Edgar Filing: AMPHENOL CORP /DE/

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
x		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006

or

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-10879

AMPHENOL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware		22-2785165
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492
203-265-8900
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone
Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s
Principal Executive Offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value		New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
(Title Of Each Class)		(Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act).
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer x, Accelerated filer o, Non-accelerated filer o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of Amphenol Corporation Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value, held by non-affiliates was approximately $4,998 million based on the reported last sale price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2006.

As of January 31, 2007, the total number of shares outstanding of registrant’s Class A Common Stock was 89,027,518.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement, which is expected to be filed within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

INDEX

			Page
PART I
	Item 1.	Business		3
		General		3
		Business Segments		5
		International Operations		6
		Customers		6
		Manufacturing		7
		Research and Development		7
		Trademarks and Patents		7
		Competition		8
		Backlog		8
		Employees		8
		Environmental Matters		8
		Other		9
		Cautionary Statements for Purposes of Forward Looking Information		9
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors		9
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		12
	Item 2.	Properties		12
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		12
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		12

PART II				13
	Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		13
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		15
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		28
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		29
		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		29
		Consolidated Statements of Income		31
		Consolidated Balance Sheets		32
		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Other Comprehensive Income		33
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow		34
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		35
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		52
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		52
	Item 9B.	Other Information		53

PART III				53
	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		53
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation		53
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		53
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		54
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		54

PART IV				54
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		54
		Signature of the Registrant		57
		Signatures of the Directors		57

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

Amphenol Corporation (“Amphenol” or the “Company”) is one of the world’s largest designers, manufacturers and marketers of electrical, electronic and fiber optic connectors, interconnect systems and coaxial and flat-ribbon cable. The Company was incorporated in 1987. Certain predecessor businesses, which now constitute part of the Company, have been in business since 1932. The primary end markets for the Company’s products are:

· communication systems for the converging technologies of voice, video and data communications;

· a broad range of industrial applications including factory automation and motion control systems, medical and industrial instrumentation, mass transportation and natural resource exploration, and automotive applications; and

· commercial aerospace and military applications.

The Company’s strategy is to provide its customers with comprehensive design capabilities, a broad selection of products and a high level of service on a worldwide basis while maintaining continuing programs of productivity improvement and cost control. For 2006, the Company reported net sales, operating income and net income of $2,471.4 million, $424.6 million and $255.7 million, respectively. The table below summarizes information regarding the Company’s primary markets and end applications for the Company’s products:

	Information Technology & Communications	Industrial/Automotive	Commercial Aerospace and Military

Percentage of Sales	61%	21%	18%

Primary End Applications	Wireless Communication Systems · wireless handsets and personal communication devices · wireless infrastructure equipment · base stations · cell sites Broadband Networks · cable television networks · set top converters · highspeed data kits · cable modems	Factory automation Instrumentation Automobile safety systems and other on board electronics Mass transportation Oil exploration Off-road construction Medical equipment Satellite radio systems	Military and Commercial Aircraft · avionics · engine controls · flight controls · passenger related systems Missile systems Battlefield communications Satellite and space programs Radar systems Military vehicles Ordnance

	Telecommunications and Data Communications
	· servers and storage systems
	· computers, personal computers and related peripherals
	· data networking equipment
	· routers, switches

The Company designs and manufactures connectors and interconnect systems which are used primarily to conduct electrical and optical signals for a wide range of sophisticated electronic applications. The Company believes, based primarily on published market research, that it is the third largest connector manufacturer in the world. The Company has developed a broad range of connector and interconnect products for the information technology and communications equipment applications including the converging voice, video and data communications markets. The Company offers a broad range of interconnect products for factory automation, machine tools, instrumentation and medical systems, mass transportation applications and automotive applications, including airbags, pretensioner seatbelts and other on board automotive electronics. In addition, the Company is the leading supplier of high performance, military-specification, circular environmental connectors that require superior reliability and performance under conditions of stress and in hostile environments. These conditions are frequently encountered in commercial and military aerospace applications and other demanding industrial applications such as oil exploration, medical instrumentation and off-road construction.

The Company is a global manufacturer employing advanced manufacturing processes. The Company designs, manufactures and assembles its products at facilities in the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia. The Company sells its products through its own global sales force and independent manufacturers’ representatives and a global network of electronics distributors to thousands of OEMs in approximately 60 countries throughout the world. The Company also sells certain products to electronic manufacturing services (EMS) and original design manufacturing (ODM) companies, and to communication network operators. For the year 2006, approximately 47% of the Company’s net sales were in North America, 21% were in Europe and 32% were in Asia and other countries.

The Company generally implements its product development strategy through product design teams and collaboration arrangements with customers which result in the Company obtaining approved vendor status for its customers’ new products and programs. The Company seeks to have its products become widely accepted within the industry for similar applications and products manufactured by other potential customers, which the Company believes will provide additional sources of future revenue. By developing application specific products, the Company has decreased its exposure to standard products which generally experience greater pricing pressure. In addition to product design teams and customer collaboration arrangements, the Company uses key account managers to manage customer relationships on a global basis such that it can bring to bear its total resources to meet the worldwide needs of its multinational customers.

The Company and industry analysts estimate that the worldwide sales of interconnect products were approximately $40 billion in 2006. The Company believes that the worldwide industry for interconnect products and systems is highly fragmented with over 2,000 producers of connectors and interconnect systems worldwide, of which the 10 largest, including Amphenol, accounted for a combined market share of approximately 53% in 2006.

The Company’s acquisition strategy is focused on the consolidation of this highly fragmented industry. The Company targets acquisitions on a global basis in high growth segments that have complementary capabilities to the Company from a product, customer or geographic standpoint. The Company looks to add value to those smaller companies through its global capabilities and generally expects acquisitions to be accretive to performance in the first year. In the year 2006 the Company spent approximately $22 million on acquisitions, including payments for performance-based additional cash consideration. This represented two small acquisitions in target markets, including the data communications and industrial/medical markets, that broadened and enhanced its product offering in these areas. In December 2005, the Company purchased the connection systems business (“TCS”) of Teradyne Inc. for approximately $385 million. TCS had sales of approximately $373 million in 2005 and, the Company believes, is the leader in high speed, high density, printed circuit board interconnect products. TCS sells its products primarily to the data communications, wireless infrastructure and storage and server markets. The TCS acquisition is almost entirely complementary to Amphenol from a product standpoint and allows the Company to offer a complete and integrated interconnect solution for customers in the communications markets, significantly enhancing the Company’s position.

Business Segments

The following table sets forth the dollar amounts of the Company’s net trade sales for its business segments. For a discussion of factors affecting changes in sales by business segment and additional segment financial data, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 9 in the Company’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

	2006		2005		2004
	(dollars in thousands)
Net trade sales by business segment:
Interconnect products and assemblies	$	2,207,508	$	1,592,439	$	1,333,838
Cable products	263,922		215,708		196,608

	$	2,471,430	$	1,808,147	$	1,530,446

Net trade sales by geographic area (1):
United States operations	$	1,059,974	$	802,351	$	674,302
International operations	1,411,456		1,005,796		856,144
	$	2,471,430	$	1,808,147	$	1,530,446

(1) Based on customer location to which product is shipped.

Interconnect Products and Assemblies. The Company produces a broad range of interconnect products and assemblies primarily for voice, video and data communication systems, commercial aerospace and military systems, automotive and mass transportation applications, and industrial and factory automation equipment. Interconnect products include connectors, which when attached to an electronic or fiber optic cable, a printed circuit board or other device, facilitate electronic or fiber optic transmission. Interconnect assemblies generally consist of a system of cable and connectors for linking electronic and fiber optic equipment. The Company designs and produces a broad range of connector and cable assembly products used in communication applications, such as: engineered cable assemblies used in base stations for wireless communication systems and internet networking equipment; smart card acceptor devices used in mobile telephones, set top boxes and other applications to facilitate reading data from smart cards; fiber optic connectors used in fiber optic signal transmission; backplane and input/output connectors and assemblies used for servers and data storage devices and linking personal computers and peripheral equipment; sculptured flexible circuits used for integrating printed circuit boards in communication applications and hinge products used in mobile phone and other mobile communication devices. The Company also designs and produces a broad range of radio frequency connector products and antennas used in telecommunications, computer and office equipment, instrumentation equipment, local area networks and automotive electronics. The Company’s radio frequency interconnect products and assemblies are also used in base stations, mobile communication devices and other components of cellular and personal communications networks.

The Company believes that it is the largest supplier of high performance, military-specification, circular environmental connectors. Such connectors require superior performance and reliability under conditions of stress and in hostile environments. High performance environmental connectors and interconnect systems are generally used to interconnect electronic and fiber optic systems in sophisticated aerospace, military, commercial and industrial equipment. These applications present demanding technological requirements in that the connectors are subject to rapid and severe temperature changes, vibration, humidity and nuclear radiation. Frequent applications of these connectors and interconnect systems include aircraft, guided missiles, radar, military vehicles, equipment for spacecraft, energy, medical instrumentation, geophysical applications and off-road construction equipment. The Company also designs and produces industrial interconnect products used in a variety of applications such as factory automation equipment, mass transportation applications including railroads and marine transportation; and automotive safety products including interconnect devices and systems used in automotive airbags, pretensioner seatbelts, antilock braking systems and other on board automotive electronic systems. The Company also designs and produces highly-engineered cable and backplane assemblies. Such assemblies are specially designed by the Company in conjunction with OEM customers for specific applications, primarily for computer, wired and wireless communication systems, office equipment and aerospace applications. The cable assemblies utilize the Company’s connector and cable products as well as components purchased from others.

Cable Products. The Company designs, manufactures and markets coaxial cable primarily for use in the cable television industry. The Company’s Times Fiber Communications subsidiary is the world’s second largest producer of coaxial cable for the cable television market. The Company believes that its Times Fiber Communications unit is one of the lowest cost producers of coaxial cable for cable television. The Company’s coaxial cable and connector products are used in cable television systems including full service cable television/ telecommunication systems being installed by cable operators and telecommunication companies offering video, voice and data services. The Company is also a major supplier of coaxial cable to the international cable television market. The Company manufactures two primary types of coaxial cable: semi-flexible, which has an aluminum tubular shield, and flexible, which has one or more braided metallic shields. Semi-flexible coaxial cable is used in the trunk and feeder distribution portion of cable television systems, and flexible cable (also known as drop cable) is used primarily for hookups from the feeder cable to the cable television subscriber’s residence. Flexible cable is also used in other communication applications. The Company has also developed a broad line of radio frequency and fiber optic interconnect components for full service cable television/ telecommunication networks.

The rapid development in fiber optic technologies, digital compression (which allows multiple channels to be transmitted within the same bandwidth that a single analog channel requires) and other communication technologies, including the Company’s development of higher capacity coaxial cable, have resulted in technologies that enable cable television systems to provide channel capacity in excess of 500 channels. Such expanded channel capacity, along with other component additions, permit cable operators to offer full service networks with a variety of capabilities including video-on-demand, pay-per-view special events, home shopping networks, interactive entertainment and education services, telephone services and high-speed Internet access. With respect to expanded channel capacity systems, cable operators have generally adopted, and the Company believes that for the foreseeable future will continue to adopt, network infrastructure using both fiber optic cable and coaxial cable. Such systems combine the advantages of fiber optic cable in transmitting clear signals over a long distance, with the advantages of coaxial cable in ease of installation, low cost and compatibility with the receiving components of the customer’s communication devices. The Company believes that while system operators are likely to increase their use of fiber optic cable for the trunk and feeder portions of the cable systems, there will be an ongoing need for high capacity coaxial cable for the local distribution and street-to-the-home portions of the cable system. In addition, U.S. cable system designs are increasingly being employed in international markets where cable television penetration is generally lower than in the U.S. The Company believes the development of full service cable television systems for the converging technologies of voice, video and data communications presents an opportunity to increase sales of its coaxial cable and related products.

The Company is also a leading producer of high speed data cables and specialty cables including flat-ribbon cable, a cable made of wires assembled side by side such that the finished cable is flat. Flat-ribbon cable is used to connect internal components in systems with space and component configuration limitations. The product is used in computer and office equipment applications as well as in a variety of telecommunication applications.

International Operations

The Company believes that its global presence is an important competitive advantage as it allows the Company to provide quality products on a timely and worldwide basis to its multinational customers. Approximately 57% of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 were outside the United States. Approximately 49% of such international sales were in Asia. The Company has manufacturing and assembly facilities in China, Taiwan, Korea, India, Japan and Malaysia. The balance of the Company’s international manufacturing and assembly facilities are located in Europe, Canada, Latin America, Africa and Australia. European operations include manufacturing and assembly facilities in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Estonia and sales offices in most European markets. The Company’s international manufacturing and assembly facilities generally serve the respective local markets and coordinate product design and manufacturing responsibility with the Company’s other operations around the world. The Company has low cost manufacturing and assembly facilities in China, Mexico, India, Eastern Europe and Africa to serve regional and world markets.

Customers

The Company’s products are used in a wide variety of applications by numerous customers, the largest of which accounted for approximately 7% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company sells its products to over 10,000 customer locations worldwide. The Company’s products are sold both directly to OEMs, contract manufacturers, cable system operators, telecommunication companies and through manufacturers’ representatives and distributors. There has been a trend on the part of OEM customers to consolidate their lists of qualified suppliers to companies that have a global presence, can meet quality and delivery standards, have a broad product portfolio and design capability, and have competitive prices. The Company has focused its

global resources to position itself to compete effectively in this environment. The Company has concentrated its efforts on service and productivity improvements including advanced computer aided design and manufacturing systems, statistical process controls and just-in-time inventory programs to increase product quality and shorten product delivery schedules. The Company’s strategy is to provide comprehensive design capabilities, a broad selection of products and a high level of service in the areas in which it competes. The Company has achieved a preferred supplier designation from many of its customers.

The Company’s sales to distributors represented approximately 15% of the Company’s 2006 sales. The Company’s recognized brand names, including “Amphenol,” “Times Fiber,” “Tuchel,” “Socapex,” “Sine,” “Spectra-Strip,” “Pyle-National,” “Matrix,” “Kai Jack” and others, together with the Company’s strong connector design-in position (products that are specified in customer drawings), enhance its ability to reach the secondary market through its network of distributors.

Manufacturing

The Company employs advanced manufacturing processes including molding, stamping, plating, turning, extruding, die casting and assembly operations as well as proprietary process technology for flat-ribbon and coaxial cable production. The Company’s manufacturing facilities are generally vertically integrated operations from the initial design stage through final design and manufacturing. Outsourcing of certain fabrication processes is used when cost-effective. Substantially all of the Company’s manufacturing facilities are certified to the ISO9000 series of quality standards.

The Company employs a global manufacturing strategy to lower its production costs and to improve service to customers. The Company sources its products on a worldwide basis with manufacturing and assembly operations in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia. To better serve high volume customers, the Company has established just-in-time facilities near major customers.

The Company’s policy is to maintain strong cost controls in its manufacturing and assembly operations. The Company is continually evaluating and adjusting its expense levels and workforce to reflect current business conditions and maximize the return on capital investments.

The Company purchases a wide variety of raw materials for the manufacture of its products, including precious metals such as gold and silver used in plating, aluminum, brass, steel, copper and bimetallic products used for cable, contacts and connector shells; and plastic materials used for cable and connector bodies and inserts. Such raw materials are generally available throughout the world and are purchased locally from a variety of suppliers. The Company is generally not dependent upon any one source for raw materials, or if one source is used the Company attempts to protect itself through long-term supply agreements.

Research and Development

The Company’s research and development expense for the creation of new and improved products and processes was $53.7 million, $40.1 million and $32.5 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company’s research and development activities focus on selected product areas and are performed by individual operating divisions. Generally, the operating divisions work closely with OEM customers to develop highly-engineered products and systems that meet specific customer needs. The Company focuses its research and development efforts primarily on those product areas that it believes have the potential for broad market applications and significant sales within a one-to-three year period.

Trademarks and Patents

The Company owns a number of active patents worldwide. The Company also regards its trademarks “Amphenol,” “Times Fiber,” “Tuchel,” “Socapex,” and “Spectra-Strip” to be of material value in its businesses. The Company has exclusive rights in all its major markets to use these registered trademarks. The Company has rights to other registered and unregistered trademarks which it believes to be of value to its businesses. While the Company considers its patents and trademarks to be valuable assets, the Company does not believe that its competitive position is dependent on patent or trademark protection or that its operations are dependent on any individual patent or trademark.

Competition

The Company encounters competition in substantially all areas of its business. The Company competes primarily on the basis of engineering, product quality, price, customer service and delivery time. Competitors include large, diversified companies, some of which have substantially greater assets and financial resources than the Company, as well as medium to small companies. In the area of coaxial cable for cable television, the Company believes that it and CommScope are the primary world providers of such cable; however, CommScope is larger than the Company in this market. In addition, the Company faces competition from other companies that have concentrated their efforts in one or more areas of the coaxial cable market.

Backlog

The Company estimates that its backlog of unfilled orders was $473 million and $397 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Orders typically fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on customer demand and general business conditions. Unfilled orders may be cancelled prior to shipment of goods. It is expected that all or a substantial portion of the backlog will be filled within the next 12 months. Significant elements of the Company’s business, such as sales to the communications related markets (including wireless communications, telecom & data communications and broadband communications) and sales to distributors, generally have short lead times. Therefore, backlog may not be indicative of future demand.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately 25,600 full-time employees worldwide of which approximately 16,400 were located in low cost regions. Of these employees, approximately 20,800 were hourly employees and the remainder were salaried. The Company believes that it has a good relationship with its unionized and non-unionized employees.

Environmental Matters

Certain operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations which govern the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, as well as the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company believes that its operations are currently in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations and that the costs of continuing compliance will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Subsequent to the acquisition of Amphenol from Allied Signal Corporation (“Allied Signal”) in 1987 (Allied Signal merged with Honeywell International Inc. in December 1999 (“Honeywell”)), Amphenol and Honeywell have been named jointly and severally liable as potentially responsible parties in relation to several environmental cleanup sites. Amphenol and Honeywell jointly consented to perform certain investigations and remedial and monitoring activities at two sites, the “Route 8” landfill and the “Sidney” landfill, and they were jointly ordered to perform work at another site, the “Richardson Hill Road” landfill. The costs incurred relating to these three sites are currently reimbursed by Honeywell based on an agreement (the “Honeywell Agreement”) entered into in connection with the acquisition in 1987. For sites covered by the Honeywell Agreement, to the extent that conditions or circumstances occurred or existed at the time of or prior to the acquisition, Honeywell is obligated to reimburse Amphenol 100% of such costs. Honeywell representatives continue to work closely with the Company in addressing the most significant environmental liabilities covered by the Honeywell Agreement. Management does not believe that the costs associated with resolution of these or any other environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. The environmental investigation, remedial and monitoring activities identified by the Company, including those referred to above, are covered under the Honeywell Agreement.

Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including expenditures for cleanup and monitoring costs and potential damages arising out of past disposal activities. Such liability in many cases may be imposed regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal activity. The Company has performed remediation activities and is currently performing operations and maintenance and monitoring activities at three off-site disposal sites previously utilized by the Company’s Sidney facility and others, to wit the Richardson Hill Road landfill, the Route 8 landfill and the Sidney landfill. Actions at the Richardson Hill Road and Sidney landfills were undertaken subsequent to designation as “Superfund” sites on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. The Route 8 landfill was designated as a New York State Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site, with remedial actions taken pursuant to Chapter 6, Section 375-1 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations. In addition, the Company is currently performing monitoring activities at, and in proximity to, its manufacturing site in Sidney, New York. The Company is also engaged in remediating

or monitoring environmental conditions at certain of its other manufacturing facilities and has been named as a potentially responsible party for cleanup costs at other off-site disposal sites. All such environmental matters referred to in this paragraph are covered by the Honeywell Agreement.

Since 1987, the Company has not been identified nor has it been named as a potentially responsible party with respect to any other significant on-site or off-site hazardous waste matters. In addition, the Company believes that all of its manufacturing activities and disposal practices since 1987 have been in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. Nonetheless, it is possible that the Company will be named as a potentially responsible party in the future with respect to additional Superfund or other sites. Although the Company is unable to predict with any reasonable certainty the extent of its ultimate liability with respect to any pending or future environmental matters, the Company believes, based upon all information currently known by management about the Company’s manufacturing activities, disposal practices and estimates of liability with respect to all known environmental matters, that any such liability will not be material to its financial condition or results of operations.

Other

The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available, without charge, on the Company’s web site, www.amphenol.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. Copies are also available without charge, from Amphenol Corporation, Investor Relations, 358 Hall Avenue, Wallingford, CT 06492.

Cautionary Statements for Purposes of Forward Looking Information

Statements made by the Company in written or oral form to various persons, including statements made in filings with the SEC, that are not strictly historical facts are “forward looking” statements. Such statements should be considered as subject to uncertainties that exist in the Company’s operations and business environment. The following includes some, but not all, of the factors or uncertainties that could cause the Company to fail to conform with expectations and predictions:

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investors should carefully consider the risks described below and all other information in this Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that it currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company’s business and operations.

If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

The Company is dependent on the communications industry, including telecommunication and data communication, wireless communications and broadband communications.

Approximately 61% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 came from sales to the communications industry, including telecommunication and data communication, wireless communications and broadband communications. Demand for these products is subject to rapid technological change (see below—”The Company is dependent on the acceptance of new product introductions for continued revenue growth”). These markets are dominated by several large manufacturers and operators who regularly exert significant price pressure on their suppliers, including the Company. While sales to the Company’s largest customer accounted for approximately 7% of consolidated sales in 2006, the loss of one or more of the large communications customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to compete successfully in the communications industry, and the Company’s failure to do so could impair the Company’s results of operations.

Approximately 11% of the Company’s 2006 revenues came from sales to the broadband communications industry. Demand for the Company’s broadband communications products depends primarily on capital spending by cable television operators for constructing, rebuilding or upgrading their systems. The amount of this capital spending, and, therefore, the Company’s sales and profitability will be affected by a variety of factors, including general economic conditions, acquisitions of cable television operators by non-cable television operators, cable system consolidation within the industry, the financial condition of domestic cable television operators and their access to financing, competition from satellite, telephone and television providers and telephone companies, technological developments and new legislation and regulation of cable television operators. There can be

no assurance that existing levels of cable television capital spending will continue or that cable television spending will not decrease.

Changes in defense expenditures may reduce the Company’s sales.

Approximately 18% of the Company’s 2006 revenues came from sales to the commercial aerospace and military market. The Company participates in a broad spectrum of defense programs and believes that no one program accounted for more than 1% of its 2006 revenues. The substantial majority of these sales are related to both U.S. and foreign military and defense programs. However, the Company’s sales are generally to contractors and subcontractors of the U.S. or foreign governments or to distributors that in turn sell to the contractors and subcontractors. Nevertheless, the Company’s sales are affected by changes in the defense budgets of the U.S. and foreign governments. The U.S. defense budget declined in real terms from 1986 to 1998. Beginning in 1999, the U.S. defense budget has been increasing and increased again in 2006. Nevertheless, a decline in U.S. defense expenditures and defense expenditures generally could adversely affect the Company’s business.

The Company encounters competition in substantially all areas of its business.

The Company competes primarily on the basis of engineering, product quality, price, customer service and delivery time. Competitors include large, diversified companies, some of which have substantially greater assets and financial resources than the Company, as well as medium to small companies. There can be no assurance that additional competitors will not enter the Company’s existing markets, nor can there be any assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully against existing or new competition.

The Company is dependent on the acceptance of new product introductions for continued revenue growth.

The Company estimates that products introduced in the last two years accounted for approximately 21% of 2006 net sales. The Company’s long-term results of operations depend substantially upon its ability to continue to conceive, design, source and market new products and upon continuing market acceptance of its existing and future product lines. In the ordinary course of business, the Company continually develops or creates new product line concepts. If the Company fails or is significantly delayed in introducing new product line concepts or if the Company’s new products do not meet with market acceptance, our results of operations may be impaired.

Covenants in the Company’s credit agreements may adversely affect the Company.

The Company’s bank credit agreements contain financial and other covenants, such as a limit on the ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, minimum levels of net worth, and limits on incurrence of liens. Although the Company believes none of these covenants are presently restrictive to the Company’s operations, the ability to meet the financial covenants can be affected by events beyond the Company’s control, and the Company cannot provide assurance that the Company will meet those tests. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Company’s credit agreements. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under any of the Company’s credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If the lenders accelerate the repayment of borrowings, the Company cannot provide assurance that it will have sufficient assets to repay the Company’s credit facilities and other indebtedness. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Downgrades of the Company’s debt rating could adversely affect the Company.

If the credit rating agencies that rate the Company’s debt were to downgrade the Company’s credit rating in conjunction with a deterioration of the Company’s performance it may increase the Company’s cost of capital and make it more difficult for the Company to obtain new financing.

The Company’s results may be negatively affected by changing interest rates.

The Company is subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on the Company’s financing activities. The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to manage and mitigate its exposure to changes in interest rates. At December 31, 2006, the Company had interest rate protection in the form of swaps that effectively fixed the Company’s LIBOR interest rate on $150.0 million, $250.0 million and $250.0 million of floating rate debt at 4.82%, 4.24% and 4.85%, expiring in December 2007, July 2008 and December 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s average LIBOR rate was 4.6%. A 10% change in the LIBOR interest rate at December 31, 2006 would not have materially increased or decreased interest

expense. The Company does not expect changes in interest rates to have a material effect on income or cash flows in 2007, although there can be no assurances that interest rates will not significantly change.

The Company’s results may be negatively affected by foreign currency exchange rates.

The Company conducts business in several international currencies through its worldwide operations, and as a result is subject to foreign exchange exposure due to changes in exchange rates of the various currencies. Changes in exchange rates can positively or negatively affect the Company’s sales, gross margins and retained earnings. The Company attempts to minimize currency exposure risk by producing its products in the same country or region in which the products are sold, thereby generating revenues and incurring expenses in the same currency and by managing its working capital. There can be no assurance that this approach will be successful, especially in the event of a significant and sudden decline in the value of any of the international currencies of the Company’s worldwide operations. The Company does not engage in purchasing forward exchange contracts for speculative purposes.

The Company’s operating results may be adversely affected by foreign operations.

International manufacturing and sales are subject to inherent risks, including changes in local economic or political conditions, the imposition of currency exchange restrictions, unexpected changes in regulatory environments, potentially adverse tax consequences and the exchange rate risk discussed above. There can be no assurance that these factors will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s production capabilities or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business and operating results.

The Company may experience difficulties and unanticipated expense, including the potential for the impairment of goodwill, of assimilating newly acquired businesses.

The Company has completed a number of acquisitions in the past few years. It is possible the Company may experience difficulty integrating such acquisitions and further that the acquisitions may not perform as expected. At December 31, 2006, the total assets on the Company’s balance sheet were $2,195.4 million, which included $926.2 million of goodwill. The goodwill arose as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired dating over the period 1987-2006. The Company performs annual evaluations for the potential impairment of the carrying value of goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142. Such evaluations have not resulted in the need to recognize an impairment. However, if the financial performance of the Company’s businesses were to decline significantly, the Company could incur a non-cash charge to its income statement for the impairment of goodwill.

The Company may experience difficulties in obtaining a consistent supply of materials at stable pricing levels.

The Company uses basic materials like steel, aluminum, copper, bi-metallic products, gold and plastic resins in its manufacturing process. Volatility in the prices of such material and availability of supply may have a substantial impact on the price the Company pays for such products. In addition, to the extent such cost increases cannot be recovered through sales price increases or productivity improvements, the Company’s margin may decline.

The Company may not be able to attract and retain key employees.

The Company’s continued success depends upon its continued ability to hire and retain key employees at its operations around the world. Any difficulties in obtaining or retaining the management and other human resource competencies that the Company needs to achieve its business objectives may have adverse affects on the Company’s performance.

Changes in general economic conditions and other factors beyond the Company’s control may adversely impact its business.

The following factors could adversely impact the Company’s business:

· A global economic slowdown in any one, or all, of the Company’s market segments.

· The effects of significant changes in monetary and fiscal policies in the U.S. and abroad including significant currency fluctuations and unforeseen inflationary pressures.

· Rapid material escalation of the cost of regulatory compliance and litigation.

· Unexpected government policies and regulations affecting the Company or its significant customers.

· Unforeseen intergovernmental conflicts or actions, including but not limited to armed conflict and trade wars.

· Unforeseen interruptions to the Company’s business with its largest customers, distributors and suppliers resulting from but not limited to, strikes, financial instabilities, computer malfunctions, inventory excesses or natural disasters.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

The Company’s fixed assets include certain plants and warehouses and a substantial quantity of machinery and equipment, most of which is general purpose machinery and equipment using tools and fixtures and in many instances having automatic control features and special adaptations. The Company’s plants, warehouses, machinery and equipment are in good operating condition, are well maintained, and substantially all of its facilities are in regular use. The Company considers the present level of fixed assets along with planned capital expenditures as suitable and adequate for operations in the current business environment. At December 31, 2006, the Company operated a total of 180 plants and warehouses of which (a) the locations in the U.S. had approximately 2.6 million square feet, of which 1.2 million square feet were leased; (b) the locations outside the U.S. had approximately 4.7 million square feet, of which 3.4 million square feet were leased; and (c) the square footage by segment was approximately 6.2 million square feet and 1.1 million square feet for interconnect products segment and cable products segment, respectively.

The Company believes that its facilities are suitable and adequate for the business conducted therein and are being appropriately utilized for their intended purposes. Utilization of the facilities varies based on demand for the products. The Company continuously reviews its anticipated requirements for facilities and, based on that review, may from time to time acquire or lease additional facilities and/or dispose of existing facilities.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in several legal actions in which various amounts are claimed arising from normal business activities. Although the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to such matters cannot be precisely determined, in the opinion of management, such matters are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the last quarter of the year ended December 31, 2006.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On January 21, 2004, the Company announced a 2-for-1 stock split that was effective for stockholders of record as of March 17, 2004. The additional shares were distributed on March 29, 2004. The share information included herein reflects the effect of such stock split.

On January 17, 2007, the Company announced a 2-for-1 stock split that will be effective for stockholders of record as of March 16, 2007 and these additional shares are expected to be distributed on or about March 30, 2007. The share information included herein does not reflect the effect of such stock split. Had this stock split occurred at December 31, 2006, total authorized shares of Common Stock would have been 400,000,000, total shares outstanding would have been 178,265,978 and net income per share on a diluted basis would have been $1.39.

The Company effected the initial public offering of its Class A Common Stock in November 1991. The Company’s common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since that time under the symbol “APH.” The following table sets forth on a per share basis the high and low prices for the common stock for both 2006 and 2005 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

	2006				2005
	High		Low		High		Low

First Quarter	$	52.50	$	43.88	$	41.94	$	33.24
Second Quarter	61.62		49.33		43.20		35.79
Third Quarter	64.39		50.30		46.20		36.57
Fourth Quarter	70.49		60.88		45.12		38.38

As of January 31, 2007, there were 44 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. A significant number of outstanding shares of common stock are registered in the name of only one holder, which is a nominee of The Depository Trust Company, a securities depository for banks and brokerage firms. The Company believes that there are a significant number of beneficial owners of its common stock.

On January 19, 2005, the Company announced that it would commence payment of a quarterly dividend on its common stock of $.03 per share. Cumulative dividends declared during 2006 were $10.7 million of which $8.0 million were paid in 2006. Total dividends paid in 2006 were $10.7 million including those declared in 2005 and paid in 2006. The Company intends to retain the remainder of its earnings not used for dividend payments to provide funds for the operation and expansion of the Company’s business, repurchase shares of its common stock and to repay outstanding indebtedness.

The following table summarizes the Company’s equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2006:

	Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	6,457,713	$	30.21	3,857,930
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	—	—		—
Total	6,457,713	$	30.21	3,857,930

Purchases of Equity Securities

On October 20, 2004, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized an open-market stock repurchase program (the “Program”) of up to 5.0 million shares (on a post-split basis) of its common stock during the period ended September 30, 2006 which was extended to December 31, 2008 by an amendment on July 27, 2006. At December 31, 2006, approximately 2.1 million shares of Common Stock remained available for repurchase under the Program. In September 2006, the Company retired 2.3 million shares of its common stock purchased for $87.8 million under the Program by reducing retained earnings by this amount.

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1, to January 31, 2006	—	$	—	1,673,100	3,326,900
February 1, to February 28, 2006	—	—		1,673,100	3,326,900
March 1, to March 31, 2006	—	—		1,673,100	3,326,900
April 1, to April 30, 2006	—	—		1,673,100	3,326,900
May 1, to May 31, 2006	187,400	55.90		1,860,500	3,139,500
June 1, to June 30, 2006	181,100	53.78		2,041,600	2,958,400
July 1, to July 31, 2006	—	—		2,041,600	2,958,400
August 1, to August 31, 2006	—	—		2,041,600	2,958,400
September 1, to September 30, 2006	229,100	57.73		2,270,700	2,729,300
October 1, 2006 to October 31, 2006	—	—		2,270,700	2,729,300
November 1, 2006 to November 30, 2006	119,900	65.02		2,390,600	2,609,400
December 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006	483,000	65.05		2,873,600	2,126,400
Total	1,200,500	$	60.52	2,873,600	2,126,400

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005		2004		2003			2002

*Operations*
Net sales	$	2,471,430		$	1,808,147	$	1,530,446	$	1,239,504		$	1,062,002
Net income	255,691(		2)	206,339		163,311		103,990(		1)	80,344
Net income per common share—Diluted	2.79(		2)	2.28		1.82		1.18(		1)	0.93
*Financial Position*
Working capital	$	486,946		$	373,884	$	253,443	$	233,707		$	153,250
Total assets	2,195,397			1,932,540		1,306,711		1,181,384			1,078,908
Long-term debt, including current portion	680,414			781,000		449,053		542,959			644,248
Shareholders’ equity	902,994			689,235		481,604		323,406			166,982
Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted	91,673,663			90,471,737		89,736,656		88,131,720			86,891,200
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.12		$	0.12	—		—			—

(1) Includes a one-time charge for expenses incurred in the early extinguishment of debt of $10,367, less tax benefit of $3,525, or $0.08 per share after taxes.

(2) Includes a one-time charge for expense incurred in connection with a flood at the Company’s Sidney, NY facility of $20,747, less tax benefit of $6,535, or $0.15 per share after taxes.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this document.

Executive Overview

The Company is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of interconnect and cable products. In 2006 approximately 57% of the Company’s sales were outside the U.S. The primary end markets for our products are:

· communication systems for the converging technologies of voice, video and data communications;

· a broad range of industrial applications including factory automation and motion control systems, medical and industrial instrumentation, mass transportation, natural resource exploration and automotive applications; and

· commercial aerospace and military applications.

The Company’s products are used in a wide variety of applications by numerous customers, the largest of which accounted for approximately 7% of net sales in 2006. The Company encounters competition in all of its markets and competes primarily on the basis of engineering, product quality, price, customer service and delivery time. There has been a trend on the part of OEM customers to consolidate their lists of qualified suppliers to companies that have a global presence, can meet quality and delivery standards, have a broad product portfolio and design capability, and have competitive prices. The Company has focused its global resources to position itself to compete effectively in this environment. The Company believes that its global presence is an important competitive advantage as it allows the Company to provide quality products on a timely and worldwide basis to its multinational customers.

The Company’s strategy is to provide comprehensive design capabilities, a broad selection of products and a high level of service in the areas in which it competes. The Company focuses its research and development efforts through close collaboration with its OEM customers to develop highly-engineered products that meet customer needs and have the potential for broad market applications and significant sales within a one-to-three year period. The Company is also focused on controlling costs. The Company does this by investing in modern manufacturing technologies, controlling purchasing processes and expanding into low cost areas.

The Company’s strategic objective is to further enhance its position in its served markets by pursuing the following success factors:

· Focus on customer needs

· Design and develop application-specific interconnect solutions

· Establish a strong global presence in resources and capabilities

· Preserve and foster a collaborative, entrepreneurial management structure

· Maintain a culture of controlling costs

· Pursue strategic acquisitions

For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company reported net sales, operating income and net income of $2,471.4 million, $424.6 million and $255.7 million, respectively; up 37%, 24% and 24%, respectively, from 2005. Sales of interconnect products and assemblies and sales of cable products increased in the majority of the Company’s related major markets and geographic regions. Sales and profitability trends are discussed in detail in “Results of Operations” below. In addition, a strength of the Company is its ability to consistently generate cash. The Company uses cash generated from operations to fund capital expenditures and acquisitions, repurchase shares of its common stock, pay dividends and reduce indebtedness. In 2006, the Company generated operating cash flow of $289.6 million.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the components of net income as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004
Net sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of sales	68.1		66.9		67.6
Selling, general and administrative expense	13.9		14.2		14.3
Casualty loss related to flood	.8		—		—
Operating income	17.2		18.9		18.1
Interest expense	(1.6	)	(1.3	)	(1.5	)
Other expenses, net	(.5	)	(.5	)	(.4	)
Expense for early extinguishment of debt	—		(.1	)	—
Income before income taxes	15.1		17.0		16.2
Provision for income taxes	(4.8	)	(5.6	)	(5.5	)
Net income	10.3	%	11.4	%	10.7	%

2006 Compared to 2005

Net sales were $2,471.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $1,808.1 million for 2005, an increase of 37% in U.S. dollars and 36% in local currencies. The increase in sales over 2005 excluding acquisitions was 12% in U.S. dollars and 11% in local currencies. Sales of interconnect products and assemblies (approximately 90% of net sales) increased 39% in U.S. dollars and 38% in local currencies compared to 2005 ($2,207.5 million in 2006 versus $1,592.4 million in 2005). Sales increased in the Company’s major end markets including telecommunications and data communications, mobile communications, industrial and military/aerospace markets. Sales to the telecommunications and data communications related markets increased approximately $338.8 million reflecting the impact of the acquisition of TCS in December 2005 (Note 7) and increased sales of new high speed interconnect products for servers and other data center equipment applications. The increase in sales in the mobile communications markets (approximately $209.0 million) is attributable primarily to increased sales to the mobile device market relating to new products, the impact of the acquisition of TCS in December 2005 and to a lesser extent to increased demand in the wireless infrastructure market from cell site installation customers. The increase in sales in the industrial market (approximately $55.8 million) reflects increased sales in North America and Europe relating to products for the factory automation, medical and oil/geophysical markets and the impact of acquisitions. The increase in military/aerospace sales (approximately $15.4 million) relates to increased demand on commercial aircraft and military programs. Sales in the military/aerospace market were adversely impacted by approximately $25.0 million in 2006 due to business interruption related to the flood at the Company’s Sidney, New York facility further described below. Automotive sales declined approximately $8.1 million primarily as a result of a reduction in vehicle production rates by European and U.S. vehicle manufacturers. Sales of cable products (approximately 10% of net sales) increased 22% compared to 2005 ($263.9 million in 2006 versus $215.7 million in 2005). Such increase is primarily due to increased sales in broadband cable television markets and the impact of price increases.

Geographically, sales in the U.S. in 2006 increased approximately 32% compared to 2005 ($1,060.0 million in 2006 versus $802.4 million in 2005); international sales for 2006 increased approximately 40% in U.S. dollars ($1,411.5 million in 2006 versus $1,005.8 million in 2005) and increased approximately 39% in local currency compared to 2005. The comparatively weak U.S. dollar in 2006 had the effect of increasing net sales by approximately $16.5 million when compared to foreign currency translation rates in 2005.

The gross profit margin as a percentage of net sales decreased to 32% in 2006 compared to 33% in 2005 due primarily to a decrease in margins in the interconnect products and assemblies segment primarily as a result of the TCS acquisition (Note 7). The operating margin for interconnect products and assemblies decreased approximately 1% compared to the prior year. TCS margins are lower than the average margin of the Company and its inclusion in the consolidated results lowered the margin percentage. Interconnect segment margins excluding the impact of TCS were consistent with the prior year margins as the continuing development of new higher margin, application specific products, excellent operating leverage on incremental volume and aggressive programs of cost control, offset increases resulting primarily from higher material costs. In addition, cable operating margins decreased 0.3% reflecting higher material and freight costs in 2006 driven by higher commodity and energy prices offset, in part, by the impact of price increases.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $342.8 million and $257.1 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively, or approximately 14% of sales in each year. The increase in expense in 2006 is attributable to the impact of acquisitions and increases in the major components of selling, general and administrative expenses as follows. Research and development expenditures increased approximately $13.6 million, reflecting increases in expenditures for new product development and represented approximately 2% of sales for both 2006 and 2005. Selling and marketing expenses remained approximately 7% of sales. Shipping expense, which relates primarily to sales of cable products to the broadband market, increased proportionately with sales for those products. Administrative expenses increased by approximately $34.2 million, due primarily to increases in costs as a result of the TCS acquisition and stock-based compensation expense of $9.7 million, as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment,” which was effective on January 1, 2006, in addition to general cost increases relating to professional fees, pensions and employee-related benefits.

The Company incurred damage at its Sidney, New York manufacturing facility as a result of severe and sudden flooding during the second quarter of 2006. In 2006, the Company recorded charges of $20.7 million, or $.15 per share, for recovery and clean up expenses and property related damage, net of insurance and grant recoveries. The Sidney facility had limited manufacturing and sales activity for the period from June 28 to July 14. Production activity was substantially back to full production at the end of the third quarter. As a result, sales in 2006 were reduced by approximately $25.0 million.

Interest expense was $38.8 million for 2006 compared to $24.1 million for 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to higher interest rates and higher average debt levels related to the TCS acquisition (Note 7).

Expenses for early extinguishment of debt totaling $2.4 million in 2005, relate to the refinancing of the Company’s senior credit facilities. Such one-time expenses included the write off of deferred debt issuance costs of $5.7 million partially offset by the settlement of interest rate swap agreements of $3.2 million. No such expenses were incurred in 2006.

Other expenses, net, for 2006 and 2005 were $12.5 million and $8.9 million, respectively. Other expenses, net, are comprised primarily of minority interests ($6.0 million in 2006 and $4.1 million in 2005), program fees on the sale of accounts receivable ($5.0 million in 2006 and $3.8 million in 2005), reflecting higher receivable fee rates in 2006 and agency and commitment fees on the Company’s credit facilities ($2.1 million in 2006 and $1.5 million in 2005) primarily due to higher commitment fees offset by interest income ($0.7 million in 2006 and $0.4 million in 2005). See Note 11 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the components of other expenses, net.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. This pronouncement amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of SFAS No. 123”, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that companies account for awards of equity instruments under the fair value method of accounting and recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method and, in connection therewith compensation expense is recognized in its consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2006 over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. The Company recognizes expense for all stock-based compensation with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire award. Stock-based compensation expense includes the estimated effects of forfeitures, and estimates of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of expense to be recognized in future periods. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company recorded stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25. The Company estimated the fair value of stock option awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and disclosed the resulting estimated compensation effect on net income on a pro forma basis. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 the Company’s income before income taxes and net income was reduced by $9.7 million and $6.7 million, respectively, or $.07 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The provision for income taxes was at an effective rate of 31.5% in 2006 and 33% in 2005. The lower effective tax rate results primarily from an increase in income in lower tax jurisdictions and changes in the Company’s income repatriation plans. The total effective rate reduction lowered tax expense in 2006 by approximately $5.6 million or $.06 per share.

2005 Compared to 2004

Net sales were $1,808.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $1,530.4 million for 2004 an increase of 18% in both U.S. dollars and local currencies. The increase in sales over 2004 excluding acquisitions was 8% in both U.S. dollars and local currencies. Sales of interconnect products and assemblies increased 19% in U.S. dollars and local currencies compared to 2004 ($1,592.4 million in 2005 versus $1,333.8 million in 2004). Sales increased in all major geographic regions as a result of the continuing development of new application specific and value added products, economic improvement in some of the Company’s major end markets and the impact of acquisitions. Sales increased in the Company’s major end markets including mobile communications, military/aerospace, industrial, automotive, and computer/data communications markets. The increase in sales in the mobile communications markets (approximately $92.7 million) is attributable to increased demand for wireless infrastructure products for cell site installations in North America, increased demand on mobile handset products in Asia and the impact of acquisitions. The increase in sales in the industrial market (approximately $24.1 million) reflects increased sales in North America and Europe and the impact of acquisitions. Automotive sales increased approximately $33.7 million primarily in Europe, reflecting the impact of an acquisition late 2004. The increase in military/aerospace sales (approximately $57.8 million) relates to increased demand on military programs, avionics applications in North America and the impact of acquisitions. Sales to the computer and data communications related markets increased approximately $45.8 million reflecting the impact of acquisitions and increased sales in Asia for disk drive and storage applications. Sales of cable products increased 10% compared to 2004 ($215.7 million in 2005 versus $196.6 million in 2004). Such increase is primarily due to increased sales in broadband cable television markets and the impact of price increases.

Geographically, sales in the U.S. in 2005 increased approximately 19% compared to 2004 ($802.4 million in 2005 versus $674.3 million in 2004); international sales for 2005 increased approximately 18% in U.S. dollars ($1,005.8 million in 2005 versus

$856.1 million in 2004) and increased approximately 17% in local currency compared to 2004. The comparatively weak U.S. dollar in 2005 had the currency effect of increasing net sales by approximately $7.0 million when compared to foreign currency translation rates in 2004.

The gross profit margin as a percentage of net sales (including depreciation in cost of sales) increased to 33% in 2005 compared to 32% in 2004. An increase in margins in the interconnect products and assemblies segment was partially offset by a decline in margins in the cable segment. The operating margin for interconnect products and assemblies increased approximately 1% compared to the prior year. The increase is generally attributable to the continuing development of new higher margin application specific products, excellent operating leverage on incremental volume and aggressive programs of cost control. The decrease in cable margins was due to the impact of a continued increase in material costs which was not fully offset by price increases implemented during the year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $257.1 million and $218.8 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, approximately 14.0% of sales. Research and development expenditures increased approximately $7.6 million, commensurate with sales, reflecting increases in expenditures for new product development and represented approximately 2% of sales for both 2005 and 2004. Selling and marketing expenses remained approximately 7% of sales. Shipping expense, which relates primarily to sales of cable products to the broadband market, increased commensurate with sales for those products. Administrative expenses increased by approximately $8.4 million, due primarily to increases in costs relating to insurance, pensions and medical benefits.

Interest expense was $24.1 million for 2005 compared to $22.5 million for 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to higher interest rates partially offset by the effect of the refinancing completed in the third quarter of 2005 (see Liquidity and Capital Resources) and higher average debt levels.

Expenses for early extinguishment of debt totaling $2.4 million in 2005, relate to the refinancing of the Company’s senior credit facilities. Such one-time expenses include the write off of deferred debt issuance costs of $5.7 million partially offset by the settlement of interest rate swap agreements of $3.2 million.

Other expenses, net, for 2005 and 2004 were $8.9 million and $6.7 million, respectively. Other expenses, net, are comprised primarily of foreign currency transaction gains (losses) ($0.4 million in 2005 and $(0.6) million in 2004), reflecting the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar in 2004, program fees on the sale of accounts receivable ($3.8 million in 2005 and $2.3 million in 2004), reflecting higher receivable fee rates in 2005, minority interests ($4.1 million in 2005 and $3.0 million in 2004) and agency and commitment fees on the Company’s credit facilities ($1.5 million in 2005 and $1.0 million in 2004) primarily due to higher commitment fees. See Note 10 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the components of other expenses, net.

The provision for income taxes was at an effective rate of 33.0% in 2005 and 34% in 2004. The reduction in the tax rate in 2005 relates primarily to lower U.S. income taxes resulting from the impact of the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash provided by operating activities totaled $289.6 million, $229.6 million and $208.3 million for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operating cash flow includes $nil, $5.0 million and $6.2 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, resulting from an increase in sale of receivables under the Company’s receivable securitization program. The increase in cash from operating activities in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to an increase in net income and an increase in depreciation and amortization partially offset by a higher increase in the non-cash components of working capital compared to the increase in 2005. The increase in cash from operating activities in 2005 compared to 2004 is also primarily attributable to an increase in net income and an increase in depreciation and amortization partially offset by an increase in the non-cash components of working capital compared to a decrease in 2004.

The non-cash components of working capital increased $69.4 million in 2006 due primarily to increases in accounts receivable of $60.6 million, $81.9 million in inventory, $19.0 million in prepaid expenses and other assets and a decrease in accrued interest of $1.1 million partially offset by a $46.4 million increase in accounts payable and an increase of $46.8 million in accrued liabilities.

The non-cash components of working capital increased $36.7 million in 2005 due primarily to an increase in accounts receivable of $45.2 million and $20.6 million in inventory partially offset by a $25.8 million increase in accounts payable, a decrease of $10.4 million in accrued liabilities, an increase of $5.0 million of receivables sold, an increase in accrued interest of $3.0 million, and a decrease of $5.6 million in prepaid expenses and other assets.

The non-cash components of working capital decreased $14.1 million in 2004 due primarily to a $3.2 million increase in accounts payable, an increase of $15.7 million in accrued liabilities, an increase of $6.2 million in receivables sold and an increase of $28.5 million related to accrued income taxes, partially offset by a $26.0 million increase in accounts receivable due to higher sales levels and an operating addition of $14.5 million in inventory.

In 2006, accounts receivable increased $81.0 million to $383.9 million, due to an increase in sales levels, $16.0 million due to translation resulting from the comparatively weaker U.S. dollar at December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2005 (“translation”) and $4.1 million from acquired companies. Days sales outstanding increased to approximately 66 days from 65 days in 2005. Inventory increased $90.6 million to $416.5 million, primarily due to an operating addition of $60.5 million, $13.3 million due to a new inventory hubbing arrangement with certain customers, $12.8 million due to translation and $4.0 million in inventory from acquired companies. Inventory days at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were 86 and 87, respectively. Goodwill and acquired intangible assets increased $34.8 million to $968.9 million primarily as a result of acquisitions completed during the year in addition to adjustments made for prior acquisitions. Land and depreciable assets, net, increased $20.3 million to $274.1 million reflecting capital expenditures of $82.4 million, $9.8 million due to translation, assets from acquisitions of approximately $3.0 million offset by depreciation of $67.0 million and disposals of $8.0 million. Accounts payable and accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits increased $57.6 million and $10.5 million to $234.9 million and $53.2 million, respectively, due to an increase in sales levels, liabilities assumed from acquired companies and a $7.4 million and $1.8 million increase, respectively, due to translation. Other accrued liabilities increased $55.5 million to $156.4 million relating primarily an increase of $21.6 million in liabilities associated with performance-based additional cash consideration on acquisitions, an increase in accrued income taxes of $17.9 million, the recording of $10.9 million in deferred revenue related to the new inventory hubbing arrangements discussed above, accruals relating to higher sales volume as well as a $4.1 million increase due to translation. Accrued pension and post employment benefit obligations increased $29.5 million to $138.3 million primarily as a result of an increase of $21.1 million relating to the implementation of Statement No. 158 (“SFAS”) “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”, as further discussed below, and the impact of translation.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 158 whichrequires employers to fully recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet. The pension asset or liability under SFAS 158 is equal to the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and its projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans. Prior guidance required the liability to be measured as the accumulated benefit obligation. In addition, this statement requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end balance sheet, with limited exceptions. SFAS 158 also requires entities to disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The statement is effective for years ending after December 15, 2006 except for the requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end balance sheet which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. SFAS 158 had the effect of increasing the Company’s accrued benefit obligation

(including the elimination of the intangible asset of $10.0 million at December 31, 2005) and other comprehensive income, net of deferred tax assets, by approximately $31.1 million and $19.2 million, respectively at December 31, 2006 and did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of income.

In 2006, cash from operating activities of $289.6 million, proceeds from disposal of fixed assets of $5.9 million and proceeds from the exercise of stock options including excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements of $31.9 million were used to fund capital expenditures of $82.4 million, acquisitions of $22.5 million, dividend payments of $10.7 million, a net debt reduction of $102.6 million, purchases of treasury stock of $72.7 million, payment of fees and expenses related to refinancing of $1.1 million and an increase in cash on hand of $35.5 million. For 2005, cash from operating activities of $229.6 million (including additional sales of receivables of $5.0 million) and proceeds from exercise of stock options and related tax benefits of $36.4 million and net borrowings under the Company’s bank agreements of $331.1 million were used primarily to fund capital expenditures of $57.1 million, payment of dividends of $8.0 million, acquisitions of $512.3 million, the purchase of treasury stock of $8.7 million, and an increase in cash on hand of $8.5 million.

On July 15, 2005, the Company completed a refinancing of its senior secured credit facility. The new bank agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) was comprised of a five-year $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility that was originally scheduled to expire in July 2010, of which approximately $440 million was drawn at closing. The net proceeds from the refinancing were used to repay all amounts outstanding under the Company’s previous senior credit facility and for working capital purposes. On November 15, 2005, the Company exercised its option to increase its aggregate commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility by an additional $250 million thereby increasing the revolving credit facility to $1 billion from $750 million. In December 2005, the TCS acquisition was funded with borrowings under the revolving credit facility. On August 1, 2006, the Company amended the Revolving Credit Facility to reduce borrowing costs and increase the general indebtedness basket by $250 million through an accordion feature similar to that exercised on November 15, 2005. In addition, the term of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended from July 2010 to August 2011.

At December 31, 2006, availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $335.0 million, after a reduction of $12.3 million for outstanding letters of credit. In connection with the 2005 refinancing, the Company incurred one-time expenses for the early extinguishment of debt of $2.4 million (less tax effects of $0.8 million) or $.02 per share after tax. Such one-time expenses include the write-off of unamortized deferred debt issuance costs less the gain on the termination of related interest rate swap agreements. The Company’s interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 50 basis points. The Company also pays certain annual agency and facility fees. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s was BBB- and from Moody’s was Ba1. The Revolving Credit Facility requires that the Company satisfy certain financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA divided by interest expense) of higher than 3X and a leverage ratio (Debt divided by EBITDA) lower than 3.50X. At December 31, 2006, such ratios as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility were 11.53X and 1.47X, respectively. The Revolving Credit Facility also includes limitations with respect to, among other things, (i) indebtedness in excess of $50.0 million for capital leases, $450.0 million for general indebtedness, $200.0 million for acquisition indebtedness, (of which approximately $6.6 million, $2.4 million and $nil were outstanding at December 31, 2006, respectively), (ii) restricted payments including dividends on the Company’s Common Stock in excess of 50% of consolidated cumulative net income subsequent to July 15, 2005 plus $250.0 million, or approximately $429.1 million at December 31, 2006, (iii) required consolidated net worth equal to 50% of cumulative consolidated net income commencing April 1, 2005 plus 100% of net cash proceeds from equity issuances commencing April 1, 2005, plus $400.0 million, or approximately $607.8 million at December 31, 2006, (iv) creating or incurring liens, (v) making other investments, and (vi) acquiring or disposing of assets.

In conjunction with the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that fixed the Company’s LIBOR interest rate on $150.0 million, $250.0 million and $250.0 million of floating rate bank debt at 4.82%, 4.24% and 4.85%, expiring in December 2007, July 2008 and December 2008, respectively. The fair value of such agreements was estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers which represented the amounts that the Company would receive or pay if the agreements were terminated. The fair value indicated that termination of the agreements at December 31, 2006 would have resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4.9 million; such gain, net of tax of $1.9 million, was recorded in other comprehensive income.

The Company’s primary ongoing cash requirements will be for operating and capital expenditures, product development activities, repurchase of its common stock, dividends and debt service. The Company may also use cash to fund all or part of the cost of future acquisitions. The Company’s debt service requirements consist primarily of principal and interest on bank borrowings. The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are internally generated cash flow, the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility and the sale of receivables under the Company’s accounts receivable agreement. The Company expects that ongoing requirements for operating and capital expenditures, product development activities, repurchases of its common stock, dividends and debt service requirements will be funded from these sources; however, the Company’s sources of liquidity could be adversely affected by, among other things, a

decrease in demand for the Company’s products, a deterioration in certain of the Company’s financial ratios or a deterioration in the quality of the Company’s accounts receivable.

The Company expects that capital expenditures in 2007 will be approximately $90.0 to $95.0 million. The Company may also use cash to fund part or all of the cost of future acquisitions. On January 19, 2005, the Company announced that it would commence payment of quarterly dividends on its common stock of $.03 per share. The Company paid its fourth 2006 quarterly dividend in the amount of $2.7 million or $.03 per share on January 3, 2007 to shareholders of record as of December 13, 2006. Cumulative dividends declared during 2006 were $10.7 million of which $8.0 million were paid in 2006. Total dividends paid in 2006 were $10.7 million including those declared in 2005 and paid in 2006. The Company intends to retain the remainder of its earnings to provide funds for the operation and expansion of the Company’s business, repurchase of its common stock and to repay outstanding indebtedness. Management believes that the Company’s working capital position, ability to generate strong cash flow from operations, availability under its Revolving Credit Agreement and access to credit markets will allow it to meet its obligations for the next twelve months and the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement - Accounts Receivable Securitization

A subsidiary of the Company has an agreement with a financial institution whereby the subsidiary can sell an undivided interest of up to $100.0 million in a designated pool of qualified accounts receivable. The Company services, administers and collects the receivables on behalf of the purchaser. On July 31, 2006, the Company terminated its then existing accounts receivable securitization facility and entered into a new Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “New Agreement”). The New Agreement allows the Company to sell an undivided interest of up to $100.0 million in a designated pool of qualified accounts receivable at costs that are lower than the previous agreement. The remaining terms and conditions of the New Agreement remained substantially the same as the previous facility. The New Agreement includes certain covenants and provides for various events of termination and expires in July 2009. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, approximately $85.0 million of receivables were sold under the previous agreement and the New Agreement, respectively, and are therefore not reflected in the accounts receivable balance in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

TCS Acquisition

On December 1, 2005, pursuant to an Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 10, 2005 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among Amphenol Corporation (the “Company”) and Teradyne, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“Teradyne”), The Company purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of Teradyne’s backplane and connection systems business segment (“TCS”), including the stock of certain of its operating subsidiaries for a total purchase price of approximately $384.7 million in cash. In addition, Amphenol incurred approximately $8.8 million of transaction related expenses. The accompanying Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2005 includes the results of TCS for the period subsequent to the acquisition date; sales of approximately $34.0 million and minimal net income resulting in no impact to 2005 consolidated net earnings per share. TCS results are reflected for the full year 2006.

TCS is headquartered in Nashua, New Hampshire and is a leading supplier of high-speed, high-density, printed circuit board interconnect products. TCS sells its products primarily to the data communications, storage and server markets, wireless infrastructure markets and industrial markets. TCS had sales of $373 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated first to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and then to the liabilities of TCS based upon their fair market values. The excess purchase price over the fair market value of the underlying net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill.

In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $240.0 million of goodwill and $46.2 million of acquired intangible assets of which $30.7 million, $9.5 million and $6.0 million was assigned to proprietary technology, customer relationships and license agreements, respectively, all of which are subject to amortization. The acquired intangible assets have a total weighted-average useful life of approximately 12 years. The license agreements, proprietary technology and customer relationships have a weighted average useful life of 8 years, 15 years and 5 years, respectively. The entire amount of goodwill was assigned to the interconnect segment all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information assuming that the TCS acquisition actually occurred as of the beginning of the period presented. On a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2005, TCS had sales and operating income of $373.0 million and $6.7 million, respectively. Such amounts along with $22.2 million of additional pro forma interest expense and related bank fees on borrowings to fund the acquisition are reflected in the pro forma amounts shown below. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and reflect a reasonable estimate of the effects of the TCS acquisition for the periods presented on the basis set forth herein. The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what the Company’s financial position or results of operations would have been had the TCS acquisition in fact occurred on the dates assumed, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods.

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004
	(in thousands except per share data)
Net sales	$	2,146,286	$	1,940,834
Operating income	347,301		304,451
Net income	195,675		166,746

Net income per common share - Basic	$	2.21	$	1.89
Net income per common share - Diluted	2.16		1.86

To supplement the Company’s pro forma combined financial information presented above, the Company uses certain measures which are adjusted from the Company’s pro forma GAAP amounts based upon actions taken either on the purchase date or known subsequent changes in cost structure, the results of which are as shown below. These adjustments are provided to enhance the user’s overall understanding of the Company’s current and expected financial performance and are “forward looking”. The adjustments are presented for informational purposes only and do not purport to represent what the Company’s financial position or results of operations would have been had the TCS acquisition in fact occurred on the dates assumed, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods. Such information should be considered as subject to uncertainties that exist in the Company’s operations and business environment. The following table sets forth cash savings that are expected to be achieved as of or immediately following the acquisition date as well as the reversal of non recurring restructuring costs and non recurring gains on the sale of a business, which management does not expect to recur in the future. This information is included to assist investors and management in assessing the Company’s operating results in a manner that is focused on the performance of the Company’s ongoing combined operations.

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2005			2004
	(in thousands)
Benefit of reduction in employee related benefits (i)	$	1,969		$	3,430
Benefit of reduction in Teradyne historical corporate allocations (ii)	7,505			8,000
Reversal of nonrecurring restructuring costs (iii)	11,654			4,148
Reversal of nonrecurring gains on the sale of a business (iv)	(612		)	(865		)
Total	$	20,516		$	14,713

(i) In conjunction with the acquisition, TCS’s historical management incentive plan was terminated and replaced by an incentive plan which has higher profitability targets. These targets would not have been achieved at TCS’s historic profitability levels and, as such, the related expense would not have been incurred.

(ii) Teradyne had historically allocated corporate general and administrative costs to TCS which are included in the pro forma amounts presented above. Such costs included information technology, human resources, tax, legal, corporate treasury and finance as well as executive administration related items. The acquisition agreement included the hiring of certain Teradyne employees and assumption of certain agreements that related to services performed by Teradyne for TCS. In addition, Amphenol assumed the performance of certain tax and treasury functions for TCS. This adjustment represents the excess of the amount charged to TCS by Teradyne for those centralized services over the actual cost incurred by TCS and Amphenol since the acquisition.

(iii) Teradyne had significant restructuring activities in 2004 and 2005 at TCS resulting in related expenses which are included in the pro forma amounts presented above. No significant restructuring activities are expected to take place in the future, and as such, these costs are considered nonrecurring, and are therefore included above as expected savings.

(iv) TCS had recognized gains on the sale of a business in 2004 and 2005 which are included in the pro forma amounts presented above. These gains are not expected to occur in the future.

Environmental Matters

Subsequent to the acquisition of Amphenol from Allied Signal Corporation in 1987 (Allied Signal merged with Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell) in December 1999), Amphenol and Honeywell have been named jointly and severally liable as potentially responsible parties in relation to several environmental cleanup sites. Amphenol and Honeywell have jointly consented to perform certain investigations and remedial and monitoring activities at two sites and they have been jointly ordered to perform work at another site. The costs incurred relating to these three sites are currently reimbursed by Honeywell based on an agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition in 1987. For sites covered by this agreement, to the extent that conditions or circumstances occurred or existed at the time of or prior to the acquisition, Honeywell is obligated to reimburse Amphenol 100% of such costs. Honeywell representatives work closely with the Company in addressing the most significant environmental liabilities covered by the Agreement. Management does not believe that the costs associated with resolution of these or any other environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. The environmental investigation, remedial and monitoring activities identified by the Company, including those referred to above, are covered under the Honeywell Agreement.

Inflation and Costs

The cost of the Company’s products is influenced by the cost of a wide variety of raw materials, including precious metals such as gold and silver used in plating; aluminum, copper, brass and steel used for contacts, shells and cable; and plastic materials used in molding connector bodies, inserts and cable. In general, increases in the cost of raw materials, labor and services have been offset by price increases, productivity improvements and cost saving programs.

Risk Management

The Company has to a significant degree mitigated its exposure to currency risk in its business operations by manufacturing and procuring its products in the same country or region in which the products are sold so that costs reflect local economic conditions. In other cases involving U.S. export sales, raw materials are a significant component of product costs for the majority of such sales and raw material costs are generally dollar based on a worldwide scale, such as basic metals and petroleum-derived materials.

Stock Split

On January 21, 2004, the Company announced a 2-for-1 stock split that was effective for shareholders of record as of March 17, 2004. The additional shares were distributed on March 29, 2004. The share information included herein has been restated to reflect the effect of such stock split.

Recent Accounting Changes

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of SFAS 157 but does not believe it will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No.109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” and provides guidance on classification and disclosure requirements for tax contingencies. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2007. Although the Company is still in the process of determining the impact of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company does not anticipate a material impact to its consolidated financial position or results of operations as a result of its adoption.

Pensions

The Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries have a defined benefit pension plan (“Plan”) covering their U.S. employees. Plan benefits are generally based on years of service and compensation and are generally noncontributory. Certain foreign subsidiaries also have defined benefit plans covering their employees. The pension expense for all pension plans approximated $17.0 million, $13.5 million and $10.1 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is calculated based upon a number of actuarial assumptions established on January 1 of the applicable year, including an expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets. In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption for the Plan, we evaluated input from our actuaries and investment consultants as well as long-term inflation assumptions. Projected returns by such consultants are based on broad equity and bond indices. We also considered our historical seventeen-year compounded return of 11.5%, which has been in excess of these broad equity and bond benchmark indices. Our expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets is based on an asset allocation assumption of 60% with equity managers, with an expected long-term rate of return of 11%; 25% with fixed income managers, with an expectedlong-term rate of return of 6.75% and 15% with high yield bond managers, with an expected rate of return of 8%. As of December 31, 2006, our asset allocation was 69% with equity managers and 31% with fixed income managers, including high yield managers. We believe that our long-term asset allocation on average will approximate 60% with equity managers and 40% with fixed income managers. We regularly review our actual asset allocation and periodically rebalance our investments to our targeted allocation when considered appropriate. Based on this methodology the Company’s expected long-term rate of return assumption is 9.5% for both 2006 and 2005.

The discount rate used by the Company for valuing pension liabilities is based on a review of high quality corporate bond yields with maturities approximating the remaining life of the projected benefit obligations. The discount rate on this basis has increased from 5.50% at December 31, 2005 to 5.75% at December 31, 2006. This will have the effect of decreasing pension expense in 2007 by approximately $.6 million. Although future changes to the discount rate are unknown, had the discount rate increased or decreased 50 basis points, the pension liability would have decreased $13.8 million or increased $15.2 million, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company effected a curtailment related to the Plan which will result in no additional benefits being credited to salaried employees who have less than 25 years service with the Company, or who have not attained age 50 and who have less than 15 years of service with the Company. This change had the impact of decreasing the unfunded pension liability by $5.1 million at December 31, 2006 and will have the effect of decreasing pension expense during 2007 by approximately $2.9 million. For affected employees, the curtailment in additional Plan benefits was replaced with a Company match defined contribution plan to which the Company expects to contribute approximately $1.8 million in 2007.

The Company made cash contributions to the Plan of $15 million and $10 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The liability for accrued pension and post employment benefit obligations under the Plan increased in 2006 to $138.3 million from $108.8 million in 2005, primarily due to the implementation of SFAS 158 (See Liquidity and Capital Resources section) which resulted in an increase of approximately $21.1 million and the foreign currency translation effect of non-U.S. pension plans. The Company estimates that, based on current actuarial calculations, it will make a voluntary cash contribution to the Plan in 2007 of approximately $15.0 to $20.0 million. Cash contributions in subsequent years will depend on a number of factors including the investment performance of Plan assets and the impact of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 which was signed into law in August 2006. The intent of the legislation is to require companies to fund 100% of their pension liability; and then for companies to fund, on a going-forward basis, an amount generally estimated to be the amount that the pension liability increases each year due to an additional year of service by the employees eligible for pension benefits. The legislation requires that funding shortfalls be eliminated by companies over a seven-year period, beginning in 2008. The Pension Protection Act also extended the provisions of the Pension Funding Equity Act that would have expired in 2006 had the Pension Protection Act not been enacted, which increased the allowed discount rate used to calculate the pension liability. The Pension Protection Act is effective for plan years beginning after 2007 and the Company is in the process of determining the impact of this legislation.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are adjusted as new information becomes available. The Company’s significant accounting policies are set forth below.

Revenue Recognition - The Company’s primary source of revenues is from product sales to its customers. Revenue from sales of the Company’s products is recognized at the time the goods are delivered and title passes, provided the earning process is complete and revenue is measurable. Delivery is determined by the Company’s shipping terms, which are primarily FOB shipping point. Revenue is recorded at the net amount to be received after deductions for estimated discounts, allowances and returns. These estimates and reserves are determined and adjusted as needed based upon historical experience, contract terms and other related factors. The shipping costs for the majority of the Company’s sales are paid directly by the Company’s customers. In the broadband communication market (approximately 11% of consolidated sales), the Company pays for shipping cost to the majority of its customers. Amounts billed to customers related to shipping costs are immaterial and are included in net sales. Shipping costs incurred to transport products to the customer which are not reimbursed are included in selling, general and administrative expense.

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates average cost, or market. Provisions for slow moving and obsolete inventory are made based on historical experience and product demand. Should future product demand change, existing inventory could become slow moving or obsolete and provisions would be increased accordingly.

Depreciable Assets - Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The appropriateness and the recoverability of the carrying value of such assets are periodically reviewed taking into consideration current and expected business conditions. Historically, the Company has not had any significant impairments.

Goodwill - The Company performs its annual evaluation for the impairment of goodwill for the Company’s reporting units, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, as of each June 30. Goodwill impairment for each reporting unit is evaluated using a two-step approach requiring the Company to determine the fair value of the reporting unit and compare that to the carrying value including goodwill. If the carrying value exceeded the fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit would be potentially impaired and a second step of additional testing would be performed to measure the impairment loss. Historically, the Company has not had any impairments.

Defined Benefit Plan Obligation – The defined benefit plan obligation is based on significant assumptions such as mortality rates, discount rates and plan asset rates of return as determined by the Company in consultation with the respective benefit plan actuaries and investment advisors.

The significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Disclosures about contractual obligations and commitments

The following table summarizes the Company’s known obligations to make future payments pursuant to certain contracts as of December 31, 2006, as well as an estimate of the timing in which such obligations are expected to be satisfied:

Contractual Obligations (dollars in thousands)	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		More than 5 years
Long-term debt	$	673,778	$	262	$	1,512	$	671,232	$	772
Capital lease obligations	6,636		2,979		3,657		—		—
Operating leases	56,553		18,101		21,696		10,476		6,280
Purchase obligations	158,677		155,784		2,857		36		—
Other liabilities (1)	29,860		22,147		7,713		—		—

Total	$	925,504	$	199,273	$	37,435	$	681,744	$	7,052

(1) Other liabilities consist of obligations related to acquisitions for additional purchase price and performance-based cash consideration.

Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company, in the normal course of doing business, is exposed to the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

The Company conducts business in several international currencies through its worldwide operations, and as a result is subject to foreign exchange exposure due to changes in exchange rates of the various currencies. Changes in exchange rates can positively or negatively affect the Company’s sales, gross margins and retained earnings. The Company attempts to minimize currency exposure risk by producing its products in the same country or region in which the products are sold, thereby generating revenues and incurring expenses in the same currency and by managing its working capital although there can be no assurance that this approach will be successful, especially in the event of a significant and sudden decline in the value of any of the international currencies of the Company’s worldwide operations. The Company does not engage in purchasing forward exchange contracts for speculative purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

Relative to interest rate risk, the Company completed a refinancing of its senior credit facilities during the third quarter 2005 as discussed in Liquidity and Capital Resources above. In conjunction with the 2005 refinancing and the funds drawn in conjunction with the December 2005 TCS acquisition (Note 7), the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that fixed the Company’s LIBOR interest rate on $150.0 million, $250.0 million and $250.0 million of floating rate debt at 4.82%, 4.24% and 4.85%, expiring in December 2007, July 2008 and December 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s average LIBOR rate was 4.61%. A 10% change in the LIBOR interest rate at December 31, 2006 would not have materially increased or decreased interest expense. The Company does not expect changes in interest rates to have a material effect on income or cash flows in 2007, although there can be no assurances that interest rates will not significantly change.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Amphenol Corporation
Wallingford, Connecticut

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Amphenol Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and other comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. We also have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal Control in Item 9a, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements, an opinion on management’s assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Amphenol Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control —Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

As discussed in Note 1 and Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2006 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share Based Payment applying the modified prospective method and adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
February 19, 2007

Consolidated Statements of Income

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004

Net sales	$	2,471,430		$	1,808,147		$	1,530,446
Cost of sales	1,683,250			1,207,693			1,034,972
Gross profit	788,180			600,454			495,474

Selling, general and administrative expense	342,841			257,127			218,830
Casualty loss related to flood	20,747			—			—
Operating income	424,592			343,327			276,644

Interest expense	(38,799		)	(24,090		)	(22,540		)
Other expenses, net	(12,521		)	(8,871		)	(6,663		)
Expense for early extinguishment of debt	—			(2,398		)	—
Income before income taxes	373,272			307,968			247,441
Provision for income taxes	(117,581		)	(101,629		)	(84,130		)
Net income	$	255,691		$	206,339		$	163,311

Net income per common share – Basic	$	2.86		$	2.33		$	1.86

Average common shares outstanding – Basic	89,463,822			88,551,630			88,023,082

Net income per common share – Diluted	$	2.79		$	2.28		$	1.82

Average common shares outstanding - Diluted	91,673,663			90,471,737			89,736,656

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	December 31,
	2006			2005
*Assets*
Current Assets:
Cash and short-term cash investments	$	74,135		$	38,669
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,677 and $11,162, respectively	383,858			302,867
Inventories:
Raw materials and supplies	94,830			101,042
Work in process	214,190			141,944
Finished goods	107,479			82,879
	416,499			325,865
Prepaid expenses and other assets	60,113			42,413
Total current assets	934,605			709,814

Land and depreciable assets:
Land	15,602			15,582
Buildings	115,780			112,449
Machinery and equipment	547,162			478,266
	678,544			606,297
Less accumulated depreciation	(404,401		)	(352,408		)
	274,143			253,889
Deferred debt issuance costs	2,947			2,351
Goodwill	926,242			886,720
Other assets	57,460			79,766
	$	2,195,397		$	1,932,540

*Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity*
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	234,868		$	177,266
Accrued interest	4,156			4,998
Accrued salaries, wages and employee benefits	53,158			42,705
Accrued income taxes	63,046			45,124
Other accrued expenses	89,190			50,807
Current portion of long-term debt	3,241			15,030
Total current liabilities	447,659			335,930
Long-term debt	677,173			765,970
Accrued pension and post employment benefit obligations	138,312			108,816
Other liabilities	29,259			32,589
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Notes 2, 6 and 12)
Shareholders’ Equity:
Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 89,132,989 and 89,311,958 shares outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively	89			89
Additional paid-in capital (deficit)	(119,331		)	(164,082		)
Accumulated earnings	1,142,536			985,317
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(81,084		)	(77,742		)
Treasury stock, at cost; 602,900 and 1,673,100 shares at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively	(39,216		)	(54,347		)
Total shareholders’ equity	902,994			689,235
	$	2,195,397		$	1,932,540

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Other Comprehensive Income

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

				Additional									Accumulated
				Paid-In									Other						Total
	Common			Capital			Comprehensive			Accumulated			Comprehensive			Treasury			Shareholders
	Stock			(Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Stock			Equity
Balance January 1, 2004	$	87		$	(238,167	)				$	626,430		$	(64,944	)	$	—		$	323,406
Comprehensive income:
Net income							$	163,311		163,311									163,311
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Translation adjustments							11,904						11,904						11,904
Revaluation of interest rate derivatives							2,116						2,116						2,116
Minimum pension liability adjustment							(4,154		)				(4,154		)				(4,154		)
Other comprehensive income							9,866
Comprehensive income							173,177
Purchase of treasury stock																(45,643		)	(45,643		)
Deferred compensation				329															329
Stock options exercised, including tax benefit	1			30,334															30,335
Balance December 31, 2004	88			(207,504		)				789,741			(55,078		)	(45,643		)	481,604
Comprehensive income:
Net income							206,339			206,339									206,339
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Translation adjustments							(11,956		)				(11,956		)				(11,956		)
Revaluation of interest rate derivatives							(297		)				(297		)				(297		)
Minimum pension liability adjustment							(10,411		)				(10,411		)				(10,411		)
Other comprehensive loss							(22,664		)
Comprehensive income							183,675
Purchase of treasury stock																(8,704		)	(8,704		)
Deferred compensation				193															193
Stock options exercised, including tax benefit	1			36,449															36,450
Dividends declared										(10,763		)							(10,763		)
Shares issued in connection with acquisition				6,780															6,780
Balance December 31, 2005	89			(164,082		)				985,317			(77,742		)	(54,347		)	689,235
Comprehensive income:
Net income							255,691			255,691									255,691
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Translation adjustments							16,829						16,829						16,829
Revaluation of interest rate derivatives							1,894						1,894						1,894
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of tax (Note 5)													(19,282		)				(19,282		)
Defined benefit plan liability adjustment							(2,783		)				(2,783		)				(2,783		)
Other comprehensive income							15,940
Comprehensive income							$	271,631
Purchase of treasury stock																(72,658		)	(72,658		)
Retirement of treasury stock	(2		)							(87,787		)				87,789			—
Deferred compensation				195															195
Stock options exercised, including tax benefit	2			34,838															34,840
Dividends declared										(10,685		)							(10,685		)
Stock-based compensation expense				9,718															9,718
Balance December 31, 2006	$	89		$	(119,331	)				$	1,142,536		$	(81,084	)	$	(39,216	)	$	902,994

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004

Net income	$	255,691		$	206,339		$	163,311
Adjustments for cash from operations:
Depreciation and amortization	72,592			50,666			38,829
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs	532			976			1,428
Stock-based compensation expense	9,718			—			—
Non-cash expense for early extinguishment of debt	—			5,666			—
Non-cash impact related to flood	9,307			—			—
Gain on disposal of fixed assets	(60		)	—			—
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(60,603		)	(45,152		)	(26,016		)
Net change in receivables sold	—			5,000			6,200
Inventory	(81,878		)	(20,636		)	(14,511		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(18,959		)	5,582			1,721
Accounts payable	46,382			25,828			3,240
Accrued income taxes	17,922			23			28,483
Accrued liabilities	29,062			(10,389		)	15,731
Accrued interest	(1,133		)	2,998			(740		)
Accrued pension and post employment benefits	11,585			511			(12,929		)
Deferred taxes and other assets	(2,541		)	1,800			1,344
Other	1,980			412			2,160
Cash flow provided by operations	289,597			229,624			208,251
Cash flow from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment	(82,421		)	(57,121		)	(44,341		)
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets	5,921			—			—
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(22,473		)	(512,307		)	(41,661		)
Cash flow used in investing activities	(98,973		)	(569,428		)	(86,002		)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Net change in borrowings under revolving credit facilities	(102,557		)	744,131			(14,302		)
Decrease in borrowings under Bank Agreement	—			(413,000		)	(86,000		)
Payment of fees and expenses related to refinancing	(1,144		)	(2,542		)	—
Purchase of treasury stock	(72,658		)	(8,704		)	(45,643		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	21,882			36,450			30,335
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements	10,043			—			—
Dividend payments	(10,724		)	(8,034		)	—
Cash flow (used in) provided by financing activities	(155,158		)	348,301			(115,610		)
Net change in cash and short-term cash investments	35,466			8,497			6,639
Cash and short-term cash investments balance, beginning of period	38,669			30,172			23,533
Cash and short-term cash investments balance, end of period	$	74,135		$	38,669		$	30,172

Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	39,109		$	20,272		$	21,868
Income taxes paid, net of refunds	77,849			85,562			43,660

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Operations

Amphenol Corporation (“Amphenol” or the “Company”) is in two business segments which consist of manufacturing and selling interconnect products and assemblies, and manufacturing and selling cable products. The Company sells its products to customer locations worldwide.

Use of Estimates

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

The Company has changed the presentation of the Consolidated Statements of Income to include depreciation and amortization expense in Cost of sales and Selling, general & administrative expense allowing for Gross profit to be presented. This change has been made to Statements of Income disclosures throughout the 10-K for consistency and to prior years presented. Depreciation and amortization expense was previously presented as a separate line on the income statement.

Certain other 2004 and 2005 information has been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation.

Cash and Short-Term Cash Investments

Cash and short-term cash investments consist of cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of less than three months. The carrying amount approximates fair value of those instruments.

Sale of Receivables

A subsidiary of the Company has an agreement with a financial institution whereby the subsidiary can sell an undivided interest of up to $100,000 in a designated pool of qualified accounts receivable. The Company services, administers and collects the receivables on behalf of the purchaser. On July 31, 2006, the Company terminated its then existing accounts receivable securitization facility and entered into a new Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “New Agreement”). The New Agreement allows the Company to sell an undivided interest of up to $100,000 in a designated pool of qualified accounts receivable at costs that are lower than the previous agreement. The remaining terms and conditions of the New Agreement remained substantially the same as the previous facility. The New Agreement includes certain covenants and provides for various events of termination and expires in July 2009. Due to the short-term nature of the accounts receivable, the fair value approximates the carrying value. Program fees payable to the purchaser under this agreement are equivalent to rates afforded high quality commercial paper issuers plus certain administrative expenses and are included in other expenses, net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The aggregate value of receivables transferred to the pool for the year 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $854,372, $761,129, and $606,136, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, $107,394 and $44,958, respectively, of accounts receivable were transferred to the subsidiary, but not purchased by the financial institution and are therefore included in the accounts receivable balance in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, approximately $85,000 of receivables were sold under the previous agreement and the New Agreement and are therefore not reflected in the accounts receivable balance in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost, which approximates average cost, or market. The principal components of cost included in inventories are materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead.

Depreciable Assets

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over the respective asset lives determined on a composite basis by asset group or on a specific item basis using the estimated useful lives of such assets which range from 3 to 12 years for machinery and equipment and 20 to 40 years for buildings. It is the Company’s policy to periodically review fixed asset lives.

Deferred Debt Issuance Costs

Deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized on the interest method over the term of the related debt and such amortization is included in interest expense.

Goodwill

The Company performs its annual evaluation for the impairment of goodwill for the Company’s reporting units, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142 (“FAS 142”), as of each June 30. The Company has defined its reporting units as the operating segments within its two reportable business segments “Interconnect Products and Assemblies” and “Cable Products”, as the components of these operating segments have similar economic characteristics. Goodwill impairment for each reporting unit is evaluated using a two-step approach requiring the Company to determine the fair value of the reporting unit and compare that to the carrying value including goodwill. If the carrying value exceeded the fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit would be potentially impaired and a second step of additional testing would be performed to measure the impairment loss. As of June 30, 2006, and for each previous year in which the impairment test has been performed, the fair market value of the Company’s reporting units exceeded the carrying value and therefore no impairment was recognized.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s primary source of revenues is from product sales to its customers.

Revenue from sales of the Company’s products is recognized at the time the goods are delivered and title passes, provided the earning process is complete and revenue is measurable. Delivery is determined by the Company’s shipping terms, which are primarily FOB shipping point. Revenue is recorded at the net amount to be received after deductions for estimated discounts, allowances and returns. These estimates and reserves are determined and adjusted as needed based upon historical experience, contract terms and other related factors.

The shipping costs for the majority of the Company’s sales are paid directly by the Company’s customers. In the broadband communication market (approximately 11% of consolidated sales), the Company pays for shipping cost to the majority of its customers. Amounts billed to customers related to shipping costs are immaterial and are included in net sales. Shipping costs incurred to transport products to the customer which are not reimbursed are included in selling, general and administrative expense.

Retirement Pension Plans

Costs for retirement pension plans include current service costs and amortization of prior service costs over periods of up to thirty years. It is the Company’s policy to fund current pension costs taking into consideration minimum funding requirements and maximum tax deductible limitations. The expense of retiree medical benefit programs is recognized during the employees’ service with the Company as well as amortization of a transition obligation previously recognized.

Stock Options

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. This pronouncement amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123”, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that companies account for awards of equity instruments under the fair value method of accounting and recognize such amounts in their statements of operations. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method and, in connection therewith compensation expense is recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2006 over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. The Company recognizes expense for stock-based compensation with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the entire award. Stock-based compensation expense includes the estimated effects of forfeitures, and estimates of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of expense to be recognized in future periods. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company recorded stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion 25. The Company estimated the fair value of stock option awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and disclosed the resulting estimated compensation effect on net income on a pro forma basis. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 the Company’s income before income taxes was reduced by $9,718 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The expense incurred for stock-based compensation plans is classified in selling, general and administrative expenses on the accompanying Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Prior to January 1, 2006. the Company applied APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for stock options. Accordingly, no compensation cost had been recognized for the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. Had compensation cost for stock options been determined based on the fair value of the option at date of grant consistent with the provisions of FAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

	2005			2004

Net income	$	206,339		$	163,311
Less:Total stock based compensation expense determined under Black-Scholes option pricing model, net of related tax effects	(4,936		)	(4,714		)
Pro forma net income	$	201,403		$	158,597

Earnings Per Share:
Basic-as reported	$	2.33		$	1.86
Basic-pro forma	$	2.27		$	1.80
Diluted-as reported	$	2.28		$	1.82
Diluted-pro forma	$	2.23		$	1.77

The fair value of stock options has been estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	2006		2005		2004
Risk free interest rate	4.9	%	4.0	%	3.4	%
Expected life	5 years		5 years		5 years
Expected volatility	30.0	%	25.0	%	27.0	%
Expected dividend yield	0.2	%	0.3	%	0.0	%

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are provided for revenue and expenses which are recognized in different periods for income tax and financial statement purposes. Deferred income taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings of foreign affiliated companies which are considered to be permanently invested. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable. Deferred tax assets are regularly assessed for recoverability based on both historical and anticipated earnings levels and a valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that these amounts will not be recovered.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s significant foreign subsidiaries are measured using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries have been translated at current exchange rates and related revenues and expenses have been translated at weighted average exchange rates. The aggregate effect of translation adjustments so calculated is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders’ equity. Transaction gains and losses related to operating assets and liabilities are included in selling, general and administrative expense and those related to non-operating assets and liabilities are included in other expense, net.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for the creation of new and improved products and processes were $53,730, $37,510, and $32,459, for the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Environmental Obligations

The Company recognizes the potential cost for environmental remediation activities when assessments are made, remedial efforts are probable and related amounts can be reasonably estimated; potential insurance reimbursements are not recorded. The Company regularly assesses its environmental liabilities through reviews of contractual commitments, site assessments, feasibility studies and formal remedial design and action plans.

Net Income per Common Share

Basic income per common share is based on the net income for the period divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted income per common share assumes the exercise of outstanding, dilutive stock options using the treasury stock method. On January 21, 2004, the Company announced a 2-for-1 stock split that was effective for shareholders of record as of March 17, 2004. The additional shares were distributed on March 29, 2004. The share information included herein has been restated to reflect the effect of such stock split.

On January 17, 2007, the Company announced a 2-for-1 stock split that will be effective for stockholders of record as March 16, 2007 and these additional shares are expected to be distributed on or about March 30, 2007. The share information herein has not been restated to reflect the effect of such stock split. Had this stock split occurred at December 31, 2006, total authorized shares of Common Stock would have been 400,000,000, total shares outstanding would have been 178,265,978 and net income per share on a diluted basis would have been $1.39.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments, which are periodically used by the Company in the management of its interest rate and foreign currency exposures, are accounted for on an accrual basis. Income and expense are recorded in the same category as that arising from the related asset or liability. For example, amounts to be paid or received under interest rate swap agreements are recognized as an increase or decrease of interest expense in the periods in which they accrue. Gains and losses on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges resulting from changes in fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income, and subsequently reflected in net income in a manner that matches the timing of the actual income or expense of such instruments with the hedged transaction. At December 31, 2006, the Company had interest rate swap agreements that fix the Company’s LIBOR interest rate on $150,000, $250,000 and $250,000 of floating rate bank debt at 4.82%, 4.24% and 4.85%, expiring in December 2007, July 2008 and December 2008, respectively. These agreements are designated as cash flow hedges and accounted for as described above.

Recent Accounting Changes

Note 2—Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

	Average Interest Rate at December 31, 2006		Maturity	December 31,
	Average Interest Rate at December 31, 2006		Maturity	2006		2005

Revolving Credit Facility	5.12	%	2011	$	652,700	$	720,900
Notes payable to foreign banks and other debt	5.13	%	2006-2018	27,714		60,100
				680,414		781,000
Less current portion				3,241		15,030
Total long-term debt				$	677,173	$	765,970

On July 15, 2005, the Company completed a refinancing of its senior secured credit facility. The new bank agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) was comprised of a five-year $750,000 unsecured revolving credit facility that was originally scheduled to expire in July 2010, of which approximately $440,000 was drawn at closing. The net proceeds from the refinancing were used to repay all amounts outstanding under the Company’s previous senior credit facility and for working capital purposes. On November 15, 2005, the Company exercised its option to increase its aggregate commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility by an additional $250,000 thereby increasing the revolving credit facility to $1,000,000 from $750,000. On August 1, 2006, the Company amended the Revolving Credit Facility to reduce borrowing costs and increase the general indebtedness basket by $250,000 through an accordion feature similar to that exercised on November 15, 2005. In addition, the term of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended from July 2010 to August 2011.

At December 31, 2006, availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was $335,037, after a reduction of $12,263 for outstanding letters of credit. In connection with the 2005 refinancing, the Company incurred one-time expenses for the early extinguishment of debt of $2,398. Such one-time expenses include the write-off of unamortized deferred debt issuance costs less the gain on the termination of related interest rate swap agreements. The Company’s interest rate on borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility is LIBOR plus 50 basis points. The Company also pays certain annual agency and facility fees. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s was BBB- and from Moody’s was Ba1. The Revolving Credit Facility requires that the Company satisfy certain financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA divided by interest expense) of higher than 3X and a leverage ratio (Debt divided by EBITDA) lower than 3.50X; at December 31, 2006, such ratios as defined in the Revolving Credit Facility were 11.53X and 1.47X, respectively. The Revolving Credit Facility also includes limitations with respect to, among other things, (i) indebtedness in excess of $50,000 for capital leases, $450,000 for general indebtedness, $200,000 for acquisition indebtedness, (of which approximately $6,636, $2,369 and $nil were outstanding at December 31, 2006, respectively), (ii) restricted payments including dividends on the Company’s Common Stock in excess of 50% of

consolidated cumulative net income subsequent to July 15, 2005 plus $250,000, or approximately $429,117 at December 31, 2006, (iii) required consolidated net worth equal to 50% of cumulative consolidated net income commencing April 1, 2005 plus 100% of net cash proceeds from equity issuances commencing April 1, 2005, plus $400,000, or approximately $607,827 at December 31, 2006, (iv) creating or incurring liens, (v) making other investments, and (vi) acquiring or disposing of assets.

In conjunction with the Revolving Credit Facility , the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that fixed the Company’s LIBOR interest rate on $150,000, $250,000 and $250,000 of floating rate bank debt at 4.82%, 4.24% and 4.85%, expiring in December 2007, July 2008 and December 2008, respectively. The fair value of such agreements was estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers which represented the amounts that the Company would receive or pay if the agreements were terminated. The fair value indicated that termination of the agreements at December 31, 2006 would have resulted in a pre-tax gain of $4,926; such gain, net of tax of $1,887, was recorded in other comprehensive income.

The maturity of the Company’s long-term debt over each of the next five years ending December 31, is as follows: 2007 - $3,241; 2008 - $3,656; 2009 - $1,514; 2010 - $510; 2011 - $670,722; thereafter $771.

The Company estimates that the fair value of its long-term debt approximates book value.

Note 3—Income Taxes

The components of income before income taxes and the provision for income taxes are as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005		2004

Income before taxes:
United States	$	135,904		$	132,715	$	103,240
Foreign	237,368			175,253		144,201
	$	373,272		$	307,968	$	247,441

Current provision:
United States	$	58,355		$	57,851	$	46,437
Foreign	54,653			41,230		32,570
	113,008			99,081		79,007

Deferred provision:
United States	6,667			2,413		4,263
Foreign	(2,094		)	135		860
	4,573			2,548		5,123
Total provision for income taxes	$	117,581		$	101,629	$	84,130

At December 31, 2006, the Company had $16,270 and $1,018 of foreign tax loss and credit carryforwards, and state tax credit carryforwards net of federal benefit, respectively, of which $3,017 and $914, respectively, expire or will be refunded at various dates through 2020 and the balance can be carried forward indefinitely.

A valuation allowance of $4,143 and $3,466 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, has been recorded which relates to the foreign net operating loss carryforwards and state tax credits. The net change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was an increase of $677 and $253 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The net change in the valuation allowance in both 2006 and 2005 was related to foreign net operating loss and foreign and state credit carryforwards.

Differences between the U.S. statutory federal tax rate and the Company’s effective income tax rate are analyzed below:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004

U.S. statutory federal tax rate	35.0	%	35.0	%	35.0	%
State and local taxes	1.5		1.9		1.5
Foreign earnings and dividends taxed at different rates	(6.0	)	(3.5	)	(2.9	)
Valuation allowance	.1		—		.5
Other	.9		(.4	)	(.1	)
Effective tax rate	31.5	%	33.0	%	34.0	%

The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, excluding a valuation allowance, were comprised of the following:

	December 31,
	2006		2005

Deferred tax assets relating to:
Accrued liabilities and reserves	$	11,403	$	14,777
Operating loss and tax credit carryforwards	5,927		4,041
Pensions	29,325		19,592
Employee benefits	6,303		3,085
	$	52,958	$	41,495

Deferred tax liabilities relating to:
Goodwill	$	21,046	$	11,881
Depreciation	4,232		5,802
	$	25,278	$	17,683

The deferred tax pension asset in the table above includes $56,902 and $44,036 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to the portion of the defined benefit plan liability recorded through accumulated other comprehensive income.

On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”) was signed into law. Under Internal Revenue Code Section 965, the Act created a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate income earned abroad in 2005 by providing an 85% dividends received deduction for certain dividends. The Company applied the provisions of the Act to a portion of its qualifying 2005 repatriations of current year earnings. The amount of earnings that the Company repatriated under the provision was $32,134. The income tax incurred as a result of this repatriation was $1,211. The Company has also applied a provision of the Act that allows a deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities, which will be phased in from 2005 through 2010 and a two-year phase-out of the existing extra-territorial income exclusion (“ETI”) for foreign sales.

The Company is subject to periodic audits of its various tax returns by government agencies; management does not believe that amounts, if any, which may be required to be paid by reason of such audits will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company has recorded accruals for certain tax contingencies related to various tax matters as of December 31, 2006.

Note 4—Shareholders’ Equity

The Company has two option plans for employees (the “Option Plans”), the 1997 Option Plan and the 2000 Option Plan, which was amended in May 2006 to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance from 8,000,000 to 12,000,000 shares as well as to increase the number of options that may be granted to any one participant from not more than 2,000,000 to not more than 3,000,000 options. The Option Plans authorize the granting of stock options by a committee of the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2006, the maximum number of shares of common stock available for the granting of stock options under the Option Plans was 3,667,930. Options granted under the Option Plans vest ratably over a period of five years and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant. In addition, shares issued in conjunction with the exercise of stock options under the Option Plans are subject to Management Stockholder Agreements. In 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock Option Plan for Directors of Amphenol Corporation (the “Directors Plan”). The Directors Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2006, the maximum number of shares of common stock available for the granting of stock options under the Directors Plan was 190,000. Options granted under the Directors Plan vest ratably over a period of three years and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.

Stock option activity for 2004, 2005 and 2006 was as follows:

					Weighted
					Average
					Remaining	Aggregate
			Weighted Average		Contractual	Intrinsic
	Options		Exercise Price		Term (in years)	Value

Options outstanding at December 31, 2003	7,863,750		$	17.99	6.56
Options granted	1,062,600		30.30
Options exercised	(1,652,042	)	11.50
Options cancelled	(262,100	)	22.53
Options outstanding at December 31, 2004	7,012,208		21.22		6.51
Options granted	1,054,400		36.93
Options exercised	(1,466,962	)	16.86
Options cancelled	(206,140	)	23.60
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005	6,393,506		24.68		6.44
Options granted	1,137,600		53.64
Options exercised	(1,017,973	)	21.50
Options cancelled	(55,420	)	32.87
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006	6,457,713		30.21		6.34	$	205,801

Exercisable at December 31, 2006	3,400,998		$	22.47	4.79	$	134,697

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested options as of December 31, 2006 and changes during the year then ended is as follows:

	Options		Weighted Average Fair Value at Grant Date

Non-vested options at December 31, 2005	3,041,288		$	9.13
Options granted	1,137,600		18.41		(1)
Options vested	(1,066,753	)	8.97
Options cancelled	(55,420	)	10.64

Non-vested options at December 31, 2006	3,056,715		$	12.61

(1) The weighted-average fair value of options granted during 2005 and 2004 were $10.69 and $9.15, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the following activity occurred under our plans:

	2006		2005

Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised	$	39,471	$	35,452
Total fair value of stock awards vested	9,573		10,937

On December 31, 2006 the total compensation cost related to non-vested options not yet recognized is approximately $27,542, with a weighted average expected amortization period of 3.58 years.

On January 19, 2005, the Company announced that it would commence payment of quarterly dividend on its common stock of $.03 per share. The Company paid its fourth quarterly dividend in the amount of $2,691 or $.03 per share on January 3, 2007 to shareholders of record as of December 13, 2006. Cumulative dividends declared during 2006 were $10,685 of which $8,045 were paid in 2006. Total dividends paid in 2006 were $10,724 including those declared in 2005 and paid in 2006.

Balances of related after-tax components comprising accumulated other comprehensive loss included in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, are as follows:

	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment			Revaluation of Interest Rate Derivatives			Defined Benefit Plan Liability Adjustment			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Balance at January 1, 2004	$	(5,918	)	$	(669	)	$	(58,357	)	$	(64,944	)
Translation adjustments	11,904			—			—			11,904
Revaluation of interest rate derivatives, net of tax of $1,388	—			2,116			—			2,116
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $2,927	—			—			(4,154		)	(4,154		)
Balance at December 31, 2004	5,986			1,447			(62,511		)	(55,078		)
Translation adjustments	(11,956		)	—			—			(11,956		)
Revaluation of interest rate derivatives, net of tax of $1,148	—			(297		)	—			(297		)
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $6,020	—			—			(10,411		)	(10,411		)
Balance at December 31, 2005	(5,970		)	1,150			(72,922		)	(77,742		)
Translation adjustments	16,829			—			—			16,829
Revaluation of interest rate derivatives, net of tax of $1,176	—			1,894			—			1,894
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of tax of $11,868	—			—			(19,282		)	(19,282		)
Defined benefit plan liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,713	—			—			(2,783		)	(2,783		)
Balance at December 31, 2006	$	10,859		$	3,044		$	(94,987	)	$	(81,084	)

Note 5—Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 158 (“SFAS”), “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”. SFAS 158 requires employers to fully recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its balance sheet. The pension asset or liability under SFAS 158 is equal to the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and its projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans. Prior guidance required the liability to be measured as the accumulated benefit obligation. In addition, this statement requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end balance sheet, with limited exceptions. SFAS 158 also requires entities to disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The statement is effective for years ending after December 15, 2006 except for the requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end balance sheet which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. SFAS 158 had the effect of increasing the Company’s accrued benefit obligation (including the elimination of the intangible asset of $10,020 at December 31, 2005) and other comprehensive income, net of deferred tax assets, by approximately $31,100 and $19,282, respectively, at December 31, 2006 and did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of income.

	December 31,
	2006			2005

Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	357,844		$	335,045
Service cost	9,740			8,219
Interest cost	18,804			18,237
Plan participants’ contributions	492			473
Plan amendments	2,187			92
Actuarial loss	19,142			26,079
Settlements & curtailments	(5,133		)	—
Foreign exchange translation	10,941			(12,995		)
Benefits paid	(19,373		)	(17,306		)
Benefit obligation at end of year	394,644			357,844
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	232,696			217,878
Actual return on plan assets	32,760			19,967
Employer contributions	18,447			12,486
Plan participants’ contributions	492			473
Foreign exchange translation	5,006			(2,239		)
Benefits paid	(17,820		)	(15,869		)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	271,581			232,696
Funded status at end of year	(123,063		)	(125,148		)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss	—			138,668
Unrecognized prior service cost	—			10,020
Unrecognized transition obligation net	—			(1,045		)
Additional minimum pension liability	—			(128,449		)
Accrued benefit cost	$	(123,063	)	$	(105,954	)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004

Components of net pension expense:
Service cost	$	9,740		$	8,219		$	7,069
Interest cost	18,804			18,237			17,649
Expected return on plan assets	(22,491		)	(21,251		)	(20,152		)
Net amortization of actuarial losses	10,974			8,328			5,537

Net pension expense	$	17,027		$	13,533		$	10,103

	Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31,
	Pension Benefits				Other Benefits
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Discount rate:
U.S. plans	5.75	%	5.50	%	5.75	%	5.50	%
International plans	4.67	%	4.23	%	n/a		n/a
Rate of compensation increase:
U.S. plans	3.00	%	3.00	%	n/a		n/a
International plans	2.68	%	2.62	%	n/a		n/a

	Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31,
	Pension Benefits				Other Benefits
	2006		2005			2006		2005
Discount rate:
U.S. plans	5.50	%	5.75	%		5.50	%	5.75	%
International plans	4.46	%	5.26	%		n/a		n/a
Expected long-term return on assets:
U.S. plans	9.50	%	9.50	%		n/a		n/a
International plans	8.32	%	8.33	%		n/a		n/a
Rate of compensation increase:
U.S. plans	3.00	%	3.00	%		n/a		n/a
International plans	2.75	%	2.75	%		n/a		n/a

The pension expense for pension plans is calculated based upon a number of actuarial assumptions established on January 1 of the applicable year, detailed in the table above, including a weighted-average discount rate, rate of increase in future compensation levels and an expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets. The discount rate used by the Company for valuing pension liabilities is based on a review of high quality corporate bond yields with maturities approximating the remaining life of the projected benefit obligations. The Company’s U.S. Pension Plan comprised the majority of pension obligations, pension assets and pension expense. The discount rate for the U.S. Pension Plan has increased from 5.50% at December 31, 2005 to 5.75% at December 31, 2006. This will have the effect of decreasing pension expense in 2007 by approximately $600. Although future changes to the discount rate are unknown, had the discount rate increased or decreased 50 basis points, the pension liability would have decreased $13,800 or increased $15,200, respectively.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company effected a curtailment on the U.S. Pension Plan which will result in no additional benefits being credited to salaried employees who have less than 25 years service with the Company, or who have not attained age 50 and who have less than 15 years of service with the Company. This change had the impact of decreasing the unfunded pension liability by $5,133 at December 31, 2006 and will have the effect of decreasing pension expense during 2007 by approximately $2,900. For affected employees, the curtailment in additional Plan benefits was replaced with a Company match defined contribution plan to which the Company expects to contribute approximately $1,800 in 2007.

In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption on U.S. plan assets which consist mainly of U.S. equity and debt securities, the Company evaluated input from actuaries and investment consultants as well as long-term inflation assumptions. Projected returns by such consultants are based on broad equity and bond indices. The Company also considered its historical seventeen-year compound return of 11.5%, which has been in excess of these broad equity and bond benchmark indices. The Company’s expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets is based on an asset allocation assumption of 60% with equity managers, with an expected long-term rate of 11%, 25% with fixed income managers, with an expected long-term rate of return of 6.75% and 15% with high yield bond managers, with an expected rate of return of 8%. At December 31, 2006, the Company’s asset allocation was 69% with equity managers and 31% with fixed income managers, including high yield managers. The Company believes that its long-term asset allocation on average will approximate 60% with equity managers and 40% with fixed income managers. The Company regularly reviews its actual asset allocation and periodically rebalances investments to its targeted allocation when considered appropriate. Based on this methodology the Company’s expected long-term rate of return assumption is 9.5% in 2006 and 2005. The Company has also adopted an unfunded Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which provides for the payment of the portion of annual pension which cannot be paid from the retirement plan as a result of regulatory limitations on average compensation for purposes of the benefit computation. The largest non-U.S. pension plan, in accordance with local custom, is unfunded and had a projected benefit obligation of approximately $52,000 and $47,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Such obligation is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the tables above.

In accordance with the provisions of FAS No. 87 (prior to the implementation of SFAS 158 as discussed above), the Company recognized a minimum pension liability at December 31, 2005 of $128,449 for circumstances in which a pension plan’s accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of the plan’s assets and accrued pension liability. Such liability was partially offset by an intangible asset equal to the unrecognized prior service cost, with the net change of $10,411 at December 31, 2005, recorded as a reduction in shareholders’ equity, net of related deferred tax benefits. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 158, this intangible asset was eliminated upon adoption at December 31, 2006.

The Company made a $15,000 voluntary cash contribution to the U.S. Pension Plan in 2006 and made benefit payments of $15,400. The Company estimates that based on current actuarial calculations it will make a voluntary cash contribution to the U.S. Pension Plan in 2007 of $15,000 to $20,000. Cash contributions in subsequent years will depend on a number of factors including performance of plan assets. In August 2006, the President signed into law the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The intent of the legislation is to require companies to fund 100% of their pension liability; and then for companies to fund, on a going-forward basis, an amount generally estimated to be the amount that the pension liability increases each year due to an additional year of service by the employees eligible for pension benefits. The legislation requires that funding shortfalls be eliminated by companies over a seven-year period, beginning in 2008. The Pension Protection Act also extended the provisions of the Pension Funding Equity Act that would have expired in 2006 had the Pension Protection Act not been enacted, which increased the allowed discount rate used to calculate the pension liability. The Pension Protection Act is effective for plan years beginning after 2007 and the Company is in the process of determining the impact of this legislation.

The Company offers various defined contribution plans for U.S. and non-U.S. employees. Participation in these plans is based on certain eligibility requirements. During 2006, the Company provided matching contributions for a portion of those plans which totaled approximately $1,900 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Effective January 1, 2007, in conjunction with the curtailment of certain additional U.S. Pension Plan benefits for salaried employees described above, the Company will begin matching the majority of employee contributions to the U.S. defined contribution plans with cash contributions up to a maximum of 5% of eligible compensation.

The Company maintains self-insurance programs for that portion of its health care and workers compensation costs not covered by insurance. The Company also provides certain health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible retirees through postretirement benefit programs. The Company’s share of the cost of such plans for most participants is fixed, and any increase in the cost of such plans will be the responsibility of the retirees. The Company funds the benefit costs for such plans on a pay-as-you-go basis. Since the Company’s obligation for postretirement medical plans is fixed and since the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (“APBO”) and the net postretirement benefit expense are not material in relation to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations, we believe any change in medical costs from that estimated will not have a significant impact on the Company. The implementation of SFAS 158 required the Company to record the underfunded status of its postretirement plan at December 31, 2006 as measured by the APBO. The discount rate used in determining the APBO at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was 5.75% and 5.50%, respectively. Summary information on the Company’s postretirement medical plans is as follows:

	December 31,
	2006			2005
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	14,022		$	13,104
Service cost	134			114
Interest cost	745			786
Paid benefits and expenses	(1,619		)	(1,734		)
Actuarial loss	1,967			1,752
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	15,249		$	14,022

Funded status	$	(15,249	)	$	(14,022	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss	—			10,725
Unrecognized transition obligation	—			435
Accrued benefit cost	$	(15,249	)	$	(2,862	)

	Year ended December 31,
	2006		2005		2004

Components of net postretirement benefit cost:
Service cost	$	134	$	114	$	84
Interest cost	745		786		776
Amortization of transition obligation	62		62		62
Net amortization of actuarial losses	1,069		1,079		900
Net postretirement benefit cost	$	2,010	$	2,041	$	1,822

Note 6—Leases

At December 31, 2006, the Company was committed under operating leases which expire at various dates. Total rent expense under operating leases for the years 2006, 2005, and 2004 were $23,441, $19,257 and $17,664, respectively.

Minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

2007	$	18,101
2008	13,039
2009	8,657
2010	6,003
2011	4,473
Beyond 2011	6,280
Total minimum obligation	$	56,553

Note 7—TCS Acquisition

On December 1, 2005, pursuant to an Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 10, 2005 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among Amphenol Corporation (the “Company”) and Teradyne, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“Teradyne”), The Company purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of Teradyne’s backplane and connection systems business segment (“TCS”), including the stock of certain of its operating subsidiaries for a total purchase price of approximately $384,700 in cash including purchase price adjustments of $5,300. In addition, Amphenol incurred approximately $8,800 of transaction related expenses. The accompanying Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2005 includes the results of TCS for the period subsequent to the acquisition date; sales of approximately $34,000 and minimal net income resulting in no impact to 2005 consolidated net earnings per share. TCS results are reflected for the full year 2006.

TCS is headquartered in Nashua, New Hampshire and is a leading supplier of high-speed, high-density, printed circuit board interconnect products. TCS sells its products primarily to the data communications, storage and server markets, wireless infrastructure markets and industrial markets. TCS had total sales of $373,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Current assets	$	98,965
Land and depreciable assets	32,913
Goodwill	240,036
Intangible assets	46,200
Other assets	49
Assets Acquired	418,163

Current liabilities	24,937
Liabilities Assumed	24,937

Net Assets Acquired	$	393,226

Of the $46,200 of acquired intangible assets, $30,700, $9,500 and $6,000 was assigned to proprietary technology, customer relationships and license agreements, respectively, all of which are subject to amortization. The acquired intangible assets have a total weighted-average useful life of approximately 12 years. The license agreements, proprietary technology and customer relationships have a weighted average useful life of 8 years, 15 years and 5 years, respectively. The entire amount of goodwill was assigned to the interconnect segment all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following table summarizes the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information assuming that the TCS acquisition actually occurred as of the beginning of the period presented. On a pro forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2005, TCS had sales and operating income of $373,000 and $6,700, respectively. Such amounts along with $22,200 of additional pro forma interest expense and related bank fees on borrowings to fund the acquisition are reflected in the pro forma amounts shown below. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and reflect a reasonable estimate of the effects of the TCS acquisition for the periods presented on the basis set forth herein. The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what our financial position or results of operations would have been had the TCS acquisition in fact occurred on the dates assumed, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods.

	For The Year Ended December 31,
	2005		2004
Net sales	$	2,146,286	$	1,940,834
Operating income	347,301		304,451
Net income	195,675		166,746

Net income per common share - Basic	$	2.21	$	1.89
Net income per common share - Diluted	2.16		1.86

Note 8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As of December 31, 2006, the Company has goodwill totaling $926,242 of which $852,693 related to the Interconnect Products and Assemblies segment with the remainder related to the Cable Products segment. In 2006, goodwill increased by $39,522 primarily as a result of an acquisition with an aggregate acquisition price of approximately $18,000 less the fair value of assets acquired of approximately $5,600, one smaller acquisition with a total acquisition price of approximately $10,000, less the fair value of net assets acquired of $4,500, plus the recording of liabilities for performance-based additional cash consideration

and net purchase accounting adjustments related to prior year acquisitions of approximately $12,600 and $8,300, respectively, plus foreign exchange impact of $738. The increase in goodwill was related to the interconnect product and assemblies segment.

The Company does not have any intangible assets not subject to amortization other than goodwill. As of December 31, 2006, the Company has acquired amortizable intangible assets with a total gross carrying amount of $52,830 of which $30,700, $9,500 and $6,000 relate to proprietary technology, customer relationships and license agreements, respectively, with the remainder relating to other amortizable intangible assets. The accumulated amortization related to these intangibles as of December 31, 2006 totaled $9,398 of which $2,187, $2,028 and $846 relate to proprietary technology, customer relationships and license agreements, respectively, with the remainder relating to other amortizable intangible assets. The acquired intangible assets have a total weighted-average useful life of approximately 12 years. The license agreements, proprietary technology and customer relationships have a weighted-average useful life of 8 years, 15 years and 5 years, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 was approximately $5,585 and amortization expense estimated for each of the next five fiscal years is approximately $5,200.

Note 9—Reportable Business Segments and International Operations

The Company has two reportable business segments: interconnect products and assemblies and cable products. The interconnect products and assemblies segment produces connectors and connector assemblies primarily for the communications, aerospace, industrial and automotive markets. The cable products segment produces coaxial and flat ribbon cable and related products primarily for communication markets, including cable television. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those for the Company as a whole and are described in Note 1 herein. The Company evaluates the performance of business units on, among other things, profit or loss from operations before interest expense, headquarters’ expense allocations, stock-based compensation expense, income taxes and nonrecurring gains and losses. The Company’s operating segments are an aggregation of business units that have similar production processes and products.

	Interconnect products and assemblies						Cable products						Total
	2006		2005		2004		2006		2005		2004		2006		2005		2004

Net sales
—external	$	2,207,508	$	1,592,439	$	1,333,838	$	263,922	$	215,708	$	196,608	$	2,471,430	$	1,808,147	$	1,530,446
—intersegment	3,875		2,755		2,311		16,892		15,635		14,369		20,767		18,390		16,680
Depreciation and amortization	65,958		43,945		32,427		6,023		6,216		5,969		71,981		50,161		38,396
Segment operating income	450,257		339,458		271,327		31,007		25,809		24,631		481,264		365,267		295,958
Segment assets	1,053,711		880,555		605,645		86,162		77,004		74,634		1,139,873		957,559		680,279
Additions to property, plant and equipment	79,866		55,002		43,152		1,788		1,671		1,700		81,654		56,673		44,852

Reconciliation of segment operating income to consolidated income before taxes:

	2006			2005			2004

Segment operating income	$	481,264		$	365,267		$	295,958

Interest expense	(38,799		)	(24,090		)	(22,540		)
Other expenses, net	(38,728		)	(30,811		)	(25,977		)
Stock-based compensation expense	(9,718		)	—			—
Casualty loss related to flood	(20,747		)	—			—
Expense for early extinguishment of debt	—			(2,398		)	—
Consolidated income before income taxes	$	373,272		$	307,968		$	247,441

Reconciliation of segment assets to consolidated total assets:

	2006		2005		2004

Segment assets	$	1,139,873	$	957,559	$	680,279
Goodwill	926,242		886,720		545,411
Other assets	129,282		88,261		81,021
Consolidated total assets	$	2,195,397	$	1,932,540	$	1,306,711

Geographic information:

	Net sales						Land and depreciable assets
	2006		2005		2004		2006		2005		2004
United States	$	1,059,974	$	802,351	$	674,302	$	99,532	$	102,434	$	69,949
International	1,411,456		1,005,796		856,144		174,611		151,455		127,804
Total	$	2,471,430	$	1,808,147	$	1,530,446	$	274,143	$	253,889	$	197,753

Revenues by geographic area are based on customer location to which product is shipped.

Note 10 – Casualty loss related to flood

The Company incurred damage at its Sidney, New York manufacturing facility as a result of severe and sudden flooding during the period from June 28 through July 1, 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded charges of $20,747 for recovery and clean up expenses and property related damage, net of insurance and grant recoveries. The Sidney facility had limited manufacturing and sales activity for the period from June 28 to July 14 but the plant was substantially back to full production at the end of the third quarter of 2006.

Note 11–Other Expenses, net

Other income (expense) is comprised as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004

Foreign currency transaction income (losses)	$	—		$	354		$	(643	)
Program fees on sale of accounts receivable	(5,018		)	(3,751		)	(2,254		)
Minority interests	(6,001		)	(4,084		)	(3,029		)
Agency and commitment fees	(2,057		)	(1,505		)	(980		)
Fees and expenses associated with secondary stock offering	—			—			(185		)
Other	555			115			428
	$	(12,521	)	$	(8,871	)	$	(6,663	)

Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies

In the course of pursuing its normal business activities, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims. Management does not expect that amounts, if any, which may be required to be paid by reason of such proceedings or claims will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Certain operations of the Company are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, as well as the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company believes that its operations are currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and that the costs of continuing compliance will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

The Company is currently involved in the environmental cleanup of several sites for conditions that existed at the time Amphenol was acquired from Allied Signal Corporation in 1987 (Allied Signal merged with Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) in December 1999). Amphenol and Honeywell were named jointly and severally liable as potentially responsible parties in relation to such sites. Amphenol and Honeywell have jointly consented to perform certain investigations and remedial and monitoring activities at two sites and they have been jointly ordered to perform work at another site. The costs incurred relating to these three sites are reimbursed by Honeywell based on an agreement (the “Honeywell Agreement”) entered into in connection with the acquisition in 1987. For sites covered by the Honeywell Agreement, to the extent that conditions or circumstances occurred or existed at the time of or prior to the acquisition, Honeywell is obligated to reimburse Amphenol 100% of such costs. Honeywell representatives continue to work closely with the Company in addressing the most significant environmental liabilities covered by the Honeywell Agreement. Management does not believe that the costs associated with resolution of these or any other environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The environmental cleanup matters identified by the Company, including those referred to above, are covered under the Honeywell Agreement.

Note 13—Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31		June 30			September 30			December 31
*2006*
Net sales	$	568,991	$	606,598		$	636,418		$	659,423
Gross profit	179,815		192,700			201,734			213,931
Operating income	98,391		93,010		(1)	108,557		(1)	124,634
Net income	57,274		53,341		(1)	66,699		(1)	78,377

Net income per share—Basic	.64		.60		(1)	.75		(1)	.88
Net income per share—Diluted	.63		.58		(1)	.73		(1)	.85
Stock price—High	52.50		61.62			64.39			70.49
—Low	43.88		49.33			50.30			60.88

*2005*
Net sales	$	409,395	$	443,642		$	446,995		$	508,115
Gross profit	136,222		149,776			149,802			164,654
Operating income	77,333		86,046			86,089			93,859
Net income	46,376		52,056			52,089			55,818
Net income per share—Basic	.53		.59			.59			.63
Net income per share—Diluted	.52		.58			.57			.61
Stock price—High	41.94		43.20			46.20			45.12
—Low	33.24		35.79			36.57			38.38

*2004*
Net sales	$	355,261	$	387,119		$	384,103		$	403,963
Gross profit	113,528		124,307			124,911			132,728
Operating income	61,283		69,054			70,303			76,004
Net income	35,658		40,367			41,646			45,640
Net income per share—Basic	.41		.46			.47			.52
Net income per share—Diluted	.40		.45			.47			.51
Stock price—High	34.70		34.49			34.37			37.52
—Low	28.13		29.75			27.90			32.23

(1) Includes a one-time charge for expenses incurred in connection with a flood at the Company’s Sidney, NY facility of $15,000 and $5,747, or $.11 and $.04, per diluted share after taxes during the second and third quarter of 2006, respectively.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Independent Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006. Based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s principal executive and financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

Management Report on Internal Control

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of Amphenol Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Company”). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Framework. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.

Deloitte and Touche LLP has audited the Company’s evaluation of the internal control environment in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). Those standards require that Deloitte and Touche LLP plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Deloitte and Touche LLP has issued an unqualified report stating the Company has maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.

February 7, 2007

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by Item 10 with respect to the Directors of the Registrant is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by Item 10 with respect to the Executive Officers of the Registrant is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Information regarding the Company’s code of business conduct and ethics is available on the Company’s website, www.amphenol.com. In addition a copy may be requested by writing to the Company’s World Headquarters at:

358 Hall Avenue

P.O. Box 5030

Wallingford, CT 06492

Item 11. Executive Compensation –

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required in Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required in Item 12 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required in Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Pursuant to Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required in Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement which is expected to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements

		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		29

Consolidated Statements of Income— Years Ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		31

Consolidated Balance Sheets— December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005		32

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Other Comprehensive Income— Years Ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		33

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow— Years Ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		34

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		35

Management Report on Internal Control		53

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2006


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Schedules		55
II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		56

Schedules other than the above have been omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information has been disclosed in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Schedules

To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Amphenol Corporation
Wallingford, Connecticut

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Amphenol Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and have issued our report thereon dated February 19, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the Company’s adoption of new accounting principles in 2006); such consolidated financial statements and report are included elsewhere in the Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company listed in Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
February 19, 2007

SCHEDULE II
AMPHENOL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(Dollars in thousands)

	Balance at beginning of period		Charged to cost and expenses		Acquisitions		Deductions			Balance at end of period

2006 Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	11,162	$	5,939	$	57	$	(2,481	)	$	14,677
2005 Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	8,666	$	2,327	$	1,855	$	(1,686	)	$	11,162
2004 Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	9,244	$	1,618	$	14	$	(2,210	)	$	8,666

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the Town of Wallingford, State of Connecticut on the 21st day of February 2007.

		AMPHENOL CORPORATION


		/s/	Martin H. Loeffler
			Martin H. Loeffler Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and as of the date indicated below.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Martin H. Loeffler	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	February 21, 2007
Martin H. Loeffler	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Diana G. Reardon	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial	February 21, 2007
Diana G. Reardon	Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
	Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Ronald P. Badie	Director	February 21, 2007
Ronald P. Badie

/s/ Stanley L. Clark	Director	February 21, 2007
Stanley L. Clark

/s/ Edward G. Jepsen	Director	February 21, 2007
Edward G. Jepsen

/s/ Andrew E. Lietz	Director	February 21, 2007
Andrew E. Lietz

/s/ John R. Lord	Director	February 21, 2007
John R. Lord

/s/ Dean H. Secord	Director	February 21, 2007
Dean H. Secord

(a)(3) Listing of Exhibits

3.1		By-Laws of the Company as of May 19, 1997 — NXS Acquisition Corp. By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
3.2		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated April 24, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the April 28, 2000 Form 8-K).*
3.3		Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated May 26, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.1		Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of May 19, 1997 among Amphenol Funding Corp., the Company, Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation and Nesbitt Burns Securities, Inc., as Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.2		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of September 26, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the September 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.3		Canadian Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of September 26, 1997 among Amphenol Canada Corp., Amphenol Funding Corp. and Amphenol Corporation, individually and as the initial servicer (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the September 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.4		Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 30, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the June 30, 2000 10-Q).*
10.5		Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 28, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the September 30, 2001 10-Q).*
10.6		Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of September 30, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the September 30, 2001 10-Q).*
10.7		Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of May 19, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.8		Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 18, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.9		Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 18, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.10		Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006 among Amphenol Funding Corp., the Company, Atlantic Asset Securitization LLC and Calyon New York Branch, as Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the June 30, 2006 10-Q).*
10.11		Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of May 19, 1997 among the Originators named therein, Amphenol Funding Corp. and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.12		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 18, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.13		Amended and Restated Purchase and Sales Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006 among the Originators named therein, Amphenol Funding Corp. and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the June 30, 2006 10-Q).* .
10.14		1997 Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.15		Amended 1997 Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the June 30, 1998 10-Q).*
10.16		2000 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the June 30, 2001 10-Q).*
10.17		Amended 2000 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the March 31, 2004 10-Q).*
10.18		Second Amended 2000 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.19		Third Amended 2000 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for Key Employees of Amphenol and Subsidiaries (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the June 30, 2006 10-Q).*
10.20		Form of 1997 Management Stockholders’ Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the December 31, 2004 10-K)*
10.21		Form of 1997 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.51 to the December 31, 2004 10-K)*
10.22		Form of 1997 Sale Participation Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the December 31, 2004 10-K)*
10.23		Form of 2000 Management Stockholders’ Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.53 to the December 31, 2004 10-K)*
10.24		Form of 2000 Management Stockholders’ Agreement as of May 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to the June 30, 2006 10-Q).*
10.25		Form of 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.54 to the December 31, 2004 10-K)*

10.26		Form of 2000 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement as of May 24, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the June 30, 2006 10-Q).*
10.27		Form of 2000 Sale Participation Agreement(filed as Exhibit 10.55 to the December 31, 2004 10-K)*
10.28		Management Agreement between the Company and Martin H. Loeffler, dated July 28, 1987 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the 1987 Registration Statement).*
10.29		Management Stockholders’ Agreement entered into as of May 19, 1997 between the Company and Martin H. Loeffler (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.30		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Martin H. Loeffler May 19, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.31		Management Stockholders’ Agreement entered into as of June 6, 2000 between the Company and Martin H. Loeffler (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the December 31, 2001 10-K).*
10.32		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Martin H. Loeffler dated as of June 6, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the December 31, 2001 10-K).*
10.33		Management Stockholders’ Agreement entered into as of May 19, 1997 between the Company and Edward G. Jepsen (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.34		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Edward G. Jepsen dated as of May 19, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.35		Management Stockholders’ Agreement entered into as of June 6, 2000 between the Company and Edward G. Jepsen (filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the December 31, 2001 10-K).*
10.36		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Edward G. Jepsen dated as of June 6, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the December 31, 2001 10-K).*
10.37		Management Stockholders’ Agreement entered into as of May 19, 1997 between the Company and Timothy F. Cohane (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.38		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Timothy F. Cohane dated as of May 19, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the June 30, 1997 10-Q).*
10.39		Management Stockholders’ Agreement entered into as of June 6, 2000 between the Company and Timothy F. Cohane (filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the December 31, 2002 10-K).*
10.40		Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Company and Timothy F. Cohane dated as of June 6, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the December 31, 2001 10-K).*
10.41		Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the December 31, 2001 10-K).*
10.42		First Amendment to the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002**
10.43		Second Amendment to the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002**
10.44		Third Amendment to the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002**
10.45		Fourth Amendment to the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002**
10.46		Fifth Amendment to the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002**
10.47		Sixth Amendment to the Pension Plan for Employees of Amphenol Corporation as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002**
10.48		Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan formally adopted effective January 25, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the 1996 10-K).*
10.49		First Amendment (2000-1) to the Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement plan (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the September 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.50		Second Amendment (2004-1) to the Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the September 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.51		Third Amendment (2006-1) to the Amphenol Corporation Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan**
10.52		Amphenol Corporation Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the December 31, 1997 10-K).*
10.53		The 2004 Stock Option Plan for Directors of Amphenol Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.54		The 2004 Amphenol Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the March 31, 2004 10-Q).*
10.55		The 2004 Amphenol Executive Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the June 30, 2004 10-Q).*
10.56		2005 Amphenol Corporation Management Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.56 to the March 31, 2005 10-Q).*
10.57		2006 Amphenol Corporation Management Incentive Plan. (filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the December 31, 2005 10-K).*

10.58		Credit Agreement dated as of May 6, 2003 among Amphenol Corporation, the Lenders listed therein, Fleet National Bank and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Documentation Agents, UBS Warburg LLC, as Syndication Agent and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2003).*
10.59		Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement dated as of November 6, 2003, among Amphenol Corporation, the Lenders listed therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the September 30, 2003 10-Q).*
10.60		Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2004, among Amphenol Corporation, the Lenders listed therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as administrative agent (filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed on November 10, 2004).*
10.61		Credit Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2005, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company, a syndicate of financial institutions and Bank of America, N.A. acting as the administrative agent (filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2005).*
10.62		Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 1, 2006 among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company, a syndicate of financial institutions and Bank of America, N.A. acting as the administrative agent (filed as Exhibit 10.55 to the June 30, 2006 10-Q).*
10.63		Agreement and Plan of Merger among Amphenol Acquisition Corporation, Allied Corporation and the Company, dated April 1, 1987, and the Amendment thereto dated as of May 15, 1987 (filed as Exhibit 2 to the 1987 Registration Statement).*
10.64		Settlement Agreement among Allied Signal Inc., the Company and LPL Investment Group, Inc. dated November 28, 1988 (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the 1991 Registration Statement).*
10.65		Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement between Teradyne, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation, dated October 10, 2005 (filed as an Exhibit to the Form 8-K filed on October 11, 2005).*
10.66		Amphenol Corporation Employee Savings/401(k) Plan Document (filed as Exhibit 10.58 to the March 31, 2006 10Q)*
10.67		Amphenol Corporation Employee Savings/401(k) Plan Adoption Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.59 to the March 31, 2006 10Q)*
10.68		First Amendment (2006-1) to Amphenol Corporation Employee Savings/401(k) Plan Adoption Agreement **
10.69		Second Amendment (2006-2) to Amphenol Corporation Employee Savings/401(k) Plan Adoption Agreement **
21.1		Subsidiaries of the Company.**
23.1		Consent of Deloitte & Touche.**
31.1		Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14; as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
31.2		Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14; as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
32.2		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

* Incorporated herein by reference as stated.

** Filed herewith