who are independent directors as defined under the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market System. The Companys Board of
Directors adopted a revised Audit Committee charter on July 25, 2003.
The Board of Directors has determined that Joseph R.
Saucedo is an audit committee financial expert and is independent, as both those terms are defined by Securities and Exchange
Commission regulations.
Compensation
Committee. The Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee, consisting of Messrs. Brown, Connors and Saucedo, Drs.
Kovalchik (Chairman), Sherman and Swinney. The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors under the
listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market System. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of
Directors on July 25, 2003, a copy of which can be found on the Companys web site, www.icumed.com. The Compensation Committee, as more
fully described in the Compensation Committee Report, discharges the responsibilities of the Board of Directors relating to executive and director
compensation, and oversees incentive, equity based and other compensatory plans in which executive officers and key employees of the Company
participate, including authorization of the grant of stock options. The Compensation Committee met four times in 2004.
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (the Nominating Committee) consists of Drs. Kovalchik,
Sherman and Swinney, each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is independent under the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market
System. The Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2003, a copy of which can be
found on the Companys web site, www.icumed.com. The Nominating Committees role is to recommend to the Board of Directors policies on
Board composition and criteria for Board membership, to identify individuals qualified to serve as directors and approve candidates for director and to
recommend directors for appointment to committees of the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee also makes recommendations to the Board of
Directors concerning the Companys corporate governance guidelines and codes of ethics and business conduct, oversees internal investigations of
conduct of senior executives, if necessary, and conducts evaluations of the performance of the Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee, which was
first appointed on October 17, 2003, met once in 2004.
In evaluating and determining whether to recommend a
person as a candidate for election as a director, the Nominating Committee considers, among other things, relevant management and/or industry
experience; values such as integrity, accountability, judgment and adherence to high performance standards; independence pursuant to the guidelines set
forth in the listing standards of the Nasdaq National Market System; ability and willingness to undertake the requisite time commitment to Board
service; and an absence of conflicts of interest with the Company.
5
The Nominating Committee may employ a variety of
methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating Committee will assess the need for particular expertise on the Board of
Directors, the upcoming election cycle of the Board and whether any vacancies on the Board of Directors are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In
the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating Committee will consider various potential candidates for director that may
come to the Nominating Committees attention through current directors, the Companys professional advisors, stockholders or
others.
The Nominating Committee will consider candidates
recommended by stockholders. The deadlines and procedures for stockholder recommendations of director candidates are the same as those described below
under Nomination of Directors and Stockholder Proposals. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates,
the Nominating Committee will make an initial analysis of the qualifications of any candidate recommended by stockholders or others pursuant to the
criteria summarized above to determine whether the candidate is qualified for service on the Companys Board before deciding to undertake a
complete evaluation of the candidate. Other than the verification of compliance with procedures and stockholder status, and the initial analysis
performed by the Nominating Committee, a potential candidate nominated by a stockholder will be treated like any other potential candidate during the
review process by the Nominating Committee.
The Nominating Committee has approved the
nominations of John J. Connors, Esquire, Michael T. Kovalchik, III, M.D. and Joseph R. Saucedo for reelection as directors at the Annual Meeting. The
Nominating Committee considered the candidates past contributions to the Board of Directors, their willingness to continue to serve and the
benefits of continuity in the membership of the Board of Directors and determined that the reelection of the three candidates was
appropriate.
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics for Officers, and a copy is available on the Companys website, www.icumed.com.
During 2004, the Board met nine times. Each director
attended more than 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board and any committees on which he serves.
It is the policy of the Company to invite and
encourage all members of the board of directors to attend the annual meeting. In 2004, one director attended the annual meeting.
Communications with Board of Directors
The Companys Board of Directors has an
established process for stockholder communications. Stockholders may contact any of our Directors, including the Chairman, by writing to them c/o ICU
Medical, Inc. 951 Calle Amanecer, San Clemente, California 92673. Communications addressed to the Board of Directors will be reviewed by the Secretary
of the Company and directed to the Chairman of the Board for further review and distribution to certain or all members of the Board of Directors, if
and as appropriate. Communications addressed to individual directors will be forwarded directly to the named director. Stockholders may also contact
the Board by sending e-mail to ir@icumed.com.
Any communications directed to the Board of
Directors, the Chairman or any other member of the Board that allege or report any complaint or concern regarding accounting, internal accounting
controls or auditing matters are immediately forwarded to the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Complaints or concerns may be reported in writing or
by telephoning our Corporate Governance Hotline at 1-800-886-0868. All calls are confidential.
In the past year, the Board of Directors did not
receive any stockholder communications that it considered material and therefore took no action.
6
Executive Compensation
Compensation Committee Report
During 2004, the Compensation Committee consisted of
six directors who are not employees or former employees of, or consultants to, the Company. The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the
Company and the Chief Executive Officer, sets performance objectives, establishes the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, and authorizes the
grant of options to employees.
The Companys policy in compensating executive
officers is to establish methods and levels of compensation that will provide strong incentives to promote the profitability and growth of the Company
and reward superior performance and that are sufficiently competitive to attract, retain and motivate highly competent management personnel.
Compensation of executive officers includes base salary, performance-based incentive bonuses and stock-based programs.
The Compensation Committee has adopted an executive
compensation policy which provides a base salary and, if certain performance objectives are met, incentive bonuses and stock options. Upon achievement
of performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee, officers other than Dr. Lopez could receive, in addition to base salaries, bonuses
in amounts ranging from 20% to 33% of their base salaries, and higher amounts in certain circumstances for unusual achievements. The Compensation
Committee believes that performance-based and stock-based compensation serves to align the interests of the executive officers with the interests of
the Companys stockholders.
With the exception of one bonus for a designated
achievement over a period of several years, no cash bonuses were paid to officers for 2004.
The base salary paid to Dr. Lopez in 2004 was set by
the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Companys executive compensation policy at near the middle of the range of total compensation
paid to chief executive officers of companies that the Compensation Committee deemed to be comparable to the Company. Dr. Lopez did not receive any
cash bonus in 2004. Dr. Lopez was granted options to purchase 100,000 shares in the first half of 2004. The executive compensation policy sets the
incentive bonuses and the value of stock options to be awarded to Dr. Lopez at a higher percentage of his base salary than that awarded to other
officers. The Compensation Committee believes that in view of the Chief Executive Officers overall responsibility for the success of the Company,
it is appropriate that a larger portion of his compensation be contingent on performance.
April 8, 2005
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Michael T. Kovalchik III, M.D., Chairman
Jack
W. Brown
John J. Connors
Joseph R. Saucedo
Richard H. Sherman, M.D.
Robert S. Swinney, M.D.
7
Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation
The following table shows the compensation earned
for the past three years by each of the Companys executive officers whose 2004 compensation exceeded $100,000 (the named executive
officers).
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
Long Term Compensation
|
|
Name and Position
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Bonus (1)
|
|
Securities Underlying Options (#)(1)
|
|
All Other Compensation ($)
|
George A.
Lopez |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
340,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
(2) |
|
$ |
62,508 |
(3) |
Chairman of
the Board,
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
(2) |
|
|
48,069 |
(3) |
President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
374,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
(2) |
|
|
44,369 |
(3) |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(2) |
|
|
2,562 |
(4) |
Secretary,
Treasurer and
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
|
|
|
27,750 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,400 |
(4) |
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(2) |
|
|
2,125 |
(4) |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
(6) |
|
|
10,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,375 |
(4) |
Vice
President of Sales
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
183,333 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,500 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,125 |
(4) |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
(2) |
|
|
1,875 |
(4) |
Vice
President of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
130,667 |
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
(2) |
|
|
2,033 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
116,792 |
|
|
|
33,900 |
|
|
|
23,750 |
(2) |
|
|
1,884 |
(4) |
Alison D. Burcar
(5) |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
113,249 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
(2) |
|
|
0 |
|
Vice
President of Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
(2) |
|
|
50 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
79,333 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
(2) |
|
|
184 |
(4) |
(1) |
|
Bonus amounts are included in the year earned rather than the
year actually paid; a portion is paid in the following year. |
(2) |
|
Options to acquire shares of the Company. |
(3) |
|
Includes dollar value of life insurance premiums paid by the
Company, based on the cost of term life insurance, plus the dollar value, on an actuarial basis, of the net cash surrender value accruing to the Diana
Lopez Insurance Trust as owner of the life insurance policy on Dr. Lopez of $59,956 in 2004, $45,569 in 2003 and $42,244 in 2002 and Company matching
contributions under Section 401(k) retirement plan for employees of $2,562 in 2004, $2,500 in 2003 and $2,125 in 2002. |
(4) |
|
Company matching contribution under section 401(k) retirement
plan. |
(5) |
|
Ms. Burcar is the niece of Dr. Lopez. |
(6) |
|
Paid after achievement of a designated goal set in
2001. |
Annual salary amounts for 2005 are: Dr. Lopez
$500,000; Mr. OBrien $290,000; Mr. Costello $190,000; Mr. Riggs $180,000; Ms. Burcar $120,000.
Stock Option Grants
Options to purchase Common Stock of the Company were
granted in 2004 to employees under the ICU Medical, Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (1993 Plan), which provided for the grant of options to
purchase up to 7,162,500 shares. The exercise price of options granted under the 1993 Plan is the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of
grant. All options granted under the 1993 Plan through April 2000 expire eleven years from issuance and are time-accelerated options which vest upon
the earlier of the Company achieving specific operating performance levels or ten years from the date of grant. Options granted since
8
April 2000
expire eleven years from issuance and vest in equal annual amounts on the first, second
and third anniversary of issuance except for time-accelerated options granted in 2002 and
2003 on 22,500 and 45,000 shares, respectively; 37,500 of those options vest five years
from issuance, and the balance ten years from issuance, unless vesting is accelerated
upon achievement of performance goals. The Company may issue more time-accelerated
options in the future. The 1993 Plan expired January 31, 2005.
The Company has a 2003 Stock Option plan (the
2003 Plan) which provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 1,500,00 shares. The exercise price of options granted under the 2003
Plan is the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. All options granted under the 2003 Plan expire ten years from issuance. The
Company granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock under the 2003 Plan in 2004.
On December 28, 2004, the Board of Directors of the
Company approved amendments to the vesting provisions of certain stock options outstanding under the 1993 Plan to provide that certain unvested stock
options with an exercise price above the December 28, 2004 closing price for the Companys Common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market shall become
exercisable on the later of December 31, 2004 or six months from the date such stock option was granted. As a result of the amendment, stock options
covering 468,947 shares became exercisable on December 31, 2004 and options covering an additional 13,250 will become exercisable during the first six
months of 2005. The vesting provisions of stock options that vest based on performance criteria were not amended. There were no other changes to any
stock options.
The Board of Directors has decided to substantially
curtail grants of stock options in the future. It believes that the amended vesting provisions will partially mitigate the resulting reduction in
employees equity-based incentive compensation. The Company has decided to follow the modified prospective method in implementing
recent amendments by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The acceleration will reduce the amortization
of the Companys stock option compensation expense for 2005 and 2006. The Board believes that this reduction will enhance comparability of the
Companys financial statements with those of prior and subsequent years.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants
|
|
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rate of Stock Price
Appreciation For Option Term
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#)
|
|
% of Total Options Granted to Employees in 2004
|
|
Exercise or Base Price Per Share ($/Share)
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
5% ($)(1)
|
|
10% ($)(1)
|
George A. Lopez,
M.D. |
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
31.19 |
|
|
|
4/16/14 |
|
|
$ |
1,961,837 |
|
|
$ |
4,971,680 |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
32.61 |
|
|
|
4/8/15 |
|
|
|
289,552 |
|
|
|
755,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
31.19 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
276,988 |
|
|
|
722,600 |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
32.61 |
|
|
|
4/8/15 |
|
|
|
231,642 |
|
|
|
604,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
31.19 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
221,590 |
|
|
|
578,080 |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
33.77 |
|
|
|
2/13/15 |
|
|
|
83,959 |
|
|
|
219,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
31.19 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
77,557 |
|
|
|
202,328 |
|
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
33.77 |
|
|
|
2/13/15 |
|
|
|
59,970 |
|
|
|
156,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
31.19 |
|
|
|
4/16/15 |
|
|
|
55,398 |
|
|
|
144,520 |
|
(1) |
|
The rates of stock appreciation reflected in the table are
assumed solely for the purpose of compliance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the disclosure of executive
compensation. The Companys Common Stock has at times appreciated at rates substantially different than the assumed rates and at other times the
value of the Common Stock has declined. Neither the |
9
|
|
assumed appreciation rates nor the actual changes in the share
value of the Companys common stock since the dates of option grants are necessarily indicative of any future value of the Common Stock. The
actual realizable value of the options may be substantially greater or less than that reflected in the table depending on the actual changes in the
share value during the options terms. |
Stock Option Exercises and Holdings
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2004 AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
The following table contains information about stock
options of the Company exercised during 2004, and stock options held at December 31, 2004, by the named executive officers of the Company. It excludes
activity under the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Name
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired on Exercise
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Number of Options at Year-End (#) Exercisable/Unexercisable
|
|
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options At Year-End ($)
Exercisable/Unexercisable
|
George A. Lopez,
M.D. |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
736,718 |
|
|
|
3,094,429 / 33,334 |
|
|
$ |
41,614,550 / $39,667 |
|
Francis J.
OBrien |
|
|
|
|
77,085 |
|
|
|
2,116,672 |
|
|
|
64,972 / 0 |
|
|
|
12,692 / 0 |
|
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
20,000 / 0 |
|
|
|
91,759 / 0 |
|
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
382,415 |
|
|
|
80,527 / 15,000 |
|
|
|
589,219 / 51,600 |
|
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
93,762 |
|
|
|
52,501 / 0 |
|
|
|
194,949 / 0 |
|
10
Performance Graph
The following graph shows the total stockholder
return on the Companys Common Stock based on the market price of the Common Stock from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2004 and the total returns
of the Nasdaq Stock Market National Market Tier Index and Common Stocks of a peer group selected by the Company for the same period.
COMPARISON OF TOTAL RETURN FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004
AMONG
ICU MEDICAL, INC., THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET INDEX AND PEER GROUP
|
|
|
|
1/1/99
|
|
12/31/2000
|
|
12/31/2001
|
|
12/31/2002
|
|
12/31/2003
|
|
12/31/2004
|
ICU Medical,
Inc. |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
197.5 |
|
|
|
291.8 |
|
|
|
366.9 |
|
|
|
337.3 |
|
|
|
268.9 |
|
Nasdaq |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
Peer
Group |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
152.2 |
|
|
|
213.1 |
|
|
|
152.7 |
|
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
233.1 |
|
Assumes $100 invested on January 1, 1998 in the
Companys Common Stock, the Nasdaq Stock Market National Market Tier Index and the Peer Group.
The companies in the peer group selected by the
Company are Merit Medical Systems, Inc., Microtek Medical Holdings, Inc., ResMed, Inc., Utah Medical Products, Inc. and Vital Signs, Inc. The basis for
the selection of the companies in the peer group is that, like the Company, they are all small to mid-size producers of medical
products.
Directors Compensation
During 2004, the Company paid directors who were not
employees of the Company an annual retainer of $10,000 plus $1,000 per day for attendance at meetings of the Board and $500 if the meeting was
conducted telephonically. Pay for attendance at meetings of Committees of the Board was $750 per day, and $375 if the meeting was conducted
telephonically. In addition, under the 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan, each non-employee director was automatically awarded options to purchase
1,875 shares of Common stock each quarter in 2004.
On January 29, 2005, the Board of Directors revised
the compensation for directors who are not employees of the Company to provide for the following: each director will receive an annual retainer of
$24,000, payable currently, an annual retainer of $12,000 payable on a deferred basis, plus $1,000 per day for attendance at meetings of the Board and
$500 if the meeting is conducted telephonically. Pay for attendance at meetings of Committees of the Board is $750 per day and $375 if the meeting is
conducted telephonically. Each Chairperson of a Committee of the Board also receives an annual retainer of $5,000 plus an additional pay for attendance
at each meeting of the Committee of $750 per day and $375 if the meeting is conducted telephonically.
11
The Board suspended all future grants of options to
purchase common stock of the Company under the 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan.
Employment Agreements
The Company enters into employment agreements with
each named executive officer for semi-annual periods ending on June 30 and December 31, and they may be renewed for successive six-month periods upon
expiration, unless terminated. They provide for an annual base salary and a bonus payable in cash based on achievement of performance goals. Under the
employment agreement with Dr. Lopez, he received quarterly grants of options to acquire the Companys stock. Under employment agreements with the
other officers, options to acquire the Companys stock were awarded based on achievement of performance goals.
On December 28, 2004, the Board of Directors of the
Company approved amendments to the vesting provisions of certain stock options outstanding under the 1993 Plan to provide that certain unvested stock
options with an exercise price above the December 28, 2004 closing price for the Companys Common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market shall become
exercisable on the later of December 31, 2004 or six months from the date such stock option was granted. As a result of the amendment, stock options
covering 443,250 shares became exercisable on December 31, 2004 and options covering an additional 13,250 will become exercisable during the first six
months of 2005. The vesting provisions of stock options that vest based on performance criteria were not amended. There were no other changes to any
stock options.
The options that were amended included those listed
below held by officers of the Company:
Officer
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares Subject to Options
|
|
Price Range
|
Dr. George A.
Lopez |
|
|
|
|
183,333 |
|
|
$29.27$36.87 |
Alison D.
Burcar |
|
|
|
|
7,333 |
|
|
$29.56$36.03 |
Richard A.
Costello |
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
$36.17 |
Steven C.
Riggs |
|
|
|
|
13,750 |
|
|
$29.56$36.35 |
Grants of options under employment agreements were
suspended in 2004. The Committee approved grants of options to the officers in April 2004 unrelated to the achievement of performance goals, and no
options have been granted since them. All options vest six months from the date of issuance. Options granted to Dr. Lopez expire ten years from
issuance; all other options expire eleven years from issuance.
The Company also has an agreement with Dr. Lopez
which generally provides that, in the event the Company undergoes a change in control, as defined, and his employment is terminated, or certain
negative changes in condition of employment occur, within 24 months of a change in control, he will be entitled to three times his annual salary and
bonus, payment of bonus through the date of termination or change in conditions, and continuation of benefits for three years, and any stock options he
holds will vest in full. In addition, if any payments are subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, he
will be entitled to a gross up of payments to offset the effect of the excise tax. The Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction for
any payments made under the agreement that are subject to the excise tax.
On January 29, 2005, the Board of Directors approved
the 2005 Long Term Retention Plan. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee shall periodically determine, after advice from and consultation with the
chief Executive Officer (CEO), the award to each participant, except that the Compensation Committee shall determine the award to the CEO,
without advice from or consultation with the CEO.
Awards are payable, except with respect to the CEO,
at the sole direction of the CEO on the sixth anniversary of the award, or sooner if Dr. George A. Lopez ceases to be CEO. The award to the CEO is
payable at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee on the sixth anniversary of the award. To receive payment of an award, a participant must
be an employee of the Company at the time payment is due. The amount of the awards is subject to increase of up to 200% based upon increases in the
price of the
12
Companys common stock or market capitalization. The following awards were made on January 29, 2005:
Dr. Lopez $1,000,000; Mr. OBrien $500,000;
Mr. Costello $333,000; Mr. Riggs $400,000; Ms. Burcar $220,000.
Life Insurance
The Diana Lopez Insurance Trust is the owner of a $3
million life insurance policy on Dr. Lopez. The Company has in the past advanced funds to pay the premium on the policy. The Company has a collateral
assignment entitling it to recover, generally from the value of the policy, all premiums paid on the policy. Because of legislative changes, the
Company has ceased paying premiums on the policy, and has not reached agreement with Dr. Lopez or the owner of the policy on the disposition of the
policy. The 2003 and 2004 premiums have not been paid. The total premiums paid to date are $479,000 and the net surrender value of the policy is
approximately $444,000. If no further premiums are paid and no other action is taken, the policy will lapse in approximately fourteen years, at which
time it will have no value.
SELECTION OF AUDITORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, as independent auditors of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2005, and has further directed
that management submit the selection of independent auditors for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Deloitte & Touche LLP
audited the Companys financial statements for the first time in 2002. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at
the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Paid to Auditors
It is the policy of our Audit Committee to have the
engagement of our independent auditor to perform any audit or non-audit services approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Such approval authority is
delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee on behalf of the Audit Committee as permitted by the Audit Committee Charter.
Deloitte & Touche LLP was our independent
auditor for the past three years. Fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the past two years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Audit fees
financial statements |
|
|
|
$ |
195,290 |
|
|
$ |
190,360 |
|
Audit fees
internal controls over financial reporting |
|
|
|
|
529,494 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Audit related
fees |
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
19,250 |
|
Tax
fees |
|
|
|
|
65,286 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
All other
fees |
|
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Audit related
services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seminar |
|
|
|
$ |
-0- |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
SEC
filings |
|
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Special audit
procedures |
|
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
Accounting
consultation |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
$ |
19,250 |
|
The engagement for all audit related services was
approved in advance by our Audit Committee.
Audit Committee Report
The Companys audited consolidated financial
statements are included in the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders and Form 10-K. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed those
financial statements with management of the Company and has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement
on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended.
13
Further, the Committee has received the written disclosures and
the letter from the independent auditors required by Independence Standards Board
Standards No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as amended, and has discussed the independent auditors independence with
them. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial
statements be included in the Companys Annual Report to Stockholders and Form 10-K.
April 8, 2005
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Joseph R. Saucedo, Chairman
John J. Connors
Jack W. Brown
OTHER MATTERS
The Company knows of no other matters to be brought
before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented for action, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote on such
matters in their discretion.
ANNUAL REPORT
The Companys Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 2004 is being mailed to all stockholders together with this Proxy Statement. The Companys Annual Report is also posted on the
Companys web site, www.icumed.com.
THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE, WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF
ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED SCHEDULES, FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON REQUEST IN
WRITING FROM ANY PERSON WHO WAS A HOLDER OF RECORD, OR WHO REPRESENTS IN GOOD FAITH THAT HE OR SHE WAS A BENEFICIAL OWNER, OF COMMON STOCK OF THE
COMPANY ON MARCH 28, 2005. ANY SUCH REQUEST SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY AT 951 CALLE AMANECER, SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673. THE
COMPANYS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K IS ALSO POSTED ON THE COMPANYS WEB SITE, WWW.ICUMED.COM.
14
NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS AND
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
Any stockholder who intends to nominate persons for
election as directors at an annual meeting shall give timely written notice to the Secretary of the Company setting forth (a) as to each nominee whom
the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of the
nominee, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the nominee, (iii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the corporation which are
beneficially owned by the nominee and (iv) any other information concerning the nominee that would be required under the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee; and (b) as to the stockholder giving the notice, (i) the
name and record address of the stockholder and (ii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Company which are beneficially owned by the
stockholder. Such notice shall include a signed consent of each such nominee to serve as a director of the Company, if elected. The Company may require
any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by the Company to determine the eligibility for such proposed
nominee to serve as a director of the Company. Any stockholder who intends to propose any business at a meeting shall give timely written notice to the
Secretary of the Company setting forth as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the meeting (i) a brief description of the business
to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for conducting the business at the meeting, (ii) the name and record address of the stock holder
giving the notice, (iii) the class and number of shares of capital stock of the Company that are beneficially owned by the stockholder, and by any
other stockholders known by the stockholder giving the notice to be supporting the proposal and (iv) any material or financial interest of the
stockholder in such business. Either of the notices described above will be timely if it is delivered to or mailed and received at the Companys
executive offices not less than 50 days nor more than 75 days prior to the date of the annual meeting, unless the Company has given less than 60 days
notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting, in which case the notice must be received by the Company not less than 10 days after
notice of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the meeting was made. A proposal that a stockholder wants the Company to include
in the Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices by December 13, 2005 or if the
date of the annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from May 13, then the deadline is a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and
mail its proxy materials, to be included in the Proxy Statement for that meeting, and all other conditions for such inclusion must be
satisfied.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the Companys officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of the Companys Common Stock to file reports on prescribed
forms regarding ownership of and transactions in the Common Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish copies of such forms to
the Company. Based solely on a review of the forms received by it, the Company believes that with respect to 2004 the following Section 16(a) filings
were not filed on a timely basis: one Form 4 filing for Joseph Saucedo and two Form 4 filings and one Form 4/A filing for Dr.
Kovalchik.
15
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The cost of this solicitation of proxies will be
borne by the Company. Solicitations will be made by mail, telephone or telegram and personally by directors, officers and other employees of the
Company, but such persons will not receive compensation for such services over and above their regular salaries. The Company will reimburse brokers,
banks, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their reasonable charges and expenses in
forwarding proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of such stock.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Francis J. OBrien, Secretary
16
|
|
|
The shares represented by this Proxy will be voted as directed herein, but if no directions are indicated, will be voted FOR the election of all nominees of the Board of Directors and FOR Proposal 2. |
Please Mark Here for Address Change or Comments
|
¨ |
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
|
ITEM 2. |
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY SELECTION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS AUDITORS FOR THE COMPANY |
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees: |
|
|
WITHHOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
FOR ALL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 John J. Connors 02 Michael T. Kovalchik, III, M.D. 03 Joseph R. Saucedo |
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
Choose MLinksm for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on to Investor ServiceDirect® at www.melloninvestor.com/isd where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withheld for the nominee you list below: (Write that nominees name in the space provided below.)
|
|
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full
title as such.
/\ FOLD AND DETACH HERE /\
Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to annual meeting day.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internet http://www.proxyvoting.com/icui
Use the internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site. |
|
OR |
|
Telephone 1-866-540-5760
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call. |
|
Mail Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. |
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
|
|
|
PROXY
|
|
|
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ICU MEDICAL, INC. |
|
|
The undersigned hereby appoints George A. Lopez, M.D. and Francis J. OBrien, and each of them, with power to
act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the shares of ICU Medical, Inc. Common Stock which the undersigned is
entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held May 13, 2005 or any adjournment thereof, with all powers which the undersigned
would possess if present at the Meeting. | |
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued, and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) |
|
|
|
|
|
Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side) |
|
|
/\ FOLD AND DETACH HERE /\